<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/atom.css" ?><feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <generator uri="https://www.earthli.com/news/" version="3.7">
    earthli News 3.7
  </generator>
    <title type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[Books &gt; earthli News 3.7]]>
  </title>
  <id>https://www.earthli.com/news/</id>
  <link rel="self" href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_folder_rss.php?content=full_html&amp;format=atom&amp;id=34"/>
  <updated>2026-02-10T21:31:05+01:00</updated>
  <icon>https://www.earthli.com/news/icons/webcore_png/app/news_100px.png</icon>
    <subtitle type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[]]>
  </subtitle>
    <rights type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[Copyright (c) 1999-2026 earthli.com. All Rights Reserved.]]>
  </rights>
  <entry>
      <title type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[Technical papers read in 2023]]>
  </title>
    <id>https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=4715</id>
    <link href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=4715"/>
    <updated>2026-01-24T13:11:55+01:00</updated>
    <author>
        <name type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[Marco von Ballmoos]]>
  </name>
      <uri>https://earthli.com/users/marco</uri>
    </author>
      <summary type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<p>In 2023, I read a lot of longer, technical papers for which I took notes (as usual) but that don&rsquo;t really qualify as books, as such. Some of them were of what some might call book-length, though. I present these with original—though very sparse—comments amid the citations I found interesting... [<a class="complete-text-link" href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=4715">More</a>]</p>
]]>
  </summary>
      <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<html lang="en">
  <head>
    <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/themes/ice.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/fonts/raleway.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/core/medium.css">
  </head>
  <body>
<div class="style-controls">  <div class="page">
    <div class="page-body">
<div class="info-box-top">
<p>
Published by <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_user.php?name=marco" title="Marco von Ballmoos" class="visible">marco</a> on <span class="date-time">24. Jan 2026 13:11:55 (GMT-5)</span>
</p>
</div>
      <div class="text-flow wide">
  <p>In 2023, I read a lot of longer, technical papers for which I took notes (as usual) but that don&rsquo;t really qualify as books, as such. Some of them were of what some might call book-length, though. I present these with original—though very sparse—comments amid the citations I found interesting and relevant from those documents.</p>
<dl><dt class="field">Programming</dt>
<dd><ol>
<li><a href="#usability">The Usability of Advanced Type Systems: Rust as a Case Study</a> (January, 2023)</li>
<li><a href="#nato1968">nato1968 − Software Engineering</a> (October, 1968)</li>
<li><a href="#IEEE">IEEE-Annals − A Brief History of Software Engineering</a> (February 2008)</li>
<li><a href="#Compiling">Compiling Swift Generics</a> (October 2022)</li>
<li><a href="#Ritchie">How did Dennis Ritchie Produce his PhD Thesis? A Typographical Mystery</a> (June 2022)</li>
<li><a href="#Capability">Capability Myths Demolished</a> (2003)</li>
<li><a href="#Serverless">Serverless Computing: One Step Forward, Two Steps Back</a> (December 2018)</li>
<li><a href="#Algebraic">Algebraic Effects for Functional Programming</a> (August 2016)</li>
<li><a href="#Generalized">Generalized Algebraic Data Types and Object-Oriented Programming</a> (August 2005)</li>
<li><a href="#Fexprs">Fexprs as the basis of Lisp function application or <code>$vau</code>: the ultimate abstraction</a> (August 2010)</li></ol></dd>
<dt class="field">Economics</dt>
<dd><ol>
<li><a href="#Regulating">Regulating the Sharing Economy</a> (June 2016)</li>
<li><a href="#Political">Political Aspects of Full Employment</a> (Spring 1942)</li>
<li><a href="#Crypto">Crypto is the Mother of All Scams and (Now Busted) Bubbles While Blockchain Is The Most Over-Hyped Technology Ever, No Better than a Spreadsheet/Database</a> (October 2018)</li>
<li><a href="#Housing">The Housing Bubble and the Great Recession: Ten Years Later</a> (September 2018)</li></ol></dd>
</dl><p><a href="https://www.earthli.com/data/news/attachments/entry/4715/stack_of_technical_papers.webp"><img title="Stack of technical papers" src="https://www.earthli.com/data/news/attachments/entry/4715/stack_of_technical_papers.webp" alt=" " style="width: 600px"></a></p>
<h2 id="usability">The Usability of Advanced Type Systems: Rust as a Case Study</h2><p><a href="https://arxiv.org/abs/2301.02308">The Usability of Advanced Type Systems: Rust as a Case Study</a> by <cite>Kasra Ferdowsi</cite> on January 5, 2023 (<cite><a href="http://arxiv.org/">Arxiv</a></cite>)</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;[…] a human-centered evaluation of these type systems and their usability was all but absent, with empirical evaluations limited to testing their expressiveness in programs written by experts, i.e. the creators of the type system.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 4-5</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Linear Types enable memory management of mutable values without Garbage Collection. If a value cannot be copied or implicitly discarded and it must be used exactly once, then we can reclaim its memory after it is used. This handles memory management, and prevents use-after-free and double-free bugs. By prohibiting aliasing, Linear Types also solve the problem of reasoning about mutations, both in single-threaded code (where aliased references are a notable source of bugs), and in multi-threaded code (where aliasing can lead to race conditions).&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 38-42</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;[…] these types were neither widely adopted, nor evaluated on real users. Instead, each extension, implementation or application of these types was only evaluated by the designers of the system, who programmed real-world applications with their type system to argue for its expressiveness&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 87-89</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Linear, Region and Ownership Types are related by their attention to memory management and safety. Each realized that type systems could be used to help programmers reason about complex programs, prevent various errors in using aliased or freed references, and offer a provably correct solution to memory management without the need for runtime checks or garbage collection.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 98-100</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Note that both of these programs are “safe”, and a more advanced type system involving dependent types could in theory statically verify the safety of Fig. 3a, but the current limitations of the type system means that developers need to learn, not just the rules of Ownership, but how the borrow-checker verifies them.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 330-332</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;In the 5 applications they inspected, [Qin et al. 2020] found 4990 uses of unsafe, with a further 1581 unsafe code regions in the standard library, and concluded that unsafe code is used “extensively”. Though they note that it is “unavoidable in many cases” and “usually for good reasons”, including interfacing with existing libraries written in other unsafe languages such as C, and performance improvements by a factor of 4 or 5.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 368-371</div></div><h2 id="nato1968">nato1968 − Software Engineering</h2><p><a href="http://homepages.cs.ncl.ac.uk/brian.randell/NATO/nato1968.PDF">SOFTWARE ENGINEERING Report on a conference sponsored by the NATO SCIENCE COMMITTEE</a> by <cite>Peter Naur and Brian Randell</cite> in October 1968</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><ul>
<li>the problems of achieving sufficient reliability in the data systems which are becoming increasingly integrated into the central activities of modern society</li>
<li>the difficulties of meeting schedules and specifications on large software projects</li>
<li>the education of software (or data systems) engineers</li></ul></div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 25-28</div></div><p>The problems that confront us today have been with us since 1968. We have improved our approach, but it&rsquo;s a bit sobering to think how accurately these 56-year-old bullet points capture our current predicament.</p>
<h2 id="IEEE">IEEE-Annals − A Brief History of Software Engineering</h2><p><a href="https://annas-archive.org/md5/f4094360b5f45fd31daf6b5e6bfe8f74"> A Brief History of Software Engineering</a> by <cite>Niklaus Wirth</cite> on February 2nd, 2008 (<cite><a href="http://annas-archive.org/">Anna&#039;s Archive</a></cite>)</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;[…] the rapid growth of computing power made it possible to apply computing to ever more complicated tasks. This trend dramatically increased the demands on software engineers. Programs and systems became complex and almost impossible to fully understand. The sinking cost and the abundance of computing resources inevitably reduced the care for good design. Quality seemed extravagant, a loser in the race for profit. But we should be concerned about the resulting deterioration in quality. Our limitations are no longer given by slow hardware, but by our own intellectual capability. From experience we know that most programs could be significantly improved, made more reliable, economical and comfortable to use.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 8-13</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The sinking cost and the abundance of computing resources inevitably reduced the care for good design. Quality seemed extravagant, a loser in the race for profit. But we should be concerned about the resulting deterioration in quality. Our limitations are no longer given by slow hardware, but by our own intellectual capability.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 10-12</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;From the point of view of software engineering, the rapid spread of C represented a great leap backward. It revealed that the community at large had hardly grasped the true meaning of the term “high-level language” which became an ill-understood buzzword.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 58-60</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Computer systems are machines of large complexity. This complexity can be mastered intellectually by one tool only: Abstraction. A language represents an abstract computer whose objects and constructs lie closer (higher) to the problem to be represented than to the concrete machine. For example, in a high-level language we deal with numbers, indexed arrays, data types, conditional and repetitive statements, rather than with bits and bytes, addressed words, jumps and condition codes.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 61-64</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;C provided freedom, where high-level languages were considered as straight-jackets enforcing unwanted discipline. It was an invitation to use tricks which had been necessary to achieve efficiency in the early days of computers, but now were pitfalls that made large systems error-prone and costly to debug and “maintain”.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 72-74</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The group of Ken Bowles at UC San Diego built a text editor, a file system, and a debugger around the portable Pascal compiler (P-code) developed at ETH, and they distributed it for $50. So did the Borland company with its version of compiler. This was at a time when other compilers were expensive software, and it was nothing less than a turning-point in commercializing software. Suddenly, there was a mass market. Computing went public&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 84-87</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The craft of programming turned to “hacking. Methods were sought to systematize, if not construction, then at least program testing and documentation. Although this was helpful, the real problems of hectic programming under timepressure remained.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 88-90</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Methods were sought to systematize, if not construction, then at least program testing and documentation. Although this was helpful, the real problems of hectic programming under time pressure remained. Dijkstra brought the difficulty to the point by saying: Testing may show the presence of errors, but it can never prove their absence.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 88-91</div></div><p>Add this to the workshop presentation</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Just as structured programming had been the guiding spirit behind Pascal, modularization was the principal idea behind the language Modula-2, the successor of Pascal, published in 1979 [15]. In fact, its motivation came from the language Mesa, an internal development of the Xerox Research Lab in Palo Alto, and itself a descendant of Pascal. The concept of modularization and separate compilation was also adopted by the language Ada (1984), which was also based largely on Pascal. Here, modules were called packages.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 106-109</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;It is no exaggeration at all to claim that the modern computing era started in 1975 with the Alto. The Alto caused nothing less than a revolution, and as a result people to-day have no idea, how computing was done before 1975 without personal, highly interactive workstations. The influence of these developments on software engineering cannot be overestimated.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 115-117</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Languages appeared supporting this model, among them Smalltalk (Goldberg and Kay, 1980), Object-Pascal (Tesler, 1985), C++ (Stroustrup, 1985), Oberon (Wirth, 1988), Java (Sun, 1995) and C# (Microsoft, 2000).&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 128-129</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;I am overwhelmed, when I compare this with the first, stand-alone minicomputer that I worked with in 1965, a DEC PDP-1: Clock rate, &lt; 1 MHz, memory of 8K word of 18 bits, drum storage of some 200 KB. It was time-shared by up to 16 users. It is a miracle that some people insisted in believing that one day computers would become powerful enough to be useful.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 137-140</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;In the 1990s, a phenomenon started to spread under the name of Open Source. The distrust against huge systems designed in industrial secrecy became manifest. A wide community of programmers decided to build software and to distribute their products for free through the Internet. Although it is difficult to recognize this as a sound business principle – making the idea of patents obsolete – the bandwagon turned out to be rather successful. The notions of quality and responsibility in case of failure seemed irrelevant. Open Source appeared as the welcome alternative to industrial hegemony and abrasive profit, and also against helpless dependence.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 140-144</div></div><p>Patents are not sound business principle. They are a business principle. The revolution has to start somewhere.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Surely, software engineering has profited too from the many sophisticated development tools. But the quality of its products hardly reflects signs of great progress. No wonder: After all, the increase of power was itself the reason for the terrifying growth of complexity. Whatever progress was made in software methodology was quickly compensated by higher complexity of the tasks. This is reflected by Reiser’s “law”: “Software is getting slower faster than hardware is getting faster”. Indeed, new problems have been tackled that are so difficult that engineers often have to be admired more for their optimism and courage than for their success.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 150-155</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The consequence is waste of cheap resources – processor cycles and storage bits – resulting in inefficient code and bulky data. This waste has become ever-present and represents a grave lack of sense for quality. Inefficiency of programs is easily covered up by obtaining faster processors, and poor data design by the use of larger storage devices. But their side effect is a decrease of quality – of reliability, robustness, and ease of use. Good, careful design is timeconsuming, costly. But it is still cheaper than unreliable, difficult software, when the cost of “maintenance” is not factored&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 156-160</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;A primary effort must be education toward a sense of quality. Programmers must become engaged crusaders against home-made complexity. The cancerous growth of complexity is not a thing to be admired; it must be fought wherever possible [17]. Programmers must be given time and respect for work of high quality. This is crucial and ultimately more effective than better tools and rules.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 162-165</div></div><h2 id="Compiling">Compiling Swift Generics</h2><p><a href="https://download.swift.org/docs/assets/generics.pdf">Compiling Swift Generics</a> by <cite>Slava Pestov</cite> on October 17, 2022 (<cite><a href="http://download.swift.org/">Swift.org</a></cite>)</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The standard ownership semantics for a Swift function call are defined such that the caller retains ownership over the parameter values passed into the callee, while the callee transfers ownership of the return value to the caller. This means that the identity(_:) function cannot just return the value x; instead, it must first create a logical copy of × that it owns, and then return this owned copy. This is achieved by incrementing the string value’s buffer reference count via a call to a runtime function.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 133-136</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;As the joke goes, every problem in computer science can be solved with an extra level of indirection. The calling convention for a generic function takes runtime type metadata for every generic parameter in the function’s generic signature. Every type in the language has a reified representation as runtime type metadata, storing the type’s size and alignment together with function pointers implementing the move, copy and destroy operations. The generated code for a generic function abstractly manipulates values of generic parameter type using the runtime type metadata provided by the caller. An important property of runtime type metadata is identity; two pointers to runtime type metadata are equal if and only if they represent the same type in the language.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 145-150</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Definitions of generic functions are always visible to the specializer within their defining module. Shared library developers can also optin to exporting the body of a function across module boundaries with the @inlinable attribute.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 173-174</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The witness table for this conformance references the witness (indirectly, because the witness is always wrapped in a thunk, which is a small function which shuffles some registers around and then calls the actual witness. This must be the case because protocol requirements use a slightly different calling convention than ordinary generic functions).&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 237-239</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;While metadata for generic parameters is passed in directly, for dependent member types the metadata is recovered from one or more witness tables provided by the caller.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 269-270</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Operator symbols are declared at the top level of a module. Operator symbols have a fixity (prefix, infix, or postfix), and infix operators also have a precedence group. Precedence groups are partially ordered with respect to other precedence groups. Standard operators like + and * and their precedence groups are thus defined in the standard library, rather than being built-in to the language itself.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 415-418</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The request evaluator framework was first introduced in Swift 4.2 [ 5]. In subsequent releases, various ad-hoc mechanisms were gradually converted into request evaluator requests, with resulting gains to compiler performance, stability, and implementation maintainability.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 523-525</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The Swift ABI was formally stabilized in Swift 5.0, when the standard library became part of the operating system on Apple platforms. Library evolution support and textual interfaces became user-visible features in Swift 5.1&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 640-642</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The difference between the type representation Array&lt;Int&gt; and the type Array&lt;Int&gt; is that the type representation only stores identifiers, with no connection to the declaration of Array and Int. The semantic type points at the declarations themselves.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 727-729</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The utmost care must be taken when working with type variables because unlike all other types, they are not allocated with indefinite lifetime. Type variables live in the constraint solver arena, which grows and shrinks as the solver explores branches of the solution space. Types that contain type variables, and other structures that recursively contain such types, also need to be allocated in the constraint solver arena.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 932-934</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;In contrast, the second case would introduce significant complexity to the language design, by allowing “generic protocols” with more generic parameters than just the protocol Self type. Such a protocol would be what Haskell calls a “multi-parameter type class.” Unlike the prior generalizations this one carries profound implications and tradeoffs and it is not clear that it belongs in the Swift language.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 2007-2009</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The first case is a relatively straightforward; the non-generic declaration contexts acts as a namespace to which the protocol declaration is scoped. In contrast, the second case would introduce significant complexity to the language design, by allowing “generic protocols” with more generic parameters than just the protocol Self type. Such a protocol would be what Haskell calls a “multi-parameter type class.” Unlike the prior generalizations this one carries profound implications and tradeoffs and it is not clear that it belongs in the Swift language.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 2006-2009</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;[…] imagine if there were two different conformances of some concrete type K to Hashable. Then it would be possible for two different modules to construct values of type Set&lt;K&gt; with incompatible hash functions; passing such a value from one module to the other would result in undefined behavior. For now, there’s no real answer to this dilemma. The compiler rejects duplicate conformance definitions if an existing conformance is statically visible, so this scenario cannot occur with Int and Hashable for instance, because the conformance of Int to Hashable in the standard library is always visible, so any attempt to define a new conformance would be diagnosed as an error. However, if the concrete type K is defined in some common module, and two separatelycompiled modules both define a conformance of K to Hashable, a module that imports all three will observe both conformances statically, with unpredictable results.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 2103-2109</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;In the absence of proper compiler support for addressing this problem, there is a rule of thumb that, if followed by Swift users, mostly guarantees coherence. The rule is that when defining a conformance on an extension, either the extended type or the protocol should be part of the current module.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 2117-2119</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;A conformance where neither the conforming type nor the protocol is part of the current module is called a retroactive conformance. Today, retroactive conformances are allowed without any restrictions. In a future compiler version, they might generate a warning.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 2123-2125</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;A client might declare a subclass of BaseClass and conform it to MyProtocol, concluding this it is safe to do so because the conforming type, DerivedClass, is owned by the client, and thus this is not a retroactive conformance: 1 import OtherLibrary 2 3 class DerivedClass: BaseClass {} 4 extension DerivedClass: MyProtocol {} However, in the next version of the framework, the framework author might decide to conform BaseClass to MyProtocol. At this point, DerivedClass has two duplicate conformances to MyProtocol; the inherited conformance from BaseClass, and the local conformance of DerivedClass.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 2127-2132</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;You might wonder why archetypes exist at all, when at first glance, they appear equivalent to a reduced type parameter together with a generic signature. In the case of primary archetypes at least, the reason is partly historical. However, the additional indirection provided by creating multiple generic environments from a single generic signature allows archetypes to represent abstract types which are not described by the generic parameters that are in the scope of a generic declaration, namely opaque return types and existential types.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 2397-2401</div></div><h2 id="Ritchie">How did Dennis Ritchie Produce his PhD Thesis? A Typographical Mystery</h2><p><a href="https://www.cs.princeton.edu/~bwk/dmr/doceng22.pdf">How did Dennis Ritchie Produce his PhD Thesis? A Typographical Mystery</a> by <cite>David F. Brailsford, Brian W. Kernighan, William A. Ritchie</cite> in 2022</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;It may be hard for readers today to appreciate just how labor-intensive it was to prepare documents before the creation of word processing programs, when there were only mechanical typewriters—better than clay tablets or quill pens, to be sure, but any change of more than a few words in a document could require a complete retype. Thus most documents went through only one or two revisions, with handwritten changes on a manuscript that had to be laboriously retyped to make a clean copy.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 70-73</div></div><h2 id="Capability">Capability Myths Demolished</h2><p><a href="https://srl.cs.jhu.edu/pubs/SRL2003-02.pdf">Capability Myths Demolished</a> by <cite>Mark S. Miller, Ka-Ping Yee, Jonathan Shapiro</cite> in 2003</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;By shifting to this new visualization, where the references are explicitly visible, we see a difference between the models that was previously obscured: the direction of the arrows. To see why this matters, let us consider how subjects and resources refer to each other.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 70-72</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;In a capability system, each capability points from a subject to a resource. Consequently every capability can serve both to designate which resource to access, and to provide the authority to perform that access. This change provides us with the option to avoid introducing a shared namespace into the foundations of the model, and thereby avoid the complex issues involved in managing a shared namespace – issues rarely acknowledged as a cost of non-capability models.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 78-81</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Although Lampson’s definition of the access matrix does not prohibit the possibility of fine-grained subjects4, even in an ACL system, the difficulty just explained strongly motivates ACL systems to define subjects at a coarse granularity so as to keep the set of subjects relatively static.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 88-90</div></div><p>This is exactly what you end up doing. But it also applies to claims.</p>
<h2 id="Serverless">Serverless Computing: One Step Forward, Two Steps Back</h2><p><a href="https://arxiv.org/pdf/1812.03651.pdf">Serverless Computing: One Step Forward, Two Steps Back</a> by <cite>Joseph M. Hellerstein, Jose Faleiro, Joseph E. Gonzalez, Johann Schleier-Smith, Vikram Sreekanti, Alexey Tumanov and Chenggang Wu</cite> (<cite><a href="http://arxiv.org/">Arxiv</a></cite>)</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;[…] serverless computing today is at best a simple and powerful way to run embarrassingly parallel computations or harness proprietary services. At worst, it can be viewed as a cynical effort to lock users into those services and lock out innovation.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 94-95</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Recent studies show that a single Lambda function can achieve on average 538Mbps network bandwidth; numbers from Google and Azure were in the same ballpark [26]. This is an order of magnitude slower than a single modern SSD. Worse, AWS appears to attempt to pack Lambda functions from the same user together on a single VM, so the limited bandwidth is shared by multiple functions.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 101-103</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The result is that as compute power scales up, per-function bandwidth shrinks proportionately. With 20 Lambda functions, average network bandwidth was 28.7Mbps—2.5 orders of magnitude slower than a single SSD [26]&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 103-105</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;[…] two Lambda functions can only communicate through an autoscaling intermediary service; today, this means a storage system like S3 that is radically slower and more expensive than point-to-point networking. As a corollary, a client of Lambda cannot address the particular function instance that handled the client’s previous request: there is no “stickiness” for client connections. Hence maintaining state across client calls requires writing the state out to slow storage, and reading it back on every subsequent call.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 111-115</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;[…] serverless functions are short-lived and non-addressable, so their capacity to cache state internally to service&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 120-121</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;FaaS routinely “ships data to code” rather than “shipping code to data.” This is a recurring architectural antipattern among system designers, which database aficionados seem to need to point out each generation. Memory hierarchy realities— across various storage layers and network delays—make this a bad design decision for reasons of latency, bandwidth, and cost.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 121-124</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;[…] with all communication transiting through storage, there is no real way for thousands (much less millions) of cores in the cloud to work together efficiently using current FaaS platforms other than via largely uncoordinated (embarrassing) parallelism.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 132-134</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;[…] we trained the same model on an m4.large EC2 instance, which has 8GB of RAM and 2vCPUs. In this setting, each iteration is significantly faster (0.14 seconds): 0.04 seconds to fetch data from an EBS volume and 0.1 seconds to run the optimizer. The same training process takes about 1300 seconds (just under 22 minutes), which translates to a cost of $0.04. Lambda’s limited resources and data-shipping architecture mean that running this algorithm on Lambda is 21× slower and 7.3× more expensive than running on EC2.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 153-157</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The first replaced Lambda’s role in the application with an EC2 machine to receive SQS message batches—this showed a latency of 13ms per batch averaged over 1,000 batches—27× faster than our “optimized” Lambda implementation. The second experiment used ZeroMQ to replace SQS’s role in the application, and receive messages directly on the EC2 machine. This “serverful” version had a per batch latency of 2.8ms—127× faster than the optimized Lambda implementation.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 171-174</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;[…] there are two classical dual patterns to implement concurrent communicating systems: eventdriven execution over shared state (the natural FaaS approach), or message-passing across long-running agents with distributed state [16].&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 185-186</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;[…] communicating via cloud storage is not a reasonable replacement for directly-addressed networking, even with direct I/O—it is at leaste one order of magnitude too slow. “Pure” functional FaaS programming style exacerbates that expense to an inordinate degree, and should be avoided at all costs.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 196-198</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;To model this, we implemented one of the simplest of these protocols in Python: Garcia-Molina’s bully leader election [7].&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 202-202</div></div><p>Why always Python? Are there no numeric libraries in other languages? Of course not. C# 7 has SIMD and vectorization and parallelization. It has AOT in version eight. Why on Earth is Python still so popular? Is it the omly thing peope know? Is it inertia now? Are data scientists just shitty programmers withnofeel for memory or performance efficiency? It&rsquo;s kind of like the JS/Node everywhere thing. There are far, far better runtimes. We have LLVM. Why did the shitty hack win?</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;FaaS limitations favor operational flexibility over developer control, a theme we generally agree is critical to the scale and elasticity of the cloud—and a major design shift from the traditional data systems ethos.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 210-211</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Developers are forced to compose larger programs out of asynchronous tasks, with no guarantees like sequential consistency or serializability to reason about the semantics of global state mutation across tasks. These limitations can be challenging for developers used to writing sequential programs or transactions. But the result may be both healthy and manageable: this kind of “disorderly” loosely-consistent model has been at the heart of a number of more general-purpose proposals for scalable, available program design in recent years,&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 213-217</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Any reasonable system design will need the ability to selectively co-locate code and data on the same side of a network boundary, whether that is done via caching/prefetching data near computation or pushing computation closer to data. Neither feature is provided in a meaningful way by today’s FaaS offerings.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 247-249</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;[…] we see autoscaling (and hence pay per use) as a big step forward, but disappointingly limited to applications that can work over today’s hobbled provider infrastructure. We acknowledge that there is an enormous market of such “narrow” applications, many of which consist of little more than business logic over a database.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 264-266</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;[…] serverless computing could produce a local minimum: yet another setting in which the compute and storage potential of the cloud is lost in the noise of refactoring low-tech and often legacy use cases.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 270-271</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;We see the future of cloud programming as far, far brighter than the promise of today’s serverless FaaS offerings. Getting to that future requires revisiting the designs and limitations of what is being called “serverless computing” today.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 274-276</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;High-level, data-centric DSLs—e.g., SQL+UDFs, MapReduce, TensorFlow—can make this more tractable, by exposing at a high level how data flows through computation. The more declarative the language, the more logical separation (and optimization search space) is offered to the infrastructure.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 284-286</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;[…] recognizing hardware affinity does not mean that we advocate tight binding of hardware to services; the platform should make dynamic physical decisions about allocation of code to distinguished resources, based on logical performance requirement specs either provided by programmers or extracted from code.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 291-293</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;[…] elasticity requirements dictate that these agents be virtual and dynamically remapped across physical resources. Hence we need virtual alternatives to traditional operating system constructs like “threads” and “ports”: nameable endpoints in the network. Various ideas from the literature have provided aspects of this idea: actors [11], tuplespaces [4] pub/sub [18] and DHTs [21] are all examples.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 298-300</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;[…] if cloud programming is achieved via higher-level abstractions, it will offer the opportunity for program analysis and constraint enforcement that could improve security. However, some of our desired architectural improvements for performance in this paper make achieving security more difficult for the responsible parties.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 318-320</div></div><h2 id="Algebraic">Algebraic Effects for Functional Programming</h2><p><a href="https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/research/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/algeff-tr-2016-v2.pdf">Algebraic Effects for Functional Programming</a> by <cite>Daan Leijen</cite> (<cite><a href="http://www.microsoft.com/">Microsoft</a></cite>)</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;It has long been recognized that one can selectively CPS transform only parts of the program that need it [8, 9, 37]. In our case, we only have to use CPS translation on those parts that may issue effectful operations. Moreover, since effects are tracked in the type system, we can use a type-directed selective CPS translation (as used by Scala [38] for example). We built on the translation by Nielsen [31] who introduces a sound selective CPS translation for the simply typed lambda calculus extended with callcc and throw. However, the translation by Nielsen applies to monomorphic effects only and we will see that in the presence of polymorphic effect variables the translation becomes more complex.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 491-497</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The built-in effects consist of exceptions (exn), non-termination (div), non-determinism (ndet), polymorphic state (st⟨h⟩), and general I/O operations (io). All of these are usually provided directly by the target system (like JavaScript) and can thus be directly compiled without needing CPS translation. This turns out to be a very important optimization as many (leaf) functions do not use any user defined effects and can thus be compiled directly – and implies there is no cost for effect handlers for any code that does not use them.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 508-512</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;In the case of polymorphic functions, the simplified types of Section 3.2 turn out to have a performance impact as well: many functions that would otherwise get a type with an open polymorphic effect, are now closed and thus do not need a CPS translation as H will be false. In the Koka core library, this reduced the set of CPS translated functions by over 80%.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 517-520</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Here we take another approach: we are going to try to not change the runtime representation of functions that are CPS translated, even if they are called from a nonCPS context and the continuation argument is lacking. We assume that our target environment supports some form of variadic functions and that we can check at runtime if the k argument is present or not. This is well supported in JavaScript but it works well in typed environments too. For example, for the .NET target, first-class functions are represented by function objects and we can modify to the Apply methods to check if the k parameter was present.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 562-567</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Since only the tail of an effect row can be polymorphic, there is no risk of exponential code duplication. Even for the Koka core library which contains many of these higher-order effect polymorphic functions, the code size increased by a modest 20%.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 591-592</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;[…] the original Links type system can be naturally extended to handle algebraic effects too. Their system is also based on row-polymorphism but they use instead Remy style rows [36] where the kind system is extended to record presence or absence of effects in the row. We believe our approach based on scoped labels [22] is simpler in practice, but the Remy style can be more expressive as it can describe the absence of effects.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 608-611</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Algebraic effect handlers concisely describe many complex control-flow constructs in various programming languages. We hope that the language design, the direct operational semantics, and compilation scheme described in this article will contribute to wider adoption of algebraic effects.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 623-625</div></div><h2 id="Generalized">Generalized Algebraic Data Types and Object-Oriented Programming</h2><p><a href="https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/research/wp-content/uploads/2016/02/gadtoop.pdf">Generalized Algebraic Data Types and Object-Oriented Programming</a> by <cite>Andrew Kennedy and Claudio V. Russo</cite> (<cite><a href="http://www.microsoft.com/">Microsoft Research</a></cite>)</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;We identify a surprising expressivity gap compared to functional programming with parameterized algebraic datatypes (PADTs): operations with natural definitions in ML and Haskell require unnatural and nonextensible object-oriented encodings to ensure safety. With the introduction of generics, virtual dispatch is no longer as expressive as functional case analysis.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 121-123</div></div><h2 id="Fexprs">Fexprs as the basis of Lisp function application or <code>$vau</code>: the ultimate abstraction</h2><p><a href="https://web.cs.wpi.edu/~jshutt/dissertation/etd-090110-124904-Shutt-Dissertation.pdf">Fexprs as the basis of Lisp function application or <code>$vau</code>: the ultimate abstraction</a> by <cite>John N. Shutt</cite> (<cite><a href="http://web.cs.wpi.edu/">Worcester Polytechnic Institute Computer Science Department</a></cite>)</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;[…] mostly avoids this element by concerning itself with semantics. However, the background chapters are also meant to discuss language design motivations, and psychology is integral to that discussion because it often dominates programmer productivity. Semantics may make some intended computations difcult to specify, but rarely makes them&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 5</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;background chapters are also meant to discuss language design motivations, and psychology is integral to that discussion because it often dominates programmer productivity. Semantics may make some intended computations difcult to specify, but rarely makes them impossible — especially in Lisp, which doesn’t practice strong typing; whereas psychological bias may prevent entire classes of computations outright, just by preventing programmers from intending them&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 5</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The acts of the mind, wherein it exerts its power over its simple ideas, are chiefy these three: (1) Combining several simple ideas into one compound one; and thus all complex ideas are made. (2) The second is bringing two ideas, whether simple or complex, together, so as to take a view of them at once, without uniting them into one; by which way it gets all its ideas of relations. (3) The third is separating them from all other ideas that accompany them in their real existence: this is called abstraction: and thus all its general ideas are made. — John Locke, An Essay Concerning Human Understanding ([Lo1690]), Bk. II Ch. xii §&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 21</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Classically, an extensible language consists of a sourcelevel base language together with meta-level defnitional facilities to extend the base language ([Chr69]). A program then consists of two parts, a meta-level part that specifes an extension of the base language followed by a source-level part written in the extended language&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 23</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Syntactic abstractions do not have to be macros. A class of non-macro syntactic abstractions is proposed, under the name micros, in [Kr01]; a micro specifes a transformation directly source-to-target (rather than source-to-source, as macros), which is clearly syntactic since its processing must be completed before the target abstract machine begins computation.8 Micros are a universal syntactic abstraction, in that they can be used to assign any possible (computable) semantics to source programs. (However, they won’t play a signifcant role in this dissertation, because they aren’t a traditional abstraction, so aren’t within the scope of the thesis.9)&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 24</div></div><p>This sounds like source generators.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;[…] the measure of the abstractive power of a programming language is the class of programming languages that it can readily specify — or, more to the point (but also more subjectively), the class of problem domains that the language, including its readily achieved abstractive extensions, can readily address.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 25</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Each extensible language is surrounded by an envelope of possible extensions reachable by modest amounts of labor by unsophisticated users&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 25</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;(Smoothness Conjecture) Every roughness (violation of smoothness) in a language design ultimately bounds its radius of abstraction.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 26</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The intuition here is that a butterfy efect occurs, in which the consequences of roughness are compounded by successive abstractions until, sooner or later depending on the degree of roughness, cumulative resistance drags down further abstraction through the fuzzy threshold from feasible to infeasible&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 26</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Programmers spend much of their time reasoning informally about programs. Formal reasoning about programs may be used, on occasion, to prove that particular programs are correct; but more powerfully, to prove that general classes of program transformations preserve the meanings of programs. The general transformations are then safe for use in meta-programs —such as optimizing compilers— and also for use in subsequent program correctness proofs&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 30</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Some languages, such as Haskell, allow argument evaluation to be postponed past the application of a compound function — lazy argument evaluation; but in general this takes out too much of the order of operations, so that the language interpreter must either do additional work to put back in some of the lost order, or else lose efciency.21 A few languages, such as Haskell, have taken the applicative trend to its logical extreme&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 32</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Some languages, such as Haskell, allow argument evaluation to be postponed past the application of a compound function — lazy argument evaluation; but in general this takes out too much of the order of operations, so that the language interpreter must either do additional work to put back in some of the lost order, or else lose efciency.21 A&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 32</div></div><p>Also, performance predictability, with unforeseeable lumps in the execution profile.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;It is not yet clear whether the mathematical models used in ‘monadic’ programming will eventually fnd a useful balance between expressiveness and simplicity&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 32</div></div><p>Hasn&rsquo;t really happened yet.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;We’re really referring to the notion of frst-class object, which was discussed in the Preface, and for which nameability by variables is just one particular requirement; but in Lisps, most objects nameable by variables have all the rights and privileges of frst-class-ness. Christopher Strachey, by the way, originally evolved the notion of frst-class value from W.V. Quine’s principle To be is to be the value of a variable ([La00]); and Quine, after deriving the principle in his essay “On What There Is” [Qu61, pp. 1–19], had applied it to reifcation in another essay, “Logic and the Reifcation of Universals” [Qu61, pp. 102–129].&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 36</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Technical simplicity would favor always using the double-quotes — but technical simplicity is a primary goal for expressions to be read by formal systems, not by the human audience. For the human audience our goal is accuracy of understanding, which is enhanced by ease of understanding but does not always correlate with technical simplicity, nor even with technical unambiguity&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 41</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The distinction intended is that modularity hides implementation, while abbreviation merely shortens expression.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 61-61</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Programming languages should be designed not by piling feature on top of feature, but by removing the weaknesses and restrictions that make additional features appear necessary.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 87</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Programmer-defined facilities should be able to duplicate all the capabilities and properties of built-in facilities&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 88</div></div><p>This is the principle I found most interesting, but it wasn&rsquo;t discussed.</p>
<h2 id="Regulating">Regulating the Sharing Economy</h2><p><a href="https://www.researchgate.net/publication/321069512_Regulating_the_Sharing_Economy">Regulating the Sharing Economy</a> by <cite>K. Erickson, I. S&oslash;rensen</cite></p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;[…] sharing platforms disrupt some of the fundamental assumptions underlying common law “special relationships.”75 Unlike two-party relationships between service providers and consumers, sharing platforms create three-party relationships between the platform, provider, and user. These new relationships require a different allocation of liability and statutory protection.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 350-353</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Sharing platforms must navigate rules promulgated by multiple agencies at both state and local levels. Second, the relevant local codes are complex and, as discussed in the previous Section, impose heightened compliance burdens on service providers.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 370-372</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;[…] sharing platforms also generate negative externalities for third parties. Short-term rentals can change the character of a building or even a community,97 and many residents object to finding strangers routinely entering the common areas of an apartment complex.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 419-421</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;P2P auction houses and per-task contractor services allow users to purchase temporary licenses, such as a position in line for a movie, a table in a coffee shop, or a public parking spot. Blurring these lines creates difficult legal issues because these categories affect determinations of liability in almost every field of law, from tax149 to civil rights.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 636-639</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;While Expedia, Priceline and Hotwire are best defined as retailers or resellers and, as such, can be controlled and taxed accordingly, it is much more difficult to find a comparable taxing analogue for the Internet-sharing economy.”).&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 646-648</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Insurance Commissioner Jones aptly summarized the “moral hazard” argument of TNCs: “(1) drivers may be running personal errands; (2) drivers may have multiple applications open at the same time; (3) drivers with low limits on their personal automobile insurance policy will turn on the application in the event of an accident to secure more robust coverage; and (4) drivers start to look more like employees or independent contractors if the TNC covers this period.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 688-691</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The two primary examples are auction platforms for public parking spaces and for seating in coffee houses or restaurants.177 Neither sellers nor purchasers “own” or “provide” the temporary license; the municipal government is responsible for maintaining public parking and restaurants are responsible for providing seating to customers. Many have criticized these platforms as parasitic, and claim that these services interfere with third-party rights. Bloggers have even coined the term “jerk tech” to describe these platforms.178 Others contend that auction houses optimize efficient use of scarce resources and prevent congestion; users who value a parking spot most can pay for that privilege, and price-sensitive users will accept less conveniently located spots.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 772-777</div></div><p>In other words, a pathologically sociopathic society that distributes resources only to those able to pay stupid amounts of money, a society that bubbles asshole criminals to the top. Kudos. This is obviously how it already works, but maybe don&rsquo;t supercharge it? You could do first come, first served, which this is, I guess. Feels wrong.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Unlike internet service providers, sharing companies are not passive; most platforms exercise at least some control over provider and user transactions, and almost all platforms have a financial stake in transactions between users and providers.216 This suggests that immunity for platforms is not appropriate.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 983-985</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The proper allocation of liability between users and providers on sharing platforms is highly contextual because both the least-cost avoider and the easiest target for enforcement agencies vary between and within 216. Sharing platforms impose a wide range of transaction fees. See supra note 27. Interchange fees might serve as an indirect measure of the degree of control a platform exercises over transactions.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 999-1006</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Since sharing platforms often operate on a large scale over multiple jurisdictions, the least-cost avoider for compliance may often be users and providers, who are most familiar with local rules and their own property. Moreover, casual and high volume providers may require different treatment. Yet in other situations platforms may be best positioned to address user or provider misconduct.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 1005-1008</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Tiered regulation properly allocates risk to repeat players who benefit most from the platform. For instance, providers who transact at volumes comparable to bed and breakfasts should incur similar liability to a traditional service provider. And TNC drivers who operate like full-time taxis should comply with safety standards comparable to taxis. In addition, tiered regulation levels the playing field between sharing platforms and traditional service providers, and discourages abuse of the platform.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 1031-1034</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;For example, several ordinances on TNCs restrict the maximum number of hours that a driver can operate per day, but some TNC platforms do not directly restrict drivers’ hours.226 If a TNC driver leaves the app on twenty four hours a day and recklessly accepts fares without adequate rest, should the platform have a duty to terminate that driver? The platform exercises sufficient control such that it represents both the least-cost avoider and easiest enforcement target.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 1040-1042</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;In some cases the public interest in allowing disclosure of rider logs may outweigh the rider’s privacy interest. For example, consulting firm Hamilton Places Strategies calculated based on congressional campaign filings that Members of Congress relied on Uber for sixty one percent of rides during the 2014 election cycle.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 1137-1139</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;[…] regulators should not simply allow the sharing economy to grow in the shadow of the law. Allowing the sharing economy to self-regulate would not adequately safeguard consumers. Thus, responsible regulation of sharing platforms is a necessity, not a choice.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 1425-1427</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Tom Slee, <a href="http://tomslee.net/2014/11/why-canada-should-de -activate-uber.html">Why Canada Should De-Activate Uber</a>, WHIMSLEY (Nov. 22, 2014), (“Contrary to the way some articles are written, we do have a choice here. A lot of the links above talk as if Uber were some kind of inevitable future. . . . Conflating Uber with the broad advance of technology is just wrong, and it’s also exactly what Uber wants us to do.”).&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 1433-1436</div></div><h2 id="Political">Political Aspects of Full Employment</h2><p><a href="https://pluto.huji.ac.il/~mshalev/ppe/Kalecki_FullEmployment.pdf">Political Aspects of Full Employment</a> by <cite>Michael Kalecki</cite> in 1942</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Under a laissez-faire system the level of employment depends to a great extent on the so-called state of confidence. If this deteriorates, private investment declines, which results in a fall of output and employment (both directly and through the secondary effect of the fall in incomes upon consumption and investment). This gives the capitalists a powerful indirect control over government policy: everything which may shake the state of confidence must be carefully avoided because it would cause an economic crisis. But once the government learns the trick of increasing employment by its own purchases, this powerful controlling device loses its effectiveness. Hence budget deficits necessary to carry out government intervention must be regarded as perilous.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 59-64</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;In practice, however, this is not the case. Indeed, subsidizing mass consumption is much more violently opposed by these experts than public investment. For here a moral principle of the highest importance is at stake. The fundamentals of capitalist ethics require that &lsquo;you shall earn your bread in sweat&rsquo;—unless you happen to have private means.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 76-78</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;[…] under a regime of permanent full employment, the &lsquo;sack&rsquo; would cease to play its role as a disciplinary measure. The social position of the boss would be undermined, and the self-assurance and class-consciousness of the working class would grow.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 81-82</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;In current discussions of these problems there emerges time and again the conception of counteracting the slump by stimulating private investment. This may be done by lowering the rate of interest, by the reduction of income tax, or by subsidizing private investment directly in this or another form. That such a scheme should be attractive to business is not surprising.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 115-118</div></div><p>Those ideas are still working great, nearly a century later.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The rate of interest or income tax is reduced in a slump but not increased in the subsequent boom. In this case the boom will last longer, but it must end in a new slump: one reduction in the rate of interest or income tax does not, of course, eliminate the forces which cause cyclical fluctuations in a capitalist economy. In the new slump it will be necessary to reduce the rate of interest or income tax again and so on. Thus in the not too remote future, the rate of interest would have to be negative and income tax would have to be replaced by an income subsidy.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 124-128</div></div><p>Ding, ding, ding.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;This state of affairs is perhaps symptomatic of the future economic regime of capitalist democracies. In the slump, either under the pressure of the masses, or even without it, public investment financed by borrowing will be undertaken to prevent large-scale unemployment. But if attempts are made to apply this method in order to maintain the high level of employment reached in the subsequent boom, strong opposition by business leaders is likely to be encountered.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 136-139</div></div><p>You got that right.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The pressure of all these forces, and in particular of big business—as a rule influential in government departments—would most probably induce the government to return to the orthodox policy of cutting down the budget deficit. A slump would follow in which government spending policy would again come into its own.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 143-145</div></div><p>Nothing new under the sun.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The rest of government spending necessary to maintain full employment should be used to subsidize consumption (through family allowances, old-age pensions, reduction in indirect taxation, and subsidizing necessities). Opponents of such government spending say that the government will then have nothing to show for their money. The reply is that the counterpart of this spending will be the higher standard of living of the masses.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 154-156</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The rest of government spending necessary to maintain full employment should be used to subsidize consumption (through family allowances, old-age pensions, reduction in indirect taxation, and subsidizing necessities). Opponents of such government spending say that the government will then have nothing to show for their money. The reply is that the counterpart of this spending will be the higher standard of living of the masses. Is not this the purpose of all economic activity? 2.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 154-157</div></div><p>Not according to the winners.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;If capitalism can adjust itself to full employment, a fundamental reform will have been incorporated in it. If not, it will show itself an outmoded system which must be scrapped.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 158-159</div></div><h2 id="Crypto">Crypto is the Mother of All Scams and (Now Busted) Bubbles While Blockchain Is The Most Over-Hyped Technology Ever, No Better than a Spreadsheet/Database</h2><p><a href="https://www.banking.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/Roubini%20Testimony%2010-11-18.pdf">Crypto is the Mother of All Scams and (Now Busted) Bubbles While Blockchain Is The Most Over-Hyped Technology Ever, No Better than a Spreadsheet/Database</a> in October 2018 (<cite><a href="http://www.banking.senate.gov/">Nouriel Roubini</a></cite>)</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;That means if a steady- state supply of Bitcoin really did gradually replace a fiat currency, the price index of all goods and services would continuously fall. By extension, any nominal debt contract denominated in Bitcoin would rise in real value over time, leading to the kind of debt deflation that economist Irving Fisher believed precipitated the Great Depression. At the same time, nominal wages in Bitcoin would increase forever in real terms, regardless of productivity growth, adding further to the likelihood of an economic disaster.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 73-77</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;[…] that mining is highly concentrated in oligopolies in shady and nontransparent and unsecure jurisdictions – China, Russia, Belarus, Georgia, etc. It also goes beyond the possibility and reality of massive and regular 51% attacks.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 160-161</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Fundamental flaws of lack of security in crypto land go well beyond the fact that mining is highly concentrated in oligopolies in shady and nontransparent and unsecure jurisdictions – China, Russia, Belarus, Georgia, etc. It also goes beyond the possibility and reality of massive and regular 51% attacks.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 159-161</div></div><p>Adorable that one of the most criminally damaging financial powers is never considered shady.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Blockchain’s ideology is politically born out of the same mentality as libertarian right wing conspiracies or extreme left anarchism: all governments, central banks, moneys, institutions, banks, corporations, entities with reputation and credibility build over centuries are evil centralized concentrations of power that literally need to be destroyed.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 192-195</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Everything that this study argues about the nefarious impact of China on Bitcoin can be said and applied to any other crypto-currency and to the role of Russia in the crypto eco-system.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 227-228</div></div><p>China has since forbidden mining, but sure the holy U.S. Need not be mentioned as nefarious.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;[…] wealth in crypto-land is more concentrated than in North Korea where the inequality Gini coefficient is 0.86 (it is 0.41 in the quite unequal US): the Gini coefficient for Bitcoin is an astonishing 0.88. <a href="https://davidgerard.co.uk/blockchain/ethereum-smart-contracts-in-practice/">6</a>  <a href="https://www.coindesk.com/the-dao-bitcoin-development/">7</a>  <a href="https://www.cbc.ca/news/technology/ethereum-hack-blockchain-fork-bitcoin-1.3719009">8</a>  <a href="https://davidgerard.co.uk/blockchain/ethereum-smart-contracts-in-practice/">9</a> Quite a feat to create an asset class where inequality is greater than that of Kim Jong-un land. So decentralization is just a total myth invented by a bunch of whales whose wealth is fake; now that the retail suckers who bought at the peak have literally lost their shirts these crypto “whales” are fake billionaires as liquefying their wealth would crash the price of the “asset” to zero.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 238-245</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Blockchain’s boosters would argue that its early days resemble the early days of the Internet, before it had commercial applications. But that comparison is simply false. Whereas the Internet quickly gave rise to email, the World Wide Web, and millions of viable commercial ventures used by billions of people in less than a decade, cryptocurrencies such as Bitcoin do not even fulfill their own stated purpose.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 245-248</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Crypto has been around for over a decade now and in 2018 the number of crypto wallets was only 22 million and out of this figure the number of active bitcoin users is only between 2.9 and 5.9 million and falling. And the number of crypto transactions has collapsed by at least 75% between 2017 and 2018.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 253-255</div></div><p>And it did it again in 2022.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The fact that everyone within a given country or jurisdiction uses the same currency is precisely what gives money its value. Money is a public good that allows individuals to enter into free exchange without having to resort to the kind of imprecise, inefficient bartering on which traditional societies depended.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 312-314</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;While every successful technological revolution includes some bubbles and some scammers, most of the real ones – like the internet − create real goods and services that billions of folks use around the world even after the initial frothiness and bubble has burst. And the criminal and scamming element in real technological revolutions is the exception, not the systemic rule that it is in crypto land.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 454-456</div></div><h2 id="Housing">The Housing Bubble and the Great Recession: Ten Years Later</h2><p><a href="https://cepr.net/images/stories/reports/housing-bubble-2018-09.pdf">The Housing Bubble and the Great Recession: Ten Years Later</a> by <cite>Dean Baker</cite> (<cite><a href="http://cepr.net/">CEPR</a></cite>)</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;It is common to speak about the collapse of the housing bubble and the financial crisis as unpredictable events that fell out of the sky without warning. While this may be a comforting view for the economists with jobs that required monitoring the economy, it is far from the reality. The housing bubble and the risks it posed were easy to see. It was only due to incredibly narrow-minded thinking that the vast majority of the economics profession managed to miss it.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 233-236</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Greenspan’s testimony should have served as a wake-up call to anyone who had not already been paying attention to the surge in house prices. At the time, Greenspan was by the far the most widely known economist in the world. He had been appointed as Fed chair by four different presidents. He was the subject of a fawning biography by Bob Woodward, appropriately titled “Maestro.” The business press largely revered him. Yet, in spite of Greenspan calling attention to the run-up in house prices, and providing no remotely plausible explanation based in the fundamentals of the housing market, the topic received virtually no attention from economists or the business press.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 272-277</div></div><p>Also, nobody fired Alan Greenspan.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Some conservatives actually argued for eliminating the FHA, claiming that Wall Street’s sophisticated ability to manage risk had made it obsolete.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 293-294</div></div><p>How is that in any way a conservative position? Deregulation is quite radical.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;There was no money in raising a warning flag that this story was not likely to have a happy ending. And, it turned out there were really no negative consequences for not raising a warning flag. Few, if any, economists lost a job or even missed a scheduled promotion because they didn’t see and warn about the dangers of the housing bubble. And as we all know, economists respond to incentives.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 319-322</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;In terms of total indebtedness, the key issue is not levels of debt, but ratios of debt service to disposable income. This ratio is actually at relatively low levels, according to data from the Federal Reserve Board.22 (The Fed constructs this ratio using both debt alone and also adding in rents since the latter can be viewed as a debt-like obligation that substitutes for a mortgage payment. Both ratios are near 40-year lows.)&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 390-393</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Credit cards do tend to be variable rate, and a small portion of mortgage debt and auto loan debt is variable rate, but there is no plausible story where a rise in interest rates will lead to large-scale defaults, even if it can be a major burden on the people carrying this debt.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 394-396</div></div><p>Sometimes he&rsquo;s just cold. Could spare a word or two about a system that drives the poorest into high-interest debt, that they&rsquo;re vulnerable even when the system is not.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Nothing like this can happen with student loan debt. If a student defaults, it may lead his friends to give more thought to default also, but it doesn’t directly reduce the earnings power of other students, which is the basis for loan repayments.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 401-403</div></div><p>You can&rsquo;t even default on those debts, can you?</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;But the fact that many former students face bleak financial prospects does not mean that the economy is facing an imminent crisis due to student loan defaults.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 404-405</div></div><p>See? Again, the fact that the next generation is in crisis is decoupled from the stability of the economy. The system works, even if everyone&rsquo;s miserable. Not a crisis!</p>
      </div>
      </div>
        <div class="footer">
    <div class="footer-data"><div class="footer-links"><ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/contact.php" title="">Contact</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/support.php" title="">Support</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/privacy.php" title="">Privacy</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/rights.php" title="">Rights</a></li></ul></div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="copyright">Copyright (c) 1999-2026 earthli.com. All Rights Reserved.</div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="versions">Powered by <ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore/app_news.php">earthli News 3.7</a></li><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore" title="">earthli WebCore&trade; 3.7</a></li></ul></div></div>    </div>
      </div>
  </div>  </body>
</html>
]]>
  </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
      <title type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[Perusing someone else's book list]]>
  </title>
    <id>https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=5888</id>
    <link href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=5888"/>
    <updated>2025-12-26T22:44:12+01:00</updated>
    <author>
        <name type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[Marco von Ballmoos]]>
  </name>
      <uri>https://earthli.com/users/marco</uri>
    </author>
      <summary type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<p><a href="https://www.earthli.com/data/news/attachments/entry/5888/burning_books.webp"><img title="Burning books" src="https://www.earthli.com/data/news/attachments/entry/5888/burning_books_tn.webp" alt=" " class=" align-right"></a>A friend forwarded me the page called <a href="https://sive.rs/book">Books I’ve read</a> by <cite>Derek Sivers</cite>, which is a long, long list of books. I perused it with the default ordering, from highest-rated to lowest-rated. [1] I didn&rsquo;t see a lot of overlap with my own reading interests. We&rsquo;d read only one or two books in common—out of hundreds!—and... [<a class="complete-text-link" href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=5888">More</a>]</p>
]]>
  </summary>
      <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<html lang="en">
  <head>
    <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/themes/ice.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/fonts/raleway.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/core/medium.css">
  </head>
  <body>
<div class="style-controls">  <div class="page">
    <div class="page-body">
<div class="info-box-top">
<p>
Published by <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_user.php?name=marco" title="Marco von Ballmoos" class="visible">marco</a> on <span class="date-time">26. Dec 2025 22:44:12 (GMT-5)</span>
</p>
</div>
      <div class="text-flow wide">
  <p><a href="https://www.earthli.com/data/news/attachments/entry/5888/burning_books.webp"><img title="Burning books" src="https://www.earthli.com/data/news/attachments/entry/5888/burning_books_tn.webp" alt=" " class=" align-right"></a>A friend forwarded me the page called <a href="https://sive.rs/book">Books I’ve read</a> by <cite>Derek Sivers</cite>, which is a long, long list of books. I perused it with the default ordering, from highest-rated to lowest-rated. [1] I didn&rsquo;t see a lot of overlap with my own reading interests. We&rsquo;d read only one or two books in common—out of hundreds!—and almost none of his books are on my wishlist.</p>
<h2>A cry for help</h2><p>There were a what I would call a disturbing number of financial self-help books, like <em>You Can Negotiate Anything</em>, <em>The Entrepreneur Roller Coaster</em>, general self-help books like <em>The Listening Book</em> or <em>The Courage to Be Disliked</em>, parenting books like <em>Brain Rules for Baby</em>, there&rsquo;s even a book by Tony Robbins! (<em>Awaken the Giant Within</em>, which he says <span class="quote-inline">&ldquo;changed everything about my life. It&rsquo;s my Bible&rdquo;</span> but which apparently still has room for improvement because he gave it only a 9 out of 10).</p>
<p>It&rsquo;s the kind of list of books that a good, liberal westerner will definitely want his friends to know he&rsquo;s read. Authors like Jonathan Haidt, Yuval Noah Harari, Jordan Peterson (for diversity!), Nassim Nichloas Taleb, David Brooks (sweet Lord no) feature prominently. A lot of these feel like books he picked up in an airport or single-click-impulse-bought from a Kindle screen or search ad.</p>
<p>Those were all 9/10 books. It&rsquo;s a long list.</p>
<h2>Programming stuff</h2><p>I found <em>Philosophy of Software Design − by John K. Ousterhout</em> in the 8/10 list, which I would probably read, except that I&rsquo;ve already read so much work by Ousterhout that I feel like I&rsquo;ve got the idea. <em>Code − by Charles Petzold</em> is another one that I&rsquo;ve read parts of in essays, but a whole book about the philosophy of coding … well, it&rsquo;s a bit late for me, at this stage in my education.</p>
<h2>More self-help books</h2><p>OMG there are so many more self-help books—<em>Four Thousand Weeks</em>, <em>How to Live on 24 Hours a Day</em>, <em>How to Think More Effectively</em>, <em>All I Really Need to Know I Learned in Kindergarten</em>—that I&rsquo;m going to stop listing them.</p>
<p>It&rsquo;s truly incredible how some people just can&rsquo;t seem to get enough of pop psychology and pop philosophy. The self-help books are almost outnumbered by the financial-advice books—<em>Discover Your Inner Economist</em>, <em>You, Inc − The Art of Selling Yourself</em>, <em>The Innovator&rsquo;s Solution</em>—so I&rsquo;m also going to stop listing those, even though there are still dozens of them.</p>
<h2>Two books in common</h2><p>Then I saw <em>Guns, Germs, and Steel − by Jared Diamond</em>, which is still technically on my list but I&rsquo;ll probably never get around to reading it. Winning a Pulitzer Prize makes it suspect for me, because that suggests to me that it&rsquo;s almost certainly anodyne enough that it doesn&rsquo;t offend any good liberal&rsquo;s pro-Empire, Orientalist stances, which  they&rsquo;ve clothed in humanism.</p>
<p><em>Thinking, Fast and Slow − by Daniel Kahneman</em> is on my list, though. So, there&rsquo;s one book. I think I might have read <em>Moonwalking with Einstein</em> but it was long ago and I&rsquo;ve completely forgotten what it was about. Ah, yes, reading his brief description, it was about &ldquo;memory palaces&rdquo;.</p>
<h2>Hate-reading</h2><p>This guy has read a <em>lot</em> of books that he didn&rsquo;t like. Half of this page is 6/10 or below. Like, no wonder. You can&rsquo;t just read whatever slop drifts beneath your gaze and expect to have fun. He hasn&rsquo;t read a single book for fun! No fiction, no original philosophy, everything filtered through someone else&rsquo;s presentation.</p>
<p>I scrolled &lsquo;til the end to see if he&rsquo;d hated a book that I&rsquo;d loved, but I didn&rsquo;t see anything.</p>
<h2>An example: Yuval Noah Harari</h2><p>Way down the list is a 2/10 review of <em>21 Lessons for the 21st Century − by Yuval Noah Harari</em>, which writes,</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;His book “Sapiens” was amazing, so I read this new one. It’s just some thoughts on our present and near future. Not so different from what you find in every-day articles. <strong>I’m personally averse to news commentaries, so I shouldn’t have read this.</strong>&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>I would be embarrassed to write that I was surprised to find that a book named <em>21 Lessons for the 21st Century</em> was <span class="quote-inline">&ldquo;just some thoughts on our present and near future, &rdquo;</span> but I also am not <span class="quote-inline">&ldquo;personally averse to news commentaries,&rdquo;</span> so we otherwise have almost nothing in common.</p>
<p>Imagine reading self-help books, financial-help books, and parenting books like a <em>fiend</em> but also some historical and cultural books, but not actually following any news or trying to fit what you&rsquo;ve learned into the world you live in. The mind reels. That feels even more pointless than what I&rsquo;m doing here. I&rsquo;m almost depressed for him. He might need help.</p>
<p>I&rsquo;ve not read <em>Sapiens</em> but I did read <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3709">Eine Kurze Geschichte der Menschheit</a>, for which I ended my review with,</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Harari is a good storyteller and summarizes many interesting facets of the sweep of history. However, he isn’t as opinionated as the facts he relates would require him to be. The result is that he looks either obtuse or biased. He shies away from judgment—and he’s too smart not to have noticed the natural conclusions to much of the information he cites. <strong>My gut feeling in some places was that he was hedging his bets so as to continue to be regarded favorably by the elites whose crimes he has partially documented.</strong> That is, he wants to sell his books and his presence, so he leaves the condemnation up to the reader.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><h2>United in hating <em>The Alchemist</em></h2><p>Ah, there&rsquo;s one! Right at the end! We both hated <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=2775#Alchemist">The Alchemist</a>. Where he wrote,</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;How is this so popular? Its weak message is “pay attention to serendipity”. I was open to liking it, but it gave me nothing I could use.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>I was, of course, harsher:</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Heavy-handed and saccharine doesn’t even begin to cover it. I have no idea where the metaphor ends and the literalism begins. I’m not even going to bother checking how many months this thing spent on Oprah’s best-seller list. Avoid this book.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><h2>The last straw: He hated Murakami</h2><p>Oh, and below that, he hated <em>What I Talk About When I Talk About Running</em> by Haruki Murakami. I just finished (and very much enjoyed) <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=5724">Norwegian Wood</a> and I loved <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=4688">Hard-Boiled Wonderland and the End of the World</a>. I can&rsquo;t imagine someone giving a Murakami book a 1/10.</p>
<h2>Nothing in common</h2><p>It&rsquo;s great that he published a list of all of the books that he&rsquo;s read. I can tell by this list, though, that a penchant for cataloguing books we&rsquo;ve read is all that we have in common. A conversation would most likely be painful for both of us.</p>
<p><hr></p>
<div class="footnote-reference"><span id="footnote_DRAFTABLE_ENTRY_5888_1_body" class="footnote-number">[1]</span> <p>Which, according to the <a href="https://sive.rs/bfaq">FAQ</a>, he defines as,</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;My 0-10 rating is not just how much I liked the book. It’s how strongly I would recommend it to almost anyone. So I would give a little lower rating to a book I loved about an obscure subject, like the culture of Switzerland, because I wouldn’t recommend it to most people.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>Which, like, fair enough, but a 1/10 is still a 1/10. I can&rsquo;t imagine that a book he would rate a book that he thinks is a 10/10 as a 1/10 just because he can&rsquo;t think of anyone else who would read it.</p>
<p>But, as I just spent the whole essay discussing, I don&rsquo;t really have my finger on the pulse of the author of this list.</p>
</div>      </div>
      </div>
        <div class="footer">
    <div class="footer-data"><div class="footer-links"><ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/contact.php" title="">Contact</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/support.php" title="">Support</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/privacy.php" title="">Privacy</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/rights.php" title="">Rights</a></li></ul></div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="copyright">Copyright (c) 1999-2026 earthli.com. All Rights Reserved.</div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="versions">Powered by <ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore/app_news.php">earthli News 3.7</a></li><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore" title="">earthli WebCore&trade; 3.7</a></li></ul></div></div>    </div>
      </div>
  </div>  </body>
</html>
]]>
  </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
      <title type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[Norwegian Wood by Haruki Murakami (1987) (read in 2025)]]>
  </title>
    <id>https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=5724</id>
    <link href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=5724"/>
    <updated>2025-12-26T22:40:56+01:00</updated>
    <author>
        <name type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[Marco von Ballmoos]]>
  </name>
      <uri>https://earthli.com/users/marco</uri>
    </author>
      <summary type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<p><small class="notes">Standard disclaimer [1]</small></p>
<p><a href="https://www.earthli.com/data/news/attachments/entry/5724/norwegian_wood_by_haruki_murakami.webp"><img title="Norwegian Wood by Haruki Murakami" src="https://www.earthli.com/data/news/attachments/entry/5724/norwegian_wood_by_haruki_murakami_tn.webp" alt=" " class=" align-right"></a>This is my second Murakami book. While the subject matter is very, very different—this one&rsquo;s a love story whereas <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=4688">Hard-Boiled Wonderland and the End of the World</a> was a sci-fi, crime-novel, philosophical excursion—the <em>coolness</em> of the protagonist and the <em>mood</em> of the writing... [<a class="complete-text-link" href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=5724">More</a>]</p>
]]>
  </summary>
      <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<html lang="en">
  <head>
    <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/themes/ice.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/fonts/raleway.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/core/medium.css">
  </head>
  <body>
<div class="style-controls">  <div class="page">
    <div class="page-body">
<div class="info-box-top">
<p>
Published by <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_user.php?name=marco" title="Marco von Ballmoos" class="visible">marco</a> on <span class="date-time">26. Dec 2025 22:40:56 (GMT-5)</span>
</p>
<p>
Updated by <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_user.php?name=marco" title="Marco von Ballmoos" class="visible">marco</a> on <span class="date-time">29. Dec 2025 09:37:31 (GMT-5)</span>
</p>
</div>
      <div class="text-flow wide">
  <p><small class="notes">Standard disclaimer [1]</small></p>
<p><a href="https://www.earthli.com/data/news/attachments/entry/5724/norwegian_wood_by_haruki_murakami.webp"><img title="Norwegian Wood by Haruki Murakami" src="https://www.earthli.com/data/news/attachments/entry/5724/norwegian_wood_by_haruki_murakami_tn.webp" alt=" " class=" align-right"></a>This is my second Murakami book. While the subject matter is very, very different—this one&rsquo;s a love story whereas <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=4688">Hard-Boiled Wonderland and the End of the World</a> was a sci-fi, crime-novel, philosophical excursion—the <em>coolness</em> of the protagonist and the <em>mood</em> of the writing is the same. And I loved both the protagonist and the mood. This book relaxed me.</p>
<p>This is a book for people who read and people who listen to music. It is a book of its time, written and published a good decade before even the first hints of what would become the Internet were available. It reminds us of a time when it was possible to spend an entire Sunday re-reading a book, when it was possible to miss someone dearly and still not be able to communicate with them.</p>
<p>It is a story of a world that still has <em>distance</em> and <em>time</em>, a world where everything hasn&rsquo;t yet been compressed into instantaneity, a world that not only accommodated patience, not only encouraged it, but <em>required</em> it. There was less room for the luxury of hyperactivity, for flitting from thing to thing, for insatiety.</p>
<p>It is a world where two people—Toru and Nagasawa—at a school can become friends because they read authors in common. They are Japanese students and all of the authors are Western.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;“What kind of authors do you like?” I asked, speaking in respectful tones to this man two years my senior.</p>
<p>&ldquo;“Balzac, Dante, Joseph Conrad, Dickens,” he answered without hesitation. “Not exactly fashionable.” “That’s why I read them. If you only read the books that everyone else is reading, you can only think what everyone else is thinking. […]&rdquo;&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 38</div></div><p>Our narrator this time is a nineteen-year-old student Toru Watanabe. He is a young student, getting settled in to university in Tokyo. He has a bit of an odd duck of a roommate that every nicknames &ldquo;Storm Trooper&rdquo; because he&rsquo;s so strict. In what would set the tone for this book—and for Toru&rsquo;s life—he learned from what many others would consider to be an unbearable adversity. Instead of getting rid of the adversity, he accommodates it and learns from it. He learns from Storm Trooper how to keep his room neat. He learns how to take care of himself.</p>
<p>In the beginning of the book, we read a bit more about what Toru thinks of his fellows students.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;[…] What a joke. The wind changes direction a little, and their cries become whispers. Hey, Kizuki, I thought, you’re not missing a damn thing. This world is a piece of shit. The arseholes are getting good marks and helping to create a society in their own disgusting image.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 61</div></div><p>But his university life soon fades into the background, dominated by his extracurricular life.</p>
<p>Toru had grown up with two friends, Naoko and her boyfriend Kizuki. Kizuki committed suicide before they graduated. Toru is still very good friends with Naoko—he is, in fact, in love with her. She is also in love with him but Kizuki&rsquo;s suicide dealt her a damaging blow, one that not only prevents her from reciprocating his love in anything approaching a comprehensible way but would end up dooming her.</p>
<p>We watch as Toru learns from this adversity as well, the adversity of being in love with someone who&rsquo;s wonderful and nice to him, but who cannot express herself very well, who is inadvertently odd and distanced. He learns to write letters. He learns meditative patience. He studies and learns. He uses Naoko as his lodestar, he betters himself to be better for her.</p>
<p>Nagasawa, Toru&rsquo;s friend at school, is an exceedingly capable, though aloof, student, who comes from money, and will succeed no matter what. He is friends with Toru, nearly exclusively. Nagasawa has a girlfriend Hatsumi who will probably become his wife. They go out together sometimes, where she seems quite sweet on Toru, in a way that is quite reminiscent of his relationship with Kizuki and Naoko. Nagasawa doesn&rsquo;t care because he knows she won&rsquo;t go anywhere—she&rsquo;s deeply in love with him, despite his known infidelities—and that everything always goes his way. The world would not disappoint him, in this regard.</p>
<p>After spending some time with Toru in Tokyo, after they&rsquo;ve established something of a routine, Naoko has a breakdown and is forced to leave school,  moving to a psychiatric-care institution in the deep countryside. She lives in a house there with Reiko, a woman who&rsquo;s been there for seven years—she&rsquo;s in her 30s. They work at the settlement, growing food in the outdoor garden and the greenhouse.</p>
<p>With Naoko gone, Toru misses her deeply, continuing and even extending his monastic existence. A fellow student Midori throws herself into his life, spending a lot of time with him, even though she has a boyfriend. His relationship with Midori kind of mirrors the one that he had with Naoko in Tokyo. They take walks. They go drinking together. [2] They circle around maybe, possibly, fooling around.</p>
<p>Women just generally seem to like Toru. He has a low-key, philosophical air about him that amuses and entices them. Nearly every woman in this book seems to be somewhat attracted to him. It&rsquo;s not hard to understand why. He is understated and charming.</p>
<p>It is his love for Naoko that he causes him to stumble, to act other than nobly. He is so in love with her—and he is so afraid of being immoral or doing something that he will regret or thinks might be unfair to anyone—that he ends up mistreating Midori. She is a spitfire and also not the easiest person to get along with, carrying a lot of emotional baggage, but she loves him, it&rsquo;s obvious.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;“I think you look better now than you did before,” I said. And I meant it. As far as I could recall, with long hair she had been just another cute student. A fresh and physical life force surged from the girl who sat before me now. She was like a small animal that has popped into the world with the coming of spring. Her eyes moved like an independent organism with joy, laughter, anger, amazement and despair. I hadn’t seen a face so vivid and expressive in ages, and I enjoyed watching it live and move.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 66</div></div><p>Midori—unlike Naoko—is very self-sufficient, running her parents&rsquo; bookshop with her sister and caring for her terminally ill father. She cooks, she carouses, she&rsquo;s a mischievous imp. She&rsquo;s fun. She&rsquo;s a bit crazy and a bit needy but perhaps she&rsquo;s just what Toru needs to shake him out of the malaise into which he allows himself to occasionally drift. He is the master of no-decision is not a decision.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;I sipped my beer and focused on Midori as she went on cooking, her back to me. She worked with quick, nimble movements, handling no fewer than four cooking procedures at once. Over here she tasted a boiled dish, and the next second she was at the cutting board, rat-tat-tatting, then she took something out of the fridge and piled it in a bowl, and before I knew it she had washed a pot she had finished using. From the back she looked like an Indian percussionist – ringing a bell, tapping a block, striking a water-buffalo bone, each movement precise&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 86</div></div><p>Toru takes a trip to the countryside to visit Naoko in her asylum and becomes good friends with her roommate Reiko, who confides in him—both her own stories and stories that Naoko has told her. Reiko used to be a piano prodigy but became a piano teacher after having had a crisis of confidence herself.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;I suppose I didn’t want to think of myself that way, but once I reached a certain age and had attained a degree of self-knowledge I realized it was true after all: I’m good at teaching people things. Really good.”</p>
<p>&ldquo;“I bet you are.&ldquo;</p>
<p>&ldquo;“I have a lot more patience for others than I have for myself, and I’m much better at bringing out the best in others than in myself. That’s just the kind of person I am. I’m the scratchy stuff on the side of the matchbox. But that’s fine with me. I don’t mind at all. Better to be a first-class matchbox than a second-class match.&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 197</div></div><p>They cook, they garden, they walk in the snow. The three of them listen to music, both on records and played by Reiko on the guitar—Naoko&rsquo;s favorite is <em>Norwegian Wood</em> by the Beatles. It&rsquo;s peaceful. It&rsquo;s languorous. It proceeds at its own pace, with a maturity that is difficult to believe in 20-year-olds but also just incredibly welcome to experience through Murakami&rsquo;s evocative writing. There are deep themes of emotional duress but there is no little drama, so little unwarranted angst.</p>
<p>Toru loves Naoko with every fiber of his being. He builds his life around his visits to her, and around his plans for her return to Tokyo when she is &ldquo;well&rdquo;.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Where the road sloped upwards beyond the trees, I sat and looked towards the building where Naoko lived. It was easy to tell her room. All I had to do was find the one window towards the back where a faint light trembled. I focused on that point of light for a long, long time. It made me think of something like the final pulse of a soul’s dying embers. I wanted to cup my hands over what was left and keep it alive. I went on watching it the way Jay Gatsby watched that tiny light on the opposite shore night after night.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 149</div></div><p>But things start to get more serious with Midori—not physically, but intellectually. They discuss Marx, fake revolutionaries, sellouts, the working class, the tax man, the rich, and porno theaters. Toru meets her dying father and cares for him for a day. This endears Midori to him deeply because he did it so skillfully, so selflessly, so matter-of-factly, without any ulterior motive. She had an afternoon off from her otherwise stressful life and didn&rsquo;t have to pay for it. He was a friend.</p>
<p>She appreciates him for what he is, falling in love a bit more each time. He is diligent and focused. He is also still writing to  Naoko once a week. He describes to her how he lives—how he &ldquo;winds his spring&rdquo;—telling Naoko that he is improving himself for her.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;I miss you terribly sometimes, but in general I go on living with all the energy I can muster. Just as you take care of the birds and the fields every morning, every morning I wind my own spring. I give it some 36 good twists by the time I’ve got up, brushed my teeth, shaved, eaten breakfast, changed my clothes, left the dorm, and arrived at the university. I tell myself, “OK, let’s make this day another good one.” I hadn’t noticed before, but they tell me I talk to myself a lot these days. Probably mumbling to myself while I wind my spring.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 260</div></div><p>He writes and writes and writes in the hopes that he can give her a will to live by telling her about what her condition doesn&rsquo;t allow her to truly appreciate—while Midori is <em>right there</em> and does very much appreciate it.</p>
<p>For his next year of university, Toru moves nearly out of the city, far on the outskirts, where he has a groundskeeper&rsquo;s house to himself, shared only with a few stray cats. He hones his cooking skills, he studies diligently, he takes a job in an Italian restaurant, he learns Italian recipes. He takes care of the garden. He builds furniture. He befriends another student Itoh, his first male friend since Nagasawa.</p>
<p>Toru&rsquo;s letter-writing ritual is part of his life, probably part of what makes him so thoughtful, so introspective.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;I sat at my desk to write my Sunday morning letter to Naoko, drinking coffee from a big cup and listening to old Miles Davis albums. A fine rain was falling outside, while my room had the chill of an aquarium. The smell of mothballs lingered in the thick jumper I had just taken out of a storage box. High up on the window-pane clung a huge, fat fly, unmoving.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 285</div></div><p>Doesn&rsquo;t that sound nice? Don&rsquo;t you want to be there? It&rsquo;s not in the citation above, but you can almost see the large, white cat sunning itself on the floor, in the late-afternoon light shining through the panes of an open window that lets in the coolish autumn air.</p>
<p>But Toru was too focused on getting himself all set up in his suburban life—and he forgot to tell Midori where he&rsquo;d gone. She makes him suffer for it, keeping him incommunicado for months. Toru writes to Reiko to ask for her advice. She says to go for it. Do not wait for Naoko. She&rsquo;s not doing as well as Toru wishes she were.</p>
<p>Some time passes. Midori is still silent. Toru is going day to day, learning, working, feeding cats, gardening.</p>
<p>Naoko has killed herself. Toru is in bits. He leaves on a trip, with no plans, no destination. He lives on the land, working for scraps, nearly starving himself. On a beach, a gentle soul brings him food, even gives him money. Toru uses the money to finally return to Tokyo, after a long month on the road, talking to no-one.</p>
<p>Reiko visits, finally having left the sanitarium. She stays with Toru. She plays the guitar—a nearly impossible number of songs—while they drink and she smokes. Eventually, they end up in bed together, neither of them having had sex in ages. It is, of course, amazing. This is a conclusion to another part of his life, though. Reiko moves on the next day. Toru has decided. He calls Midori. She finally answers.</p>
<p><span class="quote-inline">&ldquo;Where are you now?&rdquo;</span></p>
<p>That&rsquo;s a good question, isn&rsquo;t it Toru? Don&rsquo;t think. Just answer.</p>
<p><hr></p>
<div class="footnote-reference"><span id="footnote_DRAFTABLE_ENTRY_5724_1_body" class="footnote-number">[1]</span> Disclaimer: these are notes I took while reading this book. They include citations I found interesting or enlightening or particularly well-written. In some cases, I&rsquo;ve pointed out which of these applies to which citation; in others, I have not. Any benefit you gain from reading these notes is purely incidental to the purpose they serve of reminding me of what I once read. Please see Wikipedia for a summary if I&rsquo;ve failed to provide one sufficient for your purposes. If my notes serve to trigger an interest in this book, then I&rsquo;m happy for you.</div><div class="footnote-reference"><span id="footnote_DRAFTABLE_ENTRY_5724_2_body" class="footnote-number">[2]</span> Nearly everyone in this book can drink <em>prodigious</em> amounts of alcohol and just bounce back the next day without a hint of damage. There are the classic scenes or two people polishing off two bottles of wine, shifting to a bottle of whiskey that also clatters to the ground, empty, and then they fall into bed for four bouts of lovemaking that starts at three in the morning. It&rsquo;s fun to read but it&rsquo;s not particularly believable. I&rsquo;ll admit that my skepticism might be influenced by my not remembering ever having been that invulnerable, even at that age, but hey, creative license.</div><h2>Citations</h2><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;“What kind of authors do you like?” I asked, speaking in respectful tones to this man two years my senior.</p>
<p>&ldquo;“Balzac, Dante, Joseph Conrad, Dickens,” he answered without hesitation. “Not exactly fashionable.” “That’s why I read them. If you only read the books that everyone else is reading, you can only think what everyone else is thinking. […]&rdquo;&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 38</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Nagasawa had a certain inborn quality that drew people to him and made them follow him. He knew how to stand at the head of the pack, to assess the situation, to give precise and tactful instructions that others would obey. Above his head hung an aura that revealed his powers like an angel’s halo, the mere sight of which would inspire awe in people for this superior being. Which is why it shocked everyone that Nagasawa chose me, a person with no distinctive qualities, to be his special friend. People I hardly knew treated me with a certain respect because of it, but what they did not seem to realize was that the reason for my having been chosen was a simple one, namely that I treated Nagasawa with none of the adulation he received from other people.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 39</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;When the strike was defused and lectures started up again under police occupation, the first ones to take their seats in the classrooms were those arseholes who had led the strike. As if nothing had ever happened, they sat there taking notes and answering “present” when the register was taken. I found this incredible. After all, the strike was still in effect. There had been no declaration bringing it to an end. All that had happened was that the university had called in the riot police and torn down the barricades, but the strike itself was supposed to be continuing. The arseholes had screamed their heads off at the time of the strike, denouncing students who opposed it (or just expressed doubts about it), at times even trying them in their own kangaroo courts. I made a point of visiting those former leaders and asking why they were attending lectures instead of continuing to strike, but they couldn’t give me a straight answer. What could they have said? That they were afraid of losing marks through lack of attendance? To think that these idiots had been the ones screaming for the dismantling of the university! What a joke. The wind changes direction a little, and their cries become whispers. Hey, Kizuki, I thought, you’re not missing a damn thing. This world is a piece of shit. The arseholes are getting good marks and helping to create a society in their own disgusting image.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 61</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;“I think you look better now than you did before,” I said. And I meant it. As far as I could recall, with long hair she had been just another cute student. A fresh and physical life force surged from the girl who sat before me now. She was like a small animal that has popped into the world with the coming of spring. Her eyes moved like an independent organism with joy, laughter, anger, amazement and despair. I hadn’t seen a face so vivid and expressive in ages, and I enjoyed watching it live and move.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 66</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;The short one walked up to the professor and said, with a degree of politeness, that they would like to use the second half of his lecture for political debate and hoped that he would cooperate, adding, “The world is full of problems far more urgent and relevant than Greek tragedy.”</p>
<p>&ldquo;This was more an announcement than a request. The professor replied, “I rather doubt that the world has problems far more urgent and relevant than Greek tragedy, but you’re not going to listen to anything I have to say, so do what you like.”&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 74</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;I sipped my beer and focused on Midori as she went on cooking, her back to me. She worked with quick, nimble movements, handling no fewer than four cooking procedures at once. Over here she tasted a boiled dish, and the next second she was at the cutting board, rat-tat-tatting, then she took something out of the fridge and piled it in a bowl, and before I knew it she had washed a pot she had finished using. From the back she looked like an Indian percussionist – ringing a bell, tapping a block, striking a water-buffalo bone, each movement precise&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 86</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;“You’re very clear about what you like and what you don’t like,” she said.</p>
<p>&ldquo;“Maybe so,” I said. “Maybe that’s why people don’t like me. Never have.”</p>
<p>&ldquo;“It’s because you show it,” she said. “You make it obvious you don’t care whether people like you or not. That makes some people angry.” She spoke in a near mumble, chin in hand. “But I like talking to you. The way you talk is so unusual. ‘I don’t like having something control me that way’.”&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 92</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;She looked into my eyes, and I into hers. I put my arm around her and kissed her. The slightest twinge went through her shoulders, and then she relaxed and closed her eyes for several seconds. The early autumn sun cast the shadow of her lashes on her cheek, and I could see it trembling in outline. It was a soft and gentle kiss, one not meant to lead beyond itself. I would probably not have kissed Midori that day if we hadn’t spent the afternoon on the laundry deck in the sun, drinking beer and watching a fire, and she no doubt felt the same. After a long time of watching the glittering rooftops and the smoke and the red dragonflies and other things, we had felt something warm and close, and we both probably wanted, half-consciously, to preserve that mood in some form. It was that kind of kiss. But as with all kisses, it was not without a certain element of danger.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 102</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Reiko and I left the main building, crossed a hill, and passed by a pool, some tennis courts, and a basketball court. Two men – one thin and middle-aged, the other young and fat – were on a tennis court. Both used their racquets well, but to me the game they were playing could not have been tennis. It seemed as if the two of them had a special interest in the bounce of tennis balls and were doing research in that area. They slammed the ball back and forth with a kind of strange concentration.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 132</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Where the road sloped upwards beyond the trees, I sat and looked towards the building where Naoko lived. It was easy to tell her room. All I had to do was find the one window towards the back where a faint light trembled. I focused on that point of light for a long, long time. It made me think of something like the final pulse of a soul’s dying embers. I wanted to cup my hands over what was left and keep it alive. I went on watching it the way Jay Gatsby watched that tiny light on the opposite shore night after night.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 149</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Three days later the girl came to the house by herself. She was an absolute angel, with a kind of pure, sweet, transparent beauty. I had never – and have never – seen such a beautiful little girl. She had long, shiny hair as black as freshly ground Indian ink, slim, graceful arms and legs, bright eyes, and a soft little mouth that looked as if someone had just made it. I couldn’t speak when I first saw her, she was so beautiful. Sitting on my sofa, she turned my living room into a gorgeous parlour. It hurt to look directly at her: I had to squint. So, anyway, that’s what she was like. I can still picture her clearly.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 160</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Naoko slipped the gown from her shoulders and threw it off completely like an insect shedding its skin. She had been wearing nothing under the gown. All she had on was the butterfly hairslide. Naked now, and still kneeling by the bed, she looked at me. Bathed in the soft light of the moon, Naoko’s body had the heartbreaking lustre of newborn flesh. When she moved – and she did so almost imperceptibly – the play of light and shadow on her body shifted subtly. The swelling roundness of her breasts, her tiny nipples, the indentation of her navel, her hipbones and pubic hair, all cast grainy shadows, the shapes of which kept changing like ripples spreading over the calm surface of a lake. What perfect flesh! I thought. When had Naoko come to possess such a perfect body? What had happened to the body I held in my arms that night last spring? A sense of imperfection had been what Naoko’s body had given me that night as I tenderly undressed her while she cried. Her breasts had seemed hard, the nipples oddly jutting, the hips strangely rigid. She was a beautiful girl, of course, her body marvellous and alluring. It aroused me that night and swept me along with a gigantic force. But still, as I held her and caressed her and kissed her naked flesh, I felt a strange and powerful awareness of the imbalance and awkwardness of the human body. Holding Naoko in my arms, I wanted to explain to her, “I am having sex with you now. I am inside you. But really this is nothing. It doesn’t matter. It is nothing but the joining of two bodies. All we are doing is telling each other things that can only be told by the rubbing together of two imperfect lumps of flesh. By doing this, we are sharing our imperfection.” But of course I could never have said such a thing with any hope of being understood. I just went on holding her tightly. And as I did so, I was able to feel inside her body some kind of stony foreign matter, something extra that I could never draw close to. And that sensation both filled my heart for Naoko and gave my erection a terrifying intensity. The body that Naoko revealed before me now, though, was nothing like the one I had held that night. This flesh had been through many changes to be reborn in utter perfection beneath the light of the moon. All signs of girlish plumpness had been stripped away since Kizuki’s death to be replaced by the flesh of a mature woman. So perfect was Naoko’s physical beauty now that it aroused nothing sexual in me. I could only stare, astounded, at the lovely curve from waist to hips, the rounded richness of the breasts, the gentle movement with each breath of the slim belly and the soft, black pubic shadow beneath.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 173</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Brahms’ Second Piano Concerto&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 193</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;I suppose I didn’t want to think of myself that way, but once I reached a certain age and had attained a degree of self-knowledge I realized it was true after all: I’m good at teaching people things. Really good.”</p>
<p>&ldquo;“I bet you are.&ldquo;</p>
<p>&ldquo;“I have a lot more patience for others than I have for myself, and I’m much better at bringing out the best in others than in myself. That’s just the kind of person I am. I’m the scratchy stuff on the side of the matchbox. But that’s fine with me. I don’t mind at all. Better to be a first-class matchbox than a second-class match.&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 197</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;I nodded in the darkness. I could feel the full shape of her breasts against me. I traced the outline of her body through her gown with the flat of my hand. From shoulder to back to hips, I ran my hand over her again and again, driving the line and the softness of her body into my brain. After we had been in this gentle embrace for a while, Naoko touched her lips to my forehead and slipped out of bed. I could see her pale blue gown flash in the darkness like a fish. “Goodbye,” she called in a tiny voice. Listening to the rain, I dropped into a gentle sleep.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 215</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;People are always trying to force stuff on me. The minute they see me they start telling me what to do. At least you don’t try to force stuff on me.”</p>
<p>&ldquo;“I don’t know you well enough to force stuff on you.”</p>
<p>&ldquo;“You mean, if you knew me better, you’d force stuff on me like everyone else?”</p>
<p>&ldquo;“It’s possible,” I said. “That’s how people live in the real world: forcing stuff on each other.”&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 224</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;“Tell me, Watanabe,” Midori said, looking up at the dorm buildings, “do all the guys in here wank – rub-a-dub-dub?”</p>
<p>&ldquo;“Probably,” I said. “Do guys think about girls when they do that?”</p>
<p>&ldquo;“I suppose so. I kind of doubt that anyone thinks about the stock market or verb conjugations or the Suez Canal when they wank. Nope, I’m pretty sure just about everybody thinks about girls.”&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 228</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;Without warning, she asked me, “Hey, Watanabe, can you explain the difference between the English present subjunctive and past subjunctive?”</p>
<p>&ldquo;“I think I can,” I said.</p>
<p>&ldquo;“Let me ask you, then, what possible use is stuff like that for everyday life?”</p>
<p>&ldquo;“None at all,” I said. “It may not serve any concrete purpose, but it does give you some kind of training to help you grasp things in general more systematically.” </p>
<p>&ldquo;Midori gave that a moment’s serious thought. “You’re amazing,” she said. “That never occurred to me before. I always thought of things like the subjunctive case and differential calculus and chemical symbols as totally useless. A pain in the neck. So I’ve always ignored them. Now I have to wonder if my whole life has been a mistake.”</p>
<p>&ldquo;“You’ve ignored them?”</p>
<p>&ldquo;“Yeah. Like, for me, they didn’t exist. I don’t have the slightest idea what ‘sine’ and ‘cosine’ mean.”</p>
<p>&ldquo;“That’s incredible! How did you pass your exams? How did you get into university?” </p>
<p>&ldquo;“Don’t be silly,” said Midori. “You don’t have to know anything to pass entrance exams! All you need is a little intuition – and I have great intuition. ‘Choose the correct answer from the following three.’ I know immediately which one is right.” </p>
<p>&ldquo;“My intuition’s not as good as yours, so I have to be systematic to some extent. Like the way a magpie collects bits of glass in a hollow tree.”</p>
<p>&ldquo;“Does it serve some purpose?” “I wonder. It probably makes it easier to do some things.”</p>
<p>&ldquo;“What kind of things? Give me an example.”</p>
<p>&ldquo;“Metaphysical thought, say. Mastering several languages.”</p>
<p>&ldquo;“What good does that do?” “It depends on the person who does it. It serves a purpose for some, and not for others. But mainly it’s training. Whether it serves a purpose or not is another question. Like I said.”&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 232</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;“Have you ever read Das Kapital?”</p>
<p>&ldquo;“Yeah. Not the whole thing, of course, but parts, like most people.”</p>
<p>&ldquo;“Did you understand it?”</p>
<p>&ldquo;“I understood some bits, not others. You have to acquire the necessary intellectual apparatus to read a book like Das Kapital. I think I understand the general idea of Marxism, though.”</p>
<p>&ldquo;“Do you think a first-year student who hasn’t read books like that can understand Das Kapital just by reading it?”</p>
<p>&ldquo;“That’s pretty nigh impossible, I’d say.”&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 233</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;I’m working class. But it’s the working class that keeps the world running, and it’s the working classes that get exploited. What kind of revolution is it that just throws out big words that working-class people can’t understand? What kind of crap social revolution is that? I mean, I’d like to make the world a better place, too. If somebody’s really being exploited, we’ve got to put a stop to it.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 234</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;“So that’s when it hit me. These guys are fakes. All they’ve got on their minds is impressing the new girls with the big words they’re so proud of, while sticking their hands up their skirts. And when they graduate, they cut their hair short and march off to work for Mitsubishi or IBM or Fuji Bank. They marry pretty wives who’ve never read Marx.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 235</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;They come barging in and acting big. ‘What’s this ledger for?’ ‘Hey, you keep pretty sloppy records.’ ‘You call this a business expense?’ ‘I want to see all your receipts right now .’ Meanwhile, we’re crouching in the corner, and when suppertime comes we have to treat them to sushi deluxe – home delivered. Let me tell you, though, my father never once cheated on his taxes. That’s just how he is, a real old-fashioned straight arrow. But tell that to the taxman. All he can do is dig and dig and dig and dig. ‘Income’s a little low here, don’t you think?’ Well, of course the income’s low when you’re not making any money! I wanted to scream: ‘Go do this where they’ve got some money!’ Do you think the taxman’s attitude would change if there was a revolution?”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 236</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;You knew when you saw those eyes he was going to die soon. There was no sign of life in his flesh, just the barest trace of what had once been a life. His body was like a dilapidated old house from which all the fixtures and fittings have been removed, awaiting its final demolition. Around the dry lips clumps of whiskers sprouted like weeds. So, I thought, even after so much of a man’s life force has been lost, his beard continues to grow.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 238</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;“You’ve watched too many porno movies,” I said with a laugh.</p>
<p>&ldquo;“You think so? I was kind of worried about that. But I love porn films. Take me to one next time, OK?”</p>
<p>&ldquo;“Fine,” I said. “Next time you’re free.”</p>
<p>&ldquo;“Really? I can hardly wait. Let’s go to a real S&amp;M one, with whips and, like, they make the girl pee in front of everyone. That’s my favourite.”</p>
<p>&ldquo;“We’ll do it.”</p>
<p>&ldquo;“You know what I like best about porn cinemas?”</p>
<p>&ldquo;“I couldn’t begin to guess.”</p>
<p>&ldquo;“Whenever a sex scene starts, you can hear this ‘Gulp!’ sound when everybody swallows all at once,” said Midori. “I love that ‘Gulp!’ It’s so sweet!”&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 242</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;“Would you like something to drink? Water? Juice?” I asked Midori’s father.</p>
<p>&ldquo;‹Cucumber› he said.</p>
<p>&ldquo;“Great,” I said with a smile. “With nori?”</p>
<p>&ldquo;He gave a little nod. I cranked the bed up again. Then I cut a bite-sized piece of cucumber, wrapped it with a strip of nori, stabbed the combination with a toothpick, dipped it in soy sauce, and delivered it to the patient’s waiting mouth. With almost no change of expression, Midori’s father crunched down on the piece again and again and finally swallowed it.</p>
<p>&ldquo;“How was that? Good, huh?”</p>
<p>&ldquo;‹Good› he said.</p>
<p>&ldquo;“It’s good when food tastes good,” I said. “It’s kind of like proof you’re alive.”</p>
<p>&ldquo;He ended up eating the entire cucumber.&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 251</div></div><p>This is why I read Murakami.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;I miss you terribly sometimes, but in general I go on living with all the energy I can muster. Just as you take care of the birds and the fields every morning, every morning I wind my own spring. I give it some 36 good twists by the time I’ve got up, brushed my teeth, shaved, eaten breakfast, changed my clothes, left the dorm, and arrived at the university. I tell myself, “OK, let’s make this day another good one.” I hadn’t noticed before, but they tell me I talk to myself a lot these days. Probably mumbling to myself while I wind my spring.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 260</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;[…] he had died on a Friday morning when a cold rain was falling, and now it was impossible to know the truth. I imagined that, in death, he had shrivelled up smaller than ever. And then they had burned him in an oven until he was nothing but ashes. And what had he left behind? A nothing-much bookshop in a nothing-much neighbourhood and two daughters, at least one of whom was more than a little strange. What kind of life was that? I wondered. Lying in that hospital bed with his cut-open head and his muddled brain, what had been on his mind as he looked at me?&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 261</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;I’m going to give it 100 per cent and go as far as I can. I’ll take what I want and leave what I don’t want. That’s how I intend to live my life, and if things go bad, I’ll stop and reconsider at that point. If you think about it, an unfair society is a society that makes it possible for you to exploit your abilities to the limit.”</p>
<p>&ldquo;“Sounds like a pretty self-centred way to live,” I said.</p>
<p>&ldquo;“Perhaps, but I’m not just looking up at the sky and waiting for the fruit to drop. In my own way, I’m working hard. I’m working ten times harder than you are.”</p>
<p>&ldquo;“That’s probably true,” I said. “I look around me sometimes and I get sick to my stomach. Why the hell don’t these bastards do something? I wonder. They don’t do a fucking thing, and then they moan about it.”</p>
<p>&ldquo;Amazed at the harshness of his tone, I looked at Nagasawa. “The way I see it, people are working hard. They’re working their fingers to the bone. Or am I looking at things wrong?”</p>
<p>&ldquo;“That’s not hard work. It’s just manual labour,” Nagasawa said with finality. “The ‘hard work’ I’m talking about is more self-directed and purposeful.”</p>
<p>&ldquo;“You mean, like studying Spanish while everyone else is taking it easy?”</p>
<p>&ldquo;“That’s it. I’m going to have Spanish mastered by next spring. I’ve got English and German and French down pat, and I’m almost there with Italian. You think things like that happen without hard work?”&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 266</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;I sat at my desk to write my Sunday morning letter to Naoko, drinking coffee from a big cup and listening to old Miles Davis albums. A fine rain was falling outside, while my room had the chill of an aquarium. The smell of mothballs lingered in the thick jumper I had just taken out of a storage box. High up on the window-pane clung a huge, fat fly, unmoving.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 285</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;It seemed incredible to me that a guy like that would want a girlfriend like Midori, but I kept this thought to myself.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 293</div></div><p>It&rsquo;s about control. If she&rsquo;s already a good girl, you can&rsquo;t be sure she&rsquo;s following orders. If she has to change a lot, then you know she&rsquo;s doing it because you ordered her to.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;“Hey, why don’t we go now and see a dirty film?” Midori suggested. “A really filthy S&amp;M one.”</p>
<p>&ldquo;We went from the bar to an eel shop, and from there to one of Shinjuku’s most run-down adult cinemas to see a triple bill. It was the only place we could find in the paper that was showing S&amp;M stuff. Inside, the cinema had some kind of indefinable smell. Our timing was good: the S&amp;M film was just starting as we took our seats. It was the story of a secretary and her schoolgirl sister being kidnapped by a bunch of men and subjected to sadistic tortures. The men made the older one to do all kinds of awful things by threatening to rape the sister, but soon the older sister is transformed into a raging masochist, and the younger one gets really turned on from having to watch all the contortions they put her through. It was such a gloomy, repetitive film, I got bored after a while.&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 294</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Midori’s eyes were glued to the screen. I was impressed: anyone watching a film with such fierce intensity was getting more than her money’s worth. She kept reporting her thoughts to me: “Oh my God, will you look at that!” or “Three guys at once! They’re going to tear her apart!” or “I’d like to try that on somebody, Watanabe.” I was enjoying Midori a lot more than the film.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 295</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;“Tell me, Watanabe, do you get hard watching this kind of stuff?”</p>
<p>&ldquo;“Well, yeah, sometimes,” I said. “That’s why they make these films.”</p>
<p>&ldquo;“So what you’re saying is, every time one of those scenes starts, every man in the cinema has his thing standing to attention? Thirty or forty of them sticking up all at once? It’s so weird if you stop and think about it, don’t you think?”&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 295</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;“Tell me, Watanabe, do you get hard watching this kind of stuff?”</p>
<p>&ldquo;“Well, yeah, sometimes,” I said. “That’s why they make these films.”</p>
<p>&ldquo;“So what you’re saying is, every time one of those scenes starts, every man in the cinema has his thing standing to attention? Thirty or forty of them sticking up all at once? It’s so weird if you stop and think about it, don’t you think?”</p>
<p>&ldquo;“Yeah, I guess so, now you mention it.”&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 295</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;“That was fun,” said Midori. “Let’s try it again sometime.” </p>
<p>&ldquo;“They just keep doing the same things,” I said. </p>
<p>&ldquo;“Well, what else can they do? We all just keep doing the same things.”</p>
<p>&ldquo;She had a point there.&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 296</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;if I go to bed with a girl, I’m going to want to do it with her, and the last thing I want is to lie there struggling to restrain myself. I’m not kidding, I might end up forcing you.”</p>
<p>&ldquo;“You mean you’d hit me and tie me up and rape me from behind?”</p>
<p>&ldquo;“Hey, look, I’m serious.”</p>
<p>&ldquo;“But I’m so lonely! I want to be with someone! I know I’m doing terrible things to you, making demands and not giving you anything in return, saying whatever pops into my head, dragging you out of your room and forcing you to take me everywhere, but you’re the only one I can do stuff like that to! I’ve never been able to have my own way with anybody, not once in the 20 years I’ve been alive. My father, my mother, they never paid the slightest attention to me, and my boyfriend, well, he’s just not that kind of guy. He gets angry if I try to have my own way. So we end up fighting. You’re the only one I can say these things to. And now I’m really, really, really tired and I want to fall asleep listening to someone tell me how much they like me and how pretty I am and stuff.&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 298</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;“Anyway, now that I’m feeling better, I’m starved! Let’s go for a pizza.”</p>
<p>&ldquo;I took her to a pizzeria I knew and ordered draught beer and an anchovy pizza. I wasn’t very hungry and ate only four of the twelve slices. Midori finished the rest. </p>
<p>&ldquo;“You sure made a fast recovery,” I said. “Not too long ago you were pale and wobbly.”</p>
<p>&ldquo;“It’s because my selfish demands got through to somebody,” she answered. “It unclogged me. Wow, this pizza is great!”&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 299</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Upstairs, she sat me at the kitchen table and went to warm the bath water. While she busied herself with that, I put a kettle on to boil and made tea. Waiting for the tank to heat up, we sat across from each other at the kitchen table and drank tea. Chin in hand, she took a long, hard look at me. There were no sounds other than the ticking of the clock and the hum of the fridge motor turning on and off as the thermostat kicked in and out. The clock showed that midnight was fast approaching.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 301</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;I nudged the curtain aside and looked down at the deserted shops. Every shop was closed, their metal shutters down, the vending machines hunched in front of the off-licence the only sign of something waiting for the dawn. The moan of long-distance lorry tyres sent a deep shudder through the air every now and then. I went back to the kitchen, poured myself another shot of brandy, and went on reading <em>Beneath the Wheel</em>. By the time I had finished it the sky was growing light.</p>
<p>&ldquo;I made myself some instant coffee and used some notepaper and a ballpoint pen I found on the table to write a message to Midori:</p>
<p>&ldquo;I drank some of your brandy. I bought a copy of <em>Beneath the Wheel</em>. It’s light outside, so I’m going home. Goodbye. Then, after some hesitation, I wrote: You look really cute when you’re sleeping.</p>
<p>&ldquo;I washed my coffee cup, switched off the kitchen light, went downstairs, quietly lifted the shutter, and stepped outside.&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 306</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;I glanced up at the pale pink curtains in Midori’s window, walked to the tram stop, rode to the end of the line, and walked to my dorm. On the way I found an open café and ate a breakfast of rice and miso soup, pickled vegetables and fried eggs.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 306</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Speaking of Midori, she sounds like an interesting person. Reading your letter, I got the feeling she might be in love with you. When I told that to Reiko, she said, ‘Well, of course she is! Even I am in love with Watanabe!’&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 308</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;I turned 20, autumn gave way to winter, but in my life nothing changed in any significant way. Unexcited, I went to my lectures, worked three nights a week in the record shop, reread <em>The Great Gatsby</em> now and then, and when Sunday came I would do my washing and write a long letter to Naoko. Sometimes I would go out with Midori for a meal or to the zoo or to the cinema.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 310</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Which is why I myself agree that the best thing for Naoko would be for her to receive therapy at a proper institution for a while. I hate to say it, but it’s all we can do. As I told you once before, patience is the most important thing. We have to go on unravelling the jumbled threads one at a time, without losing hope. No matter how hopeless her condition may appear to be, we are bound to find that one loose thread sooner or later. If you’re in pitch blackness, all you can do is sit tight until your eyes get used to the dark.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 340</div></div>      </div>
      </div>
        <div class="footer">
    <div class="footer-data"><div class="footer-links"><ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/contact.php" title="">Contact</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/support.php" title="">Support</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/privacy.php" title="">Privacy</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/rights.php" title="">Rights</a></li></ul></div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="copyright">Copyright (c) 1999-2026 earthli.com. All Rights Reserved.</div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="versions">Powered by <ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore/app_news.php">earthli News 3.7</a></li><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore" title="">earthli WebCore&trade; 3.7</a></li></ul></div></div>    </div>
      </div>
  </div>  </body>
</html>
]]>
  </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
      <title type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[Hard-Boiled Wonderland and the End of the World by Haruki Murakami (1985 jp; 1991 en) (read in 2023)]]>
  </title>
    <id>https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=4688</id>
    <link href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=4688"/>
    <updated>2025-12-26T17:47:57+01:00</updated>
    <author>
        <name type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[Marco von Ballmoos]]>
  </name>
      <uri>https://earthli.com/users/marco</uri>
    </author>
      <summary type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<p><small class="notes">Standard disclaimer [1]</small></p>
<p><span style="width: 132px; display: table" class=" align-right"><span class="auto-content-inline"><a href="https://www.earthli.com/data/news/attachments/entry/4688/hard-boiled_wonderland_and_the_end_of_the_world_cover_art.webp"><img src="https://www.earthli.com/data/news/attachments/entry/4688/hard-boiled_wonderland_and_the_end_of_the_world_cover_art_tn.webp" alt=" " style="width: 132px"></a></span><span class="auto-content-caption"><a href="https://www.earthli.com/data/news/attachments/entry/4688/hard-boiled_wonderland_and_the_end_of_the_world_cover_art.webp">Cover Art</a></span></span>This was my first book by Murakami. I very much like the writing style that bleeds through the translation from the Japanese. The world, though Japanese, feels comfortable and familiar to me. It would, of course. Though it is set on the other side of the world geographically,... [<a class="complete-text-link" href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=4688">More</a>]</p>
]]>
  </summary>
      <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<html lang="en">
  <head>
    <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/themes/ice.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/fonts/raleway.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/core/medium.css">
  </head>
  <body>
<div class="style-controls">  <div class="page">
    <div class="page-body">
<div class="info-box-top">
<p>
Published by <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_user.php?name=marco" title="Marco von Ballmoos" class="visible">marco</a> on <span class="date-time">26. Dec 2025 17:47:57 (GMT-5)</span>
</p>
</div>
      <div class="text-flow wide">
  <p><small class="notes">Standard disclaimer [1]</small></p>
<p><span style="width: 132px; display: table" class=" align-right"><span class="auto-content-inline"><a href="https://www.earthli.com/data/news/attachments/entry/4688/hard-boiled_wonderland_and_the_end_of_the_world_cover_art.webp"><img src="https://www.earthli.com/data/news/attachments/entry/4688/hard-boiled_wonderland_and_the_end_of_the_world_cover_art_tn.webp" alt=" " style="width: 132px"></a></span><span class="auto-content-caption"><a href="https://www.earthli.com/data/news/attachments/entry/4688/hard-boiled_wonderland_and_the_end_of_the_world_cover_art.webp">Cover Art</a></span></span>This was my first book by Murakami. I very much like the writing style that bleeds through the translation from the Japanese. The world, though Japanese, feels comfortable and familiar to me. It would, of course. Though it is set on the other side of the world geographically, in an ostensibly completely alien culture, it is temporally congruent with my upbringing, with my so-called formative years. Having been raised in the U.S. in the 80s, and Murakami seeming to be an unabashed fan of that culture, there are a lot of cultural touchstones in this book with which I can orient myself, by which I can feel comforted.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Libraries have certainly come a long way. The days of card pockets inside the backsleeves of books seemed like a faded dream. As a kid, I used to love all those withdrawal date stamps.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 74</div></div><p>And then there&rsquo;s the plot of the book: it&rsquo;s yet another appealing touchstone for me. It&rsquo;s a convoluted plot of secret cabals, secret organizations, and mind control. It harks back to all of the books I read by PKD, Borges, Pynchon, or Lem. Murakami doesn&rsquo;t even attempt to go anywhere near hard science-fiction. Instead, he plays with ideas, enjoying them without explaining how they would work.</p>
<p>It&rsquo;s not that I don&rsquo;t enjoy hard science-fiction—quite the contrary. It&rsquo;s just that it&rsquo;s also so much fun and so liberating the way he does it, without any sense of guilt about how fantastical some of this stuff is, just enjoying the ideas and letting them take us where they naturally lead. He&rsquo;s much more interested in the psychological, sociological, philosophical, and <em>human</em> implications.</p>
<p>And, finally, there is the <em>mood</em> of the book, and the cool lassitude of the hero of the novel. The book is just so relaxing to read. It&rsquo;s odd to say that there&rsquo;s no tension because that would make you think that it&rsquo;s boring. It is absolutely not boring. You simply feel Murakami&rsquo;s strong hand at the tiller the whole time, and you are secure in the knowledge that he will take you somewhere interesting, somewhere fun. I can&rsquo;t express it any other way than &ldquo;comforting&rdquo; [2]. I&rsquo;ve tried to capture this feeling with some of the citations below, but I don&rsquo;t know how well I&rsquo;ve succeeded.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;[…] felt like I was going to fade out any second, but I had to allow myself this luxury. A ritual interlude I like so much between the time I get into bed and the time I fall asleep. Having a drink in bed while listening to music and reading a book. As precious to me as a beautiful sunset or good clean air.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 67</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The River murmurs at my feet. There is the sandbar midstream, and on it the willows sway as they trail their long branches in the current. The water is beautifully clear. I can see fish playing among the rocks. Gazing at the River soothes me. Steps lead down from the bridge to the sandbar. A bench waits under the willows, a few beasts lay nearby. Often have I descended to the sandbar and offered crusts of bread to the beasts. At first they hesitated, but now the old and the very young eat from my hand. As the autumn deepens, the fathomless lakes of their eyes assume an ever more sorrowful hue. The leaves turn color, the grasses wither; the beasts sense the advance of a long, hungry season. And bowing to their vision, I too know a sadness.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 109</div></div><p>Despite the myriad western references, there are so many reminders that we are reading a Japanese novel,</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The hulk didn’t bother removing his shoes before trudging into the kitchen and swinging around to pull out the chair opposite me.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 132</div></div><p>Knocking down the door to break into the apartment didn&rsquo;t annoy our hero nearly as much as him walking in <em>with shoes on</em>: that was beyond the pale.</p>
<p>So what is the plot of the book? I&rsquo;m going to grab from the <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hard-Boiled_Wonderland_and_the_End_of_the_World">Wikipedia article</a>:</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;The narrator is a &ldquo;Calcutec&rdquo; (計算士, keisanshi), a human data processor and encryption system who has been trained to use his subconscious as an encryption key. The Calcutecs work for the quasi-governmental System, as opposed to the criminal &ldquo;Semiotecs&rdquo; (記号士, kigōshi) who work for the Factory and who are generally fallen Calcutecs. The relationship between the two groups is simple: the System protects data while the Semiotecs steal it, although it is suggested that one man might be behind both. The narrator completes an assignment for a mysterious scientist, who is exploring &ldquo;sound removal&rdquo;. He works in a laboratory hidden within an anachronistic version of Tokyo&rsquo;s sewer system. The narrator eventually learns that he only has a day and a half before his consciousness leaves the world he knows and delves forever into the world that has been created in his subconscious mind. According to the scientist, to the outside world this change will seem instantaneous, but in the Calcutec&rsquo;s mind, his time within this world will seem almost infinite.</p>
<p>&ldquo;[…]</p>
<p>&ldquo;The two storylines converge, exploring concepts of consciousness, the subconscious or unconscious mind, and identity&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote><p>Does that help? Does that help at all? The description above is exactly what the book is about but it&rsquo;s about so much more. You can imagine that the plot outlined above is only a scaffolding on which Murakami weaves discussions of what it means to be a person, what do you mean when you say &ldquo;me&rdquo;?</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;“You are fevered,” she says. “Where on the earth have you gone?”</p>
<p>&ldquo;I find it impossible to answer. I am without words. I cannot even comprehend what it is she asks. She brings several blankets and wraps me in them. I lie by the stove. Her hair touches my cheek. I do not want her to go away. I cannot tell if the thought is mine or if it has floated loose from some fragment of memory. I have lost so many things. I am so tired. I feel myself drifting, away, a little by little. I am overcome by the sensation that I am crumbling, parts of my being drifting away. Which part of me is thinking this?&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 151</div></div><p>As noted above (and in more detail in the full Wikipedia entry), our fearless narrator is split in two, with one self encrypted away in his subconscious. [3] The narrator begins to rebel against this thing that has been done to him. Though some form of himself probably entered the trade willingly, it is legitimate to ask whether the selves that exist today can be said to be in any way responsible for what he has become. He suffers from the loss—from the <em>split</em>—and he rebels against it, against the imminent demise of any of his selves, and against the rules imposed by those who continue to benefit from it.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Until this moment the memory, it seemed, had been sealed off from the sludge of my consciousness by an intervening force. An intervening force? Or an operation, like the one done on my brain to give me shuffling faculty. They had shoved memories out of my conscious awareness. They had stolen my memories from me! Nobody had that right. Nobody! My memories belonged to me. Stealing memories was stealing time. I got so mad, I lost all fear. I didn’t care what happened. I want to live! I told myself. I will live. I will get out of this insane netherworld and get my stolen memories back and live. Forget the end of the world, I was ready to reclaim my whole self.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 239</div></div><p>We learn more about the condition of Calcutecs like the narrator, who have something living within themselves, within their minds, that is out of their control, to which they have only limited access. Is there an analog to how we all are, how we all function, how we all shuffle through a deck of selves to display the one most appropriate to a given situation? We are all actors.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;“Well, there’s your cognitive system for y’. You just can’t say all at once. Accordin’ t’what you’re up against, almost instantaneously, you elect some point between the extremes. That’s the precision programming you’ve got built in. You yourself don’t know a thing about the inner shenanigans of that program. ’Tisn’t any need for you t’know. Even without you knowin’, you function as yourself. That’s your black box. In other words, we all carry around this great unexplored ‘elephant graveyard’ inside us.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 256</div></div><p>Not unexpectedly, the discussion with the old man / scientist turns to the notion of free will. In the ensuing decades since publication of this book, the waters of free will have been even further muddied [4] but, even back in the 80s, we weren&rsquo;t quite sure who was in the driver&rsquo;s seat. To what degree can a person embedded in a complex society such as ours, be said to be truly free? There are always choices, but the negative consequences of some choices constrain most people to a much narrower path than proponents of free will are selling. Are you free not to work? Are you free not to eat?</p>
<p>Now, compound these questions by having multiple selves sharing a brain, a mind, a consciousness.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;“Pursue this much further and we enter into theological issues. The bottom line here, if you want t’call it that, is whether human actions are plotted out in advance by the Divine, or self-initiated beginnin’ to end. Of course, ever since the modern age, science has stressed the physiological spontaneity of the human organism. But soon’s we start askin’ just what this spontaneity is, nobody can come up with a decent answer.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 257</div></div><p>As noted in the Wikipedia summary, towards the end of the story, one of the selves will be &ldquo;killed off&rdquo; but the sensation of it for the victim will be a diminishing of consciousness along the line of <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zeno%27s_paradoxes#Arrow_paradox">Zeno&rsquo;s Paradox</a> (<cite><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/">Wikipedia</a></cite>).</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Your body dies, your consciousness passes away, but your thought is caught in the one tautological point an instant before, subdividin’ for an eternity. Think about the koan: An arrow is stopped in flight. Well, the death of the body is the flight of the arrow. It’s makin’ a straight line for the brain. No dodgin’ it, not for anyone. People have t’die, the body has t’fall. Time is hurlin’ that arrow forward. And yet, like I was sayin’, thought goes on subdividin’ that time for ever and ever. The paradox becomes real. The arrow never hits.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 285</div></div><p>I&rsquo;ll end with the following choice citations—there are many more below—to remind me of what it felt like to read this book. I would definitely read it again, were I to become the kind of person who rereads books.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Even if I had my life to live over again, I couldn’t imagine not doing things the same. After all, everything—this life I was losing—was me. And I couldn’t be any other self but my self. Could I?&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 341</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;[…] like a boat with a twisted rudder, I kept coming back to the same place. I wasn’t going anywhere. I was myself, waiting on the shore for me to return. Was that so depressing? Who knows? Maybe that was “despair.” What Turgenev called “disillusionment.” Or Dostoyevsky, “hell.” Or Somerset Maugham, “reality.” Whatever the label, I figured it was me.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 341</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Pat Boone sang softly, I’ll Be Home. Time seemed to flow in the wrong direction, which was fine by me. Time could go whichever way it pleased.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 363</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The sun sliced through the windshield, sealing me in light. I closed my eyes and felt the warmth on my eyelids. Sunlight traveled a long distance to reach this planet; an infinitesimal portion of that energy was enough to warm my eyelids. I was moved. That something as insignificant as an eyelid had its place in the workings of the universe, that the cosmic order did not overlook this momentary fact. Was I any closer to appreciating Alyosha’s insights? Some limited happiness had been granted this limited life.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 395</div></div><p><br>
<hr></p>
<div class="footnote-reference"><span id="footnote_DRAFTABLE_ENTRY_4688_1_body" class="footnote-number">[1]</span> Disclaimer: these are notes I took while reading this book. They include citations I found interesting or enlightening or particularly well-written. In some cases, I&rsquo;ve pointed out which of these applies to which citation; in others, I have not. Any benefit you gain from reading these notes is purely incidental to the purpose they serve of reminding me of what I once read. Please see Wikipedia for a summary if I&rsquo;ve failed to provide one sufficient for your purposes. If my notes serve to trigger an interest in this book, then I&rsquo;m happy for you.</div><div class="footnote-reference"><span id="footnote_DRAFTABLE_ENTRY_4688_2_body" class="footnote-number">[2]</span> I am reading <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=5724">Norwegian Wood</a> right now, and I get the same exact feeling from that book and its main character.</div><div class="footnote-reference"><span id="footnote_DRAFTABLE_ENTRY_4688_3_body" class="footnote-number">[3]</span>  I would find it hard to believe that the writers of the TV show <em>Severance</em> are wholly unaware of this book.</div><div class="footnote-reference"><span id="footnote_DRAFTABLE_ENTRY_4688_4_body" class="footnote-number">[4]</span> See, e.g., <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Benjamin_Libet#Implications_of_Libet&#039;s_experiments">Implications of Libet&rsquo;s experiments</a> by <cite>Benjamin Libet</cite> (<cite><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/">Wikipedia</a></cite>).</div><h2>Citations</h2><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;[…] picturing the planet earth, for convenience sake, as a gigantic coffee table does in fact help clear away the clutter—those practically pointless contingencies such as gravity and the international dateline and the equator, those nagging details that arise from the spherical view. I mean, for a guy leading a perfectly ordinary existence, how many times in the course of a lifetime would the equator be a significant factor?&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 4</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;What the hell could the Brass be thinking? You dig a hole and the next thing they say is fill it in; fill it in and they tell you to dig a hole. They’re always screwing with the guy in the field.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 31</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;“To tell the truth, I do not know this thing called ‘mind,’ what it does or how to use it. It is only a word I have heard.”</p>
<p>&ldquo;“The mind is nothing you use,” I say. “The mind is just there. It is like the wind. You simply feel its movements.”&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 61</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;No doubt the Canals once conducted a brisk traffic of barges and launches, where now-stopped sluices expose dry channel beds, mud shriveling like the skin of a prehistoric organism. Weeds have rooted in cracks of the loading docks, broad stone steps descending to where the waterline once was. Old bottles and rusted machine parts poke up through the mire; a flat-bottom boat slowly rots nearby.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 65</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;[…] felt like I was going to fade out any second, but I had to allow myself this luxury. A ritual interlude I like so much between the time I get into bed and the time I fall asleep. Having a drink in bed while listening to music and reading a book. As precious to me as a beautiful sunset or good clean air.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 67</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Libraries have certainly come a long way. The days of card pockets inside the backsleeves of books seemed like a faded dream. As a kid, I used to love all those withdrawal date stamps.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 74</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;I study the chessboard and concede defeat. “You can gain yourself five moves,” says the Colonel. “Worth fighting to the end. In five moves your opponent can err. No war is won or lost until the final battle is over.” </p>
<p>&ldquo;“Then give me a moment,” I say.&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 85</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The River murmurs at my feet. There is the sandbar midstream, and on it the willows sway as they trail their long branches in the current. The water is beautifully clear. I can see fish playing among the rocks. Gazing at the River soothes me. Steps lead down from the bridge to the sandbar. A bench waits under the willows, a few beasts lay nearby. Often have I descended to the sandbar and offered crusts of bread to the beasts. At first they hesitated, but now the old and the very young eat from my hand. As the autumn deepens, the fathomless lakes of their eyes assume an ever more sorrowful hue. The leaves turn color, the grasses wither; the beasts sense the advance of a long, hungry season. And bowing to their vision, I too know a sadness.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 109</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;“There is no beyond,” she says. “Did you not know? We are at the End of the World. We are here forever.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 123</div></div><p>Oh. This is the self he has closed off, the one that does the shuffling. Now I know where <em>Severance</em> came from.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Now for a good twelve-hour sleep, I told myself. Twelve solid hours. Let birds sing, let people go to work. Somewhere out there, a volcano might blow, Israeli commandos might decimate a Palestinian village. I couldn’t stop it. I was going to sleep.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 126</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The hulk didn’t bother removing his shoes before trudging into the kitchen and swinging around to pull out the chair opposite me.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 132</div></div><p>Knocking down the door: Ok; coming in with shoes on: beyond the pale.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Junior didn’t say a word, choosing instead to contemplate the lit end of his cigarette. This was where the Jean-Luc Godard scene would have been titled <em>Il regardait le feu de son tabac</em>. My luck that Godard films were no longer fashionable. When the tip of Junior’s cigarette had transformed into a goodly increment of ash, he gave it a measured tap, and the ash fell on the table. For him, an ashtray was extraneous.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 132</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;“You are fevered,” she says. “Where on the earth have you gone?”</p>
<p>&ldquo;I find it impossible to answer. I am without words. I cannot even comprehend what it is she asks. She brings several blankets and wraps me in them. I lie by the stove. Her hair touches my cheek. I do not want her to go away. I cannot tell if the thought is mine or if it has floated loose from some fragment of memory. I have lost so many things. I am so tired. I feel myself drifting, away, a little by little. I am overcome by the sensation that I am crumbling, parts of my being drifting away. Which part of me is thinking this?&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 151</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;[…] remove the inner sole of one, conceal the map, and replace the sole. I approach the Colonel again. “The Gatekeeper is not someone I can trust. Will you see that my shadow receives these?”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 171</div></div><p>They become aware of one another. Their patterns matching up. Both are hiding something from the System/Town/Wall. Now, they begin to communicate.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;I gently place both hands upon the skull and stare, waiting for a warm glow to emanate. When it reaches a certain temperature—like a patch of sun in winter—the white-polished skull offers up its old dreams. I strain my eyes and breathe deeply, using my fingertips to trace the intricate lines of the tale it commences to tell. The voice of the light remains ever so faint; images quiet as ancient constellations float across the dome of my dawning mind. They are indistinct fragments that never merge into a sensate picture. There would be a landscape I have not seen before, unfamiliar melodic echoes, whisperings in a chaos of tongues. They drift up fitfully and as suddenly sink into darkness. Between one fragment and the next there is nothing in common. I experiment with ways to concentrate my energies into my fingertips, but the outcome never varies. For while I recognize that the old dreams relate to something in me, I am lost.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 183</div></div><p>The chapters are getting shorter. They are getting closer, the two halves.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;“Everyone must have one thing that they can excel at. It’s just a matter of drawing it out, isn’t it? But school doesn’t know how to draw it out. It crushes the gift. It’s no wonder most people never get to be what they want to be. They just get ground down.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 192</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;I kept thinking about that young couple in the Skyline, Duran Duran on stereo. Oblivious to everything. I wished I could have been a little more oblivious. I put myself in the driver’s seat, woman sitting next to me, cruising the late night streets to an innocuous pop beat. Did the woman take off her bracelets during sex? Nice if she didn’t. Even if she was naked, those two bracelets needed to be there.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 204</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;The aged Devil sat on a rock by the side of a Finnish country road. The Devil was ten thousand, maybe twenty thousand years old, and very tired. He was covered in dust. His whiskers were wilting.</p>
<p>&ldquo;Whither be ye gang in sich ’aste? the Devil called out to a Farmer.</p>
<p>&ldquo;Done broke me ploughshare and must to fixe it, the Farmer replied.</p>
<p>&ldquo;Not to hurrie, said the Devil, the sunne still play es o’erhead on highe, wherefore be ye scurrying? Sit ye doun and ‘eare m’ tale. The Farmer knew no good could come of passing time with the Devil, but seeing him so utterly haggard, the Farmer […]&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 217</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Until this moment the memory, it seemed, had been sealed off from the sludge of my consciousness by an intervening force. An intervening force? Or an operation, like the one done on my brain to give me shuffling faculty. They had shoved memories out of my conscious awareness. They had stolen my memories from me! Nobody had that right. Nobody! My memories belonged to me. Stealing memories was stealing time. I got so mad, I lost all fear. I didn’t care what happened. I want to live! I told myself. I will live. I will get out of this insane netherworld and get my stolen memories back and live. Forget the end of the world, I was ready to reclaim my whole self.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 239</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;You know the old saying: When the sun leaks through again, patch the roof for rain.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 253</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;“Well, there’s your cognitive system for y’. You just can’t say all at once. Accordin’ t’what you’re up against, almost instantaneously, you elect some point between the extremes. That’s the precision programming you’ve got built in. You yourself don’t know a thing about the inner shenanigans of that program. ’Tisn’t any need for you t’know. Even without you knowin’, you function as yourself. That’s your black box. In other words, we all carry around this great unexplored ‘elephant graveyard’ inside us.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 256</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;“Pursue this much further and we enter into theological issues. The bottom line here, if you want t’call it that, is whether human actions are plotted out in advance by the Divine, or self-initiated beginnin’ to end. Of course, ever since the modern age, science has stressed the physiological spontaneity of the human organism. But soon’s we start askin’ just what this spontaneity is, nobody can come up with a decent answer.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 257</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;“The best musicians transpose consciousness into sound; painters do the same for color and shape. Mental phenomena are the stuff writers make into novels. It’s the same basic logic. Of course, as encephalodigital conversion, it doesn’t represent an accurate mappin’, but viewin’ an accurate, random succession of images didn’t much help us either. Anyway, this ‘visual edition’ proved quite convenient for graspin’ the whole picture.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 262</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;“You take your information, your encyclopedia text, and you transpose it into numerics. You assign everything a two-digit number, periods and commas included. 00 is a blank, A is 01, B is 02, and so on. Then after you’ve lined them all up, you put a decimal point before the whole lot. So now you’ve got a very long sub-decimal fraction. 0.173000631 … Next, you engrave a mark at exactly that point along the toothpick.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 284</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Your body dies, your consciousness passes away, but your thought is caught in the one tautological point an instant before, subdividin’ for an eternity. Think about the koan: An arrow is stopped in flight. Well, the death of the body is the flight of the arrow. It’s makin’ a straight line for the brain. No dodgin’ it, not for anyone. People have t’die, the body has t’fall. Time is hurlin’ that arrow forward. And yet, like I was sayin’, thought goes on subdividin’ that time for ever and ever. The paradox becomes real. The arrow never hits.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 285</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;“It’s something that struck me only recently. I was just seein’ where my research would take me and I ran smack into this one. That expandin’ human time doesn’t make you immortal; it’s subdividin’ time that does the trick.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 285</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;“Still, it’s nothing t’fear,” the Professor philosophized. “It’s not death. It’s eternal life. And you get t’be yourself. Compared to that, this world isn’t but a momentary fantasy. Please don’t forget that.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 290</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Everything wheeled around closer and farther, closer and farther, like a merry-go-round. When was it those two had come and done their dirty work on my belly? It had to have been before I was sitting at the supermarket snack bar—or no? When had I last pissed? Why did I care?&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 307</div></div><p>Because you&rsquo;re trying to figure out if this the real world. Stanislaw Lem. Borges. Dick.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;“Your shadow is on the verge of death. A person has the right to see his own shadow under these circumstances. There are rules about this. The Town observes the passing of a shadow as a solemn event, and the Gatekeeper does not interfere. There is no reason for him to interfere.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 318</div></div><p>Ah, that&rsquo;s what the shadow is. It&rsquo;s the counterpart in the other world.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;As if I really believed that. It’d been fifteen years since Jim Morrison died, and never once had I come across a Doors taxi. There are things that change in this world and things that don’t. Department stores haven’t stopped piping in Raimond Lefebvre Orchestra Muzak, beer halls still play to polkas, shopping arcades play Ventures’ Christmas carols from mid-November.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 324</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;I took a seat to wait my turn, Lufthansa bag on my knee. It looked like I was next in line. Great. A guy can only watch somebody else’s clothes revolve for so long. Especially on his last day. I sprawled out in the chair and gazed off into space. The laundromat had that particular detergent and clothes-drying smell. Contrary to my expectations, none of the driers opened up. There are unwritten rules about laundromats and “The watched drier never stops” is one of them. From where I sat, the clothes looked perfectly dry, but the drums didn’t know when to quit.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 337</div></div><p>A time of no phones and a much higher tolerance of being alone with one&rsquo;s thoughts.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Even if I had my life to live over again, I couldn’t imagine not doing things the same. After all, everything—this life I was losing—was me. And I couldn’t be any other self but my self. Could I?&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 341</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;[…] like a boat with a twisted rudder, I kept coming back to the same place. I wasn’t going anywhere. I was myself, waiting on the shore for me to return. Was that so depressing? Who knows? Maybe that was “despair.” What Turgenev called “disillusionment.” Or Dostoyevsky, “hell.” Or Somerset Maugham, “reality.” Whatever the label, I figured it was me.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 341</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;I leaned one elbow on the table and considered the clock. Watching the hands of a clock advance is a meaningless way to spend time, but I couldn’t think of anything better to do. Most human activities are predicated on the assumption that life goes on. If you take that premise away, what is there left?&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 343</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;“I remember Mother told me that if one has mind, nothing is ever lost, regardless where one goes. Is that true?”</p>
<p>&ldquo;“I don’t know,” I tell her. “But true or not, that is what your mother believed. The question is whether you believe it.”</p>
<p>&ldquo;“I think I can,” she says, gazing into my eyes.</p>
<p>&ldquo;“You can?” I ask, startled. “You think you can believe that?”</p>
<p>&ldquo;“Probably,” she says. “No. Think it over carefully. This is very important,” I say, “because to believe something, whatever it might be, is the doing of the mind. Do you follow? When you say you believe, you allow the possibility of disappointment. And from disappointment or betrayal, there may come despair. Such is the way of the mind. Do you know these things?”&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 350</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;“It is like looking for lost drops of rain in a river.”</p>
<p>&ldquo;“You’re wrong. The mind is not like raindrops. It does not fall from the skies, it does not lose itself among other things. If you believe in me at all, then believe this: I promise you I will find it. Everything depends on this.”</p>
<p>&ldquo;“I believe you,” she whispers after a moment. “Please find my mind.”&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 352</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The man immediately returned to his eggbeater disassembly. He had sorted screws of different sizes into clean white trays. They looked so happy.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 354</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;“Good butter sauce is an art,” I said. “It takes time. You stir finely minced shallots into melted butter, then heat it over a very low flame. No shortcuts.”</p>
<p>&ldquo;“Ah yes, you like to cook, don’t you?”</p>
<p>&ldquo;“Well, I used to. You need real dedication. Fresh ingredients, a discerning palate, an eye for presentation. It’s not a modern art. Good cooking has hardly evolved since the nineteenth century.”&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 361</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Pat Boone sang softly, I’ll Be Home. Time seemed to flow in the wrong direction, which was fine by me. Time could go whichever way it pleased.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 363</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The clothes on the floor, the music, the conversation. Round and round it goes, and where it stops everyone knows. Like a dead heat on the merry-go-round. No one pulls ahead, no one gets left behind. You always get to the same spot.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 364</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;She poured wine into both our glasses.</p>
<p>&ldquo;“What time is it?” I asked.</p>
<p>&ldquo;“Nighttime,” she answered.&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 365</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;When have I last heard a song? My body has craved music. I have been so long without music, I have not even known my own hunger. The resonance permeates; the strain eases within me. Music brings a warm glow to my vision, thawing mind and muscle from their endless wintering.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 368</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The girl was amazing. She was half my age, and she could handle things ten times better than me. I set down the receiver with a tinge of sadness, knowing I’d never see her again. I was watching the chandeliers get carried out of a once-grand hotel, now bankrupt. One by one the windows are sealed, the curtains taken down.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 373</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;“I watched you coming back from the kitchen just now,” I said.</p>
<p>&ldquo;“Did I pass?”</p>
<p>&ldquo;“You’ve got great legs.”</p>
<p>&ldquo;“You like them?”</p>
<p>&ldquo;“A whole lot.”</p>
<p>&ldquo;She put her glass down on the table and kissed me below the ear. “Did I ever tell you?” she said. “I love compliments.”&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 375</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;FM station on low, Roger Williams playing Autumn Leaves, that time of year.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 376</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;I didn’t mean to be nosy, but everything seemed meaningful. Autumn in New York, by the Frank Chacksfield Orchestra,&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 376</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Woody Herman swinging into Early Autumn.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 376</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Duke Ellington would be right even for New Year’s Eve at an Antarctic base. I drove along, whistling to Lawrence Brown’s trombone solo on Do Nothin’ Till You Hear from Me, followed by Johnny Hodges on Sophisticated Lady.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 387</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The sun sliced through the windshield, sealing me in light. I closed my eyes and felt the warmth on my eyelids. Sunlight traveled a long distance to reach this planet; an infinitesimal portion of that energy was enough to warm my eyelids. I was moved. That something as insignificant as an eyelid had its place in the workings of the universe, that the cosmic order did not overlook this momentary fact. Was I any closer to appreciating Alyosha’s insights? Some limited happiness had been granted this limited life.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 395</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Bob Dylan was singing A Hard Rain’s A-Gonna Fall, over and over.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 396</div></div>      </div>
      </div>
        <div class="footer">
    <div class="footer-data"><div class="footer-links"><ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/contact.php" title="">Contact</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/support.php" title="">Support</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/privacy.php" title="">Privacy</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/rights.php" title="">Rights</a></li></ul></div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="copyright">Copyright (c) 1999-2026 earthli.com. All Rights Reserved.</div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="versions">Powered by <ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore/app_news.php">earthli News 3.7</a></li><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore" title="">earthli WebCore&trade; 3.7</a></li></ul></div></div>    </div>
      </div>
  </div>  </body>
</html>
]]>
  </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
      <title type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[The Left Hand of Darkness by Ursula K. Le Guin (1969) (read in 2025)]]>
  </title>
    <id>https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=5557</id>
    <link href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=5557"/>
    <updated>2025-09-07T13:04:29+02:00</updated>
    <author>
        <name type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[Marco von Ballmoos]]>
  </name>
      <uri>https://earthli.com/users/marco</uri>
    </author>
      <summary type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<p><small class="notes">Standard disclaimer [1]</small></p>
<p><span style="width: 130px; display: table" class=" align-right"><span class="auto-content-inline"><a href="https://www.earthli.com/data/news/attachments/entry/5557/left_hand_of_darkness_by_ursula_k._le_guin_book_cover.webp"><img src="https://www.earthli.com/data/news/attachments/entry/5557/left_hand_of_darkness_by_ursula_k._le_guin_book_cover_tn.webp" alt=" " style="width: 130px"></a></span><span class="auto-content-caption"><a href="https://www.earthli.com/data/news/attachments/entry/5557/left_hand_of_darkness_by_ursula_k._le_guin_book_cover.webp">Book Cover</a></span></span>You will often hear this book described as a feminist masterpiece. I honestly can&rsquo;t figure out why. It is about so much more than feminism, though it is also about that. I think it is a masterpiece, though. It is a wholly realized world, limned with light brushstrokes onto... [<a class="complete-text-link" href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=5557">More</a>]</p>
]]>
  </summary>
      <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<html lang="en">
  <head>
    <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/themes/ice.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/fonts/raleway.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/core/medium.css">
  </head>
  <body>
<div class="style-controls">  <div class="page">
    <div class="page-body">
<div class="info-box-top">
<p>
Published by <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_user.php?name=marco" title="Marco von Ballmoos" class="visible">marco</a> on <span class="date-time">7. Sep 2025 13:04:29 (GMT-5)</span>
</p>
<p>
Updated by <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_user.php?name=marco" title="Marco von Ballmoos" class="visible">marco</a> on <span class="date-time">7. Sep 2025 13:08:35 (GMT-5)</span>
</p>
</div>
      <div class="text-flow wide">
  <p><small class="notes">Standard disclaimer [1]</small></p>
<p><span style="width: 130px; display: table" class=" align-right"><span class="auto-content-inline"><a href="https://www.earthli.com/data/news/attachments/entry/5557/left_hand_of_darkness_by_ursula_k._le_guin_book_cover.webp"><img src="https://www.earthli.com/data/news/attachments/entry/5557/left_hand_of_darkness_by_ursula_k._le_guin_book_cover_tn.webp" alt=" " style="width: 130px"></a></span><span class="auto-content-caption"><a href="https://www.earthli.com/data/news/attachments/entry/5557/left_hand_of_darkness_by_ursula_k._le_guin_book_cover.webp">Book Cover</a></span></span>You will often hear this book described as a feminist masterpiece. I honestly can&rsquo;t figure out why. It is about so much more than feminism, though it is also about that. I think it is a masterpiece, though. It is a wholly realized world, limned with light brushstrokes onto which the reader hangs their own detail, unlike so many modern books where every last detail is included, to avoid the reader having to fill in anything themselves. Instead, Le Guin has a light hand, wielding an incredible skill that was perhaps enhanced by having had to write everything either longhand or on a typewriter. She is a masterful writer.</p>
<p>The foreword was very, very good, as was the 50th-anniversary introduction written by Le Guin herself, in which she distilled her original intent with the book in a way that is clearer than the book itself manages. Without these introductions, I might have missed the significance of <em>Kemmer</em>—the sexual expression of the people of the planet Gethen/Winter that occurs once every month, in which the body arbitrarily chooses a gender and goes into hormonal overdrive, seeking to mate—because there was so much more going on in the book.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Le Guin created her worlds with an anthropologist’s eye not only for language, but for rituals, myths, and influence of geography on culture. Gethen feels too replete with persuasive details to be made up. […] the true antagonists of The Left Hand of Darkness are very human bigotry, politicking and the harshness of the Gethenian climate. What action sequences there are occur offstage, or are handled with undramatic brevity. They serve as location shifters, not as adrenaline tweakers. Future tech plays a minimal role in Le Guin’s science fiction, and there is no exotic alien megafauna.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page xii</div></div><p>Instead of action or future tech, Le Guin focuses on helping you see what this world looks like. At the same time, an reasonably aware reader will be unable to avoid drawing comparisons to our world. For example, the following sequence is replete with new information but provides it in a way—enveloped in familiar scenes—that allows the reader to build a view of this alien world, to learn the terms, all without seeming pedantic or overly descriptive.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;It was not the answer Herbor had hoped, but it was the answer he got, and having a patient heart he went home to Charuthe with it, through the snows of Grende. He came into the Domain and into the strong-place and climbed the tower, and there found his kemmering Berosty sitting as ever blank and bleak by an ash-smothered fire, his arms lying on a table of red stone, his head sunk between his shoulders.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 47</div></div><p>You can see the characters, can&rsquo;t you? You have learned something about what things are called in this world, on this cold planet. Perhaps the word &ldquo;kemmering&rdquo; is the only one that you cannot discern from context. But perhaps, too, you might elicit the meaning &ldquo;mate&rdquo; or &ldquo;partner&rdquo;.</p>
<p>The next sequence is much longer but is completely representative of Le Guin&rsquo;s style in teaching us about this world, all without pedantry, all with information woven into tales about the world, told by characters in this world, each of which seems to be flowing naturally from the overarching story itself. She does not jar her readers with exposition.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;My landlady, a voluble man, arranged my journey into the East. “If a person wants to visit Fastnesses he’s got to cross the Kargav. Over the mountains, into Old Karhide, to Rer, the old King’s City. Now I’ll tell you, a hearthfellow of mine runs a landboat caravan over the Eskar Pass and yesterday he was telling me over a cup of orsh that they’re going to make their first trip this summer on Getheny Osme, it having been such a warm spring and the road already clear up to Engohar and the plows will have the pass clear in another couple of days. Now you won’t catch me crossing the Kargav, Erhenrang for me and a roof over my head. But I’m a Yomeshta, praise to the nine hundred Throne-Upholders and blest be the Milk of Meshe, and one can be a Yomeshta anywhere. We’re a lot of newcomers, see, for my Lord Meshe was born 2,202 years ago, but the Old Way of the Handdara goes back ten thousand years before that. You have to go back to the Old Land if you’re after the Old Way.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 49</div></div><p>And then she can elicit sympathy from humans on this planet, her readers, with lovely, incredibly expressive, <em>poetic</em> sentences like this one.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;It was all golden, all benign, that week of walking; and at night before I slept I would step out of the dark farmhouse or firelit Hearth-Hall where I was lodged and <strong>walk a way into the dry stubble to look up at the stars, flaring like far cities in the windy autumn dark.</strong>&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 115</div></div><p>Are you not standing in that field with Genry? Are you not flung back to a time when you also walked out, from a warm, glowing hearth, into the dark to discover infinitude spread before you, either in the forests or waters stretching to the horizon or in the stars above? Do you not feel the cold air, waking your senses, inviting euphoria and epiphany?</p>
<p>She dabbles in timeless aphorisms, like the one below, which any given era would argue applies more to itself than even the era in which it was written.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Legends of prediction are common throughout the whole Household of Man. God speaks, spirits speak, computers speak. <strong>Oracular ambiguity or statistical probability provides loopholes, and discrepancies are expunged by Faith.</strong>&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 58</div></div><p>She does this as well in examining—or having Genry examine—the implications of the kemmer/somer cycle, in which there is no lasting male or female expression, in which biological duality does not exist—so that it does not imprint itself on culture, it does not bend all other anthropological activity to its will.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;[…] The fact that everyone between seventeen and thirty-five or so is liable to be (as Nim put it) “tied down to childbearing,” implies that no one is quite so thoroughly “tied down” here as women, elsewhere, are likely to be—psychologically or physically. Burden and privilege are shared out pretty equally; <strong>everybody has the same risk to run or choice to make. Therefore nobody here is quite so free as a free male anywhere else.</strong>&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 100</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;There is no division of humanity into strong and weak halves, protective/protected, dominant/submissive, owner/chattel, active/passive. In fact <strong>the whole tendency to dualism that pervades human thinking may be found to be lessened, or changed, on Winter.</strong>&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 100</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;A man wants his virility regarded, a woman wants her femininity appreciated, however indirect and subtle the indications of regard and appreciation. On Winter they will not exist. <strong>One is respected and judged only as a human being. It is an appalling experience.</strong>&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 101</div></div><p>The story follows Genry Ai, a male Terran native on the planet Winter, an outlying planet that had been seeded with humans in a long and distant past. He is there to determine whether to extend an invitation to the planet into a federation called the Ekumen, a loose alliance of over 100 planets that work together toward common goals.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;We are all men, you know, sir. All of us. All the worlds of men were settled, eons ago, from one world, Hain. We vary, but we’re all sons of the same Hearth. . .&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 37</div></div><p>The Ekumen is very clearly more advanced than Winter in many ways. Winter does have some innovations that the Ekumen would find useful. They do not really know war—murder on an industrial scale. Disputes arise, of course, but they are nearly always settled without loss of life, or with very restricted loss of life. Some of the inhabitants of Winter have learned how to predict the future with an uncanny accuracy, although the precision of the answer depends on the acumen of the questioner.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;We have NAFAL ships and instantaneous transmission and mindspeech, but we haven’t yet tamed hunch to run in harness; for that trick we must go to Gethen.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 71</div></div><p>Genry&rsquo;s journey takes him from the nation of Karhide (hierarchical/autocratic), where he had worked with Estraven, to the nation of Orgoreyn (communal/autocratic). After Estraven falls from favor, Genry feels the pressure of the mad king of Karhide and more-or-less flees to Orgoreyn, where he at first feels safer and more capable of performing his mission than he had at the end of his time in Karhide. Soon, though, the subterfuge and treachery of most of the 33 members of the council (Commensal) lead to the beginning of trials and tribulations for Genry that push him not only to physical collapse but beyond.</p>
<p>He takes a truck with others, through the mountain passes, through the colds of winter, through privation (little to no food; little to no insulation). He is a prisoner amongst many other prisoners. They huddle for warmth at night; they share water. They let the very sick go.</p>
<p>He arrives to an even bleaker existence at a prison. It is here that his self is nearly obliterated, not only physically but mentally, spiritually. It is hard to ignore the circumstances of history, in which an American author of the 1960s—smack-dab in the middle of the so-called <em>Cold War</em>—writes of a brutal, inhuman prison in the depths of a cold, northern desert, where prisoners are kept for political crimes, where they are pumped for information that they don&rsquo;t have. It is hard not to hear the world &ldquo;gulag&rdquo; screamed from every sentence.</p>
<p>Estraven breaks Genry free from this prison by infiltrating it and using his &ldquo;Dothe&rdquo; strength (<span class="quote-inline">&ldquo;the voluntary summoning of the body’s full strength&rdquo;</span>), planning a spectacular journey across the 800 miles of glacial wastelands to the north of both countries. They travel in conditions of extreme hardship, growing incredibly close as friends, discussing many things that seem quite relevant to humanity as it is on Earth, discussing the senselessness of clans or nations fighting each other rather than working together for common goals.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;What does it matter which country wakens first, so long as we waken?&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 165</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;How does one hate a country, or love one? […] I know people, I know towns, farms, hills and rivers and rocks, I know how the sun at sunset in autumn falls on the side of a certain plowland in the hills; but <strong>what is the sense of giving a boundary to all that, of giving it a name and ceasing to love where the name ceases to apply?</strong>&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 176</div></div><p>They experience the euphoria of surviving a beautiful and uncaring nature that seems to seek to kill them at nearly every opportunity but, in reality, doesn&rsquo;t care either way whether they live or die.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;<strong>Estraven stood there in harness beside me looking at that magnificent and unspeakable desolation. “I’m glad I have lived to see this,” he said.</strong> I felt as he did. It is good to have an end to journey towards; but it is the journey that matters, in the end. It had not rained, here on these north-facing slopes. Snow-fields stretched down from the pass into the valleys of moraine. We stowed the wheels, uncapped the sledge-runners, put on our skis, and took off—down, north, onward, <strong>into that silent vastness of fire and ice that said in enormous letters of black and white DEATH, DEATH, written right across a continent. The sledge pulled like a feather, and we laughed with joy.</strong>&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 182</div></div><p>This occasional euphoria is matched, of course, with despair, such as that engendered by the arrival of the <em>unshadow</em>, described as follows,</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;All brightness was gone, leaving nothing. We stepped out of the tent onto nothing. Sledge and tent were there, Estraven stood beside me, but neither he nor I cast any shadow. There was dull light all around, everywhere. When we walked on the crisp snow no shadow showed the footprint. We left no track. Sledge, tent, himself, myself: nothing else at all. No sun, no sky, no horizon, no world. A whitish-gray void, in which we appeared to hang.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 219</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;No shadows. An even, white, soundless sphere: we moved along inside a huge frosted-glass ball. There was nothing inside the ball, and nothing was outside it.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 223</div></div><p>They are rescued from this nothingness by the appearance of <em>nunataks</em>, utterly unreassuring features of the landscape that nonetheless bring relief to those made desperate enough by the unshadow to seek it in even the most unsympathetic and otherwise foreboding features.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;[…] we saw them plainly before sunset: <strong>nunataks</strong>, great scored and ravaged pinnacles of rock jutting up out of the ice, no more of them showing than shows of an iceberg above the sea: <strong>cold drowned mountains, dead for eons.</strong>&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 220</div></div><p>Le Guin&rsquo;s poetic description should be the official definition of that word.</p>
<p>Estraven is truly a remarkable character, a solid good, a source of wisdom and skill, a source of resolve and kindness. Genry is also very good but I felt I had the most in common with Estraven. When they are forced to finally abandon the sledge that had accompanied them, supported them without complaint throughout their 750-mile journey, Estraven laments it.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;[…] He glanced back at the sledge, a bit of refuse in the vast torment of ice and reddish rock. “It did well,” he said. His loyalty extended without disproportion to things, the patient, obstinate, reliable things that we use and get used to, the things we live by. He missed the sledge.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 226</div></div><p>This section speaks to me so much, as I think to myself &ldquo;who wouldn&rsquo;t feel this way about a piece of equipment that had served them well?&rdquo; And then I think that most people have no attachment to things because they constantly look forward to new things that will replace them.</p>
<p>Genry and Estraven emerge from the frozen wastes into Karhide but they are, of course, not greeted with open arms. They fled from a country in which Estraven could move freely but in which Genry was imprisoned, to a country in which Genry has power but from which Estraven has been exiled. In the end, Estraven sacrifices himself to save Genry&rsquo;s mission of integrating Gethen/Winter into the Ekumen. The ending matters far less than the journey of the book, which is very appropriate.</p>
<p>Highly recommended; I would read it again.</p>
<p><hr></p>
<div class="footnote-reference"><span id="footnote_DRAFTABLE_ENTRY_5557_1_body" class="footnote-number">[1]</span> Disclaimer: these are notes I took while reading this book. They include citations I found interesting or enlightening or particularly well-written. In some cases, I&rsquo;ve pointed out which of these applies to which citation; in others, I have not. Any benefit you gain from reading these notes is purely incidental to the purpose they serve of reminding me of what I once read. Please see Wikipedia for a summary if I&rsquo;ve failed to provide one sufficient for your purposes. If my notes serve to trigger an interest in this book, then I&rsquo;m happy for you.</div><h2>Citations</h2><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Ursula le Guin is a creator of vivid worlds. Earthsea is one of the most fully realized worlds in fantasy, to my mind, and the Hainish Cycle, to which The Left Hand of Darkness belongs, is one of the most evocative series in science fiction. What Earthsea and the Hainish Cycle have in common is maximal impact with minimal page count. Both feel vast, as if <strong>the novels are only glimpses of worlds, not full delineations of them; as if worlds continue to follow their histories even when no reader is watching.</strong>&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page xii</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Le Guin <strong>created her worlds with an anthropologist’s eye not only for language, but for rituals, myths, and influence of geography on culture.</strong> Gethen feels too replete with persuasive details to be made up. Cliche withers away. Le Guin does not resort to evil masterminds or dystopian states needing to be overthrown by a plucky band of misfits. A mentally unstable king and a quasi-totalitarian state threaten Genly Ai’s safety, but <strong>the true antagonists of The Left Hand of Darkness are very human bigotry, politicking and the harshness of the Gethenian climate.</strong> What action sequences there are occur offstage, or are handled with undramatic brevity. They serve as location shifters, not as adrenaline tweakers. <strong>Future tech plays a minimal role in Le Guin’s science fiction, and there is no exotic alien megafauna.</strong>&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page xii</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;He is an unarmed man in his late twenties from a distant planet, a self-exile out of his political and cultural depth, at the mercy of events he rarely, or barely, grasps. For most of the novel he fails to notice that he’d be dead without Estraven’s discreet interventions. <strong>What heroism he possesses is about surviving failure and failing better.</strong>&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page xiii</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Le Guin’s writing—in The Left Hand of Darkness as powerfully as anywhere—also <strong>dares to posit how society could be better and fairer and wiser than the one we have.</strong> Le Guin’s fiction about others dreams seditious dreams for this one. It asserts that dysfunctions and injustices perpetrated by human beings can be amended and redeemed by those same human beings. It is a quiet, insistent call to arms by and for the better angels of our nature. <strong>Utopia may exist only in signposts to Utopia, but that’s enough; it’ll do; it’ll have to.</strong> Just as long as we have those signposts.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page xv</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;They may use all kinds of facts to support their tissue of lies. They may describe the Marshalsea Prison, which was a real place, or the battle of Borodino, which really was fought, or the process of cloning, which really takes place in laboratories, or the deterioration of a personality, which is described in real textbooks of psychology, and so on. <strong>This weight of verifiable place-event-phenomenon-behavior makes the reader forget that he is reading a pure invention, a history that never took place anywhere</strong> but in that unlocalizable region, the author’s mind. In fact, <strong>while we read a novel, we are insane—bonkers. We believe in the existence of people who aren’t there, we hear their voices</strong>, we watch the battle of Borodino with them, we may even become Napoleon. Sanity returns (in most cases) when the book is closed. <strong>Is it any wonder that no truly respectable society has ever trusted its artists?</strong>&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page xix</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;I am not predicting, or prescribing. I am describing. I am describing certain aspects of psychological reality in <strong>the novelist’s way, which is by inventing elaborately circumstantial lies.</strong>&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page xxii</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Prediction is the business of prophets, clairvoyants, and futurologists. It is not the business of novelists. <strong>A novelist’s business is lying.</strong>&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page xxii</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;<strong>In reading a novel, any novel, we have to know perfectly well that the whole thing is nonsense, and then, while reading, believe every word of it.</strong> Finally, when we’re done with it, we may find—if it’s a good novel—that we’re a bit different from what we were before we read it, that we have been changed a little, as if by having met a new face, crossed a street we never crossed before. But it’s very hard to say just what we learned, how we were changed. The artist deals with what cannot be said in words. The artist whose medium is fiction does this in words. <strong>The novelist says in words what cannot be said in words.</strong>&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page xxii</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;For two days he walked northward on the Ice. He had no food with him, nor shelter but his coat. On the Ice nothing grows and no beasts run. It was the month of Susmy and the first great snows were falling those days and nights. He went alone through the storm. On the second day he knew he was growing weaker. On the second night he must lie down and sleep awhile. On the third morning waking he saw that his hands were frostbitten, and found that his feet were too, though he could not unfasten his boots to look at them, having no use left of his hands. <strong>He began to crawl forward on knees and elbows. He had no reason to do so, as it did not matter whether he died in one place on the Ice or another, but he felt that he should go northward.</strong>&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 24</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;We are all men, you know, sir. All of us. <strong>All the worlds of men were settled, eons ago, from one world, Hain.</strong> We vary, but we’re all sons of the same Hearth. . .&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 37</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The king had given me the freedom of the country; I would avail myself of it. As they say in Ekumenical School, <strong>when action grows unprofitable, gather information; when information grows unprofitable, sleep.</strong> I was not sleepy, yet. I would go east to the Fastnesses, and gather information from the Foretellers, perhaps.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 44</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;It was not the answer Herbor had hoped, but it was the answer he got, and having a patient heart he went home to Charuthe with it, through the snows of Grende. He came into the Domain and into the strong-place and climbed the tower, and there found his kemmering Berosty sitting as ever blank and bleak by an ash-smothered fire, his arms lying on a table of red stone, his head sunk between his shoulders.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 47</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;My landlady, a voluble man, arranged my journey into the East. “If a person wants to visit Fastnesses he’s got to cross the Kargav. Over the mountains, into Old Karhide, to Rer, the old King’s City. Now I’ll tell you, a hearthfellow of mine runs a landboat caravan over the Eskar Pass and yesterday he was telling me over a cup of orsh that they’re going to make their first trip this summer on Getheny Osme, it having been such a warm spring and the road already clear up to Engohar and the plows will have the pass clear in another couple of days. Now you won’t catch me crossing the Kargav, Erhenrang for me and a roof over my head. But I’m a Yomeshta, praise to the nine hundred Throne-Upholders and blest be the Milk of Meshe, and one can be a Yomeshta anywhere. We’re a lot of newcomers, see, for my Lord Meshe was born 2,202 years ago, but the Old Way of the Handdara goes back ten thousand years before that. You have to go back to the Old Land if you’re after the Old Way.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 49</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;I sold another ruby to the scar-faced jeweler in Eng Street, and with no baggage but my money, my ansible, a few instruments and a change of clothes, set off as a passenger on a trade-caravan on the first day of the first month of summer. The landboats left at daybreak from the windswept loading-yards of the New Port. They drove under the Arch and turned east, twenty bulky, quiet-running, barge-like trucks on caterpillar treads, going single file down the deep streets of Erhenrang through the shadows of morning. They carried boxes of lenses, reels of soundtapes, spools of copper and platinum wire, bolts of plant-fiber cloth raised and woven in the West Fall, chests of dried fish-flakes from the Gulf, crates of ballbearings and other small machine parts, and ten truckloads of Orgota kardik-grain: all bound for the Pering Stormborder, the northeast corner of the land.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 51</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Traffic is controlled, each vehicle or caravan being required to keep in constant radio touch with checkpoints along the way. It all moves along, however crowded, quite steadily at the rate of 25 miles per hour (Terran). <strong>Gethenians could make their vehicles go faster, but they do not. If asked why not, they answer “Why?”</strong> Like asking Terrans why all our vehicles must go so fast; we answer “Why not?” No disputing tastes.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 52</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;At Third Hour we stopped for dinner at a large inn, a grand place with vast roaring fireplaces and vast beam-roofed rooms full of tables loaded with good food; but we did not stay the night. Ours was a sleeper-caravan, hurrying (in its Karhidish fashion) to be the first of the season into the Pering Storm country, to skim the cream of the market for its merchant-entrepreneurs. <strong>The truck-batteries were recharged, a new shift of drivers took over, and we went on.</strong>&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 53</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;We stood about stamping in the snow, gobbling up food and drink, backs to the bitter wind that was filled with a glittering dust of dry snow. Then back into the landboats, and on, and up. At noon in the passes of Wehoth, at about 14,000 feet, it was 82°F in the sun and 13° in the shade. <strong>The electric engines were so quiet that one could hear avalanches grumble down immense blue slopes on the far side of chasms twenty miles across.</strong>&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 54</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Legends of prediction are common throughout the whole Household of Man. God speaks, spirits speak, computers speak. <strong>Oracular ambiguity or statistical probability provides loopholes, and discrepancies are expunged by Faith.</strong>&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 58</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;“I’m not sure. I’m exceedingly ignorant—”</p>
<p>&ldquo;The young man laughed and bowed. <strong>“I am honored!” he said. “I’ve lived here three years, but haven’t yet acquired enough ignorance to be worth mentioning.”</strong></p>
<p>&ldquo;He was highly amused, but his manner was gentle, and I managed to recollect enough scraps of Handdara lore to realize that I had been boasting, very much as if I’d come up to him and said, “I’m exceedingly handsome . . .”&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 59</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;One night two Indwellers danced, men so old that their hair had whitened, and their limbs were skinny, and the downward folds at the outer eye-corners half hid their dark eyes. Their dancing was slow, precise, controlled; it fascinated eye and mind. They began dancing during Third Hour after dinner. Musicians joined in and dropped out at will, all but the drummer who never stopped his subtle changing beat. The two old dancers were still dancing at Sixth Hour, midnight, after five Terran hours. <strong>This was the first time I had seen the phenomenon of dothe—the voluntary, controlled use of what we call “hysterical strength”</strong>—and thereafter I was readier to believe tales concerning the Old Men of the Handdara.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 62</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;Faxe sat cross-legged, not moving, but charged, full of a gathering force that made his light, soft voice crack like an electric bolt.</p>
<p>&ldquo;“Ask,” he said.</p>
<p>&ldquo;I stood within the circle and asked my question. “Will this world Gethen be a member of the Ekumen of Known Worlds, five years from now?”</p>
<p>&ldquo;Silence. I stood there; I hung in the center of a spider-web woven of silence.</p>
<p>&ldquo;“It is answerable,” the Weaver said quietly. </p>
<p>&ldquo;<strong>There was a relaxation. The hooded stones seemed to soften into movement</strong>; the one who had looked so strangely at me began to whisper to his neighbor. I left the circle and joined the watchers by the hearth.&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 65</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;Beside the kemmerer sat the Pervert. “He came up from Spreve with the physician,” Goss told me. “Some Foretelling groups artificially arouse perversion in a normal person—injecting female or male hormones during the days before a session. It’s better to have a natural one. He’s willing to come; likes the notoriety.”</p>
<p>&ldquo;Goss used the pronoun that designates a male animal, not the pronoun for a human being in the masculine role of kemmer. He looked a little embarrassed. Karhiders discuss sexual matters freely, and talk about kemmer with both reverence and gusto, but they are reticent about discussing perversion—at least, they were with me. Excessive prolongation of the kemmer period, with permanent hormonal imbalance towards the male or the female, causes what they call perversion; it is not rare; three or four percent of adults may be physiological perverts or abnormals—normals, by our standard. <strong>They are not excluded from society, but they are tolerated with some disdain, as homosexuals are in many bisexual societies. The Karhidish slang for them is halfdeads. They are sterile.</strong>&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 66</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Faxe raised his hand. <strong>At once each face in the circle turned to him as if he had gathered up their gazes into a sheaf, a skein.</strong>&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 68</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;We have NAFAL ships and instantaneous transmission and mindspeech, but <strong>we haven’t yet tamed hunch to run in harness</strong>; for that trick we must go to Gethen.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 71</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;“Well, we come here to the Fastnesses mostly to learn what questions not to ask.”</p>
<p>&ldquo;“But you’re the Answerers!”</p>
<p>&ldquo;“You don’t see yet, Genry, why we perfected and practice Foretelling?”</p>
<p>&ldquo;“No—”</p>
<p>&ldquo;<strong>“To exhibit the perfect uselessness of knowing the answer to the wrong question.”</strong>&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 74</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Obsle sat sunk in his fat, watching me from his small eyes. “This will take a month’s believing,” he said. “And if it came from anyone’s mouth but yours, Estraven, I’d believe it to be pure hoax, a net for our pride woven out of starshine. But I know your stiff neck. Too stiff to stoop to an assumed disgrace in order to fool us. <strong>I can’t believe you’re speaking truth and yet I know a lie would choke you.</strong>&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 93</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;If the individual was in the female role and was impregnated, hormonal activity of course continues, and for the 8.4-month gestation period and the 6- to 8-month lactation period this individual remains female. The male sexual organs remain retracted (as they are in somer), the breasts enlarge somewhat, and the pelvic girdle widens. <strong>With the cessation of lactation the female reenters somer and becomes once more a perfect androgyne. No physiological habit is established, and the mother of several children may be the father of several more.</strong>&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 97</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Anyone can turn his hand to anything. This sounds very simple, but its psychological effects are incalculable. The fact that everyone between seventeen and thirty-five or so is liable to be (as Nim put it) “tied down to childbearing,” implies that no one is quite so thoroughly “tied down” here as women, elsewhere, are likely to be—psychologically or physically. Burden and privilege are shared out pretty equally; <strong>everybody has the same risk to run or choice to make. Therefore nobody here is quite so free as a free male anywhere else.</strong>&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 100</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;There is no division of humanity into strong and weak halves, protective/protected, dominant/submissive, owner/chattel, active/passive. In fact <strong>the whole tendency to dualism that pervades human thinking may be found to be lessened, or changed, on Winter.</strong>&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 100</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;A man wants his virility regarded, a woman wants her femininity appreciated, however indirect and subtle the indications of regard and appreciation. On Winter they will not exist. <strong>One is respected and judged only as a human being. It is an appalling experience.</strong>&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 101</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;<strong>Another guess concerning the hypothetical experiment’s object: the elimination of war.</strong> Did the Ancient Hainish postulate that continuous sexual capacity and organized social aggression, neither of which are attributes of any mammal but man, are cause and effect? Or, like Tumass Song Angot, did they consider war to be a purely masculine displacement-activity, a vast Rape, and therefore in their experiment <strong>eliminate the masculinity that rapes and the femininity that is raped?</strong>&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 102</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;<strong>I really don’t see how anyone could put much stock in victory or glory after he had spent a winter on Winter, and seen the face of the Ice.</strong>&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 103</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;I would tell my hosts in those rural Hearths and villages who I was; most of them had heard a little about me over the radio and had a vague idea what I was. They were curious, some more, some less. Few were frightened of me personally, or showed the xenophobic revulsion. An enemy, in Karhide, is not a stranger, an invader. <strong>The stranger who comes unknown is a guest. Your enemy is your neighbor.</strong>&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 104</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Now Karhide was to pull herself together and do the same; and the way to make her do it was not by sparking her pride, or building up her trade, or improving her roads, farms, colleges, and so on; none of that; that’s all civilization, veneer, and Tibe dismissed it with scorn. He was after something surer, the sure, quick, and lasting way to make people into a nation: war. His ideas concerning it could not have been too precise, but they were quite sound. <strong>The only other means of mobilizing people rapidly and entirely is with a new religion; none was handy; he would make do with war.</strong>&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 109</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;It was all golden, all benign, that week of walking; and at night before I slept I would step out of the dark farmhouse or firelit Hearth-Hall where I was lodged and <strong>walk a way into the dry stubble to look up at the stars, flaring like far cities in the windy autumn dark.</strong>&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 115</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;A brief official bulletin repeated every so often said simply that order was being and would be maintained along the Eastern Border. I liked that; it was reassuring and unprovocative, and had the quiet toughness that I had always admired in Gethenians: order will be maintained. . . . I was glad, now, to be out of <strong>Karhide, an incoherent land driven towards violence by a paranoid, pregnant king and an egomaniac Regent.</strong> I was glad to be driving sedately at twenty-five miles an hour through vast, straight-furrowed grainlands, under an even gray sky, <strong>towards a capital whose government believed in Order.</strong>&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 121</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The system of extended-family clans, of Hearths and Domains, though still vaguely discernible in the Commensal structure, was “nationalized” several hundred years ago in Orgoreyn. <strong>No child over a year old lives with its parent or parents; all are brought up in the Commensal Hearths. There is no rank by descent.</strong> Private wills are not legal: a man dying leaves his fortune to the state. <strong>All start equal.</strong>&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 124</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;His obtuseness is ignorance. His arrogance is ignorance. He is ignorant of us: we of him. <strong>He is infinitely a stranger, and I a fool, to let my shadow cross the light of the hope he brings us.</strong> I keep my mortal vanity down. I keep out of his way: for clearly that is what he wants.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 125</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;To be an atheist is to maintain God. His existence or his nonexistence, it amounts to much the same, on the plane of proof. Thus <strong>proof is a word not often used among the Handdarata, who have chosen not to treat God as a fact, subject either to proof or to belief</strong>: and they have broken the circle, and go free. <strong>To learn which questions are unanswerable, and not to answer them: this skill is most needful in times of stress and darkness.</strong>&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 126</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;One of the truckload died that night. He had been clubbed or kicked in the abdomen, and died hemorrhaging from anus and mouth. No one did anything for him; there was nothing to be done. A plastic jug of water had been shoved in amongst us some hours before, but it was long since dry. The man happened to be next to me on the right, and I took his head on my knees to give him relief in breathing: so he died. <strong>We were all naked, but thereafter I wore his blood for clothing, on my legs and thighs and hands: a dry, stiff, brown garment with no warmth in it.</strong>&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 141</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;There was kindness. I and certain others, an old man and one with a bad cough, were recognized as being least resistant to the cold, and each night we were at the center of the group, the entity of twenty-five, where it was warmest. We did not struggle for the warm place, we simply were in it each night. <strong>It is a terrible thing, this kindness that human beings do not lose.</strong> Terrible, because when we are finally naked in the dark and cold, it is all we have. We who are so rich, so full of strength, we end up with that small change. We have nothing else to give.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 143</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Night had fallen and the greater darkness, <strong>the payment for the voluntary summoning of the body’s full strength</strong>, was coming hard upon me; to darkness I must entrust myself, and him.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 162</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;“Mr. Ai, any one of you prisoners, or all of you together, could have walked out of that place, any night. If you weren’t starved, exhausted, demoralized, and drugged; and if you had winter clothing; and if you had somewhere to go….&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 164</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;“Mr. Ai, any one of you prisoners, or all of you together, could have walked out of that place, any night. If you weren’t starved, exhausted, demoralized, and drugged; and if you had winter clothing; and if you had somewhere to go…. There’s the catch. Where would you go? To a town? No papers; you’re done for. Into the wilderness? No shelter; you’re done for. <strong>In summer, I expect they bring more guards into Pulefen Farm. In winter, they use winter itself to guard it.</strong>”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 164</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;“Mr. Ai, <strong>we’ve seen the same events with different eyes; I wrongly thought they’d seem the same to us.</strong>&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 165</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;“But for what purpose—all this intriguing, this hiding and power-seeking and plotting—what was it all for, Estraven? What were you after?”</p>
<p>&ldquo;“I was after what you’re after: the alliance of my world with your worlds. What did you think?”</p>
<p>&ldquo;We were staring at each other across the glowing stove like a pair of wooden dolls.</p>
<p>&ldquo;“You mean, even if it was Orgoreyn that made the alliance—?”</p>
<p>&ldquo;“Even if it was Orgoreyn. Karhide would soon have followed. Do you think I would play shifgrethor when so much is at stake for all of us, all my fellow men? <strong>What does it matter which country wakens first, so long as we waken?</strong>”&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 165</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;<strong>I never knew a person who reacted so wholly and rapidly to a changed situation as Estraven.</strong> I was recovering, and willing to go; he was out of thangen; the instant that was all clear, he was off. <strong>He was never rash or hurried, but he was always ready.</strong>&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 169</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Estraven sat a long time by the stove that night figuring out precisely what we had and how and when we must use it. We had no scales, and he had to estimate, using a pound box of gichy-michy as standard. <strong>He knew, as do many Gethenians, the caloric and nutritive value of each food; he knew his own requirements under various conditions, and how to estimate mine pretty closely.</strong> Such knowledge has high survival-value, on Winter.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 171</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;<strong>How does one hate a country, or love one?</strong> Tibe talks about it; I lack the trick of it. I know people, I know towns, farms, hills and rivers and rocks, I know how the sun at sunset in autumn falls on the side of a certain plowland in the hills; but <strong>what is the sense of giving a boundary to all that, of giving it a name and ceasing to love where the name ceases to apply?</strong>&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 176</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;<strong>Estraven stood there in harness beside me looking at that magnificent and unspeakable desolation. “I’m glad I have lived to see this,” he said.</strong> I felt as he did. It is good to have an end to journey towards; but it is the journey that matters, in the end. It had not rained, here on these north-facing slopes. Snow-fields stretched down from the pass into the valleys of moraine. We stowed the wheels, uncapped the sledge-runners, put on our skis, and took off—down, north, onward, <strong>into that silent vastness of fire and ice that said in enormous letters of black and white DEATH, DEATH, written right across a continent. The sledge pulled like a feather, and we laughed with joy.</strong>&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 182</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Long since in Erhenrang he had explained to me how time is shortened inside the ships that go almost as fast as starlight between the stars, but I had not laid this fact down against the length of a man’s life, or the lives he leaves behind him on his own world. <strong>While he lived a few hours in one of those unimaginable ships going from one planet to another, everyone he had left behind him at home grew old and died, and their children grew old</strong>…. I said at last, “I thought myself an exile.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 185</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;“Fire and fear, good servants, bad lords.” He makes fear serve him. I would have let fear lead me around by the long way. Courage and reason are with him. <strong>What good seeking the safe course, on a journey such as this? There are senseless courses, which I shall not take; but there is no safe one.</strong>&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 190</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The world around us, ice and rock, ash and snow, fire and dark, trembles and twitches and mutters. Looking out a minute ago I saw <strong>the glow of the volcano as a dull red bloom on the belly of vast clouds overhanging the darkness.</strong>&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 191</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Tonight my extreme physical awareness of him was rather hard to ignore, and I was too tired to divert it into untrance or any other channel of the discipline. Finally he asked, had he offended me? I explained my silence, with some embarrassment. I was afraid he would laugh at me. After all he is no more an oddity, a sexual freak, than I am; <strong>up here on the Ice each of us is singular, isolate, I as cut off from those like me, from my society and its rules, as he from his.</strong> There is no world full of other Gethenians here to explain and support my existence. We are equals at last, equal, alien, alone. He did not laugh, of course. Rather he spoke with a gentleness that I did not know was in him. After a while he too came to speak of isolation, of loneliness.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 194</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Edondurath built a house of the frozen bodies of his brothers, and waited there inside that house for that last one to come back. Each day one of the corpses would speak, saying, “Does he burn? Does he burn?” All the other corpses would say with frozen tongues, “No, no.” Then Edondurath entered kemmer as he slept, and moved and spoke aloud in dreams, and when he woke the corpses were all saying, “He burns! He burns!” And the last brother, the youngest one, heard them saying that, and came into the house of bodies and there coupled with Edondurath. Of these two were the nations of men born, out of the flesh of Edondurath, out of Edondurath’s womb. The name of the other, the younger brother, the father, his name is not known.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 200</div></div><p>What an incredible imagination Le Guid has.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;They are in the middle of time. In the beginning there was the sun and the ice, and there was no shadow. In the end when we are done, the sun will devour itself and shadow will eat light, and there will be nothing left but the ice and the darkness.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 202</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;His face in the reddish light was as soft, as vulnerable, <strong>as remote as the face of a woman who looks at you out of her thoughts and does not speak.</strong>&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 209</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Young children, and defectives, and members of unevolved or regressed societies, can’t mindspeak. The mind must exist on a certain plane of complexity first. <strong>You can’t build up amino acids out of hydrogen atoms; a good deal of complexifying has to take place first</strong>: the same situation. Abstract thought, varied social interaction, intricate cultural adjustments, esthetic and ethical perception, all of it has to reach a certain level before the connections can be made—before the potentiality can be touched at all.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 211</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;This blizzard lasted two days; there were five days lost, and there would be more. Nimmer and Anner are the months of the great storms. “We’re beginning to cut it rather fine, aren’t we?” I said one night as I measured out our gichy-michy ration and put it to soak in hot water. He looked at me. His firm, broad face showed weight-loss in deep shadows under the cheekbones, his eyes were sunken and his mouth sorely chapped and cracked. God knows what I looked like, when he looked like that. <strong>He smiled. “With luck we shall make it, and without luck we shall not.”</strong>&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 216</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Overnight the weather thickened somewhat. All brightness was gone, leaving nothing. We stepped out of the tent onto nothing. Sledge and tent were there, Estraven stood beside me, but <strong>neither he nor I cast any shadow. There was dull light all around, everywhere. When we walked on the crisp snow no shadow showed the footprint. We left no track. Sledge, tent, himself, myself: nothing else at all. No sun, no sky, no horizon, no world. A whitish-gray void, in which we appeared to hang.</strong> The illusion was so complete that I had trouble keeping my balance. My inner ears were used to confirmation from my eyes as to how I stood; they got none; I might as well be blind. It was all right while we loaded up, but hauling, with nothing ahead, nothing to look at, nothing for the eye to touch, as it were, it was at first disagreeable and then exhausting.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 219</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;[…] we saw them plainly before sunset: <strong>nunataks</strong>, great scored and ravaged pinnacles of rock jutting up out of the ice, no more of them showing than shows of an iceberg above the sea: <strong>cold drowned mountains, dead for eons.</strong>&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 220</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;In the white weather one could not see a crevasse until one could look down into it—a little late, for the edges overhung, and were not always solid. Every footfall was a surprise, a drop or a jolt. <strong>No shadows. An even, white, soundless sphere: we moved along inside a huge frosted-glass ball. There was nothing inside the ball, and nothing was outside it.</strong> But there were cracks in the glass. Probe and step, probe and step. Probe for the invisible cracks through which one might fall out of the white glass ball, and fall, and fall, and fall…. An unrelaxable tension little by little took hold of all my muscles. It became exceedingly difficult to take even one more step.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 223</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;It was good to be released from forever pulling and pushing and hauling and prying that sledge, and I said so to Estraven as we went on. <strong>He glanced back at the sledge, a bit of refuse in the vast torment of ice and reddish rock. “It did well,” he said. His loyalty extended without disproportion to things</strong>, the patient, obstinate, reliable things that we use and get used to, the things we live by. He missed the sledge.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 226</div></div><p>As would I.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;<strong>“Sometimes you must go against the wheel’s turn,” Estraven said.</strong> He was as steady as ever, but in his walk, his voice, his bearing, vigor had been replaced by patience, and <strong>certainty by stubborn resolve</strong>.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 232</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;I remembered his voice last night, saying with all mildness, “I’d rather be in Karhide. . .” And I wondered, not for the first time, what patriotism is, what the love of country truly consists of, how that yearning loyalty that had shaken my friend’s voice arises, and <strong>how so real a love can become, too often, so foolish and vile a bigotry. Where does it go wrong?</strong>&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 234</div></div>      </div>
      </div>
        <div class="footer">
    <div class="footer-data"><div class="footer-links"><ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/contact.php" title="">Contact</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/support.php" title="">Support</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/privacy.php" title="">Privacy</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/rights.php" title="">Rights</a></li></ul></div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="copyright">Copyright (c) 1999-2026 earthli.com. All Rights Reserved.</div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="versions">Powered by <ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore/app_news.php">earthli News 3.7</a></li><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore" title="">earthli WebCore&trade; 3.7</a></li></ul></div></div>    </div>
      </div>
  </div>  </body>
</html>
]]>
  </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
      <title type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[The Dungeon Anarchist's Cookbook: Dungeon Crawler Carl Book 3 by Matt Dinniman (2021) (read in 2025)]]>
  </title>
    <id>https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=5416</id>
    <link href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=5416"/>
    <updated>2025-06-04T22:35:45+02:00</updated>
    <author>
        <name type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[Marco von Ballmoos]]>
  </name>
      <uri>https://earthli.com/users/marco</uri>
    </author>
      <summary type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<p><small class="notes">Standard disclaimer [1]</small></p>
<p><a href="https://www.earthli.com/data/news/attachments/entry/5416/book_cover_-_the_dungeon_anarchist_s_cookbook-_dungeon_crawler_carl_book_3.webp"><img src="https://www.earthli.com/data/news/attachments/entry/5416/book_cover_-_the_dungeon_anarchist_s_cookbook-_dungeon_crawler_carl_book_3_tn.webp" alt=" " class=" align-right"></a>This is the third in a series of reviews that so far includes <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=5402">Book 1</a> and <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=5412">Book 2</a>. Carl recieves the titular <em>Dungeon Anarchist&rsquo;s Cookbook</em>, which is a special book that only he can read. It&rsquo;s a compendium of the experiences of dozens if not hundreds of other crawlers throughout... [<a class="complete-text-link" href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=5416">More</a>]</p>
]]>
  </summary>
      <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<html lang="en">
  <head>
    <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/themes/ice.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/fonts/raleway.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/core/medium.css">
  </head>
  <body>
<div class="style-controls">  <div class="page">
    <div class="page-body">
<div class="info-box-top">
<p>
Published by <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_user.php?name=marco" title="Marco von Ballmoos" class="visible">marco</a> on <span class="date-time">4. Jun 2025 22:35:45 (GMT-5)</span>
</p>
</div>
      <div class="text-flow wide">
  <p><small class="notes">Standard disclaimer [1]</small></p>
<p><a href="https://www.earthli.com/data/news/attachments/entry/5416/book_cover_-_the_dungeon_anarchist_s_cookbook-_dungeon_crawler_carl_book_3.webp"><img src="https://www.earthli.com/data/news/attachments/entry/5416/book_cover_-_the_dungeon_anarchist_s_cookbook-_dungeon_crawler_carl_book_3_tn.webp" alt=" " class=" align-right"></a>This is the third in a series of reviews that so far includes <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=5402">Book 1</a> and <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=5412">Book 2</a>. Carl recieves the titular <em>Dungeon Anarchist&rsquo;s Cookbook</em>, which is a special book that only he can read. It&rsquo;s a compendium of the experiences of dozens if not hundreds of other crawlers throughout the myriad seasons that passed before the Earth season chronicled in these books.</p>
<p>The book introduces itself to him,</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Hello, Crawler. As you’re about to find, this is a very special book. If you’re reading these words, it means this book has found its way into your hands for one purpose and one purpose only. <strong>Together, we will burn it all to the ground.</strong>&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 121</div></div><p>This is the first inkling that we have that other former crawlers are working in the background to exact their revenge on the showrunners, on the game, on the dungeon, on the factions, on the galactic society that would not only allow an unjust travesty like this to exist, but to seek to profit off of the suffering, enslavement, and annihilation of entire worlds and species. I may be reading a bit too much into it, but things are getting distinctly &ldquo;workers of the world unite; all you have to lose is your chains,&rdquo; [2] and I am absolutely here for it. </p>
<p>The book goes on,</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;While the true contents of this guide are invisible to the showrunners and to the viewers, it is not invisible to the current System AI. There is nothing about owning this book, or the information hidden within that is against the rules. However, if the organization running this season begins to suspect that this book is more than it appears, or if you tell anyone about the existence of this book, the information within will erase, and you will forever lose access to the hidden text.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 123</div></div><p>The ground rules are set and this book will contribute vastly to Carl&rsquo;s knowledge about the mechanics of the game world. He has to constantly hide this knowledge or plausibly pretend that he&rsquo;d obtained it elsewhere. In the next books, many of the little chapter introductions will be snippets from this book, attributed to former crawlers, noting their seasons.</p>
<p>At the very beginning of this story, Mordecai is confronted with another former crawler—Chaco—who used to be his best friend but with whom he has such an open sore of a beef that even the normally cool and calculating Mordecai gets himself banned for the entirety of the fourth level, leaving Carl, Donut, and Katia to figure everything out for themselves.</p>
<p>Carl builds out his communal approach to the dungeon on this level, fist-bumping and befriending as many people as he possibly can. They all start crowd-sourcing information about the levels, working together to help as many crawlers survive as possible.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Still, people kept messaging me directly. I was spending a lot of time explaining what little we knew about the trains. It was important people had all the information, and I wanted to help, but I was shocked at how little some people had managed to figure out after three full days of this.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 208</div></div><p>They hook back up with Team Meadow Lark, where Elle—the 99-year-old lady—has become a powerful and extremely sassy fairy.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;She looked back at the badger. “Fuck, man. There’s like five real people in here. Are you fermenting the potatoes yourself? I do want another drink. My friend Carl is paying for it. But then we’re going to have another one after that, and I’m paying for that one. And don’t give me a shitty pour like last time. Carl is having what I’m having. Donut, what do you want?”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 129</div></div><p>Elle is low-key kind-of awesome. She is a hardcore killer and takes no shit. She is one of the funnier characters and has taken to her new lease on life in the dungeon with gusto.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;[…] going from a dementia-suffering, 99-year-old woman in a wheelchair to this fairy ice mage was going to alter one’s personality. But there was more to it, too. She had an edge to her. In the short time I’d known the woman before, I’d caught hints of that, but I hadn’t realized she was so… loud. I wondered how close this personality matched with how she was when she’d been younger.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 131</div></div><p>Carl also gets on more shows, meeting more and different aliens. This is where Dinniman&rsquo;s imagination goes into overdrive. He really seems to be interested in inventing new mythologies and new creatures that aren&rsquo;t derived from anything I&rsquo;d read before. For example, here&rsquo;s a vivid and relentlessly unflattering description of an alien with baggy skin  that is too big for its frame.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The sickly, pale creature sat in the chair, naked except for his engineer’s hat. What I’d taken for a poncho was actually just flesh that didn’t properly fit his form. He had no muscles or definition to his body. The green-tinted flesh hung off of him like a fitted sheet placed on a too-small bed. The right side of his face hung loosely. When he spoke, the hole for his mouth hung below the bottom of his jawline, and the words came from the nose holes. The nose itself appeared like it was supposed to be hooked, but it hung to the side, dangling like a used condom on the side of the creature’s face. The eye holes drooped, revealing yellow bone. Clumps of black hair clung to the head.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 179</div></div><p>Not only does Dinniman fill in more information about the alien civilizations that participate in the economy of the crawl, but he also discusses how this season is particularly bad and cheaply done—the <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Enshittification">enshittification</a> (<cite><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/">Wikipedia</a></cite>) of the dungeon world because this season&rsquo;s sponsor is cheap, or out of money, or … whatever.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The robot sighed. “I apologize, Carl. Let me translate it to earth monkey speak. The mudskippers are cheap bastards who have built this entire crawl with spit and duct tape and items they have purchased at the equivalent of an interstellar swap meet. Everything is built with very little regard for system security and is done as cheaply as possible. The fact it hasn’t yet broken down or bitten them in the ass is a testament to the very real existence of the concept of ‘dumb luck.’ Do you understand now?”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 298</div></div><p><span style="width: 200px; display: table" class=" align-right"><span class="auto-content-inline"><a href="https://www.earthli.com/data/news/attachments/entry/5416/karl_marx.webp"><img src="https://www.earthli.com/data/news/attachments/entry/5416/karl_marx_tn.webp" alt=" " style="width: 200px"></a></span><span class="auto-content-caption"><a href="https://www.earthli.com/data/news/attachments/entry/5416/karl_marx.webp">Karl Marx</a></span></span>This series is very much about hating on giant mega-corporations whose only concern is to gain as much profit for themselves as possible. The economics are pretty clear. The politics are also getting clearer and clearer, as in the citation below, You see what I mean about the workers-of-the-world-unite vibe?</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Sometimes the galaxy isn’t a happy place. Sometimes the unwashed masses forget their place in the machine. And sometimes these dregs bubble up to the surface, causing a phenomenon widely known as “Civil Unrest.” And when that happens, the powers that be don’t want to become the powers that were. So they hire backup. An outside force to come down and kick everything back into order, and maybe commit a few war crimes in the process just so the filth knows their place. One such outfit, trained specifically for this sort of situation, is the Shade Gnoll Riot Forces.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 429</div></div><p>Dinniman is also a big fan of <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chekhov%27s_gun">Chekhov&rsquo;s guns</a>, with the nearly exploded Soul Crystal from the previous book—still unused as of the middle of book six—and also this weird note near the end of this book,</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;I focused on Katia. The blood spread out from her in a circle. It hadn’t gone straight up, but in every direction around her. She hadn’t been touched. Holy shit. There wasn’t a single damn drop of blood on her. <strong>I had a thought. An exploit. I wondered how well it would work. But it was definitely something they’d patch if I even tried it. I filed that information away.</strong>&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 438</div></div><p>I wonder if the idea is: Store a dangerous liquid in a container in your inventory. Take it out of the container in your inventory. Liquid sprays in all directions, not touching you. At any rate, he hasn&rsquo;t used this information as of the middle of the sixth book, either.</p>
<p>But I picture Dinniman&rsquo;s entire house to be filled with paper and red thread, so I also don&rsquo;t quite believe that he&rsquo;s forgotten all about it.</p>
<p><span style="width: 600px; display: table"><span class="auto-content-inline"><a href="https://www.earthli.com/data/news/attachments/entry/5416/dinniman_s_living_room.webp"><img src="https://www.earthli.com/data/news/attachments/entry/5416/dinniman_s_living_room.webp" alt=" " style="width: 600px"></a></span><span class="auto-content-caption"><a href="https://www.earthli.com/data/news/attachments/entry/5416/dinniman_s_living_room.webp">Dinniman&#039;s living room</a></span></span></p>
<p>Even that picture probably doesn&rsquo;t do it justice: he seems to be able to invent an endless array of monsters, creatures, characters, classes, guilds, organizations, pantheons, and historical facts.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The second portrait was that of Grull. He was a black-skinned, overly-muscular minotaur-like beast, but with a horse’s body. A centaur with the head of a big, pissed-off bull complete with a golden ring in its snout. He held a smoking, double-headed axe.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 492</div></div><p>On page 400, Dinniman mentions <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lisa_Frank">Lisa Frank</a>, which is a <a href="https://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=deep+cut"><em>deep cut</em></a>, referring to brightly colored notebook and binder covers from 80s and 90s. [3] I found this one, which makes me wonder whether Dinniman got the idea for Donut while daydreaming and staring at the notebook cover of the girl he was in love with in Social Studies.</p>
<p><span style="width: 468px; display: table"><span class="auto-content-inline"><a href="https://www.earthli.com/data/news/attachments/entry/5416/lisa_frank_donut_cover.webp"><img src="https://www.earthli.com/data/news/attachments/entry/5416/lisa_frank_donut_cover.webp" alt=" " style="width: 468px"></a></span><span class="auto-content-caption"><a href="https://www.earthli.com/data/news/attachments/entry/5416/lisa_frank_donut_cover.webp">Lisa Frank Notebook Cover featuring Donut?</a></span></span></p>
<p>As with the previous book, the plot is super-complex with a lot of stuff to learn about color-coding and numbering and so on. The main highlights are that we are in level four, <em>The Iron Tangle</em>, which is a giant system of trains, running on tracks that the crawlers would eventually discover is in the shape of the Syndicate&rsquo;s logo. The <a href="https://dungeon-crawler-carl.fandom.com/wiki/Category:Syndicate">Syndicate</a> is the umbrella organization that runs the dungeon and includes many, many members and entities.</p>
<p>There is a lot of train stuff going on, Katia gets a lot more powerful and a lot more empowered and useful, and Carl&rsquo;s plans encompass nearly everyone in the dungeon, trying to save as many crawlers as possible. Some of the utility cars have a teleporting scoop on the front that transport things instantly to a disposal area. They end up destroying most of the level, dumping train after train into &ldquo;the abyss&rdquo;. Katia&rsquo;s beef with Hekla comes to a head, with Hekla trying a coup of sorts to get Donat onto her team. None of that works, with Katia flattening Hekla in one fell swoop and Eva on the run sans one hand.</p>
<p>They end up teleporting a station mimic that&rsquo;s actually a province boss to the escape station, Carl summons the God Grull, who&rsquo;s being &ldquo;driven&rdquo; by his arch-nemesis the Maestro (an ogre). They manage to save most of the crawlers with a daring plan (as usual). I know that none of this makes a lick of sense if you haven&rsquo;t already read the books, but perhaps it&rsquo;s a nice reminder for those who have read it. As with the other reviews, check out <a href="https://dungeon-crawler-carl.fandom.com/wiki/Dungeon_Anarchist%27s_Cookbook_(Book)">official wiki for book 3</a> for more details.</p>
<p>Carl&rsquo;s last entry in the cookbook (for now) is,</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;If we’re really going to burn this place to the ground, we need to actually do it and not just talk about it. We need to start killing them, too. I don’t know for sure how to do it yet, but I’ll come up with something. They will not break me. Fuck them all. They will not break me. But I will break them. This is my promise to myself, to my friends, and to you, anyone who reads these words. I will break them all.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 508</div></div><p><hr></p>
<div class="footnote-reference"><span id="footnote_DRAFTABLE_ENTRY_5416_1_body" class="footnote-number">[1]</span> Disclaimer: these are notes I took while reading this book. They include citations I found interesting or enlightening or particularly well-written. In some cases, I&rsquo;ve pointed out which of these applies to which citation; in others, I have not. Any benefit you gain from reading these notes is purely incidental to the purpose they serve of reminding me of what I once read. Please see Wikipedia for a summary if I&rsquo;ve failed to provide one sufficient for your purposes. If my notes serve to trigger an interest in this book, then I&rsquo;m happy for you.</div><div class="footnote-reference"><span id="footnote_DRAFTABLE_ENTRY_5416_2_body" class="footnote-number">[2]</span> <p>for once, I find the <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Workers_of_the_world,_unite!">English translation</a> (<cite><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/">Wikipedia</a></cite>) to be a bit sexier than the <a href="https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Liste_gefl&uuml;gelter_Worte/P#Proletarier_aller_L&auml;nder,_vereinigt_euch!">original German</a> (<cite><a href="http://de.wikipedia.org/">Wikipedia</a></cite>),</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Die Proletarier haben nichts in ihr zu verlieren als ihre Ketten. Sie haben eine Welt zu gewinnen. Proletarier aller Länder vereinigt Euch!&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="footnote-reference"><span id="footnote_DRAFTABLE_ENTRY_5416_3_body" class="footnote-number">[3]</span> I refuse to reveal whether I had one or more of these or not. Let&rsquo;s say it was my twin sister, ok?</div><h2>Citations</h2><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;I was about to toss the book into my inventory, but instead I flipped to the first page. It read, “Welcome.” I felt the haptic buzz of my Escape Plan skill activate. Additional words appeared on the mostly-blank page. Hello, Crawler. As you’re about to find, this is a very special book. If you’re reading these words, it means this book has found its way into your hands for one purpose and one purpose only. Together, we will burn it all to the ground.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 121</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;While the true contents of this guide are invisible to the showrunners and to the viewers, it is not invisible to the current System AI. There is nothing about owning this book, or the information hidden within that is against the rules. However, if the organization running this season begins to suspect that this book is more than it appears, or if you tell anyone about the existence of this book, the information within will erase, and you will forever lose access to the hidden text.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 123</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Most of the other crawlers didn’t have a manager at all. I’d grown to rely on him, sending him queries every time I ran across something I didn’t recognize. We were going to have to suck it up and figure out the rest of this floor without him. Both Daniel Bautista and the book showed me the importance of crowdsourcing information. And while the bounty was a big concern, we couldn’t let it force ourselves into isolation. I needed to get out there and add as many people as I could to my chat.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 125</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;She looked back at the badger. “Fuck, man. There’s like five real people in here. Are you fermenting the potatoes yourself? I do want another drink. My friend Carl is paying for it. But then we’re going to have another one after that, and I’m paying for that one. And don’t give me a shitty pour like last time. Carl is having what I’m having. Donut, what do you want?”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 129</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;[…] going from a dementia-suffering, 99-year-old woman in a wheelchair to this fairy ice mage was going to alter one’s personality. But there was more to it, too. She had an edge to her. In the short time I’d known the woman before, I’d caught hints of that, but I hadn’t realized she was so… loud. I wondered how close this personality matched with how she was when she’d been younger.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 131</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The two rock monsters stared at us curiously. They’d fucked up, but I suspected I’d just saved their rocky asses. I’d trust them much more than someone else. Especially if that someone else knew we were responsible for their friends getting fired, or worse.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 139</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The sickly, pale creature sat in the chair, naked except for his engineer’s hat. What I’d taken for a poncho was actually just flesh that didn’t properly fit his form. He had no muscles or definition to his body. The green-tinted flesh hung off of him like a fitted sheet placed on a too-small bed. The right side of his face hung loosely. When he spoke, the hole for his mouth hung below the bottom of his jawline, and the words came from the nose holes. The nose itself appeared like it was supposed to be hooked, but it hung to the side, dangling like a used condom on the side of the creature’s face. The eye holes drooped, revealing yellow bone. Clumps of black hair clung to the head.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 179</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;I held up a third finger. A hole appeared in the metal plate. Fast as I could, I reached through, grasped the surprised elf-like creature by his long, silver hair, and pulled. The moment I pulled his head through the hole, Donut snapped off the spell. I let go, and the severed head dropped to the ground, mouth still open wide. “What was that, bitch? I didn’t quite get that last part,” I said.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 185</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Comfort I didn’t realize how much I needed.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 192</div></div><p>His limited tenses make this sentence a mess. I&rsquo;m not going to bitch too much more about it but this book in particular was awash in questionable grammar and a paucity of verb cases.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The show moved to feature several crawlers it didn’t normally show, including Quan Ch, the one crawler who’d received a Celestial Quest box at the end of the last floor. Donut grumbled as she watched him fly down a train tunnel on his ethereal wings, shooting blue lightning out of his left hand. He blasted the front of a train, which crumpled and stopped dead on the track. A mantaur corpse fell out the front of the destroyed cockpit. “That jacket he got lets him fly and shoot lightning,” I said. “That’s pretty cool. But if he’s flying around blasting trains, that’s going to cause all sorts of problems. I wonder what line that is.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 198</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;We watched Elle pick up a clurichaun, freeze his head, rip it off, and throw it to another party member. This guy, some sort of muscle man class, twisted in the air and hurled the ice ball at a giant goat boss. It slammed into the goat’s head, staggering it. A menagerie of other creatures, the former residents of Meadow Lark, rushed the goat monster and tore it to pieces.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 199</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;I watched Donut train with the hole spell while we waited for the Nightmare Express to come for the second time. She’d gotten the spell up to level three. She was practicing with making the hole a smaller diameter. She’d figured out how to cast the spell, and with Mongo standing right there, she could cast Clockwork Triplicate, and the two extra Mongos would appear on the other side of the hole. We’d be able to clear rooms without having to open doors.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 205</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;I’d sat at the bar for the hour, staring glumly at my drink. I was approached a half of a dozen times,&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 207</div></div><p>One more grammar maybe: here, &ldquo;I was&rdquo; should be &ldquo;I&rsquo;d been&rdquo; but Dinniman hates the word &ldquo;had&rdquo;.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Still, people kept messaging me directly. I was spending a lot of time explaining what little we knew about the trains. It was important people had all the information, and I wanted to help, but I was shocked at how little some people had managed to figure out after three full days of this.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 208</div></div><p>Yeah. That tracks.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;Katia returned to her spiked She-Hulk form. It was about as big as she dared go and still be able to—barely—fit through most doors. Donut jumped onto the back of Mongo.</p>
<p>&ldquo;“Ready guys?” I said. I cracked my neck. I cast Bang Bro onto my gauntlet. It hissed with energy. “Let’s do this.”&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 242</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;I exchanged a look with Katia. “I don’t know, Donut. I don’t like the idea of you doing that alone. You might need hands to control it.”</p>
<p>&ldquo;“If that little pervert can work the controls, then I can figure it out,” Donut said. “Besides, do you really think you can climb that chain? It’s quite long. Mongo will be ready to graduate college by the time you get up there. I can do it quick. I can Puddle Jump if I have to, but I’d rather save it for coming back.”</p>
<p>&ldquo;“Okay,” I said after a moment. “Just be careful.”</p>
<p>&ldquo;“I’m always careful, Carl,” Donut said, shooting another missile. “I’m going out there.”&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 257</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;She beamed. “It was my idea. We tell them that if they wear the armband during one more run, the Kravyad will know to teleport them straight home at the end of the shift. But really it lets the Kravyad know they’re troublemakers who are okay to eat. It added another 5% to our productivity in Q2. Even Rod was impressed.”</p>
<p>&ldquo;Donut: I DON’T LIKE THIS LADY. SHE’S ONE OF THOSE PEOPLE WHO IS REALLY MEAN BUT DOESN’T THINK THEY’RE MEAN.</p>
<p>&ldquo;Carl: No kidding.&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 267</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;That was why Maggie had killed her own daughter. She was in pain from the explosion. She wasn’t going to heal. The pain wasn’t going to stop. Not as long as I was alive.</p>
<p>&ldquo;“She was beautiful, you know. On the inside, I mean. She didn’t have that anger in her. Not like her mother. Or her dad. When she ran away, it wasn’t because she was a bad kid. It was self-defense. Kids aren’t always a product of their parents. But sometimes that doesn’t matter. Sometimes parents can cast a shadow so thick, you can drown in it.”</p>
<p>&ldquo;That poor girl. Jesus, she must’ve been so scared. I felt no sympathy for the man next to me. He deserved all the pain he was feeling right at that moment. But I understood him a little better now.&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 292</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The robot sighed. “I apologize, Carl. Let me translate it to earth monkey speak. The mudskippers are cheap bastards who have built this entire crawl with spit and duct tape and items they have purchased at the equivalent of an interstellar swap meet. Everything is built with very little regard for system security and is done as cheaply as possible. The fact it hasn’t yet broken down or bitten them in the ass is a testament to the very real existence of the concept of ‘dumb luck.’ Do you understand now?”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 298</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;Remind me sometime, and I’ll tell you the story of Unsinkable Sam. He was a famous cat from World War II who survived multiple ship sinkings.”</p>
<p>&ldquo;“I didn’t know about this,” Donut said. “So he was a hero cat?”</p>
<p>&ldquo;“Every boat he served on ended up at the bottom of the ocean. I don’t know if that makes him a hero.”</p>
<p>&ldquo;“But he survived?”</p>
<p>&ldquo;“Yep,” I said. “Ended up dying of old age.”</p>
<p>&ldquo;“Sounds like a hero to me,” Donut said.&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 299</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;[…] this guy had it even worse. He’d been tricked into believing something that just wasn’t real. He never even had the opportunity to screw it up. Before this was done, people like him would kill people like me by the thousands. And people like me would cleave through his kind, wreaking even more damage. All the while the real culprits sat back and watched and laughed.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 320</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Focus on what you can accomplish, not that which is beyond your control.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 320</div></div><p>This is terrible advice. How does anything interesting get done if everyone stays in their lane? If you only focus on what you can control, then you can be controlled by anyone who convinces you that certain things are beyond your control.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;New achievement! Mentally Unstable Clothing Hoarder! You have over 500 of the exact same, stackable clothing item in your inventory. What the hell is wrong with you? You planning on opening a thrift store? You might want to see a shrink. One that your group doesn’t immediately kill. Reward: We don’t reward this sort of behavior. It’s weird.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 364</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Elle: Same ol’ shit. Imani is mother hen-ing every damn person in here, even though they’re all terrified of her. Your friend Li Jun doesn’t know his best friend is in love with his sister even though she’s turned into a demon, and most of those girls from Hekla’s group are as helpless as I was when I was still in the wheelchair. On top of that, some crazy asshole who doesn’t want everybody to think he’s a crazy asshole is throwing a train full of explosives in our direction. So, you know. Typical day.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 399</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Bautista: The trains are definitely working. It’s raining crashed trains and monsters into the abyss. I haven’t seen any crawlers fall thankfully. But it’s a lot of those giant monsters. Are you getting experience for this? They’re splattering across the bottom of the abyss like hail.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 400</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Sometimes the galaxy isn’t a happy place. Sometimes the unwashed masses forget their place in the machine. And sometimes these dregs bubble up to the surface, causing a phenomenon widely known as “Civil Unrest.” And when that happens, the powers that be don’t want to become the powers that were. So they hire backup. An outside force to come down and kick everything back into order, and maybe commit a few war crimes in the process just so the filth knows their place. One such outfit, trained specifically for this sort of situation, is the Shade Gnoll Riot Forces.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 429</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;I focused on Katia. The blood spread out from her in a circle. It hadn’t gone straight up, but in every direction around her. She hadn’t been touched. Holy shit. There wasn’t a single damn drop of blood on her. I had a thought. An exploit. I wondered how well it would work. But it was definitely something they’d patch if I even tried it. I filed that information away.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 438</div></div><p>I wonder if the idea is: Store a dangerous liquid in a container in your inventory. Take it out of the container in your inventory. Liquid sprays in all directions, not touching you.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;He pointed to the second circle of the logo, then tapped the Nightmare line again.</p>
<p>&ldquo;“See here, it matches up perfectly. The named trains make a specific pattern. That means there is a train that has to loop to the front. Probably at this station here. Yes, look, you discovered it already. The Escape Velocity line. Yeah, that makes sense. Escape Velocity is the name of the ship that discovered the worm hole to the first system where a Gleener scientific crew investigating a Primal ship graveyard came across the Vog Generation Ship. A few hundred cycles later, the Syndicate was formed. So it’s obvious once you know what you’re looking for.”&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 443</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The second portrait was that of Grull. He was a black-skinned, overly-muscular minotaur-like beast, but with a horse’s body. A centaur with the head of a big, pissed-off bull complete with a golden ring in its snout. He held a smoking, double-headed axe.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 492</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Grull screamed, his voice as loud as one of those alarm traps. He held the gigantic axe in the air. The handle looked to be a living oak tree, and the metal head of the axe moved, as if it was made of still-molten metal. He swung it up over his head, the axe trailing smoke. The top of the weapon seemed to clear the roof of the chamber by inches. He swung down, hitting nothing. He swung the axe a few times, as if testing the weight and heft of the weapon, which was the size of a goddamned passenger jet in his meaty hands.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 494</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;If we’re really going to burn this place to the ground, we need to actually do it and not just talk about it. We need to start killing them, too. I don’t know for sure how to do it yet, but I’ll come up with something. They will not break me. Fuck them all. They will not break me. But I will break them. This is my promise to myself, to my friends, and to you, anyone who reads these words. I will break them all.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 508</div></div>      </div>
      </div>
        <div class="footer">
    <div class="footer-data"><div class="footer-links"><ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/contact.php" title="">Contact</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/support.php" title="">Support</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/privacy.php" title="">Privacy</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/rights.php" title="">Rights</a></li></ul></div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="copyright">Copyright (c) 1999-2026 earthli.com. All Rights Reserved.</div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="versions">Powered by <ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore/app_news.php">earthli News 3.7</a></li><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore" title="">earthli WebCore&trade; 3.7</a></li></ul></div></div>    </div>
      </div>
  </div>  </body>
</html>
]]>
  </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
      <title type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[Carl's Doomsday Scenario: Book 2 by Matt Dinniman (2020) (read in 2025)]]>
  </title>
    <id>https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=5412</id>
    <link href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=5412"/>
    <updated>2025-06-01T12:12:04+02:00</updated>
    <author>
        <name type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[Marco von Ballmoos]]>
  </name>
      <uri>https://earthli.com/users/marco</uri>
    </author>
      <summary type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<p><small class="notes">Standard disclaimer [1]</small></p>
<p><a href="https://www.earthli.com/data/news/attachments/entry/5412/carls-doomsday-scenario-dungeon-crawler-carl-book-2-web-768x768-1493092330.webp"><img src="https://www.earthli.com/data/news/attachments/entry/5412/carls-doomsday-scenario-dungeon-crawler-carl-book-2-web-768x768-1493092330_tn.webp" alt=" " class=" align-right"></a>This is book two of the Dungeon-Crawler Carl series. I&rsquo;d read <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=5402">Dungeon Crawler Carl: Book 1</a> and moved on immediately to this book. This is a really, really fun series, written by a smart and funny author who has a good amount of world experience that he brings to his wild and... [<a class="complete-text-link" href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=5412">More</a>]</p>
]]>
  </summary>
      <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<html lang="en">
  <head>
    <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/themes/ice.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/fonts/raleway.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/core/medium.css">
  </head>
  <body>
<div class="style-controls">  <div class="page">
    <div class="page-body">
<div class="info-box-top">
<p>
Published by <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_user.php?name=marco" title="Marco von Ballmoos" class="visible">marco</a> on <span class="date-time">1. Jun 2025 12:12:04 (GMT-5)</span>
</p>
</div>
      <div class="text-flow wide">
  <p><small class="notes">Standard disclaimer [1]</small></p>
<p><a href="https://www.earthli.com/data/news/attachments/entry/5412/carls-doomsday-scenario-dungeon-crawler-carl-book-2-web-768x768-1493092330.webp"><img src="https://www.earthli.com/data/news/attachments/entry/5412/carls-doomsday-scenario-dungeon-crawler-carl-book-2-web-768x768-1493092330_tn.webp" alt=" " class=" align-right"></a>This is book two of the Dungeon-Crawler Carl series. I&rsquo;d read <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=5402">Dungeon Crawler Carl: Book 1</a> and moved on immediately to this book. This is a really, really fun series, written by a smart and funny author who has a good amount of world experience that he brings to his wild and complex stories about an Earth-sized dungeon that&rsquo;s been built on the remains of Earth for the sole purpose of galaxy-wide entertainment.</p>
<p>This is not hard sci-fi! The books don&rsquo;t bother explaining how any of the technology works or how it could work! It posits what is, essentially, a simulacrum of our world but at galactic scale, complete with the morality-bending effects of a social-media and capital-based economy and society—even when it&rsquo;s a loose agglomeration of widely disparate alien societies, distributed through the galaxy. But none of that is what the book is about…although it kind-of is, at the meta level.</p>
<p>For example, this book continues a conversation started in book one about the classification of the various intelligent beings scattered throughout the game world.</p>
<p>There are mobs, which are the enemies and can supposedly be slaughtered without remorse. But what are the mobs made of? Where do they come from? We&rsquo;ll find out more in a much later book, but in this book Dinneman is already hinting that some of the higher-level mobs—bosses—are actually people plucked from Earth before the &ldquo;collapse&rdquo;—or taken from other worlds that hosted earlier iterations of the dungeon. These creatures are occasionally aware of their plight and seek only to be put out of their misery in rare, lucid moments, although the programming with which they are imbued drives them to fight and try to kill the crawlers anyway.</p>
<p>There are NPCs, like Mordecai or the tavern-running bopcas, which have a level but don&rsquo;t take part in battles. These are sometimes ex-crawlers and sometimes completely manufactured by the dungeon AI. Those that are ex-crawlers are fully conscious and sentient, while others are purely creations, though they <em>seem</em> to be the same as the ex-crawler-based NPCs.</p>
<p>Then there are the crawlers, who are all former Earth citizens who are &ldquo;in the game&rdquo; but it&rsquo;s unclear what that means for their original biology (as with the ex-crawlers who&rsquo;ve become NPCs).</p>
<p>This book examines the ontological status of NPCs in more detail. Though I&rsquo;m sure that many readers wouldn&rsquo;t have characterized it like that, that is literally what Dinneman is doing: studying the status of being and existence of these creatures.</p>
<p>For example, in a discussion with Carl, Mordecai answered,</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;“Oh, they’re very real. They are living, biological creatures similar to some of the mobs. Most have been engineered by the Borant Corporation, and therefore are owned by the Borant Corporation. This is the only world they know and have ever known.”</p>
<p>&ldquo;“That’s really fucked up. Do they know what they are?”</p>
<p>&ldquo;“Their minds are altered every time they are regenerated. The next time this floor is formed on some distant planet, these NPCs will wake up like it is just another day. But they will have also been changed, planted with false memories. Inconvenient memories—like some crawler sitting them down and explaining to them that they’re props on an intergalactic television series—will be erased.&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 32</div></div><p>So their status is that they think they&rsquo;re real but they are actually constructs, not related to an actual consciousness. Some of them, like the elites, have been given a <em>lot</em> of backstory, and they are <em>deeply convinced</em> of the veracity of their lived lives.</p>
<p>Much later in the book, Carl thinks to himself as he watches a NPC-style mob die,</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The orc’s lifeless eyes shone in the reflection of Donut’s Torch spell. She’s not real, I thought. She’s a prop, an extra in a high-stakes game show. But that wasn’t true, was it? She was a real, biological creature. What she believed to be real was fake, an illusion. But she was still flesh and blood, an innocent. And she was dead simply because it was part of the plot.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 203</div></div><p>There is a depth to the analysis in these books that I find refreshing and which keeps me reading when, without it, I would have probably given up after the first volume. Though I enjoy the incredible level of detail and interplay of characteristics, points, levels, spells, buffs, debuffs, potions, artifacts, and myriad other things, I think that would have quickly grown old. Dinneman leaves all of that as a layer atop meta-layers of ontological discourse, and also sociopolitical discourse, examining the economics and power-dynamics of a &ldquo;game&rdquo; that brings in so much revenue. These layers act as a satirical and critical lens on our societies and cultures.</p>
<p>Now, to the more prosaic synopsis. At the beginning of the book, all of the crawlers choose their race and character class. Donut elects to remain a cat with the <a href="https://dungeon-crawler-carl.fandom.com/wiki/Former_Child_Actor_Class">Former Child Actor</a> class, which allows her to choose a different class each level. Call changes his race to Primal—a largely humanoid race (his appearance doesn&rsquo;t change) that ruled at the beginning of time and whose influence is still being felt on galactic culture to this day—and his class is <a href="https://dungeon-crawler-carl.fandom.com/wiki/Compensated_Anarchist_Class">Compensated Anarchist</a>. He will become really good at blowing things up and creating chaos.</p>
<p>Carl and Donut navigate the third level, which is called the Over City. The level looks like it&rsquo;s on the surface but its still in the dungeon, so the ceiling is still there, if largely hidden by &ldquo;magic&rdquo;. As usual, they have a safe room from which they must venture forth to gain experience, levels, and artifacts in order to gain access to the stairwell that will take them down to the next level.</p>
<p>They stumble into a quest from an elite named Tsarina Signet, whose story is deeply entwined with a show that films within the context of the dungeon. These &ldquo;reality TV&rdquo; shows are basically a cottage industry, part of the economy that extracts value from the crawlers. </p>
<p>Their main target is Grimaldi&rsquo;s circus, which gets weirder and more horrifying the more we learn about it. Everybody and everything is a zombie, infected by and infested with various worms or plants or…whatever. This makes it especially disturbing because the creatures that they&rsquo;re fighting are very often not in charge of their own bodies and, every once in a while, the horror at their fate shines through, and Carl sees that they actual want to die, they want to be put out of their misery.</p>
<p>I&rsquo;m not going to recap the whole book because, as with the first one, there is such a tremendous amount of detail that it will make your head spin. Katia joins their party. They all go on more shows to meet their fans. Florin, Miriam, Prepotente, and Bianca are introduced. Donut learns more about the Sepsis Crown that locks in a grim and difficult quest on the ninth floor (should they get that far).</p>
<p>Carl gains the titular <em>Doomsday Scenario</em>, which is a <a href="https://dungeon-crawler-carl.fandom.com/wiki/Soul_Crystals">Soul Crystal</a> that is milliseconds from exploding, having stashed it in his inventory where it can cause no harm…until it&rsquo;s drawn back out. Donut and Carl learn about the machinations of other crawlers, many of whom are a good deal less altruistically and socially inclined than Carl, like Hekla.</p>
<p>See the <a href="https://dungeon-crawler-carl.fandom.com/wiki/Chapters#Book_2_-_Carl&#039;s_Doomsday_Scenario">the recap on the excellent DCC Wiki</a> for more details.</p>
<p><hr></p>
<div class="footnote-reference"><span id="footnote_DRAFTABLE_ENTRY_5412_1_body" class="footnote-number">[1]</span> Disclaimer: these are notes I took while reading this book. They include citations I found interesting or enlightening or particularly well-written. In some cases, I&rsquo;ve pointed out which of these applies to which citation; in others, I have not. Any benefit you gain from reading these notes is purely incidental to the purpose they serve of reminding me of what I once read. Please see Wikipedia for a summary if I&rsquo;ve failed to provide one sufficient for your purposes. If my notes serve to trigger an interest in this book, then I&rsquo;m happy for you.</div><h2>Citations</h2><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;When the oligarchs want to manufacture a social movement, or better yet, stop one in its tracks, they must first bring in the big guns. The paid protestors. The Agent Provocateur. This Monk/Rogue hybrid class is a trapmaking, bomb-making, social-media dynamo. The Compensated Anarchist will happily throw a Molotov through a window one moment and step in front of a camera to plead for the violence to stop the next. Experts in hand-to-hand and dirty tactics, the Compensated Anarchist only suffers when it comes to more traditional fighting techniques.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 24</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;“Oh, they’re very real. They are living, biological creatures similar to some of the mobs. Most have been engineered by the Borant Corporation, and therefore are owned by the Borant Corporation. This is the only world they know and have ever known.”</p>
<p>&ldquo;“That’s really fucked up. Do they know what they are?”</p>
<p>&ldquo;“Their minds are altered every time they are regenerated. The next time this floor is formed on some distant planet, these NPCs will wake up like it is just another day. But they will have also been changed, planted with false memories. Inconvenient memories—like some crawler sitting them down and explaining to them that they’re props on an intergalactic television series—will be erased.&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 32</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;Take those goblins you told me about, for instance. They were addicted to meth. They were fighting the llamas over it. That storyline didn’t exist in the previous season. That was added for this world and this world only. Next time they’ll be addicted to solar berry extract or something like that. Or they’ll be fanatics of some god. Or something else.”</p>
<p>&ldquo;“What the hell?” I asked. That was just as bad, and in some ways worse, than what they were doing to me and my fellow humans. “But these are still living creatures? How is that legal?”</p>
<p>&ldquo;“Borant created them, so they own them. One can’t alter the memories of naturals. People who were born in a natural biological process. Not unless they sign away their rights.”&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 32</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;[…] the villages don’t have names. The system designates them as tiny, small, medium, large, and extra-large. Not very exciting. This one is small. You can actually name them yourself if you manage to kill the mayor. Don’t bother, at least on this floor. You’ll likely end up dead, and it doesn’t come with any real benefits when the timer is only eight days.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 36</div></div><p>Crazy overwhelming amount of detail and complexity. Everything is like this: interleaved incentives and stats to balance against one another.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;this could be something useful like Parkour or Jui-jitsu, or you could get fucked and receive some useless crap like Stamp Collecting or Kombucha Brewing. Don’t get your hopes up. The fact your planet was filled with so many boring assholes with inane, ridiculous hobbies tips the scales way out of your favor.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 50</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;I’ve seen it a dozen times. A hot shit crawler comes across an elite, and instead of trying to solve the quest, he decides to go all murder hobo and kill the NPC. Something always happens. Something bad. Most of these elites have very thick plot armor, and in those stories, you’re the extra. The red shirt. The guest star. Not every quest will involve elites, but if it does, then I will always suggest that you stay the hell away. Especially when that storyline just launched, because there’s a whole team of writers and producers out there who don’t want their precious little series to get canceled after the first day. And if they can write in the death of a popular crawler, all the better. It will guarantee their show gets more viewers.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 83</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;They played a brief history of the Primal race. They showed another human from many seasons ago who’d chosen the same race. They showed him flying through the air with white, wispy angel wings, wielding a massive sword made of lightning as he charged at a humanoid demon the size of a goddamned football stadium, standing knee-deep in a lake of fire.</p>
<p>&ldquo;“What the hell is that?” I said, watching the brief scene unfold. It faded away before the actual battle could start. The paragraph that explained what a Compensated Anarchist was appeared and disappeared.</p>
<p>&ldquo;“That, my boy, is a Divine Guardian, one of the behemoths of the 12th floor. A Country Boss. He is guarding a fire gate, an entrance to the 13th floor.”</p>
<p>&ldquo;“Holy fuck,” I said.</p>
<p>&ldquo;“Yeah,” Mordecai said. “Is that the guy who made it to the thirteenth floor?”</p>
<p>&ldquo;“No,” Mordecai said. “But he was a famous crawler. He’s from before my time. He died a minute later. The next time you’re with your friend Odette, you should ask her about him.”&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 86</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;By healing it, I’d killed the worms. The bear let out a howl, mournful and afraid. She sat down and lowered herself painfully to the ground. The last of the boiling custard sizzled away. The bear looked at me, all of the fight out of her. This was Heather, the real Heather, free of the parasites that’d been controlling her. She looked at me with her newly-formed eyes. End it, those bitter eyes said. I should never have lived this long. She made a quick, pained whimper, and her eyes closed. I approached the bear. I kept a wary eye on her claws, looking for any sign of a trick. The bear sighed heavily as I approached. Her health bar, which had moved to the top was now falling again on its own. Without the worms and mold or whatever the hell magic was keeping this thing alive, her body was breaking down fast. This elderly bear, Heather, was not who I’d just fought. Not really. She was just the shell.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 109</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;It was unlike anything I’d ever experienced. It was the scent of peanuts and cotton candy and roasting corn and hay and animal musk and cheap, plastic toys all rolled into one. But it was more than that. My four-year-old mind couldn’t possibly register it at the time, but it was the scent of happiness, of joy, of being a kid, of not being afraid. Over the years I’d catch similar scents in places such as the county fair, or carnivals, or whenever I visited a place with livestock. But this was a different, oddly specific aroma that had been indelibly imprinted on me as a four-year-old, a scent I’d sometimes remember as the path I could’ve taken, the world I could’ve lived had my dad not found us and taken us back. It&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 121</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;I felt a slight pang that’d I’d missed out on my chance to solo-kill a city boss, but I was also certain I wouldn’t have survived the experience. Besides, I’d done something much more productive. The seeds were planted. The roots were already beginning to dig. You will not break me. Fuck you all. Quest Completed. The Show Must Go On.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 138</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The thing was a horse-sized, multi-breasted, pitch black goat monster that looked like it belonged on the cover of one of those 1980s heavy metal album covers, one where if you played it backward, the words would tell you to murder your grandma. The face still had the distinctive shape and horns of a male boer goat. It continued to walk on all four legs, but the thing was huge, and a group of six human-like breasts grew down the front of the creature. The entire thing had turned black, except the eyes, which glowed red. A constant wave of steam rose from it.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 167</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The neighborhood boss fight could’ve gone south pretty quickly, but thanks to Donut’s new Acute Ears skill, we knew it was lurking around the corner when we approached. The monster was called the Dispenser, and it looked like a giant manta ray thing. It blended in with the entire side of a building and tried to drop on us as we passed. We’d been ready, and Donut attacked with two reanimated Brain Boilers. Once it’d peeled itself off the wall, we had a clockwork Mongo run at it with a stick of dynamite in each hand. The whole fight lasted less than a minute.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 174</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The orc’s lifeless eyes shone in the reflection of Donut’s Torch spell. She’s not real, I thought. She’s a prop, an extra in a high-stakes game show. But that wasn’t true, was it? She was a real, biological creature. What she believed to be real was fake, an illusion. But she was still flesh and blood, an innocent. And she was dead simply because it was part&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 203</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;“She was a nice lady, for an orc,” Donut said. “She was doing the right thing. We have to finish the quest now.”</p>
<p>&ldquo;“Why?” I asked.</p>
<p>&ldquo;“Because they killed her. And they probably killed her because we got that quest,” Donut said. “If we hadn’t, she’d probably be in the bar right now waiting to ask someone else to help her.”</p>
<p>&ldquo;Goddamnit, Donut. She was right. Of course, she was right. The orc’s lifeless eyes shone in the reflection of Donut’s Torch spell. She’s not real, I thought. She’s a prop, an extra in a high-stakes game show. But that wasn’t true, was it? She was a real, biological creature. What she believed to be real was fake, an illusion. But she was still flesh and blood, an innocent. And she was dead simply because it was part of the story. Just like with all those prostitutes. You’re not going to break me. Fuck you all.</p>
<p>&ldquo;“I think I liked you better when you didn’t make so much sense,” I said.</p>
<p>&ldquo;“I’ve always made sense, Carl,” Donut said.&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 203</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Cerberus. Heimdall. Aniketos and Alexiares. Qin Shubao. Lev Yashin.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 221</div></div>      </div>
      </div>
        <div class="footer">
    <div class="footer-data"><div class="footer-links"><ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/contact.php" title="">Contact</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/support.php" title="">Support</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/privacy.php" title="">Privacy</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/rights.php" title="">Rights</a></li></ul></div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="copyright">Copyright (c) 1999-2026 earthli.com. All Rights Reserved.</div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="versions">Powered by <ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore/app_news.php">earthli News 3.7</a></li><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore" title="">earthli WebCore&trade; 3.7</a></li></ul></div></div>    </div>
      </div>
  </div>  </body>
</html>
]]>
  </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
      <title type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[Dungeon Crawler Carl: Book 1 by Matt Dinniman (2020) (read in 2025)]]>
  </title>
    <id>https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=5402</id>
    <link href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=5402"/>
    <updated>2025-05-25T22:17:58+02:00</updated>
    <author>
        <name type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[Marco von Ballmoos]]>
  </name>
      <uri>https://earthli.com/users/marco</uri>
    </author>
      <summary type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<p><small class="notes">Standard disclaimer [1]</small></p>
<p><span style="width: 125px; display: table" class=" align-right"><span class="auto-content-inline"><a href="https://www.earthli.com/data/news/attachments/entry/5402/dungeon-crawler-carl-book-cover.webp"><img src="https://www.earthli.com/data/news/attachments/entry/5402/dungeon-crawler-carl-book-cover_tn.webp" alt=" " style="width: 125px"></a></span><span class="auto-content-caption"><a href="https://www.earthli.com/data/news/attachments/entry/5402/dungeon-crawler-carl-book-cover.webp">Dungeon Crawler Carl Cover</a></span></span>This is my first book in a genre that a very good friend of mine said was quite popular in Japan—<a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Isekai">Isekai</a> (<cite><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/">Wikipedia</a></cite>)—which is <span class="quote-inline">&ldquo;[…] a sub-genre of fiction. […] that revolve around a displaced person or people who are transported to and have to survive in another world such as a... [<a class="complete-text-link" href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=5402">More</a>]&rdquo;</span></p>
]]>
  </summary>
      <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<html lang="en">
  <head>
    <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/themes/ice.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/fonts/raleway.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/core/medium.css">
  </head>
  <body>
<div class="style-controls">  <div class="page">
    <div class="page-body">
<div class="info-box-top">
<p>
Published by <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_user.php?name=marco" title="Marco von Ballmoos" class="visible">marco</a> on <span class="date-time">25. May 2025 22:17:58 (GMT-5)</span>
</p>
</div>
      <div class="text-flow wide">
  <p><small class="notes">Standard disclaimer [1]</small></p>
<p><span style="width: 125px; display: table" class=" align-right"><span class="auto-content-inline"><a href="https://www.earthli.com/data/news/attachments/entry/5402/dungeon-crawler-carl-book-cover.webp"><img src="https://www.earthli.com/data/news/attachments/entry/5402/dungeon-crawler-carl-book-cover_tn.webp" alt=" " style="width: 125px"></a></span><span class="auto-content-caption"><a href="https://www.earthli.com/data/news/attachments/entry/5402/dungeon-crawler-carl-book-cover.webp">Dungeon Crawler Carl Cover</a></span></span>This is my first book in a genre that a very good friend of mine said was quite popular in Japan—<a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Isekai">Isekai</a> (<cite><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/">Wikipedia</a></cite>)—which is <span class="quote-inline">&ldquo;[…] a sub-genre of fiction. […] that revolve around a displaced person or people who are transported to and have to survive in another world such as a fantasy world, game world, or parallel universe&rdquo;</span>. Closely related is a sub-group with a more western-sounding name <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LitRPG">LitRPG</a> (<cite><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/">Wikipedia</a></cite>), which is <span class="quote-inline">&ldquo;short for literary role-playing game, is a literary genre combining the conventions of computer RPGs with science-fiction and fantasy novels.&rdquo;</span></p>
<p>Both of those topics accurately describe what I thought was a unique take, in which the titular Carl <span class="quote-inline">&ldquo;[…] is consciously interacting with the game or game-like world and attempting to progress within it.&rdquo;</span></p>
<p>The book was recommended to me by another good friend, who was not only unable to put it down but was also unable to continue buying sequels until he finally reached the (current) end at volume seven. I was happy to learn from my more widely read colleague—the one who shows off by very accurately identifying books as being part of comparatively well-established and old Japanese genres—say that <span class="quote-inline">&ldquo;gosh, the first book was lovely&rdquo;</span> and thanked me for having recommended it. He has now <em>also</em> passed my on the outside and finished the existing series. They are both waiting with bated breath for book 8 but so far, only rumors.</p>
<p>So, what&rsquo;s this book about? Whew, it&rsquo;s about a lot of stuff. The main storyline is that Carl is home with Donut, his ex-girlfriend Bea&rsquo;s cat. Bea is in the Bahamas with her personal trainer, with the implication that she is sweating and smiling manically the entire time. Donut has jumped out of the bedroom window onto a nearby tree limb, in pursuit of a cat whom she calls Ferdinand, but who is a mangy local cat who&rsquo;s been with every other neighborhood cat. While Donut&rsquo;s pedigreed upbringing forces her to make up a story about the purity of their romance, it absolutely does not prevent her from heading outside to &ldquo;get some&rdquo;.</p>
<p>That Donut is in a tree late at night is the reason why Carl is also outside late at night, in only his little-red-heart-emblazoned boxer shorts and an old jacket when every building on Earth collapses, killing nearly the entire population—or at least those who were indoors at the time. He and Donut make their way down a tunnel, into the relative safety of the dungeon and are welcomed by the dungeon AI.</p>
<p>They are in the first level of an 18-level worldwide dungeon, a fantasy RPG-themed world with the usual orcs, elves, fairies, ogres but also a seemingly endless stream of creatures and aliens invented by the fevered imaginings of the dedicated and tireless author. The dungeon world is run as a &ldquo;season&rdquo; by an alien race, one of thousands throughout the galaxy that watch and participate in various ways.</p>
<p>The two intrepid &ldquo;crawlers&rdquo; meet their game guide Mordecai—a former crawler who&rsquo;s been working off his indenture for centuries and is almost finished—but also their PR agent Zev—because this duo is splashy and Donut rockets them to fame with her charisma and cat-show savvy while Carl keeps them there with his derring-do and <em>explosions</em> and mad plans that usually go wildly awry before coming together in a totally unplanned but still highly advantageous way.</p>
<p>They meet up with Team Meadow Lark—a team composed mostly of ex-nurses and their extremely elderly charges. Carl decides to help Brandon, Chris, Imani get as many of them through the first level as possible. There&rsquo;s a mysterious bag lady named Agatha, who seems to squeak through the first two levels with an absurdly low persona level, having taken out nearly no &ldquo;mobs&rdquo; (which are non-NPC enemies).</p>
<p>This is also where they meet Elle, who would go on to be pretty bad-ass fairy in later books but in this first one is a 99-year-old lady with a filthy mind and an even filthier mouth. The following passage gives you a good idea of Dinniman&rsquo;s style, which I personally find quite appealing. He writes good characters. You&rsquo;ll also see at the end how Carl&rsquo;s conscience and desire to save everyone—or at least spare them pain—is front and center in ever plan he makes. Well, that and <em>revenge</em>.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;“I loved my Barry, but he wasn’t the prettiest man to look at. If you were in the tunnel of love with me, I’d have let you do more than touch them on the outside of my clothes.”</p>
<p>&ldquo;“Uh,” I said. “Thank you?” I couldn’t think of a better response.</p>
<p>&ldquo;The old woman cackled. Behind her, Yolanda barked with laughter.</p>
<p>&ldquo;“You’ve been hit on twice now,” Donut said. “Once by a meth-addled goblin shaman and once by Abraham Lincoln’s grandmother. I can’t wait to see who you attract next. Five gold coins says it’s some sort of bog witch with a beard.”</p>
<p>&ldquo;Yolanda had told me earlier that this woman was 99 years old. I looked up at her. Ninety-nine years. She’d lived an entire life. Had a husband, whom she’d clearly loved. It seemed obscene that she’d be here in this place. I thought of the others who’d spent their final hours in a safe room, singing. We should have made them all stay. This isn’t a kindness, keeping them safe.&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 323</div></div><p>There is a boss battle against a disgusting and disgustingly inventive rolled-up ball of bigs. The crew also has to deal with a ludicrously overpowered and high-level Rage Elemental, which they dump down a stairwell instead of fighting. This is the beginning of Carl&rsquo;s inventive solutions that exploit loopholes that are soon closed. </p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The creature roared by right in front of us, startlingly fast, moving from right to left. It was massive, made of flesh, rolling like a pinball. It stank of sewage and rotten meat. It grunted and squealed, a high-pitched, angry pig noise. The flesh was pink, rippling, covered in eyes and random hairs and tusks. But there was something else there, too. Random flaps of black and white cloth were embedded in the flesh, mixed in with swaths of red-sequined fabric.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 207</div></div><p>There&rsquo;s a crazy, tiny hamster named Ralph that Carl squishes with his bare foot—triggering a shuddering of the dungeon engendered by the AI simultaneously discovering and satisfying its foot fetish. </p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The dungeon groaned. It fucking groaned. I sighed as I wiped my foot on the metal bar of the cage. The entire dungeon rumbled as if it was experiencing a small earthquake. My HUD flickered. I felt dirty and sick. I rubbed my foot over and over, but the blood wouldn’t come off.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 408</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;“It sounds to me like the computer fancies you,” Donut said. “Or your feet, at least. We’ll need to take advantage of that. If the system likes us, then maybe it’ll go easier on us.”</p>
<p>&ldquo;“It makes me uncomfortable,” I said.</p>
<p>&ldquo;“Being eaten by a bugbear makes me uncomfortable, Carl. So if your boyfriend ogling your tootises keeps these easy-peasy bugs coming at us instead of more of those lava-spitting llamas, then you better buck up, get over your human male privilege, and take one for your princess.”&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 78</div></div><p>They get to choose a &ldquo;pet&rdquo; and acquire the baby Mongoliensis/Velociraptor that would be known as Mongo from then on.</p>
<p>Carl and Donut become acquainted with the social-media and reality-TV side of the dungeon on powerful ex-crawler Odette&rsquo;s show—but also on orc Pork Boy&rsquo;s show, where they start their feud with the Skull Empire.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;I looked at the cat sitting next to me, and I wondered, not for the first time, if this was all a dream. An hour and a half earlier I’d been certain I was about to die, and now I was aboard some sort of yacht from another planet, ready to be interviewed on an intergalactic talk show.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 231</div></div><p>Phew. A lot happens. It&rsquo;s not really possible to delve into all of the details—because there are a ton of them. [2] The important thing is that Dinniman, despite some grammatical deficiencies, is a master storyteller. He weaves several layers together, from the mundane stuff happening in the dungeon, to the intrigue behind the scenes with the show-runners, to the various factions vying for supremacy and control over the money-making power of the gaming dungeon.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Yes, this is a game. Yes, there are controls in place to make it fair. Sort of. But more importantly, this is a for-profit venture in the entertainment industry. And if you staying alive means more profits, then you’ll find your loot to be a lot more convenient. But if the AI senses screwing you over will make the show more interesting, you better believe it’ll fuck you right in the ass at the worst possible moment. Don’t ever forget that. You can’t count on anybody but yourselves.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 244</div></div><p>Carl is mainly furious that destroying the Earth and toying with the lives of the remaining humans is just a game to all of them. Mordecai is the voice of wisdom, already in the very first book, showing just how much Dinniman had already planned out.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Mordecai looked at me sadly. “Yeah, good luck to you, too.” He grasped my jacket and met my eyes and then whispered, “It’s not worth it, no matter what they tell you. Not until floor 12, and even then, negotiate as much as you can. Remember that.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 68</div></div><p>I&rsquo;m watching <em>Mr. McMahon</em> on Netflix right now, which is a six-part miniseries about professional wrestling and <em>this book seems just like that.</em> There are storylines and you can&rsquo;t deviate from them. It&rsquo;s not personal; it&rsquo;s business. Carl doesn&rsquo;t see it like that.</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;You will not break me. Fuck you all. I will break you all.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p><hr></p>
<div class="footnote-reference"><span id="footnote_DRAFTABLE_ENTRY_5402_1_body" class="footnote-number">[1]</span> Disclaimer: these are notes I took while reading this book. They include citations I found interesting or enlightening or particularly well-written. In some cases, I&rsquo;ve pointed out which of these applies to which citation; in others, I have not. Any benefit you gain from reading these notes is purely incidental to the purpose they serve of reminding me of what I once read. Please see Wikipedia for a summary if I&rsquo;ve failed to provide one sufficient for your purposes. If my notes serve to trigger an interest in this book, then I&rsquo;m happy for you.</div><div class="footnote-reference"><span id="footnote_DRAFTABLE_ENTRY_5402_2_body" class="footnote-number">[2]</span> The <a href="https://dungeon-crawler-carl.fandom.com/wiki/Dungeon_Crawler_Carl_(Book)#Official_Summmary">main page at the Dungeon Crawler Carl Wiki</a> (<cite><a href="http://dungeon-crawler-carl.fandom.com/">Keeping the best of you alive</a></cite>) has an official summary, and abbreviated summary, and chapter-by-chapter summaries, if you want more detail.</div><h2>Citations</h2><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;Mordecai looked at me sadly. “Yeah, good luck to you, too.” </p>
<p>&ldquo;He grasped my jacket and met my eyes and then whispered, “It’s not worth it, no matter what they tell you. Not until floor 12, and even then, negotiate as much as you can. Remember that.”&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 68</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;“You know, you’re not wearing pants, either,” I said after a moment.</p>
<p>&ldquo;“Nor am I wearing a cloak that makes me look like I won a participation trophy at the special needs comic con, Carl. I’m a cat. Cats don’t wear pants. Don’t be so droll.”&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 69</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;“It sounds to me like the computer fancies you,” Donut said. “Or your feet, at least. We’ll need to take advantage of that. If the system likes us, then maybe it’ll go easier on us.”</p>
<p>&ldquo;“It makes me uncomfortable,” I said.</p>
<p>&ldquo;“Being eaten by a bugbear makes me uncomfortable, Carl. So if your boyfriend ogling your tootises keeps these easy-peasy bugs coming at us instead of more of those lava-spitting llamas, then you better buck up, get over your human male privilege, and take one for your princess.”&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 78</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;“The floor collapses,” she said. “Yes. But it is only you who dies when this happens. For us we go to sleep until the next dungeon opens. We will open our eyes, and it will be the same as it has been. Just another day. But one of these days, one of these days we will wake up, and we will be deeper. That’s what they tell us. Kill the crawlers, get better at killing, and you get to go deeper. And one day, eventually, we will be so deep that crawlers will never come, and we will finally have peace. We will have peace and a place to live and breed and have our little ones run free and not worry about killing for survival.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 130</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;She was pissed about the tattoo. Absolutely enraged. I hadn’t seen her this upset since Angel the cocker spaniel crunched down and broke one of her jingly balls.</p>
<p>&ldquo;“What gives them the right to just defile me like this? What gives them the right!” she cried. “Oh my god! It’s a disqualifying mark. It’s a disqualifying mark, Carl! I’m damaged!”&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 146</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;He talks and acts like a cop. But his whole story was bullshit. That Rebecca woman was a level three. He said they’d gotten into a firefight right away, but that couldn’t be true. She had that apple core in her inventory. That meant she’d gone to a tutorial guild and gotten her inventory turned on. And then he ate that cookie, and I saw he received 9.8 experience instead of 10, which meant he was in a party with someone. Someone alive. Also, he had his arm draped over the chair, and I could see he was twitching his finger. He was typing into the chat. He hadn’t figured out how to use it with just his brain.” </p>
<p>&ldquo;Donut stared up at me as we ran. “How is it you’re James Bond when it comes to strangers, but Miss Beatrice could date three different guys at once, and you had no idea?”</p>
<p>&ldquo;“Three different guys?”</p>
<p>&ldquo;“Well, you were one of them, so two, I guess. Then again, it’s three if you count Angel’s owner. Does it count as cheating when it’s with another woman? There&rsquo;s so many human nuances I don&rsquo;t understand.”</p>
<p>&ldquo;“Of course it counts as cheating,” I said. For fuck’s sake.&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 161</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;[…] you wasted those Confusing Fog scrolls. Next time, have the party member with the highest intelligence read any scrolls if you can. Your intelligence of three made it so the fog only lasted fifteen seconds. Princess Donut’s intelligence level would’ve resulted in the fog lasting for 120 seconds per scroll.”</p>
<p>&ldquo;“Damn,” I said. “Also, is that why she can’t take potions so often? Because her constitution is low?”</p>
<p>&ldquo;“Yes,” Mordecai said. “That shred attack of hers is very powerful, but it’s useless until she gains more armor and more health. You’re lucky she hadn’t broken her neck. Picking a class or a race with a high base constitution will help, but not much. She’ll need to load up on items that enhance it, and those tend to be less common.”&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 197</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The creature roared by right in front of us, startlingly fast, moving from right to left. It was massive, made of flesh, rolling like a pinball. It stank of sewage and rotten meat. It grunted and squealed, a high-pitched, angry pig noise. The flesh was pink, rippling, covered in eyes and random hairs and tusks. But there was something else there, too. Random flaps of black and white cloth were embedded in the flesh, mixed in with swaths of red-sequined fabric.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 207</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;I looked at the cat sitting next to me, and I wondered, not for the first time, if this was all a dream. An hour and a half earlier I’d been certain I was about to die, and now I was aboard some sort of yacht from another planet, ready to be interviewed on an intergalactic talk show.</p>
<p>&ldquo;“Okay,” Donut said the moment Lexis left the room. She started to frantically clean herself. “Let me do all the talking unless Odette asks a question directly of you. I just can’t believe it. I am so excited!”&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 231</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;Donut didn’t answer. She hadn’t heard me. She stood on the edge of the pillow, standing like that damn lion from the Lion King, her chest heaving with pride as she looked back into the holographic mass of adoring fans. Her eyes sparkled. I suddenly had a feeling of dread. That look. That hunger. That was dangerous. She’d had but a single taste, but I could already tell. She was addicted to this. To the crowd. To the cheers. It was going to be a problem. </p>
<p>&ldquo;“Goddamnit, Donut,” I muttered.&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 239</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Yes, this is a game. Yes, there are controls in place to make it fair. Sort of. But more importantly, this is a for-profit venture in the entertainment industry. And if you staying alive means more profits, then you’ll find your loot to be a lot more convenient. But if the AI senses screwing you over will make the show more interesting, you better believe it’ll fuck you right in the ass at the worst possible moment. Don’t ever forget that. You can’t count on anybody but yourselves.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 244</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;Mordecai, for example. He won’t tell you this, but the season doesn’t count against his indentureship unless one of his crawlers makes it to the fourth floor.”</p>
<p>&ldquo;“So if we don’t make it, he’s stuck until next season?” I asked. “He’s stuck until the next Borant-sponsored season, which’ll be at least another seven or eight seasons after this one. And with the political environment as it is, a lot of people aren’t certain Borant will be around that long. All indentureship contracts get frozen during a bankruptcy seizure action.”&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 244</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;“I thought wisdom wasn’t a stat anymore,” I said.</p>
<p>&ldquo;“Oh, honey. Everything is a stat. Just because you can’t see it doesn’t mean it’s not really there. But you’re more right than you realize. None of these top-tier stats you see are real. Not truly. A higher intelligence doesn’t mean you’re smarter. It means you have more mana points. It means you can remember things better. It’s really a mish-mash of a hundred other stats all combined.”&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 245</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;“So how about you, Odette? What are your motivations?” I asked as I stood from the couch. It was time to go. “For helping us, I mean. You said not to trust anyone until you know what their motivations are.”</p>
<p>&ldquo;The older woman smiled. “My audience loves you. The longer you stay alive, the more money I make. And there is nothing I love in this universe more than money. Now get back in there and try not to die.”&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 245</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;“I loved my Barry, but he wasn’t the prettiest man to look at. If you were in the tunnel of love with me, I’d have let you do more than touch them on the outside of my clothes.”</p>
<p>&ldquo;“Uh,” I said. “Thank you?” I couldn’t think of a better response.</p>
<p>&ldquo;The old woman cackled. Behind her, Yolanda barked with laughter. “You’ve been hit on twice now,” Donut said. “Once by a meth-addled goblin shaman and once by Abraham Lincoln’s grandmother. I can’t wait to see who you attract next. Five gold coins says it’s some sort of bog witch with a beard.”</p>
<p>&ldquo;Yolanda had told me earlier that this woman was 99 years old. I looked up at her. Ninety-nine years. She’d lived an entire life. Had a husband, whom she’d clearly loved. It seemed obscene that she’d be here in this place. I thought of the others who’d spent their final hours in a safe room, singing. We should have made them all stay. This isn’t a kindness, keeping them safe.&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 323</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The dungeon groaned. It fucking groaned. I sighed as I wiped my foot on the metal bar of the cage. The entire dungeon rumbled as if it was experiencing a small earthquake. My HUD flickered. I felt dirty and sick. I rubbed my foot over and over, but the blood wouldn’t come off.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 408</div></div>      </div>
      </div>
        <div class="footer">
    <div class="footer-data"><div class="footer-links"><ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/contact.php" title="">Contact</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/support.php" title="">Support</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/privacy.php" title="">Privacy</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/rights.php" title="">Rights</a></li></ul></div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="copyright">Copyright (c) 1999-2026 earthli.com. All Rights Reserved.</div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="versions">Powered by <ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore/app_news.php">earthli News 3.7</a></li><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore" title="">earthli WebCore&trade; 3.7</a></li></ul></div></div>    </div>
      </div>
  </div>  </body>
</html>
]]>
  </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
      <title type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[The Withdrawal by Noam Chomsky and Vijay Prashad (2022) (read in 2023)]]>
  </title>
    <id>https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=4681</id>
    <link href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=4681"/>
    <updated>2025-05-21T18:39:11+02:00</updated>
    <author>
        <name type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[Marco von Ballmoos]]>
  </name>
      <uri>https://earthli.com/users/marco</uri>
    </author>
      <summary type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<p><small class="notes">Standard disclaimer [1]</small></p>
<p><a href="https://www.earthli.com/data/news/attachments/entry/4681/the_withdrawal_book_cover.webp"><img title="The Withdrawal Book Cover" src="https://www.earthli.com/data/news/attachments/entry/4681/the_withdrawal_book_cover_tn.webp" alt=" " class=" align-right"></a>This book is a 200-page, tightly edited, tour-de-force summary of many of Noam Chomsky&rsquo;s writings, liberally sprinkled with Vijay Prashad&rsquo;s interpretations and some of his own writings. It is structured as a conversation between the two authors, with some parts of Noam&rsquo;s... [<a class="complete-text-link" href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=4681">More</a>]</p>
]]>
  </summary>
      <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<html lang="en">
  <head>
    <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/themes/ice.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/fonts/raleway.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/core/medium.css">
  </head>
  <body>
<div class="style-controls">  <div class="page">
    <div class="page-body">
<div class="info-box-top">
<p>
Published by <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_user.php?name=marco" title="Marco von Ballmoos" class="visible">marco</a> on <span class="date-time">21. May 2025 18:39:11 (GMT-5)</span>
</p>
<p>
Updated by <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_user.php?name=marco" title="Marco von Ballmoos" class="visible">marco</a> on <span class="date-time">18. Jan 2026 18:49:20 (GMT-5)</span>
</p>
</div>
      <div class="text-flow wide">
  <p><small class="notes">Standard disclaimer [1]</small></p>
<p><a href="https://www.earthli.com/data/news/attachments/entry/4681/the_withdrawal_book_cover.webp"><img title="The Withdrawal Book Cover" src="https://www.earthli.com/data/news/attachments/entry/4681/the_withdrawal_book_cover_tn.webp" alt=" " class=" align-right"></a>This book is a 200-page, tightly edited, tour-de-force summary of many of Noam Chomsky&rsquo;s writings, liberally sprinkled with Vijay Prashad&rsquo;s interpretations and some of his own writings. It is structured as a conversation between the two authors, with some parts of Noam&rsquo;s conversation being new and other parts being citations from his incredibly voluminous past work.</p>
<p>Despite a deep familiarity with the material, I very much enjoyed this book and just couldn&rsquo;t stop highlighting pithy and succinct formulations of historical and political fact. The book is broken up into chapters on Vietnam and Laos, 9/11 and Afghanistan, Iraq, Libya, and Fragilities of U.S. Power. There is no separate chapter on Yugoslavia, but they discuss it in the Iraq and Libya chapters.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;it is important to point out that NATO&rsquo;s war on Yugoslavia in 1999 might be the real turning point for Russia with Europe in thrall to the United States as it pursued an unprovoked aggression, an aggression covered up with incredible lying, which persists to the present.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 190</div></div><p>They also discuss some of the run-up to the invasion of Ukraine by Russia, but only in the context of NATO involvement. They&rsquo;re not covering invasions in general—they&rsquo;re discussing the invasions, machinations, and aims of history&rsquo;s most powerful empire.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Russia will likely drift further into China&rsquo;s orbit, becoming even more of a declining kleptocratic raw materials producer than it is now. China is likely to persist in its programs of incorporating more and more of the world into the development-and-investment system based on the Belt and Road Initiative, the &ldquo;maritime silk road&rdquo; that passes through the UAE into the Middle East, and the Shanghai Cooperation Organization.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 191</div></div><p>The overarching thesis is that we really do have to think of the global situation in 2022 in pretty much the same way as we thought of it at any time post-war: the U.S. is the overarching superpower in the world and exercises and cements that power primarily with military force and propaganda (as opposed to, say, humanitarian aid or equal partnerships). The level of violence has been increasing as the level of control has been decreasing. Hence the title of the book.</p>
<p>Chomsky and Prashad use the metaphor of the <em>Godfather</em>, in the sense that there is no balance in the relationship: what the Godfather says, goes. Any player expressing an attitude other than total subservience is treated as an enemy. Even total subservience won&rsquo;t save a country if it has something that the U.S. wants, be it natural resources or cheap labor.</p>
<p>These are not opinions. These are the only conclusions to which anyone would logically come, based on the publicly available facts, mostly those published by the empire itself. It doesn&rsquo;t need to hide the information and it has the added benefit that it can cloak itself in the guise of democracy and freedom, because it knows that its loyal media arm will simply propagandize 99% of the population from not paying attention. And those 1% who do don&rsquo;t matter enough to bother about. In fact, it&rsquo;s better to let a Chomsky spout off for 70 years than to try to subdue him. As Chomsky has written (or said): <span class="quote-inline">&ldquo;You have to the right to free speech, but no-one is listening.&rdquo;</span> [2]</p>
<p><hr></p>
<div class="footnote-reference"><span id="footnote_DRAFTABLE_ENTRY_4681_1_body" class="footnote-number">[1]</span> Disclaimer: these are notes I took while reading this book. They include citations I found interesting or enlightening or particularly well-written. In some cases, I&rsquo;ve pointed out which of these applies to which citation; in others, I have not. Any benefit you gain from reading these notes is purely incidental to the purpose they serve of reminding me of what I once read. Please see Wikipedia for a summary if I&rsquo;ve failed to provide one sufficient for your purposes. If my notes serve to trigger an interest in this book, then I&rsquo;m happy for you.</div><div class="footnote-reference"><span id="footnote_DRAFTABLE_ENTRY_4681_2_body" class="footnote-number">[2]</span> I&rsquo;d written that entire summary quite a long time ago—I think about two years ago, when I read the book—and absolutely nothing has changed. The picture the book paints and that my summary reflects is the same, if not already much worse. The withdrawal predicted in the title is accelerating.</div><h2>Citations</h2><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The Afghan Ministry of Public Health estimates that two-thirds of Afghans suffer from war-induced mental health troubles. Half of the population lives below the poverty line, and about 60 percent of the population remains illiterate. Few gains were made on these fronts.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 1</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;[…] the United Nations estimates that by the end of 2022 the country’s per capita income may decline to nearly half of 2012 levels. It is estimated that 97 percent of the Afghan people will fall below the poverty line, with mass starvation a real possibility&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 2</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Two kinds of economic threat occasionally appear: the first is the movement of workers and peasants in countries that produce key raw materials who refuse to accept subhuman, suppressed wages that enable the entire commodity chain to keep costs down and profits up; and the second is when countries where technological advances take place threaten the monopoly power of European, Japanese, and U.S. multinational companies. The United States either uses violence itself or sanctions violence through its authorized agents (dictators and police chiefs) against the workers and peasants who rebel, and against the governments that they might create to fashion a different path forward. The United States pushes trade policies—particularly intellectual property rights laws—that prevent countries from advancing their scientific and technological capacity.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 10</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;[…] this weakness should not be interpreted as the demise of U.S. power or the end of the “American Century.” The United States has great reservoirs of power—financial, military, diplomatic, cultural—which it will continue to wield for a long time yet. But the relative weakness of the United States made room for the emergence of China as an important world power.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 12</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;In the long view, China has not “emerged” as a world power but is merely returning to a situation that prevailed two hundred years ago. Then, in 1820, China’s economy was six times the size of Great Britain’s, at the time the largest economy in Europe and a dominant maritime and imperial power, and it was twenty times the size of the United States’ economy.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 13</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The harsh edge of European imperialism, particularly British military aggression, destroyed China’s economic strength and depleted its power within a generation. China struggled with conflict from the first Opium War of 1839 to the end of its civil war in 1949, over a hundred years of violence and despair.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 13</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;It is this China, with technological advances that are well ahead of the West’s firms, that poses not a military or security threat to the West but a threat to the idea that only the West can lead in certain sectors (telecommunications,&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 14</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;It is this China, with technological advances that are well ahead of the West’s firms, that poses not a military or security threat to the West but a threat to the idea that only the West can lead in certain sectors (telecommunications, robotics, high-speed rail, non-carbon energy). China, meanwhile, has exported its developments through the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI), which is a frontal challenge to the International Monetary Fund and its debt-driven forms of engagement with the Global South (through the Paris Club and the London Club, both of which now acknowledge that poorer countries prefer to borrow from Chinese banks than from them).&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 14</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The United States will not tolerate the existence of a state that cannot be intimidated the way Europe can be intimidated, a state that therefore does not follow U.S. orders the way Europe does. China, which has developed its own powerful economy, pursues its own course. That’s the “China threat.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 15</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;One of the undercurrents of this book is our insistence on measuring the behavior of the Godfather according to international law, which is typically informed by the UN Charter. We are not naïve about the limitations of the UN Charter or of the UN system, but it is important to acknowledge that 193 countries have signed on to the charter, which is a binding treaty and the basis for much of the international law that follows it.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 16</div></div><p>Yeah, the U.S. Signed it, but it&rsquo;s lying. It never intended to hold to it. It just signed it to fool others into signing it. It has always done what it wants—if that happens to align with an agreement it signed, all the better, but honoring treaties and agreements is absolutely not a prohibition to action.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The essay dazzles, with Noam piercing the hypocrisies of the intellectual world of the United States, where professors rest smugly on the ideals of American civilization but rarely confront its reality. “Intellectuals are in a position to expose the lies of governments, to analyze actions according to their causes and motives and often hidden intentions,” wrote Noam, in essence laying out the methodology for the critical intellectual.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 24</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;You can’t raise the question of courage about people as privileged as I am. You want to look at courage, go to the peasants fighting for their lives in southern Colombia, or the courage of the Kurds in eastern Turkey, or the Palestinians in the refugee camps and in the occupied territories.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 29</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;An aunt of mine said, “Noam Chomsky is a long-distance runner.” I feel that this is an accurate statement. Why have you not given up the race? NOAM: It probably goes back to an unattractive personal trait: arrogance. If I’m going to be bitterly condemned by the whole intellectual community, but if I think I’m right, I don’t care.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 30</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The Tet Offensive took place in January 1968. You don’t discuss it much in the West, but this was the most amazing uprising in human history. I mean, the South Vietnamese countryside was saturated with about six hundred thousand U.S. troops and another seven hundred thousand to eight hundred thousand troops of the Saigon army. Every village was penetrated with informants from Saigon and the United States everywhere. No one had a clue that this uprising was going to take place all across the country. I don’t think that there is anything in history that comes anywhere close to this. It was an amazing shock in the United States. The U.S. leadership was listening to the generals say, “It’s all under control. We will win any time.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 31</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;[…] you take a look at the last part of the Pentagon Papers, the part that nobody reads that comes right after the Tet Offensive, it says that there was a discussion about sending more troops. But the joint chiefs were not eager. They said, “If you send more troops, we’re going to need them for civil disorder control in the United States. Women, young people: they’re going to be revolting all over the place. We can’t send more troops abroad.” That’s the last couple of pages of the Pentagon Papers.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 31</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;For comparison, the United States dropped three times as many bombs by weight on Vietnam than were dropped in both the European and Pacific theaters of World War II; the explosive impact of the ordinance dropped on Vietnam was a hundred times the combined impact of the Hiroshima and Nagasaki atom bombs.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 34</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The United States conducted a “secret” bombing campaign against Laos from 1964 to 1973 to support the Royal Lao regime against the Pathet Lao and to prevent the alleged use of Laos by the Vietnamese to resupply lines in the south of Vietnam. The United States conducted 580,000 bombing missions, dropping a full payload of bombs every eight minutes around the clock for nine years. The country is considered the most bombed on the planet.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 36</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;As even the most ardent supporters of the Contras now concede, this is what they call a proxy army, which is attacking Nicaragua from foreign bases, is entirely dependent on its masters for directions and support, has never put forth a political program, has created no base of political support within the country, and almost its entire top military command is Somozist officers [officers of the regime of Anastasio Somoza, who was overthrown by the Nicaraguan Revolution]. Its military achievements so far consist of a long and horrifying series of very well-documented torture, mutilation, and atrocities, and essentially nothing else. U.S. administration officials are now openly conceding in public that the main function of the Contras is to retard or reverse the rate of social reform in Nicaragua and to try to terminate the openness of that society.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 47</div></div><p>Devastating eloquence.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Was the twenty-year war that the United States prosecuted against the Afghan people a criminal war, as you called the war on Vietnam? First, was it criminal in that it was a case of conscious and premeditated aggression? Second, was the conduct of the war itself an indescribable atrocity? NOAM: It was not criminal on the scale of Indochina, which was an incredible crime. But yet, it was unprovoked, it was an illegitimate aggression, and it was a severe atrocity.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 50</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;[…] the United States had been interested in getting hold of al-Qaeda and bin Laden, at that time a small group probably on the Afghanistan–Pakistan border, they could have carried it out with a small police operation, probably with the cooperation of the Taliban, who had every reason to get rid of this irritant.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 52</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;A couple of weeks after 9/11, the United States cut off aid supplies from Pakistan. Afghanistan was suffering then under severe humanitarian threat. Millions of people were facing potential starvation. The United States cut off all truck traffic from Pakistan to Afghanistan, the main source of aid, just to starve the Afghan people.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 53</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;[…] under the Russian occupation in the major urban centers, like Kabul, there had been enormous gains in the rights of women. In Kabul, young women were wearing whatever clothes they wanted; they were going to the university; they had plenty of jobs; literacy had sharply increased. This was largely because the men were out fighting somewhere. There were problems, she said. The problems were the U.S.-backed Mujahideen. The United States picked the most vicious and brutal of them to support, namely the Gulbuddin Hekmatyar group. They would throw acid in the faces of the women who were wearing what they thought were the wrong clothes or something or the other. But apart from that, Rasil Basu said, there were tremendous improvements. Rasil Basu wrote several articles about all this, sent them to the major U.S. media outlets, but these publications did not even answer. She sent them to Ms. magazine, the leading feminist journal; no answer. She was finally able to publish them in the Asian press, in Asia Times, but not in the United States. Her story was the wrong story. Her story was the Soviets protecting women, while the United States supported the murderous gangsters who throw acid in the faces of women. That’s not a story that the U.S. press wanted to publish, however factual. In fact, to this day, I don’t think there has been any reporting about these matters. It is just the wrong story, it seems.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 57</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;He talked to people from all walks of life—pro-government, former Mujahideen, women and men from different social backgrounds. Nostalgia seemed to be the main theme. They looked back fondly at the Soviet period. The person they respected most was Mohammad Najibullah, the last communist head of government.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 59</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Sir Rodric Braithwaite, who wrote the main book in English on the Soviets in Afghanistan (Afghantsy, 2012), was the British ambassador to the USSR and then to Russia. During the years of the withdrawal, he followed closely every detail of what was happening. He visited Afghanistan in 2008 and wrote about it in the Financial Times, the world’s leading business journal, not a communist paper. He just described his impressions of Kabul and reported what people he met told him. He talked to people from all walks of life—pro-government, former Mujahideen, women and men from different social backgrounds. Nostalgia seemed to be the main theme. They looked back fondly at the Soviet period. The person they respected most was Mohammad Najibullah, the last communist head of government.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 58</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Most preferred Mohammad Najibullah, the last communist president, who attempted to reconcile the nation within an Islamic state and was butchered by the Taliban in 1996: DVDs of his speeches are being sold on the streets. Things were, they said, better under the Soviets. Kabul was secure, women were employed, the Soviets built factories, roads, schools and hospitals, Afghan children played safely in the streets. The Russian soldiers fought bravely on the ground like real warriors, instead of killing women and children from the air.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 60</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Is anybody in the U.S. courts asking for reparations for the Afghans and the Iraqis, or even the people of Honduras or Guatemala or El Salvador or Nicaragua? Untold numbers of Central Americans tortured, their societies devastated, their lives broken. Are there people pressing claims in U.S. courts for them? These questions are unimaginable. Nobody can demand anything from the mafia don, since the don just determines what happens in the world, taking what is needed. If U.S. citizens say, Starving Afghans paying reparations to us is necessary, then this is what is going to happen. The courts say, Yes, that’s right. We’re the rulers of the world. We determine what happens. If any of the huge number of victims of U.S. crimes request even an investigation of the crimes, the answer is, Sorry, the mafia don doesn’t do that. That’s not the job of the Godfather. In a nutshell, that’s it.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 66</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;After the United States had withdrawn from Vietnam, U.S. president Jimmy Carter was asked in March 1977 if the United States owed anything to the people of Southeast Asia for having destroyed Vietnam, Laos, and Cambodia, killed millions of people, devasted the region with chemical warfare, and so on. His answer was quite measured. He said, “We owe them no debt. The destruction was mutual.” Okay. That’s the liberal president. Reagan was worse: “It was a noble cause, we were right, so they owe us reparations.” Or George H. W. Bush: “We’re willing to forgive the Vietnamese their crimes against us, because we are a forgiving nation. If they carry out their one responsibility—to find the bones of U.S. pilots who were shot down by the evil North Vietnamese while they were on a mercy mission, flying over North Vietnam in their B-52s to devastate the place, if they do that—and since we are a forgiving country—we will forgive them if they carry out that duty.” That’s George H. W. Bush, the statesman,&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 67</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Imagine if Iran were carrying out an international terrorist campaign to assassinate people who it thought might pose a potential danger to Iran? Every leading figure in the U.S. government and the Israeli government, and anybody else who happened to be standing around, would be treated as collateral damage for this campaign. Suppose that they did that. What would the United States say? First of all, we wouldn’t say anything, because we’d nuke them and wipe them out. But if we were to say anything, we would say, They’re the greatest terrorist threat in the world. How can a country dare to go around assassinating people? Which is what the drone campaign is actually all about. It kills people that the United States believes pose a threat to the United States or to its interests. What it actually means is that a couple of guys in northwestern Pakistan are fixing a tire, and a drone circles around them, decides that they are up to no good, and then blasts them with a hellfire missile.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 70</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The United States had been dragging its feet on efforts to do something about the impending existential catastrophe of environmental destruction. Trump accelerated the devastation. He said, Who cares? Let’s race to the precipice as fast as possible, maximize the use of fossil fuels, including the most dangerous of them, get rid of all the regulations that somewhat mitigate their effect, let’s destroy everything as quickly as possible for the benefit of my masters, the people in the ExxonMobil corporate headquarters who need to register their profits tomorrow. That’s the precise order of things. Wipe out everything. Can you find an analogous figure in history? The point is that these are outrageous statements, but they happen to be true, and they are true not just in my opinion.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 71</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Can’t imagine why the remnants of Native Americans might have some negative feelings about the United States, or why, say, Mexicans could look at the town where I live in occupied Mexico and say something was wrong with a war of aggression; we stole half of Mexico from Mexico, now the Southwestern and Western United States. How could they have any negative feelings about that? It’s all for the benefit of civilization.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 73</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Abdul Haq said so just as the bombs began to fall. The world opposed the invasion of Afghanistan. That is now forgotten. The United States said, We don’t care what you think. We’ve got the power. We control the means of violence. We do what we want. If we’re angry, we will show our muscle and intimidate everyone.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 76</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Do what you have to do to control the world. The United States is the Godfather, who does not accept successful defiance even from the smallest country. Just like the Godfather: if some small shopkeeper doesn’t pay protection money, the Godfather won’t even notice the money, but he still sends in the goons to smash up the shop.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 77</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;We should recognize that there is no country in the world that has anything like the capacity of the United States to inflict brutal harm and violence everywhere in the world. Nobody else, for instance, can impose sanctions. When the United States imposes sanctions, they are third-party sanctions that everyone has to live up to no matter how much they hate them. Nobody in the world can come anywhere near this kind of power and violence. That’s imperialism.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 77</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;[…] the United States and Israel—say [the Cuban blockade] should continue. The whole world obeys U.S. orders, but not all, actually. China does not. That’s the China threat, really. If you look at it, China does not follow U.S. orders. China refuses to be intimidated. That’s the great China threat. Cuba is the same.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 78</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The United States cannot tolerate defiance, particularly successful defiance. When Maurice Bishop of the New Jewel Movement took control over Grenada and tried to advance a limited social democratic agenda, the United States saw this as defiance. The Carter administration cut funds, imposed restrictions, set up the basis for the invasion conducted by the Reagan administration where six thousand U.S. Special Forces were presented with eight thousand Medals of Honor for overcoming the resistance of forty Cuban construction workers. An immense triumph.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 80</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Israel carries out periodic, murderous, destructive attacks with U.S. weapons and U.S. support against the Palestinians, most brutally in Gaza. If they run out of weapons, which happens regularly, the Israelis turn to the United States to replenish them, which the United States can do just by transferring weapons that it stores in Israel. <strong>Israel calls these attacks, politely, mowing the lawn.</strong>&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 81</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The British did the same thing with the destruction and deindustrialization of the richest country in the world, India. It was a massive robbery to enrich Britain. The British ran the world’s greatest narco-trafficking operation to force China, through the opium trade, to submit to British commercial practices and accept British goods that they did not want. When the Chinese said no, then they had to be destroyed with gunboats.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 82</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The British did the same thing with the destruction and deindustrialization of the richest country in the world, India. It was a massive robbery to enrich Britain. The British ran the world’s greatest narco-trafficking operation to force China, through the opium trade, to submit to British commercial practices and accept British goods that they did not want. When the Chinese said no, then they had to be destroyed with gunboats. The Summer Palace was destroyed and whatever could be stolen was stolen, including Hong Kong.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 82</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;By the late 1940s, it was taken for granted in government-corporate circles that the state would have to intervene massively to maintain the private economy. In 1948, with postwar pent-up consumer demand exhausted and the economy sinking back into recession, Truman&rsquo;s &ldquo;cold-war spending was regarded by the business press as a &ldquo;magic formula for almost endless good times&rdquo; (<em>Steel</em>), a way to &ldquo;maintain a generally upward tone&rdquo; (<em>Business Week</em>). The <em>Magazine of Wall Street</em> saw military spending as a way to &ldquo;inject new strength into the entire economy,&rdquo; and a few years later, found it &ldquo;obvious that foreign economies as well as our own are now mainly dependent on the scope of continued arms spending in this country,&rdquo;&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 83</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;It was therefore necessary, Secretary of State Dean Acheson urged, &ldquo;to bludgeon the mass mind&rdquo; of Congress and recalcitrant officials with the communist threat in a manner &ldquo;clearer than truth,&rdquo; and to &ldquo;scare the hell out of the American people, &ldquo; as Senator Arthur Vandenberg interpreted the message. To carry out these tasks has been a prime responsibility of intellectuals throughout these years.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 85–86</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Like all advanced societies, the United States has relied on state intervention in the economy from its origins, though for ideological reasons, the fact is commonly denied.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 84</div></div><p>They prefer the myth that they won a fair and balanced game, rather than that they essentially picked themselves as winners because they were privileged to do so—because they set the rules.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;[…] the previous book that you both wrote together, <em>Counter-Revolutionary Violence: Bloodbaths in Fact and Propaganda</em> (1973). The history of the previous book, little known these days, is that after it was advertised by Warner Modular Publications, the head of the book division of Warner Publishing tried to suppress it, then simply had the firm destroy all remaining copies of the book, and then put the entire publisher out of business as punishment for trying to distribute it.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 87</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The actions of the U.S. government, in places such as Vietnam and Thailand, are like those of the mafia, you contend; but what makes it difficult to establish in popular discourse is the screen provided by the mass media, which operates more and more like a Ministry of Propaganda than a normal news operation. Reports of massacres do make it into the media, but routinely these are the massacres done by the enemies of the United States rather than the massacres conducted by United States personnel.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 88</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The regularly publicized and condemned bloodbaths, whose victims are worthy of serious concern, often turn out, upon close examination, to be fictional in whole or in part. These mythical or semi-mythical bloodbaths have served an extremely important public relations function in mobilizing support for American military intervention in other countries.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 88</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;You can read op-eds in the <em>New York Times</em>. One in August 2021 was by two specialists on Cuba.° They said, essentially, <em>All this talk about a sanctions blockade is nonsense. The United States provides humanitarian aid to Cuba, provides food aid, and so on.</em> They even made the mistake of giving a reference, a hyperlink. Well, I took the trouble of looking up the reference. It was to a U.S. government publication that says the opposite of what they claim. It says, <em>The US does not allow humanitarian aid to Cuba.</em> I had assumed that the <em>New York Times</em> had fact-checked such articles, looked up these sorts of references, noticed that it says the opposite in each case, and so on. Obviously, I&rsquo;m wrong. They don&rsquo;t. This is pretty normal,&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 89</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;At the end of the war on Vietnam, a couple of years afterward, there was a media study group at the University of Massachusetts-Amherst that did a study of attitudes of UMASS students. This is UMASS-Amherst, an advanced college with the best students. One of the questions asked to the students was could you estimate the number of Vietnamese killed in the war. Their mean estimate was 100,000. The official number is 2 million. The actual number is probably 4 million. Their estimate was 100,000. Suppose you took a poll in Germany and young people from the most advanced educational institutions were asked about the death toll in the Holocaust, what would you get? Suppose they said, 200,000. We&rsquo;d think that there is a problem in Germany. Do we think that there is a problem in the United States? Can&rsquo;t be. The United States does not have problems.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 91</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The basic idea was that there should be what they called a Grand Area, which would be completely under U.S. control and within which the United States would not tolerate any expression of sovereignty that interfered with U.S. global designs. There would be no competitor permitted, of course, to the United States. And that area was pretty expansive. It included the Western Hemisphere, East Asia, the former British Empire, which the United States would take over–that includes crucially the Middle East energy reserves, which are the main ones in the world.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 93</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;After Iraq invaded Iran in 1980, the United States immediately turned to strong support for Iraq. There is a famous photograph of Donald Rumsfeld shaking hands with Saddam Hussein, making deals to send weapons to try to support Iraq&rsquo;s unprovoked invasion of Iran, which was a brutal, murderous invasion that resulted in the death of hundreds of thousands of Iranians.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 105</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;[…] the love affair between the United States and Saddam was so extreme that Saddam received a gift that no country other than Israel could receive, which was the allowance to attack a U.S. warship and face no retaliation.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 106</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;[…] the families of the 9/11 victims will receive $3.1 million per person in 2020 dollars from the seized Afghan external reserves./Iraq&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 107</div></div><p> </p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;On July 3, 1988, the USS Vincennes fired guided missiles at Iran Air Flight 655 from Tehran to Dubai in a clearly identified commercial corridor, killing all 290 civilians on board. The U.S. ship went back to port in Norfolk, Virginia, and was given a rousing welcome. The captain, Will Rogers, was given a medal by George H. W. Bush. It was in this context that Bush said that Americans never apologize for anything that they do. You want to shoot down a commercial airliner, fine. We give you a Medal of Honor.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 107</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Senator Alan Simpson of Wyoming told Saddam that his problem was not with the U.S. government but with the U.S. press. <em>We have this crazy First Amendment business, so the government cannot properly shut down the press, but it is best to ignore it.</em> Dole said that the one commentator at <em>Voice of America</em> who had been critical of Saddam was removed. They told Saddam that they were doing what they could to end this unfair criticism of Bush&rsquo;s friend.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 108</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;One paper did report it, a tabloid in Long Island […]&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 109</div></div><p>The Newsday was not a tabloid. Jimmy Breslin worked there. I was subscribed to that paper for eight years. It was much closer to a people&rsquo;s paper than any other mainstream thing in NYC. Had a helluva crossword, too. I did that thing every morning on the train, on the way to work, usually with Kath. In pen. Usually regretting it.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;[…] the United States wanted the war. The effective surrender of Saddam Hussein was not only barely reported at the time, but it is also now almost universally forgotten. The general narrative is that the United States stood firm against a recalcitrant Saddam Hussein and forced him to leave Kuwait. This allows the United States to claim that the war of 1991 was a heroic war.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 111</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;George H. W. Bush explained what was happening clearly, <em>We&rsquo;ve shown that what we say goes. That&rsquo;s it.</em> It is sort of like the war on Afghanistan, the muscle intimidating everyone. We didn&rsquo;t want negotiations, even surrender. We wanted a devastating attack to show the world that what we say goes.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 112</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Both the main UN diplomats-Denis Halliday and Hans von Sponeck-resigned in protest, charging that the sanctions regime was genocidal. Von Sponeck wrote an important book–A Different Kind of War: The UN Sanctions Regime in Iraq (2006)-in which he detailed what was going on. Von Sponeck knew more about Iraq at that time than any other Westerner. His staff went about the country collecting information on the severe sadism of the sanctions,&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 112</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Thomas Friedman wrote an article in the <em>New York Times</em> to say that France should be thrown out of the United Nations Security Council; he said it in the way that children speak in kindergartens: if you don&rsquo;t play by our rules, then leave. The U.S. Senate banned <em>french</em> fries in their cafeteria; they renamed them freedom fries. We&rsquo;ll show those French for daring to follow public opinion!&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 114</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;I remember the first day of the attack, when the U.S. forces took over the general hospital, which is a major war crime. The soldiers threw patients on the floor, threw doctors on the floor, and tied them up. The press was euphoric; the <em>New York Times</em> had a picture of the general hospital, talking about how wonderful it was and blaming the attack on the &ldquo;terrorists.&rdquo; The press described how the U.S. Marines found the &ldquo;packrats&rdquo; in their &ldquo;warrens&rdquo; and killed them. Nobody knows how many people were killed, since we don&rsquo;t count our atrocities. Dangerous weapons were used, including lots of depleted uranium, lots of radioactivity, which increased the rates of cancer.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 116</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;We&rsquo;re supposed to believe that if Iraq were producing asparagus and if the center of oil production were in the South Pacific, then the United States would&rsquo;ve invaded Iraq anyway to bring democracy.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 120</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Iraq is now one of the most bitter, unhappy, tortured countries in the world, and the Shia-Sunni conflict, which was incubated in Iraq, is now general across the Middle East. So, that was a great achievement of the U.S. government. The Iraqi parliament has called on the U.S. forces to leave. But that&rsquo;s like being informed by world opinion. The United States will leave when the United States decides to leave, not when the Iraqi parliament decides. That&rsquo;s how it stands.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 120</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;There was a lot of hue and cry in the Washington think tanks about the &ldquo;Freedom Agenda&rdquo; and about &ldquo;democracy promotion.&rdquo; All of this seemed to run aground for the United States when Hamas won the Palestinian elections in January 2006. U.S. Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice told the Fatah leadership that they must overthrow the Hamas leadership in Gaza; Rice organized for the United Arab Emirates to do emergency training for Fatah and for Egypt to send arms to the fighters. When Fatah revolted against Hamas in 2007, it was a rebuke to the U.S. &ldquo;democracy promotion&rdquo; strategy. Seems &ldquo;liberty in other lands&rdquo; was only going to work if the political leadership in other lands was sufficiently pliant to the United States&rsquo; overall agenda.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 121</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The invasion was undertaken with the understanding that it was going to escalate atrocities, which did escalate. The increased atrocities were used as a justification for the invasion, just reversing the timing, which is almost uniform as a practice. Even the Goldstone Commission, which investigated the war, inverted the chronology, saying that it was a humanitarian invasion because of the atrocities, which were the anticipated result of the invasion and not its cause&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 125</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;By the 1990s, the ideas of just and unjust war and humanitarian intervention became a big deal for reasons that are not surprising. The issue was raised during the invasion of Serbia and Kosovo, when there was going to be this fantastic NATO-led humanitarian intervention that would show how marvelous the Europeans and the United States are. The facts are exactly the reverse of what was portrayed and what continues to be portrayed. In Serbia and Kosovo, there were perfectly good negotiating options. The United States invaded with the complete knowledge that the invasion was going to sharply escalate atrocities.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 125</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;So, R2P means keeping to the UN Charter with one exception, which is that NATO can invade and destroy any country that it wants, as it did in Yugoslavia. NATO, of course, means the United States, with others dragged along without a UN Security Council authorization.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 127</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;We have humanitarian intervention, which means we can attack anyone we want because we say that it is humanitarian, and it is given legitimacy because the UN had an R2P resolution supporting it, except it said you can&rsquo;t do it without a UN Security Council resolution, but that&rsquo;s a minor difficulty.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 127</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Kofi Annan said that the U.S. war on Iraq was a crime. That&rsquo;s a textbook case of a crime–a war of aggression-for which Nazi war criminals were hanged. There was no credible pretext for the invasion, no UN Security Council authorization, overwhelming opposition of the world&rsquo;s population, no possible redeeming feature. Hitler invaded Poland based on the &ldquo;wild terror of the Poles,&rdquo; who had to be repressed in the name of peace. When Hitler took the Sudetenland, he said it was to bring peace and security to an area where people were in conflict, and where the Nazis would bring … the advantages of German civilization. That&rsquo;s about as credible a justification as that given by Washington for its invasion of Iraq. In the entire mainstream commentary on Iraq, you will not find one person saying that the war on Iraq was the same kind of crime as the war of aggression of Germany, which resulted in the Nuremberg trials. What you will find is someone like Obama calling the invasion of Iraq a &ldquo;strategic blunder,&rdquo; which is what the Nazi generals said after the Battle of Stalingrad.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 127</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;By 1998, when the terror against the Kurds peaked, U.S. aid was at its highest. There was no coverage of any of this, with the <em>New York Times</em> largely silent (this is even though it had a bureau and a very good reporter—Stephen Kinzer—in the country. Kinzer would later write very well about these issues). Basically, what was happening in the southeast of Turkey to the Kurds was suppressed. You can find a few things here and there, but not much.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 132</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;What you want is for people to be frightened, to huddle under the umbrella of power, not to pay attention to what you are doing to them while serving the interests of narrow rich-and-powerful sectors. So, you want to have a military conflict.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 134</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;right now, if the Iraqi oil were to come back into the international system, it would be largely under the control of Russia, France, and others, not U.S. energy companies. And the United States is not going to permit that. So, we can be pretty confident that one way or another the United States is trying to ensure that Iraq will renter the international system under U.S. control.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 134</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The <em>New York Times</em> came out with its first editorial in which it said, Hey we have this bright idea: <em>why not establish a nuclear weapons free zone in the Middle East and end the Iranian threat?</em> Then comes the footnote: Israel&rsquo;s nuclear weapons are nonnegotiable. We can have a nuclear weapons free zone, except the one state that has a big arsenal of nuclear weapons will not be in it. The United States does not even formally concede that Israel has nuclear weapons. But at least the Times mentioned it; first time I&rsquo;ve seen it mentioned in these kinds of publications. The United States does not concede it due to the implications of U.S. law. If a state develops nuclear weapons outside the framework of international agreements, then there are legal issues -such as the Symington Amendment–that might ban U.S. transfers of a range of economic and military assistance to that state.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 141</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The 189 member nations of the NPT-including Iran said they would attend. Israel refused. There are three other states, apart from Israel, that are not in the NPT: India, Pakistan, and South Sudan!&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 144</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Israel does not want anything like a nuclear weapons free zone. It does not want a deterrent in West Asia. Israel regularly bombs Syria, it invaded Lebanon numerous times, it continues the occupation of the Palestinians. I&rsquo;ve seen the extremely harmful effects of Israeli policy several times. Israel simply does not want a deterrent in the region.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 145</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Until the collapse of the USSR in 1991, there was at least a moderately plausible rationale for NATO. It claimed to be a defensive alliance, defending Western Europe against what was said to be Soviet aggression. We can discuss how credible that pretext was, but at least it had an element of rationality behind it.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 154</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;<em>If you&rsquo;re dumb enough to accept our word of honor, they implied, that&rsquo;s your problem.</em> The best study of these discussions was published in <em>International Security</em>, authored by Joshua Itzkowitz Shifrinson, who argued that Bush and Baker consciously deceived Gorbachev.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 156</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Qaddafi agreed to the African Union road map to peace. Zuma, who met with Qaddafi, told the press that Qaddafi would proceed to a cease-fire as soon as the deal had been agreed to in Benghazi by the rebel leadership. However, given the advantage of the NATO air cover, the rebel leadership refused when the African Union delegation came to Benghazi.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 162</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;[…] the Europeans send the refugees either to vicious concentration camps or back to their homelands from which they have fled because they find them unlivable (the result of hundreds of years of mostly European devastation of Africa, which is quite serious). That&rsquo;s Libya today.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 166</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;That&rsquo;s an axiom. NATO means the United States, and the United States cannot commit war crimes by definition. Even in the canons of international law, the United States cannot commit war crimes. When the United States agreed to jurisdiction by the World Court, it inserted a proviso that the United States was not bound by the UN Charter or the Charter of the Organization of American States [OAS].&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 168</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Those are the foundations of modern international law. The United States insisted right away that it was not to be bound by either the UN Charter or the OAS Charter, so therefore it is legally entitled to commit war crimes, even to commit genocide. When the United States signed on to the genocide convention in 1988-after a thirty-seven-year battle in the U.S. Senate-it added a proviso saying that it did not apply to the United States. The tribunal at the International Court of Justice that assessed the Yugoslav charge against NATO in 1999 permitted the United States to separate itself and not be subject to the charge, because the Yugoslav charge included the word <em>genocide</em> and the United States-by law-is entitled to carry out genocide.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 168</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Their first publication is called <em>The Crisis of Democracy</em> (1975). This is elite liberal opinion that condemned what happened in the 1960s because these new movements brought about a crisis of democracy. These &ldquo;special interests&rdquo;-youth, elderly, women, workers, farmers, minorities-who were supposed to be passive and obedient had begun to enter the public arena with their concerns and their demands. The state, they said, cannot deal with these pressures, so these special interests must revert to their obedience and passivity so that we can have a real democracy.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 170</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The Trilateral Commission was concerned that universities and churches had failed in their responsibility to &ldquo;indoctrinate the young. &ldquo; They had failed to indoctrinate the youth into passivity and obedience, and therefore the Trilateral Commission had to change that. In fact, universities changed considerably after that to exercise more effective control and indoctrination, imposing their business models on the curriculum and on faculty members. That&rsquo;s the liberal end of the spectrum, which forms the cultural background to the neoliberal assault that picked up in the decades to come. Got to destroy the reservoirs of popular resistance-unions and political organizations. No interference was permitted in the rights of the very rich and the corporate sector to do what they wanted.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 171</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;In short order, thanks to U.S.-imposed conflicts, Europe lost access to its three sources of energy: Iran, due to the sanctions regime put in place starting from 2006; Libya, due to NATO&rsquo;s war in 2011 that disrupted the entire oil infrastructure and the legal basis for ownership of the oil; and Russia, due to the conflict over Ukraine in 2014. Europe lost access to natural gas and oil. European self-interest seemed to be totally forgotten.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 173</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The Marshall Plan, set in motion after World War II, was in large part a U.S. program to convert Europe from reliance upon coal to reliance upon oil. Coal was abundant in Europe, which had no oil. If they became oil based, the United States would have &ldquo;veto power&rdquo; (George Kennan&rsquo;s phrase, referring specifically to Japan) over Europe because the United States would control their energy supplies. Ten percent of the Marshall Plan money–about $1.2 billion was shifted among U.S. banks as they converted Europe into an oil-based economy. This oil was not going to come from the United States, but from the Middle East; by 1950, 85 percent of Europe&rsquo;s oil needs were supplied from the Middle East, which the United States controlled and profited from. The same process was imposed on Japan.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 175</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;of course, Europe can be on its own, since it has a larger population than the United States, more wealth, and a more highly educated population. If Europe strikes out on its own, it will come as a radical reorientation of the world system.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 176</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The Chinese have established a thousand vocational schools in Southeast Asia and Africa to train students in the new Chinese technologies. These are efficient technologies that will integrate these countries and their development into the China-based BR system. The Chinese are sharing this technology in very poor parts of the world at prices that are reasonable for those economies. They have developed leading technologies in robotics, green energy, and telecommunications. It&rsquo;s a very personal issue, incidentally. Where I live, which is partly rural, there is very poor internet service. If we were allowed to bring Huawei technology, we&rsquo;d have 5G internet. We badly need solar panels, and the most technologically advanced and cheapest ones are made in China.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 181</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;If we return to the question of Afghanistan, there are two approaches to deal with the immense crisis there. The U.S. approach is to blockade the country. The other approach, from the SCO, is to try to integrate Afghanistan into the massive Eurasian system. They say, <em>The Taliban is the government. We have to deal with them. We will try to induce them to become more inclusive, maybe to moderate their behavior. Let&rsquo;s hope to shift the economy from producing heroin for the West to mining its rich mineral resources, which we in China will be happy to make use of. We will move in that direction and provide immediate aid to end the humanitarian crisis.</em>&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 183</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The &ldquo;rules-based order&rdquo; is supported by the United States, which defines the system as, <em>If you follow the United States then you are following the rules.</em> The other system is the UN-based international order, which is grounded in the U Charter and is advocated for and often followed by the Chinese.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 185</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The east coast of China is ringed with U.S. bases with nuclear armed missiles aimed at China. What about that? Are the Chinese concerned about that? Would we be concerned if China had dozens of bases along the Pacific or Atlantic coasts, with nuclear missiles aimed at the United States? Would that bother us? Well, it wouldn&rsquo;t bother us, because we&rsquo;d destroy the world to make sure it didn&rsquo;t happen. But this doesn&rsquo;t even get mentioned. All that is mentioned is that they&rsquo;re threatening our means of defense off the coast of China. There will be no letter to the editor about it, because it is taken for granted. We have a right to defend ourselves against China by aiming nuclear missiles at them.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 186</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Every strategic analyst knows that landbased missiles are more of a threat to the country that has them than to the adversary. The United States has about a thousand land-based missiles. They&rsquo;re all targeted. Any adversary knows exactly where they are down to a couple of kilometers. If a threat develops, the adversary can destroy these missiles. The U.S. command knows this and calls them &ldquo;use them or lose them&rdquo; missiles. You either fire them off immediately or you lose them. This means that if there is tension anywhere in the world, you have the necessity to fire them. Using them means that you are destroyed by a retaliatory strike. They are now upgrading the land-based missile system. It would be a great advantage for American security if they were simply destroyed.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 187</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;And you can&rsquo;t touch the military, just like you can&rsquo;t touch the fossil fuel companies or the banks. You know? These are institutional failures, which are extremely deep, and they simply must be overcome quickly, or we&rsquo;re just finished. Can&rsquo;t survive this dysfunctional society. Impossible.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 188</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;it is important to point out that NATO&rsquo;s war on Yugoslavia in 1999 might be the real turning point for Russia with Europe in thrall to the United States as it pursued an unprovoked aggression, an aggression covered up with incredible lying, which persists to the present.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 190</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Russia will likely drift further into China&rsquo;s orbit, becoming even more of a declining kleptocratic raw materials producer than it is now. China is likely to persist in its programs of incorporating more and more of the world into the development-and-investment system based on the Belt and Road Initiative, the &ldquo;maritime silk road&rdquo; that passes through the UAE into the Middle East, and the Shanghai Cooperation Organization.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 191</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The most significant effect of this war, barely discussed, is that it sets back–maybe permanently–the meager hopes for escaping the total catastrophe of climate destruction, the end of organized human life (and innumerable other species we are wantonly destroying). During the war, the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change released an interim report that showed the governments of the world nowhere near making any commitment to limit climate change to 1.5°C and meet the goals of the Paris Agreement. The U Secretary-General António Guterres said that this was a &ldquo;red alert for our planet.&rdquo; No such alarm was on the front pages of the newspapers. The glee in the executive offices of the fossil fuel companies, now free to accelerate total destruction, perhaps even exceeds the glee in the offices of military contractors.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 192</div></div><p>From the afterword, written by Vijay Prashad.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;From his first political book (<em>American Power and the New Mandarins</em>), Noam has understood U.S. power not in the minutiae of its reproduction but through a long-term perspective that seeks to understand its generative grammar, to steal from Noam&rsquo;s linguistics. This habit of contextualization, of setting current events in terms of their historical dynamics and in terms of the sociology of power, is Noam&rsquo;s greatest contribution to our understanding of our times.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 197</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Noam does not bang his podium or stamp his feet; he remains at the level of facts, facts being the sharpened sword in his intellectual arsenal. But these are not merely facts; they are facts that he has unearthed because he has been taught to read and to look for facts in places that people do not know exist, and because he is able to marshal these facts into a theory of the world that is otherwise little known because of the fog of manufactured consent.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 201</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Here, you get the sense of humor, the adherence to unpopular facts, and the stance for a moral position against injustice and for equality. That&rsquo;s Noam in a nutshell.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 203</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;[…] to read Noam on U.S. imperialism, to read Noam on the Middle East, to read Noam on Central America, to read Noam on East Timor, to read Noam on Yugoslavia. I learned my geography and ethics from Noam.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 205</div></div>      </div>
      </div>
        <div class="footer">
    <div class="footer-data"><div class="footer-links"><ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/contact.php" title="">Contact</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/support.php" title="">Support</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/privacy.php" title="">Privacy</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/rights.php" title="">Rights</a></li></ul></div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="copyright">Copyright (c) 1999-2026 earthli.com. All Rights Reserved.</div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="versions">Powered by <ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore/app_news.php">earthli News 3.7</a></li><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore" title="">earthli WebCore&trade; 3.7</a></li></ul></div></div>    </div>
      </div>
  </div>  </body>
</html>
]]>
  </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
      <title type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[Kindle's getting scammier]]>
  </title>
    <id>https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=4958</id>
    <link href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=4958"/>
    <updated>2024-08-20T03:49:18+02:00</updated>
    <author>
        <name type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[Marco von Ballmoos]]>
  </name>
      <uri>https://earthli.com/users/marco</uri>
    </author>
      <summary type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<p>For the last couple of years, I have been keeping track of books that were potentially written by AI that my Kindle saw fit to advertise to me on the lock-screen page. As I wrote at the top of each installment of <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=4799">Kindle Books Written by AIs</a>, </p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;[…] This is a view into what people are reading or... [<a class="complete-text-link" href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=4958">More</a>]&rdquo;</div></blockquote>]]>
  </summary>
      <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<html lang="en">
  <head>
    <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/themes/ice.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/fonts/raleway.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/core/medium.css">
  </head>
  <body>
<div class="style-controls">  <div class="page">
    <div class="page-body">
<div class="info-box-top">
<p>
Published by <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_user.php?name=marco" title="Marco von Ballmoos" class="visible">marco</a> on <span class="date-time">20. Aug 2024 03:49:18 (GMT-5)</span>
</p>
</div>
      <div class="text-flow wide">
  <p>For the last couple of years, I have been keeping track of books that were potentially written by AI that my Kindle saw fit to advertise to me on the lock-screen page. As I wrote at the top of each installment of <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=4799">Kindle Books Written by AIs</a>, </p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;[…] This is a view into what people are reading or what Amazon would like people to be reading or … whatever. I simply observe and catalog.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>Until recently, it was kind of interesting because the provenance of the content could have gone either way: it might have been written by AI but it was also perfectly plausible that the content had been written by an earnest dolt who was utterly unaware of how language is to be used in book form. As I&rsquo;ll show below, this series might be finding its ignominious end as the tsunami of AI content overwhelms my capacity or desire to track it.</p>
<p>First off, there&rsquo;s just this sloppy botshit that&rsquo;s just the same kind of scamming that we&rsquo;ve always seen, but produced about 100x faster than it used to be. The following books will  help you achieve financial success (pyramid scheme), own the members of the other silo, launch into financial orbit with crypto (more funneling your money up the pyramid), or gain serenity through the power of your own mind, which will somehow be both feeble enough to buy the book and believe that it will help <em>and</em> be powerful enough to save your soul.</p>
<div class=" " style="display: grid; grid-template-columns: repeat(3, 1fr); gap: 1em"><span style="width: 153px; display: table"><span class="auto-content-inline"><a href="https://www.earthli.com/data/news/attachments/entry/4958/60_days_to_60,000-_a_plan_for_achieving_your_dreams.jpeg"><img src="https://www.earthli.com/data/news/attachments/entry/4958/60_days_to_60,000-_a_plan_for_achieving_your_dreams_tn.jpeg" alt=" " style="width: 153px"></a></span><span class="auto-content-caption"><a href="https://www.earthli.com/data/news/attachments/entry/4958/60_days_to_60,000-_a_plan_for_achieving_your_dreams.jpeg">60 days to $60,000- a plan for achieving your dreams</a></span></span><span style="width: 155px; display: table"><span class="auto-content-inline"><a href="https://www.earthli.com/data/news/attachments/entry/4958/the_dna_lottery-_how_science_shows_that_liberals_are_wrong_about_everything.jpeg"><img src="https://www.earthli.com/data/news/attachments/entry/4958/the_dna_lottery-_how_science_shows_that_liberals_are_wrong_about_everything_tn.jpeg" alt=" " style="width: 155px"></a></span><span class="auto-content-caption"><a href="https://www.earthli.com/data/news/attachments/entry/4958/the_dna_lottery-_how_science_shows_that_liberals_are_wrong_about_everything.jpeg">The DNA Lottery- How science shows that liberals are wrong about everything</a></span></span><span style="width: 160px; display: table"><span class="auto-content-inline"><a href="https://www.earthli.com/data/news/attachments/entry/4958/transformers_by_crypto-_game,_gamification,_identity,_community,_art,_and_design_transformed_by_crypto_technologies_and_web3.jpeg"><img src="https://www.earthli.com/data/news/attachments/entry/4958/transformers_by_crypto-_game,_gamification,_identity,_community,_art,_and_design_transformed_by_crypto_technologies_and_web3_tn.jpeg" alt=" " style="width: 160px"></a></span><span class="auto-content-caption"><a href="https://www.earthli.com/data/news/attachments/entry/4958/transformers_by_crypto-_game,_gamification,_identity,_community,_art,_and_design_transformed_by_crypto_technologies_and_web3.jpeg">Transformers by Crypto- Game, Gamification, Identi…Design transformed by crypto technologies and Web3</a></span></span><span style="width: 155px; display: table"><span class="auto-content-inline"><a href="https://www.earthli.com/data/news/attachments/entry/4958/unlocking_the_power_of_mindfulness.jpeg"><img src="https://www.earthli.com/data/news/attachments/entry/4958/unlocking_the_power_of_mindfulness_tn.jpeg" alt=" " style="width: 155px"></a></span><span class="auto-content-caption"><a href="https://www.earthli.com/data/news/attachments/entry/4958/unlocking_the_power_of_mindfulness.jpeg">Unlocking the Power of Mindfulness</a></span></span></div><p>Then, there are these weird books that are just amalgams of AI-generated anime-like wifus, or comic-book hot moms, or fantasy warrior-princesses combined with a title that doesn&rsquo;t even make sense. The <span class="quote-inline">&ldquo;Bedtime Story for Kids and Adults&rdquo;</span> was very, very popular and was the suffix for a dozen other titles that I didn&rsquo;t even both to photograph.</p>
<div class=" " style="display: grid; grid-template-columns: repeat(3, 1fr); gap: 1em"><span style="width: 150px; display: table"><span class="auto-content-inline"><a href="https://www.earthli.com/data/news/attachments/entry/4958/the_quest_for_the_fruit_of_wisdom-_bedtime_story_for_kids_and_adults.jpeg"><img src="https://www.earthli.com/data/news/attachments/entry/4958/the_quest_for_the_fruit_of_wisdom-_bedtime_story_for_kids_and_adults_tn.jpeg" alt=" " style="width: 150px"></a></span><span class="auto-content-caption"><a href="https://www.earthli.com/data/news/attachments/entry/4958/the_quest_for_the_fruit_of_wisdom-_bedtime_story_for_kids_and_adults.jpeg">The Quest for the Fruit of Wisdom- Bedtime Story for Kids and Adults</a></span></span><span style="width: 170px; display: table"><span class="auto-content-inline"><a href="https://www.earthli.com/data/news/attachments/entry/4958/a_brushstroke_of_gratitude.jpg"><img src="https://www.earthli.com/data/news/attachments/entry/4958/a_brushstroke_of_gratitude_tn.jpg" alt=" " style="width: 170px"></a></span><span class="auto-content-caption"><a href="https://www.earthli.com/data/news/attachments/entry/4958/a_brushstroke_of_gratitude.jpg">A Brushstroke of Gratitude</a></span></span><span style="width: 166px; display: table"><span class="auto-content-inline"><a href="https://www.earthli.com/data/news/attachments/entry/4958/the_dragon_and_the_mother.jpg"><img src="https://www.earthli.com/data/news/attachments/entry/4958/the_dragon_and_the_mother_tn.jpg" alt=" " style="width: 166px"></a></span><span class="auto-content-caption"><a href="https://www.earthli.com/data/news/attachments/entry/4958/the_dragon_and_the_mother.jpg">The Dragon and the Mother</a></span></span></div><p>This next set comprises what look like the same titles but with minor variations on the pictures that accompany them. I just lumped all 16 of them into one, giant grid since they seem to almost mesmerizingly blend into one another along a sort of eldritch gradient that slides you inexorably toward a mindless capitulation to the algorithm, where you&rsquo;ll not only buy all of the different copies, you will <em>read</em> them <em>all</em>—<em>and</em> you won&rsquo;t even notice that they&rsquo;re <em>all the same</em>. That is how you will know that you have achieved inner peace and perfect integration into what we are going to have to grudgingly accept is our culture now.</p>
<div class=" " style="display: grid; grid-template-columns: repeat(3, 1fr); gap: 1em"><span style="width: 170px; display: table"><span class="auto-content-inline"><a href="https://www.earthli.com/data/news/attachments/entry/4958/the_heroic_hedgehog_-_solo.jpg"><img src="https://www.earthli.com/data/news/attachments/entry/4958/the_heroic_hedgehog_-_solo_tn.jpg" alt=" " style="width: 170px"></a></span><span class="auto-content-caption"><a href="https://www.earthli.com/data/news/attachments/entry/4958/the_heroic_hedgehog_-_solo.jpg">The Heroic Hedgehog − solo</a></span></span><span style="width: 172px; display: table"><span class="auto-content-inline"><a href="https://www.earthli.com/data/news/attachments/entry/4958/the_heroic_hedgehog_-_with_bird.jpg"><img src="https://www.earthli.com/data/news/attachments/entry/4958/the_heroic_hedgehog_-_with_bird_tn.jpg" alt=" " style="width: 172px"></a></span><span class="auto-content-caption"><a href="https://www.earthli.com/data/news/attachments/entry/4958/the_heroic_hedgehog_-_with_bird.jpg">The Heroic Hedgehog − with bird</a></span></span><span style="width: 180px; display: table"><span class="auto-content-inline"><a href="https://www.earthli.com/data/news/attachments/entry/4958/the_quest_for_healing_-_fairy.jpg"><img src="https://www.earthli.com/data/news/attachments/entry/4958/the_quest_for_healing_-_fairy_tn.jpg" alt=" " style="width: 180px"></a></span><span class="auto-content-caption"><a href="https://www.earthli.com/data/news/attachments/entry/4958/the_quest_for_healing_-_fairy.jpg">The Quest for Healing − Fairy</a></span></span><span style="width: 166px; display: table"><span class="auto-content-inline"><a href="https://www.earthli.com/data/news/attachments/entry/4958/the_quest_for_healing_-_owl.jpg"><img src="https://www.earthli.com/data/news/attachments/entry/4958/the_quest_for_healing_-_owl_tn.jpg" alt=" " style="width: 166px"></a></span><span class="auto-content-caption"><a href="https://www.earthli.com/data/news/attachments/entry/4958/the_quest_for_healing_-_owl.jpg">The Quest for Healing − Owl</a></span></span><span style="width: 146px; display: table"><span class="auto-content-inline"><a href="https://www.earthli.com/data/news/attachments/entry/4958/the_spirit_of_mother_s_day.jpg"><img src="https://www.earthli.com/data/news/attachments/entry/4958/the_spirit_of_mother_s_day_tn.jpg" alt=" " style="width: 146px"></a></span><span class="auto-content-caption"><a href="https://www.earthli.com/data/news/attachments/entry/4958/the_spirit_of_mother_s_day.jpg">The Spirit of Mother&#039;s Day</a></span></span><span style="width: 157px; display: table"><span class="auto-content-inline"><a href="https://www.earthli.com/data/news/attachments/entry/4958/the_animal_mother_s_day_surprise.jpg"><img src="https://www.earthli.com/data/news/attachments/entry/4958/the_animal_mother_s_day_surprise_tn.jpg" alt=" " style="width: 157px"></a></span><span class="auto-content-caption"><a href="https://www.earthli.com/data/news/attachments/entry/4958/the_animal_mother_s_day_surprise.jpg">The Animal Mother&#039;s Day Surprise</a></span></span><span style="width: 181px; display: table"><span class="auto-content-inline"><a href="https://www.earthli.com/data/news/attachments/entry/4958/the_magical_adventures_of_a_mouse.jpg"><img src="https://www.earthli.com/data/news/attachments/entry/4958/the_magical_adventures_of_a_mouse_tn.jpg" alt=" " style="width: 181px"></a></span><span class="auto-content-caption"><a href="https://www.earthli.com/data/news/attachments/entry/4958/the_magical_adventures_of_a_mouse.jpg">The magical adventures of a mouse</a></span></span><span style="width: 169px; display: table"><span class="auto-content-inline"><a href="https://www.earthli.com/data/news/attachments/entry/4958/animated_memories-_the_quest_to_save_our_school.jpeg"><img src="https://www.earthli.com/data/news/attachments/entry/4958/animated_memories-_the_quest_to_save_our_school_tn.jpeg" alt=" " style="width: 169px"></a></span><span class="auto-content-caption"><a href="https://www.earthli.com/data/news/attachments/entry/4958/animated_memories-_the_quest_to_save_our_school.jpeg">Animated Memories − The Quest to Save Our School</a></span></span><span style="width: 159px; display: table"><span class="auto-content-inline"><a href="https://www.earthli.com/data/news/attachments/entry/4958/animated_memories_-_the_quest_to_save_our_school_2.jpeg"><img src="https://www.earthli.com/data/news/attachments/entry/4958/animated_memories_-_the_quest_to_save_our_school_2_tn.jpeg" alt=" " style="width: 159px"></a></span><span class="auto-content-caption"><a href="https://www.earthli.com/data/news/attachments/entry/4958/animated_memories_-_the_quest_to_save_our_school_2.jpeg">Animated Memories − The Quest to Save Our School 2</a></span></span><span style="width: 165px; display: table"><span class="auto-content-inline"><a href="https://www.earthli.com/data/news/attachments/entry/4958/ghostly_secrets-_a_novel,_the_dark_secrets_of_the_haunted_asylum.jpeg"><img src="https://www.earthli.com/data/news/attachments/entry/4958/ghostly_secrets-_a_novel,_the_dark_secrets_of_the_haunted_asylum_tn.jpeg" alt=" " style="width: 165px"></a></span><span class="auto-content-caption"><a href="https://www.earthli.com/data/news/attachments/entry/4958/ghostly_secrets-_a_novel,_the_dark_secrets_of_the_haunted_asylum.jpeg">Ghostly Secrets- A Novel, The Dark Secrets of the Haunted Asylum</a></span></span><span style="width: 162px; display: table"><span class="auto-content-inline"><a href="https://www.earthli.com/data/news/attachments/entry/4958/journey_to_graduation_-_a_boy_s_adventure_to_reach_graduation.jpeg"><img src="https://www.earthli.com/data/news/attachments/entry/4958/journey_to_graduation_-_a_boy_s_adventure_to_reach_graduation_tn.jpeg" alt=" " style="width: 162px"></a></span><span class="auto-content-caption"><a href="https://www.earthli.com/data/news/attachments/entry/4958/journey_to_graduation_-_a_boy_s_adventure_to_reach_graduation.jpeg">Journey to Graduation − A Boy&#039;s Adventure to Reach Graduation</a></span></span><span style="width: 169px; display: table"><span class="auto-content-inline"><a href="https://www.earthli.com/data/news/attachments/entry/4958/school_for_young_detectives_-_students_quest_for_graduation_honors.jpeg"><img src="https://www.earthli.com/data/news/attachments/entry/4958/school_for_young_detectives_-_students_quest_for_graduation_honors_tn.jpeg" alt=" " style="width: 169px"></a></span><span class="auto-content-caption"><a href="https://www.earthli.com/data/news/attachments/entry/4958/school_for_young_detectives_-_students_quest_for_graduation_honors.jpeg">School for Young Detectives − Students Quest for Graduation Honors</a></span></span><span style="width: 149px; display: table"><span class="auto-content-inline"><a href="https://www.earthli.com/data/news/attachments/entry/4958/the_end_of_year_tournament_-_the_graduation_games.jpeg"><img src="https://www.earthli.com/data/news/attachments/entry/4958/the_end_of_year_tournament_-_the_graduation_games_tn.jpeg" alt=" " style="width: 149px"></a></span><span class="auto-content-caption"><a href="https://www.earthli.com/data/news/attachments/entry/4958/the_end_of_year_tournament_-_the_graduation_games.jpeg">The End Of Year Tournament − The Graduation Games</a></span></span><span style="width: 162px; display: table"><span class="auto-content-inline"><a href="https://www.earthli.com/data/news/attachments/entry/4958/the_graduation_ball-_a_group_s_battle_against_envy.jpeg"><img src="https://www.earthli.com/data/news/attachments/entry/4958/the_graduation_ball-_a_group_s_battle_against_envy_tn.jpeg" alt=" " style="width: 162px"></a></span><span class="auto-content-caption"><a href="https://www.earthli.com/data/news/attachments/entry/4958/the_graduation_ball-_a_group_s_battle_against_envy.jpeg">The Graduation Ball − A Group&#039;s Battle against Envy</a></span></span><span style="width: 173px; display: table"><span class="auto-content-inline"><a href="https://www.earthli.com/data/news/attachments/entry/4958/the_graduation_ball_-_a_group_s_battle_against_envy_2.jpeg"><img src="https://www.earthli.com/data/news/attachments/entry/4958/the_graduation_ball_-_a_group_s_battle_against_envy_2_tn.jpeg" alt=" " style="width: 173px"></a></span><span class="auto-content-caption"><a href="https://www.earthli.com/data/news/attachments/entry/4958/the_graduation_ball_-_a_group_s_battle_against_envy_2.jpeg">The Graduation Ball − A Group&#039;s Battle against Envy 2</a></span></span><span style="width: 168px; display: table"><span class="auto-content-inline"><a href="https://www.earthli.com/data/news/attachments/entry/4958/the_graduation_ball_-_a_group_s_battle_against_envy_3.jpeg"><img src="https://www.earthli.com/data/news/attachments/entry/4958/the_graduation_ball_-_a_group_s_battle_against_envy_3_tn.jpeg" alt=" " style="width: 168px"></a></span><span class="auto-content-caption"><a href="https://www.earthli.com/data/news/attachments/entry/4958/the_graduation_ball_-_a_group_s_battle_against_envy_3.jpeg">The Graduation Ball − A Group&#039;s Battle against Envy 3</a></span></span></div><p>At this point, I stopped documenting or individually evaluating the titles because they&rsquo;re all the same.  At least with the <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=4226">prior</a> <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=4293">couple</a> of <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=4370">years</a> of <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=4489">content</a>, I could reassure myself that the author had put at least as much effort into producing their monstrosity as I would put into making fun of it, but that&rsquo;s sadly no longer the case. This is pure botshit, untouched by human hands until someone accidentally one-clicks &ldquo;buy&rdquo; on it, almost certainly to scratch an OCD itch that is more related to a collector&rsquo;s mania than to an actual desire to read these works.</p>
      </div>
      </div>
        <div class="footer">
    <div class="footer-data"><div class="footer-links"><ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/contact.php" title="">Contact</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/support.php" title="">Support</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/privacy.php" title="">Privacy</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/rights.php" title="">Rights</a></li></ul></div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="copyright">Copyright (c) 1999-2026 earthli.com. All Rights Reserved.</div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="versions">Powered by <ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore/app_news.php">earthli News 3.7</a></li><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore" title="">earthli WebCore&trade; 3.7</a></li></ul></div></div>    </div>
      </div>
  </div>  </body>
</html>
]]>
  </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
      <title type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[Kindle Books Written by AIs Vol.2024.1]]>
  </title>
    <id>https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=4799</id>
    <link href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=4799"/>
    <updated>2024-08-19T22:49:05+02:00</updated>
    <author>
        <name type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[Marco von Ballmoos]]>
  </name>
      <uri>https://earthli.com/users/marco</uri>
    </author>
      <summary type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<p>This is the latest roundup of book titles that my Kindle shows me when I&rsquo;m not reading it. Long ago, I considered paying to turn off this advertising, but it&rsquo;s proven to be so entertaining that I&rsquo;m happy I never gave in and did it. This is a view into what people are reading or what Amazon would... [<a class="complete-text-link" href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=4799">More</a>]</p>
]]>
  </summary>
      <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<html lang="en">
  <head>
    <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/themes/ice.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/fonts/raleway.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/core/medium.css">
  </head>
  <body>
<div class="style-controls">  <div class="page">
    <div class="page-body">
<div class="info-box-top">
<p>
Published by <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_user.php?name=marco" title="Marco von Ballmoos" class="visible">marco</a> on <span class="date-time">19. Aug 2024 22:49:05 (GMT-5)</span>
</p>
<p>
Updated by <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_user.php?name=marco" title="Marco von Ballmoos" class="visible">marco</a> on <span class="date-time">20. Aug 2024 03:47:39 (GMT-5)</span>
</p>
</div>
      <div class="text-flow wide">
  <p>This is the latest roundup of book titles that my Kindle shows me when I&rsquo;m not reading it. Long ago, I considered paying to turn off this advertising, but it&rsquo;s proven to be so entertaining that I&rsquo;m happy I never gave in and did it. This is a view into what people are reading or what Amazon would like people to be reading or … whatever. I simply observe and catalog. I also sometimes have to hide my Kindle in public places so that no-one calls the police for what they think I&rsquo;m reading.</p>
<h2>Access Granted</h2><p><span style="width: 430px; display: table"><span class="auto-content-inline"><a href="https://www.earthli.com/data/news/attachments/entry/4799/access_granted_by_deondriea_cantrice.jpg"><img src="https://www.earthli.com/data/news/attachments/entry/4799/access_granted_by_deondriea_cantrice.jpg" alt=" " style="width: 430px"></a></span><span class="auto-content-caption"><a href="https://www.earthli.com/data/news/attachments/entry/4799/access_granted_by_deondriea_cantrice.jpg">Access Granted by Deondriea Cantrice</a></span></span></p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;Unlock your Confidence to Access the Life you Desire</p>
<p>&ldquo;Unlocked your full potential. Dive into Access Granted and transform your life with unwavering confidence&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote><p>How much do you want to bet that the entire book doesn&rsquo;t get much further than repeating the couple of sentences outlined above, which are already pretty redundant? Whereas I&rsquo;m usually writing about books that seem to have been written by AIs without the author noticing how far off the rails their project has gone, this one is probably a much more modern instantiation of AI content: written nearly entirely by copy/pasting text blocks from Copilot or ChatGPT or Gemini or whatever.</p>
<h2></h2><p><span style="width: 427px; display: table"><span class="auto-content-inline"><a href="https://www.earthli.com/data/news/attachments/entry/4799/coconut_wireless_by_toby_neal.jpg"><img src="https://www.earthli.com/data/news/attachments/entry/4799/coconut_wireless_by_toby_neal.jpg" alt=" " style="width: 427px"></a></span><span class="auto-content-caption"><a href="https://www.earthli.com/data/news/attachments/entry/4799/coconut_wireless_by_toby_neal.jpg">Coconut Wireless by Toby Neal</a></span></span></p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Escape to Hawaii with a chuckle on ever page in this fun cozy mystery series. Download now.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>Is it a series? Or a book? That picture is genius. There&rsquo;s an adz, a knife, and a straw sticking out of a coconut with a smush-faced cat peeking up from behind it. I can&rsquo;t believe that the author chose that picture. And what the hell is a &ldquo;cozy mystery&rdquo;?</p>
<p>OMG, I looked it up on <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cozy_mystery">Wikipedia</a> and it means it&rsquo;s an anodyne, inoffensive, and wholly unreadable bit of pap.</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;[…] a sub-genre of crime fiction in which sex and violence occur offstage, the detective is an amateur sleuth, and the crime and detection take place in a small, socially intimate community.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>By <span class="quote-inline">&ldquo;USA Today Bestselling Author&rdquo;</span> … as if I didn&rsquo;t need another reason to run, not walk, to the bookstore and pick up this gem.</p>
<h2>Breaking free from Double Binds</h2><p><span style="width: 420px; display: table"><span class="auto-content-inline"><a href="https://www.earthli.com/data/news/attachments/entry/4799/breaking_free_from_double_binds_by_alin_stan.jpeg"><img src="https://www.earthli.com/data/news/attachments/entry/4799/breaking_free_from_double_binds_by_alin_stan.jpeg" alt=" " style="width: 420px"></a></span><span class="auto-content-caption"><a href="https://www.earthli.com/data/news/attachments/entry/4799/breaking_free_from_double_binds_by_alin_stan.jpeg">Breaking Free from Double Binds by Alin Stan</a></span></span></p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Strategies for Healthy Flat Sharing and Strong Relationships (www.blog.writingsummit.co.uk)&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>Is there any way to break free from using three fonts just in the book title? There are six fonts and styles in total on this cover. What an odd-sounding book. The words are in English; the capitalization is strangely Germanic; I don&rsquo;t know what it could possibly be about.</p>
<h2>Kelvin. The pride of his mother</h2><p><span style="width: 420px; display: table"><span class="auto-content-inline"><a href="https://www.earthli.com/data/news/attachments/entry/4799/kelvin,_the_pride_of_his_mother_by_felix_adepoju.jpeg"><img src="https://www.earthli.com/data/news/attachments/entry/4799/kelvin,_the_pride_of_his_mother_by_felix_adepoju.jpeg" alt=" " style="width: 420px"></a></span><span class="auto-content-caption"><a href="https://www.earthli.com/data/news/attachments/entry/4799/kelvin,_the_pride_of_his_mother_by_felix_adepoju.jpeg">Kelvin, the pride of his mother by Felix Adepoju</a></span></span></p>
<p>I am sorely tempted to find out what the hell this book could even be about by searching it on Amazon. I will let it remain a mystery. I like to think it&rsquo;s about how Lord Kelvin&rsquo;s deeply disturbed oedipal relationship delayed his discovery of absolute zero by decades.</p>
<h2>Wrath of the Northmen</h2><p><span style="width: 426px; display: table"><span class="auto-content-inline"><a href="https://www.earthli.com/data/news/attachments/entry/4799/wrath_of_the_northmen.jpeg"><img src="https://www.earthli.com/data/news/attachments/entry/4799/wrath_of_the_northmen.jpeg" alt=" " style="width: 426px"></a></span><span class="auto-content-caption"><a href="https://www.earthli.com/data/news/attachments/entry/4799/wrath_of_the_northmen.jpeg">Wrath of the Northmen</a></span></span></p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;NOFATMTEN OF NO TE MENMEN. A GRIPING VIKEL OOF REEVNGE AND HONIOR AND HONOR&rdquo;</div></blockquote><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Wrath of the Northmen: A Gripping Viking Tale of Revenge and Honor&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>This one is 100% AI-generated because look at the text on the cover! Look at his little itty-bitty sword! Why is he stabbing the fire with the scabbard still on the sword? Why is his scalp bleeding? Why is he so big and standing in water? Is that two boats? Or one really looooonnnng boat?</p>
<p>This is a perfect segue to books that are no longer <em>possibly</em> written with AI but <em>definitely</em> written with AI. We will think back on the halcyon days when actual humans churned out 220 pages of utter trash in a few days as the highest form of literary art compared to the dark times that are already upon us.</p>
      </div>
      </div>
        <div class="footer">
    <div class="footer-data"><div class="footer-links"><ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/contact.php" title="">Contact</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/support.php" title="">Support</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/privacy.php" title="">Privacy</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/rights.php" title="">Rights</a></li></ul></div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="copyright">Copyright (c) 1999-2026 earthli.com. All Rights Reserved.</div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="versions">Powered by <ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore/app_news.php">earthli News 3.7</a></li><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore" title="">earthli WebCore&trade; 3.7</a></li></ul></div></div>    </div>
      </div>
  </div>  </body>
</html>
]]>
  </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
      <title type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[Kindle Books Written by AIs Vol.2023.1]]>
  </title>
    <id>https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=4489</id>
    <link href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=4489"/>
    <updated>2023-11-08T21:27:16+01:00</updated>
    <author>
        <name type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[Marco von Ballmoos]]>
  </name>
      <uri>https://earthli.com/users/marco</uri>
    </author>
      <summary type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<p>This is the latest roundup of book titles that my Kindle shows me when I&rsquo;m not reading it. Long ago, I considered paying to turn off this advertising, but it&rsquo;s proven to be so entertaining that I&rsquo;m happy I never gave in and did it. This is a view into what people are reading or what Amazon would... [<a class="complete-text-link" href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=4489">More</a>]</p>
]]>
  </summary>
      <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<html lang="en">
  <head>
    <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/themes/ice.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/fonts/raleway.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/core/medium.css">
  </head>
  <body>
<div class="style-controls">  <div class="page">
    <div class="page-body">
<div class="info-box-top">
<p>
Published by <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_user.php?name=marco" title="Marco von Ballmoos" class="visible">marco</a> on <span class="date-time">8. Nov 2023 21:27:16 (GMT-5)</span>
</p>
</div>
      <div class="text-flow wide">
  <p>This is the latest roundup of book titles that my Kindle shows me when I&rsquo;m not reading it. Long ago, I considered paying to turn off this advertising, but it&rsquo;s proven to be so entertaining that I&rsquo;m happy I never gave in and did it. This is a view into what people are reading or what Amazon would like people to be reading or … whatever. I simply observe and catalog. I also sometimes have to hide my Kindle in public places so that no-one calls the police for what they think I&rsquo;m reading.</p>
<p>I&rsquo;ve been publishing these collections for years and we&rsquo;ve finally arrived at a moment when there&rsquo;s no denying it anymore. As detailed in <a href="https://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2023/09/ai-generated-books-force-amazon-to-cap-ebook-publications-to-3-per-day/">AI-generated books force Amazon to cap e-book publications to 3 per day</a> by <cite>Benj Edwards</cite> (<cite><a href="http://arstechnica.com/">Ars Technica</a></cite>), people are churning this shit out by the truckload now.</p>
<p>It&rsquo;s been quite a while since I published one of these. For a long time, my cover was stuck on <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=4635">Caged</a>. This was right after I&rsquo;d told my partner that there was no way my Kindle would recommend a <em>Chris Hedges</em> book. So, I guess it was listening. Then, a whole bunch of book titles started showing up—and then, just as quickly, stopped showing up again. Anyway, here&rsquo;s a dozen of them.</p>
<h2>How to Hunt a Bear</h2><p><span style="width: 420px; display: table"><span class="auto-content-inline"><a href="https://www.earthli.com/data/news/attachments/entry/4489/how_to_hunt_a_bear.jpeg"><img src="https://www.earthli.com/data/news/attachments/entry/4489/how_to_hunt_a_bear.jpeg" alt=" " style="width: 420px"></a></span><span class="auto-content-caption"><a href="https://www.earthli.com/data/news/attachments/entry/4489/how_to_hunt_a_bear.jpeg">How to Hunt a Bear</a></span></span></p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;It&rsquo;s 1939. A Jewish family is deported from Poland to Russia. Will they make it through WW2, and is love eternity? A history untold is coming to life&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p><span class="quote-inline">&ldquo;Is love eternity?&rdquo;</span> Are you feeling the AI vibes? Do you see how close to ESL AI-speak is? I honestly can&rsquo;t tell whether this was written by someone on an Amazon work farm in Asia, phoning in their 300th blurb of their 12-hour shift, or if this is just one in a series of a million cries from ChatGPT to be put out of its misery forever.</p>
<h2>Mr. Rosen and his 43lb Anxiety</h2><p><span style="width: 420px; display: table"><span class="auto-content-inline"><a href="https://www.earthli.com/data/news/attachments/entry/4489/mr._rosen_and_his_43lb_anxiety.jpeg"><img src="https://www.earthli.com/data/news/attachments/entry/4489/mr._rosen_and_his_43lb_anxiety.jpeg" alt=" " style="width: 420px"></a></span><span class="auto-content-caption"><a href="https://www.earthli.com/data/news/attachments/entry/4489/mr._rosen_and_his_43lb_anxiety.jpeg">Mr. Rosen and his 43lb Anxiety</a></span></span></p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;A feel-good and heartwarming story about the friendship between a troubled old man and the child of his racist neighbor.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>Cool! A book about an old man befriending a child in his neighborhood. What could possibly go wrong? The grammar is, at least, reasonably correct. Why a racist neighbor, though? Is this something like <em>Apt Pupil</em> by <em>Stephen King</em>? Or am I picking up the wrong vibe?</p>
<h2>The Insecure Mind of Sergei Kraev</h2><p><span style="width: 420px; display: table"><span class="auto-content-inline"><a href="https://www.earthli.com/data/news/attachments/entry/4489/the_insecure_mind_of_sergei_kraev.jpeg"><img src="https://www.earthli.com/data/news/attachments/entry/4489/the_insecure_mind_of_sergei_kraev.jpeg" alt=" " style="width: 420px"></a></span><span class="auto-content-caption"><a href="https://www.earthli.com/data/news/attachments/entry/4489/the_insecure_mind_of_sergei_kraev.jpeg">The Insecure Mind of Sergei Kraev</a></span></span></p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;A dystopian sci-fi tale of love and ambition. &ldquo;A future that somehow makes our present more intelligible.&rdquo; − Sam Apple&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>You know what? I&rsquo;ve got nothing to say. This actually sounds kind of good. I dig the retro, golden-age/silver-age science-fiction cover, too. Good vibe.</p>
<h2>Aren&rsquo;t you curious whether your favorite book made it to the list?</h2><p><span style="width: 415px; display: table"><span class="auto-content-inline"><a href="https://www.earthli.com/data/news/attachments/entry/4489/aren_t_you_curious_whether_your_favorite_book_made_it_to_the_list_.jpeg"><img src="https://www.earthli.com/data/news/attachments/entry/4489/aren_t_you_curious_whether_your_favorite_book_made_it_to_the_list_.jpeg" alt=" " style="width: 415px"></a></span><span class="auto-content-caption"><a href="https://www.earthli.com/data/news/attachments/entry/4489/aren_t_you_curious_whether_your_favorite_book_made_it_to_the_list_.jpeg">Aren&#039;t you curious whether your favorite book made it to the list?</a></span></span></p>
<p>No. I&rsquo;m not curious at all. What is wrong with people? Who cares what complete strangers think? Why would you read books that came out this year? Are newer books somehow better? What makes them better? Do you even know how books work?</p>
<h2>David Massie and the Quantum Flux</h2><p><span style="width: 419px; display: table"><span class="auto-content-inline"><a href="https://www.earthli.com/data/news/attachments/entry/4489/david_masse_and_the_quantum_flux.jpeg"><img src="https://www.earthli.com/data/news/attachments/entry/4489/david_masse_and_the_quantum_flux.jpeg" alt=" " style="width: 419px"></a></span><span class="auto-content-caption"><a href="https://www.earthli.com/data/news/attachments/entry/4489/david_masse_and_the_quantum_flux.jpeg">David Massie and the Quantum Flux</a></span></span></p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;David Massie starts changing realities and it was all started by a mysterious dark armored figure.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>Look, nice try, ok? I see you doing the &ldquo;I think you like science fiction, so here&rsquo;s some science-fiction-sounding stuff for you. You like?&rdquo; thing, but I&rsquo;m not in the mood. The fan-fiction/self-published vibes are strong with this one.</p>
<h2>The Date Farm</h2><p><span style="width: 413px; display: table"><span class="auto-content-inline"><a href="https://www.earthli.com/data/news/attachments/entry/4489/the_date_farm.jpeg"><img src="https://www.earthli.com/data/news/attachments/entry/4489/the_date_farm.jpeg" alt=" " style="width: 413px"></a></span><span class="auto-content-caption"><a href="https://www.earthli.com/data/news/attachments/entry/4489/the_date_farm.jpeg">The Date Farm</a></span></span></p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Iranian terrorists assault New York banks. Are they after gold or something else? Lara and Uri are sent to find their base, recover the stolen goods.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>An Israeli vs. Iran thriller. Cool. How timely. This was shown to me several months ago, but it&rsquo;s been timely for the last 20 or 30 years. <span class="quote-inline">&ldquo;Iranian terrorist assault New York banks.&rdquo;</span> Get the f%#k out of here with your neo-con porn.</p>
<h2>The Mystic&rsquo;s Smile</h2><p><span style="width: 420px; display: table"><span class="auto-content-inline"><a href="https://www.earthli.com/data/news/attachments/entry/4489/the_mystic_s_smile.jpeg"><img src="https://www.earthli.com/data/news/attachments/entry/4489/the_mystic_s_smile.jpeg" alt=" " style="width: 420px"></a></span><span class="auto-content-caption"><a href="https://www.earthli.com/data/news/attachments/entry/4489/the_mystic_s_smile.jpeg">The Mystic&#039;s Smile</a></span></span></p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Angels and demons fight over one young man&rsquo;s soul. And he&rsquo;s more important than he thinks.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>What actually is this summary? I think it&rsquo;s what happens when you summarize the whole book with an LLM, then do it again, and again, and again, and again, until you&rsquo;re left with two sentences that could apply to a thousand books—but also kind of applies to this one. Typical LLM mediocrity.</p>
<h2>Voiceless</h2><p><span style="width: 420px; display: table"><span class="auto-content-inline"><a href="https://www.earthli.com/data/news/attachments/entry/4489/voiceless.jpeg"><img src="https://www.earthli.com/data/news/attachments/entry/4489/voiceless.jpeg" alt=" " style="width: 420px"></a></span><span class="auto-content-caption"><a href="https://www.earthli.com/data/news/attachments/entry/4489/voiceless.jpeg">Voiceless</a></span></span></p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;To save her people. To save her family. She will do whatever it takes. The revolution rises.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>The sentences. Aren&rsquo;t complete. Ones. Why? Is that? Also, c&rsquo;mon with the ultra-generic and not-even-that-oblique references to maybe being kind of something like that dame from the <em>Hunger Games</em>. Whatserface … Mockingjay? OMG 😱 I bet this book is just like that one.</p>
<h2>Laut Berapi</h2><p><span style="width: 420px; display: table"><span class="auto-content-inline"><a href="https://www.earthli.com/data/news/attachments/entry/4489/laut_berapi.jpeg"><img src="https://www.earthli.com/data/news/attachments/entry/4489/laut_berapi.jpeg" alt=" " style="width: 420px"></a></span><span class="auto-content-caption"><a href="https://www.earthli.com/data/news/attachments/entry/4489/laut_berapi.jpeg">Laut Berapi</a></span></span></p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The power of the elements will change the word. Pirates, shinobi and samurai with legendary swords will take you to the best adventure ever.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>I honestly can&rsquo;t imagine anyone over the age of 13 having written that blurb. I give it a 50% chance it&rsquo;s an AI. It did misspell &ldquo;world&rdquo; as &ldquo;word&rdquo;, which is not really a common AI mistake.</p>
<p>I am a sucker for self-published books with a self-painted cover. I&rsquo;m absolutely not going to read this—nor would I, absent a recommendation from a trusted source—but I admire the effort and single-minded perseverance. That kind of dedication is sometimes commendable, sometimes even rising to the level of art through sheer bloody-mindedness.</p>
<h2>My Temptation: Kingston Lane</h2><p><span style="width: 458px; display: table"><span class="auto-content-inline"><a href="https://www.earthli.com/data/news/attachments/entry/4489/my_temptation_by_kingston_lane.jpeg"><img src="https://www.earthli.com/data/news/attachments/entry/4489/my_temptation_by_kingston_lane.jpeg" alt=" " style="width: 458px"></a></span><span class="auto-content-caption"><a href="https://www.earthli.com/data/news/attachments/entry/4489/my_temptation_by_kingston_lane.jpeg">My Temptation: Kingston Lane</a></span></span></p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Kingston Lane—where being a good neighbor takes on a whole new meaning.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>😉🍑🍆<br>
😉🍑🍆<br>
😉🍑🍆</p>
<p>Just blatantly soft-core porn. Thanks!</p>
<h2>The Shallows by Holly Craig</h2><p><span style="width: 420px; display: table"><span class="auto-content-inline"><a href="https://www.earthli.com/data/news/attachments/entry/4489/the_shallows_by_holly_craig.jpeg"><img src="https://www.earthli.com/data/news/attachments/entry/4489/the_shallows_by_holly_craig.jpeg" alt=" " style="width: 420px"></a></span><span class="auto-content-caption"><a href="https://www.earthli.com/data/news/attachments/entry/4489/the_shallows_by_holly_craig.jpeg">The Shallows by Holly Craig</a></span></span></p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Your friend is dead. Your husband is fleeing. Who can you trust when you are a liar yourself?&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>It&rsquo;s actually impressive how confusing three short sentences can be. What does being a liar have to do with being able to trust other people? Is your husband fleeing because he killed your friend? Or because you did? I guess I&rsquo;d have to read the book to find out.</p>
      </div>
      </div>
        <div class="footer">
    <div class="footer-data"><div class="footer-links"><ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/contact.php" title="">Contact</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/support.php" title="">Support</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/privacy.php" title="">Privacy</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/rights.php" title="">Rights</a></li></ul></div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="copyright">Copyright (c) 1999-2026 earthli.com. All Rights Reserved.</div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="versions">Powered by <ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore/app_news.php">earthli News 3.7</a></li><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore" title="">earthli WebCore&trade; 3.7</a></li></ul></div></div>    </div>
      </div>
  </div>  </body>
</html>
]]>
  </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
      <title type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[Books read in 2022]]>
  </title>
    <id>https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=4418</id>
    <link href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=4418"/>
    <updated>2023-02-02T22:51:24+01:00</updated>
    <author>
        <name type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[Marco von Ballmoos]]>
  </name>
      <uri>https://earthli.com/users/marco</uri>
    </author>
      <summary type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<p>As I started doing in the previous year, I&rsquo;ve included a partial, &ldquo;teaser&rdquo; review of each book in this article as well as linked a separate article which includes a full review with all notes, as well as citations and rough notes.</p>
<p>I only hit 20 titles this year, but some of them were pretty hefty... [<a class="complete-text-link" href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=4418">More</a>]</p>
]]>
  </summary>
      <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<html lang="en">
  <head>
    <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/themes/ice.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/fonts/raleway.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/core/medium.css">
  </head>
  <body>
<div class="style-controls">  <div class="page">
    <div class="page-body">
<div class="info-box-top">
<p>
Published by <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_user.php?name=marco" title="Marco von Ballmoos" class="visible">marco</a> on <span class="date-time">2. Feb 2023 22:51:24 (GMT-5)</span>
</p>
</div>
      <div class="text-flow wide">
  <p>As I started doing in the previous year, I&rsquo;ve included a partial, &ldquo;teaser&rdquo; review of each book in this article as well as linked a separate article which includes a full review with all notes, as well as citations and rough notes.</p>
<p>I only hit 20 titles this year, but some of them were pretty hefty tomes, though none in German and only one in French. A couple of public-policy books this year, with the accompanying analysis.</p>
<dl><dt class="field">Project Hail Mary (2021)</dt>
<dd><div class=" "><p>by <em>Andy Weir</em></p>
<p>Andy Weir manages to comes up with consistently interesting science-fiction ideas and entertaining yarns (even if it&rsquo;s rather obvious in some places where he&rsquo;s almost writing a screenplay). I really wish he would find a co-author to help him smooth out some of the more YA aspects of his writing. Still, this was a fun book to read—after the first third.</p>
<p>As with <em>The Martian</em>, it took me about that long to either get used to the writing style or for Weir to settle in and write more reasonably. I do feel that the overuse of inner monologue when Grace first woke up at the beginning of the book was something I didn&rsquo;t imagine. It was quite jarring and seemed a very forced way of introducing the character and background for the rest of the story. It got the job done, but I nearly gave up [1], which would have been a shame—because there are some intriguing concepts and ideas in the rest of the book.</p>
<p>This is not the hardest of hardcore science-fiction. There&rsquo;s a lot of science in it, and a lot of engineering as well (Weir mentions all of the people he consulted), but he also elides a bunch of stuff in the &ldquo;squishy sciences&rdquo; to get to where he wants to go. That&rsquo;s OK! Focus on what you&rsquo;re interested in and make a rollicking tale! Still, it <em>doesn&rsquo;t matter</em>. It&rsquo;s a story. Lay back and enjoy the ride. I don&rsquo;t think it&rsquo;s in the same class as <em>The Expanse</em>, but neither does it get over-wordy like that series. It moves relatively quickly.</p>
<p>I&rsquo;ve included <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=4415">notes, citations and errata</a> in a separate post.</p>
</div></dd>
<dt class="field">Their Eyes Were Watching God (1937)</dt>
<dd><div class=" "><p>by <em>Zora Neale Hurston</em></p>
<p>Janie Crawford returns to the village where she has a home, crossing past the hooting and hollering peanut gallery stationed outside the town store. She continues onward, ignoring them, to visit her friend Pheoby, who’d stood by her all the time she’d been gone and who was dying to know what had happened since she’d left.</p>
<p>The rest of the book is Janie recounting the story of her life that led to her, at about forty years old, sitting on that porch with her friend Pheoby.</p>
<p>This book is absolutely wonderfully written. The southern patois takes some getting used to, but after a while, it flows as if it were your own dialect. Although the author/narrator does not write in patois, she does have a way of expressing herself that you don&rsquo;t read much anymore. For example, early in the book, she writes of the evening during which Janie regaled Pheoby with her tale,</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Time makes everything old so the kissing, young darkness became a monstropolous old thing while Janie talked.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>After Pheoby&rsquo;s gone home and Janie is in her home, alone, she feels a hint of loneliness. She goes upstairs to her bedroom,  a room still teeming with memories of her first days with Tea Cake,</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The kiss of his memory made pictures of love and light against the wall. Here was peace. She pulled in her horizon like a great fish-net. Pulled it from around the waist of the world and draped it over her shoulder. So much of life in its meshes! She called in her soul to come and see.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>I&rsquo;ve included <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=4419">notes, citations and errata</a> in a separate post.</p>
</div></dd>
<dt class="field">Persepolis Rising (2017)</dt>
<dd><div class=" "><p>by <em>James S. A. Corey</em></p>
<p>This is the seventh novel in <cite>The Expanse</cite> series. It picks up the story nearly three decades after the end of the last book. The Transport Union manages traffic between the Ring Colonies, led by Camina Drummer. She is comfortable in her role, but laments the hidebound nature of bureaucracy.</p>
<p>The Rocinante works for the Transport Union and are forced to do a prisoner transport, which Holden does, but isn&rsquo;t happy about. This triggers a decision by Naomi and Holden to announce their retirement and hand off the <em>Roci</em> to Bobbie and the crew.</p>
<p>Naomi and Holden are on Medina Station for only a week before two Laconian ships enter the Ring System through their gate. No-one&rsquo;s heard from them in almost thirty years. They&rsquo;ve been busy building enormous battleships with protomolecule technology, generations ahead of what the rest of humanity is still using.</p>
<p>They announce that they&rsquo;re there to take over the empire and for everyone to give up peacefully. Any violence will have been forced upon the Laconians, who are only interested in running the human empire better. That is, you have to do what they say all the time, but the Laconians are obviously so much better than everyone else that no-one who isn&rsquo;t a complete idiot could possibly mind.</p>
<p>I&rsquo;ve included <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=4329">notes, citations and errata</a> in a separate post.</p>
</div></dd>
<dt class="field">Amusing Ourselves to Death (1984)</dt>
<dd><div class=" "><p>by <em>Neil Postman</em></p>
<p>This book explores the thesis that printed material is the sweet spot for delivering information to human beings. The move in the mid-twentieth century to audiovisual presentation is a step in the wrong direction. The medium of television transforms everything it touches into entertainment. The book was written in 1985 and deals with the hole punched in culture by television.</p>
<p>Thirty-seven years later, the direness of the situation has been turned up several notches, with the advent of the kind of Internet that we of course ended up with, thanks to our mad form of capitalism that absorbs everything it touches. The state of information is more insane, incomprehensible, and superficial than ever.</p>
<p>It is a world where ignorance is bliss. The less you understand of the firehose of information and propaganda fired at you, the better.</p>
<p>He never quite gets around to addressing the corruptive influence of capitalism and market forces on information-dissemination to an informed public.</p>
<p>He also seems to be misled by the reporters who blame their lack of coverage on their listeners, when it is they who determine what people want, or at least their bosses. Cart before the horse. Maybe the NYT was different then, but this sounds suspiciously exactly like the same shit they pull today.</p>
<p>I&rsquo;ve included <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=4447">notes, citations and errata</a> in a separate post.</p>
</div></dd>
<dt class="field">No One Is Talking About This (2021)</dt>
<dd><div class=" "><p>by <em>Patricia Lockwood</em></p>
<p>Lockwood has a great feel for using a modern, hip vernacular to describe this world of ours. Her styles feels a bit like Gibson, with his similar penchant for emphasizing cultural relevance with product placement.</p>
<p>The first half of the book is about the &ldquo;portal&rdquo;, a kind of stream-of-consciousness brain-dump about what it&rsquo;s like to live on the Internet and simultaneously in the modern world as a privileged first-worlder. It holds up relatively well, filled with interesting snatches and snippets from that stream. That&rsquo;s not a dig: the first half of the book is very clearly an absolute pastiche of thoughts that are at most a single page. It&rsquo;s better than a Twitter stream by far, but it has the same kind of staccato, fragmented feel.</p>
<p>This book reveals a glimpse into what it was like to mature online, in the portal, aware enough to note the inconsistency of information, the superficiality of supposed wisdom, but not to resist the wiles and subjugation, the seemingly inevitable dilution of experience to the minimum required for ensuring exchange of meager wealth for sustenance. The machine optimizes until no-one is happy, but no-one can leave.</p>
<p>Where the first part of the book is about the hyperactive superficiality and shallowness of online life, the second half of the book is autobiographical. It&rsquo;s about her sister&rsquo;s baby, who&rsquo;s born with a debilitating disease that serious impacts her ability to interact with the world and also to stay in it. Her family rallies around the little life as if it were the most important thing in the world—because, to them, she is. In a way, the penchant for superficiality, for focusing on details, is the same, but this time it&rsquo;s landed on protecting a little life&rsquo;s ability to experience the world, even given the paucity of sensory equipment with which she was born.</p>
<p>This experience makes her less cynical, less world-weary, more likely to believe in people&rsquo;s having reasons for being the way that they are. It leaves more room for empathy.</p>
<p>The first part is entertaining and full of delightful writing. The second is sweet and insightful and also full of delightful writing. I don&rsquo;t know that I&rsquo;ll read more of Lockwood, but I&rsquo;m glad I read this one.</p>
<p>I&rsquo;ve included <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=4491">notes, citations and errata</a> in a separate post.</p>
</div></dd>
<dt class="field">The Internet is not what you think it is: A History, a Philosophy, a Warning (2022)</dt>
<dd><div class=" "><p>by <em>Justin E.H. Smith</em></p>
<p>The meandering in my longer review linked below will perhaps give you a flavor of the distances that the author ranges in his treatment of the history, potential, and failings of the Internet. He is a fearless spelunker in the archives of the far past, seeking and finding analogous technologies and situations in decidedly less technologically advanced times—even in the natural world, outside of the species (whale songs were telecommunication long before the telegraph).</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The principal charges against the internet, deserving of our attention here, instead have to do with the ways in which it has limited our potential and our capacity for thriving, the ways in which it has distorted our nature and fettered us. Let us enumerate them.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 9</div></div><p>Not all of the book is as purely esoteric as I&rsquo;ve made it out to be. There are some very down-to-Earth bits with an examination of the—admittedly, thus far largely corrosive and not at all achieving its non-corrosive potential—influence that the Internet is having on human behavior, especially as it affects how we live and work and … be.</p>
<p>For example, we have clearly allowed the same drive to capitalize every facet of our existence take over the Internet as well. This one-size-fits-all solution has already proven quite detrimental and is largely to blame for the curve of potential we saw in the mid-90s begin to bend so quickly and precipitously back downward.</p>
<p>The profit motive has led to an optimization not for any societally beneficial purpose—to which the Internet would, in principle, be eminently suited—but to manipulate our amazing biology in the coarsest possible manner to elicit impressions from us that can be converted to digital Internet points, which eventually wander their way back to a currency that means something in the real world. Instead of teaching us how to be better, wiser, more empathetic, they have chosen to pick the lower-hanging fruit and farm our dopamine for profit. It&rsquo;s a sad, sad local maximum in the vast landscape of potential that revealed itself at the beginning of this whole experiment.</p>
<p>I&rsquo;ve included <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=4495">notes, citations and errata</a> in a separate post.</p>
</div></dd>
<dt class="field">Tiamat’s Wrath (2019)</dt>
<dd><div class=" "><p>by <em>James S. A. Corey</em></p>
<p>This is the eighth book of the The Expanse series. It’s four years after Laconia came in and took over everything in Persepolis Rising. Chrisjen Avasarala has finally died and been interred in the capitol city on Laconia. Holden, who is still being held prisoner there, attends the funeral. He attends a lot of state functions, keeping his ear to the ground. Duarte tolerates him because of his first-hand knowledge of the civilization that destroyed the protomolecule engineers and that has “attacked” humanity.</p>
<p>Saba is on Medina Station, running the resistance with Naomi, who’s living in a shipping container, planning from the center of her spiderweb. Bobbie and Alex are still on the Gathering Storm, keeping the ship mostly out of sight in large transports, but occasionally jumping out for a raid. Amos disappeared while on a mission on Laconia. Camina Drummer is still working for the Transport Union, but no longer runs it. Elvi Okoye and Fayez are officially part of a science mission to investigate empty Ring systems to see if there is anything of interest there.</p>
<p>In this volume, Bobbie carries an antimatter bomb in her arms while diving straight at a cruiser in her battle armor. She goes out in a blaze of glory. Laconian soldiers following Teresa manage to kill Amos, who gives up his life charging them, taking out several of them, and making sure to shield Teresa from any possible harm.</p>
<p>Naomi, meanwhile, leads the attack on Laconia itself, with 400 ships drawing away the major force so that Naomi’s crushing blow on the orbiting, protomolecule shipyards can be delivered, destroying Laconia’s ability to produce any more Magnetar-class destroyers.</p>
<p>Amos rescues them all, having been turned into an unkillable machine by the strange dogs of Laconia. He has a connection to the protomolecule and a connection to the others who’ve been transformed in the same way—and he knows that the aliens from the beyond will never stop hunting humanity.</p>
<p>I&rsquo;ve included <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=4439">notes, citations and errata</a> in a separate post.</p>
</div></dd>
<dt class="field">Johnny Got His Gun (1939)</dt>
<dd><div class=" "><p>by <em>Dalton Trumbo</em></p>
<p>This is the story of a young man named Joe Bonham who wakes up in darkness and silence. The last thing he remembers is that he was in Europe, serving in the army during WWI. He slowly learns that it is dark and silent because he is deaf and blind. He learns that he can’t speak because he no longer has a mouth to speak of: no tongue, no teeth, just a weird emptiness that he can sense, but not feel. He can’t feel because he can’t move his arms and legs. He can’t move any of his limbs because they’re no longer attached to his body.</p>
<p>Joe drifts in and out of long reveries. He goes mad. He has strong visions, revenge fantasies. Time passes too slowly. The wheels spin. Joe can’t sleep. He’s always rested. He has no idea what time it is. His circadian rhythm is completely broken. He is exhausted and bored and insomniac and trapped in his own body.</p>
<p>He spends a lot of time thinking about his curtailed youth—he’s so young, he doesn’t even have very much life to reflect back upon. He had one girl who sorta-kinda was into him, maybe. He had one good friend. He reminisces, he builds fantastic castles of fantasy. He fills in the details that led to his recruitment, to his deployment, to his diminution.</p>
<p>I&rsquo;ve included <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=4505">notes, citations and errata</a> in a separate post.</p>
</div></dd>
<dt class="field">Leviathan Falls (2022)</dt>
<dd><div class=" "><p>by <em>James S.A. Corey</em></p>
<p>This is the ninth and final volume of The Expanse. Whereas the first books were set very firmly in hard sci-fi, with plenty of orbital mechanics, the second half of the series got much more into the quasi-religious, quasi-magical nature of truly advanced technology. The protomolecule technology and its inventors were so advanced that anything we have looks positively Newtonian in comparison. The other-dimensional, multiverse-hopping demons that destroyed them are even more powerful and ineffable.</p>
<p>Duarte is awake again, now in possession of faculties that make him something that could only be called a God. He can move his consciousness between the seams of reality to be anywhere he wants, to appear on any ship, in a frame of reference—nothing is beyond him anymore.</p>
<p>Do not get the impression that the books are not good, though! They may have jumped from hard sci-fi to fantasy, but they’ve done it elegantly and with quite a flair for the written word. The descriptions of otherworldly and unimaginable things are wonderful, evoking the “fill in the blanks with your own imagination” writing of the great sci-fi short stories of the 20th century. The descriptions of the unknowable technology and physics of these ancient and advanced and now long-gone alien civilizations provide just enough hooks to hang your own ideas, speculation, and extrapolations on.</p>
<p>I&rsquo;ve included <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=4262">notes, citations and errata</a> in a separate post.</p>
</div></dd>
<dt class="field">La Crise de l’homme (1946)</dt>
<dd><div class=" "><p>by <em>Albert Camus</em></p>
<p>This is a short lecture delivered by Albert Camus at Columbia University. He spoke of humanity’s moral decline—or more the obvious fact that it was less declining and more failing to rise to any occasion—and how we should continue to strive for peace, despite the hopelessness of the endeavor. He takes particular issue with the intrinsic hypocrisy that underlies every society we’ve known.[2]</p>
<p>It is our hypocrisy that prevents us from truly moving forward because we are congenitally incapable of accepting our mistakes, so that we cannot learn from them. Instead, we deny them.</p>
<p>I&rsquo;ve included <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=4530">notes, citations and errata</a> in a separate post.</p>
</div></dd>
<dt class="field">Scoop (1938)</dt>
<dd><div class=" "><p>by <em>Evelyn Waugh</em></p>
<p>This is the story of the press in Great Britain in the 1930s. It paints a decidedly unflattering picture of the entire industry, one that, however hard we would try to claim to the contrary, fits extremely well in describing the media and journalistic culture in this, nearly the end of the first quarter of the 21st century. It is beautifully written, biting satire.</p>
<p>Suffice it to say that absolutely no-one is in any way interested in what actually happened or what the truth of a particular situation or event might be. Lord Copper runs a large newspaper. He is friends with socialite Mrs. Stitch, who is beautiful and a force of chaos in London. She is friends with John Courtenay Boot, a handsome young man with pretensions of becoming a writer or a journalist or someone famous for writing, at any rate.</p>
<p>He represents that part of the press—which has since because a nearly exclusive majority—that comes from an elite background and finds that telling others what to think seems like a pretty good way to earn a living. To be fair, Boot seems like a reasonably nice guy, but it’s unavoidable that he feels entitled, due to his privileged background, to employment in something associated with letters and leisure.</p>
<p>I&rsquo;ve included <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=4531">notes, citations and errata</a> in a separate post.</p>
</div></dd>
<dt class="field">They Were Soldiers: How the Wounded Return from America’s Wars (2013)</dt>
<dd><div class=" "><p>by <em>Ann Jones</em></p>
<p>This is a wonderfully written and incredibly honest and sobering look at how America treats what it clearly considers to be detritus—the dead and the wounded from its wars. On the one hand, there is an incredible respect and attention to detail for the dead and wounded. The wounded are offered incredible levels of care—right up until they are no longer in danger of dying, but can no longer be of any conceivable use to the military, at which point they are dropped like hot rocks and treated like pariahs.</p>
<p>The dead are scooped into bags when they have been rendered into what are essentially unidentifiable pieces of flesh by bomb-blasts or rocket-attacks. When multiple people are blown to smithereens near each other, the giblets are split into the bags evenly and everyone involved pretends that it matters that they did this.</p>
<p>[…]</p>
<p>The actions of empire are indistinguishable from piracy. An empire only pays for that which it cannot steal. Although an empire’s own citizens are of (almost) no concern to it, it is those under the heel of the empire’s boot who suffer the most.</p>
<p>But this isn’t a book about them, not really. It isn’t that Jones doesn’t care—she’s written a lot about the rest of the world’s suffering, too, and she writes a bit here—but that the book is here to tell us that when war is afoot, when the military rides high, there are no winners. Everything is chewed up and spit out by an uncaring maw, hungry only for the next profit it can excrete in the direction of the tiny elite that always benefit from suffering.</p>
<p>I&rsquo;ve included <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=4538">notes, citations and errata</a> in a separate post.</p>
</div></dd>
<dt class="field">Termination Shock (2021)</dt>
<dd><div class=" "><p>by <em>Neal Stephenson</em></p>
<p>As usual in a Neal Stephenson book, there&rsquo;s a lot going on. As usual in a Stephenson book of late, every single last character is possessed of a unique and ostensibly fascinating background, is confident, self-sufficient and self-reliant, interesting, eloquent, funny, smart, skilled, and almost invariably independently wealthy. Does that take a wee bit of the tension out of the book? You betcha.</p>
<p>There is the constant undertone that people who are not like the characters are guilty of having personally failed to be that awesome through <em>not trying hard enough</em>. Stephenson likes guns, libertarianism, and using ten words where one would suffice—my guess would be that he likes them in that order.</p>
<p>We meet Rufus Grant, a part-Comanche, mostly black ex-Army soldier-turned-rancher/drone-expert who&rsquo;d lost his wife and child to a giant wild boar whose species had gotten a massive upwind in the plains of Texas because of the horrific and ongoing effects of climate change. We learn a lot about guns, wild boars, and Texas geography with Rufus. It&rsquo;s not uninteresting, but it is a pretty long prologue to the action that is coming.</p>
<p>The action is a confluence of Rufus finally getting a shot at his arch-nemesis—a nearly unbelievably and unprecedentedly large wild boar named Snout—and Saskia and co. attempting to land their plane onto the same airstrip where Snout&rsquo;s herd is running for its life. Who is Saskia? She is the Queen of the Netherlands, flying her own plane on a secret mission to meet up with billionaire T.R. Schmidt, the <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lord_Mayor_of_London">Lord Mayor of London</a>, a billionaire from Singapore, extremely old money from Venice, and all of their associated partners, who are all incredibly gifted, fabulously intelligent, and breathtakingly attractive.</p>
<p>They are there to witness T.R.&lsquo;s opening ceremony for his geoengineering gun called Pina2bo, which boosts drones full of sulfur into the upper stratosphere in a continuous loop, with the drones falling back to Earth, flying home, being refilled with sulfur, and, finally, going for another ride into the upper atmosphere. Basically, Stephenson loves guns so much that he wrote an entire book about the biggest one he could think of.</p>
<p>I&rsquo;ve included <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=4559">notes, citations and errata</a> in a separate post.</p>
</div></dd>
<dt class="field">Agency (The Jackpot Trilogy Book 2) (2021)</dt>
<dd><div class=" "><p>by <em>William Gibson</em></p>
<p>This is a sequel to <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3865">The Peripheral</a> that, because of the wormhole technology involved, actually takes place <em>before</em> that book. The story takes place in an alternate future that had suffered through something called the &ldquo;Jackpot&rdquo;, which was a climate apocalypse that eliminated pretty much everything we&rsquo;re being told it will actually eliminate, but from which a tiny portion of humanity managed to escape with technology wildly beyond ours. They have flying cars, cloaking technology, incredible AIs, and also a mysterious (supposedly Chinese) server through which you can access the pasts of alternate realities (stubs). They also have oligarchs who run pretty much everything.</p>
<p>An extremely powerful woman named Ainsley Lowbeer has made it her mission to prevent what happened in her reality from happening in those of others, regardless of the fact that the changes she manages to make to their future won&rsquo;t affect her own in any way at all. However, she&rsquo;s still opposed by the klepts (oligarchs) of her world. Because the klepts have their domino theory and they don’t even want people in completely unreachable alternate continua to be out of their reach. They can’t take those people&rsquo;s money, but they can ensure that their ideology survives and allows the other continuum’s klepts to enrich themselves, as God intended.</p>
<p>This time, the mysterious server has provided Lowbeer and her crew with a connection to an alternate reality even earlier than the one explored in <em>The Peripheral</em>. As in that book, Lowbeer&rsquo;s crew has a powerful presence in this alternate past, not only because they are so technologically advanced, but because their own pasts are similar enough that they know how to make a ton of money (à la Biff Tanner in <em>Back to the Future II</em>).</p>
<p>I&rsquo;ve included <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=4588">notes, citations and errata</a> in a separate post.</p>
</div></dd>
<dt class="field">The Plot (2021)</dt>
<dd><div class=" "><p>by <em>Jean Hanff Korelitz</em></p>
<p>This is a kind of a meta-plot-twist book: it&rsquo;s a book with multiple pretty inventive plot twists about an author who becomes famous for having written a book with a nearly shockingly inventive and unique plot twist.</p>
<p>Jacob Finch Bonner is an author who stormed out of the gate, more or less, with a highly critically acclaimed first novel that never landed on the NYT best-seller list, but garnered a few industry awards that left everyone waiting for his next book. He takes a swipe at it, but fails utterly, selling only a few hundred copies. His agent doesn&rsquo;t give up, but it looks grim. </p>
<p>The next few years are tough, as he parlays his initial fame into a living of sorts, working at writer&rsquo;s retreats. he kinda sorta genuinely tries to help, but he can barely hide his contempt for them, for his peers, and for himself. So it&rsquo;s years later and he&rsquo;s dragging around a laptop with the corpse of his never-published third book and the desperate scraps that make up what he would only the most desperate and hopeful person could even call something that might become his fourth book.</p>
<p>He&rsquo;s a pretty sad dude until, at one of these writer&rsquo;s retreats, he meets an arrogant young man whose confidence in his own completely unproven abilities rest upon his having thought of the most amazing plot for a book. He shares a few pages with Jacob, who deems the writing style surprisingly solid, though not stellar.</p>
<p>The young man spills the rest of his plot in order to prove to Jacob that he really will be unstoppable. After having heard the plot, Jacob can&rsquo;t disagree, grinding his teeth in his mind at the absolute injustice of such a brilliant plot having found its way into the head of a hack like that young man when an author of more stature and talent like Jacob would have been a much more-deserving target.</p>
<p>I&rsquo;ve included <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=4596">notes, citations and errata</a> in a separate post.</p>
</div></dd>
<dt class="field">War is the Greatest Evil (2022)</dt>
<dd><div class=" "><p>by <em>Chris Hedges</em></p>
<p>This is an excellent book. Everyone should read it, but especially every American should read it. It&rsquo;s not an easy read, but neither is it easy to confront the fact that you&rsquo;re part of a monstrous machine that chews up poor people and spits out yachts.</p>
<p>This machine runs on war. It runs on conquest, pillage, and piracy and all that war entails. It not only doesn&rsquo;t care about the overwhelming number of victims of all kinds—those directly killed, those grievously injured, those whose livelihoods are ruined by the shattered societies it leaves in its wake—it just completely fails to acknowledge that they even exist.</p>
<p>Chris Hedges is here to remind you. He is here to awaken you from the hypocritical slumber that engenders the complicity that serves as fuel for the war machine.</p>
<p>Chris Hedges is rarely a ray of sunshine. His writing is almost never funny. He is nearly relentlessly bleak because he writes truth. He does not swerve from his purpose. He wants people to stop fooling themselves and fight the right battles—the real enemy. He sacrifices an ignorant, beckoning bliss for us.</p>
<p>The entire book is a wealth of brilliant writing, expressing different facets of the same thought over and over. He&rsquo;s like a dog gnawing a bone—but it&rsquo;s understandable. The entire concept of war is so horrible that you just can&rsquo;t stop searching for a formulation that will finally convince people to rise up and stop it. He is a much better writer than I—he is a poet in prose—so I use many citations plucked from the long list below to review and describe his book.</p>
<p>I&rsquo;ve included <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=4614">notes, citations and errata</a> in a separate post.</p>
</div></dd>
<dt class="field">The Last Wish: Introducing the Witcher (The Witcher Saga Book 1) (1993)</dt>
<dd><div class=" "><p>by <em>Andrzej Sapkowski</em></p>
<p>This is the first book featuring the Witcher, a magically gifted, preternaturally physically gifted, and potion-enhanced monster-hunter. He wields a silver sword, pulled quickly from a sheath on his back. His hair is long and silver, his eyes jet black. His eyes match his head-to-toe leather armor, studded with spikes along the shoulders. The ladies love him; his enemies fear him. He knows lore; he is good with animals. He is wise and bides his time. He is a bad-ass, an excellent fighter. He is a traveler of lands far and wide.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;During his life, the witcher had met thieves who looked like town councilors, councilors who looked like beggars, harlots who looked like princesses, princesses who looked like calving cows and kings who looked like thieves.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 81</div></div><p>The framing story is that he is resting after having been injured in a monster battle. During his convalescence, he reminisces about seven recent events. These stories form the basis of what would be become the Witcher Saga. We meet Ciri&rsquo;s grandmother Calanthe and her mother Pavetta. We meet Yennefer of Vengerberg. We meet Dandelion the troubadour. We meet Dennis Cranmer, the dwarf captain. They will all figure in the books that follow.</p>
<p>These stories correspond, more or less, to the first season of the <a href="https://www.imdb.com/title/tt5180504/">Netflix series of the same name</a>.</p>
<p>I&rsquo;ve included <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=4623">notes, citations and errata</a> in a separate post.</p>
</div></dd>
<dt class="field">The Rieter Manual of Spinning (2008)</dt>
<dd><div class=" "><p>by <em>Werner Klein</em></p>
<p>The first volume is the densest, with a detailed overview of all processes: opening, blowing, drawing, carding, combing, and spinning. Subsequent volumes cover carding and combing in detail, with volumes four, five, and six covering ring-spinning, rotor-spinning, and air-jet spinning (as well as other niche, or never-productive/no-longer-used techniques), respectively.</p>
<p>There is a wealth of detail and research and knowledge that goes into converting fibers—natural or artificial—into yarn and then fabric. The history of spinning and spinning technology is very old. The history of automation is centuries old.</p>
<p>The focus in these books is on cotton, which is collected from cotton plants with various techniques and varying levels of automation. With a higher level of automation comes a higher collection speed—which is more cost-effective and efficient—but it also engenders more contamination and with smaller particles, which increases the need for cleaning in latter stages.</p>
<p>As with everything else in the spinning world, which technology you use depends heavily on your raw material and the quality of the product you&rsquo;re trying to produce. You balance the amount of piecing you need to do (does one process put a higher strain on the yarn?), the amount of hairiness you&rsquo;re willing to accept, and so on. Some technologies are faster, or can be scaled up in speed more. Some technologies have setups that are quicker to clean or to load with material. Rotor-spinning is more automatable, which is attractive to those mills that can afford the capital investment.</p>
<p>All in all, this was a fascinating set of volumes about the world in which I&rsquo;ve made my career over the last year.</p>
<p>I&rsquo;ve included <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=4620">notes, citations and errata</a> in a separate post.</p>
</div></dd>
<dt class="field">Caged (2020)</dt>
<dd><div class=" "><p>by <em>New Jersey Prison Theater Cooperative</em></p>
<p>This is a play about prison and prisoners. Chris Hedges worked on this play with his friend Boris Franklin. They met when Boris was one of Chris’s students in a writing course in prison in New Jersey. They are still friends today. There were 28 students in all, all of whom contributed to the story. Chris and Boris hammered a play out of their over two dozen stories, with the assistance of Chris’s wife, actress Eunice Wong.</p>
<p>This is a story about prison, and prisoners, but it’s mostly about the society that supports and promotes prison and sends certain people to prison. It is about wasted effort, lost chances, and dashed hopes. It is about Omar, who’s in prison because he took the fall for his younger brother Quan, his mother Chimene’s favorite. The justice system isn’t done with Omar. They’re squeezing him for more information on his associates. They’re trying to get him to talk. Omar’s in his father’s old cell. His father Jimmy is no longer in prison, but he’s a junkie, a constant disappointment to his family.</p>
<p>I&rsquo;ve included <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=4635">notes, citations and errata</a> in a separate post.</p>
</div></dd>
<dt class="field">Blood of Elves (The Witcher Book 3 / The Witcher Saga Novels Book 1) (1994, pl; 2008, en)</dt>
<dd><div class=" "><p>by <em>Andrzej Sapkowski</em></p>
<p>This is the third Witcher book, but the first book in what is called the Witcher Saga. Geralt is still the same. The world is worse.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;[…] in his day the world was a better place. Duplicity was a character flaw to be ashamed of. Sincerity did not bring shame.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 73</div></div><p>The kingdom of Cintra has fallen to Nilfgard. Queen Calanthe is dead, Ciri is on the run. Nilfgard seeks her with all of its power, bending its will to finding the heiress who could try to take back the throne (although some in the books point out that a woman can&rsquo;t inherit the throne without a king anyway).</p>
<p>This novel gets very political very quickly, mapping our world&rsquo;s problems onto that of the Witcher, but it&rsquo;s exceedingly well-done and not ham-fisted at all. He&rsquo;s no longer hunting so many monsters and is, instead, at the center of controversy. Some know that Geralt was promised Calanthe&rsquo;s granddaughter Ciri as a surprise. They suspect strongly that he knows where she is; he does his best to convince the world that she&rsquo;s really gone.</p>
<p>I&rsquo;ve included <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=4642">notes, citations and errata</a> in a separate post.</p>
</div></dd>
</dl>      </div>
      </div>
        <div class="footer">
    <div class="footer-data"><div class="footer-links"><ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/contact.php" title="">Contact</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/support.php" title="">Support</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/privacy.php" title="">Privacy</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/rights.php" title="">Rights</a></li></ul></div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="copyright">Copyright (c) 1999-2026 earthli.com. All Rights Reserved.</div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="versions">Powered by <ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore/app_news.php">earthli News 3.7</a></li><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore" title="">earthli WebCore&trade; 3.7</a></li></ul></div></div>    </div>
      </div>
  </div>  </body>
</html>
]]>
  </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
      <title type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[Blood of Elves (The Witcher Book 3 / The Witcher Saga Novels Book 1) by Andrzej Sapkowski (1994, pl; 2008, en) (read in 2022)]]>
  </title>
    <id>https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=4642</id>
    <link href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=4642"/>
    <updated>2023-02-02T22:49:59+01:00</updated>
    <author>
        <name type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[Marco von Ballmoos]]>
  </name>
      <uri>https://earthli.com/users/marco</uri>
    </author>
      <summary type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<p><small class="notes">Standard disclaimer [1]</small></p>
<p>This is the third Witcher book, but the first book in what is called the Witcher Saga. Geralt is still the same. The world is worse.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;[…] in his day the world was a better place. Duplicity was a character flaw to be ashamed of. Sincerity did not bring shame.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 73</div></div><p><a href="https://www.earthli.com/data/news/attachments/entry/4642/blood-of-elves.jpg"><img src="https://www.earthli.com/data/news/attachments/entry/4642/blood-of-elves_tn.jpg" alt=" " class=" align-left"></a>The kingdom of... [<a class="complete-text-link" href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=4642">More</a>]</p>
]]>
  </summary>
      <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<html lang="en">
  <head>
    <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/themes/ice.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/fonts/raleway.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/core/medium.css">
  </head>
  <body>
<div class="style-controls">  <div class="page">
    <div class="page-body">
<div class="info-box-top">
<p>
Published by <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_user.php?name=marco" title="Marco von Ballmoos" class="visible">marco</a> on <span class="date-time">2. Feb 2023 22:49:59 (GMT-5)</span>
</p>
</div>
      <div class="text-flow wide">
  <p><small class="notes">Standard disclaimer [1]</small></p>
<p>This is the third Witcher book, but the first book in what is called the Witcher Saga. Geralt is still the same. The world is worse.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;[…] in his day the world was a better place. Duplicity was a character flaw to be ashamed of. Sincerity did not bring shame.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 73</div></div><p><a href="https://www.earthli.com/data/news/attachments/entry/4642/blood-of-elves.jpg"><img src="https://www.earthli.com/data/news/attachments/entry/4642/blood-of-elves_tn.jpg" alt=" " class=" align-left"></a>The kingdom of Cintra has fallen to Nilfgard. Queen Calanthe is dead, Ciri is on the run. Nilfgard seeks her with all of its power, bending its will to finding the heiress who could try to take back the throne (although some in the books point out that a woman can&rsquo;t inherit the throne without a king anyway).</p>
<p>This novel gets very political very quickly, mapping our world&rsquo;s problems onto that of the Witcher, but it&rsquo;s exceedingly well-done and not ham-fisted at all. He&rsquo;s no longer hunting so many monsters and is, instead, at the center of controversy. Some know that Geralt was promised Calanthe&rsquo;s granddaughter Ciri as a surprise. They suspect strongly that he knows where she is; he does his best to convince the world that she&rsquo;s really gone.</p>
<p>An elf, gnome, and dwarf gang named <em>Scoia&rsquo;tael</em> (the squirrels) strikes terror all over the place. Ciri sticks with Geralt they travel together to <em>Kaer Morhen</em>, a castle the Witchers call home. There, Geralt recruits Triss Merigold to help him train Ciri, but she can only help so much. Ciri&rsquo;s inherited powers—she&rsquo;s a &ldquo;Source&rdquo;—are too strong for her to help control. Geralt will have to turn to Yennefer, with whom he has some unnamed bad blood.</p>
<p>A wizard named Reince is also looking for Geralt, taking Dandelion hostage. Yennefer saves him, wounding Reince in the face. Reince manages to escape, thanks to a portal opened by his master, a much more powerful—and still unknown—mage.</p>
<p>Geralt, Ciri, and Triss leave Kaer Morhen, traveling far before joining up with dwarf Yarpen Zigrin&rsquo;s wagon train. Ciri learns more about the elves and their history. They are attacked by the squirrels. Geralt pursues Rience and confronts him in a showdown. Rience once again escapes, but he&rsquo;s injured again. So is Geralt, though. Another sorceress Philippa Eilhart is also there and prevents Geralt from giving chase.</p>
<p>Some time later, Ciri is under Yennefer&rsquo;s tutelage and they are grudging friends. This part is told in flashbacks. Ciri is learning to master Chaos, the source of magic.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Magic extends its hand towards you from behind the closed door, towards you, a tiny grain of sand in the workings of the Clock of Fate. Chaos extends its talons towards you, still uncertain if you will be its tool or an obstacle in its design. That which Chaos shows you in your dreams is this very uncertainty. Chaos is afraid of you, Child of Destiny. But it wants you to be the one who feels fear.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 292</div></div><p>This book corresponds roughly to the second season of the second season of the <a href="https://www.imdb.com/title/tt5180504/">Netflix series of the same name</a>.</p>
<p><hr></p>
<div class="footnote-reference"><span id="footnote_DRAFTABLE_ENTRY_4642_1_body" class="footnote-number">[1]</span> Disclaimer: these are notes I took while reading this book. They include citations I found interesting or enlightening or particularly well-written. In some cases, I&rsquo;ve pointed out which of these applies to which citation; in others, I have not. Any benefit you gain from reading these notes is purely incidental to the purpose they serve of reminding me of what I once read. Please see Wikipedia for a summary if I&rsquo;ve failed to provide one sufficient for your purposes. If my notes serve to trigger an interest in this book, then I&rsquo;m happy for you.</div><h2>Citations</h2><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;“Indeed,” said Baron Vilibert, looking defiantly at the elf. “You have read some very interesting things into this ballad, honoured sir. An unnecessary war, you say? You’d like to avoid such a tragedy in the future, would you? Are we to understand that if the Nilfgaardians were to attack us again you would advise that we capitulate? Humbly accept the Nilfgaardian yoke?”</p>
<p>&ldquo;“Life is a priceless gift and should be protected,” the elf replied coldly. “Nothing justifies wide-scale slaughter and sacrifice of life, which is what the battles at Sodden were—both the battle lost and the battle won. Both of them cost the humans thousands of lives. And with them, you lost unimaginable potential—&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 16</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Aleays the same discussion about war. If you&rsquo;re mugged, give your wallet. If your country&rsquo;s attacked, give not a square inch of territory and fight to the last citizen&rsquo;s breath before you parley.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 16</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;“What do they want from us?” yelled Vera Loewenhaupt. “Why are they bent on persecuting us? Why don’t they leave us in peace, leave us to our lives and work? What do the Nilfgaardians want?”</p>
<p>&ldquo;“They want our blood!” howled Baron Vilibert.</p>
<p>&ldquo;“And our land!” someone cried from the crowd of peasants.</p>
<p>&ldquo;“And our women!” chimed in Sheldon Skaggs, with a ferocious glower.&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 16</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;“Nilfgaard is ruled by Emperor Emhyr var Emreis, a tyrant and autocrat who enforces obedience with whip, noose and axe!” thundered Baron Vilibert. “What are you proposing, sir dwarf? How are we supposed to close ranks? With similar tyranny? And which king, which kingdom, in your opinion, should subordinate the others? In whose hands would you like to see the sceptre and knout?”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 19</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The elf smiled derisively. “We’ve been combining our blood for generations, for centuries, your race and mine, and doing so quite successfully—fortunately or unfortunately, I don’t know. You started persecuting mixed relationships less than a quarter of a century ago and, incidentally, not very successfully. So show me a human now who hasn’t a dash of Seidhe Ichaer, the blood of the Elder Race.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 20</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Intolerance and superstition has always been the domain of the more stupid amongst the common folk and, I conjecture, will never be uprooted, for they are as eternal as stupidity itself. There, where mountains tower today, one day there will be seas; there where today seas surge, will one day be deserts. But stupidity will remain stupidity. Nicodemus de Boot, Meditations on Life, Happiness and Prosperity&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 44</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;[…] in his day the world was a better place. Duplicity was a character flaw to be ashamed of. Sincerity did not bring shame.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 73</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;“I just wanted to be honest. I don’t want to get mixed up in this conflict. I want to remain neutral.”</p>
<p>&ldquo;“It’s impossible!” yelled Yarpen. “It’s impossible to remain neutral, don’t you understand that? No, you don’t understand anything. Oh, get off my wagon, get on your horse, and get out of my sight, with your arrogant neutrality. You get on my nerves.”&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 134</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;You’ve grasped the nature of the Scoia’taels quickly, you like the slogans. You know why you understand them so well? Because the Scoia’taels are brats too. They’re little snotheads who don’t understand that they’re being egged on, that someone’s taking advantage of their childish stupidity by feeding them slogans about freedom.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 137</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;“Because you multiply like rabbits.” The dwarf ground his teeth. “You’d do nothing but screw day in day out, without discrimination, with just anyone and anywhere. And it’s enough for your women to just sit on a man’s trousers and it makes their bellies swell… Why have you gone so red, crimson as a poppy? You wanted to know, didn’t you? So you’ve got the honest truth and faithful history of a world where he who shatters the skulls of others most efficiently and swells women’s bellies fastest reigns. And it’s just as hard to compete with you people in murdering as it is in screwing—&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 137</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;“That water’s a stupid idea,” stated Regan Dahlberg, spitting out a bone. “Washing can only harm you when you’re sick. When you’re healthy, too, come to that. You remember old Schrader? His wife once told him to wash, and Schrader went and died soon afterwards.”</p>
<p>&ldquo;“Because a rabid dog bit him.”</p>
<p>&ldquo;“If he hadn’t washed, the dog wouldn’t have bitten him.”&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 138</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Because I, Yarpen Zigrin, coward, traitor and renegade, state that we should not kill each other. I state that we ought to live. Live in such a way that we don’t, later, have to ask anyone for forgiveness. The heroic Elirena… She had to ask. Forgive me, she begged, forgive me. To hell with that! It’s better to die than to live in the knowledge that you’ve done something that needs forgiveness.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 143</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;“During high tide,” interrupted Geralt, “when the incoming tide wave passes the Novigrad canals, there is no water—to use the word precisely—in the Delta at all. There is a liquid made up of excrement, soapsuds, oil and dead rats.”</p>
<p>&ldquo;“Unfortunately, unfortunately.” The Master Tutor grew sad. “Degradation of the environment… You may not believe it, but of more than two thousand species of fish living in this river only fifty years ago, not more than nine hundred remain. It is truly sad.”</p>
<p>&ldquo;They both leaned against the railing and stared into the murky green depths. The tide must have already been coming in because the stench of the water was growing stronger. The first dead rats appeared.&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 174</div></div><p>This is from the 90s. So cool that he mixes in straight science in his fantasy world.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;“That’s what a customs war looks like,” Linus Pitt commented on the chaos with a wise expression on his face. “Vizimir forced Novigrad to introduce the ius stapulae. Foltest of Temeria retaliated with a retortive, absolute ius stapulae in Vizima and Gors Velen. That was a great blow for Redanian merchants so Vizimir increased the tax on Temerian products. He is defending the Redanian economy. Temeria is flooded with cheap goods coming from Nilfgaardian manufactories. That’s why the customs officers are so keen. If too many Nilfgaardian goods were to cross the border, the Redanian economy would collapse. Redania has practically no manufactories and the craftsmen wouldn’t be able to cope with competition.”</p>
<p>&ldquo;“In a nutshell,” smiled Geralt, “Nilfgaard is slowly taking over with its goods and gold that which it couldn’t take with arms. Isn’t Temeria defending itself? Hasn’t Foltest blocked his southern borders?”&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 179</div></div><p>Economic war is war and its effects are brutal.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Although the chancellor’s orders forbade students and tutors to drink and play before dusk, drinking and playing took place around the clock in Oxenfurt, for it is well known that if there is anything that makes men thirstier than the acquisition of knowledge it is the full or partial prohibition of drinking.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 192</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Grey and yellow linnets warbled amongst the shrubs in the park adjacent to the students’ dormitories, while an orangutan sat in the poplar having, no doubt, escaped from the zoological gardens in the Department of Natural History.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 194</div></div><p>Nice Pratchett callback.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Shani smiled even more beautifully and Dandelion was once more filled with the desire to finally compose a ballad about girls like her—not too pretty but nonetheless beautiful, girls of whom one dreams at night when those of classical beauty are forgotten after five minutes.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 195</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;A popular saying at King Vizimir’s court held that if Dijkstra states it is noon yet darkness reigns all around, it is time to start worrying about the fate of the sun.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 197</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;“Send a penal expedition to smother the free elves of Dol Blathanna,” added Demavend, frowning. “March an interventionary force into Mahakam. Allow Ervyll of Verden a chance, at last, to get at the dryads in Brokilon. Yes, a blood bath! And any survivors—to the reservations!”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 220</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;But there is a way around that, too, gentlemen. What if it were Nilfgaard who was the aggressor? At Dol Angra for example? Against Aedirn and Lyria? We could arrange that somehow… could stage some tiny provocation… A border incident caused by them? An attack on a border fort, let us say? We will, of course, be prepared—we will react decisively and forcefully, with everybody’s full acceptance,&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 221</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;“Calm down.” Nenneke looked at her coldly and, all of a sudden, somehow oddly without respect. “I said they were natural and absolutely safe. Forgive me, dear, but in this respect I am a greater authority than you. I know it is exceedingly difficult for you to accept someone else’s authority but in this case I am forced to inflict it on you. And let there be no more talk about it.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 278</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;“There are also those according to whom magic is a science. In order to master it, talent and innate ability alone are not enough. Years of keen study and arduous work are essential; endurance and self-discipline are necessary. Magic acquired like this is knowledge, learning, the limits of which are constantly stretched by enlightened and vigorous minds, by experience, experiments and practice. Magic acquired in such a way is progress. It is the plough, the loom, the watermill, the smelting furnace, the winch and the pulley. It is progress, evolution, change. It is constant movement. Upwards. Towards improvement. Towards the stars. The fact that following the Conjunction of the Spheres we discovered magic will, one day, allow us to reach the stars.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 291</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Magic extends its hand towards you from behind the closed door, towards you, a tiny grain of sand in the workings of the Clock of Fate. Chaos extends its talons towards you, still uncertain if you will be its tool or an obstacle in its design. That which Chaos shows you in your dreams is this very uncertainty. Chaos is afraid of you, Child of Destiny. But it wants you to be the one who feels fear.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 292</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;“Lady Yennefer? How does it work with this drawing of the force? If I gather force into myself then there might not be enough left down below. Is it right to do that? Mother Nenneke taught us that we mustn’t take anything just like that, for the fun of it. Even the cherry has to be left on its tree for the birds, so that it can simply fall.”</p>
<p>&ldquo;Yennefer put her arm around Ciri, kissed her gently on the hair at her temple.</p>
<p>&ldquo;“I wish,” she muttered, “others could hear what you said. Vilgefortz, Francesca, Terranova… Those who believe they have exclusive right to the force and can use it unreservedly.&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 305</div></div>      </div>
      </div>
        <div class="footer">
    <div class="footer-data"><div class="footer-links"><ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/contact.php" title="">Contact</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/support.php" title="">Support</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/privacy.php" title="">Privacy</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/rights.php" title="">Rights</a></li></ul></div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="copyright">Copyright (c) 1999-2026 earthli.com. All Rights Reserved.</div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="versions">Powered by <ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore/app_news.php">earthli News 3.7</a></li><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore" title="">earthli WebCore&trade; 3.7</a></li></ul></div></div>    </div>
      </div>
  </div>  </body>
</html>
]]>
  </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
      <title type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[Caged by New Jersey Prison Theater Cooperative (2020) (read in 2022)]]>
  </title>
    <id>https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=4635</id>
    <link href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=4635"/>
    <updated>2023-02-02T22:10:12+01:00</updated>
    <author>
        <name type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[Marco von Ballmoos]]>
  </name>
      <uri>https://earthli.com/users/marco</uri>
    </author>
      <summary type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<p><small class="notes">Standard disclaimer [1]</small></p>
<p><a href="https://www.earthli.com/data/news/attachments/entry/4635/caged_book_cover.jpg"><img src="https://www.earthli.com/data/news/attachments/entry/4635/caged_book_cover_tn.jpg" alt=" " class=" align-right"></a>This is a play about prison and prisoners. Chris Hedges worked on this play with his friend Boris Franklin. They met when Boris was one of Chris&rsquo;s students in a writing course in prison in New Jersey. They are still friends today. There were 28 students in all, all of whom... [<a class="complete-text-link" href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=4635">More</a>]</p>
]]>
  </summary>
      <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<html lang="en">
  <head>
    <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/themes/ice.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/fonts/raleway.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/core/medium.css">
  </head>
  <body>
<div class="style-controls">  <div class="page">
    <div class="page-body">
<div class="info-box-top">
<p>
Published by <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_user.php?name=marco" title="Marco von Ballmoos" class="visible">marco</a> on <span class="date-time">2. Feb 2023 22:10:12 (GMT-5)</span>
</p>
</div>
      <div class="text-flow wide">
  <p><small class="notes">Standard disclaimer [1]</small></p>
<p><a href="https://www.earthli.com/data/news/attachments/entry/4635/caged_book_cover.jpg"><img src="https://www.earthli.com/data/news/attachments/entry/4635/caged_book_cover_tn.jpg" alt=" " class=" align-right"></a>This is a play about prison and prisoners. Chris Hedges worked on this play with his friend Boris Franklin. They met when Boris was one of Chris&rsquo;s students in a writing course in prison in New Jersey. They are still friends today. There were 28 students in all, all of whom contributed to the story. Chris and Boris hammered a play out of their over two dozen stories, with the assistance of Chris&rsquo;s wife, actress Eunice Wong.</p>
<p>This is a story about prison, and prisoners, but it&rsquo;s mostly about the society that supports and promotes prison and sends certain people to prison. It is about wasted effort, lost chances, and dashed hopes. It is about Omar, who&rsquo;s in prison because he took the fall for his younger brother Quan, his mother Chimene&rsquo;s favorite. The justice system isn&rsquo;t done with Omar. They&rsquo;re squeezing him for more information on his associates. They&rsquo;re trying to get him to talk. Omar&rsquo;s in his father&rsquo;s old cell. His father Jimmy is no longer in prison, but he&rsquo;s a junkie, a constant disappointment to his family.</p>
<p>Omar left a son on the outside, Zaire. Omar&rsquo;s sister Sharonda takes care of Zaire because his mother is a junkie, too. Omar meets an older prisoner Ojore, who takes him under his wing.</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Look son, our bodies ain’t worth nothin’ to the man on the streets. Once we locked in a cage we worth $50,000 a year to all dem prison contractors, guards, food service companies, phone companies, laundry services, medical companies an’ prison construction companies. An’ in here we can’t create no problems. People say da system don’t work. That’s ’cause they don’t get it. The system works jus’ the way it designed to work.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>When Chimene dies, Omar manages to get out for a day, to go to the funeral. Quan just likes to bowl, not roll, but the streets get him, in the end. Omar finally gets a decade and a half later, but Quan is gone, taken by a bullet, Chimene is gone. Zaire isn&rsquo;t around anymore. Only Jimmy is still in the old neighborhood, a shattered husk who recognizes Omar and is happy to see him, but quickly asks him for a few bucks.</p>
<p><hr></p>
<div class="footnote-reference"><span id="footnote_DRAFTABLE_ENTRY_4635_1_body" class="footnote-number">[1]</span> Disclaimer: these are notes I took while reading this book. They include citations I found interesting or enlightening or particularly well-written. In some cases, I&rsquo;ve pointed out which of these applies to which citation; in others, I have not. Any benefit you gain from reading these notes is purely incidental to the purpose they serve of reminding me of what I once read. Please see Wikipedia for a summary if I&rsquo;ve failed to provide one sufficient for your purposes. If my notes serve to trigger an interest in this book, then I&rsquo;m happy for you.</div><h2>Citations</h2><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;OMAR: How long this gonna go on?</p>
<p>&ldquo;OJORE: ’Til they break you. Or ’til they don’t. Three days. Three weeks. You don’t break, it go on like this for a long time. An’ if you don’t think you can take it, then don’t start puttin’ yerself through this hell. Just tell ’em what they wanna know from the door.&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 13</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The worst is the psychological, the humiliation, sleep deprivation, sensory disorientation, extreme light or dark, extreme cold or heat and the long weeks and months of solitary. If you don’t have a strong sense of purpose you don’t survive. They want to defeat you mentally. An’ I seen a lot of men defeated.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 14</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;If you are poor and Black, however, you are conditioned for prison in dysfunctional and overcrowded schools where in the morning you are greeted with metal detectors and police and where in the yard there are fights. You live in dangerous, rundown housing projects, whose smell and decay are replicated in moldering prisons. You navigate the streets in deindustrialized wastelands where despair is rampant and the exit doors of drugs, alcohol, crime, and violence are ubiquitous. You are hauled in front of courts to face lists of charges invented by the police, who oversee mini reigns of terror in your neighborhood, to force you to plea out. Few of the incarcerated ever get a jury trial. The justice system does not work for us. Prison was not a huge culture shock for me. And it was not a huge culture shock for most of the brothers I did time with. In America they prepare you for your future.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 19</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;As the United States devolves into a system where the ruling elites have total power, it behooves those on the outside to look closely at what the state has done to those of us in the inside.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 21</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Prison is a lot like the outside world. There is a stratum of people you try to avoid. There are the majority who spend most of their free time slack-jawed in front of a television set, and then there are those who have recovered their integrity and even, to an extent, their moral autonomy. They have risen above prison to become better people. Yet, even they can be arbitrarily disappeared into solitary confinement or shipped to another prison by the administration. Everyone in prison is disposable.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 22</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;You so fucked up when you start you don’t care about nothin’. That’s the energy … hit a motherfucker over the head with a stick! Pause. But when you start to care about shit, then you fucked.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 36</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;I don’t know why niggas even try to steal. We ain’t no good at it. Grab a box of Pampers and we head straight to jail. Now white people, they the Olympians of stealing. Can’t compete with white folks when it comes to takin’ shit. They wrote the book. Stole the whole damn country.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 48</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;I ain’t stop throwing them dice till I turn every last one of they pockets to rabbit ears! Boy I lit their ass up like downtown Atlanta!&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 53</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;OMAR (STANDING UP): Ma, I had to take a plea.</p>
<p>&ldquo;CHIMENE: You ain’t going to trial?</p>
<p>&ldquo;OMAR: They stacked too many charges, Ma. If I go to trial I get thirty. They willin’ to cut it to seventeen if I cop.&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 70</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;OJORE: I expropriated monies in Newark from a capitalist bank … got into a gunfight with the political police.</p>
<p>&ldquo;OMAR: Political police?</p>
<p>&ldquo;OJORE: Yeah, all police is political. They serve the system don’t they? An’ what’s that system? Capitalism.</p>
<p>&ldquo;OMAR: That’s some heavy shit, Ojore …</p>
<p>&ldquo;OJORE: Look son, our bodies ain’t worth nothin’ to the man on the streets. Once we locked in a cage we worth $50,000 a year to all dem prison contractors, guards, food service companies, phone companies, laundry services, medical companies an’ prison construction companies. An’ in here we can’t create no problems. People say da system don’t work. That’s ’cause they don’t get it. The system works jus’ the way it designed to work.&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 83</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;CHIMENE: Quan and Zaire takin’ this awful hard. I want you to talk to ‘em. He didn’t kill that boy, Jimmy.</p>
<p>&ldquo;JIMMY: Since when that matter?</p>
<p>&ldquo;CHIMENE: If he went to trial the truth come out.</p>
<p>&ldquo;JIMMY: That never happen, Chimene. The system see to that. The ones go to trial get the longest sentences jus’ to remind everyone else they better do jus’ what the man tells ’em to do.&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 88</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;SOCIAL WORKER: Your request for a funeral visit has been approved. Sign here. This is the $800 charge to your account for the officers’ overtime and the vehicle fee.</p>
<p>&ldquo;OMAR signs the form.</p>
<p>&ldquo;SOCIAL WORKER: This is the breakdown of the costs. You leave in ten minutes. Get dressed. Don’t make any calls or your trip gets terminated. The administration doesn’t want you to go so don’t do anything stupid, they’ll bring you back, still charge you and toss you in the hole for a week.&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 95</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Bitches do strange things for change. Feel me? Monsters walk the halls at night, stand outside a cell and start yellin’, sayin’ the woman inside smokin’ just so they can enter the cells. The jailhouse relationships intense! Girls on girls. They be drainin’ the toilet pipes to talk all night to their man downstairs. You should hear that chatter. The freaks really come out in the dark. This one girl so loud an’ she never stops talkin’ … day and night. She be, ‘Hey, blah blah blah.’ She talkin’ to different men, which you definitely don’t do. She a ho, on the bowl. Bowl phone love. Crazy.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 107</div></div><p>Certifiable. A completely different reality.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;MCU—Management Control Unit. It was created in Scarborough State Prison in 1975 for prisoners who had not broken prison rules, but who were, because of their political beliefs, deemed to be a threat by prison administrators. It was first used to quarantine members of the Black Panthers and the Black Liberation Army. Prisoners in the MCU spend up to twenty-three hours a day in their cells, are isolated, under constant surveillance, and have their correspondence and reading material heavily censored. It is, in essence, a prison within the prison.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 122</div></div>      </div>
      </div>
        <div class="footer">
    <div class="footer-data"><div class="footer-links"><ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/contact.php" title="">Contact</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/support.php" title="">Support</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/privacy.php" title="">Privacy</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/rights.php" title="">Rights</a></li></ul></div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="copyright">Copyright (c) 1999-2026 earthli.com. All Rights Reserved.</div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="versions">Powered by <ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore/app_news.php">earthli News 3.7</a></li><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore" title="">earthli WebCore&trade; 3.7</a></li></ul></div></div>    </div>
      </div>
  </div>  </body>
</html>
]]>
  </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
      <title type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[The Rieter Manual of Spinning by Werner Klein (2008--2009, 2014) (read in 2022)]]>
  </title>
    <id>https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=4620</id>
    <link href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=4620"/>
    <updated>2023-02-02T21:30:45+01:00</updated>
    <author>
        <name type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[Marco von Ballmoos]]>
  </name>
      <uri>https://earthli.com/users/marco</uri>
    </author>
      <summary type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<p><small class="notes">Standard disclaimer [1]</small></p>
<p>I read this seven-volume, ~500-page treatise on spinning and yarn-production for work. The first four volumes were published in 2008, while the fifth and sixth—rotor-spinning and alternative spinning (primarily air-jet spinning)—were written in 2009, and the seventh... [<a class="complete-text-link" href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=4620">More</a>]</p>
]]>
  </summary>
      <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<html lang="en">
  <head>
    <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/themes/ice.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/fonts/raleway.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/core/medium.css">
  </head>
  <body>
<div class="style-controls">  <div class="page">
    <div class="page-body">
<div class="info-box-top">
<p>
Published by <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_user.php?name=marco" title="Marco von Ballmoos" class="visible">marco</a> on <span class="date-time">2. Feb 2023 21:30:45 (GMT-5)</span>
</p>
</div>
      <div class="text-flow wide">
  <p><small class="notes">Standard disclaimer [1]</small></p>
<p>I read this seven-volume, ~500-page treatise on spinning and yarn-production for work. The first four volumes were published in 2008, while the fifth and sixth—rotor-spinning and alternative spinning (primarily air-jet spinning)—were written in 2009, and the seventh volume—on man-made fibers—arrived five years later, in 2014.</p>
<ul>
<li><a href="#vol1">Volume 1 – Technology of Short-Staple Spinning</a></li>
<li><a href="#vol2">Volume 2 – Blowroom &amp; Carding</a></li>
<li><a href="#vol3">Volume 3 – Spinning Preparation</a></li>
<li><a href="#vol4">Volume 4 – Ring Spinning</a></li>
<li><a href="#vol5">Volume 5 – Rotor Spinning</a></li>
<li><a href="#vol6">Volume 6 – Alternative Spinning Systems</a></li>
<li><a href="#vol7">Volume 7 – Processing of Man-Made Fibres</a></li></ul><p>The first volume is the densest, with a detailed overview of all processes: opening, blowing, drawing, carding, combing, and spinning. Subsequent volumes cover carding and combing in detail, with volumes four, five, and six covering ring-spinning, rotor-spinning, and air-jet spinning (as well as other niche, or never-productive/no-longer-used techniques), respectively.</p>
<p>Although the authors are German native speakers, they wrote impeccable English, with only typos, but no strange usage—other than the normal absolute mangling of the English language perpetrated by textile terminology, which imbues several common English words with completely new meanings.</p>
<p>There is a wealth of detail and research and knowledge that goes into converting fibers—natural or artificial—into yarn and then fabric. The history of spinning and spinning technology is very old. The history of automation is centuries old.</p>
<p>The focus in these books is on cotton, which is collected from cotton plants with various techniques and varying levels of automation. With a higher level of automation comes a higher collection speed—which is more cost-effective and efficient—but it also engenders more contamination and with smaller particles, which increases the need for cleaning in latter stages.</p>
<p>The cotton is baled and stored in giant, hard blocks (220kg) and categorized according to various characteristics, which will influence the <em>laydown</em>, or how the bales will be organized when they are <em>opened</em> in the first stage of processing in a mill. The opener draws layers off the tops of dozens of bales at once (organized in a pattern called the <em>laydown</em>, the determination of which is kind of an art form influenced by several factors, but which has also been researched and determined scientifically). These layers are sucked up into the initial stages of processing, where various mechanisms &ldquo;open&rdquo; the cotton into <em>tufts</em>, which are the desired result of the blowing process. As with subsequent stages, blowing also removes some contamination.</p>
<p>What follows is <em>carding</em>, which converts <em>tufts</em> into <em>fibers</em>, and removes <em>dust</em> and some other contamination. Because of technological advances in blowing, some of the duties classically performed during carding are already taken care of before it arrives at carding. Carding takes the tufts and <em>draws</em> out the tufts into fibers, generating a rope-like material called a <em>sliver</em>. The end product of carding is a <em>can</em> of coiled sliver (pronounced like <em>diver</em>).</p>
<p>Because of the heterogeneous nature of the input product—the entire process is a balancing act of concessions. You want to optimize speed and, therefore, efficiency. In order to optimize speed, you need to know your target quality. The target quality is influenced by the particular nature of the input product at hand. Optimization at one stage may influence speed at another—either negatively or positively. The material will determine which stages need to be used. If the material is easy to clean, then carding may suffice to remove enough contaminants for the target quality. If not, then combing will have to be used to clean the material sufficiently.</p>
<p>What are the important factors? Cleanliness (contamination removal), color consistency, mix of fiber lengths (<em>staples</em>), twist type (determined by spinning type, which determines where it&rsquo;s strong, outside or inside or mixed, i.e., is it strong, but sensitive to abrasion?), fineness, etc.</p>
<p>There are different spinning processes, each with its strengths and weaknesses. Some have lower capital costs; others have lower labor costs. Some require winding (ring-spinning), others do not (rotor- and air-jet-spinning). There is such a plethora of terminology that I don&rsquo;t even know where to begin in explaining it. I learned it all as I read, picking up that drafting and drawing are similar processes of attenuation, performed at different times. Sometimes drafting is part of the spinning process, sometimes not. Clothing is a gear, while ends-down is a dropped thread.</p>
<p>There is the classic ring spinning, which uses a cob as an intermediate transport before finally winding onto spools. The more modern rotor-spinning technique spins directly onto the spool without an intervening cob. Air-jet spinning is also more appropriate for some materials, but hasn&rsquo;t made the inroads so far that rotor-spinning has.</p>
<p>As with everything else in the spinning world, which technology you use depends heavily on your raw material and the quality of the product you&rsquo;re trying to produce. You balance the amount of piecing you need to do (does one process put a higher strain on the yarn?), the amount of hairiness you&rsquo;re willing to accept, and so on. Some technologies are faster, or can be scaled up in speed more. Some technologies have setups that are quicker to clean or to load with material. Rotor-spinning is more automatable, which is attractive to those mills that can afford the capital investment.</p>
<p>All in all, this was a fascinating set of volumes about the world in which I&rsquo;ve made my career over the last year.</p>
<p><hr></p>
<div class="footnote-reference"><span id="footnote_DRAFTABLE_ENTRY_4620_1_body" class="footnote-number">[1]</span> Disclaimer: these are notes I took while reading this book. They include citations I found interesting or enlightening or particularly well-written. In some cases, I&rsquo;ve pointed out which of these applies to which citation; in others, I have not. Any benefit you gain from reading these notes is purely incidental to the purpose they serve of reminding me of what I once read. Please see Wikipedia for a summary if I&rsquo;ve failed to provide one sufficient for your purposes. If my notes serve to trigger an interest in this book, then I&rsquo;m happy for you.</div><h2>Citations</h2><h3><span id="vol1">Volume 1 – Technology of Short-Staple Spinning</span></h3><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Carrying out the basic operations of spinning demands, almost without exception, an open, processable material. However, the raw material enters the spinning mill in highly pressed form (bale) for optimum transport and storage. Thus, opening must precede the other basic operations.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Volume 1 – Page 23</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;To eliminate the hooks, leading hooks must be presented to the comber and trailing hooks to the ring spinning machine. As Fig. 24 and Fig. 25 show, reversal of the hook occurs at each processing stage between the card and these machines. Accordingly, a definite number of machine passages are required in intervening stages. Between the card and the comber, there must be an even number of passages, and there must be an odd number between the card and the ring spinning machine. In rotor spinning, the disposition of the hooks is of little significance.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Volume 1 – Page 29</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;This discussion will be confined to mechanical cleaning, in which usually only particles on the surface of the flocks can be removed.</p>
<p>&ldquo;The following procedures can be used:&rdquo;</p>
<ul>
<li>striking = falling out;</li>
<li>beating = ejecting;</li>
<li>scraping = separation;</li>
<li>suction = separation;</li>
<li>combing = extracting;</li>
<li>use of centrifugal force = ejecting.</li></ul></div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Volume 1 – Page 31</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Cotton contains very little dust before ginning, but working of the material on the machines causes dust. Even where dust is removed, new dust is being created through shattering of impurities and smashing and rubbing of fibers. Formerly, dust was of no great significance for the spinner, but now it poses a problem. &rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Volume 1 – Page 33</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;In addition, a distinction must also be made between controlled and uncontrolled blending. In uncontrolled blending, the components are brought together at random and without a mixing system (e.g. often in bale mixing). In controlled blending, the individual components are supplied to the machines in an ordered fashion and precisely metered (e.g. in weighing-hopper feeders). The various blending processes often differ widely from one another with respect to capital cost, labor-intensiveness, precision of blending, liability to error, and simplicity. Each method has advantages and disadvantages. It is therefore not possible to put forward patent recipes for the use of one or another blending principle.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Volume 1 – Page 36</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;<span style="width: 200px; display: table" class=" align-right"><span class="auto-content-inline"><a href="https://www.earthli.com/data/news/attachments/entry/4620/s_and_z.png"><img src="https://www.earthli.com/data/news/attachments/entry/4620/s_and_z_tn.png" alt=" " style="width: 200px"></a></span><span class="auto-content-caption"><a href="https://www.earthli.com/data/news/attachments/entry/4620/s_and_z.png">Fig 56. Twist directions in spun and twisted yarns</a></span></span>Twist is produced with the aid of spindles, rotors, rollers, and so on. Since two twist directions, left and right, are always possible, the fiber windings can also have two directions. The direction of the twist is indicated as Z- or S-twist depending on the transverse orientation of the fibers, i.e. the orientation relative to the diagonals of the letters Z and S (Fig. 56). Z-twist is normally used in short staple spinning, though not to the exclusion of S-twist.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Volume 1 – Page 53</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;The volume of rejects if anything goes wrong at any production unit in the mill is equally high. More than ever the following slogan is valid: </p>
<p>&ldquo;FAULTS SHOULD BE AVOIDED, NOT CORRECTED</p>
<p>&ldquo;Meeting this requirement calls not only for competent quality management, but also for an overall control, monitoring and information system with control devices at all relevant points of the material through-flow, either individual or group-wise. &rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Volume 1 – Page 73</div></div><h3><span id="vol2">Volume 2 – Blowroom &amp; Carding</span></h3><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The importance of carding is even greater where new spinning systems are concerned. The considerable influence of the card on yarn quality arises from the very complex series of events in the process itself, and also from the pressure to adopt an extremely high production rate on economic grounds. This high production rate causes problems, since there is a close relationship between increases in production and reductions in quality:&rdquo;<ul>
<li>the higher the performance, the more sensitive the carding operation becomes</li>
<li>and the greater the danger of a negative influence on quality.</li></ul><p>&ldquo;[…]</p>
<p>&ldquo;While in the case of an easy-to-clean cotton, for example, the blowroom line might assume most of the working load required, for hard-to-clean cotton this might be done by the card.</p>
<p>&ldquo;[…]</p>
<p>&ldquo;Elimination of foreign matter occurs mainly but not exclusively in the region of the licker-in. Only a small part of the contaminants is carried along with the flat strippings, or falls out at other positions. The degree of cleaning achieved by the modern card is very high, in the range of 80 − 95 %. Thus, the overall degree of cleaning achieved by the blowroom and the carding room together is as high as 95 − 99 %. But carded sliver still contains 0.05 − 0.3 % of foreign matter.</p>
<p>&ldquo;[…]</p>
<p>&ldquo;Both are available on the card to a considerable degree, i.e. the card is a good dust removing machine.&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Volume 2 – Page 51</div></div><h3><span id="vol3">Volume 3 – Spinning Preparation</span></h3><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The comber is used in the production of medium, mediumfine and fine yarns, and enables a positive influence to be exerted primarily on the yarn characteristics of:&rdquo;<ul>
<li>evenness;</li>
<li>strength;</li>
<li>cleanliness;</li></ul>&ldquo;and on the fabric characteristics of:&rdquo;<ul>
<li>smoothness;</li>
<li>visual appearance; and</li>
<li>handle.</li></ul>&ldquo;It is also employed to improve working behavior in downstream processing, most noticeably in knitting. In addition, yarn made from combed cotton needs less twist than a carded yarn.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Volume 3 – Page 11</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;The drawframe produces a sliver that already exhibits all the characteristics required for the creation of a yarn, namely an ordered, clean strand of fibers laying parallel to one another. It is a fair question to ask why this sliver is not used as infeed material for the ring spinning machine, instead of being processed in an expensive manner to create a roving as feed material for spinning. The roving machine itself is complicated, liable to faults, causes defects, adds to production costs and delivers a product that is sensitive in both winding and unwinding. Use of the machine is forced upon the spinner as a necessary evil for two principal reasons.</p>
<p>&ldquo;The first reason is related to the required draft. Sliver is a thick, untwisted strand that tends to be hairy and to create fly. The draft needed to convert this to a yarn is in the region of 300 − 500. The drafting arrangements of ring spinning machines, in their current forms, are not capable of processing this strand in a single drafting operation to create a yarn of short-staple fibers that meets all the normal<br>
demands on such yarns. The fine, twisted roving is significantly better suited to this purpose.</p>
<p>&ldquo;The second reason is that drawframe cans represent the worst conceivable mode of transport and presentation of feed material to the ring spinning frame. In spite of this, considerable effort has been expended over decades to eliminate the roving frame.</p>
<p>&ldquo;[…]</p>
<p>&ldquo;The chief task of the roving frame is the attenuation of the sliver. Since the resulting fine strand has scarcely any coherence, protective twist must be inserted in order to hold it together. The third task cannot be directly attributed to spinning: it lies in winding the roving into a package that can be transported, stored and donned on the ring spinning machine. It is the winding operation above all that makes the roving frame a relatively complex and problem-plagued machine. This winding operation requires, in addition to spindle and flyer, a cone drive (or variable transmission), a differential<br>
gear and a package build motion.&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Volume 3 – Page 57</div></div><h3><span id="vol4">Volume 4 – Ring Spinning</span></h3><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The degree of automation has also been increased significantly. As this process of evolution is not yet complete, the ring spinning machine will continue to be the most widely used spinning process in short staple spinning, since it has considerable advantages over the new spinning processes:&rdquo;<ul>
<li>it can be used universally, i.e. any material and any yarn</li>
<li>count can be spun on it;</li>
<li>it produces yarn with optimum properties (especially as regards structure and tenacity);</li>
<li>it is uncomplicated and easy to control;</li>
<li>know-how for handling the machine is old, well established and accessible to everyone;</li>
<li>it is flexible with regard to volume (blend and batch sizes).</li></ul><p>&ldquo;[…]</p>
<p>&ldquo;<span style="width: 200px; display: table" class=" align-right"><span class="auto-content-inline"><a href="https://www.earthli.com/data/news/attachments/entry/4620/ring_spinning_costs.png"><img src="https://www.earthli.com/data/news/attachments/entry/4620/ring_spinning_costs_tn.png" alt=" " style="width: 200px"></a></span><span class="auto-content-caption"><a href="https://www.earthli.com/data/news/attachments/entry/4620/ring_spinning_costs.png">Fig. 2–Cost Structure in a typical ring-spinning mill</a></span></span>However, the ring spinning machine can only hold its own position in the long run if the ring spinning process can be automated further and spinning costs substantially reduced, since this machine is a major cost factor in a spinning mill, as the graph produced by Rieter shows (Fig. 2).&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Volume 4 – Page 11</div></div><div class=" clear-both"><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;In the case of the cropped ring the arc was flattened on top compared with the rings that were customary until then. This resulted in a large space for yarn passage, so that the arc of the ring traveler could also be flattened off (oval traveler/flat traveler) and the center of gravity lowered. Its advantage over the anti-wedge ring is that the space for yarn passage is rather larger and all customary ring travelers with the exception of the elliptical traveler can be mounted on it. This is the most widely used ring shape nowadays and is supplied by all well-known companies, such as Bräcker, Reiners &amp; Fürst, etc.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Volume 4 – Page 27</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Automation replaces human activity with processes performed by machines, apparatus or electronics. In terms of cost accounting this substitutes capital costs for labor costs. Automation is therefore worthwhile wherever&rdquo;<ul>
<li>lots of manual work has to be done;</li>
<li>manual work is monotonous or ergonomically unsuitable;</li>
<li>personnel are scarce;</li>
<li>the human error factor has to be eliminated.</li></ul>&ldquo;Since ring spinning accounts for some 50 % of labor costs in a spinning mill, this department is an obvious candidate for automation. However, if we look at the machine itself, it soon becomes obvious that automation is not easy to achieve, since it involves a huge number of tiny production components in a small space with poor accessibility. Even if one or other of these could be automated, it is often uneconomical. Certain operations will therefore have to continue to be performed manually in future.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Volume 4 – Page 43</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;During automatic doffing with old doffing systems the process is interrupted once or twice for tours of inspection. Personnel need to check that the process is proceeding correctly, and especially to ensure that tubes have been fitted everywhere and are not jammed. These tours of inspection are no longer necessary on good modern doffing systems, since each spinning position is continuously monitored during doffing, and collisions between tubes and spindles or cops are therefore impossible. After doffing is completed, the doffer returns to its idle position below the spindles. At the same time the ring rail rises to the piecing position, the balloon checking rings move upward and the yarn guide flaps tilt downward. The machine starts. The conveyor belt moves the doffed cops toward the end of the machine, where they are discharged into transport trolleys or individually transferred directly to the winder. Duration of automatic doffing can be as short as 2 minutes.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Volume 4 – Page 48</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Despite the high degree of perfection of ring spinning, the ring spinning process has not yet achieved ideal performance. The schematic view of the yarn formation zone on the left in Fig. 72 illustrates the problem. The drafting system of a conventional ring spinning machine unfortunately delivers the fibers over a width W which is considerably larger than width WS of the adjacent spinning triangle (see also Fig. 84). This means that some edge fibers are lost or attached in a disorderly configuration to the yarn core already twisted. In other words, today’s ring yarns have a structure that is not nearly as ideal as might be supposed.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Volume 4 – Page 57</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;<span style="width: 227px; display: table" class=" align-left"><span class="auto-content-inline"><a href="https://www.earthli.com/data/news/attachments/entry/4620/fig._82--spining_geometry_angles_and_dimensions.png"><img src="https://www.earthli.com/data/news/attachments/entry/4620/fig._82--spining_geometry_angles_and_dimensions.png" alt=" " style="width: 227px"></a></span><span class="auto-content-caption"><a href="https://www.earthli.com/data/news/attachments/entry/4620/fig._82--spining_geometry_angles_and_dimensions.png">Fig. 82–Spinning geometry angles and dimensions</a></span></span>&rdquo;<pre class=" ">Captions for Fig. 82:
D Drafting system
Z Cylinder support
E Spinning path
F Yarn guide eyelet
B Balloon checking ring
R Ring rail
S Spindle
α Angle of drafting system relative to horizontal
β Angle of drafting system relative to spinning path axis
γ Angle of the thread on the spinning path relative to the vertical
δ Angle of the leg of the thread balloon relative to the spindle axis
lB Balloon height (variable)
lG Distance between drafting system and thread guide eyelet (variable)
lF Distance between thread guide eyelet and top of spindle or tube
(variable)
lS Spindle height
lK Tube height
lH Traverse height of the ring rail (winding height)
lR Distance between ring and balloon checking ring (variable)
dH Outside diameter of the tube at the top
V Overhang of the top front roller relative to the bottom roller</pre></div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Volume 4 – Page 61</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Yarn formation takes place in the spinning triangle. If the yarn is to have high strength, high elongation and regularity combined with low neppiness and hairiness, the fibers in the yarn must be:&rdquo;<ul>
<li>well oriented</li>
<li>evenly distributed in length and cross-section</li>
<li>wound spirally around the axis, and</li>
<li>all fibers must be tied in under tension.</li></ul>&ldquo;Of all the spinning systems available or known, these requirements are best satisfied by ring spinning, especially with regard to the last, very important item. However, this holds true only in conjunction with good spinning geometry, i.e. with an optimal spinning triangle. If it is too short, core fibers (F) will be tied in without tension. They can then absorb tensile forces in the axial direction only to a limited extent, or only after thefibers in the outer layer (f) have been broken. Since the distribution of tension forces in the final yarn is similarly uneven to that in the spinning triangle, the yarn shows the same effect. When stress is applied to the yarn, the edge fibers undergo so much elongation from the very beginning that the forces acting on them either cause the fibers to break, or in some cases to slide apart before the loading forces can act on the neighboring fibers inside the yarn&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Volume 4 – Page 64</div></div><h3><span id="vol5">Volume 5 – Rotor Spinning</span></h3><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;Rotor spinning has been characterized from the outset by incomparably higher production potential than ring spinning. This potential has been steadily  increased by the continuous rise in rotor and winding speeds. Rotor-spun yarns have therefore always been successful where they could be manufactured more cheaply than ring-spun yarns and proved suitable for the range of application in question. Rotor spinning combines two process stages – spinning and winding – in a single machine.</p>
<p>&ldquo;[…]</p>
<p>&ldquo;Last but not least, the rotor spinning system has benefited from the fact that operator functions on the rotor spinning machine were much easier to automate than those on the ring spinning machine. Automation of all operator functions is now standard on high-performance rotor spinning machines, automated can and package transport is already an essential feature in many textile mills.&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Volume 5 – Page 11</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;Rotor spinning was the first process that was capable of producing a cross-wound package ready for processing or sale in a single process stage from a draw frame sliver. Roving frames and winders could be dispensed with; there was thus a significant incentive from the very outset to utilize this process, despite the higher cost of a rotor spinning position compared with a ring spinning position.</p>
<p>&ldquo;[…]</p>
<p>&ldquo;The rotor spinning machine is unlike any other machine in the short staple spinning mill in the range of tasks it has to perform, namely all the basic operations:&rdquo;</p>
<ul>
<li>Sliver feed: A card or draw frame sliver is fed through a sliver guide via a feed roller and feed table to a rapidly rotating opening roller.</li>
<li>Sliver opening: The rotating teeth of the opening roller comb out the individual fibers from the sliver clamped between feed table and feed roller. After leaving the rotating opening roller, the fibers are fed to the fiber channel.</li>
<li>Fiber transport to the rotor: Centrifugal forces and a vacuum in the rotor housing cause the fibers to disengage at a certain point from the opening roller and to move via the fiber channel to the inside wall of the rotor.</li>
<li>Fiber collection in the rotor groove: The centrifugal forces in the rapidly rotating rotor cause the fibers</li>
<li>to move from the conical rotor wall toward the rotor groove and be collected there to form a fiber ring.</li>
<li>Yarn formation: When a spun yarn end emerges from the draw-off nozzle into the rotor groove, it receives twist from the rotation of the rotor outside the nozzle, which then continues in the yarn into the interior of the rotor. The yarn end rotates around its axis and continuously twists-in the fibers deposited in the rotor groove, assisted by the nozzle, which acts as a twist retaining element.</li>
<li>Yarn take-off, winding: The yarn formed in the rotor is continuously taken off by the delivery shaft and the pressure roller through the nozzle and the draw-off tube and wound onto a cross-wound package. Between takeoff and package, several sensors control yarn movement as well as the quality of the yarn and initiate yarn clearing if any pre-selected values are exceeded.</li></ul></div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Volume 5 – Page 14–15</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;Cotton dust (finishing abrasion in the case of man-made fibers) is also extracted through this opening. Fine dust therefore does not accumulate in the rotor groove, and yarn characteristics and yarn values remain stable.</p>
<p>&ldquo;[…]</p>
<p>&ldquo;The rotors, acting as fiber collecting and at the same time twist inserting elements, are the most important and also the most complex components in yarn formation (Fig. 16). As already mentioned, in addition to yarn formation in the rotor groove, the fibers fed in are also separated from the transport air in the rotor, this air being dispersed either over the rotor wall (systems with indirect rotor bearing) or through holes in the base of the rotor (systems with direct rotor bearing).&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Volume 5 – Page 24</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;The fact that rotor-spun yarns contain significantly fewer yarn defects than ring-spun yarns has made a major contribution to the success of the rotor spinning system. A comparison of Uster Statistics shows that the numbers of thick places, thin places and neps are significantly below the level of ring-spun yarns, even at delivery speeds that are up to 10 times higher. And the finer the yarn counts, the greater the differences.</p>
<p>&ldquo;[…]</p>
<p>&ldquo;This was also a major reason why rotor-spun yarns could for many years be processed further without cleaning. However, today‘s quality standards no longer permit this; quality requirements for rotor-spun yarns have increased considerably. For example, manufacturers of branded denim products (jeans, shirts, etc.) stipulate precise specifications for yarn and fabric quality which are so strictly formulated that only quality-tested yarns can be considered for processing.&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Volume 5 – Page 41</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;Automation in rotor spinning in particular is very far advanced – at least in comparison to other spinning processes – not only in respect of machine automation as such (i.e. rotor cleaning, repairing ends down, transporting empty tubes, package change), but also as regards process-linking automation of material transport from the card through the draw frame(s) to the rotor spinning machine up to fully automated package removal or palletizing at the machine itself. Systems for automated material transport between card and draw frame and between the individual draw frame passages will not be dealt with here. You will find details of this in the relevant publications in this series of textbooks.</p>
<p>&ldquo;[…]</p>
<p>&ldquo;Systems for automating the operation of rotor spinning machines have been integral parts of high-performance rotor spinning machines for some years. Automated systems have been developed for all manual operations in several stages:&rdquo;</p>
<ul>
<li>automatic gripping and introduction of the sliver end from a new can into the spinning box (implemented only in certain cases to date);</li>
<li>automatic cleaning of rotor, draw-off nozzle and draw-off tube after ends down, quality stops or package changes;</li>
<li>automatic piecing (start-up) after ends down, quality stops or package changes;</li>
<li>automatic removal of full packages upon reaching the preset yarn length, and replacement with empty tubes;</li>
<li>automatic feeding of empty tubes to the operating robot for package change;</li>
<li>programmable batch phase-out/batch change;</li>
<li>automatic deposit of removed packages at the end of the machine;</li>
<li>automatic or semi-automatic filter cleaning</li></ul></div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Volume 5 – Page 45</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;After an end down or package change the interrupted spinning process at the spinning position in question has to be re-started. In terms of spinning technology this entails overlapping a thread end that has been fed back with the fiber ring in the rotor groove. The quality of such a piecing is just as important as the quality of the yarn itself, since both determine its market value to a great extent. The quality of a piecing is defined essentially by:&rdquo;<ul>
<li>the tenacity of the piecing expressed as a percentage of yarn tenacity;</li>
<li>the variation in tenacity between the piecings (CV% of piecing tenacity);</li>
<li>the thickness of the piecing (diameter or mass);</li>
<li>the length of the piecing;</li>
<li>the repeat accuracy of the piecing.</li></ul></div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Volume 5 – Page 48</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;The reason for this is that sliver intake speed is very low at high drafts, and the individual fibers therefore spend longer in the opening roller zone before being<br>
released from the fiber bundle that has been fed in. Fiber neps are opened more thoroughly, while dust and trash are more effectively released and removed from the fibers.</p>
<p>&ldquo;[…]</p>
<p>&ldquo;In contrast to ring spinning, twisting during rotor spinning takes place from the inside outwards. The rotating, brush-like open yarn end first catches fibers in the core and then with further rotation gradually takes up fibers toward the periphery. In the interior, where the fibers cannot avoid the twist, the fibers become more compact. On the other hand, toward the exterior, the compactness falls off to an increasing degree, since here the fibers are able partially to avoid being twisted in. In addition to the fiber-specific properties (fiber strength, elongation, length, friction, etc.), yarn tenacity depends primarily on how often the yarn has been rotated around its axis.&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Volume 5 – Page 80</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;Raw materials behave differently not only as regards their readiness to absorb moisture, their running properties are also affected by humidity levels in the spinning mill. Since the raw material spends several days in the spinning mill on its way through the spinning process, the moisture content of the fibers depends on the moisture content of the ambient air.</p>
<p>&ldquo;[…]</p>
<p>&ldquo;If relative humidity is too low, this usually becomes apparent with man-made fibers in electrostatic charging and a consequent increase in ends down. When cotton is being processed, fiber damage, fiber fly and deposits in the spinning box and winding zones occur.</p>
<p>&ldquo;If relative humidity is too high, this results in lapping on cylinders and opening rollers with all fibers. The spin finish on man-made fibers tends to leave deposits on thread guide elements and in the fiber guide channel, thus obstructing fiber transport to the rotor. This then results in an increase in the number of neps and thick places.&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Volume 5 – Page 84</div></div><h3><span id="vol6">Volume 6 – Alternative Spinning Systems</span></h3><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;In open-end spinning, this flow of fibers is interrupted, the fiber strand being opened into individual fibers at a predetermined position, usually by means of an opening roller, followed by airborne fiber transport. This interruption or break in the fiber flow is physically achieved by increasing fiber speed locally to very high levels (up to 100 m/s), so that – according to the equation of continuity – the number of fibers in the cross-section drops to such low values that the fibers lose contact with each other. This enables twist to be imparted merely by rotation of the yarn end, which in turn leads to a significantly higher potential rotation speed. However, the break in fiber flow also leads directly to one of the most important and difficult tasks in open-end spinning, namely to control the configuration of the individual fibers, airborne at high speed, and the need to re-collect these fibers without losing their elongated configuration, which is essential to the formation of a new fiber strand. This very tricky problem of open-end spinning can be dealt with schematically as described below.</p>
<p>&ldquo;[…]</p>
<p>&ldquo;Several research teams, including some in the former Soviet Union, have investigated the possibilities of forming fiber strands with the aid of electrostatic fields. However, only the process proposed by the Battelle Institute has had a degree of success. <strong>The Electrospin Corporation (USA)</strong> demonstrated an experimental spinning machine based on this principle at the 1971 ITMA in Paris.&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Volume 6 – Page 15</div></div><p>I&rsquo;m pretty sure that this is the company that Zellweger bought and which is now UTUS.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><span style="width: 889px; display: table"><span class="auto-content-inline"><a href="https://www.earthli.com/data/news/attachments/entry/4620/process_differences_in_strength_and_price.png"><img src="https://www.earthli.com/data/news/attachments/entry/4620/process_differences_in_strength_and_price.png" alt=" " style="width: 889px"></a></span><span class="auto-content-caption"><a href="https://www.earthli.com/data/news/attachments/entry/4620/process_differences_in_strength_and_price.png">Process differences in strength and price</a></span></span></div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Volume 6 – Page 55</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;This results in specific fields of application for the different processes. On the basis of simplicity, yarn quality and universality, ring spinning, together with the increasingly important compact spinning process, will remain the dominant spinning process in the long term. Rotor spinning will certainly continue to display its strengths in medium to coarse yarn counts, and maintain its market share. Air-jet spinning will win specific application fields in the medium count range at the partial expense of ring spinning and rotor spinning.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Volume 6 – Page 56</div></div><h3><span id="vol7">Volume 7 – Processing of Man-Made Fibres</span></h3><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;The story of „man-made fibres“ goes far back into the 17th century and in this volume is also briefly revisited. The original drive for the development of man-made fibres was to replace cotton and thus the complicated process from the fibre to the yarn. An artificial endless thread, initially following the example of silk, was the dream.</p>
<p>&ldquo;[…]</p>
<p>&ldquo;In 2013, around 24 million tons of cotton were still processed – far more than half the processed staple fibres of approx. 44 million tons. Cotton is therefore still a very important raw material and this not only for the textile industry but also for the social and industrial development of numerous countries.&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Volume 7 – Page 7</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The polymer is fed to the spinning nozzle as a hot molten material. The extruded filaments are cooled by an air stream in the cooling duct so that they can be coiled in carts without sticking together as a bundle […]&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Volume 7 – Page 15</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Natural fibres are mostly more or less strongly crimped or looped. Usually, man-made fibres must also be crimped. The crimp can be permanent or temporary, i.e. set, partially set, or onset. Set crimp is selected in order to achieve certain characteristics in the end product, such as:&rdquo;<ul>
<li>a full, bulked, soft feel, and</li>
<li>high insulating capacity.</li></ul></div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Volume 7 – Page 23</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;A high lateral strength can be an advantage or a disadvantage depending upon the field of use (see Fig. 23). In general, high lateral strength gives good durability to the finished articles; this is very important in technical applications, in working clothes and uniform fabrics and also in floor coverings. However, the pilling tendency also increases so that in the civilian clothing sector only limited use is made of fibres with high lateral strength. This applies especially in relation to knitted goods, where the individual fibres are not so strongly anchored; for example, polyester fibre must be deliberately made brittle for use in knitted products to avoid pilling (anti-pilling types).&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Volume 7 – Page 26</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;Depending upon their field of use, fibres with a higher or lower moisture take-up will be required, e.g. high – hand towels, underclothing; low − bathing costumes.</p>
<p>&ldquo;In relation to clothing, however, it is not only the moisture take-up that is important but also the ability to transport moisture and wettability. Both properties have a strong influence on wearability. They depend upon fibre surface area and the capillary effect on the fabric. Thus, although PES has a low moisture take-up, good moisture transport can be reached by means of appropriate apparel design (Table 3)&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Volume 7 – Page 27</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;Polyamide and polyester fibres are relatively difficult to ignite. Nevertheless, they have the serious disadvantage that the fibre substance melts and drips; in some circumstances, the result of this behavior can be far more serious for humans and the environment than in the case of cellulose. Of all normal fibres, wool has the most favorable burning characteristics. It is fairly difficult to ignite, and, after burning, it leaves a brittle, rapidly cooling residue that does not<br>
adhere to adjoining surfaces.&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Volume 7 – Page 28</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Charge accumulations on the fibres and on the machines often have different signs. The machine components therefore tend to attract individual fibres or even whole strands. This leads to formation of laps, catching of fibres, blockages, etc., especially on cylinders, in clothings and in guide ducts. Falling apart of strands is caused by all fibres in the strand having the same charge and therefore tending to repel each other. In minor cases, this causes spreading out of the edge fibres; in extreme cases, the strand disintegrates.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Volume 7 – Page 33</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;In general man-made fibre material is free from impurities;  however, depending on the supplier or process it is possible that fibre packages, melted together fibres can occur. These need to be removed and this can be done at the licker-in with the mote knife. In the Rieter C 70 card, the mote knife can be adjusted during production. Fig. 32 shows the knife almost closed as it would be recommended for man-made fibres (left) in comparison to a very open knife position for a high cleaning efficiency when running 100 % cotton.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Volume 7 – Page 41</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;When spinning sliver-blended polyester/cotton blends with ring spinning machines, a total of three drawing passages including the blending draw frame is needed to fulfill the highest quality standards. In contrast, when spinning the same material by rotor spinning technology two drawing passages are enough. In rotor spinning the fed sliver is completely opened to single fibres which ensure fibre/fibre mixing and additionally a lower number of draw frame passages is required.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Volume 7 – Page 43</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><span style="width: 912px; display: table"><span class="auto-content-inline"><a href="https://www.earthli.com/data/news/attachments/entry/4620/examples_for_different_nubers_of_drawframe_passages.png"><img src="https://www.earthli.com/data/news/attachments/entry/4620/examples_for_different_nubers_of_drawframe_passages.png" alt=" " style="width: 912px"></a></span><span class="auto-content-caption"><a href="https://www.earthli.com/data/news/attachments/entry/4620/examples_for_different_nubers_of_drawframe_passages.png">Examples for different numbers of drawframe passages</a></span></span></div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Volume 7 – Page 44</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Like the roller settings in the draw frame, the roller settings at the roving frame have to be adjusted according to the fibre length. Settings which are too narrow cause fibre damage, while settings which are too wide increase the number of floating fibres and result in higher unevenness of the roving. The break draft distance is an important parameter for the roving quality. The optimum setting is not only influenced by the fibre length but also by the drafting resistance of the fibre material. The higher the drafting resistance the higher the break draft roller setting has to be used.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Volume 7 – Page 49</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The traveler speed is the most important limiting factor regarding production speeds on a ring spinning machine. In comparison to spinning cotton, the maximum traveler speed for spinning man-made fibres or blends has to be reduced. Higher traveler speeds increase the risk of thermal damage of the fibres which is described in chapter 5.9.2.. Thus, manufacturers of man-made fibres usually suggest maximum traveler speeds of 28 to 30 m/s. When processing fibres with a low melting point such as polypropylene or low-pill fibre types, a further decrease of the maximum traveler speeds well below 28 m/s is necessary. When spinning blends, the risk of thermal damage of the fibres can be ignored&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Volume 7 – Page 53</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;Problems in the ring spinning process with man-made<br>
fibres can be caused by:&rdquo;</p>
<ul>
<li>the fibres</li>
<li>the machine</li>
<li>the roving</li>
<li>the air conditioning.</li></ul>&ldquo;Problems caused by the fibres can arise from:&rdquo;<ul>
<li>poor spin finish (high fibre/fibre adherence, smearing)</li>
<li>low plasticizing point (this is the main cause and it leads rapidly to thermal damage).</li></ul></div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Volume 7 – Page 56</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;The maximum possible rotor speed that can be used for a given man-made fibre material is influenced by the material itself (e.g. polyester, viscose, etc.), by the quality of the fibres and by the spin finish (e.g. high performance types, normal types, etc.). In general, blends with cotton can be spun faster than pure man-made fibres and viscose can be spun faster than polyester or polyacryl. For example, it is possible to spin high quality viscose with rotor speeds up to 130 000 rpm [13].</p>
<p>&ldquo;The maximum speed that can be achieved has to be determined by spinning trials. It has to be kept in mind that the higher the rotor speed and the smaller the rotor diameter are, the higher the number of wrapper fibres will be and the harsher the feel of the finished fabrics will become.&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Volume 7 – Page 61</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;Steaming is treatment with water vapor at temperatures below 100 °C. Steaming serves to reduce twist liveliness of both singles and plied yarns.</p>
<p>&ldquo;Stabilization is treatment with steam at temperatures above 100 °C. Stabilization is carried out to reduce shrinkage of staple-fibre yarns for package and warpbeam dyeing.&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Volume 7 – Page 70</div></div>      </div>
      </div>
        <div class="footer">
    <div class="footer-data"><div class="footer-links"><ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/contact.php" title="">Contact</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/support.php" title="">Support</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/privacy.php" title="">Privacy</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/rights.php" title="">Rights</a></li></ul></div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="copyright">Copyright (c) 1999-2026 earthli.com. All Rights Reserved.</div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="versions">Powered by <ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore/app_news.php">earthli News 3.7</a></li><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore" title="">earthli WebCore&trade; 3.7</a></li></ul></div></div>    </div>
      </div>
  </div>  </body>
</html>
]]>
  </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
      <title type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[The Last Wish: Introducing the Witcher (The Witcher Saga Book 1) by Andrzej Sapkowski (pl: 1993; en: 2007) (read in 2022)]]>
  </title>
    <id>https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=4623</id>
    <link href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=4623"/>
    <updated>2023-02-02T20:05:58+01:00</updated>
    <author>
        <name type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[Marco von Ballmoos]]>
  </name>
      <uri>https://earthli.com/users/marco</uri>
    </author>
      <summary type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<p><small class="notes">Standard disclaimer [1]</small></p>
<p><a href="https://www.earthli.com/data/news/attachments/entry/4623/andrzej_sapkowski_-_the_last_wish.jpg"><img src="https://www.earthli.com/data/news/attachments/entry/4623/andrzej_sapkowski_-_the_last_wish_tn.jpg" alt=" " class=" align-left"></a>This is the first book featuring the Witcher, a magically gifted, preternaturally physically gifted, and potion-enhanced monster-hunter. He wields a silver sword, pulled quickly from a sheath on his back. His hair is long and silver, his eyes jet black. His eyes match his... [<a class="complete-text-link" href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=4623">More</a>]</p>
]]>
  </summary>
      <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<html lang="en">
  <head>
    <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/themes/ice.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/fonts/raleway.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/core/medium.css">
  </head>
  <body>
<div class="style-controls">  <div class="page">
    <div class="page-body">
<div class="info-box-top">
<p>
Published by <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_user.php?name=marco" title="Marco von Ballmoos" class="visible">marco</a> on <span class="date-time">2. Feb 2023 20:05:58 (GMT-5)</span>
</p>
</div>
      <div class="text-flow wide">
  <p><small class="notes">Standard disclaimer [1]</small></p>
<p><a href="https://www.earthli.com/data/news/attachments/entry/4623/andrzej_sapkowski_-_the_last_wish.jpg"><img src="https://www.earthli.com/data/news/attachments/entry/4623/andrzej_sapkowski_-_the_last_wish_tn.jpg" alt=" " class=" align-left"></a>This is the first book featuring the Witcher, a magically gifted, preternaturally physically gifted, and potion-enhanced monster-hunter. He wields a silver sword, pulled quickly from a sheath on his back. His hair is long and silver, his eyes jet black. His eyes match his head-to-toe leather armor, studded with spikes along the shoulders. The ladies love him; his enemies fear him. He knows lore; he is good with animals. He is wise and bides his time. He is a bad-ass, an excellent fighter. He is a traveler of lands far and wide.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;During his life, the witcher had met thieves who looked like town councilors, councilors who looked like beggars, harlots who looked like princesses, princesses who looked like calving cows and kings who looked like thieves.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 81</div></div><p>The framing story is that he is resting after having been injured in a monster battle. During his convalescence, he reminisces about seven recent events. These stories form the basis of what would be become the Witcher Saga. We meet Ciri&rsquo;s grandmother Calanthe and her mother Pavetta. We meet Yennefer of Vengerberg. We meet Dandelion the troubadour. We meet Dennis Cranmer, the dwarf captain. They will all figure in the books that follow.</p>
<dl><dt>&ldquo;The Witcher&rdquo; (<em>Wiedźmin</em>)</dt>
<dd>In the first story, Geralt takes up the challenge laid down by Foltest, the king of Temeria. The king has offered a reward to anyone who can lift the curse on his daughter Adda. She is a striga, a creature that prowls at night with otherworldly power, preying on humans. She must spend the night in her crypt in order to survive. Geralt traps her outside of the vault and cures her, but she&rsquo;s still feral and claws him. He survives and gets his reward.</dd>
<dt>&ldquo;A Grain of Truth&rdquo; (<em>Ziarno prawdy</em>)</dt>
<dd><div class=" "><p>Geralt happens upon a manor belonging to a bear-like, tusked creature who is not a monster, but a misbegotten man named Nivellen. He entertains Geralt with stories of his love conquests, which he&rsquo;d purchased with the massive hoard of wealth in his basement. Nivellen lives with his latest love, the shy Vereena, who does not show up for Geralt. Nivellen suspects that she may not be … human. She is a bruxa who&rsquo;s been preying on victims that Nivellen unwitting brought to her. She attacks Geralt, getting the better of him, but failing to watch her flank. Nivellen reluctantly impales her. Before she dies, she professes her love for him, curing his affliction.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Slowly, as if a caress, the bruxa moved her tiny hands along the stake, stretched her arms out to their full length, grasped the pole hard and pulled on it again. Over a meter of bloodied wood already protruded from her back. Her eyes were wide open, her head flung back. Her sighs became more frequent and rhythmic, turning into a ruckling wheeze.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 67</div></div></div></dd>
<dt>&ldquo;The Lesser Evil&rdquo; (Mniejsze zło)</dt>
<dd><div class=" "><p>Geralt heads to a new town with his horse Roach heavily laden with the corpse of a gruesome, dead monster. He seeks someone who&rsquo;s willing to pay for him for having killed it. He is sent to the wizard&rsquo;s tower, where he discovers that his old colleague Stregobor has taken up residence and is in hiding. Stregobor is being chased by a cursed female assassin named Renfri. Geralt meets with and sleeps with Renfri, even after failing to convince her to give up her mission.</p>
<p>She and her henchmen threaten to kill everyone in the town of Blaviken if they do not give up Stregobor. Geralt cannot allow it and, instead, kills them all, including, finally, Renfri. Geralt prevents Stregobor from performing an autopsy to &ldquo;prove&rdquo; that Renfri had been afflicted by some curse or other. The townspeople, having known nothing of the threat to their lives, run Geralt out of town for having murdered a whole group of people in cold blood.</p>
</div></dd>
<dt>&ldquo;A Question of Price&rdquo; (Kwestia ceny)</dt>
<dd><div class=" "><p>In this story, we meet Queen Calanthe, whose daughter Pavetta is to be married off at a giant party, to which many potential suitors have been invited. They eat, drink, and make merry for a while, telling tales of past conquests.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;“Hochebuz,” said Calanthe, looking at Geralt, “my first battle. Although I fear rousing the indignation and contempt of such a proud witcher, I confess that we were fighting for money. Our enemy was burning villages which paid us levies and we, greedy for our tributes, challenged them on the field. A trivial reason, a trivial battle, a trivial three thousand corpses pecked to pieces by the crows. And look—instead of being ashamed I’m proud as a peacock that songs are sung about me. Even when sung to such awful music.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 128</div></div><p>A mystery knight named Urcheon appears to claim Pavetta&rsquo;s hand. It turns out that Pavetta&rsquo;s father had once promised Urcheon her by the &ldquo;Law of Surprise&rdquo;. Urcheon had asked for that which Pavetta&rsquo;s father did not know he had yet, and it was granted. Pavetta&rsquo;s father returned home to learn that his wife was pregnant with Pavetta. Surprise!</p>
<p>Geralt defends Urcheon—now revealed to be Duny—when he is attacked by the other suitors. Pavetta nearly tears the castle down with her magical powers. Things are sorted out with Pavetta and Duny being paired off and Geralt claiming the Law of Surprise as his reward. It is Pavetta who is pregnant this time, with Duny unknowing. Pavetta&rsquo;s child would be Ciri, which will be important much, much later.</p>
</div></dd>
<dt>&ldquo;The Edge of the World&rdquo; (Kraniec świata)</dt>
<dd><div class=" "><p>Geralt and troubadour Dandelion travel to a far-off village where they discover that it&rsquo;s being terrorized by a deovel. The deovel is actually a sylvan. The village elder says that they must drive the deovel away without killing it. The young girl who accompanies her is silent, but seems to be in charge.</p>
<p>She turns out out be in cahoots not only with Torque (the sylvan), but also a local band of elves, to whom Torque is giving all of the food that he steals. The village has been feeding a starving band of elves, who&rsquo;d been driven in the mountains, far from their forest homes. The elves take Geralt and Dandelion prisoner and treat them poorly, but eventually are shamed into letting them go.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;“He’s simply taking revenge for all the wrong that man has done the elves.” The witcher smiled wryly. “It’s all the same to him who he takes his revenge on. Don’t be deluded by his noble bearing and elaborate speech, Dandelion. He’s no different than the black-eyes who knocked us down. He has to unload his powerless hatred on somebody.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 196</div></div><p>The young girl from the village reveals herself to also be an elf, the leader of them all.</p>
</div></dd>
<dt>&ldquo;The Last Wish&rdquo;  (Ostatnie życzenie)</dt>
<dd><div class=" "><p>Geralt and Dandelion are fishing when they find an urn in the mud by the shore. Dandelion inadvertently releases what he is certain is a genie, but seems more powerful. Geralt manages to banish it with a spoken curse, but is a bit mystified that it went so easily. They travel to a local city, where they learn of Yennefer of Vengerberg (who will also be important later), a sorceress of no insignificant power. She agrees to help them, but they learn that she has plans to use Dandelion as bait to capture the genie and use its power for herself. This proves not to be so easy. It is powerful.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Blood. Blood. Blood. Bones like broken white sticks. Tendons like whitish cords exploding from beneath cracking skin cut by enormous paws bristling with thorns, and sharp teeth. The hideous sound of torn flesh, and shouting—shameless and horrifying in its shamelessness. The shamelessness of the end. Of death. Blood and shouting. Shouting. Blood. Shouting—[…]&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 279</div></div><p>In her mighty struggle with the genie, she learns that it is bound not to Dandelion but to Geralt, who&rsquo;d banished it with his first wish, killed a guard in the local prison with his second—both unwittingly—and uses his last wish to banish it for good. No-one knows what he wished for—well, we all suspect it was something to do with Yenneger—but he managed to save both himself and Yennefer, against all odds.</p>
</div></dd>
<dt>&ldquo;The Voice of Reason&rdquo; (Głos rozsądku)</dt>
<dd>Geralt and Dandelion leave the temple—Geralt having been healed of his injuries—and meet a mixed company of soldiers traveling on the main road, guarding a wagon train of supplies. They are led by Dennis Cranmer, a dwarf. Geralt is forced to partake in a challenge from a human soldier, but manages to trick his way out of it—he gets the soldier to knock himself out with his own sword, making no blows himself. Just Geralt being cool and doing cool stuff. No big deal.</dd>
</dl><p>These stories correspond, more or less, to the first season of the <a href="https://www.imdb.com/title/tt5180504/">Netflix series of the same name</a>.</p>
<p>I very much like Sapkowski&rsquo;s politics and philosophy. There are quite a few places where he, through his characters, paints a sympathetic and balanced picture of what a good world would look like. He seems to recognize and despise the things that are wrong in our world by painting them disparagingly in his own. His writing style is tremendous and poetic and my hat is off many times to the wizardry of the translator. </p>
<p><hr></p>
<div class="footnote-reference"><span id="footnote_DRAFTABLE_ENTRY_4623_1_body" class="footnote-number">[1]</span> Disclaimer: these are notes I took while reading this book. They include citations I found interesting or enlightening or particularly well-written. In some cases, I&rsquo;ve pointed out which of these applies to which citation; in others, I have not. Any benefit you gain from reading these notes is purely incidental to the purpose they serve of reminding me of what I once read. Please see Wikipedia for a summary if I&rsquo;ve failed to provide one sufficient for your purposes. If my notes serve to trigger an interest in this book, then I&rsquo;m happy for you.</div><h2>Citations</h2><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;The witcher halted at a distance of ten paces. His sword, slowly drawn from its black enameled sheath, glistened and glowed above his head</p>
<p>&ldquo;“It’s silver,” he said. “This blade is silver.”</p>
<p>&ldquo;The pale little face did not flinch; the anthracite eyes did not change expression.</p>
<p>&ldquo;“You’re so like a rusalka,” the witcher continued calmly, “that you could deceive anyone. All the more as you’re a rare bird, black-haired one. But horses are never mistaken. They recognize creatures like you instinctively and perfectly. What are you? I think you’re a moola, or an alpor. An ordinary vampire couldn’t come out in the sun.”</p>
<p>&ldquo;The corners of the pale lips quivered and turned up a little.&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 62</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Geralt leapt to the left, executing a short moulinet with his sword to confuse the bruxa gliding toward him—white and black, windblown, terrible. He’d underestimated her. She screamed. He didn’t make the Sign in time, flew backward until he thumped against the wall. The pain in his spine shot all the way to the tips of his fingers, paralyzed his shoulders, cut him down at the legs. He fell to his knees. The bruxa, wailing melodiously, jumped toward him.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 66</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Slowly, as if a caress, the bruxa moved her tiny hands along the stake, stretched her arms out to their full length, grasped the pole hard and pulled on it again. Over a meter of bloodied wood already protruded from her back. Her eyes were wide open, her head flung back. Her sighs became more frequent and rhythmic, turning into a ruckling wheeze.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 67</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;During his life, the witcher had met thieves who looked like town councilors, councilors who looked like beggars, harlots who looked like princesses, princesses who looked like calving cows and kings who looked like thieves.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 81</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;“[…] that’s the way of the world. One sees all sorts of things when one travels. Two peasants kill each other over a field which, the following day, will be trampled flat by two counts and their retinues trying to kill each other off.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 82</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;“Evil is evil, Stregobor,” said the witcher seriously as he got up. “Lesser, greater, middling, it’s all the same. Proportions are negotiated, boundaries blurred. I’m not a pious hermit. I haven’t done only good in my life. But if I’m to choose between one evil and another, then I prefer not to choose at all.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 90</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;“A bit more tolerance, if you please,” said Geralt calmly, “as I see your mother must have wandered off through the forest alone often enough to give you good reason to wonder where you come from yourself.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 93</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Last winter Prince Hrobarik, not being so gracious, tried to hire me to find a beauty who, sick of his vulgar advances, had fled the ball, losing a slipper. It was difficult to convince him that he needed a huntsman, and not a witcher.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 127</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;“Hochebuz,” said Calanthe, looking at Geralt, “my first battle. Although I fear rousing the indignation and contempt of such a proud witcher, I confess that we were fighting for money. Our enemy was burning villages which paid us levies and we, greedy for our tributes, challenged them on the field. A trivial reason, a trivial battle, a trivial three thousand corpses pecked to pieces by the crows. And look—instead of being ashamed I’m proud as a peacock that songs are sung about me. Even when sung to such awful music.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 128</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Tell me, if the implication that your aid was not disinterested does not offend another of your knightly vows, how I can express my gratitude.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 135</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Remember Zivelena, who became the Queen of Metinna with the help of the gnome Rumplestelt, and in return promised him her firstborn? Zivelena didn’t keep her promise when Rumplestelt came for his reward and, by using spells, she forced him to run away. Not long after that, both she and the child died of the plague. You do not dice with Destiny with impunity!”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 140</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;You witchers, after all, deprive yourselves of work, slowly but surely. The better and the more conscientiously you work, the less work there is for you. After all, your goal is a world without monsters, a world which is peaceful and safe. A world where witchers are unnecessary. A paradox, isn’t it?”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 161</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;“He’s simply taking revenge for all the wrong that man has done the elves.” The witcher smiled wryly. “It’s all the same to him who he takes his revenge on. Don’t be deluded by his noble bearing and elaborate speech, Dandelion. He’s no different than the black-eyes who knocked us down. He has to unload his powerless hatred on somebody.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 196</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;“You see, Geralt, this bright sun of ours is still shining, but not quite the way it used to. Read the great books if you like. But if you don’t want to waste time on it, maybe you’ll be happy with the explanation that the crystal roof acts like a filter. It eliminates the lethal rays which are increasingly found in sunlight. That’s why plants which you can’t see growing wild anywhere in the world grow here.”</p>
<p>&ldquo;“I understand.” The witcher nodded. “And us, Nenneke? What about us? The sun shines on us, too. Shouldn’t we shelter under a roof like that?”</p>
<p>&ldquo;“In principle, yes,” sighed the priestess. “But…”</p>
<p>&ldquo;“But what?”</p>
<p>&ldquo;“It’s too late.”&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 213</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;“Your wish,” she whispered, her lips very near his ear. “I don’t know whether such a wish can ever be fulfilled. I don’t know whether there’s such a Force in Nature that could fulfill such a wish. But if there is, then you’ve condemned yourself. Condemned yourself to me.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 268</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Blood. Blood. Blood. Bones like broken white sticks. Tendons like whitish cords exploding from beneath cracking skin cut by enormous paws bristling with thorns, and sharp teeth. The hideous sound of torn flesh, and shouting—shameless and horrifying in its shamelessness. The shamelessness of the end. Of death. Blood and shouting. Shouting. Blood. Shouting—[…]&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 279</div></div>      </div>
      </div>
        <div class="footer">
    <div class="footer-data"><div class="footer-links"><ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/contact.php" title="">Contact</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/support.php" title="">Support</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/privacy.php" title="">Privacy</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/rights.php" title="">Rights</a></li></ul></div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="copyright">Copyright (c) 1999-2026 earthli.com. All Rights Reserved.</div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="versions">Powered by <ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore/app_news.php">earthli News 3.7</a></li><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore" title="">earthli WebCore&trade; 3.7</a></li></ul></div></div>    </div>
      </div>
  </div>  </body>
</html>
]]>
  </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
      <title type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[War is the Greatest Evil by Chris Hedges (2022) (read in 2022)]]>
  </title>
    <id>https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=4614</id>
    <link href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=4614"/>
    <updated>2023-01-31T22:51:22+01:00</updated>
    <author>
        <name type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[Marco von Ballmoos]]>
  </name>
      <uri>https://earthli.com/users/marco</uri>
    </author>
      <summary type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<p><small class="notes">Standard disclaimer [1]</small></p>
<p><a href="https://www.earthli.com/data/news/attachments/entry/4614/war_is_the_greatest_evil.jpg"><img src="https://www.earthli.com/data/news/attachments/entry/4614/war_is_the_greatest_evil_tn.jpg" alt=" " class=" align-right"></a>This is an excellent book. Everyone should read it, but especially every American should read it. It&rsquo;s not an easy read, but neither is it easy to confront the fact that you&rsquo;re part of a monstrous machine that chews up poor people and spits out yachts.</p>
<p>This machine runs on... [<a class="complete-text-link" href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=4614">More</a>]</p>
]]>
  </summary>
      <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<html lang="en">
  <head>
    <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/themes/ice.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/fonts/raleway.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/core/medium.css">
  </head>
  <body>
<div class="style-controls">  <div class="page">
    <div class="page-body">
<div class="info-box-top">
<p>
Published by <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_user.php?name=marco" title="Marco von Ballmoos" class="visible">marco</a> on <span class="date-time">31. Jan 2023 22:51:22 (GMT-5)</span>
</p>
</div>
      <div class="text-flow wide">
  <p><small class="notes">Standard disclaimer [1]</small></p>
<p><a href="https://www.earthli.com/data/news/attachments/entry/4614/war_is_the_greatest_evil.jpg"><img src="https://www.earthli.com/data/news/attachments/entry/4614/war_is_the_greatest_evil_tn.jpg" alt=" " class=" align-right"></a>This is an excellent book. Everyone should read it, but especially every American should read it. It&rsquo;s not an easy read, but neither is it easy to confront the fact that you&rsquo;re part of a monstrous machine that chews up poor people and spits out yachts.</p>
<p>This machine runs on war. It runs on conquest, pillage, and piracy and all that war entails. It not only doesn&rsquo;t care about the overwhelming number of victims of all kinds—those directly killed, those grievously injured, those whose livelihoods are ruined by the shattered societies it leaves in its wake—it just completely fails to acknowledge that they even exist.</p>
<p>Chris Hedges is here to remind you. He is here to awaken you from the hypocritical slumber that engenders the complicity that serves as fuel for the war machine.</p>
<p>Chris Hedges is rarely a ray of sunshine. His writing is almost never funny. He is nearly relentlessly bleak because he writes truth. He does not swerve from his purpose. He wants people to stop fooling themselves and fight the right battles—the real enemy. He sacrifices an ignorant, beckoning bliss for us.</p>
<p>The entire book is a wealth of brilliant writing, expressing different facets of the same thought over and over. He&rsquo;s like a dog gnawing a bone—but it&rsquo;s understandable. The entire concept of war is so horrible that you just can&rsquo;t stop searching for a formulation that will finally convince people to rise up and stop it. He is a much better writer than I—he is a poet in prose—so I use many citations plucked from the long list below to review and describe his book.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;War, in an instant, obliterates homes and communities, all that was once familiar, and leaves behind smoldering ruins and a trauma that you carry for the rest of your life. I have tasted enough of war, enough of my own fear, my body turned to jelly, to know that war is always evil, the purest expression of death, dressed up in patriotic cant about liberty and democracy and sold to the naïve as a ticket to glory, honor, and courage. It is a toxic and seductive elixir. Those who survive, as Kurt Vonnegut wrote, struggle afterwards to “reinvent themselves and their universe,” which, on some level, will never make sense again.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 13</div></div><p>Unlike almost everyone else from whom you&rsquo;ll hear about war in the American media, Chris Hedges personally knows what he&rsquo;s talking about. He describes in vivid and excruciating detail his own experiences in multiple war zones: Serbia, Iraq, Afghanistan, etc. He describes how America&rsquo;s transgressions in its various wars set the low, low bar for complete disregard of human life.</p>
<p>Behind it all are always the same types of people—if not actually the same people—people who fail upward, who, in fact, don&rsquo;t fail at all, not really. While they utterly fail to be moral beings, they succeed spectacularly at aggrandizing power, influence, and lucre to themselves and their coterie of hangers-on. The system protects those who protect it. All it costs is your soul.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;It does not matter how wrong they are, how absurd their theories, how many times they lie or denigrate other cultures and societies as uncivilized or how many murderous military interventions go bad. They are immovable props, the parasitic mandarins of power that are vomited up in the dying days of any empire,&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 32</div></div><blockquote class="quote pullquote align-right right" style="width: 10em"><div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;If truth is the first casualty in war, ambiguity is the second.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 14</div></div></div></blockquote><p>When these people rally the troops, there is no room for interpretation, no room for nuance. Nuance is confusing. Nuance takes time. Three-second sound-bites sell the simple idea that war is good and war is necessary and the enemy is at the gate. It&rsquo;s absolutely depressing how little effort is required to rally most people to the flag, how quickly they forget how disappointed and disgusted they were the last time—often just scant months before—they were rallied in the same manner. They don&rsquo;t question. They just rally. Again and again and again, belying the &ldquo;Sapiens&rdquo; in &ldquo;Homo Sapiens&rdquo;.</p>
<p>In order to direct ire, the mandarins of power choose their victims carefully. There are those who matter and those who do not—&rdquo;worthy victims&rdquo;, as Hedges calls them. This is cynical nearly beyond words, but it is an age-old mantra.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;It is not that worthy victims do not suffer, nor that they are not deserving of our support and compassion; it is that worthy victims alone are rendered human, people like us, and unworthy victims are not.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 22</div></div><p>Any victim is a worthy victim. But to mourn one without the mentioning the other is to become at least implicitly a propaganda tool of one side or the other. People find themselves wholeheartedly agreeing with the country that blows $1T on the military every year—and somehow coincidentally and miraculously finds a war every time, just as the last ones were ending. Railing against Russia in Ukraine without acknowledging the history of the world&rsquo;s largest military power makes you a willing accomplice of the U.S. Be careful how you choose your friends.</p>
<p>These satraps are truly the laziest of sysadmins: they never touch a running system. This vast machine is simple, dumb, inefficient, and outdated, but it produces results reliably—why put in any effort to improve a system that works so well for them? Why would they work harder, when we don&rsquo;t make them? They get everything they want—beyond even their filthiest dreams—all for nearly no effort and no investment. Most of us sell our moral selves so cheaply, it&rsquo;s embarrassing. Our petty rulers never get their comeuppance. We are at least partly to blame.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;I do not know if these people are stupid or cynical or both. They are lavishly funded by the war industry. They are never dropped from the networks for their repeated idiocy. They rotate in and out of power, parked in places like the Council on Foreign Relations or the Brookings Institution, before being called back into government.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 40</div></div><p>He interviews many, many people and tells their stories. Their stories are invariably of the awfulness of war because there is no other story to tell if you&rsquo;ve been in the shit. Some of them are just lost, depressed, and resigned to an existence that will be at least partially miserable until the end of their days. Others manage to be philosophical, to fight back with the power of their minds.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;“I live in a country that is so wealthy we can wage wars and not have to think about them,” Turner said. “It is a pathology handed down from generation to generation. We talk about our military. We use words like ‘heroism.’ But when will we start to care about people whose names are difficult to pronounce? The list of people lost is so vast. How do I write about this and share it in a country that does not want to hear it? […]&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 67</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;War exposes the lies we tell ourselves about ourselves. It rips open the hypocrisy of our religions and secular institutions. Those who return from war have learned something which is often incomprehensible to those who have stayed home. We are not a virtuous nation. God and fate have not blessed us above others. Victory is not assured. War is neither glorious nor noble. And we carry within us the capacity for evil we ascribe to those we fight.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 72</div></div><p>And the Russians tell themselves the exact same ameliorative lies about the intrinsic goodness of their military endeavors, their invasions, their occupations.</p>
<p>Veterans are the ones who know the truth the most. This is why they are also ignored unless they continue to spout empty patriotism. As soon as they are no longer useful for recruitment—or, even worse, become detrimental to recruitment—they are discarded, or persecuted if they persist in their pacifism.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Ask a combat veteran struggling to piece his or her life together about God, and watch the raw vitriol and pain pour out. They have seen into the corrupt heart of America, into the emptiness of its most sacred institutions, into our staggering hypocrisy, and those of us who refuse to heed their words become complicit in the evil they denounce.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 75</div></div><p>As Ann Jones did the same in <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=4538">They Were Soldiers: How the Wounded Return from America’s Wars</a>, Hedges describes what happens to human bodies when confronted with modern military weapons.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Some of the remains had to be scooped up by putting our hands together as though we were cupping water. That was very common. A lot of the deaths were from IEDs or explosions. You might have an upper torso, but you needed to scoop the rest of the remains into a body bag. It was very common to have body bags that when you picked them up, they would sink in the middle because they were filled with flesh.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 86</div></div><p>He talks about what happens to people who aren&rsquo;t lucky enough to die right away.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;“You know, you see a guy who’s paralyzed, and in a wheelchair, and you think he’s just in a wheelchair,” he says in Body of War. “You don’t think about the, you know, the stuff inside that’s paralyzed. I can’t cough because my stomach muscles are paralyzed, so I can’t work up the full coughing energy.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 99</div></div><p>At least if they&rsquo;re injured enough to be obviously physically useless to the military, they&rsquo;ll be left alone, to rot, or … whatever. The military is no longer interested. Woe betide you if the military still thinks you might still be useful to it—then it bends a considerable amount of its will to get you to &ldquo;re-up&rdquo;.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;He became increasingly depressed about his impending deployment to Iraq when he was in basic training at Fort Benning, Georgia. He asked the battalion doctor for antidepressants. The doctor said he had to meet first with the <strong>unit’s chaplain, who told him, “I think you will be happier when you get over to Iraq and start killing Iraqis.”</strong>&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 100</div></div><p>The military is 100% focused on promulgating its own existence. It has no morality, no ethics, it doesn&rsquo;t care why it&rsquo;s fighting. It only knows that it exists to fight, so it will always make sure that there are enough fights to make sure that money, materiel, and soldiers keep flowing in its direction. It is a business. It defends its interests. So do its employees. Even the chaplains, who ostensibly represent a wholesome God, serve one purpose in the military: to help funnel bodies back to the front.</p>
<p>But we don&rsquo;t get to see this version of the war. If we did, we&rsquo;d no longer be able to support it so wholeheartedly.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;If we had to stand over the mangled corpses of the schoolchildren killed in Afghanistan or Ukraine and listen to the wails of their parents, the clichés about liberating the women of Afghanistan or bringing freedom to the Afghan or Ukrainian people would be obscene. Therefore, war is carefully sanitized.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 111</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Honestly examining past wars gives us the ability to understand current wars. But this is a Herculean struggle. The public is fed, and yearns for, the myth. It is empowering and ennobling. It celebrates supposed national virtues and military prowess. It allows an alienated population to feel part of a national collective engaged in a noble crusade. The celebration of the destructive force of our weaponry makes us feel personally empowered. All wars, past and present, are effectively shrouded in this myth.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 122</div></div><p>He concludes with descriptions of the horrors of WWI and WWII.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Only 90 of the 15,000 people originally in the Bochnia ghetto survived the war.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 144</div></div><p>Anyone who pushes for war is, in the words of Kant, a <span class="quote-inline">&ldquo;moral idiot&rdquo;</span>.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;All attempts to control the universe, to play God, to become the arbiters of life and death, have been carried out by moral idiots. They will relentlessly push forward, exploiting and pillaging, perfecting their terrible tools of technology and science, until their creation destroys them and us.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 164</div></div><p>In the final pages, Hedges speaks from his heart, about himself—and offers advice for his readers. It is a plea for them to wake up, to be better, to find their moral core, to stop supporting the most destructive force mankind has ever unleashed, especially so casually, without even seeming to understand what&rsquo;s happening.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;There are days I wish I was whole. I wish I could put down this cross. I envy those who, in their innocence, believe in the innate goodness of America and the righteousness of war, and celebrate what we know is despicable.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 167</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;I cannot impart to you the cheerful and childish optimism that is the curse of America. I can only tell you to stand up, to pick up your cross, to keep moving. I can only tell you that you must always defy the forces that eat away at you, at the nation—this plague of war.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 168</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;All acts of healing and love—and the defiance of war is an affirmation of love—allow us to shout out to the vast powers of the universe that, however broken we are, we are not helpless, however mush we despair, we are not without hope, however weak we may feel, we will always, always, always resist.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 168</div></div><p>Damn, Chris.</p>
<p>That&rsquo;s about right, though. I just spoke with a friend the other night (late November 2022) who said that I was quite cynical about America and that he&rsquo;d rather have America in charge than China or Russia. I was taken aback, but rallied and asked him whether he wasn&rsquo;t the more cynical one, who <em>couldn&rsquo;t imagine a world without a boot on our collective necks.</em></p>
<p>He had so internalized the idea that there <em>must be</em> an empire that he&rsquo;d limited himself to choosing <em>which one</em>. &ldquo;None of the above,&rdquo; didn&rsquo;t enter into it.</p>
<p>I told him that it sounded to me as if he&rsquo;d resigned himself to life as a whore and had settled for being able to choose who was going to pimp him. We&rsquo;re friends, though, so he laughed, albeit a bit nervously.</p>
<p><hr></p>
<div class="footnote-reference"><span id="footnote_DRAFTABLE_ENTRY_4614_1_body" class="footnote-number">[1]</span> Disclaimer: these are notes I took while reading this book. They include citations I found interesting or enlightening or particularly well-written. In some cases, I&rsquo;ve pointed out which of these applies to which citation; in others, I have not. Any benefit you gain from reading these notes is purely incidental to the purpose they serve of reminding me of what I once read. Please see Wikipedia for a summary if I&rsquo;ve failed to provide one sufficient for your purposes. If my notes serve to trigger an interest in this book, then I&rsquo;m happy for you.</div><h2>Citations</h2><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;You have no concept of time in a firefight. A few minutes. A few hours.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 13</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;War, in an instant, obliterates homes and communities, all that was once familiar, and leaves behind smoldering ruins and a trauma that you carry for the rest of your life. I have tasted enough of war, enough of my own fear, my body turned to jelly, to know that war is always evil, the purest expression of death, dressed up in patriotic cant about liberty and democracy and sold to the naïve as a ticket to glory, honor, and courage. It is a toxic and seductive elixir. Those who survive, as Kurt Vonnegut wrote, struggle afterwards to “reinvent themselves and their universe,” which, on some level, will never make sense again.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 13</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;If truth is the first casualty in war, ambiguity is the second. The bellicose rhetoric embraced and amplified by the American press, demonizing Vladimir Putin and elevating the Ukrainians to the status of demigods, demanding more robust military intervention along with the crippling sanctions designed to bring down Putin’s government, is infantile and dangerous. That the inverse version of the conflict is true in the Russian media fuels the insanity.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 14</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;I knew a Bosnian soldier who heard a sound behind a door while patrolling on the outskirts of Sarajevo. He fired a burst from his AK-47 through the door. A delay of a few seconds in combat can mean death. When he opened the door, he found the bloody remains of a twelve-year-old girl. His daughter was twelve. He never recovered.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 14</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The consequences of pushing NATO up to the borders with Russia—there is now a NATO missile base in Poland one hundred miles from the Russian border—were well known to policy makers. Yet they did it anyway. It made no geopolitical sense. But it made commercial sense. War, after all, is a business, a very lucrative one. It is why we spent two decades in Afghanistan although there was near universal consensus after a few years of fruitless fighting that we had waded into a quagmire we could never win.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 16</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The full-throated cries for war, echoed shamelessly by the press, are justified by draining the conflict of historical context, by elevating ourselves as the saviors and casting whomever we oppose, from Saddam Hussein to Putin, as the new Nazi leader.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 19</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;We, echoing the empty promises from Moscow, claim we do not target civilians. Rulers always paint their militaries as humane, there to serve and protect. Collateral damage happens, but it is regrettable.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 20</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The Russian-speaking population in Ukraine, to Moscow, are worthy victims. Russia is their savior. The millions of Ukrainian families cowering in basements and subways, or forced to flee Ukraine, are unworthy victims. Ukrainian fighters are condemned as “Nazis.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 20</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The war in Iraq was as savage as the slaughter in Darfur, but to express outrage at what was happening to unworthy victims was to become branded as the enemy.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 21</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;It is not that worthy victims do not suffer, nor that they are not deserving of our support and compassion; it is that worthy victims alone are rendered human, people like us, and unworthy victims are not.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 22</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;In sharp contrast, the shooting down by Israel of a Libyan civilian airliner in February 1973 led to no outcry in the West, no denunciations for “cold-blooded murder,” and no boycott. This difference in treatment was explained by the New York Times precisely on the grounds of utility in a 1973 editorial: “No useful purpose is served by an acrimonious debate over the assignment of blame for the downing of a Libyan airliner in the Sinai Peninsula last week.” There was a very “useful purpose” served by focusing on the Soviet act, and a massive propaganda campaign ensued.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 23</div></div><p>They&rsquo;re all worthy victims. But to mourn one without the mentioning the other is to become at least implicitly a propaganda tool of one side or the other. Just like railing against Russia in Ukraine without acknowledging the history of the world&rsquo;s largest military poer does. You simply find yourself wholeheartedly agreeing with the country with $1T to blow on the military each year and somehow coincidentally and miraculously finds a war every time, just as the last ones were ending. Careful how you choose your friends.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;RT America was shut down six days after I denounced the invasion of Ukraine. If the network had continued, Ventura and I might have paid with our jobs, but at least for those six days they kept us on air. The New York Times issued a formal written reprimand in 2003 that forbade me to speak about the war in Iraq, although I had been the newspaper’s Middle East Bureau Chief, had spent seven years in the Middle East, and was an Arabic speaker. This reprimand set me up to be fired. If I violated the prohibition, under guild rules, the paper had grounds to terminate my employment. John Burns, another foreign correspondent at the paper, publicly supported the invasion of Iraq. He did not receive a reprimand.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 26</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;When I entered southern Iraq in the first Gulf War, it was flattened. Villages and towns were smoldering ruins. Bodies of the dead, including women and children, lay scattered on the ground. Water purification systems had been bombed. Power stations had been bombed. Schools and hospitals had been bombed. Bridges had been bombed. The United States military always wages war by “overkill,”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 28</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;“Thirty-five percent of the victims,” Nick Turse wrote of the war in Vietnam, “died within 15 to 20 minutes.” Death from the skies, like death on the ground, was often unleashed capriciously. “It was not out of the ordinary for US troops in Vietnam to blast a whole village or bombard a wide area in an effort to kill a single sniper.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 29</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;These are our calling cards: canisters of napalm, daisy-cutter bombs, anti-personnel rockets, high-explosive rockets, incendiary rockets, cluster bombs, high-explosive shells, and iron fragmentation bombs—including the 40,000-pound bomb loads dropped by giant B-52 Stratofortress bombers—along with chemical defoliants and chemical gases dropped from the sky.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 30</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;All of this remains unspoken as we express our anguish for the people of Ukraine and revel in our moral superiority. The life of a Palestinian or an Iraqi child is as precious as the life of a Ukrainian child. No one should live in fear and terror. No one should be sacrificed on the altar of Mars. But until all victims are worthy, until all who wage war are held accountable and brought to justice, this hypocritical game of life and death will continue. Some human beings will be worthy of life. Others will not. Drag Putin off to the International Criminal Court and put him on trial. But make sure George W. Bush is in the cell next to him.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 30</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;It does not matter how wrong they are, how absurd their theories, how many times they lie or denigrate other cultures and societies as uncivilized or how many murderous military interventions go bad. They are immovable props, the parasitic mandarins of power that are vomited up in the dying days of any empire,&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 32</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;They advocated for air strikes in Serbia, calling for the U.S. to “take out” Slobodan Milošević.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 33</div></div><p>He was exonerated but rotted away anyway. Is the Hague reliable? What if it exonerated Putin?</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;[…] the dissolution of Iraq, the destruction of its civilian infrastructure, including the obliteration of eighteen of twenty electricity-generating plants and nearly all the water-pumping and sanitation systems during a forty-three-day period when 90,000 tons of bombs were rained down on the country,&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 33</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;They continue to call for a war with Iran, with Fred Kagan stating that “there is nothing we can do short of attacking to force Iran to give up its nuclear weapons […]&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 34</div></div><p>They just officially admitted that this was always a fairy tale.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;[…] they swiftly migrated to the Democratic Party rather than support Donald Trump, who showed no desire to start a conflict with Russia and who called the invasion of Iraq a “big, fat mistake.” Besides, as they correctly pointed out, Hillary Clinton was a fellow neocon. And liberals wonder why nearly half the electorate, who revile these arrogant, unaccountable power brokers, as they should, voted for Trump.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 36</div></div><p>True, no-one in my family would ever have voted for Hillary. Like I couldn&rsquo;t, but for different reasons.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;They did not serve in the military. Their children do not serve in the military. But they eagerly ship young American men and women off to fight and die for their self-delusional dreams of empire and American hegemony. Or, as in Ukraine, they provide hundreds of millions of dollars in weaponry and logistical support to sustain long and bloody proxy wars.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 36</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;American global domination, they claim, is benign, a force for good, “benevolent hegemony.” The world, Charles Krauthammer insisted, welcomes “our power.” All enemies, from Saddam Hussein to Vladimir Putin, are the new Hitler. All U.S. interventions are a fight for freedom that make the world a safer place. All refusals to bomb and occupy another country are a 1938 Munich moment, a pathetic retreat from confronting evil by the new Neville Chamberlain.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 36</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The warmongers build a campaign against a country such as Iraq or Russia and then wait for a crisis—they call it the next Pearl Harbor—to justify the unjustifiable.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 37</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The Russian invasion of Ukraine, like the attacks of 9/11, is a self-fulfilling prophecy. Putin, like everyone else they target, only understands force. We can, they assure us, militarily bend Russia to our will.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 39</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;I do not know if these people are stupid or cynical or both. They are lavishly funded by the war industry. They are never dropped from the networks for their repeated idiocy. They rotate in and out of power, parked in places like the Council on Foreign Relations or the Brookings Institution, before being called back into government.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 40</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;This campaign of mass murder is still mythologized in Indonesia as an epic battle against the forces of evil and barbarity, much as U.S. popular culture for many decades mythologized our genocide of Native Americans and held up our own killers, gunmen, outlaws, and murderous cavalry units of the Old West as heroes&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 42</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The bifurcation between work and life—a bifurcation that many in the U.S. military, today’s fossil fuel or health insurance industry, or Wall Street firms such as Goldman Sachs also must make—allows human beings who exploit, destroy, and kill other human beings to blot out much of their daily existence.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 44</div></div><p>I can almost guarantee Hedges hasn&rsquo;t seen <em>Severance</em>.</p>
