Your browser may have trouble rendering this page. See supported browsers for more information.

|<<>>|259 of 260 Show listMobile Mode

Heretics of Dune Notes

Published by marco on

Updated by marco on

Page 123 − “At the quantum level our universe can be seen as an indeterminate place, predictable in a statistical way only when you employ large enough numbers. Between that universe and a relatively predictable one where the passage of a single planet can be timed to a picosecond, other forces come into play. For the in-between universe where we find our daily lives, that which you believe is a dominant force. Your beliefs order the unfolding of daily events. If enough of us believe, a new thing can be made to exist. Belief structure creates a filter through which chaos is sifted into order.” − Bene Gesserit Archives

Page 198 − “…recognition that men were not created equal, that they possessed different inherited abilities and experienced different events in their lives. The produced people of different accomplishments and different worth.”

Page 213 − “Bureaucracy destroys initiative. There is little that bureaucrats hate more than innovation, especially innovation that produces better results than the old routines. Improvements always make those at the top of the heap look inept. Who enjoys appearing inept?” − Bene Gesserit Archives

Page 464 − “We are not looking at a new state of matter but at a newly recognized relationship between consciousness and matter, which provides a more penetrating insight into the workings of prescience. The oracle shapes a projected inner universe to produce new external probabilities out of forces that are not understood. There is no need to understand these forces before using them to shape the physical universe. Ancient metal workers had no need to understand the molecular complexities of their steel, bronze, copper, gold and tin. They invented mystical powers to describe the unknown while they continued to operate their forges and wield their hammers.” − Taraza

Page 468 − “The writing of history is largely a process of diversion. Most historical accounts divert attention from the secret influences around the recorded events. … The few histories that escape this restrictive process vanish into obscurity through obvious processes. … Destruction of as many copies as possible, burying the too revealing accounts in ridicule, ignoring them in the centers of education, insuring that they are not quoted elsewhere and, in some cases, elimination of the authors.” − Miles Teg