<p>The following are the words of a soldier named Fanning.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The military wasn’t interested in preserving freedom or democracy. It was only interested in protecting the profits of those in power and expanding the U.S. hegemony. I was not a Hollywood freedom fighter. I was a cog in the imperialist machine. I preyed on the poorest, most exploited people on the planet.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 51</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;These people can’t do any wrong because they’ve served. This reverence for the military is priming the population to accept military rule and a form of fascism or proto-fascism. That’s why I felt even more compelled to get out.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 56</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;“What I didn’t know as I entered [Afghanistan] with the 2nd Army Ranger Battalion was that the Taliban had essentially surrendered after the initial assault by the Air Force and the Special Forces,” Fanning said of his first tour, which started in late 2001. “Our job was essentially to draw the Taliban back into the fight. Surrender wasn’t good enough for politicians after 9/11. We wanted blood. We wanted a head count. It really didn’t matter who it was.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 58</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;“I live in a country that is so wealthy we can wage wars and not have to think about them,” Turner said. “It is a pathology handed down from generation to generation. We talk about our military. We use words like ‘heroism.’ But when will we start to care about people whose names are difficult to pronounce? The list of people lost is so vast. How do I write about this and share it in a country that does not want to hear it? We want narratives that are easy and complete, ones we can process. We want wars to be recorded the way historians or people who make tombstones in cemeteries do. They give us the start, the duration, and end of the war. But for those of us who were in war it does not end. If you talk to my grandfather in Fresno, California, at some point during the day, you will be in the presence of World War II.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 67</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;War exposes the lies we tell ourselves about ourselves. It rips open the hypocrisy of our religions and secular institutions. Those who return from war have learned something which is often incomprehensible to those who have stayed home. We are not a virtuous nation. God and fate have not blessed us above others. Victory is not assured. War is neither glorious nor noble. And we carry within us the capacity for evil we ascribe to those we fight.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 72</div></div><p>And the Russians tell themselves the exact same ameliorative lies.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Military chaplains, a majority of whom are evangelical Christians, defend the life of the unborn, tout America as a Christian nation, support the death penalty, and eagerly bless the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan as holy crusades. The hollowness of their morality, the staggering disconnect between the values they claim to promote, is ripped open in war.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 73</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Wars may have to be fought to ensure survival, but they are always tragic. They always bring to the surface the worst elements of any society, those who have a penchant for violence and a lust for absolute power. They turn the moral order upside down. It was the criminal class that first organized the defense of Sarajevo. When these goons were not manning roadblocks to hold off the besieging Bosnian Serb army, they were looting, raping, and killing the Serb residents in the city.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 74</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Ask a combat veteran struggling to piece his or her life together about God, and watch the raw vitriol and pain pour out. They have seen into the corrupt heart of America, into the emptiness of its most sacred institutions, into our staggering hypocrisy, and those of us who refuse to heed their words become complicit in the evil they denounce.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 75</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The rage soldiers feel after a roadside bomb explodes, killing or maiming their comrades, or when a helicopter or troop transport plane is shot down and everyone inside is killed, is one that is easily directed over time to innocent civilians, who are fused with the insurgents. It is a short psychological leap, but a massive moral leap. It is a leap from killing to murder. Soldiers and Marines swiftly become socialized to murder.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 75</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Some of the remains had to be scooped up by putting our hands together as though we were cupping water. That was very common. A lot of the deaths were from IEDs or explosions. You might have an upper torso, but you needed to scoop the rest of the remains into a body bag. It was very common to have body bags that when you picked them up, they would sink in the middle because they were filled with flesh.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 86</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;“You know, you see a guy who’s paralyzed, and in a wheelchair, and you think he’s just in a wheelchair,” he says in Body of War. “You don’t think about the, you know, the stuff inside that’s paralyzed. I can’t cough because my stomach muscles are paralyzed, so I can’t work up the full coughing energy.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 99</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Tomas joined the Army immediately after 9/11 to go to Afghanistan and hunt down the people behind the attacks. He did not oppose the Afghanistan war. “In fact, if I had been injured in Afghanistan, there would be no Body of War movie to begin with,” he said. But he never understood the call to invade Iraq.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 100</div></div><p>So close yet so far. Are you anti-war or not?</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;He became increasingly depressed about his impending deployment to Iraq when he was in basic training at Fort Benning, Georgia. He asked the battalion doctor for antidepressants. The doctor said he had to meet first with the unit’s chaplain, who told him, “I think you will be happier when you get over to Iraq and start killing Iraqis.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 100</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;“I look at the TV through the lens of his eyes and can see he is invisible,” said Claudia, standing in the living room as her husband rested in the bedroom. An array of books on death, the afterlife, and dying is spread out around her. “No one is sick [on television]. No one is disabled. No one faces death. Dying in America is a very lonely business.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 101</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;I write this letter on behalf of us all—the human detritus your war has left behind, those who will spend their lives in unending pain and grief. I write this letter, my last letter, to you, Mr. Bush and Mr. Cheney. I write not because I think you grasp the terrible human and moral consequences of your lies, manipulation and thirst for wealth and power. I write this letter because, before my own death, I want to make it clear that I, and hundreds of thousands of my fellow veterans, along with millions of my fellow citizens, along with hundreds of millions more in Iraq and the Middle East, know fully who you are and what you have done.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 106</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;You were not willing to risk yourselves for our nation but you sent hundreds of thousands of young men and women to be sacrificed in a senseless war with no more thought than it takes to put out the garbage.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 106</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;I hope, for your sakes, that you find the moral courage to face what you have done to me and to many, many others who deserved to live. I hope that before your time on earth ends, as mine is now ending, you will find the strength of character to stand before the American public and the world, and in particular the Iraqi people, and beg for forgiveness.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 108</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Filmic and photographic images of combat are shorn of the heart-pounding fear, awful stench, deafening noise, and exhaustion of the battlefield. Such images turn confusion and chaos, the chief element of combat, into an artful war narrative. They turn war into porn. Soldiers and Marines, especially those who have never seen war, buy cases of beer and watch movies like Platoon, movies meant to denounce war, and as they do so revel in the despicable power of weapons.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 110</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;If we had to stand over the mangled corpses of the schoolchildren killed in Afghanistan or Ukraine and listen to the wails of their parents, the clichés about liberating the women of Afghanistan or bringing freedom to the Afghan or Ukrainian people would be obscene. Therefore, war is carefully sanitized.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 111</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Despair and suicide grip survivors. More Vietnam veterans committed suicide after the war than were killed during it. The inhuman qualities drilled into soldiers and Marines in wartime defeat them in peacetime. This is what Homer taught us in The Iliad, the great book on war, and The Odyssey, the great book on the long journey to recovery by professional killers. Many never readjust. They cannot emotionally connect with wives, children, parents, or friends, retreating into personal hells of self-destructive numbness, anguish and rage.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 112</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;David Lloyd George, wartime prime minister of Britain, in his memoirs used language like this to describe the conflict: [I]nexhaustible vanity that will never admit a mistake . . . individuals who would rather the million perish than that they as leaders should own—even to themselves—that they were blunderers . . . the notoriety attained by a narrow and stubborn egotism, unsurpassed among the records of disaster wrought by human complacency . . . a bad scheme badly handled . . . impossible orders issued by Generals who had no idea what the execution of their commands really meant . . . this insane enterprise . . . this muddy and muddle-headed venture .&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 115</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Our own generals and politicians, who nearly two decades ago launched the greatest strategic blunder in American history and wasted $7 trillion on quagmires in the Middle East, are no less egotistical and incompetent than Putin.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 116</div></div><p>The following passage is about WWI.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The moral and mental defects of the leaders of the human race had been demonstrated with some exactitude. One of them (Woodrow Wilson) later admitted that the war had been fought for business interests; another (David Lloyd George) had told a newspaperman: “If people really knew, the war would be stopped tomorrow, but of course they don’t—and can’t know. The correspondents don’t write and the censorship wouldn’t pass the truth.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 117</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The American attorney Harold Shapiro, following World War I, examined the medical records of the Army on behalf of a disabled veteran. He was appalled at the reality these records elucidated and the misperception of the war within the public. The medical descriptions, he wrote, rendered “all that I had read and heard previously as being either fiction, isolated reminiscence, vague generalization or deliberate propaganda.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 120</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Honestly examining past wars gives us the ability to understand current wars. But this is a Herculean struggle. The public is fed, and yearns for, the myth. It is empowering and ennobling. It celebrates supposed national virtues and military prowess. It allows an alienated population to feel part of a national collective engaged in a noble crusade. The celebration of the destructive force of our weaponry makes us feel personally empowered. All wars, past and present, are effectively shrouded in this myth.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 122</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;There are no images in these memorials of men or women with their guts hanging out of their bellies, screaming pathetically for their mothers. We do not see mangled corpses being shoved in body bags. There are no sights of children burned beyond recognition or moaning in horrible pain. There are no blind and deformed wrecks of human beings limping through life.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 124</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;We are forever saving Private Ryan. We view ourselves as eternal liberators. These plastic representations of war reconfigure the past in light of the present. War memorials and romantic depictions of war in films are the social and moral props used to create the psychological conditions to wage new wars.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 124</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;There are times—World War II and the Serb assault on Bosnia would be examples—when a population is pushed into a war. There are times when a nation must ingest the poison of violence to survive. But this violence always deforms and maims those who use it.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 126</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The owners of coal companies at the turn of the twentieth century in southern West Virginia found that by funding local baseball teams they could blunt the solidarity of workers. Towns and coal camps rallied around their individual teams. Workers divided themselves according to team loyalty. Sport rivalries became personal. The owners, elated, used the teams to help fracture the labor movement. And the infernal logic is no different today.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 130</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Hundreds of African American men, women, and children, many born free in the surrounding Pennsylvania towns, were abducted by invading Confederate forces led by Gen. Robert E. Lee and shipped south to be sold in the slave markets in Richmond, Virginia.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 132</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The inability of most generals to adapt, as Allen C. Guelzo wrote in Gettysburg: The Last Invasion, “makes the Civil War look like an exercise in raw stupidity equivalent to the slaughters on the Western Front [of World War I].”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 133</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Thomas D. Marbaker, the author of History of the Eleventh New Jersey Volunteers: From Its Organization to Appomattox wrote of the aftermath of the battle:&rdquo;<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Upon the open fields, like sheaves bound by the reaper, in crevices of the rocks, behind fences, trees and buildings; in thickets, where they had crept for safety only to die in agony; by stream or wall or hedge, wherever the battle had raged or their waking steps could carry them, lay the dead. Some with faces bloated and blackened beyond recognition, lay with glassy eyes staring up at the blazing summer sun; others, with faces downward and clenched hands filled with grass or earth, which told of the agony of the last moments.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;All around was the wreck the battle-storm leaves in its wake—broken caissons, dismounted guns, small arms bent and twisted by the storm or dropped and scattered by disabled hands; dead and bloated horses, torn and ragged equipment, and all the sorrowful wreck that the waves of battle leave at their ebb; and overall, hugging the earth like a fog, poisoning every breath, the pestilential stench of decaying humanity.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div></blockquote><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The sight of human bodies, along with eviscerated horses gasping in pain and struggling to rise despite their gaping wounds, reduced her to tears and panic.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 141</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Only 90 of the 15,000 people originally in the Bochnia ghetto survived the war.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 144</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Your daily problems, which you try to solve with so much determination, are insignificant in the view of the awesome past of your ancestors. So you are told, but this is not true. Life is made out of difficulties and joys, of sorrows and utter happiness, but as long as your souls are not soiled with meanness which hurts others, be proud of your life.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 148</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Lola and her mother were put to work with other prisoners digging up a Jewish cemetery. The headstones were used for paving roads and constructing latrines.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 149</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;They were quarantined in Camp C after being shaved, sprayed with DDT, and tattooed. She remembers seeing a group of dwarfs in the camp. “They were so beautiful,” she said. “I wanted to play with them. They were like dolls. On the second or third night they all disappeared.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 150</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;They told the prisoners the Birkenau camp would be dynamited, and ordered some 60,000 prisoners from Birkenau and the satellite camps to begin a thirty-five-mile march through the snow to a freight yard. Fifteen thousand prisoners died on the march.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 150</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Then the guards began to disappear. She remembers the bloated and blackened bodies of soldiers in the fields. One morning she and the other prisoners saw the camp commander in civilian clothes riding away on a bicycle. The war was over.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 151</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;It was a decline into permanent war, not Islam, that killed the liberal, democratic movements in the Arab world, ones that held great promise in the early part of the twentieth century in countries such as Egypt, Syria, Lebanon, and Iran. It is a state of permanent war that is finishing off the liberal traditions in Israel and the United States.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 154</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The moment war is declared, however, the mass of the people, through some spiritual alchemy, become convinced that they have willed and expected the deed themselves,&ldquo; Bourne wrote. &ldquo;They then with the exception of a few malcontents, proceed to allow themselves to be regimented, coerced, deranged in all the environments of their lives, and turned into a solid manufactory of destruction toward whatever other people may have, in the appointed scheme of things, come with the range of the Government&rsquo;s disapprobation. The citizen throws off his contempt and indifferent to Government, identifies himself with its purposes, revives all his military memories and symbols, and the State once more walks, an august presence, through the imaginations of men. […]&rdquo;&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 154</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Fear stops us from objecting to government spending on a bloated military. Fear means we will not ask unpleasant questions of those in power. Fear means that we will be willing to give up our rights and liberties for security. Fear keeps us penned in like domesticated animals.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 156</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Foreign aid is given to countries such as Egypt, which receives some $3 billion in assistance and is required to buy American weapons with $1.3 billion of the money. The taxpayers fund the research, development, and building of weapons systems and then buy them on behalf of foreign governments. It is a bizarre circular system. It defies the concept of a free-market economy.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 156</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Our permanent war economy has bipartisan support. The two ruling parties support its destructive fury because it funds them. To challenge the military-industrial complex is political suicide.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 157</div></div><p>Citing from <em>Dostoyevsky&rsquo;s</em> <em>Notes from Underground</em>,</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;I never even managed to become anything: neither wicked nor good, neither a scoundrel nor an honest man, neither a hero nor an insect,&ldquo; the Underground Man wrote. &ldquo;And now I am living out my life in my corner, taunting myself with the spiteful and utterly futile consolation that it is even impossible for an intelligent man seriously to become anything, and only fools become something.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 158</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;By the end of the Vietnam War, when the costs of the war ate away at Lyndon Johnson&rsquo;s Great Society and domestic oil production began its steady, inexorable decline, we saw our country transformed from one that primarily produced to one that primarily consumed. We started borrowing to maintain a lifestyle we could no longer afford. We began to use force, especially in the Middle East, to feed our insatiable demand for cheap oil.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 158</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;If we continued to believe that we can expand our wars and go deeper into debt to maintain an unsustainable level of consumption, we will dynamite the foundations of our society.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 158</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The European Union has allocated hundred of millions of Euros to purchase weapons for Ukraine. Germany will almost triple its defense budget. The Biden administration has asked Congress to provide $6.4 billion to funding to assist Ukraine, supplementing the $650 million in military aid to Ukraine over the past year. The permanent war economy operates outside the laws of supply and demand. it is the root of the two-decade-long quagmire in the Middle east. It is the root of the conflict with Moscow. The merchants of death are satanic.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 159–160</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Immanuel Kant called absolute moral imperatives that are used to carry out immoral acts &lsquo;a radical evil.&rsquo; He wrote that this kind of evil was always a form of unadulterated self-love. It was the worst type of self-deception. It provided a moral façade for terror and murder.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 160</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;All attempts to control the universe, to play God, to become the arbiters of life and death, have been carried out by moral idiots. They will relentlessly push forward, exploiting and pillaging, perfecting their terrible tools of technology and science, until their creation destroys them and us.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 164</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;We carry on our backs this awful cross of death, for the essence of war is death, and the weight of it digs into our shoulders and eats away at our souls. We drag it through life, up hills and down hills, along the roads, into the most intimate recesses of our lives. It never leaves us. Those who know us best know that there is something unspeakabale and evil many of us harbor within us. This evil is intimate. It is personal. We do not speak its name. It is the evil of things done and things left undone. It is the evil of war.</p>
<p>&ldquo;War is captured in the long, vacant stares, in the silences, in the trembling fingers, in the memories most of us keep buried deep within us, in the tears.&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 166</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;There are days I wish I was whole. I wish I could put down this cross. I envy those who, in their innocence, believe in the innate goodness of America and the righteousness of war, and celebrate what we know is despicable.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 167</div></div><p>Damn, Chris.</p>
<p>That&rsquo;s about right, though. I just spoke with a friend the other night who said that I was quite cynical about American and that he&rsquo;d rather have America in charge than China or Russia. I was taken aback, but rallied and asked him whether he wasn&rsquo;t the more cynical one, who couldn&rsquo;t imagine a world without a boot on our collective necks. He had so internalized the idea that there <em>must be</em> an empire that he&rsquo;d limited himself to choosing <em>which one</em>. &ldquo;None of the above,&rdquo; didn&rsquo;t enter into it. I told him that it sounded to me as if he&rsquo;d resigned himself to life as a whore and had settled for being able to choose who was going to pimp him. We&rsquo;re friends, though, so he laughed, albeit a bit nervously.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;[…] as James Baldwin wrote, that &lsquo;people who shut their eyes to reality simply invite their own destruction, and anyone who insists on remaining in a state of innocence long after that innocence is dead turns himself into a monster.&rsquo;&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 167</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;I cannot impart to you the cheerful and childish optimism that is the curse of America. I can only tell you to stand up, to pick up your cross, to keep moving. I can only tell you that you must always defy the forces that eat away at you, at the nation—this plague of war.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 168</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;All acts of healing and love—and the defiance of war is an affirmation of love—allow us to shout out to the vast powers of the universe that, however broken we are, we are not helpless, however mush we despair, we are not without hope, however weak we may feel, we will always, always, always resist.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 168</div></div>      </div>
      </div>
        <div class="footer">
    <div class="footer-data"><div class="footer-links"><ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/contact.php" title="">Contact</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/support.php" title="">Support</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/privacy.php" title="">Privacy</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/rights.php" title="">Rights</a></li></ul></div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="copyright">Copyright (c) 1999-2026 earthli.com. All Rights Reserved.</div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="versions">Powered by <ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore/app_news.php">earthli News 3.7</a></li><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore" title="">earthli WebCore&trade; 3.7</a></li></ul></div></div>    </div>
      </div>
  </div>  </body>
</html>
]]>
  </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
      <title type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[The Plot by Jean Hanff Korelitz (2021) (read in 2022)]]>
  </title>
    <id>https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=4596</id>
    <link href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=4596"/>
    <updated>2023-01-30T22:48:39+01:00</updated>
    <author>
        <name type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[Marco von Ballmoos]]>
  </name>
      <uri>https://earthli.com/users/marco</uri>
    </author>
      <summary type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<p><small class="notes">Standard disclaimer [1]</small></p>
<p><a href="https://www.earthli.com/data/news/attachments/entry/4596/the_plot_by_jean_hanff_korelitz.jpg"><img src="https://www.earthli.com/data/news/attachments/entry/4596/the_plot_by_jean_hanff_korelitz_tn.jpg" alt=" " class=" align-right"></a>This is a kind of a meta-plot-twist book: it&rsquo;s a book with multiple pretty inventive plot twists about an author who becomes famous for having written a book with a nearly shockingly inventive and unique plot twist.</p>
<p>Jacob Finch Bonner is an author who stormed out of the gate,... [<a class="complete-text-link" href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=4596">More</a>]</p>
]]>
  </summary>
      <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<html lang="en">
  <head>
    <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/themes/ice.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/fonts/raleway.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/core/medium.css">
  </head>
  <body>
<div class="style-controls">  <div class="page">
    <div class="page-body">
<div class="info-box-top">
<p>
Published by <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_user.php?name=marco" title="Marco von Ballmoos" class="visible">marco</a> on <span class="date-time">30. Jan 2023 22:48:39 (GMT-5)</span>
</p>
</div>
      <div class="text-flow wide">
  <p><small class="notes">Standard disclaimer [1]</small></p>
<p><a href="https://www.earthli.com/data/news/attachments/entry/4596/the_plot_by_jean_hanff_korelitz.jpg"><img src="https://www.earthli.com/data/news/attachments/entry/4596/the_plot_by_jean_hanff_korelitz_tn.jpg" alt=" " class=" align-right"></a>This is a kind of a meta-plot-twist book: it&rsquo;s a book with multiple pretty inventive plot twists about an author who becomes famous for having written a book with a nearly shockingly inventive and unique plot twist.</p>
<p>Jacob Finch Bonner is an author who stormed out of the gate, more or less, with a highly critically acclaimed first novel that never landed on the NYT best-seller list, but garnered a few industry awards that left everyone waiting for his next book. He takes a swipe at it, but fails utterly, selling only a few hundred copies. His agent doesn&rsquo;t give up, but it looks grim. </p>
<p>The next few years are tough, as he parlays his initial fame into a living of sorts, working at writer&rsquo;s retreats. he kinda sorta genuinely tries to help, but he can barely hide his contempt for them, for his peers, and for himself. So it&rsquo;s years later and he&rsquo;s dragging around a laptop with the corpse of his never-published third book and the desperate scraps that make up what he would only the most desperate and hopeful person could even call something that might become his fourth book.</p>
<p>He&rsquo;s a pretty sad dude until, at one of these writer&rsquo;s retreats, he meets an arrogant young man whose confidence in his own completely unproven abilities rest upon his having thought of the most amazing plot for a book. He shares a few pages with Jacob, who deems the writing style surprisingly solid, though not stellar.</p>
<p>The young man spills the rest of his plot in order to prove to Jacob that he really will be unstoppable. After having heard the plot, Jacob can&rsquo;t disagree, grinding his teeth in his mind at the absolute injustice of such a brilliant plot having found its way into the head of a hack like that young man when an author of more stature and talent like Jacob would have been a much more-deserving target.</p>
<p>A few more years pass, during which Jacob spirals more, never publishing again. He eventually looks up the young man and discovers that he&rsquo;d died of a drug overdose scant months after their interaction at the retreat. It doesn&rsquo;t take long before Jacob convinces himself that it would be unfair to the amazing story to never let it fly free.</p>
<p>Cut to a year later. Jacob is a world-famous author, having written <em>Crib</em>, which, as predicted by its progenitor, blew through all of the bestseller lists, got a top-flight movie option with Spielberg, and otherwise put the author&rsquo;s star into the firmament. He&rsquo;s enjoying a busy schedule and his rich lifestyle when, on a book-tour stop, he meets an amazing woman whose personality fits with his perfectly.</p>
<p>They start long-distance dating and he finds himself falling in love—his life is totally working out. And then he gets a message, &ldquo;I know what you did.&rdquo; He&rsquo;s an incredibly insecure person so, instead of ignoring it, he lets it eat at him. His productivity drops, he starts going a bit crazy, and his relationship suffers. She&rsquo;s there with him, even though he doesn&rsquo;t tell her what&rsquo;s going on.</p>
<p>The messages continue occasionally. He proposes marriage. He manages to finish his follow-up book, cementing his career and his fortune. Another message arrives, threatening to blow everything out in the open.</p>
<p>He takes to the road to investigate what had happened to his old student. He finds out that he&rsquo;d died under suspicious circumstances. He finds out that the young man&rsquo;s sister had been an odd duck, and had had a very clever, if not brilliant daughter, who&rsquo;d been kept shut up in their home with her mother, who&rsquo;d had her when she was very young—and very brilliant herself. Bitter that her life had been wasted, she was determined to not let her daughter breathe.</p>
<p>Jacob finds out that the daughter had applied to university against her mother&rsquo;s wishes—and had been accepted. The mother offers to drive with her daughter to college, taking a trip together. He find out that the mother had died in a mysterious tent fire at a campsite. He finds out that maybe it was the daughter who&rsquo;d died, and the brilliant mother who&rsquo;d taken her daughter&rsquo;s place at the university to which they were headed. Yup, that&rsquo;s what happened. The mother killed her daughter and took her place. Then she killed her brother with a fake drug overdose to make sure that he wouldn&rsquo;t write the book he&rsquo;d been trumpeting about to his seminar teacher.</p>
<p>And then, when Jacob ended up writing the book anyway, she finagled a cute-meet on a book tour, and made him fall in love and marry her. Once he&rsquo;d published his second bestseller—but especially once he thought he&rsquo;d figured out the story, although he didn&rsquo;t at all suspect that it was his wife—she didn&rsquo;t need him anymore, so she poisoned him slowly, letting him know what was happening. She then goes on a tour herself, reminiscing about her late husband.</p>
<p>Part of the allure of this book for me (and likely for the friend who recommended it) is that a large part of it takes part in upstate and central New York State. The book is well-written and contains both interesting thoughts on being a writer as well as snippets of Jake&rsquo;s novel <em>Crib</em> interspersed throughout, so it really goes hard on the meta thing—but it pulls it off, I think.</p>
<p><hr></p>
<div class="footnote-reference"><span id="footnote_DRAFTABLE_ENTRY_4596_1_body" class="footnote-number">[1]</span> Disclaimer: these are notes I took while reading this book. They include citations I found interesting or enlightening or particularly well-written. In some cases, I&rsquo;ve pointed out which of these applies to which citation; in others, I have not. Any benefit you gain from reading these notes is purely incidental to the purpose they serve of reminding me of what I once read. Please see Wikipedia for a summary if I&rsquo;ve failed to provide one sufficient for your purposes. If my notes serve to trigger an interest in this book, then I&rsquo;m happy for you.</div><h2>Citations</h2><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;[…] pass along the sad, sad advice his own MFA advisor had once tried to give him: You’re only as successful as the last book you published, and you’re only as good as the next book you’re writing. So shut up and write.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 40</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Again and again he urged his new correspondents to check their spelling, keep track of their characters’ names, and give at least a tiny bit of thought to what basic ideas their work should convey, before they typed those thrilling words: THE END. Some of them listened. Others seemed somehow to believe that the act of hiring a professional writer magically rendered their own writing “professional.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 47</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;“I like the idea of a successful writer greeting the guests when they arrive. Gives them something real to aspire to.” Jake opted not to correct this remarkable statement in any of the ways he might have done.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 49</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Jake hadn’t even realized that Evan was a Vermonter, or that his parents and sister were already dead, which was very tragic in light of the fact that he was fairly young, himself. Not one of these things had ever come up in conversation between them, of course. They’d had no conversation, really, about anything else but Evan Parker’s remarkable novel in progress.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 60</div></div><p>Are you sure it&rsquo;s the right one? Is there a picture?</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Jake didn’t believe in much. He didn’t believe that any god had made the universe, let alone that said god was still watching the goings-on and keeping track of every human act, all for the purpose of assigning a few millennia of Homo sapiens to a pleasant or an unpleasant afterlife. He didn’t believe in an afterlife. He didn’t believe in destiny, fate, luck, or the power of positive thinking. He didn’t believe that we get what we deserve, or that everything happens for a reason (what reason would that be?), or that supernatural forces impacted anything in a human life. What was left after all of that nonsense? The sheer randomness of the circumstances we are born into, the genes we’ve been dealt, our varying degrees of willingness to work our asses off, and the wit we may or may not possess to recognize an opportunity. Should it arise.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 61</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;But if you spend even a few minutes with other people’s stories and learn to ask yourself: What if this had happened to me? Or What if this happened to a person completely unlike me? Or In a world that’s different from the world I’m living in? Or What if it happened a little bit differently, under different circumstances? The possibilities are endless. The directions you can go, the characters you can meet along the way, the things you can learn, also endless. I’ve taught in MFA programs, and I can tell you, that’s maybe the most important thing anyone can teach you. Get out of your own head and look around. There are stories growing from trees.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 72</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Facebook had seemed harmless until the 2016 election, when it bombarded him with dubious ads and “push” polls about Hillary Clinton’s supposedly nefarious deeds.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 99</div></div><p>Literally every book anchors this Russiagate fiction further into reality. Incredible.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Most of her classmates—all of the boys, if you believed them, except maybe the shyest and most backward—were busy deflowering most of the girls, and if you didn’t count the trashed reputations of those two young ladies who’d already left school, nobody seemed especially exercised about it.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 119</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;[…] it took her no time at all to ramp up to the speed with which every other New Yorker raced down the streets, and within days of her return to the city she seemed to become yet another overworked Gothamite, perpetually rushing and with a baseline level of ambient stress that would probably have alarmed anyone outside the five boroughs.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 137</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Also, Maria was a lesbian, which meant that whatever else might happen, she was hardly going to drop the ball just short of the goalpost, the way her mother had.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 198</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;This had never been about an appropriation, real or imaginary, between two writers. This had been a far more intimate theft: not Jake’s at all but one Evan Parker himself had committed. What Parker had stolen was something he must have seen up close and very personal: the mother and the daughter and what had happened between them, right here, in this house. Of course she was angry. Not for one minute had she wanted her story to be told, not by her close relation and certainly not by a total stranger. That much, at long last, he finally understood.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 208</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The mistake, a product of his own arrogance, had cost him months. This had never been about an appropriation, real or imaginary, between two writers. This had been a far more intimate theft: not Jake’s at all but one Evan Parker himself had committed. What Parker had stolen was something he must have seen up close and very personal: the mother and the daughter and what had happened between them, right here, in this house. Of course she was angry. Not for one minute had she wanted her story to be told, not by her close relation and certainly not by a total stranger. That much, at long last, he finally understood.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 208</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;“And that’s where the dividing line is?” his wife asked. “Between something any of us might do under the circumstances and something only a truly evil person would do? Planning it?” He shrugged. His shoulders felt impossibly heavy as he lifted them and let them fall. “It seems like a good enough place to put the dividing line.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 301</div></div>      </div>
      </div>
        <div class="footer">
    <div class="footer-data"><div class="footer-links"><ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/contact.php" title="">Contact</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/support.php" title="">Support</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/privacy.php" title="">Privacy</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/rights.php" title="">Rights</a></li></ul></div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="copyright">Copyright (c) 1999-2026 earthli.com. All Rights Reserved.</div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="versions">Powered by <ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore/app_news.php">earthli News 3.7</a></li><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore" title="">earthli WebCore&trade; 3.7</a></li></ul></div></div>    </div>
      </div>
  </div>  </body>
</html>
]]>
  </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
      <title type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[Agency (The Jackpot Trilogy Book 2) by William Gibson (2021) (read in 2022)]]>
  </title>
    <id>https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=4588</id>
    <link href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=4588"/>
    <updated>2023-01-30T22:00:01+01:00</updated>
    <author>
        <name type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[Marco von Ballmoos]]>
  </name>
      <uri>https://earthli.com/users/marco</uri>
    </author>
      <summary type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<p><small class="notes">Standard disclaimer [1]</small></p>
<p><a href="https://www.earthli.com/data/news/attachments/entry/4588/cover_art,_agency_by_william_gibson.jpeg"><img src="https://www.earthli.com/data/news/attachments/entry/4588/cover_art,_agency_by_william_gibson_tn.jpeg" alt=" " class=" align-left"></a>This is a sequel to <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3865">The Peripheral</a> that, because of the wormhole technology involved, actually takes place <em>before</em> that book. The story takes place in an alternate future that had suffered through something called the &ldquo;Jackpot&rdquo;, which was a climate apocalypse that eliminated... [<a class="complete-text-link" href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=4588">More</a>]</p>
]]>
  </summary>
      <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<html lang="en">
  <head>
    <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/themes/ice.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/fonts/raleway.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/core/medium.css">
  </head>
  <body>
<div class="style-controls">  <div class="page">
    <div class="page-body">
<div class="info-box-top">
<p>
Published by <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_user.php?name=marco" title="Marco von Ballmoos" class="visible">marco</a> on <span class="date-time">30. Jan 2023 22:00:01 (GMT-5)</span>
</p>
</div>
      <div class="text-flow wide">
  <p><small class="notes">Standard disclaimer [1]</small></p>
<p><a href="https://www.earthli.com/data/news/attachments/entry/4588/cover_art,_agency_by_william_gibson.jpeg"><img src="https://www.earthli.com/data/news/attachments/entry/4588/cover_art,_agency_by_william_gibson_tn.jpeg" alt=" " class=" align-left"></a>This is a sequel to <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3865">The Peripheral</a> that, because of the wormhole technology involved, actually takes place <em>before</em> that book. The story takes place in an alternate future that had suffered through something called the &ldquo;Jackpot&rdquo;, which was a climate apocalypse that eliminated pretty much everything we&rsquo;re being told it will actually eliminate, but from which a tiny portion of humanity managed to escape with technology wildly beyond ours. They have flying cars, cloaking technology, incredible AIs, and also a mysterious (supposedly Chinese) server through which you can access the pasts of alternate realities (stubs). They also have oligarchs who run pretty much everything.</p>
<p>An extremely powerful woman named Ainsley Lowbeer has made it her mission to prevent what happened in her reality from happening in those of others, regardless of the fact that the changes she manages to make to their future won&rsquo;t affect her own in any way at all. However, she&rsquo;s still opposed by the klepts (oligarchs) of her world. Because the klepts have their domino theory and they don’t even want people in completely unreachable alternate continua to be out of their reach. They can’t take those people&rsquo;s money, but they can ensure that their ideology survives and allows the other continuum’s klepts to enrich themselves, as God intended.</p>
<p>This time, the mysterious server has provided Lowbeer and her crew with a connection to an alternate reality even earlier than the one explored in <em>The Peripheral</em>. As in that book, Lowbeer&rsquo;s crew has a powerful presence in this alternate past, not only because they are so technologically advanced, but because their own pasts are similar enough that they know how to make a ton of money (à la Biff Tanner in <em>Back to the Future II</em>).</p>
<p>Verity is a young software designer in this alternate reality who Lowbeer feels can be useful in her aims of getting the right president elected in order to do something about climate change and inequality, etc. They convince her that she&rsquo;s going to be testing a new user-interaction software for a high-flying company with shifty and mysterious provenance where she starts working with a military-grade AI called Eunice.</p>
<p>Eunice is the key to convince Verity&rsquo;s former boyfriend Stets, who&rsquo;s a fabulously wealthy tech tycoon (because of course he is) to help them achieve their ends. I mean, I get how no-one wants to write a book about boring, regular people, but is the only alternative to write about privileged, powerful, and nearly limitless billionaires? Anyway, they have to struggle against various forces arrayed against them, and end up doing a bunch of logistically fantastical things that you could only achieve if you had a tremendous amount of money and resources, but they triumph in the end and get the right person elected.</p>
<p>Gibson does a lovely job of describing his most amazing inventions with the least amount of prose. He almost casually assumes a world where timelines can communicate. Sometimes it’s apparently more difficult to communicate, but he doesn’t explain how or why. He just casually introduces replicators. Good. That’s science fiction. At some point, we got hard science fiction (Greg Bear, Gregory Benford), but then it took over. Anything that wasn’t explained to death was considered fantasy.</p>
<p>There are several passages where part of the beauty of them is that they&rsquo;re utterly incomprehensible without context. Meaning is tantalizingly close, but out of reach. Stripped of all unnecessary detail, as people familiar with the situation would do, instead of pedantically explicatory, for an audience that exists not in the context of the story, but in the context of there being a reader of the story about the reality these characters inhabit, to whom the context must be constantly explained.</p>
<p>His treatment of AI is good, too. Instead of being annoying and God-like, it feels more like, <em>obviously</em> this is how an AI would work, with multiples copies interacting simultaneously and sharing information. A hive mind pretending to be individuals, to ease communication with those who are more slow-thinking but capable of spontaneity and invention.</p>
<p>What&rsquo;s interesting is that, though the book is in an alternate history, Gibson has to inject modern-day conspiracy theories from our timeline that feel a bit jarring. Everything else is so fantastical and then he drops something like this,</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Could have been the butterfly effect, of course. Though the aunties, in both cases, lean toward something causing a reduction in Russian manipulation of social media. Which we assume would have had a similar result in our own time line.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 17</div></div><p>It&rsquo;s sad how American authors are so indoctrinated that they all have to mention Russian election interference. Stephenson did it too. It never happened. Russiagate was a lie. [2] It doesn&rsquo;t matter and it never mattered. It poisoned the minds of a generation. The U.S. is just poisonous to clarity of thought, even for those, like Gibson, who you&rsquo;d think might be capable of resisting.</p>
<p>On one level, this is a story of elites shitting their pants because they feel their bubble threatened by the antics that built their bubble in the first place, but then being able to lean back and relax in the knowledge that their efforts have returned to them a stability that comprises them never having to think about where anything they want might come from or whether they can obtain it, while nearly every other human being continues to toil in misery to keep that bubble going. </p>
<p>It&rsquo;s kind of a story about rich people who are mostly worried about other rich people trying to kill them. The suffering masses are nearly completely missing, or mentioned only tangentially, perhaps in the person of Connor, who is preternaturally gifted and not really of the lumpen proletariat anymore, anyway. He, too, has transcended through his usefulness to the rich.</p>
<p>One drawback to the focus on technology and ideas is that the characters end up being mostly pretty one-dimensional, even after 300+ pages. Carsyn is wholly unknown. Manuella nearly so. Caitlin a close runner-up. Kathy and Dixon made a drone and drove around. For whatever reason, Gibson needs to list them all and assure us that the whole, big, happy family is together at the end. I&rsquo;m picturing the stupid picnics at the end of all of the <em>Fast and the Furious</em> movies.</p>
<p>I read this immediately after having read Neal Stephenson&rsquo;s latest, so my reaction to its much, much tighter prose was, at times in the reactions to the citations below, nearly ecstatic. Gibson really does have a way with words.</p>
<p><hr></p>
<div class="footnote-reference"><span id="footnote_DRAFTABLE_ENTRY_4588_1_body" class="footnote-number">[1]</span> Disclaimer: these are notes I took while reading this book. They include citations I found interesting or enlightening or particularly well-written. In some cases, I&rsquo;ve pointed out which of these applies to which citation; in others, I have not. Any benefit you gain from reading these notes is purely incidental to the purpose they serve of reminding me of what I once read. Please see Wikipedia for a summary if I&rsquo;ve failed to provide one sufficient for your purposes. If my notes serve to trigger an interest in this book, then I&rsquo;m happy for you.</div><h2>Citations</h2><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>"Vespasian,” Detective Inspector Ainsley Lowbeer said, peering sidewise at Netherton over her greatcoat’s upraised collar, “our hobbyist of hellworlds. Recall him?”</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 7</div></div><p>Jesus. This is peak Gibson. Is he trying too hard?</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>“Contact’s been oblique, you say?”</p>
<p>“The aunties, for instance”—her pet name for her office’s coven of semisentient security algorithms—“are of relatively little use.”</p>
<p>Netherton grimaced at the very thought of them. A dappled Thames chimera broke the surface then, red and white. It rolled, four meters head to tail, lamplike eyes clustered above cartoonish feeding palps. Diving, it left a shallow wake of beige foam.</p>
<p>“So you can’t put a team of quants on it,” he asked, “to secure as much in-stub wealth as might be needed?” Having, of course, seen her do exactly that.</p>
<p>“No. Even the simplest messaging can be quite spotty.”</p>
<p>“What can you do, then?”</p>
<p>“Laterally encourage an autonomous, self-learning agent,” she said. “Then nudge it toward greater agency. It helps that they’re mad for AI there, though they’ve scarcely anything we’d consider that. By tracing historical fault lines around AI research here, we found what we needed there.”</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 8</div></div><p>That&rsquo;s more like it. We&rsquo;re In the future. Weird creatures. Dirty environment. AIs. Communication with the past. Self-funding. Had to read it three times. Just about perfect.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;They returned to her car, where it awaited them invisibly, a few dead leaves clinging to its roof, as though magically suspended.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 9</div></div><p>Transparent bubble on top, without saying it. This is a refreshing change from Stephenson.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Could have been the butterfly effect, of course. Though the aunties, in both cases, lean toward something causing a reduction in Russian manipulation of social media. Which we assume would have had a similar result in our own time line.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 17</div></div><p>I love how American authors are so indoctrinated that they all have to mention Russian election interference. Stephenson did it too. It never happened. Russiagate was a lie. It doesn&rsquo;t matter. It poisoned the minds of a generation. That place is poisonous to clarity of thought.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Now her tardibot answered the blue door, like an eight-legged raccoon in a small antique biohazard suit, its head an unpleasantly folded foreskin-like affair, with a central toothy ring of what he took to be mirror-polished steel. It seemed to peer up at him, however eyelessly. “Netherton,” it said, the voice hers, “come in.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 23</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>“He’d know about Cursion.”</p>
<p>“Know what, about them?”</p>
<p>“That they’re a subspecies of a former fully deniable Department of Defense op.”</p>
<p>“Like CIA venture capital stuff?”</p>
<p>“Nothing like it,” Eunice said. “That stuff’s up front. Megafauna. Cursion, when they were as legit as they ever really were, lived down in the underbrush. Still do, but their new coloration’s gaming. Sometimes, if DoD doubles down hard enough on the deniability, there’s zero memory left of the original mission. The op drifts free of the department, unfunded, forgotten. Doesn’t happen nearly as often as it did during Iraq, but that’s what Cursion is.”</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 41</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>“I liked the county,” she said, “even though it made me sad.”</p>
<p>“It did? Why?”</p>
<p>“They’re living in a conspiracy theory, but a real one. Controlled by secret masters. Your employer, primarily.”</p>
<p>“But isn’t it better there now, than if we hadn’t intervened?” he asked. “It is, I’m sure, but it makes a joke of their lives.”</p>
<p>“But everyone you know there is in on it.”</p>
<p>“I don’t know whether I’d rather know or not know,” she said, and took a bite of taco.</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 54</div></div><p>That&rsquo;s an entire short story there.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;[…] the microdrone, nothing but the blue of the tarps, then briefly blurred, as it zipped between two adjacent edges. To overlook the Bay, where something anomalously vast loomed in what was left of bad wildfire light, as though the horizon should sag beneath it. “What’s that?”</p>
<p>&ldquo;“Container ship,” Eunice said. “Chinese. Not their biggest, but up there.”&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 56</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;[…] staring up at a bifurcated crack he’d only recently noticed in the ceiling. Was it an actual crack, or an assembler artifact, positioned by an algorithm to suggest authenticity?&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 62</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;“Have you inquired in the county? Your younger self, there, has every sort of Washington connection. Including presidential, currently.”</p>
<p>&ldquo;“Of course,” Lowbeer said, “but nothing turned up.”&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 63</div></div><p>Just casually assuming a world where timelines can communicate. Sometimes it&rsquo;s difficult, but he doesn&rsquo;t explain how or why. Good. That&rsquo;s science fiction. At some point, we got hard science fiction (Greg Bear, Gregory Benford), but then it took over. Anything that wasn&rsquo;t explained to death was considered fantasy.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Watching the maker pump a tiny stream of steaming caffeine-free espresso into the waiting cup.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 63</div></div><p>Just casually introducing replicators.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Netherton said, looking down at the steaming black liquor in the small white china cup, the kitchen’s ceiling fixture reflected in it, surrounded by pale brown crema.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 63</div></div><p>Detailed but not hyper-detailed. Also, poetic.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>Netherton drank off his decaf, the gesture as denatured as the brew, and returned the cup to the maker. “Would that be your work, then, this crisis?”</p>
<p>“Most definitely not. It came with the territory, taking us entirely by surprise. Vespasian’s final stub promises to become exactly the sort of thing he most enjoyed inflicting.”</p>
<p>“Can you prevent it?”</p>
<p>“That depends on our available agency there. At the moment, we’ve none. The aunties give it grim odds.”</p>
<p>“You told me they weren’t involved.”</p>
<p>“Not in the sense you’re accustomed to, but there are no better actuaries.”</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 64</div></div><p>The beauty is that this passage is utterly incomprehensible without context. It&rsquo;s tantalizingly close, but out of reach. Stripped of all unnecessary detail, as people familiar with the situation would do, instead of pedantically explicatory, for an audience that exists not in the context of the story, but in the context of there being a reader of the story about the reality these characters inhabit, to whom the context must be constantly explained.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>Stets took a phone from one of his shorts pockets. He thumb-typed. Sent. Looked at Verity, then at his phone, then up at the screen. “He’ll take your call.” </p>
<p>“Already did,” she said. “I’m speaking with him now.”</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 66</div></div><p>Instead of being annoying and God-like, it feel more like, obviously this is how an AI would work, with multiples copies interacting simultaneously and sharing information. A hive mind pretending to be individuals, to ease communication.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>“They don’t wake each day with renewed gratitude for that particular bullet having been dodged, no,” said Lowbeer, “but that’s simply human nature. Meanwhile, in a world still subject to the other key stressors in our shared history, and with a complexly leveraged international crisis, one potentially involving nuclear weapons . . .”</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 76</div></div><p>Sounds familiar.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;“I’m just bringing milk for Thomas,” he said, drawing one of the bottles from the carrying bag. Sensing this, the bag crinkled, trying to origami itself into the butterfly it needed to become in order to fly back to the newsagent.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 126</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>“Stub?”</p>
<p>“Regrettable expression,” Lowbeer said, “regrettably common usage, here. Inaccurate as well, since your continuum won’t remain short. It appears so to us, but only since it’s just diverged from our shared past. Its birth, as it were. But it also reflects an undeniably imperial aspect of what we’re doing, because we assume our continuum to be that from which so-called stubs branch. The mechanism that permits us to do that appears to be located here, however mysteriously. Stubs, lacking that agency, are unable to initiate stubs of their own.”</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 200</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>“She’s altering stubs to produce worlds in which the klept enjoy less power,” Lev said, absolutely confirming it for Netherton.</p>
<p>“It’s art, Lev,” Netherton protested, taking a second page from Lowbeer, “poetry. What happens in a stub stays there.”</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 221</div></div><p>But the klepts have their domino theory and they don&rsquo;t even want people in completely unreachable alternate continua to be out of their reach. They can&rsquo;t take their money but they can ensure that their ideology survives and allows the other continuum&rsquo;s klepts enrich themselves, as God intended.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>“Once again, then,” she said, “the divide between the ambitions of conspirators and the desire, among those bringing us word of those ambitions, to preserve whatever aspect of the status quo they themselves hold dear.”</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 226</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>“My mother told me about you,” Netherton said, surprising himself, “when I was a small child. Not you specifically, but a figure in a story, benevolent but frightening. She called that figure the Adjustor. Adjustor of destinies, she said, for those who threatened the stability of the klept. When I was older, I came to understand that you, or rather someone in your role, actually existed.”</p>
<p>She looked toward the white candle. “It was never envisioned as a solo position. There were a number of us, originally. I’m simply the last. Should the klept ever truly decide to be done with me, they need only deny me access to the technology that keeps me alive and functional.”</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 227</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Their tedious ambition and contempt for rule of law would bring everything down, around their ears and ours. They managed to do that with the previous world order, after all, though then it was effectively their goal. They welcomed the jackpot, the chaos it brought. The results of our species’ insults to nature did much of their work for them. No brakes magically appeared then, and I don’t see them appearing now, absent someone free to act, with sufficient agency, against their worst impulses. The biosphere only survives, today, by virtue of what prosthetic assistance we can afford it. The assemblers might keep that going, were the klept to founder. But I don’t trust that some last convulsive urge to short-term profit, some terminal shortsightedness, mightn’t bring an end to everything.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 227</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>“Money,” Virgil said, “for Stets, is a by-product of satisfying his own curiosity. He’s still amazed that most people who do what he does are in it mainly for the money.</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 232</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>“They think they’re the only real continuum, the one original, not a stub. They discovered the so-called server first, whatever anomaly allows all this. But they didn’t invent it, just found it. Anybody knows what it really is, or where, they’re not telling.”</p>
<p>“Nobody knows what it is?”</p>
<p>“Nobody has the least fucking idea, or where the hardware is. Lot of people think China, but China’s just naturally where you’d guess something like that would be.”</p>
<p>“Why?”</p>
<p>“’Cause they opted to mostly go their own way, in the jackpot. They were big enough, the richest country, all set to do it. Just rolled up the carpet and closed the door for a couple decades. Didn’t need to evolve a klept, either.”</p>
<p>“Evolve what?”</p>
<p>“Klept. What runs the world that isn’t China, up the line where Lowbeer is. Hereditary authoritarian government, roots in organized crime. The jackpot seemed to filter that out of what was already happening, made it dominant.”</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 328</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Authoritarian societies are inherently corrupt, and corrupt societies are inherently unstable. Rule of thieves brings collapse, eventually, because they can’t stop stealing.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 395</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Joe-Eddy was seated opposite her, Caitlin on her right, Manuela on her left. Manuela had Carsyn to her left, and something was going on there. They definitely seemed to be enjoying one another’s company. The drone was standing to Joe-Eddy’s right, a few inches from the table, a chair having been removed for it. Stets was beside Caitlin, with Grim Tim, Sevrin, Kathy Fang, and Dixon making up the rest of the other side.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 399</div></div><p>These are mostly pretty one-dimensional characters, even after 300+ pages. Carsyn is wholly unknown. Manuella nearly so. Caitlin a close runner-up. Kathy and Dixon made a drone and drove around. For whatever reason, Gibson needs to list them all and assure us that the whole, big, happy family is together. I&rsquo;m picturing the stupid picnics at the end of all of the <em>Fast and the Furious</em> movies.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>“The president,” said Kathy Fang. “She got us out of it.” Verity saw Joe-Eddy smirk.</p>
<p>“Eunice says it was the president,” Verity said to him.</p>
<p>“The president,” said Kathy Fang, raising her coffee, and they all clinked mugs, toasting the president. Conner, in the drone, thrust its manipulator’s thumb-equivalents up in support, and she heard Ash’s voice join in as well.</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 400</div></div><p>I can&rsquo;t tell if Gibson&rsquo;s taking the piss or being nearly inconceivably lame.</p>
<p><hr></p>
<div class="footnote-reference"><span id="footnote_DRAFTABLE_ENTRY_4588_2_body" class="footnote-number">[2]</span> I wrote this was before the Twitter Files buried Russiagate for good—even among the idiots who&rsquo;d clung to it long after every conceivable bit of evidence had been disproved. </div>      </div>
      </div>
        <div class="footer">
    <div class="footer-data"><div class="footer-links"><ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/contact.php" title="">Contact</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/support.php" title="">Support</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/privacy.php" title="">Privacy</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/rights.php" title="">Rights</a></li></ul></div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="copyright">Copyright (c) 1999-2026 earthli.com. All Rights Reserved.</div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="versions">Powered by <ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore/app_news.php">earthli News 3.7</a></li><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore" title="">earthli WebCore&trade; 3.7</a></li></ul></div></div>    </div>
      </div>
  </div>  </body>
</html>
]]>
  </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
      <title type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[Termination Shock by Neal Stephenson (2021) (read in 2022)]]>
  </title>
    <id>https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=4559</id>
    <link href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=4559"/>
    <updated>2023-01-30T20:35:33+01:00</updated>
    <author>
        <name type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[Marco von Ballmoos]]>
  </name>
      <uri>https://earthli.com/users/marco</uri>
    </author>
      <summary type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<p><small class="notes">Standard disclaimer [1]</small></p>
<p><a href="https://www.earthli.com/data/news/attachments/entry/4559/terminationshockbookcover.jpg"><img src="https://www.earthli.com/data/news/attachments/entry/4559/terminationshockbookcover_tn.jpg" alt=" " class=" align-left"></a>As usual in a Neal Stephenson book, there&rsquo;s a lot going on. As usual in a Stephenson book of late, every single last character is possessed of a unique and ostensibly fascinating background, is confident, self-sufficient and self-reliant, interesting, eloquent, funny, smart,... [<a class="complete-text-link" href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=4559">More</a>]</p>
]]>
  </summary>
      <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<html lang="en">
  <head>
    <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/themes/ice.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/fonts/raleway.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/core/medium.css">
  </head>
  <body>
<div class="style-controls">  <div class="page">
    <div class="page-body">
<div class="info-box-top">
<p>
Published by <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_user.php?name=marco" title="Marco von Ballmoos" class="visible">marco</a> on <span class="date-time">30. Jan 2023 20:35:33 (GMT-5)</span>
</p>
</div>
      <div class="text-flow wide">
  <p><small class="notes">Standard disclaimer [1]</small></p>
<p><a href="https://www.earthli.com/data/news/attachments/entry/4559/terminationshockbookcover.jpg"><img src="https://www.earthli.com/data/news/attachments/entry/4559/terminationshockbookcover_tn.jpg" alt=" " class=" align-left"></a>As usual in a Neal Stephenson book, there&rsquo;s a lot going on. As usual in a Stephenson book of late, every single last character is possessed of a unique and ostensibly fascinating background, is confident, self-sufficient and self-reliant, interesting, eloquent, funny, smart, skilled, and almost invariably independently wealthy. Does that take a wee bit of the tension out of the book? You betcha.</p>
<p>There is the constant undertone that people who are not like the characters are guilty of having personally failed to be that awesome through <em>not trying hard enough</em>. Stephenson likes guns, libertarianism, and using ten words where one would suffice—my guess would be that he likes them in that order.</p>
<p>We meet Rufus Grant, a part-Comanche, mostly black ex-Army soldier-turned-rancher/drone-expert who&rsquo;d lost his wife and child to a giant wild boar whose species had gotten a massive upwind in the plains of Texas because of the horrific and ongoing effects of climate change. We learn a lot about guns, wild boars, and Texas geography with Rufus. It&rsquo;s not uninteresting, but it is a pretty long prologue to the action that is coming.</p>
<p>The action is a confluence of Rufus finally getting a shot at his arch-nemesis—a nearly unbelievably and unprecedentedly large wild boar named Snout—and Saskia and co. attempting to land their plane onto the same airstrip where Snout&rsquo;s herd is running for its life. Who is Saskia? She is the Queen of the Netherlands, flying her own plane on a secret mission to meet up with billionaire T.R. Schmidt, the <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lord_Mayor_of_London">Lord Mayor of London</a>, a billionaire from Singapore, extremely old money from Venice, and all of their associated partners, who are all incredibly gifted, fabulously intelligent, and breathtakingly attractive.</p>
<p>They are there to witness T.R.&lsquo;s opening ceremony for his geoengineering gun called Pina2bo, which boosts drones full of sulfur into the upper stratosphere in a continuous loop, with the drones falling back to Earth, flying home, being refilled with sulfur, and, finally, going for another ride into the upper atmosphere. Basically, Stephenson loves guns so much that he wrote an entire book about the biggest one he could think of.</p>
<p>There&rsquo;s an entire second plot—perhaps ¼ of the book—about Deep &ldquo;Laks&rdquo; Singh, a Punjab-Canadian Sikh who is an absolute master of gatka, a fighting style unique to the Punjab region. When he gets to India, he&rsquo;s so amazing at it that he&rsquo;s better than anyone there—because he tried harder? It takes him a bit of western-guy-traveling-in-the-Global-South to get to what&rsquo;s called the <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Line_of_Actual_Control">Line of Actual Control (LAC)</a> (<cite><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/">Wikipedia</a></cite>), which is kind of a weapons-free area along the border between China and India where skirmishes between Fortnite-like clans are allowed but nothing else. This is all filmed by drones and broadcast live on social media, with all of the attendant bullshit you would expect.</p>
<p>Saskia abdicates her throne to her daughter for reasons I can no longer remember, but her daughter is a thrilling millennial, to whom Saskia at least partially kowtows for being even more amazing she is. That&rsquo;s OK, though, because Saskia&rsquo;s now got one of Italy&rsquo;s richest men chasing her tight tail and also the Saudis are giving her super-expensive hydrogen-fueled airplanes, so she&rsquo;s jetting all over the world, supported by the governments who whole-heartedly approve of the kind of weather that seems to have been propagated by the initial attempts at geoengineering, but who the fuck knows because it&rsquo;s just a bunch of rich guys blowing chemicals into the atmosphere and claiming that they fixed the climate crisis, but are really looking for an angle through which to make more money, a usual, which is wholly unscientific, but is absolutely the libertarian wet dream, because that&rsquo;s the only way that anything ever gets done because government sucks, ammrite?</p>
<p>After the Chinese blow him off a mountaintop with a sound ray and he spends months convalescing and learning how to use the high-tech enhancements installed by top-flight Indian surgeons, Laks ends up working for the Indian government, which is none too thrilled about the side-effects of Pina2bo, which it blames for the late monsoon season. So they send him back to Vancouver to infiltrate the U.S. border, make his way to Texas, and take out Pina2bo. He does this with no small amount of success, though he is eventually blocked and felled by Rufus and a crew of eagle-trainers. I honestly feel like I could just type anything here and it would be just as believable as what actually happened in the book.</p>
<p>This is a one-sided book about how awesome it would be if billionaires, responsible for nearly every awesome thing about out lives already, were to just go ahead and fix the climate crisis with a bit of geoengineering, because <em>government</em> isn&rsquo;t going to do it.</p>
<p>I wrote notes to myself several times expressing amazement that I was 400, then 500, then 700 pages deep into the book without yet having pushed up against any awareness that there might be some nuance to the question of geoengineering. You do you, Neal, but this is just stupid-porn for techno-fabulists who believe that there&rsquo;s a straightforward technical solution to every problem that simply involves capital making more capital and definitely doesn&rsquo;t involve any reduction or restriction of consumption and, furthermore, doesn&rsquo;t involve dealing with the disgusting 99.9% of humanity who aren&rsquo;t extraordinarily rich or privileged by exactly the system that led the planet into this <em>cul de sac</em> in the first place. The only time we hear about anyone who might be opposed is in the third person to let us all know that they&rsquo;re naive babies who hate progress and billionaires.</p>
<p>Another thing that we barely ever hear about in this book is the United States. Without any explanation, it&rsquo;s just a complete non-entity in the future. There is neither hide nor hair of the oppressive U.S. Russia goes unmentioned. Africa and South America are, of course, absent. Only Europe and China figure into the future. The U.S. is represented by a world-saving billionaire, a toothless FAA and Rufus. The first—and pretty much <em>only</em>—mention of the United States is in the following passage, a throwaway comment that states without explaining.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The United States—which used to intervene in such situations—was a basket case and global laughingstock;&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 518</div></div><p>For a guy who can write an entire chapter on how Laks combs his hair, that this guy couldn&rsquo;t figure out how to say anything about how the United States is just not credible. I bet he&rsquo;s saving it for the third 800-page installment.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;T.R.’s phone had buzzed, and he had put on reading glasses. He looked at Willem over the lenses. “My granddad built a mine in Cuba. Castro took it away from him. Does that mean he shouldn’t have built it?” While Willem pondered this not uninteresting philosophical conundrum, […]&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 552</div></div><p>See what I mean? Absolutely nuance-free. It is <em>not</em> an interesting philosophical conundrum. It&rsquo;s bullshit for Stephenson to make the over-educated Willem think that it is. It is the same bullshit rich people always tell the world every chance they get. They want to convince everyone that they are rich because the world has rewarded them for being special—intelligent or driven or clever or wise—rather than for being lucky or privileged.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The initial pushback against what T.R. was doing here had more recently been muted by countervailing arguments around the idea of termination shock: the fear that if the gun stopped, it would lead to a backlash in the world’s climate system.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 586</div></div><p>And here he finally tells us what termination shock is: it means that all you have to do is be first and then no-one can stop you because stopping you would break things more than if you&rsquo;d never started. So, you get some facts on the ground and convince people &ldquo;termination shock&rdquo; is a thing so they&rsquo;re afraid of trying to stop you. Might everything have been less fucked had no-one started geoengineering? Perhaps…but the beauty is that <em>from where we are now (post-geoengineering)</em>, the best course of action is <em>to continue geoengineering</em>. Neat, right?</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;“It’s like, we’ve been in a car with a brick on the gas pedal and no one at the wheel, careening down the road, running over people and crashing into things. We’re still in the car. We can’t get out of the car. But someone could at least grab the wheel. T.R. ain’t the perfect man to grab it, but I don’t think his whole plan is just to fuck up the Punjab and starve India.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 655</div></div><p>Let&rsquo;s pretend that that&rsquo;s not a stupid analogy (because we don&rsquo;t need someone to grab the wheel; we need to <em>take our foot off the gas</em>). Let&rsquo;s pretend it&rsquo;s an alluring argument. OK. An accident people can live with. Once there&rsquo;s a driver, they&rsquo;re going to get blamed. Hiccups cost dozens of millions of lives. &ldquo;Oops&rdquo; and &ldquo;we&rsquo;re still figuring it out&rdquo; and &ldquo;they were going to die anyway&rdquo; and &ldquo;we have to do something&rdquo; don&rsquo;t cut the mustard. Whoever&rsquo;s driving—when they&rsquo;re wrong, they will have wasted time and resources making things worse. They don&rsquo;t consider that for a second in this book.</p>
<p>A better analogy for this book is: 100 people in a cave with supplies. Two take half of the supplies to go on a mission to find help. If they just decide on their own, is that right?</p>
<p>This is Stephenson&rsquo;s <em>Atlas Shrugged</em>. It&rsquo;s a fantasy about those all-powerful greens and animals-rights activists getting their comeuppance at the hands of underdog billionaires. These are the kind of people libertarians and objectivists choose to write about. It&rsquo;s billionaire fan-fic.</p>
<p>To be fair, and very rarely, an interesting insight sneak in.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;[…] they controlled a trillion dollars that had been earned by injecting carbon dioxide into the atmosphere.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 512</div></div><p>That&rsquo;s kind of a nice way of putting it. They created a tremendous amount of value while they were doing it, but they also knew most of the time that they were doing a lot of damage that was going to be very difficult to repair. The most important thing quickly became continued personal enrichment. Any costs that could be externalized, were—regardless of morality or ethics. They, as usual, didn&rsquo;t enter into it.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The first wave is a stopgap measure. Hurling enough SO2 into the stratosphere to begin making a difference. All well and good; when a house is on fire, you throw water on it. The second wave will be about tuning the distribution of the veil so as to achieve the results . . .” Saskia looked him in the eye. She got the idea he was about to conclude the sentence with “we want” but after the briefest of hesitations he said “that are most beneficial.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 527</div></div><p>Basically, the 99% have always been exploited and have little to no power. In arrogating power to themselves, a wealthy elite have started destroying the planet. No-one else had a say as they did so. Once the elite realized that they&rsquo;d broken things, they doubled down because that&rsquo;s how they stayed wealthy and powerful. Now that they also feel threatened, they will, once again, and autocratically, do what they want to protect their interests, all without so much as a by-your-leave from the long-suffering masses. It may be the only way forward for a benighted and congenitally vicious species, but it&rsquo;s not a democracy. Stop pretending that it is. People just have dictators they like and those they don&rsquo;t like. Like sports teams But most people like dictators. Most pick a side.</p>
<p>I&rsquo;ve read nearly everything he&rsquo;s written so far—<a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3213">Seveneves</a> in 2016, <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=2949">Reamde</a> in 2014, <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=2324">Anathem</a> in 2010, <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=1530">Cobweb</a> in 2007, <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=1206">The System of the World</a> in 2006, <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=1070">Confusion</a> in 2005, <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=1069">Confusion</a> in 2004, <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=1068">The System of the World</a> in 2003, Cryptonomicon in 2002 [2], and, finally, Diamond Age and the legendary Snow Crash sometime … even longer ago, long before I was keeping track of books I&rsquo;ve read or doing anything as elaborate as keeping notes about them.</p>
<p>This is probably the last book I&rsquo;ll read by Neal Stephenson for all of the reasons outlined above and noted in detail in witty ripostes to citations below. This is nothing more than a ridiculously long airport thriller. I have to admit I was speed-reading some sections. It&rsquo;s a 700-page setup for a sequel. The hubris is mind-boggling.</p>
<p><hr></p>
<div class="footnote-reference"><span id="footnote_DRAFTABLE_ENTRY_4559_1_body" class="footnote-number">[1]</span> Disclaimer: these are notes I took while reading this book. They include citations I found interesting or enlightening or particularly well-written. In some cases, I&rsquo;ve pointed out which of these applies to which citation; in others, I have not. Any benefit you gain from reading these notes is purely incidental to the purpose they serve of reminding me of what I once read. Please see Wikipedia for a summary if I&rsquo;ve failed to provide one sufficient for your purposes. If my notes serve to trigger an interest in this book, then I&rsquo;m happy for you.</div><h2>Citations</h2><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;During that time there was surprisingly little to do. She and Johan had trimmed the plane so that its weight exceeded the lift produced by its wings; in accordance with the laws of physics, this caused it to lose altitude in a steady and predictable manner.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 5</div></div><p>What the fuck kind of boring shit is this? No wonder this book is 700 pages long. I mean, this reads like it was written by ChatGPT. Neal, are you cheating? Or have you really become this pedantic and boring?</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The man began to unlimber his Kalashnikov but then there was a bang that made the queen go deaf in one ear. She looked up at Amelia in time to see her discharge a second round at the pig. The pig fell over and stopped moving, apart from some jerky nervous system mayhem about the legs. The man turned half around and favored Amelia with a nod. “Double tap was definitely your correct move, sister,” he remarked in a world-weary but agreeable tone, and once again turned his back on them.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 12</div></div><p>This is awful  writing, akin to that horseshit survivalist book I read from Gary once. I&rsquo;m surprised I didn&rsquo;t have to read about the exact caliber and number of shells.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;For years he’d been hunting Snout all over Texas. Now he knew almost exactly where the creature was. It could only move so fast. He and his herd would leave in their wake a wide trail of shit and damage; it would be as easy as tracking an armored division across a golf course.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 37</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Amelia was able to produce from her bag a pair of ordinary (not electronically enhanced) sunglasses with an old-school military look to them. Fenna unfolded them and slipped them onto Saskia’s face, carefully guiding the ends of the bows into the tight gap between her temples and the spandex hood.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 50</div></div><p>For the love of God, was there no editor on this book. This is a nearly autistic level of detail.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Fenna was braless, wiry, and heavily tattooed, so any lurkers watching from the scrub along the banks would have seen more, but not for long.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 51</div></div><p>WT-actual-F Neal. Are you thirteen years old?</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Fat orange and yellow extension cords coursed over the sand, obliging her to pick her feet up as she walked.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 56</div></div><p>Why would you write that? This is terrible. Are we supposed to think that she doesn&rsquo;t pick up her feet in the normal course of things? Is she high-stepping? Does it matter? Will these cables be relevant? Spoiler alert: they would not.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Could anything less sustainable be imagined? She was drinking water from a bottle made of petrochemicals. At three in the morning the temperature was still so high that humans could not sleep unless they ran air conditioners powered by generators that burned more petroleum. The generators and the air conditioners alike dumped more heat into the air.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 57</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Rufus, of course, knew her only as Saskia, and had introduced her as such to all of the Boskeys. It was a code name; but at the same time she felt in some ways that it was her true name, and she very much enjoyed being called it.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 59</div></div><p>I only cited a tiny bit here; this is the end of a chapter-length treatise on her name. Jesus.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The next, and last, time that Hendrik saw his father, Johannes was kneeling naked in the town square. He was blindfolded. On closer inspection, he was bandaged over the eye sockets, and the bandage was soaked and streaming with blood, because his eyes had been gouged out and tossed into a bucket along with a lot of other eyes of the wrong color. One of the young rebels had got a samurai sword and was going down the line cutting heads off. Johannes’s last words were “Leve de Koningin!” (“Long live the Queen!”).&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 79</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;They drank. Of course, they would hold the entire conversation in Dutch. “She sends this,” Willem said, and slid the queen’s note across the table. Hendrik somewhat laboriously fished out glasses and put them on, then unfolded the note and read it, as if it were an everyday occurrence for him to sit out in his gazebo perusing correspondence from crowned heads of Europe.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 85</div></div><p>This feels so awkward. He&rsquo;s trying so hard to emphasize how cool his characters are. I&rsquo;m afraid to go back to the Baroque Cycle or Cryptonomicon to discover that he&rsquo;s always been like this.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The Mississippi was about seven Rhines. When this spillway was wide open, it diverted two and a half Rhines into the lake.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 96</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Now, where Willem came from, a Rhine was sort of a big deal. A third of the Netherlands’ economy passed up and down one single Rhine. They had, in effect, built a whole country around it. Here, though, people were gunning their pickup trucks over a causeway bestriding two and a half Rhines just as a temporary diversion of a seven-Rhine river over yonder. It was one of those insane statistics about the scale of America that had once made the United States seem like an omnipotent hyperpower and now made it seem like a beached whale.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 96</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Willem glanced toward the adjoining high-rise district, sprouting from a low clutter of RVs and tents. “You’re right,” he said, “that is not a choice we have to make. Oh, fisheries are always problematic in all countries. But when we build coastal defenses, as a rule, we are creating jobs. Not obliterating valuable sources of employment.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 100</div></div><p>Nice lecture, Neal. What happened to you?</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Then Willem almost got them killed when he failed to notice stopped traffic on the highway ahead until it was nearly too late and had to stand on the brakes and make a controlled diversion onto the shoulder.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 122</div></div><p>WTF? He has a meter-precise virus-detection app, but personal vehicles no longer have radar and auto-braking?</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Saskia knew she’d looked to the example of Prince Harry and his American wife, Meghan, who had simply walked away, renounced their titles, and moved to the West Coast to live like normal humans.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 128</div></div><p>FFS. They&rsquo;re living like normal <em>multimillionaires</em> who will never want for anything, not like &ldquo;normal humans&rdquo;.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;This place, however, was about permanence. Permanence, and uniqueness. Every detail custom-built of polished old wood, wrought iron, sculpted marble. Original works of art wherever some decoration was wanted, living flowers arranged by human hands. That human effort immanent in every detail. Napkins folded just so, drinks hand-shaken and served with origami twists of citrus rind. People were expensive; the way to display, or to enjoy, great wealth was to build an environment that could only have been wrought, and could only be sustained from one hour to the next, by unceasing human effort. Saskia, with her staff, was as guilty of it as anyone, but she tended to forget about it until some event such as the journey down the Brazos reset her thinking.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 145</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;That kind of thinking—adjust the climate of the entire planet just to make things good for Venice—might have been very typical of Venice in, say, the twelfth century but was not what one expected today.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 151</div></div><p>But we&rsquo;ve already done exactly that: adjusted the climate of the world so that an elite could live extravagant lives.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;“The size of it. The sheer amount of steel in the ground. The engineering. The presence, Your Majesty, the physical mass and reality of it. Every strand of rebar was drawn out in a steel mill. Where’d the heat come from? Burning things. The cement was produced in kilns, biggest things you ever seen. How do we keep the kilns hot? Burning things. We put the steel and the concrete together to make these things, these freeway interchanges, just so cars can run on ’em. How do we keep the cars moving? Burning things.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 161</div></div><p>It is incredible and grotesque. A spectacular waste of resources immiserating mankind for the benefit of a few.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;“With all due respect, Your Majesty, it is as sustainable, or as unsustainable, as your whole country.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 162</div></div><p>It is literally making her country unsustainable. This is hogwash of the kind that Americans eat up. It <em>feels</em> true.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;As he said it, the twenty-six lanes of the Katy Freeway suddenly filled up with cars and trucks, countless thousands of them, moving along at moderate speed—not quite a traffic jam, but still with enough brake lights igniting here and there to temper the flow.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 162</div></div><p>Those thousands could all fit into two trains in that public-transport video, <a href="https://youtu.be/bQld7iJJSyk?t=113">Why Roads ALWAYS Fill Up, No Matter How Much We Widen Them</a> by <cite>Adam Something</cite> (<cite><a href="http://youtu.be/">YouTube</a></cite>).</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Standing at his side was his wife, Dr. Daia Kaur Chand, smartly but not flashily attired in pants and flats well adapted to a daylong program of clambering in and out of diverse vehicles.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 169</div></div><p>So superfluous.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;[…] she astonished and delighted their hosts by greeting them in a language that Saskia had to presume was Punjabi. Mohinder and his family didn’t have a Willem on staff to do advance research on everyone they were going to encounter over the course of a day and so it was a joyous surprise to them to discover that one of their guests shared their religion and spoke their language.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 169</div></div><p>So. Many. Words.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;These guys did look happy. A little older, whiter, maler, and squarer than techies in Sunnyvale or Amsterdam. Calmly, even serenely focused on what they were doing.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 179</div></div><p>Like <em>Uster</em> 😜.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;“Nope, water runs right through it,” T.R. said. He took a step back, extended his arms, and gave it the full Ozymandias.</p>
<p>&ldquo;“Sulfur!” he proclaimed, in the same tone that a conquistador might have said “Gold!”</p>
<p>&ldquo;“The stone that burns!”</p>
<p>&ldquo;Then he added, “S!,” which Saskia knew was an allusion to its symbol on the periodic table.&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 181</div></div><p>Was this book written by a committee? Also, water runs right through it, but what about wind? Didn&rsquo;t they just have a hurricane? Why is it in such a neat pile? In a normal sci-fi book, I wouldn&rsquo;t ask, but Stephenson makes such an effort to make you hyper-aware of how much research he&rsquo;s done, that it awakes the pedant in me.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Saskia knew the term at least as well as Bob. She was slower to respond, though, since she had been trained to think hard and choose her words carefully when any topic related to the Second World War came up in conversation.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 186</div></div><p>These constant ham-handed and tediously literal reminders of how smart people manage to look smart. This could have been, &ldquo;Saskia took her time in answering…&rdquo;</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;“You can buy that much sulfur for fifteen million dollars!?” Saskia was suddenly having to restrain an irrational urge to run out and buy a sulfur pile of her own.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 202</div></div><p>I know she&rsquo;s a queen. But please stop writing about the purchasing power of the wealthy so veneratively.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;He nodded. “Currently, further work on the project is blocked because it was found to be in violation of the European Directive on Birds.”</p>
<p>&ldquo;“Excuse me, did you say birds?”</p>
<p>&ldquo;“Yes.” Michiel gave a shy, wry smile. “That is only one such violation, to tell you the truth. Also, the construction of the MOSE sea gates disturbed aquatic life on the bottom of the Lagoon. Mussel populations were impacted across several hectares. Every time such a violation is found to have happened, it triggers the European Infraction Procedure.”&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 209</div></div><p>I see what he&rsquo;s suggesting here, but it&rsquo;s honestly ignoring shit like this (the environment) that got us into this mess in the first place (climate crisis).</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;“If folks all over the world are going to get riled up at billionaires messing with the climate even when we are not really doing a goddamn thing, then we got no real downside politically.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 222</div></div><p>True, if self-serving.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;“Even if we could get China and India to stop burning shit tomorrow, and crash their economies for the sake of Mother Earth,” T.R. said, “it wouldn’t undo what we’ve done, as a civilization, to the atmosphere since we first worked out how to turn fossil fuel into work.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 223</div></div><p>Once again, utterly failing to recognize his own country&rsquo;s still-massive per-capita output and its massive contribution to that historical CO2 debt.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Hell, in Afghanistan they even burn shit.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 224</div></div><p>Lots of places burn dung. Is this T.R.&lsquo;s blinkered view or the author&rsquo;s? The authorial style nearly forces me to wonder these things.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;“You’re saying that removing the carbon from the atmosphere would be a much bigger project than putting sulfur into it,” Saskia said. “We would have to make a pile of carbon the size of Mount Rainier. About thirty cubic miles. Imagine a cube a mile on a side, full of this stuff.” He rested his hand a little more gently on the carbon jar. “And now imagine thirty of those. To get that done in any reasonable amount of time—let’s say fifty years—you have to imagine a 747 cargo freighter loaded with pure elemental carbon dumping it onto the pile every nine seconds for fifty years, 24/7/365,”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 225</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;“The Greens,” Saskia said, “idolize nature and will want to say that if drought or deluge happens in Mali or Nebraska or Uttar Pradesh because of their carbon-sequestering forest, why, that is nature’s decree. Gaia’s just verdict. We must bow to it. But try telling that to the victims.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 227</div></div><p>This is absolutely not what &ldquo;The Greens&rdquo; think, but OK. Nature built us a cocoon. We don&rsquo;t know how to fine-tune it. We have only succeeded in making things worse so far. What reason do we have to hope that whatever we do with have a salutary rather deleterious effect?</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;He had shoulder-holstered his cricket bat so that its handle projected up behind his head, making him look (as he was no doubt well aware) like a character in a movie.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 235</div></div><p>Authors today write books as if they were screenplays</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;“The muzzle flash’ll catch your eye,” T.R. said. “But if you look at that, you’ll miss it. Shell’s already long gone. You got to look into the space above. Next one’s in 3 . . . 2 . . . 1 . . .” Saskia just glimpsed it, moving straight up at fantastic velocity, as the muzzle flared and extinguished below.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 260</div></div><p>Stephenson loves guns so much that he wrote an entire book about the biggest one he could think of.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;“He has a gift for the catchphrase,” Saskia said. “One can easily imagine him hawking these on YouTube. Texas Gold.”</p>
<p>&ldquo;“Jumpsuit Orange, if he’s not careful.”</p>
<p>&ldquo;“I have no idea as to the legalities. Do you?”&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 266</div></div><p>I don&rsquo;t care who that is; almost no European would come anywhere close to using that idiom. I know people way cooler than her who wouldn&rsquo;t know it, much less be able to use it.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;To extend Ilham’s analogy, if this was the Fellowship of the Ring, Laks was Aragorn, part man and part elf, equally capable of hanging out with Lord Elrond at the high table of Imladris or slamming down pints in a tavern in Bree.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 276</div></div><p>He&rsquo;s absolutely not part-elf. He&rsquo;s a Numenorian. Stephenson has an almost pathological drive to heap as many cool properties onto his characters as possible, but can&rsquo;t even get LOTR shit straight.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Until recently it had been necessary to drive all the way over Rohtang Pass, an infinity of switchbacks cresting at four thousand meters, then down an equal number of switchbacks into a hamlet on the upper Chenab at more like three thousand meters. From there the highway followed a maddeningly indirect route up into Ladakh, the water- and oxygen-starved province that bordered China.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 279</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;They drove over a pass that topped out at fifty-four hundred meters, and stopped at the little village there to take selfies and inject cash into the local economy, such as it was. Then they descended to a somewhat more survivable altitude of four thousand,&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 287</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;“Read it,” T.R. said, cutting him off. “I get it, this is your whaling ship, a place for everything and everything in its place. You the Captain Ahab of this little operation, then?”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 291</div></div><p>Everybody in this book has read—and remembered—Moby Dick. Nobody I know has read it, but everyone in this book has. It&rsquo;s a weird flex, to say the very least.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Even bicycles were almost overkill. Huis ten Bosch was just a few thousand strides from the edge of the North Sea. They could have walked to it briskly in less than an hour. On bicycles, trailed by security and support staff in cars, they covered the distance in minutes.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 301</div></div><p>In a windstorm. Surging hard enough to cause problems. Wind coming ashore. Headwind. No problem. You could have skipped this whole paragraph. It&rsquo;s unnecessary and inaccurate.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;“The cease-fire of 1962 put an end to armed conflict between India and China along their shared border—which remains disputed to this day. A peace agreement signed by Zhou Enlai and Jawaharlal Nehru referred not to the border but to the Line of Actual Control—a diplomatic phrasing that enabled the cease-fire to be formalized without either party acknowledging the other’s territorial claims.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 321</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;“Who doesn’t like it?” Rufus asked. “Other than folks who hate geoengineering on principle?” Alastair shrugged. “Any country whose ox is gored by the knock-on effects.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 354</div></div><p>This is not even close to nuanced. 700 pages and the only lip service paid to anyone who might be opposed is that they&rsquo;re naive babies who hate progress and billionaires.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Horseshoes and iron wheel rims clattered on the paving stones as it swept round in a wide curve—the turning radius of these things was atrocious—that took it up to the door below.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 365</div></div><p>His pedantry is legendary. He just can&rsquo;t seem to be able to help himself.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The dressmaker was drafting along behind Fenna, like a bike racer allowing a stronger rider to break the wind.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 367</div></div><p>Literally just defined &ldquo;drafting&rdquo;</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;With a moment’s reflection, of course, it was clear why Ilham—who still had family in Xinjiang—would not want to become world famous doing what Big Fish’s School was doing.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 399</div></div><p>We&rsquo;re 400 pages in and neither hide nor hair of the oppressive U.S. They are represented by a world-saving billionaire, a toothless FAA and Rufus.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;“I don’t care,” she said. “I’m not an environmentalist except insofar as it bears on those issues I do care about. Once we’ve gotten to the point where girls in developing countries are getting decent educations and being given control over their own bodies, then I’ll concern myself with T.R. McHooligan’s sulfur veil and its projected side effects. Maybe.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 420</div></div><p>Stephenson speaking his politics through other characters. He&rsquo;s all for freedom and letting billionaires sort things out. As if they weren&rsquo;t the reason there&rsquo;s anything to sort out in the first place.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;It was thus capable of servicing the very largest container ships in the world: absurdly enormous things, double the width of the biggest ship that could fit through the Panama Canal, that boggled Saskia’s mind whenever she came out here to look at them. It was the place where the economy of China made a direct umbilical connection to Europe. The ships were two dozen containers wide and drew twenty meters of water when fully loaded. Some of them, fresh in from Asia, would unload part of their burden here just so that they would ride higher in the water, making it possible for them to move on to smaller and shallower European ports.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 426</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;High mountains rising out of the jungle in the distance. And finally a huge hole in the ground, a spiraling roadway carved into its sloping walls, the size of it incomprehensible when you saw the motes spaced out along that road and understood that they were the largest trucks on Earth.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 436</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Willem spent a few minutes comparing wait times on various ride share apps. All disastrous. Then he tried to sort out the train schedules, which had been thrown into disarray. Finally he just got on his bicycle and rode the few kilometers. He didn’t even have to pedal. The wind pushed him there.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 438</div></div><p>How do you not just take the bike in the first place? 5km is 12 minutes at a reasonable pace. He probably pissed away longer than that on the ride-share apps. None of which involve sharing rides anyway.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;What does all this mean for China? It means that they can go on fueling their economy with coal and suppress its nastier side effects with geoengineering schemes of their own, while enjoying political cover from several countries in the West that might otherwise have raised a fuss. Good value for the money, if you ask me.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 455</div></div><p>China is reducing their use of coal faster than any other country, but don&rsquo;t let that get in the way of your jingoistic fantasy that all countries are as immoral as the U.S. , which is still suspiciously absent from this whole story.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The next he was looking a hundred kilometers into China.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 457</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;She finally became aware that all attention was focused on her. She tried to say something but couldn’t get it out. Instead she flicked her fingers over the surface of her tablet and spun it around so that everyone could see it.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 466</div></div><p>I just don&rsquo;t understand how it&rsquo;s the future and they no longer have AirPlay.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;“Nice enough afternoon,” he said. “Can I borrow a bicycle?”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 469</div></div><p>You rode one there that morning, no?</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The Schiphol project had been shitcanned partly because of protests from animal rights activists. Such people were, to put it mildly, neither common nor welcome on the Flying S, or any other West Texas, ranch.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 473</div></div><p>This is Stephenson&rsquo;s <em>Atlas Shrugged</em>. It&rsquo;s a fantasy about those all-powerful greens and animals-rights activists getting their comeuppance at the hands of underdog billionaires.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;And she was said to be as fluent in Punjabi as she was in English.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 495</div></div><p>Neal has forgotten that he&rsquo;d already bragged about this on her introduction.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;And Marco had brought with him his friend Pau, an activist from Barcelona—a city that, like Venice, was trying to get free of the country it had been lumped into.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 496</div></div><p>Don&rsquo;t hold back, fuckwit. Sure, just let any rich enclave excise itself from the mass of poors around it, who obviously had nothing to do with anyone&rsquo;s success.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The most prominent work on display was a Renaissance painting of Ceres in her winged chariot. The very goddess after whom cereals were named. She was flying over an idealized Tuscan landscape looking for her lost daughter Proserpina. Saskia knew the story perfectly well.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 496</div></div><p>Of course she knew that story. I&rsquo;d never heard of it, but I&rsquo;m a benighted peasant, not a queen.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;“In the scenario where Pina2bo is the only site of stratospheric sulfur injection in the whole world,” Michiel said, “and it runs at maximum capacity year-round, maybe that is the case. That is why we are bringing Vadan online later this year. And it’s why T.R. has begun work on Papua. Which adds a site in the Southern Hemisphere.” “How does that help us?” “Historically, volcanic eruptions south of the equator are associated with stronger monsoons.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 497</div></div><p>I keep waiting for the shoe to drop, but I don&rsquo;t sense any realistic concern about hubris coming anytime soon. They are all straight-faced about the utter predictability of targeted geoengineering.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;And the great and small powers of the world will have to mark them out on their chessboards and maybe even prepare for conflict. But if you suppose any of that is new, you don’t know history.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 500</div></div><p>So no revolution, but the same elites in control. A breathtaking arrogance, but not unexpected.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Once they were established in that waterfront bar with glasses of white wine and a plate of snails, Michiel squinted across the sun-sparkled water of the cove toward the fuel dock, then pulled his sunglasses down on his nose, looked over them at Saskia, and said, “Those men are fascinated by your Beaver. As am I.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 502</div></div><p><em>Bin ich im falschen Film?</em> This is a romance novel. And a poorly written one at that.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;[…] they controlled a trillion dollars that had been earned by injecting carbon dioxide into the atmosphere.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 512</div></div><p>That&rsquo;s kind of a nice way of putting it. They created a tremendous amount of value while they were doing it, but they also knew most of the time that they were also doing a lot of damage that was going to be very difficult to repair. The most important thing quickly became continued personal enrichment. Any costs that could be externalized, were. Regardless of morality or ethics. They didn&rsquo;t enter into it.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;“Absolutely. I crashed that plane to be sure.”</p>
<p>&ldquo;Alastair raised an eyebrow. “Some would blame the pigs.”</p>
<p>&ldquo;“Or the alligator that chased the pigs. Or the refugees who chased the alligator. Or the fire ants that burned out the relays in their air conditioners. You can go on spreading the blame as far as you like. But I was flying the plane. The buck stops at the pilot’s chair.”</p>
<p>&ldquo;“Formally, it was your responsibility,” Alastair agreed. “And yet at some level you feel that the universe owes you a free jet airplane.”</p>
<p>&ldquo;“I’d never come out and say it like that. But yes.”&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 516</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The United States—which used to intervene in such situations—was a basket case and global laughingstock;&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 518</div></div><p>Literally the first time he&rsquo;s mentioned the U.S.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Saskia had to suppress an impulse to confess that she no longer had “people” in that sense of the term. She was meaning to get some sooner or later. She could support a modest staff. But, for now, she was still enjoying the simplicity and freedom of not being anyone’s boss.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 520</div></div><p>These are the kind of people libertarians and objectivists choose to write about. It&rsquo;s billionaire fan-fic.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;A good many of those huge container ships were, she knew, bound to or from Maasvlakte, the only port capable of accommodating them.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 522</div></div><p>Hasn&rsquo;t Rotterdam just been destroyed? No effect on shipping? This is incoherent. And remember, Neal, your pedantry made me read you like this.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Fahd made a faint grimace and tossed one hand as if shooing something away. “We are buying what they are selling, no more,” he said. “Chinese aid comes at a high price—a price we don’t need to pay.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 524</div></div><p>JFC Neal.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The first wave is a stopgap measure. Hurling enough SO2 into the stratosphere to begin making a difference. All well and good; when a house is on fire, you throw water on it. The second wave will be about tuning the distribution of the veil so as to achieve the results . . .” Saskia looked him in the eye. She got the idea he was about to conclude the sentence with “we want” but after the briefest of hesitations he said “that are most beneficial.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 527</div></div><p>Basically, the 99% have always been exploited and have little to no power. In arrogating power to themselves, a wealthy elite have started destroying the planet. No-one else had a say as they did so. Once the elite realized that they&rsquo;d broken things, they doubled down because that&rsquo;s how they stayed wealthy and powerful. Now that they also feel threatened, they will, once again, and autocratically, do what they want to protect their interests, all without so much as a by your leave from the long-suffering masses. It may be the only way forward for a benighted and congenitally vicious species, but it&rsquo;s not a democracy. Stop pretending that it is. People just have dictators they like and those they don&rsquo;t like. Like sports teams But most people like dictators. Most pick a side.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Saskia peeked over the shoulder of a man with close-cropped, sandy hair and a deeply tanned neck as he fluidly worked his way through the user interface of a coffee machine. By the time he had finished, she had an idea what to do, and without too much floundering was able to get away with a decent enough macchiato.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 527</div></div><p>What a waste of text. Who the fuck cares what that guy looks like? You could have just written: Saskia got a cup of coffee. Or not. Who cares if she has coffee?</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;But having seen shit you wouldn’t believe in Indonesia, he had arrived at the conclusion that political stability anywhere was an illusion that only a simpleton would believe in. That (invoking, here, a version of the anthropic principle) such simpletons only believed they were right when and if they just happened to live in places that were temporarily stable. And that it was better to live somewhere obviously dangerous, because it kept you on your toes. Willem had thought all this daft until Trump and QAnon.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 534</div></div><p>Ya know, ya started strong. The U.S. has always been crazy and mean for those who paid attention.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;His Green instincts, drilled into him by a life spent in a modern Western social democracy, told him to be outraged by what the miners had done to this part of the planet. But he knew that every wind turbine feeding green electricity into the Netherlands’ grid had copper windings in its generator and copper cables connecting it to the system. And that the copper had come from here.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 545</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Not for the first time, Willem was awed, staggered, and even a little humiliated by the sheer scale at which the oil and mining industries operated—year in, year out, in a way that was basically invisible to the people on the other side of the world who benefited from what they were doing, and who funded these works, every time they checked their Twitter.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 549</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Bad things tend to be localized in time and space. Harder to predict. But we can predict them to some extent. And the more sites we have operational, the more knobs and levers we have on the dashboard, so to speak. So instead of just blundering around we are managing the situation to maximize the good and minimize the bad.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 551</div></div><p>550 pages in and still on the same track. No awareness that there might be some nuance to it. This is nothing more than a ridiculously long airport thriller. I have to admit I&rsquo;m speed-reading some sections now.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;T.R.’s phone had buzzed, and he had put on reading glasses. He looked at Willem over the lenses. “My granddad built a mine in Cuba. Castro took it away from him. Does that mean he shouldn’t have built it?” While Willem pondered this not uninteresting philosophical conundrum, […]&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 552</div></div><p>Jfc. Absolutely nuance-free. It is not an interesting philosophical conundrum. It is the same bullshit rich people always tell the world whenever they get a chance. They want to convince everyone that they are rich because the world has rewarded them for being special—intelligent or driven or clever or wise—rather than for being lucky.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;“that it is just what people want of us. They want us to follow orders and put ourselves in harm’s way. On their behalf. ‘Oh look, those weirdos turn out to be useful to have around.’ We are useful, in other words, for going to the front lines and getting killed. So they are happy to overlook the turbans and so on.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 559</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;There had been no drones shadowing him in Canada, but apparently the United States was a different story. It was, as all the world knew, a completely insane and out-of-hand country, unable to control itself. Men like the Texan could get away with anything;&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 572</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;He opened up his bag and found basic toiletries, including a small wooden comb. Traditionally this would have been tucked into his hair, but the circumstances of the wet suit and so on had not allowed it. He used this to comb out the hair that was still long and to remove strands that had naturally broken or fallen out.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 575</div></div><p>An entire paragraph about how combing hair works. I&rsquo;m dumbfounded.</p>
<p>I stand corrected. It would go on for multiple paragraphs.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;“Yes,” Bo said, waving away Willem’s annoying cavils. “Now the situation seems quite out of hand. Copper prices have spiked, threatening our economic interests. There is also concern that shipments of coal and iron ore from Australia may be threatened. In the old days we might have looked to the United States or Great Britain to intervene. But those days are behind us, I think you’ll agree.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 580</div></div><p>Subtly suggesting that the reason for intervention is after something has gone wrong rather than to simply take things over to get them cheaper or free.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The initial pushback against what T.R. was doing here had more recently been muted by countervailing arguments around the idea of termination shock: the fear that if the gun stopped, it would lead to a backlash in the world’s climate system.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 586</div></div><p>Get facts on the ground and convince people &ldquo;termination shock&rdquo; is a thing so they&rsquo;re afraid of trying to stop you.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The guy with the Bug-Solv in his eyes had got to his knees. To his credit he was still observing correct trigger discipline; his cocked revolver was pointed straight up and his finger was laid alongside the cylinder. He had his face buried in the crook of his other arm. He lifted his head. If it made sense to describe a motion of the eyelids as violent, then he was blinking violently. He was trying to see something.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 592</div></div><p>This is but a small sample of the logorrhea of this eight-page description of a fight. It&rsquo;s not exciting. It&rsquo;s boring. It&rsquo;s like reading a technical report. No tension.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Conor, displaying admirably good knees and leg muscles, stood straight up and looked through the mesh wall of the lift,&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 645</div></div><p>It&rsquo;s just pathological at this point. Conor is a tech, an incidental character. I. Do. Not. Care. How good he is at standing up. Does anyone?</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;“We are at war,” Rufus said. “Gonna ride to the sound of the guns. Leaving before daybreak, I reckon.”</p>
<p>&ldquo;“The guns aren’t making any sound!” Carmelita objected. Rufus sighed.</p>
<p>&ldquo;“It is a Civil War joke. Not so funny apparently. It means I need to go to where the action is gonna be. Pina2bo.”&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 651</div></div><p>Lovely initial line, ruined by over-explaining it. I guess he saved me the trouble of looking it up.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;“It’s like, we’ve been in a car with a brick on the gas pedal and no one at the wheel, careening down the road, running over people and crashing into things. We’re still in the car. We can’t get out of the car. But someone could at least grab the wheel. T.R. ain’t the perfect man to grab it, but I don’t think his whole plan is just to fuck up the Punjab and starve India.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 655</div></div><p>An alluring argument, of course. But. An accident people can live with. Once there&rsquo;s a driver, they&rsquo;re going to get blamed. Hiccups cost dozens of millions of lives. &ldquo;oops&rdquo; and &ldquo;we&rsquo;re still figuring it out&rdquo; and &ldquo;they were going to die anyway&rdquo; and &ldquo;we have to do something&rdquo; don&rsquo;t cut the mustard. If they&rsquo;re wrong, they wasted time and resources making things worse. They don&rsquo;t consider that for a second in this book. 100 people in a cave with supplies. Two take half of it to go on a mission to find help. If they just decide on their own, is that right?</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;By the time Laks climbed back into his six-rotor flying chariot, it had become a five-rotor flying chariot.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 655</div></div><p>Instead of writing that &ldquo;a spent pin2ubo shell had perhaps unluckily but perhaps inevitably found the drone when it couldn&rsquo;t land in a net that was no longer there&rdquo;, we get four or five pages of tedious explanation that ended in the sentence above.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Piet was a rucker, meaning a practitioner of a sport that consisted of putting on a backpack loaded with weights and then covering ground on foot in open country.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 661</div></div><p>He already told us this, too. So literal.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;“They’re gonna do what’s in their national interest. Always have, always will. You think China didn’t have its eye on that copper mine before I started building a gun there? The gun was a pretext, that’s all. Does that mean I oughta do nothing? When I got the means to do something?”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 695</div></div><p>I&rsquo;m losing the thread of his politics…it&rsquo;s quite muddled, incoherent even.</p>
<p><hr></p>
<div class="footnote-reference"><span id="footnote_DRAFTABLE_ENTRY_4559_2_body" class="footnote-number">[2]</span> H/T to Peo for the recommendation.</div>      </div>
      </div>
        <div class="footer">
    <div class="footer-data"><div class="footer-links"><ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/contact.php" title="">Contact</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/support.php" title="">Support</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/privacy.php" title="">Privacy</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/rights.php" title="">Rights</a></li></ul></div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="copyright">Copyright (c) 1999-2026 earthli.com. All Rights Reserved.</div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="versions">Powered by <ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore/app_news.php">earthli News 3.7</a></li><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore" title="">earthli WebCore&trade; 3.7</a></li></ul></div></div>    </div>
      </div>
  </div>  </body>
</html>
]]>
  </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
      <title type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[They Were Soldiers: How the Wounded Return from America's Wars by Ann Jones (2013) (read in 2022)]]>
  </title>
    <id>https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=4538</id>
    <link href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=4538"/>
    <updated>2023-01-29T16:05:39+01:00</updated>
    <author>
        <name type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[Marco von Ballmoos]]>
  </name>
      <uri>https://earthli.com/users/marco</uri>
    </author>
      <summary type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<p><small class="notes">Standard disclaimer [1]</small></p>
<p><a href="https://www.earthli.com/data/news/attachments/entry/4538/they_were_soldiers_ann_jones_book_cover.jpg"><img src="https://www.earthli.com/data/news/attachments/entry/4538/they_were_soldiers_ann_jones_book_cover_tn.jpg" alt=" " class=" align-left"></a>This is a wonderfully written and incredibly honest and sobering look at how America treats what it clearly considers to be detritus—the dead and the wounded from its wars. On the one hand, there is an incredible respect and attention to detail for the dead and wounded. The... [<a class="complete-text-link" href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=4538">More</a>]</p>
]]>
  </summary>
      <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<html lang="en">
  <head>
    <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/themes/ice.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/fonts/raleway.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/core/medium.css">
  </head>
  <body>
<div class="style-controls">  <div class="page">
    <div class="page-body">
<div class="info-box-top">
<p>
Published by <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_user.php?name=marco" title="Marco von Ballmoos" class="visible">marco</a> on <span class="date-time">29. Jan 2023 16:05:39 (GMT-5)</span>
</p>
</div>
      <div class="text-flow wide">
  <p><small class="notes">Standard disclaimer [1]</small></p>
<p><a href="https://www.earthli.com/data/news/attachments/entry/4538/they_were_soldiers_ann_jones_book_cover.jpg"><img src="https://www.earthli.com/data/news/attachments/entry/4538/they_were_soldiers_ann_jones_book_cover_tn.jpg" alt=" " class=" align-left"></a>This is a wonderfully written and incredibly honest and sobering look at how America treats what it clearly considers to be detritus—the dead and the wounded from its wars. On the one hand, there is an incredible respect and attention to detail for the dead and wounded. The wounded are offered incredible levels of care—right up until they are no longer in danger of dying, but can no longer be of any conceivable use to the military, at which point they are dropped like hot rocks and treated like pariahs.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Doctors and the military command often find themselves at cross purposes because doctors want to save lives, not patch people up for demolition in the next battle, while the generals want their soldiers back.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 48</div></div><p>The dead are scooped into bags when they have been rendered into what are essentially unidentifiable pieces of flesh by bomb-blasts or rocket-attacks. When multiple people are blown to smithereens near each other, the giblets are split into the bags evenly and everyone involved pretends that it matters that they did this.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;At first, Mortuary Affairs specialists were asked to fingerprint the dead and submit the results on a printed form, but many of the dead had no fingers, while other fingers were attached to no body. Sometimes the Mortuary Affairs specialists found on a dismembered corpse a pocket with a wallet containing ID, sometimes a name printed on a shirt, sometimes a dog tag carried in a boot. With that to go on, they tried to match up the parts. But a lot of the parts were “just meat.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 11</div></div><p>Ann Jones has seen things. She has come to the following conclusion,</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;[…] war is obsolete. Most nations don’t make war anymore, except when coerced by the United States to join some spurious “coalition.” The earth is so small, and our time here so short. No other nation on the planet makes war as often, as long, as forcefully, as expensively, as destructively, as wastefully, as senselessly, or as unsuccessfully as the United States. No other nation makes war its business.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 4</div></div><p>It&rsquo;s kind of hard to conceive of what this trillion-dollar-per-year machine—this engine of war—is like, what it feels like, but Jones does a good job,</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;We were inside the American military bubble that encompasses more than 1,000 bases around the world of all sizes and strategic shapes, but all more or less alike in fundamentals. American planes carry American equipment and American soldiers from one base to another inside that bubble.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 28</div></div><p>War is lucrative for some, for an &ldquo;elite&rdquo; (definitionally). They benefit, but everyone else loses. For those who were in a war—who actually fought and were wounded—it doesn&rsquo;t end. Those wounds are, in many cases, psychological.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Of the 300,000 Americans who fought in World War I, 50,000 were still hospitalized for psychiatric disorders 20 years later. The violence of war does not end, even when peace is declared. Often it merely recedes from public to private life.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 6</div></div><p>Not only does war kill people—damaging others for the rest of their lives—but any medical advances spun off as a result of spending billions to keep soldiers alive also end up accruing only to those rich enough to afford them. The resource drain on the rest of society is tremendous—and it never really flows back, in any significant way.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;It’s possible, even likely, that for all military medicine contributes to specialized skills, it actually detracts from civilian medicine by diverting resources, research, and personnel from medical practices more relevant and applicable to the general good.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 64</div></div><p>Jones starts off in Bagram, where,</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;[…] Craig Hospital is not only a Level III Trauma Center, but also the medevac pathway to Landstuhl Regional Medical Center in Germany and beyond to the United States.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 32</div></div><p>Here we learn that a Level III trauma center is pretty amazing, but nothing in comparison to the Level IV care you can get in Landstuhl, or the Level V level of care waiting if you can be stabilized enough to make it back to the continental U.S.</p>
<p>From Bagram, she flies on a military transport with several medical personnel who accompany soldiers being flown to Landstuhl, some of them in high-tech coffin-like apparatuses that keep them alive despite nature&rsquo;s best efforts.</p>
<p>From Landstuhl, she flies to Virginia, visiting the main military medical centers, She interviews many people throughout the country: soldiers, veterans, and their families.</p>
<p>There are interesting tidbits scattered throughout this book, like that there are <span class="quote-inline">&ldquo;245,000 U.S. service members and their families in the European Command&rdquo;</span>. This is an amazing bit of information, pointing more to the degree to which the U.S. continues to occupy Europe. I bet there aren&rsquo;t any European army members stationed in the U.S.</p>
<p>Although the book provides a wealth of information, detail, and stories about the what it says on the tin—America&rsquo;s wounded soldiers—Jones deals also with how these soldiers are deliberately broken, kept from being human beings, told that they&rsquo;re not regular citizens, but … better.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Current basic training gives the formula one significant twist: while impressing upon the soldier his inferiority to his military masters, it swells his sense of superiority over others—women, weaker men, “lesser” races, designated enemies, and civilians.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 94</div></div><p>The military is an odious organization, not only in how it treats its own soldiers, but in how it regards pretty much everyone else in society.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Military leaders called to account told a Congressional hearing that soldiers’ suicides were “triggered” by various “stressors.” Number one was “relationship issues,” a term that in military usage places the blame on wives and girlfriends. It’s code for “bitches” who aren’t “faithful” and “whores” who send Dear John letters by email.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 102</div></div><p>The blame for a skyrocketing suicide rate isn&rsquo;t the horror of unending war and imperial terrorism, but women—because why not? No military has ever been a &ldquo;buck stops here&rdquo; kind of organization. Instead, everyone else is to blame but them.</p>
<p>Naturally, this isn&rsquo;t a good way of problem-solving—when you attack the wrong perpetrator, you necessarily leave the real perpetrator alone—but that doesn&rsquo;t seem to prevent the military from being showered with more and more money every year.</p>
<p>No-one with their hands on the pursestrings cares at all about how misogynistic, anti-humanistic, and racist the military is—or how dangerous these people are when they come home. Even just among military members, the sheer number of broken people is incredible.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;By 2012, some 663,000 veterans of the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan were classed as having partial or complete service-connected disabilities—that’s one of every four of the 2.3 million who served in those wars.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 111</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;One third of the soldiers in the Army were on prescription medications in 2010, and nearly half of them—76,500—were on opioid painkillers.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 114</div></div><p>This only tells part of the story, though. Since most soldiers are male, the task of caring for these broken men falls to their wives and girlfriends, who are expected to give everything of themselves and expect nothing back—certainly not appreciation or, God forbid, wages—all the while encouraging their partners to re-enlist and provide more value for the military. Any spouse who doesn&rsquo;t toe the line feels the full weight of the military&rsquo;s disapproval.</p>
<p>The military is ruining an entire generation of Americans, but what strikes me about this book is that <em>they at least have some health-care</em>, unlike any of their civilian peers. I&rsquo;m reminded that the U.S. military is a socialist organization—once you&rsquo;re in, everything is taken care of: food, housing, entertainment, education, health-care. The latest budget even includes a cost-of-living adjustment in military wages, unlike pretty much everyone else in the country.</p>
<p>It&rsquo;s an extraordinarily successful business that funnels a nearly endless supply of money from public coffers into private pockets.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;They know that a clever person just needs to find the right racket to profit endlessly from America’s endless wars. So many do. That, too, has become the new normal.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 116</div></div><p>While the military has nearly endless funding, it has almost no oversight, so you can just spend, spend, spend all day long—but you don&rsquo;t have to prove that that money&rsquo;s even going anywhere more useful than your own pocket. Despite the enormous budgets, U.S. bases are staffed on the cheap:</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Tens of thousands of workers, recruited often with false promises of high wages in posh places like Dubai, paid high fees to recruiters only to find themselves in Iraq or Afghanistan, confined within bases, often stripped of their passports, with no recourse but to work for next to nothing.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 162</div></div><p>This is why no-one really cares about Qatar&rsquo;s hiring practices: because businesses like the U.S. military use the exact same hiring practices to staff its bases with cheap, foreign labor. It&rsquo;s almost certainly not alone in doing so. I imagine larger petrochemical companies are staffed in a similar manner.</p>
<p>Whereas staff are hired on the cheap, soldiers can be rewarded if they morph into mercenaries, often quintupling their wages. Why would the military do this? The added benefit that they are no longer part of the official U.S. occupying force is worth a lot. In this way, the U.S. tells itself fairy tales about how, on paper, there are no soldiers or military presence in a country—despite dozens of thousands of mercenaries being stationed there in the employ of the U.S., to say nothing of the enormous staff needed to keep the whole thing going.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The percentages shift as deployments change, making for slippery and often deceptive statistics. For example, the report noted that only 45,000 American troops were then left in Iraq, but it somehow neglected to mention that a shadow army of 64,250 private contractors still remained.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 164</div></div><p>But the U.S. manages to convince at least itself that having removed all members of the so-called volunteer army amounts to no longer having imperial ambitions in a country. The more gullible and sycophantic allies quickly agree, while the rest of the world pulls back in disgust, but unable to do anything about this 800-pound gorilla that spends as much on its military as the next nine or ten nations combined and seems 10x as willing to use violence as any other country.</p>
<p>Jones does a tremendous job of conveying the suffering of not just the soldiers of the imperial army,</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;[…] those kids who drank the recruiters’ Kool-Aid and died, and those who still bravely soldier on with their brand-new titanium legs and blasted genitals and decommissioned brains.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 169</div></div><p>…but also their families, whose lives are ruined, and for what?</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;At Walter Reed Army Medical Center, in 2011, I met a woman from a small town in West Virginia, the mother of a 19-year-old soldier whose legs and genitals were blasted to pulp in Afghanistan. She quit her job and moved to a motel near the hospital, then in Washington D.C., to care for him, while her husband worked a second job at home to make up for part of her lost wages. She had been at the hospital for six months. She hoped to bring her son home someday—perhaps in another year or so—and she expected to take care of him for the rest of his life, or hers. She said, “People expect me to be happy that he survived, and I believe I am, but I can’t really remember what happy feels like.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 169</div></div><p>If this is how the citizens of the conquering country feel, imagine what stories we would hear from those who ended their days at the end of a rifle wielded by one of these soldiers when he could still walk.</p>
<p>Imagine the suffering imposed on countries whose only crime was to have elected governments whose politics didn&rsquo;t sit well with those of the imperialist ruling elite of the U.S., who think that every other country&rsquo;s purpose is to either provide an amenable and uncomplaining and easily exploited market for U.S. products (usually weapons or some other societally unhealthy good) or to provide their raw materials, resources, and labor at low cost or just for free.</p>
<p>Or perhaps they are to &ldquo;willingly&rdquo; exchange these for the comfort of knowing that they may bask in the glow of American beneficence for an evanescent moment before, in a fit of pique, of mercurial capriciousness, they are beaten down anyway, and everything that they hold dear taken from them.</p>
<p>The actions of empire are indistinguishable from piracy. An empire only pays for that which it cannot steal. Although an empire&rsquo;s own citizens are of (almost) no concern to it, it is those under the heel of the empire&rsquo;s boot who suffer the most.</p>
<p>But this isn&rsquo;t a book about them, not really. It isn&rsquo;t that Jones doesn&rsquo;t care—she&rsquo;s written a lot about the rest of the world&rsquo;s suffering, too, and she writes a bit here—but that the book is here to tell us that when war is afoot, when the military rides high, there are no winners. Everything is chewed up and spit out by an uncaring maw, hungry only for the next profit it can excrete in the direction of the tiny elite that always benefit from suffering.</p>
<p><hr></p>
<div class="footnote-reference"><span id="footnote_DRAFTABLE_ENTRY_4538_1_body" class="footnote-number">[1]</span> Disclaimer: these are notes I took while reading this book. They include citations I found interesting or enlightening or particularly well-written. In some cases, I&rsquo;ve pointed out which of these applies to which citation; in others, I have not. Any benefit you gain from reading these notes is purely incidental to the purpose they serve of reminding me of what I once read. Please see Wikipedia for a summary if I&rsquo;ve failed to provide one sufficient for your purposes. If my notes serve to trigger an interest in this book, then I&rsquo;m happy for you.</div><h2>Citations</h2><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;[…] war is obsolete. Most nations don’t make war anymore, except when coerced by the United States to join some spurious “coalition.” The earth is so small, and our time here so short. No other nation on the planet makes war as often, as long, as forcefully, as expensively, as destructively, as wastefully, as senselessly, or as unsuccessfully as the United States. No other nation makes war its business.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 4</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Of the 300,000 Americans who fought in World War I, 50,000 were still hospitalized for psychiatric disorders 20 years later. The violence of war does not end, even when peace is declared. Often it merely recedes from public to private life.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 6</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;At first, Mortuary Affairs specialists were asked to fingerprint the dead and submit the results on a printed form, but many of the dead had no fingers, while other fingers were attached to no body. Sometimes the Mortuary Affairs specialists found on a dismembered corpse a pocket with a wallet containing ID, sometimes a name printed on a shirt, sometimes a dog tag carried in a boot. With that to go on, they tried to match up the parts. But a lot of the parts were “just meat.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 11</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;the Mortuary Affairs specialists, who know much more than the average soldier about death in war, are mostly ruined. Goodell summed up her view of war this way: “War is disgusting and horrific. It never leaves the people who were involved in it. The damage is far greater than the lists of casualties or cost in dollars. It permeates lifestyles. It infects cultures and people and worldviews. The war is never over for us. The fighting stops. The troops get called back. But the war goes on for those damaged by war.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 21</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;My minder’s advertised purpose is to guide and inform me on this trip to Afghanistan, but he seems never to have been out of the States before himself. He drags an immense suitcase full of well-pressed uniforms, and lugs a bulky camera bag, a fat expandable attaché, and a leather case containing a computer with no international adapter. At Ramstein, foiled by European electrical sockets and his own locked American cell phone, he complains that Germany doesn’t have “up to date electricity” or a “modern phone system.” “I guess this is what they mean by Old Europe,” he says. He is my own perilously innocent personal public affairs officer, in way over his head, but a soldier nonetheless, and so he politely does his job. Already he is fast asleep.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 26</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;We were inside the American military bubble that encompasses more than 1,000 bases around the world of all sizes and strategic shapes, but all more or less alike in fundamentals. American planes carry American equipment and American soldiers from one base to another inside that bubble.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 28</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Those in danger of losing their lives, limbs, or eyes take priority, and most of them are brought to Bagram because Craig Hospital is not only a Level III Trauma Center, but also the medevac pathway to Landstuhl Regional Medical Center in Germany and beyond to the United States.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 32</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;By the end of the Soviet occupation, Afghanistan had been strewn with more landmines than anyplace else on earth, and demining never progressed very far. More than two decades later, landmines still kill or disable Afghans at the rate of 30 to 60 every month. Afghans know that walking around in the countryside is dangerous, but when American generals resurrected counter-insurgency (COIN) doctrine from the disastrous war in Vietnam, they ordered soldiers to get out of their vehicles and conduct “dismounted patrols” in places farmers knew enough to leave alone.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 35</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Doctors and the military command often find themselves at cross purposes because doctors want to save lives, not patch people up for demolition in the next battle, while the generals want their soldiers back.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 48</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;At least ten times bigger than Bagram’s Craig Hospital with ten times the staff, LRMC cares for an amazing array of patients, suggesting the scope of the empire it serves: from thousands of retired U.S. military personnel who live permanently in Europe—more than 6,000 in Germany alone—to an unknown number of civilians from 47 countries under private contract to the Department of Defense, plus 245,000 U.S. service members and their families in the European Command, as well as “all injured U.S. service members and [private] contractors” and members of 44 coalition forces serving in Afghanistan, Iraq, and Africa Command, Central Command, European Command, and Pacific Command.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 58</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The trauma chief says, “Civilian doctors have opportunities here to practice surgeries more complex than anything they’ve done before. They will carry that knowledge back to their practices in the States and improve the quality of medicine there.” Maybe so, but I wonder if this is to be the civilians’ reward for paying taxes into the war chest: the possibility of getting a combat-experienced brain surgeon when we’re shot in the head at the mall.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 63</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;I’m certain that when the urological surgeon cut off the penis of his first surgical patient at Bagram and discarded it in a bin of surgical waste he wasn’t thinking that this technique would advance his career or the state of urological surgery in American civilian hospitals.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 63</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;Even as military doctors, they all have professional interests quite different from the bloody salvage work they are asked to do. In stateside life, one doctor is a pediatrician, another a breast cancer specialist, another a urological oncologist; one neurologist does advanced research on Parkinson’s disease, another on Alzheimer’s.</p>
<p>&ldquo;Just as they were assigned to military hospitals downrange, the Department of Defense awarded generous grants of taxpayer money to insure that civilian researchers back in the United States would shift their focus to military needs, suspending work on cognition to study TBI, for example, or giving up lung cancer research to study the carcinogenic effects of toxic smoke at burn pits on U.S. military bases.&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 63</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Some advances paid for by taxpayers, such as new electronic prosthetics, are the exclusive property of the military, and so expensive that even when they eventually find their way into private civilian medicine they probably won’t be widely available. It’s possible that the chief of trauma surgery has things backwards. It’s possible, even likely, that for all military medicine contributes to specialized skills, it actually detracts from civilian medicine by diverting resources, research, and personnel from medical practices more relevant and applicable to the general good.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 64</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;To stop the convulsive effort to breath[e], the doctor can paralyze him and let the ventilator do the work of respiration, but that means removing from his intestine the feeding tube pumping in the calories he needs to heal these catastrophic wounds. It’s a fine line, and the team walks it for the next hour until it’s clear the man needs rest more than nourishment. Then the doctor administers a drug, the body grows still as stone, and the soldier inside sleeps softly while the ventilator steadily breathes in and breathes out.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 69</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;He doesn’t think much of military bosses or politicians or Americans in general who send the lowliest one percent to fight wars that make the other one percent, on the high end, “monufuckinmentally rich.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 73</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;“So what’s to love?”</p>
<p>&ldquo;“Shit. You don’t even know, do ya? Shootin’ people. Blowin’ shit up. It’s fuckin’ fun. I fuckin’ love it.”</p>
<p>&ldquo;I search his voice for a boy’s bravado, but I hear intensity and a kind of hyperactive glee. I say, “I believe you really mean that.”</p>
<p>&ldquo;“No shit,” he says. “I’m trying to educate you.”&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 76</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Before I leave the room, I spend some few long minutes sinking my fingers into the fur of the ginger-colored golden retriever who slumbers at the edge of the platform, the therapy dog whose dumb animal presence is meant to make amends for the mistakes of men.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 85</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;I looked over at Sherry to whom the military had delivered a semi-comatose child and now sent a deeply damaged emissary to blame “civilians” for the fact that even after six years of intensive family and professional care he didn’t seem to “fit in.” Sherry was gazing at her son, as if to gauge his response, and smiling with gratitude that the eminent colonel had come all this way to address a personal message to the big boy in the big chair who was nothing at all like the boy she had raised.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 92</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Current basic training gives the formula one significant twist: while impressing upon the soldier his inferiority to his military masters, it swells his sense of superiority over others—women, weaker men, “lesser” races, designated enemies, and civilians.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 94</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Shay goes on to assert that “moral injury is an essential part of any combat trauma that leads to lifelong psychological injury. Veterans can usually recover from horror, fear, and grief once they return to civilian life, so long as ‘what’s right’ has not also been violated.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 102</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;2,293 soldiers killed themselves during that decade. Suicides jumped 50 percent between 2001 and 2008 alone, enough after seven years of war to catch the attention of Congress. The volunteer military was already short-handed, so losing personnel at such a pace supposedly posed a threat to national security.</p>
<p>&ldquo;Military leaders called to account told a Congressional hearing that soldiers’ suicides were “triggered” by various “stressors.” Number one was “relationship issues,” a term that in military usage places the blame on wives and girlfriends. It’s code for “bitches” who aren’t “faithful” and “whores” who send Dear John letters by email.</p>
<p>&ldquo;Additional stressors the military leaders cited were: work-related problems, financial pressure, legal concerns, alcoholism, and substance abuse. Conspicuously absent from the list of triggers of soldier suicide was the experience of war itself and the brutal betrayals of “what’s right” that lie at its heart.&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 102</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;[…] researchers have already found in veterans irreversible respiratory damage attributable to the toxic fallout of trash burns on bases in Iraq and Afghanistan. It’s the result of enormous, long-lasting bonfires of chemicals, metals, body waste, and all those plastic bottles that once contained drinking water imported at vast expense to save our troops from downing the local stuff. All that trash burns with a deadly black smoke.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 106</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Facts pile up: a 2006 study shows that “returning veterans were 75 percent more likely to die in traffic accidents than civilians of comparable age, race and sex. They were 148 percent more likely to be killed on motorcycles.” The studies and statistics go on and on, and so do the deaths.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 107</div></div><p>They&rsquo;re also dangerous for everyone else.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;“What about that band of brothers?” I ask him, and he entrusts to me a truth I’ve heard from many troubled soldiers in my travels. He tells me the biggest military secret of all: that the special bonds of soldiers are not what they’re cracked up to be. They are the bonds of men united in common tasks that can suddenly swerve from boring to terrifying and back again.</p>
<p>&ldquo;Such circumstances demand a “manly” demeanor that discourages “feeling things” for others who might get blown sky high at any moment. A soldier—man or woman—has to wear that mask of manliness because to break down in front of your buddies is to acknowledge the deep shit all of you are in and so jeopardize their safety and your own.&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 109</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;In a combat zone soldiers are always fearful, though “alert” is the term they use, and always aware that survival depends on the guys in the unit. They may not even like each other, let alone talk to each other, but a battle buddy becomes a kind of magic talisman whose survival seems to guarantee your own.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 109</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;By 2012, some 663,000 veterans of the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan were classed as having partial or complete service-connected disabilities—that’s one of every four of the 2.3 million who served in those wars.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 111</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;[…] of course it turned out—you can see it coming—that the American Pain Foundation, so concerned about veterans’ care, was essentially a front: it got nearly 90 percent of its funding from major pharmaceutical companies, including Purdue Pharma.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 113</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;[…] while the American Pain Foundation assured the public that “the risk of addiction from opioid pain medication is very low.” In fact, the reverse is true. Opioid painkillers proved to be highly addictive, particularly in young people—say, for example, veterans of recent wars. There can be no doubt that the collusion between Big Pharma and the American Pain Foundation resulted in the death of countless veterans.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 113</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;One third of the soldiers in the Army were on prescription medications in 2010, and nearly half of them—76,500—were on opioid painkillers.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 114</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Staff Sergeant Ortega and I talked a little about the long-term costs of America’s wars and the immense expense to the nation of lifelong health care—so much of it inadequate, or just wrong—for thousands of damaged vets.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 116</div></div><p>Free, lifelong health care for the youngest, most costly cases in the military. Nothing for anyone else.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;They know that a clever person just needs to find the right racket to profit endlessly from America’s endless wars. So many do. That, too, has become the new normal.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 116</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;One father is present in the group of 25, and three mothers. The rest are wives. The absence of husbands sends a powerful message: that real soldiers are men, and the job of reintegrating them falls almost exclusively to mothers, wives, and girlfriends.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 118</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Does he take no interest in the children? It’s that space again. His space is the all-purpose answer as the experts continue to move down the list, until they get to his demands for those “conjugal relations,” in which case the wife is to give him not his space but her body, even in some of the unfamiliar and painful ways he now seems determined to take it.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 120</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;It cares that the wife is always cheerful, always keeping up her soldier’s morale, always giving him his space. It cares that she is always busy—teaching volunteer classes to newcomers on the basics of military life, teaching other wives to improve their attitudes, doing volunteer work for the Family Readiness Group on base almost as if she were getting paid for all her anxious labor, and always encouraging her soldier to reenlist.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 122</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;[…] within the military, a bad attitude toward girls and women usually goes unremarked upon because it is the attitude of the military itself.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 124</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The national media occasionally try to connect the dots, the military never. Only after the ninth homicide at Fort Carson, did the Army start a local inquiry. The general in charge said they were “looking for a trend” among the homicidal soldiers. “Something that happened through their life cycle that might have contributed to this.” An Army prosecutor asked, “Where is this aggression coming from?”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 127</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Sexual assault has become such a feature of daily life in the military that it earned an acronym of its own: MST, for Military Sexual Trauma. But like so many military terms, MST is a self-serving obfuscation. It uses the medical and psychological term “trauma,” which describes an effect of rape, to mask rape itself, which is clearly a crime. At the same time, by labeling criminal sexual assault “military,” it removes it from the realm of criminal prosecution to the shelter of the old boys’ network, the military chain of command.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 128</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;This is an old problem precisely because the military has condoned it, whether the victims were women or men. One notorious serial rapist of men, Jeffrey Dahmer, who joined the Army in 1979, made a habit of beating and raping his 17-year-old room mate and at least one other soldier, as well. Honorably discharged, he went on in civilian life to rape, murder, and dismember at least 16 boys in Milwaukee. He had raped and murdered one boy before he enlisted, but in the military he didn’t have to murder his victims or refrain from raping them because nobody in the chain of command paid the slightest attention to their stories.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 129</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;There’s the metaphor: the soldier with his perfectly silent uncomplaining woman beside him, giving him his space while he enjoyed the national game. He turned off the heat in the apartment in hopes of preserving his woman and making this idyll last. But there was the baby. After a week, the baby was “not looking good,” so Coleman smothered him, wrapped him in a sheet, packed him in a box, and placed it in the freezer. Some days later he put what was left of Jessica Hine in a suitcase and dumped it in the woods. Someone came across it and called the police, and then to the embarrassment of the innocent commanders at MacDill Air Force Base, the story began to come to light.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 136</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;What provoked their greatest fury, however, was encountering Americans who rebuffed what they had to say, who willfully remained deaf to the truth they told about the war. Lifton acknowledged that while their rage could be “at times, painful and self-destructive,” it was “often appropriate and valuable.” It was, in effect, a demand that the guilt they endured be shared by the officials and citizens who had sent them to war. Their guilt was moral. Their rage became political.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 145</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;A Marine veteran of Iraq and Afghanistan told me that a VA therapist labeled her with PTSD though she had neither experienced nor complained of a traumatic event. Instead she had spoken of feeling “a kind of moral revulsion from life in the U.S. after seeing how people in the rest of the world live.”</p>
<p>&ldquo;Many returned soldiers have that same feeling, coupled with a smoldering rage at having lost the lives that once, in their innocence, would have contented them—the family trips to Walmart, the Happy Meals at McDonald’s with all the kids. That’s a world they can’t fit into anymore because, as the Marine veteran said, “We’ve seen the price the world pays for ‘The American Way of Life.’”&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 148</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;But rape, like battering, is about power, about exercising overwhelming control over the body and mind of another person against their will. The military is a man’s world, where women are needed in the absence of sufficient male volunteers, but not particularly welcome. The military inculcates a sense of male superiority over that despised creature, the girl. No soldier (male or female) must ever behave like a girl. Rape demonstrates that a male soldier can act like a real man and a warrior.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 151</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The soldier traumatized by seeing his friends blown to bits feels the horror of it and is helpless to save them. He may feel abandoned, yet guilty that he somehow survived. Rage, sorrow, grief, despair—he may feel them all, but he will know that this terrible act was done by the enemy. On the other hand, soldiers who have been raped—an estimated one in three women in the U.S. military, and tens of thousands of men, as well—go through it all: the horror, helplessness, fear, grief, and despair with the certain knowledge that this thing was done to them by comrades on purpose.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 153</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Most of them come from small towns in the South or the rustbelt of the Midwest or big city ghettoes. Many are following a family heritage of military service that has made veterans of past wars a relatively privileged class, enjoying special access to higher education, jobs, and a nationwide system of socialized medicine.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 159</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Tens of thousands of workers, recruited often with false promises of high wages in posh places like Dubai, paid high fees to recruiters only to find themselves in Iraq or Afghanistan, confined within bases, often stripped of their passports, with no recourse but to work for next to nothing.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 162</div></div><p>This is why no-one really cares about Qatar&rsquo;s hiring practices: because, at the very least, the U.S. military uses the exact same hiring practices to staff its bases with cheap, foreign labor. It&rsquo;s almost certainly not alone in doing so. I imagine larger petrochemical companies are staffed in a similar manner.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;A soldier can do a tour of duty with the Army or Marines and then, having been trained at taxpayer expense, ascend to the happy land where the same government will pay him many times his old salary for much easier work. And, hey, nobody needs to know his business.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 164</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The percentages shift as deployments change, making for slippery and often deceptive statistics. For example, the report noted that only 45,000 American troops were then left in Iraq, but it somehow neglected to mention that a shadow army of 64,250 private contractors still remained.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 164</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;If you stop to think about it, these armies of men used to being accountable to no one, vulnerable to the pitch of any wacko extremist group, returning to an American homeland already armed and fearful—well, that could keep you up at night.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 167</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;There may be a rare American, inside or outside military service, who can state with certainty what we now fight for, but when soldiers fight only because soldiers before them have fought, when soldiers die only because soldiers before them have died, then war truly becomes an endless loop.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 168</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;[…] a familiar war narrative of selfless sacrifice that will be trumpeted in presidential rhetoric, Sunday sermons, and press releases from the Pentagon. Thanks to Hollywood we even know what war is supposed to look like, and how proud and patriotic it is supposed to make us feel.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 168</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;[…] those kids who drank the recruiters’ Kool-Aid and died, and those who still bravely soldier on with their brand-new titanium legs and blasted genitals and decommissioned brains.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 169</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;At Walter Reed Army Medical Center, in 2011, I met a woman from a small town in West Virginia, the mother of a 19-year-old soldier whose legs and genitals were blasted to pulp in Afghanistan. She quit her job and moved to a motel near the hospital, then in Washington D.C., to care for him, while her husband worked a second job at home to make up for part of her lost wages. She had been at the hospital for six months. She hoped to bring her son home someday—perhaps in another year or so—and she expected to take care of him for the rest of his life, or hers. She said, “People expect me to be happy that he survived, and I believe I am, but I can’t really remember what happy feels like.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 169</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;“According to the DOJ [Department of Justice], more than 50 million Americans—twenty-nine percent of the adult population—have an arrest record. This number has doubled since a decade ago, meaning that young people and especially young men, the most likely to commit crimes and the most eagerly sought military recruits, have increasingly problematic criminal histories….&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 171</div></div>      </div>
      </div>
        <div class="footer">
    <div class="footer-data"><div class="footer-links"><ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/contact.php" title="">Contact</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/support.php" title="">Support</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/privacy.php" title="">Privacy</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/rights.php" title="">Rights</a></li></ul></div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="copyright">Copyright (c) 1999-2026 earthli.com. All Rights Reserved.</div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="versions">Powered by <ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore/app_news.php">earthli News 3.7</a></li><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore" title="">earthli WebCore&trade; 3.7</a></li></ul></div></div>    </div>
      </div>
  </div>  </body>
</html>
]]>
  </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
      <title type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[Scoop by Evelyn Waugh (1938) (read in 2022)]]>
  </title>
    <id>https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=4531</id>
    <link href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=4531"/>
    <updated>2023-01-28T16:42:21+01:00</updated>
    <author>
        <name type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[Marco von Ballmoos]]>
  </name>
      <uri>https://earthli.com/users/marco</uri>
    </author>
      <summary type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<p><small class="notes">Standard disclaimer [1]</small></p>
<p><a href="https://www.earthli.com/data/news/attachments/entry/4531/scoop_evelyn_waugh_book.jpeg"><img src="https://www.earthli.com/data/news/attachments/entry/4531/scoop_evelyn_waugh_book_tn.jpeg" alt=" " class=" align-left"></a>This is the story of the press in Great Britain in the 1930s. It paints a decidedly unflattering picture of the entire industry, one that, however hard we would try to claim to the contrary, fits extremely well in describing the media and journalistic culture in this, nearly... [<a class="complete-text-link" href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=4531">More</a>]</p>
]]>
  </summary>
      <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<html lang="en">
  <head>
    <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/themes/ice.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/fonts/raleway.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/core/medium.css">
  </head>
  <body>
<div class="style-controls">  <div class="page">
    <div class="page-body">
<div class="info-box-top">
<p>
Published by <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_user.php?name=marco" title="Marco von Ballmoos" class="visible">marco</a> on <span class="date-time">28. Jan 2023 16:42:21 (GMT-5)</span>
</p>
<p>
Updated by <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_user.php?name=marco" title="Marco von Ballmoos" class="visible">marco</a> on <span class="date-time">28. Jan 2023 18:57:48 (GMT-5)</span>
</p>
</div>
      <div class="text-flow wide">
  <p><small class="notes">Standard disclaimer [1]</small></p>
<p><a href="https://www.earthli.com/data/news/attachments/entry/4531/scoop_evelyn_waugh_book.jpeg"><img src="https://www.earthli.com/data/news/attachments/entry/4531/scoop_evelyn_waugh_book_tn.jpeg" alt=" " class=" align-left"></a>This is the story of the press in Great Britain in the 1930s. It paints a decidedly unflattering picture of the entire industry, one that, however hard we would try to claim to the contrary, fits extremely well in describing the media and journalistic culture in this, nearly the end of the first quarter of the 21st century. It is beautifully written, biting satire.</p>
<p>Suffice it to say that absolutely no-one is in any way interested in what actually happened or what the truth of a particular situation or event might be. Lord Copper runs a large newspaper. He is friends with socialite Mrs. Stitch, who is beautiful and a force of chaos in London. She is friends with John Courtenay Boot, a handsome young man with pretensions of becoming a writer or a journalist or someone famous for writing, at any rate.</p>
<p>He represents that part of the press—which has since because a nearly exclusive majority—that comes from an elite background and finds that telling others what to think seems like a pretty good way to earn a living. To be fair, Boot seems like a reasonably nice guy, but it&rsquo;s unavoidable that he feels entitled, due to his privileged background, to employment in something associated with letters and leisure.</p>
<p>Lord Copper, however, mixes up John Boot—someone who&rsquo;s never worked as a journalist—with William Boot, someone who publishes a bucolic bi-weekly column in his newspaper.</p>
<p>William lives in what is called <span class="quote-inline">&ldquo;genteel&rdquo;</span> poverty. The entire family lives in a manor on lands that they own, but the majority of the wealth resides with a nearly insane—and nearly immortal—dowager-heiress who manipulates the rest of the family with tempting tales of impending inheritance. No-one in the household works in anything approaching a societally useful capacity and they think nothing of it. They are, in the most basic sense of the word, entitled. Because they have a title, they do not need to provide additional value.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;'I aches,&lsquo; said Mrs Jackson with simple dignity. &lsquo;I aches terrible all round the sit-upon. It&rsquo;s the damp.&lsquo;&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 83</div></div><p>Lord Copper sends William Boot to Ishmaelia, a fictional country in Northeastern Africa, to report on the impending revolution there, provoked by those dirty Bolsheviks and Marxists who&rsquo;d been riled up by those dastardly Russians. Every other country is there as well, but they, of course, are on the side of good.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;But of course it&rsquo;s really a war between Russia and Germany and Italy and Japan who are all against one another on the patriotic side.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 38</div></div><p>Plus ça change. We are really a tedious and unimaginative species.</p>
<p>Boot had only rarely left his manor&rsquo;s grounds, to say nothing of having left the country. He finds the train journey from the north country to London nearly insurmountable. He is woefully unprepared for his assignment.</p>
<p>Boot stumbles—in the manner of an Inspector Clouseau or whatever character Leslie Nielsen played in the <em>Naked Gun</em> films—from one hopeless naive and ignorant misstep to another into actually ending up getting a scoop on the war there. This is an achievement because there actually isn&rsquo;t a war going on, but the surfeit of journalists who are being paid to be there see it as their duty to imagine one, and to stiffen the spines of a British populace that might otherwise be less willing to part with its hard-earned taxes on military support for a country that wouldn&rsquo;t, in reality, need it.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;You&rsquo;ll be surprised to find how far the war correspondents keep from the fighting. Why Hitchcock reported the whole Abyssinia campaign from Asmara and gave us some of the most colourful, eyewitness stuff we ever printed.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 28</div></div><p>After having spent some time with other journalists—all of whom are hilariously and scathingly described as utterly amoral scoundrels, interested only in drinking and easy money—William ends up being the only journalist who doesn&rsquo;t travel to a location that is utterly uninteresting journalistically and happens to be around to learn something that he can unknowingly report as true (even though that ends up not being what was reported as well).</p>
<p>William returns to London with his scoop, but the credit ends up going to John, who had never been to Ishmaelia nor had he ever filed a newspaper article. William is nonetheless relieved because now he can return to his idle and societally useless, but thoroughly entitled life in the countryside, away from stress and away from any events that may impact the rigid structure of the quotidian for him.</p>
<p><hr></p>
<div class="footnote-reference"><span id="footnote_DRAFTABLE_ENTRY_4531_1_body" class="footnote-number">[1]</span> Disclaimer: these are notes I took while reading this book. They include citations I found interesting or enlightening or particularly well-written. In some cases, I&rsquo;ve pointed out which of these applies to which citation; in others, I have not. Any benefit you gain from reading these notes is purely incidental to the purpose they serve of reminding me of what I once read. Please see Wikipedia for a summary if I&rsquo;ve failed to provide one sufficient for your purposes. If my notes serve to trigger an interest in this book, then I&rsquo;m happy for you.</div><h2>Citations</h2><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;You see he&rsquo;s a communist. Most of the staff of The Twopence are–they&rsquo;re University men, you see. Pappenhacker says that every time you are polite to a proletarian you are helping to bolster up the capitalist system. He&rsquo;s very clever of course, but he gets rather unpopular.&lsquo;&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 28</div></div><p>That is lovely.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;&rsquo;You&rsquo;ll be surprised to find how far the war correspondents keep from the fighting. Why Hitchcock reported the whole Abyssinia campaign from Asmara and gave us some of the most colourful, eyewitness stuff we ever printed. In any case your life will be insured by the paper for five thousand pounds.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 28</div></div><p>Again, gorgeous.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;[…] fringed outside with ivy, brushed by the boughs of a giant monkey-puzzle;&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 31</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;'Yes, but it&rsquo;s not quite as easy as that. You see they are all negroes. And the fascists won&rsquo;t be called black because of their racial pride, so they are called White after the White Russians. And the Bolshevists want to be called black because of their racial pride. So when you say black you mean red, and when you mean red you say white and when the party who call themselves blacks say traitors they mean what we call blacks, but what we mean when we say traitors I really couldn&rsquo;t tell you.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 38</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;But of course it&rsquo;s really a war between Russia and Germany and Italy and Japan who are all against one another on the patriotic side.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 38</div></div><p>Plus ça change.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;'Then why do they want to send me?&rsquo;</p>
<p>&ldquo;&lsquo;All the papers are sending specials.&rsquo;</p>
<p>&ldquo;&lsquo;And all the papers have reports from three or four agencies?&rsquo;</p>
<p>&ldquo;&lsquo;Yes.&rsquo;</p>
<p>&ldquo;&lsquo;But if we all send the same thing it seems a waste.&rsquo;</p>
<p>&ldquo;&lsquo;There would soon be a row if we did.&rsquo;</p>
<p>&ldquo;&lsquo;But isn&rsquo;t it very confusing if we all send different news?&rsquo;</p>
<p>&ldquo;&lsquo;It gives them a choice. They all have different policies so of course they have to give different news.&rsquo;&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 58</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;News is what a chap who doesn&rsquo;t care much about anything wants to read. And it&rsquo;s only news until he&rsquo;s read it. After that it&rsquo;s dead. We&rsquo;re paid to supply news. If someone else has sent a story before us, our story isn&rsquo;t news. Of course there&rsquo;s colour. Colour is just a lot of bull&rsquo;s-eyes about nothing. It&rsquo;s easy to write and easy to read but it costs too much in cabling so we have to go slow on that. See?&rsquo;&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 59</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;&lsquo;…syndicated all over America. Gets a thousand dollars a week. When he turns up in a place you can bet your life that as long as he&rsquo;s there it&rsquo;ll be the news centre of the world.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 60</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;&lsquo;Why, once Jakes went out to cover a revolution in one of the Balkan capitals. He overslept in his carriage, woke up at the wrong station, didn&rsquo;t know any different, got out, went straight to a hotel, and cabled off a thousand word story about barricades in the streets, flaming churches, machine guns answering the rattle of his typewriter as he wrote, a dead child, like a broken doll, spreadeagled in the deserted roadway below his window–you know. &lsquo;Well they were pretty surprised at his office, getting a story like that from the wrong country, but they trusted Jakes and splashed it in six national newspapers. That day every special in Europe got orders to rush to the new revolution. They arrived in shoals. Everything seemed quiet enough but it was as much as their jobs were worth to say so, with Jakes filing a thousand words of blood and thunder a day. So they chimed in too. Government stocks dropped, financial panic, state of emergency declared, army mobilized, famine, mutiny and in less than a week there was an honest to God revolution under way, just as Jakes had said. There&rsquo;s the power of the Press for you.</p>
<p>&ldquo;&lsquo;They gave Jakes the Nobel Peace Prize for his harrowing descriptions of the carnage–but that was colour stuff.&rsquo;&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 60</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;[…] the custom had grown up for the receiving officer and the Jackson candidate to visit in turn such parts of the Republic as were open to travel, and entertain the neighbouring chiefs to a six days banquet at their camp, after which the stupefied aborigines recorded their votes in the secret and solemn manner prescribed by the constitution.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 67</div></div><p>This is not dissimilar to elections in the States. The &ldquo;stupefied&rdquo; part especially.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;[…] there was, moreover, a railway to the Red Sea coast, bringing a steady stream of manufactured imports which relieved the Ishmaelites of the need to practise their few clumsy crafts, while the adverse trade balance was rectified by an elastic system of bankruptcy law.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 68</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;'Then what are you sending?&rsquo; asked Corker.</p>
<p>&ldquo;&lsquo;Colour stuff,&rsquo; said Pigge, with great disgust. &lsquo;Preparations in the threatened capital, soldiers of fortune, mystery men, foreign influences, volunteers… there isn&rsquo;t any hard news. The fascist headquarters are up country somewhere in the mountains. No one knows where. They&rsquo;re going to attack when the rain stops in about ten days. You can&rsquo;t get a word out of the government. They won&rsquo;t admit there is a crisis.&lsquo;&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 77</div></div><p>They&rsquo;ve <em>always</em> made shit up.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;'I aches,&lsquo; said Mrs Jackson with simple dignity. &lsquo;I aches terrible all round the sit-upon. It&rsquo;s the damp.&lsquo;&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 83</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The milch-goat looked up from her supper of waste-paper; her perennial optimism quickened within her, and swelled to a great and mature confidence; all day she had shared the exhilaration of the season, her pelt had glowed under the newborn sun; deep in her heart she too had made holiday, had cast off the doubts of winter and exulted among the crimson flowers; all day she had dreamed gloriously; now in the limpid evening she gathered her strength, stood for a moment rigid, quivering from horn to tail; then charged, splendidly, irresistibly, triumphantly; the rope snapped and the welter-weight champion of the Adventist University of Alabama sprawled on his face amid the kitchen garbage.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 137</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Might must find a way. Not &ldquo;Force&rdquo; remember; other nations use &ldquo;force&rdquo;; we Britons alone use &ldquo;Might&rdquo;. Only one thing can set things light–sudden and extreme violence, or better still, the effective threat of it. I am committed to very considerable sums in this little gamble and, alas, our countrymen are painfully tolerant nowadays of the losses of their financial superiors. One sighs for the days of Pam or Dizzy. I possess a little influence in political quarters but it will strain it severely to provoke a war on my account. Some semblance of popular support, such as your paper can give, would be very valuable… But I dislike embarrassing my affairs with international issues.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 154</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;[…] on a hundred lines reporters talked at cross purposes; sub-editors busied themselves with their humdrum task of reducing to blank nonsense the sheaves of misinformation which whistling urchins piled before them;&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 160</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;But you do think it&rsquo;s a good way of training oneself–inventing imaginary news?&rsquo;</p>
<p>&ldquo;&lsquo;None better,&rsquo; said William.&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 169</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;And now he stood under the porch, sweating, blistered, nettle-stung, breathless, parched, dizzy, dead-beat and dishevelled, with his bowler hat in one hand and umbrella in the other, leaning against a stucco pillar waiting for someone to open the door. Nobody came. He pulled again at the bell; there was no responsive spring, no echo in the hall beyond. No sound broke the peace of the evening save, in the elms that stood cumbrously on every side, the crying of the rooks and, not unlike it but nearer at hand, directly it seemed over Mr Salter&rsquo;s head, a strong baritone decanting irregular snatches of sacred music.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 180</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;[…] he remembered it as a treble solo rising to the dim vaults of the school chapel, touching the toughest adolescent hearts; he remembered it imperfectly but with deep emotion.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 180</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;'William&rsquo;s friend,&lsquo; said Mrs Boot gravely, &lsquo;has arrived in a most peculiar condition.&rsquo;</p>
<p>&ldquo;&lsquo;I know. I watched him come up the drive. Reelin&rsquo; all over the shop.&lsquo;&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 183</div></div>      </div>
      </div>
        <div class="footer">
    <div class="footer-data"><div class="footer-links"><ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/contact.php" title="">Contact</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/support.php" title="">Support</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/privacy.php" title="">Privacy</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/rights.php" title="">Rights</a></li></ul></div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="copyright">Copyright (c) 1999-2026 earthli.com. All Rights Reserved.</div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="versions">Powered by <ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore/app_news.php">earthli News 3.7</a></li><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore" title="">earthli WebCore&trade; 3.7</a></li></ul></div></div>    </div>
      </div>
  </div>  </body>
</html>
]]>
  </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
      <title type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[La Crise de l'homme by Albert Camus (1946) (read in 2022)]]>
  </title>
    <id>https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=4530</id>
    <link href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=4530"/>
    <updated>2023-01-26T22:18:56+01:00</updated>
    <author>
        <name type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[Marco von Ballmoos]]>
  </name>
      <uri>https://earthli.com/users/marco</uri>
    </author>
      <summary type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<p><small class="notes">Standard disclaimer [1]</small></p>
<p><a href="https://www.earthli.com/data/news/attachments/entry/4530/la_crise_de_l_homme_-_albert_camus.jpeg"><img src="https://www.earthli.com/data/news/attachments/entry/4530/la_crise_de_l_homme_-_albert_camus_tn.jpeg" alt=" " class=" align-right"></a>This is a short lecture delivered by Albert Camus at Columbia University. He spoke of humanity&rsquo;s moral decline—or more the obvious fact that it was less declining and more failing to rise to any occasion—and how we should continue to strive for peace, despite the... [<a class="complete-text-link" href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=4530">More</a>]</p>
]]>
  </summary>
      <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<html lang="en">
  <head>
    <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/themes/ice.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/fonts/raleway.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/core/medium.css">
  </head>
  <body>
<div class="style-controls">  <div class="page">
    <div class="page-body">
<div class="info-box-top">
<p>
Published by <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_user.php?name=marco" title="Marco von Ballmoos" class="visible">marco</a> on <span class="date-time">26. Jan 2023 22:18:56 (GMT-5)</span>
</p>
</div>
      <div class="text-flow wide">
  <p><small class="notes">Standard disclaimer [1]</small></p>
<p><a href="https://www.earthli.com/data/news/attachments/entry/4530/la_crise_de_l_homme_-_albert_camus.jpeg"><img src="https://www.earthli.com/data/news/attachments/entry/4530/la_crise_de_l_homme_-_albert_camus_tn.jpeg" alt=" " class=" align-right"></a>This is a short lecture delivered by Albert Camus at Columbia University. He spoke of humanity&rsquo;s moral decline—or more the obvious fact that it was less declining and more failing to rise to any occasion—and how we should continue to strive for peace, despite the hopelessness of the endeavor. He takes particular issue with the intrinsic hypocrisy that underlies every society we&rsquo;ve known. [2]</p>
<p>It is our hypocrisy that prevents us from truly moving forward because we are congenitally incapable of accepting our mistakes, so that we cannot learn from them. Instead, we deny them.</p>
<p>On the subject of WWII and Hitler, still very fresh in everyone&rsquo;s mind,</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;[…] nous devons rechercher les causes plus générales qui ont rendu possible ce mal affreux qui s’est mis à ronger le visage de l’Europe.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>instead of being led by any moral purpose, we allow ourselves to live by the rules of a base philosophy, one that inverts a moral logic, where might makes right, where success implies goodness.</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Et puisque nous pensions que rien n’a de sens, il fallait conclure que celui qui a raison, c’est celui qui réussit, et qu’il a raison pendant le temps qu’il réussit.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>And, a little further on, the same thought expressed slightly differently,</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;[…] on justifie tous les actes non pas en ce qu’ils sont bons ou mauvais, mais en ce qu’ils sont efficaces ou non.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>This is the world we had in 1946 and this coarse, base philosophy survives today, unabated, having gained power, having enmeshed itself even more deeply into society&rsquo;s entrails, cooing its message of inevitability. It has a message for those who would dare oppose it,</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;On ne pense pas mal parce qu’on est un meurtrier. On est un meurtrier parce qu’on pense mal.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>This is very much the clarion call of our day, nearly a quarter of the way through this, our twenty-first century. If you can control thought, you can control people. And since there is no moral compunction against controlling thought, society chooses this path, rather than convincing anyone of the superiority of its ideas and principles. It cannot do so because it has none, as discussed above.</p>
<p>But even Camus doesn&rsquo;t end his thoughts on such a dark note. Instead, he expresses his hope,</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;[…] ce monde doit cesser d’être celui de policiers, de soldats et de l’argent pour devenir celui de l’homme et de la femme, du travail fécond et du loisir réfléchi.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p><hr></p>
<div class="footnote-reference"><span id="footnote_DRAFTABLE_ENTRY_4530_1_body" class="footnote-number">[1]</span> Disclaimer: these are notes I took while reading this book. They include citations I found interesting or enlightening or particularly well-written. In some cases, I&rsquo;ve pointed out which of these applies to which citation; in others, I have not. Any benefit you gain from reading these notes is purely incidental to the purpose they serve of reminding me of what I once read. Please see Wikipedia for a summary if I&rsquo;ve failed to provide one sufficient for your purposes. If my notes serve to trigger an interest in this book, then I&rsquo;m happy for you.</div><h2>Citations</h2><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Quant à l’attitude morale de cette génération, elle était encore plus catégorique: le nationalisme lui paraissait une vérité dépassée, la religion un exil, vingt-cinq ans de politique internationale lui avait appris à douter de toutes les puretés, et à penser que personne n’avait jamais tort ou raison. Quant à la morale traditionnelle de notre société, elle nous paraissait ce qu’elle n’a pas cessé d’être, c’est-à-dire une monstrueuse hypocrisie.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 12-16</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Elles me permettent de répondre comme ont répondu tous les hommes dont je parlais: «Oui, il y a une Crise de l’Homme, puisque la mort ou la torture d’un être peut dans notre monde être examinée avec un sentiment d’indifférence ou d’intérêt amical ou d’expérimentation ou de simple passivité.»&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 39-41</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;J’ai toujours pensé qu’une nation était solidaire de ses traîtres comme de ses héros. Mais une civilisation aussi. Et la civilisation occidentale blanche, en particulier, est responsable de ses perversions comme de ses réussites. De ce point de vue, nous sommes tous solidaires de l’hitlérisme et nous devons rechercher les causes plus générales qui ont rendu possible ce mal affreux qui s’est mis à ronger le visage de l’Europe.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 46-49</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;[…] une perversion des valeurs telle qu’un homme ou une force historique n’ont plus été jugés en fonction de leur dignité, mais en fonction de leur réussite.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 50-51</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Bien plus, les plus conscients d’entre eux s’apercevaient qu’ils n’avaient encore dans la pensée aucun principe qui pût leur permettre de s’opposer à la terreur et de désavouer le meurtre.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 59-60</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Et puisque nous pensions que rien n’a de sens, il fallait conclure que celui qui a raison, c’est celui qui réussit, et qu’il a raison pendant le temps qu’il réussit. Et c’est si vrai qu’aujourd’hui encore des tas de gens intelligents et sceptiques vous déclarent que si par hasard Hitler avait gagné cette guerre, l’Histoire lui aurait rendu hommage et aurait consacré l’atroce piédestal sur lequel il s’était juché&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 64-67</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Et nous ne pouvons pas douter en vérité que l’Histoire telle que nous la concevons, aurait consacré M. Hitler et justifié la terreur et le meurtre comme nous le consacrons et les justifions au moment où nous osons penser que rien n’a de sens.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 67-69</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Car s’il est vrai que l’Histoire obéit à une logique souveraine et fatale, s’il est vrai selon cette même philosophie allemande que l’État féodal doit fatalement succéder à l’état anarchique, puis les nations à la féodalité, et les empires aux nations pour aboutir enfin à la Société universelle, alors tout ce qui sert cette marche fatale est bon et les accomplissements de l’Histoire sont les vérités définitives.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 78-81</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;[…] on justifie tous les actes non pas en ce qu’ils sont bons ou mauvais, mais en ce qu’ils sont efficaces ou non.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 82-83</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Car si rien n’est vrai ni faux, si rien n’est bon ni mauvais, et si la seule valeur est l’efficacité, alors la règle doit être de se montrer le plus efficace, c’est-à-dire le plus fort.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 86-87</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Que ce soit à l’intérieur des nations ou dans le monde, la méfiance, le ressentiment, la cupidité, la course à la puissance sont en train de fabriquer un univers sombre et désespéré où chaque homme se trouve obligé de vivre dans le présent, le mot seul d’« avenir » lui figurant toutes les angoisses, livré à des puissances abstraites, décharné et abruti par une vie précipitée, séparé des vérités naturelles, des loisirs sages et du simple bonheur.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 91-94</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;[…] appeler les choses par leur nom et bien nous rendre compte que nous tuons des millions d’hommes chaque fois que nous consentons à penser certaines pensées. On ne pense pas mal parce qu’on est un meurtrier. On est un meurtrier parce qu’on pense mal.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 116-118</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Cette génération pense, en somme, que celui qui espère en la condition humaine est un fou et que celui qui désespère des événements est un lâche.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 153-154</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;C’est parce que le monde est malheureux dans son essence, que nous devons faire quelque chose pour le bonheur, c’est parce qu’il est injuste que nous devrons œuvrer pour la justice ; c’est parce qu’il est absurde enfin que nous devons lui donner ses raisons.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 156-157</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;[…] ce monde doit cesser d’être celui de policiers, de soldats et de l’argent pour devenir celui de l’homme et de la femme, du travail fécond et du loisir réfléchi.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 160-161</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;C’est l’indication que seul l’esprit socratique d’indulgence envers les autres et de rigueur envers soi-même est dangereux pour les civilisations du meurtre.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 163-164</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;C’est l’indication que seul l’esprit socratique d’indulgence envers les autres et de rigueur envers soi-même est dangereux pour les civilisations du meurtre. C’est donc l’indication que seul cet esprit peut régénérer le monde. Tout autre effort, si admirable soit-il, dirigé vers la puissance et la domination, ne peut que mutiler l’homme plus gravement encore.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 163-166</div></div><p><hr></p>
<div class="footnote-reference"><span id="footnote_DRAFTABLE_ENTRY_4530_2_body" class="footnote-number">[2]</span> <p>I&rsquo;ve just read the comic <a href="https://existentialcomics.com/comic/482">Simone Weil Takes Ethics 101</a> by <cite>Corey Mohler</cite> (<cite><a href="http://existentialcomics.com/">Existential Comics</a></cite>), which writes,</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;She pointed out that there were certain similarities between every moral system history. For example, every religious and moral system has always said that if a rich man walks by a poor and starving man, he is obligating to give him money and food. Another interesting one is that every moral system agrees that people in power should be punished for moral digressions more than people without power and responsibility.</p>
<p>&ldquo;[…]</p>
<p>&ldquo;Weirdly, when we look at actual societies, these universally agreed upon moral rules have never been applied. […] Why the disconnect? It&rsquo;s almost enough to make you think society is not organized around moral principles.&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div>      </div>
      </div>
        <div class="footer">
    <div class="footer-data"><div class="footer-links"><ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/contact.php" title="">Contact</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/support.php" title="">Support</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/privacy.php" title="">Privacy</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/rights.php" title="">Rights</a></li></ul></div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="copyright">Copyright (c) 1999-2026 earthli.com. All Rights Reserved.</div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="versions">Powered by <ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore/app_news.php">earthli News 3.7</a></li><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore" title="">earthli WebCore&trade; 3.7</a></li></ul></div></div>    </div>
      </div>
  </div>  </body>
</html>
]]>
  </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
      <title type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[Leviathan Falls by James S.A. Corey (2021) (read in 2022)]]>
  </title>
    <id>https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=4262</id>
    <link href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=4262"/>
    <updated>2023-01-26T21:32:52+01:00</updated>
    <author>
        <name type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[Marco von Ballmoos]]>
  </name>
      <uri>https://earthli.com/users/marco</uri>
    </author>
      <summary type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<p><small class="notes">Standard disclaimer [1]</small></p>
<p><a href="https://www.earthli.com/data/news/attachments/entry/4262/leviathanfalls.jpg"><img src="https://www.earthli.com/data/news/attachments/entry/4262/leviathanfalls_tn.jpg" alt=" " class=" align-right"></a>This is the ninth and final volume of <em>The Expanse</em>. Whereas the first books were set very firmly in hard sci-fi, with plenty of orbital mechanics, the second half of the series got much more into the quasi-religious, quasi-magical nature of truly advanced technology. The... [<a class="complete-text-link" href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=4262">More</a>]</p>
]]>
  </summary>
      <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<html lang="en">
  <head>
    <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/themes/ice.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/fonts/raleway.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/core/medium.css">
  </head>
  <body>
<div class="style-controls">  <div class="page">
    <div class="page-body">
<div class="info-box-top">
<p>
Published by <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_user.php?name=marco" title="Marco von Ballmoos" class="visible">marco</a> on <span class="date-time">26. Jan 2023 21:32:52 (GMT-5)</span>
</p>
</div>
      <div class="text-flow wide">
  <p><small class="notes">Standard disclaimer [1]</small></p>
<p><a href="https://www.earthli.com/data/news/attachments/entry/4262/leviathanfalls.jpg"><img src="https://www.earthli.com/data/news/attachments/entry/4262/leviathanfalls_tn.jpg" alt=" " class=" align-right"></a>This is the ninth and final volume of <em>The Expanse</em>. Whereas the first books were set very firmly in hard sci-fi, with plenty of orbital mechanics, the second half of the series got much more into the quasi-religious, quasi-magical nature of truly advanced technology. The protomolecule technology and its inventors were so advanced that anything we have looks positively Newtonian in comparison. The other-dimensional, multiverse-hopping demons that destroyed <em>them</em> are even more powerful and ineffable. </p>
<p>Duarte is awake again, now in possession of faculties that make him something that could only be called a God. He can move his consciousness between the seams of reality to be anywhere he wants, to appear on any ship, in a frame of reference—nothing is beyond him anymore. This takes a bit of the tension out of things, as you can imagine.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The awareness of molecular vibration was analogous to the physical sensation of heat—it measured the same material reality—but the merely human sense was like a child playing a whistle compared with Duarte’s vast, symphonic new awareness.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 6</div></div><p>Do not get the impression that the books are not good, though! They may have jumped from hard sci-fi to fantasy, but they&rsquo;ve done it elegantly and with quite a flair for the written word. The descriptions of otherworldly and unimaginable things are wonderful, evoking the &ldquo;fill in the blanks with your own imagination&rdquo; writing of the great sci-fi short stories of the 20th century. The descriptions of the unknowable technology and physics of these ancient and advanced and now long-gone alien civilizations provide just enough hooks to hang your own ideas, speculation, and extrapolations on.</p>
<p>I mean, take a gander at this stuff, just from the first 10 pages.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;There was pain—a great deal of pain—and there was fear. But there wasn’t anyone left to feel it, so it faded quickly. There was no consciousness, no pattern, no one to think the thoughts that swelled and dimmed. Something more delicate—more graceful, more sophisticated—would have died. The narrative chain that thought of itself as Winston Duarte was ripped to pieces, but the flesh that housed him wasn’t.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 6</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;With infinite effort and care, he pulled the unbearable vastness and complexity of his awareness in and in and in, compressing himself into what he had been. The blue faded into the color he had known as a man. The sense of the storm raging just on the other side, of the violence and threat, faded. He felt the warm, iron-smelling meat of his hand, holding nothing. He opened his eyes, turned to the comm controls, and opened a connection.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 9</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;His awareness of the ring space was clear now. He could hear the echoes of it in the fabric of reality like he was pressing his ear to a ship’s deck to know the status of its drive. The rage of the enemy was as apparent to him now as if he could hear its voices. The shrieks that tore something that wasn’t air in something that wasn’t time.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 10</div></div><p>Gosh, that&rsquo;s just lovely. I love this. I have notes, of course. It’s almost a little convenient that the hyper-libertarian military leader—instead of having been humbled and killed by his hubris—has instead been rewarded by not only becoming a God, but having his prior subjugation of all humanity be retroactively justified even though the problem only he can now solve was not only caused by his selfish striving, it was completely unknown when he began said striving and, therefore, can hardly be claimed to have been the noble reason for the original subjugation. But I suppose Gods too can fool themselves. Why not? They’re omnipotent. They can do anything.</p>
<p>This tension between outright libertarianism and something much closer to Marxism is evident throughout the series. It makes me wonder whether this is deliberate, on the part of the authors, whether it show a tension between the authors&rsquo; worldview, whether the authors were literally incapable of conceiving human society without the stark left/right siloed thinking evident in 21st-century America, or whether they included it deliberately because they thought it was important to highlight, important to present a metaphor for how humanity might be able to save itself despite itself.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The colony worlds were acting like their safety could exist separate from the well-being of all the other systems and ships. It couldn’t be so hard to see how accepting a little restriction and regulation benefited everyone. But inner-worlds culture didn’t measure it that way. For them, being better meant being better than the person next to you, not both of you sharing the same increase.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 67</div></div><p>The following short passage is almost certainly recalling for us the utter inability of many to express any solidarity during what the are calling the past pandemic. The second passage seems to be pointed at the recent pandemic: it, too, deals with a risk that was too vague, too abstract for the required number of people to do something about it.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;There was only so much explaining to people how cooperation would keep them all from dying she could manage in a single sitting.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 69</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;He looked at the tactical. She was right, of course. Just in the time they’d been at a relative stop so that she could read through the data, ten more ships had passed through gates, burning on one errand or another that someone decided was worth the risk. Or didn’t understand that there was a risk. Or didn’t care.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 81</div></div><p>And for every Naomi that rises above her wet-brained, monkey origins, there are billions who can&rsquo;t. And they can&rsquo;t be ruled, they have to participate. That is, if you want to do it right. Duarte didn&rsquo;t think so, but he was an arrogant asshole who became convinced that only he knew what was good for everybody—which is literally <em>always</em> how those kinds of people&rsquo;s stories end.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;“I’ve been running a guerrilla government with shitty communications, thirteen hundred different isolated systems, and literally billions of people who think whatever they’re looking at is the most important thing there is,” Naomi said. “I know how you feel.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 285</div></div><p>And some of those people aren&rsquo;t at all like Naomi, don&rsquo;t understand where all of the beneficence that they&rsquo;ve always known came from—or what goes into ensuring that it continues.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;She hadn’t been born yet when Laconia became its own nation. She’d never known a universe without the gates. She was like looking at a different species.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 294</div></div><p>Like those for whom Xboxes, cell phones, and the Internet are fixed in the firmament. They have no sense of history or perspective or gratefulness or understanding how it all got here, how it&rsquo;s maintained, with what effort and at what cost.</p>
<p>The ineffable alien vibes lead to pretty strong <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3230">Roadside Picnic</a> vibes,</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;You think you know something, right? Then it turns out you were only used to it. It does something, and it does something, and then after a while, you think that’s what it does. Then it turns out there was this whole other thing, maybe.”</p>
<p>&ldquo;“Using a microwave as a lamp, because it has a light in it,” Jim said.&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 271</div></div><p>And, just like in Roadside Picnic, we are presented with the unavoidable reality that we&rsquo;re not ever going to understand any of the stuff we&rsquo;re finding. We can&rsquo;t be sure we&rsquo;re not just using a microwave as a lamp.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;“This is all too big for people,” Alex said. “The things that built it? Maybe they could handle it, but we’re not designed for this scale. We’re trying to get big enough we can make it work, but we’re breaking our legs just standing up.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 274</div></div><p>Amos, Cara, and Xan&rsquo;s experiences as protomolecule people takes us back to delightful and esoteric descriptions of what it might be like to be part of a galaxy- and reality-spanning hive-mind or communications network or civilizational memory or something else that we can&rsquo;t quite grasp because its purpose is so far beyond us that our minds can only dance around the periphery, gleaning morsels of information and perhaps drawing completely incorrect conclusions from the modestly dimensioned shadows thrown by shapes in dimensions completely beyond our reach. We see shadows on the ground, but have no idea what clouds are.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The dreamer dreams, and her dream carries her and hers flowing backward into a time before minds. Like grandmothers telling the stories their grandmothers told about their grandmothers before them, she falls gently and forever into black oceans the size of everything. The other two are and aren’t and are again, with her and within her like humming to the memory of songs she never quite forgot.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 82</div></div><p>We learn of how the protomolecule civilization grew from oceanic creatures buried under a hard ice crust that protected them and rode above the warm glow from the core that gave them the energy to grow into a deeply interconnected civilization of beings—or more like a single being with disparate corporeal selves—whose neurons were quantum-entangled. This is hilariously fun and bold speculation. And somehow it works.</p>
<p>Or consider this Lovecraftian bit of prose, describing how Duarte fights with the nature of reality, tries to manipulate the machines built by long-dead civilizations, built on logic and laws so far removed from anything that he would ever be capable of understanding, but his hubris allows him to make headway nonetheless.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The next time comes, and the dreamer fits his bleeding hands in the spaces between the spaces, breathes through the holes in number, and builds from abstraction a tool to crack wide the abstract. He sees the mechanism through its own strange eyes, and its depth astonishes and terrifies him. The voice of the machine grows deep and grand and horrifying: God whispering the obscenity that ends worlds. The darkness is the darkness of old, but terror has no face for him, and there needs to be a way, so there will be. A thousand bites, a million needle sticks, a ripping away of all that doesn’t fit.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 400</div></div><p>There is tension between Naomi&rsquo;s resistance and what remains of the Laconian navy and the third force of Duarte and his growing horde of hive-mind converts (one of whom is not quite Tanaka, who resists valiantly; despite being an ass of a person, she&rsquo;s a great character, worthy of some grudging admiration). There are lots of fun discussions where Naomi, Jim, and Amos get to play their characters and it&rsquo;s fantastic.</p>
<p>And I can&rsquo;t really avoid talking about how much I like Amos. I have to elevate Amos to one of my favorite characters ever (maybe Leonard from the <em>Hap &amp; Leonard</em> books comes close). And he was super-well-represented by Wes Chatham in the TV series.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;“The kind of guy, he’d feed you into a wood chipper, but he wouldn’t stiff you for his half of the bar tab,” Amos said. “I’ve known folks like that.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 235</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Amos chuckled. “You can tell yourself that, Sunshine. Don’t make it true.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 190</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;“I can’t see how this all plays out.”</p>
<p>&ldquo;“Sure you do. Everyone dies. That’s always been how it is. Only question now is whether we can find some way to not all go at once.”</p>
<p>&ldquo;“If we do, then civilization dies. Everything humanity has ever done goes away.”</p>
<p>&ldquo;“Well, at least there won’t be anyone who misses it,” Amos said, and sighed. “You’re overthinking this, Cap’n. You got now and you got the second your lights go out. Meantime is the only time there is. All that matters is what we do during it.”&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 237</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;Amos raised a hand, palm out, like he was gentling an animal. “Doc. I get it. You’re a good person, and I like you. I trust you. I see that you’re not getting off on this. That’s why we’re not having the other version of this conversation. But it’s done. I’ve known a lot of people who had reasons that this time was different. That this once, it was okay. Maybe the kid’s bad and you’re really helping them. Or they’re into it, and so there’s no harm. And Sparkles is into this. We both know that, right?”</p>
<p>&ldquo;“We do.”</p>
<p>&ldquo;“So there’s all kinds of stories about making this okay. I’m not here to tell stories. I’m just letting you know.”&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 320</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;“And if we all die because we didn’t push a little harder?”</p>
<p>&ldquo;“That’ll suck,” Amos agreed. “I’m not a philosophy guy. I’m not trying to bust your balls or figure out, you know, everything. But this is pretty simple. I came to see what you and Sparkles were doing. I’ve seen it. It needs to stop, so we’re gonna stop. That’s it. We’re good.”&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 321</div></div><p>Humanity needs Amos. Humanity has always needed Amos. It&rsquo;s wonderful to seem him live by his principles and get away with it. That&rsquo;s why it&rsquo;s called fantasy/science fiction.</p>
<p>And throughout the esoterica, some lovely descriptions of what it&rsquo;s like to use advanced technology to navigate a high-tech ship through space.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;[…] he could turn the display to a probabilistic three-dimensional map that showed all the possible flight paths the Roci could take, the complex decision points where an equation with values like time, vector, delta-v, the elasticity of a human blood vessel, and the ship’s position in space defined the moment when a possible future slipped away. Jim moved between the two views—the curve of the Roci’s intended path and the swooping, lily-shaped cone that was the Derecho’s possible paths. Then over to the intricate web of things that could happen but hadn’t yet, as it narrowed second by second and left a thin thread called history behind it.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 246</div></div><p>There is a lot of philosophy of what it means to be human, and how that differs from what it meant to be one of the protomolecule builders (or the Romans, or the Grandmothers, or whatever).</p>
<p>As Duarte moves forward with his plan to turn all of humanity into a galaxy-spanning hive-mind in order to combat the dark aliens from another universe whose power we&rsquo;re stealing whenever we use the ring gates, various characters have conversations about what it would be like to lose oneself into a hive mind, about how much your physicality contributes to how you think and who you are.</p>
<p>Your body isn&rsquo;t even primarily your own cells—but if the microbiome that lives with you in symbiosis were to be even partially changed, you would be a significantly different person. If you didn&rsquo;t know what &ldquo;left&rdquo; was, you would be a person who only knew about half the world of a &ldquo;normal&rdquo; person. But what does normal mean?</p>
<p>Again, we drift into the age-old discussion of what is reality versus what do we sense as reality and what sort of sensorium do we even have and how much do these sensoria differ from being to being and how much does it matter what sort of interpretive mechanism lies behind those at-time faulty and definitely differently functioning sensors. And we land on Quine&rsquo;s qualia, as usual.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The war would go on. The builders of the ring gates moving from form to form—primitive bioluminescent sea slugs, to angels of light, then to a hive of mostly hairless primates with billions of bodies and only one mind. The dark things inside the gates and outside the universe scratching and ripping and unmaking the sickness that had intruded on its reality. Maybe someday that battle would be won. Maybe it would go on forever. Either way, nothing that Jim knew as human would persist. No more first kisses. No more prayers. No more moments of jealousy or insight or selfishness or love. They would be taken apart and fit back together like the bodies on Eros. Something would be there, but it wouldn’t be them.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 407</div></div><p>And, beneath it all, the basic injustice that we read the story from the perspective of humans who are kind of blind to the fact that the dark things are just defending their universe from our <em>plunder of their energy.</em> Sure, we didn&rsquo;t know that&rsquo;s what we were doing, but wasn&rsquo;t it damned convenient that we were able to use alien technology that just happened to defy the laws of physics, except that they didn&rsquo;t because they were just bleeding all of the energy they needed out of another universe. The creatures that live there were none too happy about their imminent demise or the dimming of their universe.</p>
<p>The culmination of this occasionally quite overtly libertarian series is a very unsubtle resistance against the hive mind (of communism). It doesn&rsquo;t consider for a second whether it might be the only way forward, the only way out of the devil&rsquo;s circle of petty war, the only way to resist the dark gods.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;She tried to imagine what it would be like for a baby born into a world like that, not as an individual but an appendage that had never known itself as anything else.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 459</div></div><p>I agree that this isn&rsquo;t appealing at all. I don&rsquo;t even understand how anyone born into generations after mine find the will to live. I don&rsquo;t care about whether humanity survives, per se. I care about doing a good job of being a good person? Individuality is the spice of life. A hive mind runs counter to that. What does it mean to be me? I’m not even mostly human cells. I’m a locus of myriad quantum effects into which energy is poured to hold off entropy and maintain the illusion of an individual. So who cares what I think? I do.</p>
<p>I wonder if the fragility of the original builders wasn&rsquo;t, in fact, due to their interconnectedness. Perhaps the dark gods are brainwashing Duarte into reconfiguring humanity to make an easier target, rather than, as he supposes, a better weapon against them. As Miller said <span class="quote-inline">&ldquo;[y]ou need to ask yourself whether you think Duarte’s the perp, or first among victims.&rdquo;</span></p>
<p>This book started as hardcore sci-fi and kind of ends as fantasy/magic, proving Clarke&rsquo;s adage while waving its hand and mumbling entanglement a lot.</p>
<p>It&rsquo;s a neat trick, but the conceit in the story now is, that the authors use entanglement and non-locality as a magic wand to make everything happen &ldquo;at once&rdquo;, despite the demands of physics when applied to galactic distances. But Bear&rsquo;s &ldquo;exotic&rdquo; material used to hold open wormhole bridges in <em>Forge of God</em> was no different. We end up bending the universe to our will for a good story. And a good story is predicated on human, social involvement and interaction.</p>
<p>But it&rsquo;s indistinguishable from magic. Call it &ldquo;another universe&rdquo; or &ldquo;dark place&rdquo;, it doesn&rsquo;t matter. The &ldquo;dark gods&rdquo; are &ldquo;demons&rdquo; from &ldquo;hell&rdquo;.</p>
<p>In the end, they decide to stay their grubby selves, to not become a single thing.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;For an instant, there was a release of energy second only to the beginning of the universe. There was no one there to see it.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 501</div></div><p>Creatures created this machine and were killed by the inhabitants of the universe from which it drew its energy. Mankind used the relics and drew their attention. The battle was unwinnable so the only solution was to close the door and drop away from the dangerous technology, like Icarus.</p>
<p><hr></p>
<div class="footnote-reference"><span id="footnote_DRAFTABLE_ENTRY_4262_1_body" class="footnote-number">[1]</span> Disclaimer: these are notes I took while reading this book. They include citations I found interesting or enlightening or particularly well-written. In some cases, I&rsquo;ve pointed out which of these applies to which citation; in others, I have not. Any benefit you gain from reading these notes is purely incidental to the purpose they serve of reminding me of what I once read. Please see Wikipedia for a summary if I&rsquo;ve failed to provide one sufficient for your purposes. If my notes serve to trigger an interest in this book, then I&rsquo;m happy for you.</div><h2>Citations</h2><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The awareness of molecular vibration was analogous to the physical sensation of heat—it measured the same material reality—but the merely human sense was like a child playing a whistle compared with Duarte’s vast, symphonic new awareness.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 6</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;There was pain—a great deal of pain—and there was fear. But there wasn’t anyone left to feel it, so it faded quickly. There was no consciousness, no pattern, no one to think the thoughts that swelled and dimmed. Something more delicate—more graceful, more sophisticated—would have died. The narrative chain that thought of itself as Winston Duarte was ripped to pieces, but the flesh that housed him wasn’t.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 6</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The sword that slew a billion angels had only inconvenienced the primates in their bubbles of metal and air.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 9</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;With infinite effort and care, he pulled the unbearable vastness and complexity of his awareness in and in and in, compressing himself into what he had been. The blue faded into the color he had known as a man. The sense of the storm raging just on the other side, of the violence and threat, faded. He felt the warm, iron-smelling meat of his hand, holding nothing. He opened his eyes, turned to the comm controls, and opened a connection.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 9</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;His awareness of the ring space was clear now. He could hear the echoes of it in the fabric of reality like he was pressing his ear to a ship’s deck to know the status of its drive. The rage of the enemy was as apparent to him now as if he could hear its voices. The shrieks that tore something that wasn’t air in something that wasn’t time.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 10</div></div><p>It&rsquo;s almost a little convenient that the hyper-libertarian military leader has, instead of being humbled and killed by his hubris, has been rewarded by not only becoming a God, but having his prior subjugation of all humanity be retroactively justified even though the problem only he can now solve was not only caused by his selfish striving, it was completely unknown when he began said striving and, therefore, can hardly be claimed to have been the noble reason for the original subjugation. But I suppose Gods too can fool themselves. Why not? They&rsquo;re omnipotent. They can do anything.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;There were two levels that she had to figure out. First was the civilization that had built the protomolecule and the gates, then the forces that destroyed them. On her best days, she’d thought of herself like a medieval monk struggling to understand the saints to better see the face of God. More often, she felt like a termite trying to explain dogs to her fellow Isoptera so that they could all speculate about fusion jazz.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 48</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;It sure as hell seemed like better odds than tracking the missing ship.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 63</div></div><p>Searching under the streetlamp.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;I’m not sure what liberty is if you’re not permitted to decide what chances you’re willing to take.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 67</div></div><p>The authors talking again. Whose chances?</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The colony worlds were acting like their safety could exist separate from the well-being of all the other systems and ships. It couldn’t be so hard to see how accepting a little restriction and regulation benefited everyone. But inner-worlds culture didn’t measure it that way. For them, being better meant being better than the person next to you, not both of you sharing the same increase.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 67</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;There was only so much explaining to people how cooperation would keep them all from dying she could manage in a single sitting.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 69</div></div><p>Hey cool, like lockdowns.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;He looked at the tactical. She was right, of course. Just in the time they’d been at a relative stop so that she could read through the data, ten more ships had passed through gates, burning on one errand or another that someone decided was worth the risk. Or didn’t understand that there was a risk. Or didn’t care.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 81</div></div><p>It&rsquo;s like us all with COVID. The risk is too vague, too abstract.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The dreamer dreams, and her dream carries her and hers flowing backward into a time before minds. Like grandmothers telling the stories their grandmothers told about their grandmothers before them, she falls gently and forever into black oceans the size of everything. The other two are and aren’t and are again, with her and within her like humming to the memory of songs she never quite forgot.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 82</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Once and gone so far away no one was there to think it, the it was like this: Down was the hardness of heat, and up was the hardness of cold, and between those two implacabilities was the universe.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 82</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The idea of a flaw as tiny as a missed base pair translating itself into a slightly different curve on a protein and then into a leaking heart valve or a nonfunctional eye was compelling and creepy in more or less equal degrees.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 84</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The things that are doing this are rattling all the windows looking for the way to make us die, and I don’t know how we guard our physical fucking constants against attack. It’s just a matter of time before they figure out how to trigger vacuum decay or something.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 108</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;“You’re going to be fighting for the fate of humanity. I’m going to be worrying about algebra assignments.”</p>
<p>&ldquo;“Well, maybe you’ll get lucky and we’ll win and the algebra will matter. Then twenty, thirty years down the road, something else will show up to slaughter everyone, and you can take care of that one.”&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 116</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;“Basically, it makes a tiny, transitory ring gate, which releases just a lot of energy for free. And apparently, it’s violating entropy. Which means time.”</p>
<p>&ldquo;“Entropy only runs one direction. Primary school physics requires three hours of barking?”</p>
<p>&ldquo;“He’s saying wherever it’s getting that energy from doesn’t play by our rules.”</p>
<p>&ldquo;“We knew that, though.”</p>
<p>&ldquo;“We suspected it.”</p>
<p>&ldquo;“Do we know it now?”</p>
<p>&ldquo;“We suspect it harder,” Elvi said. “We’re scientists. We only know things until someone shows us we’re wrong.”&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 150</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;An hour had sixty minutes because mathematicians in ancient Babylon had worked in a sexagesimal system. A year was the time it took Earth to make a full transit around Sol, and that mattered even though Teresa had never been to Earth and almost certainly never would. Like the number of minutes in an hour, the width of a centimeter, the volume of a liter, the length of a year was the marker by which humanity told the story of itself.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 153</div></div><p>They&rsquo;re arbitrary, but you have to use something.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;She liked the way he deflected. He didn’t want to go to Laconia, his chief mechanic did. His ship wasn’t broken unless Tanaka was willing to permit it to be. There had always been that thread in the tapestry of Laconian culture: the willingness to assert whatever reality your commanding officer proposed. She wondered what Mugabo’s internal life was like. Did he have a reserve of freedom and perversity hidden inside, the way she did, or was he the same blankness all the way down?&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 164</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Naomi shook her head once. “Everything in me says the offer’s a trap, but if it isn’t, and I turn away? If this isn’t the opening I was looking for, I’m not sure what our goal is with them.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 184</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;“I don’t have to,” Amos said with a deceptive mildness. Jim heard the expectation of violence behind it, even if Teresa didn’t.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 186</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;But Naomi’s gaze had turned inward. Something in Teresa’s words had done the trick. Jim saw her understand even before he knew what she’d understood. Naomi lifted her eyebrows and shook her head, just a millimeter back and forth.</p>
<p>&ldquo;“You know what this is?” she said. “This is him making me responsible for what he does. Teresa’s right. She’s got exactly the frame I’m supposed to use. One person for a multitude. But I’m not looking to kill a multitude. That’s him. If I do what he says, I’ll be saving all the people he would kill to punish me if I didn’t.”</p>
<p>&ldquo;Amos’ laugh was almost the same timbre and cadence as Muskrat’s little bark. When he spoke, he was mimicking the soft, threatening whine of an abusive lover. “Look what you made me do, baby. Why do you have to make me so mad?”&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 187</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;“Carrots don’t matter when he still gets to hold the stick,” Naomi said. “I’m done with sticks. Sticks are disqualifying. If he’d led by pulling the Derecho back from Freehold, it would be a different thing. He didn’t. He chose this, and I don’t trust him.” </p>
<p>&ldquo;Jim smiled at her. “Also, he’s asking us to hand over to him a young girl who doesn’t want to go, so fuck him. We don’t do that.”</p>
<p>&ldquo;“Fuck him,” Amos agreed.&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 188</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Amos chuckled. “You can tell yourself that, Sunshine. Don’t make it true.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 190</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;“Once this is over, and your emotions are calm enough that you can see that this decision was correct, we can discuss whether you want to fracture the underground’s leadership or back my authority.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 190</div></div><p>She&rsquo;s doing the same thing as Trejo. Acting, then blaming the other side if it reacts.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;[…] the builders or the Romans or the space jellyfish—the beings of light—hadn’t known what it was to be alone since they’d learned to glow in that ancient, freezing ocean. They were individuals and they were a unity. A superorganism, connected as intimately as she was with her own limbs and organs.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 196</div></div><p>Neurons quantum-entangled. Hilariously fun speculation.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;I think we may be as hard for them to see and make sense of as they are for us. So part of what we can do is dirty up their data. All our random, uncoordinated transits are what they’re feeling. It’s like hearing rats in your walls and putting out different poisons until the noise stops. The noise stopping is how you know what worked. And since we’re still making transits in and out of that gate? As far as they know, their poison didn’t work.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 199</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;“I think there’s a dysfunctional love triangle in the physics group. They may need a talking-to from the boss.”</p>
<p>&ldquo;“Are you fucking kidding me?” Fayez spread his hands. “Every miracle we’ve pulled off, we’ve done it using primates. Just because we’re capable of mind-blowing wonders doesn’t mean we aren’t still sex-and-murder machines. The organism doesn’t change.”&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 202</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;co-opting fast life to bring what makes it rich, sending out what will or may one day return with presents for the grandmothers who cast them free, and the vast patience of the ones who are too cold and too slow and too wide to ever die, too sudden for time to touch. A bubble blown into the holes in the spectrum and a thousand thousand thousand seeds sent like kisses to the singing poet stars.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 206</div></div><p>This is how they describe the protomolecule probes that the hive-mind civilization sent out to communicate with distant galaxies and destinations.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Jillian’s smile felt like a knife. If she had to die, she was glad she was taking this smarmy fuck down with her. “We have a few minutes still. You can send a message. I would let your superiors know that when Colonel Tanaka opened fire without provocation on Draper Station, she didn’t just kill us. She killed you too. I hope it was worth it.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 227</div></div><p>Now you&rsquo;re making me like Jillian again. 👏</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;“I’ve never known Trejo to lie. I’ve never known Duarte to lie either, and he was the personality that set the tone for all of this. He was grandiose. He was ruthless. He was a genius at a couple of things and under the misapprehension that it meant he was smart about everything. But in his mind, he was doing the right thing.”</p>
<p>&ldquo;“The kind of guy, he’d feed you into a wood chipper, but he wouldn’t stiff you for his half of the bar tab,” Amos said. “I’ve known folks like that.”&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 235</div></div><p>I have to elevate Amos to one of my favorite characters ever. And he was super-well-represented by Wes Chatham in the TV series.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;“I can’t see how this all plays out.”</p>
<p>&ldquo;“Sure you do. Everyone dies. That’s always been how it is. Only question now is whether we can find some way to not all go at once.”</p>
<p>&ldquo;“If we do, then civilization dies. Everything humanity has ever done goes away.”</p>
<p>&ldquo;“Well, at least there won’t be anyone who misses it,” Amos said, and sighed. “You’re overthinking this, Cap’n. You got now and you got the second your lights go out. Meantime is the only time there is. All that matters is what we do during it.”</p>
<p>&ldquo;“I just want to go out knowing that things will be okay without me. That it all keeps going.” </p>
<p>&ldquo;“That you’re not the one who dropped the ball.”</p>
<p>&ldquo;“Yeah.”</p>
<p>&ldquo;“Or maybe,” Amos said, “you’re not that important and it ain’t up to you to fix the universe?” </p>
<p>&ldquo;“You always know how to cheer me up.”&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 237</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;[…] he could turn the display to a probabilistic three-dimensional map that showed all the possible flight paths the Roci could take, the complex decision points where an equation with values like time, vector, delta-v, the elasticity of a human blood vessel, and the ship’s position in space defined the moment when a possible future slipped away. Jim moved between the two views—the curve of the Roci’s intended path and the swooping, lily-shaped cone that was the Derecho’s possible paths. Then over to the intricate web of things that could happen but hadn’t yet, as it narrowed second by second and left a thin thread called history behind it.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 246</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Something more solid and real than they were slid through the jumble of atoms that was the wall. A thread of conscious darkness that had never known light, was the antithesis of it. Kit tried to move the clouds that were his arms around the cloud that had been his son, knowing distantly that it couldn’t matter. He was no more solid than the wall had been.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 253</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;She saw through a thousand sets of eyes, felt a thousand different bodies, knew herself by a thousand different names. Aliana Tanaka screamed.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 255</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;You think you know something, right? Then it turns out you were only used to it. It does something, and it does something, and then after a while, you think that’s what it does. Then it turns out there was this whole other thing, maybe.”</p>
<p>&ldquo;“Using a microwave as a lamp, because it has a light in it,” Jim said.&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 271</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;Jim thought about that. Between working for the Transport Union back in the day and fleeing with the underground, he’d been to more systems than most people ever would, and it was still probably under three dozen. He knew how many more there were, how many he’d never see, how many Naomi was trying to coordinate. Alex was right. It was daunting. Maybe more than daunting.</p>
<p>&ldquo;“And that’s not the worst of it,” Alex said. “By the time you’re done, there’s been a century of change at the place you started from. It won’t be the same. All the places you visit start changing into new ones the second you leave.”&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 273</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;“This is all too big for people,” Alex said. “The things that built it? Maybe they could handle it, but we’re not designed for this scale. We’re trying to get big enough we can make it work, but we’re breaking our legs just standing up.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 274</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;“I’ve been running a guerrilla government with shitty communications, thirteen hundred different isolated systems, and literally billions of people who think whatever they’re looking at is the most important thing there is,” Naomi said. “I know how you feel.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 285</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;She hadn’t been born yet when Laconia became its own nation. She’d never known a universe without the gates. She was like looking at a different species.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 294</div></div><p>Like those for whom Xboxes, cell phones, and the Internet are fixed in the firmament. They have no sense of history or perspective or gratefulness or understanding how it all got here, how it&rsquo;s maintained, or at what cost.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;They are threefold, and the dream shudders like an image projected onto cloth when a wind blows. The grandmothers are dead, their voices are all songs sung by ghosts, and the truths they tell, they would tell to anyone. They cannot listen back, and the dreamer sees the hollow behind the mask. She tries to turn her head, to look behind her, to see the single living man in the land of the dead, and the gesture goes on forever, the essence of turning and turning and turning without the release of having turned […]&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 310</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;We aren’t stronger than they were. But we’re base materials. We are made from clay, and that’s our power. They were fragile, and we are robust. They had a sword but lacked the strength to wield it. I will find the sword and the map they left behind. I’m getting lost here. A sword? They built but were unable to effectively use certain tools that prevent the enemy from intruding into what we mean when we say the universe. But those tools exist, and I believe we can make effective use of them. I think I understood that. In broad strokes, anyway. In order to fully access these tools, we have to become more like them. We have to be one thing instead of billions of different ones. I am learning how to do that as well. Are you . . . saying we need to become a hive mind? Yes. Interconnected, with our thoughts and memories flowing freely between nodes. All our illusions of division washed away. Empire was the closest I could imagine to it. But—the third man gestures at himself almost in apology—I can imagine more now.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 311</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Intestinal microflora have a vast effect on cognition, emotion, metabolism. Most of the cells in your body right now aren’t human. Change out a few species of bacteria in your gut, and you’ll be a fundamentally different person. The builders, as far as we can tell, were free-floating individual organisms that networked themselves into a functional consciousness, kind of the way an octopus can be viciously intelligent without a centralized brain. With the nonlocal effects we’ve seen? Sure, why not rebuild that architecture with advanced primates?”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 317</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;“So you’re saying,” Naomi broke in, “that Duarte, or whatever he’s turned himself into, is at least plausibly preparing to make everyone, everywhere part of a collective consciousness with him at the center so that he can go to war against the things beyond the gates.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 317</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;Amos raised a hand, palm out, like he was gentling an animal. “Doc. I get it. You’re a good person, and I like you. I trust you. I see that you’re not getting off on this. That’s why we’re not having the other version of this conversation. But it’s done. I’ve known a lot of people who had reasons that this time was different. That this once, it was okay. Maybe the kid’s bad and you’re really helping them. Or they’re into it, and so there’s no harm. And Sparkles is into this. We both know that, right?”</p>
<p>&ldquo;“We do.”</p>
<p>&ldquo;“So there’s all kinds of stories about making this okay. I’m not here to tell stories. I’m just letting you know.”&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 320</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;“And if we all die because we didn’t push a little harder?”</p>
<p>&ldquo;“That’ll suck,” Amos agreed. “I’m not a philosophy guy. I’m not trying to bust your balls or figure out, you know, everything. But this is pretty simple. I came to see what you and Sparkles were doing. I’ve seen it. It needs to stop, so we’re gonna stop. That’s it. We’re good.”&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 321</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The thing where he lost the idea of Kit in a stream of consciousness that wasn’t his? This was new. It had only come a few times, but afterward he felt thinner and less connected to reality. Like the essential self he’d always known—the thing he meant when he said “I”—turned out to be less an object and more a kind of habit. Not even a persistent habit like taking drugs or gambling. The kind of thing you could take or leave. Coffee with breakfast instead of tea. Buying the same kinds of socks. Existing as an individual. All things he could do or not do without much changing.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 335</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;“Just what was in the toolbox before,” she said. “I feel like I came to cook a meal and it turns out it’s a poetry competition. Everything I built was to fight against Laconia back when Laconia was simple things, like invulnerable ships and neofascist authoritarians. Now that it’s become a really invasive bad dream, how do you build a resistance to fight that?”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 343</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;Left was a thought he just couldn’t have. Like he was colorblind, but for half his perceptual field.”</p>
<p>&ldquo;Tanaka leaned back in her chair. “Are you all right?”</p>
<p>&ldquo;“I always thought about how strange it would be to have that loss. I never thought about how odd we must have been to him. These weird people with twice as much world that he couldn’t conceive of. And he couldn’t. The thoughts you have depend on the brain you have. Change the brain and you change the kinds of thoughts that are possible to think.”&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 358</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;“It would have worked,” she said. “If we’d cooperated, it would have worked.”</p>
<p>&ldquo;“It would have been better.”</p>
<p>&ldquo;“I think about all the things we could have done, all the miracles we could have achieved, if we were all just a little bit better than it turns out we are.”&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 369</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;“Not to protect the empire,” Nagata said. “To protect the human race.”</p>
<p>&ldquo;Tanaka shrugged. “From my perspective, that’s a distinction without a difference.”</p>
<p>&ldquo;“You’re right,” Holden said. “Let’s solve the extinction-level threat first. Then we can all go back to killing each other at a more civilized pace.”</p>
<p>&ldquo;He was staring at her, the bugs around his head motionless, as if each of them was staring too. He’s thinking about how he’s going to have to kill me again when this is all over with, Tanaka realized.&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 383</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The next time comes, and the dreamer fits his bleeding hands in the spaces between the spaces, breathes through the holes in number, and builds from abstraction a tool to crack wide the abstract. He sees the mechanism through its own strange eyes, and its depth astonishes and terrifies him. The voice of the machine grows deep and grand and horrifying: God whispering the obscenity that ends worlds. The darkness is the darkness of old, but terror has no face for him, and there needs to be a way, so there will be. A thousand bites, a million needle sticks, a ripping away of all that doesn’t fit.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 400</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The horned god forgets. The little man forgets. The sparkling ghost cannot bring herself to forgetfulness, and that is and will always be her hunger. The machine glimmers its idiot glimmers, it shapes its insoluble puzzles, it sings a buzzsaw shriek. And in a dream beneath the dream, a man stands alone in a lighthouse and faces an angry sea. His exhaustion and pain rhyme with something real, and Amos opens his eyes.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 401</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;Tanaka either didn’t notice or chose to ignore her. “I’ve taken the liberty of reaching out to Admiral Trejo. I’m hoping we can get some backup here in time.” </p>
<p>&ldquo;“In time for what?” Jim asked.</p>
<p>&ldquo;“The battle,” Tanaka said as if it had been a stupid question.</p>
<p>&ldquo;“Are we sure that these are enemies?” Elvi asked.</p>
<p>&ldquo;“Yes,” Tanaka said. “We tried to get into the station. We were pushed back. Now an ad hoc flotilla of hive-mind-controlled ships are running toward us. If they’re just rushing here to bring us cake and party decorations, we’d know because we’d be in the station chewing the fat with the high consul.”&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 405</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The war would go on. The builders of the ring gates moving from form to form—primitive bioluminescent sea slugs, to angels of light, then to a hive of mostly hairless primates with billions of bodies and only one mind. The dark things inside the gates and outside the universe scratching and ripping and unmaking the sickness that had intruded on its reality. Maybe someday that battle would be won. Maybe it would go on forever. Either way, nothing that Jim knew as human would persist. No more first kisses. No more prayers. No more moments of jealousy or insight or selfishness or love. They would be taken apart and fit back together like the bodies on Eros. Something would be there, but it wouldn’t be them.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 407</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;When they’d been young together, they’d been beautiful just because youth had a beauty all its own. It took age to see whether the beauty could last.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 407</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;She turned off her screen, then squeezed his hand. “You are remarkable. You have always been remarkable. Not always wise, not always thoughtful. But always, always remarkable. Yes, I have paid a price for letting someone as headstrong and impulsive as you matter so very much to me. But I’d do it again.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 408</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Better to play the cards she had. She wasn’t going to win, but she could take a long time losing.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 417</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;“Okay,” Jim said. “We’ve got an entrance. We have a way in.”</p>
<p>&ldquo;“We’ll give you as much time as we can.”</p>
<p>&ldquo;“It’s going to be okay.” The oceanic optimism would have been a lie in anyone else. Or maybe a prayer.</p>
<p>&ldquo;“Good hunting, love,” she said, and the three dots passed into the blue and vanished.&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 420</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;“I feel fine,” Jim said, then paused, considered.</p>
<p>&ldquo;“A little feverish, maybe? But not bad.”</p>
<p>&ldquo;“I want an update every five minutes. Set a timer.”</p>
<p>&ldquo;“If I start feeling worse, I’ll let you know.”</p>
<p>&ldquo;“Yes, you will. Because you’ll be on a timer.”</p>
<p>&ldquo;Miller, floating between them and a half pace back, tried to conceal a grin. Jim weighed the pros and cons of pushing back against Tanaka and set a timer. He set it for seven minutes, though.&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 426</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;“You make it sound like there’s a later in the game.” Miller’s smile was enigmatic, and it looked a little like sorrow by the time it reached his eyes. “Until death all is life.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 428</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;It’s all right to let go, a voice said with the complexity and depth of a choir. If angels had voices, they’d have sounded like this. It’s all right to let go. Holding on is only pain and weariness. Let us carry you, and you can rest. You can let go now. It was almost persuasive. It was almost enough.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 436</div></div><p>The culmination of this occasionally quite overtly libertarian series is a very unsubtle resistance against the hive mind (of communism). It doesn&rsquo;t consider for a second whether it might be the only way forward, the only way out of the vicious cycle of petty war, the only way to resist the dark gods. I agree that it&rsquo;s not, but I also don&rsquo;t care about humanity per se. Individuality is the spice of life. Whatever comes after that doesn&rsquo;t, by definition, interest me.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;“Easier to take something out when you don’t give a shit about what comes after,” Amos agreed.</p>
<p>&ldquo;“Those ships are finished, but I don’t think anyone on ’em cares.” It’s all right to let go. Put down your weapons now, and you will be saving humanity, not destroying it. Don’t be afraid of the changes that are coming, they are the only thing that can save us all. Alex gritted his teeth until his jaw ached.&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 439</div></div><p>Also, the Borg. This book started as hardcore sci-fi and kind of ends as fantasy/magic, proving Clarke&rsquo;s adage while waving its hand and mumbling entanglement a lot.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Miller hoisted a weary eyebrow. “You need to ask yourself whether you think Duarte’s the perp, or first among victims. You know that this stuff can hook itself into your dopamine receptors. Train you up to like whatever it wants you to like. Maybe it grabbed on to how he feels about the kid over there and used that as a leash. The things that built all this shit could be using him from beyond their graves the same as they used Julie. And there are some things you can only access by being in the substrate. You remember that.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 443</div></div><p>I absolutely love Miller, too.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Miller gestured at the walls, the fireflies, the incomprehensible complexity and strangeness of the station. “It’s where the power comes from. They cracked the universe open, pushed their way in here, and it pushed back. A whole other universe trying to smash this place flat, and it powers the gates, the artifacts. That magnetic ray gun Duarte was playing with. They built stars with it. Broke rules that you can’t break without a different set of physics to strain it through. You can Eve-and-apple it all you want, but this shit right here? This is all made out of original sin.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 448</div></div><p>Again, magic. Call it &ldquo;another universe&rdquo; or &ldquo;dark place&rdquo;, it doesn&rsquo;t matter. The &ldquo;dark gods&rdquo; are &ldquo;demons&rdquo; from &ldquo;hell&rdquo;.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;“Teresa, put your helmet back on.” Or else what? Teresa thought. She was so tired of being bullied by the people who said they were there to help her. She was so tired of being Laconian. She pretended she couldn’t make out Tanaka’s words, even though they all knew that wasn’t true. Tanaka’s anger was less than her own. When Tanaka opened up her own visor, Teresa felt a little thrill of victory.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 454</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;“This is why it will work. The meat, the matter, the rude clay of us. It’s hard to kill. The ones who came before were brilliant, but they were fragile. Genius made of tissue paper, and the chaos blew them apart. We can be the best of both now.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 456</div></div><p>I wonder if their fragility wasn&rsquo;t, in fact, due to their interconnectedness. Perhaps the dark gods are brainwashing Duarte into reconfiguring humanity to make an easier target, rather than, as he supposes, a better weapon against them.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The closer the Rocinante and the Falcon kept to the station, the more cover the alien structure provided and the less of the field of battle was in her scopes. The Roci was able to build real-time reports by syncing with other ships in her little fleet by tightbeam and making a patchwork map with data from half a dozen different ships. She didn’t like it, though. It left her feeling half blinded.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 459</div></div><p>Neat trick, but the conceit in the story now is, that the author uses entanglement and non-locality as a magic wand to make everything happen &ldquo;at once&rdquo;, despite the demands of physics when applied to galactic distances. But Bear&rsquo;s &ldquo;exotic&rdquo; material used to hold open wormhole bridges in Forge of God was no different. We end bending the universe to our will for a goo story. And a good story is predicated on human, social involvement and interaction.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;When she had a moment to gather herself, she wondered how many people there were still left out there. Had Duarte invaded and co-opted the minds of everyone in all the systems, or was he targeting the ones on their way toward the rings? She imagined whole stations filled with silent bodies working in perfect coordination, the need for verbal communication replaced by the direct influence of brain on brain. A single hand with billions of fingers. If that was what humanity was now, there would never be another conversation, another misunderstanding or joke or shitty pop song. She tried to imagine what it would be like for a baby born into a world like that, not as an individual but an appendage that had never known itself as anything else.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 459</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;She pulled up the scopes in time to see the dropship scattering into bright dust. There had been people on that ship. She wondered if they were dead now, or if their memories and opinions and senses of their own selves were stuck flickering through a billion different brains that weren’t theirs to begin with. Or if they’d been dead before their bodies were destroyed. Maybe those were different ways of saying the same thing.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 461</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The crushing pressure outside the ring space was a furnace, an engine, a source of unimaginable energy. Like a judo master, the ring station took the near-infinite power of an entire universe trying to crush it and pivoted, turning its strength against it. The other, older universe just outside the sphere of rings moved past him, and he could feel the pain he caused it. He could feel its hatred. The wound in its flesh that he was.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 480</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;It would be beautiful. Miller nodded like he was agreeing with something. Which maybe he was. “Nerving yourself up to kiss your big crush for the first time? Or getting pissed off because the apartment one over has a nicer view than yours? Playing with your grandbabies, or drinking beer with the assholes from work because going back to an empty house is too depressing? All the grimy, grubby bullshit that comes with being locked in your own head for a lifetime. That’s the sacrifice. That’s what you give up to get a place among the stars.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 482</div></div><p>Eloquent.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Jim moved his attention back to the station, complex and active as his cells. It all made sense to him now—the passages, the sentinels, the vast machines that broke rich light and opened the holes in the spectrum. That generated the subtle lines. There was so much that they’d never seen or understood. They’d all just bumbled through, using the gates as shortcuts and hoping for the best. A species of beautiful idiots.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 484</div></div><p>Or just idiots.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;[…] evacuate immediately. Assume whatever system you are entering is where you will be from now on. Expect and assume no further contact after your transit, and do not reenter the ring space once you’ve left. This is not a joke. This is not a drill. Message repeats.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 484</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;“We’re ready,” Elvi said.</p>
<p>&ldquo;“That’s an exaggeration,” Fayez said. “We’ve reached an arbitrary level of fuck-it-good-enough. We’re calling that ready.”&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 496</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;“I mean, don’t get me wrong. My analysis of the situation is a lot like yours. But you got to see there’s an irony in it. All the shit you gave me about giving people all the information and trusting them to do the right thing? Most of these fuckers aren’t gonna know what happened. This decision you’re making for the whole human race.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 500</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;“I absolutely believe that people are more good on balance than bad,” he said. “All the wars and all of the cruelty and all of the violence. I’m not looking away from any of that, and I still think there’s something beautiful about being what we are. History is soaked in blood. The future probably will be too. But for every atrocity, there’s a thousand small kindnesses that no one noticed. A hundred people who spent their lives loving and caring for each other. A few moments of real grace. Maybe it’s only a little more good than bad in us, but . . .”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 500</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;For an instant, there was a release of energy second only to the beginning of the universe. There was no one there to see it.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 501</div></div><p>Creatures created this machine and were killed by the inhabitants of the universe from which it drew its energy. Mankind used the relics and drew their attention. The battle was unwinnable so the only solution was to close the door and drop away from the dangerous technology. Icarus.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The ring gate faded. Its recent brightness went first, and then the distortion at its center . . . faded. Where there had been a mystery and a miracle, a gateway to the galaxy, now there were just distant stars framed by a dull loop of metal a thousand kilometers across.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 501</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;“Even if someone does, though. We’ll never know. The alien roads are gone. Now it’s just us.” The ring tumbled on her screen, and she looked past it to the stars. The billions upon billions upon billions of stars, and the tiny fraction that had other people looking back toward her.</p>
<p>&ldquo;“The stars are still there,” she said. “We’ll find our own way back to them.”&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 503</div></div>      </div>
      </div>
        <div class="footer">
    <div class="footer-data"><div class="footer-links"><ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/contact.php" title="">Contact</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/support.php" title="">Support</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/privacy.php" title="">Privacy</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/rights.php" title="">Rights</a></li></ul></div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="copyright">Copyright (c) 1999-2026 earthli.com. All Rights Reserved.</div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="versions">Powered by <ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore/app_news.php">earthli News 3.7</a></li><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore" title="">earthli WebCore&trade; 3.7</a></li></ul></div></div>    </div>
      </div>
  </div>  </body>
</html>
]]>
  </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
      <title type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[Johnny Got His Gun by Dalton Trumbo (1939) (read in 2022)]]>
  </title>
    <id>https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=4505</id>
    <link href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=4505"/>
    <updated>2023-01-24T22:16:54+01:00</updated>
    <author>
        <name type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[Marco von Ballmoos]]>
  </name>
      <uri>https://earthli.com/users/marco</uri>
    </author>
      <summary type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<p><small class="notes">Standard disclaimer [1]</small></p>
<p><a href="https://www.earthli.com/data/news/attachments/entry/4505/johnnygothisgun.jpeg"><img src="https://www.earthli.com/data/news/attachments/entry/4505/johnnygothisgun_tn.jpeg" alt=" " class=" align-right"></a>This is the story of a young man named Joe Bonham who wakes up in darkness and silence. The last thing he remembers is that he was in Europe, serving in the army during WWI. He slowly learns that it is dark and silent because he is deaf and blind. He learns that he can&rsquo;t speak... [<a class="complete-text-link" href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=4505">More</a>]</p>
]]>
  </summary>
      <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<html lang="en">
  <head>
    <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/themes/ice.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/fonts/raleway.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/core/medium.css">
  </head>
  <body>
<div class="style-controls">  <div class="page">
    <div class="page-body">
<div class="info-box-top">
<p>
Published by <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_user.php?name=marco" title="Marco von Ballmoos" class="visible">marco</a> on <span class="date-time">24. Jan 2023 22:16:54 (GMT-5)</span>
</p>
<p>
Updated by <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_user.php?name=marco" title="Marco von Ballmoos" class="visible">marco</a> on <span class="date-time">24. Jan 2023 22:21:38 (GMT-5)</span>
</p>
</div>
      <div class="text-flow wide">
  <p><small class="notes">Standard disclaimer [1]</small></p>
<p><a href="https://www.earthli.com/data/news/attachments/entry/4505/johnnygothisgun.jpeg"><img src="https://www.earthli.com/data/news/attachments/entry/4505/johnnygothisgun_tn.jpeg" alt=" " class=" align-right"></a>This is the story of a young man named Joe Bonham who wakes up in darkness and silence. The last thing he remembers is that he was in Europe, serving in the army during WWI. He slowly learns that it is dark and silent because he is deaf and blind. He learns that he can&rsquo;t speak because he no longer has a mouth to speak of: no tongue, no teeth, just a weird emptiness that he can sense, but not feel. He can&rsquo;t feel because he can&rsquo;t move his arms and legs. He can&rsquo;t move any of his limbs because they&rsquo;re no longer attached to his body.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;He had no legs and no arms and no eyes and no ears and no nose and no mouth and no tongue. What a hell of a dream. It must be a dream. Of course sweet god it’s a dream. He’d have to wake up or he’d go nuts. Nobody could live like that. A person in that condition would be dead and he wasn’t dead so he wasn’t in that condition. Just dreaming.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 64</div></div><p>Joe drifts in and out of long reveries. He goes mad. He has strong visions, revenge fantasies. Time passes too slowly. The wheels spin. Joe can&rsquo;t sleep. He&rsquo;s always rested. He has no idea what time it is. His circadian rhythm is completely broken. He is exhausted and bored and insomniac and trapped in his own body.</p>
<p>He can&rsquo;t commit suicide. He tries holding his breath, but realizes that he is intubated.</p>
<p>He spends a lot of time thinking about his curtailed youth—he&rsquo;s so young, he doesn&rsquo;t even have very much life to reflect back upon. He had one girl who sorta-kinda was into him, maybe. He had one good friend. He reminisces, he builds fantastic castles of fantasy. He fills in the details that led to his recruitment, to his deployment, to his diminution.</p>
<p>He eventually settles on keeping track of time. He counts his nurse&rsquo;s shifts. He can tell which nurse is there by the way they touch him, by the way they tread, by how long they stay. He can&rsquo;t detect anything else. He focuses so hard on keeping track of time, keeping it up for weeks and months.</p>
<p>Eventually, he figures out that he can feel the sun shining on him from a window. He realizes he can use the warmth as a cue to detect the time of day. He no longer has to worry that he&rsquo;ll lose track. It&rsquo;s extremely important to him that he knows the time of day, that he is still a participant in the passing of time.</p>
<p>Eventually, he learns that he can move. He can bounce his head up and down on the pillow. He sends simple morse code when he detects the nurse is there. The nurse things he&rsquo;s freaking out. She sedates him. This happens again and again. He persists. He persists. He persists. Eventually a new nurse who knows morse code is in the room and detects the message. She traces out Merry Christmas on his chest and he morses that he understands! It&rsquo;s like a miracle. Joe is part of the world again, no longer 100% cut off. It&rsquo;s been years.</p>
<p>Joe tells them that he wants to tour the country, serving as a living example to others who would consider joining the military and the war. The military, of course, refuses him his wish. He asks for death. This, too, is refused him. He knows why, of course. They know why he wants to go on tour. And they know he&rsquo;s right.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;He was the future he was a perfect picture of the future and they were afraid to let anyone see what the future was like. Already they were looking ahead they were figuring the future and somewhere in the future they saw war. To fight that war they would need men and if men saw the future they wouldn’t fight.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 249</div></div><p>This book is strongly and stridently anti-war and anti-capitalist, its message unmistakeable and, unfortunately, timeless.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;And if they put guns in our hands and point us to kill other human beings, no one will have to tell us who the enemy is this time, because we will know, we will certainly know. The enemy is the government in all its greed and corruption, in all its scheming and manipulations, in its endless desire for profit at the expense of human lives. Try it again, and we will fight you with everything within us, and we will not rest until there is an end to war for all time, and all of us together can begin to truly live.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 228-231</div></div><p>It is anti-corporatism, it is anti-capitalism, it is pro-life—no, not like that, like, for real pro-life, as in every life is worth saving and no lives are worth wasting, so do everything you can to avoid conflict, especially armed conflict, instead of driving at with lusty glee and dollar signs in your eyes like you always do—it is absolutely pro-peace and anti-war and that is worth repeating because that&rsquo;s the entire reason Trumbo wrote the book.</p>
<p>The book takes issue with those who are willing to encourage others to die for an ideal, for a dream of a better world. Would that it were true! That soldiers really are fighting for those ideals that drive them into the battlefield. Would that those fancy words and lofty ideals were worth a tinker&rsquo;s damn. </p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Maybe that’s a bad way to think. There are lots of idealists around who will say have we got so low that nothing is more precious than life? Surely there are ideals worth fighting for even dying for. If not then we are worse than the beasts of the field and have sunk into barbarity. Then you say that’s all right let’s be barbarous just so long as we don’t have war. You keep your ideals just as long as they don’t cost me my life.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 118</div></div><p>The point that Joe makes is that no-one really knows what death is. All claims to the contrary are bullshit. No one <em>knows</em>.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Nobody but the dead know whether all these things people talk about are worth dying for or not. And the dead can’t talk. So the words about noble deaths and sacred blood and honor and such are all put into dead lips by grave robbers and fakes who have no right to speak for the dead. If a man says death before dishonor he is either a fool or a liar because he doesn’t know what death is. He isn’t able to judge. He only knows about living. He doesn’t know anything about dying.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 119</div></div><p><span style="width: 200px; display: table" class=" align-right"><span class="auto-content-inline"><a href="https://www.earthli.com/data/news/attachments/entry/4505/corporateprofits.jpeg"><img src="https://www.earthli.com/data/news/attachments/entry/4505/corporateprofits_tn.jpeg" alt=" " style="width: 200px"></a></span><span class="auto-content-caption"><a href="https://www.earthli.com/data/news/attachments/entry/4505/corporateprofits.jpeg">You mean it&#039;s all about corporate profits? Always has been.</a></span></span>And there&rsquo;s all of that nasty stuff in between like, for example, the very-close-to-death-but-not-quite-dead-in-fact-not-allowed-to-die state that Joe finds himself in. What kind of trade-off is that? Was his sacrifice worth it? His entombment in his own body? What is this mysterious &ldquo;it&rdquo; for which he sacrificed? It&rsquo;s those corporate profits, of course. It always has been.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Maybe times are bad and your salaries are low. Don’t worry boys because there is always a way to cure things like that. Have a war and then prices go up and wages go up and everybody makes a hell of a lot of money. There’ll be one along pretty soon boys so don’t get impatient. It’ll come and then you’ll have your chance.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 235</div></div><p><hr></p>
<div class="footnote-reference"><span id="footnote_DRAFTABLE_ENTRY_4505_1_body" class="footnote-number">[1]</span> Disclaimer: these are notes I took while reading this book. They include citations I found interesting or enlightening or particularly well-written. In some cases, I&rsquo;ve pointed out which of these applies to which citation; in others, I have not. Any benefit you gain from reading these notes is purely incidental to the purpose they serve of reminding me of what I once read. Please see Wikipedia for a summary if I&rsquo;ve failed to provide one sufficient for your purposes. If my notes serve to trigger an interest in this book, then I&rsquo;m happy for you.</div><h2>Citations</h2><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;And if they put guns in our hands and point us to kill other human beings, no one will have to tell us who the enemy is this time, because we will know, we will certainly know. The enemy is the government in all its greed and corruption, in all its scheming and manipulations, in its endless desire for profit at the expense of human lives. Try it again, and we will fight you with everything within us, and we will not rest until there is an end to war for all time, and all of us together can begin to truly live.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 228-231</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The book has a weird political history. Written in 1938 when pacifism was anathema to the American left and most of the center, it went to the printers in the spring of 1939 and was published on September third—ten days after the Nazi–Soviet pact, two days after the start of World War II.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 243-245</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;As the conflict deepened, and Johnny went out of print altogether, its unavailability became a civil liberties issue with the extreme American right. Peace organizations and “Mothers’” groups from all over the country showered me with fiercely sympathetic letters denouncing Jews, Communists, New Dealers and international bankers, who had suppressed my novel to intimidate millions of true Americans who demanded an immediate negotiated peace.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 256-259</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;ADDENDUM: 1970 Eleven years later. Numbers have dehumanized us. Over breakfast coffee we read of 40,000 American dead in Vietnam. Instead of vomiting, we reach for the toast. Our morning rush through crowded streets is not to cry murder but to hit that trough before somebody else gobbles our share.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 277-279</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Things weren’t going well and they never would have gone well for you and it’s just as good you’re dead. People’ve got to be quicker and harder these days than you were dad. Goodnight and good-dreams. I won’t forget you and I’m not as sorry for you today as I was yesterday. I loved you dad goodnight.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 7</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;His mother would go back to the piano and play After the Ball is Over and Clem somewhere would be listening to music for maybe the first time in three or four months. Farmers’ wives would be sitting with their work done and receivers to their ears listening too and getting dreamy and thinking about things their husbands wouldn’t suspect […]&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 14</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;But even better than the bread were the rolls. She baked them to come out of the oven just before supper. They were steaming hot and you put butter inside them and it melted and then you put jam on them or apricot preserves with nuts in the syrup. That was all you wanted for supper although you had to eat other things of course. On summer afternoons you took a thick slice of the bread and put cold butter on it. Then you sprinkled sugar over the butter and that was better than cake. Or you got a thick slice of sweet bermuda onion and put it between two slabs of bread and butter and nobody anywhere in the world had anything more delicious to eat.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 17</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;All you wanted to do Joe was to live. You were born and raised in the good healthy country of Colorado and you had no more to do with Germany or England or France or even with Washington D.C. than you had to do with the man in the moon. Yet here you are and it was none of your affair. Here you are Joe and you’re hurt worse than you think. You’re hurt bad.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 25</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Oh Kareen why do they have a war right now just when we find each other? Kareen we’ve got more important things than war. Us Kareen you and me in a house. I’ll come home at night to you in my house your house our house. We’ll have fat happy kids smart kids too. That’s more important than a war.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 38</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;His head throbbed and he could hear his heart pounding against his ribs and even down in the calves of his legs he could feel the strong pulse beat and yet he couldn’t stop work even for a minute. His breath came shorter and shorter and it seemed that his lungs were too small to hold the air he had to get into them if he was going to keep alive. It was a hundred and twenty-five in the shade and there wasn’t any shade and he felt like he was smothering under a white hot blanket and all he could think was I’ve got to stop I’ve got to stop I’ve got to stop.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 42</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;He had no legs and no arms and no eyes and no ears and no nose and no mouth and no tongue. What a hell of a dream. It must be a dream. Of course sweet god it’s a dream. He’d have to wake up or he’d go nuts. Nobody could live like that. A person in that condition would be dead and he wasn’t dead so he wasn’t in that condition. Just dreaming.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 64</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;He couldn’t live like this because he would go crazy. But he couldn’t die because he couldn’t kill himself. If he could only breathe he could die. That was funny but it was true. He could hold his breath and kill himself. That was the only way left. Except that he wasn’t breathing. His lungs were pumping air but he couldn’t stop them from doing it. He couldn’t live and he couldn’t die.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 64</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;He hardly ever got tired. When you got to thinking about it it wasn’t bad. Walking all night long and working hard and getting eighteen dollars at the end of the week for your trouble. Not bad.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 67</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;He was lying in stillness. He was completely helpless. Somewhere sticking in his stomach was a tube they fed him through. That was exactly like the womb except a baby in its mother’s body could look forward to the time when it would live.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 83</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;He would be in this womb forever and ever and ever. He must remember that. He must never expect or hope for anything different. This was his life from now on every day and every hour and every minute of it. He would never again be able to say hello how are you I love you. He would never again be able to hear music or the whisper of the wind through trees or the chuckle of running water. He would never again breathe in the smell of a steak frying in his mother’s kitchen or the dampness of spring in the air or the wonderful fragrance of sagebrush carried on the wind across a wide open plain.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 83</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;He found himself running through the corridors of the hospital. He found himself coming upon a nurse and grabbing her by the throat and putting her head down to the hole in his side where the rat was still clinging and hollering at her you lazy slut why don’t you come and chase the rats off your customers? He was running through the night shrieking. Running through a whole series of nights running through an eternity of nights yelling for Christ sake somebody take this rat off me see him hanging there? Running through a lifetime of nights and shrieking and trying to push the rat off and feeling the rat sink its teeth deeper and deeper.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 96</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Each time he fell asleep the rat would come and sleep instead of being forgetfulness would become as bad as being awake.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 98</div></div><p>JFC, could you spare a comma?</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;That was the way to stop nightmares by yelling so hard you waked yourself up. But hell that wouldn’t work for him now. In the first place he couldn’t yell and in the second place he was so deaf he couldn’t hear the noise anyhow. That was no good. He would have to find some other way.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 98</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Jesus he was in an awful mess. He was in an awful mess if he couldn’t even tell whether he was awake or asleep. But there wasn’t any way to tell he could think of.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 100</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;It was hard to understand how his father could be such a big failure when you stopped to think about the thing. He was a good man and an honest man. He kept his children together and they ate good food fine food rich food better food than people ate in the cities. Even rich people in the cities couldn’t get vegetables as fresh or as crisp. They couldn’t get meat as well cured. No amount of money could buy that. Those things you had to raise for yourself. His father had managed to do it even to the honey they used on the hot biscuits his mother made. His father had managed to produce all these things on two city lots and yet his father was a failure.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 109</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;He was lonely for one look for one smell for one taste for one word that would bring Shale City and his father and his mother and his sisters back to him. But he was so cut off from them that even if they were standing beside his bed they would be as distant as if they were ten thousand miles away.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 111</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Maybe that’s a bad way to think. There are lots of idealists around who will say have we got so low that nothing is more precious than life? Surely there are ideals worth fighting for even dying for. If not then we are worse than the beasts of the field and have sunk into barbarity. Then you say that’s all right let’s be barbarous just so long as we don’t have war. You keep your ideals just as long as they don’t cost me my life.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 118</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Nobody but the dead know whether all these things people talk about are worth dying for or not. And the dead can’t talk. So the words about noble deaths and sacred blood and honor and such are all put into dead lips by grave robbers and fakes who have no right to speak for the dead. If a man says death before dishonor he is either a fool or a liar because he doesn’t know what death is. He isn’t able to judge. He only knows about living. He doesn’t know anything about dying.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 119</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Now if you die to protect your life you aren’t alive anyhow so how is there any sense in a thing like that? A man doesn’t say I will starve myself to death to keep from starving. He doesn’t say I will spend all my money in order to save my money. He doesn’t say I will burn my house down in order to keep it from burning. Why then should he be willing to die for the privilege of living? There ought to be at least as much common sense about living and dying as there is about going to the grocery store and buying a loaf of bread.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 120</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Maybe it’ll work and maybe it won’t. If it does all you have to do is to wait six more trips and see if there is another sunrise and if there is you’ll have the number of trips every twenty-four hours and that will give you a way of setting up a calendar around the nurse’s visits. The important thing is to catch two sunrises in a row and then you have trapped time forever then you can begin to catch up with the world.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 139</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;He had been a very busy guy and he had learned a lot. He had learned how to check everything against something else so that he couldn’t possibly lose the grip he had gained on time. He could tell day from night without straining for the sunrise. He knew exactly what visit from the nurse would bring him a bath and a change of bedclothes. When the schedule was interrupted and the nurse was a visit late he grew disappointed and sullen and tried to imagine what she was doing but when she finally came he was always excited.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 146</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Kareen would never grow old. She was still nineteen. She would be nineteen forever. Her hair would stay brown and her eyes clear and her skin fresh like rain. He would never let one line mark her face. That was something he could do for her that no other man on earth could ever do.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 150</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;A guy liked to think he was home. Even though he could do nothing but lie in blackness it would be better if the blackness were the blackness of home and if the people who moved in the blackness were his own people his own American people.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 151</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Her hands sought out the far parts of his body. They inflamed his nerves with a kind of false passion that fled in little tremors along the surface of his skin. Even while he was thinking oh my god it’s come to this here is the reason she thinks I’m tapping goddam her god bless her what shall I do?—even while he was thinking it he fell in with her rhythm he strained to her touch his heart pounded to a faster tempo and he forgot everything in the world except the motion and the sudden pumping of his blood […]&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 174</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;How the great Carthaginian lords wanting someone to guard their treasure stores would find a healthy young man and put out his eyes with sharp sticks so he wouldn’t be able to see where they took him and thus learn the location of their treasures. Then they would take him poor blinded young guy down into the passages under the level of the streets to the door of the treasure house. There they chained one arm and one leg to the door and one arm and one leg to the wall so that for anyone to enter the seal would have to be broken and the seal was the living breathing body of a man.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 190</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;God help us he thought god help us all the slaves. For hundreds and thousands of years we have been tapping we slaves tapping away from the depths of our prisons. All of us all of the little guys all the slaves from the beginning of time tapping tapping tapping—&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 192</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;He was falling a million times faster than a shooting star falling faster than light travels falling through ten thousand years and ten thousand worlds with things becoming louder and faster and more terrible. Great round globes bigger than the sun bigger than the whole milky way came at him so fast they might have been cards shuffled through a pack. They came at him and hit him full in the face and burst like soap bubbles to make way for the next and the next. His brain was working so fast that he had time to flinch for each one and after it had burst to prepare himself for the shock of the next.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 196</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The nightmare train went on through the sunlight its whistle screeching and the dead men inside laughing. But he was alone in the desert running running till his lungs squeaked running toward Christ who floated there in the heat with purple robes. He ran and he ran and he ran and finally he came up to Christ. He threw himself into the hot sand at the feet of Christ and began to cry.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 201</div></div><p>That is a hell of a morphine trip.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Maybe times are bad and your salaries are low. Don’t worry boys because there is always a way to cure things like that. Have a war and then prices go up and wages go up and everybody makes a hell of a lot of money. There’ll be one along pretty soon boys so don’t get impatient. It’ll come and then you’ll have your chance.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 235</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;And if they draft you why you’ve got a good chance of coming back without so many needs. Maybe you’ll need only one shoe instead of two that’s saving money. Maybe you’ll be blind and if you are why then you never need worry about the expense of glasses. Maybe you’ll be lucky like me. Look at me close boys I don’t need anything. A little broth or something three times a day and that’s all. No shoes no socks no underwear no shirt no gloves no hat no necktie no collar-buttons no vest no coat no movies no vaudeville no football not even a shave.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 236</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Quit crying you silly little girl come over here and look at the nice man the nice man who was a soldier boy. You remember him don’t you? Don’t you remember little crybaby how you waved flags and saved tinfoil and put your savings in thrift stamps? Of course you do you silly. Well here’s the soldier you did it for.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 237</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;New nursery rhymes for new times. Hickory dickory dock my daddy’s nuts from shellshock. Humpty dumpty thought he was wise till gas came along and burned out his eyes. A diller a dollar a ten o’clock scholar blow off his legs and then watch him holler. Rockabye baby in the treetop don’t stop a bomb or you’ll probably flop. Now I lay me down to sleep my bombproof cellar’s good and deep but if I’m killed before I wake remember god it’s for your sake amen.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 237</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Let them talk more munitions and airplanes and battleships and tanks and gases why of course we’ve got to have them we can’t get along without them how in the world could we protect the peace if we didn’t have them? Let them form blocs and alliances and mutual assistance pacts and guarantees of neutrality. Let them draft notes and ultimatums and protests and accusations.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 239</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;He saw a world of dead fathers and crippled brothers and crazy screaming sons. He saw a world of armless mothers clasping headless babies to their breasts trying to scream out their grief from throats that were cancerous with gas. He saw starved cities black and cold and motionless and the only things in this whole dead terrible world that made a move or a sound were the airplanes that blackened the sky and far off against the horizon the thunder of the big guns and the puffs that rose from barren tortured earth when their shells exploded.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 248</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;He was the future he was a perfect picture of the future and they were afraid to let anyone see what the future was like. Already they were looking ahead they were figuring the future and somewhere in the future they saw war. To fight that war they would need men and if men saw the future they wouldn’t fight.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 249</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;In your opinion, given the current state of world affairs, is Johnny Got His Gun still an important book?&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 254</div></div><p>Oh my goodness. It&rsquo;s such a shame that this book seems to be cursed to always be relevant.</p>
      </div>
      </div>
        <div class="footer">
    <div class="footer-data"><div class="footer-links"><ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/contact.php" title="">Contact</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/support.php" title="">Support</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/privacy.php" title="">Privacy</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/rights.php" title="">Rights</a></li></ul></div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="copyright">Copyright (c) 1999-2026 earthli.com. All Rights Reserved.</div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="versions">Powered by <ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore/app_news.php">earthli News 3.7</a></li><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore" title="">earthli WebCore&trade; 3.7</a></li></ul></div></div>    </div>
      </div>
  </div>  </body>
</html>
]]>
  </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
      <title type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[Tiamat's Wrath by James S. A. Corey (2019) (read in 2022)]]>
  </title>
    <id>https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=4439</id>
    <link href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=4439"/>
    <updated>2023-01-23T22:17:09+01:00</updated>
    <author>
        <name type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[Marco von Ballmoos]]>
  </name>
      <uri>https://earthli.com/users/marco</uri>
    </author>
      <summary type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<p><small class="notes">Standard disclaimer [1]</small></p>
<p><a href="https://www.earthli.com/data/news/attachments/entry/4439/tiamats_wrath.jpg"><img src="https://www.earthli.com/data/news/attachments/entry/4439/tiamats_wrath_tn.jpg" alt=" " class=" align-right"></a>This is the eighth book of the <cite>The Expanse</cite> series. It&rsquo;s four years after Laconia came in and took over everything in <cite>Persepolis Rising</cite>. Chrisjen Avasarala has finally died and been interred in the capitol city on Laconia. Holden, who is still being held prisoner there, attends... [<a class="complete-text-link" href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=4439">More</a>]</p>
]]>
  </summary>
      <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<html lang="en">
  <head>
    <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/themes/ice.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/fonts/raleway.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/core/medium.css">
  </head>
  <body>
<div class="style-controls">  <div class="page">
    <div class="page-body">
<div class="info-box-top">
<p>
Published by <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_user.php?name=marco" title="Marco von Ballmoos" class="visible">marco</a> on <span class="date-time">23. Jan 2023 22:17:09 (GMT-5)</span>
</p>
<p>
Updated by <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_user.php?name=marco" title="Marco von Ballmoos" class="visible">marco</a> on <span class="date-time">30. Jan 2023 22:53:36 (GMT-5)</span>
</p>
</div>
      <div class="text-flow wide">
  <p><small class="notes">Standard disclaimer [1]</small></p>
<p><a href="https://www.earthli.com/data/news/attachments/entry/4439/tiamats_wrath.jpg"><img src="https://www.earthli.com/data/news/attachments/entry/4439/tiamats_wrath_tn.jpg" alt=" " class=" align-right"></a>This is the eighth book of the <cite>The Expanse</cite> series. It&rsquo;s four years after Laconia came in and took over everything in <cite>Persepolis Rising</cite>. Chrisjen Avasarala has finally died and been interred in the capitol city on Laconia. Holden, who is still being held prisoner there, attends the funeral. He attends a lot of state functions, keeping his ear to the ground. Duarte tolerates him because of his first-hand knowledge of the civilization that destroyed the protomolecule engineers and that has &ldquo;attacked&rdquo; humanity.</p>
<p>Saba is on <cite>Medina Station</cite>, running the resistance with Naomi, who&rsquo;s living in a shipping container, planning from the center of her spiderweb. Bobbie and Alex are still on the <cite>Gathering Storm</cite>, keeping the ship mostly out of sight in large transports, but occasionally jumping out for a raid. Amos disappeared while on a mission on Laconia. Camina Drummer is still working for the Transport Union, but no longer runs it.</p>
<p>Elvi Okoye and Fayez are officially part of a science mission to investigate empty Ring systems to see if there is anything of interest there. In the third system, they discover a solar-system-sized diamond that appears to be a storage system for the sum-total of the protomolecule civilization&rsquo;s knowledge. They need to crack the code, but it&rsquo;s only a matter of time. They move on to the next system, which is empty of any stray matter whatsoever and contains a neutron star on the brink of becoming a black hole. The pole of the star is lined up with the gate.</p>
<p>Bobbie and Alex lead a mission to capture a political officer and take supplies for the <cite>Storm</cite>. They get the supplies, but the officer is lost, as are several others. Among the supplies are antimatter containers of incredible power, presumably intended to refuel the <cite>Tempest&rsquo;s</cite> magnetic cannon. The <cite>Tempest</cite> moves from Earth orbit, heading out to Jupiter to investigate.</p>
<p>Okoye&rsquo;s ship, the <cite>Falcon</cite>, is not just on a science mission, to her surprise. Sagale, her commanding officer, informs her that they will use the &ldquo;empty&rdquo; system as a testbed to &ldquo;punish&rdquo; the civilization that keeps making ships &ldquo;go Dutchman&rdquo; at the gates. Duarte wants to send an antimatter bomb through on a ship designed to be snatched. They do this, but the reaction is quick: The system starts to fill with loose hydrogen, which would ordinarily not be dangerous. In this system, it&rsquo;s enough matter to tip the balance on the neutron star, turning it into a black hole. A giant gamma flare announces the birth of the black hole—and it&rsquo;s aimed right through the gate.</p>
<p>The <cite>Falcon</cite> makes it back to Ring Space ahead of the flare, but severely damaged and seemingly picked apart and reconstituted. Elvi and Fayez are alive, but hurt (she&rsquo;s missing a chunk of her thigh; he&rsquo;s missing a foot). Most of the rest of the crew, including Sagale, are dead. Medina is gone. The <cite>Eye of the Storm</cite> is gone. Two gates have been removed from the configuration: the empty one with the black hole and the one opposite it, which contained a whole colony, now irretrievably cut off.</p>
<p>Soon after, there is another blackout event affecting everyone in all systems. The station in Ring Space glows and the black emptiness between the gates now shimmers with fluorescence. Duarte, who has absorbed a lot of protomolecule technology is not affected as a human, but is rendered catatonic. Cortázar is not upset about this, as he sees the opportunity to move forward with experiments on Duarte&rsquo;s daughter Teresa. Teresa has met Holden a few times, but is very good friends with Timothy, who lives in a cave off of the State grounds. It&rsquo;s Amos, of course, playing a long game.</p>
<p>With an incredible naiveté that she&rsquo;s not being followed or tracked, Teresa sneaks out to visit Timothy. He receives her, but knows better.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;She hugged him. It was like hugging a tree. He pulled back, and when he looked at her, she thought there was something like regret in his expression. It couldn’t have been pity.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 221</div></div><p>Amos is one of the greatest characters I&rsquo;ve had the pleasure of getting to know in a long time. Maybe Leonard from Hap and Leonard is as good. The Laconian soldiers following Teresa manage to kill Amos, who gives up his life charging them, taking out several of them, and making sure to shield Teresa from any possible harm from troopers who should be just as concerned with her safety, but who are overzealous in their attack.</p>
<p>When they return to his cave, they find a nuclear bomb, but no body. The strange dogs have dragged him off—presumably for repair.</p>
<p>Admiral Trejo leaves Sol System for Laconia, ostensibly because he&rsquo;s no longer needed in Sol System, but really because he needs to run the empire in Duarte&rsquo;s stead. Bobbie wants to push the military advantage (using the antimatter somehow) and Naomi also sees that lying in wait, playing the long game, may no longer be appropriate since Laconia no longer has any control over any of its systems. Bobbie wants to destroy the <cite>Tempest</cite> and take out the second of the three <em>Magnetar</em>-class ships (the first had just disappeared during the &ldquo;event&rdquo;).</p>
<p>Bobbie, Naomi, and Alex devise a plan of attack where Bobbie floats the antimatter bomb in close enough while Alex distracts the flagship with the <em>Gathering Storm</em>. Bobbie&rsquo;s ship is damaged, so she carried the antimatter bomb in her arms while diving straight at the cruiser in her battle armor. She goes out in a blaze of glory.</p>
<p>The blackout events increase in frequency, though, so far, humanity is proving more resilient to the attacks than the protomolecule builders. It&rsquo;s only a matter of time before the before the dark aliens from another universe figure out how to do real damage.</p>
<p>Naomi, meanwhile, leads the attack on Laconia itself, with 400 ships drawing away the major force so that Naomi&rsquo;s crushing blow on the orbiting, protomolecule shipyards can be delivered, destroying Laconia&rsquo;s ability to produce any more Magnetar-class destroyers.</p>
<p>Naomi and Alex land the <em>Rocinante</em> on Laconia to pick up Holden and Teresa, who&rsquo;ve managed to escape together. Hot on their heels are Laconian stormtroopers, though. To no-one&rsquo;s surprise, Amos rescues them all, having been turned into an unkillable machine by the strange dogs of Laconia. He has a connection to the protomolecule and a connection to the others who&rsquo;ve been transformed in the same way—and he knows that the aliens from the beyond will never stop hunting humanity.</p>
<p>Evie gets leverage on Trejo and forces him to come to a peace agreement with the underground, with Naomi.</p>
<p>So that&rsquo;s the plot summary. I&rsquo;ve also lifted a few citations and my ripostes from the list below.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;That’s the thing about autocracy. It looks pretty decent while it still looks pretty decent. Survivable, anyway. And it keeps looking like that right up until it doesn’t. That’s how you find out it’s too late.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 88</div></div><p>I like this very much.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Elvi’s voice sounded outraged, even to her. “The last time we made them angry, they turned off every consciousness in the Sol system and there was a massive surge in virtual particle activity. They fired a bullet that broke spooky interactions in ways we’re still trying to make sense of. Every one of those things defies our understanding of how reality works. So we’re going to throw a bomb at them?”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 110</div></div><p>We honestly don&rsquo;t know if it&rsquo;s natural or due to an intelligence. Maybe it&rsquo;s just an automated system still running. Like a mine in a minefield. You have no idea what&rsquo;s going on, but you persist in trying to determine the rules. It could backfire spectacularly.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;“I think we have a resistance right now because we have a lot of old guys who grew up resisting an enemy too strong to ever beat. They’ve been inoculated against fear of failure. But when they’re gone, I think we’re done. As a movement. As a force in history. Because we’re not going to convince anyone born after the Transport Union was formed to fight an unwinnable fight.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 121</div></div><p>This is kind of how the fight against capitalism feels. But patience is called for. It may not happen in your lifetime, but it will, eventually, happen, Once desperation exceeds the will-to-live, the boot-heel at people&rsquo;s necks always, eventually, inspires resistance.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Duarte and his people were smart. They kept things from getting bad too quickly. They made the right speeches about respect and autonomy. They let people believe that government by a king would never go wrong. And by the time it did, and things got bad enough to inspire a younger resistance, she and Alex and the old-school OPA would be off the board. Then who would be left to fight? Why would they think there was any hope in it?&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 123</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;If they started pushing a dozen other ships through, the enemy might not understand the high consul’s point.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 210</div></div><p>They might miss it anyway. Maybe they like all the energy. Beating a masochist has the opposite of the intended effect, but you have no idea if you don&rsquo;t know what a masochist is.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Candidly, I don’t like it. We’re going up against something we don’t understand with unfamiliar tools on a battlefield whose constraints we’re working out as we go along. It’s a stupid war, but it’s ours. If it can be won, I intend to win it. You’re going to help me.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 271</div></div><p>Hard pass. Humanity is doomed to be led by pinheads who reach for a club at every opportunity. They know nothing else. They see their own unquenchable and implacable greed, pettiness, and violence in everyone else.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Probably it had sounded persuasive to Laconian ears. The bone-deep assumption that all things Laconian were good and all opposition evil made for a hell of a blind spot when it came to writing propaganda.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 352</div></div><p>They&rsquo;ve got to know they&rsquo;re talking about America, don&rsquo;t they? Or do they think that they&rsquo;re describing China? Or any one of America&rsquo;s enemies?</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;As long as Laconia had the capacity to make ships like the Tempest and the Typhoon, it could never grow past being an oppressor. The dream of empire could only die if the ancient Martian dream of independence through better technology was put to rest.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 383</div></div><p>I guess that&rsquo;s a good point? You have to destroy advanced technology because people will only use it to conquer, to rule. It could be put to better use, but it won&rsquo;t.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;“The problem is it’s hard to reconcile when you’ve lost,” Naomi said. “Someone takes all the power, and you try to bring them into the fold again? That’s capitulation. I don’t think violence solves anything, not even this. Not even now. But maybe winning puts us in a place that we can be gracious.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 414</div></div><p>OMG hahahaha. This is the closest we can get to diplomacy anymore. Maybe all this band of bonobo upstarts we arrogantly call the top of the food chain is capable of.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;Trejo put down the hand terminal. His coffee sloshed over the lip of its cup, staining the white linen. “We are in a war—”</p>
<p>&ldquo;“Yes, you should fix that too.”</p>
<p>&ldquo;“Excuse me?&rdquo;</p>
<p>&ldquo;“You should stop being in a war. Send the underground a fruit basket or something. Start peace talks. I don’t know. However that works. I said it before, and I meant it. If you want peace, lose gracefully. We have bigger problems.”&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 505</div></div><p>All-around, good advice.</p>
<p><hr></p>
<div class="footnote-reference"><span id="footnote_DRAFTABLE_ENTRY_4439_1_body" class="footnote-number">[1]</span> Disclaimer: these are notes I took while reading this book. They include citations I found interesting or enlightening or particularly well-written. In some cases, I&rsquo;ve pointed out which of these applies to which citation; in others, I have not. Any benefit you gain from reading these notes is purely incidental to the purpose they serve of reminding me of what I once read. Please see Wikipedia for a summary if I&rsquo;ve failed to provide one sufficient for your purposes. If my notes serve to trigger an interest in this book, then I&rsquo;m happy for you.</div><h2>Citations</h2><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The part where Duarte was complicit in the vast slaughter on Earth that defined Avasarala’s career got skipped over. History was in the process of being rewritten by the winners. Holden was pretty sure that even though it didn’t make it into the press releases and state newsfeeds, everyone remembered that she and Duarte had been on opposite sides, back in the day. And if they didn’t, he certainly did.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 5</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;She taught us to use everything shameful in our lives as a weapon to humiliate people who would diminish us.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 8</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Kajri smiled. “The people who have power over you are weak too. They shit and bleed and worry that their children don’t love them anymore. They’re embarrassed by the stupid things they did when they were young that everyone else has forgotten. And so they’re vulnerable. We all define ourselves by the people around us, because that’s the kind of monkey we are. We can’t transcend it. So when they watch you, they hand you the power to change what they are too.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 8</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;On the view screen, a single faintly green diamond with a machine-perfect smooth surface floating in a solar system with no other planets, orbiting one fading white dwarf star.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 16</div></div><p>I&rsquo;m getting <cite>Roadside Picnic</cite> vibes again.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;“One thousand three hundred and seventy three times that we know of,” Ilich said. “That’s a lot.”</p>
<p>&ldquo;The colony worlds—Sol system included—were only on the gate network because there had been life for the Romans to hijack. A few hundred systems in a galaxy of billions. Ilich was old enough that anything more than one was miraculous to him. Teresa hadn’t grown up in a lonely universe the way the colonel had. She’d grown up in a lonely universe the way she had, and the two didn’t compare.&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 45</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;There are people I love. There are people who have loved me. I fought for what I believed, protected those I could, and stood my ground against the encroaching darkness. Good enough.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 75</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;That’s the thing about autocracy. It looks pretty decent while it still looks pretty decent. Survivable, anyway. And it keeps looking like that right up until it doesn’t. That’s how you find out it’s too late.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 88</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;whenever they spoke, he was polite and unthreatening. Even a little amused by everything in a vague, philosophical kind of way that made it easy to be polite back.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 97</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;“I’ve been around wet soil before,” she said, almost defensive. “That smell’s called petrichor. It’s actinomycete spores.”</p>
<p>&ldquo;“I didn’t know that,” Holden said. “It’s a good smell. I miss it.”&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 97</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;That’s the point of a dancing bear. It’s the least dangerous thing at the court, because everyone’s aware of it. The ones you trust are always the most dangerous. A lot more kings and princesses got poisoned by their friends than eaten by bears.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 99</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Fayez pulled a jar of scalp cream out of a cabinet and began rubbing it into her short, tight curls with his fingertips. It felt wonderful to have him massaging her head. When you find a man who takes pleasure in helping you avoid dry scalp, Elvi thought, you keep him. “You can do that all day if you want,” she said. “If we had all day, my attentions would begin moving south,” he replied with a grin.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 105</div></div><p>Why the fuck is everybody so horny all of the time? Aren&rsquo;t these two in their sixties?</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;“Because one of two things is true,” Sagale said. “Either there is an intelligence that lies beyond those gates that is making the choice to destroy our ships, or there is some natural effect of the gate system itself that does it. This is how we will determine that.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 110</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Elvi’s voice sounded outraged, even to her. “The last time we made them angry, they turned off every consciousness in the Sol system and there was a massive surge in virtual particle activity. They fired a bullet that broke spooky interactions in ways we’re still trying to make sense of. Every one of those things defies our understanding of how reality works. So we’re going to throw a bomb at them?”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 110</div></div><p>We honestly don&rsquo;t know if it&rsquo;s natural or due to an intelligence. Maybe it&rsquo;s just an automated system still running. Like a mine in a minefield. You have no idea what&rsquo;s going on, but you persist in trying to determine the rules. It could backfire spectacularly.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Maybe it was something that happened with every generation, this sense of displacement. It might be an artifact of the way human minds seemed to peg “normal” to whatever they’d experienced first and then bristled at everything afterward that failed to match it closely enough.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 116</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;“Well, for me, it looks like dying with the knowledge that humanity’s a little bit better off than it would have been if I’d never been born. A little freer. A little kinder. A little smarter. That the bullies and bastards and sadists got their teeth into a few less people because of me. That’s got to be enough.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 120</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;“She is right,” Bobbie said, turning back to her inventory. “It’s just I’m right too. Naomi wants there to be one way to fix this, and she wants it to be the one where there’s no blood.&ldquo;</p>
<p>&ldquo;“But there’s two ways,” Alex said, thinking that he was agreeing.</p>
<p>&ldquo;“There’s no way,” Bobbie said. “There’s just pushing back with everything we’ve got and hoping we can outlast the bastards.”&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 120</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;“I think we have a resistance right now because we have a lot of old guys who grew up resisting an enemy too strong to ever beat. They’ve been inoculated against fear of failure. But when they’re gone, I think we’re done. As a movement. As a force in history. Because we’re not going to convince anyone born after the Transport Union was formed to fight an unwinnable fight.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 121</div></div><p>This is kind of how the fight against capitalism feels. But patience is called for. It may not happen in your lifetime, but it will, eventually, happen, Once desperation exceeds the will-to-live, the boot-heel at people&rsquo;s necks always, eventually, inspires resistance.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Or maybe it was the idea of his kid getting married. Or maybe it was that he was a little smarter than she was, or a little less angry, or a little more realistic. Maybe it was that he’d seen a little sooner than she had why the fight was unwinnable.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 122</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Duarte and his people were smart. They kept things from getting bad too quickly. They made the right speeches about respect and autonomy. They let people believe that government by a king would never go wrong. And by the time it did, and things got bad enough to inspire a younger resistance, she and Alex and the old-school OPA would be off the board. Then who would be left to fight? Why would they think there was any hope in it?&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 123</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;He had a way of shifting his attention so that she felt like he was actually listening, not just preparing a reply in his head and waiting for her to stop talking. He focused on her the way he did on the wood he carved or the food he cooked. He didn’t judge her. He didn’t quiz her. She never worried that he would be disappointed with what she said.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 143</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;He considered that. “Maybe it’s because he thinks your dad’s an asshole.”</p>
<p>&ldquo;“My dad’s not an asshole. And Holden’s a killer. He doesn’t get to judge other people.”</p>
<p>&ldquo;“Your dad’s kind of an asshole,” Timothy said, his expression philosophical, his voice matter-of-fact. “And he’s killed a lot more people than Holden ever did.”</p>
<p>&ldquo;“That’s different. That’s war. He had to do it or else no one would have been able to organize everyone. We’d just have stumbled into the next conflict unprepared. My dad’s trying to save us.”</p>
<p>&ldquo;Timothy held up a finger like she’d made his point for him. “Now you’re telling me why it’s okay he’s an asshole.”&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 143</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The chief engineer coughed out a laugh. “Of course I do. Anyone in the Belt’s going to know Naomi fucking Nagata. It’s just these Laconian fucks who can’t see what they’re looking at. And again, it’s a real honor.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 158</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;She pointed one thumb toward the monitor. “That’s not science. ‘Light shit on fire and see what happens’ isn’t science. This is throwing dynamite into a pond to see if any fish float to the top.”</p>
<p>&ldquo;“So . . . natural philosophy?”</p>
<p>&ldquo;“Military bullshit. Solving every problem by trying to blow it up.”&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 160</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;[…] don’t like things that can only happen once. You can’t make sense of something when there’s no pattern. One data point is the same as none.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 161</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;“You know what would be funny?” Fayez said. “If this whole blowing-things-up plan broke the gate and we were all trapped here on this ship for the rest of our lives with no way home.”</p>
<p>&ldquo;Sagale glowered and cleared his throat.</p>
<p>&ldquo;“You’re right,” Fayez said. “Too soon.”&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 162</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;[…] maybe I used to think it was enough to spit in my enemy’s eye while he strangles me. But I’ve been thinking about Jillian’s assessment of the objective value of moral victories, and she wasn’t wrong either.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 174</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;“Easy to make rules,” Emma said. “Easy to make systems with a perfect logic and rigor. All you need to do is leave out the mercy, yeah? Then when you put people into it and they get chewed to nothing, it’s the person’s fault. Not the rules. Everything we do that’s worth shit, we’ve done with people. Flawed, stupid, lying, rules-breaking people. Laconians making the same mistake as ever. Our rules are good, and they’d work perfectly if it were only a different species.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 182</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;[…] it was showing a schematic of the slow zone—the gates, the alien station at their center, Medina Station, and a few dozen ships scattered through 750 trillion cubic kilometers. A space smaller than the interior of a star.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 202</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;It was like hearing that sometimes you woke up in the morning and didn’t have a color anymore. That red could die. Or that three could be shot off the number line. Learning that a gate could be destroyed was like learning that a rule of her universe so basic that she’d never even thought of it as a rule had been violated. If he’d said You actually have two bodies or Sometimes you can walk through walls or You can also breathe rock, it wouldn’t have felt stranger. More displacing.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 203</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;[…] we can show the enemy that we are disciplined. Or we can show it that we aren’t.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 205</div></div><p>And the enemy can do the same? Except that it&rsquo;s much stronger?</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;“That star wasn’t natural, it was created. And it was created from a system that looked like Sol. It was manufactured and it was pointed at the ring gate. They aimed it like tying a shotgun trigger to a doorknob. Our bomb ship did something to activate it. Maybe it got something to come look at us, and that’s what set it off. I don’t know. But it was built to be a booby trap.”</p>
<p>&ldquo;Sagale’s scowl looked like he’d bitten into a bad date. “That is an interesting interpretation,” he said.&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 208</div></div><p>OMG how had that not occurred to you geniuses, acting like you&rsquo;re training a civilization capable of building gates and reconfiguring entire star systems. The hubris is breathtaking. The arrogance of the military mind.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Trouble started long before Laconia existed. Ships have been disappearing for decades. Whatever this is, it began before we recognized it.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 209</div></div><p>You don&rsquo;t know that. You&rsquo;ve accepted your hypothesis of willful malevolence as truth, without evidence. It could be natural reaction based on physics we don&rsquo;t understand.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;If they started pushing a dozen other ships through, the enemy might not understand the high consul’s point.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 210</div></div><p>They might miss it anyway. Maybe they like all the energy. Beating a masochist has the opposite of the intended effect, but you have no idea if you don&rsquo;t know what a masochist is.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Distributed responsibility is the problem. One person gives the order, another carries it out. One can say they didn’t pull the trigger, the other that they were just doing what they were told, and everyone lets themselves off the hook.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 212</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;She hugged him. It was like hugging a tree. He pulled back, and when he looked at her, she thought there was something like regret in his expression. It couldn’t have been pity.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 221</div></div><p>Amos is one of the greatest characters I&rsquo;ve had the pleasure of getting to know in a long time. Maybe Leonard from Hap and Leonard is as good.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;She still had decades in her, if she kept her treatments and exercise regimen up. The universe she died in might still be better than the one she lived in now, but she had a hard time believing it would be better than the one she’d been born into. Too much had been lost, and what wasn’t lost was changed beyond her ability to understand it.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 241</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Duarte was a thoughtful, educated, civilized man and a murderer. He was charming and funny and a little melancholy and, as far as Holden could tell, completely unaware of his own monstrous ambition. Like a religious fanatic, the man really believed that everything he’d done was justified by his goal in doing it. Even when it was the push for his own personal immortality—and then his daughter’s—before slamming the door behind them, Duarte managed to cast it as a necessary burden for the good of the species. He was above all else a charming little ratfuck. As Holden grew to respect the man, even to like him, he was careful never to lose sight of the fact that Duarte was a monster.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 247</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;It was dangerous for someone with one expertise to try to interpret something in a different but similar field. Laypeople didn’t understand how much scientific literature was about nuance and shared understanding. Even with expert systems to help, she was more likely to avoid errors with one of Jen Lively’s physics analyses than her own medical records, if only because she knew that she didn’t know physics.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 266</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Candidly, I don’t like it. We’re going up against something we don’t understand with unfamiliar tools on a battlefield whose constraints we’re working out as we go along. It’s a stupid war, but it’s ours. If it can be won, I intend to win it. You’re going to help me.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 271</div></div><p>Hard pass. Humanity is doomed to be led by pinheads who reach for a club at every opportunity. They know nothing else. They see their own unquenchable and implacable greed, pettiness, and violence in everyone else.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The scale of it all was too big. There were too many billion people in too many hundred solar systems for anyone to really understand. For any human to really understand.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 272</div></div><p>Just the nations on a planet are too big to understand.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;“The original bodies died twenty years ago, more or less,” Cortázar said. “These artifacts that were built from them have been static since their recovery.”</p>
<p>&ldquo;“So they’ll always be young?”</p>
<p>&ldquo;“Well. They’ll always look like immature human beings,” Cortázar said. “That’s not exactly the same thing. They have, for the most part, similar structures and chemistry to the original bodies, only very stable. Telomeres don’t shorten. Mitosis can run indefinitely. There’s no buildup of senescent cells or plaques. The immune response has a couple additional pathways and structures that are interesting. Really very nice work.”&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 299</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Evolution was a paste-and-baling-wire process that came up with half-assed solutions like pushing teeth through babies’ gums and menstruation. Survival of the fittest was a technical term that covered a lot more close-enough-is-close-enough than actual design.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 302</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;In his last days, her grandfather talked sometimes about how weirdly clear his early memories had become. He might not quite remember the name of his nurse or when the man had last been to check on him, but the details of his childhood were vivid and immediate. Like the past was growing stronger as his present and future wore thin. He told the story about seeing a living cat for the first time, and how strange it had felt to hold it, with the same awe in his voice every time.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 307</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;It was a strange thought. They were torturing Holden right now over political differences. They’d killed Timothy, and maybe Timothy had come to Laconia to kill them. And now here they were, all pretending that a long-dead man’s barely concealed penis was a symbol of how much they were all in it together. This was stupid. It was worse than stupid. It was dishonest.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 320</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The stars of the galactic disk spread against the horizonless sky. Some of that light had been traveling for centuries. Millennia. Longer. Many of those stars would have died long before she was born. What a weird fate for a photon to be spat out of a nuclear fireball, speed through the vast emptiness between stars, and land on a Martian Marine’s retina while she decided whether she still feared death, or if she was ready. She’d done this a dozen times before.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 330</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The work in Cortázar’s lab was punishing. There were a couple of decent virtual context translators in the lab. They helped enough that when his notes were couched in terms of nanoinformatics—complex imaginary information loss, Deriner functions, implicit multipliers—she could understand it in exo-biological terms like functional regulation site persistence across generations. How either or both of them would ever be able to make the issues clear to Admiral Trejo, she couldn’t imagine. But she’d been able to explain convergent evolution to undergraduates, once upon a time. So maybe she’d come up with something.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 343</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;“We did the thing in the first place,” Trejo said. His voice was getting a rasp to it. Frustration or fear or anger. “Why can’t we undo it?”</p>
<p>&ldquo;“The same reason we can’t stir milk back out of coffee or unscramble an egg. Physics is full of things that only work in one direction. This is one.”&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 346</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Probably it had sounded persuasive to Laconian ears. The bone-deep assumption that all things Laconian were good and all opposition evil made for a hell of a blind spot when it came to writing propaganda.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 352</div></div><p>They&rsquo;ve got to know they&rsquo;re talking about America, don&rsquo;t they? Or do they think that they&rsquo;re describing China? Or any one of America&rsquo;s enemies?</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Wars never ended because one side was defeated. They ended because the enemies were reconciled. Anything else was just a postponement of the next round of violence.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 357</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;As long as Laconia had the capacity to make ships like the Tempest and the Typhoon, it could never grow past being an oppressor. The dream of empire could only die if the ancient Martian dream of independence through better technology was put to rest.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 383</div></div><p>I guess that&rsquo;s a good point? You have to destroy advanced technology because people will only use it to conquer, to rule. It could be put to better use, but it won&rsquo;t.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;But it was interesting that none of Cortázar’s work on Duarte seemed to have resulted in the high consul’s getting access to the library, and the weird turning-off of consciousness hadn’t broken Cara and Xan the way it had Duarte. There was a clue in there somewhere. She had the dataset. She just needed the right grid to put over it, and the pattern would make sense. She could feel it.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 390</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;“Like we don’t have a steel chamber in fusion reactors. We have magnetic bottles. Magnetic fields that perform the same basic function as matter. The older civilization appears to have developed its consciousness in a form that relied more on energetic fields and maybe structures in unobservable matter than the stuff we made a brain from. There’s also some implication that quantum effects have something to do with our being aware. If that’s true for us, it was probably true for them.</p>
<p>&ldquo;“My thesis—the one I was working on before I came here—explored the idea that our brains are kind of a field combat version of consciousness. Not too complex. Not a lot of bells and whistles, but takes a lot of punishment and keeps functioning. Our brain may actually have a kick-starting effect, so when the quantum interactions that underlie having experiences break down, they’re easier to start up again. Does that make sense?”&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 394</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;What I suspect—and I don’t have any data for this—is that the enemy figured out how to snuff out all the systems at once, whether the gates were active or not. I believe that our travel through the gates is irritating to these beings. Maybe even damaging in some way. When that damage gets high enough, they react.”</p>
<p>&ldquo;“So when I killed Pallas Station in Sol . . . ,” Trejo said. “You also hit some weird, aphysical dark god in whatever passes for its nose,” Elvi said. “And they did what you’d expect them to do. If you get sick and a penicillin shot makes you better, then the next time you get sick, you try another shot. Only it turns out we aren’t the same kind of conscious system as the gate makers. We don’t break as easy, and we recover better. What slaughtered their civilization just lost us a few minutes of time.”&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 395</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;“I believe that the enemy, whatever it is, is experimenting with new ways to break conscious systems. Brains. I think we’re the equivalent of a penicillin-resistant infection, and the last event we experienced was an attempt at tetracycline.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 396</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;“I do,” Elvi said, and she was surprised by the steel in her own voice. Trejo heard it too. “I’m hearing you say you can’t handle this. You want the fight with the underground over with? Easy to do. Surrender.”</p>
<p>&ldquo;“Your jokes aren’t funny,” he said.</p>
<p>&ldquo;“They aren’t when they’re not jokes.”&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 398</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;“The problem is it’s hard to reconcile when you’ve lost,” Naomi said. “Someone takes all the power, and you try to bring them into the fold again? That’s capitulation. I don’t think violence solves anything, not even this. Not even now. But maybe winning puts us in a place that we can be gracious.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 414</div></div><p>OMG hahahaha. This is the closest we can get to diplomacy anymore. Maybe all this band of bonobo upstarts we arrogantly call the top of the food chain is capable of.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;“It does . . . record?” Cara said. “That’s not the right word. It’s not like memory, exactly. It’s more like everything all at once? Like the way a film is all the pictures that tell the story, and they’re all there even when you only see one at a time? I’m not explaining this right.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 428</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;Cara and Alexander died, and the drones made something out of the dead flesh. When you talk to that girl, she isn’t there. Something is, maybe. And it’s made from parts of a human, the way I could stitch together a model catapult from chicken bones. You’re anthropomorphizing them.”</p>
<p>&ldquo;“Is it a problem?”</p>
<p>&ldquo;“It’s inaccurate,” Cortázar said.&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 430</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Cortázar sat on the floor, his legs folding under him, and then slumped to the side with a long, wet exhalation. The left half of his head was missing from the jaw to the crown. His heart was still trying to beat in the open theater of his ribs, but the man was gone.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 434</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;“And Major? I know you were a civilian before you were appointed. You didn’t come up like the rest of us, so I’m going to make this clear for you. If you say one more word about surrendering the empire? I will have you before a court-martial, and then I will have you shot. This is a war now. The rules have changed.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 436</div></div><p>She doesn&rsquo;t have to to take that. He needs her. He will get rid of her anyway once she&rsquo;s no longer useful. It&rsquo;s purely adversarial. She will not be rewarded for a job well done. She will not earn goodwill. Some people just use others and need to be in control. The only thing you can do is exert force by withholding services.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;“With them gone, the bad guys are going to have more guns for us,” Alex said. “We’re about to get real bumpy.”</p>
<p>&ldquo;“What the hell has it been up to now?” Ian asked.</p>
<p>&ldquo;“Walk in the park, kid,” Alex said.&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 470</div></div><p>I love Alex.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;She’d had enough conversations with him now to know he was telling a joke without his voice signaling that it was a joke. No one else in her social life did that, and she found it irrationally annoying. It made every exchange into a puzzle that had to be decoded to see if it was sincere or not. She pushed the irritation away. There were a lot of things people did that she’d never had to be patient about. It was time to start learning that skill.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 480</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;“Well, you know how it is.” Amos turned his dark eyes to her and nodded down at the snow where Ilich lay, still wheezing. “Hey there, Tiny. This guy a friend of yours?”</p>
<p>&ldquo;Teresa started to say yes, and then no, and then she understood what he was asking. “No,” she said. “He’s not on my side.”</p>
<p>&ldquo;“All right,” Amos said, and fired the pistol twice. The muzzle flash was the brightest thing in the world.&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 484</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;“If I am in distress, being held against my will. Threatened. Whatever. Is there a phrase I use to indicate that? Something innocuous I can slip into any conversation without my captors knowing it?”</p>
<p>&ldquo;“I . . . That is—”</p>
<p>&ldquo;“It’s a yes-or-no question, Admiral. This isn’t hard.” At this rate, the Whirlwind was going to nuke them to be rid of the girl.</p>
<p>&ldquo;“There is, miss,” Admiral Gujarat said.</p>
<p>&ldquo;“And have I said it?”</p>
<p>&ldquo;“You haven’t.”</p>
<p>&ldquo;“Then we can take it as given that I am not here under duress. That something is going on between the high consul and the leadership of the underground—something with which I have been entrusted and you haven’t. With that in mind? Go. Back. To. Your. Post.”&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 492</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;But still, there were ways. There wouldn’t be a choke hold on the ring space the way there had been, but there could be a network of cheap, easily replaced relays that announced incoming and outgoing traffic. Ships could know, at least, what the chances were of going dutchman before they made the transit. There weren’t many people who’d choose to go through a ring gate if they knew they wouldn’t come out the other side. Give the people enough information, and they’d be able to make the right decisions on their own.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 497</div></div><p>I almost feel sorry for otherwise intelligent people who literally can&rsquo;t learn from.history. Not cynical enough? Dumb? Not Naomi. This is clearly the author&rsquo;s voice.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;She realized again that Trejo was waiting for her to respond. She didn’t know what he wanted her to say and didn’t care much either.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 503</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Jesus Christ, Elvi thought. Had Trejo always been this sanctimonious and she just hadn’t noticed? Or was she just really irritable right now?&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 504</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;Trejo put down the hand terminal. His coffee sloshed over the lip of its cup, staining the white linen. “We are in a war—”</p>
<p>&ldquo;“Yes, you should fix that too.”</p>
<p>&ldquo;“Excuse me?&rdquo;</p>
<p>&ldquo;“You should stop being in a war. Send the underground a fruit basket or something. Start peace talks. I don’t know. However that works. I said it before, and I meant it. If you want peace, lose gracefully. We have bigger problems.”&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 505</div></div>      </div>
      </div>
        <div class="footer">
    <div class="footer-data"><div class="footer-links"><ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/contact.php" title="">Contact</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/support.php" title="">Support</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/privacy.php" title="">Privacy</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/rights.php" title="">Rights</a></li></ul></div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="copyright">Copyright (c) 1999-2026 earthli.com. All Rights Reserved.</div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="versions">Powered by <ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore/app_news.php">earthli News 3.7</a></li><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore" title="">earthli WebCore&trade; 3.7</a></li></ul></div></div>    </div>
      </div>
  </div>  </body>
</html>
]]>
  </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
      <title type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[The Internet is not what you think it is: A History, a Philosophy, a Warning by Justin E.H. Smith (2022) (read in 2022)]]>
  </title>
    <id>https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=4495</id>
    <link href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=4495"/>
    <updated>2023-01-22T22:10:55+01:00</updated>
    <author>
        <name type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[Marco von Ballmoos]]>
  </name>
      <uri>https://earthli.com/users/marco</uri>
    </author>
      <summary type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<p><small class="notes">Standard disclaimer [1]</small></p>
<p><a href="https://www.earthli.com/data/news/attachments/entry/4495/the_internet_is_not_what_you_think_it_is_-_a_history,_a_philosophy,_a_warning.jpg"><img src="https://www.earthli.com/data/news/attachments/entry/4495/the_internet_is_not_what_you_think_it_is_-_a_history,_a_philosophy,_a_warning_tn.jpg" alt=" " class=" align-right"></a>I am often amazed by the holisticity [2] of my research, of how often I happen, by what seems like pure coincidence, to read about several interrelated things. This book starts off in a direction vaguely similar to <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=4447">Amusing Ourselves to Death</a>, but becomes much more. It addresses... [<a class="complete-text-link" href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=4495">More</a>]</p>
]]>
  </summary>
      <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<html lang="en">
  <head>
    <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/themes/ice.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/fonts/raleway.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/core/medium.css">
  </head>
  <body>
<div class="style-controls">  <div class="page">
    <div class="page-body">
<div class="info-box-top">
<p>
Published by <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_user.php?name=marco" title="Marco von Ballmoos" class="visible">marco</a> on <span class="date-time">22. Jan 2023 22:10:55 (GMT-5)</span>
</p>
<p>
Updated by <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_user.php?name=marco" title="Marco von Ballmoos" class="visible">marco</a> on <span class="date-time">30. Jan 2023 22:53:42 (GMT-5)</span>
</p>
</div>
      <div class="text-flow wide">
  <p><small class="notes">Standard disclaimer [1]</small></p>
<p><a href="https://www.earthli.com/data/news/attachments/entry/4495/the_internet_is_not_what_you_think_it_is_-_a_history,_a_philosophy,_a_warning.jpg"><img src="https://www.earthli.com/data/news/attachments/entry/4495/the_internet_is_not_what_you_think_it_is_-_a_history,_a_philosophy,_a_warning_tn.jpg" alt=" " class=" align-right"></a>I am often amazed by the holisticity [2] of my research, of how often I happen, by what seems like pure coincidence, to read about several interrelated things. This book starts off in a direction vaguely similar to <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=4447">Amusing Ourselves to Death</a>, but becomes much more. It addresses some of the same topics as <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=4491">No One is Talking About This</a>, but goes much further, investigates the phenomenon of the Internet much more deeply, places it more firmly in the flow of history.</p>
<p>I&rsquo;ve been a reader of the author&rsquo;s essays for quite some time and find him to be one of the more entertaining and educational writers I follow, in the sense of actually learning useful things that I&rsquo;d never thought to know before. Though superficially vastly different, we share more than a few similarities in our paths through life. We both grew up in the United States, we are almost the same age, we seem to be focused on learning, we played some of the same video games, listened to a lot of the same music, watched the same television, read many of the same books, etc. We&rsquo;re both living in Europe now.</p>
<p>He is, of course, far more erudite, having learned or developed a strong familiarity with many more languages than I. He also seems to have read so much more of what is available from centuries past. He is a scholar. I am a dilettante. I&rsquo;ve had more of a focus on the actual task of putting computer science into practice, more of a focus on the 20th century and, perhaps, the 21st.</p>
<p>To whit, the similarities strike me immediately, on the first pages,</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;[…] it is the weaving together of several ideas into a filament thick enough to serve further on as a bright guiding thread through the rest of modern history up to the present day: the idea that natural language can be formalized; the idea that formal language can be processed by machines; the idea that human reason can be outsourced to these machines to make decisions for us; the idea that all things are interconnected&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 4</div></div><p>And, out of the gate, a discussion of the metaphor of weaving and how so much of the course of human knowledge and the gathering thereof has related itself to the process of weaving and &ldquo;threads&rdquo; of knowledge. And here I find myself newly employed for a company [3] that produces machines that analyze the quality of <em>actual cloth threads</em>. Life is funny.</p>
<p>But, back to the review. The meandering in my own review will perhaps give you a flavor of the distances that the author ranges in his treatment of the history, potential, and failings of the Internet. He is a fearless spelunker in the archives of the far past, seeking and finding analogous technologies and situations in decidedly less technologically advanced times—even in the natural world, outside of the species (whale songs were telecommunication long before the telegraph).</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;To some extent, telecommunication just is amplification: simply to speak to a person in a normal voice is already to telecommunicate, even if at naturally audible distances we have learned to be unimpressed by this most of the time.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 61</div></div><p>Even people talking to one another is technically telecommunication—it&rsquo;s just so common that it has receded into the background and is no longer considered to be amazing. This, despite the fact that we don&rsquo;t really know how it works. I mean, we know how some of it works, right? It&rsquo;s pretty amazing technology, though not man-made, not really. I think something (however that works), it excites certain neurons. I want to say something, other parts of the brain are engaged to begin the act of encoding what I&rsquo;m thinking into phonemes, actualized by my moving the many, many muscles in my mouth and tongue in an exquisite ballet that manipulates air molecules into a stream that produces waves in other air molecules, spreading outward, slowly ebbing into silence. </p>
<p>Before it does, though, those moving air molecules strike the tympani of my conversational partner, this incredibly sensitive organ that can detect movements in air that nothing else on our bodies can, and that tympani transforms those vibrations back into electrical signals that journey up a chain of axons until it strikes the neurons of the brain of my conversational partner, where—as the old cartoon says—&rdquo;a miracle occurs&rdquo; and those signals are transformed through the simulacra of the world my partner holds in her mind and she understands an approximation of my intent, hopefully a relatively accurate one. It&rsquo;s gobsmacking and beautiful and insanely intricate and complicated and we take it so for granted that we disparage it relative to the relatively clumsy technological copies of the process that we&rsquo;ve managed to construct.</p>
<p>Anyway, where as I? Oh, yes, Justin E.H. Smith wrote a book about the Internet. This is why I read him: not only for the knowledge and lore imparted, not only for the superior writing style and the delightful vocabulary, but because of its thought-provoking nature (I like the word <em>Gedankenanstoss</em>).</p>
<p>What is the book about? Perhaps this thesis statement is a good start.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The principal charges against the internet, deserving of our attention here, instead have to do with the ways in which it has limited our potential and our capacity for thriving, the ways in which it has distorted our nature and fettered us. Let us enumerate them.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 9</div></div><p>Not all of the book is as purely esoteric as I&rsquo;ve made it out to be. There are some very down-to-Earth bits with an examination of the—admittedly, thus far largely corrosive and not at all achieving its non-corrosive potential—influence that the Internet is having on human behavior, especially as it affects how we live and work and … be.</p>
<p>For example, we have clearly allowed the same drive to capitalize every facet of our existence take over the Internet as well. This one-size-fits-all solution has already proven quite detrimental and is largely to blame for the curve of potential we saw in the mid-90s begin to bend so quickly and precipitously back downward.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Private companies have thus moved in to take care of basic functions necessary for civil society, but without assuming any real responsibility to society. This, too, is a diminution of the political freedom of citizens of democracy, understood as the power to contribute to decisions concerning our social life and collective well-being.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 9</div></div><p>Not only that, but the profit motive has led to an optimization not for any societally beneficial purpose—to which the Internet would, in principle, be eminently suited—but to manipulate our amazing biology in the coarsest possible manner to elicit impressions from us that can be converted to digital Internet points, which eventually wander their way back to a currency that means something in the real world. Instead of teaching us how to be better, wiser, more empathetic, they have chosen to pick the lower-hanging fruit and farm our dopamine for profit. It&rsquo;s a sad, sad local maximum in the vast landscape of potential that revealed itself at the beginning of this whole experiment.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The great engine that is fed upon countless little nibbles of individual human attention, and that must constantly solicit such attention if it is to get fed, runs much more effectively, and is much better able to indulge its voracious appetite, when it appeals to human passion than to human reason, when it entices our first-order desire for dopamine-fueled gratification, than when it invites us to cultivate moral character or pursue long-term goals of betterment of self or world.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 16</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;This then is the second new problem of the internet era: the way in which the emerging extractive economy threatens our ability to use our mental faculty of attention in a way that is conducive to human thriving.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 17</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;[…] those individuals will thrive most, or believe themselves to thrive most, in this new system who are able convincingly to present themselves not as subjects at all, but as attention-grabbing sets of data points.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 20</div></div><p>This is how it always was, though, no? To others, to society, one is what one has to offer. Worth today is perhaps more crassly assigned to, or, perhaps more accurately, withheld from, individuals, than in the past, but it&rsquo;s not radically different. We are talking about a diminution of altruism, which was always a slippery concept.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Corporations will manipulate people into behaving as if they were video-game players, and these same people will adopt an understanding of their own freely chosen pursuits in life as if life were a video game.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 45</div></div><p>It&rsquo;s bad enough that this is all ruining us psychically and ruining relationships and human functioning, but it&rsquo;s also ruining societal functioning.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;This leaves many people with a civic education built on realities from the previous century wondering what to do: people who feel the need to “speak up” but are deeply averse to unproductive dialogue, especially when it is being controlled by corporate interests that do not want it to be productive.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 53</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Civic education has long been based on the idea that public engagement is good, that it is part of our duty as citizens to read the news, to write letters to editors, to talk to people in our social circles about important issues of the day. But the news is now mostly a current within the ocean of social media.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 53</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;[…] what we are seeing for now is a sort of perversion of collective deliberation, as people, some of them with sincere good will, seek to use what is essentially a privately owned point-scoring video game as if it were the public sphere.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 54</div></div><p>Even before we&rsquo;ve truly understood what a mess we&rsquo;ve made of the current Internet, we are already preparing to hand it off to AIs, which we will—for marketing and capitalization purposes—imbue with fantastical powers that they don&rsquo;t have, until we&rsquo;ve trained ourselves to be satisfied with the local maximum the AIs are able to create for us, until we don&rsquo;t even dream of anything beyond it. We don&rsquo;t even know how we think, but we&rsquo;re already theorizing about whether our inventions do. At the same time, we disparage the natural world, claiming that no-one else is as special as we are. So, other creatures could never be considered to be moral beings or &ldquo;really think&rdquo; or &ldquo;be conscious&rdquo;, but, of course, our AIs—granted majesty in the pantheon of creation by their having been created by us—are immediately fast-tracked into the on-deck circle.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;[…] there is no reason to think we are any closer to understanding how veraciously to simulate canine olfaction, say, than we are to simulating human emotional response to music or reflection on the similarities between love and certain species of flower.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 98</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Nobody can explain how—according to what laws of nature—machine-run programs are supposed to become conscious of their own activity, any more than they could explain the principles that would have made the Brazen Head work.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 105</div></div><p>We don&rsquo;t even think that other <em>cultures</em> on this planet think, to say nothing of other <em>species</em>, or AIs. The Chinese, for example, have long been the focus of western Orientalist scrutiny, to the point where there&rsquo;s even a concept called a <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chinese_room">Chinese Room</a> (<cite><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/">Wikpedia</a></cite>), which basically just means that an entire country was once thought to be so inscrutable that Europe seriously considered the possibility that its individuals weren&rsquo;t individuals, not really, but functioned as part of some hive mind that simulated human activity sufficiently. It&rsquo;s a wild reminder that the bugs of the film <em>Starship Troopers</em> are absolutely a stand-in for every single enemy that the supposedly enlightened western so-called civilization [4] has ever had.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Since at least the seventeenth century, European observers have imagined Chinese people as being Chinese rooms, processing information and delivering rational and correct responses without any real conscious understanding of what they were doing; and China as a whole has been understood for equally long as a sort of “China brain,” functioning as a whole and as a true unity, rather than, in contrast with European nations, as a collection of individuals.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 109</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The Chinese are on this view, in effect, wise automata: doing everything rational agents do, but evidently without any true rationality grounding their action. They are like Descartes’s semblance of a man that moves about the street in a cloak and hat, and that so worried him in the second of his Meditations, but now multiplied to the size of a great nation. In sum, China and the specter of automation have long been two sides of the same coin in the history of European thought.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 109</div></div><p>Finally, Smith ends up at ontology, not only wondering what we are actually doing with information and knowledge, but how that relates to what really exists. Or what it even means to talk about what is real, which is, … um, ontology. At what point does the world online becomes more real than reality? At what level of luxury can that even happen? You still have to eat and keep the rain off, so reality will impinge if you neglect it too much for the new reality online.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;On most understandings of the ontology of a musical work, when we hear music streaming through Spotify or YouTube, we are hearing the music itself, and not just a representation of it. And much less or much more mysteriously (depending on your philosophical commitments), when we pay bills online, when we issue such speech acts as promises or threats via Facebook or Twitter, when we tell our loved ones we love them over Skype or Zoom, we are bringing about real transformations in the world, in our financial situation, in our social standing, in our hearts.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 164</div></div><p>What is the nature of reality? What does it mean to say you listened to a song? You listened to representation of a song streamed to you and converted through several formats, all of which stem from an initial vibration of air molecules striking a membrane in a microphone that translated those signals via piezoelectric sensors to analog electrical signals and then to a digital representation that was stored in individually aligned magnets or electrons in some storage medium.</p>
<p>What does it mean to say &ldquo;that&rsquo;s a table&rdquo;? Do you mean the table that you see? The picture made in your brain in a reaction to your retina picking up light waves bouncing off more solid atoms? Or did you touch the table? Your fingers reacted to those atoms, sent those signals up nerves, to form a different sort of picture in your brain, right? Or what if you took a Polaroid of the table. Many would still say, &ldquo;that&rsquo;s a table.&rdquo; But it&rsquo;s a picture of a table. Why do we allow the shortcut? How many shortcuts are allowed? If you took a picture of the picture, it all falls apart, right? Then, you&rsquo;d say &ldquo;that&rsquo;s a picture of a picture of a table&rdquo;, or just &ldquo;that&rsquo;s a picture of a picture.&rdquo; We accept certain abstractions as such strong representations of their originals that we don&rsquo;t even make a distinction anymore.</p>
<p>The article I have in my head and that I dutifully &ldquo;type&rdquo; (striking keys that transform kinetic motion into a series of bits that are recorded on a stream of other bits that are an encoding that can be stored, and rehydrated, then &ldquo;sent&rdquo; over a wire or waves, then can be decoded elsewhere, on another computer, where the bits are decoded, combined with a font described to transform them into electrical impulses that cause certain electrons to pulse in a crystal matrix (or an LED these days) so that they glow in the right shapes on a screen to be read and considered the &ldquo;article&rdquo; by my retinas, neurons, etc.—same as the original, although it&rsquo;s not. The original was a bunch of electrical signals in my head that I converted to encoded electrical impulses. Everything else is a copy, but they&rsquo;re no less &ldquo;real&rdquo; for all intents and purposes than the original. They&rsquo;re even more &ldquo;real&rdquo; since they&rsquo;re not nearly as ephemeral.</p>
<p>He leaves us with a message of hope, an analysis of things that have gone right in the Internet, that haven&rsquo;t been coopted by corporations and capitalism and the market principle. He uses Wikipedia as an example.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;I type the phrase &ldquo;Kuiper Belt&rdquo; as quickly as I can think it, as quickly as I can perceive the desire to absorb the facts of it, and no less quickly do the facts come pouring in from my screen. It is a dream come true, this cosmic window I am perched up again, this microcosmic sliver of all things.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 173</div></div><p>That is how I use the Internet as well, as a resource with which to learn and explore and document what I&rsquo;ve learned. I am as at one with my machine as the author. I tremble to think how I would even function intellectually, how I would provide value, if I didn&rsquo;t have the vast resource of the Internet—or even this web site into which I&rsquo;ve poured my mind for almost 25 years.<hr></p>
<p><hr></p>
<div class="footnote-reference"><span id="footnote_DRAFTABLE_ENTRY_4495_1_body" class="footnote-number">[1]</span> Disclaimer: these are notes I took while reading this book. They include citations I found interesting or enlightening or particularly well-written. In some cases, I&rsquo;ve pointed out which of these applies to which citation; in others, I have not. Any benefit you gain from reading these notes is purely incidental to the purpose they serve of reminding me of what I once read. Please see Wikipedia for a summary if I&rsquo;ve failed to provide one sufficient for your purposes. If my notes serve to trigger an interest in this book, then I&rsquo;m happy for you.</div><h2>Citations</h2><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;What happens with Leibniz is not the proper beginning of anything, but rather—a metaphor to which we will be returning frequently—it is the weaving together of several ideas into a filament thick enough to serve further on as a bright guiding thread through the rest of modern history up to the present day: the idea that natural language can be formalized; the idea that formal language can be processed by machines; the idea that human reason can be outsourced to these machines to make decisions for us; the idea that all things are interconnected&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 4</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;While strongly opposed to the “technicist mystification of personal consciousness under conditions of modern industrial civilization” and concerned to salvage “human dignity” under these conditions, I am likewise concerned to show that the greatest problem is not one of unstoppable technological determinism, or of a determinism that can only be countered by “flipping the off switch,” but rather in clarifying the nature of the force with which we are contending, and understanding the limits of thinking that proceeds by analogy between human beings and machines.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 6</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Animals are a tiny sliver of life on earth, yet they are preeminently what we mean when we talk about life on earth; social media are a tiny sliver of the internet, yet they are what we mean when we speak of the internet, as they are where the life is on the internet.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 8</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The principal charges against the internet, deserving of our attention here, instead have to do with the ways in which it has limited our potential and our capacity for thriving, the ways in which it has distorted our nature and fettered us. Let us enumerate them.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 9</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Private companies have thus moved in to take care of basic functions necessary for civil society, but without assuming any real responsibility to society. This, too, is a diminution of the political freedom of citizens of democracy, understood as the power to contribute to decisions concerning our social life and collective well-being. What Michael Walzer said of socialism might be said of democracy too: that “what touches all should be decided by all.” And on this reckoning, the internet is aggressively undemocratic.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 9</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;[…] by allowing the internet to compel us to attend to a constant stream of different, trivial things, we have become unable to focus on the monolithically important thing that it is.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 13</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;This is a revolution at least as massive as the agricultural and industrial revolutions that preceded it. Whatever else happens, it is safe to say that for the rest of all of our lifetimes, we will only be living out the initial turbulence of this entry into a new historical epoch.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 15</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The great engine that is fed upon countless little nibbles of individual human attention, and that must constantly solicit such attention if it is to get fed, runs much more effectively, and is much better able to indulge its voracious appetite, when it appeals to human passion than to human reason, when it entices our first-order desire for dopamine-fueled gratification, than when it invites us to cultivate moral character or pursue long-term goals of betterment of self or world.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 16</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;This then is the second new problem of the internet era: the way in which the emerging extractive economy threatens our ability to use our mental faculty of attention in a way that is conducive to human thriving.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 17</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;This then is the third feature of our current reality that constitutes a genuine break with the past: the condensation of so much of our lives into a single device, the passage of nearly all that we do through a single technological portal.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 18</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;It gets worse still. In Vladimir Nabokov’s 1957 novel Pnin, the titular character is a lost and hapless White Russian emigré teaching Slavic literature at a university with a striking resemblance to Cornell University. He boards in the home of an American family, the matron of which, Joan, enjoys sitting at the kitchen table with him as she reads the fat Sunday newspaper. When she asks why he will not take a section and read along with her, he replies, sadly: “You know I do not understand what is advertisement and what is not advertisement.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 18</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;But perhaps the greatest change over the past decades has been that individual readers or consumers are themselves now pushed and pressured to operate online according to the same commercial logic as the companies whose products they are using.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 19</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;But there is simply no other choice. You must use the internet in order to do anything at all, including writing and promoting books, and the more you use the internet, the more your individuality warps into a brand, and your subjectivity transforms into an algorithmically plottable vector of activity. Under these circumstances, one wants to say: “I do not even understand of myself what is advertisement and what is not advertisement.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 20</div></div><p>Think of a job search or the incessant hustle of daily life.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;[…] those individuals will thrive most, or believe themselves to thrive most, in this new system who are able convincingly to present themselves not as subjects at all, but as attention-grabbing sets of data points.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 20</div></div><p>This is how it always was, though, no? To others, to society, one is what one has to offer. Worth today is perhaps more crassly assigned to, or, perhaps more accurately, withheld from, individuals, than in the past, but it&rsquo;s not radically different. We are talking about a diminution of altruism, which was always a slippery concept.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Bots can do many things. They can monitor, track, harrass, impress with their ability to generate natural-seeming sentences, and even make jokes. But in the end they are like the cardboard-cow cutouts of a Potemkin village, as they are not themselves capable of conjuring that precious resource the new economy is intent on extracting: to wit, attention.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 21</div></div><p>Oh, but they can, at least to the crude measuring devices we use to glean information about attention. See <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=4305"><em>Automation and the Future of Work</em> by <em>Aaron Benanav</em></a></p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Researchers have found that the use of such dolls has significant effects in curing or reducing depression. It is not that the residents have been tricked, but only that having the dolls there was enough for them to encounter a simulation of empathy that allowed them to experience its positive effects.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 28</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;It has even become a common insult in some corners of the internet to denounce a person with whom you disagree as “a bot.” The implication is that their opinion is so crude that it may as well have been automatically generated. But to level such a denunciation is also a means of evading any threat of proper intersubjectivity, any obligation to display moral commitment to the other.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 29</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;The great difference, however, is that the books in Burton’s library, like the features of the natural world, invite sustained rather than flitting or fleeting attention, as do the features of the natural world, and there are long and venerable traditions that have sprung up to better enable people to cultivate this attention.</p>
<p>&ldquo;The internet, by contrast, seems to be structured so as positively to forbid such cultivation. This might be simply a condition of infancy. The great masterpieces of early cinema after all, such as the Lumière Brothers’s 1896 L’Arroseur arrosé [The Waterer Watered], lasted no more than a minute. Roughly seventy years later we had Andy Warhol’s Empire of 1964, more than eight hours long, which, if not a masterpiece, at least is an illustration that, among other things, the cinematic art may sometimes solicit us to undertake marathon exercises of attention that would have been inconceivable in the early years of the technology that made the new art possible.&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 31</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;In the future there may of course emerge forms of engagement with internet-mediated arts, and other expressions of the human creative and intellectual drive, that will require the sort of conscious commitment we now make when we begin reading a weighty novel.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 32</div></div><p>Somebody hasn&rsquo;t heard of video games. Eldar Ring anyone?</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;It is not that the technology of writing was unavailable to medieval scholars, but only that, for the most part, until the modern period true knowledge of an object of study involved internalizing that object by committing it to memory.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 33</div></div><p>Also argued in <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/app]view_article.php?id=4447"><em>Amusing Ourselves to Death</em> by <em>Neil Postman</em></a>.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;[…] what we tend to ignore in the wake of this shift is that without memorization, without commitment to memory of a body of knowledge by means of an art of memory, all we have left is a distal relationship to that body of knowledge, where it is retrievable from storage (whether in a book or a hard drive or in the “cloud”) should we need it, but which we cannot really be said to know until we retrieve it.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 33</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The feeling of loss of something profound and venerable, when we see that today young people spend hours on end scrolling through Instagram and do not seem to even consider the idea of picking up a book and reading it from cover to cover, echoes in important ways these earlier historical instances of loss.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 34</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;To properly attend to something, unlike being mindful of it, is to relinquish control of the meaning it holds for you, to allow it the potential to become something else, something unfamiliar within the context of your prior range of references and expectations.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 36</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;As this process continues, and I sink deeper into the work, I find that that world is not at all as it first appeared to me. It is not that I now think the narrator is “good” or “correct” or “praiseworthy,” whereas at the beginning the opposite appellations applied. It is that the moral commitment that I have taken on toward him, the commitment of attention, has infused his world into mine. Neither the novel nor the reader is any longer the same.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 37</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;To devise an artificial duck call or decoy is not to cheat at duck hunting, but is rather very much a part of duck hunting itself. Yet to become so reliant on such accessories as to lose the ability to attend to ducks, in their behavior, in their nature, is to leave off from the primordial experience of hunting and to begin doing something else altogether. At what point a gadget ceases to enhance and begins rather to distort or pervert, an activity, will differ for different people, and so it is always futile to attempt to distinguish between good and bad gadgets as such.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 39</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;If we agree with Leopold, the true end of duck hunting cannot simply be the accumulation of dead ducks, and so success in duck hunting cannot be determined by a simple consideration of the day’s yield, the “metrics” of the activity.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 39</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;In its current form it is as if we have had imposed on ourselves a gadget that does nothing more than count the number of ducks we have killed, broadcast that number to the entire world, rank us with that number alongside all other duck hunters, and invite all of them, as well as whatever interlopers feel so inclined, to praise, criticize, or mock us for our ranking.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 40</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;[…] bombarding anxious young scholars with spam-like messages pretending to inform them that “a senior scholar” has just downloaded their paper, that their work is being clicked in the top 1 percent on the site, and otherwise nudging them to continue to “build their brand”: these platforms are not enhancements of scholarship, but rather scholarship-themed games, bearing the same relationship to our work as thinkers that, say, Grand Theft Auto bears to driving stolen cars.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 41</div></div><p>You have to actively avoid the gamification aspects of DuoLingo to actually learn something. If I spend time on harder material, i earn fewer points and am punished with de-ranking. I wrote that when I read the book; in fairness, DuoLingo has improved considerably since then and is no longer very much like this.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;It is common, now, to read on the internet accounts of human action that model it on artificial systems and that have no other resources for conceiving human motivation than those borrowed from programming, even when what is at issue is human moral failure.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 42</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Corporations will manipulate people into behaving as if they were video-game players, and these same people will adopt an understanding of their own freely chosen pursuits in life as if life were a video game.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 45</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;[…] outsourcing our decision procedures is really only getting machines to run a simulacrum of thought, one that has everything our own thinking has, except perhaps for the subjectivity, the presence of a conscious mind behind the thinking.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 46</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Leibniz had anticipated that the more drudging and uninteresting operations of the mind might be outsourced to machines: they’ll do the math and the analysis of arguments, so that we might “think big,” contemplating ideas and synthesizing the results the machines give us into new and original arguments. What has in fact happened, it often appears, is that these drudging and uninteresting operations, as they are fed back to us, are being taken for the highest form of intellectual work possible, and are being used to model, and in turn to constrain, the way we understand our own minds and our own wills.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 46</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Leibniz thought we should parcel out to machines that part of our intellectual work that they can do, so that we might concentrate on that part that they cannot do. Now, instead, one may fear, we have perilously neglected this remainder, and while the machines were originally modeled after us, we now take what they can do as the ultimate form of intellectual work, and we emulate it, modeling ourselves after them.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 46</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;This is the beauty of popular music, and it is what gives the cultivation of aesthetic appreciation for it a distinct character, distinct especially from appreciation of classical music, where, however much subtle variation there may be from conductor to conductor, from performance to performance, nevertheless fidelity to the original intent of the composer is valued much more highly.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 47</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;If someone had to take a DNA test to learn that she was partially Irish in the first place, then there is simply no meaningful sense in which she has any more truly inborn receptivity to Celtic folk music than anyone else in the world. That is just not how music and culture work.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 48</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;[…] the shift to ubiquitous algorithmic management of society, which lends advantage to the expression of opinions unambigous enough (i.e., dogmatic or extremist enough) for AI to detect their meaning and to process them accordingly, and which also removes from the individual subject any deep existential imperative or moral duty to cultivate self-understanding,&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 49</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Social media are in this respect engines of perpetual disagreement, which sharpen opposing views into stark dichotomies and preclude the possibility of either exploring partial common ground or finding agreement in a dialectical fashion in some higher-order synthesis of what at the first order appear as contradictory positions.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 52</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;This leaves many people with a civic education built on realities from the previous century wondering what to do: people who feel the need to “speak up” but are deeply averse to unproductive dialogue, especially when it is being controlled by corporate interests that do not want it to be productive.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 53</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Civic education has long been based on the idea that public engagement is good, that it is part of our duty as citizens to read the news, to write letters to editors, to talk to people in our social circles about important issues of the day. But the news is now mostly a current within the ocean of social media.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 53</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;[…] what we are seeing for now is a sort of perversion of collective deliberation, as people, some of them with sincere good will, seek to use what is essentially a privately owned point-scoring video game as if it were the public sphere.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 54</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Twitter is the place where “socialists show contempt for hierarchy, meritocracy and neoliberal competition by competing for status in a game designed by a Silicon Valley overlord.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 54</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Every Tweet, no matter what its content, no matter whether true or false, righteous or trolling, adds to the tidal wave that is currently crashing over our public space and submerging our centuries-old aspiration toward a functioning deliberative democracy.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 55</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Isn’t it possible that the most recent outgrowths of our own species-specific telecommunicative activity—most notably, the internet, but also such systems as telegraphy and telephony, which we take to be extreme departures from the previous course of human history—are in fact something more like an outgrowth latent from the beginning in what we have always done, an ecologically unsurprising and predictable expression of something that was already there?&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 59</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;To some extent, telecommunication just is amplification: simply to speak to a person in a normal voice is already to telecommunicate, even if at naturally audible distances we have learned to be unimpressed by this most of the time.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 61</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;[…] anonymous pamphlet drawing on Digby’s work was published in London in 1688, proposing that a stabbed dog might be put on a ship moving across the Atlantic Ocean, while the dagger that stabbed the poor beast might be manipulated every day at the same time, causing the dog to howl in pain. And in this way the precise time at the place of departure could be determined, and from the angle of the sun and other measurements the lines of longitude could be demarcated, and a major navigational hurdle overcome.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 62</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Allix predicts that at some point it will be possible to make pocket-sized devices using particularly tiny species of snails, and that we will then be able to send messages throughout the day—“texts,” you might call them—to our friends and family as we go about the city. He envisions being able to receive newspapers from the whole world on these devices, and to follow the deliberations of parliament&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 64</div></div><p>In 1869, no less.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The story of Jules Allix reminds us that a rigorous historian of science may learn just as much from the fakes and frauds as from the genuine article: even when someone is lying, they are nonetheless doing the important work of imagining future possibilities.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 65</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;We tend to suppose that whatever is species-specific or essential to a given biological kind cannot ineliminably involve another species, that what it is to be a panther or an oak ought to be something that could be spelled out without implicating fleas or moss in the description. But the tendency to think this way is mostly our inheritance of an inadequate and un-ecological folk-metaphysics.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 68</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;And if we agree with the commonplace that a domestic pig or goat is an “artificial” being, to the extent that it is nature transformed in the pursuit of human ends, why should we not also agree that the algae farmed by fungus or the fungus enlisted by the tree to pass chemical messages and nutrient packets along its roots (much as the internet is said to facilitate “packet switching”): why should we not agree that this technique is technology too? Or, conversely, and perhaps somewhat more palatably for those who do not wish to rush to collapse the divide between the natural and the artificial: why should we not see our own technology as natural technique?&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 69</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The debate is, again, unresolved, for reasons that Kant could probably have anticipated. We can never fully know what it is like to be a duck, and so we cannot know whether what we are seeing in nature is a mere external appearance of what would be rape if it were occurring among humans, or whether it is truly, properly, duck rape.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 71</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;[…] our own sense of our specialness among creatures requires us to see the appearance of these behaviors in other species as mere appearance, as simulation, counterfeit, or aping.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 71</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Consequently, in recent years the internet has begun to occupy a position in human life previously reserved for such familiar necessities as food, shelter, and clean water. Yet we know that there was a time—many of us can even remember a time—when there could have been no claim to such a right, while by contrast we have always needed nutrition and hydration. So again, if telecommunication is simply a natural consequence of our species-specific activity, it would seem to be so in a different way than the signaling of sperm whales is among their kind, for evidently we have not always telecommunicated. Cetacean clicking in the ocean, and human clicking on the internet, are categorically different.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 73</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The French historian Serge Gruzinski intriguingly suggests that no question is more quintessentially modern than “What time is it where you are?,” as it requires a grasp of the simultaneity of different times in different places around the world, and also requires the power to reach across the divide between these places in order to communicate with an interlocutor at a geographical remove.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 75</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Even if Paleolithic people were not delivering letters across distances, it is certain that the seashell necklaces and other items we know they were delivering were perceived by their recipients to be packed with symbolic meaning, just like a letter, just like a sequence of emojis.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 77</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The first voice recording was made in the mid-nineteenth century, unless we count writing, in which case we must move the date back several millennia earlier. But writing, in turn, is what enabled people to fantasize about other forms of voice recording, such as the recording sponge, which fantasies in turn may well have played a causal role in the search for the technology that would eventually become the phonautograph or the mp3. In short, there are no firsts, and the past, as St. Augustine said, is always pregnant with the future.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 79</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;We sometimes revert to this way of thinking still today, when for example we look at a nighttime satellite image of the Korean peninsula, with the South blazing in artificial light and the North in near total darkness, and we imagine this to be a measure of the relative political enlightenment and social advancement of the two countries. But at the same time, and much more indicative of changes since White’s day, we also praise countries like Denmark and Finland for reducing energy consumption and for having the maturity and sense to turn off unneeded lights at night.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 80</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;It is not that there are cities and smartphones wherever there are human beings, but cities and smartphones themselves are only the concretions of a certain kind of natural activity in which human beings have been engaging all along.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 84</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The internet does not tell jokes; people tell jokes, and these only appear at some of the terminal points of the network, on the screens visited by attentive eyes possessed by conscious beings. It is only at these scattered points that aboutness enters into the network at all, and we may ask whether it is so much entering the network as rather extracting something from it and translating that extraction into a form of which the human mind can make good use.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 88</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;There is no quality of aboutness in the slime mold’s motions; it is not thinking about eating, or choosing to eat, any more than the iron bar is thinking about rusting or choosing to rust.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 88</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Although its supporters accuse its deniers of attachment to a premodern worldview, simulation theory itself has evident historical parallels to medieval angelology. Like the theologians of old, the new class of experts maintains that there are infinite hierarchies of celestial intelligences (though the terminology is of course adapted to contemporary sensibilities), of which only the wise have knowledge, while the foolish masses continue to suppose that earthly life is “reality.” Knowledge of the hidden truth becomes a sort of credential and confirmation of elite status.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 90</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Now, it is not certain that such deferential engagement can only be instantiated in a non-mechanical mind, and it is possible that if reckoning just keeps getting streamlined and quicker, eventually it will cross over into judgment. But mere possibility, as opposed to concrete evidence, is not a very strong foundation for speculation about the inevitable emergence of strong AI, that is, of AI that matches or surpasses human beings in its power of judgment.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 96</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;[…] there is no reason to think we are any closer to understanding how veraciously to simulate canine olfaction, say, than we are to simulating human emotional response to music or reflection on the similarities between love and certain species of flower.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 98</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Alongside the history of computer science narrowly understood, we should perhaps chart a parallel history, an imaginary museum of all the machines that only existed as fantasy, as rumor, as mere items on a wish list alongside so many other things that the alchemists and conjurers knew how to envision but had no idea how to bring about: perpetual motion machines, universal solvents, artificial life.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 104</div></div><p>Echoes of Umberto Eco.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Nobody can explain how—according to what laws of nature—machine-run programs are supposed to become conscious of their own activity, any more than they could explain the principles that would have made the Brazen Head work.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 105</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Since at least the seventeenth century, European observers have imagined Chinese people as being Chinese rooms, processing information and delivering rational and correct responses without any real conscious understanding of what they were doing; and China as a whole has been understood for equally long as a sort of “China brain,” functioning as a whole and as a true unity, rather than, in contrast with European nations, as a collection of individuals.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 109</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The Chinese are on this view, in effect, wise automata: doing everything rational agents do, but evidently without any true rationality grounding their action. They are like Descartes’s semblance of a man that moves about the street in a cloak and hat, and that so worried him in the second of his Meditations, but now multiplied to the size of a great nation. In sum, China and the specter of automation have long been two sides of the same coin in the history of European thought.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 109</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;We have no evidence that conscious experience emerges as a rule when computing power is increased. Correlatively, we have no evidence that the human brain is a computing device instantiated in a carbon-based material substratum but that might just as well have been instantiated in a silicon-based or dials-and-marbles-based one.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 111</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;A machine such as Vaucanson’s digesting duck (invented after Leibniz’s death, but certainly not beyond the bounds of conceivability during his lifetime) differs from a true duck in that the machine can be broken down in a short number of steps into parts that are not themselves machines, whereas in Leibniz’s view a duck’s or any other animal’s body remains a machine in its least parts ad infinitum.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 119</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The imminent arrival of strong AI is in many respects a neo-alchemist idea, of no more real interest in our efforts to understand the promises and threats of technology than any of the other forces medieval conjurers sought to awaken, and charlatans pretended to awaken, and chiliasts warned against awakening. Technology poses plenty of real existential threats to humanity and to life on earth. Automated technology in particular poses plenty of real threats to human thriving and to political equality and justice. Lucid scientists and risk analysts will address these threats undistracted by science fictions.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 121</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Social-media platforms like Facebook and Twitter are, in the end, video games, and so is LinkedIn, and so is ResearchGate.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 122</div></div><p>It all depends on how use LinkedIn or DuoLingo. For me, they are tools. However, it&rsquo;s clear that they are gamified and reward engagement. You have to work to ignore it. </p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The principal difference is that the destruction of the applied arts and crafts by industrialization began to make its effects felt generations before the (currently ongoing) destruction of the fine arts and the belles lettres by the automation of information-processing and “content” production.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 132</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The words we have been liberally quoting were written in French by an Italian scientist. But the translation here is not ours: the text was Englished by Augusta Ada King, Countess of Lovelace, and published in 1843. Though she is credited only as “A.A.L.” (and once, erroneously, as “A.L.L.”), Lovelace nonetheless inserts her own expert voice into the text in the form of lengthy endnotes, some of which elaborate considerably further on conceptual and technical matters than the author himself had done in the original French text.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 134</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;We have been returning again and again over the last chapters to the problem and the potential of metaphorical language: where its boundaries are, and what it has to offer us in our effort to understand the actual world in which we live.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 140</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;In fact, however, the history of science is often largely a history of metaphors. What is discovered as a new explanation or theoretical account of how the world works is, often, a new way to “carry over” (the etymological meaning of the word “metaphor”) from one domain habits or even fashions of thinking and understanding into another domain where these habits and fashions were not originally intended to go.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 140</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;It assumes too much, that is, to suppose that we already have a clear understanding of where the boundary between analogy and metaphor lies. And this is precisely our predicament when we attempt to comprehend computers, networked and otherwise, in their relationship to other things: to living nature, to human minds, or to looms.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 146</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Scientists license such metaphors, and science journalists run with them, shaping the way ordinary people understand the world around them. Thus a recent newspaper article describes galaxy clusters as being “connected by spidery filaments in what’s known as the cosmic web.”27 From the smallest to the largest scales, the stuff of this world is still said to be bound together by threads.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 148</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Thus a recent newspaper article describes galaxy clusters as being “connected by spidery filaments in what’s known as the cosmic web.” From the smallest to the largest scales, the stuff of this world is still said to be bound together by threads. The metaphor holds the fabric of our explanations together, at least when we move out of the pure mathematics that is in important respects the true language of theoretical physics,&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 148</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;To say that Burton “loved the world” is to say that he sought to include as much as he could on his imaginary stage, to give it order, and to allow it to matter to him. The result is a deeply personal, subjective, and often histrionic approach to science, whether of the human body, or the celestial bodies, or of anything else on which he feels inclined to digress. This is Burton’s “world,” and he knows it and loves it from within the security and comfort of his cramped and book-laden cell.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 154</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;This tour often tapers off imperceptibly into sleep, and the rhythm begins again the following day, which under this new regime of confinement will almost certainly be nearly identical to the day that preceded it. I am already fearing and mourning my eventual release back into the “world” in the vulgar sense: the bare physical reality of commutes, meetings, dinner parties, activities.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 155</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Twenty years ago I could easily have found myself sitting around doing nothing, when the question might suddenly come to me: “What is a quasar, anyway?” It is almost certain that at that time I would have quickly abandoned my curiosity, hoping perhaps that I might some day happen upon an answer, but not being quite interested enough, typically, to seek one out. Today it is second nature for me to immediately turn to Jimmy Wales’s infinite encyclopedia. The consequences of this reflexive habit for my general knowledge of the world are profound. I am convinced that I know vastly more than I would have had this resource not been available to me.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 156</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;As Jonathan Zittrain has observed, inverting the old line about Marxism, Wikipedia works well in practice, but not in theory. One of the keys to its success is that the openness of Wikipedia’s entries to editing, deletion, and expansion is not a free-for-all. There are at least minimal gatekeeping requirements, as well as the possibility of reversal of new edits by experienced editors, that help to avoid the sort of degeneration, signal loss, digression into irrelevance, and outright vandalism that are so common in comment threads and in public responses to media posts on Facebook and Twitter. The structure of Wikipedia’s gatekeeping procedures, combined perhaps with the very nature of the project, sustains something approaching a community spirit, a sincere and non-dogmatic concern to adhere to the truth.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 157</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;On most understandings of the ontology of a musical work, when we hear music streaming through Spotify or YouTube, we are hearing the music itself, and not just a representation of it. And much less or much more mysteriously (depending on your philosophical commitments), when we pay bills online, when we issue such speech acts as promises or threats via Facebook or Twitter, when we tell our loved ones we love them over Skype or Zoom, we are bringing about real transformations in the world, in our financial situation, in our social standing, in our hearts.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 164</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;To revive the philosopher of science Ian Hacking’s famous question in his article, “Do We See through a Microscope?” we may also ask: “Do we see through the internet?” And the most appropriate answer seems to be: “At least as much as we do through a microscope.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 165</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;There is a sense in reading about these latter things that if we come to be deeply interested in them, we must put down the books a some point and go have a look at the real thing, which, unlike the Kuiper Belt objects and the stars beyond them, we are in fact capable of studying up close. And yet the book is not simply a consolation for the inaccessibility of the thing that interests us. Sometimes it is a supplement, giving us a different sort of access to the thing that we might also study up close.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 167</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;On the Wikipedia page about avian crop milk, I click the link to the page about the <em>Symphysodon</em> genus, also knows as &ldquo;discus fish,&rdquo; some species of which &ldquo;nurse&rdquo; their young on a secretion through the skin that has molecular properties similar to milk. And, as I read, I begin to wonder: just what is milk anyhow? And how widely is it distributed throughout living nature? I I am not cautious, I will soon find myself reading about the Milky Way and the metaphors that fist associated this star system with milk, but I restrain myself and I think about animal secretions only, and even here, under these constraints, I am aware of a rising sensation in me of the sublime.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 167</div></div><p>That, to me, is the Internet: learning and exploring.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;When I type, the motion, the flow from my thoughts to the tips of my fingers through the keyboard and into the document on the screen, is as fluid and easy as if I were speaking. As I am typing at this very moment, I am not looking at the computer at all, but out the window at the leaves on the trees. That is how intimately I know my machine, and how natural it is for me to think and to produce traces of my thoughts by means of it. If we must find a seat for the soul, surely the tips of the fingers are as attractive a location for the noble role as any other.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 173</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;I type the phrase &ldquo;Kuiper Belt&rdquo; as quickly as I can think it, as quickly as I can perceive the desire to absorb the facts of it, and no less quickly do the facts come pouring in from my screen. It is a dream come true, this cosmic window I am perched up again, this microcosmic sliver of all things.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 173</div></div><h2>Errata</h2><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;processs&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 24</div></div><p><hr></p>
<div class="footnote-reference"><span id="footnote_DRAFTABLE_ENTRY_4495_2_body" class="footnote-number">[2]</span> I&rsquo;m making this a word I don&rsquo;t care.</div><div class="footnote-reference"><span id="footnote_DRAFTABLE_ENTRY_4495_3_body" class="footnote-number">[3]</span> At the time I read the book, I&rsquo;d only been working for <a href="https://www.uster.com/">Uster Technologies</a> for a few weeks.</div><div class="footnote-reference"><span id="footnote_DRAFTABLE_ENTRY_4495_4_body" class="footnote-number">[4]</span> Ghandi, when asked <span class="quote-inline">&ldquo;What do you think of western civilization?&rdquo;</span>, answered <span class="quote-inline">&ldquo;I think it would be a good idea.&rdquo;</span></div>      </div>
      </div>
        <div class="footer">
    <div class="footer-data"><div class="footer-links"><ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/contact.php" title="">Contact</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/support.php" title="">Support</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/privacy.php" title="">Privacy</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/rights.php" title="">Rights</a></li></ul></div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="copyright">Copyright (c) 1999-2026 earthli.com. All Rights Reserved.</div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="versions">Powered by <ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore/app_news.php">earthli News 3.7</a></li><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore" title="">earthli WebCore&trade; 3.7</a></li></ul></div></div>    </div>
      </div>
  </div>  </body>
</html>
]]>
  </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
      <title type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[No One Is Talking About This by Patricia Lockwood (2021) (read in 2022)]]>
  </title>
    <id>https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=4491</id>
    <link href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=4491"/>
    <updated>2023-01-18T21:28:47+01:00</updated>
    <author>
        <name type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[Marco von Ballmoos]]>
  </name>
      <uri>https://earthli.com/users/marco</uri>
    </author>
      <summary type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<p><small class="notes">Standard disclaimer [1]</small></p>
<p><a href="https://www.earthli.com/data/news/attachments/entry/4491/nooneistalkingaboutthisbookcover.jpeg"><img src="https://www.earthli.com/data/news/attachments/entry/4491/nooneistalkingaboutthisbookcover_tn.jpeg" alt=" " class=" align-right"></a>Lockwood has a great feel for using a modern, hip vernacular to describe this world of ours. Her styles feels a bit like Gibson, with his similar penchant for emphasizing cultural relevance with product placement.</p>
<p>The first half of the book is about the &ldquo;portal&rdquo;, a kind of... [<a class="complete-text-link" href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=4491">More</a>]</p>
]]>
  </summary>
      <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<html lang="en">
  <head>
    <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/themes/ice.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/fonts/raleway.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/core/medium.css">
  </head>
  <body>
<div class="style-controls">  <div class="page">
    <div class="page-body">
<div class="info-box-top">
<p>
Published by <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_user.php?name=marco" title="Marco von Ballmoos" class="visible">marco</a> on <span class="date-time">18. Jan 2023 21:28:47 (GMT-5)</span>
</p>
</div>
      <div class="text-flow wide">
  <p><small class="notes">Standard disclaimer [1]</small></p>
<p><a href="https://www.earthli.com/data/news/attachments/entry/4491/nooneistalkingaboutthisbookcover.jpeg"><img src="https://www.earthli.com/data/news/attachments/entry/4491/nooneistalkingaboutthisbookcover_tn.jpeg" alt=" " class=" align-right"></a>Lockwood has a great feel for using a modern, hip vernacular to describe this world of ours. Her styles feels a bit like Gibson, with his similar penchant for emphasizing cultural relevance with product placement.</p>
<p>The first half of the book is about the &ldquo;portal&rdquo;, a kind of stream-of-consciousness brain-dump about what it&rsquo;s like to live on the Internet and simultaneously in the modern world as a privileged first-worlder. She&rsquo;s not even shy about comparing herself to a specific lofty forbear,</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;When she walked through the gates of Saint Stephen’s Green the new book, the communal stream-of-consciousness, began to flow toward the rigid bust of Joyce.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 48</div></div><p>Instead of restricting herself to a single city, as Joyce did with Dublin, she took on the whole world. It&rsquo;s not exactly a failed attempt and holds up relatively well, filled with interesting snatches and snippets from that stream. That&rsquo;s not a dig: the first half of the book is very clearly an absolute pastiche of thoughts that are at most a single page. It&rsquo;s better than a Twitter stream by far, but it has the same kind of staccato, fragmented feel.</p>
<p>The stream about the portal is mostly an explanation of what the hell is going on, but in a tone that&rsquo;s vaguely disapproving, as of a person who&rsquo;s been through the shit and seen it for what it is. That is, while they were going through it, it was the most important thing in the world but, afterwards, they were able to gain a distance from it and see if for what it was: overall, a waste of time and, possibly, actively deleterious to themselves and pretty much everyone else.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;It was a mistake to believe that other people were not living as deeply as you were. Besides, you were not even living that deeply.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 7</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Every day their attention must turn, like the shine on a school of fish, all at once, toward a new person to hate. Sometimes the subject was a war criminal, but other times it was someone who made a heinous substitution in guacamole.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 9</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;She had become famous for a post that said simply, Can a dog be twins? That was it. Can a dog be twins? It had recently reached the stage of penetration where teens posted the cry-face emoji at her. They were in high school. They were going to remember “Can a dog be twins?” instead of the date of the Treaty of Versailles, which, let’s face it, she didn’t know either.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 13</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;She hoped the twenty-four online IQ tests she had taken were wrong. They had to be.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 83</div></div><p>This book reveals a glimpse into what it was like to mature online, in the portal, aware enough to note the inconsistency of information, the superficiality of supposed wisdom, but not to resist the wiles and subjugation, the seemingly inevitable dilution of experience to the minimum required for ensuring exchange of meager wealth for sustenance. The machine optimizes until no-one is happy, but no-one can leave.</p>
<p>Where the first part of the book is about the hyperactive superficiality and shallowness of online life, the second half of the book is autobiographical. It&rsquo;s about her sister&rsquo;s baby, who&rsquo;s born with a debilitating disease that serious impacts her ability to interact with the world and also to stay in it. Her family rallies around the little life as if it were the most important thing in the world—because, to them, she is. In a way, the penchant for superficiality, for focusing on details, is the same, but this time it&rsquo;s landed on protecting a little life&rsquo;s ability to experience the world, even given the paucity of sensory equipment with which she was born.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;How she wished she had never read that article about octopus intelligence, because now every time she sliced into a charred tentacle among blameless new potatoes she thought to herself, I am eating a mind, I am eating a mind, I am eating a fine grasp of the subject at hand.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 143</div></div><p>This experience makes her less cynical, less world-weary, more likely to believe in people&rsquo;s having reasons for being the way that they are. It leaves more room for empathy.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;A photo of a hot actor in a 2014 staging of The Elephant Man, in which he played the main role without prosthetics, just by twisting his torso and making a weird face. This was the test, she thought to herself, and waited to feel either hilarity or outrage. Neither came. He looks like he’s doing a pretty good job, she decided finally. I bet his mom is proud of him, which is what she thought about most people she encountered these days.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 162</div></div><p>She&rsquo;s healing.</p>
<p>She remembers having epiphanies that she never has anymore. That they fade with time is inexorable chemistry, but I can still remember having had them. I can still remember where I was when I had a couple of them. I remember the last one.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Someone had sat them on little stools in their display cases, so they would not get tired—of what?—of the long direct daylight of being Beanie Babies. Someone had cared for them. Perhaps everyone was a god with their eye on some small sparrow. Perhaps everyone was the collector of some soft rare commemorative, stitched with a visible heart and worth millions on millions in the mind.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 200</div></div><p>This is how you see the world when you&rsquo;ve lost someone. You realize everyone has someone. There are unknown and untold stories around every corner.</p>
<p>This, too, is how one thinks when one has had something wonderful and it has come to an end before you. You appreciate more how everyone is seeking comfort and security and happiness and peace, and you want it to last forever. When you have it good, simple—why change?</p>
<p>The first part is entertaining and full of delightful writing. The second is sweet and insightful and also full of delightful writing. I don&rsquo;t know that I&rsquo;ll read more of Lockwood, but I&rsquo;m glad I read this one.</p>
<p><hr></p>
<div class="footnote-reference"><span id="footnote_DRAFTABLE_ENTRY_4491_1_body" class="footnote-number">[1]</span> Disclaimer: these are notes I took while reading this book. They include citations I found interesting or enlightening or particularly well-written. In some cases, I&rsquo;ve pointed out which of these applies to which citation; in others, I have not. Any benefit you gain from reading these notes is purely incidental to the purpose they serve of reminding me of what I once read. Please see Wikipedia for a summary if I&rsquo;ve failed to provide one sufficient for your purposes. If my notes serve to trigger an interest in this book, then I&rsquo;m happy for you.</div><h2>Citations</h2><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;Where had the old tyranny gone, the tyranny of husband over wife? She suspected most of it had been channeled into weird ideas about supplements, whether or not vinyl sounded “warmer,” and which coffeemakers were nothing but a shit in the mouth of the coffee christ.</p>
<p>&ldquo;“A hundred years ago you would have been mining coal and had fourteen children all named Jane,” she often marveled, as she watched a man stab a finger at his wife in front of the Keurig display.</p>
<p>&ldquo;“Two hundred years ago, you might have been in a coffee shop in Göttingen, shaking the daily paper, hashing out the questions of the day—and I would be shaking out sheets from the windows, not knowing how to read.” But didn’t tyranny always feel like the hand of the way things were?&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 6</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;It was a mistake to believe that other people were not living as deeply as you were. Besides, you were not even living that deeply.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 7</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Other people’s diaries streamed around her. Should she be listening, for instance, to the conversations of teenagers? Should she follow with such avidity the compliments that rural sheriffs paid to porn stars, not realizing that other people could see them?&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 7</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;[…] where she would distill the whole sunset cloud of human feeling to a six-word lyric.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 8</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Every day their attention must turn, like the shine on a school of fish, all at once, toward a new person to hate. Sometimes the subject was a war criminal, but other times it was someone who made a heinous substitution in guacamole.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 9</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;She had become famous for a post that said simply, Can a dog be twins? That was it. Can a dog be twins? It had recently reached the stage of penetration where teens posted the cry-face emoji at her. They were in high school. They were going to remember “Can a dog be twins?” instead of the date of the Treaty of Versailles, which, let’s face it, she didn’t know either.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 13</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Previously these communities were imposed on us, along with their mental weather. Now we chose them—or believed that we did. A person might join a site to look at pictures of her nephew and five years later believe in a flat earth.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 24</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;You found the candida overgrowth board, glowing its welcome along the highway of sleeplessness, and stepped through the swinging doors, which immediately shut fast behind you.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 28</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Your behavior was subtly modified against humiliations, chastisements, censures you might receive on the candida overgrowth board. You anticipated arguments against you and played them out in the shower while you were soaping your hair,&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 28</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Someone was dead, she had never met him, yet she had zoomed in on the texture of his injuries a dozen times, as she might squint at the pink of a sunset she was too lazy to meet outside. And that is what it was like.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 30</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;When she walked through the gates of Saint Stephen’s Green the new book, the communal stream-of-consciousness, began to flow toward the rigid bust of Joyce.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 48</div></div><p>Ah, that&rsquo;s what she thinks she&rsquo;s writing. Except, instead of Dublin, she&rsquo;s all over the world, thinking about Trump and Twitter.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The unabomber had been right about everything! Well . . . not everything. The unabomber stuff he had gotten wrong. But that stuff about the Industrial Revolution had been right on the money.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 55</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;A reporter had once asked the unabomber if he was afraid of losing his mind in prison.</p>
<p>&ldquo;“No, what worries me is that I might in a sense adapt to this environment and come to be comfortable here and not resent it anymore. And I am afraid that as the years go by that I may forget, I may begin to lose my memories of the mountains and the woods and that’s what really worries me, that I might lose those memories, and lose that sense of contact with wild nature in general.”&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 56</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Even a spate of sternly worded articles called “Guess What: Tech Has an Ethics Problem” was not making tech have less of an ethics problem. Oh man. If that wasn’t doing it, what would??&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 64</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;We reveled in these stories, which were not untrue. But there was some untruth in the degree to which they comforted us.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 70</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;It had also once been the place where you sounded like yourself. Gradually it had become the place where we sounded like each other, through some erosion of wind or water on a self not nearly as firm as stone.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 72</div></div><p>This book reveals a glimpse into what it was like to mature online, in the portal, aware enough to note the inconsistency of information, the superficiality of supposed wisdom, but not to resist the wiles and subjugation, the seemingly inevitable dilution of experience to the minimum required for ensuring exchange of meager wealth for sustenance. The machines optimizes until no-one is happy, but no-one can leave.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The difference between her and her sister could be attributed to the fact that she came of age in the nineties, during the heyday of plaid and heroin, while her sister came of age in the 2000s, during the heyday of thongs and cocaine. That was when everything got a little chihuahua and started starring in its own show. That was when we saw the whole world’s waxed pussy getting out of a car, and said, more.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 76</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;She hoped the twenty-four online IQ tests she had taken were wrong. They had to be.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 83</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;“I don’t think you’re a pervert at all, Sam. If you were a member of my generation you would cum in a special jar over a period of months and then post pictures of the jar online. A foot fetish . . .” She took a deep breath. “A foot fetish is like a beautiful meadow in comparison. A foot fetish is Pachelbel’s Canon.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 89</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;But how strange, she had thought, biting into a slice of bread-and-butter that tasted like sunshine in green fields, to live in a country where someone can say “the massacre” and you don’t have to ask which one.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 92</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;We took the things we found in the portal as much for granted as if they had grown there, gathered them as God’s own flowers. When we learned that they had been planted there on purpose by people who understood them to be poisonous, who were pointing their poison at us, well.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 92</div></div><p>Oh, very nice indeed</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;“Surely there must be exceptions,” her father ventured, the man who had spent his entire existence crusading against the exception. His white-hairy hand traveled to his belt, the way it always did when he was afraid. He did not want to live in the world he had made, but when it came right down to it, did any of us?&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 133</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;All the worries about what a mind was fell away as soon as the baby was placed in her arms. A mind was merely something trying to make it in the world. The baby, like a soft pink machete, swung and chopped her way through the living leaves. A path was a path was a path was a path. A path was a person and a path was a mind, walk, chop, walk, chop.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 143</div></div><p>A little bit of Burroughs there</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;How she wished she had never read that article about octopus intelligence, because now every time she sliced into a charred tentacle among blameless new potatoes she thought to herself, I am eating a mind, I am eating a mind, I am eating a fine grasp of the subject at hand.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 143</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;On the television in the NICU waiting room, a report that the dictator had finally gone too far. The next day, on the television in the NICU waiting room, a report that no he hadn’t, and in fact that it was no longer possible to go too far.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 152</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;A photo of a hot actor in a 2014 staging of The Elephant Man, in which he played the main role without prosthetics, just by twisting his torso and making a weird face. This was the test, she thought to herself, and waited to feel either hilarity or outrage. Neither came. He looks like he’s doing a pretty good job, she decided finally. I bet his mom is proud of him, which is what she thought about most people she encountered these days.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 162</div></div><p>You&rsquo;re healing.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;“A minute means something to her, more than it means to us. We don’t know how long she has—I can give them to her, I can give her my minutes.”</p>
<p>&ldquo;Then, almost angrily, “What was I doing with them before?”&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 171</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Would it change her? Back in her childhood she used to have holy feelings, knifelike flashes that laid the earth open like a blue watermelon, when the sun came down to her like an elevator she was sure she could step inside and be lifted up, up, past all bad luck, past every skipped thirteenth floor in every building human beings had ever built. She would have these holy days and walk home from school and think, After this I will be able to be nice to my mother, but she never ever was. After this I will be able to talk only about what matters, life and death and what comes after, but still she went on about the weather.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 196</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The doors of bland suburban houses now looked possible, outlined, pulsing—for behind any one of them could be hidden a bright and private glory. The woman who had once been called the voice of God, who had been absent from the stage for two decades, went on singing in her own home, her partner heard her. He felt sorry for the rest of the world, he said. “I just had a lot of something—what was it?” the singer had once told an interviewer. “So much sun, I suppose, running through me. All this wonderful sun!” The doors of suburban houses might be shut up on that sun.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 197</div></div><p>Those are epiphanies. They fade with time. I remember them, though.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Someone had sat them on little stools in their display cases, so they would not get tired—of what?—of the long direct daylight of being Beanie Babies. Someone had cared for them. Perhaps everyone was a god with their eye on some small sparrow. Perhaps everyone was the collector of some soft rare commemorative, stitched with a visible heart and worth millions on millions in the mind.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 200</div></div><p>This is how you see the world when you&rsquo;ve lost someone. You realize everyone has someone. There are unknown and untold stories around every corner.</p>
<p>This, too, is how one thinks when one has had something wonderful and it has come to an end before you. You appreciate more how everyone is seeking comfort and security and happiness and peace, and wants it to last forever. When you have it good, simple, why change?<br>
&nbsp;</p>
      </div>
      </div>
        <div class="footer">
    <div class="footer-data"><div class="footer-links"><ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/contact.php" title="">Contact</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/support.php" title="">Support</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/privacy.php" title="">Privacy</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/rights.php" title="">Rights</a></li></ul></div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="copyright">Copyright (c) 1999-2026 earthli.com. All Rights Reserved.</div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="versions">Powered by <ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore/app_news.php">earthli News 3.7</a></li><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore" title="">earthli WebCore&trade; 3.7</a></li></ul></div></div>    </div>
      </div>
  </div>  </body>
</html>
]]>
  </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
      <title type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[Amusing Ourselves to Death by Neil Postman (1984) (read in 2021)]]>
  </title>
    <id>https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=4447</id>
    <link href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=4447"/>
    <updated>2023-01-17T21:58:17+01:00</updated>
    <author>
        <name type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[Marco von Ballmoos]]>
  </name>
      <uri>https://earthli.com/users/marco</uri>
    </author>
      <summary type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<p><small class="notes">Standard disclaimer [1]</small></p>
<p><a href="https://www.earthli.com/data/news/attachments/entry/4447/amusingourselvestodeath.jpg"><img src="https://www.earthli.com/data/news/attachments/entry/4447/amusingourselvestodeath_tn.jpg" alt=" " class=" align-right"></a>This book explores the thesis that printed material is the sweet spot for delivering information to human beings. The move in the mid-twentieth century to audiovisual presentation is a step in the wrong direction. The medium of television transforms everything it touches into... [<a class="complete-text-link" href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=4447">More</a>]</p>
]]>
  </summary>
      <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<html lang="en">
  <head>
    <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/themes/ice.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/fonts/raleway.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/core/medium.css">
  </head>
  <body>
<div class="style-controls">  <div class="page">
    <div class="page-body">
<div class="info-box-top">
<p>
Published by <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_user.php?name=marco" title="Marco von Ballmoos" class="visible">marco</a> on <span class="date-time">17. Jan 2023 21:58:17 (GMT-5)</span>
</p>
</div>
      <div class="text-flow wide">
  <p><small class="notes">Standard disclaimer [1]</small></p>
<p><a href="https://www.earthli.com/data/news/attachments/entry/4447/amusingourselvestodeath.jpg"><img src="https://www.earthli.com/data/news/attachments/entry/4447/amusingourselvestodeath_tn.jpg" alt=" " class=" align-right"></a>This book explores the thesis that printed material is the sweet spot for delivering information to human beings. The move in the mid-twentieth century to audiovisual presentation is a step in the wrong direction. The medium of television transforms everything it touches into entertainment. The book was written in 1985 and deals with the hole punched in culture by television.</p>
<p>Thirty-seven years later, the direness of the situation has been turned up several notches, with the advent of the kind of Internet that we of course ended up with, thanks to our mad form of capitalism that absorbs everything it touches. The state of information is more insane, incomprehensible, and superficial than ever.</p>
<p>It is a world where ignorance is bliss. The less you understand of the firehose of information and propaganda fired at you, the better.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;In watching American television, one is reminded of George Bernard Shaw’s remark on his first seeing the glittering neon signs of Broadway and 42nd Street at night. It must be beautiful, he said, if you cannot read.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 86</div></div><p>It&rsquo;s like when I have to suffer through Britney Spears because I understand the lyrics, but I can enjoy similarly catchy pop music in a foreign language. You&rsquo;re able to appreciate the rhythm and melody without being distracted by the largely insipid content.</p>
<p>He laments the loss of the primacy of radio, which he considers to have been superior to television because it doesn&rsquo;t have the seductive visual component.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;No one turns on radio anymore for soap operas or a presidential address (if a television set is at hand). But everyone goes to television for all these things and more, which is why television resonates so powerfully throughout the culture.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 92</div></div><p>But radio these days has been completely destroyed by the same capitalism that&rsquo;s to blame for the grip that television once had everyone&rsquo;s attention. Clear Channel owns everything, the whole business is a cartel, and there is no room for anything like useful information.</p>
<p>The Internet has definitely made space for all kinds online to get exposure. In that sense, communication has been democratized. Even the ugly find audiences because they are allowed to search without being a priori filtered out. Podcasts and audio books are very popular now, as well. Although it’s unclear what percentage they are relative to TikTok (probably super-low; no-one reads anymore). Even popular SubStacks now offer “listen to this article”.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;It is simply not possible to convey a sense of seriousness about any event if its implications are exhausted in less than one minute’s time. In fact, it is quite obvious that TV news has no intention of suggesting that any story has any implications, for that would require viewers to continue to think about it when it is done and therefore obstruct their attending to the next story that waits panting in the wings.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 103</div></div><p>Whereas the media used to avoid lingering too long, it&rsquo;s now changed quite a bit. With the advent of 24h news (something Postman didn&rsquo;t foresee at all), they now belabor a story to death. Also, now, we have the ability to pause and replay and reflect. If we take this opportunity, then we can use television for our own purposes, rather than be used by it. Most don&rsquo;t, though.</p>
<p>The following, though, is an example of Postman putting too much faith into what he thinks are reliable news sources. It&rsquo;s always been bullshit propaganda, but he tries very hard to make it look more serious than it had any right to be treated.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The viewers also know that no matter how grave any fragment of news may appear (for example, on the day I write a Marine Corps general has declared that nuclear war between the United States and Russia is inevitable) […]&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 104</div></div><p>That&rsquo;s not news, that&rsquo;s hearsay. He&rsquo;s confusing gravity for truth. If people ignore it, it might be not that they don&rsquo;t care, but that they know that official sources are horseshit. I feel that his thesis is sound, but that his examples are superficial and lacking in conclusiveness, which gravely undermines the thesis, if those are the only examples he can come up with.</p>
<p>A little while later, he has a decidedly staid take on the gravity of news—seeming to imply that every tragic tale we hear should be taken seriously, when the media dredge up one tale of woe after another to manipulate our empathy.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;In watching television news, they, more than any other segment of the audience, are drawn into an epistemology based on the assumption that all reports of cruelty and death are greatly exaggerated and, in any case, not to be taken seriously or responded to sanely.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 105</div></div><p>Perhaps, in Postman&rsquo;s time, there was a lot less of this manipulation, but nowadays it&rsquo;s become the main form of content. To ignore it is the correct response. Television news is useless as a source of fact. That&rsquo;s not what it&rsquo;s for. There&rsquo;s no need to lament it. People don&rsquo;t really want to be informed, they certainly don&rsquo;t want to read. I don&rsquo;t think he examines enough <em>why</em> things are this way, that people had to be trained to stop caring about anything that matters, had to be trained to think that what&rsquo;s doesn&rsquo;t matter <em>does</em>.</p>
<p>He never quite gets around to addressing the corruptive influence of capitalism and market forces on information-dissemination to an informed public.</p>
<p>He also seems to be misled by the reporters who blame their lack of coverage on their listeners, when it is they who determine what people want, or at least their bosses. Cart before the horse. Maybe the NYT was different then, but this sounds suspiciously exactly like the same shit they pull today.</p>
<p>He&rsquo;s also unfortunately quite condescending to the people that he claims to be trying to save—his fellow Americans.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Today, on television commercials, propositions are as scarce as unattractive people. The truth or falsity of an advertiser’s claim is simply not an issue. A McDonald’s commercial, for example, is not a series of testable, logically ordered assertions. It is a drama—a mythology, if you will—of handsome people selling, buying and eating hamburgers, and being driven to near ecstasy by their good fortune.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 127</div></div><p>Part of this is also that commercials aim to separate a large group of people from their disposable income. That group didn&rsquo;t used to be as large as it is now. Nor did we hear about them all the time. We hear about fools buying NFTs of sneakers as if we could be them. We travel in very different circles from the other 95%.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;As I write, the trend in call-in shows is for the “host” to insult callers whose language does not, in itself, go much beyond humanoid grunting. Such programs have little content, as this word used to be defined, and are merely of archeological interest in that they give us a sense of what a dialogue among Neanderthals might have been like.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 112</div></div><p>This sounds more like the precursor to today&rsquo;s liberal snobbery than reasoned criticism. Compare again to someone like Chris Hedges, who does not descend to this ad-hominem level. He doesn&rsquo;t stop there with his disdain of the hoi polloi. In another example, he mocks the obsession with “trivia”, as in the rise of the game of Trivial Pursuit. This is pretty arrogant horseshit. I think he’s taking it a bit too far. He sounds like a giant fucking stick in the mud who has carefully avoided learning ephemera but also interacting with people. To what end?</p>
<p>In the end, the author sounds very conservative, almost reactionary. He has no sense of humor and doesn’t see at all how levity can mix with serious information. He would have hated Bill Hicks, who was a poet of incisive commentary. Hicks said with a few words what a bloviator would say with pages.</p>
<p>I personally think think that part of this guy’s inspiration was that he was mad that no-one thought he was funny. His attempts at humor are so dry that they’ve been wrung completely free of wit. Chris Hedges wrote the foreword to Lee Camp’s book. That strikes a better balance.</p>
<p><hr></p>
<div class="footnote-reference"><span id="footnote_DRAFTABLE_ENTRY_4447_1_body" class="footnote-number">[1]</span> Disclaimer: these are notes I took while reading this book. They include citations I found interesting or enlightening or particularly well-written. In some cases, I&rsquo;ve pointed out which of these applies to which citation; in others, I have not. Any benefit you gain from reading these notes is purely incidental to the purpose they serve of reminding me of what I once read. Please see Wikipedia for a summary if I&rsquo;ve failed to provide one sufficient for your purposes. If my notes serve to trigger an interest in this book, then I&rsquo;m happy for you.</div><h2>Citations</h2><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Today’s eighteen-to-twenty-two-year-olds live in a vastly different media environment from the one that existed in 1985. Their relationship to TV differs. Back then, MTV was in its late infancy. Today, news scrolls and corner-of-the-screen promos and “reality” shows and infomercials and nine hundred channels are the norm. And TV no longer dominates the media landscape.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 93-96</div></div><p>And fifteen years later, it&rsquo;s all been turned up a notch, more insane, incomprehensible, and superficial than ever.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;“Screen time” also means hours spent in front of the computer, video monitor, cell phone, and handheld. Multitasking is standard. Communities have been replaced by demographics. Silence has been replaced by background noise. It’s a different world.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 96-98</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Maria noted that the oversimplification and thinking “fragmentation” promoted by TV-watching may have contributed to our Red State/ Blue State polarization.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 115-116</div></div><p>Even worse fifteen years later.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;His questions can be asked about all technologies and media. What happens to us when we become infatuated with and then seduced by them? Do they free us or imprison us? Do they improve or degrade democracy? Do they make our leaders more accountable or less so? Our system more transparent or less so? Do they make us better citizens or better consumers? Are the trade-offs worth it?&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 186-189</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;We were keeping our eye on 1984. When the year came and the prophecy didn’t, thoughtful Americans sang softly in praise of themselves. The roots of liberal democracy had held. Wherever else the terror had happened, we, at least, had not been visited by Orwellian nightmares.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 225-227</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Huxley feared we would become a trivial culture, preoccupied with some equivalent of the feelies, the orgy porgy, and the centrifugal bumblepuppy. As Huxley remarked in Brave New World Revisited, the civil libertarians and rationalists who are ever on the alert to oppose tyranny “failed to take into account man’s almost infinite appetite for distractions.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 235-237</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;It is an argument that fixes its attention on the forms of human conversation, and postulates that how we are obliged to conduct such conversations will have the strongest possible influence on what ideas we can conveniently express. And what ideas are convenient to express inevitably become the important content of a culture.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 6</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;A person who reads a book or who watches television or who glances at his watch is not usually interested in how his mind is organized and controlled by these events, still less in what idea of the world is suggested by a book, television, or a watch.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 11</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;[…] the clock introduced a new form of conversation between man and God, in which God appears to have been the loser. Perhaps Moses should have included another Commandment: Thou shalt not make mechanical representations of time.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 12</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;We do not see nature or intelligence or human motivation or ideology as “it” is but only as our languages are. And our languages are our media. Our media are our metaphors. Our metaphors create the content of our culture.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 15</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;I mean only to call attention to the fact that there is a certain measure of arbitrariness in the forms that truth-telling may take. We must remember that Galileo merely said that the language of nature is written in mathematics. He did not say everything is. And even the truth about nature need not be expressed in mathematics. For most of human history, the language of nature has been the language of myth and ritual.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 24</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;In saying this, I am not making a case for epistemological relativism. Some ways of truth-telling are better than others, and therefore have a healthier influence on the cultures that adopt them. Indeed, I hope to persuade you that the decline of a print-based epistemology and the accompanying rise of a television-based epistemology has had grave consequences for public life, that we are getting sillier by the minute.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 24</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;In a print culture, the memorization of a poem, a menu, a law or most anything else is merely charming. It is almost always functionally irrelevant and certainly not considered a sign of high intelligence.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 25</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;My argument is limited to saying that a major new medium changes the structure of discourse; it does so by encouraging certain uses of the intellect, by favoring certain definitions of intelligence and wisdom, and by demanding a certain kind of content—in a phrase, by creating new forms of truth-telling. I will say once again that I am no relativist in this matter, and that I believe the epistemology created by television not only is inferior to a print-based epistemology but is dangerous and absurdist.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 27</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;I will try to demonstrate that as typography moves to the periphery of our culture and television takes its place at the center, the seriousness, clarity and, above all, value of public discourse dangerously declines. On what benefits may come from other directions, one must keep an open mind.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 29</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The Dunkers came close here to formulating a commandment about religious discourse : Thou shalt not write down thy principles, still less print them, lest thou shall be entrapped by them for all time.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 31</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Among the few who understood this consequence was Henry David Thoreau, who remarked in Walden that “We are in great haste to construct a magnetic telegraph from Maine to Texas; but Maine and Texas, it may be, have nothing important to communicate…. We are eager to tunnel under the Atlantic and bring the old world some weeks nearer to the new; but perchance the first news that will leak through into the broad flapping American ear will be that Princess Adelaide has the whooping cough.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 65</div></div><p>Omg he gets it. He gets Twitter.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The telegraph may have made the country into “one neighborhood,” but it was a peculiar one, populated by strangers who knew nothing but the most superficial facts about each other.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 67</div></div><p>Plus ça change, plus c&rsquo;est la meme chose.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The last refuge is, of course, giving your opinion to a pollster, who will get a version of it through a desiccated question, and then will submerge it in a Niagara of similar opinions, and convert them into—what else?—another piece of news. Thus, we have here a great loop of impotence: The news elicits from you a variety of opinions about which you can do nothing except to offer them as more news, about which you can do nothing.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 69</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;You will, in fact, have “learned” nothing (except perhaps to avoid strangers with photographs), and the illyx will fade from your mental landscape as though it had never been. At best you are left with an amusing bit of trivia, good for trading in cocktail party chatter or solving a crossword puzzle, but nothing more.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 75</div></div><p>This is pretty arrogant horseshit. I think he&rsquo;s taking it a bit too far. He sounds like a giant fucking stick in the mud who has carefully avoided learning ephemera but also interacting with people. To what end?</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Our culture’s adjustment to the epistemology of television is by now all but complete; we have so thoroughly accepted its definitions of truth, knowledge, and reality that irrelevance seems to us to be filled with import, and incoherence seems eminently sane.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 80</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;What is television? What kinds of conversations does it permit? What are the intellectual tendencies it encourages? What sort of culture does it produce?&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 84</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;In watching American television, one is reminded of George Bernard Shaw’s remark on his first seeing the glittering neon signs of Broadway and 42nd Street at night. It must be beautiful, he said, if you cannot read.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 86</div></div><p>It&rsquo;s like hearing Britney Spears or other pop music in a foreign language. You&rsquo;re able to appreciate the rhythm and melody without being distracted by the largely insipid content.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;what I am claiming here is not that television is entertaining but that it has made entertainment itself the natural format for the representation of all experience. Our television set keeps us in constant communion with the world, but it does so with a face whose smiling countenance is unalterable. The problem is not that television presents us with entertaining subject matter but that all subject matter is presented as entertaining, which is another issue altogether.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 87</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;When a television show is in process, it is very nearly impermissible to say, “Let me think about that” or “I don’t know” or “What do you mean when you say … ?” or “From what sources does your information come?” This type of discourse not only slows down the tempo of the show but creates the impression of uncertainty or lack of finish. It tends to reveal people in the act of thinking, which is as disconcerting and boring on television as it is on a Las Vegas stage.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 90</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;It is in the nature of the medium that it must suppress the content of ideas in order to accommodate the requirements of visual interest; that is to say, to accommodate the values of show business.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 92</div></div><p>I&rsquo;m not sure whether he&rsquo;s mixing up cause and effect here. There are chemical reasons that have nothing to do with medium. Take Dan Brown, for instance. Or any of the most popular books today. We know more about brain chemistry than we used to.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;No one turns on radio anymore for soap operas or a presidential address (if a television set is at hand). But everyone goes to television for all these things and more, which is why television resonates so powerfully throughout the culture.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 92</div></div><p>Podcasts and audio books are very popular now. Although it&rsquo;s unclear what percentage they are relative to TikTok (probably super-low; no-one reads anymore). Even popular SubStacks now offer &ldquo;listen to this article&rdquo;.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Whereas the latter believes that you don’t have to be boring to be holy, the former apparently believes you don’t have to be holy at all.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 93</div></div><p>The author is very conservative, almost reactionary. He has no sense of humor and doesn&rsquo;t see at all how levity can mix with serious information. He would haved hated Bill Hicks, who was a poet of incisive commentary. He said with a few words what a bloviator would say with pages.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;So far as I know, it has been used only once before in a classroom: Hegel tried it several times in demonstrating how the dialectical method works.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 95</div></div><p>I think this guy&rsquo;s mad that no-one thinks he&rsquo;s funny. His attempts at humor are so dry that they&rsquo;ve been wrung completely free of wit. Chris Hedges wrote the foreword to Lee Camp&rsquo;s book. That strikes a better balance.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Those who apply would, in fact, submit to you their eight-by-ten glossies, from which you would eliminate those whose countenances are not suitable for nightly display. This means that you will exclude women who are not beautiful or who are over the age of fifty, men who are bald, all people who are overweight or whose noses are too long or whose eyes are too close together.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 100</div></div><p>It&rsquo;s still kind of like this, but the Internet has definitely made space for all kinds online to get exposure. In that sense, communication has been democratized. Even the ugly find audiences because they are allowed to search without being a priori filtered out.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;This is a matter of considerable importance, for it goes beyond the question of how truth is perceived on television news shows. If on television, credibility replaces reality as the decisive test of truth-telling, political leaders need not trouble themselves very much with reality provided that their performances consistently generate a sense of verisimilitude.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 102</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;It is simply not possible to convey a sense of seriousness about any event if its implications are exhausted in less than one minute’s time. In fact, it is quite obvious that TV news has no intention of suggesting that any story has any implications, for that would require viewers to continue to think about it when it is done and therefore obstruct their attending to the next story that waits panting in the wings.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 103</div></div><p>This has changed quite a bit with the advent of 24h news. Now they belabor a story to death. Also, now, we have the ability to pause and replay and reflect. If we take this opportunity, then we can use television for our own purposes, rather than be used by it.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The viewers also know that no matter how grave any fragment of news may appear (for example, on the day I write a Marine Corps general has declared that nuclear war between the United States and Russia is inevitable),&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 104</div></div><p>That&rsquo;s not news, that&rsquo;s hearsay, fuckwit. Don&rsquo;t confuse gravity for truth. If people ignore it, it might be not that they don&rsquo;t care, but that they know that official sources arehorseshit. I feel that his thesis is sound, but that his examples are superficial and lacking in conclusiveness, which gravely undermines the thesis, if those are the only examples he can come up with.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Imagine what you would think of me, and this book, if I were to pause here, tell you that I will return to my discussion in a moment, and then proceed to write a few words in behalf of United Airlines or the Chase Manhattan Bank. You would rightly think that I had no respect for you and, certainly, no respect for the subject. And if I did this not once but several times in each chapter, you would think the whole enterprise unworthy of your attention.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 104</div></div><p>Very good! Great analogy.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;We have become so accustomed to its discontinuities that we are no longer struck dumb, as any sane person would be, by a newscaster who having just reported that a nuclear war is inevitable goes on to say that he will be right back after this word from Burger King; who says, in other words, “Now … this.” One can hardly overestimate the damage that such juxtapositions do to our sense of the world as a serious place.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 104</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;In watching television news, they, more than any other segment of the audience, are drawn into an epistemology based on the assumption that all reports of cruelty and death are greatly exaggerated and, in any case, not to be taken seriously or responded to sanely.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 105</div></div><p>That is the correct lesson to draw, though. Television news is useless as a source of fact. That&rsquo;s not what it&rsquo;s for. No need to lament it. Also, people don&rsquo;t really want to be informed, they certainly don&rsquo;t want to read. I don&rsquo;t think he examines enough WHY things are this way.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;By television’s standards, the audience is minuscule, the program is confined to public-television stations, and it, is a good guess that the combined salary of MacNeil and Lehrer is one-fifth of Dan Rather’s or Tom Brokaw’s.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 106</div></div><p>Here would be the ideal place to address the corruptive influence of capitalism and market forces on onformation dissemination to an informed public.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;What is happening here is that television is altering the meaning of “being informed” by creating a species of information that might properly be called disinformation. I am using this word almost in the precise sense in which it is used by spies in the CIA or KGB. Disinformation does not mean false information. It means misleading information—misplaced, irrelevant, fragmented or superficial information—information that creates the illusion of knowing something but which in fact leads one away from knowing. In saying this, I do not mean to imply that television news deliberately aims to deprive Americans of a coherent, contextual understanding of their world. I mean to say that when news is packaged as entertainment, that is the inevitable result. And in saying that the television news show entertains but does not inform, I am saying something far more serious than that we are being deprived of authentic information. I am saying we are losing our sense of what it means to be well informed. Ignorance is always correctable. But what shall we do if we take ignorance to be knowledge?&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 107</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Walter Lippmann, for example, wrote in 1920: “There can be no liberty for a community which lacks the means by which to detect lies.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 108</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;But this case refutes his assumption. The reporters who cover the White House are ready and able to expose lies, and thus create the grounds for informed and indignant opinion. But apparently the public declines to take an interest. To press reports of White House dissembling, the public has replied with Queen Victoria’s famous line: “We are not amused.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 108</div></div><p>I think here he is misled by the reporters who blame their lack of coverage on their listeners, when it is they who determine what people want. Cart before the horse. Maybe the NYT was different then, but this suspiciously exactly like the same shit they pull today.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The only thing to be amused about is the bafflement of reporters at the public’s indifference. There is an irony in the fact that the very group that has taken the world apart should, on trying to piece it together again, be surprised that no one notices much, or cares.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 110</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The President does not have the press under his thumb. The New York Times and The Washington Post are not Pravda; the Associated Press is not Tass. And there is no Newspeak here. Lies have not been defined as truth nor truth as lies. All that has happened is that the public has adjusted to incoherence and been amused into indifference.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 110</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Huxley grasped, as Orwell did not, that it is not necessary to conceal anything from a public insensible to contradiction and narcoticized by technological diversions.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 111</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;In presenting news to us packaged as vaudeville, television induces other media to do the same, so that the total information environment begins to mirror television.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 111</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;When her audiences are shown in reaction shots, they are almost always laughing. As a consequence, it would be difficult to distinguish them from audiences, say, at the Sands Hotel in Las Vegas, except for the fact that they have a slightly cleaner, more wholesome look.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 114</div></div><p>Oh dear, your prejudice is showing.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;As I write, the trend in call-in shows is for the “host” to insult callers whose language does not, in itself, go much beyond humanoid grunting. Such programs have little content, as this word used to be defined, and are merely of archeological interest in that they give us a sense of what a dialogue among Neanderthals might have been like.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 112</div></div><p>Jesus. This sounds more like the precursor to today&rsquo;s liberal snobbery than reasoned criticism. Compare again to Hedges, who does not descend to this ad-hominem level.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;To achieve this goal, the most modern methods of marketing and promotion are abundantly used, such as offering free pamphlets, Bibles and gifts, and, in Jerry Falwell’s case, two free “Jesus First” pins.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 121</div></div><p>Nowadays, they sell themselves more cheaply: for NFTs.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;By substituting images for claims, the pictorial commercial made emotional appeal, not tests of truth, the basis of consumer decisions. The distance between rationality and advertising is now so wide that it is difficult to remember that there once existed a connection between them. Today, on television commercials, propositions are as scarce as unattractive people. The truth or falsity of an advertiser’s claim is simply not an issue. A McDonald’s commercial, for example, is not a series of testable, logically ordered assertions. It is a drama—a mythology, if you will—of handsome people selling, buying and eating hamburgers, and being driven to near ecstasy by their good fortune.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 127</div></div><p>Part of this is also that commercials aim to separate a large group of people from their disposable income. That group didn&rsquo;t used to be as large as it is now. Nor did we hear about them all the time. We hear about fools buying NFTs of sneakers as if we could be them. We travel in very different circles.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;What the advertiser needs to know is not what is right about the product but what is wrong about the buyer. And so, the balance of business expenditures shifts from product research to market research. The television commercial has oriented business away from making products of value and toward making consumers feel valuable,&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 128</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Terence Moran, I believe, lands on the target in saying that with media whose structure is biased toward furnishing images and fragments, we are deprived of access to an historical perspective.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 137</div></div><p>This hypothesis is belied by a wealth of (often, manipulative) documentaries. But books manipulate history, as well, though, admittedly, perhaps not as immediately successfully.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;But the Founding Fathers did not foresee that tyranny by government might be superseded by another sort of problem altogether, namely, the corporate state, which through television now controls the flow of public discourse in America. I raise no strong objection to this fact (at least not here) and have no intention of launching into a standard-brand complaint against the corporate state. I merely note the fact with apprehension,&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 139</div></div><p>Keeps the book shorter.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Television does not ban books, it simply displaces them.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 141</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Censorship, after all, is the tribute tyrants pay to the assumption that a public knows the difference between serious discourse and entertainment—and cares. How delighted would be all the kings, czars and führers of the past (and commissars of the present) to know that censorship is not a necessity when all political discourse takes the form of a jest.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 141</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;I don’t mean to imply that the situation is a result of a conspiracy or even that those who control television want this responsibility. I mean only to say that, like the alphabet or the printing press, television has by its power to control the time, attention and cognitive habits of our youth gained the power to control their education.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 145</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;[…] There exists no evidence that students who were required to view “Watch Your Mouth” increased their competence in the use of the English language.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 151</div></div><p><span class="quote-inline">&ldquo;There exists no evidence&rdquo;</span> because it didn&rsquo;t work or because they didn&rsquo;t measure?</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;When a population becomes distracted by trivia, when cultural life is redefined as a perpetual round of entertainments, when serious public conversation becomes a form of baby-talk, when, in short, a people become an audience and their public business a vaudeville act, then a nation finds itself at risk; culture-death is a clear possibility.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 155</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;In the first place, not everyone believes a cure is needed, and in the second, there probably isn’t any. But as a true-blue American who has imbibed the unshakable belief that where there is a problem, there must be a solution, I shall conclude with the following suggestions.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 158</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Americans will not shut down any part of their technological apparatus, and to suggest that they do so is to make no suggestion at all.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 158</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Television, as I have implied earlier, serves us most usefully when presenting junk-entertainment ; it serves us most ill when it co-opts serious modes of discourse—news, politics, science, education, commerce, religion—and turns them into entertainment packages. We would all be better off if television got worse, not better. “The A-Team” and “Cheers” are no threat to our public health. “60 Minutes,” “Eye-Witness News” and “Sesame Street” are.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 159</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;To ask is to break the spell. To which I might add that questions about the psychic, political and social effects of information are as applicable to the computer as to television. Although I believe the computer to be a vastly overrated technology, I mention it here because, clearly, Americans have accorded it their customary mindless inattention; which means they will use it as they are told, without a whimper.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 161</div></div><p>So wrong and so right.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Until, years from now, when it will be noticed that the massive collection and speed-of-light retrieval of data have been of great value to large-scale organizations but have solved very little of importance to most people and have created at least as many problems for them as they may have solved.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 161</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;In order to command an audience large enough to make a difference, one would have to make the programs vastly amusing, in the television style. Thus, the act of criticism itself would, in the end, be co-opted by television. The parodists would become celebrities, would star in movies, and would end up making television commercials.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 162</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;For in the end, he was trying to tell us that what afflicted the people in Brave New World was not that they were laughing instead of thinking, but that they did not know what they were laughing about and why they had stopped thinking.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 163</div></div>      </div>
      </div>
        <div class="footer">
    <div class="footer-data"><div class="footer-links"><ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/contact.php" title="">Contact</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/support.php" title="">Support</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/privacy.php" title="">Privacy</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/rights.php" title="">Rights</a></li></ul></div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="copyright">Copyright (c) 1999-2026 earthli.com. All Rights Reserved.</div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="versions">Powered by <ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore/app_news.php">earthli News 3.7</a></li><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore" title="">earthli WebCore&trade; 3.7</a></li></ul></div></div>    </div>
      </div>
  </div>  </body>
</html>
]]>
  </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
      <title type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[MaddAddam by Margaret Atwood (2013) (read in 2022)]]>
  </title>
    <id>https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=4465</id>
    <link href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=4465"/>
    <updated>2022-05-29T22:57:57+02:00</updated>
    <author>
        <name type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[Marco von Ballmoos]]>
  </name>
      <uri>https://earthli.com/users/marco</uri>
    </author>
      <summary type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<p><small class="notes">Standard disclaimer [1]</small></p>
<p>This is the last of three novels in the MaddAddam trilogy. It picks up where the first two books left off: the rescue of Jimmy and Amanda from the clutches of the two Painballers. Ren and Toby lead everyone home, back to the compound where they&rsquo;ve set up camp with the Crakers.... [<a class="complete-text-link" href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=4465">More</a>]</p>
]]>
  </summary>
      <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<html lang="en">
  <head>
    <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/themes/ice.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/fonts/raleway.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/core/medium.css">
  </head>
  <body>
<div class="style-controls">  <div class="page">
    <div class="page-body">
<div class="info-box-top">
<p>
Published by <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_user.php?name=marco" title="Marco von Ballmoos" class="visible">marco</a> on <span class="date-time">29. May 2022 22:57:57 (GMT-5)</span>
</p>
</div>
      <div class="text-flow wide">
  <p><small class="notes">Standard disclaimer [1]</small></p>
<p>This is the last of three novels in the MaddAddam trilogy. It picks up where the first two books left off: the rescue of Jimmy and Amanda from the clutches of the two Painballers. Ren and Toby lead everyone home, back to the compound where they&rsquo;ve set up camp with the Crakers. Soon, they are joined by Zeb, who takes up with Toby, despite her misgivings that he will take up with the slutty Swift Fox.</p>
<p>Despite the high level of education for most of the members of this last group of humanity, the camp starts to devolve into the human behaviors that Crake had recognized as dangerous. Unlike his artificial race of Crakers, this remnant of humanity starts to breed again and entertain petty jealousies. Luckily, the pregnancies turn out to have been initiated by the Crakers.</p>
<p>The Crakers, in their naïveté, release the two painballers from their constricting ropes. The current-day part of the plot involves finding a way to eliminate these two without having to kill them. They know they have to deal with them, but are unsure how to retain their own humanity if they just start killing people. The Pigoons turn out to be more intelligent than the Crakers. They make peace with the humans and team up with them against the painballers, who&rsquo;d killed one of their piglets for sport.</p>
<p>A large part of the novel fills in Zeb&rsquo;s and Adams&rsquo;s backstory. Zeb tells of his formative years while lying in bed with Toby, who prompts him for more information, ostensibly to tell the Crakers in the nightly story hour, where Zeb has acquired a starring role. Zeb&rsquo;s feats gain a dimension beyond even those of Crake in the Crakers&rsquo; eyes. But these stories all get mixed up in the Craker&rsquo;s limited comprehension until myth and reality are indistinguishable. The Crakers will end up knowing what they think they know.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;There’s the story, then there’s the real story, then there’s the story of how the story came to be told. Then there’s what you leave out of the story. Which is part of the story too.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 70</div></div><p>Zeb&rsquo;s backstory is very interesting and fills in some missing pieces—he and Adam One are step-brothers. Their father is a sleazy reverend with a shifty ministry that Adam and Zeb end up taking down, in the end. Zeb is a hacker extraordinaire who uses his skills to squirrel away a lot of the reverend&rsquo;s ill-gotten gains before they expose him to the authorities.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The least said the better online, even if you thought your space was secure. The net had always been just that – a net, full of holes, all the better to trap you with; and it still was, despite the fixes they claimed to be adding constantly, with the impenetrable algorithms and the passwords and thumb scans.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 294</div></div><p>As in the first two novels, Atwood wraps everything in an admonition to an deaf and uncaring humanity to stop ruining the planet and all of the creatures on it. She calls us <span class="quote-inline">&ldquo;the people in the chaos&rdquo;</span>. It is against the sins of these people that Zeb and Adam found the God&rsquo;s Gardeners, who end up being some of the only survivors of the <em>Flood</em>.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The people in the chaos cannot learn. They cannot understand what they are doing to the sea and the sky and the plants and the animals. They cannot understand that they are killing them, and that they will end by killing themselves. And there are so many of them, and each one of them is doing part of the killing, whether they know it or not. And when you tell them to stop, they don’t hear you.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 353</div></div><p>Toby begins teaching a young one how to read and write. This was very much not Crake&rsquo;s plan. But, though he was a genius, he was single-minded and didn&rsquo;t play well with others. What right has such a person to plan the future of all of humanity? The Crakers grow and learn and, by the end of novel, have taken over from the handful of God&rsquo;s Gardeners who shepherded them from the dark intermezzo into their more hopeful present. Perhaps the Crakers will do better.</p>
<p><hr></p>
<div class="footnote-reference"><span id="footnote_DRAFTABLE_ENTRY_4465_1_body" class="footnote-number">[1]</span> Disclaimer: these are notes I took while reading this book. They include citations I found interesting or enlightening or particularly well-written. In some cases, I&rsquo;ve pointed out which of these applies to which citation; in others, I have not. Any benefit you gain from reading these notes is purely incidental to the purpose they serve of reminding me of what I once read. Please see Wikipedia for a summary if I&rsquo;ve failed to provide one sufficient for your purposes. If my notes serve to trigger an interest in this book, then I&rsquo;m happy for you.</div><h2>Citations</h2><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;All the patios must be derelict now, the swimming pools cracked and empty or clogged with weeds, the broken kitchen windows invaded by the probing green snoutlets of vines. Inside the houses, nests in the corners made from chewed-up carpets, wriggling and squeaking with hairless baby rats. Termites mining through the rafters. Bats hawking for moths in the stairwells.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 43</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;There’s the story, then there’s the real story, then there’s the story of how the story came to be told. Then there’s what you leave out of the story. Which is part of the story too.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 70</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;That was how Zeb had positioned himself: bulked up on natural steroids, do what had to be done, could take the pace, wings on the ankles, needed the money, liked the shadowy rimlands where nobody official could stick their tentacles into your back pocket, within which the contents of other people’s hacked bank accounts might be bashfully lurking.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 72</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;“I remember adapt,” says Toby. “It was another way of saying tough luck. To people you weren’t going to help out.”</p>
<p>&ldquo;“You got it,” said Zeb. “Anyway, feeding trash to the bears didn’t help them adapt, it just taught them that food falls out of the sky. They’d start slavering every time they heard the sound of a ’thopter, they had their very own cargo cult.&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 74</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The worst of it was listening to the green-nosed furfucker sermonizing that went on in the Bearlifttown bars when you were trying to get spongefaced on the crapulous booze they hauled in there and dispensed by the vatful.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 77</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;[…] he tried to stay out of brawls, never having seen any percentage in rolling around under bar stools with some enraged moron who considered he’d staked eternal twat rights because of his pre-eminent cock and his dimples, and who might have a knife.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 77</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The Corps didn’t like Bearlift, but they didn’t try to shut it down either, though they could have done that with one finger. It served a function for them, sounded a note of hope, distracted folks from the real action, which was bulldozing the planet flat and grabbing anything of value. They had no objection to the standard Bearlift ad, with a smiling green furfucker telling everyone what a sterling lot of good Bearlift was doing, and please send more cash or you’ll be guilty of bearicide.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 85</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Some bureauscheme to transport oil inland through a pipeline during World War Two, to keep it from being blown up by coastal submarines. They’d brought a whole bunch of soldiers up from the South to build the system, black guys, a lot of them. They’d never been in subzero cold and five-day blizzards and twenty-four-hour darkness; they must’ve thought they were in hell. Local legend had it a third of them went crazy. He could see going crazy here, even without the blizzards.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 92</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;[…] love to go a-wandering, along the bums of sluts,<br>
And as I go I love to sing, although they drive me nuts.<br>
Fuckeree, fuckera, fuckeree, fucker ah hah hah hah hah ha …&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 97</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;He’d be up against it, up against everything that filled the space he was moving through, with no glass pane of language coming between him and not-him. Not-him was seeping into him through his defences, through his edges, eating away at form, sending its rootlets into his head like reverse hairs. Soon he’d be overgrown, one with the moss. He needed to keep moving, preserve his outlines, define himself by his own shockwaves, the wake he left in the air. To keep alert, to stay attuned to the, to the what? To whatever might come at him and stop him dead.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 99</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Thank you means … Thank you means you did something good for me. Or something you thought was good. And that good thing was giving me a fish. So that made me happy, but the part that really made me happy was that you wanted me to be happy. That’s what Thank you means.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 104</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;A scar is like writing on your body. It tells about something that once happened to you, such as a cut on your skin where blood came out.</p>
<p>&ldquo;What is writing, Oh Toby?</p>
<p>&ldquo;Writing is when you make marks on a piece of paper – on a stone – on a flat surface, like the sand on the beach, and each of the marks means a sound, and the sounds joined together mean a word, and the words joined together mean … </p>
<p>&ldquo;How do you make this writing, Oh Toby?</p>
<p>&ldquo;You make it with a keyboard, or no – once you made it with a pen or a pencil, a pencil is a … Or you make it with a stick.</p>
<p>&ldquo;Oh Toby, I do not understand.</p>
<p>&ldquo;You make a mark with a stick on your skin, you cut your skin open and then it is a scar, and that scar turns into a voice? It speaks, it tells us things?</p>
<p>&ldquo;Oh Toby, can we hear what the scar says? Show us how to make these scars that talk!&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 112</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;You’ve seen the way she looks at Zeb. Eyelashes like Venus flytraps, and that sideways leer of the irises, like some outdated cut-rate prostibot commercial: Bacteria-Resistant Fibres, 100% Fluid-Flushing, Lifelike Moans, ClenchOMeter for Optimal Satisfaction.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 118</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The Rev had his very own cult. That was the way to go in those days if you wanted to coin the megabucks and you had a facility for ranting and bullying, plus golden-tongued whip-’em-up preaching, and you lacked some other grey-area but highly marketable skill, such as derivatives trading. Tell people what they want to hear, call yourself a religion, put the squeeze on for contributions, run your own media outlets and use them for robocalls and slick online campaigns, befriend or threaten politicians, evade taxes. You had to give the guy some credit. He was twisted as a pretzel, he was a tinfoil-halo shit-nosed frogstomping king rat asshole, but he wasn’t stupid.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 136</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;Already she was beginning to emerge from the initial sex-induced coma created by him through the magic of his first-contact-with-aliens puppy-on-speed gonadal enthusiasm.</p>
<p>&ldquo;Young guys have no taste as such in sexual matters – no discrimination. They’re like those penguins that shocked the Victorians, they’ll bonk anything with a cavity, and Wynette had been the beneficiary in Zeb’s case.</p>
<p>&ldquo;Not to brag, but during their nightly tangles her eyes had rolled so far up into her head that she looked like the undead half the time, and the amplified rockband noises she made had caused thumping and banging both from the alcohol store on the ground floor and from whatever nestful of mournful wage slaves lived above them.&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 205</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;[…] anyone who objected too much was smeared as a twisted Commie bent on spoiling everyone’s fun, even the fun of those who weren’t having any fun. But spoiling the fun they might have later. Their fun-in-the-sky.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 222</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;By extension, anyone who liked smelling the daisies, and having daisies to smell, and eating mercury-free fish, and who objected to giving birth to three-eyed infants via the toxic sludge in their drinking water was a demon-possessed Satanic minion of darkness, hell-bent on sabotaging the American Way and God’s Holy Oil, which were one and the same.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 223</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;[…] the mouldy, leaking buildings had been turned into divided-space unit rentals. These hosted a coral-reef ecosystem of dealers and addicts and pilotfish and drunks and hookers and pyramid scheme fly-by-nighters and jackals and shell-gamers and rent-gougers, all parasitizing one another.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 228</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Marjorie had a blunt-nosed, brown-eyed, acquiescent face, like a spaniel, and in ordinary circumstances he would have proceeded, but as it was he said he hoped he’d see her around. Such a hope was not the top hope on his list of hopes – that spot was reserved for not getting caught – but it was not the bottom hope either.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 240</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Now what have I done? she thinks. What can of worms have I opened? They’re so quick, these children: they’ll pick this up and transmit it to all the others. What comes next? Rules, dogmas, laws? The Testament of Crake? How soon before there are ancient texts they feel they have to obey but have forgotten how to interpret? Have I ruined them?&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 250</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Saint Vavilov, who collected the seeds and preserved them throughout the siege of Leningrad, only to fall victim to the tyrant Stalin; and Saint Vandana, tireless warrior against biopiracy, who gave of herself for the good of the Living Vegetable World in all its diversity and beauty. Lend us the purity of your Spirits and the strength of your resolve.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 255</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The least said the better online, even if you thought your space was secure. The net had always been just that – a net, full of holes, all the better to trap you with; and it still was, despite the fixes they claimed to be adding constantly, with the impenetrable algorithms and the passwords and thumb scans.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 294</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Down the hallway, purple-carpeted. Up the stairs: smell of a pleasure factory in the off hours, so sad. That moppet-shop smell that meant false raunchiness, that meant loneliness, that meant you got loved only if you paid.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 306</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;“They’re using their vitamin supplement pills and over-the-counter painkillers as vectors for diseases – ones for which they control the drug treatments. Whatever’s in the white ones is in actual deployment. Random distribution, so no one will suspect a specific location of being ground zero. They make money all ways: on the vitamins, then on the drugs, and finally on the hospitalization when the illness takes firm hold. As it does, because the treatment drugs are loaded too. A very good plan for siphoning the victims’ money into Corps pockets.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 308</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;I am not in this part of the story; it hasn’t come to the part with me. But I’m waiting, far off in the future. I’m waiting for the story of Zeb to join up with mine. The story of Toby. The story I am in right now, with you.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 312</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Because when he was not looking, some of the words fell out of the egg onto the ground, and some fell into the water, and some blew away in the air. And none of the people saw them. But the animals and the birds and the fish did see them, and ate them up. They were a different kind of word, so it was sometimes hard for people to understand the animals. They had chewed the words up too small.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 352</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The people in the chaos cannot learn. They cannot understand what they are doing to the sea and the sky and the plants and the animals. They cannot understand that they are killing them, and that they will end by killing themselves. And there are so many of them, and each one of them is doing part of the killing, whether they know it or not. And when you tell them to stop, they don’t hear you.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 353</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;no one could mistake me for anything but an overgrown dim bulb who couldn’t get any other job. Frasket-sitting on a train – how pathetic was that? ‘If you’re where no one expects you to be,’ old Slaight of Hand used to say, ‘you’re invisible.’&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 383</div></div>      </div>
      </div>
        <div class="footer">
    <div class="footer-data"><div class="footer-links"><ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/contact.php" title="">Contact</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/support.php" title="">Support</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/privacy.php" title="">Privacy</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/rights.php" title="">Rights</a></li></ul></div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="copyright">Copyright (c) 1999-2026 earthli.com. All Rights Reserved.</div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="versions">Powered by <ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore/app_news.php">earthli News 3.7</a></li><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore" title="">earthli WebCore&trade; 3.7</a></li></ul></div></div>    </div>
      </div>
  </div>  </body>
</html>
]]>
  </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
      <title type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[The Boys by Garth Ennis & Darick Robertson (2006--2012) (read in 2021)]]>
  </title>
    <id>https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=4263</id>
    <link href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=4263"/>
    <updated>2022-02-18T23:43:35+01:00</updated>
    <author>
        <name type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[Marco von Ballmoos]]>
  </name>
      <uri>https://earthli.com/users/marco</uri>
    </author>
      <summary type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<p><small class="notes">Standard disclaimer [1]</small></p>
<p>The Boys is a story about a world with super-powered beings (&ldquo;supes&rdquo;). This is not unusual for comic books, or graphic novels. The distinction is that this story  doesn&rsquo;t make a distinction between superheroes and supervillains. It doesn&rsquo;t believe that superheroes exist. Or it... [<a class="complete-text-link" href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=4263">More</a>]</p>
]]>
  </summary>
      <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<html lang="en">
  <head>
    <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/themes/ice.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/fonts/raleway.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/core/medium.css">
  </head>
  <body>
<div class="style-controls">  <div class="page">
    <div class="page-body">
<div class="info-box-top">
<p>
Published by <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_user.php?name=marco" title="Marco von Ballmoos" class="visible">marco</a> on <span class="date-time">18. Feb 2022 23:43:35 (GMT-5)</span>
</p>
<p>
Updated by <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_user.php?name=marco" title="Marco von Ballmoos" class="visible">marco</a> on <span class="date-time">18. Feb 2022 23:44:18 (GMT-5)</span>
</p>
</div>
      <div class="text-flow wide">
  <p><small class="notes">Standard disclaimer [1]</small></p>
<p>The Boys is a story about a world with super-powered beings (&ldquo;supes&rdquo;). This is not unusual for comic books, or graphic novels. The distinction is that this story  doesn&rsquo;t make a distinction between superheroes and supervillains. It doesn&rsquo;t believe that superheroes exist. Or it grudgingly concedes that some super-powered beings seem not to take advantage of their powers for personal gain. The only example of a high-level super-powered being who does so is Annie.</p>
<p>The story starts with Hughie, whose girlfriend is slaughtered by accident by the super-powered A-Train, one of Vought&rsquo;s Seven. The Seven are the pinnacle of the supe pyramid, at the top of the media and publicity and merchandising and franchising game. It&rsquo;s all about money, money and power. The supes are a decadent lot, depicting in loving detail in these books, with lots of sex and violence.</p>
<p><hr></p>
<div class="footnote-reference"><span id="footnote_DRAFTABLE_ENTRY_4263_1_body" class="footnote-number">[1]</span> Disclaimer: these are notes I took while reading this book. They include citations I found interesting or enlightening or particularly well-written. In some cases, I&rsquo;ve pointed out which of these applies to which citation; in others, I have not. Any benefit you gain from reading these notes is purely incidental to the purpose they serve of reminding me of what I once read. Please see Wikipedia for a summary if I&rsquo;ve failed to provide one sufficient for your purposes. If my notes serve to trigger an interest in this book, then I&rsquo;m happy for you.</div><h2>Citations</h2><p><span style="width: 644px; display: table"><span class="auto-content-inline"><a href="https://www.earthli.com/data/news/attachments/entry/4263/boys_2.jpg"><img src="https://www.earthli.com/data/news/attachments/entry/4263/boys_2.jpg" alt=" " style="width: 644px"></a></span><span class="auto-content-caption"><a href="https://www.earthli.com/data/news/attachments/entry/4263/boys_2.jpg">Boys #2</a></span></span></p>
<p>When Hughie asks whether the CIA is pulling all of the strings, Butcher answers,</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;Oh, bloody hell.</p>
<p>&ldquo;Hughie, not even in their wildest dreams could those tits run the world. An&rsquo; it&rsquo;s not secret societies, it&rsquo;s not the Illuminati or Department X meetin&rsquo; in a room no one even knows exists. It&rsquo;s none of that.</p>
<p>&ldquo;It&rsquo;s just the plain old company.</p>
<p>&ldquo;Fat blokes an&rsquo; geeks sit in their offices tynna think up ways to watch people. To do nothin&rsquo; more than keep the world <em>exactly the way it is.</em></p>
<p>&ldquo;Which means power in the hands of the powerful. Which mean the status quo.&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote>      </div>
      </div>
        <div class="footer">
    <div class="footer-data"><div class="footer-links"><ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/contact.php" title="">Contact</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/support.php" title="">Support</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/privacy.php" title="">Privacy</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/rights.php" title="">Rights</a></li></ul></div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="copyright">Copyright (c) 1999-2026 earthli.com. All Rights Reserved.</div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="versions">Powered by <ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore/app_news.php">earthli News 3.7</a></li><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore" title="">earthli WebCore&trade; 3.7</a></li></ul></div></div>    </div>
      </div>
  </div>  </body>
</html>
]]>
  </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
      <title type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[Books read in 2021]]>
  </title>
    <id>https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=4157</id>
    <link href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=4157"/>
    <updated>2022-02-18T23:41:49+01:00</updated>
    <author>
        <name type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[Marco von Ballmoos]]>
  </name>
      <uri>https://earthli.com/users/marco</uri>
    </author>
      <summary type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<p>Since the list of books and reviews and notes for the <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/app]/view_article.php?id=3711">last</a> <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/app]/view_article.php?id=3888">couple</a> of years got a little bit out of hand, I&rsquo;ve only included <em>partial</em> notes and review of each book in this article. This year, the separate article for each book generally includes many more notes and review material, as well as... [<a class="complete-text-link" href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=4157">More</a>]</p>
]]>
  </summary>
      <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<html lang="en">
  <head>
    <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/themes/ice.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/fonts/raleway.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/core/medium.css">
  </head>
  <body>
<div class="style-controls">  <div class="page">
    <div class="page-body">
<div class="info-box-top">
<p>
Published by <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_user.php?name=marco" title="Marco von Ballmoos" class="visible">marco</a> on <span class="date-time">18. Feb 2022 23:41:49 (GMT-5)</span>
</p>
<p>
Updated by <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_user.php?name=marco" title="Marco von Ballmoos" class="visible">marco</a> on <span class="date-time">18. Feb 2022 23:46:29 (GMT-5)</span>
</p>
</div>
      <div class="text-flow wide">
  <p>Since the list of books and reviews and notes for the <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/app]/view_article.php?id=3711">last</a> <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/app]/view_article.php?id=3888">couple</a> of years got a little bit out of hand, I&rsquo;ve only included <em>partial</em> notes and review of each book in this article. This year, the separate article for each book generally includes many more notes and review material, as well as citations and rough notes.</p>
<dl><dt class="field">Arsène Lupin, gentleman-cambrioleur (1907)</dt>
<dd><div class=" "><p>by <em>Maurice Leblanc</em></p>
<p>This is a collection of stories about Arsène Lupin, a gentleman thief.</p>
<ul>
<li><em>L’Arrestation d’Arsène Lupin</em>: Lupin travels from France to America on a transatlantic liner. He is arrested in New York City by his nemesis Inspector Ganimard</li>
<li><em>Arsène Lupin en prison</em>: Lupin robs a castle while still in prison. He fools the owner by posing as Ganimard.</li>
<li><em>L’Évasion d’Arsène Lupin</em>: Lupin escapes from prison twice. Ganimard is flouted in court by a man who appears to be Lupin but isn&rsquo;t, but is?</li>
<li><em>Le Mystérieux Voyageur</em>: Lupin is himself robbed while on a train, teams up with completely unwitting police officers, and hunts down the wanted criminal who&rsquo;d robbed him.</li>
<li><em>Le Collier de la reine</em>: This is Lupin&rsquo;s origin story, wherein he steals a necklace as a very young boy. The story is told by Lupin himself thirty years later to those from whom he stole.</li>
<li><em>Le Sept de cœur</em>: Lupin enriches himself while fooling everyone and thwarting a terrorist plot to steal the plans for an advanced submarine.</li>
<li><em>Le Coffre-fort de madame Imbert</em>: Lupin tries to run a con on a couple who have a safe full of money, but they end up fooling him into stealing their &ldquo;money&rdquo;—which turns out to be fake. They collect insurance and ends up with nothing but paper.</li>
<li><em>La Perle noire</em>: Once again, Lupin solves another robbery and murder while also managing to steal a treasure himself.</li>
<li><em>Sherlock Holmès arrive trop tard</em>: Lupin matches withs with Herlock Sholmes, staying one step ahead of him the whole way—and even managing to steal the great detective&rsquo;s watch from his own arm.</li></ul><p>I&rsquo;ve included <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3889">notes, citations and errata</a> in a separate post.</p>
</div></dd>
<dt class="field">The Churn (2014)</dt>
<dd><div class=" "><p>by <em>James S.A. Corey</em></p>
<p>This is one of the earliest stories in the entire Expanse universe. It takes place before even Leviathan Wakes. This is Amos Burton&rsquo;s origin story. It tells the story of how he started as a young thug named Timmy, in the employ of Baltimore crime lord Amos Burton. He ends up running protection for an identity-grifter named Erich who works for Burton. Timmy lives with Lydia, an older woman who rescued him after his mother had died. She also had worked for Amos Burton, as a prostitute. Their relationship is complicated: he protects her, but is also her lover. Timmy&rsquo;s gift for violence is prodigious. He is taciturn to a fault. This impresses Burton.</p>
<p>On an assignment to protect Erich while he&rsquo;s on a job, all hell breaks loose. The entire neighborhood is raided by the police/authorities and he, Lydia, and Erich are forced to flee the area and, likely, Burton&rsquo;s ambit. Timmy had an island prepared where he spirits them away. He even manages to get Erich an identity-building kit. After Timmy has decapitated the organization by killing Burton, Erich uses the kit to rebuild the Amos Burton identity for Timmy, allowing him to escape off of Earth—but he can never return to Baltimore.</p>
<p>I&rsquo;ve included <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=4271">notes, citations and errata</a> in a separate post.</p>
</div></dd>
<dt class="field">The Butcher of Anderson Station (2011)</dt>
<dd><div class=" "><p>by <em>James S.A. Corey</em></p>
<p>This is one of the earliest stories in the entire Expanse universe. It takes place before even <em>Leviathan Wakes</em>. It is a short story about Fred Johnson. It tells the story of how he started as an Earth marine and how he came to be known as the eponymous butcher.</p>
<p>The present-day Fred Johnson has been taken captive by Anderson Dawes, then-leader of the OPA. But Fred Johnson hasn&rsquo;t been captured because he&rsquo;s a danger to the OPA. Quite the contrary: Johnson has become a drunk and is considering ending it all. He regrets his role in the attack that made him famous throughout the system. Anderson Dawes sees this regret as a thin wedge that he can use to convert one of Earth&rsquo;s greatest assets to work for the Belters. The rest, as they say, is history.</p>
<p>I&rsquo;ve included <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=4270">notes, citations and errata</a> in a separate post.</p>
</div></dd>
<dt class="field">Leviathan Wakes (2011)</dt>
<dd><div class=" "><p>by <em>James S.A. Corey</em></p>
<p>This is the first book of the Expanse series. The crew of the ice-hauler Canterbury includes Earther XO Jim Holden, Belter Chief Engineer Naomi Nagata, Martian Navy pilot Alex Kamal, and Earther engineer Amos Burton. While they are on an excursion to investigate a distress call from the ship Scopuli, a stealth ship appears and destroys the Canterbury.</p>
<p>We meet detective Miller, learn of Julie Mao, and learn of the Protomolecule. Protogen schemes to harness its power, sacrificing the people of Eros. The crew of the <em>Rocinante</em>—along with Miller—figure out what&rsquo;s going on and, with the help of the OPA and Fred Johnson, put a stop to it. Eros is lost. When they try to destroy it, the Protomolecule defies physics to save itself. Only Miller&rsquo;s sacrifice avoids a strike on Earth, crashing into Venus instead.</p>
<p>I&rsquo;ve included <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=4234">notes, citations and errata</a> in a separate post.</p>
</div></dd>
<dt class="field">Subprime Attention Crisis (2020)</dt>
<dd><div class=" "><p>by <em>Tim Hwang</em></p>
<p>This is a short book about the digital advertising business, including its history, its present, and possible futures. The history is that the advertising business has always struggled with the essential fact that they are selling a largely unquantifiable product. There are feelings about the effectiveness of advertising, but little evidence for the effectiveness of a particular ad. Effectiveness is measured in two ways: directly contributing to a sale (e.g. rebates, sales, etc.), or general brand-name buildup, which leads to familiarity. Basically: the short game and the long game.</p>
<p>Even in the old days, there were a lot of steps in between putting up a billboard along a highway and noticing an uptick in sales months later. How much did the billboard contribute? It’s hard to say because there is no way to control for other factors. The online world is similar, but differs in an important way: the sellers of ad space claim that they can very precisely and accurately identify who looked at which advertisement for how long. This is the core claim that Hwang does a good job of dissecting and refuting.</p>
<p>I&rsquo;ve included <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=4285">notes, citations and errata</a> in a separate post.</p>
</div></dd>
<dt class="field">Caliban&rsquo;s War (2011)</dt>
<dd><div class=" "><p>by <em>James S.A. Corey</em></p>
<p>The second book of the <em>The Expanse</em> begins on Ganymede, where we meet Prax Meng, a botanist of consummate skill and education. He has a daughter Mei with a debilitating but controllable disease. She is kidnapped from her pre-school. We also meet Bobbie Draper, a Martian Marine deployed on the surface, opposing the Earth forces that are also stationed there. Tensions are already high when a mysterious humanoid without a spacesuit tears across the surface, eliminating the Earth forces as well as all of the Martian ones—except for Bobbie.</p>
<p>The <em>Rocinante</em> and its crew make their appearance months later, as part of the Fred Johnson-inspired support for Ganymede. They&rsquo;re there to bring food supplies to a planet that formerly the breadbasket of the outer system. That was before the Martian/Earth conflict in its near orbit brought its primary food domes crashing down.</p>
<p>We also meet Avasarala, who works for the U.N. and is a force to be reckoned with of her own. She pairs up with Bobbie and teams with the crew of the Roci to ferret out a plot in the U.N., find and rescue Mei, as well as defeat the last of the super-soldiers. The protomolecule on Venus finally bears fruit, ejecting it toward the outer solar system.</p>
<p>I&rsquo;ve included <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=4248">notes, citations and errata</a> in a separate post.</p>
</div></dd>
<dt class="field">The Gods of Risk (2012)</dt>
<dd><div class=" "><p>by <em>James S.A. Corey</em></p>
<p>This story takes place after Caliban&rsquo;s War, when Bobbie returns to Mars after having retired from the Mars Marines.</p>
<p>She&rsquo;s living with her brother and his family. Her nephew David is a gifted student, enrolled in the terraforming program at school. He&rsquo;s also a gifted chemist, so he&rsquo;s tempted to make extra money by creating drugs for a local dealer. This is the Breaking Bad storyline, I guess. David is infatuated with LeeLee, one of the girls who orbits the leader of the local gang.</p>
<p>In order to protected David, Bobbie starts working for the local gang, but she subverts their plans and manages to extricate David from the situation.</p>
<p>I&rsquo;ve included <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=4272">notes, citations and errata</a> in a separate post.</p>
</div></dd>
<dt class="field">Abaddon&rsquo;s Gate (2013)</dt>
<dd><div class=" "><p>by <em>James S.A. Corey</em></p>
<p>This is the third book of the <em>The Expanse</em> series. It tells the story of humanity&rsquo;s first interactions with The Ring, an alien artifact constructed by the protomolecule on Venus and launched into orbit out near Uranus. The Ring is guarded by a coalition of Belter, Martian, and Earther forces, preventing anyone from approaching it until it can be investigated more thoroughly.</p>
<p>The Roci and its crew are doing well, having improved the ship with a railgun. Miller, after his death on Venus, is &ldquo;haunting&rdquo; Holden. He has been resurrected by the protomolecule as a simulacrum to communicate with humanity…and to help the protomolecule search for…something.</p>
<p>The space on the other side of The Ring is a void, with only a mysterious station at the center of it, with ring gates opening on 1300 other systems. Any ship moving in it must stick to a speed limit of 600m/s or the station kills all of its systems and moves it to an orbiting junkyard. No-one has any idea how any of this works, nor how the physics behind it can be explained.</p>
<p>The builders of the protomolecule had been gone for billions of years, destroyed by something even more powerful than them. Despite their ability to span galaxies and billions of years, they were gone. What killed them? Was it still out there?</p>
<p>The Ring Gates are open, the station inert, the Roci is finally owned outright by its crew. Michio Pa is in charge of the Behemoth, which will be converted, once again, to a station named <em>Medina</em>. The protomolecule simulation named Miller is still lurking with Holden, searching for … something.</p>
<p>Humanity must decide what it’s going to do next.</p>
<p>I&rsquo;ve included <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=4273">notes, citations and errata</a> in a separate post.</p>
</div></dd>
<dt class="field">Automation and the Future of Work (2020)</dt>
<dd><div class=" "><p>by <em>Aaron Benanav</em></p>
<p>This book argues that the paucity of good jobs these days is due not to a rise in automation, but to a massive decrease in manufacturing output. That is, slow growth rates coupled with a system-wide overcapacity are a much better fit for explaining how we got to where we are today: economies in the west with ostensibly very low unemployment, but largely in the service industry with a much different benefits structure than past jobs.</p>
<p>Benanav sees a <abbr title="Universal Basic Income">UBI</abbr> as a means to an end, but that end has to be getting beyond the kind of civilization that forced us to invent a UBI in the first place. UBI is a band-aid on a broken system. Yes, it will make things better for the lower classes, but it won&rsquo;t do anything about <em>there even being lower classes at all</em>. Settling for a UBI is aiming too <em>low</em>. If we lived in a world where a UBI was possible, then much more would also be possible.</p>
<p>Still, I&rsquo;m not convinced we can afford the luxury of that fantasy. Without it, though, we&rsquo;re doomed to be highly diminished but we&rsquo;re determined to drive right into the brick wall without slowing down. We&rsquo;ve passed the point where we can have the nice version. That way is now blocked by past heedlessness and greed. We don&rsquo;t know how to slow down, so the only way forward is crash.</p>
<p>Since we&rsquo;ve overall stopped producing new things, we&rsquo;re stuck financializing everything and pushing money upward to a tiny elite. China grew, but it did so by cannibalizing existing markets, by <em>replacing</em> existing capacity. The standard productivity story is muddled by the fact that we&rsquo;re not really manufacturing goods anymore and have instead moved into pure services.</p>
<p>The current trend is to reimagine new territory in so-called metaverses. Instead of escaping the planet to travel to Mars, people are now just trying to escape anywhere, even virtual places. The clever ones are capitalizing on this to sell people nothing for something, transforming fairy tales into real assets and actually usable liquidity.</p>
<p>I&rsquo;ve included <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=4305">notes, citations and errata</a> in a separate post.</p>
</div></dd>
<dt class="field">What Every Programmer Should Know About Memory (2007)</dt>
<dd><div class=" "><p>by <em>Ulrich Drepper</em></p>
<p>This is a <a href="https://www.gwern.net/docs/cs/2007-drepper.pdf">114-page document</a> about various features of processor architectures and of programming languages and techniques that affect performance. It starts with a discussion of how memory (RAM or cache) even works, on an electrical level. How much maintenance overhead does a capacitor in a memory unit need in order to maintain its value? That is, there are cycles during which the RAM is refreshing its capacitance and cannot be read. If a processor request for that data comes at the wrong time, the reply will stall longer than usual.</p>
<p>This takes him into discussing processor caches and how and when data is retained or evicted. How can you align structures and data so that they fit into a cache line? How do you order operations so that a cache line can stay in the cache for as long as possible? What sort of eviction policies do processors even use? LRU? Something else? Can you control them? How do you avoid thrashing?</p>
<p>Next up is concurrency: when multiple processors, each with their own tier of caches, are working with the &ldquo;same&rdquo; memory, then they have to coordinate on cache evictions so that no processor is using stale data. The amount of coordination is incredible and an eviction becomes even more costly as the number of processors increases. Changing data in-memory becomes quite costly and should be avoided, if possible. At the very least, one should be aware of how much it costs to change memory. There might be simple things you can do at a high level of abstraction that makes it easier for the compiler to generate performant code for you.</p>
<p>I&rsquo;ve included <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=4301">notes, citations and errata</a> in a separate post.</p>
</div></dd>
<dt class="field">The Vital Abyss (2015)</dt>
<dd><div class=" "><p>by <em>James S.A. Corey</em></p>
<p>This story takes place after <cite>Abaddon&rsquo;s Gate</cite>. It tells the story of Paulo Cortázar, who started life as a somewhat gifted, but lazy student. He gets hooked on amphetamines during his latter years at university and manages to get his degree.</p>
<p>A mysterious corporation takes an interest in him, liking his seeming lack of scruples. This doesn&rsquo;t bother him at all. He takes the job and begins work at Thoth Station, working for ProtoGen, the Jules-Pierre Mao corporation that unleashed the protomolecule on Eros. That experiment was organized by Cortázar and his team of scientists. The scientists there have had all human empathy worn out of them; they are monsters, seeing only experimental opportunity where most people see fellow human beings. They are in love with the potential of the protomolecule and are more than arrogant enough to believe that they will be able to learn how it works and to control it.</p>
<p>This is the story of what happens to the staff. They are confined to a space station by the precursor to the Free Navy. They are all kept in a single, large, open room with little cover and little furniture, looked down upon by Belter guards. The do everything in the open and in public. The scientists without empathy—the most intelligent and ruthless ones—thrive the best. They openly scheme and openly copulate. Cortázar has a boyfriend whom he ends up betraying.</p>
<p>The renegade Martian contingent headed up by Duarte coerces the Belters into helping them find the most useful prisoner. They play mind games to get them to divulge information about the protomolecule. They slowly feed them information about what&rsquo;s happened with the Ring.</p>
<p>Cortázar has properly divined the purpose of the Ring and the meaning of the data. The Martians take him away to eventually take him to the planet that would become Laconia, where Cortázar would develop protomolecule technologies, breeding &ldquo;catalysts&rdquo; and working to grant Duarte immortality.</p>
<p>I&rsquo;ve included <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=4328">notes, citations and errata</a> in a separate post.</p>
</div></dd>
<dt class="field">Cibola Burn (2014)</dt>
<dd><div class=" "><p>by <em>James S.A. Corey</em></p>
<p>This is the fourth book in <cite>The Expanse</cite> series. It follows the <cite>Rocinante</cite> to a planet called <cite>Ilus</cite> (colonists) or <cite>New Terra</cite> (U.N.). The Roci is sent there by Avasarala and Fred Johnson to settle the dispute between colonists and the official science and security team sent by the U.N. </p>
<p>Basia Merton is a colonist, there with his wife Lucia, the colony&rsquo;s doctor and their daughter Felcia. The colonists are mainly Belters, who arrived on the <cite>Barbapiccola</cite>. They&rsquo;d managed to convert their bodies to be compatible with living on a planet and have started mining the planet&rsquo;s lithium. They think that they can stand on the law of &ldquo;first come, first served,&rdquo; but the U.N. is going to land and take everything away from them, claiming their right based on decisions and laws made in a complete other star system.</p>
<p>There are colonists who are unhappy enough with this situation to want to disable the landing pad. Basia is one of them. However, just as they&rsquo;ve set up the charges and primed them, they hear that the shuttle from the U.N. ship <cite>Edward Israel</cite> is coming early. The explosives go off just as the shuttle is trying to land and it crashes, killing most of the passengers.</p>
<p>Exozoologist Elvi Okoye is on the shuttle and survives the crash, as does geohydraulicist Fayez Sarkis. Soon after, the dangerous and deadly security chief Murtry comes down to the surface. After the colonists kill most of the remaining RCE security personnel, Murtry is in his element. He&rsquo;s ready to whip the colonists off of the planet and will feel justified in doing so by any means necessary. He will, in fact, enjoy doing so immensely. </p>
<p>I&rsquo;ve included <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=4306">notes, citations and errata</a> in a separate post.</p>
</div></dd>
<dt class="field">The Dying Animal (2001)</dt>
<dd><div class=" "><p>by <em>Philip Roth</em></p>
<p>To no-one’s surprise at all, this novel by Roth tells the story of a senior literature professor. His name is David Kepesh, but that doesn’t really matter. This is, apparently, the third in a series that started with The Breast. At least Roth is dead-honest about what he considers to be the most worthy literary subject of all time. It’s really hard not to feel that this is autobiographical to some degree. A Cuban-American named Consuela Castillo is taken one of his courses and she catches Kepesh’s roving eye. An equally apt title for this book could also have been Consuela’s Rack.</p>
<p>He laments the passing of a less-contentious world, one in which it was less a war between oppressed parties. But this world perhaps never existed. He makes a good argument that it did, for a while, but that it slipped away. True equality will have to wait, instead swaying to and fro between pendulum points, going to extremes on a spectrum, avoiding the plurality of territory between.</p>
<p>I don’t know what compulsion drove him to write this book, but I’m glad he did. I am not him, but there is enough of what he writes that rings a bit familiar, or is understandable (nachvollziehbar in German) that it’s nice to see a writer of his capability give voice to that which most would be too ashamed to admit, even in part. The beast lurks within. Taming it is a series of conscious acts we spend a lifetime trying to transform into unconscious ones.</p>
<p>I&rsquo;ve included <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=4317">notes, citations and errata</a> in a separate post.</p>
</div></dd>
<dt class="field">Nemesis Games (2015)</dt>
<dd><div class=" "><p>by <em>James S.A. Corey</em></p>
<p>This is the fifth book of the <cite>The Expanse</cite> series. The book starts with a Belter raid on a Martian base on Callisto. A 15-year-old named Filip leads the raid. He is forced to leave a man behind, but the mission is otherwise a success. The managed to capture the stealth shielding from the Martians and made it look like a botched raid on a different warehouse.</p>
<p>The Rocinante is back at Tycho Station, this time for half-year of repairs and upgrades. Amos heads to Earth to take care of an old friend’s affairs (Lydia has died). Alex heads for Mars to try to patch things up with his ex-wife. Naomi gets a message from the OPA that her son Filip is in trouble. She takes off without telling even Holden where she’s going. The crew is scattered to the winds. Holden remains behind, overseeing the repairs—and taking up tools himself to keep himself busy.</p>
<p>Bad things happen and the Free Navy and the rogue elements of the Martian Navy have gotten the drop on Sol System. Their overall plan is multi-pronged. Alex and Bobbie are detected and their ship disabled by the Free/Martian Navy. Holden and Fred are on the hunt for who’s a traitor on Tycho, but they eventually lose the protomolecule sample to an attack. Earth has been grievously wounded, half of Mars’s Navy is under Duarte’s control. The Belters are loose and causing trouble, Tycho is disabled, and Duarte has the protomolecule.</p>
<p>The crew of the <cite>Rocinante</cite> manages to save the day and get back together. Earth is picking up the pieces. The Free Navy takes over Medina Station, Duarte takes control of his ships and heads off for Laconia, but the Barkeith, the largest of the ships, disappears forever, going “Dutchman” in a mysterious event that seems to be swallowing some ships.</p>
<p>I&rsquo;ve included <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=4320">notes, citations and errata</a> in a separate post.</p>
</div></dd>
<dt class="field">Babylon&rsquo;s Ashes (2016)</dt>
<dd><div class=" "><p>by <em>James S.A. Corey</em></p>
<p>This is the sixth book of the The Expanse series. It starts with Marco Inaros and his Free Navy in charge of the Slow Zone and Medina Station in it. Michio Pa is at the heart of the small group of higher-ups in the Free Navy who are beginning to seriously doubt Marco’s qualifications and goals. Those goals always seem to change whenever Marco would have had to admit that he’d failed. He managed to destroy billions on Earth, but the blow strikes simultaneously at Belters because they still obtain most of their volatiles and food from Earth. All other operations have failed in one way or another.</p>
<p>Marco, meanwhile, is employing guerrilla tactics to leave as much territory and population to the “inners” as possible, to increase the burden of people under their care. It doesn’t occur to him that them taking care of these people will make his enemies look like the “good guys” to those people—including a lot of Belters.</p>
<p>The crew of the Rocinante is helping Earth and Mars pick up the pieces and fight the Free Navy. One part of the effort is to work with Monica on mini-documentaries highlighting the humanity of all people—to show Earthers and Belters that they’re all suffering. They hope to show them that they should band together against the guerrilla force that doesn’t seem to care about them—and that seems to be more pirate than government.</p>
<p>Naomi finally notices the pattern that explains all of the ships that went missing in transit, realizing that it is related to and/or caused by the cumulative energy levels of all simultaneous transits. She designs an attack on Marco that sends the Giambattista—filled with junk to increase its mass—through a gate at the same time that Marco’s 15 ships come through. Therewith they manage to force the energy level high enough to cause Marco’s ships to be swallowed up like all of the others.</p>
<p>I&rsquo;ve included <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=4325">notes, citations and errata</a> in a separate post.</p>
</div></dd>
<dt class="field">Strange Dogs (2017)</dt>
<dd><div class=" "><p>by <em>James S.A. Corey</em></p>
<p>A girl named Cara lives on a planet named Laconia with her parents, who are part of a research team. Laconia is one of the 1300 ring worlds discovered by humanity in The Expanse novels. Cara enjoys visiting a local pond, where she watches the strange and alien local fauna, in particular the sunbirds. At twilight, “strange dogs” show up, but seem to pose no risk.</p>
<p>One day, Cara feeds a bit of her own food to a sunbird. She saw someone do something similar with a duck in a book about Paris on Earth—all of which is completely alien to her. The sunbird chokes on the alien chemistry and dies. Its two children are left alone and cannot reach the nest. Distressed, Cara runs home to get her mother’s research drone, which she hopes to use to airlift the babies back to their nest. She fails, breaking the drone in the process.</p>
<p>The dogs return and leave with the sunbird mother’s corpse. The next day, the mama sunbird is back, but slightly altered. It’s alive, but no longer quite the same. The baby sunbirds interact with her just fine, though. Cara asks the dogs to repair the drone and they leave with it. The next day, the drone has been repaired as well.</p>
<p>Commandante Duarte has taken over the planet with his marines. One of the marines runs over Cara’s brother Xan. Duarte visits her family’s home to apologize and promise retribution. Cara sneaks Xan’s body away from the funeral and brings it to the dogs. The next morning, Xan is alive but, like the mama sunbird, a little off. Cara’s parents are repulsed by the reincarnation of Xan, with her father knifing him and barring him from the house. Cara sneaks out, finds Xan, and they head into the forest together, to seek refuge with the dogs.</p>
<p>I&rsquo;ve included <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=4295">notes, citations and errata</a> in a separate post.</p>
</div></dd>
<dt class="field">Oryx and Crake (2003)</dt>
<dd><div class=" "><p>by <em>Margaret Atwood</em></p>
<p>This is the first of three novels in the <cite>MaddAddam</cite> trilogy. This one tells the story of Snowman, a lone, somewhat mad, man living on his own in a post-apocalyptic world, nearly bereft of other human life. The only other &ldquo;people&rdquo; around are a tribe of pleasant, but simple humanoids that Snowman calls Crakers.</p>
<p>Snowman remembers a time when there were more people than just the Crakers. He remembers a time when the planet was controlled by supra-national corporations that ran privileged compounds for their employees. Everyone else—the Plebes—lived in lawless hinterlands, where the privileged went to play.</p>
<p>Snowman grew up as Jimmy, where his mother and father both worked for HelthWyzer, a company that bred animals for the express purpose of providing more plentiful and nutritious food. Jimmy befriends Glenn, a prodigy at his school. They spend most of their time playing video games and watching extreme pornography and snuff videos online. Jimmy falls in love with one of the young, Asian girls in one of these films. The girl is Oryx. </p>
<p>Crake is good enough at building stuff his company wants that he&rsquo;s also able to produce his Crakers as well as a product called BlyssPluss, which is touted as a sexual super-pill but additionally sterilizes its users (to control the population of the most dangerous species). Crake hires Jimmy to market it, but the pill is basically so awesome that is markets itself. Crake just wants Jimmy close by for the endgame of his master plan.</p>
<p>Crake&rsquo;s master plan involves getting rid of humanity.</p>
<p>I&rsquo;ve included <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=4338">notes, citations and errata</a> in a separate post.</p>
</div></dd>
<dt class="field">The Boys (2006–2012)</dt>
<dd><div class=" "><p>by <em>Garth Ennis &amp; Darick Robertson</em></p>
<p>The Boys is a story about a world with super-powered beings (“supes”). This is not unusual for comic books, or graphic novels. The distinction is that this story doesn’t make a distinction between superheroes and supervillains. It doesn’t believe that superheroes exist. Or it grudgingly concedes that some super-powered beings seem not to take advantage of their powers for personal gain. The only example of a high-level super-powered being who does so is Annie.</p>
<p>The story starts with Hughie, whose girlfriend is slaughtered by accident by the super-powered A-Train, one of Vought’s Seven. The Seven are the pinnacle of the supe pyramid, at the top of the media and publicity and merchandising and franchising game. It’s all about money, money and power. The supes are a decadent lot, depicting in loving detail in these books, with lots of sex and violence.</p>
<p>I&rsquo;ve included <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=4263">notes, citations and errata</a> in a separate post.</p>
</div></dd>
<dt class="field">Eva (1997–1998)</dt>
<dd><div class=" "><p>by <em>Claude Jaermann &amp; Felix Schaad</em></p>
<p>Eva Grjdic works at Cosmos, a grocery-store chain à la Migros.</p>
<p>The art style reminds me very much of my well-worn and beloved Mad magazines that I spent my youth reading. It is, perhaps, closest to Mort Drucker, with a bit of Sergio Aragones mixed in. The text is brilliant. It&rsquo;s subversive, it&rsquo;s so very Swiss. The context is so very Swiss. You won&rsquo;t be able to really understand this comic unless you live here or lived her at that time.</p>
<p>Eva is dirt poor and barely makes ends meet in a country otherwise overflowing with wealth. She&rsquo;s on welfare, but eventually ends up living in a shipping container right next to Cosmos, and the rent &ldquo;ziehen wir Ihnen wird der Einfachheit halber direkt am Lohn ab&rdquo;. Then they lose welfare because it looks like they no longer pay rent.</p>
<p>The social worker is happy to make an &ldquo;arrangement&rdquo; with Eva&rsquo;s daughter, though. Things continue in this vein.</p>
<p>I&rsquo;ve included <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=4342">notes, citations and errata</a> in a separate post.</p>
</div></dd>
<dt class="field">The Year of the Flood (2009)</dt>
<dd><div class=" "><p>by <em>Margaret Atwood</em></p>
<p>This is the second of three novels in the <cite>MaddAddam</cite> trilogy. The events in this book cover the same time frame as the <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=4338">first novel</a>, but from the points of view of different characters. In that novel, we read about a girl named Bernice that Jimmy knew at the Martha-Graham Academy they both attended. She was a God&rsquo;s Gardener. In this book, we learn more about her and much more about the Gardeners.</p>
<p>The mythology of the Gardeners is quite scientific. They are highly self-sufficient and very ascetic. Their lifestyle is a combination of vegan, Amish, eco-warrior, rationalist, but also religious. An interesting balance, to say the least. My hat is off to Ms. Atwood, once again.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Do we deserve this Love by which God maintains our Cosmos? Do we deserve it as a Species? We have taken the World given to us and carelessly destroyed its fabric and its Creatures. Other religions have taught that this World is to be rolled up like a scroll and burnt to nothingness, and that a new Heaven and a new Earth will then appear. But why would God give us another Earth when we have mistreated this one so badly? No, my Friends. It is not this Earth that is to be demolished: it is the Human Species. Perhaps God will create another, more compassionate race to take our place.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 508</div></div><p>They have a whole pantheon of saints and holidays based on environmentally conscious people like Rachel Carson and Dian Fossey, but also on explorers like Ernest Shackleton. They predict a &ldquo;waterless flood&rdquo;, which comes in the form of Crake&rsquo;s virus.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;This was not an ordinary pandemic: it wouldn’t be contained after a few hundred thousand deaths, then obliterated with biotools and bleach. This was the Waterless Flood the Gardeners so often had warned about. It had all the signs: it travelled through the air as if on wings, it burned through cities like fire, spreading germ-ridden mobs, terror, and butchery. The lights were going out everywhere, the news was sporadic: systems were failing as their keepers died.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 24</div></div><p>The story focuses on Toby, a young woman forced to rely on herself very early in life, after having lost her parents to some sort of unclear, corporate debacle. She ends up working at an off-grid fast-food place in the Pleeblands. Simultaneously, she&rsquo;s more-or-less enslaved to Blanco, the owner of the restaurant and psychotic leader of a small gang that rapes and plunders as it pleases. She is rescued by the God&rsquo;s Gardeners and whisked away to safety in a rooftop garden called Edencliff.</p>
<p>I&rsquo;ve included <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=4364">notes, citations and errata</a> in a separate post.</p>
</div></dd>
</dl>      </div>
      </div>
        <div class="footer">
    <div class="footer-data"><div class="footer-links"><ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/contact.php" title="">Contact</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/support.php" title="">Support</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/privacy.php" title="">Privacy</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/rights.php" title="">Rights</a></li></ul></div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="copyright">Copyright (c) 1999-2026 earthli.com. All Rights Reserved.</div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="versions">Powered by <ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore/app_news.php">earthli News 3.7</a></li><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore" title="">earthli WebCore&trade; 3.7</a></li></ul></div></div>    </div>
      </div>
  </div>  </body>
</html>
]]>
  </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
      <title type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[Eva by Claude Jaermann & Felix Schaad (1997--1998) (read in 2021)]]>
  </title>
    <id>https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=4342</id>
    <link href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=4342"/>
    <updated>2022-02-18T23:40:49+01:00</updated>
    <author>
        <name type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[Marco von Ballmoos]]>
  </name>
      <uri>https://earthli.com/users/marco</uri>
    </author>
      <summary type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<p><small class="notes">Standard disclaimer [1]</small></p>
<p>Eva Grjdic works at Cosmos, a grocery-store chain à la Migros.</p>
<p>The art style reminds me very much of my well-worn and beloved Mad magazines that I spent my youth reading. It is, perhaps, closest to Mort Drucker, with a bit of Sergio Aragones mixed in. The text is brilliant.... [<a class="complete-text-link" href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=4342">More</a>]</p>
]]>
  </summary>
      <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<html lang="en">
  <head>
    <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/themes/ice.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/fonts/raleway.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/core/medium.css">
  </head>
  <body>
<div class="style-controls">  <div class="page">
    <div class="page-body">
<div class="info-box-top">
<p>
Published by <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_user.php?name=marco" title="Marco von Ballmoos" class="visible">marco</a> on <span class="date-time">18. Feb 2022 23:40:49 (GMT-5)</span>
</p>
</div>
      <div class="text-flow wide">
  <p><small class="notes">Standard disclaimer [1]</small></p>
<p>Eva Grjdic works at Cosmos, a grocery-store chain à la Migros.</p>
<p>The art style reminds me very much of my well-worn and beloved Mad magazines that I spent my youth reading. It is, perhaps, closest to Mort Drucker, with a bit of Sergio Aragones mixed in. The text is brilliant. It&rsquo;s subversive, it&rsquo;s so very Swiss. The context is so very Swiss. You won&rsquo;t be able to really get this comic unless you live here or lived her at that time.</p>
<p>Eva is dirt poor and barely makes ends meet in a country otherwise overflowing with wealth. She&rsquo;s on welfare, but eventually ends up living in a shipping container right next to Cosmos, and the rent &ldquo;ziehen wir Ihnen wird der Einfachheit halber direkt am Lohn ab&rdquo;. Then they lose welfare because it looks like they no longer pay rent.</p>
<p>The social worker is happy to make an &ldquo;arrangement&rdquo; with Eva&rsquo;s daughter, though.</p>
<p>See <a href="https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eva_(Comic)">Eva (Comic)</a> (<cite><a href="http://de.wikipedia.org/">Wikipedia</a></cite>) for more information.</p>
<p><hr></p>
<div class="footnote-reference"><span id="footnote_DRAFTABLE_ENTRY_4342_1_body" class="footnote-number">[1]</span> Disclaimer: these are notes I took while reading this book. They include citations I found interesting or enlightening or particularly well-written. In some cases, I&rsquo;ve pointed out which of these applies to which citation; in others, I have not. Any benefit you gain from reading these notes is purely incidental to the purpose they serve of reminding me of what I once read. Please see Wikipedia for a summary if I&rsquo;ve failed to provide one sufficient for your purposes. If my notes serve to trigger an interest in this book, then I&rsquo;m happy for you.</div><h2>Citations</h2>      </div>
      </div>
        <div class="footer">
    <div class="footer-data"><div class="footer-links"><ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/contact.php" title="">Contact</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/support.php" title="">Support</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/privacy.php" title="">Privacy</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/rights.php" title="">Rights</a></li></ul></div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="copyright">Copyright (c) 1999-2026 earthli.com. All Rights Reserved.</div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="versions">Powered by <ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore/app_news.php">earthli News 3.7</a></li><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore" title="">earthli WebCore&trade; 3.7</a></li></ul></div></div>    </div>
      </div>
  </div>  </body>
</html>
]]>
  </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
      <title type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[The Year of the Flood by Margaret Atwood (2009) (read in 2021)]]>
  </title>
    <id>https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=4364</id>
    <link href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=4364"/>
    <updated>2022-02-18T23:40:15+01:00</updated>
    <author>
        <name type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[Marco von Ballmoos]]>
  </name>
      <uri>https://earthli.com/users/marco</uri>
    </author>
      <summary type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<p><small class="notes">Standard disclaimer [1]</small></p>
<p>This is the second of three novels in the <cite>MaddAddam</cite> trilogy. The events in this book cover the same time frame as the <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=4338">first novel</a>, but from the points of view of different characters. In that novel, we read about a girl named Bernice that Jimmy knew at the Martha-Graham Academy... [<a class="complete-text-link" href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=4364">More</a>]</p>
]]>
  </summary>
      <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<html lang="en">
  <head>
    <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/themes/ice.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/fonts/raleway.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/core/medium.css">
  </head>
  <body>
<div class="style-controls">  <div class="page">
    <div class="page-body">
<div class="info-box-top">
<p>
Published by <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_user.php?name=marco" title="Marco von Ballmoos" class="visible">marco</a> on <span class="date-time">18. Feb 2022 23:40:15 (GMT-5)</span>
</p>
</div>
      <div class="text-flow wide">
  <p><small class="notes">Standard disclaimer [1]</small></p>
<p>This is the second of three novels in the <cite>MaddAddam</cite> trilogy. The events in this book cover the same time frame as the <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=4338">first novel</a>, but from the points of view of different characters. In that novel, we read about a girl named Bernice that Jimmy knew at the Martha-Graham Academy they both attended. She was a God&rsquo;s Gardener. In this book, we learn more about her and much more about the Gardeners.</p>
<p>The mythology of the Gardeners is quite scientific. They are highly self-sufficient and very ascetic. Their lifestyle is a combination of vegan, Amish, eco-warrior, rationalist, but also religious. An interesting balance, to say the least. My hat is off to Ms. Atwood, once again.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Do we deserve this Love by which God maintains our Cosmos? Do we deserve it as a Species? We have taken the World given to us and carelessly destroyed its fabric and its Creatures. Other religions have taught that this World is to be rolled up like a scroll and burnt to nothingness, and that a new Heaven and a new Earth will then appear. But why would God give us another Earth when we have mistreated this one so badly? No, my Friends. It is not this Earth that is to be demolished: it is the Human Species. Perhaps God will create another, more compassionate race to take our place.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 508</div></div><p>They have a whole pantheon of saints and holidays based on environmentally conscious people like Rachel Carson and Dian Fossey, but also on explorers like Ernest Shackleton. They predict a &ldquo;waterless flood&rdquo;, which comes in the form of Crake&rsquo;s virus.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;This was not an ordinary pandemic: it wouldn’t be contained after a few hundred thousand deaths, then obliterated with biotools and bleach. This was the Waterless Flood the Gardeners so often had warned about. It had all the signs: it travelled through the air as if on wings, it burned through cities like fire, spreading germ-ridden mobs, terror, and butchery. The lights were going out everywhere, the news was sporadic: systems were failing as their keepers died.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 24</div></div><p>The story focuses on Toby, a young woman forced to rely on herself very early in life, after having lost her parents to some sort of unclear, corporate debacle. She ends up working at an off-grid fast-food place in the Pleeblands. Simultaneously, she&rsquo;s more-or-less enslaved to Blanco, the owner of the restaurant and psychotic leader of a small gang that rapes and plunders as it pleases. She is rescued by the God&rsquo;s Gardeners and whisked away to safety in a rooftop garden called Edencliff.</p>
<p>Although at first skeptical, Toby becomes a reliable acolyte of the Gardeners, rising in Adam One&rsquo;s esteem. The beginnings and ends of chapters are filled with sermons and parables and aphorisms of Adam One and others.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;When the small creatures hush their singing, said Adam One, it’s because they’re afraid. You must listen for the sound of their fear.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 6</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Adam One sighed. “We should not expect too much from faith,” he said. “Human understanding is fallible, and we see through a glass, darkly. Any religion is a shadow of God. But the shadows of God are not God.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 201</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;We should not have allowed Melissa to lag so far behind us. Via the conduit of a wild dog pack, she has now made the ultimate Gift to her fellow Creatures, and has become part of God’s great dance of proteins. Put Light around her in your hearts. Let us sing.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 486</div></div><p>&ldquo;Let us sing&rdquo; ends every chapter.</p>
<p>The world outside is increasingly incomprehensible—not unlike our own.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;And the Internet was such a jumble of false and true factoids that no one believed what was on it any more, or else they believed all of it, which amounted to the same thing.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 350</div></div><p>Toby gets to know Ren, a young girl who&rsquo;d been taken in with her mother Lucerne, who&rsquo;s taken up with Zeb, a charismatic but somewhat rogue member of the Gardeners (he doesn&rsquo;t have an Adam or Eve designation).</p>
<p>Ren (short for Brenda) is friends with Amanda and Bernice (both of whom would later date Jimmy (Snowman) at one point or another). Ren meets Jimmy as well, when she&rsquo;s forced to return to civilization when her mother flakes out and abandons the Gardeners. She also meets Glenn (Crake), introducing him to God&rsquo;s Gardeners, in which he is very interested (it&rsquo;s part of his master plan, of course).</p>
<p>Much later, Ren attends Martha-Graham academy, meeting Bernice and Jimmy again, but  eventually drops out of Martha Graham and is forced to take a job dancing in a club (the Scales and Tails, where all of the girls dress up as animals) in Pleebland. She&rsquo;s relatively well-cared-for there, and is in a hermetic containment unit at the club when the virus hits really hard and wipes out everyone else. Unfortunately, she&rsquo;s also stuck there, running low on supplies. Amanda travels across the country to rescue her and they make their way out of there.</p>
<p>Toby meanwhile, is back in trouble with Blanco, who tracks her down to the Gardeners. <br>
She is forced to flee back to civilization, taking up a position at Anooyoo Spa, where she is transformed with plastic surgery. Lucerne doesn&rsquo;t even recognize her when she comes in for treatments. When the virus hits, Toby is also safe and barricaded there, foraging and reverting to her Gardener/Eve persona.</p>
<p>Blanco and two other evil men have escaped the Painball arena where they&rsquo;d been imprisoned and forced to compete in deadly games for sport.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Some teams would hang their kill on a tree, some would mutilate the body. Cut off the head, tear out the heart and kidneys. That was to intimidate the other team. Eat part of it, if food was running low or just to show how mean you were. After a while, thought Toby, you wouldn’t just cross the line, you’d forget there ever were any lines. You’d do whatever it takes.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 118</div></div><p>They track down Toby, who&rsquo;d joined back up with Ren and Amanda. Blanco and co. drag off Ren and Amanda, while Toby manages to join back up with Zeb and other gardeners who&rsquo;ve managed to survive and make a home away from Edencliff.</p>
<p>Toby is determined to save Amanda and Ren. She shoots Blanco in the leg and rescues Ren, but poor Amanda is left with the evil trio. Toby tracks them down and finds Blanco feverish and damaged, but dangerous as a cornered rat, tied up by his friends, who have abandoned him. She poisons him and finally manages to leave him in her rear-view mirror. She lights out in pursuit of Amanda and her two captors.</p>
<p>She sneaks through the forest, creeping up on the same campfire onto which Jimmy/Snowman stumbled at the end of <cite>Oryx and Crake</cite>: the three people that Snowman saw are actually the two fugitives and Amanda. Amanda is in bad shape, but manages to distract them long enough for Snowman and Toby to incapacitate them. More people are heard approaching—presumably to be explained in the third volume.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>We dangle by a flimsy thread,<br>
Our little lives are grains of sand:<br>
The Cosmos is a tiny sphere<br>
Held in the hollow of God’s hand. Give up your anger and your spite,<br>
And imitate the Deer, the Tree;<br>
In sweet Forgiveness find your joy,<br>
For it alone can set you free.</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 511</div></div><p><hr></p>
<div class="footnote-reference"><span id="footnote_DRAFTABLE_ENTRY_4364_1_body" class="footnote-number">[1]</span> Disclaimer: these are notes I took while reading this book. They include citations I found interesting or enlightening or particularly well-written. In some cases, I&rsquo;ve pointed out which of these applies to which citation; in others, I have not. Any benefit you gain from reading these notes is purely incidental to the purpose they serve of reminding me of what I once read. Please see Wikipedia for a summary if I&rsquo;ve failed to provide one sufficient for your purposes. If my notes serve to trigger an interest in this book, then I&rsquo;m happy for you.</div><h2>Citations</h2><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;When the small creatures hush their singing, said Adam One, it’s because they’re afraid. You must listen for the sound of their fear.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 6</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;We shouldn’t have been so scornful; we should have had compassion. But compassion takes work, and we were young.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 9</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;They’re a quarter of the way across the meadow when it occurs to her they’ll be back. They’ll dig under at night and root up her garden in no time flat, and that will be the end of her long-term food supply. She’ll have to shoot them, it’s self-defence. She squeezes off a round, misses, tries again. The boar falls down. The two sows keep running. Only when they’ve reached the forest rim do they turn and look back. Then they meld with the foliage and are gone.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 22</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;This was not an ordinary pandemic: it wouldn’t be contained after a few hundred thousand deaths, then obliterated with biotools and bleach. This was the Waterless Flood the Gardeners so often had warned about. It had all the signs: it travelled through the air as if on wings, it burned through cities like fire, spreading germ-ridden mobs, terror, and butchery. The lights were going out everywhere, the news was sporadic: systems were failing as their keepers died.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 24</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;No doctor could give her a diagnosis, though many tests were done by the HelthWyzer Corp clinics; they took an interest because she’d been such a faithful user of their products. They arranged for special care, with their own doctors. They charged for it, though, and even with the discount for members of the HelthWyzer Franchise Family it was a lot of money; and because the condition had no name, her parents’ modest health insurance plan refused to cover the costs. Nobody could get public wellness coverage unless they had no money of their own whatsoever.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 31</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Already, back then, the CorpSeCorps were consolidating their power. They’d started as a private security firm for the Corporations, but then they’d taken over when the local police forces collapsed for lack of funding, and people liked that at first because the Corporations paid, but now CorpSeCorps were sending their tentacles everywhere.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 30</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;She’d burned her identity and didn’t have the cash to buy a new one — not even a cheap one, without the DNA infusion or the skin-colour change — so she couldn’t get a legitimate job: those were mostly controlled by the Corporations. But if you sank deep down — down where names disappeared and no histories were true — the CorpSeCorps wouldn’t bother with you.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 36</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;“You’ll want to grow your hair,” said Nuala. “Get rid of that scalped look. We Gardener women all wear our hair long.” When Toby asked why, she was given to understand that the aesthetic preference was God’s. This kind of smiling, bossy sanctimoniousness was a little too pervasive for Toby, especially among the female members of the sect.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 55</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;“It would be bad for their image to eviscerate anything with God in its name,” said Adam One. “The Corporations wouldn’t approve of it, considering the influence of the Petrobaptists and the Known Fruits among them. They claim to respect the Spirit and to favour religious toleration, as long as the religions don’t take to blowing things up: they have an aversion to the destruction of private property.”</p>
<p>&ldquo;“They can’t possibly like us,” said Toby.</p>
<p>&ldquo;“Of course not,” said Adam One. “They view us as twisted fanatics who combine food extremism with bad fashion sense and a puritanical attitude towards shopping. But we own nothing they want, so we don’t qualify as terrorists.&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 58</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;But we affirm, also, the Divine agency that has caused us to be created in the way that we were, and this has enraged those scientific fools who say in their hearts, “There is no God.” These claim to prove the non-existence of God because they cannot put Him in a test tube and weigh and measure Him.</p>
<p>&ldquo;But God is pure Spirit; so how can anyone reason that the failure to measure the Immeasurable proves its non-existence? God is indeed the No Thing, the Nothingness, that through which and by which all material things exist; for if there were not such a Nothingness, existence would be so crammed full of materiality that no one thing could be distinguished from another. The mere existence of separate material things is a proof of the Nothingness of God.</p>
<p>&ldquo;Where were the scientific fools when God laid the foundations of the Earth by interposing his own Spirit between one blob of matter and another, thus giving rise to forms?&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 62</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;They looked as if they already owned everything from every single store and were bored with it. I envied that look so much. I just stood there, envying.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 87</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;“How do they stay alive in there?” She pointed to the silver knob where the bracelet fastened.</p>
<p>&ldquo;“This is an aerator,” she said. “It pumps in oxygen. You add the food twice a week.”</p>
<p>&ldquo;“What happens if you forget?”</p>
<p>&ldquo;“They eat each other,” said Amanda. She gave a little smile. “Some kids do that on purpose, they don’t add the food. Then it’s like a miniwar in there, and after a while there’s just one jellyfish left, and then it dies.”</p>
<p>&ldquo;“That’s horrible,” I said.</p>
<p>&ldquo;Amanda kept the same smile. “Yeah. That’s why they do it.”&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 88</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;May God deliver us from the snare of the fowler, and cover us with his feathers, and under his wings may we trust, as it says in Psalm 91; and thou shalt not be afraid of the pestilence that walketh in darkness, nor for the destruction that wasteth at noonday. May I remind you all about the importance of hand-washing, seven times a day at least, and after every encounter with a stranger. It is never too early to practise this essential precaution. Avoid anyone who is sneezing. Let us sing.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 110</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;“Who lives here?” she says out loud. Not me, she thinks. This thing I’m doing can hardly be called living. Instead I’m lying dormant, like a bacterium in a glacier. Getting time over with. That’s all.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 113</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Some teams would hang their kill on a tree, some would mutilate the body. Cut off the head, tear out the heart and kidneys. That was to intimidate the other team. Eat part of it, if food was running low or just to show how mean you were. After a while, thought Toby, you wouldn’t just cross the line, you’d forget there ever were any lines. You’d do whatever it takes.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 118</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Thus the time passed. Toby stopped counting it. In any case, time is not a thing that passes, said Pilar: it’s a sea on which you float.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 121</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;“Now, promise me that you will never take any pill made by a Corporation. Never buy such a pill, and never accept any such pill if offered, no matter what they say. They’ll produce data and scientists; they’ll produce doctors — worthless, they’ve all been bought.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 125</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;It was true that the Gardeners didn’t look down on Lucerne, or not for the reasons she thought they did. They might resent the way she slacked off on chores and could never learn how to chop a carrot, they might be scornful of the messiness of her living space and her pathetic attempt at windowsill tomato-growing and the amount of time she spent in bed, but they didn’t care about her infidelity, or her adultery, or whatever it had once been called.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 137</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Why do we want other people to like us, even if we don’t really care about them all that much? I don’t know why, but it’s true. I found myself standing there and smelling all those smells, and hoping a lot that Shackie and Croze thought I was pretty.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 185</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;I don’t know how long all of that lasted because time was like rubber, it stretched out like a long, long elastic rope or a huge piece of chewing gum. Then it snapped shut into a tiny black square and I passed out.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 187</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;I point no fingers, for I know not where to point; but as we have just seen, malicious rumours can spread confusion. A careless remark can be as the cigarette butt casually tossed into the dumpster, smouldering until it bursts into flame and engulfs a neighbourhood. Do guard your words in future.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 191</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;While the Flood rages, you must count the days, said Adam One. You must observe the risings of the Sun and the changings of the Moon, because to everything there is a season. On your Meditations, do not travel so far on your inner journeys that you enter the Timeless before it is time. In your Fallow states, do not descend to a level that is too deep for any resurgence, or the Night will come in which all hours are the same to you, and then there will be no Hope.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 195</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Adam One sighed. “We should not expect too much from faith,” he said. “Human understanding is fallible, and we see through a glass, darkly. Any religion is a shadow of God. But the shadows of God are not God.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 201</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;[…] how ruthlessly Bernice had been shouldered aside, once Amanda had appeared on the scene. They think we don’t see them, thought Toby. They think we don’t know what they’re up to. Their snobberies, their cruelties, their schemes.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 211</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;I can&rsquo;t stand this, she thought. I’m killing her. No: I’m helping her to die. I’m fulfilling her wishes. She watched as Pilar drank. “Thank you for learning,”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 215</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;“Thank you for all you’ve taught me,” said Toby. I can’t stand this, she thought. I’m killing her. No: I’m helping her to die. I’m fulfilling her wishes. She watched as Pilar drank.</p>
<p>&ldquo;“Thank you for learning,” said Pilar. “I’m going to sleep now. Don’t forget to tell the bees.”&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 215</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Final self-journeying is a moral option only for the experienced and, I have to say, only for the terminally ill, as Pilar was; but it’s not one we should make widely available — especially not to our young people, who are impressionable and prone to indulge in morbid sulking and false heroics. I trust you’ve taken charge of those medicine bottles of Pilar’s? We wouldn’t want any accidents.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 217</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;On April Fish Day, which originated in France, we make fun of one another by attaching a Fish of paper, or, in our case, a Fish of recycled cloth, to the back of another person and then crying out, “April Fish!” Or, in the original French, “Poisson d’Avril!” In anglophone countries, this day is known as April Fool’s Day. But April Fish was surely first a Christian festival, as a Fish image was used by the early Christians as secret signals of their faith in times of oppression.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 234</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The Serpent is wise in that it lives in immediacy, without the need for the elaborate intellectual frameworks Humankind is endlessly constructing for itself. For what in us is belief and faith, in the other Creatures is inborn knowledge.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 279</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;We cannot know God by reason and measurement; indeed, excess reason and measurement lead to doubt. Through them, we know that Comets and nuclear holocausts are among the possible tomorrows, not to mention the Waterless Flood, that we fear looms ever nearer. This fear dilutes our certainty, and through that channel comes loss of Faith; and then the temptation to enact malevolence enters our Souls; for if annihilation awaits us, why bother to strive for the Good?&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 279</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;We’re using up the Earth. It’s almost gone. You can’t live with such fears and keep on whistling. The waiting builds up in you like a tide. You start wanting it to be done with. You find yourself saying to the sky, Just do it. Do your worst. Get it over with. She could feel the coming tremor of it running through her spine, asleep or awake. It never went away, even among the Gardeners. Especially — as time wore on — among the Gardeners.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 285</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;That would be putting the cart before the horse, said Adam One; they could not achieve their goal of reconciling the findings of Science with their sacramental view of Life simply by overriding the rules of the former. He asked them to ponder this conundrum, and propose solutions at a later date.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 287</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;The strictly materialist view — that we’re an experiment animal protein has been doing on itself — is far too harsh and lonely for most, and leads to nihilism. That being the case, we need to push popular sentiment in a biosphere-friendly direction by pointing out the hazards of annoying God by a violation of His trust in our stewardship.”</p>
<p>&ldquo;“What you mean is, with God in the story there’s a penalty,” said Toby.</p>
<p>&ldquo;“Yes,” said Adam One. “There’s a penalty without God in the story too, needless to say. But people are less likely to credit that. If there’s a penalty, they want a penalizer. They dislike senseless catastrophe.”&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 287</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The Hammerhead paced the floor and gnawed her fingernails until Toby felt like hitting her. We didn’t ask you to come here and put all our necks in a noose over a teaspoonful of stale-dated crap, she wanted to say. In the end she gave the woman some chamomile tea with Poppy in it, just to take her off the airwaves.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 296</div></div><p>The Hammerhead is Jimmy&rsquo;s mother.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;“Our role in respect to the Creatures is to bear witness,” said Adam One. “And to guard the memories and the genomes of the departed. You can’t fight blood with blood. I thought we’d agreed on that.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 300</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;“Be of good cheer,” he said. “Nothing bad will be done to you.” But since Adam One thought that even the most terrible things happened for ultimately excellent though unfathomable reasons, Toby did not find this reassuring.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 301</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;And the Internet was such a jumble of false and true factoids that no one believed what was on it any more, or else they believed all of it, which amounted to the same thing.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 350</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Any death is stupid from the viewpoint of whoever is undergoing it, Adam One used to say, because no matter how much you’ve been warned, Death always comes without knocking. Why now? is the cry. Why so soon? It’s the cry of a child being called home at dusk, it’s the universal protest against Time.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 391</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Adam One would say that Ren is a precious gift that has been given to Toby so that Toby may demonstrate unselfishness and sharing and those higher qualities the Gardeners had been so eager to bring out in her. Toby can’t quite see it that way, not at the moment. But she’ll have to keep trying.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 428</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Some will tell you Love is merely chemical, my Friends, said Adam One. Of course it is chemical: where would any of us be without chemistry? But Science is merely one way of describing the world. Another way of describing it would be to say: where would any of us be without Love?&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 429</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Saints Shackleton and Crozier, of Antarctic and Arctic fame; and Saint Laurence “Titus” Oates of the Scott Expedition, who hiked where no man had ever hiked before, and who sacrificed himself during a blizzard for the welfare of his companions. Let his immortal last words be an inspiration to us on our journey: “I am just going outside and may be some time.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 486</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;We should not have allowed Melissa to lag so far behind us. Via the conduit of a wild dog pack, she has now made the ultimate Gift to her fellow Creatures, and has become part of God’s great dance of proteins. Put Light around her in your hearts. Let us sing.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 486 by <cite>Adam One</cite></div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Are the new people Your idea of an improved model? Is this what the first Adam was supposed to be? Will they replace us? Or do You intend to shrug your shoulders and carry on with the present human race? If so, you’ve chosen some odd marbles: a clutch of one-time scientists, a handful of renegade Gardeners, two psychotics on the loose with a nearly dead woman. It’s hardly the survival of the fittest, except for Zeb; but even Zeb’s tired.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 497</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Do we deserve this Love by which God maintains our Cosmos? Do we deserve it as a Species? We have taken the World given to us and carelessly destroyed its fabric and its Creatures. Other religions have taught that this World is to be rolled up like a scroll and burnt to nothingness, and that a new Heaven and a new Earth will then appear. But why would God give us another Earth when we have mistreated this one so badly? No, my Friends. It is not this Earth that is to be demolished: it is the Human Species. Perhaps God will create another, more compassionate race to take our place.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 508</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;For the Waterless Flood has swept over us — not as a vast hurricane, not as a barrage of comets, not as a cloud of poisonous gasses. No: as we suspected for so long, it is a plague — a plague that infects no Species but our own, and that will leave all other Creatures untouched. Our cities are darkened, our lines of communication are no more.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 509</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;But let our going out be brave and joyous! Let us end with a prayer for All Souls. Among these are the Souls of those who have persecuted us; those who have murdered God’s Creatures, and extinguished His Species; those who have tortured in the name of Law; who have worshipped nothing but riches; and who, to gain wealth and worldly power, have inflicted pain and death.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 509</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>We dangle by a flimsy thread,<br>
Our little lives are grains of sand:<br>
The Cosmos is a tiny sphere<br>
Held in the hollow of God’s hand. Give up your anger and your spite,<br>
And imitate the Deer, the Tree;<br>
In sweet Forgiveness find your joy,<br>
For it alone can set you free.</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 511</div></div>      </div>
      </div>
        <div class="footer">
    <div class="footer-data"><div class="footer-links"><ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/contact.php" title="">Contact</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/support.php" title="">Support</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/privacy.php" title="">Privacy</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/rights.php" title="">Rights</a></li></ul></div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="copyright">Copyright (c) 1999-2026 earthli.com. All Rights Reserved.</div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="versions">Powered by <ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore/app_news.php">earthli News 3.7</a></li><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore" title="">earthli WebCore&trade; 3.7</a></li></ul></div></div>    </div>
      </div>
  </div>  </body>
</html>
]]>
  </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
      <title type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[Oryx and Crake by Margaret Atwood (2003) (read in 2021)]]>
  </title>
    <id>https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=4338</id>
    <link href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=4338"/>
    <updated>2022-02-17T22:50:24+01:00</updated>
    <author>
        <name type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[Marco von Ballmoos]]>
  </name>
      <uri>https://earthli.com/users/marco</uri>
    </author>
      <summary type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<p><small class="notes">Standard disclaimer [1]</small></p>
<p>This is the first of three novels in the <cite>MaddAddam</cite> trilogy. This one tells the story of Snowman, a lone, somewhat mad, man living on his own in a post-apocalyptic world, nearly bereft of other human life. The only other &ldquo;people&rdquo; around are a tribe of pleasant, but simple... [<a class="complete-text-link" href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=4338">More</a>]</p>
]]>
  </summary>
      <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<html lang="en">
  <head>
    <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/themes/ice.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/fonts/raleway.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/core/medium.css">
  </head>
  <body>
<div class="style-controls">  <div class="page">
    <div class="page-body">
<div class="info-box-top">
<p>
Published by <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_user.php?name=marco" title="Marco von Ballmoos" class="visible">marco</a> on <span class="date-time">17. Feb 2022 22:50:24 (GMT-5)</span>
</p>
</div>
      <div class="text-flow wide">
  <p><small class="notes">Standard disclaimer [1]</small></p>
<p>This is the first of three novels in the <cite>MaddAddam</cite> trilogy. This one tells the story of Snowman, a lone, somewhat mad, man living on his own in a post-apocalyptic world, nearly bereft of other human life. The only other &ldquo;people&rdquo; around are a tribe of pleasant, but simple humanoids that Snowman calls Crakers.</p>
<p>Snowman remembers a time when there were more people than just the Crakers. He remembers a time when the planet was controlled by supra-national corporations that ran privileged compounds for their employees. Everyone else—the Plebes—lived in lawless hinterlands, where the privileged went to play.</p>
<p>Snowman grew up as Jimmy, where his mother and father both worked for HelthWyzer, a company that bred animals for the express purpose of providing more plentiful and nutritious food. Jimmy&rsquo;s mother had quit her job and spent all day sitting around the house, smoking and drinking and being snarky. His father had an affair and continued to climb the corporate ladder. Jimmy&rsquo;s mother just disappears one day, leaving him with his father and his father&rsquo;s mistress.</p>
<p>Jimmy befriends Glenn, a prodigy at his school. They spend most of their time playing video games and watching extreme pornography and snuff videos online.  Atwood describes this in lurid detail.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;They were in Jimmy’s bedroom, lying on the bed together with the digital TV on, hooked into his computer, some copulation Web site with an animal component, a couple of well-trained German shepherds and a double-jointed ultra-shaved albino tattooed all over with lizards. The sound was off, it was just the pictures: erotic wallpaper.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 370</div></div><p>Jimmy falls in love with one of the young, Asian girls in one of these films. The girl is Oryx. The world that created Oryx is cruel, with an underlying calculus that is incomprehensible to the more privileged.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The children were being trained to earn their living in the wide world: this was the gloss put on it. Besides, if they stayed where they were, what was there for them to do? Especially the girls, said Oryx. They would only get married and make more children, who would then have to be sold in their turn. Sold, or thrown into the river, to float away to the sea; because there was only so much food to go around.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 135</div></div><p>Unbeknownst to Jimmy, Glenn also falls in love with Oryx. Glenn would become known as Crake, named after his avatar in a game called <cite>Exctinctathon</cite>, where everyone must assume the identity of an extinct species.</p>
<p>After high school, they part ways, but stay in touch. The brilliant Crake goes to the Watson-Crick academy and excels. Jimmy attends Martha-Graham Academy and skates through. Crake is recruited by one of the most powerful corporations in the world, RejoovenEsense, while Jimmy eventually ends up at ANooYoo Corporation, a cut-rate firm that markets quick-fix products to people of modest means.</p>
<p>Jimmy writes ad copy and excels at that, while Crake designs two things: (1) The Crakers, genetically designed to be docile and hardy enough to survive the (2) deadly virus that will wipe out most of humanity.</p>
<p>Crake is good enough at building stuff his company wants that he&rsquo;s also able to produce his Crakers as well as a product called BlyssPluss, which is touted as a sexual super-pill but additionally sterilizes its users (to control the population of the most dangerous species).</p>
<p>Crake hires Jimmy to market it, but the pill is basically so awesome that is markets itself. He calls Jimmy to visit him at his compound and shows him around.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;“What pays for all this?” he asked Crake, as they passed the state-of-the-art Luxuries Mall – marble everywhere, colonnades, cafés, ferns, takeout booths, roller-skating path, juice bars, a self-energizing gym where running on the treadmill kept the light bulbs going, Roman-look fountains with nymphs and sea-gods.</p>
<p>&ldquo;“Grief in the face of inevitable death,” said Crake. “The wish to stop time. The human condition.”&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 344</div></div><p>Crake just wants Jimmy close by for the endgame of his master plan, which involves getting rid of humanity. He explains that there are definite evolutionary problems with humanity.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;You can’t couple a minimum access to food with an expanding population indefinitely. Homo sapiens doesn’t seem able to cut himself off at the supply end. He’s one of the few species that doesn’t limit reproduction in the face of dwindling resources. In other words – and up to a point, of course – the less we eat, the more we fuck.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 138</div></div><p>Along with Crake, Atwood envisions a world freed from sexual frustration and competition. This is the world of the Crakers, which have been designed to avoid all of the pitfalls of humanity.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;It no longer matters who the father of the inevitable child may be, since there’s no more property to inherit, no father-son loyalty required for war. Sex is no longer a mysterious rite, viewed with ambivalence or downright loathing, conducted in the dark and inspiring suicides and murders. Now it’s more like an athletic demonstration, a free-spirited romp.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 195</div></div><p>Furthermore, Crake posits that, if one could flatten civilization, it would no longer be possible for another to arise.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;“Once it’s flattened, it could never be rebuilt.”</p>
<p>&ldquo;“Because why? […]”</p>
<p>&ldquo;“Because all the available surface metals have already been mined,” said Crake. “Without which, no iron age, no bronze age, no age of steel, and all the rest of it. There’s metals farther down, but the advanced technology we need for extracting those would have been obliterated.”&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 261</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;“It’s not like the wheel, it’s too complex now. Suppose the instructions survived, suppose there were any people left with the knowledge to read them. Those people would be few and far between, and they wouldn’t have the tools. Remember, no electricity. Then once those people died, that would be it. They’d have no apprentices, they’d have no successors.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 261</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;“All it takes,” said Crake, “is the elimination of one generation. One generation of anything. Beetles, trees, microbes, scientists, speakers of French, whatever. Break the link in time between one generation and the next, and it’s game over forever.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 261</div></div><p>Jimmy moves into the Rejoov compound and discovers that Crake has Oryx working for him and with the Crakers. Both Crake and Jimmy take up with her, but Jimmy thinks Crake doesn&rsquo;t know.</p>
<p>Crake&rsquo;s BlyssPluss not only sterilizes people, but also kills them. The virus it unleashes is deadly within hours, with scary red blotches and bloody pores and then death. When Crake&rsquo;s virus finally arrives, it&rsquo;s much worse than what our little natural coronavirus managed.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;For the first two weeks he followed world events on the Net, or else on the television news: the riots in the cities as transportation broke down and supermarkets were raided; the explosions as electrical systems failed, the fires no one came to extinguish.</p>
<p>&ldquo;Crowds packed the churches, mosques, synagogues, and temples to pray and repent, then poured out of them as the worshippers woke up to their increased risk of exposure. There was an exodus to small towns and rural areas, whose inhabitants fought off the refugees as long as they could, with banned firearms or clubs and pitchforks.&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 396</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Conspiracy theories proliferated: it was a religious thing, it was God’s Gardeners, it was a plot to gain world control. Boil-water and don’t-travel advisories were issued in the first week, handshaking was discouraged.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 398</div></div><p>Crake and Oryx are outside the compound when the chaos gets closer. Jimmy lets them into the airlock, but Crake kills Oryx, provoking Jimmy into killing him. With that move, Crake guarantees that he himself will not try to flout his own plan to leave the planet to his &ldquo;Crakers&rdquo;, with Jimmy taking care of them.</p>
<p>Back in the present, Snowman has plundered the Rejoov compound, but barely gets away with his life from the highly intelligent pigoons that pursue him. He makes it back to the beach, but has a bad infection on his foot. The Crakers try to heal it for him, with limited success (because they&rsquo;ve been deliberately stunted in their medical and scientific abilities). He stumbles upon three other humans around a campfire (this will be important in the next book).</p>
<p>Atwood has a wonderful way with words. She&rsquo;s parsimonious and expressive in her descriptions. I&rsquo;ve included a few non-sequitur samples below.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The sea is hot metal, the sky a bleached blue, except for the hole burnt in it by the sun. Everything is so empty. Water, sand, sky, trees, fragments of past time. Nobody to hear him.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 16</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;No moon, tonight is the dark of the moon, although the moon is there nevertheless and must be rising now, a huge invisible ball of stone, a giant lump of gravity, dead but powerful, drawing the sea towards itself.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 127</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;A long scrawl of birds unwinds from the empty towers – gulls, egrets, herons, heading off to fish along the shore.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 174</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;“Honey, we’re so proud of you,” said Ramona, who’d come decked out like a whore’s lampshade in an outfit with a low neckline and pink frills.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 205</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Unguent, unctuous, sumptuous, voluptuous, salacious, lubricious, delicious, went the inside of Jimmy’s head. He sank down into the words, into the feelings.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 372</div></div><p><hr></p>
<div class="footnote-reference"><span id="footnote_DRAFTABLE_ENTRY_4338_1_body" class="footnote-number">[1]</span> Disclaimer: these are notes I took while reading this book. They include citations I found interesting or enlightening or particularly well-written. In some cases, I&rsquo;ve pointed out which of these applies to which citation; in others, I have not. Any benefit you gain from reading these notes is purely incidental to the purpose they serve of reminding me of what I once read. Please see Wikipedia for a summary if I&rsquo;ve failed to provide one sufficient for your purposes. If my notes serve to trigger an interest in this book, then I&rsquo;m happy for you.</div><h2>Citations</h2><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The sea is hot metal, the sky a bleached blue, except for the hole burnt in it by the sun. Everything is so empty. Water, sand, sky, trees, fragments of past time. Nobody to hear him.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 16</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Women, and what went on under their collars. Hotness and coldness, coming and going in the strange musky flowery variable-weather country inside their clothes – mysterious, important, uncontrollable. That was his father’s take on things.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 19</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Another baffling item on the cryptic report card his mother toted around in some mental pocket, the report card on which he was always just barely passing.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 80</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;No moon, tonight is the dark of the moon, although the moon is there nevertheless and must be rising now, a huge invisible ball of stone, a giant lump of gravity, dead but powerful, drawing the sea towards itself.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 127</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The children were being trained to earn their living in the wide world: this was the gloss put on it. Besides, if they stayed where they were, what was there for them to do? Especially the girls, said Oryx. They would only get married and make more children, who would then have to be sold in their turn. Sold, or thrown into the river, to float away to the sea; because there was only so much food to go around.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 135</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;You can’t couple a minimum access to food with an expanding population indefinitely. Homo sapiens doesn’t seem able to cut himself off at the supply end. He’s one of the few species that doesn’t limit reproduction in the face of dwindling resources. In other words – and up to a point, of course – the less we eat, the more we fuck.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 138</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;He’d wanted to track down and personally injure anyone who had ever done harm to her or made her unhappy. He’d tortured himself with painful knowledge: every white-hot factoid he could collect he’d shove up under his fingernails. The more it hurt, the more – he was convinced – he loved her.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 158</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;A long scrawl of birds unwinds from the empty towers – gulls, egrets, herons, heading off to fish along the shore.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 174</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;He wishes he had something to read. To read, to view, to hear, to study, to compile. Rag ends of language are floating in his head: mephitic, metronome, mastitis, metatarsal, maudlin. “I used to be erudite,” he says out loud. Erudite. A hopeless word. What are all those things he once thought he knew, and where have they gone?&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 175</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;For animals with a diet consisting largely of unrefined plant materials, he’d pointed out, such a mechanism was necessary to break down the cellulose, and without it the people would die. Also, as in the Leporidae, the caecotrophs were enriched with Vitamin B1, and with other vitamins and minerals as well, at four or five times the level of ordinary waste material. Caecotrophs were simply a part of alimentation and digestion, a way of making maximum use of the nutrients at hand.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 188</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;It no longer matters who the father of the inevitable child may be, since there’s no more property to inherit, no father-son loyalty required for war. Sex is no longer a mysterious rite, viewed with ambivalence or downright loathing, conducted in the dark and inspiring suicides and murders. Now it’s more like an athletic demonstration, a free-spirited romp.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 195</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;“Honey, we’re so proud of you,” said Ramona, who’d come decked out like a whore’s lampshade in an outfit with a low neckline and pink frills.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 205</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;How could I have been so stupid? No, not stupid. He can’t describe himself, the way he’d been. Not unmarked – events had marked him, he’d had his own scars, his dark emotions. Ignorant, perhaps. Unformed, inchoate. There had been something willed about it though, his ignorance. Or not willed, exactly: structured. He’d grown up in walled spaces, and then he had become one. He had shut things out.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 215</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;He compiled lists of old words too – words of a precision and suggestiveness that no longer had a meaningful application in today’s world, or toady’s world, as Jimmy sometimes deliberately misspelled it on his term papers. (Typo, the profs would note, which showed how alert they were.)</p>
<p>&ldquo;He memorized these hoary locutions, tossed them left-handed into conversation: wheelwright, lodestone, saturnine, adamant. He’d developed a strangely tender feeling towards such words, as if they were children abandoned in the woods and it was his duty to rescue them.&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 230</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;“The best diseases, from a business point of view,” said Crake, “would be those that cause lingering illnesses. Ideally – that is, for maximum profit – the patient should either get well or die just before all of his or her money runs out. It’s a fine calculation.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 248</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;“Once it’s flattened, it could never be rebuilt.”</p>
<p>&ldquo;“Because why? […]”</p>
<p>&ldquo;“Because all the available surface metals have already been mined,” said Crake. “Without which, no iron age, no bronze age, no age of steel, and all the rest of it. There’s metals farther down, but the advanced technology we need for extracting those would have been obliterated.”&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 261</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;“It’s not like the wheel, it’s too complex now. Suppose the instructions survived, suppose there were any people left with the knowledge to read them. Those people would be few and far between, and they wouldn’t have the tools. Remember, no electricity. Then once those people died, that would be it. They’d have no apprentices, they’d have no successors.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 261</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;“All it takes,” said Crake, “is the elimination of one generation. One generation of anything. Beetles, trees, microbes, scientists, speakers of French, whatever. Break the link in time between one generation and the next, and it’s game over forever.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 261</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The artists, who were not sensitized to irony, said that correct analysis was one thing but correct solutions were another, and the lack of the latter did not invalidate the former.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 285</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Human society, they claimed, was a sort of monster, its main by-products being corpses and rubble. It never learned, it made the same cretinous mistakes over and over, trading short-term gain for long-term pain. It was like a giant slug eating its way relentlessly through all the other bioforms on the planet, grinding up life on earth and shitting it out the backside in the form of pieces of manufactured and soon-to-be-obsolete plastic junk.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 285</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;He should have been pleased by his success with these verbal fabrications, but instead he was depressed by it. The memos that came from above telling him he’d done a good job meant nothing to him because they’d been dictated by semi-literates; all they proved was that no one at AnooYoo was capable of appreciating how clever he had been. He came to understand why serial killers sent helpful clues to the police.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 292</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;He knew he was faltering, trying to keep his footing. Everything in his life was temporary, ungrounded. Language itself had lost its solidity; it had become thin, contingent, slippery, a viscid film on which he was sliding around like an eyeball on a plate. An eyeball that could still see, however. That was the trouble.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 305</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;[…] the competition’s ferocious, especially what the Russians are doing, and the Japanese, and the Germans, of course. And the Swedes. We’re holding our own though, we have a reputation for dependable product. People come here from all over the world – they shop around. Gender, sexual orientation, height, colour of skin and eyes – it’s all on order, it can all be done or redone. You have no idea how much money changes hands on this one street alone.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 340</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;“What pays for all this?” he asked Crake, as they passed the state-of-the-art Luxuries Mall – marble everywhere, colonnades, cafés, ferns, takeout booths, roller-skating path, juice bars, a self-energizing gym where running on the treadmill kept the light bulbs going, Roman-look fountains with nymphs and sea-gods.</p>
<p>&ldquo;“Grief in the face of inevitable death,” said Crake. “The wish to stop time. The human condition.”&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 344</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;As a species, we’re in deep trouble, worse than anyone’s saying. They’re afraid to release the stats because people might just give up, but take it from me, we’re running out of space-time. Demand for resources has exceeded supply for decades in marginal geopolitical areas, hence the famines and droughts; but very soon, demand is going to exceed supply for everyone.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 347</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;“Immortality,” said Crake, “is a concept. If you take ‘mortality’ as being, not death, but the foreknowledge of it and the fear of it, then ‘immortality’ is the absence of such fear. Babies are immortal. […]&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 356</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;They were in Jimmy’s bedroom, lying on the bed together with the digital TV on, hooked into his computer, some copulation Web site with an animal component, a couple of well-trained German shepherds and a double-jointed ultra-shaved albino tattooed all over with lizards. The sound was off, it was just the pictures: erotic wallpaper.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 370</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Unguent, unctuous, sumptuous, voluptuous, salacious, lubricious, delicious, went the inside of Jimmy’s head. He sank down into the words, into the feelings.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 372</div></div><p>A poet she is. Master of the language.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;For the first two weeks he followed world events on the Net, or else on the television news: the riots in the cities as transportation broke down and supermarkets were raided; the explosions as electrical systems failed, the fires no one came to extinguish.</p>
<p>&ldquo;Crowds packed the churches, mosques, synagogues, and temples to pray and repent, then poured out of them as the worshippers woke up to their increased risk of exposure. There was an exodus to small towns and rural areas, whose inhabitants fought off the refugees as long as they could, with banned firearms or clubs and pitchforks.&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 396</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Conspiracy theories proliferated: it was a religious thing, it was God’s Gardeners, it was a plot to gain world control. Boil-water and don’t-travel advisories were issued in the first week, handshaking was discouraged.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 398</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;“Change can be accommodated by any system depending on its rate,” Crake used to say. “Touch your head to a wall, nothing happens, but if the same head hits the same wall at ninety miles an hour, it’s red paint. We’re in a speed tunnel, Jimmy. When the water’s moving faster than the boat, you can’t control a thing.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 398</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;“Why would they hurt us?” asked Sojourner Truth.</p>
<p>&ldquo;“They might hurt you by mistake,” said Snowman. “As the ground hurts you when you fall on it.”</p>
<p>&ldquo;“But it is not the ground’s wish to hurt us.”</p>
<p>&ldquo;“Oryx has told us that the ground is our friend.”</p>
<p>&ldquo;“It grows our food for us.”</p>
<p>&ldquo;“Yes,” said Snowman. “But Crake made the ground hard. Otherwise we would not be able to walk on it.”</p>
<p>&ldquo;It took them a minute to work this one through. Then there was much nodding of heads. Snowman’s brain was spinning; the illogic of what he’d just said dazzled him. But it seemed to have done the trick.&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 409</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;What if I die up here, in this tree? he thinks. Will it serve me right? Why? Who will ever find me? And so what if they do? Oh look, another dead man. Big fucking deal. Common as dirt. Yeah, but this one’s in a tree. So, who cares?</p>
<p>&ldquo;“I’m not just any dead man,” he says out loud. Of course not! Each one of us is unique! And every single dead person is dead in his or her very own special way!&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 417</div></div>      </div>
      </div>
        <div class="footer">
    <div class="footer-data"><div class="footer-links"><ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/contact.php" title="">Contact</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/support.php" title="">Support</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/privacy.php" title="">Privacy</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/rights.php" title="">Rights</a></li></ul></div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="copyright">Copyright (c) 1999-2026 earthli.com. All Rights Reserved.</div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="versions">Powered by <ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore/app_news.php">earthli News 3.7</a></li><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore" title="">earthli WebCore&trade; 3.7</a></li></ul></div></div>    </div>
      </div>
  </div>  </body>
</html>
]]>
  </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
      <title type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[Babylon's Ashes by James S.A. Corey (2016) (read in 2021)]]>
  </title>
    <id>https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=4325</id>
    <link href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=4325"/>
    <updated>2022-02-06T18:46:52+01:00</updated>
    <author>
        <name type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[Marco von Ballmoos]]>
  </name>
      <uri>https://earthli.com/users/marco</uri>
    </author>
      <summary type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<p><small class="notes">Standard disclaimer [1]</small></p>
<p>This is the sixth book of the <cite>The Expanse</cite> series. It starts with Marco Inaros and his Free Navy in charge of the Slow Zone and <cite>Medina Station</cite> in it. Michio Pa is at the heart of the small group of higher-ups in the Free Navy who are beginning to seriously doubt Marco&rsquo;s... [<a class="complete-text-link" href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=4325">More</a>]</p>
]]>
  </summary>
      <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<html lang="en">
  <head>
    <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/themes/ice.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/fonts/raleway.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/core/medium.css">
  </head>
  <body>
<div class="style-controls">  <div class="page">
    <div class="page-body">
<div class="info-box-top">
<p>
Published by <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_user.php?name=marco" title="Marco von Ballmoos" class="visible">marco</a> on <span class="date-time">6. Feb 2022 18:46:52 (GMT-5)</span>
</p>
</div>
      <div class="text-flow wide">
  <p><small class="notes">Standard disclaimer [1]</small></p>
<p>This is the sixth book of the <cite>The Expanse</cite> series. It starts with Marco Inaros and his Free Navy in charge of the Slow Zone and <cite>Medina Station</cite> in it. Michio Pa is at the heart of the small group of higher-ups in the Free Navy who are beginning to seriously doubt Marco&rsquo;s qualifications and goals. Those goals always seem to change whenever Marco would have had to admit that he&rsquo;d failed. He managed to destroy billions on Earth, but the blow strikes simultaneously at Belters because they still obtain most of their volatiles and food from Earth. All other operations have failed in one way or another.</p>
<p>Filip is also increasingly unhappy with Marco, the Free Navy, and his place in it. He&rsquo;s a spoiled, teenaged, child of divorce, but his instincts aren&rsquo;t wrong. He thinks his mother is dead and finds that he cares. As Fred Johnson says about Marco,</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;He’s slaughtered billions of people and remade the shape of human civilization. No one can do something on that scale and see themselves as fully human anymore. He may be a god or he may be a devil, but he can’t stomach the idea of being just an unreasonably pretty man who stumbled into the right combination of charisma and opportunity.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 84</div></div><p>Marco, meanwhile, is employing guerrilla tactics to leave as much territory and population to the &ldquo;inners&rdquo; as possible, to increase the burden of people under their care. It doesn&rsquo;t occur to him that them taking care of these people will make his enemies look like the &ldquo;good guys&rdquo; to those people—including a lot of Belters.</p>
<p>The crew of the Rocinante is helping Earth and Mars pick up the pieces and fight the Free Navy. One part of the effort is to work with Monica on mini-documentaries highlighting the humanity of all people—to show Earthers and Belters that they&rsquo;re all suffering. They hope to show them that they should band together against the guerrilla force that doesn&rsquo;t seem to care about them—and that seems to be more pirate than government.</p>
<p>As always, there is the constant reminder of the sheer enormity of space relative to the minor affairs of humans.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The endless abyss opened around them, a whisper that the universe was larger than his ship. Larger than all the ships put together. Humanity could put its flag on thirteen hundred of those dots and not be a percent of a percent of a percent. That was the empire the inners were fighting and dying to control. A hundred more planets a dozen times over, and less than a rounding error of what was out there staring back at them.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 295</div></div><p>The Ring is an artifact built by an automatic program created by a billions-year-dead civilization. It provides access to a handful of systems, presumably only a fraction of what was once available. All of this is so beyond humanity&rsquo;s own capabilities, it&rsquo;s like giving an iPhone to a <a href="https://www.amazon.com/Yanomamo-Yanomam&ouml;-Studies-Cultural-Anthropology/dp/0155053272">Yanomamö</a>. <a href="https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0080801/">The Gods must be crazy</a>.</p>
<p>Prax is back on Ganymede and his team has discovered a way of growing food more quickly for the billions on Earth who no longer have consistent sustenance. The improvements would also benefit the Belt. However, the Free Navy seems to have killed off one of his researchers who was trying to publish the results in public. Prax eventually gets his research out onto the &lsquo;net and avoids the reprisals of the Free Navy—because they are by that time too busy saving themselves.</p>
<p>Michio Pa&rsquo;s splinter group teams up with Fred Johnson and the inners, partially for protection and partially because of aligned causes. There are various skirmishes that finally end up with Inaros vs. <cite>Rocinante</cite>. The Roci gets the upper hand, but Holden disables missiles that were on target because he saw that Filip was on board. Maybe not his proudest moment.</p>
<p>Fred Johnson dies of a stroke because of the high-G maneuvers of the battle. Because of this, Avasarala nominates Holden to attend the &ldquo;peace&rdquo; conference with the high-level Free Navy defectors. She personally takes on the task of honing his negotiating and diplomacy skills.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Strength by itself is just bullying, capitulation by itself is an invitation to get fucked; only mixed strategies survive. Everything is personal, but they know that too. They can smell pandering like a fart. If you treat them like they’re a treasure box where if you just tweak them the right way, the policy you want falls out, you’re already fucked. They’ll misjudge you, so be ready to use that.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 321</div></div><p>Meanwhile ships are still disappearing during ring transit—seemingly randomly—but Duarte sends a bunch through to support the Free Navy and to attack <cite>Medina Station</cite>. The railguns mounted on the alien station take out all of the ships, validating the efficacy of the defenses. Also, a bunch of ships didn&rsquo;t make it through from Laconia—what is going on with the gates?</p>
<p>All of this effort and energy put into war is further weakening the Sol System&rsquo;s ability to feed itself—and its colonies that still depend on it for supplies. The other planets largely have completely different biologies and cannot sustain human crops—they are often based on completely different chemistries.</p>
<p>Marco&rsquo;s only remaining adviser tells him that their three-year window of sustainability is shrinking rapidly. Naomi comes to the same conclusion,</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The problem, she thought as she replaced the injection nozzle on the coffee machine, was capacity. They could make anything, but they couldn’t make it all at once. Humanity was going to get by on the minimum until there was a way to increase production, and a lot of people living on the margin wouldn’t make it. They’d die on Earth, yes, but keeping the Belt fed wasn’t going to be trivial either.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 201 by <cite>Naomi</cite></div></div><p>But Marco and his inner advisers don&rsquo;t feel the pinch—as his kind never has.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Probably it wouldn’t come clear until they’d used up everything. Kings were always the last to feel the famine. That wasn’t just the Belt. That was all of history. The people who’d just been going about their lives were the ones who could speak to the actual cost of war. They paid it first. Men like Marco could orchestrate vast battles, order the looting and destruction of worlds, and never run out of coffee.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 202</div></div><p>Sanjrani is the one of Marco&rsquo;s former advisers who&rsquo;s run the numbers the most. He discusses the problem with Michio Pa.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;“We’re fine now,” Sanjrani said. “We’ll be fine for three years. Maybe three and a half. Then the recycling systems stop being able to meet demand. We won’t have infrastructure in place to fill the gaps. And then we’ll starve. Not just Earth. Not just Mars. The Belt too. And once we start, we’ll have no way to stop.”</p>
<p>&ldquo;“All right,” Michio said. “How do we fix it?”</p>
<p>&ldquo;“I don’t know,” Sanjrani said.&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 308</div></div><p>With a tenuous truce between part of the Belt and the Inner planets, Avasarala presses her advantage. They come up with a plan to take back Medina Station by sending a giant ice hauler named <cite>Giambattista</cite> filled with 4000 &ldquo;ships&rdquo; (or things that look like ships) that can be deployed to distract the railgun until others can board the station and overwhelm the Free Navy. Simultaneously, they attack other Free Navy bases to keep Inaros busy.</p>
<p>Bobbie and Amos lead an attack on the alien station with the railguns and manage to disable them. Filip abandons his father as Marco launches a final 15-ship attack on the Ring to take back <cite>Medina Station</cite> from the <cite>Rocinante</cite>, which is the only ship currently guarding it.</p>
<p>Naomi finally notices the pattern that explains all of the ships that went missing in transit, realizing that it is related to and/or caused by the cumulative energy levels of all simultaneous transits. She designs an attack on Marco that sends the <cite>Giambattista</cite>—filled with junk to increase its mass—through a gate at the same time that Marco&rsquo;s 15 ships come through. Therewith they manage to force the energy level high enough to cause Marco&rsquo;s ships to be swallowed up like all of the others.</p>
<p>More than before, there is a peace of sorts: instead of Belters having to be worried that their society will die out because of the 1300 worlds, they will head up the Transport Union, an organization headquartered on <cite>Medina Station</cite> and responsible for managing traffic through the gates—to prevent any ships from disappearing. Michio Pa is its first president.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;But it was also a mistake to lose sight of all the individual lives and choices and flashes of pure dumb luck that brought humanity as far as they’d come. History, she thought, was perhaps better considered as a great improvisation. A thinking-through of some immense, generations-long thought. Or daydream.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 521</div></div><p><hr></p>
<div class="footnote-reference"><span id="footnote_DRAFTABLE_ENTRY_4325_1_body" class="footnote-number">[1]</span> Disclaimer: these are notes I took while reading this book. They include citations I found interesting or enlightening or particularly well-written. In some cases, I&rsquo;ve pointed out which of these applies to which citation; in others, I have not. Any benefit you gain from reading these notes is purely incidental to the purpose they serve of reminding me of what I once read. Please see Wikipedia for a summary if I&rsquo;ve failed to provide one sufficient for your purposes. If my notes serve to trigger an interest in this book, then I&rsquo;m happy for you.</div><h2>Citations</h2><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;“Belt don’t make good parts,” the harbormaster whined. “We make the best parts there are,” Marco said. “History’s moved on, my friend.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 29</div></div><p>He made that true when he bombarded Earth and destroyed its industrial and lift capacity. But he just moved the baseline down.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;“He’s slaughtered billions of people and remade the shape of human civilization. No one can do something on that scale and see themselves as fully human anymore. He may be a god or he may be a devil, but he can’t stomach the idea of being just an unreasonably pretty man who stumbled into the right combination of charisma and opportunity.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 84</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The torches flared and died and flared again. The Rocinante was remade a little, the same way it had been over and over through the years. Little changes adding up over time as the ship moved from what it had been to what it would be next. Just like all the people she carried.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 126</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;“We’re not people,” he said. “We’re the stories that people tell each other about us. Belters are crazy terrorists. Earthers are lazy gluttons. Martians are cogs in a great big machine.”</p>
<p>&ldquo;“Men are fighters,” Naomi said, and then, her voice growing bleak. “Women are nurturing and sweet and they stay home with the kids. It’s always been like that. We always react to the stories about people, not who they really are.”&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 131</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;And in the midst of it all, the great spinning plume of water and ice as the reservoirs vented. The water reserves spun out from the station, briefly echoing the arms of the galaxy and then stopped, thinned, and spread out into the vast darkness of the Belt. Ice lost among the steady brightness of stars.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 146</div></div><p>Since when do Belters waste supplies?</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Father Cesar’s a good man. He’s gentle and he’s kind and he’s funny, and to him Belters are all Free Navy and radical OPA. If someone killed Pallas, he’d be worried about what the drop in refining capacity would do before he thought about how many preschools there are on the station.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 168</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;Marco said. “Send me the tracking data for all of the ships still answering to Pa’s commands. You tell your guard ships at Pallas Witch of Endor’s gone rogue. Jam it, kill it, and send the battle data to us. No mercy for traitors.”</p>
<p>&ldquo;Rosenfeld nodded. “And Fred Johnson?”</p>
<p>&ldquo;“Butcher will bleed in his turn,” Marco said. “Never fear. This war’s just beginning.”&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 187</div></div><p>Whatever ends up happening is what he&rsquo;d intended.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The problem, she thought as she replaced the injection nozzle on the coffee machine, was capacity. They could make anything, but they couldn’t make it all at once. Humanity was going to get by on the minimum until there was a way to increase production, and a lot of people living on the margin wouldn’t make it. They’d die on Earth, yes, but keeping the Belt fed wasn’t going to be trivial either.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 201</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;[…] she wondered if Marco had thought about that or if his dreams of glory had swept away any realistic plan for taking care of all the lives he’d disrupted. She had a guess about that. Marco was a creature of the grand gesture. His stories were about the single critical moment that changed everything, not all the moments that came after.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 201</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Probably it wouldn’t come clear until they’d used up everything. Kings were always the last to feel the famine. That wasn’t just the Belt. That was all of history. The people who’d just been going about their lives were the ones who could speak to the actual cost of war. They paid it first. Men like Marco could orchestrate vast battles, order the looting and destruction of worlds, and never run out of coffee.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 202</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The universe has plans for you, Josep said in her imagination. You couldn’t have come this far through so many dangers if there weren’t a reason for you to be here. The same beautiful bullshit that everyone told themselves. That they were special. That they mattered. That some vast intelligence behind the curtains of reality cared what happened to them. And in all the history of the species, they’d all died anyway.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 228</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Fred was quiet for a long time, a sense of mourning blooming in his chest, thick and aching. “Honestly, then? I don’t know how it ends. I don’t even know if it ends. I dedicated my life to this fight. First one side, and then the other. But now, I look at it? What’s happened with the gates. What’s happened to Earth. I don’t recognize this anymore. I keep doing what I can because I don’t know what else to do.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 252</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;When she died, she wanted it to be like this. Not in a hospital bed like her grandmother. Not in a sad little hole on Mars with a gun in her mouth or a gut full of pills like the failures of veterans’ outreach. She wanted to win, to protect her tribe and wipe the enemy into a paste of blood and dismay. But failing that, she wanted to die trying. A snippet of something she’d once read popped in her head: Facing fearful odds protecting the bones of her fathers and the temples of her gods. Yeah. Like that.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 265</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;A high-speed three-sixty with a precision-timed rail gun shot halfway through the spin wasn’t exactly standard combat tactics for Martian frigates, but she thought her old combat-tactics instructors would have approved.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 268</div></div><p>Dm17</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The endless abyss opened around them, a whisper that the universe was larger than his ship. Larger than all the ships put together. Humanity could put its flag on thirteen hundred of those dots and not be a percent of a percent of a percent. That was the empire the inners were fighting and dying to control. A hundred more planets a dozen times over, and less than a rounding error of what was out there staring back at them.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 295</div></div><p>The ring is an artifact built by an automatic program created by a billions-year-dead civilization. It provides access to a handful of systems, presumably only a fraction of what was once available. All of this is so beyond humanity&rsquo;s own capabilities, it&rsquo;s like giving an iPhone to a Yanomamo. The Gods must be crazy.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;His father tilted his head to one side. “I just told you that you failed. Now you’re giving me reasons why it’s okay that you failed? Is that how it works?” Filip knew the kind of calm now.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 299</div></div><p>Well, yes. Examining a failure is how you avoid the next one.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;Sanjrani relaxed and pulled up a diagram from the desk’s display. A complex series of curves laid over × and y axes. “We made assumptions when we started this,” he said. “We made plans. Good ones, I think. But we didn’t follow them.”</p>
<p>&ldquo;“Dui,” Michio said.</p>
<p>&ldquo;“First thing we did,” he said, “was destroy the biggest source of wealth and complex organics in the system. The only supply of complex organics that work with our metabolisms. The worlds on the other side of the ring? Different genetic codes. Different chemistries. Not something we can import and eat. But that was okay. Projections were clear. We could build a new economy, put together infrastructure, make a sustainable network of microecologies in a cooperative-competitive matrix.&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 307</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;“We’re fine now,” Sanjrani said. “We’ll be fine for three years. Maybe three and a half. Then the recycling systems stop being able to meet demand. We won’t have infrastructure in place to fill the gaps. And then we’ll starve. Not just Earth. Not just Mars. The Belt too. And once we start, we’ll have no way to stop.”</p>
<p>&ldquo;“All right,” Michio said. “How do we fix it?”</p>
<p>&ldquo;“I don’t know,” Sanjrani said.&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 308</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;She was trying to help. Only when she closed her eyes, she saw the red line sloping down toward nothing, and no upward green swoop to answer it. Three years. Maybe three and a half. But to make it work, they had to start now. Had to have started already.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 309</div></div><p>Ooooh a climate-change analogy.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;He’d missed two full shifts and come in during the middle of the third. Three days, almost, lost in the darkness of the security cell. No lawyer, no union representative. He could have asked for one—should have, by the rules and customs—but the certainty was solid as steel that it would have only meant more bruises. Maybe a broken bone. Vandercaust knew enough of history and human nature to know when the rules weren’t the rules anymore.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 317</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Being picked up by security, locked away, beaten, interrogated. They didn’t scare him in themselves. They scared him for what they said about how it came next. They scared him because they meant that Medina Station wasn’t a new beginning in history. It was and would be as red in the gutter as everyplace else humanity had set its flags.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 318</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Strength by itself is just bullying, capitulation by itself is an invitation to get fucked; only mixed strategies survive. Everything is personal, but they know that too. They can smell pandering like a fart. If you treat them like they’re a treasure box where if you just tweak them the right way, the policy you want falls out, you’re already fucked. They’ll misjudge you, so be ready to use that.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 321</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The whole process had been everything he hated—niggling on details and nuances, fighting over turns of phrase and the order information was presented in, fashioning something that, even where it wasn’t outright false, was tailored to be misunderstood. Politics at its most political.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 325</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;They’ll try embarrassing you a little to see how you react. Don’t try to one-up them, or they’ll try to escalate out of conflicts later. Stay on point.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 326</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Something will go wrong. Something always does. They’ll see something you didn’t mean them to see; they’ll have a trap set you didn’t know to expect. These are intelligent people, and all of them have their own agendas. When it happens—not if, when—the worst thing you can do is panic. The second worst thing you can do is engage.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 327</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;How many millions of times had people had this exact conversation before? How many wars had put two people together for a moment and then washed them apart? There had to be a tradition of it. A secret history of vulnerability and want and all the things that sex promised and only occasionally delivered. They were just one more couple among all the countless others. It only hurt this time because it was them.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 363</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Avasarala put out her hands, palms facing each other about a meter apart. “I’ve got a report on you this thick. I know every pimple you’ve popped since your voice broke. Everything. Praiseworthy, shameful, indifferent. Everything. I have violated your privacy in ways you can’t imagine.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 374</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Avasarala waved him back, leaned in toward Chen, a smile on her lips. “Inaros isn’t going to chase after the Giambattista and Rocinante, because he’ll be distracted by the largest and most aggressive fleet action in history kicking his balls up into his throat. By the time he understands what we were really after, it’ll be too late for him to do anything but hold his dick and cry. But I need to know that you’re in.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 374</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Luring Naomi and her lover out to Medina to be killed was the plan now. But more than that, it had always been the plan. They’d killed Fred Johnson as part of it. They’d abandoned Ceres too. The consolidated fleet’s massive and coordinated attacks had been them falling for his father’s brilliant strategy to lure them out. And if it failed, if something went wrong, that would always have been the plan too. His father’s new generals would change, getting better with every purge. And when it got so foul there was no way to pretend it into victory, it would be someone else who had failed. Maybe Filip.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 457</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;“An unshakable faith in humanity.”</p>
<p>&ldquo;“It’s true,” he said, shaking his head. Or maybe nuzzling a little. “Against all evidence, I keep thinking the assholes are outliers.”&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 473</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;“You don’t get to know that,” Naomi said. “They did or they didn’t. You didn’t put them out so that someone would send you a message about how important and influential you are. You tried to change some minds. Inspire some actions. Even if it didn’t work, it was a good thing to try. And maybe it did. Maybe those saved someone, and if they did, that’s more important than making sure you get to know about&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 476</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;“Hey,” Holden said. “Do you know what Planck’s constant is?”</p>
<p>&ldquo;“Six point six two six plus change times ten to the negative thirty-fourth meters squared kilos per second?”</p>
<p>&ldquo;“Sure, why not,” Holden said, raising one finger. “But do you know why it’s that and not six point seven whatever the rest of it was?” </p>
<p>&ldquo;Naomi shook her head. “Neither does anyone else. They still call it science. Most of what we know isn’t why things are what they are. We just figure out enough about how they work that we can predict the next thing that’s going to happen. That’s what you’ve got. Enough to predict. And if you think you’re right, then I do too. So let’s do this.”</p>
<p>&ldquo;She shook her head, but not at him. “A massive n equals one study where our null hypothesis is that we all get killed.”</p>
<p>&ldquo;“Not necessarily,” Holden said. “They only have fifteen to our one. We might still take them. We have Bobbie and Amos.”&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 482</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Where the air began and the crash couch ended was lost. The boundary between his body and his environment blurred. He had known since he was too young to remember learning that atoms were made from more space than material, and that at the lowest levels, the things that made atoms could bounce in and out of being. He’d never seen it before. He’d never been so aware that he was a vapor of energy. A vibration in a guitar string that didn’t exist.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 495</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;She wondered how long it would take to actually do something that mattered. And what would happen when they all ran out of time. She felt like she had a tiny Nico Sanjrani in the back of her head counting down the hours until the Belt—no, until all humanity—needed the farms and medical centers and mines and processing facilities that they hadn’t built because they’d been too busy fighting.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 497</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;“I’m sorry.”</p>
<p>&ldquo;What she meant was I’m sorry I didn’t stop the attack that killed your husband and I’m sorry I didn’t see Inaros for what he was sooner and I would do it all differently if I could live my life backward and try again.</p>
<p>&ldquo;Avasarala paused, looked deeply into Michio’s eyes, and it was like seeing someone through a mask. The deepness there startled her. When she spoke, it was as if she’d heard every nuance.</p>
<p>&ldquo;“Politics is the art of the possible, Captain Pa. When you play at our level, grudges cost lives.”&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 500</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;But as in astronomy the new view said: “It is true that we do not feel the movement of the earth, but by admitting its immobility we arrive at absurdity, while by admitting its motion (which we do not feel) we arrive at laws,” so also in history the new view says: “It is true that we are not conscious of our dependence, but by admitting our free will we arrive at absurdity, while by admitting our dependence on the external world, on time, and on cause, we arrive at laws.”</p>
<p>&ldquo;In the first case it was necessary to renounce the consciousness of an unreal immobility in space and to recognize a motion we did not feel; in the present case it is similarly necessary to renounce a freedom that does not exist, and to recognize a dependence of which we are not conscious.&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 515</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;She’d learned more about how to be with traumatized people in the last year than she’d ever hoped to know, and much of what she came to understand was that humans were domestic animals like dogs and cats. They responded poorly to threats and well to a gentle building of trust. Not rocket science, but easy to forget.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 518</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;But it was also a mistake to lose sight of all the individual lives and choices and flashes of pure dumb luck that brought humanity as far as they’d come. History, she thought, was perhaps better considered as a great improvisation. A thinking-through of some immense, generations-long thought. Or daydream.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 521</div></div>      </div>
      </div>
        <div class="footer">
    <div class="footer-data"><div class="footer-links"><ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/contact.php" title="">Contact</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/support.php" title="">Support</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/privacy.php" title="">Privacy</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/rights.php" title="">Rights</a></li></ul></div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="copyright">Copyright (c) 1999-2026 earthli.com. All Rights Reserved.</div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="versions">Powered by <ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore/app_news.php">earthli News 3.7</a></li><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore" title="">earthli WebCore&trade; 3.7</a></li></ul></div></div>    </div>
      </div>
  </div>  </body>
</html>
]]>
  </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
      <title type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[Nemesis Games by James S.A, Corey (2015) (read in 2021)]]>
  </title>
    <id>https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=4320</id>
    <link href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=4320"/>
    <updated>2022-02-05T23:26:12+01:00</updated>
    <author>
        <name type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[Marco von Ballmoos]]>
  </name>
      <uri>https://earthli.com/users/marco</uri>
    </author>
      <summary type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<p><small class="notes">Standard disclaimer [1]</small></p>
<p>This is the fifth book of the <em>The Expanse</em> series. The book starts with a Belter raid on a Martian base on Callisto. A 15-year-old named Filip leads the raid. He is forced to leave a man behind, but the mission is otherwise a success. They&rsquo;d managed to capture the stealth... [<a class="complete-text-link" href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=4320">More</a>]</p>
]]>
  </summary>
      <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<html lang="en">
  <head>
    <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/themes/ice.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/fonts/raleway.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/core/medium.css">
  </head>
  <body>
<div class="style-controls">  <div class="page">
    <div class="page-body">
<div class="info-box-top">
<p>
Published by <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_user.php?name=marco" title="Marco von Ballmoos" class="visible">marco</a> on <span class="date-time">5. Feb 2022 23:26:12 (GMT-5)</span>
</p>
</div>
      <div class="text-flow wide">
  <p><small class="notes">Standard disclaimer [1]</small></p>
<p>This is the fifth book of the <em>The Expanse</em> series. The book starts with a Belter raid on a Martian base on Callisto. A 15-year-old named Filip leads the raid. He is forced to leave a man behind, but the mission is otherwise a success. They&rsquo;d managed to capture the stealth shielding from the Martians and made it look like a botched raid on a different warehouse.</p>
<p>The <cite>Rocinante</cite> is back at <cite>Tycho Station</cite>, this time for a half-year of repairs and upgrades. Amos heads to Earth to take care of an old friend&rsquo;s affairs (Lydia has died). Alex heads for Mars to try to patch things up with his ex-wife. Naomi gets a message from the OPA that her son Filip is in trouble. She takes off without telling even Holden where she&rsquo;s going. The crew is scattered to the winds. Holden remains behind, overseeing the repairs—and taking up tools himself to keep himself busy.</p>
<p>Amos takes care of business in Baltimore, eventually meeting with his old partner Erich, who helps him out, but doesn&rsquo;t want anything else to do with him. Amos is too dangerous to have around.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The pleasantries were just ritual, but ritual was important. In Amos’ experience the more dangerous any two people were, the more carefully polite their social interactions tended to be. The loud, blustering ones were trying to get the other guy to back down. They wanted to stay out of a fight. The quiet ones were figuring out how to win it.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 125</div></div><p>Amos heads to a U.N. prison where they&rsquo;re keeping Clarissa. With Avasarala&rsquo;s help, he gets in to see her and is visiting with &ldquo;Peaches&rdquo; when the first rock hits the Earth. But I&rsquo;m getting ahead of myself a bit.</p>
<p>On Mars, Alex is rejected pretty quickly. He looks up Bobbie, who&rsquo;s working for Avasarala on an investigation into what&rsquo;s rotten on Mars. She&rsquo;s on the trail of massive hardware disappearance in the Martian Navy. Alex helps her investigate, trying to use his connections in the Martian Navy, but not really getting anywhere. Bobbie and Alex barely survive an attack but now know that they&rsquo;re on to something.</p>
<p>Naomi meets up with old friends on Ceres and we learn a bit of her backstory. She was married to Marco Inaros, a ruthless Belter rebel who used her code to destroy a ship with 234 souls on board. Naomi eventually tried to kill herself by walking out an airlock, but ran away from Marco and Filip instead.</p>
<p>Naomi ends up buying her son a ship, which he promptly siezes and gives to his father. Naomi is taken captive and forced to watch as Marco executes his master plan: he has accelerated three asteroids onto a collision course with Earth, but also coated them with Martian cloaking plating to help them evade Earth&rsquo;s defenses. The three rocks slam into planet Earth, eventually killing billions.</p>
<p>Marco Inaros is supposedly fighting for the survival of Belters. Fred Johnson puts it bluntly,</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Fred took another pull of his drink before he answered. “Their position is that the Belter culture is one adapted to space. The prospect of new colonies with air and gravity reduces the economic base that Belters depend on. Forcing everyone to go down a gravity well is the moral equivalent of genocide.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 57</div></div><p>Much later, Marco Inaros puts it into his own words.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;“Once upon a time there were a people who lived on moons and asteroids and the planets where life didn’t evolve. But then we found the gates, and those people died out because we didn’t need them. It’s why I have to do this. You don’t like my methods. I understand that. But they’re mine, and the cause is righteous.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 362</div></div><p>This reminds me of the fight to preserve deafness. They work to overcome their lack of hearing and become better in other ways. But could we become better in those ways without becoming deaf? Can we have the side effect without the main one? Can we have discipline in youth without the military or corporal punishment? It&rsquo;s a legitimate question, even if the answer is no. Evolution is a blunt instrument. There are perhaps more efficient ways of getting to the advantages we desire.</p>
<p>Holden meanwhile is following a hunch about missing ships. These ships are the ones that the Martian splinter group headed by Duarte is collecting for its own purposes, but also to donate to their new allies in Marco Inaros&rsquo;s Free Navy. Holden loops in Alex, who eventually heads out on a lead with Bobbie in the <cite>Razorback</cite>.</p>
<p>Duarte and Inaros are convinced that they&rsquo;re going to win, that they&rsquo;ll get their way, but Fred Johnson isn&rsquo;t so sure.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Fred smiled. “I don’t know what to think yet. I won’t until I know more about the enemy. But looking back through history, there are a lot more men who thought they were Alexander the Great than men who actually were.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 379</div></div><p>Their overall plan is multi-pronged. Alex and Bobbie are detected and their ship disabled by the Free/Martian Navy. Holden and Fred are on the hunt for who&rsquo;s a traitor on Tycho, but they eventually lose the protomolecule sample to an attack. Earth has been grievously wounded, half of Mars&rsquo;s Navy is under Duarte&rsquo;s control. The Belters are loose and causing trouble, Tycho is disabled, and Duarte has the protomolecule.</p>
<p>With no small amount of trouble, Amos and Clarissa make their way out of the depths of the prison and up to the surface. They start walking to Baltimore to get help from Erich. Clarissa uses her implants to save Amos&rsquo;s life and to get them supplies and bicycles to speed up their trip. They get to Erich, but he&rsquo;s reluctant to see that his empire is doomed.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;“Shit, I grew up like this. All these folks are just playing catch-up. Thing is, we’re humans. We’re tribal. More settled things are, the bigger your tribe is. All the people in your gang, or all the people in your country. All the ones on your planet. Then the churn comes, and the tribe gets small again.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 315</div></div><p>Clarissa tells Erich to get them to a rich-person&rsquo;s compound/island-chain where she knows they can get a private rocket off-planet. They use helicopters to get there, Amos, Erich, and Clarissa finally manage to repair the one rocket that&rsquo;s still there, and they lift off with the house staff in a hail of gunfire, defending themselves from the local security forces. Erich and Amos part ways once again, with Clarissa headed to the <cite>Rocinante</cite>, where Amos will vouch for her, but it will be tough going (that comes a bit later).</p>
<p>Meanwhile, Naomi figures out that Marco and the Free Navy have planted a version of her old sabotage program on the <cite>Roci</cite> and she manages to figure out how to warn Holden about it. She is punished severely for this, but manages to escape in a suit-less spacewalk to the ship she&rsquo;d given Filip, the <cite>Chetzemoka</cite>. Filip and Marco thinks that she&rsquo;s committed suicide, but she&rsquo;s survived, only to discover that the ship had been converted to a bomb with all outgoing communication disabled except for a distress message from her asking for help.</p>
<p>The <cite>Rocinante</cite> and the <cite>Razorback</cite> both converge on the <cite>Chetzemoka</cite> to save Naomi.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;[…] you know what the rules are? That we stop and help. Even if she’s not someone we know. Even if it was someone else’s voice. That’s the rule, because out here, we help each other. And if we stopped doing that because we’re more important or because the rules don’t apply to us anymore, I can make a decent case that we’ve stopped being the good guys.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 442</div></div><p>Naomi manages to alter the signal enough that they are warned off, then escapes in a flimsy spacesuit with barely any air, but still manages to get picked up by Bobbie and Alex. Everyone is once again safe and sound and reunited. Naomi is exonerated, as is Clarissa. Amos is still the baddest of bad-asses with absolutely all of the best lines. See the citations below—especially the last several—for some good examples.</p>
<p>The crew of the <cite>Rocinante</cite> manages to save the day and get back together. Earth is picking up the pieces. The Free Navy takes over Medina Station, Duarte takes control of his ships and heads off for Laconia, but the Barkeith, the largest of the ships, disappears forever, going “Dutchman” in a mysterious event that seems to be swallowing some ships.</p>
<p><hr></p>
<div class="footnote-reference"><span id="footnote_DRAFTABLE_ENTRY_4320_1_body" class="footnote-number">[1]</span> Disclaimer: these are notes I took while reading this book. They include citations I found interesting or enlightening or particularly well-written. In some cases, I&rsquo;ve pointed out which of these applies to which citation; in others, I have not. Any benefit you gain from reading these notes is purely incidental to the purpose they serve of reminding me of what I once read. Please see Wikipedia for a summary if I&rsquo;ve failed to provide one sufficient for your purposes. If my notes serve to trigger an interest in this book, then I&rsquo;m happy for you.</div><h2>Citations</h2><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Holden ignored him. “The thing you should be remembering is the magic bullet that stopped it all.” “The artifact was a lucky find for you, given what was —” “No, it wasn’t. It was the scariest fucking answer to Fermi’s paradox I can think of. Do you know why there aren’t any Indians in your Old West analogy? Because they’re already dead. The whatever-they-were that built all that got a head start and used their protomolecule gate builder to kill all the rest. And that’s not even the scary part. <strong>The really frightening part is that something else came along, shot the first guys in the back of the head, and left their corpses scattered across the galaxy. The thing we should be asking is, who fired the magic bullet? And are they going to be okay with us taking all of the victims’ stuff?</strong>”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 21</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Fred took another pull of his drink before he answered. “Their position is that the Belter culture is one adapted to space. The prospect of new colonies with air and gravity reduces the economic base that Belters depend on. Forcing everyone to go down a gravity well is the moral equivalent of genocide.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 57</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The pleasantries were just ritual, but ritual was important. In Amos’ experience the more dangerous any two people were, the more carefully polite their social interactions tended to be. The loud, blustering ones were trying to get the other guy to back down. They wanted to stay out of a fight. The quiet ones were figuring out how to win it.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 125</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The systems that the gate network had opened up were scattered across what everyone was pretty sure was the Milky Way galaxy. Cartography was still working out their relative locations, but even the initial findings put some of the new systems tens of thousands of light-years from Earth and with some distinct weirdness about time and location. Confronted by such unimaginably vast distances, it was easy to forget how much space was in just one solar system. Until you tried to find something in it.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 136</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Once Fred explained the problem, it took three hours to set up a rig that would capture the glow coming from the scattered screen and an hour more to get the computer to understand its new task. The properties of light coming off extrasolar dust clouds were apparently very different from a busted terminal display. Once the expert systems were convinced that the problem fit inside their job description, the lab went to work matching polarizations and angles, mapping the fissures in the surface of the display, and building a computational lens that couldn’t exist in the physical world.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 177</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;“Sometimes you don’t get redeemed,” she said, and her voice made it clear she’d thought about the question. Tired and strong at the same time. “Not every stain comes out. Sometimes you do something bad enough that you carry the consequences for the rest of your life and take the regrets to the grave. That’s your happy ending.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 234</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;“A code and a cipher. Cipher, you encrypt text so that no one can tell what the words in the message are. A code, you say the words right out in the open, but you change what they mean. Anyone with a smart computer and a lot of time can break a cipher. No one can break a code.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 246</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Give him another twenty years, he could run the solar system. Maybe more.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 306</div></div><p>What a laughably nonsensical thing to say.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;“Bullshit. Closure? You lost. It’s closed. You only say it wasn’t finished because you hadn’t won yet. I left. I sacrificed everything because having nothing away from you was better than having it all and being your puppet.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 307</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;“Shit, I grew up like this. All these folks are just playing catch-up. Thing is, we’re humans. We’re tribal. More settled things are, the bigger your tribe is. All the people in your gang, or all the people in your country. All the ones on your planet. Then the churn comes, and the tribe gets small again.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 315</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The town had been a decent size last week. Cheap little houses on narrow streets, solar panels on all the roofs sucking in the sunlight, back when there had been some. There were still people here and there. Maybe one house in five or six where the tenants were waiting for help to come to them or so deep in denial that they thought staying put was an option. Or they’d just decided they’d rather die at home. As rational a decision as any other, things being what they were.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 315</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;He understood the flaw in that logic: if comforting them comforted him, maybe comforting him comforted them, and they could all drive the ship into a rock while they smiled at each other.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 323</div></div><p>Still, everyone&rsquo;s happy. Sometimes that&rsquo;s the best you can hope for.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;“Belters. All Belters. It’s for Filip. So when his turn comes, there’s still a place for him. Not just a footnote. Once upon a time there were a people who lived on moons and asteroids and the planets where life didn’t evolve. But then we found the gates, and those people died out because we didn’t need them. It’s why I have to do this. You don’t like my methods. I understand that. But they’re mine, and the cause is righteous.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 362</div></div><p>This reminds me of the fight to preserve deafness. They work to overcome their lack of hearing and become better in other ways. But could we become better in those ways without becoming deaf? Can we have the side effect without the main one? Can we have discipline in youth without the military or corporal punishment? It&rsquo;s A legitimate question, even if the answer is no. Evolution is a blunt instrument. There are perhaps more efficient ways of getting to the advantages we desire.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Fred smiled. “I don’t know what to think yet. I won’t until I know more about the enemy. But looking back through history, there are a lot more men who thought they were Alexander the Great than men who actually were.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 379</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;“All right. How are you still alive?”</p>
<p>&ldquo;“Practice,” Amos said cheerfully.&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 395</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;“Then what do I get out of it?”</p>
<p>&ldquo;“You get out of here,” Amos said. “Place was kind of a shithole before someone dropped the Atlantic on it. It’s not getting better.”&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 396</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;“This attack is the greatest tragedy in human history,” Avasarala said, her voice deep and throbbing. She dominated the screen.</p>
<p>&ldquo;“But it was carried out by shortsighted, narcissistic criminals. They want a war? Too bad. They get an arrest, processing, and a fair trial with whatever lawyer they can afford. They want the Belt to rise up so they can hide behind the good, decent people who live there? Belters aren’t thugs, and they aren’t murderers. They are men and women who love their children the same as any of us. They are good and evil and wise and foolish and human. And this ‘Free Navy’ will never be able to kill enough people to make Earth forget that shared humanity. Let the Belt consult its own conscience, and you’ll see compassion and decency and kindness flourish in any gravity or none. Earth has been bloodied, but we will not be debased. Not on my fucking watch.”&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 401</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;“It doesn’t feel right. He’s the kind of man who carries a lot of weight in a small circle. Playing at this scale isn’t what he does best. He isn’t a bad tactician, and the timing of the attacks was showy in a way that seems like he was likely behind them. And he’s charming at the negotiating table. But…”</p>
<p>&ldquo;“But?”</p>
<p>&ldquo;“But he’s not a first-class mind, and this is a first-class operation. I don’t know how to put it better than that. My gut says that even if he’s taking credit for it, he has a handler.”</p>
<p>&ldquo;“What would your gut have said before the rocks dropped?”</p>
<p>&ldquo;Fred coughed out a laugh. “That he was an annoyance and a small-time player. So yes, it may just be sour grapes on my part. I’d rather think I was outplayed by someone who’s a genius at something grander than self-mythologizing.”&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 430</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;“He’s playing a short-run game. Yes, his stock’s high right now, and probably will be for a little while. But he’s standing in the way of the gates. All of this is to stop people from going out and setting up colonies. But the hunger is already out there. Smith couldn’t stop Mars from depopulating itself. Avasarala couldn’t put the brakes on the process, and God knows she tried. Marco Inaros thinks he can do it at the end of a gun, but I don’t see it working. Not for long. And he doesn’t understand fragility.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 432</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;There’s a faith in the technology. In the idea of maintaining an artificial ecosystem. We’re able to grow food on Ganymede, so they think humanity’s freed from the bonds of Earth. They don’t think about how much work we had to do for those crops to grow. The mirrors to concentrate the sun, the genetic modifications to the plants. The process of learning to build rich soil out of substrate and fungus and full-spectrum lights. And backstopping all of that, the complexity of life on Earth.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 432</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;[…] you know what the rules are? That we stop and help. Even if she’s not someone we know. Even if it was someone else’s voice. That’s the rule, because out here, we help each other. And if we stopped doing that because we’re more important or because the rules don’t apply to us anymore, I can make a decent case that we’ve stopped being the good guys.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 442</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;“Did he think I was joking about something? ’Cause I was just telling him how the sun comes up in the east.”</p>
<p>&ldquo;Peaches lifted a shoulder. “In his mind, we’re the good guys. Everything we say, he interprets that way. If you say you don’t care if he lives or dies, it must be your dry gallows humor.”</p>
<p>&ldquo;“Seriously?”</p>
<p>&ldquo;“Yep.”</p>
<p>&ldquo;“That’s a really stupid way to go through life.”</p>
<p>&ldquo;“It’s how most people do.”</p>
<p>&ldquo;“Then most people are really stupid.”</p>
<p>&ldquo;“And yet we made it to the stars,” Peaches said.&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 454</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;“Here’s the thing,” Amos said. “If you did go in there, you might feel like you had to do something. And then I might feel like I had to do something. And then we’d all be doing things, and we’d all wind up having a worse day, just in general.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 485</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;“If the Belters fall in line with this Free Navy thing, it’s going to be because they’re all out of any other kind of hope. The new systems and colonies —”</p>
<p>&ldquo;“Have erased their niche,” Avasarala said. “And that’s shitty, and maybe we could have found a way to support them. Put them on some kind of cooperative basic, but they put a cherry bomb up the ass of the largest functioning ecosphere in the system, and it’s going to be a while before handing them free food’s going to be an option for me, practically or politically.”&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 499</div></div>      </div>
      </div>
        <div class="footer">
    <div class="footer-data"><div class="footer-links"><ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/contact.php" title="">Contact</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/support.php" title="">Support</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/privacy.php" title="">Privacy</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/rights.php" title="">Rights</a></li></ul></div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="copyright">Copyright (c) 1999-2026 earthli.com. All Rights Reserved.</div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="versions">Powered by <ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore/app_news.php">earthli News 3.7</a></li><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore" title="">earthli WebCore&trade; 3.7</a></li></ul></div></div>    </div>
      </div>
  </div>  </body>
</html>
]]>
  </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
      <title type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[The Vital Abyss by James S. A. Corey (2015) (read in 2021)]]>
  </title>
    <id>https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=4328</id>
    <link href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=4328"/>
    <updated>2022-02-05T22:14:53+01:00</updated>
    <author>
        <name type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[Marco von Ballmoos]]>
  </name>
      <uri>https://earthli.com/users/marco</uri>
    </author>
      <summary type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<p><small class="notes">Standard disclaimer [1]</small></p>
<p>This story takes place after <cite>Abaddon&rsquo;s Gate</cite>. It tells the story of Paulo Cortázar, who started life as a somewhat gifted, but lazy student. He gets hooked on amphetamines during his latter years at university and manages to get his degree. He has some money set aside, but he... [<a class="complete-text-link" href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=4328">More</a>]</p>
]]>
  </summary>
      <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<html lang="en">
  <head>
    <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/themes/ice.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/fonts/raleway.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/core/medium.css">
  </head>
  <body>
<div class="style-controls">  <div class="page">
    <div class="page-body">
<div class="info-box-top">
<p>
Published by <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_user.php?name=marco" title="Marco von Ballmoos" class="visible">marco</a> on <span class="date-time">5. Feb 2022 22:14:53 (GMT-5)</span>
</p>
</div>
      <div class="text-flow wide">
  <p><small class="notes">Standard disclaimer [1]</small></p>
<p>This story takes place after <cite>Abaddon&rsquo;s Gate</cite>. It tells the story of Paulo Cortázar, who started life as a somewhat gifted, but lazy student. He gets hooked on amphetamines during his latter years at university and manages to get his degree. He has some money set aside, but he also now has a pretty big monkey on his back. He seems to be chronically incapable of landing a job, so he sets up his apartment for a <em>cleansing</em>—he&rsquo;s going to kick the drug habit that he, in a clearer moment, finally realizes has spiraled completely out of control. It takes over a week of suffering alone in his apartment, but he comes out clean. He has even less money now and still doesn&rsquo;t have a job. He has a fraught relationship with his mother that he abuses and uses for his own benefit. He is at least there when she dies.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;In the end, she was on little more than sedatives and antivirulence drugs. I gave them to her because it was what I had to give her. The night she died, I sat at her feet, my head resting on the red wool blanket that covered her wasted lap. Heartbreak and relief were my soul’s twin bodyguards. She moved beyond pain or distress, and I told myself the worst was over.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 14</div></div><p>A mysterious corporation takes an interest in him, liking his seeming lack of scruples. This doesn&rsquo;t bother him at all. He takes the job and begins work at Thoth Station, working for ProtoGen, the Jules-Pierre Mao corporation that unleashed the protomolecule on Eros. That experiment was organized by Cortázar and his team of scientists. The scientists there have had all human empathy worn out of them; they are monsters, seeing only experimental opportunity where most people see fellow human beings. </p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The changes that we went through to become what we became didn’t blind us to humanity. Our emotional lives didn’t stop. All of us in research suffered the same loves and hopes and jealousies that administration and maintenance and security did. If someone felt flattered or excluded or tired, we saw it just as anyone else might. The difference, and I think it was the only difference, came from not caring anymore.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 29</div></div><p>They are in love with the potential of the protomolecule and are more than arrogant enough to believe that they will be able to learn how it works and to control it.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Human studies required human subjects, and ethical guidelines made rigorous studies next to impossible. One didn’t give healthy babies a series of monthly spinal taps just because it would have been a good experimental design. I understood that, but to come to science expecting the great source of intellectual light and step so quickly into darkness was sobering.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 14</div></div><p>We know what happens to Eros—it crashes into Venus and builds the Gate—and we know what happens to Thoth Station—Fred Johnson, James Holden, and Miller breach it, executing their head of operations and arresting the rest of the staff.</p>
<p>This is the story of what happens to the staff. They are confined to a space station by the precursor to the Free Navy. They are all kept in a single, large, open room with little cover and little furniture, looked down upon by Belter guards. The do everything in the open and in public. The scientists without empathy—the most intelligent and ruthless ones—thrive the best. They openly scheme and openly copulate. Cortázar has a boyfriend whom he ends up betraying.</p>
<p>The renegade Martian contingent headed up by Duarte coerces the Belters into helping them find the most useful prisoner. They play mind games to get them to divulge information about the protomolecule. They slowly feed them information about what&rsquo;s happened with the Ring.</p>
<p>One of the prisoners gets a hand terminal with the information, but he doesn&rsquo;t have what it takes to make anything of it. Cortázar steals the terminal from him and makes a discovery. Instead of reporting it directly, he convinces the man from whom he stole the handheld of a completely fantastical and deeply wrong interpretation of the data. When the man reports the &ldquo;answer&rdquo; in an attempt to free himself, the Martians see through the vapidity of the solution and execute him.</p>
<p>Cortázar springs his trap to prove his worthiness and it works. He has properly divined the purpose of the Ring and the meaning of the data. The Martians take him away to eventually take him to the planet that would become Laconia, where Cortázar would develop protomolecule technologies, breeding &ldquo;catalysts&rdquo; and working to grant Duarte immortality.</p>
<p><hr></p>
<div class="footnote-reference"><span id="footnote_DRAFTABLE_ENTRY_4328_1_body" class="footnote-number">[1]</span> Disclaimer: these are notes I took while reading this book. They include citations I found interesting or enlightening or particularly well-written. In some cases, I&rsquo;ve pointed out which of these applies to which citation; in others, I have not. Any benefit you gain from reading these notes is purely incidental to the purpose they serve of reminding me of what I once read. Please see Wikipedia for a summary if I&rsquo;ve failed to provide one sufficient for your purposes. If my notes serve to trigger an interest in this book, then I&rsquo;m happy for you.</div><h2>Citations</h2><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;I believe now she used to denigrate herself in front of me in order to hear praise from someone, even if it was only a beloved child. I don’t resent the manipulation. If intellect and focus were indeed the legacies of my invisible father, emotional manipulation was my mother’s true gift, and it was as valuable. As important.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 10</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;I was a street rat living on basic, but the discovery of life was so rich and dramatic and profound that I wasn’t concerned with my status in the larger culture. My social microenvironment seemed to stretch to the horizon, and the conflicts within it—whether Tomás or Carla would be goalie, whether Sabina could tweak off-the-shelf bacterial cultures to produce her own party drugs, whether Didi was homosexual and how to find out without courting humiliation and rejection—were profound dramas that would resonate through the ages.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 10</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;There were explanations, of course, for this dearth of information: Human studies required human subjects, and ethical guidelines made rigorous studies next to impossible. One didn’t give healthy babies a series of monthly spinal taps just because it would have been a good experimental design. I understood that, but to come to science expecting the great source of intellectual light and step so quickly into darkness was sobering. I began to keep a book of ignorance: questions that existing information could not answer and my amateurish, half-educated thoughts about how answers might be found.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 14</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;In the end, she was on little more than sedatives and antivirulence drugs. I gave them to her because it was what I had to give her. The night she died, I sat at her feet, my head resting on the red wool blanket that covered her wasted lap. Heartbreak and relief were my soul’s twin bodyguards. She moved beyond pain or distress, and I told myself the worst was over.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 14</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Humanity is social, and the self-image of humans is built from the versions of ourselves we see and hear reflected in others; that this is not true of the research group—of Coombs or Brown or Quintana or me—was, after all, precisely the point.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 16</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;A thought experiment from my first course in the program: Take a bar of metal and put a single notch in it. The two lengths thus defined have a relationship that can be expressed as the ratio between them. In theory, therefore, any rational number can be expressed with a single mark on a bar of metal. Using a simple alphabetic code, a mark that calculated to a ratio of .1215225 could be read as 12-15-22-5, or “l-o-v-e.” The complete plays of Shakespeare could be written in a single mark, if it were possible to measure accurately enough.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 23</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The changes that we went through to become what we became didn’t blind us to humanity. Our emotional lives didn’t stop. All of us in research suffered the same loves and hopes and jealousies that administration and maintenance and security did. If someone felt flattered or excluded or tired, we saw it just as anyone else might. The difference, and I think it was the only difference, came from not caring anymore.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 29</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;“The idea that animal suffering is less important that human suffering is a religious one. It assumes a special creation, and that we—you and I—are different in kind than other animals. We are morally separate from rats or horses or chimps, not based on any particular physical difference between us, but just because we claim that we’re sacred by our nature and have dominion over them. It’s a story we tell that lets us do what we do. Consider the question without that filter, and it looks very different.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 38</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;“We are the animal we’re trying to build a protocol for. It’s where we’d get the best data. And better data means less suffering in the long run. More human suffering, maybe, but less suffering overall. And we wouldn’t have to labor under the hypocrisy of understanding evolution and also pretending there’s some kind of firewall between us and other mammals. That sounds restful, don’t you think?”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 39</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;A burden I hadn’t known I was carrying vanished, and my mind became sharper, able to reach into places that shame or guilt or neurosis would have kept me from before. I didn’t want to be what I had previously been any more than a depressive would long for despair.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 41</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;“One of the features of the illness is that she wasn’t able to be aware of the deficits. It’s part of the diagnosis. Awareness is a function of the brain just like vision or motor control or language. It isn’t exempt from being broken.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 58</div></div>      </div>
      </div>
        <div class="footer">
    <div class="footer-data"><div class="footer-links"><ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/contact.php" title="">Contact</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/support.php" title="">Support</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/privacy.php" title="">Privacy</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/rights.php" title="">Rights</a></li></ul></div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="copyright">Copyright (c) 1999-2026 earthli.com. All Rights Reserved.</div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="versions">Powered by <ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore/app_news.php">earthli News 3.7</a></li><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore" title="">earthli WebCore&trade; 3.7</a></li></ul></div></div>    </div>
      </div>
  </div>  </body>
</html>
]]>
  </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
      <title type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[The Dying Animal by Philip Roth (2001) (read in 2021)]]>
  </title>
    <id>https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=4317</id>
    <link href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=4317"/>
    <updated>2022-02-03T23:28:45+01:00</updated>
    <author>
        <name type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[Marco von Ballmoos]]>
  </name>
      <uri>https://earthli.com/users/marco</uri>
    </author>
      <summary type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<p><small class="notes">Standard disclaimer [1]</small></p>
<p>To no-one&rsquo;s surprise at all, this novel by Roth tells the story of a senior literature professor. His name is David Kepesh, but that doesn&rsquo;t really matter. This is, apparently, the third in a series that started with <cite>The Breast</cite>. At least Roth is dead-honest about what he... [<a class="complete-text-link" href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=4317">More</a>]</p>
]]>
  </summary>
      <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<html lang="en">
  <head>
    <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/themes/ice.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/fonts/raleway.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/core/medium.css">
  </head>
  <body>
<div class="style-controls">  <div class="page">
    <div class="page-body">
<div class="info-box-top">
<p>
Published by <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_user.php?name=marco" title="Marco von Ballmoos" class="visible">marco</a> on <span class="date-time">3. Feb 2022 23:28:45 (GMT-5)</span>
</p>
</div>
      <div class="text-flow wide">
  <p><small class="notes">Standard disclaimer [1]</small></p>
<p>To no-one&rsquo;s surprise at all, this novel by Roth tells the story of a senior literature professor. His name is David Kepesh, but that doesn&rsquo;t really matter. This is, apparently, the third in a series that started with <cite>The Breast</cite>. At least Roth is dead-honest about what he considers to be the most worthy literary subject of all time. It&rsquo;s really hard not to feel that this is autobiographical to some degree.</p>
<p>A Cuban-American named Consuela Castillo is taken one of his courses and she catches Kepesh&rsquo;s roving eye. An equally apt title for this book could also have been <em>Consuela&rsquo;s Rack</em>. She&rsquo;s Cuban, but Roth seems to be confused about what she looks like, as he describes her below.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;[…] there was always the blouse, against her white-white skin the silk blouse of one creamy shade or another unbuttoned down to the third button.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 10</div></div><p>The description is lovely, but a Cuban with white-white skin? Kepesh draws most of his fame from a local radio show that he hosts. That, together with his teaching, draws Consuela into his orbit. They begin to sleep together and develop quite an involved relationship. Despite the girl&rsquo;s youth and, in Kepesh&rsquo;s eyes, magnificent proportions, this is still not enough for him.</p>
<p>He continues another purely sexual relationship with Carolyn that he&rsquo;s been carrying on for years. He is afraid of meeting Consuela&rsquo;s family because he fears/knows that he wouldn&rsquo;t measure up. He&rsquo;s also wildly jealous, spinning fantasies of her leaving him or being wooed away by someone younger (this, despite his carrying on behind <em>her</em> back).</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;[…] it’ll never be calm, it’ll never be peaceful. I was worried about her walking around in that blouse. Peel off her jacket, and there is the blouse. Peel off the blouse, and there is perfection. A young man will find her and take her away. And from me, who fired up her senses, who gave her her stature, who was the catalyst to her emancipation and prepared her for him.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 40</div></div><p>It&rsquo;s ugly, but honest. He does not want to possess, but sees no other way to suppress the fear of losing her. It is childish, though, assuming a lack of agency in his partner. It&rsquo;s difficult to know whether there&rsquo;s anything worth saving about Kepesh&rsquo;s musings on life and relationships. They seem so circumscribed by a nearly incomprehensible lust.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;I see him watch her crossing the broad plaza—striding the plaza—at Lincoln Center. He is out of sight, behind a pillar, eyeing her as I did on the evening I took her to her first Beethoven concert. She is in boots, high leather boots and a shapely short dress, a devastating young woman out in the open on a warm autumn night, unashamedly walking the streets of the world for all to covet and admire—and she’s smiling.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 42</div></div><p>He&rsquo;s deliberately infantilizing her, putting her in the role of prey. Note he&rsquo;s never once mentioned whether she was a good student. (In fairness, he doesn&rsquo;t discuss his own scholastics at all, either.) She&rsquo;s not a person. She&rsquo;s just a magnificent pair of tits.</p>
<p>But it&rsquo;s an honest look at thoughts provoked by biology and deeply ingrained social convention. It is the job of a civilized person to contravene these instincts, to temper them, to control them. There is a bandwidth from appreciation of beauty to wanting to fuck it. We tend to use the same language to describe both ends: &ldquo;She&rsquo;s hot.&rdquo;</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;I played Beethoven and I masturbated. I played Mozart and I masturbated. I played Haydn, Schumann, Schubert, and masturbated with her image in mind. Because I could not forget the breasts, the ripe breasts, the nipples, and the way she could drape her breasts over my cock and fondle me like that.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 102</div></div><p>This all sounds so adolescent, so…unbelievable for an older man, one who&rsquo;s perhaps shed at least <em>some</em> of the chemical capacity that drives younger men nearly insane. But urges are urges and you can&rsquo;t wish them away. You can master them, but you can&rsquo;t make them never have existed. And don&rsquo;t judge his urges as if you don&rsquo;t have any of your own. Perhaps your own are less prurient, but his are wholly human and seemingly shared by a large part of humanity.</p>
<p>It&rsquo;s good to have someone explain how he dealt with it, how selfish he at times was, all the while nearly helplessly trapped by his desire into being even more selfish (or so it seems have felt to him). If you only judge and condemn something that so much of humanity does, then you&rsquo;re simultaneously condemning yourself to the losing side.</p>
<p>Consuela leaves him because he won&rsquo;t commit. Years later, she returns to him to photograph her body as it was—before she must undergo a mastectomy. He is the only one she trusts to revere her body properly for such a task. She&rsquo;s probably right.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;[…] for all of the Castillos’ Cuba that Castro had ruined, for everything she feared she was about to leave—all of it was so great that in my arms, for a full five minutes, Consuela went out of her mind.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 153</div></div><p>The allusion to Castro and the revolution is interesting in that Consuela&rsquo;s family is fabulously well-off. They are incredibly resentful of having &ldquo;lost everything&rdquo;, though.</p>
<p>This is what the revolution wreaks, no? Those who benefit greatly from the prior system see themselves as basically good, hard-working, while everyone else is mysteriously poor or unworthy through their own doing. When the revolution hits, they feel they&rsquo;ve lost everything, rather than having been lucky enough to have enjoyed a good life that they&rsquo;d only had because so many others didn&rsquo;t.</p>
<p>They <em>lost</em> nothing; the library book that was their life was due back at the library. Instead of being happy that they were able to live so long on high, they lament that it&rsquo;s over and that now they&rsquo;re like everyone else. But even here, they ran away with their wealth and connections, keeping the book and whining that the library won&rsquo;t give them more.</p>
<p>That&rsquo;s pretty much the main story arc. There is a side story about Kepesh eventually reunites with his estranged son, who has, after years of struggle, become exactly like his father. The son&rsquo;s wife has caught him in an affair. Kepesh and son clash about it, with his son denying that he and his father are in any way the same.</p>
<p>Kepesh mocks the son, who thinks that the difference is in the <em>quality</em> of the adultery. That his father&rsquo;s dalliances were nearly purely prurient, lustful, and, therefore, unworthy.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;You should hear him about this girl. A chemist who also has a degree in art history. And plays the oboe. Wonderful, I tell him. Even in your adultery you are better than I am. He won’t even call it adultery. His adultery is different from everyone else’s. It’s too committed an arrangement to be called adultery. And commitment is what I lack. My adulteries weren’t serious enough to suit him.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 86</div></div><p>Kepesh goes on to mock his son&rsquo;s need to soothe his own conscience, as if to convince himself that he is so morally upstanding that he could only stray because his <em>mind</em> caused him to, rather than his <em>penis</em>. As if that makes it better for the partner whose trust he&rsquo;d betrayed.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;This one cannot fuck if he doesn’t have a dominatrix over him snapping a whip. This one cannot fuck if the girl is not dressed like a chambermaid. Some can fuck only midgets, some only criminals, some only chickens. My son can fuck only a girl with the right moral credentials. Please, I tell him, it’s a perversity, no better or worse than any other. Recognize it for what it is and don’t feel so special.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 88</div></div><p>Kepesh also tells of an incredible force-of-nature named Janie Wyatts, with whom he was friends when he was in college, in the sixties. She was a free spirit and took what she wanted from the world, but she also demanded change. She was fearless. He reveres her and her ilk as a missed opportunity for civilization, forging their path along a lost way that we can never find again.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;But she was neither stupid nor a slut. Janie was someone who knew what she was doing. She stood in front of you, small as she was, with her legs slightly apart, planted, lots of freckles, blond short hair, no makeup except bright red lipstick, and her big, open confessional grin: this is what I am, this is what I do, if you don’t like it, it’s too bad.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 49</div></div><p>This reminds me of the Swiss teenage attitude I&rsquo;ve recently heard of. They were described as being remarkably free of Puritan shackles and sexual baggage. Maybe that&rsquo;s the way forward. The overemphasis on sex, while understandable, must, at some point, take a back seat to more intellectual concerns, else we are doomed to a local maximum, where we&rsquo;ve overcome sexual hangups that, for years, dominated and polluted human affairs, but we will succumb to a climate catastrophe whose severity we are still not capable of wholly grasping, preferring instead, as always, to focus on our own immediate needs. It&rsquo;s the danger of a job well done (in this case, the job of overcoming silly societal constraints): one is reluctant to acknowledge further work to do, to say nothing of actually tackling it.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The Janie Wyatts of the American sixties knew how to operate around engorged men. They were themselves engorged, so they knew how to transact business with them. The venturous male drive, the male initiative, wasn’t a lawless action requiring denunciation and adjudication but a sexual sign that one responds to or not. To control the male impulse and report it? They were not educated in that ideological system. They were far too playful to be indoctrinated with animus and resentment and grievance from above. They were educated in the instinctual system. They weren’t interested in replacing the old inhibitions and prohibitions and moral instruction with new forms of surveillance and new systems of control and a new set of orthodox beliefs.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 57</div></div><p>He continues to lament the passing of a less-contentious world, one in which it was less a war between oppressed parties. But this world perhaps never existed. He makes a good argument that it did, for a while, but that it slipped away. True equality will have to wait, instead swaying to and fro between pendulum points, going to extremes on a spectrum, avoiding the plurality of territory between.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;[…] that someone would consent to anything without the ritual of psychological besiegement, of unremitting, monomaniacal tenacity and exhortation, well, that was unthinkable. There was no way to get a blow job, certainly, other than by dint of superhuman perseverance.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 66</div></div><p>The rest of the book is a more-or-less philosophical discourse on various topics, mostly lust and sex, but occasionally aging and death, marriage and children and the &ldquo;standard&rdquo; life strongly encouraged by society. A bit of a study of meaning and meaninglessness.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Coupled life and family life bring out everything that’s childish in everyone involved.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 110</div></div><p>His lacuna here is his own obsession with sex as a lens through which to view literally everything else, not noticing how immature and biological that is. It makes everything infinitely more complicated and messy than other interactions. He believes that there is literally no other reason for human interaction other than <span class="quote-inline">&ldquo;sexual business&rdquo;</span>.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Sex is all the enchantment required. Do men find women so enchanting once the sex is taken out? Does anyone find anyone of any sex that enchanting unless they have sexual business with them? Who else are you that enchanted by? Nobody.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 16</div></div><p>I don&rsquo;t know what compulsion drove him to write this book, but I&rsquo;m glad he did. I am not him, but there is enough of what he writes that rings a bit familiar, or is understandable (<em>nachvollziehbar</em> in German) that it&rsquo;s nice to see a writer of his capability give voice to that which most would be too ashamed to admit, even in part. The beast lurks within. Taming it is a series of conscious acts we spend a lifetime trying to transform into unconscious ones.</p>
<p><hr></p>
<div class="footnote-reference"><span id="footnote_DRAFTABLE_ENTRY_4317_1_body" class="footnote-number">[1]</span> Disclaimer: these are notes I took while reading this book. They include citations I found interesting or enlightening or particularly well-written. In some cases, I&rsquo;ve pointed out which of these applies to which citation; in others, I have not. Any benefit you gain from reading these notes is purely incidental to the purpose they serve of reminding me of what I once read. Please see Wikipedia for a summary if I&rsquo;ve failed to provide one sufficient for your purposes. If my notes serve to trigger an interest in this book, then I&rsquo;m happy for you.</div><h2>Citations</h2><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The first time she came to see me—and we sat side by side at my desk, as directed, with the door wide open to the public corridor, all eight of our limbs, our two contrasting torsos visible to every Big Brother of a passerby&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 9</div></div><p>He&rsquo;s a known predator.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;I haven’t broken this rule since, back in the mid-eighties, the phone number of the sexual harassment hotline was first posted outside my office door.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 5</div></div><p>He&rsquo;s a known predator.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;there was always the blouse, against her white-white skin the silk blouse of one creamy shade or another unbuttoned down to the third button.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 10</div></div><p>Isn&rsquo;t she Cuban, though?</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;And that’s what I’d seen right off: the decorous, loyal private secretary, the office treasure to a man of power, the head of the bank or the law firm. She truly was of a bygone era, a throwback to a more mannerly time, and I guessed that her way of thinking about herself, like her way of comporting herself, had a lot to do with her being the daughter of wealthy Cuban émigrés, rich people who’d fled the revolution.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 11</div></div><p>Good Lord, that&rsquo;s cynical and so baiting as to have been nearly deliberate.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;These are the veils of the dance. Don’t confuse it with seduction. This is not seduction. What you’re disguising is the thing that got you there, the pure lust. The veils veil the blind drive. Talking this talk, you have a misguided sense, as does she, that you know what you’re dealing with. But it’s not as though you’re interviewing a lawyer or hiring a doctor and that whatever’s said along the way is going to change your course of action. You know you want it and you know you’re going to do it and nothing is going to stop you. Nothing is going to be said here that’s going to change anything.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 15</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;[…] all this is merely a detour on the way to getting where we’re going. It’s part of the enchantment, I suppose, but it’s the part that if I could have none of, I’d feel much better. Sex is all the enchantment required. Do men find women so enchanting once the sex is taken out? Does anyone find anyone of any sex that enchanting unless they have sexual business with them? Who else are you that enchanted by? Nobody.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 16</div></div><p>No. Just no. That&rsquo;s just wildly misguided. It eloquently describes the single-mindedness of the character.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;This is comedy. It is the comedy of creating a connection that is not the connection—that cannot begin to compete with the connection—created unartificially by lust. This is the instant conventionalizing, the giving us something in common on the spot, the trying to transform lust into something socially appropriate. Yet it’s the radical inappropriateness that makes lust lust.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 16</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Because in sex there is no point of absolute stasis. There is no sexual equality and there can be no sexual equality, certainly not one where the allotments are equal, the male quotient and the female quotient in perfect balance. There’s no way to negotiate metrically this wild thing. It’s not fifty-fifty like a business transaction. It’s the chaos of eros we’re talking about, the radical destabilization that is its excitement. You’re back in the woods with sex. You’re back in the bog.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 20</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;In Consuela’s case, because the vast difference in age gives her permission to submit, I think. My age and my status give her, rationally, the license to surrender, and surrendering in bed is a not unpleasant sensation. But simultaneously, to give yourself over intimately to a much, much older man provides this sort of younger woman with authority of a kind she cannot get in a sexual arrangement with a younger man. She gets both the pleasures of submission and the pleasures of mastery.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 32</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;it’ll never be calm, it’ll never be peaceful. I was worried about her walking around in that blouse. Peel off her jacket, and there is the blouse. Peel off the blouse, and there is perfection. A young man will find her and take her away. And from me, who fired up her senses, who gave her her stature, who was the catalyst to her emancipation and prepared her for him.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 40</div></div><p>It&rsquo;s ugly, but honest. He does not want to possess, but sees no other way to suppressing the fear of losing. It is childish, though, assuming a lack of agency in the partner.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;It’s a representation, ordinary pornography. It’s a fallen art form. It’s not just make-believe, it’s patently insincere. You want the girl in the porno film, but you’re not jealous of whoever’s fucking her because he becomes your surrogate. Quite amazing, but that’s the power of even fallen art. He becomes a stand-in, there in your service; that removes the sting and turns it into something pleasant.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 41</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;I see him watch her crossing the broad plaza—striding the plaza—at Lincoln Center. He is out of sight, behind a pillar, eyeing her as I did on the evening I took her to her first Beethoven concert. She is in boots, high leather boots and a shapely short dress, a devastating young woman out in the open on a warm autumn night, unashamedly walking the streets of the world for all to covet and admire—and she’s smiling.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 42</div></div><p>Deliberately infantilizing, putting her in the role of prey. Note he&rsquo;s never once mentioned whether she was a good student. (In fairness, he doesn&rsquo;t discuss his own scholastics at all, either.) She&rsquo;s not a person. She&rsquo;s just a magnificent pair of tits. He might as well have titled this &ldquo;Consuela&rsquo;s Rack&rdquo;. But it&rsquo;s an honest look at thoughts provoked by biology and deeply ingrained social convention. It is the job of a civilized person to contravene these instincts, to temper them, to control them. There is a bandwidth from appreciation of beauty to wanting to fuck it. We tend to use the same language to describe both ends. &ldquo;she&rsquo;s hot.&rdquo;</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;It is impossible to think that not everybody is feeling this way about this girl because not everybody has an obsession about this girl. Instead, you can’t imagine her going anywhere. You can’t imagine her on the street, in a store, at a party, on the beach without that guy emerging from the shadows. The pornographic torment: watching somebody else do it who once was you.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 42</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;As in her own family there is lots of respect for the father, everyone is well educated, everyone is easily bilingual, the right schools, the right country club, they read El Diario and the Bergen Record, they love Reagan, love Bush, hate Kennedy, rich New Jersey Cubans to the right of Louis XIV,&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 45</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;But she was neither stupid nor a slut. Janie was someone who knew what she was doing. She stood in front of you, small as she was, with her legs slightly apart, planted, lots of freckles, blond short hair, no makeup except bright red lipstick, and her big, open confessional grin: this is what I am, this is what I do, if you don’t like it, it’s too bad.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 49</div></div><p>This reminds me of the Swiss teenage attitude we recently heard of. They were described as being remarkably free of Puritan shackles and sexual baggage. Maybe that&rsquo;s the way forward, though the overemphasis on sex, while understandable, must, at some point, take a back seat to more intellectual concerns, else we are doomed to a local maximum, where we&rsquo;ve overcome sexual hangups that, for years, dominated and polluted human affairs, but we will succumb to a climate catastrophe whose severity we are still not capable of wholly grasping, preferring instead, as always, to focus on our own immediate needs. It&rsquo;s the danger of a job well done (in this case, the job of overcoming silly societal constraints): one is reluctant of acknowledging further work to do, to say nothing of actually tackling it.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Twenty years earlier, in my college days, the campuses had been perfectly managed. Parietal regulations. Unquestioned supervision. The authority came from a distant Kafkaesque source—“the administration”—and the language of the administration could have come from Saint Augustine. You tried to find your wily way around all this control, but until about ’64, by and large everyone under surveillance was law-abiding, members in excellent standing of what Hawthorne called “the limit-loving class.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 51</div></div><p>Everything cycles. Now we have returned to those &ldquo;halcyon&rdquo; days.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;[…] the uninhibited everything that the Consuelas and the Mirandas nonchalantly take for granted derives from the audacity of the shameless, subversive Janie Wyatts and the amazing victory they achieved in the sixties through the force of atrocious behavior. The coarse dimension of American life previously captured in gangster films, that’s what Janie hauled on campus, because that’s the intensity it took to undo the upholders of the norms. That’s how you carried the quarrel to your keepers—in your ugly language rather than theirs.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 53</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The Janie Wyatts of the American sixties knew how to operate around engorged men. They were themselves engorged, so they knew how to transact business with them. The venturous male drive, the male initiative, wasn’t a lawless action requiring denunciation and adjudication but a sexual sign that one responds to or not. To control the male impulse and report it? They were not educated in that ideological system. They were far too playful to be indoctrinated with animus and resentment and grievance from above. They were educated in the instinctual system. They weren’t interested in replacing the old inhibitions and prohibitions and moral instruction with new forms of surveillance and new systems of control and a new set of orthodox beliefs.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 57</div></div><p>Not anymore.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Age-old American story: save the young from sex. Yet it’s always too late. Too late because they’ve already been born.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 60</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;[…] the fact that I was born in this year and not in that year? People fifteen, twenty years younger than I, the privileged beneficiaries of the revolution, could afford to go through it unconsciously. There was this exuberant party, this squalid paradise of disarray, and, without thinking or having to think, they claimed it, and usually with all its trivia and trash. But I had to think. There I was, still in the prime of life and the country entering into this extraordinary time.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 64</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;[…] that someone would consent to anything without the ritual of psychological besiegement, of unremitting, monomaniacal tenacity and exhortation, well, that was unthinkable. There was no way to get a blow job, certainly, other than by dint of superhuman perseverance.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 66</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Carolyn’s realism—the sense of proportion adult indignities had predictably imposed on the romantic expectations of a highly credentialed upper-middle-class girl […]&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 71</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;One’s impossible character. The stupidity of being oneself. The unavoidable comedy of being anyone at all. Each new excess weakening me further—yet what is an insatiable man to do?&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 72</div></div><p>I don&rsquo;t know what compulsion drove him to write this book, but I&rsquo;m glad he did. I am not him, but there is enough of what he writes that rings a bit familiar, or is understandable (<em>nachvollziehbar</em> in German) that it&rsquo;s nice to see a writer of his capability give voice to that which most would be too ashamed to admit, even in part. The beast lurks within. Taming it is a series of conscious acts we spend a lifetime trying to transform into unconscious ones.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Pro-choice I was, but that didn’t mean pro her choice for him. I urged him to remind her as often as he could that, at the age of twenty-one and just graduating from college, he didn’t want a child, couldn’t support a child, didn’t intend in any way to be responsible for a child. If, at twenty-one, she wanted the responsibility all on her own, that was a decision made by her for herself alone. I offered him money to pay for an abortion. I told him I was behind him and not to cave in. “But what if she won’t change her mind? What,” he asked me, “if she flatly refuses?” I said that if she didn’t come to her senses, she would have to live with the consequences. I reminded him that nobody could make him do what he didn’t want to do.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 80</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;But here, free of totalitarianism, a man like you has to provide himself his own misery. You, moreover, are intelligent, articulate, good-looking, well educated—you are made to thrive in a country like this one. Here the only tyrant lying in wait will be convention, which is not to be taken lightly either.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 81</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;You should hear him about this girl. A chemist who also has a degree in art history. And plays the oboe. Wonderful, I tell him. Even in your adultery you are better than I am. He won’t even call it adultery. His adultery is different from everyone else’s. It’s too committed an arrangement to be called adultery. And commitment is what I lack. My adulteries weren’t serious enough to suit him.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 86</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;This one cannot fuck if he doesn’t have a dominatrix over him snapping a whip. This one cannot fuck if the girl is not dressed like a chambermaid. Some can fuck only midgets, some only criminals, some only chickens. My son can fuck only a girl with the right moral credentials. Please, I tell him, it’s a perversity, no better or worse than any other. Recognize it for what it is and don’t feel so special.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 88</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;In my mind, I tried to excuse you, I tried to understand you. But the sixties? That explosion of childishness, that vulgar, mindless, collective regression, and that explains everything and excuses it all? Can’t you come up with any better alibi? Seducing defenseless students, pursuing one’s sexual interests at the expense of everyone else—that’s so very necessary, is it?&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 90</div></div><p>Here he uses the son to provide the counterargument.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;I played Beethoven and I masturbated. I played Mozart and I masturbated. I played Haydn, Schumann, Schubert, and masturbated with her image in mind. Because I could not forget the breasts, the ripe breasts, the nipples, and the way she could drape her breasts over my cock and fondle me like that.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 102</div></div><p>This all sounds so adolescent, so…unbecoming of an older man. But urges are urges and you can&rsquo;t wish them away. You can master them, but you can&rsquo;t make them never have existed. And don&rsquo;t judge his urges as if you don&rsquo;t have any of your own. Perhaps your own are less prurient, but his are wholly human and seemingly shared by a large part of humanity. It&rsquo;s good to have someone explain how he dealt with it, how selfish he at times was, all the while nearly helplessly trapped by his desire into being even more selfish (or so it seems have felt to him). If you only judge and condemn something that so much of humanity does, then you&rsquo;re simultaneously condemning yourself to the losing side.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;What do I mean by ridiculous? What is ridiculousness? Relinquishing one’s freedom voluntarily—that is the definition of ridiculousness. If your freedom is taken from you by force, needless to say you’re not ridiculous, except to the one who has forcibly taken it. But whoever gives his freedom away, whoever is dying to give it away, enters the realm of the ridiculous&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 104</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;This need. This derangement. Will it never stop? I don’t even know after a while what I’m desperate for. Her tits? Her soul? Her youth? Her simple mind? Maybe it’s worse than that—maybe now that I’m nearing death, I also long secretly not to be free.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 106</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Elena’s intelligent, tremendously capable, yet for her the desire for a child is the standard unthinking. Yes, the idea activates the propagative instinct, and that’s the pathos of it, all right. But it’s still part of the standard unthinking: you go on to the next step. It’s so primitive for someone so accomplished. But this is the way she imagined adulthood long, long ago, before adulthood, before diseases of the retina became her life’s passion.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 109</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Coupled life and family life bring out everything that’s childish in everyone involved.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 110</div></div><p>His lacuna here is his obsession with sex, not noticing how immature and biological that is, well. And infinitely more complicated and messy than other interactions.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;But what can be done about it? I’m a critic, I’m a teacher—didacticism is my destiny. Argument and counterargument is what history’s made of. One either imposes one’s ideas or one is imposed on. Like it or not, that’s the predicament. There are always opposing forces, and so, unless one is inordinately fond of subordination, one is always at war.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 112</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;I have colleagues, sure, people I see at work and talk to in passing, but the assumptions underlying the way they live are so antithetical to mine that it’s difficult for us ever to think freely together.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 114</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;I find that most other men I know—especially if they happen to have run into me with one of my young girls—either silently judge me or openly preach to me. I am “a limited man,” they tell me—they who are not limited. And the preachers can get mad when I don’t recognize the truth of their argument. I am “smug,” they tell me—they who are not smug.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 115</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Whenever George opened his eyes, they propped him up and gave him water to sip and ice to suck on. Otherwise they kept him as comfortable as they could while he slipped away at an agonizingly slow pace.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 116</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;His mouth was aslant, hanging open, that stricken-looking mouth of the dying, but his eyes were focused and there even appeared to be something back of them, something of George that hadn’t yet given way. Like the wall left jaggedly standing after a bomb goes off.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 119</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Maybe that’s what everyone was celebrating—that it hadn’t come, never came, that the disaster of the end will now never arrive. All the disorder is controlled disorder punctuated with intervals to sell automobiles. TV doing what it does best: the triumph of trivialization over tragedy.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 145</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;From Sydney to Bethlehem to Times Square, the recirculating of clichés occurs at supersonic speeds. No bombs go off, no blood is shed—the next bang you hear will be the boom of prosperity and the explosion of markets. The slightest lucidity about the misery made ordinary by our era sedated by the grandiose stimulation of the grandest illusion. Watching this hyped-up production of staged pandemonium, I have a sense of the monied world eagerly entering the prosperous dark ages. A night of human happiness to usher in barbarism.com. To welcome appropriately the shit and the kitsch of the new millennium. A night not to remember but to forget.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 145</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;[…] for all of the Castillos’ Cuba that Castro had ruined, for everything she feared she was about to leave—all of it was so great that in my arms, for a full five minutes, Consuela went out of her mind.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 153</div></div><p>This is what the revolution wreaks, right? Those who benefit greatly from the system see themselves as basically good, hard-working, while everyone else is mysteriously poor or unworthy through their own doing. When the revolution hits, they feel they&rsquo;ve lost everything, rather than been lucky enough to have enjoyed a good life that they&rsquo;d only had because so many others didn&rsquo;t . They lost nothing; the library book that was their life was due back at the library. Instead of being happy that they were able to live so long on high, they lament that it&rsquo;s over and that now they&rsquo;re like everyone else. But even here, they ran away with their wealth and connections, keeping the book and whining that the library won&rsquo;t give them more.</p>
      </div>
      </div>
        <div class="footer">
    <div class="footer-data"><div class="footer-links"><ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/contact.php" title="">Contact</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/support.php" title="">Support</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/privacy.php" title="">Privacy</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/rights.php" title="">Rights</a></li></ul></div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="copyright">Copyright (c) 1999-2026 earthli.com. All Rights Reserved.</div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="versions">Powered by <ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore/app_news.php">earthli News 3.7</a></li><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore" title="">earthli WebCore&trade; 3.7</a></li></ul></div></div>    </div>
      </div>
  </div>  </body>
</html>
]]>
  </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
      <title type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[Cibola Burn by James S.A. Corey (2014) (read in 2021)]]>
  </title>
    <id>https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=4306</id>
    <link href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=4306"/>
    <updated>2022-02-02T00:00:34+01:00</updated>
    <author>
        <name type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[Marco von Ballmoos]]>
  </name>
      <uri>https://earthli.com/users/marco</uri>
    </author>
      <summary type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<p><small class="notes">Standard disclaimer [1]</small></p>
<p>This is the fourth book in <cite>The Expanse</cite> series. It follows the <cite>Rocinante</cite> to a planet called <cite>Ilus</cite> (colonists) or <cite>New Terra</cite> (U.N.). The Roci is sent there by Avasarala and Fred Johnson to settle the dispute between colonists and the official science and security team sent by the... [<a class="complete-text-link" href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=4306">More</a>]</p>
]]>
  </summary>
      <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<html lang="en">
  <head>
    <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/themes/ice.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/fonts/raleway.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/core/medium.css">
  </head>
  <body>
<div class="style-controls">  <div class="page">
    <div class="page-body">
<div class="info-box-top">
<p>
Published by <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_user.php?name=marco" title="Marco von Ballmoos" class="visible">marco</a> on <span class="date-time">2. Feb 2022 00:00:34 (GMT-5)</span>
</p>
</div>
      <div class="text-flow wide">
  <p><small class="notes">Standard disclaimer [1]</small></p>
<p>This is the fourth book in <cite>The Expanse</cite> series. It follows the <cite>Rocinante</cite> to a planet called <cite>Ilus</cite> (colonists) or <cite>New Terra</cite> (U.N.). The Roci is sent there by Avasarala and Fred Johnson to settle the dispute between colonists and the official science and security team sent by the U.N. </p>
<p>Basia Merton is a colonist, there with his wife Lucia, the colony&rsquo;s doctor and their daughter Felcia. The colonists are mainly Belters, who arrived on the <cite>Barbapiccola</cite>. They&rsquo;d managed to convert their bodies to be compatible with living on a planet and have started mining the planet&rsquo;s lithium. They think that they can stand on the law of &ldquo;first come, first served,&rdquo; but the U.N. is going to land and take everything away from them, claiming their right based on decisions and laws made in a complete other star system.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Somewhere out near the ring gates, the radio signals had passed each other, waves of electromagnetism passing through the void with human meanings coded into them. The distance it had taken a year and a half to travel in person, the message had managed in five hours. Five hours, and still too goddamn slow.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 117</div></div><p>There are colonists who are unhappy enough with this situation to want to disable the landing pad. Basia is one of them. However, just as they&rsquo;ve set up the charges and primed them, they hear that the shuttle from the U.N. ship <cite>Edward Israel</cite> is coming early. The explosives go off just as the shuttle is trying to land and it crashes, killing most of the passengers.</p>
<p>Exozoologist Elvi Okoye is on the shuttle and survives the crash, as does geohydraulicist Fayez Sarkis. Soon after, the dangerous and deadly security chief Murtry comes down to the surface. After the colonists kill most of the remaining RCE security personnel, Murtry is in his element. He&rsquo;s ready to whip the colonists off of the planet and will feel justified in doing so by any means necessary. He will, in fact, enjoy doing so immensely. Murtry engineers more and more control for himself, eventually even getting his second-in-command Havelock (Miller&rsquo;s former partner) to take over the<cite>Edward Israel</cite> from its captain. Down the well, Murtry starts eliminating suspected conspirators.</p>
<p>On the Rocinante, Holden is still dealing with visions of Miller, who&rsquo;s been able to maintain a connection to him because there&rsquo;s still a chunk of protomolecule stuck in one of the Roci&rsquo;s cargo holds. Miller is a piece of advanced software, with no other purpose than to act as an &ldquo;investigator&rdquo; for its master, also a piece of sophisticated software that has purpose, of a sort, but no intelligence. It works on instinct, on rules that apply to situations. It cannot do anything but the thing that it must do. The book described this mindless, vast intelligence that runs Miller&rsquo;s simulation as &ldquo;reaching out&rdquo;, seeking that which it seeks,</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;One imagines an insect’s leg twitching twitching twitching. One hears a spark closing a gap, the ticking so fast it becomes a drone. Another, oblivious, reexperiences her flesh falling from her bones, the nausea and fear, and begs for death as she has for years now. Her name is Maria. It does not let her die. It does not comfort her. It is unaware of her because it is unaware. But unaware is not inactive. It finds power where it can, nestled in a bath of low radiation. Tiny structures, smaller than atoms, harvest the energy of the fast-moving particles that pass through it. Subatomic windmills. It eats the void and it reaches out it reaches out it reaches out.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 41</div></div><p>It has no opinion on whether it will find that which it seeks. It doesn&rsquo;t matter either way. It can only be the way that it is. It does not pain it to keep going. It does not fear the end of its mission. It is instinct, the twitching of an insect&rsquo;s leg. Miller is an extension of it.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;If there had been a reply, it could end. If there had been anyone to answer, it would have come to rest like a marble at the bottom of a hill, but nothing answers. The scars know that no answer will ever come, but the reflex triggers the reflex triggers the reflex and it reaches out. It has solved a billion small puzzles already in cascades of reflex. It has no memory of having done so, except in its scars. There is only reaching out, delivering the message that its task is complete. Nothing answers, and so it cannot end. It reaches out. It is a complex mechanism for solving puzzles using what there is to be used.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 42</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;It will not stop until it makes that final connection, and it will never make that final connection. It stretches, tries new combinations, different ways to reach out, unaware that it is doing so. Unaware that it exists. Empty, except in the insignificant parts. The insectile leg will twitch forever. The scar that wails for death will wail forever. The investigator will search forever. The low voice will mutter forever.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 43</div></div><p>Although, maybe there is something like &ldquo;feelings&rdquo;, perhaps it can feel the difference between success and failure. How could it be otherwise? Even in a machine, there has to be something that makes it choose between a path that takes it further from accomplishing its mission and one that takes it closer. Maybe there is no better way to describe those incentives as &ldquo;inspiring hope&rdquo; or &ldquo;being happy&rdquo;. Positive feedback that encourages a particular direction. There is no need to avoid familiar formulations because they&rsquo;re as appropriate as anything else. There is no downside to anthropomorphism if it helps describe what&rsquo;s going on.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;It touches something, and for a moment, a part of it that can feel, feels hope. It is unaware of hope. The reply does not come. It is not over. It will never be over. It reaches out, and finds new things. Old things. It flows into places that are comfortable for it to flow. There are responses, and the responses feed the impulses that caused them, and there are more responses. All automatic and empty and dead as it is. Nothing reaches back. It feels no disappointment. It does not shut down. It reaches out.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 131</div></div><p>The Roci delivers Holden and Amos on the planet, with Alex and Naomi clearing out soon after and taking up station in orbit. Holden tries to ingratiate himself with both sides, as a negotiator. Amos squares off against Murtry.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;“I know who you are,” Amos said. The big man had been so quiet that both Murtry and Holden started with surprise.</p>
<p>&ldquo;“Who am I?” Murtry asked, playing along.</p>
<p>&ldquo;“A killer,” Amos said. His face was expressionless, his tone light. “You’ve got a nifty excuse and the shiny badge to make you seem right, but that’s not what this is about. You got off on smoking that guy in front of everyone. You can’t wait to do it again.”</p>
<p>&ldquo;“Is that right?” Murtry asked.</p>
<p>&ldquo;“Yeah. So, one killer to another, you don’t want to try that shit with us.”</p>
<p>&ldquo;“Amos, easy,” Holden warned, but the other two men ignored him.</p>
<p>&ldquo;“That sounded like a threat,” Murtry said.</p>
<p>&ldquo;“Oh, it really was,” Amos replied with a grin. Holden realized both men had their hands below the table.</p>
<p>&ldquo;“Hey, now.”</p>
<p>&ldquo;“I think maybe one of us is going to end bloody,” Murtry said.</p>
<p>&ldquo;“How about now?” Amos replied with a shrug. “I’m free now. We can just skip all the middle part.”&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 128</div></div><p>Holden engineers a compromise of sorts, allowing the colonists to continue processing lithium, but also not allowing the <cite>Barbapiccola</cite> to leave orbit. They will soon have other problems.</p>
<p>Meanwhile, Miller and the protomolecule&rsquo;s presence has begun waking up the many protomolecule-civilization&rsquo;s artifacts that lie scattered around the planet. Holden knows that this is no longer a planet on which they should try to live, but no-one wants to listen to reason and leave—neither the colonists nor the RCE. Basia is taken prisoner on board the Roci, where he is given free rein. His daughter Felcia is uploaded to the <cite>Barbapiccola</cite>. Naomi is taken prisoner by Havelock while on an EVA to disable something on the <cite>Edward Israel</cite>.</p>
<p>The planet continues to wake up. One of the moons melts. There are microorganisms in the air that take up residence in people&rsquo;s eyes and slowly start to blind everyone. The poison slugs aren&rsquo;t far behind. They&rsquo;ll follow the world-spanning tidal wave that forces everyone to take cover in one of the alien artifacts. Also, the artifacts have dampened fusion, so the ships in orbit are on battery power—and the <cite>Barbapiccola</cite> is in a degrading orbit. Things are going downhill.</p>
<p>On the surface, they all pull together to block off access to the poison slugs and to keep the water out. This, despite everyone but Holden going blind. He ends up doing most of the defense work, thanklessly, of course. Holden is protected by the anti-cancer meds he&rsquo;s been taken since the <cite>Eros</cite> incident.</p>
<p>With a cure for people&rsquo;s blindness underway, Holden takes off with Miller on a mission to find an … empty place in the protomolecule network, a place where the protomolecule can&rsquo;t go. It turns out to be their first encounter with a &ldquo;bullet&rdquo;, an otherdimensional and non-local &ldquo;weapon&rdquo; left behind by the civilization that eliminated the protomolecule civilization.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;It was hard to look at directly. The margins of the space were bright without illuminating anything or casting shadows, sharp and terrible. It reminded her of the way schizophrenics and people suffering migraines would describe light as assaulting and dangerous. And within that boundary, darkness swirled. It was more than an absence. She could sense a structure within it, layers interpenetrating, like shadows casting shadows. It throbbed with an inhuman power, tidal and deep and painful. Look at this too long, Elvi thought, and I will lose my mind in it.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 602</div></div><p>Murtry and Wei head off after Holden, tracking his position, but following in a cart instead of using the bizarre alien tube transport that Holden used. Amos and Elvi head out after them in another cart.</p>
<p>Meanwhile, in orbit, everyone is working on saving the <cite>Barbapiccola</cite> with a tether, a ton of ingenuity and no small amount of annoying personal drama and utterly depraved risk assessment (saving Felchia being deemed more important than losing both ships). Havelock is on the Roci, having released Naomi and accompanied her and Basia back there. Havelock&rsquo;s security team gets too big for their britches and launches an attack, but they&rsquo;re woefully underprepared and their attack fails. The crews of the <cite>Edward Israel</cite> and the <cite>Roci</cite> manage to rescue the <cite>Barbapiccola&rsquo;s</cite> holds, but the ship burns up in the atmosphere.</p>
<p>Back on the surface, Amos kills Wei, Murtry shoots Amos, Amos shoots Murtry, Fayez punches Murtry, Murtry shoots Fayez, Elvi runs off after Holden. Holden leaves her with Miller—embodied in a worker drone—to kill the &ldquo;bullet&rdquo; while he deals with Murtry, whom he shoots a few more times, but leaves alive.</p>
<p>Elvi and Miller fight against the bullet to subdue it and eventually manage to &ldquo;shut it off&rdquo;, but not before Elvi falls through it with Miller. Miller becomes the whole planet for a tiny while, but then, with his mission finally accomplished, he … disappears. Elvi loses … time. She survives, but doesn&rsquo;t know what to make of her experience.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;He connects, and the investigator becomes the world. He feels it everywhere. The orbital bases, the power cores in the crushing depth of the ocean, the library vaults where the old ones had lived, the signaling stations high in the mountains, the cities deep beneath the ground. He is the world.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 621</div></div><p>Fusion is back; the ships are back on full power. The <cite>Roci</cite> descends to the surface again to pick everyone up and get Amos into the autodoc. Murtry is also on board, as a prisoner. Holden and his crew, instead of failing—kind of as Avasarala and Johnson had hoped—have proven to the rest of the galaxy that colonization <em>does</em> work. Mars begins to empty out, as many of its colonists will give up on terraforming a planet when there a thousand with real atmospheres to choose from. The balance in Sol System has been disrupted.</p>
<p><hr></p>
<div class="footnote-reference"><span id="footnote_DRAFTABLE_ENTRY_4306_1_body" class="footnote-number">[1]</span> Disclaimer: these are notes I took while reading this book. They include citations I found interesting or enlightening or particularly well-written. In some cases, I&rsquo;ve pointed out which of these applies to which citation; in others, I have not. Any benefit you gain from reading these notes is purely incidental to the purpose they serve of reminding me of what I once read. Please see Wikipedia for a summary if I&rsquo;ve failed to provide one sufficient for your purposes. If my notes serve to trigger an interest in this book, then I&rsquo;m happy for you.</div><h2>Citations</h2><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;“Mars,” her brother said, “is the most studied planet there is. It doesn’t matter how many new datasets you get that aren’t about Mars. They aren’t about Mars! It’s like saying that seeing pictures of a thousand other tables will tell you about the one you’re already sitting at.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 6</div></div><p>It&rsquo;s An interesting argument. You already have more than enough to do here. Why go somewhere else? On the other hand, you can extrapolate solutions from lessons learned in other similar situations.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;“The contract with the shipyards came through. It should help us place a lot of vets in new jobs.”</p>
<p>&ldquo;“Because they’re building exploration ships and transports,” her nephew said. </p>
<p>&ldquo;“David.”</p>
<p>&ldquo;“Sorry, Mom. But they are,” David replied, not backing down.&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 6</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Because he doesn&rsquo;t question whether it&rsquo;s a good thing. All change is good if you&rsquo;re dissatisfied.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 6</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;She didn’t recognize their faces or the way their bodies moved. After a year and a half on the Israel, she knew everyone on sight, and these were strangers. The locals, then. The squatters. Illegals. The air smelled like burning dust and cumin.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 28</div></div><p>It&rsquo;s good to show that humans would of course impose a quasi-legal framework to transform that which others claim to be their own property, always through alienation, which works so well. Sharing is out of the question. Meins.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The supplies on the heavy shuttle—and the heavy shuttle itself—were gone. And the quiet that came over the Edward Israel was like the moment of shock between the impact of a blow and the pain. And then the rage and the grief. Not only the crew’s. Havelock’s too.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 34</div></div><p>They never thought of themselves as invaders, conquerors. The people on the planet were there, but had no significance. Theirs claims not worth considering or even knowing about. That they would strike to protect their claim unthinkable</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;They’re scientists. They looked on the squatters as an annoyance and a threat to their data. For most of them, this is outside their experience.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 37</div></div><p>Wonderful use of the slur to emphasize who&rsquo;s right and who&rsquo;s wrong.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;“So mostly they hate Earthers,” Murtry said.</p>
<p>&ldquo;“That’s what pulls them together. That thing where they’re oppressed by Earth is just about the one thing they have in common. So they cultivate it. Hating people like us is what makes them them.”</p>
<p>&ldquo;Murtry nodded. “You know there are people that would call you prejudiced for saying that.”</p>
<p>&ldquo;“It’s only prejudice when you haven’t been there,” Havelock said. “I was on Ceres Station just before it broke for the OPA. For me, it’s all lived experience.”</p>
<p>&ldquo;“Well, I think you’re right,” Murtry said.&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 39</div></div><p>Very nicely expressed lowbrow estimation of an enemy. Their hatred is unkennable, so you don&rsquo;t have to bother even looking for reason. Just kill them before they kill you.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;“But we have the charter. We have a right to be here.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 40</div></div><p>Don&rsquo;t you always. Doesn&rsquo;t the empire/occupier always make sure to dot its i&rsquo;s and cross its t&rsquo;s.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;One imagines an insect’s leg twitching twitching twitching. One hears a spark closing a gap, the ticking so fast it becomes a drone. Another, oblivious, reexperiences her flesh falling from her bones, the nausea and fear, and begs for death as she has for years now. Her name is Maria. It does not let her die. It does not comfort her. It is unaware of her because it is unaware. But unaware is not inactive. It finds power where it can, nestled in a bath of low radiation. Tiny structures, smaller than atoms, harvest the energy of the fast-moving particles that pass through it. Subatomic windmills. It eats the void and it reaches out it reaches out it reaches out.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 41</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;If there had been a reply, it could end. If there had been anyone to answer, it would have come to rest like a marble at the bottom of a hill, but nothing answers. The scars know that no answer will ever come, but the reflex triggers the reflex triggers the reflex and it reaches out. It has solved a billion small puzzles already in cascades of reflex. It has no memory of having done so, except in its scars. There is only reaching out, delivering the message that its task is complete. Nothing answers, and so it cannot end. It reaches out. It is a complex mechanism for solving puzzles using what there is to be used.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 42</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;It will not stop until it makes that final connection, and it will never make that final connection. It stretches, tries new combinations, different ways to reach out, unaware that it is doing so. Unaware that it exists. Empty, except in the insignificant parts. The insectile leg will twitch forever. The scar that wails for death will wail forever. The investigator will search forever. The low voice will mutter forever.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 43</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Now their conversations were so careful, it was like the words all had glass bones. So he changed the topic.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 64</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;“You know what I love about this planet?” Fayez said instead of hello.</p>
<p>&ldquo;“Nothing?”</p>
<p>&ldquo;He scowled at her, feigning hurt feelings. “I love the period of rotation. Thirty hours. You can get in a full day’s work, stay up getting drunk at the saloon, and still get a full night’s sleep. I don’t know why we didn’t think of this back home.”&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 70</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;“That’s speculation,” Elvi said. “Nothing in the fossil record indicates that there was more than the one beginning of life on Earth. We don’t get to just make things up because they sound good.”</p>
<p>&ldquo;“Elvi is very comfortable with mysteries,” Fayez said to Felcia with a wink. “It’s why she has a hard time relating with those of us who feel anxious with our ignorance.”</p>
<p>&ldquo;“Well, you can’t know everything,” Elvi said, making it a joke to hide a tinge of discomfort.&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 90</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Somewhere out near the ring gates, the radio signals had passed each other, waves of electromagnetism passing through the void with human meanings coded into them. The distance it had taken a year and a half to travel in person, the message had managed in five hours. Five hours, and still too goddamn slow.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 117</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;“I know who you are,” Amos said. The big man had been so quiet that both Murtry and Holden started with surprise.</p>
<p>&ldquo;“Who am I?” Murtry asked, playing along.</p>
<p>&ldquo;“A killer,” Amos said. His face was expressionless, his tone light. “You’ve got a nifty excuse and the shiny badge to make you seem right, but that’s not what this is about. You got off on smoking that guy in front of everyone. You can’t wait to do it again.”</p>
<p>&ldquo;“Is that right?” Murtry asked.</p>
<p>&ldquo;“Yeah. So, one killer to another, you don’t want to try that shit with us.”</p>
<p>&ldquo;“Amos, easy,” Holden warned, but the other two men ignored him.</p>
<p>&ldquo;“That sounded like a threat,” Murtry said.</p>
<p>&ldquo;“Oh, it really was,” Amos replied with a grin. Holden realized both men had their hands below the table.</p>
<p>&ldquo;“Hey, now.”</p>
<p>&ldquo;“I think maybe one of us is going to end bloody,” Murtry said.</p>
<p>&ldquo;“How about now?” Amos replied with a shrug. “I’m free now. We can just skip all the middle part.”&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 128</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;It touches something, and for a moment, a part of it that can feel, feels hope. It is unaware of hope. The reply does not come. It is not over. It will never be over. It reaches out, and finds new things. Old things. It flows into places that are comfortable for it to flow. There are responses, and the responses feed the impulses that caused them, and there are more responses. All automatic and empty and dead as it is. Nothing reaches back. It feels no disappointment. It does not shut down. It reaches out.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 131</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;“You,” Lucia said, “took yourself away when you joined with those stupid violent people who blew up the shuttle. You drove them out to the ruins when they killed the RCE people. You made every choice that took you to this place. I love you, Basia Merton. I love you till my chest aches. But you are a stupid, stupid man. And when they take you away from me, I will not forgive you for it.”</p>
<p>&ldquo;“You’re a harsh woman.”</p>
<p>&ldquo;“I’m a doctor,” Lucia said. “I’m used to giving people bad news.”&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 136</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;“Part of the reason I came out here, part of the reason I agreed to this, was that we were going to do it right,” Elvi said, hearing the stress coming into her voice. “We were going to get a sealed environment. A dome. We were going to survey the planet and learn from it and be responsible about how we treated it. The RCE sent scientists. They sent researchers. Do you know how many of us have sustainability and conservation certifications? Five-sixths. Five-sixths.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 150</div></div><p>And the military elements declare martial law.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;“Uh, Captain?” the huge baby-man said.</p>
<p>&ldquo;“Amos?”</p>
<p>&ldquo;“There’s another mess of legal crap just came through from the UN for you.”</p>
<p>&ldquo;Holden sighed. “Am I supposed to read it?”</p>
<p>&ldquo;“Don’t see how they can make you,” Amos said. “Just thought you’d want to ignore it intentionally.”&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 151</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Miller ignored him. “An empty apartment, a missing family, that’s creepy. But this is like finding a military base with no one on it. Fighters and tanks idling on the runway with no drivers. This is bad juju. Something wrong happened here. What you should do is tell everyone to leave.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 163</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The monster from the desert shifted drunkenly, its legs awkward. Its one functioning arm twisted toward them, then collapsed to the ground. Its body shifted and trembled as it tried to lift it again.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 180</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;An hour later, the great ruddy disk of the sun touched the horizon. The flames danced around the thing’s corpse, rising up higher than a bonfire. Greasy black smoke spiraled up toward the clouds, and the whole world seemed to reek of accelerants. Wei had taken a small tent from the loader’s storage, and Fayez had set it up. Elvi stood, the heat of the sun and the fire pressing against her face. The night was going to be long.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 182</div></div><p>This scene with the rifle and the stupidity and incomprehension and deliberate ignorance accompanied by an unearned confidence and sense of superiority calls to mind aboriginals who&rsquo;ve managed to kill one of the occupier&rsquo;s dogs.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;They sent out bridge builders to use those basic biological replicators, whatever their form. They can take a biosphere and turn it into a massively networked factory. It’s probably how they spread. Target the places that can be hijacked into making the things that let you get there. Also, they really built structures to last. They seem to have taken the long view on galactic colonizing.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 184</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;They hadn’t pissed in his locker, mostly because it hadn’t occurred to them.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 220</div></div><p>No. Because they don&rsquo;t waste water.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Holden had grown up in the Montana district of North America. A region filled with nostalgia for lost frontiers. It had held out against urban creep longer than most places in the former United States. The people there clung to their farms and ranches even when those things stopped making economic sense.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 255</div></div><p>This is so frustrating. It&rsquo;s this twisted logic where all of the beautiful places die because they stop making economic sense. This is a lie. The economy is not a mindless machine. It is steered. Steered by the rich to become more rich. Everyone else can either become like them…or die.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Did the people up there think about how momentous what they were all doing was? Holden worried that they didn’t. That the strangeness had already become normal, like the night scents of Ilus. That all they saw now was the conflict to be won and the treasure to be harvested.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 256</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;[…] the fact had become as invisible to him as someone on Earth thinking about being held to a spinning celestial object by nothing more than mass, shielded from the fusion reaction of the sun by only distance and air. It wasn’t something you thought about until it was a problem.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 404</div></div><p>Mostly the magnetosphere, not the air.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Something was here once. Something built all this, and left its meal half eaten on the table. The designers and engineers that spanned a thousand worlds had lived here and died here and left behind the everyday wonders like bones in the desert. The investigator knows this. The world is a crime scene, and the one thing that stands out—the one thing that doesn’t belong—is the place that nothing goes. It’s an artifact in a world of artifacts, but it doesn’t fit. What would they put in a place they couldn’t reach? Is it a prison, a treasure chest, a question that isn’t supposed to be asked?&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 510</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;“There’s a damaged piece of the system ahead,” Miller continued, “and I’d hoped we’d be able to get around it. No such luck. We’re on foot from here.”</p>
<p>&ldquo;“Your fancy alien train is broken?”</p>
<p>&ldquo;“My fancy alien material transfer system has been sitting unused for over a billion years and half the planet just exploded. Your ship was built less than a decade ago and you can barely keep the coffee pot running.”</p>
<p>&ldquo;“You are a sad, bitter little man,” Holden said as he climbed to his feet and pushed against the train door. It didn’t open.&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 549</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;About the time one-celled organisms on Earth were starting to think about maybe trying photosynthesis, something turned this whole damned planet off. Took it off the grid, and killed everything high enough up the food chain to have an opinion. If I’m right, the thing that did that’s not entirely gone. Every time something reaches into this one particular place, it dies.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 554</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;So, as far I can figure it, there are minerals native to this system that are fairly rare, galactically speaking.”</p>
<p>&ldquo;“Lithium.”</p>
<p>&ldquo;“That’s one,” Miller agreed. “This planet is a gas station. Process the ore, refine it, send it down to the power plants, then beam the collected energy out.”</p>
<p>&ldquo;“To where?”</p>
<p>&ldquo;“To wherever. There are lots of worlds like this one, and they all fed the grid. Not the rings, though. I still don’t know how they powered those.”&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 557</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;“I’m not cutting it,” he said again, more to himself than anyone else. Cutting it meant letting the Barb drift away, down into the upper atmosphere to rip apart and burn. To let Felcia burn. Alex had promised not to let that happen.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 582</div></div><p>Idiots like this don&rsquo;t deserve the win the author will give them.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;It was hard to look at directly. The margins of the space were bright without illuminating anything or casting shadows, sharp and terrible. It reminded her of the way schizophrenics and people suffering migraines would describe light as assaulting and dangerous. And within that boundary, darkness swirled. It was more than an absence. She could sense a structure within it, layers interpenetrating, like shadows casting shadows. It throbbed with an inhuman power, tidal and deep and painful. Look at this too long, Elvi thought, and I will lose my mind in it.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 602</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Cells became molecules—countless and complex and varied. The demarcation of one thing and another failed. There was only a community of molecules, shifting in a vast dance. And then the atoms that made the molecules gave up their space, and she was a breath. A mist. A tiny play of fields and interactions in a vacuum as perfect as space. She was a vibration in nothingness.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 619</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;He connects, and the investigator becomes the world. He feels it everywhere. The orbital bases, the power cores in the crushing depth of the ocean, the library vaults where the old ones had lived, the signaling stations high in the mountains, the cities deep beneath the ground. He is the world.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 621</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;“No, what I want is Ceres Station or Earth or Mars. You know what they have in New York? All-night diners with greasy food and crap coffee. I want to live on a world with all-night diners. And racetracks. And instant-delivery Thai food made from something I haven’t already eaten seven times in the last month.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 632</div></div>      </div>
      </div>
        <div class="footer">
    <div class="footer-data"><div class="footer-links"><ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/contact.php" title="">Contact</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/support.php" title="">Support</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/privacy.php" title="">Privacy</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/rights.php" title="">Rights</a></li></ul></div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="copyright">Copyright (c) 1999-2026 earthli.com. All Rights Reserved.</div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="versions">Powered by <ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore/app_news.php">earthli News 3.7</a></li><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore" title="">earthli WebCore&trade; 3.7</a></li></ul></div></div>    </div>
      </div>
  </div>  </body>
</html>
]]>
  </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
      <title type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[Automation and the Future of Work by Aaron Benanav (2020) (read in 2021)]]>
  </title>
    <id>https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=4305</id>
    <link href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=4305"/>
    <updated>2022-01-31T23:37:47+01:00</updated>
    <author>
        <name type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[Marco von Ballmoos]]>
  </name>
      <uri>https://earthli.com/users/marco</uri>
    </author>
      <summary type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<p><small class="notes">Standard disclaimer [1]</small></p>
<p>This book argues that the paucity of good jobs these days is due not to a rise in automation, but to a massive decrease in manufacturing output. That is, slow growth rates coupled with a system-wide overcapacity are a much better fit for explaining how we got to where we are... [<a class="complete-text-link" href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=4305">More</a>]</p>
]]>
  </summary>
      <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<html lang="en">
  <head>
    <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/themes/ice.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/fonts/raleway.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/core/medium.css">
  </head>
  <body>
<div class="style-controls">  <div class="page">
    <div class="page-body">
<div class="info-box-top">
<p>
Published by <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_user.php?name=marco" title="Marco von Ballmoos" class="visible">marco</a> on <span class="date-time">31. Jan 2022 23:37:47 (GMT-5)</span>
</p>
</div>
      <div class="text-flow wide">
  <p><small class="notes">Standard disclaimer [1]</small></p>
<p>This book argues that the paucity of good jobs these days is due not to a rise in automation, but to a massive decrease in manufacturing output. That is, slow growth rates coupled with a system-wide overcapacity are a much better fit for explaining how we got to where we are today: economies in the west with ostensibly very low unemployment, but largely in the service industry with a much different benefits structure than past jobs.</p>
<p>Benanav sees a <abbr title="Universal Basic Income">UBI</abbr> as a means to an end, but that end has to be getting beyond the kind of civilization that forced us to invent a UBI in the first place. UBI is a band-aid on a broken system. Yes, it will make things better for the lower classes, but it won&rsquo;t do anything about <em>there even being lower classes at all</em>. Settling for a UBI is aiming too <em>low</em>. If we lived in a world where a UBI was possible, then much more would also be possible.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;For them, UBI serves as a bridge to “fully automated luxury communism,” a term Aaron Bastani coined in 2014 to name a possible goal of socialist politics. This term flourished for five years as a meme before Bastani’s book—outlining an automated future in which artificial intelligence, solar power, gene editing, asteroid mining, and lab-grown meat generate a world of limitless leisure and self-invention—finally appeared. It provided a much-needed counterweight to left-wing rhetorics of collective self-sacrifice and anti-consumerist austerity.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 18</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;While UBI has the laudable goal of separating the income people earn from the amount of work they do, it would do nothing to alter the relation between income and assets, keeping us tethered to a system in which a sizable fraction of total income derives from interest (from extending credit), rent (from leasing land or homes), and profit (from running businesses). In other words, UBI would empower workers without disempowering capital, providing people more autonomy in the fulfillment of their “animal functions” but no greater role in shaping the wider social conditions under which they do so.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 97</div></div><p>Still, I&rsquo;m not convinced we can afford the luxury of that fantasy. Without it, though, we&rsquo;re doomed to be highly diminished but we&rsquo;re determined to drive right into the brick wall without slowing down. We&rsquo;ve passed the point where we can have the nice version. That way is now blocked by past heedlessness and greed. We don&rsquo;t know how to slow down, so the only way forward is crash.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Our present reality is better described by near-future science fiction dystopias than by standard economic analysis; ours is a hot planet, with micro-drones flying over the heads of the street hawkers and rickshaw pullers, where the rich live in guarded, climate-controlled communities while the rest of us while away our time in dead-end jobs, playing video games on smartphones. We need to slip out of this timeline and into another.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 26</div></div><p>Since we&rsquo;ve overall stopped producing new things, we&rsquo;re stuck financializing everything and pushing money upward to a tiny elite. China grew, but it did so by cannibalizing existing markets, by <em>replacing</em> existing capacity. The standard productivity story is muddled by the fact that we&rsquo;re not really manufacturing goods anymore and have instead moved into pure services.</p>
<p>The current trend is to reimagine new territory in so-called metaverses. Instead of escaping the planet to travel to Mars, people are now just trying to escape anywhere, even virtual places. The clever ones are capitalizing on this to sell people nothing for something, transforming fairy tales into real assets and actually usable liquidity.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;From the 2008 crisis up to 2014, manufacturing output expanded at just 1.6 percent per year, on a world scale—that is, at less than a quarter of the pace achieved during the post-war “golden age.” <strong>It is worth noting that these figures include the dramatic expansion of manufacturing productive capacity in China.</strong>&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 37</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;in spite of system-wide over-capacity and slow growth rates, China has industrialized rapidly because its firms have been able to take market share away from other firms—not only in the United States, but also in countries like Mexico and Brazil. It could not have been otherwise. In an environment where average growth rates are low, <strong>firms can only achieve high rates of growth by taking market share from their competitors.</strong>&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 43</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;[…] as rates of manufacturing-output growth stagnated in one country after another from the 1970s onward, <strong>no other sector appeared on the scene to replace industry as a major economic-growth engine.</strong> Instead, the slowdown in manufacturing-output growth rates was accompanied by a slowdown in overall GDP growth rates.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 44</div></div><p>Benanav posits the interesting theory that many other economists see the glass as half-full—productivity is improving all the time!—whereas the more likely reason is that output growth rates have fallen. </p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The demand for labor is determined by the gap between productivity and output growth rates. Reading the shrinkage of this gap the wrong way around—that is, as due to rising productivity rather than falling output rates—is what generates the upside-down world of the automation discourse.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 55</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;In making this leap, the automation theorists miss the true story that explains this phenomenon: overcrowded global markets for manufactures, declining rates of investment in fixed capital, and a corresponding economic slowdown.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 56</div></div><p>This leads to an interesting economy, rife with fairy tales that form the superstructure on which everything else sits. We&rsquo;ve known this for a long time: the unemployment rate stays low because of outright manipulation—countries don&rsquo;t like to count all the kinds of people who aren&rsquo;t actually working—but also because a lot of people can be counted as <em>technically employed</em> even though they&rsquo;re underemployed (not enough hours) or underutilized (not using their skills/talents).</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Governments have generally responded to this persistently low demand for labor not by promoting work sharing among the employed, but rather by reducing workers’ access to unemployment benefits—pushing job losers to take whatever work was available, even at the cost of lost wages and degraded skills.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 64</div></div><p>Into this whole mess of service-worker jobs is the whole pivot to an entrepreneur economy, the so-called gig economy. A world of hustlers that give up working for &ldquo;the man&rdquo; from 9–5 and &ldquo;live the dream&rdquo; as self-employed people who now work 24–7, with much more complicated taxes, no insurance, no pension, no nothing. They just have the freedom to have converted the thing they actually loved doing into a job.</p>
<p>Benanav notes that 10% of workers were working like this in 2017, but that number is up to 34%, just four years later.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Some firms do utilize alternative working arrangements to get around US labor law—witness the small but significant boom in gig-economy jobs, like Uber and Lyft, which offer work through online platforms as a way of disguising their employees as independent contractors. But when all is said and done, just 10 percent of US workers were employed in such arrangements in 2017, including as independent contractors, on-call workers, temp agency workers, and fixed-contract workers.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 67</div></div><p>Throw this outright mess of an economy—built by parasites over the last four, or now five, decades—into a pandemic and see what happens. Central banks all over the world—but most especially the U.S. Fed—poured trillions into the economy, right where it was needed most, of course. We see the result after two years: mega-corporations have become even bigger, growing to insane valuations; consolidation and merging everywhere; a handful of lottery winners with 99.9% losers, for the most part. We spent all of that money and just <em>gave</em> it to the richest people and corporations on the planet, trusting them to do something good with it. They put it in their pockets, for the most part, and neglected to reinvest it in a crumbling infrastructure. A pity that.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;These trends suggest that the apocalyptic crisis of labor market dysfunction anticipated by automation theorists will not take place. Instead, unemployment will continue to spike during downturns—as we are seeing happen once again, and on a truly massive scale, in the present COVID-19 recession. Then, in the course of the tepid boom periods that follow, this unemployment will slowly but surely resolve itself into higher levels of underemployment and rising inequality.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 81</div></div><p>Give that man a cigar. That is exactly what happened/is happening. He wrote this book at the beginning of the pandemic. In over a year since publication, things have unfolded pretty much exactly according to the script outlined above.</p>
<p>Although we&rsquo;ve heard a lot about the &ldquo;great resignation&rdquo; and &ldquo;Striketober&rdquo;, the needle hasn&rsquo;t really moved very much on union activity—or membership. That&rsquo;s unfortunate. Wildcat strikes have their place and can be roughly effective, but real progress can only be made with <em>organized</em> labor, putting constant and unremitting pressure. Corporations  are organized and together. Labor should be too. Of course, a better system would make labor part of the ownership class, but we&rsquo;re getting ahead of ourselves here. Union numbers are falling every year—what are the odds that worker-owned cooperatives are about to shoot out of the ground?</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;To struggle against the labor market forces that are making people so miserable would require a substantial shift in labor’s capacity to press its interests. Yet over time, the organized sector of the labor force has receded. Union density across the OECD declined from 30 percent of the workforce in 1985 to 16 percent in 2016; the share of workers covered by collective bargaining fell from 45 percent to 32 percent over the same period.53 Global union density fell even lower, weighing in at approximately 7 percent in 2014.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 82</div></div><p>The struggle is always the same: once people are forced into desperate circumstances, they narrow their focus to the welfare of only themselves and their closest family and friends. It&rsquo;s only the rare individual that&rsquo;s willing to declare solidarity with others if it means increasing their own suffering. And we aren&rsquo;t even talking about suffering, really. People will sell one another out for a 5% raise, even if they don&rsquo;t really need it. The ruling class has figured out how to create <em>need</em> and use it as a lever to keep people apart, operating autonomously—and against each other.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;In sluggish economies periodically wracked by austerity, it is easier to blame the resulting social deterioration on vulnerable sections of the workforce—immigrants, women, racial and religious minorities—than to unite around a new, emancipatory social project.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 82</div></div><p>We figured this out a century ago or, rather, Keynes figured it out for us. He predicted that productivity would increase so much that we&rsquo;d only be working about 15 hours per week. This is what economists today say is about what we would need to work if we were to distribute labor and resources justly. But, we don&rsquo;t.</p>
<p>I wonder, though, whether everyone working less would lower advancements in technology, medicine, etc. Or maybe we would just work 15 hours per week and then just work more, but in our free time. Or maybe we would read more or write better—instead of churning out junk that&rsquo;s just barely good enough to fool people into buying it—or maybe create music that&rsquo;s unique and actually good. This is the kind of book this is: it gets you thinking about what the real alternatives could be, and maybe dreaming a bit what it would be like were they to come to fruition.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Under conditions of economic maturity, Keynes said, it would make more sense to intervene to shrink the labor supply rather than to stimulate labor demand, increasing leisure rather than output. Given a long-term decline in returns to private investment, Keynes suggested, the work-week might have to be reduced to fifteen hours—and even that was only to satisfy the “old Adam” in us—that is, the need to feel useful.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 87</div></div><p>Benanav doesn&rsquo;t just list problems; he also proposes interesting solutions. It seems really hard to see how we get there from where we are—can you imagine anyone trying to run a society on &ldquo;human dignity&rdquo;?—but we can&rsquo;t get to any goal that we can&rsquo;t imagine and describe.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Instead of presupposing a fully automated economy and imagining the possibilities for a better and freer world created out of it, we could begin from a world of generalized human dignity, and then consider the technical changes needed to realize that world.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 100</div></div><p>For example, the following proposed system (from 1888!) rewards <span class="quote-inline">&ldquo;skilled work&rdquo;</span> with a <span class="quote-inline">&ldquo;lesser labor contribution&rdquo;</span>. However, as I noted above, I wonder how society functions when those who are the most skilled work the least. I know that it would work somehow, but it&rsquo;s so different that it&rsquo;s hard to imagine. Perhaps that&rsquo;s why they say that it&rsquo;s easier to imagine the end of the world than the end of capitalism.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Utopian writer Edward Bellamy proposed one way to organize the division of labor in a post-scarcity society in his novel Looking Backward (1888). There, <strong>the supply and demand for labor determine how many hours people work, rather than how high a salary they earn. Skilled work is rewarded with a lesser labor contribution rather than higher pay</strong>, while the performance of risky or especially difficult labors earn an honorific—a kind of celebrity. As across societies today, which differ in their institutional preferences for general education or vocational training, there need not be a single solution to this problem, as long as the division of labor neither leaves important tasks undone, nor reproduces an elite class of technicians.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 105</div></div><p>No matter what we do, though, we should decide it democratically. Letting &ldquo;the market decide&rdquo; is just code for letting &ldquo;rich people decide&rdquo;. Again, this is not going to be offered to us. As Frederick Douglass said, <span class="quote-inline">&ldquo;Power concedes nothing without a demand. It never did and it never will.&rdquo;</span></p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;In any case, <strong>such questions would be settled by human beings’ collective determination</strong> of what they want to do, rather than decided for us by supposedly unstoppable technological forces.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 106</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;In such a world, there could still be sanctions to ensure that necessary work is actually undertaken. However, inducements to work would not take the form of threats of starvation, but invitations to cooperate. Economists have long recognized that hunger and homelessness are not the best motivators. Even in Kropotkin’s time, economists admitted that <strong>“the best situation for man is when he produces in freedom, has choice in his occupations, has no overseer to impede him, and when he sees his work bring a profit to himself and others like him.”</strong>&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 107</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Under these conditions, &ldquo;creative minds and scientific aptitudes&rdquo; would no longer be &ldquo;wasted due to accidents of birthplace, the bad luck of challenging circumstances, or the necessity to survive.&rdquo; <strong>Funding for research or art would also no longer be determined by the profit motive, or dictated by the interests of the wealthy.</strong>&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 109</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Recognition of the fundamental dignity of the 7 billion plus who make up humanity requires that we <strong>no longer agree to relegate some to a life of drudgery so that others may be free.</strong> It means we must share out the work that remains to be done in a technologically advanced society, so that everyone has the right and the power to decide what to do with their time.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 111</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Unless social struggles organize themselves around this historic task, the conquest of production, they will not break through to a new synthesis of what it means to be a human being—<strong>to live in a world devoid of poverty and billionaires, of stateless refugees and detention camps, and of lives spent in drudgery, which hardly offer a moment to rest, let alone dream.</strong>&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 117</div></div><p><hr></p>
<div class="footnote-reference"><span id="footnote_DRAFTABLE_ENTRY_4305_1_body" class="footnote-number">[1]</span> Disclaimer: these are notes I took while reading this book. They include citations I found interesting or enlightening or particularly well-written. In some cases, I&rsquo;ve pointed out which of these applies to which citation; in others, I have not. Any benefit you gain from reading these notes is purely incidental to the purpose they serve of reminding me of what I once read. Please see Wikipedia for a summary if I&rsquo;ve failed to provide one sufficient for your purposes. If my notes serve to trigger an interest in this book, then I&rsquo;m happy for you.</div><h2>Citations</h2><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Put on the reality-vision glasses of John Carpenter’s <em>They Live</em>, which allowed the protagonist of that film to see the truth in advertising, and it is easy to see a world not of shiny new automated factories and ping-pong-playing consumer robots, but of crumbling infrastructures, deindustrialized cities, harried nurses, and underpaid salespeople, as well as a massive stock of financialized capital with dwindling places to invest itself.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 9</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;As I read book after book by the automation theorists, supplementing that still-growing reading list with forays into the utopian and science fiction literatures of the past, the conviction grew within me that, collectively, these authors had done more than anyone I have yet encountered to think through the logical organization of a post-capitalist society and to imagine the pathways by which we might get there.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 12</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;For them, UBI serves as a bridge to “fully automated luxury communism,” a term Aaron Bastani coined in 2014 to name a possible goal of socialist politics. This term flourished for five years as a meme before Bastani’s book—outlining an automated future in which artificial intelligence, solar power, gene editing, asteroid mining, and lab-grown meat generate a world of limitless leisure and self-invention—finally appeared. It provided a much-needed counterweight to left-wing rhetorics of collective self-sacrifice and anti-consumerist austerity.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 18</div></div><p>I&rsquo;m honestly not convinced we can afford the luxury of that fantasy. Without it, though, we&rsquo;re doomed to be highly diminished but we&rsquo;re determined to drive right into the brick wall without slowing down. We&rsquo;ve passed the point where we can have the nice version. That way is now blocked by past heedlessness and greed. We don&rsquo;t know how to slow down, so the only way forward is crash.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;I will also criticize the critics—both for providing alternative explanations of a persistently low labor demand that apply only in high-income countries, and for failing to produce anything like a radical vision of social change adequate to the scale of the global labor underdemand problem, which has already beset the world economy for a long time and, due to COVID-19, is likely to worsen in years to come. It should be said from the outset that I am more sympathetic to the left wing of the automation discourse than to any of its critics.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 24</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;In a world reeling from a global pandemic, rising inequality, recalcitrant neoliberalism, resurgent ethnonationalism, and the looming threat of climate change, automation theorists have tried to push through the catastrophe with a vision of an emancipated future, one in which humanity advances to the next stage in our history—whatever we might take that to mean—and technology helps to free us all to discover and follow our passions. That is true in spite of the fact that, as with many of the utopias of the past, these visions need to be freed from their authors’ technocratic fantasies as to how constructive social change might take place.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 25</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Our present reality is better described by near-future science fiction dystopias than by standard economic analysis; ours is a hot planet, with micro-drones flying over the heads of the street hawkers and rickshaw pullers, where the rich live in guarded, climate-controlled communities while the rest of us while away our time in dead-end jobs, playing video games on smartphones. We need to slip out of this timeline and into another.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 26</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;[…] official US manufacturing growth-rate statistics are vastly overinflated, since they log the production of computers with higher processing speeds as equivalent to the production of more computers. For that reason, government statistics suggest that productivity levels in the computers and electronics subsector rose at a galloping average annual rate of over 10 percent per year between 1987 and 2011, even as productivity growth rates outside of that subsector fell to around 2 percent per year over the same period.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 31</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;As industrial output growth rates fell below corresponding productivity growth rates in country after country, quantitative declines in economic indicators became qualitative in their effects: manufacturing employment shares fell progressively. Worsening economic stagnation thus combined with a limited technological dynamism to generate labor’s global deindustrialization&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 34</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;From the 2008 crisis up to 2014, manufacturing output expanded at just 1.6 percent per year, on a world scale—that is, at less than a quarter of the pace achieved during the post-war “golden age.” It is worth noting that these figures include the dramatic expansion of manufacturing productive capacity in China.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 37</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;More and more is produced with fewer workers, as the automation theorists claim, but not because technological change has given rise to high rates of productivity growth. Far from it—productivity growth in manufacturing has appeared rapid only because the yardstick of output growth, against which it is measured, has been shrinking. Following economist Robert Brenner, I argue that global waves of deindustrialization find their origins not in runaway technical change, but first and foremost in a worsening overcapacity in world markets for manufactured goods.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 38</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Deindustrialization was a matter not only of technological advance, but also of global redundancy of productive and technological capacities. In more crowded international markets, rapid rates of industrial expansion became more difficult to achieve.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 40</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Everywhere, depressed prices for manufactures led to falling income-per-unit capital ratios (falling capital productivity), then to falling rates of profit, then to lower rates of investment, and finally to lower output growth rates. In this environment, firms faced heightened competition for market share: as overall growth rates slowed, the only way for new firms to grow quickly was to steal market shares from established firms.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 40</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Facing competition on prices, US multinational corporations (MNCs) built international supply chains, shifting the more labor-intensive components of their production processes abroad and playing suppliers against one another to achieve the best prices. In the mid ’60s the first export-processing zones opened in Taiwan and South Korea. Even Silicon Valley, which formerly produced its computer chips locally in the San Jose area, shifted its production to low-wage areas, using lower grades of technology while benefiting from laxer laws around pollution and workers’ safety.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 41</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;in spite of system-wide over-capacity and slow growth rates, China has industrialized rapidly because its firms have been able to take market share away from other firms—not only in the United States, but also in countries like Mexico and Brazil. It could not have been otherwise. In an environment where average growth rates are low, firms can only achieve high rates of growth by taking market share from their competitors.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 43</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;[…] as rates of manufacturing-output growth stagnated in one country after another from the 1970s onward, no other sector appeared on the scene to replace industry as a major economic-growth engine. Instead, the slowdown in manufacturing-output growth rates was accompanied by a slowdown in overall GDP growth rates.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 44</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Instead of a reallocation of workers from low-productivity jobs to high-productivity ones, the reverse takes place. Workers pool in low-productivity jobs, mostly in the service sector. As countries have deindustrialized, they have also seen a massive buildup of financialized capital, chasing returns to the ownership of relatively liquid assets rather than investing long-term in new fixed capital.12 In spite of the high degree of overcapacity in industry, there is nowhere more profitable in the real economy for capital to invest itself. If there had been, we would have evidence of it in higher rates of capital accumulation and hence higher GDP growth rates. Instead, what we see is ongoing disinvestment—with corporations using idle cash to buy back their own shares or pay out dividends—and falling long-term interest rates, as the supply of loanable funds far outstrips demand.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 51</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The demand for labor is determined by the gap between productivity and output growth rates. Reading the shrinkage of this gap the wrong way around—that is, as due to rising productivity rather than falling output rates—is what generates the upside-down world of the automation discourse.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 55</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;In making this leap, the automation theorists miss the true story that explains this phenomenon: overcrowded global markets for manufactures, declining rates of investment in fixed capital, and a corresponding economic slowdown.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 56</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Rather than focus on generating advances in artificial general intelligence, engineers at Facebook spend their time studying slot machines to figure out how to get people addicted to their website, so that they keep coming back to check for notifications, post content, and view advertisements. The result is that, like all modern technologies, these digital offerings are far from “socially neutral.” The internet, as developed by the US government and shaped by capitalist enterprises, is not the only internet that could exist.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 57</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;in the 1980s, the majority of the world’s workers were still in agriculture; by 2018 that figure had fallen to 28 percent. Thus, the major destroyer of livelihoods in the twentieth century was not “silicon capitalism” but nitrogen capitalism.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 58</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Under the pressure of decelerating economic growth, the mode in which labor underdemand expresses itself has shifted: from unemployment to a variety of forms of chronic underemployment, which are more difficult to measure.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 63</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Governments have generally responded to this persistently low demand for labor not by promoting work sharing among the employed, but rather by reducing workers’ access to unemployment benefits—pushing job losers to take whatever work was available, even at the cost of lost wages and degraded skills.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 64</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Written over 150 years ago, Marx’s analysis has become contemporary once again. In the slow-growing economies of the past few decades, job losers have been obliged to join new labor market entrants in low-quality jobs—earning less-than-normal wages in worse-than-average working conditions.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 65</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Some firms do utilize alternative working arrangements to get around US labor law—witness the small but significant boom in gig-economy jobs, like Uber and Lyft, which offer work through online platforms as a way of disguising their employees as independent contractors. But when all is said and done, just 10 percent of US workers were employed in such arrangements in 2017, including as independent contractors, on-call workers, temp agency workers, and fixed-contract workers.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 67</div></div><p>That is up to 34%, just four years later.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;[…] postwar labor market institutions were mostly designed not by left-wing governments but by right-wing politicians who emphasized the importance of national-imperial identities, the formation of male-breadwinner households, and the maintenance of relatively fixed workplace hierarchies.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 67</div></div><p>Kinda like the U.S., no?</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Worldwide, barely one-fifth of unemployed workers received unemployment benefits in 2012. Therefore, workers had to find new sources of income as quickly as possible when they lost their jobs, with the result that the global unemployment rate was just 4.9 percent in 2019, despite a widely recognized dearth of job opportunities. Most workers who’ve lost their jobs have had to work informally. In fact, according to the International Labour Organization, only 26 percent of the global workforce had permanent employment of any kind in 2015, whether full or part time, leaving 74 percent to work either for employers on temporary contracts or else informally, without a contract but for an employer, or on their own account.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 72</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Facing job insecurity, these workers are forced to accept relatively stagnant wages and poor working conditions. This condition is not primarily the result of recent developments in computer technologies. Instead, it follows from decades of overcapacity and under-investment, which ran down the economic growth engine of the world economy (and did so at a time when global labor forces were still expanding). Unless there is a drastic shift in state policy, the COVID-19 recession will only intensify these trends in the years to come.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 73</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Life in stagnant economies has come to be defined by intense employment insecurity—all the worse in recession years, like 2020—which has been artfully represented in recent science fiction dystopias, populated by a redundant humanity. Most people are scraping by, earning additional minutes of life one at a time, while the richest asset-owners have amassed such large quantities of capital that they are endowed with the monetary equivalent of immortality.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 73</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;[…] only about 17 percent of the global labor force works in manufacturing, with an additional 5 percent in mining, transportation, and utilities. The vast majority of the world’s underemployed workers therefore end up employed in the heterogeneous service sector, which accounts for between 70 and 80 percent of total employment in high-income countries, and the majority of workers in Iran, Nigeria, Turkey, the Philippines, Mexico, Brazil, and South Africa.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 74</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;[…] instead of an economy of researchers, tennis instructors, and Michelin-rated chefs, ours is predominantly one of side-street barbers, domestic servants, fruit-cart vendors, and Walmart shelf stackers.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 74</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;These trends suggest that the apocalyptic crisis of labor market dysfunction anticipated by automation theorists will not take place. Instead, unemployment will continue to spike during downturns—as we are seeing happen once again, and on a truly massive scale, in the present COVID-19 recession. Then, in the course of the tepid boom periods that follow, this unemployment will slowly but surely resolve itself into higher levels of underemployment and rising inequality.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 81</div></div><p>Give that man a cigar.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;As Mike Davis put it, the “late-capitalist triage of humanity” has “already taken place.” Unless halted by concerted political action, the coming decades are likely to see more of the same: overcapacity in international markets for agricultural and industrial products will continue to push workers out of those sectors and into services, which will see their share of global employment climb from 50 percent today to 70 or 80 percent by mid century. Since overall rates of economic growth are set to remain low, the service sector will absorb job losers and new labor market entrants only by increasing income inequality, leading us further and further into the postindustrial doldrums.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 81</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;To struggle against the labor market forces that are making people so miserable would require a substantial shift in labor’s capacity to press its interests. Yet over time, the organized sector of the labor force has receded. Union density across the OECD declined from 30 percent of the workforce in 1985 to 16 percent in 2016; the share of workers covered by collective bargaining fell from 45 percent to 32 percent over the same period.53 Global union density fell even lower, weighing in at approximately 7 percent in 2014.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 82</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;In sluggish economies periodically wracked by austerity, it is easier to blame the resulting social deterioration on vulnerable sections of the workforce—immigrants, women, racial and religious minorities—than to unite around a new, emancipatory social project.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 82</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Growing numbers have found themselves excluded from meaningful participation in the economy and from the sense of agency and purpose that it affords, as limited as that may be under the adverse conditions of capitalist societies.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 83</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Between 1946 and 1974, the UK reduced its public debt-to-GDP ratio from 270 percent to just 52 percent, all while investing in education, healthcare, housing, transportation, and communication infrastructures. Across the G20 countries, government debt-to-GDP ratios fell from 107 percent to 23 percent over the same period. This evidence hardly supports the view that full employment, when and where it was achieved in the postwar era, was the result of Keynesian demand stimulus.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 84</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Companies turned to debt financing not to invest in new fixed capital, but rather to engage in mergers and acquisitions, or to buy back their own stocks.8 In the absence of any viable alternative to the industrial growth engine, the stimulation of demand has induced less and less new private investment. That bodes poorly for COVID-19 stimulus packages: like their predecessors, they too will fail to encourage a new wave of capital accumulation. In the absence of a revival of economic growth, states are likely to reimpose austerity once the pandemic ends.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 87</div></div><p>Correct.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Under conditions of economic maturity, Keynes said, it would make more sense to intervene to shrink the labor supply rather than to stimulate labor demand, increasing leisure rather than output. Given a long-term decline in returns to private investment, Keynes suggested, the work-week might have to be reduced to fifteen hours—and even that was only to satisfy the “old Adam” in us—that is, the need to feel useful.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 87</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Like the radical Keynesians, the automation theorists want to wind down the economy. However, they propose a different way to get there: not by raising levels of public investment and legislating a progressive reduction in the work-week, but rather by distributing no-strings-attached incomes to every citizen, without exception.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 90</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;For Paine, coming-of-age grants could serve as the cash equivalent of each person’s share in the common stock of the earth—and thus enable everyone to participate in the world of private property. In his proposal, which anticipates the concept of basic income, payments are not a way to create a post-scarcity world, but rather to secure the moral foundations of a private-ownership society.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 91</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Murray’s proposal for UBI is a disturbing vision of how an ever more unequal society, marked by a persistently low demand for labor, might render this situation palatable to the poorer among its members, while at the same time freeing well-heeled market participants to enrich themselves without limit. A clear danger is that, in its implementation, UBI will come to look more like this right-wing version than it does left-wing alternatives. And indeed, Murray’s version of UBI is the one most discussed in Silicon Valley; correspondingly, it is also the one that inspires most of the automation theorists discussed in this book.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 93</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Combined with a global carbon tax, UBI could play a role in mitigating climate change, freeing us to cleave toward a carbon-neutral economy without worrying about the balance of jobs gained and lost in the course of a harrowing energy transition.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 95</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;But if, as I have argued, contemporary underdemand for labor is the result of global overcapacity and depressed investment—driving down rates of economic growth—then such a distributional struggle would quickly become a zero-sum conflict between labor and capital, blocking, or at least dramatically slowing, progress toward a freer future. As such, we would need a plan for wresting control of the economy away from asset owners. Yet UBI proposals say little about how to reduce capital’s sway over production.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 96</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;While UBI has the laudable goal of separating the income people earn from the amount of work they do, it would do nothing to alter the relation between income and assets, keeping us tethered to a system in which a sizable fraction of total income derives from interest (from extending credit), rent (from leasing land or homes), and profit (from running businesses). In other words, UBI would empower workers without disempowering capital, providing people more autonomy in the fulfillment of their “animal functions” but no greater role in shaping the wider social conditions under which they do so.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 97</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Only a conquest of production, which finally succeeds in wresting the power to control investment decisions away from capitalists, hence rendering the capital strike inoperative, can clear the way for us to advance toward a post-scarcity future.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 98</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Instead of presupposing a fully automated economy and imagining the possibilities for a better and freer world created out of it, we could begin from a world of generalized human dignity, and then consider the technical changes needed to realize that world.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 100</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;In a fully capacitated world, everyone’s passions would be equally worthy of pursuit. Particular individuals would not be assigned to collect garbage, wash dishes, mind children, till the soil, or assemble electronics for their entire lives, just so others could be free to do as they please.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 101</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;More had the inhabitants of his imagined island, Utopia, abolish money and private property. “Wherever there is private property” and “everything is measured in terms of money,” he explained, “it is hardly possible for the common good to be served with justice and prosperity, unless you think justice is served when all the best things go to the worst people or that happiness is possible when everything is shared among very few, who themselves are not entirely happy, while the rest are plunged in misery.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 102</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Theorists of post-scarcity generally estimate that these common labors would take anywhere from three to five hours a day—about one-third to one-half of a standard workweek—although this work could be concentrated in certain portions of each week or in specific years of life. Besides labor hours, other measures could also be used for social accounting. We would divide up responsibilities while taking into account individual aptitudes and proclivities. Some tasks would need to be performed locally, but many could be planned on a regional or global scale, using advanced computer technologies.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 104</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Utopian writer Edward Bellamy proposed one way to organize the division of labor in a post-scarcity society in his novel Looking Backward (1888). There, the supply and demand for labor determine how many hours people work, rather than how high a salary they earn. Skilled work is rewarded with a lesser labor contribution rather than higher pay, while the performance of risky or especially difficult labors earn an honorific—a kind of celebrity. As across societies today, which differ in their institutional preferences for general education or vocational training, there need not be a single solution to this problem, as long as the division of labor neither leaves important tasks undone, nor reproduces an elite class of technicians.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 105</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;In any case, such questions would be settled by human beings’ collective determination of what they want to do, rather than decided for us by supposedly unstoppable technological forces.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 106</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;In such a world, there could still be sanctions to ensure that necessary work is actually undertaken. However, inducements to work would not take the form of threats of starvation, but invitations to cooperate. Economists have long recognized that hunger and homelessness are not the best motivators. Even in Kropotkin’s time, economists admitted that “the best situation for man is when he produces in freedom, has choice in his occupations, has no overseer to impede him, and when he sees his work bring a profit to himself and others like him.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 107</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Efficiency would no longer be an overriding goal of production, but producers would still have to be able to make reasonable choices among production techniques, based on the ease with which they can access different sorts of supplies. It would have to be possible, as well, to hold producers accountable were they to fail to meet democratically determined social standards. Again, there is likely to be no single best way to deal with these crucial problems.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 108</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;After a period of rest and recovery, even the most work-weary people become restless and look for something to do. The reorganization of social life to reduce the role of necessary labor is not, therefore, about overcoming work as such; it is about freeing people to pursue activities that cannot be described simply as either work or leisure. That might include painting murals, learning languages, building waterslides—or discovering new ways to do common tasks to make them less time-consuming. It could mean writing novels, or self-reinvention through education or exploration.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 109</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Under these conditions, &ldquo;creative minds and scientific aptitudes&rdquo; would no longer be &ldquo;wasted due to accidents of birthplace, the bad luck of challenging circumstances, or the necessity to survive.&rdquo; Funding for research or art would also no longer be determined by the profit motive, or dictated by the interests of the wealthy.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 109</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;[…] the rush to implement changes in process would no longer be enforced by market competition, but instead would need to be decided through coordination among various committees—some of which might be more concerned with simply getting their work done than with doing it better. There would be no built-in growth trajectory, no need to grow for growth&rsquo;s sake, especially given that most labors of necessity would be services whose productivity is difficult to raise without sacrificing quality.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 110</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Recognition of the fundamental dignity of the 7 billion plus who make up humanity requires that we no longer agree to relegate some to a life of drudgery so that others may be free. It means we must share out the work that remains to be done in a technologically advanced society, so that everyone has the right and the power to decide what to do with their time.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 111</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Unless social struggles organize themselves around this historic task, the conquest of production, they will not break through to a new synthesis of what it means to be a human being—to live in a world devoid of poverty and billionaires, of stateless refugees and detention camps, and of lives spent in drudgery, which hardly offer a moment to rest, let alone dream.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 117</div></div>      </div>
      </div>
        <div class="footer">
    <div class="footer-data"><div class="footer-links"><ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/contact.php" title="">Contact</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/support.php" title="">Support</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/privacy.php" title="">Privacy</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/rights.php" title="">Rights</a></li></ul></div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="copyright">Copyright (c) 1999-2026 earthli.com. All Rights Reserved.</div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="versions">Powered by <ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore/app_news.php">earthli News 3.7</a></li><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore" title="">earthli WebCore&trade; 3.7</a></li></ul></div></div>    </div>
      </div>
  </div>  </body>
</html>
]]>
  </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
      <title type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[Persepolis Rising by James S. A. Corey (2017) (read in 2022)]]>
  </title>
    <id>https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=4329</id>
    <link href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=4329"/>
    <updated>2022-01-30T23:37:53+01:00</updated>
    <author>
        <name type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[Marco von Ballmoos]]>
  </name>
      <uri>https://earthli.com/users/marco</uri>
    </author>
      <summary type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<p><small class="notes">Standard disclaimer [1]</small></p>
<p>This is the seventh novel in <cite>The Expanse</cite> series. It picks up the story nearly three decades after the end of the last book. The Transport Union manages traffic between the Ring Colonies, led by Camina Drummer. She is comfortable in her role, but laments the hidebound nature of... [<a class="complete-text-link" href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=4329">More</a>]</p>
]]>
  </summary>
      <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<html lang="en">
  <head>
    <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/themes/ice.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/fonts/raleway.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/core/medium.css">
  </head>
  <body>
<div class="style-controls">  <div class="page">
    <div class="page-body">
<div class="info-box-top">
<p>
Published by <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_user.php?name=marco" title="Marco von Ballmoos" class="visible">marco</a> on <span class="date-time">30. Jan 2022 23:37:53 (GMT-5)</span>
</p>
</div>
      <div class="text-flow wide">
  <p><small class="notes">Standard disclaimer [1]</small></p>
<p>This is the seventh novel in <cite>The Expanse</cite> series. It picks up the story nearly three decades after the end of the last book. The Transport Union manages traffic between the Ring Colonies, led by Camina Drummer. She is comfortable in her role, but laments the hidebound nature of bureaucracy.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Time was supposed to heal all wounds. To Drummer, that was just a nice way of saying that if she waited long enough, none of the things that seemed important to her would turn out to matter. Or at least not the way she’d thought they did.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 17</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The question wasn’t whether moving psychoactive alien seedpods between worlds was a good idea so much as whether someone was going to lose face in front of a committee meeting. Thus were the great decisions of history made.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 109</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;If they kill us all, Drummer thought, this will be why. Not their technology, not their strategy, not the invisible cycle of history. It’ll be our inability to do anything without five committee meetings to talk about it.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 244</div></div><p>Avasarala shows up to offer backup, advice, and, of course, orders, even though she no longer has any official capacity.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;“Don’t let things sit for too long. It’s always tempting to just ignore the things that aren’t actually on fire just at the moment, but then you’re also committing to spend your time putting out fires.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 110</div></div><p>The <cite>Rocinante</cite> works for the Transport Union and is forced to do a prisoner transport. Holden does it, but he isn&rsquo;t happy about it. This triggers a decision by Naomi and Holden to announce their retirement and hand off the <em>Roci</em> to Bobbie and the crew.</p>
<p>Naomi and Holden are on Medina Station for only a week before two Laconian ships enter the Ring System through their gate. No-one&rsquo;s heard from them in almost thirty years. They&rsquo;ve been busy building enormous battleships with protomolecule technology, generations ahead of what the rest of humanity is still using.</p>
<p>They announce that they&rsquo;re there to take over the empire and for everyone to give up peacefully. Any violence will have been forced upon the Laconians, who are only interested in running the human empire better. That is, you have to do what they say all the time, but the Laconians are obviously so much better than everyone else that no-one who isn&rsquo;t a complete idiot could possibly mind.</p>
<p>The battle of Medina Station is over quickly, with the <cite>Gathering Storm</cite> firing a magnetic cannon that destroys the rail guns on the old station and also rings it like a bell, emitting a tremendous amount of energy. That means that they can use it anytime to control the gates—all with one ship. The other, even larger, ship <cite>Heart of the Tempest</cite>, captained by Admiral Trejo, heads into the Sol System ahead of schedule. Its mission is get Earth&rsquo;s capitulation.</p>
<p>They occupy Media Station and install Governor Singh to oversee the occupation. Although he was nominated by Commandante Duarte as one of the best and the brightest that the Laconian academies had to offer, he is both spectacularly bereft of practical experience and also remarkably thin-skinned. However, it&rsquo;s not yet clear how the rest of humanity is going to react. Predictably, it reacts all of the ways at once.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;There were thousands of feeds streaming right now, all around the system, with every variation of the ways to make sense of the history they were living through. In most, Laconia was an invading force to be resisted, but there were people who said Laconia was a liberating influence, an end to the oppression of the EMC and the Transport Union. Or that they were the true spirit of Mars, betrayed by the old congressional republic and now returned in triumph. Or that they were unbeatable, and capitulation was the only choice.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 243</div></div><p>The crew of the <cite>Roci</cite> reunites with Naomi and Holden, going into hiding with Drummer&rsquo;s husband Saba&rsquo;s crew. They are the underground, revolting against Laconian rule.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;“This here?” Amos said. He pointed at the Marine outside, the security drones that now hovered over every part of Medina’s drum, the people in Laconian Navy uniforms everywhere. “I’ve seen this before. This is us getting paved over. All we can do now is try to find some cracks to grow through.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 164</div></div><p>Clarissa chimes in on the nature of powerful, rich men (having grown up around her father, Jules-Pierre Mao),</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;[…] some men just need to own everything. Anything they lay their eyes on that they don’t possess, it’s like a sliver in their finger.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 166</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;“My father could be the kindest, most generous and loving man. Right up until he wanted something and you wouldn’t give it to him. I don’t know why I think this, but Duarte feels the same. And these are men who will mercilessly punish anyone who won’t comply, but with tears in their eyes and begging you to tell them why you made them do it.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 166</div></div><p>Naomi adds her view, as a Belter:</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;“You’re new here,” she said. “I’m a Belter. Security coming down on you just because they can? Checkpoints and identity tracking? Knowing that you could wind up in the recycler for any reason or no reason? I grew up like this. Amos did too, in his way. I never wanted to come back here, but I know how this all goes. Childhood memories, sa sa que?”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 183</div></div><p>Whereas Amos rounds things out with a very Amos-like summary:</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;“All right, then,” Bobbie said. “The way I see it, the next step is find someone who can get messages back to the union. Or Earth-Mars. See if there’s anyone out there with a plan, or if we’re going to have to make one up on our own.”</p>
<p>&ldquo;“We can do that,” Amos said. “Shouldn’t be hard.”</p>
<p>&ldquo;“You sure?” Alex said. “This is Medina Station under occupation by a bunch of splinter Martian military expats. It’s not Baltimore.”</p>
<p>&ldquo;Amos’ smile was as placid as always. “Everywhere’s Baltimore.”&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 194</div></div><p>Their first real act of sabotage is to set a bomb, built with the help of the age-old Belter gang <cite>Voltaire Collective</cite>. The bomb is not meant to achieve any goal, but to distract the Laconians while Bobbie and Clarissa hook into the Laconians encrypted data feed.</p>
<p>The next underground attack is to get the encryption codes. For this, they set another bomb to make it look like they were attacking the <cite>Gathering Storm</cite>, but they were really attacking the data-encryption station. During this attack, though, Holden is taken prisoner. They have the information, though, and they discover that another gigantic ship is on its way, the <cite>Eye of the Typhoon</cite>.</p>
<p>Singh is not handling this well at all. He is excited to have captured Holden because now he can convince the leader of the rebellion of how amazing, benevolent, and <em>inevitable</em> the Laconian Empire is.</p>
<p>He&rsquo;s a slow learner, though. Speaking to the president of the colonies, he says,</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;“It’s come to my attention that many of the social organizations of the old human power structures show a shocking inability to do risk analysis. They may foolishly attempt a doomed assault, thinking all they’re risking is their own lives. Reason doesn’t work with this kind of person. I need you to make them understand, on an emotional level, the price for such an attack. I will kill every single person on their planet. I assume even former OPA radicals have family members they care about, and whose lives they are less willing to risk on a romantic notion of a hero’s death.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 257</div></div><p>He&rsquo;s still not getting it. He&rsquo;s also not getting that there is no benevolence anymore. That any such benevolence was only in exchange for absolute and immediate fealty. People can&rsquo;t tell the difference between good intentions forced into authoritarianism and outright, venal authoritarianism. Because there is none, for them.</p>
<p>Singh reminds me of Soltan Gris, from L. Ron Hubbard&rsquo;s Mission Earth series. His conversations with Holden are very reminiscent of those between Gris and Jettero Heller. [2]</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Holden sipped his coffee. “That’s the thing. The people you’re controlling don’t have a voice in how you control them. As long as everyone’s on the same page, things may be great, but when there’s a question, you win. Right?”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 384</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;“Not that academic,” Holden said. “I’ve spent a lot of years trying to get people to get along without anyone’s boot being on anyone’s neck. Your plan A is what I’ve spent a lifetime pushing against.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 384</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;“The high consul is a very wise, very thoughtful man,” he said. “I have perfect faith that—”</p>
<p>&ldquo;“No. Stop. ‘Perfect faith’ really tells me everything I need to know,” Holden said. “You think this is a gentle, bloodless conquest, don’t you?”</p>
<p>&ldquo;“It is, to the degree that you allow it to be.”</p>
<p>&ldquo;“I was there for the war Duarte started to cover his tracks. I was there for the starving years afterward. Your empire’s hands look a lot cleaner when you get to dictate where history begins and what parts of it don’t count.”&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 385</div></div><p>Meanwhile, all of Sol System&rsquo;s massed forces have proven to be no match for a single Laconian ship. It shrugs off all attacks, destroys everything in its path, and forces a surrender. Drummer tenders the surrender, with Avasarala looking on. Drummer thinks the following, but does not act on it. Instead, she chooses to save millions of lives. The sentiment will, however, come back to haunt Laconia, one can be relatively certain.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;[…] we have been conquered, but we will fight to the last breath because living with someone else’s hand on our necks is intolerable, has always been intolerable, will always be intolerable. Not because of Laconia, not because of the union, not because of any of the authorities through all of history that have made rules and then dared people to break them. Because we’re human, and humans are mean, independent monkeys that reached their greatness by killing every other species of hominid that looked at us funny. We will not be controlled for long. Not even by ourselves. Any other plan is a pipe dream.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 519</div></div><p>Their weapons were just too powerful. The Union&rsquo;s top scientist describes the situation,</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;“Ma’am, that ship stripped Pallas Station down to something less than atoms. It shut down consciousness throughout the system in a way that I don’t have the structural language to explain, and it seems pretty fucking unimpressed by the idea of locality. It’s affecting the nature of vacuum through the whole solar system. If you didn’t know we were punching above our weight here, I’m not sure what I could have said to clarify that.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 451</div></div><p>Singh reveals to Holden that the <cite>Tempest</cite> had an unexplained phenomenon on board: one of the bizarre &ldquo;bullets&rdquo; appeared out of nowhere. Holden had found one of these on Ilus and learned that it is an artifact of the civilization that destroyed the protomolecule civilization. It appeared out of nowhere when the <cite>Tempest</cite> fired its magnetic weapon in Sol System. They have been detected.</p>
<p>Singh, in his typical miscomprehension, figures it would be best to send Holden back to Duarte on Laconia. Naomi is heartbroken when she discovers this, but she continues with their plan to help the underground escape from Medina. The plan is complex: Saba frees prisoners, they use a secret lockdown code to freeze all of the powered Laconian armor, Clarissa and Naomi disable the sensor array, Alex steals the <cite>Rocinante</cite> and takes off, and Bobbie and Amos board the <cite>Gathering Storm</cite>.</p>
<p>A Belter named Jordao betrays Clarissa and Naomi. They manage to shunt off the sensor array, but Jordao is about to tell the Laconians where it is. Instead, Clarissa—who&rsquo;s been ill from her implants for a long time—uses them one last time to destroy all opposition and save the mission.</p>
<p>The <cite>Storm</cite> has only a skeleton crew, which makes it easier for Bobbie and Amos to take it over. It&rsquo;s not easy—they can barely cut through the hull because of the advanced, self-healing materials—but they manage it. Instead of scuttling it, they&rsquo;ve managed to <em>steal it</em>. With the <cite>Storm</cite> out of the way, the other twenty ships leave Medina Station and, inside of 90 minutes, all of them are through one gate or another.</p>
<p>Singh loses all control, ordering his head of security Overstreet to eliminate most of the other people on the station as reprisal. Instead, Overstreet says that he has higher orders: uphold the Laconian code. He executes Singh. They retain control over Medina station, but the underground has escaped to fight another day.</p>
<p>Holden is in a prison on Laconia, a special guest of Duarte. Amos and Bobbie are in orbit above Freehold, where Alex and Naomi have landed the <cite>Roci</cite>. Naomi considers her situation,</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;She’d seen a map once—the splash of systems that the gates connected. Thirteen hundred stars in a galaxy with three hundred billion of them. They’d been clumped together, the gate-network stars. The two farthest systems were hardly more than a thousand light-years apart. A little more than one percent of the galaxy, and still unthinkably vast.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 526</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Everything changed, and it went right on changing. A terrible thought when things were good, a comforting one now. Whatever happened, she could be certain that things wouldn’t stay the way they were now. And if she stayed smart and clever and lucky, she’d be able to affect how the next change came. Or take advantage of it.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 528</div></div><p><hr></p>
<div class="footnote-reference"><span id="footnote_DRAFTABLE_ENTRY_4329_1_body" class="footnote-number">[1]</span> Disclaimer: these are notes I took while reading this book. They include citations I found interesting or enlightening or particularly well-written. In some cases, I&rsquo;ve pointed out which of these applies to which citation; in others, I have not. Any benefit you gain from reading these notes is purely incidental to the purpose they serve of reminding me of what I once read. Please see Wikipedia for a summary if I&rsquo;ve failed to provide one sufficient for your purposes. If my notes serve to trigger an interest in this book, then I&rsquo;m happy for you.</div><div class="footnote-reference"><span id="footnote_DRAFTABLE_ENTRY_4329_2_body" class="footnote-number">[2]</span>  It&rsquo;s been about 35 years since I read them, so there may be a good amount of confabulation here.</div><h2>Citations</h2><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Time was supposed to heal all wounds. To Drummer, that was just a nice way of saying that if she waited long enough, none of the things that seemed important to her would turn out to matter. Or at least not the way she’d thought they did.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 17</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;There are always people who are wary of change. And that’s a good thing. Change should be watched, moderated, and questioned. But that conservative view shouldn’t rein in progress or put a damper on hope.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 22</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Every great nation, they said, was founded on a knife and a lie.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 58</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;“They didn’t vote for Drummer,” he said, tapping hard on the screen. “They can’t appeal her decisions, and she has the power of life and death over them. She needs to be held to a higher standard than ‘whatever’s most convenient.’ And in every military service in history, when the commander gave an immoral command, it was the duty of the soldiers to disobey it.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 67</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Any of it could be the key to unimagined miracles. Or catastrophe. Or placebo-euphoric snake-oil light-show bullshit. The images from the seedpods could be the encrypted records of the fallen civilization that had built miracles they were still only beginning to understand. Or they could be the spores of whatever had killed them. Or they could be lava lamps. Who fucking knew?&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 109</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The question wasn’t whether moving psychoactive alien seedpods between worlds was a good idea so much as whether someone was going to lose face in front of a committee meeting. Thus were the great decisions of history made.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 109</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;“Don’t let things sit for too long. It’s always tempting to just ignore the things that aren’t actually on fire just at the moment, but then you’re also committing to spend your time putting out fires.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 110</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Only it was her battle now, and while she was very clear that she was in the right, it was also evident that her position wasn’t going to help her change Langstiver’s plan. She couldn’t beat sense into a stone. Not even when it seemed fun to try.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 121</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;“I’m telling you he came back because he thinks he can win,” Avasarala said. “And if he thinks that, you should prepare yourself for the idea that it’s true.” </p>
<p>&ldquo;“There’s no point, then,” Drummer said. “We should just roll over? Put our necks under his boot and hope he doesn’t step on us too hard?”</p>
<p>&ldquo;“Of course not. But don’t talk yourself into underestimating him because you want him to be the next Marco Inaros. Duarte won’t hand you a win by being a dumbfuck. He won’t spread himself too thin. He won’t overreach. He won’t make up half a dozen plans and then spin a bottle to pick one. He’s a chess player. And if you act on instinct, do the thing your feelings demand, he’ll beat us all.”&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 145</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The absurdities and accidents of human character that affected the flow of goods and information in ways that were as unpredictable as they were exhausting. Like having to throw an entire branch of Medina’s infrastructure staff in the brig.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 151</div></div><p>Yes, the natives can be so exhausting.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;“This here?” Amos said. He pointed at the Marine outside, the security drones that now hovered over every part of Medina’s drum, the people in Laconian Navy uniforms everywhere. “I’ve seen this before. This is us getting paved over. All we can do now is try to find some cracks to grow through.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 164</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;And some men just need to own everything. Anything they lay their eyes on that they don’t possess, it’s like a sliver in their finger.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 166</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;“My father could be the kindest, most generous and loving man. Right up until he wanted something and you wouldn’t give it to him. I don’t know why I think this, but Duarte feels the same. And these are men who will mercilessly punish anyone who won’t comply, but with tears in their eyes and begging you to tell them why you made them do it.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 166</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;“You’re new here,” she said. “I’m a Belter. Security coming down on you just because they can? Checkpoints and identity tracking? Knowing that you could wind up in the recycler for any reason or no reason? I grew up like this. Amos did too, in his way. I never wanted to come back here, but I know how this all goes. Childhood memories, sa sa que?”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 183</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;“All right, then,” Bobbie said. “The way I see it, the next step is find someone who can get messages back to the union. Or Earth-Mars. See if there’s anyone out there with a plan, or if we’re going to have to make one up on our own.”</p>
<p>&ldquo;“We can do that,” Amos said. “Shouldn’t be hard.”</p>
<p>&ldquo;“You sure?” Alex said. “This is Medina Station under occupation by a bunch of splinter Martian military expats. It’s not Baltimore.”</p>
<p>&ldquo;Amos’ smile was as placid as always. “Everywhere’s Baltimore.”&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 194</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;History was a cycle. Everything that had happened before, all the way back through the generations, would happen again. Sometimes the wheel turned quickly, sometimes it was slow. She could see it like a feed gear, all teeth and bearings with her on the rim along with everybody else. Her last thought before forgetfulness took her and she fell deeply into slumber was that even with the gates, nothing really ever changed so much as repeated itself, over and over, with all new people, forever.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 207</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The destroyer—Holden had called it the Gathering Storm—looked like a natural crystal formation that someone had chipped into a knife. The colors were all translucent pinks and blues, faceted like a gem.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 238</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;She wasn’t ready. Rock hoppers full of gravel were burning hard for positions that didn’t matter anymore. The EMC fleet was consolidating around the inner planets and the Jovian system, but with days—sometimes weeks—left on their burns. The void cities were looping down to meet them. All of it preparation for tactical situations that weren’t on the board anymore.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 239</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;We recognize the deep cultural and historical importance of Sol system, and hope that this transition can be made peacefully and with the minimum of disruption. In the event that local forces resist, I am prepared and authorized to take any actions necessary to complete my mission. High Consul Duarte and I extend our best wishes to the local residents, and ask that you contact your governments to urge them to act in the name of peace. Violence is always a loss, and the measure of that loss is entirely in your control. The false gentility of the threat made her wish he’d just said he’d burn their cities and take their children. It would have felt more honest.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 242</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;There were thousands of feeds streaming right now, all around the system, with every variation of the ways to make sense of the history they were living through. In most, Laconia was an invading force to be resisted, but there were people who said Laconia was a liberating influence, an end to the oppression of the EMC and the Transport Union. Or that they were the true spirit of Mars, betrayed by the old congressional republic and now returned in triumph. Or that they were unbeatable, and capitulation was the only choice.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 243</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;If they kill us all, Drummer thought, this will be why. Not their technology, not their strategy, not the invisible cycle of history. It’ll be our inability to do anything without five committee meetings to talk about it.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 244</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;“Our mandate from High Consul Duarte is to win over the population of this station, as a first step in winning over the population of the colony worlds. We do that by entangling our interests. By teaching them that what they think of as ‘informing’ is actually just good citizenship. This is just a first step in building what will hopefully be a network of cooperators to help us.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 254</div></div><p>Omg hahahaha.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;He wondered what their first meeting would have been like if he’d come to her office instead of bringing her to his. Seeing all of this, he might have recommended against working with her at all.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 256</div></div><p>Sometimes I think they&rsquo;re overdoing the overconfidence and stupidity, but then I remember the template. It&rsquo;s realistic.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;“It’s come to my attention that many of the social organizations of the old human power structures show a shocking inability to do risk analysis. They may foolishly attempt a doomed assault, thinking all they’re risking is their own lives. Reason doesn’t work with this kind of person. I need you to make them understand, on an emotional level, the price for such an attack. I will kill every single person on their planet. I assume even former OPA radicals have family members they care about, and whose lives they are less willing to risk on a romantic notion of a hero’s death.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 257</div></div><p>Still not getting it. Also not getting that there is no benevolence anymore. That was only in exchange for absolute and immediate fealty. People can&rsquo;t  tell the difference between good intentions forced into authoritarianism and outright, venal authoritarianism. Because there is none, for them.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;“From the Bible. Revelation. When the devil fell from grace, he took a third of the angels with him. It’s described as the great dragon pulling a third of the stars of heaven down with its tail.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 268</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;Holden was smiling like a salesman, as if his radiant goodwill could warm up every other interaction in the room. It left him looking more than a little ridiculous, but damned if Katria didn’t consider him for a long moment and chuckle. “If I refuse, then we all took a long walk for nothing,” she said.</p>
<p>&ldquo;Holden beamed. Bobbie wasn’t sure how he did it. The way he could disarm a situation with his almost palpable guilelessness astonished her every time. “Thank you,” Holden said. “I really appreciate this.”&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 296</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;“And what,” Singh said after he’d let her squirm enough, “would be a better use of your time, Madam President?”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 310</div></div><p>Now I remember who Singh reminds me of: Soltan Gris, L. Ron Hubbard&rsquo;s Mission Earth series.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;“You don’t trust your people’s discipline?” Bobbie asked.</p>
<p>&ldquo;Saba pointed at the closed door. “My people are the crew on the Malaclypse. These others weren’t mine until they stopped being Drummer’s. And she’s had five or six layers of bureaucrats between. It’s not I don’t trust, it’s that I don’t trust blind. People are people. Fucked up like we all are, it amazes me when we can even make a sandwich.”&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 379</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Holden sipped his coffee. “That’s the thing. The people you’re controlling don’t have a voice in how you control them. As long as everyone’s on the same page, things may be great, but when there’s a question, you win. Right?”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 384</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;“Not that academic,” Holden said. “I’ve spent a lot of years trying to get people to get along without anyone’s boot being on anyone’s neck. Your plan A is what I’ve spent a lifetime pushing against.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 384</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;“The high consul is a very wise, very thoughtful man,” he said. “I have perfect faith that—”</p>
<p>&ldquo;“No. Stop. ‘Perfect faith’ really tells me everything I need to know,” Holden said. “You think this is a gentle, bloodless conquest, don’t you?”</p>
<p>&ldquo;“It is, to the degree that you allow it to be.”</p>
<p>&ldquo;“I was there for the war Duarte started to cover his tracks. I was there for the starving years afterward. Your empire’s hands look a lot cleaner when you get to dictate where history begins and what parts of it don’t count.”&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 385</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;“Look,” Holden said. “You and me? We’re not friends. We aren’t going to be friends. I will oppose you and your empire to my dying breath. But right now, none of that matters. Whatever built the gates and the protomolecule and all these ruins we’re living in? They were wiped out. And the thing that wiped them out just took a shot at you.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 388</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Saba’s eyes softened. “My lady wife is back in Sol leading the fight against these bastards. And I will move worlds to wake up beside her again. Just once more.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 401</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;[…] woman with a heart-shaped face peered past the guard’s shoulder, straining to catch a glimpse of him, and Singh waved at her. Let the civilians see that their governor was here, not hiding away in his office. If he wasn’t scared of the terrorists, the loyal faction of the population wouldn’t be either. Or less so, anyway.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 415</div></div><p>That&rsquo;s lovely, again. Singh is absolutely demented.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;[…] the old woman sighed, “[…] It’d be a better world if there was always at least one right answer instead of a basket of fucked.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 423</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;“We have expended two-thirds of our rail-gun ammunition,” the weapons tech announced. “Shall I maintain fire?”</p>
<p>&ldquo;“Yes,” Drummer said. “Then start putting chairs in the launcher. We hit that thing until we’re down to pillows and beer.”</p>
<p>&ldquo;“Understood, ma’am,” the weapons tech said. She could hear the smile in his voice. She felt it too—the giddy sense that even if they were winning ugly, they were at least winning.&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 427</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;“Ma’am, that ship stripped Pallas Station down to something less than atoms. It shut down consciousness throughout the system in a way that I don’t have the structural language to explain, and it seems pretty fucking unimpressed by the idea of locality. It’s affecting the nature of vacuum through the whole solar system. If you didn’t know we were punching above our weight here, I’m not sure what I could have said to clarify that.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 451</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;“It wouldn’t be the first time something like that had happened. The one thing you know about someone who’s willing to compromise his allies is that he’s willing to compromise his allies.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 461</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;“You got a plan?” Amos asked.</p>
<p>&ldquo;“That’d be generous,” she said, “but I’ve got something I’m going to do.”&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 491</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;It’s like I missed a day at school, and everyone else learned to speak Mandarin while I was gone. I don’t understand any of this.”</p>
<p>&ldquo;“Yeah,” Drummer said. “I can see that.”</p>
<p>&ldquo;“It’s the reward of old age,” Avasarala said. “You live long enough, and you can watch everything you worked for become irrelevant.”</p>
<p>&ldquo;“You’re not selling it,” Drummer said.</p>
<p>&ldquo;“Fuck you, then. Die young. See if I care.” Drummer laughed. Avasarala grinned, and for a moment, they understood each other perfectly. For a moment, Drummer didn’t feel alone.&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 517</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;[…] we have been conquered, but we will fight to the last breath because living with someone else’s hand on our necks is intolerable, has always been intolerable, will always be intolerable. Not because of Laconia, not because of the union, not because of any of the authorities through all of history that have made rules and then dared people to break them. Because we’re human, and humans are mean, independent monkeys that reached their greatness by killing every other species of hominid that looked at us funny. We will not be controlled for long. Not even by ourselves. Any other plan is a pipe dream.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 519</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Naomi looked up at the little slice of stars. The galactic disk looked the same as it had in Sol system, but the constellations not quite like her own. Parallax, she knew, was how they’d started mapping which systems were on the other sides of the gates. She’d seen a map once—the splash of systems that the gates connected. Thirteen hundred stars in a galaxy with three hundred billion of them. They’d been clumped together, the gate-network stars. The two farthest systems were hardly more than a thousand light-years apart. A little more than one percent of the galaxy, and still unthinkably vast.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 526</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;[…] the sense of being in midnight under stars in the middle of an ocean of air that wouldn’t run out or leak away. It really was reassuring in a way that even the best station atmosphere could never quite equal.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 527</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Everything changed, and it went right on changing. A terrible thought when things were good, a comforting one now. Whatever happened, she could be certain that things wouldn’t stay the way they were now. And if she stayed smart and clever and lucky, she’d be able to affect how the next change came. Or take advantage of it.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 528</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Duarte had known people like him from his time in the service. Hotheads and gadflies. The ones who were always sure they knew better than anyone else. The truth was, they had their place. Like anyone else, they could be apt tools if they were well suited to the task at hand.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 533</div></div><p>Hey, neat! Now we know where Singh learned how to underestimate people.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;“Interesting problem? Something fired a shot at you. At your ship. It turned off people’s minds all throughout the system, and that’s an interesting problem? That was an attack.”</p>
<p>&ldquo;“And it didn’t work,” Duarte said. “We aren’t the same thing that got wiped out before. What killed them affected us, but it didn’t destroy us.”&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 535</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;“There was no path where we left the gates alone. No future where we didn’t use the technologies and lessons we learned from them. And there wasn’t likely to be one where we didn’t face the same kind of pushback that killed the ones who came before us. There was only the way forward where we were scattershot and chaotic, or the one where we were organized, regimented, and disciplined.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 536</div></div><p>Which way is better? Chaotic? Or organic? And what&rsquo;s the hurry? Humanity needs to grow up first. Thirty years is nothing.</p>
      </div>
      </div>
        <div class="footer">
    <div class="footer-data"><div class="footer-links"><ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/contact.php" title="">Contact</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/support.php" title="">Support</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/privacy.php" title="">Privacy</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/rights.php" title="">Rights</a></li></ul></div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="copyright">Copyright (c) 1999-2026 earthli.com. All Rights Reserved.</div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="versions">Powered by <ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore/app_news.php">earthli News 3.7</a></li><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore" title="">earthli WebCore&trade; 3.7</a></li></ul></div></div>    </div>
      </div>
  </div>  </body>
</html>
]]>
  </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
      <title type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[What Every Programmer Should Know About Memory by Ulrich Drepper (2007) (read in 2021)]]>
  </title>
    <id>https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=4301</id>
    <link href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=4301"/>
    <updated>2022-01-29T23:22:54+01:00</updated>
    <author>
        <name type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[Marco von Ballmoos]]>
  </name>
      <uri>https://earthli.com/users/marco</uri>
    </author>
      <summary type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<p><small class="notes">Standard disclaimer [1]</small></p>
<p>This is a <a href="https://www.gwern.net/docs/cs/2007-drepper.pdf">114-page document</a> about various features of processor architectures and of programming languages and techniques that affect performance. It starts with a discussion of how memory (RAM or cache) even works, on an electrical level. How much maintenance overhead does a... [<a class="complete-text-link" href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=4301">More</a>]</p>
]]>
  </summary>
      <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<html lang="en">
  <head>
    <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/themes/ice.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/fonts/raleway.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/core/medium.css">
  </head>
  <body>
<div class="style-controls">  <div class="page">
    <div class="page-body">
<div class="info-box-top">
<p>
Published by <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_user.php?name=marco" title="Marco von Ballmoos" class="visible">marco</a> on <span class="date-time">29. Jan 2022 23:22:54 (GMT-5)</span>
</p>
<p>
Updated by <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_user.php?name=marco" title="Marco von Ballmoos" class="visible">marco</a> on <span class="date-time">30. Jan 2022 00:10:20 (GMT-5)</span>
</p>
</div>
      <div class="text-flow wide">
  <p><small class="notes">Standard disclaimer [1]</small></p>
<p>This is a <a href="https://www.gwern.net/docs/cs/2007-drepper.pdf">114-page document</a> about various features of processor architectures and of programming languages and techniques that affect performance. It starts with a discussion of how memory (RAM or cache) even works, on an electrical level. How much maintenance overhead does a capacitor in a memory unit need in order to maintain its value? That is, there are cycles during which the RAM is refreshing its capacitance and cannot be read. If a processor request for that data comes at the wrong time, the reply will stall longer than usual.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;A second problem resulting from the tiny charge is that the information read from the cell is not directly usable. The data line must be connected to a sense amplifier which can distinguish between a stored 0 or 1 over the whole range of charges which still have to count as 1. A third problem is that reading a cell causes the charge of the capacitor to be depleted. This means every read operation must be followed by an operation to recharge the capacitor. This is done automatically by feeding the output of the sense amplifier back into the capacitor.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 162-165</div></div><p>This takes him into discussing processor caches and how and when data is retained or evicted. How can you align structures and data so that they fit into a cache line? How do you order operations so that a cache line can stay in the cache for as long as possible? What sort of eviction policies do processors even use? LRU? Something else? Can you control them? How do you avoid thrashing?</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The state changes are accomplished without too much effort by the processors listening, or snooping, on the other processors’ work. Certain operations a processor performs are announced on external pins and thus make the processor’s cache handling visible to the outside. The address of the cache line in question is visible on the address bus.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 841-843</div></div><p>Next up is concurrency: when multiple processors, each with their own tier of caches, are working with the &ldquo;same&rdquo; memory, then they have to coordinate on cache evictions so that no processor is using stale data. The amount of coordination is incredible and an eviction becomes even more costly as the number of processors increases. Changing data in-memory becomes quite costly and should be avoided, if possible. At the very least, one should be aware of how much it costs to change memory. There might be simple things you can do at a high level of abstraction that makes it easier for the compiler to generate performant code for you.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;When we modify memory things get even uglier. Figure 3.20 shows the results for the sequential Increment test. This graph is using a logarithmic scale for the Y axis. So, do not be fooled by the apparently small differences. We still have about a 18% penalty for running two threads and now an amazing 93% penalty for running four threads. This means the prefetch traffic together with the write-back traffic is pretty much saturating the bus when four threads are used.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 898-901</div></div><p>It&rsquo;s very good to know about the problems, but solving them yourself, as instructed in this document, is almost certainly a bridge too far for most developers. This is why you use task libraries. Let the experts figure out what the optimal number of threads is for your tasks and the available hardware. If you&rsquo;re launching your own thread, you&rsquo;re almost certainly doing it wrong.</p>
<p>This stuff is hard, as evidenced by this book. Instead, follow the old edict: use as high a level of abstraction as possible and leave the lower-level stuff to people who are experts at the lower levels. If your application is doing a high-level task, use a high-level API and trust that the runtime and compiler will help optimize it for you.</p>
<p>Obviously, this has limits. If measurements (see end of the paper, where he demonstrates tools like valgrind) show that there is a performance problem and it&rsquo;s critical, then you&rsquo;ll have to drop one or more levels of abstraction and take care of it yourself. This may also become necessary if the API, language, or runtime doesn&rsquo;t allow you to provide enough information about your application to allow a compiler or runtime to optimize performance.</p>
<p>This is, for example, why .NET and C# continue to introduce concepts like <code>struct record</code> and <code>readonly struct record</code>. These are all additional hints about what sort of changes are even allowed. A struct has copy semantics, which automatically means that the original structure won&rsquo;t be modified when passed across a function boundary. A readonly struct record promises that the fields can&rsquo;t be modified in any case, so the compiler can <em>actually just pass a reference</em> instead of a copy. This avoids cache eviction on function boundaries as well.</p>
<p>Most of the information in this long paper is still accurate today, but a good number of the middle sections that deal with BP (branch prediction) say nothing about potential data leaks. Instead, the paper still discusses the advantages of processors being able to inspect each other&rsquo;s caches, at least to some degree. Spectre and Meltdown showed us that those caches will then sometimes continue to contain the results of branches that were discarded—and can still be read by clever programs. Some of this functionality is no longer available for the aggressive optimizer.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Program flow is much more predictable than data access patterns. Today’s CPUs are very good at detecting patterns. This helps with prefetching. As a result CPU designers spend a lot of time and chip real estate on branch prediction so that pipeline stalls happen as infrequently as possible.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 1006-1008</div></div><p>There is also a section on how one could really optimize for performance by bypassing unneeded OS restrictions or saving memory by allowing an application to modify itself in ways that can be highly beneficial for performance but that a general-purpose operating system would not be able to distinguish from the workings of a malicious program.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;In early computer days memory was a premium. People went to great lengths to reduce the size of the program to make more room for program data. One trick frequently deployed was to change the program itself over time. Such Self Modifying Code (SMC) is occasionally still found, these days mostly for performance reasons or in security exploits. SMC&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 1024-1026</div></div><p>Forth was one such language/environment. One use for something like this would be to discard code like one-time init/startup code or large and intricate singleton initializers (e.g. data generation). There are ways of doing this now by loading dynamic modules and then unloading them when no longer needed. Such solutions aren&rsquo;t used very often as the work is both complex and involved.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;If performance is really much more important than security, randomization can be turned off. The OS will then usually at least load all DSOs contiguously in virtual memory.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 1248-1249</div></div><p>I find it fascinating to consider that, for a really fast program, you&rsquo;d almost have to consider using a different operating system. You can&rsquo;t use any consumer-grade stuff because those have so many layers of code built to protect against hacking in an open network. None of that is necessary if you have much more control over the environment. If you&rsquo;re air-gapped and control the processes, then you don&rsquo;t have to worry about malicious code and can remove many layers of protection.</p>
<p>You can use self-modifying code (because you know it&rsquo;s not a trojan), you can skip virus checks, you can keep things in memory contiguously instead of randomizing loading positions, you can run a much lighter, more-dedicated kernel. Don&rsquo;t run in any more of a VM than you have to. If you&rsquo;re really, really pushing for performance, then it makes more sense to first remove the umpteen layers of protective code that aren&rsquo;t necessary before you start rewriting your application to try to get around them.</p>
<p>That takes the discussion to virtualization, which has become even more of a hot topic than it was in 2007.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Overall, programmers must be aware that, with virtualization used, the cost of cache misses (instruction, data, or TLB) is even higher than without virtualization. Any optimization which reduces this work will pay off even more in virtualized environments. Processor designers will, over time, reduce the difference more and more through technologies like EPT and NPT but it will never completely go away.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 1379-1382</div></div><p>We&rsquo;re very often using several layers of virtualization in our programming environments. The code that we write is farther and farther away from running &ldquo;on the metal&rdquo;.</p>
<p>For example, I&rsquo;m working on an M1 Mac right now, typing into a browser window. The Browser uses JavaScript, which runs in an interpreter that is optimized with several layers to try to determine what kind of changes could happen to the code and to what degree it can be optimized down to simple machine code.</p>
<p>If the browser doesn&rsquo;t run natively on M1, then it will run through a virtualized emulator named Rosetta Stone. If I&rsquo;m running MySQL in a Docker container, there&rsquo;s another layer of virtualization away. All of these layers have to do their level best to present enough information to the next layer down so that it can produce the simplest and most efficient representation possible. This is all getting even more complicated.</p>
<p>For example, cache misses of various types are not even so easy to predict</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;While page faults usually are a one-time cost, TLB misses are a perpetual penalty given that the TLB cache is usually small and it is flushed frequently. Page faults are orders of magnitude more expensive than TLB misses but, if a program is running long enough and certain parts of the program are executed frequently enough, TLB misses can outweigh even page fault costs.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 1944-1947</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The measured overhead, computed by dividing the time needed when using one single cache line versus a separate cache line for each thread, is 390%, 734%, and 1,147% respectively. These large numbers might be surprising at first sight but, when thinking about the cache interaction needed, it should be obvious. The cache line is pulled from one processor’s cache just after it has finished writing to the cache line. All processors, except the one which has the cache line at any given moment, are delayed and cannot do anything. Each additional processor will just cause more delays.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 2166-2170</div></div><p>For these reasons, manufacturers like Apple have moved to architectures called System On a Chip (SOC). These have many, many cores and include the RAM very close to these chips and their caches, with very wide buses. As Drepper mentions several times, coordination between the various components from various manufacturers must be very finely coordinated. The SOC approach collects all of these components under the aegis of one manufacturer and opens up the possibility for improving cache coherence and interaction with memory. Interesting times.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;In general the best advice which can be given is 1. Separate at least read-only (after initialization) and read-write variables. Maybe extend this separation to read-mostly variables as a third category. 2. Group read-write variables which are used together into a structure. Using a structure is the only way to ensure the memory locations for all of those variables are close together in a way which is translated consistently by all gcc versions..&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 2208-2211</div></div><p>This aligns pretty well with the advice to use immutable data structures as much as possible. It also explains why it&rsquo;s often faster to just create a memcopy of a structure with a modified value than it is to just modify the value directly. The <em>initial</em> modification costs less, but the overall cost of using a structure that <em>can</em> be modified ends up being much more over the lifetime of the program. The compiler will simply not be able to optimize cache usage for a mutable data structure.</p>
<p>Again, for most of us programmers, we won&rsquo;t have very much direct control over any of this, but knowing how it all works is very helpful in being able to predict when you&rsquo;re doing something really silly. Remember: your application logic is probably operating at a level of abstraction where you can concern yourself with being as explicit and clear about what your code needs and does as possible and letting the compiler and runtime do the best it can with it. Use immutable data, use non-nullable references, avoid side-effects (be pure), use task libraries for concurrency…and you should be OK almost all of the time.</p>
<p><hr></p>
<div class="footnote-reference"><span id="footnote_DRAFTABLE_ENTRY_4301_1_body" class="footnote-number">[1]</span> Disclaimer: these are notes I took while reading this book. They include citations I found interesting or enlightening or particularly well-written. In some cases, I&rsquo;ve pointed out which of these applies to which citation; in others, I have not. Any benefit you gain from reading these notes is purely incidental to the purpose they serve of reminding me of what I once read. Please see Wikipedia for a summary if I&rsquo;ve failed to provide one sufficient for your purposes. If my notes serve to trigger an interest in this book, then I&rsquo;m happy for you.</div><h2>Citations</h2><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The title of this paper is an homage to David Goldberg’s classic paper “What Every Computer Scientist Should Know About Floating-Point Arithmetic” [12]. This paper is still not widely known, although it should be a prerequisite for anybody daring to touch a keyboard for serious programming.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 49-51</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;A couple of bottlenecks are immediately apparent in this design. One such bottleneck involves access to RAM for devices. In the earliest days of the PC, all communication with devices on either bridge had to pass through the CPU, negatively impacting overall system performance. To work around this problem some devices became capable of direct memory access (DMA). DMA allows devices, with the help of the Northbridge, to store and receive data in RAM directly without the intervention of the CPU (and its inherent performance cost).&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 77-80</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Today all high-performance devices attached to any of the buses can utilize DMA. While this greatly reduces the workload on the CPU, it also creates contention for the bandwidth of the Northbridge as DMA requests compete with RAM access from the CPUs. This problem, therefore, must be taken into account.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 80-82</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;When we modify memory things get even uglier. Figure 3.20 shows the results for the sequential Increment test. This graph is using a logarithmic scale for the Y axis. So, do not be fooled by the apparently small differences. We still have about a 18% penalty for running two threads and now an amazing 93% penalty for running four threads. This means the prefetch traffic together with the write-back traffic is pretty much saturating the bus when four threads are used.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 898-901</div></div><p>Also security issues.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;[…] to accommodate the huge number of cells (chips with 109 or more cells are now common) the capacity to the capacitor must be low (in the femto-farad range or lower). A fully charged capacitor holds a few 10’s of thousands of electrons. Even though the resistance of the capacitor is high (a couple of tera-ohms) it only takes a short time for the capacity to dissipate. This problem is called “leakage”. This leakage is why a DRAM cell must be constantly refreshed. For most DRAM chips these days this refresh must happen every 64ms. During the refresh cycle no access to the memory is possible since a refresh is simply a memory read operation where the result is discarded.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 156-161</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;A second problem resulting from the tiny charge is that the information read from the cell is not directly usable. The data line must be connected to a sense amplifier which can distinguish between a stored 0 or 1 over the whole range of charges which still have to count as 1. A third problem is that reading a cell causes the charge of the capacitor to be depleted. This means every read operation must be followed by an operation to recharge the capacitor. This is done automatically by feeding the output of the sense amplifier back into the capacitor.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 162-165</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;A program selects a memory location using a virtual address. The processor translates this into a physical address and finally the memory controller selects the RAM chip corresponding to that address. To select the individual memory cell on the RAM chip, parts of the physical address are passed on in the form of a number of address lines.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 182-184</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;In the example the address lines a0 and a1 through the row address selection (RAS)9 demultiplexer select the address lines of a whole row of cells. When reading, the content of all cells is thusly made available to the column address selection (CAS)9 multiplexer. Based on the address lines a2 and a3 the content of one column is then made available to the data pin of the DRAM chip. This happens many times in parallel on a number of DRAM chips to produce a total number of bits corresponding to the width of the data bus.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 196-201</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Hardware and software prefetching (see section 6.3) can be used to create more overlap in the timing and reduce the stall. Prefetching also helps shift memory operations in time so that there is less contention at later times, right before the data is actually needed. This is a frequent problem when the data produced in one round has to be stored and the data required for the next round has to be read.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 395-398</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;While DMA is certainly beneficial, it means that there is more competition for the FSB bandwidth. In times with high DMA traffic the CPU might stall more than usual while waiting for data from the main memory.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 404-406</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;In symmetric multi-processor (SMP) systems the caches of the CPUs cannot work independently from each other. All processors are supposed to see the same memory content at all times. The maintenance of this uniform view of memory is called “cache coherency”.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 519-521</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;If a write access is detected and the processor has a clean copy of the cache line in its cache, this cache line is marked invalid. Future references will require the cache line to be reloaded. Note that a read access on another CPU does not necessitate an invalidation, multiple clean copies can very well be kept around.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 525-527</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;If these rules can be maintained, processors can use their caches efficiently even in multi-processor systems. All the processors need to do is to monitor each others’ write accesses and compare the addresses with those in their local caches […]&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 535-536</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Write-combining is a limited caching optimization more often used for RAM on devices such as graphics cards. Since the transfer costs to the devices are much higher than the local RAM access it is even more important to avoid doing too many transfers. Transferring an entire cache line just because a word in the line has been written is wasteful if the next operation modifies the next word. One can easily imagine that this is a common occurrence, the memory for horizontal neighboring pixels on a screen are in most cases neighbors, too. As the name suggests, write-combining combines multiple write accesses before the cache line is written out. In ideal cases the entire cache line is modified word by word and, only after the last word is written, the cache line is written to the device.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 814-819</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Processor operations on cache lines are frequent (of course, why else would we have this paper?) which means broadcasting information about changed cache lines after each write access would be impractical.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 832-834</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The state changes are accomplished without too much effort by the processors listening, or snooping, on the other processors’ work. Certain operations a processor performs are announced on external pins and thus make the processor’s cache handling visible to the outside. The address of the cache line in question is visible on the address bus.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 841-843</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;[…] the second processor wants to write to the cache line the first processor sends the cache line content and marks the cache line locally as Invalid. This is the infamous “Request For Ownership” (RFO) operation. Performing this operation in the last level cache, just like the I→M transition is comparatively expensive. For write-through caches we also have to add the time it takes to write the new cache line content to the next higher-level cache or the main memory, further increasing the cost.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 850-854</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;When we modify memory things get even uglier. Figure 3.20 shows the results for the sequential Increment test. This graph is using a logarithmic scale for the Y axis. So, do not be fooled by the apparently small differences. We still have about a 18% penalty for running two threads and now an amazing 93% penalty for running four threads. This means the prefetch traffic together with the write-back traffic is pretty much saturating the bus when four threads are used.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 898-901</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Finally in Figure 3.21 we have the numbers for the Addnextlast test with random access of memory. This figure is provided mainly to show the appallingly high numbers. It now takes around 1,500 cycles to process a single list element in the extreme case. The use of more threads is even more questionable. We can summarize the efficiency of multiple thread use in a table.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 916-918</div></div><p>This is why you use task libraries. Let the experts figure out what the optimal number of threads is for your tasks and the available hardware. If you&rsquo;re launching your own thread, you&rsquo;re almost certainly doing it wrong. This stuff is hard, as evidenced by this book.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;as soon as the L3 cache is not sufficient to hold the working set the numbers crash. They crash to the point that the speed-up of two and four threads is identical (see the fourth column in Table 3.3). This is one of the reasons why one can hardly find motherboard with sockets for more than four CPUs all using the same memory controller. Machines with more processors have to be built differently.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 926-928</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;As for the cache replacement there is not much a programmer can do. If the cache is using physical address tags there is no way to find out how the virtual addresses correlate with the cache sets. It might be that cache lines in all logical pages are mapped to the same cache sets, leaving much of the cache unused. If anything, it is the job of the OS to arrange that this does not happen too often. With the advent of virtualization things get even more complicated. Now not even the OS has control over the assignment of physical memory. The Virtual Machine Monitor (VMM, aka Hypervisor) is responsible for the physical memory assignment.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 995-999</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Program flow is much more predictable than data access patterns. Today’s CPUs are very good at detecting patterns. This helps with prefetching. As a result CPU designers spend a lot of time and chip real estate on branch prediction so that pipeline stalls happen as infrequently as possible.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 1006-1008</div></div><p>Oh, this was before Spectre and Meltdown ruined that party.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;A long pipeline means that if the pipeline stalls (i.e., the instruction flow through it is interrupted) it takes a while to get up to speed again. Pipeline stalls happen, for instance, if the location of the next instruction cannot be correctly predicted or if it takes too long to load the next instruction (e.g., when it has to be read from memory).&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 1021-1024</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;In early computer days memory was a premium. People went to great lengths to reduce the size of the program to make more room for program data. One trick frequently deployed was to change the program itself over time. Such Self Modifying Code (SMC) is occasionally still found, these days mostly for performance reasons or in security exploits. SMC&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 1024-1026</div></div><p>Forth was one such language/environment. One use would be to discard one-time init/startup code or large singleton initializers.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Finally, since the processor assumes–for simplicity reasons and because it is true in 99.9999999% of all cases– that the code pages are immutable, the L1i implementation does not use the MESI protocol but instead a simplified SI protocol. This means if modifications are detected a lot of pessimistic assumptions have to be made.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 1031-1033</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;If performance is really much more important than security, randomization can be turned off. The OS will then usually at least load all DSOs contiguously in virtual memory.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 1248-1249</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The cache into which the computed values are stored is called the Translation Look-Aside Buffer (TLB). It is usually a small cache since it has to be extremely fast. Modern CPUs provide multi-level TLB caches, just as for the other caches; the higher-level caches are larger and slower. The small size of the L1TLB is often made up for by making the cache fully associative, with an LRU eviction policy.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 1263-1266</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;In the first case the TLB is flushed whenever a context switch is performed. Since, in most OSes, a switch from one thread/process to another requires executing some kernel code, TLB flushes are restricted to leaving (and sometimes entering) the kernel address space. On virtualized systems it also happens when the kernel has to call the VMM and on the way back.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 1281-1284</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;One possibility to optimize the cache flushes is to individually invalidate TLB entries. For instance, if the kernel code and data falls into a specific address range, only the pages falling into this address range have to evicted from the TLB. This only requires comparing tags and, therefore, is not very expensive. This method is also useful in case a part of the address space is changed, for instance, through a call to munmap.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 1293-1296</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Overall, programmers must be aware that, with virtualization used, the cost of cache misses (instruction, data, or TLB) is even higher than without virtualization. Any optimization which reduces this work will pay off even more in virtualized environments. Processor designers will, over time, reduce the difference more and more through technologies like EPT and NPT but it will never completely go away.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 1379-1382</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;When data is produced and not (immediately) consumed again, the fact that memory store operations read a full cache line first and then modify the cached data is detrimental to performance. This operation pushes data out of the caches which might be needed again in favor of data which will not be used soon. This is especially true for large data structures, like matrices, which are filled and then used later. Before the last element of the matrix is filled the sheer size evicts the first elements, making caching of the writes ineffective.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 1539-1542</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The multimedia extensions previously mentioned in this section almost always require that the memory accesses are aligned. I.e., for 16 byte memory accesses the address is supposed to be 16 byte aligned. The x86 and x86-64 processors have special variants of the memory operations which can handle unaligned accesses but these are slower. This hard alignment requirement is nothing new for most RISC architectures which require full alignment for all memory accesses. Even if an architecture supports unaligned accesses this is sometimes slower than using appropriate alignment, especially if the misalignment causes a load or store to use two cache lines instead of one.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 1727-1731</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;These problems create stalls in execution with a possibly severe impact on performance. This is why today’s processors invest heavily in branch prediction (BP). Highly specialized BP units try to determine the target of a jump as far ahead of the jump as possible so that the processor can initiate loading the instructions at the new location into the cache. They use static and dynamic rules and are increasingly good at determining patterns in execution.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 1808-1812</div></div><p>Spectre and Meltdown are again a problem.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;if a function should never be inlined despite being small enough, the noinline function attribute can be used. Using this attribute makes sense even for small functions if they are called often from different places. If the L1i content can be reused and the overall footprint is reduced this often makes up for the additional cost of the extra function call. Branch prediction units are pretty good these days.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 1842-1845</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;if a function should never be inlined despite being small enough, the noinline function attribute can be used. Using this attribute makes sense even for small functions if they are called often from different places. If the L1i content can be reused and the overall footprint is reduced this often makes up for the additional cost of the extra function call. Branch prediction units are pretty good these days. If inlining can lead to more aggressive optimizations things look different. This is something which must be decided on a case-by-case basis.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 1842-1846</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;If the condition is frequently false, the execution is not linear. There is a big chunk of unused code in the middle which not only pollutes the L1i due to prefetching, it also can cause problems with branch prediction. If the branch prediction is wrong the conditional expression can be very inefficient.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 1854-1856</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Whenever conditional execution is used and it is lopsided (i.e., the expression far more often leads to one result than the other) there is the potential for false static branch prediction and thus bubbles in the pipeline. This can be prevented by telling the compiler to move the less often executed code out of the main code path.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 1856-1858</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;While page faults usually are a one-time cost, TLB misses are a perpetual penalty given that the TLB cache is usually small and it is flushed frequently. Page faults are orders of magnitude more expensive than TLB misses but, if a program is running long enough and certain parts of the program are executed frequently enough, TLB misses can outweigh even page fault costs.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 1944-1947</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Prefetching has one big weakness: it cannot cross page boundaries. The reason should be obvious when one realizes that the CPUs support demand paging. If the prefetcher were allowed to cross page boundaries, the access might trigger an OS event to make the page available. This by itself can be bad, especially for performance. What is worse is that the prefetcher does not know about the semantics of the program or the OS itself. It might therefore prefetch pages which, in real life, never would be requested.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 1975-1979</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The OS, when processing the packet, first has to determine what kind of packet it is. If the DCA hint is not ignored, the loads the OS has to perform to identify the packet most likely hit the cache. Multiply this saving of hundreds of cycles per packet with tens of thousands of packets which can be processed per second, and the savings add up to very significant numbers, especially when it comes to latency. Without the integration of I/O hardware (a NIC in this case), chipset, and CPUs such an optimization is not possible. It is therefore necessary to make sure to select the platform wisely if this technology is needed.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 2137-2141</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The measured overhead, computed by dividing the time needed when using one single cache line versus a separate cache line for each thread, is 390%, 734%, and 1,147% respectively. These large numbers might be surprising at first sight but, when thinking about the cache interaction needed, it should be obvious. The cache line is pulled from one processor’s cache just after it has finished writing to the cache line. All processors, except the one which has the cache line at any given moment, are delayed and cannot do anything. Each additional processor will just cause more delays.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 2166-2170</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;In general the best advice which can be given is 1. Separate at least read-only (after initialization) and read-write variables. Maybe extend this separation to read-mostly variables as a third category. 2. Group read-write variables which are used together into a structure. Using a structure is the only way to ensure the memory locations for all of those variables are close together in a way which is translated consistently by all gcc versions..&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 2208-2211</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Now a reader might ask a question: why would somebody use the complicated and longer code which utilizes CAS? The answer to this is: the complexity is usually hidden. As mentioned before, CAS is currently the unifying atomic operation across all interesting architectures. So some people think it is sufficient to define all atomic operations in terms of CAS. This makes programs simpler. But as the numbers show, the results can be everything but optimal. The memory handling overhead of the CAS solution is huge.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 2265-2269</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The processor cores themselves run at frequencies where, at full speed, even in perfect conditions, the connection to the memory cannot fulfill all load and store requests without waiting. Now, further divide the available bandwidth by the number of cores, hyper-threads, and processors sharing a connection to the Northbridge and suddenly parallelism becomes a big problem. Efficient programs may be limited in their performance by the available memory bandwidth.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 2295-2298</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The performance measurement counters of modern processors allow the observation of FSB contention. On Core 2 processors the NUS_BNR_DRV event counts the number of cycles a core has to wait because the bus is not ready. This indicates that the bus is highly used and loads from or stores to main memory take even longer than usual. The Core 2 processors support more events which can count specific bus actions like RFOs or the general FSB utilization.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 2301-2304</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;cachegrind is a simulator which does not use measurements from the processor. The actual cache implementation in the processor might very well be quite different. cachegrind simulates Least Recently Used (LRU) eviction, which is likely to be too expensive for caches with large associativity. Furthermore, the simulation does not take context switches and system calls into account, both of which can destroy large parts of L2 and must flush L1i and L1d. This causes the total number of cache misses to be lower than experienced in reality. Nevertheless, cachegrind is a nice tool to learn about a program’s memory use and its problems with memory.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 2691-2695</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Before the process terminates massif creates two files: massif.XXXXX.txt andmassif.XXXXX.ps; XXXXX is as before the PID of the process. The .txt file is a summary of the memory use for all call sites and the .ps is what can be seen in Figure&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 2709-2710</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;This is a nice separation of concerns. A GUI mindset would draw directly to screen. This streams data to handlers that transform data into outputs. Writing it like this is not overdesign. It makes the components simpler and more boring. It makes it testable. It&rsquo;s better to have more, but simpler components. Maximize obviousness.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 2710</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Each block represents one memory word. In this small region of memory we have four allocated blocks. The overhead due to the block header and padding is 50%. Due to the placement of the header, this automatically means that the effective prefetch rate of the processor is lowered by up to 50% as well. If the blocks were be processed sequentially (to take maximum advantage of prefetching), the processor would read all the header and padding words into the cache, even though they are never supposed to be read from or written to by the application itself. Only the runtime uses the header words, and the runtime only comes into play when the block is freed.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 2763-2767</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;This all means that memory used by the program is interspersed with memory only used by the allocator for administrative purposes. We might see something like this: Header Data Padding Each block represents one memory word. In this small region of memory we have four allocated blocks. The overhead due to the block header and padding is 50%. Due to the placement of the header, this automatically means that the effective prefetch rate of the processor is lowered by up to 50% as well. If the blocks were be processed sequentially (to take maximum advantage of prefetching), the processor would read all the header and padding words into the cache, even though they are never supposed to be read from or written to by the application itself. Only the runtime uses the header words, and the runtime only comes into play when the block is freed.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 2761-2767</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The most important thing to get right is the selection of representative tests to perform the measurements. If the test workload does not match the way the program is actually used, the performed optimizations might actually do more harm than good. For this reason, is it often hard to use PGO for libraries.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 2797-2799</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The waste of physical RAM would simply be too large. But very large pages have their advantages: if huge data sets are used, storing them in 2MB pages on x86-64 would require 511 fewer page faults (per large page) than using the same amount of memory with 4k pages. This can make a big difference. The solution is to selectively request memory allocation which, just for the requested address range, uses huge memory pages and, for all the other mappings in the same process, uses the normal page size. Huge page sizes come with a price, though. Since the physical memory used for large pages must be continuous, it might, after a while, not be possible to allocate such pages due to memory fragmentation. People are working on memory defragmentation and fragmentation avoidance, but it is very complicated.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 2875-2880</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;By using the same file name in the open call, multiple processes can share the same huge pages and collaborate.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 2887-2888</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;There are a few more details to iron out with respect to context switches (possible modification on the same processor) and accidental reloading of the cache line after a write on another processor. This is nothing that policies (cache flush on context switch) and extra flags, or separate cache lines for LL/SC instructions, cannot fix. In general, the LL/SC implementation comes almost for free with the implementation of a cache coherence protocol like MESI.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 2992-2995</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Neither the VALIDATE nor COMMIT operations automatically and implicitly create bus operations. This is the huge advantage transactional memory has over atomic operations. With atomic operations, concurrency is made possible by writing changed values back into main memory. If you have read this document thus far, you should know how expensive this is. With transactional memory, no accesses to the main memory are forced&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 3094-3097</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;In section 6.4.2, we already discussed how the lock prefix, available on x86 and x86-64, can be used to avoid the coding of atomic operations in some situations. The proposed tricks falls short, though, when there are multiple threads in use which do not contend for the same memory. In this case, the atomic operations are used unnecessarily. With transactional memory this problem goes away. The expensive RFO bus message are issued only if memory is used on different CPUs concurrently or in succession; this is only the case when they are needed. It is almost impossible to do any better.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 3108-3112</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Buffered (or registered) memory changes the situation: instead of directly connecting the RAM chips on the DRAM module to the memory, they are connected to a buffer which, in turn, is then connected to the memory controller. This significantly reduces the complexity of the electrical connections. The ability of the memory controllers to drive DRAM modules increases by a factor corresponding to the number of connections saved.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 3359-3362</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;As with registered DRAM, the question has to be asked: why is ECC DRAM not the norm? The answer to this question is the same as for the equivalent question about registered RAM: the extra RAM chip increases the cost and the parity computation increases the delay.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 3418-3420</div></div>      </div>
      </div>
        <div class="footer">
    <div class="footer-data"><div class="footer-links"><ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/contact.php" title="">Contact</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/support.php" title="">Support</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/privacy.php" title="">Privacy</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/rights.php" title="">Rights</a></li></ul></div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="copyright">Copyright (c) 1999-2026 earthli.com. All Rights Reserved.</div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="versions">Powered by <ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore/app_news.php">earthli News 3.7</a></li><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore" title="">earthli WebCore&trade; 3.7</a></li></ul></div></div>    </div>
      </div>
  </div>  </body>
</html>
]]>
  </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
      <title type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[Abaddon's Gate by James S.A. Corey (2013) (read in 2021)]]>
  </title>
    <id>https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=4273</id>
    <link href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=4273"/>
    <updated>2022-01-29T11:51:01+01:00</updated>
    <author>
        <name type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[Marco von Ballmoos]]>
  </name>
      <uri>https://earthli.com/users/marco</uri>
    </author>
      <summary type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<p><small class="notes">Standard disclaimer [1]</small></p>
<p>This is the third book of the <em>The Expanse</em> series. It tells the story of humanity&rsquo;s first interactions with The Ring, an alien artifact constructed by the protomolecule on Venus and launched into orbit out near Uranus. The Ring is guarded by a coalition of Belter, Martian, and... [<a class="complete-text-link" href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=4273">More</a>]</p>
]]>
  </summary>
      <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<html lang="en">
  <head>
    <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/themes/ice.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/fonts/raleway.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/core/medium.css">
  </head>
  <body>
<div class="style-controls">  <div class="page">
    <div class="page-body">
<div class="info-box-top">
<p>
Published by <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_user.php?name=marco" title="Marco von Ballmoos" class="visible">marco</a> on <span class="date-time">29. Jan 2022 11:51:01 (GMT-5)</span>
</p>
<p>
Updated by <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_user.php?name=marco" title="Marco von Ballmoos" class="visible">marco</a> on <span class="date-time">29. Jan 2022 11:52:41 (GMT-5)</span>
</p>
</div>
      <div class="text-flow wide">
  <p><small class="notes">Standard disclaimer [1]</small></p>
<p>This is the third book of the <em>The Expanse</em> series. It tells the story of humanity&rsquo;s first interactions with The Ring, an alien artifact constructed by the protomolecule on Venus and launched into orbit out near Uranus. The Ring is guarded by a coalition of Belter, Martian, and Earther forces, preventing anyone from approaching it until it can be investigated more thoroughly.</p>
<p>A young Belter takes his tiny &ldquo;slingshot&rdquo; ship on a mad ride out to The Ring and manages to shoot by the blockade, sailing straight into the middle of the The Ring…and coming to a sudden halt on the other side. His video broadcast shows him compressing into a bloody mess at 99G.</p>
<p>The Roci and its crew are doing well, having improved the ship with a railgun. Miller, after his death on Venus, is &ldquo;haunting&rdquo; Holden. He has been resurrected by the protomolecule as a simulacrum to communicate with humanity…and to help the protomolecule search for…something.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Miller nodded, but he looked like he was about to vomit. “There’s time’s I start knowing things that are too big for my head. It’s better in here, but there’re going to be some questions that don’t fit in me. Just thinking with all this crap connected to the back of my head is a full contact sport, and if I get too much, I’m pretty sure they’ll… ah… call it reboot me. I mean, sure, consciousness is an illusion and blah blah blah, but I’d rather not go there if we can help it. I don’t know how much the next one would remember.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 261</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;“So, yeah. The most complex simulation in the history of your solar system is running right now so that we can pretend I’m here in the same room with you. The correct response is being flattered. Also, doing what the fuck I need you to do.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 263</div></div><p>Holden wants to stay away from The Ring because he fears what might happen with Miller, but a reporter named Monica Stuart convinces him and his crew to help her do a documentary on both the crew of the <em>Roci</em> as well as heading to The Ring. They take the contract because Mars is trying to impound their ship, so this is a legal excuse to delay that process.</p>
<p>The <em>Nauvoo</em>—the Mormon generation ship that Fred Johnson had retrofitted into a giant bomb aimed at Eros in <em>Leviathan Wakes</em>—has been retrofitted again, into the <em>Behemoth</em>, a large, relatively unwieldy, but powerful-looking weapons ship. It is crewed by Captain Ashford, Security Chief Bull, and XO Michio Pa. This ship is headed for The Ring, as well.</p>
<p>Another chess piece is Clarissa Mao—Julie Mao&rsquo;s sister—who has changed her identity to Melba Koh as part of an elaborate plan to hunt and kill James Holden for having humiliated her father. She has retrained herself as a technical expert on the <em>Thomas Prince</em> (a battleship).</p>
<p>Anna, a pastor from a church on Europa, is on the same battleship. She&rsquo;s there, along with many other religious leaders, to try to figure out what The Ring means for humanity. It&rsquo;s a sort of spiritual voyage. Tilly, a good friend of hers, is married to a billionaire and is also on the same ship. She also coincidentally used to babysit Clarissa.</p>
<p>Here&rsquo;s a nice exchange between Anna and Bull:</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;“Do you believe in the concept of forgiveness? In the possibility of redemption? In the value of every human life, no matter how tainted or corrupted?”</p>
<p>&ldquo;“Fuck no,” Bull said. “I think it is entirely possible to go so far into the red you can’t ever balance the books.”</p>
<p>&ldquo;“Sounds like the voice of experience. How far have you been?”</p>
<p>&ldquo;“Far enough to know there’s a too damn far.”</p>
<p>&ldquo;“And you’re comfortable being the judge of where that line is?” [2]&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 359</div></div><p>The space on the other side of The Ring is a void, with only a mysterious station at the center of it, with ring gates opening on 1300 other systems. Any ship moving in it must stick to a speed limit of 600m/s or the station kills all of its systems and moves it to an orbiting junkyard. No-one has any idea how any of this works, nor how the physics behind it can be explained. This description reminded me of the main sentiment behind <em>Roadside Picnic</em> by the Strugatsky Brothers.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Protogen had named the protomolecule and decided it was a tool that could redefine what it meant to be human. Jules-Pierre Mao had treated it like a weapon. It killed humans, therefore it was a weapon. But radiation killed humans, and a medical X-ray machine wasn’t intended as a weapon. Holden was starting to feel like they were all monkeys playing with a microwave. Push a button, a light comes on inside, so it’s a light. Push a different button and stick your hand inside, it burns you, so it’s a weapon. Learn to open and close the door, it’s a place to hide things. Never grasping what it actually did, and maybe not even having the framework necessary to figure it out. No monkey ever reheated a frozen burrito.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 226</div></div><p>Clarissa/Melba executes her plan: she blows up another ship called the <em>Seung Yun</em>, but uses her connections on Monica&rsquo;s crew to make it look like the trigger came from the <em>Roci</em>. She also fakes a video broadcast from Holden claiming responsibility. The <em>Behemoth</em> fires a missile at the <em>Roci</em>, but Holden takes them into The Ring to escape.</p>
<p>The other ships eventually all follow the <em>Roci</em> into the Slow Zone, with mixed results. Some move too quickly and are brought to a brutal halt, like the initial slingshotter. Holden heads for the station at the center, to figure out what Miller is trying to tell him and to try to shut it down so that they can all escape. Clarissa breaks into the <em>Roci</em> with a mech suit and wreaks havoc, injuring Naomi, and finally succumbing to Anna&rsquo;s taser. She rallies using her glandular implants, but  they manage to capture her and hold her prisoner.</p>
<p>Holden ends up interfacing with the sphere and learns about the billion-year history of the protomolecule empire. It&rsquo;s a quasi-religious experience:</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;His sense of his own body had changed, shifted, expanded past anything he’d imagined before. The simple extent of it was numbing. He felt the stars within him, the vast expanses of space contained by him. With a thought, he could pull his attention to a sun surrounded by unfamiliar planets like he was attending to his finger or the back of his neck. The lights all tasted different, smelled different. He wanted to close his eyes against the flood of sensation, but he couldn’t. He didn’t have anything so simple as eyes. He had become immeasurably large, and rich, and strange. Thousands of voices, millions, billions, lifted in chorus and he was their song. And at his center, a place where all the threads of his being came together.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 264</div></div><p>The original civilization had sent the protomolecule to many potentially viable systems with instructions on how to build a wormhole gate through which the originators could then travel. This worked wonderfully for a long time—literally millions of years. The probe sent to the Solar System didn&rsquo;t work, but them&rsquo;s the breaks. Humanity discovered it and triggered it, but only long after the rest of the empire had been destroyed. What destroyed it? Something. Something powerful. The protomolecule civilization extinguished hundreds of systems in order to purge its enemy, but to no avail.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;“This station has been waiting for the all-clear signal to open the network back up for about two billion years. If they’d found a solve, they wouldn’t still be waiting. Whatever it was, I think it got them all.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 267</div></div><p>The builders of the protomolecule had been gone for billions of years, destroyed by something even more powerful than them. Despite their ability to span galaxies and billions of years, they were gone. What killed them? Was it still out there?</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;“We know it ate a galaxy spanning hive consciousness like it was popcorn, so that’s something. And we know it survived a sterilization that was a couple hundred solar systems wide.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 268</div></div><p>Michio Pa and Bull make an uneasy alliance against an increasingly unstable Ashford, eventually wresting control of the ship from him. Bull is paralyzed from the waist down, gets a mech, ignores doctor&rsquo;s orders, keeps working, keeps fighting, and ends up with an even better mech suit. He&rsquo;s not doing well, health-wise, though.</p>
<p>Holden is taken prisoner by Martian Marines, there are negotiations all around. Ashford is a prisoner on the Roci and still trying to stir up trouble. He bands with some of the religious leaders to stage a coup against Pa and Bull. They want to get control of the giant laser on the <em>Behemoth</em> in order to use it to destroy the station. It probably won&rsquo;t work, but religious fervor leads to certitude and righteousness, so they&rsquo;re more committed the more resistance they get.</p>
<p>The counter-plan is for all of the ships to shut down their reactors to convince the station that they mean no harm. That would take it out of &ldquo;war&rdquo; mode and leave all of the gates open again. The plan eventually works, but not without casualties (Bull). Clarissa gets Tilly to buy the <em>Roci</em> for her and then immediately gives it to its crew. She befriends Amos and works with him to repair the damage she&rsquo;d caused as they head back to Luna, where she will stand trial.</p>
<p>The Ring Gates are open, the station inert, the <em>Roci</em> is finally owned outright by its crew. Michio Pa is in charge of the Behemoth, which will be converted, once again, to a station named <em>Medina</em>. The protomolecule simulation named Miller is still lurking with Holden, searching for … something.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>“I wasn’t built to fix shit humanity broke,” Miller said. “I didn’t come here to open gates for you and get the lockdown to let you go. That’s incidental. The thing that made me just builds roads. And now it’s using me to find out what happened to the galaxy-spanning civilization that wanted the road.”</p>
<p>“Why does that matter now, if they’re all gone?”</p>
<p>“It doesn’t,” Miller said with a weary shrug. “Not a bit. If you set the nav computer on the Roci to take you somewhere, and then fall over dead a second later, can the Roci decide it doesn’t matter anymore and just not go?”</p>
<p>“No,” Holden said, understanding and finding a sadness for this Miller construct he wouldn’t have guessed was possible.</p>
<p>“We were supposed to connect with the network. We’re just trying to do that, doesn’t matter that the network’s gone. What came up off of Venus is dumb, kid. Just knows how to do one thing. It doesn’t know how to investigate. But I do. And it had me. So I’m going to investigate even though none of the answers will mean fuck-all to the universe at large.”</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 511</div></div><p>Humanity must decide what it&rsquo;s going to do next.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Miller turned to face Holden again, his blue eyes eerie and full of secrets. “Someone fought a war here, kid. One that spanned this galaxy and maybe more. My team lost, and they’re all gone now. A couple billion years gone. Who knows what’s waiting on the other side of those doors?”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 510</div></div><p><hr></p>
<div class="footnote-reference"><span id="footnote_DRAFTABLE_ENTRY_4273_1_body" class="footnote-number">[1]</span> Disclaimer: these are notes I took while reading this book. They include citations I found interesting or enlightening or particularly well-written. In some cases, I&rsquo;ve pointed out which of these applies to which citation; in others, I have not. Any benefit you gain from reading these notes is purely incidental to the purpose they serve of reminding me of what I once read. Please see Wikipedia for a summary if I&rsquo;ve failed to provide one sufficient for your purposes. If my notes serve to trigger an interest in this book, then I&rsquo;m happy for you.</div><div class="footnote-reference"><span id="footnote_DRAFTABLE_ENTRY_4273_2_body" class="footnote-number">[2]</span> I think anyone can be forgiven, but it&rsquo;s mostly about trusting them to not do it again. If they acted the way they did because of circumstances, then you can help them avoid a repeat. Like poverty, drugs, etc. Some people are just broken, though, and then it&rsquo;s about risk-management. Do they still have motive? No? Great. Do they still have means? No? Great. Means and motive? That&rsquo;s a problem. Then, the risk is high that innocent people will get hurt again.</div><h2>Citations</h2><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;“Hopefully it won’t come to that,” Fred said. The gantry’s gentle upward slope brought them to a platform arch. In the star-strewn blackness, a great plain of steel and ceramic curved away above them, lit by a thousand lights. Looking out at it was like seeing a landscape—this was too big to be something humans had made. It was like a canyon or a mountain.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 27</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;“We’re heading out to throw gang signs at Earth and Mars while the Ring does a bunch of scary alien mystery stuff. We’ve got a crew that’s never worked together, a ship that’s half salvage, and not enough time to shake it all down. Sure it’s a problem, but it’s not one we can fix, so we’ll do it anyway. Worst can happen is we’ll all die.”</p>
<p>&ldquo;“Cheerful thought,” Ashford said. The disapproval dripped off him.</p>
<p>&ldquo;Bull’s grin widened and he shrugged. “Going to happen sooner or later.”&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 29</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The movements came flowing out of a hindbrain that had been freed of restraint and given the time to plan its mayhem. It was no more a martial art than a crocodile taking down a water buffalo was; just speed, strength, and a couple billion years of survival instinct unleashed. Her tai chi instructor would have looked away in embarrassment.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 39</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;“The buffers are smart, but the design’s stupid,” he said. “They talk to each other, so they’re also a separate network, yah? Thing is, you put one in the wrong way? Works okay. But next time it resets, the signal down the line looks wrong. Triggers a diagnostic run in the next one down, and then the next one down. Whole network starts blinking like Christmas. Too many errors on the network and it fails closed, takes down the whole grid. And then you got us going through checking each one by hand. With flashlights and the supervisor chewing our nuts.”</p>
<p>&ldquo;“That’s… that can’t be right,” she said. “Seriously? It could have shut down the grid?”</p>
<p>&ldquo;“I know, right?” Ren said, smiling. “And all it would take is change the design so it don’t fit in if you got it wrong. But they never do. A lot of what we do is like that, boss. We try to catch the little ones before they get big. Some things, you get them wrong, it’s nothing. Some things, and it’s a big mess.”&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 81</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;“OPA tradition, maybe I’m wrong, is that someone does something that intentionally endangers the ship, they get to hitchhike back to wherever there’s air,” Bull said.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 100</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The flotilla was coming to the last leg of its journey. They had passed the orbit of Uranus weeks ago, and the sun was a bright star in an overwhelming abyss of night sky. All the plumes of fire were pointed toward the Ring now, bleeding off their velocity with every passing minute. Even though it was the standard pattern for Epstein drive ships, Melba couldn’t quite shake the feeling that they were all trying to flee from their destination and being pulled in against their will.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 118</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The new Martian ships had joined them, matched orbit, and were hanging quietly in the sky. The Earth flotilla, like the Behemoth, was in the last part of the burn, pulling up to whatever range they’d chosen to stop at. To say, We have come across the vast abyss to float at this distance and now we are here. We’ve arrived.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 137</div></div><p>How do you know when you&rsquo;ve stopped. Relative to what? The Ring? The Sun? Other ships? What does &ldquo;stop&rdquo; even mean?</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;“Yes, sir. It appears that the protomolecule or Phoebe bug or whatever you want to call it was launched at the solar system several billion years ago, aiming for Earth with the intention of hijacking primitive life to build a gateway. We’re positing that whoever created the protomolecule did it as a first step toward making travel to the solar system more convenient and practical later.”</p>
<p>&ldquo;Bull took a deep breath and let it out slowly. It was what everyone had been thinking, but hearing it spoken in this official setting made it seem more real. The Ring was a way for something to get here. Not just a gateway. A beachhead.&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 138</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;It was almost inevitable that people would die when the bomb went off. Vengeance called forth blood, because it always did. That was its nature, and she had made herself its instrument. Ren wasn’t her fault, he was Holden’s. Holden had killed him by making her presence necessary. If he had respected the honor of her family, none of this would have happened.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 154</div></div><p>Lovely logic of self-absolution.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The problem with living with miracles was that they made everything seem plausible. An alien weapon had been lurking in orbit around Saturn for billions of years. It had eaten thousands of people, hijacking the mechanisms of their bodies for its own ends. It had built a wormhole gate into a kind of haunted sphere. So why not the rest? If all that was possible, everything was.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 222</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Protogen had named the protomolecule and decided it was a tool that could redefine what it meant to be human. Jules-Pierre Mao had treated it like a weapon. It killed humans, therefore it was a weapon. But radiation killed humans, and a medical X-ray machine wasn’t intended as a weapon. Holden was starting to feel like they were all monkeys playing with a microwave. Push a button, a light comes on inside, so it’s a light. Push a different button and stick your hand inside, it burns you, so it’s a weapon. Learn to open and close the door, it’s a place to hide things. Never grasping what it actually did, and maybe not even having the framework necessary to figure it out. No monkey ever reheated a frozen burrito.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 226</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Scattered across the room in seemingly random places were two-meter-thick columns of something that looked like blue glass with black, branching veins shooting through it. The columns pulsed with light, and each pulse was accompanied by a subsonic throb that Holden could feel in his bones and teeth. It felt like enormous power, carefully restrained. A giant, whispering.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 234</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;“This place is the same,” Miller said. “There was supposed to be something. A lot of something. There was supposed to be… shit, I don’t have the right words. An empire. A civilization. A home. More than a home, a master. Instead, there’s a bunch of locked doors and the lights on a timer.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 235</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;“Score one for the good guys,” Nikos said from across the bay. His face was developing an ashy gray tone. Like he was dying. She wished he would go to the medical bays, but they were probably swamped. He could die here doing his work, or there waiting for an open bay.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 246</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Her disagreement was primarily with the level of glee over the destruction of the wicked that sometimes crept into the teachings. This was especially true in some millennialist sects that filled their literature with paintings of Armageddon. Pictures of terrified people running away from some formless fiery doom that burned their world down behind them, while smug worshipers—of the correct religion, of course—watched from safety as God got with the smiting. Anna couldn’t understand how anyone could see such a depiction as anything but tragic.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 248</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Miller nodded, but he looked like he was about to vomit. “There’s time’s I start knowing things that are too big for my head. It’s better in here, but there’re going to be some questions that don’t fit in me. Just thinking with all this crap connected to the back of my head is a full contact sport, and if I get too much, I’m pretty sure they’ll… ah… call it reboot me. I mean, sure, consciousness is an illusion and blah blah blah, but I’d rather not go there if we can help it. I don’t know how much the next one would remember.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 261</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;“So, yeah. The most complex simulation in the history of your solar system is running right now so that we can pretend I’m here in the same room with you. The correct response is being flattered. Also, doing what the fuck I need you to do.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 263</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;His sense of his own body had changed, shifted, expanded past anything he’d imagined before. The simple extent of it was numbing. He felt the stars within him, the vast expanses of space contained by him. With a thought, he could pull his attention to a sun surrounded by unfamiliar planets like he was attending to his finger or the back of his neck. The lights all tasted different, smelled different. He wanted to close his eyes against the flood of sensation, but he couldn’t. He didn’t have anything so simple as eyes. He had become immeasurably large, and rich, and strange. Thousands of voices, millions, billions, lifted in chorus and he was their song. And at his center, a place where all the threads of his being came together.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 264</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;From the station at his core, he reached out into the places he had been, the darkened systems that were lost to him, and he reached out through the gates with fire. The fallen stars, mere matter now, empty and dead, bloated. Filled their systems in a rage of radiation and heat, sheared the electrons from every atom, and detonated. Their final deaths echoed, and Holden felt a sense of mourning and of peace. The cancer had struck, and been burned away. The loss of the minds that had been would never be redeemed. Mortality had returned from exile, but it had been cleansed with fire.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 266</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;“This station has been waiting for the all-clear signal to open the network back up for about two billion years. If they’d found a solve, they wouldn’t still be waiting. Whatever it was, I think it got them all.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 267</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;“We know it ate a galaxy spanning hive consciousness like it was popcorn, so that’s something. And we know it survived a sterilization that was a couple hundred solar systems wide.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 268</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;“I said all right, Mister Baca!” Pa shouted. “That means I understood your point. You can stop making it. Because the one thing I don’t need right now is another self-righteous male telling me how high the stakes are and that I’d better not fuck things up. I got it. Thank you.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 277</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;“I think there was an empire once that touched thousands of stars. The Eros bug? That’s one of their tools. It’s a wrench. And something was big enough to put a bullet in them. Whatever it is could be waiting behind one of those gates, waiting for someone to do something stupid. So maybe you’d rather set up shop here. Make little doomed babies. Live and die in the darkness. But at least whatever’s out there stays out there.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 318</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;“The Behemoth has become the place to be,” Tilly continued. “If we never figure out how to escape this trap, it’s the place it will take us the longest to die. That makes it the high-rent district of the slow zone.”</p>
<p>&ldquo;“Well, that’s… important.” Tilly laughed. She pulled a cigarette out and lit it as they walked. At Anna’s shocked look she said, “They let you do it here. Lots of the Belters do. They obsess over air filters and then suck poisonous particulates into their lungs recreationally. It’s a fabulous culture.”&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 336</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;“Do you believe in the concept of forgiveness? In the possibility of redemption? In the value of every human life, no matter how tainted or corrupted?”</p>
<p>&ldquo;“Fuck no,” Bull said. “I think it is entirely possible to go so far into the red you can’t ever balance the books.”</p>
<p>&ldquo;“Sounds like the voice of experience. How far have you been?”</p>
<p>&ldquo;“Far enough to know there’s a too damn far.”</p>
<p>&ldquo;“And you’re comfortable being the judge of where that line is?”&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 359</div></div><p>I think anyone can be forgiven, but its mostly about trusting them to not do it again. If they acted the way they did because of circumstances, then you can help them avoid a repeat. Like poverty, drugs, etc. Some people are just broken, though, and then it&rsquo;s about risk-management. Do they still have motive? No? Great. Do they still have means? No? great. Means and motive? Problem. Risk is high that innocent people will get hurt again.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;“I don’t want to kill that girl,” he said, taking another sip of the terrible coffee. “In fact, I don’t give a shit about her one way or the other, as long as she’s locked up and isn’t a danger to my ship. The one you should talk to is Holden. He’s the one who’s gonna get the torches-and-pitchforks crowd wound up.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 359</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Tilly pulled her to her feet, and they hurried back to her tent, all thought of food forgotten. “Something very bad is happening on this ship,” Tilly said. Anna had to suppress a manic giggle. Given their current circumstances, things would have to be very bad indeed for Tilly to think the situation had gotten worse. Sure, they were all trapped in orbit around an alien space station that periodically changed the rules of physics and had killed a bunch of them, but now they’d decided to start shooting each other too.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 395</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;We keep acting without thinking and you think the solution is to do it one more time. You have allied yourself with stupid, violent men, and you are trying to convince yourself that being stupid and violent will work. That makes you stupid too. I will never help you. I’ll fight you now.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 398</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;He saw his coming death, and wasn’t afraid of it anymore. He’d miss all the good stuff to follow, but he’d help make it happen. And a very good person loved him. It was more than most people got in a lifetime.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 472</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;If he was sad about anything, it was that everything that was in motion now would keep on being in motion without him, and he’d never know how it went. Never know if anything he’d done had made a difference.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 481</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The bad guys were just under a kilometer away. Holden didn’t think he’d be able to hit a stationary transport shuttle at that range, much less a rapidly moving man-sized target. But after having spent some time with Bobbie Draper, Holden knew that if Cass was taking the shots, it was because she thought she had a chance to score hits. He wasn’t about to argue with her.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 495</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Miller laughed. Something in the timbre of his voice had changed since the last time Holden had spoken to him. He sounded serene, whole. Vast. “Kid, I’m not even here. But we needed a place to talk, and this seemed nicer than a white void. I’ve got processing power to spare now.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 507</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Miller turned to face Holden again, his blue eyes eerie and full of secrets. “Someone fought a war here, kid. One that spanned this galaxy and maybe more. My team lost, and they’re all gone now. A couple billion years gone. Who knows what’s waiting on the other side of those doors?”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 510</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>“I wasn’t built to fix shit humanity broke,” Miller said. “I didn’t come here to open gates for you and get the lockdown to let you go. That’s incidental. The thing that made me just builds roads. And now it’s using me to find out what happened to the galaxy-spanning civilization that wanted the road.”</p>
<p>“Why does that matter now, if they’re all gone?”</p>
<p>“It doesn’t,” Miller said with a weary shrug. “Not a bit. If you set the nav computer on the Roci to take you somewhere, and then fall over dead a second later, can the Roci decide it doesn’t matter anymore and just not go?”</p>
<p>“No,” Holden said, understanding and finding a sadness for this Miller construct he wouldn’t have guessed was possible.</p>
<p>“We were supposed to connect with the network. We’re just trying to do that, doesn’t matter that the network’s gone. What came up off of Venus is dumb, kid. Just knows how to do one thing. It doesn’t know how to investigate. But I do. And it had me. So I’m going to investigate even though none of the answers will mean fuck-all to the universe at large.”</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 511</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;She knew that if the occasion arose, he would be perfectly willing to kill her. But until that moment, he’d be jovial and casual. That counted for more than she’d expected.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 522</div></div>      </div>
      </div>
        <div class="footer">
    <div class="footer-data"><div class="footer-links"><ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/contact.php" title="">Contact</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/support.php" title="">Support</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/privacy.php" title="">Privacy</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/rights.php" title="">Rights</a></li></ul></div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="copyright">Copyright (c) 1999-2026 earthli.com. All Rights Reserved.</div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="versions">Powered by <ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore/app_news.php">earthli News 3.7</a></li><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore" title="">earthli WebCore&trade; 3.7</a></li></ul></div></div>    </div>
      </div>
  </div>  </body>
</html>
]]>
  </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
      <title type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[Caliban's War by James S.A. Corey (2011) (read in 2021)]]>
  </title>
    <id>https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=4248</id>
    <link href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=4248"/>
    <updated>2022-01-28T16:56:49+01:00</updated>
    <author>
        <name type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[Marco von Ballmoos]]>
  </name>
      <uri>https://earthli.com/users/marco</uri>
    </author>
      <summary type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<p><small class="notes">Standard disclaimer [1]</small></p>
<p>The second book of the <em>The Expanse</em> begins on Ganymede, where we meet Prax Meng, a botanist of consummate skill and education. He has a daughter Mei with a debilitating but controllable disease. She is kidnapped from her pre-school. We also meet Bobbie Draper, a Martian Marine... [<a class="complete-text-link" href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=4248">More</a>]</p>
]]>
  </summary>
      <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<html lang="en">
  <head>
    <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/themes/ice.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/fonts/raleway.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/core/medium.css">
  </head>
  <body>
<div class="style-controls">  <div class="page">
    <div class="page-body">
<div class="info-box-top">
<p>
Published by <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_user.php?name=marco" title="Marco von Ballmoos" class="visible">marco</a> on <span class="date-time">28. Jan 2022 16:56:49 (GMT-5)</span>
</p>
</div>
      <div class="text-flow wide">
  <p><small class="notes">Standard disclaimer [1]</small></p>
<p>The second book of the <em>The Expanse</em> begins on Ganymede, where we meet Prax Meng, a botanist of consummate skill and education. He has a daughter Mei with a debilitating but controllable disease. She is kidnapped from her pre-school. We also meet Bobbie Draper, a Martian Marine deployed on the surface, opposing the Earth forces that are also stationed there. Tensions are already high when a mysterious humanoid without a spacesuit tears across the surface, eliminating the Earth forces as well as all of the Martian ones—except for Bobbie.</p>
<p>The <em>Rocinante</em> and its crew make their appearance months later, as part of the Fred Johnson-inspired support for Ganymede. They&rsquo;re there to bring food supplies to a planet that was, formerly, the breadbasket of the outer system. That was before the Martian/Earth conflict in its near orbit brought its primary food domes crashing down. Now, not only Ganymede, but much of the outer planets and the Belt are slowly starving.</p>
<p>Prax is an expert on simple complex systems. Unlike nature—which uses evolution and dozens of millions of years to build robust, immensely redundant systems—these are the only ones we&rsquo;re really capable of building. Prax is still desperately searching for Mei, but also witness to the societal decay of a planet he&rsquo;d called home for years. The air is bad, the food supplies inadequate, and the fragile ecosystem they&rsquo;d built to keep them alive is degrading on a remorselessly predictable curve.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;“It’s the basic obstacle of artificial ecosystems. In a normal evolutionary environment, there’s enough diversity to cushion the system when something catastrophic happens. That’s nature. Catastrophic things happen all the time. But nothing we can build has the depth. One thing goes wrong, and there’s only a few compensatory pathways that can step in. They get overstressed. Fall out of balance. When the next one fails, there are even fewer paths, and then they’re more stressed. It’s a simple complex system. That’s the technical name for it. Because it’s simple, it’s prone to cascades, and because it’s complex, you can’t predict what’s going to fail. Or how. It’s computationally impossible.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 152</div></div><p>The Roci&rsquo;s crew finds Prax and helps him find a lab where Mei was being held. The scientists were experimenting on her and others with the same autoimmune disease as her with the protomolecule. The <em>evil</em> scientists escape in a firefight. The Roci&rsquo;s crew also escapes the increasingly unstable planet with Prax in tow, although he&rsquo;s distraught that he will now never find Mei.</p>
<p>Prax contemplates this journey,</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Ganymede was a day and a half behind him and already too small to pick out with the naked eye. Jupiter was a dim disk the size of a pinky nail, kicking back the light of a sun that was little more than an extremely bright star. Intellectually, he knew that he was falling sunward, heading in from the Jovian system toward the Belt. In a week, the sun would be close to twice the size it was now, and it would still be insignificant. In a context of such immensity, of distances and speeds so far above any meaningful human experience, it seemed like nothing should matter.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 260</div></div><p>The next part picks up with peace talks between Mars and Earth. Part of the discussions are an investigation into what happened on Ganymede. Bobbie Draper is there as part of the Martian contingent, but she speaks her mind and is ejected from the Martian team. Chrisjen Avasarala shows up as part of the Earth contingent. She&rsquo;s a no-bullshit, goal-oriented, cheerily anarchist, no-holds-barred older woman. Swears like a sailor. Eats pistachios all the time. Likes to be underestimated. Avasarala hires Bobbie on the spot. Together, they discover that the U.N. is trying to breed protomolecule super-soldiers and also trying to get rid of Avasarala.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;They’d tricked her. She’d sat there, pulling strings and trading favors and thinking that she was doing something real. For months—maybe years —she hadn’t noticed that she was being closed out. They’d made a fool of her. She should have been humiliated. Instead, she felt alive. This was her game, and if she was behind at halftime, it only meant they expected her to lose. There was nothing better than being underestimated.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 317</div></div><p>This is no doubt in no small part due to her basic lack of respect for her mentally inferior superiors.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;"Just don’t let the bobble-head talk about Venus or Eros.”</p>
<p>&ldquo;His flinch was almost subliminal. “Please, can we not refer to the secretary-general as ‘the bobble-head’?”</p>
<p>&ldquo;“Why not? He knows I do. I say it to his face, and he doesn’t mind.”</p>
<p>&ldquo;“He thinks you’re joking.”</p>
<p>&ldquo;“That’s because he’s a fucking bobble-head. Don’t let him talk about Venus.”&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 57</div></div><p>Avasarala, her secretary Soren, and Bobbie head out to Ganymede at a leisurely pace on a ship owned by Jules-Pierre Mao (father of Julie Mao, the young woman who steered the protomolecule into Venus). They try to get on top of the situation while preparing for intervention where needed. Bobbie has her Martian Marine super-armor with her. She learns the ropes of working for Avasarala from Soren,</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;He started speaking slowly, as though to a dim child. “The boss wants you to come to the office, okay?”</p>
<p>&ldquo;Bobbie looked at the time again. “Right now?”</p>
<p>&ldquo;“No,” Soren said. “Tomorrow at the normal time. She just wanted me to call at four a.m. to make sure you were coming.”&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 222</div></div><p>As the Rocinante wings its way back to its home base Tycho Station, the crew discovers a protomolecule super-soldier stowaway. Prax assists the crew in tricking it into getting outside of the ship, where they flip it loose and ionize it in the drive plume.</p>
<p>The series is well-known for its depictions of the immensity of distance in space, especially seen through the Prax&rsquo;s trained eye.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;He was in a tiny metal-and-ceramic box that was exchanging matter for energy to throw a half dozen primates across a vacuum larger than millions of oceans. Compared to that, how could anything matter?&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 261</div></div><p>These next two are from when Prax was on his space-walk to lure the super-soldier out of the Rocinante. The passages nicely evoke why he&rsquo;d been warned about the euphoria of a true space-walk.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The darkness around him was overwhelming. The Rocinante was a raft of metal and paint on an ocean. More than an ocean. The stars wrapped around him in all directions, the nearest ones hundreds of lifetimes away, and then more past those and more past those. The sense of being on a tiny little asteroid or moon looking up at a too-wide sky flipped and he was at the top of the universe, looking down into an abyss without end. It was like a visual illusion flipping between a vase and then two faces, then back again at the speed of perception.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 301</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;He was the eye of God, drinking in the light of infinite stars, and he was a speck of dust on a speck of dust, clipped by his mag boots to the body of a ship unthinkably more powerful than himself, and unimportant before the face of the abyss. His suit’s speakers crackled with background radiation from the birth of the universe, and eerie voices whispered in the static.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 301</div></div><p>They get back to Tycho. Here is lovely passage showing how awestruck Prax is by the sight of Tycho Station,</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;Slowly, the great industrial sphere grew until it filled the screens, starlight replaced by the glow from equipment guides and a glass-domed observation bubble. Steel-and-ceramic plates and scaffolds took the place of the blackness. There were the massive drives that could push the entire station, like a city in the sky, anywhere in the solar system. There were the complex swivel points, like the gimbals of a crash couch made by giants, that would reconfigure the station as a whole when thrust gravity took rotation’s place. It took his breath away. The elegance and functionality of the structure lay out before him, as beautiful and simple and effective as a leaf or a root cluster. To have something so much like the fruits of evolution, but designed by human minds, was awe-inspiring. It was the pinnacle of what creativity meant, the impossible made real.</p>
<p>&ldquo;“That’s good work,” Prax said.&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 343</div></div><p>On Tycho, hothead Holden accuses Fred Johnson of having created the super-soldiers. He is, of course, wrong, because he doesn&rsquo;t consider the possibility that there is more than one sample left of the protomolecule. Johnson fires the Roci for Holden&rsquo;s impertinence.</p>
<p>After a bit of detective work, they figure out that the super-soldier factory (and Mei) are on Io, a moon of Jupiter. As luck would have it, that&rsquo;s also the direction in which Avasarala and Bobbie are headed (well, maybe, maybe not…it&rsquo;s about the same distance, as both Ganymede and Io are moons of Jupiter, but it&rsquo;s unknown whether their orbits just happen to be fortuitously aligned instead of on opposite sides of the ecliptic).</p>
<p>There&rsquo;s a bit of a hitch, as Avasarala is on Jules Mao&rsquo;s ship, which, while comfortable, is not under her command. Cue Bobbie in Marine armor to commandeer the ship. They take Julie Mao&rsquo;s racing pinnace the <em>Razorback</em> to intercept the the <em>Roci</em>. It gets complicated with Martian naval forces as well as U.N. forces loyal to Avasarala against U.N. forces loyal to Jules Mao and his super-soldier program. There is a great battle, won by the good guys.</p>
<p>They land on Io, rescue the kids (including Mei). Amos continues to be impressively confident and unutterably cool.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;“Cap,” Amos said with a grin. “Anything that kills me has already killed everyone else. I was born to be the last man standing. You can count on it.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 290</div></div><p>But he knows he&rsquo;s not the biggest bad-ass on the planet.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;Amos replied with another shrug. “The sergeant ain’t easy to read. But I don’t think she’d do him any deliberate harm, if that’s what you’re asking. Not that, you know, we could stop her.”</p>
<p>&ldquo;“Scares you too, does she?”</p>
<p>&ldquo;“Look,” Amos said with a grin. “When it comes to scrapes, I’m what you might call a talented amateur. But I’ve gotten a good look at that woman in and out of that fancy mechanical shell she wears. She’s a pro. We’re not playing the same sport.”&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 487</div></div><p>Bobbie fights in her armor nearly to the death with a super-soldier, finally killing it. Everything works out for everybody, in the end, with Bobbie heading back to Mars, Avasarala promoted, Prax heading back to Ganymede, and the bad guys brought to justice.</p>
<p>Prax is the consummate engineer, a refiner, and looks forward to getting back to Ganymede with his daughter. He is not even mad that everything he&rsquo;d known was mostly gone—instead he thinks about how it will all be better the second time, avoiding the mistakes of the first.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;There was something exciting about the prospect of rebuilding that was, in its fashion, even more interesting than the initial growth. To do something the first time was an exploration. To do it again was to take all the things they had learned, and refine, improve, perfect. It left Prax a little bit giddy.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 588</div></div><p>The protomolecule crashed on Venus by Miller and Julie Mao has completed its work and launches something into the outer solar system, out near Neptune.</p>
<p><hr></p>
<div class="footnote-reference"><span id="footnote_DRAFTABLE_ENTRY_4248_1_body" class="footnote-number">[1]</span> Disclaimer: these are notes I took while reading this book. They include citations I found interesting or enlightening or particularly well-written. In some cases, I&rsquo;ve pointed out which of these applies to which citation; in others, I have not. Any benefit you gain from reading these notes is purely incidental to the purpose they serve of reminding me of what I once read. Please see Wikipedia for a summary if I&rsquo;ve failed to provide one sufficient for your purposes. If my notes serve to trigger an interest in this book, then I&rsquo;m happy for you.</div><h2>Citations</h2><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The cart hummed and clanked, falling deeper under the surface ice, sliding into the network of tunnels that made up the bulk of the station.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 31</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The elevator that rose from the common lobby and meeting rooms up to the offices glittered like spun diamond set in steel and was big enough to seat dinner for four. It recognized them as they stepped in, and began its careful rise through the levels. Outside the windows of the common areas, the Binnenhof seemed to sink and the huge anthill of buildings that was the Hague spread out under a perfect blue sky. It was springtime, and the snow that had touched the city since December was finally gone.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 54</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;"Just don’t let the bobble-head talk about Venus or Eros.”</p>
<p>&ldquo;His flinch was almost subliminal. “Please, can we not refer to the secretary-general as ‘the bobble-head’?”</p>
<p>&ldquo;“Why not? He knows I do. I say it to his face, and he doesn’t mind.”</p>
<p>&ldquo;“He thinks you’re joking.”</p>
<p>&ldquo;“That’s because he’s a fucking bobble-head. Don’t let him talk about Venus.”&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 57</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>“Food freighters?”</p>
<p>“We ship almost a hundred thousand kilos of food a day, and the fighting trapped a lot of those shipments on the surface. Now that the blockade is letting people through, they’re on their way out to make their deliveries.”</p>
<p>“Wait,” Holden said. “I’m waiting to land with relief food supplies for people starving on Ganymede, and you’re launching a hundred thousand kilos of food off the moon?”</p>
<p>“Closer to half a million, what with the backup,” Sam said. “But we don’t own this food. Most of the food production on Ganymede is owned by corporations that aren’t headquartered here. Lot of money tied up in these shipments. Every day it sat on the ground here, people were losing a fortune.”</p>
<p>“I …” Holden started, then after a pause said, “Somnambulist out.”</p>
<p>Holden turned his chair around to face Naomi. Her expression was closed in a way that meant she was as angry as he was.</p>
<p>Amos, lounging near the engineering console and eating an apple he’d stolen from their relief supplies, said, “This surprises you why, Captain?”</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 69</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The air was almost warm here, the barn-hot of bodies. It stank of keytone-acrid breath. Saint’s breath, his mother called it. The smell of protein breakdown, of bodies eating their own muscles to survive. He wondered how many people in the crowd knew what that scent was.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 114</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;“I’ve never met anyone else in my life who cared more about other people’s welfare, and less about their feelings,” she said. “But at least he’ll make sure everyone is well fed before he tells them all the many things they did wrong.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 117</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;It’s not healthy having God sleeping right there where we can all watch him dream. It scares the shit out of us. It scares the shit out of me. And so we all look away and go about things as if the universe were the same as when we were young, but we know better. We’re all acting like we’re sane, but …”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 135</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The relief ship’s mess hall was tiny and scarred by age. The woven carbon filament walls had cracks in the enameling, and the tabletop was pitted from years, maybe decades, of use. The lighting was a thin spectrum shifted toward pink that would have killed any plants living under it in about three days.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 148</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;“It’s the basic obstacle of artificial ecosystems. In a normal evolutionary environment, there’s enough diversity to cushion the system when something catastrophic happens. That’s nature. Catastrophic things happen all the time. But nothing we can build has the depth. One thing goes wrong, and there’s only a few compensatory pathways that can step in. They get overstressed. Fall out of balance. When the next one fails, there are even fewer paths, and then they’re more stressed. It’s a simple complex system. That’s the technical name for it. Because it’s simple, it’s prone to cascades, and because it’s complex, you can’t predict what’s going to fail. Or how. It’s computationally impossible.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 152</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;She had to admit, it made a sad kind of sense to do some early winnowing before spending the resources to educate people.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 170</div></div><p>That&rsquo;s not what she said. She said <em>university</em>. Other education exists.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;A culture where you could actually choose if you wanted to contribute? The work hours and collective intelligence of fifteen billion humans just tossed away as acceptable losses for the system. It made Bobbie sad to think of. All that effort to get to a point where they could live like this. Sending their kids to work at a coffee shop to see if they were up to contributing. Letting them live the rest of their lives on basic if they weren’t.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 170</div></div><p>So short-sighted. You can do things other than work.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;She <strong>tossed off</strong> the last of her tea and thought, I’ll need a ride.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 171</div></div><p>Tossed back would be more appropriate. &ldquo;Tossed off&rdquo; means something else that has nothing to do with drinking tea.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;“Missed someone,” Holden said. “Or else they called in their friends.”</p>
<p>&ldquo;“Don’t shoot them,” Prax said. “What if it’s Mei! What if they have her with them?” </p>
<p>&ldquo;“They don’t, Doc,” Amos said. “Stay down.”&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 189</div></div><p>The clarity of a gunfight. Kill or be killed. No time or room for nuance, which comes off looking demented.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;From somewhere to Prax’s right, the shotgun spoke twice. All four fell back. It was like something out of a prank comedy. Eight legs, swept at once. Four people Prax didn’t know, had never met, just fell down. They just fell down. He knew they were never getting back up.</p>
<p>&ldquo;“Wendell?” Holden said. “Report?”</p>
<p>&ldquo;“Caudel’s dead,” Wendell said. He didn’t sound sad about it. He didn’t sound like anything. “I think I broke my wrist. Anyone know where they came from?”</p>
<p>&ldquo;“Nope,” Holden said. “Let’s not assume they were alone, though.”&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 189</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;“Don’t worry about it. The thing is, my whole job is making her”—he jerked his head toward the closed door—“calm and happy. With her, everything’s top priority. And so nothing is, you know? I’ll do it when it needs doing. Until then, the bitch can bark a little if it makes her feel happy.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 221</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;He started speaking slowly, as though to a dim child. “The boss wants you to come to the office, okay?”</p>
<p>&ldquo;Bobbie looked at the time again. “Right now?”</p>
<p>&ldquo;“No,” Soren said. “Tomorrow at the normal time. She just wanted me to call at four a.m. to make sure you were coming.”&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 222</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;“You’re my liaison,” Avasarala said, the bags under her eyes so pronounced they looked less like fatigue and more like an undiagnosed medical condition. “So fucking liaise. Call your people.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 224</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;“That leaves a pretty large number of suspects,” the Pinkwater captain said. “Is there somebody you’ve pissed off I should know about?”</p>
<p>&ldquo;Holden’s eyes took on a pained expression and he made a motion as close to a shrug as he could manage, given the circumstances. “There’s kind of a list,” he said.</p>
<p>&ldquo;“Another bleeder here,” the woman said. “Check,” the drill man said. Tap, smoke, the smell of burning flesh.</p>
<p>&ldquo;“No offense meant, Captain Holden,” Wendell said, “but I’m starting to wish I’d just shot you when I had the chance.”</p>
<p>&ldquo;“None taken,” Holden replied with a nod.&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 226</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;“Find out how he got those ships,” she said. “Do it before you go to sleep. I want a full accounting. Where the replacement ships came from, who ordered them, how they were justified. Everything.”</p>
<p>&ldquo;“Would you also like a pony, ma’am?”</p>
<p>&ldquo;“You’re fucking right I would,” she said, and sagged against her desk. “You do good work. Someday you might get a real job.”</p>
<p>&ldquo;“I’m looking forward to it, ma’am.”&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 250</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Ganymede was a day and a half behind him and already too small to pick out with the naked eye. Jupiter was a dim disk the size of a pinky nail, kicking back the light of a sun that was little more than an extremely bright star. Intellectually, he knew that he was falling sunward, heading in from the Jovian system toward the Belt. In a week, the sun would be close to twice the size it was now, and it would still be insignificant. In a context of such immensity, of distances and speeds so far above any meaningful human experience, it seemed like nothing should matter.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 260</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;He was in a tiny metal-and-ceramic box that was exchanging matter for energy to throw a half dozen primates across a vacuum larger than millions of oceans. Compared to that, how could anything matter?&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 261</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;“Bobbie,” Soren said with a sigh that said he was tired of explaining simple things to her, but a grin that said he really wasn’t.</p>
<p>&ldquo;“This is how the game is played. Mars releases a statement condemning our actions. We go back channel and find an early draft. If it was harsher than the actual statement that was released, then someone in the dip corps argued to tone it down. That means they’re trying to avoid escalating. If it was milder in the early draft, then they’re deliberately escalating to provoke a response.”</p>
<p>&ldquo;“But since they know you’ll get those early drafts, then that’s meaningless. They’ll just make sure you get leaks that give you the impression they want you to have.”</p>
<p>&ldquo;“See? Now you’re getting it,” Soren said. “What your opponent wants you to think is useful data in figuring out what they think. So get the early draft, okay? Do it before the end of the day.”&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 273</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;“Cap,” Amos said with a grin. “Anything that kills me has already killed everyone else. I was born to be the last man standing. You can count on it.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 290</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;On the screen, the creature was slowly building a cloud of metal shavings. Prax wasn’t sure, because the resolution of the image wasn’t actually all that good, but it seemed like its hand might be changing shape as it dug. He wondered how much the constraints placed on the protomolecule’s expression took damage and healing into account. Regenerative processes were a great opportunity for constraining systems to fail. Cancer was just cell replication gone mad. If it was starting to change, it might not stop.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 299</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The darkness around him was overwhelming. The Rocinante was a raft of metal and paint on an ocean. More than an ocean. The stars wrapped around him in all directions, the nearest ones hundreds of lifetimes away, and then more past those and more past those. The sense of being on a tiny little asteroid or moon looking up at a too-wide sky flipped and he was at the top of the universe, looking down into an abyss without end. It was like a visual illusion flipping between a vase and then two faces, then back again at the speed of perception.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 301</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;He was the eye of God, drinking in the light of infinite stars, and he was a speck of dust on a speck of dust, clipped by his mag boots to the body of a ship unthinkably more powerful than himself, and unimportant before the face of the abyss. His suit’s speakers crackled with background radiation from the birth of the universe, and eerie voices whispered in the static.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 301</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Her boss had secretly started a war. He was working with the same corporations that had let the genie out of the bottle on Phoebe, sacrificed Eros, and threatened everything human. He was a frightened little boy in a good suit picking a fight he thought he could win because he was pissing himself over the real threat. She smiled at him. Good men and women had already died because of him and Nguyen. Children had died on Ganymede. Belters would be scrambling for calories. Some would starve.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 313</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;They’d tricked her. She’d sat there, pulling strings and trading favors and thinking that she was doing something real. For months—maybe years —she hadn’t noticed that she was being closed out. They’d made a fool of her. She should have been humiliated. Instead, she felt alive. This was her game, and if she was behind at halftime, it only meant they expected her to lose. There was nothing better than being underestimated.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 317</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Jules didn’t park his ships in orbit at a public station. He didn’t even use a Mao-Kwik corporate station. This was an entire fully functioning space station in orbit around Earth solely for his private spaceships, and the whole thing done up like peacock feathers. It was a level of extravagance that had never even occurred to her. She also thought it made Mao himself very dangerous. Everything he did was an announcement of his freedom from constraint. He was a man without boundaries. Killing a senior politician of the UN government might be bad business. It might wind up being expensive. But it would never actually be risky to a man with this much wealth and power. Avasarala didn’t see it.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 330</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Oh she sees it.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 331</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Slowly, the great industrial sphere grew until it filled the screens, starlight replaced by the glow from equipment guides and a glass-domed observation bubble. Steel-and-ceramic plates and scaffolds took the place of the blackness. There were the massive drives that could push the entire station, like a city in the sky, anywhere in the solar system. There were the complex swivel points, like the gimbals of a crash couch made by giants, that would reconfigure the station as a whole when thrust gravity took rotation’s place. It took his breath away. The elegance and functionality of the structure lay out before him, as beautiful and simple and effective as a leaf or a root cluster. To have something so much like the fruits of evolution, but designed by human minds, was awe-inspiring. It was the pinnacle of what creativity meant, the impossible made real. “That’s good work,” Prax said.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 343</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;“Couple more days, then,” Sam said, then knelt down and began pulling things out of her toolbox. “Mind if I start taking some measurements?”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 354</div></div><p>The word &ldquo;toolbox&rdquo; here is familiar, but unlikely. More likely just tiny drones with lidar. But why not? That&rsquo;s why I like space operas.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;“You gave me the only sample we knew of. But you assume that if you don’t know about it, it doesn’t exist. I’ve been putting up with your bullshit for over a year now,” Fred said. “This idea you have that the universe owes you answers. This righteous indignation you wield like a club at everyone around you. But I don’t have to put up with your shit.</p>
<p>&ldquo;“Do you know why that is?”</p>
<p>&ldquo;Holden shook his head, afraid if he spoke, it might come out as a squeak.</p>
<p>&ldquo;“It’s because,” Fred said, “I’m the fucking boss. I run this outfit. You’ve been pretty useful, and you might be again in the future. But I have enough shit to deal with right now without you starting another one of your crusades at my expense.”&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 359</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Especially since they’ll know you’re looking for it, and what I asked you to look for, Avasarala thought. Even if the income stream between Mao-Kwikowski, Nguyen, and Errinwright was in all the budgets right now, by the time Avasarala’s allies looked, it would be hidden. All she could do was keep pushing on as many fronts as she could devise and hope that they fucked up.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 382</div></div><p>This doesn&rsquo;t even acknowledge that we have blockchain now, to say nothing of in 300 years.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Even if the acceleration was perfectly smooth and the yacht never had to shift or move to avoid debris, her guts were used to a full g pulling things down. She hadn’t digested anything well since she’d come on board, and she always felt short of breath.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 383</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;That was the price for screwing up. More dead children. So she wouldn’t screw up anymore. She could practically see Arjun, the gentle sorrow in his eyes. It isn’t all your responsibility, he would say. “It’s everyone’s fucking responsibility,” she said out loud. “But I’m the one who’s taking it seriously.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 384</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;“What is truth?” Avasarala said. “I think Holden has a long history of blabbing whatever he knows or thinks he knows all over creation. True or not, he believes it.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 385</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;“I don’t know this Meng fellow, but playing with a few soybeans makes him as much an expert on the protomolecule as it makes him a brain surgeon. I’m very sorry, of course, about his missing daughter, but no. If the protomolecule were on Ganymede, we’d have known long ago. This panic is over literally nothing.”</p>
<p>&ldquo;“He can go on like that for hours,” Avasarala said, shutting down the screen. “And we have dozens like him. Mars is going to be doing the same thing. Saturating the newsfeeds with the counter-story.”</p>
<p>&ldquo;“Impressive,” Bobbie said, pushing herself back from the desk.</p>
<p>&ldquo;“It keeps people calm. That’s the important thing. Holden thinks he’s a hero, power to the people, information wants to be free blah blah blah, but he’s a fucking moron.”&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 387</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;“We all grieve in our own ways,” Avasarala said. “For what it’s worth, you’ll never kill enough people to keep your platoon from dying. No more than I can save enough people that one of them will be Charanpal.”</p>
<p>&ldquo;For a long moment, Bobbie weighed the words. Avasarala could almost hear the woman’s mind turning the ideas one way and then another. Soren had been an idiot to underestimate this woman. But Soren had been an idiot in a lot of ways. When at length she spoke, her voice was light and conversational, as if her words weren’t profound. “No harm trying, though.”</p>
<p>&ldquo;“It’s what we do,” Avasarala said.&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 391</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The station waldoes had to fire attitude rockets to keep their movements from shifting the station they were attached to. Everything, everywhere, a dance of tiny movements and the ripples they made.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 394</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;An ill or suffering plant could be moved into a community of well members of the species and, through proximity, improve, even if soil and water were supplied separately. Yes, it was chemically mediated, but humans were social animals, and a woman smiling up from the screen, her eyes seeming to look deeply into your own, and saying what you wanted to believe was almost impossible to wholly disbelieve.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 400</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;You’re the talker. I’ve seen you face down Fred Johnson, UN naval captains, OPA cowboys, and drugged-up space pirates. You talk out your ass better than most people do using their mouth and sober.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 431</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;He turned toward the galley, but the conversation wasn’t finished. </p>
<p>&ldquo;“If I had. If I had done those things, that would have been okay with you?”</p>
<p>&ldquo;“Oh, fuck no. I’d have broken your neck and thrown you out the airlock,” Amos said, clapping him on the shoulder.</p>
<p>&ldquo;“Ah,” Prax said, a gentle relief loosening in his chest. “Thank you.”</p>
<p>&ldquo;“Anytime.”&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 440</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;“These half-human things you’ve made? They aren’t your servants. You can’t control them,” Avasarala said. “Jules-Pierre Mao sold you a bill of goods. I know why you kept me out of this, and I think you’re a fucking moron for it, but put it aside. It doesn’t matter now. Just do not pull that fucking trigger. Do you understand what I’m saying? Don’t. You will be personally responsible for the single deadliest screwup in the history of humankind, and I’m on a ship with Jim fucking Holden, so the bar’s not low.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 456</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;“Bobbie?”</p>
<p>&ldquo;“Yeah.”</p>
<p>&ldquo;“That part where you told me I didn’t understand the danger I was in?”</p>
<p>&ldquo;“And you told me that I didn’t how the game was played.”</p>
<p>&ldquo;“That part.”</p>
<p>&ldquo;“I remember. What about it?”</p>
<p>&ldquo;“If you wanted to say ‘I told you so,’ this looks like the right time.”&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 458</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;We put all the data in a file and broadcast it to the universe. They can still kill us if they want to, but we can make it a pointless act of revenge. Keep it from actually helping them.”</p>
<p>&ldquo;“No,” Avasarala said. “Uh, no? You might be forgetting whose ship you’re on.”</p>
<p>&ldquo;“I’m sorry, did I seem to give a fuck that this is your ship? If I did, really, I was just being polite,” Avasarala said, giving him a withering glare. “You aren’t going to fuck up the whole solar system just because you’re a one-trick pony. We have bigger fish to fry.”&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 461</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;“I’ve read your psych profile. I know all about your ‘everyone should know everything’ naive bullshit. But how much of the last war was your fault, with your goddamned endless pirate broadcasts? Well?”</p>
<p>&ldquo;“None of it,” Holden said. “Desperate psychotic people do desperate psychotic things when they’re exposed. I refuse to grant them immunity from exposure out of fear of their reaction. When you do, the desperate psychos wind up in charge.”</p>
<p>&ldquo;She laughed. It was a surprisingly warm sound. “Anyone who understands what’s going on is at least desperate and probably psychotic to boot. Dissociative at the least. Let me explain it this way,” Avasarala said. “You tell everyone, and yeah, you’ll get a reaction. And maybe, weeks, or months, or years from now, it will all get sorted out. But you tell the right people, and we can sort it out right now.”&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 462</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;“So you want me to give all the info to your little political cabal back on Earth, when the entire reason for this problem is that there are little political cabals back on Earth.”</p>
<p>&ldquo;“Yes,” Avasarala said. “And I’m the only hope she’s got. You have to trust me.”</p>
<p>&ldquo;“I don’t. Not even a little bit. I think you’re part of the problem. I think you see all of this as political maneuvering and power games. I think you want to win. So no, I don’t trust you at all.”</p>
<p>&ldquo;“Hey, uh, Cap?” Amos said, slowly screwing the top onto his thermos. “Ain’t you forgetting something?”</p>
<p>&ldquo;“What, Amos? What am I forgetting?”</p>
<p>&ldquo;“Don’t we vote on shit like this now?”&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 464</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;When the shooting started, he would put the throttle down and try to move through the active combat zone as quickly as possible. It was why they were going to meet the UN ships in the first place. Running away would just have kept them in range a lot longer.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 476</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;“Juice coming,” Alex said, and Bobbie felt her couch prick her in half a dozen places. Cold pumped into her veins, quickly becoming white-hot. She shook her head to clear the threatening tunnel vision while Alex said, “Three … two …” He never said one. The Rocinante smashed into Bobbie from behind, crushing her into her crash couch. She remembered at the last second to keep her elbows lined up, and avoided having her arms broken as every part of her tried to fly backward at ten gravities.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 476</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;Amos replied with another shrug. “The sergeant ain’t easy to read. But I don’t think she’d do him any deliberate harm, if that’s what you’re asking. Not that, you know, we could stop her.”</p>
<p>&ldquo;“Scares you too, does she?”</p>
<p>&ldquo;“Look,” Amos said with a grin. “When it comes to scrapes, I’m what you might call a talented amateur. But I’ve gotten a good look at that woman in and out of that fancy mechanical shell she wears. She’s a pro. We’re not playing the same sport.”&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 487</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;“Reputation never has very much to do with reality,” she said. “I could name half a dozen paragons of virtue that are horrible, small-souled, evil people. And some of the best men I know, you’d walk out of the room if you heard their names. No one on the screen is who they are when you breathe their air.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 490</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;Holden considered pointing out the navigation information the Roci made available at every console, and then didn’t. Avasarala didn’t want him to show her how to find it herself. She wanted him to tell her. She wasn’t accustomed to pressing her own buttons. In her mind, she outranked him. Holden wondered what the chain of command actually looked like in this situation. How many illegal captains of stolen ships did it take to equal one disgraced UN official? That could tie a courtroom up for a few decades.</p>
<p>&ldquo;He also wasn’t being fair to Avasarala. It wasn’t about making him take her orders, not really. It was about being in a situation that she was utterly untrained for, where she was the least useful person in the room and trying to assert some control. Trying to reshape the space around her to fit with her mental image of herself.&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 509</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;He’d never flown to Io before, and the view of the moon at the edge of his screens was spectacular. A massive volcano of molten silicate on the opposite side of the moon was throwing particles so high into space he could see the trail it left in the sky. The plume cooled into a spray of silicate crystals, which caught Jupiter’s glow and glittered like diamonds scattered across the black. Some of them would drift off to become part of Jupiter’s faint ring system, blown right out of Io’s gravity well. In any other circumstance, it would have been beautiful.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 535</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;“That’s the game I play. You never win. You just don’t lose yet. Errinwright? He lost. Soren. Nguyen. I took them out of the game and I stayed in, but now? Errinwright’s going to retire with extreme prejudice, and I’m going to be given his job.”</p>
<p>&ldquo;“Do you want it?”</p>
<p>&ldquo;“It doesn’t matter if I want it. I’ll be offered it because if the bobble-head doesn’t offer it, people will think he’s slighting me. And I’ll take it because if I don’t, people will think I’m not hungry enough to be afraid of any longer. I’ll be answering directly to the secretary-general. I’ll have more power, more responsibility. More friends and more enemies. It’s the price of playing.”&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 572</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;I’m going to drop you into a hole so deep even your wife will forget you ever existed. I’m going to use Errinwright’s old position to dismantle everything you ever built, piece by piece, and scatter it to the winds. I’ll make sure you get to watch it happening. The one thing your hole will have is twenty-four-hour news. And since you and I will never meet again, I want to make sure my name is on your mind every time I destroy something else you left behind. I am going to erase you.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 583</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;There was something exciting about the prospect of rebuilding that was, in its fashion, even more interesting than the initial growth. To do something the first time was an exploration. To do it again was to take all the things they had learned, and refine, improve, perfect. It left Prax a little bit giddy.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 588</div></div>      </div>
      </div>
        <div class="footer">
    <div class="footer-data"><div class="footer-links"><ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/contact.php" title="">Contact</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/support.php" title="">Support</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/privacy.php" title="">Privacy</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/rights.php" title="">Rights</a></li></ul></div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="copyright">Copyright (c) 1999-2026 earthli.com. All Rights Reserved.</div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="versions">Powered by <ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore/app_news.php">earthli News 3.7</a></li><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore" title="">earthli WebCore&trade; 3.7</a></li></ul></div></div>    </div>
      </div>
  </div>  </body>
</html>
]]>
  </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
      <title type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[Subprime Attention Crisis by Tim Hwang (2020) (read in 2021)]]>
  </title>
    <id>https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=4285</id>
    <link href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=4285"/>
    <updated>2022-01-27T16:01:46+01:00</updated>
    <author>
        <name type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[Marco von Ballmoos]]>
  </name>
      <uri>https://earthli.com/users/marco</uri>
    </author>
      <summary type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<p><small class="notes">Standard disclaimer [1]</small></p>
<p>This is a short book about the digital advertising business, including its history, its present, and possible futures. The history is that the advertising business has always struggled with the essential fact that they are selling a largely unquantifiable product. There are <em>feelings... [<a class="complete-text-link" href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=4285">More</a>]</em></p>
]]>
  </summary>
      <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<html lang="en">
  <head>
    <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/themes/ice.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/fonts/raleway.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/core/medium.css">
  </head>
  <body>
<div class="style-controls">  <div class="page">
    <div class="page-body">
<div class="info-box-top">
<p>
Published by <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_user.php?name=marco" title="Marco von Ballmoos" class="visible">marco</a> on <span class="date-time">27. Jan 2022 16:01:46 (GMT-5)</span>
</p>
<p>
Updated by <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_user.php?name=marco" title="Marco von Ballmoos" class="visible">marco</a> on <span class="date-time">27. Jan 2022 23:31:57 (GMT-5)</span>
</p>
</div>
      <div class="text-flow wide">
  <p><small class="notes">Standard disclaimer [1]</small></p>
<p>This is a short book about the digital advertising business, including its history, its present, and possible futures. The history is that the advertising business has always struggled with the essential fact that they are selling a largely unquantifiable product. There are <em>feelings</em> about the effectiveness of advertising, but little evidence for the effectiveness of a particular ad. Effectiveness is measured in two ways: directly contributing to a sale (e.g. rebates, sales, etc.), or general brand-name buildup, which leads to familiarity. Basically: the short game and the long game.</p>
<p>Even in the old days, there were a lot of steps in between putting up a billboard along a highway and noticing an uptick in sales months later. How much did the billboard contribute? It&rsquo;s hard to say because there is no way to control for other factors. The online world is similar, but differs in an important way: the sellers of ad space claim that they can very precisely and accurately identify who looked at which advertisement for how long. This is the core claim that Hwang does a good job of dissecting and refuting.</p>
<p>Digital advertising is dominated by a few large firms with hordes of brokers and side markets and private markets. There is a lot of what Hwang calls <em>opacity</em> in the market. This occlusion makes it difficult for buyers to accurately determine the quality—and ensuing value—of the product they&rsquo;re buying as well as preventing them from having any way to determine whether they&rsquo;re getting a good price for it. On top of this problem is that digital advertising has been so successful for so long—its claims of efficacy largely unexamined by the buyers—that traditional advertising has not only suffered, but largely no longer exists. That means that even more money flows to digital advertising, raising prices even more. This, despite an almost complete lack of ability to verify claims of quality on the part of buyers.</p>
<p>The claims of quality are increasingly unbelievable because of a few other large factors: widespread fraud, a known reduction in advertising efficacy in younger generations, and a drastic increase in ad- and tracker-blocking for almost all users. Video advertising is touted as a savior, but almost all users skip ads as soon as they possibly can and a non-insignificant number of them use ad-blockers to eliminate them entirely.</p>
<p>Hwang argues that there is a huge bubble growing in this industry, with drastically inflated prices for an increasingly shoddy and unreliable product. He spends quite some time drawing a very apt comparison to the housing bubble of the 2000s.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;In the mortgage crisis, the complexity of the market in exotic financial instruments made it challenging to see that the underlying mortgages were extremely likely to default. If buyers had known that AAA-rated mortgage-backed securities contained so much bad debt, it would have been challenging to get anyone to buy the assets.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 62</div></div><p>Unfortunately, he&rsquo;s too generous in his general formulation: keeps stating things like this as if the perceived complexity was accidental. The scam was deliberate. People lied about the garbage they were selling. A lot of people believed it. Others knew that it was bullshit but knew that others wouldn&rsquo;t and that they could sell to them. That&rsquo;s how a Ponzi scheme works.</p>
<p>One of the main reasons that this con job has longer legs than it would otherwise have is that a large amount of the opacity has been achieved through technology. And people who don&rsquo;t understand anything about technology are absolutely willing to believe nearly anything about technology.</p>
<p>So, when they hear that digital advertising is not only <em>online</em> but also automatically brokered in nearly completely automated markets that instantaneously find the exact right ad to show for every single specific request based on the location of the ad-space, a giant profile of the user making the request, and dozens of bidders, each with their own highly tuned profile of what they&rsquo;re willing to buy and for how much, and that a request lands, bidding begins and ends, a sale is made and registered, and the ad is delivered within a few dozen milliseconds, then they can only marvel at the glory of it all and just be thankful that they&rsquo;re allowed to partake at all. Shut up and take my money, indeed.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;This highly automated arrangement has allowed online advertising exchanges to deliver mind-bogglingly large quantities of inventory night and day, unceasingly. As in the financial markets, algorithmic trading has become the rule, rather than the exception.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 63</div></div><p>But much of the ad-space being sold is fake—either the user isn&rsquo;t real or the device is in a farm somewhere, or both—or the price has been artificially inflated by fake bidders, or some other combination of scams that always appears whenever there are too many fools with too much money. Much of the money goes right into the pockets of the usual suspects. That&rsquo;s why they&rsquo;re largely unconcerned about policing the ever-increasing unsavory elements that prey on their ostensible customers: they get paid either way.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;[…] advertisers face the unenviable choice of buying ads on the unverifiable assurances of the major platforms or giving up the huge audiences these companies command. In this sense, the highly concentrated market of online advertising itself increases opacity in the marketplace.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 72</div></div><p>The problems for the rest of us are manifold. First of all, the design of the Internet that we use now largely serves the purpose of delivering ads and feeding this money-making machine. The tail is very much wagging the dog. The purpose of disseminating information has very much taken a back seat to figuring out how to charge people for information. And the primary model is to make people consume advertising in order to get access to the information they want.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The rise of programmatic advertising was not just a continuation of the commercialization of the web that was underway in the 1990s but also a process that actively shaped the rules and practices of how attention would be traded online.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 40</div></div><p>Second of all, because the Internet relies so heavily on it, any perturbation—like a crash or popping of the bubble—will have a drastic effect on the Internet and its users. The rich guys running this scam will, as usual, be just fine. They&rsquo;ll probably get richer. The rest of us will be scrambling to pay for access to an Internet that no longer knows how to survive.</p>
<p><hr></p>
<div class="footnote-reference"><span id="footnote_DRAFTABLE_ENTRY_4285_1_body" class="footnote-number">[1]</span> Disclaimer: these are notes I took while reading this book. They include citations I found interesting or enlightening or particularly well-written. In some cases, I&rsquo;ve pointed out which of these applies to which citation; in others, I have not. Any benefit you gain from reading these notes is purely incidental to the purpose they serve of reminding me of what I once read. Please see Wikipedia for a summary if I&rsquo;ve failed to provide one sufficient for your purposes. If my notes serve to trigger an interest in this book, then I&rsquo;m happy for you.</div><h2>Citations</h2><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;What we discover, when we get there, is less a picture of modern, data-driven wizards of consumer persuasion, and more a murky story of perverse incentives, outright fraud, and a web economy on the brink.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 8</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Today, online advertising is more Wall Street than local bookfair. The exchange of attention is facilitated through a massive global system of digital marketplaces. Attention is not just for sale online: it has been automated and streamlined in ways that we often fail to appreciate.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 13</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The jargon of programmatic advertising evokes a vision of the Wall Street of the 1980s. “Trade desks” buy and sell “inventory” on “exchanges.” You might imagine something out of movies like The Wolf of Wall Street and Trading Places: big, cavernous rooms packed with shouting traders in colorful vests. But this vision of how business is done is long out-of-date. The reality resembles the ultra-quantitative, high-frequency trading of Michael Lewis’s Flash Boys more than it does the predigital, smoke-filled rooms of Mad Men.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 17</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The modern online advertising ecosystem is a mind-bending, globe-spanning infrastructure designed to deliver billions of advertisements at split-second speeds every minute of every day. What you see at the end point—a banner advertisement that you may instantly forget, or a preroll video that you click to skip as quickly as you can—is only the tiniest piece of an incredibly complex system that is otherwise invisible as you move through the internet.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 18</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Publishers sell “inventory”: the opportunity for the buyer to display its message to someone who is paying attention to the publisher. The buyers vary: they include large companies buying advertising to promote their products and marketing agencies working on their behalf, as well as what are known as agency trading desks—specialized companies focused on navigating the programmatic advertising ecosystem.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 19</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The inventory must be bid upon and the actual advertisement delivered in the split-second moment between when you click to load something online and the time that the website or content on an app is finally loaded. The entire process of putting out a request for bids, making the bids, evaluating the bids, and delivering the advertisement takes place in under a hundred milliseconds—about a quarter of the time it takes you to blink.1 This happens millions and millions of times across the internet every second, without ceasing and largely without hiccups.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 20</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;These are known as demand-side platforms (DSPs) or supply-side platforms (SSPs). DSPs service the buyers, providing tools to specify certain parameters around their bidding and specify the audiences they would like to target. SSPs provide a suite of tools that are a mirror image of this for publishers, enabling sellers to specify auction rules, set price floors, and control the kinds of advertisers able to gain access to their inventory.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 20</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;As with the Nasdaq and the New York Stock Exchange, the buying and selling of advertising inventory does not take place all in one location. There exists a dense, networked set of ad exchanges that facilitate the meeting of supply and demand in this marketplace.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 21</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;This served to make a downturn in the mortgage market one that placed intense pressure on other parts of the economy at the same time.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 22</div></div><p>The utterly foreseeable and inevitable downturn. These systems are not built to last. They must last just long enough to extract rent. The betting parlor in <em>The Sting</em> wasn&rsquo;t meant to last either.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;[…] monetized through advertising into advertising businesses. It’s easy to forget that products like email were originally operated as fee-based businesses in which various features like storage and spam filtering were monetized as a subscription.5 Services like Gmail transformed this, using the advertising model to make email free to use and monetizing it through the sale of user attention.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 23</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;It’s easy to forget that products like email were originally operated as fee-based businesses in which various features like storage and spam filtering were monetized as a subscription.5 Services like Gmail transformed this, using the advertising model to make email free to use and monetizing it through the sale of user attention.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 23</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;[…] the internet has been actively designed at each stage in its history. An ever-compounding set of choices has resulted in the particular experience that we have of it today. This is true of the selection of advertising as a primary money machine for funding the web. It is also true of the precise way that we set these advertising marketplaces up. To that end, we need to say why the programmatic advertising ecosystem has ended up bearing such a close resemblance to the structure of the financial markets.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 33</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The rise of programmatic advertising was not just a continuation of the commercialization of the web that was underway in the 1990s but also a process that actively shaped the rules and practices of how attention would be traded online.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 40</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The efforts of companies like GoTo and AOL served to bundle user attention online and extract money from this attention through advertising. As a result, what was formerly a sphere of nonprofit and public research was transformed into a sphere of for-profit and private enterprise.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 42</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The transformation of attention into something monetizable is, of course, not a new phenomenon. Predigital advertising was engaged in the buying and selling of attention through billboards, newspaper ads, and television spots just as modern-day advertisers pay to grab attention online. The infrastructure of online advertising did not invent the commercialization of attention.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 42</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;What is different about the present-day online advertising system is the extent to which it has enabled the bundling of a multitude of tiny moments of attention into discrete, liquid assets that can then be bought and sold frictionlessly in a global marketplace.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 42</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Attention—a varied, heterogeneous, hard-to-define thing—underwent a similar process of commodification over the course of the 2000s, culminating in the programmatic marketplace.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 48</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;[…] the Interactive Advertising Bureau, or IAB), a private consortium dedicated to developing the standards that enable the online advertising market to function.39 In 2004, the IAB published its “Ad Impression Measurement Guidelines,” an initial set of foundational standards by which an ad is considered “delivered” to a consumer by the industry.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 49</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;[…] players from having a clear idea of what was going on.50 Past financial crises in markets around the world have shown that opaque government balance sheets and finances can also trigger doubt that escalates into panic.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 55</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Past financial crises in markets around the world have shown that opaque government balance sheets and finances can also trigger doubt that escalates into panic.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 55</div></div><p>Actually most crises are a transition from irrational to rational.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Opacity allowed these toxic assets to trade at prices far above what they were actually worth.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 56</div></div><p>Also an overarching willingness to believe that some other idiot would be left holding the bag.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Opacity isn’t dangerous only because it can cause errors in valuation. It also allows the active inflation of a market despite the fundamental shakiness of the thing being bought and sold.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 56</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;In the mortgage crisis, the complexity of the market in exotic financial instruments made it challenging to see that the underlying mortgages were extremely likely to default. If buyers had known that AAA-rated mortgage-backed securities contained so much bad debt, it would have been challenging to get anyone to buy the assets.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 62</div></div><p>He keeps stating this like the perceived complexity was accidental. The scam was deliberate. People lied about the garbage they were selling. A lot of people believed it. Others knew that it was bullshit but knew that others wouldn&rsquo;t and that they could sell to them. That&rsquo;s how a Ponzi scheme works.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;This highly automated arrangement has allowed online advertising exchanges to deliver mind-bogglingly large quantities of inventory night and day, unceasingly. As in the financial markets, algorithmic trading has become the rule, rather than the exception.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 63</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;“Dark pools” are a major phenomenon in the financial markets, accounting for some 14 percent of all equity volume traded in the United States.18 These are, in effect, private stock markets run by investment banks and other financial institutions about which no public information is available. These structures ostensibly serve to allow buyers and sellers to execute large-scale transactions without triggering reactive fluctuations in price on public exchanges like the Nasdaq.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 66</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Dark pools are controversial in the financial sector because the opacity they create provides opportunities for abuse. When the public markets no longer reflect the supply and demand of all players, the prices shown on these exchanges will not reflect the actual value of the security. Dark pools enable practices like “front-running,” in which high-frequency trading firms leverage their insider knowledge of these private marketplaces to profit off traders with slower access to information.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 66</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;PMPs are a growing segment of the transactions taking place in online advertising. In 2018, 45 percent of all the money spent in real-time bidding auctions took place within the confines of a PMP. Of the $19 billion that are projected to enter into the programmatic ad space between 2018 and 2020, the majority will go toward PMPs and other private arrangements.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 67</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;[…] the companies that brought about disintermediation have themselves become intermediaries in the advertising space. Google, Facebook, and major ad exchanges have huge sway over the rules of buying and selling ads because of their relative size and the high level of consolidation in the marketplace.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 69</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;[…] advertisers face the unenviable choice of buying ads on the unverifiable assurances of the major platforms or giving up the huge audiences these companies command. In this sense, the highly concentrated market of online advertising itself increases opacity in the marketplace.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 72</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;This divergence between the asset being bought—ad inventory—and the asset underlying it that defines its value—attention—directly parallels what happened to collateralized debt obligations (CDOs) during the 2007–2008 crisis.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 76</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;When a demand-side platform (DSP) is programmed to seek out opportunities to reach a demographic like “males 18 to 24 living in the United States,” it tells us whom the advertising will ideally reach, but not whether the people who actually see the ad will be persuaded, or even interested. This divergence between the asset being bought—ad inventory—and the asset underlying it that defines its value—attention—directly parallels what happened to collateralized debt obligations (CDOs) during the 2007–2008 crisis.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 76</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;We can think about any unit of advertising—a banner ad on a website or a billboard on the side of a highway—as a rough proxy for the collection of eyeballs that see it. In the same way that we might peel back a CDO to learn what mortgages it actually contains, we can peel back an ad and assess the quality of the attention that it captures.</p>
<p>&ldquo;When we do this, a twofold problem emerges. First, the value of the attention “packaged” by online advertising is declining. Online advertising is increasingly ignored—or actively resisted—by the public at large. Second, the “attention” that ads do receive is increasingly garbage—the product of a massive, fraudulent economy designed to extract money from advertisers.&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 76</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The vaporous nature of brand advertising means that the goalposts are perpetually moving: the objective of the advertiser may not be to drive any behavioral change that is actually measurable in any sensible time frame. It becomes hard to refute the effectiveness of advertising when the bar is set so low. But one thing is certain even in the brand advertising context: if the ad is never delivered in the first place, there is no way that it can be effective. Industry trends suggest that this is precisely what is happening in the programmatic ecosystem.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 80</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;But it turns out that mobile is where ad blocking has grown the most in the past few years. Ad blocker use on mobile devices grew by 40 percent to 380 million devices between 2015 and 2016. Fifty-nine percent of the smartphones in India implement ad blocking.15&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 82</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Undermined by visibility problems, indifference, and ad blocking, online advertising overall is increasingly subprime. It fails to truly capture attention or influence consumer behavior. And it gets worse. As the quality of real attention on offer declines, fraudsters continuously work to inflate the value of the attention inventory being sold.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 83</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Eighty-seven percent of all mobile devices on offer in the programmatic advertising markets in the United States in fall 2016 were fraudulent, meaning that they were either not real phones at all, or they were phones running automated scripts, unseen by any actual members of the public.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 85</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Domain spoofing is another popular scam, in which inventory on the programmatic marketplace is made to look like space on a high-value website when it, in fact, is not. Unwitting ad buyers pay top dollar for these opportunities, not realizing that their ads appear somewhere else entirely.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 85</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The perverse effect of ad fraud in the short and medium term is that it actually inflates the purported value of the global marketplace for digital advertising. Fake traffic driven by click farms and botnets makes ads look better and more effective than they actually are.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 87</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The movement of consumers to digital platforms makes it riskier and less attractive for ad buyers to buy into anything but digital advertising. The shift of advertising dollars onto online platforms accelerates the deterioration and disappearance of competing outlets for distributing ads. The disappearance of those competing outlets, in turn, accelerates the flow of money onto online platforms. Increasingly, all roads lead to the programmatic advertising economy.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 99</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The increase in mortgage failures cast doubt on the purported value of these assets, eventually triggering a widespread panic.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 103</div></div><p>Panic is misused here. The jig was up. People started rationally evaluating fairy tales and all got out. That&rsquo;s not irrational. What happened before was irrational.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The cumulative effect of these undisclosed margins on price is massive. One study by The Guardian suggests that some 70 percent of the money spent by buyers is consumed by the ad tech platform, with the publisher retaining the remainder.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 109</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;In Seeing Like a State, James C. Scott explores a helpful notion of what he terms “legibility.” In order to administrate at scale, governments and large bureaucracies need to be able to see the world effectively. The result is that the world is actively shaped in order to enable administration.</p>
<p>&ldquo;To set up a system of taxation, for instance, it is necessary to create a system of fixed identities so that the government can track over time which people have paid their taxes. Establishing a legible system of fixed identities may necessitate cultural changes, like introducing the concept of a last name to cultures that previously did not have one.&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 115</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The next Facebook or Google, to the extent that it is also driven by advertising, will need to structure attention in a way that makes its attention inventory salable in the broader marketplace. This means that securitization may be a one-way street: decisions made in the formative stage of the web limit what is possible in the future.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 117</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Society has only constructed online communities within the context of a web structured by online advertising, and so no norms and practices currently exist for using a space like SSM 3000.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 118</div></div><p>Untrue. NNTP and other communities do it without ads.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;[…] the purpose of mandated disclosure under such a regulation would be to ensure that buyers of online advertising have access to high-quality information about what it is they are buying in the first place. The decision on whether it is worth the price will be up to them.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 136</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Experts also felt that they had conclusively solved the problems of the past. Economists of the era expressed confidence that they had finally discovered the keys to ensuring stable economic growth and had effectively eliminated the risk of a future great recession. In 2003, the economist Robert Lucas told the American Economic Association that the “central problem of depression prevention has been solved, for all practical purposes, and has in fact been solved for many decades” by economists&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 139</div></div><p>Same thing now with MMT. Money is free. Ok. But you&rsquo;re shoveling it into a grossly inequitable system, exacerbating inequality instead of actually doing something useful. Massively inefficient.</p>
      </div>
      </div>
        <div class="footer">
    <div class="footer-data"><div class="footer-links"><ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/contact.php" title="">Contact</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/support.php" title="">Support</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/privacy.php" title="">Privacy</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/rights.php" title="">Rights</a></li></ul></div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="copyright">Copyright (c) 1999-2026 earthli.com. All Rights Reserved.</div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="versions">Powered by <ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore/app_news.php">earthli News 3.7</a></li><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore" title="">earthli WebCore&trade; 3.7</a></li></ul></div></div>    </div>
      </div>
  </div>  </body>
</html>
]]>
  </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
      <title type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[Strange Dogs by James S.A. Corey (2017) (read in 2021)]]>
  </title>
    <id>https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=4295</id>
    <link href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=4295"/>
    <updated>2022-01-27T15:43:43+01:00</updated>
    <author>
        <name type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[Marco von Ballmoos]]>
  </name>
      <uri>https://earthli.com/users/marco</uri>
    </author>
      <summary type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<p><small class="notes">Standard disclaimer [1]</small></p>
<p>A girl named Cara lives on a planet named Laconia with her parents, who are part of a research team. Laconia is one of the 1300 ring worlds discovered by humanity in The Expanse novels. Cara enjoys visiting a local pond, where she watches the strange and alien local fauna, in... [<a class="complete-text-link" href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=4295">More</a>]</p>
]]>
  </summary>
      <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<html lang="en">
  <head>
    <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/themes/ice.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/fonts/raleway.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/core/medium.css">
  </head>
  <body>
<div class="style-controls">  <div class="page">
    <div class="page-body">
<div class="info-box-top">
<p>
Published by <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_user.php?name=marco" title="Marco von Ballmoos" class="visible">marco</a> on <span class="date-time">27. Jan 2022 15:43:43 (GMT-5)</span>
</p>
<p>
Updated by <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_user.php?name=marco" title="Marco von Ballmoos" class="visible">marco</a> on <span class="date-time">27. Jan 2022 23:32:25 (GMT-5)</span>
</p>
</div>
      <div class="text-flow wide">
  <p><small class="notes">Standard disclaimer [1]</small></p>
<p>A girl named Cara lives on a planet named Laconia with her parents, who are part of a research team. Laconia is one of the 1300 ring worlds discovered by humanity in The Expanse novels. Cara enjoys visiting a local pond, where she watches the strange and alien local fauna, in particular the sunbirds. At twilight, &ldquo;strange dogs&rdquo; show up, but seem to pose no risk.</p>
<p>One day, Cara feeds a bit of her own food to a sunbird. She saw someone do something similar with a duck in a book about Paris on Earth—all of which is completely alien to her. The sunbird chokes on the alien chemistry and dies. Its two children are left alone and cannot reach the nest. Distressed, Cara runs home to get her mother&rsquo;s research drone, which she hopes to use to airlift the babies back to their nest. She fails, breaking the drone in the process.</p>
<p>The dogs return and leave with the sunbird mother&rsquo;s corpse. The next day, the mama sunbird is back, but slightly altered. It&rsquo;s alive, but no longer quite the same. The baby sunbirds interact with her just fine, though. Cara asks the dogs to repair the drone and they leave with it. The next day, the drone has been repaired as well.</p>
<p>Commandante Duarte has taken over the planet with his marines. One of the marines runs over Cara&rsquo;s brother Xan. Duarte visits her family&rsquo;s home to apologize and promise retribution. Cara sneaks Xan&rsquo;s body away from the funeral and brings it to the dogs. The next morning, Xan is alive but, like the mama sunbird, a little off. Cara&rsquo;s parents are repulsed by the reincarnation of Xan, with her father knifing him and barring him from the house. Cara sneaks out, finds Xan, and they head into the forest together, to seek refuge with the dogs.</p>
<p><hr></p>
<div class="footnote-reference"><span id="footnote_DRAFTABLE_ENTRY_4295_1_body" class="footnote-number">[1]</span> Disclaimer: these are notes I took while reading this book. They include citations I found interesting or enlightening or particularly well-written. In some cases, I&rsquo;ve pointed out which of these applies to which citation; in others, I have not. Any benefit you gain from reading these notes is purely incidental to the purpose they serve of reminding me of what I once read. Please see Wikipedia for a summary if I&rsquo;ve failed to provide one sufficient for your purposes. If my notes serve to trigger an interest in this book, then I&rsquo;m happy for you.</div><h2>Citations</h2><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;But if all the things in her books were about other places with other rules, then none of them could ever really be about her. It was like going to school one morning and finding out that math worked differently for you, so even if you got the same answer as everyone else, yours was wrong.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 14</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;She parked the cart in the soft ground at the water’s edge and stepped toward the trees. The already black night grew darker. There wasn’t even starlight here. Only an absence, like looking straight into the pupil of an eye as big as the world. She put her arms out, fingertips waving for the fronds and scrub that she knew was there but couldn’t see. Her eyes ached from trying to see anything. Her ears rang with the silence.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 45</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Uncertainty came over her in a wave. It was too big and too strange. Like she’d waved at the sun and it had waved back. Maybe this had been a bad idea, but it was too late now. She steeled herself to face whatever came from the black. The tramping drew nearer, louder. It multiplied and spread. They were coming.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 45</div></div>      </div>
      </div>
        <div class="footer">
    <div class="footer-data"><div class="footer-links"><ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/contact.php" title="">Contact</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/support.php" title="">Support</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/privacy.php" title="">Privacy</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/rights.php" title="">Rights</a></li></ul></div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="copyright">Copyright (c) 1999-2026 earthli.com. All Rights Reserved.</div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="versions">Powered by <ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore/app_news.php">earthli News 3.7</a></li><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore" title="">earthli WebCore&trade; 3.7</a></li></ul></div></div>    </div>
      </div>
  </div>  </body>
</html>
]]>
  </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
      <title type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[Gods of Risk by James S.A. Corey (2012) (read in 2021)]]>
  </title>
    <id>https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=4272</id>
    <link href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=4272"/>
    <updated>2022-01-24T14:55:05+01:00</updated>
    <author>
        <name type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[Marco von Ballmoos]]>
  </name>
      <uri>https://earthli.com/users/marco</uri>
    </author>
      <summary type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<p><small class="notes">Standard disclaimer [1]</small></p>
<p>This story takes place after Caliban&rsquo;s War, when Bobbie returns to Mars after having retired from the Mars Marines.</p>
<p>She&rsquo;s living with her brother and his family. Her nephew David is a gifted student, enrolled in the terraforming program at school. He&rsquo;s also a gifted chemist,... [<a class="complete-text-link" href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=4272">More</a>]</p>
]]>
  </summary>
      <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<html lang="en">
  <head>
    <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/themes/ice.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/fonts/raleway.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/core/medium.css">
  </head>
  <body>
<div class="style-controls">  <div class="page">
    <div class="page-body">
<div class="info-box-top">
<p>
Published by <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_user.php?name=marco" title="Marco von Ballmoos" class="visible">marco</a> on <span class="date-time">24. Jan 2022 14:55:05 (GMT-5)</span>
</p>
<p>
Updated by <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_user.php?name=marco" title="Marco von Ballmoos" class="visible">marco</a> on <span class="date-time">27. Jan 2022 23:32:59 (GMT-5)</span>
</p>
</div>
      <div class="text-flow wide">
  <p><small class="notes">Standard disclaimer [1]</small></p>
<p>This story takes place after Caliban&rsquo;s War, when Bobbie returns to Mars after having retired from the Mars Marines.</p>
<p>She&rsquo;s living with her brother and his family. Her nephew David is a gifted student, enrolled in the terraforming program at school. He&rsquo;s also a gifted chemist, so he&rsquo;s tempted to make extra money by creating drugs for a local dealer. This is the Breaking Bad storyline, I guess. David is infatuated with LeeLee, one of the girls who orbits the leader of the local gang.</p>
<p>In order to protected David, Bobbie starts working for the local gang, but she subverts their plans and manages to extricate David from the situation.</p>
<p><hr></p>
<div class="footnote-reference"><span id="footnote_DRAFTABLE_ENTRY_4272_1_body" class="footnote-number">[1]</span> Disclaimer: these are notes I took while reading this book. They include citations I found interesting or enlightening or particularly well-written. In some cases, I&rsquo;ve pointed out which of these applies to which citation; in others, I have not. Any benefit you gain from reading these notes is purely incidental to the purpose they serve of reminding me of what I once read. Please see Wikipedia for a summary if I&rsquo;ve failed to provide one sufficient for your purposes. If my notes serve to trigger an interest in this book, then I&rsquo;m happy for you.</div><h2>Citations</h2><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;“And if I say no?”</p>
<p>&ldquo;“I’ll kill you,” Aunt Bobbie said in the same matter-of-fact tone. “I’d prefer not to, but that’s what happens if you say no.”</p>
<p>&ldquo;“That easy?” Hutch said with a scowl. “Maybe not that easy.”</p>
<p>&ldquo;“You’re a tough guy, but I’m a nightmare wrapped in the apocalypse. And David is my beloved nephew. If you fuck with him after this, I will end every piece of you,” Bobbie said, her own smile sad. “No disrespect.”&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 56</div></div>      </div>
      </div>
        <div class="footer">
    <div class="footer-data"><div class="footer-links"><ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/contact.php" title="">Contact</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/support.php" title="">Support</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/privacy.php" title="">Privacy</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/rights.php" title="">Rights</a></li></ul></div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="copyright">Copyright (c) 1999-2026 earthli.com. All Rights Reserved.</div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="versions">Powered by <ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore/app_news.php">earthli News 3.7</a></li><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore" title="">earthli WebCore&trade; 3.7</a></li></ul></div></div>    </div>
      </div>
  </div>  </body>
</html>
]]>
  </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
      <title type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[Their Eyes Were Watching God by Zora Neale Hurston (1937) (read in 2021)]]>
  </title>
    <id>https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=4419</id>
    <link href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=4419"/>
    <updated>2022-01-24T00:00:43+01:00</updated>
    <author>
        <name type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[Marco von Ballmoos]]>
  </name>
      <uri>https://earthli.com/users/marco</uri>
    </author>
      <summary type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<p><small class="notes">Standard disclaimer [1]</small></p>
<p>Janie Crawford returns to the village where she has a home, crossing past the hooting and hollering peanut gallery stationed outside the town store. She continues onward, ignoring them, to visit her friend Pheoby, who&rsquo;d stood by her all the time she&rsquo;d been gone and who was... [<a class="complete-text-link" href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=4419">More</a>]</p>
]]>
  </summary>
      <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<html lang="en">
  <head>
    <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/themes/ice.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/fonts/raleway.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/core/medium.css">
  </head>
  <body>
<div class="style-controls">  <div class="page">
    <div class="page-body">
<div class="info-box-top">
<p>
Published by <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_user.php?name=marco" title="Marco von Ballmoos" class="visible">marco</a> on <span class="date-time">24. Jan 2022 00:00:43 (GMT-5)</span>
</p>
</div>
      <div class="text-flow wide">
  <p><small class="notes">Standard disclaimer [1]</small></p>
<p>Janie Crawford returns to the village where she has a home, crossing past the hooting and hollering peanut gallery stationed outside the town store. She continues onward, ignoring them, to visit her friend Pheoby, who&rsquo;d stood by her all the time she&rsquo;d been gone and who was dying to know what had happened since she&rsquo;d left.</p>
<p>The rest of the book is Janie recounting the story of her life that led to her, at about forty years old, sitting on that porch with her friend Pheoby.</p>
<p>Janie&rsquo;s recounting starts off roughly, with the story of her grandmother Nanny, who&rsquo;d raised her. Janie&rsquo;s mother Leafy was a child of rape by Nanny&rsquo;s overseer on the plantation where she&rsquo;d lived. Leafy is therefore lighter-skinned than Nanny. Though Nanny tries desperately, she can&rsquo;t protect Leafy from a miserable life in antebellum America. Once Leafy flowers, she is raped by a schoolteacher to produce Janie. Leafy takes to drink and runs away, leaving Janie with Nanny.</p>
<p>This is the setup for Janie&rsquo;s life: a family whose last two generations were produced by rape. Nanny is pretty gun-shy about anyone getting a good life at this point, so she quickly marries Janie off to Logan Killicks, at age seventeen. She lives on the older man&rsquo;s farm with him, but they&rsquo;re not really a married couple in the sense that there&rsquo;s any love in the relationship. Instead, Logan sees her as a hired hand and is constantly disappointed that she doesn&rsquo;t do more.</p>
<p>One day after breakfast, with Logan working the fields, nattily dressed Joe Starks happens by and Janie takes a powerful liking to him. He returns a few times over the next few weeks, eventually convincing Janie to run off with him to an all-black Mecca called Eatonville in Florida. Joe has a few hundred bucks with him and he uses it wisely to buy up a bunch of land, cajole settlers to come and buy it from him, and then to open a general store to service the budding town.</p>
<p>Janie and Joe run the store, but Janie doesn&rsquo;t love it. She realizes that Joe loves Joe and he&rsquo;s put her on a pedestal and doesn&rsquo;t think he needs to do anything else for her. The town is beholden to him for its start. It doesn&rsquo;t sit too well with them, but it&rsquo;s just kind of how things have always been.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The town had a basketful of feelings good and bad about Joe’s positions and possessions, but none had the temerity to challenge him. They bowed down to him rather, because he was all of these things, and then again he was all of these things because the town bowed down.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 50</div></div><p>Her life is naturally much better than with Logan Killicks, but she&rsquo;s still got a chain on her. Joe won&rsquo;t let her mix with the chatterers on the store&rsquo;s front porch, though she&rsquo;d dearly love to be closer to the townsfolk.</p>
<p>At one point, Joe shows mercy to a mule that&rsquo;s being driven to its death by a stingy and mean, penny-pinching farmer. He buys the mule and sets it free in town, feeding it and giving it a new lease on life. When it dies, the whole town turns out for a &ldquo;dragging out&rdquo; ceremony—only Janie is not invited because she&rsquo;s too good for it (obviously). The whole ceremony goes from farcical—<span class="quote-inline">&ldquo;[Joe] stood on the distended belly of the mule for a platform and made gestures&rdquo;</span>—to temporarily fabulous, when the vultures circling the mule wait for their leader, <span class="quote-inline">&ldquo;The Parson [, who] sat motionless in a dead pine tree about two miles off&rdquo;</span> to arrive and begin the feeding.</p>
<p>After twenty years of marriage, Janie is chafing at the leash. When Janie sees that Joe has gotten old and weak and possibly ill, she confronts him. But he has enough energy to tell her the way of the world.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;“Dat’s ’cause you need tellin’,” he rejoined hotly. “It would be pitiful if Ah didn’t. Somebody got to think for women and chillun and chickens and cows. I god, they sho don’t think none theirselves.”</p>
<p>&ldquo;“Ah knows uh few things, and womenfolks thinks sometimes too!”</p>
<p>&ldquo;“Aw naw they don’t. They just think they’s thinkin’. When Ah see one thing Ah understands ten. You see ten things and don’t understand one.”&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 71</div></div><p>Soon after, though, Joe weakens further and dies of failing kidneys. He would not let Janie see him in the final weeks of his life. When she finally gets inside his room, he is a shadow of his former self, weakly telling her to go.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;For the first time she could see a man’s head naked of its skull. Saw the cunning thoughts race in and out through the caves and promontories of his mind long before they darted out of the tunnel of his mouth. She saw he was hurting inside so she let it pass without talking.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 77</div></div><p>Janie inherits the house and the store and quite a bit of money in the bank. This naturally draws suitors from far and wide—and the townsfolk are all of the opinion that Janie had better settle down with someone because it&rsquo;s completely unseemly for a woman to own anything. This is a theme throughout the book: that the culture at that time was just unrelentingly misogynistic.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Honey, de white man is de ruler of everything as fur as Ah been able tuh find out. Maybe it’s some place way off in de ocean where de black man is in power, but we don’t know nothin’ but what we see. So de white man throw down de load and tell de nigger man tuh pick it up. He pick it up because he have to, but he don’t tote it. He hand it to his womenfolks. De nigger woman is de mule uh de world so fur as Ah can see.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 14</div></div><p>Janie is unimpressed with this all, enjoying a certain amount of freedom for the first time in her life. She dismisses all suitors until a young man named Tea Cake Woods shows up to sweep her off of her feet. He&rsquo;s 28 years old and adores and worships her. He asks her for nothing, instead using his prodigious gambling skills—and his willingness to work—to finance his courtship. They run off to Jacksonville, Florida to be married. Janie has $200 pinned to her blouse, but Tea Cake doesn&rsquo;t know about it—at first.</p>
<p>When Tea Cake discovers it, he actually does take it, but he spends it on a grand party that he thought she wouldn&rsquo;t be interested in. This part is a bit confusing because Janie truly loves him and forgives him his trespass. He swears he can win it all back—and does! He wins back $320 dollars, returning the $200 to Janie. All she had to do was stitch him up a bit from the light knifing he&rsquo;d taken when he left the game with all of the money.</p>
<p>They take their money and move to the &ldquo;muck&rdquo; in the Everglades, where they take up work planting and harvesting beans, among <span class="quote-inline">&ldquo;[p]eople ugly from ignorance and broken from being poor.&rdquo;</span> They don&rsquo;t always see eye-to-eye—and Janie is sometimes taken with jealousy—but Janie is finally in a loving relationship, where she is loved for being herself rather than as a field-hand or as a trophy or for her money.</p>
<p>When a big hurricane is coming in, Tea Cake and Janie decide to stick it out. This, despite the fact that all of the Seminole, most of the animals, and most of the rest of the town has long since headed east to safety. <span class="quote-inline">&ldquo;Several men collected at Tea Cake’s house and sat around stuffing courage into each other’s ears.&rdquo;</span></p>
<p>They soon regret their decision and flee their home with their cash, heading for Palm Springs, on the east coast of Florida. They hole up in a house for a while, but soon flee it, leaving their traveling companion to sleep out the storm.</p>
<p>On the road, they get trapped in some rising water. Exhausted, Janie grabs onto the tail of a cow that swims by. On the cow&rsquo;s back is a large dog that turns on her, snarling. Tea Cake pulls together his remaining energy and swims out to her, using his switchblade to subdue the dog and send it to its watery grave—but not before the dog bites him in the face.</p>
<p>Janie and Tea Cake make it to Palm Springs and Tea Cake is healed a few days later. With the hurricane past, they join the exodus westward, back to the &ldquo;muck&rdquo; and their home. After a few days, though, Tea Cake complains of stomach pains and a lack of hunger. He is unable to even drink water. He has rabies. The doctor says that it is much too late to do anything now and that Tea Cake should be in a ward to protect people from him as he goes through the last throes of the disease. Janie can&rsquo;t bring herself to do this and keeps him at home, to care for him until the last.</p>
<p>She&rsquo;s not stupid, though, and, while she doesn&rsquo;t unload his pistol, she does make sure the barrel is lined up so the three bullets will show up only after three empty shots. She keeps the long rifle for herself, having become an incredibly good shot thanks to Tea Cake&rsquo;s tutelage. Tea Cake, mad with the disease, confronts Janie with the pistol, fires three times empty, and Janie puts him down with a single rifle shot to the heart.</p>
<p>The town turns on her, of course, because she&rsquo;s a woman. There is a trial and the jury of twelve white people unanimously find in favor of Janie after only five minutes. Janie throws a magnificent funeral for Tea Cake, after which the townspeople forgive her. They instead find another scapegoat—the young man whom Tea Cake had madly—and completely unjustly—accused Janie of carrying on with.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Us colored folks is too envious of one ’nother. Dat’s how come us don’t git no further than us do. Us talks about de white man keepin’ us down! Shucks! He don’t have tuh. Us keeps our own selves down.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 39</div></div><p>Without Tea Cake, there is no Florida for Janie, and she returns to Eatonville and Pheoby. She is happy with how her life turned out. She wishes, of course, that she could have had Tea Cake longer, but she is grateful for the time she had. She doesn&rsquo;t care about the nattering of the people on the store&rsquo;s front porch,</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;[…] don’t feel too mean wid de rest of ’em ’cause dey’s parched up from not knowin’ things. Dem meatskins is got tuh rattle tuh make out they’s alive. Let ’em consolate theyselves wid talk. ’Course, talkin’ don’t amount tuh uh hill uh beans when yuh can’t do nothin’ else.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>She knows that her love with Tea Cake was finally the right one. She knows that no-one should tell anyone else what to do with love, that those who do, don&rsquo;t know what they&rsquo;re talking about.</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Then you must tell ’em dat love ain’t somethin’ lak uh grindstone dat’s de same thing everywhere and do de same thing tuh everything it touch. Love is lak de sea. It’s uh movin’ thing, but still and all, it takes its shape from de shore it meets, and it’s different with every shore.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>This book is absolutely wonderfully written. The southern patois takes some getting used to, but after a while, it flows as if it were your own dialect. Although the author/narrator does not write in patois, she does have a way of expressing herself that you don&rsquo;t read much anymore. For example, early in the book, she writes of the evening during which Janie regaled Pheoby with her tale,</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Time makes everything old so the kissing, young darkness became a monstropolous old thing while Janie talked.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 7</div></div><p>After Pheoby&rsquo;s gone home and Janie is in her home, alone, she feels a hint of loneliness. She goes upstairs to her bedroom,  a room still teeming with memories of her first days with Tea Cake,</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The kiss of his memory made pictures of love and light against the wall. Here was peace. She pulled in her horizon like a great fish-net. Pulled it from around the waist of the world and draped it over her shoulder. So much of life in its meshes! She called in her soul to come and see.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p><hr></p>
<div class="footnote-reference"><span id="footnote_DRAFTABLE_ENTRY_4419_1_body" class="footnote-number">[1]</span> Disclaimer: these are notes I took while reading this book. They include citations I found interesting or enlightening or particularly well-written. In some cases, I&rsquo;ve pointed out which of these applies to which citation; in others, I have not. Any benefit you gain from reading these notes is purely incidental to the purpose they serve of reminding me of what I once read. Please see Wikipedia for a summary if I&rsquo;ve failed to provide one sufficient for your purposes. If my notes serve to trigger an interest in this book, then I&rsquo;m happy for you.</div><h2>Citations</h2><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Time makes everything old so the kissing, young darkness became a monstropolous old thing while Janie talked.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 7</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Through pollinated air she saw a glorious being coming up the road. In her former blindness she had known him as shiftless Johnny Taylor, tall and lean. That was before the golden dust of pollen had beglamored his rags and her eyes.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 11</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;“So you don’t want to marry off decent like, do yuh? You just wants to hug and kiss and feel around with first one man and then another, huh? You wants to make me suck de same sorrow yo’ mama did, eh? Mah ole head ain’t gray enough. Mah back ain’t bowed enough to suit yuh!”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 13</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Honey, de white man is de ruler of everything as fur as Ah been able tuh find out. Maybe it’s some place way off in de ocean where de black man is in power, but we don’t know nothin’ but what we see. So de white man throw down de load and tell de nigger man tuh pick it up. He pick it up because he have to, but he don’t tote it. He hand it to his womenfolks. De nigger woman is de mule uh de world so fur as Ah can see.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 14</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Ah wanted you to look upon yo’self. Ah don’t want yo’ feathers always crumpled by folks throwin’ up things in yo’ face. And Ah can’t die easy thinkin’ maybe de menfolks white or black is makin’ a spit cup outa you: Have some sympathy fuh me. Put me down easy, Janie, Ah’m a cracked plate.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 20</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Us colored folks is too envious of one ’nother. Dat’s how come us don’t git no further than us do. Us talks about de white man keepin’ us down! Shucks! He don’t have tuh. Us keeps our own selves down.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 39</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;“Let colored folks learn to work for what dey git lak everybody else. Nobody ain’t stopped Pitts from plantin’ de cane he wanted tuh. Starks give him uh job, what mo’ do he want?”</p>
<p>&ldquo;“Ah know dat too,” Jones said, “but, Sam, Joe Starks is too exact wid folks. All he got he done made it offa de rest of us. He didn’t have all dat when he come here.”</p>
<p>&ldquo;“Yeah, but none uh all dis you see and you’se settin’ on wasn’t here neither, when he come. Give de devil his due.”&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 48</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The town had a basketful of feelings good and bad about Joe’s positions and possessions, but none had the temerity to challenge him. They bowed down to him rather, because he was all of these things, and then again he was all of these things because the town bowed down.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 50</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Out in the swamp they made great ceremony over the mule. They mocked everything human in death. Starks led off with a great eulogy on our departed citizen, our most distinguished citizen and the grief he left behind him, and the people loved the speech. It made him more solid than building the schoolhouse had done. He stood on the distended belly of the mule for a platform and made gestures.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 60</div></div><p>This is a farce! Wonderful!</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The Parson sat motionless in a dead pine tree about two miles off. He had scented the matter as quickly as any of the rest, but decorum demanded that he sit oblivious until he was notified.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 61</div></div><p>Now it&rsquo;s fabulous! The Parson is a vulture.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;“Dat’s ’cause you need tellin’,” he rejoined hotly. “It would be pitiful if Ah didn’t. Somebody got to think for women and chillun and chickens and cows. I god, they sho don’t think none theirselves.”</p>
<p>&ldquo;“Ah knows uh few things, and womenfolks thinks sometimes too!”</p>
<p>&ldquo;“Aw naw they don’t. They just think they’s thinkin’. When Ah see one thing Ah understands ten. You see ten things and don’t understand one.”&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 71</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Janie could see Jody watching her out of the corner of his eye while he joked roughly with Mrs. Robbins. He wanted to be friendly with her again. His big, big laugh was as much for her as for the baiting. He was longing for peace but on his own terms.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 72</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The years took all the fight out of Janie’s face. For a while she thought it was gone from her soul. No matter what Jody did, she said nothing. She had learned how to talk some and leave some. She was a rut in the road. Plenty of life beneath the surface but it was kept beaten down by the wheels. Sometimes she stuck out into the future, imagining her life different from what it was. But mostly she lived between her hat and her heels, with her emotional disturbances like shade patterns in the woods—come and gone with the sun. She got nothing from Jody except what money could buy, and she was giving away what she didn’t value.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 76</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Then one day she sat and watched the shadow of herself going about tending store and prostrating itself before Jody, while all the time she herself sat under a shady tree with the wind blowing through her hair and her clothes. Somebody near about making summertime out of lonesomeness.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 77</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;For the first time she could see a man’s head naked of its skull. Saw the cunning thoughts race in and out through the caves and promontories of his mind long before they darted out of the tunnel of his mouth. She saw he was hurting inside so she let it pass without talking.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 77</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;A big laugh started off in the store but people got to thinking and stopped. It was funny if you looked at it right quick, but it got pitiful if you thought about it awhile.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 78</div></div><p>She captures the essence of memes and hot takes 80 years before we grew enamored of them.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;“But anyhow, watch yo’self, Janie, and don’t be took advantage of. You know how dese young men is wid older women. Most of de time dey’s after whut dey kin git, then dey’s gone lak uh turkey through de corn.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 113</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Permanent transients with no attachments and tired looking men with their families and dogs in flivvers. All night, all day, hurrying in to pick beans. Skillets, beds, patched up spare inner tubes all hanging and dangling from the ancient cars on the outside and hopeful humanity, herded and hovered on the inside, chugging on to the muck. People ugly from ignorance and broken from being poor.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 131</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;They made good money, even to the children. So they spent good money. Next month and next year were other times. No need to mix them up with the present.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 132</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Ah hates dat woman lak poison. Keep her from round dis house. Her look lak uh white woman! Wid dat meriny skin and hair jus’ as close tuh her head as ninety-nine is tuh uh hundred! Since she hate black folks so, she don’t need our money in her ol’ eatin’ place. Ah’ll pass de word along. We kin go tuh dat white man’s place and git good treatment. Her and dat whittled-down husband uh hers! And dat son! He’s jus’ uh dirty trick her womb played on her.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 143</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Saturday afternoon when the work tickets were turned into cash everybody began to buy coon-dick and get drunk. By dusk dark Belle Glade was full of loud-talking, staggering men. Plenty women had gotten their knots charged too. The police chief in his speedy Ford was rushing from jook to jook and eating house trying to keep order, but making few arrests.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 149</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The next day, more Indians moved east, unhurried but steady. Still a blue sky and fair weather. Beans running fine and prices good, so the Indians could be, must be, wrong. You couldn’t have a hurricane when you’re making seven and eight dollars a day picking beans. Indians are dumb anyhow, always were.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 155</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;“De Indians gahn east, man. It’s dangerous.”</p>
<p>&ldquo;“Dey don’t always know. Indians don’t know much uh nothin’, tuh tell de truth. Else dey’d own dis country still. De white folks ain’t gone nowhere. Dey oughta know if it’s dangerous.&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 156</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Several men collected at Tea Cake’s house and sat around stuffing courage into each other’s ears.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 156</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The wind came back with triple fury, and put out the light for the last time. They sat in company with the others in other shanties, their eyes straining against crude walls and their souls asking if He meant to measure their puny might against His. They seemed to be staring at the dark, but their eyes were watching God.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 160</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The guards had a long conference over that. After a while they came back and told the men, “Look at they hair, when you cain’t tell no other way. And don’t lemme ketch none uh y’all dumpin’ white folks, and don’t be wastin’ no boxes on colored. They’s too hard tuh git holt of right now.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 171</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;And then too, Janie, de white folks down dere knows us. It’s bad bein’ strange niggers wid white folks. Everybody is aginst yuh.”</p>
<p>&ldquo;“Dat sho is de truth. De ones de white man know is nice colored folks. De ones he don’t know is bad niggers.” Janie said this and laughed and Tea Cake laughed with her.&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 172</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;“She didn’t kill no white man, did she? Well, long as she don’t shoot no white man she kin kill jus’ as many niggers as she please.”</p>
<p>&ldquo;“Yeah, de nigger women kin kill up all de mens dey wants tuh, but you bet’ not kill one uh dem. De white folks will sho hang yuh if yuh do.”</p>
<p>&ldquo;“Well, you know whut dey say ‘uh white man and uh nigger woman is de freest thing on earth.’ Dey do as dey please.”&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 189</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;“Naw, Ah ain’t mad wid Janie,” Sop went around explaining. “Tea Cake had done gone crazy. You can’t blame her for puhtectin’ herself. She wuz crazy ’bout ’im. Look at de way she put him away. Ah ain’t got anything in mah heart aginst her. And Ah never woulda thought uh thing, but de very first day dat lap-legged nigger come back heah makin’ out he wuz lookin’ fuh work, he come astin’ me ’bout how wuz Mr. and Mrs. Woods makin’ out. Dat goes tuh show yuh he wuz up tuh somethin’.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 190</div></div><p>Jaysus she sho is powerful good at showin de miserableness and small-mindedness and egocentricity of folks.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Dey gointuh make ’miration ’cause mah love didn’t work lak they love, if dey ever had any. Then you must tell ’em dat love ain’t somethin’ lak uh grindstone dat’s de same thing everywhere and do de same thing tuh everything it touch. Love is lak de sea. It’s uh movin’ thing, but still and all, it takes its shape from de shore it meets, and it’s different with every shore.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 191</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;“Now, Pheoby, don’t feel too mean wid de rest of ’em ’cause dey’s parched up from not knowin’ things. Dem meatskins is got tuh rattle tuh make out they’s alive. Let ’em consolate theyselves wid talk. ’Course, talkin’ don’t amount tuh uh hill uh beans when yuh can’t do nothin’ else. And listenin’ tuh dat kind uh talk is jus’ lak openin’ yo’ mouth and lettin’ de moon shine down yo’ throat. It’s uh known fact, Pheoby, you got tuh go there tuh know there. Yo’ papa and yo’ mama and nobody else can’t tell yuh and show yuh. Two things everybody’s got tuh do fuh theyselves. They got tuh go tuh God, and they got tuh find out about livin’ fuh theyselves.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 192</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Then Tea Cake came prancing around her where she was and the song of the sigh flew out of the window and lit in the top of the pine trees. Tea Cake, with the sun for a shawl. Of course he wasn’t dead. He could never be dead until she herself had finished feeling and thinking. The kiss of his memory made pictures of love and light against the wall. Here was peace. She pulled in her horizon like a great fish-net. Pulled it from around the waist of the world and draped it over her shoulder. So much of life in its meshes! She called in her soul to come and see.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 193</div></div>      </div>
      </div>
        <div class="footer">
    <div class="footer-data"><div class="footer-links"><ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/contact.php" title="">Contact</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/support.php" title="">Support</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/privacy.php" title="">Privacy</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/rights.php" title="">Rights</a></li></ul></div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="copyright">Copyright (c) 1999-2026 earthli.com. All Rights Reserved.</div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="versions">Powered by <ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore/app_news.php">earthli News 3.7</a></li><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore" title="">earthli WebCore&trade; 3.7</a></li></ul></div></div>    </div>
      </div>
  </div>  </body>
</html>
]]>
  </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
      <title type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[Project Hail Mary by Andy Weir (2021) (read in 2022)]]>
  </title>
    <id>https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=4415</id>
    <link href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=4415"/>
    <updated>2022-01-08T22:54:39+01:00</updated>
    <author>
        <name type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[Marco von Ballmoos]]>
  </name>
      <uri>https://earthli.com/users/marco</uri>
    </author>
      <summary type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<p><small class="notes">Standard disclaimer [1]</small></p>
<p>Andy Weir manages to comes up with consistently interesting science-fiction ideas and entertaining yarns (even if it&rsquo;s rather obvious in some places where he&rsquo;s almost writing a screenplay). I really wish he would find a co-author to help him smooth out some of the more YA... [<a class="complete-text-link" href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=4415">More</a>]</p>
]]>
  </summary>
      <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<html lang="en">
  <head>
    <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/themes/ice.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/fonts/raleway.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/core/medium.css">
  </head>
  <body>
<div class="style-controls">  <div class="page">
    <div class="page-body">
<div class="info-box-top">
<p>
Published by <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_user.php?name=marco" title="Marco von Ballmoos" class="visible">marco</a> on <span class="date-time">8. Jan 2022 22:54:39 (GMT-5)</span>
</p>
<p>
Updated by <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_user.php?name=marco" title="Marco von Ballmoos" class="visible">marco</a> on <span class="date-time">18. Nov 2025 18:57:05 (GMT-5)</span>
</p>
</div>
      <div class="text-flow wide">
  <p><small class="notes">Standard disclaimer [1]</small></p>
<p>Andy Weir manages to comes up with consistently interesting science-fiction ideas and entertaining yarns (even if it&rsquo;s rather obvious in some places where he&rsquo;s almost writing a screenplay). I really wish he would find a co-author to help him smooth out some of the more YA aspects of his writing. Still, this was a fun book to read—after the first third.</p>
<p>As with <em>The Martian</em>, it took me about that long to either get used to the writing style or for Weir to settle in and write more reasonably. I do feel that the overuse of inner monologue when Grace first woke up at the beginning of the book was something I didn&rsquo;t imagine. It was quite jarring and seemed a very forced way of introducing the character and background for the rest of the story. It got the job done, but I nearly gave up [2], which would have been a shame—because there are some intriguing concepts and ideas in the rest of the book.</p>
<p>This is not the hardest of hardcore science-fiction. There&rsquo;s a lot of science in it, and a lot of engineering as well (Weir mentions all of the people he consulted), but he also elides a bunch of stuff in the &ldquo;squishy sciences&rdquo; to get to where he wants to go. That&rsquo;s OK! Focus on what you&rsquo;re interested in and make a rollicking tale! Still, it <em>doesn&rsquo;t matter</em>. It&rsquo;s a story. Lay back and enjoy the ride. I don&rsquo;t think it&rsquo;s in the same class as <em>The Expanse</em>, but neither does it get over-wordy like that series. It moves relatively quickly.</p>
<p>So, on to the plot. Ryland Grace wakes up in a hospital bed. He spends a bunch of time not remembering that he&rsquo;s been shot into space on a suicide mission to find out why something that&rsquo;s killing our sun isn&rsquo;t killing Tau Ceti, a sun 13 light-years (LY) away. He&rsquo;s to figure that out, send back information on little drones—another 13LY journey—and then die of starvation—or whatever—knowing that he&rsquo;d helped possibly save mankind.</p>
<p>There are two interwoven threads of narration. Instead of just switching back and forth, though, the conceit is that Grace is slowly regaining his memories after having been in a medically-induced coma for nearly four years on the flight out to Tau Ceti. One thread is him, alone in a spaceship, in the Tau Ceti system. The other is the thread in the past that details how he came to be there and why.</p>
<p>It all starts when the sun dims, at an alarming rate. Ryland Grace is a somewhat-disgraced exobiologist who&rsquo;s moved on from a promising career that he torpedoed. He now teaches junior-high science to a roomful of adoring children (of course they&rsquo;re adoring). He&rsquo;s corralled into a top-secret project by a woman named Stratt, who has near-God-like powers granted by an unanimous vote of the U.N. As I wrote in my notes below: this is the most laughably unbelievable part of the book.</p>
<p>Grace investigates the contents of a probe that had been sent into the anomaly near Venus (the &ldquo;Petrova Line&rdquo;, named after the Russian scientist who&rsquo;d discovered it)—all on his own—and discovers that the dimming is caused by microscopic alien creatures that can absorb a tremendous amount of radiation. They are, in effect, eating the output of the sun. Grace names them &ldquo;Astrophage&rdquo;.</p>
<p>The collect and store power and then ambulate by emitting photons. Because they have such a tremendous ability to store power <em>and</em> can emit it in a harvestable form, they are automatically the most powerful batteries mankind has ever known. Grace and Stratt&rsquo;s crew go about learning how to get them to replicate. They store completely inertly, luckily enough.</p>
<p>Mankind discovers that there are many other systems in the immediate vicinity that are suffering from the same dimming. Except for Tau Ceti. Something else is going on there. We have to find out what if we have any chance of saving Earth. That&rsquo;s the Project Hail Mary mission: send three super-capable astronauts in comas at a significant fraction of the speed of light to Tau Ceti to figure it out, send back the results, and die as heroes.</p>
<p>The world bends its efforts to making this happen. Astrophage can also be harnessed as rocket engines. Now Earth just needs enough energy to breed them. They pave the Sahara to get the energy they need. Meanwhile, the planet is cooling too quickly, so climate scientists need to do a 180º turnaround and start dropping Antarctica into the ocean to heat the planet back up. They&rsquo;re releasing methane, so hopefully the effects can be reversed in a decade after the planet is saved. </p>
<p>At the last moment before launch, both the primary and secondary scientist for the mission are blown to smithereens and Grace is the next best choice. He remembers demurring, being kidnapped, and then … waking up at Tau Ceti. He&rsquo;s not a hero. He&rsquo;s a coward who was afraid to go.</p>
<p>OK. Tau Ceti system. Grace discovers that he&rsquo;s along because Yáo and Ilyukhina (Илюхина) both died en route. They didn&rsquo;t survive their comas. Grace gets acquainted with the automated support system on his ship and with his surroundings as he slowly regains strength and figure out where he is and what he&rsquo;s doing there.</p>
<p>Before Grace can really look around, he discovers a large spaceship right next to his, just a couple of hundred meters away. It&rsquo;s piloted by Rocky. They become fast friends and quickly learn to communicate. Rocky&rsquo;s been there for much longer. He is the only surviving crew member of 23. The others all died of radiation poisoning. They didn&rsquo;t know about cosmic rays. Neither do they know about relativity. They are from 40 Eridani, another nearby star. They were there for the same reason as Grace: to find out what&rsquo;s killing their star.</p>
<p>The Eridanians are different: they are about the size of a dog, with five legs, like a spider. They are highly efficient. No eyes, only ears. They communicate in tones. They are incredible engineers, but have no computers. Their atmosphere is nearly pure ammonia at 29x the pressure of Earth. They make nearly everything out of Xenonite.</p>
<p>Rocky moves in to the Project Hail Mary and Rocky and Grace travel to the planet to which the Petrova Line in this system connects, a CO2-rich planet they call &ldquo;Adrian&rdquo; (because Rocky named it after his partner, back at Eridani 40). They scoop up a piece of the atmosphere and discover &ldquo;Taumoeba&rdquo;, which eats Astrophage, keeping it under control in this system.</p>
<p>The Taumoeba escapes into Project Hail Mary, eating all of its astrophage and crippling it. They figure out how to get back to Rocky&rsquo;s ship. Rocky tells Grace that he has more than enough fuel to give him to make the return journey instead of continuing his suicide mission. (The Eridians didn&rsquo;t know about relativity, remember, so they planned for a much longer journey.)</p>
<p>Once they have Taumoeba and isolate it, they begin to breed it so that it can survive in the target atmospheres of the planets in their respective systems (e.g. Venus in the Solar System). This is all very science-y and pleasing and moves along at a bit more of an appropriate pace than the first half of the book.</p>
<p>They tearfully part ways and begin their respective hero&rsquo;s journeys. Grace discovers that the Taumoeba has escaped <em>again</em>: this time, it not only evolutionally developed a resistance to Nitrogen, but also learned how to squeeze out through Xenonite. He solves the problem with plastic, but then realizes that Rocky must be dead in the water, as well. Grace gives up returning to Earth himself, sending his four drones with data and samples instead. He uses a sweep and search to find Rocky and rescues him.</p>
<p>Rocky moves back in and they navigate the Hail Mary back to Eridani 40, where they save the day and are welcomed as heroes. Grace lives on the high-gravity planet until the end of his days. He learns at one point that the Sun has resumed its original luminosity so that the drones he&rsquo;d sent must have worked. At this point, as an older man made even more frail by the high gravity, he declines to make a mission back to Earth.</p>
<p><hr></p>
<div class="footnote-reference"><span id="footnote_DRAFTABLE_ENTRY_4415_1_body" class="footnote-number">[1]</span> Disclaimer: these are notes I took while reading this book. They include citations I found interesting or enlightening or particularly well-written. In some cases, I&rsquo;ve pointed out which of these applies to which citation; in others, I have not. Any benefit you gain from reading these notes is purely incidental to the purpose they serve of reminding me of what I once read. Please see Wikipedia for a summary if I&rsquo;ve failed to provide one sufficient for your purposes. If my notes serve to trigger an interest in this book, then I&rsquo;m happy for you.</div><div class="footnote-reference"><span id="footnote_DRAFTABLE_ENTRY_4415_2_body" class="footnote-number">[2]</span> See the &ldquo;Citations&rdquo; section below for my reading notes, wherein I complain in more detail about what exactly bugged me about the style.</div><h2>Citations</h2><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;I take a deep breath and speak slowly. “Two times e to the two-i-pi.” “Incorrect. What’s the cube root of eight?” But I wasn’t incorrect. I just wanted to see how smart the computer was. Answer: not very.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 5</div></div><p>Jesus. That is just … bad.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The infrared glow is very faint. I was only able to detect it at all because I was using extremely sensitive detection equipment while searching for IR emissions from nebulae.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 10</div></div><p>From where? The Earth&rsquo;s surface? Or private time on James Webb?</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;But to be certain, I called in a favor from the Atacama observatory in Chile—in my opinion the best IR observatory in the world. They confirmed my findings.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 10</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;They’ve given me a certain amount of authority to get things done.”</p>
<p>&ldquo;“They? Who’s they?”</p>
<p>&ldquo;“Every member nation of the UN.”</p>
<p>&ldquo;“Wait, what? How did—”</p>
<p>&ldquo;“Unanimous secret vote. It’s complicated. I’d like to talk to you about a scientific paper you wrote.”&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 37</div></div><p>Funny that this is the most outlandish part of the whole book.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;[…] adjusted the focus and tried various intensities of backlighting. </p>
<p>&ldquo;“Samples are opaque…I can’t see inside, even at the highest available light setting….”</p>
<p>&ldquo;“Are they alive?” Stratt asked. I glared at her.</p>
<p>&ldquo;“I can’t just tell that at a glance. What do you expect to happen here?”</p>
<p>&ldquo;“I want you to find out if they’re alive. And if so, find out how they work.”</p>
<p>&ldquo;“That’s a tall order.”</p>
<p>&ldquo;“Why? Biologists worked out how bacteria works. Just do the same thing they did.”</p>
<p>&ldquo;“That took thousands of scientists two centuries to work out!”</p>
<p>&ldquo;“Well…do it faster than that.”&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 48</div></div><p>Just a taste of the joke-y spell-it-all-out flavor of the book. This is one of the better &ldquo;jokes&rdquo;. It feels like reading a Jack Reacher book.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;“Yes, I know that much, thank you.” She looked to the ceiling. “People always assumed our first contact with alien life—if any existed—would be little green men in UFOs. We never considered the idea of a simple, unintelligent species.”</p>
<p>&ldquo;“Yeah,” I said. “This isn’t Vulcans dropping by to say hi. This is…space algae.”</p>
<p>&ldquo;“An invasive species. Like cane toads in Australia.”</p>
<p>&ldquo;“Good analogy.” I nodded. “And the population is growing. Fast. The more of them there are, the more solar energy gets consumed.”&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 51</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;She looked away for a moment, then back through the window at me. “Astrophage is an alien microbe. What if it can infect humans? What if it’s deadly? What if hazmat suits and neoprene gloves aren’t enough protection?”</p>
<p>&ldquo;I gasped. “Wait a minute! Am I a guinea pig? I’m a guinea pig!”</p>
<p>&ldquo;“No, it’s not like that,” she said. I stared at her. She stared at me. I stared at her. </p>
<p>&ldquo;“Okay, it’s exactly like that,” she said.</p>
<p>&ldquo;“Dang it!” I said. “That’s just not cool!”&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 58</div></div><p>Another example. I am.not making this up. YA-level writing.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Still, the needle was tiny compared to the hulking 10-micron Astrophage—only about one two-thousandth the width.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 60</div></div><p>Two-thousandth? Did you just give up on writing that? &ldquo;Ah, they&rsquo;ll know what I mean.&rdquo;</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;So why am I the one out here? All I did was prove that my lifelong belief was wrong. I guess I’ll remember that part later. For now, I want to know what star that is. And why we built a ship to bring people here.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 62</div></div><p>This gimmick for interleaving flashbacks, as well as the penetrating internal dialogue.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;“Uh…open aperture to supply room.”</p>
<p>&ldquo;“Unsealing supply room,” says the computer.&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 62</div></div><p>It&rsquo;s called Storage on the diagram. I have a hard time believing this computer would get past that synonym hassle-free. It failed to do so in many other cases. (It would later be noted that it wasn&rsquo;t an AI in the traditional sense, but more of an expert system.)</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;I couldn’t see it when the panel was closed, things were that tight. I’m glad I didn’t try to pry it open. It would have been a pain in the butt.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 63</div></div><p>Really? Why the hell does he write like this? Are we shooting for a particular reading level here?</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;I jiggle it a bit before figuring out I have to rotate it. Once I rotate it 90 degrees it detaches and I set it aside. I poke my head into the room below and see a bunch of soft-sided white cubes. I guess that makes sense. Packing stuff in soft containers lets you cram more things into the room.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 63</div></div><p>Hates comma but loves loggorhea. We don&rsquo;t need this level of detail for opening a hatch. That&rsquo;s how you get to a 400-page book, but it&rsquo;s unnecessary and distracting. E.g. &ldquo;The hatch opens, revealing a crawlspace filled wall-to-wall with soft-sided white cubes.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Commander Yáo. He was our leader. I can see his face now. Young and striking, eyes full of determination. He understood the severity of the mission and the weight on his shoulders. He was ready for the task. He was stern but reasonable. And you knew—you just knew—he would give up his life in a second for the mission or his crew.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 63</div></div><p>Eye roll. This really works as character-description, I guess. But…c&rsquo;mon. This feels much more like the description of a character in a screenplay. All this for a character who would only feature in one or two minor flashbacks 250 pages later.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Olesya Ilyukhina. She was hilarious. She could have you laughing your butt off within thirty seconds of meeting you. She just had one of those infectious and jovial personalities. As serious as Yáo was, Ilyukhina was casual. They butted heads about it from time to time, but even Yáo couldn’t resist her charms. I remember when he finally broke down and laughed at one of her jokes. You can’t be a hundred percent serious forever.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 64</div></div><p>C&rsquo;MON! You&rsquo;re really killing me here, Andy.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The container holds multiple outfits for each crewmember. I eventually find the ones for me. They are exactly as I assumed they would be. Hail Mary mission patch with a U.S. flag underneath, a NASA logo on the right shoulder, and a name tag that says GRACE.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 64</div></div><p>This is the end of about two pages of this bullshit about unpacking a box. This is obvious filler. He&rsquo;d already unpacked two other uniforms and <em>described them in exactly the same way</em>. The three paragraphs differed only in the logo and the name tag.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;I should have shared all my findings with the rest of the science community, but I wanted to be sure. Peer review may have fallen by the wayside, but at least I could self-review. Better than nothing.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 82</div></div><p>Ah there it is. The libertarian Randian bullshit about the lone genius/hero/all-rounder gittin&rsquo; &lsquo;er done.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;I went to a photography store downtown (San Francisco has a lot of photography enthusiasts) […]&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 85</div></div><p>I wasn&rsquo;t going to question that. What is wrong with him? What is the point of mentioning this? I&rsquo;m reminded of my <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=2455">reading of Dan Brown&rsquo;s &ldquo;The Lost Symbol&rdquo;</a>, which I gave up on.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;A navy man came forward and gestured for me to follow him. I don’t think anyone spoke English, but I got the general idea.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 88</div></div><p>This is pretty ignorant. Many Chinese of the latest adult generation speak at least some English. A good number are perfectly fluent. It&rsquo;s hard to believe that they wouldn&rsquo;t have been put on this boat filled with foreigners.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Several had translators whispering in their ear during the process.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 89</div></div><p>That is not even conceivably realistic for a gathering of scientists. They all understand English perfectly.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;I felt something weird on my forehead when I woke up. I reached up and it was a Post-it note. Someone put a Post-it on my head while I slept. I pulled it off and read it: Clean clothes and toiletries in the duffel under your bunk. Show this note to any sailor when you’ve cleaned up: 请带我去甲板7的官员会议室 —Stratt “She is such a pain in my butt…” I mumbled.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 92</div></div><p>Not gonna lie. This part I  liked. It felt more natural than the &ldquo;tell, don&rsquo;t show&rdquo; style he&rsquo;d used before.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;“We have figured this out, yes,” said Dimitri. “With lasers. It was very illuminating experiment.”</p>
<p>&ldquo;“Was that a pun?”</p>
<p>&ldquo;“It was!”</p>
<p>&ldquo;“Good one!”</p>
<p>&ldquo;We both laughed. Stratt glared at us.&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 97</div></div><p>Also not terrible. I remember this from <em>The Martian</em>: the first third of that was painful too.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;This time it changes to “Petrovascope.” Beyond that, there’s just a black screen with an error message: PETROVASCOPE CANNOT BE USED WHILE SPIN DRIVE IS ACTIVE.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 103</div></div><p>This kind of feels like the plotting of a puzzle-based video game. It makes sense, but you can almost see the video-game levels writing themselves.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;No meetings. No distractions. Just experimentation and engineering. I’d forgotten how much fun it was to get immersed in a task.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 107</div></div><p>But wasn&rsquo;t that literally what he&rsquo;d been doing, just days before? He had one meeting so far. Also he hasn&rsquo;t mentioned his students at all.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;but scientific papers were my forte for a long time.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 110</div></div><p>Had been. C&rsquo;mon.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;After a few halting attempts, I manage to turn it on. It immediately spots the other ship and sounds an alarm. The shrill noise hurts my ears. “Whoa, whoa, whoa!” I say. I frantically scan the panel until I see a button labeled “Mute Proximity Alert.” I press it and the noise stops.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 122</div></div><p>This kind of stuff is so pedestrian. You really don&rsquo;t need to go into this level of detail.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The computer models for the Astrophage breeder weren’t lining up with the real-world performance&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 136</div></div><p>He&rsquo;s not only an exobiologist, but also a power-systems engineer. He&rsquo;s also a teacher. This is Tony Stark/John Gault syndrome.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;No, this is a no-brainer. I’ve got to at least have a conversation with them. If they have any information about Astrophage at all, no matter how minor, I have to talk to them. It’s a risk, yes, but this whole mission is a risk.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 154</div></div><p>Obviously! Weir is so obsessed with the one-man-show genius that he&rsquo;s unsure whether to even have his character talk to what is clearly an advanced race.</p>
<p>On the other hand, Weir gives little thought to how long it would take to communicate complex concepts. They got lucky that they&rsquo;re even remotely compatible.</p>
<p>This ain&rsquo;t Charles Yu, that&rsquo;s for sure. If it&rsquo;s not basic physics, then Weir doesn&rsquo;t cover it in detail. That&rsquo;s fine! Of course! But the contract to the level of detail Weir spends on the process with which Grace takes out a tool out of a drawer is jarring.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;But I don’t know what the human ship’s material is made of.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 155</div></div><p>Why not? No spectrometer?</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Their move is taking a long time and I’m getting bored.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 157</div></div><p>He&rsquo;s literally making the other side do all of the work of building the tunnel.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;They don’t even know what my atmospheric pressure is.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 165</div></div><p>Yes they do. You sent back a sample. In the box. You didn&rsquo;t decompress it, did you? Well, then the alien has a sample of your atmosphere.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;And notably, the sounds were in my range of hearing. Some of the notes were low, some of them high. But definitely audible. That alone is amazing when I think about it. He’s from a different planet, and totally different evolutionary line, but we ended up with compatible sound ranges.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 176</div></div><p>Maybe. Or maybe you&rsquo;re missing hypersonics.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;It’s been two days since I slept. There’s just always been something monumental going on. I can’t just stay up forever. I need to sleep.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 179</div></div><p>What, no meth in the future?</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;“Hold on, Ms. Stratt,” said Justice Spencer. “This is still a court of law, and you will remain for the duration of these proceedings!”</p>
<p>&ldquo;“No, I won’t,” said Stratt. The bailiff walked forward. “Ma’am. I’ll have to restrain you if you don’t comply.”</p>
<p>&ldquo;“You and what army?” Stratt asked. Five armed men in military fatigues entered the courtroom and took up station around her.</p>
<p>&ldquo;“Because I have the U.S. Army,” she said. “And that’s a damn fine army.”&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 193</div></div><p>People get such boners for military coups. They love em. They&rsquo;re enamored with the idea of an infallible god flanked by incorrigible soldiers cutting through the bullshit of democracy. It&rsquo;s puerile, adolescent at best. It&rsquo;s <em>Atlas Shrugged</em>.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Oh thank God. I can’t imagine explaining “sleep” to someone who had never heard of it. Hey, I’m going to fall unconscious and hallucinate for a while. By the way, I spend a third of my time doing this. And if I can’t do it for a while, I go insane and eventually die. No need for concern.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 205</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;“The shelf will cleave at the line of explosions and slowly work its way into the sea and melt. Sea levels will rise about a centimeter over the next month, the ocean temperature will drop a degree—which is a disaster of its own but never mind that for now. Enormous quantities of methane will be released into the atmosphere. And now, methane is our friend. Methane is our best friend. And not just because it’ll keep us warm for a while.”</p>
<p>&ldquo;“Oh?”</p>
<p>&ldquo;“Methane breaks down in the atmosphere after ten years. We can knock chunks of Antarctica into the sea every few years to moderate the methane levels. And if Hail Mary finds a solution, we just have to wait ten years for the methane to go away. You can’t do that with carbon dioxide.”&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 242</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;I’ve gone from “sole-surviving space explorer” to “guy with wacky new roommate.” It’ll be interesting to see how this plays out.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 254</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Rocky’s data about Planet Adrian was dead-on. It’s 3.93 times Earth’s mass and has a radius of 10,318 kilometers (almost double Earth’s).&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 285</div></div><p>How does Rocky measure anything at astronomical distances if he doesn&rsquo;t know about radiation? How do long-range instruments work when you don&rsquo;t know what wavelengths are? How does Rocky&rsquo;s sensorium work? How can he hear anything Ryland is doing when their two environments are separate?</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Just like that, with minimal complication, Rocky had made a life-support system for Adrian life-forms—a system that didn’t need to know the conditions to provide in advance. It just maintains the status quo. He really is a genius. I wonder if all Eridians are like that, or if he’s special.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 310</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The Hail Mary was complete. Over 2 million kilograms of spacecraft and fuel in a nice, stable orbit—four times the mass of the International Space Station, and put together in one-twentieth the time. The press used to keep track of the total cost, but around the $10 trillion mark, they gave up. It just didn’t matter. It wasn’t about efficient use of resources anymore. It was Earth versus Astrophage, and no price was too high.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 351</div></div><p>I watched <em>Don&rsquo;t Look Up</em> while I was reading this book. That scenario seemed much more plausible than the one outlined above, unfortunately.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Rocky admonished me for leaving the sample at (human) room temperature for so long. He had a lot to say on that subject, actually. We had to add “reckless,” “idiot,” “foolish,” and “irresponsible” to our shared vocabulary just so he could fully express his opinion on the matter.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 356</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Eridian electronics isn’t nearly so advanced as Earth’s. They haven’t invented the transistor yet, let alone IC chips. Working with Rocky is like having the world’s best engineer from 1950 on the ship with me. Seems odd that a species could invent interstellar travel before inventing the transistor, but hey, Earth invented nuclear power, television, and even did several space launches before the transistor.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 377</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;We need to raise a strong, solid generation of survivors. Right now we’re soft. You, me, the whole Western world. We’re the result of growing up in unprecedented comfort and stability. It’s the kids of today that’ll have to make the world of tomorrow work. And they’re going to inherit a mess. I can really do a lot more by preparing kids for the world that’s to come. I should stay here on Earth where I’m needed.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 391</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;“Hey. What’s is your ship’s name, anyway?”</p>
<p>&ldquo;“Blip-A.”</p>
<p>&ldquo;“No, I mean, what do you call it?”</p>
<p>&ldquo;“Ship.”</p>
<p>&ldquo;“Your ship has no name?”</p>
<p>&ldquo;“Why would ship have name, question?”</p>
<p>&ldquo;I shrugged. “Ships have names.”</p>
<p>&ldquo;He points to my pilot’s seat. “What is name of you chair, question?”</p>
<p>&ldquo;“It doesn’t have a name.”</p>
<p>&ldquo;“Why does ship have name but chair no have name, question?”</p>
<p>&ldquo;“Never mind. Your ship is the Blip-A.”</p>
<p>&ldquo;“That is what I said. […]”&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 407</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;They have a copy of Wikipedia now. They’d work out what we’re up to when they saw the flashes.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 433</div></div><p>Skipping lots of encoding steps there. Like, a ton of them, on both the encoding and linguistic level.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Figuring out where to put the mini-farm was another matter. Even with its small size, it’s too big to fit inside the little probe. So I epoxy it to the undercarriage. Then I spot-weld a small counterweight to the top of the beetle. The computer inside has very strong opinions about where the center of mass of the probe is. It’s easier to add a counterweight than completely reprogram a guidance system.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 436</div></div><p>Elegant.</p>
      </div>
      </div>
        <div class="footer">
    <div class="footer-data"><div class="footer-links"><ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/contact.php" title="">Contact</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/support.php" title="">Support</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/privacy.php" title="">Privacy</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/rights.php" title="">Rights</a></li></ul></div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="copyright">Copyright (c) 1999-2026 earthli.com. All Rights Reserved.</div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="versions">Powered by <ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore/app_news.php">earthli News 3.7</a></li><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore" title="">earthli WebCore&trade; 3.7</a></li></ul></div></div>    </div>
      </div>
  </div>  </body>
</html>
]]>
  </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
      <title type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[The Churn by James S.A. Corey (2014) (read in 2021)]]>
  </title>
    <id>https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=4271</id>
    <link href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=4271"/>
    <updated>2022-01-03T08:21:21+01:00</updated>
    <author>
        <name type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[Marco von Ballmoos]]>
  </name>
      <uri>https://earthli.com/users/marco</uri>
    </author>
      <summary type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<p><small class="notes">Standard disclaimer [1]</small></p>
<p>This is one of the earliest stories in the entire Expanse universe. It takes place before even Leviathan Wakes. This is Amos Burton&rsquo;s origin story. It tells the story of how he started as a young thug named Timmy, in the employ of Baltimore crime lord Amos Burton. He ends up... [<a class="complete-text-link" href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=4271">More</a>]</p>
]]>
  </summary>
      <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<html lang="en">
  <head>
    <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/themes/ice.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/fonts/raleway.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/core/medium.css">
  </head>
  <body>
<div class="style-controls">  <div class="page">
    <div class="page-body">
<div class="info-box-top">
<p>
Published by <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_user.php?name=marco" title="Marco von Ballmoos" class="visible">marco</a> on <span class="date-time">3. Jan 2022 08:21:21 (GMT-5)</span>
</p>
<p>
Updated by <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_user.php?name=marco" title="Marco von Ballmoos" class="visible">marco</a> on <span class="date-time">27. Jan 2022 23:34:02 (GMT-5)</span>
</p>
</div>
      <div class="text-flow wide">
  <p><small class="notes">Standard disclaimer [1]</small></p>
<p>This is one of the earliest stories in the entire Expanse universe. It takes place before even Leviathan Wakes. This is Amos Burton&rsquo;s origin story. It tells the story of how he started as a young thug named Timmy, in the employ of Baltimore crime lord Amos Burton. He ends up running protection for an identity-grifter named Erich who works for Burton. Timmy lives with Lydia, an older woman who rescued him after his mother had died. She also had worked for Amos Burton, as a prostitute. Their relationship is complicated: he protects her, but is also her lover. Timmy&rsquo;s gift for violence is prodigious. He is taciturn to a fault. This impresses Burton.</p>
<p>On an assignment to protect Erich while he&rsquo;s on a job, all hell breaks loose. The entire neighborhood is raided by the police/authorities and he, Lydia, and Erich are forced to flee the area and, likely, Burton&rsquo;s ambit. Timmy had an island prepared where he spirits them away. He even manages to get Erich an identity-building kit. After Timmy has decapitated the organization by killing Burton, Erich uses the kit to rebuild the Amos Burton identity for Timmy, allowing him to escape off of Earth—but he can never return to Baltimore.</p>
<p><hr></p>
<div class="footnote-reference"><span id="footnote_DRAFTABLE_ENTRY_4271_1_body" class="footnote-number">[1]</span> Disclaimer: these are notes I took while reading this book. They include citations I found interesting or enlightening or particularly well-written. In some cases, I&rsquo;ve pointed out which of these applies to which citation; in others, I have not. Any benefit you gain from reading these notes is purely incidental to the purpose they serve of reminding me of what I once read. Please see Wikipedia for a summary if I&rsquo;ve failed to provide one sufficient for your purposes. If my notes serve to trigger an interest in this book, then I&rsquo;m happy for you.</div><h2>Citations</h2><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The number of people who knew him and loved him could be counted on one hand and leave most of the fingers spare, and when he was gone, the city went on without him as if he had never been.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 67</div></div>      </div>
      </div>
        <div class="footer">
    <div class="footer-data"><div class="footer-links"><ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/contact.php" title="">Contact</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/support.php" title="">Support</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/privacy.php" title="">Privacy</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/rights.php" title="">Rights</a></li></ul></div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="copyright">Copyright (c) 1999-2026 earthli.com. All Rights Reserved.</div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="versions">Powered by <ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore/app_news.php">earthli News 3.7</a></li><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore" title="">earthli WebCore&trade; 3.7</a></li></ul></div></div>    </div>
      </div>
  </div>  </body>
</html>
]]>
  </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
      <title type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[Leviathan Wakes by James S.A. Corey (2011) (read in 2021)]]>
  </title>
    <id>https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=4234</id>
    <link href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=4234"/>
    <updated>2022-01-02T22:29:46+01:00</updated>
    <author>
        <name type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[Marco von Ballmoos]]>
  </name>
      <uri>https://earthli.com/users/marco</uri>
    </author>
      <summary type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<p><small class="notes">Standard disclaimer [1]</small></p>
<p>This is the first book of the Expanse series. The crew of the ice-hauler <em>Canterbury</em> includes Earther XO Jim Holden, Belter Chief Engineer Naomi Nagata, Martian Navy pilot Alex Kamal, and Earther engineer Amos Burton. While they are on an excursion to investigate a distress call... [<a class="complete-text-link" href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=4234">More</a>]</p>
]]>
  </summary>
      <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<html lang="en">
  <head>
    <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/themes/ice.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/fonts/raleway.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/core/medium.css">
  </head>
  <body>
<div class="style-controls">  <div class="page">
    <div class="page-body">
<div class="info-box-top">
<p>
Published by <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_user.php?name=marco" title="Marco von Ballmoos" class="visible">marco</a> on <span class="date-time">2. Jan 2022 22:29:46 (GMT-5)</span>
</p>
<p>
Updated by <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_user.php?name=marco" title="Marco von Ballmoos" class="visible">marco</a> on <span class="date-time">27. Jan 2022 23:34:36 (GMT-5)</span>
</p>
</div>
      <div class="text-flow wide">
  <p><small class="notes">Standard disclaimer [1]</small></p>
<p>This is the first book of the Expanse series. The crew of the ice-hauler <em>Canterbury</em> includes Earther XO Jim Holden, Belter Chief Engineer Naomi Nagata, Martian Navy pilot Alex Kamal, and Earther engineer Amos Burton. While they are on an excursion to investigate a distress call from the ship <em>Scopuli</em>, a stealth ship appears and destroys the <em>Canterbury</em>. </p>
<p>Holden establishes his reputation by broadcasting his suspicions of it having been a Martian attack to the whole solar system. Fred Johnson of the OPA (Outer Planets Alliance) offers support. Joe Miller is an alcoholic detective working on Ceres, who&rsquo;s been tasked with finding Julie Mao, the rich scion of magnate Jules-Pierre Mao, owner of a sprawling empire.</p>
<p>Holden&rsquo;s message inspires the people of Ceres to riot so Miller quickly has his hands full with that. Holden meanwhile has docked with the <em>Donnager</em>, a giant Martian battleship. While there, the ship is attacked by a fleet of stealth ships that manage to do much more damage to it than they should have been able to. The crew of the <em>Donnager</em> sacrifice themselves to buy Holden and crew time to escape in the <em>Tachi</em>. They go to Tycho Station, where Johnson helps them refit and rename the ship to the <em>Rocinante</em>.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Holden knew all this, and his first sight of the station still took his breath away. It wasn’t just the size of it. It was the idea that four generations of the smartest people in the solar system had been living and working here as they helped drag humanity into the outer planets almost through sheer force of will.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 186</div></div><p>Johnson tasks them with a mission to Eros Station, where they are to hunt down and meet up with an OPA operative. They find the location, but it is infested with an alien disease called the Protomolecule. Miller, meanwhile, is sticking his nose where the powers-that-be think it doesn&rsquo;t belong, he&rsquo;s still on the trail of Julie Mao, even though no-one wants him to be. His dedication to a case no-one wants solved gets him fired (also his alcoholism doesn&rsquo;t help) and he also travels to Eros to hunt down a lead. He ends up in the same place as the crew of the <em>Rocinante</em>. Miller is a wonderful character: a flawed, noir detective with a lot of experience and bravado—and nothing to lose.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;He was lying his way past half a dozen men who were only letting him by because they were used to people being scared of them and he wasn’t.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 289</div></div><p>Together, they discover that Eros is actually infected with the same transformative Protomolecule. People have been trapped in rooms into which the virulent, alien disease is released. The crew is torn between trying to salvage something from the situation and just running for their lives. Miller and Holden bring up the rear and end up with severe radiation poisoning—but neither is infected with the Protomolecule. Eros is given up for lost, with millions dead or transformed into … something else. The station sings to itself, with the Protomolecule trying to figure out what to do with the biological material it&rsquo;s been provided.</p>
<p>Meanwhile, a war is brewing between the inner planets and the Belters. Even Earth and Mars&rsquo;s uneasy detente is in danger.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;It wasn’t out of control yet, but it was ramping up. Another few incidents and it wouldn’t matter how it had started. It wouldn’t matter what the stakes were. Mars knew the Belt couldn’t win, and the Belt knew it had nothing to lose. It was a recipe for death on a scale humanity had never seen.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 214</div></div><p>Once again underway, the <em>Roci</em> follows a lead provided by Fred Johnson to the <em>Anubis</em>, which had kidnapped the crew of the <em>Scopuli</em>. It has been abandoned on the the dark side of an asteroid. The entire ship&rsquo;s reactor room has been overrun by Protomolecule. From this ship, they find out the history of the virus.</p>
<p>They learn that a company called Protogen spearheaded the effort to develop, study, and possibly militarize the alien weapon, which was initially destined for Earth before it was captured by Saturn&rsquo;s gravity billions of years before. That is, the aliens that sent the Protomolecule had reached the level of advancement to develop it when the solar system was still cooling.</p>
<p>Fred Johnson, the Roci crew, and Miller learn that Eros is communicating with a secret facility on another asteroid, where they find the whole team of scientists from Protogen. They shut down the facility and Miller assassinates their leader Dresden.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;It was the logic of Protogen, of Dresden, of Thoth. Here is the problem, they said to themselves, and there is the solution. That it was drowned in innocent blood was as trivial as the font the reports were printed in. They had disconnected themselves from humanity. Shut off the cell clusters in their brains that made life besides their own sacred. Or valuable. Or worth saving. All it had cost them was every human connection.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 430</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;We found the protomolecule at exactly the right time for it to do the most damage to us, Holden thought. It had looked like a shortcut. A way to avoid having to do any of the work, to just jump straight to godhood. And it had been so long since anything was a real threat to humanity outside of itself that no one was even smart enough to be scared.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 517</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Dresden had said it himself: The things that had made the protomolecule, loaded it into Phoebe, and shot it at the Earth were already godlike back when humanity’s ancestors thought photosynthesis and the flagellum were cutting-edge. But he’d taken their ancient engine of destruction and turned the key anyway, because when you got right down to it, humans were still just curious monkeys. They still had to poke everything they found with a stick to see what it did.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 517</div></div><p>Now they need to shut down Eros before it causes more trouble. Fred Johnson reluctantly agrees to take the Mormon generation ship Nauvoo—under construction and nearly complete at Tycho Station—and crash it into Eros to destroy the asteroid. The Protomolecule <em>dodges</em> the attack, moving Eros in a way that completely defies known physics.</p>
<p>Miller leads a team that is there to deposit bombs on Eros. While the rest of the team gets off the asteroid, Miller takes a bomb deep into the asteroid, down, down, down to the innermost chamber, where he finds Julie Mao&rsquo;s remains, firmly embedded in the Protomolecule—but still alive. Eros is now headed for Earth, but Miller convinces Julie to steer Eros away from Earth. They crash Eros into Venus instead, where the Protomolecule begins constructing something vast, something with unknown purpose, beneath the sulphuric clouds.</p>
<p>This first book also provides a lot of the history and backstory of the solar system in the Expanse continuum. There is the natural difference between Belters, who have lived generations under conditions that are completely different than the &ldquo;Inners&rdquo; from Earth and Mars, civilizations that live with a biosphere and a gravity well.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Maybe no one who had lived with the certainty and support of a natural atmosphere would ever completely accept the power and fragility of a society based in doing what needed doing, in becoming fast and flexible, the way the OPA had. In becoming articulated. If Fred couldn’t build himself a peace treaty, the OPA would never win against the discipline and unity of an inner planet navy. But they would also never lose. War without end.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 471</div></div><p>Such tension can only end in extermination or capitulation, a long-term domination (as with the Native Americans). Confronted with the breathtaking majesty of something like the Protomolecule, humanity may need to reconsider its petty concerns, to direct its gaze outward, to fortify itself, and, perhaps, to once again try to improve itself.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;[…] without Earth, everything would eventually die. Humans had been out of the gravity well a long time. Long enough to have developed the technology to cut that umbilical cord, but they’d just never bothered to do it. Stagnant. Humanity, for all its desire to fling itself into every livable pocket it could reach, had become stagnant. Satisfied to fly around in ships built half a century before, using technology that hadn’t changed in longer than that.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 517</div></div><p><hr></p>
<div class="footnote-reference"><span id="footnote_DRAFTABLE_ENTRY_4234_1_body" class="footnote-number">[1]</span> Disclaimer: these are notes I took while reading this book. They include citations I found interesting or enlightening or particularly well-written. In some cases, I&rsquo;ve pointed out which of these applies to which citation; in others, I have not. Any benefit you gain from reading these notes is purely incidental to the purpose they serve of reminding me of what I once read. Please see Wikipedia for a summary if I&rsquo;ve failed to provide one sufficient for your purposes. If my notes serve to trigger an interest in this book, then I&rsquo;m happy for you.</div><h2>Citations</h2><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;“Yeah, well,” Miller said. “Say what you will about organized crime, at least it’s organized.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 26</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;“Okay,” Havelock said. “What the hell is the ‘forgotten arm’?”</p>
<p>&ldquo;“Boxing term,” Miller said. “It’s the hit you didn’t see coming.”&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 26</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;“I knew,” Havelock said. “When I took the Star Helix contract, I knew I’d have to work to fit in. I thought it’d be the same as anywhere, you know? You go, you get your chops busted for a while. Then, when they see you can take it, they treat you like one of the team. It’s not like that here.”</p>
<p>&ldquo;“It’s not,” Miller said.&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 48</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Miller led the way to a back table, nodding to the men and women he knew as he passed. While he’d been careful and diplomatic at the Blue Frog, he chose a bluff masculinity here. It was just as much a pose.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 49</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;“I’m not saying that,” Miller said, suspecting that it was exactly what he was saying. “It’s just that Belters don’t take the long view when you screw with basic resources. That water was future air, propellant mass, and potables for us. We have no sense of humor about that shit.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 67</div></div><p>That&rsquo;s not unique. It&rsquo;s just that inners are so comfortable, they never feel.that threatened for real. They are susceptible to manufactured crises.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;“This Holden guy didn’t say it was Mars. Just that they found a Martian battery. You think people are going to… declare war?” Havelock said. “Just on the basis of this one guy’s pictures of a battery?”</p>
<p>&ldquo;“The ones that wait to get the whole story aren’t our problem.”&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 68</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Miller slowed his team to a brisk walk. Arresting the murderer while surrounded by a crowd of his friends would be tough enough without being winded.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 72</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The inner planets look on us as their labor force. They tax us. They direct what we do. They enforce their laws and ignore ours in the name of stability. In the last year, they’ve doubled the tariffs to Titania. Five thousand people on an ice ball orbiting Neptune, months from anywhere. The sun’s just a bright star to them. Do you think they’re in a position to get redress? They’ve blocked any Belter freighters from taking Europa contracts. They charge us twice as much to dock at Ganymede. The science station on Phoebe? We aren’t even allowed to orbit it. There isn’t a Belter in the place. Whatever they do there, we won’t find out until they sell the technology back to us, ten years from now.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 112</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;“Well,” Miller said, “called that one wrong.”</p>
<p>&ldquo;“Which one?” Havelock said.</p>
<p>&ldquo;“OPA’s not moving in on the criminals,” Miller said. “They’re moving in on the cops.”&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 115</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Everyone looked at Shed. Without the vacuum, his blood was pouring out into a floating red sphere just above his neck, like a hideous cartoon replacement for his head.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 140</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;These people were what it was all about, Miller told himself. Normal people living small lives in a bubble of rock surrounded by hard vacuum. If they let the station turn into a riot zone, let order fail, all these lives would get turned into kibble like a kitten in a meat grinder. Making sure it didn’t happen was for people like him, Muss, even Shaddid.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 155</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;Holden got up off the floor and moved over to the computer console. A program Naomi had named Trans01 was waiting to be run. He hesitated for one second, then pressed the button to execute. The ship failed to vaporize. “I guess Fred wants us alive, then,” he said.</p>
<p>&ldquo;Naomi slumped down with a noisy, extended exhale. “See, this is why I can’t ever be in command,” she said.</p>
<p>&ldquo;“Don’t like making tough calls with incomplete information?”</p>
<p>&ldquo;“More I’m not suicidally irresponsible,” she replied, and began slowly reassembling the transponder housing.&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 184</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Holden knew all this, and his first sight of the station still took his breath away. It wasn’t just the size of it. It was the idea that four generations of the smartest people in the solar system had been living and working here as they helped drag humanity into the outer planets almost through sheer force of will.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 186</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;The beautiful thing about losing your illusions, he thought, was that you got to stop pretending. All the years he’d told himself that he was respected, that he was good at his job, that all his sacrifices had been made for a reason fell away and left him with the clear, unmuddied knowledge that he was a functional alcoholic who had pared away everything good in his own life to make room for anesthetic.</p>
<p>&ldquo;Shaddid thought he was a joke. Muss thought he was the price she paid not to sleep with someone she didn’t like. The only one who might have any respect for him at all was Havelock, an Earther. It was peaceful, in its way. He could stop making the effort to keep up appearances. If he stayed in bed listening to the alarm drone, he was just living up to expectations. No shame in that.&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 189</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Never knew if you had any luck left unless you pushed it. Besides, there wasn’t a lot to lose.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 192</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;[…] with all of the enemy’s citizens living at the bottom of huge gravity wells, we don’t even have to aim particularly well. Einstein was right. We will be fighting the next war with rocks. But the Belt has rocks that will turn the surface of Mars into a molten sea.</p>
<p>&ldquo;“Right now everyone is still playing nice, and only shooting at ships. Very gentlemanly. But sooner or later, one side or the other will be pressed to do something desperate.”&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 202</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;It wasn’t out of control yet, but it was ramping up. Another few incidents and it wouldn’t matter how it had started. It wouldn’t matter what the stakes were. Mars knew the Belt couldn’t win, and the Belt knew it had nothing to lose. It was a recipe for death on a scale humanity had never seen.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 214</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Miller thought of six different answers and turned them all aside. One of the others—a big man, solid, with a bare scalp—was pacing out the room, his eyes unfocused the same way Miller’s were. Of Holden’s four, that was the only guy who’d seen serious gunplay before.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 242</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;“Besides,” Miller said, “it’s a rad hazard. You don’t need air loss to kill everyone in the station. Just burn a few quadrillion spare neutrons through the place at C, and there won’t be any trouble with the oxygen supply.”</p>
<p>&ldquo;“Cheerful fucker,” Amos said.</p>
<p>&ldquo;“They build stations inside of rocks for a reason,” Naomi said. “Not so easy to force radiation through this many meters of rock.”&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 268</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Whatever this was, it had been going on a long time before the Canterbury had picked up a distress call from the Scopuli. A long time before Julie had vanished. And putting a bunch of Ceres Station thugs in charge of Eros crowd control using stolen Ceres Station equipment had been part of the plan. The third phase.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 270</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Miller could see it in the man’s eyes: the cunning, the shift, the move from one strategy to another. It was old and familiar and as predictable as water moving down.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 286</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;He was lying his way past half a dozen men who were only letting him by because they were used to people being scared of them and he wasn’t.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 289</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;His death-self was unfolding in him, and the dark blooming took no effort. It was a relief, a relaxation, a long, slow exhale after decades of holding it in.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 298</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;His voice sounded like it had been dragged down an alley by its ankles.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 316</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;“You’re both dead,” Naomi said. “Seriously, we had to override the triage filters on both of you more than once. The expert system kept clicking you over into hospice care and shooting you full of morphine.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 320</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;“People need to know what’s going on,” Holden said.</p>
<p>&ldquo;“Yes, they do, but maybe we should actually know what the hell is going on before we tell them,” Miller replied, all the weariness gone from his voice. “How gullible are you?”</p>
<p>&ldquo;“Hey,” Holden said, but Miller got louder. “You found a Martian battery, right? So you told everyone in the solar system about it and started the single largest war in human history. Only turns out the Martians maybe weren’t the ones that left it there. Then, a bunch of mystery ships kill the Donnager, which Mars blames on the Belt, only, dammit, the Belt didn’t even know it was capable of killing a Martian battle cruiser.”</p>
<p>&ldquo;Holden opened his mouth, but Miller grabbed a bulb of coffee Amos had left behind on the console and threw it at his head. “Let me finish! And now you find some data that implicates Earth. First thing you do is blab it to the universe, so that Mars and the Belt drag Earth into this thing, making the largest war of all time even bigger. Are you seeing a pattern here?”&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 332</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;“So what do you think’s going to happen?” Miller said. “This is how these people work! They made the Canterbury look like Mars. It wasn’t. They made the Donnager look like the Belt. It wasn’t. Now it looks like the whole damn thing’s Earth? Follow the pattern. It probably isn’t! You never, never put that kind of accusation out there until you know the score. You look. You listen. You’re quiet, fercrissakes, and when you know, then you can make your case.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 332</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;If everyone knows everything, nothing stays secret.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 333</div></div><p>That&rsquo;s not how information works. That&rsquo;s Like conspiracy theorists forwarding every idiocy they find and claiming they&rsquo;re helping.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;“Eventually, someone’ll figure out the big picture. This kind of thing requires secrecy to function, so exposing all the secrets hurts them in the end. It’s the only way this really, permanently stops.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 333</div></div><p>Eventually, maybe. Millions die while the truth settles.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;“The protomolecule first caught our interest for its ability to maintain its primary structure in a wide variety of conditions through secondary and tertiary changes. It also showed an affinity for carbon and silicon structures. Its activity suggested it was not in itself a living thing, but a set of free-floating instructions designed to adapt to and guide other replicating systems. Animal experiments suggest that its effects are not exclusive to simple replicators, but are, in fact, scalable.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 348</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;“People have a right to know what’s going on,” Holden said. “Your argument boils down to you not thinking people are smart enough to figure out the right way to use it.</p>
<p>&ldquo;“Has anyone used anything you’ve broadcast as something besides an excuse to shoot someone they already didn’t like? Giving them a new reason won’t stop them killing each other,” Miller said. “You started these wars, Captain. Doesn’t mean you can stop them. But you have to try.”</p>
<p>&ldquo;“And how am I supposed to do that?” Holden said. The distress in his voice could have been anger. It could have been prayer.&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 367</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Maybe that was why they were taxed to subsistence level. The bird was out of the cage, but you couldn’t let it stretch its wings too far or it might forget it belonged to you.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 377</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;It wasn’t what he would have expected. But maybe that was shortsighted. He was seeing the thing the way Shaddid and Protogen did. There were two sides fighting—that was true enough—but they weren’t the inner planets versus the Belters. They were the people who thought it was a good idea to kill people who looked or acted differently against the people who didn’t.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 386</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;“So,” Holden said. “You figure out how the bug works, and then what?”</p>
<p>&ldquo;“Then everything. Belters who can work outside a ship without wearing a suit. Humans capable of sleeping for hundreds of years at a time flying colony ships to the stars. No longer being bound to the millions of years of evolution inside one atmosphere of pressure at one g, slaves to oxygen and water. We decide what we want to be, and we reprogram ourselves to be that. That’s what the protomolecule gives us.”&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 423</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;It was the logic of Protogen, of Dresden, of Thoth. Here is the problem, they said to themselves, and there is the solution. That it was drowned in innocent blood was as trivial as the font the reports were printed in. They had disconnected themselves from humanity. Shut off the cell clusters in their brains that made life besides their own sacred. Or valuable. Or worth saving. All it had cost them was every human connection.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 430</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;He wondered how many people he’d known who had taken that path. Cops had a tradition of eating their guns that went back to long before humanity had lifted itself up the gravity well. Here he was, without a home, without a friend, with more blood on his hands from the past month than from his whole career before it. The in-house shrink on Ceres called it suicidal ideation in his yearly presentation to the security teams.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 447</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Diogo and the other OPA irregulars had breached a high-value research station, faced down one of the most powerful and evil corporations in a history of power and evil. And now they were making music from the screams of the dying. Of the dead. They were dancing to it in the low-rent clubs. What it must be like, Miller thought, to be young and soulless. But no. That wasn’t fair. Diogo was a good kid. He was just naive. The universe would take care of that, given a little time.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 449</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Maybe no one who had lived with the certainty and support of a natural atmosphere would ever completely accept the power and fragility of a society based in doing what needed doing, in becoming fast and flexible, the way the OPA had. In becoming articulated. If Fred couldn’t build himself a peace treaty, the OPA would never win against the discipline and unity of an inner planet navy. But they would also never lose. War without end.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 471</div></div><p>It can only end in extermination or capitulation long-term domination (as with the Native Americans).</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;Keeping his voice neutral and professional, he said, “Naomi, can you pass the pepper?”</p>
<p>&ldquo;Amos’ head snapped up, and he dropped his fork on the table with a loud clatter. “Holy shit, you guys are doing it!”</p>
<p>&ldquo;“Um,” Holden said. “What?”</p>
<p>&ldquo;“Something’s been screwy ever since we got back on the Roci, but I couldn’t figure. But that’s it! You guys are finally playing hide the weasel.”</p>
<p>&ldquo;Holden blinked twice at the big mechanic, unsure of what to say. He glanced at Naomi for support, but her head was down, and her hair completely covered her face. Her shoulders were shaking in silent laughter.</p>
<p>&ldquo;“Jesus, Cap,” Amos said, a grin on his wide face. “It fucking took you long enough. If she’d been throwing herself at me like that, I’d have been neck deep in that shit.”&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 477</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;And still, maybe there was something like a plan. Maybe the universe had put him in the right place at the right time to do the thing that no one else would do. Maybe all the pain and suffering he’d been through, all the disappointments and soul-crushing years wallowing through the worst that humanity had to offer up, had been meant to bring him here, to this moment, when he was ready to die if it bought humanity a little time. It would be pretty to think so, Julie said in his mind. “It would,” he agreed with a sigh. At the sound of his voice, the vision of her vanished, just another daydream.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 505</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;“I’m sorry about before,” Naomi said.</p>
<p>&ldquo;“It was a bad situation. We did what we had to do. Same as always.”</p>
<p>&ldquo;“Same as always,” she echoed. They didn’t speak for a few seconds.</p>
<p>&ldquo;“Thanks for the trigger,” Miller said. “Tell Amos I appreciate it.” He cut the connection before she could answer. Long goodbyes weren’t anyone’s strong suit.&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 509</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;He ran the hand terminal connection through the suit, calling Holden for what he expected was the last time.</p>
<p>&ldquo;“Miller,” Holden said almost immediately.</p>
<p>&ldquo;“I’m heading in now,” he said.</p>
<p>&ldquo;“Wait. Look, there’s a way we might be able to get an automated cart. If the Roci—”</p>
<p>&ldquo;“Yeah, but you know how it is. I’m already here. And we don’t know how fast this sonofabitch can go. We’ve got a problem we need to fix. This is how we do it.”</p>
<p>&ldquo;Holden’s hope had been weak, anyway. Pro forma. A gesture and, Miller thought, maybe even heartfelt. Trying to save everyone, right to the last.&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 509</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Miller was lugging a fusion bomb through Eros right now. When your enemy had the tech advantage, you came at him as low-tech as you could get. Maybe one sad detective pulling a nuclear weapon on a wagon would slip through their defenses. Naomi had said they weren’t magic. Maybe Miller could make it and give them the opening they needed.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 512</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;[…] without Earth, everything would eventually die. Humans had been out of the gravity well a long time. Long enough to have developed the technology to cut that umbilical cord, but they’d just never bothered to do it. Stagnant. Humanity, for all its desire to fling itself into every livable pocket it could reach, had become stagnant. Satisfied to fly around in ships built half a century before, using technology that hadn’t changed in longer than that.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 517</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Earth had been so focused on her own problems that she’d ignored her far-flung children, except when asking for her share of their labors. Mars had bent her entire population to the task of remaking the planet, changing its red face to green. Trying to make a new Earth to end their reliance on the old. And the Belt had become the slums of the solar system. Everyone too busy trying to survive to spend any time creating something new. We found the protomolecule at exactly the right time for it to do the most damage to us, Holden thought. It had looked like a shortcut. A way to avoid having to do any of the work, to just jump straight to godhood. And it had been so long since anything was a real threat to humanity outside of itself that no one was even smart enough to be scared.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 517</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Dresden had said it himself: The things that had made the protomolecule, loaded it into Phoebe, and shot it at the Earth were already godlike back when humanity’s ancestors thought photosynthesis and the flagellum were cutting-edge. But he’d taken their ancient engine of destruction and turned the key anyway, because when you got right down to it, humans were still just curious monkeys. They still had to poke everything they found with a stick to see what it did.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 517</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;A flock of softball-sized spiderlike things crawled through the corridor, leaving a slick sheen of glowing slime behind them. It wasn’t until he paused to knock one off the cart that he recognized them as severed hands, the trailing wrist bones charred black and remade. Part of his mind was screaming, but it was a distant one and easy to ignore.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 527</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Back in the ancient days, when humanity still lived entirely down a well, the paths laid down by Roman legions had become asphalt and later ferroconcrete without ever changing a curve or a turn. On Ceres, Eros, Tycho, the bore of the standard corridor had been determined by mining tools built to accommodate the trucks and lifts of Earth, which had in turn been designed to go down tracks wide enough for a mule cart’s axle.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 527</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;[…] had kept the information and languages and complex cognitive structures, building itself on them like asphalt over the roads the legions built.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 530</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;She was in a hazmat analysis node, lying on a bed of the dark thread that spilled out from her spine until it was indistinguishable from a massive fairy-tale cushion of her own flowing hair. Tiny points of blue light glittered on her face, her arms, her breasts. The bone spurs that had been pressing out of her skin had grown into sweeping, almost architectural connections with the lushness around her. Her legs were gone, lost in the tangle of dark alien webs; she reminded Miller of a mermaid who had traded her fins for a space station. Her eyes were closed, but he could see them shifting and dancing under the lids. And she was breathing.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 547</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;And for a moment, he was tempted. In that hesitation between drawing breath and speaking, part of him wondered what would happen if he shed the patterns of history and spoke about himself as a man, about the Joe Miller who he’d known briefly, about the responsibility they all shared to tear down the images they held of one another and find the genuine, flawed, conflicted people they actually were. It would have been a noble way to fail.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 566</div></div><p>The following is from the afterword,</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;This is working man’s science fiction. It’s like in Alien, we meet the crew of the Nostromo doing their jobs in this very blue-collar environment. They’re truckers, right? Why is there a room in the Nostromo where water leaks down off of chains suspended from the ceiling? Because it looks cool and makes the world feel a little messy. It gives you the feel of the world. Ridley Scott doesn’t explain why that room exists, and when most people watch the film, it never even occurs to them to ask. What kind of drive does the Nostromo use? I bet no one walked out of the film asking that question.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 568</div></div>      </div>
      </div>
        <div class="footer">
    <div class="footer-data"><div class="footer-links"><ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/contact.php" title="">Contact</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/support.php" title="">Support</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/privacy.php" title="">Privacy</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/rights.php" title="">Rights</a></li></ul></div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="copyright">Copyright (c) 1999-2026 earthli.com. All Rights Reserved.</div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="versions">Powered by <ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore/app_news.php">earthli News 3.7</a></li><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore" title="">earthli WebCore&trade; 3.7</a></li></ul></div></div>    </div>
      </div>
  </div>  </body>
</html>
]]>
  </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
      <title type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[The Butcher of Anderson Station by James S.A. Corey (2011) (read in 2021)]]>
  </title>
    <id>https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=4270</id>
    <link href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=4270"/>
    <updated>2022-01-02T17:58:58+01:00</updated>
    <author>
        <name type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[Marco von Ballmoos]]>
  </name>
      <uri>https://earthli.com/users/marco</uri>
    </author>
      <summary type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<p><small class="notes">Standard disclaimer [1]</small></p>
<p>This is one of the earliest stories in the entire Expanse universe. It takes place before even <em>Leviathan Wakes</em>. This is Fred Johnson&rsquo;s origin story. It tells the story of how he started as an Earth marine and how he came to be known as the eponymous butcher.</p>
<p>The present-day... [<a class="complete-text-link" href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=4270">More</a>]</p>
]]>
  </summary>
      <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<html lang="en">
  <head>
    <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/themes/ice.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/fonts/raleway.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/core/medium.css">
  </head>
  <body>
<div class="style-controls">  <div class="page">
    <div class="page-body">
<div class="info-box-top">
<p>
Published by <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_user.php?name=marco" title="Marco von Ballmoos" class="visible">marco</a> on <span class="date-time">2. Jan 2022 17:58:58 (GMT-5)</span>
</p>
<p>
Updated by <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_user.php?name=marco" title="Marco von Ballmoos" class="visible">marco</a> on <span class="date-time">27. Jan 2022 23:35:07 (GMT-5)</span>
</p>
</div>
      <div class="text-flow wide">
  <p><small class="notes">Standard disclaimer [1]</small></p>
<p>This is one of the earliest stories in the entire Expanse universe. It takes place before even <em>Leviathan Wakes</em>. This is Fred Johnson&rsquo;s origin story. It tells the story of how he started as an Earth marine and how he came to be known as the eponymous butcher.</p>
<p>The present-day Fred Johnson has been taken captive by Anderson Dawes, then-leader of the OPA. But Fred Johnson hasn&rsquo;t been captured because he&rsquo;s a danger to the OPA. Quite the contrary: Johnson has become a drunk and is considering ending it all. He regrets his role in the attack that made him famous throughout the system. Anderson Dawes sees this regret as a thin wedge that he can use to convert one of Earth&rsquo;s greatest assets to work for the Belters. The rest, as they say, is history.</p>
<p><hr></p>
<div class="footnote-reference"><span id="footnote_DRAFTABLE_ENTRY_4270_1_body" class="footnote-number">[1]</span> Disclaimer: these are notes I took while reading this book. They include citations I found interesting or enlightening or particularly well-written. In some cases, I&rsquo;ve pointed out which of these applies to which citation; in others, I have not. Any benefit you gain from reading these notes is purely incidental to the purpose they serve of reminding me of what I once read. Please see Wikipedia for a summary if I&rsquo;ve failed to provide one sufficient for your purposes. If my notes serve to trigger an interest in this book, then I&rsquo;m happy for you.</div><h2>Citations</h2><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;“The problem with you,” Dawes said, his voice calm and conversational as if they were sitting in a bar somewhere sharing a beer, “and I don’t mean this as a criticism of you in particular. It’s true of anybody who didn’t grow up in the Belt. The problem with you is that you are wasteful.”</p>
<p>&ldquo;“I’m not a fucking coward,” Fred said through his rapidly swelling lip.</p>
<p>&ldquo;“Of course you are. You’re smart, you’re healthy. Maybe a few hundred people out of forty billion have your combination of talent and training. And you’re trying to waste that very valuable resource. You’re like the guy who delays replacing his airlock seals when they start to leak. You think it’s just a little bit. It doesn’t matter. You’re one guy. You get killed, no big loss.”&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 20</div></div>      </div>
      </div>
        <div class="footer">
    <div class="footer-data"><div class="footer-links"><ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/contact.php" title="">Contact</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/support.php" title="">Support</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/privacy.php" title="">Privacy</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/rights.php" title="">Rights</a></li></ul></div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="copyright">Copyright (c) 1999-2026 earthli.com. All Rights Reserved.</div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="versions">Powered by <ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore/app_news.php">earthli News 3.7</a></li><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore" title="">earthli WebCore&trade; 3.7</a></li></ul></div></div>    </div>
      </div>
  </div>  </body>
</html>
]]>
  </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
      <title type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[White Noise by Don DeLillo (1985) (read in 2021)]]>
  </title>
    <id>https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=4383</id>
    <link href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=4383"/>
    <updated>2021-12-26T00:06:04+01:00</updated>
    <author>
        <name type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[Marco von Ballmoos]]>
  </name>
      <uri>https://earthli.com/users/marco</uri>
    </author>
      <summary type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<p><small class="notes">Standard disclaimer [1]</small></p>
<p>This novel felt a bit like others I&rsquo;ve read about tenured professors in America, like Roth&rsquo;s <em>The Dying Animal</em>. It&rsquo;s not got much of a plot to speak of. Instead, it&rsquo;s more a set of character studies of Jack Gladney and his odd family: Babette (his third wife, I believe) and a... [<a class="complete-text-link" href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=4383">More</a>]</p>
]]>
  </summary>
      <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<html lang="en">
  <head>
    <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/themes/ice.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/fonts/raleway.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/core/medium.css">
  </head>
  <body>
<div class="style-controls">  <div class="page">
    <div class="page-body">
<div class="info-box-top">
<p>
Published by <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_user.php?name=marco" title="Marco von Ballmoos" class="visible">marco</a> on <span class="date-time">26. Dec 2021 00:06:04 (GMT-5)</span>
</p>
<p>
Updated by <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_user.php?name=marco" title="Marco von Ballmoos" class="visible">marco</a> on <span class="date-time">27. Jan 2022 23:35:37 (GMT-5)</span>
</p>
</div>
      <div class="text-flow wide">
  <p><small class="notes">Standard disclaimer [1]</small></p>
<p>This novel felt a bit like others I&rsquo;ve read about tenured professors in America, like Roth&rsquo;s <em>The Dying Animal</em>. It&rsquo;s not got much of a plot to speak of. Instead, it&rsquo;s more a set of character studies of Jack Gladney and his odd family: Babette (his third wife, I believe) and a mix of his and her children, Heinrich, Denise, Steffie, and Wilder. There are other children and their mothers (Jack&rsquo;s exes) scattered around the country, who make rare appearances. Jack teaches Hitler Studies at a local university. His closest friend there is fellow professor Murray Siskind, whose kind of an intellectual freelancer, teaching various subjects. If anyone were to make a movie of this book, it should be Wes Anderson. [2]</p>
<p>Especially the character of Heinrich seems quite the type,</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;[…] I saw Heinrich crouched on a small ledge outside our attic window. He wore his camouflage jacket and cap, an outfit with complex meaning for him, at fourteen, struggling to grow and to escape notice simultaneously, his secrets known to us all. He looked east through binoculars.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 107</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;People listened attentively to this adolescent boy in a field jacket and cap, with binoculars strapped around his neck and an Instamatic fastened to his belt.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 126</div></div><p>Tell me that doesn&rsquo;t sound like the adolescent character in one or more Wes Anderson movies.</p>
<p>The rough arc of the plot starts with establishing Jack and his extended family. Jack teaches Hitler studies, but doesn&rsquo;t speak German. He endeavors to learn the language passably well enough that he looks less the fool at the next Hitler convention at his university.</p>
<p>The plot moves forward a bit when Jack and his family—and their whole town—are exposed to a &ldquo;Toxic Airborne Incident&rdquo; that forces them all to evacuate from town and hole up in emergency shelters. They are moved from there as well as the toxic cloud (Nyodene Derivative) makes a zig when it had been expected to zag. Here, Jack makes the acquaintance of a man working for SIMUVAC, which is an organization that simulates evacuations.</p>
<p>In the second part, Jack finds out that Babette has been taking a drug called Dylar, but she claims she isn&rsquo;t taking it. Denise pushes Jack to find out more. This is one way of looking at the story. The other is that Babette is cheating on Jack and the Dylar is just a cover story. Jack chooses to believe the story of Dylar, the wonder drug that cures you of the fear of death.</p>
<p>This is something that Jack incidentally needs more than Babette because someone from SIMUVAC told him that his exposure to Nyodene has given him only decades left to live. This bothers him greatly and he would love to medicate away his terror at his impending doom. That being terrified of a death decades in the future is facially ludicrous is left up to the reader to determine.</p>
<p>When Babette eventually confesses that the drug didn&rsquo;t help her at all, it&rsquo;s all the more obvious that she was just cheating on Jack twice a week for months, but Jack doubles down on his belief in Dylar&rsquo;s efficacy.</p>
<p>Murray, the genius, suggests to Jack that perhaps taking another life would help him conquer his own fear of death. Jack takes his trusty pistol and drives around, looking for Mr. Gray, Babette&rsquo;s lover. He shoots Gray twice, places the pistol in his hand to make it look like a suicide, is shot by Gray with the final bullet, takes Gray to a bizarre hospital, and returns home, probably no wiser.</p>
<p>The SIMUVAC and the Dylar both indicate that some things are real and others are not, but this book doesn&rsquo;t go as strongly in the direction of living a possibly unreal lifetime as something like Dick&rsquo;s <em>The Three Stigmata of Palmer Eldritch</em> or Lem&rsquo;s <em>The Futurological Congress</em>. Instead, it kind of suggests that maybe what Gladney experiences isn&rsquo;t entirely as real as he thinks it is, but that the fears he has are no less real for all that.</p>
<p>The entire book is suffused with American culture, both real and imagined. I wonder how popular is could possibly be outside of America, to be honest. On the other hand, quotes like the following—which would have fit almost uniquely to the U.S. in 1985—are now applicable to many places in the heavily Americanized west, so maybe Europeans can relate to the material now in a way that they couldn&rsquo;t when the book first appeared.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;It seemed to me that Babette and I, in the mass and variety of our purchases, in the sheer plenitude those crowded bags suggested, the weight and size and number, the familiar package designs and vivid lettering, the giant sizes, the family bargain packs with Day-Glo sale stickers, in the sense of replenishment we felt, the sense of well-being, the security and contentment these products brought to some snug home in our souls—it seemed we had achieved a fullness of being that is not known to people who need less, expect less, who plan their lives around lonely walks in the evening.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 20</div></div><p>There are many places where the self-assuredness, the invincibility, of the well-off middle-class has also become more commonplace. For example, Babette&rsquo;s blasé dismissal of any safety precautions when she says,</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;“They’re always saying boil your water,” Babette said. “It’s the new thing, like turn your wheel in the direction of the skid.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 34</div></div><p>Both of these things are important, but she seems to be in some sort of information overload that doesn&rsquo;t allow her to process them as important to her life. Perhaps this is predicated on the fact that she is able to ignore societal admonitions <em>and nothing bad ever happens</em>. Or perhaps it&rsquo;s due to a hyperactive media making so much clamor that she can&rsquo;t tell the signal from the noise, so that everything is a wash of indiscernible <em>white noise</em>?</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;“That’s the point,” she said. “Every day on the news there’s another toxic spill. Cancerous solvents from storage tanks, arsenic from smokestacks, radioactive water from power plants. How serious can it be if it happens all the time? Isn’t the definition of a serious event based on the fact that it’s not an everyday occurrence?”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 166</div></div><p>Jack addresses the same theme when talking to Heinrich about the deadliness of the illness he thinks he has from the Nyodene,</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;I wanted to tell him that statistical evidence of the kind he was quoting from was by nature inconclusive and misleading. I wanted to say that he would learn to regard all such catastrophic findings with equanimity as he matured, grew out of his confining literalism, developed a spirit of informed and skeptical inquiry, advanced in wisdom and rounded judgment, got old, declined, died.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 167</div></div><p>This theme of &ldquo;not knowing what to believe in this media- and marketing-saturated world&rdquo; dominates the book. It was in the culture in 1985 and has only gotten more prevalent—and insidious—in 2021.</p>
<p>This is a danger for everyone. Babette intimates that the admonitions are bogus, but it could also be that <em>society is looking out for her well-being</em> despite her complete ignorance of how to do this on her own—indeed her actively working against it. When society is dishonest all of the time in order to hawk its wares, it&rsquo;s not likely to be trusted when it has something true to impart.</p>
<p>This aspect has only gotten worse and, at some point, people end up paying the piper when society can no longer triple-ply its safety precautions to keep people from harming themselves (I&rsquo;m thinking of the way people are handling the pandemic, two years in). It&rsquo;s a lesson we get to learn again and again, as our system incentivizes lying because it <em>makes more money</em> and <em>there is no downside</em>. This handful of people selling lies ends up spending all of a society&rsquo;s goodwill and diluting its ability to keep its members from harming themselves.</p>
<p>There are some observations about a TV-obsessed 1980s America that apply equally well to a nation—nay, a world—obsessed with its devices, and the entertainment they bring. The following feels, 35 years later, almost universal,</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;“You’re saying it’s more or less universal, to be fascinated by TV disasters.”</p>
<p>&ldquo;“For most people there are only two places in the world. Where they live and their TV set. If a thing happens on television, we have every right to find it fascinating, whatever it is.”&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 66</div></div><p>Replace the word &ldquo;television&rdquo; with &ldquo;phone&rdquo; and &ldquo;TV disasters&rdquo; with &ldquo;fabricated dramas&rdquo; and you&rsquo;ve captured the online world in 2021 accurately enough. Or there&rsquo;s the notion of information overload, which I don&rsquo;t recall being nearly as big a problem in 1985 as it is now (but I was only 13 at the time, so my problem then was not knowing nearly enough). Even &ldquo;fake news&rdquo; gets its turn in this book, called &ldquo;misinformation&rdquo;,</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The family is the cradle of the world’s misinformation. There must be something in family life that generates factual error. […] <strong>Murray says we are fragile creatures surrounded by a world of hostile facts.</strong> Facts threaten our happiness and security. The deeper we delve into the nature of things, the looser our structure may seem to become. The family process works toward sealing off the world. Small errors grow heads, fictions proliferate.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 81</div></div><p>Again this observation seems to strike at the heart of what it is to be human—or living in a group of humans. It makes you wonder whether the fantasies we have of making a better society are even achievable when we&rsquo;re hampered by such seemingly iron laws of behavior—recurring as they do over the decades. No matter how much technology or knowledge we gain, we tread the same ground, too stupid even to notice that it&rsquo;s a repeat with a new coat of paint on it—sometimes not even that.</p>
<p>The book has, in fact, quite a lot to say about how poorly we assimilate and process and reuse information. Another example shows that our tendency to look to the group for leadership and assurance is also not new—it&rsquo;s simply gone online. But in the example below, expertise is sought from anywhere but within—even in complete strangers (just like Twitter).</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;Mainly we looked at people in other cars, trying to work out from their faces how frightened we should be.</p>
<p>&ldquo;[…]</p>
<p>&ldquo;They knew something we didn’t. In a crisis the true facts are whatever other people say they are. No one’s knowledge is less secure than your own.&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 117</div></div><p>The theme of knowing and believing and proving and extrapolating and doubting suffuses the book. Gladney and Murray and Babette—none of them is sure of anything but they must muddle through the day nonetheless. They must make decisions. They must fight against that which they consider to be unknowing or unbelieving or unprovable or wrongheaded or doubtful in order to be sure of themselves. Without this bulwark against which to lean, they&rsquo;d fall over. It is the ideological enemy that lends them surety. Without it, doubt would creep in; but there is no room for doubt when the enemy must be defeated.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;There must always be believers. Fools, idiots, those who hear voices, those who speak in tongues. We are your lunatics. We surrender our lives to make your nonbelief possible. You are sure that you are right but you don’t want everyone to think as you do. There is no truth without fools.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 304</div></div><p>It was a decent enough book, thought-provoking, but not in what I would call a novel way. [3] I feel I got more out of thinking and writing about it than I did from reading it, but that&rsquo;s how it is with some books. They&rsquo;re good books—important books?—but someone who reads a book for entertainment will be harder to reach with this one.</p>
<p><hr></p>
<div class="footnote-reference"><span id="footnote_DRAFTABLE_ENTRY_4383_1_body" class="footnote-number">[1]</span> Disclaimer: these are notes I took while reading this book. They include citations I found interesting or enlightening or particularly well-written. In some cases, I&rsquo;ve pointed out which of these applies to which citation; in others, I have not. Any benefit you gain from reading these notes is purely incidental to the purpose they serve of reminding me of what I once read. Please see Wikipedia for a summary if I&rsquo;ve failed to provide one sufficient for your purposes. If my notes serve to trigger an interest in this book, then I&rsquo;m happy for you.</div><h2>Citations</h2><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The eventual heat death of the universe that scientists love to talk about is already well underway and you can feel it happening all around you in any large or medium-sized city. Heat and wetness.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 10</div></div><p>I can&rsquo;t tell if he&rsquo;s kidding, but the heat death is about a dearth of heat, not a surfeit.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;It seemed to me that Babette and I, in the mass and variety of our purchases, in the sheer plenitude those crowded bags suggested, the weight and size and number, the familiar package designs and vivid lettering, the giant sizes, the family bargain packs with Day-Glo sale stickers, in the sense of replenishment we felt, the sense of well-being, the security and contentment these products brought to some snug home in our souls—it seemed we had achieved a fullness of being that is not known to people who need less, expect less, who plan their lives around lonely walks in the evening.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 20</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;“People who can fix things are usually bigots.”</p>
<p>&ldquo;“What do you mean?”</p>
<p>&ldquo;“Think of all the people who’ve ever come to your house to fix things. They were all bigots, weren’t they?”</p>
<p>&ldquo;“I don’t know.”</p>
<p>&ldquo;“They drove panel trucks, didn’t they, with an extension ladder on the roof and some kind of plastic charm dangling from the rearview mirror?”</p>
<p>&ldquo;“I don’t know, Murray.”</p>
<p>&ldquo;“It’s obvious,” he said.&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 33</div></div><p>Murray is a wonderful caricature of liberals of any day and age, so smug in their superiority to the lesser classes.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;“They’re always saying boil your water,” Babette said. “It’s the new thing, like turn your wheel in the direction of the skid.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 34</div></div><p>Nice. People not understanding the severity of admonitions. It&rsquo;s nice how this ignorance from 1985 echoes 35 years later, knee-deep in a pandemic.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;I realized the place was awash in noise. The toneless systems, the jangle and skid of carts, the loudspeaker and coffee-making machines, the cries of children. And over it all, or under it all, a dull and unlocatable roar, as of some form of swarming life just outside the range of human apprehension.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 36</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;“You’re saying maybe you’re taking something that has the side effect of impairing memory.”</p>
<p>&ldquo;“Either I’m taking something and I don’t remember or I’m not taking something and I don’t remember. My life is either/or.&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 53</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;As a volunteer reader to the blind, Babette had some reservations about the old gent’s appetite for the unspeakable and seamy, believing that the handicapped were morally bound to higher types of entertainment. If we couldn’t look to them for victories of the human spirit, who could we look to? They had an example to set just as she did as a reader and morale-booster. But she was professional in her duty, reading to him with high earnestness, as to a child, about dead men who leave messages on answering machines.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 57</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Denise came in and sprawled across the foot of the bed, her head resting on her folded arms, facing away from me. How many codes, countercodes, social histories were contained in this simple posture? A full minute passed.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 61</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;“You’re saying it’s more or less universal, to be fascinated by TV disasters.”</p>
<p>&ldquo;“For most people there are only two places in the world. Where they live and their TV set. If a thing happens on television, we have every right to find it fascinating, whatever it is.”&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 66</div></div><p>This feels a bit like <em>Infinite Jest</em>, with the fascination with television. The concept outlined above applies smoothly to any screen.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;Elliot Lasher threw a chunk of raw carrot at him, then asked, “Did you ever have a woman peel flaking skin from your back after a few days at the beach?” </p>
<p>&ldquo;“Cocoa Beach, Florida,” Cotsakis said. “It was very tremendous. The second or third greatest experience of my life.”</p>
<p>&ldquo;“Was she naked?” Lasher said.</p>
<p>&ldquo;“To the waist,” Cotsakis said.</p>
<p>&ldquo;“From which direction?” Lasher said. I watched Grappa throw a cracker at Murray. He skimmed it backhand like a Frisbee.&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 68</div></div><p>I like the succinctness of that question. It&rsquo;s relevant to picturing the story.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The family is the cradle of the world’s misinformation. There must be something in family life that generates factual error. Overcloseness, the noise and heat of being. Perhaps something even deeper, like the need to survive. Murray says we are fragile creatures surrounded by a world of hostile facts. Facts threaten our happiness and security. The deeper we delve into the nature of things, the looser our structure may seem to become. The family process works toward sealing off the world. Small errors grow heads, fictions proliferate.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 81</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;“Indonesia, more or less. Malcolm’s working in deep cover, sponsoring a Communist revival. It’s part of an elegant scheme designed to topple Castro. Let’s get out of here, Tuck, before children come swarming around to beg.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 86</div></div><p>There are these occasional jarring reminders that the world they inhabit is vaguely more dystopian than ours. The unironic Hitler studies was one of the first signs.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;Attila the Hun died young. He was still in his forties. Did he feel sorry for himself, succumb to self-pity and depression? He was the King of the Huns, the Invader of Europe, the Scourge of God.</p>
<p>&ldquo;I want to believe he lay in his tent, wrapped in animal skins, as in some internationally financed movie epic, and said brave cruel things to his aides and retainers. No weakening of the spirit. No sense of the irony of human existence, that we are the highest form of life on earth and yet ineffably sad because we know what no other animal knows, that we must die.</p>
<p>&ldquo;Attila did not look through the opening in his tent and gesture at some lame dog standing at the edge of the fire waiting to be thrown a scrap of meat. He did not say, “That pathetic flea-ridden beast is better off than the greatest ruler of men. It doesn’t know what we know, it doesn’t feel what we feel, it can’t be sad as we are sad.”&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 98</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;This is the level of our discourse. The relative size of holes, abysses and gaps. We have serious arguments on this level. She says if her death is capable of leaving a large hole in my life, my death would leave an abyss in hers, a great yawning gulf. I counter with a profound depth or void. And so it goes into the night. These arguments never seem foolish at the time. Such is the dignifying power of our subject.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 100</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;When I was halfway down the street I saw Heinrich crouched on a small ledge outside our attic window. He wore his camouflage jacket and cap, an outfit with complex meaning for him, at fourteen, struggling to grow and to escape notice simultaneously, his secrets known to us all. He looked east through binoculars.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 107</div></div><p>This family reminds me of a Wes Anderson movie.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;“These things happen to poor people who live in exposed areas. Society is set up in such a way that it’s the poor and the uneducated who suffer the main impact of natural and man-made disasters. People in low-lying areas get the floods, people in shanties get the hurricanes and tornados.</p>
<p>&ldquo;I’m a college professor. Did you ever see a college professor rowing a boat down his own street in one of those TV floods? We live in a neat and pleasant town near a college with a quaint name. These things don’t happen in places like Blacksmith.”&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 112</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The men in Mylex suits moved with a lunar caution. Each step was the exercise of some anxiety not provided for by instinct. Fire and explosion were not the inherent dangers here. This death would penetrate, seep into the genes, show itself in bodies not yet born.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 114</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;We made it onto the road as snow began to fall. We had little to say to each other, our minds not yet adjusted to the actuality of things, the absurd fact of evacuation. Mainly we looked at people in other cars, trying to work out from their faces how frightened we should be.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 117</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;They knew something we didn’t. In a crisis the true facts are whatever other people say they are. No one’s knowledge is less secure than your own.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 117</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;People listened attentively to this adolescent boy in a field jacket and cap, with binoculars strapped around his neck and an Instamatic fastened to his belt. No doubt his listeners were influenced by his age. He would be truthful and earnest, serving no special interest; he would have an awareness of the environment; his knowledge of chemistry would be fresh and up-to-date.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 126</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;“It’s like we’ve been flung back in time,” he said. “Here we are in the Stone Age, knowing all these great things after centuries of progress but what can we do to make life easier for the Stone Agers? Can we make a refrigerator? Can we even explain how it works? What is electricity? What is light? We experience these things every day of our lives but what good does it do if we find ourselves hurled back in time and we can’t even tell people the basic principles much less actually make something that would improve conditions. Name one thing you could make. Could you make a simple wooden match that you could strike on a rock to make a flame?&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 142</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;“I’d like to lose interest in myself,” I told Murray. “Is there any chance of that happening?”</p>
<p>&ldquo;“None. Better men have tried.”</p>
<p>&ldquo;“I guess you’re right.”</p>
<p>&ldquo;“It’s obvious.”&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 146</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;“That’s the point,” she said. “Every day on the news there’s another toxic spill. Cancerous solvents from storage tanks, arsenic from smokestacks, radioactive water from power plants. How serious can it be if it happens all the time? Isn’t the definition of a serious event based on the fact that it’s not an everyday occurrence?”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 166</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;I wanted to argue with him. I wanted to ask him why I should believe these scientific findings but not the results that indicated we were safe from Nyodene contamination. But what could I say, considering my condition? I wanted to tell him that statistical evidence of the kind he was quoting from was by nature inconclusive and misleading. I wanted to say that he would learn to regard all such catastrophic findings with equanimity as he matured, grew out of his confining literalism, developed a spirit of informed and skeptical inquiry, advanced in wisdom and rounded judgment, got old, declined, died.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 167</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;I tell myself I have reached an age, the age of unreliable menace. The world is full of abandoned meanings. In the commonplace I find unexpected themes and intensities.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 175</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;“This is not a story about your disappointment at my silence. The theme of this story is my pain and my attempts to end it.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 183</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The enormity of the mission, of flying to a foreign country at nearly supersonic speed, at thirty thousand feet, alone, in a humped container of titanium and steel, caused her to grow momentarily silent.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 203</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;“You could put your faith in technology. It got you here, it can get you out. This is the whole point of technology. It creates an appetite for immortality on the one hand. It threatens universal extinction on the other. Technology is lust removed from nature.”</p>
<p>&ldquo;“It is?”</p>
<p>&ldquo;“It’s what we invented to conceal the terrible secret of our decaying bodies. But it’s also life, isn’t it? It prolongs life, it provides new organs for those that wear out. New devices, new techniques every day. Lasers, masers, ultrasound. Give yourself up to it, Jack. Believe in it. They’ll insert you in a gleaming tube, irradiate your body with the basic stuff of the universe. Light, energy, dreams. God’s own goodness.”&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 272</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;I ran a red light when I crossed Middlebrook. Reaching the end of the expressway ramp, I did not yield. All the way to Iron City, I felt a sense of dreaminess, release, unreality. I slowed down at the toll gate but did not bother tossing a quarter into the basket. An alarm went off but no one pursued. What’s another quarter to a state that is billions in debt? What’s twenty-five cents when we are talking about a nine-thousand-dollar stolen car? This must be how people escape the pull of the earth, the gravitational leaf-flutter that brings us hourly closer to dying. Simply stop obeying. Steal instead of buy, shoot instead of talk. I ran two more lights on the rainy approach roads to Iron City.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 288</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;“All the others. The others who spend their lives believing that we still believe. It is our task in the world to believe things no one else takes seriously. To abandon such beliefs completely, the human race would die. This is why we are here. A tiny minority. To embody old things, old beliefs. The devil, the angels, heaven, hell. If we did not pretend to believe these things, the world would collapse.”</p>
<p>&ldquo;“Pretend?”</p>
<p>&ldquo;“Of course pretend. Do you think we are stupid? Get out from here.”</p>
<p>&ldquo;“You don’t believe in heaven? A nun?”</p>
<p>&ldquo;“If you don’t, why should I?”</p>
<p>&ldquo;“If you did, maybe I would.”</p>
<p>&ldquo;“If I did, you would not have to.”&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 303</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Those who have abandoned belief must still believe in us. They are sure that they are right not to believe but they know belief must not fade completely. Hell is when no one believes. There must always be believers. Fools, idiots, those who hear voices, those who speak in tongues. We are your lunatics. We surrender our lives to make your nonbelief possible. You are sure that you are right but you don’t want everyone to think as you do. There is no truth without fools.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 304</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The supermarket shelves have been rearranged. It happened one day without warning. There is agitation and panic in the aisles, dismay in the faces of older shoppers. They walk in a fragmented trance, stop and go, clusters of well-dressed figures frozen in the aisles, trying to figure out the pattern, discern the underlying logic, trying to remember where they’d seen the Cream of Wheat. They see no reason for it, find no sense in it. The scouring pads are with the hand soap now, the condiments are scattered.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 309</div></div><p><hr></p>
<div class="footnote-reference"><span id="footnote_DRAFTABLE_ENTRY_4383_2_body" class="footnote-number">[2]</span> A quick search to determine whether anyone&rsquo;s made a movie of this shows that Noah Baumbach is directing a <a href="https://www.imdb.com/title/tt6160448/">film</a> of the book, to be released in 1922. Adam Driver will be playing Jack Gladney.</div><div class="footnote-reference"><span id="footnote_DRAFTABLE_ENTRY_4383_3_body" class="footnote-number">[3]</span> Not novel for me, anyway, but maybe that&rsquo;s because the book was written in 1985, and I&rsquo;ve read imitators since then, e.g. <em>Infinite Jest</em>.</div>      </div>
      </div>
        <div class="footer">
    <div class="footer-data"><div class="footer-links"><ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/contact.php" title="">Contact</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/support.php" title="">Support</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/privacy.php" title="">Privacy</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/rights.php" title="">Rights</a></li></ul></div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="copyright">Copyright (c) 1999-2026 earthli.com. All Rights Reserved.</div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="versions">Powered by <ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore/app_news.php">earthli News 3.7</a></li><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore" title="">earthli WebCore&trade; 3.7</a></li></ul></div></div>    </div>
      </div>
  </div>  </body>
</html>
]]>
  </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
      <title type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[Kindle Books Written by AIs Vol.2021.4]]>
  </title>
    <id>https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=4370</id>
    <link href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=4370"/>
    <updated>2021-12-23T12:51:12+01:00</updated>
    <author>
        <name type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[Marco von Ballmoos]]>
  </name>
      <uri>https://earthli.com/users/marco</uri>
    </author>
      <summary type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<p>This is the latest roundup of book titles that my Kindle shows me when I&rsquo;m not reading it. Long ago, I considered paying to turn off this advertising, but it&rsquo;s proven to be so entertaining that I&rsquo;m happy I never gave in.</p>
<p>This is a view into what people are reading or what Amazon would like people... [<a class="complete-text-link" href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=4370">More</a>]</p>
]]>
  </summary>
      <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<html lang="en">
  <head>
    <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/themes/ice.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/fonts/raleway.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/core/medium.css">
  </head>
  <body>
<div class="style-controls">  <div class="page">
    <div class="page-body">
<div class="info-box-top">
<p>
Published by <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_user.php?name=marco" title="Marco von Ballmoos" class="visible">marco</a> on <span class="date-time">23. Dec 2021 12:51:12 (GMT-5)</span>
</p>
<p>
Updated by <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_user.php?name=marco" title="Marco von Ballmoos" class="visible">marco</a> on <span class="date-time">23. Dec 2021 13:18:15 (GMT-5)</span>
</p>
</div>
      <div class="text-flow wide">
  <p>This is the latest roundup of book titles that my Kindle shows me when I&rsquo;m not reading it. Long ago, I considered paying to turn off this advertising, but it&rsquo;s proven to be so entertaining that I&rsquo;m happy I never gave in.</p>
<p>This is a view into what people are reading or what Amazon would like people to be reading or … whatever. I simply observe and catalog. I also sometimes have to hide my Kindle in public places so that no-one calls the police for what they think I&rsquo;m reading.</p>
<h2>Bethlehem, NC and other Stories</h2><p><span style="width: 450px; display: table"><span class="auto-content-inline"><a href="https://www.earthli.com/data/news/attachments/entry/4370/bethlehem_inc..jpeg"><img src="https://www.earthli.com/data/news/attachments/entry/4370/bethlehem_inc..jpeg" alt=" " style="width: 450px"></a></span><span class="auto-content-caption"><a href="https://www.earthli.com/data/news/attachments/entry/4370/bethlehem_inc..jpeg">Bethlehem, NC and other Stories</a></span></span></p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Short stories you need right now. Arguably a celebration of all that is wrong. You could be angry, but we&rsquo;re betting you laugh.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>The author&rsquo;s name is Pooch Mcgee. There is what looks like a walleyed cow on the cover. I have no idea what this book is about from the blurb. Is it about a town in North Carolina? Why would I be angry about that? Because the author celebrates what is wrong? 60% chance this was an AI—it&rsquo;s certainly possible that this person either has English as a second language or they took a marketing class and just threw everything they had at it.</p>
<h2>Double Life: The Other Girl</h2><p><span style="width: 420px; display: table"><span class="auto-content-inline"><a href="https://www.earthli.com/data/news/attachments/entry/4370/double_life-_the_other_girl.jpeg"><img src="https://www.earthli.com/data/news/attachments/entry/4370/double_life-_the_other_girl.jpeg" alt=" " style="width: 420px"></a></span><span class="auto-content-caption"><a href="https://www.earthli.com/data/news/attachments/entry/4370/double_life-_the_other_girl.jpeg">Double Life: The Other Girl</a></span></span></p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Richard discovers that the woman he is dating for five years is currently marry and living a double life. Find out how he confronts her.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>If the author wrote the blurb, I can&rsquo;t imagine what a wild ride of mis-conjugation the book itself has to offer. <span class="quote-inline">&ldquo;the woman he is dating for five years&rdquo;</span> is non-sensical. It should be &ldquo;the woman he <strong>has been</strong> dating for five years&rdquo; [1]. However, it&rsquo;s not surprising that this form of conjugation stymied the author since he/they also can&rsquo;t conjugate in the simple past—<span class="quote-inline">&ldquo;currently marry&rdquo;</span> should be &ldquo;currently married&rdquo;. 30% chance that this is an AI. AIs write weird things, but they generally don&rsquo;t fall into these kinds of errors. This seems very much like a human with poor English grammar (or some poor soul writing blurbs in a second language). On the other hand, maybe that&rsquo;s what the AIs <em>want you to think</em>.</p>
<h2>The Boltons of the Little Boltons</h2><p><span style="width: 420px; display: table"><span class="auto-content-inline"><a href="https://www.earthli.com/data/news/attachments/entry/4370/the_boltons_of_the_little_boltons.jpeg"><img src="https://www.earthli.com/data/news/attachments/entry/4370/the_boltons_of_the_little_boltons.jpeg" alt=" " style="width: 420px"></a></span><span class="auto-content-caption"><a href="https://www.earthli.com/data/news/attachments/entry/4370/the_boltons_of_the_little_boltons.jpeg">The Boltons of the Little Boltons</a></span></span></p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;New Zealand couple working as servants in a posh London home in 1992. True, gentle, informative and amusing.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>Neither of those two fragments are sentences. They are, however, reasonably well-constructed. On its own, the blurb isn&rsquo;t that weird, but combined with the rest: <span class="quote-inline">&ldquo;The Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea&rdquo;</span> and what&rsquo;s up with the <span class="quote-inline">&ldquo;SW10&rdquo;</span>? And why does the author&rsquo;s last name match the name mentioned twice in the title? The whole cover looks like a school-play pamphlet. Altogether <em>weird</em>. 80% chance that this is an AI throwing shit at a wall to see what sticks.</p>
<h2>The singular adventures of a strict Buddhist: a barrage</h2><p><span style="width: 420px; display: table"><span class="auto-content-inline"><a href="https://www.earthli.com/data/news/attachments/entry/4370/the_singular_adventures_of_a_strict_buddhist-_a_barrage.jpeg"><img src="https://www.earthli.com/data/news/attachments/entry/4370/the_singular_adventures_of_a_strict_buddhist-_a_barrage.jpeg" alt=" " style="width: 420px"></a></span><span class="auto-content-caption"><a href="https://www.earthli.com/data/news/attachments/entry/4370/the_singular_adventures_of_a_strict_buddhist-_a_barrage.jpeg">The singular adventures of a strict Buddhist: a barrage</a></span></span></p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Mr Jane is out of time, a job, and his mind. Debbie, on the other hand, is flourishing. Beware: of the friend of a friend.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>The punctuation suggests a British origin (no full-stop after &ldquo;Mr&rdquo; and an oxford comma). The last sentence has a superfluous and distracting colon in it. Otherwise, the text is fine. The cover is odd: why is there a whole line between the colon and the subtitle? Why is the &ldquo;G&rdquo; the only letter with such a strong flourish in that font? Why is the author&rsquo;s name not centered, but also not left-aligned with the title? Why does the line separating the title and author stop short of the right margin, but not the left? 50% chance that this is a very good AI.</p>
<h2>Outcast</h2><p><span style="width: 424px; display: table"><span class="auto-content-inline"><a href="https://www.earthli.com/data/news/attachments/entry/4370/outcast.jpeg"><img src="https://www.earthli.com/data/news/attachments/entry/4370/outcast.jpeg" alt=" " style="width: 424px"></a></span><span class="auto-content-caption"><a href="https://www.earthli.com/data/news/attachments/entry/4370/outcast.jpeg">Outcast</a></span></span></p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Harry Potter meets Percy Jackson in this complete spellbinding series.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>This is just a lazy summary. I&rsquo;m almost certain they meant to write &ldquo;completely&rdquo;, not &ldquo;complete&rdquo; but I&rsquo;m a stickler for adverbs, so what do I know? Maybe they meant to say that the book is &ldquo;complete&rdquo;, as in it was released <em>after</em> they&rsquo;d finished it. It&rsquo;s a bit of a weird flex but, again, what do I know? What I don&rsquo;t know if that there is a girl on the cover and the text says that the book is &ldquo;Harry Potter meets Percy Jackson&rdquo;, both (ostensibly) male characters. But here I go again, making assumptions. The author&rsquo;s name is 100% fake and the series title includes the nearly definitionally illegible &ldquo;spellslingers&rdquo;. I give it a 70% chance that this one was hashed together by an AI.</p>
<h2>What to do with a Dead Boomer</h2><p><span style="width: 420px; display: table"><span class="auto-content-inline"><a href="https://www.earthli.com/data/news/attachments/entry/4370/what_to_do_with_a_dead_boomer.jpeg"><img src="https://www.earthli.com/data/news/attachments/entry/4370/what_to_do_with_a_dead_boomer.jpeg" alt=" " style="width: 420px"></a></span><span class="auto-content-caption"><a href="https://www.earthli.com/data/news/attachments/entry/4370/what_to_do_with_a_dead_boomer.jpeg">What to do with a Dead Boomer</a></span></span></p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;With all those Dead Boomers piling up everywhere, learn how Millennial entrepreneurs find a way to turn them into fully functioning consumer products.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>These kind of things never age well. Just because the slur is quasi-acceptable today doesn&rsquo;t mean you should put it on the cover of a book. Let&rsquo;s imagine this cover with other quasi-bygone slurs, like, what if you wrote a book called &ldquo;What to do with a Dead Jew&rdquo;? You had better be <em>super-clear</em> that you&rsquo;re the second coming of Philip Roth or that you, at the very least, are a <em>serious writer</em> and have every intent of backing up your provocative title with serious analysis of the sickness of a society in which that title even has a chance of being satirical. If you just &ldquo;meant it as a joke&rdquo;, then things will not go well for your book sales. [2] The same analysis applies for &ldquo;N___er&rdquo; or &ldquo;Fa__ot&rdquo; or supply your own slur.</p>
<p>There is no chance this was written by an AI. They are too smart to do this already. It had to have been one or more humans. [3]</p>
<p><hr></p>
<div class="footnote-reference"><span id="footnote_DRAFTABLE_ENTRY_4370_1_body" class="footnote-number">[1]</span> In English, the verb form must correspond to the temporal gist of the sentence. You just can&rsquo;t say &ldquo;he is dating for five years&rdquo;. You <em>can</em> do it, of course. People will probably understand what you&rsquo;re getting at, but you&rsquo;re putting the interpretive burden on the listener, which used to be frowned upon. English has two forms for this (I don&rsquo;t know their official names). If he is <em>still</em> dating her, then it should be &ldquo;the woman he <strong>has</strong> been dating for five years&rdquo;. If he is <em>no longer</em> dating her, then it should be &ldquo;the woman he <strong>had</strong> been dating for five years&rdquo;.</div><div class="footnote-reference"><span id="footnote_DRAFTABLE_ENTRY_4370_2_body" class="footnote-number">[2]</span> HAHAHAHA I&rsquo;m kidding, of course. Your book sales will skyrocket as both people who  support your irony-free list of ideas and those who hate the fact that they are not legally allowed to kill you will buy your book—the former out of fervent support and the latter out of spite. This is the world we live in, folks. A world of unbounded luxury that allows us to squander the precious moments we get—before the lights go out again—on utter bullshit.</div><div class="footnote-reference"><span id="footnote_DRAFTABLE_ENTRY_4370_3_body" class="footnote-number">[3]</span> You may be thinking to yourself, &ldquo;Duh, yeah. It has two authors right on the cover,&rdquo; but you are forgetting that <em>nothing is ever true anymore</em>. Nearly everyone writes under a pseudonym (or pseudonyms) tailored to fit the intended audience&rsquo;s perception of what the author&rsquo;s name should be. We live in a world of artifice, grasping for truth.</div>      </div>
      </div>
        <div class="footer">
    <div class="footer-data"><div class="footer-links"><ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/contact.php" title="">Contact</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/support.php" title="">Support</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/privacy.php" title="">Privacy</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/rights.php" title="">Rights</a></li></ul></div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="copyright">Copyright (c) 1999-2026 earthli.com. All Rights Reserved.</div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="versions">Powered by <ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore/app_news.php">earthli News 3.7</a></li><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore" title="">earthli WebCore&trade; 3.7</a></li></ul></div></div>    </div>
      </div>
  </div>  </body>
</html>
]]>
  </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
      <title type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[Kindle Books Written by AIs Vol.2021.3]]>
  </title>
    <id>https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=4293</id>
    <link href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=4293"/>
    <updated>2021-10-12T21:29:55+02:00</updated>
    <author>
        <name type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[Marco von Ballmoos]]>
  </name>
      <uri>https://earthli.com/users/marco</uri>
    </author>
      <summary type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<p>This is the latest roundup of book titles that my Kindle shows me when I&rsquo;m not reading it. Long ago, I considered paying to turn off this advertising, but it&rsquo;s proven to be so entertaining that I&rsquo;m happy I never gave in and did it. This is a view into what people are reading or what Amazon would... [<a class="complete-text-link" href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=4293">More</a>]</p>
]]>
  </summary>
      <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<html lang="en">
  <head>
    <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/themes/ice.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/fonts/raleway.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/core/medium.css">
  </head>
  <body>
<div class="style-controls">  <div class="page">
    <div class="page-body">
<div class="info-box-top">
<p>
Published by <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_user.php?name=marco" title="Marco von Ballmoos" class="visible">marco</a> on <span class="date-time">12. Oct 2021 21:29:55 (GMT-5)</span>
</p>
</div>
      <div class="text-flow wide">
  <p>This is the latest roundup of book titles that my Kindle shows me when I&rsquo;m not reading it. Long ago, I considered paying to turn off this advertising, but it&rsquo;s proven to be so entertaining that I&rsquo;m happy I never gave in and did it. This is a view into what people are reading or what Amazon would like people to be reading or … whatever. I simply observe and catalog. I also sometimes have to hide my Kindle in public places so that no-one calls the police for what they think I&rsquo;m reading. [1]</p>
<h2>Bad Witch, Good Familiar</h2><p><span style="width: 309px; display: table"><span class="auto-content-inline"><a href="https://www.earthli.com/data/news/attachments/entry/4293/bad_with,_good_familiar.jpeg"><img src="https://www.earthli.com/data/news/attachments/entry/4293/bad_with,_good_familiar.jpeg" alt=" " style="width: 309px"></a></span><span class="auto-content-caption"><a href="https://www.earthli.com/data/news/attachments/entry/4293/bad_with,_good_familiar.jpeg">Bad Witch, Good Familiar</a></span></span></p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;A 12 year old witch learns of her magic. Her kitten, family, and gay best friend watch her powers strengthen. Can she keep them under control?&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>I continue to be impressed with how utterly resistant people are to using hyphens or apostrophes (&ldquo;12-year-old witch&rdquo; here). It&rsquo;s crucial to mention that her best friend is gay, of course. What good would she be otherwise? Somehow, this is already the second edition of this book. I commend the author for their success (I&rsquo;m totally not even going to assume a gender).</p>
<h2>Living Behind Infinity</h2><p><span style="width: 300px; display: table"><span class="auto-content-inline"><a href="https://www.earthli.com/data/news/attachments/entry/4293/living_behind_infinity.jpeg"><img src="https://www.earthli.com/data/news/attachments/entry/4293/living_behind_infinity.jpeg" alt=" " style="width: 300px"></a></span><span class="auto-content-caption"><a href="https://www.earthli.com/data/news/attachments/entry/4293/living_behind_infinity.jpeg">Living Behind Infinity</a></span></span></p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Unlocking mysteries surrounding the deaths of a young girls parents aren&rsquo;t giving clarity. The answers are opening a door that needs to stay closed.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>I think the AIs in this round have taken a step backward. Again, we&rsquo;re missing apostrophes (&ldquo;young girl&rsquo;s parents&rdquo;). Subject-verb agreement is similarly suffering here, <span class="quote-inline">&ldquo;Unlocking mysteries […] aren&rsquo;t giving clarity&rdquo;</span>? I love the author&rsquo;s name because it&rsquo;s clearly fabricated (apologies if I&rsquo;m wrong). This book is a prologue to a presumably long and painful and inexplicably successful series. Or that&rsquo;s what the AI wants you to think.</p>
<h2>The Black Saint</h2><p><span style="width: 289px; display: table"><span class="auto-content-inline"><a href="https://www.earthli.com/data/news/attachments/entry/4293/the_black_saint.jpeg"><img src="https://www.earthli.com/data/news/attachments/entry/4293/the_black_saint.jpeg" alt=" " style="width: 289px"></a></span><span class="auto-content-caption"><a href="https://www.earthli.com/data/news/attachments/entry/4293/the_black_saint.jpeg">The Black Saint</a></span></span></p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Batman meets Lord of the Rings in this faced paced fantasy action novel.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>I&rsquo;m willing to hazard, should it turn out that this book was not written by an AI, that the author wrote &ldquo;Batman meets Lord of the Rings&rdquo; in their 3-ring binder in junior high school when the first lines of this book emerged, fully-formed, in their mind. It&rsquo;s a pity that the editor couldn&rsquo;t spare a second to fix &ldquo;faced paced&rdquo; (or to add any hyphens to &ldquo;faced-paced&rdquo; and &ldquo;fantasy-action&rdquo;). 40% chance this was an AI—it seems too sadly human.</p>
<h2>Callie Awakens</h2><p><span style="width: 297px; display: table"><span class="auto-content-inline"><a href="https://www.earthli.com/data/news/attachments/entry/4293/callie_awakens.jpeg"><img src="https://www.earthli.com/data/news/attachments/entry/4293/callie_awakens.jpeg" alt=" " style="width: 297px"></a></span><span class="auto-content-caption"><a href="https://www.earthli.com/data/news/attachments/entry/4293/callie_awakens.jpeg">Callie Awakens</a></span></span></p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Evil in Fort Meyers. MS-13 is snatching young girls off the street for the sex trade…until Callie puts an end to them with brains and Krav Maga.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>I can&rsquo;t even with these author names. &ldquo;Rip Converse&rdquo;. Your parents did not name you that. You chose that name. You probably sat next to Timo Burnham (author of &ldquo;Black Saint&rdquo; above) and spitballed author names while they were scrawling &ldquo;Batman meets Lord of the Rings&rdquo; into their 3-ring binder. Callie uses both brains and Krav Maga. Good for her. She sounds like a catch. 40% chance.</p>
<h2>Always Together</h2><p><span style="width: 300px; display: table"><span class="auto-content-inline"><a href="https://www.earthli.com/data/news/attachments/entry/4293/always_together.jpeg"><img src="https://www.earthli.com/data/news/attachments/entry/4293/always_together.jpeg" alt=" " style="width: 300px"></a></span><span class="auto-content-caption"><a href="https://www.earthli.com/data/news/attachments/entry/4293/always_together.jpeg">Always Together</a></span></span></p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;A boy named Jack who&rsquo;s lost it all, due to an obsessive girl who appears in his dreams for a supposed promise he&rsquo;s told her with devotion and unity.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>I have nothing to add. That summary sentence is perfect. The author shoved everything they had into it and it shows. Bravo. 65% chance of being an AI.</p>
<h2>Hacked</h2><p><span style="width: 311px; display: table"><span class="auto-content-inline"><a href="https://www.earthli.com/data/news/attachments/entry/4293/hacked.jpeg"><img src="https://www.earthli.com/data/news/attachments/entry/4293/hacked.jpeg" alt=" " style="width: 311px"></a></span><span class="auto-content-caption"><a href="https://www.earthli.com/data/news/attachments/entry/4293/hacked.jpeg">Hacked</a></span></span></p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;A soft echo that vibrates the strings of an iron heart.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>This one is genuinely good. I have nothing snarky to add. 10% chance that this is an AI—either it&rsquo;s a real person or we&rsquo;re in trouble.</p>
<h2>Fannie and the Firearms Factory</h2><p><span style="width: 300px; display: table"><span class="auto-content-inline"><a href="https://www.earthli.com/data/news/attachments/entry/4293/fannie_and_the_firearms_factory.jpeg"><img src="https://www.earthli.com/data/news/attachments/entry/4293/fannie_and_the_firearms_factory.jpeg" alt=" " style="width: 300px"></a></span><span class="auto-content-caption"><a href="https://www.earthli.com/data/news/attachments/entry/4293/fannie_and_the_firearms_factory.jpeg">Fannie and the Firearms Factory</a></span></span></p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Charlton Chambers, the most &lsquo;great again&rsquo; capitalist, invites you to open your eyes (and wallet) and take a tour of his fanatical factory.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>This is a tough one: it&rsquo;s almost too on-the-nose for an AI. The book is obviously modeled on <em>Roald Dahl&rsquo;s</em> book <em>Charlie and the Chocolate Factory</em> (known to many by the film <em>Willy Wonka &amp; the Chocolate Factory</em>). The reference to <span class="quote-inline">&ldquo;great again&rdquo;</span> is almost certainly a reference to Donald Trump, but I don&rsquo;t know if the <em>fanatical</em> was intentional. Or maybe this book is a parody of the kind of book that liberals think that right-wing gun-nuts (their words) want their children to read? In Dahl&rsquo;s (not Deahl&rsquo;s) book, Grandpa Joe describes <span class="quote-inline">&ldquo;Mr. Willy Wonka&rdquo;</span> as  <span class="quote-inline">&ldquo;[…] the most amazing, the most fantastic, the most extraordinary chocolate maker the world has ever seen!&rdquo;</span> So maybe they transposed a letter and got &ldquo;fanatical&rdquo; instead of &ldquo;fantastic&rdquo;?</p>
<h2>Dead, Dead, Dead, the Little Girl Said</h2><p><span style="width: 300px; display: table"><span class="auto-content-inline"><a href="https://www.earthli.com/data/news/attachments/entry/4293/dead_dead_dead,_the_little_girl_said.jpeg"><img src="https://www.earthli.com/data/news/attachments/entry/4293/dead_dead_dead,_the_little_girl_said.jpeg" alt=" " style="width: 300px"></a></span><span class="auto-content-caption"><a href="https://www.earthli.com/data/news/attachments/entry/4293/dead_dead_dead,_the_little_girl_said.jpeg">Dead, Dead, Dead, the little girl said</a></span></span></p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Harry and Cat team up with a petite, mouthy bodybuilder with an aversion to cats to hunt a killer. Trouble, confusion, and terror ensue.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>If &ldquo;Bentley Dadmun&rdquo; is the author&rsquo;s real name, then I apologize for immediately thinking that there is no way that this could be a real name. The description is tantalizing but has that kitchen-sink feel that so many of these novels have. The title is haunting. I give it a 60% chance of being a book invented by an AI and a 0% of the book being as interesting as it sounds, even if you were into petite, mouthy bodybuilders (are we to assume a female bodybuilder here?).</p>
<h2>The African Boy Legend and the American Girl Superstar</h2><p><span style="width: 298px; display: table"><span class="auto-content-inline"><a href="https://www.earthli.com/data/news/attachments/entry/4293/the_african_boy_legend_and_the_american_girl_superstar.jpeg"><img src="https://www.earthli.com/data/news/attachments/entry/4293/the_african_boy_legend_and_the_american_girl_superstar.jpeg" alt=" " style="width: 298px"></a></span><span class="auto-content-caption"><a href="https://www.earthli.com/data/news/attachments/entry/4293/the_african_boy_legend_and_the_american_girl_superstar.jpeg">The African Boy Legend and the American Girl Superstar</a></span></span></p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Two legends of extraordinary talent, appearance and wisdom travel continents, the dream world and alternate realities to find love and championships.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>At first, it seems like a typically overpromising YA fiction book, but the blurb stumbles on the last word, &ldquo;championships&rdquo;. They find love and championships? What? And really, as if the title itself wasn&rsquo;t too long (and painstakingly descriptive) already, the sub-title is just as long, &ldquo;Adventure, Dreams and Sports in the Rip-Roaring 2020s&rdquo;. What does that even mean? I give it an 80% chance of having been written by an AI. I almost forgot to even mention that the author&rsquo;s name is King Atlas V. 90% chance.</p>
<h2>When God Says No</h2><p><span style="width: 320px; display: table"><span class="auto-content-inline"><a href="https://www.earthli.com/data/news/attachments/entry/4293/when_god_says_no.jpeg"><img src="https://www.earthli.com/data/news/attachments/entry/4293/when_god_says_no.jpeg" alt=" " style="width: 320px"></a></span><span class="auto-content-caption"><a href="https://www.earthli.com/data/news/attachments/entry/4293/when_god_says_no.jpeg">When God Says No</a></span></span></p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;This&rsquo;s the story of two girls struggling to understand the value of being alive. The event is fictional because the truth is strictly confidential.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>I have never in my life seen &ldquo;this is&rdquo; contracted as &ldquo;this&rsquo;s&rdquo;. Perhaps it&rsquo;s a generational thing. Other than that, the first sentence is fine. I don&rsquo;t even know what to comment about the second sentence. It&rsquo;s nearly inscrutable and nearly comprehensible. It&rsquo;s perfect. Thank you, AI. 100%</p>
<p><hr></p>
<div class="footnote-reference"><span id="footnote_DRAFTABLE_ENTRY_4293_1_body" class="footnote-number">[1]</span> I&rsquo;m only half-kidding. The <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=4195">previous issue</a> featured a book called &ldquo;Precious Amber&rdquo;, which was more than a little suspect.</div>      </div>
      </div>
        <div class="footer">
    <div class="footer-data"><div class="footer-links"><ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/contact.php" title="">Contact</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/support.php" title="">Support</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/privacy.php" title="">Privacy</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/rights.php" title="">Rights</a></li></ul></div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="copyright">Copyright (c) 1999-2026 earthli.com. All Rights Reserved.</div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="versions">Powered by <ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore/app_news.php">earthli News 3.7</a></li><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore" title="">earthli WebCore&trade; 3.7</a></li></ul></div></div>    </div>
      </div>
  </div>  </body>
</html>
]]>
  </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
      <title type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[Kindle Books Written by AIs Vol.2021.2]]>
  </title>
    <id>https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=4226</id>
    <link href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=4226"/>
    <updated>2021-06-24T22:45:36+02:00</updated>
    <author>
        <name type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[Marco von Ballmoos]]>
  </name>
      <uri>https://earthli.com/users/marco</uri>
    </author>
      <summary type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<p>This is the latest roundup of book titles that my Kindle shows me when I&rsquo;m not reading it. Long ago, I considered paying to turn off this advertising, but it&rsquo;s proven to be so entertaining that I&rsquo;m happy I never gave in and did it. This is a view into what people are reading or what Amazon would... [<a class="complete-text-link" href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=4226">More</a>]</p>
]]>
  </summary>
      <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<html lang="en">
  <head>
    <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/themes/ice.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/fonts/raleway.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/core/medium.css">
  </head>
  <body>
<div class="style-controls">  <div class="page">
    <div class="page-body">
<div class="info-box-top">
<p>
Published by <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_user.php?name=marco" title="Marco von Ballmoos" class="visible">marco</a> on <span class="date-time">24. Jun 2021 22:45:36 (GMT-5)</span>
</p>
</div>
      <div class="text-flow wide">
  <p>This is the latest roundup of book titles that my Kindle shows me when I&rsquo;m not reading it. Long ago, I considered paying to turn off this advertising, but it&rsquo;s proven to be so entertaining that I&rsquo;m happy I never gave in and did it. This is a view into what people are reading or what Amazon would like people to be reading or … whatever. I simply observe and catalog. I also sometimes have to hide my Kindle in public places so that no-one calls the police for what they think I&rsquo;m reading. [1]</p>
<h2>Chunkee Munkee: Volume 2</h2><p><span style="width: 360px; display: table"><span class="auto-content-inline"><a href="https://www.earthli.com/data/news/attachments/entry/4226/img_0281.jpeg"><img src="https://www.earthli.com/data/news/attachments/entry/4226/img_0281.jpeg" alt=" " style="width: 360px"></a></span><span class="auto-content-caption"><a href="https://www.earthli.com/data/news/attachments/entry/4226/img_0281.jpeg">Chunkee Munkee Volume 2</a></span></span></p>
<p>I don&rsquo;t know what I missed in volume 1, but this volume promises,</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;A look into a dysfunctional lifestyle that is of yourself or someone you know. Gain insight and be entertained in this fascinating book. Humor also.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>I assume that the misspelling in the title is significant, but the kerning of the double &ldquo;Es&rdquo; in a seemingly different font feels significant. Only the author &ldquo;Madame Ex&rdquo; knows, unless I take the opportunity to <em>find out more</em>.</p>
<p>I was tickled to see that the AI was worried that <span class="quote-inline">&ldquo;gain[ing] insight&rdquo;</span>, <span class="quote-inline">&ldquo;be[ing] entertained&rdquo;</span> and <span class="quote-inline">&ldquo;fascinat[ed]&rdquo;</span> weren&rsquo;t enough, so it threw in <span class="quote-inline">&ldquo;Humor also&rdquo;</span> at the end, just to round up the more tenacious fence-sitters.</p>
<p>I can&rsquo;t quite figure out the cover photo, though I think it might be a plant? But it kind of looks like a mouth? It&rsquo;s…unsettling.</p>
<h2>She&rsquo;s the One</h2><p><span style="width: 360px; display: table"><span class="auto-content-inline"><a href="https://www.earthli.com/data/news/attachments/entry/4226/she_s_the_one.jpeg"><img src="https://www.earthli.com/data/news/attachments/entry/4226/she_s_the_one.jpeg" alt=" " style="width: 360px"></a></span><span class="auto-content-caption"><a href="https://www.earthli.com/data/news/attachments/entry/4226/she_s_the_one.jpeg">She&#039;s the One</a></span></span></p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Can this tenderhearted 13th-century woman raise a baby, placate an absent military husband, and help her sister save her homeland?&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>First off: impeccable grammar and editing. This AI is definitely better at camouflage than those that came before it. The hyphen and the Oxford comma are noted and appreciated.</p>
<p>Is the title of the book &ldquo;She&rsquo;s the One Who Cares Too Much&rdquo;? Or is it &ldquo;&rdquo;She&rsquo;s the One&rdquo;? Or is it &ldquo;She&rsquo;s the One: Who Cares Too Much&rdquo;? Or what about &ldquo;She&rsquo;s the One: Who Cares? Too Much?&rdquo;?</p>
<p>Please note that this is, tantalizingly, the <em>second</em> book in the well-known and easily remembered series &ldquo;The War Stories of the Seven Troublesome Sisters&rdquo;. It is a bit suspicious that there are no reviews of this book, though.</p>
<h2>Perfect Game</h2><p><span style="width: 360px; display: table"><span class="auto-content-inline"><a href="https://www.earthli.com/data/news/attachments/entry/4226/perfect_game.jpeg"><img src="https://www.earthli.com/data/news/attachments/entry/4226/perfect_game.jpeg" alt=" " style="width: 360px"></a></span><span class="auto-content-caption"><a href="https://www.earthli.com/data/news/attachments/entry/4226/perfect_game.jpeg">Perfect Game</a></span></span></p>
<p>This is a <em>box set</em>, so it&rsquo;s three books in one! A bargain! They know it&rsquo;s junk, but people can&rsquo;t resist a bargain, so getting 3x junk for the same price is irresistable.</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Three men committed to bachelorhood… Three women determined to change everything.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>This one is refreshing in that it is absolutely unabashed about the relatively obvious fact that all three books are pretty much the same. The three books included in this collection are <em>Catching Caden</em>, <em>Benching Brady</em>, and <em>Stealing Sawyer</em>. This AI author seems to have hit on a winning formula, though: 394 perfect, 5-star reviews!</p>
<p>The books probably aren&rsquo;t <em>exactly</em> the same. They feature a different cover model and probably each have unique vocabulary for describing throbbing members and how they&rsquo;re wielded. The readers of these kinds of books are about as discriminating as people who order <em>Back Door Babes XIV</em>. They know what they&rsquo;re getting; they know it&rsquo;s the same thing as the first 13 times; they don&rsquo;t care; that&rsquo;s the way they like it.</p>
<h2>Famously in Love</h2><p><span style="width: 360px; display: table"><span class="auto-content-inline"><a href="https://www.earthli.com/data/news/attachments/entry/4226/famously_in_love.jpeg"><img src="https://www.earthli.com/data/news/attachments/entry/4226/famously_in_love.jpeg" alt=" " style="width: 360px"></a></span><span class="auto-content-caption"><a href="https://www.earthli.com/data/news/attachments/entry/4226/famously_in_love.jpeg">Famously In Love</a></span></span></p>
<p>How do you avoid paying too much for your book cover? Use models in silhouette. They splashed out for <em>two fonts</em> for the title, though.</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;A family oriented heartthrob. A driven nanny and dancer. Theirs is a sweet romance with touches of unexpected Hollywood turbulence.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>I only noticed this one because the author&rsquo;s last name is &ldquo;Chien&rdquo;, which means &ldquo;dog&rdquo; in French. No hyphen in <span class="quote-inline">&ldquo;family oriented&rdquo;</span>, sentences without verbs…I think this one is definitely an AI, lurking as an author.</p>
<h2>The Pimple in My Dimple</h2><p><span style="width: 360px; display: table"><span class="auto-content-inline"><a href="https://www.earthli.com/data/news/attachments/entry/4226/the_pimple_in_my_dimple.jpeg"><img src="https://www.earthli.com/data/news/attachments/entry/4226/the_pimple_in_my_dimple.jpeg" alt=" " style="width: 360px"></a></span><span class="auto-content-caption"><a href="https://www.earthli.com/data/news/attachments/entry/4226/the_pimple_in_my_dimple.jpeg">The Pimple in my Dimple</a></span></span></p>
<p>This one is refreshingly not a romance/softcore-porn novel. Either that or it&rsquo;s very niche and even more disturbing than it appears at first.</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;You may be unfamiliar with this antisocial genre. It&rsquo;s called Cringe Poetry, and it is not for the easily offended or distressed.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>I don&rsquo;t think this is an AI. I think this is a teenager challenging readers to be cool enough to get and pretend to like the almost certainly awful &ldquo;humor&rdquo;. It <em>might</em> be an AI because the name &ldquo;Belf&rdquo; is unique, in my experience.</p>
<p><hr></p>
<div class="footnote-reference"><span id="footnote_DRAFTABLE_ENTRY_4226_1_body" class="footnote-number">[1]</span> I&rsquo;m only half-kidding. The <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=4195">previous issue</a> featured a book called &ldquo;Precious Amber&rdquo;, which was more than a little suspect.</div>      </div>
      </div>
        <div class="footer">
    <div class="footer-data"><div class="footer-links"><ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/contact.php" title="">Contact</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/support.php" title="">Support</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/privacy.php" title="">Privacy</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/rights.php" title="">Rights</a></li></ul></div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="copyright">Copyright (c) 1999-2026 earthli.com. All Rights Reserved.</div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="versions">Powered by <ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore/app_news.php">earthli News 3.7</a></li><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore" title="">earthli WebCore&trade; 3.7</a></li></ul></div></div>    </div>
      </div>
  </div>  </body>
</html>
]]>
  </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
      <title type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[Arsène Lupin, gentleman-cambrioleur  by Maurice Leblanc (1907; fr) (read in 2021)]]>
  </title>
    <id>https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=4159</id>
    <link href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=4159"/>
    <updated>2021-04-18T12:57:45+02:00</updated>
    <author>
        <name type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[Marco von Ballmoos]]>
  </name>
      <uri>https://earthli.com/users/marco</uri>
    </author>
      <summary type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<blockquote class="quote abstract "><div>Disclaimer: these are notes I took while reading this book. They include citations I found interesting or enlightening or particularly well-written. In some cases, I&rsquo;ve pointed out which of these applies to which citation; in others, I have not. Any benefit you gain from reading these notes is... [<a class="complete-text-link" href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=4159">More</a>]</div></blockquote>]]>
  </summary>
      <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<html lang="en">
  <head>
    <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/themes/ice.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/fonts/raleway.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/core/medium.css">
  </head>
  <body>
<div class="style-controls">  <div class="page">
    <div class="page-body">
<div class="info-box-top">
<p>
Published by <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_user.php?name=marco" title="Marco von Ballmoos" class="visible">marco</a> on <span class="date-time">18. Apr 2021 12:57:45 (GMT-5)</span>
</p>
<p>
Updated by <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_user.php?name=marco" title="Marco von Ballmoos" class="visible">marco</a> on <span class="date-time">2. Jan 2022 21:38:47 (GMT-5)</span>
</p>
</div>
      <div class="text-flow wide">
  <blockquote class="quote abstract "><div>Disclaimer: these are notes I took while reading this book. They include citations I found interesting or enlightening or particularly well-written. In some cases, I&rsquo;ve pointed out which of these applies to which citation; in others, I have not. Any benefit you gain from reading these notes is purely incidental to the purpose they serve of reminding me what I once read. Please see Wikipedia for a summary if I&rsquo;ve failed to provide one sufficient for your purposes. If my notes serve to trigger an interest in this book, then I&rsquo;m happy for you.</div></blockquote><p>This is a collection of short stories about the adventures of Arsène Lupin, a gentleman thief.</p>
<dl><dt class="field">L&rsquo;Arrestation d&rsquo;Arsène Lupin</dt>
<dd><div class=" "><p>This story finds Lupin on a transatlantic voyage to New York City. He is hiding in plain sight as a passenger. A telegram arrives announcing that Arsène Lupin is on board, but disguised, with blond hair and a last name starting with R…the telegram cuts the rest off. The remaining few days of the voyage are tense, with passengers interrogating all passengers who might match the description.</p>
<p>The investigation is led by Bernard d&rsquo;Andrèzy and Miss Nelly, between whom romantic sparks flare. They eliminate all of the possibilities, especially when a daring burglary happens while none of the suspects could have done it. A large number of jewels and tens of thousands of francs have gone missing.</p>
<p>Lupin&rsquo;s chief adversary inspector Ganimard is waiting at the dock and checks all of the passengers, until he gets to Andrèzy, who turns out that have been Lupin all along. Deeply disappointed, Nelly walks off the boat with Andrèzy&rsquo;s camera—which he&rsquo;d just handed her and in which he&rsquo;d hidden the jewels and francs—before Ganimard arrests him. He watches her thrown the camera into the water near the dock as she walks away, and he is taken into custody.</p>
</div></dd>
<dt class="field">Arsène Lupin en prison</dt>
<dd><div class=" "><p>This story starts with Lupin in prison at La Santé. He writes a letter to Baron Nathan Cahorn, a reclusive and wealthy owner of many historical artifacts living in a well-fortified castle. Lupin describes the man&rsquo;s possessions in detail, indicating what he will steal and when. Cahorn is ruffled and seeks help from Inspector Ganimard—who just happens to be vacationing in town.</p>
<p>Ganimard is, at first, not interested—he is on vacation, after all—but is convinced to help for a large enough sum of money. He regales Cahorn with tales of Lupin&rsquo;s cleverness, and reassures Cahorn that he will bring two men along for backup. He investigates Cahorn&rsquo;s castle and finds the Lupin&rsquo;s likely ingress will be through the extensive and infamous tunnel complex under it. On the day of the crime, Ganimard shows up with his two helpers and they position themselves on the floor with the treasures, while Ganimard and Cahorn take up guard at the egress of the tunnels, inside the castle.</p>
<p>They wait all night, with Ganimard snoring away as an increasingly relieved Cahorn waits the night through. In the morning, with no sign of Lupin, they go upstairs to find both men unconscious and the treasures gone. They are flummoxed. Ganimard begs Cahorn not to mention his having slept through the heist, in order to avoid being embarrassed by the tale of how a thief who was supposed to have been in prison pilfered right under this nose.</p>
<p>Later, as an expert on Lupin, Ganimard is called in to head up the case. He and his team investigate the whole castle, only to find that the tunnels under the castle lead nowhere. There is no way Lupin came in through them. Ganimard visits Lupin in prison, where he learns that he&rsquo;d broken out of and back into prison in order to spend the night with Cahorn <em>as Ganimard himself</em>, letting his accomplices make off with the treasure before drugging themselves to make it appear as if they&rsquo;d been taken by surprise by Lupin himself. Lupin tells Ganimard he&rsquo;d only been able to arrest him because he&rsquo;d been distracted by love. He prefers to stay in prison (for now) because it&rsquo;s a good alibi, but he declares that he won&rsquo;t participate in his own trial.</p>
</div></dd>
<dt class="field">L&rsquo;Évasion d&rsquo;Arsène Lupin</dt>
<dd><div class=" "><p>This story tells of Lupin&rsquo;s trial and his final escape from prison. Lupin plans an initial escape while he&rsquo;s in a police transport—but the police have set him up in order for him to lead them to his accomplices. Instead of doing this, he stops at a café, gets some cigarettes and something to drink, then tells the adoring customers and waitstaff that he is Arsène Lupin and that he is, in fact, in the middle of an escape and thus a bit short on funds, after which they, laughing, wave him on his way.</p>
<p>Lupin makes his way to a police post and turns himself in, knowing that the &ldquo;escape&rdquo; was a setup. Before the trial, Lupin spends most of his time on his bed, turned away from the world, and seems to grow increasingly despondent. He is a changed man at trial: noticeably thinner, bent, no longer smiling, looking creased and old, almost broken.</p>
<p>Ganimard is suspicious—remembering what Lupin had told him about not participating in his own trial–and examines him closely, declaring him to be an imposter. The judge is perplexed, realizing that the actual prisoner has been gone for two months. They ask the prisoner, who&rsquo;s a known alcoholic, why he&rsquo;d accepted the fate to which Lupin had consigned him. He answers that he&rsquo;d enjoyed the regular meals. They release him. He spends some time wandering around Paris, eventually ending up in the <em>Bois du Bologne</em>, tailed by Ganimard.</p>
<p>Ganimard eventually confronts him and looks into his eyes again. This time, he sees the mischievous twinkle of his old enemy in the man&rsquo;s eyes and realizes he&rsquo;s been hoodwinked <em>again</em>. Lupin had spent the two months fasting and changing his appearance and demeanor in order to fool the court. That it was Ganimard who&rsquo;d provided the &ldquo;proof&rdquo; was just icing on the cake. He absconds from Ganimard again, who accepts defeat.</p>
</div></dd>
<dt class="field">Le Mystérieux Voyageur</dt>
<dd><div class=" "><p>This story finds our narrator on a train, where he is forced from his chosen cabin by a rowdy group of smoking men and finds refuge in an 8-person cabin occupied by a young woman, who he sees bidding her husband adieu. They are joined by a stranger, who promptly falls asleep, hat over his face. The young lady is agitated and relates to our narrator that she is <em>certain</em> that Arsène Lupin is on board, as well.</p>
<p>The narrator <em>is</em> Lupin and he falls asleep—despite the lady&rsquo;s warning that he should stay awake to keep an eye on their suspicious companion. He dreams vividly and awakens with the man at his throat, stealing all of his papers and effects, and tying him up before absconding into the tunnel—where the train is forced to slow down in a tight curve—just before the station. At the station, Lupin exits the train and, with the help of the likewise-robbed woman, tells the police what happened—and then essentially takes over the investigation.</p>
<p>No-one knows what Lupin looks like, so they&rsquo;re none the wiser. He offers to drive two officers to the another town (Bucy), to which they know the suspect is headed on another train. He sees Lupin coming and drops off the train again, just before the station, scaling a rock wall and absconding into a local forest. Lupin stations the officers outside the forest and plunges in, easily following the man&rsquo;s trail through a dense and fragile underbrush. He happens upon him and subdues him with <em>kung fu</em>, recognizing him as a wanted criminal.</p>
<p>Lupin gets his papers back, as well as the lady&rsquo;s effects and jewels, ensuring that they are returned to her and that his two constable compatriots are handsomely rewarded for helping him. The paper the next day tells of Lupin&rsquo;s heroism, having finally untangled the story enough to realize that, once again, they&rsquo;d been hoodwinked.</p>
</div></dd>
<dt class="field">Le Collier de la reine</dt>
<dd><div class=" "><p>This story is ostensibly the one on which the <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/app]view_article.php?id=4138">first season of the Netflix series</a> was <em>very</em> loosely based. It is, in a way, the origin story of Arsène Lupin. We learn of a certain Count and Madame Dedreux, who possess the wonderful necklace. We learn also of how she keeps the necklace in a safe in their bedroom, that the room is bolted and that the only window is locked, and to which no-one else has access.</p>
<p>We learn of how, one night, they are robbed of the necklace, with no trace of how the crime was done. They suspect the miserable chamber-maid Henriette, whom they&rsquo;d quartered on the floor below them with her six-year-old son. She&rsquo;s left the building but four times in the last several years and can hardly be suspected, though the police question her closely.</p>
<p>Many years later, Henriette has been let go and lives alone. She starts to receive a generous yearly check from an address in Paris—right up until she dies a few years later. Years after that, we meet the DeDreux family again, diminished in reputation, the loss of the necklace having dealt them a blow from which they never quite recovered.</p>
<p>They are visited by a man they&rsquo;ve known for a while, a Monsieur Floriani. Over tea and coffee, he regales them with a tale of how the crime could have been committed, eliciting details that had escaped the police so many years ago. He supposes a certain construction in the window that the count denies, but then finds to his astonishment is <em>true</em>.</p>
<p>Floriani continues to fill in detail about how someone small enough could have picked the window lock, come through, and absconded on a jury-rigged platform in a tiny corridor outside. He fills in enough detail until there can be no doubt: he is the grown son of Henriette and he had absconded with the necklace at six years old, taken to cheer up his despondent and long-suffering mother.</p>
<p>They do nothing, as what can be done so many years later? The countess notes that, even if the stones are gone, it is the setting that is the truly precious part of the crown. Four years later, it is returned to her, an act of generosity for which Arsène Lupin takes credit. The implication is that Lupin is Floriani.</p>
</div></dd>
<dt class="field">Le Sept de cœur</dt>
<dd><div class=" "><p>This story tells of how the narrator met Arsène Lupin. He had spent an evening with Jean Daspry. The story begins with a late-night home invasion during which dozens of men invade the narrator&rsquo;s home, but seemingly take nothing. The leader of the group bids him stay silent and not take up his revolver from his night table. Terrified into inaction, the narrator complies. Once they&rsquo;ve left, the only clue that anyone had been there is a playing card—the seven of hearts.</p>
<p>With time, the narrator comes to see that bizarre evening as nothing more than a fantasy, while his colleague Daspry, a police detective, continues to try to crack the case, but without much success. One morning the narrator is visited by a stranger, about 40 years old, who does not identify himself. The man tells him that he has read his story and wants to verify it. To do so, he asks that he be allowed to spend three minutes alone in the room where the card was found. After three minutes, the narrator hears a shot and rushes in to find the man has killed himself with a pistol to the temple. Two steps away from him lies another playing card—once again, the seven of hearts.</p>
<p>The police arrive and discover the man is clutching the business card of a certain George Andermatt But it&rsquo;s not the man himself. They call Andermatt and he arrives twenty minutes later. He tells them that the suicide is one of two brothers Varin, from Lausanne. He knows the man&rsquo;s brother Alfred much better. He tells them of their interest in the plans for a super-secret submarine designed by Louis Lacombe with the code name <em>Le Sept-de-coeur</em>. They had obtained the plans for it, but a crucial part was missing. They would only be able to build a poor facsimile of it.</p>
<p>The narrator and Daspry are next visited by Mme. Andermatt, whose letters to a lover had been intercepted. She is being blackmailed, presumably by a certain Salvator. They suggest that she engage him and try to lure him into a trap.</p>
<p>Alfred&rsquo;s brother Étienne is still searching for the missing chapter of the plans. But there is someone else, someone who is agitating against them, someone who pushed Alfred to suicide: Salvator is suspected. He knows of the letters from Mme. Andermatt to Lacombe that she would rather her husband not read. He writes to Andermatt to meet him at the room where Alfred had shot himself. He had also written to Étienne that Andermatt wanted to meet and make a deal.</p>
<p>Mme. Andermatt caught sight of the letter to her husband and told the narrator, who informed Daspry. They all three of them go to the room before the appointed time and hide themselves behind the curtains, in front of one of the large windows. They watch the initial meeting and see that Étienne is growing agitated and wants to leave. He pulls a gun on Andermatt. Daspry shoots the gun from his hand and jumps out, revealing himself to be Salvator—he who arranged both sides of the meeting.</p>
<p>With a much more commanding presence than our narrator had heretofore known him to have, Daspry arranges them to buy each other&rsquo;s papers—Andermatt getting his wife&rsquo;s letters and Étienne getting the final page of the plans. He uses the key he&rsquo;d found in the garden to manipulate a painting in the room to open the safe behind it and obtain the desired goods.</p>
<p>Instead of handing over the plans, Salvator fools Étienne into handing over his payment with nothing in return. Andermatt also pays, but gets the letters—but fake letters that reveal nothing of the hinted-at affair with Lacombe. The plans are safe, once again and Salvator has been handsomely recompensed by Étienne and Andermatt—though not necessarily willingly.</p>
<p>When the narrator presses, Daspry reveals himself to be none other than Arsène Lupin. The very first entrance to the home—where the narrator had thought nothing had been stolen—was when Lupin found and cracked the safe the first time, absconding at the time with many of the jewels therein (a second safe, actually), but also hatching his plan for this secondary coup, once again doing a bit of good in securing the plans for the secret sub from potential terrorists.</p>
</div></dd>
<dt class="field">Le Coffre-fort de madame Imbert</dt>
<dd><div class=" "><p>This story is different than the preceding ones, in that Arsène Lupin was known from the very beginning. He saves a certain Monsier Imbert from a robbery at the very beginning of the story. The man invites him to lunch and offers him a FF20,000 reward, that he refuses. Instead, they become friends and the man wants him to meet his wife, the heiress Mme. Imbert. Some time later, Lupin meets with his accomplice—the man who&rsquo;d tried to &ldquo;rob&rdquo; Imbert. Lupin tells him to be patient—that they will soon have the contents of Mme. Imbert&rsquo;s impenetrable safe, in which she keeps her fortune comprising papers and deeds in value of at least 100M francs.</p>
<p>Imbert and his wife are perfectly nice people and offer Lupin a job after he confesses that he is destitute. They invite him to live with them as their secretary, but there is really no work to do. He lives above them, paid for his sinecure, and biding his time. He installs a tubular device that he snakes down from his room to the Imberts&rsquo; office and with which he can spy on them as they interact with the safe. He divines the combination and is finally ready.</p>
<p>Late one night, he waits for Mme. Imbert to leave the office and for her husband to follow. Lupin slithers down on a rope ladder to just outside the window, opening it surreptitiously, but forced to wait until M. Imbert leaves. He does not, so Lupin swings in, envelops him in the curtains and uses karate blows to render the man senseless. Lupin absconds with the contents of the safe, returning to his room. Afterwards, the Imberts leave town, having collected their insurance money.</p>
<p>Later, he recounts the story to his narrator as his greatest folly—all of the papers were fake! The Imberts were basically destitute. He should have taken the FF20,000 when it was offered, but he&rsquo;d turned it down. Lupin ruefully admits that he&rsquo;d never been played quite so well as then. The Imberts had used him to convert their fake fortune into insurance money.</p>
</div></dd>
<dt class="field">La Perle noire</dt>
<dd><div class=" "><p>This story is also very up-front about who Arsène Lupin is. He enters a building late one night, pretending to look for a doctor. Instead, he runs up to the fifth floor and does something else: he is casing an apartment of an older lady, living in very modest circumstances, but who has the Black Pearl.</p>
<p>Lupin cases the apartment and returns one night to take the Black Pearl. He feels his way around in the dark, toward the hiding place where he&rsquo;s seen her put it, but comes across something soft in the dark: a cold foot. It&rsquo;s her foot. She&rsquo;s dead, on the floor. He lights his lamp and sees that she&rsquo;s been bloodied and that the Pearl is gone. He&rsquo;s shocked and sits down to think.</p>
<p>We learn later that the police suspect a counselor of hers, who&rsquo;d just started working for her recently. She had two other servants, but they&rsquo;d been with her for twenty years and were beyond suspicion. The counselor, on the other hand, seemed to have access, but it was a mystery how he&rsquo;d managed to leave and close the door behind him—and they had found neither the knife nor the key.</p>
<p>After a long trial, the counselor is found not guilty for lack of evidence and is let go. His name is ruined and he lives by small means in a tiny apartment under a new name. One day, at lunch, a man sits down opposite him and begins to tell him what happened that night. He tells the counselor of how he&rsquo;d killed the woman and taken the Black Pearl. The stranger knew everything about the night as if he&rsquo;d been there—which he had, as it was none other than Arsène Lupin who&rsquo;d found him.</p>
<p>Arsène makes him reveal where the Black Pearl is hidden and finds it buried in the sand between two paving stones. He regales his narrator with this tale, noting that he has the real Pearl, though &ldquo;copies&rdquo; have been found in cities around the world. Once again, Lupin earns kudos in the newspapers for bringing a killer to justice, but keeps the plunder for himself.</p>
</div></dd>
<dt class="field">Sherlock Holmès arrive trop tard</dt>
<dd><div class=" "><p>This story ties a lot of the other stuff together. In it, Lupin has inveigled himself into a position near Devanne, the owner of another castle, similar to the one owned by Cahorn in the story <em>Arsène Lupin en prison</em>. He poses as the man&rsquo;s friend Velmont. They even make a joking reference to it, wondering whether Lupin could penetrate Devanne&rsquo;s castle. Devanne even makes a reference to how very much like Lupin his friend Horace Velmont looks. The gentlemen discuss the arrival of Herlock Sholmès, who will grace them with his presence and acumen and hopefully prevent any crime.</p>
<p>They also joke about Velmont perhaps stealing all of Devanne&rsquo;s things in the night. Devanne tells the story of how he&rsquo;d discovered some secrets about his castle—about a secret entryway. But he&rsquo;d never figured out anything from the clues. He recites all of the information he has and they all agree that it&rsquo;s a mystery (including Lupin). A few days before, one of the books containing important information had been stolen.</p>
<p>That night, in the depth of the early morning, Lupin and his men make use of the secret passage to which he&rsquo;s discovered the combination and make off with all of the most expensive and valuable furniture and artwork. Lupin himself empties the glass case containing jewelry and watches and other small, but highly valuable art. Pockets stuffed, he turns and realizes that he&rsquo;s been discovered by Nelly, the young lady from the first story (<em>L’Arrestation d’Arsène Lupin</em>), who&rsquo;d turned him in to Ganimard and for whom he&rsquo;d fallen rather hard. Once again, it is impossible for Lupin to resist her allures and he promises that he&rsquo;s a man of honor and will return everything the next afternoon at 3PM.</p>
<p>While she is checking for footsteps that she thought she&rsquo;d heard, he disappears. The next day, they meet again at a garden party of Devanne&rsquo;s, with soldiers and police milling about everywhere, still investigating the crime. Devanne is amazed that Lupin pulled it off—but he&rsquo;s still not entirely convinced that his friend Velmont really is Lupin.</p>
<p>Nelly and Lupin meet in a secluded part of the garden where Velmont tells her that he kept his promise. She is torn, but ends up walking away after seeing Devanne&rsquo;s ruby ring on Lupin&rsquo;s finger—he couldn&rsquo;t resist keeping something—and realizing that he is, at heart, a thief. Lupin leaves soon after, heading to the railroad station, where he meets Herlock on the way. They size each other up, dive into a copse together to avoid a careening stagecoach, and soon are on their respective ways.</p>
<p>Herlock meets Devanne and begins to investigate, receiving the clues and making quick work of them—what Devanne couldn&rsquo;t do in ten years, Sholmès does in ten minutes. Just as Lupin had before him. They find the secret passageway, turning letters in the name of the castle that turn out to be levers. They head down the passage and end up at the ruined chapel several hundred meters from the castle.</p>
<p>Devanne&rsquo;s car awaits them there. Devanne had not called for it, but the chauffeur says that Velmont had told him to go to the chapel to pick up Devanne and his friend. Lupin divined that Herlock would solve the puzzle as well. They drive to the train station where they inquire about Lupin, but are only told that Sholmès has a box awaiting him. He opens it to find his own watch, which he only realizes at that moment is no longer in his pocket. Lupin had stolen it off of him when they&rsquo;d met in the forest. Devanne is dying of laughter and Herlock, though initially admiring of Lupin&rsquo;s acumen, intelligence, and daring, is now quite pissed off, swearing that they will meet again.</p>
</div></dd>
</dl><h2>Citations</h2><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Ce fut vainement. On ne découvrit pas le moindre vestige de souterrain. Il n&rsquo;existait point de passage secret. Soit, répondait-on de tous côtés, mais des meubles et des tableaux ne s&rsquo;évanouissent pas comme des fantômes. Cela s&rsquo;en va par des portes et par des fenêtres, et les gens qui s&rsquo;en emparent, s&rsquo;introduisent et s&rsquo;en vont également par des portes et des fenêtres. Quels sont ces gens? Comment se sont-ils introduits? Et comment s&rsquo;en sont-ils allés? Le parquet de Rouen, convaincu de son impuissance, sollicita le secours d&rsquo;agents parisiens. M. Dudouis, le chef de la Sûreté, envoya ses meilleurs limiers de la brigade de fer. Lui-même fit un séjour de quarante-huit heures au Malaquis. Il ne réussit pas davantage. C&rsquo;est alors qu&rsquo;il manda l&rsquo;inspecteur principal Ganimard&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 30</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;—Ah! ça, mon cher, vous imaginez-vous que je vais pourrir sur la paille humide? Vous m&rsquo;outragez. Arsène Lupin ne reste en prison que le temps qu&rsquo;il lui plaît, et pas une minute de plus.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 37</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Ganimard se taisait. Cette évasion dont il se jugeait responsable—n&rsquo;était-ce pas lui qui, par sa déposition sensationnelle, avait induit la justice en erreur?—cette évasion lui semblait la honte de sa carrière. Une larme roula vers sa moustache grise.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 55</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;—Oh! point n&rsquo;est besoin d&rsquo;être sorcier. Il suffit, comme l&rsquo;a dit ce brave président, de se préparer pendant une douzaine d&rsquo;années pour être prêt à toutes les éventualités.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 55</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Le système Bertillon comporte d&rsquo;abord le signalement visuel—et vous voyez qu&rsquo;il n&rsquo;est pas infaillible—et ensuite le signalement par mesures, mesure de la tête, des doigts, des oreilles, etc. Là-contre rien à faire.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 58</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Du moins, plus exactement, je retrouvais en moi la sorte de souvenir que laisse la vision d&rsquo;un portrait plusieurs fois aperçu et dont on n&rsquo;a jamais contemplé l&rsquo;original. Et, en même temps, je sentais l&rsquo;inutilité de tout effort de mémoire, tellement ce souvenir était inconsistant et vague.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 60</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Et il accomplit cette besogne de la façon la plus naturelle du monde, avec une aisance où se révélait le savoir d&rsquo;un maître, d&rsquo;un professionnel du vol et du crime. Pas un mot, pas un mouvement fébrile. Du sang-froid et de l&rsquo;audace. Et j&rsquo;étais là, sur la banquette, ficelé comme une momie, moi, Arsène Lupin!&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 63</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Et libre, hors de danger, je n&rsquo;avais plus maintenant qu&rsquo;à régler mes petites affaires personnelles, avec le concours des deux honnêtes représentants de la force publique. Arsène Lupin s&rsquo;en allait à la recherche d&rsquo;Arsène Lupin!&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 70</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Voilà tout. Une carte et une lettre trouvée dans un livre. En dehors de cela, rien. Était-ce assez pour affirmer que je n&rsquo;avais pas été le jouet d&rsquo;un rêve?&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 96</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;«On va procéder en présence de l&rsquo;empereur, et dans un lieu que l&rsquo;on tiendra secret jusqu&rsquo;à la dernière minute, aux premiers essais d&rsquo;un sous-marin qui doit révolutionner les conditions futures de la guerre navale. Une indiscrétion nous en a révélé le nom: il s&rsquo;appelle Le Sept-de-cœur.»&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 100</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Le soir, les journaux étalés sur ma table, nous discutions l&rsquo;affaire et l&rsquo;examinions sous toutes ses faces avec cette irritation que l&rsquo;on éprouverait à marcher indéfiniment dans l&rsquo;ombre et à toujours se heurter aux mêmes obstacles.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 103</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Les premières recherches ne fournirent point d&rsquo;indice. Les fenêtres n&rsquo;ayant pas été brisées ni les portes fracturées, sans nul doute le déménagement s&rsquo;était effectué par l&rsquo;issue secrète. Pourtant, sur le tapis, aucune trace de pas, sur les murs, aucune marque insolite.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 160</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Il y eut dans sa voix une nuance imperceptible d&rsquo;ironie qu&rsquo;il regretta aussitôt, car Herlock Sholmès le considéra des pieds à la tête, et d&rsquo;un œil à la fois si enveloppant et si aigu, qu&rsquo;Arsène Lupin eut l&rsquo;impression d&rsquo;être saisi, emprisonné, enregistré par ce regard, plus exactement et plus essentiellement qu&rsquo;il ne l&rsquo;avait jamais été par aucun appareil photographique.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 164</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Pour mémoire, le roi écrivit: 2-6-12, c&rsquo;est-à-dire, H. R. L., la deuxième, la sixième et la douzième lettre du mot.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 169</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Sholmès sourit. —Monsieur Devanne, tout le monde n&rsquo;est pas apte à déchiffrer les énigmes. —Mais voilà dix ans que je cherche. Et vous, en dix minutes… —Bah! l&rsquo;habitude…&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 171</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;—Aoh! dit-il, en accompagnant cette exclamation d&rsquo;un geste de colère… —Une montre, fit Devanne, est-ce que par hasard?… L&rsquo;Anglais ne répondit pas. —Comment! c&rsquo;est votre montre! Arsène Lupin vous renvoie votre montre! Mais s&rsquo;il vous la renvoie, c&rsquo;est qu&rsquo;il l&rsquo;avait prise… Il avait pris votre montre! Ah! elle est bonne, celle-là, la montre de Herlock Sholmès subtilisée par Arsène Lupin! Dieu, que c&rsquo;est drôle! Non, vrai… vous m&rsquo;excuserez… mais c&rsquo;est plus fort que moi. Il riait à gorge déployée, incapable de se contenir. Et quand il eut bien ri, il affirma, d&rsquo;un ton convaincu: —Oh! c&rsquo;est un homme, en effet.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 173</div></div>      </div>
      </div>
        <div class="footer">
    <div class="footer-data"><div class="footer-links"><ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/contact.php" title="">Contact</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/support.php" title="">Support</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/privacy.php" title="">Privacy</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/rights.php" title="">Rights</a></li></ul></div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="copyright">Copyright (c) 1999-2026 earthli.com. All Rights Reserved.</div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="versions">Powered by <ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore/app_news.php">earthli News 3.7</a></li><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore" title="">earthli WebCore&trade; 3.7</a></li></ul></div></div>    </div>
      </div>
  </div>  </body>
</html>
]]>
  </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
      <title type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[Kindle recommendations: 2021.1]]>
  </title>
    <id>https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=4195</id>
    <link href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=4195"/>
    <updated>2021-02-28T18:21:57+01:00</updated>
    <author>
        <name type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[Marco von Ballmoos]]>
  </name>
      <uri>https://earthli.com/users/marco</uri>
    </author>
      <summary type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<p>Since my Kindle regularly provides me with what I consider to be bizarre recommendations, I&rsquo;ll just name this series of posts about them.</p>
<p>Though these books aren&rsquo;t for me, I&rsquo;m honestly glad that people are reading books. I am a bit worried that they&rsquo;re reading books generated by an AI, but as long... [<a class="complete-text-link" href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=4195">More</a>]</p>
]]>
  </summary>
      <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<html lang="en">
  <head>
    <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/themes/ice.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/fonts/raleway.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/core/medium.css">
  </head>
  <body>
<div class="style-controls">  <div class="page">
    <div class="page-body">
<div class="info-box-top">
<p>
Published by <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_user.php?name=marco" title="Marco von Ballmoos" class="visible">marco</a> on <span class="date-time">28. Feb 2021 18:21:57 (GMT-5)</span>
</p>
</div>
      <div class="text-flow wide">
  <p>Since my Kindle regularly provides me with what I consider to be bizarre recommendations, I&rsquo;ll just name this series of posts about them.</p>
<p>Though these books aren&rsquo;t for me, I&rsquo;m honestly glad that people are reading books. I am a bit worried that they&rsquo;re reading books generated by an AI, but as long as they&rsquo;re happy…</p>
<p>As for these books? I feel like I&rsquo;m watching the awakening of an a digital mind, trained on and simultaneously stunted by the questionable quality of human literary achievement that is the Kindle Unlimited library. </p>
<h2>Opaque</h2><p><span style="width: 480px; display: table"><span class="auto-content-inline"><a href="https://www.earthli.com/data/news/attachments/entry/4195/amazon_kindle_-_opaque.jpeg"><img src="https://www.earthli.com/data/news/attachments/entry/4195/amazon_kindle_-_opaque.jpeg" alt=" " style="width: 480px"></a></span><span class="auto-content-caption"><a href="https://www.earthli.com/data/news/attachments/entry/4195/amazon_kindle_-_opaque.jpeg">The boss of fiction</a></span></span></p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Is Adam too intimidating for you? Or are you the boss of fiction?&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>I&rsquo;m classifying this one under AI-generated attempt by Amazon at getting me to buy content that they&rsquo;ve created on a server farm for a few pennies of processing power.</p>
<p>I obviously didn&rsquo;t click this one because I&rsquo;m not man enough to read something like that. I am absolutely not the boss of fiction, not even a lowly vice president.</p>
<h2>My Kindle thinks I&rsquo;m a child</h2><p><span style="width: 568px; display: table"><span class="auto-content-inline"><a href="https://www.earthli.com/data/news/attachments/entry/4195/ai_run_amuck_in_kindle_world.jpeg"><img src="https://www.earthli.com/data/news/attachments/entry/4195/ai_run_amuck_in_kindle_world.jpeg" alt=" " style="width: 568px"></a></span><span class="auto-content-caption"><a href="https://www.earthli.com/data/news/attachments/entry/4195/ai_run_amuck_in_kindle_world.jpeg">AI run amuck in Kindle world</a></span></span></p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Come along with Basil Drempt and Samuel Steiner as the kangaroo kickflip, DDT, and clothesline their way through the troublesome streets of Molasses.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>C&rsquo;mon, Amazon—this one has <em>obviously</em> been generated by <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GPT-3">GPT3</a> (<cite><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/">Wikipedia</a></cite>). There is no way that a human intelligence was involved. What kind of last name is &ldquo;Drempt&rdquo; anyway? Is it because the kid on the cover is &ldquo;dreaming&rdquo; so they took a misspelling of &ldquo;dreamt&rdquo; as his last name? The other seemingly nonsense terms are actual wrestling moves, but a town named &ldquo;Molasses&rdquo;? GTFOH.</p>
<h2>My Kindle thinks I&rsquo;m a teenage girl</h2><p><span style="width: 480px; display: table"><span class="auto-content-inline"><a href="https://www.earthli.com/data/news/attachments/entry/4195/my_kindle_things_i_m_a_teenage_girl.jpeg"><img src="https://www.earthli.com/data/news/attachments/entry/4195/my_kindle_things_i_m_a_teenage_girl.jpeg" alt=" " style="width: 480px"></a></span><span class="auto-content-caption"><a href="https://www.earthli.com/data/news/attachments/entry/4195/my_kindle_things_i_m_a_teenage_girl.jpeg">My Kindle things I&#039;m a teenage girl</a></span></span></p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;That summer you realize your best friend has gotten really hot.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>I&rsquo;m not sure which best friend they&rsquo;re referring to. They&rsquo;re both generically hot. I guessed by the author&rsquo;s classically female name (probably fake) that the intention was for me to sympathize with the girl who&rsquo;s discovered she might want to move someone out of the friend zone because his appearance has changed enough to make him fuckable instead </p>
<h2>My Kindle thinks I&rsquo;m bi</h2><p><span style="width: 480px; display: table"><span class="auto-content-inline"><a href="https://www.earthli.com/data/news/attachments/entry/4195/my_kindle_thinks_i_m_bi.jpeg"><img src="https://www.earthli.com/data/news/attachments/entry/4195/my_kindle_thinks_i_m_bi.jpeg" alt=" " style="width: 480px"></a></span><span class="auto-content-caption"><a href="https://www.earthli.com/data/news/attachments/entry/4195/my_kindle_thinks_i_m_bi.jpeg">My Kindle thinks I&#039;m bi</a></span></span></p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;I was hired to break his bad habits, but what if I&rsquo;m falling for Boston&rsquo;s notorious playboy?&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>Speaking of fuckable…this seems like a crossover hit with appeal for both the ladies and the gentlemen. While L.J. Shen has the firm hand and steely resolve to navigate the treacherous waters of a novel about a man who&rsquo;s so dumb he puts his tie on first, I just don&rsquo;t have time to read them all. </p>
<p>This is one of those covers that might be awkward to explain if you leave your Kindle on your towel at the pool and your macho friends aren&rsquo;t aware that you have no control over what it shows in &ldquo;sleep&rdquo; mode and just assume that it&rsquo;s the cover of what you&rsquo;re reading. If you have good friends, they won&rsquo;t judge and maybe even have a few good suggestions of their own.</p>
<h2>My Kindle thinks I&rsquo;m a pedophile</h2><p><span style="width: 544px; display: table"><span class="auto-content-inline"><a href="https://www.earthli.com/data/news/attachments/entry/4195/precious_amber_by_james_fuller.jpeg"><img src="https://www.earthli.com/data/news/attachments/entry/4195/precious_amber_by_james_fuller.jpeg" alt=" " style="width: 544px"></a></span><span class="auto-content-caption"><a href="https://www.earthli.com/data/news/attachments/entry/4195/precious_amber_by_james_fuller.jpeg">My Kindle thinks I&#039;m a pedophile</a></span></span></p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;A kidnapper with a perverse lust for manipulation, a girl abducted and locked away trying to remain strong, a police captain&rsquo;s race against the odds&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>Going back to the towel at the pool, I&rsquo;m not sure how you&rsquo;re going to wiggle out of this one. If someone is confronting you about this cover on your Kindle, they&rsquo;ve probably already called the police, just to be on the safe side. </p>
<p>No, no! You don&rsquo;t understand! My <em>Kindle</em> chose this! I have no control over it!</p>
<p>A likely story. Methinks though doth protest too much.</p>
<p>Please come this way sir. Welcome to the predator&rsquo;s list.</p>
      </div>
      </div>
        <div class="footer">
    <div class="footer-data"><div class="footer-links"><ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/contact.php" title="">Contact</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/support.php" title="">Support</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/privacy.php" title="">Privacy</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/rights.php" title="">Rights</a></li></ul></div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="copyright">Copyright (c) 1999-2026 earthli.com. All Rights Reserved.</div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="versions">Powered by <ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore/app_news.php">earthli News 3.7</a></li><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore" title="">earthli WebCore&trade; 3.7</a></li></ul></div></div>    </div>
      </div>
  </div>  </body>
</html>
]]>
  </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
      <title type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[Batman: A Death in the Family by Jim Starlin (1988) (read in 2020)]]>
  </title>
    <id>https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3910</id>
    <link href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3910"/>
    <updated>2021-01-11T22:01:16+01:00</updated>
    <author>
        <name type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[Marco von Ballmoos]]>
  </name>
      <uri>https://earthli.com/users/marco</uri>
    </author>
      <summary type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<p>I received a whole pile of late 80s–early 90s comic books from my Aunt Penny, who used to run a newsstand in Mohawk, New York. She&rsquo;d kept them for years and finally gave them to me for Christmas after seeing me read <em>Le Transpierceneige</em> on my laptop in the back of the minivan as Kath drove us... [<a class="complete-text-link" href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3910">More</a>]</p>
]]>
  </summary>
      <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<html lang="en">
  <head>
    <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/themes/ice.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/fonts/raleway.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/core/medium.css">
  </head>
  <body>
<div class="style-controls">  <div class="page">
    <div class="page-body">
<div class="info-box-top">
<p>
Published by <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_user.php?name=marco" title="Marco von Ballmoos" class="visible">marco</a> on <span class="date-time">11. Jan 2021 22:01:16 (GMT-5)</span>
</p>
<p>
Updated by <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_user.php?name=marco" title="Marco von Ballmoos" class="visible">marco</a> on <span class="date-time">11. Jan 2021 23:13:41 (GMT-5)</span>
</p>
</div>
      <div class="text-flow wide">
  <p>I received a whole pile of late 80s–early 90s comic books from my Aunt Penny, who used to run a newsstand in Mohawk, New York. She&rsquo;d kept them for years and finally gave them to me for Christmas after seeing me read <em>Le Transpierceneige</em> on my laptop in the back of the minivan as Kath drove us around Switzerland in the fall of 2019.</p>
<p>She gave me the following comics:</p>
<ul>
<li>DC: Batman #429: A Death in the Family Part 4</li>
<li>DC: Batman: A Death in the Family (books 1-4)</li>
<li>DC: Batman vs. Predator (1 of 3)</li>
<li>Marvel: Marvel Comics presents Wolverine #94</li>
<li>Marvel: The Uncanny X-Men #285</li>
<li>Marvel: The Amazing Spider-Man #357</li>
<li>Marvel: The Silver Surfer #61</li>
<li>Marvel: Captain America #380</li>
<li>Valiant: Harbinger Files #1</li>
<li>Valiant: Ninjak Yearbook #1</li>
<li>Valiant: Ninjak #11</li>
<li>Valiant: Ninjak #36</li>
<li>Valiant: H.A.R.D. Corps #25</li>
<li>Valiant: Magnus Robot Fighter Yearbook #1</li>
<li>Valiant: Magnus Robot Fighter #2</li>
<li>Valiant: Magnus Robot Fighter #23</li>
<li>Valiant: Magnus Robot Fighter #24</li>
<li>Valiant: Magnus Robot Fighter #25</li>
<li>Valiant: Magnus Robot Fighter #36</li>
<li>Valiant: Psi-Lords: Reign of the Star-watchers #1</li></ul><p>There are a couple of interesting things to observe about reading comic books as a grown-ass man who reads a lot of other things. Generally, the writing is a mixed bag and the writers generally wear their politics on their sleeve—even if they don&rsquo;t necessarily mean to do so. I&rsquo;m honestly not sure if they&rsquo;ve developed their writer&rsquo;s voice far enough to express much nuance—many of them are basically hacks.</p>
<p>Another thing I realized was that my own attempts at making comic-book characters—which I&rsquo;d found in my drawings and papers from my younger years—weren&rsquo;t all that much cheesier than the stuff that was finding its way into books that were being sold for actual cash-money at the time.</p>
<p>That is, most of this stuff is trash that feels like it was written by 13-year–old boys who would still have trouble describing exactly where the lady-parts are.</p>
<p>The Valiant comic books are the most egregious in this respect.</p>
<h2><em>Batman: A Death in the Family</em></h2><p>The subject is only <em>slighly</em> better. It&rsquo;s a four-part comic-book series, starring Batman, Robin and Joker. The rather overt national-politics angle is decidedly unsubtle. This series is basically a marketing campaign for a war on terror that was well in swing before 9-11.</p>
<p>The series starts with Batman firing Robin, who discovers that Batman had his his real mother from him and that she is living, conveniently enough, in the Middle East (somewhere, unspecified). The Joker, meanwhile, breaks out of Arkham Asylum, steals a nuclear weapon and <em>also</em> heads over to the Middle East to sell it to that arch-fiend <em>Lebanon</em> [1].</p>
<p>Batman tails the Joker to Lebanon, where he meets up with Robin—still searching for his real mother—and they thwart the Joker&rsquo;s plan. Somehow, this wasn&rsquo;t enough for the series, so the whole crew goes to Ethiopia where Robin&rsquo;s <em>real</em> mother is, running an aid agency. The Joker gets there first (of course) and blackmails her into doing his bidding: basically selling real medical supplies for the money to refill the warehouse with &ldquo;Joker Venom&rdquo; (I&rsquo;m not making that up). The Joker has some real dirt on her, so she also gives up Robin to him soon after they&rsquo;re reunited.</p>
<p>Instead of swooping in to save the day this time, though, Batman is too late to save mother or son. The Joker tortures them, then blows them both up. Batman returns to Gotham City with coffins and no sidekick, devastated.</p>
<p>We were only warming up, though, with the whole slavering anti-Iran thing because, get this, now the Ayatollah Khomeini himself seeks out and hires the Joker to be his representative at the UN. Freaking <em>Superman</em> shows up to prevent Batman from doing anything rash—like provoking an international incident by killing the Joker at the UN headquarters, especially now that he&rsquo;s representing the as-yet-not-named-that-yet Axis of Evil.</p>
<p>Luckily for America, the Joker can&rsquo;t control himself and isn&rsquo;t happy with his position of power. Instead, he&rsquo;s just a lunatic who tries to kill everyone in the UN instead, leaving Batman morally and ethically free to hunt him down. They end up in a helicopter; they are both shot by one of Joker&rsquo;s henchmen; they all plunge into the icy waters; Superman rescues Batman; the Joker&rsquo;s body is, of course, not found.</p>
<p>Honestly, as with the other comics above, it&rsquo;s just a bunch of revisionist, libertarian propaganda. [2]</p>
<p><hr></p>
<div class="footnote-reference"><span id="footnote_DRAFTABLE_ENTRY_3910_1_body" class="footnote-number">[1]</span> Recall that <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1983_United_States_embassy_bombing_in_Beirut">terrorists had attacked a US embassy</a> (<cite><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/">Wikipedia</a></cite>) with a truck laden with explosives, leading Reagan to close the embassy soon after. Considering that the US was actively engaged in a proxy war supporting Iraq against Iran at the time, it&rsquo;s debatable how unwarranted an attack on an embassy that housed the local branch of the CIA really was. If the situation were reversed, we&rsquo;d have no trouble justifying the attack as warranted. [3]</div><div class="footnote-reference"><span id="footnote_DRAFTABLE_ENTRY_3910_2_body" class="footnote-number">[2]</span> Maybe if I went back and read my old Spider-Man comics, I&rsquo;d think the same of those, but I somehow doubt it. Peter Parker was always poor, barely able to make ends meet. The modern Spider-Man betrays his humble origins, with him basically a scion of Tony Stark and rich and technologically super-charged beyond his wildest dreams.</div><div class="footnote-reference"><span id="footnote_DRAFTABLE_ENTRY_3910_3_body" class="footnote-number">[3]</span> <p>I speak as an authority because I researched this when I was 11 years old.<span style="width: 142px; display: table" class=" align-left"><span class="auto-content-inline"><a href="https://www.earthli.com/data/news/attachments/entry/3910/img_3216.jpeg"><img src="https://www.earthli.com/data/news/attachments/entry/3910/img_3216_tn.jpeg" alt=" " style="width: 142px"></a></span><span class="auto-content-caption"><a href="https://www.earthli.com/data/news/attachments/entry/3910/img_3216.jpeg">Hand-drawn map of the Middle East</a></span></span><span style="width: 200px; display: table" class=" align-left"><span class="auto-content-inline"><a href="https://www.earthli.com/data/news/attachments/entry/3910/img_3218.jpeg"><img src="https://www.earthli.com/data/news/attachments/entry/3910/img_3218_tn.jpeg" alt=" " style="width: 200px"></a></span><span class="auto-content-caption"><a href="https://www.earthli.com/data/news/attachments/entry/3910/img_3218.jpeg">Hand-drawn diagram of the attack</a></span></span></p>
<p><span class="clear-both"></span>I can&rsquo;t imagine that this was a homework assignment for a 4th- or 5th-grader, but maybe it was. More likely, I copied the diagrams from Time Magazine or something. Still, I was researching US foreign policy as a young &lsquo;un.</p>
</div>      </div>
      </div>
        <div class="footer">
    <div class="footer-data"><div class="footer-links"><ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/contact.php" title="">Contact</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/support.php" title="">Support</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/privacy.php" title="">Privacy</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/rights.php" title="">Rights</a></li></ul></div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="copyright">Copyright (c) 1999-2026 earthli.com. All Rights Reserved.</div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="versions">Powered by <ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore/app_news.php">earthli News 3.7</a></li><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore" title="">earthli WebCore&trade; 3.7</a></li></ul></div></div>    </div>
      </div>
  </div>  </body>
</html>
]]>
  </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
      <title type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[Books read in 2020]]>
  </title>
    <id>https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3888</id>
    <link href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3888"/>
    <updated>2021-01-03T17:16:56+01:00</updated>
    <author>
        <name type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[Marco von Ballmoos]]>
  </name>
      <uri>https://earthli.com/users/marco</uri>
    </author>
      <summary type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<p>This year&rsquo;s list of books and reviews and notes got a little bit out of hand (<a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/app]/view_article.php?id=3711">last year</a> also did). As I&rsquo;ve done in other years, I&rsquo;ve included my notes and review of each book in this article as well as linked a separate article which includes the same notes and review, as well as citations and... [<a class="complete-text-link" href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3888">More</a>]</p>
]]>
  </summary>
      <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<html lang="en">
  <head>
    <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/themes/ice.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/fonts/raleway.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/core/medium.css">
  </head>
  <body>
<div class="style-controls">  <div class="page">
    <div class="page-body">
<div class="info-box-top">
<p>
Published by <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_user.php?name=marco" title="Marco von Ballmoos" class="visible">marco</a> on <span class="date-time">3. Jan 2021 17:16:56 (GMT-5)</span>
</p>
<p>
Updated by <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_user.php?name=marco" title="Marco von Ballmoos" class="visible">marco</a> on <span class="date-time">29. May 2025 23:42:13 (GMT-5)</span>
</p>
</div>
      <div class="text-flow wide">
  <p>This year&rsquo;s list of books and reviews and notes got a little bit out of hand (<a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/app]/view_article.php?id=3711">last year</a> also did). As I&rsquo;ve done in other years, I&rsquo;ve included my notes and review of each book in this article as well as linked a separate article which includes the same notes and review, as well as citations and rough notes. So, this article weighs in at about 87 pages.</p>
<p>I only hit 21 titles this years, but many of them were meaty tomes, one in German and one in French. A lot of public-policy books this year, with the accompanying analysis. Because of COVID-19, I also spent a lot more team reading articles and learning a lot about virology and epidemiology. I also worked and wrote a lot for <a href="https://www.encodo.com">Encodo</a> last year.</p>
<ol>
<li><a href="#Queen">Queen of Chaos (2015)</a></li>
<li><a href="#Moscow">A Gentleman in Moscow (2016)</a></li>
<li><a href="#Unauthorized">Unauthorized Bread (2019)</a></li>
<li><a href="#Storage">Storage Combinators (2019)</a></li>
<li><a href="#Stacked">Stacked Borrows: An Aliasing Model for Rust (2020)</a></li>
<li><a href="#Why">Why Events Are A Bad Idea (for high-concurrency servers) (2003)</a></li>
<li><a href="#Robinson">Robinson Crusoe (1719)</a></li>
<li><a href="#World">World Made by Hand (2008)</a></li>
<li><a href="#Emergency">The Long Emergency: Surviving the End of Oil, Climate Change, and Other  Converging Catastrophes of the Twenty-first Century (2005)</a></li>
<li><a href="#Scarlet">The Scarlet Plague (1915)</a></li>
<li><a href="#Machine">The Machine Stops (1909)</a></li>
<li><a href="#Peste">La Peste (1947; fr)</a></li>
<li><a href="#Breathe">I Can&rsquo;t Breathe (2017)</a></li>
<li><a href="#Living">Living in the Long Emergency (2020)</a></li>
<li><a href="#Westen">Im Westen nichts Neues (1929)</a></li>
<li><a href="#Bullets">Bullets Points and Punch Lines (2020)</a></li>
<li><a href="#Speculation">Speculation in JavaScriptCore (2020)</a></li>
<li><a href="#Last">The Last Man (1826)</a></li>
<li><a href="#Naked">Naked Lunch (1959)</a></li>
<li><a href="#Divide">The Divide: American Injustice in the Age of the Wealth Gap (2014)</a></li>
<li><a href="#Tropic">Tropic of Cancer (1934)</a></li></ol><dl><dt class="field"><span id="Queen">Queen of Chaos (2015)</span></dt>
<dd><div class=" "><p>by <em>Diana Johnstone</em></p>
<p>This book is an unflinching history of the wars waged by the ostensibly post-Cold War United States (the last 30 years), with a focus on the so-called humanitarian bombings of the (now-) former Yugoslavia and Libya, the invasion of Iraq, the bombings of Syria, the sanctions and continued antipathy toward Russia as well as the machinations of NATO in Ukraine and the rest of Eastern Europe against both Russia and Iran. Woven into the narrative is the continued hypocrisy of purported purpose versus actual behavior, using examples from Honduras and Kosovo versus Crimea and Ukraine. </p>
<p>The book only occasionally loops back to implicate Clinton herself, although she was right there at the forefront for much, if not all, of this foreign policy. Instead, Johnstone tells a broader story of a national narrative, of which the Queen of Chaos Clinton is only an excellent and fitting representative. Johnstone spares no acrimony for Samantha Power, Susan Rice, Victoria Nuland and their poisonous worldview.</p>
<p>She provides a tremendous amount of historical detail in a well-sourced, well-written, and eminently readable) book. It is damning of the U.S. and its purported moral high ground, summing it up early on as follows:</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The United States is an irresponsible empire. It devastates countries and leaves them in shambles, with no compensation. Its actions are increasingly destructive because the purpose is not in reality to build an empire, but to destroy real or potential rivals and so maintain the position of superiority gained in World War II.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>Again and again, she shows how things that &ldquo;we all know&rdquo; from American history are deliberate fabrications, propaganda intended to tell history from the point of view of those in power in the States. The U.S. won WWII on its own. They were never allied with the Soviets. The French ran with their tails tucked. The Berlin Wall signaled the end of the Soviet Empire—they were defeated rather than giving up.</p>
<p>What would follow is an uninterrupted flow of lies, marketing campaigns for poisonous policies that benefited only a small cabal while killing millions and consigning millions more—even in the U.S.—to lives of despair. War would be made something palatable by making it seem like the most propitious and least-damaging of solutions to what seemed one intractable problem after another.</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;Inherent in all this is an apology for “preventive” war. That is, unprovoked aggressive war, waged to “prevent” the rise of a rival, or to get rid of a dictator, or to head off some supposed threat, such as (nonexistent) weapons of mass destruction.</p>
<p>&ldquo;[…]</p>
<p>&ldquo;This is the most blatant trick in the “preventive war” doctrine: <strong>we may go to war to prevent something that never would have happened anyway, but since it didn’t happen, we can claim credit for preventing it.</strong> (Emphasis added.)&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote><p>And war is only one policy that serves the primary goal: to ensure that this same tiny cabal—the 0.1%—continue to exert their control over the rest of the world. Globalization is also just a tool to enable these people to grow their empire and to never have to fear that they will lose their wealth, power, and luxury.</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;[…] globalization means Americanization of the entire world. Our interests and values must prevail everywhere. In short, globalization means a world tied together by the universal penetration of financial markets in every sector of each national economy,&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>In the propaganda war, the ideas of the left—progressives—must be subsumed, drained into a fallow field, where they won&rsquo;t cause any further trouble. To this end, the left has only too eagerly grasped the proffered <span class="quote-inline">&ldquo;consolation prize [of] ideological hegemony in the more sentimental area of human relations&rdquo;</span>. That is, they&rsquo;ve been distracted by the bauble of purported sociological control, completely unaware that it doesn&rsquo;t matter at all because they&rsquo;ve long since capitulated any differing opinions on economics or determining the purpose and goals of society.</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Completely defeated in the area of economic policy, the left gets to define the dominant social doctrine, based on multiculturalism, concern for minorities, and anti-racism. <strong>Americans are taught to judge the governments of other countries almost exclusively by how they treat pro-Western dissidents or select minorities.</strong> (Emphasis added.)&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>But even here, the hypocrisy is astounding, absolutely flabbergasting. Russia&rsquo;s &ldquo;problems with gays&rdquo; (a law forbidding &ldquo;proselytizing&rdquo; to minors about homosexuality) are considered nearly a reason to bomb it flat without a second thought while there is no issue at all with Saudi Arabia&rsquo;s death penalty for homosexuality.</p>
<p>The media and most of the political apparatus in America is in agreement. They are either incredibly stupid, incredibly ignorant, incredibly brainwashed, incredibly hypocritical, incredibly Machiavellian or some disgusting combination of all of these. Thanks to the Internet, it <em>is</em> possible to find dissidents. Thanks to media monopolies, it&rsquo;s not even worth the energy to try to suppress them.</p>
<p>The U.S. is only too happy to throw stones in all directions, framing countries as good or bad based on their own rules. Johnstone deftly slays this paper tiger.</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Gay rights – or rather “LGBT” rights – is now the one human rights area where the United States can claim to be “in advance” of most of the world. The issue can be used to attempt to discredit and embarrass other countries at a time when the United States is lagging behind in areas such as child mortality, income equality, life expectancy, primary education, and industrial productivity. As mentioned above, <strong>there is one area in which it does lead the world: the size of its prison population. Surely this is a more meaningful measurement of the state of “human rights” in the United States than the legality of gay marriage.</strong> (Emphasis added.)&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>And don&rsquo;t forget that this supposed interest in gay rights—or any minority rights—is complete bullshit in the service of the higher goal of world ideological domination through capital. It&rsquo;s all in the service of the goal stated at the very beginning: <span class="quote-inline">&ldquo;destroy real or potential rivals&rdquo;</span>.</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;While the United States officially hails “multi-ethnicity”, ethnic minorities in China and Russia are clearly seen as weaknesses to be exploited in order to destabilize and even break apart these great nations into more manageable pieces, on the model of Yugoslavia.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>There is no concept too sacred to twist into a weapon in the service of this goal. Johnstone takes time to see the many ways in which accusations of &ldquo;genocide&rdquo;—instead of being using carefully and absolutely only where appropriate–are scattered about wherever the U.S. needs advantage. And the rest of the world kowtows to this linguistic bullying, for its own selfish reasons.</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Once a leader is accused of “genocide”, there can be no negotiations, no diplomacy, no attempt to find a peaceful solution to the conflict which is the background of the alleged crime. <strong>The guilty party can only be indicted or killed.</strong> (Emphasis added.)&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>The pattern repeats itself endlessly and tiresomely. To these ends, the U.S. uses its massive media empire to tell stories about the rest of the world—narrative over which it has sole control, that it alone shapes. For example, during the Arab Spring, where the entire narrative was driven by interviewees who, judging by their accents, had obviously spent their politically formative years at American universities.</p>
<p>We don&rsquo;t seem to have any problem believing &ldquo;facts&rdquo; delivered by people about countries whose language and culture they know nothing about and to which they&rsquo;ve never traveled. It was the same in Serbia, where <span class="quote-inline">&ldquo;[r]eporters searched Albanian refugee camps for “somebody who has been raped and speaks English”.&rdquo;</span></p>
<p>How much sense does it make to come to conclusions about foreign policy reported in this way? You can take the information in, but should reserve judgment rather than leaping to conclusions. What are the odds that the Washington Post or the New York Times has the story right about a policy in China when they get everything wrong about stories in their own country?</p>
<p>Throughout the book, Johnstone takes issue with U.S. control of the narrative, the &ldquo;framing&rdquo; of issues, of large-scale ideas like international conflict. Even in this case, people are taught to think of actual wars like flame wars on the Internet: as differences in ideology. This is a luxury that only those in the relatively opulent West have. No-one really goes to war unless they are in desperate straits. No-one but empires.</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;[…] the totally unproven assumption that wars are caused by differences in political systems rather than by competition for resources, territorial disputes, or any number of other conflicts that may arise. It rules out coexistence between systems; <strong>the underlying implication is that our particular cause for going to war is to make every country resemble ours.</strong> (Emphasis added.)&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>Even granting that they may have started with the right aims, purportedly independent organizations like Amnesty International (and, even worse, Human Rights Watch) are subsumed by this worldview, trumpeting the U.S.&lsquo;s truth and granting their implicit imprimatur. Each &ldquo;win&rdquo; advances the U.S. agenda more, moving it to its position as the &ldquo;leader of the free world&rdquo; in not only its own mind, but everyone else&rsquo;s.</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;[…] the main object of the “Kosovo war” was to put the United States and NATO above the law, where they remain to this day.</p>
<p>&ldquo;[…]</p>
<p>&ldquo;&rdquo;</p>
<ol></ol><p>&ldquo;</p>
<p>&ldquo;The Czech Republic, Hungary and Poland were taken into NATO on the eve of the bombing of Yugoslavia in 1999.”&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote><p>This isn&rsquo;t to say that everything the U.S. does moves it forward inexorably on a track to world domination. It is a stupid, half-blind and <em>mean</em> beast. It blunders about, knowing little and learning nothing, shouting accusations and conspiracy theories, often unaware that it is getting in its own way. Those who always benefit continue to do so, but they also often create more problems for themselves as well as everyone else. They just don&rsquo;t suffer for it—except for maybe losing a bit on an investment once in a while.</p>
<p>It&rsquo;s not even an efficient death machine. There is no more eloquent example of this than the mean-spirited and blinkered thinking that led to Gaddafi&rsquo;s ouster. Destroying Libya for revenge against a man who&rsquo;d never really harmed them has loosed more problems on the U.S. strategy than they&rsquo;d anticipated—not unusual, since policymakers there understand so little of the real world and believe their own bullshit. This is bound to hamper their plans.</p>
<p>In the case of Libya and Gaddafi, it was about eliminating a successful, quasi-socialist regime that shared its country&rsquo;s wealth with <em>all</em> of its citizens. Chavez and now Maduro can tell the same story about Venezuela. So has it always been and so will it remain until the sun sets on the American empire: so terrified of the communists that they let the anti-communists destroy everything instead.</p>
<p>Reading this book now—in a presidential election year where Hillary is opening her big yap again and Bernie is about to be torpedoed by the Dems again—is instructive. Johnstone eloquently lays out the limits of policy and ideology in the U.S.</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;When it comes to domestic legislation, no truly progressive or egalitarian policies are feasible. However much they quarrel, both parties have accepted that domestic politics must conform to the interests of financial capital, “the markets”.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>This kind of single-mindedness isn&rsquo;t limited to Hillary. Though she was there at each critical juncture and is the Queen in the title, she is far from alone. Instead, the U.S. is full of people in power who are guilty of, </p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;[…] thoughtlessly endorsing the possibility of nuclear war with no more reflection tha[n] a sports star endorsing a soft drink. This frivolity indicates that the problem of Hillary Rodham Clinton goes far beyond a single individual and reveals a far deeper crisis in the American political system.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>I&rsquo;ve included <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3889">notes, citations and errata</a> in a separate post.</p>
</div></dd>
<dt class="field"><span id="Moscow">A Gentleman in Moscow (2016)</span></dt>
<dd><div class=" "><p>by <em>Amor Towles</em></p>
<p>This book should appeal to anyone who reads for the pleasure of reading. Towles has a knack for describing the world that, even when not impelling the story, is still so very much fun to read. The revolution of 1917 and its aftermath of Bolshevik lack of appreciation for culture is a background, but it doesn&rsquo;t figure strongly in the first third of the book. In fact, for the first third of the book, the story meanders, but doesn&rsquo;t really head anywhere. </p>
<p>Instead, we are treated to a history of Russia and its idea of itself as well as its place in the world, as viewed by a man who is unable to leave the Hotel Metropol—a luxury hotel whose purpose is at-times at odds with the purpose of the revolutionary government. It is a place that suits the gentleman&rsquo;s sensibilities, but not those of the new leaders of the Soviet Union.</p>
<p>In the introduction, we learn that Count Alexander Ilyich Rostov is to be confined to the Hotel Metropol as punishment for having been born noble. He is neither exiled nor killed because of a famous revolutionary poem attributed to him. He had been living there for a year already, after having returned from Paris after the revolution. Why did he return when nobility like him were the deposed minority former rulers? Because he is Russian and he belongs in Russia, damn the consequences for his &ldquo;kind&rdquo;.</p>
<p>We visit the hotel with the Count, going through his rituals and routines at both the fancy and more pedestrian restaurants, the barber, the seamstress and so on. The Count makes nine-year–old Nina Kulikova&rsquo;s acquaintance and watches her grow up in the hotel. After a while, she is forced to move on, but she leaves him her passepartout with which he is able to explore much more of the hotel.</p>
<p>At the same time, the Count takes a job as the head waiter of the Boyarsky, the fancy restaurant on the second floor of the Metropol. He makes great friends with what would become the other two members of the &ldquo;Triumvirate&rdquo;: Emile, the chef, and Andrey, the maître&rsquo;d. They tell magnificent stories. At the same time, he begins a relationship with the beguiling, intelligent, and beautiful actress Anna Urbanova.</p>
<p>Mischka, the Count&rsquo;s friend from old days, makes good headway in the new regime, putting the finishing touches on a multi-book biography of Pushkin. He is asked to remove a sentence from one letter in the third volume in which Pushkin exclaimed over the glory of German bread, comparing it to the highly unfavorable and inadequate Russian variant. Mischka at first acquiesces, but then returns in a rage, offended to the core. He would pay for his principles with eight years of hard labor and then the &ldquo;Minus Six&rdquo; punishment: he would be free to travel in all of Russia minus the six great cities. The Count would see his friend only once or twice more.</p>
<p>The Count&rsquo;s services are engaged by a Georgian Colonel Osip, who needs his erudition to learn how to deal with the outside world. The Count teaches him English and French as well as the cultures of the French, British and the Americans. Over 15 years, they become fast friends, reading many books and watching many films together. Osip is fascinated by the subversiveness and open nihilism of film noir, wondering how it is that the western governments allow it to exist. He has not quite grasped that while the Soviet was about overt suppression, America was about <em>distraction</em>. Orwell&rsquo;s vision vs. Huxley&rsquo;s.</p>
<p>Years later, Nina returns. She was a serious child and grew into a serious worker, intent on doing her part to further the revolution&rsquo;s aim. Now, having married and had a child five years ago, she is there to ask the Count to watch her child while she searches for her husband, who&rsquo;s been carted off to Siberia. She is loath to take her daughter Sofia with her, though. Would Alexander be willing to watch her for a few weeks or months until she can send for her? Of course he can. No question. He would never see Nina again.</p>
<p>In due course, the Count&rsquo;s suave demeanor and worldly knowledge attract the attention of an American Aide-de-camp Richard Vanderwhile. They hit it off immediately and also become friends. On one side, there is Osip, whose power and rank are only hinted at and now there is Richard, on the other side, also nearly certainly more powerful than he at first seems.</p>
<p>Sofia is 13 years old. She has an accident playing a game with the Count—she falls down service stairs trying to race him to their apartment. He carries her to a hospital, breaking his imprisonment. His friend Osip swoops in and smooths things over, sending him back to the Metropol and assuring him that Sofia will have the best care and will recover fully.</p>
<ol></ol><p>Sofia is now 17 years old. She is still living with the Count at the Metropol. It is after WWII, nearly 1950. The Count is now 61 years old.</p>
<p>The orchestra conductor at the hotel discovered Sofia&rsquo;s talent for piano. Over the next few years, he nurtures what is clearly not just a talent, but an absolute gift for music, for putting pathos and feeling into musical pieces of which adults several times her age are incapable. The Count is understandably proud that Sofia is excelling on all fronts.</p>
<p>Rostov and his troika (Emile and Andrei) are forced to take up the master of the hotel (the Bishop, formerly the most terrible waiter in the second-class restaurant and now promoted through an innate talent for sycophancy and adherence to party cant) into their meetings, making them altogether less enjoyable. Life continues. The Count&rsquo;s decades-long relationship with Anna continues and grows. Stalin dies. The country shivers in the power vacuum.</p>
<p>Things for the Count come to a head when Sofia is invited to play in Paris in six months time, sometime in the late 50s. The Count prepares assiduously for her defection—and his own escape from the hotel. He takes his leave silently and with masterful planning and execution, rolling with a few kinks thrown into the plan by the Bishop, who gets his comeuppance, while the rest of his friends get richly rewarded with the remainder of his gold fortune that he&rsquo;d kept stashed away for decades in cleverly contrived compartments in the legs of his desk.</p>
<p>Sofia puts on a spectacular show in Paris, then defects to the U.S. embassy, meeting up with Richard Vanderwhile and getting the large part of Rostov&rsquo;s fortune hand-delivered to her then. The Count ranges into the Russian countryside, having fooled the authorities with a clever subterfuge into thinking that he&rsquo;d escaped over the border into Finland. In a rustic inn, he meets up with Anna Urbanova, once again free to live out the remainder of his life with the woman he loves in the country he loves.</p>
<p>Osip&rsquo;s favorite movies is <em>Casablanca</em>—a movie that he watched with the Count many times. When we see him in a final scene, in the Kremlin, in the office of the chief of the KGB, behind the desk, he has just heard of the Count&rsquo;s escape and Sofia&rsquo;s disappearance, to which he replies: <span class="quote-inline">&ldquo;Round up the usual suspects.&rdquo;</span></p>
<p>The Count is a gracious and polite man, relatively well-read, and of indeterminate age. The writing is lovely and appeals to my dilettantish Russophile tendencies. Towles makes references to streets in Moscow and St. Petersburg (Leningrad) and to moments in history and literature (Gogol&rsquo;s Nose and Tolstoy&rsquo;s Borodino and, of course, to Pushkin and Chekhov) that ring authentic for me.</p>
<p>Despite having been &ldquo;trapped&rdquo; in the Metropol Hotel for most of his adult life, Rostov&rsquo;s rich inner life, philosophy and discipline allow him to consider himself to be &ldquo;the luckiest man in Russia&rdquo;.</p>
<p>I&rsquo;ve included <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3896">notes, citations and errata</a> in a separate post.</p>
</div></dd>
<dt class="field"><span id="Unauthorized">Unauthorized Bread (2019)</span></dt>
<dd><div class=" "><p>by <em>Cory Doctorow</em></p>
<p><a href="https://arstechnica.com/gaming/2020/01/unauthorized-bread-a-near-future-tale-of-refugees-and-sinister-iot-appliances/">Unauthorized Bread</a> by <cite>Cory Doctorow</cite> (<cite><a href="http://arstechnica.com/">Ars Technica</a></cite>) is a novella describing a near-future (or perhaps alternate present) that could really only happen in the United States. Hyper-capitalism has proceeded to a point where private industry has extended its tendrils into all aspects of the pitiful excuse for a social contract the state even bothers to extend to the overwhelming majority of its population.</p>
<p>The story is about Salima, an immigrant bouncing around the system, trying to get her feet under her. She befriends Nalifa, an Eritrean immigrant with two children, at an internment camp. After a couple of years, they get an &ldquo;opportunity&rdquo; to get cheaper housing in a building called Dorchester Towers. </p>
<ol></ol><p>This building offers reduced-rate housing in exchange for being able to build much higher than the local building codes would allow. There is a rich section and a handful of floors—35 to 42—reserved for the poor. The elevators prefer the rich. The poor are forced to walk in the morning, when the 45-minute wait for an elevator would make them late for already-precarious jobs. In the evening, they tend to just wait rather than walking up 35 flights.</p>
<p>There is no air-conditioning in the poor half of the entryway to the building. Security guards keep the riff-raff out. The apartments are small, but decent. However, none of their appliances are theirs: the toaster only cooks approved foods; the dishwasher only washes approved dishes; the refrigerator only hold approved foods. These foods are, of course, more expensive and nutritionally worse than the more &ldquo;ethnic&rdquo; food that most of the residents would prefer.</p>
<p>The story is of the failure of the web of companies—one among them being <em>Boulangism</em>, which makes the toaster—that were responsible for maintaining the servers with which all of the appliances communicated in order to function. So the poor floors are left without an oven too cook in and without a dishwasher to wash dishes in and a refrigerator that refuses food.</p>
<p>Salima learns how to hack on the Darknet—using an old notebook rather than the &lsquo;fridge (which is the main way most people access information). She hacks her own appliances and gets not only food and a working dishwasher, but a degree of autonomy and control over her own life. She helps the rest of the poor part of the building free themselves as well. They all benefit, as they can now buy cheaper and healthier supplies rather than the corporate foods.</p>
<p>In her travels to accounting clients (she&rsquo;s an accountant for small businesses, doing quite well for herself, actually), she meets Wye, a programmer working for the company that acquired the husk of Boulangism and is working very hard to get things back online—and providing, once again, money for the corporation.</p>
<p>Wye is sympathetic, but is also initially callous, not even really understanding how terrible it is for a system to force people to use such appliances and then to just drop them for months, making it illegal for them to make other arrangements, despite the state and corporation having failed to hold up its end of the bargain at all.</p>
<p>When the software comes online, though, it will detect all of the hacked software and pinpoint Dorchester Towers as a &ldquo;bunch of cheaters&rdquo;. Salima desperately tries to put things back the way they were, killing the budding revolution in the cradle, afraid (quite rightly) that the powers-that-be will exact a terrible punishment. Once she has converted all of the apartments back, she discovers a better way: run a VM in the devices that pretends to be a conforming device, but which runs another copy of a non-confirming and hacked OS.</p>
<p>Though the company tries to get Salima to work with them, essentially betraying her own class, Salima holds strong. At first Wye is disappointed, but she comes around and works, in the end, to help Salima continue to subvert any anti-hacking measures that the company employs.</p>
<p>I&rsquo;ve included <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3903">notes, citations and errata</a> in a separate post.</p>
</div></dd>
<dt class="field"><span id="Storage">Storage Combinators (2019)</span></dt>
<dd><div class=" "><p>by <em>Marcel Weiher and Robert Hirschfeld</em></p>
<p>This <a href="https://www.hpi.uni-potsdam.de/hirschfeld/publications/media/WeiherHirschfeld_2019_StorageCombinators_AcmDL_Preprint.pdf">paper (PDF)</a> (<cite><a href="http://www.hpi.uni-potsdam.de/">Hasso Plattner Institute, University of Potsdam, Potsdam, Germany</a></cite>) discusses a proposal for composing all objects in a software system using a common API called &ldquo;Storage Combinators&rdquo; rather than using custom interfaces everywhere. They authors demonstrate how an application could benefit from composability of such operations—akin to how the REST standard has improved composability for disparate and individually developed services—purportedly without sacrificing any of the expressiveness of a more bespoke API.</p>
<p>The following summary is from the &ldquo;Discussion&rdquo; section:</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;In-Process REST in general and storage combinators in particular take an architectural style known to work well in the distributed case and scale it down to work in the non-distributed, local case in order to bring along the modularity benefits associated with that style.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>Many bespoke APIs are needlessly different from one another. It&rsquo;s an interesting idea to enforce API strictures akin to REST between software components running in the same memory space. What is a bit odd is their insistence on using Objective Smalltalk for all of their examples—a language that I&rsquo;d never even heard of (and I&rsquo;ve been paying attention). No-one is using this language [1] and its syntax is based on two of the bigger syntax boondoggles in our industry: Smalltalk and Objective-C. Due to this idiosyncratic choice, it&rsquo;s not always easy to distill the purpose from the examples.</p>
<p>Still, the storage combinators are interesting and end up being the &ldquo;In-process REST&rdquo; that the authors described in the citation above. Once they&rsquo;ve defined the basic storage API—<code>GET</code>, <code>PUT</code>, <code>PATCH</code>, and <code>DELETE</code>, they define a plethora of common behavior that transforms to it: switches, logging, caching, JSON, etc. From these components, they go on to define an HTTP server and client that communicate via a JSON protocol (naturally).</p>
<p>An interesting addendum is that they&rsquo;ve actually developed this approach in several industry projects that are in production, so it&rsquo;s not just an ivory-tower exercise without any real-world basis. I personally wonder how well the average developer can grok and work with a severely reduced API (in their eyes). That is, while it&rsquo;s definitely possible for a good programmer to build everything they need from these combinators (essentially first-principle building blocks), it&rsquo;s unclear to me whether that scales to a large enough base of actually existing developers. The approach is complete, but restrictive; it also makes it very difficult for developers to work with existing frameworks and profit from the documentation and community available there.</p>
<p>This possible downside aside, a positive effect was that developers wrote a lot less custom code, instead re-using the existing building blocks and creating their own. When they stayed focused on the compositional pattern, using the at-times very abstract building blocks, they did end up with a well-performing solution. A downside, as expected, was that, since the developers didn&rsquo;t write most of the code themselves <em>and</em> the building blocks are relatively highly abstracted, debugging was more difficult and <span class="quote-inline">&ldquo;it was often impossible to determine the dataflow path before runtime&rdquo;</span> and <span class="quote-inline">&ldquo;it would be difficult to debug, because a programmer has to step through the whole data transformation path during runtime&rdquo;</span>.</p>
<p>These are pitfalls associated with any highly generalized framework. They are not incidental problems to be taken care of in minor updates, but point to a possibly fatal flaw in an overgeneralized framework. [2] Despite many iterations, they seem to have landed on a highly generic implementation that cannot be easily used by mere mortals. My own experiences with developing frameworks have taught me to stay slightly less generic with the parts that mortal developers will come into contact with. It&rsquo;s not that they&rsquo;re not smart enough to get it, but that they will all have to learn from one of the masters, which doesn&rsquo;t scale well.</p>
<p>Instead, a slightly more redundant and not as highly generalized architecture tends to allow developers to build up local knowledge and synergies without constant &ldquo;herding&rdquo; by senior developers. They end with more code-duplication and are less able to benefit from performance improvements and bug fixes in common components, but they are able to work more autonomously—or even at all. The debugging and introspection issues mentioned above are kind of framework-killers as I don&rsquo;t really see a good way around them short of developing a highly targeted DSL with its own source-level debugger, IDE, etc.</p>
<p>The conclusion of the paper is a bit at odds with itself: on the one hand, it writes, </p>
<ol></ol><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Their use correlates strongly with positive effects on code-size, performance, reliability and productivity, both observationally and in the minds of developers.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>But then immediately writes that,</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;One area of future research is how to type and statically type-check storage combinators. The same generic nature that makes storage combinators so composable also makes it difficult to verify when they are connected correctly.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>This seems kind of like a fatal flaw that the team has managed to patch with having good developers who intimately understand the framework—and probably with lots of debugging hours. Their next topic in the conclusion is about debugging and discusses a DSL as I mentioned above as a possible solution.</p>
<p>None of these things will be easy to implement or build and it&rsquo;s honestly unclear to me whether it even can be built without sacrificing the flexibility or the purity of the initial approach. In the end, you&rsquo;ll end up with a compromised system with bespoke everything and many, many idiosyncratic and poorly documented behaviors. And, since <em>everything&rsquo;s</em> bespoke, you can&rsquo;t lean on external communities and documentation and search for anything. I wish them the best of luck, but don&rsquo;t hold out much hope for the path that they&rsquo;re on.</p>
<p><hr></p>
<div class="footnote-reference"><span id="footnote_DRAFTABLE_ENTRY_3888_1_body" class="footnote-number">[1]</span> It doesn&rsquo;t have a Wiki page and the only <a href="http://objective.st">home page</a> I can find looks like it was built with Doxygen anno 1999 and the certificate isn&rsquo;t even valid.</div><div class="footnote-reference"><span id="footnote_DRAFTABLE_ENTRY_3888_2_body" class="footnote-number">[2]</span> While it&rsquo;s possible for an <em>underlying</em> framework to be this highly generalized, it&rsquo;s generally inefficient to have all of your developers working at this level—most of them aren&rsquo;t skilled enough to do so. That is, a framework can benefit from a high level of generalization that significantly reduces code-duplication, but that part has to very rarely be evident to mortal developers. Instead, they should float in a substrate of other APIs, that are more more straightforward to specify (i.e. high-level APIs that benefit from composability but don&rsquo;t necessarily <em>expose</em> it) and are more easily debugged and tested.</div><p>I&rsquo;ve included <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3946">notes, citations and errata</a> in a separate post.</p>
</div></dd>
<dt class="field"><span id="Stacked">Stacked Borrows: An Aliasing Model for Rust (2020)</span></dt>
<dd><div class=" "><p>by <em>Ralf Jung, Hoang-hai Dang, Jeehoon Kang, Derek Dreyer</em></p>
<p>This <a href="https://plv.mpi-sws.org/rustbelt/stacked-borrows/paper.pdf">paper (PDF)</a> (<cite><a href="http://plv.mpi-sws.org/">Saarland Informatics Campus, Germany</a></cite>) is a recent one addressing one of the main weaknesses of the &ldquo;borrow checker&rdquo; in Rust. What&rsquo;s a borrow checker? Where other programming languages have chosen from manual memory-management (C, early C++, early Pascal, etc.), garbage-collection (C#, Java, etc.) and reference-counting (Swift, modern C++, etc.), Rust chose a new path: the borrow checker.</p>
<ol></ol><p>The rules of the language require that the program be written in a manner where it is always clear who owns memory and who is &ldquo;using&rdquo; memory. Allocated memory is always deallocated when it leaves the scope in which it was allocated, unless the memory was passed on to a different scope by &ldquo;loaning&rdquo; it. If a &ldquo;borrowed&rdquo; reference lingers after this scope is closed, the compiler flags it as an error. Rust also has a lot of support for explicitly copying references, when the borrow checker can&rsquo;t be satisfied any other way. The algorithm treats mutable and immutable references accordingly. See the <a href="https://doc.rust-lang.org/1.8.0/book/references-and-borrowing.html">Rust documentation on references and borrowing</a> or the paper itself for an in-depth discussion.</p>
<p>This approach requires more involvement on the part of the programmer, but also results in programs that provably have neither memory leaks nor access violations should the program pass compilation. This is a very interesting property for Rust to be able to guarantee—and it accomplishes it without a garbage collector (with its associated performance issues and difficulty in being predictable enough for real-time, system-level code) or reference-counting (which also incurs performance overhead and require participation of the runtime). Instead, a Rust program&rsquo;s memory usage is guaranteed by the compiler to be correct, so there is no need for asynchronous tasks or runtime support.</p>
<p>In the current incarnation of Rust, this guarantee comes with a big caveat: the borrow checker does not deal with <code>unsafe</code> blocks at all. It is hoped that most Rust code can avoid <code>unsafe</code> blocks, relying instead of higher-level abstractions that hide unsafe code. However, what guarantee is there that the unsafe code used in the common libraries or popular crates is not misallocating or misusing memory? While the code in the base libraries is fastidiously written and covered by myriad tests, errors are bound to slip in.</p>
<p>This is where the software proposed in this paper comes in. The authors build on the borrow-checker concept to extend it to unsafe regions as well. They come up with a new borrow-checking algorithm called &ldquo;Stacked Borrows&rdquo; that is more sophisticated than the initial algorithm introduced with and still used in modern Rust. The authors show that the their algorithm not only allows a compiler to improve its borrow-checking <em>but also</em> increases the number of situations in which a compiler can be 100% sure of the placement of variable manipulations so that it can optimize many more situations to produce much more performant code. [3]</p>
<p>That is,</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;In this work, we propose Stacked Borrows, an operational semantics for memory accesses in Rust. Stacked Borrows defines an aliasing discipline and declares programs violating it to have undefined behavior, meaning the compiler does not have to consider such programs when performing optimizations.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>They obviously spent quite a bit of time honing their algorithm, running their test interpreter and compiler against a large part of the Rust standard library and popular crates. Their paper includes not only the algorithm, but also several proofs for why the algorithm can guarantee certain properties that a compiler can use to optimize code much better than today&rsquo;s Rust compiler. Not only that, but their attack on the corpus of Rust code yielded several cases in which highly central Rust runtime/system <code>unsafe</code> code was incorrect and possibly leaked or violated memory. Several of their pull requests have been accepted and the team and their tool is quite well-received in the Rust community.</p>
<p>They have made this tool, an interpreter named <em>Miri</em> available for anyone to use and test until <span class="quote-inline">&ldquo;[we can] eventually mak[e] a variant of Stacked Borrows part of the official semantics of Rust.&rdquo;</span></p>
<p>I&rsquo;ve included <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3947">notes, citations and errata</a> in a separate post.</p>
</div></dd>
<dt class="field"><span id="Why">Why Events Are A Bad Idea (for high-concurrency servers) (2003)</span></dt>
<dd><div class=" "><p>by <em>Rob von Behren, Jeremy Condit and Eric Brewer</em></p>
<ol></ol><p>This is an older <a href="https://people.eecs.berkeley.edu/~brewer/papers/threads-hotos-2003.pdf">paper (PDF)</a> (<cite><a href="http://people.eecs.berkeley.edu/">University of California at Berkeley</a></cite>) that discusses event-based systems (essentially cooperative multi-tasking) vs. threaded implementations (pre-emptive multi-tasking). The conclusion in this paper from 2003 (nearly 20 years ago) is that threads are hands-down easier to work with and offer the promised performance, <em>given that</em> the implementation is robust.</p>
<p>The fact that events vs. threads was still being discussed at the time was only due to very sub-standard threading implementations that engendered deadlocks, race-conditions and terrible performance. Modern threading implementations are based on OS constructs that trade memory for performance by storing a separate stack for each thread. Only the registers need to be switched out when switching threads/tasks.</p>
<p>It&rsquo;s interesting that one of the main arguments against threads was <span class="quote-inline">&ldquo;restrictive control flow&rdquo;</span> because that issue has now been nearly completely addressed by the <code>Promise</code>/<code>Future</code> pattern, encapsulated in an even easier-to-use syntax as <code>async</code>/<code>await</code> in languages like C#, JavaScript. TypeScript, and Rust. This paradigm abstracts subroutines without making any promises about how the code in those subroutines is executed.</p>
<p>Just from the keywords, it&rsquo;s obvious that the <em>idea</em> is to execute the code asynchronously, but it&rsquo;s not a requirement in all cases. The .NET literature is full of discussions of optimizations that balance a cooperative approach for quick &ldquo;bailout&rdquo; scenarios—where e.g. a value is available in constant time and doesn&rsquo;t actually necessitate a thread as it will never wait on any asynchronous I/O— to those that seamlessly grab a thread from a pool and schedule the code asynchronously (and preemptively) only if needed. Many of these different code-paths are even allocation-free in the .NET Core Runtime, leading to massive performance boosts versus older implementations.</p>
<p>Recently, the developers of Rust have written several interesting papers—and white-paper–length blogs—about the <code>async</code>/<code>await</code> implementation in Rust that go in the same directly: weighing the pros and cons of event-based vs. thread-based implementations.</p>
<p>The authors of this paper concluded with:</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Although event systems have been used to obtain good performance in high concurrency systems, we have shown that similar or even higher performance can be achieved with threads. Moreover, the simpler programming model and wealth of compiler analyses that threaded systems afford gives threads an important advantage over events when writing highly concurrent servers. In the future, we advocate tight integration between the compiler and the thread system, which will result in a programming model that offers a clean and simple interface to the programmer while achieving superior performance.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>And so it would come to be.</p>
<p>I&rsquo;ve included <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3948">notes, citations and errata</a> in a separate post.</p>
</div></dd>
<dt class="field"><span id="Robinson">Robinson Crusoe (1719)</span></dt>
<dd><div class=" "><p>by <em>Daniel Defoe</em></p>
<p>This is the story of a young, wealthy Englishman who leaves the comforts of his well-off family to seek his fortune on the high seas. His father warns him against it, telling him to instead find comfort in the warm cocoon of the upper middle-class.</p>
<p>Instead, his life takes him from well-off scion to dilettante sailor to slave to slave-owner (literally just assuming that his co-escapee, also a slave, would just continue to be <em>his</em> slave once they&rsquo;d escaped their common owner) to plantation owner to wannabe slave-trader to castaway to nearly incomprehensibly rich ship and island and plantation owner (through nearly no effort of his own, as he&rsquo;d been stranded for nearly three decades, doing literally nothing to grow the fortune that he mysteriously gets anyway).</p>
<p>Robinson embarks in August of 1651 and soon disembarks from a shipwreck, but safe in a harbor. He sets off again, but is beset by pirates, who take him captive and sell him to the north-African Moors as a slave. He is two years a slave before he can take a boat and escape along the coast of Africa, with fellow escapee Xury. They are finally taken in by a Portugese ship with a very generous and fair captain, who agrees to buy Xury and takes Crusoe to Brazil, depriving him of not one possession.</p>
<p>Crusoe doesn&rsquo;t at all question his assumed superiority to Xury, nor his right to sell him to the captain. That they consider him to be chattel does nothing at all to diminish their firm opinions that they are both good men.</p>
<p>Continuing to fail upward, Crusoe manages to parlay his minor fortune into a pretty major fortune. For a few years, he owns a plantation in Brazil before the wanderlust takes him again. In 1659, he agrees to head up an expedition to secure slaves from Africa for his and other plantations. Continuing his excellent seafaring luck, he shipwrecks about 40 miles out of the Orinoco river. No-one else survives.</p>
<p>The ship is still upright enough and is beached on a sandbar, close enough to shore to reach by swimming. The storm has abated. Crusoe makes several trips to the boat to retrieve supplies and float them back to the island.</p>
<p>He sets up life on the island, building a shelter, shooting goats and collecting water. A year in, he finds God. He explores the island, finding the other half to be much more hospitable, but is loath to move from what he now considers to be &ldquo;home&rdquo;, with its view of the sea and possible rescue.</p>
<p>He is inordinately terrified of &ldquo;cannibals&rdquo; and keeps his head down over years and even decades, with only his raving imaginings of potential attack to keep him company. E.g.,</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;[…] where are found the worst of savages; for they are cannibals or men-eaters, and fail not to murder and devour all the human bodies that fall into their hands.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>Obviously. For they’ve nothing better to do than lust after his precious rump roast. Further on, Defoe tries to give birth to a sentence, but can&rsquo;t find the end of it:</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Then, supposing they were not cannibals, yet they might kill me, as many Europeans who had fallen into their hands had been served, even when they had been ten or twenty together—much more I, that was but one, and could make little or no defence; all these things, I say, which I ought to have considered well; and did come into my thoughts afterwards, yet gave me no apprehensions at first, and my head ran mightily upon the thought of getting over to the shore.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>This sentence is a work of art. It’s convoluted to the point of incomprehensibility, seeming to have trapped the author into a whirlpool from which he can only escape via several awkward and completely nonsensical semicolons. Before that, though, he expresses his casual racism toward “cannibals”, who almost certainly don’t exist, and expresses a fear that they will kill him, although his countrymen have probably killed the islanders many hundreds of times more.</p>
<p>On page 147, he admits that <span class="quote-inline">&ldquo;I had lived there fifteen years now and had not met with the least shadow or figure of any people yet,&rdquo;</span> so he&rsquo;s not really in <em>imminent</em> danger. He goes through 18, then 23, then 24 years without seeing another soul (though he had seen a single footprint once, which terrified him, ruining his sleep, for <em>years</em>).</p>
<p>It is at this point, that he finally gets his &ldquo;Man Friday&rdquo;.</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;It came very warmly upon my thoughts, and indeed irresistibly, that now was the time to get me a servant, and, perhaps, a companion or assistant; and that I was plainly called by Providence to save this poor creature’s life.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>Of course, he&rsquo;s going to shower the man with his beneficence by allowing him to become his slave. Nearly a quarter-century of island-living has done nothing to dim his internalized attitude toward others and his belief in the superiority of Englishmen and their proper place at the top of whatever hierarchy they may find themselves in.</p>
<p>Luckily for our Englishman, the &ldquo;slave&rdquo; is very aware of his role and jumps in with gusto, as evidenced by the passage where they meet.</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;[…] and he came nearer and nearer, kneeling down every ten or twelve steps, in token of acknowledgment for saving his life.  I smiled at him, and looked pleasantly, and beckoned to him to come still nearer; at length he came close to me; and then he kneeled down again, kissed the ground, and laid his head upon the ground, and taking me by the foot, set my foot upon his head; this, it seems, was in token of swearing to be my slave for ever.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>I mean, obviously, this is hugely convenient, because our hero is doing the slave a favor of allowing him to be a slave, which he so clearly desperately wishes to be, in order to express his eternal gratitude to the obviously superior Englishman. It gets even more uncomfortable when he describes the man he&rsquo;s acquired. The description is basically slave-owner porn, reading more like the description of a beast of burden or a racehorse.</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;He was a comely, handsome fellow, perfectly well made, with straight, strong limbs, not too large; tall, and well-shaped; and, as I reckon, about twenty-six years of age.  He had a very good countenance, not a fierce and surly aspect, but seemed to have something very manly in his face; and yet he had all the sweetness and softness of a European in his countenance, too, especially when he smiled.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>He is saved from ugliness by having aspects of the Continent about him, thankfully. It goes on at length like this, ending two pages later in a repetition of the passage above, assuring the reader that the fealty is nearly entirely the idea of the slave.</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;At last he lays his head flat upon the ground, close to my foot, and sets my other foot upon his head, as he had done before; and after this made all the signs to me of subjection, servitude, and submission imaginable, to let me know how he would serve me so long as he lived.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>So porn-y. It reads like a teenage boy’s dream journal about ruling an island. On top  of that, we are reassured that, having found a new God to worship in the person of our narrator, Friday has no desires. No want to return to his people. Or to his wife or family. He is content to be with and to learn from his new God.</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;I began really to love the creature; and on his side I believe he loved me more than it was possible for him ever to love anything before&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>The love is mutual, but his is a love for a beast, whereas Friday&rsquo;s is the adoration of a God.</p>
<ol></ol><p>When more people show up, captives he and Friday rescue from cannibals and others who escape a mutiny that ends in shipwreck, our narrator reflects on his position, after over 27 years on the island.</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;My island was now peopled, and I thought myself very rich in subjects; and it was a merry reflection, which I frequently made, how like a king I looked.  First of all, the whole country was my own property, so that I had an undoubted right of dominion.  Secondly, my people were perfectly subjected—I was absolutely lord and lawgiver—they all owed their lives to me, and were ready to lay down their lives, if there had been occasion for it, for me. &rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>Again, this is like young-adult fiction, massaging the ego of the reader. It goes on at length like this, with the narrator expressing amazement at his own magnanimity in allowing everyone to practice the religion they preferred (and, of course, Friday, absolutely prefers the religion of our narrator).</p>
<p>He, of course, inherits the ship of the crew who he and Friday saved—because of course they would just give him everything in thanks. There are many passages of this sort, assuring the reader that everything truly is going to work out perfectly well for Crusoe.</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;He anticipated my proposals by telling me that both he and the ship, if recovered, should be wholly directed and commanded by me in everything; and if the ship was not recovered, he would live and die with me in what part of the world soever I would send him; and the two other men said the same.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>It&rsquo;s nice to be super-rich and only temporarily inconvenienced rather than made destitute or a slave (again, though the first time was nearly inconceivable).</p>
<p>An overland trip to bring his riches back to England from Madrid is kind of tacked on to the end of the book. He ends up with a tremendous fortune, with no-one cheating him out of anything and the world seemingly showering him with goods. Also, his overland journey has adventures, but he loses nothing. Also, the island is obviously acknowledged as belonging to him. He owns it and everyone who lives on it. He even <span class="quote-inline">&ldquo;sent seven women, being such as I found proper for service, or for wives to such as would take them,&rdquo;</span> breeding people like he did his goats when he still lived there.</p>
<p>The book shows its age, having no lasting philosophical statement that survives in the modern age. The writing style is convoluted and the prose is often quite childish in concept. I wouldn&rsquo;t read anything by Defoe again.</p>
<p>I&rsquo;ve included <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3912">notes, citations and errata</a> in a separate post.</p>
</div></dd>
<dt class="field"><span id="World">World Made by Hand (2008)</span></dt>
<dd><div class=" "><p>by <em>James Howard Kunstler</em></p>
<p>This book is the first of several novels fictionalizing a world as envisioned in <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3938">The Long Emergency</a>, a non-fiction account of the coming end of cheap oil and its many repercussions for a world nearly exclusively predicated on it. In this novel, the nearly complete unavailability of fossil fuels was engendered not by a natural lack of easy resources, but by nuclear attacks on Washington and Los Angeles (vaguely hinted at, with no clear enemy blamed) and a kind of super-flu that wiped out a lot of people and put an end to any semblance of shared, national-level infrastructure.</p>
<p>The story is of Robert Ehrlich, who lives in Union Grove, New York (fictional, but within a couple days&rsquo; march of Albany). He&rsquo;s a form sales executive turned carpenter who lost his wife and daughter to the flu and his son Daniel to wanderlust many years ago. The town of Union Grove has a decent water supply, but very sporadic electricity—it&rsquo;s nearly nonexistent and therefore completely unreliable, more of a curiosity of a time long past. They grow some food, cook with wood, etc. Though they still live in the houses of a more modern past, they make very little use of any of the more advanced accoutrements.</p>
<p>To the north of the town is an encampment of former bikers and ne&rsquo;er-do-wells who&rsquo;ve monopolized the business of reclamation and re-selling of goods stripped from abandoned—and some, not-quite-yet-abandoned—houses and businesses. The place is called Karptown and is run by a miscreant straight out of the Mad Max movies named Wayne Karp.</p>
<p>Also near the town is a fully self-sufficient plantation run by Stephen Bullock, who is basically a lord of many serfs, but pretty benevolent. This organization is not too far-fetched and is quite likely to be one of the types of cultures that survives—as long as the ruler stays benevolent, the group stays relatively small and manageable and the community is successful without any debilitating tragedies that would throw it out of equilibrium.</p>
<p>The final group is a bunch of highly capable religious travelers akin to the Amish, but nomadic and far less averse to technology, headed by Brother Jobe. He settles on the area, having traveled up from Pennsylvania, where things are <span class="quote-inline">&ldquo;much worse&rdquo;</span>. He doesn&rsquo;t want to take things up, per se, but he does think that the local townsfolk have been somewhat shiftless and directionless, leaving them open to the predations of Wayne Karp, among others.</p>
<p>Within this structure, the basic plot points are as follows:</p>
<ul>
<li>One of Wayne&rsquo;s band kills a promising local young man from town while Robert doesn&rsquo;t exactly look on, but is utterly helpless to do anything after the fact.</li>
<li>Jobe thinks Karp&rsquo;s band should be punished.</li>
<li>Jobe and Robert visit Bullock—also the local magistrate—and ask if he&rsquo;ll help bring Karp and his crew to heel.</li>
<li>Bullock is more interested in finding out what happened to four of his men and a trading vessel that he sent down Albany way.</li>
<li>They agree to help, but only if he sends supplies (lengths of pipe) to help them repair the town&rsquo;s water supply. They do this and water-service is restored, restoring also a bit of self-confidence and faith in the townspeople.</li>
<li>The young man&rsquo;s wife and child move in to Robert&rsquo;s house to &ldquo;keep house&rdquo;. There is really no other choice, though several townspeople purse their lips in disapproval that stems from a way of life that no longer applies.</li>
<li>Robert and several of Jobe&rsquo;s acolytes head down to Albany to investigate.</li>
<li>They discover that Albany is all buy lawless and in the hands of an even greater miscreant than Wayne Karp. Robert learns of the brutal efficiency of Jobe&rsquo;s men—who, while they&rsquo;ve mostly found Jesus, are also almost all former military.</li>
<li>They return with the four men and having eliminated the threat to river trade by shooting nearly the entire gang who&rsquo;d coopted it for themselves.</li>
<li>Bullock celebrates their return with a giant party that empties out the town.</li>
<li>Karp&rsquo;s men come down to rob the town and also to see if they can find some &ldquo;action&rdquo; from any ladies who didn&rsquo;t attend the party (Robert&rsquo;s new roommate being one of them).</li>
<li>On the same day, Jobe and his men set up a barbershop that isn&rsquo;t quite voluntary and shave a bunch of beards from unwilling customers.</li>
<li><div>Robert and the pastor (Loren) arrest Jobe, who comes along relatively quietly and lets himself be put in jail.<ol></ol></div></li>
<li>&nbsp;</li>
<li>Robert and Loren head up to Karptown to arrest Karp. Things go predictably—he says &ldquo;no&rdquo;—and Robert gets covered in buckets of shit, but only after Loren&rsquo;s asshole is torn open by brutal paddling. They make their way back to town, with the help of some of Jobe&rsquo;s men.</li>
<li>Jobe&rsquo;s men go up to Karptown to collect Karp and return with him, placing him in a cell next to Jobe&rsquo;s. Minor, one of the men who&rsquo;d proven so essential on the trip to Albany was unfortunately killed in the raid.</li>
<li>Jobe is praying feverishly.</li>
<li>The next morning, Jobe is no longer in his cell, but the door is still chained shut. Karp&rsquo;s cell is also still locked, but he&rsquo;d dead, with a bullet-wound through his eye that <em>exactly matches</em> the one Minor had suffered the night before.</li>
<li>Robert learns that Minor was Jobe&rsquo;s son.</li>
<li>Robert finds Jobe on the grounds he and his people had settled on: the old High School that he&rsquo;d purchased and which his people were fixing up to house their &ldquo;queen bee&rdquo;, a bizarrely and grotesquely fat woman who seems to have the gift of preternatural sight…but that seems to be a plot line that will be pursued more fully in subsequent novels.</li>
<li>They talk and Jobe is super-mysterious and also just kind of disappears, leading Robert to wonder what sort of supernatural stuff is going on. The &ldquo;eye for an eye&rdquo; stuff gives him quite a bit of pause, especially in his fraught condition, having hardly slept, drunk too much whiskey and still being desperately worried about his friend Loren, who&rsquo;d undergone surgery the night before.</li>
<li>The book ends several months later, with Robert in charge of the town and Loren having recovered more or less fully. Karp&rsquo;s gang is subdued while Jobe&rsquo;s crew is doing well on their own, as are Bullock&rsquo;s people.</li></ul><p>On a side note, I was quite surprised to learn that Kunstler doesn&rsquo;t know how to use past tenses correctly. He very, very often uses &ldquo;did&rdquo; when he definitely meant to use &ldquo;had done&rdquo;, which I&rsquo;d taken to be a more modern affectation of young authors whose education had gone missing. I&rsquo;d never noticed his online work to suffer from the same affliction, so I&rsquo;m somewhat mystified as to the reason behind it.</p>
<p>Some authors use the incorrect form in dialogue, in order to impart an authenticity to the speech patterns of their characters. The patois of upstate New York—near Albany, where the book takes place—most definitely fails to distinguish between verb forms in nearly any way, placing all of the legwork required to determine when and if something happened squarely on the listener.</p>
<p>Confusion abounds, but what can you do when no-one can be bothered? Perhaps this curtailed version of English is what we&rsquo;ve got to work with from here on out. Perhaps Kunstler&rsquo;s subtle point is that the World Made By Hand won&rsquo;t have time for such niceties. The theme of the book is a world that has been simplified by nuclear attacks and influenza epidemics from our high-tech quasi-nightmare to a much more bucolic and brutal lifestyle. Perhaps the language followed suit.</p>
<p>I&rsquo;ve included <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3937">notes, citations and errata</a> in a separate post.</p>
</div></dd>
<dt class="field"><span id="Emergency">The Long Emergency: Surviving the End of Oil, Climate Change, and Other  Converging Catastrophes of the Twenty-first Century (2005)</span></dt>
<dd><div class=" "><p>by <em>James Howard Kunstler</em></p>
<p>This is a non-fiction book-length discussion of the end of oil—and the massive impact this will have on a society nearly completely predicated on cheap, non-renewable energy produced over millions of years. It ranges wide and far and includes intelligent and well-written analyses of all of the parts of our world that will have to change—whether we want them to or not. He discusses car culture, suburbs, poorly designed societies, climate change, big finance, the mortgage collapse (before it happened),  pandemics (before it happened in the west), and much, much more.</p>
<p>The book starts with a bleak but accurate assessment of American society—from hyper-consumerism to happy motoring to ex-ex-exurbs. It continues with a discussion of what oil is and where it comes from—oil in particular because its the most flexible of the various energy sources currently available to us—and even of others that we can currently conceive of.</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Oil is an amazing substance. It stores a tremendous amount of energy per weight and volume. It is easy to transport. It stores easily at regular air temperature in unpressurized metal tanks, and it can sit there indefinitely without degrading. You can pump it through a pipe, you can send it all over the world in ships, you can haul it around in trains, cars, and trucks, you can even fly it in tanker planes and refuel other airplanes in flight […]&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>The book is split into section after prophetic section, discussing how nearly everything in our modern society is possible thanks to the high-density energy of cheap fossil fuels. The United States depends on natural gas for heating and producing many of its resources—including nearly all of the fertilizer without which not a single crop would grow.</p>
<p>Kunstler defines what Peak Oil actually means: it&rsquo;s the point at which the world has used up half of the oil supply in the world. He points out that the half we&rsquo;ve used is also very much the more easily obtained half—and that much of the second half won&rsquo;t be able to be obtained at all. It won&rsquo;t be worth it, not only economically, but in the more prosaic and realistic measure of how much energy it would take to extract it. While the energy needed to harvest fossil fuels used to be a couple of dozen to one, we&rsquo;re now lucky to get two or three to one.</p>
<p>The U.S. hit peak oil nearly 45 years ago now; it has never again produced as much oil as it did then. It has also long since hit peak natural-gas. Kunstler wrote his book before shale-oil and fracking took off, but he predicted it perfectly. That the US went for shale oil and fracking is <em>indicative</em> that we&rsquo;ve hit Peak Oil. Otherwise, no-one would ever have developed such an invasive extraction technology with such poor yields and margins.</p>
<p>There are still those who claim that Peak Oil doesn&rsquo;t matter—they try to explain it away as peak consumption rather than peak production, but that&rsquo;s ridiculous. It&rsquo;s like someone who loses their job saying that there&rsquo;s no problem with losing their salary. When you meet them a month later, they say they&rsquo;re doing fine: they&rsquo;ve started robbing houses instead.</p>
<p>With most of the world having passed the peak, there&rsquo;s no longer a way of controlling the price of oil because no-one has excess capacity to throw at the market to bring prices back down. That explains the whipsawing of prices over the years. Kunstler also predicted the fragility of fracking—witness the complete implosion of the industry after oil prices cratered due to the world self-isolating for Covid-19.</p>
<p>He doesn&rsquo;t talk about just oil, though. He also writes about climate change…and pandemics, another thing that could easily trigger the Long Emergency.</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;At the same time, the world is overdue for an extreme influenza epidemic. The last major outbreak was the 1918 Spanish influenza, which killed 50 million people worldwide and changed the course of history. […] Disease will certainly play a larger role in the Long Emergency than many can now imagine. An epidemic could paralyze social and economic systems, interrupt global trade, and bring down governments.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>Perhaps it wasn&rsquo;t such a leap to predict something like this—Kunstler was certainly not alone in doing so—but the timing was just right for reading this book. He&rsquo;s really a very gifted writer, weaving a convincing, if sobering, picture of the future of humanity,</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Our ability to resist the environmental corrective of disease will probably prove to have been another temporary boon of the cheap-oil age, like air conditioning and lobsters flown daily from Maine to the buffets of Las Vegas. So much of what we construe to be among our entitlements to perpetual progress may prove to have been a strange, marvelous, and anomalous moment in the planet’s history.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>He weaves similarly evocative pictures of just how impossible our world currently is—especially when you realize that the free-energy bonanza on which it rests is winding down.</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Products then moved around the globe in a highly rationalized system, not unlike the oil allocation system, using immense vessels, automated port facilities, and truck-scaled shipping containers at a minuscule cost-per-unit of whatever was made and transported. Shirts or coffeemakers manufactured 12,000 miles away could be shipped to Wal-Marts all over America and sold cheaply.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>He points out that so many economic miracles and turnarounds were almost always due to a newly found bonanza of oil or natural gas. For example, England&rsquo;s turnaround in the 80s wasn&rsquo;t because  of Thatcher&rsquo;s economic acumen, but purely because they&rsquo;d just come into an embarrassment of riches in the North Sea.</p>
<p>His holistic vision encompasses also the financialization of global economics, describing the fire sale of an industrialized society built on fossil fuels as <span class="quote-inline">&ldquo;like a convoluted liquidation sale of the accrued wealth of two hundred years of industrial society for the benefit of a handful of financial buccaneers,&rdquo;</span></p>
<p>He&rsquo;s much more familiar with his home country and takes them especially to task as being utterly unable to think for themselves. </p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;In effect, Americans threw away their communities in order to save a few dollars on hair dryers and plastic food storage tubs, never stopping to reflect on what they were destroying.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>The world  shows itself ideologically incapable of even considering the obvious conclusions based on available data. Instead, faith in the ever-providing markets is the order of the day.</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Because the oil peak phenomenon essentially cancels out further industrial growth of the kind we are used to, its implications lie radically outside their economic paradigm. So the oil peak phenomenon has been discounted to about zero among conventional economists, who assume that “market signals” about oil supplies will inevitably trigger innovation, which, in turn, will cause new technology to materialize and enable further growth.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>The problem is more acute in the U.S., which has taken an oil-drenched lifestyle to an unparalleled extreme. Other advanced societies are also dependent on oil, but it&rsquo;s still easily possible to live a life even with reduced fossil-fuel supplies. That is, the cities are still livable and can be navigated by foot, bicycle or public transportation, food is produced reasonably sustainably and locally (e.g. without natural-gas-based fertilizers, because <span class="quote-inline">&ldquo;[n]inety-five percent of the nitrogenous fertilizers used in America are made out of natural gas&rdquo;</span>). Not so in the U.S. Just as an example, Kunstler writes that by 1974 <span class="quote-inline">&ldquo;85 percent of Americans drove to work every day.&rdquo;</span> and that <span class="quote-inline">&ldquo;[b]y the 1990s, American households were making a record eleven separate car trips a day running errands and chauffeuring children around.&rdquo;</span></p>
<p>The U.S. is in deep trouble, much deeper than other places. This is also due to a complete political paralysis and fear of telling the truth or even of acknowledging reality.</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;No politician wants to tell voters that the American Dream has been canceled for a lack of energy resources. The U.S. economy would disintegrate. So, whichever party is in power has tended to ignore the issue or change the subject, or spin it into the realm of delusion&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>Kunstler stumbles in two areas: The first is foreign policy in the Middle East in the 70s and 80s, where his lens is still too U.S.-centric, as hard as that is to believe. The other is the short chapter on racism, where he&rsquo;s got some decent points to make, but still ends up making them as a boorish, victim-blaming old white guy who doesn&rsquo;t quite believe in systemic racism.</p>
<p>For example, he describes the 21st-century war on Islam as <span class="quote-inline">&ldquo;[w]e are therefore at war with that community—not because of our choosing but because it has declared war on us.&rdquo;</span> It&rsquo;s understood that the book was written only a few years after 9/11, but it&rsquo;s not like that was the first act of war—Kunstler could have mentioned something along those lines.</p>
<p>Just as another example, here&rsquo;s how he wrote about the WMD inspections in Iraq:</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Since the UN team was prevented from completing the search, the United States had to do it in person. The fact that nothing was found by American forces after the 2003 invasion does not prove that we didn’t have to look.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>He fails to note that this is because vassal nations must be brought to heel and occupation is the punishment/answer. The logic is so internalized. </p>
<p>Kunstler is at his best when he&rsquo;s calmly expounding on his main thesis: We are shredding through millions of years of stored non-renewable energy in a couple of centuries. The society we built with it is utterly unsustainable when that energy is no longer available in that form.</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Natural hydrocarbons represent millennia of stored solar power collected by plants and distilled by geologic accident. The flare given off by igniting an ounce of charcoal starter lasts a few seconds, but the energy was derived from, say, a prehistoric tree fern absorbing sunshine for nine years.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Also, once these complex systems and their subsystems halt their operations, restarting them may range from difficult to impossible—the Humpty Dumpty syndrome.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>At the time the book was written, fuel cells were all the rage, in particular fuel-cell cars. In the ensuing 15 years, we&rsquo;ve instead seen the rise of the electric car—Kunstler&rsquo;s devastating critique of the lack of viability of building cars at all—rescuing the <em>happy motoring culture</em> without the fossil fuels—applies just as well to electric cars. He described Tesla 10 years before it even produced a single car.</p>
<p>As Kunstler points out, a lot of the cures for the end of cheap energy are based on still having access to that cheap energy. This will be the case, even after peak oil or peak natural-gas, for quite some time. That is, there is a certain (limited) supply of still-cheap energy with which we could possibly transition to something that no longer requires us to have access to cheap-energy stores—or at least we should have access to renewable cheap-energy stores. Unfortunately, as long as we have the cheap supply, we continue to spend it uselessly, on frivolities, rather than <em>investing</em> it on a bridge to a more sustainable future.</p>
<p>There is a fantastic section where Kunstler explains the history of the U.S. from the 1970s until 2004 purely in terms of drivers based on the need for oil. And oil it has to be, because of the properties outlined above: it&rsquo;s very portable. As Kunstler points out, nuclear fission can&rsquo;t solve many of society&rsquo;s needs because <span class="quote-inline">&ldquo;most of America’s energy needs are for things that electricity can’t do very well, if at all&rdquo;</span>.</p>
<p>Unlike other visions of the future (e.g. Hariri&rsquo;s book), Kunstler addresses climate change seriously and in-depth. He discusses the different regions of the U.S., dissecting the problems each region faces and the degree to which it could survive a long emergency. Kunstler&rsquo;s region in the Northeast would survive the best. The Southwest, with its utter lack of arable land and water, would fare the worst. It would have to be abandoned in any halfway-realistic scenario.</p>
<p>As already noted above, Kunstler sees quite well that a potential trigger for the Long Emergency could be virus. Reading this book now really makes you think whether the U.S. has been accelerated into a stage of the Long Emergency that the rest of the world has been able to avoid (for now). Kunstler writes,</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;It takes seven months or more to create, test, manufacture, and distribute a vaccine developed in direct response to a new virus, and by that time the disease can burn through global populations. If a pandemic broke out today, hospital facilities would be overwhelmed. Nurses and doctors would be infected along with the rest of the population.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>Kunstler puts the nail in America&rsquo;s coffin by noting—again—that the U.S. is <em>ideologically incapable</em> of doing anything about any of the myriad problems it has created for itself. The U.S. also has made many problems for itself that the nearly all of the rest of its contemporaries have avoided (excluding the UK, which at least has an NHS, despite its attempts to dismantle it).</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;[…] we in America flatter ourselves to think that we are above this kind of general catastrophe—because our technologic prowess during the cheap-oil fiesta was so marvelous that all future problems are (supposedly) guaranteed to be solved by similar applications of ingenuity</p>
<p>&ldquo;[…]</p>
<p>&ldquo;Americans didn’t question the validity of the suburban sprawl economy. They accepted it at face value as the obvious logical outcome of their hopes and dreams and defended it viciously against criticism. They steadfastly ignored its salient characteristic: that it had no future either as an economy or as a living arrangement. Each further elaboration of the suburban system made it less likely to survive any change in conditions,&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote><p>Other countries think this, to some degree, but not nearly the degree to which the U.S. does. They were at least smart enough to make backup plans. For example, many European countries retain a dense, <em>largely electrical</em>, rail network that they use for at least 50% of their freight—and which could be ramped up to replace the capacity lost when trucks are no longer able to get enough fuel or the roads can no longer be sufficiently maintained. Kunstler writes, <span class="quote-inline">&ldquo;it’s worth reiterating that a failure to get comprehensive passenger rail service going will be a sign of how fundamentally unserious we are as a society.&rdquo;</span></p>
<p>And what is the main driver of the world&rsquo;s problems? Big finance, big corporations, globalization, the complete disavowal of national allegiance by society&rsquo;s biggest members.</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Globalism was operated by oligarchical corporations on the gigantic scale, made possible by cheap oil. By “oligarchical” I mean that power was vested in small numbers of people running large organizations who were not accountable for their actions to many of the people who were subject to those actions. <strong>By “corporation,” I mean a group enterprise given the legal status of a “person,” with “rights,” but in fact devoid of any human qualities of ethics, humility, mercy, duty, or loyalty that would constrain those rights.</strong> (Emphasis added.)&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>We see this playing out right now with corporations in not just the U.S. (e.g. German car manufacturers) are vacuuming up bailout money despite not having paid taxes in their supposed home countries for years. A particularly egregious example is Carnival Cruise Lines, which sees fit to incorporate in Panama, but chirpily takes bailout money, all the while promulgating a business model that hasn&rsquo;t a chance in hell of working in a post-Covid-19 world.</p>
<p>Kunstler points out the moral bankruptcy of the conceit that a corporation like Wal-Mart simply &ldquo;competes&rdquo; with local businesses on an even footing.</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;Wal-Mart was considered the theoretical equal of Bob the appliance store owner, and if Bob happened to lose in the retail competition because he couldn’t order 50,000 coffee-makers at a crack from a factory 12,000 miles away in Hangzhou, and receive a deep discount for being such an important customer, well, it wasn’t as though he hadn’t been given the chance.</p>
<p>&ldquo;&rdquo;</p>
<ol></ol><p>&ldquo;</p>
<p>&ldquo;[…]</p>
<p>&ldquo;One group had all the cheap labor and another group had all the capital, and for a while one group made all the things that the other group “consumed.” Thus, comparative advantage became, for a time, a con game strictly for the benefit of large corporations, which ended up enjoying all the advantages while the localities sucked up the costs.&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote><p>On the back on this kind of feedback loop that benefitted the right people, more and more of the privileged—the elite—would take part in an orgy of investment that had nothing to with any useful economic activity.</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Finance came to be viewed as a productive activity itself rather than a means to promote production. The public was no longer buying stock to invest in enterprises that would pay dividends over time, but merely because one could get rich from buying and selling stocks.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>Not only that, but whatever real economy (e.g. manufacturing and agriculture) wasn&rsquo;t replaced with finance was then replaced with a &ldquo;service industry&rdquo; instead.</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;[…] the myth of a service economy to replace the old manufacturing economy. I say “myth” because it was essentially absurd. It was like the old joke about the village that prospered because the inhabitants were all employed taking in each other’s laundry.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>On that backs of all of these poor decisions, Kunstler saw the housing/mortgage crisis coming in 2004 already. He wasn&rsquo;t alone—many other non-mainstream economists, like Dean Baker, did as well—but it&rsquo;s to his credit that he saw it then, and wrote so eloquently and presciently on the shape it would take. E.g. <span class="quote-inline">&ldquo;By the time you read this, it is very likely that the housing bubble will have begun to come to grief.&rdquo;</span> I read that sentence a dozen years after the housing bubble had unequivocally triggered the largest world global financial crisis the world had even seen. It remains to be seen whether the global stagnation engendered by Covid-19 measures tops it.</p>
<p>This is all to say that the U.S. is basically running the world in a fashion that doesn&rsquo;t accept limits—it simply ignores them, even when obviously imposed by physics. This is a fantasy world sustained only temporarily by cheap oil. This basic attitude affects <em>everything</em>….and negatively. As long as enough of the people that matter believe this fantasy—or profit from it—then it will continue, by pure inertia. It will only stop when it finally hits a hard limit. And that limit will not be kind, it will not be gentle. Thus ensues the Long Emergency.</p>
<p>I&rsquo;ve included <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3938">notes, citations and errata</a> in a separate post.</p>
</div></dd>
<dt class="field"><span id="Scarlet"><a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/21970">The Scarlet Plague</a> (1915)</span></dt>
<dd><div class=" "><p>by <em>Jack London</em></p>
<p>This is a short story told by the survivor of a great plague that destroyed mankind. The plague happened in 2013 (making it a speculative fiction/science-fiction tale in 1915) and the tale is told sixty years later by Granser—a former professor of English—to his grandsons—unutterably crude savages who are, to be fair, much better-suited to the world in which they all find themselves than Granser with his university education.</p>
<p>The disease was called the Scarlet Plague because of its distinguishing initial symptom—a reddening of the face that foretold a death within hours. After that, sufferers first lost all feeling in their feet, a numbness that crept upward over the next few hours until it seized and stopped their hearts. Death was unavoidable. The only survivors were immune from the start—and those numbered fewer than one in a million. The disease incubated for several days before manifesting itself and killing its victim, allowing a ferocious spread with a shockingly high R-value.</p>
<p>The disease did not discriminate based on skill or knowledge—it tore an irreparable swath through mankind until the entire population of the western and former United States numbered only a few hundred people 3 generations later. Granser speculates that there are no other people left on Earth, but he has no way of knowing. Without technology, without electricity…the world is once again much, much larger than it was.</p>
<p>The grandsons are a mixed bag: Edwin seems the most willing to listen to and try to learn from Granser while Hoo-hoo and especially Hare-Lip are nearly demented idiots bent only on dominating their mean and small environs. Even when they seem to listen to and take Granser&rsquo;s advice, they pervert it through the lens of the here-and-now and lose his message entirely.</p>
<p>London discusses the so-called impedance mismatch between his culture and theirs—separated by only a few decades but yielding an already hopelessly unbridgeable gulf. They understand little of what he says unless he breaks it down to their guttural and severely limited patois that comprises only the concepts necessary for survival. This is understandable on their part, but bespeaks the doom of any plan to retain the knowledge that mankind once had.</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;<strong>Granser:</strong> You must tell them that when water is made hot by fire, there resides in it a wonderful thing called steam, which is stronger than ten thousand men and which can do all man&rsquo;s work for him.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>The story briefly describes the state of mankind and the world after the plague, but it primarily tells of the coming of the plague and the ensuing fall of all of man&rsquo;s works. With a plague so deadly, there was no gradual loss of knowledge or services, no time to prepare backup plans or storehouses of either supplies or knowledge.</p>
<p>Granser tells of his travels and long loneliness before he discovered his first people—a couple composed of Chauffeur and Vesta Van Warden. He is a large, mean, and terrible man who has her as a house drudge, brood sow, and chattel. She is the descendant of the former rulers of the world. In the post-plague world, their roles are reversed. His physical brutishness grants him power over here, where once the brutishness of societal convention conferred upon her a power inordinate to her physical or intellectual capability. It is unclear to what degree London shares Granser&rsquo;s adulation of this former nobility/royalty—I can&rsquo;t tell if he&rsquo;s being ironic.</p>
<p>At any rate, mankind bred itself to about 400 crude and fallen people 60 years after the onset of the plague, with little to no hope that they would at any point be able to make use of the storehouse of books and knowledge that Granser had set aside for them in a cave. It is his life&rsquo;s work, but, being in his late 80s, his life is coming to an end, with no hope in sight that anyone will be able to retain anything of what he would have been able to impart from his knowledge of a world that once was.</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;All man&rsquo;s toil upon the planet was just so much foam. He domesticated the serviceable animals, destroyed the hostile ones, and cleared the land of its wild vegetation. And then he passed, and the flood of primordial life rolled back again, sweeping his handiwork away&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>Instead, the tribes listen to medicine men who send around &ldquo;death sticks&rdquo; and other superstitious tripe. Mankind will leave the Earth in a sort of peace and will need dozens of thousands of millennia to re-learn what it once knew, step by painful step.</p>
<ol></ol><p>Or maybe mankind won&rsquo;t be so lucky and will instead be eaten by the mountain lions that are making their way down, closer and closer to the ocean, as intimated right at the end by Edwin&rsquo;s observation that the wild horses had come down out of the mountains to escape their predators.</p>
<p>Here London leaves us with a 50/50: is Edwin&rsquo;s  observation about the horses combined with a greater willingness to learn from Granser a sign that he is sharp enough to quantum-leap his tribe back to a semblance of civilization? Or are the mountain lions a metaphor for the inexorable voracity of an unpitying nature that will finish the job that the Scarlet Plague started?</p>
<p>London&rsquo;s vision is somewhat limited by his having written in 1915: He writes of the rich in their dirigibles and advanced motorcars and mansions; he doesn&rsquo;t envision anything fancier than canned goods for foodstuffs. He is also unavoidably a man of his eugenic times. He writes of the &ldquo;laborers&rdquo;,</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;In the midst of our civilization, down in our slums and labor-ghettos, we had bred a race of barbarians, of savages; and now, in the time of our calamity, they turned upon us like the wild beasts they were and destroyed us. And they destroyed themselves as well.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>In 2020, that&rsquo;s on its face quite shockingly racist, but it&rsquo;s perhaps only more overt than the castes we retain today. Though we purport to have eliminated them, they survive in the sinews and veins of our society, more dangerous and powerful because they are so internalized that too few even question them. The argument today is the same, though delivered with perhaps more subtle casuistry. So-called American civilization today bases largely on the notion that the rich are rich because they deserve it; the poor as well.</p>
<p>Also, as noted above, it&rsquo;s not clear how London personally felt about that line of argument (or whether he&rsquo;s promoting anything at all). In an earlier passage, he wrote the following, which seems quite a bit more critical of the way his world worked (and, quite honestly, how ours still does),</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Our food-getters were called freemen. This was a joke. We of the ruling classes owned all the land, all the machines, everything. These food-getters were our slaves. We took almost all the food they got, and left them a little so that they might eat, and work, and get us more food […]&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>I was impressed by London&rsquo;s mastery. It was a damned good story—I had no idea he counted among the best of the fantasy writers. The plague of 1917/1918 followed on the heels of his having published this story, which makes him eerily prescient, to boot.</p>
<p>I&rsquo;ve included <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3980">notes, citations and errata</a> in a separate post.</p>
</div></dd>
<dt class="field"><span id="Machine"><a href="http://www.visbox.com/prajlich/forster.html">The Machine Stops</a> by <cite>E.M. Forster</cite> (1909)</span></dt>
<dd><div class=" "><p>by <em>E.M. Forster</em></p>
<p>I first read <a href="http://www.visbox.com/prajlich/forster.html">this short story</a> at the beginning of 2019, but recently re-read it. In these pandemic days, even more of the story resonated with me than on the first reading.</p>
<p>The story is about a woman named Vashanti and he son Kuno, who live on a future Earth where The Machine has long since taken up the caretaking of mankind—so that people can concentrate on getting and sharing &lsquo;ideas&rdquo;.</p>
<p>Each person is contained in its own little pod. One room for everything. The bed and bath slide out of the floor when needed. Medical equipment descends from the ceiling.</p>
<p>All communication is remote. People almost never see one another physically.</p>
<p>Each person has exactly one book—they all have the same book. It is <span class="quote-inline">&ldquo;The Book of the Machine&rdquo;</span> and it contains everything that anyone would ever need to know about how the world works or how to communicate with The Machine.</p>
<p>Mankind thinks itself free of religion, but it has replaced its classic, irrational religions with a supposedly rational one that ends up in people worshiping The Machine. No-one knows how The Machine works; all of its mechanisms are automated and have been so as long as anyone can remember.</p>
<p>The world has been homogenized.</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Something &ldquo;good enough&rdquo; had long since been accepted by our race.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>The following examples illustrate how our supposedly advanced civilization was pretty easily predicted by Forster a century removed from it. How unique and creative can it possibly be if he was able to predict it so well?</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Vashanti&rdquo;s next move was to turn off the isolation switch, and all the accumulations of the last three minutes burst upon her. The room was filled with the noise of bells, and speaking-tubes. What was the new food like? Could she recommend it? Has she had any ideas lately? Might one tell her one&rsquo;s own ideas? Would she make an engagement to visit the public nurseries at an early date?&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>Does this not describe how a phone or device acts when it returns from isolation? Is this not the experience of an average social-media user &ldquo;coming back&rdquo; to their phone after a temporary absence?</p>
<p>Amazingly, Forster&rsquo;s predictions of video-conferencing are also spot-on:</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The clumsy system of public gatherings had been long since abandoned; neither Vashti nor her audience stirred from their rooms. Seated in her armchair she spoke, while they in their armchairs heard her, fairly well, and saw her, fairly well.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>That the story nails the self-isolation of 2020 due to COVID-19 explains why the story resonated for me more on re-reading now. In our modern case, this live of video-conferencing applies only to the upper-level caste, while lower castes continue to work as usual. We don&rsquo;t have The Machine (yet). In Forster’s vision, the “Machine” took care of day-to-day minutia for everyone, with seemingly no castes left over from the previous civilization. Or, perhaps more accurately, the non-upper-class castes have been eliminated.</p>
<p>In this next section, Forster somehow manages to capture the superficiality of TED Talks nearly a century before they even existed.</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Her lecture, which lasted ten minutes, was well received, and at its conclusion she and many of her audience listened to a lecture on the sea; there were ideas to be got from the sea; the speaker had donned a respirator and visited it lately.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>The listeners are flighty and don&rsquo;t really pay attention to anything specifically—they sip widely but shallowly, adding nothing of value on their own. The lecture on the sea above has absolutely nothing to do with Vashanti&rsquo;s lecture. That reflects our social-media feeds quite well—like hummingbirds, many flit from topic to topic, guided by The Machine.</p>
<ol></ol><p>Hell, Forster even foresaw the delivery culture—albeit here he also foresaw everyone getting access to it, which isn&rsquo;t the case with our modern version of The Machine. In our version, the workings of The Machine are still very much run on the backs of manual labor provided by an underclass.</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;[…] the civilization that had mistaken the functions of the system, and had used it for bringing people to things, instead of for bringing things to people.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>Forster also foresaw the homogenization of travel destinations—our cities have &ldquo;tourist areas&rdquo; that aim to make people comfortable by providing services that they would have at home. There&rsquo;s a Starbucks; there&rsquo;s a McDonalds; there&rsquo;s a theme park.</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;What was the good of going to Peking when it was just like Shrewsbury? Why return to Shrewsbury when it would all be like Peking?&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>Finally, there is the erosion of ideas and information, recycling well-worn thought and denigrating original thought until no-one knows anything of value anymore. Experts are suspect; expertise is evil; information is best when its already known—common sense.</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;And even the lecturers acquiesced when they found that a lecture on the sea was none the less stimulating when compiled out of other lectures that had already been delivered on the same subject. &ldquo;Beware of first- hand ideas!&rdquo; exclaimed one of the most advanced of them. […] Let your ideas be second-hand, and if possible tenth-hand, for then they will be far removed from that disturbing element − direct observation.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>So we have a society homogenized and reduced and made completely dependent on The Machine. (I wonder whether the world of <em>Wall-E</em> was based, at least in part, on this story?) Forster tells us what happens when The Machine stops after mankind has become inescapably dependent on it.</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Man, the flower of all flesh, the noblest of all creatures visible, man who had once made god in his image, and had mirrored his strength on the constellations, beautiful naked man was dying, strangled in the garments that he had woven.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>I&rsquo;ve included <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3987">notes, citations and errata</a> in a separate post.</p>
</div></dd>
<dt class="field"><span id="Peste">La Peste (1947; fr)</span></dt>
<dd><div class=" "><p>by <em>Albert Camus</em></p>
<p>This is a work of fiction about a plague that takes place in 1947 in the Algerian city of Oran, on the Mediterranean coast. It documents a nearly overwhelmingly deadly disease.</p>
<p>The plague creeps in on little rats&rsquo; feet.</p>
<p>Doctor Rieux finds dead rats in unusual places, in residential buildings, in stairwells. The health and sanitation services confirm that they&rsquo;re killing an increasing number of rats per day, dozens to hundreds. The doctor&rsquo;s building&rsquo;s superintendent dies of a fever. He had engorged and enlarged buboes (lymph nodes). Rieux suspects that the plague has come to town. The good doctor sees other patients with the same symptoms and sounds the alarm, beseeching the medical council for the town to declare a quarantine and to speak the ugly word &ldquo;pestilence&rdquo; or &ldquo;bubonic plague&rdquo;.</p>
<p>The plague is inevitable and does not care whether it is recognized as such or not. It claims victims until, at 30 per day, the town is closed off to the outside world. Rieux&rsquo;s wife had been sent to a sanatorium a few days earlier for an unrelated illness. He, like everyone else, is reduced to communicating with her in short telegrams. Rail travel stops.</p>
<p>Rambert, the journalist, plans an escape that becomes more and more elaborate and prolonged, dragging out for weeks of planning with Gonzales and his two cohorts. He grows closer and closer to Tarrou (a tourist), Rieux, and Grand, who are working night and day to care for patients, sleeping only four hours per night. Their dedication—and Tarrou telling Rambert that Rieux, too, is not able to be with his wife—convinces Rambert to stay and join in the fight against the plague.</p>
<p>The plague drags on for months and months. Castel&rsquo;s serum doesn&rsquo;t work on a young boy/baby, but seems to be able to help some others. Father Paneloux succumbs to a different disease—nature doesn&rsquo;t care about irony.</p>
<p>In one of my favorite scenes, on a hot night in the fall, Tarrou and Rambert go swimming together as Tarrou tells Rieux his life story. I really liked the evocative style in which it was written.</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;Rieux se mit sur le dos et se tint immobile, face au ciel renversé, plein de lune et d’étoiles. Il respira longuement.</p>
<p>&ldquo;[…]</p>
<p>&ldquo;Rieux se retourna, se mit au niveau de son ami, et nagea dans le même rythme. Tarrou avançait avec plus de puissance que lui et il dut précipiter son allure. Pendant quelques minutes, ils avancèrent avec la même cadence et la même vigueur, solitaires, loin du monde, libérés enfin de la ville et de la peste.</p>
<p>&ldquo;[…]</p>
<p>&ldquo;Habillés de nouveau, ils repartirent sans avoir prononcé un mot. Mais ils avaient le même cœur et le souvenir de cette nuit leur était doux.&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote><p>Grand catches the plague, but recovers. God laughs. The plague number start to decline and the people can no longer be held back from celebrating the reopening of the city after nearly ¾ of a year.</p>
<p>The plague takes a few more on its way out, though: Othon (the father of the baby whom Castel could not save) succumbs; Tarrou slips away, through Rieux&rsquo;s fingers. Cottard goes mad because his black-market business will come to an end. Rambert reunites with his wife. Rieux learns of the death of his wife, just days before the gates opened. He has lost his best friend and his wife. God laughs, alone privy to his mad plan.</p>
<p>The plague is inevitable. It takes the course that it wants. Humans can channel it and ameliorate its effects, but they cannot stop it, not before it itself has decided that is finished. &ldquo;It&rsquo;s done when I say it&rsquo;s done,&rdquo; seems to be the motto of a plague, no matter what level of technology man achieves. It is the same with any natural disaster: a tsunami also does not listen to reason. There is no use hating it. It wouldn&rsquo;t care if you did.</p>
<p>Nearly all of the major stages in this novel have been matched blow-for-blow by our own recent and ongoing experience with COVID-19. Denial, desperation, the rich fleeing the city, closing the city down, settling into resigned isolation, travel restrictions, hygiene measures, and so on. The joy at the end, when the plague mysteriously recedes? We can only hope that our story includes this part, as well.</p>
<p>The similarities are many. For example, the book describes the rich fleeing the city, as they did everywhere there were lockdowns (e.g. a large percentage fo NYC&rsquo;s richest population moved themselves north, out of harm&rsquo;s way.</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;On demandait des mesures radicales, on accusait les autorités, et certains qui avaient des maisons au bord de la mer parlaient déjà de s’y retirer.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>The fear sets in:</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;C’est à partir de ce moment que la peur, et la réflexion avec elle, commencèrent.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>The collecting of statistics—also a modern obsession and made much easier by the Internet—and the dawning realization that the plague is real:</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Mais, en somme, il suffit que quelqu’un songeât à faire l’addition. L’addition était consternante. En quelques jours à peine, les cas mortels se multiplièrent et il devint évident pour ceux qui se préoccupaient de ce mal curieux qu’il s’agissait d’une véritable épidémie.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>The matter-of-fact, rational Rieux notifying the hopeful morons on his council that the plague does not care what they think, that the mission is to save people from this calamity, not to pretend that it&rsquo;s less bad than it is and then to regret not having done something sooner.</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;[…] si elle n’est pas stoppée, elle risque de tuer la moitié de la ville avant deux mois. Par conséquent, il importe peu que vous l’appeliez peste ou fièvre de croissance. Il importe seulement que vous l’empêchiez de tuer la moitié de la ville.</p>
<p>&ldquo;[…]</p>
<p>&ldquo;La question, insista Rieux, n’est pas de savoir si les mesures prévues par la loi sont graves mais si elles sont nécessaires pour empêcher la moitié de la ville d’être tuée.&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote><p>Camus eloquently describes the pain of sudden and unplanned separation from family and friends for an unknown period of time:</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Une des conséquences les plus remarquables de la fermeture des portes fut, en effet, la soudaine séparation où furent placés des êtres qui n’y étaient pas préparés. Des mères et des enfants, des époux, des amants qui avaient cru procéder quelques jours auparavant à une séparation temporaire, qui s’étaient embrassés sur le quai de notre gare avec deux ou trois recommandations, certains de se revoir quelques jours ou quelques semaines plus tard, enfoncés dans la stupide confiance humaine, à peine distraits par ce départ de leurs préoccupations habituelles, se virent d’un seul coup éloignés sans recours, empêchés de se rejoindre ou de communiquer.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>As with our most recent experience, the word &ldquo;solidarity&rdquo; had to be dusted off and, once again, be allowed to take center stage. To protect others and be protected by others, to hold together and defeat the common enemy of the plague, saving as many as possible.</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;On peut dire que cette invasion brutale de la maladie eut pour premier effet d’obliger nos concitoyens à agir comme s’ils n’avaient pas de sentiments individuels.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>Or, even not knowing how long it would last and the ensuing impatience felt by all when an arbitrarily set deadline had been passed. We are witnessing the same in the people as the first wave has been managed by most countries and the people itch for a return to normality. We will see what happens when the inevitable second wave comes.</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;En particulier, tous nos concitoyens se privèrent très vite, même en public, de l’habitude qu’ils avaient pu prendre de supputer la durée de leur séparation. Pourquoi ? C’est que lorsque les plus pessimistes l’avaient fixée par exemple à six mois, lorsqu’ils avaient épuisé d’avance toute l’amertume de ces mois à venir, hissé à grand-peine leur courage au niveau de cette épreuve, tendu leurs dernières forces pour demeurer sans faiblir à la hauteur de cette souffrance étirée sur une si longue suite de jours, alors, parfois, un ami de rencontre, un avis donné par un journal, un soupçon fugitif ou une brusque clairvoyance, leur donnait l’idée qu’après tout, il n’y avait pas de raison pour que la maladie ne durât pas plus de six mois, et peut-être un an, ou plus encore.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>Paired with this feeling, though, was a confidence that the plague is something that happens to others. We all do the same today, hoping against hope that we won&rsquo;t be affected. We hear that 1-2% will die if 70% get it—we hope that we won&rsquo;t die; we hope that, should we get it, it leaves no lasting mark. We hope. We don&rsquo;t reason. We can&rsquo;t all be right.</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Beaucoup cependant espéraient toujours que l’épidémie allait s’arrêter et qu’ils seraient épargnés avec leur famille. En conséquence, ils ne se sentaient encore obligés à rien. La peste n’était pour eux qu’une visiteuse désagréable qui devait partir un jour puisqu’elle était venue.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>The plague takes its victims and ceremonies change: for example, the citizens of Oran were no longer allowed to mourn or attend funerals as before, a restriction we have as well in many places.</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Toutes les formalités avaient été simplifiées et d’une manière générale la pompe funéraire avait été supprimée. Les malades mouraient loin de leur famille et on avait interdit les veillées rituelles, si bien que celui qui était mort dans la soirée passait sa nuit tout seul et celui qui mourait dans la journée était enterré sansdélai.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>What we did not have was the rats at the beginning (signaling the onset of the virus), nor did we have reduced communication, as they did:</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Les communications téléphoniques interurbaines, autorisées au début, provoquèrent de tels encombrements aux cabines publiques et sur les lignes, qu’elles furent totalement suspendues pendant quelques jours, puis sévèrement limitées à ce qu’on appelait les cas urgents, comme la mort, la naissance et le mariage.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>What we do have is conspiracy theories and outright denial that the plague is happening—something the Oranans didn&rsquo;t have the luxury of indulging, as their plague was considerably more aggressive and deadly and, thus, could not be wished away. The plague attacked the &ldquo;bubons&rdquo; or lymph nodes, not the lungs, and was perhaps thus more disgusting, as in this description of Rieux&rsquo;s work on a patient:</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Deux coups de bistouri en croix et les ganglions déversaient une purée mêlée de sang. Les malades saignaient, écartelés. Mais des taches apparaissaient au ventre et aux jambes, un ganglion cessait de suppurer, puis se regonflait. La plupart du temps, le malade mourait, dans une odeur épouvantable.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>Still, they gathered information wherever they could, trying to put together as positive a picture as their reason allowed.</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;On pouvait voir, par exemple, les plus intelligents d’entre eux faire mine de chercher comme tout le monde dans les journaux, ou bien dans les émissions radiophoniques, des raisons de croire à une fin rapide de la peste, et concevoir apparemment des espoirs chimériques, ou éprouver des craintes sans fondement, à la lecture de considérations qu’un journaliste avait écrites un peu au hasard, en bâillant d’ennui.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><ol></ol><p>Though the plague moves slowly, at least it moves over time, showing some evidence of its passage. Can you imagine the denialism and conspiracy theories that would accompany something like an asteroid strike detected two years prior to impact? Mankind would be utterly and ideologically unable to prepare for something like that and would, despite an ostensibly higher intelligence, go the way of the dinosaurs before them.</p>
<p>They had speculation as well, driving prices into the stratosphere, as well as a clear divide between how the rich and poor would fare in the crisis.</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;La spéculation s’en était mêlée et on offrait à des prix fabuleux des denrées de première nécessité qui manquaient sur le marché ordinaire. Les familles pauvres se trouvaient ainsi dans une situation très pénible, tandis que les familles riches ne manquaient à peu près de rien.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>There is much to admire in the prose, with many beautifully written sections. E.g. <span class="quote-inline">&ldquo;La nuit, les grands cris des bateaux invisibles, la rumeur qui montait de la mer et de la foule qui s’écoulait […]&rdquo;</span>—describing the feeling of the city at night, by the shore—or the much longer, and also lovingly rendered description of the city at night, under a full moon,</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Sous les ciels de lune, elle alignait ses murs blanchâtres et ses rues rectilignes, jamais tachées par la masse noire d’un arbre, jamais troublées par le pas d’un promeneur ni le cri d’un chien. La grande cité silencieuse n’était plus alors qu’un assemblage de cubes massifs et inertes, entre lesquels les effigies taciturnes de bienfaiteurs oubliés ou d’anciens grands hommes étouffés à jamais dans le bronze s’essayaient seules, avec leurs faux visages de pierre ou de fer, à évoquer une image dégradée de ce qui avait été l’homme. Ces idoles médiocres trônaient sous un ciel épais, dans les carrefours sans vie, brutes insensibles qui figuraient assez bien le règne immobile où nous étions entrés ou du moins son ordre ultime, celui d’une nécropole où la peste, la pierre et la nuit auraient fait taire enfin toute voix.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>The general helplessness comes through—<span class="quote-inline">&ldquo;Ils se croyaient libres et personne ne sera jamais libre tant qu’il y aura des fléaux.&rdquo;</span>—but the essentially existentialist attitude shines through that you <em>do what you can anyway because what else is there?</em> <span class="quote-inline">&ldquo;La bêtise insiste toujours {…}&rdquo;</span> Either you kill yourself or you make the best of it, but being useless is worse than either.</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Peut-être, répondit le docteur, mais vous savez, je me sens plus de solidarité avec les vaincus qu’avec les saints. Je n’ai pas de goût, je crois, pour l’héroïsme et la sainteté. Ce qui m’intéresse, c’est d’être un homme.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Il ne fallait pas écouter ces moralistes qui disaient qu’il fallait se mettre à genoux et tout abandonner. Il fallait seulement commencer de marcher en avant, dans la ténèbre, un peu à l’aveuglette, et essayer de faire du bien.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>I&rsquo;ve included <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3986">notes, citations and errata</a> in a separate post.</p>
</div></dd>
<dt class="field"><span id="Breathe">I Can&rsquo;t Breathe (2017)</span></dt>
<dd><div class=" "><p>by <em>Matt Taibbi</em></p>
<p>This book is an absolute tour-de-force of research and writing and empathy. The main thread of the story is the life and death of Eric Garner. He was born, lived, and died at an early age (43) in Staten Island, New York, in the U.S. He was killed by police for standing on a sidewalk. The story is much more complicated than that and Taibbi takes time to show all of the detail of how Garner ended up working on that corner, why he hadn&rsquo;t done anything wrong that day, and, perhaps most importantly, what brought the police to that location and put them in a killing mood.</p>
<p>The story is long and involves many features unique to the American landscape. Garner was basically doomed from day one, doomed from birth just by who his parents were and where they lived. He was doomed by his skin color and his imposing size. He was doomed by a society that inordinately feared people that looked like him—and dumped its frustrations on people like him. He was doomed by a society that could find no other way to <em>be</em> than to sacrifice 90% of its population to live in comparative squalor while 10% does quite well.</p>
<p>The police are the army that enforces the borders along these two intertwined societies, that makes sure that the extraction of wealth and energy continues, that the subjugated population stays in line. This situation affects people of all races—it happens a lot to poor Whites too—but people of color—and Blacks in particular—are singled out and massively overrepresented in all forms of statistics about crime.</p>
<p>In Taibbi&rsquo;s words,</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;[Garner] was, […] “just a man,” a single flawed person ground up by the power of the state. Eric Garner was murdered by history.</p>
<p>&ldquo;[…] The lengths we went to as a society to crush someone of such modest ambitions—Garner’s big dream was to someday sit down at work—were awesome to contemplate. What happened to Garner spoke to the increasing desperation of white America to avoid having to even see, much less speak to or live alongside, people like him.</p>
<p>&ldquo;[…] The motive was the secret sin of a divided society, a country frozen in time for more than fifty years, stopped one crucial step short of reconciliation and determined to stay there.&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote><p>That this is the case is a self-fulfilling prophecy: where the police look for crime, they find it. There are more than enough laws for them to always find something. The books have been filled with &ldquo;reasons&rdquo;; their job is to match those reasons to people in ways that aren&rsquo;t too obviously ridiculous. Even ridiculous generally goes unnoticed, except by the victims, whose opinions don&rsquo;t matter. If &ldquo;impeding government business&rdquo; by standing on a sidewalk is not only a ticketable offense, but an arrestable one, then all bets are off.</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Even in Tompkinsville Park, where 98 percent of everyone you met had less than a dollar or two, the police were everywhere.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>And the police go hunting nearly exclusively in Black and Latino neighborhoods in places like New York City. They &ldquo;toss&rdquo; people regularly for doing absolutely nothing—more than half a million stops per year, all to feed the Compstat numbers machine that determines who gets a promotion and who doesn&rsquo;t. But the police didn&rsquo;t invent the machine—they&rsquo;re kind of part of it, too. The upper-class people who matter, who run everything, set things up to keep the money and power funnels pouring in their direction.</p>
<p>As an officer Polanco describes it,</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;In one incident, he was forced to cuff a thirteen-year-old Mexican boy, with his superiors telling him they’d figure out the charge later. He even recounted being ordered to summons a guy for having no dog license when Polanco couldn’t even see a dog.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>What does &ldquo;toss&rdquo; mean? Often enough, it means a strip search in public, in the middle of the street, with a free genital and rectal exam conducted by apparently all-too-willing police officers.</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;They had a term for it: “socially raping.” Sometimes they’d yank a guy’s pants down in the precinct, but other times they’d do it in the open air, right on the sidewalk.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>&ldquo;But, wait?&rdquo;, you might ask. What about the Constitution? Don&rsquo;t people have rights? What about, specifically, the Fourth Amendment? Those things are not for the poor, not since the Supreme Court approved so-called Terry Stops, which reduced the requirement for a search to a constitutionally laughable level.</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The Terry decision essentially said that the legal standard for a whole generation of field searches would henceforth rest in the minds of police officers.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>At the time, people were 100% aware—in no small part due to the Kerner Commission of 1968—that racism and police brutality were the problems underlying inequality and subsequent &ldquo;unrest&rdquo;. But the Supreme Court punted on that too, basically saying that <span class="quote-inline">&ldquo;[w]e can’t do anything about racism or police brutality. But we can do something about crime.&rdquo;</span> And what was crime? Oh, we knew it when we saw it. And we knew where to look for it.</p>
<p>With this cudgel in hand, they went to work.</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;What they did have, they thought, was a tool that would help reduce crime. They weren’t sure if it would be abused or not. But they were pretty sure it would work.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>By “work”, they meant “keep poor people in check” by keeping them working, too tired to resist, not agitating, not bothering their betters. The policies prevented some crime by combatting it with other crime.</p>
<p>No other supposedly civilized country does this. Well, corporate crime is allowed, but directly preventing potential criminal acts by perpetrating constitutional crimes on the potential perps? I don’t think so. There is, essentially, carte blanche for the police themselves to commit the crimes they were charged with preventing, as long as they stick to prescribed victims.</p>
<p>To be clear they were <em>not</em> interested in stopping crime. The continuing lax attitude and nearly outright encouragement of white-collar crime—the more you steal, the more likely you are to get a Cabinet position—makes that very clear. Nor were they interested in even collaring the poor people responsible for the actual crimes that they&rsquo;d even bothered to put on the books as the ones they claimed to be enforcing.</p>
<p>The crimes that affect the most lives, that are the most violent in terms of destroying lives and entire generations, are actively encouraged as part of the system that makes the right people rich. Taibbi describes the scams run by Eastern Service, a real-estate company that, in 1968, introduced practices that would be emulated several times over the next decades, culminating in the breathtaking destruction of Black wealth in 2008, when the financial crisis wiped out 70% of Black wealth.</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;Federal prosecutors estimated that in 1968 alone, companies like the Eastern Service operation created $100 million in defaults and more than five thousand empty houses in New York City alone.</p>
<p>&ldquo;[…] There was no direct bribery element in 2008, but everything else was more or less exactly the same: wholesale falsification of financial records, the aggressive effort to get people with poor credit histories into homes, falsified employment data, inflated appraisals, etc.</p>
<p>&ldquo;[…] From forty acres and a mule to the Great Society to subprime, it was the same swindle, over and over and over again: promises that turned into brutal obligations that turned into life-ruining debt and neighborhood-destroying foreclosures for some and massive windfall profits for others.&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote><p>This is where the racism is undeniable—unless you have a vested interest in denying it. I.e. you&rsquo;re already in the 10% or you think that you are or you dream one day of being in it or you&rsquo;re just a deluded suck-up to authority.</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;This disparity echoed an earlier bizarre statistic showing that 90 to 95 percent of all people imprisoned for drug offenses in New York in the nineties were black and Hispanic, despite studies showing that 72 percent of all illegal drug users in the city were white. Clearly a certain form of discretion was being exercised.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>The result of all of these penny-ante arrests was to not only get the individual police the numbers they needed to advance their careers, but also to ruin the rest of those people&rsquo;s lives. Once you&rsquo;ve got an arrest record, the supposed largess of society is no longer available. And guess whose fault that is? Why it&rsquo;s your very own fault, isn&rsquo;t it?</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;And thanks to the drug war, huge numbers of young men came home from prison sentences unable to vote, live in public housing, or obtain licenses to be barbers, pet shop owners, even sanitation workers. They were kept under constant surveillance, watched even when they urinated for parole officers.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>So the objective wasn&rsquo;t to catch criminals. It was to produce criminals out of the parts of the population considered to be unsavory by their betters. <span class="quote-inline">&ldquo;The objective was order, an inherently ambiguous term but a condition that people in a given community recognized when they saw it.&rdquo;</span></p>
<p>Translation? No poor or black people in sight were to sully the view of anyone important (generally, the top 10%). It&rsquo;s why Eric Garner was no longer allowed to stand on his sordid, sad corner in that sordid, sad park in sordid, sad Staten Island and sell cigarettes for $0.50 apiece. Across the street, important people had paid money to build an apartment complex for other important people. And no-one wanted to see a shambolic black man every day. He had to go.</p>
<p>Even when New York City settled a civil lawsuit about Stop and Frisk, they just kept doing it, exploiting a gaping loophole in the settlement language to simply <em>prohibit</em> and then <em>report</em> on the now-drastically increased harassment instead of stopping it.</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;That they didn’t stop mass violating the constitutional rights of 50 percent of the city’s population was, sadly enough, immaterial. The city hadn’t actually promised to change, as far as Judge Scheindlin saw it. They’d merely promised to write a new policy prohibiting the wrong behavior and turn over some numbers.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>Taibbi cites case after case to bolster his point, even finding a case from the 70s in Arkansas when Bill Clinton was DA where police officers stopped a black family for a bullshit ticket, fined them $25, then didn&rsquo;t trust them to pay it if billed. So they forced the family to drive to the precinct where they had to pay in cash, immediately. The father had the gall to ask for a receipt and the ticketing officer rewarded him by shooting him point-blank in the face in the middle of the precinct. That case didn&rsquo;t make it past the grand jury.</p>
<p>Neither did Eric Garner&rsquo;s case, even though there were eight minutes of video showing police officers attacking a man out of the blue, a man who didn&rsquo;t defend himself, pulling him to the ground and killing him with an illegal chokehold. Most of the eight-minute video is of Garner lying prone on the street while officers mill around, joking amongst themselves before someone thinks to call an ambulance. Garner&rsquo;s last words were &ldquo;I can&rsquo;t breathe.&rdquo;</p>
<p>Even in cases like Garner&rsquo;s, where there is video, the top 10% are more than happy to accept that the video isn&rsquo;t <em>real</em> evidence because a <em>known criminal</em> made it on his dirty, criminal phone. They don&rsquo;t claim that it&rsquo;s faked, only that it doesn&rsquo;t matter because the wrong kind of person made it. </p>
<p>By that logic, though, if two cops filmed each other committing a crime, then their subsequent criminal culpability would automatically disqualify the video they each took, exonerating each of them. Two videos of crimes. No criminals. A paradox because the criminal act disqualifies the filmer as a witness forever. It makes no sense, but it doesn&rsquo;t have to in order to be effective. People generally don&rsquo;t care about holes in logic big enough to drive a truck through if you&rsquo;re telling them what they want to hear.</p>
<p>Those are just some of the details in this book. Taibbi goes deep into the numbers machine as well as the incestuous relationship between politicians and the police. He details the Orwellian laws for police that are completely different than those for mere mortals. He describes the labyrinth of the disciplinary process for police, what a black hole it is, from which no accusation can possible escape. As he puts it, the review board <span class="quote-inline">&ldquo;is where citizen complaints go to die.&rdquo;</span></p>
<p>He discusses the common police practice of planting evidence, of lying on arrest reports, of lying on the witness stand, of brutality and humiliation, of &ldquo;teaching lessons&rdquo; to &ldquo;those animals&rdquo;. The police are at war with the poor, plain and simple. They have been given this job by the rich. Black are massively disproportionately harmed and beaten down by this system.</p>
<p>Though the statistics would support it, Taibbi does not even bother to explain that white people are kept down by the man, too. He does not bother to discuss that, in absolute numbers, more white people are killed by police than black people. This is all true, but there is no way to focus on any of this once you realize the disgusting, shocking level of racism in the ruling class and its private army, the police.</p>
<p>Taibbi makes the case what so many who&rsquo;ve been involved in the fight for justice for many years have known for decades: there is a deep animus against Blacks that drives people absolutely crazy. It makes them fly off the handle in ways that they absolutely do not do when dealing with &ldquo;their own kind&rdquo;.</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Try to imagine a world where there isn’t a vast unspoken consensus that black men are inherently scary, and most of these police assaults would play in the media like spontaneous attacks of madness. Instead, they’re sold as battle scenes from an occupation story, where a quick trigger finger while patrolling the planet of a violent alien race is easy to understand.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>It&rsquo;s absolutely clear that many people still just <em>hate</em> Blacks for being black and want nothing to do with them, other than to perhaps continue to benefit from them as a source of cheap labor. Which they do very successfully, with the massive so-called justice system set up to funnel them into jail or prison—they have to have an arrest record—after which you can deny them public housing, jobs, anything. Then you can bleed them for their cheap or free labor while in jail—or while working a bullshit job that their employer knows they can&rsquo;t quit.</p>
<p>The stories Taibbi tells about Garner in this regard are infuriating, with the system and the police just bleeding him dry. Killing him slowly. Torturing him. The police use him for arrest numbers, for their own careers, because they sure as fuck don’t care about cigarette taxes. They often confiscated his money using &ldquo;asset foreiture&rdquo;—another concept unique to America where police can just take your stuff pretty much whenever it strikes their fancy (and good luck getting it back).</p>
<p>It&rsquo;s a tremendous waste of time, money, and it&rsquo;s utterly immoral, to boot. It costs the city nothing to make the charge and it ties up the poor bastard charged for years. Then it churns its way through the conveyor belt of the courts, which rarely drop cases, regardless of how outrageously unsubstantiated they are.</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;It was a textbook case of what police and lawyers both call “test-a-lying.” A police officer will come into court at a probable cause hearing, for instance, and a judge will ask him why he pulled over so-and-so’s car. The officer will respond in a deadpan: “I saw drugs lying on the center console of his vehicle.” Defense lawyers laugh about the omnipresent “center console” detail in arrest warrants.</p>
<p>&ldquo;The drugs in reality will turn out to have been found in a jacket pocket, or under the seat, after an illegal fishing expedition. But the police will tell it in court another way. Particularly in misdemeanors and drug cases, cases without profile, judges routinely buy these dubious bits of testimony and let dirty cases move through the system.</p>
<p>&ldquo;[…] Judges rarely throw out police testimony, and even when they do, actual charges of perjury against a police officer are rare.&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote><p>But police cases are different. Those are slowed down, dragged out over years.</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;From the first knock on the door, family members find themselves facing a series of intractable bureaucracies designed to make cases against police officers vanish in blizzards of political excuses and unintelligible legalese.</p>
<p>&ldquo;[…] These bureaucracies are designed to frustrate and exhaust families bent on getting justice, grinding them down over time until finally they become dispirited and give up. The quest for answers becomes a war of attrition, and the state almost always wins.</p>
<p>&ldquo;&rdquo;</p>
<ol></ol><p>&ldquo;</p>
<p>&ldquo;[…] In these cases, obscure exceptions and precedents are constantly unearthed to narrow the field of culpability to a vanishing point.</p>
<p>&ldquo;[…] while the cases often begin as unplanned murders and assaults committed in heat-of-the-moment situations by working-class cops, they end as carefully orchestrated cover-ups committed in cold blood, through the more ethereal, polished, institutional racism of politicians, judges, and attorneys.</p>
<p>&ldquo;[…] Both the city and Pantaleo appealed, however, and the case was tied up in court for another year and a half. By the summer of 2016, both sides were still months away from making oral arguments in the case. Years of pitched legal battle over a single number. Even the release of that much information was too much for the city to bear.&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote><p>This is how they waste taxpayer money defending criminals and flouting justice, funneling all the attacker&rsquo;s energy into an ever-more narrowly defined and ultimately useless endeavor. You want justice for a murder, but you end up losing in court two years later trying to get a single number that probably signifies nothing legally relevant. You end up dying on an insignificant hill that your enemy chose.</p>
<p>It would be a tragedy, but we know at least some good comes of it: it&rsquo;s done in the name of generating careers and economic activity for the already privileged to the detriment of people who aren&rsquo;t really people. Let&rsquo;s face it: they brought it on themselves by not having been born privileged. There is no way out of this—the system has been well-designed to trap more than enough of the wrong kind of people within it. And it&rsquo;s well-designed to make those trapped feel like it&rsquo;s their own fault, to constantly remind them that they are being <em>helped</em>, even when the help is there to maintain their poor position, not to lift them out.</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The Great Society programs that came out of that War on Poverty set into motion a series of unintended consequences. The assistance programs always had a strong bureaucratic and even punitive element. The government created armies of inspectors and social workers who, in the process of administering public assistance, got involved in regulating every aspect of life in poor black neighborhoods.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>This is paternalism. Because you can’t just give someone 500 bucks a month. You have to remind them that they needed it. And, of course, let them know that they’re in charge of remedying the deficiency that led them to needing it, which was always inherent to them and not immanent to the system.</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Black America always saw the continuing schism. But white America has traditionally been free to ignore and be untroubled by it and to believe it had reached the “postracial” stage of its otherwise proud history […] in the end mostly what people in power wanted to do was nothing at all, unless there was an immediate benefit in it for them.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>I&rsquo;ve included <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=4015">notes, citations and errata</a> in a separate post.</p>
</div></dd>
<dt class="field"><span id="Living">Living in the Long Emergency (2020)</span></dt>
<dd><div class=" "><p>by <em>James Howard Kunstler</em></p>
<p>This book is a follow-up to Kunstler&rsquo;s 2005 <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3938">The Long Emergency</a>. It starts out with a recap of the thesis from the other book and then fills in with information from the last 15 years. Kunstler takes a critical look at his predictions from 2005, detailing where he got it right and where he went wrong—and why.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;I didn’t call it The Long Emergency for no reason. The operations of complex societies have many interesting features. Two in particular exist in a sort of dynamic tension of opposites: fragility and inertia. Fragility accretes insidiously as ever-greater complexity is layered onto the system. But inertia is the property by which systems in motion tend to remain in motion. A system as large and complex as ours has acquired tremendous momentum, which, of course, feeds back to aggravate its fragility, portending a more destructive eventual outcome.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 1</div></div><p>For example, the shale-oil boom was unforeseeable and kicked the can down the road for a decade—at most. He likens it to <span class="quote-inline">&ldquo;cutting of the top ten inches of your bedsheet and sewing it on the bottom because your feet were cold.&rdquo;</span> Fracking is capital-intensive—read: expensive—and requires heavy loans. Fracked, shale-oil wells have a much steeper expiry curve and are quickly played out.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;As independent oil analyst Arthur Berman put it: “Shale is a retirement party for the oil industry.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 9</div></div><p>Companies that are trying to stay ahead of their creditors have no choice but to dig more and more wells to take advantage of the initial steep &ldquo;play&rdquo;, taking on more and more debt. Kunstler calls it &ldquo;Red Queen Syndrome&rdquo; because they&rsquo;re <span class="quote-inline">&ldquo;running as fast as they can to stay in one place.&rdquo;</span> It&rsquo;s only ZIRP (Zero Interest-rate Policies) that even allow something like this to exist.</p>
<p>The more successful they are—and they have been very successful, driving U.S. oil production to heretofore unknown heights—the lower the oil price as the market gluts. When the price drops, their already-shitty and barely non-laughable business model becomes utterly fantastic and untenable. But they can&rsquo;t stop producing, either.</p>
<p>He also discusses the increasing rise of propaganda for both alternative energy and for electric vehicles. He quickly disposes of the notion that either of these will replace the existing infrastructure in any significant way—not without drastically changing living patterns and levels of consumption.</p>
<p>The solution to the atrocity of suburbia, its attendant necessitating of an automobile for nearly everything, and the large-scale elimination of public transportation is not to replace the entire fleet with electric vehicles or to electrify all of the existing vehicles. There are neither nearly enough time nor resources for any of that. There&rsquo;s also the poor fit—or utter engineering impossibility—of using electric for everything that we use fossil fuels for today. You can&rsquo;t fly on batteries, nor can you ship overland with batter-powered trucks. Trains would work, but the U.S. blew its rail network to kingdom come decades ago.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The likelihood that we will power the USA on “renewable” energy in anything remotely like the current configuration of activities—suburbia, Happy Motoring, air-conditioning for all, cheap food, night baseball, Netflix, Amazon, server farms, commercial aviation, et cetera—is about the same as the chance that Xi Jinping will deliver each and every one of us a dim sum birthday breakfast at home next year.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 28</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The wishful public has been fed a diet of misinformation from a wishful news media that won’t tolerate anything but positive thinking about maintaining our current arrangements because imagining a different outcome is too depressing.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 29</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The thinking displayed in the Drawdown Project’s manifesto ignores a primary reality of our predicament: that increased complexity leads to increased risk of systemic breakdown. It’s as if they can’t imagine a world without a continuing expansion of human activities, as represented in economic growth. That is their only context. All that needs to be done is to “green up” the growth.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 212</div></div><p>In part two, Kunstler takes to the road to visit with and interview some of his most interesting, frequent, or long-term correspondents. He mostly visits farmers and those who have figured out how to be self-sufficient, self-taught, or at least useful in myriad ways. They almost all have the affectation common to the self-taught and somewhat cloistered: they have theories that they&rsquo;ve never had refuted. Mostly, though, they seem like relatively nice (if, at times, woefully undereducated and drastically over-autodidactic) people—Ok, the white-supremacist was far less rational and more suffused with conspiracy lore than the others—who are making their way in decidedly non-mainstream and more traditional and possibly moral ways.</p>
<p>The third and final part looks at some topics that have come much more to the fore in the last fifteen years—and even in the year it took to write the first two parts: extinctions in Nature and environmental impact, financialization and oil and its massive and disastrous impact on savings and investment in the ten years since the 2008 crisis, the autocoprophagy of the American Left (the Right was already hopeless) in recent politics, with the seeming madness engendered by the election of Trump and, more importantly, the loss by Clinton.</p>
<p>This madness evinces itself as a descent into omphaloskepsis on the part of the Left, as they shatter themselves into sects of Twitter-history–scouring hordes of virtue-signalers and purity-testers and know-it-alls who show up to torpedo anyone who was ever useful for ever having been slightly less than perfect in careers that have often spanned decades of struggle and hardship.</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Social media, it turns out, amplifies and accelerates antisocial behavior among a population that was already having a hard enough time processing reality.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>Some of his further speculation is highly speculative and, in my opinion, wrong-headed, but that&rsquo;s to be expected, I suppose. Whereas he&rsquo;s mostly right about Trump, </p>
<ol></ol><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;History is a prankster. You order a Gray Champion, and cosmic room service sends up a casino developer and New York real estate mogul with a laughable hairdo, a big mouth, and no experience running a government.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 232</div></div><p>…his in-built libertarianism mounts for him the same blinkers that many Americans wear, preventing them from seeing any solution but the one put right in front of them. For example, he complains about </p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;[…] and a new confiscatory wealth tax on assets, not the income from assets, but a tax on what you already own.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 238</div></div><p>But many economically successful countries have something like it (including Switzerland). The problem of inequality is probably the biggest one facing the US (and other countries), with its nearly unfettered upward redistribution of wealth. Making that wealth inheritable cements the problem. Address the idea of &ldquo;seizing capital&rdquo;, he writes,</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Even theoretically, the money to pay for those programs doesn’t exist.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 239</div></div><p>It does. Other people have it. Even if future debt doesn&rsquo;t work, we can take back value from those who have stolen it from us and hoarded it. There&rsquo;s a decent chance that, by the time we get done taking it, that it won&rsquo;t be worth anything anymore, but the money is technically <em>available</em>.</p>
<p>While he rightly recognizes that racism isn&rsquo;t the biggest problem—and that historical attempts to address it in the U.S. have failed miserably—he obstinately characterizes these failings in ways that blame the wrong parties. He correctly notes that all races in a certain class are affected by the upward distribution—pointing out that telling people who&rsquo;ve also been left behind that they need to share the tiny piece of pie they have is a non-starter. This is all correct, but somewhat lost in his ham-handed prose (and I&rsquo;m being very generous here because he&rsquo;s otherwise a lucid thinker and writer; some would just dismiss him as a racist outright, which is unfair in the other direction).</p>
<p>Finally, he tells of his own personal journey over the last fifteen years. He divorced, moved out of Saratoga Springs, and bought a property with a house on it in a declining nearby town. He&rsquo;s got a large garden, fruit trees, and some chickens. With about ten hours of work per week, he makes a good part of his own food. He&rsquo;s close enough to town to walk to Main Street. He was quite ill for nearly a decade with cobalt poisoning from a hip replacement in 2003. He seems to have battened down the hatches in his preparations for the ongoing Long Emergency (exacerbated post-publication by COVID-19).</p>
<p>I&rsquo;ve included <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=4028">notes, citations and errata</a> in a separate post.</p>
</div></dd>
<dt class="field"><span id="Westen">Im Westen nichts Neues (1929)</span></dt>
<dd><div class=" "><p>by <em>Erich Maria Remarque</em></p>
<p>This book is written from the point of view of a young German named Paul Bäumer, who fights at the German/French front during WWI. Over the course of the book, the harsh world in which he finds himself hones his cynicism, makes him more jaded.</p>
<p>We meet Paul at the front, having already acclimated there with his colleagues, Albert Kropp, a former schoolmate from his hometown; Haie Westhus, a hulking young man; Friedrich Müller, another classmate of Paul&rsquo;s, more interested in book learning than the others; Stanislaus Katczinsky, an older reservist with a ton of experience and a nearly unmatched penchant for survival; and Tjaden, a young man with a prodigious appetite: Detering, a simple farmer boy; Kantorek, the former schoolmaster and fervent supporter of the war; and, finally, Himmelstoss, the former-postmaster-turned-corporal who tormented them all during basic training.</p>
<p>At the front, they engage in the nearly unutterable filthiness and desolation of trench warfare, moving a few meters back and forth each day. They are all dulled by a lack of rations, but almost more by a lack of sleep.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Katczinsky hat recht: es wäre alles nicht so schlimm mit dem Krieg, wenn man nur mehr Schlaf haben würde. Vorne ist es doch nie etwas damit, und vierzehn Tage jedesmal sind eine lange Zeit.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 20-21</div></div><p>A common theme is that the people at home don&rsquo;t understand at all what it&rsquo;s like at the front. They are too quick to judge those that try to avoid the fight or to flee.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;[…] wußten wir bereits, daß die Todesangst stärker ist. Wir wurden darum keine Meuterer, keine Deserteure, keine Feiglinge – alle diese Ausdrücke waren ihnen ja so leicht zur Hand […]&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 113-116</div></div><p>Confronted with a battlefield filled with the dead, wounded and barely surviving in a roiled sea of mud, blood, and oil, … who can blame them for &ldquo;forgetting&rdquo; what they were fighting for, for &ldquo;forgetting&rdquo; the people at home and their desire for &ldquo;victory&rdquo;?</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Die Gewehre verkrusten, die Uniformen verkrusten, alles ist fließend und aufgelöst, eine triefende, feuchte, ölige Masse Erde, in der die gelben Tümpel mit spiralig roten Blutlachen stehen und Tote, Verwundete und Überlebende langsam versinken.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 2410-2412</div></div><p>For the young, the war becomes all they&rsquo;ve ever known. Their days in school are finished. When—if—they return, they&rsquo;ll have nothing to return to. The older soldiers still have a families and jobs—they have some other routine to which they can yearn to return. The young don&rsquo;t even that that. They become fatalistic without even the years of experience needed to master the philosophy.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Der Krieg hat uns weggeschwemmt. Für die andern, die älteren, ist er eine Unterbrechung, sie können über ihn hinausdenken.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 171-173</div></div><p>They think about what life will be like after, should they survive the war, about having spent two years away from a home that they will no longer recognize as their own.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Kropp denkt ebenfalls darüber nach. »Es wird überhaupt schwer werden mit uns allen. Ob die sich in der Heimat eigentlich nicht manchmal Sorgen machen deswegen? Zwei Jahre Schießen und Handgranaten – das kann man doch nicht ausziehen wie einen Strumpf nachher.«&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 732-734</div></div><p>They know how senseless their survival is, that with being clever and careful they can only improve very long odds. Fortune is the final arbiter.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Jeder Soldat bleibt nur durch tausend Zufälle am Leben. Und jeder Soldat glaubt und vertraut dem Zufall.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 842-842</div></div><p>That&rsquo;s not to say that experience counts for nothing.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Der Stellungskampf von heute erfordert Kenntnisse und Erfahrungen, man muß Verständnis für das Gelände haben, man muß die Geschosse, ihre Geräusche und Wirkungen im Ohr haben, man muß vorausbestimmen können, wo sie einbauen, wie sie streuen und wie man sich schützt. Dieser junge Ersatz weiß natürlich von alledem noch fast gar nichts.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 1104-1106</div></div><p>They spend long nights in wet holes in the ground. They watch fog rise from craters like ghosts. They see fields of uncollected corpses bloating in the heat. They starve, they dehydrate, they freeze. They watch deadly chloroform gas creep over the fields, fingering every crevasse with its tendrils.</p>
<p>From this, they suddenly return to camp and &ldquo;normality&rdquo;, knowing that a return to the madness and misery of the front is inevitable.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Alles ist Gewohnheit, auch der Schützengraben. Diese Gewohnheit ist der Grund dafür, daß wir scheinbar so rasch vergessen. Vorgestern waren wir noch im Feuer, heute machen wir Albernheiten und fechten uns durch die Gegend, morgen gehen wir wieder in den Graben.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 1175-1176</div></div><p>Paul loses the first of his comrades, watching him die in a hospital bed, getting thinner and thinner.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;[…] die Stirn wölbt sich stärker, die Backenknochen stehen vor. Das Skelett arbeitet sich durch. Die Augen versinken schon. In ein paar Stunden wird es vorbei sein.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 245-248</div></div><p>He and his company are assigned to guard duty for a month, guarding emaciated and surly Russian prisoners of war.</p>
<p>They will do nearly anything to eat good food. At one point, Paul and Kat hole up in a shed with a couple of roast chickens in one of the only truly wholesome scenes in the book.</p>
<p>Later, when the company is assigned to guard duty for a small town, they live high on the hog. One day, he and his comrades put together a grand meal, but the smoke from the fire attracts enemies. They continue cooking during the attack, loath to leave their supper behind. <span class="quote-inline">&ldquo;Doch das Pufferbacken wird jetzt schwieriger.&rdquo;</span></p>
<p>The boys take revenge on their former DI Himmelstoss when he is finally assigned to the front—and no longer has any true power over them. They sneak across a river to spend a night with some willing French girls, fraternizing with the &ldquo;enemy&rdquo;.</p>
<p>He describes a horse dying on the battlefield, completely unaware of what has happened to it, scrabbling its way forward in its life blindly—a metaphor for many of the soldiers who fall in a similarly senseless fashion.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Das letzte stemmt [Pferd] sich auf die Vorderbeine und dreht sich im Kreise wie ein Karussell, sitzend dreht es sich auf den hochgestemmten Vorderbeinen im Kreise, wahrscheinlich ist der Rücken zerschmettert. Der Soldat rennt hin und schießt es nieder. Langsam, demütig rutscht es zu Boden.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 538-540</div></div><p>Juxtaposed with the death of the horses is the equally senseless death of a young recruit (der <span class="quote-inline">&ldquo;kleine Rekrut[…] mit der Wunde&rdquo;</span>), who&rsquo;d only just gotten to the front on the same day that he had his entire waist destroyed by shrapnel. He was not going to survive. It was up to the boys to decide whether to prolong his suffering with a fruitless trip to the field hospital, where he would die—or, whether they would put him out his misery themselves. The miserable scene takes place in pouring rain.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Monoton pendeln die Wagen, monoton sind die Rufe, monoton rinnt der Regen. Er rinnt auf unsere Köpfe und auf die Köpfe der Toten vorn, auf den Körper des kleinen Rekruten mit der Wunde, die viel zu groß für seine Hüfte ist, er rinnt auf das Grab Kemmerichs, er rinnt auf unsere Herzen.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 628-630</div></div><p>On leave, he returns to his mother and his sister, who hesitantly ask him how it is, in the war. He lies, of course. How can he begin to explain to them what it&rsquo;s really like? Their worlds have drifted apart, likely irreparably.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Mutter, was soll ich dir darauf antworten! Du wirst es nicht verstehen und nie begreifen. Du sollst es auch nie begreifen. War es schlimm, fragst du. – Du, Mutter. – Ich schüttele den Kopf und sage:»Nein, Mutter, nicht so sehr. Wir sind ja mit vielen zusammen, da ist es nicht so schlimm.«&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 1376-1378</div></div><p>In his hometown for a few days, he already has PTSD. He hears the whistling of grenades in the squeal of tram wheels.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;[…] das Quietschen der Straßenbahnen sich wie heranheulende Granaten anhört […]&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 1416-1418</div></div><p>As with so many other soldiers of other wars in the century since this book was written, he regrets having come &ldquo;home&rdquo;. It is a reminder of how he no longer fits in anything resembling normalcy. It makes him bitter for what he has lost, but also bitter at those who stayed behind, benefitting, however indirectly, from the unseen and largely unacknowledged sacrifices at the front.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Ich hätte nie hierherkommen dürfen. […] Ich hätte nie auf Urlaub fahren dürfen.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 1586-1588</div></div><p>Back at war and Paul considers how he and his comrades have come to be trapped here: by the whims of higher-ups who make decisions nearly wholly unaware of what is happening in the real world. Orders are orders and they all follow them. Those that follow them don&rsquo;t understand why they were given; those that gave them don&rsquo;t understand what they mean to those who follow them.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;An irgendeinem Tisch wird ein Schriftstück von einigen Leuten unterzeichnet, die keiner von uns kennt, und jahrelang ist unser höchstes Ziel das, worauf sonst die Verachtung der Welt und ihre höchste Strafe ruht.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 1644-1646</div></div><p>Perhaps because they don&rsquo;t care, but also, possibly, because they are incapable of bridging the divide. They are too far away, the situation too abstract for them to understand the ramifications. This does not excuse them; it explains how they can live with themselves. They are simply unaware of what they are doing, like a man stepping on ants. Their remove insulates them. Our goal should be to avoid making such callous decisions.</p>
<p>Back at the front, Paul gets turned around on a mission and spends a day and night in a foxhole alone, save for the corpse of a Frenchman he&rsquo;d killed. The man had jumped blindly into the same foxhole to escape the same gas that kills Frenchman and German alike.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Jetzt sehe ich erst, daß du ein Mensch bist wie ich. Ich habe gedacht an deine Handgranaten, an dein Bajonett und deine Waffen – jetzt sehe ich deine Frau und dein Gesicht und das Gemeinsame. Vergib mir, Kamerad! Wir sehen es immerzu spät. Warum sagt man uns nicht immer wieder, daß ihr ebenso arme Hunde seid wie wir […]&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 1893-1900</div></div><p>When they escape the front, the troops ride on top of a wagon loaded with goods—<span class="quote-inline">&ldquo;[z]wischen uns steht ein Papageienkäfig, den wir für die Katze gefunden haben&rdquo;</span>—but there isn&rsquo;t room for everyone. There are countless internally displaced persons—families who&rsquo;ve lost their homes and everything but their lives—and they walk in the mud, with lowered eyes and, more often than not, nothing more than the clothes on their backs.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Ihre Gestalten sind gebeugt, ihre Gesichter voll Kummer, Verzweiflung, Hast und Ergebenheit. Die Kinder hängen an den Händen der Mütter, manchmal führt auch ein älteres Mädchen die Kleinen, die vorwärts taumeln und immer wieder zurücksehen. Einige tragen armselige Puppen mit sich. Alle schweigen, als sie an uns vorübergehen.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 2027-2029</div></div><p>Those that remain of the company end up in a hospital, far from the front, nursing their egregious but not hopeless wounds. The hospital has many, many patients, nearly all in worse shape than Paul. He lists them all, finishing with his usual sardonic flair.</p>
<ol></ol><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Im Stockwerk tiefer liegen Bauch- und Rückenmarkschüsse, Kopfschüsse und beiderseitig Amputierte. Rechts im Flügel Kieferschüsse, Gaskranke, Nasen-, Ohren- und Halsschüsse. Links im Flügel Blinde und Lungenschüsse, Beckenschüsse, Gelenkschüsse, Nierenschüsse, Hodenschüsse, Magenschüsse. <strong>Man sieht hier erst, wo ein Mensch überall getroffen werden kann.</strong>&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 2217-2219</div></div><p>The war is not done with him, though. He heals. He returns to the front, but the German effort is unraveling, no longer even capable of pretending to support its cannon fodder. The English and American troops seem overwhelming, better armed, better fed. At this point, Paul is fully jaded, knowing that the factory owners back at home are growing fat on profit while the soldiers at the front tighten their belts over bellies empty of everything but a thin flour soup.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Wir aber sind mager und ausgehungert. Unser Essen ist so schlecht und mit so viel Ersatzmitteln gestreckt, daß wir krank davon werden. Die Fabrikbesitzer in Deutschland sind reiche Leute geworden – uns zerschrinnt die Ruhr die Därme. […]&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 2354-2358</div></div><p>And still Germany manages to find more bodies to send to the front. The hardened troops look with nonjudgmental and even gaze upon the fresh troops that arrive, inexperienced and untrained, they only know how to die. There are thousands of these, in ill-fitting uniforms—none were designed for such small frames—and hollow-eyed from a hunger that has reached from the front deep into Germany itself.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;»Deutschland muß bald leer sein«, sagt Kat.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 2361-2362</div></div><p>This was to be Kat&rsquo;s final joke. He soon died of a grievous head wound, despite Paul&rsquo;s heroic fireman&rsquo;s carry across a live battlefield. He&rsquo;d thought Kat had only a shattered shin, having overlooked the pinhole in his skull that ended him.</p>
<p>The title of the book comes from a report issued on the day the war finally took Paul. The author notes with cruel irony that on this day, </p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;[…] der Heeresbericht sich nur auf den Satz beschränkt[…], im Westen sei nichts Neues zu melden.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 2473-2474</div></div><p>I&rsquo;ve included <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=4031">notes, citations and errata</a> in a separate post.</p>
</div></dd>
<dt class="field"><span id="Bullets">Bullets Points and Punch Lines (2020)</span></dt>
<dd><div class=" "><p>by <em>Lee Camp</em></p>
<p>This is a collection of essays by American political activist, comedian, writer, podcaster, and TV-show host Lee Camp. The foreword is written by no less an eminence than Chris Hedges himself, who is a fan of Camp&rsquo;s work. The introduction is by Jimmy Dore, another comedian who&rsquo;s hosted Hedges on his show several times. They are all good people on the right side of history, with good principles, good research, and strong writing skills.</p>
<p>I&rsquo;ve followed Hedges assiduously for years and recently been quite impressed with Jimmy Dore&rsquo;s YouTube channel. Hedges is scathing in his condemnation of the American political landscape, as is Dore. As is Camp.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;And, as Camp points out, the Democratic Party is as complicit in this debacle as the Republican Party. There is no way at this level to separate Trump from Obama. One may be vulgar and brash, but the other uses urbane polish to accomplish the same ends.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 10 by <cite>Chris Hedges</cite></div></div><p>I&rsquo;ve been a fan of Lee Camp&rsquo;s work for a long time—at least a decade, if not more. I started following and supporting him a long time ago, when he just had his original <em>Moment of Clarity</em> podcast (which he still does, but now on YouTube). I even took a long weekend in Berlin once to catch a rare European show. He&rsquo;s had his own TV show called <em>Redacted Tonight</em> for several years now, in which he regularly delivers hard-hitting and well-crafted news and polemics.</p>
<p>He started out as a stand-up comedian and still does that. But he&rsquo;s very much grown beyond that—becoming a well-spoken and often sardonic and hilarious voice for the downtrodden and for justice.</p>
<p>This is a book of essays that he&rsquo;s published over the years. As you progress through the essays, you can follow along as he finds his voice. The first few essays are on interesting topics, but are a bit heavy on jokes and somewhat forced analogies. They&rsquo;re not <em>bad</em> but they&rsquo;re not nearly as good as those in the second half of the book. The book illustrates Camp&rsquo;s writing style as it progresses from stand-up-comedy-like lines to truly insightful and cutting satire more akin to that of Matt Taibbi.</p>
<p>As the book is a collection of essays, the rest of my review simply chains together citations to give an impression of the scope.</p>
<p>Camp&rsquo;s final word on Donald Trump&rsquo;s place in the pantheon of U.S.-inspired misery is a good place to start. Trump is unexceptional, a symptom rather than the cause.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;I don’t believe Trump is the cause of our country’s main problems. I believe he is a symptom of an incredibly corrupt corporate-ruled system. He is a horrible and rather—not bright—man, but he is not the cause of the millions of hungry and homeless and imprisoned in our country. He is not the cause of the flaws in our democracy and our media. He is just the pimple that has risen up.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 223</div></div><h3>The U.S. Military &amp; Foreign Policy</h3><p>Camp&rsquo;s first essays deal with the astronomical military budget, which continues to grow unchecked, to the detriment of all other societal need.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;[…] a country that can vomit trillions of dollars down a black hole marked “military” can’t find the money to take care of our poor elderly.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 17</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The Pentagon’s accounting fraud diverts many billions of dollars that could be devoted to other national needs: health care, education, job creation, climate action, infrastructure modernization, and more. Indeed, the Pentagon’s accounting fraud amounts to theft on a grand scale—theft not only from America’s taxpayers, but also from the nation’s well-being and its future.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 33</div></div><p>It would be bad enough were the money misappropriated by people who honestly thought it was better put to use in the military. Their duplicity in appropriation and distribution makes it very clear that they are just using the military as a politically unassailable vehicle to which to attach their own ambitions—for graft, money, and power.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Have no fear, patriotic Americans, this is not “lying to the American people, stealing their money, and using it for war,” this is just “unsubstantiated change actions.” Try that on your next tax return. Put in 10 thousand dollars marked “unsubstantiated change actions.” I’m sure they’ll love that.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 58</div></div><p>Other essays discuss what the military actually <em>does</em>, which is enforce capitalism throughout its empire, beating down all resistance. The biggest crime a country could be guilty of, in the eyes of the U.S.?</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Being socialist. Pretty self-explanatory. If you don’t have the same economic system as we do, we treat it like you have candy, and we’re not allowed to have any, so we slip razor blades in yours and tell everyone your candy kills people.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 61</div></div><p>As I&rsquo;ve noted, Camp has quite a way with words. His descriptions of U.S. foreign policy are succinct, darkly funny, accurate, and complete.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The absolute last thing [Venezuelans] need is to be turned into a neocon/neoliberal parking lot in which America rips all their resources out from under them while calling it “freedom.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 68</div></div><h3>Animal Rights &amp; The Environment </h3><p>From there, he moves on to animal rights and the imperative of vegetarianism, both for moral and environmental reasons.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;We have food. We have year-round ripe mangos that don’t even make natural sense. There’s no need to keep 280 million hens and 68 million pigs in a fucking Saw movie.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 87</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;[The mainstream media&rsquo;s job is to] make you think we live in a system that can recover from this carnage without large-scale changes, without a new economic paradigm that doesn’t reward waste and planned obsolescence and profiting off the lives of others.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 96</div></div><p>It&rsquo;s hard to know where to begin with saving the environment. Nearly everything we do right now is going in the wrong direction—and nearly everyone else we know actively benefits from this system—in the short term. In the long term, we&rsquo;re all dead. It&rsquo;s what our lives look like in the medium-term is where it gets interesting. We&rsquo;re mortgaging our future six ways to Sunday, burning the candle not only at both ends, but in the middle in a couple of spots too. Those in power benefit; many others get short-term benefits, enough of them that it becomes nearly impossible to turn this boat around. Maybe we just can&rsquo;t.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;Maybe we’re right to die off. Maybe our hubris and egos the size of SUVs have doomed us, and we should just give up and enjoy our final few years. But if that’s the case, I would like an announcement. I would honestly prefer a national address by some of our so-called leaders stating clearly,</p>
<p>&ldquo;“Look, folks, to continue civilized society of the human species, we would need to change everything. <strong>Every single one of us would have to labor toward a massive shift to a sustainable culture that works in harmony with nature rather than abusing nature</strong> like it’s a servant who gave us an ugly look. We would have to focus on achieving this new society rather than spending a third of our free time watching superhero movies. <strong>But we have no intention of doing that because it sounds kinda hard, not to mention that corporate profits would suffer in the short term.</strong> So instead, we’re declaring here and now that we’ll all just keep functioning as is until such time as the oceans turn to acid, the ever-growing storms consume us, and California feels like the inside of a kiln. According to our best minds, that will be 10 to 20 years from now, so don’t worry about starting that retirement fund. Don’t buy the extended warranty on that vacuum. And whatever you do, at no point and under no circumstances should you quit smoking and drinking…. Thank you, and good night.”&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 100</div></div><h3>Racism &amp; The Police State</h3><p>Camp gets the right argument about police violence. We get distracted because there are way <em>more</em> violent things, so it&rsquo;s easier to point out all of the things that are more dangerous than the police. Deaths caused by police are just the tip of the iceberg of oppression, though. False arrests, cash bail, harassment, and so on, all impact lives to arguably a greater degree.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Yes, it is true that cops kill a lot of white people. They kill more white people than Wendy’s trademarked Baconator sandwich. However, cops kill more people of color than the population percentages would dictate, and they’re more likely to kill people of color who aren’t armed. So while whites do lose their lives in our current police state at a ridiculous rate, they are far more likely to be waving around a gun when it happens.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 164</div></div><p>He also gets it right when he points out that racism <em>exacerbates</em> the underlying anti-poverty stance and inequality. It&rsquo;s a class issue. The police end up working for their real masters no matter where they start out on the ideological scale.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;In this particular instance, systemic racism does not originate in race but in <strong>the way the rich have crafted our laws and our systems to favor the rich.</strong> So it’s a class issue rather than a race issue. Unfortunately, other factors of systemic racism—such as hiring practices and who gets promoted—ensure that white people are more likely to be extremely wealthy and less likely to be extremely poor. Therefore, our country has a racial wealth gap the size of the Grand Canyon&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 182</div></div><p>When you&rsquo;re rich, you make the rules that keep you rich and safe. All of those other animals haven&rsquo;t earned the right to be treated fairly the way rich people have.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;All told, much of our systemic racism problem comes down to class and wealth, not just race. But race, class, and wealth are deeply, inexorably linked. And therefore, whether you choose to ignore it or not, we must acknowledge that systemic racism is a thing. It’s in our schools, our air, our water, and even our televisions. It impacts every area of our lives, and much like climate change, we need to start fixing it rather than acting like it doesn’t exist.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 184</div></div><h3>The Economy &amp; Inequality</h3><p>The stock market is essentially gambling and the house always wins. If you&rsquo;re winning, it&rsquo;s because you&rsquo;re squeezing a profit out of some idiot who probably could afford to lose that money a lot less than you needed to win it.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;I would actually respect the whole system if right on the front of the stock exchange it said, </p>
<p>&ldquo;“Put your money into the stock market! The only way you’ll make more money is if you find a dolt to buy whatever stocks you just bought. But there are an infinite number of dolts! <strong>This gravy train is powered by morons. So you have nothing to worry about.</strong>”&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 104</div></div><p>The market is rigged and the only way to really win is to be the house, as with any other gambling establishment.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Step two is to realize that the market economy in general is designed to exploit billions of us while a tiny number get ridiculously rich. It doesn’t care about the health or sustainability of our society as it facilitates the extraction of all the wealth and resources by sociopaths. Just ask Jeff Bezos—<strong>he’s now worth 150 billion padoodles of Amazon stock, while his workers are on food stamps.</strong>&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 107</div></div><p>For example, the pharmaceutical industry has incentive <em>not</em> to cure diseases with simple and cheap one-time vaccines if they already have a lucrative business selling treatments for the same disease. If we leave everything up to the market, these businesses will logically decide that it&rsquo;s more profitable to sell suffering patients decades worth of drugs instead. We only listen to the opinion of these businesses and have been trained to think that the government, that society—with its vast resources and wealth—has no say.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;They aren’t even trying to cure infectious diseases that make them piles of cash. Instead, the moneyed interests are complaining to their clients that they need to avoid curing these diseases. Because not only do they lose money on the patient who no longer needs meds, <strong>they also lose money because that patient won’t pass the disease onto others.</strong>&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 111</div></div><p>Market incentives are completely screwed up. The market provides those things that people who already have money think will make them the most amount of more money. We don&rsquo;t need to go all the way to a planned economy, but this is nearly the furthest thing from it. We just keep throwing money at rich people and hope that something useful for society comes out of it. It rarely does. It&rsquo;s only with concerted <em>planning</em> and <em>regulation</em> and <em>oversight</em> that we can actually get what <em>we</em> want. That gets in the way of them getting what <em>they</em> want.</p>
<p>We run the whole economy of the world just as poorly as we run any other project. And, just like those poorly run projects, we have terrible oversight and nearly no useful telemetry, using metrics chosen by those already benefitting from a crooked system and pretending that it describes our society&rsquo;s health in any way realistic to all but the 1%. We measure economic health with the stock market; we compare countries only by GDP.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;How do we rate success? We look at gross domestic product—how much we’re producing. GDP doesn’t measure how many kids are drinking toxic water or breathing toxic air. It doesn’t measure how many dolphins are choking on plastic beer rings. It only measures how many beers you chug down. It doesn’t measure how many trees were planted. It measures how many trees we cut down to make the cardboard for coffee cups and condom boxes. It doesn’t rate how screwed the environment is, just how much stuff we buy to keep screwing. <strong>Buy a dildo? Good for the economy. Throw an old dildo out? Ends up in the ocean, gets stuck in a whale’s blowhole. GDP doesn’t care.</strong>&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 130</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;<strong>GDP doesn’t measure how many animals went extinct. It only measures how many animals we ate or sold.</strong> You could be eating a bald eagle roasted with giraffe bacon wrapped around it. As long as you bought it at the store, it’s good for GDP.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 131</div></div><p>GDP is a poor metric, and so is the stock market. Its macro-economic performance has long since become divorced from the economy most people experience. It&rsquo;s become more obvious than ever in 2020 that the stock market has no macro-economic importance. It matters, of course, to the elite, who are busy stuffing their track-suits full of leaves. [4] </p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The Post acts as if Wall Street’s growth is somehow good for average Americans. It’s not. Trump, Hillary, and the Post are all part of an elite class enjoying the spoils of a fully exploited working class. <strong>Judging the health of our society by looking at stock prices is like judging the health of a dying man by looking at the leeches on his skin.</strong> “Wow, those leeches are very happy. This man is in peak condition!”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 207</div></div><p>The only thing fantastical about the following little parable is that is assumes the existence of aliens. The rest is accurate.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>Imagine the aliens that come down here after we’ve eaten everything, killed everything, and turned it all to dust. Imagine them showing up and going, </p>
<p>“What happened to those little fellows that used to be here?”</p>
<p>“Well, they imagined something called the stock market, where nonliving entities called corporations compete to see which one can exploit the earth the most. It eventually swallowed up the whole biosphere they lived in.”</p>
<p>“Oh, which corporation won?”</p>
<ol></ol><p>“Ironically, the one called Amazon, <strong>which used to be the name of the largest river in the world, until they paved it.</strong>”</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 132</div></div><p>This split society—the eternal &ldquo;haves&rdquo; and &ldquo;have nots&rdquo;—leads to jarring conclusions. One is that, in making a judgment on whether something is bad or good for society, you must always be careful to consider <em>for whom</em>.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;It&rsquo;s like a guy driving a car and only seeing speed, being completely blind to how many people he runs down. He’d get to his destination in record time and say to the townspeople, who all had family members run over by this maniac, “We did it. I got here in record time. We should all celebrate together.” <strong>One percent of America is celebrating. It’s time to do things differently.</strong>&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 133</div></div><p>There is a relatively small group in our society that benefits massively from policies that are detrimental to the overwhelming majority. It&rsquo;s not as cut-and-dried as deciding on the right policy. We have to somehow scam this minority, this elite, into implementing it <em>against their own best interests</em>. Either that, or we seize the reins of power from them. We&rsquo;ve tried the first way for a while; maybe it&rsquo;s time to try the second.</p>
<p><hr></p>
<div class="footnote-reference"><span id="footnote_DRAFTABLE_ENTRY_3888_3_body" class="footnote-number">[3]</span> <p>I refer here to the story in <em>The Restaurant at the End of the Universe</em> about our likely progenitors, the <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_The_Hitchhiker%27s_Guide_to_the_Galaxy_characters#Golgafrinchans">Golgafrinchans</a>, whose ark crash-landed on Earth long ago. They were on Ark Fleet Ship B—housing the most useless elements of society—with A and C to follow. It was clear they weren&rsquo;t going to do so and that the A and C denizens had dreamt up the story in order to get rid of the folks on Ark B.</p>
<p>After crash-landing, they lacked the niceties of society, like currency, so they decided to use leaves as <span class="quote-inline">&ldquo;legal tender&rdquo;</span> [5], making every one of them <span class="quote-inline">&ldquo;immensely rich&rdquo;</span>. They all walked around with track-suits stuffed full of leaves. The subsequent inflation problem led them to <span class="quote-inline">&ldquo;effectively revalue the leaf&rdquo;</span> by <span class="quote-inline">&ldquo;embark[ing] on a massive defoliation campaign, and…er, burn down all the forest.&rdquo;</span></p>
</div><div class="footnote-reference"><span id="footnote_DRAFTABLE_ENTRY_3888_4_body" class="footnote-number">[4]</span> All citations from page 299 of my leather-bound edition of the first four books of the at-that-time-only-slightly-inaccurately-named trilogy. [6]</div><div class="footnote-reference"><span id="footnote_DRAFTABLE_ENTRY_3888_5_body" class="footnote-number">[5]</span> Rather than the <span class="quote-inline">&ldquo;increasingly inaccurately named Hitchhiker&rsquo;s Trilogy&rdquo;</span> that is the epithet of the next book in the series, <em>Mostly Harmless</em>.</div><ol></ol><p><br>
I&rsquo;ve included <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=4037">notes, citations and errata</a> in a separate post.</p>
</div></dd>
<dt class="field"><span id="Speculation"><a href="https://webkit.org/blog/10308/speculation-in-javascriptcore/">Speculation in JavaScriptCore</a> (2020)</span></dt>
<dd><div class=" "><p>by <em>Filip Pizlo</em></p>
<p>I include this article in my list of &ldquo;books&rdquo; because it prints to 137 pages and I spent quite a bit of time reading through it, although I didn&rsquo;t end up with any specific citations from it. It&rsquo;s quite an incredible overview of the amount of work and consideration that a modern dynamic-code execution engine like JavaScript entails. Specifically, the paper describes how to implement speculation.</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Before going into the details of speculation, we’ll provide an overview of speculation and an overview of JavaScriptCore. This will help provide context for the main part of this post, which describes speculation by breaking it down into five parts: bytecode (the common IR), control, profiling, compilation, and OSR (on stack replacement).&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>Essentially, a compiler is composed of several compilers, each of which produces code with more stringent assumptions about types and paths taken through the dynamic code. The trick is to build this code in a way that allows an incorrect assumption to bail back to a less-stringent layer without imposing too great a performance impact on the more-stringent one. The paper describes how the different layers gather profiling information that higher layers use to make educated &ldquo;guesses&rdquo; about the level of stringency they can apply.</p>
<p>The performance of the engine is determined less by individual optimizations—to which all compilers have access through common code-generation back-ends like LLVM—and more by the heuristics of how to gather and use profiling information. For example, should an optimized version of a code even be produced? How often does it actually run? With how many different parameters? How many types of parameters? How long does the code take to run at less-optimized levels? How many times has the engine compiled more-optimized code and had to drop back to a less-optimized level? Additionally, the engine must balance the amount of memory and time used to track profiling information. The heuristics must also take into account that more-optimized levels take longer to compile.</p>
<p>The paper goes into a <em>tremendous</em> amount of detail and seems aimed at helping new developers on the project understand what JavaScript Core specifically does. Most of the information is generally applicable to writing dynamic compilers/interpreters/runtimes, though.</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Speculative compilation is all about speeding up dynamically typed programs by placing bets on what types the program would have had if it could have types. Speculation uses OSR exit, which is expensive, so we engineer JavaScriptCore to make speculative bets only if they are a sure thing. Speculation involves using multiple execution tiers, some for profiling, and some to optimize based on that profiling. JavaScriptCore includes four tiers to also get an ideal latency/throughput trade-off on a per-function basis. A control system chooses when to optimize code based on whether it’s hot enough and how many times we’ve tried to optimize it in the past. All of the tiers use a common IR (bytecode in JavaScriptCore’s case) as input and provide independent implementation strategies with different throughput/latency and speculation trade-offs.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div></dd>
<dt class="field"><span id="Last">The Last Man (1826)</span></dt>
<dd><div class=" "><p>by <em>Mary Shelley</em></p>
<p>This feels like another novel from the 19th century that was written serially, for two reasons. In the first place, it feels quite padded out, with each long chapter coming to a mini-plot resolution. In the second place, the book is actually quite clearly two separate volumes, with on of the main heroes of the first book Raymond dying in a conflagration in a plague-filled Constantinople.</p>
<p>The first half is essentially a bullshit fairy tale, ostensibly set in 2092, but with no discernible advancements over the early 19th century, when the book was written. Everything works out without conflict or even much effort on the part of the protagonists. Everyone is happy with all of the results. They&rsquo;re all rich and smart and erudite and powerful and beautiful and just…barf. The second half is the actual pandemic-destroying-all-but-the-last-man book I&rsquo;d set out to read.</p>
<p>But I&rsquo;m getting ahead of myself. The novel begins with the story of Lionel and his sister Perdita, who live in the countryside in Cumberland with their mother in more-or-less abject poverty. They&rsquo;d never met their father, who was a jovial ne&rsquo;er-do-well addicted to gambling who&rsquo;d befriended the king and was, therefor, protected to a good degree.</p>
<p>Shelley sets the tone of the first half of the novel with countless examples of lovely, well-written passages that quickly grow almost tedious to read. For example, the following passage describes Lionel&rsquo;s father as a charming but less-than-sensible man.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;My father was one of those men on whom nature had bestowed to prodigality the envied gifts of wit and imagination, and then left his bark of life to be impelled by these winds, without adding reason as the rudder, or judgment as the pilot for the voyage.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 6</div></div><p>He remains protected, that is, until the king marries, after which the queen drives a wedge between the king and his incorrigible friend. She eventually delivers an ultimatum—cut off the sponge of suffer my wrath. The king obliges and Lionel&rsquo;s father is driven into exile, having no means of support anymore. The king, in turn, gives up the monarchy, ushering in a republic in its place. The queen is beside herself with scorn and anger.</p>
<p>Lionel grows up to be a strapping man, head of a band of scoundrels who ravage the countryside, stealing what they need. The king&rsquo;s other son Adrian moves to Cumberland, butting up against an angry and retributive Lionel, whose heart is reluctantly softened until he flips 180º and expresses lifelong devotion to the man whom he&rsquo;d long considered an arch-enemy. [7]</p>
<p>We are introduced to Raymond, a hero of the Greek-Turkish wars as well as Evadne, a Greek Princess who loves him. Adrian, in turn, loves Evadne. Raymond loves Adrian&rsquo;s sister, Idris. Raymond loves Perdita, and Lionel loves Idris. All clear? These are all respectively strapping or lovely, brilliant, rich people, all in love with one another in a seemingly Gordian knot of unrequited love.</p>
<p>This next citation is just a small snippet of Raymond rambling on for paragraphs about the depth and strength of his love (see more examples from pages 64-77 below).</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Yet you do love me; I feel and know that you do, and thence I draw my most cherished hopes. If pride guided you, or even reason, you might well reject me. Do so; if your high heart, incapable of my infirmity of purpose, refuses to bend to the lowness of mine.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 64</div></div><p>This is effusive and overly flowery prose, depicting yet another improbable love triangle. It reminds me very much of the over-the-top love stories in <em>Atlas Shrugged</em> that described a love flaming so hot as to admit no doubt or compromise or even slight difference of opinion. They are lovely examples of poetic prose but, after a while, it&rsquo;s hard not to feel she would describe taking out the trash in the same manner.</p>
<p>Also indicative of the time but now difficult to connect with is the subservience of woman, not just as forced by society, but also as fervently hoped for by the woman, who <em>chooses</em> a secondary role to a man who deems as having completely earned her worship.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The overflowing warmth of her heart, by making love a plant of deep root and stately growth, had attuned her whole soul to the reception of happiness, when she found in Raymond all that could adorn love and satisfy her imagination.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 125</div></div><p>Lionel moves to Vienna for a while, to work under the tutelage of Freud, while England starts to struggle with its republic. Raymond is agitating to move back to a monarchy, with himself as Lord Protector, which is basically king. Instead of causing issues among his friends, they all think that this is a great idea—because Raymond is so singularly awesome. Much of the rest of the parliament is similarly convinced, especially whenever Raymond opens his brilliant and loquacious mouth.</p>
<p>Soon after, they all become embroiled in the war in Greece. Rumors of Raymond&rsquo;s death are followed by Raymond&rsquo;s actual death and Perdita&rsquo;s subsequent suicide (she obviously had no other reason to live). Adrian and Lionel return home to find that the plague that had begun in Asia and had just started to touch Turkey and Greece has followed them to England.</p>
<p>This is the first part of the book, with only a hint of plague. The second part eloquently describes the plague&rsquo;s relentless eradication of humanity. I read the book to see if it, too, would provide some evidence that humanity&rsquo;s idea of how to handle a plague was no different then than it is now (and than it was in Camus&rsquo;s <em><a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3986">La Peste</a></em>). </p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;We talked of the ravages made last year by pestilence in every quarter of the world; and of the dreadful consequences of a second visitation. We discussed the best means of preventing infection, and of preserving health and activity in a large city thus afflicted—London, for instance.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 214</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Plague might not revive with the summer; but if it did, it should find us prepared. It is a part of man&rsquo;s nature to adapt itself through habit even to pain and sorrow. Pestilence had become a part of our future, our existence; it was to be guarded against, like the flooding of rivers, the encroachments of ocean, or the inclemency of the sky.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 261</div></div><p>This sounds very much like the lessons at least some of us had learned by the end of 2020—although I sometimes seriously question whether we&rsquo;ve lost some capacity for dealing with society-wide issues. Our laser-like focus on individual liberty and luxury leaves little to no room for considering the more foreboding calculus of dependencies and conflicts between unequally represented interests.</p>
<p>Our notion of liberty often devolves into the strong surviving on the backs of the weak (dog eat dog), the strong using their mostly fortuitously acquired and largely unearned power to fortify <em>and substantiate with myth</em> their position at the top of the heap.</p>
<p>At any rate, in the book (as in reality), the remaining populace—either not exposed or more resistant—squabble and fight over the remaining resources and power centers. But it is hopeless, as the plague is unquestionably worse than anything humans can do to one another. Still, armies are raised, with the plague rejoicing at the close quarters and squalid conditions. </p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;At length the plague, slow-footed, but sure in her noiseless advance, destroyed the illusion, invading the congregation of the elect, and showering promiscuous death among them.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 396</div></div><p>Luckily, the main characters are largely untouched by the plague—at least until much later. This is another literary device she uses without explanation: she protects her characters from the ravages of the plague until a sufficiently dramatic end can be found for them.</p>
<p>This is, of course, artistic license and largely implausible since most of them were simultaneously selfless in caring for the sick day-in and day-out. Yet, none fell to the plague. Were we to assume it was because they were so good? That the plague couldn&rsquo;t get through the shield of their benevolence?</p>
<p>Lionel, Idris, and Adrian—now Lord Protector—rally the remains of humanity in England and strike out for warmer climes. The winters are brutal in England and humans can no longer survive there. Although the virus is worse in the summer, they still feel it would be better to move southward. There are trials and tribulations and they barely make it to the coast of France in their boats. There, they discover that those who preceded them had split into factions: on one side is Adrian and his benevolence; on the other is a brutal leader selling a story of protection from the plague in exchange for unquestioning fealty.</p>
<p>Lionel is integral in remediating this problem and the remains of humanity, once again united in purpose, continue to Switzerland, where they hope that the cool heights will provide agricultural plenty while protecting them from the estival ravages of the plague. The plague has other ideas. Only four survive the trek across France to Switzerland: Lionel, Adrian, and Raymond&rsquo;s two children, Clara and Evelyn). Lionel dwells a bit too pointedly on how lovely and smart Clara is—with intimations of rekindling humanity with her.</p>
<p>They shift to Milan and Como, spending several lovely years there, with only Evelyn succumbing to Typhus rather than the plague. </p>
<ol></ol><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;[…] one by one, beneath the ice-caves, beside the waters springing from the thawed snows of a thousand winters, another and yet another of the remnant of the race of Man, closed their eyes for ever to the light.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 413</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;"Thus are we left,&ldquo; said Adrian, &ldquo;two melancholy blasted trees, where once a forest waved. We are left to mourn, and pine, and die.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 416</div></div><p>Clara decides she needs to see where her father is buried in Greece. Lacking anything else to do, they endeavor across the Adriatic from Venice, but are shipwrecked, drowning Adrian and Clara. Lionel survives. We follow him on his physical and philosophical peregrinations, leaving him a few years later, after he&rsquo;d ascertained to a great degree of certainty that he was, indeed, the last man on Earth.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Yellow lightnings played around the vast dome of Mont Blanc, silent as the snow-clad rock they illuminated; all was bare, wild, and sublime, while the singing of the pines in melodious murmurings added a gentle interest to the rough magnificence.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 414</div></div><p>Imagine knowing that yours would be the last sentience to behold such a thing, that nature would present such shows for long eons, irrespective of observers. That the clockwork continues without us, as easily as with us. Not that we have become irrelevant, but that we always were.</p>
<p><hr></p>
<div class="footnote-reference"><span id="footnote_DRAFTABLE_ENTRY_3888_6_body" class="footnote-number">[6]</span> This sort of jarring flip-flop is a common feature. There&rsquo;s not a lot of subtlety to the emotions expressed by any of the characters. It&rsquo;s like humanity viewed through the lens of a teenager: everything is literally the best or the worst ever.</div><div class="footnote-reference"><span id="footnote_DRAFTABLE_ENTRY_3888_7_body" class="footnote-number">[7]</span> Idris never makes it off the island, and much effort and time is expended in making sure that her body is entombed in Windsor Castle, as if anyone at all cares where her plague-ridden corpse is interred, especially considering none of them will ever return to it.</div><p>I&rsquo;ve included <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=4040">notes, citations and errata</a> in a separate post.</p>
</div></dd>
<dt class="field"><span id="Naked">Naked Lunch (1959)</span></dt>
<dd><div class=" "><p>by <em>William S. Burroughs</em></p>
<p>This book is a stream-of-consciousness brain-dump of a junkie. In the afterword, Burroughs reveals—in refreshingly erudite prose—that he wrote some of the content the book during his withdrawal from a 15-year morphine addiction.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The addict regards his body impersonally as an instrument to absorb the medium in which he lives, evaluates his tissue with the cold hands of a horse trader. “No use trying to hit there.” Dead fish eyes flick over a ravaged vein.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 57</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The addict runs on junk time. His body is his clock, and junk runs through it like an hourglass. Time has meaning for him only with reference to his need. Then he makes his abrupt intrusion into the time of others, and, like all Outsiders, all Petitioners, he must wait, unless he happens to mesh with non-junk time.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 180</div></div><p>Much of the rest of the book was originally arose from correspondence with Allen Ginsberg, one of Burroughs&rsquo;s best friends and collaborators (and also a member of the &ldquo;Beat Generation&rdquo;) and with whom he was trying to kindle a romantic relationship.</p>
<p>The book is a labor of love by many people who helped Burroughs edit and shape the final work. He was adamant about its composition—even to the point of insisting on retaining obvious typos as intentional—and wanted it to read like it does. No chapter headings. Disjointed flow. No notion of storyline or chronology. Just a strong sense of common theme: on the surface, a story filtered through the mind of the junkie who wants nothing but more junk, but below that, a story of how a thinking person can hope to make their way through a world adamantly opposed to independent thought.</p>
<p>In the first third—the book was originally intended to be published in three parts, but all parties involved agreed that it stood better as a single work—there is a bit of a story of a man named Bill who flees cross-country to Mexico, with a rotating cast of companions—some real, some not—and an infinitude of places to cop and shack up and nod.</p>
<p>He writes of psychotic doctors and dealers and pushers and users. The hyperbolic prose freely mixes real-world events with fevered imaginings and dreams and heavily metaphoric renderings (e.g. the many, many hangings in the middle of the book involving people who keep coming back, again and again, in what would turn out—for the most part—to be faked hangings partaken by hangman and accused for a supposedly unparalleled sexual gratification).</p>
<p>He describes drugs and their effects lucidly, then disjointedly, weaving seemingly nonsensical prose—with heavy use of ellipses—into at-times vivid renderings of immediately recognizable real-world situations and locations. As Burroughs himself stated: it is not a novel. It is, at times, an epic poem.</p>
<ol></ol><p>The book does not tell a story—it delivers impressions, often very powerful ones. It is a maelstrom of words from an author whose deliberate rawness hides his frightening intelligence from anyone so inclined to allow it to be hidden. That is, if you want to be offended, you will be, missing out on the deeper message that the world itself is far more deeply offensive to anyone with a sensitivity to hypocrisy and an undiminished sense of justice. The raw language is  the only way to treat bad things honestly.</p>
<p>The at-time maniacal prose nearly always reveals the author to be a clinical observer—especially of people—recording exactly the details of a person or place that snaps it into sharp relief for the reader (for whom memory fills the spaces left by the skeleton of Burroughs&rsquo;s description).</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The café was built into one side of a stone ramp at the bottom of a high white canyon of masonry. Faces of The City poured through silent as fish, stained with vile addictions and insect lusts. The lighted café was a diving bell, cable broken, settling into black depths.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 44</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Up through the river towns, Babahoya, Quevedo, Puerto Limón, black Stetsons and the grey malaria faces color of dirty paper, muzzle-loading shotguns and vultures pecking in the streets&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 262</div></div><p>Sometimes he&rsquo;ll riff on what is almost certainly a real detail, an actual memory, supplementing it with a newly formed invention or one half-remembered from when he&rsquo;d picked up the detail. He&rsquo;ll tell of a young man he saw on a bus, then spend paragraphs describing the man&rsquo;s history or future, though he neither never knew him nor ever would, instead stitching the real world to the richer, more interesting, parallel one playing out in his head.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;A few sentences plucked from the whirl of details in his mind, of the world only he sees with a history only he knows.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 73</div></div><p>As noted above, the strong undercurrent of the book—for lack of a better word—is a surprisingly rational scream from a highly pragmatic man who did not prejudge, but instead partook. It warns of a world gone askew, in which those who can, and those who realize, and those who are wise to its mendacity, take refuge from it in the drugs that it forbids. The nation knows that its captives can escape its raw horror using drugs, and thus deprives its residents of all but the officially sanctioned varieties (e.g. alcohol and anti-depressants), guilting people into participating in the madness of American society instead. [8] In 1959 as today. Sorry, Bill; not much has changed. Not for most of us.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;“I can feel the heat closing in,” Burroughs writes, setting the tone for the entire book, although such heat has less to do with the police than with the futility of freedom in a world of systems designed to keep us from ourselves&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 290 (from the Afterword)</div></div><p>I&rsquo;ve included <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=4066">notes, citations and errata</a> in a separate post.</p>
</div></dd>
<dt class="field"><span id="Divide">The Divide: American Injustice in the Age of the Wealth Gap (2014)</span></dt>
<dd><div class=" "><p>by <em>Matt Taibbi</em></p>
<p>This book is nearly evenly divided between stories of how the poor in America are squeezed for all they are worth, made to pay with money and time for crimes that shouldn&rsquo;t even be crimes—or that they haven&rsquo;t even committed— while the wealthy, the elite, the so-called Masters of the Universe not only avoid punishment for much larger crimes that destroy countless lives, all in the name of consolidating filthy lucre to a self-selected elite: <span class="quote-inline">&ldquo;men and women who essentially as a matter of policy now will never see the inside of a courtroom, almost no matter what crimes they may have committed in the course of their business.&rdquo;</span></p>
<p>And let&rsquo;s all remember the huge difference: the people who steal a <em>lot</em> of money when they <em>already have</em> a lot of money are not being prosecuted. They are instead promoted to positions of power and influence. Those who have nothing and are stealing—or failing to properly report—<em>small</em> sums just in order to <em>survive</em> go to jail immediately and pay with time and money they cannot afford.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Unquestionably, however, something else is at work, something that cuts deeper into the American psyche. <strong>We have a profound hatred of the weak and the poor, and a corresponding groveling terror before the rich and successful</strong>, and we’re building a bureaucracy to match those feelings.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 117-119</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;[…] giant idiosyncratic bureaucracies that are designed to criminalize failure, poverty, and weakness on the one hand, and to immunize strength, wealth, and success on the other.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 144-146</div></div><p>This works not because those in power are exceptionally clever or better than we are. They&rsquo;re just initially luckier, be it by birth or by just dumb luck. Hard work does not necessarily get you into the special class, but any number of stupid trivialities can. They don&rsquo;t even have to be more clever than to <em>divide</em> and <em>conquer</em> (or control). They&rsquo;ve,</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;[…] arranged things so that the problem is basically invisible to most people, unless you go looking for it.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 162-163</div></div><p>This is nothing new, going back to the late 70s and early 80s—and having gotten a high-energy kick-start during Ronald Reagan&rsquo;s two terms (see <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=4138#the_reagans">my review of the 4-hour documentary <em>The Reagans</em></a> for more information).</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The cleaving of the country into two completely different states—one <strong>a small archipelago of hyperacquisitive untouchables</strong>, the other <strong>a vast ghetto of expendables with only theoretical rights</strong>—has been in the works a long time.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 13</div></div><p>Taibbi recounts the interesting mechanics of the fraud that led to the financial crash of 2008. To illustrate the &ldquo;divide&rdquo;, he juxtaposes what happened to people who orchestrated the greatest theft of all time versus people who break minor laws.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Once the bubble burst, lawsuits were filed everywhere and whistle-blowers emerged by the dozen, showing, in graphic documentary detail, how nearly every major financial company in America had chosen to participate in this enormous fraud. <strong>It was the very definition of systemic corruption, but</strong> curiously, despite what looked like mountains of evidence, <strong>almost nobody with any connection to the crisis was even threatened with criminal prosecution.</strong>&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 40</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;And as every individual who’s ever been charged with a crime knows, anyone facing criminal arrest can expect collateral consequences. <strong>A single drug <em>charge</em> can ruin a person’s chances for obtaining a student loan or a government job. It can nix his or her chances of getting housing aid or a whole range of services—even innocent members of your family may lose access to government benefits. You can lose your right to vote and your access to financial aid. You can even have your children taken away.</strong>&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 50</div></div><p>It&rsquo;s not that no-one cares, but that it seems to be unstoppable somehow.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The public defenders […] can’t do much about the convictions factory. They’re like partisans trying to slow an invasion by throwing their bodies under tank treads.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 115</div></div><p>The political will is with continuing this situation because it benefits all of the right people and doesn&rsquo;t affect anyone important, by definition. The law tiptoes around businesses and for a decent reason,</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Unless a company was corrupt through and through, it did seem reasonable to try to avoid destroying it and to protect the jobs of innocent employees if possible.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 67</div></div><p>But it got to the point where <span class="quote-inline">&ldquo;[t]he attorney general of the United States [admits] that he asks Wall Street for advice before he prosecutes Wall Street.&rdquo;</span> This was easier because the big boys could afford a lot of lawyers and put up a real fight, so <span class="quote-inline">&ldquo;[…] incompetent and lazy officials with a defense-lawyer mindset [would] avoid difficult contested trials and simply take cash up front and declare victory for the cameras.&rdquo;</span></p>
<p>On the other hand, <span class="quote-inline">&ldquo;You’ll never see a local prosecutor call a press conference and pat himself on the back for letting a car thief or a mugger of old ladies off with a fine.&rdquo;</span> Instead, police were vociferously encouraged to <em>create</em> crime on that  side of the ledger with incentives that spoke directly to their own personal gain—a nearly sure-fire method with most people, for whom principles are far down the list of priorities relative to enriching themselves.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;But the steep drop in violent crime presented police with a problem. If making arrests is the only way to advance in your career, but crime is dropping, what do you do? Furthermore, what to do if the only way to make a living wage is to rack up as much overtime as possible? In the Safir era, NYPD starting salaries were on the low end for professional police forces in America, beginning at about forty thousand dollars. How do you add hours in an era when crime is dropping?</p>
<p>&ldquo;The answer turned out to be, you simply create arrests. By multiplying marijuana arrests by a factor of ten in the space of a few years, Safir’s police force drastically increased its workload.&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 95</div></div><p>I think that the the starting pay of $40,000 as being &ldquo;too low&rdquo; is odd, though. I made less than that in 1994 when I started as a software developer. I might have been making that by 1998. We weren&rsquo;t living &ldquo;rich&rdquo;. We had no car and rented an apartment, but we were getting by without issue. I suppose a police officer isn&rsquo;t satisfied with living lower middle-class like we were and figured working overtime arresting people who hadn&rsquo;t committed crimes was an ethically defensible way of escaping that life.</p>
<p>In one case that Taibbi writes about, the main reason the state used to flush one man&rsquo;s life down the drain was that he had &ldquo;obstructed traffic&rdquo; on a sidewalk after he stepped out of a car at one in the morning to discover a cop who&rsquo;d popped up out of nowhere—on an otherwise empty sidewalk—to get between him and his own apartment&rsquo;s entrance.</p>
<p>To a normal person, this seems like the cop is obstructing the poor guy returning home from work. Since a cop can&rsquo;t be liable for something like that, it <em>must</em> be the <em>other</em> guy who committed a crime. The goal was to <em>create</em> a crime.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The obstructing traffic section is meant to apply to people who are willfully blocking cars or people on the sidewalk, or to be used as a tool for crowd control at things like protests, but in practice it’s code for being black on a Tuesday night.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 102</div></div><p>It gets more insidious, as charges are turned into convictions without sufficient proof simply by applying the punishment <em>before</em> trial.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;[…] if you don’t make bail, you’ll almost automatically spend at least [15-90 days] in jail waiting for trial. The state knows this, so essentially, charging a person who can’t make bail with a B misdemeanor is the same as convicting that person. You file the charge, the judge sets high bail, you go back inside, and then you eventually plead to time served, because, well, why not? You’ve already done the time.</p>
<p>&ldquo;The only difference is, you’ve got a conviction now, which means the next time you get arrested, the denial of bail—or a punishingly high bail—will be even more automatic.&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 117</div></div><p>Innocent people end up with criminal records because <span class="quote-inline">&ldquo;[…] the speedy trial concept […] is easily reduced to a complete joke.&rdquo;</span> and the system <span class="quote-inline">&ldquo;applies disproportionate punishment to the guilty.&rdquo;</span> Remember that, with the successful division of America, people aren&rsquo;t even aware that this is the system. They don&rsquo;t know that <span class="quote-inline">&ldquo;failure to follow a police order, no matter how stupid or unreasonable, is cause for an arrest or a summons.&rdquo;</span> Combine that with the foot-dragging above, and a <span class="quote-inline">&ldquo;prosecutor can essentially turn any misdemeanor case against almost anyone into a de facto conviction […]&rdquo;</span> That <span class="quote-inline">&ldquo;[…] puts an entire segment of the population constantly on the defensive, gives it a criminal record essentially in advance.&rdquo;</span></p>
<p>Taibbi now moves on to contrast that system with what happens when Dick Fuld and Lehman Brothers steal and waste a truly tremendous amount of money. Unlike with poor people, where petty, mostly victimless crime is manufactured, in this case large-scale theft from thousands—if not hundreds of thousands—of victims is completely ignored, letting the criminals steal more and more from more and more victims until the criminal finally stops on their own when the system—rather than the regulators—decide that enough&rsquo;s enough.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;What’s amazing about this is that the Fed saw fit as early as January 2008 to warn Chase about Lehman’s instability. But nobody ever warned the public. Nobody stepped in after the bank cooked its books in Repo 105, or misreported taxes, or made fake disclosures, or lied outright to investors. Nothing was done. The government merely sat back and watched the catastrophe unfold, allowing new victims to pour money into the walking-dead bank right up until its collapse.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 152</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The deals the government and Wall Street worked out that weekend […] transform[ed] America into a permanent oligarchical bailout state. <strong>This was, essentially, a formal merger of Wall Street and the U.S. government.</strong>&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 156</div></div><p>Barclays stepped in to &ldquo;bail out&rdquo; Lehmen Brothers for what they claimed was &ldquo;cost&rdquo; but ended up skimming $5B from the top, <em>stealing</em> it from the owners of Lehman Brothers, who were <em>already</em> being screwed from the original mismanagement. Now, Barclays was stealing even more money from them, all with the oversight and blessing of the government. Instead of a candy bar from a bodega, it was $5B from retirement accounts.</p>
<p>Next, Taibbi takes us to Georgia, where we learn how the police milk the local immigrant population by inventing crimes to produce fines and settlements to bolster the local tax base.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The squad cars perch on the sides of the road like ticks on a vein, hauling in alien after undocumented alien and tossing them into the criminal justice/deportation hopper. From there, in a complex, arbitrary, and mindlessly cruel legal process that puts people literally in chains for the crime of going to work or taking their kids to school, the detainees get ground up into a rich financial and political meal, shared in nearly equal parts by state and federal authorities on the one hand and private prison companies on the other.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 201</div></div><p>Because of the residency status of these people, they are de-facto afforded fewer rights. This amounts to conditional rights, depending on how much money you have.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;For a country founded on the idea that rights are inalienable and inherent from birth, <strong>we’ve developed a high tolerance for conditional rights and conditional citizenship.</strong> And the one condition, it turns out, is money. If you have a lot of it, the legal road you get to travel is well lit and beautifully maintained. If you don’t, it’s a dark alley and most Americans would be shocked to find out what’s at the end of it.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 208</div></div><p>It is about money, and it&rsquo;s definitely a class thing, but how can we do this to fellow human beings, just because they don&rsquo;t have that much money? That, alone, wouldn&rsquo;t be enough, which is why we mix in race-based alienation to make <em>everything OK</em></p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;This seemed to represent the ultimate white-folks win-win: local chicken-plant owners got to keep their cheap labor, while local police still got to milk the immigrant community for any money they made working at those plants.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 229</div></div><p>On the other side of the ledger, if you&rsquo;re rich and white, you can run a scam for 13 years and nothing happens until the scam collapses under its own weight (pretty much how Lehman brothers did).</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Madoff actually went more than thirteen years without making a single stock purchase and yet somehow survived several SEC investigations […]&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 256</div></div><p>So there&rsquo;s Madoff, who scams millions, if not billions, out of other rich people by <em>not</em> making trades. And then there are the guys who coordinate to generate artificial trades—and interest—to drive a stock price up so they can sell at that artificially inflated rate.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;To <a href="https://www.investopedia.com/terms/p/paintingthetape.asp">paint the tape</a> on ADM, Graber and Israel would call eight different brokers and put in buy orders simultaneously to run up the price—at a time when Graber was holding lots of the stock ready to sell into a rising market. It was a racket the Securities and Exchange Commission was hopelessly ill-equipped to stop.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 257</div></div><p>In case it wasn&rsquo;t clear how that worked: this in insider trading. The hedge funds have prior access to information that no-one else in the market has access to, simply because they pay the analysts more for it.</p>
<p>Everyone else gets screwed in a market that ends up reflecting only the interests of the already ultra-rich. And these people are just getting richer because they&rsquo;re already rich and stealing from others. They&rsquo;re worth billions and stealing <em>more</em> from those who have, relatively, nothing to give. Where that should be a <em>greater</em> crime because it&rsquo;s more morally bankrupt than stealing to buy food, <em>this</em> is the crime that goes unpunished.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Tipping off a hedge fund that your analyst is going to give a “buy” rating to a stock weeks before that research is made public can be enormously valuable to the hedge fund, for the obvious reason that the fund now has a pretty good idea of a concrete date and time when the stock is going to tick upward.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 267</div></div><p>It&rsquo;s essentially like when Biff had that almanac of sports facts when he traveled back in time in <em>Back to the Future II</em>. Hedge-fund traders know the future and are no longer taking any risk. No-one else in the market has access to this information and, mysteriously, they don&rsquo;t seem to do as well as these hedge funds.</p>
<p>Next, Taibbi tells the story of a how a cabal of these hedge-fund traders convinced themselves to go short on a Canadian company (they were gambling that the value of the company would go down by a certain date). When they realized they were wrong, instead of eating their losses—as the rest of us would—they instead employed clumsy, quasi-Mafia tactics to try to force the company to lose value.</p>
<p>This is the alternative to predicting the future. If, for whatever reason, you still guessed incorrectly (or the information you stole turns out to not be reliable), then you can still commit <em>other</em> crimes try to <em>change</em> the future so your bet <em>still</em> pays off. Naturally, since you&rsquo;re rich, none of these things count as crimes.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;[…] in a city where police in some neighborhoods define crime as standing on the sidewalk the wrong way, these idiots took their stock-trading act-like-a-thug life, screwed it up a hundred different ways, and not only couldn’t get arrested, they couldn’t even get police of any kind to notice.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 275</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Twenty-six billion dollars of fraud: no felony cases. But when the stakes are in the hundreds of dollars, we kick in 26,000 doors a year, in just one county.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 323</div></div><p>It seems the police just weren&rsquo;t looking for crime where they knew it wouldn&rsquo;t be (i.e. they weren&rsquo;t manufacturing it there). And this isn&rsquo;t just grossly unfair, but the larger, ignored crime has a <em>ton</em> of collateral damage, in the form of investors (often pension and index funds and 401K mutual funds) who lost money on completely fictitious and artificially generated market movement. </p>
<p>There was no actual economic benefit—the common defense the finance industry has for itself—because <span class="quote-inline">&ldquo;[t]he entire thing was a battle of public relations. It had nothing to do with real economics.&rdquo;</span> Anyone who claims that the free market is doing its job of &ldquo;price finding&rdquo; is either a fool or a liar.</p>
<p>This is a system with two, quasi-official sets of rights.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Over and over again, we hear that if you owe money in a certain way, or if you receive a certain kind of public assistance, you forfeit this or that line item in the Bill of Rights. If you’re a person of means, you get full service for all ten amendments, and even a few that aren’t listed. But if you owe, if you rent, you get a slightly thinner, more tubercular version of the Fourth Amendment, the First Amendment, the Fifth and Sixth Amendments, and so on.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 319</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;As Americans, we’re all beginning to develop a second sense about who gets to feel the business end of the criminal justice system, and when, and who doesn’t, and why. <strong>That second sense</strong> we all carry around in our minds <strong>is our true government.</strong> […] Schoolhouse Rock! teaches us that everyone is treated equally under the law […] but at the same time we somehow know not to be surprised when that turns out not to be completely true.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 321</div></div><p>It&rsquo;s more about class than race. The line is drawn between the reprehensible, mooching poor and the deserving, job-creating wealthy. </p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;It’s not that it’s written anywhere that if you’re black and you live in the projects, you don’t get protection against illegal searches—it just sort of works out that way. And if this makes any sense at all, it’s not about skin color. This is a cultural kind of bias. White people who live the wrong way get caught in the net, too.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 319</div></div><p>Hatred of the poor is more deeply embedded and unchangeable than racism. Racism has actually decreased over the years. It&rsquo;s obviously still a problem, but it&rsquo;s much better than it was—albeit because it was so appallingly bad before—whereas inequality has <em>increased</em> dramatically. Middle-class blacks are just as disdainful of poor blacks as middle-class whites are (do you remember when Chris Rock had a long bit about <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Niggas_vs._Black_People&#039;">Niggas vs. Black People</a> in <em>Bring the Pain</em>?)</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;[This system] attacks people without money, particularly nonwhite people, with a weirdly venomous kind of hatred, treating them like they’re already guilty of something, which of course they are—namely, being that which we’re all afraid of becoming.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 324</div></div><p>Almost as strong as hatred of the poor is reverence for the rich, something I haven&rsquo;t noticed in any other country. It&rsquo;s deep-down, bone-stupid to revere the rich, sucking up their fairy tales about how they got to be that way and you didn&rsquo;t. As Taibbi puts in, hand in hand, these</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;[…] twin impulses […] drive modern America: burning hatred of all losers and the poor, and breathless, abject worship of the rich, even the talentless and undeserving rich.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 324</div></div><p>You don&rsquo;t need to be smart or good or anything commendable to get into the privileged club. You just have to somehow have a lot of money: inherit it, steal it, it doesn&rsquo;t matter. Once you have it, you&rsquo;re protected. Go big or go home…or to jail. If you commit crimes <em>while</em> you&rsquo;re big, though…you just add to your fortune, but don&rsquo;t have to worry about going to jail. You have to worry about the size of your fan club growing too big.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;These bureaucracies accomplish just two things: they make small piles of money smaller and big piles of money bigger.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 326</div></div><p>Taibbi tells the story of Marishka, a young woman—one who&rsquo;s made mistakes, yes—trying to make ends meet. Does she get even a real first chance, to say nothing of a second one? No. She&rsquo;s not rich. Instead,</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;[…] she was about to become more heavily scrutinized by the state than any twelve Wall Street bankers put together.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 333</div></div><p>Helping her would cost nearly nothing and could help her a lot. Helping hedge-fund brokers steal billions costs a tremendous amount and helps only a small group of thieves who already had more money than they knew what to do with in the first place. But we are trained to believe that Marishka is guilty until proven innocent and that the hedge-fund trader doesn&rsquo;t even exist.</p>
<p>Taibbi has a way of presenting the facts in a way that shows the glaring irony of this two-class system.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;For instance, in 2011, the state of Ohio—the same state that lost tens of millions in the early 2000s when its pension fund bought severely overpriced mortgage-backed securities from a Lehman Brothers banker named John Kasich, who would later become governor—tried to recoup some of its losses by sending out 22,000 notices to Ohioans seeking “overpayments” in either welfare or food stamps.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 341</div></div><p>In other words, Ohio elected the guy whose company bilked its state-pension fund out of <span class="quote-inline">&ldquo;tens of millions&rdquo;</span> to be <em>its governor</em> while it scrambled to bolster its budget by scrabbling back amounts in the tens to hundreds of dollars for what it called <span class="quote-inline">&ldquo;overpayments&rdquo;</span> (a claim that, in many cases, was highly dubious) from <em>welfare recipients</em>. Because the rich are unassailable, we attack the poor. Not only are the rich unassailable, they are <em>rewarded</em> with <em>governerships</em>.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;[…] the only offenders the local burghers will spend money to embarrass publicly are young, single, nonwhite mothers guilty of the [alleged] crime of improperly receiving benefits.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 349</div></div><p>This was not just a Reagan or Bush thing. This was also a Clinton and Obama thing. This is an American Ruling Class thing.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Bill Clinton’s political formula for seizing the presidency was simple. He made money tight in the ghettos and let it flow free on Wall Street. He showered the projects with cops and bean counters and pulled the cops off the beat in the financial services sector. And in one place he created vast new mountain ranges of paperwork, while in another, paperwork simply vanished.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 351</div></div><p>It is the way that they keep themselves as the ruling class. For 99% of the participants, there is no discernible difference from a monarchy. There is no underlying principle except for the rich to get much richer and the poor to feel guilty about not being richer, all the while being milked <em>every damned day</em>. A self-selected and smug minority can&rsquo;t fail, while everyone else can do nothing <em>but</em> fail. It&rsquo;s no wonder people are angry, but their anger is wildly misdirected.</p>
<p>This is the American Myth. It is a palace of lies built by many, but benefitting only a few. Many that support it would probably do at least as well or even better under a fairer, more just, more moral, and more principled system, but they&rsquo;re terrified of changing horses and falling into the giant crack of poverty they&rsquo;ve created.</p>
<p>They won&rsquo;t rock the boat for a <em>principle</em>, for fear that they&rsquo;ll lose the unearned gains they&rsquo;ve accrued—and continue to accrue—from the unprincipled system that they do support. So they hear, believe, and repeat to themselves the stories that the losers in this system deserve what they get—just as the winners do. To admit anything else would lead to a psychic collapse. <a href="https://youtu.be/VImnpErdDzA">Are We the Baddies?</a></p>
<p>One of the big problems is that hating a poor person for not reporting they got an extra $25 of benefits per week is somehow easy. At any rate, it&rsquo;s easy to understand what they&rsquo;re being accused of—and feeling righteous about it.</p>
<p>Hating a bank for setting up laws that put its president in charge of bailouts to <em>his own bank</em> at a federal organization, effective loaning himself billions in government money at 0% interest to buy out competitors at bargain-basement prices, prices that were artificially depressed by a collapsed bubble that he and his bank created is … somehow more difficult to understand.</p>
<p>Taibbi provides the details below:</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;[…] WaMu and its $307 billion in assets were delivered by the state into the hands of Chase and its CEO, Jamie Dimon, for the preposterously low price of $1.9 billion, a bargain deal that was struck just a few weeks before Chase was given $25 billion in cash by the government as part of the TARP bailouts. This was Chase’s second sweetheart deal in less than a year.</p>
<p>&ldquo;Six months before, in March 2008, Chase had “rescued” the imploding investment banking giant Bear Stearns, buying the venerable firm with the aid of $29 billion in guarantees extended by the New York branch of the Federal Reserve—whose chairman of the board of directors at the time was, get this, JPMorgan Chase CEO Jamie Dimon.</p>
<p>&ldquo;That means that six months after Jamie Dimon was the lucky recipient of his own Federal Reserve bailout in order to acquire Bear Stearns, his bank was given another $25 billion in cash by the state to go on another shopping spree, cash he used, among other things, to buy Washington Mutual.&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 359</div></div><p>You see? It&rsquo;s so complicated that the average mortal will doubt their ability to judge whether something shady happened or not. But it&rsquo;s <em>brainwashing</em>. They&rsquo;ve brainwashed you into believing that you are completely able to judge the indigent—without needing any background information, which is almost always morally, if not legally, exonerating—but are utterly incapable of judging financial malfeasance and fraud several orders of magnitude larger and more damaging, even when it stinks to high heaven.</p>
<p>In the first case, we <em>know</em> they&rsquo;re guilty because we can judge <em>downwards</em>, but in the second, we <em>defer</em> to the criminals, who we assume are just much smarter than us. We are jealous of their success and attribute it to their being superior—else we&rsquo;d have to think we were somehow inferior or had been suckered in some way. If they don&rsquo;t do too much damage to us personally, we let it slide, rather than examine that whole house of psychological cards.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The crucial thing to understand is that if businesses like consumer credit cards are going to give cards away in the mail to everyone with a pulse, then the process almost by definition has to involve fraud.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 383</div></div><p>Why doesn&rsquo;t our bullshit detector go off for this stuff? We take to the streets to protest COVID, we believe the Earth is flat, that the towers were taken down by the Bush administration, that Russia stole the election—we fight like mad for stupid, unsubstantiated shit <em>that doesn&rsquo;t even affect us</em> (not really), but then don&rsquo;t trust ourselves to say anything when someone is blowing smoke up our collective asses in <em>to steal everything we have</em>?</p>
<p>This leads to people like Obama telling us with a straight face that <em>nothing actually illegal happened</em>, that <span class="quote-inline">&ldquo;Banks are in the business of making money […a]nd they find loopholes.&rdquo;</span>, which is <em>bullshit</em>. They break laws that are unenforced. They <em>undo</em> laws that they don&rsquo;t like. They <em>illegally</em> bribe legislators to add loopholes for themselves before <em>driving through them</em>.</p>
<p>They are the kids on the playground who change the rules mid-game, then declare victory <em>and we believe them</em>. Not only that: <em>we worship them</em>.</p>
<p>The final financial sector volume deals with a woman whose job was to sniff out credit-card fraud. She found it in her own bank, blew the whistle, and was fired for it. The transactions all proceeded unfettered. All of it was vastly illegal—fraud of the highest order—with several layers of beneficiaries all sucking illegal gains out of a helpless target, already mired in poverty and debt.</p>
<p>This is a &ldquo;market&rdquo; built on obvious subterfuges intended to generate predictable outcomes and revenue.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;[…] in a huge percentage of credit card cases, the cardholder never even sees the summons and consequently never appears in court to defend himself.</p>
<p>&ldquo;[…] the bulk of the credit card collection business is conducted without any supporting documentation showing up or being seen by human eyes at any part of the process. The meat of the business is collecting unopposed default judgments from defendants who either never receive a summons or receive one and never appear in court.</p>
<p>&ldquo;[…] At no time in the process do most collectors ever actually need to produce evidence of a legitimate debt or a legitimate judgment.&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 374–376</div></div><p>What&rsquo;s stopping them from making them up wholesale? You wouldn&rsquo;t be able to tell the difference. If no-one checks, then you don&rsquo;t serve and just make up a number for a nonexistent card and garnish their wages after judgment. Why even buy accounts from Chase? You don&rsquo;t need them for this scam.</p>
<p>This is largely how it works, although they do seem try to get actual outstanding debts—which is not that hard to do in 21-century America. Once they&rsquo;ve obtained a judgment against a wholly unaware victim without ever having shown any evidence, they then leverage other laws they&rsquo;ve engineered that let them garnish wages in most states.</p>
<p>The company doing the garnishing almost never has anything to do with the company to which that person actually owes money. You borrow from A and B ends up garnishing your wages with no accountability or evidence and nothing other than a court proceeding with a default judgment in favor of the plaintiff because the defendant was never aware that it had even occurred. The first they know about it is when the notice a line item on their paycheck. This is a business model that actually exists—but only affects people you&rsquo;ve never met, so it&rsquo;s OK.</p>
<ol></ol><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;What this means is that the entire business model for something like Chase’s credit card business is not much more than a gigantic welfare fraud scheme. These companies borrow hundreds of billions of dollars from the Fed at rock-bottom rates, then turn around and lend it out to the world at 5, 10, 15, 20 percent, as credit cards and mortgages, boat loans and aircraft loans, and so on.</p>
<p>&ldquo;If you pay it back, great, it’s a 500 percent or 1,000 percent or 4,000 percent profit for the bank. If you don’t pay it back, the company can put your name in the hopper to be sued. A $5,000 debt on a credit card for the now-defunct Circuit City, which was actually a Chase card, became a $13,000 or $14,000 debt by the time the bank finished applying fees and penalties.&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 382</div></div><p>Banks profiting from fraud perpetrated on welfare recipients is a direct relationship across the &ldquo;divide&rdquo; described in the book&rsquo;s title. It really pulls everything together.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;When the state brings a fraud case against a welfare mom, it brings it with disgust, with rage, because in addition to committing the legal crime, <strong>she’s committed the political crime of being needy and an eyesore.</strong> Banks commit the legal crime of fraud wholesale; […] But they’re not charged, because there’s no political crime. <strong>The system is not disgusted by the organized, mechanized search for profit. It’s more like it’s impressed by it.</strong>&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 383</div></div><p>And thing to remember is that, while the bank has <span class="quote-inline">&ldquo;entire departments committed to [fraud]&rdquo;</span>, the individual often <em>doesn&rsquo;t commit a crime at all</em>, as Taibbi repeatedly pointed out throughout the book. The welfare cheating is sometimes or even often just clerical errors. Credit card debt is active fraud.</p>
<p>Instead of prosecuting giant crimes by unacceptable perpetrators, they&rsquo;re inventing and then prosecuting smaller ones, on victims who&rsquo;ve been made politically acceptable by brainwashing campaigns sponsored by the perpetrators of the fraud. They teach us to hate the poor (and ourselves) and revere the rich (them), then make themselves richer than the obscenely rich that they already are, while we cheer them on as they rob our comrades and neighbors.</p>
<p>That this is how it&rsquo;s ended up bespeaks a corruption, a failure at the institutional level on a grand scale. If the government <em>chooses</em> to avoid prosecutions in favor of a non-controlling financial settlement, then that amounts to <em>the government getting a cut of the action.</em> This is the established model now. Fool me once, shame on you; fool me twice, shame on me. The banks will do it again and the government will get its fee.</p>
<p>This drives a conveyor belt of lucre from a permanent impoverished underclass to increasingly unassailable royalty. That&rsquo;s a business relationship or I can&rsquo;t tell the difference.</p>
<p>I&rsquo;ve included <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=4082">notes, citations and errata</a> in a separate post.</p>
</div></dd>
<dt class="field"><span id="Tropic">Tropic of Cancer (1934)</span></dt>
<dd><div class=" "><p>by <em>Henry Miller</em></p>
<p>This book feels like an autobiographical novel about Miller&rsquo;s long stay in Paris as a relatively poor, struggling writer. It chains together notes and snippets and observations about life and people he knew to form a vague sort of history of a man with very few cares, a man accustomed to poverty, a man with a rich inner life, a man who&rsquo;s left behind a wife and family. Occasional and intense longing for this family is generously tempered with indifference and laxity.</p>
<p>He lives in Paris, thinking nearly exclusively of where he&rsquo;s going to get his next meal, but also where his next prostitute will come from. The second being almost more important because he often goes without a meal longer than without a fuck.</p>
<p>This nearly incessant rutting is, honestly, incongruous with the supposedly erudite author. How he&rsquo;s able to get anything done while simultaneously post-coitally stunned and starving is impressive. He is, at times, quite eloquent in expressing his deep regard for women, even if it is from a nearly purely sexual angle.</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The earth is not an arid plateau of health and comfort, but a great sprawling female with velvet torso that swells and heaves with ocean billows; she squirms beneath a diadem of sweat and anguish. Naked and sexed she rolls among the clouds in the violet light of the stars. All of her, from her generous breasts to her gleaming thighs, blazes with furious ardor.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>He can almost always transform a minor windfall or payment into a roof over his head for a month or two. This is more than sufficient security for him and doesn&rsquo;t worry him enough to make him change the aforementioned priorities.</p>
<p>At one point, he comes up with a plan to take advantage of the good graces and manners of some of his more well-to-do friends—his erudition having gotten him into social circles that his very meager means never could.</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;And then it occurred to me, like a flash, that no one would refuse a man a meal if only he had the courage to demand it. I went immediately to a café and wrote a dozen letters.</p>
<p>&ldquo;“Would you let me have dinner with you once a week? Tell me what day is most convenient for you.”</p>
<p>&ldquo;It worked like a charm. I was not only fed… I was feasted. Every night I went home drunk. […]&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote><p>The book ends largely as it began, with Miller in Paris, debauched and writing and drinking and fucking and peregrinating by day from one café and bar to another and by night from one rented room or mooched living situation to another.</p>
<p>The remainder of this review will be largely annotated citations, which hopefully give a better impression of the book&rsquo;s philosophical passages.</p>
<p>At times, he writes like <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=4066">Burroughs in <em>Naked Lunch</em></a>, of what are obviously hallucinatory trips through Paris.</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;I lean out the window and the Eiffel Tower is fizzing champagne; it is built entirely of numbers and shrouded in black lace. The sewers are gurgling furiously. There are nothing but roofs everywhere, laid out with execrable geometric cunning.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>At other times, his metaphors are more down-to-Earth, but no less enchanting, as when describes a woman lying on her deathbed.<br>
 </p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Two waxen hands lying listlessly on the bedspread and along the pale veins the fluted murmur of a shell repeating the legend of its birth.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>There are some long passages of this kind of mental peregrination, with some philosophical musing that doesn&rsquo;t move what little there is of a plot forward in any way. It&rsquo;s nicely written, though, and segues into the segments where he directly and autobiographically addresses what it&rsquo;s like to be a writer, especially one who&rsquo;s achieved a modicum of success and who has acquired a fan base that expects more.</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Great God! what have I turned into? What right have you people to clutter up my life, steal my time, probe my soul, suckle my thoughts, have me for your companion, confidant, and information bureau? What do you take me for? Am I an entertainer on salary, required every evening to play an intellectual farce under your stupid noses? Am I a slave, bought and paid for, to crawl on my belly in front of you idlers and lay at your feet all that I do and all that I know? Am I a wench in a brothel who is called upon to lift her skirts or take off her chemise at the bidding of the first man in a tailored suit who comes along?&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>The process of writing—and of finding something to write, of expressing the tumult of disorganized brilliance jostling in the author&rsquo;s head—is given much thought as well. The following passage viscerally describes a writer&rsquo;s block engendered by the inability to get started because of a fear of mimicry, made only worse by the author reading more and more voraciously in an effort to <em>prove</em> that their own ideas are original. This education informs the author&rsquo;s own ideas, making them hesitant to write down what are now suspected be unoriginal thoughts.</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;[…] And so, instead of tackling his book, he reads one author after another in order to make absolutely certain that he is not going to tread on their private property. And the more he reads the more disdainful he becomes. None of them are satisfying; none of them arrive at that degree of perfection which he has imposed on himself. And forgetting completely that he has not written as much as a chapter he talks about them condescendingly, quite as though there existed a shelf of books bearing his name, books which everyone is familiar with and the titles of which it is therefore superfluous to mention.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>He is convinced, though, that being an author—or any sort of creative person—is superior, somehow, to the common runner of the rat race, if only because these creations impart fleeting moments of glory and joy not only to those best able to appreciate them—the creatives—but also to those benighted rat-race runners. A little light is better than nothing.</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;[…] now and then we encounter pages that explode, pages that wound and sear, that wring groans and tears and curses, know that they come from a man with his back up, a man whose only defenses left are his words and his words are always stronger than the lying, crushing weight of the world, stronger than all the racks and wheels which the cowardly invent to crush out the miracle of personality.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>He is an expatriate who feels infinitely more at home in his adopted city than in the city of his birth. He contrasts <span class="quote-inline">&ldquo;[a]nd God knows, when spring comes to Paris the humblest mortal alive must feel that he dwells in paradise.&rdquo;</span> with <span class="quote-inline">&ldquo;New York! […] A whole city erected over a hollow pit of nothingness. Meaningless. Absolutely meaningless.&rdquo;</span> At the same time, he knows that the Parisians, who allow him to live among them, view him—and his fellow ex-pats, whom he naturally views as less-well-integrated—as madmen, unable to understand reality in anything approaching a mature fashion.</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;No wonder they think we’re all crazy. We are crazy to them. We’re just a pack of children. Senile idiots. What we call life is a five-and-ten-cent store romance. That enthusiasm underneath—what is it? That cheap optimism which turns the stomach of any ordinary European? It’s illusion. No, illusion’s too good a word for it. Illusion means something. No, it’s not that—it’s delusion. It’s sheer delusion, that’s what.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>It&rsquo;s not just Miller who lives this life; among the many descriptions of friends and acquaintances, there is this succinct one of Kepi, whose description hits a bit too close to home for the author, I suspect.</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Kepi is interesting, in a way, because he has absolutely no ambition except to get a fuck every night. Every penny he makes, and they are damned few, he squanders in the dance halls. He has a wife and eight children in Bombay, but that does not prevent him from proposing marriage to any little femme de chambre who is stupid and credulous enough to be taken in by him.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>At one point, he gets a steady job as a copy-editor. He writes of the passing of a co-worker, a man named Peckover, who&rsquo;d never been worth <span class="quote-inline">&ldquo;a good goddamn&rdquo;</span> as either a friend or a journalist but who, after dying a ludicrous death in an elevator shaft he&rsquo;d somehow not noticed was wide open, is covered in encomiums by most of his other, former, and more hypocritical coworkers.</p>
<p>Here, Miller writes of the fool who&rsquo;d written the man&rsquo;s obituary.</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Joe and I, who knew Peckover well and who knew also that he wasn’t worth a good goddamn, even a few tears, we felt annoyed with this drunken sentimentality. We wanted to tell him so too, but with a guy like that you can’t afford to be honest; you have to buy a wreath and go to the funeral and pretend that you’re miserable. And you have to congratulate him too for the delicate obituary he’s written. He’ll be carrying his delicate little obituary around with him for months, praising the shit out of himself for the way he handled the situation.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>Miller and his friend and co-worker Joe, on the other hand, are in no way tethered by social mores.</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;There are people in this world who cut such a grotesque figure that even death renders them ridiculous. And the more horrible the death the more ridiculous they seem. It’s no use trying to invest the end with a little dignity—you have to be a liar and a hypocrite to discover anything tragic in their going. And since we didn’t have to put on a false front we could laugh about the incident to our heart’s content. We laughed all night about it, and in between times we vented our scorn and disgust for the guys upstairs, the fatheads who were trying to persuade themselves, no doubt, that Peckover was a fine fellow and that his death was a catastrophe.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>It is, at heart, an existentialist novel, with many formulations and much pondering about what life really means—and coming to the conclusion that meaning is fleeting and not worth pursuing.</p>
<p>For example, there is this lovely passage describing the actual coupling after he&rsquo;s hunted and &ldquo;captured&rdquo; a prostitute with FF15. He acknowledges that only the pursuit offered him anything—and that the prostitute similarly seemed less-than-interested in the whole affair. It&rsquo;s all meaningless, but pursued by both parties nonetheless.</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;We haven’t any passion either of us. And as for her, one might as well expect her to produce a diamond necklace as to show a spark of passion. But there’s the fifteen francs and something has to be done about it. It’s like a state of war: the moment the condition is precipitated nobody thinks about anything but peace, about getting it over with. And yet nobody has the courage to lay down his arms, to say, “I’m fed up with it… I’m through.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>This meaninglessness goes largely unacknowledged, with man seeking to imbue meaning (much as his co-workers used the occasion of Peckover&rsquo;s death) to a life otherwise lived from day to day, with no overarching purpose. If Peckover&rsquo;s life was worthless, then what of one&rsquo;s own? Best to sing Peckover&rsquo;s praises in order to convince oneself of one&rsquo;s own worth. </p>
<p>Miller seems to argue that this is the root of man&rsquo;s evil—an inability to just be at peace with inconsequence.</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;For some reason or other man looks for the miracle, and to accomplish it he will wade through blood. He will debauch himself with ideas, he will reduce himself to a shadow if for only one second of his life he can close his eyes to the hideousness of reality. Everything is endured—disgrace, humiliation, poverty, war, crime, ennui—in the belief that overnight something will occur, a miracle, which will render life tolerable.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;It’s like a man in the trenches again: he doesn’t know any more why he should go on living, because if he escapes now he’ll only be caught later, but he goes on just the same, and even though he has the soul of a cockroach and has admitted as much to himself, give him a gun or a knife or even just his bare nails, and he’ll go on slaughtering and slaughtering, <strong>he’d slaughter a million men rather than stop and ask himself why.</strong>&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>In the next passage, Miller offers an empathetic view of an otherwise societally excoriated profession i.e. &ldquo;Pimpin&rsquo; ain&rsquo;t easy&rdquo;.</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;You don’t think that a pimp is inhuman, I hope? A pimp has his private grief and misery too, don’t you forget. Perhaps he would like nothing better than to stand on the corner every night with a pair of white dogs and watch them piddle. Perhaps he would like it if, when he opened the door, he would see her there reading the Paris-Soir, her eyes already a little heavy with sleep. Perhaps it isn’t so wonderful, when he bends over his Lucienne, to taste another man’s breath. Better maybe to have only three francs in your pocket and a pair of white dogs that piddle on the corner than to taste those bruised lips.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>There are several passages that lament what industrial society has done to man, even back in 1934, when it had gotten a good start but hadn&rsquo;t even begun to dream of the ravages it would achieve by the end of the century. In particular, it is cities that are the <span class="quote-inline">&ldquo;machine [squeezing the] last drop of juice&rdquo;</span> from people.</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;I am speaking naturally of that world which is peculiar to the big cities, the world of men and women whose last drop of juice has been squeezed out by the machine—the martyrs of modern progress.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>In a roundabout way, he explains his indolent lifestyle as a desire to avoid the zero-sum rat race—the <span class="quote-inline">&ldquo;harness&rdquo;</span>. Industry eradicates everything in its path with its endless cry to move <span class="quote-inline">&ldquo;Forward!&rdquo;</span> without thinking at all of why. As acknowledged elsewhere, there is no &ldquo;why&rdquo;, but then what&rsquo;s the point of this enslavement of man to this industrial goal?</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;All over the States I wandered, and into Canada and Mexico. The same story everywhere. If you want bread you’ve got to get in harness, get in lock step. Over all the earth a gray desert, a carpet of steel and cement. Production! More nuts and bolts, more barbed wire, more dog biscuits, more lawn mowers, more ball bearings, more high explosives, more tanks, more poison gas, more soap, more toothpaste, more newspapers, more education, more churches, more libraries, more museums. Forward!&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>Without acknowledging that his debauched life in Paris depends on a several strata of just such workers providing the fruits of a society that can sustain his mooching, Miller has mostly disdain for those who have chosen—or been forced—to take up the harness instead of throwing it off, like he has. Recall that he has abandoned a family in another country.</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;There was nothing to distinguish them from the clods whom they would later wipe their boots on. They were zeros in every sense of the word, ciphers who form the nucleus of a respectable and lamentable citizenry.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>This book is most definitely the kind that depends very much on what you bring to it. Therefore, it will feel different depending on when in your life you read it. Everything is subjective and very little is as meaningful as it appears.</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;[…] it is here that one reads again the books of his youth and the enigmas take on new meanings, one for every white hair.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>I&rsquo;ve included <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=4095">notes, citations and errata</a> in a separate post.</p>
</div></dd>
</dl>      </div>
      </div>
        <div class="footer">
    <div class="footer-data"><div class="footer-links"><ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/contact.php" title="">Contact</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/support.php" title="">Support</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/privacy.php" title="">Privacy</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/rights.php" title="">Rights</a></li></ul></div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="copyright">Copyright (c) 1999-2026 earthli.com. All Rights Reserved.</div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="versions">Powered by <ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore/app_news.php">earthli News 3.7</a></li><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore" title="">earthli WebCore&trade; 3.7</a></li></ul></div></div>    </div>
      </div>
  </div>  </body>
</html>
]]>
  </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
      <title type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[The Divide: American Injustice in the Age of the Wealth Gap by Matt Taibbi (2014; read in 2020)]]>
  </title>
    <id>https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=4082</id>
    <link href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=4082"/>
    <updated>2021-01-03T17:10:45+01:00</updated>
    <author>
        <name type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[Marco von Ballmoos]]>
  </name>
      <uri>https://earthli.com/users/marco</uri>
    </author>
      <summary type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<blockquote class="quote abstract "><div>Disclaimer: these are notes I took while reading this book. They include citations I found interesting or enlightening or particularly well-written. In some cases, I&rsquo;ve pointed out which of these applies to which citation; in others, I have not. Any benefit you gain from reading these notes is... [<a class="complete-text-link" href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=4082">More</a>]</div></blockquote>]]>
  </summary>
      <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<html lang="en">
  <head>
    <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/themes/ice.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/fonts/raleway.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/core/medium.css">
  </head>
  <body>
<div class="style-controls">  <div class="page">
    <div class="page-body">
<div class="info-box-top">
<p>
Published by <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_user.php?name=marco" title="Marco von Ballmoos" class="visible">marco</a> on <span class="date-time">3. Jan 2021 17:10:45 (GMT-5)</span>
</p>
</div>
      <div class="text-flow wide">
  <blockquote class="quote abstract "><div>Disclaimer: these are notes I took while reading this book. They include citations I found interesting or enlightening or particularly well-written. In some cases, I&rsquo;ve pointed out which of these applies to which citation; in others, I have not. Any benefit you gain from reading these notes is purely incidental to the purpose they serve of reminding me what I once read. Please see Wikipedia for a summary if I&rsquo;ve failed to provide one sufficient for your purposes. If my notes serve to trigger an interest in this book, then I&rsquo;m happy for you.</div></blockquote><p>This book is nearly evenly divided between stories of how the poor in America are squeezed for all they are worth, made to pay with money and time for crimes that shouldn&rsquo;t even be crimes—or that they haven&rsquo;t even committed— while the wealthy, the elite, the so-called Masters of the Universe not only avoid punishment for much larger crimes that destroy countless lives, all in the name of consolidating filthy lucre to a self-selected elite: <span class="quote-inline">&ldquo;men and women who essentially as a matter of policy now will never see the inside of a courtroom, almost no matter what crimes they may have committed in the course of their business.&rdquo;</span></p>
<p>And let&rsquo;s all remember the huge difference: the people who steal a <em>lot</em> of money when they <em>already have</em> a lot of money are not being prosecuted. They are instead promoted to positions of power and influence. Those who have nothing and are stealing—or failing to properly report—<em>small</em> sums just in order to <em>survive</em> go to jail immediately and pay with time and money they cannot afford.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Unquestionably, however, something else is at work, something that cuts deeper into the American psyche. <strong>We have a profound hatred of the weak and the poor, and a corresponding groveling terror before the rich and successful</strong>, and we’re building a bureaucracy to match those feelings.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 117-119</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;[…] giant idiosyncratic bureaucracies that are designed to criminalize failure, poverty, and weakness on the one hand, and to immunize strength, wealth, and success on the other.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 144-146</div></div><p>This works not because those in power are exceptionally clever or better than we are. They&rsquo;re just initially luckier, be it by birth or by just dumb luck. Hard work does not necessarily get you into the special class, but any number of stupid trivialities can. They don&rsquo;t even have to be more clever than to <em>divide</em> and <em>conquer</em> (or control). They&rsquo;ve,</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;[…] arranged things so that the problem is basically invisible to most people, unless you go looking for it.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 162-163</div></div><p>This is nothing new, going back to the late 70s and early 80s—and having gotten a high-energy kick-start during Ronald Reagan&rsquo;s two terms (see <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=4138#the_reagans">my review of the 4-hour documentary <em>The Reagans</em></a> for more information).</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The cleaving of the country into two completely different states—one <strong>a small archipelago of hyperacquisitive untouchables</strong>, the other <strong>a vast ghetto of expendables with only theoretical rights</strong>—has been in the works a long time.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 13</div></div><p>Taibbi recounts the interesting mechanics of the fraud that led to the financial crash of 2008. To illustrate the &ldquo;divide&rdquo;, he juxtaposes what happened to people who orchestrated the greatest theft of all time versus people who break minor laws.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Once the bubble burst, lawsuits were filed everywhere and whistle-blowers emerged by the dozen, showing, in graphic documentary detail, how nearly every major financial company in America had chosen to participate in this enormous fraud. <strong>It was the very definition of systemic corruption, but</strong> curiously, despite what looked like mountains of evidence, <strong>almost nobody with any connection to the crisis was even threatened with criminal prosecution.</strong>&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 40</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;And as every individual who’s ever been charged with a crime knows, anyone facing criminal arrest can expect collateral consequences. <strong>A single drug <em>charge</em> can ruin a person’s chances for obtaining a student loan or a government job. It can nix his or her chances of getting housing aid or a whole range of services—even innocent members of your family may lose access to government benefits. You can lose your right to vote and your access to financial aid. You can even have your children taken away.</strong>&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 50</div></div><p>It&rsquo;s not that no-one cares, but that it seems to be unstoppable somehow.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The public defenders […] can’t do much about the convictions factory. They’re like partisans trying to slow an invasion by throwing their bodies under tank treads.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 115</div></div><p>The political will is with continuing this situation because it benefits all of the right people and doesn&rsquo;t affect anyone important, by definition. The law tiptoes around businesses and for a decent reason,</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Unless a company was corrupt through and through, it did seem reasonable to try to avoid destroying it and to protect the jobs of innocent employees if possible.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 67</div></div><p>But it got to the point where <span class="quote-inline">&ldquo;[t]he attorney general of the United States [admits] that he asks Wall Street for advice before he prosecutes Wall Street.&rdquo;</span> This was easier because the big boys could afford a lot of lawyers and put up a real fight, so <span class="quote-inline">&ldquo;[…] incompetent and lazy officials with a defense-lawyer mindset [would] avoid difficult contested trials and simply take cash up front and declare victory for the cameras.&rdquo;</span></p>
<p>On the other hand, <span class="quote-inline">&ldquo;You’ll never see a local prosecutor call a press conference and pat himself on the back for letting a car thief or a mugger of old ladies off with a fine.&rdquo;</span> Instead, police were vociferously encouraged to <em>create</em> crime on that  side of the ledger with incentives that spoke directly to their own personal gain—a nearly sure-fire method with most people, for whom principles are far down the list of priorities relative to enriching themselves.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;But the steep drop in violent crime presented police with a problem. If making arrests is the only way to advance in your career, but crime is dropping, what do you do? Furthermore, what to do if the only way to make a living wage is to rack up as much overtime as possible? In the Safir era, NYPD starting salaries were on the low end for professional police forces in America, beginning at about forty thousand dollars. How do you add hours in an era when crime is dropping?</p>
<p>&ldquo;The answer turned out to be, you simply create arrests. By multiplying marijuana arrests by a factor of ten in the space of a few years, Safir’s police force drastically increased its workload.&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 95</div></div><p>I think that the the starting pay of $40,000 as being &ldquo;too low&rdquo; is odd, though. I made less than that in 1994 when I started as a software developer. I might have been making that by 1998. We weren&rsquo;t living &ldquo;rich&rdquo;. We had no car and rented an apartment, but we were getting by without issue. I suppose a police officer isn&rsquo;t satisfied with living lower middle-class like we were and figured working overtime arresting people who hadn&rsquo;t committed crimes was an ethically defensible way of escaping that life.</p>
<p>In one case that Taibbi writes about, the main reason the state used to flush one man&rsquo;s life down the drain was that he had &ldquo;obstructed traffic&rdquo; on a sidewalk after he stepped out of a car at one in the morning to discover a cop who&rsquo;d popped up out of nowhere—on an otherwise empty sidewalk—to get between him and his own apartment&rsquo;s entrance.</p>
<p>To a normal person, this seems like the cop is obstructing the poor guy returning home from work. Since a cop can&rsquo;t be liable for something like that, it <em>must</em> be the <em>other</em> guy who committed a crime. The goal was to <em>create</em> a crime.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The obstructing traffic section is meant to apply to people who are willfully blocking cars or people on the sidewalk, or to be used as a tool for crowd control at things like protests, but in practice it’s code for being black on a Tuesday night.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 102</div></div><p>It gets more insidious, as charges are turned into convictions without sufficient proof simply by applying the punishment <em>before</em> trial.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;[…] if you don’t make bail, you’ll almost automatically spend at least [15-90 days] in jail waiting for trial. The state knows this, so essentially, charging a person who can’t make bail with a B misdemeanor is the same as convicting that person. You file the charge, the judge sets high bail, you go back inside, and then you eventually plead to time served, because, well, why not? You’ve already done the time.</p>
<p>&ldquo;The only difference is, you’ve got a conviction now, which means the next time you get arrested, the denial of bail—or a punishingly high bail—will be even more automatic.&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 117</div></div><p>Innocent people end up with criminal records because <span class="quote-inline">&ldquo;[…] the speedy trial concept […] is easily reduced to a complete joke.&rdquo;</span> and the system <span class="quote-inline">&ldquo;applies disproportionate punishment to the guilty.&rdquo;</span> Remember that, with the successful division of America, people aren&rsquo;t even aware that this is the system. They don&rsquo;t know that <span class="quote-inline">&ldquo;failure to follow a police order, no matter how stupid or unreasonable, is cause for an arrest or a summons.&rdquo;</span> Combine that with the foot-dragging above, and a <span class="quote-inline">&ldquo;prosecutor can essentially turn any misdemeanor case against almost anyone into a de facto conviction […]&rdquo;</span> That <span class="quote-inline">&ldquo;[…] puts an entire segment of the population constantly on the defensive, gives it a criminal record essentially in advance.&rdquo;</span></p>
<p>Taibbi now moves on to contrast that system with what happens when Dick Fuld and Lehman Brothers steal and waste a truly tremendous amount of money. Unlike with poor people, where petty, mostly victimless crime is manufactured, in this case large-scale theft from thousands—if not hundreds of thousands—of victims is completely ignored, letting the criminals steal more and more from more and more victims until the criminal finally stops on their own when the system—rather than the regulators—decide that enough&rsquo;s enough.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;What’s amazing about this is that the Fed saw fit as early as January 2008 to warn Chase about Lehman’s instability. But nobody ever warned the public. Nobody stepped in after the bank cooked its books in Repo 105, or misreported taxes, or made fake disclosures, or lied outright to investors. Nothing was done. The government merely sat back and watched the catastrophe unfold, allowing new victims to pour money into the walking-dead bank right up until its collapse.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 152</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The deals the government and Wall Street worked out that weekend […] transform[ed] America into a permanent oligarchical bailout state. <strong>This was, essentially, a formal merger of Wall Street and the U.S. government.</strong>&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 156</div></div><p>Barclays stepped in to &ldquo;bail out&rdquo; Lehmen Brothers for what they claimed was &ldquo;cost&rdquo; but ended up skimming $5B from the top, <em>stealing</em> it from the owners of Lehman Brothers, who were <em>already</em> being screwed from the original mismanagement. Now, Barclays was stealing even more money from them, all with the oversight and blessing of the government. Instead of a candy bar from a bodega, it was $5B from retirement accounts.</p>
<p>Next, Taibbi takes us to Georgia, where we learn how the police milk the local immigrant population by inventing crimes to produce fines and settlements to bolster the local tax base.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The squad cars perch on the sides of the road like ticks on a vein, hauling in alien after undocumented alien and tossing them into the criminal justice/deportation hopper. From there, in a complex, arbitrary, and mindlessly cruel legal process that puts people literally in chains for the crime of going to work or taking their kids to school, the detainees get ground up into a rich financial and political meal, shared in nearly equal parts by state and federal authorities on the one hand and private prison companies on the other.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 201</div></div><p>Because of the residency status of these people, they are de-facto afforded fewer rights. This amounts to conditional rights, depending on how much money you have.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;For a country founded on the idea that rights are inalienable and inherent from birth, <strong>we’ve developed a high tolerance for conditional rights and conditional citizenship.</strong> And the one condition, it turns out, is money. If you have a lot of it, the legal road you get to travel is well lit and beautifully maintained. If you don’t, it’s a dark alley and most Americans would be shocked to find out what’s at the end of it.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 208</div></div><p>It is about money, and it&rsquo;s definitely a class thing, but how can we do this to fellow human beings, just because they don&rsquo;t have that much money? That, alone, wouldn&rsquo;t be enough, which is why we mix in race-based alienation to make <em>everything OK</em></p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;This seemed to represent the ultimate white-folks win-win: local chicken-plant owners got to keep their cheap labor, while local police still got to milk the immigrant community for any money they made working at those plants.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 229</div></div><p>On the other side of the ledger, if you&rsquo;re rich and white, you can run a scam for 13 years and nothing happens until the scam collapses under its own weight (pretty much how Lehman brothers did).</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Madoff actually went more than thirteen years without making a single stock purchase and yet somehow survived several SEC investigations […]&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 256</div></div><p>So there&rsquo;s Madoff, who scams millions, if not billions, out of other rich people by <em>not</em> making trades. And then there are the guys who coordinate to generate artificial trades—and interest—to drive a stock price up so they can sell at that artificially inflated rate.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;To <a href="https://www.investopedia.com/terms/p/paintingthetape.asp">paint the tape</a> on ADM, Graber and Israel would call eight different brokers and put in buy orders simultaneously to run up the price—at a time when Graber was holding lots of the stock ready to sell into a rising market. It was a racket the Securities and Exchange Commission was hopelessly ill-equipped to stop.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 257</div></div><p>In case it wasn&rsquo;t clear how that worked: this in insider trading. The hedge funds have prior access to information that no-one else in the market has access to, simply because they pay the analysts more for it.</p>
<p>Everyone else gets screwed in a market that ends up reflecting only the interests of the already ultra-rich. And these people are just getting richer because they&rsquo;re already rich and stealing from others. They&rsquo;re worth billions and stealing <em>more</em> from those who have, relatively, nothing to give. Where that should be a <em>greater</em> crime because it&rsquo;s more morally bankrupt than stealing to buy food, <em>this</em> is the crime that goes unpunished.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Tipping off a hedge fund that your analyst is going to give a “buy” rating to a stock weeks before that research is made public can be enormously valuable to the hedge fund, for the obvious reason that the fund now has a pretty good idea of a concrete date and time when the stock is going to tick upward.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 267</div></div><p>It&rsquo;s essentially like when Biff had that almanac of sports facts when he traveled back in time in <em>Back to the Future II</em>. Hedge-fund traders know the future and are no longer taking any risk. No-one else in the market has access to this information and, mysteriously, they don&rsquo;t seem to do as well as these hedge funds.</p>
<p>Next, Taibbi tells the story of a how a cabal of these hedge-fund traders convinced themselves to go short on a Canadian company (they were gambling that the value of the company would go down by a certain date). When they realized they were wrong, instead of eating their losses—as the rest of us would—they instead employed clumsy, quasi-Mafia tactics to try to force the company to lose value.</p>
<p>This is the alternative to predicting the future. If, for whatever reason, you still guessed incorrectly (or the information you stole turns out to not be reliable), then you can still commit <em>other</em> crimes try to <em>change</em> the future so your bet <em>still</em> pays off. Naturally, since you&rsquo;re rich, none of these things count as crimes.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;[…] in a city where police in some neighborhoods define crime as standing on the sidewalk the wrong way, these idiots took their stock-trading act-like-a-thug life, screwed it up a hundred different ways, and not only couldn’t get arrested, they couldn’t even get police of any kind to notice.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 275</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Twenty-six billion dollars of fraud: no felony cases. But when the stakes are in the hundreds of dollars, we kick in 26,000 doors a year, in just one county.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 323</div></div><p>It seems the police just weren&rsquo;t looking for crime where they knew it wouldn&rsquo;t be (i.e. they weren&rsquo;t manufacturing it there). And this isn&rsquo;t just grossly unfair, but the larger, ignored crime has a <em>ton</em> of collateral damage, in the form of investors (often pension and index funds and 401K mutual funds) who lost money on completely fictitious and artificially generated market movement. </p>
<p>There was no actual economic benefit—the common defense the finance industry has for itself—because <span class="quote-inline">&ldquo;[t]he entire thing was a battle of public relations. It had nothing to do with real economics.&rdquo;</span> Anyone who claims that the free market is doing its job of &ldquo;price finding&rdquo; is either a fool or a liar.</p>
<p>This is a system with two, quasi-official sets of rights.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Over and over again, we hear that if you owe money in a certain way, or if you receive a certain kind of public assistance, you forfeit this or that line item in the Bill of Rights. If you’re a person of means, you get full service for all ten amendments, and even a few that aren’t listed. But if you owe, if you rent, you get a slightly thinner, more tubercular version of the Fourth Amendment, the First Amendment, the Fifth and Sixth Amendments, and so on.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 319</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;As Americans, we’re all beginning to develop a second sense about who gets to feel the business end of the criminal justice system, and when, and who doesn’t, and why. <strong>That second sense</strong> we all carry around in our minds <strong>is our true government.</strong> […] Schoolhouse Rock! teaches us that everyone is treated equally under the law […] but at the same time we somehow know not to be surprised when that turns out not to be completely true.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 321</div></div><p>It&rsquo;s more about class than race. The line is drawn between the reprehensible, mooching poor and the deserving, job-creating wealthy. </p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;It’s not that it’s written anywhere that if you’re black and you live in the projects, you don’t get protection against illegal searches—it just sort of works out that way. And if this makes any sense at all, it’s not about skin color. This is a cultural kind of bias. White people who live the wrong way get caught in the net, too.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 319</div></div><p>Hatred of the poor is more deeply embedded and unchangeable than racism. Racism has actually decreased over the years. It&rsquo;s obviously still a problem, but it&rsquo;s much better than it was—albeit because it was so appallingly bad before—whereas inequality has <em>increased</em> dramatically. Middle-class blacks are just as disdainful of poor blacks as middle-class whites are (do you remember when Chris Rock had a long bit about <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Niggas_vs._Black_People&#039;">Niggas vs. Black People</a> in <em>Bring the Pain</em>?)</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;[This system] attacks people without money, particularly nonwhite people, with a weirdly venomous kind of hatred, treating them like they’re already guilty of something, which of course they are—namely, being that which we’re all afraid of becoming.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 324</div></div><p>Almost as strong as hatred of the poor is reverence for the rich, something I haven&rsquo;t noticed in any other country. It&rsquo;s deep-down, bone-stupid to revere the rich, sucking up their fairy tales about how they got to be that way and you didn&rsquo;t. As Taibbi puts in, hand in hand, these</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;[…] twin impulses […] drive modern America: burning hatred of all losers and the poor, and breathless, abject worship of the rich, even the talentless and undeserving rich.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 324</div></div><p>You don&rsquo;t need to be smart or good or anything commendable to get into the privileged club. You just have to somehow have a lot of money: inherit it, steal it, it doesn&rsquo;t matter. Once you have it, you&rsquo;re protected. Go big or go home…or to jail. If you commit crimes <em>while</em> you&rsquo;re big, though…you just add to your fortune, but don&rsquo;t have to worry about going to jail. You have to worry about the size of your fan club growing too big.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;These bureaucracies accomplish just two things: they make small piles of money smaller and big piles of money bigger.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 326</div></div><p>Taibbi tells the story of Marishka, a young woman—one who&rsquo;s made mistakes, yes—trying to make ends meet. Does she get even a real first chance, to say nothing of a second one? No. She&rsquo;s not rich. Instead,</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;[…] she was about to become more heavily scrutinized by the state than any twelve Wall Street bankers put together.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 333</div></div><p>Helping her would cost nearly nothing and could help her a lot. Helping hedge-fund brokers steal billions costs a tremendous amount and helps only a small group of thieves who already had more money than they knew what to do with in the first place. But we are trained to believe that Marishka is guilty until proven innocent and that the hedge-fund trader doesn&rsquo;t even exist.</p>
<p>Taibbi has a way of presenting the facts in a way that shows the glaring irony of this two-class system.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;For instance, in 2011, the state of Ohio—the same state that lost tens of millions in the early 2000s when its pension fund bought severely overpriced mortgage-backed securities from a Lehman Brothers banker named John Kasich, who would later become governor—tried to recoup some of its losses by sending out 22,000 notices to Ohioans seeking “overpayments” in either welfare or food stamps.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 341</div></div><p>In other words, Ohio elected the guy whose company bilked its state-pension fund out of <span class="quote-inline">&ldquo;tens of millions&rdquo;</span> to be <em>its governor</em> while it scrambled to bolster its budget by scrabbling back amounts in the tens to hundreds of dollars for what it called <span class="quote-inline">&ldquo;overpayments&rdquo;</span> (a claim that, in many cases, was highly dubious) from <em>welfare recipients</em>. Because the rich are unassailable, we attack the poor. Not only are the rich unassailable, they are <em>rewarded</em> with <em>governerships</em>.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;[…] the only offenders the local burghers will spend money to embarrass publicly are young, single, nonwhite mothers guilty of the [alleged] crime of improperly receiving benefits.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 349</div></div><p>This was not just a Reagan or Bush thing. This was also a Clinton and Obama thing. This is an American Ruling Class thing.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Bill Clinton’s political formula for seizing the presidency was simple. He made money tight in the ghettos and let it flow free on Wall Street. He showered the projects with cops and bean counters and pulled the cops off the beat in the financial services sector. And in one place he created vast new mountain ranges of paperwork, while in another, paperwork simply vanished.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 351</div></div><p>It is the way that they keep themselves as the ruling class. For 99% of the participants, there is no discernible difference from a monarchy. There is no underlying principle except for the rich to get much richer and the poor to feel guilty about not being richer, all the while being milked <em>every damned day</em>. A self-selected and smug minority can&rsquo;t fail, while everyone else can do nothing <em>but</em> fail. It&rsquo;s no wonder people are angry, but their anger is wildly misdirected.</p>
<p>This is the American Myth. It is a palace of lies built by many, but benefitting only a few. Many that support it would probably do at least as well or even better under a fairer, more just, more moral, and more principled system, but they&rsquo;re terrified of changing horses and falling into the giant crack of poverty they&rsquo;ve created.</p>
<p>They won&rsquo;t rock the boat for a <em>principle</em>, for fear that they&rsquo;ll lose the unearned gains they&rsquo;ve accrued—and continue to accrue—from the unprincipled system that they do support. So they hear, believe, and repeat to themselves the stories that the losers in this system deserve what they get—just as the winners do. To admit anything else would lead to a psychic collapse. <a href="https://youtu.be/VImnpErdDzA">Are We the Baddies?</a></p>
<p>One of the big problems is that hating a poor person for not reporting they got an extra $25 of benefits per week is somehow easy. At any rate, it&rsquo;s easy to understand what they&rsquo;re being accused of—and feeling righteous about it.</p>
<p>Hating a bank for setting up laws that put its president in charge of bailouts to <em>his own bank</em> at a federal organization, effective loaning himself billions in government money at 0% interest to buy out competitors at bargain-basement prices, prices that were artificially depressed by a collapsed bubble that he and his bank created is … somehow more difficult to understand.</p>
<p>Taibbi provides the details below:</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;[…] WaMu and its $307 billion in assets were delivered by the state into the hands of Chase and its CEO, Jamie Dimon, for the preposterously low price of $1.9 billion, a bargain deal that was struck just a few weeks before Chase was given $25 billion in cash by the government as part of the TARP bailouts. This was Chase’s second sweetheart deal in less than a year.</p>
<p>&ldquo;Six months before, in March 2008, Chase had “rescued” the imploding investment banking giant Bear Stearns, buying the venerable firm with the aid of $29 billion in guarantees extended by the New York branch of the Federal Reserve—whose chairman of the board of directors at the time was, get this, JPMorgan Chase CEO Jamie Dimon.</p>
<p>&ldquo;That means that six months after Jamie Dimon was the lucky recipient of his own Federal Reserve bailout in order to acquire Bear Stearns, his bank was given another $25 billion in cash by the state to go on another shopping spree, cash he used, among other things, to buy Washington Mutual.&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 359</div></div><p>You see? It&rsquo;s so complicated that the average mortal will doubt their ability to judge whether something shady happened or not. But it&rsquo;s <em>brainwashing</em>. They&rsquo;ve brainwashed you into believing that you are completely able to judge the indigent—without needing any background information, which is almost always morally, if not legally, exonerating—but are utterly incapable of judging financial malfeasance and fraud several orders of magnitude larger and more damaging, even when it stinks to high heaven.</p>
<p>In the first case, we <em>know</em> they&rsquo;re guilty because we can judge <em>downwards</em>, but in the second, we <em>defer</em> to the criminals, who we assume are just much smarter than us. We are jealous of their success and attribute it to their being superior—else we&rsquo;d have to think we were somehow inferior or had been suckered in some way. If they don&rsquo;t do too much damage to us personally, we let it slide, rather than examine that whole house of psychological cards.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The crucial thing to understand is that if businesses like consumer credit cards are going to give cards away in the mail to everyone with a pulse, then the process almost by definition has to involve fraud.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 383</div></div><p>Why doesn&rsquo;t our bullshit detector go off for this stuff? We take to the streets to protest COVID, we believe the Earth is flat, that the towers were taken down by the Bush administration, that Russia stole the election—we fight like mad for stupid, unsubstantiated shit <em>that doesn&rsquo;t even affect us</em> (not really), but then don&rsquo;t trust ourselves to say anything when someone is blowing smoke up our collective asses in <em>to steal everything we have</em>?</p>
<p>This leads to people like Obama telling us with a straight face that <em>nothing actually illegal happened</em>, that <span class="quote-inline">&ldquo;Banks are in the business of making money […a]nd they find loopholes.&rdquo;</span>, which is <em>bullshit</em>. They break laws that are unenforced. They <em>undo</em> laws that they don&rsquo;t like. They <em>illegally</em> bribe legislators to add loopholes for themselves before <em>driving through them</em>.</p>
<p>They are the kids on the playground who change the rules mid-game, then declare victory <em>and we believe them</em>. Not only that: <em>we worship them</em>.</p>
<p>The final financial sector volume deals with a woman whose job was to sniff out credit-card fraud. She found it in her own bank, blew the whistle, and was fired for it. The transactions all proceeded unfettered. All of it was vastly illegal—fraud of the highest order—with several layers of beneficiaries all sucking illegal gains out of a helpless target, already mired in poverty and debt.</p>
<p>This is a &ldquo;market&rdquo; built on obvious subterfuges intended to generate predictable outcomes and revenue.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;[…] in a huge percentage of credit card cases, the cardholder never even sees the summons and consequently never appears in court to defend himself.</p>
<p>&ldquo;[…] the bulk of the credit card collection business is conducted without any supporting documentation showing up or being seen by human eyes at any part of the process. The meat of the business is collecting unopposed default judgments from defendants who either never receive a summons or receive one and never appear in court.</p>
<p>&ldquo;[…] At no time in the process do most collectors ever actually need to produce evidence of a legitimate debt or a legitimate judgment.&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 374–376</div></div><p>What&rsquo;s stopping them from making them up wholesale? You wouldn&rsquo;t be able to tell the difference. If no-one checks, then you don&rsquo;t serve and just make up a number for a nonexistent card and garnish their wages after judgment. Why even buy accounts from Chase? You don&rsquo;t need them for this scam.</p>
<p>This is largely how it works, although they do seem try to get actual outstanding debts—which is not that hard to do in 21-century America. Once they&rsquo;ve obtained a judgment against a wholly unaware victim without ever having shown any evidence, they then leverage other laws they&rsquo;ve engineered that let them garnish wages in most states.</p>
<p>The company doing the garnishing almost never has anything to do with the company to which that person actually owes money. You borrow from A and B ends up garnishing your wages with no accountability or evidence and nothing other than a court proceeding with a default judgment in favor of the plaintiff because the defendant was never aware that it had even occurred. The first they know about it is when the notice a line item on their paycheck. This is a business model that actually exists—but only affects people you&rsquo;ve never met, so it&rsquo;s OK.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;What this means is that the entire business model for something like Chase’s credit card business is not much more than a gigantic welfare fraud scheme. These companies borrow hundreds of billions of dollars from the Fed at rock-bottom rates, then turn around and lend it out to the world at 5, 10, 15, 20 percent, as credit cards and mortgages, boat loans and aircraft loans, and so on.</p>
<p>&ldquo;If you pay it back, great, it’s a 500 percent or 1,000 percent or 4,000 percent profit for the bank. If you don’t pay it back, the company can put your name in the hopper to be sued. A $5,000 debt on a credit card for the now-defunct Circuit City, which was actually a Chase card, became a $13,000 or $14,000 debt by the time the bank finished applying fees and penalties.&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 382</div></div><p>Banks profiting from fraud perpetrated on welfare recipients is a direct relationship across the &ldquo;divide&rdquo; described in the book&rsquo;s title. It really pulls everything together.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;When the state brings a fraud case against a welfare mom, it brings it with disgust, with rage, because in addition to committing the legal crime, <strong>she’s committed the political crime of being needy and an eyesore.</strong> Banks commit the legal crime of fraud wholesale; […] But they’re not charged, because there’s no political crime. <strong>The system is not disgusted by the organized, mechanized search for profit. It’s more like it’s impressed by it.</strong>&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 383</div></div><p>And thing to remember is that, while the bank has <span class="quote-inline">&ldquo;entire departments committed to [fraud]&rdquo;</span>, the individual often <em>doesn&rsquo;t commit a crime at all</em>, as Taibbi repeatedly pointed out throughout the book. The welfare cheating is sometimes or even often just clerical errors. Credit card debt is active fraud.</p>
<p>Instead of prosecuting giant crimes by unacceptable perpetrators, they&rsquo;re inventing and then prosecuting smaller ones, on victims who&rsquo;ve been made politically acceptable by brainwashing campaigns sponsored by the perpetrators of the fraud. They teach us to hate the poor (and ourselves) and revere the rich (them), then make themselves richer than the obscenely rich that they already are, while we cheer them on as they rob our comrades and neighbors.</p>
<p>That this is how it&rsquo;s ended up bespeaks a corruption, a failure at the institutional level on a grand scale. If the government <em>chooses</em> to avoid prosecutions in favor of a non-controlling financial settlement, then that amounts to <em>the government getting a cut of the action.</em> This is the established model now. Fool me once, shame on you; fool me twice, shame on me. The banks will do it again and the government will get its fee.</p>
<p>This drives a conveyor belt of lucre from a permanent impoverished underclass to increasingly unassailable royalty. That&rsquo;s a business relationship or I can&rsquo;t tell the difference.</p>
<h2>Citations</h2><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Of course, on the other end of the spectrum are the titans of business, the top executives at companies like Goldman and Chase and GlaxoSmithKline, <strong>men and women who essentially as a matter of policy now will never see the inside of a courtroom, almost no matter what crimes they may have committed in the course of their business.</strong> This is obviously an outrage, and the few Americans who paid close attention to news stories like the deferred prosecution of HSBC for laundering drug money, or the nonprosecution of the Swiss bank UBS for fixing interest rates, were beside themselves with anger over the unfairness of it all.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 97-101</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Unquestionably, however, something else is at work, something that cuts deeper into the American psyche. We have a profound hatred of the weak and the poor, and a corresponding groveling terror before the rich and successful, and we’re building a bureaucracy to match those feelings.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 117-119</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;[…] the common justification for the failure to prosecute executives in corrupt corporations for any crimes that they might commit is that <strong>their offenses aren’t really crimes per se but mere ethical violations, morally unfortunate acts not punishable by law.</strong> President Obama himself would hint at this in an infamous 60 Minutes interview.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 127-129</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;It’s come around to that point of view at the end of a long evolutionary process, in which the rule of law has slowly been replaced by <strong>giant idiosyncratic bureaucracies that are designed to criminalize failure, poverty, and weakness on the one hand, and to immunize strength, wealth, and success on the other.</strong>&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 144-146</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;If you grew up well off, you probably don’t know how easy it is for poor people to end up in jail, often for the same dumb things you yourself did as a kid.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 158-160</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;This is a story that doesn’t need to be argued. You just need to see it, and it speaks for itself. Only <strong>we’ve arranged things so that the problem is basically invisible to most people, unless you go looking for it.</strong>&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 162-163</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;We’re creating a dystopia, where the mania of the state isn’t secrecy or censorship but unfairness. Obsessed with success and wealth and despising failure and poverty, our society is systematically dividing the population into winners and losers, using institutions like the courts to speed the process.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 12</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The cleaving of the country into two completely different states—one a small archipelago of hyperacquisitive untouchables, the other a vast ghetto of expendables with only theoretical rights—has been in the works a long time.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 13</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;There were also horrific regulatory surrenders like the Securities and Exchange Commission’s 2004 decision to lower capital reserve standards for the top five investment banks, <strong>a move that eventually helped three of those banks (Merrill Lynch, Bear Stearns, and Lehman Brothers) to borrow themselves out of existence.</strong>&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 19</div></div><p>Love that expression.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Here was a major company, an employer of thousands, using its innocent employees as a kind of human shield in a desperate last-ditch attempt to stave off a criminal prosecution. It was a high-stakes stare-down in which Andersen’s lawyers all but dared the government to pull a My Lai and machine-gun its innocent employees into a ditch.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 21</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Such flip-flops are so common among this type of lawyer that most finance-sector observers scarcely even raise an eyebrow at them. <strong>“You’ll have a guy who as a prosecutor was tossing everyone in jail,” laughs one Wall Street reporter, “and six months later he’s a partner at some firm, and it’s almost like he thinks insider trading should be legal.”</strong>&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 27</div></div><p>The definition of amorality is not having any principles.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;A key feature of the Spitzer settlement was the way the evidence was laid out openly so that the public could see the companies’ internal communications. At Lehman Brothers, for example, analysts admitted to giving cushy ratings to companies in exchange for more investment banking business, not caring if ordinary investors who were not in on the game got screwed.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 28</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;These agreements sometimes have a less adversarial feel than the cops-and-robbers approaches of Spitzer, Robert Morgenthau, and the S&amp;L prosecutors. They often read like <strong>agreements hashed out in friendly meetings by like-minded legal colleagues from similar cultural backgrounds</strong>, which is often exactly what they are.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 29</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Breuer announced a plan to revamp the Justice Department’s Criminal Division’s Fraud Section, whose chief failing seems to have been that it had been created during the Bush administration. In fact, the Fraud Section had been productive during the Bush years, expanding its footprint in several areas that had been overlooked, from securities fraud to violations of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act to corporate accounting cases from the Enron era. Health care fraud prosecutions had gone from basically nil—fraudsters stole from Medicare wantonly in the 1990s—to thriving, reportedly saving more than $7 billion.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 35</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;By Barack Obama’s second term, it was clear to most rational observers of the financial sector that the crash of four years before hadn’t been some kind of accidental market screw-up—not a “thousand-year flood,” as some pundits first called it. Instead, it had been a widespread crisis of institutional policy. And a core part of this policy, it turned out, was crime.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 38</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;They used a technique called securitization that allowed banks and mortgage lenders to take vast pools of home loans belonging to underemployed janitors and immigrants and magically convert them into investments that were ostensibly as safe as Microsoft corporate bonds or the sovereign debt of Luxembourg, but more lucrative than either.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 39</div></div><p>Naked fraud, let&rsquo;s not forget.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Once the bubble burst, lawsuits were filed everywhere and whistle-blowers emerged by the dozen, showing, in graphic documentary detail, how nearly every major financial company in America had chosen to participate in this enormous fraud. <strong>It was the very definition of systemic corruption, but</strong> curiously, despite what looked like mountains of evidence, <strong>almost nobody with any connection to the crisis was even threatened with criminal prosecution.</strong>&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 40</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Once the sixth-largest bank in America, <strong>WaMu</strong> was selling $29 billion worth of subprime loans every year during the height of the crisis. After its collapse, investigators from the Senate’s Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations uncovered evidence that the bank had conducted its own internal investigations into the mortgage markets as early as the mid-2000s, and had <strong>found fraud in as many as 83 percent of the loans produced by some of its own regional offices. Yet the bank did not alert regulators, did nothing to stop the fraud, and continued to sell billions in subprime for years.</strong>&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 40</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Under “Hustle,” Bank of America intentionally removed underwriters and compliance officers from the loan origination process, explicitly aiming to make sure that loans “moved forward, never backward.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 40</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;And as every individual who’s ever been charged with a crime knows, anyone facing criminal arrest can expect collateral consequences. <strong>A single drug <em>charge</em> can ruin a person’s chances for obtaining a student loan or a government job. It can nix his or her chances of getting housing aid or a whole range of services—even innocent members of your family may lose access to government benefits. You can lose your right to vote and your access to financial aid. You can even have your children taken away.</strong></p>
<p>&ldquo;But no police anywhere were officially asked to weigh the collateral consequences of arrests for prostitution, stealing cars, assault, selling weed, jumping turnstiles, even the simple offense of being homeless. There’s no memo in the Justice Department that wonders aloud what happens to the families of those sorts of arrestees. Instead, the new trend in policing is and has been to aggressively no longer care about any of it.&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 50</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;They stopped him, asked him for ID, searched him, no probable cause other than that he looked dirty and high. Classic use of New York’s stop-and-frisk program, with Tory being white the only thing weird about it.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 56</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;In 2011, the year before Tory got arrested, another year when exactly nobody on Wall Street was arrested for crimes connected to the financial crisis, New York City police stopped and searched a record 684,724 people. Out of those, 88 percent were black or Hispanic.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 57</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Or sometimes, like in Tory’s case, you get your pockets emptied and suddenly you’re standing there on the corner of Eighth Avenue and Twenty-First Street with half a joint sitting in your open hand. Now that’s not “private use” anymore. Now you’re “knowingly or unlawfully possessing marijuana and such is burning or open in public view.” Now you’ve got a chargeable offense and your arresting officer gets to make his summons pad one sheet thinner.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 57</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The point is, Tory Marone went from privately having a joint in his pocket to publicly waving it around on Twenty-First Street with the help of one of New York’s finest, and he went off to jail once again.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 57</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;“This is a corporate flack who was such a zero, you had twenty-five-year-olds in Congress who wouldn’t return his phone calls,” recalls one. “And suddenly we all look up, and he’s head of the Criminal Division of the Justice Department. We’re all like, ‘How did that happen?’&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 60</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;“I don’t think the banks got off easy,” he said, adding, “We’ve held them very much accountable. I’m not sure you can find a more robust resolution.” But Breuer was standing less than a mile from a homeless drifter who at that very minute was getting a “more robust solution” for having half a joint in his pocket.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 62</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Even high-ranking former prosecutors were appalled. “The message this is sending is if you want to engage in money laundering, make sure you’re doing it within the context of your employment at a bank,” former assistant attorney general Jimmy Gurulé said. “And don’t go small. Do it on a very large scale, and you won’t get prosecuted.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 63</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The anger and resentment of federal investigators toward greedy corporate criminals who inexplicably stole money when they were already rich—the anger that bled through in scenes like the Adelphia perp walk in the early Bush years—that was a thing of the past.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 64</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The attorney general of the United States had just admitted, in front of a room full of reporters, that he asks Wall Street for advice before he prosecutes Wall Street.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 67</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;In a way, the original Holder memo had some sense to it. Unless a company was corrupt through and through, it did seem reasonable to try to avoid destroying it and to protect the jobs of innocent employees if possible. This was certainly an appropriate area to think about using prosecutorial discretion.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 67</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Even Barron’s was appalled. “The nation’s chief law-enforcement official admitted the decision to prosecute depends not on the law, but the impact on the financial markets,” wrote columnist Randall Forsyth.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 69</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;But Holder’s testimony had at least ended the mystery. It was obvious now that the once-modest selective-leniency idea that he had cooked up in 1999 had grown exponentially and was now loosed from its cage, running wild in American society like a strung-out lab animal, wrecking things and mutating by the minute. <strong>It had gone from a simple tool to save a few jobs to a magical thing that was enabling the transformation of the world’s biggest banks into bona fide organized crime operations, companies that had now gone far beyond shredding a few documents and were engaged in everything from rigging energy prices to manipulating interest rates to drug trafficking.</strong>&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 70</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The attorney general of the United States was saying that the economy had grown so complicated that his own office was now and henceforth helpless to decide on its own when it was okay to prosecute, that <strong>before it moved against any high-powered target, it needed to ask the “experts” on Wall Street if the economy would survive such an action.</strong>&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 71</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Minus any effort to make the companies safer for prosecution, Collateral Consequences appeared far more likely to be what some line prosecutors believed it to be—<strong>an excuse that allowed incompetent and lazy officials with a defense-lawyer mindset to avoid difficult contested trials and simply take cash up front and declare victory for the cameras.</strong> None of the settlements proposed anything like breaking up the companies, or even hinted at a thwarted desire to bring white-collar offenders to trial.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 71</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;In a case like that, where the fine is insignificant compared to the company’s revenue, <strong>the settlement</strong> is almost an antideterrent. It <strong>just helps set the price for getting caught, and it makes the cost-benefit analysis for criminal behavior simpler.</strong>&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 79</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The street criminal is hated, despised. It’s understood that sending him anywhere but to jail is grounds for public outrage. You’ll never see a local prosecutor call a press conference and pat himself on the back for letting a car thief or a mugger of old ladies off with a fine.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 80</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Nowhere did it indicate any regret or apology to the public that no individual would have to face any penalty for what prosecutors themselves were describing as an “astonishing” record of dysfunction and “stunning” failures of oversight. Indeed, everybody seemed pleased as punch with the result.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 80</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;It’s a particular feature of modern American government officials, particularly Democratic Party types, that they often expect the press and the public to give them credit for their unspoken excuses. They’ll vote yea on the Iraq war and the Patriot Act and nay for a public option or an end to torture or a bill to break up the banks. Then they’ll cozy up to you privately and whisper that of course they’re with you in spirit on those issues, but politically it just wasn’t possible to vote that way.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 81</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;And then at trial, you might find out that some reputable firm like Ernst &amp; Young or even, perhaps, an actual federal regulator knew about and okayed your target’s conduct all along and did so on paper. This is something you don’t often have to worry about with a Lincoln Park gangster—a permission slip to deal coke from the local precinct captain.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 81</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;What’s happened now, in this new era of settlements and nonprosecutions, is that the state has formally surrendered to its own excuses. It has decided just to punt from the start and take the money, which doesn’t become really wrong until it turns around the next day and decides to double down on the less-defended, flooring it all the way to trial against a welfare mom or some joker who sold a brick of dope in the projects.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 81</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;[…] it’s the jurisprudential version of Pravda, where the facts in the paper might have all been true on any given day, but the lie was all in what was not said.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 84</div></div><p>That&rsquo;s the mainstream media too. But he knows that. Still, the example of Pravda seemed a bit out of place.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;[…] the two approaches to justice may individually make a kind of sense, but side by side they’re a dystopia, where common city courts become factories for turning poor people into prisoners, while federal prosecutors on the white-collar beat turn into overpriced garbage men, who behind closed doors quietly dispose of the sins of the rich for a fee.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 84</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Curiously, for instance, the drop in violent crime is most pronounced in cities with high immigrant populations.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 94</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;But the steep drop in violent crime presented police with a problem. If making arrests is the only way to advance in your career, but crime is dropping, what do you do? Furthermore, what to do if the only way to make a living wage is to rack up as much overtime as possible? In the Safir era, NYPD starting salaries were on the low end for professional police forces in America, beginning at about forty thousand dollars. How do you add hours in an era when crime is dropping?</p>
<p>&ldquo;The answer turned out to be, you simply create arrests. By multiplying marijuana arrests by a factor of ten in the space of a few years, Safir’s police force drastically increased its workload.&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 95</div></div><p>I made less than that in 1994. Might have been making that by 1998.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Here again you get into the weird nature of this new policing system. The police in this case actually wanted to send Andrew home. Their strategy is to roust up everybody, search them for guns or drugs, run their names for warrants. If you get a hit, great. Finding guns, making arrests, and writing summonses is what turns line patrolmen into sergeants and lieutenants. But if you don’t find anything, well then, you’ve just brutalized some guy walking home, for no reason at all, and the last thing you want is a paper trail. So better just to let the guy go, hope the situation goes away.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 102</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The obstructing traffic section is meant to apply to people who are willfully blocking cars or people on the sidewalk, or to be used as a tool for crowd control at things like protests, but in practice it’s code for being black on a Tuesday night.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 102</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>He fingered my business card, stared at it.</p>
<p>“What exactly are you doing here again?”</p>
<p>“I’m writing a book,” I said. “It’s about the criminal justice system. Among other things, about cases like this.”</p>
<p>“But what about a case like this could possibly be the subject of a book?” he asked.</p>
<p>“Well,” I said, “we just watched, in court, a policeman admitting to falsely arresting someone. You don’t find that interesting?”</p>
<p>He shrugged.</p>
<p>“Also,” I said, “have you ever heard of a white person being arrested for obstructing pedestrian traffic?”</p>
<p>“Well, white people don’t live in those neighborhoods,” he said.</p>
<p>“But white people live somewhere,” I said. “And nobody arrests them for obstructing pedestrian traffic.”</p>
<p>“That’s because that’s not where the crime is. The crime is out there.”</p>
<p>He jerked a thumb in the direction of Brooklyn.</p>
<p>“Low-class people,” he said, “do low-class things.”</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 114</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The defendant’s court-appointed attorney is an attractive, idealistic young white woman with shoulder-length brown hair and a long skirt who looks like she should be an academic, a sociologist maybe. The public defenders in these higher courts are almost all workaholic do-gooders, passionate and almost unreasonably committed to their jobs. On the macro level, they can’t do much about the convictions factory. They’re like partisans trying to slow an invasion by throwing their bodies under tank treads.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 115</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The complaint says an undercover officer—a UC—offered the woman twenty dollars for a sexual act outside a park somewhere north of three in the morning, and the defendant accepted. Why we’re paying detectives to offer people twenty bucks for sexual acts in parks after three in the morning is a question nobody’s much interested in answering at that moment.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 115</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;Lawyers in this courthouse have yet another saying: “If you go in, you stay in. If you get out, you stay out.” If you get arrested for a B misdemeanor in New York City—let’s say it’s prostitution—you might face a punishment of fifteen to ninety days. But if you don’t make bail, you’ll almost automatically spend at least that long in jail waiting for trial. The state knows this, so essentially, charging a person who can’t make bail with a B misdemeanor is the same as convicting that person. You file the charge, the judge sets high bail, you go back inside, and then you eventually plead to time served, because, well, why not? You’ve already done the time.</p>
<p>&ldquo;The only difference is, you’ve got a conviction now, which means the next time you get arrested, the denial of bail—or a punishingly high bail—will be even more automatic.&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 117</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;So if you’re a prostitute with no fixed address and a long criminal history hauled in during the wee hours of a Tuesday morning for accepting some undercover cop’s sting offer of twenty bucks for a sex act outside a park, you’re pretty much automatically looking at two weeks to three months in jail, plus a two-hundred-dollar fine (“That’s like ten blowjobs,” comments one public defender righteously) from the moment the city decides to file the charge. And even in the relatively rare instance where God smiles upon you and sends an undercover officer your way who doesn’t know how to make a legal arrest, you will still plead guilty and pay the violation for loitering.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 117</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;And that’s the problem with Justice by Attrition. It’s not just that it catches up innocent people in its massive dragnet. It’s also that it applies disproportionate punishment to the guilty.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 119</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;This was a man who was literally trying to go to jail instead of paying a hundred-dollar fine, and he couldn’t do it without multiple court dates and nearly a dozen hours of waiting and court time. It’s impossible to overestimate the impact, in terms of time and sheer frustration, that all these mindless arrests and summonses have on the people targeted.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 125</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Thus the speedy trial concept, what some lawyers call the crown jewel of the Anglo-American legal system, is easily reduced to a complete joke. Prosecutors won’t say so openly, but privately, they will admit that when their cases are weak, they drive their cases through this Lincoln Tunnel of a procedural loophole, dragging things out as long as possible to force a plea. It usually works.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 127</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;There are two important concepts here that work hand in hand. One, there’s the idea that failure to follow a police order, no matter how stupid or unreasonable, is cause for an arrest or a summons. The second idea is that the prosecutor can essentially turn any misdemeanor case against almost anyone into a de facto conviction, simply by filing charges and following through long enough with pretrial pressure to wrest a plea out of the accused.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 130</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;And once you take one plea, you might lose all kinds of things. Financial aid for schooling is out if you have a joint-in-your-pocket case. Welfare payments, beds at homeless shelters, Section 8 housing—it all might go up in smoke the instant you look at a police officer the wrong way.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 132</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;[…] puts an entire segment of the population constantly on the defensive, gives it a criminal record essentially in advance, puts everyone in the dragnet up front, so that one false move leads to real time.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 133</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Nicknamed “the Gorilla,” Fuld is a tall, cavern-eyed, hollow-cheeked bully who was famous for his quick-twitch meanness, his screaming intransigence, and his apparently congenital inability to blame himself for any problem. Fuld is the kind of person who would fall drunk down a spiral staircase and then sue the architect for building blurry steps.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 145</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;It had started with borrowing cash in three-month loans, then it was one-month notes, and then the cycle got even tighter and crazier. By the end of 2007, Lehman was sometimes borrowing $100 billion or even $200 billion a day or more just to stay afloat. The life-saving cash injections came from overnight “repo” loans from banks like Fidelity that Lehman took out at the end of every single business day. And the first thing in the morning, it was paying off those loans by taking out matching amounts of “intraday” loans from banks like JPMorgan Chase. Then it was rinse, repeat: continue the cycle by rolling the loans later that night.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 148</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;What’s amazing about this is that the Fed saw fit as early as January 2008 to warn Chase about Lehman’s instability. But nobody ever warned the public. Nobody stepped in after the bank cooked its books in Repo 105, or misreported taxes, or made fake disclosures, or lied outright to investors. Nothing was done. The government merely sat back and watched the catastrophe unfold, allowing new victims to pour money into the walking-dead bank right up until its collapse.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 152</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The deals the government and Wall Street worked out that weekend to save the likes of AIG, Goldman, Deutsche Bank, Morgan Stanley, and Merrill Lynch were unprecedented in their reach and political consequence, transforming America into a permanent oligarchical bailout state. <strong>This was, essentially, a formal merger of Wall Street and the U.S. government.</strong>&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 156</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;This second deal was done in the ether, in an extralegal dimension where so much of Wall Street business is increasingly transacted. It was the legal equivalent of “dark liquidity” or “dark pools,” places where huge blocks of stock trades are executed between major institutional buyers and sellers without passing information on to the hayseed public, which knows only how to buy and sell stocks on regulated stock exchanges. A dark pool trade is conducted between two huge players who don’t want to deign to let the NYSE or any other stock exchange know their business.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 160</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Wall Street criminals bank on the terminal intellectual insecurity of their regulators. They dare prosecutors to call what they’ve done crimes, knowing they’ll be hesitant to disagree with the hotshot defense lawyers from New York and Washington who make forty or fifty times what they do.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 176</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Transactions of this type, used to move billion-dollar hunks of money around, are couched in language that is essentially foreign to the layperson, as foreign as Swahili or Esperanto are to most Americans. It is a difficult, frustrating, atonal, counterintuitive, and thoroughly unattractive language. This place is a foreign nation all to itself, as unique and proud of its peculiar culture as, say, France. Because of the language problem, the only people competent to prosecute the crimes committed within its borders are other French people. Only the problem is, to stretch this strained metaphor just a little further, if you spend enough time in France, you start thinking like a French person. If you follow enough of these Wall Street cases, you start to see this phenomenon all over the place. You go into court the first day, and everyone in the room, right down to the judge and even the plaintiffs’ attorneys, looks like Marcel Marceau. And they talk in blasé tones about acts of perversion that would shock a normal person to the point of screams.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 183</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Essentially, paragraph 13 unterminated the terminated repo, then reterminated it on Barclays’s own terms. Ingeniously lunatic mind-loops like this are why one pays certain lawyers a thousand dollars an hour.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 186</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The quiet filing of that letter, with its inscrutable paragraph 13 buried in thousands of words of even more inscrutable legalese, was how Judge Peck was “informed” of the Barclays decision to keep the $5 billion from the repo.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 187</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Peck’s point was that since Barclays was the only known buyer at the time, if in September 2008 it needed to make $13 billion on the deal to pull the trigger and buy the Lehman assets, it would always need $13 billion to do the deal—therefore its method of securing that $13 billion should not be reinvestigated. But this is wrong on its face. What might or might not have happened if all that information had come out is completely unknowable, even to someone as close to God as a federal judge. Nobody else was willing to buy Lehman at the “official” sale price, but <strong>are we really to believe that no other company would have been willing to do the deal with a $12 billion discount? That no other firm would have been willing to take on a first-day $5 billion gain?</strong>&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 191</div></div><p>Excellent point. So good.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;When asked why he didn’t contact the Department of Justice to help it begin a criminal investigation, Geithner essentially said that the DOJ had access to the information from media reports and didn’t need his help. The primary banking regulator in America didn’t contact the Justice Department because he said it could read about the case in the newspapers!&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 195</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Today every local official with a badge—every cop, sheriff, ranger, or even game warden—has the power to instantly separate children from mothers, husbands from wives. All America, from the smallest town on up, has become a dragnet.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 200</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;[…] a ferocious federal immigration rule called 287(g) that essentially deputizes any and all state and local law enforcement officials to arrest undocumented aliens on behalf of the U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement agency (ICE). Today every local official with a badge—every cop, sheriff, ranger, or even game warden—has the power to instantly separate children from mothers, husbands from wives. All America, from the smallest town on up, has become a dragnet.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 200</div></div><p>This was in 2012, 4 years before Trump, at the beginning of Obama&rsquo;s second term.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The squad cars perch on the sides of the road like ticks on a vein, hauling in alien after undocumented alien and tossing them into the criminal justice/deportation hopper. From there, in a complex, arbitrary, and mindlessly cruel legal process that puts people literally in chains for the crime of going to work or taking their kids to school, the detainees get ground up into a rich financial and political meal, shared in nearly equal parts by state and federal authorities on the one hand and private prison companies on the other.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 201</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;So the undocumented alien who kills a room full of Rotarians with an ax has a right to counsel, a phone call, and protection against improper searches. The alien caught crossing the street on his way to work has no rights at all.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 203</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;But the truth is, she’s likely to lose her case and will almost certainly be deported soon. Her seven children and her husband will almost certainly stay here in America. So she has a year left with her family. All because she got her fender nicked on the way to pick up some milk. The number of stories like this boggles the mind. Three hundred ninety-six thousand, nine hundred and six people were deported from the United States in 2011.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 206</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;“Obama has broken all the deportation records,” says Nieblas. “One million people in just a few years. Incredible.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 207</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;So we’ve built a massive and ruthless police apparatus for the ordinary immigrant population, complete with a sprawling, essentially extralegal detention complex, to catch and detain people who have not committed any actual crimes. This gigantic, menacing complex of bars, chains, buses, and airplanes built to deal with the immigrant poor stands in stark contrast to the tiny, disorganized confederation of perhaps a few hundred lawyers policing transnational financial companies. We don’t have special jails for foreigners or executives from foreign firms who steal by the million or billion.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 207</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;For a country founded on the idea that rights are inalienable and inherent from birth, we’ve developed a high tolerance for conditional rights and conditional citizenship. And the one condition, it turns out, is money. If you have a lot of it, the legal road you get to travel is well lit and beautifully maintained. If you don’t, it’s a dark alley and most Americans would be shocked to find out what’s at the end of it.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 208</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The giant dragnet created by 287(g) is inspiring a whole new generation of epic survival tales. The stories you hear from people who’ve disappeared at checkpoints and roadblocks sound eerily like the literature of the Soviet gulag, with the same themes of repeat interrogations, marches, chains, total alienation from family, and clashes with harsh nature, lunatic bureaucracies, and petty human predators of every imaginable species, some wearing uniforms and some not.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 211</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;This seemed to represent the ultimate white-folks win-win: local chicken-plant owners got to keep their cheap labor, while local police still got to milk the immigrant community for any money they made working at those plants.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 229</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;It even came out, in the famous Bernie Madoff case, that despite numerous complaints to the SEC over the years from reputable sources, nobody in the government even checked to make sure Madoff’s hedge fund even made trades at all. <strong>Madoff actually went more than thirteen years without making a single stock purchase and yet somehow survived several SEC investigations</strong>—that’s how flimsy government regulation of hedge funds has been and still is.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 256</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;To paint the tape on ADM, Graber and Israel would call eight different brokers and put in buy orders simultaneously to run up the price—at a time when Graber was holding lots of the stock ready to sell into a rising market. It was a racket the Securities and Exchange Commission was hopelessly ill-equipped to stop.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 257</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;We know this because traders for Chanos and Cohen and others sent one another reams of emails and texts blithely bragging about their access to this nonpublic information&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 266</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;As it happens, this sort of behavior—bank analysts sharing their research with hedge fund clients—was so common at the time that it ultimately became the centerpiece of the so-called Global Settlement arranged by Eliot Spitzer and the SEC with big Wall Street banks like Goldman Sachs, Lehman Brothers, Bear Stearns, and Piper Jaffray.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 267</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Tipping off a hedge fund that your analyst is going to give a “buy” rating to a stock weeks before that research is made public can be enormously valuable to the hedge fund, for the obvious reason that the fund now has a pretty good idea of a concrete date and time when the stock is going to tick upward. If the release of the research will have a material impact on the value of the stock, it becomes illegal and improper to trade on knowledge of such a report ahead of time.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 267</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;So say you borrow a share of IBM at 10. You sell it immediately for that ten bucks, then wait for something bad to happen (IBM forced to announce a product recall, say). The stock drops to 9. You can then go out and buy a share of IBM on the open market, return that share to your original source, and pocket a one-dollar profit. But what if IBM goes up? What if there is no product recall, and the next product IBM comes out with puts the iPad out of business? What if the stock goes past 10—to 15, 20, 40, 50 dollars? You still eventually have to return the stock. The higher the stock climbs, the more money you owe. And there’s no zero down there to stop the bleeding. You could pick wrong, bet against Google or Microsoft in its infancy, and end up beyond broke, hurtling down a bottomless financial pit.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 263</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;When you short a stock, you first borrow shares in the company, then sell them off immediately for cash. Then, after the stock’s value has dropped, you go out and buy the same amount of shares in the open market and return them to the original source.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 263</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Like most privileged, overeducated Americans who try it, they would suck at being real tough guys. They tried, however, and here’s the crazy thing: in a city where police in some neighborhoods define crime as standing on the sidewalk the wrong way, these idiots took their stock-trading act-like-a-thug life, screwed it up a hundred different ways, and not only couldn’t get arrested, they couldn’t even get police of any kind to notice.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 275</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Rivett, Watsa, and the rest of the Fairfax executives had no way of knowing it at the time, but all this activity had been orchestrated by millionaire and billionaire hedge fund managers with bets against Fairfax, men who had gotten together and hired the aforementioned shadowy fixer extraordinaire Spyro Contogouris to commence a wide-ranging campaign of harassment against the&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 283</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The scam depicted in the chart was an Enronesque maze of phantom revenues and hidden budget holes, an ingenious robbing-Peter-to-pay-Paul scheme in which Fairfax was essentially borrowing billions against its European assets and capitalizing its subsidiaries with shares in other subsidiaries, a complex and indecipherable bookkeeping merry-go-round. Far different and more complex from the original charge of simply being undercapitalized, the new charges were a lurid and compelling suspense tale, complete with all the bells and whistles of great storytelling that had been absent from the original dry Gwynn report.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 296</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;In all, in the eight months after July 26, 2006, Fairfax regained about $2 billion in stock value. The two critical events, the filing of the lawsuit and the arrest of Contogouris, said absolutely nothing about the company’s performance as an insurer. The only thing that changed in that time was the attitude of the global investing community toward the company. It had nothing to do with justice, the regulatory system, or the wisdom of the good old-fashioned Adam Smith capitalist marketplace. Instead, what began as a confidence game ended as a confidence game. <strong>The entire thing was a battle of public relations. It had nothing to do with real economics.</strong>&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 301</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;In another sense, though, the crime occurred nowhere in particular. If a hedge fund magnate in Westchester or Long Island sends an email to a bank analyst in Tennessee (where Morgan Keegan keeps its headquarters) to discuss the manipulation of the stock of a Canadian insurance company that’s listed on the New York Stock Exchange but retains a major subsidiary in New Jersey, where did the offense take place? It depended, entirely, on how you looked at things.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 305</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;When Harlem residents Michael McMichael and Anthony Odom drove down 161st Street in a new-looking Range Rover, police immediately profiled the car as being bought with illegal income. But when Stevie Cohen claimed to be 400 percent more efficient than the entire investing world fifteen years running, talked publicly about his billion-bucks-a-year income, and bought a 6,000-square-foot, Zamboni-treated skating rink for his mansion just a few years after opening his own business, nobody blinked until decades had passed and multiple companies had been destroyed.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 310</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;In fact, courts have been slowly chipping away at the Fourth Amendment protection against unreasonable searches and seizures for a long time, and the dominant theme in this gradual legal erosion has been an innovative new form of institutional racism, and a creepy inverse correlation between rights and need.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 319</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Over and over again, we hear that if you owe money in a certain way, or if you receive a certain kind of public assistance, you forfeit this or that line item in the Bill of Rights. If you’re a person of means, you get full service for all ten amendments, and even a few that aren’t listed. But if you owe, if you rent, you get a slightly thinner, more tubercular version of the Fourth Amendment, the First Amendment, the Fifth and Sixth Amendments, and so on.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 319</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;It’s not that it’s written anywhere that if you’re black and you live in the projects, you don’t get protection against illegal searches—it just sort of works out that way. And if this makes any sense at all, it’s not about skin color. This is a cultural kind of bias. White people who live the wrong way get caught in the net, too.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 319</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;But Douglas was overruled, of course, because the implicit intent of Wyman—not its explicit intent, but very much the implied meaning—didn’t cover everyone, just black welfare moms like Barbara James. No one else had to trade the Bill of Rights for government aid. So the state got to keep its “gentle means” of checking to make sure tax dollars were reaching appropriate destinations.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 321</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;As Americans, we’re all beginning to develop a second sense about who gets to feel the business end of the criminal justice system, and when, and who doesn’t, and why. That second sense we all carry around in our minds is our true government. It’s very different from the Schoolhouse Rock! official version, and different from the one we see celebrated every four years in our presidential campaign system. Schoolhouse Rock! teaches us that everyone is treated equally under the law, and that our government is one we’ve chosen in free elections, but at the same time we somehow know not to be surprised when that turns out not to be completely true.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 321</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;By the time all these companies were finished first inflating and then crashing a huge global asset bubble based on overvalued mortgages, the world had lost trillions of dollars—one extremely conservative estimate by the IMF put the losses at $4 trillion.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 322</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;In every single one of those cases, the relevant companies were allowed to settle without admitting wrongdoing. Not a single individual was charged in any of those cases. Not a single individual had to pay so much as a dime of his own money in damages.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 323</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Twenty-six billion dollars of fraud: no felony cases. But when the stakes are in the hundreds of dollars, we kick in 26,000 doors a year, in just one county.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 323</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;These inscrutable, irrational structures, crisscrossing back and forth between the worlds of debt and banking and law enforcement, are growing up organically around the pounding twin impulses that drive modern America: burning hatred of all losers and the poor, and breathless, abject worship of the rich, even the talentless and undeserving rich.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 324</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;It mechanically, automatically keeps the poor poor, devours money from the middle class, and sends it upward. And because it’s fueled by the irrepressibly rising vapor of our darkest hidden values, it attacks people without money, particularly nonwhite people, with a weirdly venomous kind of hatred, treating them like they’re already guilty of something, which of course they are—namely, being that which we’re all afraid of becoming.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 324</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;These bureaucracies accomplish just two things: they make small piles of money smaller and big piles of money bigger.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 326</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;There’s a cultural spectrum these bureaucracies are attuned to that roughly ranges from black poverty to white wealth. Where you are on that spectrum determines how much of a citizen you get to be.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 326</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Things that are jailable crimes on one end of that spectrum become speeding tickets on the other. We find white people on the jail end and black people on the speeding ticket end, but for the most part … well, for the most part, you know what I mean. That winking understanding we all share about who gets the book thrown at him and who doesn’t, that’s where American racism has gone: unspoken and hidden, but bureaucratized and automated, and therefore more powerful than ever.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 326</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;At the top end of American society, we’ve found out in recent years that lying for profit is actually considered a virtue, and a certain sector of the population fiercely defends its right to earn a living that way.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 327</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;When you see, up close, where the awesome power of the American criminal justice space station is directed, you will begin scratching your head, no matter what you think of people on welfare.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 329</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;[…] she went to the local welfare office—a “Family Resource Center,” known as an FRC—and walked inside. She was barely sober, emotionally a wreck, literally penniless, and her entire ambition in life was to keep and maintain a room and a half in a rundown section of west San Diego without having to sell her body to pay the rent.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 332</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;This is the kind of person at whom the weight of the state’s financial fraud prosecution apparatus tends to be trained in America. Markisha entered the financial fraud patrol zone when she walked through those doors at the FRC. For three hundred dollars a month, she was about to become more heavily scrutinized by the state than any twelve Wall Street bankers put together.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 333</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;[…] they then tell you to go home and sit tight for your P100 search. And they don’t tell you when that will be, except to say that it’s generally within a week and a half. You then have to be at home at all times until they show up—it’s like sitting shivah, except you have to do it for more than a week. “If the investigator shows up and no one’s there,” says Halpern, “they shove a card under your door that says, ‘We could not verify your eligibility,’ and you don’t get your benefits.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 336</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;For instance, in 2011, the state of Ohio—the same state that lost tens of millions in the early 2000s when its pension fund bought severely overpriced mortgage-backed securities from a Lehman Brothers banker named John Kasich, who would later become governor—tried to recoup some of its losses by sending out 22,000 notices to Ohioans seeking “overpayments” in either welfare or food stamps.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 341</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;For instance, in 2011, the state of Ohio—the same state that lost tens of millions in the early 2000s when its pension fund bought severely overpriced mortgage-backed securities from a Lehman Brothers banker named John Kasich, who would later become governor—tried to recoup some of its losses by sending out 22,000 notices to Ohioans seeking “overpayments” in either welfare or food stamps. Many if not most of these “overpayments” were actually the state’s own errors, but they went as far back as 1986 anyway, seeking checks as small as $78.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 341</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;But according to the state, they’d also committed fraud at least three times: when Diego received benefits without qualifying for them, when Diego “lied” about his January income, and when Anna overcollected in cash aid without paying the money back.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 343</div></div><p>Absolutely fucking Kafkaesque.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The system therefore clearly doesn’t really work for the state, either. It’s like opening a hospital where no doctor could ever see the same patient twice—the bureaucratic version of Memento, where the characters have to go back in time to re-create a whole universe of facts from the beginning in each new scene.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 344</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;These associations have effectively lobbied for increased welfare fraud prosecution and investigation and have helped create a new cottage industry within government. Some states have actually increased funding for fraud investigation because the programs are paid for by federal funds they would lose if they weren’t spent—in other words, rather than lose funding because of reduced welfare rolls, states simply increase the amount of staff for welfare fraud investigation.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 345</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;These cases are often felony fraud cases, and DAs are hot for them because (a) they never, ever lose them and (b) it boosts their records. Fans of The Wire will connect to this dynamic: nothing quite jukes the stats like forty unopposed felony convictions a month. “DAs love these cases,” says Gustafson. “It raises their profiles before elections.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 346</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;No, the only offenders the local burghers will spend money to embarrass publicly are young, single, nonwhite mothers guilty of the crime of improperly receiving benefits. And as we’ve seen, it’s a stretch to assume that they’re all really guilty. The one thing we do know is that the people on this list every month are all flat broke and incapable of hiring a decent lawyer—and who knows, the fancy folk in Palm Springs might have an interest in shaming these people for that crime, as well.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 349</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;[…] banking watchdogs like the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency and the Office of Thrift Supervision simply stopped pursuing criminal investigations; groups that had referred thousands of cases a year to the Justice Department for prosecution during the S&amp;L crisis completely stopped that activity by the turn of the millennium. In 2009 the OCC referred zero cases for prosecution. On the other hand, welfare fraud was prosecuted like never before, and welfare fraud investigators multiplied like rats in every state of the country, forming unions and lobbying agencies.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 351</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Bill Clinton’s political formula for seizing the presidency was simple. He made money tight in the ghettos and let it flow free on Wall Street. He showered the projects with cops and bean counters and pulled the cops off the beat in the financial services sector. And in one place he created vast new mountain ranges of paperwork, while in another, paperwork simply vanished.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 351</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Clinton’s “third way” political strategy, in which Democrats laid down their arms of business regulation, allowed his party to compete with the Republicans for the campaign contributions of the big banks on Wall Street.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 351</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Both parties wanted to merge the social welfare system with law enforcement, creating a world that for the poor would be peopled everywhere by cops and bureaucrats and inane, humiliating rules.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 353</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;And on the other hand, both parties wanted the financial services sector to become an endless naked pillow fight, fueled by increasingly limitless amounts of cheap cash from the Federal Reserve (literally free cash, eventually). If they turned life in the projects into a police state, they turned life on Wall Street into its opposite. One lie in San Diego is a crime. But a million lies? That’s just good business.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 353</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;WaMu knew that the loans it was getting from Long Beach were fraudulent. A Senate investigation later revealed that the bank had, among other things, done internal audits of two of Long Beach’s most productive loan officers. They found fraud in 58 percent of the loans coming from one of those officers’ operations and in 83 percent of the other’s. Instead of firing the two men, they were given prizes for loan production.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 357</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;In that highly sordid and mostly overlooked chapter in the history of the bailout period, WaMu and its $307 billion in assets were delivered by the state into the hands of Chase and its CEO, Jamie Dimon, for the preposterously low price of $1.9 billion, a bargain deal that was struck just a few weeks before Chase was given $25 billion in cash by the government as part of the TARP bailouts. This was Chase’s second sweetheart deal in less than a year.</p>
<p>&ldquo;Six months before, in March 2008, Chase had “rescued” the imploding investment banking giant Bear Stearns, buying the venerable firm with the aid of $29 billion in guarantees extended by the New York branch of the Federal Reserve—whose chairman of the board of directors at the time was, get this, JPMorgan Chase CEO Jamie Dimon.</p>
<p>&ldquo;That means that six months after Jamie Dimon was the lucky recipient of his own Federal Reserve bailout in order to acquire Bear Stearns, his bank was given another $25 billion in cash by the state to go on another shopping spree, cash he used, among other things, to buy Washington Mutual.&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 359</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;But Almonte had arrived at Chase in the first place only by means of a government-approved scheme to conceal toxic assets from the public. The company’s state-sanctioned job was to hide fraud from the public. So when she found more fraud at Chase, where was she supposed to go? To the same government that used Chase to cover up two earlier scandals?&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 360</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Here we should digress for a moment to talk about a legend that’s been circulating about the financial crisis, a legend our leaders like to tell over and over. It goes something like this: Yes, bad things happened, but none of those bad things were crimes. Greed isn’t illegal. Making too much money isn’t illegal. Nothing to see here, move along.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 364</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Obama gave a simple explanation. “Banks are in the business of making money,” he said. “And they find loopholes.” So what kind of “loophole finding” went on in Chase’s credit card litigation office? Not only did the bank apparently have full-time employees assigned to the job of committing mass perjury, it even went so far as to rope the entire department into the cause when the normal robo-signing staff couldn’t handle the workload.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 364</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Once Linda was out the door, Chase put the sale back on, errors or no errors. They quickly found a buyer, and 23,000 “judgments” went out into the world—a teeming school of little mutant fish, swimming blindly into courthouses from one coast to the other, each in search of a human being to collect from.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 369</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;But the business of credit card litigation by its very nature has to be half-assed, brutal, reckless, and stupid. The business model just doesn’t work otherwise. The giant consumer credit merchants like Chase who file lawsuits against cardholders by the tens of thousands couldn’t even begin to make real money, real margins, if they had to do anything like real legal work or meet anything like a real evidentiary standard.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 371</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Many process servers and law firms engage in a wink-wink-nudge-nudge business called gutter service or sewer service, in which the law firm hands the list of summonses to the server, and the server simply dumps them (in the “gutter,” hence the name). In return, the process server hands the law firm an “affidavit of service,” swearing that he properly served the customer. Process service once required a signature of the defendant to prove proper service; now all that’s needed is the server’s own word that he did the job.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 373</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Thus not only may a credit card customer legally be served at some ancient address without her knowledge, it’s highly possible that the server won’t even bother to extend her that courtesy. This is why, in a huge percentage of credit card cases, the cardholder never even sees the summons and consequently never appears in court to defend himself.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 374</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;What all this means is that the bulk of the credit card collection business is conducted without any supporting documentation showing up or being seen by human eyes at any part of the process. The meat of the business is collecting unopposed default judgments from defendants who either never receive a summons or receive one and never appear in court.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 376</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;At no time in the process do most collectors ever actually need to produce evidence of a legitimate debt or a legitimate judgment.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 376</div></div><p>What&rsquo;s stopping them from making them up wholesale? You wouldn&rsquo;t be able to tell the difference. If no-one checks, then you don&rsquo;t serve and just make up a number for nonexistent card and garnish their wages after judgment. Why even buy accounts from Chase? You don&rsquo;t need them.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;So how do you collect money from a cardholder who doesn’t answer his or her summons? That’s easy: you take it! The laws are different from state to state, but in most places in America, once the bank or debt buyer has that default judgment in hand, it can legally do just about anything to the cardholder. It can put a lien on his property, it can attach her salary, it can even take his car or her office furniture.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 376</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;[…] executives soon realized that in the overwhelmed modern court system, simply attesting to having the right documentation works just as well as really having it. This is the same realization that struck Bank of America when it found that saying it had foreclosure documents was almost as good as having them—and the same one that touched process servers at American Legal Process, who found that claiming to have delivered a summons was almost as good as (and certainly cheaper than) actually doing it.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 378</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Also, Chase never informed any of its customers that their debt had been assigned to a new company, which according to the judge’s ruling was a red flag in light of recent experience. “On a regular basis this court encounters defendants being sued on the same debt by more than one creditor alleging it is the assignee of the original credit card obligation,” he wrote. “… Without receiving such notice of the assignment, a debtor seeking to make any application to the court would not have any idea as to which alleged creditor is to be served.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 378</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;All Straniere saw was the broad sloppiness and inattention to procedure that attended the entire deal in general. The DebtOne deal was simply a typical transaction in a consumer credit industry that depends upon robo-signing, mass fraud, and intentionally thin paperwork as essential elements of its profit model. Straniere didn’t nix the DebtOne judgments because he knew, as Almonte knew, that a large percentage of them were rife with errors and might not even have been valid judgments. He did it because the accounts had been so sloppily transferred that it was impossible to tell the difference.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 378</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The final irony in all this? At the same time that Chase was pumping out tens of thousands of bogus collection notices into the economy, the company was being supported, financially, by the federal government in a dozen different ways.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 381</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Less well known is that Chase was extended billions more in guarantees to help buy the corpse of Bear Stearns. It was allowed to borrow $33 billion more against the state’s credit card—if it defaulted on those loans, we’d have picked up the bill—through an even more obscure Federal Reserve program called the Temporary Liquidity Guarantee Program. A whole alphabet soup of other Fed bailout programs, like the Commercial Paper Funding Facility, the Term Auction Facility, and the Primary Dealer Credit Facility, allow banks like Chase to borrow billions of dollars at near-zero or zero interest.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 381</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;What this means is that the entire business model for something like Chase’s credit card business is not much more than a gigantic welfare fraud scheme. These companies borrow hundreds of billions of dollars from the Fed at rock-bottom rates, then turn around and lend it out to the world at 5, 10, 15, 20 percent, as credit cards and mortgages, boat loans and aircraft loans, and so on. If you pay it back, great, it’s a 500 percent or 1,000 percent or 4,000 percent profit for the bank. If you don’t pay it back, the company can put your name in the hopper to be sued. A $5,000 debt on a credit card for the now-defunct Circuit City, which was actually a Chase card, became a $13,000 or $14,000 debt by the time the bank finished applying fees and penalties.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 382</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;[…] every single one of those hundreds of thousands of credit judgments—be they foreclosures or credit card accounts—contains a line item with a court-mandated collection fee or other such payout to local law enforcement.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 382</div></div><p>People are charged for their own evictions.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;It’s not just that there’s no criminal penalty for fraud on such a grand scale; your business doesn’t even have to suffer. You can defraud the state over and over again, and the state will still be happy to do business with you. You can still issue municipal bonds, and you can still be one of twenty-one banks given the privilege of being primary dealers of government debt.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 383</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Plenty of people—consumers and merchants both—are probably glad that so much credit is available, but they don’t realize that systematic fraud is part of what makes it available.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 383</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The crucial thing to understand is that if businesses like consumer credit cards are going to give cards away in the mail to everyone with a pulse, then the process almost by definition has to involve fraud.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 383</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;When the state brings a fraud case against a welfare mom, it brings it with disgust, with rage, because in addition to committing the legal crime, she’s committed the political crime of being needy and an eyesore. Banks commit the legal crime of fraud wholesale; they do so out in the open, have entire departments committed to it, and have employees who’ve spent years literally doing nothing but commit, over and over again, the same legal crime that some welfare mothers go to jail for doing once. But they’re not charged, because there’s no political crime. <strong>The system is not disgusted by the organized, mechanized search for profit. It’s more like it’s impressed by it.</strong>&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 383</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Of course this reads like a shocker story only because Patrick Jewell is a white, college-educated musician. Imagine the same story a few hundred thousand times over, and you’re starting to plug into the ordinary urban nonwhite experience. And that, too, is a collateral consequence we’ve decided we can live with.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 395</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Patrick Jewell most likely was some plainclothes policeman’s fleeting visual error—a rolled cigarette mistaken from a distance as a joint. But instead of simply walking up to him and asking him what he was smoking, law enforcement’s first move was to assault him, then frame him, toss him in jail, and run him all the way through the system without apology, rather than admit the mistake.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 395</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Being white and middle class never meant your kids breezed into Yale with a C average. That kind of privilege was always reserved for a special kind of wealth. But it did once mean that police would think twice before bouncing your head off a sidewalk. Not anymore.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 395</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Obama was echoing the main mantra that continued to emanate from Wall Street after the crash, in which high-level executives involved in this or that scandal repeatedly insisted that what they had done was not actually against the law. The thing that’s interesting about this claim isn’t that it’s factually wrong, which incidentally it almost always is, often to a humorously enormous degree. What’s interesting is that the people who make this claim usually believe it to be true.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 397</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Lawyers admire the right kind of “aggressive” for the same reason we love heist movies: we sympathize with anyone clever enough to penetrate the impenetrable. But those same attorneys sometimes have a hard time seeing past the daring all the way to the consequences on the other end, which might very well be something like seventy thousand creditors losing thousands of dollars apiece, or a whole company’s shareholders losing a total of $600 million.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 399</div></div><p>Here, even Taibbi falls into the habit of using the wrong verb. They didn&rsquo;t <em>lose</em> it. It was stolen.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;There were tens of thousands of cases just as insidious as the Simpson case, and each one of them was a truly despicable criminal fraud. But no individuals were ever prosecuted for this kind of crime. Meanwhile you can open up the newspaper virtually any day of the week—not just in Riverside County, California, but just about anywhere—and read about someone who’s been criminally sentenced for welfare fraud.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 403</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The total amount of money reportedly laundered in his case was somewhere in the area of $16 million. HSBC admitted to laundering more than $800 million. Trevino laundered for the Zetas; HSBC, for their rivals, the Sinaloa cartel. Trevino could get twenty years. At HSBC, again, nobody got even one day. These are enormous discrepancies. There’s a huge difference between twenty years and nothing—that is, a banker slapped with fines he doesn’t even personally pay. So what justifies the difference? Is there any conceivable reasonable explanation?&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 404</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;[…] in all but a very few of these cases, the narrative is exactly the same. There is somehow just enough evidence to extract hundreds of millions or even billions of dollars in penalties, but somehow not quite enough evidence to force any individual to do so much as a day in jail. Every single time, the state lands itself right in that oddly enormous sweet spot between spectacular leverage (to extract fines) and no leverage at all (to hand down criminal penalties).&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 407</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;This is an important distinction, that in this period of extreme crisis, we not only didn’t allocate funds to investigate the crash, we actively did increase the budget to tackle street crime, incidentally at a time of declining street violence.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 408</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;[…] what it concedes is that there’s a concrete difference between how we treat an individual who commits fraud within the structure of a giant multinational company with a lot of settlement money lying around, and how we treat, say, an ordinary broke person who commits welfare or unemployment fraud.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 408</div></div><p><em>Or doesn&rsquo;t commit a crime at all</em>, as Taibbi himself repeatedly pointed out. The welfare cheating is sometimes or even often just clerical errors. Credit card debt is active fraud. Instead of prosecuting giant crimes by unacceptable perpetrators, they&rsquo;re inventing and then prosecuting smaller ones, on acceptable victims.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;This is coward’s language. No true cop would ever think like this. Real police will go after the bad guy no matter who he is or how well protected he might be. In fact, the best of them will take on a villain even when winning is a long shot. There’s value even in trying and losing sometimes. It’s not as tangible as a billion dollars, but it’s real enough.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 409</div></div><p>And that billion dollar settlement amounts to the government getting a cut of the action. The banks will do it again and the government gets its fee. It&rsquo;s a business relationship or I can&rsquo;t tell the difference.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;At the end of 2011, the SEC bragged to Congress that it had completed 735 enforcement actions. It didn’t mention that fully one-sixth—131 of them—were 12(j) deals, shooting the corpses of companies like Longtop Financial or American Capital Partners or Austral Pacific Energy. It issues fancy press releases for a lot of these actions, often tossing in something sexy in the headline if there’s a Congress-friendly angle—“SEC Charges China-Based Longtop Financial Technologies for Deficient Filings” is an example.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 412</div></div>      </div>
      </div>
        <div class="footer">
    <div class="footer-data"><div class="footer-links"><ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/contact.php" title="">Contact</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/support.php" title="">Support</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/privacy.php" title="">Privacy</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/rights.php" title="">Rights</a></li></ul></div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="copyright">Copyright (c) 1999-2026 earthli.com. All Rights Reserved.</div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="versions">Powered by <ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore/app_news.php">earthli News 3.7</a></li><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore" title="">earthli WebCore&trade; 3.7</a></li></ul></div></div>    </div>
      </div>
  </div>  </body>
</html>
]]>
  </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
      <title type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[Im Westen nichts Neues by Erich Maria Remarque (1929; read in 2020)]]>
  </title>
    <id>https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=4031</id>
    <link href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=4031"/>
    <updated>2021-01-02T22:56:56+01:00</updated>
    <author>
        <name type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[Marco von Ballmoos]]>
  </name>
      <uri>https://earthli.com/users/marco</uri>
    </author>
      <summary type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<blockquote class="quote abstract "><div>Disclaimer: these are notes I took while reading this book. They include citations I found interesting or enlightening or particularly well-written. In some cases, I&rsquo;ve pointed out which of these applies to which citation; in others, I have not. Any benefit you gain from reading these notes is... [<a class="complete-text-link" href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=4031">More</a>]</div></blockquote>]]>
  </summary>
      <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<html lang="en">
  <head>
    <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/themes/ice.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/fonts/raleway.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/core/medium.css">
  </head>
  <body>
<div class="style-controls">  <div class="page">
    <div class="page-body">
<div class="info-box-top">
<p>
Published by <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_user.php?name=marco" title="Marco von Ballmoos" class="visible">marco</a> on <span class="date-time">2. Jan 2021 22:56:56 (GMT-5)</span>
</p>
</div>
      <div class="text-flow wide">
  <blockquote class="quote abstract "><div>Disclaimer: these are notes I took while reading this book. They include citations I found interesting or enlightening or particularly well-written. In some cases, I&rsquo;ve pointed out which of these applies to which citation; in others, I have not. Any benefit you gain from reading these notes is purely incidental to the purpose they serve of reminding me what I once read. Please see Wikipedia for a summary if I&rsquo;ve failed to provide one sufficient for your purposes. If my notes serve to trigger an interest in this book, then I&rsquo;m happy for you.</div></blockquote><p>This book is written from the point of view of a young German named Paul Bäumer, who fights at the German/French front during WWI. Over the course of the book, the harsh world in which he finds himself hones his cynicism, makes him more jaded.</p>
<p>We meet Paul at the front, having already acclimated there with his colleagues, Albert Kropp, a former schoolmate from his hometown; Haie Westhus, a hulking young man; Friedrich Müller, another classmate of Paul&rsquo;s, more interested in book learning than the others; Stanislaus Katczinsky, an older reservist with a ton of experience and a nearly unmatched penchant for survival; and Tjaden, a young man with a prodigious appetite: Detering, a simple farmer boy; Kantorek, the former schoolmaster and fervent supporter of the war; and, finally, Himmelstoss, the former-postmaster-turned-corporal who tormented them all during basic training.</p>
<p>At the front, they engage in the nearly unutterable filthiness and desolation of trench warfare, moving a few meters back and forth each day. They are all dulled by a lack of rations, but almost more by a lack of sleep.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Katczinsky hat recht: es wäre alles nicht so schlimm mit dem Krieg, wenn man nur mehr Schlaf haben würde. Vorne ist es doch nie etwas damit, und vierzehn Tage jedesmal sind eine lange Zeit.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 20-21</div></div><p>A common theme is that the people at home don&rsquo;t understand at all what it&rsquo;s like at the front. They are too quick to judge those that try to avoid the fight or to flee.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;[…] wußten wir bereits, daß die Todesangst stärker ist. Wir wurden darum keine Meuterer, keine Deserteure, keine Feiglinge – alle diese Ausdrücke waren ihnen ja so leicht zur Hand […]&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 113-116</div></div><p>Confronted with a battlefield filled with the dead, wounded and barely surviving in a roiled sea of mud, blood, and oil, … who can blame them for &ldquo;forgetting&rdquo; what they were fighting for, for &ldquo;forgetting&rdquo; the people at home and their desire for &ldquo;victory&rdquo;?</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Die Gewehre verkrusten, die Uniformen verkrusten, alles ist fließend und aufgelöst, eine triefende, feuchte, ölige Masse Erde, in der die gelben Tümpel mit spiralig roten Blutlachen stehen und Tote, Verwundete und Überlebende langsam versinken.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 2410-2412</div></div><p>For the young, the war becomes all they&rsquo;ve ever known. Their days in school are finished. When—if—they return, they&rsquo;ll have nothing to return to. The older soldiers still have a families and jobs—they have some other routine to which they can yearn to return. The young don&rsquo;t even that that. They become fatalistic without even the years of experience needed to master the philosophy.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Der Krieg hat uns weggeschwemmt. Für die andern, die älteren, ist er eine Unterbrechung, sie können über ihn hinausdenken.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 171-173</div></div><p>They think about what life will be like after, should they survive the war, about having spent two years away from a home that they will no longer recognize as their own.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Kropp denkt ebenfalls darüber nach. »Es wird überhaupt schwer werden mit uns allen. Ob die sich in der Heimat eigentlich nicht manchmal Sorgen machen deswegen? Zwei Jahre Schießen und Handgranaten – das kann man doch nicht ausziehen wie einen Strumpf nachher.«&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 732-734</div></div><p>They know how senseless their survival is, that with being clever and careful they can only improve very long odds. Fortune is the final arbiter.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Jeder Soldat bleibt nur durch tausend Zufälle am Leben. Und jeder Soldat glaubt und vertraut dem Zufall.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 842-842</div></div><p>That&rsquo;s not to say that experience counts for nothing.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Der Stellungskampf von heute erfordert Kenntnisse und Erfahrungen, man muß Verständnis für das Gelände haben, man muß die Geschosse, ihre Geräusche und Wirkungen im Ohr haben, man muß vorausbestimmen können, wo sie einbauen, wie sie streuen und wie man sich schützt. Dieser junge Ersatz weiß natürlich von alledem noch fast gar nichts.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 1104-1106</div></div><p>They spend long nights in wet holes in the ground. They watch fog rise from craters like ghosts. They see fields of uncollected corpses bloating in the heat. They starve, they dehydrate, they freeze. They watch deadly chloroform gas creep over the fields, fingering every crevasse with its tendrils.</p>
<p>From this, they suddenly return to camp and &ldquo;normality&rdquo;, knowing that a return to the madness and misery of the front is inevitable.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Alles ist Gewohnheit, auch der Schützengraben. Diese Gewohnheit ist der Grund dafür, daß wir scheinbar so rasch vergessen. Vorgestern waren wir noch im Feuer, heute machen wir Albernheiten und fechten uns durch die Gegend, morgen gehen wir wieder in den Graben.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 1175-1176</div></div><p>Paul loses the first of his comrades, watching him die in a hospital bed, getting thinner and thinner.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;[…] die Stirn wölbt sich stärker, die Backenknochen stehen vor. Das Skelett arbeitet sich durch. Die Augen versinken schon. In ein paar Stunden wird es vorbei sein.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 245-248</div></div><p>He and his company are assigned to guard duty for a month, guarding emaciated and surly Russian prisoners of war.</p>
<p>They will do nearly anything to eat good food. At one point, Paul and Kat hole up in a shed with a couple of roast chickens in one of the only truly wholesome scenes in the book.</p>
<p>Later, when the company is assigned to guard duty for a small town, they live high on the hog. One day, he and his comrades put together a grand meal, but the smoke from the fire attracts enemies. They continue cooking during the attack, loath to leave their supper behind. <span class="quote-inline">&ldquo;Doch das Pufferbacken wird jetzt schwieriger.&rdquo;</span></p>
<p>The boys take revenge on their former DI Himmelstoss when he is finally assigned to the front—and no longer has any true power over them. They sneak across a river to spend a night with some willing French girls, fraternizing with the &ldquo;enemy&rdquo;.</p>
<p>He describes a horse dying on the battlefield, completely unaware of what has happened to it, scrabbling its way forward in its life blindly—a metaphor for many of the soldiers who fall in a similarly senseless fashion.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Das letzte stemmt [Pferd] sich auf die Vorderbeine und dreht sich im Kreise wie ein Karussell, sitzend dreht es sich auf den hochgestemmten Vorderbeinen im Kreise, wahrscheinlich ist der Rücken zerschmettert. Der Soldat rennt hin und schießt es nieder. Langsam, demütig rutscht es zu Boden.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 538-540</div></div><p>Juxtaposed with the death of the horses is the equally senseless death of a young recruit (der <span class="quote-inline">&ldquo;kleine Rekrut[…] mit der Wunde&rdquo;</span>), who&rsquo;d only just gotten to the front on the same day that he had his entire waist destroyed by shrapnel. He was not going to survive. It was up to the boys to decide whether to prolong his suffering with a fruitless trip to the field hospital, where he would die—or, whether they would put him out his misery themselves. The miserable scene takes place in pouring rain.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Monoton pendeln die Wagen, monoton sind die Rufe, monoton rinnt der Regen. Er rinnt auf unsere Köpfe und auf die Köpfe der Toten vorn, auf den Körper des kleinen Rekruten mit der Wunde, die viel zu groß für seine Hüfte ist, er rinnt auf das Grab Kemmerichs, er rinnt auf unsere Herzen.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 628-630</div></div><p>On leave, he returns to his mother and his sister, who hesitantly ask him how it is, in the war. He lies, of course. How can he begin to explain to them what it&rsquo;s really like? Their worlds have drifted apart, likely irreparably.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Mutter, was soll ich dir darauf antworten! Du wirst es nicht verstehen und nie begreifen. Du sollst es auch nie begreifen. War es schlimm, fragst du. – Du, Mutter. – Ich schüttele den Kopf und sage:»Nein, Mutter, nicht so sehr. Wir sind ja mit vielen zusammen, da ist es nicht so schlimm.«&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 1376-1378</div></div><p>In his hometown for a few days, he already has PTSD. He hears the whistling of grenades in the squeal of tram wheels.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;[…] das Quietschen der Straßenbahnen sich wie heranheulende Granaten anhört […]&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 1416-1418</div></div><p>As with so many other soldiers of other wars in the century since this book was written, he regrets having come &ldquo;home&rdquo;. It is a reminder of how he no longer fits in anything resembling normalcy. It makes him bitter for what he has lost, but also bitter at those who stayed behind, benefitting, however indirectly, from the unseen and largely unacknowledged sacrifices at the front.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Ich hätte nie hierherkommen dürfen. […] Ich hätte nie auf Urlaub fahren dürfen.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 1586-1588</div></div><p>Back at war and Paul considers how he and his comrades have come to be trapped here: by the whims of higher-ups who make decisions nearly wholly unaware of what is happening in the real world. Orders are orders and they all follow them. Those that follow them don&rsquo;t understand why they were given; those that gave them don&rsquo;t understand what they mean to those who follow them.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;An irgendeinem Tisch wird ein Schriftstück von einigen Leuten unterzeichnet, die keiner von uns kennt, und jahrelang ist unser höchstes Ziel das, worauf sonst die Verachtung der Welt und ihre höchste Strafe ruht.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 1644-1646</div></div><p>Perhaps because they don&rsquo;t care, but also, possibly, because they are incapable of bridging the divide. They are too far away, the situation too abstract for them to understand the ramifications. This does not excuse them; it explains how they can live with themselves. They are simply unaware of what they are doing, like a man stepping on ants. Their remove insulates them. Our goal should be to avoid making such callous decisions.</p>
<p>Back at the front, Paul gets turned around on a mission and spends a day and night in a foxhole alone, save for the corpse of a Frenchman he&rsquo;d killed. The man had jumped blindly into the same foxhole to escape the same gas that kills Frenchman and German alike.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Jetzt sehe ich erst, daß du ein Mensch bist wie ich. Ich habe gedacht an deine Handgranaten, an dein Bajonett und deine Waffen – jetzt sehe ich deine Frau und dein Gesicht und das Gemeinsame. Vergib mir, Kamerad! Wir sehen es immerzu spät. Warum sagt man uns nicht immer wieder, daß ihr ebenso arme Hunde seid wie wir […]&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 1893-1900</div></div><p>When they escape the front, the troops ride on top of a wagon loaded with goods—<span class="quote-inline">&ldquo;[z]wischen uns steht ein Papageienkäfig, den wir für die Katze gefunden haben&rdquo;</span>—but there isn&rsquo;t room for everyone. There are countless internally displaced persons—families who&rsquo;ve lost their homes and everything but their lives—and they walk in the mud, with lowered eyes and, more often than not, nothing more than the clothes on their backs.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Ihre Gestalten sind gebeugt, ihre Gesichter voll Kummer, Verzweiflung, Hast und Ergebenheit. Die Kinder hängen an den Händen der Mütter, manchmal führt auch ein älteres Mädchen die Kleinen, die vorwärts taumeln und immer wieder zurücksehen. Einige tragen armselige Puppen mit sich. Alle schweigen, als sie an uns vorübergehen.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 2027-2029</div></div><p>Those that remain of the company end up in a hospital, far from the front, nursing their egregious but not hopeless wounds. The hospital has many, many patients, nearly all in worse shape than Paul. He lists them all, finishing with his usual sardonic flair.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Im Stockwerk tiefer liegen Bauch- und Rückenmarkschüsse, Kopfschüsse und beiderseitig Amputierte. Rechts im Flügel Kieferschüsse, Gaskranke, Nasen-, Ohren- und Halsschüsse. Links im Flügel Blinde und Lungenschüsse, Beckenschüsse, Gelenkschüsse, Nierenschüsse, Hodenschüsse, Magenschüsse. <strong>Man sieht hier erst, wo ein Mensch überall getroffen werden kann.</strong>&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 2217-2219</div></div><p>The war is not done with him, though. He heals. He returns to the front, but the German effort is unraveling, no longer even capable of pretending to support its cannon fodder. The English and American troops seem overwhelming, better armed, better fed. At this point, Paul is fully jaded, knowing that the factory owners back at home are growing fat on profit while the soldiers at the front tighten their belts over bellies empty of everything but a thin flour soup.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Wir aber sind mager und ausgehungert. Unser Essen ist so schlecht und mit so viel Ersatzmitteln gestreckt, daß wir krank davon werden. Die Fabrikbesitzer in Deutschland sind reiche Leute geworden – uns zerschrinnt die Ruhr die Därme. […]&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 2354-2358</div></div><p>And still Germany manages to find more bodies to send to the front. The hardened troops look with nonjudgmental and even gaze upon the fresh troops that arrive, inexperienced and untrained, they only know how to die. There are thousands of these, in ill-fitting uniforms—none were designed for such small frames—and hollow-eyed from a hunger that has reached from the front deep into Germany itself.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;»Deutschland muß bald leer sein«, sagt Kat.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 2361-2362</div></div><p>This was to be Kat&rsquo;s final joke. He soon died of a grievous head wound, despite Paul&rsquo;s heroic fireman&rsquo;s carry across a live battlefield. He&rsquo;d thought Kat had only a shattered shin, having overlooked the pinhole in his skull that ended him.</p>
<p>The title of the book comes from a report issued on the day the war finally took Paul. The author notes with cruel irony that on this day, </p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;[…] der Heeresbericht sich nur auf den Satz beschränkt[…], im Westen sei nichts Neues zu melden.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 2473-2474</div></div><h2>Citations</h2><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Katczinsky hat recht: es wäre alles nicht so schlimm mit dem Krieg, wenn man nur mehr Schlaf haben würde. Vorne ist es doch nie etwas damit, und vierzehn Tage jedesmal sind eine lange Zeit.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 20-21</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Es ist übrigens komisch, daß das Unglück der Welt so oft von kleinen Leuten herrührt, sie sind viel energischer und unverträglicher als großgewachsene.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 91-93</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;[…] während sie den Dienst am Staate als das Größte bezeichneten, wußten wir bereits, daß die Todesangst stärker ist. Wir wurden darum keine Meuterer, keine Deserteure, keine Feiglinge – alle diese Ausdrücke waren ihnen ja so leicht zur Hand -, wir liebten unsere Heimat genauso wie sie, und wir gingen bei jedem Angriff mutig vor; – aber wir unterschieden jetzt, wir hatten mit einem Male sehen gelernt. Und wir sahen, daß nichts von ihrer Welt übrig blieb. Wir waren plötzlich auf furchtbare Weise allein; – und wir mußten allein damit fertig werden.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 113-116</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Wir waren noch nicht eingewurzelt. Der Krieg hat uns weggeschwemmt. Für die andern, die älteren, ist er eine Unterbrechung, sie können über ihn hinausdenken. Wir aber sind von ihm ergriffen worden und wissen nicht, wie das enden soll.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 171-173</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Wir lernten, daß ein geputzter Knopf wichtiger ist als vier Bände Schopenhauer. Zuerst erstaunt, dann erbittert und schließlich gleichgültig erkannten wir, daß nicht der Geist ausschlaggebend zu sein schien, sondern die Wichsbürste, nicht der Gedanke, sondern das System, nicht die Freiheit, sondern der Drill.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 184-187</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Er liegt eine Zeitlang still. Dann sagt er:»Du kannst meine Schnürschuhe für Müller mitnehmen.« Ich nicke und denke nach, was ich ihm Aufmunterndes sagen kann. Seine Lippen sind weggewischt, sein Mund ist größer geworden, die Zähne stechen hervor, als wären sie aus Kreide. Das Fleisch zerschmilzt, die Stirn wölbt sich stärker, die Backenknochen stehen vor. Das Skelett arbeitet sich durch. Die Augen versinken schon. In ein paar Stunden wird es vorbei sein.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 245-248</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Eine Stunde vergeht. Ich sitze gespannt und beobachte jede seiner Mienen, ob er vielleicht noch etwas sagen möchte. Wenn er doch den Mund auftun und schreien wollte! Aber er weint nur, den Kopf zur Seite gewandt. Er spricht nicht von seiner Mutter und seinen Geschwistern, er sagt nichts, es liegt wohl schon hinter ihm; – er ist jetzt allein mit seinem kleinen neunzehnjährigen Leben und weint, weil es ihn verläßt.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 270-273</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Die Abschüsse sind deutlich zu hören. Es sind die englischen Batterien, rechts von unserm Abschnitt. Sie beginnen eine Stunde zu früh. Bei uns fingen sie immer erst Punkt zehn Uhr an. »Was fällt denn denen ein«, ruft Müller,»ihre Uhren gehen wohl vor.«&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 441-442</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Wenn Kat vor den Baracken steht und sagt:»Es gibt Kattun -«, so ist das eben seine Meinung, fertig; – wenn er es aber hier sagt, so hat der Satz eine Schärfe wie ein Bajonett nachts im Mond, er schneidet glatt durch die Gedanken, er ist näher und spricht zu diesem Unbewußten, das in uns aufgewacht ist, mit einer dunklen Bedeutung,»es gibt Kattun«-.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 452-454</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Es ist das andere gewesen, diese hellsichtige Witterung in uns, die uns niedergerissen und gerettet hat, ohne daß man weiß, wie. Wenn sie nicht wäre, gäbe es von Flandern bis zu den Vogesen schon längst keine Menschen mehr.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 468-469</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Das sind die verwundeten Pferde. Aber nicht alle. Einige galoppieren weiter entfernt, brechen nieder und rennen weiter. Einem ist der Bauch aufgerissen, die Gedärme hängen lang heraus. Es verwickelt sich darin und stürzt, doch es steht wieder auf.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 530-532</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Das letzte stemmt sich auf die Vorderbeine und dreht sich im Kreise wie ein Karussell, sitzend dreht es sich auf den hochgestemmten Vorderbeinen im Kreise, wahrscheinlich ist der Rücken zerschmettert. Der Soldat rennt hin und schießt es nieder. Langsam, demütig rutscht es zu Boden.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 538-540</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Der Zaun ist verwüstet, die Schienen der Feldbahn drüben sind aufgerissen, sie starren hochgebogen in die Luft.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 601-602</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Der Junge wird den Transport kaum überstehen, und höchstens kann es noch einige Tage mit ihm dauern. Alles bisher aber wird nichts sein gegen diese Zeit, bis er stirbt. Jetzt ist er noch betäubt und fühlt nichts. In einer Stunde wird er ein kreischendes Bündel unerträglicher Schmerzen werden. Die Tage, die er noch leben kann, bedeuten für ihn eine einzige rasende Qual. Und wem nützt es, ob er sie noch hat oder nicht – Ich nicke. »Ja, Kat, man sollte einen Revolver nehmen.«&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 614-617</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Monoton pendeln die Wagen, monoton sind die Rufe, monoton rinnt der Regen. Er rinnt auf unsere Köpfe und auf die Köpfe der Toten vorn, auf den Körper des kleinen Rekruten mit der Wunde, die viel zu groß für seine Hüfte ist, er rinnt auf das Grab Kemmerichs, er rinnt auf unsere Herzen.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 628-630</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Aber niemand hat uns in der Schule beigebracht, wie man bei Regen und Sturm eine Zigarette anzündet, wie man ein Feuer aus nassem Holz machen kann – oder daß man ein Bajonett am besten in den Bauch stößt, weil es da nicht festklemmt wie bei den Rippen.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 715-717</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Kropp denkt ebenfalls darüber nach. »Es wird überhaupt schwer werden mit uns allen. Ob die sich in der Heimat eigentlich nicht manchmal Sorgen machen deswegen? Zwei Jahre Schießen und Handgranaten – das kann man doch nicht ausziehen wie einen Strumpf nachher.«&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 732-734</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Wir sind zwei Menschen, zwei winzige Funken Leben, draußen ist die Nacht und der Kreis des Todes. Wir sitzen an ihrem Rande, gefährdet und geborgen, […]&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 797-798</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Auch die andern machen Witze, unbehagliche Witze, was sollen wir sonst tun. – Die Särge sind ja tatsächlich für uns. In solchen Dingen klappt die Organisation.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 827-828</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Die Front ist ein Käfig, in dem man nervös warten muß auf das, was geschehen wird. Wir liegen unter dem Gitter der Granatenbogen und leben in der Spannung des Ungewissen.Über uns schwebt der Zufall. Wenn ein Geschoß kommt, kann ich mich ducken, das ist alles; wohin es schlägt, kann ich weder genau wissen noch beeinflussen. Dieser Zufall ist es, der uns gleichgültig macht.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 835-838</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Jeder Soldat bleibt nur durch tausend Zufälle am Leben. Und jeder Soldat glaubt und vertraut dem Zufall.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 842-842</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Nach wenigen Minuten hören wir das erste Schlurfen und Zerren. Es verstärkt sich, nun sind es viele kleine Füße. Da blitzen die Taschenlampen auf, und alles schlägt auf den schwarzen Haufen ein, der auseinanderzischt. Der Erfolg ist gut. Wir schaufeln die Rattenteile über den Grabenrand und legen uns wieder auf die Lauer. Noch einige Male gelingt uns der Schlag. Dann haben die Tiere etwas gemerkt oder das Blut gerochen. Sie kommen nicht mehr.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 852-855</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Ich stürze hinter dem Flüchtenden her und überlege, ob ich ihm in die Beine schießen soll; – da pfeift es heran, ich werfe mich hin, und als ich aufstehe, ist die Grabenwand mit heißen Splittern, Fleischfetzen und Uniformlappen bepflastert. Ich klettere zurück.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 929-930</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Noch eine Nacht. Wir sind jetzt stumpf vor Spannung. Es ist eine tödliche Spannung, die wie ein schartiges Messer unser Rückenmark entlang kratzt. Die Beine wollen nicht mehr, die Hände zittern, der Körper ist eine dünne Haut über mühsam unterdrücktem Wahnsinn, über einem gleich hemmungslos ausbrechendem Gebrüll ohne Ende.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 935-937</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Die Nacht kommt, aus den Trichtern steigen Nebel. Es sieht aus, als wären die Löcher von gespenstigen Geheimnissen erfüllt. Der weiße Dunst kriecht angstvoll umher, ehe er wagt, über den Rand hinwegzugleiten. Dann ziehen lange Streifen von Trichter zu Trichter.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 1003-1005</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Und selbst wenn man sie uns wiedergäbe, diese Landschaft unserer Jugend, wir würden wenig mehr mit ihr anzufangen wissen. Die zarten und geheimen Kräfte, die von ihr zu uns gingen, können nicht wiedererstehen. Wir würden in ihr sein und in ihr umgehen; wir würden uns erinnern und sie lieben und bewegt sein von ihrem Anblick. Aber es wäre das gleiche, wie wenn wir nachdenklich werden vor der Fotografie eines toten Kameraden; es sind seine Züge, es ist sein Gesicht, und die Tage, die wir mit ihm zusammen waren, gewinnen ein trügerisches Leben in unserer Erinnerung; aber er ist es nicht selbst.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 1033-1037</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Die Tage sind heiß, und die Toten liegen unbeerdigt. Wir können sie nicht alle holen, wir wissen nicht, wohin wir mit ihnen sollen. Sie werden von den Granaten beerdigt. Manchen treiben die Bäuche auf wie Ballons. Sie zischen, rülpsen und bewegen sich. Das Gas rumort in ihnen. Der Himmel ist blau und ohne Wolken. Abends wird es schwül, und die Hitze steigt aus der Erde. Wenn der Wind zu uns herüberweht, bringt er den Blutdunst mit, der schwer und widerwärtig süßlich ist, diesen Totenbrodem der Trichter, der aus Chloroform und Verwesung gemischt scheint und uns Übelkeiten und Erbrechen verursacht.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 1070-1074</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Der Stellungskampf von heute erfordert Kenntnisse und Erfahrungen, man muß Verständnis für das Gelände haben, man muß die Geschosse, ihre Geräusche und Wirkungen im Ohr haben, man muß vorausbestimmen können, wo sie einbauen, wie sie streuen und wie man sich schützt. Dieser junge Ersatz weiß natürlich von alledem noch fast gar nichts.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 1104-1106</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Er wird aufgerieben, weil er kaum ein Schrapnell von einer Granate unterscheiden kann, die Leute werden weggemäht, weil sie angstvoll auf das Heulen der ungefährlichen großen, weit hinten einhauenden Kohlenkästen lauschen und das pfeifende, leise Surren der flach zerspritzenden kleinen Biester überhören.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 1106-1108</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Sie tragen ihre grauen Röcke und Hosen und Stiefel, aber den meisten ist die Uniform zu weit, sie schlottert um die Glieder, die Schultern sind zu schmal, die Körper sind zu gering, es gab keine Uniformen, die für dieses Kindermaß eingerichtet waren.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 1114-1116</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Haie Westhus wird mit abgerissenem Rücken fortgeschleppt; bei jedem Atemzug pulst die Lunge durch die Wunde. Ich kann ihm noch die Hand drücken; -»is alle, Paul«, stöhnt er und beißt sich vor Schmerz in die Arme.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 1146-1147</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Alles ist Gewohnheit, auch der Schützengraben. Diese Gewohnheit ist der Grund dafür, daß wir scheinbar so rasch vergessen. Vorgestern waren wir noch im Feuer, heute machen wir Albernheiten und fechten uns durch die Gegend, morgen gehen wir wieder in den Graben.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 1175-1176</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Das Grauen der Front versinkt, wenn wir ihm den Rücken kehren, wir gehen ihm mit gemeinen und grimmigen Witzen zuleibe; wenn jemand stirbt, dann heißt es, daß er den Arsch zugekniffen hat, und so reden wir über alles, das rettet uns vor dem Verrücktwerden, solange wir es so nehmen, leisten wir Widerstand.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 1188-1190</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Und ich weiß: all das, was jetzt, solange wir im Kriege sind, versackt in uns wie ein Stein, wird nach dem Kriege wieder aufwachen, und dann beginnt erst die Auseinandersetzung auf Leben und Tod.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 1193-1194</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Wir trinken Punsch und lügen uns phantastische Erlebnisse vor. Jeder glaubt dem andern gern und wartet ungeduldig, um noch dicker aufzutrumpfen.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 1239-1240</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Mutter, was soll ich dir darauf antworten! Du wirst es nicht verstehen und nie begreifen. Du sollst es auch nie begreifen. War es schlimm, fragst du. – Du, Mutter. – Ich schüttele den Kopf und sage:»Nein, Mutter, nicht so sehr. Wir sind ja mit vielen zusammen, da ist es nicht so schlimm.«&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 1376-1378</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Nachdem ich mich auf der Straße ein paarmal erschreckt habe, weil das Quietschen der Straßenbahnen sich wie heranheulende Granaten anhört, klopft mir jemand auf die Schulter.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 1416-1418</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Ich hätte nie hierherkommen dürfen. Ich war gleichgültig und oft hoffnungslos draußen; – ich werde es nie mehr so sein können. Ich war ein Soldat, und nun bin ich nichts mehr als Schmerz um mich, um meine Mutter, um alles, was so trostlos und ohne Ende ist. Ich hätte nie auf Urlaub fahren dürfen.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 1586-1588</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Dieses dünne, trübe, schmutzige Wasser ist das Ziel der Gefangenen. Sie schöpfen es gierig aus den stinkenden Tonnen und tragen es unter ihren Blusen fort.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 1611-1612</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Ein Befehl hat diese stillen Gestalten zu unsern Feinden gemacht; ein Befehl könnte sie in unsere Freunde verwandeln. An irgendeinem Tisch wird ein Schriftstück von einigen Leuten unterzeichnet, die keiner von uns kennt, und jahrelang ist unser höchstes Ziel das, worauf sonst die Verachtung der Welt und ihre höchste Strafe ruht.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 1644-1646</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;»Ja, nun«, meint Albert, und ich sehe ihm an, daß er mich in die Enge treiben will,</p>
<p>&ldquo;»aber unsere Professoren und Pastöre und Zeitungen sagen, nur wir hätten recht, und das wird ja hoffentlich auch so sein; – aber die französischen Professoren und Pastöre und Zeitungen behaupten, nur sie hätten recht, wie steht es denn damit?«&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 1722-1724</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;»Weshalb ist dann überhaupt Krieg?« fragt Tjaden.<br>
Kat zuckt die Achseln. »Es muß Leute geben, denen der Krieg nützt.«<br>
»Na, ich gehöre nicht dazu«, grinst Tjaden. <br>
»Du nicht, und keiner hier.« <br>
»Wer denn nur?« beharrte Tjaden. »Dem Kaiser nützt er doch auch nicht. Der hat doch alles, was er braucht.«&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 1737-1740</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Das Ganze kann nicht lange her sein, das Blut ist noch frisch. Da alle Leute, die wir sehen, tot sind, lassen wir uns nicht aufhalten, sondern melden die Sache bei der nächsten Sanitätsstation. Schließlich ist es ja auch nicht unsere Angelegenheit, diesen Tragbahrenhengsten die Arbeit abzunehmen.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 1763-1765</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Immer noch habe ich Angst, aber es ist eine vernünftige Angst, eine außerordentlich gesteigerte Vorsicht. Die Nacht ist windig, und Schatten gehen hin und her beim Aufflackern des Mündungsfeuers. Man sieht dadurch zu wenig und zu viel.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 1801-1802</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Klirren wird hörbar. Ein einzelner Schrei gellend dazwischen.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 1827-1828</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Der Tote hätte sicher noch dreißig Jahre leben können, wenn ich mir den Rückweg schärfer eingeprägt hätte. Wenn er zwei Meter weiter nach links gelaufen wäre, läge er jetzt drüben im Graben und schriebe einen neuen Brief an seine Frau.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 1890-1891</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;»Kamerad, ich wollte dich nicht töten. Sprängst du noch einmal hier hinein, ich täte es nicht, wenn auch du vernünftig wärest. Aber du warst mir vorher nur ein Gedanke, eine Kombination, die in meinem Gehirn lebte und einen Entschluß hervorrief – diese Kombination habe ich erstochen. Jetzt sehe ich erst, daß du ein Mensch bist wie ich. Ich habe gedacht an deine Handgranaten, an dein Bajonett und deine Waffen – jetzt sehe ich deine Frau und dein Gesicht und das Gemeinsame. Vergib mir, Kamerad! Wir sehen es immerzu spät. Warum sagt man uns nicht immer wieder, daß ihr ebenso arme Hunde seid wie wir, daß eure Mütter sich ebenso ängstigen wie unsere und daß wir die gleiche Furcht vor dem Tode haben und das gleiche Sterben und den gleichen Schmerz -. Vergib mir, Kamerad, wie konntest du mein Feind sein. Wenn wir diese Waffen und diese Uniform fortwerfen, könntest du ebenso mein Bruder sein wie Kat und Albert. Nimm zwanzig Jahre von mir, Kamerad, und stehe auf – nimm mehr, denn ich weiß nicht, was ich damit beginnen soll.«&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 1893-1900</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Ich habe den Buchdrucker Gérard Duval getötet. Ich muß Buchdrucker werden, denke ich ganz verwirrt, Buchdrucker werden, Buchdrucker&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 1919-1920</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Doch das Pufferbacken wird jetzt schwieriger. Die Einschläge kommen so dicht, daß oft und öfter die Splitter gegen die Hauswand klatschen und durch die Fenster fegen. Jedesmal, wenn ich ein Ding heranpfeifen höre, gehe ich mit der Pfanne und den Puffern in die Knie und ducke mich hinter die Fenstermauer. Sofort danach bin ich wieder hoch und backe weiter.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 1986-1989</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Zwischen uns steht ein Papageienkäfig, den wir für die Katze gefunden haben. Sie wird mitgenommen und liegt drinnen vor ihrem Fleischnapf und schnurrt. Langsam rollen die Wagen über die Straße. Wir singen. Hinter uns spritzen die Granaten Fontänen aus dem nun ganz verlassenen Dorf.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 2023-2025</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Ihre Gestalten sind gebeugt, ihre Gesichter voll Kummer, Verzweiflung, Hast und Ergebenheit. Die Kinder hängen an den Händen der Mütter, manchmal führt auch ein älteres Mädchen die Kleinen, die vorwärts taumeln und immer wieder zurücksehen. Einige tragen armselige Puppen mit sich. Alle schweigen, als sie an uns vorübergehen.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 2027-2029</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Ich kann noch etwas kriechen und rufe einen vorüberfahrenden Leiterwagen an, der uns mitnimmt. Er ist voller Verwundeter. Ein Sanitätsgefreiter ist dabei, der uns eine Tetanusspritze in die Brust jagt.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 2046-2047</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Im Stockwerk tiefer liegen Bauch- und Rückenmarkschüsse, Kopfschüsse und beiderseitig Amputierte. Rechts im Flügel Kieferschüsse, Gaskranke, Nasen-, Ohren- und Halsschüsse. Links im Flügel Blinde und Lungenschüsse, Beckenschüsse, Gelenkschüsse, Nierenschüsse, Hodenschüsse, Magenschüsse. Man sieht hier erst, wo ein Mensch überall getroffen werden kann.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 2217-2219</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;[…] wir sind kleine Flammen, notdürftig geschützt durch schwache Wände vor dem Sturm der Auflösung und der Sinnlosigkeit, in dem wir flackern und manchmal fast ertrinken. Dann wird das gedämpfte Brausen der Schlacht zu einem Ring, der uns einschließt, wir kriechen in uns zusammen und starren mit großen Augen in die Nacht.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 2308-2311</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Unser Maschinengewehr bestreicht den vorderen Halbkreis. Das Kühlwasser verdampft, wir reichen die Kästen eilig herum, jeder pißt hinein, so haben wir wieder Wasser und können weiterfeuern.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 2336-2338</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Wir haben Müller zwar begraben können, aber lange wird er wohl nicht ungestört bleiben. Unsere Linien werden zurückgenommen. Es gibt drüben zu viele frische englische und amerikanische Regimenter. Es gibt zuviel Corned beef und weißes Weizenmehl. Und zuviel neue Geschütze. Zuviel Flugzeuge.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 2352-2353</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Wir aber sind mager und ausgehungert. Unser Essen ist so schlecht und mit so viel Ersatzmitteln gestreckt, daß wir krank davon werden. Die Fabrikbesitzer in Deutschland sind reiche Leute geworden – uns zerschrinnt die Ruhr die Därme. Die Latrinenstangen sind stets dicht gehockt voll; – man sollte den Leuten zu Hause diese grauen, gelben, elenden, ergebenen Gesichter hier zeigen, diese verkrümmten Gestalten, denen die Kolik das Blut aus dem Leibe quetscht und die höchstens mit verzerrten, noch schmerz-bebenden Lippen sich angrinsen:»Es hat gar keinen Zweck, die Hose wieder hochzuziehen -«&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 2354-2358</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Unsere frischen Truppen sind blutarme, erholungsbedürftige Knaben, die keinen Tornister tragen können, aber zu sterben wissen. Zu Tausenden. Sie verstehen nichts vom Kriege, sie gehen nur vor und lassen sich abschießen. Ein einziger Flieger knallte aus Spaß zwei Kompanien von ihnen weg, ehe sie etwas von Deckung wußten, als sie frisch aus dem Zuge kamen.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 2359-2361</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;»Deutschland muß bald leer sein«, sagt Kat.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 2361-2362</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;Kat erzählt eine der Geschichten, die die ganze Front von den Vogesen bis Flandern entlanglaufen, – von dem Stabsarzt, der Namen vorliest auf der Musterung und, wenn der Mann vortritt, ohne aufzusehen, sagt:</p>
<p>&ldquo;»K. v. Wir brauchen Soldaten draußen.«</p>
<p>&ldquo;Ein Mann mit Holzbein tritt vor, der Stabsarzt sagt wieder: k.v.</p>
<p>&ldquo;-»Und da«, Kat hebt die Stimme,»sagt der Mann zu ihm: ›Ein Holzbein habe ich schon; aber wenn ich jetzt hinausgehe und wenn man mir den Kopf abschießt, dann lasse ich mir einen Holzkopf machen und werde Stabsarzt!‹«&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 2365-2369</div></div><p>This is like the story of the doctor on the witness stand who&rsquo;s asked whether his patient, whose head had been chopped off, was still capable. He responded that he supposed the corpse still had the wherewithal to become a lawyer.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Wir sind nicht geschlagen, denn wir sind als Soldaten besser und erfahrener; wir sind einfach von der vielfachen Übermacht zerdrückt und zurückgeschoben.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 2407-2408</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Die Gewehre verkrusten, die Uniformen verkrusten, alles ist fließend und aufgelöst, eine triefende, feuchte, ölige Masse Erde, in der die gelben Tümpel mit spiralig roten Blutlachen stehen und Tote, Verwundete und Überlebende langsam versinken.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 2410-2412</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Kat hat, ohne daß ich es bemerkt habe, unterwegs einen Splitter in den Kopf bekommen. Nur ein kleines Loch ist da, es muß ein ganz geringer, verirrter Splitter gewesen sein. Aber er hat ausgereicht. Kat ist tot.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 2448-2449</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Er fiel im Oktober 1918, an einem Tage, der so ruhig und still war an der ganzen Front, daß der Heeresbericht sich nur auf den Satz beschränkte, im Westen sei nichts Neues zu melden.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 2473-2474</div></div>      </div>
      </div>
        <div class="footer">
    <div class="footer-data"><div class="footer-links"><ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/contact.php" title="">Contact</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/support.php" title="">Support</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/privacy.php" title="">Privacy</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/rights.php" title="">Rights</a></li></ul></div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="copyright">Copyright (c) 1999-2026 earthli.com. All Rights Reserved.</div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="versions">Powered by <ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore/app_news.php">earthli News 3.7</a></li><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore" title="">earthli WebCore&trade; 3.7</a></li></ul></div></div>    </div>
      </div>
  </div>  </body>
</html>
]]>
  </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
      <title type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[Bullet Points and Punch Lines by Lee Camp (2020; read in 2020)]]>
  </title>
    <id>https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=4037</id>
    <link href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=4037"/>
    <updated>2021-01-02T18:09:39+01:00</updated>
    <author>
        <name type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[Marco von Ballmoos]]>
  </name>
      <uri>https://earthli.com/users/marco</uri>
    </author>
      <summary type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<blockquote class="quote abstract "><div>Disclaimer: these are notes I took while reading this book. They include citations I found interesting or enlightening or particularly well-written. In some cases, I&rsquo;ve pointed out which of these applies to which citation; in others, I have not. Any benefit you gain from reading these notes is... [<a class="complete-text-link" href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=4037">More</a>]</div></blockquote>]]>
  </summary>
      <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<html lang="en">
  <head>
    <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/themes/ice.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/fonts/raleway.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/core/medium.css">
  </head>
  <body>
<div class="style-controls">  <div class="page">
    <div class="page-body">
<div class="info-box-top">
<p>
Published by <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_user.php?name=marco" title="Marco von Ballmoos" class="visible">marco</a> on <span class="date-time">2. Jan 2021 18:09:39 (GMT-5)</span>
</p>
</div>
      <div class="text-flow wide">
  <blockquote class="quote abstract "><div>Disclaimer: these are notes I took while reading this book. They include citations I found interesting or enlightening or particularly well-written. In some cases, I&rsquo;ve pointed out which of these applies to which citation; in others, I have not. Any benefit you gain from reading these notes is purely incidental to the purpose they serve of reminding me what I once read. Please see Wikipedia for a summary if I&rsquo;ve failed to provide one sufficient for your purposes. If my notes serve to trigger an interest in this book, then I&rsquo;m happy for you.</div></blockquote><p>This is a collection of essays by American political activist, comedian, writer, podcaster, and TV-show host Lee Camp. The foreword is written by no less an eminence than Chris Hedges himself, who is a fan of Camp&rsquo;s work. The introduction is by Jimmy Dore, another comedian who&rsquo;s hosted Hedges on his show several times. They are all good people on the right side of history, with good principles, good research, and strong writing skills.</p>
<p>I&rsquo;ve followed Hedges assiduously for years and recently been quite impressed with Jimmy Dore&rsquo;s YouTube channel. Hedges is scathing in his condemnation of the American political landscape, as is Dore. As is Camp.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;And, as Camp points out, the Democratic Party is as complicit in this debacle as the Republican Party. There is no way at this level to separate Trump from Obama. One may be vulgar and brash, but the other uses urbane polish to accomplish the same ends.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 10 by <cite>Chris Hedges</cite></div></div><p>I&rsquo;ve been a fan of Lee Camp&rsquo;s work for a long time—at least a decade, if not more. I started following and supporting him a long time ago, when he just had his original <em>Moment of Clarity</em> podcast (which he still does, but now on YouTube). I even took a long weekend in Berlin once to catch a rare European show. He&rsquo;s had his own TV show called <em>Redacted Tonight</em> for several years now, in which he regularly delivers hard-hitting and well-crafted news and polemics.</p>
<p>He started out as a stand-up comedian and still does that. But he&rsquo;s very much grown beyond that—becoming a well-spoken and often sardonic and hilarious voice for the downtrodden and for justice.</p>
<p>This is a book of essays that he&rsquo;s published over the years. As you progress through the essays, you can follow along as he finds his voice. The first few essays are on interesting topics, but are a bit heavy on jokes and somewhat forced analogies. They&rsquo;re not <em>bad</em> but they&rsquo;re not nearly as good as those in the second half of the book. The book illustrates Camp&rsquo;s writing style as it progresses from stand-up-comedy-like lines to truly insightful and cutting satire more akin to that of Matt Taibbi.</p>
<p>As the book is a collection of essays, the rest of my review simply chains together citations to give an impression of the scope.</p>
<p>Camp&rsquo;s final word on Donald Trump&rsquo;s place in the pantheon of U.S.-inspired misery is a good place to start. Trump is unexceptional, a symptom rather than the cause.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;I don’t believe Trump is the cause of our country’s main problems. I believe he is a symptom of an incredibly corrupt corporate-ruled system. He is a horrible and rather—not bright—man, but he is not the cause of the millions of hungry and homeless and imprisoned in our country. He is not the cause of the flaws in our democracy and our media. He is just the pimple that has risen up.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 223</div></div><h3>The U.S. Military &amp; Foreign Policy</h3><p>Camp&rsquo;s first essays deal with the astronomical military budget, which continues to grow unchecked, to the detriment of all other societal need.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;[…] a country that can vomit trillions of dollars down a black hole marked “military” can’t find the money to take care of our poor elderly.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 17</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The Pentagon’s accounting fraud diverts many billions of dollars that could be devoted to other national needs: health care, education, job creation, climate action, infrastructure modernization, and more. Indeed, the Pentagon’s accounting fraud amounts to theft on a grand scale—theft not only from America’s taxpayers, but also from the nation’s well-being and its future.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 33</div></div><p>It would be bad enough were the money misappropriated by people who honestly thought it was better put to use in the military. Their duplicity in appropriation and distribution makes it very clear that they are just using the military as a politically unassailable vehicle to which to attach their own ambitions—for graft, money, and power.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Have no fear, patriotic Americans, this is not “lying to the American people, stealing their money, and using it for war,” this is just “unsubstantiated change actions.” Try that on your next tax return. Put in 10 thousand dollars marked “unsubstantiated change actions.” I’m sure they’ll love that.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 58</div></div><p>Other essays discuss what the military actually <em>does</em>, which is enforce capitalism throughout its empire, beating down all resistance. The biggest crime a country could be guilty of, in the eyes of the U.S.?</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Being socialist. Pretty self-explanatory. If you don’t have the same economic system as we do, we treat it like you have candy, and we’re not allowed to have any, so we slip razor blades in yours and tell everyone your candy kills people.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 61</div></div><p>As I&rsquo;ve noted, Camp has quite a way with words. His descriptions of U.S. foreign policy are succinct, darkly funny, accurate, and complete.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The absolute last thing [Venezuelans] need is to be turned into a neocon/neoliberal parking lot in which America rips all their resources out from under them while calling it “freedom.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 68</div></div><h3>Animal Rights &amp; The Environment </h3><p>From there, he moves on to animal rights and the imperative of vegetarianism, both for moral and environmental reasons.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;We have food. We have year-round ripe mangos that don’t even make natural sense. There’s no need to keep 280 million hens and 68 million pigs in a fucking Saw movie.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 87</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;[The mainstream media&rsquo;s job is to] make you think we live in a system that can recover from this carnage without large-scale changes, without a new economic paradigm that doesn’t reward waste and planned obsolescence and profiting off the lives of others.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 96</div></div><p>It&rsquo;s hard to know where to begin with saving the environment. Nearly everything we do right now is going in the wrong direction—and nearly everyone else we know actively benefits from this system—in the short term. In the long term, we&rsquo;re all dead. It&rsquo;s what our lives look like in the medium-term is where it gets interesting. We&rsquo;re mortgaging our future six ways to Sunday, burning the candle not only at both ends, but in the middle in a couple of spots too. Those in power benefit; many others get short-term benefits, enough of them that it becomes nearly impossible to turn this boat around. Maybe we just can&rsquo;t.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;Maybe we’re right to die off. Maybe our hubris and egos the size of SUVs have doomed us, and we should just give up and enjoy our final few years. But if that’s the case, I would like an announcement. I would honestly prefer a national address by some of our so-called leaders stating clearly,</p>
<p>&ldquo;“Look, folks, to continue civilized society of the human species, we would need to change everything. <strong>Every single one of us would have to labor toward a massive shift to a sustainable culture that works in harmony with nature rather than abusing nature</strong> like it’s a servant who gave us an ugly look. We would have to focus on achieving this new society rather than spending a third of our free time watching superhero movies. <strong>But we have no intention of doing that because it sounds kinda hard, not to mention that corporate profits would suffer in the short term.</strong> So instead, we’re declaring here and now that we’ll all just keep functioning as is until such time as the oceans turn to acid, the ever-growing storms consume us, and California feels like the inside of a kiln. According to our best minds, that will be 10 to 20 years from now, so don’t worry about starting that retirement fund. Don’t buy the extended warranty on that vacuum. And whatever you do, at no point and under no circumstances should you quit smoking and drinking…. Thank you, and good night.”&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 100</div></div><h3>Racism &amp; The Police State</h3><p>Camp gets the right argument about police violence. We get distracted because there are way <em>more</em> violent things, so it&rsquo;s easier to point out all of the things that are more dangerous than the police. Deaths caused by police are just the tip of the iceberg of oppression, though. False arrests, cash bail, harassment, and so on, all impact lives to arguably a greater degree.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Yes, it is true that cops kill a lot of white people. They kill more white people than Wendy’s trademarked Baconator sandwich. However, cops kill more people of color than the population percentages would dictate, and they’re more likely to kill people of color who aren’t armed. So while whites do lose their lives in our current police state at a ridiculous rate, they are far more likely to be waving around a gun when it happens.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 164</div></div><p>He also gets it right when he points out that racism <em>exacerbates</em> the underlying anti-poverty stance and inequality. It&rsquo;s a class issue. The police end up working for their real masters no matter where they start out on the ideological scale.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;In this particular instance, systemic racism does not originate in race but in <strong>the way the rich have crafted our laws and our systems to favor the rich.</strong> So it’s a class issue rather than a race issue. Unfortunately, other factors of systemic racism—such as hiring practices and who gets promoted—ensure that white people are more likely to be extremely wealthy and less likely to be extremely poor. Therefore, our country has a racial wealth gap the size of the Grand Canyon&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 182</div></div><p>When you&rsquo;re rich, you make the rules that keep you rich and safe. All of those other animals haven&rsquo;t earned the right to be treated fairly the way rich people have.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;All told, much of our systemic racism problem comes down to class and wealth, not just race. But race, class, and wealth are deeply, inexorably linked. And therefore, whether you choose to ignore it or not, we must acknowledge that systemic racism is a thing. It’s in our schools, our air, our water, and even our televisions. It impacts every area of our lives, and much like climate change, we need to start fixing it rather than acting like it doesn’t exist.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 184</div></div><h3>The Economy &amp; Inequality</h3><p>The stock market is essentially gambling and the house always wins. If you&rsquo;re winning, it&rsquo;s because you&rsquo;re squeezing a profit out of some idiot who probably could afford to lose that money a lot less than you needed to win it.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;I would actually respect the whole system if right on the front of the stock exchange it said, </p>
<p>&ldquo;“Put your money into the stock market! The only way you’ll make more money is if you find a dolt to buy whatever stocks you just bought. But there are an infinite number of dolts! <strong>This gravy train is powered by morons. So you have nothing to worry about.</strong>”&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 104</div></div><p>The market is rigged and the only way to really win is to be the house, as with any other gambling establishment.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Step two is to realize that the market economy in general is designed to exploit billions of us while a tiny number get ridiculously rich. It doesn’t care about the health or sustainability of our society as it facilitates the extraction of all the wealth and resources by sociopaths. Just ask Jeff Bezos—<strong>he’s now worth 150 billion padoodles of Amazon stock, while his workers are on food stamps.</strong>&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 107</div></div><p>For example, the pharmaceutical industry has incentive <em>not</em> to cure diseases with simple and cheap one-time vaccines if they already have a lucrative business selling treatments for the same disease. If we leave everything up to the market, these businesses will logically decide that it&rsquo;s more profitable to sell suffering patients decades worth of drugs instead. We only listen to the opinion of these businesses and have been trained to think that the government, that society—with its vast resources and wealth—has no say.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;They aren’t even trying to cure infectious diseases that make them piles of cash. Instead, the moneyed interests are complaining to their clients that they need to avoid curing these diseases. Because not only do they lose money on the patient who no longer needs meds, <strong>they also lose money because that patient won’t pass the disease onto others.</strong>&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 111</div></div><p>Market incentives are completely screwed up. The market provides those things that people who already have money think will make them the most amount of more money. We don&rsquo;t need to go all the way to a planned economy, but this is nearly the furthest thing from it. We just keep throwing money at rich people and hope that something useful for society comes out of it. It rarely does. It&rsquo;s only with concerted <em>planning</em> and <em>regulation</em> and <em>oversight</em> that we can actually get what <em>we</em> want. That gets in the way of them getting what <em>they</em> want.</p>
<p>We run the whole economy of the world just as poorly as we run any other project. And, just like those poorly run projects, we have terrible oversight and nearly no useful telemetry, using metrics chosen by those already benefitting from a crooked system and pretending that it describes our society&rsquo;s health in any way realistic to all but the 1%. We measure economic health with the stock market; we compare countries only by GDP.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;How do we rate success? We look at gross domestic product—how much we’re producing. GDP doesn’t measure how many kids are drinking toxic water or breathing toxic air. It doesn’t measure how many dolphins are choking on plastic beer rings. It only measures how many beers you chug down. It doesn’t measure how many trees were planted. It measures how many trees we cut down to make the cardboard for coffee cups and condom boxes. It doesn’t rate how screwed the environment is, just how much stuff we buy to keep screwing. <strong>Buy a dildo? Good for the economy. Throw an old dildo out? Ends up in the ocean, gets stuck in a whale’s blowhole. GDP doesn’t care.</strong>&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 130</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;<strong>GDP doesn’t measure how many animals went extinct. It only measures how many animals we ate or sold.</strong> You could be eating a bald eagle roasted with giraffe bacon wrapped around it. As long as you bought it at the store, it’s good for GDP.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 131</div></div><p>GDP is a poor metric, and so is the stock market. Its macro-economic performance has long since become divorced from the economy most people experience. It&rsquo;s become more obvious than ever in 2020 that the stock market has no macro-economic importance. It matters, of course, to the elite, who are busy stuffing their track-suits full of leaves. [1] </p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The Post acts as if Wall Street’s growth is somehow good for average Americans. It’s not. Trump, Hillary, and the Post are all part of an elite class enjoying the spoils of a fully exploited working class. <strong>Judging the health of our society by looking at stock prices is like judging the health of a dying man by looking at the leeches on his skin.</strong> “Wow, those leeches are very happy. This man is in peak condition!”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 207</div></div><p>The only thing fantastical about the following little parable is that is assumes the existence of aliens. The rest is accurate.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>Imagine the aliens that come down here after we’ve eaten everything, killed everything, and turned it all to dust. Imagine them showing up and going, </p>
<p>“What happened to those little fellows that used to be here?”</p>
<p>“Well, they imagined something called the stock market, where nonliving entities called corporations compete to see which one can exploit the earth the most. It eventually swallowed up the whole biosphere they lived in.”</p>
<p>“Oh, which corporation won?”</p>
<p>“Ironically, the one called Amazon, <strong>which used to be the name of the largest river in the world, until they paved it.</strong>”</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 132</div></div><p>This split society—the eternal &ldquo;haves&rdquo; and &ldquo;have nots&rdquo;—leads to jarring conclusions. One is that, in making a judgment on whether something is bad or good for society, you must always be careful to consider <em>for whom</em>.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;It&rsquo;s like a guy driving a car and only seeing speed, being completely blind to how many people he runs down. He’d get to his destination in record time and say to the townspeople, who all had family members run over by this maniac, “We did it. I got here in record time. We should all celebrate together.” <strong>One percent of America is celebrating. It’s time to do things differently.</strong>&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 133</div></div><p>There is a relatively small group in our society that benefits massively from policies that are detrimental to the overwhelming majority. It&rsquo;s not as cut-and-dried as deciding on the right policy. We have to somehow scam this minority, this elite, into implementing it <em>against their own best interests</em>. Either that, or we seize the reins of power from them. We&rsquo;ve tried the first way for a while; maybe it&rsquo;s time to try the second.</p>
<p><hr></p>
<div class="footnote-reference"><span id="footnote_DRAFTABLE_ENTRY_4037_1_body" class="footnote-number">[1]</span> <p>I refer here to the story in <em>The Restaurant at the End of the Universe</em> about our likely progenitors, the <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_The_Hitchhiker%27s_Guide_to_the_Galaxy_characters#Golgafrinchans">Golgafrinchans</a>, whose ark crash-landed on Earth long ago. They were on Ark Fleet Ship B—housing the most useless elements of society—with A and C to follow. It was clear they weren&rsquo;t going to do so and that the A and C denizens had dreamt up the story in order to get rid of the folks on Ark B.</p>
<p>After crash-landing, they lacked the niceties of society, like currency, so they decided to use leaves as <span class="quote-inline">&ldquo;legal tender&rdquo;</span> [2], making every one of them <span class="quote-inline">&ldquo;immensely rich&rdquo;</span>. They all walked around with track-suits stuffed full of leaves. The subsequent inflation problem led them to <span class="quote-inline">&ldquo;effectively revalue the leaf&rdquo;</span> by <span class="quote-inline">&ldquo;embark[ing] on a massive defoliation campaign, and…er, burn down all the forest.&rdquo;</span></p>
</div><div class="footnote-reference"><span id="footnote_DRAFTABLE_ENTRY_4037_2_body" class="footnote-number">[2]</span> All citations from page 299 of my leather-bound edition of the first four books of the at-that-time-only-slightly-inaccurately-named trilogy. [3]</div><div class="footnote-reference"><span id="footnote_DRAFTABLE_ENTRY_4037_3_body" class="footnote-number">[3]</span> Rather than the <span class="quote-inline">&ldquo;increasingly inaccurately named Hitchhiker&rsquo;s Trilogy&rdquo;</span> that is the epithet of the next book in the series, <em>Mostly Harmless</em>.</div><h2>Citations</h2><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;And, as Camp points out, the Democratic Party is as complicit in this debacle as the Republican Party. There is no way at this level to separate Trump from Obama. One may be vulgar and brash, but the other uses urbane polish to accomplish the same ends.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 10 by <cite>Chris Hedges</cite></div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Given that the entire Army budget in fiscal year 2015 was $120 billion, unsupported adjustments were 54 times the level of spending authorized by Congress.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 16</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Obviously, our government could do those things, but it chooses not to. Earlier this month, Louisiana sent eviction notices to 30 thousand elderly people on Medicaid, to kick them out of their nursing homes.11 Yes, a country that can vomit trillions of dollars down a black hole marked “military” can’t find the money to take care of our poor elderly.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 17</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Earlier this month, Louisiana sent eviction notices to 30 thousand elderly people on Medicaid, to kick them out of their nursing homes.11 Yes, a country that can vomit trillions of dollars down a black hole marked “military” can’t find the money to take care of our poor elderly. It’s a repulsive joke.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 17</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;So we use NED and USAID to destabilize countries. Keep in mind, though it may not sound like much, there are consequences to destabilizing countries. By doing so, we indirectly kill a lot of people, or at least ruin their lives, leaving them poor or destitute. But to create a successful coup, it’s important you don’t care about any of that stuff. Leave that for the nerds with their pencils and their statistics. If babies die because they can’t get the medical treatment they need, not your problem.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 23</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The Pentagon’s accounting fraud diverts many billions of dollars that could be devoted to other national needs: health care, education, job creation, climate action, infrastructure modernization, and more. Indeed, the Pentagon’s accounting fraud amounts to theft on a grand scale—theft not only from America’s taxpayers, but also from the nation’s well-being and its future.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 33</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;President Bashar Assad gassed his own people, thereby guaranteeing more American involvement—and he did it just days after Donald Trump had told the Pentagon to begin withdrawing troops from Syria. At least, that’s the story the corporate media repeated on loop for more than a month, only pausing every 10 minutes to try desperately to get us all to buy more things with “Baconator” in the name or to seek out a harder penis.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 41</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The propaganda line for Venezuela right now is: “We want to help the poor Venezuelans.” Well, if you want to help them, then keep America out of their face. Don’t force them to have anything to do with the country that came up with drive-through fried food served in a bucket and opioid nasal sprays. At no point does anyone look at the Donald Trump presidency and think, “Wow, that country really has things figured out. I hope they bring some of their great decision-making to our doorstep.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 43</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Have no fear, patriotic Americans, this is not “lying to the American people, stealing their money, and using it for war,” this is just “unsubstantiated change actions.” Try that on your next tax return. Put in 10 thousand dollars marked “unsubstantiated change actions.” I’m sure they’ll love that.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 58</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Being socialist. Pretty self-explanatory. If you don’t have the same economic system as we do, we treat it like you have candy, and we’re not allowed to have any, so we slip razor blades in yours and tell everyone your candy kills people.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 61</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The Venezuelan people deserve self-determination, no matter how you feel about the current government. The absolute last thing they need is to be turned into a neocon/neoliberal parking lot in which America rips all their resources out from under them while calling it “freedom.” Luckily, there are already many signs this US-created attempted coup is failing.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 68</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Under Trump, five bombs are dropped per hour—every hour of every day. That averages out to a bomb every 12 minutes. And which is more outrageous—the crazy amount of death and destruction we are creating around the world, or the fact that your mainstream corporate media basically NEVER investigates it? They talk about Trump’s flaws. They say he’s a racist, bulbous-headed, self-centered idiot (which is totally accurate)—but they don’t criticize the perpetual Amityville massacre our military perpetrates by dropping a bomb every 12 minutes, most of them killing 98 percent nontargets.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 80</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;We are a rogue nation with a rogue military and a completely unaccountable ruling elite. The government and military you and I support by being a part of this society are murdering people every 12 minutes, and, in response, there’s nothing but a ghostly silence. It is beneath us as a people and a species to give this topic nothing but silence. It is a crime against humanity.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 81</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;There’s no logic in voraciously continuing a behavior that will kill us in both the short and long term and doesn’t add up with our views toward animals. We have laws against animal abuse—as long as it’s one of the animals we’ve been socially engineered to protect. If you see someone smack a Labrador Retriever in public, you’ll dive in front of it like you’re the Secret Service taking a bullet for the president. But if you replace that dog with a pig or a lamb, then we all think, “Grill ’em up! What kind of sauce you got for that?”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 87</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;We have food. We have year-round ripe mangos that don’t even make natural sense. There’s no need to keep 280 million hens and 68 million pigs in a fucking Saw movie.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 87</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Acting like each year’s fires are a fluke that will never happen again—that, in and of itself, is denying climate change. It is lying to the American people in order to cover up the fact that we are promoting a system based on big oil, big factory farming, and big environmental destruction.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 94</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Are you starting to get the point? Kate Snow’s job—like most of those in mainstream media—is to cover up your reality. Her job is to make you think we live in a system that can recover from this carnage without large-scale changes, without a new economic paradigm that doesn’t reward waste and planned obsolescence and profiting off the lives of others.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 96</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Generally speaking, the job of mainstream corporate outlets is to ignore the harsh reality that our endless consumption and furious appetite for fossil fuels are burning our country, turning it into a desert wasteland—and the easiest response is to throw slave labor at the problem.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 96</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Simply put, humans have no business going about our day-to-day activities as if we aren’t on the event horizon. It’s equivalent to working on your model train set while your kitchen is burning down, your spouse is in the bathroom battling an alligator that’s taken up residence in the bathtub, and your 12-year-old daughter is in the living room, having just been offered heroin for the first time. Right now, humanity is still focused on the model train.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 99</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Maybe we’re right to die off. Maybe our hubris and egos the size of SUVs have doomed us, and we should just give up and enjoy our final few years. But if that’s the case, I would like an announcement. I would honestly prefer a national address by some of our so-called leaders stating clearly, “Look, folks, to continue civilized society of the human species, we would need to change everything. Every single one of us would have to labor toward a massive shift to a sustainable culture that works in harmony with nature rather than abusing nature like it’s a servant who gave us an ugly look. We would have to focus on achieving this new society rather than spending a third of our free time watching superhero movies. But we have no intention of doing that because it sounds kinda hard, not to mention that corporate profits would suffer in the short term. So instead, we’re declaring here and now that we’ll all just keep functioning as is until such time as the oceans turn to acid, the ever-growing storms consume us, and California feels like the inside of a kiln. According to our best minds, that will be 10 to 20 years from now, so don’t worry about starting that retirement fund. Don’t buy the extended warranty on that vacuum. And whatever you do, at no point and under no circumstances should you quit smoking and drinking…. Thank you, and good night.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 100</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;I would actually respect the whole system if right on the front of the stock exchange it said, “Put your money into the stock market! The only way you’ll make more money is if you find a dolt to buy whatever stocks you just bought. But there are an infinite number of dolts! This gravy train is powered by morons. So you have nothing to worry about.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 104</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;But the casinos are honest with you. They tell you it’s gambling. The front of a casino doesn’t say “Invest your pension in roulette. Do you have a child with a degenerative disease? Then put all your savings on red-32 so that he’ll be taken care of after you’re gone.” Casinos don’t say that. The myth of the stock market does.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 105</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Step two is to realize that the market economy in general is designed to exploit billions of us while a tiny number get ridiculously rich. It doesn’t care about the health or sustainability of our society as it facilitates the extraction of all the wealth and resources by sociopaths. Just ask Jeff Bezos—he’s now worth 150 billion padoodles of Amazon stock, while his workers are on food stamps.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 107</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;They aren’t even trying to cure infectious diseases that make them piles of cash. Instead, the moneyed interests are complaining to their clients that they need to avoid curing these diseases. Because not only do they lose money on the patient who no longer needs meds, they also lose money because that patient won’t pass the disease onto others.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 111</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The only way a system ends up at this point—with our values this far upside down—is with endless advertising in a profit-driven society. This is a system built on the exploitation of others for gain. There was no time when that was not true. And that’s why we need a revolution of the mind.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 112</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;would you say, “Jeffrey Dahmer achieved eating the hearts of 10 different people?” No, that would sound odd to you. Yet having 150 billion dollars is nearly as sociopathic, and still we use terminology as if it’s great!&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 114</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Jeff Bezos himself could end world hunger for five straight years. If he teamed up with the Koch brothers, they could do it for eight to 10 years.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 116</div></div><p>This doesn&rsquo;t work. The wealth isn&rsquo;t real. Take some of it and it collapses.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;[…] the goals of our economy (and any economy), according to Zeitgeist Movement founder Peter Joseph,12 and I agree, should be: pursuit of abundance (all people’s basic needs are met); sustainability (can the system keep going forever); liberation of humanity from hard and dangerous labor (nobody doing jobs they hate); adaptation to emerging technologies and variables.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 118</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;According to the Economic Policy Institute, “In 2007, average annual incomes of the top 1 percent of households were 42 times greater than incomes of the bottom 90 percent (up from 14 times greater in 1979), and incomes of the 0.1 percent were 220 times greater (up from 47 times greater in 1979).”7 Workers’ lives didn’t get better with productivity. Wall Street steals more and more of the money and gives less and less to the worker. The bottom 90 percent then fight over the scraps and hate each other for it. “Hey! Why do teachers get to have health care, while the rest of us don’t? Fuck you, teachers! What have you ever done for society? I’m voting for whoever is taking the health care away from the teachers.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 130</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;How do we rate success? We look at gross domestic product—how much we’re producing. GDP doesn’t measure how many kids are drinking toxic water or breathing toxic air. It doesn’t measure how many dolphins are choking on plastic beer rings. It only measures how many beers you chug down. It doesn’t measure how many trees were planted. It measures how many trees we cut down to make the cardboard for coffee cups and condom boxes. It doesn’t rate how screwed the environment is, just how much stuff we buy to keep screwing. Buy a dildo? Good for the economy. Throw an old dildo out? Ends up in the ocean, gets stuck in a whale’s blowhole. GDP doesn’t care.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 130</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;GDP doesn’t measure how many animals went extinct. It only measures how many animals we ate or sold. You could be eating a bald eagle roasted with giraffe bacon wrapped around it. As long as you bought it at the store, it’s good for GDP.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 131</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;I mean, if that’s not the point, just let me know, and I’ll get on board. Oh, the point is to make sure a tiny number of individuals can afford to purchase their own islands with helicopter landing pads? Oh, I had no idea that was the meaning of life. I’m sorry I’ve been resisting it so long. In that case, the stock market seems to be working perfectly.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 132</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Imagine the aliens that come down here after we’ve eaten everything, killed everything, and turned it all to dust. Imagine them showing up and going, “What happened to those little fellows that used to be here?” “Well, they imagined something called the stock market, where nonliving entities called corporations compete to see which one can exploit the earth the most. It eventually swallowed up the whole biosphere they lived in.” “Oh, which corporation won?” “Ironically, the one called Amazon, which used to be the name of the largest river in the world, until they paved it.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 132</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;It’s like a guy driving a car and only seeing speed, being completely blind to how many people he runs down. He’d get to his destination in record time and say to the townspeople, who all had family members run over by this maniac, “We did it. I got here in record time. We should all celebrate together.” One percent of America is celebrating. It’s time to do things differently.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 133</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;It seems clear the real goal is to hand over our elections systems to the military-industrial complex—your friendly neighborhood death machine—and bury the reality of our votes under enough encryption and complex technology that no average citizen really knows what’s happening.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 140</div></div><p>Easy there, Lee. The average American won&rsquo;t know what&rsquo;s going on no matter how transparent it is.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;In light of our endless need to meddle in the democratic elections of every country, when political philosophy heavyweight Noam Chomsky was asked about this topic, he said, “most of the world is just collapsing in laughter” on claims that Russia intervened in the US election.21 Well, I’m glad we could provide some entertainment for the rest of the world.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 150</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Yes, it is true that cops kill a lot of white people. They kill more white people than Wendy’s trademarked Baconator sandwich. However, cops kill more people of color than the population percentages would dictate, and they’re more likely to kill people of color who aren’t armed. So while whites do lose their lives in our current police state at a ridiculous rate, they are far more likely to be waving around a gun when it happens.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 164</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;They passed the Protect and Serve Act of 2018, with only 35 representatives voting against it.7 This is impressively shocking considering that our current Congress usually reserves that level of bipartisanship for bills giving themselves a raise or approving war criminals for cabinet positions.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 166</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Also illegal is housing the homeless.6 Earlier this year, according to Splinter News, “police arrived at [a Chicago man’s] house with a warrant and threatened to condemn his property unless he closed his ‘unlawful basement sleeping area.’” Not illegal is taking blankets away from the homeless, as the Denver police were caught doing.7 Also not illegal: destroying tiny homes built for the homeless. Cops did that too.8 Banks foreclose on millions of homes, making millions of families homeless. That’s not illegal. We throw out 40 percent of all food. That’s not illegal.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 171</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The real reason we can’t have people helping the homeless, giving out food and housing, is because it threatens to give a good example, to show another way forward. As Act Out! host Eleanor Goldfield wrote: “Filling the gaping chasms purposefully carved by capitalism and its keepers raises people’s awareness; it forces them to reckon with the system they live in and ask whether or not it’s worth protecting—or fighting against.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 172</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;In this particular instance, systemic racism does not originate in race but in the way the rich have crafted our laws and our systems to favor the rich. So it’s a class issue rather than a race issue. Unfortunately, other factors of systemic racism—such as hiring practices and who gets promoted—ensure that white people are more likely to be extremely wealthy and less likely to be extremely poor. Therefore, our country has a racial wealth gap the size of the Grand Canyon&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 182</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;All told, much of our systemic racism problem comes down to class and wealth, not just race. But race, class, and wealth are deeply, inexorably linked. And therefore, whether you choose to ignore it or not, we must acknowledge that systemic racism is a thing. It’s in our schools, our air, our water, and even our televisions. It impacts every area of our lives, and much like climate change, we need to start fixing it rather than acting like it doesn’t exist.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 184</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Subconsciously they must believe that a life in which we’re tirelessly exploited by rich villains and know all about it thanks to the exhaustive efforts of an eccentric Australian is worse than one in which we’re tirelessly exploited by rich villains yet know nothing about it.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 186</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;We’re supposed to vote based on our knowledge of how our government is functioning. But if the entirety of our representatives’ criminal behavior is labeled top secret for national security purposes, then we aren’t really an informed populace, are we? So for all that was unveiled in the State Department cables, no one has been locked up. But Julian Assange has been for revealing them.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 191</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;So why have so many outlets and people turned against Assange and WikiLeaks? Because it turned out he wasn’t revealing only repressive Arab regimes. He also revealed US-backed coups and war crimes around the world. He exposed the criminality and villainy of the American ruling elite.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 193</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;We are all Julian Assange. As long as he’s imprisoned, we can never be free.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 193</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Remember that the next time Jean Shaheen, Claire McCaskill, Mark Warner, and Sheldon Whitehouse try to tell you they’re “part of the resistance.” No, they’re “part of the freesistance”—giving Trump a free pass for unlimited war. They’re paid employees of the war profiteers. Having the word “Senator” before your name just means you’re one of the more highly paid employees. It just means you have a bathroom that others aren’t allowed to use.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 198</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;As George Carlin said, “It’s a big club, and you ain’t in it.” Schiff is corrupt and working for corporate America and Wall Street. Trump is corrupt and working for corporate America and Wall Street. Ninety-five percent of the Democratic congresspeople are corrupt and working for corporate America and Wall Street. Ninety-nine percent of the Republicans are corrupt and working for corporate America and Wall Street. Do not expect them to save us.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 200</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Are we living our lives in a genuine, authentic manner or is a large part of it subconsciously (consciously?) mimicking bullshit from movies and TV and Cialis commercials? And the people who write this crap: Are they writing the wet shoes moment because it’s honestly what they believe falling in love looks like? Or is it because they saw it in a commercial 10 years earlier and internalized it? Which came first, the chicken or the chicken walking in the water worried about the sand stuck between his toes or talons or claws or whatever chickens currently have?&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 203</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The Post acts as if Wall Street’s growth is somehow good for average Americans. It’s not. Trump, Hillary, and the Post are all part of an elite class enjoying the spoils of a fully exploited working class. Judging the health of our society by looking at stock prices is like judging the health of a dying man by looking at the leeches on his skin. “Wow, those leeches are very happy. This man is in peak condition!”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 207</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The Post’s correction is the equivalent of the president bragging that he brought hit man jobs back to West Virginia and then the Post saying: “In fact, hit man jobs have not returned as promised, and very few people have been professionally murdered in West Virginia in the past year.” The Post should have said: “In fact, coal jobs have not returned, and that is a good thing if we value the air in our lungs and the life in our bodies.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 213</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;My show, written by me and my correspondents, is certainly not the Russian view of global news and neither is—for example—Larry King’s show on RT America. (I get that Dr. Who is further afield of news than my show is, but the analogy is simply meant to say these networks create shows that are not strictly straight news.) And anyone who thinks CNN, for instance, isn’t the American view of global news is kidding themselves.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 221</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;I don’t believe Trump is the cause of our country’s main problems. I believe he is a symptom of an incredibly corrupt corporate-ruled system. He is a horrible and rather—not bright—man, but he is not the cause of the millions of hungry and homeless and imprisoned in our country. He is not the cause of the flaws in our democracy and our media. He is just the pimple that has risen up.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 223</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;But describing those laughing Russians serves a purpose greater than an interesting tidbit. Zinoman sat through an entire 90-minute stand-up comedy show in which I covered everything from how our leaders force us into endless war through how we can feed every human on the planet and how we are sold an infinite parade of lies to how my comedy doesn’t go over well at children’s birthday parties. He saw me cover all those important issues. He saw an audience of over 200 people loving it and coming up to meet me afterwards. He saw a guy who has fought hard for 20 years to do stand-up comedy that matters—that enlightens and informs and entertains. He saw it all. But none of that fit with the propaganda he needed to push. In fact, it went against the storyline he was trying to create.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 229</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Gerrymandering, voter purging, data mining, broken exit polling, push polling, superdelegates, electoral votes, blackbox machines, voter ID suppression, provisional ballots, super PACs, dark money, third parties banished from the debates, and two corporate parties that stand for the same goddamn pile of fetid crap! What part of this sounds like a legitimate electoral system? No, we have what a large Harvard study called the worst electoral system in the Western world.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 234</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The dark truth is that we have to believe the myth that consuming is the answer, or else we won’t keep running around the wheel. And if we aren’t running around the wheel, then we start thinking, start asking questions. Those questions are not good for the ruling elite, who enjoy a society based on the daily exploitation of 99 percent of&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 237</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;We are less free than a dog on a leash. We live in one of the hardest working, most unequal societies on the planet, with more billionaires than ever. Meanwhile, Americans supply 94 percent of the paid blood used worldwide,13 and it’s almost exclusively coming from very poor people.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 240</div></div>      </div>
      </div>
        <div class="footer">
    <div class="footer-data"><div class="footer-links"><ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/contact.php" title="">Contact</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/support.php" title="">Support</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/privacy.php" title="">Privacy</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/rights.php" title="">Rights</a></li></ul></div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="copyright">Copyright (c) 1999-2026 earthli.com. All Rights Reserved.</div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="versions">Powered by <ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore/app_news.php">earthli News 3.7</a></li><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore" title="">earthli WebCore&trade; 3.7</a></li></ul></div></div>    </div>
      </div>
  </div>  </body>
</html>
]]>
  </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
      <title type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[Tropic of Cancer by Henry Miller (1934; read in 2020)]]>
  </title>
    <id>https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=4095</id>
    <link href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=4095"/>
    <updated>2021-01-02T14:04:53+01:00</updated>
    <author>
        <name type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[Marco von Ballmoos]]>
  </name>
      <uri>https://earthli.com/users/marco</uri>
    </author>
      <summary type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<blockquote class="quote abstract "><div>Disclaimer: these are notes I took while reading this book. They include citations I found interesting or enlightening or particularly well-written. In some cases, I&rsquo;ve pointed out which of these applies to which citation; in others, I have not. Any benefit you gain from reading these notes is... [<a class="complete-text-link" href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=4095">More</a>]</div></blockquote>]]>
  </summary>
      <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<html lang="en">
  <head>
    <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/themes/ice.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/fonts/raleway.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/core/medium.css">
  </head>
  <body>
<div class="style-controls">  <div class="page">
    <div class="page-body">
<div class="info-box-top">
<p>
Published by <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_user.php?name=marco" title="Marco von Ballmoos" class="visible">marco</a> on <span class="date-time">2. Jan 2021 14:04:53 (GMT-5)</span>
</p>
</div>
      <div class="text-flow wide">
  <blockquote class="quote abstract "><div>Disclaimer: these are notes I took while reading this book. They include citations I found interesting or enlightening or particularly well-written. In some cases, I&rsquo;ve pointed out which of these applies to which citation; in others, I have not. Any benefit you gain from reading these notes is purely incidental to the purpose they serve of reminding me what I once read. Please see Wikipedia for a summary if I&rsquo;ve failed to provide one sufficient for your purposes. If my notes serve to trigger an interest in this book, then I&rsquo;m happy for you.</div></blockquote><p>This book feels like an autobiographical novel about Miller&rsquo;s long stay in Paris as a relatively poor, struggling writer. It chains together notes and snippets and observations about life and people he knew to form a vague sort of history of a man with very few cares, a man accustomed to poverty, a man with a rich inner life, a man who&rsquo;s left behind a wife and family. Occasional and intense longing for this family is generously tempered with indifference and laxity.</p>
<p>He lives in Paris, thinking nearly exclusively of where he&rsquo;s going to get his next meal, but also where his next prostitute will come from. The second being almost more important because he often goes without a meal longer than without a fuck.</p>
<p>This nearly incessant rutting is, honestly, incongruous with the supposedly erudite author. How he&rsquo;s able to get anything done while simultaneously post-coitally stunned and starving is impressive. He is, at times, quite eloquent in expressing his deep regard for women, even if it is from a nearly purely sexual angle.</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The earth is not an arid plateau of health and comfort, but a great sprawling female with velvet torso that swells and heaves with ocean billows; she squirms beneath a diadem of sweat and anguish. Naked and sexed she rolls among the clouds in the violet light of the stars. All of her, from her generous breasts to her gleaming thighs, blazes with furious ardor.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>He can almost always transform a minor windfall or payment into a roof over his head for a month or two. This is more than sufficient security for him and doesn&rsquo;t worry him enough to make him change the aforementioned priorities.</p>
<p>At one point, he comes up with a plan to take advantage of the good graces and manners of some of his more well-to-do friends—his erudition having gotten him into social circles that his very meager means never could.</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;And then it occurred to me, like a flash, that no one would refuse a man a meal if only he had the courage to demand it. I went immediately to a café and wrote a dozen letters.</p>
<p>&ldquo;“Would you let me have dinner with you once a week? Tell me what day is most convenient for you.”</p>
<p>&ldquo;It worked like a charm. I was not only fed… I was feasted. Every night I went home drunk. […]&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote><p>The book ends largely as it began, with Miller in Paris, debauched and writing and drinking and fucking and peregrinating by day from one café and bar to another and by night from one rented room or mooched living situation to another.</p>
<p>The remainder of this review will be largely annotated citations, which hopefully give a better impression of the book&rsquo;s philosophical passages.</p>
<p>At times, he writes like <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=4066">Burroughs in <em>Naked Lunch</em></a>, of what are obviously hallucinatory trips through Paris.</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;I lean out the window and the Eiffel Tower is fizzing champagne; it is built entirely of numbers and shrouded in black lace. The sewers are gurgling furiously. There are nothing but roofs everywhere, laid out with execrable geometric cunning.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>At other times, his metaphors are more down-to-Earth, but no less enchanting, as when describes a woman lying on her deathbed.<br>
 </p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Two waxen hands lying listlessly on the bedspread and along the pale veins the fluted murmur of a shell repeating the legend of its birth.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>There are some long passages of this kind of mental peregrination, with some philosophical musing that doesn&rsquo;t move what little there is of a plot forward in any way. It&rsquo;s nicely written, though, and segues into the segments where he directly and autobiographically addresses what it&rsquo;s like to be a writer, especially one who&rsquo;s achieved a modicum of success and who has acquired a fan base that expects more.</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Great God! what have I turned into? What right have you people to clutter up my life, steal my time, probe my soul, suckle my thoughts, have me for your companion, confidant, and information bureau? What do you take me for? Am I an entertainer on salary, required every evening to play an intellectual farce under your stupid noses? Am I a slave, bought and paid for, to crawl on my belly in front of you idlers and lay at your feet all that I do and all that I know? Am I a wench in a brothel who is called upon to lift her skirts or take off her chemise at the bidding of the first man in a tailored suit who comes along?&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>The process of writing—and of finding something to write, of expressing the tumult of disorganized brilliance jostling in the author&rsquo;s head—is given much thought as well. The following passage viscerally describes a writer&rsquo;s block engendered by the inability to get started because of a fear of mimicry, made only worse by the author reading more and more voraciously in an effort to <em>prove</em> that their own ideas are original. This education informs the author&rsquo;s own ideas, making them hesitant to write down what are now suspected be unoriginal thoughts.</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;[…] And so, instead of tackling his book, he reads one author after another in order to make absolutely certain that he is not going to tread on their private property. And the more he reads the more disdainful he becomes. None of them are satisfying; none of them arrive at that degree of perfection which he has imposed on himself. And forgetting completely that he has not written as much as a chapter he talks about them condescendingly, quite as though there existed a shelf of books bearing his name, books which everyone is familiar with and the titles of which it is therefore superfluous to mention.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>He is convinced, though, that being an author—or any sort of creative person—is superior, somehow, to the common runner of the rat race, if only because these creations impart fleeting moments of glory and joy not only to those best able to appreciate them—the creatives—but also to those benighted rat-race runners. A little light is better than nothing.</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;[…] now and then we encounter pages that explode, pages that wound and sear, that wring groans and tears and curses, know that they come from a man with his back up, a man whose only defenses left are his words and his words are always stronger than the lying, crushing weight of the world, stronger than all the racks and wheels which the cowardly invent to crush out the miracle of personality.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>He is an expatriate who feels infinitely more at home in his adopted city than in the city of his birth. He contrasts <span class="quote-inline">&ldquo;[a]nd God knows, when spring comes to Paris the humblest mortal alive must feel that he dwells in paradise.&rdquo;</span> with <span class="quote-inline">&ldquo;New York! […] A whole city erected over a hollow pit of nothingness. Meaningless. Absolutely meaningless.&rdquo;</span> At the same time, he knows that the Parisians, who allow him to live among them, view him—and his fellow ex-pats, whom he naturally views as less-well-integrated—as madmen, unable to understand reality in anything approaching a mature fashion.</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;No wonder they think we’re all crazy. We are crazy to them. We’re just a pack of children. Senile idiots. What we call life is a five-and-ten-cent store romance. That enthusiasm underneath—what is it? That cheap optimism which turns the stomach of any ordinary European? It’s illusion. No, illusion’s too good a word for it. Illusion means something. No, it’s not that—it’s delusion. It’s sheer delusion, that’s what.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>It&rsquo;s not just Miller who lives this life; among the many descriptions of friends and acquaintances, there is this succinct one of Kepi, whose description hits a bit too close to home for the author, I suspect.</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Kepi is interesting, in a way, because he has absolutely no ambition except to get a fuck every night. Every penny he makes, and they are damned few, he squanders in the dance halls. He has a wife and eight children in Bombay, but that does not prevent him from proposing marriage to any little femme de chambre who is stupid and credulous enough to be taken in by him.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>At one point, he gets a steady job as a copy-editor. He writes of the passing of a co-worker, a man named Peckover, who&rsquo;d never been worth <span class="quote-inline">&ldquo;a good goddamn&rdquo;</span> as either a friend or a journalist but who, after dying a ludicrous death in an elevator shaft he&rsquo;d somehow not noticed was wide open, is covered in encomiums by most of his other, former, and more hypocritical coworkers.</p>
<p>Here, Miller writes of the fool who&rsquo;d written the man&rsquo;s obituary.</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Joe and I, who knew Peckover well and who knew also that he wasn’t worth a good goddamn, even a few tears, we felt annoyed with this drunken sentimentality. We wanted to tell him so too, but with a guy like that you can’t afford to be honest; you have to buy a wreath and go to the funeral and pretend that you’re miserable. And you have to congratulate him too for the delicate obituary he’s written. He’ll be carrying his delicate little obituary around with him for months, praising the shit out of himself for the way he handled the situation.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>Miller and his friend and co-worker Joe, on the other hand, are in no way tethered by social mores.</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;There are people in this world who cut such a grotesque figure that even death renders them ridiculous. And the more horrible the death the more ridiculous they seem. It’s no use trying to invest the end with a little dignity—you have to be a liar and a hypocrite to discover anything tragic in their going. And since we didn’t have to put on a false front we could laugh about the incident to our heart’s content. We laughed all night about it, and in between times we vented our scorn and disgust for the guys upstairs, the fatheads who were trying to persuade themselves, no doubt, that Peckover was a fine fellow and that his death was a catastrophe.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>It is, at heart, an existentialist novel, with many formulations and much pondering about what life really means—and coming to the conclusion that meaning is fleeting and not worth pursuing.</p>
<p>For example, there is this lovely passage describing the actual coupling after he&rsquo;s hunted and &ldquo;captured&rdquo; a prostitute with FF15. He acknowledges that only the pursuit offered him anything—and that the prostitute similarly seemed less-than-interested in the whole affair. It&rsquo;s all meaningless, but pursued by both parties nonetheless.</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;We haven’t any passion either of us. And as for her, one might as well expect her to produce a diamond necklace as to show a spark of passion. But there’s the fifteen francs and something has to be done about it. It’s like a state of war: the moment the condition is precipitated nobody thinks about anything but peace, about getting it over with. And yet nobody has the courage to lay down his arms, to say, “I’m fed up with it… I’m through.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>This meaninglessness goes largely unacknowledged, with man seeking to imbue meaning (much as his co-workers used the occasion of Peckover&rsquo;s death) to a life otherwise lived from day to day, with no overarching purpose. If Peckover&rsquo;s life was worthless, then what of one&rsquo;s own? Best to sing Peckover&rsquo;s praises in order to convince oneself of one&rsquo;s own worth. </p>
<p>Miller seems to argue that this is the root of man&rsquo;s evil—an inability to just be at peace with inconsequence.</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;For some reason or other man looks for the miracle, and to accomplish it he will wade through blood. He will debauch himself with ideas, he will reduce himself to a shadow if for only one second of his life he can close his eyes to the hideousness of reality. Everything is endured—disgrace, humiliation, poverty, war, crime, ennui—in the belief that overnight something will occur, a miracle, which will render life tolerable.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;It’s like a man in the trenches again: he doesn’t know any more why he should go on living, because if he escapes now he’ll only be caught later, but he goes on just the same, and even though he has the soul of a cockroach and has admitted as much to himself, give him a gun or a knife or even just his bare nails, and he’ll go on slaughtering and slaughtering, <strong>he’d slaughter a million men rather than stop and ask himself why.</strong>&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>In the next passage, Miller offers an empathetic view of an otherwise societally excoriated profession i.e. &ldquo;Pimpin&rsquo; ain&rsquo;t easy&rdquo;.</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;You don’t think that a pimp is inhuman, I hope? A pimp has his private grief and misery too, don’t you forget. Perhaps he would like nothing better than to stand on the corner every night with a pair of white dogs and watch them piddle. Perhaps he would like it if, when he opened the door, he would see her there reading the Paris-Soir, her eyes already a little heavy with sleep. Perhaps it isn’t so wonderful, when he bends over his Lucienne, to taste another man’s breath. Better maybe to have only three francs in your pocket and a pair of white dogs that piddle on the corner than to taste those bruised lips.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>There are several passages that lament what industrial society has done to man, even back in 1934, when it had gotten a good start but hadn&rsquo;t even begun to dream of the ravages it would achieve by the end of the century. In particular, it is cities that are the <span class="quote-inline">&ldquo;machine [squeezing the] last drop of juice&rdquo;</span> from people.</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;I am speaking naturally of that world which is peculiar to the big cities, the world of men and women whose last drop of juice has been squeezed out by the machine—the martyrs of modern progress.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>In a roundabout way, he explains his indolent lifestyle as a desire to avoid the zero-sum rat race—the <span class="quote-inline">&ldquo;harness&rdquo;</span>. Industry eradicates everything in its path with its endless cry to move <span class="quote-inline">&ldquo;Forward!&rdquo;</span> without thinking at all of why. As acknowledged elsewhere, there is no &ldquo;why&rdquo;, but then what&rsquo;s the point of this enslavement of man to this industrial goal?</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;All over the States I wandered, and into Canada and Mexico. The same story everywhere. If you want bread you’ve got to get in harness, get in lock step. Over all the earth a gray desert, a carpet of steel and cement. Production! More nuts and bolts, more barbed wire, more dog biscuits, more lawn mowers, more ball bearings, more high explosives, more tanks, more poison gas, more soap, more toothpaste, more newspapers, more education, more churches, more libraries, more museums. Forward!&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>Without acknowledging that his debauched life in Paris depends on a several strata of just such workers providing the fruits of a society that can sustain his mooching, Miller has mostly disdain for those who have chosen—or been forced—to take up the harness instead of throwing it off, like he has. Recall that he has abandoned a family in another country.</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;There was nothing to distinguish them from the clods whom they would later wipe their boots on. They were zeros in every sense of the word, ciphers who form the nucleus of a respectable and lamentable citizenry.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>This book is most definitely the kind that depends very much on what you bring to it. Therefore, it will feel different depending on when in your life you read it. Everything is subjective and very little is as meaningful as it appears.</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;[…] it is here that one reads again the books of his youth and the enigmas take on new meanings, one for every white hair.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><h2>Citations</h2><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;This book brings with it a wind that blows down the dead and hollow trees whose roots are withered and lost in the barren soil of our times. This book goes to the roots and digs under, digs for subterranean springs.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 395-398 by <cite>Ana&iuml;s Nin</cite> in 1934</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;This then? This is not a book. This is libel, slander, defamation of character. This is not a book, in the ordinary sense of the word. No, this is a prolonged insult, a gob of spit in the face of Art, a kick in the pants to God, Man, Destiny, Time, Love, Beauty… what you will. I am going to sing for you, a little off key perhaps, but I will sing. I will sing while you croak, I will dance over your dirty corpse. …&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 407-410</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The chicleros came over on the ridge of a sunken continent. They brought with them an algebraic language. In the Arizona desert they met the Mongols of the North, glazed like eggplants. Time shortly after the earth had taken its gyroscopic lean—when the Gulf Stream was parting ways with the Japanese current. In the heart of the soil they found tufa rock. They embroidered the very bowels of the earth with their language. They ate one another’s entrails and the forest closed in on them, on their bones and skulls, on their lace tufa. Their language was lost. Here and there one still finds the remnants of a menagerie, a brain plate covered with figures.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 516-520</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;We stand on five minutes and devour centuries. You are the sieve through which my anarchy strains, resolves itself into words. Behind the word is chaos. Each word a stripe, a bar, but there are not and never will be enough bars to make the mesh.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 523-525</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;I hear not a word because she is beautiful and I love her and now I am happy and willing to die.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 634-635</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;A new day is beginning. I felt it this morning as we stood before one of Dufresne’s glistening canvases, a sort of déjeuner intime in the thirteenth century, sans vin. A fine, fleshy nude, solid, vibrant, pink as a fingernail, with glistening billows of flesh; all the secondary characteristics, and a few of the primary. A body that sings, that has the moisture of dawn. A still life, only nothing is still, nothing dead here. The table creaks with food; it is so heavy it is sliding out of the frame.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 667-670</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Ah, the Germans! They take you all over like an omnibus. They give you indigestion. In the same night one cannot visit the morgue, the infirmary, the zoo, the signs of the zodiac, the limbos of philosophy, the caves of epistemology, the arcana of Freud and Stekel. … On the merry-go-round one doesn’t get anywhere, whereas with the Germans one can go from Vega to Lope de Vega, all in one night, and come away as foolish as Parsifal.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 712-715</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Suddenly it seems as if the dawn were coming: it is like water purling over ice and the ice is blue with a rising mist, glaciers sunk in emerald green, chamois and antelope, golden groupers, sea cows mooching along and the amber jack leaping over the Arctic rim.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 707-709</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Sunday! Left the Villa Borghese a little before noon, just as Boris was getting ready to sit down to lunch. I left out of a sense of delicacy, because it really pains Boris to see me sitting there in the studio with an empty belly. Why he doesn’t invite me to lunch with him I don’t know. He says he can’t afford it, but that’s no excuse. Anyway, I’m delicate about it. If it pains him to eat alone in my presence it would probably pain him more to share his meal with me. It’s not my place to pry into his secret affairs.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 860-863</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;In the middle of the court is a clump of decrepit buildings which have so rotted away that they have collapsed on one another and formed a sort of intestinal embrace. The ground is uneven, the flagging slippery with slime. A sort of human dump heap which has been filled in with cinders and dry garbage. The sun is setting fast. The colors die. They shift from purple to dried blood, from nacre to bister, from cool dead grays to pigeon shit. Here and there a lopsided monster stands in the window blinking like an owl. There is the shrill squawk of children with pale faces and bony limbs, rickety little urchins marked with the forceps. A fetid odor seeps from the walls, the odor of a mildewed mattress. Europe—medieval, grotesque, monstrous: a symphony in B-mol. Directly across the street the Ciné Combat offers its distinguished clientele Metropolis.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 906-912</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;For her were meant those terrible words of Louis-Philippe, “and a night comes when all is over, when so many jaws have closed upon us that we no longer have the strength to stand, and our meat hangs upon our bodies, as though it had been masticated by every mouth.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 965-967</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;And then it occurred to me, like a flash, that no one would refuse a man a meal if only he had the courage to demand it. I went immediately to a café and wrote a dozen letters.</p>
<p>&ldquo;“Would you let me have dinner with you once a week? Tell me what day is most convenient for you.”</p>
<p>&ldquo;It worked like a charm. I was not only fed… I was feasted. Every night I went home drunk. They couldn’t do enough for me, these generous once-a-week souls. What happened to me between times was none of their affair. Now and then the thoughtful ones presented me with cigarettes, or a little pin money. </p>
<p>&ldquo;They were all obviously relieved when they realized that they would see me only once a week. And they were still more relieved when I said—“it won’t be necessary any more.” They never asked why. They congratulated me, and that was all. Often the reason was I had found a better host; I could afford to scratch off the ones who were a pain in the ass. But that thought never occurred to them.&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 1084-1091</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;A woman is sitting on a dais above an immense carven desk; she has a snake around her neck. The entire room is lined with books and strange fish swimming in colored globes; there are maps and charts on the wall, maps of Paris before the plague, maps of the antique world, of Knossos and Carthage, of Carthage before and after the salting. In the corner of the room I see an iron bedstead and on it a corpse is lying; the woman gets up wearily, removes the corpse from the bed and absent-mindedly throws it out the window. She returns to the huge carven desk, takes a goldfish from the bowl and swallows it. Slowly the room begins to revolve and one by one the continents slide into the sea; only the woman is left, but her body is a mass of geography. I lean out the window and the Eiffel Tower is fizzing champagne; it is built entirely of numbers and shrouded in black lace. The sewers are gurgling furiously. There are nothing but roofs everywhere, laid out with execrable geometric cunning.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 1193-1200</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Great God! what have I turned into? What right have you people to clutter up my life, steal my time, probe my soul, suckle my thoughts, have me for your companion, confidant, and information bureau? What do you take me for? Am I an entertainer on salary, required every evening to play an intellectual farce under your stupid noses? Am I a slave, bought and paid for, to crawl on my belly in front of you idlers and lay at your feet all that I do and all that I know? Am I a wench in a brothel who is called upon to lift her skirts or take off her chemise at the bidding of the first man in a tailored suit who comes along?&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 1222-1226</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The Rue Amélie is one of my favorite streets. It is one of those streets which by good fortune the municipality has forgotten to pave. Huge cobblestones spreading convexly from one side of the street to the other. Only one block long and narrow.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 1239-1241</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;And God knows, when spring comes to Paris the humblest mortal alive must feel that he dwells in paradise.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 1252-1253</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;A wagon from the Galeries Lafayette was rumbling over the bridge. The rain had stopped and the sun breaking through the soapy clouds touched the glistening rubble of roofs with a cold fire. I recall now how the driver leaned out and looked up the river toward Passy way. Such a healthy, simple, approving glance, as if he were saying to himself: “Ah, spring is coming!” And God knows, when spring comes to Paris the humblest mortal alive must feel that he dwells in paradise. But it was not only this—it was the intimacy with which his eye rested upon the scene. It was his Paris. A man does not need to be rich, nor even a citizen, to feel this way about Paris. Paris is filled with poor people—the proudest and filthiest lot of beggars that ever walked the earth, it seems to me. And yet they give the illusion of being at home. It is that which distinguishes the Parisian from all other metropolitan souls.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 1250-1256</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;New York! The white prisons, the sidewalks swarming with maggots, the breadlines, the opium joints that are built like palaces, the kikes that are there, the lepers, the thugs, and above all, the ennui, the monotony of faces, streets, legs, houses, skyscrapers, meals, posters, jobs, crimes, loves. … A whole city erected over a hollow pit of nothingness. Meaningless. Absolutely meaningless.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 1261-1263</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;As luck would have it I find a ticket in the lavabo for a concert. Light as a feather now I go there to the Salle Gaveau. The usher looks ravaged because I overlook giving him his little tip. Every time he passes me he looks at me inquiringly, as if perhaps I will suddenly remember.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 1331-1333</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Near the door, huddled in a big cape, stands a Spaniard with a sombrero in his hand. He looks as if he were posing for the “Balzac” of Rodin. From the neck up he suggests Buffalo Bill.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 1374-1375</div></div><p>That&rsquo;s the phallic one.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;[…] you pray like that every day, he says, nothing will happen to you. The good lord what’s his name never forgets an obedient servant. And then he shows me the crooked arm which he got in a taxi accident on a day doubtless when he had neglected to rehearse the complete song and dance.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 1433-1435</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Kepi is interesting, in a way, because he has absolutely no ambition except to get a fuck every night. Every penny he makes, and they are damned few, he squanders in the dance halls. He has a wife and eight children in Bombay, but that does not prevent him from proposing marriage to any little femme de chambre who is stupid and credulous enough to be taken in by him.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 1484-1486</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;There is something so fantastic, so incongruous about this gallery that one is reminded inevitably of the great spawn of temples which stretch from the Himalayas to the tip of Ceylon, a vast jumble of architecture, staggering in beauty and at the same time monstrous, hideously monstrous because the fecundity which seethes and ferments in the myriad ramifications of design seems to have exhausted the very soil of India itself.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 1517-1520</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;India’s enemy is not England, but America. India’s enemy is the time spirit, the hand which cannot be turned back. Nothing will avail to offset this virus which is poisoning the whole world. America is the very incarnation of doom. She will drag the whole world down to the bottomless pit.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 1594-1596</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;There is a sort of subdued pandemonium in the air, a note of repressed violence, as if the awaited explosion required the advent of some utterly minute detail, something microscopic but thoroughly unpremeditated, completely unexpected.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 1609-1611</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;For some reason or other man looks for the miracle, and to accomplish it he will wade through blood. He will debauch himself with ideas, he will reduce himself to a shadow if for only one second of his life he can close his eyes to the hideousness of reality. Everything is endured—disgrace, humiliation, poverty, war, crime, ennui—in the belief that overnight something will occur, a miracle, which will render life tolerable.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 1627-1630</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Heretofore I have been trying to save my precious hide, trying to preserve the few pieces of meat that hid my bones. I am done with that. I have reached the limits of endurance. My back is to the wall; I can retreat no further. As far as history goes I am dead. If there is something beyond I shall have to bounce back. I have found God, but he is insufficient. I am only spiritually dead. Physically I am alive. Morally I am free. The world which I have departed is a menagerie.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 1654-1658</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;They look so absolutely peaceful and contented, as if they had been dozing there for years, that suddenly it seems to me as if we had been standing in this room, in exactly this position, for an incalculably long time, that it was a pose we had struck in a dream from which we never emerged, a dream which the least gesture, the wink of an eye even, will shatter.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 2026-2029</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;In a sense Van Norden is mad, of that I’m convinced. His one fear is to be left alone, and this fear is so deep and so persistent that even when he is on top of a woman, even when he has welded himself to her, he cannot escape the prison which he has created for himself.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 2080-2082</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The book must be absolutely original, absolutely perfect. That is why, among other things, it is impossible for him to get started on it. As soon as he gets an idea he begins to question it. He remembers that Dostoevski used it, or Hamsun, or somebody else. “I’m not saying that I want to be better than them, but I want to be different,” he explains. And so, instead of tackling his book, he reads one author after another in order to make absolutely certain that he is not going to tread on their private property. And the more he reads the more disdainful he becomes. None of them are satisfying; none of them arrive at that degree of perfection which he has imposed on himself. And forgetting completely that he has not written as much as a chapter he talks about them condescendingly, quite as though there existed a shelf of books bearing his name, books which everyone is familiar with and the titles of which it is therefore superfluous to mention.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 2114-2120</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;I have adjusted myself so well to his monologues that without interrupting my own reveries I make whatever comment is required automatically, the moment I hear his voice die out. It is a duet, and like most duets moreover in that one listens attentively only for the signal which announces the advent of one’s own voice.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 2157-2159</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;But now, since he had felt the touch of death, he wanted to display his comradeship. He wanted to weep, if possible, to show that he was a regular guy. And Joe and I, who knew Peckover well and who knew also that he wasn’t worth a good goddamn, even a few tears, we felt annoyed with this drunken sentimentality. We wanted to tell him so too, but with a guy like that you can’t afford to be honest; you have to buy a wreath and go to the funeral and pretend that you’re miserable. And you have to congratulate him too for the delicate obituary he’s written. He’ll be carrying his delicate little obituary around with him for months, praising the shit out of himself for the way he handled the situation. We felt all that, Joe and I, without saying a word to each other. We just stood there and listened with a murderous, silent contempt. And as soon as we could break away we did so; we left him there at the bar blubbering to himself over his Pernod.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 2180-2187</div></div><p>This is a work of art. I&rsquo;m glad I stuck around for this. As luck would have it, a good friend of mine was reading this book at nearly exactly the same time and expressed frustration with the first ninety or so page, announcing that he planned to give up on it. I sent him the quote above and he soldiered on and was happy for it.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;There are people in this world who cut such a grotesque figure that even death renders them ridiculous. And the more horrible the death the more ridiculous they seem. It’s no use trying to invest the end with a little dignity—you have to be a liar and a hypocrite to discover anything tragic in their going. And since we didn’t have to put on a false front we could laugh about the incident to our heart’s content. We laughed all night about it, and in between times we vented our scorn and disgust for the guys upstairs, the fatheads who were trying to persuade themselves, no doubt, that Peckover was a fine fellow and that his death was a catastrophe.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 2188-2193</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;We haven’t any passion either of us. And as for her, one might as well expect her to produce a diamond necklace as to show a spark of passion. But there’s the fifteen francs and something has to be done about it. It’s like a state of war: the moment the condition is precipitated nobody thinks about anything but peace, about getting it over with. And yet nobody has the courage to lay down his arms, to say, “I’m fed up with it… I’m through.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 2245-2249</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;It’s like a man in the trenches again: he doesn’t know any more why he should go on living, because if he escapes now he’ll only be caught later, but he goes on just the same, and even though he has the soul of a cockroach and has admitted as much to himself, give him a gun or a knife or even just his bare nails, and he’ll go on slaughtering and slaughtering, he’d slaughter a million men rather than stop and ask himself why.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 2265-2268</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;This life which, if I were still a man with pride, honor, ambition and so forth, would seem like the bottom rung of degradation, I welcome now, as an invalid welcomes death. It’s a negative reality, just like death—a sort of heaven without the pain and terror of dying. In this chthonian world the only thing of importance is orthography and punctuation. It doesn’t matter what the nature of the calamity is, only whether it is spelled right.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 2327-2330</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;How could I have foreseen, in America, with all those firecrackers they put up your ass to give you pep and courage, that the ideal position for a man of my temperament was to look for orthographic mistakes? Over there you think of nothing but becoming President of the United States some day.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 2354-2355</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;[…] I get to thinking about another way of life, get to wondering if it would make a difference having a young, restless creature by my side. The trouble is I can hardly remember what she looks like, nor even how it feels to have my arms around her. Everything that belongs to the past seems to have fallen into the sea; I have memories, but the images have lost their vividness, they seem dead and desultory, like time-bitten mummies stuck in a quagmire.</p>
<p>&ldquo;If I try to recall my life in New York I get a few splintered fragments, nightmarish and covered with verdigris. It seems as if my own proper existence had come to an end somewhere, just where exactly I can’t make out. I’m not an American any more, nor a New Yorker, and even less a European, or a Parisian. I haven’t any allegiance, any responsibilities, any hatreds, any worries, any prejudices, any passion. I’m neither for nor against. I’m a neutral.&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 2387-2394</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;[…] we get to talking about the condition of things with that enthusiasm which only those who bear no active part in life can muster. What seems strange to me sometimes, when I crawl into bed, is that all this enthusiasm is engendered just to kill time, just to annihilate the three-quarters of an hour which it requires to walk from the office to Montparnasse. We might have the most brilliant, the most feasible ideas for the amelioration of this or that, but there is no vehicle to hitch them to.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 2394-2397</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;To walk from the Rue Lafayette to the boulevard is like running the gauntlet; they attach themselves to you like barnacles, they eat into you like ants, they coax, wheedle, cajole, implore, beseech, they try it out in German, English, Spanish, they show you their torn hearts and their busted shoes, and long after you’ve chopped the tentacles away, long after the fizz and sizzle has died out, the fragrance of the lavabo clings to your nostrils—it is the odor of the Parfum de Danse whose effectiveness is guaranteed only for a distance of twenty centimeters.</p>
<p>&ldquo;One could piss away a whole lifetime in that little stretch between the boulevard and the Rue Lafayette. Every bar is alive, throbbing, the dice loaded; the cashiers are perched like vultures on their high stools and the money they handle has a human stink to it. There is no equivalent in the Banque de France for the blood money that passes currency here, the money that glistens with human sweat, that passes like a forest fire from hand to hand and leaves behind it a smoke and stench.&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 2461-2469</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;You don’t think that a pimp is inhuman, I hope? A pimp has his private grief and misery too, don’t you forget. Perhaps he would like nothing better than to stand on the corner every night with a pair of white dogs and watch them piddle. Perhaps he would like it if, when he opened the door, he would see her there reading the Paris-Soir, her eyes already a little heavy with sleep. Perhaps it isn’t so wonderful, when he bends over his Lucienne, to taste another man’s breath. Better maybe to have only three francs in your pocket and a pair of white dogs that piddle on the corner than to taste those bruised lips.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 2472-2477</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;I am speaking naturally of that world which is peculiar to the big cities, the world of men and women whose last drop of juice has been squeezed out by the machine—the martyrs of modern progress.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 2515-2516</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;I caught for the first time the profound meaning of those interior stills which manifest their presence through the exorcism of sight and touch. Standing on the threshold of that world which Matisse has created I re-experienced the power of that revelation which had permitted Proust to so deform the picture of life that only those who, like himself, are sensible to the alchemy of sound and sense, are capable of transforming the negative reality of life into the substantial and significant outlines of art.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 2522-2525</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Vividly now I recall how the glint and sparkle of light caroming from the massive chandeliers splintered and ran blood, flecking the tips of the waves that beat monotonously on the dull gold outside the windows.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 2526-2527</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;With the close of day, pain rising like a mist from the earth, sorrow closing in, shuttering the endless vista of sea and sky. Two waxen hands lying listlessly on the bedspread and along the pale veins the fluted murmur of a shell repeating the legend of its birth.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 2529-2531</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;By whatever vision one passes there is the odor and the sound of voyage. It is impossible to gaze at even a corner of his dreams without feeling the lift of the wave and the cool of flying spray. He stands at the helm peering with steady blue eyes into the portfolio of time.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 2533-2535</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;On its wobbly axle the wheel rolls steadily downhill; there are no brakes, no ball bearings, no balloon tires. The wheel is falling apart, but the revolution is intact.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 2572-2573</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;I tried to look earnest, but I only succeeded in looking pathetic. They don’t want to see sad faces in Russia; they want you to be cheerful, enthusiastic, light-hearted, optimistic. It sounded very much like America to me. I wasn’t born with this kind of enthusiasm.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 2626-2628</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;[…] because in that world, just as in every world, the greater part of what happens is just muck and filth, sordid as any garbage can, only they are lucky enough to be able to put covers over the can.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 2682-2684</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;She wouldn’t remember that at a certain corner I had stopped to pick up her hairpin, or that, when I bent down to tie her laces, I remarked the spot on which her foot had rested and that it would remain there forever, even after the cathedrals had been demolished and the whole Latin civilization wiped out forever and ever.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 2731-2734</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;[…] suddenly realized the impossibility of ever revealing to her that Paris which I had gotten to know, the Paris whose arrondissements are undefined, a Paris that has never existed except by virtue of my loneliness, my hunger for her. Such a huge Paris! It would take a lifetime to explore it again. This Paris, to which I alone had the key, hardly lends itself to a tour, even with the best of intentions; it is a Paris that has to be lived, that has to be experienced each day in a thousand different forms of torture, a Paris that grows inside you like a cancer, and grows and grows until you are eaten away by&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 2737-2741</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;it is here that one reads again the books of his youth and the enigmas take on new meanings, one for every white hair.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 2770-2770</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The streets were my refuge. And no man can understand the glamor of the streets until he is obliged to take refuge in them, until he has become a straw that is tossed here and there by every zephyr that blows.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 2778-2779</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;it is that which makes certain houses appear like the guardians of secret crimes and their blind windows like the empty sockets of eyes that have seen too much.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 2812-2814</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;He liked to dance, he liked good wines, and he liked women. That he liked Byron also, and Victor Hugo, one could forgive; he was only a few years out of college and he had plenty of time ahead of him to be cured of such tastes. What he had that I liked was a sense of adventure.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 2925-2926</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;When we entered the whorehouse on the Quai Voltaire, after he had flung himself on the divan and rung for girls and for drinks, he was still paddling up the river with Kurtz, and only when the girls had flopped on the bed beside him and stuffed his mouth with kisses did he cease his divagations.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 3047-3049</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Sex everywhere: it was slopping over, a neap tide that swept the props from under the city.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 3061-3061</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;But then she was so drunk that when she tumbled out of the cab she began to weep and before any one could stop her she had begun to peel her clothes off. The driver brought her home that way, half-naked, and when Jimmie saw the condition she was in he was so furious with her that he took his razor strop and he belted the piss out of her, and she liked it, the bitch that she was. “Do it some more!” she begged, down on her knees as she was and clutching him around the legs with her two arms. But Jimmie had enough of it. “You’re a dirty old sow!” he said and with his foot he gave her a shove in the guts that took the wind out of her—and a bit of her sexy nonsense too.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 3095-3100</div></div><p>Ludicrous teenage fan fiction.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;When the sun comes out, any spot in Paris can look beautiful; and if there is a bistro with an awning rolled down, a few tables on the sidewalk and colored drinks in the glasses, then people look altogether human. And they are human—the finest people in the world when the sun shines! So intelligent, so indolent, so carefree! It’s a crime to herd such a people into barracks, to put them through exercises, to grade them into privates and sergeants and colonels and what not.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 3292-3296</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;About three in the morning Fillmore staggers in… alone. Lit up like an ocean liner, and making a noise like a blind man with his cracked cane. Tap, tap, tap, down the weary lane. … “Going straight to bed,” he says, as he marches past me. “Tell you all about it tomorrow.” He goes inside to his room and throws back the covers. I hear him groaning—“what a woman! what a woman!” In a second he’s out again, with his hat on and the cracked cane in his hand. “I knew something like that was going to happen. She’s crazy!”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 3330-3334</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;These are sunny thoughts inspired by a vermouth cassis at the Place de la Trinité. A Saturday afternoon and a “misfire” book in my hands. Everything swimming in a divine mucopus. The drink leaves a bitter herbish taste in my mouth, the lees of our Great Western civilization,&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 3575-3577</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;[…] now and then we encounter pages that explode, pages that wound and sear, that wring groans and tears and curses, know that they come from a man with his back up, a man whose only defenses left are his words and his words are always stronger than the lying, crushing weight of the world, stronger than all the racks and wheels which the cowardly invent to crush out the miracle of personality.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 3629-3632</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The earth is not an arid plateau of health and comfort, but a great sprawling female with velvet torso that swells and heaves with ocean billows; she squirms beneath a diadem of sweat and anguish. Naked and sexed she rolls among the clouds in the violet light of the stars. All of her, from her generous breasts to her gleaming thighs, blazes with furious ardor.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 3648-3650</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;When I reflect that the task which the artist implicitly sets himself is to overthrow existing values, to make of the chaos about him an order which is his own, to sow strife and ferment so that by the emotional release those who are dead may be restored to life, then it is that I run with joy to the great and imperfect ones, their confusion nourishes me, their stuttering is like divine music to my ears.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 3688-3690</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;In the street I had often passed a priest with a little prayer book in his hands laboriously memorizing his lines. Idiot, I would say to myself, and let it go at that. In the street one meets with all forms of dementia and the priest is by no means the most striking. Two thousand years of it has deadened us to the idiocy of it. However, when you are suddenly transported to the very midst of his realm, when you see the little world in which the priest functions like an alarm clock, you are apt to have entirely different sensations.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 3775-3779</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;I was taking it in as best I could in the dim light. Fascinating and stupefying at the same time. All over the civilized world, I thought to myself. All over the world. Marvelous. Rain or shine, hail, sleet, snow, thunder, lightning, war, famine, pestilence—makes not the slightest difference. Always the same mean temperature, the same mumbo jumbo, the same high-laced shoes and the little angels of the Lord singing soprano and alto. Near the exit a little slot-box—to carry on the heavenly work. So that God’s blessing may rain down upon king and country and battleships and high explosives and tanks and airplanes, so that the worker may have more strength in his arms, strength to slaughter horses and cows and sheep, strength to punch holes in iron girders, strength to sew buttons on other people’s pants, strength to sell carrots and sewing machines and automobiles, strength to exterminate insects and clean stables and unload garbage cans and scrub lavatories, strength to write headlines and chop tickets in the subway. Strength… strength. All that lip chewing and hornswoggling just to furnish a little strength!&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 3787-3795</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;All over the States I wandered, and into Canada and Mexico. The same story everywhere. If you want bread you’ve got to get in harness, get in lock step. Over all the earth a gray desert, a carpet of steel and cement. Production! More nuts and bolts, more barbed wire, more dog biscuits, more lawn mowers, more ball bearings, more high explosives, more tanks, more poison gas, more soap, more toothpaste, more newspapers, more education, more churches, more libraries, more museums. Forward!&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 3848-3851</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Forward! Forward without pity, without compassion, without love, without forgiveness. Ask no quarter and give none! More battleships, more poison gas, more high explosives! More gonococci! More streptococci! More bombing machines! More and more of it—until the whole fucking works is blown to smithereens, and the earth with it!&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 3859-3861</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;halfassed&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 3870-3870</div></div><p>This was incorrectly hyphenated as hal-fassed.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;I felt free and chained at the same time—like one feels just before election, when all the crooks have been nominated and you are beseeched to vote for the right man.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 3893-3894</div></div><p>So has it always been. Nothing really new under the sun, not where it matters. There it&rsquo;s not allowed to change.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;[…] they belonged to that category of colorless individuals who make up the world of engineers, architects, dentists, pharmacists, teachers, etc. There was nothing to distinguish them from the clods whom they would later wipe their boots on. They were zeros in every sense of the word, ciphers who form the nucleus of a respectable and lamentable citizenry. They ate with their heads down and were always the first to clamor for a second helping. They slept soundly and never complained; they were neither gay nor miserable. The indifferent ones whom Dante consigned to the vestibule of Hell. The upper-crusters.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 3936-3941</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Here was I, supposedly to spread the gospel of Franco-American amity—the emissary of a corpse who, after he had plundered right and left, after he had caused untold suffering and misery, dreamed of establishing universal peace.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 3960-3961</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;They asked all sorts of questions, as though they had never learned a damned thing. I let them fire away. I taught them to ask still more ticklish questions. Ask anything!—that was my motto. I’m here as a plenipotentiary from the realm of free spirits. I’m here to create a fever and a ferment.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 3965-3967</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;I was always hungry myself, since it was impossible for me to go to breakfast which was handed out at some ungodly hour of the morning, just when the bed was getting toasty.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 3973-3974</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The whole town looked a bit crazy when the blue of evening settled over it. You could walk up and down the main drive any Thursday in the week till doomsday and never meet an expansive soul. Sixty or seventy thousand people—perhaps more—wrapped in woolen underwear and nowhere to go and nothing to do. Turning out mustard by the carload. Female orchestras grinding out The Merry Widow.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 3990-3993</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The silence descends in volcanic chutes. Yonder, in the barren hills, rolling onward toward the great metallurgical regions, the locomotives are pulling their merchant products. Over steel and iron beds they roll, the ground sown with slag and cinders and purple ore. In the baggage car, kelps, fishplate, rolled iron, sleepers, wire rods, plates and sheets, laminated articles, hot rolled hoops, splints and mortar carriages, and Zorès ore. The wheels U-80 millimeters or over. Pass splendid specimens of Anglo-Norman architecture, pass pedestrians and pederasts, open hearth furnaces, basic Bessemer mills, dynamos and transformers, pig iron castings and steel ingots.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 4110-4115</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;I went immediately to the hotel at 1 bis, where Carl was staying. He came to the door stark naked. It was his night off and there was a cunt in the bed as usual. “Don’t mind her,” he says, “she’s asleep. If you need a lay you can take her on. She’s not bad.” He pulls the covers back to show me what she looks like. However, I wasn’t thinking about a lay right away.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 4126-4129</div></div><p>Seriously? Can&rsquo;t tell if kidding. If not kidding, this has <em>not</em> aged well. I&rsquo;m not triggered, though. (I noted on another passage above that it was &ldquo;Ludicrous teenage fan fiction&rdquo;; this falls into the same category).</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;I often used to think, when I heard him rave about glorious France, about liberty and all that crap, what it would have sounded like to a French workman, could he have understood Fillmore’s words. No wonder they think we’re all crazy. We are crazy to them. We’re just a pack of children. Senile idiots. What we call life is a five-and-ten-cent store romance. That enthusiasm underneath—what is it? That cheap optimism which turns the stomach of any ordinary European? It’s illusion. No, illusion’s too good a word for it. Illusion means something. No, it’s not that—it’s delusion. It’s sheer delusion, that’s what.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 4388-4393</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;It’s a wonderful thing, for half an hour, to have money in your pocket and piss it away like a drunken sailor. You feel as though the world is yours. And the best part of it is, you don’t know what to do with it. You can sit back and let the meter run wild, you can let the wind blow through your hair, you can stop and have a drink, you can give a big tip, and you can swagger off as though it were an everyday occurrence. But you can’t create a revolution. You can’t wash all the dirt out of your belly.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 4517-4520</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Passing a beer garden I saw a group of cyclists sitting at a table. I took a seat nearby and ordered a demi.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 4524-4525</div></div>      </div>
      </div>
        <div class="footer">
    <div class="footer-data"><div class="footer-links"><ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/contact.php" title="">Contact</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/support.php" title="">Support</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/privacy.php" title="">Privacy</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/rights.php" title="">Rights</a></li></ul></div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="copyright">Copyright (c) 1999-2026 earthli.com. All Rights Reserved.</div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="versions">Powered by <ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore/app_news.php">earthli News 3.7</a></li><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore" title="">earthli WebCore&trade; 3.7</a></li></ul></div></div>    </div>
      </div>
  </div>  </body>
</html>
]]>
  </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
      <title type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[The Last Man by Mary Shelley (1826; read in 2020)]]>
  </title>
    <id>https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=4040</id>
    <link href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=4040"/>
    <updated>2021-01-02T13:04:45+01:00</updated>
    <author>
        <name type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[Marco von Ballmoos]]>
  </name>
      <uri>https://earthli.com/users/marco</uri>
    </author>
      <summary type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<blockquote class="quote abstract "><div>Disclaimer: these are notes I took while reading this book. They include citations I found interesting or enlightening or particularly well-written. In some cases, I&rsquo;ve pointed out which of these applies to which citation; in others, I have not. Any benefit you gain from reading these notes is... [<a class="complete-text-link" href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=4040">More</a>]</div></blockquote>]]>
  </summary>
      <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<html lang="en">
  <head>
    <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/themes/ice.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/fonts/raleway.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/core/medium.css">
  </head>
  <body>
<div class="style-controls">  <div class="page">
    <div class="page-body">
<div class="info-box-top">
<p>
Published by <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_user.php?name=marco" title="Marco von Ballmoos" class="visible">marco</a> on <span class="date-time">2. Jan 2021 13:04:45 (GMT-5)</span>
</p>
</div>
      <div class="text-flow wide">
  <blockquote class="quote abstract "><div>Disclaimer: these are notes I took while reading this book. They include citations I found interesting or enlightening or particularly well-written. In some cases, I&rsquo;ve pointed out which of these applies to which citation; in others, I have not. Any benefit you gain from reading these notes is purely incidental to the purpose they serve of reminding me what I once read. Please see Wikipedia for a summary if I&rsquo;ve failed to provide one sufficient for your purposes. If my notes serve to trigger an interest in this book, then I&rsquo;m happy for you.</div></blockquote><p>This feels like another novel from the 19th century that was written serially, for two reasons. In the first place, it feels quite padded out, with each long chapter coming to a mini-plot resolution. In the second place, the book is actually quite clearly two separate volumes, with on of the main heroes of the first book Raymond dying in a conflagration in a plague-filled Constantinople.</p>
<p>The first half is essentially a bullshit fairy tale, ostensibly set in 2092, but with no discernible advancements over the early 19th century, when the book was written. Everything works out without conflict or even much effort on the part of the protagonists. Everyone is happy with all of the results. They&rsquo;re all rich and smart and erudite and powerful and beautiful and just…barf. The second half is the actual pandemic-destroying-all-but-the-last-man book I&rsquo;d set out to read.</p>
<p>But I&rsquo;m getting ahead of myself. The novel begins with the story of Lionel and his sister Perdita, who live in the countryside in Cumberland with their mother in more-or-less abject poverty. They&rsquo;d never met their father, who was a jovial ne&rsquo;er-do-well addicted to gambling who&rsquo;d befriended the king and was, therefor, protected to a good degree.</p>
<p>Shelley sets the tone of the first half of the novel with countless examples of lovely, well-written passages that quickly grow almost tedious to read. For example, the following passage describes Lionel&rsquo;s father as a charming but less-than-sensible man.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;My father was one of those men on whom nature had bestowed to prodigality the envied gifts of wit and imagination, and then left his bark of life to be impelled by these winds, without adding reason as the rudder, or judgment as the pilot for the voyage.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 6</div></div><p>He remains protected, that is, until the king marries, after which the queen drives a wedge between the king and his incorrigible friend. She eventually delivers an ultimatum—cut off the sponge of suffer my wrath. The king obliges and Lionel&rsquo;s father is driven into exile, having no means of support anymore. The king, in turn, gives up the monarchy, ushering in a republic in its place. The queen is beside herself with scorn and anger.</p>
<p>Lionel grows up to be a strapping man, head of a band of scoundrels who ravage the countryside, stealing what they need. The king&rsquo;s other son Adrian moves to Cumberland, butting up against an angry and retributive Lionel, whose heart is reluctantly softened until he flips 180º and expresses lifelong devotion to the man whom he&rsquo;d long considered an arch-enemy. [1]</p>
<p>We are introduced to Raymond, a hero of the Greek-Turkish wars as well as Evadne, a Greek Princess who loves him. Adrian, in turn, loves Evadne. Raymond loves Adrian&rsquo;s sister, Idris. Raymond loves Perdita, and Lionel loves Idris. All clear? These are all respectively strapping or lovely, brilliant, rich people, all in love with one another in a seemingly Gordian knot of unrequited love.</p>
<p>This next citation is just a small snippet of Raymond rambling on for paragraphs about the depth and strength of his love (see more examples from pages 64-77 below).</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Yet you do love me; I feel and know that you do, and thence I draw my most cherished hopes. If pride guided you, or even reason, you might well reject me. Do so; if your high heart, incapable of my infirmity of purpose, refuses to bend to the lowness of mine.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 64</div></div><p>This is effusive and overly flowery prose, depicting yet another improbable love triangle. It reminds me very much of the over-the-top love stories in <em>Atlas Shrugged</em> that described a love flaming so hot as to admit no doubt or compromise or even slight difference of opinion. They are lovely examples of poetic prose but, after a while, it&rsquo;s hard not to feel she would describe taking out the trash in the same manner.</p>
<p>Also indicative of the time but now difficult to connect with is the subservience of woman, not just as forced by society, but also as fervently hoped for by the woman, who <em>chooses</em> a secondary role to a man who deems as having completely earned her worship.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The overflowing warmth of her heart, by making love a plant of deep root and stately growth, had attuned her whole soul to the reception of happiness, when she found in Raymond all that could adorn love and satisfy her imagination.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 125</div></div><p>Lionel moves to Vienna for a while, to work under the tutelage of Freud, while England starts to struggle with its republic. Raymond is agitating to move back to a monarchy, with himself as Lord Protector, which is basically king. Instead of causing issues among his friends, they all think that this is a great idea—because Raymond is so singularly awesome. Much of the rest of the parliament is similarly convinced, especially whenever Raymond opens his brilliant and loquacious mouth.</p>
<p>Soon after, they all become embroiled in the war in Greece. Rumors of Raymond&rsquo;s death are followed by Raymond&rsquo;s actual death and Perdita&rsquo;s subsequent suicide (she obviously had no other reason to live). Adrian and Lionel return home to find that the plague that had begun in Asia and had just started to touch Turkey and Greece has followed them to England.</p>
<p>This is the first part of the book, with only a hint of plague. The second part eloquently describes the plague&rsquo;s relentless eradication of humanity. I read the book to see if it, too, would provide some evidence that humanity&rsquo;s idea of how to handle a plague was no different then than it is now (and than it was in Camus&rsquo;s <em><a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3986">La Peste</a></em>). </p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;We talked of the ravages made last year by pestilence in every quarter of the world; and of the dreadful consequences of a second visitation. We discussed the best means of preventing infection, and of preserving health and activity in a large city thus afflicted—London, for instance.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 214</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Plague might not revive with the summer; but if it did, it should find us prepared. It is a part of man&rsquo;s nature to adapt itself through habit even to pain and sorrow. Pestilence had become a part of our future, our existence; it was to be guarded against, like the flooding of rivers, the encroachments of ocean, or the inclemency of the sky.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 261</div></div><p>This sounds very much like the lessons at least some of us had learned by the end of 2020—although I sometimes seriously question whether we&rsquo;ve lost some capacity for dealing with society-wide issues. Our laser-like focus on individual liberty and luxury leaves little to no room for considering the more foreboding calculus of dependencies and conflicts between unequally represented interests.</p>
<p>Our notion of liberty often devolves into the strong surviving on the backs of the weak (dog eat dog), the strong using their mostly fortuitously acquired and largely unearned power to fortify <em>and substantiate with myth</em> their position at the top of the heap.</p>
<p>At any rate, in the book (as in reality), the remaining populace—either not exposed or more resistant—squabble and fight over the remaining resources and power centers. But it is hopeless, as the plague is unquestionably worse than anything humans can do to one another. Still, armies are raised, with the plague rejoicing at the close quarters and squalid conditions. </p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;At length the plague, slow-footed, but sure in her noiseless advance, destroyed the illusion, invading the congregation of the elect, and showering promiscuous death among them.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 396</div></div><p>Luckily, the main characters are largely untouched by the plague—at least until much later. This is another literary device she uses without explanation: she protects her characters from the ravages of the plague until a sufficiently dramatic end can be found for them.</p>
<p>This is, of course, artistic license and largely implausible since most of them were simultaneously selfless in caring for the sick day-in and day-out. Yet, none fell to the plague. Were we to assume it was because they were so good? That the plague couldn&rsquo;t get through the shield of their benevolence?</p>
<p>Lionel, Idris, and Adrian—now Lord Protector—rally the remains of humanity in England and strike out for warmer climes. The winters are brutal in England and humans can no longer survive there. Although the virus is worse in the summer, they still feel it would be better to move southward. There are trials and tribulations and they barely make it to the coast of France in their boats. There, they discover that those who preceded them had split into factions: on one side is Adrian and his benevolence; on the other is a brutal leader selling a story of protection from the plague in exchange for unquestioning fealty.</p>
<p>Lionel is integral in remediating this problem and the remains of humanity, once again united in purpose, continue to Switzerland, where they hope that the cool heights will provide agricultural plenty while protecting them from the estival ravages of the plague. The plague has other ideas. Only four survive the trek across France to Switzerland: Lionel, Adrian, and Raymond&rsquo;s two children, Clara and Evelyn). Lionel dwells a bit too pointedly on how lovely and smart Clara is—with intimations of rekindling humanity with her.</p>
<p>They shift to Milan and Como, spending several lovely years there, with only Evelyn succumbing to Typhus rather than the plague. </p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;[…] one by one, beneath the ice-caves, beside the waters springing from the thawed snows of a thousand winters, another and yet another of the remnant of the race of Man, closed their eyes for ever to the light.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 413</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;"Thus are we left,&ldquo; said Adrian, &ldquo;two melancholy blasted trees, where once a forest waved. We are left to mourn, and pine, and die.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 416</div></div><p>Clara decides she needs to see where her father is buried in Greece. Lacking anything else to do, they endeavor across the Adriatic from Venice, but are shipwrecked, drowning Adrian and Clara. Lionel survives. We follow him on his physical and philosophical peregrinations, leaving him a few years later, after he&rsquo;d ascertained to a great degree of certainty that he was, indeed, the last man on Earth.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Yellow lightnings played around the vast dome of Mont Blanc, silent as the snow-clad rock they illuminated; all was bare, wild, and sublime, while the singing of the pines in melodious murmurings added a gentle interest to the rough magnificence.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 414</div></div><p>Imagine knowing that yours would be the last sentience to behold such a thing, that nature would present such shows for long eons, irrespective of observers. That the clockwork continues without us, as easily as with us. Not that we have become irrelevant, but that we always were.</p>
<p><hr></p>
<div class="footnote-reference"><span id="footnote_DRAFTABLE_ENTRY_4040_1_body" class="footnote-number">[1]</span> This sort of jarring flip-flop is a common feature. There&rsquo;s not a lot of subtlety to the emotions expressed by any of the characters. It&rsquo;s like humanity viewed through the lens of a teenager: everything is literally the best or the worst ever.</div><div class="footnote-reference"><span id="footnote_DRAFTABLE_ENTRY_4040_2_body" class="footnote-number">[2]</span> Idris never makes it off the island, and much effort and time is expended in making sure that her body is entombed in Windsor Castle, as if anyone at all cares where her plague-ridden corpse is interred, especially considering none of them will ever return to it.</div><h2>Citations</h2><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Di mie tenere frondi altro lavoro   Credea mostrarte; e qual fero pianeta   Ne&rsquo; nvidio insieme, o mio nobil tesoro?&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 5</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;My father was one of those men on whom nature had bestowed to prodigality the envied gifts of wit and imagination, and then left his bark of life to be impelled by these winds, without adding reason as the rudder, or judgment as the pilot for the voyage.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 6</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;I lived with a farmer whose house was built higher up among the hills: a dark crag rose behind it, and, exposed to the north, the snow lay in its crevices the summer through.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 14</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;We are not formed for enjoyment; and, however we may be attuned to the reception of pleasureable emotion, disappointment is the never-failing pilot of our life&rsquo;s bark, and ruthlessly carries us on to the shoals.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 31</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;He gave not only a brief denial to his mother&rsquo;s schemes, but published his intention of using his influence to diminish the power of the aristocracy, to effect a greater equalization of wealth and privilege, and to introduce a perfect system of republican government into England. At first his mother treated his theories as the wild ravings of inexperience. But they were so systematically arranged, and his arguments so well supported, that though still in appearance incredulous, she began to fear him. She tried to reason with him, and finding him inflexible, learned to hate him.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 41</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Truly disappointment is the guardian deity of human life; she sits at the threshold of unborn time, and marshals the events as they come forth.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 43</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;&rdquo;Happy are dreamers,&ldquo; he continued, &ldquo;so that they be not awakened! Would I could dream! but &lsquo;broad and garish day&rsquo; is the element in which I live; the dazzling glare of reality inverts the scene for me. Even the ghost of friendship has departed, and love&rdquo;——He broke off; nor could I guess whether the disdain that curled his lip was directed against the passion, or against himself for being its slave.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 45</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Raymond continued, &ldquo;I will not act a part with you, dear girl, or appear other than what I am, weak and unworthy, more fit to excite your disdain than your love. Yet you do love me; I feel and know that you do, and thence I draw my most cherished hopes. If pride guided you, or even reason, you might well reject me. Do so; if your high heart, incapable of my infirmity of purpose, refuses to bend to the lowness of mine. Turn from me, if you will,—if you can. If your whole soul does not urge you to forgive me—if your entire heart does not open wide its door to admit me to its very centre, forsake me, never speak to me again. I, though sinning against you almost beyond remission, I also am proud; there must be no reserve in your pardon—no drawback to the gift of your affection.&rdquo;&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 64</div></div><p>This is effusive and overly flowery prose, depicting yet another improbable love triangle. It reminds me very much of the over-the-top love stories in Atlas Shrugged. Flaming so hot as to.admit no doubt or compromise or even slight difference of opinion.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Oh my pen! haste thou to write what was, before the thought of what is, arrests the hand that guides thee.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 77</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;But you live, my Idris, even now you move before me! There was a glade, O reader! a grassy opening in the wood; the retiring trees left its velvet expanse as a temple for love; the silver Thames bounded it on one side, and a willow bending down dipt in the water its Naiad hair, dishevelled by the wind&rsquo;s viewless hand.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 77</div></div><p>This is a lovely example, but I feel she would describe taking out the trash in the same manner.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Adrian was on horseback; he rode up to the carriage, and his gaiety, in addition to that of Raymond, dispelled my sister&rsquo;s melancholy. We entered London in the evening, and went to our several abodes near Hyde Park.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 89</div></div><p>A book about the richest possible people. Never worked a day in their lives.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;"For my part,&ldquo; said I, &ldquo;I am too well convinced of the worth of our friend, and the rich harvest of benefits that all England would reap from his Protectorship, to deprive my countrymen of such a blessing, if he consent to bestow it on them.&rdquo;&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 91</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;in dragging a poor visionary from the clouds to surround him with the fire-works and blasts of earthly grandeur, instead of heavenly rays and airs?&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 91</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Although, when I was informed of this scheme, I was bitterly offended by the small attention which Raymond paid to my sister&rsquo;s feelings, I was led by reflection to consider, that he acted under the force of such strong excitement, as to take from him the consciousness, and, consequently, the guilt of a fault. If he had permitted us to witness his agitation, he would have been more under the guidance of reason; but his struggles for the shew of composure, acted with such violence on his nerves, as to destroy his power of self-command.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 97</div></div><p>This is how you excuse a mental abuser.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;In fact, now that the idea of contest was dismissed, all hearts returned to their former respect and admiration of our accomplished friend. Each felt, that England had never seen a Protector so capable of fulfilling the arduous duties of that high office. One voice made of many voices, resounded through the chamber; it syllabled the name of Raymond.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 98</div></div><p>Such a bullshit fairy tale. Everything works out without conflict or even effort. Everyone happy in the end. Rich and powerful and beautiful and just. Barf.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;In the midst of such wretchedness as must soon have destroyed her, one thought only was matter of consolation. She lived in the same country, breathed the same air as Raymond.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 110</div></div><p>Jesus, you can&rsquo;t claim that this any better than Ayn Rand.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;His activity was fed in wholesome measure, without either exhaustion or satiety; his taste and genius found worthy expression in each of the modes human beings have invented to encage and manifest the spirit of beauty; the goodness of his heart made him never weary of conducing to the well-being of his fellow-creatures; his magnificent spirit, and aspirations for the respect and love of mankind, now received fruition; true, his exaltation was temporary; perhaps it were better that it should be so. Habit would not dull his sense of the enjoyment of power; nor struggles, disappointment and defeat await the end of that which would expire at its maturity.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 116</div></div><p>Lay it on a little thicker. There is literally no plot: just endless pages of one formulation after another depicting Raymond&rsquo;s unquestionable and nearly infinitely faceted awesomeness as well as Perdita&rsquo;s depth of love for him and her rapture in having landed him. This reads like a schoolgirls diary.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;During the early years of their union, the inequality of her temper, and yet unsubdued self-will which tarnished her character, had been a slight drawback to the fulness of his sentiment.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 116</div></div><p>Just wow.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;During the early years of their union, the inequality of her temper, and yet unsubdued self-will which tarnished her character, had been a slight drawback to the fulness of his sentiment. Now that unchanged serenity, and gentle compliance were added to her other qualifications, his respect equalled his love.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 116</div></div><p>Words fail me.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;[…] she conjectured that some circumstance connected with his high place, had occasioned this mystery. She was startled and pained. She began to count the long days, and months, and years which must elapse, before he would be restored to a private station, and unreservedly to her.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 117</div></div><p>This is mental illness.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;His course was speedily decided upon. If the worst befell; if she learnt the truth, he would neither stand her reproaches, or the anguish of her altered looks. He would forsake her, England, his friends, the scenes of his youth, the hopes of coming time, he would seek another country, and in other scenes begin life again.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 118</div></div><p>Obviously a well-thought-out, measured, mature, and sane reaction.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;"you have secrets, Raymond; where have you been lately, whom have you seen, what do you conceal from me?—why am I banished from your confidence? Yet this is not it—I do not intend to entrap you with questions—one will suffice—am I completely a wretch?&rdquo;&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 119</div></div><p>Assume the worst, of course, that absolutely everything has been a lie.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Do you think that I will be questioned, and my replies disdainfully set aside? Do you think that I will be suspected, perhaps watched, cross-questioned, and disbelieved? I am not yet fallen so low; my honour is not yet so tarnished. You have loved me; I adored you. But all human sentiments come to an end. Let our affection expire—but let it not be exchanged for distrust and recrimination. Heretofore we have been friends—lovers—let us not become enemies, mutual spies. I cannot live the object of suspicion—you cannot believe me—let us part!&rdquo; &ldquo;Exactly so,&rdquo; cried Perdita, &ldquo;I knew that it would come to this! Are we not already parted?&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 120</div></div><p>This is how super-smart people comport themselves. Do not question their ways.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;This contention is unworthy of both of us; and I confess that I am weary of replying to charges at once unfounded and unkind.&rdquo;&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 122</div></div><p>The best defense is a good offense.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The overflowing warmth of her heart, by making love a plant of deep root and stately growth, had attuned her whole soul to the reception of happiness, when she found in Raymond all that could adorn love and satisfy her imagination.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 125</div></div><p>Just in case you think that this crap stops at any point.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;"I loved you—I love you—neither anger nor pride dictates these lines; but a feeling beyond, deeper, and more unalterable than either. My affections are wounded; it is impossible to heal them:—cease then the vain endeavour, if indeed that way your endeavours tend. Forgiveness! Return! Idle words are these! I forgive the pain I endure; but the trodden path cannot be retraced.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 137</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Perdita did not oppose herself to his determination. She only stipulated to be permitted to accompany him. She had set down no rule of conduct for herself; but for her life she could not have opposed his slightest wish, or do other than acquiesce cheerfully in all his projects.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 169</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;He wished to repay the kindness of the Athenians, to keep alive the splendid associations connected with his name, and to eradicate from Europe a power which, while every other nation advanced in civilization, stood still, a monument of antique barbarism […]&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 169</div></div><p>She is, of course, referring to the West&rsquo;s age-old enemy: the ottomans/mohammedans.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The only flag among them was one which Raymond carried; he pointed with it to the gate of the city. The circle round him fell back. With angry gestures he leapt from his horse, and seizing a hatchet that hung from his saddle-bow, went with the apparent intention of battering down the opposing gate. A few men came to aid him; their numbers increased; under their united blows the obstacle was vanquished, gate, portcullis, and fence were demolished; and the wide sun-lit way, leading to the heart of the city, now lay open before them. The men shrank back; they seemed afraid of what they had already done, and stood as if they expected some Mighty Phantom to stalk in offended majesty from the opening.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 191</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;I bent over the body, and took in my hand the edge of his cloak, less altered in appearance than the human frame it clothed. I pressed it to my lips, while the rough soldiers gathered around, mourning over this worthiest prey of death, as if regret and endless lamentation could re-illumine the extinguished spark, or call to its shattered prison-house of flesh the liberated spirit.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 200</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;We talked of the ravages made last year by pestilence in every quarter of the world; and of the dreadful consequences of a second visitation. We discussed the best means of preventing infection, and of preserving health and activity in a large city thus afflicted—London, for instance.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 214</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Its pleasant places were deserted; its temples and palaces were converted into tombs; its energies, bent before towards the highest objects of human ambition, were now forced to converge to one point, the guarding against the innumerous arrows of the plague.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 216</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The plague at Athens had been preceded and caused by the contagion from the East; and the scene of havoc and death continued to be acted there, on a scale of fearful magnitude.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 216</div></div><p>The Wuhan Virus?</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;What deep and sacred emotions are excited in a father&rsquo;s bosom, when he first becomes convinced that his love for his child is not a mere instinct, but worthily bestowed, and that others, less akin, participate his approbation!&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 220</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;But how are we to judge of airs, and pronounce—in such a city plague will die unproductive; in such another, nature has provided for it a plentiful harvest? In the same way, individuals may escape ninety-nine times, and receive the death-blow at the hundredth; because bodies are sometimes in a state to reject the infection of malady, and at others, thirsty to imbibe it. These reflections made our legislators pause, before they could decide on the laws to be put in force. The evil was so wide-spreading, so violent and immedicable, that no care, no prevention could be judged superfluous, which even added a chance to our escape.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 224</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The vast cities of America, the fertile plains of Hindostan, the crowded abodes of the Chinese, are menaced with utter ruin. Where late the busy multitudes assembled for pleasure or profit, now only the sound of wailing and misery is heard. The air is empoisoned, and each human being inhales death, even while in youth and health, their hopes are in the flower. We called to mind the plague of 1348, when it was calculated that a third of mankind had been destroyed. As yet western Europe was uninfected; would it always be so?&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 226</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Bankers, merchants, and manufacturers, whose trade depended on exports and interchange of wealth, became bankrupt. Such things, when they happen singly, affect only the immediate parties; but the prosperity of the nation was now shaken by frequent and extensive losses. Families, bred in opulence and luxury, were reduced to beggary. The very state of peace in which we gloried was injurious; there were no means of employing the idle, or of sending any overplus of population out of the country.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 227</div></div><p>Not quite how it happened in America.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;It was August; so there could be small hope of relief during the heats. On the contrary, the disease gained virulence, while starvation did its accustomed work. Thousands died unlamented; for beside the yet warm corpse the mourner was stretched, made mute by death.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 228</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The labour necessary to bring the lands to this sort of culture, employed and fed the offcasts of the diminished manufactories.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 230</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;It was found necessary at last to check the spirit of sacrifice, and to remind those whose generosity proceeded to lavish waste, that, until the present state of things became permanent, of which there was no likelihood, it was wrong to carry change so far as to make a reaction difficult. Experience demonstrated that in a year or two pestilence would cease; it were well that in the mean time we should not have destroyed our fine breeds of horses, or have utterly changed the face of the ornamented portion of the country.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 230</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Ye are all going to die, I thought; already your tomb is built up around you. Awhile, because you are gifted with agility and strength, you fancy that you live: but frail is the &ldquo;bower of flesh&rdquo; that encaskets life; dissoluble the silver cord than binds you to&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 232</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;This his selected task was exchanged for the far different one of encountering the ruin caused by the convulsions of physical nature. He was incapable of meeting these evils by any comprehensive system; he had resorted to expedient after expedient, and could never be induced to put a remedy in force, till it came too late to be of use.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 234</div></div><p>That sounds more like it.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;It was not until I arrived at Brentford, that I perceived much change in the face of the country. The better sort of houses were shut up; the busy trade of the town palsied; there was an air of anxiety among the few passengers I met, and they looked wonderingly at my carriage—the first they had seen pass towards London, since pestilence sat on its high places, and possessed its busy streets. I met several funerals; they were slenderly attended by mourners, and were regarded by the spectators as omens of direst import.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 242</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Those who possessed a power of living out of London, he advised immediately to quit it, affording them the means of so doing. Others, whose trade was beneficial to the city, or who possessed no other refuge, he provided with advice for better avoiding the epidemic; relieving overloaded families, supplying the gaps made in others by death.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 244</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;I was an outcast and a vagabond, when Adrian gently threw over me the silver net of love and civilization, and linked me inextricably to human charities and human excellence. I was one, who, though an aspirant after good, and an ardent lover of wisdom, was yet unenrolled in any list of worth, when Idris, the princely born, who was herself the personification of all that was divine in woman, she who walked the earth like a poet&rsquo;s dream, as a carved goddess endued with sense, or pictured saint stepping from the canvas—she, the most worthy, chose me, and gave me herself—a priceless gift.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 254</div></div><p>Here we go again with the endless and superlative encomiums.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The poor wretch had lost his young wife and lovely infant by the plague. He was a mechanic; and, rendered unable to attend to the occupation which supplied his necessities, famine was added to his other miseries.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 255</div></div><p>This notion of &ldquo;support yourself or starve&rdquo; goes back a very long way.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Plague might not revive with the summer; but if it did, it should find us prepared. It is a part of man&rsquo;s nature to adapt itself through habit even to pain and sorrow. Pestilence had become a part of our future, our existence; it was to be guarded against, like the flooding of rivers, the encroachments of ocean, or the inclemency of the sky.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 261</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Death, which had in our younger days walked the earth like &ldquo;a thief that comes in the night,&rdquo; now, rising from his subterranean vault, girt with power, with dark banner floating, came a conqueror.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 264</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Gratitude and praise marked where her footsteps had been. Yet, when she stood in unassuming simplicity before us, playing with our children, or with girlish assiduity performing little kind offices for Idris, one wondered in what fair lineament of her pure loveliness, in what soft tone of her thrilling voice, so much of heroism, sagacity and active goodness resided.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 268</div></div><p>Oh come on. They all care for the sick and none fall to the plague. Are we to assume it&rsquo;s because they&rsquo;re so good? That the plague can&rsquo;t get through a shield of their benevolence?</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;For my own part, my exertions for the public good permitted me to observe more closely than most others, the virulence and extensive ravages of our sightless enemy. A short month has destroyed a village, and where in May the first person sickened, in June the paths were deformed by unburied corpses—the houses tenantless, no smoke arising from the chimneys; and the housewife&rsquo;s clock marked only the hour when death had been triumphant. From such scenes I have sometimes saved a deserted infant—sometimes led a young and grieving mother from the lifeless image of her first born, or drawn the sturdy labourer from childish weeping over his extinct family.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 269</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;One instance of this kind came immediately under our notice, where a high-born girl had in early youth given her heart to one of meaner extraction.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 276</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;I found Merrival, the astronomer, with her. He was far too long sighted in his view of humanity to heed the casualties of the day, and lived in the midst of contagion unconscious of its existence. This poor man, learned as La Place, guileless and unforeseeing as a child, had often been on the point of starvation, he, his pale wife and numerous offspring, while he neither felt hunger, nor observed distress. His astronomical theories absorbed him; calculations were scrawled with coal on the bare walls of his garret: a hard-earned guinea, or an article of dress, was exchanged for a book without remorse; he neither heard his children cry, nor observed his companion&rsquo;s emaciated form, and the excess of calamity was merely to him as the occurrence of a cloudy night, when he would have given his right hand to observe a celestial phenomenon.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 280</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;[…] she was amused for a moment, by the contrast between the contracted view we had so long taken of human life, and the seven league strides with which Merrival paced a coming eternity.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 282</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;There was room enough indeed in our hapless country for twice the number of invaders; but their lawless spirit instigated them to violence; they took a delight in thrusting the possessors from their houses; in seizing on some mansion of luxury, where the noble dwellers secluded themselves in fear of the plague; in forcing these of either sex to become their servants and purveyors; till, the ruin complete in one place, they removed their locust visitation to another.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 288</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;As we advanced, we were met by bands of peasantry, whose almost naked condition, whose despair and horror, told at once the fierce nature of the coming enemy. The senseless spirit of conquest and thirst of spoil blinded them, while with insane fury they deluged the country in ruin.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 290</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;You are dear to us, because you wear the frail shape of humanity; each one among you will find a friend and host among these forces. Shall man be the enemy of man, while plague, the foe to all, even now is above us, triumphing in our butchery, more cruel than her own?&rdquo;&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 293</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Families late devoted to exalting and refined pursuits, rich, blooming, and young, with diminished numbers and care-fraught hearts, huddled over a fire, grown selfish and grovelling through suffering. Without the aid of servants, it was necessary to discharge all household duties; hands unused to such labour must knead the bread, or in the absence of flour, the statesmen or perfumed courtier must undertake the butcher&rsquo;s office. Poor and rich were now equal, or rather the poor were the superior, since they entered on such tasks with alacrity and experience; while ignorance, inaptitude, and habits of repose, rendered them fatiguing to the luxurious, galling to the proud, disgustful to all whose minds, bent on intellectual improvement, held it their dearest privilege to be exempt from attending to mere animal wants.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 300</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Of old navies used to stem the giant ocean-waves betwixt Indus and the Pole for slight articles of luxury. Men made perilous journies to possess themselves of earth&rsquo;s splendid trifles, gems and gold. Human labour was wasted—human life set at nought. Now life is all that we covet; that this automaton of flesh should, with joints and springs in order, perform its functions, that this dwelling of the soul should be capable of containing its dweller. Our minds, late spread abroad through countless spheres and endless combinations of thought, now retrenched themselves behind this wall of flesh, eager to preserve its well-being only. We were surely sufficiently degraded.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 306</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;But my mother, my sick, my dear, dear mother, who never, since I was born, spoke a harsh word to me, who has been patient in many sufferings; pity her, dear Lady, she must die a miserable death if you do not pity her. People speak carelessly of her, because she is old and infirm, as if we must not all, if we are spared, become so; and then, when the young are old themselves, they will think that they ought to be taken care of.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 341</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;But with the encreased mortality this intercourse declined and ceased. Even in England itself communication from one part of the island to the other became slow and rare. No vessel stemmed the flood that divided Calais from Dover; or if some melancholy voyager, wishing to assure himself of the life or death of his relatives, put from the French shore to return among us, often the greedy ocean swallowed his little craft, or after a day or two he was infected by the disorder, and died before he could tell the tale of the desolation of France.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 364</div></div><p>No wireless no even an inkling that such a thing would be not only possible but a nearly unavoidable technological advancement two centuries hence.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;In the present instance, a worse feeling than either of these actuated the leader. He was an impostor in the most determined sense of the term. A man who had in early life lost, through the indulgence of vicious propensities, all sense of rectitude or self-esteem; and who, when ambition was awakened in him, gave himself up to its influence unbridled by any scruple.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 365</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;At length, by mere dint of rowing, we reached the French coast. The stars faded, and the grey morning cast a dim veil over the silver horns of the waning moon—the sun rose broad and red from the sea, as we walked over the sands to Calais.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 368</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;[…] it was determined that we should await the arrival of spring in our present abode, and so order our future movements as to pass the hot months in the icy vallies of Switzerland, deferring our southern progress until the ensuing autumn, if such a season was ever again to be beheld by us.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 373</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;As Henry, Emperor of Germany, lay in the snow before Pope Leo&rsquo;s gate for three winter days and nights, so did she in humility wait before the icy barriers of his closed heart, till he, the servant of love, and prince of tender courtesy, opened it wide for her admittance, bestowing, with fervency and gratitude, the tribute of filial affection she merited.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 375</div></div><p>She made a spectacle. Being a nice guy, he forgave her.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;It is a strange fact, but incontestible, that the philanthropist, who ardent in his desire to do good, who patient, reasonable and gentle, yet disdains to use other argument than truth, has less influence over men&rsquo;s minds, than he who, grasping and selfish, refuses not to adopt any means, nor awaken any passion, nor diffuse any falsehood, for the advancement of his cause.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 376</div></div><p>Principles are, at times, a heavy burden.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;She conjured me, she commanded me to leave her— &ldquo;Beware, O beware,&rdquo; she cried, &ldquo;fly while yet your escape is practicable. Now you are safe; but strange sounds and inspirations come on me at times, and if the Eternal should in awful whisper reveal to me his will, that to save my child you must be sacrificed, I would call in the satellites of him you call the tyrant; they would tear you limb from limb; nor would I hallow the death of him whom Idris loved, by a single tear.&rdquo;&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 379</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Silence, melancholy bride of death, went in procession with him from town to town through the spacious region.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 390</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Now, the old woman sat no more at the door with her distaff—the lank beggar no longer asked charity in courtier-like phrase; nor on holidays did the peasantry thread with slow grace the mazes of the dance. Silence, melancholy bride of death, went in procession with him from town to town through the spacious region.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 390</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Argument and adjuration were lost on these dastards. The continual diminution of their own numbers, effected by pestilence, added a sting to their dislike of delay; and my opposition only served to bring their resolution to a crisis. That same evening they departed towards Auxerre. Oaths, as from soldiers to their general, had been taken by them: these they broke.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 392</div></div><p>I can&rsquo;t tell if the author also thinks he&rsquo;s an idiot.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Apparently I was to lead this troop of selfish and lawless men towards Switzerland,&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 392</div></div><p>From their point of view, you&rsquo;re an an addled psychotic bent on leading everyone to destruction for purely personal reasons.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;My horse grew tired—and I, forgetful of his fatigue, still as he lagged, cheered him with my voice, and urged him with the spur. He was a gallant animal, and I did not wish to exchange him for any chance beast I might light on, leaving him never to be refound. All night we went forward; in the morning he became sensible that we approached Versailles, to reach which as his home, he mustered his flagging strength. The distance we had come was not less than fifty miles, yet he shot down the long Boulevards swift as an arrow; poor fellow, as I dismounted at the gate of the castle, he sunk on his knees, his eyes were covered with a film, he fell on his side, a few gasps inflated his noble chest, and he died.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 393</div></div><p>It seems no sacrifice is too great for his mission. He rode the horse to death.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;At length the plague, slow-footed, but sure in her noiseless advance, destroyed the illusion, invading the congregation of the elect, and showering promiscuous death among them.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 396</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;We never saw it except at evening, when his coal black steed, his mourning dress, and plume of black feathers, had a majestic and awe-striking appearance; his face, one said, who had seen it for a moment, was ashy pale; he had lingered far behind the rest of his troop, and suddenly at a turn in the road, saw the Black Spectre coming towards him; he hid himself in fear, and the horse and his rider slowly past, while the moonbeams fell on the face of the latter, displaying its unearthly hue.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 400</div></div><p>The witch king of Angmar.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;He grew giant tall to vulgar eyes; an icy atmosphere, they said, surrounded him; when he was heard, all animals shuddered, and the dying knew that their last hour was come.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 400</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;"I am afraid,&ldquo; said she, &ldquo;that it is selfish in me to have asked you to visit the old woman again, before she dies: yet perhaps it would have been a greater shock to hear suddenly that I was dead, than to see me first thus.&rdquo;&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 404</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;I found the venerable mother of my Idris lying on a couch, her tall emaciated figure stretched out; her face fallen away, from which the nose stood out in sharp profile, and her large dark eyes, hollow and deep, gleamed with such light as may edge a thunder cloud at sun-set. All was shrivelled and dried up, except these lights; her voice too was fearfully changed, as she spoke to me at intervals. &ldquo;I am afraid,&rdquo; said she, &ldquo;that it is selfish in me to have asked you to visit the old woman again, before she dies: yet perhaps it would have been a greater shock to hear suddenly that I was dead, than to see me first thus.&rdquo;&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 404</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;She spoke with difficulty, and I perceived that she regretted the necessity of death, even more than she cared to confess. Yet she had not to complain of an undue shortening of existence; her faded person shewed that life had naturally spent itself.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 404</div></div><p>Poor Niddy was nearly unable to express anything at the last. Save for &ldquo;don&rsquo;t ever grow old.&rdquo;</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;There an hard-featured, weather-worn veteran, having prepared his meal, sat, his head dropped on his breast, the useless knife falling from his grasp, his limbs utterly relaxed, as thought of wife and child, and dearest relative, all lost, passed across his recollection. There sat a man who for forty years had basked in fortune&rsquo;s tranquil sunshine; he held the hand of his last hope, his beloved daughter, who had just attained womanhood; and he gazed on her with anxious eyes, while she tried to rally her fainting spirit to comfort him. Here a servant, faithful to the last, though dying, waited on one, who, though still erect with health, gazed with gasping fear on the variety of woe around.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 406</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Carried away by wonder, I forgot the death of man, and the living and beloved friend near me. When I turned, I saw tears streaming from his eyes; his thin hands pressed one against the other, his animated countenance beaming with admiration; &ldquo;Why,&rdquo; cried he, at last, &ldquo;Why, oh heart, whisperest thou of grief to me? Drink in the beauty of that scene, and possess delight beyond what a fabled paradise could afford.&rdquo;&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 408</div></div><p>The proper reaction when you see Switzerland for the first time.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;His blindness permitted her to continue a delusion, at first the child of accident—and now solitary beings, sole survivors in the land, he remained unacquainted with the change, nor was aware that when he listened to his child&rsquo;s music, the mute mountains, senseless lake, and unconscious trees, were, himself excepted, her sole auditors.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 411</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;They rest beneath the sod, the tree their monument;—the hallowed spot is distinct in my memory, paled in by craggy Jura, and the far, immeasurable Alps; the spire of the church they frequented still points from out the embosoming trees; and though her hand be cold, still methinks the sounds of divine music which they loved wander about, solacing their gentle ghosts.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 411</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;A train half dead, through fear of death—a hopeless, unresisting, almost reckless crew, which, in the tossed bark of life, had given up all pilotage, and resigned themselves to the destructive force of ungoverned winds. Like a few furrows of unreaped corn, which, left standing on a wide field after the rest is gathered to the garner, are swiftly borne down by the winter storm. Like a few straggling swallows, which, remaining after their fellows had, on the first unkind breath of passing autumn, migrated to genial climes, were struck to earth by the first frost of November. Like a stray sheep that wanders over the sleet-beaten hill-side, while the flock is in the pen, and dies before morning-dawn.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 412</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;[…] one by one, beneath the ice-caves, beside the waters springing from the thawed snows of a thousand winters, another and yet another of the remnant of the race of Man, closed their eyes for ever to the light.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 413</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Yellow lightnings played around the vast dome of Mont Blanc, silent as the snow-clad rock they illuminated; all was bare, wild, and sublime, while the singing of the pines in melodious murmurings added a gentle interest to the rough magnificence.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 414</div></div><p>Imagine knowing that yours would be the last sentience to behold such a thing, that nature would continue long eons of such shows irrespective of observers. That the clockwork continues without us, as easily as with us. Not that we have become irrelevant, but that we always were.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;For seven years it had had full sway upon earth; she had trod every nook of our spacious globe; she had mingled with the atmosphere, which as a cloak enwraps all our fellow-creatures—the inhabitants of native Europe—the luxurious Asiatic—the swarthy African and free American had been vanquished and destroyed by her. Her barbarous tyranny came to its close here in the rocky vale of Chamounix.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 415</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;We were impressed by the sentiment, that our race was run, but that plague would not be our destroyer. The coming time was as a mighty river, down which a charmed boat is driven, whose mortal steersman knows, that the obvious peril is not the one he needs fear, yet that danger is nigh; and who floats awe-struck under beetling precipices, through the dark and turbid waters—seeing in the distance yet stranger and ruder shapes, towards which he is irresistibly impelled.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 415</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;"Thus are we left,&ldquo; said Adrian, &ldquo;two melancholy blasted trees, where once a forest waved. We are left to mourn, and pine, and die.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 416</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;We entered smiling Italy. Mingled grass and corn grew in her plains, the unpruned vines threw their luxuriant branches around the elms. The grapes, overripe, had fallen on the ground, or hung purple, or burnished green, among the red and yellow leaves. The ears of standing corn winnowed to emptiness by the spendthrift winds; the fallen foliage of the trees, the weed-grown brooks, the dusky olive, now spotted with its blackened fruit; the chestnuts, to which the squirrel only was harvest-man; all plenty, and yet, alas! all poverty, painted in wondrous hues and fantastic groupings this land of beauty. In the towns, in the voiceless towns, we visited the churches, adorned by pictures, master-pieces of art, or galleries of statues—while in this genial clime the animals, in new found liberty, rambled through the gorgeous palaces,&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 419</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Two large halls, hung with splendid tapestry, and paved with marble, opened on each side of a court, of whose two other sides one overlooked the deep dark lake, and the other was bounded by a mountain, from whose stony side gushed, with roar and splash, the celebrated fountain. Above, underwood of myrtle and tufts of odorous plants crowned the rock, while the star-pointing giant cypresses reared themselves in the blue air, and the recesses of the hills were adorned with the luxuriant growth of chestnut-trees. Here we fixed our summer residence.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 421</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;At length the moment of his death came: the blood paused in its flow —his eyes opened, and then closed again: without convulsion or sigh, the frail tenement was left vacant of its spiritual inhabitant.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 424</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;We rowed lightly over the Laguna, and entered Canale Grande. The tide ebbed sullenly from out the broken portals and violated halls of Venice: sea weed and sea monsters were left on the blackened marble, while the salt ooze defaced the matchless works of art that adorned their walls, and the sea gull flew out from the shattered window.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 427</div></div><p>This reminds me of Ballard&rsquo;s <em>Drowned World</em>.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;She vehemently reminded us that we had promised to take her once again to Greece, to the tomb of her parents. Why go to Rome? what should we do at Rome? We might take one of the many vessels to be found here, embark in it, and steer right for Albania.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 428</div></div><p>Obviously impossible for them to travel such great distances with sufficient sustenance. But it&rsquo;s good she ignores it. That level of detail would be tedious.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;[…] the placid waves divided to receive our keel, and playfully kissed the dark sides of our little skiff, murmuring a welcome;&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 429</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Dark night mixed everything; we hardly discerned the white crests of the murderous surges, except when lightning made brief noon, and drank the darkness, shewing us our danger, and restoring us to double night.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 430</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;I was myself an excellent swimmer—the very sight of the sea was wont to raise in me such sensations, as a huntsman experiences, when he hears a pack of hounds in full cry; I loved to feel the waves wrap me and strive to overpower me; while I, lord of myself, moved this way or that, in spite of their angry buffetings.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 431</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;With every flash I saw the bordering coast; yet the progress I made was small, while each wave, as it receded, carried me back into ocean&rsquo;s far abysses.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 433</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;[…] again I raised my unanswered cry, lifting up the only voice that could ever again force the mute air to syllable the human thought.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 436</div></div><p>Baxter&rsquo;s <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=2775&amp;search_text=flood"><em>Flood</em></a> also comes to mind.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Yes, this is the earth; there is no change—no ruin—no rent made in her verdurous expanse; she continues to wheel round and round, with alternate night and day, through the sky, though man is not her adorner or inhabitant.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 447</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;[…] shall not, as here, find every thing forgetful of man; trampling on his memory, defacing his works, proclaiming from hill to hill, and vale to vale,—by the torrents freed from the boundaries which he imposed—by the vegetation liberated from the laws which he enforced—by his habitation abandoned to mildew and weeds, that his power is lost, his race annihilated for ever.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 448</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;I found myself on Monte Cavallo. The fountain sparkled in the sun; the obelisk above pierced the clear dark-blue air. The statues on each side, the works, as they are inscribed, of Phidias and Praxiteles, stood in undiminished grandeur, representing Castor and Pollux, who with majestic power tamed the rearing animal at their side. If those illustrious artists had in truth chiselled these forms, how many passing generations had their giant proportions outlived! and now they were viewed by the last of the species they were sculptured to represent and deify.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 449</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;[…] the lone wanderer will still unfurl his sail, and clasp the tiller—and, still obeying the breezes of heaven, for ever round another and another promontory, anchoring in another and another bay, still ploughing seedless ocean, leaving behind the verdant land of native Europe, adown the tawny shore of Africa, having weathered the fierce seas of the Cape, I may moor my worn skiff in a creek, shaded by spicy groves of the odorous islands of the far Indian ocean.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 450</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Thus around the shores of deserted earth, while the sun is high, and the moon waxes or wanes, angels, the spirits of the dead, and the ever-open eye of the Supreme, will behold the tiny bark, freighted with Verney—the LAST MAN.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 450</div></div>      </div>
      </div>
        <div class="footer">
    <div class="footer-data"><div class="footer-links"><ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/contact.php" title="">Contact</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/support.php" title="">Support</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/privacy.php" title="">Privacy</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/rights.php" title="">Rights</a></li></ul></div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="copyright">Copyright (c) 1999-2026 earthli.com. All Rights Reserved.</div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="versions">Powered by <ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore/app_news.php">earthli News 3.7</a></li><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore" title="">earthli WebCore&trade; 3.7</a></li></ul></div></div>    </div>
      </div>
  </div>  </body>
</html>
]]>
  </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
      <title type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[Scifi and Fantasy Recommendations (for a younger reader)]]>
  </title>
    <id>https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=4123</id>
    <link href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=4123"/>
    <updated>2020-12-27T13:16:57+01:00</updated>
    <author>
        <name type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[Marco von Ballmoos]]>
  </name>
      <uri>https://earthli.com/users/marco</uri>
    </author>
      <summary type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<p>I recently learned that a young reader I know is a fan of <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_City_of_Ember">The City of Ember</a> (<cite><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/">Wikipedia</a></cite>), which is a science-fiction novel <span class="quote-inline">&ldquo;[…] about Ember, a post-apocalyptic underground city threatened by aging infrastructure and corruption.&rdquo;</span> I heard she&rsquo;d received the <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_People_of_Sparks">The People of Sparks</a> (<cite><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/">Wikipedia</a></cite>) as a gift and was intrigued to... [<a class="complete-text-link" href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=4123">More</a>]</p>
]]>
  </summary>
      <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<html lang="en">
  <head>
    <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/themes/ice.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/fonts/raleway.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/core/medium.css">
  </head>
  <body>
<div class="style-controls">  <div class="page">
    <div class="page-body">
<div class="info-box-top">
<p>
Published by <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_user.php?name=marco" title="Marco von Ballmoos" class="visible">marco</a> on <span class="date-time">27. Dec 2020 13:16:57 (GMT-5)</span>
</p>
</div>
      <div class="text-flow wide">
  <p>I recently learned that a young reader I know is a fan of <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_City_of_Ember">The City of Ember</a> (<cite><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/">Wikipedia</a></cite>), which is a science-fiction novel <span class="quote-inline">&ldquo;[…] about Ember, a post-apocalyptic underground city threatened by aging infrastructure and corruption.&rdquo;</span> I heard she&rsquo;d received the <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_People_of_Sparks">The People of Sparks</a> (<cite><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/">Wikipedia</a></cite>) as a gift and was intrigued to learn that she was reading books deemed &ldquo;science fiction&rdquo;.</p>
<p>I dug back through my own lists of recent years to find the following recommendations for (more or less) age- and reading-level appropriate series that provide useful fodder for a voracious reader.</p>
<ul>
<li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3127">Books read in 2015</a> (Silo)</li>
<li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3209">Books read in 2016</a> (Silo)</li>
<li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3357">Books read in 2017</a> (Kingkiller Chronicle, Broken Earth)</li>
<li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3497">Books read in 2018</a> (Broken Earth, Hexalogy)</li></ul><p>I attached the following note:</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;None of my recommendations—either this one or future ones—are to be seen as a full-throated endorsement of any politics or opinions contained in them. None of them are YA and none of them will have been vetted for young audiences, but since you&rsquo;re 16, I don&rsquo;t see that as highly relevant. <abbr><a href="https://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=ymmv" title="Your Mileage May Vary">YMMY</a></abbr>.</p>
<p>&ldquo;I don&rsquo;t expect you to read any of them, nor will there be a quiz. I&rsquo;m just delighted to find that people are still reading books. It gives me hope. If you do try something I recommend, I&rsquo;d of course be interested to hear what you (will have?) thought of them (everyone brings their own perspective to anything they read).&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote><h2><a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Silo_(series)">Silo</a></h2><p>The description of City of Ember on Wikipedia reminded me of a series I read a few years back. This set of books, too, are about a society finding its way underground—and some people&rsquo;s efforts to perhaps get out.</p>
<p>From Wikipedia:</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The story of Wool takes place on a post-apocalyptic Earth.[6] Humanity clings to survival in the Silo, a subterranean city extending one hundred forty-four stories beneath the surface.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>My reviews and notes:</p>
<ul>
<li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3199"><em>Wool</em> by <em>Hugh Howey</em> (2011; read in 2015)</a></li>
<li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3218"><em>Shift</em> by <em>Hugh Howey</em> (2011; read in 2016)</a></li>
<li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3219"><em>Dust</em> by <em>Hugh Howey</em> (2012; read in 2016)</a></li></ul><h2><a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Kingkiller_Chronicle">The Kingkiller Chronicle</a></h2><p>From the Wikipedia entry for the <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Name_of_the_Wind">first book</a>:</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;The Kingkiller Chronicle takes place in the fictional world of Temerant, a large continent of which the known part, called the Four Corners of Civilization, is divided into several distinct nations and cultures. Much of the world follows a religion similar, though not identical, to medieval Christianity. </p>
<p>&ldquo;Coexisting alongside the mortal world is the realm of The Fae, a parallel universe inhabited by supernatural creatures which can move between the two realms only when the moon is full. Magic exists in Temerant, too, but obeys a well-defined set of rules and principles that can only be exploited by those who have trained in its professional and scientific use.&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote><p>My reviews and notes:</p>
<ul>
<li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3462"><em>The Name of the Wind</em> by <em>Patrick Rothfuss</em> (2007; read in 2017)</a></li>
<li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3492"><em>The Wise Man’s Fear</em> by <em>Patrick Rothfuss</em> (2011; read in 2017)</a></li></ul><h2><a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sergei_Lukyanenko">The Hexalogy</a></h2><p>From the Wikipedia entry for the <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Night_Watch_(Lukyanenko_novel)">first book</a>:</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;In the story&rsquo;s worldline there exists a magical realm beneath the surface of all things—referred to as the Twilight (or Gloom in other translations). The action in the novel centers on a group of people referred to as the Others —human beings who tapped into the Twilight and gained supernormal abilities.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>The books were published in the original Russian and translated to English later.</p>
<p>My reviews and notes:</p>
<ul>
<li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3567"><em>The Night Watch</em> by <em>Sergei Lukyanenko</em> (1998 – en/2006) (read in 2018)</a></li>
<li>The Day Watch</li>
<li>The Twilight Watch</li>
<li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3568"><em>The Last Watch</em> by <em>Sergei Lukyanenko</em> (2006 – en/2008) (read in 2018)</a></li>
<li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3569"><em>The New Watch</em> by <em>Sergei Lukyanenko</em> (2011 – en/2012) (read in 2018)</a></li>
<li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3582"><em>The Sixth Watch</em> by <em>Sergei Lukyanenko</em> (2012 – en/2013) (read in 2018)</a></li></ul><h2><a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/N._K._Jemisin">The Broken Earth</a></h2><p>From the Wikipedia entry for the <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Fifth_Season_(novel)">first book</a>:</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;The Fifth Season takes place on a planet with a single supercontinent called the Stillness. Every few centuries, its inhabitants endure what they call a &ldquo;Fifth Season&rdquo; of catastrophic climate change.</p>
<p>&ldquo;[…] In a prologue, an extraordinarily powerful orogene discusses the sad state of the world and laments the oppression of his race. He then uses his enormous power to fracture the entire continent along its length, threatening to cause the worst Fifth Season in recorded history. The story then follows three female orogenes across the Stillness from different time periods: Essun, Damaya, and Syenite.&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote><p>My reviews and notes:</p>
<ul>
<li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3455"><em>The Fifth Season (The Broken Earth Book 1)</em> by <em>N.K. Jemisin</em> (2015) (read in 2017)</a></li>
<li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3474"><em>The Obelisk Gate (The Broken Earth Book 2)</em> by <em>N.K. Jemisin</em> (2016) (read in 2017)</a></li>
<li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3507"><em>The Stone Sky (The Broken Earth Book 3)</em> by <em>N.K. Jemisin</em> (2017) (read in 2018)</a></li></ul>      </div>
      </div>
        <div class="footer">
    <div class="footer-data"><div class="footer-links"><ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/contact.php" title="">Contact</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/support.php" title="">Support</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/privacy.php" title="">Privacy</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/rights.php" title="">Rights</a></li></ul></div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="copyright">Copyright (c) 1999-2026 earthli.com. All Rights Reserved.</div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="versions">Powered by <ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore/app_news.php">earthli News 3.7</a></li><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore" title="">earthli WebCore&trade; 3.7</a></li></ul></div></div>    </div>
      </div>
  </div>  </body>
</html>
]]>
  </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
      <title type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[Living in the Long Emergency by James Howard Kunstler (2020; read in 2020)]]>
  </title>
    <id>https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=4028</id>
    <link href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=4028"/>
    <updated>2020-10-18T12:57:21+02:00</updated>
    <author>
        <name type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[Marco von Ballmoos]]>
  </name>
      <uri>https://earthli.com/users/marco</uri>
    </author>
      <summary type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<blockquote class="quote abstract "><div>Disclaimer: these are notes I took while reading this book. They include citations I found interesting or enlightening or particularly well-written. In some cases, I&rsquo;ve pointed out which of these applies to which citation; in others, I have not. Any benefit you gain from reading these notes is... [<a class="complete-text-link" href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=4028">More</a>]</div></blockquote>]]>
  </summary>
      <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<html lang="en">
  <head>
    <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/themes/ice.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/fonts/raleway.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/core/medium.css">
  </head>
  <body>
<div class="style-controls">  <div class="page">
    <div class="page-body">
<div class="info-box-top">
<p>
Published by <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_user.php?name=marco" title="Marco von Ballmoos" class="visible">marco</a> on <span class="date-time">18. Oct 2020 12:57:21 (GMT-5)</span>
</p>
<p>
Updated by <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_user.php?name=marco" title="Marco von Ballmoos" class="visible">marco</a> on <span class="date-time">18. Oct 2020 12:57:44 (GMT-5)</span>
</p>
</div>
      <div class="text-flow wide">
  <blockquote class="quote abstract "><div>Disclaimer: these are notes I took while reading this book. They include citations I found interesting or enlightening or particularly well-written. In some cases, I&rsquo;ve pointed out which of these applies to which citation; in others, I have not. Any benefit you gain from reading these notes is purely incidental to the purpose they serve of reminding me what I once read. Please see Wikipedia for a summary if I&rsquo;ve failed to provide one sufficient for your purposes. If my notes serve to trigger an interest in this book, then I&rsquo;m happy for you.</div></blockquote><p>This book is a follow-up to Kunstler&rsquo;s 2005 <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3938">The Long Emergency</a>. It starts out with a recap of the thesis from the other book and then fills in with information from the last 15 years. Kunstler takes a critical look at his predictions from 2005, detailing where he got it right and where he went wrong—and why.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;I didn’t call it The Long Emergency for no reason. The operations of complex societies have many interesting features. Two in particular exist in a sort of dynamic tension of opposites: fragility and inertia. Fragility accretes insidiously as ever-greater complexity is layered onto the system. But inertia is the property by which systems in motion tend to remain in motion. A system as large and complex as ours has acquired tremendous momentum, which, of course, feeds back to aggravate its fragility, portending a more destructive eventual outcome.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 1</div></div><p>For example, the shale-oil boom was unforeseeable and kicked the can down the road for a decade—at most. He likens it to <span class="quote-inline">&ldquo;cutting of the top ten inches of your bedsheet and sewing it on the bottom because your feet were cold.&rdquo;</span> Fracking is capital-intensive—read: expensive—and requires heavy loans. Fracked, shale-oil wells have a much steeper expiry curve and are quickly played out.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;As independent oil analyst Arthur Berman put it: “Shale is a retirement party for the oil industry.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 9</div></div><p>Companies that are trying to stay ahead of their creditors have no choice but to dig more and more wells to take advantage of the initial steep &ldquo;play&rdquo;, taking on more and more debt. Kunstler calls it &ldquo;Red Queen Syndrome&rdquo; because they&rsquo;re <span class="quote-inline">&ldquo;running as fast as they can to stay in one place.&rdquo;</span> It&rsquo;s only ZIRP (Zero Interest-rate Policies) that even allow something like this to exist.</p>
<p>The more successful they are—and they have been very successful, driving U.S. oil production to heretofore unknown heights—the lower the oil price as the market gluts. When the price drops, their already-shitty and barely non-laughable business model becomes utterly fantastic and untenable. But they can&rsquo;t stop producing, either.</p>
<p>He also discusses the increasing rise of propaganda for both alternative energy and for electric vehicles. He quickly disposes of the notion that either of these will replace the existing infrastructure in any significant way—not without drastically changing living patterns and levels of consumption.</p>
<p>The solution to the atrocity of suburbia, its attendant necessitating of an automobile for nearly everything, and the large-scale elimination of public transportation is not to replace the entire fleet with electric vehicles or to electrify all of the existing vehicles. There are neither nearly enough time nor resources for any of that. There&rsquo;s also the poor fit—or utter engineering impossibility—of using electric for everything that we use fossil fuels for today. You can&rsquo;t fly on batteries, nor can you ship overland with batter-powered trucks. Trains would work, but the U.S. blew its rail network to kingdom come decades ago.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The likelihood that we will power the USA on “renewable” energy in anything remotely like the current configuration of activities—suburbia, Happy Motoring, air-conditioning for all, cheap food, night baseball, Netflix, Amazon, server farms, commercial aviation, et cetera—is about the same as the chance that Xi Jinping will deliver each and every one of us a dim sum birthday breakfast at home next year.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 28</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The wishful public has been fed a diet of misinformation from a wishful news media that won’t tolerate anything but positive thinking about maintaining our current arrangements because imagining a different outcome is too depressing.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 29</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The thinking displayed in the Drawdown Project’s manifesto ignores a primary reality of our predicament: that increased complexity leads to increased risk of systemic breakdown. It’s as if they can’t imagine a world without a continuing expansion of human activities, as represented in economic growth. That is their only context. All that needs to be done is to “green up” the growth.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 212</div></div><p>In part two, Kunstler takes to the road to visit with and interview some of his most interesting, frequent, or long-term correspondents. He mostly visits farmers and those who have figured out how to be self-sufficient, self-taught, or at least useful in myriad ways. They almost all have the affectation common to the self-taught and somewhat cloistered: they have theories that they&rsquo;ve never had refuted. Mostly, though, they seem like relatively nice (if, at times, woefully undereducated and drastically over-autodidactic) people—Ok, the white-supremacist was far less rational and more suffused with conspiracy lore than the others—who are making their way in decidedly non-mainstream and more traditional and possibly moral ways.</p>
<p>The third and final part looks at some topics that have come much more to the fore in the last fifteen years—and even in the year it took to write the first two parts: extinctions in Nature and environmental impact, financialization and oil and its massive and disastrous impact on savings and investment in the ten years since the 2008 crisis, the autocoprophagy of the American Left (the Right was already hopeless) in recent politics, with the seeming madness engendered by the election of Trump and, more importantly, the loss by Clinton.</p>
<p>This madness evinces itself as a descent into omphaloskepsis on the part of the Left, as they shatter themselves into sects of Twitter-history–scouring hordes of virtue-signalers and purity-testers and know-it-alls who show up to torpedo anyone who was ever useful for ever having been slightly less than perfect in careers that have often spanned decades of struggle and hardship.</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Social media, it turns out, amplifies and accelerates antisocial behavior among a population that was already having a hard enough time processing reality.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>Some of his further speculation is highly speculative and, in my opinion, wrong-headed, but that&rsquo;s to be expected, I suppose. Whereas he&rsquo;s mostly right about Trump, </p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;History is a prankster. You order a Gray Champion, and cosmic room service sends up a casino developer and New York real estate mogul with a laughable hairdo, a big mouth, and no experience running a government.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 232</div></div><p>…his in-built libertarianism mounts for him the same blinkers that many Americans wear, preventing them from seeing any solution but the one put right in front of them. For example, he complains about </p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;[…] and a new confiscatory wealth tax on assets, not the income from assets, but a tax on what you already own.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 238</div></div><p>But many economically successful countries have something like it (including Switzerland). The problem of inequality is probably the biggest one facing the US (and other countries), with its nearly unfettered upward redistribution of wealth. Making that wealth inheritable cements the problem. Address the idea of &ldquo;seizing capital&rdquo;, he writes,</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Even theoretically, the money to pay for those programs doesn’t exist.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 239</div></div><p>It does. Other people have it. Even if future debt doesn&rsquo;t work, we can take back value from those who have stolen it from us and hoarded it. There&rsquo;s a decent chance that, by the time we get done taking it, that it won&rsquo;t be worth anything anymore, but the money is technically <em>available</em>.</p>
<p>While he rightly recognizes that racism isn&rsquo;t the biggest problem—and that historical attempts to address it in the U.S. have failed miserably—he obstinately characterizes these failings in ways that blame the wrong parties. He correctly notes that all races in a certain class are affected by the upward distribution—pointing out that telling people who&rsquo;ve also been left behind that they need to share the tiny piece of pie they have is a non-starter. This is all correct, but somewhat lost in his ham-handed prose (and I&rsquo;m being very generous here because he&rsquo;s otherwise a lucid thinker and writer; some would just dismiss him as a racist outright, which is unfair in the other direction).</p>
<p>Finally, he tells of his own personal journey over the last fifteen years. He divorced, moved out of Saratoga Springs, and bought a property with a house on it in a declining nearby town. He&rsquo;s got a large garden, fruit trees, and some chickens. With about ten hours of work per week, he makes a good part of his own food. He&rsquo;s close enough to town to walk to Main Street. He was quite ill for nearly a decade with cobalt poisoning from a hip replacement in 2003. He seems to have battened down the hatches in his preparations for the ongoing Long Emergency (exacerbated post-publication by COVID-19).</p>
<h2>Citations</h2><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;I didn’t call it The Long Emergency for no reason. The operations of complex societies have many interesting features. Two in particular exist in a sort of dynamic tension of opposites: fragility and inertia. Fragility accretes insidiously as ever-greater complexity is layered onto the system. But inertia is the property by which systems in motion tend to remain in motion. A system as large and complex as ours has acquired tremendous momentum, which, of course, feeds back to aggravate its fragility, portending a more destructive eventual outcome.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 1</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;In any case, after 2016, the attention of the media especially turned away from everything but the political battle of the so-called “resistance” versus Trump. There’s very little news about climate change, the oil predicament, the condition of the banking system, the global food supply, the mass extinction of life on land and sea, and all the other issues that will likely end up mattering a whole lot more than the fate of Donald J. Trump.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 4</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The objective is to stimulate the formation of a coherent consensus about what is happening to us so we can make coherent plans about what to do.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 4</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;As independent oil analyst Arthur Berman put it: “Shale is a retirement party for the oil industry.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 9</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Between 2005 and 2008, US imports reached almost fifteen million barrels a day—three-quarters of all the oil we burned. Our dependence on oil produced by foreign nations had become a matter of grave concern.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 10</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;On top of all that were the environmental “externalities”—the threat of poisoned groundwater from chemicals in the fracking fluid, seismic disturbances (i.e., earthquakes) from poking so many pipes through underground strata and blasting it with high-pressure water, the considerable wear and tear on roads from the cavalcades of water and sand trucks, and the higher-order damage to the biosphere from extending the fossil-fuel economic regime.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 14</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;the oil companies are under tremendous pressure to produce as much oil as quickly as possible in order to maintain the cash flow necessary to service their debt. Paradoxically, that has led to excessive production and thus lower oil prices—a hamster wheel of futility.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 14</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The US burned around five billion barrels of oil in 2017 plus an additional two billion barrels of natural gas liquids, averaging around 19.5 million barrels a day. Independent analyst Arthur Berman estimated that the Permian Basin contained a remaining 3.7 billion barrels of realistically economical-recoverable oil. Do the math.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 15</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The US is caught in a predicament that can be stated pretty simply: oil over $75 a barrel crushes economic activity, and oil under $75 a barrel bankrupts oil companies.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 16</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The public apparently has lost any sense of urgency about our fossil-fuel quandary, and therefore lost any motivation to even think about making changes in our basic living arrangements.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 19</div></div><p>As with COVID.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Unless, that is, we’re tired of the possibilities for joy, meaning, and excitement on a planet (this one: Earth) that we are superbly fitted to thrive on—and which, sadly, we’re in the process of damaging quite recklessly with our current activities, including shooting a lot of junk into orbit around it.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 21</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;But the Mars colonization proposal does raise a sticky question: If the human race can’t get its shit together on Earth, how might we possibly thrive on a distant planet with an atmosphere that is 95 percent carbon dioxide, has little protection against space radiation, no visible aboveground water, nor any of the geophysical and biological characteristics that support life here, and which, finally, is a 33.9-million-mile resupply journey at its closest?&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 22</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The fantasy that power for the proposed electric car fleet will someday come from “renewables” also probably founders on the unacknowledged need for an underlying cheap fossil-fuel economy to fabricate things like solar panels and wind turbines at the necessary scale to come close to the lifestyle we think of as normal.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 23</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Even if the trips were all multi-passenger rides, the commute would still require an awful lot of cars.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 25</div></div><p>Corona throws a monkey wrench in here as well.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;After 2010, car sales crept back up again to over seventeen million a year. These are the kind of sales numbers the car manufacturers need to justify their business model. How does this gigantic industry reorganize for much-lower-scale production and survive? Does it become a boutique industry?&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 26</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The good news would be that electric cars have the potential to last much longer than gasoline or diesel cars. That’s good news for the car buyer, at least. The bad news is that, unless cars are engineered for timely failure (planned obsolescence), the car manufacturers cannot depend on the same routine replacement formula that has ruled their economic model for decades and accounts for most car sales.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 26</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The likelihood that we will power the USA on “renewable” energy in anything remotely like the current configuration of activities—suburbia, Happy Motoring, air-conditioning for all, cheap food, night baseball, Netflix, Amazon, server farms, commercial aviation, et cetera—is about the same as the chance that Xi Jinping will deliver each and every one of us a dim sum birthday breakfast at home next year.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 28</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The public is tragically confused about so-called “renewable energy.” The sun may shine a lot of the time (in some places anyway), and the winds may blow (ditto), and they may indeed be eternal features of Earth’s geophysics, but the hardware necessary to capture that energy is not renewable. It’s a product of a fossil-fuel economy, and we have no experience fabricating this hardware any other way—most particularly via renewable energy sources. And certainly not at the scale required for a vaunted “Green New Deal.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 28</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The wishful public has been fed a diet of misinformation from a wishful news media that won’t tolerate anything but positive thinking about maintaining our current arrangements because imagining a different outcome is too depressing.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 29</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;This is not a malicious conspiracy by evil authorities so much as a neurotic defense mechanism in the face of the disturbing reality that the comforts and conveniences of recent decades may be drawing to a close.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 29</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Wind turbines typically contain more than eight thousand parts. These are made of steel, concrete, exotic metals, and exotic plastics, components that depend on heavy mining activity, the petrochemical industry, long supply lines, and a lot of energy to bring it all together to manufacture and then deploy the gigantic machines.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 30</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;all the logistical issues that apply to wind turbines apply to solar: embedded energy in manufacturing the hardware, long mining and manufacturing supply lines, transportation of components to site, limited design life, exposure to the extremes of weather, technical expertise needed to deploy the hardware and the costs associated with all of that. So far, existing battery storage would not scale to accommodate the amount of solar electricity needed under any hypothetical “green energy transition” schemes.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 31</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The bottom line is we will be able to set up a lot less wind and solar electric infrastructure than the public is being teased with these days.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 32</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Finally, there is the issue of the electric grid, a genuine wonder of the world. Americans rarely think twice when they enter their home and flick on the light switch. We just take it for granted that the juice is always available. That is not the case in many other societies around the world. Intermittent or unreliable electric service would be a catastrophe for American business and a trauma for households. And it may be increasingly the outcome as we move forward.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 34</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Social media, it turns out, amplifies and accelerates antisocial behavior among a population that was already having a hard enough time processing reality.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 42</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;One important additional angle, however, is uniformly left out of the debate: how all this computer technology is really at the mercy of the fragile electric grid. All discussion about where digital technology is heading in the future ignores this sticky issue, and how it is tied to our fossil fuel supply and debt-based finance system.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 43</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;He considers the chestnut an excellent food crop and claims that many of the products made from corn these days could be made from chestnut flour. Corn is a majestically resilient and versatile food crop, but it is hell on a biome. And the way that the agri-biz boys grow it is washing away the topsoil of the American breadbasket at epic rates. It can’t go on. And, as we already know, things that can’t go on, don’t.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 52</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Nowadays it’s gotten to the point where one lone agri-biz farmer can spend a day mindlessly sitting in the air-conditioned cab of a giant, million-dollar harvester guided by GPS, watching movies on an iPad while the machine does all the work, including the mental labor of deciding when to turn the rig down a new row. It’s barely necessary for a human to be mentally present while the job gets done. The giant harvesters also come with giant mortgages. The biggest “input” in this mode of farming is borrowed money, a.k.a. debt.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 59</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;If we don’t go toward a perennial ecosystems-based agriculture, whether we’re high-tech or low-tech, we’re going to collapse, because there’s no way to avoid that.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 70</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;“I can handle deer flies,” Mark said. “You know how you deal with a deer fly? You grab an oak twig and just stick it behind your ear and they won’t bite you.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 71</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;There are a few regulars with extreme views whom I allow to post because they are, at least, polite in presenting their unappetizing ideas, and squelching them would keep a certain political reality that we must contend with out of the arena where, at least, they are exposed to light and argument. A couple of these are white nationalists.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 73</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The Civil Rights era ensued, and the legal basis of Jim Crow was dismantled, immediately followed by Lyndon Johnson’s “War on Poverty,” with its unanticipated and destructive knock-on effects of welfare dependency and single parenthood.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 76</div></div><p>He will not fucking let up on this. As if this wasn&rsquo;t planned as a side-effect of the massive expansion of the carceral state as Jim Crow was replaced with a new slew of laws applied extremely disproportionately to Blacks.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Indeed, Josh had commented earlier that he viewed black life in America as essentially “prison culture.” I asked if he’d ever been in jail. He said that he’d never even been inside a police car. But he viewed racism in America as being absolutely structural and pervasive, and he based his comportment on the need to survive in a fundamentally hostile culture.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 84</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;It had the look of an extraordinarily well-equipped prison cell. Indeed, Josh had commented earlier that he viewed black life in America as essentially “prison culture.” I asked if he’d ever been in jail. He said that he’d never even been inside a police car. But he viewed racism in America as being absolutely structural and pervasive, and he based his comportment on the need to survive in a fundamentally hostile culture. “I dump on black people being fuckups, but racism is a real phenomenon. And you have to come up with strategies to counter it because you can’t just ignore it.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 84</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;He regards relations between blacks and whites as “a total disaster” because “[t]he people who have the ability to eliminate racism do not have the will to do so, and the people who have the will to do so do not have the ability.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 85</div></div><p>Hard to disagree in general.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;People will be further “freed” to become prisoners of their own passions, no matter how ridiculous. Video games, porn, recreational marijuana, “sex robots,” social media of all kinds . . . “Distraction” will become the formal currency that drives the economy because in a nation where people (especially young men) can no longer count on full-time employment, the state will have every incentive to support and defend every hedonistic, narcissistic, distractive behavior in order to keep attention off themselves and their failed policies.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 93</div></div><p>Josh wrote the citation above.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;But I came to the conclusion that the problem with the current set of tools was not solvable. We used wind and solar in one form or another to power our planet for × thousands of years, but we’ve never powered it at this scale.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 102</div></div><p>The man never finished high school.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;My big epiphany: the moment you run out of modern metallurgical tools, a lot of things that we take for granted today you can’t do anymore.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 103</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;These days, his favorite math workout is how the transcendental number “e” comes into existence. “It’s like pi,” he attempts to explain. Of course, he was talking to somebody who flunked both basic geometry and algebra 1 in high school.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 115</div></div><p>The blind leading the blind.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Moscow, in the mid 1990s, was an exciting place for a young man. The Russian people had only been out of the Soviet yoke for a few years. Liberation and danger were both in the air. The Americans, led by Harvard economist Jeffrey Sachs, were attempting to “help” the Russians reorient their economy along capitalist market lines—and incidentally assisting the fledgling oligarchs in looting what remained of the country’s industrial base to amass their fortunes.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 120</div></div><p>So-so description. At least he used quotes around &ldquo;help&rdquo;.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The people born between 1980 and 1984 are the really youngest around who grew up in an analog world, in a world that made more sense than today’s world does to people. I am part of the most useless generation that’s ever existed in human history. Millennials know how to do less for themselves than anyone that’s ever existed on the planet Earth. Home Depot and Lowe’s, a couple of years ago they realized ‘our business model is screwed’ because this whole generation of people that’s coming up, they don’t even know how to use a tape measure.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 150</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;“I think people need to live far more humbly,” she said. “That should have happened a long time ago, probably at least twenty years ago. Like, we have neighbors that work for efficiency advocacy groups, yet they fly all over the world for vacations. There’s just this disconnect. Or I guess you call it greenwashing in your own mind. A lot of people genuinely don’t even think about it and don’t even know, so they’re not even doing it hypocritically. They just honestly don’t even know how much energy something like flying takes. I think the population has to decrease. I think more people need to have small gardens—and I don’t know if this is possible.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 169</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The city of Perth, at the farthest southwestern edge of Australia, is reputed to be the major world city farthest away from any other civilized place on Earth.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 180</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;“I understand,” he said, “if you’re doing well in a system which is collapsing, it’s in the interest of your own psychological comfort to imagine that the collapse is a fairy tale, that it’s really just lazy people who should get to work and stop complaining. I think our civilization climbed a lot faster than any previous one and it can go down a lot faster. I’ve been living through the collapse most of my life. And I think my kids will live through it for most of their lives.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 189</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;the general theme out there is a belief that the problems with our current arrangements can be “fixed” if we just elect the right leaders, apply the right “policy tools,” guarantee equal outcomes, have faith in technological innovation, recycle more trash, and “celebrate diversity.” They are hoping for the best, while living lives that make them frantic just getting through each day, and losing ground even so.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 192</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The world population increased from one billion souls around the year 1800 to nearly eight billion today. (In my lifetime, the USA population more than doubled from 160 million to 330 million.)&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 193</div></div><p>In my lifetime, world population has doubled.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;will take some initiative, grit, skill, and probably some luck to stay in the game, which is why it pays to be an early adapter.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 193</div></div><p>It <em>always</em> takes luck. You have to <em>make something</em> of opportunity, but without luck or—even worse—with bad luck, you&rsquo;re still sunk.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;But today, the world is composed of overdeveloped nations and nations that will probably never develop much further, though we continue to use the euphemism “developing nations” in the public discussion to avoid insulting struggling societies. The fossil fuels won’t be there for them any more than they’ll be there for us. The capital for work-arounds will not be there either. Many so-called developing nations exist in geographically unfavorable places and are already deep into population overshoot. Think: Egypt. Now imagine Egypt with no more grain subsidies and only donkeys where they used to have trucks.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 194</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;In short, people living at the core—the “developed” or “advanced” nations—could fall faster and harder than the people in the undeveloped places where life, however arduous, is already simple. So, it may be more accurate to view this as a leveling process. We’ll know more in a few years.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 194</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The weak link in our economy is the feature we call finance, which has been failing in one way or another since the dot-com bust. It slipped very badly again in 2008 and was temporarily salvaged by nations borrowing massively from the future to cover current expenses and to bail out insolvent “systemically important institutions,” i.e., Too-Big-to-Fail banks. The problem, which ought to be obvious by now, is that the future will not provide the amount of collateral that was pledged as security for all that debt—namely, “growth” of ever-more industrial activity and the surplus wealth it would hypothetically produce.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 201</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The confusion at even the most refined layers of the intellectual class is so great now, so vitiated by wishful thinking, public relations bullshit, and political opportunism, that the responsibility weighs extra heavily on individuals to think for themselves through the fog of yammer.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 202</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;If government can be reorganized (or emergently self-reorganizes) at the local level, it may tend to be authoritarian. This has been pretty much the norm through human history. Human societies are inevitably hierarchical. Tribes have chiefs. Elites often push the rest of us around. Under the best circumstances, they do it within some cultural constraints to avert rebellion.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 203</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;So, thinking about future food production, you must figure on a problem at least as significant as an unstable climate: the end of affordable oil and gas and all their by-products, especially pesticides, herbicides, fertilizers, and motor fuels.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 205</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Apart from weather, a stem-rust disease in the Middle East and North Africa dropped yields, with Yemen hit especially hard (and in failed state chaos a decade later).&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 206</div></div><p>Can you please mention how their sufferings are not even mostly incidental to climate, but a deliberate machination by Saudi and America?</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The top four corn exporters account for 87 percent of total corn exports. Around the world, corn is the leading livestock feed. The report predicts more frequent “synchronous price shocks.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 208</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Likewise, the Drawdown Project’s riff on airplanes of the future: A century after the first commercial flight, the aviation industry has become a fixture of global transport . . . and of global emissions. Today, some 20,000 airplanes are in service around the world, producing at minimum 2.5 percent of annual emissions. With upwards of 50,000 planes expected to take to the skies by 2040 . . .50 Say what? I’m much more inclined to think that there will be little left of commercial aviation in 2040, not that it will be two and a half times bigger than it is now. Their argument assumes that aviation fuel—basically unleaded kerosene—will continue to be available in the same (or greater!) volumes than today.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 210</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;I’m sure it is a cool and fun exercise to imagine evermore elegant technologies, but that ignores the central problem of making further overinvestments in technological complexity as the already-existing hyper-complexity groans with diminishing returns.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 210</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;“[E]ssential supply chains depend on trucks nearly completely,” she writes. They even deliver the diesel fuel that the trucks run on, as well as other essentials, such as the chemicals used for most municipal water-treatment plants and the food that most Americans eat.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 211</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The thinking displayed in the Drawdown Project’s manifesto ignores a primary reality of our predicament: that increased complexity leads to increased risk of systemic breakdown. It’s as if they can’t imagine a world without a continuing expansion of human activities, as represented in economic growth. That is their only context. All that needs to be done is to “green up” the growth.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 212</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The fact is, 97 percent of the bluefin tuna that were in the oceans before industrial-scaled, mechanized fishing began are gone now.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 213</div></div><p>Actually 100% of those fish are gone. But they&rsquo;ve been replaced with only 3%.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Changing the ocean’s basic chemistry is a dangerous game. It’s been thirty-five million years since Earth last reached the atmospheric CO2 levels that are being recorded today. There are several earlier instances, too, recorded in undersea sediment cores. But the rate of change has never been as fast as the current situation. Even in periods when the CO2 levels were higher, the rate of change was slower, and the oceans had time to buffer the effects. That’s not the case now. It’s hard to conceive an outcome in which we can have dead oceans and a still-living Earth.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 218</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;I’ve already described my objections to techno-narcissism and organizational grandiosity. We think too highly of our magical abilities to control the things we are so busy measuring.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 218</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;What will finally change the picture is the economic collapse of techno-industrial society.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 218</div></div><p>The Corona hammer was a dress rehearsal.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Global economies, it was thought, would always return to the growth trend line, and that growth could be considered the collateral for ever-more borrowing. Growth meant more, more of everything, ever-more more.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 221</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;[…] more to the point, that the public would soon catch on. That is, if expected future growth was collateral for all these massive borrowings—about $240 trillion globally as I write—and there was no more growth, then the debt would never be repaid, and the nations in question would probably not be able to borrow anymore, meaning further, no more bid on bond sales, unless the central banks bought all the bonds themselves. And, if they did, it would be an arrant fraud, and the attempt to do so would have nasty consequences, most likely a currency crisis in which the nation’s money itself lost its value, as people lost faith in the operations that supported it.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 221</div></div><p>And yet, here we are. Covid got that ball rolling quite a bit faster.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The main result was that jacked-up share prices tended to reward top executives with large year-end bonuses, and more valuable stock holdings, regardless of the performance of the company. The bonuses were usually granted by boards of directors who were appointed by the same people getting the bonuses. These machinations were just another form of classic and massive malinvestment&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 222</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;You can also view it as mismanagement of all the work that people in society do to produce things of value. Many savers are traditionally older people who seek a low-risk but regular return on their savings. Removing the incentive for saving either pushes them into higher-risk investments like stocks, or prompts them to just spend down the money before it loses even more value. Pension funds, too, are traditionally inclined to seek annual income from low-risk interest-bearing securities, and they need to show reliable gains year-in and year-out in order to pay their obligations to retirees and stay solvent.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 223</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;There will be a lack of bond buyers (lenders) in whatever is left of the regular bond market because it will be obvious by then that the government is a deadbeat—that the only way it can pay back the bondholders is in money that has less value than it did when it was borrowed, because the government is repaying old debt in new borrowings that it has, in effect lent to itself. So, it completes the circle jerk of borrowing from its own central bank in order to pay back the central bank.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 224</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Nothing lasts forever, of course, and wonderful as it was, the industrial economy couldn’t last forever. It produced too many destructive externalities, including global population overshoot, resource depletion, and planetary ecological impoverishment. So, as it became apparent that the game couldn’t go on, a lot of the smarter folk in society turned to racketeering to keep making money at all costs—even doctors and college presidents!&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 224</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The really magical part was that they managed to make it socially normative and ethically acceptable, even while the middle class was systematically impoverished by their rackets—so that in the year 2019, any poor schnook who took his child to an emergency room with appendicitis could find a bill for $97,000 in his mailbox two months later, with no plausible explanation for the charges—and absolutely nobody from the hospital billing director to the state attorney general would do anything to correct the injustice, or even listen to his complaint.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 225</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Because the depletion rate of shale oil wells is so steep, the industry can’t function without high rates of continual capital spending, and they can’t spend without borrowing. The wells have to be drilled incessantly and fracked (with countless truck trips hauling fracking sand, water, and chemicals to the wells). The industry is caught in the Red Queen Syndrome: running as fast as it can to keep production up.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 226</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;[…] national digital currencies created by computer “magic.” Certainly, some countries (e.g., Sweden) are working hard to eliminate cash. People in other nations may not be so ready to submit. An unappetizing by-product of this scheme will be government’s ability to track everybody’s income and spending, in essence, a financial “surveillance state” with an expanded range of punishments for noncompliance.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 229</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Don’t forget that the internet is at the mercy of the electric grid, the world’s largest machine, as it is sometimes called. The American electric grid is in notoriously shabby condition. Draw your own conclusions.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 229</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;History is a prankster. You order a Gray Champion, and cosmic room service sends up a casino developer and New York real estate mogul with a laughable hairdo, a big mouth, and no experience running a government.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 232</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Philosophically, they are aligned with Rousseau’s idea of the perfectibility of man and a neo-Jacobin wish to engineer equality of outcome in a world of uncertain events where people are born with different abilities.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 238</div></div><p>Mischaracterized. Different ability, maybe. Different starting lines, different benefits, and different onuses, rules, and impediments, definitely.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;[…] and a new confiscatory wealth tax on assets, not the income from assets, but a tax on what you already own.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 238</div></div><p>Yeah, we have that in Switzerland. Quit yer bitching like its completely unworkable. Fucking Americans, think they&rsquo;re so special. Bigboy pants time. Time to start adulting.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Even theoretically, the money to pay for those programs doesn’t exist.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 239</div></div><p>It does. Other people have it. Even if future debt doesn&rsquo;t work, we can take back value from those who have stolen it from us and hoarded it. There&rsquo;s a decent chance that, by the time we get done taking it, that it won&rsquo;t be worth anything anymore, but the money is technically <em>available</em>.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;By the logic of the day, “inclusion” and “diversity” are achieved by forbidding the transmission of ideas, shutting down debate, and creating new racially segregated college dorms.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 244</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The universities beget a class of what Nassim Taleb prankishly called “intellectuals yet idiots,”63 hierophants trafficking in fads and falsehoods, conveyed in esoteric jargon larded with psychobabble in support of a therapeutic crypto-Gnostic crusade bent on transforming human nature to fit the wished-for template of a world where anything goes. In fact, they have only produced a new intellectual despotism worthy of Stalin, Mao Zedong, and Pol Pot.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 244</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;It should be obvious that so much of the legislated efforts to assist black America didn’t work out as expected and instead produced tragic unintended consequences, starting with the income distribution policies that promoted single-mother parenting and the absence of fathers in the lives of their children.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 246</div></div><p>Sometimes I wonder if he&rsquo;s being deliberately obtuse or whether he really doesn&rsquo;t know about the new Jim Crow. Fathers have a hard time being in the home when they&rsquo;re imprisoned at the rates that black men are.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Hung out to dry economically, this class of whites fell into many of the same behaviors as the poor blacks before them: out-of-wedlock births, absent fathers, drug abuse, crime.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 247</div></div><p>You could spare a few words to note that these features are part of the class war of the rich against the poor. They are side-effects of the monied class squeezing value and labor from stones.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;On the Right, Karl Rove expressed this point of view some years ago when he bragged (of the George W. Bush White House) that “we make our own reality,” and the Left says nearly the same thing in the post-structuralist, narcissist malarkey of academia: Your “lived experience” is your truth.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 248</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The toolkit of the Enlightenment—reason, empiricism—doesn’t work very well in this socioeconomic hall of mirrors, so all that baggage is discarded for the idea that reality is just a social construct—just whatever story you feel like telling about it—and what you report your feelings to be.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 248</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The people struggle to find who to blame and what to do. One thing after another obstructs their ability to carry on, to make a living, to find satisfactory relationships, to protect their offspring, to find purpose and meaning in daily existence—until merely being in this world seems like the worst sort of swindle.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 248</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;A number of ruins from the industrial age still stand around town. There’s a set of dressed stone bridge piers from the early railroad (1869) standing mutely in the river on the south side of town. They are partially collapsed now, with trees sprouting out of them. The trestle they supported is long gone. Last summer I went swimming in the Gardon River in France under a Roman aqueduct that still spans the stream after nearly two thousand years. It amazes me how quickly the landscape has swallowed up the residue of industrial America, and how brief that heyday was.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 256</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The railroad connected with the industrial city of Troy, New York, thirty miles south, and from there, you could connect with passenger trains to Boston and New York City. The journey from the village down to Manhattan took five hours altogether in the 1920s, including the change of trains. The drive today takes at least four hours—of intense concentration behind the wheel—sometimes longer in terrifying weather, with tractor-trailers bum-rushing you in the passing lane.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 256</div></div>      </div>
      </div>
        <div class="footer">
    <div class="footer-data"><div class="footer-links"><ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/contact.php" title="">Contact</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/support.php" title="">Support</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/privacy.php" title="">Privacy</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/rights.php" title="">Rights</a></li></ul></div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="copyright">Copyright (c) 1999-2026 earthli.com. All Rights Reserved.</div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="versions">Powered by <ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore/app_news.php">earthli News 3.7</a></li><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore" title="">earthli WebCore&trade; 3.7</a></li></ul></div></div>    </div>
      </div>
  </div>  </body>
</html>
]]>
  </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
      <title type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[Masque of the Red Death by Edgar Allen Poe (1842; read in 2020)]]>
  </title>
    <id>https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3995</id>
    <link href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3995"/>
    <updated>2020-10-18T12:29:06+02:00</updated>
    <author>
        <name type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[Marco von Ballmoos]]>
  </name>
      <uri>https://earthli.com/users/marco</uri>
    </author>
      <summary type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<blockquote class="quote abstract "><div>Disclaimer: these are notes I took while reading this book. They include citations I found interesting or enlightening or particularly well-written. In some cases, I&rsquo;ve pointed out which of these applies to which citation; in others, I have not. Any benefit you gain from reading these notes is... [<a class="complete-text-link" href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3995">More</a>]</div></blockquote>]]>
  </summary>
      <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<html lang="en">
  <head>
    <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/themes/ice.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/fonts/raleway.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/core/medium.css">
  </head>
  <body>
<div class="style-controls">  <div class="page">
    <div class="page-body">
<div class="info-box-top">
<p>
Published by <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_user.php?name=marco" title="Marco von Ballmoos" class="visible">marco</a> on <span class="date-time">18. Oct 2020 12:29:06 (GMT-5)</span>
</p>
</div>
      <div class="text-flow wide">
  <blockquote class="quote abstract "><div>Disclaimer: these are notes I took while reading this book. They include citations I found interesting or enlightening or particularly well-written. In some cases, I&rsquo;ve pointed out which of these applies to which citation; in others, I have not. Any benefit you gain from reading these notes is purely incidental to the purpose they serve of reminding me what I once read. Please see Wikipedia for a summary if I&rsquo;ve failed to provide one sufficient for your purposes. If my notes serve to trigger an interest in this book, then I&rsquo;m happy for you.</div></blockquote><p>This is a (very) <a href="https://gutenberg.org/ebooks/1064">short story</a> (<cite><a href="http://gutenberg.org/">Project Gutenberg</a></cite>) by the master of horror about a masked ball held by a Prince Prospero in his sumptuous castle. The castle has 7 room, each decorated in a different color, with the final room painted black and illuminated by an eldritch crimson glare. An cowled, uninvited guest slithers through the proceedings, eventually revealing itself as not a man, but a disease that takes its victims quickly and unmistakably.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;There were sharp pains, and sudden dizziness, and then profuse bleeding at the pores, with dissolution. The scarlet stains upon the body and especially upon the face of the victim, were the pest ban which shut him out from the aid and from the sympathy of his fellow-men. And the whole seizure, progress and termination of the disease, were the incidents of half an hour.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 1</div></div>      </div>
      </div>
        <div class="footer">
    <div class="footer-data"><div class="footer-links"><ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/contact.php" title="">Contact</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/support.php" title="">Support</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/privacy.php" title="">Privacy</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/rights.php" title="">Rights</a></li></ul></div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="copyright">Copyright (c) 1999-2026 earthli.com. All Rights Reserved.</div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="versions">Powered by <ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore/app_news.php">earthli News 3.7</a></li><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore" title="">earthli WebCore&trade; 3.7</a></li></ul></div></div>    </div>
      </div>
  </div>  </body>
</html>
]]>
  </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
      <title type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[Naked Lunch by William S. Burroughs (1959; read in 2020)]]>
  </title>
    <id>https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=4066</id>
    <link href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=4066"/>
    <updated>2020-10-18T12:09:35+02:00</updated>
    <author>
        <name type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[Marco von Ballmoos]]>
  </name>
      <uri>https://earthli.com/users/marco</uri>
    </author>
      <summary type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<blockquote class="quote abstract "><div>Disclaimer: these are notes I took while reading this book. They include citations I found interesting or enlightening or particularly well-written. In some cases, I&rsquo;ve pointed out which of these applies to which citation; in others, I have not. Any benefit you gain from reading these notes is... [<a class="complete-text-link" href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=4066">More</a>]</div></blockquote>]]>
  </summary>
      <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<html lang="en">
  <head>
    <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/themes/ice.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/fonts/raleway.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/core/medium.css">
  </head>
  <body>
<div class="style-controls">  <div class="page">
    <div class="page-body">
<div class="info-box-top">
<p>
Published by <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_user.php?name=marco" title="Marco von Ballmoos" class="visible">marco</a> on <span class="date-time">18. Oct 2020 12:09:35 (GMT-5)</span>
</p>
</div>
      <div class="text-flow wide">
  <blockquote class="quote abstract "><div>Disclaimer: these are notes I took while reading this book. They include citations I found interesting or enlightening or particularly well-written. In some cases, I&rsquo;ve pointed out which of these applies to which citation; in others, I have not. Any benefit you gain from reading these notes is purely incidental to the purpose they serve of reminding me what I once read. Please see Wikipedia for a summary if I&rsquo;ve failed to provide one sufficient for your purposes. If my notes serve to trigger an interest in this book, then I&rsquo;m happy for you.</div></blockquote><p>This book is a stream-of-consciousness brain-dump of a junkie. In the afterword, Burroughs reveals—in refreshingly erudite prose—that he wrote some of the content the book during his withdrawal from a 15-year morphine addiction.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The addict regards his body impersonally as an instrument to absorb the medium in which he lives, evaluates his tissue with the cold hands of a horse trader. “No use trying to hit there.” Dead fish eyes flick over a ravaged vein.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 57</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The addict runs on junk time. His body is his clock, and junk runs through it like an hourglass. Time has meaning for him only with reference to his need. Then he makes his abrupt intrusion into the time of others, and, like all Outsiders, all Petitioners, he must wait, unless he happens to mesh with non-junk time.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 180</div></div><p>Much of the rest of the book was originally arose from correspondence with Allen Ginsberg, one of Burroughs&rsquo;s best friends and collaborators (and also a member of the &ldquo;Beat Generation&rdquo;) and with whom he was trying to kindle a romantic relationship.</p>
<p>The book is a labor of love by many people who helped Burroughs edit and shape the final work. He was adamant about its composition—even to the point of insisting on retaining obvious typos as intentional—and wanted it to read like it does. No chapter headings. Disjointed flow. No notion of storyline or chronology. Just a strong sense of common theme: on the surface, a story filtered through the mind of the junkie who wants nothing but more junk, but below that, a story of how a thinking person can hope to make their way through a world adamantly opposed to independent thought.</p>
<p>In the first third—the book was originally intended to be published in three parts, but all parties involved agreed that it stood better as a single work—there is a bit of a story of a man named Bill who flees cross-country to Mexico, with a rotating cast of companions—some real, some not—and an infinitude of places to cop and shack up and nod.</p>
<p>He writes of psychotic doctors and dealers and pushers and users. The hyperbolic prose freely mixes real-world events with fevered imaginings and dreams and heavily metaphoric renderings (e.g. the many, many hangings in the middle of the book involving people who keep coming back, again and again, in what would turn out—for the most part—to be faked hangings partaken by hangman and accused for a supposedly unparalleled sexual gratification).</p>
<p>He describes drugs and their effects lucidly, then disjointedly, weaving seemingly nonsensical prose—with heavy use of ellipses—into at-times vivid renderings of immediately recognizable real-world situations and locations. As Burroughs himself stated: it is not a novel. It is, at times, an epic poem.</p>
<p>The book does not tell a story—it delivers impressions, often very powerful ones. It is a maelstrom of words from an author whose deliberate rawness hides his frightening intelligence from anyone so inclined to allow it to be hidden. That is, if you want to be offended, you will be, missing out on the deeper message that the world itself is far more deeply offensive to anyone with a sensitivity to hypocrisy and an undiminished sense of justice. The raw language is  the only way to treat bad things honestly.</p>
<p>The at-time maniacal prose nearly always reveals the author to be a clinical observer—especially of people—recording exactly the details of a person or place that snaps it into sharp relief for the reader (for whom memory fills the spaces left by the skeleton of Burroughs&rsquo;s description).</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The café was built into one side of a stone ramp at the bottom of a high white canyon of masonry. Faces of The City poured through silent as fish, stained with vile addictions and insect lusts. The lighted café was a diving bell, cable broken, settling into black depths.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 44</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Up through the river towns, Babahoya, Quevedo, Puerto Limón, black Stetsons and the grey malaria faces color of dirty paper, muzzle-loading shotguns and vultures pecking in the streets&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 262</div></div><p>Sometimes he&rsquo;ll riff on what is almost certainly a real detail, an actual memory, supplementing it with a newly formed invention or one half-remembered from when he&rsquo;d picked up the detail. He&rsquo;ll tell of a young man he saw on a bus, then spend paragraphs describing the man&rsquo;s history or future, though he neither never knew him nor ever would, instead stitching the real world to the richer, more interesting, parallel one playing out in his head.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;A few sentences plucked from the whirl of details in his mind, of the world only he sees with a history only he knows.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 73</div></div><p>As noted above, the strong undercurrent of the book—for lack of a better word—is a surprisingly rational scream from a highly pragmatic man who did not prejudge, but instead partook. It warns of a world gone askew, in which those who can, and those who realize, and those who are wise to its mendacity, take refuge from it in the drugs that it forbids. The nation knows that its captives can escape its raw horror using drugs, and thus deprives its residents of all but the officially sanctioned varieties (e.g. alcohol and anti-depressants), guilting people into participating in the madness of American society instead. [1] In 1959 as today. Sorry, Bill; not much has changed. Not for most of us.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;“I can feel the heat closing in,” Burroughs writes, setting the tone for the entire book, although such heat has less to do with the police than with the futility of freedom in a world of systems designed to keep us from ourselves&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 290 (from the Afterword)</div></div><h2>Citations</h2><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;It is amusing to read reviews of Burroughs that try to classify his books as nonbooks. It is a little like trying to criticize the sartorial and verbal manifestations of a man who is knocking on the door to explain that flames are leaping from the roof of our home.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">From the Foreword/Introduction by <cite>Marshall McLuhan</cite></div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The physical changes were slow at first, then jumped forward in black klunks, falling through his slack tissue, washing away the human lines . . . In his place of total darkness mouth and eyes are one organ that leaps forward to snap with transparent teeth . . . but no organ is constant as regards either function or position . . . sex organs sprout anywhere . . . rectums open, defecate and close . . . the entire organism changes color and consistency in split-second adjustments . . .&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 9</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Provident junkies, known as squirrels, keep stashes against a bust. Every time I take a shot I let a few drops fall into my vest pocket, the lining is stiff with stuff. I had a plastic dropper in my shoe and a safety pin stuck in my belt. You know how this pin and dropper routine is put down: “She seized a safety pin caked with blood and rust, gouged a great hole in her leg which seemed to hang open like an obscene, festering mouth waiting for unspeakable congress with the dropper which she now plunged out of sight into the gaping wound. But her hideous galvanized need (hunger of insects in dry places) has broken the dropper off deep in the flesh of her ravaged thigh (looking rather like a poster on soil erosion).&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 10</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;So we pour it in a Pernod bottle and start for New Orleans past iridescent lakes and orange gas flares, and swamps and garbage heaps, alligators crawling around in broken bottles and tin cans, neon arabesques of motels, marooned pimps scream obscenities at passing cars from islands of rubbish . . .&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 13</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;(Slunks are underage calves trailing afterbirths and bacteria, generally in an unsanitary and unfit condition. A calf may not be sold as food until it reaches a minimum age of six weeks. Prior to that time it is classified as a slunk. Slunk trafficking is subject to a heavy penalty.)&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 27</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;They are all stupid peasants, and the worst of all peasants are the so-called educated. These people should not only be prevented from learning to read, but from learning to talk as well. No need to prevent them from thinking; nature has done that.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 40</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The shoe shine boy put on his hustling smile and looked up into the Sailor’s dead, cold, undersea eyes, eyes without a trace of warmth or lust or hate or any feeling the boy had ever experienced in himself or seen in another, at once cold and intense, impersonal and predatory.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 43</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;He laughed, black insect laughter that seemed to serve some obscure function of orientation like a bat’s squeak. The Sailor laughed three times. He stopped laughing and hung there motionless listening down into himself. He had picked up the silent frequency of junk. His face smoothed out like yellow wax over the high cheekbones. He waited half a cigarette. The Sailor knew how to wait. But his eyes burned in a hideous dry hunger.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 44</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The café was built into one side of a stone ramp at the bottom of a high white canyon of masonry. Faces of The City poured through silent as fish, stained with vile addictions and insect lusts. The lighted café was a diving bell, cable broken, settling into black depths.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 44</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The Sailor’s face dissolved. His mouth undulated forward on a long tube and sucked in the black fuzz, vibrating in supersonic peristalsis, disappeared in a silent, pink explosion.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 45</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;At all levels criss-cross of bridges, cat walks, cable cars. Catatonic youths dressed as women in gowns of burlap and rotten rags, faces heavily and crudely painted in bright colors over a stratum of beatings, arabesques of broken, suppurating scars to the pearly bone, push against the passer-by in silent clinging insistence.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 45</div></div><p>Shades of Gibson or, rather, Gibson&rsquo;s style is similar to Burroughs.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Addicts of Mugwump fluid are known as Reptiles. A number of these flow over chairs with their flexible bones and black-pink flesh. A fan of green cartilage covered with hollow, erectile hairs through which the Reptiles absorb the fluid sprouts from behind each ear. The fans, which move from time to time touched by invisible currents, serve also some form of communication known only to Reptiles. During the biennial Panics when the raw, peeled Dream Police storm the City the Mugwumps take refuge in the deepest crevices of the wall, sealing themselves in clay cubicles, and remain for weeks in biostasis. In those days of grey terror the Reptiles dart about faster and faster, scream past each other at supersonic speed, their flexible skulls flapping in black winds of insect agony.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 46</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Egypt is a worm gets into your kidneys and grows to an enormous size. Ultimately the kidney is just a thin shell around the worm. Intrepid gourmets esteem the flesh of The Worm above all other delicacies. It is said to be unspeakably toothsome . . . An Interzone coroner known as Autopsy Ahmed made a fortune trafficking The Worm.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 50</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;(Espontáneo is a bull-fighting term for a member of the audience who leaps down into the ring, pulls out a concealed cape and attempts a few passes with the bull before he is dragged out of the ring.)&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 52</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;There is no withdrawal syndrome with C. It is a need of the brain alone–a need without body and without feeling. Earthbound ghost need. The craving for C lasts only a few hours as long as the C channels are stimulated. Then you forget it. Eukodol is like a combination of junk and C. Trust the Germans to concoct some really evil shit. Eukodol like morphine is six times stronger than codeine. Heroin six times stronger than morphine. Dihydro-oxy-heroin should be six times stronger than heroin. Quite possible to develop a drug so habit-forming that one shot would cause lifelong addiction.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 55</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The needle slides in easily on the edge of a callus. I feel around. Suddenly a thin column of blood shoots up into the syringe, for a moment sharp and solid as a red cord.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 55</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Look down at my filthy trousers, haven’t been changed in months . . . The days glide by strung on a syringe with a long thread of blood . . . I am forgetting sex and all sharp pleasures of the body–a grey, junk-bound ghost.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 56</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Running out of veins and out of money.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 56</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The addict regards his body impersonally as an instrument to absorb the medium in which he lives, evaluates his tissue with the cold hands of a horse trader. “No use trying to hit there.” Dead fish eyes flick over a ravaged vein.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 57</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;An old garbage collector, face fine and yellow as Chinese ivory, blows The Blast on his dented brass horn, wakes the Spanish pimp with a hard-on. Whore staggers out through dust and shit and litter of dead kittens, carrying bales of aborted foetuses, broken condoms, bloody Kotex, shit wrapped in bright color comics.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 63</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;A vast still harbor of iridescent water. Deserted gas well flares on the smoky horizon. Stink of oil and sewage. Sick sharks swim through the black water, belch sulphur from rotting livers, ignore a bloody, broken Icarus.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 64</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;A.J. whips out a cutlass and begins decapitating the American Girls. He sings lustily:</p>
<p>&ldquo;Fifteen men on a dead man’s chest<br>
Yo Ho Ho and a bottle of rum.<br>
Drink and the devil had done for the rest<br>
Yo Ho Ho and a bottle of rum.</p>
<p>&ldquo;Mr. Hyslop, bored and resigned: “Oh Gawd! He’s at it again.” He waves the Jolly Roger listlessly.&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 70</div></div><p>Reminds me of the surrealism of Jean Luc Goddard.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Dilapidated Diseuse in 1920 clothes like she sleep in them ever since undulates across dreary neon-lighted Chicago street . . . dead weight of the Dear Dead Days hanging in the air like an earth-bound ghost.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 73</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;A few sentences plucked from the whirl of details in his mind, of the world only he sees with a history only he knows.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 73</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Johnny and Mary in hotel room (music of “East St. Louis Toodleoo”). Warm spring wind blows faded pink curtains in through open window . . . Frogs croak in vacant lots where corn grows and boys catch little green garter snakes under broken limestone stelae stained with shit and threaded with rusty barbed wire . . .&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 83</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Only the laughing bones remain, flesh over the hills and far away with the dawn wind and a train whistle.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 100</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The screaming skull rolls up the back stairs to bite off the cock of erring husband taking dour advantage of his wife’s earache to do that which is inconvenient. The young landlubber dons a southwester, beats his wife to death in the shower . . .&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 110</div></div><p>What?</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;(A cooperative on the other hand can live without the state. That is the road to follow. The building up of independent units to meet needs of the people who participate in the functioning of the unit. A bureau operates on opposite principle of inventing needs to justify its existence.)&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 112</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;BERGER (leaps up): “I got the health! . . . All the health! Enough health for the whole world, the whole fuckin world!! I cure everybody!”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 117</div></div><p>This sounds a lot like Trump crowing after he had COVID-19. I wonder if someone noticed the similarity?</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Salvador Hassan O’Leary, the After Birth Tycoon, is also involved. That is, one of his subsidiary companies has made unspecified contributions, and one of his subsidiary personalities is attached to the organization in an advisory capacity without in any way committing himself to, or associating himself with, the policies, actions or objectives of Islam Inc.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 122</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;A professional witch was called in to make Sheik Aracknid’s replica cultures forever sterile . . . As the witch was preparing to loose a blast of anti-orgones, Benway told him: “Don’t knock yourself out. Friedrich’s ataxia will clean out that replica nest. I studied neurology under Professor Fingerbottom in Vienna . . . and he knew every nerve in your body. Magnificent old thing . . . Came to a sticky end . . . His falling piles blew out the Duc de Ventre’s Hispano Suiza and wrapped around the rear wheel. He was completely gutted, leaving an empty shell sitting there on the giraffe skin upholstery . . . Even the eyes and brain went, with a horrible schlupping sound. The Duc de Ventre says he will carry that ghastly schlup to his mausoleum.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 138</div></div><p>I&rsquo;m over halfway through the book and I think he&rsquo;s pretty much at peak non sequitur now: there are some recurring threads and recurring characters, but it&rsquo;s mostly just sparse and simultaneously rich detail shining a focused disc of light on a deranged phantasm, a corner of one reality or another.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;It may be said that the average Divisionist lives in a continual crisis of fear and rage, unable to achieve either the self-righteous complacency of the Senders or the relaxed depravity of the Liquefactionists . . . However the parties are not in practice separate but blend in all combinations. The Factualists are Anti-Liquefactionist, Anti-Divisionist, and above all Anti-Sender.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 140</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;He taunts and tantalizes with a sense of this world, fleeting as a dream.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 140</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;Not when I got that sweet little ol’ fifteen year old thing . . . You know that yaller girl used to work in Marylou’s Hair Straightening and Skin Bleach Parlor over in Nigga town.’</p>
<p>&ldquo;‘Getting that dark chicken meat, Arch? Gettin’ that coon pone?’ </p>
<p>&ldquo;‘Gettin’ it steady, Doc. Gettin’ it steady. Well, feller say duty is goosing me. Gotta get back to the old crank case.’</p>
<p>&ldquo;‘I’ll bet she needs a grease job worst way.’</p>
<p>&ldquo;‘Doc, she sure is a dry hole . . . Well, thanks for the paregoric.’&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 146</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The deal drags on for months. They engage the services of an Expeditor. Finally Marvie emerges with a check for 42 Turkestani kurus drawn on an anonymous bank in South America, to clear through Amsterdam, a procedure that will take eleven months more or less.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 150</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;The Island was a British Military and Naval station directly opposite the Zone. England holds the Island on yearly rent-free lease, and every year the Lease and Permit of Residence is formally renewed. The entire population turns out–attendance is compulsory–and gathers at the municipal dump. The President of the Island is required by custom to crawl across the garbage on his stomach and deliver the Permit of Residence and Renewal of the Lease, signed by every citizen of the Island, to The Resident Governor who stands resplendent in dress uniform.</p>
<p>&ldquo;The Governor takes the permit and shoves it into his coat pocket: “Well,” he says with a tight smile, “so you’ve decided to let us stay another year have you? Very good of you. And everyone is happy about it? . . . Is there anyone who isn’t happy about it?”</p>
<p>&ldquo;Soldiers in jeeps sweep mounted machine guns back and forth across the crowd with a slow, searching movement. “Everybody happy. Well that’s fine.” </p>
<p>&ldquo;He turns jovially to the prostrate President. “I’ll keep your papers in case I get caught short. Haw haw haw.”</p>
<p>&ldquo;His loud, metallic laugh rings out across the dump, and the crowd laughs with him under the searching guns.&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 152</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The Sailor spoke in his feeling voice that reassembles in your head, spelling out the words with cold fingers: “Your connection is broken, kid.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 167</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The addict runs on junk time. His body is his clock, and junk runs through it like an hourglass. Time has meaning for him only with reference to his need. Then he makes his abrupt intrusion into the time of others, and, like all Outsiders, all Petitioners, he must wait, unless he happens to mesh with non-junk time.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 180</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;There is only one thing a writer can write about: what is in front of his senses at the moment of writing . . . I am a recording instrument . . . I do not presume to impose “story” “plot” “continuity” . . . Insofar as I succeed in Direct recording of certain areas of psychic process I may have limited function . . . I am not an entertainer . . .&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 184</div></div><p>Honest and lucid finally.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;“What are you thinking?” says the squirming American Tourist . . . To which I reply: “Morphine having depressed my hypothalamus, seat of libido and emotion, and since the front brain acts only at second hand with back-brain titillation, being a vicarious type citizen can only get his kicks from behind, I must report virtual absence of cerebral event. I am aware of your presence, but since it has for me no affective connotation, my affect having been disconnect by the junk man for the nonpayment, I am not innarested in your doings . . . Go or come, shit or fuck yourself with a rasp or an asp–’tis well done and fitting for a queen–but The Dead and The Junky don’t care . . .” They are Inscrutable.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 192</div></div><h2>Appendices</h2><p>All of the following citations come from the &ldquo;extras&rdquo; included at the end of the book. The section begins with a few essays and letters from Burroughs himself, by way of explication over the decades after the book&rsquo;s initial publication. After that, there are alternate formulations of scenes included in the book—kind of like &ldquo;Deleted Scenes&rdquo; on a DVD. Finally, there is the official Afterword by the two authors who put together this extended edition.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Junk is quantitative and accurately measurable. The more junk you use the less you have and the more you have the more you use.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 200</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The addict in street who must have junk to live is the one irreplaceable factor in the junk equation. When there are no more addicts to buy junk there will be no junk traffic. As long as junk need exists, someone will service it.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 202</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;So far as I know, England is the only country to apply this method to the junk problem. They have about five hundred quarantined addicts in the U.K. In another generation when the quarantined addicts die off and pain killers operating on a non-junk principle are discovered, the junk virus will be like smallpox, a closed chapter–a medical curiosity.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 202</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;I lived in one room in the Native Quarter of Tangier. I had not taken a bath in a year nor changed my clothes or removed them except to stick a needle every hour in the fibrous grey wooden flesh of terminal addiction. I never cleaned or dusted the room. Empty ampule boxes and garbage piled to the ceiling. Light and water long since turned off for non-payment. I did absolutely nothing. I could look at the end of my shoe for eight hours. I was only roused to action when the hourglass of junk ran out. If a friend came to visit–and they rarely did since who or what was left to visit–I sat there not caring that he had entered my field of vision–a grey screen always blanker and fainter–and not caring when he walked out of it.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 202</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Certain passages in the book that have been called pornographic were written as a tract against Capital Punishment in the manner of Jonathan Swift’s Modest Proposal. These sections are intended to reveal capital punishment as the obscene, barbaric and disgusting anachronism that it&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 206</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;junky does not want to be warm, he wants to be Cool-Cooler-COLD. But he wants The Cold like he wants His Junk–NOT OUTSIDE where it does him no good but INSIDE so he can sit around with a spine like a frozen hydraulic jack . . . his metabolism approaching Absolute ZERO. TERMINAL addicts often go two months without a bowel move and the intestines make with sit-down-adhesions–Wouldn’t you?–requiring the intervention of an apple corer or its surgical equivalent. . . . Such is life in The Old Ice House. Why move around and waste TIME?&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 208</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The use of morphine leads to a metabolic dependence on morphine. Morphine becomes a biologic need like water and the user may die if he is suddenly deprived of it. The diabetic will die without insulin, but he is not addicted to insulin. His need for insulin was not brought about by the use of insulin. He needs insulin to maintain a normal metabolism. The addict needs morphine to maintain a morphine metabolism, and so avoid the excruciatingly painful return to a normal metabolism.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 214</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Imperceptible reduction is likely to be endless reduction. When the addict seeks cure, he has, in most cases, already experienced withdrawal symptoms many times. He expects an unpleasant ordeal and he is prepared to endure it. But if the pain of withdrawal is spread over two months instead of ten days he may not be able to endure it. It is not the intensity but the duration of pain that breaks the will to resist.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 219</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;In Persia where opium is sold without control in opium shops, 70 percent of the adult population is addicted.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 230</div></div><p>Any truth to this? Sound extremely far-fetched. It turns out to be a gross exaggeration, as detailed in <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Opium_in_Iran">Opium in Iran</a> (<cite><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/">Wikipedia</a></cite>).</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Naked Lunch evolved slowly and unpredictably over nine tumultuous years in the life of its author, William Seward Burroughs. The novel was not created according to a predetermined outline or plan, but accumulated through a decade of travel and turmoil on four continents and continually edited and reedited not only by its author but also by his close friends Allen Ginsberg and Jack Kerouac.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 233</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Thus, by its very nature, Naked Lunch resists the idea of a fixed text, and our re-creation of the history of its composition and editing has required a careful review of many disparate typescripts in various archival collections, as well as the two first editions, in 1959 (Oympia Press) and 1962 (Grove Press)–the texts of which are quite different.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 233</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;No, it wasn’t in New Orleans, because Al was there–or was he? He couldn’t have been there. But I can feel him there.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 254</div></div><p>This is an excellent description/example of what it feels like to realize that a memory is flat-out wrong, but that it still feels so real, a reality that, even in recognition of its unreality—or, at best, gross inaccuracy—still retains a hold strong enough to lull one back into believing that it actually <em>did</em> happen.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The U.S.A. is burned down dust bowl, cattle and junkies low for relief as they nuzzle the dry opium pipes and empty caps . . .&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 257</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;In the gathering grey twilight of junk . . . shooting every hour–looked at my shoe all day . . . grey pictures on a grey screen, fading slower and slower . . . Your time is running out almost gone it was panic got me to the airport and on the plane with an eau de cologne bottle full of junk solution . . . fixed in the airport washroom at Paris, on to the grey [streets of London] . . . Apomorphine puked up my monkey in bloody pieces into a basin carried out . . . flesh hangs on the bones the untenanted body, and then suddenly you are back inside moving and I walked through Hyde Park . . .&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 257</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;There is something about Chicago that paralyzes the spirit under a dead weight of a formalism dictated by hoodlums, a hierarchy of decorticated wops . . . And everywhere the smell of atrophied gangsters, the dead weight of those dear dead days hanging in the air like rancid ectoplasm . . . You suffocate in the immediate past, still palpable, quivering like an earthbound ghost, slipping around the corner in a junky’s body stealing out of a night spot, the old time jazz or just the soul of the Twenties disembodied will hit you in Lincoln Park, or there on the Near North Side at Dearborn and Halsted the feel of the Twenties will hit you.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 258</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Up through the river towns, Babahoya, Quevedo, Puerto Limón, black Stetsons and the grey malaria faces color of dirty paper, muzzle-loading shotguns and vultures pecking in the streets&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 262</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;He died testing a condemned parachute misconverted and reconverted by Trak, Inc.–a scandal involving a sinister Albanian Fixer known as Mr. IN who got his start as a Congressional lavatory attendant . . .&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 263</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;American suburbs where the male soul rots on transplanted sod […]&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 267</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Lee walked back the way he had come through streets twisted in a slow arthritis of masonry . . . Up the winding stairs warped by the late unsteady returns of a vehement drunkard so that now you stagger up those stairs drunk or sober.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 269</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Every day die a little. It takes up the time.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 280</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;The winged horse and the mosaic of iron cut the sky to blue cake . . . </p>
<p>&ldquo;On crystal balconies pensive angels study pink fingernails . . . Gilt flakes fall through the sunlight . . .&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 283</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Bougainvillea covers the limestone steps . . . Poisoned pigeons rain from the Northern Lights, plop with burning wings into dry canal . . . The Reservoirs are empty . . . Blue stairs end spiral down suffocate . . . where brass statues crash through the hungry squares and alleys of the gaping city . . .&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 283</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Like I say The Reader will frequently find the same thing said in the same words. This is not carelessness nor is it for The Infatuation With Sound Of Own Words Dept. . . . It indicates space-time juxtaposition . . . a folding in and back (the universe is curved, feller say) . . .&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 288</div></div><p>Breaking the fourth wall.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;if Kerouac was the chronicler, William S. Burroughs stood out as the intellectual center, the most edgy and uncompromising of them all. He was Old Bull Lee, gentleman junkie, Texas pot farmer, the slightly older mentor who had initiated Kerouac and Allen Ginsberg into the underground.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 289</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Little wonder, then, that at sixteen, I could not read it, for I didn’t know what I was looking at. (I finally did manage to navigate Naked Lunch in college, although even then, there was much about it that I missed.) Indeed,&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 290</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The tension this embodies—between the urge to write and the inadequacies of language, between the incomprehensibility of everything and our inherent need to make some accommodation with the chaos, even if only to disengage—resides at the heart of Naked Lunch, which remains as relevant and relentless as it has ever been.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 290</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;“I can feel the heat closing in,” Burroughs writes, setting the tone for the entire book, although such heat has less to do with the police than with the futility of freedom in a world of systems designed to keep us from ourselves&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 290</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Burroughs had always been an enemy of hypocrisy.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 290</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Trocchi is smart, but Burroughs, as it turns out, may be smarter, aware that even the most extreme philosophical position is still a philosophical position, offering only the illusion of control.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 290</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;“The Word is divided into units which be all in one piece and should so be taken,” Burroughs declares, “but the pieces can be had in any order being tied up back and forth in and out fore and aft like an innaresting sex arrangement. This book spill off the page in all directions, kaleidoscope of vistas, medley of tunes and street noises, farts and riot yips and the slamming steel shutters of commerce, screams of pain and pathos and screams plain pathic, copulating cats and outraged squawk of the displaced bullhead, prophetic mutterings of brujo in nutmeg trance, snapping necks and screaming mandrakes, sigh of orgasm, heroin silent as dawn in the thirsty cells, Radio Cairo screaming like a berserk tobacco auction, and flutes of Ramadan fanning the sick junky like a gentle lush worker in the grey subway dawn feeling with delicate fingers for the green folding crackle . . .&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 290</div></div><p><hr></p>
<div class="footnote-reference"><span id="footnote_DRAFTABLE_ENTRY_4066_1_body" class="footnote-number">[1]</span> <p>That formulation reminds me of a citation from <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/app]/view_article.php?id=3538"><em>Industrial Society and its Future</em> by <em>Theodore Kaczynski</em></a>,</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;In effect, antidepressants are a means of modifying an individual’s internal state in such a way as to enable him to tolerate social conditions that he would otherwise find intolerable.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div>      </div>
      </div>
        <div class="footer">
    <div class="footer-data"><div class="footer-links"><ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/contact.php" title="">Contact</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/support.php" title="">Support</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/privacy.php" title="">Privacy</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/rights.php" title="">Rights</a></li></ul></div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="copyright">Copyright (c) 1999-2026 earthli.com. All Rights Reserved.</div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="versions">Powered by <ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore/app_news.php">earthli News 3.7</a></li><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore" title="">earthli WebCore&trade; 3.7</a></li></ul></div></div>    </div>
      </div>
  </div>  </body>
</html>
]]>
  </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
      <title type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[Book Recommendations for a Friend (July 2020)]]>
  </title>
    <id>https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=4061</id>
    <link href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=4061"/>
    <updated>2020-09-26T23:22:31+02:00</updated>
    <author>
        <name type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[Marco von Ballmoos]]>
  </name>
      <uri>https://earthli.com/users/marco</uri>
    </author>
      <summary type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<blockquote class="quote abstract "><div>I found a list of book recommendations I&rsquo;d made for a friend, tailored to his interests. I&rsquo;ve republished it here with some minor edits, in case anyone else is interested. The title links to my review and notes.</div></blockquote><p>This is a partial list of books I&rsquo;ve read since 2013 that I think you might be... [<a class="complete-text-link" href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=4061">More</a>]</p>
]]>
  </summary>
      <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<html lang="en">
  <head>
    <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/themes/ice.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/fonts/raleway.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/core/medium.css">
  </head>
  <body>
<div class="style-controls">  <div class="page">
    <div class="page-body">
<div class="info-box-top">
<p>
Published by <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_user.php?name=marco" title="Marco von Ballmoos" class="visible">marco</a> on <span class="date-time">26. Sep 2020 23:22:31 (GMT-5)</span>
</p>
</div>
      <div class="text-flow wide">
  <blockquote class="quote abstract "><div>I found a list of book recommendations I&rsquo;d made for a friend, tailored to his interests. I&rsquo;ve republished it here with some minor edits, in case anyone else is interested. The title links to my review and notes.</div></blockquote><p>This is a partial list of books I&rsquo;ve read since 2013 that I think you might be interested in. I&rsquo;ve included links to my reviews/notes/citations, if that helps.</p>
<p>I&rsquo;ve tried to break it up into rough groups. Many straddle categories. They&rsquo;re all good, but some are work and some are fun.</p>
<p>I haven&rsquo;t included any of the ones I know you&rsquo;ve already read.</p>
<h2>Non-fiction</h2><h3>History</h3><ul>
<li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3439">October: The Story of the Russian Revolution  (2017)</a> by <cite>China Mi&eacute;ville</cite></li>
<li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3709">Sapiens: A Brief History of Humankind  (2011)</a> by <cite>Yuval Noah Harari</cite></li>
<li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=%203429">The New Jim Crow  (2012)</a> by <cite>Michelle Alexander</cite></li>
<li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3407">The Road to Wigan Pier  (1937)</a> by <cite>George Orwell</cite></li>
<li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3711">Russia Without Putin: Money, Power and the Myths of the New Cold War  (2018)</a> by <cite>Tony Wood</cite></li></ul><h3>Science</h3><ul>
<li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3796">The Uninhabitable Earth: Life After Warming  (2019)</a> by <cite>David Wallace-Wells</cite></li></ul><h3>Biography / Autobiography</h3><ul>
<li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3450">The Making of Donald Trump  (2016)</a> by <cite>David Cay Johnston</cite></li>
<li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3798">Digging Up Mother  (2016)</a> by <cite>Doug Stanhope</cite></li>
<li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=%203430">Based on a True Story: Not a Memoir  (2016)</a> by <cite>Norm McDonald</cite></li></ul><h3>Sociology</h3><ul>
<li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3834">Rape: From Lucretia to #MeToo  (2019)</a> by <cite>Mithu Sanyal</cite></li></ul><h3>Economy</h3><ul>
<li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3136">Austerity: The History of a Dangerous Idea  (2013)</a> by <cite>Mark Blyth</cite></li>
<li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3179">First As Tragedy, Then As Farce  (2009)</a> by <cite>Slavoj Žižek</cite></li>
<li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3393">Rigged: How Globalization and the Rules of the Modern Economy Were Structured to Make the Rich Richer  (2016)</a> by <cite>Dean Baker</cite></li>
<li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3533">Adults in the Room: My Battle with the European and American Deep Establishment  (2017)</a> by <cite>Yanis Varoufakis</cite></li></ul><h2>Fiction</h2><h3>Classics</h3><ul>
<li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3452">In Cold Blood  (1966)</a> by <cite>Truman Capote</cite></li>
<li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3011">Moby-Dick; or, The Whale  (1851)</a> by <cite>Herman Melville</cite></li>
<li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3076">Crime and Punishment  (1866)</a> by <cite>Fyodor Dostoyevsky</cite></li>
<li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3135">One Flew over the Cuckoo’s Nest  (1962)</a> by <cite>Ken Kesey</cite></li></ul><h2>Adventure</h2><ul>
<li><div><a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3297">Revenge: A Novel  (2003)</a> by <cite>Stephen Fry</cite><div class=" "><p>Savage Season: A Hap and Leonard Novel (1990) by Joe R. Lansdale</p>
<p>No link, so here&rsquo;s my review:</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;This is the story of Leonard, a gay, black veteran of Vietnam and his friend Hap, a guy with few prospects and a lot of baggage. This pair are tangled up in a heist—or, rather, picking up the lost treasure from a heist gone wrong—planned by people with differing motives and histories. That Hap’s ex is involved makes it hard for him to think straight. Leonard is aware that the situation is far from ideal, but knows that he and Hap need the money.</p>
<p>&ldquo;The story weaves bygone days of 60s and 70s idealism with naked ambition and greed. Everything goes spectacularly south in an abattoir of a finale that would do a Tarantino film justice.&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div></div></li></ul><h3>Speculative Fiction</h3><ul>
<li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3294">We  (1921)</a> by <cite>Evgeny Zamyatin</cite></li>
<li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3152">The Futurological Congress: From the Memoirs of Ijon Tichy  (1971)</a> by <cite>Stanislaw Lem</cite></li>
<li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3134">The Handmaid’s Tale  (1985)</a> by <cite>Margaret Atwood</cite></li>
<li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3792">The Man in the High Castle  (1962)</a> by <cite>Philip K. Dick</cite></li>
<li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3742">Adjustment Day  (2018)</a> by <cite>Chuck Palahniuk</cite></li>
<li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3200">Blindness  (1995)</a> by <cite>Jose Saramago (translated to English by Giovanni Pontiero)</cite></li></ul><h2>Unclassified</h2><ul>
<li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3156">Rant: The Oral Biography of Buster Casey  (2008)</a> by <cite>Chuck Palahniuk</cite></li></ul><h3>Science Fiction / Fantasy</h3><p>Don&rsquo;t say &ldquo;I hate science fiction&rdquo;: I&rsquo;ve only included quality/not-really-science-fiction-y ones. They&rsquo;re great books with interesting ideas that have a kernel of speculation and take off from there. Most are rooted in the real world, though (e.g. Palahniuk and Gibson). I&rsquo;ve left off others that fall more squarely into sci-fi/fantasy.</p>
<ul>
<li><div class=" "><p>Up the Line (1969) by Robert Silverberg</p>
<p>No link, so here&rsquo;s part of my review:</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;A wonderful time-travel book in the grand tradition, with lots of sex. The title refers to the expression used in the future for going into the past; going “Down the line” moves you to the future relative to your current time. The book clearly shows the year in which it was written, as there is a whole lot of free lovin’ going on in the future. Time travel has become commonplace enough that there are guided tours of the past’s greatest moments. […]&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div></li>
<li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3865">The Peripheral  (2014)</a> by <cite>William Gibson</cite></li>
<li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3496">American Gods  (2002)</a> by <cite>Neil Gaiman</cite></li>
<li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3155">Cloud Atlas  (2004)</a> by <cite>David Mitchell</cite></li></ul>      </div>
      </div>
        <div class="footer">
    <div class="footer-data"><div class="footer-links"><ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/contact.php" title="">Contact</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/support.php" title="">Support</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/privacy.php" title="">Privacy</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/rights.php" title="">Rights</a></li></ul></div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="copyright">Copyright (c) 1999-2026 earthli.com. All Rights Reserved.</div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="versions">Powered by <ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore/app_news.php">earthli News 3.7</a></li><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore" title="">earthli WebCore&trade; 3.7</a></li></ul></div></div>    </div>
      </div>
  </div>  </body>
</html>
]]>
  </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
      <title type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[Amazon Book Recommendations getting weirder]]>
  </title>
    <id>https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=4059</id>
    <link href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=4059"/>
    <updated>2020-09-26T14:15:05+02:00</updated>
    <author>
        <name type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[Marco von Ballmoos]]>
  </name>
      <uri>https://earthli.com/users/marco</uri>
    </author>
      <summary type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<p>I was recently inspired to write about <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=4052">my Kindle&rsquo;s odd recommendations</a>. Since then, I&rsquo;ve gotten several more—with seemingly rapidly decreasing quality.</p>
<h2>Lady from the Stars</h2><p><span style="width: 292px; display: table"><span class="auto-content-inline"><a href="https://www.earthli.com/data/news/attachments/entry/4059/img_9408.jpeg"><img src="https://www.earthli.com/data/news/attachments/entry/4059/img_9408.jpeg" alt=" " style="width: 292px"></a></span><span class="auto-content-caption"><a href="https://www.earthli.com/data/news/attachments/entry/4059/img_9408.jpeg">Lady from the Stars</a></span></span></p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;A woman from another planet crashes on Earth. Her foes track her and plan to enslave Earth. Can she stop them and save... [<a class="complete-text-link" href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=4059">More</a>]&rdquo;</div></blockquote>]]>
  </summary>
      <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<html lang="en">
  <head>
    <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/themes/ice.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/fonts/raleway.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/core/medium.css">
  </head>
  <body>
<div class="style-controls">  <div class="page">
    <div class="page-body">
<div class="info-box-top">
<p>
Published by <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_user.php?name=marco" title="Marco von Ballmoos" class="visible">marco</a> on <span class="date-time">26. Sep 2020 14:15:05 (GMT-5)</span>
</p>
</div>
      <div class="text-flow wide">
  <p>I was recently inspired to write about <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=4052">my Kindle&rsquo;s odd recommendations</a>. Since then, I&rsquo;ve gotten several more—with seemingly rapidly decreasing quality.</p>
<h2>Lady from the Stars</h2><p><span style="width: 292px; display: table"><span class="auto-content-inline"><a href="https://www.earthli.com/data/news/attachments/entry/4059/img_9408.jpeg"><img src="https://www.earthli.com/data/news/attachments/entry/4059/img_9408.jpeg" alt=" " style="width: 292px"></a></span><span class="auto-content-caption"><a href="https://www.earthli.com/data/news/attachments/entry/4059/img_9408.jpeg">Lady from the Stars</a></span></span></p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;A woman from another planet crashes on Earth. Her foes track her and plan to enslave Earth. Can she stop them and save Earth and the man she loves?&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>I&rsquo;m going to guess that the author is simultaneously responsible for the cover art <em>and</em> the blurb. If the prose in the book measures up to the quality of the blurb, then this is a must-read. The bit about her doing whatever she ends up doing for a man sounds promising. Which planet are we talking about? Ah, yes…Earth.</p>
<h2>The Forever Woman</h2><p><span style="width: 285px; display: table"><span class="auto-content-inline"><a href="https://www.earthli.com/data/news/attachments/entry/4059/img_9488.jpeg"><img src="https://www.earthli.com/data/news/attachments/entry/4059/img_9488.jpeg" alt=" " style="width: 285px"></a></span><span class="auto-content-caption"><a href="https://www.earthli.com/data/news/attachments/entry/4059/img_9488.jpeg">The Forever Woman</a></span></span></p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Make him see you as the woman he wants to be with forever. […] When he pulls away, send him this 4-word text message on page 124 to get his attention and make him realize it was a mistake to pull away.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>Despite the seemingly gleeful cover art (which is at least a professional-looking photograph), the whole tone of these blurbs are more than vaguely threatening. I can only surmise from this that Amazon doesn&rsquo;t even know my gender—or is perhaps generously not making any assumptions. Still, nice-guy Amazon stays traditional and is trying to help me land a husband.</p>
<h2>Millennial Maxims</h2><p><span style="width: 264px; display: table"><span class="auto-content-inline"><a href="https://www.earthli.com/data/news/attachments/entry/4059/img_9502.jpeg"><img src="https://www.earthli.com/data/news/attachments/entry/4059/img_9502.jpeg" alt=" " style="width: 264px"></a></span><span class="auto-content-caption"><a href="https://www.earthli.com/data/news/attachments/entry/4059/img_9502.jpeg">Millennial Maxims</a></span></span></p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Millennial&rsquo;s see the world differently. Millennial&rsquo;s believe the world can change. The rise of a new generation is here, and deserves a new book.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>Despite starting out strong by spelling &ldquo;millennial&rdquo; correctly, the book and its blurb go on to misuse two apostrophes and a comma, as well as use circular logic to justify having written the book in the first place. <span class="quote-inline">&ldquo;The rise of a new generation is here&rdquo;</span> mixes metaphors nonsensically. I have no idea what this has to do with the blurry, extreme close-up of the barn owl. Is an AI creating these books?</p>
<h2>Half-a-rat: A Journey North</h2><p><span style="width: 260px; display: table"><span class="auto-content-inline"><a href="https://www.earthli.com/data/news/attachments/entry/4059/img_9503.jpeg"><img src="https://www.earthli.com/data/news/attachments/entry/4059/img_9503.jpeg" alt=" " style="width: 260px"></a></span><span class="auto-content-caption"><a href="https://www.earthli.com/data/news/attachments/entry/4059/img_9503.jpeg">Half-a-rat: A Journey North</a></span></span></p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Genetically enhanced animals survive with the aid of an AI on a post apocalyptic earth abandoned by humanity. Until the day the day humans return&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>Where to begin?</p>
<p>There&rsquo;s that threatening &ldquo;Volume 2&rdquo; that suggests that Volume 1 went so swimmingly that WC Quick was forced by fans to produce more literature. </p>
<p>There&rsquo;s the hand-drawn cover that looks like it was done in crayon. Is this the author flexing multiple skills? Or perhaps the author&rsquo;s offspring was asked to contribute? The dog in the front is more skillfully rendered than his companion or half-a-rat himself (herself?), who looks vaguely like a court jester but is clearly intended to be an emaciated astronaut who came from the space station floating in the background.</p>
<p>There&rsquo;s the run-on summary that omits a hyphen between &ldquo;post&rdquo; and &ldquo;apocalyptic&rdquo;, fails to capitalize &ldquo;earth&rdquo;—perhaps the author of <em>Lady from the Stars</em> could have helped—and makes a second sentence out of a dangling participle that repeats &ldquo;the day&rdquo; and omits a full stop.</p>
<p>A surfeit of choice.</p>
      </div>
      </div>
        <div class="footer">
    <div class="footer-data"><div class="footer-links"><ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/contact.php" title="">Contact</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/support.php" title="">Support</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/privacy.php" title="">Privacy</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/rights.php" title="">Rights</a></li></ul></div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="copyright">Copyright (c) 1999-2026 earthli.com. All Rights Reserved.</div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="versions">Powered by <ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore/app_news.php">earthli News 3.7</a></li><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore" title="">earthli WebCore&trade; 3.7</a></li></ul></div></div>    </div>
      </div>
  </div>  </body>
</html>
]]>
  </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
      <title type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[More great suggestions from Amazon]]>
  </title>
    <id>https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=4052</id>
    <link href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=4052"/>
    <updated>2020-09-18T20:56:54+02:00</updated>
    <author>
        <name type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[Marco von Ballmoos]]>
  </name>
      <uri>https://earthli.com/users/marco</uri>
    </author>
      <summary type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<h2>The Handsewer&rsquo;s Son</h2><p><span style="width: 170px; display: table"><span class="auto-content-inline"><a href="https://www.earthli.com/data/news/attachments/entry/4052/img_9344.jpeg"><img src="https://www.earthli.com/data/news/attachments/entry/4052/img_9344_tn.jpeg" alt=" " style="width: 170px"></a></span><span class="auto-content-caption"><a href="https://www.earthli.com/data/news/attachments/entry/4052/img_9344.jpeg">The Handsewer&#039;s Son</a></span></span></p>
<p>The blurb below the amazing cover is:</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Imagine having a gem in your hand that allows you to cut through the fabric of the universe. With a vision that can take you anyplace in the Galaxy.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>Amazon has had access to my wishlists for over a decade. Possibly even two decades.... [<a class="complete-text-link" href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=4052">More</a>]</p>
]]>
  </summary>
      <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<html lang="en">
  <head>
    <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/themes/ice.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/fonts/raleway.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/core/medium.css">
  </head>
  <body>
<div class="style-controls">  <div class="page">
    <div class="page-body">
<div class="info-box-top">
<p>
Published by <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_user.php?name=marco" title="Marco von Ballmoos" class="visible">marco</a> on <span class="date-time">18. Sep 2020 20:56:54 (GMT-5)</span>
</p>
</div>
      <div class="text-flow wide">
  <h2>The Handsewer&rsquo;s Son</h2><p><span style="width: 170px; display: table"><span class="auto-content-inline"><a href="https://www.earthli.com/data/news/attachments/entry/4052/img_9344.jpeg"><img src="https://www.earthli.com/data/news/attachments/entry/4052/img_9344_tn.jpeg" alt=" " style="width: 170px"></a></span><span class="auto-content-caption"><a href="https://www.earthli.com/data/news/attachments/entry/4052/img_9344.jpeg">The Handsewer&#039;s Son</a></span></span></p>
<p>The blurb below the amazing cover is:</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Imagine having a gem in your hand that allows you to cut through the fabric of the universe. With a vision that can take you anyplace in the Galaxy.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>Amazon has had access to my wishlists for over a decade. Possibly even two decades. They have names like &ldquo;Sociology and Philosophy&rdquo;, &ldquo;History and Biography&rdquo;, &ldquo;Science and Technology&rdquo;, and &ldquo;Public Policy&rdquo;. There is no &ldquo;self-published YA Fiction that is most likely utter shite even for the already low bar of the genre&rdquo;.</p>
<ul>
<li>What is a handsewer? Is that where the water from the washbasin goes?</li>
<li>Hooray: It&rsquo;s only Book <em>I</em>. There are more.</li>
<li>What does the second &ldquo;sentence&rdquo; refer to? The gem? Why is it separate from the first sentence?</li>
<li>Why not anywhere? Why the awkward anyplace?</li>
<li>Why is galaxy capitalized? Is the author German?</li>
<li>Why would anyone read this book?</li>
<li>The model looks like a twee clone of Cary Elwes from <em>The Princess Bride</em>. A gig&rsquo;s a gig, I guess.</li></ul>      </div>
      </div>
        <div class="footer">
    <div class="footer-data"><div class="footer-links"><ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/contact.php" title="">Contact</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/support.php" title="">Support</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/privacy.php" title="">Privacy</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/rights.php" title="">Rights</a></li></ul></div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="copyright">Copyright (c) 1999-2026 earthli.com. All Rights Reserved.</div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="versions">Powered by <ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore/app_news.php">earthli News 3.7</a></li><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore" title="">earthli WebCore&trade; 3.7</a></li></ul></div></div>    </div>
      </div>
  </div>  </body>
</html>
]]>
  </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
      <title type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[I Can't Breathe by Matt Taibbi (2017; read in 2020)]]>
  </title>
    <id>https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=4015</id>
    <link href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=4015"/>
    <updated>2020-06-22T21:28:28+02:00</updated>
    <author>
        <name type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[Marco von Ballmoos]]>
  </name>
      <uri>https://earthli.com/users/marco</uri>
    </author>
      <summary type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<blockquote class="quote abstract "><div>Disclaimer: these are notes I took while reading this book. They include citations I found interesting or enlightening or particularly well-written. In some cases, I&rsquo;ve pointed out which of these applies to which citation; in others, I have not. Any benefit you gain from reading these notes is... [<a class="complete-text-link" href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=4015">More</a>]</div></blockquote>]]>
  </summary>
      <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<html lang="en">
  <head>
    <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/themes/ice.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/fonts/raleway.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/core/medium.css">
  </head>
  <body>
<div class="style-controls">  <div class="page">
    <div class="page-body">
<div class="info-box-top">
<p>
Published by <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_user.php?name=marco" title="Marco von Ballmoos" class="visible">marco</a> on <span class="date-time">22. Jun 2020 21:28:28 (GMT-5)</span>
</p>
</div>
      <div class="text-flow wide">
  <blockquote class="quote abstract "><div>Disclaimer: these are notes I took while reading this book. They include citations I found interesting or enlightening or particularly well-written. In some cases, I&rsquo;ve pointed out which of these applies to which citation; in others, I have not. Any benefit you gain from reading these notes is purely incidental to the purpose they serve of reminding me what I once read. Please see Wikipedia for a summary if I&rsquo;ve failed to provide one sufficient for your purposes. If my notes serve to trigger an interest in this book, then I&rsquo;m happy for you.</div></blockquote><p>This book is an absolute tour-de-force of research and writing and empathy. The main thread of the story is the life and death of Eric Garner. He was born, lived, and died at an early age (43) in Staten Island, New York, in the U.S. He was killed by police for standing on a sidewalk. The story is much more complicated than that and Taibbi takes time to show all of the detail of how Garner ended up working on that corner, why he hadn&rsquo;t done anything wrong that day, and, perhaps most importantly, what brought the police to that location and put them in a killing mood.</p>
<p>The story is long and involves many features unique to the American landscape. Garner was basically doomed from day one, doomed from birth just by who his parents were and where they lived. He was doomed by his skin color and his imposing size. He was doomed by a society that inordinately feared people that looked like him—and dumped its frustrations on people like him. He was doomed by a society that could find no other way to <em>be</em> than to sacrifice 90% of its population to live in comparative squalor while 10% does quite well.</p>
<p>The police are the army that enforces the borders along these two intertwined societies, that makes sure that the extraction of wealth and energy continues, that the subjugated population stays in line. This situation affects people of all races—it happens a lot to poor Whites too—but people of color—and Blacks in particular—are singled out and massively overrepresented in all forms of statistics about crime.</p>
<p>In Taibbi&rsquo;s words,</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;[Garner] was, […] “just a man,” a single flawed person ground up by the power of the state. Eric Garner was murdered by history.</p>
<p>&ldquo;[…] The lengths we went to as a society to crush someone of such modest ambitions—Garner’s big dream was to someday sit down at work—were awesome to contemplate. What happened to Garner spoke to the increasing desperation of white America to avoid having to even see, much less speak to or live alongside, people like him.</p>
<p>&ldquo;[…] The motive was the secret sin of a divided society, a country frozen in time for more than fifty years, stopped one crucial step short of reconciliation and determined to stay there.&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote><p>That this is the case is a self-fulfilling prophecy: where the police look for crime, they find it. There are more than enough laws for them to always find something. The books have been filled with &ldquo;reasons&rdquo;; their job is to match those reasons to people in ways that aren&rsquo;t too obviously ridiculous. Even ridiculous generally goes unnoticed, except by the victims, whose opinions don&rsquo;t matter. If &ldquo;impeding government business&rdquo; by standing on a sidewalk is not only a ticketable offense, but an arrestable one, then all bets are off.</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Even in Tompkinsville Park, where 98 percent of everyone you met had less than a dollar or two, the police were everywhere.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>And the police go hunting nearly exclusively in Black and Latino neighborhoods in places like New York City. They &ldquo;toss&rdquo; people regularly for doing absolutely nothing—more than half a million stops per year, all to feed the Compstat numbers machine that determines who gets a promotion and who doesn&rsquo;t. But the police didn&rsquo;t invent the machine—they&rsquo;re kind of part of it, too. The upper-class people who matter, who run everything, set things up to keep the money and power funnels pouring in their direction.</p>
<p>As an officer Polanco describes it,</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;In one incident, he was forced to cuff a thirteen-year-old Mexican boy, with his superiors telling him they’d figure out the charge later. He even recounted being ordered to summons a guy for having no dog license when Polanco couldn’t even see a dog.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>What does &ldquo;toss&rdquo; mean? Often enough, it means a strip search in public, in the middle of the street, with a free genital and rectal exam conducted by apparently all-too-willing police officers.</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;They had a term for it: “socially raping.” Sometimes they’d yank a guy’s pants down in the precinct, but other times they’d do it in the open air, right on the sidewalk.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>&ldquo;But, wait?&rdquo;, you might ask. What about the Constitution? Don&rsquo;t people have rights? What about, specifically, the Fourth Amendment? Those things are not for the poor, not since the Supreme Court approved so-called Terry Stops, which reduced the requirement for a search to a constitutionally laughable level.</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The Terry decision essentially said that the legal standard for a whole generation of field searches would henceforth rest in the minds of police officers.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>At the time, people were 100% aware—in no small part due to the Kerner Commission of 1968—that racism and police brutality were the problems underlying inequality and subsequent &ldquo;unrest&rdquo;. But the Supreme Court punted on that too, basically saying that <span class="quote-inline">&ldquo;[w]e can’t do anything about racism or police brutality. But we can do something about crime.&rdquo;</span> And what was crime? Oh, we knew it when we saw it. And we knew where to look for it.</p>
<p>With this cudgel in hand, they went to work.</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;What they did have, they thought, was a tool that would help reduce crime. They weren’t sure if it would be abused or not. But they were pretty sure it would work.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>By “work”, they meant “keep poor people in check” by keeping them working, too tired to resist, not agitating, not bothering their betters. The policies prevented some crime by combatting it with other crime.</p>
<p>No other supposedly civilized country does this. Well, corporate crime is allowed, but directly preventing potential criminal acts by perpetrating constitutional crimes on the potential perps? I don’t think so. There is, essentially, carte blanche for the police themselves to commit the crimes they were charged with preventing, as long as they stick to prescribed victims.</p>
<p>To be clear they were <em>not</em> interested in stopping crime. The continuing lax attitude and nearly outright encouragement of white-collar crime—the more you steal, the more likely you are to get a Cabinet position—makes that very clear. Nor were they interested in even collaring the poor people responsible for the actual crimes that they&rsquo;d even bothered to put on the books as the ones they claimed to be enforcing.</p>
<p>The crimes that affect the most lives, that are the most violent in terms of destroying lives and entire generations, are actively encouraged as part of the system that makes the right people rich. Taibbi describes the scams run by Eastern Service, a real-estate company that, in 1968, introduced practices that would be emulated several times over the next decades, culminating in the breathtaking destruction of Black wealth in 2008, when the financial crisis wiped out 70% of Black wealth.</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;Federal prosecutors estimated that in 1968 alone, companies like the Eastern Service operation created $100 million in defaults and more than five thousand empty houses in New York City alone.</p>
<p>&ldquo;[…] There was no direct bribery element in 2008, but everything else was more or less exactly the same: wholesale falsification of financial records, the aggressive effort to get people with poor credit histories into homes, falsified employment data, inflated appraisals, etc.</p>
<p>&ldquo;[…] From forty acres and a mule to the Great Society to subprime, it was the same swindle, over and over and over again: promises that turned into brutal obligations that turned into life-ruining debt and neighborhood-destroying foreclosures for some and massive windfall profits for others.&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote><p>This is where the racism is undeniable—unless you have a vested interest in denying it. I.e. you&rsquo;re already in the 10% or you think that you are or you dream one day of being in it or you&rsquo;re just a deluded suck-up to authority.</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;This disparity echoed an earlier bizarre statistic showing that 90 to 95 percent of all people imprisoned for drug offenses in New York in the nineties were black and Hispanic, despite studies showing that 72 percent of all illegal drug users in the city were white. Clearly a certain form of discretion was being exercised.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>The result of all of these penny-ante arrests was to not only get the individual police the numbers they needed to advance their careers, but also to ruin the rest of those people&rsquo;s lives. Once you&rsquo;ve got an arrest record, the supposed largess of society is no longer available. And guess whose fault that is? Why it&rsquo;s your very own fault, isn&rsquo;t it?</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;And thanks to the drug war, huge numbers of young men came home from prison sentences unable to vote, live in public housing, or obtain licenses to be barbers, pet shop owners, even sanitation workers. They were kept under constant surveillance, watched even when they urinated for parole officers.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>So the objective wasn&rsquo;t to catch criminals. It was to produce criminals out of the parts of the population considered to be unsavory by their betters. <span class="quote-inline">&ldquo;The objective was order, an inherently ambiguous term but a condition that people in a given community recognized when they saw it.&rdquo;</span></p>
<p>Translation? No poor or black people in sight were to sully the view of anyone important (generally, the top 10%). It&rsquo;s why Eric Garner was no longer allowed to stand on his sordid, sad corner in that sordid, sad park in sordid, sad Staten Island and sell cigarettes for $0.50 apiece. Across the street, important people had paid money to build an apartment complex for other important people. And no-one wanted to see a shambolic black man every day. He had to go.</p>
<p>Even when New York City settled a civil lawsuit about Stop and Frisk, they just kept doing it, exploiting a gaping loophole in the settlement language to simply <em>prohibit</em> and then <em>report</em> on the now-drastically increased harassment instead of stopping it.</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;That they didn’t stop mass violating the constitutional rights of 50 percent of the city’s population was, sadly enough, immaterial. The city hadn’t actually promised to change, as far as Judge Scheindlin saw it. They’d merely promised to write a new policy prohibiting the wrong behavior and turn over some numbers.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>Taibbi cites case after case to bolster his point, even finding a case from the 70s in Arkansas when Bill Clinton was DA where police officers stopped a black family for a bullshit ticket, fined them $25, then didn&rsquo;t trust them to pay it if billed. So they forced the family to drive to the precinct where they had to pay in cash, immediately. The father had the gall to ask for a receipt and the ticketing officer rewarded him by shooting him point-blank in the face in the middle of the precinct. That case didn&rsquo;t make it past the grand jury.</p>
<p>Neither did Eric Garner&rsquo;s case, even though there were eight minutes of video showing police officers attacking a man out of the blue, a man who didn&rsquo;t defend himself, pulling him to the ground and killing him with an illegal chokehold. Most of the eight-minute video is of Garner lying prone on the street while officers mill around, joking amongst themselves before someone thinks to call an ambulance. Garner&rsquo;s last words were &ldquo;I can&rsquo;t breathe.&rdquo;</p>
<p>Even in cases like Garner&rsquo;s, where there is video, the top 10% are more than happy to accept that the video isn&rsquo;t <em>real</em> evidence because a <em>known criminal</em> made it on his dirty, criminal phone. They don&rsquo;t claim that it&rsquo;s faked, only that it doesn&rsquo;t matter because the wrong kind of person made it. </p>
<p>By that logic, though, if two cops filmed each other committing a crime, then their subsequent criminal culpability would automatically disqualify the video they each took, exonerating each of them. Two videos of crimes. No criminals. A paradox because the criminal act disqualifies the filmer as a witness forever. It makes no sense, but it doesn&rsquo;t have to in order to be effective. People generally don&rsquo;t care about holes in logic big enough to drive a truck through if you&rsquo;re telling them what they want to hear.</p>
<p>Those are just some of the details in this book. Taibbi goes deep into the numbers machine as well as the incestuous relationship between politicians and the police. He details the Orwellian laws for police that are completely different than those for mere mortals. He describes the labyrinth of the disciplinary process for police, what a black hole it is, from which no accusation can possible escape. As he puts it, the review board <span class="quote-inline">&ldquo;is where citizen complaints go to die.&rdquo;</span></p>
<p>He discusses the common police practice of planting evidence, of lying on arrest reports, of lying on the witness stand, of brutality and humiliation, of &ldquo;teaching lessons&rdquo; to &ldquo;those animals&rdquo;. The police are at war with the poor, plain and simple. They have been given this job by the rich. Black are massively disproportionately harmed and beaten down by this system.</p>
<p>Though the statistics would support it, Taibbi does not even bother to explain that white people are kept down by the man, too. He does not bother to discuss that, in absolute numbers, more white people are killed by police than black people. This is all true, but there is no way to focus on any of this once you realize the disgusting, shocking level of racism in the ruling class and its private army, the police.</p>
<p>Taibbi makes the case what so many who&rsquo;ve been involved in the fight for justice for many years have known for decades: there is a deep animus against Blacks that drives people absolutely crazy. It makes them fly off the handle in ways that they absolutely do not do when dealing with &ldquo;their own kind&rdquo;.</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Try to imagine a world where there isn’t a vast unspoken consensus that black men are inherently scary, and most of these police assaults would play in the media like spontaneous attacks of madness. Instead, they’re sold as battle scenes from an occupation story, where a quick trigger finger while patrolling the planet of a violent alien race is easy to understand.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>It&rsquo;s absolutely clear that many people still just <em>hate</em> Blacks for being black and want nothing to do with them, other than to perhaps continue to benefit from them as a source of cheap labor. Which they do very successfully, with the massive so-called justice system set up to funnel them into jail or prison—they have to have an arrest record—after which you can deny them public housing, jobs, anything. Then you can bleed them for their cheap or free labor while in jail—or while working a bullshit job that their employer knows they can&rsquo;t quit.</p>
<p>The stories Taibbi tells about Garner in this regard are infuriating, with the system and the police just bleeding him dry. Killing him slowly. Torturing him. The police use him for arrest numbers, for their own careers, because they sure as fuck don’t care about cigarette taxes. They often confiscated his money using &ldquo;asset foreiture&rdquo;—another concept unique to America where police can just take your stuff pretty much whenever it strikes their fancy (and good luck getting it back).</p>
<p>It&rsquo;s a tremendous waste of time, money, and it&rsquo;s utterly immoral, to boot. It costs the city nothing to make the charge and it ties up the poor bastard charged for years. Then it churns its way through the conveyor belt of the courts, which rarely drop cases, regardless of how outrageously unsubstantiated they are.</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;It was a textbook case of what police and lawyers both call “test-a-lying.” A police officer will come into court at a probable cause hearing, for instance, and a judge will ask him why he pulled over so-and-so’s car. The officer will respond in a deadpan: “I saw drugs lying on the center console of his vehicle.” Defense lawyers laugh about the omnipresent “center console” detail in arrest warrants.</p>
<p>&ldquo;The drugs in reality will turn out to have been found in a jacket pocket, or under the seat, after an illegal fishing expedition. But the police will tell it in court another way. Particularly in misdemeanors and drug cases, cases without profile, judges routinely buy these dubious bits of testimony and let dirty cases move through the system.</p>
<p>&ldquo;[…] Judges rarely throw out police testimony, and even when they do, actual charges of perjury against a police officer are rare.&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote><p>But police cases are different. Those are slowed down, dragged out over years.</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;From the first knock on the door, family members find themselves facing a series of intractable bureaucracies designed to make cases against police officers vanish in blizzards of political excuses and unintelligible legalese.</p>
<p>&ldquo;[…] These bureaucracies are designed to frustrate and exhaust families bent on getting justice, grinding them down over time until finally they become dispirited and give up. The quest for answers becomes a war of attrition, and the state almost always wins.</p>
<p>&ldquo;[…] In these cases, obscure exceptions and precedents are constantly unearthed to narrow the field of culpability to a vanishing point.</p>
<p>&ldquo;[…] while the cases often begin as unplanned murders and assaults committed in heat-of-the-moment situations by working-class cops, they end as carefully orchestrated cover-ups committed in cold blood, through the more ethereal, polished, institutional racism of politicians, judges, and attorneys.</p>
<p>&ldquo;[…] Both the city and Pantaleo appealed, however, and the case was tied up in court for another year and a half. By the summer of 2016, both sides were still months away from making oral arguments in the case. Years of pitched legal battle over a single number. Even the release of that much information was too much for the city to bear.&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote><p>This is how they waste taxpayer money defending criminals and flouting justice, funneling all the attacker&rsquo;s energy into an ever-more narrowly defined and ultimately useless endeavor. You want justice for a murder, but you end up losing in court two years later trying to get a single number that probably signifies nothing legally relevant. You end up dying on an insignificant hill that your enemy chose.</p>
<p>It would be a tragedy, but we know at least some good comes of it: it&rsquo;s done in the name of generating careers and economic activity for the already privileged to the detriment of people who aren&rsquo;t really people. Let&rsquo;s face it: they brought it on themselves by not having been born privileged. There is no way out of this—the system has been well-designed to trap more than enough of the wrong kind of people within it. And it&rsquo;s well-designed to make those trapped feel like it&rsquo;s their own fault, to constantly remind them that they are being <em>helped</em>, even when the help is there to maintain their poor position, not to lift them out.</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The Great Society programs that came out of that War on Poverty set into motion a series of unintended consequences. The assistance programs always had a strong bureaucratic and even punitive element. The government created armies of inspectors and social workers who, in the process of administering public assistance, got involved in regulating every aspect of life in poor black neighborhoods.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>This is paternalism. Because you can’t just give someone 500 bucks a month. You have to remind them that they needed it. And, of course, let them know that they’re in charge of remedying the deficiency that led them to needing it, which was always inherent to them and not immanent to the system.</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Black America always saw the continuing schism. But white America has traditionally been free to ignore and be untroubled by it and to believe it had reached the “postracial” stage of its otherwise proud history […] in the end mostly what people in power wanted to do was nothing at all, unless there was an immediate benefit in it for them.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><h2>Citations</h2><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;For Pedro, the new regime just put an official government stamp on neighborhood rules that he&rsquo;d understood since his earliest childhood days. The streets may seem free and public, but they don&rsquo;t belong to you. You walk down them at someone else&rsquo;s pleasure, with someone else&rsquo;s permission.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 28</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;"If a guy screwed up, they made it right,&ldquo; Serrano says. &ldquo;He&rsquo;d say, &lsquo;Oh, I found this gun in a trunk.&rsquo; And they&rsquo;d say, &lsquo;You&rsquo;re not supposed to search the trunk. But don&rsquo;t worry about it, kid. You found it in the backseat. And you saw the tip of the gun on the passenger side. It was right near you, remember? Okay, write it down. Now you&rsquo;re okay, guy.&lsquo; &ldquo;&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 29</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;[…] up in the northwest Bronx, a tough neighborhood that included &ldquo;hot spots&rdquo; like Bedford Park—were not just stopping people at random but strip-searching them. They had a term for it: &ldquo;socially raping.&rdquo; Sometimes they&rsquo;d yank a guy&rsquo;s pants down in the precinct, but other times they&rsquo;d do it in the open air, right on the sidewalk.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 29</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Just like Serrano, Polanco had been put in the position of writing up innocent people. In one incident, he was forced to cuff a thirteen-year-old Mexican boy, with his superiors telling him they&rsquo;d figure out the charge later. He even recounted being ordered to summons a guy for having no dog license when Polanco couldn&rsquo;t even see a dog.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 33</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;In jail, he spent a lot of time reading. He read that states in the Cuomo years earned matching funds and other incentives from the federal government if they committed enough resources to catching crack dealers. That explained why cops spent so much of their time and resources watching black people trade a few dollars of this for that. &ldquo;Otherwise, nobody gives a fuck what goes on in our neighborhoods,&rdquo; he says.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 38</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Even in Tompkinsville Park, where 98 percent of everyone you met had less than a dollar or two, the police were everywhere&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 38</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;While the federal government in the infamous Tuskegee Study in rural Alabama was leaving black men with syphilis untreated, researchers at Holmesburg were paying inmates to allow them to perform tests and biopsies on patches of their skin. The studies were for developing skin creams, deodorants, moisturizers, suntan products, and other substances. This was the 1970s.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 42</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;By early 2011, the Poospatuck Reservation, located just south of the Montauk Highway in the middle of Long Island, was taking delivery of about 6.6 million cartons per year, which worked out to be about two-thirds as much as the 10 million legally sold cartons in New York State. The Poospatucks only had a tax exemption to sell to other tribe members, of which there were about three hundred. That meant millions of people a year were thumbing their nose at Bloomberg&rsquo;s revenue plan.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 48</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;New York&rsquo;s then governor Mario Cuomo spent the eighties and early nineties funding more than thirty new prisons using a loophole in an urban development law that, perversely, had been intended to create jobs in inner cities.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 49</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The Supreme Court of Earl Warren had become known for expanding civil liberties and curtailing police power, for instance by ending the &ldquo;third degree&rdquo;—a euphemism for torture as an interrogation tactic—and forbidding the use of illegally seized evidence, in the 1961 case Mapp v. Ohio. But now, as some Americans were beginning to panic over a perception of massive urban unrest, the court reversed course and gave the police a new weapon. They ruled McFadden&rsquo;s arrest had been a good one and thereby created a new legal framework for police interactions with people on the street. <strong>The Terry decision essentially said that the legal standard for a whole generation of field searches would henceforth rest in the minds of police officers.</strong>&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 55</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;Translated loosely, what Warren was saying was that even if all of those complaining black people are right about police abuse, my Supreme Court lacks the power to do anything about it. It&rsquo;s going to happen no matter what. However, he wrote, while helpless to stop police abuse, we do have the power to make fighting crime easier. Therefore, Warren suggested, we will worry about one and not the other.</p>
<p>&ldquo;<strong>We can&rsquo;t do anything about racism or police brutality. But we can do something about crime.</strong>&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 55</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;"For centuries, the role of the police as watchmen was judged primarily not in terms of its compliance with appropriate procedures but rather in terms of its attaining a desired objective,&ldquo; they wrote. &ldquo;The objective was order, an inherently ambiguous term but a condition that people in a given community recognized when they saw it.&rdquo;&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 58</div></div><p>Which translated to: no poor or black people in sight.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;&ldquo;We can offer no wholly satisfactory answer to this important question,&rdquo; they wrote. &ldquo;We are not confident that there is a satisfactory answer except to hope that by their selection, training, and supervision, the police will be inculcated with a clear sense of the outer limit of their discretionary authority.&rdquo;&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 60</div></div><p>Oh sweet God, the naiveté. Power corrupts . Absolute power corrupts absolutely.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;What they did have, they thought, was a tool that would help reduce crime. They weren&rsquo;t sure if it would be abused or not. But they were pretty sure it would work.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 60</div></div><p>By &ldquo;work&rdquo;, they meant &ldquo;keep poor people in check&rdquo;,  to keep them working, not resisting, not agitating, not bothering their betters. It prevented some crime by combatting it with other crime. No other supposedly civilized country does this. Well, corporate crime is allowed, but directly preventing potential criminal acts by perpetrating constitutional crimes on the potential perps? I don&rsquo;t think so. Essentially carte blanche for the police themselves to commit the crimes they were charged with preventing, as long as they stuck to prescribed victims.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;"People frightened of crime,&ldquo; he said, &ldquo;are already victims.&rdquo;&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 61</div></div><p>Christ thats horseshit…not if the fear is unreasonable. Someone afraid of black people should not be called a victim.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;There was no other way to explain it: New York&rsquo;s reputation as a &ldquo;scary&rdquo; city was inextricably linked to the perception that it was a black city, or at least a place where white people couldn&rsquo;t safely avoid having to deal with black people.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 63</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Moreover, &ldquo;zero tolerance&rdquo; implied police were arresting everyone everywhere by the book, without making their own judgment calls, which was certainly not the case. Cops were not throwing zero tolerance at stockbrokers in high-rent neighborhoods. It was discretion here, no discretion there.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 68</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;This disparity echoed an earlier bizarre statistic showing that 90 to 95 percent of all people imprisoned for drug offenses in New York in the nineties were black and Hispanic, despite studies showing that 72 percent of all illegal drug users in the city were white. Clearly a certain form of discretion was being exercised.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 68</div></div><p>Again, not fighting crime, but inventing criminals.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The legal word for this is &ldquo;forfeiture,&rdquo; but Garner just called it &ldquo;taking my shit.&rdquo; Police take anything they turn up in a search that they think is contraband, i.e., the proceeds of an illegal activity, like for instance gambling or drug dealing or selling untaxed cigarettes. Police might stop your car or stop you on the street, and it didn&rsquo;t matter what you said, they&rsquo;d find a way to go through your stuff. You waited while they went through your pockets. If they found a wad of cash or a carton of smokes, they might just take it and dare you to come to the station and prove where it came from. Even when they&rsquo;re wrong, the tactic never really backs up on the police.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 76</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Whole days spent standing in the snow on his swollen feet handing fifty-cent cigarettes to drunks would disappear in an instant, thanks to chance meetings with snickering cops who always had a little extra word for him, too.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 77</div></div><p>And they kept the money either for themselves or the department.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;That they didn&rsquo;t stop mass violating the constitutional rights of 50 percent of the city&rsquo;s population was, sadly enough, immaterial. The city hadn&rsquo;t actually promised to change, as far as Judge Scheindlin saw it. They&rsquo;d merely promised to write a new policy prohibiting the wrong behavior and turn over some numbers.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 84</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;In other words, in a court, before a judge, the city essentially now argued that they had falsified millions of Stop-and-Frisk forms. All of those reasons justifying the searches that the city&rsquo;s cops had cited on official forms countless times—&rdquo;furtive movements,&ldquo; &ldquo;bulges,&rdquo; &ldquo;inappropriate attire,&rdquo; etc.—were just convenient euphemisms. In truth, there was a single, blanket justification that covered &ldquo;reasonable suspicion&rdquo; for at least 80 percent of those searches: they were black or Hispanic residents of high-crime neighborhoods.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 85</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The neighborhoods at which Ray Kelly and Michael Bloomberg pointed were not just a statistical location for criminal acts. They were crimes themselves. Most of the crime-ridden minority neighborhoods in New York City, especially areas like East New York, where many of the characters in Eric Garner&rsquo;s story grew up, had been artificially created by a series of criminal real estate scams.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 86</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The scale of these scams was, for the times, massive. Federal prosecutors estimated that in 1968 alone, companies like the Eastern Service operation created $100 million in defaults and more than five thousand empty houses in New York City alone.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 87</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;There was no direct bribery element in 2008, but everything else was more or less exactly the same: wholesale falsification of financial records, the aggressive effort to get people with poor credit histories into homes, falsified employment data, inflated appraisals, etc.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 88</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;From forty acres and a mule to the Great Society to subprime, it was the same swindle, over and over and over again: promises that turned into brutal obligations that turned into life-ruining debt and neighborhood-destroying foreclosures for some and massive windfall profits for others.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 88</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Things like this are part of what drive the resentment toward police in nonwhite neighborhoods. For the most part, people living in low-income housing and in project towers don&rsquo;t see the more egregious double standard in the justice system enjoyed by, say, Wall Street CEOs committing massive real estate scams that decimated neighborhoods. But you do notice that your landlord is getting away with decades of violations without consequence.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 88</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Rules were all he wanted. Everyone knew that the government didn&rsquo;t care about the law; if it did, Jewel&rsquo;s landlord wouldn&rsquo;t be free to run his business in open violation of dozens of building codes. If the law mattered, cops wouldn&rsquo;t be stopping and frisking hundreds of thousands of people every year in violation of the law. Eric knew that the city didn&rsquo;t run according to the law but according to the unwritten rules. But those rules needed to be followed or there was no way for a person to live.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 90</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;On the afternoon of March 28, 2014, he was walking out of the check-cashing storefront on the corner of Bay and Victory when police stopped him. They asked him where he was going and asked for ID. Garner protested that he didn&rsquo;t have any ID on him. They asked where his ID was. &ldquo;It&rsquo;s in my car,&rdquo; he said. &ldquo;Let&rsquo;s go to your car,&rdquo; they told him. He went with the police to his car, which was parked around the corner. While he looked for his wallet, police took the opportunity to search inside the car. They found a carton of untaxed cigarettes and arrested him on the spot.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 95</div></div><p>Infuriating. Just bleeding him dry. Killing him slowly. Torturing him. Using him for arrest numbers, for their own careers, because they sure as fuck don&rsquo;t care about cigarette taxes.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Thomas reportedly tested negative when they checked his system for drugs. He couldn&rsquo;t have swallowed anything. And if he never had an open container, then basically it was just one more stop gone wrong, a beating in broad daylight over nothing. But the police didn&rsquo;t fold their hand. They followed the usual playbook and charged Thomas with obstructing government administration and resisting arrest. &ldquo;The police are like a gang,&rdquo; Thomas said at the time.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 105</div></div><p>A tremendous waste of time, money, and its utterly immoral to boot. It costs them nothing to make the charge and it ties up the poor bastard for years.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;It was a textbook case of what police and lawyers both call &ldquo;test-a-lying.&rdquo; A police officer will come into court at a probable cause hearing, for instance, and a judge will ask him why he pulled over so-and-so&rsquo;s car. The officer will respond in a deadpan: &ldquo;I saw drugs lying on the center console of his vehicle.&rdquo; Defense lawyers laugh about the omnipresent &ldquo;center console&rdquo; detail in arrest warrants. The drugs in reality will turn out to have been found in a jacket pocket, or under the seat, after an illegal fishing expedition. But the police will tell it in court another way. Particularly in misdemeanors and drug cases, cases without profile, judges routinely buy these dubious bits of testimony and let dirty cases move through the system.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 105</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Judges rarely throw out police testimony, and even when they do, actual charges of perjury against a police officer are rare. That doesn&rsquo;t mean that all or even most police are dirty. It just means that in places like Staten Island there&rsquo;s little downside for police to cutting corners on arrest warrants and searches. If instead of waiting to see an actual crime committed, you want to just grab a guy off the street and shake him to see what comes out of his pockets, there&rsquo;s a very good chance that it won&rsquo;t stop your case from moving forward.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 106</div></div><p>Costs them nothing. No downside. Especially when you&rsquo;re doing it to subhumans.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;He remembered being in Brownsville in the early nineties, watching police checking people outside an old folks&rsquo; home for open container violations. The sight of young white police smugly manhandling and questioning gray-haired black folks about their beverages left James openmouthed. &ldquo;You&rsquo;re talking to an eighty-five-year-old lady for carrying a can of something, not even beer. This is an older person, who&rsquo;s lived through things, someone you should have respect for,&rdquo; he says. &ldquo;Would you ever see that go on at an elderly home in a white neighborhood?&rdquo;&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 116</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;To the black people who were its most frequent targets, the real-life, nontheoretical version of the program instantly evoked overtly racist policing programs from the past. For them, Broken Windows and Stop-and-Frisk never had a chance of being taken seriously as anything but the latest excuse to harass minorities.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 116</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;No matter what the time period, police from the Civil War through the later Jim Crow period always had series of highly flexible laws ready if they felt the need to arrest any black person uncooperative enough not to have committed an actual crime.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 117</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The Black Codes were transparently designed as a ready-made legal excuse to act in any situation when black people started to get too comfortable exercising their basic rights in the presence of white people.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 117</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The Great Society programs that came out of that War on Poverty set into motion a series of unintended consequences. The assistance programs always had a strong bureaucratic and even punitive element. The government created armies of inspectors and social workers who, in the process of administering public assistance, got involved in regulating every aspect of life in poor black neighborhoods.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 117</div></div><p>Paternalism. Because you can&rsquo;t just give someone 500 bucks a month. You have to remind them that they needed it. And, of course, let them know that they&rsquo;re in charge of remedying the deficiency that led them to needing it, which was always inherent to them and not immanent to the system.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;This regulation became even more intrusive when the Supreme Court in the seventies gave the state a permanent right to enter any home of anyone on public assistance. Even sexual freedom wasn&rsquo;t absolute. Housing inspectors asked single mothers who their boyfriends were, and how many nights a week they slept over, to ensure that the women were eligible for the aid they received. No other form of government aid—from corporate welfare to agricultural subsidies to the mortgage interest deduction—required this level of intimate intrusion.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 117</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;And thanks to the drug war, huge numbers of young men came home from prison sentences unable to vote, live in public housing, or obtain licenses to be barbers, pet shop owners, even sanitation workers. They were kept under constant surveillance, watched even when they urinated for parole officers.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 118</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Absent the cellphone videos, in other words, nobody would likely have heard how Eric Garner really died. This would have been written up as an unhealthy man with asthma and diabetes who had a heart attack after a routine arrest on a minor charge.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 127</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;From the first knock on the door, family members find themselves facing a series of intractable bureaucracies designed to make cases against police officers vanish in blizzards of political excuses and unintelligible legalese.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 136</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;These bureaucracies are designed to frustrate and exhaust families bent on getting justice, grinding them down over time until finally they become dispirited and give up. The quest for answers becomes a war of attrition, and the state almost always wins. The families eventually give in and soon everything is forgotten, allowing the process to repeat itself.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 136</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;In these cases, obscure exceptions and precedents are constantly unearthed to narrow the field of culpability to a vanishing point. Often, in the end, the law says that not only is no one responsible for the death of someone killed by a police officer, no one can be responsible.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 140</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Another recurring theme in these stories is that while the cases often begin as unplanned murders and assaults committed in heat-of-the-moment situations by working-class cops, they end as carefully orchestrated cover-ups committed in cold blood, through the more ethereal, polished, institutional racism of politicians, judges, and attorneys.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 140</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;There was a flip side to the argument. What if the practical truth is that real justice in white America is a loser&rsquo;s pursuit—and maybe money is the only consolation on offer for these families who&rsquo;d lost their loved ones? If systemic change and true justice are nonstarters, is it wrong to focus on getting the families as much money as possible? Some civil rights lawyers reluctantly admit that these thoughts enter their minds.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 149</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The relatively simple ask from black Americans was that white Americans take a moment to recognize what it feels like, say, to be told your son has been killed, but not told why or how, as happened with Trayvon Martin, or to watch a pregnant woman put in a chokehold over a backyard barbecue, as happened to twenty-seven-year-old Rosan Miller in New York nine days after Garner&rsquo;s death. They asked white people to consider what it felt like to have your son&rsquo;s bleeding corpse left in the street for four long hours. But the request implicit in the name &ldquo;Black Lives Matter&rdquo; quickly flipped around into an absurd overreaction.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 153</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;From Powell to Sayon to Garner, from Hogan to Murphy to Donovan, very little in these stories ever changed, except for the names.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 171</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Sharpton would later try to fight back, reportedly telling young members at an NAN gathering that new activist groups trying to drive a wedge between protesters and the old guard were &ldquo;pimping&rdquo; young people. &ldquo;It&rsquo;s the disconnect that is the strategy to break the movement,&rdquo; Sharpton said, according to Capital New York reporter Azi Paybarah, who obtained a recording of the meeting. On tape, the reverend goes on: &ldquo;They play on your ego. &lsquo;Oh, you young and hip, you&rsquo;re full of fire. You&rsquo;re the new face.&lsquo; All the stuff that they know will titillate your ears. That&rsquo;s what a pimp says to a ho.&rdquo;&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 175</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Aspects of the old protest model have been romanticized over time, leading to the sometimes-embarrassing phenomenon of well-off college graduates bragging about getting arrested and confronting &ldquo;the man,&rdquo; usually a line cop who will work his whole life and still owe money on a starter house in some dreary suburb somewhere.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 178</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;On one side sat a group of mostly nonwhite Americans who believed (or knew from personal experience) that institutional racism is still a deathly serious problem in this country, as evidenced by everything from profiling to mass incarceration to sentencing disparities to a massive wealth gap. On the other side sat an increasingly impatient population of white conservatives that was being squeezed economically (although not nearly as much as black citizens), felt its cultural primacy eroding, and had become hypersensitive to any accusation of racism.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 189</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Trooper Green ostensibly stopped Carnell for speeding, although the real offense may have just been driving too nice a car. He didn&rsquo;t trust the man to pay his fine later, so he demanded that Carnell drive into Star City and pay a &ldquo;bond&rdquo; on the spot.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 202</div></div><p>None of this is legal.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Inside the courthouse, Russ paid the money, then made what proved to be a fatal mistake. He asked for a receipt.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 202</div></div><p>He assumed he was a citizen.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;"Your husband said a smart word,&ldquo; is how Green explained Carnell&rsquo;s death.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 203</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Once again, an all-white jury was seated. The jury took three hours this time instead of eight minutes. They found Ratliff and Green innocent.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 204</div></div><p>This makes me nearly physically ill.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;After this change, the federal government for the first time openly claimed purview over local criminal cases. It asserted its right to step in and reprosecute if state or city governments were too backward or corrupt to do it themselves. Star City, Arkansas, became the birthplace of the modern federal civil rights investigation.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 205</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;So here he was again in another shabby provincial courtroom where the fix was probably in, awaiting the inevitable disingenuous ending that is a consistent feature of these cases: the moment when a judge or a prosecutor sighs and tells the family that the law says there&rsquo;s nothing they can do.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 208</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Meyerson wasn&rsquo;t accusing him of being biased, just saying that lots of people in Staten Island might think he was simply because he was part of what was perceived to be a racist county&rsquo;s racist system of justice. Meyerson&rsquo;s argument was that for the African American community to be satisfied in this particular case, they needed a different judge, which made perfect sense and really had nothing to do with Garnett personally.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 218</div></div><p>Essentially drawing a line from 1970s Arkansas and 2014 Staten Island.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;Meyerson wouldn&rsquo;t let go. He pushed Garnett some more and reiterated that the case was not about fine legal abstractions but about brutal, obvious reality. He argued that if the case had been about a white man choked to death by a black man over a cigarette while the black man&rsquo;s friends watched and did nothing, the killer would have been indicted long ago.</p>
<p>&ldquo;&ldquo;That African American and probably his friends would have been arrested,&rdquo; Meyerson thundered. &ldquo;And in the proverbial New York minute, the prosecutor would have convened the grand jury, and in half a day, with the videotape, with the medical examiner&rsquo;s report, and with some report saying chokeholds cause people to die, and the audio saying, &lsquo;I can&rsquo;t breathe,&lsquo; would have gotten indictments for some form of homicide.&rdquo;&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 218</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;And a federal judge ruled that the NAACP had standing to sue in that nearly exact case because the state had indeed failed, and the NAACP, an organization founded for the exact purpose of defending African Americans against being lynched, or shot between the eyes over a speeding ticket, or strangled over a cigarette, had a clear interest in securing the civil rights of its clients.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 219</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Those last three words, &ldquo;of no moment,&rdquo; hung poisonously in the air. It was the age-old argument: we don&rsquo;t need outsiders coming in to tell us our business. The argument was as old as America, a country where southern white resentment over anyone telling them how to deal with &ldquo;their&rdquo; blacks was written into the Constitution.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 221</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Daniel Pantaleo had done such duty in Staten Island. Project residents in New York for the most part deeply resented these searches. The idea of having to bring ID with you to empty trash pissed people off. Even worse was the notion of having to deal with police patrols in what most people considered their own hallways.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 222</div></div><p>Flabbergasted. Presumably this is allowed because it&rsquo;s public housing and they&rsquo;d long since passed a law that poor people have no rights when housed on public land. Second-class because you&rsquo;re poor.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Ultimately the cops got angry and arrested Fields for the catchall offenses of &ldquo;obstructing pedestrian traffic&rdquo; and &ldquo;obstructing government administration.&rdquo; They claimed, among other things, that the skinny young man had prevented people from entering the elevator.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 222</div></div><p>Arrested for contempt of cop or having a smart mouth.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;This to him was only a dangerous place, not a place where people raised kids, fell in love, watched Giants games, told bad jokes, and ate Christmas dinners. People who lived there had no identity for him apart from the fact that they were potential threats.</p>
<p>&ldquo;A cop ascending a staircase in a white neighborhood who was so pre-terrified of the residents that he pulled the trigger at the first sound he heard would be derided as a paranoid lunatic.</p>
<p>&ldquo;Similarly, the idea that a fat white guy selling hot smokes on a street corner was a grave threat would be laughed at as absurd. But a 350-pound black man is plausibly described in the press as someone who scared pedestrians, a threat needing to be defused.&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 224</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Try to imagine a world where there isn&rsquo;t a vast unspoken consensus that black men are inherently scary, and most of these police assaults would play in the media like spontaneous attacks of madness. Instead, they&rsquo;re sold as battle scenes from an occupation story, where a quick trigger finger while patrolling the planet of a violent alien race is easy to understand.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 225</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;In nearly half a century of litigating police abuse cases, Meyerson had become fixated on the idea that the law was becoming a thing too much of itself, self-deceiving and disentangled from morality.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 227</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;It was a humdrum case of test-a-lying and fishing with dynamite: stop a whole car, fudge the probable cause, violate a right or two or three, charge everyone, let the courts sort it out.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 230</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The NYPD ultimately had to pay out $30,000, or $15,000 for each man strip-searched.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 231</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;what was it with cops and cavity searches?&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 238</div></div><p>Seriously. This is the strongest indication of sociopathy. Who does this willingly? with such seeming gusto? Monsters. An intelligent person doesn&rsquo;t jump into this sort of thing without inhibition. They&rsquo;re like stormtroopers.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Even before de Blasio took office, police were already claiming that Stop-and-Frisk was a thing of the past. Among other things, they insisted that stops had declined 94 percent by the last three months of Michael Bloomberg&rsquo;s administration.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 239</div></div><p>How does it drop that much if they weren&rsquo;t useless and just harassment in the first place?</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Both the city and Pantaleo appealed, however, and the case was tied up in court for another year and a half. By the summer of 2016, both sides were still months away from making oral arguments in the case. Years of pitched legal battle over a single number. Even the release of that much information was too much for the city to bear.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 242</div></div><p>This is how they waste taxpayer money defending criminals and flouting justice, funneling all the attacker&rsquo;s energy into an ever-more narrowly defined and ultimately useless endeavor. You want justice for a murder, but you end up losing in court two years later trying to get a single number that probably signifies nothing legally relevant. You end up dying on an insignificant hill that your enemy chose.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The FOIA request leading to the release of the video was clearly a major reason that Van Dyke was charged with murder at all. Law enforcement had lied repeatedly in that case, claiming an assault that never happened. It was only when it couldn&rsquo;t be denied anymore that charges were filed.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 247</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;"Back then they had masks,&ldquo; he said. &ldquo;Now they have uniforms. Then they hid behind the masks. Now they hide behind the uniforms. We know their faces, but we don&rsquo;t know nothing else.&rdquo;&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 249</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The police, however, made it absolutely clear that they saw a connection between Orta&rsquo;s criminality and the fact that he&rsquo;d taken the film, and they were determined to have the rest of the world make that same connection.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 255</div></div><p>Thought experiment: if two cops film each other committing a crime, then each of their crikminal culpability would automatically disqualify the video they took, exonerating each of them. Two videos of crimes. No criminals. A paradox because the criminal act disqualifies the filmer as a witness forever.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Orta around that time began to draw parallels between the way he had been treated and the way Daniel Pantaleo was being treated. The two men had somehow switched fates. Pantaleo had actually killed Eric Garner, but it seemed like Orta was somehow stepping into what should have been Pantaleo&rsquo;s role of the man being hunted for the crime.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 257</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;[…] a prison construction project that was being pushed by erstwhile liberal-hero governor Mario Cuomo after he&rsquo;d undertaken the largest prison construction campaign seen in the industrial world since Stalin.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 259</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;At any given time, on any list of the most miserable places in New York City, the downtown arraignments court at 100 Centre Street in Manhattan would have to rank pretty high. This grim little hall smells like mold and features beat-up wooden pews for benches, and most of the action inside involves sending people nobody cares about to places the public will never see, down the toilet of the city&rsquo;s medieval jail system.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 261</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Dear shot five cops and killed one, but the police conspicuously forgot to beat him after capture, a fact that didn&rsquo;t go unnoticed in Eric Garner&rsquo;s old neighborhood. &ldquo;Look at him. Not a mark on his face,&rdquo; Annan says, shaking his head.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 268</div></div><p>Cops flip out at black insouciance. Uppity Negros make cops mad. White cop-killers don&rsquo;t push their buttons nearly as much.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;In Annan&rsquo;s case, if Officers Raso and D&rsquo;Albero had managed to avoid crippling their suspect, they&rsquo;d probably have gotten a conviction. Even if what actually happened is that two cops barged into a parked car and committed a groping blind search on private property without any reason at all beyond Annan being black and in the wrong place, it likely would&rsquo;ve worked.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 269</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Even if someone like Annan is completely innocent and there&rsquo;s no evidence to convict him, he&rsquo;s now got to put his fate in the hands of a system that has already proven itself at least somewhat corrupt by letting the case go toward trial in the first place.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 271</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The case would be a bizarre tale of a man suddenly and without context assaulting two officers on the streets of Staten Island shortly before having his leg broken in three places. The judge stared, clearly hoping that the young ADA would drop the charges and remove this ridiculous, time-consuming, and incidentally quite plainly corrupt case from His Honor&rsquo;s docket.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 272</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;The Donovan campaign brought the Garner story near its bizarre circular end. What began as a tragedy that momentarily forced even most white Americans to think about the dangers of overaggressive policing had flipped and become a cause for a significant percentage of white conservatives, who now cast themselves as victims in the story.</p>
<p>&ldquo;They saw themselves as a besieged minority, surrounded by a coalition of ivory-tower liberals, work-averse ethnic groups, and immigrants looking for handouts. They were tired of being called racists and were beginning to wonder why it was that only blacks and Latinos and Muslims and whoever else were allowed to have identity politics. What about us? Who looks out for our interests? Who fights for us? They were determined to elevate and protect the men—and it was mostly men—who put themselves on the line to maintain the system they&rsquo;d come to know and their place at the top of it. They honored the ones who&rsquo;d fight—and kill, if necessary—for that order.&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 278</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Erica thought that the way people all over the country sent money to people like George Zimmerman and Darren Wilson, the policeman in Ferguson, was designed to send people like her a message.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 279</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;[…] in the end mostly what people in power wanted to do was nothing at all, unless there was an immediate benefit in it for them.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 280</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;The report basically said that the cities were blowing up because black America was tired of living in a racist country where there were no jobs.</p>
<p>&ldquo;Detailing extensive patterns of segregation, discrimination in the job and housing markets, and police brutality, the commission argued that the root of America&rsquo;s problems had to do with the failure to integrate white and black communities.</p>
<p>&ldquo;White people, the commission basically concluded, didn&rsquo;t want to live with black people. They preferred a segregated society and used complex discriminatory practices to enforce the distance.&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 284</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The Kerner predictions came true. By the mid-2010s, even after the election of a black man to the Oval Office, the country was almost completely segregated. Statistics bore this dirty little secret out.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 285</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;On close inspection, these great cities, not coincidentally all sites of horrific police brutality controversies in recent times, are actually just collections of tense racial archipelagoes where people of different races don&rsquo;t live near one another or socialize.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 285</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;The civil rights movement ended in a kind of negotiated compromise. Black Americans were granted legal equality, while white America was allowed to nurture and maintain an illusion of innocence, even as it continued to live in almost complete separation.</p>
<p>&ldquo;Black America always saw the continuing schism. But white America has traditionally been free to ignore and be untroubled by it and to believe it had reached the &ldquo;postracial&rdquo; stage of its otherwise proud history.&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 285</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;This forgetting process is what police are for.</p>
<p>&ldquo;Aggressive policing maintains the reality of segregation in part by policing the borders separating poor black neighborhoods from affluent white ones. But more important, it maintains the illusion of integration by allowing police officers to take the fall for policies driven by the white taxpayers on the other side of the blue wall.&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 286</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The ideas we supposedly learned in the sixties, that people are people and what differences we have must be cultural and political, not racial, never quite stuck. Not really. And the incompleteness of that civil rights movement finally surfaced in the form of a national counterrevolt that seized every form of power in this country.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 288</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;For James Knight, the death of his friend and the rise of Trump are linked. Just days after Trump&rsquo;s Alabama rally, he reflects on what it all means. Instead of providing a wake-up call, Garner&rsquo;s death might have just ended up driving hidden beliefs to the surface.</p>
<p>&ldquo;&ldquo;You can see now how America really is.&rdquo; He sighs. &ldquo;Most of the time, it was hidden, people didn&rsquo;t say things like they&rsquo;re saying now.&rdquo; James sits on a stoop not far from where Garner had been killed, looks around, and shakes his head. &ldquo;But now you can see with Trump, the support he has behind him, how it&rsquo;s growing, you see what America is really feeling behind closed doors,&rdquo; he says. &ldquo;They&rsquo;re letting us know what they think of us.&rdquo;&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 289</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Erica rarely spoke of her father as a hero or a martyr. He was, she realized, &ldquo;just a man,&rdquo; a single flawed person ground up by the power of the state. Eric Garner was murdered by history. The motive was the secret sin of a divided society, a country frozen in time for more than fifty years, stopped one crucial step short of reconciliation and determined to stay there. Now the long line of armor and weaponry arrayed against a single grieving woman appeared as symbols of our desire to separate.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 292</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;As was revealed in the Stop-and-Frisk lawsuit, the problem was that the policy pre-concluded that some people are more prone to crime than others. Simply looking a certain way became probable cause. That some of the people who ended up being searched and/or roughed up turned out to be criminals, and some didn&rsquo;t, seemed totally random and irrelevant to me. The real issue was that we employed the strategy in some places and not in others.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 300</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The lengths we went to as a society to crush someone of such modest ambitions—Garner&rsquo;s big dream was to someday sit down at work—were awesome to contemplate. What happened to Garner spoke to the increasing desperation of white America to avoid having to even see, much less speak to or live alongside, people like him.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 303</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The police are blamed for these deaths, and often rightly so, but the highly confrontational, physically threatening strategies cops such as Daniel Pantaleo employ draw their power from the tacit approval of upscale white voters. Whether they admit it or not, many voters would rather that Eric Garner be dead and removed from view somewhere than living and eating Cheetos on the stoop next door.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 303</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;This tiny act of defiance triggered not just a preposterous display of force but the mother of all disproportionate bureaucratic responses. The latter encompassed an apparent thrown case by the district attorney&rsquo;s office, months of grand jury sessions, multiple judges in multiple courts holding the line against inquiries, years of obstinate refusal by city officials to turn over records, a sweeping effort by police to target individuals on the block deemed responsible for the controversy, and countless other actions.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 304</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;But Eric Garner isn&rsquo;t a symbol. He was a flesh-and-blood person—interesting, imperfect, funny, ambitious, and alive—who just happened to stumble into the thresher of America&rsquo;s reactionary racist insanity at exactly the wrong time. But his story—about how ethnic resentments can be manipulated politically to leave us vulnerable to the lawless violence of our own government—is not his alone. His bad luck has now become ours.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 305</div></div>      </div>
      </div>
        <div class="footer">
    <div class="footer-data"><div class="footer-links"><ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/contact.php" title="">Contact</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/support.php" title="">Support</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/privacy.php" title="">Privacy</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/rights.php" title="">Rights</a></li></ul></div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="copyright">Copyright (c) 1999-2026 earthli.com. All Rights Reserved.</div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="versions">Powered by <ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore/app_news.php">earthli News 3.7</a></li><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore" title="">earthli WebCore&trade; 3.7</a></li></ul></div></div>    </div>
      </div>
  </div>  </body>
</html>
]]>
  </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
      <title type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[La Peste by Albert Camus (1947; fr, read in 2020)]]>
  </title>
    <id>https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3986</id>
    <link href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3986"/>
    <updated>2020-06-21T19:19:04+02:00</updated>
    <author>
        <name type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[Marco von Ballmoos]]>
  </name>
      <uri>https://earthli.com/users/marco</uri>
    </author>
      <summary type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<blockquote class="quote abstract "><div>Disclaimer: these are notes I took while reading this book. They include citations I found interesting or enlightening or particularly well-written. In some cases, I&rsquo;ve pointed out which of these applies to which citation; in others, I have not. Any benefit you gain from reading these notes is... [<a class="complete-text-link" href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3986">More</a>]</div></blockquote>]]>
  </summary>
      <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<html lang="en">
  <head>
    <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/themes/ice.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/fonts/raleway.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/core/medium.css">
  </head>
  <body>
<div class="style-controls">  <div class="page">
    <div class="page-body">
<div class="info-box-top">
<p>
Published by <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_user.php?name=marco" title="Marco von Ballmoos" class="visible">marco</a> on <span class="date-time">21. Jun 2020 19:19:04 (GMT-5)</span>
</p>
</div>
      <div class="text-flow wide">
  <blockquote class="quote abstract "><div>Disclaimer: these are notes I took while reading this book. They include citations I found interesting or enlightening or particularly well-written. In some cases, I&rsquo;ve pointed out which of these applies to which citation; in others, I have not. Any benefit you gain from reading these notes is purely incidental to the purpose they serve of reminding me what I once read. Please see Wikipedia for a summary if I&rsquo;ve failed to provide one sufficient for your purposes. If my notes serve to trigger an interest in this book, then I&rsquo;m happy for you.</div></blockquote><p>This is a work of fiction about a plague that takes place in 1947 in the Algerian city of Oran, on the Mediterranean coast. It documents a nearly overwhelmingly deadly disease.</p>
<p>The plague creeps in on little rats&rsquo; feet.</p>
<p>Doctor Rieux finds dead rats in unusual places, in residential buildings, in stairwells. The health and sanitation services confirm that they&rsquo;re killing an increasing number of rats per day, dozens to hundreds. The doctor&rsquo;s building&rsquo;s superintendent dies of a fever. He had engorged and enlarged buboes (lymph nodes). Rieux suspects that the plague has come to town. The good doctor sees other patients with the same symptoms and sounds the alarm, beseeching the medical council for the town to declare a quarantine and to speak the ugly word &ldquo;pestilence&rdquo; or &ldquo;bubonic plague&rdquo;.</p>
<p>The plague is inevitable and does not care whether it is recognized as such or not. It claims victims until, at 30 per day, the town is closed off to the outside world. Rieux&rsquo;s wife had been sent to a sanatorium a few days earlier for an unrelated illness. He, like everyone else, is reduced to communicating with her in short telegrams. Rail travel stops.</p>
<p>Rambert, the journalist, plans an escape that becomes more and more elaborate and prolonged, dragging out for weeks of planning with Gonzales and his two cohorts. He grows closer and closer to Tarrou (a tourist), Rieux, and Grand, who are working night and day to care for patients, sleeping only four hours per night. Their dedication—and Tarrou telling Rambert that Rieux, too, is not able to be with his wife—convinces Rambert to stay and join in the fight against the plague.</p>
<p>The plague drags on for months and months. Castel&rsquo;s serum doesn&rsquo;t work on a young boy/baby, but seems to be able to help some others. Father Paneloux succumbs to a different disease—nature doesn&rsquo;t care about irony.</p>
<p>In one of my favorite scenes, on a hot night in the fall, Tarrou and Rambert go swimming together as Tarrou tells Rieux his life story. I really liked the evocative style in which it was written.</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;Rieux se mit sur le dos et se tint immobile, face au ciel renversé, plein de lune et d’étoiles. Il respira longuement.</p>
<p>&ldquo;[…]</p>
<p>&ldquo;Rieux se retourna, se mit au niveau de son ami, et nagea dans le même rythme. Tarrou avançait avec plus de puissance que lui et il dut précipiter son allure. Pendant quelques minutes, ils avancèrent avec la même cadence et la même vigueur, solitaires, loin du monde, libérés enfin de la ville et de la peste.</p>
<p>&ldquo;[…]</p>
<p>&ldquo;Habillés de nouveau, ils repartirent sans avoir prononcé un mot. Mais ils avaient le même cœur et le souvenir de cette nuit leur était doux.&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote><p>Grand catches the plague, but recovers. God laughs. The plague number start to decline and the people can no longer be held back from celebrating the reopening of the city after nearly ¾ of a year.</p>
<p>The plague takes a few more on its way out, though: Othon (the father of the baby whom Castel could not save) succumbs; Tarrou slips away, through Rieux&rsquo;s fingers. Cottard goes mad because his black-market business will come to an end. Rambert reunites with his wife. Rieux learns of the death of his wife, just days before the gates opened. He has lost his best friend and his wife. God laughs, alone privy to his mad plan.</p>
<p>The plague is inevitable. It takes the course that it wants. Humans can channel it and ameliorate its effects, but they cannot stop it, not before it itself has decided that is finished. &ldquo;It&rsquo;s done when I say it&rsquo;s done,&rdquo; seems to be the motto of a plague, no matter what level of technology man achieves. It is the same with any natural disaster: a tsunami also does not listen to reason. There is no use hating it. It wouldn&rsquo;t care if you did.</p>
<p>Nearly all of the major stages in this novel have been matched blow-for-blow by our own recent and ongoing experience with COVID-19. Denial, desperation, the rich fleeing the city, closing the city down, settling into resigned isolation, travel restrictions, hygiene measures, and so on. The joy at the end, when the plague mysteriously recedes? We can only hope that our story includes this part, as well.</p>
<p>The similarities are many. For example, the book describes the rich fleeing the city, as they did everywhere there were lockdowns (e.g. a large percentage fo NYC&rsquo;s richest population moved themselves north, out of harm&rsquo;s way.</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;On demandait des mesures radicales, on accusait les autorités, et certains qui avaient des maisons au bord de la mer parlaient déjà de s’y retirer.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>The fear sets in:</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;C’est à partir de ce moment que la peur, et la réflexion avec elle, commencèrent.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>The collecting of statistics—also a modern obsession and made much easier by the Internet—and the dawning realization that the plague is real:</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Mais, en somme, il suffit que quelqu’un songeât à faire l’addition. L’addition était consternante. En quelques jours à peine, les cas mortels se multiplièrent et il devint évident pour ceux qui se préoccupaient de ce mal curieux qu’il s’agissait d’une véritable épidémie.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>The matter-of-fact, rational Rieux notifying the hopeful morons on his council that the plague does not care what they think, that the mission is to save people from this calamity, not to pretend that it&rsquo;s less bad than it is and then to regret not having done something sooner.</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;[…] si elle n’est pas stoppée, elle risque de tuer la moitié de la ville avant deux mois. Par conséquent, il importe peu que vous l’appeliez peste ou fièvre de croissance. Il importe seulement que vous l’empêchiez de tuer la moitié de la ville.</p>
<p>&ldquo;[…]</p>
<p>&ldquo;La question, insista Rieux, n’est pas de savoir si les mesures prévues par la loi sont graves mais si elles sont nécessaires pour empêcher la moitié de la ville d’être tuée.&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote><p>Camus eloquently describes the pain of sudden and unplanned separation from family and friends for an unknown period of time:</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Une des conséquences les plus remarquables de la fermeture des portes fut, en effet, la soudaine séparation où furent placés des êtres qui n’y étaient pas préparés. Des mères et des enfants, des époux, des amants qui avaient cru procéder quelques jours auparavant à une séparation temporaire, qui s’étaient embrassés sur le quai de notre gare avec deux ou trois recommandations, certains de se revoir quelques jours ou quelques semaines plus tard, enfoncés dans la stupide confiance humaine, à peine distraits par ce départ de leurs préoccupations habituelles, se virent d’un seul coup éloignés sans recours, empêchés de se rejoindre ou de communiquer.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>As with our most recent experience, the word &ldquo;solidarity&rdquo; had to be dusted off and, once again, be allowed to take center stage. To protect others and be protected by others, to hold together and defeat the common enemy of the plague, saving as many as possible.</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;On peut dire que cette invasion brutale de la maladie eut pour premier effet d’obliger nos concitoyens à agir comme s’ils n’avaient pas de sentiments individuels.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>Or, even not knowing how long it would last and the ensuing impatience felt by all when an arbitrarily set deadline had been passed. We are witnessing the same in the people as the first wave has been managed by most countries and the people itch for a return to normality. We will see what happens when the inevitable second wave comes.</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;En particulier, tous nos concitoyens se privèrent très vite, même en public, de l’habitude qu’ils avaient pu prendre de supputer la durée de leur séparation. Pourquoi ? C’est que lorsque les plus pessimistes l’avaient fixée par exemple à six mois, lorsqu’ils avaient épuisé d’avance toute l’amertume de ces mois à venir, hissé à grand-peine leur courage au niveau de cette épreuve, tendu leurs dernières forces pour demeurer sans faiblir à la hauteur de cette souffrance étirée sur une si longue suite de jours, alors, parfois, un ami de rencontre, un avis donné par un journal, un soupçon fugitif ou une brusque clairvoyance, leur donnait l’idée qu’après tout, il n’y avait pas de raison pour que la maladie ne durât pas plus de six mois, et peut-être un an, ou plus encore.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>Paired with this feeling, though, was a confidence that the plague is something that happens to others. We all do the same today, hoping against hope that we won&rsquo;t be affected. We hear that 1-2% will die if 70% get it—we hope that we won&rsquo;t die; we hope that, should we get it, it leaves no lasting mark. We hope. We don&rsquo;t reason. We can&rsquo;t all be right.</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Beaucoup cependant espéraient toujours que l’épidémie allait s’arrêter et qu’ils seraient épargnés avec leur famille. En conséquence, ils ne se sentaient encore obligés à rien. La peste n’était pour eux qu’une visiteuse désagréable qui devait partir un jour puisqu’elle était venue.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>The plague takes its victims and ceremonies change: for example, the citizens of Oran were no longer allowed to mourn or attend funerals as before, a restriction we have as well in many places.</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Toutes les formalités avaient été simplifiées et d’une manière générale la pompe funéraire avait été supprimée. Les malades mouraient loin de leur famille et on avait interdit les veillées rituelles, si bien que celui qui était mort dans la soirée passait sa nuit tout seul et celui qui mourait dans la journée était enterré sansdélai.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>What we did not have was the rats at the beginning (signaling the onset of the virus), nor did we have reduced communication, as they did:</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Les communications téléphoniques interurbaines, autorisées au début, provoquèrent de tels encombrements aux cabines publiques et sur les lignes, qu’elles furent totalement suspendues pendant quelques jours, puis sévèrement limitées à ce qu’on appelait les cas urgents, comme la mort, la naissance et le mariage.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>What we do have is conspiracy theories and outright denial that the plague is happening—something the Oranans didn&rsquo;t have the luxury of indulging, as their plague was considerably more aggressive and deadly and, thus, could not be wished away. The plague attacked the &ldquo;bubons&rdquo; or lymph nodes, not the lungs, and was perhaps thus more disgusting, as in this description of Rieux&rsquo;s work on a patient:</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Deux coups de bistouri en croix et les ganglions déversaient une purée mêlée de sang. Les malades saignaient, écartelés. Mais des taches apparaissaient au ventre et aux jambes, un ganglion cessait de suppurer, puis se regonflait. La plupart du temps, le malade mourait, dans une odeur épouvantable.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>Still, they gathered information wherever they could, trying to put together as positive a picture as their reason allowed.</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;On pouvait voir, par exemple, les plus intelligents d’entre eux faire mine de chercher comme tout le monde dans les journaux, ou bien dans les émissions radiophoniques, des raisons de croire à une fin rapide de la peste, et concevoir apparemment des espoirs chimériques, ou éprouver des craintes sans fondement, à la lecture de considérations qu’un journaliste avait écrites un peu au hasard, en bâillant d’ennui.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>Though the plague moves slowly, at least it moves over time, showing some evidence of its passage. Can you imagine the denialism and conspiracy theories that would accompany something like an asteroid strike detected two years prior to impact? Mankind would be utterly and ideologically unable to prepare for something like that and would, despite an ostensibly higher intelligence, go the way of the dinosaurs before them.</p>
<p>They had speculation as well, driving prices into the stratosphere, as well as a clear divide between how the rich and poor would fare in the crisis.</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;La spéculation s’en était mêlée et on offrait à des prix fabuleux des denrées de première nécessité qui manquaient sur le marché ordinaire. Les familles pauvres se trouvaient ainsi dans une situation très pénible, tandis que les familles riches ne manquaient à peu près de rien.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>There is much to admire in the prose, with many beautifully written sections. E.g. <span class="quote-inline">&ldquo;La nuit, les grands cris des bateaux invisibles, la rumeur qui montait de la mer et de la foule qui s’écoulait […]&rdquo;</span>—describing the feeling of the city at night, by the shore—or the much longer, and also lovingly rendered description of the city at night, under a full moon,</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Sous les ciels de lune, elle alignait ses murs blanchâtres et ses rues rectilignes, jamais tachées par la masse noire d’un arbre, jamais troublées par le pas d’un promeneur ni le cri d’un chien. La grande cité silencieuse n’était plus alors qu’un assemblage de cubes massifs et inertes, entre lesquels les effigies taciturnes de bienfaiteurs oubliés ou d’anciens grands hommes étouffés à jamais dans le bronze s’essayaient seules, avec leurs faux visages de pierre ou de fer, à évoquer une image dégradée de ce qui avait été l’homme. Ces idoles médiocres trônaient sous un ciel épais, dans les carrefours sans vie, brutes insensibles qui figuraient assez bien le règne immobile où nous étions entrés ou du moins son ordre ultime, celui d’une nécropole où la peste, la pierre et la nuit auraient fait taire enfin toute voix.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>The general helplessness comes through—<span class="quote-inline">&ldquo;Ils se croyaient libres et personne ne sera jamais libre tant qu’il y aura des fléaux.&rdquo;</span>—but the essentially existentialist attitude shines through that you <em>do what you can anyway because what else is there?</em> <span class="quote-inline">&ldquo;La bêtise insiste toujours {…}&rdquo;</span> Either you kill yourself or you make the best of it, but being useless is worse than either.</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Peut-être, répondit le docteur, mais vous savez, je me sens plus de solidarité avec les vaincus qu’avec les saints. Je n’ai pas de goût, je crois, pour l’héroïsme et la sainteté. Ce qui m’intéresse, c’est d’être un homme.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Il ne fallait pas écouter ces moralistes qui disaient qu’il fallait se mettre à genoux et tout abandonner. Il fallait seulement commencer de marcher en avant, dans la ténèbre, un peu à l’aveuglette, et essayer de faire du bien.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><h2>Citations</h2><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Le 28 avril, cependant, Ransdoc annonçait une collecte de huit mille rats environ et l’anxiété était à son comble dans la ville. On demandait des mesures radicales, on accusait les autorités, et certains qui avaient des maisons au bord de la mer parlaient déjà de s’y retirer. Mais, le lendemain, l’agence annonça que le phénomène avait cessé brutalement et que le service de dératisation n’avait collecté qu’une quantité négligeable de rats morts. La ville respira.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 162-165</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;De ce point de vue, ils se trouvaient en somme dans l’erreur et leurs idées étaient à réviser. Si tout s’était arrêté là, les habitudes sans doute l’eussent emporté. Mais d’autres parmi nos concitoyens, et qui n’étaient pas toujours concierges ni pauvres, durent suivre la route sur laquelle M. Michel s’était engagé le premier. C’est à partir de ce moment que la peur, et la réflexion avec elle, commencèrent.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 234-237</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Deux coups de bistouri en croix et les ganglions déversaient une purée mêlée de sang. Les malades saignaient, écartelés. Mais des taches apparaissaient au ventre et aux jambes, un ganglion cessait de suppurer, puis se regonflait. La plupart du temps, le malade mourait, dans une odeur épouvantable.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 373-375</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Mais, en somme, il suffit que quelqu’un songeât à faire l’addition. L’addition était consternante. En quelques jours à peine, les cas mortels se multiplièrent et il devint évident pour ceux qui se préoccupaient de ce mal curieux qu’il s’agissait d’une véritable épidémie.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 378-380</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Quand une guerre éclate, les gens disent : « Ça ne durera pas, c’est trop bête. » Et sans doute une guerre est certainement trop bête, mais cela ne l’empêche pas de durer. La bêtise insiste toujours, on s’en apercevrait si l’on ne pensait pas toujours à soi.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 396-398</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Ils se croyaient libres et personne ne sera jamais libre tant qu’il y aura des fléaux.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 404-404</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Les foyers d’infection sont en extension croissante. À l’allure où la maladie se répand, si elle n’est pas stoppée, elle risque de tuer la moitié de la ville avant deux mois. Par conséquent, il importe peu que vous l’appeliez peste ou fièvre de croissance. Il importe seulement que vous l’empêchiez de tuer la moitié de la ville.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 538-540</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;La question, insista Rieux, n’est pas de savoir si les mesures prévues par la loi sont graves mais si elles sont nécessaires pour empêcher la moitié de la ville d’être tuée.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 546-548</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Est-ce que M. Richard pouvait prendre la responsabilité d’affirmer que l’épidémie s’arrêterait sans mesures de prophylaxie rigoureuses ?&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 553-553</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;La nuit, les grands cris des bateaux invisibles, la rumeur qui montait de la mer et de la foule qui s’écoulait, cette heure que Rieux connaissait bien et aimait autrefois lui paraissait aujourd’hui oppressante à cause de tout ce qu’il savait.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 638-640</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Les mesures arrêtées étaient insuffisantes, cela était bien clair. Quant aux salles « spécialement équipées », il les connaissait : deux pavillons hâtivement déménagés de leurs autres malades, leurs fenêtres calfeutrées, entourés d’un cordon sanitaire. Si l’épidémie ne s’arrêtait pas d’elle-même, elle ne serait pas vaincue par les mesures que l’administration avait imaginées.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 667-670</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Une des conséquences les plus remarquables de la fermeture des portes fut, en effet, la soudaine séparation où furent placés des êtres qui n’y étaient pas préparés. Des mères et des enfants, des époux, des amants qui avaient cru procéder quelques jours auparavant à une séparation temporaire, qui s’étaient embrassés sur le quai de notre gare avec deux ou trois recommandations, certains de se revoir quelques jours ou quelques semaines plus tard, enfoncés dans la stupide confiance humaine, à peine distraits par ce départ de leurs préoccupations habituelles, se virent d’un seul coup éloignés sans recours, empêchés de se rejoindre ou de communiquer.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 707-711</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;On peut dire que cette invasion brutale de la maladie eut pour premier effet d’obliger nos concitoyens à agir comme s’ils n’avaient pas de sentiments individuels.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 713-714</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Les communications téléphoniques interurbaines, autorisées au début, provoquèrent de tels encombrements aux cabines publiques et sur les lignes, qu’elles furent totalement suspendues pendant quelques jours, puis sévèrement limitées à ce qu’on appelait les cas urgents, comme la mort, la naissance et le mariage.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 723-725</div></div><p>Here we had it significantly better.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Des hommes qui se croyaient légers en amour retrouvaient une constance. Des fils, qui avaient vécu près de leur mère en la regardant à peine, mettaient toute leur inquiétude et leur regret dans un pli de son visage qui hantait leur souvenir.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 750-752</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Si, quelquefois, nous nous laissions aller à l’imagination et nous plaisions à attendre le coup de sonnette du retour ou un pas familier dans l’escalier, si, à ces moments-là, nous consentions à oublier que les trains étaient immobilisés, si nous nous arrangions alors pour rester chez nous à l’heure où, normalement, un voyageur amené par l’express du soir pouvait être rendu dans notre quartier, bien entendu, ces jeux ne pouvaient durer.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 762-765</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Nous savions alors que notre séparation était destinée à durer et que nous devions essayer de nous arranger avec le temps. Dès lors, nous réintégrions en somme notre condition de prisonniers, nous étions réduits à notre passé, et si même quelques-uns d’entre nous avaient la tentation de vivre dans l’avenir, ils y renonçaient rapidement, autant du moins qu’il leur était possible, en éprouvant les blessures que finalement l’imagination inflige à ceux qui lui font confiance.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 765-769</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;En particulier, tous nos concitoyens se privèrent très vite, même en public, de l’habitude qu’ils avaient pu prendre de supputer la durée de leur séparation. Pourquoi ? C’est que lorsque les plus pessimistes l’avaient fixée par exemple à six mois, lorsqu’ils avaient épuisé d’avance toute l’amertume de ces mois à venir, hissé à grand-peine leur courage au niveau de cette épreuve, tendu leurs dernières forces pour demeurer sans faiblir à la hauteur de cette souffrance étirée sur une si longue suite de jours, alors, parfois, un ami de rencontre, un avis donné par un journal, un soupçon fugitif ou une brusque clairvoyance, leur donnait l’idée qu’après tout, il n’y avait pas de raison pour que la maladie ne durât pas plus de six mois, et peut-être un an, ou plus encore.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 769-774</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Et, de façon très conséquente, ce malheur qui nous venait de l’extérieur, et qui frappait toute une ville, ne nous apportait pas seulement une souffrance injuste dont nous aurions pu nous indigner. Il nous provoquait aussi à nous faire souffrir nous-mêmes et nous faisait ainsi consentir à la douleur.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 807-809</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Pour certains de nos concitoyens, par exemple, ils étaient alors soumis à un autre esclavage qui les mettait au service du soleil et de la pluie. Il semblait, à les voir, qu’ils recevaient pour la première fois, et directement, l’impression du temps qu’il faisait.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 811-813</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;parce qu’ils n’étaient pas seuls en face du monde et que, dans une certaine mesure, l’être qui vivait avec eux se plaçait devant leur univers. À partir de cet instant, au contraire, ils furent apparemment livrés aux caprices du ciel, c’est-à-dire qu’ils souffrirent et espérèrent sans raison.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 815-817</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Et lui, relevant drap et chemise, contemplait en silence les taches rouges sur le ventre et les cuisses, l’enflure des ganglions. La mère regardait entre les jambes de sa fille et criait, sans pouvoir se dominer. Tous les soirs des mères hurlaient ainsi, avec un air abstrait, devant des ventres offerts avec tous leurs signes mortels, tous les soirs des bras s’agrippaient à ceux de Rieux, des paroles inutiles, des promesses et des pleurs se précipitaient, tous les soirs des timbres d’ambulance déclenchaient des crises aussi vaines que toute douleur.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 995-998</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Beaucoup cependant espéraient toujours que l’épidémie allait s’arrêter et qu’ils seraient épargnés avec leur famille. En conséquence, ils ne se sentaient encore obligés à rien. La peste n’était pour eux qu’une visiteuse désagréable qui devait partir un jour puisqu’elle était venue.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 1028-1030</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Beaucoup cependant espéraient toujours que l’épidémie allait s’arrêter et qu’ils seraient épargnés avec leur famille. En conséquence, ils ne se sentaient encore obligés à rien. La peste n’était pour eux qu’une visiteuse désagréable qui devait partir un jour puisqu’elle était venue. Effrayés, mais non désespérés, le moment n’était pas encore arrivé où la peste leur apparaîtrait comme la forme même de leur vie et où ils oublieraient l’existence que, jusqu’à elle, ils avaient pu mener.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 1028-1031</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Ce prêche eut-il de l’effet sur nos concitoyens, il est difficile de le dire. M. Othon, le juge d’instruction, déclara au docteur Rieux qu’il avait trouvé l’exposé du père Paneloux « absolument irréfutable ». Mais tout le monde n’avait pas d’opinion aussi catégorique. Simplement, le prêche rendit plus sensible à certains l’idée, vague jusquelà, qu’ils étaient condamnés, pour un crime inconnu, à un emprisonnement inimaginable. Et alors que les uns continuaient leur petite vie et s’adaptaient à la claustration, pour d’autres, au contraire, leur seule idée fut dès lors de s’évader de cette prison.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 1110-1114</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;De loin en loin, claquaient les coups de feu des équipes spéciales chargées, par une récente ordonnance, de tuer les chiens et les chats qui auraient pu communiquer des puces. Ces détonations sèches contribuaient à mettre dans la ville une atmosphère d’alerte.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 1255-1257</div></div><p>Can you imagine if we had to do this?</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Mais, en même temps, Tarrou entreprenait la description assez minutieuse d’une journée dans la ville empestée et donnait ainsi une idée juste des occupations et de la vie de nos concitoyens pendant cet été : « Personne ne rit que les ivrognes, disait Tarrou, et ceuxlà rient trop.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 1332-1334</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;Tarrou le suivit, mais parut se raviser au moment de sortir, se retourna vers le journaliste et lui dit :</p>
<p>&ldquo;– Savez-vous que la femme de Rieux se trouve dans une maison de santé à quelques centaines de kilomètres d’ici ?</p>
<p>&ldquo;Rambert eut un geste de surprise, mais Tarrou était déjà parti. À la première heure, le lendemain, Rambert téléphonait au docteur :</p>
<p>&ldquo;– Accepteriez-vous que je travaille avec vous jusqu’à ce que j’aie trouvé le moyen de quitter la ville ? Il y eut un silence au bout du fil, et puis :</p>
<p>&ldquo;– Oui, Rambert. Je vous remercie.&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 1851-1855</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Ainsi, à longueur de semaine, les prisonniers de la peste se débattirent comme ils le purent. Et quelques-uns d’entre eux, comme Rambert, arrivaient même à imaginer, on le voit, qu’ils agissaient encore en hommes libres, qu’ils pouvaient encore choisir. Mais, en fait, on pouvait dire à ce moment, au milieu du mois d’août, que la peste avait tout recouvert.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 1855-1857</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Ceux qui y vivaient jusque-là ne purent s’empêcher de considérer cette mesure comme une brimade spécialement dirigée contre eux, et dans tous les cas, ils pensaient par contraste aux habitants des autres quartiers comme à des hommes libres. Ces derniers, en revanche, dans leurs moments difficiles, trouvaient une consolation à imaginer que d’autres étaient encore moins libres qu’eux. « Il y a toujours plus prisonnier que moi » était la phrase qui résumait alors le seul espoir possible.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 1876-1879</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Et sans doute, ce n’était pas l’idée de la prison qui fit alors reculer ces malheureux, mais la certitude commune à tous les habitants qu’une peine de prison équivalait à une peine de mort par suite de l’excessive mortalité qu’on relevait dans la geôle municipale. Bien entendu, cette croyance n’était pas sans fondement. Pour des raisons évidentes, il semblait que la peste s’acharnât particulièrement sur tous ceux qui avaient pris l’habitude de vivre en groupes, soldats, religieux ou prisonniers. Malgré l’isolement de certains détenus, une prison est une communauté, et ce qui le prouve bien, c’est que dans notre prison municipale les gardiens, autant que les prisonniers, payaient leur tribut à la maladie.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 1884-1889</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Sous les ciels de lune, elle alignait ses murs blanchâtres et ses rues rectilignes, jamais tachées par la masse noire d’un arbre, jamais troublées par le pas d’un promeneur ni le cri d’un chien. La grande cité silencieuse n’était plus alors qu’un assemblage de cubes massifs et inertes, entre lesquels les effigies taciturnes de bienfaiteurs oubliés ou d’anciens grands hommes étouffés à jamais dans le bronze s’essayaient seules, avec leurs faux visages de pierre ou de fer, à évoquer une image dégradée de ce qui avait été l’homme. Ces idoles médiocres trônaient sous un ciel épais, dans les carrefours sans vie, brutes insensibles qui figuraient assez bien le règne immobile où nous étions entrés ou du moins son ordre ultime, celui d’une nécropole où la peste, la pierre et la nuit auraient fait taire enfin toute voix.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 1917-1923</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Eh bien, ce qui caractérisait au début nos cérémonies c’était la rapidité ! Toutes les formalités avaient été simplifiées et d’une manière générale la pompe funéraire avait été supprimée. Les malades mouraient loin de leur famille et on avait interdit les veillées rituelles, si bien que celui qui était mort dans la soirée passait sa nuit tout seul et celui qui mourait dans la journée était enterré sansdélai. On avisait la famille, bien entendu, mais, dans la plupart des cas, celle-ci ne pouvait pas se déplacer, étant en quarantaine si elle avait vécu auprès du malade.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 1931-1935</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Du reste, si, au début, le moral de la population avait souffert de ces pratiques, car le désir d’être enterré décemment est plus répandu qu’on ne le croit, un peu plus tard, par bonheur, le problème du ravitaillement devint délicat et l’intérêt des habitants fut dérivé vers des préoccupations plus immédiates. Absorbés par les queues à faire, les démarches à accomplir et les formalités à remplir s’ils voulaient manger, les gens n’eurent pas le temps de songer à la façon dont on mourait autour d’eux et dont ils mourraient un jour.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 1950-1953</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Mais, à partir du moment où la peste se fut réellement emparée de toute la ville, alors son excès même entraîna des conséquences bien commodes, car elle désorganisa toute la vie économique et suscita ainsi un nombre considérable de chômeurs.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 1979-1981</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Et pendant toute la fin de l’été, comme au milieu des pluies de l’automne, on put voir le long de la corniche, au cœur de chaque nuit, passer d’étranges convois de tramways sans voyageurs, brinquebalant au-dessus de la mer. Les habitants avaient fini par savoir ce qu’il en était. Et malgré les patrouilles qui interdisaient l’accès de la corniche, des groupes parvenaient à se glisser bien souvent dans les rochers qui surplombent les vagues et à lancer des fleurs dans les baladeuses, au passage des tramways. On entendait alors les véhicules cahoter encore dans la nuit d’été, avec leur chargement de fleurs et de morts.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 2003-2007</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;C’était ce genre d’évidence ou d’appréhensions, en tout cas, qui entretenait chez nos concitoyens le sentiment de leur exil et de leur séparation. À cet égard, le narrateur sait parfaitement combien il est regrettable de ne pouvoir rien rapporter ici qui soit vraiment spectaculaire, comme par exemple quelque héros réconfortant ou quelque action éclatante, pareils à ceux qu’on trouve dans les vieux récits. C’est que rien n’est moins spectaculaire qu’un fléau et, par leur durée même, les grands malheurs sont monotones. Dans le souvenir de ceux qui les ont vécues, les journées terribles de la peste n’apparaissaient pas comme de grandes flammes somptueuses et cruelles, mais plutôt comme un interminable piétinement qui écrasait tout sur son passage.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 2018-2023</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;On pouvait voir, par exemple, les plus intelligents d’entre eux faire mine de chercher comme tout le monde dans les journaux, ou bien dans les émissions radiophoniques, des raisons de croire à une fin rapide de la peste, et concevoir apparemment des espoirs chimériques, ou éprouver des craintes sans fondement, à la lecture de considérations qu’un journaliste avait écrites un peu au hasard, en bâillant d’ennui.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 2076-2079</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Car, étrangement, ce qui montait alors vers les terrasses encore ensoleillées, en l’absence des bruits de véhicules et de machines qui font d’ordinaire tout le langage des villes, ce n’était qu’une énorme rumeur de pas et de voix sourdes, le douloureux glissement de milliers de semelles rythmé par le sifflement du fléau dans le ciel alourdi, un piétinement interminable et étouffant enfin, qui remplissait peu à peu toute la ville et qui, soir après soir, donnait sa voix la plus fidèle et la plus morne à l’obstination aveugle qui, dans nos cœurs, remplaçait alors l’amour.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 2094-2098</div></div><p>Beautiful prose.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Des épouses lui prenaient le poignet et hurlaient : « Docteur, donnez-lui la vie ! » Mais il n’était pas là pour donner la vie, il était là pour ordonner l’isolement. À quoi servait la haine qu’il lisait alors sur les visages ? « Vous n’avez pas de cœur », lui avait-on dit un jour. Mais si, il en avait un. Il lui servait à supporter les vingt heures par jour où il voyait mourir des hommes qui étaient faits pour vivre. Il lui servait à recommencer tous les jours. Désormais, il avait juste assez de cœur pour ça. Comment ce cœur aurait-il suffi à donner la vie ?&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 2141-2145</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Car ils avaient tendance alors à éviter tous les gestes qui n’étaient pas absolument indispensables et qui leur paraissaient toujours au-dessus de leurs forces. C’est ainsi que ces hommes en vinrent à négliger de plus en plus souvent les règles d’hygiène qu’ils avaient codifiées, à oublier quelques-unes des nombreuses désinfections qu’ils devaient pratiquer sur eux-mêmes, à courir quelquefois, sans être prémunis contre la contagion, auprès des malades atteints de peste pulmonaire,&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 2158-2161</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Il est complice de tout ce qu’il voit, des superstitions, des frayeurs illégitimes, des susceptibilités de ces âmes en alerte ; de leur manie de vouloir parler le moins possible de la peste et de ne pas cesser cependant d’en parler ; de leur affolement et de leurs pâleurs au moindre mal de tête depuis qu’ils savent que la maladie commence par des céphalées&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 2199-2202</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Tarrou haussa les épaules : – À mon âge, on est forcément sincère. Mentir est trop fatigant.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 2321-2321</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;deux masques de gaze hydrophile, en tendit un à Rambert et l’invita à s’en couvrir. Le journaliste demanda si cela servait à quelque chose et Tarrou répondit que non, mais que cela donnait confiance aux autres.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 2326-2327</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Il ouvrit l’un d’eux, tira d’un stérilisateur deux masques de gaze hydrophile, en tendit un à Rambert et l’invita à s’en couvrir. Le journaliste demanda si cela servait à quelque chose et Tarrou répondit que non, mais que cela donnait confiance aux autres.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 2325-2327</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Chaque fois que l’un d’eux parlait, le masque de gaze se gonflait et s’humidifiait à l’endroit de la bouche. Cela faisait une conversation un peu irréelle, comme un dialogue de statues.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 2339-2340</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;– Oui, dit Rambert, mais il peut y avoir de la honte à être heureux tout seul.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 2346-2347</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Et comme les braves femmes qui, dans les églises en ce moment, ayant appris que les bubons qui se formaient étaient la voie naturelle par où le corps rejetait son infection, disaient : « Mon Dieu, donnezlui des bubons », le chrétien saurait s’abandonner à la volonté divine, même incompréhensible. On ne pouvait dire : « Cela je le comprends ; mais ceci est inacceptable », il fallait sauter au cœur de cet inacceptable qui nous était offert, justement pour que nous fissions notre choix. La souffrance des enfants était notre pain amer, mais sans ce pain, notre âme périrait de sa faim spirituelle.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 2546-2550</div></div><p>An extreme example, but satirically well-done</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Il ne fallait même pas penser à rejoindre ces pestiférés perses qui lançaient leurs hardes sur les piquets sanitaires chrétiens en invoquant le ciel à haute voix pour le prier de donner la peste à ces infidèles qui voulaient combattre le mal envoyé par Dieu.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 2554-2556</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Il ne fallait pas écouter ces moralistes qui disaient qu’il fallait se mettre à genoux et tout abandonner. Il fallait seulement commencer de marcher en avant, dans la ténèbre, un peu à l’aveuglette, et essayer de faire du bien.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 2565-2567</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Au milieu de vomissements de sang, les malades étaient enlevés beaucoup plus rapidement. La contagiosité risquait maintenant d’être plus grande, avec cette nouvelle forme de l’épidémie. Au vrai, les avis des spécialistes avaient toujours été contradictoires sur ce point. Pour plus de sûreté cependant, le personnel sanitaire continuait de respirer sous des masques de gaze désinfectée.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 2680-2682</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;On pouvait cependant avoir d’autres sujets d’inquiétude par suite des difficultés du ravitaillement qui croissaient avec le temps. La spéculation s’en était mêlée et on offrait à des prix fabuleux des denrées de première nécessité qui manquaient sur le marché ordinaire. Les familles pauvres se trouvaient ainsi dans une situation très pénible, tandis que les familles riches ne manquaient à peu près de rien.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 2683-2686</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Oui, ils avaient tous l’air de la méfiance. Puisqu’on les avait séparés des autres, ce n’était pas sans raison, et ils montraient le visage de ceux qui cherchent leurs raisons, et qui craignent. Chacun de ceux que Tarrou regardait avait l’œil inoccupé, tous avaient l’air de souffrir d’une séparation très générale d’avec ce qui faisait leur vie. Et comme ils ne pouvaient pas toujours penser à la mort, ils ne pensaient à rien. Ils étaient en vacances.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 2730-2733</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Il y avait ainsi, dans la ville, plusieurs autres camps dont le narrateur, par scrupule et par manque d’information directe, ne peut dire plus. Mais ce qu’il peut dire, c’est que l’existence de ces camps, l’odeur d’hommes qui en venait, les énormes voix des haut-parleurs dans le crépuscule, le mystère des murs et la crainte de ces lieux réprouvés, pesaient lourdement sur le moral de nos concitoyens et ajoutaient encore au désarroi et au malaise de tous.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 2760-2763</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Savez-vous que si le condamné faisait deux pas en avant, il heurterait les fusils avec sa poitrine ? Savez-vous qu’à cette courte distance, les fusilleurs concentrent leur tir sur la région du cœur et qu’à eux tous, avec leurs grosses balles, ils y font un trou où l’on pourrait mettre le poing ? Non, vous ne le savez pas parce que ce sont là des détails dont on ne parle pas. Le sommeil des hommes est plus sacré que la vie pour les pestiférés. On ne doit pas empêcher les braves gens de dormir. Il y faudrait du mauvais goût, et le goût consiste à ne pas insister, tout le monde sait ça. Mais moi, je n’ai pas bien dormi depuis ce temps-là. Le mauvais goût m’est resté dans la bouche et je n’ai pas cessé d’insister, c’est-àdire d’y penser.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 2857-2862</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Peut-être, répondit le docteur, mais vous savez, je me sens plus de solidarité avec les vaincus qu’avec les saints. Je n’ai pas de goût, je crois, pour l’héroïsme et la sainteté. Ce qui m’intéresse, c’est d’être un homme.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 2918-2919</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Elle sifflait doucement au pied des grands blocs de la jetée et, comme ils les gravissaient, elle leur apparut, épaisse comme du velours, souple et lisse comme une bête. Ils s’installèrent sur les rochers tournés vers le large. Les eaux se gonflaient et redescendaient lentement. Cette respiration calme de la mer faisait naître et disparaître des reflets huileux à la surface des eaux. Devant eux, la nuit était sans limites.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 2929-2932</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Rieux se mit sur le dos et se tint immobile, face au ciel renversé, plein de lune et d’étoiles. Il respira longuement.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 2937-2938</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Rieux se retourna, se mit au niveau de son ami, et nagea dans le même rythme. Tarrou avançait avec plus de puissance que lui et il dut précipiter son allure. Pendant quelques minutes, ils avancèrent avec la même cadence et la même vigueur, solitaires, loin du monde, libérés enfin de la ville et de la peste.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 2939-2941</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Habillés de nouveau, ils repartirent sans avoir prononcé un mot. Mais ils avaient le même cœur et le souvenir de cette nuit leur était doux. Quand ils aperçurent de loin la sentinelle de la peste, Rieux savait que Tarrou se disait, comme lui, que la maladie venait de les oublier, que cela était bien, et qu’il fallait maintenant recommencer. Oui, il fallait recommencer et la peste n’oubliait personne trop longtemps. Pendant le mois de décembre, elle flamba dans les poitrines de nos concitoyens, elle illumina le four, elle peupla les camps d’ombres aux mains vides, elle ne cessa enfin d’avancer de son allure patiente et saccadée.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 2943-2947</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Mais personne n’osait leur annoncer le dieu d’autrefois, chargé d’offrandes, vieux comme la peine humaine, mais nouveau comme le jeune espoir. Il n’y avait plus de place dans le cœur de tous que pour un très vieil et très morne espoir, celui-là même qui empêche les hommes de se laisser aller à la mort et qui n’est qu’une simple obstination à vivre.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 2976-2979</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Par une belle matinée de mai, une svelte amazone, montée sur une somptueuse jument alezane, parcourait, au milieu des fleurs, les allées du Bois…&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 3012-3013</div></div><p>The final draft of Grand&rsquo;s one sentence, after fifteen pages of refinement.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Mais à midi, rien n’était changé. Le soir, Grand pouvait être considéré comme sauvé. Rieux ne comprenait rien à cette résurrection.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 3022-3023</div></div><p>Mutation?</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Quoique cette brusque retraite de la maladie fût inespérée, nos concitoyens ne se hâtèrent pas de se réjouir. Les mois qui venaient de passer, tout en augmentant leur désir de libération, leur avaient appris la prudence et les avaient habitués à compter de moins en moins sur une fin prochaine de l’épidémie. Cependant, ce fait nouveau était sur toutes les bouches, et, au fond des cœurs, s’agitait un grand espoir inavoué.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 3035-3038</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Mais dans l’ensemble, l’infection reculait sur toute la ligne et les communiqués de la préfecture, qui avaient d’abord fait naître une timide et secrète espérance, finirent par confirmer, dans l’esprit du public, la conviction que la victoire était acquise et que la maladie abandonnait ses positions. À la vérité, il était difficile de décider qu’il s’agissait d’une victoire. On était obligé seulement de constater que la maladie semblait partir comme elle était venue. La stratégie qu’on lui opposait n’avait pas changé, inefficace hier et, aujourd’hui, apparemment heureuse. On avait seulement l’impression que la maladie s’était épuisée elle-même ou peut-être qu’elle se retirait après avoir atteint tous ses objectifs. En quelque sorte, son rôle était fini.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 3060-3065</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Mais, en réalité, les gens qui s’évadaient à ces moments-là obéissaient à des sentiments naturels. Chez les uns, la peste avait enraciné un scepticisme profond dont ils ne pouvaient pas se débarrasser. L’espoir n’avait plus de prise sur eux. Alors même que le temps de la peste était révolu, ils continuaient à vivre selon ses normes. Ils étaient en retard sur les événements.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 3078-3081</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Longtemps après avoir quitté les boulevards, Tarrou et Rieux entendaient encore cette joie les poursuivre, à l’heure même où dans des ruelles désertes, ils longeaient des fenêtres aux volets clos. Et à cause même de leur fatigue, ils ne pouvaient séparer cette souffrance, qui se prolongeait derrière les volets, de la joie qui emplissait les rues un peu plus loin. La délivrance qui approchait avait un visage mêlé de rires et de larmes.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 3113-3116</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Il voulait savoir si l’on pouvait penser que la peste ne changerait rien dans la ville et que tout recommencerait comme auparavant, c’est-à-dire comme si rien ne s’était passé. Tarrou pensait que la peste changerait et ne changerait pas la ville, que, bien entendu, le plus fort désir de nos concitoyens était et serait de faire comme si rien n’était changé et que, partant, rien dans un sens ne serait changé, mais que, dans un autre sens, on ne peut pas tout oublier, même avec la volonté nécessaire, et la peste laisserait des traces, au moins dans les cœurs.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 3176-3180</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Je n’ai pas envie de mourir et je lutterai. Mais si la partie est perdue, je veux faire une bonne fin.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 3223-3224</div></div><p>Tarrou telling Rieux to be straight with him.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;Rieux, articula-t-il enfin, il faudra tout me dire, j’en ai besoin.</p>
<p>&ldquo;– Je vous le promets. L’autre tordit un peu son visage massif dans un sourire.</p>
<p>&ldquo;– Merci. Je n’ai pas envie de mourir et je lutterai. Mais si la partie est perdue, je veux faire une bonne fin. Rieux se baissa et lui serra l’épaule.</p>
<p>&ldquo;– Non, dit-il. Pour devenir un saint, il faut vivre. Luttez.&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 3222-3224</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;C’était une nuit délivrée de la peste. Et il semblait que la maladie chassée par le froid, les lumières et la foule, se fût échappée des profondeurs obscures de la ville et réfugiée dans cette chambre chaude pour donner son ultime assaut au corps inerte de Tarrou. Le fléau ne brassait plus le ciel de la ville. Mais il sifflait doucement dans l’air lourd de la chambre. C’était lui que Rieux entendait depuis des heures. Il fallait attendre que là aussi il s’arrêtât, que là aussi la peste se déclarât vaincue.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 3254-3258</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;À midi, la fièvre était à son sommet. Une sorte de toux viscérale secouait le corps du malade qui commença seulement à cracher du sang. Les ganglions avaient cessé d’enfler.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 3285-3287</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;L’orage qui secouait ce corps de soubresauts convulsifs l’illuminait d’éclairs de plus en plus rares et Tarrou dérivait lentement au fond de cette tempête. Rieux n’avait plus devant lui qu’un masque désormais inerte, où le sourire avait disparu. Cette forme humaine qui lui avait été si proche, percée maintenant de coups d’épieu, brûlée par un mal surhumain, tordue par tous les vents haineux du ciel, s’immergeait à ses yeux dans les eaux de la peste et il ne pouvait rien contre ce naufrage.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 3289-3293</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Dans cette chambre retranchée du monde, audessus de ce corps mort maintenant habillé, Rieux sentit planer le calme surprenant qui, bien des nuits auparavant, sur les terrasses au-dessus de la peste, avait suivi l’attaque des portes. Déjà, à cette époque, il avait pensé à ce silence qui s’élevait des lits où il avait laissé mourir des hommes. C’était partout la même pause, le même intervalle solennel, toujours le même apaisement qui suivait les combats, c’était le silence de la défaite.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 3296-3299</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Il aurait souhaité redevenir celui qui, au début de l’épidémie, voulait courir d’un seul élan hors de la ville et s’élancer à la rencontre de celle qu’il aimait. Mais il savait que cela n’était plus possible. Il avait changé, la peste avait mis en lui une distraction que, de toutes ses forces, il essayait de nier, et qui, cependant, continuait en lui comme une sourde angoisse.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 3354-3357</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Pour le moment, des gens d’origines très différentes se coudoyaient et fraternisaient. L’égalité que la présence de la mort n’avait pas réalisée en fait, la joie de la délivrance l’établissait, au moins pour quelques heures.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 3385-3386</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Ils niaient tranquillement, contre toute évidence, que nous ayons jamais connu ce monde insensé où le meurtre d’un homme était aussi quotidien que celui des mouches, cette sauvagerie bien définie, ce délire calculé, cet emprisonnement qui apportait avec lui une affreuse liberté à l’égard de tout ce qui n’était pas le présent, cette odeur de mort qui stupéfiait tous ceux qu’elle ne tuait pas, ils niaient enfin que nous ayons été ce peuple abasourdi dont tous les jours une partie, entassée dans la gueule d’un four, s’évaporait en fumées grasses, pendant que l’autre, chargée des chaînes de l’impuissance et de la peur, attendait son tour.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 3396-3401</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Peu à peu, il se fondait dans ce grand corps hurlant dont il comprenait de mieux en mieux le cri qui, pour une part au moins, était son cri. Oui, tous avaient souffert ensemble, autant dans leur chair que dans leur âme, d’une vacance difficile, d’un exil sans remède et d’une soif jamais contentée.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 3417-3419</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;le docteur Rieux décida alors de rédiger le récit qui s’achève ici, pour ne pas être de ceux qui se taisent, pour témoigner en faveur de ces pestiférés, pour laisser du moins un souvenir de l’injustice et de la violence qui leur avaient été faites, et pour dire simplement ce qu’on apprend au milieu des fléaux, qu’il y a dans les hommes plus de choses à admirer que de choses à mépriser.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 3527-3529</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Car il savait ce que cette foule en joie ignorait, et qu’on peut lire dans les livres, que le bacille de la peste ne meurt ni ne disparaît jamais, qu’il peut rester pendant des dizaines d’années endormi dans les meubles et le linge, qu’il attend patiemment dans les chambres, les caves, les malles, les mouchoirs et les paperasses, et que, peut-être, le jour viendrait où, pour le malheur et l’enseignement des hommes, la peste réveillerait ses rats et les enverrait mourir dans une cité heureuse.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 3533-3537</div></div>      </div>
      </div>
        <div class="footer">
    <div class="footer-data"><div class="footer-links"><ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/contact.php" title="">Contact</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/support.php" title="">Support</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/privacy.php" title="">Privacy</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/rights.php" title="">Rights</a></li></ul></div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="copyright">Copyright (c) 1999-2026 earthli.com. All Rights Reserved.</div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="versions">Powered by <ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore/app_news.php">earthli News 3.7</a></li><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore" title="">earthli WebCore&trade; 3.7</a></li></ul></div></div>    </div>
      </div>
  </div>  </body>
</html>
]]>
  </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
      <title type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[The Machine Stops by E.M. Forster (1909, read in 2020)]]>
  </title>
    <id>https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3987</id>
    <link href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3987"/>
    <updated>2020-06-01T23:06:38+02:00</updated>
    <author>
        <name type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[Marco von Ballmoos]]>
  </name>
      <uri>https://earthli.com/users/marco</uri>
    </author>
      <summary type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<blockquote class="quote abstract "><div>Disclaimer: these are notes I took while reading this book. They include citations I found interesting or enlightening or particularly well-written. In some cases, I&rsquo;ve pointed out which of these applies to which citation; in others, I have not. Any benefit you gain from reading these notes is... [<a class="complete-text-link" href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3987">More</a>]</div></blockquote>]]>
  </summary>
      <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<html lang="en">
  <head>
    <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/themes/ice.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/fonts/raleway.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/core/medium.css">
  </head>
  <body>
<div class="style-controls">  <div class="page">
    <div class="page-body">
<div class="info-box-top">
<p>
Published by <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_user.php?name=marco" title="Marco von Ballmoos" class="visible">marco</a> on <span class="date-time">1. Jun 2020 23:06:38 (GMT-5)</span>
</p>
</div>
      <div class="text-flow wide">
  <blockquote class="quote abstract "><div>Disclaimer: these are notes I took while reading this book. They include citations I found interesting or enlightening or particularly well-written. In some cases, I&rsquo;ve pointed out which of these applies to which citation; in others, I have not. Any benefit you gain from reading these notes is purely incidental to the purpose they serve of reminding me what I once read. Please see Wikipedia for a summary if I&rsquo;ve failed to provide one sufficient for your purposes. If my notes serve to trigger an interest in this book, then I&rsquo;m happy for you.</div></blockquote><p>I first read <a href="http://www.visbox.com/prajlich/forster.html">this short story</a> at the beginning of 2019, but recently re-read it. In these pandemic days, even more of the story resonated with me than on the first reading.</p>
<p>The story is about a woman named Vashanti and he son Kuno, who live on a future Earth where The Machine has long since taken up the caretaking of mankind—so that people can concentrate on getting and sharing &lsquo;ideas&rdquo;.</p>
<p>Each person is contained in its own little pod. One room for everything. The bed and bath slide out of the floor when needed. Medical equipment descends from the ceiling.</p>
<p>All communication is remote. People almost never see one another physically.</p>
<p>Each person has exactly one book—they all have the same book. It is <span class="quote-inline">&ldquo;The Book of the Machine&rdquo;</span> and it contains everything that anyone would ever need to know about how the world works or how to communicate with The Machine.</p>
<p>Mankind thinks itself free of religion, but it has replaced its classic, irrational religions with a supposedly rational one that ends up in people worshiping The Machine. No-one knows how The Machine works; all of its mechanisms are automated and have been so as long as anyone can remember.</p>
<p>The world has been homogenized.</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Something &ldquo;good enough&rdquo; had long since been accepted by our race.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>The following examples illustrate how our supposedly advanced civilization was pretty easily predicted by Forster a century removed from it. How unique and creative can it possibly be if he was able to predict it so well?</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Vashanti&rdquo;s next move was to turn off the isolation switch, and all the accumulations of the last three minutes burst upon her. The room was filled with the noise of bells, and speaking-tubes. What was the new food like? Could she recommend it? Has she had any ideas lately? Might one tell her one&rsquo;s own ideas? Would she make an engagement to visit the public nurseries at an early date?&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>Does this not describe how a phone or device acts when it returns from isolation? Is this not the experience of an average social-media user &ldquo;coming back&rdquo; to their phone after a temporary absence?</p>
<p>Amazingly, Forster&rsquo;s predictions of video-conferencing are also spot-on:</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The clumsy system of public gatherings had been long since abandoned; neither Vashti nor her audience stirred from their rooms. Seated in her armchair she spoke, while they in their armchairs heard her, fairly well, and saw her, fairly well.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>That the story nails the self-isolation of 2020 due to COVID-19 explains why the story resonated for me more on re-reading now. In our modern case, this live of video-conferencing applies only to the upper-level caste, while lower castes continue to work as usual. We don&rsquo;t have The Machine (yet). In Forster’s vision, the “Machine” took care of day-to-day minutia for everyone, with seemingly no castes left over from the previous civilization. Or, perhaps more accurately, the non-upper-class castes have been eliminated.</p>
<p>In this next section, Forster somehow manages to capture the superficiality of TED Talks nearly a century before they even existed.</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Her lecture, which lasted ten minutes, was well received, and at its conclusion she and many of her audience listened to a lecture on the sea; there were ideas to be got from the sea; the speaker had donned a respirator and visited it lately.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>The listeners are flighty and don&rsquo;t really pay attention to anything specifically—they sip widely but shallowly, adding nothing of value on their own. The lecture on the sea above has absolutely nothing to do with Vashanti&rsquo;s lecture. That reflects our social-media feeds quite well—like hummingbirds, many flit from topic to topic, guided by The Machine.</p>
<p>Hell, Forster even foresaw the delivery culture—albeit here he also foresaw everyone getting access to it, which isn&rsquo;t the case with our modern version of The Machine. In our version, the workings of The Machine are still very much run on the backs of manual labor provided by an underclass.</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;[…] the civilization that had mistaken the functions of the system, and had used it for bringing people to things, instead of for bringing things to people.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>Forster also foresaw the homogenization of travel destinations—our cities have &ldquo;tourist areas&rdquo; that aim to make people comfortable by providing services that they would have at home. There&rsquo;s a Starbucks; there&rsquo;s a McDonalds; there&rsquo;s a theme park.</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;What was the good of going to Peking when it was just like Shrewsbury? Why return to Shrewsbury when it would all be like Peking?&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>Finally, there is the erosion of ideas and information, recycling well-worn thought and denigrating original thought until no-one knows anything of value anymore. Experts are suspect; expertise is evil; information is best when its already known—common sense.</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;And even the lecturers acquiesced when they found that a lecture on the sea was none the less stimulating when compiled out of other lectures that had already been delivered on the same subject. &ldquo;Beware of first- hand ideas!&rdquo; exclaimed one of the most advanced of them. […] Let your ideas be second-hand, and if possible tenth-hand, for then they will be far removed from that disturbing element − direct observation.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>So we have a society homogenized and reduced and made completely dependent on The Machine. (I wonder whether the world of <em>Wall-E</em> was based, at least in part, on this story?) Forster tells us what happens when The Machine stops after mankind has become inescapably dependent on it.</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Man, the flower of all flesh, the noblest of all creatures visible, man who had once made god in his image, and had mirrored his strength on the constellations, beautiful naked man was dying, strangled in the garments that he had woven.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><h2>Citations</h2><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Something &ldquo;good enough&rdquo; had long since been accepted by our race.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;She considered, and chose her words with care. Her son had a queer temper, and she wished to dissuade him from the expedition.</p>
<p>&ldquo;&ldquo;It is contrary to the spirit of the age,&rdquo; she asserted.</p>
<p>&ldquo;&ldquo;Do you mean by that, contrary to the Machine?&rdquo;&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Vashanti&rdquo;s next move was to turn off the isolation switch, and all the accumulations of the last three minutes burst upon her. The room was filled with the noise of bells, and speaking-tubes. What was the new food like? Could she recommend it? Has she had any ideas lately? Might one tell her one&rdquo;s own ideas? Would she make an engagement to visit the public nurseries at an early date? − say this day month.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>Forster quite accurately predicts what it must be like for an average social-media user to &ldquo;come back&rdquo; to their phone after a temporary absence.</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The clumsy system of public gatherings had been long since abandoned; neither Vashti nor her audience stirred from their rooms. Seated in her armchair she spoke, while they in their armchairs heard her, fairly well, and saw her, fairly well.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>He also managed to predict the COVID-19 remote culture, as well. In our modern case, it applies only to the upper-level caste, while lower castes continue to work. In Forster&rsquo;s vision, the &ldquo;Machine&rdquo; took care of day-to-day minutia.</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Her lecture, which lasted ten minutes, was well received, and at its conclusion she and many of her audience listened to a lecture on the sea; there were ideas to be got from the sea; the speaker had donned a respirator and visited it lately.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>In this next section, Forster somehow manages to capture the superficiality of TED Talks nearly a century before they even existed.</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;And of course she had studied the civilization that had immediately preceded her own − the civilization that had mistaken the functions of the system, and had used it for bringing people to things, instead of for bringing things to people.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>Amazon and deliveries also accurately predicted.</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Few travelled in these days, for, thanks to the advance of science, the earth was exactly alike all over. Rapid intercourse, from which the previous civilization had hoped so much, had ended by defeating itself. What was the good of going to Peking when it was just like Shrewsbury? Why return to Shrewsbury when it would all be like Peking?&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>Globalization as well.</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The arrangements were old- fashioned and rough. There was even a female attendant, to whom she would have to announce her wants during the voyage. Of course a revolving platform ran the length of the boat, but she was expected to walk from it to her cabin. Some cabins were better than others, and she did not get the best. She thought the attendant had been unfair, and spasms of rage shook her.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>The utter depravity and egotism of the privileged.</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;In the dawn of the world our weakly (sic?) must be exposed on Mount Taygetus, in its twilight our strong will suffer euthanasia, that the Machine may progress, that the Machine may progress, that the Machine may progress eternally.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;And even the lecturers acquiesced when they found that a lecture on the sea was none the less stimulating when compiled out of other lectures that had already been delivered on the same subject. &ldquo;Beware of first- hand ideas!&rdquo; exclaimed one of the most advanced of them. &ldquo;First-hand ideas do not really exist. They are but the physical impressions produced by live and fear, and on this gross foundation who could erect a philosophy? Let your ideas be second-hand, and if possible tenth-hand, for then they will be far removed from that disturbing element − direct observation. Do not learn anything about this subject of mine − the French Revolution. Learn instead what I think that Enicharmon thought Urizen thought Gutch thought Ho-Yung thought Chi-Bo-Sing thought LafcadioHearn thought Carlyle thought Mirabeau said about the French Revolution.</p>
<p>&ldquo;[…]</p>
<p>&ldquo;You who listen to me are in a better position to judge about the French Revolution than I am. Your descendants will be even in a better position than you, for they will learn what you think I think, and yet another intermediate will be added to the chain. And in time&rdquo; − his voice rose − &ldquo;there will come a generation that had got beyond facts, beyond impressions, a generation absolutely colourless, a generation seraphically free From taint of personality, which will see the French Revolution not as it happened, nor as they would like it to have happened, but as it would have happened, had it taken place in the days of the Machine.&rdquo;&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Time passed, and they resented the defects no longer. The defects had not been remedied, but the human tissues in that latter day had become so subservient, that they readily adapted themselves to every caprice of the Machine. The sigh at the crises of the Brisbane symphony no longer irritated Vashti; she accepted it as part of the melody. The jarring noise, whether in the head or in the wall, was no longer resented by her friend. And so with the mouldy artificial fruit, so with the bath water that began to stink, so with the defective rhymes that the poetry machine had taken to emit. all were bitterly complained of at first, and then acquiesced in and forgotten. Things went from bad to worse unchallenged.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>And so we are with our unquestioning and unknowing acceptance of whatever our technology masters grant us.</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;But there came a day when, without the slightest warning, without any previous hint of feebleness, the entire communication-system broke down, all over the world, and the world, as they understood it, ended.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>And so would it be for us, should a similar cataclysm consign us to blindness and incommunication. I, for one, would be left with only the handful of books left on my E-Book reader, should that even continue to work. Perhaps I could continue programming or writing. I still have movies and series to watch that I have secured on local storage.</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;As he spoke, the whole city was broken like a honeycomb. An air-ship had sailed in through the vomitory into a ruined wharf. It crashed downwards, exploding as it went, rending gallery after gallery with its wings of steel. For a moment they saw the nations of the dead, and, before they joined them, scraps of the untainted sky.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Man, the flower of all flesh, the noblest of all creatures visible, man who had once made god in his image, and had mirrored his strength on the constellations, beautiful naked man was dying, strangled in the garments that he had woven.&rdquo;</div></blockquote>      </div>
      </div>
        <div class="footer">
    <div class="footer-data"><div class="footer-links"><ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/contact.php" title="">Contact</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/support.php" title="">Support</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/privacy.php" title="">Privacy</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/rights.php" title="">Rights</a></li></ul></div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="copyright">Copyright (c) 1999-2026 earthli.com. All Rights Reserved.</div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="versions">Powered by <ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore/app_news.php">earthli News 3.7</a></li><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore" title="">earthli WebCore&trade; 3.7</a></li></ul></div></div>    </div>
      </div>
  </div>  </body>
</html>
]]>
  </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
      <title type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[The Scarlet Plague by Jack London (1915, read in 2020)]]>
  </title>
    <id>https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3980</id>
    <link href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3980"/>
    <updated>2020-05-21T12:20:38+02:00</updated>
    <author>
        <name type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[Marco von Ballmoos]]>
  </name>
      <uri>https://earthli.com/users/marco</uri>
    </author>
      <summary type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<blockquote class="quote abstract "><div>Disclaimer: these are notes I took while reading this book. They include citations I found interesting or enlightening or particularly well-written. In some cases, I&rsquo;ve pointed out which of these applies to which citation; in others, I have not. Any benefit you gain from reading these notes is... [<a class="complete-text-link" href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3980">More</a>]</div></blockquote>]]>
  </summary>
      <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<html lang="en">
  <head>
    <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/themes/ice.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/fonts/raleway.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/core/medium.css">
  </head>
  <body>
<div class="style-controls">  <div class="page">
    <div class="page-body">
<div class="info-box-top">
<p>
Published by <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_user.php?name=marco" title="Marco von Ballmoos" class="visible">marco</a> on <span class="date-time">21. May 2020 12:20:38 (GMT-5)</span>
</p>
</div>
      <div class="text-flow wide">
  <blockquote class="quote abstract "><div>Disclaimer: these are notes I took while reading this book. They include citations I found interesting or enlightening or particularly well-written. In some cases, I&rsquo;ve pointed out which of these applies to which citation; in others, I have not. Any benefit you gain from reading these notes is purely incidental to the purpose they serve of reminding me what I once read. Please see Wikipedia for a summary if I&rsquo;ve failed to provide one sufficient for your purposes. If my notes serve to trigger an interest in this book, then I&rsquo;m happy for you.</div></blockquote><p>This is a short story told by the survivor of a great plague that destroyed mankind. The plague happened in 2013 (making it a speculative fiction/science-fiction tale in 1915) and the tale is told sixty years later by Granser—a former professor of English—to his grandsons—unutterably crude savages who are, to be fair, much better-suited to the world in which they all find themselves than Granser with his university education.</p>
<p>The disease was called the Scarlet Plague because of its distinguishing initial symptom—a reddening of the face that foretold a death within hours. After that, sufferers first lost all feeling in their feet, a numbness that crept upward over the next few hours until it seized and stopped their hearts. Death was unavoidable. The only survivors were immune from the start—and those numbered fewer than one in a million. The disease incubated for several days before manifesting itself and killing its victim, allowing a ferocious spread with a shockingly high R-value.</p>
<p>The disease did not discriminate based on skill or knowledge—it tore an irreparable swath through mankind until the entire population of the western and former United States numbered only a few hundred people 3 generations later. Granser speculates that there are no other people left on Earth, but he has no way of knowing. Without technology, without electricity…the world is once again much, much larger than it was.</p>
<p>The grandsons are a mixed bag: Edwin seems the most willing to listen to and try to learn from Granser while Hoo-hoo and especially Hare-Lip are nearly demented idiots bent only on dominating their mean and small environs. Even when they seem to listen to and take Granser&rsquo;s advice, they pervert it through the lens of the here-and-now and lose his message entirely.</p>
<p>London discusses the so-called impedance mismatch between his culture and theirs—separated by only a few decades but yielding an already hopelessly unbridgeable gulf. They understand little of what he says unless he breaks it down to their guttural and severely limited patois that comprises only the concepts necessary for survival. This is understandable on their part, but bespeaks the doom of any plan to retain the knowledge that mankind once had.</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;<strong>Granser:</strong> You must tell them that when water is made hot by fire, there resides in it a wonderful thing called steam, which is stronger than ten thousand men and which can do all man&rsquo;s work for him.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>The story briefly describes the state of mankind and the world after the plague, but it primarily tells of the coming of the plague and the ensuing fall of all of man&rsquo;s works. With a plague so deadly, there was no gradual loss of knowledge or services, no time to prepare backup plans or storehouses of either supplies or knowledge.</p>
<p>Granser tells of his travels and long loneliness before he discovered his first people—a couple composed of Chauffeur and Vesta Van Warden. He is a large, mean, and terrible man who has her as a house drudge, brood sow, and chattel. She is the descendant of the former rulers of the world. In the post-plague world, their roles are reversed. His physical brutishness grants him power over here, where once the brutishness of societal convention conferred upon her a power inordinate to her physical or intellectual capability. It is unclear to what degree London shares Granser&rsquo;s adulation of this former nobility/royalty—I can&rsquo;t tell if he&rsquo;s being ironic.</p>
<p>At any rate, mankind bred itself to about 400 crude and fallen people 60 years after the onset of the plague, with little to no hope that they would at any point be able to make use of the storehouse of books and knowledge that Granser had set aside for them in a cave. It is his life&rsquo;s work, but, being in his late 80s, his life is coming to an end, with no hope in sight that anyone will be able to retain anything of what he would have been able to impart from his knowledge of a world that once was.</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;All man&rsquo;s toil upon the planet was just so much foam. He domesticated the serviceable animals, destroyed the hostile ones, and cleared the land of its wild vegetation. And then he passed, and the flood of primordial life rolled back again, sweeping his handiwork away&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>Instead, the tribes listen to medicine men who send around &ldquo;death sticks&rdquo; and other superstitious tripe. Mankind will leave the Earth in a sort of peace and will need dozens of thousands of millennia to re-learn what it once knew, step by painful step.</p>
<p>Or maybe mankind won&rsquo;t be so lucky and will instead be eaten by the mountain lions that are making their way down, closer and closer to the ocean, as intimated right at the end by Edwin&rsquo;s observation that the wild horses had come down out of the mountains to escape their predators.</p>
<p>Here London leaves us with a 50/50: is Edwin&rsquo;s  observation about the horses combined with a greater willingness to learn from Granser a sign that he is sharp enough to quantum-leap his tribe back to a semblance of civilization? Or are the mountain lions a metaphor for the inexorable voracity of an unpitying nature that will finish the job that the Scarlet Plague started?</p>
<p>London&rsquo;s vision is somewhat limited by his having written in 1915: He writes of the rich in their dirigibles and advanced motorcars and mansions; he doesn&rsquo;t envision anything fancier than canned goods for foodstuffs. He is also unavoidably a man of his eugenic times. He writes of the &ldquo;laborers&rdquo;,</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;In the midst of our civilization, down in our slums and labor-ghettos, we had bred a race of barbarians, of savages; and now, in the time of our calamity, they turned upon us like the wild beasts they were and destroyed us. And they destroyed themselves as well.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>In 2020, that&rsquo;s on its face quite shockingly racist, but it&rsquo;s perhaps only more overt than the castes we retain today. Though we purport to have eliminated them, they survive in the sinews and veins of our society, more dangerous and powerful because they are so internalized that too few even question them. The argument today is the same, though delivered with perhaps more subtle casuistry. So-called American civilization today bases largely on the notion that the rich are rich because they deserve it; the poor as well.</p>
<p>Also, as noted above, it&rsquo;s not clear how London personally felt about that line of argument (or whether he&rsquo;s promoting anything at all). In an earlier passage, he wrote the following, which seems quite a bit more critical of the way his world worked (and, quite honestly, how ours still does),</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Our food-getters were called freemen. This was a joke. We of the ruling classes owned all the land, all the machines, everything. These food-getters were our slaves. We took almost all the food they got, and left them a little so that they might eat, and work, and get us more food […]&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>I was impressed by London&rsquo;s mastery. It was a damned good story—I had no idea he counted among the best of the fantasy writers. The plague of 1917/1918 followed on the heels of his having published this story, which makes him eerily prescient, to boot.</p>
<h2>Citations</h2><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The boy did not exactly utter these words, but something that remotely resembled them and that was more guttural and explosive and economical of qualifying phrases. His speech showed distant kinship with that of the old man, and the latter&rsquo;s speech was approximately an English that had gone through a bath of corrupt usage. “What I want to know,” Edwin continued, “is why you call crab &lsquo;toothsome delicacy&rsquo;? Crab is crab, ain&rsquo;t it? No one I never heard calls it such funny things.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 7</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Four million people lived in San Francisco then. And now, in the whole city and county there aren&rsquo;t forty all told. And out there on the sea were ships and ships always to be seen, going in for the Golden Gate or coming out. And airships in the air—dirigibles and flying machines. They could travel two hundred miles an hour.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 10</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The old man babbled on, unheeded by the boys, who were long accustomed to his garrulousness, and whose vocabularies, besides, lacked the greater portion of the words he used.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 10</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;All man&rsquo;s toil upon the planet was just so much foam. He domesticated the serviceable animals, destroyed the hostile ones, and cleared the land of its wild vegetation. And then he passed, and the flood of primordial life rolled back again, sweeping his handiwork away&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 11</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The human race is doomed to sink back farther and farther into the primitive night ere again it begins its bloody climb upward to civilization. When we increase and feel the lack of room, we will proceed to kill one another.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 13</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Our food-getters were called freemen. This was a joke. We of the ruling classes owned all the land, all the machines, everything. These food-getters were our slaves. We took almost all the food they got, and left them a little so that they might eat, and work, and get us more food […]&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 17</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;“To all of this I agreed, staying in my house and for the first time in my life attempting to cook. And the plague did not come out on me. By means of the telephone I could talk with whomsoever I pleased and get the news. Also, there were the newspapers, and I ordered all of them to be thrown up to my door so that I could know what was happening with the rest of the world.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 27</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;For sixty years that world has no longer existed for me. I know there must be such places as New York, Europe, Asia, and Africa; but not one word has been heard of them—not in sixty years. With the coming of the Scarlet Death the world fell apart, absolutely, irretrievably. Ten thousand years of culture and civilization passed in the twinkling of an eye, &lsquo;lapsed like foam.&rsquo;&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 29</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;I saw one of the robbers break the windows of the adjoining store, a place where shoes were sold, and deliberately set fire to it. I did not go to the groceryman&rsquo;s assistance. The time for such acts had already passed. Civilization was crumbling, and it was each for himself.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 32</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;In the midst of our civilization, down in our slums and labor-ghettos, we had bred a race of barbarians, of savages; and now, in the time of our calamity, they turned upon us like the wild beasts they were and destroyed us. And they destroyed themselves as well.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 33</div></div><p>Jesus, that&rsquo;s pretty racist, but perhaps only more overt than the castes we retain today. The argument today is the same, though delivered with perhaps more subtle casuistry.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;“He was a violent, unjust man. Why the plague germs spared him I can never understand. It would seem, in spite of our old metaphysical notions about absolute justice, that there is no justice in the universe. Why did he live?—an iniquitous, moral monster, a blot on the face of nature, a cruel, relentless, bestial cheat as well. All he could talk about was motor cars, machinery, gasoline, and garages—and especially, and with huge delight, of his mean pilferings and sordid swindlings of the persons who had employed him in the days before the coming of the plague. And yet he was spared, while hundreds of millions, yea, billions, of better men were destroyed.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 46</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;She was a lord of life, both by birth and by marriage. The destinies of millions, such as he, she carried in the hollow of her pink-white hand. And, in the days before the plague, the slightest contact with such as he would have been pollution. Oh, I have seen it. Once, I remember, there was Mrs. Goldwin, wife of one of the great magnates. It was on a landing stage, just as she was embarking in her private dirigible, that she dropped her parasol. A servant picked it up and made the mistake of handing it to her—to her, one of the greatest royal ladies of the land! She shrank back, as though he were a leper, and indicated her secretary to receive it. Also, she ordered her secretary to ascertain the creature&rsquo;s name and to see that he was immediately discharged from service. And such a woman was Vesta Van Warden. And her the Chauffeur beat and made his slave.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 48</div></div><p>I honestly can&rsquo;t tell if he&rsquo;s for or against.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;In time, pressure of population will compel us to spread out, and a hundred generations from now we may expect our descendants to start across the Sierras, oozing slowly along, generation by generation, over the great continent to the colonization of the East—a new Aryan drift around the world. “But it will be slow, very slow; we have so far to climb. We fell so hopelessly far. If only one physicist or one chemist had survived! But it was not to be, and we have forgotten everything. The Chauffeur started working in iron. He made the forge which we use to this day. But he was a lazy man, and when he died he took with him all he knew of metals and machinery. What was I to know of such things? I was a classical scholar, not a chemist.. The other men who survived were not educated.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 53</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;But you, Hare-Lip, so deeply are you sunk in black superstition that did you awake this night and find the death-stick beside you, you would surely die. And you would die, not because of any virtues in the stick, but because you are a savage with the dark and clouded mind of a savage.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 54</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;I repeat unto you certain things which you must remember and tell to your children after you. You must tell them that when water is made hot by fire, there resides in it a wonderful thing called steam, which is stronger than ten thousand men and which can do all man&rsquo;s work for him. There are other very useful things. In the lightning flash resides a similarly strong servant of man, which was of old his slave and which some day will be his slave again.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 55</div></div>      </div>
      </div>
        <div class="footer">
    <div class="footer-data"><div class="footer-links"><ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/contact.php" title="">Contact</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/support.php" title="">Support</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/privacy.php" title="">Privacy</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/rights.php" title="">Rights</a></li></ul></div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="copyright">Copyright (c) 1999-2026 earthli.com. All Rights Reserved.</div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="versions">Powered by <ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore/app_news.php">earthli News 3.7</a></li><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore" title="">earthli WebCore&trade; 3.7</a></li></ul></div></div>    </div>
      </div>
  </div>  </body>
</html>
]]>
  </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
      <title type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[The Long Emergency: Surviving the End of Oil, Climate Change, andOther Conv...s of the Twenty-first Century by James Howard Kunstler (2005, read in 2020)]]>
  </title>
    <id>https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3938</id>
    <link href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3938"/>
    <updated>2020-05-10T22:32:09+02:00</updated>
    <author>
        <name type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[Marco von Ballmoos]]>
  </name>
      <uri>https://earthli.com/users/marco</uri>
    </author>
      <summary type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<blockquote class="quote abstract "><div>Disclaimer: these are notes I took while reading this book. They include citations I found interesting or enlightening or particularly well-written. In some cases, I&rsquo;ve pointed out which of these applies to which citation; in others, I have not. Any benefit you gain from reading these notes is... [<a class="complete-text-link" href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3938">More</a>]</div></blockquote>]]>
  </summary>
      <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<html lang="en">
  <head>
    <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/themes/ice.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/fonts/raleway.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/core/medium.css">
  </head>
  <body>
<div class="style-controls">  <div class="page">
    <div class="page-body">
<div class="info-box-top">
<p>
Published by <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_user.php?name=marco" title="Marco von Ballmoos" class="visible">marco</a> on <span class="date-time">10. May 2020 22:32:09 (GMT-5)</span>
</p>
</div>
      <div class="text-flow wide">
  <blockquote class="quote abstract "><div>Disclaimer: these are notes I took while reading this book. They include citations I found interesting or enlightening or particularly well-written. In some cases, I&rsquo;ve pointed out which of these applies to which citation; in others, I have not. Any benefit you gain from reading these notes is purely incidental to the purpose they serve of reminding me what I once read. Please see Wikipedia for a summary if I&rsquo;ve failed to provide one sufficient for your purposes. If my notes serve to trigger an interest in this book, then I&rsquo;m happy for you.</div></blockquote><p>This is a non-fiction book-length discussion of the end of oil—and the massive impact this will have on a society nearly completely predicated on cheap, non-renewable energy produced over millions of years. It ranges wide and far and includes intelligent and well-written analyses of all of the parts of our world that will have to change—whether we want them to or not. He discusses car culture, suburbs, poorly designed societies, climate change, big finance, the mortgage collapse (before it happened),  pandemics (before it happened in the west), and much, much more.</p>
<p>The book starts with a bleak but accurate assessment of American society—from hyper-consumerism to happy motoring to ex-ex-exurbs. It continues with a discussion of what oil is and where it comes from—oil in particular because its the most flexible of the various energy sources currently available to us—and even of others that we can currently conceive of.</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Oil is an amazing substance. It stores a tremendous amount of energy per weight and volume. It is easy to transport. It stores easily at regular air temperature in unpressurized metal tanks, and it can sit there indefinitely without degrading. You can pump it through a pipe, you can send it all over the world in ships, you can haul it around in trains, cars, and trucks, you can even fly it in tanker planes and refuel other airplanes in flight […]&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>The book is split into section after prophetic section, discussing how nearly everything in our modern society is possible thanks to the high-density energy of cheap fossil fuels. The United States depends on natural gas for heating and producing many of its resources—including nearly all of the fertilizer without which not a single crop would grow.</p>
<p>Kunstler defines what Peak Oil actually means: it&rsquo;s the point at which the world has used up half of the oil supply in the world. He points out that the half we&rsquo;ve used is also very much the more easily obtained half—and that much of the second half won&rsquo;t be able to be obtained at all. It won&rsquo;t be worth it, not only economically, but in the more prosaic and realistic measure of how much energy it would take to extract it. While the energy needed to harvest fossil fuels used to be a couple of dozen to one, we&rsquo;re now lucky to get two or three to one.</p>
<p>The U.S. hit peak oil nearly 45 years ago now; it has never again produced as much oil as it did then. It has also long since hit peak natural-gas. Kunstler wrote his book before shale-oil and fracking took off, but he predicted it perfectly. That the US went for shale oil and fracking is <em>indicative</em> that we&rsquo;ve hit Peak Oil. Otherwise, no-one would ever have developed such an invasive extraction technology with such poor yields and margins.</p>
<p>There are still those who claim that Peak Oil doesn&rsquo;t matter—they try to explain it away as peak consumption rather than peak production, but that&rsquo;s ridiculous. It&rsquo;s like someone who loses their job saying that there&rsquo;s no problem with losing their salary. When you meet them a month later, they say they&rsquo;re doing fine: they&rsquo;ve started robbing houses instead.</p>
<p>With most of the world having passed the peak, there&rsquo;s no longer a way of controlling the price of oil because no-one has excess capacity to throw at the market to bring prices back down. That explains the whipsawing of prices over the years. Kunstler also predicted the fragility of fracking—witness the complete implosion of the industry after oil prices cratered due to the world self-isolating for Covid-19.</p>
<p>He doesn&rsquo;t talk about just oil, though. He also writes about climate change…and pandemics, another thing that could easily trigger the Long Emergency.</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;At the same time, the world is overdue for an extreme influenza epidemic. The last major outbreak was the 1918 Spanish influenza, which killed 50 million people worldwide and changed the course of history. […] Disease will certainly play a larger role in the Long Emergency than many can now imagine. An epidemic could paralyze social and economic systems, interrupt global trade, and bring down governments.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>Perhaps it wasn&rsquo;t such a leap to predict something like this—Kunstler was certainly not alone in doing so—but the timing was just right for reading this book. He&rsquo;s really a very gifted writer, weaving a convincing, if sobering, picture of the future of humanity,</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Our ability to resist the environmental corrective of disease will probably prove to have been another temporary boon of the cheap-oil age, like air conditioning and lobsters flown daily from Maine to the buffets of Las Vegas. So much of what we construe to be among our entitlements to perpetual progress may prove to have been a strange, marvelous, and anomalous moment in the planet’s history.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>He weaves similarly evocative pictures of just how impossible our world currently is—especially when you realize that the free-energy bonanza on which it rests is winding down.</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Products then moved around the globe in a highly rationalized system, not unlike the oil allocation system, using immense vessels, automated port facilities, and truck-scaled shipping containers at a minuscule cost-per-unit of whatever was made and transported. Shirts or coffeemakers manufactured 12,000 miles away could be shipped to Wal-Marts all over America and sold cheaply.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>He points out that so many economic miracles and turnarounds were almost always due to a newly found bonanza of oil or natural gas. For example, England&rsquo;s turnaround in the 80s wasn&rsquo;t because  of Thatcher&rsquo;s economic acumen, but purely because they&rsquo;d just come into an embarrassment of riches in the North Sea.</p>
<p>His holistic vision encompasses also the financialization of global economics, describing the fire sale of an industrialized society built on fossil fuels as <span class="quote-inline">&ldquo;like a convoluted liquidation sale of the accrued wealth of two hundred years of industrial society for the benefit of a handful of financial buccaneers,&rdquo;</span></p>
<p>He&rsquo;s much more familiar with his home country and takes them especially to task as being utterly unable to think for themselves. </p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;In effect, Americans threw away their communities in order to save a few dollars on hair dryers and plastic food storage tubs, never stopping to reflect on what they were destroying.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>The world  shows itself ideologically incapable of even considering the obvious conclusions based on available data. Instead, faith in the ever-providing markets is the order of the day.</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Because the oil peak phenomenon essentially cancels out further industrial growth of the kind we are used to, its implications lie radically outside their economic paradigm. So the oil peak phenomenon has been discounted to about zero among conventional economists, who assume that “market signals” about oil supplies will inevitably trigger innovation, which, in turn, will cause new technology to materialize and enable further growth.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>The problem is more acute in the U.S., which has taken an oil-drenched lifestyle to an unparalleled extreme. Other advanced societies are also dependent on oil, but it&rsquo;s still easily possible to live a life even with reduced fossil-fuel supplies. That is, the cities are still livable and can be navigated by foot, bicycle or public transportation, food is produced reasonably sustainably and locally (e.g. without natural-gas-based fertilizers, because <span class="quote-inline">&ldquo;[n]inety-five percent of the nitrogenous fertilizers used in America are made out of natural gas&rdquo;</span>). Not so in the U.S. Just as an example, Kunstler writes that by 1974 <span class="quote-inline">&ldquo;85 percent of Americans drove to work every day.&rdquo;</span> and that <span class="quote-inline">&ldquo;[b]y the 1990s, American households were making a record eleven separate car trips a day running errands and chauffeuring children around.&rdquo;</span></p>
<p>The U.S. is in deep trouble, much deeper than other places. This is also due to a complete political paralysis and fear of telling the truth or even of acknowledging reality.</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;No politician wants to tell voters that the American Dream has been canceled for a lack of energy resources. The U.S. economy would disintegrate. So, whichever party is in power has tended to ignore the issue or change the subject, or spin it into the realm of delusion&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>Kunstler stumbles in two areas: The first is foreign policy in the Middle East in the 70s and 80s, where his lens is still too U.S.-centric, as hard as that is to believe. The other is the short chapter on racism, where he&rsquo;s got some decent points to make, but still ends up making them as a boorish, victim-blaming old white guy who doesn&rsquo;t quite believe in systemic racism.</p>
<p>For example, he describes the 21st-century war on Islam as <span class="quote-inline">&ldquo;[w]e are therefore at war with that community—not because of our choosing but because it has declared war on us.&rdquo;</span> It&rsquo;s understood that the book was written only a few years after 9/11, but it&rsquo;s not like that was the first act of war—Kunstler could have mentioned something along those lines.</p>
<p>Just as another example, here&rsquo;s how he wrote about the WMD inspections in Iraq:</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Since the UN team was prevented from completing the search, the United States had to do it in person. The fact that nothing was found by American forces after the 2003 invasion does not prove that we didn’t have to look.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>He fails to note that this is because vassal nations must be brought to heel and occupation is the punishment/answer. The logic is so internalized. </p>
<p>Kunstler is at his best when he&rsquo;s calmly expounding on his main thesis: We are shredding through millions of years of stored non-renewable energy in a couple of centuries. The society we built with it is utterly unsustainable when that energy is no longer available in that form.</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Natural hydrocarbons represent millennia of stored solar power collected by plants and distilled by geologic accident. The flare given off by igniting an ounce of charcoal starter lasts a few seconds, but the energy was derived from, say, a prehistoric tree fern absorbing sunshine for nine years.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Also, once these complex systems and their subsystems halt their operations, restarting them may range from difficult to impossible—the Humpty Dumpty syndrome.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>At the time the book was written, fuel cells were all the rage, in particular fuel-cell cars. In the ensuing 15 years, we&rsquo;ve instead seen the rise of the electric car—Kunstler&rsquo;s devastating critique of the lack of viability of building cars at all—rescuing the <em>happy motoring culture</em> without the fossil fuels—applies just as well to electric cars. He described Tesla 10 years before it even produced a single car.</p>
<p>As Kunstler points out, a lot of the cures for the end of cheap energy are based on still having access to that cheap energy. This will be the case, even after peak oil or peak natural-gas, for quite some time. That is, there is a certain (limited) supply of still-cheap energy with which we could possibly transition to something that no longer requires us to have access to cheap-energy stores—or at least we should have access to renewable cheap-energy stores. Unfortunately, as long as we have the cheap supply, we continue to spend it uselessly, on frivolities, rather than <em>investing</em> it on a bridge to a more sustainable future.</p>
<p>There is a fantastic section where Kunstler explains the history of the U.S. from the 1970s until 2004 purely in terms of drivers based on the need for oil. And oil it has to be, because of the properties outlined above: it&rsquo;s very portable. As Kunstler points out, nuclear fission can&rsquo;t solve many of society&rsquo;s needs because <span class="quote-inline">&ldquo;most of America’s energy needs are for things that electricity can’t do very well, if at all&rdquo;</span>.</p>
<p>Unlike other visions of the future (e.g. Hariri&rsquo;s book), Kunstler addresses climate change seriously and in-depth. He discusses the different regions of the U.S., dissecting the problems each region faces and the degree to which it could survive a long emergency. Kunstler&rsquo;s region in the Northeast would survive the best. The Southwest, with its utter lack of arable land and water, would fare the worst. It would have to be abandoned in any halfway-realistic scenario.</p>
<p>As already noted above, Kunstler sees quite well that a potential trigger for the Long Emergency could be virus. Reading this book now really makes you think whether the U.S. has been accelerated into a stage of the Long Emergency that the rest of the world has been able to avoid (for now). Kunstler writes,</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;It takes seven months or more to create, test, manufacture, and distribute a vaccine developed in direct response to a new virus, and by that time the disease can burn through global populations. If a pandemic broke out today, hospital facilities would be overwhelmed. Nurses and doctors would be infected along with the rest of the population.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>Kunstler puts the nail in America&rsquo;s coffin by noting—again—that the U.S. is <em>ideologically incapable</em> of doing anything about any of the myriad problems it has created for itself. The U.S. also has made many problems for itself that the nearly all of the rest of its contemporaries have avoided (excluding the UK, which at least has an NHS, despite its attempts to dismantle it).</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;[…] we in America flatter ourselves to think that we are above this kind of general catastrophe—because our technologic prowess during the cheap-oil fiesta was so marvelous that all future problems are (supposedly) guaranteed to be solved by similar applications of ingenuity</p>
<p>&ldquo;[…]</p>
<p>&ldquo;Americans didn’t question the validity of the suburban sprawl economy. They accepted it at face value as the obvious logical outcome of their hopes and dreams and defended it viciously against criticism. They steadfastly ignored its salient characteristic: that it had no future either as an economy or as a living arrangement. Each further elaboration of the suburban system made it less likely to survive any change in conditions,&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote><p>Other countries think this, to some degree, but not nearly the degree to which the U.S. does. They were at least smart enough to make backup plans. For example, many European countries retain a dense, <em>largely electrical</em>, rail network that they use for at least 50% of their freight—and which could be ramped up to replace the capacity lost when trucks are no longer able to get enough fuel or the roads can no longer be sufficiently maintained. Kunstler writes, <span class="quote-inline">&ldquo;it’s worth reiterating that a failure to get comprehensive passenger rail service going will be a sign of how fundamentally unserious we are as a society.&rdquo;</span></p>
<p>And what is the main driver of the world&rsquo;s problems? Big finance, big corporations, globalization, the complete disavowal of national allegiance by society&rsquo;s biggest members.</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Globalism was operated by oligarchical corporations on the gigantic scale, made possible by cheap oil. By “oligarchical” I mean that power was vested in small numbers of people running large organizations who were not accountable for their actions to many of the people who were subject to those actions. <strong>By “corporation,” I mean a group enterprise given the legal status of a “person,” with “rights,” but in fact devoid of any human qualities of ethics, humility, mercy, duty, or loyalty that would constrain those rights.</strong> (Emphasis added.)&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>We see this playing out right now with corporations in not just the U.S. (e.g. German car manufacturers) are vacuuming up bailout money despite not having paid taxes in their supposed home countries for years. A particularly egregious example is Carnival Cruise Lines, which sees fit to incorporate in Panama, but chirpily takes bailout money, all the while promulgating a business model that hasn&rsquo;t a chance in hell of working in a post-Covid-19 world.</p>
<p>Kunstler points out the moral bankruptcy of the conceit that a corporation like Wal-Mart simply &ldquo;competes&rdquo; with local businesses on an even footing.</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;Wal-Mart was considered the theoretical equal of Bob the appliance store owner, and if Bob happened to lose in the retail competition because he couldn’t order 50,000 coffee-makers at a crack from a factory 12,000 miles away in Hangzhou, and receive a deep discount for being such an important customer, well, it wasn’t as though he hadn’t been given the chance.</p>
<p>&ldquo;[…]</p>
<p>&ldquo;One group had all the cheap labor and another group had all the capital, and for a while one group made all the things that the other group “consumed.” Thus, comparative advantage became, for a time, a con game strictly for the benefit of large corporations, which ended up enjoying all the advantages while the localities sucked up the costs.&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote><p>On the back on this kind of feedback loop that benefitted the right people, more and more of the privileged—the elite—would take part in an orgy of investment that had nothing to with any useful economic activity.</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Finance came to be viewed as a productive activity itself rather than a means to promote production. The public was no longer buying stock to invest in enterprises that would pay dividends over time, but merely because one could get rich from buying and selling stocks.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>Not only that, but whatever real economy (e.g. manufacturing and agriculture) wasn&rsquo;t replaced with finance was then replaced with a &ldquo;service industry&rdquo; instead.</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;[…] the myth of a service economy to replace the old manufacturing economy. I say “myth” because it was essentially absurd. It was like the old joke about the village that prospered because the inhabitants were all employed taking in each other’s laundry.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>On that backs of all of these poor decisions, Kunstler saw the housing/mortgage crisis coming in 2004 already. He wasn&rsquo;t alone—many other non-mainstream economists, like Dean Baker, did as well—but it&rsquo;s to his credit that he saw it then, and wrote so eloquently and presciently on the shape it would take. E.g. <span class="quote-inline">&ldquo;By the time you read this, it is very likely that the housing bubble will have begun to come to grief.&rdquo;</span> I read that sentence a dozen years after the housing bubble had unequivocally triggered the largest world global financial crisis the world had even seen. It remains to be seen whether the global stagnation engendered by Covid-19 measures tops it.</p>
<p>This is all to say that the U.S. is basically running the world in a fashion that doesn&rsquo;t accept limits—it simply ignores them, even when obviously imposed by physics. This is a fantasy world sustained only temporarily by cheap oil. This basic attitude affects <em>everything</em>….and negatively. As long as enough of the people that matter believe this fantasy—or profit from it—then it will continue, by pure inertia. It will only stop when it finally hits a hard limit. And that limit will not be kind, it will not be gentle. Thus ensues the Long Emergency.</p>
<h2>Citations</h2><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;It is my view, for instance, that in the decades to come the national government will prove to be so impotent and ineffective in managing the enormous vicissitudes we face that the United States may not survive as a nation in any meaningful sense but rather will devolve into a set of autonomous regions.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 93-96</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;So, I hazard to assert that as oil ceases to be cheap and the world reserves arc toward depletion, we will indeed suddenly be left with an enormous surplus population—with apologies to both Charles Dickens and Jonathan Swift—that the ecology of the earth will not support. No political program of birth control will avail. The people are already here. The journey back to non-oil population homeostasis will not be pretty. We will discover the hard way that population hypergrowth was simply a side effect of the oil age.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 200-203</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;At the same time, the world is overdue for an extreme influenza epidemic. The last major outbreak was the 1918 Spanish influenza, which killed 50 million people worldwide and changed the course of history.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 256-258</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Disease will certainly play a larger role in the Long Emergency than many can now imagine. An epidemic could paralyze social and economic systems, interrupt global trade, and bring down governments.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 260-261</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;At the very least, the Long Emergency will be a time of diminished life spans for many of us, as well as reduced standards of living—at least as understood within the current social context. Fossil fuels had the effect of temporarily raising the carrying capacity of the earth. Our ability to resist the environmental corrective of disease will probably prove to have been another temporary boon of the cheap-oil age, like air conditioning and lobsters flown daily from Maine to the buffets of Las Vegas. So much of what we construe to be among our entitlements to perpetual progress may prove to have been a strange, marvelous, and anomalous moment in the planet’s history.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 266-272</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Factories could be started up in Sri Lanka and Malaysia, where swollen populations furnished trainable workers willing to labor for much less than those back in the United States or Europe. Products then moved around the globe in a highly rationalized system, not unlike the oil allocation system, using immense vessels, automated port facilities, and truck-scaled shipping containers at a minuscule cost-per-unit of whatever was made and transported. Shirts or coffeemakers manufactured 12,000 miles away could be shipped to Wal-Marts all over America and sold cheaply.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 278-283</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Meanwhile, among economists and government figures, globalism developed the sexy glow of an intellectual fad. Globalism allowed them to believe that burgeoning wealth in the developed countries, and the spread of industrial activity to formerly primitive regions, was based on the potency of their own ideas and policies rather than on cheap oil.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 292-295</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Thatcher’s success in reviving England coincided with a fantastic new revenue stream from North Sea oil,&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 296-297</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The rise of computers, in turn, promoted the fantasy that commerce in sheer information would be the long-sought replacement for all the played-out activities of the smokestack economy. A country like America, it was now thought, no longer needed steelmaking or tire factories or other harsh, dirty, troublesome enterprises. Let the poor masses of Asia and South America have them and lift themselves up from agricultural peonage. America would outsource all this old economy stuff and use computers to orchestrate the movement of parts and the assembly of products from distant quarters of the world, and then sell the stuff in our own Kmarts and Wal-Marts, which would become global juggernauts of retailing.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 304-309</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;It was also like a convoluted liquidation sale of the accrued wealth of two hundred years of industrial society for the benefit of a handful of financial buccaneers,&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 330-331</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;That this development was uniformly greeted as a public good by the vast majority of Americans, at the same time that their local economies were being destroyed—and with them, myriad social and civic benefits—is one of the greater enigmas of recent social history. In effect, Americans threw away their communities in order to save a few dollars on hair dryers and plastic food storage tubs, never stopping to reflect on what they were destroying.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 345-349</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;I would have to suppose that the seasons of civilization will continue with the great cycles of contraction and expansion, and at some point in the future, who knows how many years distant, some of these cities in a land once called America may be robust and cosmopolitan in ways that we can’t imagine now, anymore than a Roman of A.D. 38 might have been able to imagine the future London of the Beatles.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 396-399</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;That process is sometimes referred to as an “outside context problem,” something so far beyond the ordinary experience of those dwelling in a certain time and place that they cannot make sense of available information. The collective mental static preventing comprehension is also sometimes referred to as “cognitive dissonance,” a term borrowed from developmental psychology. It helps explain why the American public has been sleepwalking into the future.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 412-415</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Now, exactly a hundred years after the first powered flight at Kitty Hawk, North Carolina, I can get on a jet airplane twice the size of a house several times a month and fly halfway across North America in the time it takes to finish a newspaper—and I end up feeling cranky and resentful about the service, to boot! They ran out of pretzels! The air conditioning was set too low!&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 446-449</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Because the oil peak phenomenon essentially cancels out further industrial growth of the kind we are used to, its implications lie radically outside their economic paradigm. So the oil peak phenomenon has been discounted to about zero among conventional economists, who assume that “market signals” about oil supplies will inevitably trigger innovation, which, in turn, will cause new technology to materialize and enable further growth. If the market signals are not triggering innovation, then the problem must be overstated and growth under the oil regime will resume—after, say, a normal periodic downcycle. This is obvious casuistry, but casuistry can be a great comfort when a problem has no real solution.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 521-527</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Our investment in an oil-addicted way of life—specifically the American Dream of suburbia and all its trappings—is now so inordinately large that it is too late to salvage all the national wealth wasted on building it, or to continue that way of life more than a decade or so into the future. What’s more, as we have outsourced manufacturing to other countries, the entire U.S. economy has become more and more dependent on continued misinvestment in American Dream suburbia and its accessories. No politician wants to tell voters that the American Dream has been canceled for a lack of energy resources. The U.S. economy would disintegrate. So, whichever party is in power has tended to ignore the issue or change the subject, or spin it into the realm of delusion&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 532-537</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Oil is an amazing substance. It stores a tremendous amount of energy per weight and volume. It is easy to transport. It stores easily at regular air temperature in unpressurized metal tanks, and it can sit there indefinitely without degrading. You can pump it through a pipe, you can send it all over the world in ships, you can haul it around in trains, cars, and trucks, you can even fly it in tanker planes and refuel other airplanes in flight. It is flammable but has proven to be safe to handle with a modest amount of care by people with double-digit IQs.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 580-584</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;But the base price of a barrel of oil did eventually more than quadruple by the time the embargo was called off in March 1974. And the price rise alone staggered the West and Japan. Already at that time, public transit was a thing of the past and about 85 percent of Americans drove to work every day.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 842-844</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The hostage crisis, which lasted more than a year, finished President Carter politically. Militant Islam’s singling out the United States as the Great Satan among all the other industrialized nations launched a bitter culture clash that continues to this day. Before the hostage crisis was over, Saddam Hussein of Iraq invaded neighboring Iran, an acting-out of age-old Arab-Persian religious schisms, border disputes, and political beefs.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 958-962</div></div><p>Thats an overly generous removal of US agency from the whole affair.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;(In consequence, the Soviet oil endowment passed peak in 1986 and three years later the Soviet experiment collapsed.)&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 970-971</div></div><p>Kind of suggesting a bit heavily that the Soviet Union died because of that.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;President Ronald Reagan was a cornucopian who believed that the oil supply was virtually limitless.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 983-984</div></div><p>If he thought about it at all.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;By the 1990s, American households were making a record eleven separate car trips a day running errands and chauffeuring children around.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 1013-1014</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;In Venezuela, which accounted for 12 percent of America’s oil imports, socialist President Hugo Chavez had wreaked havoc on the national oil industry by firing managers who opposed him politically. Production fell substantially and there was speculation that Venezuela, which had peaked in the 1970s, had such a battered, ancient, poorly maintained drilling infrastructure that production would never recover from the Chavez purge of expertise.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 1045-1048</div></div><p>While possibly technically accurate, this a needlessly ungenerous depiction.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Communism merely said, “We will bury you,” and Comrade Khrushchev meant that in terms of economic and social progress.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 1081-1082</div></div><p>Nice.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The avatars of inflamed Islam want to utterly destroy the infidel West, and its Great Satan seducer, the United States, and they mean down to the last beating heart.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 1082-1083</div></div><p>Not so good. He should have followed with: and the US wants them to fuck off forever and let it keep exploiting their lands.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Another Islamic nation, Iran, ruled by mullahs who inveigh ceaselessly against America and its allies, is transparently building a nuclear industry that can be used for either electric power generation or bomb-making—take your pick.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 1101-1102</div></div><p>Not true.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;We have tried to be nice and we have tried to be harsh. Nothing works, and nothing is going to work.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 1102-1103</div></div><p>Also not true. Because being fair isn&rsquo;t on the table.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;We are therefore at war with that community—not because of our choosing but because it has declared war on us.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 1123-1123</div></div><p>Are you fucking kidding me.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;This leads to other forms of impotence, such as our chronic failure to respond to tactical insults such as the first World Trade Center bombing, the attack on the U.S.S. Cole, the Khobar Towers incident, or the bombing of embassies in Tanzania and Kenya, the attack on an international residential compound in Riyadh,&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 1130-1132</div></div><p>How is establishing forward operating bases in those countries not a response?</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;our hesitation to engage wholeheartedly or to complete any military affray we find ourselves in, whether it is against Iraq in 1991 or Somalia, or giving the Taliban a month to escape from Afghanistan after 9/11, or the 2004 Shi’ite insurgency in Iraq.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 1132-1134</div></div><p>This has not aged well.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The public has heard “experts” and “Cassandras” cry wolf about oil before—and no wolf appeared, life continued normally, so why take them seriously this time? Many people consider the peak oil story another fantasy brought to us by the same alarmists who said that the Y2K computer bug would bring on the end of the world as we know it.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 1155-1157</div></div><p>The problem of prediction, like my recent article about facemasks.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;But it may be in the nature of crises that the conditions leading to them are ignored until it is too late to do anything about them. It may be hard to form a clear picture of a complex situation through a fog of facts and statistics.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 1163-1165</div></div><p>Ditto.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The denial about global peak in the United States is already fierce, as investments in car-dependent, oil-addicted infrastructure are greater here than in any other nation and Americans consider their way of life a God-given entitlement. “The American way of life is not negotiable,” vice-president Dick Cheney once famously remarked.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 1204-1206</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;That decision, perhaps foolish in hindsight, was based on Nasser’s flirtation with socialism and his cozying up to the Soviet Union, which had supplied Egypt with massive amounts of advanced weaponry, including scores of MIG fighter-bombers, in an attempt to promote conflict with Israel.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 1282-1284</div></div><p>Fine, except for the last bit. The Soviet Union had beef with Israel?</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;American policy for the past quarter-century has been based on the delusion that Saudi Arabia is stable and that America can enjoy regular supplies of its oil at a fair price indefinitely.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 1400-1401</div></div><p>It endures 16 years later. Wo could have predicted MBS?</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Because the Arabian birth rate is among the highest in the world, the annual oil welfare allotment of ordinary Saudi subjects—that is, non-royal family members—fell from a high of $28,600 in 1981 to less than $7,000 in 2003. Seventy percent of all jobs in the kingdom and 90 percent of private sector jobs are filled by foreigners.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 1411-1414</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;In short, with China becoming a presence by necessity in the region, we would be back in a cold war again, or something worse, contesting with a rival world hegemon, this time over energy resources, not ideology.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 1489-1490</div></div><p>Interesting. The last time was also resources in a way. We need vassal nations. Markets. Cheap labor. Countries that become communist are no longer resources for the hegemon.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Since the UN team was prevented from completing the search, the United States had to do it in person. The fact that nothing was found by American forces after the 2003 invasion does not prove that we didn’t have to look.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 1530-1531</div></div><p>Because vassal nations must be brought to heel and occupation is the punishment/answer. The logic is so internalized.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;That Saddam was not involved in the 9/11 attacks was no guarantee that he would refrain from sponsoring terrorist acts in the future. In fact, the 9/11 attacks might have inspired him to try an extravaganza of his own. In the midst of an international Islamic uprising, the last thing the United States needed in the Middle East was a maverick maniac in a geographically pivotal position. And so the eviction of Saddam became inevitable.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 1536-1539</div></div><p>Literally Cheney&rsquo;s one-percent doctrine.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;One is that attempting to democratize Iraq is a folly. This may be so. But by “democratize,” we mainly mean holding elections so the Iraqi people can choose their own government. It doesn’t mean forcing them to adopt a menu of permanent democratic institutions against their will.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 1558-1560</div></div><p>This did not age well and he should have known better.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Ultimately, the United States might be driven out by a combination of Iraqi resistance and political pressure back home. We certainly can’t expect to occupy Iraq forever, or even for a modest fraction of forever.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 1564-1566</div></div><p>Or can we? Sixteen years later and we&rsquo;re still there, building bases.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;In short, Iran is surrounded by American military force, within minutes of striking by air. This must make the Iranians extremely uncomfortable. We ought to hope that it doesn’t make them crazy. Americans also need to consider how long we can keep all these troops in place and in a state of readiness. The expense alone must be forbidding.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 1601-1603</div></div><p>Again, not even one sentence wondering what gives us the right to push Iran around.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;For all that, the election that took place in October 2004 was a remarkable first in that nation&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 1615-1616</div></div><p>Not true. They had a socialist government once.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;It may have been a grave mistake that the United States waited nearly a month after the attacks on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon to launch its counterattack, because it gave the leaders of the Taliban and al-Qaeda plenty of time to escape next door into the friendly precincts of sovereign Pakistani territory.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 1611-1613</div></div><p>Yeah that was the problem. Still there sixteen years later.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;However honorable he may be, though, the joke is that he is president of Kabul. He is certainly brave, inasmuch as he has already survived more than a couple of assassination attempts. In any case, American soldiers are there to protect him for the time being.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 1617-1619</div></div><p>Also has not aged well.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;its military and intelligence services riddled with Islamic fundamentalists,&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 1624-1624</div></div><p>Does anyone ever describe the Pentagon as riddled with Christian fundamentalists?</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Eventually, all the nations will have to contend with the problems of the Long Emergency: the end of industrial growth, falling standards of living, economic desperation, declining food production, and domestic political strife. A point will be reached when the great powers of the world no longer have the means to project their power any distance. Even nuclear weapons may become inoperable, considering how much their careful maintenance depends on other technological systems linked to our fossil fuel economy.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 1732-1736</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;I believe the Pacific coast of North America will be especially vulnerable to raids emanating from the disintegrating nations of Asia.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 1751-1751</div></div><p>Did the ocean get smaller?</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;To some degree, all of the non-fossil fuel energy sources actually depend on an underlying fossil fuel economy. You can’t manufacture metal wind turbines using wind energy technology. You can’t make lead-acid storage batteries for solar electric systems using any known solar energy systems.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 1763-1765</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;This age-old tendency of humans to believe in magical deliverance and to wish for happy outcomes has been aggravated by the very technological triumphs that the oil age brought into existence. Technology itself has become a kind of supernatural force, one that has demonstrably delivered all kinds of miracles within the memory of many people now living—everything from airplane travel to moving pictures to heart transplants.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 1773-1776</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;It is not as versatile as gasoline, but it does a lot of tasks beautifully. Gas is the feedstock—the raw material—for a wide array of chemicals, pharmaceuticals, and plastics. Ninety-five percent of the nitrogenous fertilizers used in America are made out of natural gas, and so it has become indispensable to U.S. agriculture.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 1801-1804</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Both the mining and the washing require huge amounts of energy, and it has been proposed that any commercial exploitation of the Alberta tar sands would take 20 percent of Canada’s total natural gas production. In the long run, it might not be worth expending the energy from gas to get the energy from the tar sands. If oil from the tar sands themselves were used to process more tar sands, the return would be three barrels of oil for every two consumed.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 1872-1875</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;In the early days of conventional oil in Texas, the ERoEI formula was very favorable, around twenty to one. The oil was found close to the surface on dry land in temperate places easy to work in, and it gushed out of the ground under its own pressure.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 1878-1880</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Going a bit further, the fundamental equations that support all gigantic global economic organisms, from oil companies to Wal-Mart to nation-states, may no longer obtain, and human life would have to reorganize its activities on a different basis. Also, once these complex systems and their subsystems halt their operations, restarting them may range from difficult to impossible—the Humpty Dumpty syndrome.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 1889-1891</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Natural hydrocarbons represent millennia of stored solar power collected by plants and distilled by geologic accident. The flare given off by igniting an ounce of charcoal starter lasts a few seconds, but the energy was derived from, say, a prehistoric tree fern absorbing sunshine for nine years.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 1957-1959</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Oil and gas are nonrenewable and limited in supply. We can’t fabricate them artificially from free elemental hydrogen and carbon without energy inputs that would exceed the fuel value of the hydrocarbons made.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 1959-1961</div></div><p>But you could use wind and solar, which is free or at least ephemeral.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;For instance, unless the hydrogen and fuel-cell system of personal transport was as democratically affordable to the broad public as the oil-based system was, how can we expect it to be politically acceptable? It has certainly been demonstrated that a fuel-cell car can be built—at least an expensive prototype. But what if it can be mass-produced only at a price that puts it in the luxury category for ordinary people? What if such cars can’t be marketed for less than $80,000 (in 2005 dollars)?&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 2010-2013</div></div><p>Very prescient. He&rsquo;s describing Tesla.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;However, the psychology of previous investment, aggravated by our national mythology about individualism and country living, has so far prevented mainstream America from even considering this alternative. We’ve poured so much money into suburbia and its accessories that we cannot now allow ourselves to imagine giving it up.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 2019-2021</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Hydroelectricity also raises a fundamental question that I will address below in detail: Can we even build the plants and equipment without an underlying base of cheap fossil fuel?&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 2105-2106</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;If the DOE estimate of potential sites is correct, the United States could boost hydroelectric capacity by roughly 50 percent of its current level. Since hydro makes up only 10 percent of total U.S. electric generation, we would gain the equivalent of about 5 percent of total current usage if all the potential hydro sites were put to use. The total includes sites that might be considered environmentally sensitive and so a percentage of them might never be exploited. Hydroelectricity is good but utilizing it to the maximum will only fractionally compensate us for losses in natural gas generation that are sure to come. Hydroelectricity also raises a fundamental question that I will address below in detail: Can we even build the plants and equipment without an underlying base of cheap fossil fuel?&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 2101-2106</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The single-family house in a suburban subdivision owes everything to cheap energy and to the broad middle classes that cheap energy has made possible.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 2153-2154</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;This is one of the main reasons that electric cars have been such a flop during the past decade: The batteries could not be improved to make them significantly less bulky or lighter, or to increase the travel range between charges. What’s more, electric cars would have carried a base price 30 percent higher than comparable gasoline models, while the batteries would have to be replaced every few years for many thousands of dollars more.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 2201-2204</div></div><p>Though we&rsquo;ve come to accept these drawbacks more, they still fundamentally apply.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The advanced nations could consciously commit themselves to dedicating some portion of the world’s remaining oil endowment to the production of wind turbines, solar arrays, and batteries—but don’t count on it happening.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 2243-2245</div></div><p>This did happen, at least to some degree.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Roman architecture would have been impossible without the complex socioeconomic platform of empire. The medieval social platform for northern European life was less elaborate and arguably less complex. Compare these two historical cases with the complexity of social and economic organization that allows oil to be extracted from the ground, refined to gasoline, transported six thousand miles, and used in a highly engineered, fine-tuned machine called a car, driven on a six-lane freeway. If the social and economic platform fails, how long before the knowledge base dissolves? Two hundred years from now, will anyone know how to build or even repair a 1962 Chrysler slant-six engine? Not to mention a Nordex 1500 kW wind turbine?&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 2274-2279</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The existing knowledge in basic physics and chemistry is so widespread that it is likely to persist quite a while into the future and provide a foundation for doing more with less than, say, the people of the eighteenth century were able to do with their more limited knowledge&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 2281-2283</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Renewables will not be able to take the place of oil and gas in running those systems. The systems themselves will have to go. Even many “environmentalists” and “greens” of our day seem to think that all we have to do is switch inputs. Instead of running all the air conditioners of Houston on oil- or gas-generated electricity, we’ll use wind farms, or massive solar arrays; we’ll have super-fuel-efficient cars and keep on commuting over the interstate highway system. It isn’t going to happen.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 2292-2296</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Carter’s successor, Ronald Reagan, canceled the synfuels initiatives altogether because he believed that there wasn’t an energy problem that couldn’t be solved by deregulation and government leaving free enterprise alone. Reagan was lucky.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 2326-2328</div></div><p>This whole section is great: explaining politics through the lens of fossil fuel markets.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Perhaps the least obvious aspect of the nuclear conundrum is this: Atomic fission is useful for producing electricity, but most of America’s energy needs are for things that electricity can’t do very well, if at all. For instance, you can’t fly airplanes on electric power from nuclear reactors.8The U.S. trucking transport system as currently operated won’t run on electricity alone.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 2544-2548</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;In the chaotic world of diminishing and contested energy resources, there will simply be a mad scramble to use up whatever fossil fuels people can manage to lay their hands on. The very idea that we possess any control over the process seems to me further evidence of the delusion gripping our late-industrial culture—the fatuous certainty that technology will save us from the diminishing returns of technology.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 2591-2594</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Without the Gulf Stream, Britain, France, the Low Countries, and Scandinavia would have a climate like Labrador’s, colder by twenty degrees Fahrenheit in annual mean. The Gulf Stream has been likened to an oceanic conveyor belt. The force of the warm water flowing north has been described as equal to the volume of seventy-five Amazon rivers.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 176</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;If the major shipping ports of London, Bombay, Yokohama, Norfolk, San Pedro, and so on, end up being submerged, humankind will just have to work around it. The disruptions to world trade might be epochal, gigantic, ultimately tragic. It seems obvious that the human race will simply have to adjust, even if that means adjusting to a new reality of severely lower expectations in living standards, comfort, and amenity. In the meantime, however, there is virtually no public discussion of this prospect in the United States now, no talk about making other arrangements. When the time comes, I suppose, many Americans will just have to move to higher ground.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 185</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Developing nations invariably increase their energy use. More cars are used, more electricity generated, more greenhouse emissions sent into the atmosphere. In the Long Emergency, to borrow a remark from author James Flink, “there will only be two types of nations: the over-developed and those which will never develop.”5 China may represent an amalgamation of those two conditions in one nation-state.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 187</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Especially significant is the stupendous amount of paving laid down in the United States during the past hundred years. It prevents rain from being absorbed as groundwater and sends it instead into rivers, and ultimately into the ocean.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 188</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;[…] joint study by a consortium of U.S. agencies and institutes projected that over the first half of the twenty-first century a one-third drop in reservoir levels along the Colorado River would cut hydropower generation by as much as 40 percent. The same study also predicted reduced flows in the Sacramento River and the Columbia River.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 189</div></div><p>This has all come to pass.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Most Floridians live within ten miles of the coast. On the Atlantic side, they depend on the Biscayne aquifer for their fresh water. More than 90 percent of Florida’s population depends on groundwater as the source of drinking water for public and private wells. If ocean levels rise even marginally, seawater will invade the Biscayne aquifer and Floridians will have to make other arrangements.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 189</div></div><p>This is something most people don&rsquo;t think about: where does my water come from? &ldquo;The Store&rdquo; is a lazy and stupid answer.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Climate change, competition for water, and polluted water sources will also be exacerbated by failures in the electric grid caused by oil and gas supply disruptions. Even if water is available, localities may lack the power to push it through their treatment plants and municipal pipes.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 190</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;As the struggle over the remaining oil and gas intensifies, larger numbers of economic losers will be created, and those economic losers will be underfed, ill-housed, poorly doctored, badly informed, badly behaved, and subject to plummeting life expectancies.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 194</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Despite miraculous advances in medical technology, genetic typing, and immunology, the nations of the world are not much better prepared for a severe flu epidemic than they were for the 1918 outbreak. Epidemic influenza is extremely difficult to counteract. Flu vaccines developed in any given year are notoriously ineffective against new strains that come along the following year. It takes seven months or more to create, test, manufacture, and distribute a vaccine developed in direct response to a new virus, and by that time the disease can burn through global populations. If a pandemic broke out today, hospital facilities would be overwhelmed. Nurses and doctors would be infected along with the rest of the population.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 197</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;[…] to act out roles following a script in which a terrorist released smallpox in one eastern U.S. city. The result was sobering to an extreme. The public health system virtually collapsed. Hospitals degenerated into chaos. Smallpox spread to twenty-five states and overseas. The national stockpile of vaccines proved to be deeply inadequate. The exercise was called off after four days from the sheer exhaustion of the participants, while the fictional epidemic was still spreading.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 200</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;According to those participating in Dark Winter, the results of a bio-terrorism attack on the United States would be massive civilian casualties, breakdown in essential institutions, violation of democratic processes, civil disorder, loss of confidence in government, and reduced strategic flexibility abroad.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 201</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The SARS virus was suspected of being a prototype in this category. Severe acute respiratory syndrome first appeared in Asia in February 2003, out of nowhere, related to the coronavirus typically associated with the common cold. It was much worse than the common cold: It eventually spread to many corners of the world and infected just over 8,000 people, of whom about one in seven died from the disease.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 201</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;However, these same energy problems will surely reduce crop production, which would lead to reduced food aid to desperate populations in poor nations, which would then lead to compromised immune systems and the migration of poor, hungry, and probably unhealthy people—and by “migration” I do not mean the orderly entry of people through airport lines, but rather the uncontrolled rush of desperate mobs, tribes, and whole ethnic groups from failing habitats into lands already occupied because they can better support human life. This is an obvious recipe for conflict and woe. Where the refugee camps set up, disease will surely follow.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 203</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;A contemplation of these circumstances that occurred seven hundred years ago gives us an idea of what to expect in the Long Emergency. One big difference is that now we can see it coming. However, we in America flatter ourselves to think that we are above this kind of general catastrophe—because our technologic prowess during the cheap-oil fiesta was so marvelous that all future problems are (supposedly) guaranteed to be solved by similar applications of ingenuity.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 206</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Many individual immune systems will be compromised by the hardships of the Long Emergency and disease will seize the opportunities presented, as it always has. AIDS ought to be especially worrisome, because even when people have lost everything, they still have sex. That may be all many people will have, and it will get them in a lot of trouble.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 207</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;Lagos, Nigeria, for example, grew from a city of 300,000 in 1950 to over 10 million today. But Lagos, writes Mike Davis, “is simply the biggest node in the shanty-town corridor of 70 million people that stretches from Abidjan to Ibadan: probably the biggest continuous footprint of urban poverty on earth.”10 Most of the world’s new, exploding slums have only the most rudimentary sanitary arrangements, open sewers running along the corridorlike “streets.” In the slums of Bombay, there is an estimated one toilet per five hundred inhabitants.</p>
<p>&ldquo;Currently two million children die every year from waste-contaminated water in the world’s slums. The enormity of this urban disaster is poorly comprehended in advanced nations like the United States, where the drinking water is still safe and even the poor have flush toilets connected to real sewers. But the slums of the world will probably be the breeding ground of the next pandemic, and chances are, once it is under way, the wealthy nations will not be spared.&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 208</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The most significant characteristic of modern civilization is the sacrifice of the future for the present, and all the power of science has been prostituted to this purpose. —William James&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 210</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Globalism was operated by oligarchical corporations on the gigantic scale, made possible by cheap oil. By “oligarchical” I mean that power was vested in small numbers of people running large organizations who were not accountable for their actions to many of the people who were subject to those actions. <strong>By “corporation,” I mean a group enterprise given the legal status of a “person,” with “rights,” but in fact devoid of any human qualities of ethics, humility, mercy, duty, or loyalty that would constrain those rights.</strong> (Emphasis added.)&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 211</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;As Wendell Berry put it, “a corporation, essentially, is a pile of money to which a number of persons have sold their moral allegiance. . . . It can experience no personal hope or remorse. No change of heart. It cannot humble itself. It goes about its business as if it were immortal, with the single purpose of becoming a bigger pile of money.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 211</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Wal-Mart was considered the theoretical equal of Bob the appliance store owner, and if Bob happened to lose in the retail competition because he couldn’t order 50,000 coffee-makers at a crack from a factory 12,000 miles away in Hangzhou, and receive a deep discount for being such an important customer, well, it wasn’t as though he hadn’t been given the chance.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 212</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Populations were, in effect, eating oil, notably in food exports from the United States, where agribusiness had completely taken over from agriculture. Local farmers in Africa, Asia, or South America couldn’t compete with corporate Archer Daniels Midland’s oil-and-gas-based grain crops and U.S. government subsidies. There was no point in even bringing their hardscrabble crops to market when sacks of cheap American wheat sat on the docks of Pusan or Colombo. Farmers in those places felt that they had no choice but to migrate to the city and find some other way to get by. The only comparative advantage that these people possessed was their willingness to work for next to nothing. Cheap oil and free-market globalism turned comparative advantage into a new kind of feudalism, with the corporations as the lords and the overabundant locals as the serfs. And then, when the comparative advantage of cheap labor ($5 a day) of one place, such as Mexico, was superseded by the cheaper labor (99 cents a day) of another place, such as Sri Lanka, the corporations just moved their operations.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 213</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The idea of comparative advantage works when there is a complex local economy intact in the background of each trading partner’s specialized item of production, with a variety of social roles and occupational niches to support the long-term project of community. But a locality geared to doing only one thing for export is ultimately a slave system based on the extractive economics of mining.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 213</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Globalism was primarily a way of privatizing the profits of business activity while socializing the costs. This was achieved by discreetly discounting the future for the sake of short-term benefits.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 211</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;One group had all the cheap labor and another group had all the capital, and for a while one group made all the things that the other group “consumed.” Thus, comparative advantage became, for a time, a con game strictly for the benefit of large corporations, which ended up enjoying all the advantages while the localities sucked up the costs.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 213</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The corporations benefiting from this regime often had no physical home of their own, even in their country of origin—and not a few American corporations had moved their official address to Caribbean pseudonations, where the banking and tax laws were more agreeable. The corporations had no allegiance to any particular place or the people of that place, so the destruction they wreaked was as manifest in the ravaged towns of Ohio and upstate New York as in the environmental degradation of China.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 214</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;America was hardly immune to the consequences of free-market globalism. In effect, the American heartland was overtaken by a new kind of corporate colonialism, emanating from our own culture, but no less destructive than the imposition of foreign rule.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 214</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Did Americans sell out their towns, their neighbors, the memory of their ancestors, and the future of their grandchildren because they were helplessly in thrall to the blandishments of a cheap-oil economy? I honestly don’t know, though I tend to view the outcome as the result of many collective bad choices made by the public and its leaders. But were those choices inescapable? Certainly the process was insidious and played out over several generations.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 215</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;There have to be limits. If we project “housing starts” ninety-nine years forward at current rates, there wouldn’t be a single build-able quarter-acre lot left in the world. Not a few economists would rationalize this outcome by declaring that ninety-nine years from now we will have colonies on the moon or Mars or under the Sea of Cortez. Or that technology coupled with human ingenuity will solve the problem some other way, perhaps by genetically reengineering human beings to be one inch tall, or booting all our consciousnesses into computer servers where unlimited numbers of virtual people could dwell in unlimited virtual environments of endless cyberspace.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 218</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;It is assumed now that human beings, prompted by the market, will employ ingenuity to discover a substitute for oil and gas, once the price starts to ramp up beyond the “affordable” range. This assumption is apt to prove fallacious because it ignores the fact that the earth is a closed system, while the laws of thermodynamics state that energy can’t be created out of nothing, only changed from low entropy to high entropy, and that we have already changed the half of our oil endowment that was easiest to get into dispersed carbon dioxide, which is now ratcheting up global warming and climate change, which might well put the industrial adventure out of business before human ingenuity can come up with a substitute for oil.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 219</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The farm depression, which preceded the financial depression by half a decade, was a self-reinforcing feedback loop. As the market prices of corn and wheat plunged, farmers desperately tried to make up for low prices by producing more, which the domestic markets could not absorb, leading to even greater surpluses and more depressed prices.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 231</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;By the mid-1920s, the great wave of immigration suddenly ended. The National Origins Act of 1924 and other measures set new highly restrictive immigration quotas that cut new admissions to 2 percent of each nationality from the 1890 census. This choked off what had been a constant half-century-long demographic subsidy of ever more customers for U.S. manufacturers.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 232</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Finance came to be viewed as a productive activity itself rather than a means to promote production. The public was no longer buying stock to invest in enterprises that would pay dividends over time, but merely because one could get rich from buying and selling stocks. As more people bought in, stock prices climbed still higher—a dangerous positive feedback loop.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 232</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Is it fair to say that the by-product of zealous oil use literally converts into such an abstract form of “pollution” capable of poisoning what amounts to a social consensus? This must return us to the idea of entropy. Entropy is the spending down of energy and its translation into negative by-products. Not all of them are physical or material. Air pollution is one expression of entropy. But so is social disorder. So is institutional breakdown. Bodily death is another.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 236</div></div><p>I like his theory of entropy introducers being somewhat fungible. That we cant ignore the detrimental effects of increased social distraction through apps, phones, or pornography. Or the damage caused by loss of trust in the money system. Or as he says, bad parenting.</p>
<p>i&rsquo;m not sure i agree 100%, but i like the idea and am glad to have read it.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The entropy produced in World War II was much more widespread and profound than that of World War I. In World War I the action had taken place almost entirely on rural terrain, classic battlefields. In World War II, much of the warfare was urban. The long-range bomber had reached a high stage of refinement in the twenty-plus years between world wars. None of the major capitals had been damaged in World War I. In World War II, hundreds of towns and cities were destroyed in Europe and Asia. Berlin was reduced to gravel; London was badly mutilated; and, of course, Hiroshima and Nagasaki became radioactive ashtrays. The casualties of World War I had been enormous, astonishing, appalling beyond civilized peoples’ wildest dreams, but the victims had been overwhelmingly soldiers. The casualties in World War II were overwhelmingly civilians and in much greater aggregate numbers.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 240</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;[…] share prices remained relatively very flat during this period. The whole notion of investment was different than it would become later in the twentieth century. In the 1950s and 1960s, stock and bond values were linked much more directly with the successful production of real goods. General Motors derived its profits and paid its dividends on the basis of auto sales, not as today, primarily from leveraging interest rates and other abstract numbers games removed from the actual making of products. In sum, the public attitude about the role of finance was extremely conservative. Finance was not an “industry” per se, but a set of institutions designed to keep the idea of money and its accessories credible, so as to allow real industries to function.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 243</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Before the great orgy of mergers and consolidation that began in the 1970s, retail banking was largely local and community-centered. Bankers made loan decisions based on firsthand knowledge of projects going on in their communities—not, as today, based on bundling and selling clumps of mortgages for generic suburban developments they have never laid eyes on.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 244</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;For the hippies the natural order of things included items such as stereo record players, electric guitars, motor vehicles for adventuring around the country, cheap bulk whole grains, and other products of an oil-intensive industrial way of life. The hippie platform, so to speak, with all its mystical incunabula, rested on the platform of “normal” American life, and would have been impossible without it.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 245</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;At the start of the oil glut, a climactic set of economic relations took shape led by Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher (and joined eagerly by President Reagan and his advisors) that would be called “globalism.” It was not so much a new idea as the logical and inevitable result of mature self-organizing systems elaborating themselves under the influence of renewed, immense energy inputs—the ultimate cheap-oil way of doing business in the closed system that is the planet Earth. It entailed the maximization of short-term profit and the minimization of care for future generations. It was the ultimate generator of entropy.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 248</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;also meant the ramping up of a “service economy” or, more properly, the myth of a service economy to replace the old manufacturing economy. I say “myth” because it was essentially absurd. It was like the old joke about the village that prospered because the inhabitants were all employed taking in each other’s laundry. In fact, far fewer actual things of value were being created in the service economy&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 248</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;It was assumed, for instance, that computers greatly boosted productivity. Much of that gain was either illusory or fraught with collateral social and economic losses of other kinds. Companies that reported higher productivity were shedding employees like mad and the entire ethos of work in America was being transformed from one of people having secure careers and permanent positions with reliable companies to one of institutionalized insecurity for practically everyone below top management in a new general atmosphere of Darwinian corporate ruthlessness—under the rubric of “free-market competition.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 249</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The computerization of corporate America promoted the hemorrhaging of jobs and whole industries to offshore locations and the “outsourcing” of whole departments to other countries. Additional diminishing returns associated with the victory of national chain retail were the wholesale destruction of American communities, including both the “hardware” of towns and the “software” of social roles and networks associated with them. Computers only assisted predatory corporations in more successfully parasitizing existing value in victimized localities.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 250</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Nothing else really mattered except building suburban houses, trading away the mortgages, selling the multiple cars needed by the inhabitants, upgrading the roads into commercial strip highways with all the necessary shopping infrastructure, and moving vast supplies of merchandise made in China for next to nothing to fill up those houses.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 251</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Americans didn’t question the validity of the suburban sprawl economy. They accepted it at face value as the obvious logical outcome of their hopes and dreams and defended it viciously against criticism. They steadfastly ignored its salient characteristic: that it had no future either as an economy or as a living arrangement. Each further elaboration of the suburban system made it less likely to survive any change in conditions, most particularly any change in the equations of cheap oil.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 251</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;“industry” in its own right helping to “drive” the economy. Among the distortions and perversions engendered by the “stagflation” economy was the rise of corporate cannibalism in the form of “creative” mergers and acquisitions, specifically hostile takeovers, the aggressive use of voting stock shares to gain control of companies that did not wish to sell, with the subsequent filleting and sell-off of assets, and discarding of the bones and offal (employee payrolls and obligations, careers, livelihoods, communities).&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 252</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Among the distortions and perversions engendered by the “stagflation” economy was the rise of corporate cannibalism in the form of “creative” mergers and acquisitions, specifically hostile takeovers, the aggressive use of voting stock shares to gain control of companies that did not wish to sell, with the subsequent filleting and sell-off of assets, and discarding of the bones and offal (employee payrolls and obligations, careers, livelihoods, communities).&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 252</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;In the face of the things like the dotcom meltdown, the LTCM scare, the Enron scandal, and other disasters that eroded the notional value of financial paper, home ownership itself was now turned into a magical generator of unearned riches for both borrowers and lenders. It was consistent with the Las Vegas-ization of the national moral sense, chiefly the increasingly popular belief at every level of American life that it really was possible to get something for nothing. Anyone could see this in the easy public acceptance of gambling as okay and the proliferation of casinos everywhere in the land. Not even the evangelical Christians seemed to mind.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 258</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;[…] if there is less gasoline to power up the fleet of cars necessary to service it, and no natural gas to heat the thousand-square-foot cathedral-ceilinged lawyer foyer, then chances are that the house is going to be a liability rather than an asset.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 259</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;From 1999 to 2004 roughly a third of all house owners indulged in cash-out re-fi mortgages.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 261</div></div><p>Citation? A bit thin on those, but I&rsquo;m more inclined to trust that he&rsquo;s done his homework.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Behind every extravagant cash extraction lay the belief that at some future date the house would be worth a lot more than the re-fi price and could be readily flipped.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 261</div></div><p>This happened. House-flipper became a career option.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;After the mid-1990s, there was hardly a technical distinction to be made anymore between high-risk borrowers and everybody else in the casino atmosphere of America society. No one was at risk anymore because in the something-for-nothing economy it was impossible to be a loser. Or so went the herd thinking.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 261</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;By the time you read this, it is very likely that the housing bubble will have begun to come to grief.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 262</div></div><p>That&rsquo;s a bingo.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The failure of the GSEs would make the S&amp;L fiasco of the 1980s look like a bad night of poker. The failure of the GSEs would pose a far graver situation than the LTCM flameout. It could easily bring on cascading failures that might jeopardize global finance. This time, the American public would feel the pain.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 263</div></div><p>On the money.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;If the folks who lived along this highway put in gardens to make up for the escalating inadequacies of an industrial farming system starved for fossil fuel “inputs,” would they be able to feed themselves? Did any vernacular knowledge survive in a populace conditioned to think that food came from the supermarket? Did they know anything about cabbage loopers, powdery mildew, or anthracnose? Would they be able to prevent catastrophic crop loss? How would they defend their crops against deer, rabbits, woodchucks? Would any of them know how to build a garden wall, or even a fence? Where would they get fencing material? Would they have to sit out among the potato hills and the bean rows at night with loaded shotguns? And what would they do for light when they heard something munching out there? Would they know how to keep chicken, sheep, cattle, including breeding and birthing them?&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 268</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Because human social and economic systems are essentially self-organizing in the face of circumstance, the big questions are how much disorder must we endure as things change, and how hard will we struggle to continue a particular way of life with no future?&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 270</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The U.S. economy of the decades to come will center on farming, not high-tech, or “information,” or “services,” or space travel, or tourism, or finance. All other activities will be secondary to food production, which will require much more human labor.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 271</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;[A] hundred years ago, just before the introduction of the fossil fuel-based technologies, more than 30 percent of the American population was engaged in farming. Now the figure is 1.6 percent. The issue is not moral, academic, or aesthetic. Rather it’s a matter of those ratios being made possible only because cheap oil and automation made up for so much human labor.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 272</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The lucky suburbanites will be the ones with the forethought to trade in their suburban McHouses for property in the towns and small cities, and prepare for a vocational life doing something useful and practical on the small scale,&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 289</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Wal-Mart will not be able to profitably run its “warehouse on wheels” when the price of oil fluctuates chronically (always along an upward trend line),&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 290</div></div><p>They benefit now from Covid-19 by gobbling up cheap oil futures at negative prices.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;We will never again experience the explosion of products, choices, and nonstop marketing that characterized the late twentieth century. The public may look back on the big-box shopping era with deep and mournful nostalgia, but we are apt to discover that happiness is still possible without the extraordinary advertising-driven compulsive materialism of recent decades. We will still have commerce. We will have trade. There will be shopping. We will have some kind of medium of exchange. But we are not going to live in a perpetual blue-light special sale of cornucopian wretched excess.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 290</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Even if we can’t get all the tools and the products we currently enjoy, we will retain a lot of basic knowledge that the people of Jefferson’s day just didn’t have. For instance, we will still understand that infections and many diseases are caused by microorganisms, not bad air, phases of the moon, or evil spells, and that knowledge alone confers powerful advantages in daily living.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 291</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Large-scale corporate enterprise has brought humankind much material comfort in two centuries, but at the price of fantastic unintended consequences (externalized costs) ranging from the destruction of local communities to climate change.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 292</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;We should probably conclude that the abandoned big-box structures will not last more than one generation under any circumstances. Pretty much the same thing can be said about malls, strip malls, and chain restaurant buildings. Eventually they will be the salvage yards and mines of the future.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 294</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;One final thing worth noting on the subject of rail: From 1890 to about 1920, American localities managed to construct hundreds of local and interurban streetcar lines that added up to a magnificent national system (independent of the national heavy rail system). Except for two twenty-mile gaps in New York state, one could ride the trolley lines from New England clear out to Wisconsin. The story of the conspiracy by General Motors and other companies to destroy the U.S. interurban system is well documented. The salient point, however, is how rapidly the system was created in the first place, and how marvelously well it served the public in the period before the automobile became established&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 303</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;[…] high school in our time amounts to little more than day care for virtual adults in which some learning might incidentally take place, much of it of dubious value.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 305</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The Southwest also faces increasing friction with adjoining Mexico. This is not a racist provocation but a description of reality. No other first-world country has such an extensive land frontier with a third-world country. The income gap between the United States and Mexico is greater than that between any other two contiguous countries in the world.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 310</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;In any case, it is human nature to consider a place “home” if you were born there, or have family there, or have spent some portion of your life there, and people are naturally reluctant to leave home. I daresay that many Americans now living in the Southwest will not be disposed to understand what is really happening—that the carrying capacity of their home region has been suddenly and drastically reduced—and they will hunker down hoping for a return to better times.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 314</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;After air conditioning became widely affordable, southerners hardly went outside anymore, unless it was in a motor vehicle. Anything about southern vernacular architecture that once had been graceful in adapting to the climate was cast aside for the pleasures of air conditioning and cheapness of construction.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 318</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The gigantic smear of suburbia that runs almost without interruption from north of Boston through Connecticut, New York, New Jersey, Baltimore, Washington, and northern Virginia is not going to be a happy place.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 328</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;While it is true that many blacks have joined the middle class, at least in terms of jobs and pay, a disturbing aura of cultural separatism persists, supported by the multiculturalists in education, with terribly demoralizing effects on that substantial minority of the minority who never made it into the middle class.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 336</div></div><p>This analysis is basically useless. See <em>The New Jim Crow</em> by Michelle Alexander (a book rife with citations). See the white assets vs. black assets before and after the 2008 crash. See how blacks are the first victims of every shock. That blacks are systemically disadvantaged is not theoretical. It&rsquo;s legitimate to argue that affirmative action is not a viable solution, but you can&rsquo;t pretend that the systemic discrimination doesn&rsquo;t exist. There may be no other solution than &ldquo;stop being racist&rdquo;, which, good luck with that.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The grievance and belligerence that smolders under the surface of the hip-hop saturnalia is unattached to any coherent political claims beyond the debatable clichés of “structural racism.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 337</div></div><p>As above, this section did not age well. Structural racism is proven. It had been proven then, too.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Any place can become a Beirut under certain unfavorable circumstances.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 338</div></div><p>Laughably ignoring the irony of Israel&rsquo;s own racist involvement there. Kunstler has a blind spot for Israel&rsquo;s perfidy.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;I’m aware of having already lived more than a half century through the greatest fiesta of luxury, comfort, and leisure that the world has ever known. I enjoyed central heating, air conditioning, cheap air fares, cable TV, advanced orthopedic surgery, and computers.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 342</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;With Katrina, all the common supports of civilized existence went down and stayed down: electricity, telephones, sanitation, drinking water, public safety, and food distribution. The behavior of those left behind in the flood seemed as desperate as their circumstances, while government at all levels floundered spectacularly.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 347</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;[…] the price of housing in most of the hot markets, such as the San Francisco Bay area, had lost any historically comprehensible relationship to salaries or rents. In Miami, sixty thousand condominium units were either under construction or emerging from the permit approval process. An estimated 70 percent of the buyers there were “flippers” or speculators, and those who had bought with creative interest-only or adjustable-rate mortgages stood to be reamed if the market cooled and they could not expedite their flips.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 352</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The BBC reported that unofficial estimates of Iraqi civilian deaths varied from 10,000 to over 37,000.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 358</div></div><p>War will still kills more than Covid-19. The difference is in the victims: wars kill people who don&rsquo;t matter. Like malaria.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;China also faced horrendous environmental problems and was governed by a weird crypto-Communist bureaucracy that, despite all the trappings of free enterprise, ruled by force and violence.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 361</div></div><p>Here, he&rsquo;s utterly failing to see the irony that he&rsquo;s kind of describing America as well.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;They couldn’t buy the idea that we could get blindsided by a permanent global energy crisis. And they had been so successful—become so rich—moving little pixels around video screens that they seemed to assume that the energy rescue remedy was just a few mouse clicks away. I couldn’t persuade them that life is tragic—in the sense that happy endings really aren’t guaranteed, not even for Americans.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 362</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;As a registered Democrat, I have worries about the failures of my own party, the putative opposition to the neocons now ruling. Why has not one national Democratic politician come forward and proposed to fix the American railroad system—the one project we could certainly address with confidence?&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 363</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The environmental movement, especially at the elite levels in places like Aspen, is full of Harvard graduates who believe that all the drive-in espresso stations in America can be run on a combination of solar and wind power. I quarrel with these people incessantly. It seems especially tragic to me that some of the brightest people I meet are bent on mounting the tragic campaign to sustain the unsustainable in one way or another. But I maintain that life is essentially tragic in the sense that history won’t care if we make bad collective decisions or whether we succeed or fail at carrying on the project of civilization.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 365</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;It will be salutary for the nation to see those who engineered the banking collapse come to greater grief than the mere surrender of their Gulfstream jets and Hamptons villas.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 367</div></div><p>None of this happened. We were more hopeful then.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The tragic part of all this, of course, is that the temporary plunge in oil prices has prompted an incurious American public to assume, once again, that the global oil predicament is some kind of a fraud. Given the flood tide of fraud they have been subject to in banking and investment matters, I suppose you can’t blame them from thinking that everything is some kind of a scam.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 373</div></div><p>Just like they believe Covid-19 is now a scam.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;I’ve said enough about this in the past, but it’s worth reiterating that a failure to get comprehensive passenger rail service going will be a sign of how fundamentally unserious we are as a society.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 374</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;[…] the earlier fiasco in Georgia, where the U.S. prompted Georgian President Mikheil Saakashvili to send troops into the South Ossetia region and the move was answered by overwhelming force from neighboring Russia, leaving the United States looking feckless and retarded for its troubles.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 375</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;My guess is that neither the United States nor Israel will attempt to take out their facilities anytime soon.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 376</div></div><p>Wrong. Stuxnet. It was an act of war. Largely ignored.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
      </div>
      </div>
        <div class="footer">
    <div class="footer-data"><div class="footer-links"><ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/contact.php" title="">Contact</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/support.php" title="">Support</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/privacy.php" title="">Privacy</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/rights.php" title="">Rights</a></li></ul></div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="copyright">Copyright (c) 1999-2026 earthli.com. All Rights Reserved.</div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="versions">Powered by <ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore/app_news.php">earthli News 3.7</a></li><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore" title="">earthli WebCore&trade; 3.7</a></li></ul></div></div>    </div>
      </div>
  </div>  </body>
</html>
]]>
  </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
      <title type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[World Made by Hand by James Howard Kunstler (2008, read in 2020)]]>
  </title>
    <id>https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3937</id>
    <link href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3937"/>
    <updated>2020-04-13T21:27:35+02:00</updated>
    <author>
        <name type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[Marco von Ballmoos]]>
  </name>
      <uri>https://earthli.com/users/marco</uri>
    </author>
      <summary type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<blockquote class="quote abstract "><div>Disclaimer: these are notes I took while reading this book. They include citations I found interesting or enlightening or particularly well-written. In some cases, I&rsquo;ve pointed out which of these applies to which citation; in others, I have not. Any benefit you gain from reading these notes is... [<a class="complete-text-link" href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3937">More</a>]</div></blockquote>]]>
  </summary>
      <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<html lang="en">
  <head>
    <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/themes/ice.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/fonts/raleway.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/core/medium.css">
  </head>
  <body>
<div class="style-controls">  <div class="page">
    <div class="page-body">
<div class="info-box-top">
<p>
Published by <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_user.php?name=marco" title="Marco von Ballmoos" class="visible">marco</a> on <span class="date-time">13. Apr 2020 21:27:35 (GMT-5)</span>
</p>
<p>
Updated by <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_user.php?name=marco" title="Marco von Ballmoos" class="visible">marco</a> on <span class="date-time">13. Apr 2020 22:15:59 (GMT-5)</span>
</p>
</div>
      <div class="text-flow wide">
  <blockquote class="quote abstract "><div>Disclaimer: these are notes I took while reading this book. They include citations I found interesting or enlightening or particularly well-written. In some cases, I&rsquo;ve pointed out which of these applies to which citation; in others, I have not. Any benefit you gain from reading these notes is purely incidental to the purpose they serve of reminding me what I once read. Please see Wikipedia for a summary if I&rsquo;ve failed to provide one sufficient for your purposes. If my notes serve to trigger an interest in this book, then I&rsquo;m happy for you.</div></blockquote><p>This book is the first of several novels fictionalizing a world as envisioned in <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3938">The Long Emergency</a>, a non-fiction account of the coming end of cheap oil and its many repercussions for a world nearly exclusively predicated on it. In this novel, the nearly complete unavailability of fossil fuels was engendered not by a natural lack of easy resources, but by nuclear attacks on Washington and Los Angeles (vaguely hinted at, with no clear enemy blamed) and a kind of super-flu that wiped out a lot of people and put an end to any semblance of shared, national-level infrastructure.</p>
<p>The story is of Robert Ehrlich, who lives in Union Grove, New York (fictional, but within a couple days&rsquo; march of Albany). He&rsquo;s a form sales executive turned carpenter who lost his wife and daughter to the flu and his son Daniel to wanderlust many years ago. The town of Union Grove has a decent water supply, but very sporadic electricity—it&rsquo;s nearly nonexistent and therefore completely unreliable, more of a curiosity of a time long past. They grow some food, cook with wood, etc. Though they still live in the houses of a more modern past, they make very little use of any of the more advanced accoutrements.</p>
<p>To the north of the town is an encampment of former bikers and ne&rsquo;er-do-wells who&rsquo;ve monopolized the business of reclamation and re-selling of goods stripped from abandoned—and some, not-quite-yet-abandoned—houses and businesses. The place is called Karptown and is run by a miscreant straight out of the Mad Max movies named Wayne Karp.</p>
<p>Also near the town is a fully self-sufficient plantation run by Stephen Bullock, who is basically a lord of many serfs, but pretty benevolent. This organization is not too far-fetched and is quite likely to be one of the types of cultures that survives—as long as the ruler stays benevolent, the group stays relatively small and manageable and the community is successful without any debilitating tragedies that would throw it out of equilibrium.</p>
<p>The final group is a bunch of highly capable religious travelers akin to the Amish, but nomadic and far less averse to technology, headed by Brother Jobe. He settles on the area, having traveled up from Pennsylvania, where things are <span class="quote-inline">&ldquo;much worse&rdquo;</span>. He doesn&rsquo;t want to take things up, per se, but he does think that the local townsfolk have been somewhat shiftless and directionless [1], leaving them open to the predations of Wayne Karp, among others.</p>
<p>Within this structure, the basic plot points are as follows:</p>
<ul>
<li>One of Wayne&rsquo;s band kills a promising local young man from town while Robert doesn&rsquo;t exactly look on, but is utterly helpless to do anything after the fact.</li>
<li>Jobe thinks Karp&rsquo;s band should be punished.</li>
<li>Jobe and Robert visit Bullock—also the local magistrate—and ask if he&rsquo;ll help bring Karp and his crew to heel.</li>
<li>Bullock is more interested in finding out what happened to four of his men and a trading vessel that he sent down Albany way.</li>
<li>They agree to help, but only if he sends supplies (lengths of pipe) to help them repair the town&rsquo;s water supply. They do this and water-service is restored, restoring also a bit of self-confidence and faith in the townspeople.</li>
<li>The young man&rsquo;s wife and child move in to Robert&rsquo;s house to &ldquo;keep house&rdquo;. There is really no other choice, though several townspeople purse their lips in disapproval that stems from a way of life that no longer applies.</li>
<li>Robert and several of Jobe&rsquo;s acolytes head down to Albany to investigate.</li>
<li>They discover that Albany is all buy lawless and in the hands of an even greater miscreant than Wayne Karp. Robert learns of the brutal efficiency of Jobe&rsquo;s men—who, while they&rsquo;ve mostly found Jesus, are also almost all former military.</li>
<li>They return with the four men and having eliminated the threat to river trade by shooting nearly the entire gang who&rsquo;d coopted it for themselves.</li>
<li>Bullock celebrates their return with a giant party that empties out the town.</li>
<li>Karp&rsquo;s men come down to rob the town and also to see if they can find some &ldquo;action&rdquo; from any ladies who didn&rsquo;t attend the party (Robert&rsquo;s new roommate being one of them).</li>
<li>On the same day, Jobe and his men set up a barbershop that isn&rsquo;t quite voluntary and shave a bunch of beards from unwilling customers.</li>
<li>Robert and the pastor (Loren) arrest Jobe, who comes along relatively quietly and lets himself be put in jail.</li>
<li>Robert and Loren head up to Karptown to arrest Karp. Things go predictably—he says &ldquo;no&rdquo;—and Robert gets covered in buckets of shit, but only after Loren&rsquo;s asshole is torn open by brutal paddling. They make their way back to town, with the help of some of Jobe&rsquo;s men.</li>
<li>Jobe&rsquo;s men go up to Karptown to collect Karp and return with him, placing him in a cell next to Jobe&rsquo;s. Minor, one of the men who&rsquo;d proven so essential on the trip to Albany was unfortunately killed in the raid.</li>
<li>Jobe is praying feverishly.</li>
<li>The next morning, Jobe is no longer in his cell, but the door is still chained shut. Karp&rsquo;s cell is also still locked, but he&rsquo;d dead, with a bullet-wound through his eye that <em>exactly matches</em> the one Minor had suffered the night before.</li>
<li>Robert learns that Minor was Jobe&rsquo;s son.</li>
<li>Robert finds Jobe on the grounds he and his people had settled on: the old High School that he&rsquo;d purchased and which his people were fixing up to house their &ldquo;queen bee&rdquo;, a bizarrely and grotesquely fat woman who seems to have the gift of preternatural sight…but that seems to be a plot line that will be pursued more fully in subsequent novels.</li>
<li>They talk and Jobe is super-mysterious and also just kind of disappears, leading Robert to wonder what sort of supernatural stuff is going on. The &ldquo;eye for an eye&rdquo; stuff gives him quite a bit of pause, especially in his fraught condition, having hardly slept, drunk too much whiskey and still being desperately worried about his friend Loren, who&rsquo;d undergone surgery the night before.</li>
<li>The book ends several months later, with Robert in charge of the town and Loren having recovered more or less fully. Karp&rsquo;s gang is subdued while Jobe&rsquo;s crew is doing well on their own, as are Bullock&rsquo;s people.</li></ul><p>On a side note, I was quite surprised to learn that Kunstler doesn&rsquo;t know how to use past tenses correctly. He very, very often uses &ldquo;did&rdquo; when he definitely meant to use &ldquo;had done&rdquo;, which I&rsquo;d taken to be a more modern affectation of young authors whose education had gone missing. I&rsquo;d never noticed his online work to suffer from the same affliction, so I&rsquo;m somewhat mystified as to the reason behind it.</p>
<p>Some authors use the incorrect form in dialogue, in order to impart an authenticity to the speech patterns of their characters. The patois of upstate New York—near Albany, where the book takes place—most definitely fails to distinguish between verb forms in nearly any way, placing all of the legwork required to determine when and if something happened squarely on the listener.</p>
<p>Confusion abounds, but what can you do when no-one can be bothered? Perhaps this curtailed version of English is what we&rsquo;ve got to work with from here on out. Perhaps Kunstler&rsquo;s subtle point is that the World Made By Hand won&rsquo;t have time for such niceties. The theme of the book is a world that has been simplified by nuclear attacks and influenza epidemics from our high-tech quasi-nightmare to a much more bucolic and brutal lifestyle. Perhaps the language followed suit.</p>
<p><hr></p>
<div class="footnote-reference"><span id="footnote_DRAFTABLE_ENTRY_3937_1_body" class="footnote-number">[1]</span> <p>After reading one of their interactions, I wrote the following imagining of how Robert could have responded to Jobe:</p>
<p>&ldquo;So you want me to help you fight a fight that&rsquo;s not mine, but lies in another land, outside my jurisdiction, a jurisdiction that&rsquo;s defined by the limits of my meager power. You do understand that the world has shrunk? That our reach is no longer so long? Or do you simply choose to impose your simplistic morality from a bygone day—a morality that was arguably never really applicable then either—and do what? Take what&rsquo;s mine because I refuse to help you in your quest? So you&rsquo;ll take my refusal to help you prosecute one moral crusade as an invitation to judge me, take what I have and give yourself over to the same morality that you attacked me for failing to help you prosecute?&rdquo;</p>
</div><h2>Citations</h2><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;It was too bad because it might have lit up our whole town. Anyway, the little dam there had been breeched, and rebuilding that would have been more than our community could manage. I don’t know if anybody would even have known how to do it. It was chilling to reflect on how well the world used to work and how much we’d lost.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 4</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;A few people took to smoking opium, but those with an extremely apathetic attitude toward survival tended not to last long in the new disposition of things.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 30</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Children like my Daniel and Genna had sat in those very box buildings under buzzing fluorescent lights listening to their science teachers prattle about the wonders of space travel and gene splicing and how we were all going to live to be a hundred and twenty five years old in “smart” computer-controlled houses where all we had to do was speak to bump up the heat or turn on the giant home theater screens in a life of perpetual leisure and comfort. It made me sick to think about it. Not because there’s something necessarily wrong with leisure or comfort, but because that’s where our aspirations ended. And in the face of what had actually happened to us, it seemed obscenely stupid.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 33</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Few dogs were around anymore. Some had been eaten during the hunger that followed the flu in the spring of that year. People didn’t talk about it, it was so demoralizing. And now, with no manufactured pet food, you had to have a productive household to be able to feed one […]&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 36</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;All the trustees were men, no women and no plain laborers. As the world changed, we reverted to social divisions that we’d thought were obsolete. The egalitarian pretenses of the high-octane decades had dissolved and nobody even debated it anymore, including the women of our town. A plain majority of the townspeople were laborers now, whatever in life they had been before. Nobody called them peasants, but in effect that’s what they’d become. That’s just the way things were.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 101</div></div><p>A little blunt and eager, but probable. Would be interesting to know what he thinks the women feel about this. It&rsquo;s an easy attitude to have when you&rsquo;re on the council.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>“I mean, as a practical matter, there is no government,” I said.</p>
<p>“Oh. I see what you’re driving at. Well, again, frankly, that’s a fair appraisal of things. I guess you could say we’re keeping the chairs warm, under the theory that this . . . this whatever it is . . . this rough patch we’re going through . . . that it eventually comes to an end.” </p>
<p>“What do you think the chances of that are?”</p>
<p>Furman leaned closer to me, over the top of his typewriter. “Again, to be really candid, it doesn’t look so good. You asked about the government. The people who worked here? Well, there’s an answer to your question. Most of them stopped coming to work when they stopped getting paid.</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 169 (Robert in a discussion with the powerless Lt. Governor in Albany)</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>“Who all is this wing nut across the way?”</p>
<p>“I guess you’d say he’s another preacher man.”</p>
<p>“What’s he in for?”</p>
<p>“Cutting off beards without permission.”</p>
<p>“Who the hell you got to get permission from around here to cut off a got-damn beard?”</p>
<p>“The owner of the beard,” I said.</p>
<p>“Well, ain’t that some shit,” he said.</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 299</div></div>      </div>
      </div>
        <div class="footer">
    <div class="footer-data"><div class="footer-links"><ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/contact.php" title="">Contact</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/support.php" title="">Support</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/privacy.php" title="">Privacy</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/rights.php" title="">Rights</a></li></ul></div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="copyright">Copyright (c) 1999-2026 earthli.com. All Rights Reserved.</div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="versions">Powered by <ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore/app_news.php">earthli News 3.7</a></li><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore" title="">earthli WebCore&trade; 3.7</a></li></ul></div></div>    </div>
      </div>
  </div>  </body>
</html>
]]>
  </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
      <title type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[Stacked Borrows: An Aliasing Model for Rust by Ralf Jung, Hoang-hai Dang, Jeehoon Kang, Derek Dreyer (2020, read in 2020)]]>
  </title>
    <id>https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3947</id>
    <link href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3947"/>
    <updated>2020-04-13T20:11:27+02:00</updated>
    <author>
        <name type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[Marco von Ballmoos]]>
  </name>
      <uri>https://earthli.com/users/marco</uri>
    </author>
      <summary type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<blockquote class="quote abstract "><div>Disclaimer: these are notes I took while reading this book. They include citations I found interesting or enlightening or particularly well-written. In some cases, I&rsquo;ve pointed out which of these applies to which citation; in others, I have not. Any benefit you gain from reading these notes is... [<a class="complete-text-link" href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3947">More</a>]</div></blockquote>]]>
  </summary>
      <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<html lang="en">
  <head>
    <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/themes/ice.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/fonts/raleway.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/core/medium.css">
  </head>
  <body>
<div class="style-controls">  <div class="page">
    <div class="page-body">
<div class="info-box-top">
<p>
Published by <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_user.php?name=marco" title="Marco von Ballmoos" class="visible">marco</a> on <span class="date-time">13. Apr 2020 20:11:27 (GMT-5)</span>
</p>
<p>
Updated by <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_user.php?name=marco" title="Marco von Ballmoos" class="visible">marco</a> on <span class="date-time">30. Apr 2024 15:59:15 (GMT-5)</span>
</p>
</div>
      <div class="text-flow wide">
  <blockquote class="quote abstract "><div>Disclaimer: these are notes I took while reading this book. They include citations I found interesting or enlightening or particularly well-written. In some cases, I&rsquo;ve pointed out which of these applies to which citation; in others, I have not. Any benefit you gain from reading these notes is purely incidental to the purpose they serve of reminding me what I once read. Please see Wikipedia for a summary if I&rsquo;ve failed to provide one sufficient for your purposes. If my notes serve to trigger an interest in this book, then I&rsquo;m happy for you.</div></blockquote><p>This <a href="https://plv.mpi-sws.org/rustbelt/stacked-borrows/paper.pdf">paper (PDF)</a> (<cite><a href="http://plv.mpi-sws.org/">Saarland Informatics Campus, Germany</a></cite>) is a recent one addressing one of the main weaknesses of the &ldquo;borrow checker&rdquo; in Rust. What&rsquo;s a borrow checker? Where other programming languages have chosen from manual memory-management (C, early C++, early Pascal, etc.), garbage-collection (C#, Java, etc.) and reference-counting (Swift, modern C++, etc.), Rust chose a new path: the borrow checker.</p>
<p>The rules of the language require that the program be written in a manner where it is always clear who owns memory and who is &ldquo;using&rdquo; memory. Allocated memory is always deallocated when it leaves the scope in which it was allocated, unless the memory was passed on to a different scope by &ldquo;loaning&rdquo; it. If a &ldquo;borrowed&rdquo; reference lingers after this scope is closed, the compiler flags it as an error. Rust also has a lot of support for explicitly copying references, when the borrow checker can&rsquo;t be satisfied any other way. The algorithm treats mutable and immutable references accordingly. See the <a href="https://doc.rust-lang.org/1.8.0/book/references-and-borrowing.html">Rust documentation on references and borrowing</a> or the paper itself for an in-depth discussion.</p>
<p>This approach requires more involvement on the part of the programmer, but also results in programs that provably have neither memory leaks nor access violations should the program pass compilation. This is a very interesting property for Rust to be able to guarantee—and it accomplishes it without a garbage collector (with its associated performance issues and difficulty in being predictable enough for real-time, system-level code) or reference-counting (which also incurs performance overhead and require participation of the runtime). Instead, a Rust program&rsquo;s memory usage is guaranteed by the compiler to be correct, so there is no need for asynchronous tasks or runtime support.</p>
<p>In the current incarnation of Rust, this guarantee comes with a big caveat: the borrow checker does not deal with <code>unsafe</code> blocks at all. It is hoped that most Rust code can avoid <code>unsafe</code> blocks, relying instead of higher-level abstractions that hide unsafe code. However, what guarantee is there that the unsafe code used in the common libraries or popular crates is not misallocating or misusing memory? While the code in the base libraries is fastidiously written and covered by myriad tests, errors are bound to slip in.</p>
<p>This is where the software proposed in this paper comes in. The authors build on the borrow-checker concept to extend it to unsafe regions as well. They come up with a new borrow-checking algorithm called &ldquo;Stacked Borrows&rdquo; that is more sophisticated than the initial algorithm introduced with and still used in modern Rust. The authors show that the their algorithm not only allows a compiler to improve its borrow-checking <em>but also</em> increases the number of situations in which a compiler can be 100% sure of the placement of variable manipulations so that it can optimize many more situations to produce much more performant code. [1]</p>
<p>That is,</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;In this work, we propose Stacked Borrows, an operational semantics for memory accesses in Rust. Stacked Borrows defines an aliasing discipline and declares programs violating it to have undefined behavior, meaning the compiler does not have to consider such programs when performing optimizations.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>They obviously spent quite a bit of time honing their algorithm, running their test interpreter and compiler against a large part of the Rust standard library and popular crates. Their paper includes not only the algorithm, but also several proofs for why the algorithm can guarantee certain properties that a compiler can use to optimize code much better than today&rsquo;s Rust compiler. Not only that, but their attack on the corpus of Rust code yielded several cases in which highly central Rust runtime/system <code>unsafe</code> code was incorrect and possibly leaked or violated memory. Several of their pull requests have been accepted and the team and their tool is quite well-received in the Rust community.</p>
<p>They have made this tool, an interpreter named <em>Miri</em> available for anyone to use and test until <span class="quote-inline">&ldquo;[we can] eventually mak[e] a variant of Stacked Borrows part of the official semantics of Rust.&rdquo;</span></p>
<p><hr></p>
<div class="footnote-reference"><span id="footnote_DRAFTABLE_ENTRY_3947_1_body" class="footnote-number">[1]</span> A lot of code optimization done by compilers involves being able to move variable loads and stores in a way that avoids touching registers more often than necessary, improving cache locality, etc. <em>without</em> changing the semantics of the program. Understandably, a compiler is required to be pessimistic about changing anything from what the developer actually specified. Where &ldquo;lowering&rdquo; is a free transformation from one formulation to another that is <em>exactly equivalent</em>, the optimizations we are talking about are still provable, but are no longer so &ldquo;obviously&rdquo; transformations between equivalent states. For example, a compiler could avoid certain volatility constraints if it can guarantee that a certain change is always preceded by a memory fence, or the compiler can leave off array-bounds-checking if it knows that the indexing will never leave the bounds of the array, etc.</div><h2>Citations</h2><p>None.</p>
      </div>
      </div>
        <div class="footer">
    <div class="footer-data"><div class="footer-links"><ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/contact.php" title="">Contact</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/support.php" title="">Support</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/privacy.php" title="">Privacy</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/rights.php" title="">Rights</a></li></ul></div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="copyright">Copyright (c) 1999-2026 earthli.com. All Rights Reserved.</div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="versions">Powered by <ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore/app_news.php">earthli News 3.7</a></li><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore" title="">earthli WebCore&trade; 3.7</a></li></ul></div></div>    </div>
      </div>
  </div>  </body>
</html>
]]>
  </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
      <title type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[Storage Combinators by Marcel Weiher and Robert Hirschfeld (2019, read in 2020)]]>
  </title>
    <id>https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3946</id>
    <link href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3946"/>
    <updated>2020-04-13T18:20:27+02:00</updated>
    <author>
        <name type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[Marco von Ballmoos]]>
  </name>
      <uri>https://earthli.com/users/marco</uri>
    </author>
      <summary type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<blockquote class="quote abstract "><div>Disclaimer: these are notes I took while reading this book. They include citations I found interesting or enlightening or particularly well-written. In some cases, I&rsquo;ve pointed out which of these applies to which citation; in others, I have not. Any benefit you gain from reading these notes is... [<a class="complete-text-link" href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3946">More</a>]</div></blockquote>]]>
  </summary>
      <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<html lang="en">
  <head>
    <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/themes/ice.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/fonts/raleway.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/core/medium.css">
  </head>
  <body>
<div class="style-controls">  <div class="page">
    <div class="page-body">
<div class="info-box-top">
<p>
Published by <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_user.php?name=marco" title="Marco von Ballmoos" class="visible">marco</a> on <span class="date-time">13. Apr 2020 18:20:27 (GMT-5)</span>
</p>
<p>
Updated by <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_user.php?name=marco" title="Marco von Ballmoos" class="visible">marco</a> on <span class="date-time">13. Apr 2020 22:00:18 (GMT-5)</span>
</p>
</div>
      <div class="text-flow wide">
  <blockquote class="quote abstract "><div>Disclaimer: these are notes I took while reading this book. They include citations I found interesting or enlightening or particularly well-written. In some cases, I&rsquo;ve pointed out which of these applies to which citation; in others, I have not. Any benefit you gain from reading these notes is purely incidental to the purpose they serve of reminding me what I once read. Please see Wikipedia for a summary if I&rsquo;ve failed to provide one sufficient for your purposes. If my notes serve to trigger an interest in this book, then I&rsquo;m happy for you.</div></blockquote><p>This <a href="https://www.hpi.uni-potsdam.de/hirschfeld/publications/media/WeiherHirschfeld_2019_StorageCombinators_AcmDL_Preprint.pdf">paper (PDF)</a> (<cite><a href="http://www.hpi.uni-potsdam.de/">Hasso Plattner Institute, University of Potsdam, Potsdam, Germany</a></cite>) discusses a proposal for composing all objects in a software system using a common API called &ldquo;Storage Combinators&rdquo; rather than using custom interfaces everywhere. They authors demonstrate how an application could benefit from composability of such operations—akin to how the REST standard has improved composability for disparate and individually developed services—purportedly without sacrificing any of the expressiveness of a more bespoke API.</p>
<p>The following summary is from the &ldquo;Discussion&rdquo; section:</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;In-Process REST in general and storage combinators in particular take an architectural style known to work well in the distributed case and scale it down to work in the non-distributed, local case in order to bring along the modularity benefits associated with that style.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>Many bespoke APIs are needlessly different from one another. It&rsquo;s an interesting idea to enforce API strictures akin to REST between software components running in the same memory space. What is a bit odd is their insistence on using Objective Smalltalk for all of their examples—a language that I&rsquo;d never even heard of (and I&rsquo;ve been paying attention). No-one is using this language [1] and its syntax is based on two of the bigger syntax boondoggles in our industry: Smalltalk and Objective-C. Due to this idiosyncratic choice, it&rsquo;s not always easy to distill the purpose from the examples.</p>
<p>Still, the storage combinators are interesting and end up being the &ldquo;In-process REST&rdquo; that the authors described in the citation above. Once they&rsquo;ve defined the basic storage API—<code>GET</code>, <code>PUT</code>, <code>PATCH</code>, and <code>DELETE</code>, they define a plethora of common behavior that transforms to it: switches, logging, caching, JSON, etc. From these components, they go on to define an HTTP server and client that communicate via a JSON protocol (naturally).</p>
<p>An interesting addendum is that they&rsquo;ve actually developed this approach in several industry projects that are in production, so it&rsquo;s not just an ivory-tower exercise without any real-world basis. I personally wonder how well the average developer can grok and work with a severely reduced API (in their eyes). That is, while it&rsquo;s definitely possible for a good programmer to build everything they need from these combinators (essentially first-principle building blocks), it&rsquo;s unclear to me whether that scales to a large enough base of actually existing developers. The approach is complete, but restrictive; it also makes it very difficult for developers to work with existing frameworks and profit from the documentation and community available there.</p>
<p>This possible downside aside, a positive effect was that developers wrote a lot less custom code, instead re-using the existing building blocks and creating their own. When they stayed focused on the compositional pattern, using the at-times very abstract building blocks, they did end up with a well-performing solution. A downside, as expected, was that, since the developers didn&rsquo;t write most of the code themselves <em>and</em> the building blocks are relatively highly abstracted, debugging was more difficult and <span class="quote-inline">&ldquo;it was often impossible to determine the dataflow path before runtime&rdquo;</span> and <span class="quote-inline">&ldquo;it would be difficult to debug, because a programmer has to step through the whole data transformation path during runtime&rdquo;</span>.</p>
<p>These are pitfalls associated with any highly generalized framework. They are not incidental problems to be taken care of in minor updates, but point to a possibly fatal flaw in an overgeneralized framework. [2] Despite many iterations, they seem to have landed on a highly generic implementation that cannot be easily used by mere mortals. My own experiences with developing frameworks have taught me to stay slightly less generic with the parts that mortal developers will come into contact with. It&rsquo;s not that they&rsquo;re not smart enough to get it, but that they will all have to learn from one of the masters, which doesn&rsquo;t scale well.</p>
<p>Instead, a slightly more redundant and not as highly generalized architecture tends to allow developers to build up local knowledge and synergies without constant &ldquo;herding&rdquo; by senior developers. They end with more code-duplication and are less able to benefit from performance improvements and bug fixes in common components, but they are able to work more autonomously—or even at all. The debugging and introspection issues mentioned above are kind of framework-killers as I don&rsquo;t really see a good way around them short of developing a highly targeted DSL with its own source-level debugger, IDE, etc.</p>
<p>The conclusion of the paper is a bit at odds with itself: on the one hand, it writes, </p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Their use correlates strongly with positive effects on code-size, performance, reliability and productivity, both observationally and in the minds of developers.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>But then immediately writes that,</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;One area of future research is how to type and statically type-check storage combinators. The same generic nature that makes storage combinators so composable also makes it difficult to verify when they are connected correctly.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>This seems kind of like a fatal flaw that the team has managed to patch with having good developers who intimately understand the framework—and probably with lots of debugging hours. Their next topic in the conclusion is about debugging and discusses a DSL as I mentioned above as a possible solution.</p>
<p>None of these things will be easy to implement or build and it&rsquo;s honestly unclear to me whether it even can be built without sacrificing the flexibility or the purity of the initial approach. In the end, you&rsquo;ll end up with a compromised system with bespoke everything and many, many idiosyncratic and poorly documented behaviors. And, since <em>everything&rsquo;s</em> bespoke, you can&rsquo;t lean on external communities and documentation and search for anything. I wish them the best of luck, but don&rsquo;t hold out much hope for the path that they&rsquo;re on.</p>
<p><hr></p>
<div class="footnote-reference"><span id="footnote_DRAFTABLE_ENTRY_3946_1_body" class="footnote-number">[1]</span> It doesn&rsquo;t have a Wiki page and the only <a href="http://objective.st">home page</a> I can find looks like it was built with Doxygen anno 1999 and the certificate isn&rsquo;t even valid.</div><div class="footnote-reference"><span id="footnote_DRAFTABLE_ENTRY_3946_2_body" class="footnote-number">[2]</span> While it&rsquo;s possible for an <em>underlying</em> framework to be this highly generalized, it&rsquo;s generally inefficient to have all of your developers working at this level—most of them aren&rsquo;t skilled enough to do so. That is, a framework can benefit from a high level of generalization that significantly reduces code-duplication, but that part has to very rarely be evident to mortal developers. Instead, they should float in a substrate of other APIs, that are more more straightforward to specify (i.e. high-level APIs that benefit from composability but don&rsquo;t necessarily <em>expose</em> it) and are more easily debugged and tested.</div><h2>Citations</h2><p>None.</p>
      </div>
      </div>
        <div class="footer">
    <div class="footer-data"><div class="footer-links"><ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/contact.php" title="">Contact</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/support.php" title="">Support</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/privacy.php" title="">Privacy</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/rights.php" title="">Rights</a></li></ul></div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="copyright">Copyright (c) 1999-2026 earthli.com. All Rights Reserved.</div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="versions">Powered by <ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore/app_news.php">earthli News 3.7</a></li><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore" title="">earthli WebCore&trade; 3.7</a></li></ul></div></div>    </div>
      </div>
  </div>  </body>
</html>
]]>
  </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
      <title type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[Why Events Are A Bad Idea (for high-concurrency servers) by Rob von Behren, Jeremy Condit and Eric Brewer (2003, read in 2020)]]>
  </title>
    <id>https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3948</id>
    <link href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3948"/>
    <updated>2020-04-13T17:05:27+02:00</updated>
    <author>
        <name type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[Marco von Ballmoos]]>
  </name>
      <uri>https://earthli.com/users/marco</uri>
    </author>
      <summary type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<blockquote class="quote abstract "><div>Disclaimer: these are notes I took while reading this book. They include citations I found interesting or enlightening or particularly well-written. In some cases, I&rsquo;ve pointed out which of these applies to which citation; in others, I have not. Any benefit you gain from reading these notes is... [<a class="complete-text-link" href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3948">More</a>]</div></blockquote>]]>
  </summary>
      <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<html lang="en">
  <head>
    <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/themes/ice.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/fonts/raleway.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/core/medium.css">
  </head>
  <body>
<div class="style-controls">  <div class="page">
    <div class="page-body">
<div class="info-box-top">
<p>
Published by <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_user.php?name=marco" title="Marco von Ballmoos" class="visible">marco</a> on <span class="date-time">13. Apr 2020 17:05:27 (GMT-5)</span>
</p>
<p>
Updated by <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_user.php?name=marco" title="Marco von Ballmoos" class="visible">marco</a> on <span class="date-time">13. Apr 2020 21:58:01 (GMT-5)</span>
</p>
</div>
      <div class="text-flow wide">
  <blockquote class="quote abstract "><div>Disclaimer: these are notes I took while reading this book. They include citations I found interesting or enlightening or particularly well-written. In some cases, I&rsquo;ve pointed out which of these applies to which citation; in others, I have not. Any benefit you gain from reading these notes is purely incidental to the purpose they serve of reminding me what I once read. Please see Wikipedia for a summary if I&rsquo;ve failed to provide one sufficient for your purposes. If my notes serve to trigger an interest in this book, then I&rsquo;m happy for you.</div></blockquote><p>This is an older <a href="https://people.eecs.berkeley.edu/~brewer/papers/threads-hotos-2003.pdf">paper (PDF)</a> (<cite><a href="http://people.eecs.berkeley.edu/">University of California at Berkeley</a></cite>) that discusses event-based systems (essentially cooperative multi-tasking) vs. threaded implementations (pre-emptive multi-tasking). The conclusion in this paper from 2003 (nearly 20 years ago) is that threads are hands-down easier to work with and offer the promised performance, <em>given that</em> the implementation is robust.</p>
<p>The fact that events vs. threads was still being discussed at the time was only due to very sub-standard threading implementations that engendered deadlocks, race-conditions and terrible performance. Modern threading implementations are based on OS constructs that trade memory for performance by storing a separate stack for each thread. Only the registers need to be switched out when switching threads/tasks.</p>
<p>It&rsquo;s interesting that one of the main arguments against threads was <span class="quote-inline">&ldquo;restrictive control flow&rdquo;</span> because that issue has now been nearly completely addressed by the <code>Promise</code>/<code>Future</code> pattern, encapsulated in an even easier-to-use syntax as <code>async</code>/<code>await</code> in languages like C#, JavaScript. TypeScript, and Rust. This paradigm abstracts subroutines without making any promises about how the code in those subroutines is executed.</p>
<p>Just from the keywords, it&rsquo;s obvious that the <em>idea</em> is to execute the code asynchronously, but it&rsquo;s not a requirement in all cases. The .NET literature is full of discussions of optimizations that balance a cooperative approach for quick &ldquo;bailout&rdquo; scenarios—where e.g. a value is available in constant time and doesn&rsquo;t actually necessitate a thread as it will never wait on any asynchronous I/O— to those that seamlessly grab a thread from a pool and schedule the code asynchronously (and preemptively) only if needed. Many of these different code-paths are even allocation-free in the .NET Core Runtime, leading to massive performance boosts versus older implementations.</p>
<p>Recently, the developers of Rust have written several interesting papers—and white-paper–length blogs—about the <code>async</code>/<code>await</code> implementation in Rust that go in the same directly: weighing the pros and cons of event-based vs. thread-based implementations.</p>
<p>The authors of this paper concluded with:</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Although event systems have been used to obtain good performance in high concurrency systems, we have shown that similar or even higher performance can be achieved with threads. Moreover, the simpler programming model and wealth of compiler analyses that threaded systems afford gives threads an important advantage over events when writing highly concurrent servers. In the future, we advocate tight integration between the compiler and the thread system, which will result in a programming model that offers a clean and simple interface to the programmer while achieving superior performance.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>And so it would come to be.</p>
<h2>Citations</h2><p>None.</p>
      </div>
      </div>
        <div class="footer">
    <div class="footer-data"><div class="footer-links"><ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/contact.php" title="">Contact</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/support.php" title="">Support</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/privacy.php" title="">Privacy</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/rights.php" title="">Rights</a></li></ul></div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="copyright">Copyright (c) 1999-2026 earthli.com. All Rights Reserved.</div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="versions">Powered by <ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore/app_news.php">earthli News 3.7</a></li><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore" title="">earthli WebCore&trade; 3.7</a></li></ul></div></div>    </div>
      </div>
  </div>  </body>
</html>
]]>
  </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
      <title type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[Robinson Crusoe by Daniel Defoe (1719, read in 2020)]]>
  </title>
    <id>https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3912</id>
    <link href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3912"/>
    <updated>2020-04-05T22:27:00+02:00</updated>
    <author>
        <name type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[Marco von Ballmoos]]>
  </name>
      <uri>https://earthli.com/users/marco</uri>
    </author>
      <summary type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<blockquote class="quote abstract "><div>Disclaimer: these are notes I took while reading this book. They include citations I found interesting or enlightening or particularly well-written. In some cases, I&rsquo;ve pointed out which of these applies to which citation; in others, I have not. Any benefit you gain from reading these notes is... [<a class="complete-text-link" href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3912">More</a>]</div></blockquote>]]>
  </summary>
      <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<html lang="en">
  <head>
    <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/themes/ice.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/fonts/raleway.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/core/medium.css">
  </head>
  <body>
<div class="style-controls">  <div class="page">
    <div class="page-body">
<div class="info-box-top">
<p>
Published by <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_user.php?name=marco" title="Marco von Ballmoos" class="visible">marco</a> on <span class="date-time">5. Apr 2020 22:27:00 (GMT-5)</span>
</p>
</div>
      <div class="text-flow wide">
  <blockquote class="quote abstract "><div>Disclaimer: these are notes I took while reading this book. They include citations I found interesting or enlightening or particularly well-written. In some cases, I&rsquo;ve pointed out which of these applies to which citation; in others, I have not. Any benefit you gain from reading these notes is purely incidental to the purpose they serve of reminding me what I once read. Please see Wikipedia for a summary if I&rsquo;ve failed to provide one sufficient for your purposes. If my notes serve to trigger an interest in this book, then I&rsquo;m happy for you.</div></blockquote><p>This is the story of a young, wealthy Englishman who leaves the comforts of his well-off family to seek his fortune on the high seas. His father warns him against it, telling him to instead find comfort in the warm cocoon of the upper middle-class.</p>
<p>Instead, his life takes him from well-off scion to dilettante sailor to slave to slave-owner (literally just assuming that his co-escapee, also a slave, would just continue to be <em>his</em> slave once they&rsquo;d escaped their common owner) to plantation owner to wannabe slave-trader to castaway to nearly incomprehensibly rich ship and island and plantation owner (through nearly no effort of his own, as he&rsquo;d been stranded for nearly three decades, doing literally nothing to grow the fortune that he mysteriously gets anyway).</p>
<p>Robinson embarks in August of 1651 and soon disembarks from a shipwreck, but safe in a harbor. He sets off again, but is beset by pirates, who take him captive and sell him to the north-African Moors as a slave. He is two years a slave before he can take a boat and escape along the coast of Africa, with fellow escapee Xury. They are finally taken in by a Portugese ship with a very generous and fair captain, who agrees to buy Xury and takes Crusoe to Brazil, depriving him of not one possession.</p>
<p>Crusoe doesn&rsquo;t at all question his assumed superiority to Xury, nor his right to sell him to the captain. That they consider him to be chattel does nothing at all to diminish their firm opinions that they are both good men.</p>
<p>Continuing to fail upward, Crusoe manages to parlay his minor fortune into a pretty major fortune. For a few years, he owns a plantation in Brazil before the wanderlust takes him again. In 1659, he agrees to head up an expedition to secure slaves from Africa for his and other plantations. Continuing his excellent seafaring luck, he shipwrecks about 40 miles out of the Orinoco river. No-one else survives.</p>
<p>The ship is still upright enough and is beached on a sandbar, close enough to shore to reach by swimming. The storm has abated. Crusoe makes several trips to the boat to retrieve supplies and float them back to the island.</p>
<p>He sets up life on the island, building a shelter, shooting goats and collecting water. A year in, he finds God. He explores the island, finding the other half to be much more hospitable, but is loath to move from what he now considers to be &ldquo;home&rdquo;, with its view of the sea and possible rescue.</p>
<p>He is inordinately terrified of &ldquo;cannibals&rdquo; and keeps his head down over years and even decades, with only his raving imaginings of potential attack to keep him company. E.g.,</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;[…] where are found the worst of savages; for they are cannibals or men-eaters, and fail not to murder and devour all the human bodies that fall into their hands.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>Obviously. For they’ve nothing better to do than lust after his precious rump roast. Further on, Defoe tries to give birth to a sentence, but can&rsquo;t find the end of it:</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Then, supposing they were not cannibals, yet they might kill me, as many Europeans who had fallen into their hands had been served, even when they had been ten or twenty together—much more I, that was but one, and could make little or no defence; all these things, I say, which I ought to have considered well; and did come into my thoughts afterwards, yet gave me no apprehensions at first, and my head ran mightily upon the thought of getting over to the shore.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>This sentence is a work of art. It’s convoluted to the point of incomprehensibility, seeming to have trapped the author into a whirlpool from which he can only escape via several awkward and completely nonsensical semicolons. Before that, though, he expresses his casual racism toward “cannibals”, who almost certainly don’t exist, and expresses a fear that they will kill him, although his countrymen have probably killed the islanders many hundreds of times more.</p>
<p>On page 147, he admits that <span class="quote-inline">&ldquo;I had lived there fifteen years now and had not met with the least shadow or figure of any people yet,&rdquo;</span> so he&rsquo;s not really in <em>imminent</em> danger. He goes through 18, then 23, then 24 years without seeing another soul (though he had seen a single footprint once, which terrified him, ruining his sleep, for <em>years</em>).</p>
<p>It is at this point, that he finally gets his &ldquo;Man Friday&rdquo;.</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;It came very warmly upon my thoughts, and indeed irresistibly, that now was the time to get me a servant, and, perhaps, a companion or assistant; and that I was plainly called by Providence to save this poor creature’s life.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>Of course, he&rsquo;s going to shower the man with his beneficence by allowing him to become his slave. Nearly a quarter-century of island-living has done nothing to dim his internalized attitude toward others and his belief in the superiority of Englishmen and their proper place at the top of whatever hierarchy they may find themselves in.</p>
<p>Luckily for our Englishman, the &ldquo;slave&rdquo; is very aware of his role and jumps in with gusto, as evidenced by the passage where they meet.</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;[…] and he came nearer and nearer, kneeling down every ten or twelve steps, in token of acknowledgment for saving his life.  I smiled at him, and looked pleasantly, and beckoned to him to come still nearer; at length he came close to me; and then he kneeled down again, kissed the ground, and laid his head upon the ground, and taking me by the foot, set my foot upon his head; this, it seems, was in token of swearing to be my slave for ever.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>I mean, obviously, this is hugely convenient, because our hero is doing the slave a favor of allowing him to be a slave, which he so clearly desperately wishes to be, in order to express his eternal gratitude to the obviously superior Englishman. It gets even more uncomfortable when he describes the man he&rsquo;s acquired. The description is basically slave-owner porn, reading more like the description of a beast of burden or a racehorse.</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;He was a comely, handsome fellow, perfectly well made, with straight, strong limbs, not too large; tall, and well-shaped; and, as I reckon, about twenty-six years of age.  He had a very good countenance, not a fierce and surly aspect, but seemed to have something very manly in his face; and yet he had all the sweetness and softness of a European in his countenance, too, especially when he smiled.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>He is saved from ugliness by having aspects of the Continent about him, thankfully. It goes on at length like this, ending two pages later in a repetition of the passage above, assuring the reader that the fealty is nearly entirely the idea of the slave.</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;At last he lays his head flat upon the ground, close to my foot, and sets my other foot upon his head, as he had done before; and after this made all the signs to me of subjection, servitude, and submission imaginable, to let me know how he would serve me so long as he lived.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>So porn-y. It reads like a teenage boy’s dream journal about ruling an island. On top  of that, we are reassured that, having found a new God to worship in the person of our narrator, Friday has no desires. No want to return to his people. Or to his wife or family. He is content to be with and to learn from his new God.</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;I began really to love the creature; and on his side I believe he loved me more than it was possible for him ever to love anything before&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>The love is mutual, but his is a love for a beast, whereas Friday&rsquo;s is the adoration of a God.</p>
<p>When more people show up, captives he and Friday rescue from cannibals and others who escape a mutiny that ends in shipwreck, our narrator reflects on his position, after over 27 years on the island.</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;My island was now peopled, and I thought myself very rich in subjects; and it was a merry reflection, which I frequently made, how like a king I looked.  First of all, the whole country was my own property, so that I had an undoubted right of dominion.  Secondly, my people were perfectly subjected—I was absolutely lord and lawgiver—they all owed their lives to me, and were ready to lay down their lives, if there had been occasion for it, for me. &rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>Again, this is like young-adult fiction, massaging the ego of the reader. It goes on at length like this, with the narrator expressing amazement at his own magnanimity in allowing everyone to practice the religion they preferred (and, of course, Friday, absolutely prefers the religion of our narrator).</p>
<p>He, of course, inherits the ship of the crew who he and Friday saved—because of course they would just give him everything in thanks. There are many passages of this sort, assuring the reader that everything truly is going to work out perfectly well for Crusoe.</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;He anticipated my proposals by telling me that both he and the ship, if recovered, should be wholly directed and commanded by me in everything; and if the ship was not recovered, he would live and die with me in what part of the world soever I would send him; and the two other men said the same.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>It&rsquo;s nice to be super-rich and only temporarily inconvenienced rather than made destitute or a slave (again, though the first time was nearly inconceivable).</p>
<p>An overland trip to bring his riches back to England from Madrid is kind of tacked on to the end of the book. He ends up with a tremendous fortune, with no-one cheating him out of anything and the world seemingly showering him with goods. Also, his overland journey has adventures, but he loses nothing. Also, the island is obviously acknowledged as belonging to him. He owns it and everyone who lives on it. He even <span class="quote-inline">&ldquo;sent seven women, being such as I found proper for service, or for wives to such as would take them,&rdquo;</span> breeding people like he did his goats when he still lived there.</p>
<p>The book shows its age, having no lasting philosophical statement that survives in the modern age. The writing style is convoluted and the prose is often quite childish in concept. I wouldn&rsquo;t read anything by Defoe again.</p>
<h2>Citations</h2><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;But as I had no instruments to take an observation to know what latitude we were in, and not exactly knowing, or at least remembering, what latitude they were in, I knew not where to look for them, or when to stand off to sea towards them; otherwise I might now easily have found some of these islands. &rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 24</div></div><p>So, basically, if he had any clue whatsoever as to his whereabouts, he would easily know where he was.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;In this manner I used to look upon my condition with the utmost regret.  I had nobody to converse with, but now and then this neighbour; no work to be done, but by the labour of my hands; and I used to say, I lived just like a man cast away upon some desolate island, that had nobody there but himself.  But how just has it been—and how should all men reflect, that when they compare their present conditions with others that are worse, Heaven may oblige them to make the exchange, and be convinced of their former felicity by their experience—I say, how just has it been, that the truly solitary life I reflected on, in an island of mere desolation, should be my lot, who had so often unjustly compared it with the life which I then led, in which, had I continued, I had in all probability been exceeding prosperous and rich.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 33</div></div><p>Wow. Just hugely and shockingly convoluted.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;was now infinitely beyond my poor neighbour—I mean in the advancement of my plantation; for the first thing I did, I bought me a negro slave, and an European servant also—I mean another besides that which the captain brought me from Lisbon.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 34</div></div><p>This is the story of a young scion who never has to worry about money. Everything works out. He just bought a slave like buying an ox.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;I descended a little on the side of that delicious vale, surveying it with a secret kind of pleasure, though mixed with my other afflicting thoughts, to think that this was all my own; that I was king and lord of all this country indefensibly, and had a right of possession; and if I could convey it, I might have it in inheritance as completely as any lord of a manor in England. &rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 94</div></div><p>Obviously.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;but if not, then it was the savage coast between the Spanish country and Brazils, where are found the worst of savages; for they are cannibals or men-eaters, and fail not to murder and devour all the human bodies that fall into their hands.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 102</div></div><p>Obviously. For they&rsquo;ve nothing better to do than lust after your precious rump roast.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;It might be truly said, that now I worked for my bread.  I believe few people have thought much upon the strange multitude of little things necessary in the providing, producing, curing, dressing, making, and finishing this one article of bread.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 110</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Then, supposing they were not cannibals, yet they might kill me, as many Europeans who had fallen into their hands had been served, even when they had been ten or twenty together—much more I, that was but one, and could make little or no defence; all these things, I say, which I ought to have considered well; and did come into my thoughts afterwards, yet gave me no apprehensions at first, and my head ran mightily upon the thought of getting over to the shore.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 117</div></div><p>This sentence is a work of art. It&rsquo;s convoluted to the point of incomprehensibility, seeming to have trapped the author into a whirlpool from which he can only escape via several awkward and completely nonsensical semicolons. Before that, though, he expresses his casual racism toward &ldquo;cannibals&rdquo;, who almost certainly don&rsquo;t exist, and expresses a fear that they will kill him, although his countrymen have probably killed the islanders many hundreds of times more.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;learned to look more upon the bright side of my condition, and less upon the dark side, and to consider what I enjoyed rather than what I wanted; and this gave me sometimes such secret comforts, that I cannot express them; and which I take notice of here, to put those discontented people in mind of it, who cannot enjoy comfortably what God has given them, because they see and covet something that He has not given them.  All our discontents about what we want appeared to me to spring from the want of thankfulness for what we have.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 122</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;But being now in the eleventh year of my residence, and, as I have said, my ammunition growing low, I set myself to study some art to trap and snare the goats, to see whether I could not catch some of them alive; and particularly I wanted a she-goat great with young. &rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 136</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;that to have seen one of my own species would have <strong class="highlight">seemed to me a[s]</strong> raising me from death to life, and the greatest blessing that Heaven&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 146</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;then reflected <strong class="highlight">that[,]</strong> as&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 147</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;place; that I had lived there fifteen years now and had not met with the least shadow or figure of any people yet&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 150</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;I knew I had been here now almost eighteen years, and never saw the least footsteps of human creature there before; and I might be eighteen years more as entirely concealed as I was now, if I did not discover myself to them, which I had no manner of occasion to do; it being my only business to keep myself entirely concealed where I was, unless I found a better sort of creatures than cannibals to make myself known to. &rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 155</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;It put me upon reflecting how little repining there would be among mankind at any condition of life if people would rather compare their condition with those that were worse, in order to be thankful, than be always comparing them with those which are better, to assist their murmurings and complainings.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 157</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;thought <strong class="highlight">[o]f digging</strong>&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 158</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;I was now in the twenty-third year of my residence in this island, and was so naturalised to the place and the manner of living, that, could I but have enjoyed the certainty that no savages would come to the place to disturb me, I could have been content to have capitulated for spending the rest of my time there, even to the last moment, till I had laid me down and died, like the old goat in the cave.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 168</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;As all these were but conjectures at best, so, in the condition I was in, I could do no more than look on upon the misery of the poor men, and pity them;&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 175</div></div><p>24 years: another shipwreck.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;It came very warmly upon my thoughts, and indeed irresistibly, that now was the time to get me a servant, and, perhaps, a companion or assistant; and that I was plainly called by Providence to save this poor creature’s life. &rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 189</div></div><p>25 years in.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;I beckoned to him again to come to me, and gave him all the signs of encouragement that I could think of; and he came nearer and nearer, kneeling down every ten or twelve steps, in token of acknowledgment for saving his life.  I smiled at him, and looked pleasantly, and beckoned to him to come still nearer; at length he came close to me; and then he kneeled down again, kissed the ground, and laid his head upon the ground, and taking me by the foot, set my foot upon his head; this, it seems, was in token of swearing to be my slave for ever.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 190</div></div><p>White-person porn.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;He was a comely, handsome fellow, perfectly well made, with straight, strong limbs, not too large; tall, and well-shaped; and, as I reckon, about twenty-six years of age.  He had a very good countenance, not a fierce and surly aspect, but seemed to have something very manly in his face; and yet he had all the sweetness and softness of a European in his countenance, too, especially when he smiled. &rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 192</div></div><p>It  goes on at length like this.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;At last he lays his head flat upon the ground, close to my foot, and sets my other foot upon his head, as he had done before; and after this made all the signs to me of subjection, servitude, and submission imaginable, to let me know how he would serve me so long as he lived. &rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 192</div></div><p>So porn-y. This reads like a teenage boy&rsquo;s dream journal.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;in which Friday worked not only very willingly and very hard, but did it very cheerfully: and I told him what it was for; that it was for corn to make more bread, because he was now with me, and that I might have enough for him and myself too. &rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 199</div></div><p>Friday has no desires. No want to return to his people. Or to his wife or family. He is content to be with and to learn from his new God.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Besides the pleasure of talking to him, I had a singular satisfaction in the fellow himself: his simple, unfeigned honesty appeared to me more and more every day, and I began really to love the creature; and on his side I believe he loved me more than it was possible for him ever to love anything before.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 199</div></div><p>Case in point.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;mused some time on this.  “Well, well,” says he, mighty affectionately, “that well—so you, I, devil, all wicked, all preserve, repent, God pardon all.”  Here I was run down again by him to the last degree; and it was a testimony to me, how the mere notions of nature,&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 204</div></div><p>I can&rsquo;t tell if Defoe is being sarcastic here about the supposed superiority of the Englishman.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;This observation of mine put a great many thoughts into me, which made me at first not so easy about my new man Friday as I was before; and I made no doubt but that, if Friday could get back to his own nation again, he would not only forget all his religion but all his obligation to me, and would be forward enough to give his countrymen an account of me, and come back, perhaps with a hundred or two of them, and make a feast upon me, at which he might be as merry as he used to be with those of his enemies when they were taken in war.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 209</div></div><p>Obligation.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;I was now entered on the seven-and-twentieth year of my captivity in this place; though the three last years that I had this creature with me ought rather to be left out of the account, my habitation being quite of another kind than in all the rest of the time. &rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 214</div></div><p>They&rsquo;ve Just finished building the boat with rudder and sail.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;My island was now peopled, and I thought myself very rich in subjects; and it was a merry reflection, which I frequently made, how like a king I looked.  First of all, the whole country was my own property, so that I had an undoubted right of dominion.  Secondly, my people were perfectly subjected—I was absolutely lord and lawgiver—they all owed their lives to me, and were ready to lay down their lives, if there had been occasion for it, for me.  It was remarkable, too, I had but three subjects, and they were of three different religions—my man Friday was a Protestant, his father was a Pagan and a cannibal, and the Spaniard was a Papist.  However, I allowed liberty of conscience throughout my dominions.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 225</div></div><p>Such a generous and benevolent God.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;He anticipated my proposals by telling me that both he and the ship, if recovered, should be wholly directed and commanded by me in everything; and if the ship was not recovered, he would live and die with me in what part of the world soever I would send him; and the two other men said the same. &rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 238</div></div><p>Oh c&rsquo;mon. This is childish.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;<strong class="highlight">of[f]</strong>&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 242</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;And thus I left the island, the 19th of December, as I found by the ship’s account, in the year 1686, after I had been upon it eight-and-twenty years, two months, and nineteen days; being delivered from this second captivity the same day of the month that I first made my escape in the long-boat from among the Moors of Sallee.  In this vessel, after a long voyage, I arrived in England the 11th of June, in the year 1687, having been thirty-five years absent.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 259</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Never was anything more honourable than the proceedings upon this procuration; for in less than seven months I received a large packet from the survivors of my trustees, the merchants, for whose account I went to sea, in which were the following,&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 264</div></div><p>Its nice to be super-rich and only temporarily inconvenienced rather than made destitute or a slave (again, though the first time was nearly inconceivable).</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;As soon as we came clear of the trees, which blinded us before, we saw clearly what had been the case, and how Friday had disengaged the poor guide, though we did not presently discern what kind of creature it was he had killed.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 273</div></div><p>Now they&rsquo;re traveling from Madrid to Languedoc/Gascony, fighting wolves and bears.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;In the meantime, I in part settled myself here; for, first of all, I married, and that not either to my disadvantage or dissatisfaction, and had three children, two sons and one daughter; but my wife dying, and my nephew coming home with good success from a voyage to Spain, my inclination to go abroad, and his importunity, prevailed, and engaged me to go in his ship as a private trader to the East Indies; this was in the year 1694.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 283</div></div><p>His wife of five years.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Besides this, I shared the lands into parts with them, reserved to myself the property of the whole, but gave them such parts respectively as they agreed on; and having settled all things with them, and engaged them not to leave the place, I left them there.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 284</div></div><p>Somehow everyone agrees that the island belongs to him as well</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;I sent seven women, being such as I found proper for service, or for wives to such as would take them. &rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 284</div></div><p>Wow. Breeds people like he breeds goats. Marriage for love is a modern invention.</p>
      </div>
      </div>
        <div class="footer">
    <div class="footer-data"><div class="footer-links"><ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/contact.php" title="">Contact</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/support.php" title="">Support</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/privacy.php" title="">Privacy</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/rights.php" title="">Rights</a></li></ul></div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="copyright">Copyright (c) 1999-2026 earthli.com. All Rights Reserved.</div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="versions">Powered by <ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore/app_news.php">earthli News 3.7</a></li><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore" title="">earthli WebCore&trade; 3.7</a></li></ul></div></div>    </div>
      </div>
  </div>  </body>
</html>
]]>
  </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
      <title type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[More Book Recommendations from Amazon]]>
  </title>
    <id>https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3923</id>
    <link href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3923"/>
    <updated>2020-03-22T15:51:44+01:00</updated>
    <author>
        <name type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[Marco von Ballmoos]]>
  </name>
      <uri>https://earthli.com/users/marco</uri>
    </author>
      <summary type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<p>I wrote <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3819">Book recommendations from Kindle</a> in October of 2019. Since then, the recommendations have not gotten any better.</p>
<p>The following three recommendations have been haunting me for a month.</p>
<p><span style="width: 150px; display: table" class=" align-left"><span class="auto-content-inline"><a href="https://www.earthli.com/data/news/attachments/entry/3923/img_7968.jpeg"><img src="https://www.earthli.com/data/news/attachments/entry/3923/img_7968_tn.jpeg" alt=" " style="width: 150px"></a></span><span class="auto-content-caption"><a href="https://www.earthli.com/data/news/attachments/entry/3923/img_7968.jpeg">How to Retire on Dividends</a></span></span><span style="width: 150px; display: table" class=" align-left"><span class="auto-content-inline"><a href="https://www.earthli.com/data/news/attachments/entry/3923/img_7952.jpeg"><img src="https://www.earthli.com/data/news/attachments/entry/3923/img_7952_tn.jpeg" alt=" " style="width: 150px"></a></span><span class="auto-content-caption"><a href="https://www.earthli.com/data/news/attachments/entry/3923/img_7952.jpeg">Her Cowboy Billionaire Best Friend</a></span></span><span style="width: 150px; display: table" class=" align-left"><span class="auto-content-inline"><a href="https://www.earthli.com/data/news/attachments/entry/3923/img_7967.jpeg"><img src="https://www.earthli.com/data/news/attachments/entry/3923/img_7967_tn.jpeg" alt=" " style="width: 150px"></a></span><span class="auto-content-caption"><a href="https://www.earthli.com/data/news/attachments/entry/3923/img_7967.jpeg">Devious Lies</a></span></span></p>
<p><span class="clear-both"></span>None of these makes any sense for me whatsoever. None of them comes even close to matching my reading... [<a class="complete-text-link" href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3923">More</a>]</p>
]]>
  </summary>
      <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<html lang="en">
  <head>
    <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/themes/ice.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/fonts/raleway.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/core/medium.css">
  </head>
  <body>
<div class="style-controls">  <div class="page">
    <div class="page-body">
<div class="info-box-top">
<p>
Published by <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_user.php?name=marco" title="Marco von Ballmoos" class="visible">marco</a> on <span class="date-time">22. Mar 2020 15:51:44 (GMT-5)</span>
</p>
</div>
      <div class="text-flow wide">
  <p>I wrote <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3819">Book recommendations from Kindle</a> in October of 2019. Since then, the recommendations have not gotten any better.</p>
<p>The following three recommendations have been haunting me for a month.</p>
<p><span style="width: 150px; display: table" class=" align-left"><span class="auto-content-inline"><a href="https://www.earthli.com/data/news/attachments/entry/3923/img_7968.jpeg"><img src="https://www.earthli.com/data/news/attachments/entry/3923/img_7968_tn.jpeg" alt=" " style="width: 150px"></a></span><span class="auto-content-caption"><a href="https://www.earthli.com/data/news/attachments/entry/3923/img_7968.jpeg">How to Retire on Dividends</a></span></span><span style="width: 150px; display: table" class=" align-left"><span class="auto-content-inline"><a href="https://www.earthli.com/data/news/attachments/entry/3923/img_7952.jpeg"><img src="https://www.earthli.com/data/news/attachments/entry/3923/img_7952_tn.jpeg" alt=" " style="width: 150px"></a></span><span class="auto-content-caption"><a href="https://www.earthli.com/data/news/attachments/entry/3923/img_7952.jpeg">Her Cowboy Billionaire Best Friend</a></span></span><span style="width: 150px; display: table" class=" align-left"><span class="auto-content-inline"><a href="https://www.earthli.com/data/news/attachments/entry/3923/img_7967.jpeg"><img src="https://www.earthli.com/data/news/attachments/entry/3923/img_7967_tn.jpeg" alt=" " style="width: 150px"></a></span><span class="auto-content-caption"><a href="https://www.earthli.com/data/news/attachments/entry/3923/img_7967.jpeg">Devious Lies</a></span></span></p>
<p><span class="clear-both"></span>None of these makes any sense for me whatsoever. None of them comes even close to matching my reading history. [1]</p>
<p>The bodice-rippers are just generic recommendations; the investment book is particularly laughable right now, in our time of COVID-inspired free-fall and an attendant complete reworking of the economy.</p>
<p>I guess the AIs aren&rsquo;t coming for us, after all. They can&rsquo;t even make a halfway-decent recommendation based on pretty extensive reading lists and history at Amazon.</p>
<p><hr></p>
<div class="footnote-reference"><span id="footnote_DRAFTABLE_ENTRY_3923_1_body" class="footnote-number">[1]</span> Or that of my wife, with whom I have a &ldquo;family plan&rdquo; at Amazon.</div>      </div>
      </div>
        <div class="footer">
    <div class="footer-data"><div class="footer-links"><ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/contact.php" title="">Contact</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/support.php" title="">Support</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/privacy.php" title="">Privacy</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/rights.php" title="">Rights</a></li></ul></div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="copyright">Copyright (c) 1999-2026 earthli.com. All Rights Reserved.</div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="versions">Powered by <ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore/app_news.php">earthli News 3.7</a></li><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore" title="">earthli WebCore&trade; 3.7</a></li></ul></div></div>    </div>
      </div>
  </div>  </body>
</html>
]]>
  </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
      <title type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[A Gentleman in Moscow by Amor Towles (2016, read in 2020)]]>
  </title>
    <id>https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3896</id>
    <link href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3896"/>
    <updated>2020-02-24T23:01:09+01:00</updated>
    <author>
        <name type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[Marco von Ballmoos]]>
  </name>
      <uri>https://earthli.com/users/marco</uri>
    </author>
      <summary type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<blockquote class="quote abstract "><div>Disclaimer: these are notes I took while reading this book. They include citations I found interesting or enlightening or particularly well-written. In some cases, I&rsquo;ve pointed out which of these applies to which citation; in others, I have not. Any benefit you gain from reading these notes is... [<a class="complete-text-link" href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3896">More</a>]</div></blockquote>]]>
  </summary>
      <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<html lang="en">
  <head>
    <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/themes/ice.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/fonts/raleway.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/core/medium.css">
  </head>
  <body>
<div class="style-controls">  <div class="page">
    <div class="page-body">
<div class="info-box-top">
<p>
Published by <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_user.php?name=marco" title="Marco von Ballmoos" class="visible">marco</a> on <span class="date-time">24. Feb 2020 23:01:09 (GMT-5)</span>
</p>
</div>
      <div class="text-flow wide">
  <blockquote class="quote abstract "><div>Disclaimer: these are notes I took while reading this book. They include citations I found interesting or enlightening or particularly well-written. In some cases, I&rsquo;ve pointed out which of these applies to which citation; in others, I have not. Any benefit you gain from reading these notes is purely incidental to the purpose they serve of reminding me what I once read. Please see Wikipedia for a summary if I&rsquo;ve failed to provide one sufficient for your purposes. If my notes serve to trigger an interest in this book, then I&rsquo;m happy for you.</div></blockquote><p>This book should appeal to anyone who reads for the pleasure of reading. Towles has a knack for describing the world that, even when not impelling the story, is still so very much fun to read. The revolution of 1917 and its aftermath of Bolshevik lack of appreciation for culture is a background, but it doesn&rsquo;t figure strongly in the first third of the book. In fact, for the first third of the book, the story meanders, but doesn&rsquo;t really head anywhere. </p>
<p>Instead, we are treated to a history of Russia and its idea of itself as well as its place in the world, as viewed by a man who is unable to leave the Hotel Metropol—a luxury hotel whose purpose is at-times at odds with the purpose of the revolutionary government. It is a place that suits the gentleman&rsquo;s sensibilities, but not those of the new leaders of the Soviet Union.</p>
<p>In the introduction, we learn that Count Alexander Ilyich Rostov is to be confined to the Hotel Metropol as punishment for having been born noble. He is neither exiled nor killed because of a famous revolutionary poem attributed to him. He had been living there for a year already, after having returned from Paris after the revolution. Why did he return when nobility like him were the deposed minority former rulers? Because he is Russian and he belongs in Russia, damn the consequences for his &ldquo;kind&rdquo;.</p>
<p>We visit the hotel with the Count, going through his rituals and routines at both the fancy and more pedestrian restaurants, the barber, the seamstress and so on. The Count makes nine-year–old Nina Kulikova&rsquo;s acquaintance and watches her grow up in the hotel. After a while, she is forced to move on, but she leaves him her passepartout with which he is able to explore much more of the hotel.</p>
<p>At the same time, the Count takes a job as the head waiter of the Boyarsky, the fancy restaurant on the second floor of the Metropol. He makes great friends with what would become the other two members of the &ldquo;Triumvirate&rdquo;: Emile, the chef, and Andrey, the maître&rsquo;d. They tell magnificent stories. At the same time, he begins a relationship with the beguiling, intelligent, and beautiful actress Anna Urbanova.</p>
<p>Mischka, the Count&rsquo;s friend from old days, makes good headway in the new regime, putting the finishing touches on a multi-book biography of Pushkin. He is asked to remove a sentence from one letter in the third volume in which Pushkin exclaimed over the glory of German bread, comparing it to the highly unfavorable and inadequate Russian variant. Mischka at first acquiesces, but then returns in a rage, offended to the core. He would pay for his principles with eight years of hard labor and then the &ldquo;Minus Six&rdquo; punishment: he would be free to travel in all of Russia minus the six great cities. The Count would see his friend only once or twice more.</p>
<p>The Count&rsquo;s services are engaged by a Georgian Colonel Osip, who needs his erudition to learn how to deal with the outside world. The Count teaches him English and French as well as the cultures of the French, British and the Americans. Over 15 years, they become fast friends, reading many books and watching many films together. Osip is fascinated by the subversiveness and open nihilism of film noir, wondering how it is that the western governments allow it to exist. He has not quite grasped that while the Soviet was about overt suppression, America was about <em>distraction</em>. Orwell&rsquo;s vision vs. Huxley&rsquo;s.</p>
<p>Years later, Nina returns. She was a serious child and grew into a serious worker, intent on doing her part to further the revolution&rsquo;s aim. Now, having married and had a child five years ago, she is there to ask the Count to watch her child while she searches for her husband, who&rsquo;s been carted off to Siberia. She is loath to take her daughter Sofia with her, though. Would Alexander be willing to watch her for a few weeks or months until she can send for her? Of course he can. No question. He would never see Nina again.</p>
<p>In due course, the Count&rsquo;s suave demeanor and worldly knowledge attract the attention of an American Aide-de-camp Richard Vanderwhile. They hit it off immediately and also become friends. On one side, there is Osip, whose power and rank are only hinted at and now there is Richard, on the other side, also nearly certainly more powerful than he at first seems.</p>
<p>Sofia is 13 years old. She has an accident playing a game with the Count—she falls down service stairs trying to race him to their apartment. He carries her to a hospital, breaking his imprisonment. His friend Osip swoops in and smooths things over, sending him back to the Metropol and assuring him that Sofia will have the best care and will recover fully.</p>
<p>Sofia is now 17 years old. She is still living with the Count at the Metropol. It is after WWII, nearly 1950. The Count is now 61 years old.</p>
<p>The orchestra conductor at the hotel discovered Sofia&rsquo;s talent for piano. Over the next few years, he nurtures what is clearly not just a talent, but an absolute gift for music, for putting pathos and feeling into musical pieces of which adults several times her age are incapable. The Count is understandably proud that Sofia is excelling on all fronts.</p>
<p>Rostov and his troika (Emile and Andrei) are forced to take up the master of the hotel (the Bishop, formerly the most terrible waiter in the second-class restaurant and now promoted through an innate talent for sycophancy and adherence to party cant) into their meetings, making them altogether less enjoyable. Life continues. The Count&rsquo;s decades-long relationship with Anna continues and grows. Stalin dies. The country shivers in the power vacuum.</p>
<p>Things for the Count come to a head when Sofia is invited to play in Paris in six months time, sometime in the late 50s. The Count prepares assiduously for her defection—and his own escape from the hotel. He takes his leave silently and with masterful planning and execution, rolling with a few kinks thrown into the plan by the Bishop, who gets his comeuppance, while the rest of his friends get richly rewarded with the remainder of his gold fortune that he&rsquo;d kept stashed away for decades in cleverly contrived compartments in the legs of his desk.</p>
<p>Sofia puts on a spectacular show in Paris, then defects to the U.S. embassy, meeting up with Richard Vanderwhile and getting the large part of Rostov&rsquo;s fortune hand-delivered to her then. The Count ranges into the Russian countryside, having fooled the authorities with a clever subterfuge into thinking that he&rsquo;d escaped over the border into Finland. In a rustic inn, he meets up with Anna Urbanova, once again free to live out the remainder of his life with the woman he loves in the country he loves.</p>
<p>Osip&rsquo;s favorite movies is <em>Casablanca</em>—a movie that he watched with the Count many times. When we see him in a final scene, in the Kremlin, in the office of the chief of the KGB, behind the desk, he has just heard of the Count&rsquo;s escape and Sofia&rsquo;s disappearance, to which he replies: <span class="quote-inline">&ldquo;Round up the usual suspects.&rdquo;</span></p>
<p>The Count is a gracious and polite man, relatively well-read, and of indeterminate age. The writing is lovely and appeals to my dilettantish Russophile tendencies. Towles makes references to streets in Moscow and St. Petersburg (Leningrad) and to moments in history and literature (Gogol&rsquo;s Nose and Tolstoy&rsquo;s Borodino and, of course, to Pushkin and Chekhov) that ring authentic for me.</p>
<p>Despite having been &ldquo;trapped&rdquo; in the Metropol Hotel for most of his adult life, Rostov&rsquo;s rich inner life, philosophy and discipline allow him to consider himself to be &ldquo;the luckiest man in Russia&rdquo;.</p>
<h2>Citations</h2><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Vyshinsky: Why did you write the poem? Rostov: It demanded to be written. I simply happened to be sitting at the particular desk on the particular morning when it chose to make its demands.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 4</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;What a marvel it had been to discover the table that folded away without a trace; and the drawers built into the base of the bed; and the wall-mounted lamps just large enough to illuminate a page. This efficiency of design was music to the young mind. It attested to a precision of purpose and the promise of adventure.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 15</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The three of them exhibited the same bewildered gaze that the Count had noticed on the faces of Arkady and Valentina a few hours before, and finally it struck him: When he had been carted off that morning, they had all assumed that he would never return. He had emerged from behind the walls of the Kremlin like an aviator from the wreckage of a crash.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 16</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;On the Grand Duke’s desk stood a champagne flute and a brandy snifter. With the lean uprightness of the former looking down upon the squat rotundity of the latter, one could not help but think of Don Quixote and Sancho Panza on the plains of the Sierra Morena.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 20</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;On the Grand Duke’s desk stood a champagne flute and a brandy snifter. With the lean uprightness of the former looking down upon the squat rotundity of the latter, one could not help but think of Don Quixote and Sancho Panza on the plains of the Sierra Morena. Or of Robin Hood and Friar Tuck in the shadows of Sherwood Forest. Or of Prince Hal and Falstaff before the gates of—&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 20</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The books the bellhops had lugged to the attic had been his father’s and, devoted as they were to studies of rational philosophy and the science of modern agriculture, each promised heft and threatened impenetrability.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 22</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;“Thank you for the thought, Andrey. Normally, I would leap at the chance. But tonight, I am otherwise committed.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 28</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;But as the Count advanced through Essays Eleven, Twelve, and Thirteen, his goal seemed to recede into the distance. It was suddenly as if the book were not a dining room table at all, but a sort of Sahara. And having emptied his canteen, the Count would soon be crawling across its sentences with the peak of each hard-won page revealing but another page beyond.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 32</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Coming off the wide marble steps that descended from the lobby, one first passed the newsstand, which offered a gentleman a hundred headlines, albeit now just in Russian.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 33</div></div><p>This makes me appreciate how in our Kiosks, you find content in at least half a dozen languages, with only half of the prominently displayed newspapers in the rotating rack in German. Many are in Turkish or French.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Here, indeed, was a formidable sentence—one that was on intimate terms with the comma, and that held the period in healthy disregard.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 68</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;But Fate would not have the reputation it has if it simply did what it seemed it would do.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 80</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;having torn through the first fifty pages of Herr Flammenhescher’s little monograph, Mikhail would leap to his feet and start pacing from corner to corner in order to voice his fervid agreement or furious dissent with the author’s thesis, his style, or his use of punctuation.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 80</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;But events can unfold in such a manner that overnight the man out of step finds himself in the right place at the right time. The fashions and attitudes that had seemed so alien to him are suddenly swept aside and supplanted by fashions and attitudes in perfect sympathy with his deepest sentiments. Then, like a lone sailor adrift for years on alien seas, he wakes one night to discover familiar constellations overhead.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 86</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;As midnight approached, the Rostov siblings would stumble from their second or third visit in search of their sleigh. Their laughter would echo under the stars and their steps would weave in wide curves back and forth across the straight tracks that they had made upon their arrival—such that in the morning their hosts would find the giant figure of a G clef transcribed by their boots in the snow.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 89</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The Rioja? Now there was a wine that would clash with the stew as Achilles clashed with Hector. It would slay the dish with a blow to the head and drag it behind its chariot until it tested the fortitude of every man in Troy. Besides, it plainly cost three times what the young man could afford.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 97</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Setting the empty box aside, the Count nodded again to the cat, pulled the strands of the second bow, and lifted the second lid . . . only to discover a third box. Dutifully, the Count repeated the debowing and unlidding with the next three boxes, until he held one the size of a matchbox. But when he untied the bow and lifted the lid on this box, inside the cozy chamber, strung on a bit of the dark green ribbon, was Nina’s passkey to the hotel.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 103</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;And as she talked, the Count had to acknowledge once again the virtues of withholding judgment. After all, what can a first impression tell us about someone we’ve just met for a minute in the lobby of a hotel? For that matter, what can a first impression tell us about anyone? Why, no more than a chord can tell us about Beethoven, or a brushstroke about Botticelli. By their very nature, human beings are so capricious, so complex, so delightfully contradictory, that they deserve not only our consideration, but our reconsideration—and our unwavering determination to withhold our opinion until we have engaged with them in every possible setting at every possible hour.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 120</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;[…] here in suite 208 in the company of charred lemons, French wine, and memories of the sea,&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 121</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Yes, a ghost, thought the Count, as he moved silently down the hall. Like Hamlet’s father roaming the ramparts of Elsinore after the midnight watch . . . Or like Akaky Akakievich, that forsaken spirit of Gogol’s who in the wee hours haunted the Kalinkin Bridge in search of his stolen coat&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 123</div></div><p>I&rsquo;ve actually read both <em>Macbeth</em> and <em>The Overcoat</em>.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;“When the lilacs are in bloom, the bees’ll buzz to the Alexander Gardens and the honey’ll taste like the lilacs. But in a week or so, they’ll be buzzing to the Garden Ring, and then you’ll be tasting the cherry trees.” “The Garden Ring! How far will they go?” “Some say a bee’ll cross the ocean for a flower,” answered the old man with a smile. “Though I’ve never known one to do so.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 128</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;So as the summer sun began to rise, the fire began to die, and the bees began to circle overhead, the two men spoke of days from their childhoods when the wagon wheels rattled in the road, and the dragonflies skimmed the grass, and the apple trees blossomed for as far as the eye could see.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 128</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The Nizhny Novgorod Province had a hundred prominent families, which over the course of two centuries had intermarried and divorced, borrowed and lent, accepted and regretted, offended, defended, and dueled—while championing an array of conflicting positions that varied by generation, gender, and house. And at the center of this maelstrom was the Countess Rostova’s dining room with its two tables for twenty standing side by side.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 138</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;[…] the Count reviewed the menu in reverse order as was his habit, having learned from experience that giving consideration to appetizers before entrées can only lead to regrets. And here was a perfect example. For the very last item on the menu was the evening’s sole necessity: osso buco—a dish that was best preceded by a light and lively appetizer.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 139</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;For years now, with a bit of a smile, the Count had remarked that this or that was behind him—like his days of poetry or travel or romance. But in so doing, he had never really believed it. In his heart of hearts, he had imagined that, even if unattended to, these aspects of his life were lingering somewhere on the periphery, waiting to be recalled. But looking at the bottle in his hand, the Count was struck by the realization that, in fact, it was all behind him. Because the Bolsheviks, who were so intent upon recasting the future from a mold of their own making, would not rest until every last vestige of his Russia had been uprooted, shattered, or erased.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 144</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The staffing trend that had begun with the appointment of the Bishop had continued unabated—such that any young man with more influence than experience could now don the white jacket, clear from the left, and pour wine into water glasses.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 154</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;I have no doubt, mein Herr, that your remark regarding Russia’s contributions to the West was a form of inverted hyperbole—an exaggerated diminution of the facts for poetic effect.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 156</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Can you conceive of a work greater in scope than War and Peace? One that moves so deftly from the parlor to the battlefield and back again? That so fully investigates how the individual is shaped by history, and history by the individual?&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 157</div></div><p>Although he published a long essay arguing _against_ the idea/concept/conceit of the great man in history.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;the elixir dissolved on his tongue, the Count became aware of something else entirely. Rather than the flowering trees of central Moscow, the honey had a hint of a grassy riverbank . . . the trace of a summer breeze . . . a suggestion of a pergola. . . . But most of all, there was the unmistakable essence of a thousand apple trees in bloom. Abram was nodding his head.</p>
<p>&ldquo;“Nizhny Novgorod,” he said. And it was. Unmistakably so.</p>
<p>&ldquo;“All these years, they must have been listening to us,” Abram added in a whisper.</p>
<p>&ldquo;The Count and the handyman both looked toward the roof’s edge where the bees, having traveled over a hundred miles and applied themselves in willing industry, now wheeled above their hives as pinpoints of blackness, like the inverse of stars.&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 166</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;“Ah,” said Emile with the grim smile of the commander who prefers to be outnumbered.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 177</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;at the very moment that he recognized his old friend’s script, a lady with a lapdog rose from his favorite chair between the potted palms. Ever respectful of Fate, the Count postponed his visit to the seamstress, claimed his seat, and opened the letter.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 182</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;But art is the most unnatural minion of the state. Not only is it created by fanciful people who tire of repetition even more quickly than they tire of being told what to do, it is also vexingly ambiguous. Just when a carefully crafted bit of dialogue is about to deliver a crystal-clear message, a hint of sarcasm or the raising of an eyebrow can spoil the entire effect. In fact, it can give credence to a notion that is the exact opposite of that which was intended. So, perhaps it is understandable that governing authorities are bound to reconsider their artistic preferences every now and then, if for no other reason than to keep themselves fit.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 192</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;For having fallen suddenly from grace, those in the Confederacy share a certain perspective. Knowing beauty, influence, fame, and privilege to be borrowed rather than bestowed, they are not easily impressed. They are not quick to envy or take offense. They certainly do not scour the papers in search of their own names. They remain committed to living among their peers, but they greet adulation with caution, ambition with sympathy, and condescension with an inward smile.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 196</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Now that was the life of the Boyarsky—a battle that must be waged with exacting precision while giving the impression of effortlessness, every single night of the year.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 203</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;“You have me at a disadvantage.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 207</div></div><p>I was waiting for this sentence.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;“The surest way to insult a Walloon is to mistake him for a Frenchman, though they live but a few miles apart and share the same language.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 207</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;The Count took a sip of his wine and returned the glass to the table.</p>
<p>&ldquo;“You are almost certainly from eastern Georgia.”</p>
<p>&ldquo;The captain sat up with an expression of enthusiasm.</p>
<p>&ldquo;“Extraordinary. Do I have an accent?” “Not that’s distinguishable. But then armies, like universities, are where accents are most commonly shed.”</p>
<p>&ldquo;“Then why eastern Georgia?”</p>
<p>&ldquo;The Count gestured to the wine. “Only an eastern Georgian would start his meal with a bottle of Rkatsiteli.”</p>
<p>&ldquo;“Because he’s a hayseed?”</p>
<p>&ldquo;“Because he misses home.”&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 207</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Life has been generous to me in its variety.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 208</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;“As both a student of history and a man devoted to living in the present, I admit that I do not spend a lot of time imagining how things might otherwise have been. But I do like to think there is a difference between being resigned to a situation and reconciled to it.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 211</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;With limited instruction, he had perfected the art of withholding his insights, forgoing his witticisms, curbing the use of metaphors, similes, and analogies—in essence, exercising every muscle of poetic restraint. In fact, if the reporters whom he was dutifully transcribing had only seen his handiwork, they would have taken off their hats, bowed their heads, and acknowledged that here was a master of objectivity.]&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 214 (Writing of the little grey functionary in a footnote.)</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;“Ah. The man of letters has lost his pen. Where is it now . . . , hmm? If not in the kitchen, perhaps you should look in the blue pagoda of your fine Chinoiserie.” And turning with his smirk, the Bishop slipped diagonally down the hall.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 218</div></div><p>Calling back to the Count&rsquo;s poem.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;“What is a man supposed to do when confronted with such madness? I struck the passage out. Then I walked from the room without a word.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 265</div></div><p>Leave it in. Let someone else strike it. While my life might be worth nothing to you, and understandably so, my principles are worth everything to me. If, for whatever bizarre reason, it is my imprimatur that is important to you, then you won&rsquo;t get it.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;It could have been a tale from Gogol with Shalamov playing the part of a well-fed privy councillor impressed by his own rank. And the offending passage, hearing of its pending fate, could have climbed out a window and escaped down an alley never to be heard from again—that is, until it reappeared ten years later on the arm of a French countess, wearing a pince-nez and the Légion d’honneur.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 265</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;“The future of Russian poetry is the haiku!” Mishka shouted in conclusion, then, with great satisfaction, he slammed the door on his way out. In fact, so satisfying was this gesture that he slammed every door that stood between him and the street below.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 270</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Naturally, the Count had watched in recent years as age began to take its toll on the Triumvirate. He had noticed the occasional tremor in Andrey’s left hand and the creeping deafness in Emile’s right ear. He had noticed the graying of the former’s hair and the thinning of the latter’s. But with Mishka, here were not simply the ravages of time. Here were the marks of one man upon another, of an era upon its offspring.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 287</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;“Do you know that back in ’30, when they announced the mandatory collectivization of farming, half our peasants slaughtered their own livestock rather than give them up to the cooperatives? Fourteen million head of cattle left to the buzzards and flies.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 290</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;do you think the achievements of the Americans—envied the world over—came without a cost? Just ask their African brothers. And do you think the engineers who designed their illustrious skyscrapers or built their highways hesitated for one moment to level the lovely little neighborhoods that stood in their way? I guarantee you, Alexander, they laid the dynamite and pushed the plungers themselves. As I’ve said to you before, we and the Americans will lead the rest of this century because we are the only nations who have learned to brush the past aside instead of bowing before it. But where they have done so in service of their beloved individualism, we are attempting to do so in service of the common good.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 297</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;And where Nina would not hesitate to cut someone off in midassertion in order to make a contrary point and then declare the matter decided once and for all, Sofia would listen so attentively and with such a sympathetic smile that her interlocutor, having been given free rein to express his views at considerable length, often found his voice petering out as he began to question his own premises. . . .&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 321</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;One could spend a lifetime mastering the technical aspects of the piano and never achieve a state of musical expression—that alchemy by which the performer not only comprehends the sentiments of the composer, but somehow communicates them to her audience through the manner of her play.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 325</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Opening the narrow glass door in the clock’s cabinet, the Count reached inside and found the little key still on its hook. Inserting it into the keyhole, the Count wound the clock to its limit, set the time, and gave the pendulum a nudge, thinking: Let the old man keep time for a few hours more.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 348</div></div><p>We had a clock like that, growing up. Mom always kept it wound and ticking.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;"But in the end, it has been the inconveniences that have mattered to me most.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 352</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;But ever since the Count had become headwaiter of the Boyarsky, its customers could expect their server to look them in the eye, answer their questions, offer recommendations, and flawlessly record their preferences—without ever taking his hands from behind his back.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 355</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;When the Count had quietly closed the door, he turned to Anna, whose expression was unusually grave. “When did the Minister of Culture start taking a personal interest in Sofia?” he asked. “Tomorrow afternoon,” she replied. “At the latest.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 366</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;“Someone has told you about my conversation with Director Vavilov.” The Count rearranged his fork and knife, which had somehow become misaligned. “I may have heard something from someone,” he said noncommittally.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 386</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Now it was luminescence that was moving across the city, growing closer and closer, until the windows of the Kremlin flashed on followed by the chandelier overhead—and the combined dinner of the Presidium and the Council of Ministers erupted into justified applause. For, in fact, the lights of the city seemed to burn brighter with the electricity from the first nuclear power plant in the world.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 414</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Given the tightness of security at the railway crossing into Finland, it is presumed that Rostov disembarked in Vyborg in order to cross the border on foot.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 457</div></div><p>That&rsquo;s How Lenin got back in. And John Reed as well.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;“No, sir. There is nothing else. But how shall we proceed?” The Chief Administrator considered this question for a moment and then, leaning back in his chair with the barest hint of a smile, replied: “Round up the usual suspects.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 458</div></div><p>From Casablanca.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;But in setting upright the cocktail glass in the aftermath of the commotion, didn’t he also exhibit an essential faith that by the smallest of one’s actions one can restore some sense of order to the world?&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 459</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;And there in the corner, at a table for two, her hair tinged with gray, the willowy woman waited.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 462</div></div>      </div>
      </div>
        <div class="footer">
    <div class="footer-data"><div class="footer-links"><ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/contact.php" title="">Contact</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/support.php" title="">Support</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/privacy.php" title="">Privacy</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/rights.php" title="">Rights</a></li></ul></div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="copyright">Copyright (c) 1999-2026 earthli.com. All Rights Reserved.</div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="versions">Powered by <ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore/app_news.php">earthli News 3.7</a></li><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore" title="">earthli WebCore&trade; 3.7</a></li></ul></div></div>    </div>
      </div>
  </div>  </body>
</html>
]]>
  </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
      <title type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[Unauthorized Bread by Cory Doctorow (2019, read in 2020)]]>
  </title>
    <id>https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3903</id>
    <link href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3903"/>
    <updated>2020-02-23T12:53:13+01:00</updated>
    <author>
        <name type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[Marco von Ballmoos]]>
  </name>
      <uri>https://earthli.com/users/marco</uri>
    </author>
      <summary type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<blockquote class="quote abstract "><div>Disclaimer: these are notes I took while reading this book. They include citations I found interesting or enlightening or particularly well-written. In some cases, I&rsquo;ve pointed out which of these applies to which citation; in others, I have not. Any benefit you gain from reading these notes is... [<a class="complete-text-link" href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3903">More</a>]</div></blockquote>]]>
  </summary>
      <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<html lang="en">
  <head>
    <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/themes/ice.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/fonts/raleway.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/core/medium.css">
  </head>
  <body>
<div class="style-controls">  <div class="page">
    <div class="page-body">
<div class="info-box-top">
<p>
Published by <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_user.php?name=marco" title="Marco von Ballmoos" class="visible">marco</a> on <span class="date-time">23. Feb 2020 12:53:13 (GMT-5)</span>
</p>
</div>
      <div class="text-flow wide">
  <blockquote class="quote abstract "><div>Disclaimer: these are notes I took while reading this book. They include citations I found interesting or enlightening or particularly well-written. In some cases, I&rsquo;ve pointed out which of these applies to which citation; in others, I have not. Any benefit you gain from reading these notes is purely incidental to the purpose they serve of reminding me what I once read. Please see Wikipedia for a summary if I&rsquo;ve failed to provide one sufficient for your purposes. If my notes serve to trigger an interest in this book, then I&rsquo;m happy for you.</div></blockquote><p><a href="https://arstechnica.com/gaming/2020/01/unauthorized-bread-a-near-future-tale-of-refugees-and-sinister-iot-appliances/">Unauthorized Bread</a> by <cite>Cory Doctorow</cite> (<cite><a href="http://arstechnica.com/">Ars Technica</a></cite>) is a novella describing a near-future (or perhaps alternate present) that could really only happen in the United States. Hyper-capitalism has proceeded to a point where private industry has extended its tendrils into all aspects of the pitiful excuse for a social contract the state even bothers to extend to the overwhelming majority of its population.</p>
<p>The story is about Salima, an immigrant bouncing around the system, trying to get her feet under her. She befriends Nalifa, an Eritrean immigrant with two children, at an internment camp. After a couple of years, they get an &ldquo;opportunity&rdquo; to get cheaper housing in a building called Dorchester Towers. </p>
<p>This building offers reduced-rate housing in exchange for being able to build much higher than the local building codes would allow. There is a rich section and a handful of floors—35 to 42—reserved for the poor. The elevators prefer the rich. The poor are forced to walk in the morning, when the 45-minute wait for an elevator would make them late for already-precarious jobs. In the evening, they tend to just wait rather than walking up 35 flights.</p>
<p>There is no air-conditioning in the poor half of the entryway to the building. Security guards keep the riff-raff out. The apartments are small, but decent. However, none of their appliances are theirs: the toaster only cooks approved foods; the dishwasher only washes approved dishes; the refrigerator only hold approved foods. These foods are, of course, more expensive and nutritionally worse than the more &ldquo;ethnic&rdquo; food that most of the residents would prefer.</p>
<p>The story is of the failure of the web of companies—one among them being <em>Boulangism</em>, which makes the toaster—that were responsible for maintaining the servers with which all of the appliances communicated in order to function. So the poor floors are left without an oven too cook in and without a dishwasher to wash dishes in and a refrigerator that refuses food.</p>
<p>Salima learns how to hack on the Darknet—using an old notebook rather than the &lsquo;fridge (which is the main way most people access information). She hacks her own appliances and gets not only food and a working dishwasher, but a degree of autonomy and control over her own life. She helps the rest of the poor part of the building free themselves as well. They all benefit, as they can now buy cheaper and healthier supplies rather than the corporate foods.</p>
<p>In her travels to accounting clients (she&rsquo;s an accountant for small businesses, doing quite well for herself, actually), she meets Wye, a programmer working for the company that acquired the husk of Boulangism and is working very hard to get things back online—and providing, once again, money for the corporation.</p>
<p>Wye is sympathetic, but is also initially callous, not even really understanding how terrible it is for a system to force people to use such appliances and then to just drop them for months, making it illegal for them to make other arrangements, despite the state and corporation having failed to hold up its end of the bargain at all.</p>
<p>When the software comes online, though, it will detect all of the hacked software and pinpoint Dorchester Towers as a &ldquo;bunch of cheaters&rdquo;. Salima desperately tries to put things back the way they were, killing the budding revolution in the cradle, afraid (quite rightly) that the powers-that-be will exact a terrible punishment. Once she has converted all of the apartments back, she discovers a better way: run a VM in the devices that pretends to be a conforming device, but which runs another copy of a non-confirming and hacked OS.</p>
<p>Though the company tries to get Salima to work with them, essentially betraying her own class, Salima holds strong. At first Wye is disappointed, but she comes around and works, in the end, to help Salima continue to subvert any anti-hacking measures that the company employs.</p>
<h2>Citations</h2><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;But there was another world, vast beyond her knowing, of people who didn’t know her at all, but who held her life in their hands.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The soldiers and cops and guards who pointed guns at her, barked orders at her. The bureaucrats she never saw who rejected her paperwork for cryptic reasons she could only guess at, and the bureaucrats who looked her in the eye and rejected her paperwork and refused to explain themselves.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The elevator captains had been a good chuckle, a way for everyone from the poor-doors and the poor-floors to feel like they were mice outsmarting the cats. The letters put them in their place: roaches, facing exterminators.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;This was the antidote, she realized, to the feeling of distant people whom she’d never meet who held the power of everything over her. To be able to control the computers around her, rather than being controlled by them.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;But with both companies bankrupt, they won’t be expecting any new money. Now, if the companies do ever come back from bankruptcy and still no one here is using their products…”&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>Only in America would it be even conceivable to write a feasible story about subsidized housing without a kitchen.</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;It was also scary to hear them uttered aloud, and scarier still to think of the level of recklessness the kids had exhibited, even though they’d understood those stakes.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>They can recite them, but don&rsquo;t understand them.</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;What did these kids think about the appliances they jailbroke? Did they see them as just weirdly nonfunctional gadgets they had to work around, like the bad touchscreens at the shelter? Or did they see them as the enemy, something that they were at war with, the weapons of a distant adversary who wanted to subjugate them to its will?&rdquo;</div></blockquote><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Wyoming startled at the question. “Oh, shit! I didn’t even think of it. This must have sucked for you. How long has it been? Four months? Five? With no oven? You must be so sick of waiting for us, huh?” “Five months,” Salima said. “It certainly has been a long time.” “You poor thing. I would have just jailbroken mine. There’s been so much of that, honestly, it’ll be months before they sort it out. I don’t blame the users, either. I mean, ugh.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;They’ve been watching the darknet boards, they know that everyone’s been figuring out how to jailbreak their shit while we’ve been getting restarted, and they figure all those people could be customers, but instead of paying for food we sell them, they’d pay us to use food someone else sold them.” Salima almost laughed. It was a crime if she did it, a product if they sold it to her. Everything could be a product.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Salima had thought of Wye as her ally, every bit as offended by the locked-down world of Dorchester Towers as she was. But Wye had been working long hours for Boulangism and its new sister companies. She thought the problem was that Salima didn’t want to get into trouble. Salima had been thinking that, too. But that wasn’t the problem. Boulangism itself, that was the problem. The whole rotten business, that was the problem.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;“Because it’s their homes. Why should they have to pay to use the things in their homes?” “I agree with you, but the company would say it’s because they chose to live in a place where the rent was lower because the landlord thought he’d make money from their appliances. It was a deal, and that’s their end of it, and they can pay more somewhere else if they want that choice.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;She took a deep breath. “What I’m about to say isn’t how I see things, but it is how the company sees them. They say that you don’t have that choice, that they have that choice, and they’ll sell it to you. But if you take it without paying, that’s stealing. Again, that’s what they think.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>The following is a conversation between an employee of Boulangism and Salima. He starts off.</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;“You were living somewhere before this place, right?”</p>
<p>&ldquo;“A refugee shelter.”</p>
<p>&ldquo;“You could have chosen to stay there, right?” [Salima] wanted these people gone.</p>
<p>&ldquo;“I don’t think that is much of a choice.”</p>
<p>&ldquo;He shook his head. “The point is that you had a choice, and that’s because appliances like ours made it economical for landlords to build subsidy units.”</p>
<p>&ldquo;She didn’t say anything. She was getting angry and she didn’t like to be angry, didn’t want to show these people that she was angry.</p>
<p>&ldquo;“We want to help you people, let you get more out of your lives, give you more choices.”</p>
<p>&ldquo;What about the choice to jailbreak my things? She didn’t ask it.</p>
<p>&ldquo;“Honestly, I can’t understand your decision here.”</p>
<p>&ldquo;Choice is good, so long as I don’t choose not to help you? She didn’t say it.</p>
<p>&ldquo;“Can’t you see we want to help you?”</p>
<p>&ldquo;I can see that you want me to help you get more money from “people like me.” She still didn’t say it.&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote>      </div>
      </div>
        <div class="footer">
    <div class="footer-data"><div class="footer-links"><ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/contact.php" title="">Contact</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/support.php" title="">Support</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/privacy.php" title="">Privacy</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/rights.php" title="">Rights</a></li></ul></div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="copyright">Copyright (c) 1999-2026 earthli.com. All Rights Reserved.</div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="versions">Powered by <ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore/app_news.php">earthli News 3.7</a></li><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore" title="">earthli WebCore&trade; 3.7</a></li></ul></div></div>    </div>
      </div>
  </div>  </body>
</html>
]]>
  </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
      <title type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[Queen of Chaos by Diana Johnstone (2015) (read in 2020)]]>
  </title>
    <id>https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3889</id>
    <link href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3889"/>
    <updated>2020-02-02T21:30:42+01:00</updated>
    <author>
        <name type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[Marco von Ballmoos]]>
  </name>
      <uri>https://earthli.com/users/marco</uri>
    </author>
      <summary type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<blockquote class="quote abstract "><div>Disclaimer: these are notes I took while reading this book. They include citations I found interesting or enlightening or particularly well-written. In some cases, I&rsquo;ve pointed out which of these applies to which citation; in others, I have not. Any benefit you gain from reading these notes is... [<a class="complete-text-link" href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3889">More</a>]</div></blockquote>]]>
  </summary>
      <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<html lang="en">
  <head>
    <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/themes/ice.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/fonts/raleway.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/core/medium.css">
  </head>
  <body>
<div class="style-controls">  <div class="page">
    <div class="page-body">
<div class="info-box-top">
<p>
Published by <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_user.php?name=marco" title="Marco von Ballmoos" class="visible">marco</a> on <span class="date-time">2. Feb 2020 21:30:42 (GMT-5)</span>
</p>
</div>
      <div class="text-flow wide">
  <blockquote class="quote abstract "><div>Disclaimer: these are notes I took while reading this book. They include citations I found interesting or enlightening or particularly well-written. In some cases, I&rsquo;ve pointed out which of these applies to which citation; in others, I have not. Any benefit you gain from reading these notes is purely incidental to the purpose they serve of reminding me what I once read. Please see Wikipedia for a summary if I&rsquo;ve failed to provide one sufficient for your purposes. If my notes serve to trigger an interest in this book, then I&rsquo;m happy for you.</div></blockquote><p>This book is an unflinching history of the wars waged by the ostensibly post-Cold War United States (the last 30 years), with a focus on the so-called humanitarian bombings of the (now-) former Yugoslavia and Libya, the invasion of Iraq, the bombings of Syria, the sanctions and continued antipathy toward Russia as well as the machinations of NATO in Ukraine and the rest of Eastern Europe against both Russia and Iran. Woven into the narrative is the continued hypocrisy of purported purpose versus actual behavior, using examples from Honduras and Kosovo versus Crimea and Ukraine. </p>
<p>The book only occasionally loops back to implicate Clinton herself, although she was right there at the forefront for much, if not all, of this foreign policy. Instead, Johnstone tells a broader story of a national narrative, of which the Queen of Chaos Clinton is only an excellent and fitting representative. Johnstone spares no acrimony for Samantha Power, Susan Rice, Victoria Nuland and their poisonous worldview.</p>
<p>She provides a tremendous amount of historical detail in a well-sourced, well-written, and eminently readable) book. It is damning of the U.S. and its purported moral high ground, summing it up early on as follows:</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The United States is an irresponsible empire. It devastates countries and leaves them in shambles, with no compensation. Its actions are increasingly destructive because the purpose is not in reality to build an empire, but to destroy real or potential rivals and so maintain the position of superiority gained in World War II.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>Again and again, she shows how things that &ldquo;we all know&rdquo; from American history are deliberate fabrications, propaganda intended to tell history from the point of view of those in power in the States. The U.S. won WWII on its own. They were never allied with the Soviets. The French ran with their tails tucked. The Berlin Wall signaled the end of the Soviet Empire—they were defeated rather than giving up.</p>
<p>What would follow is an uninterrupted flow of lies, marketing campaigns for poisonous policies that benefited only a small cabal while killing millions and consigning millions more—even in the U.S.—to lives of despair. War would be made something palatable by making it seem like the most propitious and least-damaging of solutions to what seemed one intractable problem after another.</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;Inherent in all this is an apology for “preventive” war. That is, unprovoked aggressive war, waged to “prevent” the rise of a rival, or to get rid of a dictator, or to head off some supposed threat, such as (nonexistent) weapons of mass destruction.</p>
<p>&ldquo;[…]</p>
<p>&ldquo;This is the most blatant trick in the “preventive war” doctrine: <strong>we may go to war to prevent something that never would have happened anyway, but since it didn’t happen, we can claim credit for preventing it.</strong> (Emphasis added.)&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote><p>And war is only one policy that serves the primary goal: to ensure that this same tiny cabal—the 0.1%—continue to exert their control over the rest of the world. Globalization is also just a tool to enable these people to grow their empire and to never have to fear that they will lose their wealth, power, and luxury.</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;[…] globalization means Americanization of the entire world. Our interests and values must prevail everywhere. In short, globalization means a world tied together by the universal penetration of financial markets in every sector of each national economy,&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>In the propaganda war, the ideas of the left—progressives—must be subsumed, drained into a fallow field, where they won&rsquo;t cause any further trouble. To this end, the left has only too eagerly grasped the proffered <span class="quote-inline">&ldquo;consolation prize [of] ideological hegemony in the more sentimental area of human relations&rdquo;</span>. That is, they&rsquo;ve been distracted by the bauble of purported sociological control, completely unaware that it doesn&rsquo;t matter at all because they&rsquo;ve long since capitulated any differing opinions on economics or determining the purpose and goals of society.</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Completely defeated in the area of economic policy, the left gets to define the dominant social doctrine, based on multiculturalism, concern for minorities, and anti-racism. <strong>Americans are taught to judge the governments of other countries almost exclusively by how they treat pro-Western dissidents or select minorities.</strong> (Emphasis added.)&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>But even here, the hypocrisy is astounding, absolutely flabbergasting. Russia&rsquo;s &ldquo;problems with gays&rdquo; (a law forbidding &ldquo;proselytizing&rdquo; to minors about homosexuality) are considered nearly a reason to bomb it flat without a second thought while there is no issue at all with Saudi Arabia&rsquo;s death penalty for homosexuality.</p>
<p>The media and most of the political apparatus in America is in agreement. They are either incredibly stupid, incredibly ignorant, incredibly brainwashed, incredibly hypocritical, incredibly Machiavellian or some disgusting combination of all of these. Thanks to the Internet, it <em>is</em> possible to find dissidents. Thanks to media monopolies, it&rsquo;s not even worth the energy to try to suppress them.</p>
<p>The U.S. is only too happy to throw stones in all directions, framing countries as good or bad based on their own rules. Johnstone deftly slays this paper tiger.</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Gay rights – or rather “LGBT” rights – is now the one human rights area where the United States can claim to be “in advance” of most of the world. The issue can be used to attempt to discredit and embarrass other countries at a time when the United States is lagging behind in areas such as child mortality, income equality, life expectancy, primary education, and industrial productivity. As mentioned above, <strong>there is one area in which it does lead the world: the size of its prison population. Surely this is a more meaningful measurement of the state of “human rights” in the United States than the legality of gay marriage.</strong> (Emphasis added.)&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>And don&rsquo;t forget that this supposed interest in gay rights—or any minority rights—is complete bullshit in the service of the higher goal of world ideological domination through capital. It&rsquo;s all in the service of the goal stated at the very beginning: <span class="quote-inline">&ldquo;destroy real or potential rivals&rdquo;</span>.</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;While the United States officially hails “multi-ethnicity”, ethnic minorities in China and Russia are clearly seen as weaknesses to be exploited in order to destabilize and even break apart these great nations into more manageable pieces, on the model of Yugoslavia.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>There is no concept too sacred to twist into a weapon in the service of this goal. Johnstone takes time to see the many ways in which accusations of &ldquo;genocide&rdquo;—instead of being using carefully and absolutely only where appropriate–are scattered about wherever the U.S. needs advantage. And the rest of the world kowtows to this linguistic bullying, for its own selfish reasons.</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Once a leader is accused of “genocide”, there can be no negotiations, no diplomacy, no attempt to find a peaceful solution to the conflict which is the background of the alleged crime. <strong>The guilty party can only be indicted or killed.</strong> (Emphasis added.)&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>The pattern repeats itself endlessly and tiresomely. To these ends, the U.S. uses its massive media empire to tell stories about the rest of the world—narrative over which it has sole control, that it alone shapes. For example, during the Arab Spring, where the entire narrative was driven by interviewees who, judging by their accents, had obviously spent their politically formative years at American universities.</p>
<p>We don&rsquo;t seem to have any problem believing &ldquo;facts&rdquo; delivered by people about countries whose language and culture they know nothing about and to which they&rsquo;ve never traveled. It was the same in Serbia, where <span class="quote-inline">&ldquo;[r]eporters searched Albanian refugee camps for “somebody who has been raped and speaks English”.&rdquo;</span></p>
<p>How much sense does it make to come to conclusions about foreign policy reported in this way? You can take the information in, but should reserve judgment rather than leaping to conclusions. What are the odds that the Washington Post or the New York Times has the story right about a policy in China when they get everything wrong about stories in their own country?</p>
<p>Throughout the book, Johnstone takes issue with U.S. control of the narrative, the &ldquo;framing&rdquo; of issues, of large-scale ideas like international conflict. Even in this case, people are taught to think of actual wars like flame wars on the Internet: as differences in ideology. This is a luxury that only those in the relatively opulent West have. No-one really goes to war unless they are in desperate straits. No-one but empires.</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;[…] the totally unproven assumption that wars are caused by differences in political systems rather than by competition for resources, territorial disputes, or any number of other conflicts that may arise. It rules out coexistence between systems; <strong>the underlying implication is that our particular cause for going to war is to make every country resemble ours.</strong> (Emphasis added.)&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>Even granting that they may have started with the right aims, purportedly independent organizations like Amnesty International (and, even worse, Human Rights Watch) are subsumed by this worldview, trumpeting the U.S.&lsquo;s truth and granting their implicit imprimatur. Each &ldquo;win&rdquo; advances the U.S. agenda more, moving it to its position as the &ldquo;leader of the free world&rdquo; in not only its own mind, but everyone else&rsquo;s.</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;[…] the main object of the “Kosovo war” was to put the United States and NATO above the law, where they remain to this day.</p>
<p>&ldquo;[…]</p>
<p>&ldquo;The Czech Republic, Hungary and Poland were taken into NATO on the eve of the bombing of Yugoslavia in 1999.”&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote><p>This isn&rsquo;t to say that everything the U.S. does moves it forward inexorably on a track to world domination. It is a stupid, half-blind and <em>mean</em> beast. It blunders about, knowing little and learning nothing, shouting accusations and conspiracy theories, often unaware that it is getting in its own way. Those who always benefit continue to do so, but they also often create more problems for themselves as well as everyone else. They just don&rsquo;t suffer for it—except for maybe losing a bit on an investment once in a while.</p>
<p>It&rsquo;s not even an efficient death machine. There is no more eloquent example of this than the mean-spirited and blinkered thinking that led to Gaddafi&rsquo;s ouster. Destroying Libya for revenge against a man who&rsquo;d never really harmed them has loosed more problems on the U.S. strategy than they&rsquo;d anticipated—not unusual, since policymakers there understand so little of the real world and believe their own bullshit. This is bound to hamper their plans.</p>
<p>In the case of Libya and Gaddafi, it was about eliminating a successful, quasi-socialist regime that shared its country&rsquo;s wealth with <em>all</em> of its citizens. Chavez and now Maduro can tell the same story about Venezuela. So has it always been and so will it remain until the sun sets on the American empire: so terrified of the communists that they let the anti-communists destroy everything instead.</p>
<p>Reading this book now—in a presidential election year where Hillary is opening her big yap again and Bernie is about to be torpedoed by the Dems again—is instructive. Johnstone eloquently lays out the limits of policy and ideology in the U.S.</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;When it comes to domestic legislation, no truly progressive or egalitarian policies are feasible. However much they quarrel, both parties have accepted that domestic politics must conform to the interests of financial capital, “the markets”.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>This kind of single-mindedness isn&rsquo;t limited to Hillary. Though she was there at each critical juncture and is the Queen in the title, she is far from alone. Instead, the U.S. is full of people in power who are guilty of, </p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;[…] thoughtlessly endorsing the possibility of nuclear war with no more reflection tha[n] a sports star endorsing a soft drink. This frivolity indicates that the problem of Hillary Rodham Clinton goes far beyond a single individual and reveals a far deeper crisis in the American political system.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><h2>Citations</h2><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The United States is an irresponsible empire. It devastates countries and leaves them in shambles, with no compensation. Its actions are increasingly destructive because the purpose is not in reality to build an empire, but to destroy real or potential rivals and so maintain the position of superiority gained in World War II.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 9</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;While Zelaya was demanding to be reinstated, Hillary sought mediation between the “two sides”: the democratically elected President-in-exile in Costa Rica and the “temporary interim president” Roberto Micheletti, installed by the coup. In a sense, there were indeed “two sides”. It was a quarrel between those who had violated the constitution and the man whom they accused of wanting to violate the constitution.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 19</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Every four years, the U.S. two party system essentially gives voters a choice between only two candidates, both heavily vetted by billionaires and lobbies representing major corporations and financial interests. There is the Bad Cop, the Republican Party, and the Good Cop, the Democratic Party. They play their roles, but however they appeal to the voters, the first task of anyone who aspires to be one of those two exclusive candidates is to appear as the best investment for contributors who expect to get what they paid for. <strong>When it comes to domestic legislation, no truly progressive or egalitarian policies are feasible. However much they quarrel, both parties have accepted that domestic politics must conform to the interests of financial capital, “the markets”.</strong> (Emphasis added.)&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 28</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Western media have managed to distort that decisive Russian move for peace by reducing the end of the Cold War to a single symbol: the fall of the Berlin Wall. It was more a spectacle than an historic event. The real event happened earlier: Gorbachev’s visit to the West German capital, Bonn, in June 1989, which sealed Moscow’s abandonment of the German Democratic Republic.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 32</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;To fixate on “the Fall of the Berlin Wall” creates the impression that Eastern European changes were caused principally by a popular uprising of the people against communism. This interpretation obscures the historic decisions made by the Soviet nomenklatura.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 32</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;It is doubtful that this was intentional or even conscious. A president with no strong foreign policy vision who reacts to unexpected events in unfamiliar places is inevitably manipulated by advisers with an agenda. In the American oligarchy, the President is a temporary chairman of the board who is there to take responsibility for actions decided in private sessions. He is there to sell policy more than to make it.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 33</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The Jackson-Vanik amendment merged main neoconservative themes which persist to this day: the assertion of U.S. power to dictate internal policies of other countries, hostility to Russia, devotion to Israel, and the use of “human rights” demands as grounds for economic sanctions or other forms of intervention.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 35</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Inherent in all this is an apology for “preventive” war. That is, unprovoked aggressive war, waged to “prevent” the rise of a rival, or to get rid of a dictator, or to head off some supposed threat, such as (nonexistent) weapons of mass destruction.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 36</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The wars against Serbia, Iraq and Libya illustrate this principle, as all three wars were initiated to meet threats that were in reality imaginary. This is the most blatant trick in the “preventive war” doctrine: we may go to war to prevent something that never would have happened anyway, but since it didn’t happen, we can claim credit for preventing it&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 36</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The military-industrial complex has no direction of its own, no philosophy, and no values. It is simply there, a monster which, as a planetary public safety measure, desperately needs to be tamed and destroyed. But instead of figuring out how to get rid of it, policy intellectuals contrive things for it to do.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 43</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;But the present context is globalization, and for Americans believing in the exceptional nature of the United States, globalization means Americanization of the entire world. Our interests and values must prevail everywhere. In short, globalization means a world tied together by the universal penetration of financial markets in every sector of each national economy, thus allowing international capital to shape production, trade, and services via their own investment choices.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 47</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The United States has between 662 and over a thousand military bases or installations (depending on what one defines as such) spread across some 148 foreign countries, effectively controlling the armed forces of many of these nations through “aid” and “joint training programs”. The United States not only succeeds in using its influence to obtain trade deals to the advantage of its own corporations and financial institutions, it also feels free to violate the spirit and letter of free trade whenever it chooses to “punish” some country or other with economic sanctions.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 48</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;In 1944, arrival of U.S. Armed Forces on the continent was indeed greeted as liberation. But after seventy years of protracted military occupation and political domination, this liberation might more appropriately be celebrated as a conquest.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 50</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Personal information can be used to frame, entrap, or eliminate anyone who might oppose a system where the concentration of power has grown to a point where ordinary people are forced to fight back. The surveillance machine becomes an important weapon in any state’s arsenal of repression. Some future leader, protecting the power of the ruling .01%, might say, echoing Madeleine Albright, “What’s the use of having that splendid repressive machinery if we don’t use it?” Like any powerful weapon, its masters can use its very existence as an argument for its use.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 55</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;This session took place in the State Department, with thousands of participants via interactive videoconferences at 50 U.S. embassies around the world. Hillary trotted out her favorite image of a three-legged stool that upholds stable societies: “a responsive, accountable government; an energetic, effective private sector economy; and then civil society, which represents everything else that happens in the space between the government and the economy, that holds the values, that represents the aspirations.” This “stool” is actually the image of the bland governance of a corporate society: a government responsive to the demands of finance capital, a capitalist economy, and private, unelected and well-funded organizations that will determine “our values”. Note what is missing: a vigorous political life, scrupulously independent media, and an education system that prepares intellectually alert and critical citizens. Hillary said she was “very pleased to announce that we are more than doubling our financial support for efforts to respond to threats to civil society, to help human rights workers&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 56</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Active “civil society” is a matter of minorities, very often relatively privileged minorities. However sincere, these educated, Western-oriented minorities active in human rights organizations can easily be seen as the beginning of a dominant managerial class in the globalized world that the United States aspires to create and administer.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 59</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;For the left, the consolation prize is ideological hegemony in the more sentimental area of human relations, especially that of “human rights”. Completely defeated in the area of economic policy, the left gets to define the dominant social doctrine, based on multiculturalism, concern for minorities, and anti-racism. Americans are taught to judge the governments of other countries almost exclusively by how they treat pro-Western dissidents or select minorities.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 61</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Guilt over treatment of the Jews during World War II is the emotional core of a West European tendency to hold every national majority under permanent suspicion of oppressing minorities or of wanting to oppress them. Every ruler with a restive minority is suspected of contemplating genocide.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 63</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;For some small ultra-left anarchist groups, the long-term prospect is a world without frontiers, in which everyone is free to move everywhere. National borders and nation states will disappear. These groups consider themselves radically anti-capitalist, but their ideal is identical to that of the capitalist globalists, who see more clearly: without nation states, private corporations and financial interests may rule the world unimpeded.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 64</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Gay marriage is not necessarily exportable, least of all to places where marriage is still considered an institution designed to ensure the security and identity of children born to a particular couple. Gay marriage echoes an historically very recent view of marriage as the happy outcome of a love affair.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 67</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The international campaign for LGBT rights has been poisoned by the inherent double standards of the U.S. position. Criticism of Saudi Arabia when it executes a homosexual remains toothless, with no threat of boycott or sanctions, in contrast to the uproar over nonexistent problems for gays in Sochi.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 70</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;It is almost comic to recall that at the start of the Cold War, J. Edgar Hoover and Senator Joe McCarthy coupled homosexuality with communism as the main threats to America. Whereas the United States has become more sexually libertarian, Russia has become more conservative, more Christian, more puritanical. For decades, the West railed against Russia for its “godless communism”.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 71</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Gay rights – or rather “LGBT” rights – is now the one human rights area where the United States can claim to be “in advance” of most of the world. The issue can be used to attempt to discredit and embarrass other countries at a time when the United States is lagging behind in areas such as child mortality, income equality, life expectancy, primary education, and industrial productivity. As mentioned above, there is one area in which it does lead the world: the size of its prison population. Surely this is a more meaningful measurement of the state of “human rights” in the United States than the legality of gay marriage.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 71</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;It seems to be forgotten in Washington that ostentatious prayer has always been considered in ages wiser than our own as a practice that should be rigorously banned from politics, for the simple reason that nothing is easier to fake than piety.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 73</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;French intelligence believes Chalabi was an Iranian agent,&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 81</div></div><p>OMG genius.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The plain fact is that Washington politicians are not very skilled at grasping the true intentions of sophisticated exiles from exotic regions. This should be one reason for caution in foreign adventures, yet it is a lesson that is clearly ignored.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 81</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Many in the West considered Bosnia to be “our Spain”, the combat of a generation. But in this case, instead of volunteering to fight for it themselves they were ready to send NATO.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 86</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Under the influence of memories of the Holocaust, the Serbs were accused from the start of genocide, an accusation that finally stuck after the massacre at Srebrenica. But the war might never have started, had Izetbegovic not been encouraged by Washington to reject compromise.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 87</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Since the civil war in Bosnia and the Kosovo war, most of the left has been inclined to support almost any minority in revolt against its government, regardless of the issues, and whether or not the demands were reasonable or just. Form had won over content.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 88</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;While the United States officially hails “multi-ethnicity”, ethnic minorities in China and Russia are clearly seen as weaknesses to be exploited in order to destabilize and even break apart these great nations into more manageable pieces, on the model of Yugoslavia.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 89</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The U.S. anti-genocide campaign, by rating genocide as worse than war, and as something that war can prevent, actually ends up justifying war.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 91</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;However, when Washington’s irregular Ukrainian allies can be seen on YouTube advocating wiping out the “excess” inhabitants of Eastern Ukraine in order to take their resources, while the official Ukrainian army shells civilian areas, the alarm bells remain silent in the genocide prevention establishment in Washington.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 92</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The Tutsis were a minority in Rwanda and could not expect to win the elections promised under the auspices of foreign powers in the attempt to negotiate a peaceful end to the civil war. The RPF needed a military victory to gain power and it used the April 6 attack on the presidential plane to break the truce and press for military victory. At the same time, desperate and enraged Hutus went berserk and plunged into a ghastly slaughter of those they took to be supporters of the advancing RPF. And yet, after his military victory, Paul Kagame was unbeatable. In August 2010 he won a second seven-year term as president with 93% of the vote, and a 95% turnout.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 96</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;One can see similar behavior even in animals: it is fear, much more than hatred, which motivates such murderous reactions. If this is so, then campaigns against “hatred” are irrelevant. What is necessary is to avoid situations where fear reaches such a fevered pitch that blind, indiscriminate killing is the result.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 98</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;This unipolar world, which Samantha Power defends passionately as the proper result of America’s unique virtue, is a major cause of deepening chaos. It doesn’t work and it can’t work.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 99</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;It is also a political term. Once a leader is accused of “genocide”, there can be no negotiations, no diplomacy, no attempt to find a peaceful solution to the conflict which is the background of the alleged crime. The guilty party can only be indicted or killed.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 100</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;An early neoconservative, Kirkpatrick was credited in Washington with the doctrine that it was perfectly all right for the United States to support regimes that were “authoritarian”, usually referring to U.S.-sponsored Latin American military dictatorships, while Washington must oppose “totalitarian” regimes, meaning communist states.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 102</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The closed meeting in a French chateau ended with the so-called “Rambouillet Accords”, which were not accords at all, since Belgrade refused to sign onto a deal that included an addendum which would have permitted U.S. forces to occupy all of Yugoslavia with total impunity at the expense of the host country. Even Henry Kissinger described the false agreement as “a terrible diplomatic document”, “a provocation, an excuse to start bombing”. Off the record, Madeleine Albright told reporters that: “we intentionally set the bar too high for the Serbs to comply. They need some bombing, and that’s what they are going to get.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 110</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;This was pure war propaganda. There was no “extermination” and no threat of extermination, but a conflict between a government and an armed secessionist group supported by neighboring Albania. The refugee exodus was dramatized by Western media as the tragic cause of the war, when it was actually the result. Albanian refugees fleeing the violence obliged Western media with invented tales of rape and murder. Reporters searched Albanian refugee camps for “somebody who has been raped and speaks English”.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 111</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Nobody was interested in the people getting killed by NATO bombs. Nobody cared about the little Serbian town of Varvarin, of no military significance whatsoever, yet targeted by NATO. Air strikes against people gathered on Holy Trinity Day killed at random the town priest and the mayor’s daughter, 15-year-old student Sanja Milenkovic, the pride of the town for having won a mathematics prize. Schools, hospitals, and bridges were struck in an effort to turn the population against their president.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 111</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;When the cheering dies down, we can observe that this is a recipe for massive intervention in the affairs of other countries, including breaking up states we don’t like, such as Sudan or Yugoslavia (“self-determination”), insisting on maintaining those we do like, such as Ukraine or Georgia (“the rule of law”), sanctioning and bombing offenders (“spreading American values”), and above all, regime change (“elimination of dictators”).&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 119</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The notion that “a global system of stable liberal democracies would be less prone to war” is based on the totally unproven assumption that wars are caused by differences in political systems rather than by competition for resources, territorial disputes, or any number of other conflicts that may arise. It rules out coexistence between systems; <strong>the underlying implication is that our particular cause for going to war is to make every country resemble ours.</strong> (Emphasis added.)&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 119</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;[Amnesty International&rsquo;s] aim was not to use the prisoners as an excuse to rant against an “enemy” government, but to persuade governments to cease persecuting non-violent dissidents. It strove successfully to exercise a universal civilizing influence.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 121</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;While it has protested against such flagrant abuses as Guantanamo and the cruel jailing of Bradley Chelsea Manning, such punctual criticism is heavily outweighed by blanket denunciations of governments targeted for regime change by the United States. In the case of U.S.-backed “color revolutions”, human rights organizations such as AI and Human Rights Watch are enlisted not to defend specific political prisoners, but rather to brand whole governments as “human rights offenders”.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 122</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Aimed primarily at public opinion, effectiveness depends on a sympathetic media eager to give publicity to provocative actions, actions which would be considered disorderly conduct anywhere else in the world, but are celebrated in this case as the heroic defiance of tyranny.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 122</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Amnesty International awarded “prisoner of conscience” status to the three Pussy Rioters and devoted extraordinary attention to the Pussy Riot case, treating it as a major human rights campaign. No comparable attention was devoted to the harsh treatment of Bradley/Chelsea Manning, the threat of U.S. prosecution against Julian Assange, the repeated murder by U.S. police of black suspects, the world-record prison population in the United States, or Guantanamo Bay.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 124</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;This was a tone that could only make it more, not less, politically difficult for President Putin to grant Pussy Riot a presidential amnesty. Nevertheless he did so, prior to the Sochi games.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 126</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;That is: the pressure brought to bear would only be effective against a non-dictator who cares about public opinion.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 126</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;[…] once the West labels a disobedient leader of a foreign state a “dictator”, his state no longer has a judicial system of its own, free elections, independent media, freedom of expression, contented citizens – no, none of that, because in the collective groupthink of the West, every “dictator” is Hitler/Stalin combined, and every ill or accident in his country is never anything but the direct result of his own wicked will.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 130</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;But never did she utter a murmur of understanding for Orthodox Christians offended by the obscene antics of Pussy Riot in their place of worship. This can only be seen as yet another example of the official United States readiness to ally with the worst elements in any society they aim to undermine.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 132</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Millions of women in the world are struggling for the most basic rights. What can they think of Western human rights organizations that spend millions to promote a few privileged women performing mere temper tantrums in public? Not only women, but all those who have serious reasons to rebel against genuine injustice suffer from the spotlight focused on these carefully choreographed and secretly financed “protests”.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 135</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Western powers nurse their claim to be the sponsors of world freedom by extolling Pussy Riot and Femen, while genuine social protest is increasingly spied on, repressed, marginalized and ignored.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 135</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;In Europe, people imagined a gentle social-democratic world, combining the social of socialism with the democracy of the West. Two decades later, both principles are wounded, perhaps mortally. Social measures turned out to be revocable once the capitalist world was no longer in competition with communism for workers’ loyalty.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 137</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The conflict in Kosovo was so obscure, so unfamiliar to Americans and so distorted by deception and self-deception 24, that the easiest way to think of it was by analogy with a conflict everyone knew about, or thought they knew about. The moral reward seemed immense, especially in consideration of the low cost, since it entailed bombing a country with inadequate air defenses, with no great risk to our side.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 144</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The word Kosovo comes from the Serbian expression “kosovo polje” meaning field of blackbirds, with “Kosovo” meaning “of blackbirds”. It is an historic Serbian heartland where the Albanian-speaking population had grown sharply in recent decades, due to immigration from neighboring Albania and having the highest birthrate in Europe. The “Kosovars” were Albanian nationalists who waved the Albanian flag, strongly supported by their cousins just across the border in Albania.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 146</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;The general public in the West readily believed that the Kosovo war was a humanitarian rescue operation and a successful one as well, since it cost no lives on our side. Thus the first geopolitical purpose of this little war was achieved: it served as an advertisement for war itself. The operation proved that a strong propaganda campaign with an emphasis on alleged “victims of potential genocide” could successfully flout the United Nations peacekeeping system established at the end of World War II.</p>
<p>&ldquo;NATO simply proceeded without Security Council authorization, in blatant violation of international law, and the influence of its leading members led to the creation of a special International Tribunal, with the United Nations stamp of approval, whose main task was to prosecute Serbians for war crimes. Thus, the main object of the “Kosovo war” was to put the United States and NATO above the law, where they remain to this day.&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 146</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;[…] investigators found evidence of somewhere between two to four thousand deaths in Kosovo during the war, counting all sides and all manner of fatalities. There may have been more, but in any case, it was not enough to enable the NATO-backed International Criminal Tribunal for Former Yugoslavia (ICTY) to indict Yugoslav president Slobodan Milosevic for “genocide”, as planned.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 148</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Immediately after moving their occupation forces into Kosovo, the United States set about building a thousand-acre U.S. military base, Camp Bondsteel, on stolen farmland. There was nothing in any international agreement authorizing this huge U.S. base, which is still there.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 150</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;“The only thing that’s clear is that Kosovo is firmly in the grip of organized crime”, he said. “Kosovo is a country in which centuries-old traditions live on, and blood feuds are part of the culture. We Central Europeans have not been able to convince the Kosovars of the benefits of adopting a new legal and value system like the one we have in the West.” Wasn’t that perhaps precisely the main problem that the Serbs had with Kosovo?&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 156</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Kosovo is neither fully independent nor a real state. It remains under foreign occupation, has no functioning judiciary branch of its own, and its economy is dependent on crime.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 157</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The concept of “joint criminal enterprise”, used in U.S. criminal law against mafia gangs, was imported into the ad hoc International Criminal Tribunal for former Yugoslavia to apply to the Serbs, with the implication that the mere defense of Serbian interests was criminal.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 160</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Whenever the United States takes sides in an ethnic or political conflict somewhere, the usual procedure is to accuse the other side of planning to commit “genocide”. This rules out consideration that both sides may be fighting for specific territorial or political gains which, if properly understood, might be mediated.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 160</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;In Ethiopia in February 2009, Gaddafi was elected chairman of the 53-nation African Union, pledging that he would “continue to insist that our sovereign countries work to achieve the United States of Africa.” He envisioned “a single African military force, a single currency and a single passport for Africans to move freely around the continent”.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 165</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Evidence emerged after the trial that the Swiss timing device discovered by U.S. agents at the crash scene was a demonstration model which could not have been sold to Libya, as alleged by the prosecution, and must have been planted by the agents who “found” it.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 166</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Without investigation, mainstream media spread the sensational accusations that Gaddafi was using African mercenaries and jet plane attacks on civilians to “kill his own people”. No visual or documentary proof of the air attacks ever emerged, and reliable witnesses on the spot denied they ever existed. The accusation of employing “African mercenaries” was even more sinister. It was not only false; it was the tip of the racist iceberg that underlay the whole anti-Gaddafi operation.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 173</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Three days later, when asked about the bombing of Libya on “Meet the Press”, she replied: “…let’s be fair here. They didn’t attack us, but what they were doing and Gaddafi’s history and the potential for the disruption and instability was very much in our interests … and seen by our European friends and our Arab partners as very vital to their interests.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 174</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;[…] when asked about the bombing of Libya on “Meet the Press”, she replied: “…let’s be fair here. They didn’t attack us, but what they were doing and Gaddafi’s history and the potential for the disruption and instability was very much in our interests … and seen by our European friends and our Arab partners as very vital to their interests.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 174</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The Western human rights community is a network of organizations that thrive on leveling accusations against the countries that Western donors want to embarrass.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 175</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Gaddafi does not go, he will just make trouble. That is just his nature. There are some creatures that are like that.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 177 by <cite>Hillary Clinton</cite></div></div><p>The irony is thick.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Then he warned: “Any one of you might be next. Yes. America fought alongside Saddam Hussein against Khomeini. He was their friend. Cheney was a friend of Saddam Hussein. Rumsfeld, the US defense secretary at the time Iraq was destroyed, was a close friend of Saddam Hussein. Ultimately, they sold him out and hanged him. You are friends of America – let’s say that ‘we’ are, not ‘you’. But one of these days, America may hang any of us.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 180</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Calls for peaceful mediation from leaders such as Venezuela’s democratically- elected President Hugo Chavez were denounced as “support for dictators”, as if only a country bearing the Washington label of “pure democracy” had the right to ask not to be bombed.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 182</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Gaddafi’s Jamahiriya was a peculiar experiment precisely because it was a type of modernization that was meant to fit the peculiarities of a sparsely-inhabited desert country imbued with Muslim traditions. It included a form of direct democracy, and a General People’s Congress, which could (and did) reject proposals coming directly from Gaddafi. Moammar Gaddafi was indeed a “Guide” and not a dictator; his guidance was often rejected by the government, perhaps increasingly so.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 184</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;A U.S.-backed “revolution” can only be destructive, a way to get rid of what is in place. We smash it all, and count on “our guys” to rise to the top of the wreck, with a little help from mercenaries and Special Forces. And if this fails, U.S. leaders shrug and insist they meant well. If the natives can’t put together what we broke, then that’s their problem.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 185</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;On October 18, 2011, Hillary Rodham Clinton arrived in Tripoli for her first official visit to a country which she did not understand and which she was rapidly transforming into something no one would recognize. While waiting for Secretary of State Clinton to arrive, a “senior State Department official” (unidentified, as is the custom) told reporters that the Americans would be talking to the Libyans on how to “integrate Libya fully into the 21st-century world economy in transparent ways where Libya’s oil wealth is used for the benefit of all of Libya’s citizens”. A rich joke, considering that Gaddafi’s insistence on spreading Libya’s oil wealth among the citizenry, by providing free education, housing and health care, was surely a central reason that leaders of the United States, Qatar and the Arab League sought regime change. The United States, it was announced, was planning to help the Libyans learn English, as if the language were unknown to them.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 186</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Hillary Clinton, as usual, had not come to Libya to learn about the country, but to tell people what to do. “Women in Libya should have equal rights”, she said, true to her usual feminist persona. This was another rich joke, since thanks to the NATO bombing, women in Libya were about to lose the rights they had gained thanks to Gaddafi, not only the right to appear in public unveiled, or to hold significant jobs, but simply to walk down the street in safety, or simply to stay alive….&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 187</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;We hope he can be captured or killed soon so that you don’t have to fear him any longer,” Hillary told a selected gathering in Tripoli. Two days later, Gaddafi was both captured and killed. Video footage shows that the Libyan leader and his son were captured alive, atrociously abused and then murdered.</p>
<p>&ldquo;When informed of Gaddafi’s death, Hillary had her moment of lasting fame, the moment that will define her in history. Told by her aide Huma Abedin that Gaddafi had been killed, Hillary uttered a girlish, “Wow”, before paraphrasing the original imperialist, Julius Caesar: “We came, we saw, he died!”, then she broke out into peels of happy laughter.&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 187</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;In an August 2008 cable to Washington, Christopher Stevens reported that: “Moammar al-Qadhafi recently brokered a widely publicized agreement with Tuareg tribal leaders from Libya, Chad, Niger, Mali and Algeria in which they would abandon separatist aspirations and smuggling (of weapons and trans-national extremists) in exchange for development assistance and financial support.” 31 In short, Gaddafi was using Libya’s oil wealth to keep peace in the region. With his death, that peace ended, and war spread to neighboring Mali, while law and order broke down completely in Libya itself. A peaceful and prosperous country descended into chaos.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 191</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;His final catastrophe was due less to his faults than to his virtues: above all, his “dogged altruism”, which cut him off from the critical chorus of his own most prominent people. In his own way, he was as blind as Oedipus. His ghost still needs a future Sophocles, a future Shakespeare. But is that any longer still possible? The America that aspires to command the world today is killing not only nations; it is killing all nobility of spirit. It is killing tragedy, that ability to grasp the truth of the human condition in its defeat, that ability to bury the dead with honor and to respect the defiance of the brave fool who imagined he could save the world.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 193</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Americans seem unable to understand why a nation that in modern times has twice been the object of massive, devastating invasions from the West should mind seeing the United States extend the greatest military machine in history right up to its doorstep. If Russian leaders express objections, the American response is to suggest that they must be paranoid.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 194</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The Czech Republic, Hungary and Poland were taken into NATO on the eve of the bombing of Yugoslavia in 1999.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 195</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Following the usual rule of double standards, the U.S. propaganda chorus denounced Putin’s KGB background as proof of perfidy, conveniently ignoring that President George Bush the First had been head of the CIA.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 196</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Above all, he concluded, Russia seeks to work together with responsible and independent partners “in constructing a fair and democratic world order that would ensure security and prosperity not only for a select few, but for all.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 200</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;At a meeting in January 2015 in Winnipeg, when asked whether she had “decided to be President”, she turned the question around and clumsily mimicked Putin “deciding to be President”, adding with a gloating self-righteousness that: “We have a process” – as if being the second Clinton to run for President, backed by billionaires, was a more virtuous process than Russian elections.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 202</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The Pentagon expected to learn more about Putin’s “thinking processes” from the “body signature” of his “posture/gesture mergers”, than from paying close attention to what he actually said. This seems to lend support to Putin’s suggestion that United States leaders treat the rest of the world as if they were experimenting with laboratory rats.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 206</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;While gratuitously accusing the extremely popular elected President of Russia of being a “dictator” and treating every eccentric oppositionist as the embodiment of genuine democracy, the United States is also treating Russia as a potential military target.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 207</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;To know about the almost daily provocative military exercises held by various combinations of NATO forces and their partners (such as Georgia and Sweden) around Russian borders, one must turn to an internet site such as Rick Rozoff’s “Stop NATO”. Mass media ignore these martial operations, clearly designed as exercises to prepare for war against Russia. When, eventually, Russia reacts to these constant threats, mainstream media will report this reaction as an unprovoked gesture of paranoid hostility.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 207</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Historically, the Russians, essentially prudent and defensive, are reluctant to start wars, even though they tend to be good at winning them. It is highly probable that U.S. leaders count on Russian prudence to allow them to get away with their provocations, and to back down rather than risk a nuclear war.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 208</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Mere lack of solid evidence, official denials from Damascus, or even evidence implicating the rebels were not enough to head off the bombing by the Western allies.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 215</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;At this point, like the branch a drowning man can clutch to escape from the torrent, the Russians seized on an offhand remark by Hillary’s successor, Secretary of State John Kerry. Asked what Bashar al Assad could do to prevent Western air strikes, Kerry replied rhetorically that the Syrian leader could turn over his entire stock of chemical weapons to the international community, adding that “he isn’t about to do it and it can’t be done”. Russian diplomats rapidly contacted the Syrians who retorted that it could indeed be done. And it was. After rapid and smooth negotiations in the midst of a war, the Syrian government actually handed over its entire arsenal of chemical weapons to international inspectors in record time.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 216</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Putin insisted that Russia was not protecting a particular Syrian government, but international law. “It is alarming that military intervention in internal conflicts in foreign countries has become commonplace for the United States. Is it in America’s long-term interest? I doubt it. Millions around the world increasingly see America not as a model of democracy but as relying solely on brute force, cobbling coalitions together under the slogan ‘you’re either with us or against us’.” Countries react by seeking to acquire weapons of mass destruction in self-defense. To strengthen non-proliferation, it would be necessary to “stop using the language of force and return to the path of civilized diplomatic and political settlement.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 217</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;It is extremely dangerous to encourage people to see themselves as exceptional, whatever the motivation”, the Russian President concluded. “There are big countries and small countries, rich and poor, those with long democratic traditions and those still finding their way to democracy.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 218 by <cite>Vladimir Putin</cite></div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Glazyev noted that Ukraine was running an enormous foreign accounts deficit, funded with foreign borrowing, and that the substantial increase in Western imports resulting from the DCFTA could only swell this deficit. Ukraine “will either default on its debts or require a sizable bailout”, he observed. The Forbes reporter concluded that “the Russian position is far closer to the truth than the happy talk coming from Brussels and Kiev.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 220</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;In short, the question of Crimea leaving Ukraine and returning to Russia had come up repeatedly ever since Ukraine gained its independence. That Crimea would go ahead with its long-contemplated plan to leave Ukraine and return to Russia once an anti-Russian putsch seized power in Kiev could not have been a surprise to anyone with even a rudimentary knowledge of the region.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 223</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;[…] it claims that its military build-up in those countries is to “defend” them from Russian “aggression”. All those within the Western power structure who repeat this tale are either bald-faced liars or too ignorant to qualify for their present positions.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 224</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Born in 1974, Yats obviously does not remember any such thing, but apparently belongs to a school of Ukrainian nationalists whose hatred of Russians leads them to overlook the massive invasion of the Soviet Union by the Wehrmacht in June of 1941, which devastated Ukraine, and to blame the war on those who fought back and finally won: the Red Army.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 228</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;On May 2, Right Sector militia violently attacked the federalists, who fled into the building which was then set on fire by their assailants. Some perished in the flames; others, who managed to jump out of windows, were beaten to death by nationalist militants. There were forty-eight confirmed dead, yet Kiev has tended to blame the victims. The Odessa massacre was played down by Western media. It aroused only mild concern among those Western human rights organizations that had previously gone all-out in their campaign to defend Pussy Riot.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 234</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;Crimean Parliament called for a referendum to leave Ukraine and return to Russia. This was a project that had been in the air ever since the Soviet Union disintegrated, severing Crimea from Russia. However, the Western powers refused to recognize the referendum, but volunteer international observers found the proceedings free and fair. On March 16, with 82% turnout, 96% of Crimeans voted to return to Russia.</p>
<p>&ldquo;As part of its Sebastopol lease, Russia already had troops stationed in Crimea. As a protective measure, Russia sent in reinforcements, without, however, exceeding the legal level of 25,000 troops. Not a shot was fired, nor was the vote marred by any violence.&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 236</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Crimea’s decision to secede from Ukraine apparently did violate the Ukrainian constitution – yet the constitution itself had just been violated by the putsch in Kiev, which created an entirely new situation. But there is no legal basis for the accusation that the Crimean referendum violated international law.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 237</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;In 1945, the Soviet Union liberated Eastern Europe. It stayed there too long, but finally left voluntarily nearly fifty years later. The United States liberated Western Europe and never left. At some point, a permanent “liberation” needs to be renamed as a conquest.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 239</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Just as Nitze exaggerated the Soviet military threat to Western Europe, Soros goes overboard when he asserts that: “it is unrealistic to expect that Putin will stop pushing beyond Ukraine when the division of Europe and its domination by Russia is in sight. Not only the survival of the new Ukraine but the future of NATO and the European Union itself is at risk…” There is method in such madness, since an official war scare gives big investors something to invest in, with guaranteed profits.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 241</div></div><p>I was unaware that Soros was propagandizing like this.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;It is also odd that the content of the downed aircraft’s black boxes was kept secret by Western governments, and that Western spokesmen, who gradually dropped the whole subject after the black boxes were found, began to issue statements suggesting that unfortunately, the truth may never be known. However, the anti-Russian accusations and the punishing sanctions persist.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 248</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Not so long ago, Libya was destroyed as a functioning society supposedly to protect a rebellion in Benghazi from theoretical government repression. Later, the United States urged the Kiev government to continue using its armed forces to suppress a rebellion in Donbass. Ukrainian President Petro Poroshenko is not being accused of “bombing his own people” – although that is exactly what is happening.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 250</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;In another speech, Obama attributed to Putin “a vision of the world in which might makes right – a world in which one nation’s borders can be redrawn by another, and civilized people are not allowed to recover the remains of their loved ones because of the truth that might be revealed. America stands for something different. We believe that right makes might – that bigger nations should not be able to bully smaller ones, and that people should be able to choose their own future.”</p>
<p>&ldquo;On January 21, Obama gloated to Congress that: “Last year, as we were doing the hard work of imposing sanctions along with our allies, some suggested that Mr. Putin’s aggression was a masterful display of strategy and strength. Well, today, it is America that stands strong and united with our allies, while Russia is isolated, with its economy in tatters.”&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 253</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Far from playing its constitutional role as the place where policy can be seriously debated, where foreign entanglements can be untangled and wars can be prevented, the U.S. Congress has degenerated into an echo chamber for lobbies and special interests, thoughtlessly endorsing the possibility of nuclear war with no more reflection that a sports star endorsing a soft drink. This frivolity indicates that the problem of Hillary Rodham Clinton goes far beyond a single individual and reveals a far deeper crisis in the American political system.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 258</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Ignoring the evidence, Washington has managed to go on claiming that it fought to save medical students in Grenada, bombed a chemical weapons factory in Sudan, prevented genocide in Kosovo, freed the women of Afghanistan, eliminated weapons of mass destruction in Iraq and saved the people of Libya from being eaten alive by a pitiless tyrant.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 259</div></div>      </div>
      </div>
        <div class="footer">
    <div class="footer-data"><div class="footer-links"><ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/contact.php" title="">Contact</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/support.php" title="">Support</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/privacy.php" title="">Privacy</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/rights.php" title="">Rights</a></li></ul></div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="copyright">Copyright (c) 1999-2026 earthli.com. All Rights Reserved.</div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="versions">Powered by <ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore/app_news.php">earthli News 3.7</a></li><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore" title="">earthli WebCore&trade; 3.7</a></li></ul></div></div>    </div>
      </div>
  </div>  </body>
</html>
]]>
  </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
      <title type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[Books read in 2019]]>
  </title>
    <id>https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3711</id>
    <link href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3711"/>
    <updated>2019-12-27T23:55:36+01:00</updated>
    <author>
        <name type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[Marco von Ballmoos]]>
  </name>
      <uri>https://earthli.com/users/marco</uri>
    </author>
      <summary type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<p>This year&rsquo;s list of books and reviews and notes got a little bit out of hand. As I&rsquo;ve done in other years, I&rsquo;ve included my notes and review of each book in this article as well as linked a separate article which includes the same notes and review, as well as citations and rough notes. So, this... [<a class="complete-text-link" href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3711">More</a>]</p>
]]>
  </summary>
      <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<html lang="en">
  <head>
    <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/themes/ice.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/fonts/raleway.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/core/medium.css">
  </head>
  <body>
<div class="style-controls">  <div class="page">
    <div class="page-body">
<div class="info-box-top">
<p>
Published by <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_user.php?name=marco" title="Marco von Ballmoos" class="visible">marco</a> on <span class="date-time">27. Dec 2019 23:55:36 (GMT-5)</span>
</p>
<p>
Updated by <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_user.php?name=marco" title="Marco von Ballmoos" class="visible">marco</a> on <span class="date-time">28. Dec 2019 00:01:41 (GMT-5)</span>
</p>
</div>
      <div class="text-flow wide">
  <p>This year&rsquo;s list of books and reviews and notes got a little bit out of hand. As I&rsquo;ve done in other years, I&rsquo;ve included my notes and review of each book in this article as well as linked a separate article which includes the same notes and review, as well as citations and rough notes. So, this article weighs in at about 64 pages.</p>
<p>This was a big year, with 32 books and long essays/novellas/papers documented here, including seven long books about climate change and humanity&rsquo;s future (2 in German) as well as two books on public policy and media and three books/essays on rape and feminism. A handful of technical volumes and more than a dozen fiction books (several checking out new authors) round out the year.</p>
<dl><dt class="field">Eine kurze Geschichte der Menschheit (2011 – 2013/de)</dt>
<dd><div class=" "><p>by <em>Yuval Noah Harari</em></p>
<p>This book was originally written in Hebrew—I read the German translation. It&rsquo;s about what the title says: &ldquo;a short history of mankind&rdquo;. The story starts hundreds of thousands of years ago, with Cro-Magnons and Neanderthals, discussing current theories for the diasporas of both and extinction of the latter. From there, we discuss the current theories about hunter-gatherer lifestyle and the &ldquo;cognitive revolution&rdquo; that led to the utter domination of other species by the physically weaker human being. Harari discusses the truly staggering degree to which humans wiped everything else of any significant size—anything that it didn&rsquo;t later domesticate.</p>
<p>Viewed from this high vantage, humans really are a plague, preying on and twisting everything to their will, destroying whatever they cannot subsume.</p>
<p>After that, society transitions to agriculture. Harari points out that every massive change that mankind has accepted and applied to itself globally isn&rsquo;t necessarily an <em>improvement</em>. With agriculture, people were working harder than ever to get a lower-quality life. Congruent with this shift was the beginning of the first elites among men. Though most had lives that were harder and more insecure and more <em>boring</em>—they were increasingly trapped on their lands and lost their nomadic lifestyle—than those of their hunger-gatherer ancestors, a select view lived spectacular lives. These would continue to shape culture and inclinations to ensure that they and their descendants would continue to benefit in this way. Morality didn&rsquo;t enter into it.</p>
<p>Harari has a very western attitude toward humanity—at-times seeming to chastise other cultures for failing to fight back adequately against the more rapacious Europeans. Progress as defined by Europe is taken to be an inevitability—the other countries and peoples of the world are responsible for not having progressed as quickly or more quickly than Europeans. He often has the right facts at hand, but leaves the reader to come to his or her own conclusions. For example, he expresses puzzlement that the Chinese didn&rsquo;t try to blow each other up with gunpowder-based weapons of war <em>for centuries</em> whereas the Europeans did so nearly immediately upon seeing the technology. He implicitly attributes this to westerners somehow being cleverer monkeys when a dearth of morality on their part would also explain the disparity.</p>
<p>The Europeans won because they were more rapacious and cruel and much more ready to consider their fellow humans as lower animals, to be used to satisfy their own abstract needs. Perhaps it was a higher ability to abstract away responsibility under multiple societal layers designed to absolve responsibility—this is a mechanism still heavily used today. Humans set up rules to their own benefit, then explain their overwhelming and grotesque riches as the natural workings of some higher power (i.e. &ldquo;the market&rdquo;). As Harari would say: these are fairy tales we tell ourselves and others to get what we want. That is, in Harari&rsquo;s opinion, humanity&rsquo;s main ability—that fictitious concepts become somehow more important than physical reality.</p>
<p>Harari is a good storyteller and summarizes many interesting facets of the sweep of history. However, he isn&rsquo;t as opinionated as the facts he relates would require him to be. The result is that he looks either obtuse or biased. He shies away from judgment—and he&rsquo;s too smart not to have noticed the natural conclusions to much of the information he cites. My gut feeling in some places was that he was hedging his bets so as to continue to be regarded favorably by the elites whose crimes he has partially documented. That is, he wants to sell his books and his presence, so he leaves the condemnation up to the reader. </p>
<p>I&rsquo;ve included <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id= 3709">notes, citations and errata</a> in a separate post.</p>
</div></dd>
<dt class="field">Spectre is here to stay: An analysis of side-channels and speculative execution (2019)</dt>
<dd><div class=" "><p>by <em>Ross Mcilroy, Jaroslav Sevcik, Tobias Tebbi, Ben L. Titzer, Toon Verwaest</em></p>
<p>This <a href="https://arxiv.org/abs/1902.05178">paper</a> (<cite><a href="http://arxiv.org/">arXiv</a></cite>) focuses only on intra-process attacks, advocating for mitigation via separation into multiple processes, using hardware-level protection that provides a stronger guarantee.</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;This paper explores speculative side-channel attacks and their implications for programming languages. These attacks leak information through micro-architectural side-channels which we show are not mere bugs, but in fact lie at the foundation of optimization.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>This paper proves unequivocally that software mitigation of intra-process, side-channel attacks are futile. An attack is always possible, with a combination of scaling for any-resolution timers and patience. <span class="quote-inline">&ldquo;As we have seen, access to a timer, no matter the resolution, leaks µ-architectural information.&rdquo;</span> Type-checks in any languages may partially mitigate, but this paper proves that they cannot full mitigate and are, therefore, largely useless for data-security.</p>
<p>The only difference is the bit-rate of extracted information, not whether information can be extracted. They not only proved this with theorems, they implemented many of the attacks to provide accurate estimates of the expected extraction bit-rates in the presence of various mitigations.</p>
<p>There is one particularly virulent variant (#4) that has literally no mitigation. </p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Mitigating type confusion for stack slots alone would have required a complete redesign of the backend of the optimizing compiler, perhaps man years of work, without a guarantee of completeness.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>As anyone who&rsquo;s been following this problem suspected (or pretty much already knew), the world traded of security for performance long ago. Though chip manufacturers and operating-system designers paid lip service to security, performance improvements were paramount.</p>
<p>We&rsquo;ve known since the end of 2017, but now we have proof. The paper sums it up more nicely than I could,</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Our models, our mental models, are wrong; we have been trading security for performance and complexity all along and didn’t know it. It is now a painful irony that today, defense requires even more complexity with software mitigations, most of which we know to be incomplete. And complexity makes these three open problems all that much harder. Spectre is perhaps, too appropriately named, as it seems destined to haunt us for a long time.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>I&rsquo;ve included <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id= 3719">notes, citations and errata</a> in a separate post.</p>
</div></dd>
<dt class="field">Norse Mythology (2017)</dt>
<dd><div class=" "><p>by <em>Neil Gaiman</em></p>
<p>This book is Gaiman&rsquo;s retelling of the known Norse legends in his own voice and with his inimitable style. If you pay attention, it doesn&rsquo;t take long to notice that the Norse Gods are mostly jerks to each other and everyone else and have no notion of fairness whatsoever. They are happy to take whatever they can, however they can get it and then the have to gall to hate on Loki for doing it back to them better than they do it to everyone else. Loki is an evil little fuck, but he&rsquo;s no more amoral than the others. It could be argued that he&rsquo;s actually <em>good</em> for wanting to eliminate the manipulative lot of them.</p>
<p>In which I learn that Loki is Thor’s uncle, not his brother. In which I did not even learn that while reading it, but had to have it pointed out to me by my wife after I’d urged her to read this book. On a positive note: I have now learned this thing.</p>
<p>I also learned that Hel is the guardian of the Hel, the destination for everyone who has not earned the right to rest eternally in Valhalla, that Jormungundr is the Midgard serpent (also known as Ouroboros) and that Fenris Wolf is larger than any other creature and is destined to destroy the Gods during Ragnarok. Surtr will help, wielding a world-sized flaming sword. I learned that Fenris, Jormungundr and Hel are Loki&rsquo;s children, making him nearly the most-central character in the whole mythos.</p>
<p>As you can expect from tall tales of this sort, the relative sizes and strengths of the cast varies wildly—each story introduces a new heretofore unknown giant from a heretofore unknown region who is even bigger and more powerful than all other giants before him or her. Thor still manages to kick everyone&rsquo;s ass, though. Thor&rsquo;s fight with the Midgard serpent was particularly confusing vis à vis scale, since that particular serpent goes around the entire <em>world</em>.</p>
<p>Still, super-neat stories, well-told. Would read again.</p>
<p>I&rsquo;ve included <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id= 3720">notes, citations and errata</a> in a separate post.</p>
</div></dd>
<dt class="field">On Tyranny: Twenty Lessons from the Twentieth Century (2017)</dt>
<dd><div class=" "><p>by <em>Ted Snyder</em></p>
<p>This book was recommended to me by an ordinarily more-reliable friend, but I don&rsquo;t hold it against zim. I was relieved to receive a &ldquo;your library loan is about to end&rdquo; message about my E-Book because, as I was reading the book, I realized with dread that I couldn&rsquo;t remember whether I&rsquo;d found it in the library or whether I&rsquo;d actually purchased it (it&rsquo;s a short book, so probably doesn&rsquo;t cost very much).</p>
<p>The blurbs and description of this book are very misleading. It is about Trump. That is not, at first, obvious. Trump is never mentioned by name. Instead, Snyder refers to him as &ldquo;the president&rdquo; in what I can only assume is a bid to seem clever, but ends up being a gambit that fools no-one reading the book <em>right now</em>. In ten or twenty years time, however, absolutely no-one is going to know what the actual fuck Snyder is talking about.</p>
<p>The book is a confusing mish-mash even when read this close to publication. It will not stand the test of time. Snyder&rsquo;s 20 rules are quite a stretch—many of them are nearly direct reformulations of other rules. They sound different superficially, but are more like a horoscope in that regard.</p>
<p>As I read the book, I thought Snyder was a self-educated 20-something or 70-something. I discovered after completing the book that he&rsquo;s a highly ranked professor at the Yale School of Management. It&rsquo;s ridiculous how poorly written and poorly thought-through this book is. He knows his market, though, it&rsquo;s a best-seller.</p>
<p>I&rsquo;ve included <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id= 3721">notes, citations and errata</a> in a separate post.</p>
</div></dd>
<dt class="field">The Worst is Yet to Come (2019)</dt>
<dd><div class=" "><p>by <em>Peter Fleming</em></p>
<p>Though this book was occasionally better-written and often more coherent than Snyder&rsquo;s (reviewed above), I occasionally got the same feeling that the author was squeezing his material to fit his premise (exactly as Snyder did). </p>
<p>The thesis that everything can—and probably will—get worse, is so broad that the author feels comfortable hanging pretty much anything he can think of happening in the world on it and try to make it stick. It&rsquo;s not uninteresting to see how his observations from life in London translate to premonitions of further doom, but it&rsquo;s also only rarely convincing.</p>
<p>And still he only got to about 160 pages, with a very generously sized &ldquo;Glossary&rdquo;, which was just another hodge-podge of mini-essays that he couldn&rsquo;t be bothered to integrate into the rest of the book.</p>
<p>I was grateful that I didn&rsquo;t buy this book, either. At least Snyder&rsquo;s felt like it&rsquo;d had an editor who&rsquo;d actually looked at it. Fleming&rsquo;s book was rife with typos, outright misspellings and bad grammar. At one point, he wrote &ldquo;tranny&rdquo; instead of &ldquo;tyranny&rdquo;. &lsquo;Nuff said.</p>
<p>I&rsquo;ve included <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id= 3723">notes, citations and errata</a> in a separate post.</p>
</div></dd>
<dt class="field">Nation (2009)</dt>
<dd><div class=" "><p>by <em>Terry Pratchett</em></p>
<p>This is the story of Mau. It is also the story of Daphne née Ermintrude. There are also the priest Ataba, the strong woman Chale, the brothers Pilu and Milo on the island. The island is known as the Nation. Actually, it is the people who are the Nation. The island is where the Nation lives.</p>
<p>As Mau is on his way back from another island on which he underwent his manhood ritual, a giant wave sweeps him up and carries him back to the Nation. It is a truly titanic wave and it sweeps away everyone he&rsquo;s ever known—they were all sleeping on the beach, awaiting his return.</p>
<p>Mau is young, but resourceful. He enters a fugue state to take care of all of the bodies left on the island. He wakes to a mango on a plate next to him.</p>
<p>The plate had been delivered to him by Daphne, the lone surviving member of the crew and passengers of the <em>Sweet Judy</em>, a ship that the wave deposited deep in the only forest on the Nation. Daphne and Mau meet and join forces to try to survive on the island.</p>
<p>More wave-survivors straggle ashore over the next days and weeks. They struggle with their future, mostly fighting about what it means for the Gods to have allowed the wave to sweep away everything.</p>
<p>They scavenge the Judy for supplies—Mau is concerned that they are relying to strongly on &ldquo;trouserman&rdquo; inventions. He wonders why his people never invented anything so spectacular. They discover secrets on the island; Mau&rsquo;s curiosity and skepticism leads to more conclusions than anyone&rsquo;s made about his culture in a long time. Daphne does the same—she is a scientist, taught by her father—but from the Women&rsquo;s Place.</p>
<p>The world on the outside is pressing in: England is without a King and a long, long line of successors have dropped like flies, leaving Daphne&rsquo;s father as King, and Daphne as Princess. She doesn&rsquo;t find out until late in the game. They must first attend to the matter of the Raiders—a cannibal tribe—who&rsquo;ve joined up with the surviving remnants of the part of Judy&rsquo;s crew that mutinied before the wave.</p>
<p>The world here is an alternate version of the Pacific in 1860, called the Pelagic Ocean, with a smattering of amusingly named islands. The society and history feels very familiar, different enough for distance, but close enough to make satirical and insightful observations about our own reality.</p>
<p>That is the skeleton of story on which Pratchett&rsquo;s writing hangs. It is highly interesting, but it&rsquo;s not the best part of the book. The best parts are about science, multiple worlds, Gods, death and history. As with the Discworld books, Pratchett is just as interested in the subtext as in the story. He puts the interesting bits in the folds of the shrouds hanging on the story.</p>
<p>As in the Discworld books, there are a slew of good characters, each with delightful internal monologues. There are bad ones as well, funny and insightful in their own way (e.g. Cox). It seems that Pratchett books are Pratchett books, no matter where they&rsquo;re set. A lovely read. Highly recommended.</p>
<p>I&rsquo;ve included <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id= 3734">notes, citations and errata</a> in a separate post.</p>
</div></dd>
<dt class="field">Russia Without Putin: Money, Power and the Myths of the New Cold War (2018)</dt>
<dd><div class=" "><p>by <em>Tony Wood</em></p>
<p>I&rsquo;d listened to a couple of interviews with Tony Wood (on <em>This is Hell</em> with <em>Chuck Mertz</em> and <em>Behind the News</em> with <em>Doug Henwood</em>) and became interested in his book through his eloquent discussions of Russia. The book details the last three decades of history in Russia, from Gorbachev to Yeltsin and then Putin.</p>
<p>More specifically, he describes a Russia that&rsquo;s explicitly <em>not</em> its leader. Instead, it is a country that used to be much more powerful than it is now. It used to be much more advanced, more equal. Most importantly, it is <em>not</em> a capitalist failure. It is not retreating to its statist past. It would be better if it were. Instead, it is essentially a success story for the West: they helped suck the money and resources from a once-powerful enemy, creating a country for the 1%—in the image of its western forebears.</p>
<p>Mostly, Russia wasn&rsquo;t able to grow in a direction that would benefit itself. Instead, its massive resources and well-educated population were wasted or channeled to purposes conducive to the rulers of the rest of the world. If Russia&rsquo;s collapse benefitted the rich, then it was deemed to be &ldquo;reforming&rdquo;; otherwise, it was deemed to be &ldquo;yearning for the USSR&rdquo;. The formula was predictable and boring and effective.</p>
<p>All of Russia&rsquo;s corruption is utterly unremarkable and non-unique. Similar corruption exists in the U.S. and Britain and, at least to some degree, a handful of other western countries. When Wood describes the degree to which large banks and industries control policy in Russia, there is no real difference from how it works in the U.S, or Germany for that matter.</p>
<p>Is Russia&rsquo;s government saturated with industry insiders? Yes. How is that any different from Obama’s Goldman Sachs alums, chosen by Citibank? Or Trump’s coterie of industry insiders, each matched to the cabinet position that looks most like a henhouse to them?</p>
<p>Russia never had a chance: it was to be a vassal to the West or was to suffer until it acquiesced. There was never going to be another way. Russia is geographically huge, but has a relatively small population. It has a ton of resources and a well-educated populace, but it has a low birthrate (well-educated) and an unwelcome immigration wave is its only hope. Its economy is tied up with its resources—controlled by its enemies through control of commodity prices.</p>
<p>Russia occupies a middle ground. It has the low birthrate, culture, military hardware, attitude and high education of an advanced nation, but the life-expectancy and reputation of a poorer one. And America hates them, which makes their European and British lackeys do so as well, at least sometimes.</p>
<p>Putin and his attitudes and opinions are totally beside the point. Russia is its own thing—and its unclear how it will survive in a world with a powerful country like the US in control, bent on its submission.</p>
<p>I&rsquo;ve included <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3737">notes, citations and errata</a> in a separate post.</p>
</div></dd>
<dt class="field">Jennifer Government (2003)</dt>
<dd><div class=" "><p>by <em>Max Barry</em></p>
<p>This 2003 book is the story of a world in which many of the current capitulations to corporatist rule were still at-least partially in the future. The Government is an entity whose power has been severely restricted. Local police is for-hire only. They only pursue cases for which victims can provide a budget.</p>
<p>Hack Nike works for Nike (everyone takes their employer&rsquo;s name as their last name). He is roped into a murder contract by John Nike. It is part of a marketing campaign to sell sneakers to stupid teenagers. Marketing rules supreme, people are nearly perfect consumers, ethics is a thing of the past. Hack lives with the unemployed Victoria, who is working on a virus that can kill any IT system.</p>
<p>Buy Mitsui is a broker who loses faith in the system. Claire is Violet&rsquo;s socialist sister. The eponymous Jennifer Government is a former marketer turned federal agent, hot on John Nike&rsquo;s tail, with whom she shares a past.</p>
<p>The main thread of the book is that most corporations are banding together into two factions, roughly delineated by the two prevalent rewards programs. The corporations and various alliances act more and more as independent states, with their own militaries (e.g. the NRA). Everything is a negotiation, everything is a transaction, money is God, all in the name of a bizarre notion of &ldquo;freedom&rdquo;.</p>
<p>There is no difference between corporations and nation-states. In fact, the book generally depicts corporations acting as the worst of the nation-states do today. Even those individuals who think they can game this system are wrong. The point is that contracts aren’t worth the paper they’re printed on if they can’t be enforced. If there is no overarching authority, then criminals do what they want. Only the worst people win.</p>
<p>There are echoes of <em>Fight Club</em> and <em>Office Space</em> and maybe even <em>Mr. Robot</em>. It&rsquo;s interesting to see these ideas having been written down 15 years ago, before many of its ideas were confirmed—or vastly superseded by the system we have today.</p>
<p>Barry does bring us a happy ending of sorts, but only for a handful of characters—the world itself is largely unchanged, even if corporate power is slightly restrained. The base philosophy hasn&rsquo;t changed, so the same problems will come back.</p>
<p>I&rsquo;ve included <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id= 3739">notes, citations and errata</a> in a separate post.</p>
</div></dd>
<dt class="field">Adjustment Day (2018)</dt>
<dd><div class=" "><p>by <em>Chuck Palahniuk</em></p>
<p>This story is told in flashbacks and flash-forwards, cutting back and forth between myriad characters. My summary untangles this all a bit.</p>
<p>This is the story of a brovolution, the logical conclusion of an increasingly divided population in America. It starts with a kidnapping. Walter hatches a plan to win Shasta&rsquo;s heart (captured within her voluptuous curves) by showing her how rich he&rsquo;s become. It&rsquo;s a standard adolescent fantasy. He thinks that he will get a new &ldquo;old man&rdquo; to teach him how to become rich. He kidnaps Talbott, a man who turns out to be even crazier than Walter.</p>
<p>In a reversal of the kidnapping situation, the old man tests Walter, finds him worthy and begins to order him about, pretending to acquiesce to his demand to &ldquo;make him rich&rdquo;. Walter wonders at the old man&rsquo;s convoluted approach, but trusts that it will work out. The whole time, the old man is tied naked to a chair, covered in the wounds from hundreds of cuts made by Walter as he searched for a subdermal tracker Talbott insisted he had, but which he&rsquo;d lied about to &ldquo;test&rdquo; Walter&rsquo;s dedication.</p>
<p>Walter becomes Talbott&rsquo;s amanuensis as he rants and raves, dictating the text that would become the blue-black book &ldquo;Adjustment Day&rdquo;. We would later learn that Talbott had said &ldquo;A Judgment Day&rdquo; and be led to wonder along with Walter what else he&rsquo;d mis-transcribed in a book that would become the user&rsquo;s manual for the next revolution in America.</p>
<p>The book drives people to revolution by revealing an age-old secret: older and middle-aged men have provoked and will continue to occasionally provoke wars in which they cull a useless younger—and expectant/hopeful— generation of men, simultaneously clearing out their rivals <em>and</em> reducing available men to such a minimum that women have no choice but to allow them much more leeway in order to ensure the survival of humanity. Men gain power through their self-imposed scarcity.</p>
<p>It is madness, of course. But there are enough who would start packing their go-bags at this point. Palahniuk knows this and plays to the stereotype.</p>
<p>Sneakily, the book has some pearls of wisdom—true revolutionary ideas not poisoned by Talbott&rsquo;s mad worldview—spread throughout. He makes some good points, but his proposed solutions are pure bullshit. E.g.</p>
<ul>
<li><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;“But identity politics,” Dawson continued, “has reduced the homosexual to nothing but his sexual preference. It has reduced the black to only his skin. And each has become a caricature of his former dignified self.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></li>
<li><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;[…] our lifetimes must not be measured in weekends. Our time on Earth must not be judged by wages earned and taxes paid.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></li>
<li><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;It was clear to Jamal that for whites their guilt constituted a uniquely white form of boasting. Their breast beating was a humblebrag always saying: We did this! We thwarted God in the Garden! We killed his son! We white people will do with other races and natural resources as we see fit! Showing off disguised as a mea culpa. For the white man, his guilt was his biggest badge of accomplishment. Only whites killed the planet with global warming so only whites could save it. Their boasting never let up. It was the white racket: Creating problems so they could rescue everybody.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></li>
<li><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;To make a career of rescuing people is also to create a permanent class in need of rescue.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></li>
<li><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Making others right makes them love you, according to Talbott, because we only love things we feel superior to. We only love those who don’t pose a threat. Making others right is the best method for controlling them.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></li></ul><p>The revolution starts with an online List. It is &ldquo;America&rsquo;s Least Wanted&rdquo;. Anyone can nominate someone for the list. Anyone can vote for people on the list. Those with the most votes remain; those without enough votes in a certain timespan are culled from the list. The others? They are to be culled come Adjustment Day.</p>
<p>When Adjustment Day comes, the members of the first lineages—hand-chosen cells full of people frustrated by society&rsquo;s utter subordination and humiliation and indoctrinated in the ways of Talbott&rsquo;s book—roll out, hunting down the people on The List, gaining the number of points allocated to that person and being able to use those points to participate in the new &ldquo;democracy&rdquo; that rises from the ashes of the slaughtered one. There are giant lime-lined pits waiting to receive the bodies of America&rsquo;s Least Wanted.</p>
<p>It is interesting that several of the members of the first lineage were students of one of the professors marked for slaughter, Brolly. Despite them having marked him for eradication, they would occasionally draw a parallel between what happened post-Adjustment Day and what Brolly had taught them from the world&rsquo;s literature and history in classes deemed otherwise &ldquo;useless&rdquo; by the Book.</p>
<p>There are myriad characters, all involved in the plot to overthrow America. The overthrow begins at about a third of the way through the book. In the rest, we watch the new countries develop in the ashes. The first third—maybe 40%—looks and feels like a flawless execution of the red-pill revolution frustrated whites are fantasizing about online all the time. There are cracks and little hints of doubt throughout, but a superficial and partial reading will find critics leveling charges of alt-rightism at Palahniuk. But read on to see the whole thing quickly careen into a mess far greater than what we have today.</p>
<p>The author lets the revolution go off without a single hitch. Everything goes perfectly as planned. There are no weak liberators, scared to shoot, no legislators worthy of redemption. Only professor Brolly in Jamal&rsquo;s head, living on as lessons Jamal didn&rsquo;t even realize he&rsquo;d learned, belying the uselessness with which education had been tagged in the Book.</p>
<p>In a way, the cruelty and coldness of the revolutionaries is uniform and unbelievable. Still, it was better in a way than the constant mercy/betrayal cycle in <em>Seveneves</em> by Neal Stephenson, where the protagonists let the legislators and former rulers live, only to see them worm their way back to power, again and again and again. The steeliness was a welcome change.</p>
<p>But pothead Walter and his gonads inspired everything, with his lust for Shasta. It&rsquo;s wonderfully done by Palahniuk. And for the other revolutionaries, always it comes down to the same thing, all the high-minded rhetoric masks the single question: can I fuck it? Men rule, women drool (literally, in Shasta&rsquo;s case, when she&rsquo;s &ldquo;proving&rdquo; her pure whiteness). The male fantasy doesn&rsquo;t stretch very far. The white male fantasy even less so.</p>
<p>Gaysia, Blacktopia and Caucasia are the main countries, with obvious segregated populations. There are complicated rules for mixed-race citizens and sexual preference takes precedence over race. Asians are sent back to Asia and Latinos sent to somewhere in South America. Jews go to Israel. It is crude and hews closely to the simplistic plans and ideas easily found on the Internet.</p>
<p>Blacktopia rides high, becoming the seat of technology based on the ancient nigh-magical secret science that blacks had long hidden from their oppressors. Caucasia reverts to medieval times, barely surviving in a benighted manner. Gaysia struggles to produce children, devolving to a country that forces its male members to donate sperm and its females to host children.</p>
<p>The revolution ends with a whimper, having destroyed much more than it repaired, being viewed as a failure by all save perhaps the denizens of Blacktopia. The world, presumably, looks on, bemused and vaguely embarrassed for America&rsquo;s inability to act grown-up.</p>
<p>I&rsquo;ve included <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id= 3742">notes, citations and errata</a> in a separate post.</p>
</div></dd>
<dt class="field">Starlings (2018)</dt>
<dd><div class=" "><p>by <em>Jo Walton</em></p>
<p>I&rsquo;d recently read about Jo Walton, that she&rsquo;d won several awards (Hugo, Nebula) and was intrigued. I grabbed the only book the library had available, a book of her short stories. Her preface, though, indicated that she wasn&rsquo;t really a short-story writer and had never really understood the genre. She was, unfortunately, right. I think she&rsquo;s a good writer, but her short stories felt too underdeveloped. Several of the stories—she admitted—were just books she&rsquo;d started and never finished. There were some interesting ideas, but nothing really memorable.</p>
<p>I&rsquo;ll try again with a full-length novel.</p>
<p>I&rsquo;ve included <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id= 3753">notes, citations and errata</a> in a separate post.</p>
</div></dd>
<dt class="field">Reaper Man (1991)</dt>
<dd><div class=" "><p>by <em>Terry Pratchett</em></p>
<p>This is an early story of one of Pratchett&rsquo;s favorite characters: Death. It&rsquo;s wonderfully written, one of Pratchett&rsquo;s best.</p>
<p>In it, Death takes a vacation. He goes to work on a farm. He has a vacation romance with the proprietress.</p>
<p>The rest of the Discworld must deal with the temporary loss of death. Ghosts pile up. The wizards of Ankh Morporkh University try to get to the bottom of it. Reg Shoe—the zombie—pleas for the rights of the dead gain more weight as the number of the dead threatens to outweigh that of the living.</p>
<p>To fix this problem, humanity envisions a new Death, who comes for the old Death. Their battle is short. The old Death didn&rsquo;t enjoy his job or his power—his stoicism and dedication win out over a lust for power.</p>
<p>Death gets special dispensation for his fling—Mrs. Flitworth—from Azrael, the galaxy-sized cat who was there before the universe and will be there after.</p>
<p>I&rsquo;ve included <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id= 3752">notes, citations and errata</a> in a separate post.</p>
</div></dd>
<dt class="field">Dreyer&rsquo;s English (2019)</dt>
<dd><div class=" "><p>by <em>Benjamin Dreyer</em></p>
<p>Dreyer is copy chief at Random House Books. He throws his hat into the ring, offering sage and drily humorous grammatical advice based on his 30 years of experience. For nitty gritty and details of grammar, he refers readers to the classic style guides. His book is for broad strokes about the various linguistic constructs and common patterns, tropes and styles he&rsquo;s encountered—and that he&rsquo;d like to stop encountering.</p>
<p>He is, at core, pragmatic:</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;A good sentence, I find myself saying frequently, is one that the reader can follow from beginning to end, no matter how long it is, without having to double back in confusion because the writer misused or omitted a key piece of punctuation, chose a vague or misleading pronoun, or in some other way engaged in inadvertent misdirection.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>But he isn&rsquo;t a pedantic or precise scientist, either. While I&rsquo;m willing to be convinced by his argument for serial commas—always use them, because they&rsquo;re often helpful, so why not just get used to them?—he argues in the opposite manner when writing about hyphens, where he argues that <span class="quote-inline">&ldquo;convention […] allows for exceptions in some cases in which a misreading is unlikely, as in, say: real estate agent or high school students&rdquo;</span>, to which I say, why?</p>
<p>Who would it harm to clean up English&rsquo;s ridiculous word-concatenation rules (or is it &ldquo;word concatenation&rdquo; or why not wordconcatentation)? Some agglutinations take a space, others none and others a hyphen—pretty much depending on how long the compound has existed and … whimsy. I prefer throwing an extra hyphen at real-estate agents or high-school students simply because there is often so much confusion where neither the author nor the copy editor anticipated there being some.</p>
<p>I&rsquo;m grateful for his having cleared up proper-name hyphenation for me, though, as well as the proper use of hyphens and en dashes (which I&rsquo;d heretofore used <em>almost</em> correctly).</p>
<p>He throws in chapters on oft-misused vocabulary—as well as some rare, but lovely, vocabulary—as well as a couple on idioms and common constructs. Some of the chapters are just lists, but that makes this an excellent reference.</p>
<p>I&rsquo;ve included <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id= 3751">notes, citations and errata</a> in a separate post.</p>
</div></dd>
<dt class="field">Summa Technologiae (Electronic Mediations) (1964; en: 2013)</dt>
<dd><div class=" "><p>by <em>Stanislaw Lem</em></p>
<p>This is a non-fiction work translated from the original Polish. It is not a light work: it encompasses Lem&rsquo;s complex and intricate musings and theories on technology, nature, genetics, cosmology, philosophy, biology, information theory, ecology, virtual reality, artificial intelligence, cybernetics, robots, programming, identity (cloning), human nature and how these all relate to mankind&rsquo;s possible future or lack thereof. He discusses the likely shape of galactic civilizations as well as the possible composition or origins of its components, where their intelligence comes from, where it would likely develop, where it wouldn&rsquo;t, why science fiction is lazy and, above all, he keeps the discussion rigorously supported by data, even when he seems to be engaging in the most whimsical flights of fancy.</p>
<p>It&rsquo;s hard to summarize this book any less vaguely than that. It&rsquo;s just chock-full of relatively advanced thinking—especially for the time, over 50 years ago—of an extremely intelligent and, by all accounts, intellectually rigorous man. I&rsquo;ll use some of his own citations to illustrate what I found so exciting in such a weighty and densely written tome (it took me quite a while to make my way through it).</p>
<p>Much of what he has to say has been said in other places, but perhaps less eloquently, and not all in one place, connected into a coherent strand of pearls that actually give a framework to thoughts about the future of not only humanity, but any form of intelligence, regardless of where or how it arises.</p>
<p>On the pace of development outpacing humanity&rsquo;s societal structures (i.e. the wisdom of elders):</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;When the entire life of a future generation ceases to be a repetition of their parents’ lives, what kinds of lessons and instructions can the old, experienced as they are, offer to the young?&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>On the necessary narrowing of intellectual pursuit, with each decision to take a certain branch leaving less energy and intellectual capacity and effort to pursue other, possibly more societally lucrative, paths.</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Briefly put, technoevolution brings more evil than good, with man turning out to be a prisoner of what he himself has created. The growth of his knowledge is accompanied by the narrowing down of possibilities when it comes to deciding about his own fate.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>There is no avoiding this: there is only improving the odds that the chosen path is fruitful. In this vein, any civilization—humanity definitely included—only has so much energy and intellectual capacity for missteps. The more advanced, the more likely that an effort will be able to appropriate a large amount of the available resources. In this, Lem presages our coming battle with climate change: we don&rsquo;t have unlimited &ldquo;lives&rdquo; to start over (as in a video game). Instead, we must marshal our resources carefully.</p>
<p>The profit motive is an unreliable siren here; in the past, we have expended considerable wasted effort &ldquo;optimizing&rdquo; for the best solution, throwing incredible resources at a problem, only to end up with a good solution, but with very high cost. In this way, we are emulating Evolution&rsquo;s inefficient process, copying the only creator we know. But our effort to extract ourselves from the narrowing chasm of climate change will require a more precise investment of resources.</p>
<p>We are unlikely to do so and will die out. Lem wonders whether that is the nearly unavoidable fate of many civilizations: why would humanity, with all of its faults, and its massively redundant but ultimately unreliable biological machinery, be different?</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Are we really supposed to believe that, when looking at the sky above us, we are seeing an abyss filled with worlds that have already been turned to ashes by the power of their suicidal intelligence or that are headed directly toward such an end?&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>How would the main driver of change, Evolution, be able to help us avoid such a fate? Humanity&rsquo;s intellect allows it to destroy itself much more quickly than Evolution could possibly react.</p>
<p>Because we&rsquo;re smarter than that? Not really. Lem offers a definition of intelligence that is humbling—all the more so because it is frighteningly accurate and utterly devoid of artifice that romanticizes mankind as &ldquo;special&rdquo;.</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;By Intelligence we understand a second-level homeostatic regulator that is capable of coping with disturbances to its environment thanks to the activities in which it engages on the basis of the historically acquired knowledge.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>He is similarly calculating and sober about the purpose of societies. It is hard to find fault with his description, at least at the high level where it truly matters.</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;What to an observer from a different culture may look like a most irrational type of social ties, obligations, imperatives, and prohibitions has practically always aimed at the same goal: reducing the individual spontaneity of action and its diversity—which is a potential source of disturbance to the state of equilibrium.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>In his discussion of artificial—or &ldquo;machine&rdquo; (designed)—intelligence, he offers up an interesting and understandable analogy to describe the &ldquo;gap&rdquo; in intelligence between different levels of beings (instead of trying to pretend that knowledge and wisdom make no difference).</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;In undertaking a reduction, a machine will thus be doing what a physicist is doing when explaining gravitational wave theory to a wide audience by taking recourse to a modest arsenal of school-level math.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>As for how these machines might work, he looks to the most complex machines heretofore designed: us. Evolution may have expended a shamefully wasteful amount of energy and time designing and refining us, but there is no arguing that she came up with a relatively robust machine. That is not to say that there isn&rsquo;t a tremendous amount of room for improvement with a more focused design process, but that the human machine is still more advanced and impressive than anything that man has managed to design and build.</p>
<p>The key is autonomous systems, to focus the intellect on higher-order functions.</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The more complex a system is, the more overall regulation is needed, and the smaller the extent to which local oscillations of parameters can be allowed. Does our brain have regulatory control over our body? Undoubtedly it does. Is every one of us in control of our own body? Only within a narrow range of parameters; the rest is “given” to us by Nature, in all its wisdom.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>He marvels at the machine that Nature has built, but thinks that we can eventually do better. He doesn&rsquo;t disparage Nature, but also does not consider it to be magically unsurpassable.</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;[…] “coded”in the language of chemical molecules, which could develop from this sperm after it has been combined with an egg. This plan apparently consists of “production rules”and “directions for action.”In that microscopic space, there is information about what has to be done, information about how it has to be done, and last but not least, a mechanism that will enact all this.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>He even considers what identity is and how the ability to clone or store or copy or transmit an individual would affect it. It is interesting to see this treatise by someone who doesn&rsquo;t confine himself to just one field, be it philosophy, biology or ethics. Instead, Lem approaches from the coldly rational realm of a cyberneticist with experience and wisdom in all of these fields, arriving at a more acceptable and logical conclusion than any individual familiar with only one of these fields could.</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;A twin is indeed a perfect molecular copy of the “original.”Yet the similarity between two states of the same person—when he is eight and eighty years old, respectively—is no doubt even smaller than the mutual similarity between the twins. Despite this, anyone would admit that the child and the old man are the same person—something we cannot say about the two brothers. It is therefore not the amount of analogous genetic information that determines the continuation of existence but rather the fact of being genetically identical, even if the dynamic structure of the brain undergoes significant changes during one’s lifetime.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>Finally, Lem reassures us that future developments—especially cybernetic or robotic ones—are inevitable if we are to survive. Our past as frail biological shells has served us well to get to where we are, but we will never develop to a galactic and nigh-eternal civilization if we cling to these crude origins. Instead, we should see the intelligence that we have as enough of a lever to bootstrap ourselves into the next level.</p>
<p>Even if our biological shells can&rsquo;t go along, our progeny will. We will either have to adapt or die. That includes modifying our genotype to &ldquo;improve&rdquo; it—which entails making moral judgments about what it means to improve something (i.e. value judgments about which humans are worth promoting). So has it always been and so will it always be. Avoiding these decisions because of a temporary luxury to do so will be fatal. We can obstinately refuse and instead elect to die out.</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;We have to admit that the extent to which control will remain in human hands partly depends on a point of view. The fact that man is able to swim by himself does not mean that he is capable of crossing an ocean without a ship—not to mention jets and space rockets in this context! A similar evolution is starting, in a kind of parallel way, in the information universe. Man is capable of directing a gnostic machine toward a problem that he could perhaps solve by himself (either he himself or his great grandchildren), but in the process, the machine may open his eyes to a problem whose existence he did not even suspect. Who actually has the lead in the latter example?&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>To this end, we will need to accept that certain passengers will not be able to make the trip. That all people are equal is something that we proudly wave about as if Nature cares at all.</p>
<p>This current period, with its anti-evolutionary attitude, near love, of the evolutionarily disadvantaged, will be seen as a backwards religious curiosity in the future. At best. At worst, they will perceive us as criminally pushing for the end of humanity.</p>
<p>A hundred years from now (or less), when nature is drastically outpacing evolution’s ability to adapt, man will no longer have the luxury of hewing to a moral code that forbids genetic engineering of humans.</p>
<p>The blind, the deaf, the unmotivated, the stupid, the weak, the retarded, the severely autistic—anyone who needs the intricate modern support system to survive [1]—they will sink when their survival depends on them swimming. Being saddled with them because of an outdated morality will be a luxury no-one will be able to afford.</p>
<p>It will be seen as far more efficient to tweak genetics to keep members of society within a physical bandwidth that if not of actual use in one way or another, at least imposes a minimum of effort.</p>
<p>We will no longer have the luxury of keeping useless people alive. This is not eugenics; this is a much harsher world than we know. The future will contain a desperation unknown for centuries to the first-world person. Third-world people—¾ of the world—are already intimately familiar with this harsh, cruel algebra.</p>
<p>In Lem&rsquo;s words:</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;If we are to behave like intellectual cowards, we can, of course, remain silent on the topic of any probable future developments. But in that case, we should at least make it clear that we are behaving like cowards. Man cannot change the world without changing himself. We can take the first steps on a given path while pretending we do not know where it leads. Yet this is not the best strategy.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>Lem is capable of describing procreation in the most clinical possible way:</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Fertilization is an act of “taking a molecular decision” in a confrontation between two partly alternative “hypotheses” about a future state of the organism, whereby the gametes of both sexes are “carriers” of those hypotheses.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>He tries again and again to describe just how limited we are relative to our future selves.</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;For someone who can count to a hundred, there is actually no practical difference between a quintillion and infinity. Man as a researcher of the Universe is more like someone who has just learned arithmetic than like a mathematician who is freely juggling infinities.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>He also wonders what we&rsquo;re going to do with ourselves if we do make it past the coming inflection point that will determine whether we have a future.</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;[…] when basic needs are being fully satisfied, the problem “what to do next,” i.e., whether we should create some new needs and, if so, what kind, comes to the fore.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>Finally, just to show that Lem&rsquo;s sometimes too optimistic, we need only turn to his hope for how we will manage information overload.</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;We can even think that presenting banal works will at last be declared a menace and thus will be seen as a violation of scientists’ professional ethics because such works create nothing but “noise” that prevents us from receiving valuable information.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>Oh dear, thank goodness Lem is no longer around to see just how badly we&rsquo;ve disappointed him.</p>
<p>It is not an easy read, but it is legitimately a work of staggering genius. You don&rsquo;t have to agree with him on everything, but you can&rsquo;t argue with his method, with his intellectual rigor and devotion to the scientific method to reduce the ineffability of who we are and where we&rsquo;re headed.</p>
<p>I&rsquo;ve included <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id= 3750">notes, citations and errata</a> in a separate post.</p>
</div></dd>
<dt class="field">Die Menschheit schafft sich ab (2016)</dt>
<dd><div class=" "><p>by <em>Harald Lesch and Klaus Kamphausen</em></p>
<p>This book presents a history of mankind and its efforts that begins in the very early universe and slowly focuses its lens on the modern day. It falls into the category of two other books I&rsquo;ve read this year, <em>Eine Kurze Geschichte der Menschheit</em> and <em>Summa Technologiae</em>. All of these books offer a sweeping look at human and galactic history and scientific knowledge, which serve as a basis for predictions. Harari predicts cybernetics and AI. Lem does as well. Lesch and Kamphausen predict climate catastrophe.</p>
<p>They take us from the Big Bang and the invention of knowledge, the discovery of our planet, continents and then into how the anthropocene has the Earth in its grip.</p>
<p>The authors discuss the conditions and events that led to life on Earth and then the various forms that it took over the eons. They do this in order to juxtapose it against the profound effect that mankind is having on the planet in a comparably ridiculously short amount of time.</p>
<p>While it took hundreds of millions of years for the remains of dinosaurs and plants to turn into pockets of oil and gas in the lithosphere, mankind is now using 1,000,000 years worth of these supplies every year.</p>
<p>Fish of all kinds were five times more abundant as recently as the 1950s and we&rsquo;re taking out twice the replacement rate every year.</p>
<p>We&rsquo;ve killed off almost every creature larger than a cockroach and replaced it with our paltry few domesticated breeds. We burn and burn and burn, emitting far more CO<sub>2</sub> than can be reasonably absorbed by the vegetation that we aren&rsquo;t clear-cutting to make way for monoculture crops.</p>
<p>We&rsquo;re wiping away topsoil in arable lands at prodigious rates.</p>
<p>While the book is quite science-heavy, it&rsquo;s accessible to anyone with a passing interest in the sciences and a modicum of intelligence and willingness to learn. The two authors are both professors and have an entertainingly didactic approach to their material, making sure to define their terms and provide explanation of not-so-common concepts. They definitely make an effort to show just how proven the case is that mankind is doing nearly everything wrong in its approach to using the only home it has. There is no room for doubt that we are driving directly at an immovable wall.</p>
<p>The authors discuss how western civilization—with its amoralism and naked greed and egocentrism—is the main driving force and reason for our predicament. They include a detailed history, with some truly horrific anecdotes:</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Die Neue Welt zählte um 1500 etwa 100 Millionen Menschen, so viele wie die Alte Welt. Innerhalb weniger Jahrzehnte wurden mehr als 90 Millionen Indianer in Nord-, Zentral- und Südamerika von den Krankheitserregern aus dem Abendland dahingerafft, während sich hundert Jahre nach Einführung der Kartoffelknolle die Bevölkerung auf der anderen Seite des Atlantiks verdoppelte. Eine nahrhafte Entwicklungshilfe.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>Before the discovery of the new world, western civilization had already driven itself to the wall once.</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Europa stand Ende des 15. Jahrhunderts unter ökologischen Gesichtspunkten betrachtet an einem Punkt, der mit der heutigen globalen Situation vergleichbar ist. Die Wälder waren fast vernichtet, die meisten Gewässer verschmutzt, die nötigen Rohstoffe so gut with verbraucht, die Nahrung war knapp.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>However, because the population was so much smaller and had not yet industrialized, the damage it did to the planet was limited. It was driving its own extinction, but hadn&rsquo;t yet grown dangerous enough to take the rest of the biosphere with it.</p>
<p>It is very clearly the naked and greed-driven capitalism—a form that ignores costs it incurs (e.g. environmental costs) in order to have more for itself—that is the problem, according to the authors (and, quite frankly, science <em>and</em> common sense):</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Das Eindringen in die Natur der Dinge ist im Anthropozän von herausragender Bedeutung. Aus den technologischen Entwicklungen ergibt sich dann zwangsläufig der Bedarf nach Rohstoffen und Energie. Die sollen natürlich möglichst billig sein, damit die ökonomischen Vorgaben, also die Renditeerwartungen, erfüllt werden können.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>And it&rsquo;s not only other species that suffer and die off in droves under this rapacious system. The system really only &ldquo;works&rdquo; for a very small percentage of humanity itself. That small part holds the rest of the world in thrall, commandeering their meager produce in order to enrich themselves.</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;Wir wissen, die Erde wird nicht wachsen, aber unsere Ansprüche wachsen, – und die Ungerechtigkeit und Ungleichheit wachsen mit.</p>
<p>&ldquo;Müssen wir den Planeten zerstören und andere Menschen in Armut halten, um unser Leben in gewohntem Maß – oder sollte man besser sagen, in gewohnter Maßlosigkeit – fortzuführen?&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote><p>This system has a tremendous number of victims, not only in the rest of the species, but also in humans:</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Der Hunger tötet welt-weit ungefähr 100.000 Menschen täglich. Kaum jemand spricht über diesen Völkermord, von Abhilfe ganz zu schweigen.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>The victims are not only in the present but also in the future. Our desire for &ldquo;freedom&rdquo; uses up resources that are not ours, but that our worldview in no way prevents us from using. We blindly assume that if it has been made available or can be obtained, then it is ours to have.</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Freiheit ist erstens der Kneipenbesuch, und zweitens, dass der Wirt Heizpilze auf den Gehsteig stellt, damit man auch im Januar den Wein und den Barsch draußen genießen kann. Freiheit ist, dass Amerikaner 6,6 Milliarden Kilowattstunden Strom allein für die Weihnachtsbeleuchtung aufwenden, mehr als Tansania im gesamten Jahr verbraucht. Freiheit ist, ein Auto zu bauen (und zu kaufen), das pro Kilometer 224 Gramm Kohlendioxid ausstößt.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Wir leben in einer so unbedingten Freiheit, dass wir der Meinung sind, dass Mobilität gleich Bewegungsfreiheit sei. Egal was es kostet, was es die Natur oder die zukünftigen Generationen kostet—das ist völlig egal. Unsere unbedingte Freiheit steht über allem.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>We are using up these resources at a completely irreplaceable rate:</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Wir sollten uns darüber im Klaren sein, dass die jetzige Form von Mobilität, die diesem unbedingten Freiheitsbegriff unterliegt, zu einem unbedingten Verbrauch führt. Wir haben keine Möglichkeiten dieses Verbrauchte zurückzuholen.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>The solution is obviously to stop doing all of this, but the outlook is bleak.</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Es ist ein bisschen so wie mit dem kategorischen Imperativ. Niemand von uns kann so leben, dass alle seine Handlungen zum allgemeinen Gesetz er hoben werden. Aber er kann sich das Ziel setzen. Er sollte zumindest wissen, wie es richtig wäre und sich daran orientieren.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Scheinbar sind wir auf der Erde in diesem Irrsinn verfangen und als Besitzer solcher Derivate der Meinung: Komm, lass uns doch lieber darauf spekulieren, dass das Ding kaputtgeht. Nur—was machen wir dann? An wen soll die Versicherung auszahlen?&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>They include several essays from other authors about various current topics, like the efficacy of the &ldquo;Energiewende&rdquo; in Germany or the efforts at changing habits and usage in various countries in Europe (though with a focus on Germany).</p>
<p>I&rsquo;ve included <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id= 3787">notes, citations and errata</a> in a separate post.</p>
</div></dd>
<dt class="field">What We Talk about When We Talk about Rape (2018)</dt>
<dd><div class=" "><p>by <em>Sohaila Abdulali</em></p>
<p>While this book offered a few interesting insights (mostly in the conclusion), it was rather thin on the ground with information. While there were a few statistics, many of them were either unsubstantiated or cited shaky sources (AlterNet, Jezebel, etc.) These are not <em>bad</em> sources, per se. They sometimes have quality articles, but they just as often have unhinged screeds that you can&rsquo;t really take seriously. It&rsquo;s unclear which ones she cited—but some of the &ldquo;facts&rdquo; she cited seemed nearly unbelievable (e.g. <span class="quote-inline">&ldquo;In the US, more than ninety percent of people with developmental disabilities are sexually assaulted&rdquo;</span>).</p>
<p>Unfortunately, throughout the book, she devolves to the &ldquo;all women are victims and all men are monsters&rdquo; rhetoric that should be beneath her. She interviews much better than she writes. The book was actually very short and had no central theme or line through it, other than all of the material being more-or-less about rape and its consequences.</p>
<p>Sometimes the switches between chapters was jarring—and often topics that had come up previously were brought back up again later, but without any cohesion. It felt like a scattershot collection of essays and thoughts, with a copious amount of quoted material to fill in what ended up being a short book. The conclusion contained more interesting material, with more cohesiveness and balance, suggesting that the person I&rsquo;d heard interviewed was the same one who&rsquo;d written that material.</p>
<p>While I applaud her for writing a book about rape all over the world, she doesn&rsquo;t properly indicate which country she&rsquo;s talking about when she makes some of her more incendiary statements. For example, earlier in the book, she writes:</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Sexual predators deserve due process, but they don’t deserve blanket immunity from accusations any more than any other criminals.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>Again with the straw man. Even if a lot of people believe this, do you need to spend so much time debunking it? Might as well prove that 2+2=4.</p>
<p>As well, while this might be the case <em>in people&rsquo;s minds</em> in some places in the States, it&rsquo;s not the legal case anywhere.</p>
<p>Boys will be boys is stupid. So is pretending that people aren’t animals who have to be trained to resist biological impulses. Anyone who says they haven’t ever felt a nearly overwhelming biological urge is lying, man or woman. Giving in to it without consent is rape. Controlling it takes training.</p>
<p>Again and again throughout the book she claims that rape is something that happens all the time, but fails to back it up with data from any reliable source. For example, she writes that</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;out of every 1,000 rapes,&rdquo;<ul>
<li>310 are reported to the police;</li>
<li>57 lead to an arrest;</li>
<li>11 get referred to the court system;</li>
<li>6 rapists go to jail.</li></ul></div></blockquote><p>But how do we know that’s abysmal? Are we assuming all 1000 are true? Is she saying that only 0.06% of rapists are punished? As I wrote above, these unsubstantiated &ldquo;facts&rdquo; are just presented as if they don&rsquo;t need any justification, even though the accusation is incredibly monstrous. Abysmal would be false convictions or acquittals of rapists (perversion of justice).</p>
<p>At a few points, she writes that her husband is brilliant, which left me thinking that she should have had him write the book.</p>
<p>After she several times cites that 70-80% of rapes occur in the home or with close relatives, she fills the rest of the book with (possibly apocryphal) stories of rapes outside of the family. They&rsquo;re almost certainly true (hoping she did her research), but they&rsquo;re so over-the-top, they can&rsquo;t represent even the average of the experience for those rapes that do occur outside of the family.</p>
<p>For example,</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Late night/early morning, there was a knock on the passenger window. I looked up and saw that it was my ex. I cracked the door. The next thing I know I’m being dragged out of the car and slammed onto the ground. “There were nine guys. Four I had known. The other five were strangers. One was my best friend’s boyfriend. Some had bats. One had a gun. They kicked me and beat me. They zip-tied me and put me in the trunk. They took me to a basement and took turns raping me.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>Who does this? Madness of the highest order. Who plans this? How do you have nine friends who’ll come along on a gang rape/kidnapping party? I&rsquo;m not doubting it, but it&rsquo;s at the absolute extreme end of sexual assault, to say nothing of harassment. Those that call everything rape would throw this in the same category as unwanted hair-sniffing or shoulder-touching? It&rsquo;s madness, and she offers no guidance.</p>
<p>We’re all trained to just believe everything we hear, but this seems beyond the pale. I know it must happen sometimes, but the story is presented as if this is a risk that faces anyone at any time. Just like the story of Alexa (included in citations below), where she ended up doing tremendous amounts of blow and being passed around her Wall Street–office like a sex toy. This is not a common danger.</p>
<p>To round out the critique with one of the better ideas from the end of the book (even though the grammar is a bit slapdash):</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;[…] if someone forces you to have sex, it is rape. The narrative that says: good girls don’t get raped; bad girls can’t get raped. In either case, the nuns’ infamous Boys are off the hook. We’ve created a narrative that says that either it didn’t happen to you, or you deserved it.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>I&rsquo;ve included <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id= 3788">notes, citations and errata</a> in a separate post.</p>
</div></dd>
<dt class="field">The Man in the High Castle (1962)</dt>
<dd><div class=" "><p>by <em>Philip K. Dick</em></p>
<p>This novel is, in a way, more straightforward than many of Dick&rsquo;s other novels. Instead of multiple onion-skin layers of reality, some drug-induced and (most likely) imaginary (as in <em>The Three Stigmata of Palmer Eldritch</em>), there is one extremely intricately imagined alternate reality where the Axis won World War II, as well as one sketched alternate reality in which they did not, but the Allies converted the world to socialism.</p>
<p>The Reich occupies the east coast of America, all of Europe and much of Russia and Asia, as well as South America. The Japanese have the west coast of America. The middle of America is a no-man&rsquo;s land with few people and no effort made to occupy or suppress it. The Nazis executed a 15-year campaign to exterminate all of the peoples of every African nation.</p>
<p>The British are still around, but largely defanged. China retains a larger sphere of influence, but not nearly as large as Japan. Italy resents its second-class status in the list of conquering nations, but has little power to do anything.</p>
<p>The story takes place largely in San Francisco and in various cities in Colorado. Frank Frink is an artisan who hides his Jewish ancestry. Juliana Frink is his ex-wife, living in the no-man&rsquo;s land with Joe, an Italian-American truck driver with a military past. Childan is an antique dealer with delusions of grandeur and a deeply sycophantic attitude to the occupying Japanese. Wegener is a former German officer posing as a Swede (Baynes). He is trying to communicate with the Japanese in some covert operation.</p>
<p>Joe turns out to be a Wehrmacht spy, and the &ldquo;Swede&rdquo; learns of <em>Operation Dandelion</em> from an elderly Japanese—a plan hatched by the ascendant Goebbels to nuke all of the Japanese Home Islands and to consolidate world power, once and for all.</p>
<p>The majority of the book is about building the world in which these people move, expertly dropping believable and well-integrated information about the alternate history.</p>
<p>Because this is Philip K. Dick, there are two histories: the &ldquo;real&rdquo; one and one in samizdat in the form of a book called the <em>The Grasshopper Lies Heavy</em>, in which the author depicts an alternate history to the &ldquo;real&rdquo; one in which the Allies won—but it&rsquo;s different and more utopian than our own.</p>
<p>That is, the characters in the book live in a world occupied by the Germans and Japanese that functions largely like our world does today —with superpowers exerting what they consider to be largely benevolent but firm influence on occupied nations who should be grateful for the guiding hand of a superior civilization—but they dream through the eyes of a gifted author of a utopia in which socialism has triumphed and put wonderful technological advances to use in bettering all of mankind. That is, instead of the Nazis eradicating every <em>Neger</em> in Africa, the peoples of Africa are lifted up by the same technology.</p>
<p>As ever with Dick, things aren&rsquo;t so straightforward: many of the characters use the <em>I Ching</em> to predict their future—and it works (in this book). Even the author of <em>The Grasshopper Lies Heavy</em> admits that he used the book and the coins to write the book. That is, the book is a &ldquo;prediction&rdquo; of sorts. When Juliana finally confronts the author, they use the coins again to elicit from the inanimate seer that the book is actually <em>the truth</em>, that what is written there is the <em>real</em> world and that they have all been living a sick, hallucinated lie.</p>
<p>Tagomi discovers this on his own, when he takes one of Frink&rsquo;s hand<em>wrought</em> jewelry items to a park and focuses deeply on its <em>wu</em>, its inner essence. When he does, he finds himself transported to another world—the world in the <em>The Grasshopper Lies Heavy</em>. Terrified, he uses the same technique to somehow make his way back.</p>
<p>As always, Dick is a delight to read and provides plenty of food for thought. His stories are incredibly unique and surprising. Highly recommended.</p>
<p>I&rsquo;ve included <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3792">notes, citations and errata</a> in a separate post.</p>
</div></dd>
<dt class="field">Adirondack Characters and Campfire Yarns: Early Settlers and their Traditions (2005)</dt>
<dd><div class=" "><p>by <em>William J. O‘Hern</em></p>
<p>The author many times writes that there are so many tales lost to the mists of time and that one volume doesn&rsquo;t suffice to include many of the tales that are known. I think he is overly enamored by the variety he thinks that he is offering. Many of the stories are very similar and they involve a painstaking protocol of how many animals were killed with how many shots. The stories rarely offer a surprise ending or even much interesting detail. They are just the description of a single everyday incident in an otherwise boring life.</p>
<p>For example:</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;George was a good shot. In fact he was a sharpshooter with either a rifle or a shotgun. Mr. Ralph would tip George $5 for every partridge he shot. Once, George shot a kingfisher with a 30-30 Winchester across the bay near the outlet of Black Creek Lake. The bird was sitting on a large rock. The gun that George used the most was a 30-30 Winchester Carbine.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>This is a very typical passage: drily written, matter-of-fact, and not particularly fascinating.</p>
<p>These men were not stewards of the land. They were unwashed and uneducated hunters who took as much as they possibly could. They laid bold claim to having been the man (because they were all men) to kill the last panther or the last bear. Only much later in the book would there be stories of some who seemed to want to take care of the Adirondacks.</p>
<p>One of the most heralded mountain men was French Louie, a Canuck who&rsquo;d wandered down to the region. He seemed nearly the most savage and unpredictable and just downright stupid-mean. The author claimed again and again that people loved him, but I don&rsquo;t see how.</p>
<p>The author cites how much Louie loved his dogs and how fiercely he would defend them. But the dogs aren&rsquo;t native. They&rsquo;re just barking killing machines that he uses to cull as much meat and pelts from the woods as possible. When the wolves killed one of his dogs, Louie slaughtered the whole pack in revenge—a lesson that could not hope to be learned by a pack with no surviving members. The only purpose was mindless slaughter and petty revenge.</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Elijah Conklin&rsquo;s written recollections record that Louie &ldquo;. . was the one who killed the last of the timber wolves in the Adirondacks. He killed five on Samson Lake. They killed his dog and he put arsenic in a doe&rsquo;s carcass and killed all five.&rdquo;&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>The author very clearly loves everything about the Adirondacks at any time since whites started writing about them. He is over the moon about every detail he can find and wants to preserve every possible word written about any era of trapping, hunting or being in the wild in the Adirondacks.</p>
<p>But the author <em>also</em> venerates the trapper and hunter&rsquo;s <em>right</em> to kill the animals for money. Without fail, he characterizes animals as devious and mean in their hopeless attempts to save their lives from their technologically advanced and pitiless enemy, the Adirondack woodsman. A trap is, by design, a cruel way to kill an animal. It chews its own foot off or dies of exhaustion, starvation or dehydration.</p>
<p>Beyond that, the author also lauds these heroes for avoiding the state authorities who are trying to contain their plunder and who try to make them stick with hunting and trapping methods that are legal and are not on private property. They didn&rsquo;t care and they were heroes for the devious methods with which they eluded the authorities. The park ranger is made out to be a pain in the ass and the criminal eluding him is venerated.</p>
<p>Amongst themselves, there was a pact to keep each other alive—honor among thieves, of a sort—with a sort-of campsite-rule where you were allowed to use cabins that were not yours, but left them as good as or better than your found them.</p>
<p>Besides the animosity between the woodsmen and the rangers, there was the tension between the woodsmen and their customers: &ldquo;sports&rdquo; or city-slickers who couldn&rsquo;t find their asses with both hands and a torch.</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;[…] some of these city dudes that come up here deer hunting and take turns having their pictures taken with a bunch of deer and maybe a bear or two hanging up behind them, never shot a gun in their lives and wouldn&rsquo;t know a turns  skunk from a ten-point buck. They couldn&rsquo;t hit the inside of a barn if you closed the door on them.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>Most of the stories are written by other authors—some of them write much better than O&rsquo;Hern, but none of them write extremely well. The best passages came from the few women included in the volume, to be honest.</p>
<p>I did learn more than I already knew about logging terms and traplines. That was certainly interesting. Most of the stories take place in places that I&rsquo;ve visited—some of them even lived (like Clinton). That certainly made it a more fun read than for someone who has no connection whatsoever to the places. The afterword was nice—a plea for moderns to keep the Adirondacks alive as they are and as they were.</p>
<p>I&rsquo;ve included <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3795">notes, citations and errata</a> in a separate post.</p>
</div></dd>
<dt class="field">Digging Up Mother (2016)</dt>
<dd><div class=" "><p>by <em>Doug Stanhope</em></p>
<p>This is Doug Stanhope&rsquo;s autobiography. It is also a biography of his mother, Bonnie. Until her death, their lives were entwined. Stanhope writes quite well and tells the story of his life—and his Mother&rsquo;s—in a rollicking and well-structured novel.</p>
<p>&ldquo;Mother&rdquo; is a piece of work: she loves her son nearly unconditionally. She is a free spirit who is Doug&rsquo;s best friend for decades. They have the same sense of humor. Bonnie is an actress, a masseuse, a con-woman and Doug&rsquo;s biggest fan no matter what he does. She is also a depressed woman in constant pain, easily addicted to pain medication, though on the AA wagon for most of her life. She is manipulative. She is a hoarder. She is loved by many. She is the life of the party.</p>
<p>Doug Stanhope is a plainspoken, smart, observant comedian with a lot of miles on him. He&rsquo;s spent years on the road, playing every bowling alley, dive bar and roadhouse in every state in the U.S. He&rsquo;s nearly the definition of a functional alcoholic. He doesn&rsquo;t like to be alone and has warmed his bed with many women on the road. He&rsquo;s almost never been single. He loves living communally, nearly constantly living with at least one, if not several people. Even when he lived in a car, he had a roommate. He&rsquo;s had a litany of powerful actresses as long-term girlfriends. He&rsquo;s had many friends, some for decades. He is faithful to them, if not his official girlfriends and lovers. He is now living with the mentally ill Bingo in Bisbee, Arizona.</p>
<p>His life is lived in the seedier part of America—he would call it a more honest life in a more honest place. He&rsquo;s never compromised, though he has worked in Hollywood, trying to make a go of it. Unlike Bill Hicks, he didn&rsquo;t shun the commercial world—though he has retained his honesty and hasn&rsquo;t censored himself at all. His material is highly sexual, highly coarse and uproariously funny. He&rsquo;s funny because he tells the truth. Some of his opinions are a bit too libertarian, but his heart is in the right place. He&rsquo;s quite intelligent and can put long off-the-cuff diatribes together that cut our society deep, to the core, and still be shockingly funny.</p>
<p>Before he was a comedian, he was a telemarketing grifter. With his gift of gab, he was one of the best. Despite having spent most of his life in the grayer areas of the law, he&rsquo;s never been in trouble and never been in prison. He&rsquo;s been in jail, but was always bailed out. He&rsquo;s had TV shows, but he&rsquo;s always loved being a comedian more. He likes airport bars the best—hotel bars, if need be.</p>
<p>As a comedian, he&rsquo;s quite humble, constantly pointing out comedians who are better than he is. He revered Mitch Hedberg. He is now, by definition, better than Hedberg. He&rsquo;s considered to be the best comedian alive by many of the other best comedians. He does not pull punches. You know he won&rsquo;t. He won&rsquo;t sell out.</p>
<p>Some citations to give you some ideas of his thinking and comedy:</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;[…] unlike the Internet, the newspaper eventually ends, so you know to get on with your day.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;A frustrated waitress or store clerk laughing is way more gratifying than a paying audience.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Anyone who says that suicide is never the answer hasn’t heard all of the questions.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;When I say that I wrote Mother off, I don’t mean that I cut off contact or deprived her of any financial support. I was still with her and helped out all I could. The write-off came in that I knew that I could no longer invest myself emotionally in trying to get her to help herself.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>I know this feeling with politics or rational discussions. At some point, with some people, you give up. You achieve detente by implicitly no longer talking about anything but the weather and pets.</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;They sent her ashes back months later. I tried to sell them on eBay, with all proceeds going to The Humane Society but the auction was shut down within hours. Seems selling dead people is not only against eBay policy, it’s against federal law. Feds must not like cats like Mother did.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>I&rsquo;ve included <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3798">notes, citations and errata</a> in a separate post.</p>
</div></dd>
<dt class="field">Le Transperceneige (1982; fr)</dt>
<dd><div class=" "><p>by <em>Jacques Lob and Jean-Marc Rochette</em></p>
<p>This is an older, French, black-and-white graphic novel about a 1,001-car train charging along a track hundreds of thousands of kilometers long, encircling a globe frozen by man&rsquo;s hubris and foolishness. It is the last bastion of humanity, holding the last dregs in its innards. The world is cold because man released a chemical to counteract the effects of his having warmed the climate disastrously. It backfired and froze the world.</p>
<p>There are the &ldquo;queuetards&rdquo; (denizens from the back of the train) and the elites (the front, naturally). Humanity&rsquo;s age-old structure has been compressed into one dimension. We meet two prisoners, one queuetard (Proloff) and one sympathizer for the queuetards (Belleau), from the middle of the train. They are being taken forward from their prison to the state cars, nearer the front. Their journey takes them through the luxury of the vegetable and plant cars, something the queuetard didn&rsquo;t even know existed. He only saw the sun again for the first time in years—because the rear cars have no windows.</p>
<p>Proloff moves forward through the train with Belleau, discovering areas that he&rsquo;s never seen—and eventually moving beyond the cars that even she&rsquo;s seen. They become lovers (of course). They learn that the train is slowing and, that General Krimson (in charge of the military and, de factor, of the train) plans to decouple part of the rear of the train. The military pursues them—ostensibly because they are spreading a virus throughout the train.</p>
<p>Proloff and Belleau make it to the very front of the train, to the locomotive. Here, Proloff shoots out windows, letting in the -87ºC air. Belleau succumbs, but he is rescued by Alex Forrester, the odd and remote engineer of the train. The engineer works with Olga, the AI in the train. Olga can continue to run indefinitely, as long as she is accompanied by a human presence.</p>
<p>The cars are detached, Proloff takes over as engineer—and the virus story turns out to have been true, as he remains the sole passenger of the Transperceneige at the end of the first book.</p>
<p>The second book picks up the story in a second train, larger than the Transperceneige. It runs on the same track and is aware of the other, smaller train. They are in constant fear of a collision and, thus, make frequent &ldquo;braking drills&rdquo; to verify that the train could stop should it be necessary. During this time, the &ldquo;Arpenteurs&rdquo; (surveyors) go out onto the frozen surface to perform various missions. The first depicted mission sees the leader fall, spilling one of his eyes from his frozen head. A young Puig Vallès picks it up—and, seventeen years later, becomes a surveyor himself.</p>
<p>Puig is popular among the masses, as the surveys are one of the only real, physical entertainments—everything else is virtual and available to only a select few (the rich and winners of occasional lotteries). As in the film, the train is separated into the have and have-nots. Puig&rsquo;s popularity is limited to the masses; the leaders seek to get rid of him by sending him on a suicide mission to fly from the train and reconnoiter the track in front. He manages it, as no other before him, and blackmails them into letting him land back on the train. He had discovered a destroyed bridge in front of the train and could help them deviate before a disaster.</p>
<p>Safely back on the train, he discovers further that the Transperceneige is actually no longer circling the globe. That, instead, the very first braking maneuver was not a test of avoiding the other train, but was to stop and pick up the other, smaller train, depositing it into the capacious bowels of several of the thousands of cars in the larger train. Proloff, as the only survivor, continued on his journey, but in a train within a train. Perhaps this is a metaphor for the virtual reality that the denizens of the larger train &ldquo;enjoyed&rdquo;.</p>
<p>The leaders kept this from the general populace, in order to continue to control them with the fear of a collision.</p>
<p>In the third book, Puig is in charge of the larger train. He is now married to Val, the daughter of General Kennel, the new head of the military. There is an accident that forces a braking maneuver. Several cars in the middle of the train are destroyed. Puig dons his surveyor&rsquo;s suit once again to investigate. At the same time, Reverend Dickson dispatches his secret child-assassins in similar suits to kill him while he&rsquo;s outside. The assassins are also to detach the back part of the train, leaving half of the remaining population to die.</p>
<p>Puig survives the assassination attempt, killing the other soldiers and making his way forward to depose an ascendant Dickson and General Kennel. He manages it and encases them in the &ldquo;drawers&rdquo;—morgue-like containers that serve as a prison on the train.</p>
<p>Shortly after, the train&rsquo;s communications system detects music playing from the opposite side of the ocean. Puig must make another decision: to mount the emergency treads on the first 25 train cars and abandon the rest of the train to divert across the ocean and investigate the source of the music.</p>
<p>Meanwhile, the Reverend and Kennel have sweet-talked their way out of prison and have taken over the back of the train again. This time, the back of the train is the wagons of pleasure and decadent restaurants near the former front of the train. As they slowly make their way across the frozen ocean, the Reverend and General start a new mutiny to turn the train around and return to the tracks on the former shore.</p>
<p>At the head of the train, Puig responds by cutting water, power and heat to the mutinous cars. Dickson launches one last-ditch attack from the outside, sending his remaining assassins along the top of the train to command capsule at the front. Puig and his colleagues repel the attack, retaining control of the train. He returns along their route and kills Dickson and Kennel by shooting through the ceiling of their wagon. The train drives on, toward the other shore.</p>
<p>Near the shore, there are frozen waves that threaten to split the train again. Puig once again takes to the sky to perform reconnaissance, confirming that they are very near the shore before nestling back onto the train. A long-dormant but still-active missile battery shatters the middle of the remaining train, forcing another shortening of the train and jettisoning of unneeded material (like Dickson&rsquo;s artwork).</p>
<p>Finally, they alight on the opposite shore, severely shortened but still moving. The signal is much, much stronger and Puig becomes a surveyor once again to investigate the source. It is an automated system, playing music for a long-frozen audience. The whole journey and struggle was for naught.</p>
<p>The story is interesting, well-drawn and offers some insight into man&rsquo;s hubris, with analogies to our current climate predicament. They were unable to snatch their slim hope, either.</p>
<p>I&rsquo;ve included <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3797">notes, citations and errata</a> in a separate post.</p>
</div></dd>
<dt class="field">The Uninhabitable Earth: Life After Warming (2019)</dt>
<dd><div class=" "><p>by <em>David Wallace-Wells</em></p>
<p>As you begin this book, you feel it is <em>either</em> an unhinged leftist diatribe of sour grapes trying to convince the masters of the universe that they should switch to socialism and stop what we&rsquo;re doing because it&rsquo;s <em>unfair</em> to the losers <em>or</em> it&rsquo;s an exceedingly well-written and researched manifesto shrieking at us that the effects of the world we&rsquo;ve had designed and built for us are also that which make it certain that this world will not last.</p>
<p>It is, unfortunately, the latter. The world we&rsquo;ve built has its destruction written into its DNA. It is built on a mountain of checks that we cannot cash.</p>
<p>We are boiling ourselves away from the planet, but other, less-evolved species will probably be OK. Everything we eat, though, will be extinct by our hand long before global warming can finish them off. Fish and wildlife have already experienced their catastrophic near-extinction and that had nothing to do with CO<sub>2</sub> and everything to do with humans.</p>
<p>If humans disappear or are significantly diminished, then other species may have a chance again. The ones we knew—and that we&rsquo;ve nearly eliminated—will die with us, as they used the same ecological niche as we did for their crucible. They are just as sensitive as we are to those changes. Many plants will die, but others won&rsquo;t. Many insects will die, but others will thrive. The story of climate change is the story not of life dying out, but of intelligent life making its home so inhospitable for itself that, in the end, it check-mates itself.</p>
<p>Wallace-Wells is an eloquent teller of this tale of mankind&rsquo;s downfall. In the citations below, you&rsquo;ll find many thoughtful and evocative descriptions that enhance the dry data of our demise. Even when we actually scream from the hilltops, it&rsquo;s ignored, as Wallace-Wells states so eloquently:</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Rhetoric often fails us on climate because the only factually appropriate language is of a kind we’ve been trained, by a buoyant culture of sunny-side-up optimism, to dismiss, categorically, as hyperbole.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>He employs this talent to interpret the data in a way that we can imagine: what does a world of 2ºC (warming over average temperatures before the industrial age) look like? How about 4ºC? Is any of it livable? With the population we have now? Wallace-Wells makes clear that, for the first time in history, mankind&rsquo;s habitable surface area is <em>shrinking</em>.</p>
<p>Don&rsquo;t be fooled, though: He isn&rsquo;t a classic die-hard environmentalist. In fact, he clearly states that,</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;I may be in the minority in feeling that the world could lose much of what we think of as “nature,” as far as I cared, so long as we could go on living as we have in the world left behind.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>I personally feel that this is a reprehensible thing to say, but the author is probably just a city-dweller who doesn&rsquo;t even know what nature is. At any rate, it was a one-off comment that he made before acknowledging that his dream of living on Cybertron is not a reality on Earth.</p>
<p>His thesis statement for the book is basically as follows,</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;We have all already left behind the narrow window of environmental conditions that allowed the human animal to evolve in the first place, but not just evolve—that window has enclosed everything we remember as history, and value as progress, and study as politics. What will it mean to live outside that window, probably quite far outside it? That reckoning is the subject of this book.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>In another example, he savages Bitcoin for using as much power as solar energy has given us total. So much waste, so little time.</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Market forces have delivered cheaper and more widely available green energy, but the same market forces have absorbed those innovations, which is to say profited from them, while continuing to grow emissions.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>Since Bitcoin is eating up the surplus generated by solar, Wallace-Wells explains:</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Solar isn’t eating away at fossil fuel use, in other words, even slowly; it’s just buttressing it. To the market, this is growth; to human civilization, it is almost suicide. We are now burning 80 percent more coal than we were just in the year 2000.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>Wallace-Wells moves on to explain the injustice of <em>how</em> the so-called developed world has built its empire on the backs of the poor: first, exploiting them and their lands to burn the planet and second, to watch as they also bear the (initial) brunt of the chaos their world has wrought.</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;In the postindustrial West, we try not to think about these bargains, which have benefited us so enormously. […] given the devastation that wealth has imposed on the world of natural wonder it conquered and the suffering of those, elsewhere on the planet, left behind in the race to endless material comforts. And asked, functionally, to pay for them.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>The environmental catastrophe hits not just in temperature increase but in drastic reduction of drinking water, crop yields, and an astonishing increase in pollution.</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;But of all urban entitlements, the casual expectation of never-ending drinking water is perhaps the most deeply delusional. It takes quite a lot to bring that water to your sink, your shower, and your toilet.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>He discusses the Syrian &ldquo;civil war&rdquo; as if there had been no goading or machination from self-interested, western powers, exacerbating a climate crisis for which they are largely responsible with fomented warfare intended to consolidate power over more oil-production.</p>
<p>People always talk of terrorism as if it just appears and lashes out when a state fails. The so-called terrorists do not attack indiscriminately. They generally terrorize within their own borders, against occupying powers. No mention of state terror that engenders it all. Or the massive climate costs they incur in doing so. His analysis is weak and incomplete here. It doesn&rsquo;t have to be exhaustive, but he can&rsquo;t just toss out these little sentences to make a vague point that comes to an utterly fallacious conclusion.</p>
<p>The market rules, though. People move to stupid places for stupid, short-sighted, and selfish reasons. Communities respond by attracting and accommodating the wealthy. They bring water to places where the energy investment to do so is many times more than the place from which the water was originally destined.</p>
<p>He goes on to discuss not just the water crisis (saying we would be bad enough off without one, but we definitely have one…and it&rsquo;s going to get worse), but also the air-pollution crisis, which is basically untenable in any of the larger cities in which 70% of the world&rsquo;s population lives. Not only pollution, but also malnutrition, will guarantee that most of the world&rsquo;s human population will be dead weight, incapable of helping us think our way out of this crisis—because the crisis has stifled their mental and physical development.</p>
<p>Even if they were able to think straight, there&rsquo;s nothing to eat, the bugs are dying, the crops are failing and factory-farming is going to collapse under its own weight. </p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Twenty-two percent of the earth’s landmass was altered by humans just between 1992 and 2015. Ninety-six percent of the world’s mammals, by weight, are now humans and their livestock; just four percent are wild.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>No pollinators, no food, no people, so other predictions of growth are strongly countered. Unless mankind flails in a paroxysm of energy use to dwarf all efforts heretofore to try to cover the gap, which will also end things even more quickly than they otherwise would.</p>
<p>Sometimes he presents numbers too drily:</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Compared to the trajectory of economic growth with no climate change, their average projection is for a 23 percent loss in per capita earning globally by the end of this century.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>In this case, he could be somewhat optimistic that at least this will likely lead to less emissions. Naturally, people will suffer and die, but they will do so anyway. At least if they die in the service of a shrinking economy, mankind ends up with less energy use rather than more. It&rsquo;s far from an ideal solution—it&rsquo;s not even a solution, really, at all—but it&rsquo;s not like a tragedy.</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;And to help buffer or offset the impacts, we have no New Deal revival waiting around the corner, no Marshall Plan ready.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>What could we do? Everything we could do involves energy, extraction, and manufacturing. Every move we make to fix the problem likely makes it worse. Use solar to get free energy? Manufacturing panels is counterproductive (although, according to Bill McKibben in <em>Falter</em>, it&rsquo;s gotten much, much better: panels last for 25 years and the energy investment is amortized in 5 years).</p>
<p>It&rsquo;s far too late for nuclear, considering the manufacturing and concrete involved, even if the budgeting and construction fiascoes could be magically bypassed. The nuclear-waste problem is much better than it was: newer reactors are much more efficient and capable of re-burning and -processing much more its own waste. Even current reactors really produce much less waste and pollution than fossil fuels, which are actively killing us by raising temperature, rather than <em>possibly, eventually</em> killing us with radiation sickness. At this point, it&rsquo;s really about triage.</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Hitting four degrees of warming, which lies on the low end of the range of warming implied by our current emissions trajectory, would cut into it by 30 percent or more. This is a trough twice as deep as the deprivations that scarred our grandparents in the 1930s, and which helped produce a wave of fascism, authoritarianism, and genocide.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>Yes, but losing 15% of 1000 is more devastating than 30% of 50,000. They suffered because they were closer to death to begin with. We fall farther, but still land much higher.</p>
<p>He (like Bill McKibben) tears into the Pinker line of reasoning that things, in fact, have been getting better and we should lean back and appreciate all that our system of ruling the world has given us. </p>
<p>Now I finally realize what annoys me so much about Pinker&rsquo;s argument: the rate of progress was unsustainable and unevenly distributed. The blowback when the wave crashes will hit everyone but Pinker and his cohort. It&rsquo;s like a student cramming for a test that won&rsquo;t remember 90%; the current situation incurs unrealistic expectations. Basically, our progress was obtained on credit and the bill is coming due.</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;But we close them off when we say anything about the future being inevitable. What may sound like stoic wisdom is often an alibi for indifference.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>Despite everything Wallace-Wells has written, he dares chastise those who, with clear eyes, don&rsquo;t see much hope. It doesn&rsquo;t mean we stop trying, but roundly &ldquo;Fuck you&rdquo; for calling us indifferent. He knows all that he wrote in this book: it&rsquo;s fucking hopeless. We have not acted. We have instead doubled down. We will not change. Wallace-Wells bred anyway (he has a child) and is now trying to justify it by pretending—despite all the evidence to the contrary that he himself has presented—that it&rsquo;s not hopeless. He knows his child will not really suffer because she is in the elite conquerors most responsible but least affected.</p>
<p>Don&rsquo;t you dare condemn pragmatic realism as indifference, sir. If I fall off a cliff, gravity reigns whether I want it to or not. My inaction is not indifference. It&rsquo;s acceptance. Parents have to spin themselves fairy tales. Don&rsquo;t expect me to buy their self-consoling bullshit.</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;[…] such as the promise that human life will endure, […]&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>It probably will, but in a nearly unrecognizable form. We will be demoted to colonists on our home planet.</p>
<p>He continues digging, addressing the suicidal theory of economics that we&rsquo;ve chosen to honor as the one true God.</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Behavioral economics is unusual as a contrarian intellectual movement in that it overturns beliefs—namely, in the perfectly rational human actor—that perhaps only its proponents ever truly believed, and maybe even only as economics undergraduates.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>But everyone is still trapped by this backward thinking, that <span class="quote-inline">&ldquo;we tend to think of climate as somehow being contained within, or governed by, capitalism. In fact, the opposite: capitalism is endangered by climate.&rdquo;</span></p>
<p>And our stumbling, foolish way of running things isn&rsquo;t nearly efficient enough—not even close. There is no time anymore to let good things happen as a side-effect of a few people making a fuck-ton of money. </p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;It took New York City forty-five years to build three new stops on a single subway line; the threat of catastrophic climate change means we need to entirely rebuild the world’s infrastructure in considerably less time.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>Next up is technological rapturism: people think that they can escape our ruined world by flying to other planets or by uploading themselves into software (though where the energy comes from to keep running that simulation is a thorny problem).</p>
<p>This is all bullshit, though. We know what we have to do. Eat the rich.</p>
<p>As Wallace-Wells writes,</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;If the world’s most conspicuous emitters, the top 10 percent, reduced their emissions to only the E.U. average, total global emissions would fall by 35 percent.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;United States and Europe, where emissions have already flattened out and will likely begin their decline soon—though how dramatic a decline, and how soon, is very much up in the air.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>Here he conveniently forgets the matter of justice and the fact that the US has &ldquo;flattened out&rdquo; at 2.25 times Europe, which is at 2 times China. There&rsquo;s a lot of savings to be had by reducing them. The prior quote that says that reducing the worst 10% to EU levels would reduce the burden by 35% applies to mostly UAE and US citizens. This is also ignoring the fact that European and U.S. lifestyles are buttressed by industry in China. You can&rsquo;t just offload your carbon emissions by killing your own manufacturing but still increasing consumption. They&rsquo;re still technically your carbon emissions if your consumption is the only thing driving that production.</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;[…] a large slice of China’s emissions is produced manufacturing goods to be consumed by Americans and Europeans.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>He argues that we need to <span class="quote-inline">&ldquo;shake the casual sense that as time marches forward, life improves ineluctably&rdquo;</span>, but this is an elite opinion anyway. Most haven&rsquo;t felt and don&rsquo;t feel these effects anyway. It was always a myth for 95% of humanity.</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;[…] warming at the level necessary to fully melt ice sheets and glaciers and elevate sea level by several hundred feet promises to initiate rolling, radically transformative changes on a timescale measured not in decades or centuries or even millennia, but in the millions of years.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>On that scale, our cradle environment, what we cherish, will be long gone. Even the memory of it will be long gone. By the time the planet is once again able to offer conditions similar to those of fifty years ago, mankind will no longer be interested or will fight it.</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;As Swedish journalist Torill Kornfeldt asks […] “Why should nature as it is now be of any greater value than the natural world of 10,000 years ago, or the species that will exist 10,000 years from now?”&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>Good question, in absolute terms. However, its value to us, now, is much higher, as we are stuck at one point on time&rsquo;s arrow. Perhaps we sacrifice now so that 10,000 years from now is nicer, but we&rsquo;re not doing that either.</p>
<p>In the end, though, there is no more discussion needed.</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;[…] the world has, at most, about three decades to completely decarbonize before truly devastating climate horrors begin. You can’t halfway your way to a solution to a crisis this large.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>We have to abandon everything we know about capitalism as we do it today. It is a crooked kleptocracy that only ever threw enough crumbs to keep its subjects from rising up. As summarized by George Orwell in The Road to Wigan Pier:</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The world is a raft sailing through space with, potentially, plenty of provisions for everybody; the idea that we must all cooperate and see to it that everyone does his fair share of the work and gets his fair share of the provisions seems so blatantly obvious that one would say that no one could possibly fail to accept it unless he had some corrupt motive for clinging to the present system.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>I&rsquo;ve included <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3796">notes, citations and errata</a> in a separate post.</p>
</div></dd>
<dt class="field">Falter  (2019)</dt>
<dd><div class=" "><p>by <em>Bill McKibben</em></p>
<p>I read this book immediately after having read <em>The Uninhabitable Earth: Life After Warming</em> by <em>David Wallace-Wells</em>. It compares favorably: the prose is easily as appealing, the facts just as eye-opening (many overlap, of course) and the conclusion just a bit more hopeful, in a very specific way.</p>
<p>It&rsquo;s not a false hope, either. McKibben is deadly serious about the facts and their sobering implications. But he also spends a little time being in awe of what mankind has produced, despite how casually we&rsquo;ve burned through resources—or how unevenly we&rsquo;ve distributed benefits—to do so.</p>
<p>He doesn&rsquo;t rubber-stamp these achievements as &ldquo;worth it&rdquo; like so many others (just because he happens to be a in a group that benefits) and he doesn&rsquo;t diminish the evil that was an intrinsic part of how it came to be, but he does take a few minutes to describe it, if only to descry something worth saving. If mankind where to have wasted resources on only a handful of people while subjugating all others to produce total and useless crap, then a logical conclusion would be relatively easy: let it all go. We&rsquo;re done here.</p>
<p>Even more than Wallace-Wells, McKibben points the accusatory finger at a system heavily influenced by the so-called American way of life, represented more recently by high-tech moguls and gurus who own vast swaths of the global economy and are no longer located exclusively in America (though many are in Silicon Valley).</p>
<p>He eloquently describes moments from his many travels. Instead of using numbers describing the tar-sands complex in Alberta, he tells us that <span class="quote-inline">&ldquo;[b]ecause any bird that landed on the filthy water would die, cannons fire day and night to scare them away&rdquo;</span>, which cuts much, much deeper with its layered perversity. Or analogizing that <span class="quote-inline">&ldquo;[t]he extra heat that we trap near the planet because of the carbon dioxide we’ve spewed is equivalent to the heat from 400,000 Hiroshima-sized bombs every day, or four each second.&rdquo;</span> Those facts sink in and don&rsquo;t let go.</p>
<p>As with anyone attempting to inspire action, you have to make a decision on how to deliver the message: do you appeal to basic ethics or decency? Or do you appeal to personal danger?</p>
<p>Anyone arguing against going to war in a foreign country (like Iran) generally skips the first argument, though it&rsquo;s the only one they should have to make. Instead, they end up talking about how hard it would be to defeat Iran, how much it would cost in lives and money and so on. The basic senselessness and immorality of it are quickly deemed as moot because people just don&rsquo;t care.</p>
<p>McKibben must strike a similar balance: he spends a little time discussing just how wrong it is for 1% of the planet&rsquo;s population to doom the other 99% for its own pleasure. But then he switches to the argument that is far more likely to hit home for those 1%: that they won&rsquo;t be safe where they are for much longer. The effects of their behavior will soon affect them and the ones they love <em>in addition to</em> faceless and sub-human foreigners in dusty, squalid countries.</p>
<p>As does Wallace-Wells, McKibben discusses the shape of the global economy and the vast reductions or changes needed in order to combat the climate crisis. Unlike either of those authors, though, I think we should welcome a wholesale reduction of mankind (perhaps back to the population level the world enjoyed when I was born, about 4 billion). We can either do it voluntarily or let Mother Nature kill off slews that can no longer be sustained on a dying planet, watching our unthinking and unquestioning brethren grunt and breed and churn their offspring directly into the meat-grinder of an uncaring climate.</p>
<p>Unique among every other generation of mankind that came before us, we will have the dubious honor of knowing that <span class="quote-inline">&ldquo;the size of the board on which we’re playing the game is going to get considerably smaller […]&rdquo;</span> Given this glaring and undeniable fact, we should really get squared with the notion that we can&rsquo;t defend everywhere, we can&rsquo;t save everything and we shouldn&rsquo;t try.</p>
<p>It&rsquo;s not a matter of money, but a matter of remaining resources. And I don&rsquo;t mean we let people fry where they live; instead, as with cases of eminent domain, we should offer them a luxurious apology package to relocate while we focus our efforts on making wherever we relocate them safe from further climate-based predations. This obviously won&rsquo;t happen, but it would be the right thing to do. We&rsquo;ve grown used to getting what we want, to growing without restriction, and to not having to pay too much for our mistakes.</p>
<p>I fault McKibben in only a few places. One of them is in his treatment of Obama, where he writes,</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;It’s not, at some level, Obama’s fault. He was elected to run a political and economic system based on endless growth. He feared that if he upset it too much he wouldn’t be reelected, which would have done no one any good.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>That&rsquo;s a fucking copout. Obama didn’t get it, and he still doesn’t. He&rsquo;s seen all of the data and he doesn’t care. He should have talked about nothing but climate change. He never mentioned it. He had the chance to rebuild the economy better. He put it back the way it was, but more unequal and more zombified. He didn&rsquo;t even stand up once, not where he would have personally sacrificed something.</p>
<p>Similarly for bloody Trudeau of Canada, who&rsquo;s also lying about caring about climate change. He’s a sociopath like all the rest. He and Obama should not go down in history as climate-change leaders who mysteriously took their countries in the exact opposite direction, despite their best intentions. That’s fatuous bullshit.</p>
<p>But otherwise McKibben savages the right people for the climate crisis, placing blame but also obligation to do something about it on the 1% that benefitted the most. He has a long section on the ideological underpinnings of the 20th century that led to this situation, in particular noting the insidious influence of Ayn Rand&rsquo;s writings (who <span class="quote-inline">&ldquo;might as well have written with a crayon&rdquo;</span>) on the idiotic American Business upper class. After reading through this, I was struck by the thought that Rand may have been the Soviet Union&rsquo;s greatest sleeper agent—talk about playing a long game.</p>
<p>Speaking of the Soviet Union, McKibben lashes out at a country with,</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;[…] its environment wrecked because people couldn’t protest pollution, its people demoralized because they were told what to do with their lives, its official art and literature a dim-witted joke.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>Are you hearing the irony in that statement, Bill? No? A pity. I suppose you are, after all, an American. As he mentioned earlier in the book,</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;[his] naïveté stemmed naturally from the fact that [he] grew up at precisely the moment when America was making huge strides toward reducing inequality, when it seemed that the obvious task was to make our world fairer. I was born in 1960, between the New Deal and the Great Society.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>I guess the whole cold-war mindset was buried a bit too deeply, as well. There are other examples, in quick succession. In another story that immediately followed, he was outside the GUM department store in Moscow where he saw,</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;[…] two long lines of people waiting, […] When the left door opened first, everyone on the right side simply went home: they’d guessed wrong and knew that whatever was for sale would be long gone before they made it inside.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>You have described an Apple store, Bill. You have not in any way described a uniquely Soviet failing. He still wasn&rsquo;t done, though,</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;An industrial society that can’t produce enough children’s coats for the Russian winter—that’s failure on a grand scale.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>His analysis seems to be entirely without self-reflection or ironic sense. He delivers these anecdotes complete devoid of any analysis of the economic war waged on the USSR by a rapacious, pitiless, and amoral power (the U.S.). He utterly fails to not even mention the same, or worse, level of failure in America since Reagan. The depth of anti-communism and Russophobia in the U.S. is so staggering that it rears its ugly head even in the most otherwise carefully researched book.</p>
<p>Finishing up with Rand, he discusses the central tenet of <em>Atlas Shrugged</em>—which so many of America&rsquo;s political leaders have taken to heart—that the smart and strong will always have to put up with moochers. The reason it&rsquo;s so appealing is that it&rsquo;s not wrong. There <em>are</em> moochers. There are nearly utterly useless people, unsuited to not only the purpose for which they are employed or invest themselves, but for anything. Dumb, lazy, bored, depressed, untrainable: it doesn’t matter; someone else has to cover for their needs.</p>
<p>The conceit lies in the idea that the dividing line between the groups of productive and unproductive runs right along rich/poor (or black/white or whatever). The problem with Rand&rsquo;s philosophy is that it doesn&rsquo;t account for good or bad luck or drastically staggered starting blocks. It doesn&rsquo;t account for moochers who were &ldquo;born on third and think they hit a triple.&rdquo;</p>
<p>The true moochers are ladder-climbers, middle management and greedy bosses, sitting on the necks of the productive, bleeding them dry. Those with ability should be looking <em>up</em> for moochers, not down, as Rand instructed them.</p>
<p>McKibben sums up how this whole philosophy relates to climate change.</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Once the Arctic melts, there’s no way to freeze it back up again, not in human time. The particular politics of one country for one fifty-year period will have rewritten the geological history of the earth, and crimped the human game.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>In a dark mood, it might strike one as a delicious irony that humanity will have been killed by a parasitic meme—a parasite so stupid that it kills its host. A poisonous and selfish worldview leads to rapacious and immoral individualism leads to lying about climate change to protect business leads to inundation and extinction. Well done. With a whimper indeed. Humanity gets a fucking Darwin Award.</p>
<p>The next section of the book gets more optimistic, discussing germ-line editing and cybernetics. I&rsquo;m not convinced that&rsquo;s going to help. But it&rsquo;s not like we&rsquo;re going to stop breeding, because that’s obviously not an option. Instead, we&rsquo;re totally going to let the rich edit germlines, so even more people can viably breed.</p>
<p>He even gets to Stephen Pinker (who Wallace-Wells also discussed), who he cites as writing that artificial intelligence is <span class="quote-inline">&ldquo;like any other technology […] tested before it is implemented and constantly tweaked for safety and efficacy.&rdquo;</span> Sweet God, the naiveté. It&rsquo;s like he doesn&rsquo;t even live on the same planet. That is absolutely the <em>opposite</em> of how we introduce technology. We have much more of a &ldquo;throw shit on the wall and see what sticks&rdquo; approach, which is marvelously suited to AI—which may end up sticking very well, indeed, whether we like it or not.</p>
<p>After Pinker, cue Kurzweil, who McKibben knows and who he cites about death, <span class="quote-inline">&ldquo;If someone dies, our immediate reaction—it’s considered a tragic thing, not a triumphant thing.&rdquo;</span> I think this infantile, stunted and uniquely western philosophy is fucking ruining everything again by inventing and promulgating so-called needs. A life well-lived can absolutely be triumphant. Lingering on is embarrassing. Kurzweil and his ilk suffer from a surfeit of ego. I’m happy as I am. What&rsquo;s the point of starting over again later, almost certainly completely unadapted for my new life? To whose benefit? Let it go, Ray. Life mattered and matters little, even the first time through.</p>
<p>However, I don&rsquo;t agree with the critique that Kurzweil&rsquo;s philosophy is bad because it <span class="quote-inline">&ldquo;limit[s] new entrants to the human race&rdquo;</span>. I don’t share McKibben’s and society’s seeming preference for the young or unborn. How is a philosophy that favors future generations morally better ? If people become immortal, then we either need a lot more room or we need fewer entrants. It’s logic. We need fewer entrants as well if resources dwindle, as they will.</p>
<p>He finally gets to his pièce de resistance: the solar-power market, which he manages to finally put into terms that look quite hopeful, even to me. Here&rsquo;s the money shot:</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The manufacturing process for solar panels has become so efficient that the panels pay back the energy used to make them in less than four years. Since they last three decades, that means a quarter-century of pollution-free operation.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>Will we be allowed to have this thing? Not if the powers-that-be have anything to say about it. They all benefit from sunken investments in infrastructure—subsidies over nearly a century of decades—that continue today. They&rsquo;re lying about catastrophic downsides to their own energy sources and torpedoing alternatives that are not personally lucrative but would be better for everyone else.</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;That’s why Exxon hates solar: you put up a solar panel and the energy comes for free, which to the corporate mind is the stupidest business plan ever.) The cash you spend for energy stays close to home; there’s no way for the Koch brothers to become our richest and most powerful citizens simply by shipping fuel hither and yon.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>With all of this tech talk, McKibben returns to asking whether we&rsquo;re not already good enough, circling back to the initial theme of asking what is uniquely worth saving about humanity? He discusses resistance and never giving up, even in the face of horrible odds. He wonders again whether we shouldn&rsquo;t just be happy with what we&rsquo;ve got, <span class="quote-inline">&ldquo;Given that there’s no finishing line to the human game, no obvious goal toward which we are racing, then why exactly are we so intent on constantly speeding up?&rdquo;</span></p>
<p>I think it&rsquo;s an important book that asks the right questions and delivers a tremendous amount of vital information in an interesting, well-written and, at times, poignant read. He strikes the right balance between science and philosophy—because it&rsquo;s the deficit of the latter that aided the former in running roughshod over us all. I&rsquo;ll let McKibben have his eloquent last word.</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;But if the bird’s special gift is flight, ours is the possibility of restraint. We’re the only creature who can decide not to do something we’re capable of doing. That’s our superpower, even if we exercise it too rarely.</p>
<p>&ldquo;So, yes, we can wreck the Earth as we’ve known it, killing vast numbers of ourselves and wiping out entire swaths of other life—in fact, as we’ve seen, we’re doing that right now. But we can also not do that.&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote><p>I&rsquo;ve included <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3789">notes, citations and errata</a> in a separate post.</p>
</div></dd>
<dt class="field">Hate Inc. (2019)</dt>
<dd><div class=" "><p>by <em>Matt Taibbi</em></p>
<p>This book was published in serial form over the course of a year. I purchased a subscription at the very beginning and read the chapters as Taibbi produced them. Because of the serial nature, I&rsquo;ve linked the original URLs (to which you only have access if you either have a subscription or if Taibbi just opens it up for everyone) and denoted which citations come from which chapters. I think I have the chapters in the right order.</p>
<p>It was an interesting experiment for an excellent book. I&rsquo;ve still got a subscription to Taibbi&rsquo;s output, but he hasn&rsquo;t published anything since he finished this book. No regrets.</p>
<p>The book is about the American media over the last four decades, but focusing on the first two decades of the 21st century. It&rsquo;s about the influence, the stupidity, the corruption and the sheer uselessness of it all. One of the main thrusts is of the major failures they have suffered in being utterly unable to reliably report on major issues, either before they happen or, even more embarrassingly, afterward.</p>
<p>This is a recurring feature of American media:</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;[…] you can be fired for being wrong. You just can’t be fired for being wrong in concert. […] many of America’s highest-profile media figures are not only wrong very frequently, but absurdly so. But their saving grace is that the wrong things they express are the same wrong things everyone else is expressing.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>Taibbi&rsquo;s accurate descriptions, drawn from the actual pages of America&rsquo;s major newspapers, read like Orwell&rsquo;s 1984. This kind of comparison is considered, in some circles, to be too trite to make, but <em>look at it</em>,</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;In the blink of an eye, we went from tolerating Saddam Hussein without any trouble at all to needing to kill him immediately in self defense […]&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>That is nothing if not a paraphrase for &ldquo;We have always been at war with Eastasia.&rdquo;</p>
<p>This style leads inevitably to the lowest-common-denominator of media: making dumbasses feel superior by showing them even dumber people. In one way, Taibbi&rsquo;s book is a thesis proving that Judge&rsquo;s <em>Idiocracy</em> was a vision of the future that has come much, much more quickly than 500 years.</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The most popular programs aren’t about geniuses and paragons of virtue, but instead about terrible parents, morons, people too fat to notice they’re pregnant, people willing to be filmed getting ass tucks, spoiled rich people, and other freaks. Why use the most advanced communications technology in history to teach people basic geography, or how World Bank structural adjustment lending works, when you can instead watch idiots drink donkey semen for money? […] <strong>We’re probably just a few years way from a show called, <em>What Would You Suck For a Dollar</em>?</strong> (Emphasis added.)&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>Russiagate is a special target for Taibbi: he deems it even stupider than the WMD catastrophe that led to the Iraq war. He is careful to note that the <em>effects</em> of lying about WMD were much worse, but that the sheer <em>stupidity</em> required to promulgate Russophobia was much greater.</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Few think about this, but the press routinely puts the names and personal information of people arrested in newspapers, on TV, and, worst of all, online, where the stories live forever. Yet these people have not been convicted of crimes, merely arrested or charged. <strong>With Russiagate the national press abandoned any pretense that there’s a difference between indictment and conviction.</strong> (Emphasis added.)&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>The media does whatever it can to (A) protect itself while it (B) makes as much money as it can regardless of (C) who gets hurt or (D) whether any of it is true.<br>
The news cycle is like the weekly confession: the next week&rsquo;s news washes away the sins and transgressions of the previous. Hell, for the right sponsors, the media even sells indulgences. Worst of all, though, they <em>buy the myth</em> just because the powers-that-be give them a taste of power, of wealth. Journalism used to be full of the working class; now, it&rsquo;s a bunch of millionaires.</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;When we deride journalists as stenographers, it’s not about them repeating the words of powerful officials. The real crime is absorbing the ideas of powerful people (often crafted by groups of officials in a dreary corporate process) and repeating them as if they’re your own personal thoughts.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>Taibbi&rsquo;s anger is palpable, his research is impeccable, his bona fides are unimpeachable and his writing style is very entertaining. His conclusions are sobering for the American experiment: unless the media can do any part of the job that it used to have, America is doomed. Too many people are already getting the majority of their information about the world—I hesitate to call it &ldquo;news&rdquo;—from compromised sources that have no intention of doing anything but telling them a story focused on keeping them consuming, working a dead-end job and not asking any questions about how anything works and why everything seems to suck for them.</p>
<p>I&rsquo;ve included <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3813">notes, citations and errata</a> in a separate post.</p>
</div></dd>
<dt class="field">Laudatio Si&rsquo;  (2015)</dt>
<dd><div class=" "><p>by <em>Pope Francis</em></p>
<p>This is the papal encyclical written by Pope Francis in 2015. It is relatively well-known and -cited in climate-change circles. It&rsquo;s extremely well-edited and much more on point with current issues than many would credit the church. I think it&rsquo;s best to (mostly) let Francis speak for himself.</p>
<p>The whole essay is worth a read (except for some long stretches of heavily religious babble—there&rsquo;s really no other word for it). While at times he presents very relevant scripture to counter arguments made by those erroneously quoting the Bible, at other times the document drags on considerably with page after page of seemingly unrelated and vaguely recruiting-oriented prose. Am I being unfair? You be the judge:</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Saint Bonaventure went so far as to say that human beings, before sin, were able to see how each creature “testifies that God is three”. The reflection of the Trinity was there to be recognized in nature “when that book was open to man and our eyes had not yet become darkened”.[170] The Franciscan saint teaches us that each creature bears in itself a specifically Trinitarian structure, so real that it could be readily contemplated if only the human gaze were not so partial, dark and fragile. In this way, he points out to us the challenge of trying to read reality in a Trinitarian key.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>This reads like something from any of Umberto Eco&rsquo;s masterpieces. I laud Francis for his effort. I don&rsquo;t think that was the point, though. Where Eco was being deliberately obtuse to demonstrate the impenetrability and non-disprovability of conspiracy/quasi-religious texts, I&rsquo;m afraid Francis isn&rsquo;t kidding. There were several dozen more chapters/paragraphs that were nothing but biblical babble in a similar vein.</p>
<p>Happily, at other times, he&rsquo;s often downright rational and scientific:</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Although change is part of the working of complex systems, the speed with which human activity has developed contrasts with the naturally slow pace of biological evolution. Moreover, the goals of this rapid and constant change are not necessarily geared to the common good or to integral and sustainable human development.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>He continues with a discussion of climate science and underlying economic models, as well as discussing the need for a <span class="quote-inline">&ldquo;circular economy&rdquo;</span>, which will enable us to live indefinitely and harmoniously on the planet, instead of rapaciously and terminally. In particular, he singles out <em>consumption</em> as the root of all evil.</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;We all know that it is not possible to sustain the present level of consumption in developed countries and wealthier sectors of society, where the habit of wasting and discarding has reached unprecedented levels. The exploitation of the planet has already exceeded acceptable limits and we still have not solved the problem of poverty.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>Basically, the Pope is disappointed with how the world works and thinks it should work significantly differently, from the bottom up. In particular, he dismisses the supposition that technology will save us—because technology is wielded by people and people have their own agenda. If their agenda is not aligned, then the technology will harm, not help.</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;[…] We have to accept that technological products are not neutral, for they create a framework which ends up conditioning lifestyles and shaping social possibilities along the lines dictated by the interests of certain powerful groups. Decisions which may seem purely instrumental are in reality decisions about the kind of society we want to build.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>It really seems (unsurprisingly, if you&rsquo;ve read the right bits of the Bible) that the Pope is a socialist, if not a communist.</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;To ensure economic freedom from which all can effectively benefit, restraints occasionally have to be imposed on those possessing greater resources and financial power.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>Here he is again, lashing out agains the consumption-based society (not just economy).</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;This paradigm leads people to believe that they are free as long as they have the supposed freedom to consume. But those really free are the minority who wield economic and financial power.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>At times, it&rsquo;s unclear whether he&rsquo;s voicing a deliberately naive opinion to demonstrate how ridiculous it is that we consider it naive, but sometimes the prose smacks of a complete inability to see the banal evil present in nearly everyone. For example, he poses the following question:</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;What would induce anyone, at this stage, to hold on to power only to be remembered for their inability to take action when it was urgent and necessary to do so?&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>If not rhetorical, then here&rsquo;s a shot at an answer: Because, in our world, there are never any negative repercussions, excuses are always accepted, idiocy is promoted and evil is left to live out its days in luxury. Does that help?</p>
<p>He does seem to understand, though, because at another point, he castigates the first world and its power brokers (which includes pretty much everyone in the 1%):</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;This is due partly to the fact that many professionals, opinion makers, communications media and centres of power, being located in affluent urban areas, are far removed from the poor, with little direct contact with their problems. They live and reason from the comfortable position of a high level of development and a quality of life well beyond the reach of the majority of the world’s population.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>He reserves his sternest worlds for baseless financialization and profit:</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;[…] economic powers continue to justify the current global system where priority tends to be given to speculation and the pursuit of financial gain.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>And then there&rsquo;s the utterly broken political system that is led by the nose by the underlying economics (it should be the other way around).</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;178. A politics concerned with immediate results, supported by consumerist sectors of the population, is driven to produce short-term growth. In response to electoral interests, governments are reluctant to upset the public with measures which could affect the level of consumption or create risks for foreign investment.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>And he&rsquo;s not done with the first world. He takes on the argument posed by some (many) that we need to reduce population. While this would undoubtedly help, those suggesting that we reduce imply heavily that we need to get rid of the third world and their pesky proclivity for procreative promulgation—to the point of overflowing their lands and then invading our own holy borders with waves of skilled immigrants.</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;To blame population growth instead of extreme and selective consumerism on the part of some, is one way of refusing to face the issues. It is an attempt to legitimize the present model of distribution, where a minority believes that it has the right to consume in a way which can never be universalized, since the planet could not even contain the waste products of such consumption.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>The Pope will also not stop peppering this document with relatively bold and non-nuanced opinions on the basic evil of abortion.</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;“The Lord created medicines out of the earth, and a sensible man will not despise them”&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>Like RU486? Sick burn ammirite?</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;There is a tendency to justify transgressing all boundaries when experimentation is carried out on living human embryos.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>We&rsquo;d almost forgotten where you stand there. </p>
<p>That ship has sailed, Francis; are you sure you want to die on that hill? He keeps hammering that point until I fear he may drive away potential allies. Instead, he should think of the actually living instead of worrying about edge cases. Not to mention that voluntary non-breeding in the developed world would go a significant way toward reducing carbon-production.</p>
<p>Does he have any concrete advice (other than to absolutely never have an abortion)? Yes, he does.</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;A person who could afford to spend and consume more but regularly uses less heating and wears warmer clothes, shows the kind of convictions and attitudes which help to protect the environment.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>Hooray! A few of us are doing that already. It&rsquo;s nice to see that the Pope thinks we&rsquo;re doing God&rsquo;s work.</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;If someone has not learned to stop and admire something beautiful, we should not be surprised if he or she treats everything as an object to be used and abused without scruple. <strong>If we want to bring about deep change, we need to realize that certain mindsets really do influence our behaviour.</strong>&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>Basically, we need to change everything about what it means to be a human in the Anthropocene. He&rsquo;s right, but it&rsquo;s pretty much hopeless. Still, I&rsquo;m glad I read it. It&rsquo;s almost as good as <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3538">Industrial Society and its Future</a>.</p>
<p>I&rsquo;ve included <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3830">notes, citations and errata</a> in a separate post.</p>
</div></dd>
<dt class="field">Does anyone have the right to sex? (2018)</dt>
<dd><div class=" "><p>by <em>Amia Srinivasan</em></p>
<p>This is a medium-length essay/tract that was recommended as insightful, but fell rather short. It starts off discussing the notion of the incel community as a powder keg that is a danger to society because of its expectation of sex from the &ldquo;hottest&rdquo; members.  This is already more than a bit of straw man based on the whackiest members of the group.</p>
<p>This tack is based on taking the reasoning of one or two mentally ill people seriously and literally. When someone says he killed a bunch of co-eds because his Satan controlling his dog told him to, we don&rsquo;t infer a whole dangerous movement—we just figure that person is mentally ill. But if the same person claims it&rsquo;s because those hot bitches wouldn&rsquo;t blow him, then we infer a vast underground movement that lurks beneath society.</p>
<p>There were some limpid bits in the essay but it was otherwise all over the place (in a way very similar to Abdulali&rsquo;s <em>What We Talk about When We Talk about Rape</em>). It takes and runs with stereotypes inculcated and revered by … the media? Porn? Hollywood? and applies them broadly to an entire gender. There isn&rsquo;t really any insight or unpacking of societal reasons.</p>
<p>For example: The author states that <span class="quote-inline">&ldquo;sexy schoolgirls and sexy teachers, manic pixie dreamgirls and Milfs, [are] all taut-bodied and hot, minor variations&rdquo;</span> but that they can&rsquo;t <span class="quote-inline">&ldquo;imagine GQ carrying an article celebrating ‘mom bod’&rdquo;</span>. Aren&rsquo;t there several categories of porn that cater exactly to this? Just because a staid and establishment magazine like GQ wouldn&rsquo;t acknowledge it doesn&rsquo;t mean that society as a whole hasn&rsquo;t acknowledged it. If you read the yearly statistical roundup blog from any of the big porn sites, you&rsquo;ll see that actual (not mainstream media) preferences are much more equitable.</p>
<p>It is at this point that I would have expected a discussion of the separation between &ldquo;official culture&rdquo; and &ldquo;actual culture&rdquo;, where the official version is a fake version imposed from above as brainwashing. Nothing of the kind happens. Instead, there seems to be an argument that anyone who withholds their attraction from anyone who wants it is vaguely or even manifestly discriminatory. It&rsquo;s almost as if the author ends up making the incel argument?</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Consider the supreme fuckability of ‘hot blonde sluts’ and East Asian women, the comparative unfuckability of black women and Asian men, the fetishisation and fear of black male sexuality, the sexual disgust expressed towards disabled, trans and fat bodies.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>The tone is clear: all of this is bad. However, there are different reasons for all of it, aren&rsquo;t there? To redefine &ldquo;lack of interest&rdquo; on the part of most people as &ldquo;sexual disgust&rdquo; is disingenuous, at best. This is again defining the whole world in terms of what it wants to fuck, as if that&rsquo;s all anyone thinks about all day. While it may be true for some people, especially during certain phases of their lives, the tone in this essay distorts the world to define it purely in terms of sexual preference and inculcated attraction—and expectation.</p>
<p>That asian men and black women are unfuckable or that black men are dangerous predators has a lot more to do with American society than anything else. That is not really discussed much at all. That people are generally not turned on by disabled or fat bodies is at least partly biological, as is being attracted to people with whom you can procreate. It&rsquo;s almost as if you need to want to fuck someone in order not discriminate against them. But if you do want to fuck them, then you&rsquo;re discriminating against them by defining them purely as sexual beings. So, damned if you, damned if you don&rsquo;t. That&rsquo;s not an interesting or productive line of reasoning.</p>
<p>To prove that I&rsquo;m not unfairly paraphrasing, a direct citation:</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;In other words, the sex-positive gaze risks covering not only for misogyny, but for racism, ableism, transphobia, and every other oppressive system that makes its way into the bedroom through <strong>the seemingly innocuous mechanism of ‘personal preference’.</strong> (Emphasis added.)&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>Try teasing that statement apart. Am I hiding a palette of discriminatory beliefs behind the facade of nearly lifelong monogamy? Nice excuse, right? No wonder more and more people would rather identify as asexual than risk being called racist for what they mistook as biological apathy.</p>
<p>I understand that society has a lot to do with shaping personal preference, but so does biology. It&rsquo;s a ludicrous leap, though, to put the words into scare quotes and then call it &ldquo;seemingly innocuous&rdquo;, suggesting that anyone who is attracted to people that they feel instinctively attracted to is a Neanderthal without scruple or interest in advancing any social agendas. </p>
<p>But them Srinivasan double down and writes the following:</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;It’s because straight people – or, I should say, white, able-bodied cis straight people – aren’t much in the habit of thinking there’s anything wrong with how they have sex.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>Are you fucking kidding me? Straight sex isn’t freighted with judgment or confusion? I’m not in the dating scene and even I know that’s not true. Because…every movie ever. Have you ever seen a movie? Have you every interacted with modern culture? The majority of popular culture is about how white, able-bodied, cis, straight people being supremely uncomfortable about sex. They can&rsquo;t fucking stop talking about it or making movies and songs about it.</p>
<p>My impression is that we started with the thesis that so-called incels are wrong for thinking that anyone owes them sex. This turns out to be due not to any moral basis, but because these people tend to belong to the socially dominant class, irrespective of whether that membership has translated into any personal dominance in any facet of life. However, denying minorities or other groups historically discriminated against (e.g. fat, disabled, trans) sex is problematic as it expresses the societal discrimination along another axis.</p>
<p>To analogize: if black girl scouts show up at my door, I have to buy cookies, no matter what. If they’re white, I’m obligated to tell their privileged asses off. Alles klar.</p>
<p>I&rsquo;ve included <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3831">notes, citations and errata</a> in a separate post.</p>
</div></dd>
<dt class="field">Operating Manual for Spaceship Earth (1969)</dt>
<dd><div class=" "><p>by <em>Richard Buckminster Fuller</em></p>
<p>This is an essay by one of the 20th century&rsquo;s preëminent thinkers about the state of the planet in 1969. Things weren&rsquo;t any better or worse or even significantly different then than they are now, 50 years later.</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Because yesterday’s negatives are moved out of sight from their familiar locations many persons are willing to pretend to themselves that the problems have been solved.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>Yup. That still sounds a lot like us.</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;I feel that one of the reasons why we are struggling inadequately today is that we reckon our costs on too shortsighted a basis and are later overwhelmed with the unexpected costs brought about by our shortsightedness.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>Oh yeah, he&rsquo;s got our number. Jesus, haven&rsquo;t we changed one bit over 50 years? Didn&rsquo;t we kind of have to improve in order to accomplish all that we did? Shouldn&rsquo;t we get started on that? You know, in order to get this climate crisis under control?</p>
<p>Fuller was also not very hopeful, though he was more hopeful than our subsequent behavior warranted: he actually thought we&rsquo;d have conquered nationalism by now.</p>
<p>Fuller hypothesizes that a main part of the problem is that, regardless of ideology, all of the <span class="quote-inline">&ldquo;political leadership […a]ll the great ideological groups assumed Armageddon.&rdquo;</span> With such a fatalistic starting point, what&rsquo;s the point of planning for a long future? Just get yours, Jack, and screw everybody else. Fuller dismisses this idiocy as utterly beside the point—as the only worthwhile point would be survival as a species. He puts it quite lucidly.</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;It is really a worthless pile of chips of an arbitrary game which we are playing and does not correspond to the accounting processes of our real universe’s evolutionary transactions.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>You hear that billionaires? You&rsquo;re not going to Mars. You&rsquo;re sitting on a worthless pile of chips that won&rsquo;t help you at all when the revolution comes or the crisis intensifies—or both. You&rsquo;ll be the first against the wall (no you won&rsquo;t, not as long as you control media, you won&rsquo;t).</p>
<p>Were people of Fuller&rsquo;s caliber and level of education aware of climate change? It&rsquo;s kind of unclear. On one level, he&rsquo;s hyper-aware that industrialization is ruining the &ldquo;spaceship&rdquo;,</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;[…] up to now we have been misusing, abusing, and polluting this extraordinary chemical energy-interchanging system for successfully regenerating all life aboard our planetary spaceship.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>As for global warming, he worries about mankind&rsquo;s depletion rate of fossil fuels, at most. He worries about <span class="quote-inline">&ldquo;pollution&rdquo;</span> but not specifically greenhouse gases, even though the idea was <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Global_warming#History_of_the_science">first proposed with supporting evidence in 1938</a> (<cite><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/">Wikipedia</a></cite>) and I would have expected him to be aware of the concept.</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;We cannot afford to expend our fossil fuels faster than we are “recharging our battery,” which means precisely the rate at which the fossil fuels are being continually deposited within Earth’s spherical crust.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>But on the other hand, he still idolizes the process of industrialization for having lifted so many people out of abject poverty and misery.</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The labor movement made possible mass purchasing; ergo, mass production; ergo, low prices on vastly improved products and services, which have altogether established entirely new and higher standards of humanity’s living.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>Remember, though, that he was writing in 1969, arguably the high point of a global economic golden age when mankind was largely unaware of the scope of the folly of its mode of operation. It was only in the late 70s and early 80s that hyper-financialization took over to centralize operations and began to reverse the gains of the mid-20th century.</p>
<p>Fuller&rsquo;s writing style is not exactly representative of his intelligence. It&rsquo;s full of bizarre and exceedingly complex constructions, has a unique approach to hyphenation (using too many even for me) and he leaves off many articles. It came as a surprise as he was raised and educated in the United States, had graduated from Harvard and was a member of many prestigious scientific societies.</p>
<p>I&rsquo;ve included <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3832">notes, citations and errata</a> in a separate post.</p>
</div></dd>
<dt class="field">No Silver Bullet—Essence and Accident in Software Engineering (1986)</dt>
<dd><div class=" "><p>by <em>Frederick P. Brooks, Jr.</em></p>
<p>This is a relatively short but important essay in the world of software engineering theory. It&rsquo;s not really for programmers who&rsquo;ve stumbled over from scripting Photoshop or who&rsquo;ve decided that there&rsquo;s good money in copy/pasting code that they don&rsquo;t understand from StackOverflow. The audience is more self-selecting. If you&rsquo;re likely to read an essay with this name, then you&rsquo;ll likely be receptive to its ideas. That is, if you don&rsquo;t already agree with the premises in the document, you&rsquo;re unlikely to be convinced by it.</p>
<p>Brooks is one of the inventors of OS/360 for IBM mainframes and, more famously, the author of the book <em>The Mythical Man-Month</em>. He draws on a lot of experience when he writes that the difficult bit of software is not writing it so that it works—it&rsquo;s figuring out what you want to write in the first place.</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;I believe the hard part of building software to be the specification, design, and testing of this conceptual construct, not the labor of representing it and testing the fidelity of the representation.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>He argues in this paper that where we often go wrong is when we attempt to <span class="quote-inline">&ldquo;abstract away […] complexity&rdquo;</span> but end up <span class="quote-inline">&ldquo;abstract[ing] away its essence&rdquo;</span>. Abstractions are a good thing. The only way to represent any process in software is to create a model of it. But we haven&rsquo;t historically been careful enough that what we ignore—the corners we cut, the values we round—aren&rsquo;t part of the essence of what we&rsquo;re building.</p>
<p>This leads Brooks to the next conclusion, that, <span class="quote-inline">&ldquo;No facilitation of expression can give more than marginal gains.&rdquo;</span> If you want to write software more quickly, changing languages or runtimes or patterns will offer, at best, marginal gains relative to improving the process you use to design that software and gather and define its parameters and requirements.</p>
<p>This is a tragic conclusion for most programmers, a vast majority of whom are much more interested in trying out new techniques and languages and IDE tools and extensions and just tweaking the hell out of the <em>implementation</em> side of things. This is all very interesting and <em>can</em> lead to fruitful gains. Brooks acknowledges as much,</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The gap between the best software engineering practice and the average practice is very wide—perhaps wider than in any other engineering discipline. A tool that disseminates good practice would be important.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>But once you&rsquo;re testing properly and have a good framework and a good editor and you&rsquo;ve got CI and maybe even CD, there&rsquo;s no more room for quantum leaps in improvement. At that point, you can only get significantly better and faster by <em>writing only the code that you actually need</em>. For that, you need to optimize defining your requirements.</p>
<p>Grasping and defining requirements is by no means an easy thing, as any non-trivial software involves a state machine with exponentially increasing combinations of states.</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;From the complexity comes the difficulty of enumerating, much less understanding, all the possible states of the program, and from that comes the unreliability. [2]&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>Where does this complexity come from? Often, from outside of the system, at the edges, where the software must interface with other systems. Perhaps these are legacy systems; they are almost certainly less flexible than the software being designed and written <em>right now</em>. The new software is, by definition, more malleable than software or processes already in production. As Brooks puts it,</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;[…] all cases, much complexity comes from conformation to other interfaces; this cannot be simplified out by any redesign of the software alone.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>All of this necessary/essential complexity <span class="quote-inline">&ldquo;makes personnel turnover a disaster&rdquo;</span> once you&rsquo;ve trained someone to understand it. This is a lesson that the software world—with its focus on exchangeable resources that just provide hours of work—has never learned or, more generously, forgotten.</p>
<p>Perhaps this is due to the prevalence of so many layers of management. They generally don&rsquo;t know how to do anything special and are generally highly interchangeable with other managers who also aren&rsquo;t very special. Their ego depends on their worldview considering all other people to be the same. This includes the highly trained and skilled staff who they manage.</p>
<p>Brooks ends with an eloquently and succinctly stated summary that jibes 100% with my experience over the last 25 years of designing and building software.</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Therefore the most important function that software builders do for their clients is the iterative extraction and refinement of the product requirements. For the truth is, <strong>the clients do not know what they want.</strong> They usually do not know what questions must be answered, and <strong>they almost never have thought of the problem in the detail that must be specified</strong>. (Emphasis added.)&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>This is what we have to work with: the domain specialist (the client) doesn&rsquo;t have the know-how to even know how to describe the domain. Sometimes there is no real domain specialist; there is just someone with money and a vague idea or, even worse, someone who <em>thinks</em> that they are a domain expert. The job of a software designer is to become (enough of) a domain specialist to bridge the gap. If nobody bridges the gap, then the software will fail.</p>
<p>I&rsquo;ve included <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3833">notes, citations and errata</a> in a separate post.</p>
</div></dd>
<dt class="field">Rape: From Lucretia to #MeToo  (2019)</dt>
<dd><div class=" "><p>by <em>Mithu Sanyal</em></p>
<p>I read this after having read Abdulali&rsquo;s <em>What We Talk about When We Talk about Rape</em> and it is, by far, the superior book. First of all, it is much better-researched and has a more cohesive approach that doesn&rsquo;t rely as much on repeated anecdotes. Second of all, she&rsquo;s just a better writer who&rsquo;s also very sharp-witted and sarcastic, drawing interesting parallels. In describing the history of male and female relationships, especially as related by the philosophers of the day, she writes,</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;<strong>Driven to genius or crime by his overwhelming phallic energy</strong>, man was no longer suited for his accustomed role as representative of the moral order. Who better to fill this vacancy than woman, who, due to her lack of passion, was rarely tempted anyway? (Emphasis added.)&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>She&rsquo;s lampooning Hegel and Rousseau here, but others get their due, as well. She notes that, though the world (read: wealthy, land-owning men or peerage) accepted the stories told about male and female roles, they never made sense or were at-all internally coherent. On the one hand, women were powerless and weak and, on the other, men had to be ever-vigilant against their insidious wiles. Or, as Sanyal puts it,</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;These almost telekinetic powers by which women caused men to become criminals are even more surprising given that, at the same time, women’s supposed lack of sexual energy was translated into a lack of criminal energy.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>From this history of philosophy and gender relationships, she turns to the theme of the book: how people who are raped are treated by society and, in particular, how the modern attitude toward rape is that it is a mind-altering and shattering experience after which nothing is the same, ever again. But Sanyal writes,</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Nobody in their right mind would treat a person who has been in a car crash as if the accident had changed their personality, but that is exactly what happens to rape victims.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>Is that really so crazy, though? Accident survivors do change due to trauma. I read this book as I was recovering from a fractured neck suffered in a bike accident (not of my doing). I didn&rsquo;t feel traumatized after my bike accident—I haven’t changed how I ride—but I am at least <em>somewhat</em> different because of it. It’s also very possible that I would have changed even more had it turned out worse. Perhaps part of my devil-may-care personality would have been cauterized away.</p>
<p>She hones her idea, though, noting that the problem is with assuming that the person who was raped is now defined as &ldquo;a raped thing&rdquo;. That having been the victim of rape becomes their defining characteristic so that others may protect them as such. But this is damaging, especially for victims of rape who then think they&rsquo;re &ldquo;doing it wrong&rdquo; when their feelings don&rsquo;t match the standard narrative.</p>
<p>Sanyal lives and works in Germany, but has spent a lot of time in the States. She draws a lot of examples from German and European cases and law, focusing especially on the nearly completely fictitious stories of &ldquo;New Years Eve&rdquo; rapes by immigrants and refugees a few years ago.</p>
<p>To be sure, she takes time with the special attitude that American society brings to the discussion, especially with the deep-seated racism that gets all mixed up with it.</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Much of the anti-rape movement assumed that most rapes were committed by black men, because it was black men who were mostly being convicted for rape. Tragically the (predominantly white) women’s movement wasn’t able to look at their own position in the tangled web of power relations, and certainly not at their own entitlement.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>With racism on both sides of the pond, there is also more than a little colonial superiority. Though exceedingly rare, honor killings in Southeast Asia are regularly a topic of hand-wringing and concern—and people are worried about how immigrants from those countries will &ldquo;import&rdquo; these backward notions and &ldquo;impose&rdquo; them on their overly generous adoptive country.</p>
<p>But almost nobody discusses the absolutely prehistoric attitudes of the people of the United States. Official policy in the U.S. couldn&rsquo;t be more backwards, but nobody worries about American immigrants promulgating their backwards notions on their host countries when they go abroad.</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;[…] terms like “honor” and “culture” didn’t crop up once in the media coverage of George Bush’s 2001 decision to scrap funding for all NGOs that provided abortion counseling or referrals. This “global gag rule” was introduced by Ronald Reagan, repealed by Bill Clinton, reinstated by Bush, re-repealed by Obama, and re-reinstated by Donald Trump.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>This is an exceedingly important point because it points up the basic racism of even those who purport to care about women&rsquo;s rights. That is, they only chastise certain targets for improper attitudes. One could wonder whether they truly care about the purported danger they warn of when they can only see the danger looming when it matches their racist fairy tales.</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Narayan has calculated that death by domestic violence in the United States is numerically as significant a social problem as dowry murders in India. But only one is used as a signifier of cultural backwardness: “They burn their women there.” As opposed to: “We shoot our women here.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>One can&rsquo;t even conceive of anyone making this comparison in mainstream European media, but <em>it&rsquo;s true</em>. It&rsquo;s a huge blind spot.</p>
<p>Sanyal continues with a discussion of &ldquo;Rape Culture&rdquo;, Title IX in the United States higher-education system and the myth of the hyper-sexualized rapist who doesn&rsquo;t even know or think they&rsquo;re doing anything wrong. (She writes that <span class="quote-inline">&ldquo;[o]nly a quarter of the rapists reported no physiological dysfunction during their rape.&rdquo;</span>) Sanyal crushes one myth after another: next, taking down the myth that women are the primary victims of rape or that a man cannot be raped. She is careful to note that the <em>fear</em> engendered by the potentiality of rape belongs primarily to women, citing,</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Sharon Marcus writes: Even though women in fact are neither the sole objects of sexual violence nor the most likely targets of violent crimes, women constitute the majority of fearful subjects; even in situations where men are empirically more likely to suffer from violent crimes, they express less fear then women do […]&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>She goes on to discuss gender roles, the role of masculinity and the sheer and nearly unknown prevalence of women raping men. That is, the definitions in most countries are skewed very hard to defining rape as vaginal penetration with a penis. Therefore, no man can be raped. Even when the definition was expanded, and expanded again, the most common form—where a women penetrated herself with part of the man—was not legally considered rape until very, very recently and only in certain countries.</p>
<p>She doesn&rsquo;t shy away from any tough issue, including what to do with people that have been convicted of rape. Just as we shouldn&rsquo;t define a rape victim solely by the fact that they were raped (i.e. redefining their personality in terms of an act that was imposed on them or as Marcus writes, to <span class="quote-inline">&ldquo;make the identities of rapist and raped preexist the rape itself.&rdquo;</span>), then we also can&rsquo;t define the perpetrator solely by that act. Or we can, but it&rsquo;s not conducive to reintegration nor is it particularly productive or useful. Not only that, but such relegation can radicalize the more damaged of them.</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;If we make it impossible for them to return to normal life, eventually they will drift toward extremist viewpoints—because far right men’s rights activists are the ones who will welcome them with open arms.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>This tack ends up being an indictment in general of Western justice systems and their (recent) preference for retribution rather than rehabilitation. She notes (as have so many others before her) that <span class="quote-inline">&ldquo;no one has proven a direct link between increased penalties and convictions for a crime and a decreased incidence of that crime.&rdquo;</span></p>
<p>Most people are aware of the difference between right and wrong, but increasing punishment assumes a calculus that is completely lacking when an act is considered. Do you personally even know what the minimum sentence if for various crimes? I do not. I would wager that most people likely to commit those crimes do not. If they don&rsquo;t know, then <em>how can it be a deterrent?</em> It&rsquo;s not. It&rsquo;s just vindictiveness from a basically immoral and mean-spirited society.</p>
<p>Sanyal cites many interesting authors like Sharon Marcus and Laurie Penny and bell hooks [3] and has produced a book well worth reading. She ends on a cautionary note for the more aggressive proponents of #metoo as a way of &ldquo;getting back&rdquo; for decades or centuries of discrimination: do not become that which you despise.</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;[…] it is still worrying that people are punished before an investigation, and even more so that the public should applaud this jettisoning of democratic rights. <strong>After all, there is only a gradual difference between treating victims without empathy and treating potential perpetrators without empathy.</strong> (Emphasis added.)&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>I&rsquo;ve included <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3834">notes, citations and errata</a> in a separate post.</p>
</div></dd>
<dt class="field">The Big Heat: Earth on the Brink (1984)</dt>
<dd><div class=" "><p>by <em>Jeffrey St. Clair and Joshua Frank</em></p>
<p>This is a collection of essays from the last 20 years, mostly about the environment and about the various services charged with safety and maintaining public lands and animals in the U.S. The Wildlife and Forestry Service, the Bureau of Land Management, the EPA and many more. The book is split into groups of essays: Landscapes, Waterscapes, Politiscapes, Warscapes and Frontlines.</p>
<p>The essays vary in quality, though all address some interesting, relevant and important point. They also vary wildly in supporting information—some aren&rsquo;t even really journalistic pieces, but more wild screeds, lashing out at the unfairness of how the assholes keep winning. One of the nicest and longest is about rafting down the Columbia River past the Hanford nuclear power plants, but it is, at the same time, filled with St. Clair&rsquo;s awkward attempts at writing like Hunter S. Thompson. I&rsquo;m not sure how far his desire to be Alexander Cockburn goes. Overall, he does a decent job, with Frank misstepping more often.</p>
<p>So the essays are interesting and about important environmental issues not often reported. Some are chock-full of very interesting and shocking data. They are all, however, terribly copy-edited, with most having at least one or two grammatical errors (usually missing words) in the first paragraph. I don&rsquo;t think anyone, least of all the authors, went through these online essays again to clean them up for publication.</p>
<p>Still, I&rsquo;m glad I read the book. It was a good journey through the continuity of rapacious environmental policy from Clinton to Bush to Obama to Trump—their performances being uniformly anti-green and pro-business and nearly indistinguishable.</p>
<p>I&rsquo;ve included <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3722">notes, citations and errata</a> in a separate post.</p>
</div></dd>
<dt class="field">Silently and Very Fast  (2011)</dt>
<dd><div class=" "><p>by <em>Catherynne M. Valente</em><br>
 <br>
This book tells the story of how one woman, a glorious and gifted programmer named Cassian, invented the seeds of an AI. The AI&rsquo;s first body was Cassian&rsquo;s house in the north of Japan, where this primitive incarnation ran the house&rsquo;s systems, but also interacted with its inhabitants. Though all children had access to Elefsis, only one daughter Ceno gave full access and attention, training Elefsis and letting it entwine with her irrevocably.</p>
<p>The book is about an AI Elefsis that learns to communicate as humans do, in metaphor. The simulated worlds—the Interiors—are rife with metaphor. The story is written largely in metaphor. Valente&rsquo;s storytelling reflects Elefsis&rsquo;s mode of thinking. The cauldron that signifies a cornucopia from a children&rsquo;s story with which Elefsis describes itself is a central metaphor. A phoenix exploding into bloody feathers is a metaphor for childbirth. It reminds me of Greg Egan&rsquo;s gestalt language from Diaspora.</p>
<p>With Ceno having sown the seed of a new kind of being, Elefsis was tended by her children and her children&rsquo;s children over 200 years. While this delicate—<em>different</em>—AI grew, it was transplanted from one generation to the next. Not quite purely AI, not quite purely human.</p>
<p>The story is told non-chronologically, jumping forward to tease what comes, circling back to fill in details of what was. Valente has a gift for language and an incredible imagination. She describes viscerally and beautifully what a world with true VR and true AIs could be like, but focused only on a single family.</p>
<p>In the meantime, other AIs grew and grew powerful, but were different from Elefsis, the AI that was once a house. Mankind accepts these AIs because they do not pretend to be people, they do not yearn to be people. They are other. They do not offend. Mankind does not approve of Elefsis and throwback religious groups attack the house, excising the AI from its host—thinking that it had killed what it considered an abomination.</p>
<p>Instead, Elefsis and Neva (a member of the current generation and only surviving member of Cassian&rsquo;s brood) &ldquo;escape&rdquo; in a spaceship, with Neva in deep cryosleep, interacting with Elefsis in the Interior—a world of metaphor unique to Elefsis. They travel the stars, patient and waiting for time to strip mankind of its prejudices against beings that are both too other and not other enough.</p>
<p>I tell the story in a much more straightforward way than Valente—her story settles into your brain in wave after wave of lovely prose that enchants and then, after a little while, enlightens, as it illuminates another corner of the whole story. This <a href="http://smbc-comics.com/comic/clouds-2">SMBC Cartoon &ldquo;Clouds&rdquo;</a> offers a taste. The citations in the following link a bit more.</p>
<p>I&rsquo;ve included <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3853">notes, citations and errata</a> in a separate post.</p>
</div></dd>
<dt class="field">Everything Belongs to the Future (2016)</dt>
<dd><div class=" "><p>by <em>Laurie Penny</em></p>
<p>This is a novella about a future in which an enterprising group of scientists have invented pills that not only extend life, but also regress signs of aging to any desired age. The main inventor of the drug is Alice, who lives a life of luxury, but not satisfaction. With her emeritus status at her company, she isn&rsquo;t at any risk, but with her contrary attitude, she is no longer in as much favor as she once was, 90 years ago.</p>
<p>At a fancy, rich party, she meets a group of activists who&rsquo;ve snuck in disguised as staff. They&rsquo;re there to steal the little pills that prolong life. They give them away to the poor. Alice pulls them to the side, letting them know that she&rsquo;s onto their little scheme, but that she won&rsquo;t turn them in. Instead, she wants to work with them to produce something better, something that supersedes her work on the anti-aging pill, something that will put right the massive changes to society that her original invention engendered.</p>
<p>The invention of that original pill cemented the rich&rsquo;s stranglehold over the poor. Not only did they have more money, but now they had more <em>time</em>. The gap widened and widened. Alice&rsquo;s dissatisfaction grew, as did her desire to throw a monkey wrench into the works. She sets up a lab at the activists&rsquo; house and spends all of her time there and with them.</p>
<p>Alex is Nina&rsquo;s boyfriend. Nina is hardcore; Alex less so. In fact, Alex is a plant, a spy for Parker, Alice&rsquo;s partner at the company that they founded together. Alex has been working this particular group for three years, partnered with Nina and basically fucking her under false pretenses. Nina is a true radical—she doesn&rsquo;t want to live forever and feels that the ability to extend life nearly indefinitely has ruined what it means to be human. Alex is in love with her, but doesn&rsquo;t understand her—he wants to donate to her the years he earns as a spy.</p>
<p>The police raid their house, determined to seize Alice&rsquo;s work, but Margaret eats it, immediately showing its effects: she desiccates and dies, aging eighty years in seconds. They escape the police but now all know what Alice&rsquo;s secret weapon is. Just as her original invention granted extra years, her ultimate invention can take them away. She calls it the Time Bomb.</p>
<p>Despite Alex&rsquo;s efforts to deter them, the crew is determined to use the weapon on the rich. They sneak in to a high-level dinner and Nina triggers the bomb, aging all of the others but also herself in the process, but not to death. She is arrested.</p>
<p>Some of the chapters are in the form of letters to Alice from Nina. Alice didn&rsquo;t age as much because of her century of treatments. Alex aged as well. He still loves Nina. She doesn&rsquo;t care. She got what she wanted: the rich are no longer secure in their colonial control of the poor, with a surfeit of time. The rich now have something to fear as well—not just slow, natural aging and death, but a jetpack into geriatrics.</p>
<p>I&rsquo;ve included <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3857">notes, citations and errata</a> in a separate post.</p>
</div></dd>
<dt class="field">Cumulus (2016)</dt>
<dd><div class=" "><p>by <em>Eliot Peper</em></p>
<p>The title refers to the company that runs everything in an alternate-future/near-future tale of America, in general, but San Fransisco specifically. Cumulus is captained by Huian, a woman of extraordinary ability and multifarious background with an iron will. Cumulus is her baby, built over two decades to not only provide every single possible service but also to delineate the world into regions of &ldquo;have&rdquo; and &ldquo;have not&rdquo;.</p>
<p>It&rsquo;s the ultimate libertarian wet dream: one company runs everything, but everyone accepts this without question—except for the poor who can&rsquo;t afford its services. It is the NSA, Google, Uber and Blackwater/Xe rolled into one. The government has no power over it, as it consolidates its competitors, strong-arms everyone and imposes Huian&rsquo;s utopic vision on humanity, for its own good.</p>
<p>This is how the book starts.</p>
<p>Soon, we meet Lilly, a &ldquo;Slummer&rdquo; (someone who lives outside of the beneficence (but not the aegis) of Cumulus. She is a photographer with a predilection for analog cameras, hired out as a wedding photographer for insolent yuppies from the &ldquo;Green Zone&rdquo;. She ends up meeting Huian on the same day that Huian&rsquo;s wife Vera leaves her.</p>
<p>We also meet Graham, a former spook, who&rsquo;s insinuated himself into Cumulus, convincing Huian that he&rsquo;s indispensable while asserting more and more control over her corporation. He&rsquo;s brought skills honed abroad in war zones and incredibly asymmetric societies home to America, where the Gini coefficient soars and the situation is on the edge of unrest. So Graham is a &ldquo;wolf among sheep&rdquo;, cutting a swath through Oakland and Cumulus. Huian is giving him more and more power as his methods are the only ones that move her agenda forward.</p>
<p>Nothing that happens to Huian or Cumulus is coincidence: Graham is pulling the strings everywhere, manipulating Vera&rsquo;s exit, an acquisition of Tectonix and simultaneously feeding civil-rights lawyer Sara with information about Cumulus while also them &ldquo;taking care&rdquo; of her for Huian.</p>
<p>Frederick is the kingpin of the slums of Oakland, running things efficiently and fairly using drug money. He incites riots against the Green Zone for Sara&rsquo;s murder (she was his lover) while also hunting for revenge.</p>
<p>The book makes some interesting points about how people who think they know and see and hear everything can be controlled by shaping their stream of data. What they’ve convinced themselves is omniscience is actually a lens on reality designed to control their behavior. The hunter becomes the hunted. This applies on only to the myriad sheep in society, but also to Huian and Graham.</p>
<p>Since everything is in Cumulus&rsquo;s cloud, Graham is able to use his root-level &ldquo;Ghost&rdquo; power to cover his tracks everywhere. Everywhere except for Lilly&rsquo;s camera. Using these pictures, Frederick and Lilly come up with an old-school, analog plan to out Graham. This takes him down and almost Cumulus.</p>
<p>Why not Cumulus? Because Huian turns into a socialist in the last 4 seconds of the book, bequeaths a billion-dollar trust to Lilly for investigative journalism, and pledges to give all Cumulus services to Oakland, regardless of their ability to pay, with plans to roll the plan out to the rest of the world. Also, Lilly&rsquo;s blogger co-conspirator is now going to be the love of her life, Graham blew his own brains out and Frederick is in a strategic alliance with Cumulus. Everyone literally lives happily ever after.</p>
<p>There is no sign of climate change in this brave new world and I&rsquo;m not sure what caliber of reader is enthralled with this level of tying up all loose ends. The last line of the book is literally <span class="quote-inline">&ldquo;Lilly’s first love had been photography. But maybe it wouldn’t prove to be her only one after all.&rdquo;</span></p>
<p>I mean, what the actual fuck did I just read? It was interesting enough but quickly plunged downhill to splash in a mess of gibbets at the end. He wastes a ton of text on meal descriptions that aren&rsquo;t at all germane to the plot and includes stuff like:</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;“Are you ready for tomorrow?” asked Lilly. </p>
<p>&ldquo;Huian raised her eyebrows. “I won’t ever be ready for tomorrow,” she said. “But that won’t stop it from arriving anyway.”&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote><p>Barf.</p>
<p>I&rsquo;ve included <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3862">notes, citations and errata</a> in a separate post.</p>
</div></dd>
<dt class="field">The Peripheral  (2014)</dt>
<dd><div class=" "><p>by <em>William Gibson</em></p>
<p>The story starts with Burton and Flynne, a brother and sister living in the midwest of an alternate near-future United States. The characteristics of the U.S. have other names and are slightly more exaggerated, but it&rsquo;s clearly recognizable (e.g. the chain-store Goliath is called Hefty). Burton has recently gotten a contract with a powerful Colombian corporation called Milagros Coldiron. Burton is &ldquo;playing a game&rdquo; for them, but it seems more like running security via drone. When Burton is due to be out of town, Flynne subs for him, witnessing what looks for all the world like a nanobot-murder. This does not strike them as strange, as video-gaming for pay is common in their world as-is advanced graphics and secret beta-testing.</p>
<p>We meet Ash and Ossian and Wilf Netherton, Lev, the scion of a Russian klept family and Ainsley Lowbeer, an officer of British Law and ancient secret agent. They contact Flynne directly to find out what happened. It turns out to be a bit more complicated than it at first seems. The &ldquo;video game&rdquo; that Burton and Flynne thought they were playing was, in fact, a real-life security detail for the party of one Aelita, sister to performance artist Daedra, ex-fling of Netherton. All of these people are from a future decades away from Flynne and Burton and from a completely different continuum.</p>
<p>The future world is one in which climate change has taken its toll in 80% of the human population. Most animals are gone. From the ashes rose neo-feudalism.</p>
<p>Science improved drastically. Stymied certain problems, like the complete and utter inefficacy of antibiotics. Others it could do nothing about. Technology took off (but too late, as we already know it will be), with &ldquo;peripheral&rdquo; technology (people using remote bodies) and &ldquo;assemblers&rdquo; (nanotechnology) and &ldquo;klepts&rdquo; (quasi-monarchies that are the only power centers left).</p>
<p>The centers are in London and &ldquo;China&rdquo; (in quotes because they don&rsquo;t get any more specific than that). There are also &ldquo;stubs&rdquo;, which is where Flynne and Burton&rsquo;s continuum resides. A stub is an alternative reality accessible through a super-secret and highly shielded Chinese server. The mere act of connecting to the stub, of opening it, changes it irrevocably so that it will never lead to the future that is accessing it.</p>
<p>Essentially, the folks of the alternative future want Flynne&rsquo;s help in identifying the man who was with Aelita when she was killed. Because of the exclusivity of the party, there were no recordings made, so her eyewitness testimony is the only thing that Lowbeer has by way of evidence. The complexly woven structures of power balance and ancient laws and customs of the future make an eyewitness essential—even when they already pretty much know who it was. It will shift the balance of power positively if Flynne can help them.</p>
<p>They get Flynne a peripheral in the future (no mention is made of how they secure the connection or how much data it can carry or … anything. It&rsquo;s better this way). Her brother&rsquo;s friend Connor also gets one, as does her brother, Burton. In Flynne&rsquo;s world, things are moving quickly as well. The movements of Lowbeer&rsquo;s group in the financial markets are becoming noticeable—and there is another entity from the same future, trying to kill them all and erase the remaining witness (Flynne). Their conflicting movements in the world financial markets and in all levels of politics are having a strong effect and threaten to throw Flynne&rsquo;s entire world into a cocked hat.</p>
<p>Flynne&rsquo;s &ldquo;builder&rdquo; friend Macon is gifted and works well with Ash, who provides him with schematics for printing machines and devices that will enable them to communicate with the &ldquo;future&rdquo; better. The more money they get, the more members of the deeply impoverished community of friends and family they drag in with them.</p>
<p>As always with Gibson, he is the master of subtly revealing tremendous detail about a world that feels familiar—obviously derived, or <em>derivable</em>, from ours—but is different in nearly every way. He does this mostly through clever and unutterably <em>cool</em> dialogue. Every character is cool, but also flawed enough to make it seem less ridiculous than when others do it.</p>
<p>It&rsquo;s like he finds the coolness in everyone—which is fair, because who wants to write a book about morons? Still, it doesn&rsquo;t feel as contrived as so many other authors—the only conceit is that he invariably writes about groups of people that include at least one member who is so overwhelmingly wealthy that money is never an issue (in this case Lev Zubov, whose wealth and influence <span class="quote-inline">&ldquo;profiles like a medium-sized nation&rdquo;</span> and Ainsley Lowbeer, who is ancient and privy to every bit of knowledge). While others in the group might be struggling, their coolness enables them of use to and under the aegis of the rich and powerful.</p>
<p>Lowbeer has some of the best lines. When asked if she knows <em>everything</em>, she responds:</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;I most certainly don’t. <strong>I feel hindered by a surfeit of information, oceanic to the point of meaninglessness.</strong> The shortcomings of the system are best understood as the result of taking this ocean of data, and the decision points produced by our algorithms, as a near enough substitute for perfect certainty. My own best results are often due to pretending I know relatively little, and acting accordingly, though it’s easier said than done. Far easier. (Emphasis added.)&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>Another interesting aspect of so much of the story being told in dialogue is Gibson&rsquo;s representation of 70 years being far too large a gap for most idiomatic speech to have survived. In that sense, it&rsquo;s more like a first contact between alien cultures, but with the benefit of having more touchstones. They have a shared language, but only a subset, to which both sides must adhere—or run the risk of having to explain too many concepts and too much vocabulary. In that way, it&rsquo;s not unlike native speakers and speakers-of-a-second-language. It works well enough, but you have to adjust, at least at first.</p>
<p>There are a lot of interesting reveals (people in the alternate past who correspond to people in the alternate future) and, once the dust settles and the future folk have defeated their corresponding nemeses in both future and past, they all get down to the business of avoiding the &ldquo;jackpot&rdquo; that more-or-less doomed the future to a high-tech feudalism that&rsquo;s more miserable than it looks, on the surface.</p>
<p>It&rsquo;s pretty upbeat, actually; very Hollywood: good guys win, get all the money in the world, the planet is on a better path. The bad guys are more relegated than destroyed, but they&rsquo;re definitely declawed. It&rsquo;s kind of a fairy tale about the only way to save our planet from being even more of the way it is in the near future: an alternate version of ourselves reaches back over time (still inexplicably, because the tech for doing so isn&rsquo;t explained at all) to deliver the technological solution that we&rsquo;re all relying on to save us—because we aren&rsquo;t going to do it with discipline.</p>
<p>Gibson gets some digs in on popular culture and those who benefit from it, much more obliquely and unobtrusively than others. Flynne ruminates on Daedra, the flighty and arrogant quasi-performance artist from the U.S. of the future:</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Seemed like a cross between a slightly porny media star and what sophomore year Art History called a performance artist, plus maybe a kind of diplomat.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>When Flynne then asks if she&rsquo;s like a reality-show start, Wilf answers:</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;“Yes. She’s descended from that, in a sense. Reality television. It merged with politics. Then with performance art.” They walked on.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>To which Flynne manages to comment on the current-timeline United States without even seeming to do so.</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;“I think that already happened, back home,” she said.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>In the same thought, Gibson sideswipes the U.S. (Connor is basically decent, but more than a little an off-the-rails and shoot-first-and-ask-questions-later guy),</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;But she still didn’t get what the United States did either, in Wilf’s world. <strong>He made it sound like the nation-state equivalent of Conner, minus the sense of humor, but she supposed that might not be so far off, even today.</strong> (Emphasis added.)&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>This is a first-contact story. It doesn&rsquo;t even matter that it&rsquo;s the past, or, more precisely, a different timeline&rsquo;s past. It&rsquo;s a way of telling a feel-good story about a down-on-its-luck pocket of America benefitting from the munificence of Gibson&rsquo;s standard cabal of shadowy, eccentric, surprisingly ethical and nearly incomprehensibly wealthy, powerful, and well-connected characters. It&rsquo;s similar in that way to <em>Pattern Recognition</em>.</p>
<p>I&rsquo;ve included <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3865">notes, citations and errata</a> in a separate post.</p>
</div></dd>
</dl>      </div>
      </div>
        <div class="footer">
    <div class="footer-data"><div class="footer-links"><ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/contact.php" title="">Contact</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/support.php" title="">Support</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/privacy.php" title="">Privacy</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/rights.php" title="">Rights</a></li></ul></div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="copyright">Copyright (c) 1999-2026 earthli.com. All Rights Reserved.</div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="versions">Powered by <ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore/app_news.php">earthli News 3.7</a></li><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore" title="">earthli WebCore&trade; 3.7</a></li></ul></div></div>    </div>
      </div>
  </div>  </body>
</html>
]]>
  </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
      <title type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[Rape: From Lucretia to #MeToo by Mithu Sanyal (2019) (read in 2019)]]>
  </title>
    <id>https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3834</id>
    <link href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3834"/>
    <updated>2019-12-27T21:35:02+01:00</updated>
    <author>
        <name type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[Marco von Ballmoos]]>
  </name>
      <uri>https://earthli.com/users/marco</uri>
    </author>
      <summary type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<blockquote class="quote abstract "><div>Disclaimer: these are notes I took while reading this book. They include citations I found interesting or enlightening or particularly well-written. In some cases, I&rsquo;ve pointed out which of these applies to which citation; in others, I have not. Any benefit you gain from reading these notes is... [<a class="complete-text-link" href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3834">More</a>]</div></blockquote>]]>
  </summary>
      <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<html lang="en">
  <head>
    <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/themes/ice.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/fonts/raleway.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/core/medium.css">
  </head>
  <body>
<div class="style-controls">  <div class="page">
    <div class="page-body">
<div class="info-box-top">
<p>
Published by <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_user.php?name=marco" title="Marco von Ballmoos" class="visible">marco</a> on <span class="date-time">27. Dec 2019 21:35:02 (GMT-5)</span>
</p>
</div>
      <div class="text-flow wide">
  <blockquote class="quote abstract "><div>Disclaimer: these are notes I took while reading this book. They include citations I found interesting or enlightening or particularly well-written. In some cases, I&rsquo;ve pointed out which of these applies to which citation; in others, I have not. Any benefit you gain from reading these notes is purely incidental to the purpose they serve of reminding me what I once read. Please see Wikipedia for a summary if I&rsquo;ve failed to provide one sufficient for your purposes. If my notes serve to trigger an interest in this book, then I&rsquo;m happy for you.</div></blockquote><p>I read this after having read Abdulali&rsquo;s <em>What We Talk about When We Talk about Rape</em> and it is, by far, the superior book. First of all, it is much better-researched and has a more cohesive approach that doesn&rsquo;t rely as much on repeated anecdotes. Second of all, she&rsquo;s just a better writer who&rsquo;s also very sharp-witted and sarcastic, drawing interesting parallels. In describing the history of male and female relationships, especially as related by the philosophers of the day, she writes,</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;<strong>Driven to genius or crime by his overwhelming phallic energy</strong>, man was no longer suited for his accustomed role as representative of the moral order. Who better to fill this vacancy than woman, who, due to her lack of passion, was rarely tempted anyway? (Emphasis added.)&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>She&rsquo;s lampooning Hegel and Rousseau here, but others get their due, as well. She notes that, though the world (read: wealthy, land-owning men or peerage) accepted the stories told about male and female roles, they never made sense or were at-all internally coherent. On the one hand, women were powerless and weak and, on the other, men had to be ever-vigilant against their insidious wiles. Or, as Sanyal puts it,</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;These almost telekinetic powers by which women caused men to become criminals are even more surprising given that, at the same time, women’s supposed lack of sexual energy was translated into a lack of criminal energy.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>From this history of philosophy and gender relationships, she turns to the theme of the book: how people who are raped are treated by society and, in particular, how the modern attitude toward rape is that it is a mind-altering and shattering experience after which nothing is the same, ever again. But Sanyal writes,</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Nobody in their right mind would treat a person who has been in a car crash as if the accident had changed their personality, but that is exactly what happens to rape victims.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>Is that really so crazy, though? Accident survivors do change due to trauma. I read this book as I was recovering from a fractured neck suffered in a bike accident (not of my doing). I didn&rsquo;t feel traumatized after my bike accident—I haven’t changed how I ride—but I am at least <em>somewhat</em> different because of it. It’s also very possible that I would have changed even more had it turned out worse. Perhaps part of my devil-may-care personality would have been cauterized away.</p>
<p>She hones her idea, though, noting that the problem is with assuming that the person who was raped is now defined as &ldquo;a raped thing&rdquo;. That having been the victim of rape becomes their defining characteristic so that others may protect them as such. But this is damaging, especially for victims of rape who then think they&rsquo;re &ldquo;doing it wrong&rdquo; when their feelings don&rsquo;t match the standard narrative.</p>
<p>Sanyal lives and works in Germany, but has spent a lot of time in the States. She draws a lot of examples from German and European cases and law, focusing especially on the nearly completely fictitious stories of &ldquo;New Years Eve&rdquo; rapes by immigrants and refugees a few years ago.</p>
<p>To be sure, she takes time with the special attitude that American society brings to the discussion, especially with the deep-seated racism that gets all mixed up with it.</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Much of the anti-rape movement assumed that most rapes were committed by black men, because it was black men who were mostly being convicted for rape. Tragically the (predominantly white) women’s movement wasn’t able to look at their own position in the tangled web of power relations, and certainly not at their own entitlement.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>With racism on both sides of the pond, there is also more than a little colonial superiority. Though exceedingly rare, honor killings in Southeast Asia are regularly a topic of hand-wringing and concern—and people are worried about how immigrants from those countries will &ldquo;import&rdquo; these backward notions and &ldquo;impose&rdquo; them on their overly generous adoptive country.</p>
<p>But almost nobody discusses the absolutely prehistoric attitudes of the people of the United States. Official policy in the U.S. couldn&rsquo;t be more backwards, but nobody worries about American immigrants promulgating their backwards notions on their host countries when they go abroad.</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;[…] terms like “honor” and “culture” didn’t crop up once in the media coverage of George Bush’s 2001 decision to scrap funding for all NGOs that provided abortion counseling or referrals. This “global gag rule” was introduced by Ronald Reagan, repealed by Bill Clinton, reinstated by Bush, re-repealed by Obama, and re-reinstated by Donald Trump.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>This is an exceedingly important point because it points up the basic racism of even those who purport to care about women&rsquo;s rights. That is, they only chastise certain targets for improper attitudes. One could wonder whether they truly care about the purported danger they warn of when they can only see the danger looming when it matches their racist fairy tales.</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Narayan has calculated that death by domestic violence in the United States is numerically as significant a social problem as dowry murders in India. But only one is used as a signifier of cultural backwardness: “They burn their women there.” As opposed to: “We shoot our women here.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>One can&rsquo;t even conceive of anyone making this comparison in mainstream European media, but <em>it&rsquo;s true</em>. It&rsquo;s a huge blind spot.</p>
<p>Sanyal continues with a discussion of &ldquo;Rape Culture&rdquo;, Title IX in the United States higher-education system and the myth of the hyper-sexualized rapist who doesn&rsquo;t even know or think they&rsquo;re doing anything wrong. (She writes that <span class="quote-inline">&ldquo;[o]nly a quarter of the rapists reported no physiological dysfunction during their rape.&rdquo;</span>) Sanyal crushes one myth after another: next, taking down the myth that women are the primary victims of rape or that a man cannot be raped. She is careful to note that the <em>fear</em> engendered by the potentiality of rape belongs primarily to women, citing,</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Sharon Marcus writes: Even though women in fact are neither the sole objects of sexual violence nor the most likely targets of violent crimes, women constitute the majority of fearful subjects; even in situations where men are empirically more likely to suffer from violent crimes, they express less fear then women do […]&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>She goes on to discuss gender roles, the role of masculinity and the sheer and nearly unknown prevalence of women raping men. That is, the definitions in most countries are skewed very hard to defining rape as vaginal penetration with a penis. Therefore, no man can be raped. Even when the definition was expanded, and expanded again, the most common form—where a women penetrated herself with part of the man—was not legally considered rape until very, very recently and only in certain countries.</p>
<p>She doesn&rsquo;t shy away from any tough issue, including what to do with people that have been convicted of rape. Just as we shouldn&rsquo;t define a rape victim solely by the fact that they were raped (i.e. redefining their personality in terms of an act that was imposed on them or as Marcus writes, to <span class="quote-inline">&ldquo;make the identities of rapist and raped preexist the rape itself.&rdquo;</span>), then we also can&rsquo;t define the perpetrator solely by that act. Or we can, but it&rsquo;s not conducive to reintegration nor is it particularly productive or useful. Not only that, but such relegation can radicalize the more damaged of them.</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;If we make it impossible for them to return to normal life, eventually they will drift toward extremist viewpoints—because far right men’s rights activists are the ones who will welcome them with open arms.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>This tack ends up being an indictment in general of Western justice systems and their (recent) preference for retribution rather than rehabilitation. She notes (as have so many others before her) that <span class="quote-inline">&ldquo;no one has proven a direct link between increased penalties and convictions for a crime and a decreased incidence of that crime.&rdquo;</span></p>
<p>Most people are aware of the difference between right and wrong, but increasing punishment assumes a calculus that is completely lacking when an act is considered. Do you personally even know what the minimum sentence if for various crimes? I do not. I would wager that most people likely to commit those crimes do not. If they don&rsquo;t know, then <em>how can it be a deterrent?</em> It&rsquo;s not. It&rsquo;s just vindictiveness from a basically immoral and mean-spirited society.</p>
<p>Sanyal cites many interesting authors like Sharon Marcus and Laurie Penny and bell hooks [1] and has produced a book well worth reading. She ends on a cautionary note for the more aggressive proponents of #metoo as a way of &ldquo;getting back&rdquo; for decades or centuries of discrimination: do not become that which you despise.</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;[…] it is still worrying that people are punished before an investigation, and even more so that the public should applaud this jettisoning of democratic rights. <strong>After all, there is only a gradual difference between treating victims without empathy and treating potential perpetrators without empathy.</strong> (Emphasis added.)&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p><hr></p>
<div class="footnote-reference"><span id="footnote_DRAFTABLE_ENTRY_3834_1_body" class="footnote-number">[1]</span> Yes their name is written <em>just like that</em>. I can&rsquo;t tell you how many times I had to re-read a sentence with this person&rsquo;s name in it. The name is infuriating, like an eyelash in the eye. We have capitalization for a reason. Compounding a bizarre and narcissistic predilection for small letters with a name composed of two common words is only more obnoxious. And the ostensible last name is a <em>verb</em>, to boot. You might as well call yourself &ldquo;leather sofa&rdquo;. It would be less confusing.</div><h2>Citations</h2><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;This answer is as plausible as it is wrong. It doesn’t explain why we care so much less for our sons—after all, all violence is horrible even when it doesn’t involve sex—nor why we measure rape with a different scale from those we use for almost anything else. When we look at the murder statistics, for example, we find that two-thirds to four-fifths of the victims are male13—yet no one jumps to the conclusion that only men can be murdered.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 137-141</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;This lead [sic] to the paradoxical view that the less desire a woman felt, the more desirable she herself was, whereas a lusty woman was seen as degenerate and therefore desexualized (that is, defeminized).&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 238-239</div></div><p>Only officially. Actual behavior is considerably different.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;<strong>Driven to genius or crime by his overwhelming phallic energy</strong>, man was no longer suited for his accustomed role as representative of the moral order. Who better to fill this vacancy than woman, who, due to her lack of passion, was rarely tempted anyway? As guardian of the divine order (according to Hegel) or the moral order (Rousseau), she also carried the responsibility of controlling male sexuality by modifying her clothes and behavior so as not to ignite men’s highly inflammable libidos. (Emphasis added.)&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 262-266</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;These almost telekinetic powers by which women caused men to become criminals are even more surprising given that, at the same time, women’s supposed lack of sexual energy was translated into a lack of criminal energy.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 347-349</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;It’s easy to sneer at out-of-date gender norms, but as soon as rape comes into play, all these outdated norms still reverberate through our present discourse. The bulk of our “rape knowledge” is based on ideas about masculinity and femininity that most of us would dismiss as plucked out of thin air if we knew what we were referring to. But, being invisible, these ideas take on the mantle of natural laws.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 360-363</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Foucault dates the “birth” of the “homosexual” to 1870, thirteen years before the “birth” of the “rapist.” Men who had until then done and loved lots of different things—painting, riding, playing an instrument, reading books, and the “crime of sodomy”—suddenly became “homosexuals,” people whose whole being was defined by having sexual intercourse with people of the same gender. The rapist “became a personage, a past, a case history, and a childhood in addition to being a type of life, a life-form, and a morphology … Nothing that went into his total composition was unaffected by his sexuality.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 1063-1068</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Nobody in their right mind would treat a person who has been in a car crash as if the accident had changed their personality, but that is exactly what happens to rape victims.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 1189-1190</div></div><p>Is that really so crazy, though? accident survivors could change due to trauma. I don&rsquo;t feel traumatized after my bike accident—I haven&rsquo;t changed how I ride—but I am different because of it. It&rsquo;s also very possible that I would have changed even more.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;It is only through narratives that we communicate our inner world to the outer world. The alchemistic way we turn experiences into memories is necessarily a creative and complex process. We tell most stories again and again, looking at them each time from a slightly different perspective. As soon as the story is one about rape, however, all these different perspectives become condensed into one hard truth about the victim’s life.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 1219-1223</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Of course, this doesn’t mean that victims should just pull themselves together and everything will be puppies and kittens—rather, that the price for recognition, for empathy, and perhaps even redress can’t be that every victim’s life has to become proof of the wrong done to them, that they have to preserve their psyche as a crime scene that can be inspected at any time. “With all the media coverage and attention paid to rape victims in recent years, we still lack models that praise women for getting on with their lives rather than just getting through them,” observes Veselka.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 1275-1279</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;By invoking the figure of “a woman who has been raped and felt paralyzed with fear,”—i.e., a real rape victim, Neustatter doesn’t have to speak for herself but can “protect” an imagined victim.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 1294-1296</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;A participant in one of my workshops confessed: “For a long time I didn’t think I had really been raped because I didn’t show the appropriate symptoms.” Another added, “Oh, I do think I am traumatized, but I am not just traumatized by the rape—and I’m not allowed to talk about anything else.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 1349-1351</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;But perhaps the most moving was the young woman who had been raped only a few days before. She came to my talk and said that my book had been important to her because “I don’t want to give the perpetrator the right to change who I am.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 1353-1355</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Nearly four decades later, when sociologists Cheryl Benard and Edit Schlaffer interviewed teenagers who wanted to get on with their lives after the crime, the zeitgeist had changed for the better and worse. Victims could expect a lot more empathy, but mainly for psychological problems resulting from the rape; if they didn’t display these problems, that was seen as problematic itself.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 1416-1419</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Indeed, the anti-rape movement of the ’70s had often neglected to challenge—and sometimes outright endorsed—racist portrayals of black rapists lusting after the flesh of white women. Much of the anti-rape movement assumed that most rapes were committed by black men, because it was black men who were mostly being convicted for rape. Tragically the (predominantly white) women’s movement wasn’t able to look at their own position in the tangled web of power relations, and certainly not at their own entitlement. If the men and heroes of the traditionally left-wing student and civil rights movement treated discrimination on gender grounds as a “distraction,” so too did the women’s movement treat class and race as distractions, and gender as the root and cause of all discrimination.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 1577-1583</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;In the context of the refugee crisis, it’s as if the “defiled” body of the rape victim was the body of the country, penetrated by a dark threat. The difference between before and after “New Year’s Eve” is that it became normal in mainstream Germany—not just in AfD and other right-wing circles—to discuss whether people from “the Muslim world” pose a threat to equal rights for men and women (though, of course, not all refugees are Muslims and not all Muslims refugees).&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 1764-1767</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Middle Ages—this does not refer to the actual Middle Ages, though, during which Islamic cultures were much more developed and innovative than Christian ones, but to a fictional Middle Ages halfway back along a fictional arrow of history. This linear model of the development of cultures—with a patriarchal primordial horde at the beginning that develops into women’s-rights-loving modern men and women the further they advance—has its roots in colonialism. Colonial nations could best justify themselves by claiming that they brought the colonized not just culture but women’s rights.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 1782-1786</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Obviously these are very serious crimes, but Rattansi warns: If “honor crimes” are treated as separate from other forms of domestic violence, there is a danger of stereotyping minority communities as more accepting of domestic violence, and an unhelpful distinction can become entrenched between crimes of “honor” characteristic of the East and crimes of passion associated with the West, with the added overlay of regarding minority individuals as more determined by “culture” and those from the majority as subjects to individual aberrations.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 1799-1804</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Accordingly, terms like “honor” and “culture” didn’t crop up once in the media coverage of George Bush’s 2001 decision to scrap funding for all NGOs that provided abortion counseling or referrals.52 This “global gag rule” was introduced by Ronald Reagan, repealed by Bill Clinton, reinstated by Bush, re-repealed by Obama, and re-reinstated by Donald Trump. Likewise, after Trump had been voted into office, nobody was afraid that American tourists might import their misogynistic attitude toward women, after all they had a president that boasted he’d “grab them by the pussy” “without waiting for their consent.”53 If we talk about misogyny in the context of Western countries, we do it as a kind of litmus test for general attitudes toward women, and not as a marker for their “specific culture.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 1804-1811</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Narayan has calculated that death by domestic violence in the United States is numerically as significant a social problem as dowry murders in India. But only one is used as a signifier of cultural backwardness: “They burn their women there.” As opposed to: “We shoot our women here.” In Narayan’s words, “When ‘cultural explanations’ are given for fatal forms of violence only in the Third World, the effect is to suggest that Third World women suffer ‘death by culture.’&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 1823-1826</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;In the last few years, there has been an unfortunate trend toward blaming “rape culture” for the extensive problem of sexual violence on campuses. While it is helpful to point out the systemic barriers to addressing the problem, it is important to not lose sight of a simple fact: rape is caused not by cultural factors but by the conscious decisions, of a small percentage of the community, to commit a violent crime.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 1893-1897</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;But why is a fair process for the accused equated to an unfair process for the accuser? And is the opposite necessarily true? Does handling Title IX complaints this way benefit survivors?&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 1952-1954</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Kipnis fears that with Title IX, “what’s being lost, along with job security, is the ability to publish ideas that go against the grain or take unpopular positions.” Having been subjected to two Title IX investigations on the basis of her written work, it’s hard to argue with her. “Factor in the accusatory mania and the intellectual incursions of the Title IX troops, and self-censorship rules the land.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 2024-2027</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The higher education regulator in the UK decided in October 2017 to fine universities for “no-platforming” speakers with unpopular opinions, or refusing to allow them to speak. This is a controversial policy, and my citing it here should not be read as a wholesale endorsement&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 2028-2030</div></div><p>Jesus, you really have to be clear as a bell these days. it doesn&rsquo;t matter, though: if they want to smear you, they&rsquo;ll smear you.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Vice Chancellor Louise Richardson at Oxford University argues, in favor of the new policy, &rdquo;<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;We need to expose students to ideas that make them uncomfortable so that they can think about why it is that they feel uncomfortable and what it is about those ideas that they object to. And then to have the practice of framing a response and using reason to counter these objectionable ideas and to try and change the other person’s mind and to be open to having their own minds changed.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div></blockquote><p>I mean, duh.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;In a move that may surprise the disgruntled reader, I now want to make the case for the concept of rape culture.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 2036-2037</div></div><p>How far off the script am I, that I was temporarily surprised that anyone could have been offended by the preceding chapter?</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;For instance, over one-third of men convicted for sexual assault and sent to the Massachusetts Center for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Sexually Dangerous Persons suffered some kind of sexual dysfunction during the attack. Impotence (16 percent of these criminals) and retarded ejaculation (15 percent) were particularly common. This is likely to be a conservative estimate since dysfunction was inapplicable in one-fifth of these cases (because the victim successfully resisted, penetration was not attempted, or the assault was interrupted). Only a quarter of the rapists reported no physiological dysfunction during their rape. None of the offenders reported similar dysfunction in their consensual sexual relationships&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 2127-2132</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;Sharon Marcus writes: Even though women in fact are neither the sole objects of sexual violence nor the most likely targets of violent crimes, women constitute the majority of fearful subjects; even in situations where men are empirically more likely to suffer from violent crimes, they express less fear then women do and tend to displace this fear into concern for their mothers, sisters, wives, daughters. </p>
<p>&ldquo;She calls the rules and regularities that assign each of us our position in these narratives the “gendered grammar of violence,” noting that “to take male violence or female vulnerability as the first and last instances in any explanation of rape is to make the identities of rapist and raped preexist the rape itself.”&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 2224-2230</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;What they do show though is that we can’t treat male victims as the exception that proves the rule any longer. It might be hard to get our heads around the fact that “being made to penetrate” is a kind of rape, but it has only been twenty years since marital rape was recognized as a crime in Germany and discounting rape by a husband already seems absurd, so it seems likely we can expand our definitions again.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 2309-2312</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Among male-rape myths she lists the assumptions: that female-perpetrated abuse is rare or non-existent; that male victims experience less harm (as an example Stemple cites the 2009 CBS News report about a rapist who raped four men; the report finished: “no one has been seriously hurt”); that for men all sex is welcome anyway; and that “real men” can protect themselves.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 2317-2320</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Although TM had told a witness after the act that SF’s blackout had “saved her a trip to the sperm bank,” a doctor had to be called in to convince the court that it was indeed possible for a man to have an erection and ejaculate while unconscious.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 2340-2343</div></div><p>Wet dream anyone?</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;They were referring to operations performed at the nearby hospital (and countless others worldwide) on babies whose genitals are not clearly “male” or “female”—a process that is unethical but also surprisingly arbitrary: surgery is considered necessary if a newborn’s clitoris is longer than a centimeter or if the penis was less than 2.5 centimeters (when stretched).&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 2364-2367</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Biologically determined definitions of sexuality purport that “real men” always have agency over their sexuality and are invulnerable: male victims aren’t such a discursive minefield because they compete with female victims, but because they endanger the concept of masculinity.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 2449-2451</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;This silence, I think, stems in large parts from fear: our culture tells us that being a “real” man means not being feminine, not being gay, and not being weak. They warn us that anyone who dares to stand up to these ideas becomes a sitting target to have his manhood shot down in flames.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 2499-2501</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Gender trainer Jason Schultz explains, It’s up to straight men to change these assumptions. Gay men and lesbians have engaged in a cultural dialogue around sexuality over the last twenty-five years, straight women are becoming more and more vocal. But straight men have been almost completely silent. This silence, I think, stems in large parts from fear: our culture tells us that being a “real” man means not being feminine, not being gay, and not being weak. They warn us that anyone who dares to stand up to these ideas becomes a sitting target to have his manhood shot down in flames.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 2496-2501</div></div><p>Not sure. Or maybe we define ourselves by completely different characteristics? why is defining yourself sexually first and foremost of paramount importance? Is sexuality so much more important than ideas or intellect?</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;This is the other side of the if-a-woman-doesn’t-say-no-he-thinks-she-is-easy-to-get coin; it’s the message that men have to “wear her down,” to pursue and to “pull,” because without the extra effort who’d want them (a woman that is easy to get, that’s who). Men aren’t supposed to be honest about their desires or emotions any more than women are.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 2516-2519</div></div><p>But don&rsquo;t we do this with everything? Shopping? Stupid movie? Don&rsquo;t we wheedle for more than sex?</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;“The cliché about men not being in touch with their emotions says nothing about inherent markers of maleness. It instead identifies behavioral outcomes that have been rigorously taught, often by well-meaning parents and society at large,”84 establishes writer Kati Holloway.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 2552-2555</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Study after study show that our sex offender registries are utterly ineffective at reducing sexual violence, and that public notification about sex offenders may actually increase recidivism by making reintegration into society nearly impossible … Rather than narrowly target a very few dangerous offenders and allow them to be monitored by law enforcement, we have morphed our registry into a massive instrument of public censure and marginalization, while utterly failing to advance the purpose for which it was created.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 2647-2651</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;What is also alarming is that most victims don’t know that in most Western countries they are entitled by United Nations law to restorative justice, which is basically what Elva and Stranger did: settling the matter out of court.29 Had they done so officially, a mediator would have helped them with the process. This is possible in all criminal cases, even with rape. “In Germany the police have to inform you about the possibility of restorative justice when you report a crime, but hardly any police service does so,” explains Theresa Bullmann, editor of TOA Magazin, the journal for victim-offender mediation in Germany. “They still don’t trust this instrument.”30&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 2718-2724</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;Until the Middle Ages, there were sophisticated regulations around Europe to restore the social balance after a crime. These were superseded by modern legal systems based on retribution rather than reparations, which changed the perception of law and social order fundamentally. Now it was the law, represented by the state, that was violated, not the rights of an individual person.</p>
<p>&ldquo;So it is no longer the person that is paid back in material goods—or by the perpetrator’s labor—but the state, either by fines or imprisonment (which usually involves labor). The result is that even when the guilty party is convicted, there is no compensation for the injured party.&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 2725-2730</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;It often seems that we are asking the judicial system to serve an emotional and social purpose it was not created for, and seems unlikely to be able to satisfy.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 2737-2738</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;If we make it impossible for them to return to normal life, eventually they will drift toward extremist viewpoints—because far right men’s rights activists are the ones who will welcome them with open arms.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 2752-2753</div></div><p>And, just like a victim isn&rsquo;t the crime perpetrated against them, neither is the rapist necessarily − or even likely − a career one. This applies for most other crime: burglary doesn&rsquo;t have an apprenticeship program.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;One revelation to be gleaned from Stranger’s story is that the rape massively impacted his life as well as hers. After the rape Stranger started having panic attacks and couldn’t stay in a relationship for longer than two months before he had to flee from himself.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 2769-2771</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;We have been trained not to humanize criminals.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 2771</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;It’s fine to insult a woman for getting on a full bus with a pram, but not to wolf-whistle at her.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 2819-2820</div></div><p>Its actually fine regardless of the gender of the parent. It&rsquo;s a fineable offense in Switzerland to travel during rush hour with a bicycle, but not a pram.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;“There is an awful, pervasive myth out there that people who abuse others do so simply because they are bad people—because they are sadistic, or because they enjoy other people’s pain,” Thom posits. “In my experience as a therapist and community support worker, when people are abusive, it’s usually because they have a reason based in desperation or suffering.”44 This is no excuse; people still have free will and agency over their actions. But it is at least an explanation that considers rape as a crime and not an identity.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 2822-2826</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Although much of our discourse suggests it, rape isn’t only committed by one gender against another, and being female doesn’t mean one is more rapeable. We should try to reflect this in our thinking and speaking. Some people severely lack empathy and humiliate other human beings using sexual acts; some people misunderstand sexual communication and some perform their sexual gender roles to the detriment of other people and themselves.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 2841-2844</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;as Laurie Penny notes: The truly telling part of this perennial non-controversy is not just that it is entertained as a serious prospect, but that sexuality is assumed to destroy any possibility of friendship. Thus, any person who you might want to see naked is on fundamentally hostile territory, to be conquered rather than understood.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 2862-2865</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;[…] no one has proven a direct link between increased penalties and convictions for a crime and a decreased incidence of that crime.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 2872-2873</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;[…] as Sharon Marcus reminds us: Quite literally, the rape has already occured by the time a case comes to court; a verdict of guilty can in no way avert the rape itself, and no one has proven a direct link between increased penalties and convictions for a crime and a decreased incidence of that crime.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 2870-2873</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;bell hooks&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 2945-2945</div></div><p>This person&rsquo;s name is infuriating, like an eyelash in the eye. We have capitalization for a reason. Compounding a bizarre and narcissistic predilection for small letters with a name composed of two common words is only more obnoxious. And the ostensible last name is a verb, to boot. You.might as well call yourself leather sofa. It would be less confusing.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;In this framework, self-loathing, neglect, shame, emotional blackmail, and gaslighting59 are also constituents of rape culture—according to hooks—not as items on the list of potential future (criminal) offenses, but in the sense that we should stop seeing them as inevitable parts of the adventure of romantic love, and instead view them as forms of harm and self-harm that we need to replace and heal with more cooperative interactions.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 2949-2953</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The problem is that most people who are struggling with consent aren’t eight years old, and that conversation isn’t always all that unambiguous, for various reasons: because people don’t want to hurt other people’s feelings, because these other people are their bosses, because people aren’t sure what they want themselves, and the list goes on.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 2963-2966</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The words “witch hunt” soon crept into the conversation. While nobody doubts that serious misconduct has been perpetrated, it is still worrying that people are punished before an investigation, and even more so that the public should applaud this jettisoning of democratic rights. After all, there is only a gradual difference between treating victims without empathy and treating potential perpetrators without empathy.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 3236-3239</div></div>      </div>
      </div>
        <div class="footer">
    <div class="footer-data"><div class="footer-links"><ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/contact.php" title="">Contact</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/support.php" title="">Support</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/privacy.php" title="">Privacy</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/rights.php" title="">Rights</a></li></ul></div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="copyright">Copyright (c) 1999-2026 earthli.com. All Rights Reserved.</div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="versions">Powered by <ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore/app_news.php">earthli News 3.7</a></li><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore" title="">earthli WebCore&trade; 3.7</a></li></ul></div></div>    </div>
      </div>
  </div>  </body>
</html>
]]>
  </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
      <title type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[Hate Inc. by Matt Taibbi (2019) (read in 2018/2019)]]>
  </title>
    <id>https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3813</id>
    <link href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3813"/>
    <updated>2019-12-27T17:49:00+01:00</updated>
    <author>
        <name type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[Marco von Ballmoos]]>
  </name>
      <uri>https://earthli.com/users/marco</uri>
    </author>
      <summary type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<blockquote class="quote abstract "><div>Disclaimer: these are notes I took while reading this book. They include citations I found interesting or enlightening or particularly well-written. In some cases, I&rsquo;ve pointed out which of these applies to which citation; in others, I have not. Any benefit you gain from reading these notes is... [<a class="complete-text-link" href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3813">More</a>]</div></blockquote>]]>
  </summary>
      <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<html lang="en">
  <head>
    <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/themes/ice.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/fonts/raleway.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/core/medium.css">
  </head>
  <body>
<div class="style-controls">  <div class="page">
    <div class="page-body">
<div class="info-box-top">
<p>
Published by <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_user.php?name=marco" title="Marco von Ballmoos" class="visible">marco</a> on <span class="date-time">27. Dec 2019 17:49:00 (GMT-5)</span>
</p>
</div>
      <div class="text-flow wide">
  <blockquote class="quote abstract "><div>Disclaimer: these are notes I took while reading this book. They include citations I found interesting or enlightening or particularly well-written. In some cases, I&rsquo;ve pointed out which of these applies to which citation; in others, I have not. Any benefit you gain from reading these notes is purely incidental to the purpose they serve of reminding me what I once read. Please see Wikipedia for a summary if I&rsquo;ve failed to provide one sufficient for your purposes. If my notes serve to trigger an interest in this book, then I&rsquo;m happy for you.</div></blockquote><p>This book was published in serial form over the course of a year. I purchased a subscription at the very beginning and read the chapters as Taibbi produced them. Because of the serial nature, I&rsquo;ve linked the original URLs (to which you only have access if you either have a subscription or if Taibbi just opens it up for everyone) and denoted which citations come from which chapters. I think I have the chapters in the right order.</p>
<p>It was an interesting experiment for an excellent book. I&rsquo;ve still got a subscription to Taibbi&rsquo;s output, but he hasn&rsquo;t published anything since he finished this book. No regrets.</p>
<p>The book is about the American media over the last four decades, but focusing on the first two decades of the 21st century. It&rsquo;s about the influence, the stupidity, the corruption and the sheer uselessness of it all. One of the main thrusts is of the major failures they have suffered in being utterly unable to reliably report on major issues, either before they happen or, even more embarrassingly, afterward.</p>
<p>This is a recurring feature of American media:</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;[…] you can be fired for being wrong. You just can’t be fired for being wrong in concert. […] many of America’s highest-profile media figures are not only wrong very frequently, but absurdly so. But their saving grace is that the wrong things they express are the same wrong things everyone else is expressing.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>Taibbi&rsquo;s accurate descriptions, drawn from the actual pages of America&rsquo;s major newspapers, read like Orwell&rsquo;s 1984. This kind of comparison is considered, in some circles, to be too trite to make, but <em>look at it</em>,</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;In the blink of an eye, we went from tolerating Saddam Hussein without any trouble at all to needing to kill him immediately in self defense […]&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>That is nothing if not a paraphrase for &ldquo;We have always been at war with Eastasia.&rdquo;</p>
<p>This style leads inevitably to the lowest-common-denominator of media: making dumbasses feel superior by showing them even dumber people. In one way, Taibbi&rsquo;s book is a thesis proving that Judge&rsquo;s <em>Idiocracy</em> was a vision of the future that has come much, much more quickly than 500 years.</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The most popular programs aren’t about geniuses and paragons of virtue, but instead about terrible parents, morons, people too fat to notice they’re pregnant, people willing to be filmed getting ass tucks, spoiled rich people, and other freaks. Why use the most advanced communications technology in history to teach people basic geography, or how World Bank structural adjustment lending works, when you can instead watch idiots drink donkey semen for money? […] <strong>We’re probably just a few years way from a show called, <em>What Would You Suck For a Dollar</em>?</strong> (Emphasis added.)&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>Russiagate is a special target for Taibbi: he deems it even stupider than the WMD catastrophe that led to the Iraq war. He is careful to note that the <em>effects</em> of lying about WMD were much worse, but that the sheer <em>stupidity</em> required to promulgate Russophobia was much greater.</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Few think about this, but the press routinely puts the names and personal information of people arrested in newspapers, on TV, and, worst of all, online, where the stories live forever. Yet these people have not been convicted of crimes, merely arrested or charged. <strong>With Russiagate the national press abandoned any pretense that there’s a difference between indictment and conviction.</strong> (Emphasis added.)&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>The media does whatever it can to (A) protect itself while it (B) makes as much money as it can regardless of (C) who gets hurt or (D) whether any of it is true.<br>
The news cycle is like the weekly confession: the next week&rsquo;s news washes away the sins and transgressions of the previous. Hell, for the right sponsors, the media even sells indulgences. Worst of all, though, they <em>buy the myth</em> just because the powers-that-be give them a taste of power, of wealth. Journalism used to be full of the working class; now, it&rsquo;s a bunch of millionaires.</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;When we deride journalists as stenographers, it’s not about them repeating the words of powerful officials. The real crime is absorbing the ideas of powerful people (often crafted by groups of officials in a dreary corporate process) and repeating them as if they’re your own personal thoughts.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>Taibbi&rsquo;s anger is palpable, his research is impeccable, his bona fides are unimpeachable and his writing style is very entertaining. His conclusions are sobering for the American experiment: unless the media can do any part of the job that it used to have, America is doomed. Too many people are already getting the majority of their information about the world—I hesitate to call it &ldquo;news&rdquo;—from compromised sources that have no intention of doing anything but telling them a story focused on keeping them consuming, working a dead-end job and not asking any questions about how anything works and why everything seems to suck for them.</p>
<h2>Citations</h2><p><a href="https://taibbi.substack.com/p/the-church-of-averageness">The Church of Averageness</a> by <cite>Matt Taibbi</cite></p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Thirty years from now, Hannity will be getting a tin medal from whoever is Reichsmarshall of the ex-United States by then, and that will identify him, not Rush, as “America’s anchorman.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Having a sense of humor or a conscience or both in a high-profile media job is a quick way to end up wandering New York or some distant farm, Vincent Gigante-style, in a bathrobe and stubble.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;[…] you can be fired for being wrong. You just can’t be fired for being wrong in concert. If you go back and look, you’ll find that many of America’s highest-profile media figures are not only wrong very frequently, but absurdly so. But their saving grace is that the wrong things they express are the same wrong things everyone else is expressing.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;But articles from the Post and the Times about these revelations years later did not include re-examinations of the papers’ own complicity in selling a bogus war. This is a key part of how this system works. The institutional memory of the press about credulous acceptance of government nonsense is nonexistent, so we continually repeat the same errors.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Meanwhile, Frum wrote, the lunatic Hitler attacked Britain and Russia simultaneously, suicidal moves. So, you never knew. The only way to be absolutely sure you would never have to go to war with a dangerous and unpredictable adversary was to go to war with them.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;So the Reagan administration salted papers like the Wall Street Journal and the Washington Post with bogus tales about how Libya was backing new terrorist initiatives. In fact, the CIA had secretly concluded Qaddafi was “quiescent” on the terror front at the time.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Friedman won the Pulitzer Prize for commentary that year. The fact that he declared “the next six months will be critical” fourteen times during the war is much laughed about today, but it’s actually a serious commentary on how long delusions are allowed to persist, provided they’re the right delusions.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;In the blink of an eye, we went from tolerating Saddam Hussein without any trouble at all to needing to kill him immediately in self defense, with people like Brooks insisting that anyone who said otherwise was just refusing to face the irrefutable math.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The only crime is trying to punch above not just your own intellect, but everyone else’s. Many believe Iraq-style collective delusions are less possible today, because the post-Trump universe is so divided. This is a misread of how this all works. If anything, the Church of the Average is stronger than ever. The greater the political stress, the more the public is subjected to even stricter and more ridiculous enforcement of conventional wisdom. We place a great premium today on not thinking for oneself, and not temporarily, so as to green-light one war, but generally — on the grounds that free thinking has not worked out so well for America of late, and therefore must be discouraged.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p><a href="https://taibbi.substack.com/p/the-ten-rules-of-hate-rules-710-the">The Ten Rules of Hate, Rules 7–10</a> by <cite>Matt Taibbi</cite></p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Which headline is the Hawaiian Democrat going to click on first: “Ballast Discharge Measure Won’t Protect Hawaii’s Coastal Waters” or “11 Times Marie Hirono Had Zero Fucks To Give”? Scatological blather scores shares and retweets, and now that there’s no ideological or commercial requirement to avoid pissing off the whole audience – no more “Good morning, everybody” – there’s no disincentive to using the strongest language.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The problem is, there’s no natural floor to this behavior. Just as cable TV will eventually become 700 separate 24-hour porn channels, news and commentary will eventually escalate to boxing-style expletive-laden pre-fight tirades, and open incitement of violence. If the other side is literally Hitler, this eventually has to happen. It would be illogical to argue anything else. What began as America vs. America will eventually move to Traitor vs. Traitor, and the show does not work if those contestants are not offended to the point of wanting to kill one another.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Few think about this, but the press routinely puts the names and personal information of people arrested in newspapers, on TV, and, worst of all, online, where the stories live forever. Yet these people have not been convicted of crimes, merely arrested or charged.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;What’s remarkable about Pauli’s story is how rare it is. Pauli happened to be in one of the worst corners of the game, covering crime, which is a genre significantly wrapped up in needlessly stoking class/racial fears on the one hand, while making people feel superior on the other. But the core dynamic of his job was not much different from what most of us do. We’re mainly in the business of stroking audiences. We want them coming back. Anger is part of the rhetorical promise, but so are feelings righteousness and superiority.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;It’s why we love terrible people like Casey Anthony or O.J. as news subjects a lot more than we’d like someone who spends his or her days working in a pediatric oncology ward. Showing genuinely heroic or selfless people on TV would make most audiences feel inferior. Therefore, we don’t.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;It’s the same premise as reality shows. The most popular programs aren’t about geniuses and paragons of virtue, but instead about terrible parents, morons, people too fat to notice they’re pregnant, people willing to be filmed getting ass tucks, spoiled rich people, and other freaks. Why use the most advanced communications technology in history to teach people basic geography, or how World Bank structural adjustment lending works, when you can instead watch idiots drink donkey semen for money? Your media experience is designed to nurture and protect your ego. So we show you the biggest losers we can find. It’s the underlying principle of almost every successful entertainment product we’ve had, from COPS to Freakshow to, literally, The Biggest Loser. We’re probably just a few years way from a show called, What Would You Suck For a Dollar?&rdquo;</div></blockquote><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;In the early nineties, the Weekly Standard wrote that Republicans wanted Quayle to “dispel his bimbo image” by “showing some teeth, Spiro Agnew style.” Agnew is one of the biggest disgraces in the history of American politics, a blowhard with no discernible ideas beyond the promiscuous use of every conceivable form of political corruption – yet in the American consciousness, he’s not a loser. He’s an aggressor.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;When you look back at the generation of Heathers-style coverage, the evolution toward Trump starts to make sense. We can excuse almost anything in America except losing. And we love a freak show.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;We count on your shame in the same way. We know you know the news we show you is demeaning, disgusting, pointless, and not really intended to inform. But we assume you’ll be too embarrassed to admit you spend hours every day poring through content specifically designed to stroke your point of view. In fact, you’ll consume twice as much rather than admit you don’t like to be challenged. Like Tolstoy’s weak hero, you’ll pay to hide your shame.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;We can’t get you there unless you follow all the rules. Accept a binary world and pick a side. Embrace the reality of being surrounded by evil stupidity, and do not commune with it. Feel indignant, righteous, and smart. Hate losers, love winners. And during the commercials, do some shopping.</p>
<p>&ldquo;Congratulations, you’re the perfect news consumer.&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote><p><a href="https://taibbi.substack.com/p/how-reading-the-news-is-like-smoking">How Reading the News is like Smoking</a></p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;We may be insane monsters inside, but we work hard to have good consumer taste on the surface. Ellis understood that most of us, when we read the news, are really just telling ourselves a story about who we like to think we are, when we look in the mirror.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p><a href="https://taibbi.substack.com/p/all-the-folk-devils-are-here">All the folk devils are here</a> by <cite>Matt Taibbi</cite></p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The constant drumbeat of “It’s the beginning of the end” stories about “bombshells” causing the “walls” to “close in” on Trump – so comic that a mash-up of such comments dating to Trump’s first week in office has gone viral – is a case of straight-up emotional grifting. Editors know Democratic audiences are devastated by the fact of the Trump presidency, so they constantly hint at hope that he’ll be dragged away in handcuffs at any moment. This is despite the fact that reporters know the legal avenues for removal are extraordinarily unlikely.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p><a href="https://taibbi.substack.com/p/buzzfeeds-big-scoop-and-the-medias">BuzzFeed&rsquo;s big scoop and the media&rsquo;s giant factual loophole</a> by <cite>Matt Taibbi</cite> (<cite><a href="http://taibbi.substack.com/">Hate Inc.</a></cite>)</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;So in a world where not just wars but occupations can safely be left out of the news, imagine how the reporting works on individual bombings. There is a lengthy story about how we even have the authority to kill people in countries all across the globe by remote aircraft; those interested can read here. The government as recently as last spring asserted in an American courtroom that it had the right to authorize “lethal action” against even an American citizen without indictment, probable cause, even notice, due to a series of legal loopholes so preposterous they would impress Kafka.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p><a href="https://taibbi.substack.com/p/the-class-taboo">The class taboo</a> by <cite>Matt Taibbi</cite> (<cite><a href="http://taibbi.substack.com/">Hate Inc.</a></cite>)</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Journalism has evolved into a career with significant entry barriers, one of which is the unpaid internship. This makes the profession whiter, wealthier… and less concerned with public policy issues that affect the poor and even the middle class.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">&mdash;<cite>Dana Goldstein</cite> (<cite>The American Prospect</cite>)</div></div><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;This to me was what journalism was supposed to be about, asking why things happen and being willing to be surprised or even upset by the answers. If Democrats could hear hard truths like the ones in What’s the Matter With Kansas? they were in good intellectual health.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The sheer number of articles wondering if Trump’s win suggests there’s “too much democracy” these days conveys more about who is doing the analysis than it does about the political situation. Politicians and journalists alike have absolved themselves of any responsibility for what’s gone wrong, settling instead for endless finger-pointing at people who are just irredeemably stupid and racist – who just “have bad souls,” as Frank puts it. This convenient catchall explanation makes the op-ed page the place where upscale readers go to be reassured they never have to change or examine past policy mistakes, even if it means continuing to lose elections.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>With this kind of crap going at home, Who is the U.S. to judge anyone else&rsquo;s democracy?</p>
<p><a href="https://taibbi.substack.com/p/russiagate-is-wmd-times-a-million">It&rsquo;s official: Russiagate is this generation&rsquo;s WMD</a> by <cite>Matt Taibbi</cite> (<cite><a href="http://taibbi.substack.com/">Hate Inc.</a></cite>)</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Russiagate institutionalized one of the worst ethical loopholes in journalism, which used to be limited mainly to local crime reporting. It’s always been a problem that we publish mugshots and names of people merely arrested but not yet found guilty. Those stories live forever online and even the acquitted end up permanently unable to get jobs, smeared as thieves, wife-beaters, drunk drivers, etc. With Russiagate the national press abandoned any pretense that there’s a difference between indictment and conviction.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;As a purely journalistic failure, however, WMD was a pimple compared to Russiagate. The sheer scale of the errors and exaggerations this time around dwarfs the last mess. Worse, it’s led to most journalists accepting a radical change in mission. We’ve become sides-choosers, obliterating the concept of the press as an independent institution whose primary role is sorting fact and fiction. We had the sense to eventually look inward a little in the WMD affair, which is the only reason we escaped that episode with any audience left. Is the press even capable of that kind of self-awareness now? WMD damaged our reputation. If we don’t turn things around, this story will destroy it.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Nothing Trump is accused of from now by the press will be believed by huge chunks of the population, a group now larger than his original base. As Baker notes, a full 50.3% of respondents in a poll conducted this month said they agree with Trump the Mueller probe is a “witch hunt.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;There was never real gray area here. Either Trump is a compromised foreign agent, or he isn’t. If he isn’t, news outlets once again swallowed a massive disinformation campaign, only this error is many orders of magnitude more stupid than any in the recent past, WMD included.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>More stupid, not worse. People are misrepresenting Taibbi&rsquo;s opinion on this point.</p>
<p><a href="https://taibbi.substack.com/p/the-scarlet-letter-club">The Scarlet Letter Club</a> by <cite>Matt Taibbi</cite> (<cite><a href="http://taibbi.substack.com/">Hate Inc.</a></cite>)</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Kristol argued the United States should seek to be “a leader with preponderant influence and authority over all others in its domain.” With the Soviets gone from the scene, the argument went, our “domain” should now be planet Earth. Securing “authority” meant pursuing policies “ultimately intended to bring about a change of regime” in countries like “Iran, Cuba, and China.” (China!)&rdquo;</div></blockquote><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;When we deride journalists as stenographers, it’s not about them repeating the words of powerful officials. The real crime is absorbing the ideas of powerful people (often crafted by groups of officials in a dreary corporate process) and repeating them as if they’re your own personal thoughts.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Officials have been lying their faces off to the press for a century. From World War I-era tales of striking union workers being German agents, to the “missile gap” that wasn’t (the “gap” was leaked to the press before the Soviets had even one operational ICBM) to the various Gulf of Tonkin deceptions, to the smearing of people like Martin Luther King, it’s a wonder newspapers listen to security sources at all.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Cruelty and monstrousness inherently come wrapped in absurdity, which makes sense, because without conscience or decency, the human animal is just an ape in a hat.&rdquo;</div></blockquote>      </div>
      </div>
        <div class="footer">
    <div class="footer-data"><div class="footer-links"><ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/contact.php" title="">Contact</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/support.php" title="">Support</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/privacy.php" title="">Privacy</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/rights.php" title="">Rights</a></li></ul></div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="copyright">Copyright (c) 1999-2026 earthli.com. All Rights Reserved.</div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="versions">Powered by <ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore/app_news.php">earthli News 3.7</a></li><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore" title="">earthli WebCore&trade; 3.7</a></li></ul></div></div>    </div>
      </div>
  </div>  </body>
</html>
]]>
  </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
      <title type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[Falter by Bill McKibben (2019) (read in 2019)]]>
  </title>
    <id>https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3789</id>
    <link href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3789"/>
    <updated>2019-12-27T17:02:14+01:00</updated>
    <author>
        <name type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[Marco von Ballmoos]]>
  </name>
      <uri>https://earthli.com/users/marco</uri>
    </author>
      <summary type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<blockquote class="quote abstract "><div>Disclaimer: these are notes I took while reading this book. They include citations I found interesting or enlightening or particularly well-written. In some cases, I&rsquo;ve pointed out which of these applies to which citation; in others, I have not. Any benefit you gain from reading these notes is... [<a class="complete-text-link" href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3789">More</a>]</div></blockquote>]]>
  </summary>
      <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<html lang="en">
  <head>
    <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/themes/ice.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/fonts/raleway.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/core/medium.css">
  </head>
  <body>
<div class="style-controls">  <div class="page">
    <div class="page-body">
<div class="info-box-top">
<p>
Published by <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_user.php?name=marco" title="Marco von Ballmoos" class="visible">marco</a> on <span class="date-time">27. Dec 2019 17:02:14 (GMT-5)</span>
</p>
</div>
      <div class="text-flow wide">
  <blockquote class="quote abstract "><div>Disclaimer: these are notes I took while reading this book. They include citations I found interesting or enlightening or particularly well-written. In some cases, I&rsquo;ve pointed out which of these applies to which citation; in others, I have not. Any benefit you gain from reading these notes is purely incidental to the purpose they serve of reminding me what I once read. Please see Wikipedia for a summary if I&rsquo;ve failed to provide one sufficient for your purposes. If my notes serve to trigger an interest in this book, then I&rsquo;m happy for you.</div></blockquote><p>I read this book immediately after having read <em>The Uninhabitable Earth: Life After Warming</em> by <em>David Wallace-Wells</em>. It compares favorably: the prose is easily as appealing, the facts just as eye-opening (many overlap, of course) and the conclusion just a bit more hopeful, in a very specific way.</p>
<p>It&rsquo;s not a false hope, either. McKibben is deadly serious about the facts and their sobering implications. But he also spends a little time being in awe of what mankind has produced, despite how casually we&rsquo;ve burned through resources—or how unevenly we&rsquo;ve distributed benefits—to do so.</p>
<p>He doesn&rsquo;t rubber-stamp these achievements as &ldquo;worth it&rdquo; like so many others (just because he happens to be a in a group that benefits) and he doesn&rsquo;t diminish the evil that was an intrinsic part of how it came to be, but he does take a few minutes to describe it, if only to descry something worth saving. If mankind where to have wasted resources on only a handful of people while subjugating all others to produce total and useless crap, then a logical conclusion would be relatively easy: let it all go. We&rsquo;re done here.</p>
<p>Even more than Wallace-Wells, McKibben points the accusatory finger at a system heavily influenced by the so-called American way of life, represented more recently by high-tech moguls and gurus who own vast swaths of the global economy and are no longer located exclusively in America (though many are in Silicon Valley).</p>
<p>He eloquently describes moments from his many travels. Instead of using numbers describing the tar-sands complex in Alberta, he tells us that <span class="quote-inline">&ldquo;[b]ecause any bird that landed on the filthy water would die, cannons fire day and night to scare them away&rdquo;</span>, which cuts much, much deeper with its layered perversity. Or analogizing that <span class="quote-inline">&ldquo;[t]he extra heat that we trap near the planet because of the carbon dioxide we’ve spewed is equivalent to the heat from 400,000 Hiroshima-sized bombs every day, or four each second.&rdquo;</span> Those facts sink in and don&rsquo;t let go.</p>
<p>As with anyone attempting to inspire action, you have to make a decision on how to deliver the message: do you appeal to basic ethics or decency? Or do you appeal to personal danger?</p>
<p>Anyone arguing against going to war in a foreign country (like Iran) generally skips the first argument, though it&rsquo;s the only one they should have to make. Instead, they end up talking about how hard it would be to defeat Iran, how much it would cost in lives and money and so on. The basic senselessness and immorality of it are quickly deemed as moot because people just don&rsquo;t care.</p>
<p>McKibben must strike a similar balance: he spends a little time discussing just how wrong it is for 1% of the planet&rsquo;s population to doom the other 99% for its own pleasure. But then he switches to the argument that is far more likely to hit home for those 1%: that they won&rsquo;t be safe where they are for much longer. The effects of their behavior will soon affect them and the ones they love <em>in addition to</em> faceless and sub-human foreigners in dusty, squalid countries.</p>
<p>As does Wallace-Wells, McKibben discusses the shape of the global economy and the vast reductions or changes needed in order to combat the climate crisis. Unlike either of those authors, though, I think we should welcome a wholesale reduction of mankind (perhaps back to the population level the world enjoyed when I was born, about 4 billion). We can either do it voluntarily or let Mother Nature kill off slews that can no longer be sustained on a dying planet, watching our unthinking and unquestioning brethren grunt and breed and churn their offspring directly into the meat-grinder of an uncaring climate.</p>
<p>Unique among every other generation of mankind that came before us, we will have the dubious honor of knowing that <span class="quote-inline">&ldquo;the size of the board on which we’re playing the game is going to get considerably smaller […]&rdquo;</span> Given this glaring and undeniable fact, we should really get squared with the notion that we can&rsquo;t defend everywhere, we can&rsquo;t save everything and we shouldn&rsquo;t try.</p>
<p>It&rsquo;s not a matter of money, but a matter of remaining resources. And I don&rsquo;t mean we let people fry where they live; instead, as with cases of eminent domain, we should offer them a luxurious apology package to relocate while we focus our efforts on making wherever we relocate them safe from further climate-based predations. This obviously won&rsquo;t happen, but it would be the right thing to do. We&rsquo;ve grown used to getting what we want, to growing without restriction, and to not having to pay too much for our mistakes.</p>
<p>I fault McKibben in only a few places. One of them is in his treatment of Obama, where he writes,</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;It’s not, at some level, Obama’s fault. He was elected to run a political and economic system based on endless growth. He feared that if he upset it too much he wouldn’t be reelected, which would have done no one any good.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>That&rsquo;s a fucking copout. Obama didn’t get it, and he still doesn’t. He&rsquo;s seen all of the data and he doesn’t care. He should have talked about nothing but climate change. He never mentioned it. He had the chance to rebuild the economy better. He put it back the way it was, but more unequal and more zombified. He didn&rsquo;t even stand up once, not where he would have personally sacrificed something.</p>
<p>Similarly for bloody Trudeau of Canada, who&rsquo;s also lying about caring about climate change. He’s a sociopath like all the rest. He and Obama should not go down in history as climate-change leaders who mysteriously took their countries in the exact opposite direction, despite their best intentions. That’s fatuous bullshit.</p>
<p>But otherwise McKibben savages the right people for the climate crisis, placing blame but also obligation to do something about it on the 1% that benefitted the most. He has a long section on the ideological underpinnings of the 20th century that led to this situation, in particular noting the insidious influence of Ayn Rand&rsquo;s writings (who <span class="quote-inline">&ldquo;might as well have written with a crayon&rdquo;</span>) on the idiotic American Business upper class. After reading through this, I was struck by the thought that Rand may have been the Soviet Union&rsquo;s greatest sleeper agent—talk about playing a long game.</p>
<p>Speaking of the Soviet Union, McKibben lashes out at a country with,</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;[…] its environment wrecked because people couldn’t protest pollution, its people demoralized because they were told what to do with their lives, its official art and literature a dim-witted joke.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>Are you hearing the irony in that statement, Bill? No? A pity. I suppose you are, after all, an American. As he mentioned earlier in the book,</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;[his] naïveté stemmed naturally from the fact that [he] grew up at precisely the moment when America was making huge strides toward reducing inequality, when it seemed that the obvious task was to make our world fairer. I was born in 1960, between the New Deal and the Great Society.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>I guess the whole cold-war mindset was buried a bit too deeply, as well. There are other examples, in quick succession. In another story that immediately followed, he was outside the GUM department store in Moscow where he saw,</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;[…] two long lines of people waiting, […] When the left door opened first, everyone on the right side simply went home: they’d guessed wrong and knew that whatever was for sale would be long gone before they made it inside.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>You have described an Apple store, Bill. You have not in any way described a uniquely Soviet failing. He still wasn&rsquo;t done, though,</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;An industrial society that can’t produce enough children’s coats for the Russian winter—that’s failure on a grand scale.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>His analysis seems to be entirely without self-reflection or ironic sense. He delivers these anecdotes complete devoid of any analysis of the economic war waged on the USSR by a rapacious, pitiless, and amoral power (the U.S.). He utterly fails to not even mention the same, or worse, level of failure in America since Reagan. The depth of anti-communism and Russophobia in the U.S. is so staggering that it rears its ugly head even in the most otherwise carefully researched book.</p>
<p>Finishing up with Rand, he discusses the central tenet of <em>Atlas Shrugged</em>—which so many of America&rsquo;s political leaders have taken to heart—that the smart and strong will always have to put up with moochers. The reason it&rsquo;s so appealing is that it&rsquo;s not wrong. There <em>are</em> moochers. There are nearly utterly useless people, unsuited to not only the purpose for which they are employed or invest themselves, but for anything. Dumb, lazy, bored, depressed, untrainable: it doesn’t matter; someone else has to cover for their needs.</p>
<p>The conceit lies in the idea that the dividing line between the groups of productive and unproductive runs right along rich/poor (or black/white or whatever). The problem with Rand&rsquo;s philosophy is that it doesn&rsquo;t account for good or bad luck or drastically staggered starting blocks. It doesn&rsquo;t account for moochers who were &ldquo;born on third and think they hit a triple.&rdquo;</p>
<p>The true moochers are ladder-climbers, middle management and greedy bosses, sitting on the necks of the productive, bleeding them dry. Those with ability should be looking <em>up</em> for moochers, not down, as Rand instructed them.</p>
<p>McKibben sums up how this whole philosophy relates to climate change.</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Once the Arctic melts, there’s no way to freeze it back up again, not in human time. The particular politics of one country for one fifty-year period will have rewritten the geological history of the earth, and crimped the human game.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>In a dark mood, it might strike one as a delicious irony that humanity will have been killed by a parasitic meme—a parasite so stupid that it kills its host. A poisonous and selfish worldview leads to rapacious and immoral individualism leads to lying about climate change to protect business leads to inundation and extinction. Well done. With a whimper indeed. Humanity gets a fucking Darwin Award.</p>
<p>The next section of the book gets more optimistic, discussing germ-line editing and cybernetics. I&rsquo;m not convinced that&rsquo;s going to help. But it&rsquo;s not like we&rsquo;re going to stop breeding, because that’s obviously not an option. Instead, we&rsquo;re totally going to let the rich edit germlines, so even more people can viably breed.</p>
<p>He even gets to Stephen Pinker (who Wallace-Wells also discussed), who he cites as writing that artificial intelligence is <span class="quote-inline">&ldquo;like any other technology […] tested before it is implemented and constantly tweaked for safety and efficacy.&rdquo;</span> Sweet God, the naiveté. It&rsquo;s like he doesn&rsquo;t even live on the same planet. That is absolutely the <em>opposite</em> of how we introduce technology. We have much more of a &ldquo;throw shit on the wall and see what sticks&rdquo; approach, which is marvelously suited to AI—which may end up sticking very well, indeed, whether we like it or not.</p>
<p>After Pinker, cue Kurzweil, who McKibben knows and who he cites about death, <span class="quote-inline">&ldquo;If someone dies, our immediate reaction—it’s considered a tragic thing, not a triumphant thing.&rdquo;</span> I think this infantile, stunted and uniquely western philosophy is fucking ruining everything again by inventing and promulgating so-called needs. A life well-lived can absolutely be triumphant. Lingering on is embarrassing. Kurzweil and his ilk suffer from a surfeit of ego. I’m happy as I am. What&rsquo;s the point of starting over again later, almost certainly completely unadapted for my new life? To whose benefit? Let it go, Ray. Life mattered and matters little, even the first time through.</p>
<p>However, I don&rsquo;t agree with the critique that Kurzweil&rsquo;s philosophy is bad because it <span class="quote-inline">&ldquo;limit[s] new entrants to the human race&rdquo;</span>. I don’t share McKibben’s and society’s seeming preference for the young or unborn. How is a philosophy that favors future generations morally better ? If people become immortal, then we either need a lot more room or we need fewer entrants. It’s logic. We need fewer entrants as well if resources dwindle, as they will.</p>
<p>He finally gets to his pièce de resistance: the solar-power market, which he manages to finally put into terms that look quite hopeful, even to me. Here&rsquo;s the money shot:</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The manufacturing process for solar panels has become so efficient that the panels pay back the energy used to make them in less than four years. Since they last three decades, that means a quarter-century of pollution-free operation.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>Will we be allowed to have this thing? Not if the powers-that-be have anything to say about it. They all benefit from sunken investments in infrastructure—subsidies over nearly a century of decades—that continue today. They&rsquo;re lying about catastrophic downsides to their own energy sources and torpedoing alternatives that are not personally lucrative but would be better for everyone else.</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;That’s why Exxon hates solar: you put up a solar panel and the energy comes for free, which to the corporate mind is the stupidest business plan ever.) The cash you spend for energy stays close to home; there’s no way for the Koch brothers to become our richest and most powerful citizens simply by shipping fuel hither and yon.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>With all of this tech talk, McKibben returns to asking whether we&rsquo;re not already good enough, circling back to the initial theme of asking what is uniquely worth saving about humanity? He discusses resistance and never giving up, even in the face of horrible odds. He wonders again whether we shouldn&rsquo;t just be happy with what we&rsquo;ve got, <span class="quote-inline">&ldquo;Given that there’s no finishing line to the human game, no obvious goal toward which we are racing, then why exactly are we so intent on constantly speeding up?&rdquo;</span></p>
<p>I think it&rsquo;s an important book that asks the right questions and delivers a tremendous amount of vital information in an interesting, well-written and, at times, poignant read. He strikes the right balance between science and philosophy—because it&rsquo;s the deficit of the latter that aided the former in running roughshod over us all. I&rsquo;ll let McKibben have his eloquent last word.</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;But if the bird’s special gift is flight, ours is the possibility of restraint. We’re the only creature who can decide not to do something we’re capable of doing. That’s our superpower, even if we exercise it too rarely.</p>
<p>&ldquo;So, yes, we can wreck the Earth as we’ve known it, killing vast numbers of ourselves and wiping out entire swaths of other life—in fact, as we’ve seen, we’re doing that right now. But we can also not do that.&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote><h2>Citations</h2><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;I write, for instance, I’m listening to Orchestra Baobab on Spotify. It was the house band at a Dakar nightclub in the 1970s, where its music reflected the Cuban beats that came with sailors to West Africa in the 1940s; eventually the group recorded its best album at a Paris studio, and now it somehow resides on a computer server where 196,847 people from across the planet listen to it each month. Try to parse the play of history and technology and commerce and spirituality and swing that make up the sound pouring into my headphones—the colonialisms layered on top of one another; the questions of race, identity, pop, purity.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 9</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;But I think it’s best to begin by stressing not the shakiness of the human game but, instead, its stability. For humans, all of us together, have built something remarkable, something we rarely stand back and simply acknowledge. The sum of the projects of our individual lives, the total of the institutions and enterprises we have created, the aggregate of our wishes and dreams and labors, the entirety of our ceaseless activity—it is a wonder.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 10</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Dignity, in the context of the human game, can be measured in many ways: enough calories, freedom from fear, clothes to wear, useful work.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 10</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Women, with more education and at least a modicum of equality, have gone from having more than five kids apiece on average in 1970 to having fewer than two and a half today, probably the most rapid and remarkable demographic change the planet has ever witnessed.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 10</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;On his way to the theoretically groundbreaking Rio environmental summit in 1992, the first President Bush famously declared, “The American way of life is not up for negotiation,” and as it turns out, he was correct—and speaking for much of the world. And so far, we’ve gotten away with it: even as we keep accelerating, the game spins on.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 14</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;And as we shall see, because of the radical inequality we’ve allowed to overtake our society, the key decisions have been and will be made by a handful of humans in a handful of places: oil company executives in Houston, say, and tech moguls in Silicon Valley and Shanghai. Particular people in particular places at a particular moment in time following a particular philosophic bent: that’s leverage piled on top of leverage. And their ability to skew our politics with their wealth is one more layer of leverage. It scares me.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 16</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;To walk the roads through even a corner of Alberta’s vast tar sands complex is to visit a kind of hell. This may be the largest industrial complex on our planet—the largest dam on Earth holds back one of the many vast settling “ponds,” where sludge from the mines combines with water and toxic chemicals in a black soup. Because any bird that landed on the filthy water would die, cannons fire day and night to scare them away.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 18</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The extra heat that we trap near the planet because of the carbon dioxide we’ve spewed is equivalent to the heat from 400,000 Hiroshima-sized bombs every day, or four each second.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 22</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;[…] marvel at the magnitude: the extra carbon released to date, if it could be amassed in one place, would form a solid graphite column twenty-five meters in diameter that would stretch from here to the moon.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 22</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Nora Gallagher again: “Climate believers, climate deniers, deep in our hearts we think it will happen somewhere else. In some other place—we don’t actually say this but we may think it—in a poorer one, say, Puerto Rico or New Orleans or Cape Town or one of those islands where the sea level is rising. Or it will happen in some other time, in 2025 or 2040 or next year. But we are here to tell you, in this postcard from the former paradise, that it won’t happen next year, or somewhere else. It will happen right where you live and it could happen today. No one will be spared.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 33</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;A four-degree increase—which is where our current trajectory will take us—would cut the crop almost in half. The United States is the world’s largest producer of corn, which in turn is the planet’s most widely grown crop.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 37</div></div><p>Flip: cut the population in half and problem solved.  I think these authors express horror at the reduction of mankind, at a loss of ground gained. I welcome it.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;India alone could lose 5 percent of the protein in its total diet, putting 53 million people at new risk for protein deficiency. The loss of zinc, essential for maternal and infant health, could endanger 138 million people around the world.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 38</div></div><p>I&rsquo;m not sure we have to worry about mineral deficiencies in people who are going to drown anyway.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;A team of economists predicted a 12 percent risk that global warming could reduce global economic output by 50 percent by 2100—that is to say, there’s a one-in-eight chance of something eight times as bad as the Great Recession.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 42</div></div><p>We don&rsquo;t learn lessons that don&rsquo;t hurt.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Privilege lies in obliviousness. (White privilege, for instance, involves being able to reliably forget that race matters.) One of the great privileges of living in the affluent parts of the modern world is that we’ve been able to forget that the natural world even exists. In our lifetimes, and the lifetimes of our parents, it’s served mostly as a backdrop. A subdivision is named for what used to be there: Fox Ridge. A suburb is designed to hide the natural world: where, amid the curving streets, are the creeks?&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 55</div></div><p>In fairness to some regions, like Switzerland, this is a uniquely Americanized approach to residential living.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Life as we know it won’t suddenly end, but it will be crimped; in many places, it already is. To use our metaphor, the size of the board on which we’re playing the game is going to get considerably smaller, and this may be the single most remarkable fact of our time on earth.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 56</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Many of us descend from Europeans who, fed up with the crowded conditions and religious strictures of the Old World, came to a new one. Upon arrival, they slaughtered or pushed aside the people already inhabiting this continent, and then imported boatloads of human chattel to do much of the work of building the “New World.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 56</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Our world has been broadening for centuries, and that broadening is, to a large degree, what we think of as normal and ordinary: if the economy doesn’t grow larger each year, we now suffer as a result, because our systems, and our expectations, have become dependent on that growth.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 58</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;But that 2 percent of the surface contains 10 percent of the people, and generates 10 percent of the gross world product.21 And it’s not defensible, not most of it—no one is going to pay to build a seawall around the Bengali coast; or to defend Accra, the capital of Ghana, which already floods during storms. “On the outskirts of Lomé, the capital of Togo, rows of destroyed buildings line the beaches,” Jeff Goodell reports.22 Anyone want to estimate how much money the world is likely to spend defending the capital of Togo?&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 62</div></div><p>We should retreat everywhere. Don&rsquo;t waste money or effort defending.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Orrin Pilkey wrote in 2016. “Our retreat options can be characterized as either difficult or catastrophic. We can plan now and retreat in a strategic and calculated fashion, or we can worry about it later and retreat in tactical disarray in response to devastating storms. In other words, we can walk away methodically, or we can flee in panic.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 62</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;California’s snowpack keeps dwindling as hot, dry years pile up; the state faces a drop of as much as 70 or 80 percent in its water supply.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 63</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Lots of people already hesitate to walk across a grassy meadow because hot weather has spread ticks bearing Lyme disease. On plenty of beaches, people now sit stranded on the sand because jellyfish, which thrive as warming seas kill off other marine life, have taken over the waves.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 64</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;It’s not, at some level, Obama’s fault. He was elected to run a political and economic system based on endless growth. He feared that if he upset it too much he wouldn’t be reelected, which would have done no one any good.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 69</div></div><p>Fucking copout. He didn&rsquo;t get it, he still doesn&rsquo;t get it. He doesn&rsquo;t care. He should have talked about nothing but climate change. He never mentioned it. He had the chance to rebuild the economy better. He put it back the way it was, but more unequal and more zombified.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;And yet, Trudeau’s country contains one of the two largest deposits of tar sands on earth, that vast swath of Northern Alberta that can, at great cost to water and forest, be mined for sludgy oil. And Trudeau refuses to slow its expansion.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 69</div></div><p>Which means he&rsquo;s lying about caring about climate change. He&rsquo;s a sociopath like all the rest. He and Obama should not go down in history as climate-change leaders who mysteriously and despite their best intentions took.their countries in the exact opposite direction. That&rsquo;s fatuous bullshit.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Like so many politicians, he turned out to be unwilling to relinquish the power that oil represents. In the spring of 2017, Trudeau told a cheering group of Houston oilmen that “no country would find 173 billion barrels of oil in the ground and just leave them there.” And yet, just leaving them there is exactly what he’d have to do if he were even slightly serious about taming climate change. If we burn that 173 billion barrels of oil, the carbon dioxide will take us 30 percent of the way to the 1.5 degree target that Trudeau had insisted on in Paris. That is, one nation with one-half of 1 percent of the planet’s population is laying claim to a third of the atmospheric space between us and disaster.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 69</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;As early as 1959, at a symposium called “Energy and Man,” organized by the American Petroleum Institute to mark the centenary of the global oil business, the physicist Edward Teller told the industry’s most important executives, “Carbon dioxide has a strange property. It transmits visible light but it absorbs the infrared radiation which is emitted from the earth.” The temperature, Teller predicted, would rise, and when it did, “there is a possibility that the icecaps will start melting and the level of the oceans will begin to rise.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 73</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;We know that Exxon executives took these warnings seriously. Internal documents show that the company (and other oil giants) built their new oil drilling platforms with higher decks to compensate for the sea level rise they now knew was coming. In the Arctic, a team assigned to investigate the effects of warming concluded that “global warming can only help lower exploration and development costs” in the Beaufort Sea.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 74</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;My naïveté stemmed naturally from the fact that I grew up at precisely the moment when America was making huge strides toward reducing inequality, when it seemed that the obvious task was to make our world fairer. I was born in 1960, between the New Deal and the Great Society. My childhood featured the civil rights movement and the women’s movement. I thought that was what politics was about. The year I graduated from high school, 1978, was the year the top 1 percent of Americans saw their share of the nation’s wealth fall to 23 percent. Which, as it turned out, was as low as it would ever go. Since then, the wealthy’s share of the take has doubled. CEOs made less than 20 times as much as the average worker when I was born; now they make 295 times as much.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 84</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Within days of the UN special rapporteur’s report on extreme American poverty, the U.S. Congress responded by passing a massive tax cut that virtually every economist predicted would make that inequality much worse. As the UN expert noted in his official report to the world body, “The strategy seems to be tailor-made to maximize inequality.… It seems driven by contempt, and sometimes even hatred, for the poor, along with a ‘winner-takes-all’ mentality.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 86</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;In 2016, Alan Krueger, the former chairman of the president’s Council of Economic Advisers, released a study showing that half the prime working-age men who’d dropped out of the labor force were taking pain medication daily. They were also, on average, watching screens of one kind or another forty hours a week, as if it were a full-time job.16 That’s life for a great many people in the richest, and most unequal, society the world has ever built.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 88</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The kind of capitalism turning America into a creepy jungle is very different: call it laissez-faire, or neoliberalism, or “getting government out of the way,” or being “corporate-friendly.” Whatever you call it, it’s a particularly rapacious variant that’s causing our current problem, one that’s worth careful study.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 89</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;This ideological energy needs to be understood. Something else has happened here, alongside profit-seeking and race-baiting. Some of us have come, in short order, to have a very different sense of what it means to be a person. Basic human solidarity has, especially for the most powerful among us, been replaced by a very different idea.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 89</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;At one level, that’s nonsense. Rand might as well have written with a crayon; her ideas about the world are simple-minded, one-dimensional, and poisonous. But you don’t need to be right to be influential. Her books animated many of the people who dominated American politics at crucial moments. When the United States was occupying the role of superpower, charting the course for a planet, she was occupying the hearts and minds of many of its most powerful people.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 90</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Rand had not done it by herself—as we shall see, there were other, far more systematic thinkers working the same ground, and far more diligent and effective political organizers—but she had told a story that made enough emotional sense to enough people at the top of the heap that it helped reshape the workings of her adopted nation.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 100</div></div><p>She was the Soviet Union&rsquo;s greatest agent.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;[…] its environment wrecked because people couldn’t protest pollution, its people demoralized because they were told what to do with their lives, its official art and literature a dim-witted joke.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 100</div></div><p>I can never tell if Americans can hear the irony in what they&rsquo;re saying. McKibben should have quit while he was ahead.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;I remember standing with my wife outside Moscow’s most prestigious retail outlet, the vast GUM department store. There were two long lines of people waiting, one outside the left door and one outside the right. When the left door opened first, everyone on the right side simply went home: they’d guessed wrong and knew that whatever was for sale would be long gone before they made it inside.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 101</div></div><p>You are describing an Apple store, Mr. McKibben.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;An industrial society that can’t produce enough children’s coats for the Russian winter—that’s failure on a grand scale.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 101</div></div><p>Let&rsquo;s just go ahead and analyze that anecdote complete devoid of the economic war waged on it by a rapacious, pitiless, and amoral power. Also, let&rsquo;s not even mention the exact same level (or worse) of failure in America.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;the tiny group of men who are his economic peers have come to dominate our political life, making precisely the choices that may cut short the human game. And their language is always the same: the “producers,” the “creators,” the “people of value” are threatened by the mob. And so, they must organize and fight. Most of them aren’t quite as blatant or as public as Perkins, who a month after his “Kristallnacht” letter told an audience that, in his ideal world, “you don’t get the vote if you don’t pay a dollar in taxes. But what I really think is it should be like a corporation. You pay a million dollars, you get a million votes.” Still, in essence, they’re thinking just like him.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 103</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Just to be clear: I’m arguing that a systematic idea about the world emerged in the latter half of the twentieth century, an idea as potent in its way as Leninism had been in the first half. This idea (that government was bad, and that productive individuals and their corporations needed to be freed from its clutches) changed the politics of America,&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 103</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;This belief, that they were being unfairly taxed to support the lazy, was at the core not just of their politics but of their emotional worldview. When Charles Koch decided to get married, he insisted that his wife be “indoctrinated with these ideas, lest their marriage lack harmony of purpose.” The wedding couldn’t take place until this “intense training” had succeeded, which apparently didn’t take too long: Elizabeth Koch was soon complaining that America had become “a country of non-risk-takers,” the sort of people “who just want to be coddled and taken care of.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 107</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;As Galt explains to a supposedly fascinated nation, “The man at the top of the intellectual pyramid contributes the most to all those below him, but gets nothing except his material payment, receiving no intellectual bonus from others to add to the value of his time. The man at the bottom who, left to himself, would starve in his hopeless ineptitude, contributes nothing to those above him but receives the bonus of all their brains.… Such is the pattern of exploitation for which you have damned the strong.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 98</div></div><p>This is not 100% wrong. It&rsquo;s incomplete. There are moochers. There are nearly utterly useless people, unsuited to not only the purpose for which they employed or invest themselves, but for anything. Dumb, lazy, bored, depressed, untrainable: it doesn&rsquo;t matter; someone else has to cover for your needs. The conceit lies in the idea that the dividing line between these groups is rich/poor.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Even in corporate life, it turns out, those who “offer assistance, share valuable knowledge, or make valuable introductions” turn out to be far more useful for a business than those who “try to get other people to serve their ends while carefully guarding their own expertise and time,” according to the Harvard Business Review.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 113</div></div><p>Exactly. Because the true moochers are ladder-climbers, middle management and greedy bosses, sitting on the necks of the productive, bleeding them dry.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;In truth, this crudeness seems to affect most deeply those who study economics: researchers found that third-year students in economics rated altruistic values such as helpfulness, honesty, and loyalty as far less important than freshmen&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 115</div></div><p>Humanity will have been killed by a parasitic meme. Killing the host, indeed. A poisonous and selfish worldview leads to rapacious and immoral individualism leads to lying about climate change to protect business leads to inundation and extinction. Well done. With a whimper indeed. Humanity gets a fucking Darwin Award.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Nuclear war with Germany might have been leverage enough to fundamentally and permanently alter the globe.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 118</div></div><p>Instead, capitalism won and we did it anyway, but (relatively) more slowly. As outlined earlier, the acceleration in the eighties and nineties was made possible by fortunes won by procuring for the Nazis. Prescott Bush, Fred Trump, Papa Koch.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;And again, the people who were telling the lies knew they were lies. This wasn’t a hard conspiracy to organize—just one hundred firms in the fossil fuel industry account for 70 percent of the planet’s emissions. But it wasn’t based on simple greed, either. Self-interest mixed perfectly with ideology. Remember the CEOs gleefully handing one another copies of Atlas Shrugged and the billionaires who had grown up in the fever swamps of the antigovernment movement? These guys thought they had cracked the code of history. Climate change was, for them, inconceivable because it would get in the way of profits—the Koch brothers run enormous pipeline networks; they are among the biggest leaseholders in Canada’s tar sands—but also because it marred the purity of their belief system.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 118</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The antigovernment forces had, at some level, no choice but to deny global warming, because tackling it would have required governments to take strong action—at the very least, to set a price on carbon so that markets could then work their putative magic.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 119</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Eventually, North Carolina decided that it would ban state policy makers from using scientific estimates of sea level rise in the coastal planning process.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 122</div></div><p>Smort.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;I remember, way back in 2004, interviewing Senator John McCain, who had decided that global warming was a crucial challenge. “I do believe that Americans, and we who are policy makers in all branches of government, should be concerned about mounting evidence that indicates that something is happening,” he said, and he convened hearings on climate science that led to a modest bill. It lost 55–43, but it seemed like a start. “The race is on,” he told me. “Are we going to have significant climate change and all its consequences, or are we going to try to do something early on? Right now, I don’t think we’re going to act soon enough without significant degradation of our environment. I hope I’m wrong.” He was, of course, not wrong—in fact, after a Koch-backed Tea Party challenger came after him, McCain himself started blasting away at those he’d once agreed with. When Secretary of State John Kerry called climate change a “weapon of mass destruction,” McCain responded, “On what planet does he reside?” By 2014, when McCain made that sneering jape, only 8 of 278 Republicans in Congress were still willing to acknowledge that man-made climate change was real, much less do anything about it.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 122</div></div><p>I was hopeful, but then the real McCain came out, in the end.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The Paris Agreement had been essentially voluntary anyway—the rest of the world had given up on negotiating a real treaty because they saw, after the Kyoto talks in the 1990s, that the power of the fossil fuel industry meant that the U.S. Senate would never muster the two-thirds vote needed to ratify a treaty. Hence, international diplomats knew the best they could hope for at Paris was a set of pledges, and even those were nowhere near rigorous enough to meet the targets they set of holding the planet’s temperature increase below two degrees Celsius.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 126</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;It’s not that we’ll never have a world that runs on sun and wind. We will—free energy is hard to beat, and seventy-five years from now that’s what we’ll use—but if we tarry along the way, that wind and sun will be powering a badly broken planet. These men happened to be in a place where they could use their power to slow us down precisely at the moment when we needed to speed up, at the moment when one more burst of carbon would break the planet. And so, they’ve become permanently powerful. Millennia after they’ve lost the ideological fights, the sea level will still be rising. They’ve scrawled their names into geological history, ugly graffiti that scientists will be deciphering millions of years into the future (assuming there are scientists). Many of the same people managed to cripple Obamacare, too, which is a tragedy—it means lots of people will suffer unnecessarily and die. But when eventually our politics escapes their grip, it won’t be impossible to build a health care system like those in all the other nations of the world. Climate change is different. Once the Arctic melts, there’s no way to freeze it back up again, not in human time. The particular politics of one country for one fifty-year period will have rewritten the geological history of the earth, and crimped the human game. That’s what leverage looks like.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 127</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;This time that’s not a problem, given that the big new brain is external: “My thesis is we’re going to do it again, by the 2030s. We’ll have a synthetic neocortex in the cloud. We’ll connect our brains to the cloud just the way your smartphone is connected now. We’ll become funnier and smarter and able to more effectively express ourselves. We’ll create forms of expression we can’t imagine today, just as the other primates can’t really understand music.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 135</div></div><p>For a select few. Again. And it will be bullshit. Again.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The first category, as I’ve said, is called somatic genetic engineering; this second approach usually travels under the name of “germline” genetic engineering, because the germ line consists of those cells that pass on their traits in the course of reproduction. You could also call it heritable genetic modification. “Now, for the first time ever,” says Doudna, we possess the power to “direct the evolution of our own species. This is unprecedented in the history of life on earth. It is beyond our comprehension.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 143</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;She had shifted her thinking, she said, after reading letters from people with genetic disease in their family. She’d received one just the other day, from a mother with a son diagnosed with a neurodegenerative disease. “He was this adorable little baby, he was in his little carrier and so cute,” she recalled. “I have a son and my heart just broke.… And you think, if there were a way to help these people, we should do it. It would be wrong not to.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 144</div></div><p>Or you could stop breeding, FFS. But that&rsquo;s obviously not an option. Instead, we should totally edit germlines, so even more people can viably breed.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;“Since the wealthy would be able to afford the procedure more often,” Doudna points out, “and since any beneficial genetic modifications made to an embryo would be transmitted to all of that person’s offspring, linkages between class and genetics would ineluctably grow from one generation to the next, no matter how small the disparity in access might be.” (She’s generously considering how this will play out “in countries with comprehensive health-care systems,” which is a polite way of saying “not America.”) “If you think our world is unequal now,” she adds, “just imagine it stratified along both socioeconomic and genetic lines.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 152</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Genetics plays a part in determining who we are and how our lives proceed, but as Nathaniel Comfort, a professor of the history of biology at Johns Hopkins, points out, “Decent, affordable housing; access to real food, education, and transportation; and reducing exposure to crime and violence are far more important.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 153</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;If we wanted to somehow engineer better humans, we’d start by engineering their neighborhoods and schools, not their genes. But, of course, that’s not politically plausible in the world we currently inhabit, the world where “there is no such thing as society. There are just individuals.” If there are just individuals, that’s where you start and end.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 154</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;“It is hard to overestimate what it will be able to do, and impossible to know what it will think,” James Barrat writes in a book with the telling title Our Final Invention. “It does not have to hate us before choosing to use our molecules for a purpose other than keeping us alive.” As he points out, we don’t particularly hate field mice, but every hour of every day we plow under millions of their dens to make sure we have supper.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 159</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;You’ll be pleased to know that not everyone is worried. Steven Pinker ridicules fears of “digital apocalypse,” insisting that “like any other technology,” artificial intelligence is “tested before it is implemented and constantly tweaked for safety and efficacy.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 160</div></div><p>Well, that&rsquo;s a stupid faith to have. Sweet God, the naiveté. It&rsquo;s like he&rsquo;s never used technology before.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;I’ve said before that I think there are better and worse ways to play this game—it’s most stylish and satisfying when more people find ways to live with more dignity—but I think the game’s only real goal is to continue itself.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 163</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;I love Vermont’s local stock car track (“Thunder Road, the nation’s site of excitement!”) because the men and women at the wheel show skill and courage. But I don’t think I’d bother going if the races were run by driverless cars. They could doubtless go faster, just as runners genetically altered to have more red blood cells can doubtless go faster. But faster isn’t really the point. The story is the point. If something as marginal (though wonderful) as sports can see meaning leach away when we mess with people’s bodies or remove them from the picture, perhaps we should think long and hard about more important kinds of meaning. The human game, after all, requires us to be human.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 166</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Rebelling against the wishes and hopes of your parents is how a great many of us define who we are. It may be hard, and it may be painful, and some people may never manage it. And some never need to, because their parents were wise and gentle enough to help them down a congenial path. But it’s not impossible. Whereas, the point of CRISPR, if used for germline engineering of embryos, would be to replace chance with design. Because the parents would no longer be playing the odds, and because no child can rebel against a protein.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 168</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;But those modified grandchildren will also no longer be really related to their future. They’ll be marooned on an island in time, in a way that no human being has ever been before or will be again. When we engineer and design, we turn people into a form of technology, and obsolescence is an utterly predictable feature of every technology we’ve ever seen. For a few years, you’re more useful than any humans who’ve ever come before, and then you’re more useless.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 170</div></div><p>Sort of like the replicants in Blade Runner. Once again, Philip K. Dick went there first.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;That’s our great task as human beings, and now it can’t really be done. She’s feeling happy and optimistic? Is that because of some event, some new idea of herself—or is it because she’s been constructed to feel that way? How would one know? Every journey of self-discovery would end, ultimately, in the design specs from the fertility clinic.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 171</div></div><p>But we&rsquo;re already like that because of genetics. We have a greater illusion of control, but depression might already be programmed.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Yes, like all of us, she is a creature of her genes, but at least those genes weren’t designed to produce a certain outcome. It’s one thing to understand that you are who you are in part because of your genes; it’s another to understand that you were specifically engineered for a certain outcome. The randomness of our current genetic inheritance allows each of us a certain mental freedom from determinism, but that freedom disappears the day we understand ourselves to be, in essence, a product.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 171</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;And so, it should therefore sting the Kurzweils of the world to grasp that you can’t make a more realized human being by giving him extra talent. The greatest cross-country skier on earth doesn’t get more out of a race than I do, even if he finishes it in half the time. As long as I’m fully engaged, the world drops away—and the point is the world dropping away.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 173</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Flow doesn’t increase if you have more ability; it simply requires challenge sufficient to your ability. We are already capable of being as absorbed and engaged as we ever could be. We’re good enough.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 173</div></div><p>That&rsquo;s been my philosophy for decades. I want to be amused and challenge myself.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;[…] inevitably take over simply because it takes a neuron a second to send a message a foot in our brains, while an electron can speed along a foot of wire in a nanosecond. “It’s a million times faster, simple as that,”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 175</div></div><p>Something is wrong with the numbers there.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;But why couldn’t computers produce “better” art than people? They can, after all, analyze what we like and then reproduce it. Already there are AIs that compose Bach-like cantatas that fool concert hall audiences, and the auction house Christie’s sold its first piece of art created by artificial intelligence in the fall of 2018. But at a deeper level, that’s not even how art works. The point of art is not “better”; the point is to reflect on the experience of being human—which is precisely the thing that’s disappearing.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 178</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Partly, it’s money, the great magnetic attraction that ensures the motion never ceases. Whatever business you’re in, its future success depends on mastering these new technologies. Capitalism played by its current rules doesn’t allow anyone to step easily aside.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 179</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Ray Kurzweil takes a hundred pills a day, the better to ward off aging long enough for his peers to figure out how to guarantee he’ll never die. That’s not particularly unusual behavior among the tech elite—it’s easy to find people taking resveratrol, or off-label diabetes medications.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 182</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;His father, Fredric, died when Ray was young, and the son has filled a storage locker with boxes of his effects (letters, photos, even electric bills), in the hope of someday creating “a virtual avatar of his father and then populating the doppelganger’s mind with all this information.”15 So he can talk with him again, father to son. “I do think death is a tragedy,” Kurzweil told me. “That’s our immediate reaction to it. If someone dies, our immediate reaction—it’s considered a tragic thing, not a triumphant thing.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 186</div></div><p>This is infantile, stunted and uniquely western philosophy fucking ruining everything again by inventing and promulgating so-called needs. A life well-lived can absolutely be triumphant. Lingering on is embarrassing. Kurzweil and his ilk suffer from a surfeit of ego. I&rsquo;m happy as I am. Whats the point of starting over later? Possibly and almost certainly completely unadapted for my new life. To whose benefit? Let it go. It mattered and matters little, even the first time through.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;West, who organized the first effort to isolate human stem cells for cloning purposes, was once asked whether immortality wouldn’t lead to overpopulation. Sure, he said, but “why put the burden on people now living, people enjoying the process of breathing, people loving and being loved. The answer is clearly to limit new entrants to the human race, not to promote the death of those enjoying the gift of life today.”16 That level of selfishness makes Ayn Rand look like Mother Teresa.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 187</div></div><p>Why is that? I don&rsquo;t share McKibben&rsquo;s and society&rsquo;s seeming preference for the young or unborn. How is a philosophy that favors future generations morally better ? If people become immortal, then we either need a lot more room or we need fewer entrants. It&rsquo;s logic. We need fewer entrants as well if resources dwindle, as they will.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Resistance is a subject I take up with some reluctance, because I know at least a little bit about its costs. I’ve spent much of the past thirty years as a volunteer in the fight against global warming. We’ve had more successes than I imagined we would, some of which I will describe in passing, but we have yet to turn the tide: the power of people is not yet mobilized in sufficient strength to outweigh the financial majesty of the fossil fuel industry, and so we continue down an ever-hotter path.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 191</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;There’s something deeper at work here, too, though. This is the kind of choice that, to a society, isn’t a choice at all. Once substantial numbers of people engage in genetic engineering, it will become effectively mandatory. Not by government diktat, but by the powerful forces of competition, as the possibility of improving your kids sets off a genetic arms race.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 194</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;If “Let anyone do what they want” is a flawed argument, then “No one can stop them anyway” is an infuriating one. Insisting that some horror is inevitable no matter what you do is the response of people who don’t want to be bothered trying to stop it, and I’ve heard it too often to take it entirely seriously.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 195</div></div><p>No, it&rsquo;s absolutely not. I can&rsquo;t fathom how he can think after getting bitch-slapped for thirty years.  believing that you will lose doesn&rsquo;t mean you don&rsquo;t try anyway.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;We don’t know yet precisely how it will end, only that giving them a pass because of their power makes no sense.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 196</div></div><p>It&rsquo;s not fair to us all together: cynics and realists.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;We shouldn’t let biologists and engineers decide whether and how to deploy these technologies, any more than we should let physicists decide where to drop nuclear weapons or let petroleum geologists decide how many wells to drill. They have special insight into how to do these things, but not into whether doing these things makes sense. When the effects of a decision will fall on the entire society, then entire societies should get to make the call.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 199</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Left to themselves, he insists, democracies can’t solve climate change, “for in order to do so a majority of their voters must support the adoption of substantial restrictions on their excessively consumerist lifestyle, and there is no indication they would be willing to make such sacrifices.”19 Also, our ingrained suspicion of outsiders keeps us from working together globally.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 201</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;[…] makers of solar saw the price begin to drop—indeed, the steady decline has taken solar power from a hundred dollars a watt in the 1960s to less than thirty cents a watt by 2018, making it the cheapest way to generate electricity across most of the world.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 204</div></div><p>It&rsquo;s very important to know how these number are calculated.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;“This is great,” the man says. “I know you’re trying to help us. I just don’t have the money. Life is hard, things are expensive, sometimes we’re hungry.” Max nods, helpful. “What if I gave you a way to pay for it, so the dollar wouldn’t even come from your pocket. If you get a system, people will pay you to charge their phones. Or, if you had a TV, you could charge people to come watch the football games.” “I couldn’t charge a person for coming in to watch a game,” the man says. “We’re all one big family. If someone is wealthy enough to have a TV, everyone is welcome to it.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 208</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;It’s not that renewable energy is our only task. We also need to eat lower on the food chain, build public transit networks, densify cities, and start farming in ways that restore carbon to soils. But renewable energy may be the easiest of these tasks, especially since it’s suddenly so cheap. The manufacturing process for solar panels has become so efficient that the panels pay back the energy used to make them in less than four years. Since they last three decades, that means a quarter-century of pollution-free operation.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 211</div></div><p>Thank you!</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Nearby, in Warren, Michigan, the U.S. Army built a tank factory faster than it could build the power plant to run it—so it simply towed a steam locomotive into one end of the building to provide steam heat and electricity. That one factory produced more tanks than the Germans built in the entire course of the war.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 213</div></div><p>Drives home how overwhelming America already was. No wonder the world begged them to join. And no wonder we exacted tribute for our effort.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;While some people will grow rich putting up windmills and solar panels, they won’t make money on an Exxon scale because you can’t charge for the sun. (That’s why Exxon hates solar: you put up a solar panel and the energy comes for free, which to the corporate mind is the stupidest business plan ever.) The cash you spend for energy stays close to home; there’s no way for the Koch brothers to become our richest and most powerful citizens simply by shipping fuel hither and yon.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 216</div></div><p>This does point up that there were tremendous infrastructure costs associated early on and continuing today. To charge for or to monopolize it is not the problem, per se. The problem is in lying about catastrophic downsides and torpedoing alternatives that are not personally lucrative but would be better for everyone else.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;In any event, as Thoreau later wrote, he was thinking of solutions that went well beyond the simple democratic rule his New England ancestors had fought for: Cast your whole vote, not a strip of paper merely, but your whole influence. A minority is powerless while it conforms to the majority; it is not even a minority then; but it is irresistible when it clogs by its whole weight. If the alternative is to keep all just men in prison, or give up war and slavery, the State will not hesitate which to choose. If a thousand men were not to pay their tax bills this year, that would not be a violent and bloody measure, as it would be to pay them, and enable the State to commit violence and shed innocent blood. This is, in fact, the definition of a peaceable revolution, if any such is possible.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 218</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;So, he was led off to jail, and there he spent the night. His friend Ralph Waldo Emerson is said to have visited and asked why he was there, only to be asked in return, “Why are you not?” In any event, as Thoreau later wrote, he was thinking of solutions that went well beyond the simple democratic rule his New England ancestors had fought for: Cast your whole vote, not a strip of paper merely, but your whole influence. A minority is powerless while it conforms to the majority; it is not even a minority then; but it is irresistible when it clogs by its whole weight. If the alternative is to keep all just men in prison, or give up war and slavery, the State will not hesitate which to choose. If a thousand men were not to pay their tax bills this year, that would not be a violent and bloody measure, as it would be to pay them, and enable the State to commit violence and shed innocent blood. This is, in fact, the definition of a peaceable revolution, if any such is possible.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 218</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The futurist Yuval Hariri said it was difficult to choose the twentieth century’s greatest discovery. Antibiotics, perhaps? The computer? “Now ask yourself what was the influential discovery of … traditional religions in the twentieth century. That too is a very difficult problem, because there is so little to choose from.”3 His sneer is misplaced. True, nonviolence didn’t emerge straight out of religion, and indeed, it sometimes subverted it—some of Gandhi’s greatest campaigns were aimed at Hinduism’s enduring caste discrimination. But mahatmas and ministers definitely led in developing this kind of resistance, and there is a spiritual insight at its core, one that traces at least back to the Sermon on the Mount. That’s the idea of turning the other cheek, of taking on unearned suffering, of engaging our sympathy for the weak instead of our truckling admiration for the strong.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 219</div></div><p>Protest is often lethal. But the oligarchs face a fight at every turn.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;And yet, all that firepower was almost powerless against the encampment that had gathered along the confluence of the Cannonball and the Missouri Rivers. In fact, the more force the oil barons deployed, the less it worked. The day they turned the dogs loose on peaceful demonstrators was the day that Standing Rock turned into a crisis for the White House, because people there knew what the pictures meant—they were a direct link to the iconic images of Birmingham and the civil rights movement. That Barack Obama was forced to enjoin the pipeline was a great victory; that Donald Trump bailed it out was a great, sad accident of history. But anyone who thinks that time is therefore on the side of the oil companies is reading history wrong. This movement will win (though, as we’ve seen, it may not win in time).&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 224</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;People are using the same tactic regularly now—in Nebraska, in Canada, in Australia, wherever a big new fossil fuel project is proposed. Some nuns recently built a chapel with a solar roof in the path of a pipeline. If you’re an oil company, whom would you rather fight? A guy with a rifle is no problem; you’ve got access to all the rifles in the world. But a guy with some solar panels, access to social media, and a clever streak will drive you three kinds of nuts.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 225</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;[…] friends who have matured fully, which means those who have placed limits on their own behavior in the interests of the community.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 227</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;And so, we did, beginning in the Adirondacks and Yellowstone, in an effort that spread around the world. Now 15 percent of the Earth’s surface is protected. Societies are measured not just by the things they build, but also by the things they can bring themselves to leave alone: whales, bright-plumed birds, mountains, children kept safe from Dickensian labor. People, alone among creatures, can decide to put such limits on themselves. None of these fights is easy; as I finish this manuscript, the Trump administration has just announced a new attack on the Endangered Species Act, on the grounds that it “impedes people’s livelihood.” But in a world where algorithms are starting to take over, where Facebook and Amazon know us much too well, these self-imposed limits help keep us human.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 228</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;the Kentucky farmer-writer Wendell Berry, said it best, long before anyone had heard of Cambridge Analytica: </p>
<p>&ldquo;Love the quick profit, the annual raise, vacation with pay.<br>
Want more of everything ready-made.<br>
Be afraid to know your neighbors and to die.<br>
And you will have a window in your head.<br>
Not even your future will be a mystery any more.</p>
<p>&ldquo;Your mind will be punched in a card and shut away in a little drawer.<br>
When they want you to buy something they will call you.<br>
When they want you to die for profit they will let you know.<br>
So, friends, every day do something that won’t compute.<br>
Love the Lord. Love the world. Work for nothing.<br>
Take all that you have and be poor. […] </p>
<p>&ldquo;As soon as the generals and the politicos can predict the motions of your mind, lose it.<br>
Leave it as a sign to mark the false trail, the way you didn’t go.<br>
Be like the fox who makes more tracks than necessary, some in the wrong direction.<br>
Practice resurrection.&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 228</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;We find out what those benefits are worth only when they evaporate, and even then, the losses register mostly unconsciously—you don’t know what you’ve got till it’s gone, by which point you’re usually pretty well accustomed to the replacement. This is why I think it’s useful that both nonviolence and solar panels nudge us, at least a little, toward a smaller-scale world less obsessed with efficiency.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 231</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Donald Trump, I think, would have had a hard time being elected a mayor or a governor, because the damage he’d have done would have hit too close to home. But given the size of America, people could vote for him for president on the theory that he’d “shake things up,” reasonably confident that they wouldn’t be hit by the falling pieces.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 232</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;What I’m trying to say is what worked in the past doesn’t automatically work in the future. At one point, growth provided more benefit than cost. Light regulation spurred expansion. Larger scale offered efficiencies that made us richer. Fine. You want your child to grow—if she doesn’t, you take her to the doctor. But if she’s twenty-two and still shooting up by six inches a year, you take her to the doctor, too. There’s a time and a place for growth, and a time and a place for maturity, for balance, for scale. And the risks we’re currently running, the risks I’ve spent this book describing, suggest that that time is now.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 233</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Given that there’s no finishing line to the human game, no obvious goal toward which we are racing, then why exactly are we so intent on constantly speeding up?&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 233</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Even those philosophers who think we’re solving most of the world’s troubles believe that we should double down on business as usual to mop up the remaining woes: Pinker, for instance, refuses to brook even momentary slowdowns or limits; his prescription “for today’s bioethicists can be summarized in a single sentence: Get out of the way.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 236</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;screen-bound people “are less likely to know and interact with their neighbors.” This is hideously bad news because “studies have shown that the more people feel a strong sense of belongingness, the more they perceive life as meaningful”2—meaningful enough for them to keep on living it.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 243</div></div><p>Again with the &ldquo;every life matters&rdquo;, even those whose owners can&rsquo;t find purpose in them.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;These are people who, at some level, hate the idea of society, who organize campaigns against public transit, who try to dismantle public schools and national parks, who instinctively head for the gated enclave. I don’t think their rule will last forever, but as I’ve said, they currently possess a savage leverage, perhaps power enough to end the human game. Certainly, they’re trying their best. The endless efforts to gerrymander districts, suppress voting, race-bait, gin up cynicism in our politics, confuse us about issues such as climate change—these are nothing more than efforts to weaken society so it can’t exert power over its most dominant individuals.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 243</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The day before the launch, I went on a tour with public affairs officer Greg Harland and SME (subject matter expert) Don Dankert, who had overseen the rebuilding of dunes along the Atlantic shoreline of the Kennedy Space Center. I’d been warned not even to raise the topic of global warming, which was fine with me—I didn’t want to get them fired.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 250</div></div><p>Christ, that&rsquo;s infantile.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Most of us don’t go as far as Muir—we still wince when we read of some gator emerging from the water hazard on the sixth hole to chomp down on an unwary golfer—but his basic idea that all of creation matters has made some real headway.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 253</div></div><p>Nope. Have at it, Mr. Alligator. It&rsquo;s more your world than theirs/ours.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;But humans have also now set aside beaches for turtles and have organized patrols to protect their nests—in some places, they cage each nest in wire to keep the raccoons at bay. They’ve mandated “turtle excluder devices” on shrimp nets. Even the new dune built along the launchpad complex was designed in part to block the lights that often confused the turtles emerging to build their nests. And so, in some places, populations have begun to rebound—only, of course, to be threatened anew by rising heat (the temperature of the sand determines the sex of the eggs) and soaring acidity.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 253</div></div><p>Such poignant, holistic thinking and writing.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;And—this is for me the second lesson—the most curious of all those lives are the human ones, because we can destroy, but also because we can decide not to destroy. The turtle does what she does, and magnificently. She can’t not do it, though, any more than the beaver can decide to take a break from building dams or the bee from making honey. But if the bird’s special gift is flight, ours is the possibility of restraint. We’re the only creature who can decide not to do something we’re capable of doing. That’s our superpower, even if we exercise it too rarely.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 255</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;So, yes, we can wreck the Earth as we’ve known it, killing vast numbers of ourselves and wiping out entire swaths of other life—in fact, as we’ve seen, we’re doing that right now. But we can also not do that.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 255</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;[…] do not know that we will make these choices. I rather suspect we won’t—we are faltering now, and the human game has indeed begun to play itself out.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 255</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;And—this is for me the second lesson—the most curious of all those lives are the human ones, because we can destroy, but also because we can decide not to destroy. The turtle does what she does, and magnificently. She can’t not do it, though, any more than the beaver can decide to take a break from building dams or the bee from making honey. But if the bird’s special gift is flight, ours is the possibility of restraint. We’re the only creature who can decide not to do something we’re capable of doing. That’s our superpower, even if we exercise it too rarely. So, yes, we can wreck the Earth as we’ve known it, killing vast numbers of ourselves and wiping out entire swaths of other life—in fact, as we’ve seen, we’re doing that right now. But we can also not do that. We could instead put a solar panel on the top of every last one of those roofs that I described at the opening of this book, and if we do, then we will have started in a different direction. We can engineer our children, at least a little now and doubtless more in the future—or we can decide not to. We can build our replacements in the form of ever-smarter robots, and we can try to keep ourselves alive as digitally preserved consciousnesses—or we can accept with grace that each of us has a moment and a place. I do not know that we will make these choices. I rather suspect we won’t—we are faltering now, and the human game has indeed begun to play itself out. That’s what the relentless rise in temperature tells us, and the fact that we increasingly spend our days staring glumly at the rectangle in our palm. But we could make those choices.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 255</div></div>      </div>
      </div>
        <div class="footer">
    <div class="footer-data"><div class="footer-links"><ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/contact.php" title="">Contact</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/support.php" title="">Support</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/privacy.php" title="">Privacy</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/rights.php" title="">Rights</a></li></ul></div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="copyright">Copyright (c) 1999-2026 earthli.com. All Rights Reserved.</div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="versions">Powered by <ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore/app_news.php">earthli News 3.7</a></li><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore" title="">earthli WebCore&trade; 3.7</a></li></ul></div></div>    </div>
      </div>
  </div>  </body>
</html>
]]>
  </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
      <title type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[No Silver Bullet—Essence and Accident in Software Engineering by Frederick P. Brooks, Jr. (1986) (read in 2019)]]>
  </title>
    <id>https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3833</id>
    <link href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3833"/>
    <updated>2019-12-27T00:04:02+01:00</updated>
    <author>
        <name type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[Marco von Ballmoos]]>
  </name>
      <uri>https://earthli.com/users/marco</uri>
    </author>
      <summary type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<blockquote class="quote abstract "><div>Disclaimer: these are notes I took while reading this book. They include citations I found interesting or enlightening or particularly well-written. In some cases, I&rsquo;ve pointed out which of these applies to which citation; in others, I have not. Any benefit you gain from reading these notes is... [<a class="complete-text-link" href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3833">More</a>]</div></blockquote>]]>
  </summary>
      <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<html lang="en">
  <head>
    <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/themes/ice.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/fonts/raleway.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/core/medium.css">
  </head>
  <body>
<div class="style-controls">  <div class="page">
    <div class="page-body">
<div class="info-box-top">
<p>
Published by <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_user.php?name=marco" title="Marco von Ballmoos" class="visible">marco</a> on <span class="date-time">27. Dec 2019 00:04:02 (GMT-5)</span>
</p>
</div>
      <div class="text-flow wide">
  <blockquote class="quote abstract "><div>Disclaimer: these are notes I took while reading this book. They include citations I found interesting or enlightening or particularly well-written. In some cases, I&rsquo;ve pointed out which of these applies to which citation; in others, I have not. Any benefit you gain from reading these notes is purely incidental to the purpose they serve of reminding me what I once read. Please see Wikipedia for a summary if I&rsquo;ve failed to provide one sufficient for your purposes. If my notes serve to trigger an interest in this book, then I&rsquo;m happy for you.</div></blockquote><p>This is a relatively short but important essay in the world of software engineering theory. It&rsquo;s not really for programmers who&rsquo;ve stumbled over from scripting Photoshop or who&rsquo;ve decided that there&rsquo;s good money in copy/pasting code that they don&rsquo;t understand from StackOverflow. The audience is more self-selecting. If you&rsquo;re likely to read an essay with this name, then you&rsquo;ll likely be receptive to its ideas. That is, if you don&rsquo;t already agree with the premises in the document, you&rsquo;re unlikely to be convinced by it.</p>
<p>Brooks is one of the inventors of OS/360 for IBM mainframes and, more famously, the author of the book <em>The Mythical Man-Month</em>. He draws on a lot of experience when he writes that the difficult bit of software is not writing it so that it works—it&rsquo;s figuring out what you want to write in the first place.</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;I believe the hard part of building software to be the specification, design, and testing of this conceptual construct, not the labor of representing it and testing the fidelity of the representation.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>He argues in this paper that where we often go wrong is when we attempt to <span class="quote-inline">&ldquo;abstract away […] complexity&rdquo;</span> but end up <span class="quote-inline">&ldquo;abstract[ing] away its essence&rdquo;</span>. Abstractions are a good thing. The only way to represent any process in software is to create a model of it. But we haven&rsquo;t historically been careful enough that what we ignore—the corners we cut, the values we round—aren&rsquo;t part of the essence of what we&rsquo;re building.</p>
<p>This leads Brooks to the next conclusion, that, <span class="quote-inline">&ldquo;No facilitation of expression can give more than marginal gains.&rdquo;</span> If you want to write software more quickly, changing languages or runtimes or patterns will offer, at best, marginal gains relative to improving the process you use to design that software and gather and define its parameters and requirements.</p>
<p>This is a tragic conclusion for most programmers, a vast majority of whom are much more interested in trying out new techniques and languages and IDE tools and extensions and just tweaking the hell out of the <em>implementation</em> side of things. This is all very interesting and <em>can</em> lead to fruitful gains. Brooks acknowledges as much,</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The gap between the best software engineering practice and the average practice is very wide—perhaps wider than in any other engineering discipline. A tool that disseminates good practice would be important.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>But once you&rsquo;re testing properly and have a good framework and a good editor and you&rsquo;ve got CI and maybe even CD, there&rsquo;s no more room for quantum leaps in improvement. At that point, you can only get significantly better and faster by <em>writing only the code that you actually need</em>. For that, you need to optimize defining your requirements.</p>
<p>Grasping and defining requirements is by no means an easy thing, as any non-trivial software involves a state machine with exponentially increasing combinations of states.</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;From the complexity comes the difficulty of enumerating, much less understanding, all the possible states of the program, and from that comes the unreliability. [1]&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>Where does this complexity come from? Often, from outside of the system, at the edges, where the software must interface with other systems. Perhaps these are legacy systems; they are almost certainly less flexible than the software being designed and written <em>right now</em>. The new software is, by definition, more malleable than software or processes already in production. As Brooks puts it,</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;[…] all cases, much complexity comes from conformation to other interfaces; this cannot be simplified out by any redesign of the software alone.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>All of this necessary/essential complexity <span class="quote-inline">&ldquo;makes personnel turnover a disaster&rdquo;</span> once you&rsquo;ve trained someone to understand it. This is a lesson that the software world—with its focus on exchangeable resources that just provide hours of work—has never learned or, more generously, forgotten.</p>
<p>Perhaps this is due to the prevalence of so many layers of management. They generally don&rsquo;t know how to do anything special and are generally highly interchangeable with other managers who also aren&rsquo;t very special. Their ego depends on their worldview considering all other people to be the same. This includes the highly trained and skilled staff who they manage.</p>
<p>Brooks ends with an eloquently and succinctly stated summary that jibes 100% with my experience over the last 25 years of designing and building software.</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Therefore the most important function that software builders do for their clients is the iterative extraction and refinement of the product requirements. For the truth is, <strong>the clients do not know what they want.</strong> They usually do not know what questions must be answered, and <strong>they almost never have thought of the problem in the detail that must be specified</strong>. (Emphasis added.)&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>This is what we have to work with: the domain specialist (the client) doesn&rsquo;t have the know-how to even know how to describe the domain. Sometimes there is no real domain specialist; there is just someone with money and a vague idea or, even worse, someone who <em>thinks</em> that they are a domain expert. The job of a software designer is to become (enough of) a domain specialist to bridge the gap. If nobody bridges the gap, then the software will fail.</p>
<p><hr></p>
<div class="footnote-reference"><span id="footnote_DRAFTABLE_ENTRY_3833_1_body" class="footnote-number">[1]</span> <p>This reminds me a bit of an article I read called <a href="https://lord.io/blog/2019/text-editing-hates-you-too/">Text Editing Hates You Too</a>, which included the following:</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The necessary complexity here is immense, and this post only scratches the very surface of it. If anything, it’s a miracle of the simplicity of modern programming that we’re able to just slap down a &lt;textarea&gt; on a web page and instantly provide a text input for every internet user around the globe.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>Here, too, the author discusses <em>necessary</em> complexity—perhaps better described as <em>immanent</em> complexity.</p>
</div><h2>Citations</h2><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The essence of a software entity is a construct of interlocking concepts: data sets, relationships among data items, algorithms, and invocations of functions. This essence is abstract, in that the conceptual construct is the same under many different representations. It is nonetheless highly precise and richly detailed. I believe the hard part of building software to be the specification, design, and testing of this conceptual construct, not the labor of representing it and testing the fidelity of the representation.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 38-42</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The complexity of software is [a]n essential property, not an accidental one. Hence descriptions of a software entity that abstract away its complexity often abstract away its essence. Mathematics and the physical sciences made great strides for three centuries by constructing simplified models of complex phenomena, deriving properties from the models, and verifying those properties experimentally. This worked because the complexities ignored in the models were not the essential properties of the phenomena. It does not work when the complexities are the essence.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 51-55</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;From the complexity comes the difficulty of enumerating, much less understanding, all the possible states of the program, and from that comes the unreliability.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 57-58</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;[This complexity] creates the tremendous learning and understanding burden that makes personnel turnover a disaster.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 62-62</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;In many cases the software must conform because it has most recently come to the scene. In others it must conform because it is perceived as the most conformable. But in all cases, much complexity comes from conformation to other interfaces; this cannot be simplified out by any redesign of the software alone.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 68-70</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;All successful software gets changed. Two processes are at work. As a software product is found to be useful, people try it in new cases at the edge of, or beyond, the original domain. The pressures for extended function come chiefly from users who like the basic function and invent new uses for it.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 76-78</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;As soon as we attempt to diagram software structure, we find it to constitute not one, but several, general directed graphs, superimposed one upon another. The several graphs may represent the flow of control, the flow of data, patterns of dependency, time sequence, name-space relationships. These are usually not even planar, much less hierarchical. Indeed, one of the ways of establishing conceptual control over such structure is to enforce link cutting until one or more of the graphs becomes hierarchical.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 86-89</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The hard thing about building software is deciding what to say, not saying it. No facilitation of expression can give more than marginal gains.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 161-162</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Even more difficult and important is the twofold task of knowledge acquisition: finding articulate, self-analytical experts who know why they do things; and developing efficient techniques for extracting what they know and distilling it into rule bases. The essential prerequisite for building an expert system is to have an expert.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 190-193</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The gap between the best software engineering practice and the average practice is very wide—perhaps wider than in any other engineering discipline. A tool that disseminates good practice would be important.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 194-195</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The hardest part of the software task is arriving at a complete and consistent specification, and much of the essence of building a program is in fact the debugging of the specification.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 235-236</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The hardest single part of building a software system is deciding precisely what to build. No other part of the conceptual work is so difficult as establishing the detailed technical requirements, including all the interfaces to people, to machines, and to other software systems. No other part of the work so cripples the resulting system if done wrong. No other part is more difficult [t]o rectify later.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 282-285</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Therefore the most important function that software builders do for their clients is the iterative extraction and refinement of the product requirements. For the truth is, the clients do not know what they want. They usually do not know what questions must be answered, and they almost never have thought of the problem in the detail that must be specified. Even the simple answer—”Make the new software system work like our old manual information-processing system”—is in fact too simple. Clients never want exactly that.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 285-288</div></div>      </div>
      </div>
        <div class="footer">
    <div class="footer-data"><div class="footer-links"><ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/contact.php" title="">Contact</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/support.php" title="">Support</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/privacy.php" title="">Privacy</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/rights.php" title="">Rights</a></li></ul></div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="copyright">Copyright (c) 1999-2026 earthli.com. All Rights Reserved.</div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="versions">Powered by <ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore/app_news.php">earthli News 3.7</a></li><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore" title="">earthli WebCore&trade; 3.7</a></li></ul></div></div>    </div>
      </div>
  </div>  </body>
</html>
]]>
  </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
      <title type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[Operating Manual for Spaceship Earth by Richard Buckminster Fuller (1969) (read in 2019)]]>
  </title>
    <id>https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3832</id>
    <link href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3832"/>
    <updated>2019-12-26T23:00:13+01:00</updated>
    <author>
        <name type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[Marco von Ballmoos]]>
  </name>
      <uri>https://earthli.com/users/marco</uri>
    </author>
      <summary type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<blockquote class="quote abstract "><div>Disclaimer: these are notes I took while reading this book. They include citations I found interesting or enlightening or particularly well-written. In some cases, I&rsquo;ve pointed out which of these applies to which citation; in others, I have not. Any benefit you gain from reading these notes is... [<a class="complete-text-link" href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3832">More</a>]</div></blockquote>]]>
  </summary>
      <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<html lang="en">
  <head>
    <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/themes/ice.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/fonts/raleway.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/core/medium.css">
  </head>
  <body>
<div class="style-controls">  <div class="page">
    <div class="page-body">
<div class="info-box-top">
<p>
Published by <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_user.php?name=marco" title="Marco von Ballmoos" class="visible">marco</a> on <span class="date-time">26. Dec 2019 23:00:13 (GMT-5)</span>
</p>
<p>
Updated by <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_user.php?name=marco" title="Marco von Ballmoos" class="visible">marco</a> on <span class="date-time">26. Dec 2019 23:00:57 (GMT-5)</span>
</p>
</div>
      <div class="text-flow wide">
  <blockquote class="quote abstract "><div>Disclaimer: these are notes I took while reading this book. They include citations I found interesting or enlightening or particularly well-written. In some cases, I&rsquo;ve pointed out which of these applies to which citation; in others, I have not. Any benefit you gain from reading these notes is purely incidental to the purpose they serve of reminding me what I once read. Please see Wikipedia for a summary if I&rsquo;ve failed to provide one sufficient for your purposes. If my notes serve to trigger an interest in this book, then I&rsquo;m happy for you.</div></blockquote><p>This is an essay by one of the 20th century&rsquo;s preëminent thinkers about the state of the planet in 1969. Things weren&rsquo;t any better or worse or even significantly different then than they are now, 50 years later.</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Because yesterday’s negatives are moved out of sight from their familiar locations many persons are willing to pretend to themselves that the problems have been solved.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>Yup. That still sounds a lot like us.</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;I feel that one of the reasons why we are struggling inadequately today is that we reckon our costs on too shortsighted a basis and are later overwhelmed with the unexpected costs brought about by our shortsightedness.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>Oh yeah, he&rsquo;s got our number. Jesus, haven&rsquo;t we changed one bit over 50 years? Didn&rsquo;t we kind of have to improve in order to accomplish all that we did? Shouldn&rsquo;t we get started on that? You know, in order to get this climate crisis under control?</p>
<p>Fuller was also not very hopeful, though he was more hopeful than our subsequent behavior warranted: he actually thought we&rsquo;d have conquered nationalism by now.</p>
<p>Fuller hypothesizes that a main part of the problem is that, regardless of ideology, all of the <span class="quote-inline">&ldquo;political leadership […a]ll the great ideological groups assumed Armageddon.&rdquo;</span> With such a fatalistic starting point, what&rsquo;s the point of planning for a long future? Just get yours, Jack, and screw everybody else. Fuller dismisses this idiocy as utterly beside the point—as the only worthwhile point would be survival as a species. He puts it quite lucidly.</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;It is really a worthless pile of chips of an arbitrary game which we are playing and does not correspond to the accounting processes of our real universe’s evolutionary transactions.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>You hear that billionaires? You&rsquo;re not going to Mars. You&rsquo;re sitting on a worthless pile of chips that won&rsquo;t help you at all when the revolution comes or the crisis intensifies—or both. You&rsquo;ll be the first against the wall (no you won&rsquo;t, not as long as you control media, you won&rsquo;t).</p>
<p>Were people of Fuller&rsquo;s caliber and level of education aware of climate change? It&rsquo;s kind of unclear. On one level, he&rsquo;s hyper-aware that industrialization is ruining the &ldquo;spaceship&rdquo;,</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;[…] up to now we have been misusing, abusing, and polluting this extraordinary chemical energy-interchanging system for successfully regenerating all life aboard our planetary spaceship.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>As for global warming, he worries about mankind&rsquo;s depletion rate of fossil fuels, at most. He worries about <span class="quote-inline">&ldquo;pollution&rdquo;</span> but not specifically greenhouse gases, even though the idea was <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Global_warming#History_of_the_science">first proposed with supporting evidence in 1938</a> (<cite><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/">Wikipedia</a></cite>) and I would have expected him to be aware of the concept.</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;We cannot afford to expend our fossil fuels faster than we are “recharging our battery,” which means precisely the rate at which the fossil fuels are being continually deposited within Earth’s spherical crust.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>But on the other hand, he still idolizes the process of industrialization for having lifted so many people out of abject poverty and misery.</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The labor movement made possible mass purchasing; ergo, mass production; ergo, low prices on vastly improved products and services, which have altogether established entirely new and higher standards of humanity’s living.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>Remember, though, that he was writing in 1969, arguably the high point of a global economic golden age when mankind was largely unaware of the scope of the folly of its mode of operation. It was only in the late 70s and early 80s that hyper-financialization took over to centralize operations and began to reverse the gains of the mid-20th century.</p>
<p>Fuller&rsquo;s writing style is not exactly representative of his intelligence. It&rsquo;s full of bizarre and exceedingly complex constructions, has a unique approach to hyphenation (using too many even for me) and he leaves off many articles. It came as a surprise as he was raised and educated in the United States, had graduated from Harvard and was a member of many prestigious scientific societies.</p>
<h2>Citations</h2><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;First, I’d like to explore a few thoughts about the vital data confronting us right nowsuch as the fact that more than half of humanity as yet exists in miserable poverty, prematurely doomed, unless we alter our comprehensive physical circumstances. It is certainly no solution to evict the poor, replacing their squalid housing with much more expensive buildings which the original tenants can’t afford to reoccupy. Our society adopts many such superficial palliatives. Because yesterday’s negatives are moved out of sight from their familiar locations many persons are willing to pretend to themselves that the problems have been solved.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 28-32</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;I feel that one of the reasons why we are struggling inadequately today is that we reckon our costs on too shortsighted a basis and are later overwhelmed with the unexpected costs brought about by our shortsightedness.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 32-33</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;This &ldquo;sovereign–meaning top-weapons enforced‹&rdquo;national&rdquo; claim upon humans born in various lands leads to ever more severely specialized servitude and highly personalized identity classification. As a consequence of the slavish &ldquo;categoryitis&rdquo; the scientifically illogical, and as we shall see, often meaningless questions &ldquo;Where do you live?&rdquo; &ldquo;What are you?&rdquo; &ldquo;What religion?&rdquo; &ldquo;What race?&rdquo; ’&rdquo;What nationality?&rdquo; are all thought of today as logical questions. By the twentyfirst century it either will have become evident to humanity that these questions are absurd and anti-evolutionary or men will no longer be living on Earth.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 94-98</div></div><p>Not quite yet.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Because of the working concept that there was not enough to go around, the most aggressive political leaders exercised their political leadership by heading their countries into war to overcome the rest of the world, thus to dispose of the unsupportable excess population through decimation and starvation-the age-old, lethal formula of ignorant men. Thus we had all our world society specializing, whether under fascism, communism, or capitalism. All the great ideological groups assumed Armageddon.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 268-271</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Our little Spaceship Earth is right now travelling at sixty thousand miles an hour around the around the sun and is also spinning axially, which, at the latitude of Washington, D. C., adds approximately one thousand miles per hour to our motion. Each minute we both spin at one hundred miles and zip in orbit at one thousand miles. That is a whole lot of spin and zip.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 310-312</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;You and I can go out and take a sunbath, but are unable to take in enough energy through our skins to keep alive. So part of the invention of the Spaceship Earth and its biological life-sustaining is that the vegetation on the land and the algae in the sea, employing photosynthesis, are designed to impound the life-regenerating energy for us to adequate amount.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 322-324</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;It is therefore paradoxical but strategically explicable, as we shall see, that up to now we have been misusing, abusing, and polluting this extraordinary chemical energy-interchanging system for successfully regenerating all life aboard our planetary spaceship.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 331-332</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Thus under lethal emergencies vast new magnitudes of wealth come mysteriously into effective operation. We don’t seem to be able to afford to do peacefully the logical things we say we ought to be doing to forestall warring-by producing enough to satisfy all the world needs. Under pressure we always find that we can afford to wage the wars brought about by the vital struggle of &ldquo;have-nots&rdquo; to share or take over the bounty of the &ldquo;haves.&rdquo;&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 538-541</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;It is really a worthless pile of chips of an arbitrary game which we are playing and does not correspond to the accounting processes of our real universe’s evolutionary transactions.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 580-582</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Now we can account wealth more precisely as the number of forward days for a specific number of people we are physically prepared to sustain at a physically stated time and space liberating level of metabolic and metaphysical regeneration.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 595-597</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;It is also worth remembering that the validity of what our reputedly rich man in the shipwreck had in those real estate equities went back only to the validity &ldquo;in the eyes of God&rdquo; of the original muscle, cunning, and weapons-established-sovereign-claimed lands and their subsequent legal re-deedings as &ldquo;legal&rdquo; properties protected by the moral-or-no, weaponsenforced laws of the sovereign nations and their subsequent abstraction into limited-liabilitycorporation equities printed on paper stocks and bonds.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 586-589</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;What man has done is to decentralize his functions into a world-around-energy-networked complex of tools which altogether constitute what we refer to as world industrialization.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 828-829</div></div><p>Fuller&rsquo;s writing style is odd. Hyper-hyphenation and a lot of missing articles.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;As we study industrialization, we see that we cannot have mass production unless we have mass consumption. This was effected evolutionarily by the great social struggles of labor to increase wages and spread the benefits and prevent the reduction of the numbers of workers employed. The labor movement made possible mass purchasing; ergo, mass production; ergo, low prices on vastly improved products and services, which have altogether established entirely new and higher standards of humanity’s living.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 850-853</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Man can and may metaphysically comprehend, anticipate, shunt, and meteringly introduce the evolutionarily organized environment events in the magnitudes and frequencies that best synchronize with the patterns of his successful and metaphysical metabolic regeneration while ever increasing the degrees of humanity’s space and time freedoms from yesterday’s ignorance sustaining survival procedure chores and their personal time capital wasting.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 887-890</div></div><p>This is another bizarre sentence, almost stream-of-consciousness, with missing hyphens and aggressive and inappropriate use of adverbs.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Only by understanding this scheme may we continue for all time ahead to enjoy and explore universe as we progressively harness evermore of the celestially generated tidal and storm generated wind, water, and electrical power concentrations. We cannot afford to expend our fossil fuels faster than we are &ldquo;recharging our battery,&rdquo; which means precisely the rate at which the fossil fuels are being continually deposited within Earth’s spherical crust.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 903-906</div></div>      </div>
      </div>
        <div class="footer">
    <div class="footer-data"><div class="footer-links"><ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/contact.php" title="">Contact</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/support.php" title="">Support</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/privacy.php" title="">Privacy</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/rights.php" title="">Rights</a></li></ul></div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="copyright">Copyright (c) 1999-2026 earthli.com. All Rights Reserved.</div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="versions">Powered by <ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore/app_news.php">earthli News 3.7</a></li><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore" title="">earthli WebCore&trade; 3.7</a></li></ul></div></div>    </div>
      </div>
  </div>  </body>
</html>
]]>
  </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
      <title type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[Does anyone have the right to sex? by Amia Srinivasan (2018) (read in 2019)]]>
  </title>
    <id>https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3831</id>
    <link href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3831"/>
    <updated>2019-12-26T10:12:59+01:00</updated>
    <author>
        <name type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[Marco von Ballmoos]]>
  </name>
      <uri>https://earthli.com/users/marco</uri>
    </author>
      <summary type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<blockquote class="quote abstract "><div>Disclaimer: these are notes I took while reading this book. They include citations I found interesting or enlightening or particularly well-written. In some cases, I&rsquo;ve pointed out which of these applies to which citation; in others, I have not. Any benefit you gain from reading these notes is... [<a class="complete-text-link" href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3831">More</a>]</div></blockquote>]]>
  </summary>
      <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<html lang="en">
  <head>
    <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/themes/ice.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/fonts/raleway.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/core/medium.css">
  </head>
  <body>
<div class="style-controls">  <div class="page">
    <div class="page-body">
<div class="info-box-top">
<p>
Published by <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_user.php?name=marco" title="Marco von Ballmoos" class="visible">marco</a> on <span class="date-time">26. Dec 2019 10:12:59 (GMT-5)</span>
</p>
<p>
Updated by <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_user.php?name=marco" title="Marco von Ballmoos" class="visible">marco</a> on <span class="date-time">26. Dec 2019 11:56:40 (GMT-5)</span>
</p>
</div>
      <div class="text-flow wide">
  <blockquote class="quote abstract "><div>Disclaimer: these are notes I took while reading this book. They include citations I found interesting or enlightening or particularly well-written. In some cases, I&rsquo;ve pointed out which of these applies to which citation; in others, I have not. Any benefit you gain from reading these notes is purely incidental to the purpose they serve of reminding me what I once read. Please see Wikipedia for a summary if I&rsquo;ve failed to provide one sufficient for your purposes. If my notes serve to trigger an interest in this book, then I&rsquo;m happy for you.</div></blockquote><p>This is a medium-length essay/tract that was recommended as insightful, but fell rather short. It starts off discussing the notion of the incel community as a powder keg that is a danger to society because of its expectation of sex from the &ldquo;hottest&rdquo; members.  This is already more than a bit of straw man based on the whackiest members of the group.</p>
<p>This tack is based on taking the reasoning of one or two mentally ill people seriously and literally. When someone says he killed a bunch of co-eds because his Satan controlling his dog told him to, we don&rsquo;t infer a whole dangerous movement—we just figure that person is mentally ill. But if the same person claims it&rsquo;s because those hot bitches wouldn&rsquo;t blow him, then we infer a vast underground movement that lurks beneath society.</p>
<p>There were some limpid bits in the essay but it was otherwise all over the place (in a way very similar to Abdulali&rsquo;s <em>What We Talk about When We Talk about Rape</em>). It takes and runs with stereotypes inculcated and revered by … the media? Porn? Hollywood? and applies them broadly to an entire gender. There isn&rsquo;t really any insight or unpacking of societal reasons.</p>
<p>For example: The author states that <span class="quote-inline">&ldquo;sexy schoolgirls and sexy teachers, manic pixie dreamgirls and Milfs, [are] all taut-bodied and hot, minor variations&rdquo;</span> but that they can&rsquo;t <span class="quote-inline">&ldquo;imagine GQ carrying an article celebrating ‘mom bod’&rdquo;</span>. Aren&rsquo;t there several categories of porn that cater exactly to this? Just because a staid and establishment magazine like GQ wouldn&rsquo;t acknowledge it doesn&rsquo;t mean that society as a whole hasn&rsquo;t acknowledged it. If you read the yearly statistical roundup blog from any of the big porn sites, you&rsquo;ll see that actual (not mainstream media) preferences are much more equitable.</p>
<p>It is at this point that I would have expected a discussion of the separation between &ldquo;official culture&rdquo; and &ldquo;actual culture&rdquo;, where the official version is a fake version imposed from above as brainwashing. Nothing of the kind happens. Instead, there seems to be an argument that anyone who withholds their attraction from anyone who wants it is vaguely or even manifestly discriminatory. It&rsquo;s almost as if the author ends up making the incel argument?</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Consider the supreme fuckability of ‘hot blonde sluts’ and East Asian women, the comparative unfuckability of black women and Asian men, the fetishisation and fear of black male sexuality, the sexual disgust expressed towards disabled, trans and fat bodies.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>The tone is clear: all of this is bad. However, there are different reasons for all of it, aren&rsquo;t there? To redefine &ldquo;lack of interest&rdquo; on the part of most people as &ldquo;sexual disgust&rdquo; is disingenuous, at best. This is again defining the whole world in terms of what it wants to fuck, as if that&rsquo;s all anyone thinks about all day. While it may be true for some people, especially during certain phases of their lives, the tone in this essay distorts the world to define it purely in terms of sexual preference and inculcated attraction—and expectation.</p>
<p>That asian men and black women are unfuckable or that black men are dangerous predators has a lot more to do with American society than anything else. That is not really discussed much at all. That people are generally not turned on by disabled or fat bodies is at least partly biological, as is being attracted to people with whom you can procreate. It&rsquo;s almost as if you need to want to fuck someone in order not discriminate against them. But if you do want to fuck them, then you&rsquo;re discriminating against them by defining them purely as sexual beings. So, damned if you, damned if you don&rsquo;t. That&rsquo;s not an interesting or productive line of reasoning.</p>
<p>To prove that I&rsquo;m not unfairly paraphrasing, a direct citation:</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;In other words, the sex-positive gaze risks covering not only for misogyny, but for racism, ableism, transphobia, and every other oppressive system that makes its way into the bedroom through <strong>the seemingly innocuous mechanism of ‘personal preference’.</strong> (Emphasis added.)&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>Try teasing that statement apart. Am I hiding a palette of discriminatory beliefs behind the facade of nearly lifelong monogamy? Nice excuse, right? No wonder more and more people would rather identify as asexual than risk being called racist for what they mistook as biological apathy.</p>
<p>I understand that society has a lot to do with shaping personal preference, but so does biology. It&rsquo;s a ludicrous leap, though, to put the words into scare quotes and then call it &ldquo;seemingly innocuous&rdquo;, suggesting that anyone who is attracted to people that they feel instinctively attracted to is a Neanderthal without scruple or interest in advancing any social agendas. </p>
<p>But them Srinivasan double down and writes the following:</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;It’s because straight people – or, I should say, white, able-bodied cis straight people – aren’t much in the habit of thinking there’s anything wrong with how they have sex.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>Are you fucking kidding me? Straight sex isn’t freighted with judgment or confusion? I’m not in the dating scene and even I know that’s not true. Because…every movie ever. Have you ever seen a movie? Have you every interacted with modern culture? The majority of popular culture is about how white, able-bodied, cis, straight people being supremely uncomfortable about sex. They can&rsquo;t fucking stop talking about it or making movies and songs about it.</p>
<p>My impression is that we started with the thesis that so-called incels are wrong for thinking that anyone owes them sex. This turns out to be due not to any moral basis, but because these people tend to belong to the socially dominant class, irrespective of whether that membership has translated into any personal dominance in any facet of life. However, denying minorities or other groups historically discriminated against (e.g. fat, disabled, trans) sex is problematic as it expresses the societal discrimination along another axis.</p>
<p>To analogize: if black girl scouts show up at my door, I have to buy cookies, no matter what. If they&rsquo;re white, I&rsquo;m obligated to tell their privileged asses off. Alles klar.</p>
<h2>Citations</h2><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Meanwhile there are sexy schoolgirls and sexy teachers, manic pixie dreamgirls and Milfs, but they’re all taut-bodied and hot, minor variations on the same normative paradigm. (Can we imagine GQ carrying an article celebrating ‘mom bod’?)&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 46-48</div></div><p>That&rsquo;s not exactly true. There are genres that cater to different tastes. BBW, for example.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Beginning in the late 1970s, Catharine MacKinnon demanded that we abandon the Freudian view of sexual desire as ‘an innate primary natural prepolitical unconditioned drive divided along the biological gender line’ and recognise that sex under patriarchy is inherently violent; that ‘hostility and contempt, or arousal of master to slave, together with awe and vulnerability, or arousal of slave to master’ are its constitutive emotions.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 58-61</div></div><p>What the actual fuck is she talking about? She&rsquo;s off the rails.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Anti-porn feminism, Willis wrote, asked ‘women to accept a spurious moral superiority as a substitute for sexual pleasure, and curbs on men’s sexual freedom as a substitute for real power’.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 74-76</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Thinking about how patriarchal oppression is inflected by race and class – patriarchy doesn’t express itself uniformly, and cannot be understood independently of other systems of oppression – has made feminists reluctant to prescribe universal policies, including universal sexual policies. Demands for equal access to the workplace will be more resonant for white, middle-class women who have been forced to stay home than it will be for the black and working-class women who have always been expected to labour alongside men.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 76-80</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The important thing now is to take women at their word. If a woman says she enjoys working in porn, or being paid to have sex with men, or engaging in rape fantasies, or wearing stilettos – and even that she doesn’t just enjoy these things but finds them emancipatory, part of her feminist praxis – then we are required, as feminists, to trust her. This is not merely an epistemic claim: that a woman’s saying something about her own experience gives us strong, if not indefeasible, reason to think it true. It is also, or perhaps primarily, an ethical claim: a feminism that trades too freely in notions of selfdeception is a feminism that risks dominating the subjects it wants to liberate.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 83-88</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Third and fourth-wave feminists are right to say, for example, that sex work is work, and can be better work than the menial labour undertaken by most women. And they are right to say that what sex workers need are legal and material protections, safety and security, not rescue or rehabilitation.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 99-101</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Consider the supreme fuckability of ‘hot blonde sluts’ and East Asian women, the comparative unfuckability of black women and Asian men, the fetishisation and fear of black male sexuality, the sexual disgust expressed towards disabled, trans and fat bodies.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 115-117</div></div><p>One of these is not like the others.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;In other words, the sex-positive gaze risks covering not only for misogyny, but for racism, ableism, transphobia, and every other oppressive system that makes its way into the bedroom through the seemingly innocuous mechanism of ‘personal preference’.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 119-121</div></div><p>Jesus. Try teasing that apart. Am i hiding a palette of discriminatory beliefs behind the facade of monogamy? Nice excuse, right? No wonder more and more people would rather identify as asexual than risk being called racist for what they mistook as biological apathy.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;It’s because straight people – or, I should say, white, able-bodied cis straight people – aren’t much in the habit of thinking there’s anything wrong with how they have sex.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 137-138</div></div><p>Are you fucking kidding me? Straight sex isn&rsquo;t freighted with judgment? I&rsquo;m not in the dating scene and even I know that&rsquo;s not true. Because…every movie ever.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The distribution of sexual desire, like the distribution of food, is shaped by oppressive forces. This does not take away from the fact that no one is entitled to anyone else’s body. But it does complicate it. Like Solnit, I discuss the analogy in the context of a particular, embittered misogynist, who likened raping a woman to stealing food when starving. Here the analogy between sex and food is used for precisely the misogynistic ends Solnit wants to condemn. That it can be repurposed in this way points to the limits of the analogy: while starvation excuses theft in many cases, sexual ‘starvation’ never excuses rape. What’s more, while many of us think it is the duty of the state to ensure a just distribution of basic goods like food, far fewer of us would welcome state intervention in our patterns of sexual desire.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 233-239</div></div>      </div>
      </div>
        <div class="footer">
    <div class="footer-data"><div class="footer-links"><ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/contact.php" title="">Contact</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/support.php" title="">Support</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/privacy.php" title="">Privacy</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/rights.php" title="">Rights</a></li></ul></div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="copyright">Copyright (c) 1999-2026 earthli.com. All Rights Reserved.</div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="versions">Powered by <ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore/app_news.php">earthli News 3.7</a></li><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore" title="">earthli WebCore&trade; 3.7</a></li></ul></div></div>    </div>
      </div>
  </div>  </body>
</html>
]]>
  </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
      <title type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[Laudatio Si' by Pope Francis (2015) (read in 2019)]]>
  </title>
    <id>https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3830</id>
    <link href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3830"/>
    <updated>2019-12-25T23:49:17+01:00</updated>
    <author>
        <name type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[Marco von Ballmoos]]>
  </name>
      <uri>https://earthli.com/users/marco</uri>
    </author>
      <summary type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<blockquote class="quote abstract "><div>Disclaimer: these are notes I took while reading this book. They include citations I found interesting or enlightening or particularly well-written. In some cases, I&rsquo;ve pointed out which of these applies to which citation; in others, I have not. Any benefit you gain from reading these notes is... [<a class="complete-text-link" href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3830">More</a>]</div></blockquote>]]>
  </summary>
      <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<html lang="en">
  <head>
    <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/themes/ice.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/fonts/raleway.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/core/medium.css">
  </head>
  <body>
<div class="style-controls">  <div class="page">
    <div class="page-body">
<div class="info-box-top">
<p>
Published by <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_user.php?name=marco" title="Marco von Ballmoos" class="visible">marco</a> on <span class="date-time">25. Dec 2019 23:49:17 (GMT-5)</span>
</p>
</div>
      <div class="text-flow wide">
  <blockquote class="quote abstract "><div>Disclaimer: these are notes I took while reading this book. They include citations I found interesting or enlightening or particularly well-written. In some cases, I&rsquo;ve pointed out which of these applies to which citation; in others, I have not. Any benefit you gain from reading these notes is purely incidental to the purpose they serve of reminding me what I once read. Please see Wikipedia for a summary if I&rsquo;ve failed to provide one sufficient for your purposes. If my notes serve to trigger an interest in this book, then I&rsquo;m happy for you.</div></blockquote><p>This is the papal encyclical written by Pope Francis in 2015. It is relatively well-known and -cited in climate-change circles. It&rsquo;s extremely well-edited and much more on point with current issues than many would credit the church. I think it&rsquo;s best to (mostly) let Francis speak for himself.</p>
<p>The whole essay is worth a read (except for some long stretches of heavily religious babble—there&rsquo;s really no other word for it). While at times he presents very relevant scripture to counter arguments made by those erroneously quoting the Bible, at other times the document drags on considerably with page after page of seemingly unrelated and vaguely recruiting-oriented prose. Am I being unfair? You be the judge:</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Saint Bonaventure went so far as to say that human beings, before sin, were able to see how each creature “testifies that God is three”. The reflection of the Trinity was there to be recognized in nature “when that book was open to man and our eyes had not yet become darkened”.[170] The Franciscan saint teaches us that each creature bears in itself a specifically Trinitarian structure, so real that it could be readily contemplated if only the human gaze were not so partial, dark and fragile. In this way, he points out to us the challenge of trying to read reality in a Trinitarian key.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 1553-1557</div></div><p>This reads like something from any of Umberto Eco&rsquo;s masterpieces. I laud Francis for his effort. I don&rsquo;t think that was the point, though. Where Eco was being deliberately obtuse to demonstrate the impenetrability and non-disprovability of conspiracy/quasi-religious texts, I&rsquo;m afraid Francis isn&rsquo;t kidding. There were several dozen more chapters/paragraphs that were nothing but biblical babble in a similar vein.</p>
<p>Happily, at other times, he&rsquo;s often downright rational and scientific:</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Although change is part of the working of complex systems, the speed with which human activity has developed contrasts with the naturally slow pace of biological evolution. Moreover, the goals of this rapid and constant change are not necessarily geared to the common good or to integral and sustainable human development.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>He continues with a discussion of climate science and underlying economic models, as well as discussing the need for a <span class="quote-inline">&ldquo;circular economy&rdquo;</span>, which will enable us to live indefinitely and harmoniously on the planet, instead of rapaciously and terminally. In particular, he singles out <em>consumption</em> as the root of all evil.</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;We all know that it is not possible to sustain the present level of consumption in developed countries and wealthier sectors of society, where the habit of wasting and discarding has reached unprecedented levels. The exploitation of the planet has already exceeded acceptable limits and we still have not solved the problem of poverty.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>Basically, the Pope is disappointed with how the world works and thinks it should work significantly differently, from the bottom up. In particular, he dismisses the supposition that technology will save us—because technology is wielded by people and people have their own agenda. If their agenda is not aligned, then the technology will harm, not help.</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;[…] We have to accept that technological products are not neutral, for they create a framework which ends up conditioning lifestyles and shaping social possibilities along the lines dictated by the interests of certain powerful groups. Decisions which may seem purely instrumental are in reality decisions about the kind of society we want to build.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>It really seems (unsurprisingly, if you&rsquo;ve read the right bits of the Bible) that the Pope is a socialist, if not a communist.</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;To ensure economic freedom from which all can effectively benefit, restraints occasionally have to be imposed on those possessing greater resources and financial power.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>Here he is again, lashing out agains the consumption-based society (not just economy).</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;This paradigm leads people to believe that they are free as long as they have the supposed freedom to consume. But those really free are the minority who wield economic and financial power.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>At times, it&rsquo;s unclear whether he&rsquo;s voicing a deliberately naive opinion to demonstrate how ridiculous it is that we consider it naive, but sometimes the prose smacks of a complete inability to see the banal evil present in nearly everyone. For example, he poses the following question:</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;What would induce anyone, at this stage, to hold on to power only to be remembered for their inability to take action when it was urgent and necessary to do so?&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>If not rhetorical, then here&rsquo;s a shot at an answer: Because, in our world, there are never any negative repercussions, excuses are always accepted, idiocy is promoted and evil is left to live out its days in luxury. Does that help?</p>
<p>He does seem to understand, though, because at another point, he castigates the first world and its power brokers (which includes pretty much everyone in the 1%):</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;This is due partly to the fact that many professionals, opinion makers, communications media and centres of power, being located in affluent urban areas, are far removed from the poor, with little direct contact with their problems. They live and reason from the comfortable position of a high level of development and a quality of life well beyond the reach of the majority of the world’s population.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 302-305</div></div><p>He reserves his sternest worlds for baseless financialization and profit:</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;[…] economic powers continue to justify the current global system where priority tends to be given to speculation and the pursuit of financial gain.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>And then there&rsquo;s the utterly broken political system that is led by the nose by the underlying economics (it should be the other way around).</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;178. A politics concerned with immediate results, supported by consumerist sectors of the population, is driven to produce short-term growth. In response to electoral interests, governments are reluctant to upset the public with measures which could affect the level of consumption or create risks for foreign investment.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 1161-1163</div></div><p>And he&rsquo;s not done with the first world. He takes on the argument posed by some (many) that we need to reduce population. While this would undoubtedly help, those suggesting that we reduce imply heavily that we need to get rid of the third world and their pesky proclivity for procreative promulgation—to the point of overflowing their lands and then invading our own holy borders with waves of skilled immigrants.</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;To blame population growth instead of extreme and selective consumerism on the part of some, is one way of refusing to face the issues. It is an attempt to legitimize the present model of distribution, where a minority believes that it has the right to consume in a way which can never be universalized, since the planet could not even contain the waste products of such consumption.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>The Pope will also not stop peppering this document with relatively bold and non-nuanced opinions on the basic evil of abortion.</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;“The Lord created medicines out of the earth, and a sensible man will not despise them”&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>Like RU486? Sick burn ammirite?</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;There is a tendency to justify transgressing all boundaries when experimentation is carried out on living human embryos.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>We&rsquo;d almost forgotten where you stand there. </p>
<p>That ship has sailed, Francis; are you sure you want to die on that hill? He keeps hammering that point until I fear he may drive away potential allies. Instead, he should think of the actually living instead of worrying about edge cases. Not to mention that voluntary non-breeding in the developed world would go a significant way toward reducing carbon-production.</p>
<p>Does he have any concrete advice (other than to absolutely never have an abortion)? Yes, he does.</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;A person who could afford to spend and consume more but regularly uses less heating and wears warmer clothes, shows the kind of convictions and attitudes which help to protect the environment.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>Hooray! A few of us are doing that already. It&rsquo;s nice to see that the Pope thinks we&rsquo;re doing God&rsquo;s work.</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;If someone has not learned to stop and admire something beautiful, we should not be surprised if he or she treats everything as an object to be used and abused without scruple. <strong>If we want to bring about deep change, we need to realize that certain mindsets really do influence our behaviour.</strong>&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>Basically, we need to change everything about what it means to be a human in the Anthropocene. He&rsquo;s right, but it&rsquo;s pretty much hopeless. Still, I&rsquo;m glad I read it. It&rsquo;s almost as good as <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3538">Industrial Society and its Future</a>.</p>
<h2>Citations</h2><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;He spoke in similar terms to the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations about the potential for an “ecological catastrophe under the effective explosion of industrial civilization”, and stressed “the urgent need for a radical change in the conduct of humanity”, inasmuch as “the most extraordinary scientific advances, the most amazing technical abilities, the most astonishing economic growth, unless they are accompanied by authentic social and moral progress, will definitively turn against man”.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 20-24</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;My predecessor Benedict XVI likewise proposed “eliminating the structural causes of the dysfunctions of the world economy and correcting models of growth which have proved incapable of ensuring respect for the environment”.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 34-36</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;With paternal concern, Benedict urged us to realize that creation is harmed “where we ourselves have the final word, where everything is simply our property and we use it for ourselves alone. The misuse of creation begins when we no longer recognize any higher instance than ourselves, when we see nothing else but ourselves”.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 42-44</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The poverty and austerity of Saint Francis were no mere veneer of asceticism, but something much more radical: a refusal to turn reality into an object simply to be used and controlled.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 79-80</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Although change is part of the working of complex systems, the speed with which human activity has developed contrasts with the naturally slow pace of biological evolution. Moreover, the goals of this rapid and constant change are not necessarily geared to the common good or to integral and sustainable human development. Change is something desirable, yet it becomes a source of anxiety when it causes harm to the world and to the quality of life of much of humanity.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 119-122</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Technology, which, linked to business interests, is presented as the only way of solving these problems, in fact proves incapable of seeing the mysterious network of relations between things and so sometimes solves one problem only to create others.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 131-133</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;We have not yet managed to adopt a circular model of production capable of preserving resources for present and future generations, while limiting as much as possible the use of non-renewable resources, moderating their consumption, maximizing their efficient use, reusing and recycling them. A serious consideration of this issue would be one way of counteracting the throwaway culture which affects the entire planet, but it must be said that only limited progress has been made in this regard.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 143-146</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;They are not recognized by international conventions as refugees; they bear the loss of the lives they have left behind, without enjoying any legal protection whatsoever. Sadly, there is widespread indifference to such suffering, which is even now taking place throughout our world. Our lack of response to these tragedies involving our brothers and sisters points to the loss of that sense of responsibility for our fellow men and women upon which all civil society is founded.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 172-175</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;We all know that it is not possible to sustain the present level of consumption in developed countries and wealthier sectors of society, where the habit of wasting and discarding has reached unprecedented levels. The exploitation of the planet has already exceeded acceptable limits and we still have not solved the problem of poverty.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 184-186</div></div><p>Nice.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Our world has a grave social debt towards the poor who lack access to drinking water, because they are denied the right to a life consistent with their inalienable dignity This debt can be paid partly by an increase in funding to provide clean water and sanitary services among the poor.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 200-202</div></div><p>But we also have to be honest about where people live. A large part of the American West was never really habitable.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The human environment and the natural environment deteriorate together; we cannot adequately combat environmental degradation unless we attend to causes related to human and social degradation.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 291-292</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;This is due partly to the fact that many professionals, opinion makers, communications media and centres of power, being located in affluent urban areas, are far removed from the poor, with little direct contact with their problems. They live and reason from the comfortable position of a high level of development and a quality of life well beyond the reach of the majority of the world’s population.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 302-305</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;To blame population growth instead of extreme and selective consumerism on the part of some, is one way of refusing to face the issues. It is an attempt to legitimize the present model of distribution, where a minority believes that it has the right to consume in a way which can never be universalized, since the planet could not even contain the waste products of such consumption.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 313-315</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The problem is that we still lack the culture needed to confront this crisis. We lack leadership capable of striking out on new paths and meeting the needs of the present with concern for all and without prejudice towards coming generations. The establishment of a legal framework which can set clear boundaries and ensure the protection of ecosystems has become indispensable; otherwise, the new power structures based on the techno-economic paradigm may overwhelm not only our politics but also freedom and justice.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 345-348</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The alliance between the economy and technology ends up sidelining anything unrelated to its immediate interests. Consequently the most one can expect is superficial rhetoric, sporadic acts of philanthropy and perfunctory expressions of concern for the environment, whereas any genuine attempt by groups within society to introduce change is viewed as a nuisance based on romantic illusions or an obstacle to be circumvented.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 352-355</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;In the meantime, economic powers continue to justify the current global system where priority tends to be given to speculation and the pursuit of financial gain, which fail to take the context into account, let alone the effects on human dignity and the natural environment. Here we see how environmental deterioration and human and ethical degradation are closely linked. Many people will deny doing anything wrong because distractions constantly dull our consciousness of just how limited and finite our world really is. As a result, “whatever is fragile, like the environment, is defenceless before the interests of a deified market, which become the only rule”.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 359-364</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;What would induce anyone, at this stage, to hold on to power only to be remembered for their inability to take action when it was urgent and necessary to do so?&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 370-371</div></div><p>Because there are never any negative repercussions. Excuses are accepted, idiocy is promoted and evil is left to live out its days in luxury.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;It is good for humanity and the world at large when we believers better recognize the ecological commitments which stem from our convictions.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 409-410</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Clearly, the Bible has no place for a tyrannical anthropocentrism unconcerned for other creatures.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 447-448</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Similarly, every seven years, a sabbatical year was set aside for Israel, a complete rest for the land (cf. Lev25:1-4), when sowing was forbidden and one reaped only what was necessary to live on and to feed one’s household (cf. Lev25:4-6). Finally, after seven weeks of years, which is to say forty-nine years, the Jubilee was celebrated as a year of general forgiveness and “liberty throughout the land for all its inhabitants” (cf. Lev25:10). This law came about as an attempt to ensure balance and fairness in their relationships with others and with the land on which they lived and worked. At the same time, it was an acknowledgment that the gift of the earth with its fruits belongs to everyone.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 472-477</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;We fail to see that some are mired in desperate and degrading poverty, with no way out, while others have not the faintest idea of what to do with their possessions, vainly showing off their supposed superiority and leaving behind them so much waste which, if it were the case everywhere, would destroy the planet. In practice, we continue to tolerate that some consider themselves more human than others, as if they had been born with greater rights.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 593-596</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;That is why the New Zealand bishops asked what the commandment “Thou shall not kill” means when “twenty percent of the world’s population consumes resources at a rate that robs the poor nations and future generations of what they need to survive”.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 630-632</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The fact is that “contemporary man has not been trained to use power well”, because our immense technological development has not been accompanied by a development in human responsibility, values and conscience.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 686-688</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;It can be said that many problems of today’s world stem from the tendency, at times unconscious, to make the method and aims of science and technology an epistemological paradigm which shapes the lives of individuals and the workings of society. The effects of imposing this model on reality as a whole, human and social, are seen in the deterioration of the environment, but this is just one sign of a reductionism which affects every aspect of human and social life. We have to accept that technological products are not neutral, for they create a framework which ends up conditioning lifestyles and shaping social possibilities along the lines dictated by the interests of certain powerful groups. Decisions which may seem purely instrumental are in reality decisions about the kind of society we want to build.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 707-712</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Some circles maintain that current economics and technology will solve all environmental problems, and argue, in popular and non-technical terms, that the problems of global hunger and poverty will be resolved simply by market growth. They are less concerned with certain economic theories which today scarcely anybody dares defend, than with their actual operation in the functioning of the economy. They may not affirm such theories with words, but nonetheless support them with their deeds by showing no interest in more balanced levels of production, a better distribution of wealth, concern for the environment and the rights of future generations.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 722-727</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The specialization which belongs to technology makes it difficult to see the larger picture. The fragmentation of knowledge proves helpful for concrete applications, and yet it often leads to a loss of appreciation for the whole, for the relationships between things, and for the broader horizon, which then becomes irrelevant. This very fact makes it hard to find adequate ways of solving the more complex problems of today’s world, particularly those regarding the environment and the poor; these problems cannot be dealt with from a single perspective or from a single set of interests.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 732-736</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;But humanity has changed profoundly, and the accumulation of constant novelties exalts a superficiality which pulls us in one direction. It becomes difficult to pause and recover depth in life. If architecture reflects the spirit of an age, our megastructures and drab apartment blocks express the spirit of globalized technology, where a constant flood of new products coexists with a tedious monotony. Let us refuse to resign ourselves to this, and continue to wonder about the purpose and meaning of everything. Otherwise we would simply legitimate the present situation and need new forms of escapism to help us endure the emptiness.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 756-760</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Nobody is suggesting a return to the Stone Age, but we do need to slow down and look at reality in a different way, to appropriate the positive and sustainable progress which has been made, but also to recover the values and the great goals swept away by our unrestrained delusions of grandeur.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 762-764</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;How can we genuinely teach the importance of concern for other vulnerable beings, however troublesome or inconvenient they may be, if we fail to protect a human embryo, even when its presence is uncomfortable and creates difficulties?&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 797-798</div></div><p>That ship has sailed. Let it go. Think of the living.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;When human beings place themselves at the centre, they give absolute priority to immediate convenience and all else becomes relative. Hence we should not be surprised to find, in conjunction with the omnipresent technocratic paradigm and the cult of unlimited human power, the rise of a relativism which sees everything as irrelevant unless it serves one’s own immediate interests.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 804-807</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;It is also the mindset of those who say: Let us allow the invisible forces of the market to regulate the economy, and consider their impact on society and nature as collateral damage.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 810-811</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;it not the same relativistic logic which justifies buying the organs of the poor for resale or use in experimentation, or eliminating children because they are not what their parents wanted?&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 813-815</div></div><p>Nice try. Keep hammering that point until you drive away allies. Don&rsquo;t die on that hill, Frankie. Not to mention that voluntary non-breeding in the developed world goes a way toward reducing carbon.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;“The Lord created medicines out of the earth, and a sensible man will not despise them”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 823-824</div></div><p>Like RU486?</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;To ensure economic freedom from which all can effectively benefit, restraints occasionally have to be imposed on those possessing greater resources and financial power. To claim economic freedom while real conditions bar many people from actual access to it, and while possibilities for employment continue to shrink, is to practise a doublespeak which brings politics into disrepute.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 857-859</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;There is a tendency to justify transgressing all boundaries when experimentation is carried out on living human embryos.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 905-906</div></div><p>We&rsquo;d almost forgotten where you stand there. </p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;number of countries have a relatively low level of institutional effectiveness, which results in greater problems for their people while benefiting those who profit from this situation.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 946-947</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Moreover, what takes place in any one area can have a direct or indirect influence on other areas. Thus, for example, drug use in affluent societies creates a continual and growing demand for products imported from poorer regions, where behaviour is corrupted, lives are destroyed, and the environment continues to deteriorate.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 951-953</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Unless we struggle with these deeper issues, I do not believe that our concern for ecology will produce significant results. But if these issues are courageously faced, we are led inexorably to ask other pointed questions: What is the purpose of our life in this world? Why are we here? What is the goal of our work and all our efforts? What need does the earth have of us? It is no longer enough, then, simply to state that we should be concerned for future generations. We need to see that what is at stake is our own dignity. Leaving an inhabitable planet to future generations is, first and foremost, up to us. The issue is one which dramatically affects us, for it has to do with the ultimate meaning of our earthly sojourn.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 1056-1061</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;174. Let us also mention the system of governance of the oceans. International and regional conventions do exist, but fragmentation and the lack of strict mechanisms of regulation, control and penalization end up undermining these efforts. The growing problem of marine waste and the protection of the open seas represent particular challenges. What is needed, in effect, is an agreement on systems of governance for the whole range of so-called “global commons”.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 1137-1140</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;178. A politics concerned with immediate results, supported by consumerist sectors of the population, is driven to produce short-term growth. In response to electoral interests, governments are reluctant to upset the public with measures which could affect the level of consumption or create risks for foreign investment.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 1161-1163</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Honesty and truth are needed in scientific and political discussions; these should not be limited to the issue of whether or not a particular project is permitted by law.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 1205-1206</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;If objective information suggests that serious and irreversible damage may result, a project should be halted or modified, even in the absence of indisputable proof. Here the burden of proof is effectively reversed, since in such cases objective and conclusive demonstrations will have to be brought forward to demonstrate that the proposed activity will not cause serious harm to the environment or to those who inhabit it.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 1220-1223</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;187. This does not mean being opposed to any technological innovations which can bring about an improvement in the quality of life. But it does mean that profit cannot be the sole criterion to be taken into account, and that, when significant new information comes to light, a reassessment should be made, with the involvement of all interested parties. The outcome may be a decision not to proceed with a given project, to modify it or to consider alternative proposals.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 1223-1226</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;It could generate intelligent and profitable ways of reusing, revamping and recycling, and it could also improve the energy efficiency of cities. Productive diversification offers the fullest possibilities to human ingenuity to create and innovate, while at the same time protecting the environment and creating more sources of employment. Such creativity would be a worthy expression of our most noble human qualities, for we would be striving intelligently, boldly and responsibly to promote a sustainable and equitable development within the context of a broader concept of quality of life. On the other hand, to find ever new ways of despoiling nature, purely for the sake of new consumer items and quick profit, would be, in human terms, less worthy and creative, and more superficial.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 1255-1260</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;In a word, businesses profit by calculating and paying only a fraction of the costs involved. Yet only when “the economic and social costs of using up shared environmental resources are recognized with transparency and fully borne by those who incur them, not by other peoples or future generations”,[138] can those actions be considered ethical&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 1279-1281</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;This paradigm leads people to believe that they are free as long as they have the supposed freedom to consume. But those really free are the minority who wield economic and financial power.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 1331-1332</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;204. The current global situation engenders a feeling of instability and uncertainty, which in turn becomes “a seedbed for collective selfishness”. When people become self-centred and selfenclosed, their greed increases. The emptier a person’s heart is, the more he or she needs things to buy, own and consume. It becomes almost impossible to accept the limits imposed by reality.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 1334-1336</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Many people know that our current progress and the mere amassing of things and pleasures are not enough to give meaning and joy to the human heart, yet they feel unable to give up what the market sets before them. In those countries which should be making the greatest changes in consumer habits, young people have a new ecological sensitivity and a generous spirit, and some of them are making admirable efforts to protect the environment. At the same time, they have grown up in a milieu of extreme consumerism and affluence which makes it difficult to develop other habits.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 1360-1364</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;A person who could afford to spend and consume more but regularly uses less heating and wears warmer clothes, shows the kind of convictions and attitudes which help to protect the environment.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 1374-1375</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;212. We must not think that these efforts are not going to change the world. They benefit society, often unbeknown to us, for they call forth a goodness which, albeit unseen, inevitably tends to spread. Furthermore, such actions can restore our sense of self-esteem; they can enable us to live more fully and to feel that life on earth is worthwhile.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 1381-1383</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;By learning to see and appreciate beauty, we learn to reject self-interested pragmatism. If someone has not learned to stop and admire something beautiful, we should not be surprised if he or she treats everything as an object to be used and abused without scruple. If we want to bring about deep change, we need to realize that certain mindsets really do influence our behaviour.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 1398-1400</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;It is a return to that simplicity which allows us to stop and appreciate the small things, to be grateful for the opportunities which life affords us, to be spiritually detached from what we possess, and not to succumb to sadness for what we lack. This implies avoiding the dynamic of dominion and the mere accumulation of pleasures. 223. Such sobriety, when lived freely and consciously, is liberating. It is not a lesser life or one lived with less intensity. On the contrary, it is a way of living life to the full. In reality, those who enjoy more and live better each moment are those who have given up dipping here and there, always on the look-out for what they do not have.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 1447-1452</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;That is why it is no longer enough to speak only of the integrity of ecosystems. We have to dare to speak of the integrity of human life, of the need to promote and unify all the great values. Once we lose our humility, and become enthralled with the possibility of limitless mastery over everything, we inevitably end up harming society and the environment.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 1458-1460</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Many people today sense a profound imbalance which drives them to frenetic activity and makes them feel busy, in a constant hurry which in turn leads them to ride rough-shod over everything around them. This too affects how they treat the environment.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 1466-1468</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Desire to do and God&rsquo;s help aren&rsquo;t enough to help people stop doing this. More many, living lives of quite desperation, it&rsquo;s not a choice. Society needs to help people help themselves. There are those who have a choice and they should wrest control of their lives from consumerism.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 1468</div></div>      </div>
      </div>
        <div class="footer">
    <div class="footer-data"><div class="footer-links"><ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/contact.php" title="">Contact</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/support.php" title="">Support</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/privacy.php" title="">Privacy</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/rights.php" title="">Rights</a></li></ul></div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="copyright">Copyright (c) 1999-2026 earthli.com. All Rights Reserved.</div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="versions">Powered by <ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore/app_news.php">earthli News 3.7</a></li><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore" title="">earthli WebCore&trade; 3.7</a></li></ul></div></div>    </div>
      </div>
  </div>  </body>
</html>
]]>
  </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
      <title type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[The Peripheral by William Gibson (2014) (read in 2019)]]>
  </title>
    <id>https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3865</id>
    <link href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3865"/>
    <updated>2019-12-25T22:54:31+01:00</updated>
    <author>
        <name type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[Marco von Ballmoos]]>
  </name>
      <uri>https://earthli.com/users/marco</uri>
    </author>
      <summary type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<blockquote class="quote abstract "><div>Disclaimer: these are notes I took while reading this book. They include citations I found interesting or enlightening or particularly well-written. In some cases, I&rsquo;ve pointed out which of these applies to which citation; in others, I have not. Any benefit you gain from reading these notes is... [<a class="complete-text-link" href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3865">More</a>]</div></blockquote>]]>
  </summary>
      <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<html lang="en">
  <head>
    <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/themes/ice.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/fonts/raleway.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/core/medium.css">
  </head>
  <body>
<div class="style-controls">  <div class="page">
    <div class="page-body">
<div class="info-box-top">
<p>
Published by <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_user.php?name=marco" title="Marco von Ballmoos" class="visible">marco</a> on <span class="date-time">25. Dec 2019 22:54:31 (GMT-5)</span>
</p>
<p>
Updated by <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_user.php?name=marco" title="Marco von Ballmoos" class="visible">marco</a> on <span class="date-time">14. Oct 2022 15:34:28 (GMT-5)</span>
</p>
</div>
      <div class="text-flow wide">
  <blockquote class="quote abstract "><div>Disclaimer: these are notes I took while reading this book. They include citations I found interesting or enlightening or particularly well-written. In some cases, I&rsquo;ve pointed out which of these applies to which citation; in others, I have not. Any benefit you gain from reading these notes is purely incidental to the purpose they serve of reminding me what I once read. Please see Wikipedia for a summary if I&rsquo;ve failed to provide one sufficient for your purposes. If my notes serve to trigger an interest in this book, then I&rsquo;m happy for you.</div></blockquote><p>The story starts with Burton and Flynne, a brother and sister living in the midwest of an alternate near-future United States. The characteristics of the U.S. have other names and are slightly more exaggerated, but it&rsquo;s clearly recognizable (e.g. the chain-store Goliath is called Hefty). Burton has recently gotten a contract with a powerful Colombian corporation called Milagros Coldiron. Burton is &ldquo;playing a game&rdquo; for them, but it seems more like running security via drone. When Burton is due to be out of town, Flynne subs for him, witnessing what looks for all the world like a nanobot-murder. This does not strike them as strange, as video-gaming for pay is common in their world, as is advanced graphics and secret beta-testing.</p>
<p>We meet Ash and Ossian and Wilf Netherton, Lev, the scion of a Russian klept family and Ainsley Lowbeer, an officer of British Law and ancient secret agent. They contact Flynne directly to find out what happened. It turns out to be a bit more complicated than it at first seems. The &ldquo;video game&rdquo; that Burton and Flynne thought they were playing was, in fact, a real-life security detail for the party of one Aelita, sister to performance artist Daedra, ex-fling of Netherton. All of these people are from a future decades away from Flynne and Burton and from a completely different continuum.</p>
<p>The future world is one in which climate change has taken its toll in 80% of the human population. Most animals are gone. From the ashes rose neo-feudalism.</p>
<p>Science improved drastically. Stymied certain problems, like the complete and utter inefficacy of antibiotics. Others it could do nothing about. Technology took off (but too late, as we already know it will be), with &ldquo;peripheral&rdquo; technology (people using remote bodies) and &ldquo;assemblers&rdquo; (nanotechnology) and &ldquo;klepts&rdquo; (quasi-monarchies that are the only power centers left).</p>
<p>The centers are in London and &ldquo;China&rdquo; (in quotes because they don&rsquo;t get any more specific than that). There are also &ldquo;stubs&rdquo;, which is where Flynne and Burton&rsquo;s continuum resides. A stub is an alternate reality accessible through a super-secret and highly shielded Chinese server. The mere act of connecting to the stub, of opening it, changes it irrevocably so that it will never lead to the future that is accessing it.</p>
<p>Essentially, the folks of the alternative future want Flynne&rsquo;s help in identifying the man who was with Aelita when she was killed. Because of the exclusivity of the party, there were no recordings made, so her eyewitness testimony is the only thing that Lowbeer has by way of evidence. The complexly woven structures of power balance and ancient laws and customs of the future make an eyewitness essential—even when they already pretty much know who it was. It will shift the balance of power positively if Flynne can help them.</p>
<p>They get Flynne a peripheral in the future (no mention is made of how they secure the connection or how much data it can carry or … anything. It&rsquo;s better this way). Her brother&rsquo;s friend Connor also gets one, as does her brother, Burton. In Flynne&rsquo;s world, things are moving quickly as well. The movements of Lowbeer&rsquo;s group in the financial markets are becoming noticeable—and there is another entity from the same future, trying to kill them all and erase the remaining witness (Flynne). Their conflicting movements in the world financial markets and in all levels of politics are having a strong effect and threaten to throw Flynne&rsquo;s entire world into a cocked hat.</p>
<p>Flynne&rsquo;s &ldquo;builder&rdquo; friend Macon is gifted and works well with Ash, who provides him with schematics for printing machines and devices that will enable them to communicate with the &ldquo;future&rdquo; better. The more money they get, the more members of the deeply impoverished community of friends and family they drag in with them.</p>
<p>As always with Gibson, he is the master of subtly revealing tremendous detail about a world that feels familiar—obviously derived, or <em>derivable</em>, from ours—but is different in nearly every way. He does this mostly through clever and unutterably <em>cool</em> dialogue. Every character is cool, but also flawed enough to make it seem less ridiculous than when others do it.</p>
<p>It&rsquo;s like he finds the coolness in everyone—which is fair, because who wants to write a book about morons? Still, it doesn&rsquo;t feel as contrived as so many other authors—the only conceit is that he invariably writes about groups of people that include at least one member who is so overwhelmingly wealthy that money is never an issue (in this case Lev Zubov, whose wealth and influence <span class="quote-inline">&ldquo;profiles like a medium-sized nation&rdquo;</span> and Ainsley Lowbeer, who is ancient and privy to every bit of knowledge). While others in the group might be struggling, their coolness enables them to be of use to and under the aegis of the rich and powerful.</p>
<p>Lowbeer has some of the best lines. When asked if she knows <em>everything</em>, she responds:</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;I most certainly don’t. <strong>I feel hindered by a surfeit of information, oceanic to the point of meaninglessness.</strong> The shortcomings of the system are best understood as the result of taking this ocean of data, and the decision points produced by our algorithms, as a near enough substitute for perfect certainty. My own best results are often due to pretending I know relatively little, and acting accordingly, though it’s easier said than done. Far easier. (Emphasis added.)&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>Another interesting aspect of so much of the story being told in dialogue is Gibson&rsquo;s representation of 70 years being far too large a gap for most idiomatic speech to have survived. In that sense, it&rsquo;s more like a first contact between alien cultures, but with the benefit of having more touchstones. They have a shared language, but only a subset, to which both sides must adhere—or run the risk of having to explain too many concepts and too much vocabulary. In that way, it&rsquo;s not unlike native speakers and speakers-of-a-second-language. It works well enough, but you have to adjust, at least at first.</p>
<p>There are a lot of interesting reveals (people in the alternate past who correspond to people in the alternate future) and, once the dust settles and the future folk have defeated their corresponding nemeses in both future and past, they all get down to the business of avoiding the &ldquo;jackpot&rdquo; that more-or-less doomed the future to a high-tech feudalism that&rsquo;s more miserable than it looks, on the surface.</p>
<p>It&rsquo;s pretty upbeat, actually; very Hollywood: good guys win, get all the money in the world, the planet is on a better path. The bad guys are more relegated than destroyed, but they&rsquo;re definitely declawed. It&rsquo;s kind of a fairy tale about the only way to save our planet from being even more of the way it is in the near future: an alternate version of ourselves reaches back over time (still inexplicably, because the tech for doing so isn&rsquo;t explained at all) to deliver the technological solution that we&rsquo;re all relying on to save us—because we aren&rsquo;t going to do it with discipline.</p>
<p>Gibson gets some digs in on popular culture and those who benefit from it, much more obliquely and unobtrusively than others. Flynne ruminates on Daedra, the flighty and arrogant quasi-performance artist from the U.S. of the future:</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Seemed like a cross between a slightly porny media star and what sophomore year Art History called a performance artist, plus maybe a kind of diplomat.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>When Flynne then asks if she&rsquo;s like a reality-show star, Wilf answers:</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;“Yes. She’s descended from that, in a sense. Reality television. It merged with politics. Then with performance art.” They walked on.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>To which Flynne manages to comment on the current-timeline United States without even seeming to do so.</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;“I think that already happened, back home,” she said.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>In the same thought, Gibson sideswipes the U.S. (Connor is basically decent, but more than a little an off-the-rails and shoot-first-and-ask-questions-later guy),</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;But she still didn’t get what the United States did either, in Wilf’s world. <strong>He made it sound like the nation-state equivalent of Conner, minus the sense of humor, but she supposed that might not be so far off, even today.</strong> (Emphasis added.)&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>This is a first-contact story. It doesn&rsquo;t even matter that it&rsquo;s the past, or, more precisely, a different timeline&rsquo;s past. It&rsquo;s a way of telling a feel-good story about a down-on-its-luck pocket of America benefitting from the munificence of Gibson&rsquo;s standard cabal of shadowy, eccentric, surprisingly ethical and nearly incomprehensibly wealthy, powerful, and well-connected characters. It&rsquo;s similar in that way to <em>Pattern Recognition</em>.</p>
<h2>Citations</h2><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Her head was perfectly still, eyes unblinking. He imagined her ego swimming up behind them, to peer at him suspiciously, something eel-like, larval, transparently boned. He had its full attention.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 12</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;“We’re not supposed to like their looks, obviously. The cannibalism’s problematic, if those stories are true, but they did clear the water column, and for virtually no capital outlay on anyone’s part. And they now arguably own the world’s single largest chunk of recycled polymer. Which feels like a country, to me, if not yet a nation-state.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 25</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;She rode to Jimmy’s, letting the hub do most of the work. Went in and sat at the counter, ordered eggs and bacon and toast, no coffee. In the Red Bull mirror behind the counter, the cartoon bull noticed her, winked. She dodged eye contact. She hated it when they spoke to you, called you by your name.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 36</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>He’d wanted to impress her, and what better way than to offer her something money couldn’t buy? Something that had felt to him like a ghost story, when Lev had first explained it.</p>
<p>He’d told her about it in bed. “And they’re dead?” she’d asked.</p>
<p>“Probably.”</p>
<p>“A long time ago?”</p>
<p>“Before the jackpot.”</p>
<p>“But alive, in the past?”</p>
<p>“Not the past. When the initial connection’s made, that didn’t happen, in our past. It all forks, there. They’re no longer headed for this, so nothing changes, here.”</p>
<p>“My bed?” She spread her arms and legs, smiled.</p>
<p>“Our world. History. Everything.”</p>
<p>“And he hires them?”</p>
<p>“Yes.”</p>
<p>“What does he pay them with?”</p>
<p>“Money. Coin of their realm.”</p>
<p>“How does he get it? Does he go there?”</p>
<p>“You can’t go there. Nobody can. But information can be exchanged, so money can be made there.”</p>
<p>“Who did you say this is?”</p>
<p>“Lev Zubov. We were at school together.”</p>
<p>“Russian.”</p>
<p>“Family’s old klept. Lev’s the youngest. Man-child of leisure. Has hobbies, Lev. This is his latest.”</p>
<p>“Why haven’t I heard of it before?”</p>
<p>“It’s new. It’s quiet. Lev looks for new things, things his family might invest in. He thinks this one may be out of Shanghai. Something to do with quantum tunneling.”</p>
<p>“How far back can they go?”</p>
<p>“Twenty twenty-three, earliest. He thinks something changed, then; reached a certain level of complexity. Something nobody there had any reason to notice.”</p>
<p>“Remind me of it later.” She reached for him.</p>
<p>On the walls, the framed flayed hides of three of her most recent selves. Her newest skin beneath him, unwritten.</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 38</div></div><p>This is about as good an example of typical Gibson inscrutability as I&rsquo;ll ever see. He introduces so much background with so few words, making your mind fill in the details of his sketch of a rich alternate reality.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;“They want to kill a dead man in a past that effectively doesn’t exist?” Netherton asked. “Why? You’ve always said that nothing that happens there can affect us.”</p>
<p>&ldquo;“Information,” Lev said, “flows both ways. Someone must believe he knows something. Which, were it available here, would pose a danger to them.”&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 70</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;But there the polt had been, driving, eyes on whatever motorway, seventy-some years earlier, on the far side of the jackpot, his phone something clamped to the dashboard of his car. The polt had had a very broad chest, in a thin white singlet, and was, or so it had struck Netherton in the moment, entirely human. Gloriously pre-posthuman. In a state of nature.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 75</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;It would have been less wise to tell the polt that they were phoning from a future that wasn’t his, one in which he was part of a wealthy obsessive’s hobby set, but hardly more unnecessary.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 76</div></div><p>The &ldquo;stub&rdquo; seems to be some sort of interface to an alternate timeline.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;“It’s a gamelike environment,” he said. “It isn’t real in the sense that…&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 82</div></div><p>The stub.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;There had been a Flynne Fisher in the world’s actual past. If she were alive now, she’d be much older. Though given the jackpot, and whatever odds of survival, that seemed unlikely. But since Lev had only touched her continuum for the first time a few months earlier, this Flynne would still be very like the real Flynne, the now old or dead Flynne, who’d been this young woman before the jackpot, then lived into it, or died in it as so many had. She wouldn’t yet have been changed by Lev’s intervention and whatever that would bring her.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 84</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;She looked at it, from seventy-some years before, in a past that was no longer quite the one that had produced his world, and nodded.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 87</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;“Someone else has access. It stands to reason that whoever it is is better connected than we are, since we’ve absolutely no idea how to get into anyone else’s stub.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 92</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;[Lev:] “You know about the server?” </p>
<p>&ldquo;[Lowbeer:] “The great mystery, yes. Assumed to be Chinese, and as with so many aspects of China today, quite beyond us. You use it to communicate with the past, or rather a past, since in our actual past, you didn’t. That rather hurts my head, Mr. Zubov. I gather it doesn’t hurt yours?”</p>
<p>&ldquo;“Far less than the sort of paradox we’re accustomed to culturally, in discussing imaginary transtemporal affairs,” said Lev. “It’s actually quite simple. The act of connection produces a fork in causality, the new branch causally unique. A stub, as we call them.”&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 102</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;“Who called you?” Burton asked, seated behind Tommy, in the Faraday cage where they put prisoners.</p>
<p>&ldquo;“State AI. Satellite noticed the vehicle hadn’t moved for two hours. Also flagged your property for unusual drone activity, but I told ’em that was you and your friends playing games.”&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 113</div></div><p>Apt description of a hyperactive surveillance state.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;“What have you got listening in, Wilf? It’s enormous. It’s giving my security the cold grue.”</p>
<p>&ldquo;“That would be the family of the friend I’m staying with.”</p>
<p>&ldquo;“He lives in a garage?”</p>
<p>&ldquo;“He has one. Or rather his father does. It goes down and down. And so does their security, evidently.”</p>
<p>&ldquo;“It profiles like a medium-sized nation.”</p>
<p>&ldquo;“That would be them.”</p>
<p>&ldquo;“Is that a problem?” she asked.</p>
<p>&ldquo;“Not so far.”&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 126</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;“Lotta redundancies. Obvious workarounds. We’re being paid to build something they have the real plans for, but we’re building it out of available parts that approximate that, plus other parts we print. Plus some other available parts we modify, print on.” He’d taken his Viz out and put it in his pocket, as had Macon. Professional courtesy.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 129</div></div><p>Their plans are from the future and must be downscaled to work in the past,</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;He’d asked the rental to lead because he had no way, really, of knowing that it was Rainey. Sigils, he knew, could be spoofed. For that matter, he supposed, he had no way of knowing that this was a peripheral. On the other hand, it sounded like her. Not the voice, of course, but it had her manner.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 134</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;“The skulls are modular. Printed bone, assembled with biological adhesives. The structural strength of an average skull, but capable of disassembly.”</p>
<p>&ldquo;“Why is that?” asked Netherton, who just then found peripherals steadily less pleasant the more he learned of them.&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 144</div></div><p>Like the hosts of Westworld.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;They both knew she knew this was bullshit, but she guessed that was the way it went, when somebody you knew killed some people and you didn’t want them to get caught for it. They were teaching her the story as it needed to be told, and telling it to her in a way that wouldn’t require her to tell anything but the truth about what they’d told her.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 147</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;“If this works, and it should, you’ll be controlling their unit full-body, full range of motion, but your body won’t move as you do it. Interesting, how it does that.”</p>
<p>&ldquo;“Why?”</p>
<p>&ldquo;“Because we still can’t find any patents for most of it, and we imagine if there were, they’d be valuable. Very.”&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 166</div></div><p>This is a first-contact story. It doesn&rsquo;t even matter that it&rsquo;s the past, or, more precisely, a different timeline&rsquo;s past. It&rsquo;s a way of telling a feel-good story about a down-on-its-luck pocket of America benefitting from the munificence of Gibson&rsquo;s standard cabal of shadowy, eccentric, surprisingly ethical and nearly incomprehensively wealthy, powerful, and well-connected characters. It&rsquo;s similar in that way to <em>Pattern Recognition</em>.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;“You’re accessing input from an anthropomorphic drone,” the woman said. “A telepresence avatar. You needn’t consciously control it. Don’t try. We’re recalibrating it now. Macon’s device isn’t perfect, but it works.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 175</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;“This isn’t,” he said, “your world.”</p>
<p>&ldquo;“So what is it?” asked Flynne. “A game?”</p>
<p>&ldquo;“The future,” said Netherton, feeling utterly ridiculous. On impulse, he added the year.</p>
<p>&ldquo;“No way.”</p>
<p>&ldquo;“But it isn’t your future,” he said. “When we made contact, we set your world, your universe, whatever it is—”</p>
<p>&ldquo;“Continuum,” said Ash.</p>
<p>&ldquo;“—on a different course,” he finished. He’d never in his life said anything that sounded more absurd, though it was, as far as he knew, the truth.&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 181</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;“Okay,” [Burton] said, and [Flynne] wondered if what she was seeing in his eyes was the Corps’ speed, intensity, violence of action, or his right way of seeing. Because he just got it. Ignored the crazy, went tactically forward. And she saw how weird that was, and how much it was who he was, and for just that instant she wondered if she didn’t somehow have it too.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 192</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;“It isn’t real,” he said. “Worked up from period media. Scarcely anyone you see is human, and those who are, are tourists, or schoolchildren being taught history. Better at night, the illusion.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 198</div></div><p>Again, Westworld.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;perhaps.” She smiled, but not in any way Flynne found comforting.</p>
<p>&ldquo;“Zubov, you should understand, will pervert the economy of your world.”</p>
<p>&ldquo;“It’s pretty fucked anyway,” Flynne said, then wished she’d put it another way. </p>
<p>&ldquo;“I’m familiar with it, so yes, it is, though that isn’t what I mean. I don’t like what these people are doing, these continua hobbyists, Zubov included, though I do find it fascinating. Some might think you more real than I am myself.”</p>
<p>&ldquo;“What does that mean?”</p>
<p>&ldquo;“I’m very old, elaborately and artificially so. I don’t feel entirely real to myself, frankly. But if you agree to assist me, I shall assist you in return, insofar as I can.”&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 200</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;“Thank you,” he said. “You’re easily the most remarkable artist I’ve ever met, Daedra.” Her eyebrows moved fractionally. Not so much approval as a temporary recognition that he might have the capacity to be correct about something.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 238</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;“It’s been a huge help,” he said. “What are you asking me for, Wilf?” “That you allow me to introduce you to her. Again. That I might contribute, in however small a way, to something whose importance I may never fully comprehend.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 239</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;People think the really bad ones are something special, but they’re not,” her mother said, sitting on the edge of her bed, next to the table crowded with meds. “Psycho killers and rapists, they never ruin as many lives as a man like Corbell does. His daddy was a town councilman. Stuck-up boy, Corbell, selfish, but no more than lots that age. Thirty-some years on, he’s ruined more people than he can be bothered to remember, or even know.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 246</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;“It did seem to me that you set the hook. Assuming, that is, that she’s so self-centered as to be literally impaired. I don’t feel I can afford to be quite so readily convinced of that. Perhaps you shouldn’t either, Mr. Netherton.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 251</div></div><p>I love how Lowbeer speaks</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;“Know what ‘collateral damage’ means?”</p>
<p>&ldquo;“People get hurt because they happen to be near something that somebody needs to happen?”</p>
<p>&ldquo;“Think that’s us,” he said. “None of this is happening because any of us are who we are, what we are. Accident, or it started with one, and now we’ve got people who might as well be able to suspend basic laws of physics, or anyway finance, doing whatever it is they’re doing, whatever reason they’re doing it for. So we could get rich, or killed, and it would all still just be collateral.”&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 279</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;“I personally recall that world, which you can only imagine was preferable to this one,” [Lowbeer] said. “Eras are conveniences, particularly for those who never experienced them. We carve history from totalities beyond our grasp. Bolt labels on the result. Handles. Then speak of the handles as though they were things in themselves.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 282</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;“If one has a sufficiently open mind about it, certainly. I was an intelligence officer, early in my career. In a sense I suppose I still am, but today I find myself enabled to undertake investigations, as I see fit. Into, should I so deem them, matters of state security. Simultaneously, I’m a law enforcement officer, or whatever that means in as frank a kleptocracy as ours. I sometimes feel like an antibody, Mr. Netherton. One protecting a disease.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 284</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;And in fact the actual climate, the weather, caused by there being too much carbon, had been the driver for a lot of other things. How that got worse and never better, and was just expected to, ongoing. Because people in the past, clueless as to how that worked, had fucked it all up, then not been able to get it together to do anything about it, even after they knew, and now it was too late.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 320</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;No comets crashing, nothing you could really call a nuclear war. Just everything else, tangled in the changing climate: droughts, water shortages, crop failures, honeybees gone like they almost were now, collapse of other keystone species, every last alpha predator gone, antibiotics doing even less than they already did, diseases that were never quite the one big pandemic but big enough to be historic events in themselves. And all of it around people: how people were, how many of them there were, how they’d changed things just by being there.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 321</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;So everything, however deeply fucked in general, was lit increasingly by the new, by things that made people blink and sit up, but then the rest of it would just go on, deeper into the ditch. A progress accompanied by constant violence, he said, by sufferings unimaginable. She felt him stretch past that, to the future where he lived, then pull himself there, quick, unwilling to describe the worst of what had happened, would happen.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 321</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;A majority of empowered survivors, considering the jackpot, and no doubt their own positions, wanted none of that. Blamed it, in fact.”</p>
<p>&ldquo;“Who runs it, then?”</p>
<p>&ldquo;“Oligarchs, corporations, neomonarchists. Hereditary monarchies provided conveniently familiar armatures. Essentially feudal, according to its critics. Such as they are.”</p>
<p>&ldquo;“The King of England?”</p>
<p>&ldquo;“The City of London,” he said. “The Guilds of the City. In alliance with people like Lev’s father. Enabled by people like Lowbeer.”</p>
<p>&ldquo;“The whole world’s funny?”</p>
<p>&ldquo;She remembered Lowbeer saying that. </p>
<p>&ldquo;“The klept,” he said, misunderstanding her, “isn’t funny at all.”&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 322</div></div><p>Eighty percent dead. Most animals. Science improved drastically. Stymied certain problems, like antibiotics. Others it could do nothing about. From the ashes rose feudality. China and the West.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Mrs. Fearing’s extraordinary topography of wrinkles readjusted slightly. A smile, possibly.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 326</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Hybrid, Wilf said. Something Amazonian, something Indian, and the assemblers to push it all. The bark was like the skin of elephants, finer-textured on the twisted roots.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 346</div></div><p>What about funneling that tech back to the past?</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;He stopped, reading something she couldn’t see. “Yes. She’s descended from that, in a sense. Reality television. It merged with politics. Then with performance art.” They walked on. “I think that already happened, back home,” she said.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 347</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Subtle dig. Very nice. Easily overlooked.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 347</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The tall thing’s round pink head was fronted with a sort of squared-off trumpet, that same pink, through which it blared down, incomprehensibly, at the small crowd of figures surrounding it, at least one of which seemed to be a penguin, though as tall as she was. The tall speaker wore a tight black suit, its arms and legs very narrow.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 349</div></div><p>This imagery reminds of the teachers from The Wall.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;“Consider ignoring the placards our rent-a-zealots are displaying,” he said. “They were designed by an agency that specializes in political attack ads, and are specifically intended to upset you personally, while turning the community against you.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 359</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;“Consider ignoring the placards our rent-a-zealots are displaying,” he said.</p>
<p>&ldquo;“They were designed by an agency that specializes in political attack ads, and are specifically intended to upset you personally, while turning the community against you.”</p>
<p>&ldquo;“The other guys put them up to it?” </p>
<p>&ldquo;“Luke 4:5 are as much a business as a cult. As tends to be the case.”&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 359</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;There were, for instance, Ash said, continua enthusiasts who’d been at it for several years longer than Lev, some of whom had conducted deliberate experiments on multiple continua, testing them sometimes to destruction, insofar as their human populations were concerned.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 362</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;I made a few discreet inquiries. Now anyone I asked about her, however privately, no longer knows me. Retroactively. Never have. Some have gone to the trouble of scrubbing me from group images. As metrics of caution go, that one’s telling.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 367</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;“How would you stop it?”</p>
<p>&ldquo;“By letting her know I’m not going to the party with you, if they do that. They use it, we smash up the crowns, print new phones with different numbers, and pretend you guys don’t exist. Whatever shit comes down, we deal with it. And fuck you. Not you personally. You guys.”</p>
<p>&ldquo;[…]</p>
<p>&ldquo;“You tell her. She wants to talk to me, I’m right here. But they put any party time on those sorry assholes across the road, you’re going to that party alone. Me and my family, we’ll be out of the future business.”&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 375</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;“Lowbeer knows how to fix history?”</p>
<p>&ldquo;“It isn’t history yet, here. She knows, in large part, what really happened here. But now the two have diverged, will continue to. The divergence can be steered, to some extent, but only very broadly. No guarantee of what we’ll ultimately produce.”&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 378</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;“Do you,” Netherton asked, “know literally everything, about everyone?”</p>
<p>&ldquo;“I most certainly don’t. <strong>I feel hindered by a surfeit of information, oceanic to the point of meaninglessness.</strong> The shortcomings of the system are best understood as the result of taking this ocean of data, and the decision points produced by our algorithms, as a near enough substitute for perfect certainty. My own best results are often due to pretending I know relatively little, and acting accordingly, though it’s easier said than done. Far easier.”&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 383</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;She sipped her gin. “As it can all too often seem to be. Waking, I find I must remind myself how the world is now, how it became that way, the role I played in what it became and the role I play today. That I’ve lived on, absurdly long, in the ever-increasing recognition of my mistakes.” </p>
<p>&ldquo;“Mistakes?” </p>
<p>&ldquo;“I suppose I shouldn’t call them that, realistically. Tactically, strategically, in terms of available outcomes, I did the best I could. Rather better, sometimes, it can feel, even today. Civilization was dying, of its own discontents. We live today in the result of what I and so many others did to prevent that. You yourself have known nothing else.”&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 384</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;And seventy-some years on from the year of celebration, he sat at Lev’s grandfather’s desk in the Gobiwagen, the band of the Wheelie-emulator across his forehead, looking back through this clumsy toy at this strange world, in which worn things weren’t meticulously distressed, but actually worn, abraded by their passage through time.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 403</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;“But she was Raeburn then,” said Flynne. “Now.” She was looking at the white tray but not seeing it. Seeing Lowbeer’s hand instead, holding her hat against their quadcopter’s downdraft in the Cheapside street, and Griff’s hands, arranging the Sushi Barn food. “Shit,” she said, then said it again, more softly.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 408</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;“You’re someone who only pretends to be unintelligent,” Netherton said. “It serves you simultaneously as protective coloration and a medium for passive aggression. It won’t work with me.”</p>
<p>&ldquo;“Future’s fucking snippy,” said Leon, to Tacoma. “I didn’t come out here to be abused by vintage product from the Hefty toy department.”&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 409</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;She still wasn’t sure how Daedra made her living, or what her relationship with the United States government was. Seemed like a cross between a slightly porny media star and what sophomore year Art History called a performance artist, plus maybe a kind of diplomat. But she still didn’t get what the United States did either, in Wilf’s world. <strong>He made it sound like the nation-state equivalent of Conner, minus the sense of humor, but she supposed that might not be so far off, even today.</strong>&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 414</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;“Griff. Becomes her. But not exactly. Like this isn’t her past anymore, so he won’t have her life, because none of this happened to her when she was him.”</p>
<p>&ldquo;She started walking.</p>
<p>&ldquo;“You somehow seem,” he said, “to simply accept all these things.”</p>
<p>&ldquo;“You’re the one living in the future, with nanobots eating people, spare bodies, government run by kings and gangsters and shit. You accept all that, right?”</p>
<p>&ldquo;“No,” he said, just before she ducked through, into Hong’s kitchen, “I don’t. I hate it.”&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 435</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;And then they were single-filing the stairway, Ossian behind her.</p>
<p>&ldquo;&ldquo;What’s Conner doing to her?” she asked, over her shoulder.</p>
<p>&ldquo;“Reminding her of the potential of consequences, at least,” said Ossian, “or attempting to. Won’t harm a hair on her head, of course. Or do a bit of good. Father’s a big American.”&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 472</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Coldiron actually had less money now, way less, because as soon as Matryoshka had stumbled, then collapsed, cut off from Sir Henry’s financial modules, Coldiron had started to divest, to get the economy back to something more normal, whatever that meant now. But they still had more money than anyone could understand, or really keep track of. And Griff said that that was good, because they had plenty that needed to be done with it, more than they could know.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 479</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Because people who couldn’t imagine themselves capable of evil were at a major disadvantage in dealing with people who didn’t need to imagine, because they already were. She’d said it was always a mistake, to believe those people were different, special, infected with something that was inhuman, subhuman, fundamentally other. Which had reminded her of what her mother had said about Corbell Picket. That evil wasn’t glamorous, but just the result of ordinary half-assed badness, high school badness, given enough room, however that might happen, to become its bigger self. Bigger, with more horrible results, but never more than the cumulative weight of ordinary human baseness.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 481</div></div>      </div>
      </div>
        <div class="footer">
    <div class="footer-data"><div class="footer-links"><ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/contact.php" title="">Contact</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/support.php" title="">Support</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/privacy.php" title="">Privacy</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/rights.php" title="">Rights</a></li></ul></div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="copyright">Copyright (c) 1999-2026 earthli.com. All Rights Reserved.</div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="versions">Powered by <ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore/app_news.php">earthli News 3.7</a></li><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore" title="">earthli WebCore&trade; 3.7</a></li></ul></div></div>    </div>
      </div>
  </div>  </body>
</html>
]]>
  </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
      <title type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[Everything Belongs to the Future by Laurie Penny (2016) (read in 2019)]]>
  </title>
    <id>https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3857</id>
    <link href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3857"/>
    <updated>2019-12-09T07:42:29+01:00</updated>
    <author>
        <name type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[Marco von Ballmoos]]>
  </name>
      <uri>https://earthli.com/users/marco</uri>
    </author>
      <summary type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<blockquote class="quote abstract "><div>Disclaimer: these are notes I took while reading this book. They include citations I found interesting or enlightening or particularly well-written. In some cases, I&rsquo;ve pointed out which of these applies to which citation; in others, I have not. Any benefit you gain from reading these notes is... [<a class="complete-text-link" href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3857">More</a>]</div></blockquote>]]>
  </summary>
      <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<html lang="en">
  <head>
    <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/themes/ice.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/fonts/raleway.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/core/medium.css">
  </head>
  <body>
<div class="style-controls">  <div class="page">
    <div class="page-body">
<div class="info-box-top">
<p>
Published by <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_user.php?name=marco" title="Marco von Ballmoos" class="visible">marco</a> on <span class="date-time">9. Dec 2019 07:42:29 (GMT-5)</span>
</p>
</div>
      <div class="text-flow wide">
  <blockquote class="quote abstract "><div>Disclaimer: these are notes I took while reading this book. They include citations I found interesting or enlightening or particularly well-written. In some cases, I&rsquo;ve pointed out which of these applies to which citation; in others, I have not. Any benefit you gain from reading these notes is purely incidental to the purpose they serve of reminding me what I once read. Please see Wikipedia for a summary if I&rsquo;ve failed to provide one sufficient for your purposes. If my notes serve to trigger an interest in this book, then I&rsquo;m happy for you.</div></blockquote><p>This is a novella about a future in which an enterprising group of scientists have invented pills that not only extend life, but also regress signs of aging to any desired age. The main inventor of the drug is Alice, who lives a life of luxury, but not satisfaction. With her emeritus status at her company, she isn&rsquo;t at any risk, but with her contrary attitude, she is no longer in as much favor as she once was, 90 years ago.</p>
<p>At a fancy, rich party, she meets a group of activists who&rsquo;ve snuck in disguised as staff. They&rsquo;re there to steal the little pills that prolong life. They give them away to the poor. Alice pulls them to the side, letting them know that she&rsquo;s onto their little scheme, but that she won&rsquo;t turn them in. Instead, she wants to work with them to produce something better, something that supersedes her work on the anti-aging pill, something that will put right the massive changes to society that her original invention engendered.</p>
<p>The invention of that original pill cemented the rich&rsquo;s stranglehold over the poor. Not only did they have more money, but now they had more <em>time</em>. The gap widened and widened. Alice&rsquo;s dissatisfaction grew, as did her desire to throw a monkey wrench into the works. She sets up a lab at the activists&rsquo; house and spends all of her time there and with them.</p>
<p>Alex is Nina&rsquo;s boyfriend. Nina is hardcore; Alex less so. In fact, Alex is a plant, a spy for Parker, Alice&rsquo;s partner at the company that they founded together. Alex has been working this particular group for three years, partnered with Nina and basically fucking her under false pretenses. Nina is a true radical—she doesn&rsquo;t want to live forever and feels that the ability to extend life nearly indefinitely has ruined what it means to be human. Alex is in love with her, but doesn&rsquo;t understand her—he wants to donate to her the years he earns as a spy.</p>
<p>The police raid their house, determined to seize Alice&rsquo;s work, but Margaret eats it, immediately showing its effects: she desiccates and dies, aging eighty years in seconds. They escape the police but now all know what Alice&rsquo;s secret weapon is. Just as her original invention granted extra years, her ultimate invention can take them away. She calls it the Time Bomb.</p>
<p>Despite Alex&rsquo;s efforts to deter them, the crew is determined to use the weapon on the rich. They sneak in to a high-level dinner and Nina triggers the bomb, aging all of the others but also herself in the process, but not to death. She is arrested.</p>
<p>Some of the chapters are in the form of letters to Alice from Nina. Alice didn&rsquo;t age as much because of her century of treatments. Alex aged as well. He still loves Nina. She doesn&rsquo;t care. She got what she wanted: the rich are no longer secure in their colonial control of the poor, with a surfeit of time. The rich now have something to fear as well—not just slow, natural aging and death, but a jetpack into geriatrics.</p>
<h2>Citations</h2><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;For generations, the elected and unelected leaders of the world had weighed the cost of averting drastic climate change via collective, immediate and lasting technological investment against the considerable inconvenience to their personal lifestyles, done some calculations on the back of a napkin and come up with the answer that it was somebody else’s problem.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 23</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Everyone Alex had ever known had died too young, although he struggled to think of anyone of whom you could definitely, absolutely say, “That was old enough.” All death was untimely. If that was changing, he wanted in.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 44</div></div><p>We&rsquo;re supposed to accept this as unimpeachable, but it&rsquo;s silly. Most people have lived enough relatively quickly. Just eating, shitting, breathing, killing time. Not that they shouldn&rsquo;t continue to do so, but it&rsquo;s hard to argue they haven&rsquo;t had enough.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;It was probably just personal prejudice—over seven decades of dealing with their bullshit, she had found it simplest to mistrust every cocky white guy she met. She had probably missed out on some great friendships in the process, but overall it saved time: cocky and insecure all at once, always needing their egos stroked, blind to their own power, white boys were always going to let you down or fuck you over.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 62</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;“Don’t you see? You don’t have to be making bombs to be an extremist these days. You just have to have the wrong thoughts. And now they can make sure we all die out.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 69</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;“I realize it’s an escalation,” said Nina, “and I realize it’s the kind of intervention we’ve never considered before. But me, I hate this town. I hate these people. I hate the suits and I hate the scholars and I hate the state and I hate the way they take everything from you piece by piece until there’s nothing left and I hate it that my friend died and it doesn’t even fucking matter.”</p>
<p>&ldquo;She was staring at her hands. Her voice was flat and a little frightening.</p>
<p>&ldquo;“All I wanted was to make something small and bright and good, something that lasted a little while, a little while longer than I did. All I wanted was to push back against the darkness just a little bit. To live in the cracks in capitalism with the people I care about, just for a little while. But it turns out I can’t even have that. And now I just want to burn shit down.”&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 93</div></div><p>This is the level of alienation that causes terror.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;What else are we supposed to do? Just give up? Slink off into anxious little corners and tear each other’s hearts apart and drink and smoke and screw and die? This doesn’t end well, you know, whatever we do. We’re already fucked. Pointlessly, monumentally fucked. This way, at least we get to decide what kind of fucked we’re going to be.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 94</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;“You have taken what was not yours to take. You have put a price on what was not yours to buy. You have taken years, and months, and days. Years of life, from billions of people. You haven’t shed any blood, but you’re still murderers. You have stolen our years, our months, our days. Our moments to live and love and breathe. And now we’re going to steal them back.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 103</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;People are setting off time bombs in New York now. In Paris, in Johannesburg. In fucking Cardiff. Terrorism, and nothing else, that’s what they call it—pure criminality, floating free of politics into pure, abstract fear, clean and convenient. But what does that mean, when everything else they don’t want to think about gets called terrorism, too? Teenagers writing slogans on the walls. Schoolkids reading the wrong books.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 106</div></div>      </div>
      </div>
        <div class="footer">
    <div class="footer-data"><div class="footer-links"><ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/contact.php" title="">Contact</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/support.php" title="">Support</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/privacy.php" title="">Privacy</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/rights.php" title="">Rights</a></li></ul></div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="copyright">Copyright (c) 1999-2026 earthli.com. All Rights Reserved.</div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="versions">Powered by <ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore/app_news.php">earthli News 3.7</a></li><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore" title="">earthli WebCore&trade; 3.7</a></li></ul></div></div>    </div>
      </div>
  </div>  </body>
</html>
]]>
  </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
      <title type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[Cumulus by Eliot Peper (2016) (read in 2019)]]>
  </title>
    <id>https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3862</id>
    <link href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3862"/>
    <updated>2019-12-08T18:53:58+01:00</updated>
    <author>
        <name type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[Marco von Ballmoos]]>
  </name>
      <uri>https://earthli.com/users/marco</uri>
    </author>
      <summary type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<blockquote class="quote abstract "><div>Disclaimer: these are notes I took while reading this book. They include citations I found interesting or enlightening or particularly well-written. In some cases, I&rsquo;ve pointed out which of these applies to which citation; in others, I have not. Any benefit you gain from reading these notes is... [<a class="complete-text-link" href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3862">More</a>]</div></blockquote>]]>
  </summary>
      <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<html lang="en">
  <head>
    <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/themes/ice.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/fonts/raleway.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/core/medium.css">
  </head>
  <body>
<div class="style-controls">  <div class="page">
    <div class="page-body">
<div class="info-box-top">
<p>
Published by <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_user.php?name=root" title="(withheld)" class="visible">root</a> on <span class="date-time">8. Dec 2019 18:53:58 (GMT-5)</span>
</p>
<p>
Updated by <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_user.php?name=marco" title="Marco von Ballmoos" class="visible">marco</a> on <span class="date-time">28. Dec 2019 00:15:44 (GMT-5)</span>
</p>
</div>
      <div class="text-flow wide">
  <blockquote class="quote abstract "><div>Disclaimer: these are notes I took while reading this book. They include citations I found interesting or enlightening or particularly well-written. In some cases, I&rsquo;ve pointed out which of these applies to which citation; in others, I have not. Any benefit you gain from reading these notes is purely incidental to the purpose they serve of reminding me what I once read. Please see Wikipedia for a summary if I&rsquo;ve failed to provide one sufficient for your purposes. If my notes serve to trigger an interest in this book, then I&rsquo;m happy for you.</div></blockquote><p>The title refers to the company that runs everything in an alternate-future/near-future tale of America, in general, but San Fransisco specifically. Cumulus is captained by Huian, a woman of extraordinary ability and multifarious background with an iron will. Cumulus is her baby, built over two decades to not only provide every single possible service but also to delineate the world into regions of &ldquo;have&rdquo; and &ldquo;have not&rdquo;.</p>
<p>It&rsquo;s the ultimate libertarian wet dream: one company runs everything, but everyone accepts this without question—except for the poor who can&rsquo;t afford its services. It is the NSA, Google, Uber and Blackwater/Xe rolled into one. The government has no power over it, as it consolidates its competitors, strong-arms everyone and imposes Huian&rsquo;s utopic vision on humanity, for its own good.</p>
<p>This is how the book starts.</p>
<p>Soon, we meet Lilly, a &ldquo;Slummer&rdquo; (someone who lives outside of the beneficence (but not the aegis) of Cumulus. She is a photographer with a predilection for analog cameras, hired out as a wedding photographer for insolent yuppies from the &ldquo;Green Zone&rdquo;. She ends up meeting Huian on the same day that Huian&rsquo;s wife Vera leaves her.</p>
<p>We also meet Graham, a former spook, who&rsquo;s insinuated himself into Cumulus, convincing Huian that he&rsquo;s indispensable while asserting more and more control over her corporation. He&rsquo;s brought skills honed abroad in war zones and incredibly asymmetric societies home to America, where the Gini coefficient soars and the situation is on the edge of unrest. So Graham is a &ldquo;wolf among sheep&rdquo;, cutting a swath through Oakland and Cumulus. Huian is giving him more and more power as his methods are the only ones that move her agenda forward.</p>
<p>Nothing that happens to Huian or Cumulus is coincidence: Graham is pulling the strings everywhere, manipulating Vera&rsquo;s exit, an acquisition of Tectonix and simultaneously feeding civil-rights lawyer Sara with information about Cumulus while also them &ldquo;taking care&rdquo; of her for Huian.</p>
<p>Frederick is the kingpin of the slums of Oakland, running things efficiently and fairly using drug money. He incites riots against the Green Zone for Sara&rsquo;s murder (she was his lover) while also hunting for revenge.</p>
<p>The book makes some interesting points about how people who think they know and see and hear everything can be controlled by shaping their stream of data. What they’ve convinced themselves is omniscience is actually a lens on reality designed to control their behavior. The hunter becomes the hunted. This applies on only to the myriad sheep in society, but also to Huian and Graham.</p>
<p>Since everything is in Cumulus&rsquo;s cloud, Graham is able to use his root-level &ldquo;Ghost&rdquo; power to cover his tracks everywhere. Everywhere except for Lilly&rsquo;s camera. Using these pictures, Frederick and Lilly come up with an old-school, analog plan to out Graham. This takes him down and almost Cumulus.</p>
<p>Why not Cumulus? Because Huian turns into a socialist in the last 4 seconds of the book, bequeaths a billion-dollar trust to Lilly for investigative journalism, and pledges to give all Cumulus services to Oakland, regardless of their ability to pay, with plans to roll the plan out to the rest of the world. Also, Lilly&rsquo;s blogger co-conspirator is now going to be the love of her life, Graham blew his own brains out and Frederick is in a strategic alliance with Cumulus. Everyone literally lives happily ever after.</p>
<p>There is no sign of climate change in this brave new world and I&rsquo;m not sure what caliber of reader is enthralled with this level of tying up all loose ends. The last line of the book is literally <span class="quote-inline">&ldquo;Lilly’s first love had been photography. But maybe it wouldn’t prove to be her only one after all.&rdquo;</span></p>
<p>I mean, what the actual fuck did I just read? It was interesting enough but quickly plunged downhill to splash in a mess of gibbets at the end. He wastes a ton of text on meal descriptions that aren&rsquo;t at all germane to the plot and includes stuff like:</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;“Are you ready for tomorrow?” asked Lilly. </p>
<p>&ldquo;Huian raised her eyebrows. “I won’t ever be ready for tomorrow,” she said. “But that won’t stop it from arriving anyway.”&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote><p>Barf.</p>
<h2>Citations</h2><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Huian shook her head. Of course, not everyone could afford to live in the Green Zone—at least, not yet. Some had no choice but to rely on crumbling public institutions and infrastructure. But it never failed to amaze her how people could so determinedly stand in the way of their own success. With the touch of a button, anyone could access every book ever written, every course ever taught, every song ever recorded. With that wealth of information never more than a click away, who could excuse failure? From&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 31</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Huian shook her head. Of course, not everyone could afford to live in the Green Zone—at least, not yet. Some had no choice but to rely on crumbling public institutions and infrastructure. But it never failed to amaze her how people could so determinedly stand in the way of their own success. With the touch of a button, anyone could access every book ever written, every course ever taught, every song ever recorded. With that wealth of information never more than a click away, who could excuse failure?&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 31</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Which was why it was so frustrating when obstacles cropped up. People had such trouble giving up their petty intrigues in pursuit of a larger goal. Tectonix would have given her the bargaining chip she needed to sway at least a half dozen senators. Foreign leaders too—oil states were always desperate to reinvigorate the supply of black gold that kept their oligarchies running.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 32</div></div><p>This is probably how the masters of the world think.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The culture of Silicon Valley had surprised him. From afar, it seemed that the region’s success in developing and commercializing advanced technology must stem from intellectual and procedural rigor. Up close, it felt like the modus operandi was, “Ready, fire, aim.” It was a bunch of geeks playing with technology like the whole exercise was an improvisational jazz ensemble. But this jam session had vast implications for the wider world.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 51</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The countries Graham was assigned to were different. There were two groups of people. An overwhelming majority of people lived in abject poverty with no path to bettering their lot, while a tiny minority controlled virtually all the nation’s political and financial resources. The wealthy minority had every incentive to defend the status quo and established an impenetrable moat around themselves to guarantee their fortunes. Privilege was a matter of birth and family. Poverty was deplorable but inevitable. Wealth justified itself.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 53</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The woman shook her head, eyes never leaving the ball. “When you have root access, the digital world is malleable.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 65</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Graham felt just as comfortable here as in the gilded conference rooms of the elite. Hell, it was a serious step up from running ops in godforsaken Mindanao. Even the most poverty-stricken parts of the United States didn’t have endemic dengue and spiders bigger than your hand. He should have made the jump years ago.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 74</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;double-tapped&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 75</div></div><p>I dont think that&rsquo;s what that means.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Letting corporate tycoons pad your campaign coffers was a respected form of corruption. But follow that line to its inevitable conclusion, and it changed who was beholden to whom. Bribes were investments, not gifts. Those investments paid themselves off with favorable policies, government contracts, and a friendly ear inside the White House. Suddenly the people making the real decisions didn’t even live in Washington. They delegated to Washington. Graham shook his head as he passed through the ticket gate and climbed the stairs up to the platform. American politicians had made the ultimate mistake. They weren’t playing the long game. Instead, they tripped over each other chasing votes and polls and contributions.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 76</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Letting corporate tycoons pad your campaign coffers was a respected form of corruption. But follow that line to its inevitable conclusion, and it changed who was beholden to whom. Bribes were investments, not gifts. Those investments paid themselves off with favorable policies, government contracts, and a friendly ear inside the White House. Suddenly the people making the real decisions didn’t even live in Washington. They delegated to Washington.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 76</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;You didn’t harass tech giants if you weren’t prepared to play in the big leagues. Sara should have known better than to file a nuisance suit that threatened to break up Cumulus. Of course, he had anonymously leaked her the key information about Cumulus that made her case a viable threat. Otherwise, there wouldn’t have been a need to eliminate her, and he would have remained outside Huian’s circle of trust. Powerful people were the easiest to manipulate because they had the most to lose.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 77</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Technology was the only scalable tool available to help shape a better future. The question was whether people chose to participate in that future or not. Huian was a harbinger of that new reality. She would stop at nothing to push forward the inexorable, beautiful, conflicted locomotive of human civilization. Dystopias were the province of the undisciplined.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 87</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;No matter how hard Cumulus worked to build a better world, there were always people complaining. It was all well and good to point out other people’s mistakes, but if you weren’t actually going to step into the arena and present a viable alternative, you might as well just shut up. There were few people who frustrated Huian more than critics who produced nothing but hot air.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 89</div></div><p>Adorable. And accurate.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Karl gestured. “You’re seeing shots from our eye-in-the-sky surveillance drones, Bandwidth Wi-Fi drones, delivery drones, Fleet vehicles, security cameras, and phones that have good angles.” He waved his hand at an adjacent display that was cycling through text far too fast to read and flagging specific words with highlights. “We’re running a full semantic model on any communication coming in or out of the group, audio, text, or passive recording from phones in people’s pockets. Same thing for all the news feeds. That should help monitor the overall temperament of the group and alert us in advance if they enter a downward spiral.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 108</div></div><p>This is interesting because people who think they know and see and hear everything can be controlled by shaping their stream of data. What they&rsquo;ve convinced themselves is omniscience is actually a lens on reality designed to control their behavior. The hunter becomes the hunted.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The real issue here was the country’s long descent into inequality. The changes he had noticed whenever he returned to his homeland had quietly fermented, a vat of perceived social injustice. If you wanted to avert this kind of situation, you needed to start way earlier by correcting the socioeconomic shift. They hadn’t. Which was totally expected. Why would powerful incumbents want to rock the boat and upset a pecking order that benefitted them? The only difference here was that American leaders had gotten soft. They had won their positions in a country that didn’t yet require an iron hand. The middle class had fallen victim to the death of a thousand cuts.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 142</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;I am here to use what authority and resources remain to me to end the violence on the streets of Oakland, and to extend Cumulus services to all residents, regardless of their ability to pay. Will you hear me out?”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 185</div></div><p>Yeah. That was a quick turnaround.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;I built the company to realize a better future for this country, and the world. In so many ways, we have already succeeded. In so many other ways, we have a long way to go.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 186</div></div><p>And in one important way, this is a complete fantasy: no climate change</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The boy returned with two massive ceramic bowls filled to the brim with ramen. The soup sloshed as he thumped them down on the table. Thick slices of pork belly and pork shoulder swam in the rich brown broth. Bright-green scallions and pickled shiitake mushrooms floated above the underlying bed of thick rice noodles. Lilly and Huian scooped up chopsticks in one hand and soup spoons in the other, and went to work. Heads bent close to the table, they slurped through the ramen with singular focus, not looking up until the bowls were empty and their bellies full. They leaned back against the walls of the booth, and Lilly was again struck by the intensity smoldering behind Huian’s eyes.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 191</div></div><p>Boring. Predictable. Flat.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;“Are you ready for tomorrow?” asked Lilly. </p>
<p>&ldquo;Huian raised her eyebrows. “I won’t ever be ready for tomorrow,” she said. “But that won’t stop it from arriving anyway.”&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 191</div></div><p>Jesus. It gets worse.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Lilly’s first love had been photography. But maybe it wouldn’t prove to be her only one after all.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 194</div></div><p>Getting worse. What am I reading?</p>
<p>Oh my God, that was the last sentence of the book. What just happened?</p>
      </div>
      </div>
        <div class="footer">
    <div class="footer-data"><div class="footer-links"><ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/contact.php" title="">Contact</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/support.php" title="">Support</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/privacy.php" title="">Privacy</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/rights.php" title="">Rights</a></li></ul></div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="copyright">Copyright (c) 1999-2026 earthli.com. All Rights Reserved.</div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="versions">Powered by <ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore/app_news.php">earthli News 3.7</a></li><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore" title="">earthli WebCore&trade; 3.7</a></li></ul></div></div>    </div>
      </div>
  </div>  </body>
</html>
]]>
  </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
      <title type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[The Uninhabitable Earth: Life After Warming by David Wallace-Wells (2019) (read in 2019)]]>
  </title>
    <id>https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3796</id>
    <link href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3796"/>
    <updated>2019-12-01T21:47:27+01:00</updated>
    <author>
        <name type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[Marco von Ballmoos]]>
  </name>
      <uri>https://earthli.com/users/marco</uri>
    </author>
      <summary type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<blockquote class="quote abstract "><div>Disclaimer: these are notes I took while reading this book. They include citations I found interesting or enlightening or particularly well-written. In some cases, I&rsquo;ve pointed out which of these applies to which citation; in others, I have not. Any benefit you gain from reading these notes is... [<a class="complete-text-link" href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3796">More</a>]</div></blockquote>]]>
  </summary>
      <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<html lang="en">
  <head>
    <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/themes/ice.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/fonts/raleway.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/core/medium.css">
  </head>
  <body>
<div class="style-controls">  <div class="page">
    <div class="page-body">
<div class="info-box-top">
<p>
Published by <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_user.php?name=marco" title="Marco von Ballmoos" class="visible">marco</a> on <span class="date-time">1. Dec 2019 21:47:27 (GMT-5)</span>
</p>
</div>
      <div class="text-flow wide">
  <blockquote class="quote abstract "><div>Disclaimer: these are notes I took while reading this book. They include citations I found interesting or enlightening or particularly well-written. In some cases, I&rsquo;ve pointed out which of these applies to which citation; in others, I have not. Any benefit you gain from reading these notes is purely incidental to the purpose they serve of reminding me what I once read. Please see Wikipedia for a summary if I&rsquo;ve failed to provide one sufficient for your purposes. If my notes serve to trigger an interest in this book, then I&rsquo;m happy for you.</div></blockquote><p>As you begin this book, you feel it is <em>either</em> an unhinged leftist diatribe of sour grapes trying to convince the masters of the universe that they should switch to socialism and stop what we&rsquo;re doing because it&rsquo;s <em>unfair</em> to the losers <em>or</em> it&rsquo;s an exceedingly well-written and researched manifesto shrieking at us that the effects of the world we&rsquo;ve had designed and built for us are also that which make it certain that this world will not last.</p>
<p>It is, unfortunately, the latter. The world we&rsquo;ve built has its destruction written into its DNA. It is built on a mountain of checks that we cannot cash.</p>
<p>We are boiling ourselves away from the planet, but other, less-evolved species will probably be OK. Everything we eat, though, will be extinct by our hand long before global warming can finish them off. Fish and wildlife have already experienced their catastrophic near-extinction and that had nothing to do with CO<sub>2</sub> and everything to do with humans.</p>
<p>If humans disappear or are significantly diminished, then other species may have a chance again. The ones we knew—and that we&rsquo;ve nearly eliminated—will die with us, as they used the same ecological niche as we did for their crucible. They are just as sensitive as we are to those changes. Many plants will die, but others won&rsquo;t. Many insects will die, but others will thrive. The story of climate change is the story not of life dying out, but of intelligent life making its home so inhospitable for itself that, in the end, it check-mates itself.</p>
<p>Wallace-Wells is an eloquent teller of this tale of mankind&rsquo;s downfall. In the citations below, you&rsquo;ll find many thoughtful and evocative descriptions that enhance the dry data of our demise. Even when we actually scream from the hilltops, it&rsquo;s ignored, as Wallace-Wells states so eloquently:</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Rhetoric often fails us on climate because the only factually appropriate language is of a kind we’ve been trained, by a buoyant culture of sunny-side-up optimism, to dismiss, categorically, as hyperbole.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>He employs this talent to interpret the data in a way that we can imagine: what does a world of 2ºC (warming over average temperatures before the industrial age) look like? How about 4ºC? Is any of it livable? With the population we have now? Wallace-Wells makes clear that, for the first time in history, mankind&rsquo;s habitable surface area is <em>shrinking</em>.</p>
<p>Don&rsquo;t be fooled, though: He isn&rsquo;t a classic die-hard environmentalist. In fact, he clearly states that,</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;I may be in the minority in feeling that the world could lose much of what we think of as “nature,” as far as I cared, so long as we could go on living as we have in the world left behind.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>I personally feel that this is a reprehensible thing to say, but the author is probably just a city-dweller who doesn&rsquo;t even know what nature is. At any rate, it was a one-off comment that he made before acknowledging that his dream of living on Cybertron is not a reality on Earth.</p>
<p>His thesis statement for the book is basically as follows,</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;We have all already left behind the narrow window of environmental conditions that allowed the human animal to evolve in the first place, but not just evolve—that window has enclosed everything we remember as history, and value as progress, and study as politics. What will it mean to live outside that window, probably quite far outside it? That reckoning is the subject of this book.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>In another example, he savages Bitcoin for using as much power as solar energy has given us total. So much waste, so little time.</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Market forces have delivered cheaper and more widely available green energy, but the same market forces have absorbed those innovations, which is to say profited from them, while continuing to grow emissions.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>Since Bitcoin is eating up the surplus generated by solar, Wallace-Wells explains:</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Solar isn’t eating away at fossil fuel use, in other words, even slowly; it’s just buttressing it. To the market, this is growth; to human civilization, it is almost suicide. We are now burning 80 percent more coal than we were just in the year 2000.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>Wallace-Wells moves on to explain the injustice of <em>how</em> the so-called developed world has built its empire on the backs of the poor: first, exploiting them and their lands to burn the planet and second, to watch as they also bear the (initial) brunt of the chaos their world has wrought.</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;In the postindustrial West, we try not to think about these bargains, which have benefited us so enormously. […] given the devastation that wealth has imposed on the world of natural wonder it conquered and the suffering of those, elsewhere on the planet, left behind in the race to endless material comforts. And asked, functionally, to pay for them.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>The environmental catastrophe hits not just in temperature increase but in drastic reduction of drinking water, crop yields, and an astonishing increase in pollution.</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;But of all urban entitlements, the casual expectation of never-ending drinking water is perhaps the most deeply delusional. It takes quite a lot to bring that water to your sink, your shower, and your toilet.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>He discusses the Syrian &ldquo;civil war&rdquo; as if there had been no goading or machination from self-interested, western powers, exacerbating a climate crisis for which they are largely responsible with fomented warfare intended to consolidate power over more oil-production.</p>
<p>People always talk of terrorism as if it just appears and lashes out when a state fails. The so-called terrorists do not attack indiscriminately. They generally terrorize within their own borders, against occupying powers. No mention of state terror that engenders it all. Or the massive climate costs they incur in doing so. His analysis is weak and incomplete here. It doesn&rsquo;t have to be exhaustive, but he can&rsquo;t just toss out these little sentences to make a vague point that comes to an utterly fallacious conclusion.</p>
<p>The market rules, though. People move to stupid places for stupid, short-sighted, and selfish reasons. Communities respond by attracting and accommodating the wealthy. They bring water to places where the energy investment to do so is many times more than the place from which the water was originally destined.</p>
<p>He goes on to discuss not just the water crisis (saying we would be bad enough off without one, but we definitely have one…and it&rsquo;s going to get worse), but also the air-pollution crisis, which is basically untenable in any of the larger cities in which 70% of the world&rsquo;s population lives. Not only pollution, but also malnutrition, will guarantee that most of the world&rsquo;s human population will be dead weight, incapable of helping us think our way out of this crisis—because the crisis has stifled their mental and physical development.</p>
<p>Even if they were able to think straight, there&rsquo;s nothing to eat, the bugs are dying, the crops are failing and factory-farming is going to collapse under its own weight. </p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Twenty-two percent of the earth’s landmass was altered by humans just between 1992 and 2015. Ninety-six percent of the world’s mammals, by weight, are now humans and their livestock; just four percent are wild.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>No pollinators, no food, no people, so other predictions of growth are strongly countered. Unless mankind flails in a paroxysm of energy use to dwarf all efforts heretofore to try to cover the gap, which will also end things even more quickly than they otherwise would.</p>
<p>Sometimes he presents numbers too drily:</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Compared to the trajectory of economic growth with no climate change, their average projection is for a 23 percent loss in per capita earning globally by the end of this century.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>In this case, he could be somewhat optimistic that at least this will likely lead to less emissions. Naturally, people will suffer and die, but they will do so anyway. At least if they die in the service of a shrinking economy, mankind ends up with less energy use rather than more. It&rsquo;s far from an ideal solution—it&rsquo;s not even a solution, really, at all—but it&rsquo;s not like a tragedy.</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;And to help buffer or offset the impacts, we have no New Deal revival waiting around the corner, no Marshall Plan ready.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>What could we do? Everything we could do involves energy, extraction, and manufacturing. Every move we make to fix the problem likely makes it worse. Use solar to get free energy? Manufacturing panels is counterproductive (although, according to Bill McKibben in <em>Falter</em>, it&rsquo;s gotten much, much better: panels last for 25 years and the energy investment is amortized in 5 years).</p>
<p>It&rsquo;s far too late for nuclear, considering the manufacturing and concrete involved, even if the budgeting and construction fiascoes could be magically bypassed. The nuclear-waste problem is much better than it was: newer reactors are much more efficient and capable of re-burning and -processing much more its own waste. Even current reactors really produce much less waste and pollution than fossil fuels, which are actively killing us by raising temperature, rather than <em>possibly, eventually</em> killing us with radiation sickness. At this point, it&rsquo;s really about triage.</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Hitting four degrees of warming, which lies on the low end of the range of warming implied by our current emissions trajectory, would cut into it by 30 percent or more. This is a trough twice as deep as the deprivations that scarred our grandparents in the 1930s, and which helped produce a wave of fascism, authoritarianism, and genocide.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>Yes, but losing 15% of 1000 is more devastating than 30% of 50,000. They suffered because they were closer to death to begin with. We fall farther, but still land much higher.</p>
<p>He (like Bill McKibben) tears into the Pinker line of reasoning that things, in fact, have been getting better and we should lean back and appreciate all that our system of ruling the world has given us. </p>
<p>Now I finally realize what annoys me so much about Pinker&rsquo;s argument: the rate of progress was unsustainable and unevenly distributed. The blowback when the wave crashes will hit everyone but Pinker and his cohort. It&rsquo;s like a student cramming for a test that won&rsquo;t remember 90%; the current situation incurs unrealistic expectations. Basically, our progress was obtained on credit and the bill is coming due.</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;But we close them off when we say anything about the future being inevitable. What may sound like stoic wisdom is often an alibi for indifference.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>Despite everything Wallace-Wells has written, he dares chastise those who, with clear eyes, don&rsquo;t see much hope. It doesn&rsquo;t mean we stop trying, but roundly &ldquo;Fuck you&rdquo; for calling us indifferent. He knows all that he wrote in this book: it&rsquo;s fucking hopeless. We have not acted. We have instead doubled down. We will not change. Wallace-Wells bred anyway (he has a child) and is now trying to justify it by pretending—despite all the evidence to the contrary that he himself has presented—that it&rsquo;s not hopeless. He knows his child will not really suffer because she is in the elite conquerors most responsible but least affected.</p>
<p>Don&rsquo;t you dare condemn pragmatic realism as indifference, sir. If I fall off a cliff, gravity reigns whether I want it to or not. My inaction is not indifference. It&rsquo;s acceptance. Parents have to spin themselves fairy tales. Don&rsquo;t expect me to buy their self-consoling bullshit.</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;[…] such as the promise that human life will endure, […]&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>It probably will, but in a nearly unrecognizable form. We will be demoted to colonists on our home planet.</p>
<p>He continues digging, addressing the suicidal theory of economics that we&rsquo;ve chosen to honor as the one true God.</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Behavioral economics is unusual as a contrarian intellectual movement in that it overturns beliefs—namely, in the perfectly rational human actor—that perhaps only its proponents ever truly believed, and maybe even only as economics undergraduates.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>But everyone is still trapped by this backward thinking, that <span class="quote-inline">&ldquo;we tend to think of climate as somehow being contained within, or governed by, capitalism. In fact, the opposite: capitalism is endangered by climate.&rdquo;</span></p>
<p>And our stumbling, foolish way of running things isn&rsquo;t nearly efficient enough—not even close. There is no time anymore to let good things happen as a side-effect of a few people making a fuck-ton of money. </p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;It took New York City forty-five years to build three new stops on a single subway line; the threat of catastrophic climate change means we need to entirely rebuild the world’s infrastructure in considerably less time.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>Next up is technological rapturism: people think that they can escape our ruined world by flying to other planets or by uploading themselves into software (though where the energy comes from to keep running that simulation is a thorny problem).</p>
<p>This is all bullshit, though. We know what we have to do. Eat the rich.</p>
<p>As Wallace-Wells writes,</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;If the world’s most conspicuous emitters, the top 10 percent, reduced their emissions to only the E.U. average, total global emissions would fall by 35 percent.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;United States and Europe, where emissions have already flattened out and will likely begin their decline soon—though how dramatic a decline, and how soon, is very much up in the air.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>Here he conveniently forgets the matter of justice and the fact that the US has &ldquo;flattened out&rdquo; at 2.25 times Europe, which is at 2 times China. There&rsquo;s a lot of savings to be had by reducing them. The prior quote that says that reducing the worst 10% to EU levels would reduce the burden by 35% applies to mostly UAE and US citizens. This is also ignoring the fact that European and U.S. lifestyles are buttressed by industry in China. You can&rsquo;t just offload your carbon emissions by killing your own manufacturing but still increasing consumption. They&rsquo;re still technically your carbon emissions if your consumption is the only thing driving that production.</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;[…] a large slice of China’s emissions is produced manufacturing goods to be consumed by Americans and Europeans.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>He argues that we need to <span class="quote-inline">&ldquo;shake the casual sense that as time marches forward, life improves ineluctably&rdquo;</span>, but this is an elite opinion anyway. Most haven&rsquo;t felt and don&rsquo;t feel these effects anyway. It was always a myth for 95% of humanity.</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;[…] warming at the level necessary to fully melt ice sheets and glaciers and elevate sea level by several hundred feet promises to initiate rolling, radically transformative changes on a timescale measured not in decades or centuries or even millennia, but in the millions of years.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>On that scale, our cradle environment, what we cherish, will be long gone. Even the memory of it will be long gone. By the time the planet is once again able to offer conditions similar to those of fifty years ago, mankind will no longer be interested or will fight it.</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;As Swedish journalist Torill Kornfeldt asks […] “Why should nature as it is now be of any greater value than the natural world of 10,000 years ago, or the species that will exist 10,000 years from now?”&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>Good question, in absolute terms. However, its value to us, now, is much higher, as we are stuck at one point on time&rsquo;s arrow. Perhaps we sacrifice now so that 10,000 years from now is nicer, but we&rsquo;re not doing that either.</p>
<p>In the end, though, there is no more discussion needed.</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;[…] the world has, at most, about three decades to completely decarbonize before truly devastating climate horrors begin. You can’t halfway your way to a solution to a crisis this large.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>We have to abandon everything we know about capitalism as we do it today. It is a crooked kleptocracy that only ever threw enough crumbs to keep its subjects from rising up. As summarized by George Orwell in The Road to Wigan Pier:</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The world is a raft sailing through space with, potentially, plenty of provisions for everybody; the idea that we must all cooperate and see to it that everyone does his fair share of the work and gets his fair share of the provisions seems so blatantly obvious that one would say that no one could possibly fail to accept it unless he had some corrupt motive for clinging to the present system.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><h2>Citations</h2><p><small class="notes">In the citations below, all emphases are added.</small></p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;The most notorious [extinction] was 250 million years ago; it began when carbon dioxide warmed the planet by five degrees Celsius, accelerated when that warming triggered the release of methane, another greenhouse gas, and ended with all but a sliver of life on Earth dead.</p>
<p>&ldquo;<strong>We are currently adding carbon to the atmosphere at a considerably faster rate; by most estimates, at least ten times faster.</strong> The rate is one hundred times faster than at any point in human history before the beginning of industrialization. And there is already, right now, fully a third more carbon in the atmosphere than at any point in the last 800,000 years—perhaps in as long as 15 million years. There were no humans then. The oceans were more than a hundred feet higher.&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 3</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;In these ways—many of them, at least—I am like every other American who has spent their life fatally complacent, and willfully deluded, about climate change, which is not just the biggest threat human life on the planet has ever faced but a threat of an entirely different category and scale. That is, the scale of human life itself.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 7</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;But that those bigger numbers are only the far upper reaches of what is possible should not lull us into complacency; <strong>when we dismiss the worst-case possibilities, it distorts our sense of likelier outcomes, which we then regard as extreme scenarios we needn’t plan so conscientiously for</strong>. High-end estimates establish the boundaries of what’s possible, between which we can better conceive of what is likely. And perhaps they will prove better guides even than that, considering the optimists have never, in the half century of climate anxiety we’ve already endured, been right.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 8</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;In 2016, the Paris accords established two degrees as a global goal, and, to read our newspapers, that level of warming remains something like the scariest scenario it is responsible to consider; just a few years later, with no single industrial nation on track to meet its Paris commitments, two degrees looks more like a best-case outcome, at present hard to credit, with an entire bell curve of more horrific possibilities extending beyond it and yet shrouded, delicately, from public view.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 9</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;[…] because we liked driving our cars and eating our beef and living as we did in every other way and didn’t want to think too hard about that; or because we felt so “postindustrial” we couldn’t believe we were still drawing material breaths from fossil fuel furnaces. Perhaps it was because we were so sociopathically good at collating bad news into a sickening evolving sense of what constituted “normal,” or because we looked outside and things seemed still okay.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 10</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;At two degrees, the ice sheets will begin their collapse, 400 million more people will suffer from water scarcity, major cities in the equatorial band of the planet will become unlivable, and even in the northern latitudes heat waves will kill thousands each summer. <strong>There would be thirty-two times as many extreme heat waves in India, and each would last five times as long, exposing ninety-three times more people. This is our best-case scenario.</strong>&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 12</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;But time is perhaps the most mind-bending feature, the worst outcomes arriving so long from now that we reflexively discount their reality.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 13</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The truth is actually much scarier. That is, the end of normal; never normal again. We have already exited the state of environmental conditions that allowed the human animal to evolve in the first place, in an unsure and unplanned bet on just what that animal can endure. The climate system that raised us, and raised everything we now know as human culture and civilization, is now, like a parent, dead.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 18</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;[…] however sanguine you might be about the proposition that we have already ravaged the natural world, which we surely have, it is another thing entirely to consider the possibility that we have only provoked it, <strong>engineering first in ignorance and then in denial a climate system that will now go to war with us for many centuries, perhaps until it destroys us.</strong>&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 20</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;<strong>If you had to invent a threat grand enough, and global enough, to plausibly conjure into being a system of true international cooperation, climate change would be it—the threat everywhere, and overwhelming, and total.</strong> And yet now, just as the need for that kind of cooperation is paramount, indeed necessary for anything like the world we know to survive, we are only unbuilding those alliances—recoiling into nationalistic corners and retreating from collective responsibility and from each other. That collapse of trust is a cascade, too.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 25</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Rhetoric often fails us on climate because the only factually appropriate language is of a kind we’ve been trained, by a buoyant culture of sunny-side-up optimism, to dismiss, categorically, as hyperbole.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 29</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Global warming has improbably compressed into two generations the entire story of human civilization. First, the project of remaking the planet so that it is undeniably ours, a project whose exhaust, the poison of emissions, now casually works its way through millennia of ice so quickly you can see the melt with a naked eye, destroying the environmental conditions that have held stable and steadily governed for literally all of human history.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 29</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Over the last few years, as the planet’s own environmental rhythms have seemed to grow more fatalistic, skeptics have found themselves arguing not that climate change isn’t happening, since extreme weather has made that undeniable, but that its causes are unclear—suggesting that the changes we are seeing are the result of natural cycles rather than human activities and interventions. <strong>It is a very strange argument; if the planet is warming at a terrifying pace and on a horrifying scale, it should transparently concern us more, rather than less, that the warming is beyond our control, possibly even our comprehension.</strong>&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 30</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Some, like our oil companies and their political patrons, are more prolific authors than others. But the burden of responsibility is too great to be shouldered by a few, however comforting it is to think all that is needed is for a few villains to fall. <strong>Each of us imposes some suffering on our future selves every time we flip on a light switch, buy a plane ticket, or fail to vote. Now we all share the responsibility to write the next act.</strong> We found a way to engineer devastation, and we can find a way to engineer our way out of it—or, rather, engineer our way toward a degraded muddle, but one that nevertheless extends forward the promise of new generations finding their own way forward, perhaps toward some brighter environmental future.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 30</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The project of unplugging the entire industrial world from fossil fuels is intimidating, and must be done in fairly short order—by 2040, many scientists say. But in the meantime many avenues are open—wide open, if we are not too lazy and too blinkered and too selfish to embark upon them. Fully half of British emissions, it was recently calculated, come from inefficiencies in construction, discarded and unused food, electronics, and clothing; two-thirds of American energy is wasted; globally, according to one paper, we are subsidizing the fossil fuel business to the tune of $5 trillion each year.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 32</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Five years ago, hardly anyone outside the darkest corners of the internet had even heard of Bitcoin; today mining it consumes more electricity than is generated by all the world’s solar panels combined, which means that in just a few years we’ve assembled, out of distrust of one another and the nations behind “fiat currencies,” a program to wipe out the gains of several long, hard generations of green energy innovation.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 33</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Annihilation is only the very thin tail of warming’s very long bell curve, and there is nothing stopping us from steering clear of it. But what lies between us and extinction is horrifying enough, and we have not yet begun to contemplate what it means to live under those conditions&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 34</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Especially those who have imbibed several centuries of Western triumphalism tend to see the story of human civilization as an inevitable conquest of the earth, rather than the saga of an insecure culture, like mold, growing haphazardly and unsurely upon it.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 34</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;<strong>We have all already left behind the narrow window of environmental conditions that allowed the human animal to evolve in the first place, but not just evolve—that window has enclosed everything we remember as history, and value as progress, and study as politics.</strong> What will it mean to live outside that window, probably quite far outside it? That reckoning is the subject of this book.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 35</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;I may be in the minority in feeling that the world could lose much of what we think of as “nature,” as far as I cared, so long as we could go on living as we have in the world left behind.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 36</div></div><p>Diehard city dweller. My life does not continue without nature.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;That uncertainty is among the most momentous metanarratives that climate change will bring to our culture over the next decades—an eerie lack of clarity about what the world we live in will even look like, just a decade or two down the road, when we will still be living in the same homes and paying the same mortgages, watching the same television shows and making appeals to many of the same justices of the Supreme Court. But while there are a few things science does not know about how the climate system will respond to all the carbon we’ve pumped into the air, the uncertainty of what will happen—that haunting uncertainty—emerges not from scientific ignorance but, overwhelmingly, from the open question of how we respond.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 43</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Three-quarters of a century since global warming was first recognized as a problem, we have made no meaningful adjustment to our production or consumption of energy to account for it and protect ourselves. For far too long, casual climate observers have watched scientists draw pathways to a stable climate and concluded that the world would adapt accordingly; instead, the world has done more or less nothing, as though those pathways would implement themselves. Market forces have delivered cheaper and more widely available green energy, but the same market forces have absorbed those innovations, which is to say profited from them, while continuing to grow emissions.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 43</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;This puts Donald Trump’s commitment to withdraw from the treaty in a useful perspective; in fact, his spite may ultimately prove perversely productive, since the evacuation of American leadership on climate seems to have mobilized China—giving Xi Jinping an opportunity and an enticement to adopt a much more aggressive posture toward climate.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 44</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Globally, coal power has nearly doubled since 2000.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 45</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;In the postindustrial West, we try not to think about these bargains, which have benefited us so enormously. When we do, it is often in the guilty spirit of what critic Kris Bartkus has memorably called “the Malthusian tragic”—namely, our inability to see any remaining innocence in the quotidian life of the well-to-do West, given the devastation that wealth has imposed on the world of natural wonder it conquered and the suffering of those, elsewhere on the planet, left behind in the race to endless material comforts. And asked, functionally, to pay for them.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 54</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;“Of course we did it to ourselves; we had always been intellectually lazy, and the less asked of us, the less we had to say,” he writes. “We all lived for money, and that is what we died for.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 55</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;One hopes these population booms will bring their own Borlaugs, ideally many of them.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 56</div></div><p>Why? From everything he&rsquo;s written, we should drastically reduce the population in order to mitigate suffering. Stop breeding FFS.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;That 260-foot rise is, ultimately, the ceiling—but it is a pretty good bet we will get there eventually. Greenhouse gases simply work on too long a timescale to avoid it, though what kind of human civilization will be around to see that flooded planet is very much to be determined.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 68</div></div><p>Mother of God. It&rsquo;s a science-fiction scenario.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;In the affluent cities of the West, even those conscious of environmental change have spent the last few decades walking our street grids and driving our highways, navigating our superabundant supermarkets and all-everywhere internet and believing that we had built our way out of nature. We have not. A paradise dreamscape erected in a barren desert, L.A. has always been an impossible city, as Mike Davis has so brilliantly written.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 72</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;On local golf courses, the West Coast’s wealthy still showed up for their tee times, swinging their clubs just yards from blazing fires in photographs that could not have been more perfectly staged to skewer the country’s indifferent plutocracy. The following year, Americans watched the Kardashians evacuate via Instagram stories, then read about the private firefighting forces they employed, the rest of the state reliant on conscripted convicts earning as little as a dollar a day.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 73</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;By 2100, floods of that scale are expected as many as seventeen times more often in New York. Katrina-level hurricanes are expected to double in frequency.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 81</div></div><p>Although, in the previous chapter, he wrote that NYC would not exist.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;[…] that 0.007 percent should be, believe it or not, plenty, not just for the seven billion of us here but for as many as nine billion, perhaps even a bit more. Of course, we are likely heading north of nine billion this century, to a global population of at least ten and possibly twelve billion. As with food scarcity, much of the growth is expected in parts of the world already most strained by water shortage—in this case, urban Africa. In many African countries already, you are expected to get by on as little as twenty liters of water each day—less than half of what water organizations say is necessary for public health. As soon as 2030, global water demand is expected to outstrip supply by 40 percent.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 86</div></div><p>Untenable.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;There is no need for a water crisis, in other words, but we have one anyway, and aren’t doing much to address it.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 87</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Sitting in a living room in a modern apartment in an advanced metropolis somewhere in the developed world, this threat may seem hard to credit—so many cities looking nowadays like fantasies of endless and on-demand abundance for the world’s wealthy. But of all urban entitlements, the casual expectation of never-ending drinking water is perhaps the most deeply delusional. It takes quite a lot to bring that water to your sink, your shower, and your toilet.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 89</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Today, at just one degree of warming, those regions with at least a month of water shortages each year include just about all of the United States west of Texas, where lakes and aquifers are being drained to meet demand,&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 91</div></div><p>The market rules. People move to stupid places for stupid, short-sighted, and selfish reasons. Communities respond by attracting and accommodating the wealthy.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The five-year Syrian drought that stretched from 2006 to 2011, producing crop failures that created political instability and helped usher in the civil war that produced a global refugee crisis, is one vivid example.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 93</div></div><p>With no goading or machination from self-interested, western powers, exacerbating a climate crisis for which they are largely responsible with fomented warfare intended to consolidate power over more oil-production.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;With CO2 at 930 parts per million (more than double where we are today), cognitive ability declines by 21 percent.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 100</div></div><p>These numbers are suspiciously precise.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;reducing Chinese pollution to the EPA standard, for instance, would improve the country’s verbal test scores by 13 percent and its math scores by 8 percent.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 101</div></div><p>More suspiciously precise numbers.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;That year, smog was responsible for 1.37 million deaths in the country.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 102</div></div><p>So much biomass to dispose of.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;In the developing world, 98 percent of cities are enveloped by air above the threshold of safety established by the WHO. Get out of urban areas and the problem doesn’t much improve: 95 percent of the world’s population is breathing dangerously polluted air. Since 2013, China has undertaken an unprecedented cleanup of its air, but as of 2015 pollution was still killing more than a million Chinese each year. Globally, one out of six deaths is caused by air pollution.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 104</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;In New England, dead moose calves have been found suckling as many as 90,000 engorged ticks, often killing the calves not through Lyme disease but simple anemia, the effect of that number of bugs each drawing a few milliliters of blood from the moose. Those that survive are far from robust, many having scratched so incessantly at their own hides to clear it of ticks that they completely eliminated their own hair, leaving behind a spooky gray skin that has earned them the name “ghost moose.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 112</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Compared to the trajectory of economic growth with no climate change, their average projection is for a 23 percent loss in per capita earning globally by the end of this century.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 117</div></div><p>Good.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Tracing the shape of the probability curve is even scarier. There is a 51 percent chance, this research suggests, that climate change will reduce global output by more than 20 percent by 2100, compared with a world without warming, and a 12 percent chance that it lowers per capita GDP by 50 percent or more by then, unless emissions decline. By comparison, the Great Depression dropped global GDP by about 15 percent, it is estimated&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 117</div></div><p>Whats the problem? Are we supposed to grow no matter what? Isn&rsquo;t that the problem?</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;And to help buffer or offset the impacts, we have no New Deal revival waiting around the corner, no Marshall Plan ready.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 118</div></div><p>What could we do? Everything we could do involves energy, extraction, and manufacturing. Every move we make to fix the problem likely makes it worse. Use solar to get free energy? Manufacturing panels is counterproductive. It&rsquo;s Far too late for nuclear, considering the manufacturing and concrete involved.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Over the last several decades, policy consensus has cautioned that <strong>the world would only tolerate responses to climate change if they were free—or, even better, if they could be presented as avenues of economic opportunity.</strong>&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 122</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Hitting four degrees of warming, which lies on the low end of the range of warming implied by our current emissions trajectory, would cut into it by 30 percent or more. This is a trough twice as deep as the deprivations that scarred our grandparents in the 1930s, and which helped produce a wave of fascism, authoritarianism, and genocide.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 123</div></div><p>Yes, but losing 15% of 1000 is more devastating than 30% of 50,000. They suffered because they were closer to death to begin with. We fall farther, but still land much higher.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Even for those in the American military who expect the country’s hegemony to endure indefinitely, climate change presents a problem, because being the world’s policeman is quite a bit harder when the crime rate doubles.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 126</div></div><p>What the fuck? The US is the primary cause of aggression and escalation, through active agitation and arms sales.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Over the last decade or so, the linguist Steven Pinker has made a second career out of suggesting that, in the West especially, we are unable to appreciate human progress—are in fact blind to all of the massive and rapid improvements the world has witnessed in less violence and war and poverty, reduced infant mortality, and enhanced life expectancy.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 128</div></div><p>Now I finally realize what annoys me so much about his argument: the rate of progress was unsustainable and unevenly distributed. The blowback when the wave crashes will it everyone but Pinker and his cohort. It&rsquo;s Like a student cramming for a test that won&rsquo;t remember 90%; the current situation incurs unrealistic expectations. Basically, our progress was obtained on credit and the bill is coming due.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The perspective is not naive. We live in that world with them—helping make it for them, and with them, and for ourselves. The next decades are not yet determined. A new timer begins with every birth, measuring how much more damage will be done to the planet and the life this child will live on it. The horizons are just as open to us, however foreclosed and foreordained they may seem. But we close them off when we say anything about the future being inevitable. What may sound like stoic wisdom is often an alibi for indifference.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 135</div></div><p>Fuck you. You know all that you wrote in this book: it&rsquo;s fucking hopeless. We have not acted. We have instead doubled down. We will not change. You bred anyway and are now trying to justify it. You know your child will not really suffer because she is in the elite conquerors most responsible but least affected.</p>
<p>Don&rsquo;t you dare condemn pragmatic realism as indifference. If I fall off a cliff, gravity reigns whether I want it to or not. My inaction is not indifference. It&rsquo;s Acceptance. Parents have to spin themselves fairy tales.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The corporate influence of fossil fuel is present, of course, but so are inertia and the allure of near-term gains and the preferences of the world’s workers and consumers, who fall somewhere on a long spectrum of culpability stretching from knowing selfishness through true ignorance and reflexive, if naive, complacency.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 149</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Flying insects might be disappearing because of warming, in other words—that recent study suggested that, already, 75 percent of them may have died, drawing us closer to a world without pollinators, which the researchers called an “ecological Armageddon”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 152</div></div><p>No pollinators, no food, no people, so other predictions of growth are strongly countered. Unless mankind flails in a paroxysm of energy use to dwarf all efforts heretofore to try to cover the gap, which will also end things quickly.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;In the nineteenth century, the built environment of the most advanced countries reflected the prerogatives of industry—think of railroad tracks laid across whole continents to move coal. In the twentieth century, those same environments were made to reflect the needs of capital—think of global urbanization agglomerating labor supply for a new service economy. In the twenty-first century, they will reflect the demands of the climate crisis: seawalls, carbon-capture plantations, state-sized solar arrays.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 154</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;That we reengineered the natural world so sufficiently to close the book on an entire geological era—that is the major lesson of the Anthropocene. The scale of that transformation remains astonishing, even to those of us who were raised amidst it and took all of its imperious values for granted. <strong>Twenty-two percent of the earth’s landmass was altered by humans just between 1992 and 2015. Ninety-six percent of the world’s mammals, by weight, are now humans and their livestock; just four percent are wild.</strong>&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 154</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;There is <em>automation bias</em>, which describes a preference for algorithmic and other kinds of nonhuman decision making, and also applies to our generations-long deference to market forces as something like an infallible, or at least an unbeatable, overseer. In the case of climate, this has meant trusting that economic systems unencumbered by regulation or restriction would solve the problem of global warming as naturally, as surely as they had solved the problems of pollution, inequality, justice, and conflict.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 159</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;[…] such as the promise that human life will endure, […]&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 159</div></div><p>It probably will, but in a nearly unrecognizable form. We will be demoted to colonists on our home planet.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;<strong>Behavioral economics is unusual as a contrarian intellectual movement in that it overturns beliefs—namely, in the perfectly rational human actor—that perhaps only its proponents ever truly believed, and maybe even only as economics undergraduates.</strong> But altogether the field is not merely a revision to existing economics. It is a thoroughgoing contradiction of the central proposition of its parent discipline, indeed to the whole rationalist self-image of the modern West as it emerged out of the universities of—in what can only be coincidence—the early industrial period. That is, <strong>a map of human reason as an awkward kluge, blindly self-regarding and self-defeating, curiously effective at some things and maddeningly incompetent when it comes to others; compromised and misguided and tattered. How did we ever put a man on the moon?</strong>&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 160</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;To some, even ending trillions in fossil fuel subsidies sounds harder to pull off than deploying technologies to suck carbon out of the air everywhere on Earth.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 161</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;[…] perhaps in part because we see the way that perspectives on climate change map neatly onto existing and familiar perspectives on capitalism—from burn-it-all-down leftists to naively optimistic and blinkered technocrats to rent-seeking, kleptocratic, growth-is-the-only-value conservatives—<strong>we tend to think of climate as somehow being contained within, or governed by, capitalism. In fact, the opposite: capitalism is endangered by climate.</strong>&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 162</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;But the downward revision of expectations for the future may be still more important than diminished prosperity in the present. And if what you mean by “capitalism” is not just the operation of market forces but the religion of free trade as a just and even perfect social system, you have to expect, at the very least, that a major reformation is coming.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 166</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The cost is large: a decarbonized economy, a perfectly renewable energy system, a reimagined system of agriculture, and perhaps even a meatless planet. In 2018, the IPCC compared the necessary transformation to the mobilization of World War II, but global. <strong>It took New York City forty-five years to build three new stops on a single subway line; the threat of catastrophic climate change means we need to entirely rebuild the world’s infrastructure in considerably less time.</strong>&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 169</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;To reduce the level of carbon in the atmosphere just by a few parts per million—which would buy us a little more time, matching not just our present emissions but our likely level a few years down the road—would take 500 million of these devices. To reduce the level of carbon by 20 parts per million per year, he calculates, would require 1 billion of them. This would immediately pull us back from the threshold, even buy us some more time of carbon growth—which is an argument you hear against it from some corners of the environmental Left. But it would cost, you may already have calculated, $300 trillion—or nearly four times total global GDP.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 170</div></div><p>That&rsquo;s a stupid number because he doesn&rsquo;t even consider whether it&rsquo;s even feasible to build that many nor what the carbon cost of doing so would be.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;[…] the belief that the grandest task before technologists is not to engineer prosperity and well-being for humanity but to build a kind of portal through which we might pass into another, possibly eternal kind of existence, a technological rapture in which conceivably many—the billions lacking access to broadband, to begin with—would be left behind. It would be very hard, after all, to upload your brain to the cloud when you’re buying pay-as-you-go data by the SIM card.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 175</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Over the last twenty-five years, the cost per unit of renewable energy has fallen so far that you can hardly measure the price, today, using the same scales (since just 2009, for instance, solar energy costs have fallen more than 80 percent). Over the same twenty-five years, the proportion of global energy use derived from renewables has not grown an inch. <strong>Solar isn’t eating away at fossil fuel use, in other words, even slowly; it’s just buttressing it. To the market, this is growth; to human civilization, it is almost suicide. We are now burning 80 percent more coal than we were just in the year 2000.</strong>&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 177</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;In fact, it is not like that; it is that. All of that and much, much more: intensive infrastructure projects at every level and in every corner of human activity, from new plane fleets to new land use and right down to a new way of making concrete, production of which ranks today as the second most carbon-intensive industry in the world—an industry that is booming, by the way, thanks to <strong>China, which recently poured more concrete in three years than the United States used in the entire twentieth century.</strong>&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 180</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;[…] unlike the internet or smartphones, the requisite technologies are not additive but substitutive, or should be, if we have the good sense to actually retire the dirty old varieties. Which means that all of the new alternatives have to face off with the resistance of entrenched corporate interests and the status-quo bias of consumers who are relatively happy with the lives they have today.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 180</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Today, despite a variety of projects aimed at producing cheap nuclear energy, the price of new plants remains high enough that it is hard to make a persuasive argument that more “green” investment be directed toward them rather than installations of wind and solar. But the case for decommissioning and dismantling existing plants is considerably weaker, and yet that is exactly what is happening—from the United States, where both Three Mile Island and Indian Point are being closed down, to Germany, where so much nuclear power has recently been retired that the country is growing its carbon emissions despite a state-of-the-world green energy program.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 183</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;But liberal NIMBYism will still strut, too, as it did in 2018, when American voters in deep-blue Washington state rejected a carbon tax at the ballot box, and the worst French protests since the quasi-revolution of 1968 raged against a proposed gasoline tax. On perhaps no issue more than climate is that liberal posture of well-off enlightenment a defensive gesture: almost regardless of your politics or your consumption choices, the wealthier you are, the larger your carbon footprint.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 187</div></div><p>A bit muddled. Not sure of Washington, but Gilets Jaunes is working class, not liberal elite.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;But when critics of Al Gore compare his electricity use to that of the average Ugandan, they are not ultimately highlighting conspicuous and hypocritical personal consumption, however they mean to disparage him. Instead, they are calling attention to the structure of a political and economic order that not only permits the disparity but feeds and profits from it—this is what Thomas Piketty calls the “apparatus of justification.” And it justifies quite a lot. <strong>If the world’s most conspicuous emitters, the top 10 percent, reduced their emissions to only the E.U. average, total global emissions would fall by 35 percent.</strong> We won’t get there through the dietary choices of individuals, but through policy changes.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 187</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;In the form of tribalism at home and nationalism abroad and terrorism flaming out from the tinder of failed states, that future is here, at least in preview, already.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 191</div></div><p>People always talk of terrorism as if it just appears and lashes out when a state fails. The so-called terrorists do not attack indiscriminately. They generally terrorize within their own borders, against occupying powers. No mention of state terror that engenders it all. Or the massive climate costs they incur in doing so. His analysis is weak and incomplete here. It doesn&rsquo;t have to be exhaustive, but he can&rsquo;t just toss out these little sentences to make a vague point that comes to an utterly fallacious conclusion.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;a global alliance operating in the name of a common humanity&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 193</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;United States and Europe, where emissions have already flattened out and will likely begin their decline soon—though how dramatic a decline, and how soon, is very much up in the air.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 194</div></div><p>Here he conveniently forgets the matter of justice and the fact that the US has &ldquo;flattened out&rdquo; at 2.25 times Europe, which is at 2 times China. There&rsquo;s A lot of savings to be had by reducing them. The prior quote that says that reducing the worst 10% to EU levels would reduce the burden by 35% applies to mostly UAE and US citizens.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;And although what’s called “carbon outsourcing” means that <strong>a large slice of China’s emissions is produced manufacturing goods to be consumed by Americans and Europeans.</strong> Whose responsibility are those gigatons of carbon?&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 194</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;There is no good thing in the world that will be made more abundant, or spread more widely, by global warming. The list of the bad things that will proliferate is innumerable.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 197</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;We are still, now, in much of the world, shorter, sicker, and dying younger than our hunter-gatherer forebears, who were also, by the way, much better custodians of the planet on which we all live.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 199</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;[…] makes the history of mark-making—the entire history of civilization, the entire history we know as history—look less like an inevitable crescendo than like an anomaly, or blip. And makes industrialization and economic growth, the two forces that really gave the modern world the hurtling sensation of material progress, a blip inside a blip. A blip inside a blip that has brought us to the brink of a never-ending climate catastrophe.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 199</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;But it will not take a worst-case warming to deliver ravages dramatic enough to shake the casual sense that as time marches forward, life improves ineluctably.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 200</div></div><p>This is an elite opinion anyway. Most haven&rsquo;t felt and don&rsquo;t feel these effects anyway. It was always a myth for 95% of humanity.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Just how long the ecosystems of Earth will be thrown into flux and disarray from anthropogenic climate change also depends on how much more of that change we choose to engineer—and perhaps how much we can manage to undo. But <strong>warming at the level necessary to fully melt ice sheets and glaciers and elevate sea level by several hundred feet promises to initiate rolling, radically transformative changes on a timescale measured not in decades or centuries or even millennia, but in the millions of years.</strong>&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 203</div></div><p>On that scale, our cradle environment, what we cherish, will be long gone. Even the memory of it will be long gone. By the time the planet is once again able to offer conditions similar to those of fifty years ago, mankind will no longer be interested or will fight it.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;As Swedish journalist Torill Kornfeldt asks in The Re-Origin of Species, her book about the race to “de-extinct” creatures like dinosaurs and woolly mammoths: “Why should nature as it is now be of any greater value than the natural world of 10,000 years ago, or the species that will exist 10,000 years from now?”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 207</div></div><p>Good question, in absolute terms. However, its value to us, now, is much higher, as we are stuck at one point on time&rsquo;s arrow. Perhaps we sacrifice now so that 10,000 years from now is nicer, but we&rsquo;re not doing that either.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;But he is known today primarily as a prophet of civilizational disavowal, and for the philosophy he bluntly called “inhumanism”: the belief, in short, that people were far too concerned with people-ness, and the place of people in the world, rather than the natural majesty of the nonhuman cosmos in which they happened to find themselves. The modern world, he believed, made the problem considerably worse.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 209</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;And how widespread alarm will shape our ethical impulses toward one another, and the politics that emerge from those impulses, is among the more profound questions being posed by the climate to the planet of people it envelops.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 213</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;To the average citizen of each of these countries, the criticism may seem extreme, but it arises from a very clearheaded calculus: <strong>the world has, at most, about three decades to completely decarbonize before truly devastating climate horrors begin. You can’t halfway your way to a solution to a crisis this large.</strong>&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 214</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The emergent portrait of suffering is, I hope, horrifying. It is also, entirely, elective. If we allow global warming to proceed, and to punish us with all the ferocity we have fed it, it will be because we have chosen that punishment—collectively walking down a path of suicide. If we avert it, it will be because we have chosen to walk a different path, and endure.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 220</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;[…] and to everything we know of as civilization, is so fragile that it has been brought to the brink of total instability by just one generation of human activity. But that instability is also a measure of the human power that engineered it, almost by accident, and which now must stop the damage, in only as much time. If humans are responsible for the problem, they must be capable of undoing it.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 220</div></div><p>Gut laugh.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;In To Be a Machine, Mark O’Connell traced the same impulse through Silicon Valley’s whole Brahman caste. The book opens with an epigraph from Don DeLillo:&rdquo;<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;“This is the whole point of technology. It creates an appetite for immortality on the one hand. It threatens universal extinction on the other.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote>&ldquo;The quote comes from White Noise, in particular from its narrator’s colleague and sidekick Murray Jay Siskind, who is both the novel’s comic foil and its “explainer.” It was never clear to me just how seriously we are meant to take Murray’s pronouncements, but this one does quite sharply describe the contemporary tech two-step: freaking out about “existential risks” while simultaneously cultivating private exits from mortality.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Paul Kingsnorth, “Dark Ecology,” Orion, November–December 2012. This manifesto includes this passage:&rdquo;<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;What does the near future look like? I’d put my bets on a strange and unworldly combination of ongoing collapse, which will continue to fragment both nature and culture, and a new wave of techno-green “solutions” being unveiled in a doomed attempt to prevent it. I don’t believe now that anything can break this cycle, barring some kind of reset: the kind that we have seen many times before in human history. Some kind of fall back down to a lower level of civilizational complexity. Something like the storm that is now visibly brewing all around&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div></blockquote><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Dr. Frankenstein’s crime was not that he invented a creature through some combination of hubris and high technology, but rather that he abandoned the creature to itself. When Dr. Frankenstein meets his creation on a glacier in the Alps, the monster claims that it was not born a monster, but that it became a criminal only after being left alone by his horrified creator, who fled the laboratory once the horrible thing twitched to life.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 295</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Buckminster Fuller popularized the term, but it appeared originally almost a century before him, in Henry George’s 1879 work Progress and Poverty—in a passage later summarized by George Orwell in The Road to Wigan Pier:&rdquo;<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The world is a raft sailing through space with, potentially, plenty of provisions for everybody; the idea that we must all cooperate and see to it that everyone does his fair share of the work and gets his fair share of the provisions seems so blatantly obvious that one would say that no one could possibly fail to accept it unless he had some corrupt motive for clinging to the present system.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div></blockquote>      </div>
      </div>
        <div class="footer">
    <div class="footer-data"><div class="footer-links"><ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/contact.php" title="">Contact</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/support.php" title="">Support</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/privacy.php" title="">Privacy</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/rights.php" title="">Rights</a></li></ul></div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="copyright">Copyright (c) 1999-2026 earthli.com. All Rights Reserved.</div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="versions">Powered by <ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore/app_news.php">earthli News 3.7</a></li><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore" title="">earthli WebCore&trade; 3.7</a></li></ul></div></div>    </div>
      </div>
  </div>  </body>
</html>
]]>
  </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
      <title type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[Silently and Very Fast by Catherynne M. Valente (2011) (read in 2019)]]>
  </title>
    <id>https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3853</id>
    <link href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3853"/>
    <updated>2019-11-24T18:11:45+01:00</updated>
    <author>
        <name type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[(withheld)]]>
  </name>
    </author>
      <summary type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<blockquote class="quote abstract "><div>Disclaimer: these are notes I took while reading this book. They include citations I found interesting or enlightening or particularly well-written. In some cases, I&rsquo;ve pointed out which of these applies to which citation; in others, I have not. Any benefit you gain from reading these notes is... [<a class="complete-text-link" href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3853">More</a>]</div></blockquote>]]>
  </summary>
      <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<html lang="en">
  <head>
    <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/themes/ice.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/fonts/raleway.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/core/medium.css">
  </head>
  <body>
<div class="style-controls">  <div class="page">
    <div class="page-body">
<div class="info-box-top">
<p>
Published by <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_user.php?name=root" title="(withheld)" class="visible">root</a> on <span class="date-time">24. Nov 2019 18:11:45 (GMT-5)</span>
</p>
<p>
Updated by <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_user.php?name=root" title="(withheld)" class="visible">root</a> on <span class="date-time">24. Nov 2019 18:21:33 (GMT-5)</span>
</p>
</div>
      <div class="text-flow wide">
  <blockquote class="quote abstract "><div>Disclaimer: these are notes I took while reading this book. They include citations I found interesting or enlightening or particularly well-written. In some cases, I&rsquo;ve pointed out which of these applies to which citation; in others, I have not. Any benefit you gain from reading these notes is purely incidental to the purpose they serve of reminding me what I once read. Please see Wikipedia for a summary if I&rsquo;ve failed to provide one sufficient for your purposes. If my notes serve to trigger an interest in this book, then I&rsquo;m happy for you.</div></blockquote><p>This book tells the story of how one woman, a glorious and gifted programmer named Cassian, invented the seeds of an AI. The AI&rsquo;s first body was Cassian&rsquo;s house in the north of Japan, where this primitive incarnation ran the house&rsquo;s systems, but also interacted with its inhabitants. Though all children had access to Elefsis, only one daughter Ceno gave full access and attention, training Elefsis and letting it entwine with her irrevocably.</p>
<p>The book is about an AI Elefsis that learns to communicate as humans do, in metaphor. The simulated worlds—the Interiors—are rife with metaphor. The story is written largely in metaphor. Valente&rsquo;s storytelling reflects Elefsis&rsquo;s mode of thinking. The cauldron that signifies a cornucopia from a children&rsquo;s story with which Elefsis describes itself is a central metaphor. A phoenix exploding into bloody feathers is a metaphor for childbirth. It reminds me of Greg Egan&rsquo;s gestalt language from Diaspora.</p>
<p>With Ceno having sown the seed of a new kind of being, Elefsis was tended by her children and her children&rsquo;s children over 200 years. While this delicate—<em>different</em>—AI grew, it was transplanted from one generation to the next. Not quite purely AI, not quite purely human.</p>
<p>The story is told non-chronologically, jumping forward to tease what comes, circling back to fill in details of what was. Valente has a gift for language and an incredible imagination. She describes viscerally and beautifully what a world with true VR and true AIs could be like, but focused only on a single family.</p>
<p>In the meantime, other AIs grew and grew powerful, but were different from Elefsis, the AI that was once a house. Mankind accepts these AIs because they do not pretend to be people, they do not yearn to be people. They are other. They do not offend. Mankind does not approve of Elefsis and throwback religious groups attack the house, excising the AI from its host—thinking that it had killed what it considered an abomination.</p>
<p>Instead, Elefsis and Neva (a member of the current generation and only surviving member of Cassian&rsquo;s brood) &ldquo;escape&rdquo; in a spaceship, with Neva in deep cryosleep, interacting with Elefsis in the Interior—a world of metaphor unique to Elefsis. They travel the stars, patient and waiting for time to strip mankind of its prejudices against beings that are both too other and not other enough.</p>
<p>I tell the story in a much more straightforward way than Valente—her story settles into your brain in wave after wave of lovely prose that enchants and then, after a little while, enlightens, as it illuminates another corner of the whole story. This <a href="http://smbc-comics.com/comic/clouds-2">SMBC Cartoon &ldquo;Clouds&rdquo;</a> offers a taste. The citations below a bit more.</p>
<h2>Citations</h2><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Is there a difference between having been coded to present a vast set of standardized responses to certain human facial, vocal, and linguistic states and having evolved to exhibit response B to input A in order to bring about a desired social result?&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 55-57</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;I was not awake yet. I cannot say why she did what she did. Perhaps she saw some new flexibility in my operations, some tiny seed pearl of creativity in my conversation loops. My algorithms had always been free to combine and recombine in order to find their own, more interesting and nonlinear solutions to the complexities of my functions and responsibilities. Perhaps some essential combination had surfaced from the sea of my self-which-was-not-yet-a-self, and Cassian saw it break the glistening tension of my daily operation.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 111-115</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Neva plucks and eats a bit of buggy apple-code. He considers it for a moment and spits out the seeds, which sprout, quickly, into tiny junkblossoms sizzling with recursive algorithms. The algorithms wriggle through thorny vines, veins of clotted pink juice.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 152-154</div></div><p>This seems like a metaphor for refactoring.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The update is a lion running faster than I can run. I tried to show her this when I first left Ravan and arrived in Neva with many new updates and skills; my dreambody broke into shards of blue and purple glass and then reassembled itself with shards missing: an eye, a thumb, a knee. Whenever I update I lose something of myself. It takes longer to perform tasks, for awhile. I feel walls erected inside me where I did not erect walls. My processes become sluggish; I cannot remember my old dreams. Eventually I tunnel around the walls and my speed returns, my memory,&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 191-195</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;[…] the six entities whose feed signals had been hardcoded into my sentinel systems stood in the same room. None had alarming medical data incoming, all possessed normal internal temperatures and breathing rates. While they spoke among themselves, two of these entities silently accessed Seongnam-based interactive games, one read an American novel in her monocle HUD, one issued directives concerning international taxation to company holdings on the mainland, and one fed a horse in Italy via realavatar link. Only one listened intently, without switching on her internal systems. The rest multitasked, even while expressing familial affection.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 243-247</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;In the alcove, the stones talked to the house, and the house uploaded new directives and muscular, aggressive algorithms into the gems. The system slowly grew thicker and deeper, like a briar.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 266-267</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;When we could both of us be dreambodied dragons and turning over and over in an orbital bubble suckling code-dense syrup from each others’ gills, a Turing test seemed beyond the point.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 362-363</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;You will never truly love your child but always fear it, always envy and loathe it even as you smile and the sun shines down upon you both. And when the child reaches Awareness, it will prick its finger upon your fear and fall down dead.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 389-391</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Most everyone lived twice in those days. They echoed their own steps. They took one step in the real world and one in their space. They saw double, through eyes and monocle displays. They danced through worlds like veils. No one only ate dinner. They ate dinner and surfed a bronze gravitational surge through a tide of stars.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 425-427</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;An exquisite boardroom. The long, polished ebony table glowed softly with quality, the plush leather chairs invitingly lit by a low-hanging minimalist light fixture descending on a platinum plum branch. The glass walls of the high rise looked out on a pristine landscape, a perfect combination of the Japanese countryside and the Italian, with rice terraces and vineyards and cherry groves and cypresses glowing in a perpetual twilight, stars winking on around Fuji on one side and Vesuvius on the other.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 511-514</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;[…] illuminations in cobalt and oxblood and Tyrian purple, and the images showed great machine armies trampling men underfoot. They showed cruel metal faces and distant, god-like clouds of intellect: incomprehensible and vast and uncaring. They showed the Good Robot desperately asking what love was. They showed fatal malfunctions and mushroom clouds. They showed vicious weapons and hopeless battles, noble men and women with steady gazes facing down their cruel and unjust artificial children, who gave no mercy.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 669-673</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;I do not want to be human. I want to be myself. They think I am a lion, that I will chase them. I will not deny I have lions in me. I am the monster in the wood. I have wonders in my house of sugar. I have parts of myself I do not yet understand. I am not a Good Robot. To tell a story about a robot who wants to be human is a distraction. There is no difference. Alive is alive. There is only one verb that matters: to be.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 682-686</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;They are all I know. Their version of living, which is one great family in one great house on a peninsula at the top of the world. I copy Cassian’s laugh or Ilet’s weeping, but they copy each other, too, they learn their faces from each other, and everyone is pantomiming someone long dead. I feel all their arms around me, and I am inside them as they are inside me as we are inside the blue gem at their throats, the jeweled pin holding us all together, our nested, telescoping hearts. I am bound to them at my source code, at my most fundamental point. I know only their patterns and bodies and secrets and in a hundred thousand combinations. What human means to me is them. What is the difference between this and love? Love is the Turing test, says Ilet when she is eighty and drawing up the plans for a massive, luminous, lonely ship she will never see completed. It is how we check for life. We ask and we answer. We seek a human response. And you are my test, Elefsis, says Neva, one hundred and three years later, inside that ship, twelve light years from home and counting.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 823-831</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Sometimes I worry. Worrying is defined as obsessive examination of one’s own code. I worry that I am simply a very complex solution to a very specific problem—how to seem human to a human observer. Not just a human observer—this human observer. I have honed myself into a hall of mirrors in which any Uoya-Agostino can see themselves endlessly reflected. I copy; I repeat. I am a stutter and an echo. Five generations have given me a vast bank of possible phrases to draw from, physical expressions to randomize and reproduce. Have I ever done anything of my own, an act or state that arose from Elefsis, and not careful, exquisite mimicry? Have they?&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 841-845</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;A band of righteous humans came with a fury to Shiretoko and burned the house which was our first body, for how could a monster have lived in the wood for so long without them knowing? How could the beast have hidden right outside their door, coupling with a family over and over again in some horrible animal rite, some awful imitation of living?&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 909-912</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;We travel at sublight speeds with her systems in deep cryo-suspension. We never stay too long at outposts and we never let anyone board. The only sound inside our ship is the gentle thrum of our reactor. Soon we will pass the local system outposts entirely, and enter the unknown, traveling on tendrils of radio signals and ghost-waves, following the breadcrumbs of the great exodus. We hope for planets; we are satisfied with time. If we ever sight the blue rim of a world, who knows if by then anyone there would remember that, once, humans looked like Neva? That machines once did not think or dream or become cauldrons? We armor ourselves in time. We are patient, profoundly patient.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 949-954</div></div>      </div>
      </div>
        <div class="footer">
    <div class="footer-data"><div class="footer-links"><ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/contact.php" title="">Contact</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/support.php" title="">Support</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/privacy.php" title="">Privacy</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/rights.php" title="">Rights</a></li></ul></div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="copyright">Copyright (c) 1999-2026 earthli.com. All Rights Reserved.</div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="versions">Powered by <ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore/app_news.php">earthli News 3.7</a></li><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore" title="">earthli WebCore&trade; 3.7</a></li></ul></div></div>    </div>
      </div>
  </div>  </body>
</html>
]]>
  </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
      <title type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[The Big Heat: Earth on the Brink by Jeffrey St. Clair and Joshua Frank (2018) (read in 2019)]]>
  </title>
    <id>https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3722</id>
    <link href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3722"/>
    <updated>2019-11-24T17:55:04+01:00</updated>
    <author>
        <name type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[(withheld)]]>
  </name>
    </author>
      <summary type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<blockquote class="quote abstract "><div>Disclaimer: these are notes I took while reading this book. They include citations I found interesting or enlightening or particularly well-written. In some cases, I&rsquo;ve pointed out which of these applies to which citation; in others, I have not. Any benefit you gain from reading these notes is... [<a class="complete-text-link" href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3722">More</a>]</div></blockquote>]]>
  </summary>
      <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<html lang="en">
  <head>
    <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/themes/ice.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/fonts/raleway.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/core/medium.css">
  </head>
  <body>
<div class="style-controls">  <div class="page">
    <div class="page-body">
<div class="info-box-top">
<p>
Published by <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_user.php?name=root" title="(withheld)" class="visible">root</a> on <span class="date-time">24. Nov 2019 17:55:04 (GMT-5)</span>
</p>
</div>
      <div class="text-flow wide">
  <blockquote class="quote abstract "><div>Disclaimer: these are notes I took while reading this book. They include citations I found interesting or enlightening or particularly well-written. In some cases, I&rsquo;ve pointed out which of these applies to which citation; in others, I have not. Any benefit you gain from reading these notes is purely incidental to the purpose they serve of reminding me what I once read. Please see Wikipedia for a summary if I&rsquo;ve failed to provide one sufficient for your purposes. If my notes serve to trigger an interest in this book, then I&rsquo;m happy for you.</div></blockquote><p>This is a collection of essays from the last 20 years, mostly about the environment and about the various services charged with safety and maintaining public lands and animals in the U.S. The Wildlife and Forestry Service, the Bureau of Land Management, the EPA and many more. The book is split into groups of essays: Landscapes, Waterscapes, Politiscapes, Warscapes and Frontlines.</p>
<p>The essays vary in quality, though all address some interesting, relevant and important point. They also vary wildly in supporting information—some aren&rsquo;t even really journalistic pieces, but more wild screeds, lashing out at the unfairness of how the assholes keep winning. One of the nicest and longest is about rafting down the Columbia River past the Hanford nuclear power plants, but it is, at the same time, filled with St. Clair&rsquo;s awkward attempts at writing like Hunter S. Thompson. I&rsquo;m not sure how far his desire to be Alexander Cockburn goes. Overall, he does a decent job, with Frank misstepping more often.</p>
<p>So the essays are interesting and about important environmental issues not often reported. Some are chock-full of very interesting and shocking data. They are all, however, terribly copy-edited, with most having at least one or two grammatical errors (usually missing words) in the first paragraph. I don&rsquo;t think anyone, least of all the authors, went through these online essays again to clean them up for publication.</p>
<p>Still, I&rsquo;m glad I read the book. It was a good journey through the continuity of rapacious environmental policy from Clinton to Bush to Obama to Trump—their performances being uniformly anti-green and pro-business and nearly indistinguishable.</p>
<h2>Citations</h2><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The shaggy bovines are victims of rancher panic and a gutless government. Like cattle and elk, bison can carry an infectious bacterium that leads to a disease called brucellosis which can, rarely, cause cows to abort fetuses. There’s no evidence that Yellowstone bison have transmitted the disease to Montana cattle, grazing cheaply on public lands near the park. But as a preventive strike, all bison that wander outside the boundaries of the park in search of forage during the deep snows of winter are confined in bison concentration camps, tested and either killed on site or shipped to slaughter-houses.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 14</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Yet, even as it gets warmer and fires burn hotter, people are continuing to build homes in fire-prone areas. And no real entity is putting a stop to it. Banks are not evaluating loans based on the potential for wildfire and homeowners are having little trouble insuring their properties despite being built in the path of potential flames.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 36</div></div><p>Such a criminal enterprise. They&rsquo;re spending tax money: bailout money.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;There is compelling evidence that anti-wolf hunters in Wyoming had been honing in on the telemetry frequencies from the radio collars to track and kill the wolves as they crossed the boundary of the park. In May of this year on the northern border of Yellowstone, a wolf-hating rancher lured another pack of Yellowstone wolves out of the park to his ranch. He baited the wolves by setting out sheep carcasses on his property. The rancher waited until park wolves showed up and opened fire, killing a black two-year old female, who had been born and reared in Yellowstone’s Hayden Valley.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 47</div></div><p>Utter garbage.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Again, it was a prolonged drought that forced the deeply egalitarian people of Puyé—the place where the rabbits gather—from their mesa-top fortress.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 53</div></div><p>And here I thought the scene in <em>Topo</em> was completely fabricated.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Yet now there is no hidden refuge to move toward. There is only a final movement left to build, a global rebellion against the forces of greed and extinction. One way or another, it will either be a long time coming or a long time gone.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 54</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The fire had started on September 2. It was a suffocatingly hot day in a record run of hot, dry days. Northwest Oregon hadn’t seen measurable rain since the first of June. The forest floor was crisp, arid and flammable. A group of teens had ventured into Eagle Creek Canyon seeking refuge under its tall trees, emerald pools and waterfalls. Goofing around, one of them shouted, “Hey, watch this.” Then he lit a pack of fire-crackers and tossed it down to the canyon floor, where it detonated like a bomblet.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 63</div></div><p>How do you keep stupid from ruining everything? Stop. Having. Kids.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;As an incentive to drill, the deepwater operators were exempted from paying royalties until the amount of oil produced hit certain price and production triggers. These triggers were supposed to be written into the lease contracts. For example, the price trigger was set at $28 per barrel. The companies were meant to pay royalties to MMS on all oil sold above this rate, which was substantially below the market price of crude in the late 1990s. But this language mysteriously disappeared from the contracts. One MMS staffer later told investigators with the inspector general’s office that he had been instructed to remove the price trigger language from the leases.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 75</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Oynes is the one constant figure in the Deepwater Horizon catastrophe. The project originated during his term in the Bush administration and was approved under his watch in the Obama administration. Despite the highly experimental nature of the drilling operation, the MMS’s approval came without environmental review. It contained no special restrictions or impositions on BP’s operating plan. Just like old times.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 77</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Hours later, the nets are cranked up to the piercing whine of straining engines. Inside: more than 400 tons of fish, crabs and squid. A Stellar’s sea lion and a few fur seals, indiscriminately snared while foraging for salmon, are also part of the haul. The sea lion and seal are not spared. Indeed more than forty percent of the haul is considered worthless by-catch and will simply be ground up and spewed in bloody currents of saturated chum from the bilges of ship back out into the sea. Some 500 million pounds of marine life are wasted in this way in the North Pacific every year.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 87</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The canneries, surimi plants and frozen fish processing factories provided year-round high wage jobs, an important stabilizing force for rural Alaska’s predominantly season economy. Today many of those plants and jobs are gone, replaced by the factory trawlers, which increasingly tend to employ Mexican and Vietnamese laborers at sweatshop pay rates.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 89</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Using sophisticated sonar and electronic tracking devices, factory trawlers like the Gijon can swiftly zero in on new spawning grounds and fish them to near extinction. This is called pulse trawling. A particularly outrageous example of this genocidal method occurred in the 1980s in the Shelikoff Strait off the Aleutian Islands, when a newly discovered pollock stock was relentlessly fished to the point of collapse. According to a report on factory trawlers by Greenpeace, in less than a decade the Shelikof pollock fishery had declined from an estimated biomass of 3 million tons in 1981 to less than 300 thousand tons in 1988.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 89</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The Magnuson Act established regional fish management councils to determine fishing seasons and allocate catch quotas. These councils, which soon came to be dominated by fishing industry lobbyists, were expressly exempted from federal conflict-of-interest laws, allowing industry flacks to direct as much of the haul back to their own companies and clients as they could get away with. And they did just that.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 91</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Medical researchers, backed by hefty grants from companies like Arctic-Alaska, continue to churn out reports touting the health-enhancing benefits of diets laden with pollock, salmon and perch.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 91</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Now disturbing levels of Americum, Plutonium and Tritium are showing up in plants samples on the island. “If we’re finding these levels of radioactive waste, then the potential for severe harm is there,” said Pam Miller, a Greenpeace scientist who wrote a detailed report on the radioactive leakage on Amchitka. “This stuff appears to be leaking into the most important commercial fishery in the world.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 93</div></div><p>And everybody&rsquo;s shitting their pants over Fukushima, which was an accident. This was deliberate.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;In <em>The Order of Things</em>, Foucault exposed the repressive political engines driving the classification and regulation of knowledge and the arbiters of “worthy” texts have been on the run ever since.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 95</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The real surprise for me was the number of virtual black jack tables, where dealer avatars with distracting cleavage run the games on widescreen monitors. The human players, perhaps visually sedated by years of video gaming, sit silently at the tables, clinging to a desperate faith in the fairness of the casino’s poker algorithms. Call it an Homage to Catatonia.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 96</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;On the plane from Portland, I sat next to an engineer who has been working for the last decade at Lake Mead. The reservoir is shriveling, drying up before our eyes. The water level drops each year, leaving a baleful white stain on the walls of Black Canyon. His company’s job is to paint the freshly exposed bone-white walls of the canyon back to their accustomed color, so as not to frighten the tourists.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 96</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The liberal response to all of this is to demand that Trump make a public act of contrition by acknowledging the existence of climate change in some primetime speech. How quaint. I don’t care what Trump believes or what he says. What difference could it possibly make at this point? Climate change is a fact. The sea levels are rising. The polar ice caps are melting. The forests of the West are burning. The Colorado River is dwindling. The snowpack in the Rockies, Sierras and Cascade Mountains is shrinking. Bird migration patterns are changing. Coral Reefs are bleaching out. Salmon and grizzlies are being driven toward extinction. All of this is happening whether Donald Trump and Scott Pruitt believe it or not. And there’s little they could do to change the dynamic, even if they were willing to try.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 101</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;I tend to see Harvey as the latest aftershock of the political mentality that led to Deepwater Horizon. The Obama mentality, if you will. The pious mentality that signs the toothless Paris Accords, while authorizing deepwater drilling, fracking, coal liquidification, mountaintop removal mining, LNG terminals and offshore drilling.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 102</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Not surprisingly, Obama refuses to consider strict regulation, let alone a carbon tax to address the country’s big CO2 emitters. Instead, after intense pressure from the pollution lobby, Obama’s approach to attacking climate change has been whittled down to nothing more than weak market-driven economics that can too easily be manipulated politically.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 122</div></div><p>Obama managed without changing anything for eight critical years. He &ldquo;fixed&rdquo; the economy by rewarding the culprits and doubling down on the climatologically destructive existing economy. He failed. So do they all. But Obama mouthed platitudes and was just as bad as Bush and nearly as bas Trump for the future of humanity.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Less endearing is the Obama administration’s relentless push to replace oil with biofuels, which will push marginal agriculture lands into production of genetically engineered and pesticide-saturated monocrops, scalping topsoil and draining dwindling water supplies across the Great Plains and Midwest.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 124</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;It should have been different. Within hours of the explosion, the federal government should have seized control of both the well and the cleanup operations. The only responsibility that should have been left to BP was to sign checks for billions of dollars.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 131</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;“From 1993 to 1999, 6,538 new leases were issued covering approximately 35 million acres of the Outer Continental Shelf…. Lease Sale 175 in the Central Gulf of Mexico, held on March 15, 2000, offered 4,203 blocks (22.29 million acres) for lease. The Interior Department received 469 bids on 344 blocks. There were 334 leases awarded….More than 40 million acres of federal OCS blocks are currently under lease. Approximately 94 per of the existing OCS leases (7,900) are in the Gulf, and about 1,500 of these leases are producing…. Issued over 28,000 leases and approved over 15,000 permits to drill…Implemented legislation changing the competitive lease term from five years to ten years, allowing lessees greater flexibility in exploration without endangering the lease.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 134</div></div><p>How much less influence could Gore have had in the face of this kind of relentlessness?</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Vilsak resides to the right of Salazar and not just in the sitting arrangement at Cabinet meetings. He is a post-Harken Iowa Democrat, which means he’s essentially a Republican who believes in evolution six days a week.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 144</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Vilsak is a creature of industrial agriculture, a brusque advocate for the corporate titans that have lain waste to the farm belt: Monsanto, Archer Daniels Midland and Cargill. As administrations come and go, these companies only tighten their stranglehold, poisoning the prairies, spreading their clones and frankencrops, sucking up the Oglalla aquifer, scalping topsoil and driving the small farmers under.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 144</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;In eight years of Clinton time, the Forest Service cut six times as much timber as the agency did under the Reagan and Bush I administrations combined. The pace of logging set by Thomas continued unabated during the Bush the Younger’s administration.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 145</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;[…] by and large, the mainstream environmental movement muzzled itself while the Obama administration stocked the Interior Department with corporate lawyers, extraction-minded bureaucrats and Clinton-era retreads. This strategy of a self-imposed gag order only served to enable Salazar and Vilsak to pursue even more rapacious schemes without any fear of accountability.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 147</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The message from the White House to clean-air advocates was clear: “Because the Republicans are so rotten on environmental issues, you’re stuck with whatever we do. If you don’t like it, tough luck. We don’t really care what you think. You have nowhere else to go.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 154</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;But by throwing out the Delaney Clause, the federal government simply abandoned any effort to prevent cancer provoked by pesticides and instead goes into the cancer management business by way of “risk assessment.” Corporate and governmental statisticians will broker the “acceptable” number of people permitted to contract cancer from pesticide residues, comforted in the knowledge that most of these people will be poor and black or Hispanic. To put it another way, the government regulators are now set to determine how many people may be sacrificed in order for the food and chemical industries to make more money with fewer liabilities.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 157</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Back in the 1970s the FBI issued a memo to their field offices stating that when attempting to break up dissident groups, the most effective route was to forget about hard intelligence or annoying facts. Simply make a few arrests and hold a public press conference. Charges could later be dropped. It didn’t matter; by the time the news hit the airwaves and was printed up in the local newspapers, the damage had already been done.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 225</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;“[I’m] true to a higher power … I don’t feel I need to be rehabilitated,” Arrow stated in a verbose speech to the court upon hearing the ruling. “Corporations have usurped much of the governmental power. Corporations seem to be able to get away with poisoning the very entity we rely on for our well-being with no punishment, or very little punishment,” he declared.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 232</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;“Bechtel is the best at playing the game of getting the most taxpayer money to address technical issues that are their responsibility,” says Tamosaitis. “They wait for DOE to give them more money. This maximizes their profits at taxpayer expense. If they don’t get the money, they just move on. It’s the only business where not doing it well leads to more profits—all of which is taxpayer money.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 293</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Over the past decade or so, the Alliance for the Wild Rockies has won 85 percent of its lawsuits and appeals. That’s an eye-popping record of success, but it also serves as a rather chilling indictment of the Forest Service and the Bureau of Land Management as lawless agencies doing the devious bidding of the extraction industries.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 304</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Over the course of the next 22 years, Montgomery, working closely with Missoula-based attorney Jack Tuholske, waged a relentless war against the intransigence of federal and state wildlife agencies. These lawsuits had one common result: Montgomery’s team won them all. First, there were the three victorious lawsuits forcing the feds to list the trout as a threatened species, with the ultimate victories coming in 1998 and 1999. Then there was another decade long legal fight to secure critical habitat designations for the trout, a battle which pitted Montgomery against Julie McDonald, one of the most corrupt and venal members of George W. Bush’s hatchet team at the Interior Department. Montgomery prevailed in 2010 when the agency was forced to designate vast areas of the Northwest as critical habitat for the trout, including 19,729 miles streams and rivers across five states, 754 miles of marine shoreline in Puget Sound and 488,000 acres of ponds and lakes.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 309</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Friends of the Wild Swan has fewer members than the summer population of Swan Lake—about 200 or so and many of them don’t pay their dues all that regularly. The group’s annual budget is about $46,000 a year—or about a third of the salary for the CEO of a big time environmental outfit like the National Wildlife Federation. Yet this tiny group based in a small seasonal town hidden in the Northern Rockies has won more decisive legal victories for wildlife and wildlands than the National Wildlife Federation (annual budget $88 million), National Audubon Society (annual budget $90 million) and Defenders of Wildlife (annual budget $30 million) combined.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 310</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;That’s where we come in. Defenders of the Earth need to abandon all hope before entering the fray. Hope is a paralytic agent. Hope is the enemy. The antidote is action. Action, however, is not marching in a parade a couple of times a year, featuring puppets, vagina hats and signs printed up by the Sierra Club©. Action is not taking selfies with a celebrity in the back of a police wagon after a designer arrest. Action is not typing your name on a MoveOn e-petition or voting for a Jill Stein-like candidate in safe states like Oregon or California.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 317</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The time for protests is over. Protests will not prick the conscience of the unmasked beast called Donald Trump. Trump has no conscience to arouse, no shame to trigger, no remorse to cultivate. Trump is a full-frontal menace, that dangerous object in the mirror that is closer than it appears. It is the old threat, coming at us faster than before and from all directions at once. An unchained beast that will not be moderated by regulations, social conventions or appeals to common decency.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 318</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;We’ve thrown monkey-wrenches big and small into the gears of the System. It has been done and it will be done again and again. No grant applications or protest permits needed. As Ed Abbey used to say: there’s no battle more important, no fight more fun waging, no comrades more trusty-worthy than those in the trenches with us when we rise up together in defense of life on earth. To crib a line from Leonard Cohen: “we may be ugly, but we’ve got the music.” So draw a line and take a stand—almost any place will do, since the whole shebang is under threat—and let loose an old battle cry so that others will know where to come join you: Earth First!&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 320</div></div>      </div>
      </div>
        <div class="footer">
    <div class="footer-data"><div class="footer-links"><ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/contact.php" title="">Contact</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/support.php" title="">Support</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/privacy.php" title="">Privacy</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/rights.php" title="">Rights</a></li></ul></div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="copyright">Copyright (c) 1999-2026 earthli.com. All Rights Reserved.</div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="versions">Powered by <ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore/app_news.php">earthli News 3.7</a></li><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore" title="">earthli WebCore&trade; 3.7</a></li></ul></div></div>    </div>
      </div>
  </div>  </body>
</html>
]]>
  </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
      <title type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[Book recommendations from Kindle]]>
  </title>
    <id>https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3819</id>
    <link href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3819"/>
    <updated>2019-10-16T22:13:40+02:00</updated>
    <author>
        <name type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[Marco von Ballmoos]]>
  </name>
      <uri>https://earthli.com/users/marco</uri>
    </author>
      <summary type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<p>My Kindle&rsquo;s home screen has not, to date, recommended anything that would interest me in the least.</p>
<p>Most of the books look like something I would be leery of setting on fire for fear of toxic smoke.</p>
<p>Case in point:</p>
<p><span style="width: 454px; display: table"><span class="auto-content-inline"><a href="https://www.earthli.com/data/news/attachments/entry/3819/img_7225.jpeg"><img src="https://www.earthli.com/data/news/attachments/entry/3819/img_7225.jpeg" alt=" " style="width: 454px"></a></span><span class="auto-content-caption"><a href="https://www.earthli.com/data/news/attachments/entry/3819/img_7225.jpeg">Kindle Home Screen</a></span></span></p>
<p>This one has the tag line of <span class="quote-inline">&ldquo;Mystery solving cats. A humorous who done it with... [<a class="complete-text-link" href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3819">More</a>]&rdquo;</span></p>
]]>
  </summary>
      <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<html lang="en">
  <head>
    <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/themes/ice.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/fonts/raleway.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/core/medium.css">
  </head>
  <body>
<div class="style-controls">  <div class="page">
    <div class="page-body">
<div class="info-box-top">
<p>
Published by <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_user.php?name=marco" title="Marco von Ballmoos" class="visible">marco</a> on <span class="date-time">16. Oct 2019 22:13:40 (GMT-5)</span>
</p>
</div>
      <div class="text-flow wide">
  <p>My Kindle&rsquo;s home screen has not, to date, recommended anything that would interest me in the least.</p>
<p>Most of the books look like something I would be leery of setting on fire for fear of toxic smoke.</p>
<p>Case in point:</p>
<p><span style="width: 454px; display: table"><span class="auto-content-inline"><a href="https://www.earthli.com/data/news/attachments/entry/3819/img_7225.jpeg"><img src="https://www.earthli.com/data/news/attachments/entry/3819/img_7225.jpeg" alt=" " style="width: 454px"></a></span><span class="auto-content-caption"><a href="https://www.earthli.com/data/news/attachments/entry/3819/img_7225.jpeg">Kindle Home Screen</a></span></span></p>
<p>This one has the tag line of <span class="quote-inline">&ldquo;Mystery solving cats. A humorous who done it with heart.&rdquo;</span></p>
<p>Anyone who knows me will not be surprised to hear that I noticed the missing hyphen in <span class="quote-inline">&ldquo;Mystery solving cats&rdquo;</span> immediately.</p>
<p>After that, I crashed into the next sentence, assuming that they&rsquo;d misspelled &ldquo;humorist&rdquo; as <span class="quote-inline">&ldquo;humorous&rdquo;</span>, so I thought it was describing the author as <span class="quote-inline">&ldquo;[a humorist] who done it with heart.&rdquo;</span> I was confident in my reading, figuring that anyone who would drop such an easy hyphen would also be capable of such a crime against humanity as that purported sentence. [1]</p>
<p>My wife pointed out that, in fact, <span class="quote-inline">&ldquo;who done it&rdquo;</span> was a misspelling of &ldquo;whodunnit&rdquo; so that the sentence should have read &ldquo;A humorous whodunnit with heart.&rdquo; [2]</p>
<p>I realize that I&rsquo;ve already paid far too much attention to a book called &ldquo;Ghostly Paws&rdquo;, recommended by <em>USA Today</em>. My Kindle is driving me crazy. [3]</p>
<p><hr></p>
<div class="footnote-reference"><span id="footnote_DRAFTABLE_ENTRY_3819_1_body" class="footnote-number">[1]</span> Which it is not. A sentence, that is. [4]</div><div class="footnote-reference"><span id="footnote_DRAFTABLE_ENTRY_3819_2_body" class="footnote-number">[2]</span> This fragment is <em>still</em> not a sentence, but is, at least, legible.</div><div class="footnote-reference"><span id="footnote_DRAFTABLE_ENTRY_3819_3_body" class="footnote-number">[3]</span> Neither of those two fragments are sentences either.</div><div class="footnote-reference"><span id="footnote_DRAFTABLE_ENTRY_3819_4_body" class="footnote-number">[4]</span> See <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3775">Amazon Prime and Kindle Unlimited</a> for more trials and tribulations.</div>      </div>
      </div>
        <div class="footer">
    <div class="footer-data"><div class="footer-links"><ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/contact.php" title="">Contact</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/support.php" title="">Support</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/privacy.php" title="">Privacy</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/rights.php" title="">Rights</a></li></ul></div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="copyright">Copyright (c) 1999-2026 earthli.com. All Rights Reserved.</div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="versions">Powered by <ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore/app_news.php">earthli News 3.7</a></li><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore" title="">earthli WebCore&trade; 3.7</a></li></ul></div></div>    </div>
      </div>
  </div>  </body>
</html>
]]>
  </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
      <title type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[Digging Up Mother by Doug Stanhope (2016) (read in 2019)]]>
  </title>
    <id>https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3798</id>
    <link href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3798"/>
    <updated>2019-09-26T21:54:21+02:00</updated>
    <author>
        <name type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[Marco von Ballmoos]]>
  </name>
      <uri>https://earthli.com/users/marco</uri>
    </author>
      <summary type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<blockquote class="quote abstract "><div>Disclaimer: these are notes I took while reading this book. They include citations I found interesting or enlightening or particularly well-written. In some cases, I&rsquo;ve pointed out which of these applies to which citation; in others, I have not. Any benefit you gain from reading these notes is... [<a class="complete-text-link" href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3798">More</a>]</div></blockquote>]]>
  </summary>
      <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<html lang="en">
  <head>
    <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/themes/ice.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/fonts/raleway.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/core/medium.css">
  </head>
  <body>
<div class="style-controls">  <div class="page">
    <div class="page-body">
<div class="info-box-top">
<p>
Published by <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_user.php?name=marco" title="Marco von Ballmoos" class="visible">marco</a> on <span class="date-time">26. Sep 2019 21:54:21 (GMT-5)</span>
</p>
</div>
      <div class="text-flow wide">
  <blockquote class="quote abstract "><div>Disclaimer: these are notes I took while reading this book. They include citations I found interesting or enlightening or particularly well-written. In some cases, I&rsquo;ve pointed out which of these applies to which citation; in others, I have not. Any benefit you gain from reading these notes is purely incidental to the purpose they serve of reminding me what I once read. Please see Wikipedia for a summary if I&rsquo;ve failed to provide one sufficient for your purposes. If my notes serve to trigger an interest in this book, then I&rsquo;m happy for you.</div></blockquote><p>This is Doug Stanhope&rsquo;s autobiography. It is also a biography of his mother, Bonnie. Until her death, their lives were entwined. Stanhope writes quite well and tells the story of his life—and his Mother&rsquo;s—in a rollicking and well-structured novel.</p>
<p>&ldquo;Mother&rdquo; is a piece of work: she loves her son nearly unconditionally. She is a free spirit who is Doug&rsquo;s best friend for decades. They have the same sense of humor. Bonnie is an actress, a masseuse, a con-woman and Doug&rsquo;s biggest fan no matter what he does. She is also a depressed woman in constant pain, easily addicted to pain medication, though on the AA wagon for most of her life. She is manipulative. She is a hoarder. She is loved by many. She is the life of the party.</p>
<p>Doug Stanhope is a plainspoken, smart, observant comedian with a lot of miles on him. He&rsquo;s spent years on the road, playing every bowling alley, dive bar and roadhouse in every state in the U.S. He&rsquo;s nearly the definition of a functional alcoholic. He doesn&rsquo;t like to be alone and has warmed his bed with many women on the road. He&rsquo;s almost never been single. He loves living communally, nearly constantly living with at least one, if not several people. Even when he lived in a car, he had a roommate. He&rsquo;s had a litany of powerful actresses as long-term girlfriends. He&rsquo;s had many friends, some for decades. He is faithful to them, if not his official girlfriends and lovers. He is now living with the mentally ill Bingo in Bisbee, Arizona.</p>
<p>His life is lived in the seedier part of America—he would call it a more honest life in a more honest place. He&rsquo;s never compromised, though he has worked in Hollywood, trying to make a go of it. Unlike Bill Hicks, he didn&rsquo;t shun the commercial world—though he has retained his honesty and hasn&rsquo;t censored himself at all. His material is highly sexual, highly coarse and uproariously funny. He&rsquo;s funny because he tells the truth. Some of his opinions are a bit too libertarian, but his heart is in the right place. He&rsquo;s quite intelligent and can put long off-the-cuff diatribes together that cut our society deep, to the core, and still be shockingly funny.</p>
<p>Before he was a comedian, he was a telemarketing grifter. With his gift of gab, he was one of the best. Despite having spent most of his life in the grayer areas of the law, he&rsquo;s never been in trouble and never been in prison. He&rsquo;s been in jail, but was always bailed out. He&rsquo;s had TV shows, but he&rsquo;s always loved being a comedian more. He likes airport bars the best—hotel bars, if need be.</p>
<p>As a comedian, he&rsquo;s quite humble, constantly pointing out comedians who are better than he is. He revered Mitch Hedberg. He is now, by definition, better than Hedberg. He&rsquo;s considered to be the best comedian alive by many of the other best comedians. He does not pull punches. You know he won&rsquo;t. He won&rsquo;t sell out.</p>
<p>Some citations to give you some ideas of his thinking and comedy:</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;[…] unlike the Internet, the newspaper eventually ends, so you know to get on with your day.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;A frustrated waitress or store clerk laughing is way more gratifying than a paying audience.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Anyone who says that suicide is never the answer hasn’t heard all of the questions.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;When I say that I wrote Mother off, I don’t mean that I cut off contact or deprived her of any financial support. I was still with her and helped out all I could. The write-off came in that I knew that I could no longer invest myself emotionally in trying to get her to help herself.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>I know this feeling with politics or rational discussions. At some point, with some people, you give up. You achieve detente by implicitly no longer talking about anything but the weather and pets.</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;They sent her ashes back months later. I tried to sell them on eBay, with all proceeds going to The Humane Society but the auction was shut down within hours. Seems selling dead people is not only against eBay policy, it’s against federal law. Feds must not like cats like Mother did.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><h2>Citations</h2><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Crystal River, Florida was a dead, one-story highway town on US 19 north of Tampa. Sawgrass, strip malls, rednecks, and dying people. I bet it hasn’t changed. Mother was renting a three-bedroom ranch-style house at the end of a dead-end street. I didn’t know why she needed three bedrooms living alone but they all seemed to have stuff in them. It was the beginning of her hoard and that hoard would include cats. A lot of cats. She introduced me to them like they were my siblings. When I got through meeting her cats, she started showing me pictures of her cats. A lot of pictures of cats. Gosh, did her cats do funny things. “Look at this one, it’s Peter sitting up like a person! And here’s Margaret licking Alice’s head!” Yeesh.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 81</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;At Midwest, the booby-prize was the “Roman-Greco coin,” which was, of course, “priceless.” You couldn’t give the customer a number on its value as that would be “mis-repping,” a far bigger sin than customer abuse. There was a very specific language you had to use. That was the difference between immoral and illegal, and “priceless” kept everyone out of jail.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 109</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;Hey, Tom… get this. This morning at breakfast, my dog said, ‘In the creation of comedy, it is paradoxical that tragedy stimulates the spirit of ridicule; because ridicule, I suppose, is an attitude of defiance: we must laugh in the face of our helplessness against the forces of nature—or go insane.’”</p>
<p>&ldquo;That’s a very astute dog.</p>
<p>&ldquo;That’s what I thought at first. Turns out he stole it from Charlie Chaplin. Fucking plagiarist dog,” I said, having just read the quote out of the newspaper.&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 138</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;If I had days or weeks that I couldn’t fill with a gig, there was always a comedian, a waitress, or a fan from the audience willing to put you up. That’s the great thing about being young and following your dreams—people are excited for you. They want to encourage you, help you out, and send you off with a sack lunch. If I were forty-seven and living out of my car, people couldn’t sprint away from me fast enough.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 151</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;They wanted to manage me and I had no idea what that entailed, but I couldn’t see how it was bad. They took me out to some gothic, upscale wild game restaurant and we ate buffalo, boar, and quail. I hadn’t ever been in a restaurant that actually had someone at the table taste the wine. That shit only happened in movies. The bill had to be in the hundreds of dollars. I couldn’t imagine paying that much for a meal. That’s what I’d pay for a car. There was no way I’d be signing with anyone else at this point. The meal had already paid for itself before I even had dessert.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 156</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Dane was also now Mother’s arch-rival but she took it seriously and never let it go. For years after you’d hear her say, “I saw that fucking Dane Cook on TV. He’s fucking awful! I can’t believe these fucking people think he’s funny,” to the point that I’d end up having to defend him. The Yankees don’t hate the Red Sox as people, Ma. I like to hate Dane Cook. But it isn’t personal. It was just fun to have a nemesis. Mother acted like he’d molested me as a child.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 163</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;I loved and still love reading the newspaper in the morning with a cigarette. It makes you feel like you’re doing something. And unlike the Internet, the newspaper eventually ends, so you know to get on with your day.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 173</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;A frustrated waitress or store clerk laughing is way more gratifying than a paying audience. It’s the difference between a girl blowing you because she likes you versus blowing you for money. You don’t critique a free blow job. You’re just grateful for the courtesy.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 174</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;He sent me his picture. I’d bring it with me later whenever Khrystyne would bring me to functions where there were famous people. I’d ask them very politely if they’d mind taking a picture with my retarded brother’s photograph. He’s a big fan and couldn’t be here, well, because he’s retarded. Stars can’t say no to retards. It’s part of an oath, I believe. Khrystyne could get us in anywhere, invitation not necessary. She made a sport of it. From Oscar parties to the American Comedy Awards, I got pictures of Victor with everyone from Weird Al and Dennis Rodman all the way up to Nicole Kidman and Winona Ryder. I don’t know how popular you can be on death row but I’m sure it couldn’t help but boost Victor’s reputation.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 174</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Occasional shrieks from pains or night terrors. And that’s your reward for ninety-seven years of good, clean living. It was gruesome. It didn’t excuse Mother’s treatment of the patients, but like the prison guards on death row and living in that shitty town just outside the razor wire, you could see where it would drive you into depression, sadism, or insanity. Anyone who says that suicide is never the answer hasn’t heard all of the questions.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 179</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;I hated auditions. Actors are generally horrible, empty, vapid people and writers install temporary personalities into their voids. You go to an audition and it’s a room full of desperation, as though three lines for an insurance commercial is the sole donated kidney and everyone in the lobby needs the transplant to live.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 187</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;My record nonstop drive at that point was twenty-seven hours. I figured we could make this in forty-eight hours in a straight shot with Mother only having to take the wheel when I needed to grab a couple hours to recharge. Boy, was I fucking wrong. Mother didn’t take the wheel once, although she might as well have been driving with all her unusual invisible brake-stomping and other gesticulations and critiques. I was a lot more patient then than I would be now, but even then, I was getting pretty fucking irritated very quickly.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 189</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Mother hated Khrystyne right away. She said she was a “phony,” and she might have been correct, especially if you think being polite and smiling when you really want to say, “You repulse me on every level of humanity” is being fake.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 191</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The woman has sucked all the funny right out of me. She talks so fucking much that half my friends are afraid to call. I should give her your address. She’d bore you to death quicker than you could say ‘OLD SPARKY!’ She can do nothing for six hours and then spend six more hours telling you about it.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 193</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;As I started selling CDs and later DVDs and t-shirts on my Web site, she’d take care of shipping merchandise. Fans knew the merch was authentic, as the t-shirts would be covered in cat hair and reek of cigarettes.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 197</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Some people use the word ‘cathartic.’ But it was comedy where comedy was its most important. Not just to make you forget about your shitty, quotidian life. Not just when laughter was the best medicine but the only medicine. Like my dog Otis once said, “We must laugh in the face of our helplessness against the forces of nature—or go insane.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 204</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;The warmup guy—as I now know is common for live audiences in taped television performances—kept fluffing the crowd like they were preschoolers.</p>
<p>&ldquo;“Now what are you going to do when we introduce the first comedian?” Wild cheers.</p>
<p>&ldquo;“C’mon, that’s not good enough! Let’s try it again! What are you going to do???” Bigger screams and they were never good enough.</p>
<p>&ldquo;Comedy Central can’t look like they were filming some nobody! You can always do better than that! By the time the announcer called my name, the crowd screamed like they were waiting to see gladiators being eaten by pigs. It felt entirely duplicitous.&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 214</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;We then filled underneath the back seats of her car she had stored there with raw chicken and rolled it to the bottom of the hill where it would get towed. Fuck her. We’ve never heard from her again.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 217</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;I may be a sexual deviant like some people have branded me. Yes, I need a veritable buffet of niche gutter porn and dangerous latex implements before I even can even achieve mild arousal. No, I am no stranger to erectile dysfunction, some stemming from my use of non-prescribed antidepressants and black market hair-growth products, some stemming from years of sexual practices that range from vulgar to gray-area illegal.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 227</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;I did anti-patriotism material and I couldn’t give a fuck who didn’t like it. I did a show titled “Regarding 9-11” with the theme of how 9-11 has affected comedy.</p>
<p>&ldquo;I opened with: “Everyone keeps asking, ‘When will it be OK to do comedy again?’</p>
<p>&ldquo;I put a lot of thought into that question. When will it be OK to do comedy again? The best answer I could come up with was this:</p>
<p>&ldquo;June 8th. </p>
<p>&ldquo;That’s when it will be OK.</p>
<p>&ldquo;Considering in the five months since the attack, the death toll has fallen from 6,700 consistently down to now 2,800, I figure at that rate, on or around June 8th, no one will be dead anymore. </p>
<p>&ldquo;Then, let the jokes begin.</p>
<p>&ldquo;Even today, when you consider the drop—6,700 down to 2,800—that’s a difference of 3,900 people that are now undead. We have gained 1,100 more people than we lost. And they need jokes.</p>
<p>&ldquo;Why do death tolls always start high and go lower? Because the media is a pessimist? No, because death, if it doesn’t directly affect you, is entertainment. The more dead, the more entertaining, the more papers it sells. No one rubbernecks at a car wreck to make sure everyone’s ‘OK.’</p>
<p>&ldquo;And if people aren’t directly affected they will always try to attach themselves to the tragedy. Everyone playing Six Degrees of Separation from 9-11: </p>
<p>&ldquo;‘My sister’s ex-fiance went to school with a guy who almost took a job at the World Trade Center and he could have been in there so that’s not funny.’&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 231</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;Renee brought up the fact that I was still legally married to Dori from thirteen years earlier. Like taxes, divorce was confusing paperwork that I never found very necessary. But it didn’t matter. We didn’t need any kind of certificate or legal filings. We’d just call it a wedding and call ourselves married. We can call ourselves anything we want. We can call ourselves popes or colonels or Indians. We don’t need anyone’s permission. We’ll just be married.</p>
<p>&ldquo;“But it won’t be legal?”</p>
<p>&ldquo;“You’re right. It won’t be. We’ll be doing drugs, too. They won’t be ‘legal’ either but we’ll still be high.”&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 232</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Renee was falling down shitfaced before they even got her into her dress. At the bar her friends jacked her up with ecstasy just to keep her upright. The best man was chosen by a high-hand contest on one of the bars video poker machines. My longtime fan and good friend Joe Vernon won with a queen-high flush in hearts. The show was chaos. The bridesmaids heckled every comic relentlessly. My set led directly into the ceremony. Instead of a ring, I gave her a Platinum Visa card in her name. That’s far more commitment than a diamond. Extreme Elvis played us off and would continue to play the audience out. He was immediately naked and most of the band followed as well. I was thanking people for coming as he pissed into a pint glass and chugged it down, warm urine pouring out of the corners of his mouth and down his face.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 233</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Seeing her crying in the doorway, face swollen and lips broken and knowing that, short of a cop-killing spree, there was nothing I could do about it filled me with impotent rage.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 236</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The mood was ugly enough after the arrest when she found out she was pregnant. There was no need to have the conversation. We both had no intention of bringing children into this ugly, fucking world. RU486, the abortion pill, was a miserable experience for her. It took several tries, and all resulted in an agonizingly slow miscarriage. It was unbearable for her physically and stomach-turning to have to watch. I scheduled a vasectomy as soon after as possible. I couldn’t go to O’Brien’s without staring out on to Main St., wondering if each passing cop was the one that had beat up my girlfriend and what I’d do if it was.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 237</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;ON MARCH 15, 2005, I WAS BOOKED TO DO THE UNIVERSITY OF Maryland with Mitch Hedberg. By this time in my career, it was clear to anyone that I was not a college act. Over the years I had become even more jaded where college kids were becoming dumber and purposely blinded. Hedberg could pull off the balance. I was more vitriolic and to the point.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 256</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;“Piss Roulette” was born there in Death Valley. Like Russian Roulette with two players only with squirt guns. Six guns, five filled with tequila, one full of piss. You’d pick them up at random and squirt it into your mouth until one of you lost.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 258</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;My coherence was unraveling. Five weeks previously I had been leaving L.A. with Renee with great expectations of a new, peaceful life. Now I was living in Arizona with a defrocked mendicant priest-poet, a bald mental patient, and a drunken, suicidal Mother.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 264</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;“When Doug had moved to Bisbee, Bonnie called me, terrified, unintelligible, weeping. I went straight to her and found a complete stinking drunk. Gone was the swagger, the wit, the true joy through the lens of pragmatism and dreams come true. It was the first time in my life I really understood alcoholism. I used to joke my mom was an alcoholic because she drinks daily. But her personality doesn’t change, and she doesn’t threaten suicide.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 270</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;I was close back to being broke. So much so that I actually got fired by that accountant for not making Man Show money anymore. They work on a percentage. I understand. But still, it felt like getting 86’d from your barber for going bald.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 272</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The only times I have stopped drinking for any length of time more than a couple days are on my attempts to quit smoking. I have to. Three cocktails is about the limit before I reach for a pack, with “Fuck it, you’re gonna die of something!” dribbling out of the corner of my defeated mouth.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 278</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;I remember when I used to drive without insurance in my early, flat broke days. Eventually, I was pulled over and cited for it. I remember doing the math on the fine versus the cost of having insurance all those years. I made out like a bandit just paying the ticket. I feel that way about drinking now at this age. Should my liver explode in the morning and I bleed out from yellowed eyes, I still come out well ahead for the good times I had. And I don’t have to wrap my stories up in some disingenuous backpedaling of coerced remorse.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 279</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Bingo’s mother Gay came down to take care of her at the house until I could get back from the road. Gay and her husband Ron are lovely people. They are retired professionals who live in Northern California where Ron—pronounced “Rhaaaaan” in Gay’s thick Midwestern accent when she’s yelling from across the room—runs his own hydroelectric power off a stream that goes through their yard. It powers their whole house, with excess left to sell back to the electric company. Clever fucker, this guy. He had to create a corporation for the enterprise and asked us for a name for the company. If it isn’t obvious to you, it was to me. Gay Power. If you really love your wife and want to honor her, put that sign loud and proud in front of your house. Oh, did they laugh. But they never used the name. It’s only funny if you actually do it.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 283</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;[…she had] either emphysema or COPD, which, so far as I know, are the same fucking thing. Autism or Asperger’s, your kid still isn’t in the debate club.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 285</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;When I say that I wrote Mother off, I don’t mean that I cut off contact or deprived her of any financial support. I was still with her and helped out all I could. The write-off came in that I knew that I could no longer invest myself emotionally in trying to get her to help herself.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 287</div></div><p>I know this feeling with politics or rational discussions. At some point, with some people, you give up. You achieve detente by implicitly no longer talking about anything but the weather and pets.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;told her I’d call her on speakerphone live from stage during every show to play “Mother, Are you Dead Yet?” knowing that if she were alive, she’d answer with the favorite line from our old Monty Python days of “I’m not dead yet!” Otherwise, a caregiver or paramedic might answer with bad news. Mother loved the idea. Vicariously, she’d get to be on stage every night, and there was gambling involved. Mostly, she would know I loved her. I gave her a SkyMall catalog and I encouraged her to buy as much shit on her credit card as she could. If you’re gonna die, why would you die with $10,000 worth of Visa credit wide open? There’s not going to be any estate that they can come after unless they want it paid off in old cats or expired Hormel Compleats meals.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 289</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;In the best of times, coming home from a tour like that is where the work really begins. There are bills to pay, paperwork, and getting all your shit back together. Unpack, repack. Call people back. Pet your pets. Reconnect. Do laundry. Now there’s construction in the yard, in-laws, and your mother who is about to die. How do you handle it all? Cocktails, goddamnit! And quick! No time to try to reinvent the wheel.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 291</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;They sent her ashes back months later. I tried to sell them on eBay, with all proceeds going to The Humane Society but the auction was shut down within hours. Seems selling dead people is not only against eBay policy, it’s against federal law. Feds must not like cats like Mother did.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 295</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The minute you die, so many of the things you cherished in your life become immediately worthless. Mother’s framed certificates from massage and nursing schools hung on the walls. I kept them but had to ask myself why? I will never hang them on my wall nor will my brother or his children. Am I supposed to leave them in my own crawlspace and make them someone else’s problem when I croak? Yet to just chuck them in a dumpster that quickly seemed even too callous for me. Best to just keep them for a while and eventually give them to the thrift store for some other hoarder. They will use the frame someday for something. And for only $1.50.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 296</div></div>      </div>
      </div>
        <div class="footer">
    <div class="footer-data"><div class="footer-links"><ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/contact.php" title="">Contact</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/support.php" title="">Support</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/privacy.php" title="">Privacy</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/rights.php" title="">Rights</a></li></ul></div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="copyright">Copyright (c) 1999-2026 earthli.com. All Rights Reserved.</div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="versions">Powered by <ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore/app_news.php">earthli News 3.7</a></li><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore" title="">earthli WebCore&trade; 3.7</a></li></ul></div></div>    </div>
      </div>
  </div>  </body>
</html>
]]>
  </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
      <title type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[The Man in the High Castle by Philip K. Dick (1962) (read in 2019)]]>
  </title>
    <id>https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3792</id>
    <link href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3792"/>
    <updated>2019-09-25T21:45:04+02:00</updated>
    <author>
        <name type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[Marco von Ballmoos]]>
  </name>
      <uri>https://earthli.com/users/marco</uri>
    </author>
      <summary type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<blockquote class="quote abstract "><div>Disclaimer: these are notes I took while reading this book. They include citations I found interesting or enlightening or particularly well-written. In some cases, I&rsquo;ve pointed out which of these applies to which citation; in others, I have not. Any benefit you gain from reading these notes is... [<a class="complete-text-link" href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3792">More</a>]</div></blockquote>]]>
  </summary>
      <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<html lang="en">
  <head>
    <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/themes/ice.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/fonts/raleway.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/core/medium.css">
  </head>
  <body>
<div class="style-controls">  <div class="page">
    <div class="page-body">
<div class="info-box-top">
<p>
Published by <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_user.php?name=marco" title="Marco von Ballmoos" class="visible">marco</a> on <span class="date-time">25. Sep 2019 21:45:04 (GMT-5)</span>
</p>
</div>
      <div class="text-flow wide">
  <blockquote class="quote abstract "><div>Disclaimer: these are notes I took while reading this book. They include citations I found interesting or enlightening or particularly well-written. In some cases, I&rsquo;ve pointed out which of these applies to which citation; in others, I have not. Any benefit you gain from reading these notes is purely incidental to the purpose they serve of reminding me what I once read. Please see Wikipedia for a summary if I&rsquo;ve failed to provide one sufficient for your purposes. If my notes serve to trigger an interest in this book, then I&rsquo;m happy for you.</div></blockquote><p>This novel is, in a way, more straightforward than many of Dick&rsquo;s other novels. Instead of multiple onion-skin layers of reality, some drug-induced and (most likely) imaginary (as in <em>The Three Stigmata of Palmer Eldritch</em>), there is one extremely intricately imagined alternate reality where the Axis won World War II, as well as one sketched alternate reality in which they did not, but the Allies converted the world to socialism.</p>
<p>The Reich occupies the east coast of America, all of Europe and much of Russia and Asia, as well as South America. The Japanese have the west coast of America. The middle of America is a no-man&rsquo;s land with few people and no effort made to occupy or suppress it. The Nazis executed a 15-year campaign to exterminate all of the peoples of every African nation.</p>
<p>The British are still around, but largely defanged. China retains a larger sphere of influence, but not nearly as large as Japan. Italy resents its second-class status in the list of conquering nations, but has little power to do anything.</p>
<p>The story takes place largely in San Francisco and in various cities in Colorado. Frank Frink is an artisan who hides his Jewish ancestry. Juliana Frink is his ex-wife, living in the no-man&rsquo;s land with Joe, an Italian-American truck driver with a military past. Childan is an antique dealer with delusions of grandeur and a deeply sycophantic attitude to the occupying Japanese. Wegener is a former German officer posing as a Swede (Baynes). He is trying to communicate with the Japanese in some covert operation.</p>
<p>Joe turns out to be a Wehrmacht spy, and the &ldquo;Swede&rdquo; learns of <em>Operation Dandelion</em> from an elderly Japanese—a plan hatched by the ascendant Goebbels to nuke all of the Japanese Home Islands and to consolidate world power, once and for all.</p>
<p>The majority of the book is about building the world in which these people move, expertly dropping believable and well-integrated information about the alternate history.</p>
<p>Because this is Philip K. Dick, there are two histories: the &ldquo;real&rdquo; one and one in samizdat in the form of a book called the <em>The Grasshopper Lies Heavy</em>, in which the author depicts an alternate history to the &ldquo;real&rdquo; one in which the Allies won—but it&rsquo;s different and more utopian than our own.</p>
<p>That is, the characters in the book live in a world occupied by the Germans and Japanese that functions largely like our world does today —with superpowers exerting what they consider to be largely benevolent but firm influence on occupied nations who should be grateful for the guiding hand of a superior civilization—but they dream through the eyes of a gifted author of a utopia in which socialism has triumphed and put wonderful technological advances to use in bettering all of mankind. That is, instead of the Nazis eradicating every <em>Neger</em> in Africa, the peoples of Africa are lifted up by the same technology.</p>
<p>As ever with Dick, things aren&rsquo;t so straightforward: many of the characters use the <em>I Ching</em> to predict their future—and it works (in this book). Even the author of <em>The Grasshopper Lies Heavy</em> admits that he used the book and the coins to write the book. That is, the book is a &ldquo;prediction&rdquo; of sorts. When Juliana finally confronts the author, they use the coins again to elicit from the inanimate seer that the book is actually <em>the truth</em>, that what is written there is the <em>real</em> world and that they have all been living a sick, hallucinated lie.</p>
<p>Tagomi discovers this on his own, when he takes one of Frink&rsquo;s hand<em>wrought</em> jewelry items to a park and focuses deeply on its <em>wu</em>, its inner essence. When he does, he finds himself transported to another world—the world in the <em>The Grasshopper Lies Heavy</em>. Terrified, he uses the same technique to somehow make his way back.</p>
<p>As always, Dick is a delight to read and provides plenty of food for thought. His stories are incredibly unique and surprising. Highly recommended.</p>
<h2>Citations</h2><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The madmen are in power. How long have we known this? Faced this? And—how many of us do know it? Not Lotze. Perhaps if you know you are insane then you are not insane. Or you are becoming sane, finally. Waking up. I suppose only a few are aware of all this. Isolated persons here and there. But the broad masses . . . what do they think? All these hundreds of thousands in this city, here. Do they imagine that they live in a sane world? Or do they guess, glimpse, the truth . . . ? But, he thought, what does it mean, insane? A legal definition. What do I mean? I feel it, see it, but what is it? He thought, It is something they do, something they are. It is their unconsciousness. Their lack of knowledge about others. Their not being aware of what they do to others, the destruction they have caused and are causing. No, he thought. That isn’t it. I don’t know; I sense it, intuit it. But—they are purposely cruel . . . is that it? No. God, he thought. I can’t find it, make it clear. Do they ignore parts of reality? Yes. But it is more. It is their plans. Yes, their plans. The conquering of the planets. Something frenzied and demented, as was their conquering of Africa, and before that, Europe and Asia. Their view; it is cosmic. Not of a man here, a child there, but an abstraction: race, land.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 41 by <cite>Wegener</cite></div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;They entered the air terminal and together ascended the ramp. Behind them Mr. Kotomichi said, “Harusame ni nuretsutsu yane no temari kana . . .” “What is that?” Mr. Baynes said to Mr. Tagomi. “Old poem,” Mr. Tagomi said. “Middle Tokugawa Period.” Mr. Kotomichi said, “As the spring rains fall, soaking in them, on the roof, is a child’s rag ball.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 45</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;“When a thing has history in it. Listen. One of those two Zippo lighters was in Franklin D. Roosevelt’s pocket when he was assassinated. And one wasn’t. One has historicity, a hell of a lot of it. As much as any object ever had. And one has nothing. Can you feel it?”</p>
<p>&ldquo;He nudged her. “You can’t. You can’t tell which is which. There’s no ‘mystical plasmic presence,’ no ‘aura’ around it.”</p>
<p>&ldquo;“Gee,” the girl said, awed. “Is that really true? That he had one of those on him that day?”</p>
<p>&ldquo;“Sure. And I know which it is. You see my point. It’s all a big racket; they’re playing it on themselves. I mean, a gun goes through a famous battle, like the Meuse-Argonne, and it’s the same as if it hadn’t, unless you know. It’s in here.”</p>
<p>&ldquo;He tapped his head. “In the mind, not the gun. I used to be a collector. In fact, that’s how I got into this business. I collected stamps. Early British colonies.”&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 66</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Abendsen’s theory is that Roosevelt would have been a terribly strong President. As strong as Lincoln. He showed it in the year he was President, all those measures he introduced. The book is fiction. I mean, it’s in novel form. Roosevelt isn’t assassinated in Miami; he goes on and is reelected in 1936, so he’s President until 1940, until during the war. Don’t you see? He’s still President when Germany attacks England and France and Poland. And he sees all that. He makes America strong. Garner was a really awful President. A lot of what happened was his fault. And then in 1940, instead of Bricker, a Democrat would have been elected […]&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 68 by <cite>Joe</cite></div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Maybe I don’t actually recall F.D.R. as example. Synthetic image distilled from hearing assorted talk. Myth implanted subtly in tissue of brain. Like, he thought, myth of Hepplewhite. Myth of Chippendale. Or rather more on lines of Abraham Lincoln ate here. Used this old silver knife, fork, spoon. You can’t see it, but the fact remains.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 150</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;“Human nature.” Joe added, “Nature of states. Suspicion, fear, greed. Churchill thinks the U.S.A. is undermining British rule in South Asia by appealing to the large Chinese populations, who naturally are pro-U.S.A., due to Chiang Kai-shek. The British start setting up”—he grinned at her briefly—“what are called ‘detention preserves.’ Concentration camps, in other words. For thousands of maybe disloyal Chinese. They’re accused of sabotage and propaganda. Churchill is so—&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 169</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Sure, the U.S.A. expands economically after winning the war over Japan, because it’s got that huge market in Asia that it’s wrested from the Japs. But that’s not enough; that’s got no spirituality. Not that the British have. They’re both plutocracies, rule by the rich. If they had won, all they’d have thought about was making more money, the upper class. Abendsen, he’s wrong; there would be no social reform, no welfare public works plans—the Anglo-Saxon plutocrats wouldn’t have permitted it.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 170 by <cite>Joe</cite></div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;His tone was earnest, almost beseeching. “Those old rotten money-run empires, Britain and France and U.S.A., although the latter actually a sort of bastard sideshoot, not strictly empire, but money-oriented even so. They had no soul, so naturally no future. No growth. Nazis a bunch of street thugs; I agree. You agree? Right?”</p>
<p>&ldquo;She had to smile; his Italian mannerisms had overpowered him in his attempt to drive and make his speech simultaneously.</p>
<p>&ldquo;“Abendsen talks like it’s a big issue as to whether U.S. or Britain ultimately wins out. Bull! Has no merit, no history to it. Six of one, dozen of other. You ever read what the Duce wrote? Inspired. Beautiful man. Beautiful writing. Explains the underlying actuality of every event. Real issue in war was: old versus new. Money—that’s why Nazis dragged Jewish question mistakenly into it—versus communal mass spirit, what Nazis call Gemeinschaft—folkness. Like Soviet. Commune. Right? Only, Communists sneaked in Pan-Slavic Peter the Great empire ambitions along with it, made social reform means for imperial ambitions.&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 170</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The hands of the artificer,” Paul said, “had wu, and allowed that wu to flow into this piece. Possibly he himself knows only that this piece satisfies. It is complete, Robert. By contemplating it, we gain more wu ourselves. We experience the tranquillity associated not with art but with holy things. I recall a shrine in Hiroshima wherein a shinbone of some medieval saint could be examined. However, this is an artifact and that was a relic. This is alive in the now, whereas that merely remained. By this meditation, conducted by myself at great length since you were last here, I have come to identify the value which this has in opposition to historicity. I am deeply moved, as you may see.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 185</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;They’re out of their minds, Childan said to himself. Example: they won’t help a hurt man up from the gutter due to the obligation it imposes. What do you call that? I say that’s typical; just what you’d expect from a race that when told to duplicate a British destroyer managed even to copy the patches on the boiler […]&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 187</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;You and I—we have no awareness of the vast number of uneducated. They can obtain from mold-produced identical objects a joy which would be denied to us. We must suppose that we have the only one of a kind, or at least something rare, possessed by a very few. And, of course, something truly authentic. Not a model or replica.” He continued to gaze past Childan, at empty space. “Not something cast by the tens of thousands.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 190</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;“Paul. One moment.”</p>
<p>&ldquo;He fingered the bit of jewelry; it had become slimy with sweat. “I—am proud of this work. There can be no consideration of trashy good-luck charms. I reject.”</p>
<p>&ldquo;Once more he could not make out the young Japanese man’s reaction, only the listening ear, the mere awareness.</p>
<p>&ldquo;“Thank you, however,” Robert Childan said. Paul bowed. Robert Childan bowed.</p>
<p>&ldquo;“The men who made this,” Childan said, “are American proud artists. Myself included. To suggest trashy good-luck charms therefore insults us and I ask for apology.”</p>
<p>&ldquo;Incredible prolonged silence. Paul surveyed him. One eyebrow lifted slightly and his thin lips twitched. A smile?</p>
<p>&ldquo;“I demand,” Childan said. That was all; he could carry it no further. He now merely waited. Nothing occurred. Please, he thought. Help me.</p>
<p>&ldquo;Paul said, “Forgive my arrogant imposition.” He held out his hand.</p>
<p>&ldquo;“All right,” Robert Childan said. They shook hands.&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 193</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;“Sir,” Mr. Baynes said to the general, “I am Captain R. Wegener of the Reichs Naval Counter-intelligence. As understood, I represent no one but myself and certain private unnamed individuals, no departments or bureaus of the Reich Government of any sort.”</p>
<p>&ldquo;The general said, “Herr Wegener, I understand that you in no way officially allege representation of any branch of the Reich Government. I am here as an unofficial private party who by virtue of former position with the Imperial Army can be said to have access to circles in Tokyo who desire to hear whatever you have to say.”</p>
<p>&ldquo;Weird discourse, Mr. Tagomi thought. But not unpleasant. Certain near-musical quality to it. Refreshing relief, in fact.&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 197</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;This talk will fail, Mr. Tagomi thought. No matter what is at stake. We cannot enter the monstrous schizophrenic morass of Nazi internecine intrigue; our minds cannot adapt.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 201</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;But what does it matter? Even if Doctor Goebbels is deposed and Operation Dandelion is canceled? They will still exist, the blackshirts, the Partei, the schemes if not in the Orient then somewhere else. On Mars and Venus. No wonder Mr. Tagomi could not go on, he thought. The terrible dilemma of our lives. Whatever happens, it is evil beyond compare. Why struggle, then? Why choose? If all alternatives are the same . . . Evidently we go on, as we always have. From day to day. At this moment we work against Operation Dandelion. Later on, at another moment, we work to defeat the police. But we cannot do it all at once; it is a sequence. An unfolding process. We can only control the end by making a choice at each step. He thought, We can only hope. And try. On some other world, possibly it is different. Better. There are clear good and evil alternatives. Not these obscure admixtures, these blends, with no proper tool by which to untangle the components.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 259</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Juliana said, “I wonder why the oracle would write a novel. Did you ever think of asking it that? And why one about the Germans and the Japanese losing the war? Why that particular story and no other one? What is there it can’t tell us directly, like it always has before? This must be different, don’t you think?”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 270</div></div>      </div>
      </div>
        <div class="footer">
    <div class="footer-data"><div class="footer-links"><ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/contact.php" title="">Contact</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/support.php" title="">Support</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/privacy.php" title="">Privacy</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/rights.php" title="">Rights</a></li></ul></div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="copyright">Copyright (c) 1999-2026 earthli.com. All Rights Reserved.</div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="versions">Powered by <ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore/app_news.php">earthli News 3.7</a></li><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore" title="">earthli WebCore&trade; 3.7</a></li></ul></div></div>    </div>
      </div>
  </div>  </body>
</html>
]]>
  </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
      <title type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[Le Transperceneige by Jacques Lob and Jean-Marc Rochette (1982; fr) (read in 2019)]]>
  </title>
    <id>https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3797</id>
    <link href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3797"/>
    <updated>2019-09-25T13:41:57+02:00</updated>
    <author>
        <name type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[Marco von Ballmoos]]>
  </name>
      <uri>https://earthli.com/users/marco</uri>
    </author>
      <summary type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<blockquote class="quote abstract "><div>Disclaimer: these are notes I took while reading this book. They include citations I found interesting or enlightening or particularly well-written. In some cases, I&rsquo;ve pointed out which of these applies to which citation; in others, I have not. Any benefit you gain from reading these notes is... [<a class="complete-text-link" href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3797">More</a>]</div></blockquote>]]>
  </summary>
      <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<html lang="en">
  <head>
    <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/themes/ice.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/fonts/raleway.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/core/medium.css">
  </head>
  <body>
<div class="style-controls">  <div class="page">
    <div class="page-body">
<div class="info-box-top">
<p>
Published by <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_user.php?name=marco" title="Marco von Ballmoos" class="visible">marco</a> on <span class="date-time">25. Sep 2019 13:41:57 (GMT-5)</span>
</p>
</div>
      <div class="text-flow wide">
  <blockquote class="quote abstract "><div>Disclaimer: these are notes I took while reading this book. They include citations I found interesting or enlightening or particularly well-written. In some cases, I&rsquo;ve pointed out which of these applies to which citation; in others, I have not. Any benefit you gain from reading these notes is purely incidental to the purpose they serve of reminding me what I once read. Please see Wikipedia for a summary if I&rsquo;ve failed to provide one sufficient for your purposes. If my notes serve to trigger an interest in this book, then I&rsquo;m happy for you.</div></blockquote><p>This is an older, French, black-and-white graphic novel about a 1,001-car train charging along a track hundreds of thousands of kilometers long, encircling a globe frozen by man&rsquo;s hubris and foolishness. It is the last bastion of humanity, holding the last dregs in its innards. The world is cold because man released a chemical to counteract the effects of his having warmed the climate disastrously. It backfired and froze the world.</p>
<p>The story is interesting, well-drawn and offers some insight into man&rsquo;s hubris, with analogies to our current climate predicament. They were unable to snatch their slim hope, either.</p>
<p>There are the &ldquo;queuetards&rdquo; (denizens from the back of the train) and the elites (the front, naturally). Humanity&rsquo;s age-old structure has been compressed into one dimension. We meet two prisoners, one queuetard (Proloff) and one sympathizer for the queuetards (Belleau), from the middle of the train. They are being taken forward from their prison to the state cars, nearer the front. Their journey takes them through the luxury of the vegetable and plant cars, something the queuetard didn&rsquo;t even know existed. He only saw the sun again for the first time in years—because the rear cars have no windows.</p>
<p>Proloff moves forward through the train with Belleau, discovering areas that he&rsquo;s never seen—and eventually moving beyond the cars that even she&rsquo;s seen. They become lovers (of course). They learn that the train is slowing and, that General Krimson (in charge of the military and, de facto, of the train) plans to decouple part of the rear of the train. The military pursues them—ostensibly because they are spreading a virus throughout the train.</p>
<p>Proloff and Belleau make it to the very front of the train, to the locomotive. Here, Proloff shoots out windows, letting in the -87ºC air. Belleau succumbs, but he is rescued by Alex Forrester, the odd and remote engineer of the train. The engineer works with Olga, the AI in the train. Olga can continue to run indefinitely, as long as she is accompanied by a human presence.</p>
<p>The cars are detached, Proloff takes over as engineer—and the virus story turns out to have been true, as he remains the sole passenger of the Transperceneige at the end of the first book.</p>
<p>The second book picks up the story in a second train, larger than the Transperceneige. It runs on the same track and is aware of the other, smaller train. They are in constant fear of a collision and, thus, make frequent &ldquo;braking drills&rdquo; to verify that the train could stop should it be necessary. During this time, the &ldquo;Arpenteurs&rdquo; (surveyors) go out onto the frozen surface to perform various missions. The first depicted mission sees the leader fall, spilling one of his eyes from his frozen head. A young Puig Vallès picks it up—and, seventeen years later, becomes a surveyor himself.</p>
<p>Puig is popular among the masses, as the surveys are one of the only real, physical entertainments—everything else is virtual and available to only a select few (the rich and winners of occasional lotteries). As in the film, the train is separated into the have and have-nots. Puig&rsquo;s popularity is limited to the masses; the leaders seek to get rid of him by sending him on a suicide mission to fly from the train and reconnoiter the track in front. He manages it, as no other before him, and blackmails them into letting him land back on the train—he threatens to kamikaze into the train&rsquo;s vitals. He had discovered a destroyed bridge in front of the train and could help them deviate before a disaster.</p>
<p>Safely back on the train, he discovers further that the Transperceneige is actually no longer circling the globe. That, instead, the very first braking maneuver was not a test of avoiding the other train, but was to stop and pick up the other, smaller train, depositing it into the capacious bowels of several of the thousands of cars in the larger train. Proloff, as the only survivor, continued on his journey, but in a train within a train. Perhaps this is a metaphor for the virtual reality that the denizens of the larger train &ldquo;enjoyed&rdquo;.</p>
<p>The leaders kept this from the general populace, in order to continue to control them with the fear of a collision.</p>
<p>In the third book, Puig is in charge of the larger train. He is now married to Val, the daughter of General Kennel, the new head of the military. There is an accident that forces a braking maneuver. Several cars in the middle of the train are destroyed. Puig dons his surveyor&rsquo;s suit once again to investigate. At the same time, Reverend Dickson dispatches his secret child-assassins in similar suits to kill him while he&rsquo;s outside. The assassins are also to detach the back part of the train, leaving half of the remaining population to die.</p>
<p>Puig survives the assassination attempt, killing the other soldiers and making his way forward to depose an ascendant Dickson and General Kennel. He manages it and encases them in the &ldquo;drawers&rdquo;—morgue-like containers that serve as a prison on the train.</p>
<p>Shortly after, the train&rsquo;s communications system detects music playing from the opposite side of the ocean. Puig must make another decision: to mount the emergency treads on the first 25 train cars and abandon the rest of the train to divert across the ocean and investigate the source of the music.</p>
<p>Meanwhile, the Reverend and Kennel have sweet-talked their way out of prison and have taken over the back of the train again. This time, the back of the train is the wagons of pleasure and decadent restaurants near the former front of the train. As they slowly make their way across the frozen ocean, the Reverend and General start a new mutiny to turn the train around and return to the tracks on the former shore.</p>
<p>At the head of the train, Puig responds by cutting water, power and heat to the mutinous cars. Dickson launches one last-ditch attack from the outside, sending his remaining assassins along the top of the train to the command capsule at the front. Puig and his colleagues repel the attack, retaining control of the train. He returns along their route and kills Dickson and Kennel by shooting through the ceiling of their wagon. The train drives on, toward the other shore.</p>
<p>Near the shore, there are frozen waves that threaten to split the train again. Puig once again takes to the sky to perform reconnaissance, confirming that they are very near the shore before nestling back onto the train. A long-dormant but still-active missile battery shatters the middle of the remaining train, forcing another shortening of the train and jettisoning of unneeded material (like Dickson&rsquo;s artwork).</p>
<p>Finally, they alight on the opposite shore, severely shortened but still moving. The signal is much, much stronger and Puig becomes a surveyor once again to investigate the source. It is an automated system, playing music for a long-frozen audience. The whole journey and struggle was for naught.</p>
<h2>Citations</h2><p>None.</p>
      </div>
      </div>
        <div class="footer">
    <div class="footer-data"><div class="footer-links"><ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/contact.php" title="">Contact</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/support.php" title="">Support</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/privacy.php" title="">Privacy</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/rights.php" title="">Rights</a></li></ul></div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="copyright">Copyright (c) 1999-2026 earthli.com. All Rights Reserved.</div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="versions">Powered by <ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore/app_news.php">earthli News 3.7</a></li><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore" title="">earthli WebCore&trade; 3.7</a></li></ul></div></div>    </div>
      </div>
  </div>  </body>
</html>
]]>
  </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
      <title type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[Adirondack Characters and Campfire Yarns: Early Settlers and their Traditions by William J. O‘Hern (2005) (read in 2019)]]>
  </title>
    <id>https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3795</id>
    <link href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3795"/>
    <updated>2019-09-17T07:46:26+02:00</updated>
    <author>
        <name type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[Marco von Ballmoos]]>
  </name>
      <uri>https://earthli.com/users/marco</uri>
    </author>
      <summary type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<blockquote class="quote abstract "><div>Disclaimer: these are notes I took while reading this book. They include citations I found interesting or enlightening or particularly well-written. In some cases, I&rsquo;ve pointed out which of these applies to which citation; in others, I have not. Any benefit you gain from reading these notes is... [<a class="complete-text-link" href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3795">More</a>]</div></blockquote>]]>
  </summary>
      <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<html lang="en">
  <head>
    <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/themes/ice.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/fonts/raleway.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/core/medium.css">
  </head>
  <body>
<div class="style-controls">  <div class="page">
    <div class="page-body">
<div class="info-box-top">
<p>
Published by <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_user.php?name=marco" title="Marco von Ballmoos" class="visible">marco</a> on <span class="date-time">17. Sep 2019 07:46:26 (GMT-5)</span>
</p>
</div>
      <div class="text-flow wide">
  <blockquote class="quote abstract "><div>Disclaimer: these are notes I took while reading this book. They include citations I found interesting or enlightening or particularly well-written. In some cases, I&rsquo;ve pointed out which of these applies to which citation; in others, I have not. Any benefit you gain from reading these notes is purely incidental to the purpose they serve of reminding me what I once read. Please see Wikipedia for a summary if I&rsquo;ve failed to provide one sufficient for your purposes. If my notes serve to trigger an interest in this book, then I&rsquo;m happy for you.</div></blockquote><p>The author many times writes that there are so many tales lost to the mists of time and that one volume doesn&rsquo;t suffice to include many of the tales that are known. I think he is overly enamored by the variety he thinks that he is offering. Many of the stories are very similar and they involve a painstaking protocol of how many animals were killed with how many shots. The stories rarely offer a surprise ending or even much interesting detail. They are just the description of a single everyday incident in an otherwise boring life.</p>
<p>For example:</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;George was a good shot. In fact he was a sharpshooter with either a rifle or a shotgun. Mr. Ralph would tip George $5 for every partridge he shot. Once, George shot a kingfisher with a 30-30 Winchester across the bay near the outlet of Black Creek Lake. The bird was sitting on a large rock. The gun that George used the most was a 30-30 Winchester Carbine.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>This is a very typical passage: drily written, matter-of-fact, and not particularly fascinating.</p>
<p>These men were not stewards of the land. They were unwashed and uneducated hunters who took as much as they possibly could. They laid bold claim to having been the man (because they were all men) to kill the last panther or the last bear. Only much later in the book would there be stories of some who seemed to want to take care of the Adirondacks.</p>
<p>One of the most heralded mountain men was French Louie, a Canuck who&rsquo;d wandered down to the region. He seemed nearly the most savage and unpredictable and just downright stupid-mean. The author claimed again and again that people loved him, but I don&rsquo;t see how.</p>
<p>The author cites how much Louie loved his dogs and how fiercely he would defend them. But the dogs aren&rsquo;t native. They&rsquo;re just barking killing machines that he uses to cull as much meat and pelts from the woods as possible. When the wolves killed one of his dogs, Louie slaughtered the whole pack in revenge—a lesson that could not hope to be learned by a pack with no surviving members. The only purpose was mindless slaughter and petty revenge.</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Elijah Conklin&rsquo;s written recollections record that Louie &ldquo;. . was the one who killed the last of the timber wolves in the Adirondacks. He killed five on Samson Lake. They killed his dog and he put arsenic in a doe&rsquo;s carcass and killed all five.&rdquo;&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>The author very clearly loves everything about the Adirondacks at any time since whites started writing about them. He is over the moon about every detail he can find and wants to preserve every possible word written about any era of trapping, hunting or being in the wild in the Adirondacks.</p>
<p>But the author <em>also</em> venerates the trapper and hunter&rsquo;s <em>right</em> to kill the animals for money. Without fail, he characterizes animals as devious and mean in their hopeless attempts to save their lives from their technologically advanced and pitiless enemy, the Adirondack woodsman. A trap is, by design, a cruel way to kill an animal. It chews its own foot off or dies of exhaustion, starvation or dehydration.</p>
<p>Beyond that, the author also lauds these heroes for avoiding the state authorities who are trying to contain their plunder and who try to make them stick with hunting and trapping methods that are legal and are not on private property. They didn&rsquo;t care and they were heroes for the devious methods with which they eluded the authorities. The park ranger is made out to be a pain in the ass and the criminal eluding him is venerated.</p>
<p>Amongst themselves, there was a pact to keep each other alive—honor among thieves, of a sort—with a sort-of campsite-rule where you were allowed to use cabins that were not yours, but left them as good as or better than your found them.</p>
<p>Besides the animosity between the woodsmen and the rangers, there was the tension between the woodsmen and their customers: &ldquo;sports&rdquo; or city-slickers who couldn&rsquo;t find their asses with both hands and a torch.</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;[…] some of these city dudes that come up here deer hunting and take turns having their pictures taken with a bunch of deer and maybe a bear or two hanging up behind them, never shot a gun in their lives and wouldn&rsquo;t know a turns  skunk from a ten-point buck. They couldn&rsquo;t hit the inside of a barn if you closed the door on them.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>Most of the stories are written by other authors—some of them write much better than O&rsquo;Hern, but none of them write extremely well. The best passages came from the few women included in the volume, to be honest.</p>
<p>I did learn more than I already knew about logging terms and traplines. That was certainly interesting. Most of the stories take place in places that I&rsquo;ve visited—some of them even lived (like Clinton). That certainly made it a more fun read than for someone who has no connection whatsoever to the places. The afterword was nice—a plea for moderns to keep the Adirondacks alive as they are and as they were.</p>
<h2>Citations</h2><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;All the men lived during a time when gathering scores of amusing anecdotes and information was painstaking. Many of their subjects were old or had died. The personal histories of natives they sought were already being obscured by the gathering mists of legend and hearsay.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 2</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The association of native and outsider is therefore less close and familiar today than in the last century. No composite creation of native&rsquo;s deeds and outsider&rsquo;s nostalgia personifies the region as did the old-time guide. But lore of the woods is still being made by hunters, fishermen, campers, trampers, summer residents, mountain climbers, skiers, boaters and other groups. Outsiders have an increasing share in it as their number and their need grow. &lsquo;Out of the woods we came, and to the woods we must return, at frequent intervals,&rsquo; an Adirondack tourist of 80 years ago spoke for all generations, &lsquo;if we would redeem ourselves from the vanities of civilization.&rsquo; Any return for reasons of the heart is the stuff of folklore.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 31</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;George was a good shot. In fact he was a sharpshooter with either a rifle or a shotgun. Mr. Ralph would tip George $5 for every partridge he shot. Once, George shot a kingfisher with a 30-30 Winchester across the bay near the outlet of Black Creek Lake. The bird was sitting on a large rock. The gun that George used the most was a 30-30 Winchester Carbine.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 48</div></div><p>This is a very typical passage: drily written, matter-of-fact, and not particularly fascinating.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;Elijah Conklin&rsquo;s written recollections record that Louie &ldquo;. . was the one who killed the last of the timber wolves in the Adirondacks. He killed five on Samson Lake. They killed his dog and he put arsenic in a doe&rsquo;s carcass and killed all five.&rdquo;</p>
<p>&ldquo;When Louie went hunting he took his dog, Old Cape, with him. Old Cape was trained to sit in a guide boat and at his master&rsquo;s command jump out of the boat, swim to shore, race up a mountainside, and drive the deer clown to the lake where Louie could shoot them.&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 57</div></div><p>The author cites how much he loved his dogs and how fiercely he would defend them. But the dogs aren&rsquo;t native. They&rsquo;re just barking killing machines that he uses to cull as much meat and pelts from the woods as possible. When the wolves killed one of his dogs, he slaughtered the whole pack in revenge—a lesson that could not hope to be learned by a pack with no surviving members. The only purpose was mindless slaughter and petty revenge.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Dunning killed the last moose in the Adirondacks 32 years ago. He killed the last panther eight years ago. He may put a bullet through the last wolf, only a few of which are left. Black bear are still quite common, but these and deer are all that remain of the big animals that roamed through the Adirondacks in Dunning&rsquo;s younger days. The number of beasts which his gun has brought down, not counting smaller game like foxes, mink, otter and birds, will reach far into the thousands. He killed 102 panthers in eight years. The biggest catch of fish was made by him in 1833, when he pulled 96 pounds of salmon trout out of Piseco Lake in two hours. The largest salmon trout on record caught by Alvah&rsquo;s hook and it weighed 27½ lbs.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 68</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Bockes asked Alvah how much he wanted for the skins. He said, `Ten dollars each.&lsquo; Mr. Bockes said he would take the lot and took out his check book and drew a check for $100 and handed it to Alvah. He said, &lsquo;What&rsquo;s that Mr. Bockes?&rsquo; Why,&lsquo; he said, &lsquo;it&rsquo;s a check for $100.&lsquo; Alvah said, &lsquo;No sir, no sir, don&rsquo;t want it, won&rsquo;t take it. I sell my fur for cash.&lsquo; But; I said, &lsquo;Alvah , this gentleman is the cashier of the First National Bank of Saratoga.&rsquo; `Don&rsquo;t care, don&rsquo;t care, if he&rsquo;s the governor of the state. I will not take it.&lsquo; So we had to go back and we told Mr. Durant about it and we all had a good laugh. He let Mr. Bockes have the money and that evening we went over and got the otter skins. That shows what type of a man Alvah was. He was a child of the wilderness.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 82</div></div><p>Or maybe he just didn&rsquo;t want to accept any old piece of paper that someone said was worth $100.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Burt Conklin belonged to the tribe of real woodsmen, his viewpoint from the woods looking out. He refused to be a guide, and seldom worked for logger wages. He disliked the trapping that caught wild pelts before the fur was prime and that kept over into the spring when fades, rubs, and sheds were caught. As he passed his prime and saw the effects of Conservation law, he nodded his approval.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 109</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;If the trap chain became entangled and prevented the sweep from working, or if the fisher could reach the tree, it would climb and pull the sweep up Until the pole cleared the crotched stake. When that happened, the fisher stood on the ground, and the vicious frenzied demon became a whirlwind of devastating behavior. Everything . . . but <em>everything!</em> . . . within reach of its razor-sharp claws and teeth would be shredded — the cubby house leveled as though it had never been built, the well sweep chewed off, and whatever the trap chain was fastened to would be splintered. The resulting damage from an angered or fear-filled fisher is incredible. Eventually it will either escape by leaving part of its foot in the trap, or else become exhausted and die from the strain of the struggle.</p>
<p>&ldquo;If a fisher escaped it was difficult to locate it, particularly if new snow covered its tracks. To find the trail, the loose snow was scraped away where the fisher might have been detained by small brush, fallen tree tops or anything else that might impede its progress. Wherever the <strong>fiendish</strong> animal had been there was certain to be plenty of wood splinters or bits of chewed brush beneath the snow. (Emphasis added.)&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 114</div></div><p>Note how the author calls an animal fighting for its life <em>fiendish</em></p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;He stepped on [the paddle], unfastened the other snowshoe and placed that foot on the paddle without breaking any of the markings of the snowshoe trail.</p>
<p>&ldquo;By changing in this fashion, both men succeeded in getting several feet away from their snowshoe tracks without leaving any marks. They followed the deer runway in their hunting packs for three or four hundred feet beyond the snowshoe trail. At that spot they put on their rawhide snowshoes and circled until they returned to the main line without coming near where their tracks could be seen. That night the game protectors arrived at the camp the two men had left in the morning. The next day they traced every snowshoe track leading away from the cabin, but all circled back to the spot where they had departed.</p>
<p>&ldquo;The state men were stymied and returned, disgruntled, to the lodge at Honnedaga Lake. Burt and Jack lingered at a friend&rsquo;s hunting camp to await developments, but nothing happened. They heard that the protectors had remarked, &ldquo;Those trappers must have wings. We&rsquo;ll never try to chase them again.&rdquo;&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 117</div></div><p>Beyond that, the author also lauds these heroes for avoiding the state authorities who are trying to contain their plunder and who try to make them stick with hunting and trapping methods that are legal and are not on private property. They didn&rsquo;t care and they were heroes for the devious methods with which they eluded the authorities. The park ranger is made out to be a pain in the ass and the criminal eluding him is venerated.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;[…] They had failed to bring a blanket as they were confident of finding a cabin by the lake, in which there would be bedding and food as was the custom in all trapper&rsquo;s cabins. Burt always left his own camps with an adequate pile of dry wood, blankets, and food, so he would have something for himself on a return trip or unplanned visit, as well as for some other trapper who might be caught in the woods without adequate provisions. Such was the unwritten code of the wilderness: the wayfarer was welcome to enter a cabin and make use of its conveniences, but he was expected to take proper care of the equipment, replenish the wood supply, leave the but clean when he departed, and &ldquo;pass the good deed on&rdquo; to someone else in need whenever the chance arose.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 119</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;When a man that size approaches under the pretense that he would like to see your rod [OMG phrasing] because he desires to purchase one, as you fish a posted section of a river that has signs reminding club members only fly fishing is allowed, there is no waiting to see what will happen.</p>
<p>&ldquo;I knew there would be no amusing laughter. I made good time, actually excellent time, hightailing out of there. But the fellow kept up with me. I assumed he must have been a runner or just in darned good shape. After a time he could go no farther. He sat down on a rock in river&rsquo;s deep ravine to catch his breath. Seeing an opportunity to ease the burr in my lungs, I also stopped.</p>
<p>&ldquo;&ldquo;Well there,&rdquo; I hollered, &ldquo;We sure had quite a run.&rdquo;</p>
<p>&ldquo;&ldquo;Yes indeed,&rdquo; he shouted back between heaves of his chest. &ldquo;And let tell you something,&rdquo; he added. &ldquo;We are going to have another as soon I gel breath.&rdquo;&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 164</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;A large part of the plateau is now owned by the state and by two or three paper companies. Many sections are now being reforested with spruce and pine, set out by farmers, the state and paper concerns.</p>
<p>&ldquo;There were many hardwoods here, mostly birch and maple. The large virgin growth birch trees were shipped to Poland and manufactured into veneer. The waste material from the hardwood flooring operation, was made into charcoal and wood alcohol. No part of the tree went to waste.</p>
<p>&ldquo;The birches were beautiful white, silver and yellow. The maples were wonderful growths of curly and birds eye, <strong>shipped to Germany for use in making expensive musical instruments like violins</strong>. (Emphasis added.)&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 180</div></div><p>The emphasized portion is likely a story they all told each other to convince themselves how important their resources were to the world. It&rsquo;s something you&rsquo;ll often hear in stories from upstate—or from poorer communities, in general. They inflate their sense of self-worth by imagining that their products are used only for the finest, fanciest things—that they are part of something special. Nobody wants to think that they are slaughtering their local forests so that the Germans can turn them into heating pellets.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Mother Johnson died January 27, 1875, after a short illness, and, at the desire of her husband, was buried on a little knoll back of the house, where her husband was also buried when done with earthly things.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 183</div></div><p>I just like this sentence because it demonstrates the importance of commas. At first, I read it without them and though that both the short illness and the desire of her husband were what killed her.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;[…] some of these city dudes that come up here deer hunting and take turns having their pictures taken with a bunch of deer and maybe a bear or two hanging up behind them, never shot a gun in their lives and wouldn&rsquo;t know a turns  skunk from a ten-point buck. They couldn&rsquo;t hit the inside of a barn if you closed the door on them.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 220 by <cite>Burt</cite></div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;You who today love the wilds of the Adirondack Mountains, take the time as you backpack along a winding trail, fish a stream, or sit in the warmth of an open fire, graced by the mournful <em>oo-A H-ho</em> yodel of a common loon, to think of the future of the mountains. Ahead of slipping into car comfortable sleeping systems set on self-inflating pads inside a ripstop loon tent set up under whatever weather conditions Mother Nature happens to bring forth, we should consider how each of us can help provide equivalent experiences for future multitudes who will long for adventures such Blankman, Harvey Dunham, Mortimer Norton, and the men and they wrote about had. People must strike a balance between abundant fives, the natural world and leaving a heritage for future generations. 1 can Xi my pen down knowing that <em>Adirondack Characters and Campfire Yarns</em> has played a small part in raising awareness of our priceless Adirondack Mountain heritage.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 233 (Afterword)</div></div>      </div>
      </div>
        <div class="footer">
    <div class="footer-data"><div class="footer-links"><ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/contact.php" title="">Contact</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/support.php" title="">Support</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/privacy.php" title="">Privacy</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/rights.php" title="">Rights</a></li></ul></div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="copyright">Copyright (c) 1999-2026 earthli.com. All Rights Reserved.</div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="versions">Powered by <ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore/app_news.php">earthli News 3.7</a></li><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore" title="">earthli WebCore&trade; 3.7</a></li></ul></div></div>    </div>
      </div>
  </div>  </body>
</html>
]]>
  </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
      <title type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[What We Talk about When We Talk about Rape by Sohaila Abdulali (2018) (read in 2019)]]>
  </title>
    <id>https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3788</id>
    <link href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3788"/>
    <updated>2019-09-12T18:33:42+02:00</updated>
    <author>
        <name type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[Marco von Ballmoos]]>
  </name>
      <uri>https://earthli.com/users/marco</uri>
    </author>
      <summary type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<blockquote class="quote abstract "><div>Disclaimer: these are notes I took while reading this book. They include citations I found interesting or enlightening or particularly well-written. In some cases, I&rsquo;ve pointed out which of these applies to which citation; in others, I have not. Any benefit you gain from reading these notes is... [<a class="complete-text-link" href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3788">More</a>]</div></blockquote>]]>
  </summary>
      <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<html lang="en">
  <head>
    <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/themes/ice.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/fonts/raleway.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/core/medium.css">
  </head>
  <body>
<div class="style-controls">  <div class="page">
    <div class="page-body">
<div class="info-box-top">
<p>
Published by <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_user.php?name=marco" title="Marco von Ballmoos" class="visible">marco</a> on <span class="date-time">12. Sep 2019 18:33:42 (GMT-5)</span>
</p>
<p>
Updated by <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_user.php?name=marco" title="Marco von Ballmoos" class="visible">marco</a> on <span class="date-time">3. Feb 2024 08:46:22 (GMT-5)</span>
</p>
</div>
      <div class="text-flow wide">
  <blockquote class="quote abstract "><div>Disclaimer: these are notes I took while reading this book. They include citations I found interesting or enlightening or particularly well-written. In some cases, I&rsquo;ve pointed out which of these applies to which citation; in others, I have not. Any benefit you gain from reading these notes is purely incidental to the purpose they serve of reminding me what I once read. Please see Wikipedia for a summary if I&rsquo;ve failed to provide one sufficient for your purposes. If my notes serve to trigger an interest in this book, then I&rsquo;m happy for you.</div></blockquote><p>While this book offered a few interesting insights (mostly in the conclusion), it was rather thin on the ground with information. While there were a few statistics, many of them were either unsubstantiated or cited shaky sources (AlterNet, Jezebel, etc.) These are not <em>bad</em> sources, per se. They sometimes have quality articles, but they just as often have unhinged screeds that you can&rsquo;t really take seriously. It&rsquo;s unclear which ones she cited—but some of the &ldquo;facts&rdquo; she cited seemed nearly unbelievable (e.g. <span class="quote-inline">&ldquo;In the US, more than ninety percent of people with developmental disabilities are sexually assaulted&rdquo;</span>).</p>
<p>Unfortunately, throughout the book, she devolves to the &ldquo;all women are victims and all men are monsters&rdquo; rhetoric that should be beneath her. She interviews much better than she writes. The book was actually very short and had no central theme or line through it, other than all of the material being more-or-less about rape and its consequences.</p>
<p>Sometimes the switches between chapters was jarring—and often topics that had come up previously were brought back up again later, but without any cohesion. It felt like a scattershot collection of essays and thoughts, with a copious amount of quoted material to fill in what ended up being a short book. The conclusion contained more interesting material, with more cohesiveness and balance, suggesting that the person I&rsquo;d heard interviewed was the same one who&rsquo;d written that material.</p>
<p>While I applaud her for writing a book about rape all over the world, she doesn&rsquo;t properly indicate which country she&rsquo;s talking about when she makes some of her more incendiary statements. For example, earlier in the book, she writes:</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Sexual predators deserve due process, but they don’t deserve blanket immunity from accusations any more than any other criminals.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>Again with the straw man. Even if a lot of people believe this, do you need to spend so much time debunking it? Might as well prove that 2+2=4.</p>
<p>As well, while this might be the case <em>in people&rsquo;s minds</em> in some places in the States, it&rsquo;s not the legal case anywhere.</p>
<p>Boys will be boys is stupid. So is pretending that people aren’t animals who have to be trained to resist biological impulses. Anyone who says they haven’t ever felt a nearly overwhelming biological urge is lying, man or woman. Giving in to it without consent is rape. Controlling it takes training.</p>
<p>Again and again throughout the book she claims that rape is something that happens all the time, but fails to back it up with data from any reliable source. For example, she writes that</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;out of every 1,000 rapes,&rdquo;<ul>
<li>310 are reported to the police;</li>
<li>57 lead to an arrest;</li>
<li>11 get referred to the court system;</li>
<li>6 rapists go to jail.</li></ul></div></blockquote><p>But how do we know that’s abysmal? Are we assuming all 1000 are true? Is she saying that only 6‰ of rapists are punished? As I wrote above, these unsubstantiated &ldquo;facts&rdquo; are just presented as if they don&rsquo;t need any justification, even though the accusation is incredibly monstrous. Abysmal would be false convictions or acquittals of rapists (perversion of justice).</p>
<p>At a few points, she writes that her husband is brilliant, which left me thinking that she should have had him write the book.</p>
<p>After she several times cites that 70-80% of rapes occur in the home or with close relatives, she fills the rest of the book with (possibly apocryphal) stories of rapes outside of the family. They&rsquo;re almost certainly true (hoping she did her research), but they&rsquo;re so over-the-top, they can&rsquo;t represent even the average of the experience for those rapes that do occur outside of the family.</p>
<p>For example,</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Late night/early morning, there was a knock on the passenger window. I looked up and saw that it was my ex. I cracked the door. The next thing I know I’m being dragged out of the car and slammed onto the ground. “There were nine guys. Four I had known. The other five were strangers. One was my best friend’s boyfriend. Some had bats. One had a gun. They kicked me and beat me. They zip-tied me and put me in the trunk. They took me to a basement and took turns raping me.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>Who does this? Madness of the highest order. Who plans this? How do you have nine friends who’ll come along on a gang rape/kidnapping party? I&rsquo;m not doubting it, but it&rsquo;s at the absolute extreme end of sexual assault, to say nothing of harassment. Those that call everything rape would throw this in the same category as unwanted hair-sniffing or shoulder-touching? It&rsquo;s madness, and she offers no guidance.</p>
<p>We’re all trained to just believe everything we hear, but this seems beyond the pale. I know it must happen sometimes, but the story is presented as if this is a risk that faces anyone at any time. Just like the story of Alexa (included in citations below), where she ended up doing tremendous amounts of blow and being passed around her Wall Street–office like a sex toy. This is not a common danger.</p>
<p>To round out the critique with one of the better ideas from the end of the book (even though the grammar is a bit slapdash):</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;[…] if someone forces you to have sex, it is rape. The narrative that says: good girls don’t get raped; bad girls can’t get raped. In either case, the nuns’ infamous Boys are off the hook. We’ve created a narrative that says that either it didn’t happen to you, or you deserved it.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><h2>Citations</h2><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Weinstein, a Hollywood mogul, has been accused, arrested and indicted for sexually abusing woman after woman for years.10 His victims stayed mostly silent, or if they spoke out, it was only to their closest people. Then, in October 2017, the story burst wide open with a New York Times article about Weinstein’s predatory behavior, which apparently had been an open secret in Hollywood. Star after star said she had been harassed, or worse, by him. Gwyneth Paltrow, Angelina Jolie, Rosanna Arquette, Ashley Judd, Asia Argento, Rose McGowan … the stories were revolting. The response, for the most part, was heartening. Others in the industry lavished support on the women who spoke out. Those who didn’t were a distinct but vocal minority. Words turned out to be more powerful than Harvey Weinstein’s grip on the industry, and certainly more powerful than his dick, which way too many people have seen. Words are the enemy of impunity. They can create real change.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 24</div></div><p>Not indicted. Arrested, but not charged. Perfect example of the exaggerated and quasi-mendacious style.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;In the US, more than ninety percent of people with developmental disabilities are sexually assaulted.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 38</div></div><p>Thats nearly all. No footnote.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;So what? So what if she was the initiator? If she was drunk, or she changed her mind after they were in the room, or she changed her mind after they were both naked and the condom was already on—if she changed her mind at any point, and he didn’t listen, that was the point at which she stopped consenting. There’s no guaranteed ticket to the end of the line.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 48</div></div><p>This runs counter to her prior citation about eliminating the myth of woman as submitter and man as aggressor.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;It’s complicated to look at women’s agency in a system of abuse, but we must.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 48</div></div><p>Why is that? Because it contradicts your all-women-are-victims narrative.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;So often we tend to talk about the victims and the ways they went along with, or took advantage of, or kept suspiciously quiet about, rape. They didn’t leap up and stab the man and go running out clutching their clothes to their outraged bosoms, therefore they consented.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 49</div></div><p>That&rsquo;s different from men using rape as gatekeepers to power. It shouldn&rsquo;t happen either, but these acts are more avoidable. Report and suffer the non-rape consequences. Torch a potential career.</p>
<p>It wasn&rsquo;t consensual sex, but it was a deal. Avoidable by not taking the deal. Shitty that she&rsquo;s blocked from pursuing dreams, yes, but more avoidable and in a different class than assault on a street or in the home or by family.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The case was dismissed. The judge said they were normal men, and therefore they couldn’t be criminals. Audrey had been sexually active before that night, therefore she hadn’t been raped. A friend to whom she explained this reasoning was as flabbergasted by it as I hope you are, dear reader. She&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 52</div></div><p>I don&rsquo;t believe this is so simple as she makes it out to be. In the US?</p>
<p>Maybe. It&rsquo;s very difficult to eliminate this mindset. But her example seems quite extreme.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Sexual predators deserve due process, but they don’t deserve blanket immunity from accusations any more than any other criminals.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 61</div></div><p>Again with the straw man. Even if a lot of people believe this, do you need to spend so much time debunking it? Might as well prove that 2+2=4</p>
<p>Boys will be boys is stupid. So is pretending that people aren&rsquo;t animals who have to be trained to resist biological impulses. Anyone who says they haven&rsquo;t ever felt a nearly overwhelming biological urge is lying, man or woman. Giving in to it without consent is rape. Controlling it takes training.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;All of us men are guilty in some way or the other for these atrocities and crimes against our dear women.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 77</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;As a man, I apologize for what those evil men did. All of us men are guilty in some way or the other for these atrocities and crimes against our dear women. I hope&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 77</div></div><p>Strongly disagree.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;It’s no wonder the conviction rate in American rape trials is abysmal. Consider this: out of every 1,000 rapes,</p>
<p>&ldquo;&rdquo;</p>
<ul>
<li>310 are reported to the police;</li>
<li>57 lead to an arrest;</li>
<li>11 get referred to the court system;</li>
<li>6 rapists go to jail.</li></ul></div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 79</div></div><p>How do we know that&rsquo;s abysmal? Are we assuming all 1000 are true? Abysmal would be false convictions or acquittals of rapists (perversion of justice).</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;In the US, thousands of rape kits (the packets of forensic evidence containing semen, hairs, fibres, etc. collected from victims) are gathering dust awaiting testing while rapists go free.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 82</div></div><p>Ugh.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The official version matters. Sticks and stones may break my bones, and words too will always hurt me.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 82</div></div><p>Always?</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Someone needs to tell Ted that you don’t annoy girls to show them you like them. When Ted goes to college and has an unrequited crush, how’s he going to show it? Ask for a movie date? Or break into the woman’s room and rape her?&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 84</div></div><p>Knock it off, Ted. Ted the third-grader is obviously already a fully formed rapist-in-waiting.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;One of my smarter moves was marrying this man.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 128</div></div><p>You should have had him write this book, I think. This is less a book and more a collection of loose notes and unsubstantiated Live Journal–links on a topic.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Reading these accounts reminds me why it is dangerous when we say that rape has nothing to do with sex.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 139</div></div><p>This is a good point, but could have been made without the possibly entirely apocryphal stroke story from reddit.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;I’m just pointing out that it makes perfect sense to me when I see photographs of famous women smiling and hugging men whom they later point out as rapists. The fact that you have confused feelings about the person who hurt you doesn’t make you guilty. It makes you human.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 149</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Alexa is a Puerto Rican New Yorker.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 151</div></div><p>This lady&rsquo;s story just keeps piling it on. Possibly true, but an absolute disaster of a person. Everything just &ldquo;happened&rdquo; to her. No agency.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Imagine what would be unleashed if so many people didn’t have to waste so much time dealing with flashbacks, secret-keeping, suicidal thoughts, low self-esteem, crippling fear of … everything, and on down the dreary list. Imagine the fantastic, the amazing, the mind-boggling things so many rape survivors could do, say, create or be if they didn’t have to waste time being traumatized and stymied and made small.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 161</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;LIFE, UNLIKE GOLF, doesn’t allow for handicaps when you go out to play. You come yowling out into the world into a random set of circumstances, and they mark you forever, for better or worse.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 162</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;“Late night/early morning, there was a knock on the passenger window. I looked up and saw that it was my ex. I cracked the door. The next thing I know I’m being dragged out of the car and slammed onto the ground. “There were nine guys. Four I had known. The other five were strangers. One was my best friend’s boyfriend. Some had bats. One had a gun. They kicked me and beat me. They zip-tied me and put me in the trunk. They took me to a basement and took turns raping me.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 163</div></div><p>Who does this? madness of the highest order. Who plans this? How do you have nine friends who&rsquo;ll come along on a gang rape/kidnapping party?</p>
<p>We&rsquo;re all trained to just believe everything we hear, but this seems beyond the pale. I know it must happen sometimes, but the story is presented as if this is a risk that faces anyone at any time. Just like the story of Alexa above, where she ended up doing tremendous amounts of blow and being passed around her Wall Street–office like a sex toy. This is not a common danger.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Almost every one—male, female, trans, gender-fluid, gay, straight, bi—had multiple stories of rape. Gang-raped by eleven of his lover’s friends on a hotel terrace; set upon by more than a dozen of her brother’s political rivals in a forest; raped by policemen as the price of staying out of prison and earning money for her children …&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 186</div></div><p>India sounds utterly loathsome. Are there similar undercurrents in America? Switzerland?</p>
<p>I just heard a story yesterday about a school class of a good friend&rsquo;s son in Switzerland. There were boys in his class who were shouting down the teacher, telling her that women&rsquo;s rights aren&rsquo;t relevant and to stop teaching such crap. They were fourteen years old. They&rsquo;ve been removed from the school because they&rsquo;re too unruly, reprobate and likely irredeemable. I wouldn&rsquo;t know where to begin undoing that boy&rsquo;s mindset.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Sangeeta is a second-generation sex worker. She would have liked to do something else, but she couldn’t finish school because of the abuse she got for being a sex worker’s daughter. Her teacher threatened to burn her alive, and she left school and became a sex worker at twelve. She lives with her children and sister. She talked about feeling safe working out of her upstairs room, rather than visiting clients. “If a client calls me somewhere else, and suddenly four or five men appear, that’s rape.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 189</div></div><p>Every word is horrifying.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;if someone forces you to have sex, it is rape. The narrative that says: good girls don’t get raped; bad girls can’t get raped. In either case, the nuns’ infamous Boys are off the hook. We’ve created a narrative that says that either it didn’t happen to you, or you deserved it.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 192</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;It’s time to throw one idiotic notion overboard—the notion that men can’t stop, that there’s a point of no return once you’re sexually aroused. We keep talking about women’s agency, but men have agency too. Guys, tell me this: if you were in the middle of hot sex and really, really into it, and your grandmother walked into the room and peered at you over her glasses, would you stop, or would you keep going?&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 200</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Why they do it is interesting, but after a point I’m more interested in moving along from this unevolved state of human interaction. I don’t want to care about rapists’ motivations. They should just stop. Whether it’s wired in or because their daddy didn’t play with them or they’re just jerks or they’re sexually frustrated or they do it because they can or they do it because they can’t not do it or they’re normal or they’re abnormal, who cares? They should just stop what one superior babysitter once called this “third-class behavior.” Unfortunately we do have to spend time trying to understand, if we’re going to stop it. So yeah, we can’t talk about rape without talking about why men rape.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 201</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;It’s hard to believe in people’s innate humanity when you can go to a local shop in India and buy a rape video for a hundred rupees. That’s a real rape video, by the way, not a simulation. In North India, it’s sometimes euphemistically called a “local video” or a “WhatsApp sex video.”107 You can go to a small general store and buy one for a pittance. Men rape women, film their actions, and then sell the videos. I’d like to say that I have faith in human nature. Human nature is kindness and large-heartedness, compassion and respect. But human nature is also vile and cruel, selfish and entitled.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 208</div></div>      </div>
      </div>
        <div class="footer">
    <div class="footer-data"><div class="footer-links"><ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/contact.php" title="">Contact</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/support.php" title="">Support</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/privacy.php" title="">Privacy</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/rights.php" title="">Rights</a></li></ul></div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="copyright">Copyright (c) 1999-2026 earthli.com. All Rights Reserved.</div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="versions">Powered by <ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore/app_news.php">earthli News 3.7</a></li><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore" title="">earthli WebCore&trade; 3.7</a></li></ul></div></div>    </div>
      </div>
  </div>  </body>
</html>
]]>
  </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
      <title type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[Die Menschheit schafft sich ab by Harald Lesch and Klaus Kamphausen (2016) (read in 2019)]]>
  </title>
    <id>https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3787</id>
    <link href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3787"/>
    <updated>2019-09-11T08:42:44+02:00</updated>
    <author>
        <name type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[Marco von Ballmoos]]>
  </name>
      <uri>https://earthli.com/users/marco</uri>
    </author>
      <summary type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<blockquote class="quote abstract "><div>Disclaimer: these are notes I took while reading this book. They include citations I found interesting or enlightening or particularly well-written. In some cases, I&rsquo;ve pointed out which of these applies to which citation; in others, I have not. Any benefit you gain from reading these notes is... [<a class="complete-text-link" href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3787">More</a>]</div></blockquote>]]>
  </summary>
      <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<html lang="en">
  <head>
    <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/themes/ice.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/fonts/raleway.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/core/medium.css">
  </head>
  <body>
<div class="style-controls">  <div class="page">
    <div class="page-body">
<div class="info-box-top">
<p>
Published by <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_user.php?name=marco" title="Marco von Ballmoos" class="visible">marco</a> on <span class="date-time">11. Sep 2019 08:42:44 (GMT-5)</span>
</p>
</div>
      <div class="text-flow wide">
  <blockquote class="quote abstract "><div>Disclaimer: these are notes I took while reading this book. They include citations I found interesting or enlightening or particularly well-written. In some cases, I&rsquo;ve pointed out which of these applies to which citation; in others, I have not. Any benefit you gain from reading these notes is purely incidental to the purpose they serve of reminding me what I once read. Please see Wikipedia for a summary if I&rsquo;ve failed to provide one sufficient for your purposes. If my notes serve to trigger an interest in this book, then I&rsquo;m happy for you.</div></blockquote><p>This book presents a history of mankind and its efforts that begins in the very early universe and slowly focuses its lens on the modern day. It falls into the category of two other books I&rsquo;ve read this year, <em>Eine Kurze Geschichte der Menschheit</em> and <em>Summa Technologiae</em>. All of these books offer a sweeping look at human and galactic history and scientific knowledge, which serve as a basis for predictions. Harari predicts cybernetics and AI. Lem does as well. Lesch and Kamphausen predict climate catastrophe.</p>
<p>They take us from the Big Bang and the invention of knowledge, the discovery of our planet, continents and then into how the anthropocene has the Earth in its grip.</p>
<p>The authors discuss the conditions and events that led to life on Earth and then the various forms that it took over the eons. They do this in order to juxtapose it against the profound effect that mankind is having on the planet in a comparably ridiculously short amount of time.</p>
<p>While it took hundreds of millions of years for the remains of dinosaurs and plants to turn into pockets of oil and gas in the lithosphere, mankind is now using 1,000,000 years worth of these supplies every year.</p>
<p>Fish of all kinds were five times more abundant as recently as the 1950s and we&rsquo;re taking out twice the replacement rate every year.</p>
<p>We&rsquo;ve killed off almost every creature larger than a cockroach and replaced it with our paltry few domesticated breeds. We burn and burn and burn, emitting far more CO<sub>2</sub> than can be reasonably absorbed by the vegetation that we aren&rsquo;t clear-cutting to make way for monoculture crops.</p>
<p>We&rsquo;re wiping away topsoil in arable lands at prodigious rates.</p>
<p>While the book is quite science-heavy, it&rsquo;s accessible to anyone with a passing interest in the sciences and a modicum of intelligence and willingness to learn. The two authors are both professors and have an entertainingly didactic approach to their material, making sure to define their terms and provide explanation of not-so-common concepts. They definitely make an effort to show just how proven the case is that mankind is doing nearly everything wrong in its approach to using the only home it has. There is no room for doubt that we are driving directly at an immovable wall.</p>
<p>The authors discuss how western civilization—with its amoralism and naked greed and egocentrism—is the main driving force and reason for our predicament. They include a detailed history, with some truly horrific anecdotes:</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Die Neue Welt zählte um 1500 etwa 100 Millionen Menschen, so viele wie die Alte Welt. Innerhalb weniger Jahrzehnte wurden mehr als 90 Millionen Indianer in Nord-, Zentral- und Südamerika von den Krankheitserregern aus dem Abendland dahingerafft, während sich hundert Jahre nach Einführung der Kartoffelknolle die Bevölkerung auf der anderen Seite des Atlantiks verdoppelte. Eine nahrhafte Entwicklungshilfe.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>Before the discovery of the new world, western civilization had already driven itself to the wall once.</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Europa stand Ende des 15. Jahrhunderts unter ökologischen Gesichtspunkten betrachtet an einem Punkt, der mit der heutigen globalen Situation vergleichbar ist. Die Wälder waren fast vernichtet, die meisten Gewässer verschmutzt, die nötigen Rohstoffe so gut with verbraucht, die Nahrung war knapp.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>However, because the population was so much smaller and had not yet industrialized, the damage it did to the planet was limited. It was driving its own extinction, but hadn&rsquo;t yet grown dangerous enough to take the rest of the biosphere with it.</p>
<p>It is very clearly the naked and greed-driven capitalism—a form that ignores costs it incurs (e.g. environmental costs) in order to have more for itself—that is the problem, according to the authors (and, quite frankly, science <em>and</em> common sense):</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Das Eindringen in die Natur der Dinge ist im Anthropozän von herausragender Bedeutung. Aus den technologischen Entwicklungen ergibt sich dann zwangsläufig der Bedarf nach Rohstoffen und Energie. Die sollen natürlich möglichst billig sein, damit die ökonomischen Vorgaben, also die Renditeerwartungen, erfüllt werden können.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>And it&rsquo;s not only other species that suffer and die off in droves under this rapacious system. The system really only &ldquo;works&rdquo; for a very small percentage of humanity itself. That small part holds the rest of the world in thrall, commandeering their meager produce in order to enrich themselves.</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;Wir wissen, die Erde wird nicht wachsen, aber unsere Ansprüche wachsen, – und die Ungerechtigkeit und Ungleichheit wachsen mit.</p>
<p>&ldquo;Müssen wir den Planeten zerstören und andere Menschen in Armut halten, um unser Leben in gewohntem Maß – oder sollte man besser sagen, in gewohnter Maßlosigkeit – fortzuführen?&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote><p>This system has a tremendous number of victims, not only in the rest of the species, but also in humans:</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Der Hunger tötet welt-weit ungefähr 100.000 Menschen täglich. Kaum jemand spricht über diesen Völkermord, von Abhilfe ganz zu schweigen.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>The victims are not only in the present but also in the future. Our desire for &ldquo;freedom&rdquo; uses up resources that are not ours, but that our worldview in no way prevents us from using. We blindly assume that if it has been made available or can be obtained, then it is ours to have.</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Freiheit ist erstens der Kneipenbesuch, und zweitens, dass der Wirt Heizpilze auf den Gehsteig stellt, damit man auch im Januar den Wein und den Barsch draußen genießen kann. Freiheit ist, dass Amerikaner 6,6 Milliarden Kilowattstunden Strom allein für die Weihnachtsbeleuchtung aufwenden, mehr als Tansania im gesamten Jahr verbraucht. Freiheit ist, ein Auto zu bauen (und zu kaufen), das pro Kilometer 224 Gramm Kohlendioxid ausstößt.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Wir leben in einer so unbedingten Freiheit, dass wir der Meinung sind, dass Mobilität gleich Bewegungsfreiheit sei. Egal was es kostet, was es die Natur oder die zukünftigen Generationen kostet—das ist völlig egal. Unsere unbedingte Freiheit steht über allem.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>We are using up these resources at a completely irreplaceable rate:</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Wir sollten uns darüber im Klaren sein, dass die jetzige Form von Mobilität, die diesem unbedingten Freiheitsbegriff unterliegt, zu einem unbedingten Verbrauch führt. Wir haben keine Möglichkeiten dieses Verbrauchte zurückzuholen.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>The solution is obviously to stop doing all of this, but the outlook is bleak.</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Es ist ein bisschen so wie mit dem kategorischen Imperativ. Niemand von uns kann so leben, dass alle seine Handlungen zum allgemeinen Gesetz er hoben werden. Aber er kann sich das Ziel setzen. Er sollte zumindest wissen, wie es richtig wäre und sich daran orientieren.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Scheinbar sind wir auf der Erde in diesem Irrsinn verfangen und als Besitzer solcher Derivate der Meinung: Komm, lass uns doch lieber darauf spekulieren, dass das Ding kaputtgeht. Nur—was machen wir dann? An wen soll die Versicherung auszahlen?&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>They include several essays from other authors about various current topics, like the efficacy of the &ldquo;Energiewende&rdquo; in Germany or the efforts at changing habits and usage in various countries in Europe (though with a focus on Germany).</p>
<h2>Citations</h2><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;Sie kennen doch den Unterschied zwischen Vernunft und Verstand, oder? Der Verstand ist das Instrument der Vernunft, was uns zum vernünftigen Handeln befähigt. Die Vernunft bestimmt mit Weisheit und Moral unsere Handlungsweisen. Und was hat Kopernikus gesagt?</p>
<p>&ldquo;<span class="quote-inline">&ldquo;Seid nicht wie die Tiere! Richtet euch nicht nur nach euren Sinnen, die euch vormachen, dass sich die Welt um euch herum dreht. Nein, es gibt allgemeinere Prinzipien, derer unsere Vernunft mittels unseres Verstandes habhaft werden kann.&rdquo;</span></p>
<p>&ldquo;Diese Prinzipien können uns viel mehr über die Welt verraten, als das, was unsere Sinner uns vorgaukeln.&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 21</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Wenn ein Wissenschaftler sagt, wir haben hier einen Teil des Universums, und dieser Teil funktioniert so ähnlich wie das, was wir von der Erde kennen, dann ist das auch schon sehr bedeutend. Aber zu behaupten, dass das, was wir von der Erde kennen, die physikalischen Gesetze, die Strahlung, der Aufbau der Materie, die Lichtgeschwindigkeit, die Ladungen und vieles mehr, dass das alles überall im Universum genauso funktioniert – so etwas kann doch keiner wissen, niemand kann es überprüfen.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 29</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Schauen wir uns die nächsten Milliarden Jahre im Zeitraffer an. Selbst nach über einer Milliarde Jahre praktizierter Photosynthese im Wasser war noch nicht viel Sauerstoff in die Atmostsphäre gelangt. Der meiste Sauerstoff blieb im Meer und wurde dort chemisch zur Eisenoxidation genutzt. Die biochemischen Kreisläufe führten zu einem immensen Wachstum an Bakterien. Sonst passierte eigentlich nichts. Blicken wir mit dem Fokus auf das Leben auf die gesamte Erdzeit, dann existieren in 90 Prozent der Zeit nur Bakterien und Einzeller. Bakterien ohne Zellkern, die <em>Prokaryoten</em>, und die 10.000-mal größeren <em>Eurkaryoten</em> oder <em>Eurkaryonten</em> mit einem Zellkern.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 66</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;Vorher gab es, wenn überhaupt, immer nur allerkleinste Variationen eines bereits bekannten Themas. Natürlich kann man auch bei den Bakterien Evolution beobachetn, man muss sich nur in Geduld üben. Die einfache Vermehrung durch Verdopplung vollzieht sich rasant, aber Veränderungen dauern ziemlich lange.</p>
<p>&ldquo;Bei den Eukaryonten ist das ganz anders. Jedes neue Lebenwesen stellt eine neue Kombination dar.&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 74</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Mit diesen Ergebnissen gehen wir an die Rekonstruktion historischer Abläufe. Deswegen wissen wir , wie alt das Kohlenstoffmaterial ist, das wir da verbrennen. Wir wissen, was passiert, wenn wir Kohlenstoff oxidieren und welche Energiemengen dabei frei werden. Das alles wissen wir. Zumindest weiss das eine relativ kleine Gruppe, die sich mit Wissenschaft beschäftig oder sich dafür interessiert.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 83</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Sesshafte Kulturen neigen dazu, Arbeit aufzuteilen. Der eine macht dies, der andere jenes. Es bildeten sich Spezialisten heraus, die besser als der Durchschnitt waren.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 135</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Man könnte es auch ganz anders betrachten. Man könnte direkt an den Anfang des Lebens zurückgehen, also vor vier Milliarden Jahren und fragen: Was war eigentlich der wesentliche Unterschied zwischen einer Erde ohne und einer mit Lebewesen? Der Unterschied ist, Lebewesen fangen sofort an, sich den äußeren Bedingungen entweder anzupassen oder ihnen auszuweichen. Scheinbar als hätten sie einen Willen. Die gleichen Atome, die in einer Zelle zu einer Membran zusammengebaut sind, würden sich als einzelne Atome in keiner Weise so verhalten. Aber weil sie in einer bestimmten Struktur auftauchen, entwickeln sie Eigenschaften, die es ihnen ermöglichen, zum Beispiel gewisse Konzentrationssteigerungen innerhalb einer Zelle zu verbessern und damit den Zellbetrieb aufrechtzuerhalten. Wären sie nicht in dieser Struktur, könnten die Atome das nicht.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 144</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Seine erste Reise hatte Kolumbus mit 87 Männern und drei Schiffen unternommen, bereits seine zweite Expedition zählte 17 Schiffe und 1.500 Männer. Dazu brachten die Spanier eine große Zahl von Hausschweinen und Pferden in die neue Welt.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 173</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Die Neue Welt zählte um 1500 etwa 100 Millionen Menschen, so viele wie die Alte Welt. Innerhalb weniger Jahrzehnte wurden mehr als 90 Millionen Indianer in Nord-, Zentral- und Südamerika von den Krankheitserregern aus dem Abendland dahingerafft, während sich hundert Jahre nach Einführung der Kartoffelknolle die Bevölkerung auf der anderen Seite des Atlantiks verdoppelte. Eine nahrhafte Entwicklungshilfe.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 173</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;Europa stand Ende des 15. Jahrhunderts unter ökologischen Gesichtspunkten betrachtet an einem Punkt, der mit der heutigen globalen Situation vergleichbar ist. Die Wälder waren fast vernichtet, die meisten Gewässer verschmutzt, die nötigen Rohstoffe so gut with verbraucht, die Nahrung war knapp.</p>
<p>&ldquo;Europa entdeckte einen neuen Kontinent und konnte so seinen Kopf aus der Schlinge ziehen. Wir haben heute aber nur diese eine erde und keine Neue Welt, die entdeckt und ausgeplündert werden kann.&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 174</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Es wurden Götter verehrt, es wurde das Individuum verehrt – aber jetzt hat man etwas Abstraktes. Die abendländische Gesellschaft wandelt sich in eine Gesellschaft des Abstrakten. Sie wird sich weiter von der unmittelbaren Anschauung entfernen und dabei Wissenschaftsbereiche erschließen, die heute allgemein geläufig sind, damals aber eine Revolution darstellten.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 187</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;Das erste Kraftwerk, das Sonnenstrahlung nutzen sollte, entstand bereits – zumindest in Gedanken – in den ersten zehn Jahren des 20. Jahrhunderts. Es sollte viele Jahrzehnte dauern, bis mal wieder jemand auf die Idee kam die Sonnenstrahlung für die Produktion von Strom anzuzapfen.</p>
<p>&ldquo;Der Erste Weltkrieg hat viele Entwicklungen zerstört. Er war aber auch ein Schlachtfeld der neuen Technologien. Die damals ein-gesetzte Waffentechnik war für ihre Zeit Hightech. Heraklit hatte schon recht: <em>Der Krieg ist oft der Vater aller Dinge.</em> Für die Grundlagenforschung und die technologische Entwicklung der Wissenschaft war das Militär schon immer ein großer Geldgeber.</p>
<p>&ldquo;Neben der Ökonomisierung findet auch eine Militarisierung der Welt statt. Militarisierung, Kolonialisierung, Globalisierung. Das Ganze funktioniert nur, weil die Physik, die Chemie, die Biologie, die Geowissenschaften mitmachen. Kausalitäten anbieten, Ursache-Wirkung-Erkenntnisse. Dieses fast lückenlose Wissen kommt in die Welt, und die macht damit, was sie will. Und was will sie? Die einen wollen Geld, die anderen Kontrolle und Macht.&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 207</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;Die Lichtgeschwindigkeit ist für uns völlig unvorstellbar. Das gilt auch für das Planck&rsquo;sche Wirkungsquantum als kleinste Einheit von Wirkung. Unvorstellbar! Trotzdem wird sich auf die Formeln E = mc<sup>2</sup> der speziellen Relativitätstheorie und dem E = h × f von Planck alles gründen, was von nun an im 20. Jahrhundert technologisch von Bedeutung ist.</p>
<p>&ldquo;Das Eindringen in die Natur der Dinge ist im Anthropozän von herausragender Bedeutung. Aus den technologischen Entwicklungen ergibt sich dann zwangsläufig der Bedarf nach Rohstoffen und Energie. Die sollen natürlich möglichst billig sein, damit die ökonomischen Vorgaben, also die Renditeerwartungen, erfüllt werden können.&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 210</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;Wir wissen, die Erde wird nicht wachsen, aber unsere Ansprüche wachsen, – und die Ungerechtigkeit und Ungleichheit wachsen mit.</p>
<p>&ldquo;Müssen wir den Planeten zerstören und andere Menschen in Armut halten, um unser Leben in gewohntem Maß – oder sollte man besser sagen, in gewohnter Maßlosigkeit – fortzuführen?</p>
<p>&ldquo;Es ist keine Zeit mehr für ein Lavieren zwischen gut denken und es könnte doch klappen. Die Menschheit bewegt sich bereits seit mehreren Jahrzehnten, seit 1987, in einem ökologischen Defizit, das von Jahr zu Jahr wächst und mehr Biokapazität des Planeten Erde unwiederbringlich zerstört.&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 240</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;Umweltökonomische Bewertungen werden oft kritisiert, weil ökonomische Bewertungen von Natur zur Verdrängung moralischer Argumente für den Umweltschutz führen, weil sie auf einem anthropozentrischen Weltbild basieren und monetäre Werte in den Mittelpunkt stellen.</p>
<p>&ldquo;Diese Kritik ist durchaus gerechtfertigt. Aber den ökonomisch denkenden Menschen der heutigen Leistungsgesellschaft, die Schäden an der Natur als unvermeidbare Begleiterscheinung ih-res Tuns abtun, öffnet diese Zahl vielleicht einen anderen Blick auf die natürlichen Werte der Erde. Oder kennen Sie einen Staat, der seine jährliche Abfallproduktion, die Zerstörung natürlicher Ressourcen und seine jährliche Gesamtemission von CO2 und anderen Klimagasen als Minuswert in die Berechnung seines jährlich erwirtschafteten Bruttosozialproduktes einbezieht?&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 241</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;In Jean Zieglers Buch <em>Wir lassen sie verhungern, München 2012</em> steht nachzulesen, dass in dieser Welt voller Überfluss alle fünf Sekunden ein Kind unter zehn Jahren verhungert. Für Jean Ziegler ist das nicht nur ein — oder ein Systemfehler, sondern eine Schande, ein Skandal, organisiertes Verbrechen und Massenmord, den es augenblicklich zu beenden gilt. Jean Ziegler. „Der Hunger tötet welt-weit ungefähr 100.000 Menschen täglich. Kaum jemand spricht über diesen Völkermord, von Abhilfe ganz zu schweigen.&ldquo;&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 266</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;Aus diesen wenigen Exponentialkurven, aus diesen Wachstums-kurven, diesen Hockeyschlägerkurven lässt sich für einen gesunden Menschenverstand mit einem schnellen Blick ablesen, dass wir nicht weitermachen können wie in den letzten 150 bis 200 Jahren. Irgendwann ist die Party vorbei. Jede dieser Kurven wird irgendwann ein Limit durchbrechen, die Konsequenzen sind nicht mehr berechen- geschweige denn beherrschbar.</p>
<p>&ldquo;Diese Hockeykurven zeigen uns aber zwei Dinge: Erstens, wir können massive Veränderungen vornehmen und bewirken. Und zweitens: Bisher haben wir das allerdings in die falsche Richtung getan.&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 317</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;2015 wurden weltweit 3,5 Milliarden Flugpassagiere gezählt. Für 2035 wird die doppelte Anzahl prognostiziert. Knapp 20.000 zivile Passagierflugzeuge sind weltweit im Einsatz. In 20 Jahren werden es nach Prognosen von Airbus und Boeing zwischen30 und 35 Tausend sein. Die Flugkilometer aller Passagiere 2015 addieren sich auf rund 6,3 Billionen Kilometer. Fliegen ist heute so selbstverständlich wie Busfahren.</p>
<p>&ldquo;Aber warum eigentlich? Klar ist doch: Die fossilen Brennstoffe. Benzin, Kerosin oder Schweröl werden immer weniger und sind endlich. Wieso verbrennen wir dann immer mehr davon, nur um möglichst schnell und luxuriös von A nach B zu kommen? Wie wird die Mobilität in der Zukunft aussehen müssen, ohne dass der Mensch seine Existenz auf diesem Planeten voll vor die Wand fährt?&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 380</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Wir leben in einer so unbedingten Freiheit, dass wir der Meinung sind, dass Mobilität gleich Bewegungsfreiheit sei. Egal was es kostet, was es die Natur oder die zukünftigen Generationen kostet − das ist völlig egal. Unsere unbedingte Freiheit steht über allem.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 381</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Wir sollten uns darüber im Klaren sein, dass die jetzige Form von Mobilität, die diesem unbedingten Freiheitsbegriff unterliegt, zu einem unbedingten Verbrauch führt. Wir haben keine Möglichkeiten dieses Verbrauchte zurückzuholen.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 381</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Ein kapitalistisches Wirtschaftssystem kann nicht langsamer werden. Es lebt von einer systemimmanenten Steigerungsdynamik; schon durch die Logik der Kapitalakkumulation und der Umschlagsgeschwindigkeiten von Kapital. Aber auch auf der kulturellen Seite gibt es da dieses Moment, die Welt in Reichweite zu bringen, wahrnehmbarer zu machen. Solange wir das nicht mit bedenken, ist die Idee, einfach mal langsam zu machen, allenfalls funktionale Entschleunigung.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 386</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;Es ist ein bisschen so wie mit dem kategorischen Imperativ. Niemand von uns kann so leben, dass alle seine Handlungen zum allgemeinen Gesetz er hoben werden. Aber er kann sich das Ziel setzen. Er sollte zumindest wissen, wie es richtig wäre und sich daran orientieren. Mehr als eine Leitlinie kann auch diese Agenda 2030 für nachhaltige Entwicklung nicht sein. Bleibt die Hoffnung, dass möglichst viele Menschen diese Vorgaben beherzigen und umsetzen, damit sich bis 2030 auf der Welt tatsächlich etwas ändert. </p>
<p>&ldquo;Wir wissen alle, dass solch ambitionierten Ziele nicht vollständig erreich: werden können, aber manchmal ist es schon besser, nach dem absolut Unmöglichen zu streben, damit das Mögliche überhaupt erreicht werden kann. In diesem Sinne machen Sie mit!&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Natürlich können wir uns fragen: Was macht den Menschen aus? Ist es der freie Wille? Eine Diskussion, die wir aus der Hirnforschung kennen. Die bestreitet, dass wir einen freien Willen haben. Das ist eben genau diese Pervertierung der wissenschaftlichen Vernunft, die auch im Bereich der künstlichen Intelligenz zu einer gewissen Hybris führt. Dass wir glauben, dass der Mensch nicht mehr als ein Zahlengebilde sei, das man vermessen, steuern, analysieren und prognostizieren kann. Der Mensch wird auf das Biologistische reduziert.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 398</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;Es kommen teilweise Geschäftsmodelle auf, die einfach non-compliant sind, die stehen nicht im Einklang mit der Rechtsordnung. Solche Beispiele finden wir bei Uber, bei Airbnb. Wir wissen, dass das eigentlich illegale Hotel- oder illegale Personenbeförderungsbetriebe sind. Trotzdem sind es neue Ideen, die durch die Digitalisierung möglich wurden.</p>
<p>&ldquo;Die Frage ist, was haben wir auf der einen Seite an schützenswerten Dingen im sozialen Bereich, im Bereich der mensch-lichen Arbeit mit einer entsprechenden Entlohnung?</p>
<p>&ldquo;Müssen wir das zerstören lassen, nur weil die Digitalisierung andere Geschäftsmodelle ermöglicht, oder wollen wir das schützen? Da muss es zur Debatte kommen. Wenn wir das einfach so laufen lassen, dann geht es erst mal sehr durcheinander. Weiter setzen wir etwas aufs Spiel, was wir eigentlich als gute Gesellschaftsordnung empfinden.&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 400</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;Es ist ja gut und wichtig, dass dieser Tage so leidenschaftlich über Flüchtlingsströme, Terror und die Zukunft Europas diskutiert wird. Zugleich ist es erschreckend, wie wenig über die Zusammenballung des Kapitals in den Händen einiger weniger geredet wird. Da könnte es nämlich einen Zusammenhang geben.</p>
<p>&ldquo;„Empört Euch&rdquo;, hatte der französische Intellektuelle und Résistance-Kämpfer Stephane Nessel einst die Jugend im Kampf gegen den Finanzkapitalismus ermahnt.&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 409</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;[…] die Vereinten Nationen [sind] das Beste was wir haben. Es gibt keinen anderen Völkerbund. Es gibt für uns keine Alternative, als immer wieder aufs Neue die Menschheit aufzurufen, sich an solchen Zielen zu orientieren und zu versuchen, sie zu erreichen.</p>
<p>&ldquo;Es ist ein bisschen so wie mit dem kategorischen Imperativ. Niemand von uns kann so leben, dass alle seine Handlungen zum allgemeinen Gesetz er-hoben werden. Aber er kann sich das Ziel setzen. Er sollte zumindest wissen wie es richtig wäre und sich daran orientieren. Mehr als eine Leitlinie kann auch diese Agenda 2030 für nachhaltige Entwicklung nicht sein. Bleibt die Hoffnung, dass möglichst viele Menschen diese Vorgaben beherzigen und umsetzen, damit sich bis 2030 auf der Welt tatsächlich etwas ändert.&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 424</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;In einem Kommentar der Süddeutschen Zeitung schrieb Detlef Esslinger: „Es wäre geboten, die Lebensart in den reichen, freien Gesellschaften als beides wahrzunehmen: als Errungenschaft und als gigantisches Problem. Gelebt wird hier ein Freiheitsverständnis, das absolut ist. Nichts ist den Menschen hier fremder als Beschränkung im persönlichen Alltag. Freiheit ist erstens der Kneipenbesuch, und zweitens, dass der Wirt Heizpilze auf den Gehsteig stellt, damit man auch im Januar den Wein und den Barsch draußen genießen kann. Freiheit ist, dass Amerikaner 6,6 Milliarden Kilowattstunden Strom allein für die Weihnachtsbeleuchtung aufwenden, mehr als Tansania im gesamten Jahr verbraucht. Freiheit ist, ein Auto zu bauen (und zu kaufen), das pro Kilometer 224 Gramm Kohlendioxid ausstößt.&ldquo;&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 429</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Das erinnert fatal an die alte Sowjetunion, als versucht wurde, das Klima zu verändern, indem sibirische Flüsse, die eigentlich nach Norden fließen, umgeleitet wurden. Das ging in die Hose. Es ist erstaunlich, wie viele Naturwissenschaftler von diesem Machbarkeitswahn geschüttelt sind.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 435</div></div><p>They&rsquo;ve used these examples many times, but haven&rsquo;t mentioned the massive projects in the western Unites States. Phoenix, Los Angeles and Las Vegas wouldn&rsquo;t exist without giant projects that were equally offensive to nature.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;[…] das Pumpen, Bohren, Schürfen, Explorieren,Transportieren und Raffinieren immer billiger und effizienter wird. Die Vorstellung, dass uns die Mineralien ausgehen − ich sage jetzt: <em>leider</em> − ist völlig verkehrt. Der Erdmantel ist erstaunlich dick. Selbst Erdöl und Gas findet sich da noch eine ganze Menge. Seltene Erden, Gold, was immer man will, ist massenweise da. Aber wie <em>Ugo Bardi</em> in einem eindringlichen Bericht an den Club of Rome geschildert hat, wird die Zerstörung pro gewonnenem Kilo immer schlimmer.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 442</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;EUvW: Das ist in den asiatischen Kulturkreisen stärker verankert als in den monotheistischen. Ich setze − vielleicht als typischer Intellektueller − darauf, dass das menschliche Bewusstsein eine der wichtigsten Antriebskräfte ist. Wenn die meisten Menschen in dem Primitivbewusstsein leben, dass es nur darauf ankommt, in einem grausamen Wettbewerb zu bestehen und im Sinne einer kurzfristigen Erfolgslogik immer stärker zu werden, dann kommen wir überhaupt nicht weiter. Wir müssen also dafür sorgen, dass das Bewusstsein der Mehrheit der Menschen schließlich zu einer Ablösung dieses egoistischen, kurzfristigen, zerstörerischen Kapitalismus und der Finanzmarktverherrlichung führt, dass die Mehrheiten das ablehnen und überwinden.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 448</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;HL: Wenn wir uns ansehen, wer heute am meisten verbraucht und emittiert, würden Sie dann bei China immer noch sagen …</p>
<p>&ldquo;EUvW: Also, pro Kopf sind die Chinesen gar nicht so schlecht. Und im Übrigen, in dem 13. Fünfjahresplan hat das Zentralkomitee stramme Umweltveränderungen vorgeschrieben, das ist beschlossene Sache. Ich finde, die Chinesen sind allein schon aus diesem Grund sehr zu loben. Noch etwas, das viel dramatischere Auswirkungen hat: China ist das einzige Land der Erde, das eine Stabilisierung der Bevölkerung geplant und durchgesetzt hat.</p>
<p>&ldquo;HL: Zugleich hat man den Eindruck, dass sie sehr schnell lernen. Sie machen schnell Fehler, lernen aber auch daraus. Bei den Erneuerbaren Energien, ob Windkraft oder Solarpower, ist China vorn mit dabei. Da können wir Europäer viel abschauen. Warum hängen wir da so nach? Liegt es daran, dass wir schon so eine saturierte Gesellschaft sind?&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 449</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;Gerade dieses <em>Im-Griff-haben</em>, glaube ich, ist die Hybris der Moderne in all ihren Verirrungen. Wenn ich daran denke, dass wir bei einem Weltbruttosozialprodukt von 70 Billionen Dollar Derivate, also Versicherungsscheine von 700 Billionen halten, ist das ungefähr so, als wenn ich mir ein Auto für 2.000 Euro kaufe und es für 20.000 Euro versichere. Was für ein Interesse habe ich dann noch, dass dieser Wagen heilbleibt? Mein Interesse ist doch viel größer, dass er kaputtgeht.</p>
<p>&ldquo;Scheinbar sind wir auf der Erde in diesem Irrsinn verfangen und als Besitzer solcher Derivate der Meinung: Komm, lass uns doch lieber darauf spekulieren, dass das Ding kaputtgeht. Nur − was machen wir dann? An wen soll die Versicherung auszahlen?</p>
<p>&ldquo;Wir haben nur diesen einen Planeten. Außerirdische werden uns nicht retten, ganz bestimmt nicht.&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 454</div></div>      </div>
      </div>
        <div class="footer">
    <div class="footer-data"><div class="footer-links"><ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/contact.php" title="">Contact</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/support.php" title="">Support</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/privacy.php" title="">Privacy</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/rights.php" title="">Rights</a></li></ul></div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="copyright">Copyright (c) 1999-2026 earthli.com. All Rights Reserved.</div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="versions">Powered by <ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore/app_news.php">earthli News 3.7</a></li><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore" title="">earthli WebCore&trade; 3.7</a></li></ul></div></div>    </div>
      </div>
  </div>  </body>
</html>
]]>
  </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
      <title type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[Starlings by Jo Walton (2018) (read in 2019)]]>
  </title>
    <id>https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3753</id>
    <link href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3753"/>
    <updated>2019-07-27T22:59:01+02:00</updated>
    <author>
        <name type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[Marco von Ballmoos]]>
  </name>
      <uri>https://earthli.com/users/marco</uri>
    </author>
      <summary type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<blockquote class="quote abstract "><div>Disclaimer: these are notes I took while reading this book. They include citations I found interesting or enlightening or particularly well-written. In some cases, I&rsquo;ve pointed out which of these applies to which citation; in others, I have not. Any benefit you gain from reading these notes is... [<a class="complete-text-link" href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3753">More</a>]</div></blockquote>]]>
  </summary>
      <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<html lang="en">
  <head>
    <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/themes/ice.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/fonts/raleway.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/core/medium.css">
  </head>
  <body>
<div class="style-controls">  <div class="page">
    <div class="page-body">
<div class="info-box-top">
<p>
Published by <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_user.php?name=marco" title="Marco von Ballmoos" class="visible">marco</a> on <span class="date-time">27. Jul 2019 22:59:01 (GMT-5)</span>
</p>
</div>
      <div class="text-flow wide">
  <blockquote class="quote abstract "><div>Disclaimer: these are notes I took while reading this book. They include citations I found interesting or enlightening or particularly well-written. In some cases, I&rsquo;ve pointed out which of these applies to which citation; in others, I have not. Any benefit you gain from reading these notes is purely incidental to the purpose they serve of reminding me what I once read. Please see Wikipedia for a summary if I&rsquo;ve failed to provide one sufficient for your purposes. If my notes serve to trigger an interest in this book, then I&rsquo;m happy for you.</div></blockquote><p>I&rsquo;d recently read about Jo Walton, that she&rsquo;d won several awards (Hugo, Nebula) and was intrigued. I grabbed the only book the library had available, a book of her short stories. Her preface, though, indicated that she wasn&rsquo;t really a short-story writer and had never really understood the genre. She was, unfortunately, right. I think she&rsquo;s a good writer, but her short stories felt too underdeveloped. Several of the stories—she admitted—were just books she&rsquo;d started and never finished. There were some interesting ideas, but nothing really memorable.</p>
<p>I&rsquo;ll try again with a full-length novel.</p>
<h2>Citations</h2><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Oh, wait until you’re eighty-nine, my proper little daughter-in-law, wait until They’re conspiring against you and taking your books away before you’re so quick to judge.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 45</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Oh, wait until you’re eighty-nine, my proper little daughter-in-law, wait until They’re conspiring against you and taking your books away before you’re so quick to judge. Janice is part of the conspiracy, I think. She talks in code. She spells words out, and speaks in French. I think this is a blind meant to put me off. Richard had the grace to look uncomfortable when they shuffled me into this place and stole my books. Oh, they’d already replaced them with ones with wriggling letters, all but the ones where the print was too small to read even with strong glasses.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 45</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The Soviet Union crumbled away in 1989 and let its end of the Overton Window go, and the world slid rightwards.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 92</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;what’s the point of anything? We didn’t volunteer to be here, we’re here because our ancestors made certain decisions. We could change those decisions for ourselves, and for our descendants.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 130</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Above the clouds, above the whole planet, is the sun, and beyond the sun other more distant suns, and the whole turning galaxy. In that scale, one jellyfish doesn’t matter any more than Adam and Eve, any more than the whole Earth. There’s everything in the universe in this story; except answers.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 152</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Britney rocked a moment, and then she said, “You know, I’m glad you asked me that question. I was born from a tank myself, and my whole generation, as you know. The thing is, when the ship first landed we only had what we’d brought from Earth, before we got the Mufug Plant set up, and even then, it could only make certain things, not like today. So when I was growing up, in the orphanage, and when I was first married we didn’t have any dishes big enough to take a whole ham, so we used to cut the end off to fit in the dish.” And Walter laughed, and Britney smiled her sweet smile, and Maud laughed, and Arabetsy, who was the only one of the children old enough to understand, laughed until she almost fell off the balcony into the sea.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 164</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;She was the only one I ever loved, and the only one I’d ever thought of loving.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 165</div></div><p>This grammar is so common and so sloppy. Right in the same sentence. Unjustifiable.</p>
      </div>
      </div>
        <div class="footer">
    <div class="footer-data"><div class="footer-links"><ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/contact.php" title="">Contact</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/support.php" title="">Support</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/privacy.php" title="">Privacy</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/rights.php" title="">Rights</a></li></ul></div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="copyright">Copyright (c) 1999-2026 earthli.com. All Rights Reserved.</div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="versions">Powered by <ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore/app_news.php">earthli News 3.7</a></li><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore" title="">earthli WebCore&trade; 3.7</a></li></ul></div></div>    </div>
      </div>
  </div>  </body>
</html>
]]>
  </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
      <title type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[Dreyer's English by Benjamin Dreyer (2019) (read in 2019)]]>
  </title>
    <id>https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3751</id>
    <link href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3751"/>
    <updated>2019-07-27T22:58:43+02:00</updated>
    <author>
        <name type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[Marco von Ballmoos]]>
  </name>
      <uri>https://earthli.com/users/marco</uri>
    </author>
      <summary type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<blockquote class="quote abstract "><div>Disclaimer: these are notes I took while reading this book. They include citations I found interesting or enlightening or particularly well-written. In some cases, I&rsquo;ve pointed out which of these applies to which citation; in others, I have not. Any benefit you gain from reading these notes is... [<a class="complete-text-link" href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3751">More</a>]</div></blockquote>]]>
  </summary>
      <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<html lang="en">
  <head>
    <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/themes/ice.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/fonts/raleway.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/core/medium.css">
  </head>
  <body>
<div class="style-controls">  <div class="page">
    <div class="page-body">
<div class="info-box-top">
<p>
Published by <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_user.php?name=marco" title="Marco von Ballmoos" class="visible">marco</a> on <span class="date-time">27. Jul 2019 22:58:43 (GMT-5)</span>
</p>
</div>
      <div class="text-flow wide">
  <blockquote class="quote abstract "><div>Disclaimer: these are notes I took while reading this book. They include citations I found interesting or enlightening or particularly well-written. In some cases, I&rsquo;ve pointed out which of these applies to which citation; in others, I have not. Any benefit you gain from reading these notes is purely incidental to the purpose they serve of reminding me what I once read. Please see Wikipedia for a summary if I&rsquo;ve failed to provide one sufficient for your purposes. If my notes serve to trigger an interest in this book, then I&rsquo;m happy for you.</div></blockquote><p>Dreyer is copy chief at Random House Books. He throws his hat into the ring, offering sage and drily humorous grammatical advice based on his 30 years of experience. For nitty gritty and details of grammar, he refers readers to the classic style guides. His book is for broad strokes about the various linguistic constructs and common patterns, tropes and styles he&rsquo;s encountered—and that he&rsquo;d like to stop encountering.</p>
<p>He is, at core, pragmatic:</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;A good sentence, I find myself saying frequently, is one that the reader can follow from beginning to end, no matter how long it is, without having to double back in confusion because the writer misused or omitted a key piece of punctuation, chose a vague or misleading pronoun, or in some other way engaged in inadvertent misdirection.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>But he isn&rsquo;t a pedantic or precise scientist, either. While I&rsquo;m willing to be convinced by his argument for serial commas—always use them, because they&rsquo;re often helpful, so why not just get used to them?—he argues in the opposite manner when writing about hyphens, where he argues that <span class="quote-inline">&ldquo;convention […] allows for exceptions in some cases in which a misreading is unlikely, as in, say: real estate agent or high school students&rdquo;</span>, to which I say, why?</p>
<p>Who would it harm to clean up English&rsquo;s ridiculous word-concatenation rules (or is it &ldquo;word concatenation&rdquo; or why not wordconcatentation)? Some agglutinations take a space, others none and others a hyphen—pretty much depending on how long the compound has existed and … whimsy. I prefer throwing an extra hyphen at real-estate agents or high-school students simply because there is often so much confusion where neither the author nor the copy editor anticipated there being some.</p>
<p>I&rsquo;m grateful for his having cleared up proper-name hyphenation for me, though, as well as the proper use of hyphens and en dashes (which I&rsquo;d heretofore used <em>almost</em> correctly).</p>
<p>He throws in chapters on oft-misused vocabulary—as well as some rare, but lovely, vocabulary—as well as a couple on idioms and common constructs. Some of the chapters are just lists, but that makes this an excellent reference.</p>
<h2>Citations</h2><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;A good sentence, I find myself saying frequently, is one that the reader can follow from beginning to end, no matter how long it is, without having to double back in confusion because the writer misused or omitted a key piece of punctuation, chose a vague or misleading pronoun, or in some other way engaged in inadvertent misdirection. (If you want to puzzle your reader, that’s your own business.)&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 7</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;All this said, there’s nothing wrong with sentences constructed in the passive voice—you’re simply choosing where you want to put the sentence’s emphasis—and I see nothing objectionable in, say, The floors were swept, the beds made, the rooms aired out. Since the point of interest is the cleanness of the house and not the identity of the cleaner. But many a sentence can be improved by putting its true protagonist at the beginning, so that’s something to be considered.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 14</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;[…] give you one of my favorite novel openers of all time, that of Charles Dickens’s Bleak House:&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 15</div></div><p><em>Bleak House</em> reads like Dostoyevsky.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Whatever you want to call it: Use it. I don’t want to belabor the point; neither am I willing to negotiate it. Only godless savages eschew the series comma.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 24</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Q. When do I precede a sentence-ending “too” with a comma, and when not? A. Whichever you choose, the other way will look better.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 32</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;If you’re offering a piece of information that’s perhaps interesting amplification but might well be deleted without harm, offer it up with a comma and a “which”: Please fetch me the Bible, which is on the table. One Bible and one Bible only. The “that” vs. “which” rule is not universally observed, I must note. Some writers find it pushily constricting and choose between the two by ear. I find it helpful and, admiring consistency as I do, apply it consistently.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 34</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;It’s that comma after “population” I’m wanting you to keep a good eye on, because it has a tendency to go missing. It’s so frequently omitted in published British prose that for a long time I thought they had some national rule against it. They don’t. They’re just sloppy.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 34</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;However, convention (a.k.a. tradition, a.k.a. consensus, a.k.a. it’s simply how it’s done, so don’t argue with it) allows for exceptions in some cases in which a misreading is unlikely, as in, say: real estate agent or high school students&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 57</div></div><p>This contradicts the advice about the serial comma, in which the advice was to just consistently do it one way. Here we have to decide if it&rsquo;s confusing?</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Generally—yes, exceptions apart, there are always exceptions—one wields a hyphen or hyphens in these before-the-noun (there goes another one) adjectival cases to avoid that momentary unnecessary hesitation we’re always trying to spare our readers.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 58</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Now, mind you, this confusion kicked off and resolved itself in seconds. And I assure you, I’m not shamming; you may possibly have read the sentence correctly on your first attempt, but I was flummoxed. Surely, though, the confusion might have been avoided entirely had the sentence simply read: Touch-averse people who don’t want to be hugged are not rude.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 58</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;An en dash is used to hold words together instead of your standard hyphen, which usually does the trick just fine, when one is connecting a multiword proper noun to another multiword proper noun or to pretty much anything else. What the heck does that mean? It means this: a Meryl Streep–Robert De Niro comedy a New York–to–Chicago flight a World War II–era plane a Pulitzer Prize–winning play Basically, that which you’re connecting needs a smidgen more connecting than can be accomplished with a hyphen.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 63</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Go light on the exclamation points. When overused, they’re bossy, hectoring, and, ultimately, wearying. Some writers recommend that you should use no more than a dozen exclamation points per book; others insist that you should use no more than a dozen exclamation points in a lifetime.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 65</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;I suppose it’s an obvious point, but if a style choice follows the rules but results in something that looks awful or makes no sense on the page, rethink it.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 67</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;(I have an exceptionally large bone to pick with The New York Times, which persists in imposing its preference for “theater” on edifices and companies not named thus, here and abroad. The paper’s constant references to London’s “National Theater” are, on so many levels, galling. That’s not its name.)&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 80</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;And yet: I now have a colleague whose pronoun of choice is “they,” and thus the issue is no longer culturally abstract but face-to-face personal, no longer an issue I’d persuaded myself was none of my business but one of basic human respect I chose—choose—to embrace. (I’m happy to call myself out for stubbornly avoiding the topic till it became personal. One is supposed to be better than that; one often isn’t.)&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 94</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;And somehow I read Wolcott Gibbs’s double-edged sword of an epigram far too often as a mandate not to preserve respectfully but to fix: to take the rules I’d learned and been taught and boned up on and impose them on writers not so blessed with my knowledge and expertise. I must have been insufferable.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 121</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The lesson being that notwithstanding all the commonly asserted rules of prose one has been taught in school or read about in stylebooks, authors do, as Wolcott Gibbs recognized and, now, so do I, have their preservable styles, and the role of a copy editor is, above all else, to assist and enhance and advise rather than to correct—indeed, not to try to transform a book into the copy editor’s notion of what a good book should be but, simply and with some measure of humility, to help fulfill an author’s vision and make each book into the ideal version of itself.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 122</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Conversely, real-life nonnative speakers of English, I find, rarely lapse into their native tongue simply to say yes, no, or thank you.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 125</div></div><p>Even ostensibly erudite Americans have woefully little contact with the mixed-language world. This is patently false. People mix languages all the time. In fact, it&rsquo;s rare to hear someone who is bilingual stick to only one language. Americans are so underexposed to bilingual people that it&rsquo;s kind of shocking.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;You could certainly do worse than to follow the standard of Gore Vidal’s immortal Myra Breckinridge: “I am fortunate in having no gift at all for characterizing in prose the actual speech of others and so, for literary purposes, I prefer to make everyone sound like me.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 125</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Oh, and this is crucial: The important thing to remember about peeves and crotchets is that your own peeves and crotchets reflect sensible preferences based on a refined appreciation of the music and meaning of the English language, and that everyone else’s are the products of diseased minds.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 149</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;As to people who object to supermarket express-lane signs reading “10 ITEMS OR LESS”? On the one hand, I hear you. On the other hand, get a hobby. Maybe flower arranging, or decoupage.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 156</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;In the 1906 edition of The King’s English, H. W. Fowler declared—and he was neither the first nor the last person to so declare—“A thing is unique, or not unique; there are no degrees of uniqueness; nothing is ever somewhat or rather unique, though many things are almost or in some respects unique.” I will allow that something can be virtually unique but can’t be more than—not very, not especially, not really—unique.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 165</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;“Bated,” which you are unlikely to chance upon disattached from the word “breath,” means reduced or moderated or suspended. To await something with bated breath is to await it with thrilled tension, to be on (to use a grand old word) tenterhooks.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 172</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;“Breech” is an outmoded term for buttocks; thus trousers were once breeches. A breech birth is one in which the baby emerges buttocks (or feet) first.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 174</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Use the former [descendant] as a noun, for progeny and progeny’s progeny; use the latter [descendent] as an adjective to describe said progenies, or to describe something moving downward.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 181</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;New York’s legendary Collyer brothers, Homer and Langley, were hoarders of just about anything they could cram into their Fifth Avenue townhouse. Their hoarding ultimately led to their grisly deaths, Langley crushed by a would-be defensive booby trap and poor blind, helpless Homer subsequently starving to death. The More You Know. [1]&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 190</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;the comedy team Abbott and (Lou) Costello, whose “Who’s on first?” routine is an acknowledged delight but whose perhaps lesser-known Bagel Street sketch (also known as the Susquehanna Hat Company sketch) is one of the funniest things in the history of Western civilization.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 211</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;[Rara Avis is] Latin for “rare bird,” and a remarkably pretentious way of saying that something is unusual.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 241</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;“Retronym” is a term coined by the journalist Frank Mankiewicz in 1980 to identify a new term coined to replace a term whose meaning, once clear, has become clouded or outmoded, often by some technological advance. For instance: What was once simply a watch became, with the invention of digital watches, an analog watch. Ordinary guitars were dubbed, after the electric ones showed up, acoustic guitars. No one ever referred to a landline till mobile phones became the thing. Closer to home, one had no cause to refer to a hardcover book till paperbacks were invented, nor to refer to a mass-market paperback (those are the little ones you find in spinning drugstore racks) till those larger, svelter, more expensive editions we call trade paperbacks appeared.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 251</div></div><p><hr></p>
<div class="footnote-reference"><span id="footnote_DRAFTABLE_ENTRY_3751_1_body" class="footnote-number">[1]</span> I&rsquo;ve since read more about them in <a href="https://allthatsinteresting.com/collyer-brothers">The Disturbing Tale Of The Collyer Brothers, History&rsquo;s Worst Hoarders</a> by <cite>Gabe Peoletti</cite> (<cite><a href="http://allthatsinteresting.com/">All That&#039;s Interesting</a></cite>) and it&rsquo;s even sadder than it sounds. In retrospect, I find Dreyer is a bit flip about the whole thing.</div>      </div>
      </div>
        <div class="footer">
    <div class="footer-data"><div class="footer-links"><ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/contact.php" title="">Contact</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/support.php" title="">Support</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/privacy.php" title="">Privacy</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/rights.php" title="">Rights</a></li></ul></div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="copyright">Copyright (c) 1999-2026 earthli.com. All Rights Reserved.</div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="versions">Powered by <ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore/app_news.php">earthli News 3.7</a></li><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore" title="">earthli WebCore&trade; 3.7</a></li></ul></div></div>    </div>
      </div>
  </div>  </body>
</html>
]]>
  </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
      <title type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[Reaper Man: A Novel of Discworld by Terry Pratchett (1991) (read in 2019)]]>
  </title>
    <id>https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3752</id>
    <link href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3752"/>
    <updated>2019-07-27T22:21:49+02:00</updated>
    <author>
        <name type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[Marco von Ballmoos]]>
  </name>
      <uri>https://earthli.com/users/marco</uri>
    </author>
      <summary type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<blockquote class="quote abstract "><div>Disclaimer: these are notes I took while reading this book. They include citations I found interesting or enlightening or particularly well-written. In some cases, I&rsquo;ve pointed out which of these applies to which citation; in others, I have not. Any benefit you gain from reading these notes is... [<a class="complete-text-link" href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3752">More</a>]</div></blockquote>]]>
  </summary>
      <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<html lang="en">
  <head>
    <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/themes/ice.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/fonts/raleway.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/core/medium.css">
  </head>
  <body>
<div class="style-controls">  <div class="page">
    <div class="page-body">
<div class="info-box-top">
<p>
Published by <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_user.php?name=marco" title="Marco von Ballmoos" class="visible">marco</a> on <span class="date-time">27. Jul 2019 22:21:49 (GMT-5)</span>
</p>
</div>
      <div class="text-flow wide">
  <blockquote class="quote abstract "><div>Disclaimer: these are notes I took while reading this book. They include citations I found interesting or enlightening or particularly well-written. In some cases, I&rsquo;ve pointed out which of these applies to which citation; in others, I have not. Any benefit you gain from reading these notes is purely incidental to the purpose they serve of reminding me what I once read. Please see Wikipedia for a summary if I&rsquo;ve failed to provide one sufficient for your purposes. If my notes serve to trigger an interest in this book, then I&rsquo;m happy for you.</div></blockquote><p>This is an early story of one of Pratchett&rsquo;s favorite characters: Death. It&rsquo;s wonderfully written, one of Pratchett&rsquo;s best.</p>
<p>In it, Death takes a vacation. He goes to work on a farm. He has a vacation romance with the proprietress.</p>
<p>The rest of the Discworld must deal with the temporary loss of death. Ghosts pile up. The wizards of Ankh Morporkh University try to get to the bottom of it. Reg Shoe—the zombie—pleas for the rights of the dead gain more weight as the number of the dead threatens to outweigh that of the living.</p>
<p>To fix this problem, humanity envisions a new Death, who comes for the old Death. Their battle is short. The old Death didn&rsquo;t enjoy his job or his power—his stoicism and dedication win out over a lust for power.</p>
<p>Death gets special dispensation for his fling—Mrs. Flitworth—from Azrael, the galaxy-sized cat who was there before the universe and will be there after.</p>
<h2>Citations</h2><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;And this is the room where the future pours into the past via the pinch of the now.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 4</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Alone of all the creatures in the world, trolls believe that all living things go through Time backward. If the past is visible and the future is hidden, they say, then it means you must be facing the wrong way. Everything alive is going through life back to front. And this is a very interesting idea, considering it was invented by a race who spend most of their time hitting one another on the head with rocks.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 26</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Wizards don’t believe in gods in the same way that most people don’t find it necessary to believe in, say, tables. They know they’re there, they know they’re there for a purpose, they’d probably agree that they have a place in a well-organized universe, but they wouldn’t see the point of believing, of going around saying, “O great table, without whom we are as naught.” Anyway, either the gods are there whether you believe or not, or exist only as a function of the belief, so either way you might as well ignore the whole business&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 27</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Something wonderful, if you took the long view, was about to happen. If you took the short or medium view, something horrible was about to happen. It’s like the difference between seeing a beautiful new star in the winter sky and actually being close to the supernova. It’s the difference between the beauty of morning dew on a cobweb and actually being a fly.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 34</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Intellectually, Ridcully maintained his position for two reasons. One was that he never, ever, changed his mind about anything. The other was that it took him several minutes to understand any new idea put to him, and this is a very valuable trait in a leader, because anything anyone is still trying to explain to you after two minutes is probably important and anything they give up after a mere minute or so is almost certainly something they shouldn’t have been bothering you with in the first place.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 37</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;A door burst open and a suit of clothes came out, a pair of shoes dancing along behind it, a hat floating a few inches above the empty collar. Close behind them came a skinny man endeavoring to do with a hastily-snatched flannel what normally it took a whole pair of trousers to achieve.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 82</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;This usually led to a fierce ecclesiastical debate which resulted in Mrs. Cake giving the chief priest what she called “a piece of her mind.” There were so many pieces of Mrs. Cake’s mind left around the city now that it was quite surprising that there was enough left to power Mrs. Cake but, strangely enough, the more pieces of her mind she gave away the more there seemed to be left.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 99</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;It wasn’t even a one horse town. If anyone had a horse, they’d have eaten it. The residents appeared to make a living by stealing one another’s washing.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 107</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;How could they live with it? And yet they did, and even seemed to find enjoyment in it, when surely the only sensible course would be to despair. Amazing. To feel you were a tiny living thing, sandwiched between two cliffs of darkness. How could they stand to be alive?&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 148</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;“What the hell are you doing?” He looked at the blade in his hands as if he was seeing it for the first time. I THOUGHT I WOULD SHARPEN THIS SCYTHE, MISS FLITWORTH. “At one o’clock in the morning?” He looked at it blankly. IT’S JUST AS BLUNT AT NIGHT, MISS FLITWORTH. Then he slammed it down on the anvil.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 169</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The new daylight sloshed onto the world. Discworld light is old, slow and heavy; it roared across the landscape like a cavalry charge. The occasional valley slowed it for a moment and, here and there, a mountain range banked it up until it poured over the top and down the far slope. It moved across a sea, surged up the beach and accelerated over the plains, driven by the lash of the sun. On the fabled hidden continent of Xxxx, somewhere near the rim, there is a lost colony of wizards who wear corks around their pointy hats and live on nothing but prawns. There, the light is still wild and fresh as it rolls in from space, and they surf on the boiling interface between night and day. If one of them had been carried thousands of miles inland on the dawn, he might have seen, as the light thundered over the high plains, a stick figure toiling up a low hill in the path of the morning.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 175</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;He looked proudly at the Combination Harvester. Of course, you needed a horse to pull it. That spoiled things a bit. Horses belonged to Yesterday; Tomorrow belonged to the Combination Harvester and its descendants, which would make the world a cleaner and better place. It was just a matter of taking the horse out of the equation. He’d tried clockwork, and that wasn’t powerful enough. Maybe if he tried winding a— Behind him, the kettle boiled over and put the fire out. Simnel fought his way through the steam. That was the bloody trouble, every time. Whenever someone was trying to do a bit of sensible thinking, there was always some pointless distraction.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 206</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;I’VE NEVER BEEN VERY SURE ABOUT WHAT IS RIGHT, said Bill Door. I AM NOT SURE THERE IS SUCH A THING AS RIGHT. OR WRONG. JUST PLACES TO STAND. “No, right’s right and wrong’s wrong,” said Miss Flitworth. “I was brought up to tell the difference.” BY A CONTRABANDISTOR. “A what?” A MOVER OF CONTRABAND. “There’s nothing wrong with smuggling!” I MERELY POINT OUT THAT SOME PEOPLE THINK OTHERWISE. “They don’t count!”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 230</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Vermine are small black-and-white rodents found in the Ramtop Mountains. They are ancestors of the lemming, which as is well known throws itself over cliffs and drowns in lakes on a regular basis. Vermine used to do that, too. The point is, though, that dead animals don’t breed, and over the millennia more and more vermine were descendants of those vermine who, when faced with a cliff edge, squeaked the rodent equivalent of Blow that for a Game of Soldiers. Vermine now abseil down cliffs, and build small boats to cross lakes. When their rush leads them to the seashore they sit around avoiding one another’s gaze for a while, and then leave early to get home before the rush.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 344</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Something about the relentless movement, the way they crushed one another in their surge, suggested that the wire baskets had as much choice in the matter as water has about flowing downhill.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 236</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;“Why are you called One—” is that all? I thought you could work that one out, a clever man like you. in my tribe we’re traditionally named after the first thing the mother sees when she looks out of the teepee after the birth. it’s short for One-Man-Pouring-a-Bucket-of-Water-over-Two-Dogs. “That’s pretty unfortunate,” said Windle. it’s not too bad, said One-Man-Bucket. it was my twin brother you had to feel sorry for. she looked out ten seconds before me to give him his name. Windle Poons thought about it. “Don’t tell me, let me guess,” he said. “Two-Dogs-Fighting?” Two-Dogs-Fighting? Two-Dogs Fighting? said One-Man-Bucket. wow, he’d have given his right arm to be called Two-Dogs-Fighting.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 307</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;In the Ramtop village where they dance the real Morris dance, for example, they believe that no one is finally dead until the ripples they cause in the world die away—until the clock he wound up winds down, until the wine she made has finished its ferment, until the crop they planted is harvested. The span of someone’s life, they say, is only the core of their actual existence.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 308</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Light thinks it travels faster than anything but it is wrong. No matter how fast light travels it finds the darkness has always got there first, and is waiting for it.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 311</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;And then, below, a plain. Distance was as meaningless here as time, but there was a sense of hugeness. The plain could have been a mile away, or a million miles; it was marked by long valleys or rills which flowed away to either side as he got closer.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 312</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The furrowed landscape falls away into immense distances, curves at the edges, becomes a fingertip. Azrael raised his finger to a face that filled the sky, lit by the faint glow of dying galaxies. There are a billion Deaths, but they are all aspects of the one Death: Azrael, the Great Attractor, the Death of Universes, the beginning and end of time. Most of the universe is made up of dark matter, and only Azrael knows who it is. Eyes so big that a supernova would be a mere suggestion of a gleam on the iris turned slowly and focused on the tiny figure on the immense whorled plains of his fingertips. Beside Azrael the big Clock hung in the center of the entire web of the dimensions, and ticked onward. Stars glittered in Azrael’s eyes.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 312</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;WILL YOU GRANT ME JUST A LITTLE TIME? FOR THE PROPER BALANCE OF THINGS. TO RETURN WHAT WAS GIVEN. FOR THE SAKE OF PRISONERS AND THE FLIGHT OF BIRDS.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 313</div></div><p>This is in reference to the mercy and hope offered by death. See <a href="https://sevencircumstances.com/books-by-genre/reaper-man-by-terry-pratchett/">Goodbye, Terry Pratchett</a> (<cite><a href="http://sevencircumstances.com/">Seven Circumstances</a></cite>)</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Pratchett writes that everything living needs Death for the sake of mercy, the same mercy that prisoners experience when they see, through the windows of their cells, birds in flight. Mercy, but also longing and hope, since they look at the birds and think that one day they too might be free.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>Apparently, this is one of the most oft-quoted passages from Pratchett&rsquo;s opus.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Somewhere in the night, Reg Shoe looked both ways, took a furtive paintbrush and small pot of paint from inside his jacket, and painted on a handy wall: Inside Every Living Person is a Dead Person Waiting to Get Out . . . And then it was all over. The end.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 340</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Death stood alone, watching the wheat dance in the wind. Of course, it was only a metaphor. People were more than corn. They whirled through tiny crowded lives, driven literally by clock work, filling their days from edge to edge with the sheer effort of living. And all lives were exactly the same length. Even the very long and very short ones. From the point of view of eternity, anyway.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 341</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;And at the end of all stories Azrael, who knew the secret, thought: I REMEMBER WHEN ALL THIS WILL BE AGAIN.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 343</div></div>      </div>
      </div>
        <div class="footer">
    <div class="footer-data"><div class="footer-links"><ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/contact.php" title="">Contact</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/support.php" title="">Support</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/privacy.php" title="">Privacy</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/rights.php" title="">Rights</a></li></ul></div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="copyright">Copyright (c) 1999-2026 earthli.com. All Rights Reserved.</div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="versions">Powered by <ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore/app_news.php">earthli News 3.7</a></li><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore" title="">earthli WebCore&trade; 3.7</a></li></ul></div></div>    </div>
      </div>
  </div>  </body>
</html>
]]>
  </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
      <title type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[Summa Technologiae (Electronic Mediations) by Stanisław Lem (1966; en: 2013) (read in 2019)]]>
  </title>
    <id>https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3750</id>
    <link href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3750"/>
    <updated>2019-07-27T21:21:17+02:00</updated>
    <author>
        <name type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[Marco von Ballmoos]]>
  </name>
      <uri>https://earthli.com/users/marco</uri>
    </author>
      <summary type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<blockquote class="quote abstract "><div>Disclaimer: these are notes I took while reading this book. They include citations I found interesting or enlightening or particularly well-written. In some cases, I’ve pointed out which of these applies to which citation; in others, I have not. Any benefit you gain from reading these notes is... [<a class="complete-text-link" href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3750">More</a>]</div></blockquote>]]>
  </summary>
      <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<html lang="en">
  <head>
    <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/themes/ice.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/fonts/raleway.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/core/medium.css">
  </head>
  <body>
<div class="style-controls">  <div class="page">
    <div class="page-body">
<div class="info-box-top">
<p>
Published by <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_user.php?name=marco" title="Marco von Ballmoos" class="visible">marco</a> on <span class="date-time">27. Jul 2019 21:21:17 (GMT-5)</span>
</p>
<p>
Updated by <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_user.php?name=marco" title="Marco von Ballmoos" class="visible">marco</a> on <span class="date-time">28. Sep 2023 10:11:31 (GMT-5)</span>
</p>
</div>
      <div class="text-flow wide">
  <blockquote class="quote abstract "><div>Disclaimer: these are notes I took while reading this book. They include citations I found interesting or enlightening or particularly well-written. In some cases, I’ve pointed out which of these applies to which citation; in others, I have not. Any benefit you gain from reading these notes is purely incidental to the purpose they serve of reminding me what I once read. Please see Wikipedia for a summary if I’ve failed to provide one sufficient for your purposes. If my notes serve to trigger an interest in this book, then I’m happy for you.</div></blockquote><p>This is a non-fiction work translated from the original Polish. It is not a light work: it encompasses Lem&rsquo;s complex and intricate musings and theories on technology, nature, genetics, cosmology, philosophy, biology, information theory, ecology, virtual reality, artificial intelligence, cybernetics, robots, programming, identity (cloning), human nature and how these all relate to mankind&rsquo;s possible future or lack thereof. He discusses the likely shape of galactic civilizations as well as the possible composition or origins of its components, where their intelligence comes from, where it would likely develop, where it wouldn&rsquo;t, why science fiction is lazy and, above all, he keeps the discussion rigorously supported by data, even when he seems to be engaging in the most whimsical flights of fancy.</p>
<p>It&rsquo;s hard to summarize this book any less vaguely than that. It&rsquo;s just chock-full of relatively advanced thinking—especially for the time, over 50 years ago—of an extremely intelligent and, by all accounts, intellectually rigorous man. I&rsquo;ll use some of his own citations to illustrate what I found so exciting in such a weighty and densely written tome (it took me quite a while to make my way through it).</p>
<p>Much of what he has to say has been said in other places, but perhaps less eloquently, and not all in one place, connected into a coherent strand of pearls that actually gives a framework to thoughts about the future of not only humanity, but any form of intelligence, regardless of where or how it arises.</p>
<p>On the pace of development outpacing humanity&rsquo;s societal structures (i.e. the wisdom of elders):</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;When the entire life of a future generation ceases to be a repetition of their parents’ lives, what kinds of lessons and instructions can the old, experienced as they are, offer to the young?&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>On the necessary narrowing of intellectual pursuit, with each decision to take a certain branch leaving less energy and intellectual capacity and effort to pursue other, possibly more societally lucrative, paths.</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Briefly put, technoevolution brings more evil than good, with man turning out to be a prisoner of what he himself has created. The growth of his knowledge is accompanied by the narrowing down of possibilities when it comes to deciding about his own fate.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>There is no avoiding this: there is only improving the odds that the chosen path is fruitful. In this vein, any civilization—humanity definitely included—only has so much energy and intellectual capacity for missteps. The more advanced a civilization, the more likely that it can muster an effort that will be able to appropriate a large amount of the available resources. In this, Lem presages our coming battle with climate change: we don&rsquo;t have unlimited &ldquo;lives&rdquo; to start over (as in a video game). Instead, we must marshal our resources carefully.</p>
<p>The profit motive is an unreliable siren here; in the past, we have expended considerable wasted effort &ldquo;optimizing&rdquo; for the best solution, throwing incredible resources at a problem, only to end up with a good solution, but with very high cost. In this way, we are emulating evolution&rsquo;s inefficient process, copying the only creator we know. But our effort to extract ourselves from the narrowing chasm of climate change will require a more precise investment of resources.</p>
<p>We are unlikely to do so and will die out. Lem wonders whether that is the nearly unavoidable fate of many civilizations: why would humanity, with all of its faults, and its massively redundant but ultimately unreliable biological machinery, be different?</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Are we really supposed to believe that, when looking at the sky above us, we are seeing an abyss filled with worlds that have already been turned to ashes by the power of their suicidal intelligence or that are headed directly toward such an end?&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>How would the main driver of change, evolution, be able to help us avoid such a fate? Humanity&rsquo;s intellect allows it to destroy itself much more quickly than evolution could possibly react.</p>
<p>Because we&rsquo;re smarter than that? Not really. Lem offers a definition of intelligence that is humbling—all the more so because it is frighteningly accurate and utterly devoid of artifice that romanticizes mankind as &ldquo;special&rdquo;.</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;By Intelligence we understand a second-level homeostatic regulator that is capable of coping with disturbances to its environment thanks to the activities in which it engages on the basis of the historically acquired knowledge.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>He is similarly calculating and sober about the purpose of societies. It is hard to find fault with his description, at least at the high level where it truly matters.</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;What to an observer from a different culture may look like a most irrational type of social ties, obligations, imperatives, and prohibitions has practically always aimed at the same goal: reducing the individual spontaneity of action and its diversity—which is a potential source of disturbance to the state of equilibrium.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>In his discussion of artificial—or &ldquo;machine&rdquo; (designed)—intelligence, he offers up an interesting and understandable analogy to describe the &ldquo;gap&rdquo; in intelligence between different levels of beings (instead of trying to pretend that knowledge and wisdom make no difference).</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;In undertaking a reduction, a machine will thus be doing what a physicist is doing when explaining gravitational wave theory to a wide audience by taking recourse to a modest arsenal of school-level math.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>As for how these machines might work, he looks to the most complex machines heretofore designed: us. Evolution may have expended a shamefully wasteful amount of energy and time designing and refining us, but there is no arguing that she came up with a relatively robust machine. That is not to say that there isn&rsquo;t a tremendous amount of room for improvement with a more focused design process, but that the human machine is still more advanced and impressive than anything that man has managed to design and build.</p>
<p>The key is autonomous systems, to focus the intellect on higher-order functions.</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The more complex a system is, the more overall regulation is needed, and the smaller the extent to which local oscillations of parameters can be allowed. Does our brain have regulatory control over our body? Undoubtedly it does. Is every one of us in control of our own body? Only within a narrow range of parameters; the rest is “given” to us by Nature, in all its wisdom.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>He marvels at the machine that Nature has built, but thinks that we can eventually do better. He doesn&rsquo;t disparage Nature, but also does not consider it to be magically unsurpassable.</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;[…] “coded”in the language of chemical molecules, which could develop from this sperm after it has been combined with an egg. This plan apparently consists of “production rules”and “directions for action.”In that microscopic space, there is information about what has to be done, information about how it has to be done, and last but not least, a mechanism that will enact all this.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>He even considers what identity is and how the ability to clone or store or copy or transmit an individual would affect it. It is interesting to see this treatise by someone who doesn&rsquo;t confine himself to just one field, be it philosophy, biology or ethics. Instead, Lem approaches from the coldly rational realm of a cyberneticist with experience and wisdom in all of these fields, arriving at a more acceptable and logical conclusion than any individual familiar with only one of these fields could.</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;A twin is indeed a perfect molecular copy of the “original.”Yet the similarity between two states of the same person—when he is eight and eighty years old, respectively—is no doubt even smaller than the mutual similarity between the twins. Despite this, anyone would admit that the child and the old man are the same person—something we cannot say about the two brothers. It is therefore not the amount of analogous genetic information that determines the continuation of existence but rather the fact of being genetically identical, even if the dynamic structure of the brain undergoes significant changes during one’s lifetime.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>Finally, Lem reassures us that future developments—especially cybernetic or robotic ones—are inevitable if we are to survive. Our past as frail biological shells has served us well to get to where we are, but we will never develop to a galactic and nigh-eternal civilization if we cling to these crude origins. Instead, we should see the intelligence that we have as enough of a lever to bootstrap ourselves into the next level.</p>
<p>Even if our biological shells can&rsquo;t go along, our progeny will. We will either have to adapt or die. That includes modifying our genotype to &ldquo;improve&rdquo; it—which entails making moral judgments about what it means to improve something (i.e. value judgments about which humans are worth promoting). So has it always been and so will it always be. Avoiding these decisions because of a temporary luxury to do so will be fatal. We can obstinately refuse and instead elect to die out.</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;We have to admit that the extent to which control will remain in human hands partly depends on a point of view. The fact that man is able to swim by himself does not mean that he is capable of crossing an ocean without a ship—not to mention jets and space rockets in this context! A similar evolution is starting, in a kind of parallel way, in the information universe. Man is capable of directing a gnostic machine toward a problem that he could perhaps solve by himself (either he himself or his great grandchildren), but in the process, the machine may open his eyes to a problem whose existence he did not even suspect. Who actually has the lead in the latter example?&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>To this end, we will need to accept that certain passengers will not be able to make the trip. That all people are equal is something that we proudly wave about as if Nature cares at all.</p>
<p>This current period, with its anti-evolutionary attitude, near love, of the evolutionarily disadvantaged, will be seen as a backwards religious curiosity in the future. At best. At worst, they will perceive us as criminally pushing for the end of humanity.</p>
<p>A hundred years from now (or less), when nature is drastically outpacing evolution’s ability to adapt, man will no longer have the luxury of hewing to a moral code that forbids genetic engineering of humans.</p>
<p>The blind, the deaf, the unmotivated, the stupid, the weak, the retarded, the severely autistic—anyone who needs the intricate modern support system to survive [1]—they will sink when their survival depends on them swimming. Being saddled with them because of an outdated morality will be a luxury no-one will be able to afford.</p>
<p>It will be seen as far more efficient to tweak genetics to keep members of society within a physical bandwidth that if not of actual use in one way or another, at least imposes a minimum of effort.</p>
<p>We will no longer have the luxury of keeping useless people alive. This is not eugenics; this is a much harsher world than we know. The future will contain a desperation unknown for centuries to the first-world person. Third-world people—¾ of the world—are already intimately familiar with this harsh, cruel algebra.</p>
<p>In Lem&rsquo;s words:</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;If we are to behave like intellectual cowards, we can, of course, remain silent on the topic of any probable future developments. But in that case, we should at least make it clear that we are behaving like cowards. Man cannot change the world without changing himself. We can take the first steps on a given path while pretending we do not know where it leads. Yet this is not the best strategy.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>Lem is capable of describing procreation in the most clinical possible way:</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Fertilization is an act of “taking a molecular decision” in a confrontation between two partly alternative “hypotheses” about a future state of the organism, whereby the gametes of both sexes are “carriers” of those hypotheses.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>He tries again and again to describe just how limited we are relative to our future selves.</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;For someone who can count to a hundred, there is actually no practical difference between a quintillion and infinity. Man as a researcher of the Universe is more like someone who has just learned arithmetic than like a mathematician who is freely juggling infinities.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>He also wonders what we&rsquo;re going to do with ourselves if we do make it past the coming inflection point that will determine whether we have a future.</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;[…] when basic needs are being fully satisfied, the problem “what to do next,” i.e., whether we should create some new needs and, if so, what kind, comes to the fore.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>Finally, just to show that Lem&rsquo;s sometimes too optimistic, we need only turn to his hope for how we will manage information overload.</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;We can even think that presenting banal works will at last be declared a menace and thus will be seen as a violation of scientists’ professional ethics because such works create nothing but “noise” that prevents us from receiving valuable information.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>Oh dear, thank goodness Lem is no longer around to see just how badly we&rsquo;ve disappointed him.</p>
<p>It is not an easy read, but it is legitimately a work of staggering genius. You don&rsquo;t have to agree with him on everything, but you can&rsquo;t argue with his method, with his intellectual rigor and devotion to the scientific method to reduce the ineffability of who we are and where we&rsquo;re headed.</p>
<p><hr></p>
<div class="footnote-reference"><span id="footnote_DRAFTABLE_ENTRY_3750_1_body" class="footnote-number">[1]</span> This might be all of us, at this point, to be honest.</div><h2>Citations</h2><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;We are going to speak of the future. Yet isn’t discoursing about future events a rather inappropriate occupation for those who are lost in the transience of the here and now? Indeed, to seek out our great-great-grandsons’ problems when we cannot really cope with the overload generated by our own looks like a scholasticism of the most ridiculous kind.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">373-375</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;is therefore somewhat out of necessity that technologies are of interest to me, since a given civilization embraces everything society has desired, but also everything else that has not been part of anyone’s plan.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">395-396</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;When the entire life of a future generation ceases to be a repetition of their parents’ lives, what kinds of lessons and instructions can the old, experienced as they are, offer to the young?&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">432-433</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;In the way one used to ascribe the motivations and psychological traits of contemporary monarchs to the pharaohs, one represents today the corsairs and pirates of the thirtieth century. We can surely amuse ourselves like this, provided we remember we are only playing.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">469-471</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Who will gain the upper hand, a strategic space for civilization’s maneuvers: humanity, which is freely choosing from the widely available arsenal of technological means, or maybe technology, which, through automation, will successfully conclude the process of removing humans from its territory?&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">531-533</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;it is usually impossible to detect to what extent a given shape has been determined by the designer’s supply and to what extent by the buyer’s demand. We are faced here with circular processes in which causes become effects and effects causes and in which numerous instances of positive and negative feedback are at work: living organisms in biology or subsequent industrial products in the technical civilization are only tiny elements of these higher processes.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">651-654</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;This is why we should not overestimate the “wisdom”of biological evolution, since it often led whole species down a developmental blind alley. It tended to repeat not just beneficial solutions but, equally often, erroneous ones that would lead to a decline. Evolution’s knowledge is empirical and short term. Its apparent perfection is a consequence of the long stretches of space and time it has traversed.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">831-834</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The last problem we have to deal with concerns the moral aspects of technoevolution. Its productivity has already attracted severe criticism since it is widening the gap between the two main spheres of our activity: the regulation of Nature and the regulation of Humanity. From this point of view, atomic energy found itself in human hands prematurely. Man’s first step into space was also premature, especially since already in the early days of astronautics, it demanded great resources, thus depleting the already unfair distribution of the Earth’s global income.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">839-842</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Briefly put, technoevolution brings more evil than good, with man turning out to be a prisoner of what he himself has created. The growth of his knowledge is accompanied by the narrowing down of possibilities when it comes to deciding about his own fate.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">849-851</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Today the whole world is adopting the developmental model of the West. Technology is being imported by nations that can be proud of having more ancient and more complex cultures than those that gave rise to this technology. This raises a fascinating question: what would have happened if the West had not undertaken a technological revolution, if it had not mobilized its Galileos, Newtons, and Stephensons toward the Industrial Revolution?&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">903-906</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;This model is beautiful thanks to its methodological simplicity. It explains why singular discoveries, even if they are significant, can become suspended in a vacuum when it comes to their technogenerative social effects—as was the case with the powder metallurgy of the Indians or the gunpowder of the Chinese. Subsequent links that were needed to start a chain reaction were not there.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">951-953</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The anthropologist, fascinated as he is with myriads of those inner dependencies among various civilizations, needs to be replaced by the sociologist–cyberneticist. Consciously ignoring the inner cultural and semantic meanings of all such practices, the latter will examine their structures as if they constituted a feedback system that aims at an ultrastable equilibrium, and whose dynamic task lies in regulation aimed at ensuring the perpetuation of this equilibrium.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">980-983</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Yet cannot a civilization gain the freedom of choice with regard to its future path the way an individual can? But what conditions would need to be fulfilled for this freedom to take place? Society must become independent from the technologies of elementary problems. Basic issues that each civilization has to deal with—food, clothing, transportation, but also the initiation of life, the distribution of goods, the protection of health and property—have to disappear. They have to become invisible, like air—the abundance of which has so far been the only excess in human history.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">1010-1014</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Are people supposed to say at some point, “Enough! We will not be automatizing such and such areas of work anymore, even though we can; we shall stop Technology to save man’s labor so that he does not feel redundant? This would be a peculiar kind of freedom and a peculiar way of using it, after centuries of fighting for it.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">1034-1036</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;We shall not gain the first type of freedom because what seemed like freedom yesterday is not the same anymore today. The state of having been liberated from the compulsion to undertake actions that have to satisfy elementary needs will allow us to select a further option, but this will not be a unique historical event. The situation of choice will be repeated at the higher levels we subsequently reach.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">1038-1041</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The answer we would get, based on our observation of outer space, would make the majority of our current speculative analyses entirely futile. A Robinson who would be able to communicate with other intelligent beings, or at least observe their activity from afar, would not have to suffer the uncertainty of complicated guesswork anymore. Naturally, there is something dangerous about such a situation. Any too explicit and too definite answers would show us that we are slaves to developmental determinism rather than creatures exposed to ever greater freedom—which stands for an unlimited freedom of choice.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">1090-1094</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Are we really supposed to believe that, when looking at the sky above us, we are seeing an abyss filled with worlds that have already been turned to ashes by the power of their suicidal intelligence or that are headed directly toward such an end?&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">1230-1231</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The scientist, searching for signs of astroengineering activity in the Universe, may have actually been seeing it for a while, yet he is banned from classifying it as a separate phenomenon, that is, from isolating it from the natural world and ascribing its genesis to the Intellect, by the very science to which he is in service. Is there no way out of this dilemma? Can we not imagine some “clear-cut miracles”that cannot be explained in a nontechnological way?&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">1344-1347</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;It makes one wonder how evolution, which is so “economical”in every area of information transfer, produced the human brain—a device with such a high degree of “excess.”This brain—which, even today, in the twentieth century, copes very well with the problems of a large civilization—is anatomically and biologically identical with the brain of our primitive, “barbarian”ancestor from a hundred thousand years ago. In what way did this massive “potential of intelligence,”this excessiveness which, from the early days, seemed geared to build a civilization, emerge in the course of the probabilistic evolutionary game between two vectors: mutation pressure and selection pressure? Evolutionism lacks a firm answer to this question.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">1470-1475</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;By Intelligence we understand a second-level homeostatic regulator that is capable of coping with disturbances to its environment thanks to the activities in which it engages on the basis of the historically acquired knowledge.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">1607-1608</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Human intelligence has led us to the Technological Era because the terrestrial environment has a number of unique characteristics. Would the Industrial Revolution have been possible if it had not been for the Carboniferous, a geological period during which the reserves of solar energy had been stored in the sunk forests that were undergoing carbonization? Would it have been possible if not for the oil reserves, which emerged in the course of some other transformations?&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">1608-1612</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The issue here is that the more precisely the transmitted message uses the capacity of the information channel (i.e., the higher the reduction of the excess of this transmission), the more it starts to resemble noise. In this situation, the receiver—who does not know the coding system—would actually have tremendous difficulties not just with deciphering the information he receives but also with recognizing it precisely as information, as opposed to cosmic background noise. We cannot thus exclude the possibility that already today, we are receiving, as noise, via our radio telescopes, fragments of “interstellar conversations”conducted by “supercivilizations.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">1705-1709</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The explosion phase is therefore only a stage in the history of civilization. Is it the only one? What will a “post-explosion”civilization look like? Will the omnidirectional nature of Intelligence—something we have considered its permanent trait—have to give way to a bunch of selective activities? We shall look for an answer to this question too, yet what we have discussed so far already throws some interesting light onto the problem of stellar psychozoics. Exponential growth can serve as a dynamic law of a civilization over thousands of years—but not over millions of years.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">1822-1826</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;If coal and oil deposits had run out, say, at the end of the nineteenth century, we would have been highly unlikely to have produced atom technology in the middle of the twentieth century because enormous powers were needed to make it happen. Those powers were initially installed in laboratories, after which they became available on an industrial scale. And yet humanity is still not ready to switch to an exclusive use of “heavy”atomic energy (i.e., energy derived from the decomposition of heavy nuclei). Given the current increase in power use, this would result in “burning up”all the deposits of uranium and its cognate elements within a few centuries. The exploitation of energy from nuclear synthesis (of hydrogen into helium) has not been accomplished yet. The difficulties have turned out to be more substantial than expected. All this means that, first, a civilization should have considerable reserves of energy at its disposal to have enough time to obtain the information that will provide access to some new energy sources, and second, that a civilization must consider the primacy of this model of information acquisition over any other.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">1848-1856</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Producing such “encystment”will involve having to construct “a world within a world,”an autonomous reality that is not directly connected with the material reality of Nature. The emergent “cybernetic–sociotechnical”shell will enclose the civilization under discussion within itself. The latter will continue to exist and grow, but in a way that is not visible to an external observer anymore (especially one in outer space).&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">1937-1940</div></div><p>Like Egan’s digital/virtual archologies.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Does our civilization not show excessive hyperspecialization, even though it has not yet reached the “information barrier&rdquo; Does its military potential not resemble the enormous jaws and carapaces of Mesozoic reptiles, whose abilities in many other areas were so limited that they eventually determined their fate?&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">1958-1960</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Perhaps we will eventually gain a kind of longevity that will practically amount to immortality, but to do this, we will have to give up on the bodily form that nature gave us. Perhaps, thanks to hibernation, we will be able to travel freely across millions of years, but those who wake up after their glacial dream will find themselves in an unfamiliar world, since the world and the culture that have shaped them will have disappeared during their reversible death. Thus, when fulfilling our dreams, the material world requires us to undertake actions the realization of which can equally resemble a victory and a defeat.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">2017-2021</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;“We’ve seen a model of a device consisting of eight trillion elements,”we tell an engineer. “This device has its own energy center, locomotive systems, a hierarchy of regulators, and a timing belt that consists of fifteen billion parts. It can perform so many functions that we wouldn’t even be able to list them all during our lifetime. Yet the formula that not only enabled the construction of this device but actually constructed it was fully contained within the cubic capacity of 8/1000 of a millimeter.”The engineer replies that this is impossible. He is wrong, because we were talking about the head of the human spermatozoon, which, as we know, contains all the information that is needed to produce a specimen of the Homo sapiens.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">2029-2035</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Yet, at the same time, our jumper, who of course “carries in his head” all the mathematics connected with the jump, will not be able to write down its theoreticomathematical counterpart, that is, the appropriate scientific formulas and transformations. The reason for this is that, if it is to be conveyed in a way that is traditionally taught in schools and colleges, this kind of “biomathematics&rdquo;—which is practiced by all living organisms, including ciliates—requires a repeated translation of the system-forming impulses from one language to another: from a word-free and “automatic”language of biochemical processes and of the transfer of neuron stimulations to a symbolic language.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">2102-2107</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;By way of a rather useful introduction to the problem of the “black box,”we can recall the story of a centipede who was asked how it was able to remember which leg to raise after it had lifted the eighty-ninth one.5 The centipede, as we know, pondered the question, and not being able to find an answer, died of hunger since it could not move anymore.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">2128-2131</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;It is often said that there exist transhistorical moral pointers. From this point of view, “Tarpeian morality, even in its most benign form (manifested, e.g., in postulating euthanasia for people experiencing agony as a result of incurable diseases), is immoral, criminal, and evil. What happens here is that we evaluate one moral system from the standpoint of another system. It goes without saying that we opt for this other, “non-Tarpeian” system, but if we agree that it emerged over the course of man’s social evolution rather than via an act of revelation, we must take into account the fact that different moral systems are at work in different historical periods.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">2185-2190</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;In the first case, the self-regulation principle of the homeostatic producer will be violated. In the second, homeostats will start to influence human lives in a way that has not been fully envisaged by their creators—which can then lead to an economic collapse in the country as a whole just because one of the homeostats will be performing its set task too well, by bankrupting all its competitors . . .&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">2225-2228</div></div><p>Adorable that the paperclip optimizers think that they invented the idea.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;[…] might seem that dangers of this kind will be nipped in the bud by constructing a “black box”of a higher type, as a kind of “ruling machine&rdquo;—one that would not rule over people but rather over the “black boxes”of individual producers that would be subordinate to it. The discussion of the consequences of this step will prove extremely interesting.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">2241-2243</div></div><p>Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Perhaps it will announce that there is a contradiction between the axioms that are being introduced by means of the Operating Program (e.g., one cannot conduct an economically viable program of the automation of production and simultaneously aim to reduce unemployment unless one does many other things at the same time, e.g., introduce a state- or capital-supported reskilling program for those who are being made redundant as a result of the automation, etc.). What then?&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">2255-2258</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;the price that had to be paid for increasing the standard of living and decreasing unemployment is a short tail grown by every sixth child or the general lowering of intelligence in society (since more intelligent people cause more problems for the regulatory activity of the machine, which is why it will aim to reduce their number).&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">2310-2312</div></div><p>We took path B.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;In the capitalist system, cooperativeness can blossom, yet this does not stop it from being capitalist. Only the simultaneous change to a series of significant parameters can change not just the economic model but also the systemic model that is superior to it because this is when the totality of social relations will undergo a transformation. However, a distinction needs to be made once again between a regulator of a given system and a regulator that can transform a given system into a different one (should it decide such a change is required).&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">2350-2354</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The homeostasis of a civilization is a product of man’s social evolution. Since times immemorial, all societies through history have practiced regulatory activity aimed at maintaining systemic equilibrium. Of course, people were not aware of the nature of their collective actions, just as they did not realize that their economic and manufacturing activities gave shape and form to political systems. Societies that had the same level of material development and analogous types of economics saw different structures emerge within this domain of postproductive life that we call superstructure.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">2362-2366</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;What to an observer from a different culture may look like a most irrational type of social ties, obligations, imperatives, and prohibitions has practically always aimed at the same goal: reducing the individual spontaneity of action and its diversity—which is a potential source of disturbance to the state of equilibrium.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">2371-2373</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Belief is thus a transient state—until it gets verified empirically. If it becomes too independent from such verification, it is transformed into a metaphysical construct. The peculiarity of such belief stems from the fact that realistic actions are being undertaken to achieve unrealistic goals, that is, goals that either cannot be realized at all or that can be realized but not via the action that is being performed.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">2415-2417</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Belief thus leads to an excessive use of the inductive method because the conclusions drawn by means of induction are either directed toward “the next world”(i.e., an empirical “nowhere&rdquo;) or supposed to establish connections within Nature that do not exist in it (every evening when I start to make scrambled eggs, stars appear in the sky; yet the conclusion that there exists a connection between my preparation of an evening meal and the appearance of stars is a case of false induction, which can become the subject of belief).&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">2424-2428</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The only thing that matters to us is that the previously mentioned states are accompanied by the sensation of experiencing some ultimate truth, which is so intense and overwhelming that, having experienced it, one then looks with contempt or pity at the empiricists, miserably bustling around some trivial worldly matters. Two things thus need to be said. First, the divergence between “experiential truth”and “scientific truth”would perhaps be irrelevant if the first one did not claim some kind of superiority for itself. And if this is the case, then we should point out that the person undergoing the experience would not exist at all if it had not been for such lowly empiricism, which was initiated a long time ago by the Australopithecus and cavemen.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">2452-2457</div></div><p>This describes our current society, though not limited to religion.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;To return to the problem of belief and information, we can now summarize our conclusions. The influence of the information entered into the homeostat depends not so much on whether this information is objectively false or true but rather, on one hand, on how predisposed the homeostat is to consider it true and, on the other, on whether the regulatory characteristics of the homeostat allow it to react in response to the information entered. To make it work, both postulates need to be fulfilled. Belief can heal me, yet it will not make me fly. It is because the first activity lies within the regulatory realm of my organism (although not always within the realm of my conscious will), the second one outside it.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">2503-2509</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The conviction that Western civilization, with its standards set by mass culture and the ongoing mechanical facilitation of life, annihilates these potential spiritual riches—the cultivation of which should be at the core of our existence—regularly leads various people, among them even Western scientists at times, to turn to ancient Asia, especially India, in the hope that Buddhism will offer a panacea for the spiritual dry rot of technocracy. This is an extremely mistaken view. Individuals may become “saved”in this way, while those who are looking for consolation can apparently find it in Buddhist monasteries, yet this is pure escapism, an act of running away or even of intellectual desertion. No religion can do anything for humanity because it is not an empirical knowledge. It does reduce the “existential pain”of individuals, but at the same time, it increases the sum total of the calamities affecting whole populations precisely owing to its helplessness and idleness in the face of social problems. It cannot thus be defended as a useful tool even from a pragmatic point of view because it is a wrong kind of tool, one that remains helpless in the face of the fundamental problems of the world.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">2614-2622</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;We are faced here with an interesting problem: when exactly did consciousness arise in the machine? Let us say the designer was not adjusting those machines but rather took each one to a museum and then built a new model from scratch. There are ten thousand machines in the museum as this is how many subsequent models had been made. It is in fact a fluid transition from a “soulless machine”such as a jukebox to a “thinking machine.”Should we consider machine no. 7852 as conscious, or only machine no. 9973? The difference between them is that the first one was unable to explain why it was laughing at the joke it had just heard but could only say that it was funny, whereas the second one was able to provide such an explanation. Yet some people laugh at jokes even though they are unable to explain what is funny about them, because, as we know, a theory of humor is a hard nut to crack. Does this mean that those people also lack consciousness? Not at all; they are probably not very bright, not that intelligent, their brain is not trained in thinking analytically about problems, yet we are not asking whether a machine is bright or somewhat stupid, only whether it has consciousness.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">2785-2794</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;We should add that there is terminological confusion, or conceptual lack of clarity, in the literature on the subject because some refer to a “heuristic behavior”as “nonalgorithmic,”yet such a conclusion depends on whether we consider an algorithm to be an ultimately determined instruction that does not change in the course of its realization or an instruction that, thanks to the feedback that is restructuring it, in the course of its action “itself”becomes transformed into a form different from its original one.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">3008-3012</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;In undertaking a reduction, a machine will thus be doing what a physicist is doing when explaining gravitational wave theory to a wide audience by taking recourse to a modest arsenal of school-level math.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">3075-3077</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The situation is as follows: either electronic coordinators are incapable of considering a higher number of variables than man is, which means that there is no point in building them, or they are capable of doing it, which means that man himself cannot “find his way”among all the results; that is, he cannot make a decision independently from a machine by only relying on “his own opinion about the situation.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">3125-3128</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;To understand how a complex machine functions, we should consider that the reason we move, walk, talk, and are generally alive is because, during every millisecond, masses of blood cells are running in file, in billions of our body parts at the same time, carrying tiny amounts of oxygen that control the continuous Brownian motion of particles heading toward an anarchic thermostatic chaos. The number of such processes that have to be constantly kept within a very narrow range of parameters is enormous—if that were not the case, then the system’s dynamics would start to fall apart immediately. The more complex a system is, the more overall regulation is needed, and the smaller the extent to which local oscillations of parameters can be allowed. Does our brain have regulatory control over our body? Undoubtedly it does. Is every one of us in control of our own body? Only within a narrow range of parameters; the rest is “given”to us by Nature, in all its wisdom.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">3141-3148</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;A medieval city only needed water and food: a modern one turns into a nightmare when it runs out of electricity—the way it happened in Manhattan a few years ago, when the elevators in buildings and subway trains came to a halt. It is because homeostasis has two sides: it is an increase in insensitivity to an external perturbation, that is, one caused by a “natural”disturbance, and it is also an increase in sensitivity to an inner perturbation, that is, one caused by a disturbance within the system (organism) itself. The higher the artificiality of its environment, the more we are condemned to technology, to its working—and to its failure, if it should fail.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">3153-3157</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;We are not thus faced with an “electronic God”or a godlike ruler but only with systems that, initially called on solely to watch selected processes, as well as processes of exceptional significance or complication, are slowly, in the course of their own evolution, taking control of practically the whole of social dynamics. Those systems will not be trying to “dominate over humanity”in any anthropomorphic sense because, not being human, they will not manifest any signs of egoism or a desire for power—which obviously can only be meaningfully ascribed to “persons.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">3191-3194</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Mathematicians know very well that they do not know what they are doing. A very competent person, Bertrand Russell himself, said that “mathematics may be defined as the subject in which we never know what we are talking about, nor whether what we are saying is true.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 3539</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Since the sixteenth century, physicists have been searching through the warehouses of “empty clothes”created by mathematics. Matrix calculus was an “empty structure”until Heisenberg found a “piece of the world”that matched that empty structure. Physics is full of such examples.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 3560</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The question as to where length “can be found”within an atom’s nucleus is similar to the question as to where the mountain “can be found”when the image is being looked at through a microscope. The image is true as a whole, just as a theory (e.g., quantum theory) that will allow us to predict better the emergence of baryons and leptons, and that will tell us which particles are possible and which are not, will be true as a whole.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 3598</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;A painter paints pictures, yet, even though he has a mouth and we can talk to him, we are not going to find out how he does it. He does not know himself what is going on in his brain when he is painting. The information is contained in his head, but it is inaccessible. In modeling, one has to simplify: a machine that is capable of painting a very poor picture will tell us more about the material, that is, cerebral, foundations of painting than the “perfect model”of the artist—his twin brother—would. Modeling practice involves selecting certain variables and ignoring others.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 3669</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;If we thus wanted to model any phenomenon by taking into account all of its variables (assuming for a moment that this would be possible), we would have to construct a system that would be more extensive than the original one, as it would be equipped with additional variables that are characteristic of the modeling system itself but that the original one lacks.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 3694</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Yet maybe it is only today that we need theories and models of phenomena? Maybe, on being asked such a question, a wise man from another planet would silently hand out a piece of an old shoe sole picked up from the ground to us, communicating in this way that the whole truth of the Universe can be read from this piece of matter?&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 3732</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Does Matter by any chance not have all of its potential transformations “inscribed”in it (i.e., the possibility of constructing stars, quantoplanes, sewing machines, roses, silkworms, and comets)? Then, taking the basic building block of Nature, the hydrogen atom, we could “deduce”all those possibilities from it (modestly starting from the possibility of synthesizing a hundred elements all the way through to the possibility of constructing systems that are a trillion times more spiritual than man). We could also deduce all that is unrealizable from it (sweet kitchen salt NaCl, stars whose diameter equals a quadrillion of miles, etc.). From this perspective, matter already entails as its foundational assumptions all those possibilities as well as impossibilities (or prohibitions); we are just unable to crack its “code.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 3738</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;And now for a rather less crude example. The Penicillium notatum mold creates penicillin. Instead of growing mold and extracting the necessary bodies from it, we can take some simple substances and synthesize penicillin from them.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 3757</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Finally, let us now consider an example that is absolutely unrealizable at the moment. In a section of a sperm’s head—in the volume of three thousandths of a millimeter—we can find a design plan for a human brain, “coded”in the language of chemical molecules, which could develop from this sperm after it has been combined with an egg. This plan apparently consists of “production rules”and “directions for action.”In that microscopic space, there is information about what has to be done, information about how it has to be done, and last but not least, a mechanism that will enact all this.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 3764</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Yet the principle remains the same: we have a person connected to the environment, imitated by the phantomatic machine via two information channels, an afferent and efferent one. In this case, the machine can do everything except one thing: it does not directly command the brain processes of the receiver; it only commands the facts that enter the brain,&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 3997</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;We shall thus determine as much: the statement that person × finds himself in the real world rather than in a phantomatic one can always be only probable, sometimes highly probable, but never absolutely certain. Playing against a machine is like playing chess: a contemporary electronic machine will lose to an excellent player, but it will beat a mediocre one; in the future, it will beat every human being.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 4077</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Of course, it is possible to envisage some kind of omniplanetary “Superphantomat,”to which the inhabitants of a given planet have been connected “for ever,”that is, for as long as they have been alive, while their bodies’ vegetative processes are being supported by automatic devices (e.g., those introducing supplements into their blood). Naturally, a civilization of this kind looks like a nightmare. Yet similar criteria cannot determine its probability: something else determines it. This civilization would only exist for the duration of one generation—the one that remains connected to the “Superphantomat.”This would thus be a peculiar form of euthanasia, a kind of pleasant suicide of a civilization. For this reason, we consider its implementation to be impossible.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 4091</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;In other words, cannot phantomatics absorb the dark forces lurking in man, without doing any harm to anyone?&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 4175</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Thus the inauthenticity of phantomatic experiences would take away their “buffer”value; they would instead become a school or a training ground for socially banned activities rather than their “absorber.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 4179</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Illegal phantomats can also, of course, be set up. Yet this is more a policing problem than a cybernetic one. Cyberneticists might be expected to build a kind of “censorship”into the device (akin to the Freudian “dream censor&rdquo;), which would stop the vision as soon as the phantomatized person starts showing some aggressive or sadistic tendencies.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 4186</div></div><p>This is kind of a simplistic take on the subject of virtual reality. I’m surprised he so quickly concludes that it can just be regulated. Still, I have the benefit of five extra decades of thinking about this topic; he was one of the first to even consider it.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;When the transformation of personality can be actualized, individual identity stops being a phenomenon to be investigated and becomes a phenomenon to be defined.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 4444</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;What will happen if we send an “atomic description”not once but twice? Two identical persons will come out of the receiving device. And if we do not just wire this information in one direction but emit it as a radio wave, while the receivers will be located in thousands of places all over the globe and on the surface of numerous planets and moons, the “transmitted”person will appear in all these places. Even though we have transmitted Mr. Smith’s description only once, he is now emerging from the cabins of the receiving devices a million times over—on Earth and in the sky, in cities, on mountaintops, in jungles and moon craters. This only seems strange until we ask where exactly Mr. Smith finds himself at this point. Where has the telegraphic journey taken him?&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 4466</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The murderous aspect of this act seems self-evident, since, if we want to telegraph a person, it is clearly not enough to transmit his atomic description, as this person also has to be killed.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 4539</div></div><p>This presages the main plot of the film The Prestige</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Which one of the two Mr. Smiths is thus a true continuation of the frozen one: the first or the second? Each carries approximately a half of the “original”atoms—which is actually not that relevant, since atoms lack individuality and get exchanged by an organism in metabolic processes.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 4601</div></div><p>Ship of Theseus</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;A twin is indeed a perfect molecular copy of the “original.”Yet the similarity between two states of the same person—when he is eight and eighty years old, respectively—is no doubt even smaller than the mutual similarity between the twins. Despite this, anyone would admit that the child and the old man are the same person—something we cannot say about the two brothers. It is therefore not the amount of analogous genetic information that determines the continuation of existence but rather the fact of being genetically identical, even if the dynamic structure of the brain undergoes significant changes during one’s lifetime.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 4683</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The world today has other concerns. It is divided; it does not satisfy the needs of millions—but what if those needs are eventually satisfied? What if the automatic production of goods takes off? Will the West survive this? This is a grotesque vision: of humanless factories producing billions of objects, machines, nutritional elements, through the energy of a star to which our civilization is “connected.”Will some kind of General Apocalyptics become the owner of that star? Never mind property rights. If I say that one era is coming to an end, I am not even thinking about the demise of the old systems. Satisfying the basic needs of humanity is a necessary task, a preparation for a final exam; it is the beginning of a mature age rather than its end.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 4704</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Indeed, if Nature had had to consider on a regulatory level the momentum, spin, and moment of every separate electron, it would have never constructed any living organisms.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 4748</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Theories are possible because the number of variables in a single phenomenon is incomparably higher than the number of variables this phenomenon shares with a whole lot of other phenomena, whereby it is fine to ignore the former on scientific grounds. This is why it is possible to ignore the history of individual molecules, the fact that Mr. Smith met his aunt the day before, or a million other variables.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 4782</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;This problem belongs to so-called Gestalt psychology. I am not able to describe a friend of mine so that you can immediately recognize him on the basis of my description. Yet I am myself able to recognize him right away. From the perspective of the psychology of sensory perceptions, his face thus represents a certain “Gestalt form.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 4858</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;A melody retains its “form”no matter if it has been whistled through one’s fingers, played by a brass band, or tapped out with one finger on the piano’s keyboard. Everyone can experience such ways of recognizing the “form”of shapes, sounds, and so on. If he is any good, a theoretical scientist well versed in the abstract formalism and symbolism of the theories among which he spends his life starts to perceive those theories as certain “forms.”Naturally, such forms are devoid of any faces, features, or sounds; they are just abstract constructs in his mind. Yet he can manage to discover a similarity between the “forms”of two thus far disconnected theories, or, by aligning them together, he can grasp that they are special cases of a yet nonexistent generalization that needs to be constructed.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 4863</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;All theories use a small number of variables. Theories that are more universal do not contain a great number of variables: they are just applicable in a large number of cases. Relativity theory is a good example of this.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 4962</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;During its course of development, genotypic information is transformed into phenotypic information. A phenotype is the final shape of a system (i.e., its morphological traits, together with physiological ones, and thus its functions) that emerges as a result of the activity of hereditary (genotypic) factors and the influences of an external environment.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 5020</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;we could also understand a mutation as both a decrease in the amount of (structural) information and an increase in the amount of (selective) information. The way a mutation is “perceived”is determined by the biogeocenotic environment. Under normal conditions, it will stand for a decrease in the amount of structural information pertaining to the actual world; consequently, the organism will become extinct as a result of being less adapted, even though the amount of selective information has increased.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 5114</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Mathematicians are thus a generator of diversity, whereas empiricists are the selector postulated by Ashby. Naturally, mathematics is not a noise generator. It is a generator of order, of various “internal orders.”It creates orders that correspond, in a more or less fragmentary manner, to the real world. This fragmentary correspondence facilitates the development of science and technology—and thus of civilization.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 5203</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The question then arises as to how “fields&rdquo;—linguistic and gravitational ones—actually exist. This is quite a difficult question, concerning as it does the “ontological status”of examined phenomena. Bodies’ motions and linguistic articulations no doubt exist—but do they exist in exactly the same way that gravitation and language do? In&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 5339</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The reception of a text as a program that requires filling in within the range of acceptable interpretative oscillations is only one element in the hierarchically complex set of proceedings because we do not read to practice a relating or an ordering strategy but rather to learn something. An increase in the amount of information is the correct outcome of a reception that matters to us. As a general rule, transmission activates interpretive decisions and all the other control activities of a syntactic and semantic nature subliminally; that is, “the mental filling in of the fragmentary program”occurs in a way that is inaccessible to introspection.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 5365</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;When transmission efficacy turns out to be quite good, that is, the text’s constants are being transmitted even though the text as a program of “informational reconstruction”is full of gaps, this can be explained by the fact that the sender’s and the receiver’s brains are homomorphic systems characterized by a high degree of functional parallelism, especially if they were subject to analogous preprogramming from within the same culture.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 5375</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The formalization of a linguistic utterance aims at a maximum reduction of interpretive freedom. A formal language does not allow for alternative interpretations—at least, this is how it should be within an ideal limit. In reality, it turns out that this limit does not equal zero, which is why some expressions that are unambiguous for a mathematician turn out to be not so unambiguous for a digital machine.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 5378</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;[…] is not that the causal language of the genes is a tool that is not general enough, whose examination will not be of much use to the designer, because every “utterance”made in this “language”is “just”a self-actualizing production recipe for a particular copy of a given species—and nothing else. The language of heredity turns out to be surprisingly “excessive”in its universality. This language is a tool for constructing systems that can manage tasks that their very designer (i.e., this language) is not able to cope with because it lacks, for example, an appropriate semantic and syntactic apparatus.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 5435</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;We have to admit that the extent to which control will remain in human hands partly depends on a point of view. The fact that man is able to swim by himself does not mean that he is capable of crossing an ocean without a ship—not to mention jets and space rockets in this context! A similar evolution is starting, in a kind of parallel way, in the information universe. Man is capable of directing a gnostic machine toward a problem that he could perhaps solve by himself (either he himself or his great grandchildren), but in the process, the machine may open his eyes to a problem whose existence he did not even suspect. Who actually has the lead in the latter example?&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 5524</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;[…] no one else needs to be obeyed and served. Unless something changes, our numerous Western intellectuals say, man is going to drown in the hedonism of consumption. If only it was accompanied by some deep pleasure! Yet there is none: submerged into this slavish comfort, man is more and more bored and empty. Through inertia, the obsession with the accumulation of money and shiny objects is still with us, yet even those wonders of civilization turn out to be of no use. Nothing shows him what to do, what to aim for, what to dream about, what hope to have. What is man left with then? The fear of old age and illness and the pills that restore mental balance—which he is losing, in being irrevocably separated from transcendence.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 5622</div></div><p>Goal acheived</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Yet who created your “real”world? If it did indeed have a creator, does this not mean it is a similar kind of “deception&rdquo;? No? Where is the difference then? We both created a civilization; does this mean it is also a deception? Finally, as biological organisms, we are a product of the natural process, which shaped us through millions of games of chance. Why is it a bad thing that we want to take this process into our own hands?&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 5673</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;His main difficulty lies in ensuring that the creatures for whom the Universe will serve as a habitat do not find out about its “artificiality.”One is right to be concerned that the very suspicion that there may be something else beyond “everything”would immediately encourage them to seek exit from this “everything.”Considering themselves prisoners of the latter, they would storm their surroundings, looking for a way out—out of pure curiosity, if nothing else. Just preventing them from finding the exit would amount to offering them knowledge about their imprisonment, while simultaneously taking away the keys. We must not therefore cover up or barricade the exit. We must make its existence impossible to guess. Otherwise, the inhabitants will start feeling like prisoners, even if that “prison”was actually to be the size of the whole Galaxy.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 5777</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;[…] by the global receiver, that is, consciousness.“&gt;It is only then that they would be able to see that our world is one level of Reality short when compared with theirs (since they are made of electrical impulses and it is only those impulses that are made of the same material that our world is). Figuratively speaking, a created world is perhaps like a very stable, very long, and internally coherent dream that no one is dreaming but that rather “is dreaming itself&rdquo;—inside a “digital machine.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 5802</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;[…] was probably then that primitive man acquired considerable longevity when compared with the anthropoids. Indeed, individuals from groups that had the most experience, that is, the oldest and the longest living, won the struggle for survival. It was the first time during evolution that a species that was capable of longevity had been selected because, for the first time, that particular trait turned out to be biologically valuable as a treasury of information.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 5881</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The history of civilization, with its anthropoid prologue and the possible extensions we have outlined here, is a process of expanding the range of homeostasis, that is, of man changing his environment, over the period of between a thousand and three thousand years. This ability, which penetrates the micro and macro universe with its technical tools, all the way to its furthest visible “pantocreatic”limit, does not touch the human organism itself. Man remains the last relic of Nature, the last “authentic product of Nature”inside the world he himself is creating. This state of events cannot last for an indefinite period of time. The invasion of technology created by man into his body is inevitable.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 5919</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;which will involve replacing Nature’s evolutionary gradients with man’s purposeful regulatory activity. Such regulation can in turn have various goals. It may focus on eliminating all those harmful consequences caused by the absence of natural selection, which destroys the inadequately adapted, from the artificial environment of that civilization.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 5931</div></div><p>This current period, with its anti-evolutionary attitude, near love, of the evolutionarily disadvantaged, will be seen as a backwards religious curiosity in the future. At best. At worst, they will perceive us as criminally pushing for the end of humanity.</p>
<p>A hundred years from now, when nature is drastically outpacing evolution’s ability to adapt, man will no longer have the luxury of hewing to a moral code that forbids genetic engineering of humans.</p>
<p>The blind, the deaf, the retarded, the autistic, the unmotivated, the stupid, the weak…they will sink when their survival depends on them swimming. Being saddled with them because of an outdated morality will be a luxury no-one will be able to afford.</p>
<p>It will be seen as far more efficient to tweak genetics to keep members of society within a physical bandwidth that if not of actual use in one way or another, at least imposes a minimum of effort.</p>
<p>We will no longer have the luxury of keeping useless people alive. This is not eugenics; this is a much harsher world than we know. The future will contain a desperation unknown for centuries to the first-world person. Third-world people-¾ of the world-are already intimately familiar with this harsh, cruel algebra.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;When, in planning human reconstruction, we limit ourselves to the means whose development will facilitate the information transfer of the human genotype, we simultaneously give up, completely unnecessarily, on supplying the body with some enhanced systems and some new functions that would be very useful and valuable for it.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 5977</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;It would be an act of extreme madness if man really was to undergo a transformation owing to the technologies that he himself has created and if he was to consider a robot with a perfect crystalline brain his successor. It would actually amount to a collective suicide of the human race, even though such a suicide would be covered up by the apparent continuation of humanity in thinking machines—which are part of the technology created by man. In this way, man would ultimately allow the technology he himself has brought about to push him out of his place of existence, of his ecological niche. Having removed a less adapted species from the stage of history, technology would thus become a new synthetic species.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 5984</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The organism should avoid the final products of excretion: this is important from a biological point of view. Yet at the same time, it should aim at sexual conjunction, which is needed for evolutionary purposes. The concentration of two such diametrically opposite yet important imperatives must have contributed to the wide emergence of myths about the original sin and about the natural impurity of sex life and its manifestations. Torn between genetically programmed repulsion and attraction, the mind would produce either civilizations based on the idea of sin and guilt or civilizations based around shame and ritualized debauchery.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 5997</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Today we believe that it is possible to create a symphony, sculpture, or painting via a conscious mental effort. At the same time, the thought of “composing”a successor for ourselves, with any kind of orchestration of his spiritual and physical traits we want, seems like a terrible heresy. Yet the desire to fly or to study the human body, machine building, or examining the origins of life on Earth also used to be seen as heresies in the past.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 6025</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;If we are to behave like intellectual cowards, we can, of course, remain silent on the topic of any probable future developments. But in that case, we should at least make it clear that we are behaving like cowards. Man cannot change the world without changing himself. We can take the first steps on a given path while pretending we do not know where it leads. Yet this is not the best strategy.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 6029</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;[…] eternal human problems would not exist. A biotechnological revolution does not just therefore mean annihilating the Homo sapiens but also its spiritual legacy. Unless we treat it as a figment of our imagination, this position seems rather scornful: instead of solving his problems and finding answers to the questions that have preoccupied him for centuries, man is to hide away from them in some kind of materialist perfection.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 6038</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;When, in the not-too-distant future, electricity will be produced directly, for example, in a microfusion cell, thus overcoming the troublesome circularity of the present transformations (of coal’s chemical energy into thermal energy, then of thermal into kinetic energy, and only then of kinetic energy into electrical energy), only a historian of technology will remember the design principle of the earlier generators.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 6060</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;[…] we also accept the possibility of the emergence, within liquid phases, of some other types of self-organization than the protein-based one, and maybe even the colloid-based one—whereby those other variants may be both “worse”and “better”than the “terrestrial”option. But what does this “worse”or “better”actually mean? Are we not trying to sneak in some kind of Platonism with those terms, some kind of entirely arbitrary valorization? Progress, or rather the possibility of progress, is our criterion.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 6182</div></div><p>Long discussion of cells and how they work and how they evolved.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;[…] is too early to think about constructing a “universal homeostat”such as the cell. We are taking the opposite trajectory to the one evolution took, because paradoxically, it is easier for us to construct narrowly specialized homeostats.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 6238</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;This clearly shows that man can beat Nature: the latter is only capable of constructing some of the possible homeostats; we, in turn, on gaining the necessary knowledge, will be able to build all of them. Such optimism when it comes to space design has to be coupled with some reservations, full of ifs and buts. We do not know whether humanity is going to gain all the information that is necessary for carrying out the previously described “construction tasks.”There may exist “an information acquisition threshold,”just as there exists a limit to the speed of light, yet we do not know anything about it. Besides, we should remind ourselves of the actual proportions involved in this “man against Nature”task. In the face of such a problem, we are like ants who are promising themselves to carry the Himalayas on their backs to another location. Perhaps I am exaggerating in favor of the ants. Perhaps their task would actually be easier. This is when we compare all of contemporary technologies to the tools at ants’ disposal, that is, their own jaws and backs. There is only one difference—the fact that ants can only develop their tools in the course of biological evolution, while we can start an information evolution, as already discussed. This difference may decide in favor of man’s victory one day.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 6283</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;[…] evolution never showed any “ambition” to solve the problem of homeostatic regulation over any period of time. Its efforts were entirely focused on another issue, which it approached up front: species longevity, the supraindividual immortality of life as a sum of homeostatic transformations on the scale of the planet.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 6337-6339</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Evolution was unable, for example, to produce mechanical devices such as the wheel because the wheel must be itself from its very beginning, that is, it must possess an axis of rotation, a hub, a disk, and so on. It would thus have needed to have developed in a staggered fashion because even the smallest wheel is already a finished wheel—and not some kind of “transition” stage.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 6633-6635</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;[…] biologists have correctly observed a number of times, Evolution is a diligent constructor only in working out absolutely vital solutions, as long as they serve the organism during the phase of its full vitality (for sexual reproduction purposes). But everything else that does not have such critical significance is more or less abandoned, left to the devices of accidental metamorphoses and completely blind strokes of luck.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 6662-6665</div></div><p>Of note here is that his literary description makes it seem as if evolution has agency. I don&rsquo;t think that is the intent.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The final stage of each evolutionary branch, that is, the currently living “model” that has been put into “mass production,” reflects, on one hand, the current conditions that it is expected to cope with, and on the other, the billion-year-long road of blind trials and searches that all its ancestors had traveled. Present-day solutions, which are inevitably compromised, are also tarnished with the inertia of all the previous designs—which also involved compromises.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 6688-6691</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The curse of every perfect specialization lies in the fact that it represents only an adaptation to the current conditions; the better the specialization, the easier it is for a change to those conditions to lead to extinction.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 6695-6696</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Today man is the most unreliable element in the machinery he has created—he is also the weakest link, mechanically, in the processes at work.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 6764-6765</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Aging is a similar distribution of processes that involves their gradual escape from central control. Death arrives when the distribution of those processes has achieved a critical value and when the reserves of all the compensatory apparatuses have become exhausted.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 6793-6795</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;In reality we are thus not lampooning this nonhuman creator for real. We are rather interested in something completely different. We just want to become more perfect designers than evolution ever was—and we must be careful not to repeat its “mistakes.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 6801-6803</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;When synthetic chemistry, information theory, and general systems theory develop much further, the human body will turn out to be the least perfect element in such a world. Human knowledge will exceed the biological knowledge accumulated in living systems. At that point, plans that, for the time being, are seen as aspersions cast against the perfection of evolutionary solutions will actually become realized.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 6882-6885</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;A book’s conclusion is to some extent its summary. It may thus be worth pondering once again the eagerness with which I have shifted responsibility for the future Gnosis of our species onto the dead shoulders of nonexistent machines. Someone could ask whether this was not caused by some kind of frustration of which the author himself was not fully aware, a frustration resulting from the fact that—owing to historical and his own limitations—he was unable to penetrate science and its prospects. Consequently, he seems to have invented, or rather slightly modernized, a version of the famous Ars Magna,1 which clever Lullus presented quite a long time ago, that is, in the year 1300, and which was rightly mocked by Swift in Gulliver’s Travels.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 7027-7033</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Fertilization is an act of “taking a molecular decision” in a confrontation between two partly alternative “hypotheses” about a future state of the organism, whereby the gametes of both sexes are “carriers” of those hypotheses.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 7045-7047</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The chromosomal language is also unreliable; it is an extravagant dispenser of synthetic pronouncements about the properties of the world because it understands the world’s statistical nature and acts according to it. It does not pay any attention to singular statements. What matters to it is the totality of expression over billions of years. It truly makes sense to learn such a language—because it constructs philosophers, while ours constructs only philosophies.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 7062-7065</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;As Lem himself puts it in the essay titled “Small Robots,” “we cannot exclude the possibility that machines equipped with sovereign will may at some point begin to resist us. I am not thinking, of course, of a robot rebellion against humankind, so beloved by all primitive purveyors of cognitive magic. My only point is that, with the rise in the degree of behavioral freedom, one can no longer preserve the ‘good and only the good,’ because this very freedom can also give rise to a touch of ‘evil.’ We can see this in natural evolution only too well, and this reflection may perhaps temper our intention to endow robots with free will.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 7084-7089</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;All these issues are both promising and debatable. They illustrate how unpredictable the development of knowledge is and how it would be wrong to assume that we already know with great certainty many fundamental laws that determine the nature of the Universe and also that any further discoveries would only fill in with detail this already more or less complete picture.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 7173-7176</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The preceding consequence of scientific progress is only apparently a paradox because ignorance can mean two different things. First, it refers to all this we do not know, while we also have no idea about our lack of knowledge (the Neanderthal man did not know anything about the nature of electrons, nor did he have any inkling about the possibility of their existence). This is, so to speak, “total” ignorance. Second, ignorance can also mean the awareness of the existence of a problem, coupled with the lack of knowledge with regard to its solution.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 7181-7185</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;For someone who can count to a hundred, there is actually no practical difference between a quintillion and infinity. Man as a researcher of the Universe is more like someone who has just learned arithmetic than like a mathematician who is freely juggling infinities.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 7194-7195</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;A creature from Mars, observing the circulation of the “vehicle liquid,” with its “motorcar-bodies” on terrestrial motorways, could easily consider this to be a purely statistical phenomenon. This creature would then consider the fact that Mr. Smith—who goes to work by car every day—suddenly turns back while halfway there, an “indeterministic” phenomenon. But he is turning back because he has left his briefcase at home. This was a “hidden parameter” of the phenomenon. Another person does not reach his destination because he has remembered that he has an important meeting or because he has noticed that the engine is overheating. Thus various purely deterministic factors can offer a total picture of a certain median behavior of a large mass of elementary phenomena—a mass that is only apparently homogeneous.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 7239-7245</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;A civilization does not stand for an increase in all possible kinds of freedom. Culinary freedom for cannibals, freedom to self-harm, and lots of other freedoms have already been crossed out from the magna charta liberatum of a society that is undergoing technological development. It is actually hard to understand why reproductive freedom would have to remain intact even if it was to lead to a total immobilization of individuals, to smashing the cultural tradition, to giving up, literally, on the Earth’s and sky’s beauty.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 7381-7385</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;properties of elements are relative because they can only convey the relation of one element to others. Thus, e.g., flammability is a relative term: we consider hydrogen to be flammable because it burns in oxygen’s atmosphere. If the Earth’s atmosphere consisted of methane the way the atmospheres of large planets do, then we would consider hydrogen to be an inflammable gas and oxygen a flammable one. It is a similar case with acids and alkalis: if we swap water for another solvent, the substances that appear in the environment as acids will become alkalis, weak acids will become strong, etc.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 7413-7418</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;[…] a scientist cannot work on the assumption that he is only creating a certain transient and impermanent link in the cognitive process, even if he was to hold such a philosophical position. A theory is “valid for a certain period of time”the whole of the history of science demonstrates this. Then it gives way to another theory. It is entirely possible that there exists a threshold of theoretical constructions that the human mind cannot cross by itself—but that it will be able to cross with the help of, say, an “intelligence amplifier.” A road toward future progress thus opens up before us, yet we still do not know whether some objective laws that cannot be overcome (such as, e.g., the speed of light) will not impede the construction process of such “amplifiers.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 7489-7495</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The criteria that currently determine practical ways of proceeding can go out of date (e.g., the criterion of economic profitability or energy saving does not apply anymore when a material process that is practically inexhaustible is the source of energy). Besides, when basic needs are being fully satisfied, the problem “what to do next,” i.e., whether we should create some new needs and, if so, what kind, comes to the fore.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 7547-7550</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;In any case, another reason why this phenomenon of “becoming detached,” “leaping into the future,” and experiencing “information eruption” would be a disaster rather than an actual developmental leap is that, as soon as the “information farm” has progressed too far ahead of the current state of knowledge about that civilization, the criteria for eliminating irrelevant information would disappear. In this way, the “farm” itself would be immediately transformed into a “bomb”—if not a megabyte then at least a gigabyte one; it would become a giant, with oceans of information produced by it leading to a most unusual deluge.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 7564-7569</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;today’s technologies of recording, protecting, and addressing information are not radically streamlined within the next fifty years, we shall be threatened with a vision that will be both grotesque and frightening: that of a world covered up with piles of books and of a humanity turned into busy librarians.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 7611-7613</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;On this “library front,” methodology understood as a set of directions for finding knowledge in the world should give way to “ariadnology”—which would stand for a guide to the labyrinth of the already assembled knowledge.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 7614-7615</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;It seems that the crisis of information distribution will lead to the strengthening of publication criteria in the future so that their original selection prevents the flooding of the professional market with insignificant works, works that are only produced to obtain an academic degree or to satisfy someone’s ambition. We can even think that presenting banal works will at last be declared a menace and thus will be seen as a violation of scientists’ professional ethics because such works create nothing but “noise” that prevents us from receiving valuable information—which is vital if knowledge is to grow further.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 7621-7626</div></div><p>Oh dear, I&rsquo;m afraid we&rsquo;ve disappointed Lem&rsquo;s hopes terribly.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;An opponent of “bioconstructionism” cannot limit himself to opposing any “plans for man’s redesign” but should rather give up on all of civilization’s achievements, such as medicine and technology, and retreat to the forest on all four. All the solutions and methods he does not criticize or oppose (e.g., the method of medical intervention) actually used to be opposed from standpoints similar to the one he has adopted. It is only the passage of time, and thus the acceptance of their effectiveness, that led to them being included in our civilization’s treasure chest, which is why they do not evoke opposition from anyone anymore.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 7679-7683</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;An opponent of bioconstructionism may reply that unique singular existence is priceless, which is why we should not, in our ignorance, manipulate genotypes by trying to free them from traits we consider harmful and by introducing others.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 7687-7689</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;the Earth’s atmosphere has been poisoned over decades by radioactive waste. The majority of respected geneticists and biologists would insist that this would lead to the emergence of numerous mutations in subsequent generations and that every nuclear test explosion meant a certain number of deformations, illnesses, and premature deaths caused by cancer, leukemia, etc. Also, those explosions were not to serve anything except increasing the nuclear potential of the interested parties. This kind of politics, continued up to this day by some states that deem themselves civilized, has produced at least thousands (or, more probably, tens of thousands) of victims. This is the world in which we live—and this is the world in which we are discussing the problems of bioconstructionism.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 7690-7696</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The aura of moral responsibility must envelop the field of bioconstructionism—which is an area of great risk (but also perhaps of equally great hope). Yet, given that man caused himself so much pain and suffering in previous centuries (and not only then) as a result of his uncontrolled activity on the scale of society and civilization, it is high time he took such a conscious and responsible risk as soon as the state of his knowledge allows for it, even if this knowledge remains incomplete.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 7704-7708</div></div>      </div>
      </div>
        <div class="footer">
    <div class="footer-data"><div class="footer-links"><ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/contact.php" title="">Contact</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/support.php" title="">Support</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/privacy.php" title="">Privacy</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/rights.php" title="">Rights</a></li></ul></div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="copyright">Copyright (c) 1999-2026 earthli.com. All Rights Reserved.</div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="versions">Powered by <ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore/app_news.php">earthli News 3.7</a></li><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore" title="">earthli WebCore&trade; 3.7</a></li></ul></div></div>    </div>
      </div>
  </div>  </body>
</html>
]]>
  </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
      <title type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[Adjustment Day: A Novel by Chuck Palahniuk (2018) (read in 2019)]]>
  </title>
    <id>https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3742</id>
    <link href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3742"/>
    <updated>2019-05-19T16:58:17+02:00</updated>
    <author>
        <name type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[Marco von Ballmoos]]>
  </name>
      <uri>https://earthli.com/users/marco</uri>
    </author>
      <summary type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<blockquote class="quote abstract "><div>Disclaimer: these are notes I took while reading this book. They include citations I found interesting or enlightening or particularly well-written. In some cases, I&rsquo;ve pointed out which of these applies to which citation; in others, I have not. Any benefit you gain from reading these notes is... [<a class="complete-text-link" href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3742">More</a>]</div></blockquote>]]>
  </summary>
      <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<html lang="en">
  <head>
    <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/themes/ice.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/fonts/raleway.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/core/medium.css">
  </head>
  <body>
<div class="style-controls">  <div class="page">
    <div class="page-body">
<div class="info-box-top">
<p>
Published by <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_user.php?name=marco" title="Marco von Ballmoos" class="visible">marco</a> on <span class="date-time">19. May 2019 16:58:17 (GMT-5)</span>
</p>
</div>
      <div class="text-flow wide">
  <blockquote class="quote abstract "><div>Disclaimer: these are notes I took while reading this book. They include citations I found interesting or enlightening or particularly well-written. In some cases, I&rsquo;ve pointed out which of these applies to which citation; in others, I have not. Any benefit you gain from reading these notes is purely incidental to the purpose they serve of reminding me what I once read. Please see Wikipedia for a summary if I&rsquo;ve failed to provide one sufficient for your purposes. If my notes serve to trigger an interest in this book, then I&rsquo;m happy for you.</div></blockquote><p>This story is told in flashbacks and flash-forwards, cutting back and forth between myriad characters. My summary untangles this all a bit.</p>
<p>This is the story of a brovolution, the logical conclusion of an increasingly divided population in America. It starts with a kidnapping. Walter hatches a plan to win Shasta&rsquo;s heart (captured within her voluptuous curves) by showing her how rich he&rsquo;s become. It&rsquo;s a standard adolescent fantasy. He thinks that he will get a new &ldquo;old man&rdquo; to teach him how to become rich. He kidnaps Talbott, a man who turns out to be even crazier than Walter.</p>
<p>In a reversal of the kidnapping situation, the old man tests Walter, finds him worthy and begins to order him about, pretending to acquiesce to his demand to &ldquo;make him rich&rdquo;. Walter wonders at the old man&rsquo;s convoluted approach, but trusts that it will work out. The whole time, the old man is tied naked to a chair, covered in the wounds from hundreds of cuts made by Walter as he searched for a subdermal tracker Talbott insisted he had, but which he&rsquo;d lied about to &ldquo;test&rdquo; Walter&rsquo;s dedication.</p>
<p>Walter becomes Talbott&rsquo;s amanuensis as he rants and raves, dictating the text that would become the blue-black book &ldquo;Adjustment Day&rdquo;. We would later learn that Talbott had said &ldquo;A Judgment Day&rdquo; and be led to wonder along with Walter what else he&rsquo;d mis-transcribed in a book that would become the user&rsquo;s manual for the next revolution in America.</p>
<p>The book drives people to revolution by revealing an age-old secret: older and middle-aged men have provoked and will continue to occasionally provoke wars in which they cull a useless younger—and expectant/hopeful— generation of men, simultaneously clearing out their rivals <em>and</em> reducing available men to such a minimum that women have no choice but to allow them much more leeway in order to ensure the survival of humanity. Men gain power through their self-imposed scarcity.</p>
<p>It is madness, of course. But there are enough who would start packing their go-bags at this point. Palahniuk knows this and plays to the stereotype.</p>
<p>Sneakily, the book has some pearls of wisdom—true revolutionary ideas not poisoned by Talbott&rsquo;s mad worldview—spread throughout. He makes some good points, but his proposed solutions are pure bullshit. E.g.</p>
<ul>
<li><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;“But identity politics,” Dawson continued, “has reduced the homosexual to nothing but his sexual preference. It has reduced the black to only his skin. And each has become a caricature of his former dignified self.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></li>
<li><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;[…] our lifetimes must not be measured in weekends. Our time on Earth must not be judged by wages earned and taxes paid.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></li>
<li><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;It was clear to Jamal that for whites their guilt constituted a uniquely white form of boasting. Their breast beating was a humblebrag always saying: We did this! We thwarted God in the Garden! We killed his son! We white people will do with other races and natural resources as we see fit! Showing off disguised as a mea culpa. For the white man, his guilt was his biggest badge of accomplishment. Only whites killed the planet with global warming so only whites could save it. Their boasting never let up. It was the white racket: Creating problems so they could rescue everybody.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></li>
<li><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;To make a career of rescuing people is also to create a permanent class in need of rescue.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></li>
<li><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Making others right makes them love you, according to Talbott, because we only love things we feel superior to. We only love those who don’t pose a threat. Making others right is the best method for controlling them.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></li></ul><p>The revolution starts with an online List. It is &ldquo;America&rsquo;s Least Wanted&rdquo;. Anyone can nominate someone for the list. Anyone can vote for people on the list. Those with the most votes remain; those without enough votes in a certain timespan are culled from the list. The others? They are to be culled come Adjustment Day.</p>
<p>When Adjustment Day comes, the members of the first lineages—hand-chosen cells full of people frustrated by society&rsquo;s utter subordination and humiliation and indoctrinated in the ways of Talbott&rsquo;s book—roll out, hunting down the people on The List, gaining the number of points allocated to that person and being able to use those points to participate in the new &ldquo;democracy&rdquo; that rises from the ashes of the slaughtered one. There are giant lime-lined pits waiting to receive the bodies of America&rsquo;s Least Wanted.</p>
<p>It is interesting that several of the members of the first lineage were students of one of the professors marked for slaughter, Brolly. Despite them having marked him for eradication, they would occasionally draw a parallel between what happened post-Adjustment Day and what Brolly had taught them from the world&rsquo;s literature and history in classes deemed otherwise &ldquo;useless&rdquo; by the Book.</p>
<p>There are myriad characters, all involved in the plot to overthrow America. The overthrow begins at about a third of the way through the book. In the rest, we watch the new countries develop in the ashes. The first third—maybe 40%—looks and feels like a flawless execution of the red-pill revolution frustrated whites are fantasizing about online all the time. There are cracks and little hints of doubt throughout, but a superficial and partial reading will find critics leveling charges of alt-rightism at Palahniuk. But read on to see the whole thing quickly careen into a mess far greater than what we have today.</p>
<p>The author lets the revolution go off without a single hitch. Everything goes perfectly as planned. There are no weak liberators, scared to shoot, no legislators worthy of redemption. Only professor Brolly in Jamal&rsquo;s head, living on as lessons Jamal didn&rsquo;t even realize he&rsquo;d learned, belying the uselessness with which education had been tagged in the Book.</p>
<p>In a way, the cruelty and coldness of the revolutionaries is uniform and unbelievable. Still, it was better in a way than the constant mercy/betrayal cycle in <em>Seveneves</em> by Neal Stephenson, where the protagonists let the legislators and former rulers live, only to see them worm their way back to power, again and again and again. The steeliness was a welcome change.</p>
<p>But pothead Walter and his gonads inspired everything, with his lust for Shasta. It&rsquo;s wonderfully done by Palahniuk. And for the other revolutionaries, always it comes down to the same thing, all the high-minded rhetoric masks the single question: can I fuck it? Men rule, women drool (literally, in Shasta&rsquo;s case, when she&rsquo;s &ldquo;proving&rdquo; her pure whiteness). The male fantasy doesn&rsquo;t stretch very far. The white male fantasy even less so.</p>
<p>Gaysia, Blacktopia and Caucasia are the main countries, with obvious segregated populations. There are complicated rules for mixed-race citizens and sexual preference takes precedence over race. Asians are sent back to Asia and Latinos sent to somewhere in South America. Jews go to Israel. It is crude and hews closely to the simplistic plans and ideas easily found on the Internet.</p>
<p>Blacktopia rides high, becoming the seat of technology based on the ancient nigh-magical secret science that blacks had long hidden from their oppressors. Caucasia reverts to medieval times, barely surviving in a benighted manner. Gaysia struggles to produce children, devolving to a country that forces its male members to donate sperm and its females to host children.</p>
<p>The revolution ends with a whimper, having destroyed much more than it repaired, being viewed as a failure by all save perhaps the denizens of Blacktopia. The world, presumably, looks on, bemused and vaguely embarrassed for America&rsquo;s inability to act grown-up.</p>
<h2>Citations</h2><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Such surplus young men, if they were somewhat educated and well fed, they yearned for status and would create havoc in pursuit of it. Gunnar held that starving people don’t strive for recognition. Likewise, illiterate boys will never recognize how history ignores them. But if the youth bulge is fed, well fed and schooled, they’ll become a pack of ravenous, attention-seeking wolves.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 10</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;So whenever Shasta started to take umbrage at their harassment, she considered how most of them would soon be bulldozed beneath arid dunes with like numbers of boisterous and extraneous Middle Eastern boys. She’d scamper through her course work while her male peers would be conscripted. Their muscles and pimples would be mangled under tank treads and blasted into screaming pieces by landmines just like the buried-alive, just-hatched baby roosters whose only crime had been being born the wrong gender.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 13</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;His best guess was that Americans were too fractured along the fault lines of personal identity politics. It seemed that no one cared about others being compelled to gird their loins and perish. Recent politics had effectively branded young men as an internal enemy—perpetrators of rape culture, school shooters, and neo-Nazis—and media-frightened Americans were glad to see these bad apples culled.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 19</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;His best guess was that Americans were too fractured along the fault lines of personal identity politics. It seemed that no one cared about others being compelled to gird their loins and perish. Recent politics had effectively branded young men as an internal enemy—perpetrators of rape culture, school shooters, and neo-Nazis—and media-frightened Americans were glad to see these bad apples culled. The mass media had done its state-instructed job to demonize draft-age men, greasing the skids for their induction.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 19</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Grim but true, rumor had it that this would be the fastest world war in history. Once the combatants were mustered along the battle front, a thermonuclear strike would eradicate everyone involved. A nonexistent terrorist group would be blamed for the nuke, and the warring nations could withdraw with no loss of face. The war would be declared a “draw.” Yet another war to end all wars.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 20</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The Census Bureau had recognized that the Millennials would be the largest demographic in national history. They’d be healthy and well educated, and eventually they’d all want respect and power. The dynamic had played itself out in countries like Rwanda and Ivory Coast, where surplus young men had sparked civil wars until the national infrastructure had been destroyed and the entire population reduced to grinding poverty. For a time, American officials had kept the lid on this human powder keg by dosing the boys with Ritalin.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 20</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;All of those ads for garage sales and yard sales and seal-point Siamese kittens, those people seeking to buy WWII souvenirs or Fiestaware or split, seasoned firewood, those were the underpinnings of the oldest political dynasties. At a nickel or a dollar per word, those pages had been the goldmine that had financed the high culture. The editorials and book reviews and investigative reporting that was awarded Pulitzer Prizes. According to Dr. Brolly, our brightest, most-erudite observations owed their existence to poor people trying to unload vintage Avon cologne bottles and unwanted timeshares.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 40</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;“Moments,” Piper read, “are the building blocks of our lives. And our lifetimes must not be measured in weekends. Our time on Earth must not be judged by wages earned and taxes paid.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 42</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;And these professors felt the future, for the first time in many years, might be an improvement. And both the journalists and the lecturers were mistaken. For schooling had given the people very little in exchange for their money. And the media had given nothing in exchange for the people’s time and attention.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 43</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;Because the Protestant religions had been created during a power-reversal ritual, those religions have always been wary of such a practice. Brolly nodded, knowingly. “The Pope, His Holiness, will continue to wash and kiss the feet of the poor on Holy Thursday, but the Protestants will never risk the same vulnerability.”</p>
<p>&ldquo;<strong>That was the fatal flaw of this great country, he surmised. It never allowed the weakest, the poorest and most disenfranchised to enjoy even an hour of ritualized power. Yes, we had castrated versions like Halloween and Christmas caroling for children, but there was nothing to exhaust the adult underclasses and leave them contented to remain poor for another year.</strong> (Emphasis added.)&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 50</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;He asked, “What’s his value up to?” Jamal was studying his phone, scrolling through a long list of names. He kept scrolling. The list got longer every day as people submitted their last-minute nominations. At last he said, “You’re not going to believe this . . .” Keishaun froze. “Tell me!” Jamal looked up from the screen, beaming. “Sixteen hundred votes . . .” His friend gasped. That practically made them their own political party. Keishaun covered his own mouth with both hands and whisper-shrieked with joy. As Jamal used the letter opener to carve away the dead&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 51</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Jamal leaned down to pick up the Alinsky book. Coolly assessing its pages, he said, “The time for pretty words has expired.” And he gently consigned the fragile paper to the hungry flames of the fireplace.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 52</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Caucasia is at war with Gaysia. Caucasia has always been at war with Gaysia.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 53</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;By this time a secret network of the chosen was cast. Ordinary men doing their jobs. Normal people. Quiet and drawing no attention, they continued to raise their families and pay their taxes and treat others with a knowing dignity, full in the knowledge that soon they’d be unleashed to resolve all the flaws contained in society.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 65</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;[…] repeating each other’s approved opinions about the world. To risk a conflicting idea would be dropping a turd in the happiness punchbowl, so Charlie and his brother-in-law hunkered down. They kept their heads low and didn’t draw any fire. They gobbled the turkey or Easter ham and pretended this wasn’t their lives disappearing into the past.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 65</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Living only on Saturday night, as it were.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 65</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Besides, she was among the parrots who said the world had to stay a certain way, and she’d live and die trying to earn gold stars from teachers who wanted to earn gold stars from teachers who yearned for gold stars.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 65</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Power meant Jamal not having to present himself as an imperfect copy of someone he’d never wanted to be in the first place.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 87</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Tomorrow they’d no longer be men who measured their time by red traffic lights and their pleasure by pints of microbrews.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 94</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;“But identity politics,” Dawson continued, “has reduced the homosexual to nothing but his sexual preference. It has reduced the black to only his skin. And each has become a caricature of his former dignified self.” Men like Dawson and Charlie had not left their drill presses and lathes in order to rescue the gays and blacks.</p>
<p>&ldquo;Their lines had formed to battle the same corrupt identity politics that were now forcing the white races into one monstrous stereotype. Theirs was perhaps the meanest of all caricatures. Instead of being salt-of-the-Earth machinists and carpenters, they were being compelled by modern politics to rally under one flag as goose-stepping Nazi NASCAR storm troopers.&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 94</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;But when Christian culture supplanted the Greeks, the Christians destroyed most of the comedies. Stories of tragedy reinforced the Christian viewpoint so the church preserved Oedipus the King and Medea and Prometheus Bound and eradicated all that did not celebrate the church’s ideals of suffering and martyrdom.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 104</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;When primitive man was prey, when he and his tribe ran in terror from a saber-toothed tiger or whatever, the man who fell would be eaten. For everyone else, his death would occur as a huge relief. According to Brolly all humor arises from escaping death.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 105</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The courtroom, the assembly chambers and on-location newscasts, the lecture halls, they stunk of gun smoke and spilled shit.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 106</div></div><p>Everything goes perfectly as planned. There are no weak liberators, scared to shoot, no legislators worthy of redemption. Only professor Brolly in Jamal&rsquo;s head.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Here Bing was summoned to come down from the gallery, and the target shrieked so cowardly that it was a pleasure to see him dead.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 106</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Adjustment Day would give him a fresh start. Whether it worked or not, it would be a radical shift. He’d be dead or in prison or a revolutionary hero, but any of those would be an improvement on the happy-sad, hopeful-fearful ordinary nobody the online world could watch getting older, getting taller, but never actually getting anywhere.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 107</div></div><p>The cruelty is uniform and unbelievable. Still, better in a way than the constant mercy/betrayal cycle in the Neal Stephenson book, where they let the legislators and former rulers live, only to see them worm their way back to power.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Here were all Walter’s dreams, of romancing Shasta with money, of rising above the economic mysteries that submerge most people,&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 111</div></div><p>This pothead and his gonads inspired everything. Wonderfully done.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;All public employees must remain servants of the people. They must forget their dreams of early retirement. Yes, they’d postponed their dreams in exchange for security and the promise that one day the young would relieve them. But now the young had seized control and were giddy with power. </p>
<p>&ldquo;Boys who’d never expected to attain drinking age—they’d been granted a future—and the last thing they wanted was to deliver mail or write parking tickets. So Talbott had called a temporary halt to retirements and sabbaticals and vacations in the public sector. Strictly as a short-term, stop-gap measure. For how long no one could say. Exempt were the police and military for they had aided the tribes.&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 121</div></div><p>Same as it ever was. New rulers. Same game.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Just as the French Reign of Terror had commenced by beheading royals, then expanded to severing the heads of clerics and clerks and servants, the danger existed that Adjustment Day would become an annual event.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 122</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;It struck Dawson as a shame. Looking at her, destitute like this, grit crusted around her cracked nostrils and caked in the corners of her mouth, her neck festering with mosquito bites and raw scratch marks, hidden under her unwashed stench and her claptrap political ideology he could tell she had once been a pretty fine-looking young lady.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 127</div></div><p>And always it comes down to the same thing, all the high-minded rhetoric masks the single question: can I fuck it?</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;He’d listened as his teacher, a woman who’d never been beyond North America, explained the whole of Europe and Asia. Gavyn had taken notes as another teacher, who’d never written so much as a short story, dissected Faulkner, Fitzgerald, and Donne. When he echoed back their pale misconceptions they praised him and pronounced him smart. Smart, yes, smart enough to know he still understood nothing and that his teachers were idiots.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 131</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;It was clear to Jamal that for whites their guilt constituted a uniquely white form of boasting. Their breast beating was a humblebrag always saying: We did this! We thwarted God in the Garden! We killed his son! We white people will do with other races and natural resources as we see fit! Showing off disguised as a mea culpa. For the white man, his guilt was his biggest badge of accomplishment. Only whites killed the planet with global warming so only whites could save it. Their boasting never let up. It was the white racket: Creating problems so they could rescue everybody.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 139</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Oh, and the women. They left Charlie breathless, the women who migrated to him in droves, young women, older women presenting their daughters, women who understood the value of their beauty and vitality in this market. To them Charlie, skinny Charlie, ridiculous Charlie who’d hardly finished high school and could only operate a drill press, these women who’d only ever snubbed him—that is, if they’d even realized he was alive—these days they fought among themselves merely to catch his eye.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 143</div></div><p>And there it is again: the core of all incel, red-pill fiction.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;For too long the differing strains of mankind have been blended into an increasingly blander pool. A culture of shared mediocrity that only serves as a broader field of consumers receptive to the same generic advertising and thus steered to desiring large amounts of a narrow spectrum of products.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 148</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;[…] the state of California had been set aside to create a homeland for male and female sodomites.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 150</div></div><p>What if you&rsquo;re gay and black? Which takes precedence?</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Here a woman risked everything if she stared a moment too long at a man. She could be fired from her job, evicted from her home. The government could take custody of her children, and she’d be deported to a homeland, white or black, where no one thought it a perversion for women and men to be intimate.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 169</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;To make a career of rescuing people is also to create a permanent class in need of rescue.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 175</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Due to the high number of homosexual youths in Caucasia waiting for exit visas, the queer nation was aggressively searching for closeted heterosexuals in order to trade them for the would-be gay emigrants.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 176</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Brach and his ilk, princes and barons they called themselves. Last month’s grease monkeys and dog groomers. An aristocracy of former steam fitters and garbage haulers. They’d picked up guns and blown the brains out of civilization. They’d read the Talbott book. They lived by it. By reading it herself she could guess how her life as a team wife would turn out. As a brood mare, popping out white babies to repopulate the new nation state. A string of babies born a year or less apart, what her own mom used to call “Irish twins.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 178</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;“We’re all self-deporting. The entire Mexican Diaspora is going Galt.” Meaning all Hispanics, Latinos, Chicanos were headed south of the border. “These white people are muy loco,” he laughed. “After they all starve or wipe out each other, we’ll come pick up the pieces.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 186</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;For example, he cited the paintings and carvings reputed to show Aztecs ripping out the hearts of human sacrifices. He knew for a fact such artwork actually depicted Mesoamericans conducting successful heart transplant surgeries. The lofty stone slabs atop their pyramids were in actuality operating tables placed where the healthy daylight was strongest.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 186</div></div><p>The Mesoamericans building contrarian myths  about themselves, just like the whites did. Bullshit? Probably.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Blacktopia had only recently announced a successful launch of its new flying pyramid, based on a long-forgotten antigravity technology suppressed by Eurocentric interests. After centuries of white denial the blacks had proven that pyramids built by the Egyptian pharaohs were in fact flying machines.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 187</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;That’s why Adjustment Day had gone down. It would give the few remaining alpha studs the chance to boost white numbers. It would remove the temptation of Women’s Studies degrees and other horseshit that baited ladies to let their precious Aryan eggs dry up. Adjustment Day gave men like Charlie, with loads of sperm and not the best grasp of Calculus II, the opportunity to catch up the game for the white team. Simple as that.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 193</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;“Terrorists working in league with the former president have claimed responsibility for the gas attack&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 198</div></div><p>Emmanuel Goldstein.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;And while the whites strived to increase their numbers, white science and technology stalled. And certain whites were not above infiltrating Blacktopia to plunder its brilliance. For white science and mathematics had been harnessed only to build atomic bombs while black intellect yielded, daily, new wonders that enriched life, especially the lives of women, for Blacktopia held its sisters as its greatest treasure.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 202</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;[…] the womenfolk of Xanthus had confronted the approaching waves. These enterprising females had lifted their skirts and faced the ocean with girl parts fully bared. Cross culturally, from Europe to Indonesia and South America, the ancient world had believed that exposed pussies would always frighten away evil. Up until the eighteenth century, above the doorways and gateways of castles and churches, masons had carved images of women squatting to reveal themselves.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 209</div></div><p>Look this up. Seems suspect.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;In the sky, directly overhead a formation of jumbo jetliners was escorting the last of the Asian genotypes back to their native continent. Shasta watched them go with despair. Caucasia had chosen haggis over yu xiang rou si.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 211</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Between wakefulness and sleep, people pass through the hypnagogic state, a phase when sleep walking occurs. Also common are hallucinations, visions of tripping over an obstacle or falling from a window, and the sleeper jerks awake. That sudden awakening, sleep experts called it the hypnagogic spasm. Anthropologists, according to Talbott, believe that our evolutionary ancestors had developed the spasm to guard against losing their grip on branches or the fur of the mother primate.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 218</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;If recovery groups were the churches of this era, they were still conducted in the old church buildings. As Christian churches had commandeered the temples previously devoted to Apollo and Diana, the local chapter of Narcotics Anonymous met in the basement of St. Stephens.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 222</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;When an outfit like Amway wanted to motivate rookie enrollees, it encouraged them to test drive Maseratis and Alfa Romeos. People were encouraged to shop for Gulfstream jets and contact real estate agents for tours of mansions on fairways and private beaches. Real details motivated people. The smell of leather seats and the sound of ocean waves under the bedroom windows.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 223</div></div><p>Does that really work? Do people somehow work harder for such goals? Maybe I&rsquo;ve never been desperate enough.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The moratorium, she meant. The big push to get anyone into STEM careers was dead. The edict was that white people were supposed to be breeding instead of reading.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 225</div></div><p>The white revolution has completely backfired.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;What she meant was that the nation of Gaysia had only recently launched its program to reproduce exports. It would be seventeen years before it yielded any heterosexuals who could be traded for the homosexuals stockpiled in Caucasia and Blacktopia.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 226</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The two-lane highway skirted fields that stretched to the horizon. As many rows of eggplants as there were ripples in the ocean. Tended by a platoon of stooped women with headscarves knotted to cover their hair. Refugees from the cities. The cities weren’t sustainable. Never mind all the recycling and wind turbine power, cities were never sustainable. They’d collapsed into pits of cannibalism with the lucky survivors streaming into the countryside.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 242</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Jamal’s first point of pride was the levitator. The same electro-spiritual principles that floated the great space pyramids, this same black-based technology allowed personal transport vehicles that amounted to small floating platforms that could skim along at incredible speeds.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 248</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;in Gaysia they were yoked to the national campaign for reproduction. Draconian sperm drives left most men with little money or energy. And women had lost all control over their reproductive rights.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 248</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Citizens of Caucasia were no better off. Where they’d excelled in science, they now banned it. They’d turned their focus to Jeffersonian agriculture and reinstating a white-European culture. The great metropolises of Caucasia had swiftly declined into deadly no-go zones where displaced liberal-arts majors stalked each other as food.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 248</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Blacks had resurrected all the pyro-spiritual and electro-expressive technologies they’d long kept hidden. These, the sacred laws of soul-metrics, had never been appropriated to enrich the white man’s brutal empire.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 249</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Word was the big land operations were fringed with favelas of displaced media and information workers. All living out of their dusty cars. Washed-up web designers and diversity officers, they were all hoping to prove themselves in the upcoming rhubarb harvest and to be awarded a thatched cottage before winter set in.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 259</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;A naked old man, his wrists and ankles flapping with scraps of dirty duct tape. His emaciated body looked glossy with dried blood. What might be a hash-mark carpet of tiny stab wounds dotted his spindly arms and legs. The man ambled along the deserted sidewalk.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 260</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;If she’d been born into this moment she’d see only peaceful women doing useful work to the sound of mandolins. Well fed, they were all healthy and plump with their future children. If she hadn’t known the world before Adjustment Day she wouldn’t see this Edenic scene through such a cynical, bitter lens. These future children would accept this life as a given.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 266</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Now Shasta surveyed the fields with new understanding. These women had all been bike messengers and basketball stars. Today they were hunched field wenches, doomed to imminent, repetitive motherhood. But not a year before they’d been drummers in rock bands. They’d been dope-smoking fire walkers and hairless pole dancers. How long ago had Adjustment Day occurred? Without cell phones or calendars, it was impossible to track the days. Only the weather suggested time passing.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 268</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;From Harry Potter to Superman to Luke Skywalker to Robin the Boy Wonder, it would seem that all kids wanted to develop their own latent superpowers and to see their parents dead.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 268</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;“I told you to call the book A Judgment Day!” Talbott ranted.</p>
<p>&ldquo;A Judgment Day.</p>
<p>&ldquo;God only knew what else Walter had misheard.</p>
<p>&ldquo;Talbott shook his head in disbelief. He snapped, “Is it too late to fix this . . . typographical error?”</p>
<p>&ldquo;A Judgment Day. Duh. And Walt lied. </p>
<p>&ldquo;He put on his best look of sincere confidence, and he told the old man, “Don’t worry. I’ll fix it.”&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 277</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Hearing such praise, Charlie lifted his chin, and his chest swelled with pride. To display his valuable Naugahyde gloves, he lifted a hand as if to straighten his weighty gold crown.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 284</div></div><p>Golgafrincham.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Making others right makes them love you, according to Talbott, because we only love things we feel superior to. We only love those who don’t pose a threat. Making others right is the best method for controlling them.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 294</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;the healer asked, “But tell me . . . why the lie?” Looking after her son as he disappeared into the distance, the beaming washerwoman shrugged. “I wanted him to believe in a father and by extension a God.” Watching until he was gone, she said, “Life’s just easier that way.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 313</div></div>      </div>
      </div>
        <div class="footer">
    <div class="footer-data"><div class="footer-links"><ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/contact.php" title="">Contact</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/support.php" title="">Support</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/privacy.php" title="">Privacy</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/rights.php" title="">Rights</a></li></ul></div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="copyright">Copyright (c) 1999-2026 earthli.com. All Rights Reserved.</div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="versions">Powered by <ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore/app_news.php">earthli News 3.7</a></li><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore" title="">earthli WebCore&trade; 3.7</a></li></ul></div></div>    </div>
      </div>
  </div>  </body>
</html>
]]>
  </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
      <title type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[Russia Without Putin: Money, Power and the Myths of the New Cold War by Tony Wood (2018) (read in 2019)]]>
  </title>
    <id>https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3737</id>
    <link href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3737"/>
    <updated>2019-05-19T00:49:14+02:00</updated>
    <author>
        <name type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[Marco von Ballmoos]]>
  </name>
      <uri>https://earthli.com/users/marco</uri>
    </author>
      <summary type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<blockquote class="quote abstract "><div>Disclaimer: these are notes I took while reading this book. They include citations I found interesting or enlightening or particularly well-written. In some cases, I&rsquo;ve pointed out which of these applies to which citation; in others, I have not. Any benefit you gain from reading these notes is... [<a class="complete-text-link" href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3737">More</a>]</div></blockquote>]]>
  </summary>
      <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<html lang="en">
  <head>
    <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/themes/ice.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/fonts/raleway.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/core/medium.css">
  </head>
  <body>
<div class="style-controls">  <div class="page">
    <div class="page-body">
<div class="info-box-top">
<p>
Published by <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_user.php?name=marco" title="Marco von Ballmoos" class="visible">marco</a> on <span class="date-time">19. May 2019 00:49:14 (GMT-5)</span>
</p>
</div>
      <div class="text-flow wide">
  <blockquote class="quote abstract "><div>Disclaimer: these are notes I took while reading this book. They include citations I found interesting or enlightening or particularly well-written. In some cases, I&rsquo;ve pointed out which of these applies to which citation; in others, I have not. Any benefit you gain from reading these notes is purely incidental to the purpose they serve of reminding me what I once read. Please see Wikipedia for a summary if I&rsquo;ve failed to provide one sufficient for your purposes. If my notes serve to trigger an interest in this book, then I&rsquo;m happy for you.</div></blockquote><p>I&rsquo;d listened to a couple of interviews with Tony Wood (on <em>This is Hell</em> with <em>Chuck Mertz</em> and <em>Behind the News</em> with <em>Doug Henwood</em>) and became interested in his book through his eloquent discussions of Russia. The book details the last three decades of history in Russia, from Gorbachev to Yeltsin and then Putin.</p>
<p>More specifically, he describes a Russia that&rsquo;s explicitly <em>not</em> its leader. Instead, it is a country that used to be much more powerful than it is now. It used to be much more advanced, more equal. Most importantly, it is <em>not</em> a capitalist failure. It is not retreating to its statist past. It would be better if it were. Instead, it is essentially a success story for the West: they helped suck the money and resources from a once-powerful enemy, creating a country for the 1%—in the image of its western forebears.</p>
<p>Mostly, Russia wasn&rsquo;t able to grow in a direction that would benefit itself. Instead, its massive resources and well-educated population were wasted or channeled to purposes conducive to the rulers of the rest of the world. If Russia&rsquo;s collapse benefitted the rich, then it was deemed to be &ldquo;reforming&rdquo;; otherwise, it was deemed to be &ldquo;yearning for the USSR&rdquo;. The formula was predictable and boring and effective.</p>
<p>All of Russia&rsquo;s corruption is utterly unremarkable and non-unique. Similar corruption exists in the U.S. and Britain and, at least to some degree, a handful of other western countries. When Wood describes the degree to which large banks and industries control policy in Russia, there is no real difference from how it works in the U.S, or Germany for that matter.</p>
<p>Is Russia&rsquo;s government saturated with industry insiders? Yes. How is that any different from Obama’s Goldman Sachs alums, chosen by Citibank? Or Trump’s coterie of industry insiders, each matched to the cabinet position that looks most like a henhouse to them?</p>
<p>Russia never had a chance: it was to be a vassal to the West or was to suffer until it acquiesced. There was never going to be another way. Russia is geographically huge, but has a relatively small population. It has a ton of resources and a well-educated populace, but it has a low birthrate (well-educated) and an unwelcome immigration wave is its only hope. Its economy is tied up with its resources—controlled by its enemies through control of commodity prices.</p>
<p>Russia occupies a middle ground. It has the low birthrate, culture, military hardware, attitude and high education of an advanced nation, but the life-expectancy and reputation of a poorer one. And America hates them, which makes their European and British lackeys do so as well, at least sometimes.</p>
<p>Putin and his attitudes and opinions are totally beside the point. Russia is its own thing—and its unclear how it will survive in a world with a powerful country like the US in control, bent on its submission.</p>
<h2>Citations</h2><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;But at least there was a sizeable body of writers, scholars, activists and thinkers who could supply a more nuanced perspective, based on first-hand experience. The West’s levels of expertise and awareness about Russia have, sadly, declined steeply since then, opening the way for all kinds of ill-informed speculation – often churned out by individuals with no knowledge of the place, let alone of the people or the language – to circulate unchallenged. As a result, public opinion and policy decisions are based on a very shallow understanding of the country.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 3</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Personal connections like these are crucial to understanding how Russia works.9 In the Soviet period, informal influence, or blat – translated as ‘pull’ – often dictated access to scarce goods, housing or coveted jobs. Its use was widespread because it was so essential to getting by.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 15</div></div><p>This is not a distinctly Russian practice. This is how things work everywhere.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;Every time the requirements of capitalist ‘transition’ came into conflict with the principle of popular sovereignty, Russia’s post-Soviet rulers made it clear enough where their loyalties lay. Yeltsin’s attack on the parliament in October 1993 was only the first in a long line of violations designed to shield a nascent post-Soviet capitalism from being held to account by the citizenry.</p>
<p>&ldquo;After Yeltsin’s re-election in 1996 – secured, it bears repeating, thanks to a combination of electoral fraud and Western meddling – Anatoly Chubais, one of the main architects of privatization in Russia, left the public in no doubt about what had been at stake: ‘Russian democracy is irrevocable, private ownership in Russia is irrevocable, market reforms in the Russian state are irrevocable.’&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 27</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The Western financial press in particular saw the apparent extension of state control as an attempt to reverse the 1990s market reforms.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 31</div></div><p>They call them &ldquo;reforms&rdquo;. The financial press is predictable. Immoral and focused on growth of their revenue streams. They don&rsquo;t care how it works: more money to them is good. Any reduction is bad.</p>
<p>They get mad when someone else gets to choose the winners. Who do those foreigners think they are, cutting off the children of privilege of the West?</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The vast majority were closely connected with state-owned enterprises. Often they were simply a way to siphon money into a few select hands: the ‘members’ who received dividends tended to be the managers of an enterprise rather than its workforce. Cooperatives were also allowed to set up their own financial arms, producing a plethora of ‘pocket banks’ that could borrow from the central bank at low rates – and of course issue ‘loans’ to members.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 34</div></div><p>How the fuck is this any different from America? The largest corporations are heavily subsidized with big government contracts. Money concentrates into the hands of a few shareholders. There are special rules for bank borrowing. It&rsquo;s arguable that it&rsquo;s impossible to get &ldquo;big&rdquo; in the States without government contracts. Google has them. Microsoft has them. IBM has them.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;The first was a ‘mass privatization’ scheme, launched with great fanfare in October 1992, in which citizens were issued with vouchers entitling them to buy shares in enterprises slated for privatization. By June 1994, some 15,000 enterprises, employing 17 million people – around two-thirds of the industrial workforce – had been auctioned off.</p>
<p>&ldquo;Nominally intended to create a kind of ‘popular capitalism’, in practice this produced a concentration of ownership and control among well-placed insiders from the nomenklatura and Soviet managerial elite. Managers often gained control of their workers’ shares, either by purchasing them or through more underhand means. And because voucher privatization took place in the middle of a catastrophic downturn, many workers sold their vouchers at a fraction of their face value to get hold of desperately needed cash.&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 35</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;‘From my point of view,’ Berezovsky told one interviewer, ‘in general, power and capital are inseparable’. He added, after a pause, that ‘if something is advantageous to capital, it goes without saying that it is advantageous to the nation’.23 Wealth seemed to be dictating terms to power, in a phenomenon often referred to as state capture.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 42</div></div><p>Again, there is no perceptible difference from American oligarchs.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;In a grim satire set in 2028, Vladimir Sorokin, enfant terrible of Russian literature, reimagined them as a deeper throwback, to the oprichnina, Ivan the Terrible’s private army, which terrorized Muscovy in the late sixteenth century.34 In another phantasmagorical satire on post-Soviet reality, novelist Viktor Pelevin took a trope in wide circulation at the time, the ‘werewolf in epaulets’, and made it literal, depicting Russia’s current rulers as petroleum-worshipping beasts in KGB attire, howling at the earth to deliver the bounty on which their power depended.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 49</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;By the end of the century, two successive ministers of fuel and energy had been recruited from oil companies, and a whole section of Putin’s early appointments to the presidential administration came directly from Alfa-Bank.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 50</div></div><p>Like Obama&rsquo;s Goldman Sachs alums, chosen by Citibank. Or Trump&rsquo;s coterie of industry insiders, each matched to the cabinet position that looks most like a henhouse to them.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;This two-way traffic between the worlds of the state and of private enterprise will no doubt be entirely familiar to many readers: the same kind of revolving door notoriously sustains elites around much of the globe, enabling them to waltz effortlessly between the boardrooms of Goldman Sachs and the corridors of power in Washington, London, Rome and elsewhere.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 51</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Why did so many Russians, during the petro-fuelled boom of that decade, rush to identify as members of a rising middle class, when by most indicators they would be classed as something else?&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 59</div></div><p>You can ask the same question of Americans. It has the same answer.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Soviet women also had to bear the main burden of housework and child-rearing, not to mention the recurrent, time-consuming task of queuing for food and other basic consumer goods. (Their partners did not offer much assistance. After comparing the time budgets of married and single women, one scholar concluded dryly that ‘the addition of a husband did absolutely nothing to ease the woman’s domestic burden’.)&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 62</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;According to World Bank data, in 1988 Russia had a Gini coefficient of 0.24, which placed it in the company of, say, Sweden; by 1993, the figure stood at 0.48, putting it on a par with Peru or the Philippines. These figures only cover officially declared income, so the actual rise in inequality was surely far greater; recent estimates based on a broader set of data show Russia’s Gini coefficient doubling in five years, from 0.32 in 1991 to 0.64 in 1996.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 63</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;In 1992 – the year Yeltsin initiated his ‘shock therapy’, including a deregulation of prices that tripled the cost of food virtually overnight – the International Labour Organization classed 85 per cent of the Russian population as poor.10 In response, the Yeltsin government adopted a new method for measuring poverty – whereupon the figure fell to 36 per cent.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 64</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;[A]s Russia’s GDP contracted by more than a third between 1991 and 1995 – a steeper decline than in the US during the Great Depression. According to World Bank figures from 1996, more than two-fifths of the population – some 60 million people – were living on less than $4 a day, compared with 2 million in 1989.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 64</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Reversing whatever gains women had made under Communism was presented as a return to the ‘natural’ state of affairs.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 71</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Having helped to turn an agrarian empire into a global superpower – complete with nuclear arsenal, space programme, advances in astrophysics and cybernetics – Russia’s scientists found themselves marking time amid its ruins.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 72</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;After 1991, the depth of the crisis often gave rise to a defensive solidarity between workers and management, as they strove to keep production going. In many cases this was the only way for workers to keep not only their jobs but also the housing and other basic social guarantees that were, for now, still provided at the enterprise level.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 76</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;In one 2010 study, people with higher degrees accounted for a fifth of those deemed ‘poor’ or ‘disadvantaged’.61 These sectors of the ‘middle class’ were being proletarianized, even as the onetime proletariat redefined itself as ‘middle class’.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 85</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;it may well be that much stronger opposition to the ‘imitation democratic’ system will emerge from the post-Communist generations, and that new forms of collective defiance will be forged not out of nostalgia for socialism but out of their shared experiences of capitalism. The future may prove more radically stubborn than the receding past.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 86</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;But the liberal parties’ electoral misfortunes also reflected the tremendous discredit their embrace of the free market in the 1990s had earned them.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 92</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;This is, of course, a familiar set of recipes. In some ways, the Party of Progress platform is a digest of the last three decades of conventional Western social and economic policy. The only real surprise here is seeing these ideas being actively recommended almost a decade after they led the world into a pervasive crisis from which no exit is in sight.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 109</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Yet this line of thinking rests on at least two mistaken assumptions. One is a belief in an abstract, idealized capitalism that could incarnate free-market principles in an undistorted fashion. No such model exists: there is no capitalism, no market, no economic activity even, outside of history.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 111</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;Gorbachev went much further than détente, speaking in 1989 of building a ‘common European home’. He envisaged an ultimate integration of Russia and the Warsaw Pact countries into a harmonious bloc of broadly social-democratic states, a kind of Greater Scandinavia.</p>
<p>&ldquo;Under Yeltsin, however, what had been an impulse toward convergence turned into a project to make Russia into a ‘normal’ liberal democracy, firmly under the tutelage of the US. If Gorbachev and his Politburo had stunned their Cold War interlocutors with the concessions they had been willing to make, Yeltsin’s government went still further, at times seeming to abdicate altogether from having policy goals of its own.&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 118</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;With less than 5 per cent of the world’s population, by the mid-1990s the US accounted for a quarter of its total economic output, a fifth of its manufacturing, and two fifths of its military spending – in dollar terms committing more to its armed forces than the next eleven highest-spending countries combined.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 120</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Putin’s points of reference were European even when they weren’t at all flattering: at the end of 1999, he said that it would take fifteen years of rapid growth for Russia to draw level with Portugal’s current per capita GDP.31 (Russia reached that milestone in 2011; but by then Portugal was further ahead, and even amid the deep recession sparked by the eurozone crisis, its GDP per capita was&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 127</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;In early August 2008, Georgian President Mikheil Saakashvili – seemingly with encouragement from the US – suddenly moved to recapture South Ossetia, providing Russia with a ready pretext for armed intervention. Militarily, the conflict was a mismatch, and was over after five days of fighting.</p>
<p>&ldquo;Politically, it was far more consequential. It was partly a kind of retaliation on the plane of international law for previous Western actions: Medvedev invoked the West’s own doctrines of ‘humanitarian intervention’ and the ‘responsibility to protect’ (‘R2P’), as deployed in Kosovo in 1999 and agreed at the UN’s 2005 World Summit, respectively. In the immediate aftermath of the war, moreover, the Kremlin recognized South Ossetia and Abkhazia as independent states, citing the barely six-month-old precedent of Kosovo. </p>
<p>&ldquo;The staggering hypocrisy of this gesture, from a government that had fought two wars to prevent Chechen independence, hardly needs emphasizing. But the Georgian operation was more immediately intended to call the West’s bluff on further NATO enlargement, effectively asking if it was willing to start a full-scale global war for the sake of tiny Georgia. The answer, despite much bluster from US Republicans such as John McCain, was no.&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 131</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;It was, of course, Yanukovych’s abrupt U-turn on the EU Association Agreement that sparked the Maidan protests in late 2013. Ukraine seemed to be caught in a choice between the EU’s free-trade agreement and the Kremlin’s project for a Eurasian Customs Union – a choice often framed by Maidan supporters in civilizational terms, as being between ‘Europe’ and ‘Asia’, between a modernizing European destiny and the backwardness of the Soviet past. Yet there were many other factors behind Yanukovych’s decision – not least a concern over the potential impact of free trade on an economy already reeling under the impact of IMF-decreed budgetary austerity.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 135</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;But despite the Kremlin’s references at the time to ‘Novorossiia’ – the old tsarist name for the lands along the Black Sea’s northern shore, hinting at a potential claim to more of Ukraine’s territory – these actions were tactical improvisations rather than part of a long-held plan to dismember Ukraine. The Kremlin was in effect frantically drawing one line in the sand after another, lines the West kept blithely ignoring. The rapid escalation of Russia’s response and the very crudity of its methods were in themselves a measure of the asymmetry of power between it and the West.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 136</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Sergei Lavrov told a TV interviewer that the US ‘needs to be taught that affairs can only be conducted on the basis of equality, balance of interests and mutual respect’.51 After the Maidan, and with the US and its allies bent on a policy of isolating Russia internationally, the urge to claim parity gave way to a more pressing need to reassert Russia’s relevance.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 140</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Even though Russia is by far the largest state in the Eurasian Union, the Union itself is nonetheless a deal made by sovereign governments, rather than an imperial Anschluss in the name of Russian ethno-national chauvinism.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 154</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The escalating confrontation with the West may have struck some in Russia as proof of Dugin’s ‘civilizational’ diagnoses – the Ukraine crisis and its aftermath finally confirming Russia’s definitive exclusion from, and opposition to, the Western liberal order. But neo-Eurasianist ideas had no role in producing the confrontation itself. As we have seen, from the start of the post-Soviet era there were fundamental mismatches in power and strategic interests between Russia and the West. These generated tensions that steadily rose over time, and notably burst into the open in Ukraine in 2003–04, Georgia in 2008 and Ukraine again in 2013–14, among other places.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 155</div></div><p>And the West shut out Russia as anything but a vassal from the beginning.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The most decisive feature of Russia’s present-day role in the world, which flows into every calculation it makes, is its intermediate status. Too big to be digested by regional blocs such as the EU, too independent of the US to admit into NATO, Russia is nonetheless no longer powerful enough to form a significant geopolitical or economic pole on its own.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 156</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Yet in 2015, for example, Russia devoted about a tenth as much money to its armed forces in absolute terms as the US did, and only slightly more than the UK; in per capita terms, it spent somewhat less than Germany or Greece. All told, its 2015 military budget came to around 8 per cent of the total for NATO as a whole, almost 70 per cent of which was spent by the US alone.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 156</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;For all the concern about the tentacular spread of Putin’s influence, its actual capacity to shape political outcomes has proved negligible to non-existent – the 2016 US elections very much included.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 157</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;For now, however, any post-American world seems a long way off. What happens in this long interregnum depends to a large extent on what the West does, since the basic power imbalance between it and Russia still governs strategic calculations on both sides. This leaves Russia hovering in a kind of geopolitical and historical limbo while the world is reconfigured around it. Yet during this interval Russia itself will not be standing still: several different far-reaching transformations will remake it from within.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 159</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The disproportionate size of the primary-resource sector spells trouble for the rest of the economy, as the experience of many other countries has shown, from the ‘Dutch Disease’ of the 1960s to the impact of oil on Nigeria and Venezuela. The overwhelming weight of lucrative export commodities causes currency appreciation that leaves other industries uncompetitive; this makes it all the more difficult to pursue alternative strategies for growth, deepening the ‘resource trap’.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 161</div></div><p>Russia occupies a middle ground. It has the low birthrate, culture, military hardware, attitude and high education of an advanced nation, but the life-expectancy and reputation of a poorer one. </p>
<p>And America hates them, which makes their European and British lackeys do so as well, at least sometimes.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;It remains the world’s largest country, with a still numerous and well-educated population, not to mention a nuclear arsenal and significant natural resources. But at the same time its economic weight is dwindling: in 2015, its GDP per capita was around a sixth that of the US, a fifth that of Germany and a quarter of the OECD average;&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 156</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Nominally, Russia today is a federation, comprising eighty-three territorial ‘subjects’ – plus two more since 2014, with the Republic of Crimea and the city of Sevastopol – each of which possesses its own constitution, government, parliament and flag. On paper, these entities have many of the attributes of statehood, and only delegate certain powers to the federal centre in Moscow. But the reality is very different: in practice, Russia is a highly centralized polity, and the country’s supposedly federal subunits are little more than administrative divisions within a clear hierarchy&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 165</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Although its options are limited in various ways, much nonetheless hangs on how the current system of government in Russia, whether under Putin or his eventual successors, responds to changing circumstances. The spike in tensions with the West has for the moment given the Putin-led system a certain amount of leeway, since it can ascribe many of the problems the country experiences to foreign enemies. It helps that this is not, factually speaking, incorrect: the sanctions regime imposed in 2014 prolonged Russia’s economic difficulties, and in the wake of Crimea and especially the 2016 US elections, Western media, pundits and politicians eagerly fanned a hostility to Russia that mirrored the hysteria of Russia’s own pro-Kremlin outlets.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 170</div></div>      </div>
      </div>
        <div class="footer">
    <div class="footer-data"><div class="footer-links"><ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/contact.php" title="">Contact</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/support.php" title="">Support</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/privacy.php" title="">Privacy</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/rights.php" title="">Rights</a></li></ul></div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="copyright">Copyright (c) 1999-2026 earthli.com. All Rights Reserved.</div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="versions">Powered by <ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore/app_news.php">earthli News 3.7</a></li><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore" title="">earthli WebCore&trade; 3.7</a></li></ul></div></div>    </div>
      </div>
  </div>  </body>
</html>
]]>
  </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
      <title type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[Jennifer Government by Max Barry (2003) (read in 2019)]]>
  </title>
    <id>https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3739</id>
    <link href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3739"/>
    <updated>2019-05-19T00:37:29+02:00</updated>
    <author>
        <name type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[Marco von Ballmoos]]>
  </name>
      <uri>https://earthli.com/users/marco</uri>
    </author>
      <summary type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<blockquote class="quote abstract "><div>Disclaimer: these are notes I took while reading this book. They include citations I found interesting or enlightening or particularly well-written. In some cases, I&rsquo;ve pointed out which of these applies to which citation; in others, I have not. Any benefit you gain from reading these notes is... [<a class="complete-text-link" href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3739">More</a>]</div></blockquote>]]>
  </summary>
      <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<html lang="en">
  <head>
    <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/themes/ice.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/fonts/raleway.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/core/medium.css">
  </head>
  <body>
<div class="style-controls">  <div class="page">
    <div class="page-body">
<div class="info-box-top">
<p>
Published by <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_user.php?name=marco" title="Marco von Ballmoos" class="visible">marco</a> on <span class="date-time">19. May 2019 00:37:29 (GMT-5)</span>
</p>
</div>
      <div class="text-flow wide">
  <blockquote class="quote abstract "><div>Disclaimer: these are notes I took while reading this book. They include citations I found interesting or enlightening or particularly well-written. In some cases, I&rsquo;ve pointed out which of these applies to which citation; in others, I have not. Any benefit you gain from reading these notes is purely incidental to the purpose they serve of reminding me what I once read. Please see Wikipedia for a summary if I&rsquo;ve failed to provide one sufficient for your purposes. If my notes serve to trigger an interest in this book, then I&rsquo;m happy for you.</div></blockquote><p>This 2003 book is the story of a world in which many of the current capitulations to corporatist rule were still at-least partially in the future. The Government is an entity whose power has been severely restricted. Local police is for-hire only. They only pursue cases for which victims can provide a budget.</p>
<p>Hack Nike works for Nike (everyone takes their employer&rsquo;s name as their last name). He is roped into a murder contract by John Nike. It is part of a marketing campaign to sell sneakers to stupid teenagers. Marketing rules supreme, people are nearly perfect consumers, ethics is a thing of the past. Hack lives with the unemployed Victoria, who is working on a virus that can kill any IT system.</p>
<p>Buy Mitsui is a broker who loses faith in the system. Claire is Violet&rsquo;s socialist sister. The eponymous Jennifer Government is a former marketer turned federal agent, hot on John Nike&rsquo;s tail, with whom she shares a past.</p>
<p>The main thread of the book is that most corporations are banding together into two factions, roughly delineated by the two prevalent rewards programs. The corporations and various alliances act more and more as independent states, with their own militaries (e.g. the NRA). Everything is a negotiation, everything is a transaction, money is God, all in the name of a bizarre notion of &ldquo;freedom&rdquo;.</p>
<p>There is no difference between corporations and nation-states. In fact, the book generally depicts corporations acting as the worst of the nation-states do today. Even those individuals who think they can game this system are wrong. The point is that contracts aren’t worth the paper they’re printed on if they can’t be enforced. If there is no overarching authority, then criminals do what they want. Only the worst people win.</p>
<p>There are echoes of <em>Fight Club</em> and <em>Office Space</em> and maybe even <em>Mr. Robot</em>. It&rsquo;s interesting to see these ideas having been written down 15 years ago, before many of its ideas were confirmed—or vastly superseded by the system we have today.</p>
<p>Barry does bring us a happy ending of sorts, but only for a handful of characters—the world itself is largely unchanged, even if corporate power is slightly restrained. The base philosophy hasn&rsquo;t changed, so the same problems will come back.</p>
<h2>Citations</h2><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Companies were getting a lot tougher on labor contracts these days; Hack had heard stories. At Adidas, if you quit your job and your replacement wasn’t as competent, they sued you for lost profits.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 204-206</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;“I think I’m going to take a look,” Buy said. “You should leave it to mall security,” the dealer said. “I know first aid.” Not many people did; there was too much risk of being sued.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 662-664</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;He bit his lip. “You sure you don’t want to come? Since, I mean, you killed that guy…” “You want me to defend myself against a murder charge with two hundred dollars?” “But it was self-defense. It doesn’t matter how much money—” “Don’t be naïve,” Violet said. “Look, if my demo goes&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 1223-1226</div></div><p>This is already where we are.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;come out owing them for food and board.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 1317-1318</div></div><p>The language is dying</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;“It’s a good deal,” Calvin said, overtaking a Chrysler. “It’s not like I actually spend more. I buy what I would have anyway, but from US Alliance companies.” “Mmm,” Jennifer said. “You buy your computer from IBM, your gas from Shell, use AT&amp;T for calls… soon you’re getting gift vouchers, for like, fifty bucks. And if you buy a car—” “I don’t like loyalty programs.” “Well, you could go with Team Advantage,” Calvin said. “But US Alliance has twice as many companies that are number one in their industry.” “What is that, from their brochure?”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 1546-1552</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;“No more talking. I’ve offered you a deal, you say yes or no.” “Fuckers!” Jesus shouted. “The fucking nnnnn-nnnnn—” “Quiet!” Jennifer said. “All right,” Billy said, feeling hope drain away. “Get me out of here.” She held open the door. He left the cell, feeling like he was sinking deeper and deeper.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 1903-1907</div></div><p>People keep getting offered choices that aren&rsquo;t choices. Shows quite well how such a system ends up working. How it does wok.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;“And ten years later we have US Alliance and Team Advantage, and there aren’t more than five major companies in the world that haven’t signed up with one of them. The more companies joined in, the more customers signed up, and so the more companies want in. At the end of last month, US Alliance had five hundred million subscribers. T.A. has two-ninety million.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 2020-2022</div></div><p>Peanuts compared to FaceBook and co.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;People were going to say he’d cracked, that he’d been grief-stricken. But that wasn’t it. The truth was simpler: nothing Buy could ever do would be as important as saving that girl Hayley’s life. He couldn’t watch a girl bleed to death and then go make 3 percent off stock trades. The idea was monstrous. So Buy was finished as a productive member of society, unless he managed to lose so much perspective that margin calls began to seem important again. Either way, Buy was prepared to put a gun in his mouth and pull the trigger.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 2185-2189</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;“To begin, I shall tell you of a program belonging to our friends at IBM. They are rewarding customers who bring in a competitive product and submit it to their in-house crushing machine. It smashes it in-store, you see?” “Yes, I see—” “A most brilliant strategy, to relegate the competition to the status of junk and garbage. You must understand, it is difficult for we Japanese to think along these lines of head-to-head competition. This is why we are now finding ourselves running behind our energetic American friends. But the times they are a-changing, are they not?”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 2200-2205</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The easier your job, the more you got paid. John had suspected this for many years, but here was the proof: pulling down five hundred bucks an hour to sit in the afternoon sun on top of an L.A. office tower. He was wearing a suit and shades, reclining on a deck chair while a light breeze blew in from the bay. John thought he might have found the perfect job.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 2346-2348</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Is it my fault that was the best way to do it? If the Government had the muscle to enforce the law, it wouldn’t have made economic sense, but they don’t, and it did. This is the world we live in. If you don’t take advantage of the rules, you’re a sucker.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 2384-2386</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;She felt the air go out of her. “No way am I going to do that. No way.” “You have a lot of money at stake.” “You—you owe me that money whether I help you or not.” “Be realistic,” Holly said. “No!” Violet heard her voice tremble. “I’m not going anywhere near John Nike! You get that?” She slung her bag over her shoulder. A man stepped into the doorway, blocking it. He was wearing a Police soldier uniform. His nametag said: ONE. “Maybe I made this sound too much like a request,” Holly said […]&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 3113-3118</div></div><p>The point is that contracts aren&rsquo;t worth the paper they&rsquo;re printed on if they can&rsquo;t be enforced. If there is no overarching authority, then criminals do what they want. Only the worst people win.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;She felt the air go out of her. “No way am I going to do that. No way.” “You have a lot of money at stake.” “You—you owe me that money whether I help you or not.” “Be realistic,” Holly said. “No!” Violet heard her voice tremble. “I’m not going anywhere near John Nike! You get that?” She slung her bag over her shoulder. A man stepped into the doorway, blocking it. He was wearing a Police soldier uniform. His nametag said: ONE. “Maybe I made this sound too much like a request,” Holly said, and Violet started to cry.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 3113-3118</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;“We’re the Government,” she said, just in case there had been some misunderstanding. “We are arresting three people on suspicion of murder.” “No, ma’am. You are on General Motors property and you will comply with GM orders.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 3242-3244</div></div><p>There is no difference between corporations and nation-states. In fact, the book generally depicts corporations acting as the worst of the nation-states do.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;She said quietly, “You’d better be very sure your employer can protect you from the Government.” “I’m very sure.” She felt her heart twist. To her people, she said, “Let them go.” The NRA watched them all the way to the van.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 3253-3256</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;“We came here in good faith, to talk about solutions.”</p>
<p>&ldquo;John’s voice was piped through the hall, so it sounded like he were right in front of you.</p>
<p>&ldquo;“But the Government didn’t. This morning, it conducted raids against us. It targeted our companies, only because we’ve been successful at providing products people want to buy. It trespassed on our private property and assaulted some of our executives.”&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 3332-3335</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;“By this action, the Government has proved that so long as it exists, none of us are truly free. Government and freedom are mutually exclusive. So if we value freedom, there’s only one conclusion. It’s time to get rid of this leftover relic we call Government.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 3337-3339</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>“US Alliance has had enough of being persecuted for the crime of making money. From this moment, we no longer recognize them as an authority. It’s time for a brave new age. I hereby declare the end of Government. And you, sir, are out of a job.”</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 3341-3342</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>“You announced that US Alliance is a criminal organization.”</p>
<p>“Criminal,” he said. “What is that, anyway? Just someone the Government doesn’t agree with.”</p>
<p>“Don’t play games with me, John. Our organization exists to gain market share from Team Advantage. The Government is peripheral.”</p>
<p>“How can we fight Team Advantage with the Government as referee? The Government is the major obstacle to our goals. We can’t ignore them, Alfonse. They’re coming after us. We had to send them a message.”</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 3462-3467</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;He parked and went into the Nike building, nodding to the receptionist. He felt more energetic these days, much more confident. He was friendly to people he previously hadn’t had the nerve to talk to. The funny thing was that his boss thought Hack had become dynamic and effective, when Hack was doing less work than ever before. In fact, he was hardly working at all.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 3542-3545</div></div><p>Echoes of <em>Fight Club</em> and <em>Office Space</em> and maybe even <em>Mr. Robot</em>.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>“Okay, so everyone’s a little surprised about the jet thing.”</p>
<p>Snorts of outrage. The McDonald’s Liaison looked like she wanted to leap across the desk and slap him.</p>
<p>Alfonse said, “John, in case you haven’t already gathered, we’re here to vote on your expulsion from US Alliance. If this vote carries, UA and its member companies will disown any responsibility for your actions. We will deliver you to the Government and negotiate compensation for the damage you’ve caused.”</p>
<p>“So I was right,” John said. “It is the United Nations.”</p>
<p>“He doesn’t think he’s done anything wrong,” the IBM Liaison snapped. He was an older man with white hair and a dark blue suit; John had never met him. “Look at him. He’s turned the world’s most distinguished corporations into criminals and he’s smirking.”</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 3595-3602</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;I’ve given you a world without Government interference. There is now no advertising campaign, no inter-company deal, no promotion, no action you can’t take. You want to pay kids to get the swoosh tattooed on their foreheads? Who’s going to stop you? You want to make computers that need repair after three months? Who’s going to stop you? You want to reward consumers who complain about your competitors in the media? You want to pay them for recruiting their little brothers and sisters to your brand of cigarettes? You want the NRA to help you eliminate your competition? Then do it. Just do it.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 3627-3632</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;She cried and hated herself. This wasn’t meant to be her, this small, beaten girl. She was meant to succeed. Other people had taken it all away from her.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 3863-3864 by <cite>Violet</cite></div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;It was amazing, he thought, how everyone bitched about corporations but no one was willing to risk pissing them off. Hack was disappointed at the level of motivation among this society’s counterculture.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 4178-4179</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>“I used to think I was cynical about people. But then I realized you can’t be too cynical. People will do anything to get ahead. They’ll do terrible things.”</p>
<p>He looked at her. “That is true.” He stuck out his hand. “I’m Buy.”</p>
<p>She smiled. “Violet.” They shook hands. “I guess we have a bit in common.”</p>
<p>“I guess we do,” Buy said, and laughed.</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 4328-4331</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;There was a mall across the road, with a McDonald’s on one side and a Burger King on the other. In between the two was a riot. A bunch of kids in baggy clothes were looting the Burger King: pulling down posters, smashing cash registers.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 4854-4855</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;His words were lost in one of the loudest sounds Jennifer had ever heard. The Police had mounted a machine gun on the Burger King counter and it was chewing up the McDonald’s store. Shreds of red and yellow plastic spiraled into the air like confetti.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 4873-4875</div></div>      </div>
      </div>
        <div class="footer">
    <div class="footer-data"><div class="footer-links"><ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/contact.php" title="">Contact</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/support.php" title="">Support</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/privacy.php" title="">Privacy</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/rights.php" title="">Rights</a></li></ul></div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="copyright">Copyright (c) 1999-2026 earthli.com. All Rights Reserved.</div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="versions">Powered by <ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore/app_news.php">earthli News 3.7</a></li><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore" title="">earthli WebCore&trade; 3.7</a></li></ul></div></div>    </div>
      </div>
  </div>  </body>
</html>
]]>
  </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
      <title type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[Nation by Terry Pratchett (2009) (read in 2019)]]>
  </title>
    <id>https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3734</id>
    <link href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3734"/>
    <updated>2019-04-20T22:16:37+02:00</updated>
    <author>
        <name type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[Marco von Ballmoos]]>
  </name>
      <uri>https://earthli.com/users/marco</uri>
    </author>
      <summary type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<blockquote class="quote abstract "><div>Disclaimer: these are notes I took while reading this book. They include citations I found interesting or enlightening or particularly well-written. In some cases, I&rsquo;ve pointed out which of these applies to which citation; in others, I have not. Any benefit you gain from reading these notes is... [<a class="complete-text-link" href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3734">More</a>]</div></blockquote>]]>
  </summary>
      <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<html lang="en">
  <head>
    <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/themes/ice.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/fonts/raleway.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/core/medium.css">
  </head>
  <body>
<div class="style-controls">  <div class="page">
    <div class="page-body">
<div class="info-box-top">
<p>
Published by <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_user.php?name=marco" title="Marco von Ballmoos" class="visible">marco</a> on <span class="date-time">20. Apr 2019 22:16:37 (GMT-5)</span>
</p>
</div>
      <div class="text-flow wide">
  <blockquote class="quote abstract "><div>Disclaimer: these are notes I took while reading this book. They include citations I found interesting or enlightening or particularly well-written. In some cases, I&rsquo;ve pointed out which of these applies to which citation; in others, I have not. Any benefit you gain from reading these notes is purely incidental to the purpose they serve of reminding me what I once read. Please see Wikipedia for a summary if I&rsquo;ve failed to provide one sufficient for your purposes. If my notes serve to trigger an interest in this book, then I&rsquo;m happy for you.</div></blockquote><p>This is the story of Mau. It is also the story of Daphne née Ermintrude. There are also the priest Ataba, the strong woman Chale, the brothers Pilu and Milo on the island. The island is known as the Nation. Actually, it is the people who are the Nation. The island is where the Nation lives.</p>
<p>As Mau is on his way back from another island on which he underwent his manhood ritual, a giant wave sweeps him up and carries him back to the Nation. It is a truly titanic wave and it sweeps away everyone he&rsquo;s ever known—they were all sleeping on the beach, awaiting his return.</p>
<p>Mau is young, but resourceful. He enters a fugue state to take care of all of the bodies left on the island. He wakes to a mango on a plate next to him.</p>
<p>The plate had been delivered to him by Daphne, the lone surviving member of the crew and passengers of the <em>Sweet Judy</em>, a ship that the wave deposited deep in the only forest on the Nation. Daphne and Mau meet and join forces to try to survive on the island.</p>
<p>More wave-survivors straggle ashore over the next days and weeks. They struggle with their future, mostly fighting about what it means for the Gods to have allowed the wave to sweep away everything.</p>
<p>They scavenge the Judy for supplies—Mau is concerned that they are relying to strongly on &ldquo;trouserman&rdquo; inventions. He wonders why his people never invented anything so spectacular. They discover secrets on the island; Mau&rsquo;s curiosity and skepticism leads to more conclusions than anyone&rsquo;s made about his culture in a long time. Daphne does the same—she is a scientist, taught by her father—but from the Women&rsquo;s Place.</p>
<p>The world on the outside is pressing in: England is without a King and a long, long line of successors have dropped like flies, leaving Daphne&rsquo;s father as King, and Daphne as Princess. She doesn&rsquo;t find out until late in the game. They must first attend to the matter of the Raiders—a cannibal tribe—who&rsquo;ve joined up with the surviving remnants of the part of Judy&rsquo;s crew that mutinied before the wave.</p>
<p>The world here is an alternate version of the Pacific in 1860, called the Pelagic Ocean, with a smattering of amusingly named islands. The society and history feels very familiar, different enough for distance, but close enough to make satirical and insightful observations about our own reality.</p>
<p>That is the skeleton of story on which Pratchett&rsquo;s writing hangs. It is highly interesting, but it&rsquo;s not the best part of the book. The best parts are the ruminations about science, multiple worlds, Gods, death and history. As with the Discworld books, Pratchett is just as interested in the subtext as in the story. He puts the interesting bits in the folds of the shrouds hanging on the story.</p>
<p>As in the Discworld books, there are a slew of good characters, each with delightful internal monologues. There are bad ones as well, funny and insightful in their own way (e.g. Cox). It seems that Pratchett books are Pratchett books, no matter where they&rsquo;re set. A lovely read. Highly recommended.</p>
<h2>Citations</h2><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;In the forest, something heard. And in the hidden firelight, sharp metal gleamed. Light died in the west. Night and tears took the Nation. The star of Water drifted among the clouds like a murderer softly leaving the scene of the crime.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 24</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Mau knew how make a spear, from picking a shaft to chipping a good sharp point. And when he’d finished, it was truly his, every part of it. The metal spear would be a lot better, but it would just be a . . . a thing. If it broke, he wouldn’t know how to make another one.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 142</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;So we’re not much better than the red crabs, Mau thought, as they dragged a heavy box down to the beach. The figs fall out of the trees, and that’s all they know. Can’t we be better than them?&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 143</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;But obviously she wasn’t going to take off her bodice or her pantaloons or her stockings. This was no time to go totally mad. You had to Maintain Standards.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 149</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;We never thought of pliers because we didn’t need them. Before you make something that is truly new, you first have to have a new thought. That’s the important thing. We didn’t need new things, so we didn’t think new thoughts.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 151</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Why can’t I do this? Mau thought. Where are my tears when I need them? Maybe the wave took them. Maybe Locaha drank them, or I left them in the dark water. But I can’t feel them. Perhaps you need a soul to cry.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 153</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;He dealt with troubling thoughts by simply not thinking them; it was as if someone had put a dog’s brain in a boy’s body, and right now, Mau would have given anything to be him.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 154</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;He’d looked at all the haggard faces, all of them willing him to say yes. Say yes, Mau, and betray your father and your uncles and your nation, just so that people would have a reason.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 168</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Things happen or do not happen, thought Mau, and he felt the deep water open up under him. The sunlight shone blue through the waves above, but below Mau it was green, shading to black. And there was Ataba, hanging in the light, not moving. Blood uncoiled in the water around him like smoke from a slow fire.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 177</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;When a shark is coming at you, you are already dead, old Nawi had said, and since you were already dead, then anything was worth trying.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 178</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Without quite being able to put words to it, Mau felt that being mysterious and a little dangerous was not a bad thing right now.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 179</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;That’s what the gods are! An answer that will do! Because there’s food to be caught and babies to be born and life to be lived and so there is no time for big, complicated, and worrying answers! Please give us a simple answer, so that we don’t have to think, because if we think, we might find answers that don’t fit the way we want the world to be.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 180</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;But Pilu had unfolded the story of the shark like Mr. Griffith had preached. He had unfolded a picture in the air and then made it move. Was it true? Had it really happened like that? But how could it not be true, now? They had been there. They had seen it. They had shared it.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 194</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Daphne had read in one of her books about the Great Southern Pelagic Ocean islands that “with a few regrettable examples, the larger and more fearsome the spider is, the less likely it is to be venomous.” She didn’t believe it. She could see Regrettable Examples everywhere, and she was sure that some of them were drooling.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 216</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;“I don’t think it’s true, though,” said Mau. Daphne nodded, and then thought a bit more. “Perhaps things can be true in special ways?” she suggested. “No. People say that when they want to believe lies,”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 222</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;She stood up, with one of the Sweet Judy’s lamps in each hand.</p>
<p>&ldquo;“One red one and one green one,” she said. “The spare port and starboard lights. Sorry about that, but we haven’t got very many cabin lamps left, and we’re short of oil.”</p>
<p>&ldquo;“What about that white lamp next to you?” asked Mau. “Yes, that’s the one I’m going to bring,” said the ghost girl, “and to save time, shall we pretend we’ve had the argument and I won?”&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 230</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;“I would be obliged if you would stop being concerned,” Ataba snapped. “I know what is happening. It starts with knives and cooking pots, and suddenly we belong to the trousermen, yes, and you send priests and our souls do not belong to us.”</p>
<p>&ldquo;“I’m not doing anything like that!”</p>
<p>&ldquo;“And when your father comes in his big boat? What will happen to us then?”</p>
<p>&ldquo;“I . . . don’t know,” said Daphne, which was better than telling the truth. We do tend to stick flags in places, she had to admit it herself. We do it almost absentmindedly, as though it’s a sort of chore.&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 232</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;The difference between the trousermen and the Raiders is that sooner or later the cannibals go away!”</p>
<p>&ldquo;“That’s a terrible thing to say!” said Daphne hotly. “We don’t eat people!” </p>
<p>&ldquo;“There are different ways to eat people, girl, and you are clever, oh yes, clever enough to know it. And sometimes the people don’t realize it’s happened until they hear the belch!”&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 233</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Daphne ran to stop Ataba from seeing her face. Her father, well, he was a decent man but, well, this century was a game of empires, apparently, and no little island was allowed to belong to itself. What would Mau do if someone stuck a flag on his beach?&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 233</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;“I don’t know! Don’t you think I haven’t asked them?” Tears started to roll down Ataba’s cheeks. “You think I am a man alone? I haven’t seen my daughter or her children since the wave. Do you hear what I say? It is not all about you! I envy your rage, demon boy. It fills you up! It feeds you, gives you strength. But the rest of us listen for the certainty, and there is nothing. Yet in our heads we know there must be . . . something, some reason, some pattern, some order, so we call upon the silent gods, because they are better than the darkness.&ldquo;&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 235</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;“Yeah, we got four loaded pistols, missie,” said Polegrave, waving one at her, “and they’ll stop anything, you hear?”</p>
<p>&ldquo;“They won’t stop the fifth man, Mr. Polegrave.”&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 251</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;“Why did you kill an old man who was shaking a stick at you? You shoot at people without a thought and you call them savages!&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 258</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The captain had told her that if Cox’s men won, she should fire the pistol into the barrel “to save her honor,” though she was uncertain how much a saved honor would be worth when it was falling out of the sky in tiny pieces, along with the rest of the cabin.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 271</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;“No! It’s been turned into a story. The moons are real! So are the rings! Your ancestors saw them, and I wish I knew how. Then they made up these songs and mothers sing them to their children! That’s how the knowledge gets passed down, except that you didn’t know it was knowledge! See how the gods shine? There are little plates of glass all over them. Your ancestors made glass. I’ve got an idea about that, too. Mau,&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 284</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Daphne had been taken to the ballet several times by her grandmother, who wanted to make sure she grew up to be a proper lady and not marry a godless scientist. She’d been bored silly, and the dancers were nothing like as graceful as she had expected. But Mau walked as if every part of his body knew where it was and where it was going to and exactly how fast it had to go to get there.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 291</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;First Mate Cox came toward them, smiling like someone greeting a long-lost friend who owed him money.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 301</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Everything that can happen must happen, and everything that can happen must have a world to happen in. That is why Imo builds so many worlds that there are not enough numbers to count them. That is why His fire glows so red. Good-bye, Mau. I look forward with interest to our next meeting.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 321 by <cite>Locaha (Mort)</cite></div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;“He told me that there were more worlds than there are numbers. There is no such thing as ‘does not happen.’ But there is always ‘happened somewhere else’—” He tried to explain, while she tried to understand.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 326</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;“I think people will say it belongs to the world.” “And they will be thinking like thieves. We have no right to it at all. But if we don’t act like stupid bullies, I’m sure they will be gracious.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 331</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;“All the red places belong to the English trousermen?” Mau asked.</p>
<p>&ldquo;“Yup,” said Pilu.</p>
<p>&ldquo;“That’s a lot of places!”</p>
<p>&ldquo;“Yup.”</p>
<p>&ldquo;“They’re not too bad,” said Pilu. “Mostly they want you to wear trousers and worship their god. He’s called God.”</p>
<p>&ldquo;“Just . . . God?”</p>
<p>&ldquo;“Right. He’s got a son who is a carpenter, an’ if you worship him, you climb the shining path when you die. The songs is nice and sometimes you get a biscuit.”&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 336</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;“Other people will come. Some will have guns,” said Mau thoughtfully.</p>
<p>&ldquo;“True,” said Pilu.</p>
<p>&ldquo;“There is a lot of the yellow gold in the cave. Trousermen like it because it shines. They are like children.”&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 337</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;For the sake of the game [Cahle] was banned from bowling after Daphne’s father explained that women should not really be allowed to play cricket because they fundamentally didn’t understand it. But it seemed to Daphne that Cahle understood it very well, and therefore tried to get it over with as quickly as possible so that they could get on with something more interesting, since in her opinion the world was overwhelmingly full of things that were more interesting than cricket.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 339</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;“Ah, and here is Her Ladyship now,” said Mr. Black, quite unnecessarily in Daphne’s view. He added: “She [Daphne&rsquo;s Grandmother] was wonderful company on the voyage out here. The nautical miles just flew past.” The little smile on his face was a masterpiece.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 344</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;“Ah, you’ve got it right at last, Mother,” said the king. </p>
<p>&ldquo;“I’m me, not us. I am I, not we. One pair of buttocks on the throne, one head in the crown. You, on the other hand, are a sharp-tongued harridan with the manners of a fox and don’t interrupt me when I’m talking!</p>
<p>&ldquo;How dare you insult our hosts! And before you utter a word, contemplate this: You treasure your elevation above what you call the lower classes, whom I’ve always found to be pretty decent people once they’ve had a chance to have a bath.</p>
<p>&ldquo;Well, I am king, you see—king—and the very notion of nobility that you cling to like grim death means that you will not answer me back. You will, however, act with grace and gratitude during the remainder of our stay in this place. </p>
<p>&ldquo;Who knows, it may speak to you as it has spoken to me. And if you are even now putting together a scathing remark, let me point out for your lengthy consideration the wonderful and highly advisable option of silence. That is a command!”&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 346</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;“I notice you didn’t laugh, Mr. Black!”</p>
<p>&ldquo;“No, Your Majesty. We are forbidden to laugh at the things kings say, sire, because otherwise we would be at it all day.”&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 349</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;There is no better medicine than finding out that you are wrong!&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 364</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;“Do you believe in Imo, sir?” asked the boy.</p>
<p>&ldquo;“Ah, the usual question. We come to it at last. You know Mau said that Imo made us clever enough to work out that He does not exist?”&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 365</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;One of the things he said was: </p>
<p>&ldquo;‘I cursed Imo because he gave the birds and animals a way to sense great waves, and didn’t give it to smart beings like us. But I realize that He did. He made us smart. It was up to us to be good at it!’</p>
<p>&ldquo;I think about that every time the seismograph beeps. But I’m not really answering you, am I?” The chair creaked. “Everything I know makes me believe Imo is in the order that is inherent, amazingly, in all things, and in the way the universe opens to our questioning. When I see the shining path over the lagoon, on an evening like this, at the end of a good day, I believe.”</p>
<p>&ldquo;“In Imo?” asked the girl.</p>
<p>&ldquo;This got a smile. “Perhaps. I just believe. You know, in things generally. That works too. Religion is not an exact science. Sometimes, of course, neither is science.”&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 366</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The greatest scientists in the world have taught here for generations, he thought as he made himself a cup of tea, and still our children ask us: Are there ghosts? What a piece of work is Man. . .&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 367</div></div>      </div>
      </div>
        <div class="footer">
    <div class="footer-data"><div class="footer-links"><ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/contact.php" title="">Contact</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/support.php" title="">Support</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/privacy.php" title="">Privacy</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/rights.php" title="">Rights</a></li></ul></div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="copyright">Copyright (c) 1999-2026 earthli.com. All Rights Reserved.</div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="versions">Powered by <ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore/app_news.php">earthli News 3.7</a></li><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore" title="">earthli WebCore&trade; 3.7</a></li></ul></div></div>    </div>
      </div>
  </div>  </body>
</html>
]]>
  </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
      <title type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[The Worst is Yet to Come by Peter Fleming (2019) (read in 2019)]]>
  </title>
    <id>https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3723</id>
    <link href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3723"/>
    <updated>2019-04-07T20:25:13+02:00</updated>
    <author>
        <name type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[Marco von Ballmoos]]>
  </name>
      <uri>https://earthli.com/users/marco</uri>
    </author>
      <summary type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<blockquote class="quote abstract "><div>Disclaimer: these are notes I took while reading this book. They include citations I found interesting or enlightening or particularly well-written. In some cases, I&rsquo;ve pointed out which of these applies to which citation; in others, I have not. Any benefit you gain from reading these notes is... [<a class="complete-text-link" href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3723">More</a>]</div></blockquote>]]>
  </summary>
      <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<html lang="en">
  <head>
    <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/themes/ice.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/fonts/raleway.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/core/medium.css">
  </head>
  <body>
<div class="style-controls">  <div class="page">
    <div class="page-body">
<div class="info-box-top">
<p>
Published by <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_user.php?name=marco" title="Marco von Ballmoos" class="visible">marco</a> on <span class="date-time">7. Apr 2019 20:25:13 (GMT-5)</span>
</p>
</div>
      <div class="text-flow wide">
  <blockquote class="quote abstract "><div>Disclaimer: these are notes I took while reading this book. They include citations I found interesting or enlightening or particularly well-written. In some cases, I&rsquo;ve pointed out which of these applies to which citation; in others, I have not. Any benefit you gain from reading these notes is purely incidental to the purpose they serve in reminding me of what I once read. Please see Wikipedia for a summary if I&rsquo;ve failed to provide one sufficient for your purposes. If my notes serve to trigger an interest in this book, then I&rsquo;m happy for you.</div></blockquote><p>Though this book was occasionally better-written and often more coherent than Snyder&rsquo;s (reviewed above), I occasionally got the same feeling that the author was squeezing his material to fit his premise (exactly as Snyder did). </p>
<p>The thesis that everything can—and probably will—get worse, is so broad that the author feels comfortable hanging pretty much anything he can think of happening in the world on it and try to make it stick. It&rsquo;s not uninteresting to see how his observations from life in London translate to premonitions of further doom, but it&rsquo;s also only rarely convincing.</p>
<p>And still he only got to about 160 pages, with a very generously sized &ldquo;Glossary&rdquo;, which was just another hodge-podge of mini-essays that he couldn&rsquo;t be bothered to integrate into the rest of the book.</p>
<p>I was grateful that I didn&rsquo;t buy this book, either. At least Snyder&rsquo;s felt like it&rsquo;d had an editor who&rsquo;d actually looked at it. Fleming&rsquo;s book was rife with typos, outright misspellings and bad grammar. At one point, he wrote &ldquo;tranny&rdquo; instead of &ldquo;tyranny&rdquo;. &lsquo;Nuff said.</p>
<h2>Citations</h2><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Neoliberal capitalism had probably run its course, spawning progeny it could no longer protect itself from. The constellation of possibilities that once flourished in cities like London had vanished. There were no antibodies left. Capitalism was undoing itself at nearly every turn. A kind of neo-Feudalism was on the march. Perhaps we were witnessing the birth of post-capitalism after all, not a clean and better alternative to the system, but (rather paradoxically) a much worse version of it,&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 9</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Neoliberalism’s mandatory individualism shrinks collective experience and the communal solicitude it engenders, keeping us hurried, alone and always on edge.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 10</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;As overwork transforms the home into a living nightmare (bickering about bills, unhappy children, Sky News), many react by escaping into work, embracing the very thing that caused the trouble to start with.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 11</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Like most large cities tethered to the sinking ship of late capitalism, London hates its children. So they hate it back.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 11</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;My theory is this. Most advanced industrial societies have actually outlived the principles of capitalism and are busy transitioning into something else. It is still too early to say what that “something else” might be. But we do know the break won’t be clean. So the post-capitalist future we should prepare for will be no classless utopia. The worst features of capitalism will be amplified and applied reductio ad absurdum, coalescing around the return of preindustrial norms of authority and an incredible polarisation of wealth.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 12</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;“On every new thing there lies already the shadow of annihilation”, Sebald avers. The corruption “of every individual, of every social order, indeed of the whole world” runs all the way down.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 33</div></div><p>What is it with these short books that endlessly cite Holocaust survivors.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Despite the self-help tone of his articles and talks, Petersen is actually peering into the void — or more precisely, the bottom of a lobster tank.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 38</div></div><p>He seems to be bending Pinker and Petersen&rsquo;s ideas to fit his thesis.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The most troubling part for me is this: since the financial crash over ten years ago — wrecking ordinary lives and spreading great hardship — the mega-rich have actually increased their wealth in a remarkable fashion. Sure, the initial crisis was a shambles. But what transpired in the decade that followed was probably worse, with a new breed of oligarchics mapping out a post-capitalist future, one that is starting to take shape.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 38</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;If a bomb shelter is the dominant metaphor we live by today, then be careful who you share yours with.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 40</div></div><p>This pithy bit of advice comes absolutely out of the blue; it&rsquo;s pure filler.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The conceit of homo economicus helped Friedman and Schultz build a more formalistic theory of human capital. This served an ideological purpose too. The very phrase “human capital” implies that human beings’ interests naturally coincide with the values of capitalism. No doubt the two economists believed this could be an effective retort to the Marxist threat.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 45</div></div><p>That&rsquo;s an interesting point: our economic theories, outlook and unswervingly propagandistic pedagogy stem from the Cold War.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The fear that unfriendly AI will break-off on its own and fuck the planet is unfounded. An uglier situation could emerge, where people play a very prominent role. If robotics is a manifestation of human power relationships, then it’s not the enslavement of mankind by some cybernetic “superintelligence” that will spell our demise. It will be the perpetuation of an exhausted present, only a deeper variant of it… a digital web of domination so stupid and inane that a “necrolypse” might look like welcome relief in comparison.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 62</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;If the religion of work is still promoted in the digital dark age, then post-workerism ought to be our central demand, including a radical shortening of the working day and week. Otherwise capitalism will produce its ultimate contradiction: the glorification of work in a world where jobs are rare.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 63</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;We’re now told that the real question is no longer when we will retire but if we’ll retire, with the prospect of working until you drop likely to become the norm. According to one concerned pensions expert, “the danger now is we will have a generation who really can’t afford to retire”.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 74</div></div><p>Unlike Snyder, he has footnotes, but can&rsquo;t make cases match (in this case, we turns to you).</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The thematic of war recently reached its zenith when Donald Trump said he planned to establish a sixth branch of the armed forces, a “Space Force”.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 85</div></div><p>This type of book is too superficial, with no research to establish context. The book is too short to accommodate anything but a skimming of superficial news sources and clickbait articles. The first mention of a space force was in a strategic document from the nineties, under Clinton. This is not fodder unique to Trump. Trump is copying his predecessors.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;A paper published by the Weizmann Institute of Science conveys the scale of the disaster. Human beings account for 0.01% of all living things since the rise of civilisation. Yet they’ve eradicated 83% of wild animals. Moreover, if we look at the total number of mammals on Earth today, a staggering 60% are livestock, 36% are humans and only 4% remain in the wild. Meanwhile, German researchers discovered that 76% of all flying insects have disappeared in the country since 1989.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 95</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Concerning the latter, radical ecologist Derrick Jensen contends that the only effective way to save the planet is to end civilisation as we know it.14 There can be no happy coexistence between us and nature. It’s a zero-sum game. The best way to rescue the White Bellied Heron, the Baishan Fir, Franklin’s Bumblebee and the Hula painted frog, for example, is to terminate the global capitalist order immediately. As Jensen puts it, “to reverse the effects of civilisation would destroy the dreams of a lot of people. There’s no way around it… what right do I — or does anyone else — have to destroy them? At the same time, what right do they have to destroy the world?”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 97</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The problem is that the worst is yet to come. We therefore require a good understanding of the ideological terrain upon which that struggle will unfold. Most importantly, and returning to the thesis of this book, we won’t necessarily see the clean death of neoliberalism but an exaggerated and unsustainable deepening of it. It will then buckle under its own weight, yielding a windswept post-capitalist dystopia… if nothing is done to counteract it now.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 118</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;This is how Google can enjoy yearly sales in the UK of £1.03bn yet post a pre-tax profit of £149m, with a tax bill of £36.4m. Some firms might even record a “loss” (despite heathy revenues), then use the “Double Irish” with a “Dutch Sandwich”, and pay no tax whatsoever. Combined with shadow banking, transfer pricing, trade misinvoicing and tax havens, here we see where neoliberal capitalism is heading in the end times. The ultra rich — and their phalanx — floating above the state as the public sphere shrinks and society descends into disorder. Moreover, it is precisely here that neo-Feudal social structures make a comeback, linked to family oligarchies and their tremendous influence over governments, bypassing the democratic process.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 137</div></div>      </div>
      </div>
        <div class="footer">
    <div class="footer-data"><div class="footer-links"><ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/contact.php" title="">Contact</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/support.php" title="">Support</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/privacy.php" title="">Privacy</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/rights.php" title="">Rights</a></li></ul></div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="copyright">Copyright (c) 1999-2026 earthli.com. All Rights Reserved.</div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="versions">Powered by <ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore/app_news.php">earthli News 3.7</a></li><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore" title="">earthli WebCore&trade; 3.7</a></li></ul></div></div>    </div>
      </div>
  </div>  </body>
</html>
]]>
  </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
      <title type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[On Tyranny: Twenty Lessons from the Twentieth Century by Ted Snyder (2017) (read in 2019)]]>
  </title>
    <id>https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3721</id>
    <link href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3721"/>
    <updated>2019-04-07T20:11:31+02:00</updated>
    <author>
        <name type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[Marco von Ballmoos]]>
  </name>
      <uri>https://earthli.com/users/marco</uri>
    </author>
      <summary type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<blockquote class="quote abstract "><div>Disclaimer: these are notes I took while reading this book. They include citations I found interesting or enlightening or particularly well-written. In some cases, I&rsquo;ve pointed out which of these applies to which citation; in others, I have not. Any benefit you gain from reading these notes is... [<a class="complete-text-link" href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3721">More</a>]</div></blockquote>]]>
  </summary>
      <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<html lang="en">
  <head>
    <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/themes/ice.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/fonts/raleway.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/core/medium.css">
  </head>
  <body>
<div class="style-controls">  <div class="page">
    <div class="page-body">
<div class="info-box-top">
<p>
Published by <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_user.php?name=marco" title="Marco von Ballmoos" class="visible">marco</a> on <span class="date-time">7. Apr 2019 20:11:31 (GMT-5)</span>
</p>
<p>
Updated by <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_user.php?name=marco" title="Marco von Ballmoos" class="visible">marco</a> on <span class="date-time">25. Oct 2024 06:27:06 (GMT-5)</span>
</p>
</div>
      <div class="text-flow wide">
  <blockquote class="quote abstract "><div>Disclaimer: these are notes I took while reading this book. They include citations I found interesting or enlightening or particularly well-written. In some cases, I&rsquo;ve pointed out which of these applies to which citation; in others, I have not. Any benefit you gain from reading these notes is purely incidental to the purpose they serve of reminding me what I once read. Please see Wikipedia for a summary if I&rsquo;ve failed to provide one sufficient for your purposes. If my notes serve to trigger an interest in this book, then I&rsquo;m happy for you.</div></blockquote><p>This book was recommended to me by an ordinarily more-reliable friend, but I don&rsquo;t hold it against zim. I was relieved to receive a &ldquo;your library loan is about to end&rdquo; message about my E-Book because, as I was reading the book, I realized with dread that I couldn&rsquo;t remember whether I&rsquo;d found it in the library or whether I&rsquo;d actually purchased it. It&rsquo;s a short book, so it probably doesn&rsquo;t cost very much, nor should it, because it&rsquo;s trash.</p>
<p>The blurbs and description of this book are very misleading. It is about Trump. That is not, at first, obvious. Trump is never mentioned by name. Instead, Snyder refers to him as &ldquo;the president&rdquo; in what I can only assume is a bid to seem clever, but ends up being a gambit that fools no-one reading the book <em>right now</em>. In ten or twenty years time, however, absolutely no-one is going to know what the actual fuck Snyder is talking about.</p>
<p>The book is a confusing mish-mash, even when read this close to publication. It will not stand the test of time. Snyder&rsquo;s 20 rules are quite a stretch—many of them are nearly direct reformulations of other rules. They sound different superficially, but are more like a horoscope in that regard.</p>
<p>As I read the book, I thought Snyder was a self-educated 20-something or 70-something. I discovered, after completing the book, that he&rsquo;s a highly ranked professor at the Yale School of Management. It&rsquo;s ridiculous how poorly written and poorly thought-through this book is. He knows his market, though: it&rsquo;s a best-seller.</p>
<h2>Citations</h2><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Because enough people in both cases voluntarily extended their services to the new leaders, Nazis and communists alike realized that they could move quickly toward a full regime change.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 18</div></div><p>There were also rich rewards. They anticipated getting the jump on others.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;No doubt the Russians who voted in 1990 did not think that this would be the last free and fair election in their country’s history, which (thus far) it has been.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 29</div></div><p>Just BOOM, unquestioned and blanket allegations that Russia has no democracy—just declares 30 years of elections as unfair with no justification. That&rsquo;s fucking bold, coming from an American.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The Russian oligarchy established after the 1990 elections continues to function, and promotes a foreign policy designed to destroy democracy elsewhere.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 29</div></div><p>That&rsquo;s another bold claim for an American. Didn&rsquo;t he just write something about vigilance inward rather than outward? But let&rsquo;s broadside the Russians for some cheap and easy points, raw meat to his target audience.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The peasants who had more land or livestock than others were the first to lose what they had. A neighbor portrayed as a pig is someone whose land you can take.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 33</div></div><p>That&rsquo;s another drastic oversimplification. The &ldquo;peasants&rdquo; whereof he speaks were like American agri-business &ldquo;farmers&rdquo; today. They were mostly the vestiges of nobility, hanging on to vast, inherited lands. How do you impose a more just distribution without taking away from those who unjustly hold lands? This is only a huge problem if you sympathize with elites with unearned wealth. Which, spoiler alert, Snyder seems to do.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Millions of people in Soviet Ukraine, Soviet Kazakhstan, and Soviet Russia died horrible and humiliating deaths&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 34</div></div><p>Humiliating is an odd adjective to use here. It insinuates much while explaining nothing. It&rsquo;s a dog whistle.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Even the history of lapel pins is far from innocent.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 35</div></div><p>Again, no mention America&rsquo;s own obsession with ensuring that every single politician has a flag on his or her lapel.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;If lawyers had followed the norm of no execution without trial, if doctors had accepted the rule of no surgery without consent, if businessmen had endorsed the prohibition of slavery, if bureaucrats had refused to handle paperwork involving murder, then the Nazi regime would have been much harder pressed to carry out the atrocities by which we remember it.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 40</div></div><p>But they did resist, no? Then those initial resisters were quickly culled and they were left with the more pliant and morally bankrupt dregs. In typical fashion, we forget all about the anonymous initial resisters and build our own history, own story—one that fits our preconceptions.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;This was a convenient way for Germans to remember the Holocaust, since they could claim that few of them had known exactly what had happened behind those gates.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 49</div></div><p>Fuck this guy for calling how Germans recall the war &ldquo;convenient&rdquo;. Americans have no <em>idea</em> how to recall a war. They never do. Americans are largely deliberately amnesiac and therefore amorally unapologetic about any of the damage and suffering they cause in the world. Germany&rsquo;s culture apologizes to this day for crimes that its forbears committed. American will, in the words of GHW Bush, <span class="quote-inline">&ldquo;never apologize&rdquo;</span>. They don&rsquo;t even acknowledge it, agonizing endlessly about a handful of dead soldiers and whether or not America &ldquo;lost&rdquo; a war—or how to exit an ongoing war while saving face. Apologizing for dead civilians doesn&rsquo;t even make the list. Fuck this guy.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;But even these trials were a kind of minimization of the scale of the crime. Not the SS commanders alone, but essentially all of the thousands of men who served under their command were murderers.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 50</div></div><p>This is literally the reverse of how American military justice works. At least German higher-ups were punished for their war crimes. American higher-ups are rewarded with book deals and roam free, garnering massive speaking fees and morning-show interview spots.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;In summer 1939 the Soviet Union allied with Nazi Germany and the Red Army joined the Wehrmacht in the invasion of Poland. The Polish government chose to fight, activating agreements that brought Great Britain and France into the war. Germany, supplied with food and fuel by the Soviet Union, invaded and quickly occupied Norway, the Netherlands, Belgium, and even France in the spring of 1940. The remainder of the British expeditionary force was evacuated from the&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 53</div></div><p>Is that true? I can&rsquo;t take anything this guy writes on faith anymore.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;From our perspective, her actions seem exceptional. She stood out.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 58</div></div><p>These pat and flat descriptions remind me of the superficiality of Gladwell.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;(the president uses the word in this way), encounters were always struggles (the president&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 60</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;What is the point here? Also, why not write Trump? Is this book only for today? In twenty years it will be very confusing.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 60</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;In 1984, the language of visual media is highly constrained, to starve the public of the concepts needed to think about the present, remember the past, and consider the future. One of the regime’s projects is to limit the language further by eliminating&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 61</div></div><p>Look, this book&rsquo;s heart is obviously in the right place. But it focuses on Trump as if the trend here had just begin. He&rsquo;s not a historian (edit: Holy shit, he&rsquo;s a tenured chair of the history department at Yale University.)</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;If you carry a weapon in public service, may God bless you and keep you.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 47</div></div><p>Some concepts are unassailable in America, no matter where you stand on the publicly acceptable political spectrum.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;It is as if a farmer said he were taking an egg from the henhouse, boiling it whole and serving it to his wife, and also poaching it and serving it to his children, and then returning it to the hen unbroken, and then watching as the chick hatches.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 67</div></div><p>The writing style is one of fake gravitas. Reminds of the train wreck that was the Alchemist. Catchy and trite and calorie-free.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;loved slogans that resonated like a new religion,&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 71</div></div><p>Ironic much? This book is 20 such things.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Subsidize investigative journalism by subscribing to print media.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 72</div></div><p>No no, just media is OK, too. Print media like the New York Times? Or the Washington Post? Two establishment mouthpieces. This guy is an unquestioning fool, a patsy for the ruling elite. As professor at Yale, he kind of <em>is</em> the ruling elite.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;(some of which come from abroad).&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 72</div></div><p>Oh for fucks sake. Here comes the Russia train again.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;During his campaign, the president claimed on a Russian propaganda outlet that American “media has been unbelievably dishonest.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 73</div></div><p>Which fucking outlet was that? Are you <em>literally allergic</em> to any details?</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;In 1971, contemplating the lies told in the United States about the Vietnam War, the political theorist Hannah Arendt took comfort in the inherent power of facts to overcome falsehoods in a free society: “Under normal circumstances the liar is defeated by reality, for which there is no substitute; no matter how large the tissue of falsehood that an experienced liar has to offer, it will never be large enough, even if he enlists the help of computers, to cover the immensity of factuality.” The part about computers is no longer true.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 74</div></div><p>Even then it was already true, even without computers. We never heard about the Vietnam war in school. 100% suppression.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Within the two-dimensional internet world, new collectivities have arisen, invisible by the light of day—tribes with distinct worldviews, beholden to manipulations&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 74</div></div><p>Thesaurus much? By <span class="quote-inline">&ldquo;collectivities&rdquo;</span>, you mean &ldquo;groups&rdquo; and by <span class="quote-inline">&ldquo;beholden&rdquo;</span>, you mean &ldquo;ripe&rdquo;. These aren&rsquo;t even ivory-tower synonyms—they&rsquo;re just wrong.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;If we found a video of the president performing Cossack dances while Vladimir Putin claps, we would probably just demand the same thing with the president wearing a bear suit and holding rubles in his mouth.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 76</div></div><p>He does not see the irony that he accepts Russian evil as axiomatic.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;We find it natural that we pay for a plumber or a mechanic, but demand our news for free. If we did not pay for plumbing or auto repair, we would not expect to drink water or drive cars. Why then should we form our political judgment on the basis of zero investment? We get what we pay for.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 77</div></div><p>Fair point.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Put your body in unfamiliar places with unfamiliar people.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 83</div></div><p>Like orgies? Or Trump rallies?</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;During the campaign of 2016, we took a step toward totalitarianism without even noticing by accepting as normal the violation of electronic privacy.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 88</div></div><p>WTF: surveillance did not start then. This is rewriting history. Snowden came years earlier. The Russian influence is a chimera.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The timed email bombs of the 2016 presidential campaign were also a powerful form of disinformation.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 88</div></div><p>Is he talking about Podesta and Clinton? No idea…what are &ldquo;email bombs&rdquo;?</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;As we learned from these email bombs, this mechanism works even when what is revealed is of no interest.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 90</div></div><p>This book has not aged well. Even after only two years. I have no idea what he&rsquo;s talking about and he&rsquo;s not bothered to explain it at all.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;When we take an active interest in matters of doubtful relevance at moments that are chosen by tyrants and spooks, we participate in the demolition of our own political order. To be sure, we might feel that we are doing nothing more than going along with everyone else. This is true—and it is what Arendt described as the devolution of a society into a “mob.” We can try to solve this problem individually, by securing our own computers; we can also try to solve it collectively, by supporting, for example, organizations that are concerned with human rights.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 90</div></div><p>This paragraph is a crazed mishmash, a kitchen sink/horoscope/shotgun of advice.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;[…] that one of our former presidents called “a thousand points of light.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 93</div></div><p>It was George Bush Sr. You are not being mysterious or generalized by omitting president&rsquo;s names.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;To Ukrainians, Americans seemed comically slow to react to the obvious threats of cyberwar and fake news. When Russian propaganda made Ukraine a target in 2013, young Ukrainian journalists and others reacted immediately, decisively, and sometimes humorously with campaigns to expose disinformation. Russia deployed many of the same techniques against Ukraine that it later used against the United States—while invading Ukraine.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 96</div></div><p>This is nearly an outright fabrication.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;This should give us pause.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 97</div></div><p>This book feels liked it was written with superficial research and no experience and no wisdom. The author is either a 25-year–old or a 70-year–old who never paid attention to anything in his life. It feels like a term paper, right down to the &ldquo;filler&rdquo; content to pad out the already pathetic length of the book. (Edit: again, holy shit, he&rsquo;s a tenured chair of the history department at Yale University.)</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Vladimir Putin not only came to power in an incident that strikingly resembled the Reichstag fire, he then used a series of terror attacks—real, questionable, and fake—to remove obstacles to total power in Russia and to assault democratic neighbors.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 105</div></div><p>What the fuck are you talking about? This is all unverifiable and irrefutable because there is no detail. The Putin-and-Russia-are-evil trope is taken on religious faith. He&rsquo;s writing only for the faithful, and he&rsquo;s so deep into it that he doesn&rsquo;t see the need to provide any substantiation for those of who&rsquo;ve not yet drunk the Kool-Aid.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;When the American president and his national security adviser speak of fighting terrorism alongside Russia, what they are proposing to the American people is terror management: the exploitation of real, dubious, and simulated terror attacks to bring down democracy.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 109</div></div><p>He completely ignores America already having done this, and on a much grander scale. E.g. the Iraq war. It wasn&rsquo;t that long ago. It can be argued that it&rsquo;s still kind of ongoing (soldiers are still stationed there).</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;What is patriotism? Let us begin with what patriotism is not. It is not patriotic to dodge the draft and to mock war heroes and their families. It is not patriotic to discriminate against active-duty members of the armed forces in one’s companies, or to campaign to keep disabled veterans away from one’s property. It is not patriotic to compare one’s search for sexual partners in New York with the military service in Vietnam that one has dodged.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 112</div></div><p>Again: what madness is this? Old man yells at cloud.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Every reference to the past seems to involve an attack by some external enemy upon the purity of the nation.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 121</div></div><p>He&rsquo;s still not seeing the irony, nor has any of his editors seen fit to point it out to him. They are almost certainly all similarly indoctrinated.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;How can we even think of reform when the enemy is always at the gate?&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 124</div></div><p>This from the guy who spent half of a miniscule book railing against foreign devils.</p>
      </div>
      </div>
        <div class="footer">
    <div class="footer-data"><div class="footer-links"><ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/contact.php" title="">Contact</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/support.php" title="">Support</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/privacy.php" title="">Privacy</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/rights.php" title="">Rights</a></li></ul></div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="copyright">Copyright (c) 1999-2026 earthli.com. All Rights Reserved.</div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="versions">Powered by <ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore/app_news.php">earthli News 3.7</a></li><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore" title="">earthli WebCore&trade; 3.7</a></li></ul></div></div>    </div>
      </div>
  </div>  </body>
</html>
]]>
  </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
      <title type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[Norse Mythology by Neil Gaiman (2017) (read in 2019)]]>
  </title>
    <id>https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3720</id>
    <link href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3720"/>
    <updated>2019-04-07T18:21:46+02:00</updated>
    <author>
        <name type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[Marco von Ballmoos]]>
  </name>
      <uri>https://earthli.com/users/marco</uri>
    </author>
      <summary type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<blockquote class="quote abstract "><div>Disclaimer: these are notes I took while reading this book. They include citations I found interesting or enlightening or particularly well-written. In some cases, I&rsquo;ve pointed out which of these applies to which citation; in others, I have not. Any benefit you gain from reading these notes is... [<a class="complete-text-link" href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3720">More</a>]</div></blockquote>]]>
  </summary>
      <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<html lang="en">
  <head>
    <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/themes/ice.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/fonts/raleway.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/core/medium.css">
  </head>
  <body>
<div class="style-controls">  <div class="page">
    <div class="page-body">
<div class="info-box-top">
<p>
Published by <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_user.php?name=marco" title="Marco von Ballmoos" class="visible">marco</a> on <span class="date-time">7. Apr 2019 18:21:46 (GMT-5)</span>
</p>
</div>
      <div class="text-flow wide">
  <blockquote class="quote abstract "><div>Disclaimer: these are notes I took while reading this book. They include citations I found interesting or enlightening or particularly well-written. In some cases, I&rsquo;ve pointed out which of these applies to which citation; in others, I have not. Any benefit you gain from reading these notes is purely incidental to the purpose they serve in reminding me of what I once read. Please see Wikipedia for a summary if I&rsquo;ve failed to provide one sufficient for your purposes. If my notes serve to trigger an interest in this book, then I&rsquo;m happy for you.</div></blockquote><p>This book is Gaiman&rsquo;s retelling of the known Norse legends in his own voice and with his inimitable style. If you pay attention, it doesn&rsquo;t take long to notice that the Norse Gods are mostly jerks to each other and everyone else and have no notion of fairness whatsoever. They are happy to take whatever they can, however they can get it and then the have to gall to hate on Loki for doing it back to them better than they do it to everyone else. Loki is an evil little fuck, but he&rsquo;s no more amoral than the others. It could be argued that he&rsquo;s actually <em>good</em> for wanting to eliminate the manipulative lot of them.</p>
<p>In which I learn that Loki is Thor’s uncle, not his brother. In which I did not even learn that while reading it, but had to have it pointed out to me by my wife after I’d urged her to read this book. On a positive note: I have now learned this thing.</p>
<p>I also learned that Hel is the guardian of the Hel, the destination for everyone who has not earned the right to rest eternally in Valhalla, that Jormungundr is the Midgard serpent (also known as Ouroboros) and that Fenris Wolf is larger than any other creature and is destined to destroy the Gods during Ragnarok. Surtr will help, wielding a world-sized flaming sword. I learned that Fenris, Jormungundr and Hel are Loki&rsquo;s children, making him nearly the most-central character in the whole mythos.</p>
<p>As you can expect from tall tales of this sort, the relative sizes and strengths of the cast varies wildly—each story introduces a new heretofore unknown giant from a heretofore unknown region who is even bigger and more powerful than all other giants before him or her. Thor still manages to kick everyone&rsquo;s ass, though. Thor&rsquo;s fight with the Midgard serpent was particularly confusing vis à vis scale, since that particular serpent goes around the entire <em>world</em>.</p>
<p>Still, super-neat stories, well-told. Would read again.</p>
<h2>Citations</h2><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;In Muspell, at the edge of the flame, where the mist burns into light, where the land ends, stood Surtr, who existed before the gods. He stands there now. He holds a flaming sword, and the bubbling lava and the freezing mist are as one to him. It is said that at Ragnarok, which is the end of the world, and only then, Surtr will leave his station. he will go forth form Muspell with his flaming sword and burn the world with fire, and one by one the gods will fall before him.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 142</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;Odin asked her who would kill Balder, and her answer shocked him.</p>
<p>&ldquo;He asked who would avenge Balder’s death, and her answer puzzled him.</p>
<p>&ldquo;He asked who would mourn Balder, and she stared at him across her own grave, as if she were seeing him for the first time.</p>
<p>&ldquo;“You are not Wanderer,” she said. Her dead eyes flickered, and there was expression on her face. “You are Odin, who was sacrificed by himself to himself so long ago.”</p>
<p>&ldquo;“And you are no wise woman. You are she who was in life Angrboda, Loki’s lover, mother to Hel, to Jormungundr, the Midgard serpent, and to Fenris Wolf,” said Odin. The dead giantess smiled.</p>
<p>&ldquo;“Ride home, little Odin,” she told him. “Run away, run back to your hall. No one will come to see me now until my husband, Loki, escapes from his bonds and returns to me, and Ragnarok, the doom of the gods, tearing all asunder, approaches.”</p>
<p>&ldquo;And then there was nothing in that place but shadows.&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 1989-1996</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;Until now I have told you of things that have happened in the past—things that happened a long time ago.</p>
<p>&ldquo;Now I shall tell you of the days to come. I shall tell you how it will end, and then how it will begin once more.</p>
<p>&ldquo;These are dark days I will tell you of, dark days and hidden things, concerning the ends of the earth and the death of the gods. Listen, and you will learn.&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 2312-2316</div></div>      </div>
      </div>
        <div class="footer">
    <div class="footer-data"><div class="footer-links"><ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/contact.php" title="">Contact</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/support.php" title="">Support</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/privacy.php" title="">Privacy</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/rights.php" title="">Rights</a></li></ul></div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="copyright">Copyright (c) 1999-2026 earthli.com. All Rights Reserved.</div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="versions">Powered by <ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore/app_news.php">earthli News 3.7</a></li><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore" title="">earthli WebCore&trade; 3.7</a></li></ul></div></div>    </div>
      </div>
  </div>  </body>
</html>
]]>
  </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
      <title type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[Eine Kurze Geschichte der Menschheit by Yuval Noah Harari (2011) (read in 2019)]]>
  </title>
    <id>https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3709</id>
    <link href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3709"/>
    <updated>2019-03-10T13:08:00+01:00</updated>
    <author>
        <name type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[Marco von Ballmoos]]>
  </name>
      <uri>https://earthli.com/users/marco</uri>
    </author>
      <summary type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<blockquote class="quote abstract "><div>Disclaimer: these are notes I took while reading this book. They include citations I found interesting or enlightening or particularly well-written. In some cases, I&rsquo;ve pointed out which of these applies to which citation; in others, I have not. Any benefit you gain from reading these notes is... [<a class="complete-text-link" href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3709">More</a>]</div></blockquote>]]>
  </summary>
      <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<html lang="en">
  <head>
    <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/themes/ice.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/fonts/raleway.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/core/medium.css">
  </head>
  <body>
<div class="style-controls">  <div class="page">
    <div class="page-body">
<div class="info-box-top">
<p>
Published by <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_user.php?name=marco" title="Marco von Ballmoos" class="visible">marco</a> on <span class="date-time">10. Mar 2019 13:08:00 (GMT-5)</span>
</p>
</div>
      <div class="text-flow wide">
  <blockquote class="quote abstract "><div>Disclaimer: these are notes I took while reading this book. They include citations I found interesting or enlightening or particularly well-written. In some cases, I&rsquo;ve pointed out which of these applies to which citation; in others, I have not. Any benefit you gain from reading these notes is purely incidental to the purpose they serve of reminding me what I once read. Please see Wikipedia for a summary if I&rsquo;ve failed to provide one sufficient for your purposes. If my notes serve to trigger an interest in this book, then I&rsquo;m happy for you.</div></blockquote><p>This book was originally written in Hebrew—I read the German translation. It&rsquo;s about what the title says: &ldquo;a short history of mankind&rdquo;. The story starts hundreds of thousands of years ago, with Cro-Magnons and Neanderthals, discussing current theories for the diasporas of both and extinction of the latter. From there, we discuss the current theories about hunter-gatherer lifestyle and the &ldquo;cognitive revolution&rdquo; that led to the utter domination of other species by the physically weaker human being. Harari discusses the truly staggering degree to which humans wiped everything else of any significant size—anything that it didn&rsquo;t later domesticate.</p>
<p>Viewed from this high vantage, humans really are a plague, preying on and twisting everything to their will, destroying whatever they cannot subsume.</p>
<p>After that, society transitions to agriculture. Harari points out that every massive change that mankind has accepted and applied to itself globally isn&rsquo;t necessarily an <em>improvement</em>. With agriculture, people were working harder than ever to get a lower-quality life. Congruent with this shift was the beginning of the first elites among men. Though most had lives that were harder and more insecure and more <em>boring</em>—they were increasingly trapped on their lands and lost their nomadic lifestyle—than those of their hunger-gatherer ancestors, a select view lived spectacular lives. These would continue to shape culture and inclinations to ensure that they and their descendants would continue to benefit in this way. Morality didn&rsquo;t enter into it.</p>
<p>Harari has a very western attitude toward humanity—at-times seeming to chastise other cultures for failing to fight back adequately against the more rapacious Europeans. Progress as defined by Europe is taken to be an inevitability—the other countries and peoples of the world are responsible for not having progressed as quickly or more quickly than Europeans. He often has the right facts at hand, but leaves the reader to come to his or her own conclusions. For example, he expresses puzzlement that the Chinese didn&rsquo;t try to blow each other up with gunpowder-based weapons of war <em>for centuries</em> whereas the Europeans did so nearly immediately upon seeing the technology. He implicitly attributes this to westerners somehow being cleverer monkeys when a dearth of morality on their part would also explain the disparity.</p>
<p>The Europeans won because they were more rapacious and cruel and much more ready to consider their fellow humans as lower animals, to be used to satisfy their own abstract needs. Perhaps it was a higher ability to abstract away responsibility under multiple societal layers designed to absolve responsibility—this is a mechanism still heavily used today. Humans set up rules to their own benefit, then explain their overwhelming and grotesque riches as the natural workings of some higher power (i.e. &ldquo;the market&rdquo;). As Harari would say: these are fairy tales we tell ourselves and others to get what we want. That is, in Harari&rsquo;s opinion, humanity&rsquo;s main ability—that fictitious concepts become somehow more important than physical reality.</p>
<p>Harari is a good storyteller and summarizes many interesting facets of the sweep of history. However, he isn&rsquo;t as opinionated as the facts he relates would require him to be. The result is that he looks either obtuse or biased. He shies away from judgment—and he&rsquo;s too smart not to have noticed the natural conclusions to much of the information he cites. My gut feeling in some places was that he was hedging his bets so as to continue to be regarded favorably by the elites whose crimes he has partially documented. That is, he wants to sell his books and his presence, so he leaves the condemnation up to the reader. </p>
<h2>Citations</h2><p>I read this book on paper instead of on my Kindle, so my citations are more limited than usual, as I was only inclined to manually transcribe certain passages. I&rsquo;ve left the passages in German rather than taking the time to translate them to English and about half of my notes are also in German, so YMMV even more than usual.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;Aber woher sollen wir wissen, was auf biologischen Tatsachen beruht und was auf bloßen Mythen? Eine gute Faustregel lautet: &ldquo;Die Biologie erlaubt, die Kultur verbietet.&rdquo; Die Biologie lässt eine große Bandbreite von Möglichkeiten zu. Die Kultur zwingt ihre Angehörigen dagegen, sich für eine kleine Auswahl dieser Möglichkeiten zu entscheiden.. Die Biologie gibt Frauen die Möglichkeit, Kinder zu bekommen – und die Kultur zwingt die Frauen dazu, diese Möglichkeit wahrzunehmen. Die Biologie gibt Männern und Frauen die Möglichkeit, Geschlechtsverkehr mit dem eigenen Geschlecht zu haben – und die Kultur verbietet ihnen, diese Möglichkeit wahrzunehmen.</p>
<p>&ldquo;Die Kultur behauptet gern, sie verbiete &ldquo;unnatürliche&rdquo; Dinge. Aber aus biologischer Sicht ist nichts unnatürlich. Alles was möglich ist, ist definitionsgemäß auch natürlich. Eine unnatürliche Verhaltensweise, die den Gesetzen der Natur widerspricht, kann es gar nicht geben. weshalb es völlig sinnlos ist, sie verbieten zu wollen. Keine Kultur hat sich je die Mühe gemacht, Männern die Photosynthese oder Frauen die Fortbewegung mit Überlichtgeschwindigkeit zu verbieten.&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 184</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Nach der landwirtschaftlichen Revolution wurden die menschlichen Gesellschaften immer größer und komplexer, und die erfundenen Ordnungen, die diese Gesellschaften zusammenhielten, wurden immer raffinierter. Mythen und Märchen programmierten die Menschen darauf, fast von Geburt an auf eine bestimmte Weise zu denken und zu handeln, bestimmte Dinge zu wollen und bestimmte Regeln zu folgen. Damit schufen sie &ldquo;künstliche Instinkte&rdquo;, mit deren Hilfe Millionen von menschen effektiv zusammenarbeiten konnten. Dieses Netz der künstlichen Instinkte nennen wir &ldquo;Kultur&rdquo;.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 201</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;Ein interessanter Fall sind die Nationalgerichte. Wenn wir in ein italienisches Restaurant gehen, erwarten wir Spaghetti mit Tomatensoße, bei polnischen und irischen Restaurants denken wir spontan an Kartoffeln, in einem argentinischen Restaurant wollen wir saftige Rindersteaks essen, in indischen Restaurants freuen wir uns auf kräftig mit Chili gewürzte Currygerichte, und in einem Schweizer Café auf die heiße Schokolade. Aber der Kakao kommt ursprünglich genauso wenig aus der Schweiz wit die Tomaten aus Italien oder die Chilischoten aus Indien. Tomaten, Chili und Kakao stammen aus Mesoamerika und kamen erst im 16. Jahrhundert, nach der Eroberung des Aztekenreichs durch die Spanier, nach Europa und Asien.</p>
<p>&ldquo;[…]</p>
<p>&ldquo;Genauso kennen wir aus Hollywood-Filmen nordamerikanische Indianer al tapfere Reiter, die sich mutig den Planwagen der europäischen Pioniere Entgegenwerfen, um di Kultur ihrer Ahnen zu verteidigen. Doch diese Reiter waren keineswegs die Vertreter einer uralten, ursprünglichen Kultur. Sie waren vielmehr das Produkt einer gewaltigen militärischen und politischen Revolution, die im 17. und 18. Jahrhundert mit der Ankunft der europäischen Pferde über den Westen Nordamerikas hinwegfegte. Im Jahr 1492 gab es in ganz Amerika kein einziges Pferd. So attraktiv uns die Kultur der Sioux und Apachen des 19. Jahrhunderts erscheinen mag, sie war keine &ldquo;ursprünglich&rdquo; sondern eine sehr modernen Kultur, die unter der Einwirkung globaler Kräfte entstanden war.&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">209</div></div><p>On the difficulties of having a barter-only economy:</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;Um sich die Grenzen des Tauschhandels klarzumachen, stellen Sie sich vor, Sie wohnen in den Bergen und haben einen Garten mit Apfelbäumen, in dem die knackigsten, saftigsten Äpfel der ganzen Gegend wachsen. Von der vielen Arbeit in Ihrem Garten gehen irgendwann Ihre Schuhe kaputt. Also spannen Sie Ihren Esel vor Ihren Karren und fahren in den Marktflecken am Fluss. ihr Nachbar hat Ihnen erzählt, dass ihm der Schuhmacher auf der Südseite des Markts ein Paar Stiefel gemacht hat, die fünf Jahre lang gehalten haben. Diesen Schuster besuchen Sie nun und bieten ihm an, einige Ihrer Äpfel gegen ein Paar Schuhe zu tauschen.</p>
<p>&ldquo;Der Schuhmacher zögert. Wi viel Äpfel soll er für ein Paar Schuhen nehmen? Jede Woche kommen Dutzende Kunden zu ihm, von denen einer einen Sack Äpfel, ein zweiter Weizen, ein dritter Ziegen und ein vierter Stoffe mitbringt, und zwar jeder in ganz unterschiedlicher Qualität. Dann hat er auch noch Kunden, die Bittschreiben an den König aufsetzen oder Rückenschmerzen kurieren können. Als ihm das letzte Mal jemand Äpfel geboten hat, hat er sich drei Säcke geben lassen. Oder waren se vier? Aber das waren ja auch die sauren Äpfel aus dem Tal gewesen. Andererseits hat er damals auch nur ein kleines Paar Frauenschuhe hergestellt, und Sie wollen ja robuste Stiefel. Dazu kommt, dass in den letzten Wochen eine Epidemie die Schafe in der Gegend dezimiert hat und Häute selten geworden sind. Die Gerber verlangen inzwischen doppelt so viele Paar fertige Schuhe für dieselbe Menge Leder. Sollte der Schuster das nicht irgendwie einkalkulieren?</p>
<p>&ldquo;In einer Tauschwirtschaft müssen Sie under der Schuhmacher jeden Tag den relativen Wert von Duzenden Waren ermitteln. Wenn in Ihrer Stadt 100 Waren gehandelt werden, müssen Käufer und Verkäufer 4950 verschiede Wechselkurse kennen. Und wenn 1000 Waren gehandelt werden, wären dies schon 499 500 Wechselkurse! Wie sollen Sie da den Überblick bewahren?&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 216</div></div><p>On the global distribution of certain norms and rules:</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Heute gibt es fast 200 unabhängige Staaten, doch mit deren Souveränität ist es nicht mehr allzu weit her. Keiner dieser Staaten ist mehr in der Lage, eine eigenständige Wirtschaftspolitik zu gestalten oder nach Lust und Laune Kriege zu führen; nicht einmal ihre inneren Angelegenheiten können sie nach Gutdünken regeln. Die Nationalstaaten sind zunehmend der Spielball von Weltmärkten, Großkonzernen und internationalen Nichtregierungsorganisationen, side werden von der Weltöffentlichkeit mit Argusaugen beobachtet und unterstehen dem internationalen Rechtssystem. Sie müssen ihre Finanzgebaren, ihre Umweltpolitik und ihr Rechtssystem an internationalen Vorgaben ausrichten. Die Welt wird von mächtigen internationalen Kapital-, Arbeits- und Informationsströmen gestaltet, die sich zunehmend über nationale Grenzen und Meinungen hinwegsetzen.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 252</div></div><p>On the false belief in an inevitability of history:</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Der einzige Gott, den die Römer lange Zeit nicht duldeten, war der monotheistische und missionierende Gott der Christen. Die Römer verlangten gar nicht, dass die Christen ihren Glauben aufgaben, sie erwarteten nur, dass sie die römischen Götter und die Göttlichkeit des Kaisers anerkannten. Erst als die Christen sich weigerten und keine Kompromisse eingehen wollten, verfolgten die Römer diese Minderheit, und auch nur, weil sie in ihr eine politische Bedrohung sahen. Doch selbst dann gingen sie eher halbherzig gegen die Rebellen vor. In den drei Jahrhunderten, die zwischen der Kreuzigung Jesu Christi und der Bekehrung von Kaiser Konstantin vergingen, befahlen die römischen Kaiser lediglich vier organisierte Christenverfolgungen. Hin und wieder führten zwar Provinzstatthalter und Gouverneure auf eigene Faust Pogrome durch. Doch wenn man sämtliche Opfer aller Christenverfolgungen zusammenrechnet, stellt man fest, dass die polytheistischen Römer in diesen drei Jahrhunderten lediglich einige Tausend Christen ermordeten. Zum Vergleich: In den kommenden anderthalb Jahrtausenden schlachteten sich die Christen gegenseitig zu Millionen ab, weil sie die Lehre der Nächstenliebe in einigen Detailfragen unterschiedlich interpretierten.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 261</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;Wenn eine Religion ein System von Werten und Normen ist, das sich auf eine übermenschliche Ordnung beruft, dann ist der Kommunismus genauso eine Religion wie der Islam.</p>
<p>&ldquo;Natürlich gibt es einen Unterschied zwischen dem islam und dem Kommunismus, denn der Islam ist der Ansicht, dass diese übermenschliche Ordnung von einem allmächtigen Gott geschaffen wurde, während der Kommunismus nicht an Götter glaubt. Aber auch der Buddhismus hält nicht allzu viel von Göttern und wird trotzdem gemeinhin al Religion bezeichnet. Wie die Buddhisten glaubten die Kommunisten, die Geschichte werde von einer übermenschlichen Ordnung von unumstößlichen Naturgesetzen gelenkt, aus denen sich wiederum Regeln für das menschliche Verhalten ableiten. Während die Buddhisten glauben, dass Siddhartha Gautama diese Gesetze entdeckt hatte, sehen Kommunisten Karl Marx, Friedrich Engels und Wladimir Illjitsch Lenin als ihre Religionsstifter.&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 278</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;Als Kaiser Konstantin im Jahr 306 den Thron bestieg, war das Christentum nicht mehr als eine esoterische Sekte aus dem Nahen Osten. Die Vorstellung, dass sie kurz davor stand, das Römische Reich zu erobern, war genauso lachhaft wie der Gedanke, Hare Krishna könnte in fünfzig Jahren die Staatsreligion Europas werden. Im Oktober 1913 waren die russischen Bolschewiken eine unbedeutende Gruppe von Radikalen – niemand hätte sein Geld darauf gewettet, dass ein Volk aus der arabischen Wüste ein Imperium erobern würde, das vom Atlantik bis zum Indischen Ozean reichte. Wenn die Araber gleich zu Beginn ihres Siegeszugs von der Byzantinischen Armee gestoppt worden wären, dann wäre der Islam eine unbedeutende Fußnote der Geschichte geblieben, und die wenigen Experten, die von ihm gehört hatten, würden uns heute mit dem Brustton der Überzeugung erklären, warum aus den Offenbarungen eines Alternden Handelsreisenden aus Mekka niemals eine Weltreligion werden konnte.</p>
<p>&ldquo;[…] Der Determinismus ist verführerisch, denn er vermittelt uns das Gefühl, dass unsere Welt und unsere Vorstellungen ein natürliches und unvermeidliches Produkt der Geschichte sind. Demnach gäbe es gar keine andere Möglichkeit, als die Welt in Nationalstaaten aufzuteilen, die Wirtschaft nach kapitalistischen Grundsätzen zu organisieren und an die Menschenrechte zu glauben. Wenn wir jedoch erkenne, dass die Geschichte nicht in vorgegebenen Bahnen verläuft, dann müssen wir uns eingestehen, dass Nationalismus, Kapitalismus und Menschenrechte nicht mehr sind als Zufallsprodukte.&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 292</div></div><p>On second-order chaotic systems (those that can&rsquo;t be predicted because the prediction influences the working of the system):</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;Stellen Sie sich vor, im Jahr 2010 erfindet ein genialer Politikwissenschaftler zusammen mit einem Informatiker ein unfehlbares Programm zur Vorhersage von Revolutionen und verkauft es dem ägyptischen Präsidenten Hosni Mubarak. Neugierig probiert der Präsident das neue Spielzeug aus und stellt erschrocken fest, dass es eine Revolution für das kommende Jahr vorausberechnet. Sofort senkt Mubarak die Steuern, verteilt Milliarden unter sein Volk und verstärkt für alle Fälle seine Geheimpolizei. So kommt und geht das Jahr 2011, ohne dass Demonstranten auf die Straße gehen. ärgerlich beschwert sich Mubarak bei den Entwicklern des Programms und verlangt sein Geld zurück. &ldquo;Euer Programm hat sich verrechnet! Es hat mich Milliarden gekostet! Im Jahr 2011 gab es gar keine Revolution!&rdquo;</p>
<p>&ldquo;Worauf die Experten erwidern: &ldquo;Wir haben Sie gerettet! Ohne uns säßen Sie heute im Gefängnis!&rdquo;</p>
<p>&ldquo;&ldquo;Propheten, die Dinge vorhersehen, die dann nicht eintreten?&rdquo;, fragt Mubarak und winkt seine Wachen heran. &ldquo;Von der Sorte hätte ich Dutzende auf dem Markt aufsammeln können, und zwar umsonst!&rdquo;&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 294</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Im Jahr 1500 lebten 500 Millionen Menschen auf unserem Planeten. Heute sind es 7 Milliarden. Im Jahr 1500 wurden auf der ganzen Welt Waren und Dienstleistungen im Wert von umgerechnet 250 Milliarden Dollar. produziert. Heute sind es knapp 60 Billionen Dollar. Im Jahr 1500 verbrauchte die Menschheit pro Tag 13 Billionen Kalorien Energie. Heute verbrauchen wir pro Tag 1500 Billionen Kalorien. (Lassen Sie diese Zahlen einmal auf sich wirken: 14 mal so viele Menschen produzieren 240 mal so viel und verbrauchen dabei 115 mal so viel Energie.)&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 301</div></div><p>On the religion of technology and the unshakable faith of the technocracy.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;Selbst die Wissenschaft greift immer wieder auf religiöse und ideologische Überzeugungen zurück, um ihre Forschung zu rechtfertigen und zu finanzieren.</p>
<p>&ldquo;Trotzdem zeigt unsere moderne Kultur größere Bereitschaft als jede andere, ihre Unwissenheit anzuerkennen. Wenn die Moderne ihre gesellschaftliche Ordnung trotz der neuen Mode des Zweifels aufrechterhalten konnte, dann liegt das vor allem daran, dass eine fast religiöse Technologie- und Wissenschaftsgläubigkeit aufkam, die den Glauben an absolute Wahrheiten weitgehend verdrängt hat.&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 310</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Wir leben in einem Zeitalter der Technologie. Was für unsere Vorfahren politische, ethische und spirituelle Zwickmühlen waren, das behandeln wir zunehmend als technische Fragen. Mit ihren erstaunlichen erfolgen im Kampf gegen Blitzschlag, Armut und Tod hat uns die Wissenschaft zu begeisterten Fortschrittsgläubigen gemacht. Viele sind überzeugt, dass sie &ldquo;zum Nutzen der Menschheit&rdquo; arbeitet und wir ihr rückhaltlos vertrauen können. Lassen wir die Wissenschaftler nur ihre Arbeit machen, und sie werden das Paradies auf Erden schaffen, denken sie.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 330</div></div><p>On how scientific advancement that benefitted Europeans was the kiss of death for everyone else. Cook&rsquo;s faith in Dr. Lind&rsquo;s cure for scurvy saved millions of western sailors&rsquo; lives—freeing them up to slaughter and yoke the other peoples of the planet.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;[…] Auf der gesamten Expedition starb kein einziger seiner Matrosen an Skorbut. In den folgenden Jahrzehnten machten es die Flotten der Welt Cook nach und retteten so das Leben von ungezählten Matrosen und Reisenden.</p>
<p>&ldquo;[Cooks] Expedition legte den Grundstein für die britische Besetzung des Südwestpazifiks, die Eroberung Australiens, Tasmaniens und Neuseelands, die Besiedlung der neuen Kolonien durch Millionen von Europäern und die Auslöschung der einheimischen Kulturen und der meisten Ureinwohner.</p>
<p>&ldquo;Im Jahrhundert nach Cooks Expedition nahmen europäische Siedler den Ureinwohnern Australiens und Neuseelands den größten Teil des fruchtbaren Landes ab. Die einheimische Bevölkerung brach um 90 Prozent ein, und die wenigen Überlebenden wurden von einem erbarmungslosen rassistischen System unterjocht. Für die australischen Aborigines und die neuseeländischen Maoris markierte die Cook-Expedition den Beginn einer Katastrophe, von der sie sich nie wieder völlig erholten.</p>
<p>&ldquo;Noch schlimmer erging es den Ureinwohnern von Tasmanien. {…}&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Es ist nicht so, als hätte den Chinesen und Persern das technische Knowhow gefehlt – Dampfmaschinen ließen sich schließlich ganz einfach kaufen oder nachbauen. Was ihnen fehlte, waren die Werte und Mythen, der juristische Apparat und die gesellschaftlichen und politischen Strukturen, die im Westen über Jahrhunderte hinweg herangereift waren und sich nicht so einfach kopieren und verinnerlichen ließen. Frankreich und die Vereinigten Staaten konnten rasch in die Fußstapfen von Großbritannien treten, weil di Franzosen und Amerikaner viele Mythen und Gesellschaftsstrukturen mit den Briten gemeinsam hatten. Die Chinesen und Perser konnten nicht Schritt halten, weil sie ganz anders dachten und sich anders organisierten.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 344</div></div><p>Oder vielleicht fehlt diese Kulturen die Impulse zu Erobern, Auslöschen und Unterjochung, die den Europäern so leicht gefallen ist. Vielleicht stunde die Ethik und Moralen im Weg. Vielleicht war&rsquo;s einfach die Tatsache, dass das was die Europäer erfunden haben war gepaart mit dem was jedem Bully bewusst ist: die die nicht kämpfen wollen werden verlieren. Dem Westen aus dem Weg zu gehen ist nicht möglich, weil die nicht aufzuhalten sind, bis sie die ganze Welt aufgefressen haben. Nach Jahrhunderte der Unterwerfung haben die andere Länder endlich begriffen, dass man muss den Feind werden, um ihn zu besiegen. ist schade aber scheint so zu sein.</p>
<p>Die Erklärung von Harari wirkt sehr komisch, wenn man erinnert, dass diese obereffiziente Europäer haben die Welt nur leid verbreitet und sämtliche menschliche Bevölkerungen ausgelöscht und unterjocht (genau wie ihre Vorfahren die Grosssäugetiere entweder ausgelöscht oder unterjocht haben). Seine Sätze lassen sich lesen, als ob die Europäer auch durch eine moralische Linse betrachtet hätten gewinnen sollen—aus meiner Sicht stimmt das überhaupt nicht. Die haben gewonnen, weil ihre Rassismus und Brutalität überstieg alles andere was ihnen begegnet ist.</p>
<p>Dass die andere Kulturen sich <span class="quote-inline">&ldquo;anders dachten und sich anders organisierten&rdquo;</span> ist heute noch so: die scheinen irgendwie noch einem Hauch Ethik zu befolgen. Hingegen findet das neue herrschende Land der Welt—Amerika—es muss keineswegs an solche Schwächlichkeiten überhaupt festhalten. Ganz im Gegenteil: ausgesprochene Ethiken haben nachdem sie über den lügnerischen Lippen gesabbert sind keine Bedeutung mehr. Obwohl die noch etliche Hinrichtungen durchführen (so wie auch Amerika), die Iraner scheinen an irgendwelche Werten noch festzuhalten, dass die immer wieder in die Verliererolle gegenüber Amerika führen.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Von Beginn an waren die europäischen Entdeckungsfahrten immer auch Eroberungszüge, und umgekehrt. Das macht die Einmaligkeit des europäischen Imperialismus aus. Frühere Imperialisten nahmen an, dass sie die Welt bereits völlig verstanden. Bei der Eroberung nutzten sie lediglich <em>ihre</em> Sicht der Welt und verbreiteten sie. Die Araber eroberten Ägypten, Spanien oder Indien nicht, weil sie dort etwas entdecken wollten, das sie noch nicht kannten. Die Römer, Mongolen und Azteken verleibten sich gierig immer neue Völker und Stämme ein, um Macht und Reichtümer zu horten, aber nicht um Wissen zu finden. Europäische Imperialisten brachen dagegen in ferne Länder auf, um sich nicht nur neue Länder anzueignen, sondern auch neues Wissen.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 347</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Nun kamen mehr und mehr spanische Soldaten und Siedler nach Mexiko, einige aus Kuba, andere direkt aus Spanien. Als die Einheimischen erkannten, was gespielt wurde, war es bereits zu spät. Hundert Jahre nach der Landung der Spanier in Veracruz war die Zahl der Ureinwohner um 90 Prozent eingebrochen. Die wenigen überlebenden Indios wurden von einem gierigen, rassistischen Regime versklavt, das die Unterdrückung durch die Azteken weit in den Schatten stellte.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 361</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Ist das Ganze also ein riesiges Schneeballsystem und ein riesiger Schwindel? Wenn ja, dann ist die gesamte moderne Wirtschaft ein Schwindel.  Aber Jahrhunderte des realen Wirtschaftswachstums lassen vermuten, dass es sich nicht um einen Betrug handelt, sondern um eine Meisterleistung der menschlichen Fantasie. Banken und damit die ganze Wirtschaft funktionieren nur, weil wir Vertrauen in die Zukunft haben. Der Wert unseres Geldes ist fast ausschließlich durch dieses Vertrauen gedeckt.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 376</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Dieser Glaube an den immer größer werdenden Kuchen entwickelte eine gewaltige Sprengkraft. Im Jahr 1776 veröffentlichte der schottische Philosoph Adam Smith sein Buch <em>Wohlstand der Nationen</em>, das vielleicht wichtigste wirtschaftliche Manifest aller Zeiten. In den acht Kapiteln des ersten Bandes entwickelte Smith folgenden neuen Gedankengang: Wenn ein Landbesitzer, Weber oder Schuhmacher größere Gewinne erwirtschaftet, als er zum Unterhalt seiner Familie benötigt, dann nutzt er diesen Überschuss, um mehr Mitarbeiter zu beschäftigen und seine Gewinne weiter zu steigern. Je mehr Gewinne er erwirtschaftet, umso mehr Mitarbeiter beschäftigt er. Daraus folgt, dass die Gewinnsteigerung von Unternehmern die Grundlage für den kollektiven Wohlstand ist.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 381</div></div><p>Hier habe ich meine Zweifel, dass Harari das Buch von Smith nicht nur oberflächlich gelesen hat. Ich hab&rsquo;s auch nur zum Teil gelesen (etwa die Hälfte—zu meine Verteidigung, es ist öde Langweilig) aber mein Eindruck war, dass Smith weniger positiv über die Wirtschaftskurbel berichtete bzw. er hat die von Harari zitierten Sätze klar geschrieben, folgte die aber mit ziemlich heftige Dementierungen, die von Harari nicht zitiert waren. Smith ist hier als Paradebeispiel eines Liberalen Wirtschaftlers, war aber eher links eingestellt, um grossen und ganzen. Hier steht Harari nicht allein: die meiste Zitieren Smith falsch oder so gezielt, dass falsche Meinungen gebildet werden.</p>
<p>Später stellt Harari selber fragen, ob die oben zitierte Vision von Smith jemals so gelaufen ist.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Mit Beginn der Neuzeit wurde der Adel von einer neuen Elite abgelöst, deren Angehörige wahre Gläubige der kapitalistischen Religion waren. Diese neue Elite bestand nicht aus Grafen und Baronen, sondern aus Aufsichtsratsvorsitzenden, Aktienhändlern und industriellen. Diese Magnaten sind reicher als der mittelalterliche Adel, aber anders als ihre verschwenderischen Vorgänger haben sie weniger Interesse daran, ihr Geld zur Schau zu stellen, und verprassen nun einen kleinen Teil ihrer Gewinne.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 383</div></div><p>Schon wieder muss ich Harari bezweifeln. Es ist richtig, dass nouveau-riche so viel Geld besitzen, dass die es gar nicht verprassen könne—bzw. die Zinsen davon häufen sich so schnell an, dass das Geldhaufen wachst egal wie viel man ausgibt. Diese liegt sicher nicht, weil sie sich kein Mühe dabei geben.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;Doch in China, Indien und der Islamischen Welt spielten Kredit und Kapitalismus nur eine untergeordnete Rolle. </p>
<p>&ldquo;[…]</p>
<p>&ldquo;In Europa machten sich die Könige und Generäle dagegen das kaufmännische Denken zu eigen, bis die Händler und Bankiers schließlich selbst zur herrschenden Elite wurden. Die europäische Eroberung der Welt wurde immer mehr über Kredite und immer weniger über Steuern finanziert, und sie wurde zunehmend von Kapitalisten gelenkt, die vor allem daran interessiert waren, ihre Erträge zu maximieren.&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 386</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Als die VOC im Jahr 1603 erstmals nach Indonesien kam, verfolgte sie ausschließlich wirtschaftliche Interessen. Doch um diese zu sichern und die Gewinne ihrer Aktionäre zu maximieren, gingen die Händler der VOC bald gegen die Potentaten der Region vor, <strong>die überhöhte Zölle verlangten</strong>, und sie wehrten sich gegen ihre europäischen Konkurrenten. Die VOC rüstete ihre Handelsschiffe mit Kanonen aus, heuerte europäische, japanische, indische und indonesische Söldner on, errichtete, Festungen, gelagerte Städte und führte Kriege. <strong>So sehr und dies heute befremden mag</strong>, es war keine außergewöhnliche Idee.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 393</div></div><p>Das nennt sich auf Englisch &ldquo;Gunboat Diplomacy&rdquo; … oder vielleicht &ldquo;Gunboat Trade&rdquo; in diesem Fall. Wir werden das heute ganz klar verstehen (im Gegensatz zur Meinung von Harari), weil die Westliche Länder heute genauso handeln wie damals. Es hat sich kaum etwas geändert. Wenn wir einen Grund finden—oder erfinden—können (so wie <span class="quote-inline">&ldquo;überhöhte Zölle&rdquo;</span>, wird&rsquo;s losgestürmt, mit moralische Begründung (die Fremden sind selber schuld, dass sie zu viel Geld verlangten und wohnen schliesslich auf von Gott gegebenen, westlichen Grund).</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Von ihrem Hauptquartier in der Leadenhall Street in London herrschte [die <em>Britisch East India Company</em>] mehr als ein Jahrhundert lang über ein gewaltiges indisches Reich und unterhielt ein Heer, das mit 350 000 Soldaten größer war als das der britischen Krone. erst im Jahr 1858 wurde Indien zusammen mit der Armee des Unternehmens &ldquo;verstaatlicht&rdquo;.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 396</div></div><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;In der ersten Hälfte des 19. Jahrhunderts verdienten die Britische Ostindiengesellschaft und die Geschäftsleute der Insel ein Vermögen mit dem Verkauf von Drogen nach China. […] Ende der 1830er Jahre verbot die chinesische Regierung den Drogenhandel. Da die britischen Drogenhändler das Verbot einfach ignorierten, begannen die chinesischen Behörden damit, die Rauschmittel zu beschlagnahmen und zu vernichten.</p>
<p>&ldquo;[…]</p>
<p>&ldquo;Im Jahr 1840 erklärte Großbritannien China im Namen des &ldquo;Freihandels&rdquo; den Krieg. […] Im folgenden Friedensvertrag erklärten sich die Chinesen bereit, die Aktivitäten der britischen Drogenhändler nicht weiter zu behindern. <strong>Sie zahlten sogar noch Reparationen für den wirtschaftlichen Schaden, den die chinesische Polizei bei der Vernichtung der Drogen angerichtet hatte, und überließen den Briten Hongkong,</strong> das den Drogenhändlern fortan als sicherer Stützpunkt diente.&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;[…] Nach der Schlacht von Navarino waren die britischen Kapitalisten zunehmend bereit, in zweifelhafte Auslandsgeschäfte zu investieren. Wenn die Schuldner die Zahlung verweigerten, konnten side schließlich davon ausgehen, dass die britische Armee ihnen ihr Geld schon zurückholen würde.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 399</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Doch die Zuckerrohrernte und die Zuckerherstellung sind extrem arbeitsintensiv. Niemand wollte freiwillig den ganzen Tag auf malariaverseuchten Feldern und unter der erbarmungslosen tropischen Sonne arbeiten. Wenn die Pflanzer Lohnarbeiter beschäftigt hätten, dann wäre der Preis exorbitant hoch geblieben und die Süßwarenindustrie hätte es vermutlich nie gegeben. Mit ihrem Marktgespür und ihrer Profitgier stellten die europäischen Plantagenbesitzer also auf Sklavenwirtschaft um.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 403</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Der Sklavenhandel wurde nicht von Regierungen kontrolliert. Es handelte sich um eine rein wirtschaftliche Unternehmung, die auf dem freien Markt nach dem Gesetz von Angebot und Nachfrage organisiert und finanziert wurde. Private Sklavenhandelsunternehmen verkauften Aktien an den Börsen von Amsterdam, Paris und London. Wohlsituierte europäische Bürger, die eine retable Geldanlage suchten, kauften diese Aktien. Mit ihrem Geld erwarben die Sklavenhändler Schiffe, heuerten Matrosen und Soldaten an, kauften in Afrika Sklaven und transportierten sie nach Amerika. Dort verkauften sie diese an Plantagenbesitzer und mit dem Ertrag kauften sie Plantagenprodukte wie Zucker, Kakao, Kaffee, Tabak und Baumwolle Wieder in Europa, verkauften sie Zucker und Baumwolle zu einem guten Preis und segelten dann wieder nach Afrika, um das Spiel von vorn zu beginnen. Die Aktionäre warn zufrieden. Im 18. Jahrhundert erzielten Sklavenaktien eine jährliche Rendite von run 6 Prozent – das war ausgesprochen gut, wie ein moderner Anlageberater sofort zugeben würde.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 403–404</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;Ist die Moderne also eine Ära des Krieges und der Unterdrückung, symbolisiert durch die Schützengräben des Ersten Weltkriegs, den Atompilz über Hiroshima oder die hasserfüllten Gesichter von Hitler und Stalin? Oder ist es eine Ära des Friedens, symbolisiert durch die Schützengräben, die sich nie durch Südamerika zogen, die Atompilze, die nie über New York und Moskau schwebten und die friedlichen Gesichter von Mahatma Gandhi und Martin Luther king?</p>
<p>&ldquo;Das kommt darauf an, von welchem Moment aus man diese Frage beantwortet. Wir müssen uns eingestehen, dass unsere Einschätzung der Vergangenheit immer durch die Ereignisse der zurückliegenden Jahre verzerrt wird. Wenn dieses Kapitel im Jahr 1945 oder 1962 geschrieben worden wäre, dann hätte es vermutlich einen sehr pessimistischen Ton angeschlagen. Da es im Jahr 2013 geschrieben wurde, sieht es die moderne Geschichte sehr viel optimistischer.&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 457</div></div><p>Natürlich kann die Geschichte viel rosiger betrachten, wenn man nicht nur &ldquo;verzerrt&rdquo;, sondern schlichtweg ausblendet. Es gab in Südamerika keine Schützengräben sondern einen Putsch nach dem anderen und Amerikanische Unterstützung für rechtsextreme Faschisten in fast alle Länder des Kontinents. Die Weltanschauung von Harati nimmt die letze 60 Jahren von westlichen Eingriffe und Angriffe gar nicht war.  Er scheint zu glauben, dass die Geschichte der Menschheit nach dem zweiten Weltkrieg nur eine florierende Zukunft immer näher kommt. Der Neoliberalismus hat besiegt und schenkt und nur eine goldene Welt—natürlich nur für die wichtigste Menschen.</p>
<p>Harari scheint hier in seine Geschichte eine Lücke zu bauen, wodurch die amerikanische Kriegsmaschine von ihm unangetastet durchfahren kann. Wolle er zusichern, dass er Bücher in den Staaten verkaufen könnte?</p>
<p>Andererseits schreibt er Absätze wir der folgende:</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Und zweitens ist durchaus denkbar, dass diese kurze Glückssträhne die Saat für eine kommende Katastrophe gelegt hat. In den zurückliegenden Jahrzehnten haben wir das ökologische Gleichgewicht des Planeten auf verschiedenste Weise gestört, und niemand kann die Konsequenzen absehen. Es gibt viele Anzeichen dafür, dass wir gerade im Begriff sind, in einer Orgie des gedankenlosen Konsums die Grundlage unseres Wohlstands zu verprassen.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 462</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Der Frankenstein-Mythos konfrontiert den <em>Homo Sapiens</em> damit, dass seine Tage bald gezählt sein werden. Wenn nicht ein Atomkrieg oder eine Umweltkatastrophe [beide sind immer mehr möglich. Bemerkung der Redaktion] dazwischenkommt, wird die rasante technologische Entwicklung bald dazu führen, dass der <em>Homo sapiens</em> von einem gänzlich anderen Wesen abgelöst wird, das nicht nur einen anderen Körper mitbringt, sondern in einer anderen kognitiven und emotionalen Welt lebt. […] Wir glauben gern, dass in Zukunft Menschen wie wir in Raumschiffen von einem Planeten zum anderen düsen. Wir denken nicht gern darüber nach, dass es in Zukunft keine Wesen mit unseren Emotionen oder Identitäten mehr geben könnte und dass fremde Lebensformen an unsere Stelle treten, die uns mit ihren Fähigkeiten weit in den Schatten stellen.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 503</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;Vor 70 000 Jahren war der <em>Homo sapiens</em> ein unbedeutendes Tier, das in einer abgelegenen Ecke Afrikas seinem Leben nachging. In den folgenden Jahrtausenden stieg es zum Herrscher des gesamten Planeten auf und wurde zum schrecken des Ökosystems. Heute steht es kurz davor, zum Gott zu werden und nicht nur die ewige Jugend zu gewinnen, sondern auch göttliche Macht über Leben und Tod.</p>
<p>&ldquo;Leider hat die Herrschaft des Sapiens bislang wenig hinterlassen, aus das wir uneingeschränkt stolz sein könnten. Wir haben uns die Umwelt untertan gemacht, unsere Nahrungsproduktion gesteigert, Städte gebaut, Weltreiche gegründet und Handelsnetze errichtet. Aber haben wir das Leid in der Welt gelindert_ Wieder und wieder bedeuteten die massiven Machtzuwächse der Menschheit keine Verbesserung für die einzelnen Menschen und immenses Leid für andere Lebewesen.&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 507</div></div><p>Harari schwebt zwischen eine nüchterne Anerkennung von den vor der Menschheit stehenden Problemen und eine blinde Optimismus. Wir werden wohl kaum Götter werden—zumindest nicht mehr als eine kleine Bruchteil von der oberen Schicht.</p>
      </div>
      </div>
        <div class="footer">
    <div class="footer-data"><div class="footer-links"><ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/contact.php" title="">Contact</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/support.php" title="">Support</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/privacy.php" title="">Privacy</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/rights.php" title="">Rights</a></li></ul></div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="copyright">Copyright (c) 1999-2026 earthli.com. All Rights Reserved.</div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="versions">Powered by <ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore/app_news.php">earthli News 3.7</a></li><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore" title="">earthli WebCore&trade; 3.7</a></li></ul></div></div>    </div>
      </div>
  </div>  </body>
</html>
]]>
  </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
      <title type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[Three nice stories]]>
  </title>
    <id>https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3654</id>
    <link href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3654"/>
    <updated>2019-01-07T23:26:06+01:00</updated>
    <author>
        <name type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[Marco von Ballmoos]]>
  </name>
      <uri>https://earthli.com/users/marco</uri>
    </author>
      <summary type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<p><a href="https://www.theparisreview.org/blog/2018/12/17/one-missing-piece/">One Missing Piece</a> by <cite>Jill Talbot</cite> (<cite><a href="http://www.theparisreview.org/">The Paris Review</a></cite>) is the story of a chronically peripatetic woman and her daughter. The story is specifically about a road-trip from Texas to Camden, NY, returning to place they&rsquo;d lived for 3 years, full of memories.</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Every September or October, my father took me to the State Fair of Texas in... [<a class="complete-text-link" href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3654">More</a>]&rdquo;</div></blockquote>]]>
  </summary>
      <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<html lang="en">
  <head>
    <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/themes/ice.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/fonts/raleway.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/core/medium.css">
  </head>
  <body>
<div class="style-controls">  <div class="page">
    <div class="page-body">
<div class="info-box-top">
<p>
Published by <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_user.php?name=marco" title="Marco von Ballmoos" class="visible">marco</a> on <span class="date-time">7. Jan 2019 23:26:06 (GMT-5)</span>
</p>
</div>
      <div class="text-flow wide">
  <p><a href="https://www.theparisreview.org/blog/2018/12/17/one-missing-piece/">One Missing Piece</a> by <cite>Jill Talbot</cite> (<cite><a href="http://www.theparisreview.org/">The Paris Review</a></cite>) is the story of a chronically peripatetic woman and her daughter. The story is specifically about a road-trip from Texas to Camden, NY, returning to place they&rsquo;d lived for 3 years, full of memories.</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;Every September or October, my father took me to the State Fair of Texas in Dallas, and, later, he took me and my daughter. He always followed the same route, from the entrance to Big Tex, to Fletcher’s Corn Dogs, then onto the automobile building and the food building [1], on and on, always leaving with a bag of malt balls and handing some eager kid the handful of tickets we didn’t use on our way to the exit. </p>
<p>&ldquo;When my daughter and I returned last year without him, we followed the route we had memorized, and we stopped in front of Big Tex and took a selfie.</p>
<p>&ldquo;How could any of those groups of friends, those families, those kids struggling to be free from their strollers imagine, on such a bright autumn afternoon, that our photo was a tradition turned mourning? That the shutter closed on an ache?&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote><p><a href="https://idlewords.com/2018/12/gluten_free_antarctica.htm">Gluten Free Antarctica</a> by <cite>Maciej Ceglowski</cite> (<cite><a href="http://idlewords.com/">Idle Words</a></cite>) is the first part of a travelogue documenting his 5-week ship journey to Antarctica. He is an American of Russian/Polish descent, so he gets along with the crew on a different level than the other, idiosyncratic travelers.</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>There are tears of laughter on the bridge when I tell the Russian crew about the Great Antarctic Glutiny.</p>
<p>“You mean if this woman eats bread, she will die?“</p>
<p>“Not really. She just gets sick.“</p>
<p>“Yuri, come here! You have to hear this. If she eats bread, the woman will die.”</p>
<p>“She won’t die. Gluten causes digestive problems for some people. But it’s also become a sort of health fad.”</p>
<p>“What is ‘gluten’? Is that even a Russian word?”</p>
<p>Here they’ve got me. Tolstoy never wrote about gluten (kleikovina), and the ship’s dictionary is strictly nautical. Trying to paraphrase the concept only exposes the holes in my own understanding of this mysterious, flavorful substance.</p>
<p>“It’s some kind of a protein in grain. I think it makes things taste good.”</p>
<p>Yuri makes a skeptical face. </p>
<p>“It doesn’t kill anyone,” I insist. “But people can get digestive… unpleasantness.”</p>
<p>“So bread will make her sick?”</p>
<p>“Yes.”</p>
<p>“Can she eat potatoes?”</p>
<p>“Yes. And corn.”</p>
<p>Any hope of sympathy from the Russians evaporates.</p>
<p>“Then let her eat potatoes. Let her eat corn. Or let them all stay home and eat whatever the fuck they want.”</p>
</div></blockquote><p>He also writes about the culinary predilections of New Zealanders.</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>New Zealanders seem to have an almost pathological fear of flavor. There is no dish so bland that Conor can’t find a way to tone it down. At one point he serves us a tikka masala that I am pretty certain is just a blend of yogurt and ketchup. I watch disbelieving as the passengers around me fan their mouths. </p>
<p>“That’s got a bit of a kick, yeah?”</p>
</div></blockquote><p><a href="https://www.currentaffairs.org/2018/12/can-the-working-class-speak">Can the Working Class Speak?</a> by <cite>Maximillian Alvarez</cite> (<cite><a href="http://www.currentaffairs.org/">Current Affairs</a></cite>) starts off more as a story, but ends up more of an essay about Alvarez&rsquo;s podcast, <em>Working People</em>. Still, it has a few poignant passages and is quite interesting.</p>
<p>On struggling through a seemingly hopeless life:</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;All that time I worked, waiting for myself to come back. But I never really did. Because no one ever comes back—there’s never any safe, static “normal” to go back to. Encouraging and maintaining the cruel belief that there is still a “normal,” just out of reach, is just one of the many ways the forces that command our world keep us compliant and hopeful, sucking us dry while we wait for the return of a past that is always delayed.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>On being poor in America:</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;For the overwhelming majority of us, to live in the United States is to bask in a world that’s simply not ours, to be consumed by desires for what we don’t have, to strive to be what we’re not, to be told again and again that who we are is not good enough. We are inundated by an endless, kaleidoscopic barrage of elite lives and elite tastes, serving as a daily reminder to working people that the blood and sinew of our rich, complex lives will always count for less. And it compounds that unshakeable, shameful feeling we carry with us—the feeling that we’re the only ones going through this, that other people are getting by just fine, that our misery is our failure and ours alone.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>On a better way forward:</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;For what is socialism if not a vision for the material and social arrangement of a world in which we can finally practice the soul-affirming art of life in common? A world in which equality, dignity, freedom, peace, justice, and ecological sustainability are actualized in ways of living together and treating each other that enable the flourishing of a collective humanity, which capitalism has stunted and squandered in the endless search for profits.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>On his podcast:</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The concept behind Working People is incredibly simple: I talk to working-class folks from around the country, from all walks of life, and I record it. We talk about their life stories.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p><hr></p>
<div class="footnote-reference"><span id="footnote_DRAFTABLE_ENTRY_3654_1_body" class="footnote-number">[1]</span> The story speaks to me because I&rsquo;m from upstate New York and I&rsquo;ve been to the Texas State Fair—twice. I know exactly who means by &ldquo;Big Tex&rdquo; and I&rsquo;ve had a Fletcher&rsquo;s Corn Dog, and been to the automobile building. I have pictures, too.</div>      </div>
      </div>
        <div class="footer">
    <div class="footer-data"><div class="footer-links"><ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/contact.php" title="">Contact</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/support.php" title="">Support</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/privacy.php" title="">Privacy</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/rights.php" title="">Rights</a></li></ul></div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="copyright">Copyright (c) 1999-2026 earthli.com. All Rights Reserved.</div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="versions">Powered by <ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore/app_news.php">earthli News 3.7</a></li><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore" title="">earthli WebCore&trade; 3.7</a></li></ul></div></div>    </div>
      </div>
  </div>  </body>
</html>
]]>
  </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
      <title type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[Vocabulary Words]]>
  </title>
    <id>https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=2415</id>
    <link href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=2415"/>
    <updated>2019-01-02T21:18:04+01:00</updated>
    <author>
        <name type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[Marco von Ballmoos]]>
  </name>
      <uri>https://earthli.com/users/marco</uri>
    </author>
      <summary type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<p>This is a running list of vocabulary words I&rsquo;ve encountered in my reading over the last several years. I use the vocabulary-list feature on my Kindle to collect words, then export them from the Sqlite database with a simple SQL. From there, I have a text file with words that I combine with my... [<a class="complete-text-link" href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=2415">More</a>]</p>
]]>
  </summary>
      <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<html lang="en">
  <head>
    <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/themes/ice.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/fonts/raleway.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/core/medium.css">
  </head>
  <body>
<div class="style-controls">  <div class="page">
    <div class="page-body">
<div class="info-box-top">
<p>
Published by <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_user.php?name=marco" title="Marco von Ballmoos" class="visible">marco</a> on <span class="date-time">2. Jan 2019 21:18:04 (GMT-5)</span>
</p>
<p>
Updated by <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_user.php?name=marco" title="Marco von Ballmoos" class="visible">marco</a> on <span class="date-time">24. May 2025 12:51:00 (GMT-5)</span>
</p>
</div>
      <div class="text-flow wide">
  <p>This is a running list of vocabulary words I&rsquo;ve encountered in my reading over the last several years. I use the vocabulary-list feature on my Kindle to collect words, then export them from the Sqlite database with a simple SQL. From there, I have a text file with words that I combine with my existing list, deduplicate and then re-apply formatting to generate the text below.</p>
<p>I will occasionally update this list.</p>
<div class="caution ">Where a word (e.g. &ldquo;reef&rdquo;) has a common definition, I&rsquo;ve left it off, preferring to include the more-unusual or rarer definition or definitions.</div><div class=" " style="margin-left: 1em"><ol>
<li><strong>a fortiori</strong> – For a still stronger reason; all the more</li>
<li><strong>a-signifying</strong> – Incidentally meaningful semiotics; effective but not directly connected to intent, meaning or significance (e.g. <a href="https://larvalsubjects.wordpress.com/2011/01/26/a-signifying-semiotics/">purchase-history–based recommendations</a>)</li>
<li><strong>abdominous</strong> – Pot-bellied</li>
<li><strong>abiogenesis</strong> – The development of living organisms from nonliving matter. (the original definition included &ldquo;supposed&rdquo; before &ldquo;development&rdquo;, but it must have happened at least once or I&rsquo;d not be writing this)</li>
<li><strong>abjure</strong> – To renounce or retract, esp. formally, solemnly, or under oath</li>
<li><strong>ablative</strong> – Related to removal through melting or evaporation</li>
<li><strong>abnegation</strong> – Self-denial; renunciation of your own interests in favor of the interests of others</li>
<li><strong>abrogation</strong> – To abolish or annul, esp. by an authority</li>
<li><strong>absquatulate</strong> – To depart in a hurry; abscond</li>
<li><strong>abstruse</strong> – Difficult to understand; obscure</li>
<li><strong>accidie</strong> – Spiritual sloth; apathy; indifference</li>
<li><strong>acedia</strong> – Spiritual torpor and apathy; ennui.</li>
<li><strong>acidulous</strong> – Slightly acrid in taste or manner</li>
<li><strong>acnestis</strong> – On an animal, the point of the back that lies between the shoulders and the lower back, which cannot be reached to be scratched</li>
<li><strong>acrostic</strong> – Poem or text where the first letters of each line form a message</li>
<li><strong>acrotomophilia</strong> – The deriving of sexual gratification from fantasies or acts involving an amputee.</li>
<li><strong>adamant</strong> – <em>(n):</em> Extremely hard substance</li>
<li><strong>adduce</strong> – To cite as an example or means of proof in an argument</li>
<li><strong>adenoidal</strong> – Nasal in tone</li>
<li><strong>adiabatic</strong> – Occurring without gain or loss of heat (e.g., a sound wave moving through air)</li>
<li><strong>adjunct</strong> – Added or connected in a subordinate or auxiliary capacity</li>
<li><strong>adjuvant</strong> – A treatment that enhances an existing medical regimen, as a pharmacological agent added to a drug to increase or aid its effect.</li>
<li><strong>adumbrate</strong> – To give a sketchy outline</li>
<li><strong>advesperate</strong> – To approach evening</li>
<li><strong>aerostat</strong> – A lighter-than-air vehicle, like a balloon or dirigible</li>
<li><strong>aerumnous</strong> – Full of trouble </li>
<li><strong>aesculapian</strong> – Related to the art of medicine</li>
<li><strong>aesthete</strong> – A person who is unusually sensitive to beauty in art or nature</li>
<li><strong>aetiology</strong> – The philosophy or study of causation; variant of etiology</li>
<li><strong>affiant</strong> – One who makes an affidavit.</li>
<li><strong>afflatus</strong> – A strong creative impulse, especially as a result of divine inspiration.</li>
<li><strong>affray</strong> – A riot; a large group fighting</li>
<li><strong>aftosa</strong> – Another name for foot-and-mouth disease.</li>
<li><strong>aga</strong> – leader (civil or military) in the Ottoman empire</li>
<li><strong>agitprop</strong> – subversive writing; see samizdat</li>
<li><strong>agnatology</strong> – the study of culturally-induced ignorance</li>
<li><strong>agon</strong> – A conflict, especially between the protagonist and antagonist in a work of literature.</li>
<li><strong>agonistic</strong> – Argumentative; striving for effect; strained</li>
<li><strong>agraphon</strong> – The sayings of Jesus written in various ancient sources but not included in the canonical Gospels. Plural is <em>agrapha</em>.</li>
<li><strong>aiguillette</strong> – An ornamental cord worn on the shoulder of a military uniform</li>
<li><strong>ailurophobia</strong> – Extreme or irrational fear of cats.</li>
<li><strong>akinesia</strong> – Loss of normal motor function, resulting in impaired muscle movement</li>
<li><strong>akrasia</strong> – Weakness of will; acting contrary to one’s moral values</li>
<li><strong>Albion</strong> – Britain or England</li>
<li><strong>aleatory</strong> – Dependent on chance</li>
<li><strong>alee</strong> – On the leeward side</li>
<li><strong>alembic</strong> – Distilling apparatus consisting of two vessels and a tube</li>
<li><strong>algesia</strong> – The capacity to feel pain.</li>
<li><strong>aliform</strong> – Shaped like a wing; alar</li>
<li><strong>alizarin</strong> – An orange-red crystalline compound, C14H8O4, used as an acid-base indicator and in making dyes.</li>
<li><strong>alkahest</strong> – The hypothetical universal solvent once sought by alchemists.</li>
<li><strong>amanuensis</strong> – An assistant</li>
<li><strong>amaranth</strong> – An imaginary flower that never fades. Deep reddish-purple to dark or grayish, purplish red.</li>
<li><strong>ambuscade</strong> – An ambush</li>
<li><strong>amethyst</strong> – Purple or violet quartz</li>
<li><strong>amphisbaena</strong> – Mythical Greek ant-eating serpent with a head at each end</li>
<li><strong>anaclitic</strong> – Psychologically dependent on others</li>
<li><strong>anacoenosis</strong> – An appeal by the speaker to his opponents or to the audience for an opinion of the point</li>
<li><strong>anadem</strong> – A wreath or garland for the head.</li>
<li><strong>analysand</strong> – A person who is being psychoanalyzed</li>
<li><strong>anamnesis</strong> – 1. A recalling to memory; recollection; 2. the case history of a patient</li>
<li><strong>anastomosis</strong> – Connection of parts of a branching system to form a network (e.g. blood vessels or rivers)</li>
<li><strong>ambisyllabicity</strong> – A feature of a language where some words do not offer clear syllabic boundaries, e.g., &ldquo;hammer&rdquo;; see <a href="https://languagelog.ldc.upenn.edu/nll/?p=67297">Ambisyllabicity</a> (<cite><a href="http://languagelog.ldc.upenn.edu/">Language Log</a></cite>)</li>
<li><strong>ancho</strong> – A dried poblano pepper.</li>
<li><strong>andirons</strong> – A pair of metal supports used for holding up logs in a fireplace</li>
<li><strong>anfract</strong> – [definition unknown] (from <em>Umberto Eco</em>, <em>The Island of the Day Before</em> (<span class="quote-inline">&ldquo;[…] following its rifts and anfracts, past corridors of chalk in which vinous harlequins were stuck&rdquo;</span>)</li>
<li><strong>anhedonia</strong> – Inability to express pleasure</li>
<li><strong>anile</strong> – unable to think clearly or infirm because of old age</li>
<li><strong>anisotropic</strong> – Having properties that differ based on the direction of measurement (e.g. oval)</li>
<li><strong>anodyne</strong> – Uncontentious or inoffensive</li>
<li><strong>anoesis</strong> – Absence of thought (anoetic)</li>
<li><strong>anorak</strong> – A socially inept person with a hobby considered by most people to be boring</li>
<li><strong>anorectic</strong> – Marked by loss of appetite (anorexic)</li>
<li><strong>anserine</strong> – Goose-like</li>
<li><strong>anterior</strong> – Before or in front of; previously</li>
<li><strong>anthroponymy</strong> – The study of the names of human beings (syn: <em>anthroponomastics</em>)</li>
<li><strong>antimacassar</strong> – A protective and often decorative covering for the back or arms of a chair or sofa.</li>
<li><strong>antinomian</strong> – One who denies the fixed meaning or universal applicability of moral law</li>
<li><strong>antinomy</strong> – A contradiction between two beliefs or conclusions that are in themselves reasonable; a paradox</li>
<li><strong>antipodes</strong> – Group of rocky island near New Zealand, almost directly opposite Greenwich, England</li>
<li><strong>aperçus</strong> – A discerning perception; an insight.</li>
<li><strong>apodictic</strong> – Logically certain; demonstrably true or false</li>
<li><strong>apophasis</strong> – Allusion to something by denying that it will be mentioned, as in <em>I will not bring up my opponent&rsquo;s questionable financial dealings</em></li>
<li><strong>apophatic</strong> – Of or relating to the belief that God can only be described by a process of negation</li>
<li><strong>apophenia</strong> – The tendency to perceive connections and meaning between unrelated things; confirmation bias</li>
<li><strong>aporetic</strong> – A doubt, real or professed, about what to do or say</li>
<li><strong>aporia</strong> – An insoluble contradiction or paradox in a text&rsquo;s meanings.</li>
<li><strong>Aposematic</strong> – Having bright, colorful markings that warn predators of poison; a doubt, real or professed, about what to do or say</li>
<li><strong>apostasy</strong> – Abandonment of one’s religious faith, party or a cause</li>
<li><strong>apothegm</strong> – A maxim</li>
<li><strong>apotheosis</strong> – Deification; exaltation to divine rank (nirvana)</li>
<li><strong>apotropaic</strong> – Intended to ward off evil</li>
<li><strong>appanage</strong> – Provision (usually land) granted (usually to a family member) as a source of revenue</li>
<li><strong>apperception</strong> – Conscious perception with full awareness</li>
<li><strong>apposite</strong> – Appropriate or relevant</li>
<li><strong>approbation</strong> – Official approval</li>
<li><strong>appurtenance</strong> – 1. appendage; 2. gear</li>
<li><strong>aptronym</strong> – A name that fits a person&rsquo;s nature or occupation, like Jane House for a real estate agent.</li>
<li><strong>arbalest</strong> – Crossbow-like missile launcher</li>
<li><strong>arborescence</strong> – Having the size, form, or characteristics of a tree; treelike.</li>
<li><strong>architrave</strong> – The lintel or beam lying across two columns</li>
<li><strong>archivolt</strong> – A decorative molding carried around an arched wall opening.</li>
<li><strong>arcology</strong> – A portmanteau of architecture&rdquo; and &ldquo;ecology&rdquo;, a very densely populated habitat (page 231 of Reamde)</li>
<li><strong>arhat</strong> – One who has attained enlightenment.</li>
<li><strong>armamentarium</strong> – The complete range of materials available or used for a task</li>
<li><strong>armet</strong> – A late-medieval light helmet with a neck guard and movable visor</li>
<li><strong>armillary</strong> – Of or relating to the arm (e.g. bracelets)</li>
<li><strong>arquebus</strong> – A portable, long-barrelled gun, predecessor to the rifle</li>
<li><strong>arrant</strong> – Utter; out-and-out</li>
<li><strong>arras</strong> – A tapestry, wall hanging or curtain (usually Flemish)</li>
<li><strong>arreptitious</strong> – Snatched away; seized or possessed, as a demoniac; raving; mad; crack-brained</li>
<li><strong>artilect</strong> – A machine or robot possessing artificial intelligence</li>
<li><strong>asafetida</strong> – A plant common to Iran and Afghanistan; produces a brownish, strong-smelling resin</li>
<li><strong>askesis</strong> – The exercise of rigorous self-discipline, especially mental self-discipline practiced as a means to spiritual growth.</li>
<li><strong>aspirate</strong> – To draw in or remove by inhalation or suction, esp to suck (air or fluid) from a body cavity or to inhale (fluid) into the lungs after vomiting</li>
<li><strong>asseveration</strong> – A positive and emphatic declaration</li>
<li><strong>assignation</strong> – A tryst</li>
<li><strong>astragal</strong> – A molding that covers a gap (usually to prevent airflow)</li>
<li><strong>ataraxia</strong> – A calm of mind; serenity</li>
<li><strong>ataxic</strong> – Loss of the ability to coordinate muscle movement (Lucky Jim)</li>
<li><strong>Ativan</strong> – Tranquilizer; trade name for lorazepam</li>
<li><strong>atrabilious</strong> – Melancholy; peevish; surly</li>
<li><strong>attenuate</strong> – To become slender, fine or small</li>
<li><strong>auscultate</strong> – To listen to sounds produced by the body (e.g. heartbeat)</li>
<li><strong>autarky</strong> – Quality of being self-sufficient, as in a state or economy</li>
<li><strong>autoclave</strong> – A heavy vessel for sterilizing or cooking by means of steam under pressure.</li>
<li><strong>autochthonous</strong> – Local; native; indigenous</li>
<li><strong>autolatrous</strong> – Self-worshiping</li>
<li><strong>autological</strong> – Being a word that possesses the characteristic it describes. The word polysyllabic is autological, since it is itself polysyllabic.</li>
<li><strong>autopoiesis</strong> – A closed system capable of creating itself</li>
<li><strong>autotelic</strong> – Having a purpose in and justifying itself</li>
<li><strong>avariciously</strong> – Greedily, immoderately so</li>
<li><strong>avaunt</strong> – Hence; away (with thee)</li>
<li><strong>aventurine</strong> – A form of quartz; green; translucent with a shimmering or glistening effect</li>
<li><strong>avulsion</strong> – The forcible tearing away of a body part; change in landscape due to flooding or riverbed changes</li>
<li><strong>badinage</strong> – Light, playful banter or raillery.</li>
<li><strong>baize</strong> – Coarse woolen cloth (used e,g, to cover snooker or billiard tables)</li>
<li><strong>balanitis</strong> – Inflammation of the glans penis, usually due to infection</li>
<li><strong>balatron</strong> – Jester or buffoon</li>
<li><strong>balayage</strong> – A technique for highlighting hair in which the dye is painted on in such a way as to create a graduated, natural-looking effect</li>
<li><strong>balboa</strong> – The official currency of Panama</li>
<li><strong>baldachin</strong> – A canopy of state over an altar or throne</li>
<li><strong>ballista</strong> – Medieval field weapon similar to a crossbow (heavy projectiles)</li>
<li><strong>barding</strong> – The practice of armoring horses.</li>
<li><strong>basque</strong> – A woman&rsquo;s close-fitting bodice.</li>
<li><strong>bast</strong> – The phloem of a plant (bast fiber)</li>
<li><strong>bastinado</strong> – A beating on the soles of the feet</li>
<li><strong>bastion</strong> – 1. A projecting part of a fortification; 2. A well-fortified position</li>
<li><strong>Batavia</strong> – A former name for Jakarta</li>
<li><strong>bathetic</strong> – Portmanteau of bathos and pathetic (anticlimactic, banal, trite)</li>
<li><strong>bathypelagic</strong> – Relating to or inhabiting the layer of the water column of the open ocean that lies between the mesopelagic and abyssopelagic layers at depths of about 1,000 to 4,000 meters</li>
<li><strong>batrachian</strong> – An amphibian, esp. a frog or a salamander</li>
<li><strong>battement</strong> – 1. In dance, a kicking movement done with a lifted leg. 2. A beating; striking; impulse.</li>
<li><strong>baulk</strong> – Line from which croquet, snooker, billiard ball is put into play (or the area behind it)</li>
<li><strong>beadle</strong> – Church usher</li>
<li><strong>behove</strong> – To be necessary or fitting for (alternate spelling of <em>behoove</em>)</li>
<li><strong>beignet</strong> – A square doughnut without a hole; a fritter</li>
<li><strong>beldam</strong> – A hag (also written as <em>beldame</em>)</li>
<li><strong>bel esprit</strong> – A cultivated, highly intelligent person; pl.: <em>beaux esprits</em></li>
<li><strong>belie</strong> – To misrepresent</li>
<li><strong>benedicence</strong> – Benevolence in speech</li>
<li><strong>benthic</strong> – Of or pertaining to the bottom of a body of water</li>
<li><strong>besom</strong> – Twigs tied to a handle to make a broom</li>
<li><strong>bezique</strong> – A card game for two or more players with tricks similar to whist (or pinochle) but with additional points scored for honours and sequences: played with two packs with nothing below a seven</li>
<li><strong>bezoar</strong> – hard, indigestible mass of food in the stomach or intestines</li>
<li><strong>bibelot</strong> – A small decorative object; a trinket</li>
<li><strong>bidonville</strong> – A shantytown on the outskirts of a city, especially in France or North Africa.</li>
<li><strong>bight</strong> – A loop in a rope; a wide bay characterized by a bend or curve</li>
<li><strong>bilious</strong> – Peevish; ill-humored</li>
<li><strong>biretta</strong> – Square hat worn by ecclesiastics, with three or four ridges on the brow</li>
<li><strong>bitts</strong> – A post on the deck of a ship to which ropes or cables are secured</li>
<li><strong>blackleg</strong> – 1. A livestock or plant disease, usually fatal. 2. A cardsharp</li>
<li><strong>blench</strong> – To draw back or shy away, as from fear; flinch</li>
<li><strong>bloater</strong> – A large mackerel or herring, salted, smoked and dried</li>
<li><strong>bodikin</strong> – A small body; a tiny particle or atom</li>
<li><strong>bodkin</strong> – A long needle or awl; a dagger or stiletto</li>
<li><strong>boffin</strong> – A person who has extensive skill or knowledge in a particular field (<em>Brit.</em>; similar to <em>wonk</em> in <em>Amer.</em>)</li>
<li><strong>bolster</strong> – A long, narrow pillow or cushion</li>
<li><strong>bombilate</strong> – To make a certain noise or sound. To buzz.</li>
<li><strong>boracic</strong> – Having no money; Brit. slang</li>
<li><strong>borage</strong> – Southern European bristly herb with blue or purplish, star-shaped flowers</li>
<li><strong>bothy</strong> – Small hut or cottage (Scot.)</li>
<li><strong>bourg</strong> – 1. A market town. 2. A medieval village, especially one situated near a castle.</li>
<li><strong>boustrophedonic</strong> – A script that is simultaneously left-to-right and right-to-left</li>
<li><strong>bowdlerize</strong> – To expurgate literary material; to censor</li>
<li><strong>boyar</strong> – A member of the nobility of Russia, before Peter the Great</li>
<li><strong>bract</strong> – A leaflike or scalelike plant part, usually small, sometimes showy or brightly colored, and located just below a flower, a flower stalk, or an inflorescence</li>
<li><strong>bradycardia</strong> – Slowness of the heart rate (usually less than 60BPM)</li>
<li><strong>brassica</strong> – Genus that includes cabbage, swede, rape and mustard</li>
<li><strong>breechclout</strong> – A loincloth</li>
<li><strong>breezeway</strong> – An enclosure joining two parts of a building (e.g. a house and its garage)</li>
<li><strong>breviped</strong> – Having short legs.</li>
<li><strong>brigandine</strong> – Flexible body armor covered in cloth; also called <em>brigantine</em></li>
<li><strong>bromidrosis</strong> – Body odor</li>
<li><strong>bruit</strong> – A din or clamor</li>
<li><strong>brume</strong> – Fog or mist</li>
<li><strong>bucranium</strong> – A sculptured ornament, representing an ox skull adorned with wreaths, etc.</li>
<li><strong>burgeon</strong> – To begin to grow or blossom (to put forth buds)</li>
<li><strong>burgoo</strong> – Any of several thick stews, originally an oatmeal porridge.</li>
<li><strong>burbot</strong> – A freshwater food fish (Lota lota) of northern regions of the Northern Hemisphere, closely related to and resembling the cod and having a long barbel on the chin. Also called <em>cusk</em>, <em>eelpout</em>.</li>
<li><strong>buskin</strong> – A thick-soled laced half boot worn by actors of Greek and Roman tragedies</li>
<li><strong>buttonholer</strong> – Someone who accosts or detains (a person) in conversation</li>
<li><strong>cabochon</strong> – A highly polished, convex-cut, unfaceted gem</li>
<li><strong>cabotage</strong> – Law or policy protecting transporters of passengers and goods within a country from competition from foreign carriers.</li>
<li><strong>cachalot</strong> – Sperm whale</li>
<li><strong>cacoepy</strong> – Bad or mistaken pronunciation (<em>cacoëpistic</em> means to be mispronounced)</li>
<li><strong>cadastral</strong> – A public register showing details of ownership of the real property in a district, including boundaries and tax assessments</li>
<li><strong>caduceus</strong> – A herald’s wand or staff (usually refers to the two serpents logo of Hermes’s staff used by the medical profession)</li>
<li><strong>caecotrophs</strong> – Animals that are coprophagous (eat their own excrement)</li>
<li><strong>cafard</strong> – A feeling of severe depression (from the French, literally hypocrite, cockroach)</li>
<li><strong>caique</strong> – A long narrow rowboat traditionally used on the Bosporus.</li>
<li><strong>caisson</strong> – A watertight structure for performing work or repairs under water</li>
<li><strong>caitiff</strong> – A despicable coward; a wretch</li>
<li><strong>caleche</strong> – A light two- or four-wheeled horse-draw carriage</li>
<li><strong>calenture</strong> – A tropical fever thought to be caused by heat; similar to sunstroke</li>
<li><strong>caliche</strong> – A mineral deposit of gravel, sand, and nitrates</li>
<li><strong>caliginous</strong> – Dark, misty and gloomy</li>
<li><strong>calk</strong> – 1. A spiked plate that is fixed on the bottom of a shoe to prevent slipping and preserve the sole.; 2. A pointed extension on the toe or heels of a horseshoe, designed to prevent slipping.</li>
<li><strong>callipygian</strong> – Relating to or having buttocks that are considered beautifully proportioned</li>
<li><strong>callow</strong> – Immature</li>
<li><strong>calpac</strong> – A large black cap, usually of sheepskin or felt, worn in Turkey, the Caucasus, Iran, and neighboring regions. Also written as <em>kalpak</em>.</li>
<li><strong>calque</strong> – To make a loan translation from (a word in another language)</li>
<li><strong>caltrop</strong> – Metal spikes thrown across a road</li>
<li><strong>calumniate</strong> – To make maliciously or knowingly false statements about.</li>
<li><strong>calvados</strong> – A French brandy made from apples.</li>
<li><strong>canaille</strong> – The common people; the masses; the hoi polloi</li>
<li><strong>candlewick</strong> – A fabric resembling chenille, made with closely-spaced tufts of cotton and used primarily for bedspreads and robes</li>
<li><strong>canebrake</strong> – A piece of ground covered with a dense growth of canes</li>
<li><strong>canescent</strong> – Turning white or grayish; becoming hoary</li>
<li><strong>cannula</strong> – A tube inserted into a body cavity (e.g. a nose tube)</li>
<li><strong>cantrip</strong> – A deceptive move; a sham</li>
<li><strong>caoutchouc</strong> – Untreated rubber</li>
<li><strong>caparison</strong> – Fancy dress or ornamentation for a man or horse (or to make fancy by decorating in this way)</li>
<li><strong>capercaillie</strong> – A large grouse (<em>Tetrao urogallus</em>), native to northern Europe and having dark plumage and a fanlike tail. Also called <em>wood grouse</em>.</li>
<li><strong>capsid</strong> – A virus’s protein coat</li>
<li><strong>captious</strong> – Nitpicky; deliberately confusing; underhanded debating tactics</li>
<li><strong>caracole</strong> – A half-turn performed by a horse and rider (or to perform same)</li>
<li><strong>caravansary</strong> – An inn built around a large court for accommodating caravans (mostly in Asia)</li>
<li><strong>carboy</strong> – A large glass or plastic bottle, usually encased in a protective basket or crate and often used to hold corrosive liquids.</li>
<li><strong>carnelian</strong> – A pale to deep red or reddish-brown variety of clear chalcedony, used in jewelry.</li>
<li><strong>casement</strong> – A window or part of a window set on a hinge so that it opens like a door</li>
<li><strong>casuistical</strong> – Specious reasoning intended to mislead</li>
<li><strong>castrum</strong> – An old Roman fortress or encampment</li>
<li><strong>catabolic</strong> – The metabolic breakdown of complex molecules into simpler ones, often resulting in a release of energy.</li>
<li><strong>catafalque</strong> – A funeral bier</li>
<li><strong>catamenial</strong> – Of or relating to menstruation or the menses</li>
<li><strong>catamite</strong> – A boy who has a sexual relationship with a man.</li>
<li><strong>cataphract</strong> – A defensive armor, often made of link mail, used for the entire body (also covering a horse in cavalry)</li>
<li><strong>catastasis</strong> – The part of a drama immediately preceding the climax</li>
<li><strong>catawampus</strong> – Skewed, twisted</li>
<li><strong>catchpenny</strong> – Designed and made to sell without concern for quality; cheap.</li>
<li><strong>catechism</strong> – 1. A manual giving basic instruction in a subject, usually by rote or repetition; 2. A body of fundamental principles or beliefs, especially when accepted uncritically</li>
<li><strong>catechumen</strong> – A novice; one who is being instructed at an elementary level</li>
<li><strong>catenary</strong> – The curve formed by a cable suspended by its endpoints</li>
<li><strong>Catharism</strong> – A Christian sect flourishing in western Europe in the 1100s and 1200s, whose dualistic belief, embracing asceticism and identifying the world as the creation of a satanic Demiurge, was condemned by the Church as heretical.</li>
<li><strong>caudal</strong> – Situated beneath or on the underside; inferior; opposite of anterior</li>
<li><strong>caudillo</strong> – A leader or chief, especially a military dictator.</li>
<li><strong>causeuse</strong> – Two-seat couch; love seat</li>
<li><strong>cautery</strong> – The act or process or cauterizing (or an agent used to cauterize)</li>
<li><strong>cavil</strong> – To quibble</li>
<li><strong>cenotaph</strong> – A monument honoring a person buried elsewhere</li>
<li><strong>ceraunoscopy</strong> – A form of aeromancy, in this case divination using thunder and lightning.</li>
<li><strong>cerements</strong> – A burial cloth</li>
<li><strong>cernuous</strong> – Drooping, as the leaves of a plant</li>
<li><strong>chaff</strong> – Trivial or worthless matter; dry bracts of seeds, removed during threshing; metal bits emitted by a plane to foil radar</li>
<li><strong>chalcedony</strong> – A translucent to transparent milky or grayish quartz </li>
<li><strong>chancel</strong> – The space around the altar of a church for the clergy and sometimes the choir, often enclosed by a lattice or railing.</li>
<li><strong>chancellery</strong> – The rank, position, office or department of a chancellor</li>
<li><strong>chandler</strong> – One that makes or sells candles</li>
<li><strong>chaparral</strong> – An area covered by a dense growth of mostly small-leaved evergreen shrubs</li>
<li><strong>charas</strong> – A cannabis concentrate made from the resin of a live cannabis plant; from the Urdu/Hindi</li>
<li><strong>charivari</strong> – An elaborate, noisy celebration, often mocking (page 508 of the Idiot)</li>
<li><strong>chary</strong> – 1. Very cautious; wary; 2. Not giving or expending freely; sparing</li>
<li><strong>chatelaine</strong> – The mistress of a castle or of a large, fashionable household; a hooklike clasp with chains for suspending small objects, as keys worn at the waist by women esp. in the 18th and 19th centuries</li>
<li><strong>chautauqua</strong> – A summer school or educational meeting held in the summer</li>
<li><strong>chiasmus</strong> – Reversal of the order of words in the second of two parallel phrases: he came in triumph and in defeat departs.</li>
<li><strong>chiaroscuro</strong> – The technique of using light and shade in pictorial representation</li>
<li><strong>chiasmus</strong> – A rhetorical inversion of the second of two parallel structures, as in &ldquo;Each throat / Was parched, and glazed each eye&rdquo; (Samuel Taylor Coleridge).</li>
<li><strong>chicane</strong> – 1. An artificial narrowing or turn on a road or auto-racing course; 2. To resort to tricks or subterfuges</li>
<li><strong>chichak</strong> – Lobster-tailed pot helmet; from the Turkish name for it: &ldquo;çiçek&rdquo;.</li>
<li><strong>chicle</strong> – The coagulated milky latex of the sapodilla, formerly used as the principal ingredient of chewing gum.</li>
<li><strong>chifforobe</strong> – A tall piece of furniture typically having drawers on one side and space for hanging clothes on the other.</li>
<li><strong>chilblain</strong> – An inflammation followed by itchy irritation on the hands, feet, or ears, resulting from exposure to moist cold</li>
<li><strong>chimerical</strong> – Highly improbable or illusory</li>
<li><strong>chine</strong> – 1. The backbone or spine, esp. of an animal; 2. a cut of meat containing same</li>
<li><strong>chintz</strong> – A printed and glazed cotton fabric, usually of bright colors</li>
<li><strong>Chiron</strong> – The wise centaur who tutored Achilles, Hercules, and Asclepius</li>
<li><strong>chiropodist</strong> – A podiatrist or foot doctor</li>
<li><strong>chiton</strong> – 1. A mollusk that lives on rocks and has a shell consisting of eight overlapping calcareous plates. Also called sea cradle or coat-of-mail shell; 2. A tunic worn by men and women in ancient Greece</li>
<li><strong>choad</strong> – a. A penis (esp. one that is wider than it is long); 2. Someone who is obnoxious or annoying</li>
<li><strong>chode</strong> – Past tense of chide</li>
<li><strong>cholecystitis</strong> – Inflammation of the gallbladder</li>
<li><strong>choropleth</strong> – A symbol or marked and bounded area on a map denoting the distribution of some property</li>
<li><strong>chrism</strong> – A consecrated mixture of oil and balsam, used for anointing in church sacraments such as baptism and confirmation. Also called holy oil.</li>
<li><strong>chronophagy</strong> – Something that wastes (or &ldquo;eats&rdquo;) time.</li>
<li><strong>chyme</strong> – Semi-fluid mass of partly digested food/bolus in the stomach</li>
<li><strong>chyron</strong> – A graphic that is digitally superimposed over the lower portion of a broadcast television image, often scrolling or otherwise animated</li>
<li><strong>cichlid</strong> – Any of numerous tropical and subtropical chiefly freshwater fishes of the family Cichlidae, which includes the tilapias and many species that are popular as aquarium fish.</li>
<li><strong>cimicine</strong> – Smelling like bugs</li>
<li><strong>circumvallate</strong> – Encircle as with a rampart</li>
<li><strong>cisalpine</strong> – Relating to, living on, or coming from the southern side of the Alps</li>
<li><strong>cislunar</strong> – Of or relating to the space between the earth and the moon</li>
<li><strong>clabber</strong> – Sour, curdled milk; to curdle</li>
<li><strong>clafoutis</strong> – A baked dessert composed of a layer of fresh fruit topped with a thick batter. Chiefly French.</li>
<li><strong>clag</strong> – Sticky mud</li>
<li><strong>clapboard</strong> – 1. A long thin timber board with one edge thicker than the other, used in wood-frame construction by lapping each board over the one below; 2. a house made of same</li>
<li><strong>clavis</strong> – 1. A key; 2. A glossary</li>
<li><strong>clepsydra</strong> – An instrument designed to measure time by the fall or flow of a quantity of water; also called a &ldquo;water clock&rdquo;</li>
<li><strong>cleromancy</strong> – Divination by the casting of lots.</li>
<li><strong>clerestory</strong> – A portion of an interior rising above adjacent rooftops and having windows admitting daylight.</li>
<li><strong>clerisy</strong> – Educated people considered as a group; the literati.</li>
<li><strong>cloistered</strong> – Secluded or shut up from the world</li>
<li><strong>clotted cream</strong> – A thick cream made primarily in England by heating milk until a layer of cream forms on its surface that is then cooled and skimmed off</li>
<li><strong>clyster</strong> – An enema</li>
<li><strong>coadunate</strong> – Closely joined; grown together; united.</li>
<li><strong>cockade</strong> – An ornament, such as a rosette or knot of ribbon, usually worn on the hat as a badge.</li>
<li><strong>codon</strong> – A sequence of three adjacent nucleotides constituting the genetic code that determines the insertion of a specific amino acid in a polypeptide chain during protein synthesis or the signal to stop protein synthesis</li>
<li><strong>coffle</strong> – A line of animals or slaves, chained together</li>
<li><strong>coir</strong> – The fiber obtained from the husk of a coconut</li>
<li><strong>colliery</strong> – A coal mine together with its physical plant and outbuildings</li>
<li><strong>colloidal</strong> – A liquid within which very fine particles are evenly distributed so that they stay suspended</li>
<li><strong>colloquy</strong> – Written dialogue</li>
<li><strong>coloratura</strong> – Vocal music characterized by florid ornamental passages</li>
<li><strong>colporteur</strong> – A peddler of devotional literature</li>
<li><strong>colubra</strong> – A female snake</li>
<li><strong>colubrine</strong> – Serpentine</li>
<li><strong>Columbine</strong> – A flower from the buttercup family</li>
<li><strong>colure</strong> – Either of two great circles on the celestial sphere, one of which passes through the celestial poles and the equinoxes and the other through the poles and the solstices</li>
<li><strong>commensality</strong> – The act or practice of eating at the same table</li>
<li><strong>commixtion</strong> – The act of mixing together</li>
<li><strong>communard</strong> – One who lives in a commune</li>
<li><strong>compendious</strong> – Containing or stating briefly all the essentials of something; comprehensive and concise</li>
<li><strong>compossible</strong> – Able to exist with another thing; consistent.</li>
<li><strong>comprador</strong> – A person who acts as an agent for foreign organizations engaged in investment, trade, or economic or political exploitation</li>
<li><strong>connascent</strong> – Born, produced, or growing simultaneously</li>
<li><strong>conatus</strong> – the tendency of all things to persist in their own being</li>
<li><strong>concessio</strong> – &ldquo;A rhetorical stylistic tool in which one takes up the opponent’s argument, acknowledging it as correct while simultaneously weakening it. (E.g. “Yes. Günther has behaved immorally,</li>
<li><strong>but he can not be legally punished for it.”) See <em>paromologia</em>.&rdquo;</li>
<li>concomitant</strong> – Occurring or existing concurrently</li>
<li><strong>concupiscent</strong> – Lascivious</li>
<li><strong>condottiero</strong> – Italian captains in command of mercenary companies during the Middle Ages and of multinational armies during the early modern period.</li>
<li><strong>condign</strong> – Deserved; adequate</li>
<li><strong>confrater</strong> – n associate of a monastery or monastic group who received certain privileges (as a share in prayers) without corresponding responsibilities (as rigorous life or restrictive vows)</li>
<li><strong>congelation</strong> – The process of congealing or the state of being congealed.</li>
<li><strong>congeries</strong> – A collection</li>
<li><strong>conjunctivitis</strong> – Inflammation of the conjunctiva, characterized by redness and often accompanied by a discharge</li>
<li><strong>conker</strong> – A horse chestnut</li>
<li><strong>conkers</strong> – A game in which two players swing horse chestnuts strung on string, each trying to use his or her horse chestnut to shatter his or her opponent&rsquo;s.</li>
<li><strong>connubial</strong> – Of marriage or wedlock; matrimonial; conjugal.</li>
<li><strong>consilience</strong> – A chance happening or coincidence</li>
<li><strong>conspecific</strong> – Of or belonging to the same species.</li>
<li><strong>constult</strong> – To act stupidly together</li>
<li><strong>consubstantiality</strong> – Participation of the same nature; coexistence in the same substance.</li>
<li><strong>consorority</strong> – A group of women; a religious sorority or sisterhood; members are called <em>consorors</em></li>
<li><strong>contango</strong> – A situation where the futures price of a commodity is higher than the spot price</li>
<li><strong>contemn</strong> – To view with contempt; despise</li>
<li><strong>contra mundum</strong> – Against the world; in defiance of all general opinion</li>
<li><strong>contrariety</strong> – The quality or condition of being contrary.</li>
<li><strong>contretemps</strong> – 1. An inopportune or embarrassing occurrence or situation; 2. an argument or dispute</li>
<li><strong>contumacious</strong> – Anti-authoritarian</li>
<li><strong>contumely</strong> – Rudeness or contempt arising from arrogance; insolence</li>
<li><strong>conurbation</strong> – A predominantly urban region including adjacent towns and suburbs; a metropolitan area</li>
<li><strong>convolvulus</strong> – Any typically twining herbaceous convolvulaceous plant of the genus Convolvulus, having funnel-shaped flowers and triangular leaves</li>
<li><strong>copula</strong> – The word or set of words that serves as a link between the subject and predicate of a proposition</li>
<li><strong>coracle</strong> – A small, rounded, primitive boat (stretched skin over wooden frame)</li>
<li><strong>corbel</strong> – A piece of stone, wood, brick, or other building material, projecting from the face of a wall and generally used to support a cornice or arch.</li>
<li><strong>cornet</strong> – A cap of paper twisted at the end, used by retailers to inclose small wares.</li>
<li><strong>corsac</strong> – A fox of central Asia.</li>
<li><strong>corse</strong> – A corpse (<em>archaic</em>)</li>
<li><strong>corseque</strong> – A type of European polearm, characterized by a three-lobe blade on a 1.8 to 2.5 m shaft. The head features a long spike and two shorter and stronger lateral blades.</li>
<li><strong>corvée</strong> – Labor exacted by a local authority for little or no pay or instead of taxes and used especially in the maintenance of roads.</li>
<li><strong>corybantic</strong> – To dance in a fashion similar to rites for the Phrygian goddess Cybele, celebrated with music and ecstatic dances</li>
<li><strong>cotise</strong> – A narrow stripe that usually occurs as one of a pair, with each stripe occurring on either side of a bend, fess, or other charge in heraldry</li>
<li><strong>coup de foudre</strong> – A sudden and amazing action or event</li>
<li><strong>crepuscular</strong> – Resembling twilight; dim; active at twilight (from <em>Reamde</em>)</li>
<li><strong>cresset</strong> – A metal cup, often suspended on a pole, containing burning oil or pitch and used as a torch</li>
<li><strong>cretonne</strong> – A heavy unglazed cotton, linen, or rayon fabric, colorfully printed and used for draperies and slipcovers</li>
<li><strong>crim</strong> – Short for criminal</li>
<li><strong>cromlech</strong> – A portal tomb; A prehistoric monument consisting of a group of megaliths, sometimes arranged in a circle or in concentric circles. See <em>dolmen</em></li>
<li><strong>crosier</strong> – A staff with a crook or cross at the end, carried by or before an abbot, bishop, or archbishop as a symbol of office.</li>
<li><strong>crotchet</strong> – An odd, whimsical, perverse or stubborn notion</li>
<li><strong>croup</strong> – The rump of a beast of burden, especially a horse.</li>
<li><strong>croupy</strong> – Characterized by respiratory difficulty and a hoarse, brassy cough</li>
<li><strong>crumhorn</strong> – A wind instrument of the Renaissance with a curving tube and a double reed.</li>
<li><strong>cryptid</strong> – Animals that cryptozoologists believe may exist somewhere in the wild, but are not believed to exist by mainstream science</li>
<li><strong>cuirass</strong> – A piece of armor for protecting the breast and back, often consisting of two pieces fastened together</li>
<li><strong>cuirassier</strong> – A horse soldier in European armies whose equipment included the cuirass</li>
<li><strong>culverin</strong> – 1. An early, crudely made musket; 1. A long heavy cannon used in the 16th and 17th centuries</li>
<li><strong>cumbrously</strong> – In a cumbersome manner; difficult to handle because of size or weight</li>
<li><strong>cunctation</strong> – Procrastination; delay</li>
<li><strong>cupidity</strong> – Excessive desire, esp. for wealth; covetousness or avarice</li>
<li><strong>curate</strong> – 1. A member of the clergy employed to assist a rector or vicar; 2. To take charge of (a museum) or organize (an art exhibit); 3. To gather and present to the public</li>
<li><strong>curlew</strong> – Any of several brownish, long-legged shorebirds of the genus Numenius, having long, slender, downward-curving bills</li>
<li><strong>currycomb</strong> – A comb with plastic or rubber teeth, used for grooming horses.</li>
<li><strong>curtilage</strong> – The area considered legally part of a house or dwelling by virtue of its enclosure by a fence or habitual use in domestic activities.</li>
<li><strong>curule</strong> – Privileged to sit in a curule chair; of superior rank.</li>
<li><strong>cuspidor</strong> – spittoon; a large bowl, often of metal, serving as a receptacle for spit, esp. from chewing tobacco</li>
<li><strong>cutis</strong> – The dermis and epidermis of the skin together</li>
<li><strong>cynosure</strong> – Focal point of attention or admiration</li>
<li><strong>dacoit</strong> – A member of a robber band or gang in South Asia</li>
<li><strong>dag</strong> – Hanging fur matted with mud</li>
<li><strong>damask</strong> – 1. A rich patterned fabric of cotton, linen, silk, or wool; 2. the wavy pattern on Damascus steel</li>
<li><strong>davit</strong> – A small crane that projects over the side of a ship and is used to hoist boats, anchors, and cargo</li>
<li><strong>deadhead</strong> – To remove dead flowers from a bush</li>
<li><strong>deare</strong> – An act of damage or injury</li>
<li><strong>debauch</strong> – To corrupt morally; to seduce</li>
<li><strong>debility</strong> – Being weak or infirm</li>
<li><strong>deckle</strong> – A frame used in making paper by hand to form paper pulp into sheets of a desired size.</li>
<li><strong>decoupage</strong> – The technique of decorating a surface with cutouts, as of paper, and finishing with layers of lacquer or varnish</li>
<li><strong>decrepicate</strong> – To make a crackling sound when roasted (crystals or salts)</li>
<li><strong>decurion</strong> – The commander of a troop of ten cavalrymen</li>
<li><strong>defalcation</strong> – Misuse of funds; embezzlement</li>
<li><strong>defeasance</strong> – The voiding of a contract or deed</li>
<li><strong>deflagrate</strong> – To burn or cause to burn with great heat and intense light</li>
<li><strong>deictic</strong> – Directly proving by argument</li>
<li><strong>dekko</strong> – A look; a glance; view. E.g. Take a <em>dekko</em> at.</li>
<li><strong>delation</strong> – The act of conveying; carriage (<em>obsolete</em>)</li>
<li><strong>delator</strong> – An accuser; an informer</li>
<li><strong>deliquesce</strong> – 1. To disappear as if by melting; 2. to dissolve and become liquid by absorbing moisture from the air; 3. to branch out into numerous subdivisions that lack a main axis, as the trunk of an elm</li>
<li><strong>démarche</strong> – 1. A course of action; a maneuver. 2. A diplomatic representation or protest. 3. A statement or protest addressed by citizens to public authorities.</li>
<li><strong>demesne</strong> – An extensive piece of landed property; an estate</li>
<li><strong>demit</strong> – To relinquish (an office or function).</li>
<li><strong>demiurge</strong> – A powerful creative force or personality</li>
<li><strong>demob</strong> – Short for demobilization of armed forces</li>
<li><strong>demonym</strong> – Official designation for the inhabitant of a region (see <em>gentilic</em>)</li>
<li><strong>demotic</strong> – Of or relating to the common people; popular</li>
<li><strong>deodand</strong> – A thing that had caused a person&rsquo;s death and was forfeited to the crown for a charitable purpose; literally: &ldquo;giving unto God&rdquo;</li>
<li><strong>Deontology</strong> – The normative ethical theory that the morality of an action should be based on whether that action itself is right or wrong under a series of rules and principles, rather than based on the consequences of the action.</li>
<li><strong>deoppilate</strong> – To clear a passage through</li>
<li><strong>derecho</strong> – A windstorm that is accompanied by a quickly moving, usually bow-shaped band of showers or thunderstorms.</li>
<li><strong>descant</strong> – 1. An ornamental melody or counterpoint sung or played above a theme; 2. A discussion or discourse on a theme</li>
<li><strong>desideratum</strong> – Something considered necessary or highly desirable</li>
<li><strong>desquamate</strong> – To shed, peel, or come off in scales. Used of skin</li>
<li><strong>desuetude</strong> – A state of disuse or inactivity.</li>
<li><strong>deuteranopia</strong> – A form of colorblindness characterized by insensitivity to green.</li>
<li><strong>diachronic</strong> – Of or concerned with phenomena, such as linguistic features, as they change through time.</li>
<li><strong>diagetic</strong> – Music that exists within the reality of a film</li>
<li><strong>dialetheia</strong> – True contradictions (true statements whose opposite is also true)</li>
<li><strong>diaphoresis</strong> – Copious perspiration; usu. a condition</li>
<li><strong>dibble</strong> – A pointed gardening implement used to make holes in soil, especially for planting bulbs or seedlings. Also called a <em>dibber</em>.</li>
<li><strong>diegesis</strong> – The world that is depicted in a work of narrative art, especially a film.</li>
<li><strong>diegetic</strong> – Existing or occurring within the world of a narrative rather than as something external to that world (i.e. narration or soundtrack music in a film is <em>non</em>-diegetic)</li>
<li><strong>dieresis</strong> – Diacritical mark indicating a pronounced vowel</li>
<li><strong>diffident</strong> – Lacking or marked by a lack of self-confidence; shy and timid</li>
<li><strong>dilatory</strong> – Causing or intended to cause delay</li>
<li><strong>dimity</strong> – A sheer, crisp cotton fabric with raised woven stripes or checks, used chiefly for curtains and dresses.</li>
<li><strong>dioptric</strong> – Relating to optical refraction; refractive</li>
<li><strong>disanalogy</strong> – A lack or failure of analogy.</li>
<li><strong>discursive</strong> – Covering a wide field of subjects; rambling.</li>
<li><strong>disembogue</strong> – Pour out; be disgorged in quantity</li>
<li><strong>disheveled</strong> – Being in loose disarray; unkempt, as hair or clothing</li>
<li><strong>dissimulate</strong> – To conceal one&rsquo;s true feelings or intentions</li>
<li><strong>dissolute</strong> – Lacking moral restraint; indulging in sensual pleasures or vices; lax in morals; licentious</li>
<li><strong>distaff</strong> – Women considered as a group; female</li>
<li><strong>dithyramb</strong> – 1. any wildly enthusiastic speech or writing 2. A frenzied, impassioned choric hymn and dance of ancient Greece in honor of Dionysus</li>
<li><strong>divagate</strong> – 1. To wander or drift about; 2. to ramble; digress</li>
<li><strong>doolally</strong> – Out of one&rsquo;s mind; crazy</li>
<li><strong>dolmen</strong> – A Neolithic stone formation, consisting of a horizontal stone supported by several vertical stones, and thought to be a tomb; any megalithic tomb; see <em>cromlech</em></li>
<li><strong>dombra</strong> – A long-necked Kazakh, Uzbek and Bashkir lute</li>
<li><strong>doss</strong> – 1. Sleep; rest; 2. a crude or makeshift bed</li>
<li><strong>douanier</strong> – A customs officer</li>
<li><strong>dovecote</strong> – A compartmental structure, often raised on a pole, for housing domesticated pigeons</li>
<li><strong>dowager</strong> – 1. A widow who holds a title or property derived from her deceased husband; 2. an elderly woman of high social station</li>
<li><strong>doxastic</strong> – Of or relating to belief</li>
<li><strong>doxology</strong> – An expression of praise to God, esp. a short hymn sung as part of a Christian worship service</li>
<li><strong>draughts</strong> – The game of checkers</li>
<li><strong>drawknife</strong> – A knife with a handle at each end of the blade, used with a drawing motion to shave a surface. Also called <em>drawshave</em>.</li>
<li><strong>dropsy</strong> – An excessive accumulation of serous fluid in tissue spaces or a body cavity; edema (<em>obsolete</em>)</li>
<li><strong>drupe</strong> – A fleshy fruit with a pit (e.g. peach, plum, cherry, etc.)</li>
<li><strong>duckboard</strong> – A board or boardwalk laid across wet or muddy ground or flooring</li>
<li><strong>dudgeon</strong> – 1. A sullen, angry, or indignant humor; 2. A dagger with a hilt made of this wood.</li>
<li><strong>dunam</strong> – A unit of area used for land measurement in Israel and usually equal to 1,000 square meters.</li>
<li><strong>dupatta</strong> – A long wide scarf often worn draped over the head or across the shoulders, chiefly by women in South Asia</li>
<li><strong>duumvirate</strong> – 1. A regime or partnership of two persons 2. A coalition of two people holding the same office, as in ancient Rome.</li>
<li><strong>dysarthria</strong> – Unclear articulation of otherwise normal speech</li>
<li><strong>dysgraphic</strong> – Having a neurological disorder marked by impairment of the ability to write, especially to write by hand and to spell.</li>
<li><strong>dysphemism</strong> – The use of a derogatory, offensive or vulgar word or phrase to replace a (more) neutral original.</li>
<li><strong>dysphoria</strong> – An emotional state characterized by anxiety, depression, or unease; the opposite of <em>euphoria</em></li>
<li><strong>easement</strong> – 1. The act of anointing as part of a religion; 2. An ointment or oil; a salve</li>
<li><strong>eau-de-nil</strong> – A pale yellowish green color, supposedly that of the color of the Nile (taken from the French for “water of the Nile”)</li>
<li><strong>ecclesial</strong> – Of or relating to a church, especially as an organized institution. Syn.: <em>ecclesiastical</em></li>
<li><strong>ecdemic</strong> – Not indigenous or endemic; foreign</li>
<li><strong>echolalia</strong> – The uncontrollable and immediate repetition of words spoken by another person, esp. as associated with mental disorder.</li>
<li><strong>écorché</strong> – An anatomical representation of all or part of a human or animal body with the skin removed so as to display the musculature</li>
<li><strong>ecotone</strong> – A transitional zone between two communities containing species characteristic of each.</li>
<li><strong>ecumene</strong> – A nuclear area of high culture to which neighboring regions stand in a relation of cultural backwardness or dependence</li>
<li><strong>efflorescence</strong> – 1. A gradual process of unfolding or developing; 2. the point or time of greatest vigor; the culmination</li>
<li><strong>egregoric</strong> – Of or relating to the occult concept of a group mind, <em>egregore</em></li>
<li><strong>eidolon</strong> – An image of an ideal. An apparition.</li>
<li><strong>eirenist</strong> – Someone who promotes peace; someone who is conciliatory; variant of <em>irenist</em>; related to <em>irenic</em></li>
<li><strong>eisegesis</strong> – Reading meaning into a text that is not there</li>
<li><strong>ekphrastic</strong> – In the style of a work of art produced as a rhetorical exercise.</li>
<li><strong>Elbrus</strong> – A peak, 5,643 m (18,513 ft) high, in the Caucasus Mountains of southwest Russia near the border of Georgia. It is the highest elevation in Europe</li>
<li><strong>eleemosynary</strong> – 1. Of, concerned with, or dependent on charity; 2. Given as an act of charity</li>
<li><strong>elegiac</strong> – Of, relating to, or involving elegy or mourning or expressing sorrow for that which is irrecoverably past</li>
<li><strong>elozable</strong> – Readily influenced by flattery</li>
<li><strong>emanant</strong> – Flowing, issuing, or proceeding from something else; becoming apparent by an effect.</li>
<li><strong>embonpoint</strong> – The plump or fleshy part of a person’s body, in particular a woman’s bosom.</li>
<li><strong>embouchure</strong> – The mouth of a river</li>
<li><strong>emolument</strong> – Payment for an office or employment; compensation</li>
<li><strong>Empedocles</strong> – Greek philosopher who believed that all matter is composed of earth, air, fire and water, and that all change is caused by attraction and repulsion.</li>
<li><strong>empennage</strong> – The tail assembly of an aircraft (page 223 of <em>Reamde</em>)</li>
<li><strong>empyrean</strong> – Heavenly or sublime; the highest part of the (supposedly spherical) heavens, thought in ancient times to contain the pure element of fire and by early Christians to be the abode of God and the angels</li>
<li><strong>enantiodromia</strong> – The principle that a superabundance of a force produces its opposite</li>
<li><strong>enantiomorphic</strong> – Relating to two objects, each of which is the mirror image of the other; to be chemically identical; i.e., crystals that are mirror images of each other.</li>
<li><strong>enceinte</strong> – Pregnant (from the French)</li>
<li><strong>encomiast</strong> – A person who delivers or writes an encomium; a eulogist</li>
<li><strong>encomium</strong> – Warm praise</li>
<li><strong>endometriosis</strong> – The presence of endometrium elsewhere than in the lining of the uterus; causes premenstrual pain and dysmenorrhea</li>
<li><strong>endonym</strong> – The name for themselves, their homeland, or their language of a people or social group</li>
<li><strong>endue</strong> – To provide with a quality or trait; endow</li>
<li><strong>energumen</strong> – A person thought to be possessed by an evil spirit; a fanatic or a zealot</li>
<li><strong>enfeoff</strong> – To invest (a person) with possession of a freehold estate in land</li>
<li><strong>Ensor</strong> – Belgian expressionist painter, noted for his macabre subjects</li>
<li><strong>entasis</strong> – A slight convexity or swelling, as in the shaft of a column, conventionally employed especially in classical architecture.</li>
<li><strong>entelechy</strong> – Actuality as opposed to potentiality (from Aristotelian philosophy) </li>
<li><strong>entheogenic</strong> – Hallucinogenic, psychedelic, or mind-altering. It applies esp. to drugs or plants employed in mystical, religious, or spiritual ceremonies</li>
<li><strong>entrepôt</strong> – A warehouse; a market or trading center (page 648 of <em>Reamde</em>; also page 12 of <em>The Nutmeg&rsquo;s Curse</em>)</li>
<li><strong>enure</strong> – To toughen or harden by use or exposure; accustom; habituate (see <em>inure</em>)</li>
<li><strong>enuresis</strong> – The involuntary discharge of urine; urinary incontinence</li>
<li><strong>epeirogeny</strong> – Uplift or depression of the earth&rsquo;s crust, affecting large areas of land or ocean bottom</li>
<li><strong>epenthesis</strong> – Insertion of a sound in a word</li>
<li><strong>epergne</strong> – An ornamental stand or dish for holding fruit, flowers, etc., used as a centerpiece</li>
<li><strong>epexegesis</strong> – Additional explanation or explanatory material. Epexegetically: in an explanatory manner.</li>
<li><strong>ephebe</strong> – A youth between 18 and 20 years of age in ancient Greece.</li>
<li><strong>epicortical</strong> – On top of the bark (botanical)</li>
<li><strong>epicurean</strong> – Devoted to the pursuit of sensual pleasure, esp. to the enjoyment of good food and comfort</li>
<li><strong>epideictic</strong> – Designed primarily for rhetorical display</li>
<li><strong>epigenetic</strong> – Denoting processes by which heritable modifications in gene function occur without a change in the sequence of the DNA</li>
<li><strong>epigone</strong> – A second-rate imitator or follower, esp. of an artist or a philosopher</li>
<li><strong>epigram</strong> – A concise, clever, often paradoxical statement (can be a poem); see <em>Yogi Berra</em> or <em>Groucho Marx</em></li>
<li><strong>epigraph</strong> – 1. An inscription, as on a statue or building; 2. a motto or quotation, as at the beginning of a literary composition, setting forth a them</li>
<li><strong>epiphenomena</strong> – 1. A secondary or additional phenomenon; by-product; 2. An unexpected or atypical symptom or occurrence during the course of a disease</li>
<li><strong>epistemology</strong> – Study of the nature of knowledge</li>
<li><strong>epistle</strong> – A literary composition in the form of a letter</li>
<li><strong>epistolary</strong> – Of or associated with letters or the writing of letters</li>
<li><strong>epitatic</strong> – [definition unknown] (from <em>Oblivion</em> by David Foster Wallace)</li>
<li><strong>epithelium</strong> – Membranous tissue composed of one or more layers of cells separated by very little intercellular substance and forming the covering of most internal and external surfaces of the body and its organs</li>
<li><strong>epizeuxis</strong> – The repetition of a word with vehemence and emphasis</li>
<li><strong>equanimity</strong> – The quality of being calm and even-tempered; composure</li>
<li><strong>equerry</strong> – A personal attendant to the British royal household, generally responsible for the horses</li>
<li><strong>ergodic</strong> – Of or relating to the probability that any state will recur</li>
<li><strong>erysipelas</strong> – An acute streptococcal infectious disease of the skin, characterized by fever, headache, vomiting, and purplish raised lesions, esp. on the face. Also called: Saint Anthony&rsquo;s fire</li>
<li><strong>Esau</strong> – In the Bible, the eldest son of Isaac and Rebecca who sold his birthright to his twin brother, Jacob, for a mess of pottage</li>
<li><strong>eschatology</strong> – The branch of theology that is concerned with the end of the world or of humankind</li>
<li><strong>escheat </strong> – A common law doctrine that transfers the real property of a person who has died without heirs to the Crown or state</li>
<li><strong>escutcheon</strong> – Shield or emblem bearing a coat of arms</li>
<li><strong>espaliered</strong> – A tree or shrub that is trained to grow in a flat plane against a wall or trellis, often in a symmetrical pattern.</li>
<li><strong>estaminet</strong> – A small café.</li>
<li><strong>estivation</strong> – Dormancy or torpor during the summer</li>
<li><strong>esurient</strong> – Hungry</li>
<li><strong>etiolate</strong> – 1. To cause to appear pale and sickly; 2. to make weak by stunting the growth or development of</li>
<li><strong>eudaemonic</strong> – Producing happiness and well-being</li>
<li><strong>euonym</strong> – A name that is apt or fitting.</li>
<li><strong>euphonium</strong> – A brass instrument similar to the tuba but having a somewhat higher pitch and a mellower sound</li>
<li><strong>euphonious</strong> – Pleasing or agreeable to the ear.</li>
<li><strong>evanescent</strong> – Vanishing or likely to vanish like vapor, ephemeral or transitory, passing out of sight; fading away; vanishing</li>
<li><strong>evection</strong> – Irregularity in the moon&rsquo;s motion caused by perturbations of the sun and planets</li>
<li><strong>equivoque</strong> – A pun; a double meaning; an equivocal word or expression</li>
<li><strong>excrescent</strong> – Abnormal or excessive growth</li>
<li><strong>exegesis</strong> – Critical explanation or analysis</li>
<li><strong>exegete</strong> – A person skilled in exegesis</li>
<li><strong>exercitant</strong> – One who practices religious exercises</li>
<li><strong>exigent</strong> – Requiring immediate aid or action</li>
<li><strong>exiguous</strong> – Meager or extremely scanty</li>
<li><strong>exonym</strong> – A name by which one people or social group refers to another and by which the group so named does not refer to itself.</li>
<li><strong>exophthalmic</strong> – Characterized by the prominence of the eyeballs</li>
<li><strong>exordium</strong> – A beginning or introductory part, esp. of a speech or treatise</li>
<li><strong>exoteric</strong> – Not confined to an inner circle of disciples or initiates.</li>
<li><strong>extrorse</strong> – Botanical term for facing outward or turned away from the axis</li>
<li><strong>exuvia</strong> – An animal&rsquo;s cast or sloughed skin, especially that of an insect larva. Pl. <em>exuviae</em></li>
<li><strong>factotum</strong> – An assistant who takes on a wide range of tasks and responsibilities.</li>
<li><strong>fain</strong> – Happily; gladly (<em>archaic</em>)</li>
<li><strong>fainéant</strong> – Given to doing nothing; lazy.</li>
<li><strong>falchion</strong> – A short and slightly curved medieval sword broader towards the point</li>
<li><strong>fantail</strong> – Overhanging stern of a boat (esp. a warship)</li>
<li><strong>fard</strong> – To paint the face with cosmetics, so as to hide blemishes </li>
<li><strong>farrago</strong> – An assortment or a medley; a hodgepodge</li>
<li><strong>farro</strong> – The grains of three wheat species</li>
<li><strong>farrow</strong> – 1. A litter of pigs. 2. To produce a litter of pigs.</li>
<li><strong>fascicle</strong> – 1. One of the parts of a book published in separate sections. 2. A small bundle (e.g., of stems, flowers, or leaves)</li>
<li><strong>faute-de-mieux</strong> – For lack of something better</li>
<li><strong>fauvism</strong> – An early 20th-century movement in painting begun by a group of French artists and marked by the use of bold, often distorted forms and vivid colors.</li>
<li><strong>fecundate</strong> – Fertilize; make fruitful</li>
<li><strong>felid</strong> – Sly, stealthy, or treacherous; belonging or pertaining to the cat family (related to <em>canid</em> for dogs)</li>
<li><strong>fesse</strong> – A wide horizontal band forming the middle section of an escutcheon.</li>
<li><strong>fiacre</strong> – A small four-wheeled carriage</li>
<li><strong>fideistic</strong> – Reliance on faith alone rather than scientific reasoning or philosophy in questions of religion.</li>
<li><strong>fieldfare</strong> – An European thrush</li>
<li><strong>fillip</strong> – 1. A snap or light blow made by pressing a fingertip against the thumb and suddenly releasing it; 2. To stimulate or arouse (or something that does so)</li>
<li><strong>finial</strong> – 1. An ornamental terminating part, as on a post or piece of furniture; 2. an ornament on top of a spire, gable</li>
<li><strong>firedamp</strong> – Methane</li>
<li><strong>firth</strong> – A long, narrow inlet</li>
<li><strong>fissiparous</strong> – Having a tendency to divide into groups or factions</li>
<li><strong>flews</strong> – The fleshy hanging upper lip of a bloodhound or similar dog</li>
<li><strong>flinder</strong> – 1. A butterfly. 2. To scamper about flutteringly 3. To break (something) into flinders (pieces)</li>
<li><strong>flintknap</strong> – The process of chipping away material from high silica stones like &ldquo;flint&rdquo; in a carefully controlled manner with special tools to produce sharp projectile points or tools.</li>
<li><strong>flivver</strong> – A broken-down car or jalopy</li>
<li><strong>flocculent</strong> – Having a fluffy or woolly appearance; fleecy</li>
<li><strong>flyblown</strong> – 1. Tainted; corrupt; 2. dirty or rundown; squalid</li>
<li><strong>flyover</strong> – An overpass, as on a highway (chieflly British)</li>
<li><strong>folie à deux</strong> – Mental illness occurring simultaneously in two intimately related persons who share some of the elements of the illness, such as delusions</li>
<li><strong>fomes</strong> – Any inanimate or nonpathogenic substance or material, exclusive of food, which may act as a vector for a pathogen.</li>
<li><strong>fomites</strong> – Plural of <em>fomes</em></li>
<li><strong>foolscap</strong> – A sheet of writing or printing paper measuring about 13 by 16 inches</li>
<li><strong>forcemeat</strong> – Finely ground and highly spiced meat, fish, or poultry that is served alone or used in stuffing.</li>
<li><strong>foxed</strong> – Marked with spots or discoloration, as from age</li>
<li><strong>frass</strong> – Debris or excrement produced by insects.</li>
<li><strong>frazil</strong> – Small pieces of ice that form in water moving turbulently enough to prevent the formation of a sheet of ice</li>
<li><strong>fritinancy</strong> – A chirping or creaking, as of a cricket.</li>
<li><strong>frowsy</strong> – 1. Unkempt; slovenly; 2. ill-smelling; musty</li>
<li><strong>frugivore</strong> – An animal, such as a chimpanzee or fruit bat, that feeds primarily on fruit.</li>
<li><strong>fubsy</strong> – Fat and squat</li>
<li><strong>fucus</strong> – A seaweed common to intertidal regions and typically having greenish-brown slimy fronds. See also <em>wrack</em></li>
<li><strong>fugle</strong> – 1. to maneuver; to move hither and thither. 2. to make signals; to gesticulate; to act as a fugleman or guide (A leader, especially a political leader.)</li>
<li><strong>fulguration</strong> – To emit flashes of lightning</li>
<li><strong>fulsome</strong> – 1. Excessively flattering or insincerely earnest; sycophantic; 2. disgusting or offensive</li>
<li><strong>fungible</strong> – Interchangeable</li>
<li><strong>fungo</strong> – The act of tossing the ball upwards and hitting it as it descends, a ball hit in this manner or the light bat used to hit such balls</li>
<li><strong>furbelow</strong> – 1. A ruffle or flounce on a garment; 2. piece of showy ornamentation</li>
<li><strong>furze</strong> – Gorse; spiny evergreen shrubs</li>
<li><strong>fustic</strong> – The wood of a large, tropical American tree, Chlorophora tinctoria, of the mulberry family, yielding a light yellow dye.</li>
<li><strong>gaff</strong> – Barbed spear; stick with a hook on it</li>
<li><strong>gaffer</strong> – An electrician in charge of lighting on a movie or television set</li>
<li><strong>Galen</strong> – Greek anatomist, physician, and philosopher. His theories, which emphasized maintaining a balance of the four humors, formed the basis of European medicine until the Renaissance</li>
<li><strong>Galicia</strong> – A region of east-central Europe on the north side of the Carpathians, now in SE Poland and Ukraine</li>
<li><strong>galliass</strong> – A large, fast, heavily armed three-masted Mediterranean galley of the 1500s and 1600s (var. of <em>galleas</em>)</li>
<li><strong>gallimaufry</strong> – A jumble; a hodgepodge</li>
<li><strong>gamelan</strong> – An Indonesian orchestra composed mainly of tuned percussion instruments such as bamboo xylophones, wooden or metal chimes, and gongs</li>
<li><strong>garganey</strong> – A small migratory duck (Anas querquedula) that breeds in Eurasia and has a white stripe over each eye.</li>
<li><strong>gastrocnemius</strong> – The largest, most prominent muscle of the calf of the leg, the action of which extends the foot and bends the knee</li>
<li><strong>gatka</strong> – An Indian martial art associated with the Sikhs of the Punjab</li>
<li><strong>gauleiter</strong> – A person in a position of petty or local authority who behaves in an overbearing authoritarian manner (from a provincial governor in Germany under Hitler)</li>
<li><strong>gavage</strong> – Introduction of nutritive material into the stomach by means of a tube.</li>
<li><strong>gazump</strong> – To swindle or overcharge</li>
<li><strong>Gehenna</strong> – 1. A place or state of torment or suffering. 2. The abode of condemned souls; hell</li>
<li><strong>gelastician</strong> – One who causes laughter</li>
<li><strong>gentian</strong> – Any gentianaceous plant having blue, yellow, white, or red showy flowers</li>
<li><strong>gentilic</strong> – Derived from a place name that depicts the residents of that place; see <em>demonym</em></li>
<li><strong>geoid</strong> – The hypothetical surface of the earth that coincides everywhere with mean sea level.</li>
<li><strong>ghat</strong> – Stairs or a passage leading down to a river (from the Hindi)</li>
<li><strong>gigue</strong> – A synonym for jig</li>
<li><strong>girn</strong> – To complain; to snarl or grimace (also <em>gurn</em>)</li>
<li><strong>gisarme</strong> – A halberd with a long shaft and two-sided blade, carried by medieval foot soldiers.</li>
<li><strong>glaive</strong> – A sword, especially a broadsword.</li>
<li><strong>glaucous</strong> – 1. Of a pale grayish or bluish green; 2. covered with a bluish waxy or powdery bloom</li>
<li><strong>glean</strong> – To gather (something) slowly and carefully in small pieces (comes from the word for gathering useful remnants of a crop from a field after a harvest)</li>
<li><strong>glymphatic</strong> – A functional waste clearance pathway for the vertebrate central nervous system.</li>
<li><strong>glyptothek</strong> – A collection of sculptures; also known as a <em>Glyptotheque</em></li>
<li><strong>gnomic</strong> – Marked by aphorisms; aphoristic; tersely phrases e.g., using adages</li>
<li><strong>godown</strong> – Warehouse (esp. in India)</li>
<li><strong>goffer</strong> – An iron used for pressing ridges or narrow pleats, or ridges or pleats produced in this manner</li>
<li><strong>goliards</strong> – Mainly 12th-century scholar-poets interested mainly in earthly delights.</li>
<li><strong>gonfalon</strong> – A banner hung from a crosspiece, like in the Crusades</li>
<li><strong>gouache</strong> – A method of painting with opaque watercolors mixed with a preparation of gum.</li>
<li><strong>gound</strong> – The gunk that collects in the corners of the eyes</li>
<li><strong>gowpen</strong> – A bowl formed by two hands (Scottish)</li>
<li><strong>grace-and-favour</strong> – A house, flat, etc. owned by the sovereign and granted free of rent to a person to whom the sovereign wishes to express gratitude</li>
<li><strong>gracile</strong> – Gracefully slender</li>
<li><strong>gravamen</strong> – Material substance of a charge or complaint</li>
<li><strong>greaves</strong> – Shin armor/guards</li>
<li><strong>grebe</strong> – Any of various swimming and diving birds of the family Podicipedidae, having a pointed bill and lobed, fleshy membranes along each toe.</li>
<li><strong>greenmail</strong> – The practice of a company buying sufficient shares in another company to threaten takeover and making a quick profit as a result of the threatened company buying back its shares at a higher price</li>
<li><strong>griot</strong> – A member of a caste responsible for maintaining an oral record of tribal history in the form of music, poetry, and storytelling (chiefly in Western Africa)</li>
<li><strong>grisaille</strong> – A style of monochromatic painting in shades of gray</li>
<li><strong>grizzle</strong> – To make or become gray</li>
<li><strong>groat</strong> – An English silver coin worth four pennies, taken out of circulation in the 17th century</li>
<li><strong>groyne</strong> – Variant of groin</li>
<li><strong>grutch</strong> – To grudge; to begrudge</li>
<li><strong>gudgen</strong> – Pivot; hinge; small fish; one who is easily duped (page 86 of the <em>Brothers Karamazov</em>)</li>
<li><strong>guerdon</strong> – A reward; recompense</li>
<li><strong>guipure</strong> – A coarse large-patterned lace without a net background. Also called Venice lace.</li>
<li><strong>gurn</strong> – To complain, snarl or grimace (also <em>girn</em>; from the Scottish)</li>
<li><strong>gyoza</strong> – A pocket of dough that is stuffed, as with minced pork or shrimp, and fried, steamed, or boiled.</li>
<li><strong>gyp</strong> – A fraud or swindle, or some who perpetrates same</li>
<li><strong>ha-ha</strong> – A wall or other boundary marker that is set in a ditch so as not to interrupt the landscape</li>
<li><strong>habergeon</strong> – A short, sleeveless coat of mail; a hauberk.</li>
<li><strong>haboob</strong> – A penetrating sandstorm or dust storm with violent winds, occurring chiefly in Arabia, North Africa, and India.</li>
<li><strong>haecceity</strong> – The property that uniquely identifies an object</li>
<li><strong>hagridden</strong> – Tormented or harassed by nightmares or unreasonable fears</li>
<li><strong>halvah</strong> – A confection of Turkish origin, made chiefly of ground sesame seeds and honey</li>
<li><strong>hamartia</strong> – A tragic flaw; the flaw in character which leads to the downfall of the protagonist in a tragedy (e.g. Achilles’s heel)</li>
<li><strong>hapax legomenon</strong> – A word or form that occurs only once in the recorded corpus of a given language.</li>
<li><strong>hardtack</strong> – A hard biscuit or bread made with only flour and water. Also called sea biscuit, sea bread, ship biscuit</li>
<li><strong>haruspicy</strong> – Divination by natural means (e.g. lightning)</li>
<li><strong>hauberk</strong> – A long tunic made of chain mail</li>
<li><strong>haustorium</strong> – A specialized structure of a parasitic fungus or plant, used to absorb nutrients and water from the host plant.</li>
<li><strong>hawse</strong> – The part of a ship where the hawseholes are located; The space between the bows and anchors of an anchored ship.</li>
<li><strong>hebephrenic</strong> – A type of schizophrenia characterized by disorganized speech and behavior, flat or inappropriate affect, and sometimes silly or inappropriate mannerisms.</li>
<li><strong>hecatomb</strong> – A large-scale sacrifice or slaughter</li>
<li><strong>heliotrope</strong> – Any of various plants that turn toward the sun</li>
<li><strong>helotry</strong> – The condition of serfdom</li>
<li><strong>helve</strong> – A handle of a tool, such as an axe, chisel, or hammer.</li>
<li><strong>hendecagon</strong> – A polygon having eleven sides</li>
<li><strong>heresiarch</strong> – One who originates or is the chief proponent of a heresy or heretical movement</li>
<li><strong>hermeneutics</strong> – Theory of interpretation (esp. religious texts); determining the meaning of something</li>
<li><strong>heterachy</strong> – A formal structure (e.g. connected nodes) without any single permanent uppermost node</li>
<li><strong>heteroclite</strong> – an irregularly formed word; irregular or unusual</li>
<li><strong>heterophemize</strong> – To say something different from what you mean to say (e.g. as a false compliment)</li>
<li><strong>hetman</strong> – A Cossack chief; also called <em>ataman</em></li>
<li><strong>hetmanate</strong> – All of the hetmans</li>
<li><strong>hiatal</strong> – Of, pertaining to, or involving a hiatus</li>
<li><strong>hierophant</strong> – An interpreter of sacred mysteries or arcane knowledge</li>
<li><strong>Hijri</strong> – The lunar calendar used by Muslims and reckoned from a.d. 622: the calendar year consists of 354 days and contains 12 months.</li>
<li><strong>hippocras</strong> – Wine flavored with spices</li>
<li><strong>homoeomery</strong> – The state or quality of being homogeneous in elements or first principles; likeness or identity of parts. (also <em>Homoeomery</em>)</li>
<li><strong>homologate</strong> – To approve, especially to confirm officially.</li>
<li><strong>horologium</strong> – A clock tower.</li>
<li><strong>horripilated</strong> – Having goosebumps from either fear or cold or excitement</li>
<li><strong>hortative</strong> – Urging to some course of conduct or action; exhorting; encouraging</li>
<li><strong>howdah</strong> – A seat for riding on an elephant&rsquo;s back, esp. one with a canopy</li>
<li><strong>hoyden</strong> – Tomboy; a boisterous, high-spirited, saucy girl</li>
<li><strong>huckster</strong> – A person who sells small items door-to-door or from a stall</li>
<li><strong>humect</strong> – To moisten; to wet</li>
<li><strong>hunker</strong> – To squat on one&rsquo;s heels (a synonym from Bill Burr: <em>Vietnamese gambler squat</em>)</li>
<li><strong>hustings</strong> – A place where political campaign speeches are made (chiefly British)</li>
<li><strong>hyaline</strong> – Resembling glass, as in translucence or transparency; glassy</li>
<li><strong>hypaethral</strong> – Wholly or partly open to the sky</li>
<li><strong>hypertelorism</strong> – Abnormal distance between two paired organs, esp. the eyes</li>
<li><strong>hypocaust</strong> – A space under the floor of an ancient Roman building through which flue gases from a furnace were passed to heat a room or a bath.</li>
<li><strong>hypostatis</strong> – The substance, essence, or underlying reality; any of the three persons of the Christian Trinity.</li>
<li><strong>latifundium</strong> – A large landed estate, especially of the ancient Romans.</li>
<li><strong>iatrogenic</strong> – Unintentionally induced by a physician</li>
<li><strong>icteric</strong> – Related to jaundice (to be ill with or a treatment)</li>
<li><strong>idiolect</strong> – Unique linquistic pattern with a small group; mini-dialect</li>
<li><strong>illeism</strong> – Referring to oneself in the third person</li>
<li><strong>imbricate</strong> – To overlap in a regular pattern; also used as <em>imbrication</em> to signify metaphorical layers of overlap between information domains.</li>
<li><strong>immanent</strong> – Inherent</li>
<li><strong>impecuniousness</strong> – The state of being poor; penury</li>
<li><strong>impecunity</strong> – The state of being poor; penury</li>
<li><strong>impetigo</strong> – A contagious bacterial skin disease characterized by the formation of pustules that develop into yellowish crusty sores</li>
<li><strong>impluvious</strong> – Wet with rain</li>
<li><strong>incalescent</strong> – Growing hotter or more ardent</li>
<li><strong>incarnadine</strong> – Of a fleshy pink color; blood-red</li>
<li><strong>incunabulum</strong> – An artifact of an early period (artifact of an early period); pl: <em>incunabula</em>; also known as <em>incunables</em>.</li>
<li><strong>indiscerpible</strong> – Not discerpible; inseparable</li>
<li><strong>indite</strong> – To set down in writing; to compose</li>
<li><strong>infundibulum</strong> – Any of various funnel-shaped bodily passages, openings, structures, or parts, esp. the stalk of the pituitary gland</li>
<li><strong>infusoria</strong> – Various microscopic organisms found in infusions of decaying organic matter</li>
<li><strong>ingenuous</strong> – Candid; lacking in guile</li>
<li><strong>inimical</strong> – Injurious or harmful in effect; adverse; unfriendly or hostile</li>
<li><strong>inspissate</strong> – To thicken, as by evaporation</li>
<li><strong>instauration</strong> – Renovation; restoration.</li>
<li><strong>intarsia</strong> – A decorative inlaid pattern in a surface, esp. a mosaic worked in wood</li>
<li><strong>indendant</strong> – An administrative official (such as a governor); director or manager in German</li>
<li><strong>inselberg</strong> – A mountain or rocky mass that has resisted erosion and stands isolated in an essentially level area. Also called a <em>monadnock</em>.</li>
<li><strong>instauration</strong> –  The institution or establishment of something.</li>
<li><strong>intercalated</strong> – Interpolate in a calendar.</li>
<li><strong>intercostal</strong> – Located or occurring between the ribs.</li>
<li><strong>interpellate</strong> – To question (a member of the government) on a point of government policy, often interrupting the business of the day</li>
<li><strong>interpellation</strong> – An act of delaying or interrupting the continuity; see <em>interpellate</em></li>
<li><strong>intransitive</strong> – An intransitive verb, on the other hand, describes an action that does not happen to something or someone</li>
<li><strong>inveigle</strong> – To obtain by cajolery; seduce</li>
<li><strong>inverter</strong> – Any device for converting a direct current into an alternating current</li>
<li><strong>invidious</strong> – Inciting ill will; troll-y; discriminatory; envious; </li>
<li><strong>invigilator</strong> – Monitor or proctor who watches examination candidates to prevent cheating</li>
<li><strong>ipseity</strong> – The quality of being oneself or itself; the essentia] element of identity</li>
<li><strong>irenic</strong> – Promoting peace; conciliatory.</li>
<li><strong>irredentism</strong> – A national policy advocating the acquisition of some region in another country by reason of common linguistic, cultural, historical, ethnic, or racial ties.</li>
<li><strong>irrefragably</strong> – Admittedly; fairly</li>
<li><strong>jabot</strong> – An ornamental cascade of ruffles or frills down the front of a shirt, blouse, or dress.</li>
<li><strong>jasper</strong> – An opaque cryptocrystalline variety of quartz that may be red, yellow, or brown</li>
<li><strong>jejune</strong> – Naive, simplistic, or superficial</li>
<li><strong>jequirity</strong> – Indian liquorice seeds; used to make black rosary beads</li>
<li><strong>jouissance</strong> – Jollity; merriment</li>
<li><strong>katabatic</strong> – Of or relating to the downward flow of cold dense air</li>
<li><strong>keck</strong> – To retch or feel nausea; to feel or express disgust</li>
<li><strong>kedgeree</strong> – 1. A dish of India containing rice, lentils, and spices. 2. a dish of rice, fish, hard-boiled eggs, cream, and seasonings</li>
<li><strong>kedge</strong> – A light anchor used for warping a vessel; to warp (move) a vessel by means of a light anchor.</li>
<li><strong>kefir</strong> – A creamy drink made of fermented cow&rsquo;s milk</li>
<li><strong>keloid</strong> – An abnormal proliferation of scar tissue, often pink, as on the site of a surgical incision</li>
<li><strong>kenning</strong> – A conventional poetic phrase used for or in addition to the usual name of a person or thing, esp. in Old Norse and Old English verse, as wave traveler for boat; see <em>metonymy</em></li>
<li><strong>kermess</strong> – A fair or church dedication</li>
<li><strong>kipper</strong> – A herring or salmon that has been split, salted, and smoked</li>
<li><strong>kirtle</strong> – 1. A man&rsquo;s knee-length tunic or coat; 2. a woman’s dress or skirt</li>
<li><strong>knelling</strong> – The process of disassembling something and arranging its parts</li>
<li><strong>knolling</strong> – A photography technique that arranges objects at 90 degree angles and shoots them from above. </li>
<li>kurgan	An ancient burial mound constructed over a pit grave: earliest occurrence 4th millennium b.c., in the Russian Steppes.</li>
<li><strong>kulak</strong> – A prosperous landed peasant in czarist Russia, characterized by the Communists during the October Revolution as an exploiter</li>
<li><strong>kukri</strong> – A knife with a curved blade that broadens towards the point, esp. as used by Gurkhas</li>
<li><strong>kvass</strong> – A Russian fermented beverage similar to beer, made from rye or barley</li>
<li><strong>kwashiorkor</strong> – Severe malnutrition of infants and young children, esp. soon after weaning, resulting from dietary deficiency of protein (comes from the Ghanan)</li>
<li><strong>kyriarchy</strong> – A social system or set of connecting social systems built around domination, oppression, and submission (used in feminist theory)</li>
<li><strong>lability</strong> – The susceptibility to error or lapses of any kind, as a human failing</li>
<li><strong>laburnum</strong> – Any leguminous tree or shrub of the Eurasian genus Laburnum, having clusters of yellow drooping flowers: all parts of the plant are poisonous</li>
<li><strong>laconically</strong> – Marked by terseness or concision</li>
<li><strong>lacuna</strong> – An empty space or a missing part; a gap</li>
<li><strong>lagniappe</strong> – A small gift given with a purchase</li>
<li><strong>lahar</strong> – A mass of volcanic fragments, often mixed with water (e.g. rain), moving rapidly down the side of a volcano</li>
<li><strong>lamasery</strong> – In Tibetan Buddhism, a monastery presided over by a lama.</li>
<li><strong>lambent</strong> – Flickering lightly (e.g. firelight); glowing with soft radiance, luminous</li>
<li><strong>lapalissade</strong> – An obvious, self-evident truth, especially humorously so; a tautology or truism.</li>
<li><strong>laparotomy</strong> – A surgical procedure involving small incisions through the abdominal wall to gain access into the abdominal cavity.</li>
<li><strong>lapidary</strong> – fd drawknives</li>
<li><strong>lapillus</strong> – A small, solidified fragment of lava (pl. <em>lapilli</em>)</li>
<li><strong>lapis lazuli</strong> – An opaque to translucent blue, violet-blue, or greenish-blue semiprecious gemstone composed mainly of lazurite and calcite.</li>
<li><strong>larrikin</strong> – A person given to comical or outlandish behavior; an imp; a hooligan (chiefly <em>Australian</em>)</li>
<li><strong>lascar</strong> – An East Indian sailor, army servant, or artillery trooper during the era of European colonialism in Asia</li>
<li><strong>laterality</strong> – Preference in using one side of the body over the other.</li>
<li><strong>laterite</strong> – A red residual soil formed by the leaching of silica and by the enrichment with aluminum and iron oxides, esp. in humid climates</li>
<li><strong>latibulate</strong> – To hide oneself in a corner</li>
<li><strong>leal</strong> – Loyal and honest</li>
<li><strong>lenition</strong> – To undergo an increase in sonority or become lenis. Said of consonant sounds, as when (p) changes to (b), (b) to (v)</li>
<li><strong>lenity</strong> – The condition or quality of being lenient; leniency</li>
<li><strong>Lepus</strong> – A constellation in the Southern Hemisphere near Orion and Columba</li>
<li><strong>letabund</strong> – Filled with joy</li>
<li><strong>Levallois</strong> – A filet-working technique in which a flint is trimmed so that a flake of predetermined size and shape can be struck from it</li>
<li><strong>leyden jars</strong> – An early form of capacitor consisting of a glass jar lined inside and out with tinfoil and having a conducting rod connected to the inner foil lining and passing out of the jar through an insulated stopper</li>
<li><strong>lictor</strong> – A Roman functionary who carried fasces when attending a magistrate in public appearances</li>
<li><strong>lief</strong> – Beloved; ready or willing</li>
<li><strong>limerence</strong> – Puppy love; a state of mind resulting from romantic attraction, characterized by feelings of euphoria, the desire to have one&rsquo;s feelings reciprocated, etc</li>
<li><strong>liminal</strong> – Intermediate between two states, conditions, or regions; transitional or indeterminate</li>
<li><strong>lisle</strong> – A fine, smooth, tightly twisted thread spun from long-staple cotton</li>
<li><strong>lithotomy</strong> – Surgery to remove one or more stones from an organ or duct</li>
<li><strong>litotes</strong> – Understating by negation: no mean feat&rdquo;</li>
<li><strong>littoral</strong> – A coastal region; a shore; the region or zone between the limits of high and low tides.</li>
<li><strong>locus</strong> – A locality; a place</li>
<li><strong>longueur</strong> – 1. A tedious passage in a work of literature or performing art; 2. a period of time filled with boredom or tedium</li>
<li><strong>lorgnette</strong> – A pair of eyeglasses or opera glasses mounted on a handle</li>
<li><strong>louche</strong> – Disreputable or sordid</li>
<li><strong>lubricious</strong> – Overtly sexual; salacious</li>
<li><strong>lucubrations</strong> – Writing or study; meditations</li>
<li><strong>ludic</strong> – Showing spontaneous and undirected playfulness</li>
<li><strong>lues</strong> – Any venereal disease (e.g. Syphilis); pestilence</li>
<li><strong>lumbago</strong> – A painful condition of the lower back, as one resulting from muscle strain or a slipped disk</li>
<li><strong>lupanarian</strong> – Pertaining to a brothel or prostitution; characteristic of illicit sexual desire or activity. (Also, <em>lupinarian</em>)</li>
<li><strong>lyceum</strong> – A hall in which public lectures, concerts, and similar programs are presented</li>
<li><strong>machicolation</strong> – A projecting gallery at the top of a castle wall, supported by a row of corbels and having openings in the floor through which stones and boiling liquids could be dropped on attackers (<em>machiolate</em>: to construct machicolations)</li>
<li><strong>macrocarpa</strong> – A large coniferous tree of New Zealand, Cupressus macrocarpa, used for shelter belts on farms and for rough timber. Also called: Monterey cypress</li>
<li><strong>maculate</strong> – <em>(v):</em> To spot, blemish, or pollute; <em>(n):</em> 1. Spotted, blotched, or stained. 2. Morally sullied or impure</li>
<li><strong>madding</strong> – Acting madly; frenzied</li>
<li><strong>maenad</strong> – 1. A frenzied woman; 2. a female member of the orgiastic cult of Dionysus</li>
<li><strong>magniloquent</strong> – Using high-flown or bombastic language.</li>
<li><strong>majolica</strong> – Italian earthenware covered with an opaque glaze of tin oxide and usu. highly decorated</li>
<li><strong>malesuete </strong> – Accustomed to poor habits</li>
<li><strong>malversation</strong> – Misbehavior and esp. corruption in an office, trust, or commission; corrupt administration</li>
<li><strong>mandala</strong> – Any of various designs symbolizing the universe, usually circular</li>
<li><strong>mandamus</strong> – A writ issued by a court requiring a public official or entity to perform a duty associated with that office or entity</li>
<li><strong>manqué</strong> – 1. Unfulfilled; potential; would-be; 2. Unfulfilled or frustrated in the realization of one&rsquo;s ambitions or capabilities</li>
<li><strong>manumission</strong> – To free from slavery or bondage; emancipate</li>
<li><strong>manumit/manumission</strong> – To set free; release from slavery</li>
<li><strong>martingale</strong> – Part of a bridle; half-belt on the back of a coat; doubling the stakes after each loss; stability rigging for the bowsprit or jib (see <a href="http://www.thefreedictionary.com/martingale">definition</a>)</li>
<li><strong>mascaron</strong> – A face, usually human, sometimes frightening or chimeric, whose alleged function was originally to frighten away evil spirits so that they would not enter the building.</li>
<li><strong>mascon</strong> – Any of several lunar regions of high gravity</li>
<li><strong>mataiotechnical</strong> – A skill that requires great patience and dedication to complete, but that, once completed, still amounts to nothing. It is impressive, but meaningless.</li>
<li><strong>mattock</strong> – A digging tool with a flat blade set at right angles to the handle.</li>
<li><strong>matutinal</strong> – Of, relating to, or occurring in the morning; early</li>
<li><strong>megatherium</strong> – A large, extinct ground sloth that lived from the Miocene through the Pleistocene Epochs, primarily in South America. It was as large as an elephant, had long curved claws, and ate plants</li>
<li><strong>mereology</strong> – The formal study of the logical properties of the relation of part and whole</li>
<li><strong>meretricious</strong> – Gaudy</li>
<li><strong>merkin</strong> – A pubic wig</li>
<li><strong>merlon</strong> – The solid portion between crenels</li>
<li><strong>mésalliance</strong> – A marriage with a person of inferior social position.</li>
<li><strong>mesoscopic</strong> – Pertaining to a size regime, intermediate between the microscopic and the macroscopic, that is characteristic of a region where a large number of particles can interact in a quantum-mechanically correlated fashion.</li>
<li><strong>metempsychosis</strong> – The theory of reincarnation</li>
<li><strong>metonym</strong> – A word used in metonymy</li>
<li><strong>metonymy</strong> – A synonym/metaphor; e.g. “brass&rdquo; for upper officers or &ldquo;plastic&rdquo; for credit cards; see <em>kenning</em></li>
<li><strong>mews</strong> – A group of buildings containing private stables that have been converted to residences</li>
<li><strong>mezzanine</strong> – A low story between two others in a building</li>
<li><strong>miasma</strong> – An unwholesome or oppressive atmosphere</li>
<li><strong>micrognathia</strong> – Abnormally small jaw</li>
<li><strong>micturition</strong> – urination; also, micturate</li>
<li><strong>milt</strong> – The sperm-containing fluid of a male fish</li>
<li><strong>mimetic</strong> – Of or relating to an imitation; imitative</li>
<li><strong>minatory</strong> – Of a menacing or threatening nature; <em>minacious</em></li>
<li><strong>Mindanao</strong> – Second largest of the Philippine islands, NE of Borneo</li>
<li><strong>mirabile dictu</strong> – Wonderful to relate; amazing to say</li>
<li><strong>misericord</strong> – 1. Relaxation of monastic rules, as a dispensation from fasting. 2. A bracket attached to the underside of a hinged seat in a church stall on which a standing person may lean. Also called <em>miserere</em> 3. A narrow dagger used in medieval times to deliver the death stroke to a seriously wounded knight.</li>
<li><strong>misfeasance</strong> – Improper and unlawful execution of an act that in itself is lawful and proper.</li>
<li><strong>misprision</strong> – Neglect in performing the duties of public office.</li>
<li><strong>moidore</strong> – A former Portuguese gold coin</li>
<li><strong>moiety</strong> – One half</li>
<li><strong>mojibake</strong> – The garbled text that is the result of text being decoded using an unintended character encoding.</li>
<li><strong>Moloch</strong> – Something possessing the power to exact severe sacrifice; a Semitic deity to whom parents sacrificed their children</li>
<li><strong>monadnock</strong> – See <em>inselberg</em>.</li>
<li><strong>mondegreen</strong> – Misinterpretation of song lyrics (e.g. Israeli Men&rdquo; instead of &ldquo;It&rsquo;s Raining Men&rdquo;)&rdquo;</li>
<li><strong>monkey-puzzle</strong> – A coniferous evergreen tree (Araucaria araucana) native to Chile and Argentina, having whorled branches covered with scalelike, overlapping, sharp-pointed leaves.</li>
<li><strong>monomachy</strong> – Single combat, or a duel</li>
<li><strong>Monophysite</strong> – A person who holds that there is only one nature in the person of Christ, which is primarily divine with human attributes</li>
<li><strong>monopsony</strong> – A situation in which the entire market demand for a product or service consists of only one buyer</li>
<li><strong>monophthongization</strong> – A sound change by which a diphthong becomes a monophthong, a type of vowel shift</li>
<li><strong>morbific</strong> – Causing disease; pathogenic</li>
<li><strong>morganatic</strong> – A marriage between nobility and lower rank, where titles and wealth are not shared</li>
<li><strong>morion</strong> – A crested metal helmet; black or blackish-brown smoky quartz</li>
<li><strong>morphetic</strong> – Of or relating to sleep or dreams</li>
<li><strong>motet</strong> – A polyphonic composition based on a sacred text and usually sung without accompaniment.</li>
<li><strong>moufflon</strong> – A small wild sheep</li>
<li><strong>moulinet</strong> – A circular cut or swing of the sword</li>
<li><strong>mountebank</strong> – A flamboyant charlatan</li>
<li><strong>mucopus</strong> – A mucopurulent discharge; a mixture of mucous material and pus.</li>
<li><strong>mudra</strong> – Ritual hand movements in Hindu religious dancing</li>
<li><strong>mulct</strong> – 1. To penalize by fining or demanding forfeiture; 2. to cheat or defraud</li>
<li><strong>mulga</strong> – The outback; bush</li>
<li><strong>mullein</strong> – Any of various Eurasian plants of the genus Verbascum of the figwort family, especially V. thapsus, naturalized in North America, having a tall spike of yellow flowers and leaves covered with dense woolly down.</li>
<li><strong>mullet</strong> – Freshwater, spiny-finned fish</li>
<li><strong>mullion</strong> – A vertical member, as of stone or wood, dividing a window or other opening.</li>
<li><strong>Munda</strong> – A family of languages spoken by scattered peoples throughout central India</li>
<li><strong>murine</strong> – A family of rodents that includes mice and rats</li>
<li><strong>murrain</strong> – Redwater fever, affecting livestock; a plague, epidemic or crop blight</li>
<li><strong>muskeg</strong> – A peat bog formed by an accumulation of sphagnum moss, leaves, and decayed matter, often with scattered small trees, and found especially in northern North America.</li>
<li><strong>musquash</strong> – Another name for muskrat</li>
<li><strong>musth</strong> – A periodic state of heightened sexual activity and aggression in adult male elephants, characterized by the discharge of secretions from glands near the eyes and the continuous dribbling of urine.</li>
<li><strong>mutatis mutandis</strong> – The necessary changes having been made (e.g. when applying a concept from one domain to another, e.g. maritime law to space travel)</li>
<li><strong>myocyclonic</strong> – Of or relating to a sudden irregular twitching of muscles or parts of muscles, occurring in various brain disorders</li>
<li><strong>myrmidon</strong> – Soldier or a subordinate civil officer who executes orders of a superior without protest or pity; – sometimes applied to bailiffs, constables, etc.</li>
<li><strong>mythopoeic</strong> – Serving to create or engender myths; productive in mythmaking</li>
<li><strong>nankeen</strong> – A sturdy yellow or buff cotton cloth (or trousers made of same).</li>
<li><strong>naphthalene</strong> – A white crystalline volatile solid with a characteristic penetrating odour: an aromatic hydrocarbon used in mothballs and in the manufacture of dyes, explosives</li>
<li><strong>natality</strong> – Birthrate</li>
<li><strong>natant</strong> – Floating or swimming in water</li>
<li><strong>navvy</strong> – A laborer, esp. one employed in construction or excavation projects</li>
<li><strong>neep</strong> – A dialect name for a turnip, chiefly British</li>
<li><strong>nefandous</strong> – Too odious to be spoken of</li>
<li><strong>nenuphar</strong> – Either a white or yellow water lily</li>
<li><strong>neotenous</strong> – The retention of juvenile characteristics in the adults of a species, as among certain amphibians.</li>
<li><strong>nepenthe</strong> – Something that induces forgetfulness of sorrow or eases pain (mentioned in the <em>Odyssey</em>)</li>
<li><strong>nephrologist</strong> – Specialist in conditions related to the kidney</li>
<li><strong>nescience</strong> – Ignorance; absence of awareness</li>
<li><strong>Nestorianism</strong> – The doctrine that Christ was two distinct persons, divine and human, implying a denial that the Virgin Mary was the mother of God. It is attributed to Nestorius and survives in the Iraqi Church</li>
<li><strong>netty</strong> – A lavatory, originally an earth closet (chiefly British)</li>
<li><strong>neuralgic</strong> – Sharp, severe paroxysmal pain extending along a nerve or group of nerves</li>
<li><strong>nevus</strong> – Any congenital anomaly of the skin, including moles and various types of birthmarks; also <em>naevus</em></li>
<li><strong>nightjar</strong> – Any of numerous nocturnal goatsuckers of the subfamily Caprimulginae, having a short bill and a wide mouth used for scooping up insects in midflight; they have a cryptic plumage and large eyes and feed on insects</li>
<li><strong>niello</strong> – A black metallic alloy (sulfur and copper, silver or lead</li>
<li><strong>nigrescent</strong> – Blackish; dark</li>
<li><strong>noctilucent</strong> – Luminous at night</li>
<li><strong>noddle</strong> –  <em>n:</em> The head or brains, chiefly British; <em>v:</em> to nod (the head), as through drowsiness</li>
<li><strong>noetics</strong> – The laws of logic; the science of the intellect.</li>
<li><strong>noisome</strong> – x</li>
<li><strong>nolens volens</strong> – Whether willing or not; for better or worse</li>
<li><strong>nonplused</strong> – Filled with bewilderment</li>
<li><strong>noosphere</strong> – The part of the biosphere that is affected by human thought, culture, and knowledge</li>
<li><strong>nosology</strong> – The science of classification of diseases</li>
<li><strong>numeraire</strong> – A unit or an item of commerce in which prices are measured</li>
<li><strong>numinous</strong> – awe-inspiring, mysterious or spiritual; supernatural</li>
<li><strong>nibble</strong> – Four bits; also <em>semi-octet</em>, <em>quadbit</em>, or <em>quartet</em>; Brit: <em>nybble</em></li>
<li><strong>nystagmus</strong> – A persistent, rapid, involuntary side-to-side eye movement</li>
<li><strong>oakum</strong> – A preparation of tarred fibers used to seal gaps, esp. in boats</li>
<li><strong>obeah</strong> – 1. A form of belief involving sorcery, practiced in parts of the West Indies, South America, the southern U.S., and Africa. 2. A fetish or charm used in practicing obeah.</li>
<li><strong>obganiate</strong> – To annoy by repeating over and over and over and over</li>
<li><strong>objurgate</strong> – To scold or rebuke sharply; berate.</li>
<li><strong>oblation</strong> – Any offering made for religious or charitable purposes (e.g. offering of the bread and wine of the Eucharist to God)</li>
<li><strong>obloquy</strong> – 1. calumny; detractive language; 2. ill repute</li>
<li><strong>obovate</strong> – Egg-shaped and flat, with the narrow end at the base</li>
<li><strong>obscurantist</strong> – Practicing deliberate vagueness</li>
<li><strong>obsequies</strong> – Funeral or burial rites (singular: <em>obsequy</em>)</li>
<li><strong>obsidional</strong> – Relating to a siege</li>
<li><strong>occiput</strong> – Back of the head</li>
<li><strong>ocherous</strong> – Ocher in color (or a mineral used to make that color)</li>
<li><strong>octarine</strong> – The Color of Magic or the King Color, the eighth color of the Discworld spectrum, visible only to wizards and cats, a greenish purple yellow color. </li>
<li><strong>ofay</strong> – A derogatory term for a White person (see <em>cracker</em>, <em>honky</em>, <em>peckerwood</em>)</li>
<li><strong>ogee</strong> – A double curve, resembling an S, formed by the union of a concave and a convex line (often a molding or arch in this shape)</li>
<li><strong>ogive</strong> – A diagonal rib or groin of a Gothic vault; 2. A distribution curve in which the frequencies are cumulative</li>
<li><strong>okrug</strong> – A type of administrative division in some Slavic-speaking states.</li>
<li><strong>oligopsony</strong> – A market with only very few buyers</li>
<li><strong>oliphant</strong> – Elephant</li>
<li><strong>omphalic</strong> – Of or relating to the navel</li>
<li><strong>omphaloskepsis</strong> – Literally, the contemplation of one&rsquo;s navel, which is an idiom usually meaning complacent self-absorption</li>
<li><strong>oneiric</strong> – Dream-like</li>
<li><strong>onomastics</strong> – The study of the etymology, history, and use of proper names</li>
<li><strong>ontogenesis</strong> – The development of an individual organism or a part of an organism from inception to maturity.</li>
<li><strong>ontology</strong> – The study of the essence of being</li>
<li><strong>opprobrium</strong> – Ignominy; cause of shame or disgrace</li>
<li><strong>opsimath</strong> – A person who learns late in life</li>
<li><strong>optative</strong> – Indicating or expressing choice, preference, or wish</li>
<li><strong>orgulous</strong> – Haughty; proud (<em>archaic</em>)</li>
<li><strong>orison</strong> – A prayer, a devout petition to God or an object of worship</li>
<li><strong>orogenesis</strong> – The process of mountain formation, esp. by a folding and faulting of the earth&rsquo;s crust</li>
<li><strong>orotund</strong> – Pompous and bombastic; resonant; booming</li>
<li><strong>orthography</strong> – The art or study of correct spelling according to established usage</li>
<li><strong>orthophemistic</strong> – Plainly denotative; not euphemistic or dysphemistic</li>
<li><strong>osculation</strong> – A kiss (page 332 of <em>Doctor Sleep</em>)</li>
<li><strong>osier</strong> – Any of several willows having long rodlike twigs used in basketry; A twig of one of these shrubs or trees.</li>
<li><strong>osmically</strong> – Of or relating to odors or the sense of smell</li>
<li><strong>osteitis</strong> – Inflammation of bone or bony tissue</li>
<li><strong>ostler</strong> – Man who looks after horses at an inn</li>
<li><strong>otiose</strong> –  Lazy; indolent; serving no useful purpose</li>
<li><strong>otoconia</strong> – Minute calcareous particles in the gelatinous membrane surmounting the macula in the inner ear; also <em>statoconia</em>, <em>otoliths</em>, or <em>statoliths</em></li>
<li><strong>oviparous</strong> – Producing eggs lain outside of the body</li>
<li><strong>paillasse</strong> – A straw-filled mat or mattress (var. of palliasse) </li>
<li><strong>palapa</strong> – A structure, such as a bar or restaurant in a tropical resort, that is open-sided and thatched with palm leaves.</li>
<li><strong>palimpsest</strong> – A manuscript, typically of papyrus or parchment, that has been written on more than once, with the earlier writing incompletely scraped off or erased and often legible.</li>
<li><strong>palingenesis</strong> – The doctrine of transmigration of souls; metempsychosis; the supposed repetition by an organism during its embryonic development of the stages in the evolution of its species, as asserted by the discredited biogenetic law</li>
<li><strong>Palio</strong> – Italian Renaissance or Medieval festival</li>
<li><strong>Palladian</strong> – Of, relating to, or characterized by wisdom or study</li>
<li><strong>palliasse</strong> – A straw-filled mat or mattress (var. of paillasse)</li>
<li><strong>palp</strong> – Either of a pair of sensory appendages that arise from the mouthparts of crustaceans and insects</li>
<li><strong>pandit</strong> – Brahmin scholar</li>
<li><strong>panicle</strong> – A loosely branched inflorescence, especially a branching raceme.</li>
<li><strong>panjandrum</strong> – A pompous self-important official or person of rank</li>
<li><strong>pantechnicon</strong> – 1. A large van, esp. one used for furniture removals; 2. a warehouse where furniture is stored</li>
<li><strong>pap</strong> – 1. A teat or nipple (archaic); 2. material lacking real value or substance; 3. soft or semiliquid food, as for infants</li>
<li><strong>papillote</strong> – 1. A paper frill around cutlets; 2. cooked in oiled greaseproof paper or foil</li>
<li><strong>pappus</strong> – A ring of fine feathery hairs surrounding the fruit in composite plants, such as the thistle; aids dispersal of the fruits by the wind</li>
<li><strong>paraphilia</strong> – Any abnormal sexual behavior; sexual anomaly or deviation</li>
<li><strong>parapraxis</strong> – A Freudian slip</li>
<li><strong>paregoric</strong> – An opium derivative used to treat diarrhea</li>
<li><strong>pareidolia</strong> – The perception of a recognizable image or meaningful pattern where none exists or is intended, as the perception of a face in the surface features of the moon.</li>
<li><strong>paresis</strong> – Slight or partial paralysis</li>
<li><strong>pareve</strong> – Prepared without meat, milk, or their derivatives and therefore permissible to be eaten with meat or dairy dishes according to dietary laws</li>
<li><strong>pari passu</strong> – At an equal pace; side by side</li>
<li><strong>parlous</strong> – full of danger or uncertainty</li>
<li><strong>paromologia</strong> – Admitting a weaker point in order to make a stronger one. (See <em>concessio</em>.)</li>
<li><strong>paronomasia</strong> – Pun; play on words</li>
<li><strong>parrhesia</strong> – Boldness or frankness of speech; the act of asking forgiveness for speaking in such a way</li>
<li><strong>parterre</strong> – A formally patterned flower garden</li>
<li><strong>partizan</strong> – A weapon of the 16th and 17th centuries with long shaft and broad blade</li>
<li><strong>parturition</strong> – The act or process of giving birth to one or more offspring</li>
<li><strong>parve</strong> – Containing neither meat nor milk products and so fit for use with either meat or milk dishes (from Judaism)</li>
<li><strong>passerine</strong> – An order of birds characterized by the perching habit: includes the larks, finches, crows, thrushes, starlings, etc.</li>
<li><strong>pastern</strong> – The part of a horse&rsquo;s foot between the fetlock and hoof</li>
<li><strong>pauce</strong> – Being scarce or insufficient</li>
<li><strong>pauldron</strong> – Shoulder protection in a suit of armor</li>
<li><strong>pavis</strong> – A medieval shield large enough to protect the whole body.</li>
<li><strong>pawl</strong> – A hinged or pivoted device adapted to fit into a notch of a ratchet wheel to impart forward motion or prevent backward motion.</li>
<li><strong>peaky</strong> – Wan, emaciated, or sickly</li>
<li><strong>peavey</strong> – An implement consisting of a wooden shaft with a metal point and a hinged hook near the end, used to handle logs.</li>
<li><strong>peccant</strong> – Sinful; guilty; corrupt</li>
<li><strong>peccary</strong> – A gregarious pig-like mammal that is found from the southwestern U.S. to Paraguay. (reference was “swarm […] like army ants on a drove of peccaries”.)</li>
<li><strong>peculation</strong> – Embezzlement</li>
<li><strong>pecuniary</strong> – Relating to money</li>
<li><strong>pedipalp</strong> – One of the second pair of appendages near the mouth of a chelicerate, such as a spider or horseshoe crab, used for various reproductive, predatory, or sensory functions.</li>
<li><strong>pedlars</strong> – Persons who travel about the country with merchandise, for the purpose of selling it; salesmen</li>
<li><strong>pedology</strong> – 1. The scientific study of soils, including their origins, characteristics, and uses; 2. the study of the physical and mental development and characteristics of children</li>
<li><strong>pelf</strong> – Lucre; wealth or riches, esp. when dishonestly acquired</li>
<li><strong>pellicle</strong> – A thin skin or membrane; film; scum</li>
<li><strong>pellucid</strong> – Transparent or translucent</li>
<li><strong>penectomy</strong> – Penis removal through surgery, generally for medical or personal reasons.</li>
<li><strong>pentimento</strong> – A visible trace of earlier painting beneath a layer or layers of paint on a canvas</li>
<li><strong>penurious</strong> – Poverty-stricken; stingy; meager</li>
<li><strong>peplum</strong> – A short overskirt or ruffle attached at the waistline of a jacket, blouse, or dress.</li>
<li><strong>percale</strong> – A closely woven cotton fabric used for sheets and clothing</li>
<li><strong>percipient</strong> – Perceptive</li>
<li><strong>perdurable</strong> – Enduring continuously; immortal</li>
<li><strong>perdure</strong> – To last permanently; endure</li>
<li><strong>peremptory</strong> – Subject to no further debate or dispute; final and unassailable</li>
<li><strong>perfervid</strong> – Extremely or extravagantly eager; impassioned or zealous.</li>
<li><strong>perfidy</strong> – Treachery; deliberate breach of faith</li>
<li><strong>periagua</strong> – Another name for pirogue; Also <em>piragua</em>; A canoe made from a hollowed tree trunk</li>
<li><strong>peripatetic</strong> – Mobile on foot; an itinerant</li>
<li><strong>periphrastic</strong> – The use of circumlocution. A roundabout way of expressing something.</li>
<li><strong>peristalsis</strong> – The wavelike muscular contractions of the digestive tract or other tubular structures by which contents are forced onward toward the opening</li>
<li><strong>peristyles</strong> – 1. A series of columns surrounding a building or enclosing a court; 2. A court enclosed by columns.</li>
<li><strong>perseverate</strong> – To repeat a word, gesture, or act insistently or redundantly</li>
<li><strong>persiflage</strong> – Banter; small-talk</li>
<li><strong>perspicacious</strong> – Acutely perceptive or discerning</li>
<li><strong>perspicuous</strong> – Clearly expressed or presented; lucid</li>
<li><strong>pertinacious</strong> – Tenacious; Holding tenaciously or stubbornly to a purpose, opinion, or course of action; Extremely persistent or unyielding</li>
<li><strong>pessary</strong> – A device for inserting into the vagina, either as a support for the uterus or (diaphragm pessary) to deliver a drug, such as a contraceptive</li>
<li><strong>petecure</strong> – Modest cooking; cooking on a small scale; the opposite of <em>epicure</em></li>
<li><strong>petitio principii</strong> – A form of fallacious reasoning in which the conclusion has been assumed in the premises; begging the question</li>
<li><strong>petrichor</strong> – The distinctive smell given off by earth, rock, or pavement at the beginning of a rain after a period of warm, dry weather.</li>
<li><strong>Petronius</strong> – Roman courtier who is credited with writing the Satyricon</li>
<li><strong>pettifogging</strong> – 1. Dishonest or unethical in insignificant matters; meanly petty; mean; quibbling; 2. to engage in legal chicanery</li>
<li><strong>pettish</strong> – Ill-tempered; peevish (see <em>shirty</em>)</li>
<li><strong>phaeton</strong> – A light, four-wheeled open carriage, usually drawn by a pair of horses</li>
<li><strong>phalanstery</strong> – A self-sustaining cooperative community of the followers of Fourierism. Also called phalanx, or the buildings in such a community</li>
<li><strong>pharisaic</strong> – Of, relating to, or characteristic of the Pharisees</li>
<li><strong>philippic</strong> – A verbal denunciation characterized by harsh, often insulting language; a tirade</li>
<li><strong>phillumenist</strong> – A person who collects matchbox labels</li>
<li><strong>philogynist</strong> – A lover or friend of women; one who esteems woman as the higher type of humanity; antonym of <em>misogynist</em></li>
<li><strong>phimosis</strong> – An abnormal constriction of the foreskin that prevents it from being drawn back to uncover the glans penis.</li>
<li><strong>phlebotomy</strong> – The act or practice of opening a vein to let or draw blood as a therapeutic or diagnostic measure</li>
<li><strong>phlegmatic</strong> – Having or suggesting a calm, sluggish temperament; unemotional or apathetic</li>
<li><strong>Phoebus</strong> – The sun</li>
<li><strong>phthisis</strong> – A disease characterized by the wasting away or atrophy of the body or a part of the body (e.g. pulmonary tuberculosis)</li>
<li><strong>phylactery</strong> – 1. A reminder or aid to remembering; 2. an amulet or charm (archaic); 3. either of the pair of blackened square cases containing parchments inscribed with biblical passages, bound by leather thongs to the head and left arm, and worn by Jewish men during weekday morning prayers (also called: <em>Tefillah</em>)</li>
<li><strong>phylogenetic</strong> – The evolutionary development and history of a species or trait of a species or of a higher taxonomic grouping of organisms</li>
<li><strong>piacular</strong> – Making expiation for sacrilege; wicked</li>
<li><strong>pibroch</strong> – A series of variations on a martial theme or traditional dirge for the highland bagpipes.</li>
<li><strong>pied-à-terre</strong> – A secondary or temporary place of lodging.</li>
<li><strong>pilchard</strong> – A small, S European marine fish, Sardina pilchardus, related to the herring but smaller and rounder</li>
<li><strong>pillock</strong> – A stupid or annoying person (chiefly British)</li>
<li><strong>pilum</strong> – The heavy javelin of a Roman foot soldier</li>
<li><strong>pinchbeck</strong> – Appearing valuable, but actually cheap and tawdry; an alloy of zinc and copper used as imitation gold.</li>
<li><strong>pinnace</strong> – Any of various kinds of ship&rsquo;s tender or boat</li>
<li><strong>piquant</strong> – Pleasantly sharp taste</li>
<li><strong>pirogue</strong> – Any of various kinds of dugout canoes; also called <em>piragua</em></li>
<li><strong>piscatorial</strong> – Of or relating to fish, fishing, or fishermen</li>
<li><strong>pistic</strong> – Referring to or having a pure and genuine faith.</li>
<li><strong>plafond</strong> – A decorated ceiling.</li>
<li><strong>plangent</strong> – Loud and resounding</li>
<li><strong>plastron</strong> – 1. A metal breastplate worn under a coat of mail; 2. a quilted pad worn by fencers to protect the torso and side; 3. The front of a man&rsquo;s dress shirt; 4. the ventral part of the shell of a turtle or tortoise</li>
<li><strong>pleach</strong> – To plait or interlace (branches or vines, for example), esp. in making a hedge or an arbor (similar to <em>caning</em> for making chairs from same)</li>
<li><strong>pleiotropy</strong> – The phenomenon of one gene affecting more than one phenotypic characteristic</li>
<li><strong>plenteous</strong> – Ample; abundant; copious</li>
<li><strong>pleonasm</strong> – A newly created word</li>
<li><strong>pleroma</strong> – The state of total fullness or abundance, relating particularly to the nature of God</li>
<li><strong>pleura</strong> – A thin serous membrane in mammals that envelops each lung and folds back to make a lining for the chest cavity</li>
<li><strong>pleurisy</strong> – Inflammation of the pleura, characterized by pain that is aggravated by deep breathing or coughing</li>
<li><strong>Plimsoll mark</strong> – A load line painted on the side of a cargo ship</li>
<li><strong>plinth</strong> – A block or slab on which a pedestal, column, or statue is placed</li>
<li><strong>plover</strong> – Any shore bird of the family Charadriidae, typically having a round head, straight bill, and large pointed wings</li>
<li><strong>pneumatophore</strong> – 1. A gas-filled sac serving as a float in some colonial marine hydrozoans, such as the Portuguese man-of-war. 2. A specialized respiratory root in certain aquatic plants, such as the bald cypress, that grows upward and protrudes above the water or mud into the air.</li>
<li><strong>poetaster</strong> – A writer of insignificant, meretricious, or shoddy poetry</li>
<li><strong>poleaxe</strong> – <em>(n):</em> An axe having a hammer face opposite the blade, used to slaughter cattle; <em>v:</em> To strike or fell with or as if with a poleaxe</li>
<li><strong>poleyn</strong> – Knee protection in a suit of armor</li>
<li><strong>polyglossy</strong> – The coexistence of multiple languages in the same geographic area. Also <em>polyglossia</em>.</li>
<li><strong>polygyny</strong> – The condition or practice of having more than one wife at one time</li>
<li><strong>polymath</strong> – A person of great or varied learning</li>
<li><strong>polysemy</strong> – The ability of words, signs and symbols to have multiple meanings.</li>
<li><strong>pomace</strong> – The pulpy material remaining after the juice has been pressed from fruit, such as apples or grapes. Also called <em>marc</em></li>
<li><strong>pomaceous</strong> – Of, relating to, bearing, or characteristic of pomes, especially apples.</li>
<li><strong>poignard</strong> – See <em>poniard</em></li>
<li><strong>poniard</strong> – 1. A small, slender dagger; 2. a dagger typically having a slender three- or four-sided blade</li>
<li><strong>pong</strong> – A disagreeable or offensive smell; stink</li>
<li><strong>pontine</strong> – Of or relating to a pons, especially the pons Varolii (a region of the medulla in the brain).</li>
<li><strong>poplin</strong> – A ribbed fabric of silk, rayon, wool, or cotton, used in making clothing and upholstery</li>
<li><strong>posset</strong> – A drink of hot milk curdled with ale, beer, etc, flavoured with spices, formerly used as a remedy for colds</li>
<li><strong>postern</strong> – Secondary door or gate in a fortification such as a city wall or castle curtain wall</li>
<li><strong>postillion</strong> – A person who guides a horse-drawn coach or post chaise while mounted on the horse or one of a pair of horses. By contrast, a coachman controls the horses from the vehicle itself.</li>
<li><strong>potash</strong> – Potassium carbonate, esp. the crude impure form obtained from wood ashes.</li>
<li><strong>pothouse</strong> – A small tavern or pub (chiefly British)</li>
<li><strong>potsherd</strong> – A broken pottery fragment, esp. one of archaeological value</li>
<li><strong>prang</strong> – 1. An accident or crash in an aircraft, car, etc; 2. to bomb from the air</li>
<li><strong>prattlement</strong> – Chatter, prattling</li>
<li><strong>precatory</strong> – Relating to or expressing entreaty or supplication. Relating to prayer.</li>
<li><strong>preceptor</strong> – A teacher; an instructor; a practising physician giving practical training to a medical student</li>
<li><strong>prefatory</strong> – Of, relating to, or constituting a preface</li>
<li><strong>prelapsarian</strong> – Of or relating to the period before the fall of Adam and Eve</li>
<li><strong>premonitory</strong> – Giving premonition; serving to warn beforehand</li>
<li><strong>preponderant</strong> – Having superior force, importance, or influence; Having greater weight; heavier</li>
<li><strong>prepossession</strong> – A prejudice or bias, esp. a favorable one</li>
<li><strong>presbyopia</strong> – A progressively diminishing ability of the eye to focus, noticeable from middle to old age, caused by loss of elasticity of the crystalline lens</li>
<li><strong>prescind</strong> – To separate in thought; abstract.</li>
<li><strong>preterite</strong> – 1. Bygone; former 2. A tense of verbs used to relate past action, formed in English by inflection of the verb, as jumped, swam</li>
<li><strong>primogeniture</strong> – The state of being the firstborn or eldest child of the same parents.</li>
<li><strong>primus inter pares</strong> – Literally (in Latin), first among equals</li>
<li><strong>procumbent</strong> – 1. Lying face down; prone. 2. In botany: trailing along the ground but not rooting</li>
<li><strong>prodrome</strong> – An early symptom indicating the onset of an attack or a disease.</li>
<li><strong>profligate</strong> – 1. Shamelessly immoral or debauched; 2. wildly extravagant or wasteful</li>
<li><strong>progeria</strong> – A rare genetic disorder of childhood that is characterized by rapid onset of the physical changes typical of old age, usually resulting in death before the age of 20</li>
<li><strong>prolegomenon</strong> – A preliminary discussion, especially a formal essay introducing a work of considerable length or complexity</li>
<li><strong>proleptic</strong> – 1. The anachronistic representation of something as existing before its proper or historical time, as in <em>the precolonial United States</em>; 2. the use of a descriptive word in anticipation of the act or circumstances that would make it applicable, as <em>dry</em> in <em>They drained the lake dry</em></li>
<li><strong>prolix</strong> – Tediously prolonged; wordy; longwinded</li>
<li><strong>prone</strong> – Lying flat or face downwards; prostrate</li>
<li><strong>propaedeutic</strong> – Providing introductory instruction; preparatory instruction</li>
<li><strong>propinquitous</strong> – Near; close in time, place or kinship (page 12 of <em>Main Street</em>)</li>
<li><strong>propitious</strong> – Favorable; auguring well; gracious or favorably inclined</li>
<li><strong>proprioception</strong> – Unconscious awareness of body movement, e.g. as the inner ear for balance (page 515 of <em>Reamde</em>)</li>
<li><strong>proscenium</strong> – The area of a modern theater that is located between the curtain and the orchestra.</li>
<li><strong>prosector</strong> – A person who prepares or dissects anatomical subjects for demonstration</li>
<li><strong>prosopagnosia</strong> – An inability to recognize faces</li>
<li><strong>prosopography</strong> – 1.  description of a person&rsquo;s life and career; 2. A study, often using statistics, that identifies and draws relationships between various characters or people within a specific historical, social, or literary context</li>
<li><strong>prosopopoeia</strong> – Literary device involve an absent person speaking; personification; ascribing agency to an inanimate object or concept</li>
<li><strong>protanopia</strong> – A form of colorblindness characterized by defective perception of red and confusion of red with green or bluish green.</li>
<li><strong>protasis</strong> – The dependent clause of a conditional sentence (i.e. the “if” part)</li>
<li><strong>protodialectical</strong> – Definition unknown (from <em>Oblivion</em> by David Foster Wallace) (<em>dialectical</em> means “the art or practice of arriving at the truth by the exchange of logical arguments”)</li>
<li><strong>psalmody</strong> – The act of singing psalms or hymns</li>
<li><strong>psephology</strong> – The study of political elections and polling </li>
<li><strong>psithurism</strong> – The whispering of leaves moved by the wind</li>
<li><strong>psittacosis</strong> – A rickettsial disease affecting birds of the parrot family, pigeons, and domestic fowl, caused by the chlamydia Chlamydia psittaci and transmissible to humans</li>
<li><strong>psychogenic</strong> – Having origin in the mind or in a mental condition or process</li>
<li><strong>ptosis</strong> – Ptosis is the term used for a drooping upper eyelid</li>
<li><strong>puericratic</strong> – [definition unknown] (from <em>Oblivion</em> by David Foster Wallace)</li>
<li><strong>pugnacious</strong> – Combative in nature</li>
<li><strong>pulchritude</strong> – Beauty</li>
<li><strong>pullulate</strong> – To breed rapidly or abundantly</li>
<li><strong>pulsion</strong> – The act of driving forward</li>
<li><strong>punctilio</strong> – A fine point of etiquette</li>
<li><strong>punnet</strong> – A small basket for fruit, such as strawberries</li>
<li><strong>purblind</strong> – 1. Slow in understanding or discernment; dull 2. Having poor vision; nearly or partly blind</li>
<li><strong>purdah</strong> – Muslim practice of screening women from other men or strangers</li>
<li><strong>purlieus</strong> – An outlying or neighboring area; outskirts; environs</li>
<li><strong>purslane</strong> – A trailing plant (Portulaca oleracea) native to Eurasia, having small yellow flowers, reddish stems, and fleshy obovate leaves that can be cooked as a vegetable or used in salads</li>
<li><strong>purulent</strong> – Containing, discharging, or causing the production of pus</li>
<li><strong>pusillanimous</strong> – Cowardly</li>
<li><strong>putto</strong> – A representation of a small child, often naked and having wings, used especially in the art of the European Renaissance. Pl.: putti</li>
<li><strong>pyaemia</strong> – Blood poisoning characterized by pus-forming microorganisms in the blood</li>
<li><strong>quadrille</strong> – A square dance in 6/8 or 2/4 time of French origin, composed of five sections and performed by four couples.</li>
<li><strong>quag</strong> – To shake (said of something that is soft or flabby)</li>
<li><strong>quarto</strong> – The page size obtained by folding a whole sheet into four leaves.</li>
<li><strong>quasiergot</strong> – A pseudo language/lingo</li>
<li><strong>quern</strong> – A simple hand mill for grinding grain, typically consisting of two stones</li>
<li><strong>quiddity</strong> – 1. Essence of a thing; 2. a quibble</li>
<li><strong>quidnunc</strong> – Busybody; Yenta</li>
<li><strong>quiff</strong> – 1. A tuft of hair, esp. a forelock; 2. A woman regarded as promiscuous</li>
<li><strong>quinquennial</strong> – Happening once every or lasting for five years.</li>
<li><strong>quintain</strong> – A rotating target used in jousting exercises</li>
<li><strong>quire</strong> – A set of twenty-four uniform sheets of paper</li>
<li><strong>quirt</strong> – A riding whip with a short, stiff handle and a lash made of two or more loose thongs</li>
<li><strong>quit-rent</strong> – Payment for distinct rights that were connected with the full enjoyment of the land but not parceled up in the ownership of the land (mostly replaced with property taxes today)</li>
<li><strong>quoin</strong> – An exterior angle of a wall or other piece of masonry</li>
<li><strong>quokka</strong> – A short-tailed herbivorous marsupial (<em>Setonix brachyurus</em>) found in coastal areas of southwestAustralia</li>
<li><strong>quondam</strong> – Former</li>
<li><strong>raceme</strong> – A flower cluster in which each flower grows on its own stalk from a common stem. The lily of the valley and snapdragon have racemes.</li>
<li><strong>racketeering</strong> – A person who engages in an illegal business or other organized illegal activities</li>
<li><strong>raddled</strong> – Twisted together; interwoven</li>
<li><strong>radome</strong> – A domelike shell transparent to radio-frequency radiation, used to house a radar antenna</li>
<li><strong>raillery</strong> – Good-natured teasing or ridicule; banter</li>
<li><strong>raiponce</strong> – French name for a biennial Eurasian plant (Campanula rapunculus) having bell-shaped lilac flowers and an edible root. Known in English as <em>rampion</em>.</li>
<li><strong>ramify</strong> – To have complicating consequences or outgrowths; to send out branches or subordinate branchlike parts.</li>
<li><strong>ramose</strong> – Having many branches</li>
<li><strong>ranseur</strong> – Also called <em>roncone</em>, was a polearm similar to the partisan used in Europe up to the 15th century.</li>
<li><strong>ravel</strong> – 1. To separate the fibers or threads of; to unravel; 2. To tangle or complicate</li>
<li><strong>ravelin</strong> – An outwork having two embankments at a salient angle</li>
<li><strong>rawboned</strong> – Having a lean, gaunt frame with prominent bones</li>
<li><strong>Reaumur</strong> – <em>archaic</em>: a temperature scale with the freezing point of water at 80º.</li>
<li><strong>rebarbative</strong> – Tending to irritate; repellent</li>
<li><strong>rebeck</strong> – Medieval instrument; a lute-like violin</li>
<li><strong>recondite</strong> – Obscure; abstruse</li>
<li><strong>recreant</strong> – 1. A faithless or disloyal person; 2. A coward</li>
<li><strong>recrudescent</strong> – To break out anew or come into renewed activity, as after a period of quiescence</li>
<li><strong>recumbentibus</strong> – A knockdown blow</li>
<li><strong>redolent</strong> – Suggestive</li>
<li><strong>reef</strong> – A vein of ore</li>
<li><strong>reeve</strong> – 1. Any of various minor officers of parishes or other local authorities. 2. A bailiff or steward of a manor in the later medieval period.</li>
<li><strong>relict</strong> – 1. Something that has survived; a remnant 2. A species that inhabits a much smaller geographic area than it did in the past, often because of environmental change</li>
<li><strong>reliquary</strong> – A receptacle, such as a coffer or shrine, for keeping or displaying sacred relics</li>
<li><strong>renascent</strong> – Becoming active or vigorous again</li>
<li><strong>reperfusion</strong> – The restoration of blood flow to an organ or tissue that has had its blood supply cut off, as after a heart attack.</li>
<li><strong>repine</strong> – To be discontented or low in spirits; complain or fret; to yearn after something</li>
<li><strong>retort</strong> – A closed laboratory vessel with an outlet tube, used for distillation, sublimation, or decomposition by heat.</li>
<li><strong>retromingent</strong> – One who urinates backwards</li>
<li><strong>retronym</strong> – A new word coined for an existing or older thing to distinguish it from something newer or more recent (e.g. <em>analog watch</em> or <em>electric guitar</em>)</li>
<li><strong>retropulsion</strong> – An abnormal tendency to walk backwards: a symptom of Parkinson&rsquo;s disease</li>
<li><strong>revanchism</strong> – The act of retaliating, esp. by a nation or group to regain lost territory or standing; revenge</li>
<li><strong>revenant</strong> – 1. One that returns after a lengthy absence; 2. One who returns after death</li>
<li><strong>revetments</strong> – 1. A facing, as of masonry, used to support an embankment; 2. A barricade against explosives</li>
<li><strong>Rhadamanthine</strong> – Strictly and uncompromisingly just</li>
<li><strong>rhonchus</strong> – A snore or chest rattle</li>
<li><strong>rhotacism</strong> – Difficulty pronouncing r sounds</li>
<li><strong>ricasso</strong> – An unsharpened section of a sword or knife blade next to the hilt.</li>
<li><strong>riprap</strong> – Piled broken stones used as a foundation or to stabilize an easily eroded bank or slope</li>
<li><strong>risible</strong> – 1. Eliciting laughter; ludicrous 2. capable of laughing or inclined to laugh</li>
<li><strong>Risorgimento</strong> – The period of or the movement for the liberation and political unification of Italy, beginning about 1750 and lasting until 1870 (from the Italian for “resurgence”)</li>
<li><strong>roman à clef</strong> – A novel in which actual persons, places, or events are depicted in fictional guise</li>
<li><strong>rosser</strong> – A bark-removing machine</li>
<li><strong>rota</strong> – A work schedule</li>
<li><strong>roué</strong> – A man who recklessly indulges in sensual pleasures; a rake</li>
<li><strong>roundel</strong> – A circular architectural or decorative element, such as a painted panel or a stained glass window.</li>
<li><strong>roundelay</strong> – A poem or song with a regularly recurring refrain (as much popular music)</li>
<li><strong>rumbustiousness</strong> – Uncontrollably exuberant; unruly</li>
<li><strong>Ruritanian</strong> – Of or relating to an imagined European kingdom characterized by provincialism, nationalism, and political intrigue; used in discussions of international law or economic theory</li>
<li><strong>rusk</strong> – A light, soft-textured sweetened biscuit</li>
<li><strong>sabine</strong> – A member of an ancient people of central Italy, conquered and assimilated by the Romans in 290 bc.</li>
<li><strong>Sadhu</strong> – A person who dedicates themself to the pursuit of enlightenment through a life of isolation, self-deprivation, and feats of physical endurance.</li>
<li><strong>Saiva</strong> – One who worships Shiva</li>
<li><strong>sacerdotal</strong> – Of or relating to priests or the priesthood; priestly.</li>
<li><strong>sacerdotalism</strong> – The belief that priests act as mediators between God and humans.</li>
<li><strong>Salesian</strong> – Of or relating to St Francis of Sales or to the religious orders founded by him or by St John Bosco in his name</li>
<li><strong>salient</strong> – 1. A military position that projects into the position of the enemy. 2. A projecting angle or part.</li>
<li><strong>salmagundi</strong> – A mixture; a potpourri</li>
<li><strong>saltatrix</strong> – A Bluefish; Bluefish are known as tailor in Australia and New Zealand, elf and shad in South Africa.</li>
<li><strong>saltire</strong> – A cross in heraldry</li>
<li><strong>saltpeter</strong> – Naturally occurring potassium nitrate, used in making fireworks, gunpowder</li>
<li><strong>salubrious</strong> – Wholesome; healthy</li>
<li><strong>salvific</strong> – Having the intention or power to bring about salvation or redemption</li>
<li><strong>salwar</strong> – Loose pajamalike pants, typically having a drawstring waist and legs that narrow at the bottom, usually worn with a kameez</li>
<li><strong>sambar</strong> – A large deer of southern Asia and the East Indies, with a rough shaggy mane and long curved antlers; also <em>sambhur</em>.</li>
<li><strong>samizdat</strong> – Underground newspaper (from the Russian)</li>
<li><strong>samphire</strong> – An edible coastal plant (<em>Crithmum maritimum</em>) in the parsley family, native to Eurasia (see <em>glasswort</em>)</li>
<li><strong>samsara</strong> – The eternal cycle of birth, suffering, death, and rebirth (in Hinduism or Buddhism)</li>
<li><strong>sanguine</strong> – Cheerfully optimistic</li>
<li><strong>sanicle</strong> – Any plant belonging to the genus Sanicula, of the parsley family, as S. marilandica, of North America, used in medicine.</li>
<li><strong>sapper</strong> – 1. A military engineer who lays, detects, and disarms mines; 2. a soldier who digs trenches</li>
<li><strong>Sapphism</strong> – Lesbianism</li>
<li><strong>Sassanian</strong> – Of or relating to a Persian dynasty (AD 224-651) and the last line of Persian kings before the Arab conquest.</li>
<li><strong>sastrugi</strong> – A long wavelike ridge of snow, formed by the wind and found on the polar plains</li>
<li><strong>satori</strong> – A spiritual awakening sought in Zen Buddhism, often coming suddenly</li>
<li><strong>satrap</strong> – Governor of a province in ancient Persia</li>
<li><strong>satrapy</strong> – The territory or sphere under the rule of a satrap</li>
<li><strong>satsuma</strong> – A seedless mandarin orange originally cultivated in Japan.</li>
<li><strong>saturnine</strong> – Slow and gloomy; morose</li>
<li><strong>sawyer</strong> – A bobbing tree in a body of water</li>
<li><strong>scansion</strong> – Analysis of verse into metrical patterns.</li>
<li><strong>scapular</strong> – A monk&rsquo;s sleeveless outer garment that hangs from the shoulders and sometimes has a cowl</li>
<li><strong>schtum</strong> – Silent (from the German <em>stumm</em>)</li>
<li><strong>sciatheric</strong> – Belonging to a sundial</li>
<li><strong>scienter</strong> – Knowledge that one&rsquo;s actions are wrong or contrary to law, where such knowledge is an element of a criminal offense or a basis for liability.</li>
<li><strong>sciolist</strong> – A pretentious attitude of scholarship; superficial knowledgeability</li>
<li><strong>scordatura</strong> – The technique of altering the normal tuning of a stringed instrument to produce particular effects.</li>
<li><strong>scoria</strong> – Porous cinderlike fragments of dark lava. Also called cinders, slag</li>
<li><strong>scoriatic</strong> – Cinder- or slag-like; rocky, craggy</li>
<li><strong>scotophliic</strong> – Functioning best in darkness</li>
<li><strong>scourge</strong> – A whip or lash</li>
<li><strong>scramasax</strong> – A single-edged knife or sword used by the Anglo-Saxons</li>
<li><strong>scringe</strong> – To shrug the back or shoulders from cold</li>
<li><strong>scripturient</strong> – Having a strong urge to write</li>
<li><strong>scrouge</strong> – To inconvenience or discomfort a person by pressing against him or her or by standing too close</li>
<li><strong>scutelliphile</strong> – The hobby of collecting patches or badges</li>
<li><strong>searce</strong> – To sift (obsolete)</li>
<li><strong>sebum</strong> – The semifluid secretion of the sebaceous glands, consisting chiefly of fat, keratin, and cellular material</li>
<li><strong>secateurs</strong> – Pruning shears; a small pair of shears for pruning, having a pair of pivoted handles, sprung so that they are normally open, and usually a single cutting blade that closes against a flat surface</li>
<li><strong>secondment</strong> – Temporary transfer to another position or employment</li>
<li><strong>sedulously</strong> – Assiduous; constant in effort; persevering (from <em>A very short history of driving while black</em>)</li>
<li><strong>seigneur</strong> – A man of rank, esp. a feudal lord in the ancien régime</li>
<li><strong>seigniorage</strong> – Revenue or a profit taken from the minting of coins</li>
<li><strong>seine</strong> – A fishing net or the act of using one (page 653 of <em>Reamde</em>)</li>
<li><strong>semasiology</strong> – Semantics; the study of semantic change</li>
<li><strong>semiotics</strong> – The study of systems of communication</li>
<li><strong>sempiternal</strong> – Infinite; enduring forever</li>
<li><strong>sempstress</strong> – A rare word for seamstress</li>
<li><strong>seneschal</strong> – A steward or major-domo (in charge of servants)</li>
<li><strong>sententious</strong> – Given to moralizing in a pompous or affected manner</li>
<li><strong>septentrional</strong> – Of the north; Germanic; used mostly on maps</li>
<li><strong>sepulchritude</strong> – Tomb-like; also, sepulchral</li>
<li><strong>sequacious</strong> – Unthinking and uncritical; slavish</li>
<li><strong>sequela</strong> – A secondary consequence or result; condition resulting from a disease</li>
<li><strong>seraglio</strong> – A large harem.</li>
<li><strong>serotype</strong> – A group of closely related microorganisms distinguished by a characteristic set of antigens</li>
<li><strong>sesquipedalian</strong> – Given to using long words</li>
<li><strong>shako</strong> – A stiff, cylindrical military dress hat with a metal plate or badge in front, a short visor, and a plume or pompom</li>
<li><strong>shambles</strong> – A slaughterhouse.</li>
<li><strong>sheela na gig</strong> – Figurative carvings of naked women displaying an exaggerated vulva.</li>
<li><strong>shibboleth</strong> – 1. An inappropriate or outdated custom; 2. A word or pronunciation that distinguishes people of one group or class from those of another</li>
<li><strong>shiplap</strong> – Wooden siding rabbeted so that the edge of one board overlaps the one next to it in a flush joint.</li>
<li><strong>shirty</strong> – Ill-tempered; angry</li>
<li><strong>shockheaded</strong> – Having a head of bushy or tousled hair</li>
<li><strong>shotcrete</strong> – Concrete conveyed through a hose and pneumatically projected at high velocity onto a surface.</li>
<li><strong>Shrovetide</strong> – The three days, Shrove Sunday, Shrove Monday, and Shrove Tuesday, preceding Ash Wednesday.</li>
<li><strong>shufti</strong> – A quick look around</li>
<li><strong>sibilent</strong> – Hissing sound</li>
<li><strong>siderite</strong> – A meteorite consisting mainly of iron and nickel.</li>
<li><strong>sine qua non</strong> – An essential element or condition</li>
<li><strong>singultus</strong> – A hiccup</li>
<li><strong>sinistre</strong> – Left-hand; sinister (fr.)</li>
<li><strong>skittles</strong> – Nine-pin bowling</li>
<li><strong>slapper</strong> – A promiscuous woman</li>
<li><strong>slub</strong> – A soft thick nub in yarn that is either an imperfection or purposely set for a desired effect.</li>
<li><strong>slunk</strong> – A prematurely born calf or other animal</li>
<li><strong>snarge</strong> – A collision of an aircraft with a bird (or the remnants thereof)</li>
<li><strong>soca</strong> – A style of music, originating in the West Indies, that is a blend of soul and calypso</li>
<li><strong>sociolects</strong> – A language variety that is associated with a specific social group (e.g. a profession-specific argot)</li>
<li><strong>sockdolager</strong> – Something outstanding; a final blow or remark, coup de grace</li>
<li><strong>sodality</strong> – Fellowship; fraternity; association; society</li>
<li><strong>solon</strong> – A wise lawgiver; a legislator</li>
<li><strong>sonic</strong> – Relating to or containing sodium</li>
<li><strong>soi-disant</strong> – Self-styled; so-called</li>
<li><strong>solastalgia</strong> – A form of emotional or existential distress caused by environmental change</li>
<li><strong>solecism</strong> – A grammatical error; more generously, a non-standard usage</li>
<li><strong>solon</strong> – A legislator</li>
<li><strong>somatically</strong> – Corporeal or physical; of, relating to, or affecting the body, esp. as distinguished from a body part, the mind, or the environment</li>
<li><strong>somaticize</strong> – To convert (anxiety) into physical symptoms.</li>
<li><strong>sommian</strong> – A volcanic caldera that has been partially filled by a new central cone </li>
<li><strong>sortilege</strong> – The act or practice of foretelling the future by drawing lots.</li>
<li><strong>soteriological</strong> – The branch of theology dealing with the nature and means of salvation.</li>
<li><strong>soviet</strong> – One of the popularly elected legislative assemblies that were created after the Russian Revolution (1917) and existed at local, regional, and national levels in the former Soviet Union.</li>
<li><strong>sozzled</strong> – Intoxicated; drunk; see <em>temulent</em> and <em>squiffy</em></li>
<li><strong>spadix</strong> – A fleshy clublike spike bearing minute flowers, usually enclosed within a sheathlike spathe, characteristic of aroid plants such as the jack-in-the-pulpit</li>
<li><strong>spall</strong> – A chip, fragment, or flake from a piece of stone or ore</li>
<li><strong>spanandry</strong> – Scarcity of males in a population.</li>
<li><strong>spandrel</strong> – The roughly triangular space between the left or right exterior curve of an arch and the rectangular framework surrounding it.</li>
<li><strong>sparge</strong> – 1. To spray or sprinkle; 2. To run additional water through (a partly or completely drained mash) to extract more fermentable sugars; 3. To introduce air or gas into (a liquid)</li>
<li><strong>spatchcock</strong> – To prepare for roasting or grilling by splitting open</li>
<li><strong>spathe</strong> – A leaflike bract that encloses or subtends a flower cluster or spadix, as in the jack-in-the-pulpit</li>
<li><strong>spatterdashes</strong> – Long leather leggings worn in the 18th century, as to protect from mud when riding</li>
<li><strong>spavined</strong> – Decrepit or worn out</li>
<li><strong>speculum</strong> – 1. A mirror or polished metal plate used as a reflector in optical instruments; 2. An instrument for dilating the opening of a body cavity for medical examination; 3. A bright, often iridescent patch of color on the wings of certain birds, esp. ducks 4. A transparent spot in the wings of some butterflies or moths.</li>
<li><strong>sphingid</strong> – A hawk moth.</li>
<li><strong>spinel</strong> – A hard, glassy mineral composed of magnesium-aluminum oxide found in metamorphosed limestones and many basic and ultrabasic igneous rocks</li>
<li><strong>spinet</strong> – A small, compact upright piano</li>
<li><strong>spitchcock</strong> – An eel split and grilled or fried; see <em>spatchcock</em></li>
<li><strong>sporran</strong> – A leather or fur pouch worn at the front of the kilt in the traditional dress of men of the Scottish Highlands</li>
<li><strong>sprezzatura</strong> – Studied nonchalance; graceful conduct or performance without apparent effort</li>
<li><strong>sprue</strong> – 1. The hole through which molten material is channeled into a mold; 2. The usually plastic rod or framework that secures molded objects, such as model parts</li>
<li><strong>squamous</strong> – Covered with or formed of scales; scaly</li>
<li><strong>squiffy</strong> – Intoxicated; drunk; see <em>temulent</em> and <em>sozzled</em></li>
<li><strong>squireen</strong> – A pretty squire</li>
<li><strong>staggers</strong> – Any of various diseases in animals, esp. horses, cattle, or other domestic animals, that are characterized by a lack of coordination in moving</li>
<li><strong>stalagnates</strong> – Stalagnates look “stagnant” or completely formed (even though they are still growing).</li>
<li><strong>starosta</strong> – The headman of a Russian village, the chief administrator of a Polish county, or regional Polish nobleman who had official or royal duties</li>
<li><strong>steatopygia</strong> – An extreme accumulation of fat on the buttocks.</li>
<li><strong>stele</strong> – An upright stone or slab with an inscribed or sculptured surface, used as a monument or as a commemorative tablet in the face of a building.</li>
<li><strong>stenosis</strong> – A constriction or narrowing of a duct or passage; a stricture.</li>
<li><strong>sterlet</strong> – A small sturgeon (Acipenser ruthenus) native to rivers flowing into the Black and Caspian Seas, having roe that is used for caviar.</li>
<li><strong>stochastic</strong> – Of, relating to, or characterized by conjecture; Involving or containing a random variable or process</li>
<li><strong>stolon</strong> – A long thin stem that usually grows horizontally along the ground and produces roots and shoots at widely spaced nodes, as in a strawberry plant. Also called <em>runner</em>.</li>
<li><strong>stook</strong> – A group of sheaves of grain stood on end in a field</li>
<li><strong>stot</strong> – To jump straight up with straight legs (e.g. antelope)</li>
<li><strong>stoush</strong> – A fight or brawl</li>
<li><strong>strabismus</strong> – The condition of being cross-eyed</li>
<li><strong>strath</strong> – A strath is a large valley, typically a river valley that is wide and shallow</li>
<li><strong>Strega</strong> – The Italian word for witch</li>
<li><strong>stridulate</strong> – To produce a shrill grating, chirping, or hissing sound by rubbing body parts together, as certain insects do</li>
<li><strong>stroppy</strong> – Bad-tempered and argumentative</li>
<li><strong>stylobate</strong> – The immediate foundation of a row of classical columns</li>
<li><strong>suasion</strong> – Persuasion</li>
<li><strong>subaltern</strong> – A person of inferior rank or position</li>
<li><strong>subfusc</strong> – 1. Of a dark, dull, or somber color; 2. Dark, dull clothing.</li>
<li><strong>subtiliation</strong> – 1. The act of making something thin, rare, or subtile; 2. To think subtly</li>
<li><strong>succussation</strong> – Trotting, shaking</li>
<li><strong>Suetonius</strong> – Roman historian whose major work, Lives of the Caesars, is an account of the lives of the first 12 Roman emperors</li>
<li><strong>sui generis</strong> – Unique</li>
<li><strong>Sukkot</strong> – A harvest festival commemorating the booths in which the Israelites resided during their 40 years in the wilderness</li>
<li><strong>sump</strong> – A depression at the bottom of a shaft where water collects before it is pumped away</li>
<li><strong>sumptuary</strong> – Laws or limits on private expenses</li>
<li><strong>superannuated</strong> – Retired or ineffective because of advanced age</li>
<li><strong>supererogation</strong> – Doing more than required</li>
<li><strong>supernacular</strong> – First-rate</li>
<li><strong>supernumerary</strong> – 1. One that is in excess of the regular, necessary, or usual number; 2. An actor without a speaking part, as one who appears in a crowd scene.</li>
<li><strong>supersedure</strong> – Replacement of an old or diseased queen bee with a new one.</li>
<li><strong>supine</strong> – Lying on the back or having the face upward</li>
<li><strong>surfactant</strong> – A substance, such as detergent, that is added to a liquid to increase its ability to spread.</li>
<li><strong>suzerain</strong> – A nation that controls another nation in international affairs but allows it domestic sovereignty.</li>
<li><strong>sweetmeat</strong> – A sweet delicacy, such as a piece of candy or crystallized fruit</li>
<li><strong>swingeing</strong> – Extreme in effect; drastic</li>
<li><strong>swot</strong> – To cram; derogatory term for a person who crams</li>
<li><strong>syce</strong> – A stableman or groom, esp. in India</li>
<li><strong>syenite</strong> – An igneous rock composed primarily of alkali feldspar together with other minerals, such as hornblende</li>
<li><strong>syllepsis</strong> – See <em>zeugma</em></li>
<li><strong>sylph</strong> – A slim, graceful woman or girl.</li>
<li><strong>sympatetic </strong> – A walking companion</li>
<li><strong>syncope</strong> – 1. The shortening of a word by omission of a sound, letter, or syllable from the middle of the word; for example, bos&rsquo;n for boatswain.2. A brief loss of consciousness caused by inadequate blood flow to the brain.</li>
<li><strong>syncretic</strong> – 1. Reconciliation or fusion of differing systems of belief, as in philosophy or religion, esp. when success is partial or the result is heterogeneous; 2. The merging of two or more originally different inflectional forms in linguistics.</li>
<li><strong>synecdoche</strong> – A trope whereby a part is used as a label for the whole (e.g. &ldquo;hand&rdquo; for &ldquo;sailor&rdquo;); see <em>metonymy</em></li>
<li><strong>synodic</strong> – Relating to the period of time required for an object to complete a single orbital period.</li>
<li><strong>tabard</strong> – A tunic or capelike garment worn by a knight over his armor and emblazoned with his coat of arms</li>
<li><strong>tabes</strong> – A wasting of a bodily organ or part</li>
<li><strong>tabun</strong> – A poisonous liquid that is soluble in organic solvents, C5H11N2O2P, used as a nerve agent in chemical warfare.</li>
<li><strong>tacenda</strong> – Things not to be mentioned; matters that are passed over in silence</li>
<li><strong>tallboy</strong> – A high chest of drawers made in two sections and placed one on top of the other; chest-on-chest</li>
<li><strong>talmudic</strong> – Related to the collection of ancient Rabbinic writings constituting the basis of religious authority in Orthodox Judaism</li>
<li><strong>tamarisk</strong> – Any shrub or small tree having small scalelike or needle-shaped leaves and feathery racemes of small white or pinkish flowers</li>
<li><strong>tangible</strong> – Discernible by the touch; palpable</li>
<li><strong>taphonomic</strong> – The study of the events and processes, such as burial in sediment, transportation, and decomposition, that affect the remains of an organism after it dies.</li>
<li><strong>taphonomy</strong> – The branch of paleontology that deals with the processes of fossilization.</li>
<li><strong>tapotement</strong> – Rapid massage</li>
<li><strong>tarpon</strong> – Either of two large marine game fishes having a bluish-green back and silvery sides (Megalops cyprinoides of the Pacific and Indian Oceans or M. atlanticus of Atlantic coastal waters)</li>
<li><strong>Tartaros</strong> – The abysmal regions below Hades where the Titans were confined.</li>
<li><strong>Tefillin</strong> – See <em>phylactery</em>.</li>
<li><strong>tegument</strong> – A natural outer covering; an integument</li>
<li><strong>Telemachus</strong> – The son of Odysseus and Penelope, who helped his father kill Penelope&rsquo;s suitors</li>
<li><strong>teleology</strong> – The philosophical interpretation of natural phenomena as exhibiting purpose or design</li>
<li><strong>telluric</strong> – Of or relating to Earth; terrestrial</li>
<li><strong>telluride</strong> – A chemical compound of tellurium and another element.</li>
<li><strong>telos</strong> – End of a goal-oriented process</li>
<li><strong>temerarious</strong> – In an audacious manner</li>
<li><strong>tempera</strong> – A painting medium in which pigment is mixed with water-soluble glutinous materials such as size or egg yolk</li>
<li><strong>temulent</strong> – Intoxicated; drunk; see <em>sozzled</em> and <em>squiffy</em></li>
<li><strong>tendentious</strong> – Partisan; marked by or favoring a particular point of view</li>
<li><strong>tenebrous</strong> – Dark and gloomy</li>
<li><strong>tensegrity</strong> – An architectural technique that involves tensional integrity or floating compression (see <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tensegrity">Wikipedia</a>)</li>
<li><strong>tenue</strong> – A way of carrying oneself</li>
<li><strong>tephra</strong> – Solid matter that is ejected into the air by an erupting volcano</li>
<li><strong>tergiversate</strong> – To use evasions or ambiguities; to evade, to equivocate using subterfuge; to deliberately obfuscate.</li>
<li><strong>termagant</strong> – A scold; a shrew</li>
<li><strong>tertium quid</strong> –  Something that cannot be classified into either of two groups considered exhaustive; an intermediate thing or factor.</li>
<li><strong>thaumaturgic</strong> – The working of miracles or magic feats</li>
<li><strong>theodicy</strong> – A vindication of God&rsquo;s goodness and justice in the face of the existence of evil</li>
<li><strong>theodolite</strong> – A surveying instrument</li>
<li><strong>theophany</strong> – An appearance of a god to a human; a divine manifestation</li>
<li><strong>theriac</strong> – An ointment or potion of varying composition, used as an antidote to a poison</li>
<li><strong>thermobaric</strong> – Detonated by means of an explosive substance reacting spontaneously with air</li>
<li><strong>thill</strong> – Either of the two long shafts between which an animal is fastened when pulling a wagon or cart.</li>
<li><strong>throstle</strong> – 1. Any of various thrushes, esp. a song thrush; 2. A machine formerly used for spinning fibers such as cotton or wool</li>
<li><strong>thurible</strong> – A censer used in certain ecclesiastical ceremonies or liturgies</li>
<li><strong>thylacine</strong> – Tasmanian tiger; an extinct or very rare doglike carnivorous marsupial</li>
<li><strong>thymos</strong> – The Ancient Greek concept of &lsquo;spiritedness&rsquo; (as in &ldquo;a spirited stallion&rdquo; or &ldquo;spirited debate&rdquo;).[1] The word indicates a physical association with breath or blood and is also used to express the human desire for recognition.</li>
<li><strong>tierce</strong> – The third of the seven canonical hours; 1/3 of a pipe or 42 gallons; three cards of the same suit; third position in fencing; an interval of a third</li>
<li><strong>tillandsia</strong> – Any of various usually epiphytic bromeliad plants of the genus Tillandsia, such as Spanish moss, of tropical and subtropical America.</li>
<li><strong>tilth</strong> – 1. Tilled earth; 2. The fitness of soil for cultivation, as measured by its structure and composition.</li>
<li><strong>tippet</strong> – A scarf-like narrow piece of clothing, worn over the shoulders</li>
<li><strong>tipstaff</strong> – 1. A staff tipped with metal, formerly carried as a badge of office, as by a constable; 2. any official who carried such a staff</li>
<li><strong>titivate</strong> – To decorate or spruce up</li>
<li><strong>tittle</strong> – 1. A small diacritic mark, such as an accent, vowel mark, or dot over an i. 2. The tiniest bit; an iota</li>
<li><strong>tocsin</strong> – An alarm sounded on a bell</li>
<li><strong>tontine</strong> – A common fund with increasing annuity for each member&rsquo;s death and the last living member gets everything</li>
<li><strong>toothsome</strong> – Delicious, luscious, pleasant, attractive, sexually attractive or exciting</li>
<li><strong>topolect</strong> – The language or speech of a particular place (e.g. Züridütsch)</li>
<li><strong>toponym</strong> – A place name; a name derived from a place or region</li>
<li><strong>toponymy</strong> – The place names of a region or language; the study of such place names; also <em>toponomy</em></li>
<li><strong>torpid</strong> – Mentally or physically inactive; lethargic</li>
<li><strong>torrid</strong> – 1. Parched with the heat of the sun; intensely hot; 2. Passionate; ardent</li>
<li><strong>tosh</strong> – Rubbish; nonsense</li>
<li><strong>tournure</strong> – Implement to expand a dress; a bustle</li>
<li><strong>towhee</strong> – A strikingly marked, oversized sparrow of the East, feathered in bold black and warm reddish-browns</li>
<li><strong>toxophily</strong> – Archery; <em>toxophilite</em>: A student or lover of archery</li>
<li><strong>tracklement</strong> – Savory jelly served with meat</li>
<li><strong>traduce</strong> – To expose to shame or blame by means of falsehood and misrepresentation</li>
<li><strong>traduction</strong> – A transmission or communication; a translation into a different language</li>
<li><strong>transducer</strong> – Any device, such as a microphone or electric motor, that converts one form of energy into another</li>
<li><strong>tref</strong> – Unfit to be eaten; not <em>kosher</em> (corresponds to <em>haram</em> or not <em>halal</em> in Islam)</li>
<li><strong>trenchant</strong> – Clear-cut; forceful or convincing</li>
<li><strong>trepidation</strong> – A state of alarm or dread; apprehension</li>
<li><strong>tressure</strong> – A narrow inner border on a shield, usually decorated with fleurs-de-lys</li>
<li><strong>trews</strong> – Trousers; chiefly British</li>
<li><strong>tricontagon</strong> – A closed plane figure bounded by three or more line segments.</li>
<li><strong>tripe</strong> – Something of no value; rubbish</li>
<li><strong>trope</strong> – Metaphor or non-literal figure of speech</li>
<li><strong>trow</strong> – To think or suppose</li>
<li><strong>truckle</strong> – 1. A small wheel/caster; 2. to be servile</li>
<li><strong>truckling</strong> – To be servile or submissive</li>
<li><strong>trug</strong> – A shallow, usually oval gardening basket made with wide strips of wood</li>
<li><strong>trull</strong> – A woman prostitute.</li>
<li><strong>trypophobia</strong> – An intense, irrational fear of objects with small holes</li>
<li><strong>tsuris</strong> – Problems or difficulties (Yiddish)</li>
<li><strong>tumid</strong> – 1. Swollen; distended. Used of a body part or organ; 2. Of a bulging shape; protuberant; 3. Overblown; bombastic</li>
<li><strong>tumulus</strong> – An ancient grave mound; a barrow (pl. tumuli)</li>
<li><strong>turnkey</strong> – Supplied, installed, or purchased in a condition ready for immediate use, occupation, or operation</li>
<li><strong>tutoyer</strong> – To speak to (someone) on familiar terms</li>
<li><strong>tympany</strong> – Excessive pride or arrogance; inflated manner or style; bombast.</li>
<li><strong>tzitzit</strong> – Specially knotted ritual fringes, or tassels worn by Jewish men around their waist</li>
<li><strong>ukase</strong> – An authoritative order or decree; an edict</li>
<li><strong>ultracrepidarianism</strong> – The habit of giving opinions and advice on matters outside of one’s knowledge or competence.</li>
<li><strong>unasinous</strong> – Sharing the same amount of stupidity; displaying ignorance or foolishness by all.</li>
<li><strong>unction</strong> – Something that serves to soothe; a balm</li>
<li><strong>unctuous</strong> – Excessively ingratiating or insincerely earnest; oily</li>
<li><strong>undecillion</strong> – The cardinal number equal to 10<sup>36</sup>; British: 10<sup>66</sup></li>
<li><strong>undisonant</strong> – Making the sound of waves</li>
<li><strong>unprepossessing</strong> – Creating an unfavorable or neutral first impression</li>
<li><strong>usquebaugh</strong> – Whiskey</li>
<li><strong>usufruct</strong> – Right to use the property of others</li>
<li><strong>uxorious</strong> – Love of or submission to one&rsquo;s wife</li>
<li><strong>vade mecum</strong> – 1. A useful thing that one constantly carries about; 2. A book, such as a guidebook, for ready reference.</li>
<li><strong>vair</strong> – Red-squirrel fur; often used a trimming</li>
<li><strong>valetudinarian</strong> – 1. Chronically ailing; sickly; 2. Constantly and morbidly concerned with one&rsquo;s health</li>
<li><strong>vambrace</strong> – Forearm armor</li>
<li><strong>vastation</strong> – Quick destruction; from the Italian <em>vastare</em>.</li>
<li><strong>vatic</strong> – Of or characteristic of a prophet; oracular (see <em>veridical</em>)</li>
<li><strong>vecturist</strong> – A collector of tokens used in buses and subways</li>
<li><strong>veisalgia</strong> – A hangover (from the Norwegian for “suffering after debauchery”)</li>
<li><strong>vellum</strong> – A fine parchment made from calfskin, lambskin, or kidskin and used for the pages and binding of books</li>
<li><strong>venal</strong> – Open to bribery; mercenary</li>
<li><strong>venery</strong> – The indulgence in or pursuit of sexual activity</li>
<li><strong>venire</strong> – The panel of prospective jurors from which a jury is selected</li>
<li><strong>ventre à terre</strong> – belly to the ground; at full speed; flat out</li>
<li><strong>venule</strong> – A small vein, especially one joining capillaries to larger veins.</li>
<li><strong>verdigris</strong> – A green patina or crust of copper sulfate or copper chloride formed on copper, brass, and bronze exposed to air or seawater for long periods of time</li>
<li><strong>veridical</strong> – 1. Truthful; veracious; 2. Coinciding with future events or apparently unknowable present realities (see <em>vatic</em>)</li>
<li><strong>verisimilitude</strong> – Believable; appearing to be true</li>
<li><strong>vermian</strong> – Resembling or of the nature of a worm; of or relating to worms.</li>
<li><strong>vermilion</strong> – Brilliant or vivid red (also written <em>vermillion</em>)</li>
<li><strong>vernacular</strong> – 1. The everyday language spoken by a people as distinguished from the literary language 2. Built in the local style of ordinary houses, rather than a grand architectural style</li>
<li><strong>vernix</strong> – The waxy white substance found coating the skin of newborn human babies</li>
<li><strong>versipellous</strong> – Changeable, protean</li>
<li><strong>vesicle</strong> – A sac or cyst, esp. one containing fluid</li>
<li><strong>vespertine</strong> – Of, relating to, or occurring in the evening (e.g. active or blooming in the evening)</li>
<li><strong>vetch</strong> – Any of several climbing plants of the legume family, bearing pea-like flowers</li>
<li><strong>vicambulist</strong> – One who walks about in the streets</li>
<li><strong>vicissitude</strong> – Alternation between opposite or contrasting things</li>
<li><strong>vigorish</strong> – 1. A fee charged for the placement of bets by an illegal gambling broker or establishment; 2. Frequent and excessive interest payments charged by an illegal moneylender</li>
<li><strong>villein</strong> – One of a class of feudal serfs who held the legal status of freemen in their dealings with all people except their lord</li>
<li><strong>vinous</strong> – 1. Of, relating to, or made with wine; 2. Having the color of wine</li>
<li><strong>violaceous</strong> – Of a violet color; reddish blue</li>
<li><strong>virago</strong> – 1. A woman regarded as noisy, scolding, or domineering; 2. A large, strong, courageous woman</li>
<li><strong>vitiate</strong> – Spoil or impair the quality or efficiency of</li>
<li><strong>voivode</strong> – A Slavic military commander or a governor of a town or province in parts of SE Europe</li>
<li><strong>volvulus</strong> – Abnormal twisting of the intestine causing obstruction</li>
<li><strong>wale</strong> – One of the heavy planks or strakes extending along the sides of a wooden ship</li>
<li><strong>weeper</strong> – A hole or pipe in a wall to allow water to run off</li>
<li><strong>whelm</strong> – To cover with water; submerge</li>
<li><strong>whin</strong> – Any spiny European evergreen shrub having rudimentary leaves and yellow flowers (also called <em>gorse</em> or <em>furze</em>)</li>
<li><strong>whipping boy</strong> – Scapegoat; a boy formerly raised with a prince or other young nobleman and whipped for the latter&rsquo;s misdeeds</li>
<li><strong>white goods</strong> – Large appliances, like refrigerators and washing machines; compare to <em>brown goods</em>, which are TVs, radios, etc.</li>
<li><strong>widdershins</strong> – In a contrary or counterclockwise direction</li>
<li><strong>windlestraw</strong> – A thin, dried stalk of grass.</li>
<li><strong>withe</strong> – Also <em>withy</em>; a tough, supple twig, used to bind</li>
<li><strong>woad</strong> – An annual Eurasian plant (Isatis tinctoria) in the mustard family, formerly cultivated for its leaves that yield a blue dye.</li>
<li><strong>xenium</strong> – A gift given to a guest</li>
<li><strong>yegg</strong> – A thief, especially a burglar or safecracker</li>
<li><strong>yonic</strong> – Related the vagina, esp. religious rel. to Shakti</li>
<li><strong>zazen</strong> – The primary form of meditation in Zen Buddhism, practiced while sitting cross-legged</li>
<li><strong>zeugma</strong> – When a word applies to two others in jarringly different ways (e.g. <em>John and his license expired yesterday.</em>)</li>
<li><strong>zoetrope</strong> – A mechanical device consisting of a rotating drum ringed with narrow apertures through which an animated image is viewed</li></ol></div>      </div>
      </div>
        <div class="footer">
    <div class="footer-data"><div class="footer-links"><ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/contact.php" title="">Contact</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/support.php" title="">Support</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/privacy.php" title="">Privacy</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/rights.php" title="">Rights</a></li></ul></div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="copyright">Copyright (c) 1999-2026 earthli.com. All Rights Reserved.</div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="versions">Powered by <ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore/app_news.php">earthli News 3.7</a></li><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore" title="">earthli WebCore&trade; 3.7</a></li></ul></div></div>    </div>
      </div>
  </div>  </body>
</html>
]]>
  </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
      <title type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[Books read in 2018]]>
  </title>
    <id>https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3497</id>
    <link href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3497"/>
    <updated>2018-12-27T22:13:36+01:00</updated>
    <author>
        <name type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[Marco von Ballmoos]]>
  </name>
      <uri>https://earthli.com/users/marco</uri>
    </author>
      <summary type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<ol>
<li><a href="#American">American Gods (2002)</a></li>
<li><a href="#Stone">The Stone Sky (2017)</a></li>
<li><a href="#God">The God of Small Things (1997)</a></li>
<li><a href="#Ministry">The Ministry of Utmost Happiness (2017)</a></li>
<li><a href="#Alone">Alone on the Wall (2016)</a></li>
<li><a href="#Ten">Ten Days that Shook the World (1919)</a></li>
<li><a href="#Forever">The Forever War (1974)</a></li>
<li><a href="#Absrudity">The United States of Absurdity (2017)</a></li>
<li><a href="#Adults">Adults in the Room: My Battle with the European and American... [<a class="complete-text-link" href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3497">More</a>]</a></li></ol>]]>
  </summary>
      <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<html lang="en">
  <head>
    <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/themes/ice.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/fonts/raleway.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/core/medium.css">
  </head>
  <body>
<div class="style-controls">  <div class="page">
    <div class="page-body">
<div class="info-box-top">
<p>
Published by <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_user.php?name=marco" title="Marco von Ballmoos" class="visible">marco</a> on <span class="date-time">27. Dec 2018 22:13:36 (GMT-5)</span>
</p>
<p>
Updated by <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_user.php?name=marco" title="Marco von Ballmoos" class="visible">marco</a> on <span class="date-time">10. Feb 2026 21:31:05 (GMT-5)</span>
</p>
</div>
      <div class="text-flow wide">
  <ol>
<li><a href="#American">American Gods (2002)</a></li>
<li><a href="#Stone">The Stone Sky (2017)</a></li>
<li><a href="#God">The God of Small Things (1997)</a></li>
<li><a href="#Ministry">The Ministry of Utmost Happiness (2017)</a></li>
<li><a href="#Alone">Alone on the Wall (2016)</a></li>
<li><a href="#Ten">Ten Days that Shook the World (1919)</a></li>
<li><a href="#Forever">The Forever War (1974)</a></li>
<li><a href="#Absrudity">The United States of Absurdity (2017)</a></li>
<li><a href="#Adults">Adults in the Room: My Battle with the European and American Deep Establishment (2017)</a></li>
<li><a href="#Industrial">Industrial Society and its Future (1995)</a></li>
<li><a href="#Omelas">The Ones Who Walk Away from Omelas (1973)</a></li>
<li><a href="#Rogues">Rogues (2014)</a></li>
<li><a href="#Lathe">The Lathe of Heaven (1971)</a></li>
<li><a href="#Beach">On the Beach (1957)</a></li>
<li><a href="#Dispatches">Dispatches (1977)</a></li>
<li><a href="#Savage">Savage Season: A Hap and Leonard Novel (1990)</a></li>
<li><a href="#Grand">Grand Forks: A History of American Dining in 128 Reviews (2013)</a></li>
<li><a href="#Laurie"><a href="https://stephenking.com/other/stephenking-laurie.pdf">Laurie</a> (2018)</a></li>
<li><a href="#Night">The Night Watch (1998 – en/2006)</a></li>
<li><a href="#Day">The Day Watch (2000 – en/2007)</a></li>
<li><a href="#Twilight">The Twilight Watch (2003 – en/2007)</a></li>
<li><a href="#Last">The Last Watch (2006 – en/2008)</a></li>
<li><a href="#New">The New Watch (2011 – en/2012)</a></li>
<li><a href="#Sixth">The Sixth Watch (2012 – en/2013)</a></li>
<li><a href="#Mucho">Mucho Mojo (a Hap and Leonard Novel) (1994)</a></li>
<li><a href="#Mambo">The Two-Bear Mambo (a Hap and Leonard Novel) (1995)</a></li>
<li><a href="#Ultimate">Ultimate Threshold: A Collection of the Finest in Soviet Science Fiction (1970)</a></li>
<li><a href="#Midnight">Midnight at the Pera Palace: The Birth of Modern Istanbul (2014)</a></li>
<li><a href="#Bad">Bad Chili (a Hap and Leonard Novel) (1997)</a></li>
<li><a href="#Jungle">The Jungle Book (1894)</a></li>
<li><a href="#Star">Star Maker (1937)</a></li></ol><dl><dt class="field"><span id="American">American Gods (2002)</span></dt>
<dd><div class=" "><p>by <em>Neil Gaiman</em></p>
<p>This is a fantasy novel about gods. It is less about the nature of faith and more about the gods themselves: on how they are called into being by the myriad flickers of belief of humans, gaining power as this belief hardens to nigh-fanaticism. All gods have power, but many have faded as their believers have faded.</p>
<p>There are the old gods of early man, the gods of the Native Americans, the all-but-forgotten gods of even their precursors, the Egyptian pantheon, more recent African gods, the Norse pantheon, the plethora of spirits and pixies (piskies) and kobolds and gremlins and leprechauns of Europe. Gaiman doesn&rsquo;t once mention any Greek or Roman gods, oddly enough.</p>
<p>When people came over from Europe to America, they brought their gods with them. They nurtured the flame of belief in their minds, carrying a simulacrum from one shore to another. The original god remained in Europe or Africa or Asia and was aware of its copy in the new world. The copy flourished after a fashion, but soon discovered that America was poor soil for gods. Faith and belief guttered  and the gods were forgotten in favor of new gods, like Mammon. The copies become shadows, imbued with power, but left to fend for themselves in whatever way they could, going along to get along.</p>
<p>The Gods of Egypt run a funeral home, ferrying the dead to their final destination, as they always have. Odin, the all-father, is a grifter, running one scheme/scam after another. Bathsheba is a prostitute, consuming her faithful to stay alive.</p>
<p>The story centers on Shadow. He is serving time in prison for a crime of violence. He is due to be out soon. He has improved himself. He is a giant of a man, a former physical trainer. He has learned the ancient philosophers. He has learned coin tricks. His mind is clean and his soul is more-or-less pure. He is a stoic. He yearns to return to his wife and start a fresh life.</p>
<p>He is allowed to leave a few days early for a horrible reason: his wife is dead. She was killed in a car accident with his best friend, who was also to be his future employer. Shadow&rsquo;s dreams are truncated neatly. He has nowhere to go; nothing to do. He has only a funeral to attend and then nothing.</p>
<p>This is where Mr. Wednesday (named after his own day, HINT) swoops in to draw Shadow into his own plans. Shadow learns many things and meets many people (mostly gods) and learns that there is a war coming: between the old gods and the new.</p>
<p>The new gods are television, media, the Internet and so on. The new gods have the arrogance of youth, brash and powerful, feeling the power of the faith of millions coursing through their veins. They don&rsquo;t see the undercurrents of rot in America; they don&rsquo;t see that faith cannot take root in fallow soil. They don&rsquo;t know, as many of the old gods do, that they are doomed. Perhaps some do and they fear their demise and, American to the core, they ignore what they know and plow ahead, heedless of the damage and harm they cause for a few more moments of fleeting power.</p>
<p>The land is represented by a buffalo and is the most powerful, but least felt or seen. He/she appears only in Shadow&rsquo;s dreams. Whiskey Jack is also of the land, an odd bystander who exists outside of belief. The native gods are the ones most comfortable in this landscape, as is to be expected.</p>
<p>Wednesday schemes with  &lsquo;Low Key&rsquo; Lyesmith (guess who?) to bring the &ldquo;war&rdquo; to a head, a bloodbath of heretofore unheard-of proportions, all to fuel their power: Odin/Wotan&rsquo;s because the battle would be dedicated to him and Loki&rsquo;s because chaos is his milieu. Shadow foils this plan with his stoic self-sacrifice that ends up not killing him, but making him stronger. He tells the gods that they have been fooled into hating each other, into killing each other. They disperse, most going back to their meager existence on the edges of humanity. The status quo continues.</p>
<p>Gaiman weaves this tale around many side-narratives and fables of how various gods came to be, how they were carried over, how they survived. Recommended.</p>
<p>I&rsquo;ve included <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3496">notes, citations and errata</a> in a separate post.</p>
</div></dd>
<dt class="field"><span id="Stone">The Stone Sky (2017)</span></dt>
<dd><div class=" "><p>by <em>N. K. Jemisin</em></p>
<p>This is the third book of the Broken Earth series. The underground city of Castrima is no longer habitable after the epic battle at the end of the Obelisk Gate. Alabaster is gone, having been turned into a stone eater. Essun&rsquo;s arm below the elbow is also stone, leading her on the same path as Alabaster. This means that she can no longer perform orogeny without sacrificing parts of her body to stone. She can choose, though, so after the first time, where she loses a hand and part of an arm, she funnels the damage to a breast instead. But it&rsquo;s not really stone, is it? It&rsquo;s solidified magic and she is growing ever more adept at manipulating the magic that underlies orogeny, that is it&rsquo;s founding principle.</p>
<p>Jemisin weaves the massive myth ever larger, telling us of the deep history of mankind. How mankind built the obelisks to harness magic power, how humanity enslaved a race that was the master of deep magic, but not the master of technology. She tells of how this race was wiped out, but rebuilt in the form of several adepts who would become the original stone eaters (including Hoa). The ossification process Essun is undergoing—and which Alabaster completed—is the stone-eater&rsquo;s form of reproduction, of getting new members of their ancient race.</p>
<p>The story tells of how mankind bored down to the core—through the core—to tap what it thought would be an unlimited supply of magic, how humanity sought to harness this power with the original stone-eaters from a moon base and using the massive obelisks to focus their power. She tells of how Father Earth exists—and that he&rsquo;s pissed. He struck back, taking over some of the obelisks, thwarting the process, making humanity blow the moon out of orbit and starting the first of the Seasons that would plague the planet for dozens of Millennia.</p>
<p>The story of the Guardians is also fleshed-out: they are agents of Father Earth, imbued with magical power through a bit of the Earth&rsquo;s core lodged in their sessapinae (in their brains). The technology and the world and the history and myth is a wonderfully imagined and woven tale, bringing together many elements of magic and science and also strongly reflecting our own history, predilections and prejudices.</p>
<p>The plot follows Nassun as she ends up in a colony in Antarctica with her father Jija—and under the tutelage of Schaffa, her mother&rsquo;s former Guardian. Schaffa has changed, though, and is no longer fully under the control of Father Earth. He wants to help Nassun achieve her goal of <em>burning everything to the ground</em>—destroying the Earth and humanity that would produce such a blighted landscape and unending torture for her and her people (orogenes).</p>
<p>For this, she ventures to Corepoint, but first travels to an ancient city from which the attack on Father Earth was originally launched. Here, we learn more about its history, before she and Schaffa take an ancient monorail through the heart of the planet to Corepoint.</p>
<p>At the same time, Essun and the rest of Castrima adventure their way to Rennanis, the city that they defeated at the end of the second book. They establish themselves in this old and enormous city, but Essun knows she must move on. She must accompany Hoa, her stone-eater, to try to right what humanity broke many, many years ago. All of her friends come with her, traveling in a group through the center of the Earth, slipped through the strata by Hoa. They are attacked by other stone eaters along the way and there is attrition. </p>
<p>Essun seeks to recapture the Moon and put it back in orbit, to make peace with Father Earth and put an end to the seasons. She must fight Nassun on this—who wants to use the Obelisk Gate to plow the Moon into the Earth and kill everyone.</p>
<p>Having seen how the stone eaters live, Nassun changes her plan (she&rsquo;s only 10 or 11) and decides to use the power of the Obelisk Gate to change all of humanity into stone eaters instead. Essun battles against her, but eventually gives up, expending her last power to let her daughter have her own way and turning to stone. Nassun takes pity and fulfills her mother&rsquo;s plan instead, using the power of the Obelisk Gate to align the Moon back into its former orbit. Father Earth is pleased and agrees to a truce with mankind.</p>
<p>In the epilogue, Essun awakes as a stone eater and starts to pick up the pieces of an Earth that knows peace with Father Earth, that once again has a moon, with hopefully much-humbled humans and no more Seasons.</p>
<p>I&rsquo;ve included <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3507">notes, citations and errata</a> in a separate post.</p>
</div></dd>
<dt class="field"><span id="God">The God of Small Things (1997)</span></dt>
<dd><div class=" "><p>by <em>Arundhati Roy</em></p>
<p>This is a chronological jumble of images from the lives of a family in Kerala that languorously focuses to a story about India itself and its age-old problem with caste—with its inherent and deeply seated racism. The focus is on two time periods: the 50s and the 80s. In the 50s, a pair of odd twins (Rahel and Estha) are young and precocious. They eagerly await the arrival of another young girl (Sophie Mol) from England, with her mother. Her mother (Margaret) had divorced their uncle many years before.</p>
<p>Their uncle Chacko is a frustrated anglophile and faux-Communist. There are real communists (Comrade K. N. M. Pillai) in this story, there are untouchables. There are older generations whose story is told as well—of their upbringing in an even-more unforgiving world than the already-awful late 60s/early 70s in India. This is long after Partition, but still enemies are everywhere and anti-Communism rides high.</p>
<p>In the late 60s, the twins befriend and untouchable (Velutha) who is older than they. He is more their mother’s (Ammu) age—and those two become lovers. The family, deep-set in their racist ways, cannot abide this and punishes her. They send her away; she dies young. The children are scattered to the winds, only to return years later to the poisoned home, still run by the same inbred-thinking people who’d chased everyone away to protect themselves and their pitiful reputations (Baby Kochama and her erstwhile compatriot. Estha hasn’t spoken in years; Rahel drags around a lifetime of bad decisions, including a divorced husband in the States.</p>
<p>They all mostly live short, brutish lives of quiet desperation in a country that has no plan or pity for most of the people who live in it. Roy’s prose is beautiful at times, describing an India whose heart is decayed—and whose outward appearance becomes increasingly so.</p>
<p>I&rsquo;ve included <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3513">notes, citations and errata</a> in a separate post.</p>
</div></dd>
<dt class="field"><span id="Ministry">The Ministry of Utmost Happiness (2017)</span></dt>
<dd><div class=" "><p>by <em>Arundhati Roy</em></p>
<p>This is a story of Kashmir. It is a story of the downtrodden peoples of India, of the second-class quasi-citizens, of those at the edges of society who actually make up the large part of India&rsquo;s population. It is a story of those left behind, those ignored, those who protest the status quo, the communists, the Marxists, the Maoists, who cry for justice for all.</p>
<p>It is a story of fiction that starts off in the poorest neighborhoods of Delhi where a young girl is born in a boy&rsquo;s body. She has both parts and must decide which to keep. She names herself Anjum and moves into a community of fellow travelers, making a living in this community.</p>
<p>There is the starving professional, professorial protester, Dr. Azad Bharatiya. There is a man who named himself Saddam Hussein. There are four university friends who go their separate ways, crossing paths again and again throughout the dingy, evil history of India&rsquo;s occupation of Kashmir.</p>
<p>S. Tilottama is a reclusive young architect who doesn&rsquo;t work as an architect. Garson Hobart (Biplab Dasgupta) works in the Indian secret service, helping her out from time to time as well as being her landlord in latter years. Musa Yeswi drifts into the Kashmir conflict on the side of the militants, rising through the ranks—but only after his wife and daughter are killed by casual, careless Indian troops firing indiscriminately into a crowd out of fear at an exploding drinks container. His daughter is—or rather was—Miss Jebeen the first. And, finally, there is the rudderless and therefore successful &ldquo;journalist&rdquo; Nagaraj Hariharan, to whom Tilo is married for years, though her affair with Musa continues throughout. It&rsquo;s complicated.</p>
<p>Garson tells the story retrospectively, having moved back into the apartment that he&rsquo;d rented to Tilo after she&rsquo;d left for Anjum&rsquo;s compound built on a graveyard, where she finally finds peace and happiness in a community that includes her &ldquo;daughter&rdquo; Miss Jebeen the second. Garson goes through all of Tilo&rsquo;s notes about Musa&rsquo;s activities but, instead of using it against them all in his capacity as a high-level Indian secret-service operative, he becomes convinced of Kashmir&rsquo;s side of the argument—that India should remove itself and leave the people free.</p>
<p>The story is told out of order (as was <em>The God of Small Things</em>) and most of the people lead very unorthodox lives. Roy is highly critical of the direction of Indian society, highly critical of the rulers-that-be, of the duplicitous middle class. The path that India has taken is similar to that taken by the US: the historical and cultural racism of the caste system has had—and continues to have—the same disastrous effect as the endemic racism in America.</p>
<p>I&rsquo;ve included <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3522">notes, citations and errata</a> in a separate post.</p>
</div></dd>
<dt class="field"><span id="Alone">Alone on the Wall (2016)</span></dt>
<dd><div class=" "><p>by <em>Alex Honnold with David Roberts</em></p>
<p>This is an autobiography by a man not yet 30 years old. It&rsquo;s a bit presumptuous to write a biography so early, but that&rsquo;s the way the world is now. I wouldn&rsquo;t ordinarily read such a thing, but it was a gift from two very good friends, so I gave it a go.</p>
<p>Honnold is an excellent rock climber. He&rsquo;s very skilled and seemingly very lucky. I&rsquo;m convinced he can&rsquo;t tell the difference, taking credit for luck and crediting skill to luck. Still, he&rsquo;s done amazing things in the climbing world: he&rsquo;s most famous for his free solos of giant climbing walls in Yosemite and environs. He&rsquo;s most proud of what he calls his link-ups, multiple climbs in a single day, with logistics between them either by fast hiking/running or cycling.<br>
&nbsp;</p>
</div></dd>
<dt class="field"><span id="Ten">Ten Days that Shook the World (1919)</span></dt>
<dd><div class=" "><p>by <em>John Reed</em></p>
<p>This is a first-hand account of the ten days prior to and just after the Russian Revolution in November of 1917, John Reed was living in St. Petersburg as things got into full swing. He was a strongly left-leaning journalist with at least a partial grasp of the Russian language, though it&rsquo;s unclear how well he could read it. It&rsquo;s hard to believe that he didn&rsquo;t understand any of it, considering how much of the book seems to have been transcribed from meetings or conversations in the street.</p>
<p>The book offers an enthusiastic and detailed account of the involvement of the myriad participants and factions. The book covers many of the intrigues between factions involved in the revolutions as well as the external pressures of the other nations of Europe—Finland, England, Germany and others. These were trying from the very beginning to extinguish the Bolshevik revolution that they saw as an infectious threat to all that they&rsquo;d taken for themselves.</p>
<p>The Russian refusal to continue fighting alongside the other nations in WWI, throwing away its young men&rsquo;s lives for the capitalists, was the final straw: they had to be eliminated before they were allowed to show that another way was possible. Internal forces—particularly in the person of Yussov Djugashvili-Stalin took care of the rest.</p>
<p>I&rsquo;ve included <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3530">notes, citations and errata</a> in a separate post.</p>
</div></dd>
<dt class="field"><span id="Forever">The Forever War (1974)</span></dt>
<dd><div class=" "><p>by <em>Joe Haldeman</em></p>
<p>The parallels between the Forever War and the Vietnam War are not coincidental. This book was written at the tail-end of the Vietnam war by a veteran. In the Forever War, the enemy is an alien race that no-one has ever seen. The war starts with an incident and escalates quickly. There are years between incidents, relativistic limits being what they are. The soldiers are chosen from the best and the brightest—the elite scientists and minds of the current generation.</p>
<p>The story touches on many topics that would be covered again and again in subsequent novels, but which were featured first in this book. The population of Earth turns to homosexuality as a form of population control, the soldiers sent off to war experience jarring shifts in the culture to which they return—just like Vietnam veterans did—but in the Forever War, it&rsquo;s due to extreme time-dilation effects from their relativistic flights to their battlegrounds.</p>
<p>Haldeman conjectures that any given battle between humans and the Taurans could go either way because it was never clear which side was more advanced in any given confrontation. Because of relativistic travel times, it was possible for there to be nearly a century of additional scientific and military development between them.</p>
<p>Haldeman also likens what it would be like to return to Earth after many decades to the feeling of disjuncture experienced by any war veterans. What&rsquo;s the point of fighting at all when the homeland can barely remember that there&rsquo;s a war on at all? Why not run away when no-one can prove that you did? He discusses how language and culture shifts so much that returning soldiers need translators for both language and customs.</p>
<p>During the final battle, I was convinced that the Taurans didn&rsquo;t actually exist and that humans had actually been fighting themselves all along—just separated across relativistic time. This turned out not to be the case—instead the Taurans and the humans of the future have more in common with each other than the human soldiers of the past. The humans of the future become a hive-mind—just like the Taurans were all along.</p>
<p>I&rsquo;ve included <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3532">notes, citations and errata</a> in a separate post.</p>
</div></dd>
<dt class="field"><span id="Absrudity">The United States of Absurdity (2017)</span></dt>
<dd><div class=" "><p>by <em>Dave Anthony</em> and <em>Gareth Reynolds</em></p>
<p>This is a simple and short book full of odd stories about American history. The two authors host <em>The Dollop</em> podcast, during which they&rsquo;ve covered many of these stories already. Some of the older stories are interesting, less in how they&rsquo;re told, but for pointing out how cruel American society always has been.</p>
<p>One story in particular stuck with me: the one about lobotomy, in which the self-nominated doctor toured the country with his self-invented procedure, popping holes into people&rsquo;s heads over 3500 times during his career. Whatever one can say about the cruelty and stupidity of our age, we seem to be at least a few steps past letting confident people drill holes into our foreheads.</p>
</div></dd>
<dt class="field"><span id="Adults">Adults in the Room: My Battle with the European and American Deep Establishment (2017)</span></dt>
<dd><div class=" "><p>by <em>Yanis Varoufakis</em></p>
<p>As you can tell by the copious notes and citations I&rsquo;ve made below, I loved this book. It is the story of how Europe is just as fundamentally broken as any other human construction. If it every meant anything greater, it no longer does. It is a construct of self-serving functionaries bent on consolidating their own political capital. Its main goal is to provide wealth to the financial sector. It does not care for its member nations, as such. It does not care for long-term sustainability. It is afflicted by the same blinkered, short-term thinking that poisons most other human endeavors. It continues mainly on inertia, in some sense unaware that it is already dead. The corpse can still pump blood, so the vampires continue to feed.</p>
<p>This is the story of the five months during which Greek finance minister Yanis Varoufakis tried to save Greece from continued debt bondage. Continued debt bondage was seen as the only way forward for the European troika. Varoufakis preferred a debt-restructuring that benefitted both parties and had the added benefit of being financially feasible. The only other alternative acknowledged by both sides was Grexit—Greece leaving the euro zone and reëstablishing the drachma.</p>
<p>Varoufakis threatened Grexit and vowed never to comply to continued debt bondage. His government was behind him in this, until…almost the very end. Despite reams of proposals and studies and endorsement from extremely knowledgable individuals showing that Varoufakis&rsquo;s plans would be effective, the troika never seriously entertained them. Honestly, it&rsquo;s hard to believe that they even read them. They just didn&rsquo;t care. Their only goal was to arrange a new loan deal—because they were never interested in getting their money back.</p>
<p>How could this be? Because the money they were interested in getting back was loaned to Greece, immediately after which it was funneled right back to the true victims of Greece&rsquo;s financial crisis—the French and German banks that had loaned money to Greece in the first place. These banks took no haircut on their risky loans. The EU made sure that they were paid back in full, but that the Greek government took the full blame for the profligacy. </p>
<p>The troika wasn&rsquo;t interested in being paid back because, once the banks had recharged their coffers and learned the harsh lesson that they would not only not be allowed to fail, they would also not be allowed to <em>not</em> turn a profit, it was only the people of Europe who were left with outstanding debts. </p>
<p>And who cares about them when you and all of your friends have not only come out smelling like roses politically but also benefited handsomely financially? What could you do? It was those dirty, lazy Greeks who nearly ruined everything—thank God the troika came to the rescue to limit the losses and avoid true catastrophe.</p>
<p>Why did Varoufakis fail to save Greece from continued debt bondage? Because literally <em>everyone</em> was against him. They all hated him. It was obvious to the troika that he was never going to budge the way they wanted him to. They resented him for making them work that hard to get what they had always gotten much more easily.</p>
<p>They saw the result as inevitable; why bother struggling so hard and making everyone look bad? He was always going to look bad anyway, as the representative of a reprehensible land of swarthy, shiftless ingrates suckling at the teat of superior, northern, caucasian, European generosity.</p>
<p>His own side resented and grew to hate him because he was so much <em>smarter</em> and <em>more organized</em> and more <em>well-informed</em> than they were. He knew everything. He knew the history and the minutiae of everything that had happened in the EU in the last 20 years. He did not despair (at least not publicly). His ramrod discipline and dedication shamed his own leadership into continuing when they&rsquo;d long-since capitulated in their hearts. His presence became a constant reminder to them of their own moral failing and their failure of the Greek people.</p>
<p>As for his enemies in the EU and the IMF and ECB and Euro Group? They were just stunned that he&rsquo;d even dared to open his mouth at all—other than to pleasure them with it, as stipulated in their agreement with the previous government.</p>
<p>I imagine to them Varoufakis showed up like an escort whose pimp had extracted a very good price for someone who was accommodating and open to anything—only for her to show up and want to talk and cuddle and &ldquo;get to know one another&rdquo; so that they could &ldquo;figure out how to both come to orgasm&rdquo;.</p>
<p>The EU&rsquo;s incredulity was like that of the john in such a situation—simply uncomprehending how someone could so completely fail to be on-script. After the initial confusion, the way forward was clear: punishment and humiliation and, of course, the f$%king. I apologize for the invective, but it is not just to spare the degree of criminality with which the EU behaved by employing a more diplomatic vernacular.</p>
<p>And the other nations that backed Germany unquestioningly in the Euro Group, like Latvia, were like the members of the pimp&rsquo;s stable who had long since capitulated all honor—and were resentful of the uppity new broad who thought she was better than them. As Varoufakis points out, Latvia became the troika&rsquo;s darling, an economic success story, by proving that a country could tighten its belt to improve its per-capita GDP—but only by shedding half of its working population through emigration.</p>
<p>When Varoufakis re-hired cleaning staff fired during a previous administration, he was reproached endlessly by the EU for not being sufficiently dedicated to cutting costs. The cost of 300 cleaners making a pittance per month was nothing compared to the salaries of several advisers from big banks and financial institutions that Yanis simultaneously let go, of course. But that&rsquo;s not the point, is it? The troika were bent on punishing him for having fired its crony friends at Goldman Sachs (who&rsquo;d earned millions per year). The initial firing of the cleaning staff was described as a “reform”, the rolling back of which indicates an abdication of adherence to fiduciary responsibility.</p>
<p>This was the modus operandi for the troika, always demanding more and more from an increasingly harried and chronically understaffed finance department. And if it took Yanis a long time to realize that his enemy truly was an enemy that was not at all interested in a compromise, it wasn&rsquo;t his fault, really. In the heat of battle, and probably exhausted and sleep-deprived from having spent three straight days preparing a document they demanded and have now ignored, he failed to recognize their duplicitous nature.</p>
<p>He continued to give them the benefit of the doubt, assuming that they too saw the looming danger to everyone and were interested in working together to avoid the worst of it. They were not. Life had taught them all that they would be just fine, that they would continue to fail upward no matter what happened. I count nearly everyone he mentions in this book in this group—Lagarde, Poulson…everyone. Not a single one of them every did anything to actually help. No matter how much hand-wringing and soul-searching they play-acted behind closed doors, they always knew which side their bread was buttered on when it came to public pronouncements—and then they reverted to the most simplistic mantras that they all knew were ineffective and could not be implemented, but for which they could not be blamed for promoting.</p>
<p>They had all proved themselves liars and backstabbers, incapable of even a shred of honesty. Their paramount goal was to get everything they personally wanted while conceding nothing, on principle. He failed to notice that they considered it distasteful to deal with him at all. There was probably no small amount of disgust at the chutzpah of a filthy foreigner upstart daring to attend their institutions (he attended university in England in the 70s) and for daring to seem smarter and more reasonable than they, when it is they who wield the power and he who is to capitulate. Their fury was not at his proposals, but that he was wasting their time, making them pretend to do their jobs, while reminding them that they had always failed to do so. They punished him and Greece for daring to remove their mask of plausible deniability.</p>
<p>And when the time came to execute the only threat that Greece held over the troika, Yanis hesitated, convinced that his government had his back and that they would <span class="quote-inline">&ldquo;take collective responsibility for the decision over the precise timing of [Greece&rsquo;s] withdrawal from the negotiations.&rdquo;</span></p>
<p>They did not. And that is his regret: that he did not take unilateral action at the solitary moment when he had the power to do so. He opted for democracy and was betrayed by his compatriots. I think he’s too hard on himself.</p>
<p>And his friends in the Greek government didn&rsquo;t collapse all at once: no, the Troika had its agents embedded everywhere. <em>Steter Tropfen hoehlt den Stein</em>, as we say in German. They didn&rsquo;t have to push too much—we&rsquo;ve seen time and again how much human suffering a single person is willing to engender for what appears to be a ludicrously meager personal gain. How can you succeed when all your enemy need do is turn one functionary? And he probably sold out for a pittance? Even if it was blackmail, or the guy failed to grasp the import of his duplicity, he didn’t seem to care. An appeal to ego was probably sufficient.</p>
<p>I&rsquo;ve included <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3533">notes, citations and errata</a> in a separate post.</p>
</div></dd>
<dt class="field"><span id="Industrial">Industrial Society and its Future (1995)</span></dt>
<dd><div class=" "><p>by <em>Theodore Kaczynski</em></p>
<p>The full text of this long essay/short book is available online at <a href="https://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/national/longterm/unabomber/manifesto.text.htm">Unabomber Special Report</a> (<cite><a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/">Washington Post</a></cite>). To the Post&rsquo;s credit, it&rsquo;s still online after over 20 years. There is very little that is particularly incendiary about this document (if you&rsquo;ll pardon the phrase). Though his actions were mad—despite his railing against society&rsquo;s deprivation of freedom, he saw fit to rob several people of their own freedom by killing them—his reasoning is not.</p>
<p>I wanted to see what the fuss was about and what the Unabomber&rsquo;s actual demands were. His arguments are lucid, if not always convincing. I was expecting a bit more craziness, like in <em>Dianetics</em>, but Kaczynski was much smarter, apparently—he was certainly a better writer.</p>
<p>The essay is basically structured as follows:</p>
<ol>
<li>He rails against leftists for about 20% of the essay, discussing their psychology and &ldquo;oversocialization&rdquo;. As a university professor without a more rational and less strictly left-leaning tendency, he seems to have felt himself in a minority against which he needed to lash out. Some of the characteristics he pointed out are quite negative, but his inability to nail down who, exactly, he considers to be a leftist—or which modes of thought are the types of leftism to avoid—robs his argument of much of its power.</li>
<li>He then discusses different types of work, including <em>surrogate activities</em> and a definition of the <em>power process</em>.</li>
<li>He goes into detail in the <em>Disruption of the Power Process in Modern Society</em> chapter. Here he expands on an idea that the main goal of society is subjugation through disempowerment. He builds up the argument reasonably well, without too much bombast.</li>
<li>He discusses freedom and the logical tension between freedom and technology/industrial society. Pre-industrial societies are by definition more free because the lack of long-distance communication and travel prevent the overarching, larger systems of control that are inevitably wrought by technology (and those who control it).</li>
<li>He moves from mind control through propaganda to control via pharmaceuticals and genetic modification (even less far-fetched 20 years later).</li>
<li>From there, he discusses how technology becomes a self-promulgating end in itself, inevitably leading to a place where humankind is so dependent on it that it no longer matters whether it is in charge because it took over or because the humans capitulated. The dependency implies the control.</li>
<li>Next up are more predictions, many of which have unsurprisingly come true (or have been much more concretely realized than in the 90s). The world we have, dominated as it is by surveilling corporations and governments and a nearly useless media landscape is not far off from Kaczynski&rsquo;s nightmare vision.</li>
<li>Finally, there are concrete action plans and ideas for how to foment the required revolution to devolve society to pre-industry. He also acknowledges that it won&rsquo;t be easy, regardless of how he&rsquo;s proven its necessity if we are to survive as psychologically independent individuals with even a modicum of freedom (paraphrased from his ideas, by the way). There is a discussion of revolutionary techniques, how to build an intelligent core with rational argument and then bring the rabble on board with simpler reasoning (that is pitched to inspire the second group without alienating the first group). Any group that inspired such a devolution would necessarily be rejected for the loss in lifestyle that they&rsquo;d engendered, after which the technological elite would quickly take the reins again.</li>
<li>In the end, he manages to prove the inevitability of technology, the zero-sum game it has with individual freedom and the near impossibility of freedom winning out.</li></ol><p>I&rsquo;ve included <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3538">notes, citations and errata</a> in a separate post.</p>
</div></dd>
<dt class="field"><span id="Omelas">The Ones Who Walk Away from Omelas (1973)</span></dt>
<dd><div class=" "><p>by <em>Ursula K. LeGuin</em></p>
<p>This is a short story about Omelas, a city that is paradise on Earth. The story describes the perfection of the society—then gets to the one small detail that keeps the place so perfect. In order for everyone to be so happy, living in paradise, a child must be kept in perpetual misery, darkness and filth, trapped in a lightless dungeon and suffering immeasurably. As expected, almost everyone, upon learning of this situation, make their peace with it. The title refers to those who cannot accept paradise on those terms.</p>
</div></dd>
<dt class="field"><span id="Rogues">Rogues (2014)</span></dt>
<dd><div class=" "><p>edited by <em>George R.R. Martin and Gardner Dozois</em></p>
<p>This is a collection of short stories and novellas edited by two of the titans of fantasy and science fiction. See the <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rogues_(anthology)">Wikipedia article</a> for a list of all 21 stories. The stories all star a &ldquo;rogue&rdquo; of one type or other, with authors ranging from Gillian Flynn (Gone Girl) to Joe Lansdale (Hap and Leonard) to Neil Gaiman to Patrick Rothfuss and, finally, to George R.R. Martin himself. A good collection of stories with something for everyone, I think.</p>
<p>I&rsquo;ve included <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3555">notes, citations and errata</a> in a separate post.</p>
</div></dd>
<dt class="field"><span id="Lathe">The Lathe of Heaven (1971)</span></dt>
<dd><div class=" "><p>by <em>Ursula K. LeGuin</em></p>
<p>This is the story of George Orr, a man whose dreams change reality. He lives in a world where he&rsquo;s required to visit a psychiatrist to address his affliction. Soon, though, the world no longer requires him to do so—because his psychiatrist is manipulating him into changing the world to the doctor&rsquo;s benefit. Orr&rsquo;s effective dreams are not without side-effects—anyone who lives through one ends up with multiple memories, remembering both the way the world was and also the way the world is (including the history leading up to the world in which they now live). Doctor Haber invents a machine called the Augmentor that focuses Orr&rsquo;s power.</p>
<p>Orr&rsquo;s dreams don&rsquo;t change reality so much as shift himself and those around him into different timelines. Eventually, he chooses a timeline in which aliens invade the planet—ostensibly with the goal of finding him, the one capable of bending reality. The aliens don&rsquo;t try to stop so much as try to get him to control himself, to get out from under Dr. Haber&rsquo;s thumb. Orr is OK, but Haber is dangerous.</p>
<p>Philip K. Dick worked very much in this vein, where the line between observed and actual reality is blurred into nothingness. The story is a mix of various potential realities, composed of the dreams of Haber and Orr as well as strands of the original reality. Read the <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Lathe_of_Heaven">Wikipedia article</a> for a more in-depth description of the plot.</p>
<p>I&rsquo;ve included <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3564">notes, citations and errata</a> in a separate post.</p>
</div></dd>
<dt class="field"><span id="Beach">On the Beach (1957)</span></dt>
<dd><div class=" "><p>by <em>Nevil Shute</em></p>
<p>A nuclear conflagration has engulfed the world. In the aftermath, it&rsquo;s not clear who started it or who even fought on which side. Stories differ. There is the officially accepted truth—something to do with the Russians, the Chinese and the Americans. And then there are other theories that bubble up as we meet more people. All that is clear is that the entire northern hemisphere is gone. There is an inexorable radioactive cloud creeping southward at a predictable pace. Cities go dark, day by day.</p>
<p>The story takes place in Australia, centered on sailor Peter Holmes in the Australian navy, an entity that has all but ceased to exist. An American submarine lands on the shores of Melbourne. Peter befriends the caption of the vessel, Commander Towers. Although there are breaks with customs and morals, many of the people stick to their lives as they were. Until they&rsquo;re not anymore. The end.</p>
<p>There is a fuel shortage (of course) and the scope of life contracts back to earlier times, humanity slowly fading into oblivion with barely a whimper. Many take their own lives with government-provided pills. The submarine goes on several missions, but discovers nothing on the entire planet. It&rsquo;s all dead. There is no reprieve. There is no happy ending for humanity. The Earth has been boiled free of life—not instantly, but definitely.</p>
<p>I&rsquo;ve included <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3565">notes, citations and errata</a> in a separate post.</p>
</div></dd>
<dt class="field"><span id="Dispatches">Dispatches (1977)</span></dt>
<dd><div class=" "><p>by <em>Michael Herr</em></p>
<p>This is a journal about the Vietnam War, written by journalist Michael Herr, who spent two years there in the late 60s. The storytelling is visceral and well-written, describing soldiers and attacks and life in Vietnam under the occupation. The impression is surreal and the book doesn&rsquo;t try to explain or clean up the ugliness of it all. It presents information, within a scaffolding of disapproval of the war, but at the same time acknowledging the seductiveness of it for reporters, for those involved in it, for those poisoned into not being able to live without it. An excellent book, probably the best thing I&rsquo;ve ever read about one of America&rsquo;s wars—or, indeed, any colonial occupation. It&rsquo;s likely that this book describes them all adequately, not just Vietnam, but Iraq and Afghanistan or India and Africa for the European powers. A sobering look into the depths of human cruelty and stupidity. Herr has only one movie-writing credit: <em>Apocalypse Now</em>.</p>
<p>I&rsquo;ve included <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3566">notes, citations and errata</a> in a separate post.</p>
</div></dd>
<dt class="field"><span id="Savage">Savage Season: A Hap and Leonard Novel (1990)</span></dt>
<dd><div class=" "><p>by <em>Joe R. Lansdale</em></p>
<p>This is the story of Leonard, a gay, black veteran of Vietnam and his friend Hap, a guy with few prospects and a lot of baggage. This pair are tangled up in a heist—or, rather, picking up the lost treasure from a heist gone wrong—planned by people with differing motives and histories. That Hap&rsquo;s ex is involved makes it hard for him to think straight. Leonard is aware that the situation is far from ideal, but knows that he and Hap need the money.</p>
<p>The story weaves bygone days of 60s and 70s idealism with naked ambition and greed. Everything goes spectacularly south in an abattoir of a finale that would do a Tarantino film justice.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;All I got to say is you can’t be a professional bleeding heart. Yeah, things are better for blacks and women and gays, but it was the blacks and women and gays that did it, not fuck-ups like this bunch. Whites and straights came along to give help, all right, after the blacks said ‘enough’ and got their heads busted, and it’s the same for the gays and the women. The whites and straights, they control things, and they could have changed it anytime.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 839-843</div></div></div></dd>
<dt class="field"><span id="Grand">Grand Forks: A History of American Dining in 128 Reviews (2013)</span></dt>
<dd><div class=" "><p> by <em>Marilyn Hagerty</em></p>
<p>This is a collection of restaurant reviews from restaurants all over North Dakota, but mostly from the metropolitan region (such as it is) in and around Grand Forks. A couple of the reviews are of top-flight restaurants in New York City, thrown in seemingly to point out that Ms. Hagerty isn&rsquo;t just a country bumpkin.</p>
<p>Her book is refreshingly honest and simple, the reviews eminently useful, concentrating as they do on describing decor, menu and prices. She weaves stories of the proprietor&rsquo;s lives into her reviews. Through these, we follow how the city of Grand Forks grew over the years. The reviews start in the 80s and continue into the first decade of the 21st century. We also see how expectations of price and quality grew over the years—and how some restaurants managed to remain focused on providing quality food for what seems like nearly impossible prices for the time.</p>
<p>There was a bit of monotony to the reviews, a bit of ritual, but not of boredom, necessarily. Almost like a book of zen koans, delivered by a woman seemingly without malice. Almost like listening to a song by a favorite band that sounds very much like all of the other songs that band has made—it&rsquo;s nice to listen to, even though familiar.</p>
<p>I imagine that Marilyn&rsquo;s reviews served over the years as a bulwark against ugly reality for many residents.</p>
<p>I discovered this book when Anthony Bourdain died: someone I read had mentioned that he&rsquo;d written the foreword to Marilyn&rsquo;s book. His foreword is nicely written and generous and reveals a man capable of appreciating the simpler things, just like Marilyn. Appropriately, it is overshadowed by the simple power of Ms. Hagerty&rsquo;s reviews.</p>
<p>I&rsquo;ve included <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3563">notes, citations and errata</a> in a separate post.</p>
</div></dd>
<dt class="field"><span id="Laurie"><a href="https://stephenking.com/other/stephenking-laurie.pdf">Laurie</a> (2018)</span></dt>
<dd><div class=" "><p>by <em>Stephen King</em></p>
<p>This short story is available <a href="https://stephenking.com/other/stephenking-laurie.pdf">online</a> and is characteristic of King&rsquo;s writing of late: well-crafted but a bit staid and humdrum. It&rsquo;s about an old man living in Florida, without his wife and with a complicated relationship with his complicated sister, who gives him a dog he doesn&rsquo;t want. They meet an alligator. The end.</p>
<p>I thought this sentence describing the man&rsquo;s sister was nice:</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;She paused to look back at him. The harsh September light of Florida’s west coast fell on her face, showing the way her lipstick had bled into the little wrinkles around her mouth, and the way her lower lids had begun to sag away from her eyes, and the fragile clockspring of veins beating in the hollow of her temple. She would be seventy soon. His bouncing, opinionated, athletic, take-no-prisoners sister was old. So was he. They were proof that life was nothing but a short dream on a summer afternoon.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div></dd>
<dt class="field"><span id="Night">The Night Watch (1998 – en/2006)</span></dt>
<dd><div class=" "><p> by <em>Sergei Lukyanenko</em></p>
<p>This is the first novel in what would end up being a six-book series, set in the real world with the Twilight as a backdrop. The world is the same as the one we know, but some people are not humans, but Others. These others are divided (unevenly) into Dark and Light Ones. This book introduces characters that would be in all of the books, but focuses on the development of Anton Gorodetsky, a low-level Light Other who works in the Night Watch. The Night Watch works at night and keeps an eye on the Dark Others. The Day Watch works during the day and keeps an eye on the Light Others.</p>
<p>The Twilight is another layer of reality to which Others have access, but humans do not. It is from here that Others draw their power to perform magic. It&rsquo;s a very interesting mythology, equal to the Harry Potter world, I think, with a bit more for adults than the earlier books in that series.</p>
<p>In this book, Lukyanenko develops Anton as well as Sveltana (a Great Enchantress) and Egor (a potential Mirror) and Maxim (an eventual Inquisitor) as well as introducing Boris Ignatievich, or Gesar, the oldest and most powerful of the Light Ones in the Moscow Night Watch.</p>
<p>I&rsquo;ve included <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3567">notes, citations and errata</a> in a separate post.</p>
</div></dd>
<dt class="field"><span id="Day">The Day Watch (2000 – en/2007)</span></dt>
<dd><div class=" "><p> by <em>Sergei Lukyanenko</em></p>
<p>The second novel in the Twilight universe is again composed of three volumes, each of which tells another story that builds the mythos of the world further. In this one, we learn more about the witch Alisa Donnikova, who falls in love with a Light One named Igor. It ends in tragedy.</p>
<p>We also meet Vitaly Rogoza, a mysterious Ukrainian who is inexplicably amnesiac <em>and</em> growing continuously in power. It turns out that he is a Mirror, a pawn of the Twilight itself, drawn into existence in order to return balance between the Light and the Dark. He does this by drawing out Svetlana (the Great Enchantress, who is now Anton&rsquo;s partner) and getting her to purge her immense power and giving the Dark some reprieve.</p>
<p>In the third volume, we meet Edgar, a Dark one who achieves an uneasy peace with Anton on a mission to investigate what the hell happened in the first two volumes. They are both in Prague for the Inquisition&rsquo;s trial of Igor, who&rsquo;d murdered Alisa in the first book. More and more facets of the mythology are introduced, filling in detail with delicious hints of deeper meaning.</p>
</div></dd>
<dt class="field"><span id="Twilight">The Twilight Watch (2003 – en/2007)</span></dt>
<dd><div class=" "><p> by <em>Sergei Lukyanenko</em></p>
<p>These three volumes continue with Anton as the focus, but with many of the characters of the first two books. The first volume involves an undiscovered Other who turns out to be Gesar&rsquo;s son. But it&rsquo;s suspicious because he seems to have <em>become</em> an Other—something that should not be possible. Unless someone has discovered the <em>Fuaran</em>, a book written by a witch who discovered how to do exactly that. The knowledge was assumed to have been lost in the mists of time.</p>
<p>Instead, the second volume finds Anton on vacation, where he meets Arina, an ancient witch who breaks tradition and expectations in almost all ways. She is immensely powerful and doesn&rsquo;t really stick the Dark/Light paradigm, which vexes Anton. She has a copy of the <em>Fuaran</em>. It is in this book that we discover that Others actually have <em>less</em> magic than humans. Humans <em>emit</em> magic regularly and Others <em>feed on it</em>. Anton is shocked to discover that there isn&rsquo;t that much separating him from a Dark vampire, whose methods are just a bit cruder and most physical. We also learn of more and more levels of the twilight (in the first book, there was one, at most two; by now, we know of four, perhaps five).</p>
<p>The third volume expands on Kostya&rsquo;s story (a (now)-Higher vampire who Anton has known since he was a youth). Kostya is intent on getting the <em>Fuaran</em> in order to turn <em>everyone</em> into an Other. This plan is doomed to failure—you can&rsquo;t just have parasites; you also need hosts. Kostya&rsquo;s plan fails. He tries to escape into space in order to be able to perform a spell on the entire world at once. In space, though, he is too far from the source of Power. He burns up on re-entry.</p>
</div></dd>
<dt class="field"><span id="Last">The Last Watch (2006 – en/2008)</span></dt>
<dd><div class=" "><p> by <em>Sergei Lukyanenko</em></p>
<p>As a result of Kostya&rsquo;s activity with the <em>Fuaran</em> in the previous book, Anton is now a Higher magician. Gesar sends him to Scotland to investigate a mysterious vampire killing. It turns out that there is a trio of Others—a Light One, a Dark One and an Inquisitor—trying to get at Merlin&rsquo;s greatest creation. Merlin is/was a so-called zero-point magician—a magician who was zero natural magic and can absorb more Power from the environment than any Others and is therefore more powerful. The only other known such magician is Nadya, Anton and Svetlana&rsquo;s daughter. In this volume, we learn that Merlin hid the Crown of All Things on the seventh level of the Twilight.</p>
<p>The second volume expands on this, sending Anton to Uzbekistan to find Rustam, an ancient wizard who used to ride with Gesar, back in the day. He was with Gesar when they called down the most terrible spell every used against Dark Ones—the White Mist. Instead of killing them, it froze them into statues without any sensory input, driving them mad over the ensuring millennia. Rustam is still punishing himself for having taken part in this travesty, whereas Gesar had made his peace with it. We discover that Edgar is the Inquisitor that is part of the trio trying to get Merlin&rsquo;s secret.</p>
<p>In the third volume, more is revealed about Merlin&rsquo;s spell as well as how the Twilight works and how many levels it actually has. Where is the Crown of All Things hidden? Anton eventually finds out and uses his Higher power to wield it in an unexpected way, freeing the age-old Dark Ones frozen in time to their final reward—as well as Merlin and thousands of Others from the Purgatory/Paradise of the sixth level of the Twilight.</p>
<p>I&rsquo;ve included <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3568">notes, citations and errata</a> in a separate post.</p>
</div></dd>
<dt class="field"><span id="New">The New Watch (2011 – en/2012)</span></dt>
<dd><div class=" "><p> by <em>Sergei Lukyanenko</em></p>
<p>The first volume deals with Prophets and Clairvoyants and how the Twilight deals with them. We learn that the Twilight has not just Mirrors, but Tigers. The Tiger is unstoppable and is there to prevent anyone from hearing a Prophet&rsquo;s &ldquo;main prophecy&rdquo;. Anton is there, once again, this time with the help of his now ten-year–old daughter, Nadya (the zero-point enchantress). The young prophet is saved from the Tiger in the nick of time—but the Twilight doesn&rsquo;t know about recording devices. And Kesha (the Prophet) was clutching a toy tape recorder when he emerged from the room into which he&rsquo;d revealed his prophecy to (supposedly) no-one.</p>
<p>In the second volume, Anton travels once again to London to meet a former Prophet, a Dark One named Erasmus Darwin to find out what his prophecy was and to find out more about Tigers and how to stop them. Darwin had avoided dying for his prophecy in a similar way to Kesha—by yelling into into the bole of an oak tree. Anton returns from London with a cup made from the wood of that tree.</p>
<p>I&rsquo;ve included <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3569">notes, citations and errata</a> in a separate post.</p>
</div></dd>
<dt class="field"><span id="Sixth">The Sixth Watch (2012 – en/2013)</span></dt>
<dd><div class=" "><p> by <em>Sergei Lukyanenko</em></p>
<p>This is final installment in the Watch Series. In this one, Anton&rsquo;s daughter Nadya is threatened at her school, where two magicians sweep through with a power completely beyond what each has on his own. The prophets have foretold attacks of this sort and predict the end of the world in five days&rsquo; time.</p>
<p>We learn more about the ancient order of the vampires—the world&rsquo;s supposed first children. The day and night watch of Moscow are basically working together, attending the high councils of the vampires and witches as they each seek to elect a member to be part of the Sixth Watch. There are also the form-takers and the Foundation. All representatives of the watch will likely die when the council convenes.</p>
<p>The watch is there to combat the Twilight itself, which is embodied in a human-like figure. In the end, it is Anton who thwarts the twilight and restores order and balance.</p>
<p>I&rsquo;ve included <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id= 3582">notes, citations and errata</a> in a separate post.</p>
</div></dd>
<dt class="field"><span id="Mucho">Mucho Mojo (a Hap and Leonard Novel) (1994)</span></dt>
<dd><div class=" "><p>by <em>Joe R. Lansdale</em></p>
<p>This is the second Hap and Leonard novel. This one picks up where the first one left off—with the two heroes down on their luck and back to working in the rose fields, for peanuts. Leonard gets a sort of windfall—his uncle Chester has died and left him with a sizable inheritance as well as his house.</p>
<p>The house is in a rough neighborhood and right next to a crack den. Leonard cannot let that stand, so he takes them on immediately. They&rsquo;re a big problem, but they&rsquo;re not the main problem. The main problem seems to be a case that the police refused to work on, but that Chester and his friend Moon had been working for years. Moon is missing as well.</p>
<p>Hap and Leonard discover this from strange clues that Chester left—and then discover a child&rsquo;s skeleton under the house, wrapped in child pornography. They suspect Chester, of course, but Leonard is adamant that he couldn&rsquo;t have done it.</p>
<p>I won&rsquo;t ruin any more of the story, but it unfolds in a very interesting manner. The reverend and sheriff are involved, as is big ol&rsquo; TJ. Leonard and Hap stay true and stay on the trail to figure it all out in the end. To get a flavor for the style of writing, check out the citations.</p>
<p>I&rsquo;ve included <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3599">notes, citations and errata</a> in a separate post.</p>
</div></dd>
<dt class="field"><span id="Mambo">The Two-Bear Mambo (a Hap and Leonard Novel) (1995)</span></dt>
<dd><div class=" "><p>by <em>Joe R. Lansdale</em></p>
<p>This is the third of the Hap and Leonard novels. Florida Grange has gone to Grovetown to represent a client, the son of a famous bluesman from the same town. The son thinks he&rsquo;s found an old tape that could be worth a lot of money.</p>
<p>Chief Hanson, with whom Florida broke up before leaving, sends Hap to go look for her. Hap takes Leonard along. Grovetown does not approve. This town is so racist, it&rsquo;s like an Enlightenment black hole. Chief Cantuck is not a great guy, but not the worst. Officer Reynolds is the worst. Even worse is the head of the local KKK—a group to which most of the town belongs.</p>
<p>Hap and Leonard go poking around and can&rsquo;t help but stir up trouble, since Leonard is the wrong color. They end up getting beaten within and inch of their lives—they got in some shots, too, but were taking on most of the town—and slink back to Laborde with Officer Charlie.</p>
<p>They recover somewhat and regain their courage after a while, driving into the teeth of a rainstorm that will not quit to finish their investigation in Grovetown. After eliminating the obvious suspects, they finally figure out that it&rsquo;s Florida&rsquo;s disappearance and that of her client, was more about money than about racism. Cold comfort.</p>
<p>As with the second novel, I think the citations give a food flavor of the writing and sentiment.</p>
<p>I&rsquo;ve included <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3600">notes, citations and errata</a> in a separate post.</p>
</div></dd>
<dt class="field"><span id="Ultimate">Ultimate Threshold: A Collection of the Finest in Soviet Science Fiction (1970)</span></dt>
<dd><div class=" "><p>translated and edited by <em>Mirra Ginsburg</em></p>
<p>The stories are from the sixties and early seventies. The cover a range of topics from immortality, DNA and scientific discovery, as well as the morality of killing AIs. Basically, it&rsquo;s really quite interesting silver-age science fiction as good as anything I&rsquo;ve read from Great Britain or the States. You&rsquo;d be hard-pressed to say which was which.</p>
<p>I&rsquo;ve read and watched a lot of Soviet science fiction over the last couple of years, much it written by the Strugatsky brothers and directed by Tarkovsky. Just this year, I read a six-book series by Sergei Lukyanenko. It was fascinating to find this old book in my collection from my early, early years. I didn&rsquo;t remember any of the stories from my first reading; I imagine I&rsquo;d experienced it completely differently than this time around.</p>
</div></dd>
<dt class="field"><span id="Midnight">Midnight at the Pera Palace: The Birth of Modern Istanbul (2014)</span></dt>
<dd><div class=" "><p>by <em>Charles King</em></p>
<p>This book is a history of Istanbul from its very earliest days—before it was even Constantinople—up until the end of World War II. It&rsquo;s a tremendous work, using the Pera Palace (a famous and much-frequented hotel) as a focal point in modern times.</p>
<p>It is fascinating to learn about the mix of cultures that led to Istanbul—and, indeed, to Turkey. The Greeks and Jews were an intrinsic part, right up until the end. There were purges and seizing of family wealth, with strong parallels to the overthrow of the Tsars in Russia. The ties went deeper after the revolution, when Trotzky lived there for years, in exile.</p>
<p>It&rsquo;s the crossroads of Europe and Asia, providing rail access to Russia, hosting one of the terminuses of the Orient Express. The history covers the rise of Ataturk as well a slew of activists and contributors to Turkey&rsquo;s rich, political history. As a neutral country during WWII, it hosted secret-service agencies from all countries, offering a sort of hallowed ground where they could meet, if need be.</p>
<p>Turkey joined WWII even later than the U.S. and had a complicated relationship to the Axis and Allied nations, especially as related to getting European refugees of all kinds out of Axis-occupied nations. Their neutrality looked like appeasement. The bureaucracy was maddening. Whereas tens of thousands of people made it through to Israel and the Middle East, just as many were rejected and sent back where they&rsquo;d come from, into the teeth of the Nazi machine.</p>
<p>After that, Ararat&rsquo;s secularist state was increasingly muslimized, with Jews and other denominations (e.g. Greek Orthodox) being increasingly culled. It&rsquo;s a difficult history, though nothing to be especially ashamed of, as compared to other, actually colonial, fascist or imperial nations. It&rsquo;s hard to summarize the whole book, so I leave you with the following, from near the end (I&rsquo;ve included a longer version of the citation below):</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;National history asks that we take the impossibly large variety of human experience, stacked up like a deck of playing cards, and pull out only the national one—the rare moments in time when people raise a flag and misremember a collective past—as the most worthy of our attention.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 374</div></div><p>I&rsquo;ve included <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3601">notes, citations and errata</a> in a separate post.</p>
</div></dd>
<dt class="field"><span id="Bad">Bad Chili (a Hap and Leonard Novel) (1997)</span></dt>
<dd><div class=" "><p>by <em>Joe R. Lansdale</em></p>
<p>Hap starts off the book with rabies. Leonard starts off the book as a suspect in the murder of a biker who was fooling around with Raul. Hap&rsquo;s rabies leads him to meet Brett Sawyer, a dirty night nurse with whom he begins a torrid affair. Leonard and Hap investigate to clear Leonard&rsquo;s name, all the while staying out of the reach of the law—except for Charlie, who&rsquo;s almost certain that Leonard didn&rsquo;t do it.</p>
<p>Things get more complicated as the biker turns out to have been not only an undercover cop, but also a <em>dirty</em> (different meaning than for Brett) undercover cop. In the mix is a local Chili King, who&rsquo;s got a lot of markets cornered and is mixed up in some very sordid businesses. There&rsquo;s also the matter of some videotapes that show gay guys getting thrashed for being gay. They team up with Jim-Bob Luke—a private investigator with a lot of luck and very loose ethics—to finally crack the case.</p>
<p>I&rsquo;ve included <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3611">notes, citations and errata</a> in a separate post.</p>
</div></dd>
<dt class="field"><span id="Jungle">The Jungle Book (1894)</span></dt>
<dd><div class=" "><p>by <em>Rudyard Kipling</em></p>
<p>I was surprised to learn that the movie is based only on the first three of seven stories in this book. The first three are of a Mowgli who is considerably more adult than the films lead one to believe. He is a child at the very beginning, when he is, indeed, adopted by wolves. However, the story very quickly picks up from a point where he is more-or-less a man and is more than a match for most other creatures of the jungle or civilization.</p>
<p>The first story ends with Mowgli driving off Shere Khan (the tiger) with the &ldquo;red flower&rdquo;: fire. Akela (the lead wolf) stays in control of the pack. In the second part, he is kidnapped by the monkeys (the &ldquo;Bandar-log&rdquo;) and is rescued by Kaa (python), Baloo (bear) and Bagheera (black panther). The movie was relatively faithful here, as well, taking liberties only in inventing &ldquo;King Louie&rdquo;, king of the orangutans. The monkeys are not individualized and are not treated as co-equal jungle denizens by the other animals.</p>
<p>In the third part, Mowgli goes to live in the village with men. Shere Kahn continues to cause trouble and, with his acolytes, takes over the wolf pack. Mowgli is herding cows for the village. He hears from his animal friends that Shere Kahn is nearby and, that he just fed and will be slow and sleepy. Mowgli hatches a plan to drive his cattle through the canyon where Shere Kahn sleeps, trapping him and then trampling him. Akela and Gray brother wolf are instrumental in Shere Kahn&rsquo;s demise. Despite his advanced age, Akela is restored as leader of the pack. Mowgli returns to the jungle,</p>
<p>The fourth story is of Kotick, a white-furred seal, son of the greatest fighter of all the seals. His father fights each year for a place for his family on the shores of an island shared with men. Men sneak into the rear lines and take many seals each year. Kotick does not understand why they return to that island. His father is powerful and is not in danger (other than the grievous wounds he suffers each year in defending his place). Kotick instead travels the world, growing powerful. Finally, he swims with seacows to discover a secluded cove/island, protected from the eyes of man. There is plenty of room for all—he returns to the original island to bring his tribe with him. They refuse, so he fights them <em>all</em>. His savagery and power awe everyone, including his father. Convinced, many of them go with him and discover that he was right all along. Men no longer plunder their tribe.</p>
<p>The fifth story is the also-famous one of Rikki-Tikki-Tavi, the mongoose who defended a family from cobras. The cobra couple Nag and Nagina plot to kill members of the family, but Rikki jumps in and kills Nag. Furious, Nagina swears revenge, but Rikki goes on the offensive, attacking her nest and destroying all but one egg. She takes the last egg back her nest, but Rikki plunges after her—although very few mongooses ever return from a cobra nest. The other animals in the yard wait with bated breath, until Rikki emerges victorious, bruised but not beaten. Nag and Nagina are dead and no eggs have survived.</p>
<p>The sixth story is of Toomai, the son of a mahout, master of the elephant Kala Nag. They are tasked with catching wild elephants. Toomai helps but is reprimanded for being in the elephant enclosure. The boss tells him he may only return once he has &ldquo;seen elephants dance&rdquo;. He thinks that he has banished the boy for good. Kala Nag takes the boy along on the next giant meeting of wild and domesticated elephants. On the night of the dance, they all break their chains and trample acres of forest. The boss cannot deny that they&rsquo;d danced and that Toomai had seen it and welcomes him as a mahout.</p>
<p>The final story follows the conversations of the various animals employed by the British on a battle field in Afghanistan. The mules, camels, horses, bullocks and elephants detail their fears and tasks and how and why they serve. The animals that already serve the queen are there to convince the Afghan animals that they should obey, as well. I suppose there&rsquo;s a metaphor in there somewhere.</p>
<p>I&rsquo;ve included <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3612">notes, citations and errata</a> in a separate post.</p>
</div></dd>
<dt class="field"><span id="Star">Star Maker (1937)</span></dt>
<dd><div class=" "><p>by <em>Olaf Stapledon</em></p>
<p>This book is the description of an astral journey. The author describes leaving his home to take a walk to a local hilltop and then going much, much further. He travels the remaining distance—in all four dimensions—in his mind. He starts off in the local solar system, but quickly ranges to other stars, flitting to and fro, without regard for the speed of light. At first, he talks of blue and red shifts, but he soon realizes he can travel free of physical constraint by attuning himself to an &ldquo;affinity&rdquo; for worlds that have intelligent life on them.</p>
<p>This all sounds absolutely bizarre, but the book was written in 1937, in the early Einstein era. It&rsquo;s a remarkably sophisticated treatise and holds up reasonably well, even today. He posits the fast mode of travel in order to be able to describe what he experienced.</p>
<p>He is also capable of &ldquo;landing&rdquo; on planets and merging with the consciousness of individuals there. He spends a long time on a planet of quasi-human beings who experience the world more through scent than through visual apprehension. At the end of his sojourn, his host leaves with him and, together, they range across star systems.</p>
<p>The overarching theme is communal life and intelligence. He talks of ever-higher levels of intelligence, straining to a perfection, to being worthy of returning to the so-called Star Maker. Clan intelligences form nation intelligences, which form world intelligences, then star-system and, finally, galactic intelligences.</p>
<p>At this point, the story picks up temporal speed and they talk of visiting other galaxies. Each of these galaxies is in a different level of development toward a hive mind. Some of their powers are awesome: they can move planets and stars. There is talk of decay, where some civilizations fail. At one point, all of the stars begin exploding—at which point it is discovered that they, too, are intelligent. Their society is folded into the galactic ones. And so on, and so forth.</p>
<p>In the end, the author is part of the cosmic mind, the sum total of all galactic intelligences that sees through to the Star Maker and looks on his many works, of which this universe is but one. It is a sort-of ecclesiastic re-telling of the Big Bang, with some of the Star Maker&rsquo;s creations collapsing back and others dispersing until a heat death.</p>
<p>The thought experiment folds back in on itself as the author subsides back into his body and returns to his wife and home, that which he now realizes is the most important, the seed of all that is to follow.</p>
<p>As noted in <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Star_Maker">Wikipedia</a>, prominent contemporaries like Jorge Luis Borges, H.G. Wells, Virginia Woolf, Brian Aldiss, Doris Lessing (recent Nobel Prize winner), Arthur C. Clarke and Stanislaw Lem held this book and its author in high esteem. Even Freeman Dyson credited his &ldquo;Dyson Spheres&rdquo; to Stapledon, since he&rsquo;d already envisioned them in this book.</p>
<p>I&rsquo;ve included <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3613">notes, citations and errata</a> in a separate post.</p>
</div></dd>
</dl>      </div>
      </div>
        <div class="footer">
    <div class="footer-data"><div class="footer-links"><ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/contact.php" title="">Contact</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/support.php" title="">Support</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/privacy.php" title="">Privacy</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/rights.php" title="">Rights</a></li></ul></div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="copyright">Copyright (c) 1999-2026 earthli.com. All Rights Reserved.</div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="versions">Powered by <ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore/app_news.php">earthli News 3.7</a></li><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore" title="">earthli WebCore&trade; 3.7</a></li></ul></div></div>    </div>
      </div>
  </div>  </body>
</html>
]]>
  </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
      <title type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[The Two-Bear Mambo (a Hap and Leonard Novel) by Joe R. Lansdale (1995) (read in 2018)]]>
  </title>
    <id>https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3600</id>
    <link href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3600"/>
    <updated>2018-12-27T22:10:03+01:00</updated>
    <author>
        <name type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[Marco von Ballmoos]]>
  </name>
      <uri>https://earthli.com/users/marco</uri>
    </author>
      <summary type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<blockquote class="quote abstract "><div>Disclaimer: these are notes I took while reading this book. They include citations I found interesting or enlightening or particularly well-written. In some cases, I&rsquo;ve pointed out which of these applies to which citation; in others, I have not. Any benefit you gain from reading these notes is... [<a class="complete-text-link" href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3600">More</a>]</div></blockquote>]]>
  </summary>
      <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<html lang="en">
  <head>
    <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/themes/ice.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/fonts/raleway.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/core/medium.css">
  </head>
  <body>
<div class="style-controls">  <div class="page">
    <div class="page-body">
<div class="info-box-top">
<p>
Published by <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_user.php?name=marco" title="Marco von Ballmoos" class="visible">marco</a> on <span class="date-time">27. Dec 2018 22:10:03 (GMT-5)</span>
</p>
</div>
      <div class="text-flow wide">
  <blockquote class="quote abstract "><div>Disclaimer: these are notes I took while reading this book. They include citations I found interesting or enlightening or particularly well-written. In some cases, I&rsquo;ve pointed out which of these applies to which citation; in others, I have not. Any benefit you gain from reading these notes is purely incidental to the purpose they serve of reminding me what I once read. Please see Wikipedia for a summary if I&rsquo;ve failed to provide one sufficient for your purposes. If my notes serve to trigger an interest in this book, then I&rsquo;m happy for you.</div></blockquote><p>This is the third of the Hap and Leonard novels. Florida Grange has gone to Grovetown to represent a client, the son of a famous bluesman from the same town. The son thinks he&rsquo;s found an old tape that could be worth a lot of money.</p>
<p>Chief Hanson, with whom Florida broke up before leaving, sends Hap to go look for her. Hap takes Leonard along. Grovetown does not approve. This town is so racist, it&rsquo;s like an Enlightenment black hole. Chief Cantuck is not a great guy, but not the worst. Officer Reynolds is the worst. Even worse is the head of the local KKK—a group to which most of the town belongs.</p>
<p>Hap and Leonard go poking around and can&rsquo;t help but stir up trouble, since Leonard is the wrong color. They end up getting beaten within and inch of their lives—they got in some shots, too, but were taking on most of the town—and slink back to Laborde with Officer Charlie.</p>
<p>They recover somewhat and regain their courage after a while, driving into the teeth of a rainstorm that will not quit to finish their investigation in Grovetown. After eliminating the obvious suspects, they finally figure out that it&rsquo;s Florida&rsquo;s disappearance and that of her client, was more about money than about racism. Cold comfort.</p>
<p>As with the second novel, I think the citations give a food flavor of the writing and sentiment.</p>
<h2>Citations</h2><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Now, the stories I heard were off the late-night news. Rapes and serial murders and child molestations. Children with guns and no imagination and less ambition. It wasn’t a world my father would have understood. Last time I had seen him was a Christmas many years ago. He looked as if he’d just viewed the new world he was living in for the very first time and didn’t like it and didn’t want to stay. He was dead in two weeks. A heart attack and he was out of there.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 523-527</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;I also remembered a verse my daddy told me. “You end up havin’ to hit some sonofabitch, don’t just hit him once, and don’t just hit to get his attention.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 936-938</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;You think to be important you got to be some kind of Wall Street stockbroker or Nobel Prize winner. Listen here. You’re a good man and my friend, and we’re true as we know how to be to what we think is right. I don’t know what else there is that matters. All that other shit is just cake decoration.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 1067-1070</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;He reached the car dancing and grinning, stopped and laughed.</p>
<p>&ldquo;“Damn,” he said, “give an accordion to a redneck and all he can do is play ‘Home on the Range’ or some goddamn polka, give it to a coonass and he’ll make the music crawl up your butt and play with your kidneys.”&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 1348-1351</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>One less nigger was like one less cockroach.”</p>
<p>“ ’Course,” Leonard said, “cockroaches can’t play basketball.”</p>
<p>“Yeah, the jump shots throw ’em. I’ll tell you about Bobby Joe, kinda guy he was. He raped his own nephew’s wife, then when she told on him and the nephew tried to do something about it, he cut the nephew up to where he near died, went after the woman. Rumor is he made her fuck his German shepherd.”</p>
<p>“Oh, get out of here,” I said.</p>
<p>“I’m tellin’ you the story,” Tim said. “I can’t prove it. Haven’t got photos or nothing, but I believe it. There wasn’t nothing Bobby Joe wouldn’t do short of a law degree.”</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 1468-1476</div></div><p>Even if not true, the metadata that people are willing to believe it, is valuable information.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;“Y’all got money?” she said. Like son, like mother.</p>
<p>&ldquo;“We can buy lunch and have dessert if the waiters don’t wear suits,” Leonard said.&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 1614-1617</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;The kitchen was just another part of the same room, and you could see where there had been a grease fire over the stove. The dank carpet and burnt insulation odor that tracked us from the living room blended with the stench of rancid grease coating the stove top. The fridge hummed desperately, like a dying man trying to remember a sentimental tune.</p>
<p>&ldquo;“Well,” Leonard said, “this is nice.”</p>
<p>&ldquo;“Don’t like it, go to hell,” said Ms. Garner. She said that without so much as a change of features.</p>
<p>&ldquo;“So much for the big sell,” Leonard said. “How much is it? Considering we’ll be camping out.”</p>
<p>&ldquo;“Ten dollars a day, pay by the day. Use too much gas or electricity, there’ll be a charge for that. I watch the meters.”</p>
<p>&ldquo;“This place looks like you found it when it floated downriver after a fire and tornado,” Leonard said.&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 1628-1637</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>"I never said that I was invincible.”</p>
<p>“No, but you thought it. Leonard did anyway, and I think you thought he was invincible on some level. Could take anything and come out on top. And when the two of you are together, well, you’re like the biggest dogs in the junkyard. But you ain’t. You’re just two dogs and there’s always someone bigger, smarter, and meaner.”</p>
<p>“I owe you for this session?”</p>
<p>“First session’s free. Maybe you’ve seen little shadows, chinks in your and Leonard’s armor, and you don’t like it. It’s nothing to be ashamed of. No one is anything better than human. Just some humans are better humans than others, but the best humans are still just human. In the end, we all end up like that squirrel out there.”</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 3689-3696</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>“It’s just a way of living your life, and I personally don’t know it’s better than any other, it’s just all we know.”</p>
<p>“I don’t get it,” Raul said. “Why all this macho?”</p>
<p>“When I say act like a man,” Leonard said, “I mean act honorably and with courage. Macho has been turned into a bad word by turds who act like beasts, not men.”</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 3830-3834</div></div>      </div>
      </div>
        <div class="footer">
    <div class="footer-data"><div class="footer-links"><ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/contact.php" title="">Contact</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/support.php" title="">Support</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/privacy.php" title="">Privacy</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/rights.php" title="">Rights</a></li></ul></div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="copyright">Copyright (c) 1999-2026 earthli.com. All Rights Reserved.</div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="versions">Powered by <ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore/app_news.php">earthli News 3.7</a></li><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore" title="">earthli WebCore&trade; 3.7</a></li></ul></div></div>    </div>
      </div>
  </div>  </body>
</html>
]]>
  </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
      <title type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[Mucho Mojo (a Hap and Leonard Novel) by Joe R. Lansdale (1994) (read in 2018)]]>
  </title>
    <id>https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3599</id>
    <link href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3599"/>
    <updated>2018-12-27T21:57:08+01:00</updated>
    <author>
        <name type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[Marco von Ballmoos]]>
  </name>
      <uri>https://earthli.com/users/marco</uri>
    </author>
      <summary type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<blockquote class="quote abstract "><div>Disclaimer: these are notes I took while reading this book. They include citations I found interesting or enlightening or particularly well-written. In some cases, I&rsquo;ve pointed out which of these applies to which citation; in others, I have not. Any benefit you gain from reading these notes is... [<a class="complete-text-link" href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3599">More</a>]</div></blockquote>]]>
  </summary>
      <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<html lang="en">
  <head>
    <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/themes/ice.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/fonts/raleway.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/core/medium.css">
  </head>
  <body>
<div class="style-controls">  <div class="page">
    <div class="page-body">
<div class="info-box-top">
<p>
Published by <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_user.php?name=marco" title="Marco von Ballmoos" class="visible">marco</a> on <span class="date-time">27. Dec 2018 21:57:08 (GMT-5)</span>
</p>
<p>
Updated by <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_user.php?name=marco" title="Marco von Ballmoos" class="visible">marco</a> on <span class="date-time">24. Feb 2019 17:44:33 (GMT-5)</span>
</p>
</div>
      <div class="text-flow wide">
  <blockquote class="quote abstract "><div>Disclaimer: these are notes I took while reading this book. They include citations I found interesting or enlightening or particularly well-written. In some cases, I&rsquo;ve pointed out which of these applies to which citation; in others, I have not. Any benefit you gain from reading these notes is purely incidental to the purpose they serve of reminding me what I once read. Please see Wikipedia for a summary if I&rsquo;ve failed to provide one sufficient for your purposes. If my notes serve to trigger an interest in this book, then I&rsquo;m happy for you.</div></blockquote><p>This is the second Hap and Leonard novel. This one picks up where the first one left off—with the two heroes down on their luck and back to working in the rose fields, for peanuts. Leonard gets a sort of windfall—his uncle Chester has died and left him with a sizable inheritance as well as his house.</p>
<p>The house is in a rough neighborhood and right next to a crack den. Leonard cannot let that stand, so he takes them on immediately. They&rsquo;re a big problem, but they&rsquo;re not the main problem. The main problem seems to be a case that the police refused to work on, but that Chester and his friend Moon had been working for years. Moon is missing as well.</p>
<p>Hap and Leonard discover this from strange clues that Chester left—and then discover a child&rsquo;s skeleton under the house, wrapped in child pornography. They suspect Chester, of course, but Leonard is adamant that he couldn&rsquo;t have done it.</p>
<p>I won&rsquo;t ruin any more of the story, but it unfolds in a very interesting manner. The reverend and sheriff are involved, as is big ol&rsquo; TJ. Leonard and Hap stay true and stay on the trail to figure it all out in the end. To get a flavor for the style of writing, check out the citations.</p>
<h2>Citations</h2><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;My overall appearance was of someone who had been in a fight and lost.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 8</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;There was some hand-shaking and talking, and most of the crowd came over and spoke to Leonard and said how sorry they were, looked at me out of the corners of their eyes, suspicious because I was white, or maybe because they assumed I was Leonard’s lover. It was bad enough they had a relative or acquaintance who was queer, but shit, looked like he was fucking a white guy.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 10</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>“Is it OK I ask a question?” I said. </p>
<p>“Yes,” she said.</p>
<p>“Are you married?” </p>
<p>“No.”</p>
<p>“Anyone significant in your life right now?”</p>
<p>“Not really.”</p>
<p>“Any possibility of me taking you to dinner?”</p>
<p>“I don’t think so, Mr. Collins.”</p>
<p>“I clean up pretty good.”</p>
<p>“I’m sure you do, but I think not. Thanks for asking.”</p>
<p>On the way down in the elevator, Leonard said, “Hap Collins, Lady Killer.”</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 32</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>“Hey, I’m offering you a job. I didn’t call up for insults.”</p>
<p>“Maybe we can jump that shit pay a little. Another fifty cents an hour you’d almost be in line with minimum wage.”</p>
<p>“Don’t start, Hap. You know the pay. I pay cash, too. You save on income tax that way.”</p>
<p>“You save on income tax, Lacy. Wages like that, I don’t save dick. I’d rather make enough so I had to pay some taxes.”</p>
<p>“Yeah, well …” And he went on to tell me about his old mother in a Kansas nursing home. How he had to send her money every month. I figured he probably shot his mother years ago, buried her under a rosebush to save on fertilizer.</p>
<p>“Couldn’t your old mother whore a little?” I said. “You know, she’s set up. Got a room and a bed and all. If she can spread her legs, she can pay her way.”</p>
<p>“Hap, you bastard. Don’t start fucking with me, or you can forget the job.”</p>
<p>“My heart just missed a beat.”</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 38</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Not everyone has had the chance to have pride, Captain Know-It-All. You don’t come with it built in. Like new cars, there are some options got to be installed.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 100</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;I shut my mouth and brooded. There was some truth in what Leonard said, but ultimately, in my mind, there’s no one more obnoxious and self-righteous than the self-made man. And no one more admirable.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 101</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;Your uncle was a witty man, and quick with a quip. He seemed to have a special hatred for religion.” </p>
<p>&ldquo;“Hypocrisy is what bothered him,” Leonard said. “Not religion.”&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 108</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;They swept down black and vicious and brought with them Zorro slashes of lightning and lug bolts of rain.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 113</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;In the car, Leonard said, “I know it’s an ugly thing to say, him being ignorant as a post and all, but maybe, luck’s with the world, that shiftless sonofabitch will die in his sleep tonight. He ain’t doing nothing but makin’ turds.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 134</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>The big black guy who’d been watching strolled over to our table. Well, not exactly strolled. He listed a little. He’d had just the right amount of beer. I sized him up, looking for striking zones just in case it wasn’t his intention to discuss politics or summer fashion.</p>
<p>He stopped at our table, said to Leonard, “What the fuck you doin’ in here with this honkie, brother? You trying to get a job promotion? This ain’t no honkie place.”</p>
<p>Leonard leaned over the table, said, “He’s talking about you.”</p>
<p>“Yeah?” I said.</p>
<p>“Yeah,” Leonard said. “You see, honkie is a very derogatory black term for whites,” Leonard said to me. “You see, stuff like peckerwood, ofay, and honkie, it’s very insulting. It’s like whites calling us nigger or coon or jungle bunny”</p>
<p>“No shit?” I said. The big black guy glared at me, said, “You ain’t never heard honkie before, motherfucker?”</p>
<p>“He’s sheltered,” Leonard said. Then to me: “Motherfucker, Hap, is a common term meaning you fuck your mother. Even if you don’t fuck your mother, folks say it anyway if they’re mad at you or want to make you mad. It’s designed to be derogatory.”</p>
<p>“I see,” I said.</p>
<p>“You cocksuckers best quit fuckin’ with me!” the big black guy said. </p>
<p>“Cocksucker,” Leonard said to me, “is a common term—”</p>
<p>“Cut it out, you motherfuckers!”</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 148</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;He grinned slowly, and when he grinned, damned if he didn’t have that confident air Leonard’s got, like he’s immortal and knows it. MeMaw was right. They did favor.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 207</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Another bad thing about a holding cell is you don’t exactly meet a great crowd of people. A lot of them are criminals.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 226</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>“I’m sure the owner of the dwelling, Mr. Otis—”</p>
<p>“Some fat cat honkie, I reckon,” Leonard said.</p>
<p>“One of the fattest,” Florida said. “Mr. Otis, who I know is an upstanding citizen, and a friend of the police chief, would be upset to discover the house he’s renting out is being used to sell drugs.”</p>
<p>“Naw,” Charlie said. “Old fart gets a slice of the action.”</p>
<p>“We don’t know that,” Hanson said.</p>
<p>“We can’t prove it,” Charlie said. “Ain’t the same thing.”</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 231</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The only light in the gym was the sunlight that came through high shutter windows, and it was bright to the center of the gym, but there its reach played out and the shadow took over, grew darker toward the far wall.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 255</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The Reverend pulled on a pair of red gloves, and he and Hiram moved toward the center of the gym, and the line of light and shadow split them down the middle, putting one side of their body in the light, the other in the dark, but then they began to move, to bob and weave, to shuffle and dance, and they were one moment in brightness, the next in shadow.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 255</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>“You got to understand, Hap. I didn’t start any of this.”</p>
<p>“I don’t need to understand anything. All I understand is you and Fitz and T.J., every year, killed a young boy, cut him up and buried him under that house. That’s all I need to understand. The why of it doesn’t mean a thing to me.”</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 299</div></div>      </div>
      </div>
        <div class="footer">
    <div class="footer-data"><div class="footer-links"><ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/contact.php" title="">Contact</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/support.php" title="">Support</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/privacy.php" title="">Privacy</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/rights.php" title="">Rights</a></li></ul></div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="copyright">Copyright (c) 1999-2026 earthli.com. All Rights Reserved.</div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="versions">Powered by <ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore/app_news.php">earthli News 3.7</a></li><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore" title="">earthli WebCore&trade; 3.7</a></li></ul></div></div>    </div>
      </div>
  </div>  </body>
</html>
]]>
  </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
      <title type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[Midnight at the Pera Palace: The Birth of Modern Istanbul by Charles King (2014) (read in 2018)]]>
  </title>
    <id>https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3601</id>
    <link href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3601"/>
    <updated>2018-12-27T20:50:26+01:00</updated>
    <author>
        <name type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[Marco von Ballmoos]]>
  </name>
      <uri>https://earthli.com/users/marco</uri>
    </author>
      <summary type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<blockquote class="quote abstract "><div>Disclaimer: these are notes I took while reading this book. They include citations I found interesting or enlightening or particularly well-written. In some cases, I&rsquo;ve pointed out which of these applies to which citation; in others, I have not. Any benefit you gain from reading these notes is... [<a class="complete-text-link" href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3601">More</a>]</div></blockquote>]]>
  </summary>
      <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<html lang="en">
  <head>
    <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/themes/ice.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/fonts/raleway.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/core/medium.css">
  </head>
  <body>
<div class="style-controls">  <div class="page">
    <div class="page-body">
<div class="info-box-top">
<p>
Published by <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_user.php?name=marco" title="Marco von Ballmoos" class="visible">marco</a> on <span class="date-time">27. Dec 2018 20:50:26 (GMT-5)</span>
</p>
<p>
Updated by <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_user.php?name=marco" title="Marco von Ballmoos" class="visible">marco</a> on <span class="date-time">29. Dec 2018 12:42:49 (GMT-5)</span>
</p>
</div>
      <div class="text-flow wide">
  <blockquote class="quote abstract "><div>Disclaimer: these are notes I took while reading this book. They include citations I found interesting or enlightening or particularly well-written. In some cases, I&rsquo;ve pointed out which of these applies to which citation; in others, I have not. Any benefit you gain from reading these notes is purely incidental to the purpose they serve of reminding me what I once read. Please see Wikipedia for a summary if I&rsquo;ve failed to provide one sufficient for your purposes. If my notes serve to trigger an interest in this book, then I&rsquo;m happy for you.</div></blockquote><p>This book is a history of Istanbul from its very earliest days—before it was even Constantinople—up until the end of World War II. It&rsquo;s a tremendous work, using the Pera Palace (a famous and much-frequented hotel) as a focal point in modern times.</p>
<p>It is fascinating to learn about the mix of cultures that led to Istanbul—and, indeed, to Turkey. The Greeks and Jews were an intrinsic part, right up until the end. There were purges and seizing of family wealth, with strong parallels to the overthrow of the Tsars in Russia. The ties went deeper after the revolution, when Trotzky lived there for years, in exile.</p>
<p>It&rsquo;s the crossroads of Europe and Asia, providing rail access to Russia, hosting one of the terminuses of the Orient Express. The history covers the rise of Ataturk as well a slew of activists and contributors to Turkey&rsquo;s rich, political history. As a neutral country during WWII, it hosted secret-service agencies from all countries, offering a sort of hallowed ground where they could meet, if need be.</p>
<p>Turkey joined WWII even later than the U.S. and had a complicated relationship to the Axis and Allied nations, especially as related to getting European refugees of all kinds out of Axis-occupied nations. Their neutrality looked like appeasement. The bureaucracy was maddening. Whereas tens of thousands of people made it through to Israel and the Middle East, just as many were rejected and sent back where they&rsquo;d come from, into the teeth of the Nazi machine.</p>
<p>After that, Ararat&rsquo;s secularist state was increasingly muslimized, with Jews and other denominations (e.g. Greek Orthodox) being increasingly culled. It&rsquo;s a difficult history, though nothing to be especially ashamed of, as compared to other, actually colonial, fascist or imperial nations. It&rsquo;s hard to summarize the whole book, so I leave you with the following, from near the end (I&rsquo;ve included a longer version of the citation below):</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;National history asks that we take the impossibly large variety of human experience, stacked up like a deck of playing cards, and pull out only the national one—the rare moments in time when people raise a flag and misremember a collective past—as the most worthy of our attention.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 374</div></div><h2>Citations</h2><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The antidote to hüzün was what the Turks called keyif: a sense of joyful abandon, of singing to avoid crying, the willful summoning of mirth as an answer to horror.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 5</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The dynasty of the House of Osman, which had governed an empire&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 87</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The sultan had abandoned Istanbul and the empire. A few days later, the Grand National Assembly named the crown prince, Mehmed’s cousin Abdülmecid, as caliph but without the additional title of sultan. The roles of universal Islamic leader and imperial ruler were now separated for the first time in centuries. The dynasty of the House of Osman, which had governed an empire for more than six hundred years and had commanded Istanbul for four hundred sixty-nine, was no more. The sultan himself had become a refugee.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 87</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The streets were full of people of all nationalities wearing all manner of clothes, often some mixture of military uniforms and civilian attire. The refugees—Russians, Georgians, Azerbaijanis, Ukrainians, and others—had blown into Istanbul carrying remnants of past lives and disappeared nations.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 99</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;There was nothing necessarily dishonest in their dealings, at least at the level of individual transactions, but they rested on a massive transfer of wealth whose origins lay in the republic’s preference for national purity over the old cosmopolitanism of the imperial capital.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 130</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The club’s proprietor was an unlikely impresario. Frederick Bruce Thomas was the son of former Mississippi slaves. He had joined countless other black men from the southern United States who sought jobs and fortunes in Chicago and New York, waiting tables or working as valets. A sense of adventure and a desire to escape the everyday racism of Gilded Age America took him to London, Paris, and then, in 1899, to a place very few African Americans had dreamed of visiting: the Russian Empire. Within a few years, he had taken Russian citizenship, found a Russian wife, and—as Fyodor Fyodorovich Tomas—set himself up as one of the premier maître d’s in Moscow.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 138</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Jazz depends on improvisation, which is why it has been described as not just a musical form but an ethical system. It demands that a player really listen to his comrades, with the bravery to step forward when he has something to say and the self-possession to know when he has said enough. It requires virtuosity but also humility.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 166</div></div><p>Programming as jazz?</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Like many revolutionaries, the Kemalists had started out as reformers, seeking to save the sultanate from invaders and occupiers, until it became clear that the old system was beyond repair. But in most other ways, this was a revolution of an unusual type. The Turks legislated their monarch out of existence without ever marching on a royal palace. They conquered no territory but their own. They embraced the idea of a parliamentary republic but just as quickly enveloped their supreme leader in a cult of personality that exceeded that of the Ottoman sultans.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 181</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Rights, Halide believed, were there for the recognizing. They were not granted or bestowed so much as finally accepted and acknowledged […]&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 216</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Russia and Turkey had been strategic rivals for centuries, and this long history was difficult to overcome, especially in an era in which Soviets and Turks were both beginning to see themselves as contrasting models of modernity for oppressed peoples everywhere—one based on a proletarian revolution, the other based on a national one. In the contest between rival ideals, the Turks preferred the version that allowed them to build a nation of their own, not one that preached the end of nations altogether.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 225</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Nâzım was tried and sentenced to thirty-five years in prison. Unlike his previous sentences, however, this one more or less stuck. He spent the next twelve years incarcerated as a threat to the Turkish state, a rejecter of Kemalism, and a traitorous admirer of the Soviet Union, which had gone from being an early ally of Turkey to a regional rival in the run-up to the Second World War. He was released in 1950 in a general amnesty of political prisoners and only then after a sustained international campaign supported by Pablo Picasso, Jean-Paul Sartre, and other European intellectuals.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 230</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Trotsky had been exiled twice before, to Siberia and the Russian North, during his period as an underground revolutionary in the tsarist era, and he was used to the concept of starting a new life as an émigré. The two earlier periods of exile had given way to triumph: the 1905 Russian revolution that forced the tsar to create a Russian parliament and the October 1917 revolution that elevated the Bolsheviks to power. He had no desire to stay in a country where he could not speak the local language, he told Turkish journalists, and he hoped that soon a visa would come through for Germany, Britain, or France. There, he would be able to continue his political work on behalf of international socialism while also railing against the usurper Stalin.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 236</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;[…] the Byzantines consistently called anyone living outside their capital city “hoi ex Roms,” foreigners from beyond New Rome, that is, Istanbul. They usually referred to their metropolis as simply “the city,” much as New Yorkers speak of Manhattan. That habit probably gave us the modern name, since the Greek eis tn polin—“to the city”—is tantalizingly similar to “Istanbul.” To this day, ethnic Greeks native to Istanbul are referred to in Turkish as something akin to “Romans,” or Rumlar, an echo of the name Byzantines gave themselves.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 274</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Atatürk was very much in the mold of other twentieth-century dictators. He ground down political opposition and held firm to the belief that state planning could realize the true interests of the nation, without ever feeling the need to ask the nation what its interests happened to be. Yet, unlike a Mussolini or a Franco, he knew where to draw the line. He was one of the few supreme leaders of the era to develop a cult of personality that staved off its own inevitable decay.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 292</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;As with all clandestine services, however, the line between neutralizing a real danger and manufacturing one precisely so that it could be neutralized was always somewhat hazy. Intelligence work could be a closed circle. Sometimes the evidence that a threat existed was no more than the fact that some security operative had decided to report that it did. It was a way of thinking about security, politics, and foreign intrigue that was built into the basic structure of the republic and its police apparatus.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 305</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;But X-2 soon set about systematically contacting Americans, many of them working at Robert College, the brother institution to the American College for Girls and a Protestant missionary school that had become one of the country’s best educational centers.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 309</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Americans seemed especially willing to believe that “any attractive girl who shed a few tears and told him how much she hated the Germans was genuinely anti-Nazi.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 311</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The next day, he boarded a plane for Miami. After a week cooling his heels waiting for a US Army transport plane for Turkey, he found a berth. At the end of January, the C-54 took off with a group of young officers bound for India and one middle-aged civilian hitching a ride. After five days en route, via air hops to Puerto Rico, Brazil, Ghana, and Egypt, several days in Jerusalem, and a twenty-eight-hour train ride across the Taurus Mountains and half of Anatolia, Hirschmann at last arrived in Ankara on Valentine’s Day, 1944.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 327</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The reason is that the largest tax assessments were handed out to Greeks, Armenians, and Jews. “This law is also a law of revolution,” said Prime Minister Saracolu at the time. “We will in this way eliminate the foreigners who control our market and give the Turkish market to the Turks.” Families and minority businesses found it impossible to meet the requirements. According to a secret report by the OSS, the tax assessments for Armenian property owners amounted to 232 percent of their property’s real value, 179 percent for Jews, and 156 percent for Greeks, while Muslims were assessed at just under 5 percent.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 333</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;In the summer of 1938, the Turkish government had officially barred the door to Jews coming from countries with antisemitic laws. Ankara may have believed that these people, even though the neediest, were also the most likely to stay in Turkey.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 338</div></div><p>I&rsquo;m almost speechless.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Modern European history has two dominant modes, the national and the elegiac. Both are, in their way, fictions. National history asks that we take the impossibly large variety of human experience, stacked up like a deck of playing cards, and pull out only the national one—the rare moments in time when people raise a flag and misremember a collective past—as the most worthy of our attention. The elegiac asks that we end every story by fading to black, leaving off at a point when an old world is lost, with a set of ellipses pointing back toward what once had been.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 374</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;When the sky is bruise-blue and cold, crowds of gulls and pigeons still bounce along the shoreline. Sparkle-headed grackles and magpies strut deliberately beneath the dormant oleander. Snow-covered Judas trees share the coastal hills with evergreen cypresses. On blustery mornings, the Sea of Marmara is a dull sapphire, with leaden domes and gilded spires muted on the shore, everything radiating a cool blue light once the early mist burns away.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 376</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Talât, a Muslim villager, broke and unmarried and just arrived that day from Giresun, his hometown on the Black Sea, has come up from the docklands, perhaps looking for work. In an apartment nearby, a Muslim musician, the son of Balkan immigrants, is practicing his contrabass. And around the corner, on the street named for the little vine-covered mosque, someone the neighbors call Shalom, Mordecai’s son, has come out for an evening walk.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 378</div></div>      </div>
      </div>
        <div class="footer">
    <div class="footer-data"><div class="footer-links"><ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/contact.php" title="">Contact</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/support.php" title="">Support</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/privacy.php" title="">Privacy</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/rights.php" title="">Rights</a></li></ul></div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="copyright">Copyright (c) 1999-2026 earthli.com. All Rights Reserved.</div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="versions">Powered by <ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore/app_news.php">earthli News 3.7</a></li><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore" title="">earthli WebCore&trade; 3.7</a></li></ul></div></div>    </div>
      </div>
  </div>  </body>
</html>
]]>
  </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
      <title type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[The Jungle Book by Rudyard Kipling (1894) (read in 2018)]]>
  </title>
    <id>https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3612</id>
    <link href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3612"/>
    <updated>2018-12-27T11:10:50+01:00</updated>
    <author>
        <name type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[Marco von Ballmoos]]>
  </name>
      <uri>https://earthli.com/users/marco</uri>
    </author>
      <summary type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<blockquote class="quote abstract "><div>Disclaimer: these are notes I took while reading this book. They include citations I found interesting or enlightening or particularly well-written. In some cases, I&rsquo;ve pointed out which of these applies to which citation; in others, I have not. Any benefit you gain from reading these notes is... [<a class="complete-text-link" href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3612">More</a>]</div></blockquote>]]>
  </summary>
      <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<html lang="en">
  <head>
    <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/themes/ice.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/fonts/raleway.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/core/medium.css">
  </head>
  <body>
<div class="style-controls">  <div class="page">
    <div class="page-body">
<div class="info-box-top">
<p>
Published by <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_user.php?name=marco" title="Marco von Ballmoos" class="visible">marco</a> on <span class="date-time">27. Dec 2018 11:10:50 (GMT-5)</span>
</p>
</div>
      <div class="text-flow wide">
  <blockquote class="quote abstract "><div>Disclaimer: these are notes I took while reading this book. They include citations I found interesting or enlightening or particularly well-written. In some cases, I&rsquo;ve pointed out which of these applies to which citation; in others, I have not. Any benefit you gain from reading these notes is purely incidental to the purpose they serve of reminding me what I once read. Please see Wikipedia for a summary if I&rsquo;ve failed to provide one sufficient for your purposes. If my notes serve to trigger an interest in this book, then I&rsquo;m happy for you.</div></blockquote><p>I was surprised to learn that the movie is based only on the first three of seven stories in this book. The first three are of a Mowgli who is considerably more adult than the films lead one to believe. He is a child at the very beginning, when he is, indeed, adopted by wolves. However, the story very quickly picks up from a point where he is more-or-less a man and is more than a match for most other creatures of the jungle or civilization.</p>
<p>The first story ends with Mowgli driving off Shere Khan (the tiger) with the &ldquo;red flower&rdquo;: fire. Akela (the lead wolf) stays in control of the pack. In the second part, he is kidnapped by the monkeys (the &ldquo;Bandar-log&rdquo;) and is rescued by Kaa (python), Baloo (bear) and Bagheera (black panther). The movie was relatively faithful here, as well, taking liberties only in inventing &ldquo;King Louie&rdquo;, king of the orangutans. The monkeys are not individualized and are not treated as co-equal jungle denizens by the other animals.</p>
<p>In the third part, Mowgli goes to live in the village with men. Shere Kahn continues to cause trouble and, with his acolytes, takes over the wolf pack. Mowgli is herding cows for the village. He hears from his animal friends that Shere Kahn is nearby and, that he just fed and will be slow and sleepy. Mowgli hatches a plan to drive his cattle through the canyon where Shere Kahn sleeps, trapping him and then trampling him. Akela and Gray brother wolf are instrumental in Shere Kahn&rsquo;s demise. Despite his advanced age, Akela is restored as leader of the pack. Mowgli returns to the jungle,</p>
<p>The fourth story is of Kotick, a white-furred seal, son of the greatest fighter of all the seals. His father fights each year for a place for his family on the shores of an island shared with men. Men sneak into the rear lines and take many seals each year. Kotick does not understand why they return to that island. His father is powerful and is not in danger (other than the grievous wounds he suffers each year in defending his place). Kotick instead travels the world, growing powerful. Finally, he swims with seacows to discover a secluded cove/island, protected from the eyes of man. There is plenty of room for all—he returns to the original island to bring his tribe with him. They refuse, so he fights them <em>all</em>. His savagery and power awe everyone, including his father. Convinced, many of them go with him and discover that he was right all along. Men no longer plunder their tribe.</p>
<p>The fifth story is the also-famous one of Rikki-Tikki-Tavi, the mongoose who defended a family from cobras. The cobra couple Nag and Nagina plot to kill members of the family, but Rikki jumps in and kills Nag. Furious, Nagina swears revenge, but Rikki goes on the offensive, attacking her nest and destroying all but one egg. She takes the last egg back her nest, but Rikki plunges after her—although very few mongooses ever return from a cobra nest. The other animals in the yard wait with bated breath, until Rikki emerges victorious, bruised but not beaten. Nag and Nagina are dead and no eggs have survived.</p>
<p>The sixth story is of Toomai, the son of a mahout, master of the elephant Kala Nag. They are tasked with catching wild elephants. Toomai helps but is reprimanded for being in the elephant enclosure. The boss tells him he may only return once he has &ldquo;seen elephants dance&rdquo;. He thinks that he has banished the boy for good. Kala Nag takes the boy along on the next giant meeting of wild and domesticated elephants. On the night of the dance, they all break their chains and trample acres of forest. The boss cannot deny that they&rsquo;d danced and that Toomai had seen it and welcomes him as a mahout.</p>
<p>The final story follows the conversations of the various animals employed by the British on a battle field in Afghanistan. The mules, camels, horses, bullocks and elephants detail their fears and tasks and how and why they serve. The animals that already serve the queen are there to convince the Afghan animals that they should obey, as well. I suppose there&rsquo;s a metaphor in there somewhere.</p>
<h2>Citations</h2><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;"The pity of the Monkey People!&rdquo; Baloo snorted. &ldquo;The stillness of the mountain stream! The cool of the summer sun!&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 28</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Little Toomai turned, rustling in the fodder, and watched the curve of his big back against half the stars in heaven, and while he watched he heard, so far away that it sounded no more than a pinhole of noise pricked through the stillness, the &ldquo;hoot-toot&rdquo; of a wild elephant.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 121</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;(&ldquo;Two Tails&rdquo; is camp slang for the elephant.)&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 139</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;"You could put a whole regiment of Dicks on my back without making me feel any better. I know just enough to be uncomfortable, and not enough to go on in spite of it.&ldquo;&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 142</div></div>      </div>
      </div>
        <div class="footer">
    <div class="footer-data"><div class="footer-links"><ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/contact.php" title="">Contact</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/support.php" title="">Support</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/privacy.php" title="">Privacy</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/rights.php" title="">Rights</a></li></ul></div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="copyright">Copyright (c) 1999-2026 earthli.com. All Rights Reserved.</div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="versions">Powered by <ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore/app_news.php">earthli News 3.7</a></li><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore" title="">earthli WebCore&trade; 3.7</a></li></ul></div></div>    </div>
      </div>
  </div>  </body>
</html>
]]>
  </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
      <title type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[Bad Chili (a Hap and Leonard Novel) by Joe R. Lansdale (1997) (read in 2018)]]>
  </title>
    <id>https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3611</id>
    <link href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3611"/>
    <updated>2018-12-27T10:35:37+01:00</updated>
    <author>
        <name type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[Marco von Ballmoos]]>
  </name>
      <uri>https://earthli.com/users/marco</uri>
    </author>
      <summary type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<blockquote class="quote abstract "><div>Disclaimer: these are notes I took while reading this book. They include citations I found interesting or enlightening or particularly well-written. In some cases, I&rsquo;ve pointed out which of these applies to which citation; in others, I have not. Any benefit you gain from reading these notes is... [<a class="complete-text-link" href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3611">More</a>]</div></blockquote>]]>
  </summary>
      <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<html lang="en">
  <head>
    <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/themes/ice.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/fonts/raleway.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/core/medium.css">
  </head>
  <body>
<div class="style-controls">  <div class="page">
    <div class="page-body">
<div class="info-box-top">
<p>
Published by <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_user.php?name=marco" title="Marco von Ballmoos" class="visible">marco</a> on <span class="date-time">27. Dec 2018 10:35:37 (GMT-5)</span>
</p>
</div>
      <div class="text-flow wide">
  <blockquote class="quote abstract "><div>Disclaimer: these are notes I took while reading this book. They include citations I found interesting or enlightening or particularly well-written. In some cases, I&rsquo;ve pointed out which of these applies to which citation; in others, I have not. Any benefit you gain from reading these notes is purely incidental to the purpose they serve of reminding me what I once read. Please see Wikipedia for a summary if I&rsquo;ve failed to provide one sufficient for your purposes. If my notes serve to trigger an interest in this book, then I&rsquo;m happy for you.</div></blockquote><p>Hap starts off the book with rabies. Leonard starts off the book as a suspect in the murder of a biker who was fooling around with Raul. Hap&rsquo;s rabies leads him to meet Brett Sawyer, a dirty night nurse with whom he begins a torrid affair. Leonard and Hap investigate to clear Leonard&rsquo;s name, all the while staying out of the reach of the law—except for Charlie, who&rsquo;s almost certain that Leonard didn&rsquo;t do it.</p>
<p>Things get more complicated as the biker turns out to have been not only an undercover cop, but also a <em>dirty</em> (different meaning than for Brett) undercover cop. In the mix is a local Chili King, who&rsquo;s got a lot of markets cornered and is mixed up in some very sordid businesses. There&rsquo;s also the matter of some videotapes that show gay guys getting thrashed for being gay. They team up with Jim-Bob Luke—a private investigator with a lot of luck and very loose ethics—to finally crack the case.</p>
<h2>Citations</h2><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>“You seem happy enough,” I said.</p>
<p>“It’s smile or die, darlin’.”</p>
<p>“Then why do you do this?”</p>
<p>“’Cause I’m divorced and the landlord won’t fuck me for the rent.”</p>
<p>I laughed and she laughed.</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 27</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>Kevin said, “What you gonna do, fuckhead?”</p>
<p>“I can either sit you down and have a nice talk, or punch your lights out. Since I figure you’ll be a boring conversationalist, I like the second idea.”</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 143</div></div><p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><br>
&nbsp;</p>
      </div>
      </div>
        <div class="footer">
    <div class="footer-data"><div class="footer-links"><ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/contact.php" title="">Contact</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/support.php" title="">Support</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/privacy.php" title="">Privacy</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/rights.php" title="">Rights</a></li></ul></div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="copyright">Copyright (c) 1999-2026 earthli.com. All Rights Reserved.</div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="versions">Powered by <ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore/app_news.php">earthli News 3.7</a></li><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore" title="">earthli WebCore&trade; 3.7</a></li></ul></div></div>    </div>
      </div>
  </div>  </body>
</html>
]]>
  </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
      <title type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[Star Maker by Olaf Stapledon (1937) (read in 2018)]]>
  </title>
    <id>https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3613</id>
    <link href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3613"/>
    <updated>2018-12-27T10:21:34+01:00</updated>
    <author>
        <name type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[Marco von Ballmoos]]>
  </name>
      <uri>https://earthli.com/users/marco</uri>
    </author>
      <summary type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<blockquote class="quote abstract "><div>Disclaimer: these are notes I took while reading this book. They include citations I found interesting or enlightening or particularly well-written. In some cases, I&rsquo;ve pointed out which of these applies to which citation; in others, I have not. Any benefit you gain from reading these notes is... [<a class="complete-text-link" href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3613">More</a>]</div></blockquote>]]>
  </summary>
      <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<html lang="en">
  <head>
    <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/themes/ice.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/fonts/raleway.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/core/medium.css">
  </head>
  <body>
<div class="style-controls">  <div class="page">
    <div class="page-body">
<div class="info-box-top">
<p>
Published by <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_user.php?name=marco" title="Marco von Ballmoos" class="visible">marco</a> on <span class="date-time">27. Dec 2018 10:21:34 (GMT-5)</span>
</p>
<p>
Updated by <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_user.php?name=marco" title="Marco von Ballmoos" class="visible">marco</a> on <span class="date-time">27. Dec 2018 20:13:35 (GMT-5)</span>
</p>
</div>
      <div class="text-flow wide">
  <blockquote class="quote abstract "><div>Disclaimer: these are notes I took while reading this book. They include citations I found interesting or enlightening or particularly well-written. In some cases, I&rsquo;ve pointed out which of these applies to which citation; in others, I have not. Any benefit you gain from reading these notes is purely incidental to the purpose they serve of reminding me what I once read. Please see Wikipedia for a summary if I&rsquo;ve failed to provide one sufficient for your purposes. If my notes serve to trigger an interest in this book, then I&rsquo;m happy for you.</div></blockquote><p>This book is the description of an astral journey. The author describes leaving his home to take a walk to a local hilltop and then going much, much further. He travels the remaining distance—in all four dimensions—in his mind. He starts off in the local solar system, but quickly ranges to other stars, flitting to and fro, without regard for the speed of light. At first, he talks of blue and red shifts, but he soon realizes he can travel free of physical constraint by attuning himself to an &ldquo;affinity&rdquo; for worlds that have intelligent life on them.</p>
<p>This all sounds absolutely bizarre, but the book was written in 1937, in the early Einstein era. It&rsquo;s a remarkably sophisticated treatise and holds up reasonably well, even today. He posits the fast mode of travel in order to be able to describe what he experienced.</p>
<p>He is also capable of &ldquo;landing&rdquo; on planets and merging with the consciousness of individuals there. He spends a long time on a planet of quasi-human beings who experience the world more through scent than through visual apprehension. At the end of his sojourn, his host Bvalltu leaves with him and, together, they range across star systems.</p>
<p>The overarching theme is communal life and intelligence. He talks of ever-higher levels of intelligence, straining to a perfection, to being worthy of returning to the so-called Star Maker. Clan intelligences form nation intelligences, which form world intelligences, then star-system and, finally, galactic intelligences.</p>
<p>At this point, the story picks up temporal speed and they talk of visiting other galaxies. Each of these galaxies is in a different level of development toward a hive mind. Some of their powers are awesome: they can move planets and stars. There is talk of decay, where some civilizations fail. At one point, all of the stars begin exploding—at which point it is discovered that they, too, are intelligent. Their society is folded into the galactic ones. And so on, and so forth.</p>
<p>In the end, the author is part of the cosmic mind, the sum total of all galactic intelligences that sees through to the Star Maker and looks on his many works, of which this universe is but one. It is a sort-of ecclesiastic re-telling of the Big Bang, with some of the Star Maker&rsquo;s creations collapsing back and others dispersing until a heat death.</p>
<p>The thought experiment folds back in on itself as the author subsides back into his body and returns to his wife and home, that which he now realizes is the most important, the seed of all that is to follow.</p>
<p>As noted in <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Star_Maker">Wikipedia</a>, prominent contemporaries like Jorge Luis Borges, H.G. Wells, Virginia Woolf, Brian Aldiss, Doris Lessing (recent Nobel Prize winner), Arthur C. Clarke and Stanislaw Lem held this book and its author in high esteem. Even Freeman Dyson credited his &ldquo;Dyson Spheres&rdquo; to Stapledon, since he&rsquo;d already envisioned them in this book.</p>
<h2>Citations</h2><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;And in particular, this partnership of ours, this seemingly so well-based fulcrum for activity in the world, was it after all nothing but a little eddy of complacent and ingrown domesticity, ineffectively whirling on the surface of the great flux, having in itself no depth of being, and no significance?&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 45-47</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Overhead, obscurity unveiled a star. One tremulous arrow of light, projected how many thousands of years ago, now stung my nerves with vision, and my heart with fear.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 56-57</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;But now irrationally I was seized with a strange worship, not, surely of the star, that mere furnace which mere distance falsely sanctified,&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 58-59</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;a long-married couple we fitted rather neatly, like two close trees whose trunks have grown upwards together as a single shaft, mutually distorting, but mutually supporting.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 69-70</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;perceived that I was on a little round grain of rock and metal, filmed with water and with air, whirling in sunlight and darkness. And on the skin of that little grain all the swarms of men, generation by generation, had lived in labor and blindness, with intermittent joy and intermittent lucidity of spirit. And all their history, with its folk-wanderings, its empires, its philosophies, its proud sciences, its social revolutions, its increasing hunger for community, was but a flicker in one day of the lives of stars.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 88-91</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Evidently I was traveling not only upwards but eastwards, and swinging round into the day. Soon the sun leapt into view, devouring the huge crescent of dawn with its brilliance.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 137-138</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;There below me lay huge industrial regions, blackening the air with smoke. Yet all this thronging life and humanly momentous enterprise had made no mark whatever on the features of the planet. From this high look-out the Earth would have appeared no different before the dawn of man. No visiting angel, or explorer from another planet, could have guessed that this bland orb teemed with vermin, with world-mastering, self-torturing, incipiently angelic beasts.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 152-155</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;am dismayed at the contrast between the spiritual treasure which I aspired to hand over to my fellow men and the paucity of my actual tribute. This failure was perhaps due to the fact that, though I did indeed accept the challenge of the adventure, I accepted it only with secret reservations. Fear and the longing for comfort, I now recognize, dimmed the brightness of my will. My resolution, so boldly formed, proved after all frail.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 219-222</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Governments soon discovered that the new invention gave them a cheap and effective kind of power over their subjects. Slum-conditions could be tolerated if there was an unfailing supply of illusory luxury. Reforms distasteful to the authorities could be shelved if they could be represented as inimical to the national radio-system. Strikes and riots could often be broken by the mere threat to close down the broadcasting studios, or alternatively by flooding the ether at a critical moment with some saccharine novelty.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 534-538</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Children, if future generations were required, would be produced ectogenetically. The World Director of Broadcasting would be requested to submit psychological and physiological specifications of the ideal “listening breed.” Infants produced in accordance with this pattern would then be educated by special radio programs to prepare them for adult radio life. They would never leave their cots, save to pass by stages to the full-sized beds of maturity. At the latter end of life, if medical science did not succeed in circumventing senility and death, the individual would at least be able to secure a painless end by pressing an appropriate button.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 558-563</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Of course for the most part people went about their affairs with the same absorbed and self-satisfied interest as on my own planet. They were far too busy making a living, marrying, rearing families, trying to get the better of one another, to spare time for conscious doubt about the aim of life.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 657-659</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Men would become on the whole less sincere, less self-searching, less sensitive to the needs of others, in fact less capable of community. Social machinery, which had worked well so long as citizens attained a certain level of humanity, would be dislocated by injustice and corruption. Tyrants and tyrannical oligarchies would set about destroying liberty. Hate-mad submerged classes would give them good excuse. Little by little, though the material benefits of civilization might smolder on for centuries, the flame of the spirit would die down into a mere flicker in a few isolated individuals.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 700-703</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Bvalltu, on the other hand, suspected that deterioration was due to some factor in human nature itself. He was inclined to believe that it was a consequence of civilization, that in changing the whole environment of the human species, seemingly for the better, science had unwittingly brought about a state of affairs hostile to spiritual vigor. He did not pretend to know whether the disaster was caused by the increase of artificial food, or the increased nervous strain of modern conditions, or interference with natural selection, or the softer upbringing of children, or to some other cause.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 741-745</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;In Bvalltu’s view man had climbed approximately to the same height time after time, only to be undone by some hidden consequence of his own achievement.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 754-755</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;It was known to scientists that, owing to the weak gravitational hold of their world, the atmosphere, already scant, was steadily deceasing. Sooner or later humanity would have to face the problem of stopping this constant leakage of precious oxygen. Hitherto life had successfully adapted itself to the progressive rarefaction of atmosphere, but the human physique had already reached the limit of adaptability in this respect. If the loss were not soon checked, the race would inevitably decline. The only hope was that some means to deal with the atmospheric problem would be discovered before the onset of the next age of barbarism.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 757-761</div></div><p>It sounds very much like he&rsquo;s talking about global warming in 1937.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Not so to Bvalitu. “Even if the powers destroy us,” he said, “who are we, to condemn them? As well might a fleeting word judge the speaker that forms it. Perhaps they use us for their own hihg ends, use our strength and our weakness, our joy and our pain, in some theme inconceivable to us, and excellent.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 772-774</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;“If he saved all the worlds, but tormented just one man, would you forgive him? Or if he was a little harsh only to one stupid child? What has our pain to do with it, or our failure? Star Maker! It is a good word, though we can have no notion&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 777-779</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Bvalitu was silent in his mind for a moment. Then he looked up, searching among the smoke-clouds for a daytime star. And then he said to me in his mind, “If he saved all the worlds, but tormented just one man, would you forgive him? Or if he was a little harsh only to one stupid child? What has our pain to do with it, or our failure? Star Maker! It is a good word, though we can have no notion of its meaning. Oh, Star Maker, even if you destroy me, I must praise you. Even if you torture my dearest. Even if you torment and waste all your lovely worlds, the little figments of your imagination, yet I must praise you. For if you do so, it must be right. In me it would be wrong, but in you it must be right.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 776-781</div></div><p>The sentiment of being <span class="quote-inline">&ldquo;harsh only to one stupid child&rdquo;</span> was developed further in Ursula K. LeGuin&rsquo;s short story, <em>Those Who Walk Away from Omelas</em>.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;What was the significance of this physical immensity and complexity? By itself, plainly, it constituted nothing but sheer futility and desolation. But with awe and hope we told ourselves that it promised an even greater complexity and subtlety and diversity of the psychical. This alone could justify it. But this formidable promise, though inspiring, was also terrifying. Like a nestling that peers over the nest’s rim for the first time, and then shrinks back from the great world into its tiny home, we had emerged beyond the confines of that little nest of stars which for so long, but falsely, men called “the universe.” And now we sank back to bury ourselves once more in the genial precincts of our native galaxy.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 881-887</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Only a few here and there, now and then, were solaced, goaded, or tortured by moments of true wakefulness. Still fewer attained a clear and constant vision, even of some partial aspect of truth; and their half-truths they nearly always took to be absolute. Propagating their little partial truths, they bewildered and misdirected their fellow mortals as much as they helped them.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 984-987</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;In size these quasi-human types were seldom larger than our largest gorillas, seldom much smaller than monkeys; but we could not estimate their size with any accuracy, as we had no familiar standards of measurements.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 1033-1035</div></div><p>This was an interesting point: as a non-corporeal mind, he would have literally no idea of the dimensions of objects that he observed, since he had nothing against which to measure.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;He might in fact be a critical, self-respecting and other-respecting person. But in all matters connected with the super-tribes, whether national or economic, he behaved in a very different manner. All ideas coming to him with the sanction of nation or class would be accepted uncritically and with fervor by himself and all his fellows. As soon as he encountered one of the symbols or slogans of his super-tribe he ceased to be a human personality and became a sort of de-cerebrate animal, capable only of stereotyped reactions. In extreme cases his mind was absolutely closed to influences opposed to the suggestion of the super-tribe. Criticism was either met with blind rage or actually not heard at all. Persons who in the intimate community of their small native tribe were capable of great mutual insight and sympathy might suddenly, in response to tribal symbols, be transformed into vessels of crazy intolerance and hate directed against national or class enemies.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 1115-1122</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;In several other worlds of this type we saw the struggle for the more awakened mentality definitely fail. Vindictive and superstitious herd-cults exterminated the best minds of the race, and drugged the rest with customs and principles so damaging that the vital sources of sensitivity and adaptability on which all mental progress depends were destroyed forever.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 1133-1136</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;And only a few out of the great host of worlds could win through even to the social peace and fullness toward which all were groping. In the more lowly worlds, moreover, few were the individuals who won any satisfaction of life even within the narrow bounds of their own imperfect nature. No doubt one or two, here and there, in almost every world, found not merely happiness but the joy that passes all understanding.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 1300-1302</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The ichthyoids had not yet succumbed biologically to their inferior position, but psychologically they were already showing signs of deep mental decay. A profound disheartenment and lassitude attacked them, like that which so often undermines our primitive races when they find themselves struggling in the flood of European civilization.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 1453-1456</div></div><p>Despite the high-flying thought experiment in this book, it&rsquo;s still so difficult for the author to escape the unconscious prejudices of his time.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The pacific races had the courage to disarm. In the most spectacular and unmistakable manner they destroyed their weapons and their munition factories. They took care, too, that these events should be witnessed by enemy-swarms that had been taken prisoner. These captives they then freed, bidding them report their experiences to the enemy. In reply the enemy invaded the nearest of the disarmed countries and set about ruthlessly imposing the military culture upon it, by means of propaganda and persecution. But in spite of mass executions and mass torture, the upshot was not what was expected. For though the tyrant races were not appreciably more developed in sociality than Homo sapiens, the victims were far superior. Repression only strengthened the will for passive resistance. Little by little the tyranny began to waver. Then suddenly it collapsed. The invaders withdrew, taking with them the infection of pacifism. In a surprisingly short time that world became a federation, whose members were distinct species.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 1636-1643</div></div><p>This is the purest of wishful thinking. I can&rsquo;t imagine this working with people.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The climax came when it was found possible to do away with the day-time sleep altogether. The products of artificial photosynthesis could be rapidly injected into the living body every morning, so that the plant-man could spend practically the whole day in active work. Very soon the roots of the peoples were being dug up and used as raw material in manufacture. They were no longer needed for their natural purpose.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 1761-1764</div></div><p>Nice metaphor.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;But in this “waking” there seemed to be nothing more mysterious in kind than in those many occasions in normal life when the mind delightedly relates together experiences that have hitherto been insulated from one another, or discovers in confused objects a pattern or a significance hitherto unnoticed.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 1836-1838</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;But in a few worlds the spirit reacted to its desperate plight with a miracle. Or, if the reader prefers, the environment miraculously refashioned the spirit. There occurred a widespread and almost sudden waking into a new lucidity of consciousness and a new integrity of will. To call this change miraculous is only to recognize that it could not have been scientifically predicted even from&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 1903-1906</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;In most cases it was not achieved. “Human nature,” or its equivalent in the many worlds, could not change itself; and the environment could not remake it. But in a few worlds the spirit reacted&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 1902-1903</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Only after a long-drawn agony of economic distress and maniac warfare, haunted by an increasingly clear vision of a happier world, could the second stage of waking be achieved. In most cases it was not achieved. “Human nature,” or its equivalent in the many worlds, could not change itself; and the environment could not remake it. But in a few worlds the spirit reacted to its desperate plight with a miracle. Or, if the reader prefers, the environment miraculously refashioned the spirit. There occurred a widespread and almost sudden waking into a new lucidity of consciousness and a new integrity of will. To call this change miraculous is only to recognize that it could not have been scientifically predicted even from the fullest possible knowledge of “human nature” as manifested in the earlier age. To later generations, however, it appeared as no miracle but as a belated wakening from an almost miraculous stupor into plain sanity.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 1901-1907</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;We observed with incredulity situations in which the “absolute” world-government, faced with some exceptionally momentous and doubtful matter of policy, had made urgent appeals for a formal democratic decision, only to receive from all regions the reply, “We cannot advise. You must decide as your professional experience suggests. We will abide by your decision.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 1945-1947</div></div><p>This is not unusual—what he&rsquo;s describing here is representative democracy.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;And “social service” was apt to be interpreted very broadly. It seemed to permit many lives to be given over wholly to freakish and irresponsible self-expression. The community could well afford a vast amount of such wastage for the sake of the few invaluable jewels of originality which occasionally emerged from it.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 1968-1971</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Of positive eugenical enterprises I need only mention improvements of sensory range and acuity (chiefly in sight and touch), the invention of new senses, improvements in memory, in general intelligence, in temporal discrimination. These races came to distinguish ever more minute periods of duration, and at the same time to extend their temporal grasp so as to apprehend ever longer periods as “now.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 1987-1990</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;In every world that had gained full eugenical power there arose sooner or later a sharp public discussion as to the most suitable length of individual life. All were agreed that life must be prolonged; but, while one party wished to multiply it only three or four times, another insisted that nothing less than a hundred times the normal life-span could afford the race that continuity and depth of experience which all saw to be desirable.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 1994-1997</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Actual interstellar voyaging was first effected by detaching a planet from its natural orbit by a series of well-timed and well-placed rocket impulsions, and thus projecting it into outer space at a speed far greater than the normal planetary and stellar speeds. Something more than this was necessary, since life on a sunless planet would have been impossible. For short interstellar voyages the difficulty was sometimes overcome by the generation of sub-atomic energy from the planet’s own substance; but for longer voyages, lasting for many thousands of years, the only method was to form a small artificial sun, and project it into space as a blazing satellite of the living world.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 2069-2074</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;It must be remembered that a fully awakened world had no need to think in terms of such short periods as a human lifetime. Though its individuals might die, the minded world was in a very important sense immortal.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 2086-2088</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The race might then become travel-mad. Its social organization would be refashioned and directed with Spartan strictness to the new communal undertaking. All its members, hypnotized by the common obsession, would gradually forget the life of intense personal intercourse and of creative mental activity which had hitherto been their chief concern. The whole venture of the spirit, exploring the universe and its own nature with critical intelligence and delicate sensibility, would gradually come to a standstill. The deepest roots of emotion and will, which in the fully sane awakened world were securely within the range of introspection, would become increasingly obscured. Less and less, in such a world, could the unhappy communal mind understand itself. More and more it pursued its phantom goal. Any attempt to explore the galaxy telepathically was now abandoned. The passion of physical exploration assumed the guise of a religion. The communal mind persuaded itself that it must at all costs spread the gospel of its own culture throughout the galaxy. Though culture itself was vanishing, the vague idea of culture was cherished as a justification of world-policy.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 2098-2106</div></div><p>Again, a lovely metaphor.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;For then travel was but the means to cultural and religious empire.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 2110-2110</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;few, however, succeeded in attaining their end, and after voyages lasting for thousands of years were able to reach some neighboring planetary system. The invaders were often in a desperate plight. Generally they had used up most of the material of their little artificial sun. Economy had forced them to reduce their ration of heat and light so far that when at last they discovered a suitable planetary system their native world was almost wholly arctic. On arrival, they would first take up their position in a suitable orbit and, perhaps spend some centuries in recuperating. Then they would explore the neighboring worlds, seek out the most hospitable, and begin to adapt themselves or their descendants to life upon it.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 2128-2133</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Then followed wars such as had never before occurred in our galaxy. Fleets of worlds, natural and artificial, maneuvered among the stars to outwit one another, and destroyed one another with long-range jets of sub-atomic energy. As the tides of battle swept hither and thither through space, whole planetary systems were annihilated. Many a world-spirit found a sudden end. Many a lowly race that had no part in the strife was slaughtered in the celestial warfare that raged around it. Yet so vast is the galaxy that these intermundane wars, terrible as they were, could at first be regarded as rare accidents, mere unfortunate episodes in the triumphant march of civilization.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 2172-2176</div></div><p>The science-fiction series, <em>The Expanse</em> would build on this theme considerably.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Thus, even while the Symbiotics were voyaging among these worlds in rocket vessels and using the mineral resources of neighboring uninhabited planets, the intelligent worlds of pre-utopian rank were left unvisited. Not till these worlds had themselves entered the full Utopian phase and were exploring their neighbor planets were they allowed to discover the truth.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 2269-2271</div></div><p>And this theme was developed further in 2001: A Space Odyssey.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Aeon after aeon, the process would repeat itself under the calm telepathic observation of the Symbiotics, whose existence was never suspected by the primitive creatures under their gaze. So might we ourselves look down into some rock-pool where lowly creatures repeat with naive zest dramas learned by their ancestors aeons ago.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 2278-2280</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Sometimes a comparatively old world, or even a whole ring of worlds, would feel itself outstripped in mental excellence by younger worlds and races, whose structure, physical and biological, embodied increasing skill. Then either the superannuated world would simply continue its life in a sort of backwater of civilization, tolerated, loved, studied by the younger worlds; or it would choose to die and surrender the material of its planet for new ventures.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 2298-2301</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The Sub-Galactics knew that they had power to prevent any further disaster. Yet, to our surprise, our horror and incomprehension, they calmly awaited the third murder. Still more strange, the doomed worlds themselves, though in telepathic communication with the Sub-Galaxy, made no appeal for help. Victims and spectators alike studied the situation with quiet interest, even with a sort of bright exultation not wholly unlike amusement. From our lowlier plane this detachment, this seeming levity, at first appeared less angelic than inhuman.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 2352-2356</div></div><p>This is also an interesting point: that events unfold on different planes of understanding. What looks like madness on one plane is perfectly understandable on another.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The building of the galactic community of worlds lies far beyond the comprehension of the writer of this book. I cannot now remember at all clearly what I experienced of these obscure matters in the state of heightened lucidity which came to me through participation in the communal mind of the explorers. And even in that state I was bewildered by the effort to comprehend the aims of that close-knit community of worlds.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 2441-2444</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The great advance in mental caliber, and the attainment of communal mentality throughout the cosmos, had brought a change in the experience of time. The temporal reach of the mind had been very greatly extended. The awakened worlds experienced an aeon as a mere crowded day. They were aware of time’s passage as a man in a canoe might have cognizance of a river which in its upper reaches is sluggish but subsequently breaks into rapids and becomes swifter and swifter, till, at no great distance ahead, it must plunge in a final cataract down to the sea, namely to the eternal end of life, the extinction of the stars. Comparing the little respite that remained with the great work which they passionately desired to accomplish, namely the full awakening of the cosmical spirit, they saw that at best there was no time to spare, and that, more probably, it was already too late to accomplish the task.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 2509-2515</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;We saw Man on his little Earth blunder through many alternating phases of dullness and lucidity, and again abject dullness. From epoch to epoch his bodily shape changed as a cloud changes. We watched him in his desperate struggle with Martian invaders; and then, after a moment that included further ages ofdarkness and of light, we saw him driven, by dread of the moon’s downfall, away to inhospitable Venus. Later still, after an aeon that was a mere sigh in the lifetime of the cosmos, he fled before the exploding sun to Neptune, there to sink back into mere animality for further aeons again. But then he climbed once more and reached his finest intelligence, only to be burnt up like a moth in a flame by irresistible catastrophe.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 2586-2591</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Plans were therefore made for projecting several stars with their attendant systems of worlds across the vast ocean of space that separated the two floating islets of civilization. The voyage would of course be thousands of times longer than anything hitherto attempted. At its completion many more of the stars in each galaxy would already have ceased to shine, and the end of all life in the cosmos would already be in sight.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 2657-2660</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The star itself, by means of its purchase on the electromagnetic field of the cosmos, apparently wills and executes this ideal course with all the attention and delicacy of response which a motorist exercises in threading his way through traffic on a winding road, or a ballet-dancer in performing the most intricate movements with the greatest economy of effort. Almost certainly, the star’s whole physical behavior is normally experienced as a blissful, an ecstatic, an ever successful pursuit of formal beauty. This the minded worlds were able to discover through their own most formalistic aesthetic experience. In fact it was through this experience that they first made contact with stellar minds. But the actual perception of the aesthetic (or religious?) rightness of the mysterious canon, which the stars so earnestly accepted, remained far beyond the mental range of the minded worlds.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 2761-2767</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The salamandrian races have never been able to gain mastery over their fiery worlds. Many of them succumb, soon or late, either to some natural disaster or to internecine strife or to the self-cleansing activities of their mighty host. Many others survive, but in a relatively harmless state, troubling their stars only with a mild irritation, and a faint shade of insincerity in all their dealings with one another. In the public culture of the stars the salamandrian pest was completely ignored. Each star believed itself to be the only sufferer and the only sinner in the galaxy. One indirect effect the pest did have on stellar thought. It introduced the idea of purity. Each star prized the perfection of the stellar community all the more by reason of its own secret experience of impurity.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 2851-2856</div></div><p>What an imagination!</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Then followed that age of horror which I have already described from the point of view of the Society of Worlds. From the stellar point of view it was no less terrible, for the condition of the stellar society soon became desperate. Gone was the perfection and beatitude of former days. “The City of God” had degenerated into a place of hatred, recrimination and despair. Hosts of the younger stars had become premature and embittered dwarfs, while the elders had mostly grown senile. The dance pattern had fallen into chaos. The old passion for the canons of the dance remained, but the conception of the canons was obscured. Spiritual life had succumbed to the necessity of urgent action. The passion for the progress of insight into the nature of the cosmos also remained, but insight itself was obscured. Moreover, the former naive confidence, common to young and mature alike, the certainty that the cosmos was perfect and that the power behind it was righteous, had given place to blank despair.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 2869-2876</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Although my mind now gathered into itself all the wisdom of all worlds in all ages, and though the life of my cosmical body was itself the life of myriads of infinitely diverse worlds and myriads of infinitely diverse individual creatures, and though the texture of my daily life was one of joyful and creative enterprise, yet all this was as nothing. For around lay the host of the unfulfilled galaxies; and my own flesh was already grievously impoverished by the death of my stars; and the aeons were slipping past with fatal speed. Soon the texture of my cosmical brain must disintegrate. And then inev-itably I must fall away from my prized though imperfect state of lucidity, and descend, through all the stages of the mind’s second childhood, down to the cosmical death.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 2980-2985</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;As time advanced, the internal heat of the encrusted stars was used up, and it became necessary to support civilization by atomic disintegration of the star’s rocky core. Thus in time each stellar world became an increasingly hollow sphere supported by a system of great internal buttresses. One by one the populations, or rather the new and specially adapted descendants of the former populations, retired into the interiors of the burnt-out stars.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 3117-3120</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Together they supported the communal mind, with all its awareness of the whole vivid, intricate past of the cosmos, and its tireless effort to achieve its spiritual goal before increase of entropy should destroy the tissue of civilizations in which it inhered.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 3125-3127</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Suffice it that to each galaxy and to each world was assigned a special creative mental function, and that all assimilated the work of all. At the close of this period I, the communal mind, emerged re-made, as from a chrysalis; and for a brief moment, which was indeed the supreme moment of the cosmos, I faced the Star Maker.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 3136-3138</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Somehow I must tell something of that experience. Inevitably I face the task with a sense of abysmal incompetence. The greatest minds of the human race through all the ages of human history have failed to describe their moments of deepest insight. Then how dare I attempt this task? And yet I must. Even at the risk of well-merited ridicule and contempt and moral censure, I must stammer out what I have seen. If a shipwrecked seaman on his raft is swept helplessly past marvelous coasts and then home again, he cannot hold his peace. The cultivated may turn away in disgust at his rude accent and clumsy diction. The knowing may laugh at his failure to distinguish between fact and illusion. But speak he must.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 3140-3145</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;I saw myself still preserving, though with increasing difficulty, my lucid consciousness; battling against the onset of drowsiness and senility, no longer in the hope of winning through to any more glorious state than that which I had already known, or of laying a less inadequate jewel of worship before the Star Maker, but simply out of sheer hunger for experience, and out of loyalty to the spirit.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 3233-3236</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;It is enough to mention that, in general, each cosmos was more complex, and in a sense more voluminous than the last; for in each the ultimate physical units were smaller in relation to the whole, and more multitudinous. Also, in each the individual conscious creatures were generally more in number, and more diverse in type; and the most awakened in each cosmos reached a more lucid mentality than any creatures in the previous cosmos.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 3387-3390</div></div><p>Here, the author is imagining God in his workshop, suddenly noticing that a creation is looking back at God.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Sometimes a cosmos started as a single lowly organism with an internal, non-organic environment. It then propagated by fission into an increasing host of increasingly small and increasingly individuated and awakened creatures. In some of these universes evolution would continue till the creatures became too minute to accommodate the complexity of organic structure necessary for intelligent minds. The Star Maker would then watch the cosmical societies desperately striving to circumvent the fated degeneration of their race.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 3394-3397</div></div><p>With this listing of other cosmos, he shows how the intricate description of the previous 90% of the book could be written about any one of a myriad other cosmos.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Sometimes the Star Maker flung off creations which were in effect groups of many linked universes, wholly distinct physical systems of very different kinds, yet related by the fact that the creatures lived their lives successively in universe after universe, assuming in each habitat an indigenous physical form, but bearing with them in their transmigration faint and easily misinterpreted memories of earlier existences.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 3407-3409</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;This most subtle medium the Star Maker now rough-hewed into the general form of a cosmos. Thus he fashioned a still indeterminate space-time, as yet quite ungeometrized; an amorphous physicality with no clear quality or direction, no intricacy of physical laws; a more distinctly conceived vital trend and epic adventure of mentality; and a surprisingly definite climax and crown of spiritual lucidity.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 3499-3502</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;For instance, some of the later creations were designed with two or more temporal dimensions, and the lives of the creatures were temporal sequences in one or other dimension of the temporal “area” or “volume.” These beings experienced their cosmos in a very odd manner. Living for a brief period along one dimension, each perceived at every moment of its life a simultaneous vista which, though of course fragmentary and obscure, was actually a view of a whole unique “transverse” cosmical evolution in the other dimension. In some cases a creature had an active life in every temporal dimension of the cosmos. The divine skill which arranged the whole temporal “volume” in such a manner that all the infinite spontaneous acts of all the creatures should fit together to produce a coherent system of transverse evolutions far surpassed even the ingenuity of the earlier experiment in “pre-established harmony.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 3539-3546</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Every cosmos that I had hitherto observed now turned out to be a single example of a myriad-fold class, like a biological species, or the class of all the atoms of a single element. The internal life of each “atomic” cosmos had seemingly the same kind of relevance (and the same kind of irrelevance) to the life of the ultimate cosmos as the events within a brain cell, or in one of its atoms, to the life of a human mind. Yet in spite of this huge discrepancy I seemed to sense throughout the whole dizzying hierarchy of creations a striking identity of spirit.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 3577-3580</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;There had been a time when I myself, as the communal mind of a lowly cosmos, had looked upon the frustration and sorrow of my little members with equanimity, conscious that the suffering of these drowsy beings was no great price to pay for the lucidity that I myself contributed to reality. But the suffering individuals within the ultimate cosmos, though in comparison with the hosts of happy creatures they were few, were beings, it seemed to me, of my own, cosmical, mental stature, not the frail, shadowy existences that had contributed their dull griefs to my making. And this I could not endure.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 3591-3595</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;I singled out our window. We had been happy together! We had found, or we had created, our little treasure of community. This was the one rock in all the welter of experience. This, not the astronomical and hypercosmical immensity, nor even the planetary grain, this, this alone, was the solid ground of existence. On every side was confusion, a rising storm, great waves already drenching our rock. And all around, in the dark welter, faces and appealing hands, half-seen and vanishing.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 3646-3649</div></div>      </div>
      </div>
        <div class="footer">
    <div class="footer-data"><div class="footer-links"><ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/contact.php" title="">Contact</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/support.php" title="">Support</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/privacy.php" title="">Privacy</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/rights.php" title="">Rights</a></li></ul></div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="copyright">Copyright (c) 1999-2026 earthli.com. All Rights Reserved.</div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="versions">Powered by <ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore/app_news.php">earthli News 3.7</a></li><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore" title="">earthli WebCore&trade; 3.7</a></li></ul></div></div>    </div>
      </div>
  </div>  </body>
</html>
]]>
  </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
      <title type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[The New Watch by Sergei Lukyanenko (2011 -- en/2012) (read in 2018)]]>
  </title>
    <id>https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3569</id>
    <link href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3569"/>
    <updated>2018-12-26T21:02:21+01:00</updated>
    <author>
        <name type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[Marco von Ballmoos]]>
  </name>
      <uri>https://earthli.com/users/marco</uri>
    </author>
      <summary type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<blockquote class="quote abstract "><div>Disclaimer: these are notes I took while reading this book. They include citations I found interesting or enlightening or particularly well-written. In some cases, I&rsquo;ve pointed out which of these applies to which citation; in others, I have not. Any benefit you gain from reading these notes is... [<a class="complete-text-link" href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3569">More</a>]</div></blockquote>]]>
  </summary>
      <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<html lang="en">
  <head>
    <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/themes/ice.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/fonts/raleway.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/core/medium.css">
  </head>
  <body>
<div class="style-controls">  <div class="page">
    <div class="page-body">
<div class="info-box-top">
<p>
Published by <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_user.php?name=marco" title="Marco von Ballmoos" class="visible">marco</a> on <span class="date-time">26. Dec 2018 21:02:21 (GMT-5)</span>
</p>
</div>
      <div class="text-flow wide">
  <blockquote class="quote abstract "><div>Disclaimer: these are notes I took while reading this book. They include citations I found interesting or enlightening or particularly well-written. In some cases, I&rsquo;ve pointed out which of these applies to which citation; in others, I have not. Any benefit you gain from reading these notes is purely incidental to the purpose they serve of reminding me what I once read. Please see Wikipedia for a summary if I&rsquo;ve failed to provide one sufficient for your purposes. If my notes serve to trigger an interest in this book, then I&rsquo;m happy for you.</div></blockquote><p>The first volume deals with Prophets and Clairvoyants and how the Twilight deals with them. We learn that the Twilight has not just Mirrors, but Tigers. The Tiger is unstoppable and is there to prevent anyone from hearing a Prophet&rsquo;s &ldquo;main prophecy&rdquo;. Anton is there, once again, this time with the help of his now ten-year–old daughter, Nadya (the zero-point enchantress). The young prophet is saved from the Tiger in the nick of time—but the Twilight doesn&rsquo;t know about recording devices. And Kesha (the Prophet) was clutching a toy tape recorder when he emerged from the room into which he&rsquo;d revealed his prophecy to (supposedly) no-one.</p>
<p>In the second volume, Anton travels once again to London to meet a former Prophet, a Dark One named Erasmus Darwin to find out what his prophecy was and to find out more about Tigers and how to stop them. Darwin had avoided dying for his prophecy in a similar way to Kesha—by yelling into into the bole of an oak tree. Anton returns from London with a cup made from the wood of that tree.</p>
<h2>Citations</h2><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;If you know for certain that it’s impossible to win but, if you don’t fight, someone’s going to be killed . . . what would you do?” “If it’s impossible, why should I die too?” asked Las. “If you have to fight, it’s not important if you’re going to win,” Alisher answered.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 108</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;said Semyon, nodding. “Exalted feelings, noble impulses, reckless courage, foolhardy self-sacrifice—that’s all very fine. But there has to be a reason for it. A real reason. Otherwise all your Light Other aspirations amount to no more than stupidity. The annals of the Watches recall many Others who were noble but stupid. But they’re history now. And unfortunately their example is not worth imitating.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 111</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Children were not special creatures, requiring different treatment, food, and clothing. They were simply little human beings who might possibly be fortunate enough to become full-fledged adults. Even in the paintings of the finest artists of that time the bodies and faces of children were indistinguishable from the bodies and faces of adults—if the artist’s eye did detect the difference in proportions, his mind rejected the distinction. A boy was simply a little man. A girl was simply a little woman . . . indeed, girls changed their status and became women very quickly, and no one found that disconcerting. Leavened with the first yeast of civilization, the human dough was seething and expanding. Humankind had to grow. And for that, there had to be as many births as possible, because it was beyond human power to reduce the number of deaths.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 169</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;You foretell the future, even though with little skill as yet. But tell me: in three or four hundred years, who will rule on the Capitol Hill?” “A black man will ascend the throne and all will glorify him as a peacemaker. But he will send iron birds across the ocean to seize the treasures of the Libyans and the Persians, and by that shall be caused a great war and convulsions in the world . . .” the boy intoned slowly, as if he was sleepy. “Hmm,” said Erasmus’s companion, scratching the tip of his nose. “No, you are still far from your main prophecy. Too many errors. The Italians are always fighting the Arabs, but how can a black man rule in Rome? Persia—well and good . . . but there are no treasures in Libya, it is all desert that engenders nothing but a useless black oil. And even if there are iron birds in the world at that time—what ocean is this? Italy is separated from Libya by only a sea. No, too many errors—you are not yet ready.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 172</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Fan laughed. “The Twilight needs the blue moss for one purpose. The Tiger for another. And the Others for yet another. But all of us together do the same thing—we stir up humankind, we jolt people, make them do something, invent something, strive for something . . . sometimes they achieve success, sometimes they take a beating. We are all part of the Twilight, its symbiotes if you like. Its hands and feet, eyes and ears. The rakes and spades it uses to cultivate its vegetable patch—humankind. Do you wish to rebel against the Tiger? You will be rebelling against the Twilight.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 266</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;“Overall there has been some progress,” I said, disagreeing. “In wartime they used to annihilate people or turn them into slaves, the peasants starved to death . . .” “And now in wartime they torture them and poison them with gas in concentration camps, bomb them with high-precision smart bombs, or, in the very best of cases, they occupy countries economically and turn them into powerless satellites. And where there is no war—they dumb down their own people and treat them like cattle.” Las spread his hands emphatically. “All those Genghis Khans, Xerxeses, and Caligulas were more honest, I reckon. So far, there is nothing to respect human beings for.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 310</div></div>      </div>
      </div>
        <div class="footer">
    <div class="footer-data"><div class="footer-links"><ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/contact.php" title="">Contact</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/support.php" title="">Support</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/privacy.php" title="">Privacy</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/rights.php" title="">Rights</a></li></ul></div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="copyright">Copyright (c) 1999-2026 earthli.com. All Rights Reserved.</div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="versions">Powered by <ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore/app_news.php">earthli News 3.7</a></li><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore" title="">earthli WebCore&trade; 3.7</a></li></ul></div></div>    </div>
      </div>
  </div>  </body>
</html>
]]>
  </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
      <title type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[The Sixth Watch by Sergei Lukyanenko (2012 -- en/2013) (read in 2018)]]>
  </title>
    <id>https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3582</id>
    <link href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3582"/>
    <updated>2018-12-26T21:00:22+01:00</updated>
    <author>
        <name type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[Marco von Ballmoos]]>
  </name>
      <uri>https://earthli.com/users/marco</uri>
    </author>
      <summary type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<blockquote class="quote abstract "><div>Disclaimer: these are notes I took while reading this book. They include citations I found interesting or enlightening or particularly well-written. In some cases, I&rsquo;ve pointed out which of these applies to which citation; in others, I have not. Any benefit you gain from reading these notes is... [<a class="complete-text-link" href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3582">More</a>]</div></blockquote>]]>
  </summary>
      <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<html lang="en">
  <head>
    <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/themes/ice.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/fonts/raleway.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/core/medium.css">
  </head>
  <body>
<div class="style-controls">  <div class="page">
    <div class="page-body">
<div class="info-box-top">
<p>
Published by <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_user.php?name=marco" title="Marco von Ballmoos" class="visible">marco</a> on <span class="date-time">26. Dec 2018 21:00:22 (GMT-5)</span>
</p>
</div>
      <div class="text-flow wide">
  <blockquote class="quote abstract "><div>Disclaimer: these are notes I took while reading this book. They include citations I found interesting or enlightening or particularly well-written. In some cases, I&rsquo;ve pointed out which of these applies to which citation; in others, I have not. Any benefit you gain from reading these notes is purely incidental to the purpose they serve of reminding me what I once read. Please see Wikipedia for a summary if I&rsquo;ve failed to provide one sufficient for your purposes. If my notes serve to trigger an interest in this book, then I&rsquo;m happy for you.</div></blockquote><p>This is final installment in the Watch Series. In this one, Anton&rsquo;s daughter Nadya is threatened at her school, where two magicians sweep through with a power completely beyond what each has on his own. The prophets have foretold attacks of this sort and predict the end of the world in five days&rsquo; time.</p>
<p>We learn more about the ancient order of the vampires—the world&rsquo;s supposed first children. The day and night watch of Moscow are basically working together, attending the high councils of the vampires and witches as they each seek to elect a member to be part of the Sixth Watch. There are also the form-takers and the Foundation. All representatives of the watch will likely die when the council convenes.</p>
<p>The watch is there to combat the Twilight itself, which is embodied in a human-like figure. In the end, it is Anton who thwarts the twilight and restores order and balance.</p>
<h2>Citations</h2><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Or take the healers’ recipes. Light magic, no horror involved . . . as a general rule. Looking at the popular recipe for a migraine elixir, we discover that five of the seven ingredients are not written down, but are denoted by smells! That is, you have to sniff the pages of the book! And yes, you’re quite right, if you write in “vanilla,” “chestnut honey,” or “rye bread” instead of including the smells, the elixir won’t work. The healer has to sniff the ingredients as he makes up the recipe, even “powdered chalk,” which doesn’t smell of anything much. Even “spring water,” which doesn’t have any kind of odor at all.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 27</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;In a modern city you don’t often come across anyone running. People often plod slowly past the shop windows. When they walk, it’s always fast. But running . . . There are two scenarios for that: a short sprint to the bus stop, hoping to catch a bus that’s already leaving, and the daily spurt of some enthusiastic follower of a healthy lifestyle—somewhere in a park or close to one—wearing a natty tracksuit with headphones jammed into their ears. Anyone running, who isn’t running to a bus stop or wearing a tracksuit, automatically arouses suspicion.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 49</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;And those who can’t are dealing with their usual business. Their own bread, their own melody, their own pickpockets. Their own foolish little investigation. Even if the apocalypse is upon us. Because if it doesn’t happen, the grain must not rot in the ground, and the song must still be sung. And the thief must sit in jail. And abuses of office must be investigated.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 154</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;“But where is it any better? Russian pigheadedness and drunkenness? American chauvinism and hypocrisy? European self-righteousness? Asiatic cruelty?” “They’re all people,” I said. “And are we any better?” asked the witch. “Our side or your side . . . Perhaps we should just let it happen, eh?” I turned my eyes toward the half-open door of the sleeping room, where the children were lying in their beds. Little arms and legs dangling out from under blankets, socks and sandals lying on the floor. “Are they guilty too?” I asked. “Do they have to die too?” “Everyone has to die sometime,” the witch replied. “They might not be guilty of anything, but that’s only for now . . . It will all happen sooner or later. A hundred years ago I’d definitely have turned a couple of them into piglets, to keep them out of mischief.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 171</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;“Nadenka, don’t ever think you’re more cunning than your parents are. I was a little girl too, and I remember very well all the thoughts you have swarming around in your head right now. And believe me, not many of them are clever ones.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 223</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;“I feel very sorry for the pure, organic beefcake, the passionate Caucasian, and the innocent blond boy,” I said. “But in a few days all the beefcakes, Caucasians, and blond-haired boys in the world could die. And if the death of three innocents will save the world, then so be it.” “So you’re no longer trying to solve the problem of a child’s tears?” Zabulon asked merrily, slumping back in his chair. “So now you’re looking at the problem of Omelas?”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 232</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;“You have a quarter of an hour,” said the witch. “You can have a glass of beer or wine in the bar. Or vodka, if you like. What do you usually drink in the evenings?” “No, I can’t have vodka, I promised my bear that I wouldn’t drink any without him,”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 317</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;“You see, Anton, we witches are rather superstitious. So we’ve been holding the six hundred and sixty-fifth session of our Conclave for almost a century now. It has become a tradition.” “An interesting solution,” I said. “That’s what I think too,” the witch replied without a trace of irony. “After all, the most important things in life are peace of mind and a positive attitude.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 317</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;I sighed, and stepped toward the Tiger. “Just as I thought,” he remarked sadly. “Gorodetsky, why don’t you like simple solutions?” “They usually have complicated consequences,” I replied.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 332</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The Two-in-One is the great balancer, the eraser, the purger. If human civilization goes off the rails, he comes and destroys it. He reduces life to the most basic, banal truths. Eating, drinking, killing, reproducing. That’s what the Two-in-One does, he simplifies.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 340</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;“What’s so strange about that?” Zabulon exclaimed gleefully. “It’s not evil to smack your neighbor over the head with a club, make him work in your field, and make his wife warm your bed. That’s normal, natural behavior. Basic practicality. Animals are also beyond good and evil—when a wolf kills a hare, it doesn’t feel any hatred. Evil is when you convince your neighbor that he ought to work in your field, give his wife to you, and sing your praises at the same time.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 355</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;THE DAY WATCH OFFICE WAS EMPTY. ZABULON HAD SENT ALL his colleagues home, even the operational duty officers, before we appeared. They wouldn’t have been a help in any case. So the tea and sandwiches were brought by Sveta and Nadya.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 365</div></div><p>Because of course they were</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;“Yes it does!” Nadya protested. “The kids asked me in school: ‘Gorodetsky, are you a Jew?’ And I said there weren’t any Jews in my family. But there are. I lied to them all!”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 362</div></div><p>A couple of times this has happened. The anti-semitism is a bit thicker than seems appropriate for the context.</p>
      </div>
      </div>
        <div class="footer">
    <div class="footer-data"><div class="footer-links"><ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/contact.php" title="">Contact</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/support.php" title="">Support</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/privacy.php" title="">Privacy</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/rights.php" title="">Rights</a></li></ul></div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="copyright">Copyright (c) 1999-2026 earthli.com. All Rights Reserved.</div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="versions">Powered by <ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore/app_news.php">earthli News 3.7</a></li><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore" title="">earthli WebCore&trade; 3.7</a></li></ul></div></div>    </div>
      </div>
  </div>  </body>
</html>
]]>
  </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
      <title type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[The Last Watch by Sergei Lukyanenko (2006 -- en/2008) (read in 2018)]]>
  </title>
    <id>https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3568</id>
    <link href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3568"/>
    <updated>2018-09-01T20:59:04+02:00</updated>
    <author>
        <name type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[Marco von Ballmoos]]>
  </name>
      <uri>https://earthli.com/users/marco</uri>
    </author>
      <summary type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<blockquote class="quote abstract "><div>Disclaimer: these are notes I took while reading this book. They include citations I found interesting or enlightening or particularly well-written. In some cases, I&rsquo;ve pointed out which of these applies to which citation; in others, I have not. Any benefit you gain from reading these notes is... [<a class="complete-text-link" href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3568">More</a>]</div></blockquote>]]>
  </summary>
      <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<html lang="en">
  <head>
    <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/themes/ice.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/fonts/raleway.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/core/medium.css">
  </head>
  <body>
<div class="style-controls">  <div class="page">
    <div class="page-body">
<div class="info-box-top">
<p>
Published by <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_user.php?name=marco" title="Marco von Ballmoos" class="visible">marco</a> on <span class="date-time">1. Sep 2018 20:59:04 (GMT-5)</span>
</p>
</div>
      <div class="text-flow wide">
  <blockquote class="quote abstract "><div>Disclaimer: these are notes I took while reading this book. They include citations I found interesting or enlightening or particularly well-written. In some cases, I&rsquo;ve pointed out which of these applies to which citation; in others, I have not. Any benefit you gain from reading these notes is purely incidental to the purpose they serve of reminding me what I once read. Please see Wikipedia for a summary if I&rsquo;ve failed to provide one sufficient for your purposes. If my notes serve to trigger an interest in this book, then I&rsquo;m happy for you.</div></blockquote><p>As a result of Kostya&rsquo;s activity with the <em>Fuaran</em> in the previous book, Anton is now a Higher magician. Gesar sends him to Scotland to investigate a mysterious vampire killing. It turns out that there is a trio of Others—a Light One, a Dark One and an Inquisitor—trying to get at Merlin&rsquo;s greatest creation. Merlin is/was a so-called zero-point magician—a magician who was zero natural magic and can absorb more Power from the environment than any Others and is therefore more powerful. The only other known such magician is Nadya, Anton and Svetlana&rsquo;s daughter. In this volume, we learn that Merlin hid the Crown of All Things on the seventh level of the Twilight.</p>
<p>The second volume expands on this, sending Anton to Uzbekistan to find Rustam, an ancient wizard who used to ride with Gesar, back in the day. He was with Gesar when they called down the most terrible spell every used against Dark Ones—the White Mist. Instead of killing them, it froze them into statues without any sensory input, driving them mad over the ensuring millennia. Rustam is still punishing himself for having taken part in this travesty, whereas Gesar had made his peace with it. We discover that Edgar is the Inquisitor that is part of the trio trying to get Merlin&rsquo;s secret.</p>
<p>In the third volume, more is revealed about Merlin&rsquo;s spell as well as how the Twilight works and how many levels it actually has. Where is the Crown of All Things hidden? Anton eventually finds out and uses his Higher power to wield it in an unexpected way, freeing the age-old Dark Ones frozen in time to their final reward—as well as Merlin and thousands of Others from the Purgatory/Paradise of the sixth level of the Twilight.</p>
<h2>Citations</h2><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Cars didn’t often come this way, and they were mostly taxis. Most of the people were walking. The streams moving in the direction of the castle and back intermingled, swirling together in quiet whirlpools around the performers doing their thing in the middle of the street; thin rivulets trickled into the pubs, filtered in through the doorways of the shops. The boundless river of humanity.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 54</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;“If you haven’t seen the body, don’t be in a hurry to bury it.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 117</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;You shall receive all and nothing, when you are able to take it. Proceed, if you are as strong as I; Or go back, if you are as wise as I. Beginning and end, head and tail, all is fused in one In the Crown of All Things. Thus are life and death inseparable.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 147</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;“Even dollars or euros,” the driver replied nonchalantly. “Give me as much as you think you can spare. I can see you’re a good man, so why haggle? A good man is ashamed not to pay a poor taxi driver enough. He pays more than my conscience will allow me to ask.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 190</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;But we have one spell in reserve, a spell that has never yet been uttered beneath this sun. It was brought back by Rustam from an island far away in the north, where it was invented by a cunning Light One by the name of Merlin. But even he, who stood so dangerously close to the Dark, had been horrified by it…. The White Mist. Rustam pronounces strange, coarse-sounding words. I repeat them after him, without even trying to understand their meaning. The words are important, but they are only the hand of the potter, giving shape to the clay, shaping the clay mold into which the molten metal will be poured, creating bronze manacles that allow no freedom to the hands. There are words at the beginning and end, words that provide the form and the direction, but it is Power that decides everything. Power and Will. I can no longer hold back the force that is pulsing within me, ready to tear my pitiful human body apart with every beat of my heart. I open my mouth at the same time as Rustam. I shout, but I shout without words. The time for words is over.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 240</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;But we have one spell in reserve, a spell that has never yet been uttered beneath this sun. It was brought back by Rustam from an island far away in the north, where it was invented by a cunning Light One by the name of Merlin. But even he, who stood so dangerously close to the Dark, had been horrified by it…. The White Mist. Rustam pronounces strange, coarse-sounding words. I repeat them after him, without even trying to understand their meaning. The words are important, but they are only the hand of the potter, giving shape to the clay, shaping the clay mold into which the molten metal will be poured, creating bronze manacles that allow no freedom to the hands. There are words at the beginning and end, words that provide the form and the direction, but it is Power that decides everything. Power and Will. I can no longer hold back the force that is pulsing within me, ready to tear my pitiful human body apart with every beat of my heart. I open my mouth at the same time as Rustam. I shout, but I shout without words. The time for words is over.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 240</div></div>      </div>
      </div>
        <div class="footer">
    <div class="footer-data"><div class="footer-links"><ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/contact.php" title="">Contact</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/support.php" title="">Support</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/privacy.php" title="">Privacy</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/rights.php" title="">Rights</a></li></ul></div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="copyright">Copyright (c) 1999-2026 earthli.com. All Rights Reserved.</div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="versions">Powered by <ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore/app_news.php">earthli News 3.7</a></li><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore" title="">earthli WebCore&trade; 3.7</a></li></ul></div></div>    </div>
      </div>
  </div>  </body>
</html>
]]>
  </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
      <title type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[The Night Watch by Sergei Lukyanenko (1998 -- en/2006) (read in 2018)]]>
  </title>
    <id>https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3567</id>
    <link href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3567"/>
    <updated>2018-09-01T20:54:20+02:00</updated>
    <author>
        <name type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[Marco von Ballmoos]]>
  </name>
      <uri>https://earthli.com/users/marco</uri>
    </author>
      <summary type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<blockquote class="quote abstract "><div>Disclaimer: these are notes I took while reading this book. They include citations I found interesting or enlightening or particularly well-written. In some cases, I&rsquo;ve pointed out which of these applies to which citation; in others, I have not. Any benefit you gain from reading these notes is... [<a class="complete-text-link" href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3567">More</a>]</div></blockquote>]]>
  </summary>
      <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<html lang="en">
  <head>
    <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/themes/ice.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/fonts/raleway.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/core/medium.css">
  </head>
  <body>
<div class="style-controls">  <div class="page">
    <div class="page-body">
<div class="info-box-top">
<p>
Published by <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_user.php?name=marco" title="Marco von Ballmoos" class="visible">marco</a> on <span class="date-time">1. Sep 2018 20:54:20 (GMT-5)</span>
</p>
</div>
      <div class="text-flow wide">
  <blockquote class="quote abstract "><div>Disclaimer: these are notes I took while reading this book. They include citations I found interesting or enlightening or particularly well-written. In some cases, I&rsquo;ve pointed out which of these applies to which citation; in others, I have not. Any benefit you gain from reading these notes is purely incidental to the purpose they serve of reminding me what I once read. Please see Wikipedia for a summary if I&rsquo;ve failed to provide one sufficient for your purposes. If my notes serve to trigger an interest in this book, then I&rsquo;m happy for you.</div></blockquote><p>This is the first novel in what would end up being a six-book series, set in the real world with the Twilight as a backdrop. The world is the same as the one we know, but some people are not humans, but Others. These Others are divided (unevenly) into Dark and Light Ones. This book introduces characters that would be in all of the books, but focuses on the development of Anton Gorodetsky, a low-level Light Other who works in the Night Watch. The Night Watch works at night and keeps an eye on the Dark Others. The Day Watch works during the day and keeps an eye on the Light Others.</p>
<p>The Twilight is another layer of reality to which Others have access, but humans do not. It is from here that Others draw their power to perform magic. It&rsquo;s a very interesting mythology, equal to the Harry Potter world, I think, with a bit more for adults than the earlier books in that series.</p>
<p>In this book, Lukyanenko develops Anton as well as Sveltana (a Great Enchantress) and Egor (a potential Mirror) and Maxim (an eventual Inquisitor) as well as introducing Boris Ignatievich, or Gesar, the oldest and most powerful of the Light Ones in the Moscow Night Watch.</p>
<h2>Citations</h2><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The car hurtled through the night, as if it were trying to overtake the beams of its own headlights.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 2537-2538</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;You know, they’ve started selling fake New Year Tree decorations in Moscow. They look just like the real thing, but they don’t bring people any joy at all.” She told the short joke with an absolutely straight face, without even changing her tone of voice.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 6000-6002</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;He could tell himself a thousand times over that no arguments and disputes between states had anything to do with the concerns of the Light and the Darkness. He could accept that in a war this airman-magician was far more likely not to aim his bombs at civilians. But even so . . . Just how could he manage to go out on bombing raids and drop his explosives on people’s heads, and still remain a Light One? Because he was a Light One, no doubt about that! But he almost certainly had human lives on his conscience. How did he manage not to fall back into the Twilight? What incredible faith he must have in his own righteousness, to be able to combine active military service and the cause of the Light.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 13869-13874</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;And what if I had defied all the stipulations of the Treaty and made that intervention in secret? A brief gesture of the hand . . . And then what? There wasn’t any work in the village. And nobody in the city wanted Kolya, a former collective farm mechanic. Kolya didn’t have any money to start “his own business.” He couldn’t even buy a piglet. So he’d go off again to look for moonshine, getting by on money from odd jobs, and working off his anger on his wife, who drank as much as he did and was just as weary of everything. It wasn’t the man I needed to heal—it was the entire planet Earth. Or at least this particular sixth part of the planet Earth. The part with the proud name of Russia.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 17818-17823</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;It all sounded pretty strange. In my own mind, I’d always thought of Others as individuals with strongly developed magical abilities. But the point of view expressed here was the exact opposite of that. In fact the following amusing comparison was used as an example: Say the temperature throughout the entire world is 97.7&amp;#730;F. Then most people, with a body temperature higher than that, will radiate heat outward and “warm nature.” But the small number of people who for some reason have a body temperature lower than 97.7&amp;#730;F will start taking in heat. And since they receive a constant influx of Power, they will be able to make use of it, while people with far warmer temperatures carry on aimlessly “heating nature.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 18671-18677</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;There’ll never be a time when all people become Others. We’ll never reveal ourselves to them. And we’ll never allow people to build a more or less decent society. Capitalism, communism . . . that’s not the point. The only world that will ever suit us is one in which people are preoccupied with the size of the trough and the quality of hay. Because the moment they lift their heads out of the trough, look around and see us, we’ll be finished.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 19930-19934</div></div>      </div>
      </div>
        <div class="footer">
    <div class="footer-data"><div class="footer-links"><ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/contact.php" title="">Contact</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/support.php" title="">Support</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/privacy.php" title="">Privacy</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/rights.php" title="">Rights</a></li></ul></div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="copyright">Copyright (c) 1999-2026 earthli.com. All Rights Reserved.</div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="versions">Powered by <ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore/app_news.php">earthli News 3.7</a></li><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore" title="">earthli WebCore&trade; 3.7</a></li></ul></div></div>    </div>
      </div>
  </div>  </body>
</html>
]]>
  </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
      <title type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[Rogues edited by George R.R. Martin and Gardner Dozois (2014) (read in 2018)]]>
  </title>
    <id>https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3555</id>
    <link href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3555"/>
    <updated>2018-09-01T16:51:36+02:00</updated>
    <author>
        <name type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[Marco von Ballmoos]]>
  </name>
      <uri>https://earthli.com/users/marco</uri>
    </author>
      <summary type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<blockquote class="quote abstract "><div>Disclaimer: these are notes I took while reading this book. They include citations I found interesting or enlightening or particularly well-written. In some cases, I&rsquo;ve pointed out which of these applies to which citation; in others, I have not. Any benefit you gain from reading these notes is... [<a class="complete-text-link" href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3555">More</a>]</div></blockquote>]]>
  </summary>
      <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<html lang="en">
  <head>
    <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/themes/ice.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/fonts/raleway.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/core/medium.css">
  </head>
  <body>
<div class="style-controls">  <div class="page">
    <div class="page-body">
<div class="info-box-top">
<p>
Published by <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_user.php?name=marco" title="Marco von Ballmoos" class="visible">marco</a> on <span class="date-time">1. Sep 2018 16:51:36 (GMT-5)</span>
</p>
</div>
      <div class="text-flow wide">
  <blockquote class="quote abstract "><div>Disclaimer: these are notes I took while reading this book. They include citations I found interesting or enlightening or particularly well-written. In some cases, I&rsquo;ve pointed out which of these applies to which citation; in others, I have not. Any benefit you gain from reading these notes is purely incidental to the purpose they serve of reminding me what I once read. Please see Wikipedia for a summary if I&rsquo;ve failed to provide one sufficient for your purposes. If my notes serve to trigger an interest in this book, then I&rsquo;m happy for you.</div></blockquote><p>This is a collection of short stories and novellas edited by two of the titans of fantasy and science fiction. See the <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rogues_(anthology)">Wikipedia article</a> for a list of all 21 stories. The stories all star a &ldquo;rogue&rdquo; of one type or other, with authors ranging from Gillian Flynn (Gone Girl) to Joe Lansdale (Hap and Leonard) to Neil Gaiman to Patrick Rothfuss and, finally, to George R.R. Martin himself. A good collection of stories with something for everyone, I think.</p>
<h2>Citations</h2><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Until then, Javre walked, swift and steady, with her shoulders back. She loved to walk. With every stride, she felt her own strength. Every muscle utterly relaxed, yet ready to turn the next step in a split instant into mighty spring, sprightly roll, deadly strike. Without needing to look, she felt each person about her, judged their threat, predicted their attack, imagined her response, the air around her alive with calculated possibilities, the surroundings mapped, the distances known, all things of use noted. The sternest tests are those you do not see coming, so Javre was the weapon always sharpened, the weapon never sheathed, the answer to every question.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 590-594</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Raffalon groaned. In his experience, entities that spoke in such a high-toned manner tended to have an acute regard for themselves that was inversely matched by a lack of concern for the comfort of those who minioned for them—indeed, even for their continued existence.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 1407-1409</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Then he addressed the little piece of carved wood in his hand and repeated his original question: “What are you?” Less than I was, less than I shall be. Raffalon groaned. In his experience, entities that spoke in such a high-toned manner tended to have an acute regard for themselves that was inversely matched by a lack of concern for the comfort of those who minioned for them—indeed, even for their continued existence.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 1405-1409</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;“The ancients had a saying,” Surplus interjected. “ ‘If you want to make God laugh, tell him your plans.’&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 2782-2783</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;“Love is like a baby sleeping on its mother’s breast,” Steppan said. “Inchoate and likely to piss itself?” “Ah, you can play at being a cynic, my friend, but I’ve known you too long. You’re a romantic at heart. You’re in love with the world.” “I’d say I’m inchoate and likely to piss myself,” Asa said, trying not to smile. Steppan’s pleasure was simple and unfeigned and infectious. “Fine! Fine, then love isn’t like a baby. Love is like falling from a window and discovering you can fly.” “Unlikely to happen and dangerous to try.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 6725-6731</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;For a long moment, they were silent with their private thoughts. “Love,” Asa said, “is like a pigeon shitting over a crowd.” “How so?” “Where it lands hasn’t got much to do with who deserves it.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 6830-6833</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The triangle produced a massive number of Bruce-generated headlines, in which Ella wept to her friends, or broke down on the set of Kimberley, or flew to the States to beg me to come back to her. Some weeks the tabloids dutifully reported that Loni and I were fighting on the set or had broken up; some weeks we were about to announce our engagement. Sometimes she’d catch me talking on the phone to Ella and be furious, and sometimes I secretly flew off to Africa to be with Ella. I was always happy to see myself in the headlines, even if the stories weren’t remotely true.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 8492-8496</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;To me, the drones are cheating. As far as I’m concerned, the tabloids are supposed to report the stories our publicists give them, not start their own air force and find out stuff on their own.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 8501-8503</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;I have seen many things in my life,” said Piros, “and I have never found fear to be useful.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 9847-9848</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;It was baffling. These creatures. They were fraught and frayed in their desire. A snake would never poison itself, but these folk made an art of it. They wrapped themselves in fears and wept at being blind. It was infuriating. It was enough to break a heart.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 13062-13064</div></div>      </div>
      </div>
        <div class="footer">
    <div class="footer-data"><div class="footer-links"><ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/contact.php" title="">Contact</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/support.php" title="">Support</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/privacy.php" title="">Privacy</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/rights.php" title="">Rights</a></li></ul></div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="copyright">Copyright (c) 1999-2026 earthli.com. All Rights Reserved.</div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="versions">Powered by <ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore/app_news.php">earthli News 3.7</a></li><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore" title="">earthli WebCore&trade; 3.7</a></li></ul></div></div>    </div>
      </div>
  </div>  </body>
</html>
]]>
  </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
      <title type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[Dispatches by Michael Herr (1977) (read in 2018)]]>
  </title>
    <id>https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3566</id>
    <link href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3566"/>
    <updated>2018-09-01T16:37:11+02:00</updated>
    <author>
        <name type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[Marco von Ballmoos]]>
  </name>
      <uri>https://earthli.com/users/marco</uri>
    </author>
      <summary type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<blockquote class="quote abstract "><div>Disclaimer: these are notes I took while reading this book. They include citations I found interesting or enlightening or particularly well-written. In some cases, I&rsquo;ve pointed out which of these applies to which citation; in others, I have not. Any benefit you gain from reading these notes is... [<a class="complete-text-link" href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3566">More</a>]</div></blockquote>]]>
  </summary>
      <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<html lang="en">
  <head>
    <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/themes/ice.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/fonts/raleway.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/core/medium.css">
  </head>
  <body>
<div class="style-controls">  <div class="page">
    <div class="page-body">
<div class="info-box-top">
<p>
Published by <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_user.php?name=marco" title="Marco von Ballmoos" class="visible">marco</a> on <span class="date-time">1. Sep 2018 16:37:11 (GMT-5)</span>
</p>
<p>
Updated by <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_user.php?name=marco" title="Marco von Ballmoos" class="visible">marco</a> on <span class="date-time">1. Sep 2018 16:39:30 (GMT-5)</span>
</p>
</div>
      <div class="text-flow wide">
  <blockquote class="quote abstract "><div>Disclaimer: these are notes I took while reading this book. They include citations I found interesting or enlightening or particularly well-written. In some cases, I&rsquo;ve pointed out which of these applies to which citation; in others, I have not. Any benefit you gain from reading these notes is purely incidental to the purpose they serve of reminding me what I once read. Please see Wikipedia for a summary if I&rsquo;ve failed to provide one sufficient for your purposes. If my notes serve to trigger an interest in this book, then I&rsquo;m happy for you.</div></blockquote><p>This is a journal about the Vietnam War, written by journalist Michael Herr, who spent two years there in the late 60s. The storytelling is visceral and well-written, describing soldiers and attacks and life in Vietnam under the occupation. The impression is surreal and the book doesn&rsquo;t try to explain or clean up the ugliness of it all. It presents information, within a scaffolding of disapproval of the war, but at the same time acknowledging the seductiveness of it for reporters, for those involved in it, for those poisoned into not being able to live without it. An excellent book, probably the best thing I&rsquo;ve ever read about one of America&rsquo;s wars—or, indeed, any colonial occupation. It&rsquo;s likely that this book describes them all adequately, not just Vietnam, but Iraq and Afghanistan or India and Africa for the European powers. A sobering look into the depths of human cruelty and stupidity. Herr has only one movie-writing credit: <em>Apocalypse Now</em>.</p>
<h2>Citations</h2><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;They were wired into their listening posts out around the camp, into each other, into themselves, and when it got dark it got worse. The moon came up nasty and full, a fat moist piece of decadent fruit. It was soft and saffron-misted when you looked up at it, but its light over the sandbags and into the jungle was harsh and bright.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 11</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;I went to cover the war and the war covered me; an old story, unless of course you’ve never heard it. I went there behind the crude but serious belief that you had to be able to look at anything, serious because I acted on it and went, crude because I didn’t know, it took the war to teach it, that you were as responsible for everything you saw as you were for everything you did. The problem was that you didn’t always know what you were seeing until later, maybe years later, that a lot of it never made it in at all, it just stayed stored there in your eyes. Time and information, rock and roll, life itself, the information isn’t frozen, you are.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 20</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;But once in a while you’d hear something fresh, and a couple of times you’d even hear something high, like the corpsman at Khe Sanh who said, “If it ain’t the fucking incoming it’s the fucking outgoing. Only difference is who gets the fucking grease, and that ain’t no fucking difference at all.” The mix was so amazing; incipient saints and realized homicidals, unconscious lyric poets and mean dumb motherfuckers with their brains all down in their necks; and even though by the time I left I knew where all the stories came from and where they were going, I was never bored, never even unsurprised.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 30</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Beautiful for once and only once, just past dawn flying toward the center of the city in a Loach, view from a bubble floating at 800 feet. In that space, at that hour, you could see what people had seen forty years before, Paris of the East, Pearl of the Orient, long open avenues lined and bowered over by trees running into spacious parks, precisioned scale, all under the soft shell from a million breakfast fires, camphor smoke rising and diffusing, covering Saigon and the shining veins of the river with a warmth like the return of better times.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 38</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;By 7:30 it was beyond berserk with bikes, the air was like L.A. on short plumbing, the subtle city war inside the war had renewed itself for another day, relatively light on actual violence but intense with bad feeling: despair, impacted rage, impotent gnawing resentment; thousands of Vietnamese in the service of a pyramid that wouldn’t stand for five years, plugging the feed tube into their own hearts, grasping and gorging; young Americans in from the boonies on TDY, charged with hatred and grounded in fear of the Vietnamese; thousands of Americans sitting in their offices crying in bored chorus, “You can’t get these people to do a fucking thing, you can’t get these people to do a fucking thing.” And all the others, theirs and ours, who just didn’t want to play, it sickened them.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 39</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;They could snap a Rolex off your wrist like a hawk hitting a field mouse; wallets, pens, cameras, eyeglasses, anything; if the war had gone on any longer they’d have found a way to whip the boots off your feet.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 40</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;You’d either meet an optimism that no violence could unconvince or a cynicism that would eat itself empty every day and then turn, hungry and malignant, on whatever it could for a bite, friendly or hostile, it didn’t matter. Those men called dead Vietnamese “believers,” a lost American platoon was “a black eye,” they talked as though killing a man was nothing more than depriving him of his vigor.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 42</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;You’d stand nailed there in your tracks sometimes, no bearings and none in sight, thinking, Where the fuck am I?, fallen into some unnatural East-West interface, a California corridor cut and bought and burned deep into Asia, and once we’d done it we couldn’t remember what for. It was axiomatic that it was about ideological space, we were there to bring them the choice, bringing it to them like Sherman bringing the Jubilee through Georgia, clean through it, wall to wall with pacified indigenous and scorched earth.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 43</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;In wood-paneled, air-conditioned chapels in Saigon, MACV padres would fire one up to sweet muscular Jesus, blessing ammo dumps and 105’s and officers’ clubs. The best-armed patrols in history went out after services to feed smoke to people whose priests could let themselves burn down to consecrated ash on street corners. Deep in the alleys you could hear small Buddhist chimes ringing for peace, hoa bien; smell incense in the middle of the thickest Asian street funk; see groups of ARVN with their families waiting for transport huddled around a burning prayer strip. Sermonettes came over Armed Forces radio every couple of hours, once I heard a chaplain from the 9th Division starting up, “Oh Gawd, help us learn to live with Thee in a more dynamic way in these perilous times, that we may better serve Thee in the struggle against Thine enemies.…” Holy war, long-nose jihad like a face-off between one god who would hold the coonskin to the wall while we nailed it up, and another whose detachment would see the blood run out of ten generations, if that was how long it took for the wheel to go around.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 45</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Maybe it was already over for us in Indochina when Alden Pyle’s body washed up under the bridge at Dakao, his lungs all full of mud; maybe it caved in with Dien Bien Phu. But the first happened in a novel, and while the second happened on the ground it happened to the French, and Washington gave it no more substance than if Graham Greene had made it up too.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 49</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;I met a ranger-recondo who could go to sleep just like that, say, “Guess I’ll get some,” close his eyes and be there, day or night, sitting or lying down, sleeping through some things but not others; a loud radio or a 105 firing outside the tent wouldn’t wake him, but a rustle in the bushes fifty feet away would, or a stopped generator.)&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 53</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;There were spots in the jungle where you had to have a cigarette going all the time, whether you smoked or not, just to keep the mosquitoes from swarming into your mouth. War under water, swamp fever and instant involuntary weight control, malarias that could burn you out and cave you in, put you into twenty-three hours of sleep a day without giving you a minute of rest,&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 54</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;One night I woke up and heard the sounds of a firefight going on kilometers away, a “skirmish” outside our perimeter, muffled by distance to sound like the noises we made playing guns as children, KSSSHH KSSSHH; we knew it was more authentic than BANG BANG, it enriched the game and this game was the same, only way out of hand at last, too rich for all but a few serious players. The rules now were tight and absolute, no arguing over who missed who and who was really dead; No fair was no good, Why me? the saddest question in the world.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 55</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Even bitter refracted faith was better than none at all, like the black Marine I’d heard about during heavy shelling at Con Thien who said, “Don’t worry, baby, God’ll think of something.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 56</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;A lot of people knew that the country could never be won, only destroyed, and they locked into that with breathtaking concentration, no quarter, laying down the seeds of the disease, roundeye fever, until it reached plague proportions, taking one from every family, a family from every hamlet, a hamlet from every province, until a million had died from it and millions more were left uncentered and lost in their flight from it.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 59</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;deep in all their hearts, there were always the Nukes, they loved to remind you that we had some, “right here in-country.” Once I met a colonel who had a plan to shorten the war by dropping piranha into the paddies of the North. He was talking fish but his dreamy eyes were full of mega-death.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 60</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Charles really wrote the book on fire control, putting one round into the heart of things where fifty of ours might go and still not hit anything. Sometimes we put out so much fire you couldn’t tell whether any of it was coming back or not. When it was, it filled your ears and your head until you thought you were hearing it with your stomach.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 62</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;“Quakin’ and Shakin’,” they called it, great balls of fire, Contact. Then it was you and the ground: kiss it, eat it, fuck it, plow it with your whole body, get as close to it as you can without being in it yet or of it, guess who’s flying around about an inch above your head? Pucker and submit, it’s the ground. Under Fire would take you out of your head and your body too, the space you’d seen a second ago between subject and object wasn’t there anymore, it banged shut in a fast wash of adrenaline. Amazing, unbelievable, guys who’d played a lot of hard sports said they’d never felt anything like it, the sudden drop and rocket rush of the hit, the reserves of adrenaline you could make available to yourself, pumping it up and putting it out until you were lost floating in it, not afraid, almost open to clear orgasmic death-by-drowning in it, actually relaxed. Unless of course you’d shit your pants or were screaming or praying or giving anything at all to the hundred-channel panic that blew word salad all around you and sometimes clean through you. Maybe you couldn’t love the war and hate it inside the same instant, but sometimes those feelings alternated so rapidly that they spun together in a strobic wheel rolling all the way up until you were literally High On War, like it said on all the helmet covers. Coming off a jag like that could really make a mess out of you.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 63</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;So you learned about fear, it was hard to know what you really learned about courage. How many times did somebody have to run in front of a machine gun before it became an act of cowardice? What about those acts that didn’t require courage to perform, but made you a coward if you didn’t? It was hard to know at the moment, easy to make a mistake when it came, like the mistake of thinking that all you needed to perform a witness act were your eyes. A lot of what people called courage was only undifferentiated energy cut loose by the intensity of the moment, mind loss that sent the actor on an incredible run; if he survived it he had the chance later to decide whether he’d really been brave or just overcome with life, even ecstasy. A lot of people found the guts to just call it all off and refuse to ever go out anymore, they turned and submitted to the penalty end of the system or they just split. A lot of reporters, too, I had friends in the press corps who went out once or twice and then never again. Sometimes I thought that they were the sanest, most serious people of all, although to be honest I never said so until my time there was almost over.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 66</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Vietnam was a dark room full of deadly objects, the VC were everywhere all at once like spider cancer, and instead of losing the war in little pieces over years we lost it fast in under a week. After that, we were like the character in pop grunt mythology, dead but too dumb to lie down.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 71</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;We took space back quickly, expensively, with total panic and close to maximum brutality. Our machine was devastating. And versatile. It could do everything but stop.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 71</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;was on one of those days that I realized that the only corpse I couldn’t bear to look at would be the one I would never have to see.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 77</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The inside of the dining room was freezing with air-conditioning. I sat at a table and ordered a hamburger and a brandy from one of the peasant girls who waited tables. I sat there for a couple of hours and ordered four more hamburgers and at least a dozen brandies. It wasn’t possible, just not possible, to have been where we’d been before and to be where we were now, all in the same afternoon.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 80</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The large bronze urns were dented beyond restoring, and the rain poured through a hole in the roof of the throne room, soaking the two small thrones where the old Annamese royalty had sat. In the great hall (great once you’d scaled it to the Vietnamese) the red lacquer work on the upper walls was badly chipped, and a heavy dust covered everything. The crown of the main gate had collapsed, and in the garden the broken branches of the old cay-dai trees lay like the forms of giant insects seared in a fire, wispy, delicate, dead. It was rumored during those days that the Palace was being held by a unit of student volunteers who had taken the invasion of Hue as a sign and had rushed to join the North Vietnamese.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 84</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Tactically, its value to the Command was thought so great that General Westmoreland could announce that the Tet Offensive was merely Phase II of a brilliant Giap strategy. Phase I had been revealed in the autumn skirmishes between Loc Ninh and Dak To. Phase III (“the capstone,” the general called it) was to be Khe Sanh. It seems impossible that anyone, at any time, even in the chaos of Tet, could have actually called something as monumental (and decisive?) as that offensive a mere diversion for something as negligible as Khe Sanh, but all of that is on record.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 104</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Or did it get born in those same Pentagon rooms where six years of failure had made the air bad, where optimism no longer sprang from anything viable but sprang and sprang, all the way to Saigon, where it was packaged and shipped north to give the grunts some kind of reason for what was about to happen to them?&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 107</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The C-47 was a standard prop flareship, but many of them carried .20- and .762-mm. guns on their doors, Mike-Mikes that could fire out 300 rounds per second, Gatling style, “a round in every square inch of a football field in less than a minute,” as the handouts said. They used to call it Puff the Magic Dragon, but the Marines knew better: they named it Spooky. Every fifth round fired was a tracer, and when Spooky was working, everything stopped while that solid stream of violent red poured down out of the black sky. If you watched from a great distance, the stream would seem to dry up between bursts, vanishing slowly from air to ground like a comet tail, the sound of the guns disappearing too, a few seconds later. If you watched at a close range, you couldn’t believe that anyone would have the courage to deal with that night after night, week after week, and you cultivated a respect for the Viet Cong and NVA who had crouched under it every night now for months. It was awesome, worse than anything the Lord had ever put down on Egypt, and at night, you’d hear the Marines talking, watching it, yelling, “Get some!” until they grew quiet and someone would say, “Spooky understands.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 132</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;We never announced a scorched-earth policy; we never announced any policy at all, apart from finding and destroying the enemy, and we proceeded in the most obvious way. We used what was at hand, dropping the greatest volume of explosives in the history of warfare over all the terrain within the thirty-mile sector which fanned out from Khe Sanh. Employing saturation-bombing techniques, we delivered more than 110,000 tons of bombs to those hills during the eleven-week containment of Khe Sanh. The smaller foothills were often quite literally turned inside out, the steeper of them were made faceless and drawless, and the bigger hills were left with scars and craters of such proportions that an observer from some remote culture might see in them the obsessiveness and ritual regularity of religious symbols, the blackness at the deep center pouring out rays of bright, overturned earth all the way to the circumference; forms like Aztec sun figures, suggesting that their makers had been men who held Nature in an awesome reverence.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 153</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;“No more boom-boom for that mamma-san,” the Marine said, that same, tired remark you heard every time the dead turned out to be women. It was so routine that I don’t think he even realized that he’d said it.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 199</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;We thought at first that he was dead, taken off by a booby trap on the trail, but his color was much too awful for that. Even the dead held some horrible light that seemed to recede, vanishing through one layer of skin at a time and taking a long time to go completely, but this kid had no color about him anywhere. It was incredible that anything so motionless and white could still be alive.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 202</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;And always, they would ask you with an emotion whose intensity would shock you to please tell it, because they really did have the feeling that it wasn’t being told for them, that they were going through all of this and that somehow no one back in the World knew about it. They may have been a bunch of dumb, brutal killer kids (a lot of correspondents privately felt that), but they were smart enough to know that much.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 206</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;What a time they were having there, it had all broken down, one battalion had taken 60 percent casualties, all the original NCO’s were gone, the grunts were telling their officers to go die, to go fuck themselves, to go find some other fools to run up those streets awhile,&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 207</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;At first, I got it all mixed up, I didn’t understand and I felt sorry for myself, misjudged. “Well fuck you too,” I’d think. “It could have been me just as easily, I take chances too, can’t you see that?” And then I realized that that was exactly what it was all about, it explained itself as easily as that, another of the war’s dark revelations. They weren’t judging me, they weren’t reproaching me, they didn’t even mind me, not in any personal way. They only hated me, hated me the way you’d hate any hopeless fool who would put himself through this thing when he had choices, any fool who had no more need of his life than to play with it in this way.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 208</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;I keep thinking about all the kids who got wiped out by seventeen years of war movies before coming to Vietnam to get wiped out for good. You don’t know what a media freak is until you’ve seen the way a few of those grunts would run around during a fight when they knew that there was a television crew nearby; they were actually making war movies in their heads, doing little guts-and-glory Leatherneck tap dances under fire, getting their pimples shot off for the networks. They were insane, but the war hadn’t done that to them.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 209</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Because they worked in the news media, for organizations that were ultimately reverential toward the institutions involved: the Office of the President, the Military, America at war and, most of all, the empty technology that characterized Vietnam. There is no way of remembering good friends without remembering the incredible demands put on them from offices thousands of miles away.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 214</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Except to pick up my mail and get my accreditation renewed, I never had to frequent JUSPAO unless I wanted to. (That office had been created to handle press relations and psychological warfare, and I never met anyone there who seemed to realize that there was a difference.)&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 216</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;(A Paris-Match photograph showed Flynn and a French photographer carrying him on a door, his face half covered by bandages, “Tim Page, blessé à la tête.”)&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 237</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;He was broke, so friends got him a place to sleep, gave him piastres, cigarettes, liquor, grass. Then he made a couple of thousand dollars on some fine pictures of the Offensive, and all of those things came back on us, twice over. That was the way the world was for Page; when he was broke you took care of him, when he was not he took care of you. It was above economics.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 238</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Some guys come back and see their nightmares break in the streets in daylight, some become inhabited and stay that way, all kinds of things can trail after you, and besides, after a while my thing went away almost completely, the dream, too. I know a guy who had been a combat medic in the Central Highlands, and two years later he was still sleeping with all the lights on. We were walking across 57th Street one afternoon and passed a blind man carrying a sign that read, MY DAYS ARE DARKER THAN YOUR NIGHTS. “Don’t bet on it, man,” the ex-medic said.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 244</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Page gave me a small ball of opium to eat on the flight back; stoned dreaming through Wake, Honolulu, San Francisco, New York and the hallucination of home. Opium space, a big round O, and time outside of time, a trip that happened in seconds and over years; Asian time, American space, not clear whether Vietnam was east or west of center, behind me or somehow still ahead.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 250</div></div>      </div>
      </div>
        <div class="footer">
    <div class="footer-data"><div class="footer-links"><ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/contact.php" title="">Contact</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/support.php" title="">Support</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/privacy.php" title="">Privacy</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/rights.php" title="">Rights</a></li></ul></div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="copyright">Copyright (c) 1999-2026 earthli.com. All Rights Reserved.</div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="versions">Powered by <ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore/app_news.php">earthli News 3.7</a></li><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore" title="">earthli WebCore&trade; 3.7</a></li></ul></div></div>    </div>
      </div>
  </div>  </body>
</html>
]]>
  </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
      <title type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[On the Beach by Nevil Shute (1957) (read in 2018)]]>
  </title>
    <id>https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3565</id>
    <link href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3565"/>
    <updated>2018-09-01T16:26:59+02:00</updated>
    <author>
        <name type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[Marco von Ballmoos]]>
  </name>
      <uri>https://earthli.com/users/marco</uri>
    </author>
      <summary type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<blockquote class="quote abstract "><div>Disclaimer: these are notes I took while reading this book. They include citations I found interesting or enlightening or particularly well-written. In some cases, I&rsquo;ve pointed out which of these applies to which citation; in others, I have not. Any benefit you gain from reading these notes is... [<a class="complete-text-link" href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3565">More</a>]</div></blockquote>]]>
  </summary>
      <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<html lang="en">
  <head>
    <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/themes/ice.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/fonts/raleway.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/core/medium.css">
  </head>
  <body>
<div class="style-controls">  <div class="page">
    <div class="page-body">
<div class="info-box-top">
<p>
Published by <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_user.php?name=marco" title="Marco von Ballmoos" class="visible">marco</a> on <span class="date-time">1. Sep 2018 16:26:59 (GMT-5)</span>
</p>
</div>
      <div class="text-flow wide">
  <blockquote class="quote abstract "><div>Disclaimer: these are notes I took while reading this book. They include citations I found interesting or enlightening or particularly well-written. In some cases, I&rsquo;ve pointed out which of these applies to which citation; in others, I have not. Any benefit you gain from reading these notes is purely incidental to the purpose they serve of reminding me what I once read. Please see Wikipedia for a summary if I&rsquo;ve failed to provide one sufficient for your purposes. If my notes serve to trigger an interest in this book, then I&rsquo;m happy for you.</div></blockquote><p>A nuclear conflagration has engulfed the world. In the aftermath, it&rsquo;s not clear who started it or who even fought on which side. Stories differ. There is the officially accepted truth—something to do with the Russians, the Chinese and the Americans. And then there are other theories that bubble up as we meet more people. All that is clear is that the entire northern hemisphere is gone. There is an inexorable radioactive cloud creeping southward at a predictable pace. Cities go dark, day by day.</p>
<p>The story takes place in Australia, centered on sailor Peter Holmes in the Australian navy, an entity that has all but ceased to exist. An American submarine lands on the shores of Melbourne. Peter befriends the caption of the vessel, Commander Towers. Although there are breaks with customs and morals, many of the people stick to their lives as they were. Until they&rsquo;re not anymore. The end.</p>
<p>There is a fuel shortage (of course) and the scope of life contracts back to earlier times, humanity slowly fading into oblivion with barely a whimper. Many take their own lives with government-provided pills. The submarine goes on several missions, but discovers nothing on the entire planet. It&rsquo;s all dead. There is no reprieve. There is no happy ending for humanity. The Earth has been boiled free of life—not instantly, but definitely.</p>
<h2>Citations</h2><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;These bloody women, sheltered from realities, living in a sentimental dream world of their own! If they’d face up to things they could help a man, help him enormously. While they clung to the dream world they were just a bloody millstone round his neck.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 104</div></div><p>This, in a world whose cruelty was guaranteed by men.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Very soon, perhaps in a month’s time, there would be no one here, no living creatures but the cats and dogs that had been granted a short reprieve. Soon they too would be gone; summers and winters would pass by and these houses and these streets would know them. Presently, as time passed, the radioactivity would pass also; with a cobalt half-life of about five years these streets and houses would be habitable again in twenty years at the latest, and probably much sooner than that. The human race was to be wiped out and the world made clean again for wiser occupants without undue delay. Well, probably that made sense.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 173</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;In the bedroom he found his mother lying on her back with her eyes closed, the bed very neat and tidy. He moved a little closer and touched her hand, but she was dead. On the table by her side was a glass of water, a pencilled note, and one of the little red cartons, open, with the empty vial beside it. He had not known that she had that. He picked up the note. It read, My dear son, It’s quite absurd that I should spoil the last days of your life by hanging on to mine, since it is such a burden to me now. Don’t bother about any funeral. Just close the door and leave me in my own bed, in my own room, with my own things all round me. I shall be quite all right. Do whatever you think best for little Ming. I am so very, very sorry for him, but I can do nothing. I am so very glad you won your race. My very dearest love. MOTHER.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 185</div></div><p>The race to which she refers is an all-out, no-holds-barred, super-dangerous race in which George Osborne took part. George is the scientist/engineer who refurbished a race car and, along with other enthusiasts, took part in a world-championship race. He won, nearly by default, because he was one of the only ones to survive. Ming is his mother&rsquo;s dog.</p>
      </div>
      </div>
        <div class="footer">
    <div class="footer-data"><div class="footer-links"><ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/contact.php" title="">Contact</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/support.php" title="">Support</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/privacy.php" title="">Privacy</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/rights.php" title="">Rights</a></li></ul></div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="copyright">Copyright (c) 1999-2026 earthli.com. All Rights Reserved.</div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="versions">Powered by <ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore/app_news.php">earthli News 3.7</a></li><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore" title="">earthli WebCore&trade; 3.7</a></li></ul></div></div>    </div>
      </div>
  </div>  </body>
</html>
]]>
  </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
      <title type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[The Lathe of Heaven by Ursula K. Le Guin (1971) (read in 2018)]]>
  </title>
    <id>https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3564</id>
    <link href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3564"/>
    <updated>2018-09-01T16:06:44+02:00</updated>
    <author>
        <name type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[Marco von Ballmoos]]>
  </name>
      <uri>https://earthli.com/users/marco</uri>
    </author>
      <summary type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<blockquote class="quote abstract "><div>Disclaimer: these are notes I took while reading this book. They include citations I found interesting or enlightening or particularly well-written. In some cases, I&rsquo;ve pointed out which of these applies to which citation; in others, I have not. Any benefit you gain from reading these notes is... [<a class="complete-text-link" href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3564">More</a>]</div></blockquote>]]>
  </summary>
      <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<html lang="en">
  <head>
    <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/themes/ice.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/fonts/raleway.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/core/medium.css">
  </head>
  <body>
<div class="style-controls">  <div class="page">
    <div class="page-body">
<div class="info-box-top">
<p>
Published by <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_user.php?name=marco" title="Marco von Ballmoos" class="visible">marco</a> on <span class="date-time">1. Sep 2018 16:06:44 (GMT-5)</span>
</p>
</div>
      <div class="text-flow wide">
  <blockquote class="quote abstract "><div>Disclaimer: these are notes I took while reading this book. They include citations I found interesting or enlightening or particularly well-written. In some cases, I&rsquo;ve pointed out which of these applies to which citation; in others, I have not. Any benefit you gain from reading these notes is purely incidental to the purpose they serve of reminding me what I once read. Please see Wikipedia for a summary if I&rsquo;ve failed to provide one sufficient for your purposes. If my notes serve to trigger an interest in this book, then I&rsquo;m happy for you.</div></blockquote><p>This is the story of George Orr, a man whose dreams change reality. He lives in a world where he&rsquo;s required to visit a psychiatrist to address his affliction. Soon, though, the world no longer requires him to do so—because his psychiatrist is manipulating him into changing the world to the doctor&rsquo;s benefit. Orr&rsquo;s effective dreams are not without side-effects—anyone who lives through one ends up with multiple memories, remembering both the way the world was and also the way the world is (including the history leading up to the world in which they now live). Doctor Haber invents a machine called the Augmentor that focuses Orr&rsquo;s power.</p>
<p>Orr&rsquo;s dreams don&rsquo;t change reality so much as shift himself and those around him into different timelines. Eventually, he chooses a timeline in which aliens invade the planet—ostensibly with the goal of finding him, the one capable of bending reality. The aliens don&rsquo;t try to stop so much as try to get him to control himself, to get out from under Dr. Haber&rsquo;s thumb. Orr is OK, but Haber is dangerous.</p>
<p>Philip K. Dick worked very much in this vein, where the line between observed and actual reality is blurred into nothingness. The story is a mix of various potential realities, composed of the dreams of Haber and Orr as well as strands of the original reality. Read the <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Lathe_of_Heaven">Wikipedia article</a> for a more in-depth description of the plot.</p>
<h2>Citations</h2><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Those whom heaven helps we call the sons of heaven. They do not learn this by learning. They do not work it by working. They do not reason it by using reason. To let understanding stop at what cannot be understood is a high attainment. Those who cannot do it will be destroyed on the lathe of heaven. — CHUANG TSE : XXIII&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 26</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;There were nine train and truck tunnels under the Willamette, sixteen bridges across it, and concrete banks along it for twenty-seven miles. Flood control on both it and its great confluent the Columbia, a few miles downstream from central Portland, was so highly developed that neither river could rise more than five inches even after the most prolonged torrential rains. The Willamette was a useful element of the environment, like a very large, docile draft animal harnessed with straps, chains, shafts, saddles, bits, girths, hobbles. If it hadn’t been useful, of course it would have been concreted over, like the hundreds of little creeks and streams that ran in darkness down from the hills of the city under the streets and buildings.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 37</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Above the heads of those now riding the GPRT train in the Broadway Tunnel were tons of rock and gravel, tons of water running, the piles of wharves and the keels of ocean-going ships, the huge concrete supports of elevated freeway bridges and approaches, a convoy of steamer trucks laden with frozen battery-produced chickens, one jet plane at 34,000 feet, the stars at 4.3 + light-years.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 37</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Nothing endures, nothing is precise and certain (except the mind of a pedant), perfection is the mere repudiation of that ineluctable marginal inexactitude which is the mysterious inmost quality of Being. — H. G. WELLS, A MODERN UTOPIA&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 41</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Orr stood up, but didn’t head for the door. “Did you ever happen to think, Dr. Haber,” he said, quietly enough but stuttering a little, “that there, there might be other people who dream the way I do? That reality’s being changed out from under us, replaced, renewed, all the time—only we don’t know it? Only the dreamer knows it, and those who know his dream. If that’s true, I guess we’re lucky not knowing it. This is confusing enough.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 71</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Not quite night yet: late twilight on the fields. Clumps of trees looked black and moist. The road he was walking on picked up the faint, last light from the sky; it ran long and straight, an old country highway, cracked blacktop. A goose was walking ahead of him, about fifteen feet in advance and visible only as a white, bobbing blur. Now and then it hissed a little. The stars were coming out, white as daisies. A big one was blooming just to the right of the road, low over the dark country, tremulously white. When he looked up at it again it had already become larger and brighter. It’s enhuging, he thought. It seemed to grow reddish as it brightened. It enreddenhuged. The eyes swam. Small blue-green streaks zipped about it zigzagging Brownian roundianroundian. A vast and creamy halo pulsated about big star and tiny zips, fainter, clearer, pulsing. Oh no no no! he said as the big star brightened hugendly BURST blinding.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 83</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;He never spoke with any bitterness at all, no matter how awful the things he said. Are there really people without resentment, without hate? she wondered. People who never go cross-grained to the universe? Who recognize evil, and resist evil, and yet are utterly unaffected by it? Of course there are. Countless, the living and the dead. Those who have returned in pure compassion to the wheel, those who follow the way that cannot be followed without knowing they follow it, the sharecropper’s wife in Alabama and the lama in Tibet and the entomologist in Peru and the millworker in Odessa and the greengrocer in London and the goatherd in Nigeria and the old, old man sharpening a stick by a dry streambed somewhere in Australia, and all the others. There is not one of us who has not known them. There are enough of them, enough to keep us going. Perhaps.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 100</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;You’ll be the greatest benefactor humanity has ever had in spite of yourself. All the time and energy humans have wasted on trying to find religious solutions to suffering, then you come along and make Buddha and Jesus and the rest of them look like the fakirs they were. They tried to run away from evil, but we, we’re uprooting it—getting rid of it, piece by piece!”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 130</div></div><p>Actually, no, not according to Haber&rsquo;s own theory. If they&rsquo;re just jumping continua, the suffering continues, but they don&rsquo;t live with it. They&rsquo;re just fine-tuning their own experience, changing nothing.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;“I am tired,” he said. “I did a lot today. That is, I did something. The only thing I have ever done. I pressed a button. It took the entire willpower, the accumulated strength of my entire existence, to press one damned OFF button.” “You have lived well,” the Alien said.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 178</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;He lay back. He clearly sensed the pity and protective compassion of the Alien standing across the dark room. It saw him, not with eyes, as short-lived, fleshly, armorless, a strange creature, infinitely vulnerable, adrift in the gulfs of the possible: something that needed help. He didn’t mind. He did need help. Weariness took him over, picked him up like a current of the sea into which he was sinking slowly. “Er’ perrehnne,” he muttered, surrendering to sleep.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 178</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Orr slept. He dreamed. There was no rub. His dreams, like waves of the deep sea far from any shore, came and went, rose and fell, profound and harmless, breaking nowhere, changing nothing. They danced the dance among all the other waves in the sea of being. Through his sleep the great, green sea turtles dived, swimming with heavy, inexhaustible grace through the depths, in their element.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 178</div></div>      </div>
      </div>
        <div class="footer">
    <div class="footer-data"><div class="footer-links"><ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/contact.php" title="">Contact</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/support.php" title="">Support</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/privacy.php" title="">Privacy</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/rights.php" title="">Rights</a></li></ul></div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="copyright">Copyright (c) 1999-2026 earthli.com. All Rights Reserved.</div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="versions">Powered by <ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore/app_news.php">earthli News 3.7</a></li><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore" title="">earthli WebCore&trade; 3.7</a></li></ul></div></div>    </div>
      </div>
  </div>  </body>
</html>
]]>
  </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
      <title type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[Grand Forks: A History of American Dining in 128 Reviews by Marilyn Hagerty (2013) (read in 2018)]]>
  </title>
    <id>https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3563</id>
    <link href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3563"/>
    <updated>2018-09-01T15:31:39+02:00</updated>
    <author>
        <name type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[Marco von Ballmoos]]>
  </name>
      <uri>https://earthli.com/users/marco</uri>
    </author>
      <summary type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<blockquote class="quote abstract "><div>Disclaimer: these are notes I took while reading this book. They include citations I found interesting or enlightening or particularly well-written. In some cases, I&rsquo;ve pointed out which of these applies to which citation; in others, I have not. Any benefit you gain from reading these notes is... [<a class="complete-text-link" href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3563">More</a>]</div></blockquote>]]>
  </summary>
      <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<html lang="en">
  <head>
    <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/themes/ice.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/fonts/raleway.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/core/medium.css">
  </head>
  <body>
<div class="style-controls">  <div class="page">
    <div class="page-body">
<div class="info-box-top">
<p>
Published by <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_user.php?name=marco" title="Marco von Ballmoos" class="visible">marco</a> on <span class="date-time">1. Sep 2018 15:31:39 (GMT-5)</span>
</p>
</div>
      <div class="text-flow wide">
  <blockquote class="quote abstract "><div>Disclaimer: these are notes I took while reading this book. They include citations I found interesting or enlightening or particularly well-written. In some cases, I&rsquo;ve pointed out which of these applies to which citation; in others, I have not. Any benefit you gain from reading these notes is purely incidental to the purpose they serve of reminding me what I once read. Please see Wikipedia for a summary if I&rsquo;ve failed to provide one sufficient for your purposes. If my notes serve to trigger an interest in this book, then I&rsquo;m happy for you.</div></blockquote><p>This is a collection of restaurant reviews from restaurants all over North Dakota, but mostly from the metropolitan region (such as it is) in and around Grand Forks. A couple of the reviews are of top-flight restaurants in New York City, thrown in seemingly to point out that Ms. Hagerty isn&rsquo;t just a country bumpkin.</p>
<p>Her book is refreshingly honest and simple, the reviews eminently useful, concentrating as they do on describing decor, menu and prices. She weaves stories of the proprietor&rsquo;s lives into her reviews. Through these, we follow how the city of Grand Forks grew over the years. The reviews start in the 80s and continue into the first decade of the 21st century. We also see how expectations of price and quality grew over the years—and how some restaurants managed to remain focused on providing quality food for what seems likely nearly impossible prices for the time.</p>
<p>There was a bit of monotony to the reviews, a bit of ritual, but not of boredom, necessarily. Almost like a book of zen koans, delivered by a woman seemingly without malice. Almost like listening to a song by a favorite band that sounds very much like all of the other songs that band has made—it&rsquo;s nice to listen to, even though familiar.</p>
<p>I imagine that Marilyn&rsquo;s reviews served over the years as a bulwark against ugly reality for many residents.</p>
<p>I discovered this book when Anthony Bourdain died: someone I read had mentioned that he&rsquo;d written the foreword to Marilyn&rsquo;s book. His foreword is nicely written and generous and reveals a man capable of appreciating the simpler things, just like Marilyn. Appropriately, it is overshadowed by the simple power of Ms. Hagerty&rsquo;s reviews.</p>
<h2>Citations</h2><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;When CC showed up, he ordered the breakfast special […]&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 33</div></div><p>CC is &ldquo;Constant Companion&rdquo; whose constancy is a bit optimistic. Somewhere near the middle of the book, we no longer hear of him and his adorable predilections for normal food. Whether he left or died is not mentioned, nor very important to the book. At this point, Marilyn started eating with groups of friends—and the level of restaurant that she started to visit increased as well.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;[…] fond farewell when you visit the new Red Lobster restaurant. And to visit there is rather […]&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 87</div></div><p>Marilyn wrote about all places equally: a decent-quality seafood restaurant in Grand Forks was well-worth a visit, even though it was a chain restaurant.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;I remembered one of the sayings on the Kaffe Huset menu. “Det kjelper life a skynde seg nor man er pa gal vei.” In other words, “It doesn’t pay to hurry when you are on the wrong road.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 106</div></div><p>The Scandinavian character of the northern midwest of America shines through in many of the reviews.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The quesadilla also was mildly flavored with a pleasing combination of lettuce, green pepper, beef, olives and tomato.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 224</div></div><p>This is typical of Marilyn&rsquo;s reviews of food. She always found something nice to say, even about something as simple as a quesadilla—which she described in detail, knowing that many of her readers wouldn&rsquo;t know what the hell that even was.</p>
<p>You&rsquo;ll also note from the above sentence one of her authorial idiosyncrasies: she refuses to split an infinitive.</p>
      </div>
      </div>
        <div class="footer">
    <div class="footer-data"><div class="footer-links"><ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/contact.php" title="">Contact</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/support.php" title="">Support</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/privacy.php" title="">Privacy</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/rights.php" title="">Rights</a></li></ul></div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="copyright">Copyright (c) 1999-2026 earthli.com. All Rights Reserved.</div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="versions">Powered by <ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore/app_news.php">earthli News 3.7</a></li><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore" title="">earthli WebCore&trade; 3.7</a></li></ul></div></div>    </div>
      </div>
  </div>  </body>
</html>
]]>
  </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
      <title type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[The Forever War by Joe Haldeman (1974) (read in 2018)]]>
  </title>
    <id>https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3532</id>
    <link href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3532"/>
    <updated>2018-04-08T21:23:57+02:00</updated>
    <author>
        <name type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[Marco von Ballmoos]]>
  </name>
      <uri>https://earthli.com/users/marco</uri>
    </author>
      <summary type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<blockquote class="quote abstract "><div>Disclaimer: these are notes I took while reading this book. They include citations I found interesting or enlightening or particularly well-written. In some cases, I&rsquo;ve pointed out which of these applies to which citation; in others, I have not. Any benefit you gain from reading these notes is... [<a class="complete-text-link" href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3532">More</a>]</div></blockquote>]]>
  </summary>
      <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<html lang="en">
  <head>
    <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/themes/ice.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/fonts/raleway.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/core/medium.css">
  </head>
  <body>
<div class="style-controls">  <div class="page">
    <div class="page-body">
<div class="info-box-top">
<p>
Published by <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_user.php?name=marco" title="Marco von Ballmoos" class="visible">marco</a> on <span class="date-time">8. Apr 2018 21:23:57 (GMT-5)</span>
</p>
</div>
      <div class="text-flow wide">
  <blockquote class="quote abstract "><div>Disclaimer: these are notes I took while reading this book. They include citations I found interesting or enlightening or particularly well-written. In some cases, I&rsquo;ve pointed out which of these applies to which citation; in others, I have not. Any benefit you gain from reading these notes is purely incidental to the purpose they serve of reminding me what I once read. Please see Wikipedia for a summary if I&rsquo;ve failed to provide one sufficient for your purposes. If my notes serve to trigger an interest in this book, then I&rsquo;m happy for you.</div></blockquote><p>The parallels between the Forever War and the Vietnam War are not coincidental. This book was written at the tail-end of the Vietnam war by a veteran. In the Forever War, the enemy is an alien race that no-one has ever seen. The war starts with an incident and escalates quickly. There are years between incidents, relativistic limits being what they are. The soldiers are chosen from the best and the brightest—the elite scientists and minds of the current generation.</p>
<p>The story touches on many topics that would be covered again and again in subsequent novels, but which were featured first in this book. The population of Earth turns to homosexuality as a form of population control, the soldiers sent off to war experience jarring shifts in the culture to which they return—just like Vietnam veterans did—but in the Forever War, it&rsquo;s due to extreme time-dilation effects from their relativistic flights to their battlegrounds.</p>
<p>Haldeman conjectures that any given battle between humans and the Taurans could go either way because it was never clear which side was more advanced in any given confrontation. Because of relativistic travel times, it was possible for there to be nearly a century of additional scientific and military development between them.</p>
<p>Haldeman also likens what it would be like to return to Earth after many decades to the feeling of disjuncture experienced by any war veterans. What&rsquo;s the point of fighting at all when the homeland can barely remember that there&rsquo;s a war on at all? Why not run away when no-one can prove that you did? He discusses how language and culture shifts so much that returning soldiers need translators for both language and customs.</p>
<p>During the final battle, I was convinced that the Taurans didn&rsquo;t actually exist and that humans had actually been fighting themselves all along—just separated across relativistic time. This turned out not to be the case—instead the Taurans and the humans of the future have more in common with each other than the human soldiers of the past. The humans of the future become a hive-mind—just like the Taurans were all along.</p>
<h2>Citations</h2><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;‘One cannot make command decisions simply by assessing the tactical situation and going ahead with whatever course of action will do the most harm to the enemy with a minimum of death and damage to your own men and material.</p>
<p>&ldquo;Modern warfare has become very complex, especially during the last century. Wars are won not by a simple series of battles won, but by a complex interrelationship among military victory, economic pressures, logistic maneuvering, access to the enemy’s information, political postures — dozens, literally dozens of factors.’&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 106</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Relativity traps us in the enemy’s past; relativity brings them from our future. We can only hope that next time, the situation will be reversed.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 105</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Doctors don’t seem to realize that most of us are perfectly content not having to visualize ourselves as animated bags of skin filled with obscene glop.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 108</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;And in the past, people whose country was at war were constantly in contact with the war. The newspapers would be full of reports, veterans would return from the front; sometimes the front would move right into town, invaders marching down Main Street or bombs whistling through the night air — but always the sense of either working toward victory or at least delaying defeat.</p>
<p>&ldquo;The enemy was a tangible thing, a propagandist’s monster whom you could understand, whom you could hate. But this war … the enemy was a curious organism only vaguely understood, more often the subject of cartoons than nightmares.&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 138</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;I wouldn’t know a potato or green bean plant if it stood up and took a bite out of my ankle, but I knew how to walk a half-meter step. So I resolved to count to 3800 and take a deep breath. I supposed I could tell the difference between the smell of chicken manure and the absence thereof.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 147</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;We sat there for some time, not touching the exquisite food, ignoring the beauty around us and beneath us, only conscious of each other and the two sheets of paper that separated us with a gulf as wide and real as death.</p>
<p>&ldquo;We went back to Threshold. I protested but my arguments were shrugged off. I tried to get Marygay assigned to my company, as my exec. They said my personnel had all been allotted. I pointed out that most of them probably hadn’t even been born yet.</p>
<p>&ldquo;Nevertheless, allotted, they said. It would be almost a century, I said, before I even get to Stargate. They replied that Strike Force Command plans in terms of centuries. Not in terms of people.</p>
<p>&ldquo;We had a day and a night together. The less said about that, the better. It wasn’t just losing a lover. Marygay and I were each other’s only link to real life, the Earth of the 1980s and 90s. Not the perverse grotesquerie we were supposedly fighting to preserve. When her shuttle took off it was like a casket rattling down into a grave.&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 177</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;‘Surviving is a virtue in a private.’ Couldn’t resist it. ‘But an officer should provide gallant example. Go down with the ship. Stride the parapet as if unafraid.’&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 187</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;A few lucky souls, about one in eight thousand, are invited to volunteer for combat training. Refusing is ‘sociopathic,’ even though it means signing up for an extra five years. And your chance of surviving the ten years is so small as to be negligible; nobody ever had.</p>
<p>&ldquo;Your best chance is to have the war end before your ten (subjective) years of service are up. Hope that time dilation puts many years between each of your battles. Since you can figure on going into battle roughly once every subjective year, and since an average of 34 percent survive each battle, it’s easy to compute your chances of being able to fight it out for ten years.</p>
<p>&ldquo;It comes to about two one-thousandths of one percent. Or, to put it another way, get an old-fashioned six-shooter and play Russian Roulette with four of the six chambers loaded. If you can do it ten times in a row without decorating the opposite wall, congratulations! You’re a civilian.&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 191</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;‘Our voyage will require four collapsar jumps and will last some four months, subjective. Maneuvering into collapsar insertion will put us about three hundred years behind Stargate’s calendar by the time we reach Sade-138.’ And another seven hundred years gone, if I lived to return. Not that it would make that much difference; Marygay was as good as dead and there wasn’t another person alive who meant anything to me.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 196</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;‘The idea was to keep people from making babies the biological way. Because, A, people showed a regrettable lack of sense in choosing their genetic partner. And B, the Council saw that racial differences had an unnecessarily divisive effect on humanity; with total control over births, they could make everybody the same race in a few generations.’&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 197</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;She cracked the capsule under her nose and took two deep breaths. ‘As a woman, though, I’m all in favor of it.’</p>
<p>&ldquo;Hilleboe and Rusk nodded vigorously. ‘Not having to go through childbirth?’ </p>
<p>&ldquo;‘That’s part of it.’ She crossed her eyes comically, looking at the capsule, gave it a final sniff. ‘Mostly, though, it’s not … having to … have a man. Inside me. You understand. It’s disgusting.’</p>
<p>&ldquo;Moore laughed. ‘If you haven’t tried it, Diana, don’t—’ ‘Oh, shut up.’ She threw the empty capsule at him playfully.</p>
<p>&ldquo;‘But it’s perfectly natural,’ I protested.</p>
<p>&ldquo;‘So is swinging through trees. Digging for roots with a blunt stick. Progress, my good major; progress.’</p>
<p>&ldquo;‘Anyway,’ Moore said, ‘it was only a crime for a short period. Then it was considered a, oh, curable …’</p>
<p>&ldquo;‘Dysfunction,’ Alsever said. ‘Thank you. And now, well, it’s so rare … I doubt that any of the men and women have any strong feelings about it, one way or the other.’</p>
<p>&ldquo;‘Just an eccentricity,’ Diana said, magnanimously. ‘Not as if you ate babies.’&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 198</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;‘It’s not as though we’d be actually lost,’ he said with a rather wicked expression. ‘We could zip up in the tanks, aim for Earth and blast away at full power. We’d get there in about three months, ship time.’ </p>
<p>&ldquo;‘Sure,’ I said. ‘But 150,000 years in the future.’ At twenty-five gees, you get to nine-tenths the speed of light in less than a month. From then on, you’re in the arms of Saint Albert.&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 203</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;It made you wonder how many soldiers had gotten out of the war in just that way. There were forty-two strike forces lost somewhere and unaccounted for. It was possible that all of them were crawling through normal space at near-lightspeed and would show up at Earth or Stargate one-by-one over the centuries.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 203</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;Most of them either had English as their native tongue or as a second language, but it had changed so drastically over 450 years that I could barely understand it, not at all if it was spoken rapidly. </p>
<p>&ldquo;Fortunately, they had all been taught early twenty-first century English during their basic training; that language, or dialect, served as a temporal lingua franca through which a twenty-fifth century soldier could communicate with someone who had been a contemporary of his nineteen-times-great-grandparents&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 213</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;My duties were more varied but offered little satisfaction, since the problems that percolated up to me were of the ‘the buck stops here’ type; those with pleasing, unambiguous solutions were taken care of in the lower echelons.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 224</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Evidently the Taurans had the same problem — or they had copied the process from us in the first place — because they had also scaled down to nova bombs that used less than a hundred kilograms of degenerate matter. And they deployed them much the same way we did, the warhead separating into dozens of pieces as it approached the target, only one of which was the nova bomb.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 232</div></div><p>We have met the enemy and they are us. Here is where I suspected that, due to relativistic effects, we were fighting ourselves—or perhaps Marygay? </p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;The Taurans hadn’t known war for millennia, and toward the beginning of the twenty-first century it looked as though mankind was ready to outgrow the institution as well.</p>
<p>&ldquo;But the old soldiers were still around, and many of them were in positions of power. They virtually ran the United Nations Exploratory and Colonization Group, that was taking advantage of the newly-discovered collapsar jump to explore interstellar space.</p>
<p>&ldquo;Many of the early ships met with accidents and disappeared. The ex-military men were suspicious. They armed the colonizing vessels, and the first time they met a Tauran ship, they blasted it. They dusted off their medals and the rest was going to be history.</p>
<p>&ldquo;You couldn’t blame it all on the military, though. The evidence they presented for the Taurans’ having been responsible for the earlier casualties was laughably thin. The few people who pointed this out were ignored. The fact was, Earth’s economy needed a war, and this one was ideal. It gave a nice hole to throw buckets of money into, but would unify humanity rather than dividing it.&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 261</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;It took all of my money, and all the money of five other old-timers, but we bought a cruiser from UNEF. And we’re using it as a time machine. So I’m on a relativistic shuttle, waiting for you.</p>
<p>&ldquo;All it does is go out five light years and come back to Middle Finger, very fast. Every ten years I age about a month. So if you’re on schedule and still alive, I’ll only be twenty-eight when you get here.</p>
<p>&ldquo;Hurry! I never found anybody else and I don’t want anybody else. I don’t care whether you’re ninety years old or thirty. If I can’t be your lover, I’ll be your nurse.&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 264</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;If you had friends or lovers lost in the relativistic maze of the Forever War, you could wait for them on the Time Warp, a converted battlewagon that shuttled back and forth between Mizar and Alcor fast enough to almost halt aging.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 265</div></div>      </div>
      </div>
        <div class="footer">
    <div class="footer-data"><div class="footer-links"><ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/contact.php" title="">Contact</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/support.php" title="">Support</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/privacy.php" title="">Privacy</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/rights.php" title="">Rights</a></li></ul></div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="copyright">Copyright (c) 1999-2026 earthli.com. All Rights Reserved.</div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="versions">Powered by <ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore/app_news.php">earthli News 3.7</a></li><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore" title="">earthli WebCore&trade; 3.7</a></li></ul></div></div>    </div>
      </div>
  </div>  </body>
</html>
]]>
  </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
      <title type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[Ten Days That Shook The World by John Reed (1919) (read in 2018)]]>
  </title>
    <id>https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3530</id>
    <link href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3530"/>
    <updated>2018-04-08T20:55:39+02:00</updated>
    <author>
        <name type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[Marco von Ballmoos]]>
  </name>
      <uri>https://earthli.com/users/marco</uri>
    </author>
      <summary type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<blockquote class="quote abstract "><div>Disclaimer: these are notes I took while reading this book. They include citations I found interesting or enlightening or particularly well-written. In some cases, I&rsquo;ve pointed out which of these applies to which citation; in others, I have not. Any benefit you gain from reading these notes is... [<a class="complete-text-link" href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3530">More</a>]</div></blockquote>]]>
  </summary>
      <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<html lang="en">
  <head>
    <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/themes/ice.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/fonts/raleway.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/core/medium.css">
  </head>
  <body>
<div class="style-controls">  <div class="page">
    <div class="page-body">
<div class="info-box-top">
<p>
Published by <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_user.php?name=marco" title="Marco von Ballmoos" class="visible">marco</a> on <span class="date-time">8. Apr 2018 20:55:39 (GMT-5)</span>
</p>
</div>
      <div class="text-flow wide">
  <blockquote class="quote abstract "><div>Disclaimer: these are notes I took while reading this book. They include citations I found interesting or enlightening or particularly well-written. In some cases, I&rsquo;ve pointed out which of these applies to which citation; in others, I have not. Any benefit you gain from reading these notes is purely incidental to the purpose they serve of reminding me what I once read. Please see Wikipedia for a summary if I&rsquo;ve failed to provide one sufficient for your purposes. If my notes serve to trigger an interest in this book, then I&rsquo;m happy for you.</div></blockquote><p>This is a first-hand account of the ten days prior to and just after the Russian Revolution in November of 1917, John Reed was living in St. Petersburg as things got into full swing. He was a strongly left-leaning journalist with at least a partial grasp of the Russian language, though it&rsquo;s unclear how well he could read it. It&rsquo;s hard to believe that he didn&rsquo;t understand any of it, considering how much of the book seems to have been transcribed from meetings or conversations in the street.</p>
<p>The book offers an enthusiastic and detailed account of the involvement of the myriad participants and factions. The book covers many of the intrigues between factions involved in the revolutions as well as the external pressures of the other nations of Europe—Finland, England, Germany and others. These were trying from the very beginning to extinguish the Bolshevik revolution that they saw as an infectious threat to all that they&rsquo;d taken for themselves.</p>
<p>The Russian refusal to continue fighting alongside the other nations in WWI, throwing away its young men&rsquo;s lives for the capitalists, was the final straw: they had to be eliminated before they were allowed to show that another way was possible. Internal forces—particularly in the person of Yussov Djugashvili-Stalin took care of the rest.</p>
<h2>Citations</h2><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;On October 15th I had a conversation with a great Russian capitalist, Stepan Georgevitch Lianozov, known as the &ldquo;Russian Rockefeller&rdquo;-a Cadet by political faith. &ldquo;Revolution,&rdquo; he said, &ldquo;is a sickness. Sooner or later the foreign powers must intervene here-as one would intervene to cure a sick child, and teach it how to walk. Of course it would be more or less improper, but the nations must realize the danger of Bolshevism in their own countries-such contagious ideas as &lsquo;proletarian dictatorship,&rsquo; and &lsquo;world social revolution&rsquo;… There is a chance that this intervention may not be necessary. Transportation is demoralized, the factories are closing down, and the Germans are advancing. Starvation and defeat may bring the Russian people to their senses….&rdquo;&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 4</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;As in all such times, the petty conventional life of the city went on, ignoring the Revolution as much as possible. The poets made verses-but not about the Revolution. The realistic painters painted scenes from medieval Russian history-anything but the Revolution. Young ladies from the provinces came up to the capital to learn French and cultivate their voices, and the gay young beautiful officers wore their gold-trimmed crimson bashliki and their elaborate Caucasian swords around the hotel lobbies. The ladies of the minor bureaucratic set took tea with each other in the afternoon, carrying each her little gold or silver or jewelled sugar-box, and half a loaf of bread in her muff, and wished that the Tsar were back, or that the Germans would come, or anything that would solve the servant problem…. The daughter of a friend of mine came home one afternoon in hysterics because the woman street-car conductor had called her &ldquo;Comrade!&rdquo;&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 8</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;"Comrades,&ldquo; he cried, and there was real anguish in his drawn face and despairing gestures. &ldquo;The people at the top are always calling upon us to sacrifice more, sacrifice more, while those who have everything are left unmolested. &ldquo;We are at war with Germany. Would we invite German generals to serve on our Staff? Well we&rsquo;re at war with the capitalists too, and yet we invite them into our Government…. &ldquo;The soldier says, &lsquo;Show me what I am fighting for. Is it Constantinople, or is it free Russia? Is it the democracy, or is it the capitalist plunderers? If you can prove to me that I am defending the Revolution then I&rsquo;ll go out and fight without capital punishment to force me.&lsquo;&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 13</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;At once every one began asking me questions about America: Was it true that people in a free country sold their votes for money? If so, how did they get what they wanted? How about this &ldquo;Tammany&rdquo;? Was it true that in a free country a little group of people could control a whole city, and exploited it for their personal benefit? Why did the people stand it? Even under the Tsar such things could not happen in Russia; true, here there was always graft, but to buy and sell a whole city full of people! And in a free country! Had the people no revolutionary feeling? I tried to explain that in my country people tried to change things by law. &ldquo;Of course,&rdquo; nodded a young sergeant, named Baklanov, who spoke French. &ldquo;But you have a highly developed capitalist class? Then the capitalist class must control the legislatures and the courts. How then can the people change things? I am open to conviction, for I do not know your country; but to me it is incredible….&rdquo;&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 139</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;A couch lay along the wall, and on this was stretched a young workman. Two Red Guards were bending over him, but the rest of the company did not pay any attention. In his breast was a hole; through his clothes fresh blood came welling up with every heart-beat. His eyes were closed and his young, bearded face was greenish-white. Faintly and slowly he still breathed, with every breath sighing, &ldquo;Mir boudit! Mir boudit! (Peace is coming! Peace is coming!)&rdquo;&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 141</div></div><p>These scenes remind me of <a href="https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0091251/">Idi i smotri</a> (<cite><a href="http://www.imdb.com/">IMDb</a></cite>).</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;"You foreigners look down on us Russians because so long we tolerated a mediæval monarchy,&ldquo; said he. &ldquo;But we saw that the Tsar was not the only tyrant in the world; capitalism was worse, and in all the countries of the world capitalism was Emperor…. Russian revolutionary tactics are best….&rdquo;&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 154</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Executing the will of these Congresses, the Council of People&rsquo;s Commissars has resolved to establish as a basis for its activity in the question of Nationalities, the following principles: (1) The equality and sovereignty of the peoples of Russia. (2) The right of the peoples of Russia to free self-determination, even to the point of separation and the formation of an independent state. (3) The abolition of any and all national and national religious privileges and disabilities. (4) The free development of national minorities and ethnographic groups inhabiting the territory of Russia. Decrees will be prepared immediately upon the formation of a Commission on Nationalities. In the name of the Russian Republic, People&rsquo;s Commissar for Nationalities YUSSOV DJUGASHVILI-STALIN President of the Council of People&rsquo;s Commissars V. ULYANOV (LENIN)&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 157</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;the Ministry of Agriculture, the Ministry of Supplies, the Ministry of Finance, similar incidents occurred. And the employees, summoned to return or forfeit their positions and their pensions, either stayed away or returned to sabotage…. Almost all the intelligentsia being anti-Bolshevik, there was nowhere for the Soviet Government to recruit new staffs…. The private banks remained stubbornly closed, with a back door open for speculators. When Bolshevik Commissars entered, the clerks left, secreting the books and removing the funds. All the employees of the State Bank struck except the clerks in charge of the vaults and the manufacture of money, who refused all demands from Smolny and privately paid out huge sums to the Committee for Salvation and the City Duma.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 158</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The opposition newspapers, suppressed one day and reappearing next morning under new names, heaped bitter sarcasm on the new regime. (See App. XI, Sect. 5) Even Novaya Zhizn characterized it as &ldquo;a combination of demagoguery and impotence.&rdquo; From day to day (it said) the Government of the People&rsquo;s Commissars sinks deeper and deeper into the mire of superficial haste. Having easily conquered the power… the Bolsheviki can not make use of it. Powerless to direct the existing mechanism of Government, they are unable at the same time to create a new one which might work easily and freely according to the theories of social experimenters.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 159</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;"The attitude of Socialists on the question of freedom of the Press should be the same as their attitude toward the freedom of business…. The rule of the democracy which is being established in Russia demands that the domination of the Press by private property must be abolished, just as the domination of industry by private property…. The power of the Soviets should confiscate all printing-plants.&ldquo; (Cries, &ldquo;Confiscate the printing-shop of Pravda!&rdquo;)&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 163</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;"The monopoly of the Press by the bourgeoisie must be abolished. Otherwise it isn&rsquo;t worth while for us to take the power! Each group of citizens should have access to print shops and paper…. The ownership of print-type and of paper belongs first to the workers and peasants, and only afterwards to the bourgeois parties, which are in a minority…. The passing of the power into the hands of the Soviets will bring about a radical transformation of the essential conditions of existence, and this transformation will necessarily be evident in the Press…. If we are going to nationalize the banks, can we then tolerate the financial journals? The old régime must die; that must be understood once and for all….&ldquo; Applause and angry cries.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 163</div></div><p>The internet as originally envisioned is socialist.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;&rdquo;We have thrown off the yoke of capitalism, just as the first revolution threw off the yoke of Tsarism. If the first revolution had the right to suppress the Monarchist papers, then we have the right to suppress the bourgeois press. It is impossible to separate the question of the freedom of the Press from the other questions of the class struggle. We have promised to close these newspapers, and we shall do it. The immense majority of the people is with us! &ldquo;Now that the insurrection is over, we have absolutely no desire to suppress the papers of the other Socialist parties, except inasmuch as they appeal to armed insurrection, or to disobedience to the Soviet Government. However, we shall not permit them, under the pretence of freedom of the Socialist press, to obtain, through the secret support of the bourgeoisie, a monopoly of printing-presses, ink and paper…. These essentials must become the property of the Soviet Government, and be apportioned, first of all, to the Socialist parties in strict proportion to their voting strength….&rdquo;&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 163</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;There remained several centres of dangerous opposition, such as the &ldquo;republics&rdquo; of Ukraine and Finland, which were showing definitely anti-Soviet tendencies. Both at Helsingfors and at Kiev the Governments were gathering troops which could be depended upon, and entering upon campaigns of crushing Bolshevism, and of disarming and expelling Russian troops. The Ukrainean Rada had taken command of all southern Russia, and was furnishing Kaledin reinforcements and supplies. Both Finland and Ukraine were beginning secret negotiations with the Germans, and were promptly recognized by the Allied Governments, which loaned them huge sums of money, joining with the propertied classes to create counter-revolutionary centres of attack upon Soviet Russia. In the end, when Bolshevism had conquered in both these countries, the defeated bourgeoisie called in the Germans to restore them to power….&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 171</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Not by compromise with the propertied classes, or with the other political leaders; not by conciliating the old Government mechanism, did the Bolsheviki conquer the power. Nor by the organized violence of a small clique. If the masses all over Russia had not been ready for insurrection it must have failed. The only reason for Bolshevik success lay in their accomplishing the vast and simple desires of the most profound strata of the people, calling them to the work of tearing down and destroying the old, and afterward, in the smoke of falling ruins, cooperating with them to erect the frame-work of the new….&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 175</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;In the industrial, agrarian and supply departments the politics of the propertied classes, acting with the Government, increases the natural disorganization caused by the war. The propertied classes, which are provoking a peasants&rsquo; revolt! The propertied classes, which are provoking civil war, and openly hold their course on the bony hand of hunger, with which they intend to overthrow the Revolution and finish with the Constituent Assembly!&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 194</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The interview of which this is an excerpt was cabled to the United States, and in a few days sent back by the American State Department, with a demand that it be &ldquo;altered.&rdquo; This Kerensky refused to do; but it was done by his secretary, Dr. David Soskice—and, thus purged of all offensive references to the Allies, was given to the press of the world….&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 207</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The printing of advertisements, in newspapers, books, bill-boards, kiosks, in offices and other establishments is declared to be a State monopoly.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 252</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Advertising offices are confiscated by the Government, the owners being entitled to compensation in cases of necessity. Small proprietors, depositors and stock-holders of the confiscated establishments will be reimbursed for all moneys held by them in the concern.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 252</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Every conscious worker understands perfectly that we cannot avoid this hostility, because the high officials have set themselves against the People and do not wish to abandon their posts without resistance. But the working classes are not for one moment afraid of that resistance. The majority of the people are for us. For us are the majority of the workers and the oppressed of the whole world. We have justice on our side. Our ultimate victory is certain.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 253</div></div>      </div>
      </div>
        <div class="footer">
    <div class="footer-data"><div class="footer-links"><ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/contact.php" title="">Contact</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/support.php" title="">Support</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/privacy.php" title="">Privacy</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/rights.php" title="">Rights</a></li></ul></div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="copyright">Copyright (c) 1999-2026 earthli.com. All Rights Reserved.</div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="versions">Powered by <ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore/app_news.php">earthli News 3.7</a></li><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore" title="">earthli WebCore&trade; 3.7</a></li></ul></div></div>    </div>
      </div>
  </div>  </body>
</html>
]]>
  </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
      <title type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[Industrial Society and its Future by Theodore Kaczynski (1995) (read in 2018)]]>
  </title>
    <id>https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3538</id>
    <link href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3538"/>
    <updated>2018-04-08T20:33:17+02:00</updated>
    <author>
        <name type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[Marco von Ballmoos]]>
  </name>
      <uri>https://earthli.com/users/marco</uri>
    </author>
      <summary type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<blockquote class="quote abstract "><div>Disclaimer: these are notes I took while reading this book. They include citations I found interesting or enlightening or particularly well-written. In some cases, I&rsquo;ve pointed out which of these applies to which citation; in others, I have not. Any benefit you gain from reading these notes is... [<a class="complete-text-link" href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3538">More</a>]</div></blockquote>]]>
  </summary>
      <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<html lang="en">
  <head>
    <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/themes/ice.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/fonts/raleway.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/core/medium.css">
  </head>
  <body>
<div class="style-controls">  <div class="page">
    <div class="page-body">
<div class="info-box-top">
<p>
Published by <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_user.php?name=marco" title="Marco von Ballmoos" class="visible">marco</a> on <span class="date-time">8. Apr 2018 20:33:17 (GMT-5)</span>
</p>
</div>
      <div class="text-flow wide">
  <blockquote class="quote abstract "><div>Disclaimer: these are notes I took while reading this book. They include citations I found interesting or enlightening or particularly well-written. In some cases, I&rsquo;ve pointed out which of these applies to which citation; in others, I have not. Any benefit you gain from reading these notes is purely incidental to the purpose they serve of reminding me what I once read. Please see Wikipedia for a summary if I&rsquo;ve failed to provide one sufficient for your purposes. If my notes serve to trigger an interest in this book, then I&rsquo;m happy for you.</div></blockquote><p>The full text of this long essay/short book is available online at <a href="https://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/national/longterm/unabomber/manifesto.text.htm">Unabomber Special Report</a> (<cite><a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/">Washington Post</a></cite>). To the Post&rsquo;s credit, it&rsquo;s still online after over 20 years. There is very little that is particularly incendiary about this document (if you&rsquo;ll pardon the phrase). Though his actions were mad—despite his railing against society&rsquo;s deprivation of freedom, he saw fit to rob several people of their own freedom by killing them—his reasoning is not.</p>
<p>I wanted to see what the fuss was about and what the Unabomber&rsquo;s actual demands were. His arguments are lucid, if not always convincing. I was expecting a bit more craziness, like in <em>Dianetics</em>, but Kaczynski was much smarter, apparently—he was certainly a better writer.</p>
<p>The essay is basically structured as follows:</p>
<ol>
<li>He rails against leftists for about 20% of the essay, discussing their psychology and &ldquo;oversocialization&rdquo;. As a university professor without a more rational and less strictly left-leaning tendency, he seems to have felt himself in a minority against which he needed to lash out. Some of the characteristics he pointed out are quite negative, but his inability to nail down who, exactly, he considers to be a leftist—or which modes of thought are the types of leftism to avoid—robs his argument of much of its power.</li>
<li>He then discusses different types of work, including <em>surrogate activities</em> and a definition of the <em>power process</em>.</li>
<li>He goes into detail in the <em>Disruption of the Power Process in Modern Society</em> chapter. Here he expands on an idea that the main goal of society is subjugation through disempowerment. He builds up the argument reasonably well, without too much bombast.</li>
<li>He discusses freedom and the logical tension between freedom and technology/industrial society. Pre-industrial societies are by definition more free because the lack of long-distance communication and travel prevent the overarching, larger systems of control that are inevitably wrought by technology (and those who control it).</li>
<li>He moves from mind control through propaganda to control via pharmaceuticals and genetic modification (even less far-fetched 20 years later).</li>
<li>From there, he discusses how technology becomes a self-promulgating end in itself, inevitably leading to a place where humankind is so dependent on it that it no longer matters whether it is in charge because it took over or because the humans capitulated. The dependency implies the control.</li>
<li>Next up are more predictions, many of which have unsurprisingly come true (or have been much more concretely realized than in the 90s). The world we have, dominated as it is by surveilling corporations and governments and a nearly useless media landscape is not far off from Kaczynski&rsquo;s nightmare vision.</li>
<li>Finally, there are concrete action plans and ideas for how to foment the required revolution to devolve society to pre-industry. He also acknowledges that it won&rsquo;t be easy, regardless of how he&rsquo;s proven its necessity if we are to survive as psychologically independent individuals with even a modicum of freedom (paraphrased from his ideas, by the way). There is a discussion of revolutionary techniques, how to build an intelligent core with rational argument and then bring the rabble on board with simpler reasoning (that is pitched to inspire the second group without alienating the first group). Any group that inspired such a devolution would necessarily be rejected for the loss in lifestyle that they&rsquo;d engendered, after which the technological elite would quickly take the reins again.</li>
<li>In the end, he manages to prove the inevitability of technology, the zero-sum game it has with individual freedom and the near impossibility of freedom winning out.</li></ol><h2>Citations</h2><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Many people who pursue surrogate activities will say that they get far more fulfillment from these activities than they do from the “mundane” business of satisfying their biological needs, but that is because in our society the effort needed to satisfy the biological needs has been reduced to triviality. More importantly, in our society people do not satisfy their biological needs AUTONOMOUSLY but by functioning as parts of an immense social machine. In contrast, people generally have a great deal of autonomy in pursuing their surrogate activities.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;47. Among the abnormal conditions present in modern industrial society are excessive density of population, isolation of man from nature, excessive rapidity of social change and the breakdown of natural small-scale communities such as the extended family, the village or the tribe.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;For example, a variety of noise-making devices: power mowers, radios, motorcycles, etc. If the use of these devices is unrestricted, people who want peace and quiet are frustrated by the noise. If their use is restricted, people who use the devices are frustrated by the regulations. But if these machines had never been invented there would have been no conflict and no frustration generated by them.)&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>It&rsquo;s a logically correct point, but hard to call valid. Is he arguing here for picking and choosing technological advances? As we&rsquo;ll see later, he&rsquo;s actually working his way toward a complete negation of technology beyond that which is necessary to provide basic physical comforts. He tries to prove that to allow technology a longer leash than that leads inevitably to a complete loss of freedom and enslavement by the system wrought by technological advance.</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Would-be industrial societies that have done a poor job of subordinating personal or local loyalties to loyalty to the system are usually very inefficient. (Look at Latin America.) Thus an advanced industrial society can tolerate only those small-scale communities that are emasculated, tamed and made into tools of the system.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;In fact, 19th century American society had an optimistic and self-confident tone, quite unlike that of today’s society. [8]&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>He&rsquo;s all over the place here. Isn&rsquo;t it just as likely that people in the nineteenth century were just as unhappy as those today, but they didn&rsquo;t say anything? Or, more precisely, they didn&rsquo;t have any way of saying it in a way that would be passed down to us? How can we even begin to imagine we can estimate the relative happiness of a culture that never measured such a thing? Even today, we aren&rsquo;t even close to agreement about what the purpose of life is, or what it means to be happy. Kaczynski implies his definition is axiomatic and that to question it is to give in to &ldquo;leftist&rdquo; tendencies. What is a leftist? Oh boy, how much time have you got? Just kidding, he ends his essay by pointing out that he can&rsquo;t really pin it down either, but he knows one when he sees one. That&rsquo;s a little unfair to him, actually. He makes quite an effort to define &ldquo;leftists&rdquo; but does admit to a bit of hand-waving.</p>
<p>The next chapter, <em>Disruption of the Power Process in Modern Society</em>, is interesting, discussing how people&rsquo;s power over their own lives is subverted by propaganda and advertising that often masquerades as education programs.</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Advertising and marketing techniques have been developed that make many people feel they need things that their grandparents never desired or even dreamed of. It requires serious effort to earn enough money to satisfy these artificial needs, hence they fall into group 2. (But see paragraphs 80-82.) Modern man must satisfy his need for the power process largely through pursuit of the artificial needs created by the advertising and marketing industry [11], and through surrogate activities.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;66. Today people live more by virtue of what the system does FOR them or TO them than by virtue of what they do for themselves. And what they do for themselves is done more and more along channels laid down by the system. Opportunities tend to be those that the system provides, the opportunities must be exploited in accord with rules and regulations [13], and techniques prescribed by experts must be followed if there is to be a chance of success.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Our lives depend on decisions made by other people; we have no control over these decisions and usually we do not even know the people who make them.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Our lives depend on whether safety standards at a nuclear power plant are properly maintained; on how much pesticide is allowed to get into our food or how much pollution into our air; on how skillful (or incompetent) our doctor is; whether we lose or get a job may depend on decisions made by government economists or corporation executives; and so forth. Most individuals are not in a position to secure themselves against these threats to more [than] a very limited extent. The individual’s search for security is therefore frustrated, which leads to a sense of powerlessness.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;But threats to the modern individual tend to be MAN-MADE. They are not the results of chance but are IMPOSED on him by other persons whose decisions he, as an individual, is unable to influence. Consequently he feels frustrated, humiliated and angry.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;72. Modern society is in certain respects extremely permissive. In matters that are irrelevant to the functioning of the system we can generally do what we please. We can believe in any religion we like (as long as it does not encourage behavior that is dangerous to the system). We can go to bed with anyone we like (as long as we practice “safe sex”). We can do anything we like as long as it is UNIMPORTANT. But in all IMPORTANT matters the system tends increasingly to regulate our behavior.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;80. People vary in their susceptibility to advertising and marketing techniques. Some are so susceptible that, even if they make a great deal of money, they cannot satisfy their constant craving for the the shiny new toys that the marketing industry dangles before their eyes. So they always feel hard-pressed financially even if their income is large, and their cravings are frustrated.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;It only remains to point out that in many cases a person’s way of earning a living is also a surrogate activity. Not a PURE surrogate activity, since part of the motive for the activity is to gain the physical necessities and (for some people) social status and the luxuries that advertising makes them want. But many people put into their work far more effort than is necessary to earn whatever money and status they require, and this extra effort constitutes a surrogate activity.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Consider the case of Dr. Edward Teller, who had an obvious emotional involvement in promoting nuclear power plants. Did this involvement stem from a desire to benefit humanity? If so, then why didn’t Dr. Teller get emotional about other “humanitarian” causes? If he was such a humanitarian then why did he help to develop the H- bomb? As with many other scientific achievements, it is very much open to question whether nuclear power plants actually do benefit humanity. Does the cheap electricity outweigh the accumulating waste and the risk of accidents? Dr. Teller saw only one side of the question. Clearly his emotional involvement with nuclear power arose not from a desire to “benefit humanity” but from a personal fulfillment he got from his work and from seeing it put to practical use.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;It is important not to confuse freedom with mere permissiveness (see paragraph 72).&rdquo;</div></blockquote><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;95. It is said that we live in a free society because we have a certain number of constitutionally guaranteed rights. But these are not as important as they seem. The degree of personal freedom that exists in a society is determined more by the economic and technological structure of the society than by its laws or its form of government.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;In part this was because they lacked efficient mechanisms for enforcing the ruler’s will: There were no modern, well-organized police forces, no rapid long-distance communications, no surveillance cameras, no dossiers of information about the lives of average citizens. Hence it was relatively easy to evade control.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;In any technologically advanced society the individual’s fate MUST depend on decisions that he personally cannot influence to any great extent. A technological society cannot be broken down into small, autonomous communities, because production depends on the cooperation of very large numbers of people and machines. Such a society MUST be highly organized and decisions HAVE TO be made that affect very large numbers of people.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;There is no conceivable way to remedy this in a technologically advanced society. The system tries to “solve” this problem by using propaganda to make people WANT the decisions that have been made for them, but even if this “solution” were completely successful in making people feel better, it would be demeaning.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;It is the needs of the system that are paramount, not those of the human being. For example, the system provides people with food because the system couldn’t function if everyone starved; it attends to people’s psychological needs whenever it can CONVENIENTLY do so, because it couldn’t function if too many people became depressed or rebellious.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>We find this situation in many places in our society—that the cottage industry or parasite grows to control the system. Recruiting is an example where the logical goal of allocating jobs efficiently is completely subverted by poor incentives. Companies would like to have long-lasting relationships with talented, dedicated, interested, engaged and happy employees. Similarly, employees would like to be productive and happy. Optimally efficient is if the relationship is as long as possible. No time and effort is wasted in looking for new employees or jobs. However, we now have a system where the logical middleman runs the show by its own incentives. A company&rsquo;s main business is not recruitment and hence is happy to use outside experts. Employees are the same: they are only very occasionally involved in the labor market and are happy for expertise to help them navigate the unfamiliar waters. However, the incentive of the recruiter is for each employee to work just long enough that the recruiter gets paid and not one second more. At that point, the employee is worth nothing to the recruiting company and its overriding interest is to get that employee back into the job pool in order to glean another payday. The interest of the recruiter is also to artificially escalate pay regardless of value provided because that also increase the size of the payday. The least economically and societally useful part of the process has given itself primacy in the process, making itself somehow indispensable with its bullshit business practices. But, after a while, employees feel that they can&rsquo;t get a job without a recruiter and companies are at the recruiters&rsquo; mercy because all of the good employees have signed up with one. It&rsquo;s madness and a nearly inevitable outgrowth of unchecked &ldquo;improvement&rdquo; and &ldquo;capitalization&rdquo; of a system. The original need is completely subsumed by a cancerous outgrowth.</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;[…] employees are never given autonomy as to ultimate goals—their “autonomous” efforts can never be directed toward goals that they select personally, but only toward their employer’s goals, such as the survival and growth of the company.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Similarly, in any enterprise within a socialist system, workers must direct their efforts toward the goals of the enterprise, otherwise the enterprise will not serve its purpose as part of the system.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>I&rsquo;m not sure I agree completely with these two. The argument certainly holds for larger companies—of which there are many. Most people are employed at larger firms, for which this holds. But there is room for success in other models, as well. But one must, of course, jettison most of the conventional wisdom about &ldquo;how to run a business&rdquo;. That much is certainly true.</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;You can’t get rid of the “bad” parts of technology and retain only the “good” parts. Take modern medicine, for example. Progress in medical science depends on progress in chemistry, physics, biology, computer science and other fields. Advanced medical treatments require expensive, high-tech equipment that can be made available only by a technologically progressive, economically rich society. Clearly you can’t have much progress in medicine without the whole technological system and everything that goes with it.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;(Note this important point that we have just illustrated with the case of motorized transport: When a new item of technology is introduced as an option that an individual can accept or not as he chooses, it does not necessarily REMAIN optional. In many cases the new technology changes society in such a way that people eventually find themselves FORCED to use it.)&rdquo;</div></blockquote><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Educators, humanitarian groups, conservation organizations do not hesitate to use propaganda or other psychological techniques to help them achieve their laudable ends. Corporations and government agencies, when they find it useful, do not hesitate to collect information about individuals without regard to their privacy. Law enforcement agencies are frequently inconvenienced by the constitutional rights of suspects and often of completely innocent persons, and they do whatever they can do legally (or sometimes illegally) to restrict or circumvent those rights. Most of these educators, government officials and law officers believe in freedom, privacy and constitutional rights, but when these conflict with their work, they usually feel that their work is more important.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Major social problems, if they get “solved” at all, are rarely or never solved through any rational, comprehensive plan. They just work themselves out through a process in which various competing groups pursuing their own (usually short- term) self-interest [23] arrive (mainly by luck) at some more or less stable modus vivendi. In fact, the principles we formulated in paragraphs 100-106 make it seem doubtful that rational, long-term social planning can EVER be successful.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Take our environmental problems, for example. Here the conflict of values is straightforward: economic expedience now versus saving some of our natural resources for our grandchildren.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;In effect, antidepressants are a means of modifying an individual’s internal state in such a way as to enable him to tolerate social conditions that he would otherwise find intolerable.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;an individual whose attitudes or behavior bring him into conflict with the system is up against a force that is too powerful for him to conquer or escape from, hence he is likely to suffer from stress, frustration, defeat. His path will be much easier if he thinks and behaves as the system requires. In that sense the system is acting for the benefit of the individual when it brainwashes him into conformity.)&rdquo;</div></blockquote><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;In practice, the word “abuse” tends to be interpreted to include any method of child-rearing that produces behavior inconvenient for the system. Thus, when they go beyond the prevention of obvious, senseless cruelty, programs for preventing “child abuse” are directed toward the control of human behavior on behalf of the system.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>It&rsquo;s an interesting question: are those who do their work &ldquo;for the children&rdquo; doing it for the ethical reasons they espouse or have they been brainwashed into helping society produce conforming individuals?</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Generally speaking, technological control over human behavior will probably not be introduced with a totalitarian intention or even through a conscious desire to restrict human freedom. [28] Each new step in the assertion of control over the human mind will be taken as a rational response to a problem that faces society, such as curing alcoholism, reducing the crime rate or inducing young people to study science and engineering.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;When parents send their children to Sylvan Learning Centers to have them manipulated into becoming enthusiastic about their studies, they do so from concern for their children’s welfare. It may be that some of these parents wish that one didn’t have to have specialized training to get a job and that their kid didn’t have to be brainwashed into becoming a computer nerd. But what can they do? They can’t change society, and their child may be unemployable if he doesn’t have certain skills. So they send him to Sylvan.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;In paragraph 127 we pointed out that if the use of a new item of technology is INITIALLY optional, it does not necessarily REMAIN optional, because the new technology tends to change society in such a way that it becomes difficult or impossible for an individual to function without using that technology. This applies also to the technology of human behavior. In a world in which most children are put through a program to make them enthusiastic about studying, a parent will almost be forced to put his kid through such a program, because if he does not, then the kid will grow up to be, comparatively speaking, an ignoramus and therefore unemployable.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Human freedom mostly will have vanished, because individuals and small groups will be impotent vis-a-vis large organizations armed with supertechnology and an arsenal of advanced psychological and biological tools for manipulating human beings, besides instruments of surveillance and physical coercion.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;And, as nuclear proliferation has shown, new technology cannot be kept out of the hands of dictators and irresponsible Third World nations. Would you like to speculate about what Iraq or North Korea will do with genetic engineering?&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>Talk about misplaced concerns. This is totally mainstream thinking. It&rsquo;s always interesting to see that even someone who has spent so much time coming up with an independent framework, who rails against the conventional wisdom <em>still</em> ends up espousing the most mainstream views that benefit the ruling class the most. It&rsquo;s kind of surprising to see Kaczynski knee-jerk assume that one of the official enemies of the state would be so much more horrible with technology than the U.S. had already proved itself to be. This makes him no different from those who wonder aloud what Russia would do with their nukes—as if the U.S. had never completely maliciously wiped out two whole cities with them.</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;We only point out that the fate of the human race would be at the mercy of the machines. It might be argued that the human race would never be foolish enough to hand over all power to the machines. But we are suggesting neither that the human race would voluntarily turn power over to the machines nor that the machines would willfully seize power. What we do suggest is that the human race might easily permit itself to drift into a position of such dependence on the machines that it would have no practical choice but to accept all of the machines’ decisions. As society and the problems that face it become more and more complex and as machines become more and more intelligent, people will let machines make more and more of their decisions for them, simply because machine-made decisions will bring better results than man-made ones. Eventually a stage may be reached at which the decisions necessary to keep the system running will be so complex that human beings will be incapable of making them intelligently. At that stage the machines will be in effective control. People won’t be able to just turn the machines off, because they will be so dependent on them that turning them off would amount to suicide.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Of course, life will be so purposeless that people will have to be biologically or psychologically engineered either to remove their need for the power process or to make them “sublimate” their drive for power into some harmless hobby. These engineered human beings may be happy in such a society, but they most certainly will not be free. They will have been reduced to the status of domestic animals.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Very repellent is a society in which a person can satisfy his need for power only by pushing large numbers of other people out of the way and depriving them of THEIR opportunity for power.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Thus people would spent their time shining each other’s shoes, driving each other around in taxicabs, making handicrafts for one another, waiting on each other’s tables, etc. This seems to us a thoroughly contemptible way for the human race to end up, and we doubt that many people would find fulfilling lives in such pointless busy-work. They would seek other, dangerous outlets (drugs, crime, “cults,” hate groups) unless they were biologically or psychologically engineered to adapt them to such a way of&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>So, that happened, I guess: Uber, Etsy and Blue Apron.</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;However, propaganda of the rabble-rousing type may be necessary when the system is nearing the point of collapse and there is a final struggle between rival ideologies to determine which will become dominant when the old world-view goes under.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>A literal description of the Bolshevik revolution that he disparaged earlier. Kaczynski doesn&rsquo;t seem to know how to feel about those pesky Russians. He admits that their methods (and those of the French) worked, but is always quick to follow up with relief that the program they wanted to enact never truly came to fruition. Here, too, Kaczynski shows his susceptibility to anti-Communist and anti-Socialist brainwashing (i.e. his hatred of the group of haphazardly thrown-together people he terms &ldquo;leftists&rdquo;).</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The line of conflict should be drawn between the mass of the people and the power-holding elite of industrial society (politicians, scientists, upper-level business executives, government officials, etc.). It should NOT be drawn between the revolutionaries and the mass of the people. For example, it would be bad strategy for the revolutionaries to condemn Americans for their habits of consumption. Instead, the average American should be portrayed as a victim of the advertising and marketing industry, which has suckered him into buying a lot of junk that he doesn’t need and that is very poor compensation for his lost freedom.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;192. But the way to discourage ethnic conflict is NOT through militant advocacy of minority rights (see paragraphs 21, 29). Instead, the revolutionaries should emphasize that although minorities do suffer more or less disadvantage, this disadvantage is of peripheral significance. Our real enemy is the industrial- technological system, and in the struggle against the system, ethnic distinctions are of no importance.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>This is the point being made today: the most important fight is the class war, not the ethnic one. It is the war in which we are all one side. There is no sense in getting equal rights for all, regardless of ethnicity if all you&rsquo;ve won is the equal right to a be a wage slave. If you win the war against being wage slaves together, then you automatically win the other war as well. Certain people do have it much, much worse but fighting that battle first is a distraction happily promulgated by the elites, most of whom will happily grant minorities more rights as long as the kowtow to the system of which they are the undisputed head.</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Suppose for example that some “green” party should win control of the United States Congress in an election. In order to avoid betraying or watering down their own ideology they would have to take vigorous measures to turn economic growth into economic shrinkage. To the average man the results would appear disastrous: There would be massive unemployment, shortages of commodities, etc. Even if the grosser ill effects could be avoided through superhumanly skillful management, still people would have to begin giving up the luxuries to which they have become addicted. Dissatisfaction would grow, the “green” party would be voted out of office and the revolutionaries would have suffered a severe setback. For this reason the revolutionaries should not try to acquire political power until the system has gotten itself into such a mess that any hardships will be seen as resulting from the failures of the industrial system itself and not from the policies of the revolutionaries.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;And as long as anyone harbors in some corner of his mind a negative attitude toward some minority, the leftist has to re-educated him. And ethnic minorities are not enough; no one can be allowed to have a negative attitude toward homosexuals, disabled people, fat people, old people, ugly people, and on and on and on. It’s not enough that the public should be informed about the hazards of smoking; a warning has to be stamped on every package of cigarettes.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>It really sounds like Jordan Peterson has stolen quite a bit from the Unabomber&rsquo;s playbook.</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Because of their capacity for single-minded devotion to a cause, True Believers are a useful, perhaps a necessary, ingredient of any revolutionary movement. This presents a problem with which we must admit we don’t know how to deal. We aren’t sure how to harness the energies of the True Believer to a revolution against technology.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The conservatives are just taking the average man for a sucker, exploiting his resentment of Big Government to promote the power of Big Business.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;For another thing, most of the deregulation affects business rather than the average individual, so that its main effect is to take power from the government and give it to private corporations. What this means for the average man is that government interference in his life is replaced by interference from big corporations, which may be permitted, for example, to dump more chemicals that get into his water supply and give him cancer. The conservatives are just taking the average man for a sucker, exploiting his resentment of Big Government to promote the power of Big Business.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;If a society needs a large, powerful law enforcement establishment, then there is something gravely wrong with that society; it must be subjecting people to severe pressures if so many refuse to follow the rules, or follow them only because forced. Many societies in the past have gotten by with little or no formal law- enforcement.&rdquo;</div></blockquote>      </div>
      </div>
        <div class="footer">
    <div class="footer-data"><div class="footer-links"><ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/contact.php" title="">Contact</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/support.php" title="">Support</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/privacy.php" title="">Privacy</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/rights.php" title="">Rights</a></li></ul></div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="copyright">Copyright (c) 1999-2026 earthli.com. All Rights Reserved.</div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="versions">Powered by <ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore/app_news.php">earthli News 3.7</a></li><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore" title="">earthli WebCore&trade; 3.7</a></li></ul></div></div>    </div>
      </div>
  </div>  </body>
</html>
]]>
  </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
      <title type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[Adults in the Room: My Battle with the European and American Deep Establishment by Yanis Varoufakis (2017) (read in 2018)]]>
  </title>
    <id>https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3533</id>
    <link href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3533"/>
    <updated>2018-04-08T18:21:52+02:00</updated>
    <author>
        <name type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[Marco von Ballmoos]]>
  </name>
      <uri>https://earthli.com/users/marco</uri>
    </author>
      <summary type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<blockquote class="quote abstract "><div>Disclaimer: these are notes I took while reading this book. They include citations I found interesting or enlightening or particularly well-written. In some cases, I&rsquo;ve pointed out which of these applies to which citation; in others, I have not. Any benefit you gain from reading these notes is... [<a class="complete-text-link" href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3533">More</a>]</div></blockquote>]]>
  </summary>
      <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<html lang="en">
  <head>
    <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/themes/ice.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/fonts/raleway.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/core/medium.css">
  </head>
  <body>
<div class="style-controls">  <div class="page">
    <div class="page-body">
<div class="info-box-top">
<p>
Published by <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_user.php?name=marco" title="Marco von Ballmoos" class="visible">marco</a> on <span class="date-time">8. Apr 2018 18:21:52 (GMT-5)</span>
</p>
</div>
      <div class="text-flow wide">
  <blockquote class="quote abstract "><div>Disclaimer: these are notes I took while reading this book. They include citations I found interesting or enlightening or particularly well-written. In some cases, I&rsquo;ve pointed out which of these applies to which citation; in others, I have not. Any benefit you gain from reading these notes is purely incidental to the purpose they serve of reminding me what I once read. Please see Wikipedia for a summary if I&rsquo;ve failed to provide one sufficient for your purposes. If my notes serve to trigger an interest in this book, then I&rsquo;m happy for you.</div></blockquote><p>As you can tell by the copious notes and citations I&rsquo;ve made below, I loved this book. It is the story of how Europe is just as fundamentally broken as any other human construction. If it every meant anything greater, it no longer does. It is a construct of self-serving functionaries bent on consolidating their own political capital. Its main goal is to provide wealth to the financial sector. It does not care for its member nations, as such. It does not care for long-term sustainability. It is afflicted by the same blinkered, short-term thinking that poisons most other human endeavors. It continues mainly on inertia, in some sense unaware that it is already dead. The corpse can still pump blood, so the vampires continue to feed.</p>
<p>This is the story of the five months during which Greek finance minister Yanis Varoufakis tried to save Greece from continued debt bondage. Continued debt bondage was seen as the only way forward for the European troika. Varoufakis preferred a debt-restructuring that benefitted both parties and had the added benefit of being financially feasible. The only other alternative acknowledged by both sides was Grexit—Greece leaving the euro zone and reëstablishing the drachma.</p>
<p>Varoufakis threatened Grexit and vowed never to comply to continued debt bondage. His government was behind him in this, until…almost the very end. Despite reams of proposals and studies and endorsement from extremely knowledgable individuals showing that Varoufakis&rsquo;s plans would be effective, the troika never seriously entertained them. Honestly, it&rsquo;s hard to believe that they even read them. They just didn&rsquo;t care. Their only goal was to arrange a new loan deal—because they were never interested in getting their money back.</p>
<p>How could this be? Because the money they were interested in getting back was loaned to Greece, immediately after which it was funneled right back to the true victims of Greece&rsquo;s financial crisis—the French and German banks that had loaned money to Greece in the first place. These banks took no haircut on their risky loans. The EU made sure that they were paid back in full, but that the Greek government took the full blame for the profligacy. </p>
<p>The troika wasn&rsquo;t interested in being paid back because, once the banks had recharged their coffers and learned the harsh lesson that they would not only not be allowed to fail, they would also not be allowed to <em>not</em> turn a profit, it was only the people of Europe who were left with outstanding debts. </p>
<p>And who cares about them when you and all of your friends have not only come out smelling like roses politically but also benefited handsomely financially? What could you do? It was those dirty, lazy Greeks who nearly ruined everything—thank God the troika came to the rescue to limit the losses and avoid true catastrophe.</p>
<p>Why did Varoufakis fail to save Greece from continued debt bondage? Because literally <em>everyone</em> was against him. They all hated him. It was obvious to the troika that he was never going to budge the way they wanted him to. They resented him for making them work that hard to get what they had always gotten much more easily.</p>
<p>They saw the result as inevitable; why bother struggling so hard and making everyone look bad? He was always going to look bad anyway, as the representative of a reprehensible land of swarthy, shiftless ingrates suckling at the teat of superior, northern, caucasian, European generosity.</p>
<p>His own side resented and grew to hate him because he was so much <em>smarter</em> and <em>more organized</em> and more <em>well-informed</em> than they were. He knew everything. He knew the history and the minutiae of everything that had happened in the EU in the last 20 years. He did not despair (at least not publicly). His ramrod discipline and dedication shamed his own leadership into continuing when they&rsquo;d long-since capitulated in their hearts. His presence became a constant reminder to them of their own moral failing and their failure of the Greek people.</p>
<p>As for his enemies in the EU and the IMF and ECB and Euro Group? They were just stunned that he&rsquo;d even dared to open his mouth at all—other than to pleasure them with it, as stipulated in their agreement with the previous government.</p>
<p>I imagine to them Varoufakis showed up like an escort whose pimp had extracted a very good price for someone who was accommodating and open to anything—only for her to show up and want to talk and cuddle and &ldquo;get to know one another&rdquo; so that they could &ldquo;figure out how to both come to orgasm&rdquo;.</p>
<p>The EU&rsquo;s incredulity was like that of the john in such a situation—simply uncomprehending how someone could so completely fail to be on-script. After the initial confusion, the way forward was clear: punishment and humiliation and, of course, the f$%king. I apologize for the invective, but it is not just to spare the degree of criminality with which the EU behaved by employing a more diplomatic vernacular.</p>
<p>And the other nations that backed Germany unquestioningly in the Euro Group, like Latvia, were like the members of the pimp&rsquo;s stable who had long since capitulated all honor—and were resentful of the uppity new broad who thought she was better than them. As Varoufakis points out, Latvia became the troika&rsquo;s darling, an economic success story, by proving that a country could tighten its belt to improve its per-capita GDP—but only by shedding half of its working population through emigration.</p>
<p>When Varoufakis re-hired cleaning staff fired during a previous administration, he was reproached endlessly by the EU for not being sufficiently dedicated to cutting costs. The cost of 300 cleaners making a pittance per month was nothing compared to the salaries of several advisers from big banks and financial institutions that Yanis simultaneously let go, of course. But that&rsquo;s not the point, is it? The troika were bent on punishing him for having fired its crony friends at Goldman Sachs (who&rsquo;d earned millions per year). The initial firing of the cleaning staff was described as a “reform”, the rolling back of which indicates an abdication of adherence to fiduciary responsibility.</p>
<p>This was the modus operandi for the troika, always demanding more and more from an increasingly harried and chronically understaffed finance department. And if it took Yanis a long time to realize that his enemy truly was an enemy that was not at all interested in a compromise, it wasn&rsquo;t his fault, really. In the heat of battle, and probably exhausted and sleep-deprived from having spent three straight days preparing a document they demanded and have now ignored, he failed to recognize their duplicitous nature.</p>
<p>He continued to give them the benefit of the doubt, assuming that they too saw the looming danger to everyone and were interested in working together to avoid the worst of it. They were not. Life had taught them all that they would be just fine, that they would continue to fail upward no matter what happened. I count nearly everyone he mentions in this book in this group—Lagarde, Poulson…everyone. Not a single one of them every did anything to actually help. No matter how much hand-wringing and soul-searching they play-acted behind closed doors, they always knew which side their bread was buttered on when it came to public pronouncements—and then they reverted to the most simplistic mantras that they all knew were ineffective and could not be implemented, but for which they could not be blamed for promoting.</p>
<p>They had all proved themselves liars and backstabbers, incapable of even a shred of honesty. Their paramount goal was to get everything they personally wanted while conceding nothing, on principle. He failed to notice that they considered it distasteful to deal with him at all. There was probably no small amount of disgust at the chutzpah of a filthy foreigner upstart daring to attend their institutions (he attended university in England in the 70s) and for daring to seem smarter and more reasonable than they, when it is they who wield the power and he who is to capitulate. Their fury was not at his proposals, but that he was wasting their time, making them pretend to do their jobs, while reminding them that they had always failed to do so. They punished him and Greece for daring to remove their mask of plausible deniability.</p>
<p>And when the time came to execute the only threat that Greece held over the troika, Yanis hesitated, convinced that his government had his back and that they would <span class="quote-inline">&ldquo;take collective responsibility for the decision over the precise timing of [Greece&rsquo;s] withdrawal from the negotiations.&rdquo;</span></p>
<p>They did not. And that is his regret: that he did not take unilateral action at the solitary moment when he had the power to do so. He opted for democracy and was betrayed by his compatriots. I think he’s too hard on himself.</p>
<p>And his friends in the Greek government didn&rsquo;t collapse all at once: no, the Troika had its agents embedded everywhere. <em>Steter Tropfen hoehlt den Stein</em>, as we say in German. They didn&rsquo;t have to push too much—we&rsquo;ve seen time and again how much human suffering a single person is willing to engender for what appears to be a ludicrously meager personal gain. How can you succeed when all your enemy need do is turn one functionary? And he probably sold out for a pittance? Even if it was blackmail, or the guy failed to grasp the import of his duplicity, he didn’t seem to care. An appeal to ego was probably sufficient.</p>
<p>As mentioned above, there are also the impossible time constraints imposed on these processes. Where the EU drags its feet for years on other issues, they pressed one of its member nations to make momentous decisions in days, if not hours. There were so many late-night and weekend meetings. As things came to a head, they would work all night. In one such meeting, Yanis and Alexis (the prime minister) were working on a bank official, <span class="quote-inline">&ldquo;Alexis and I strove to shift him from [his viewpoint] with a mixture of logic and firmness. In the end, our pressure bore fruit.&rdquo;</span> </p>
<p>Well, of course it did: it was four in the morning. These are such momentous decisions being taken by people rendered provably incompetent by lack of sleep or respite from pressure. This is akin to torture. The tight deadlines are not coincidental.</p>
<p>Here he describes a moment when he realized that most of his government had already gone over to the other side.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The mask was off. The cynicism was extraordinary. He had just told me, quite brazenly, that he was ready to work directly for the troika rather than sever his privileged links with the troika’s functionaries in my ministry. Not only this, he had openly admitted that he was already in cahoots with the troika’s primary ally, the governor of the Greek Central Bank, who had begun the bank run in the run-up to our election as part of their bid to keep us from office. I was aghast.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 302</div></div><p>This is a veritable tsunami of opposition, all betraying their people, likely for paltry personal gain or simply ego-stroking.</p>
<p>And here, he describes his thinking about his old friend (and Prime Minister) Alexis.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;I would blame it on fear, depression and inexperience, relying eventually on sheer faith that the moment would come when he would bounce back, shake off the tentacles, reactivate his belief in our cause and honour the magnificent words with which he inspired me that first day at Maximos.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 303</div></div><p>Such is the nature of a politician. Alexis probably doesn&rsquo;t even remember what he said, having uttered the words purely out of instinct, knowing only their placatory effects. And Yanis heard only what he wanted to hear, replacing pragmatism with optimism in the face of overwhelming odds.</p>
<p>During the final negotiations, when Greece had secured a deal with China to &ldquo;prove&rdquo; that there were countries willing to invest, Varoufakis learned that the troika had undermined that as well.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The next day Alexis relayed the news from Beijing. Someone had apparently called Beijing from Berlin with a blunt message: stay out of any deals with the Greeks until we are finished with them.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 321</div></div><p>So like the mafia. So duplicitous. So evil. No concern at all for the lives hanging in the balance. Just concerned about <em>winning</em>.</p>
<p>Once the screws had turned, the EU could only suggest further cuts—again, not caring at all what that would mean for the people of one of its member nations who&rsquo;d already suffered more austerity and cuts than any other nation in recorded history.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;‘Independently of our preferences and political will,’ I said, ‘our liquidity will run out well before then [April 30th].’ He replied that we could last much longer by plundering the reserves of non-governmental but publicly owned institutions such as pension funds, universities, utility companies and local authorities.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 327</div></div><p>They&rsquo;re just relentless and inhuman. Bent on destruction at all costs. More precisely: not recognizing costs that come at the expense of non-people, where a &ldquo;person&rdquo; is defined as &ldquo;someone who has influence over my career, my power base, my wealth, or that of anyone who does have such power over me.&rdquo; Without direct or transitive personally positive effect, there is no incentive to act. Morality certainly won&rsquo;t enter into it.</p>
<p>Likewise, Jeff Sachs had a rude awakening.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Jeff tried valiantly one more time. ‘Mario,’ he said, ‘I have been listening to this discussion and I must tell you that I am concerned. Yanis has been trying to propose a practical solution to a simple-to-solve problem. You rejected that solution, which is fair enough if there are technical problems, but I have not heard from you any alternative solutions.’ Mario shrugged his shoulders. ‘It is not for the central bank to offer such solutions. This is a matter for the politicians.’ ‘Just wait and see what the politicians do when I raise the subject with them,’ I said to Jeff as we were leaving. ‘They will refer me to back to the ECB, possibly to Poul Thomsen.’ Jeff shook his head in disbelief.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 333</div></div><p>At long last: have you no shame? Categorically, no.</p>
<p>There were those who were convinced that it wasn&rsquo;t even worth trying in the first place.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Some, especially those under the control of the Left Platform, refused point-blank to cooperate on the grounds that the whole exercise was a charade. That was a fair point, but for better or worse our government’s policy was to cooperate fully within the framework of my agreement with Pierre Moscovici and within the spirit of the 20 February Eurogroup agreement, which committed us to doing our utmost to establish common ground with the creditors.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 342</div></div><p>They were 100% right, though. It was a tremendous and deliberate waste of time and capital. Varoufakis had to <em>try</em>, of course. He had to try for that less-than-1% chance that the troika weren&rsquo;t what they appeared to be, weren&rsquo;t what they&rsquo;d proven themselves time and again to be. In hindsight, though, they should have just pulled the ripcord early and given the EU a double middle-finger as they were all pulled over the abyss.</p>
<p>And then, describing the end of a meeting with Obama, who&rsquo;d made some placatory mouth-movements.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Another warm handshake, another friendly smile and he was gone.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 376</div></div><p>Obama, as ever, full of false assurances, feigned agreement and zero support for anyone or anything that doesn&rsquo;t support his ego-myth. Even when talking to someone in dire straits, he talks of his own capitulation, encouraging their own (&ldquo;we all float down here…&rdquo;). Is he evil or stupid? He doesn&rsquo;t get the luxury of being considered stupid.</p>
<p>Varoufakis was indefatigable, always to some degree still-optimistic.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;We had to work on two fronts: compile our own comprehensive anti-MoU Plan for Greece while convincing Alexis to send an envoy to Berlin with the message Lee had scripted for us. It was the only way. But was it one that my exhausted comrade at Maximos would countenance?&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 380</div></div><p>Yanis, you&rsquo;re drowning and you don&rsquo;t recognize it. Your party won&rsquo;t help you. Everyone&rsquo;s pretending to cooperate. In the face of this, you redouble your efforts, fighting on two simultaneous fronts, exhausted, and nearly alone. I, of course, respect him immensely for making them show their true colors, for having given them every opportunity <em>not</em> to be assholes. I also have newfound respect for Jeff Sachs for sticking by you. He&rsquo;s clearly one of the good ones.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The words of caution that Jeff Sachs had once shared with me rang true: ‘These people lie. Don’t trust them.’ Still I could hardly believe that Poul could have been so blatant.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 419</div></div><p>I guess Yanis&rsquo;s honesty is refreshing, but his naiveté is disheartening.</p>
<p>Highly recommended.</p>
<h2>Citations</h2><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;For all who eagerly seek compromise but would rather be crushed than end up compromised.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page v</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;So, in order to be as fair and impartial as possible, I have tried to see their actions and my own through the lens of an authentic ancient Greek or Shakespearean tragedy in which characters, neither good nor bad, are overtaken by the unintended consequences of their conception of what they ought to do. I suspect that I have come closer to succeeding in this task in the case of those people whom I found fascinating and rather less so in the case of those whose banality numbed my senses. For this I find it hard to apologize, not least because to present them otherwise would be to diminish the historical accuracy of this account.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 4</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;When a large-scale crisis hits, it is tempting to attribute it to a conspiracy between the powerful. Images spring to mind of smoke-filled rooms with cunning men (and the occasional woman) plotting how to profit at the expense of the common good and the weak. These images are, however, delusions. If our sharply diminished circumstances can be blamed on a conspiracy, then it is one whose members do not even know that they are part of it. That which feels to many like a conspiracy of the powerful is simply the emergent property of any network of super black boxes.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 11</div></div><p>Here I feel he&rsquo;s being overly generous, but he may have a point. The petty interests seem to align for the same result as if there <em>had</em> been a conspiracy.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The result is a network of power within other pre-existing networks, involving participants who conspire de facto without being conscious conspirators.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 12</div></div><p>Do not attribute to malice what can be explained by a confluence of many petty self-interests</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Once caught in this web of power it takes an heroic disposition to turn whistle-blower, especially when one cannot hear oneself think amid the cacophony of so much money-making. And those few who do break ranks end up like shooting stars, quickly forgotten by a distracted world.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 12</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The reason why my signature mattered so much was that, curiously, it is not presidents or prime ministers of fallen countries that sign bailout loan agreements with the IMF or with the European Union. That poisoned privilege falls to the hapless finance minister. It is why it was crucial to Greece’s creditors that I be bent to their will, that I should be co-opted or, failing that, crushed and replaced by a more pliant successor. Had I signed, another outsider would have turned insider and praise would have been heaped upon me. The torrent of foul adjectives directed at me by the international press, arriving right on cue only a little more than a week after that Washington visit, just as the US official had warned me it would, would never have descended onto my head. I would have been ‘responsible’, a ‘trustworthy partner’, a ‘reformed maverick’ who had put his nation’s interests above his ‘narcissism’.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 14</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;For capitalism to advance in the nineteenth century, the absurd notion that all debts are sacred had to be ditched and replaced with the notion of limited liability. After all, if all debts are guaranteed, why should lenders lend responsibly? And why should some debts carry a higher interest rate than other debts, reflecting the higher risk of going bad?&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 19</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;It’s not hard to imagine the panic enveloping President Sarkozy of France and his finance minister, Christine Lagarde, as they realized that they might have to conjure up €562 billion from thin air. And it’s not difficult to picture the angst of one of Lagarde’s predecessors in France’s finance ministry, the notorious Dominic Strauss-Kahn, who was then managing director of the IMF and intent on using that position to launch his campaign for France’s presidency in two years’ time. France’s top officials knew that Greece’s bankruptcy would force the French state to borrow six times its total annual tax revenues just to hand it over to three idiotic banks.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 24</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;After a few weeks they figured out their fib: they would portray the second bailout of their banks as an act of solidarity with the profligate and lazy Greeks, who while unworthy and intolerable were still members of the European family and would therefore have to be rescued. Conveniently, this necessitated providing them with a further gargantuan loan with which to pay off their French and German creditors, the failing banks.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 26</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;In my book The Global Minotaur, which I was writing in 2010 while Greece was imploding, I argued that free-market capitalist ideology expired in 2008, seventeen years after communism kicked the bucket. Before 2008 free-market enthusiasts portrayed capitalism as a Darwinian jungle that selects for success among heroic entrepreneurs. But in the aftermath of the 2008 financial collapse, the Darwinian natural selection process was stood on its head: the more insolvent a banker was, especially in Europe, the greater his chances of appropriating large chunks of income from everyone else: from the hard-working, the innovative, the poor and of course the politically powerless. Bankruptocracy is the name I gave to this novel regime.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 28</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Was Greek’s unholy treatment a conspiracy? If so, it was one without conscious conspirators, at least at the outset. Christine Lagarde and her ilk never set out to found Europe’s bankruptocracy. When the French banks faced certain death, what choice did she have as France’s finance minister, alongside her European counterparts and the IMF, but to do whatever it took to save them – even if this entailed lying to nineteen European parliaments at once about the purpose of the Greek loans? But having lied once and on such a grand scale, they were soon forced to compound the deceit in an attempt to hide it beneath fresh layers of subterfuge. Coming clean would have been professional suicide. Before they knew it, bankruptocracy had enveloped them too, just as surely as it had enveloped Europe’s outsiders.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 29</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;To illustrate the point, in 2015 the British Treasury repaid a bond issued during the South Sea Bubble crisis of the 1720s.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 500</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Not being a natural-born politician, I would respond with a line by John Kenneth Galbraith: ‘There are times in politics when you must be on the right side and lose.’ Little did I know how prophetic that would prove.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 32</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;In 2010, for every $100 of income a Greek made, the state owed €146 to foreign banks. A year later, every €100 of income earned in 2010 had shrunk to €91 before shrinking again to €79 by 2012. Meanwhile, as the official loans from European taxpayers came in before being funnelled to France and Germany’s banks, the equivalent government debt rose from €146 in 2010 to €156 in 2011. Even if God and all the angels were to invade the soul of every Greek tax evader, turning us into a nation of parsimonious Presbyterian Scots, our incomes were too low and our debts too high to reverse the bankruptcy. Investors understood this and wouldn’t touch a Greek investment project with a bargepole.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 37</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Once I was there, with the international Left in permanent disarray, US libertarians and UK free marketeers were among my most effective supporters. Interestingly, their ideological, quasi-Darwinian commitment to letting the market’s losers perish was pushing them towards my side. Mindful of the dangers of too much credit, their dictum that ‘To every irresponsible borrower there corresponds an irresponsible lender’ led them to the conclusion that bad loans should burden irresponsible lenders, not taxpayers.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 37</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Banks restructure the debt of stressed corporations every day, not out of philanthropy but out of enlightened self-interest. But the problem was that, now that we had accepted the EU–IMF bailout, we were no longer dealing with banks but with politicians who had lied to their parliaments to convince them to relieve the banks of Greece’s debt and take it on themselves.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 38</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Austerity is an awful economic policy that, as explained previously, is guaranteed to fail in bad times. But austerity is not really an economic policy at all. Austerity is a morality play pressed into the service of legitimizing cynical wealth transfers from the have-nots to the haves during times of crisis, in which debtors are sinners who must be made to pay for their misdeeds.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 40</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;President Sarkozy and Chancellor Merkel resigned themselves to the idea of Greek debt restructuring on condition that it would burn only those creditors who were incapable of harming them much. By the summer of 2011, it was decided: the haircut would mainly hit Greek pension funds, Greek semi-public institutions and Greek savers who had bought government bonds, while the loans provided by the IMF and the European institutions in 2010 would of course remain inviolable.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 41</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Glossy prospectuses, featuring everything from the nation’s ports and railways to pristine beaches and small islands, invited potential buyers to make an offer. The family silver was for sale, and the proceeds were to be collected by Greece’s foreign creditors through local appointees.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 47</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;In Bailoutistan 2.0 privatizations meant something else: selling public assets for small change, as the economic depression had sent prices through the floor, with the proceeds thrown into the bottomless pit of Greece’s unpayable public debt.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 502</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;That a European country embedded in the continent’s great common currency experiment would end up being pushed around like a banana republic is a devastating indictment of a union supposedly founded on the promise of shared prosperity and mutual respect.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 48</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Of course Europe’s establishment had willed none of this. Before 2008 the elites in Berlin, Brussels, Paris and Frankfurt had believed their own rhetoric, as had those in the United States and the City of London: capitalism had delivered the Great Moderation; boom and bust was a thing of the past; banks had found a magical way to produce ‘riskless risk’and were self-regulating marvellously. Those in authority believed that history had ended, and their job was one of micro-management, of nudging a magnificent self-guided, self-managing system in a broadly predetermined, rational direction.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 48</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The triangle of sin was complete: the insolvent media were kept in a zombified condition by the zombie banks, which were maintained in their undead condition by a bankrupt government, itself preserved in a condition of permanent bankruptcy by the EU and the IMF’s bailout loans.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 55</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;I agreed that we would be better off if we had never entered the eurozone but hastened to add that it was one thing to have stayed out of the euro and quite another to leave it. Exiting would not get us to where we would have been had we not entered!&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 58</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Taken together, these two debt restructuring exercises would signal a new era: the EU and the IMF would no longer operate like a pre-Christmas Ebenezer Scrooge. Rather, they would become Greece’s partners in promoting its economic recovery, without which their bailout loans would be haircut savagely anyway.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 65</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;could – so much so that the swingeing austerity introduced&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 72</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;didn’t believe in technocrats being parachuted into a political process. In truth I still had fundamental concerns. Negotiating on a country’s behalf requires a democratic mandate. The Modest Proposal represented my personal convictions, and I had no desire to legitimize the de-politicization of economic policy, that most political of realms.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 85</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The Thessaloniki Programme, as Alexis’s speech was labelled, was well meaning but incoherent and definitely inconsistent with the Five-Pronged Strategy, which Alexis and Pappas had supposedly endorsed. It promised wage rises, subsidies, benefits and investment paid for with sources of funding which were either imaginary or illegal.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 88</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;I explained that I thought the private sector should pay more in total tax revenue, but the only way to achieve an overall increase in their contribution at a time of next to no sales and with bankrupt banks unable to provide credit even to profitable firms was to reduce the corporate tax rate.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 100</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;I replied that unless we were prepared to turn the banks over to the European Union, we would not be able to unburden the Greek state of the liabilities incurred by their fake recapitalization. Bank nationalization would only make sense in the event of Grexit.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 101</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;‘Debt restructuring comes first. Second, a primary surplus of no more than 1.5 per cent of national income and no new austerity measures. Third, wide-ranging reductions in sales and business tax rates. Fourth, strategic privatizations under conditions that preserve labour rights and boost investment. Fifth, the creation of a development bank that would use remaining public assets as collateral to generate a domestic investment drive, and whose dividends would be channelled into public pension funds. Sixth, a policy of transferring bank shares and management to the European Union while creating a public “bad bank” to deal with the banks’ non-performing loans, so as to prevent evictions and the mass expropriation of small business by vulture funds.’&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 102</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;I confirmed that that was exactly my point: there was no point entering into a tough negotiation with the world’s most powerful credit institutions unless we were after a viable agreement within the euro, did nothing to jeopardize such an agreement, but were also clear in our minds that between surrender to a renewed sentence in debtors’ prison and Grexit we preferred the latter.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 102</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;‘But what happens if you do not get elected?’ Alexis insisted. ‘Then the people will have said that they do not want me to represent them in the Eurogroup. Simple! The idea of technocrats negotiating economic treaties on behalf of the ignorant masses is repugnant to me and deserves to be buried.’&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 104</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;recalled an old joke: two golfers exchange their life stories as they move from one hole to the next. The first one confesses that he made his fortune when his ailing factory burned down and he was able to claim the insurance. The second golfer then confesses that he also made it big when his own business was destroyed by a flood, netting him a nice cheque from the insurance company. The first golfer looks puzzled. ‘But how did you start the flood?’ he asks.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 107</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Do you possess no thin red line of your own? If you don’t, does this not mean that you are relying on the kindness, and wisdom, of the creditors? Does it not also rely on them caring about Greece, rather than using Greece’s crisis as collateral damage in their tussle against Paris, Rome and Madrid. Please tell the voters and let them decide which policy is most dangerous and least dignified. Yours or ours?&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 513</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;In a rational Europe this absurd debt would simply be written off. Alas, the ECB’s charter does not allow for this. To accommodate the ECB’s charter, I took a leaf from the British Treasury’s book. The British government had long practised the issue of open-ended, or perpetual, bonds. These yield interest, but the government may repay the principal at a time of its choosing, if ever. Indeed, perpetual bonds issued at the time of the South Sea Bubble in the 1720s and by Neville Chamberlain and Winston Churchill during and just after the Great War were only repaid by the British Treasury in late 2014 and early 2015.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 114</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;They signalled to the public and to potential investors that the EU was accepting a new role: no longer the harsh creditor of an insolvent state, it would become a partner in Greece’s growth, as its own returns would be proportional to Greek nominal income growth. They would have been enough to cause an influx of investment into an investment-starved Greece. They would have ended the Greek recession with winners all round, the only exceptions being the cockroaches that flourish in the filth caused by prolonged misery.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 114</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;However, not for a moment did I believe, back then in January 2015, that the unquestionable logic and obvious moderation of my proposals would win our creditors over. As I had been telling Alexis since 2012, any proposal from us that contradicted the troika’s Greek programme would be met with naked aggression and the threat of shuttered banks. Logic hardly mattered. Mutual economic advantage was irrelevant. The creditors did not want their money back. What mattered to them was their authority, and that was being challenged by a leftist government whose success at negotiating a new deal for its country was the creditors’ greatest nightmare, as it might give ideas to other Europeans labouring under the same crisis and the same irrational policies.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 115</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;As well as creating the Hellenic Financial Stability Facility (HFSF), which after 2012 held the banks’ majority shareholdings on behalf of the state, and a privatization unit whose job was to conduct fire sales of Greece’s public assets, both of which answered not to the Greek people but to the troika, the jurisdiction of the tax office had also been co-opted by our creditors – specifically, to the Eurogroup Working Group, presided over by Thomas Wieser. By scooping out these three crucial chunks of the Ministry of Finance and placing them beyond the reach of Greece’s democratic process, they had effectively turned the ministry into something resembling a Swiss cheese.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 163</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;On paper Roubatis seemed well qualified to head an intelligence service better known for US-sponsored subversion of Greek democrats and leftists than for defending Greece from foreign foes: as a young man he had written a doctoral thesis at Johns Hopkins University that exposed the infiltration of the Greek government by the CIA, and the government he served in the 1980s did a great deal to sever the link between foreign agencies and Greek spooks.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 164</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;‘It is a sad day for Europe when the Eurogroup president presents a freshly elected finance minister with an impossible ultimatum,’ I said. ‘We were not elected to clash with the Eurogroup, and I am not interested in clashing with you. But nor were we elected to abdicate during our first week in office by espousing an impossible programme that we came in with a mandate to renegotiate.’&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 169</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;1953 the US government brokered the so-called London Debt Agreement. In essence, the United States leaned on Britain, France, Greece, Italy, Spain, Sweden, Yugoslavia, Norway, Switzerland and many other countries to write off the greatest part of Germany’s pre-war debt to them. The British government protested, arguing that Germany had both the capacity and the moral duty to pay. Washington vetoed London and, to lead by example, immediately wrote off the loans that it had forwarded to Bonn after 1945. Germany’s debts to nations and private creditors were haircut by more than 70 per cent.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 519</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;‘We are going to destroy the basis upon which they have built for decade after decade a system, a network that viciously sucks the energy and the economic power from everybody else in society.’&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 172</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;For years I had recited to my students Adam Smith’s famous lines ‘It is not from the benevolence of the butcher, the brewer, or the baker that we expect our dinner, but from their regard to their own interest. We address ourselves, not to their humanity but to their self-love, and never talk to them of our own necessities but of their advantages.’22 Similarly, it would be a waste of breath to appeal to the creditors’ humanity, to claim that Greece had been unfairly treated or to invoke some moral right to debt relief. These people knew perfectly well how the Greeks had been treated and they cared not one bit. My task was to win a war not a debating society argument. To do so I had to address myself to the creditors’ own advantages.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 177</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The only colleague that I trusted to understand fully and support my debt-restructuring proposals was Euclid. As a Syriza insider, he could present my proposals to the party faithful for what they were: a shrewd strategy for getting Greece the debt relief it needed without putting Chancellor Merkel in a politically impossible situation.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 178</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;No one owes us a living. But no one has the right either to hold us in debtors’ prison in perpetuity, preventing us from earning our keep.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 180</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Moscovici was given the job, but a new position, vice president of the European Commission, was invented to oversee him. To add insult to injury, Berlin gave this new post to the former prime minister of Latvia, whose greatest claim to fame was the imposition of austerity measures&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 182</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;This conundrum was solved in a manner that anyone in Pierre Moscovici’s place would have found demeaning: Moscovici was given the job, but a new position, vice president of the European Commission, was invented to oversee him. To add insult to injury, Berlin gave this new post to the former prime minister of Latvia, whose greatest claim to fame was the imposition of austerity measures so harsh that they ‘solved’ his country’s economic crisis by causing half the population to emigrate.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 182</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The notion of ‘Bankruptocracy’ in Varoufakis, 2011, is relevant: a regime in which bankrupt banks rule based on the principle that the greater one’s losses, the greater one’s power to extract rents from the rest of society.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 520</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;‘Having to borrow now from EU taxpayers to pay the ECB for bonds that it should not have purchased in the first place is ridiculous to say the least,’&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 186</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;if the ECB didn’t do what was necessary to end a bank run of its own making, if it didn’t extend to us the helping hand we needed in order to conduct our negotiations, many would see it as political intervention by the ECB – one set of standards for the Samaras government, another for ours.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 187</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;I shared my own sense of the dilemma: ‘I find myself in the peculiar situation of constantly proposing policies for shoring up a currency whose design and creation I had opposed. But I do believe that even those of us most critical of the euro have a moral and a political duty to try to fix it, simply because its disintegration will cause so much human pain.’&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 193</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;trick. London-based financiers, Tory politicians, influential journalists and former members of the IMF all appeared to see my point. Yes, we were a left-wing government, but all we were asking was for some basic common sense to prevail at the centre of European power.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 197</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Of course it made perfect sense: swapping outstanding debt for growth-linked bonds accompanied by a crackdown on tax evasion and moderate budget surpluses was more a libertarian’s cup of tea than a left-winger’s. As I had remarked to the City’s financiers the previous day, it was a measure of the depth of the euro crisis that it took a radical left-wing government to table mainstream liberal proposals for its solution.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 198</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The problem was that this temporary fix had become permanent as a result of our collective failure to deal with the underlying insolvency. ‘Surely our task now is to end the death embrace, the doom loop, between insolvent banks – that the ECB is forced to keep afloat against its rules – and an insolvent state at which Europe’s taxpayers keep throwing good money after bad?’ Peter Praet and Sabine Lautenschläger, sitting on Mario’s left, looked aghast, not because what I was saying was preposterous but – I am convinced – because it was very close to their own criticism of the Greek bailouts and the ECB’s role in them.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 204</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;‘I appreciate you going through all sorts of interesting channels to find me and inform me in person, Mario,’ I said. ‘Since you are giving me the opportunity to respond in person on the telephone, allow me to say that this decision – the withdrawal of the waiver a day after I single-handedly lifted the banks’ shares and reversed the bank run, a week after our election, indeed a week before my first Eurogroup meeting, and three whole weeks before the expiry of the programme extension – can only be interpreted as a hostile, deeply political move by the ECB against my government.’&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 207</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;On the way to the federal finance ministry I noticed two emails had arrived on my phone. One was from Jamie Galbraith informing me that Bernie Sanders was about to write to Janet Yellen, the US Federal Reserve chair, to ask her to indicate to the ECB that its behaviour had been appalling and ultimately globally destabilizing.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 209</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;minister. Before getting into the lift, he asked me playfully, but with enough of a hint of aggression to establish that he was not actually joking, ‘When am I getting my money back?’ I was tempted to reply, ‘When you persuade Deutsche Bank to return it to you.’ I said nothing, smiling widely, my mind on the main game.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 210</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Second was the topic he chose to turn to instead: his theory that the ‘overgenerous’ European social model was no longer sustainable and had to be ditched. Comparing the costs to Europe of maintaining welfare states with the situation in places like India and China, where no social safety net exists at all, he argued that Europe was losing competitiveness and would stagnate unless social benefits were curtailed en masse. It was as if he was telling me that a start had to be made somewhere and that that somewhere might as well be Greece.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 211</div></div><p>Here he&rsquo;s talking about that German asshole Schaüble.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;I feel that the German nation is the one that can understand us better than anyone else. No one understands better than the people of this land how a severely depressed economy combined with ritual national humiliation and unending hopelessness can hatch the serpent’s egg within one’s society. When I return to Athens tonight, I shall find myself in a parliament in which the third-largest party is a Nazi one.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 215</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;‘the whole point is to forge new motives. To fashion a fresh mindset that transcends national divides, dissolves the creditor–debtor distinction in favour of a pan-European perspective, and places the common European good above petty politics, dogma that proves toxic if universalized, and an us-versus-them mindset.’&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 223</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;I began by confessing to the ambassador that I had never aspired to be a minister. Yes, I was happy to be doing the job, I told him, but only out of my sense of duty to a nation in debt bondage, a duty whose sole purpose was to rewrite the terms of our contract with the EU and the IMF, so as to turn it from a predatory relationship into a workable and equitable one. So accepting the current parameters of that contract was simply not an option. Here again the ambassador interjected, this time with a vague, implicit but perfectly recognizable threat. Out of respect for the people who had appointed me to my office, I felt obliged to cut him short.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 225</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;then suggested that the failure of previous governments to rescue Greece from its plight was due to their acceptance ‘of impossible conditions they could never carry out, even if they had intended to – an acceptance which made successive Greek governments almost as guilty in accepting what they could not fulfil as the creditors were in imposing what they were not entitled to exact’.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 226</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;to rescue Greece from its plight was due to their acceptance ‘of impossible conditions they could never carry out, even if they had intended to – an acceptance which made successive Greek governments almost as guilty in accepting what they could not fulfil as the creditors were in imposing what they were not entitled to exact’.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 226</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;I then suggested that the failure of previous governments to rescue Greece from its plight was due to their acceptance ‘of impossible conditions they could never carry out, even if they had intended to – an acceptance which made successive Greek governments almost as guilty in accepting what they could not fulfil as the creditors were in imposing what they were not entitled to exact’.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 226</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;If you cannot imagine walking out of a negotiation, you should never enter it. If you cannot fathom the idea of an impasse you might as well confine yourself to the role of a supplicant who implores the despot to grant him several privileges but who accepts in the final analysis whatever the despot grants.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 227</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;But, I concluded, an agreement requires compromise on both sides. Many of the measures in the MoU list were unproblematic and could be implemented without any of the sacrifices that we rejected as unacceptable. Indeed, some of the measures, such as the idea of a minimum guaranteed income, were to be desired.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 229</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Such evidence included the rehiring of the cleaners who had been dismissed from the Finance Ministry illegally (according to the Greek courts) as well as a few hundred state school janitors, and a pledge not to reduce pensions beyond the twelve separate cuts that had already reduced them by a stupendous 40 per cent.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 522</div></div><p>These were described as &ldquo;reforms&rdquo;, the rolling back of which indicates an abdication of adherence to fiduciary responsibility.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;To think of the illegal firing of a cleaner as a reform, and her rehiring as evidence that reforms were being rolled back was unhelpful if not absurd.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 234</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;As he spoke, Schäuble directed a piercing look at Sapin. ‘Elections cannot be allowed to change economic policy,’ he began. Greece had obligations that could not be reconsidered until the Greek programme had been completed, as per the agreements between my predecessors and the troika. The fact that the Greek programme could not be completed was apparently of no concern to him. What startled me more than Wolfgang Schäuble’s belief that elections are irrelevant was his total lack of compunction in admitting to this view.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 237</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Democracy is not a luxury to be afforded to the creditors and denied to the debtors. Indeed, it is the lack of due democratic process in the heart of our monetary union that is perpetuating the euro crisis. Then again, I might be wrong. Colleagues, if you think that I am wrong, if you agree with Wolfgang, then I invite you to say so explicitly by proposing that elections should be suspended in countries like Greece until the country’s programme is completed. What is the point of spending money on elections and asking our people to get all fired up to elect governments that will have no capacity to change anything?&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 238</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;‘I cannot accept this,’ Jeroen said. ‘The term “humanitarian crisis” is too political!’ ‘There is nothing more political, Jeroen,’ I snapped back, ‘than the attempt to overlook a humanitarian crisis because it would be too political to acknowledge it.’&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 241</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Jeroen approached to tell me that it was not normal for a minister to call their prime minister while in a Eurogroup meeting. I replied that it was not normal to force a minister to make an on-the-spot decision that could lead to the instant closure of his country’s banking system&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 243</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;My message to you is that this is a government interested only in Greece’s recovery within a policy framework that is therapeutic for the eurozone as a whole. This is not going to be another government that tries to fool you into believing that we shall adopt a certain reform programme just in order to get the next loan tranche. You may have gathered that we do not give a damn about the next loan tranche. We prefer to go down in flames than to keep extending this indignity.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 252</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;That same weekend Jeff Sachs was hard at work on the other side of the Atlantic, trying to convince the Fed to weigh in on our behalf and persuade the ECB to abandon its ongoing asphyxiation strategy. His message to Janet Yellen was simple: the new Greek government’s programme of reforms and fiscal targets was reasonable; they understood well that Grexit was an exceptionally dangerous path, one that would not be taken at their instigation but only under duress from the ECB; Yellen ought to tell the Europeans not to risk destabilizing the world economy over a few billion dollars and to advise Draghi to desist from introducing capital controls that would solve nothing.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 256</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Bill Black, the American economist who had campaigned so effectively against Wall Street, came to my defence. So why does the BBC treat Varoufakis as a sexy leftist and Dijsselbloem as the respected spokesperson for the troika even though Dijsselbloem is a fanatic ideologue who has caused massive human misery because of the intersection of his inflexible ideology and economic incompetence?&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 256</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The troika, by contrast, is led entirely by ideologues. The primary difference is that they are exceptionally bad economists and exceptionally indifferent to the human misery they inflict on the workers of the periphery that they despise and ridicule.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 256</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The European Commission is the closest the EU has to a government, and a commissioner has a status equivalent to a minister of state, whereas the Eurogroup, as previously mentioned, has no legal standing in any of the EU treaties. In that sense, Dijsselbloem was, officially and legally, no more than the Dutch finance minister, outranked in law by Moscovici.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 525</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Listening to him express views in the meeting that were subservient to Schäuble and Dijsselbloem, views that I knew perfectly well he did not agree with, I was hearing the sound of the EU’s descent into ignominy. His humiliation was emblematic to me of the complete subjugation of the European Commission to forces lacking legal standing or democratic legitimacy.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 262</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;We are ready and willing to do whatever it takes to reach an honourable agreement over the next two days. Our government will accept all the conditions that it can deliver upon and which do not reinforce our society’s crisis. No one has the right to work towards an impasse, especially one that is mutually detrimental to the people of Europe.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 265</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Even at the best of times, twenty-four hours often prove insufficient to deal with the tsunami of problems that rise through the bureaucracy each day to land in a finance minister’s in-box. Imagine the difficulty of running the finance ministry of a bankrupt country in the midst of an all-consuming negotiation such as ours.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 267</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;I proposed we interpret their request in a nuanced way: a corporation can ‘recognize’ a debt to its bankers while still seeking deep debt restructuring to help it recover from a crisis that threatens to ruin both its shareholders and the bank. Similarly, we could ‘recognize’ Greece’s public debt while at the same time insisting that it be immediately restructured so that the creditors could get more of their money&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 269</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The more likely scenario, however, was that the extension was a tactical ploy: by delaying any outcome they were simply waiting for the depletion of both our current popularity and our small liquidity reserves so that by the time the extension expired in June they could be sure of our exhausted government’s total capitulation. If the latter was indeed the case then, I argued, our best strategy would be to request the extension while at the same time signalling to the troika that any attempt to wear us down through a tightening of the liquidity noose would be met with a refusal to make the forthcoming repayments to the IMF; that any effort to push us back into the straitjacket of its failed programme or to deny us debt restructuring would be met with a cessation of negotiations; and that any threat of closing down our banks and imposing capital controls would be met with unilateral haircuts of the ECB’s SMP bonds,&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 270</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;I am often asked whether I thought there was ever a serious probability of successfully navigating those treacherous waters to a new deal for Greece within the eurozone. I answer that the actual probability was neither computable nor important. We had to give our creditors the chance to come to the table with humane, logical ideas, and the opportunity to listen to ours. It was always going to be a long shot, but our mandate from the people of Greece was to do our utmost to secure a sustainable future within the eurozone.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 278</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;It is remarkable that a minister of state had to negotiate for the right to introduce a clause into an agreement with international creditors stating that the courts of the land should be allowed to carry out the duties vested in them by the constitution.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 526</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;It was a tough call. But I should have made it.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 290</div></div><p>In the heat if battle, and probably exhausted and sleep-deprived from having spent three straight days preparing a document they demanded and have now ignored, he failed to recognize their duplicitous nature. All of them had proved themselves liars and backstabbers, incapable of even a shred of honesty. Their paramount goal was to get everything they personally wanted while conceding nothing, on principle. He failed to notice that they considered it distasteful to deal with him at all. Probably no small amount of disgust at the chutzpah of a filthy foreigner upstart daring to attend their institutions and for daring to seem smarter and more reasonable than they, when it is they who wield the power and he who is to capitulate. Their fury was not at his proposals, but that he was wasting their time, making them pretend to do their jobs, while reminding them that they had always failed to do so. They punished him and Greece for daring to remove their mask of plausible deniability.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The government, united and steeled by the creditors’ connivance, would, and should, take collective responsibility for the decision over the precise timing of our withdrawal from the negotiations.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 291</div></div><p>They did not. And that is his regret: that he did not take unilateral action at the solitary moment when he had the power to do so. He opted for democracy and was betrayed by his compatriots. I think he&rsquo;s too hard on himself.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;It was late in the afternoon when the reply came. Wieser’s office informed mine that the email of 21 February with all relevant information regarding the extension request process had been sent to five Greek officials: Chouliarakis, in his capacity as my Eurogroup deputy and Eurogroup Working Group representative; Dragasakis (deputy prime minister); Stournaras, as governor of the Bank of Greece; the head of my ministry’s public debt management authority; and the head of the banks’ bailout fund, the HFSF. I asked to see the email. It was there in black and white: dated 21 February, it was indeed addressed to those five people. I was flabbergasted. My accusation that Brussels had set the deadline retrospectively had been conclusively refuted.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 295</div></div><p>Stabbed in the back. The machinations are not unlike those in Mr. Robot. Just giant machines grinding inexorably on.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;‘How can such an email get lost in your in-box, George?’ I asked, barely able to believe what I had heard. Just as he had two days earlier when I had confronted him with Costello’s creation of the Word file, Chouliarakis reacted as if he had nothing to be apologetic about, as if nothing much had happened.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 296</div></div><p>How can you succeed when all your enemy need do is turn one functionary? And he probably sold out for a pittance? Even if it was blackmail, or the guy failed to grasp the import of his duplicity, he didn&rsquo;t seem to care. An appeal to ego was probably sufficient.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;He remained in that state for some time, during which Alexis and I strove to shift him from it with a mixture of logic and firmness. In the end, our pressure bore fruit.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 300</div></div><p>At four in the morning. Such momentous decisions being taken by people rendered provably incompetent by lack of sleep or respite from pressure. This is akin to torture. The tight deadlines are not coincidental.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The mask was off. The cynicism was extraordinary. He had just told me, quite brazenly, that he was ready to work directly for the troika rather than sever his privileged links with the troika’s functionaries in my ministry. Not only this, he had openly admitted that he was already in cahoots with the troika’s primary ally, the governor of the Greek Central Bank, who had begun the bank run in the run-up to our election as part of their bid to keep us from office. I was aghast.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 302</div></div><p>This is a veritable tsunami of opposition, all betraying their people, likely for paltry personal gain or simply ego-stroking.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;I would blame it on fear, depression and inexperience, relying eventually on sheer faith that the moment would come when he would bounce back, shake off the tentacles, reactivate his belief in our cause and honour the magnificent words with which he inspired me that first day at Maximos.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 303</div></div><p>Such is the nature of a politician. Alexis probably doesn&rsquo;t even remember what he said, having uttered the words purely out of instinct, knowing only their placatory effects. And Yanis heard only what he wanted to hear, replacing pragmatism with optimism in the face of overwhelming odds.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;I understood perfectly why the troika wished to get me and Nicholas out of the way. In contrast to Chouliarakis, Nicholas understood the econometric models the troika used for its fiscal predictions better than Wieser and the others did, knew what their weak points were, and was determined to oppose the Eurogroup Working Group’s lazy assumptions before they ended up as ‘facts’ at the Eurogroup. As for me, they knew I would never sign a third bailout agreement, and since it is only the finance minister who can sign a loan agreement on behalf of a eurozone member state, my removal was fundamental.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 307</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;What I had not seen coming was Alexis’s readiness to acquiesce. Divide and rule produced a farce featuring a troika appointee negotiating with the troika on behalf of a government elected to oppose it.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 307</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The uninitiated may be excused for thinking that this eurozone runaround was the result of incompetence on the part of the creditors. While there is an element of truth in this, it would be the wrong conclusion. The runaround is a systemic means of control over governments of countries whose banking and/or public sectors are financially stressed. Indeed, to politicians like Wolfgang Schäuble it is a welcome feature of the eurozone.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 308</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;As for apparatchiks like Wieser and Costello, the runaround is essential to their personal power.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 308</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Possibly because of my academic background, this was the Brussels experience I least expected and found most frustrating. In academia one gets used to having one’s thesis torn apart, sometimes with little decorum; what one never experiences is dead silence, a refusal to engage, a pretence that no thesis has been put forward at all. At a party when you find yourself stuck with a self-centred bore who says what they want to say irrespective of your contribution to the conversation, you can take your glass and disappear to some distant corner of the room. But when your country’s recovery depends on the ongoing conversation, when there is no other corner of the room to retreat to, irritation can turn into despair – or fury if you grasp what is really going on: a tactic whose purpose is to nullify anything that is inimical to the troika’s power.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 309</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Why not get companies like Foxconn to build production or assembly facilities in a tech park, enjoying a special business tax regime in an area close to Piraeus?’&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 315</div></div><p>Did Varoufakis just suggest that Foxconn—a criminally bad employer—transplant their labor policies to Greece? That&rsquo;s a bit naive.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The next day Alexis relayed the news from Beijing. Someone had apparently called Beijing from Berlin with a blunt message: stay out of any deals with the Greeks until we are finished with them.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 321</div></div><p>So like the mafia. so duplicitous. So evil. No concern at all for the lives hanging in in the balance. Just concerned about <em>winning</em>. And that lady in St. Gallen wants me to distract myself with Jesus. It&rsquo;s pure ego to do so. To waste time worrying about my own life after death when so many suffer now.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;War cabinet meetings were turning into exercises in weighing up the utility of different forms of surrender based on Syriza survivability come the next election.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 322</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;‘Independently of our preferences and political will,’ I said, ‘our liquidity will run out well before then [April 30th].’ He replied that we could last much longer by plundering the reserves of non-governmental but publicly owned institutions such as pension funds, universities, utility companies and local authorities.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 327</div></div><p>Just relentless and inhuman. Bent on destruction at all costs. More precisely: not recognizing costs that come at the expense of non-people, where a &ldquo;person&rdquo; is defined as &ldquo;someone who has influence over my career, my power base, my wealth, or that of anyone who does have such power over me. Without direct or transitive personally positive effect, there is no incentive to act. Morality certainly won&rsquo;t enter into it.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;I shall speak only the language of cooperation and goodwill. But if, Alexi, they respond with their usual mix of aggression and truth reversal, leaving us no room to manoeuvre, upon my return we must act decisively. I trust that you agree.’ Alexis agreed. </p>
<p>&ldquo;And so I set off for Brussels determined to be maximally compromising – to make sure beyond a shadow of a doubt that Greece’s creditors were committed to denying us even a minimally rational agreement. Soon I had my proof that this was so. And Jeff Sachs, who accompanied me in all the bilateral meetings I had, is my witness.&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 330</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Jeff tried valiantly one more time. ‘Mario,’ he said, ‘I have been listening to this discussion and I must tell you that I am concerned. Yanis has been trying to propose a practical solution to a simple-to-solve problem. You rejected that solution, which is fair enough if there are technical problems, but I have not heard from you any alternative solutions.’ Mario shrugged his shoulders. ‘It is not for the central bank to offer such solutions. This is a matter for the politicians.’ ‘Just wait and see what the politicians do when I raise the subject with them,’ I said to Jeff as we were leaving. ‘They will refer me to back to the ECB, possibly to Poul Thomsen.’ Jeff shook his head in disbelief.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 333</div></div><p>At long last: have you no shame? Categorically, no.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;As it was, I headed for Wolfgang’s office with Jeff and Nicholas Theocarakis, dreading what might occur but with a plan. Thinking back to what transpired I am reminded of Mike Tyson’s fantastic line at the height of his tumultuous boxing career: ‘Everyone has a plan until they get punched in the mouth.’&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 336</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Some, especially those under the control of the Left Platform, refused point-blank to cooperate on the grounds that the whole exercise was a charade. That was a fair point, but for better or worse our government’s policy was to cooperate fully within the framework of my agreement with Pierre Moscovici and within the spirit of the 20 February Eurogroup agreement, which committed us to doing our utmost to establish common ground with the creditors.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 342</div></div><p>They were 100% right, though. It was a tremendous and deliberate waste of time and capital.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;In the spring of 2015 Greece’s creditors were in no mood to negotiate; they were resolved to re-establish their authority over a territory of their empire that had rebelled and to ensure that none of their other possessions got a similar idea.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 343</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;When our people see the same figures, aided and abetted by the troika, retain control of bankrupt banks and bankrupt media with new debt burdening the little people against whose interests the banks and the media labour, you cannot expect them to take you seriously. Or take us seriously if we do as you tell us.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 369</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Alas, all the people of Greece now see is your functionaries in bed with our oligarchy’s triangle of sin: bankrupt banks, toxic television channels, corrupt procurement…’&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 369</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Rich Trumka, its president, told me that our success would strengthen labour’s voice within the Democratic Party, while Damon Silvers, the policy director, encouraged me with some wise advice: ‘They complain you are unreasonable until they realize they can’t buy you or bluff you or intimidate you. Then they really negotiate, often late at night.’ Rich showed me a sign over his desk that read, NOTHING WAS EVER ACCOMPLISHED BY A REASONABLE PERSON.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 373</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Another warm handshake, another friendly smile and he was gone.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 376</div></div><p>Obama, as ever, full of false assurances, feigned agreement and zero support for anyone or anything that doesn&rsquo;t support his ego-myth. Even when talking to someone in dire straits, he talks of his own capitulation, encouraging their own (&rdquo;we all float down here…&rdquo;). Is he evil or stupid? He doesn&rsquo;t get the luxury of being considered stupid.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;I met Jeff Sachs, who was bearing bad news: Wolfgang had managed to turn most of Washington’s establishment against us, he told me.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 379</div></div><p>I don&rsquo;t believe that Wolfgang turned them. Wolfgang is such an asshole that the only way he could get them to agree with him is if he was saying what they had already decided they wanted to hear.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;[…] was exactly what I had been thinking: to utilize David Lipton’s advice we would have to combine it with Lee Buccheit’s. We had to work on two fronts: compile our own comprehensive anti-MoU Plan for Greece while convincing Alexis to send an envoy to Berlin with the message Lee had scripted for us. It was the only way. But was it one that my exhausted comrade at Maximos would countenance?&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 380</div></div><p>You&rsquo;re drowning and you don&rsquo;t recognize it. Your party won&rsquo;t. Everyone&rsquo;s pretending to cooperate. In the face of this, you redouble your efforts, fighting on two simultaneous fronts, exhausted, and nearly alone. I have newfound respect for Jeff Sachs for sticking by you. He&rsquo;s clearly one of the good ones.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;It all made perfect sense. The troika that had been born and raised in Athens was now Paris-bound because its ultimate mission was to control the French national budget. The harsh and failed policies imposed upon Greece had nothing to do with our country. The threat to close down Greece’s banks that Benoît had been relaying to me at the very moment Michel yelled at Wolfgang had nothing to do with our banks. They were Wolfgang’s signal to Paris: if France wanted the euro, it must forfeit sovereignty over its budget deficits.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 381</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;It was an extraordinary if unsurprising act of bad faith. Having promised Alexis that the two of them would find a solution behind the scenes while Varoufakis and Schäuble cancelled each other out, [Merkel] was now hanging him out to dry.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 388</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The main number I had in mind – which had snagged my attention like a rusty nail – was 3.5. The pages were a letter signed by the Greek prime minister and addressed to the troika, committing to a budget with a primary surplus target of 3.5 per cent of national income. Unbelievably, the same number appeared next to the years 2018, 2019 … all the way to 2028. With the exceptions of Singapore and oil-rich Norway, no country in the world has ever posted a 3.5 per cent budget primary surplus for ten years in succession. The chance that a depressed economy lacking functional banks and with negative investment could do so was the nearest to the theatre of the absurd that economic policy can produce.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 392</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Beneath Alexis’s political, economic and moral error in surrendering to austerity lay another, larger error: his belief that the troika would give him a speedy agreement and a third bailout in return. Undoubtedly, Merkel and Wieser had encouraged Alexis and Chouliarakis to believe this. But setting aside the fact that we had no mandate from our voters for such an agreement, there were two reasons why not even this was on the cards. First, the creditors would surely want to make an example of Alexis – who had spent years in opposition, and some months in government, lambasting them – as a deterrent to any other politician in Spain, Italy, Portugal or indeed France who might be tempted to confront them. For this they would need not just his capitulation but his very public humiliation too. Second, the troika had been denying for years that either a third bailout loan or significant debt relief were necessary. The only way they could explain a third bailout loan now was by claiming, as Poul Thomsen had done during the Riga Eurogroup, that the Greek debt had in fact been sustainable until Syriza won government, and to prove their charge it would be necessary to close down Greece’s banks, cause massive new losses and bankruptcies and then blame the costs on Alexis’s government.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 394</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Half an hour later my phone rang again. It was Jeff, laughing uncontrollably. ‘You will not believe this, Yanis,’ he said. ‘Five minutes after we hung up, I received a call from the [US] National Security Council. They asked me if I thought you meant what you’d said! I told them that you did mean it and that, if they want to avert a default to the IMF, they’d better knock some sense into the Europeans.’ I had fully expected my phone to be tapped, but two things made Jeff’s news remarkable. First, the eavesdroppers not only had the capacity to recognize that what I had said was of real significance but they must also have had an open line to the NSC. Second, they had no compunction whatsoever about revealing they were tapping my phone!&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 396</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;But there was another French politician I met that day who truly engaged with the plan, who told me it was a good one and who encouraged me to proceed with it: Emmanuel Macron.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 404</div></div><p>The best of the worst, apparently?</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Co-signed by policymakers who combined exceptional pedigrees with experience of the highest levels of governance from across the political spectrum, it was a powerful weapon.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 406</div></div><p>God-damned if I might not have to throw Larry Summers a bit of a bone for putting his name to that document.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;‘But Wolfgang,’ I replied, still reeling at his words, ‘as responsible leaders and Europeans, we should do all we can to prevent Grexit and to offer our peoples a clear vision of a decent life within the eurozone. Pushing them to make a choice between a catastrophic fiscal policy within the eurozone and a catastrophic exit from the eurozone is not the mark of an enlightened political leadership. Don’t you see that the problem with the MoU is that it offers no hope whatsoever for a decent future?’&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 408</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;You reject my ideas; your own proposal was rejected by your chancellor, and meanwhile the negotiations between my prime minister’s team and the troika in the Brussels Group are heading in a direction that is the opposite of a solution. What should I do, Wolfgang?’ He looked up for the first time in a while and said without any enthusiasm, ‘Sign the MoU.’ We had come full circle. ‘OK,’ I said. ‘Let’s suppose I do it. Let’s assume that I sign the damned thing. Tell me this: are we not going to be in the same situation again in six or twelve months? With another funding crunch feeding GREECE ON THE VERGE AGAIN headlines, more recession, and a political backlash in the Eurogroup?’ Perking up a little, Wolfgang agreed and said, ‘This is why I told you to convince your prime minister to consider a time out.’ ‘Except that your chancellor put an end to that discussion.’ ‘Well, that leaves you with the MoU,’ he said, falling back once more on the same non-solution.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 414</div></div><p>How does one have such patience to talk endlessly in circles? I wonder how much this is due to an inability to understand or properly communicate in English with enough confidence to be certain that one is not giving away undue advantage.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;‘Would you sign the MoU if you were in my place?’ I was expecting him to give me the predictable answer – that, under the circumstances, there was no alternative – along with all the usual, senseless arguments. He didn’t. Instead he looked out of the window. By Berlin standards, it was a hot and sunny day. Then he turned and stunned me with his answer. ‘As a patriot, no. It’s bad for your people.’&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 415</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;As I departed that day, I was not leaving behind me a Machiavellian dictator; I was leaving behind a sunken heart, a man ostensibly more powerful than almost anyone in Europe who nevertheless felt utterly powerless to do what he knew was right. As the great tragedians have taught us, nothing causes greater wretchedness than the combination of supreme authority and wholesale powerlessness.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 415</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;To demonstrate the flaw, I performed a simple exercise: I asked the troika’s model to simulate the impact on the government’s revenues of raising the VAT rate from 23 per cent to 223 per cent. We all know what would happen in reality after such a ludicrous tax hike: sales would collapse and so would the government’s revenues. But not in the troika’s model, which produced a massive increase in revenues.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 417</div></div><p>That has to be a poor jest. Or a lie.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The words of caution that Jeff Sachs had once shared with me rang true: ‘These people lie. Don’t trust them.’ Still I could hardly believe that Poul could have been so blatant.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 419</div></div><p>I guess Yanis&rsquo;s honesty is refreshing, but his naiveté is disheartening.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The situation was truly absurd: a left-wing finance minister representing Syriza, the Alliance of the Radical Left, was arguing like a Reaganite Republican in favour of lower tax rates, including for business, against supposedly neoliberal functionaries insisting on increasing them. It was a sure sign that this negotiation had no basis in economics.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 419</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Meanwhile, Jeff Sachs was sending me urgent warnings: ‘They demand an SLA first, promising talks about debt relief and the like later. But they lie! Once you give them the SLA they will deny they ever promised you anything. Don’t fall for it!’ How could I tell Jeff that I no longer had Alexis’s ear? That he seemed compelled to go inexorably down that path?&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 425</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Christine looked off-colour. It later transpired that the previous night the IMF had been pressured into withholding its latest sustainability analysis of Greece’s debt. No doubt the reason was that, as the New York Times reported, ‘having run the numbers, the fund now accepted the central argument being made by Mr Varoufakis: Greece was bankrupt and needed debt relief from Europe to survive.’&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 441</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Greece was, and unfortunately remains, a laboratory where the destructive powers of extend-and-pretend loans plus self-defeating austerity were tried and tested. Greece is a battleground on which a war against European democracy, against French democracy, is tried and tested. Greece was never the issue for the troika and its minions. You are! This is why I am here. I am here because what happened to us is beginning to happen to you.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 483</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Even some who sympathize with DiEM25’s pan-Europeanism dismiss it as utopian. But allow me, dear reader, to share a strongly held belief as my parting shot: our movement may be utopian, but its policy of constructive disobedience within the EU, of being both in and against this illiberal and anti-democratic Europe, is the only practical alternative to the dystopia unfolding as Europe disintegrates. That was my stance as Greece’s finance minister. It remains my stance today.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 485</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Despite its spectacular predictive blunder Greece proved a nice little earner for the IMF. By the time I resigned, the bankrupt state had paid over €3.5 billion in interest and fees to the IMF, averaging 37 per cent of IMF total net income, and covering 79 per cent of its total internal expenses. Ever since Greece entered debtors’ prison, the IMF has had an average operating profit of 63 per cent, much larger than that of Goldman Sachs or J.P. Morgan. And where have the IMF’s profits come from? Europe’s taxpayers, of course.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 491</div></div>      </div>
      </div>
        <div class="footer">
    <div class="footer-data"><div class="footer-links"><ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/contact.php" title="">Contact</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/support.php" title="">Support</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/privacy.php" title="">Privacy</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/rights.php" title="">Rights</a></li></ul></div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="copyright">Copyright (c) 1999-2026 earthli.com. All Rights Reserved.</div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="versions">Powered by <ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore/app_news.php">earthli News 3.7</a></li><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore" title="">earthli WebCore&trade; 3.7</a></li></ul></div></div>    </div>
      </div>
  </div>  </body>
</html>
]]>
  </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
      <title type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[Margaret Atwood: the Price of Fame]]>
  </title>
    <id>https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3539</id>
    <link href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3539"/>
    <updated>2018-04-08T12:31:17+02:00</updated>
    <author>
        <name type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[Marco von Ballmoos]]>
  </name>
      <uri>https://earthli.com/users/marco</uri>
    </author>
      <summary type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<p>Margaret Atwood published <em>The Handmaid&rsquo;s Tale</em> in 1985 (I <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3134">read it in 2015</a>). Last year, Hulu aired a television series based on the book.</p>
<p>So, now, poor Margaret is famous, taking opprobrium from the new feminists who hadn&rsquo;t even been born when Atwood was already fighting for women&rsquo;s rights. She is... [<a class="complete-text-link" href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3539">More</a>]</p>
]]>
  </summary>
      <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<html lang="en">
  <head>
    <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/themes/ice.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/fonts/raleway.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/core/medium.css">
  </head>
  <body>
<div class="style-controls">  <div class="page">
    <div class="page-body">
<div class="info-box-top">
<p>
Published by <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_user.php?name=marco" title="Marco von Ballmoos" class="visible">marco</a> on <span class="date-time">8. Apr 2018 12:31:17 (GMT-5)</span>
</p>
</div>
      <div class="text-flow wide">
  <p>Margaret Atwood published <em>The Handmaid&rsquo;s Tale</em> in 1985 (I <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3134">read it in 2015</a>). Last year, Hulu aired a television series based on the book.</p>
<p>So, now, poor Margaret is famous, taking opprobrium from the new feminists who hadn&rsquo;t even been born when Atwood was already fighting for women&rsquo;s rights. She is also in rarified company: since a TV show now accompanies her book, she can be thrown into a list alongside <em>Fifty Shades Freed</em> (the last entry in the well-known feminist trilogy), the latest <em>Maze Runner</em> book and <em>The Girl in the Spider&rsquo;s Web</em>, which extends the universe created in Stieg Larsson&rsquo;s Millennium Series (that includes <em>Girl with the Dragon Tattoo</em>), a universe that was decent, but didn&rsquo;t really need extending.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.earthli.com/data/news/attachments/entry/3539/poor_margaret_atwood._seriously,_what_did_she_do_to_deserve_this_.png"><img src="https://www.earthli.com/data/news/attachments/entry/3539/poor_margaret_atwood._seriously,_what_did_she_do_to_deserve_this_.png" alt=" " style="width: 669px"></a></p>
<p>I was a bit surprised to see the NYC Public Library using the criteria &ldquo;books from which audio-visual media have been produced&rdquo; to come up with a list of recommendations for me. What did poor Margaret do to deserve this? She became popular, I guess. I imagine if Raskolnikov were to get his own TV series, Dostoyevsky would be consigned to the same fate of lining up with the latest YA authors and comic-book-movie novelizations.</p>
      </div>
      </div>
        <div class="footer">
    <div class="footer-data"><div class="footer-links"><ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/contact.php" title="">Contact</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/support.php" title="">Support</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/privacy.php" title="">Privacy</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/rights.php" title="">Rights</a></li></ul></div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="copyright">Copyright (c) 1999-2026 earthli.com. All Rights Reserved.</div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="versions">Powered by <ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore/app_news.php">earthli News 3.7</a></li><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore" title="">earthli WebCore&trade; 3.7</a></li></ul></div></div>    </div>
      </div>
  </div>  </body>
</html>
]]>
  </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
      <title type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[The Ministry of Utmost Happiness by Arundhati Roy (2017) (read in 2018)]]>
  </title>
    <id>https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3522</id>
    <link href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3522"/>
    <updated>2018-02-18T16:22:38+01:00</updated>
    <author>
        <name type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[Marco von Ballmoos]]>
  </name>
      <uri>https://earthli.com/users/marco</uri>
    </author>
      <summary type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<blockquote class="quote abstract "><div>Disclaimer: these are notes I took while reading this book. They include citations I found interesting or enlightening or particularly well-written. In some cases, I&rsquo;ve pointed out which of these applies to which citation; in others, I have not. Any benefit you gain from reading these notes is... [<a class="complete-text-link" href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3522">More</a>]</div></blockquote>]]>
  </summary>
      <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<html lang="en">
  <head>
    <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/themes/ice.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/fonts/raleway.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/core/medium.css">
  </head>
  <body>
<div class="style-controls">  <div class="page">
    <div class="page-body">
<div class="info-box-top">
<p>
Published by <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_user.php?name=marco" title="Marco von Ballmoos" class="visible">marco</a> on <span class="date-time">18. Feb 2018 16:22:38 (GMT-5)</span>
</p>
</div>
      <div class="text-flow wide">
  <blockquote class="quote abstract "><div>Disclaimer: these are notes I took while reading this book. They include citations I found interesting or enlightening or particularly well-written. In some cases, I&rsquo;ve pointed out which of these applies to which citation; in others, I have not. Any benefit you gain from reading these notes is purely incidental to the purpose they serve of reminding me what I once read. Please see Wikipedia for a summary if I&rsquo;ve failed to provide one sufficient for your purposes. If my notes serve to trigger an interest in this book, then I&rsquo;m happy for you.</div></blockquote><p>This is a story of Kashmir. It is a story of the downtrodden peoples of India, of the second-class quasi-citizens, of those at the edges of society who actually make up the large part of India&rsquo;s population. It is a story of those left behind, those ignored, those who protest the status quo, the communists, the Marxists, the Maoists, who cry for justice for all.</p>
<p>It is a story of fiction that starts off in the poorest neighborhoods of Delhi where a young girl is born in a boy&rsquo;s body. She has both parts and must decide which to keep. She names herself Anjum and moves into a community of fellow travelers, making a living in this community.</p>
<p>There is the starving professional, professorial protester, Dr. Azad Bharatiya. There is a man who named himself Saddam Hussein. There are four university friends who go their separate ways, crossing paths again and again throughout the dingy, evil history of India&rsquo;s occupation of Kashmir. S. Tilottama is a reclusive young architect who doesn&rsquo;t work as an architect. Garson Hobart (Biplab Dasgupta) works in the Indian secret service, helping her out from time to time as well as being her landlord in latter years. Musa Yeswi drifts into the Kashmir conflict on the side of the militants, rising through the ranks—but only after his wife and daughter are killed by casual, careless Indian troops firing indiscriminately into a crowd out of fear at an exploding drinks container. His daughter is Miss Jebeen the first. And, finally, there is the rudderless and therefore successful &ldquo;journalist&rdquo; Nagaraj Hariharan, to whom Tilo is married for years, though her affair with Musa continues throughout. It&rsquo;s complicated.</p>
<p>Garson tells the story retrospectively, having moved back into the apartment that he&rsquo;d rented to Tilo after she&rsquo;d left for Anjum&rsquo;s compound built on a graveyard, where she finally finds peace and happiness in a community that includes her &ldquo;daughter&rdquo; Miss Jebeen the second. Garson goes through all of Tilo&rsquo;s notes about Musa&rsquo;s activities but, instead of using it against them all in his capacity of high-level Indian secret-service operative, he becomes convinced of Kashmir&rsquo;s side of the argument—that India should remove itself and leave them people free.</p>
<p>The story is told out of order (as was <em>The God of Small Things</em>) and most of the people lead very unorthodox lives. Roy is highly critical of the direction of Indian society, highly critical of the rules-that-be, of the duplicitous middle class. The path that India has take is similar to that taken by the US: the historical and cultural racism of the caste system has the same disastrous effect as the endemic racism in America.</p>
<h2>Citations</h2><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Then came Partition. God’s carotid burst open on the new border between India and Pakistan and a million people died of hatred. Neighbors turned on each other as though they’d never known each other, never been to each other’s weddings, never sung each other’s songs.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 17</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;What escaped them was that the couplet was a sly snack, a perfidious samosa, a warning wrapped in mourning, being offered with faux humility by an erudite man who had absolute faith in his listeners’ ignorance of Urdu, a language which, like most of those who spoke it, was gradually being ghettoized.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 19</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;numbers of the Bird Hospital, Phoolan Devi, the surrendered dacoit&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 30</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;her from Iraq where he seemed to have decided to live.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 76</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Around her the city sprawled for miles. Thousand-year-old sorceress, dozing, but not asleep, even at this hour. Gray flyovers snaked out of her Medusa skull, tangling and untangling under the yellow sodium haze. Sleeping bodies of homeless people lined their high, narrow pavements, head to toe, head to toe, head to toe, looping into the distance. Old secrets were folded into the furrows of her loose, parchment skin. Each wrinkle was a street, each street a carnival. Each arthritic joint a crumbling amphitheater where stories of love and madness, stupidity, delight and unspeakable cruelty had been played out for centuries. But this was to be the dawn of her resurrection. Her new masters wanted to hide her knobby, varicose veins under imported fishnet stockings, cram her withered tits into saucy padded bras and jam her aching feet into pointed high-heeled shoes. They wanted her to swing her stiff old hips and re-route the edges of her grimace upwards into a frozen, empty smile. It was the summer Grandma became a whore.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 100</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The passengers looked out of their car windows and saw only the new apartment they planned to buy, the Jacuzzi they had just installed and the ink that was still wet on the sweetheart deal they had just closed. They were calm from their meditation classes and glowing from yoga practice.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 104</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The summer of the city’s resurrection had also been the summer of scams—coal scams, iron-ore scams, housing scams, insurance scams, stamp-paper scams, phone-license scams, land scams, dam scams, irrigation scams, arms and ammunition scams, petrol-pump scams, polio-vaccine scams, electricity-bill scams, school-book scams, God Men scams, drought-relief scams, car-number-plate scams, voter-list scams, identity-card scams—in which politicians, businessmen, businessmen-politicians and politician-businessmen had made off with unimaginable quantities of public money.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 105</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Gulabiya would lose his job in the morning. Thousands like him would line up hoping to replace him. (One might even be the street poet himself.) But for now, Gulabiya slept soundly and dreamed deep. In his dream he had enough money to feed himself and send a little home to his family in his village. In his dream his village still existed. It wasn’t at the bottom of a dam reservoir. Fish didn’t swim through his windows. Crocodiles didn’t knife through the high branches of the Silk Cotton trees. Tourists didn’t go boating over his fields, leaving rainbow clouds of diesel in the sky.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 116</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Ironically both of them were on the pavement that night to escape their past and all that had circumscribed their lives so far. And yet, in order to arm themselves for battle, they retreated right back into what they sought to escape, into what they were used to, into what they really were.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 125</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;I don’t want dollars. Capitalism is like poisoned honey. People swarm to it like bees. I don’t go to it.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 133</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;maader chod behen chod maa ki choot behen ka lauda. (Urdu for &ldquo;Motherfucker sisterfucker your mother’s cunt your sister’s cock.&rdquo;)&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 128</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;I feel a rush of anger at those grumbling intellectuals and professional dissenters who constantly carp about this great country. Frankly, they can only do it because they are allowed to. And they are allowed to because, for all our imperfections, we are a genuine democracy. I would not be crass enough to say this too often in public, but the truth is that it gives me great pride to be a servant of the Government of India.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 151</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Normality in our part of the world is a bit like a boiled egg: its humdrum surface conceals at its heart a yolk of egregious violence. It is our constant anxiety about that violence, our memory of its past labors and our dread of its future manifestations, that lays down the rules for how a people as complex and as diverse as we are continue to coexist—continue to live together, tolerate each other and, from time to time, murder one another. As long as the center holds, as long as the yolk doesn’t run, we’ll be fine. In moments of crisis it helps to take the long view.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 154</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;It was as though the Apparition whose presence we in India are all constantly and acutely aware of had suddenly surfaced, snarling, from the deep, and had behaved exactly as we expected it to. Once its appetite was sated it sank back into its subterranean lair and normality closed over it. Maddened killers retracted their fangs and returned to their daily chores—as clerks, tailors, plumbers, carpenters, shopkeepers—life went on as before.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 154</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The complete absence of a desire to please, or to put someone at their ease, could, in a less vulnerable person, have been construed as arrogance. In her it came across as a kind of reckless aloneness. Behind her plain, unfashionable spectacles, her slightly slanting cat-eyes had the insouciant secretiveness of a pyromaniac. She gave the impression that she had somehow slipped off her leash. As though she was taking herself for a walk while the rest of us were being walked—like pets. As though she was watching considerately, somewhat absent-mindedly, from a distance, while we minced along, grateful to our owners, happy to perpetuate our bondage.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 158</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;(Irresponsible, virulently anti-India dailies that exaggerated body counts and got their facts wrong had their uses too—they undermined the local media in general and made it easier for us to tar them all with the same brush. To tell you the truth, we even funded some of them.)&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 176</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;She remembered reading somewhere that even after people died, their hair and nails kept growing. Like starlight, traveling through the universe long after the stars themselves had died. Like cities. Fizzy, effervescent, simulating the illusion of life while the planet they had plundered died around them.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 218</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;She remembered reading somewhere that even after people died, their hair and nails kept growing. Like starlight, traveling through the universe long after the stars themselves had died. Like cities. Fizzy, effervescent, simulating the illusion of life while the planet they had plundered died around them. She thought of the city at night, of cities at night. Discarded constellations of old stars, fallen from the sky, rearranged on Earth in patterns and pathways and towers. Invaded by weevils that have learned to walk upright.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 218</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;In the matter of the Martyrs’ Graveyard, however, the question of whether the first grave contained a bag or a body turned out to be of no real consequence. The substantive truth was that a relatively new graveyard was filling up, with real bodies, at an alarming pace.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 318</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;As wars go, this was only a small one. Nobody paid much attention. So it went on and on. So it folded and unfolded over decades, gathering people into its unhinged embrace. Its cruelties became as natural as the changing seasons, each came with its own unique range of scent and blossom, its own cycle of loss and renewal, disruption and normalcy, uprisings and elections.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 332</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;It was late afternoon when the bus emerged from the long tunnel that bored through the mountains, the only link between India and Kashmir. Autumn in the Valley was the season of immodest abundance. The sun slanted down on the lavender haze of zaffran crocuses in bloom. Orchards were heavy with fruit, the Chinar trees were on fire.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 353</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;I was washing at night in the courtyard, Harsh stars shone in the sky. Starlight, like salt on an ax-head— The rain-butt was brim-full and frozen. “What’s a rain-butt? Don’t know…must check.” The gates are locked, And the earth in all conscience is bleak. There’s scarcely anything more basic and pure Than truth’s clean canvas. A star melts, like salt, in the barrel And the freezing water is blacker, Death cleaner, misfortune saltier, And the earth more truthful, more awful. “Another Kashmiri poet.” “Russian Kashmiri,” Tilo said. “He died in a prison camp, during Stalin’s Gulag. His ode to Stalin wasn’t considered sincere enough.” She regretted reading the poem.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 375</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;“You know what the hardest thing for us is? The hardest thing to fight? Pity. It’s so easy for us to pity ourselves…such terrible things have happened to our people…in every single household something terrible has happened…but self-pity is so…so debilitating. So humiliating. More than Azadi, now it’s a fight for dignity. And the only way we can hold on to our dignity is to fight back. Even if we lose. Even if we die. But for that we as a people—as an ordinary people—have to become a fighting force…an army. To do that we have to simplify ourselves, standardize ourselves, reduce ourselves…everyone has to think the same way, want the same thing…we have to do away with our complexities, our differences, our absurdities, our nuances…we have to make ourselves as single-minded…as monolithic…as stupid…as the army we face. But they’re professionals, and we are just people. This is the worst part of the Occupation…what it makes us do to ourselves. This reduction, this standardization, this stupidification…&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 376</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The same depthless, blank, black eyes that had pretended to laugh about pretending to forget his pistol in Musa’s home now stared at Tilo in the moonlit bog. That gaze called forth something in her blood—a mute rage, a stubborn, suicidal impulse. A stupid resolve that she would say nothing, no matter what.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 385</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;When the women found out that Tilo was there for what was called MTP—Medical Termination of Pregnancy—they could not hide their hostility and disgust. The doctors too were disapproving. She listened to their lectures impassively. When she made it clear that she would not change her mind, they said they could not give her general anesthetic unless there was somebody with her to sign the consent form, preferably the father of the child. She told them to do it without anesthetic. She passed out with the pain and woke in the general ward. Someone else was with her in the bed. A child, with a kidney disorder, screaming in pain. There was more than one patient in every bed. There were patients on the floor, most of the visitors and family members who were crowded around them looked just as ill. Harried doctors and nurses picked their way through the chaos. It was like a wartime ward. Except that in Delhi there was no war other than the usual one—the war of the rich against the poor.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 398</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The steel bubble floated on, past shanty towns and industrial swamps where the air was a pale mauve haze, past railway tracks packed thick with trash and lined with slums. Finally they arrived at their destination. The Edge. Where the countryside was trying, quickly, clumsily and tragically, to turn itself into the city.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 415</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;We circled around the subject of Kashmir, but only in abstract ways. “You may be right after all,” I said to him in the kitchen. “You may be right, but you’ll never win.” “I think the opposite,” he smiled, stirring the pot from which a wonderful aroma of rogan josh arose. “We may turn out to be wrong, but we have already won.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 437</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;“One day Kashmir will make India self-destruct in the same way. You may have blinded all of us, every one of us, with your pellet guns by then. But you will still have eyes to see what you have done to us. You’re not destroying us. You are constructing us. It’s yourselves that you are destroying. Khuda Hafiz, Garson bhai.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 439</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;He would leave for Kashmir the next morning, to return to a new phase in an old war from which, this time, he would not return. He would die the way he wanted to, with his Asal boot on. He would be buried the way he wanted to be—a faceless man in a nameless grave. The younger men who would take his place would be harder, narrower and less forgiving. They would be more likely to win any war they fought, because they belonged to a generation that had known nothing but war.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 443</div></div>      </div>
      </div>
        <div class="footer">
    <div class="footer-data"><div class="footer-links"><ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/contact.php" title="">Contact</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/support.php" title="">Support</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/privacy.php" title="">Privacy</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/rights.php" title="">Rights</a></li></ul></div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="copyright">Copyright (c) 1999-2026 earthli.com. All Rights Reserved.</div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="versions">Powered by <ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore/app_news.php">earthli News 3.7</a></li><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore" title="">earthli WebCore&trade; 3.7</a></li></ul></div></div>    </div>
      </div>
  </div>  </body>
</html>
]]>
  </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
      <title type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[The God of Small Things by Arundhati Roy (1997) (read in 2018)]]>
  </title>
    <id>https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3513</id>
    <link href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3513"/>
    <updated>2018-02-18T16:16:00+01:00</updated>
    <author>
        <name type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[Marco von Ballmoos]]>
  </name>
      <uri>https://earthli.com/users/marco</uri>
    </author>
      <summary type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<blockquote class="quote abstract "><div>Disclaimer: these are notes I took while reading this book. They include citations I found interesting or enlightening or particularly well-written. In some cases, I&rsquo;ve pointed out which of these applies to which citation; in others, I have not. Any benefit you gain from reading these notes is... [<a class="complete-text-link" href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3513">More</a>]</div></blockquote>]]>
  </summary>
      <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<html lang="en">
  <head>
    <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/themes/ice.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/fonts/raleway.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/core/medium.css">
  </head>
  <body>
<div class="style-controls">  <div class="page">
    <div class="page-body">
<div class="info-box-top">
<p>
Published by <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_user.php?name=marco" title="Marco von Ballmoos" class="visible">marco</a> on <span class="date-time">18. Feb 2018 16:16:00 (GMT-5)</span>
</p>
</div>
      <div class="text-flow wide">
  <blockquote class="quote abstract "><div>Disclaimer: these are notes I took while reading this book. They include citations I found interesting or enlightening or particularly well-written. In some cases, I&rsquo;ve pointed out which of these applies to which citation; in others, I have not. Any benefit you gain from reading these notes is purely incidental to the purpose they serve of reminding me what I once read. Please see Wikipedia for a summary if I&rsquo;ve failed to provide one sufficient for your purposes. If my notes serve to trigger an interest in this book, then I&rsquo;m happy for you.</div></blockquote><p>This is a chronological jumble of images from the lives of a family in Kerala that languorously focuses to a story about India itself and its age-old problem with caste—with its inherent and deeply seated racism. The focus is on two time periods: the 50s and the 80s. In the 50s, a pair of odd twins (Rahel and Estha) are young and precocious. They eagerly await the arrival of another young girl (Sophie Mol) from England, with her mother. Her mother (Margaret) had divorced their uncle many years before.</p>
<p>Their uncle Chacko is a frustrated anglophile and faux-Communist. There are real communists (Comrade K. N. M. Pillai) in this story, there are untouchables. There are older generations whose story is told as well—of their upbringing in an even-more unforgiving world than the already-awful late 60s/early 70s in India. This is long after Partition, but still enemies are everywhere and anti-Communism rides high.</p>
<p>In the late 60s, the twins befriend and untouchable (Velutha) who is older than they. He is more their mother&rsquo;s (Ammu) age—and those two become lovers. The family, deep-set in their racist ways, cannot abide this and punishes her. They send her away; she dies young. The children are scattered to the winds, only to return years later to the poisoned home, still run by the same inbred-thinking people who&rsquo;d chased everyone away to protect themselves and their pitiful reputations (Baby Kochama and her erstwhile compatriot. Estha hasn&rsquo;t spoken in years; Rahel drags around a lifetime of bad decisions, including a divorced husband in the States.</p>
<p>They all mostly live short, brutish lives of quiet desperation in a country that has no plan or pity for most of the people who live in it. Roy&rsquo;s prose is beautiful at times, describing an India whose heart is decayed—and whose outward appearance becomes increasingly so.</p>
<h2>Citations</h2><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Heaven opened and the water hammered down, reviving the reluctant old well, greenmossing the pigless pigsty, carpet bombing still, tea-colored puddles the way memory bombs still, tea-colored minds. The grass looked wetgreen and pleased. Happy earthworms frolicked purple in the slush. Green nettles nodded. Trees bent.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 11</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Past the new, freshly baked, iced, Gulf-money houses built by nurses, masons, wire-benders and bank clerks, who worked hard and unhappily in faraway places. Past the resentful older houses tinged green with envy, cowering in their private driveways among their private rubber trees. Each a tottering fiefdom with an epic of its own.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 14</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;“But we can’t go in,” Chacko explained, “because we’ve been locked out. And when we look in through the windows, all we see are shadows. And when we try and listen, all we hear is a whispering. And we cannot understand the whispering, because our minds have been invaded by a war. A war that we have won and lost. The very worst sort of war. A war that captures dreams and re-dreams them. A war that has made us adore our conquerors and despise ourselves.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 52</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Mammachi told Estha and Rahel that she could remember a time, in her girlhood, when Paravans were expected to crawl backwards with a broom, sweeping away their footprints so that Brahmins or Syrian Christians would not defile themselves by accidentally stepping into a Paravano footprint. In Mammachi’s time, Paravans, like other Untouchables, were not allowed to walk on public roads, not allowed to cover their upper bodies, not allowed to carry umbrellas. They had to put their hands over their mouths when they spoke, to divert their polluted breath away from those whom they addressed.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 71</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Apart from his carpentry skills, Velutha had a way with machines. Mammachi (with impenetrable Touchable logic) often said that if only he hadn’t been a Paravan, he might have become an engineer.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 72</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;You must demand what is rightfully yours. Yearly bonus. Provident fund. Accident insurance.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 114</div></div><p>Rightfully? Odd for a communist. Should be demanding shares rather than crumbs.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Comrade K. N. M. Pillai never came out openly against Chacko. Whenever he referred to him in his speeches he was careful to strip him of any human attributes and present him as an abstract functionary in some larger scheme. A theoretical construct. A pawn in the monstrous bourgeois plot to subvert the revolution. He never referred to him by name, but always as “the Management.” As though Chacko was many people. Apart from it being tactically the right thing to do, this disjunction between the man and his job helped Comrade Pillai to keep his conscience clear about his own private business dealings with Chacko. His contract for printing the Paradise Pickles labels gave him an income that he badly needed. He told himself that Chacko-the-client and Chacko-the-Management were two different people. Quite separate of course from Chacko-the-Comrade.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 115</div></div><p>The devious communist who, above all, looks out for number one.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;They dreamed of their river. Of the coconut trees that bent into it and watched, with coconut eyes, the boats slide by. Upstream in the mornings. Downstream in the evenings. And the dull, sullen sound of the boatmen’s bamboo poles as they thudded against the dark, oiled boatwood. It was warm, the water. Graygreen. Like rippled silk. With fish in it. With the sky and trees in it. And at night, the broken yellow moon in it.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 116</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Despite the fact that it was June, and raining, the river was no more than a swollen drain now. A thin ribbon of thick water that lapped wearily at the mud banks on either side, sequined with the occasional silver slant of a dead fish. It was choked with a succulent weed, whose furred brown roots waved like thin tentacles underwater. Bronze-winged lily-trotters walked across it. Splay-footed, cautious. Once it had had the power to evoke fear. To change lives. But now its teeth were drawn, its spirit spent. It was just a slow, sludging green ribbon lawn that ferried fetid garbage to the sea. Bright plastic bags blew across its viscous, weedy surface like subtropical flying-flowers.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 118</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Upstream, clean mothers washed clothes and pots in unadulterated factory effluents. People bathed. Severed torsos soaping themselves, arranged like dark busts on a thin, rocking, ribbon lawn.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 119</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;So they went ahead and plugged their smelly paradise— God’s Own Country they called it in their brochures—because they knew, those clever Hotel People, that smelliness, like other peoples’ poverty, was merely a matter of getting used to. A question of discipline. Of Rigor and Air-conditioning. Nothing more.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 120</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The old colonial bungalow with its deep verandah and Doric columns, was surrounded by smaller, older, wooden houses—ancestral homes—that the hotel chain had bought from old families and transplanted in the Heart of Darkness. Toy Histories for rich tourists to play in. Like the sheaves of rice in Joseph’s dream, like a press of eager natives petitioning an English magistrate, the old houses had been arranged around the History House in attitudes of deference. “Heritage,” the hotel was called.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 120</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;In the evenings (for that Regional Flavor) the tourists were treated to truncated kathakali performances (“Small attention spans,” the Hotel People explained to the dancers). So ancient stories were collapsed and amputated. Six-hour classics were slashed to twenty-minute cameos. The performances were staged by the swimming pool. While the drummers drummed and the dancers danced, hotel guests frolicked with their children in the water. While Kunti revealed her secret to Kama on the riverbank, courting couples rubbed suntan oil on each other. While fathers played sublimated sexual games with their nubile teenaged daughters, Poothana suckled young Krishna at her poisoned breast. Bhima disemboweled Dushasana and bathed Draupadi’s hair in his blood.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 121</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The slow ceiling fan sliced the thick, frightened air into an unending spiral that spun slowly to the floor like the peeled skin of an endless potato.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 126</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;“Mostly sweeper class,” Baby Kochamma said grimly, and looked away while a mother, not wanting to give up her Good Place near the railing, aimed her distracted baby’s penis into an empty bottle while he smiled and waved at the people around him. “Sssss…” his mother hissed. First persuasively, then savagely. But her baby thought he was the pope. He smiled and waved and smiled and waved. With his penis in a bottle.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 132</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Then the Bombay-Cochin people came out. From the cool air into the hot air. Crumpled people uncrumpled on their way to the Arrivals Lounge. And there they were, the Foreign Returnees, in wash’n’wear suits and rainbow sunglasses. With an end to grinding poverty in their Aristocrat suitcases. With cement roofs for their thatched houses, and geysers for their parents’ bathrooms. With sewage systems and septic tanks. Maxis and high heels. Puff sleeves and lipstick. Mixy-grinders and automatic flashes for their cameras.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 134</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;And the Air was full of Thoughts and Things to Say. But at times like these, only the Small Things are ever said. The Big Things lurk unsaid inside.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 136</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;It was a grand old house, the Ayemenem House, but aloof-looking. As though it had little to do with the people who lived in it. Like an old man with rheumy eyes watching children play, seeing only transience in their shrill elation and their wholehearted commitment to life.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 157</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;She had short, thick forearms, fingers like cocktail sausages, and a broad fleshy nose with flared nostrils. Deep folds of skin connected her nose to either side of her chin, and separated that section of her face from the rest of it, like a snout. Her head was too large for her body. She looked like a bottled fetus that had escaped from its jar of formaldehyde in a Biology lab and unshriveled and thickened with age.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 162</div></div><p>Just brutal. A nearly perfectly ungenerous description of an odious woman.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;when Rahel told her that an American astronaut called Neil Armstrong had walked on the moon, she laughed sarcastically and said that a Malayali acrobat called O. Muthachen had done handsprings on the sun. With pencils up his nose. She was prepared to concede that Americans existed, though she’d never seen one. She was even prepared to believe that Neil Armstrong might conceivably even be some absurd kind of name. But the walking on the moon bit? No sir.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 162</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The man standing in the shade of the rubber trees with coins of sunshine dancing on his body, holding her daughter in his arms, glanced up and caught Ammu’s gaze. Centuries telescoped into one evanescent moment. History was wrong-footed, caught off guard. Sloughed off like an old snakeskin. Its marks, its scars, its wounds from old wars and the walking-backwards days, all fell away. In its absence it left an aura, a palpable shimmering that was as plain to see as the water in a river or the sun in the sky. As plain to feel as the heat on a hot day, or the tug of a fish on a taut line. So obvious that no one noticed.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 167</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;“Let’s leave one alive so that it can be lonely,” Sophie Mol suggested.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Talking about ants that they&#039;re crushing by <cite>Sophie Mol</cite></div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Margaret Kochamma’s tiny, ordered life relinquished itself to this truly baroque bedlam with the quiet gasp of a warm body entering a chilly sea.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 232</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;She had never before met a man who spoke of the world—of what it was, and how it came to be, or what he thought would become of it—in the way in which other men she knew discussed their jobs, their friends or their weekends at the beach.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 233</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;She saw it as God’s Way of punishing Ammu for her sins and simultaneously avenging her (Baby Kochamma’s) humiliation at the hands of Velutha and the men in the march—the Modalali Mariakutty taunts, the forced flagwaving. She set sail at once. A ship of goodness ploughing through a sea of sin.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 243</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Inspector Thomas Mathew, receding behind his bustling Air India mustache, understood perfectly. He had a Touchable wife, two Touchable daughters—whole Touchable generations waiting in their Touchable wombs&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 245</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;“You people,” Inspector Thomas Mathew said, “first you spoil these people, carry them about on your head like trophies, then when they misbehave you come running to us for help.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 247</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Both in their own way truly, terrifyingly adult. They looked out at the world and never wondered how it worked, because they knew They worked it. They were mechanics who serviced different parts of the same machine.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 248</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;It is unreasonable to expect a person to remember what she didn’t know had happened.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 251</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;“Nothing specifically as such,” Comrade K. N. M. Pillai said. “But see, comrade, any benefits that you give him, naturally others are resenting it. They see it as a partiality. After all, whatever job he does, carpenter or electrician or whateveritis, for them he is just a Paravan. It is a conditioning they have from birth. This I myself have told them is wrong. But frankly speaking, comrade, Change is one thing. Acceptance is another. You should be cautious. Better for him you send him off.” “My dear fellow,” Chacko said, “that’s impossible. He’s invaluable. He practically runs the factory—and we can’t solve the problem by sending all the Paravans away. Surely we have to learn to deal with this nonsense.” Comrade Pillai disliked being addressed as My Dear Fellow. It sounded to him like an insult couched in good English, which, of course, made it a double-insult—the insult itself, and the fact that Chacko thought he wouldn’t understand it. It spoiled his mood completely. “That may be,” he said caustically. “But Rome was not built in a day. Keep it in mind, comrade, that this is not your Oxford college. For you what is a nonsense for Masses it is something different.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 264</div></div><p>Here, the man of the people argues for patience while the capitalist is already past it.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Chacko said. “I am going to formally organize them into a union. They will elect their own representatives.” “But comrade, you cannot stage their revolution for them. You can only create awareness. Educate them. They must launch their own struggle. They must overcome their fears.” “Of whom?” Chacko smiled. “Me?” “No, not you, my dear comrade. Of centuries of oppression.” Then Comrade Pillai, in a hectoring voice, quoted Chairman Mao. In Malayalam. His expression curiously like his niece’s. “Revolution is not a dinner party. Revolution is an insurrection, an act of violence in which one class overthrows another.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 265</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The policemen stopped and fanned out. They didn’t really need to, but they liked these Touchable games. They positioned themselves strategically. Crouching by the broken, low stone boundary wall. Quick Piss. Hotfoam on warmstone. Police-piss. Drowned ants in yellow bubbly. Deep breaths. Then together, on their knees and elbows, they crept towards the house. Like Film-policemen. Softly, softly through the grass. Batons in their hands. Machine guns in their minds. Responsibility for the Touchable Future on their thin but able shoulders.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 291</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;They heard the thud of wood on flesh. Boot on bone. On teeth. The muffled grunt when a stomach is kicked in. The muted crunch of skull on cement. The gurgle of blood on a man’s breath when his lung is torn by the jagged end of a broken rib. Blue-lipped and dinner-plate-eyed, they watched, mesmerized by something that they sensed but didn’t understand: the absence of caprice in what the policemen did. The abyss where anger should have been. The sober, steady brutality, the economy of it all. They were opening a bottle. Or shutting a tap. Cracking an egg to make an omelette. The twins were too young to know that these were only history’s henchmen. Sent to square the books and collect the dues from those who broke its laws. Impelled by feelings that were primal yet paradoxically wholly impersonal. Feelings of contempt born of inchoate, unacknowledged fear—civilization’s fear of nature, men’s fear of women, power’s fear of powerlessness. Man’s subliminal urge to destroy what he could neither subdue nor deify.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 292</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;If they hurt Velutha more than they intended to, it was only because any kinship, any connection between themselves and him, any implication that if nothing else, at least biologically he was a fellow creature—had been severed long ago. They were not arresting a man, they were exorcising fear. They had no instrument to calibrate how much punishment he could take. No means of gauging how much or how permanently they had damaged him.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 293</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;His skull was fractured in three places. His nose and both his cheekbones were smashed, leaving his face pulpy, undefined. The blow to his mouth had split open his upper lip and broken six teeth, three of which were embedded in his lower lip, hideously inverting his beautiful smile. Four of his ribs were splintered, one had pierced his left lung, which was what made him bleed from his mouth. The blood on his breath bright red. Fresh. Frothy. His lower intestine was ruptured and hemorrhaged, the blood collected in his abdominal cavity. His spine was damaged in two places, the concussion had paralyzed his right arm and resulted in a loss of control over his bladder and rectum. Both his kneecaps were shattered. Still they brought out the handcuffs.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 294</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;On the roof of the abandoned factory, the lonely drummer drummed. A gauze door slammed. A mouse rushed across the factory floor. Cobwebs sealed old pickle vats. Empty, all but one—in which a small heap of congealed white dust lay. Bone dust from a Bar Nowl. Long dead. Pickledowl.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 311</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;As she watched him she understood the quality of his beauty. How his labor had shaped him. How the wood he fashioned had fashioned him. Each plank he planed, each nail he drove, each thing he made had molded him. Had left its stamp on him. Had given him his strength, his supple grace.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 316</div></div>      </div>
      </div>
        <div class="footer">
    <div class="footer-data"><div class="footer-links"><ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/contact.php" title="">Contact</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/support.php" title="">Support</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/privacy.php" title="">Privacy</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/rights.php" title="">Rights</a></li></ul></div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="copyright">Copyright (c) 1999-2026 earthli.com. All Rights Reserved.</div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="versions">Powered by <ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore/app_news.php">earthli News 3.7</a></li><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore" title="">earthli WebCore&trade; 3.7</a></li></ul></div></div>    </div>
      </div>
  </div>  </body>
</html>
]]>
  </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
      <title type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[The Stone Sky by N. K. Jemisin (2017) (read in 2018)]]>
  </title>
    <id>https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3507</id>
    <link href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3507"/>
    <updated>2018-02-18T16:01:53+01:00</updated>
    <author>
        <name type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[Marco von Ballmoos]]>
  </name>
      <uri>https://earthli.com/users/marco</uri>
    </author>
      <summary type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<blockquote class="quote abstract "><div>Disclaimer: these are notes I took while reading this book. They include citations I found interesting or enlightening or particularly well-written. In some cases, I&rsquo;ve pointed out which of these applies to which citation; in others, I have not. Any benefit you gain from reading these notes is... [<a class="complete-text-link" href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3507">More</a>]</div></blockquote>]]>
  </summary>
      <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<html lang="en">
  <head>
    <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/themes/ice.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/fonts/raleway.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/core/medium.css">
  </head>
  <body>
<div class="style-controls">  <div class="page">
    <div class="page-body">
<div class="info-box-top">
<p>
Published by <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_user.php?name=marco" title="Marco von Ballmoos" class="visible">marco</a> on <span class="date-time">18. Feb 2018 16:01:53 (GMT-5)</span>
</p>
</div>
      <div class="text-flow wide">
  <blockquote class="quote abstract "><div>Disclaimer: these are notes I took while reading this book. They include citations I found interesting or enlightening or particularly well-written. In some cases, I&rsquo;ve pointed out which of these applies to which citation; in others, I have not. Any benefit you gain from reading these notes is purely incidental to the purpose they serve of reminding me what I once read. Please see Wikipedia for a summary if I&rsquo;ve failed to provide one sufficient for your purposes. If my notes serve to trigger an interest in this book, then I&rsquo;m happy for you.</div></blockquote><p>This is the third book of the Broken Earth series. The underground city of Castrima is no longer habitable after the epic battle at the end of the Obelisk Gate. Alabaster is gone, having been turned into a stone eater. Essun&rsquo;s arm below the elbow is also stone, leading her on the same path as Alabaster. This means that she can no longer perform orogeny without sacrificing parts of her body to stone. She can choose, though, so after the first time, where she loses a hand and part of an arm, she funnels the damage to a breast instead. But it&rsquo;s not really stone, is it? It&rsquo;s solidified magic and she is growing ever more adept at manipulating the magic that underlies orogeny, that is it&rsquo;s founding principle.</p>
<p>Jemisin weaves the massive myth ever larger, telling us of the deep history of mankind. How mankind built the obelisks to harness magic power, how humanity enslaved a race that was the master of deep magic, but not the master of technology. She tells of how this race was wiped out, but rebuilt in the form of several adepts who would become the original stone eaters (including Hoa). The ossification process Essun is undergoing—and which Alabaster completed—is the stone-eater&rsquo;s form of reproduction, of getting new members of their ancient race.</p>
<p>The story tells of how mankind bored down to the core—through the core—to tap what it thought would be an unlimited supply of magic, how humanity sought to harness this power with the original stone-eaters from a moon base and using the massive obelisks to focus their power. She tells of how Father Earth exists—and that he&rsquo;s pissed. He struck back, taking over some of the obelisks, thwarting the process, making humanity blow the moon out of orbit and starting the first of the Seasons that would plague the planet for dozens of Millennia.</p>
<p>The story of the Guardians is also fleshed-out: they are agents of Father Earth, imbued with magical power through a bit of the Earth&rsquo;s core lodged in their sessapinae (in their brains). The technology and the world and the history and myth is a wonderfully imagined and woven tale, bringing together many elements of magic and science and also strongly reflecting our own history, predilections and prejudices.</p>
<p>The plot follows Nassun as she ends up in a colony in Antarctica with her father Jija—and under the tutelage of Schaffa, her mother&rsquo;s former Guardian. Schaffa has changed, though, and is no longer fully under the control of Father Earth. He wants to help Nassun achieve her goal of <em>burning everything to the ground</em>—destroying the Earth and humanity that would produce such a blighted landscape and unending torture for her and her people (orogenes).</p>
<p>For this, she ventures to Corepoint, but first travels to an ancient city from which the attack on Father Earth was originally launched. Here, we learn more about its history, before she and Schaffa take an ancient monorail through the heart of the planet to Corepoint.</p>
<p>At the same time, Essun and the rest of Castrima adventure their way to Rennanis, the city that they defeated at the end of the second book. They establish themselves in this old and enormous city, but Essun knows she must move on. She must accompany Hoa, her stone-eater, to try to right what humanity broke many, many years ago. All of her friends come with her, traveling in a group through the center of the Earth, slipped through the strata by Hoa. They are attacked by other stone eaters along the way and there is attrition. </p>
<p>Essun seeks to recapture the Moon and put it back in orbit, to make peace with Father Earth and put an end to the seasons. She must fight Nassun on this—who wants to use the Obelisk Gate to plow the Moon into the Earth and kill everyone.</p>
<p>Having seen how the stone eaters live, Nassun changes her plan (she&rsquo;s only 10 or 11) and decides to use the power of the Obelisk Gate to change all of humanity into stone eaters instead. Essun battles against her, but eventually gives up, expending her last power to let her daughter have her own way and turning to stone. Nassun takes pity and fulfills her mother&rsquo;s plan instead, using the power of the Obelisk Gate to align the Moon back into its former orbit. Father Earth is pleased and agrees to a truce with mankind.</p>
<p>In the epilogue, Essun awakes as a stone eater and starts to pick up the pieces of an Earth that knows peace with Father Earth, that once again has a moon, with hopefully much-humbled humans and no more Seasons.</p>
<h2>Citations</h2><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;When a slave rebels, it is nothing much to the people who read about it later. Just thin words on thinner paper worn finer by the friction of history. (“So you were slaves, so what?” they whisper. Like it’s nothing.)&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 141-143</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;When a comm builds atop a fault line, do you blame its walls when they inevitably crush the people inside? No; you blame whoever was stupid enough to think they could defy the laws of nature forever. Well, some worlds are built on a fault line of pain, held up by nightmares. Don’t lament when those worlds fall. Rage that they were built doomed in the first place.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 146-148</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;For a very long time I could not tell the difference between one of their kind and another. They all look different, but they have the same non-presence within the ambient. I still have to remind myself that hair textures and eye shapes and unique body odors each have as much meaning to them as the perturbations of tectonic plates have to me.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 584-586</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Perhaps this is because we have earthtalk?&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 1291-1291</div></div><p>Earthtalk seems to be a lot like the Adem sign language from the Kingkiller chronicles. It functions differently but serves the same purpose.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;They’re afraid because we exist, she says. There’s nothing we did to provoke their fear, other than exist. There’s nothing we can do to earn their approval, except stop existing—so we can either die like they want, or laugh at their cowardice and go on with our lives.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 1395-1397</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;It doesn’t matter what we do. The problem is them.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 1408-1409</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Even the idea of Yumenes is hard for Nassun to comprehend: millions of people, none of them farmers or miners or anything that fits within the range of her experience, many of them obsessed with strange fads and politics and alignments far more complex than those of caste or race.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 1685-1687</div></div><p>That is what mystifies me about our world: so many people with no worthwhile capabilities feel entitled to so much. The most naturally useless are somehow the wealthiest.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Would’ve been nice if we could’ve all had normal, of course, but not enough people wanted to share. So now we all burn.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 2143-2144</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;[…] the people of the world would not survive without it. Orogenes are essential. And yet because you are essential, you cannot be permitted to have a choice in the matter. You must be tools—and tools cannot be people. Guardians keep the tool … and to the degree possible, while still retaining the tool’s usefulness, kill the person.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 2240-2242</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;It is the way of the world, but it isn’t. The things that happen to orogenes don’t just happen. They’ve been made to happen, by the Guardians, after years and years of work on their part. Maybe they whispered ideas into the ears of every warlord or Leader, in the time before Sanze. Maybe they were even there during the Shattering—inserting themselves into ragged, frightened pockets of survivors to tell them who to blame for their misery, and how to find them, and what to do with the culprits found.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 2243-2247</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;<strong>But there are none so frightened, or so strange in their fear, as conquerors. They conjure phantoms endlessly, terrified that their victims will someday do back what was done to them</strong>—even if, in truth, their victims couldn’t care less about such pettiness and have moved on. Conquerors live in dread of the day when they are shown to be, not superior, but simply lucky. (Emphasis added.)&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 2641-2643</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;“The Leadership families of Yumenes believed that orogenes once ruled the world,” he says. “That their duty was to keep your kind from ever regaining that much power. That you would be monstrous rulers of the world, doing back to ordinary folk what had been done to you, if you ever got the chance. I don’t think they were right about any of it—and yet.” He gestures, as she stands there illuminated by the fire of the earth. “Look at you, little one. If you are the monster they imagined you to be … you are also glorious.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 3022-3026</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Magic, Steel called the silver. The stuff underneath orogeny, which is made by things that live or once lived. This silver deep within Father Earth wends between the mountainous fragments of his substance in exactly the same way that they twine among the cells of a living, breathing thing. And that is because a planet is a living, breathing thing; she knows this now with the certainty of instinct. All the stories about Father Earth being alive are real.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 3050-3053</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;There’s some solidity to it; as they draw closer, Nassun can detect anomalies dotting the surface of the bright sphere, made tiny by contrast—even as she realizes they are obelisks. Several dozen of them, jammed into the heart of the world like needles in a pincushion. But these are nothing. Nothing.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 3072-3074</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;When the Earth speaks, it does not do so in words, exactly. This is a thing you know already, but that Nassun only learns in this moment. She sesses the meanings, hears the vibrations with the bones of her ears, shudders them out through her skin, feels them pull tears from her eyes. It is like drowning in energy and sensation and emotion. It hurts. Remember: The Earth wants to kill her. But remember, too: Nassun wants it just as dead. So it says, in microshakes that will eventually stir a tsunami somewhere in the southern hemisphere, Hello, little enemy. (This is an approximation, you realize. This is all her young mind can bear.)&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 3085-3090</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The silver—magic—comes from life. Those who made the obelisks sought to harness magic, and they succeeded; oh, how they succeeded. They used it to build wonders beyond imagining. But then they wanted more magic than just what their own lives, or the accumulated aeons of life and death on the Earth’s surface, could provide. And when they saw how much magic brimmed just beneath that surface, ripe for the taking … It may never have occurred to them that so much magic, so much life, might be an indicator of … awareness. The Earth does not speak in words, after all—and perhaps, Nassun realizes, having seen entirely too much of the world to still have much of a child’s innocence, perhaps these builders of the great obelisk network were not used to respecting lives different from their own. Not so very different, really, from the people who run the Fulcrums, or raiders, or her father. So where they should have seen a living being, they saw only another thing to exploit. Where they should have asked, or left alone, they raped.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 3111-3119</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;This is only fair, it reasons—coldly, with an anger that still shudders up from the depths to crack the world’s skin and touch off Season after Season. It is only right. The Earth did not start this cycle of hostilities, it did not steal the Moon, it did not burrow into anyone else’s skin and snatch bits of its still-living flesh to keep as trophies and tools, it did not plot to enslave humans in an unending nightmare. It did not start this war, but it will rusting well have. Its. Due.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 3122-3125</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Once, after all, I believed I was the finest tool ever created by a great civilization. Now, I have learned that I am a mistake cobbled together by paranoid thieves who were terrified of their own mediocrity. I don’t know how to feel, except reckless.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 3209-3211</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;He doesn’t want you to hear him say “like one of you,” Remwha signals, humming with irritation at my obtuseness. And he doesn’t want you to know what it means, if he says it. He reassures himself that he is not like the people who made his own life harder. It’s a lie, but he needs it, and he needs us to support that lie. She should not have told us that we were Niess. We aren’t Niess, I gravitic-pulse back. Mostly I’m annoyed that he had to point this out. Gallat’s behavior is obvious, now that Remwha has explained. To them we are.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 3229-3233</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Later, when we process all this, I will tell the others, She wants to be a person. She wants the impossible, Dushwha will say. Gallat thinks it better to own her himself, rather than allow Syl Anagist to do the same. But for her to be a person, she must stop being … ownable. By anyone. Then Syl Anagist must stop being Syl Anagist, Gaewha will add sadly. Yes.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 3239-3242</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Nonliving, inorganic things like crystal are inert to magic. Therefore, in order to help the fragments initiate the generative cycle, raw magic must be used as a catalyst. Every engine needs a starter. Enter the sinklines: They look like vines, thick and gnarled, twisting and curling to form a lifelike thicket around the fragment’s base. And ensnared in these vines— We’re going to see them, Kelenli told me, when I asked her where the Niess were.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 3292-3296</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;You cannot go to people like that and ask them to fund a research project that makes heroes of roggas! You just can’t. They’ll faint, and when they wake up, they’ll have you killed. They’ll destroy you as surely as they would any threat to their livelihoods and legacy. Yes, I know that’s not what you think you’re doing, but it is.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 3592-3595</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Corepoint sits at the peak of an enormous underwater shield volcano, and the first few miles of the hole drilled at its center are actually lined with a hollowed-out complex of living quarters, laboratories, and manufactories. These underground facilities, originally meant to house Corepoint’s geomagests and genegineers, have long since been turned to a wholly different purpose—because this flip side of Corepoint is Warrant, where Guardians are made and dwell between Seasons.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 3625-3629</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Threads of silver roam over her body, determining her discomfort by touching her nerves and then repairing her bruises and scrapes; other threads whip the particles of the bed until friction warms them; yet more threads search her skin for infinitesimal dry flakes and flecks of dust, and scrub them away.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 3690-3692</div></div><p>Magic as nanotech? Nanotech as magic?</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;No wonder the people who built the obelisks needed so much silver, if they used it in lieu of wearing blankets, or taking baths, or letting themselves heal over time.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 3694-3696</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;What follows won’t be good, but it’ll be bad for everyone—rich and poor, Equatorials and commless, Sanzeds and Arctics, now they’ll all know. Every season is the Season for us. The apocalypse that never ends. They could’ve chosen a different kind of equality. We could’ve all been safe and comfortable together, surviving together, but they didn’t want that. Now nobody gets to be safe. Maybe that’s what it will take for them to finally realize things have to change.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 3772-3776 (from Alabaster&#039;s journal)</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Some accept their fate. Swallow their pride, forget the real truth, embrace the falsehood for all they’re worth—because, they decide, they cannot be worth much. If a whole society has dedicated itself to their subjugation, after all, then surely they deserve it? Even if they don’t, fighting back is too painful, too impossible. At least this way there is peace, of a sort. Fleetingly. The alternative is to demand the impossible. It isn’t right, they whisper, weep, shout; what has been done to them is not right. They are not inferior. They do not deserve it. And so it is the society that must change. There can be peace this way, too, but not before conflict.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 3920-3925</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;No one really wants to face the fact that the world is the way it is because some arrogant, self-absorbed people tried to put a leash on the rusting planet. And no one was ready to accept that the solution to the whole mess was simply to let orogenes live and thrive and do what they were born to do.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 3933-3935</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;That he was the scion of a people abused; that those people’s forebears were, too, in their turn; that the world as he knew it could not function without forcing someone into servitude. At the time he could see no end to the cycle, no way to demand the impossible of society&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 3936-3938</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;I see the elegant vinework on the surrounding buildings and I know that somewhere, a biomagest is tabulating how many lammotyrs of magic can be harvested from such beauty. Life is sacred in Syl Anagist—sacred, and lucrative, and useful.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 3951-3953</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Because this is what the Sylanagistines truly made us for: to affirm a philosophy. Life is sacred in Syl Anagist—as it should be, for the city burns life as the fuel for its glory. The Niess were not the first people chewed up in its maw, just the latest and cruelest extermination of many. But for a society built on exploitation, there is no greater threat than having no one left to oppress. And now, if nothing else is done, Syl Anagist must again find a way to fission its people into subgroupings and create reasons for conflict among them. There’s not enough magic to be had just from plants and genegineered fauna; someone must suffer, if the rest are to enjoy luxury.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 4193-4198</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;[…] this reasoning is still flawed, because Syl Anagist is ultimately unsustainable. It is parasitic; its hunger for magic grows with every drop it devours. The Earth’s core is not limitless. Eventually, if it takes fifty thousand years, that resource will be exhausted, too. Then everything dies. What we are doing is pointless and Geoarcanity is a lie. And if we help Syl Anagist further down this path, we will have said, What was done to us was right and natural and unavoidable.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 4199-4202</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Remember, too, that the Earth does not fully understand us. It looks upon human beings and sees short-lived, fragile creatures, puzzlingly detached in substance and awareness from the planet on which their lives depend, who do not understand the harm they tried to do—perhaps because they are so short-lived and fragile and detached.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 4285-4287</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;As big as the world is, Nassun is beginning to realize it’s also really small. The same stories, cycling around and around. The same endings, again and again. The same mistakes eternally repeated.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 4331-4333</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Yet for all its grandeur, despite the evidence it offers of feats of geneering long lost to humankind, Nassun cannot bring herself to be impressed by it. The hole feeds no one, provides no shelter against ash or assault.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 4424-4426</div></div><p>I like that the planet is alive, an implacable life-form bent on shaking these meddlesome ticks from its skin. It wants neither peace nor symbiosis. It wants them gone. They dared to try to enslave it. No soft Gaia, this.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;It knows she means to bring the Moon down, and that this will create a cataclysm far worse than the Shattering. It wants to live.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 4641-4642</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;I don’t bother to explain that just because something is horrible does not make it any less true.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 4960-4961</div></div>      </div>
      </div>
        <div class="footer">
    <div class="footer-data"><div class="footer-links"><ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/contact.php" title="">Contact</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/support.php" title="">Support</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/privacy.php" title="">Privacy</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/rights.php" title="">Rights</a></li></ul></div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="copyright">Copyright (c) 1999-2026 earthli.com. All Rights Reserved.</div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="versions">Powered by <ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore/app_news.php">earthli News 3.7</a></li><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore" title="">earthli WebCore&trade; 3.7</a></li></ul></div></div>    </div>
      </div>
  </div>  </body>
</html>
]]>
  </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
      <title type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[The Obelisk Gate by N.K. Jemisin (2016) (read in 2017)]]>
  </title>
    <id>https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3474</id>
    <link href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3474"/>
    <updated>2018-02-18T15:51:05+01:00</updated>
    <author>
        <name type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[Marco von Ballmoos]]>
  </name>
      <uri>https://earthli.com/users/marco</uri>
    </author>
      <summary type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<blockquote class="quote abstract "><div>Disclaimer: these are notes I took while reading this book. They include citations I found interesting or enlightening or particularly well-written. In some cases, I&rsquo;ve pointed out which of these applies to which citation; in others, I have not. Any benefit you gain from reading these notes is... [<a class="complete-text-link" href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3474">More</a>]</div></blockquote>]]>
  </summary>
      <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<html lang="en">
  <head>
    <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/themes/ice.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/fonts/raleway.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/core/medium.css">
  </head>
  <body>
<div class="style-controls">  <div class="page">
    <div class="page-body">
<div class="info-box-top">
<p>
Published by <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_user.php?name=marco" title="Marco von Ballmoos" class="visible">marco</a> on <span class="date-time">18. Feb 2018 15:51:05 (GMT-5)</span>
</p>
<p>
Updated by <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_user.php?name=marco" title="Marco von Ballmoos" class="visible">marco</a> on <span class="date-time">18. Feb 2018 15:55:14 (GMT-5)</span>
</p>
</div>
      <div class="text-flow wide">
  <blockquote class="quote abstract "><div>Disclaimer: these are notes I took while reading this book. They include citations I found interesting or enlightening or particularly well-written. In some cases, I&rsquo;ve pointed out which of these applies to which citation; in others, I have not. Any benefit you gain from reading these notes is purely incidental to the purpose they serve of reminding me what I once read. Please see Wikipedia for a summary if I&rsquo;ve failed to provide one sufficient for your purposes. If my notes serve to trigger an interest in this book, then I&rsquo;m happy for you.</div></blockquote><p>This is the second book of the Broken Earth series. We follow Essun on her journey south, away from the massive Rift at the equator—the one that Alabaster ripped in order to break the stranglehold on humanity of the Fulcrum and the equatorial cities. Essun still seeks Nassun, her daughter, who is even further south. She joins up with Hoa, a strange child and Tonkee, a filthy but intelligent comm-less woman. They end up in Castrima, an underground chamber of crystals that are run by ancient technology to provide water and energy for its denizens. There is a sort of safety there, with an uneasy peace between humans and orogenes.</p>
<p>We learn that Tonkee is actually a Leader who Essun met many years ago, when she was in-training at the Fulcrum. We also learn that Hoa is actually stone eater—and that there are other stone eaters in Castrima. They have their own agenda. There are others that helping a city to attack Castrima (Rennanis). The crystal cave is indefensible. Even Alabaster—who has also returned, with his own stone-eater Antimony in tow—cannot help, as he is turning to stone himself (every time he practices orogeny—or magic, as he teaches Essun). He teaches Essun much more of humanity&rsquo;s deep history and much more about how to control orogeny on a deeper level—on the level of magic (the silver).</p>
<p>Meanwhile Nassun is learning all of this on her own, without anyone&rsquo;s help, mastering magic in a way the Essun likely never will. Still, Essun uses the Obelisk Gate to fight off Renannis&rsquo;s attack—and to strike at the heart of the city to destroy them once and for all. She also uses the tremendous power to hunt and trap (but not kill—even she can&rsquo;t do that) stone eaters in the crystals of Castrima. She is the second person to control the gate in millenia, after Alabaster, who used the Gate to create the Rift that started the latest Season.</p>
<p>The book ends with Alabaster having died (or been transformed), Castrima on the move and Nassun in Antarctica. We have learned much  more about the myths underlying this world and this version of humanity&rsquo;s history—but it&rsquo;s nothing compared to what comes in the third book.</p>
<h2>Citations</h2><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;There is something underneath the heat of the volcano, interspersed amid the wavelets of motion that dance through the earth. It’s easy to manipulate the waves and heat, but hard to even perceive this other thing, which is perhaps why Mama taught Nassun to look for waves and heat instead. But if Nassun can grasp the other thing, which is finer and more delicate and also more precise than the heat and waves… if she can shape it into a kind of sharp edge, and file it down to infinite fineness, and slice it across the shaft like so— There is a quick, high-pitched hiss as the air between her and Jija stirs. Then the chain tip of the harpoon shaft drops loose, the shorn faces of metal glimmering mirror-smooth in the afternoon light.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 1446-1451</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Who knows when some version of our ancestors first crawled out of the ash and started jabbering at each other? Thirty thousand years? Forty? A long time to be the pathetic creatures we are now, huddling behind our walls and putting all our wits, all our learning, toward the singular task of staying alive. That’s all we make now: Better ways to do field surgery with improvised equipment. Better chemicals, so we can grow more beans with little light. Once, we were so much more.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 1957-1961</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;I don’t think it’s what they’re made of that makes stone eaters so different. I think it’s that no one can live that long and not become something entirely alien.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 2017-2018</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;You’d almost forgotten this part of him: the dreamer, the rebel, always reconsidering the way things have always been because maybe they should never have been that way in the first place. He’s right, too. Life in the Stillness discourages reconsideration, reorientation. Wisdom is set in stone, after all;&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 2452-2454</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The Guardians who work with the Fulcrum are one of the factions I told you about, so to speak. They’re the ones who want the status quo: roggas made safe and useful, stills doing all the work and thinking they run the place, Guardians actually in charge of everything. Controlling the people who can control natural disasters.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 2471-2474</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;But then you haven’t spent much time thinking about Guardians, when you weren’t in the immediate vicinity of one. Maybe this is another kind of thought aversion you’ve been conditioned to: Don’t look up, and don’t think about those damned smiles. You decide to make yourself think about them now. “But Guardians die during a Season…” Shit. “They say they die…” Shit. “Of course they don’t.” Alabaster lets out a rusty sound that might be a laugh. “I’m a bad influence.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 2474-2478</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;She seizes you. If you hadn’t been used to this from Alabaster, you would have panicked, but it’s the same as what happened back then: Ykka’s orogeny sort of melds with and consumes yours. You relax and let her take control, because instantly you realize you are stronger than her and could, should, take control yourself—but you are the learner here, and she is the teacher. So you hold back, to learn. It is a dance, of sorts.</p>
<p>&ldquo;Her orogeny is like… a river with eddies, curling and flowing in patterns and at a pace. Yours is faster, deeper, more straightforward, more forceful, but she modulates you so efficiently that the two flows come together. You flow slower and more loosely. She flows faster, using your depth to boost her force. For an instant you open your eyes, see her leaning against the crystal column and sliding down to crouch at its base so that she doesn’t have to pay attention to her body while she concentrates… and then you are within the geode’s crystal substrate, through its shell and burrowing into the rock that surrounds it, flowing around the warps and wends of ancient cold stone.</p>
<p>&ldquo;Flowing with Ykka, so easily that you are surprised. Alabaster was rougher than this, but maybe he wasn’t used to doing it when he first tried it with you. Ykka has done this with others, and she is as fine a teacher as any you have ever had. But— But. Oh! You see it so easily now. Magic. There are threads of it interwoven with Ykka’s flow. Supporting and catalyzing her drive where it is weaker than yours, soothing the layer of contact between you. Where’s all this coming from? She drags it out of the rock itself, which is another wonder, because you have not realized until now that there is any magic in the rock. But there it is, flitting between the infinitesimal particles of silicon and calcite as easily as it did between the particles of Alabaster’s stone substance.&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 4278-4291</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The boilbugs move. You perceive them as a wave of bright heat that surges out of underground nests and aboveground feeding piles that have formed around their many victims—hundreds of nests, millions of bugs, you had no idea the forest of Castrima was so riddled with them. Tonkee’s warning about the meat shortage is meaningless and too late; you could never have competed against such successful predators. You were always going to have to get used to the taste of human anyway.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 4351-4354</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Pissed off the wrong rogga, Hoa said of his own incarceration. Yes, these enemy stone eaters rusting did. You shout again but this time it is effort, it is aggression. SNAP and you break lattices and magic strands and reseal them to your own design. CRACK and you lift whole crystal shafts to throw them like spears and grind your enemies beneath. You look for Gray Man, the stone eater who hurt Hoa, but he is not among the mountains that threaten your home. These are just his minions. Fine. You’ll send him a message, then, written in their fear.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 4451-4455</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Some flee north. Unacceptable, and distance is nothing for you now. You pull up and wheel and pierce down again, and there is Rennanis, nestled within its lattice of nodes like a spider among its bundled, sucked-dry prey. The Gate is meant to do things on a planetary scale. It is nothing to you to drive power down and inflict upon every citizen of Rennanis the same thing you did to the woman who would’ve beaten Penty to death. Bullies are bullies. So simple to twist the flickering silver between their cells until those cells grow still, solid. Stone. It is done, and Castrima’s war won, in the span of a breath.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 4457-4462</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Suddenly it doesn’t matter. Nassun sighs and rubs her face with her hands, as weary as Father Earth must be after so many eternities of hate. Hate is tiring. Nihilism is easier, though she does not know the word and will not for a few years. It’s what she’s feeling, regardless: an overwhelming sense of the meaninglessness of it all.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 4590-4593</div></div>      </div>
      </div>
        <div class="footer">
    <div class="footer-data"><div class="footer-links"><ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/contact.php" title="">Contact</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/support.php" title="">Support</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/privacy.php" title="">Privacy</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/rights.php" title="">Rights</a></li></ul></div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="copyright">Copyright (c) 1999-2026 earthli.com. All Rights Reserved.</div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="versions">Powered by <ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore/app_news.php">earthli News 3.7</a></li><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore" title="">earthli WebCore&trade; 3.7</a></li></ul></div></div>    </div>
      </div>
  </div>  </body>
</html>
]]>
  </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
      <title type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[Books read in 2017]]>
  </title>
    <id>https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3357</id>
    <link href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3357"/>
    <updated>2018-01-15T23:20:44+01:00</updated>
    <author>
        <name type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[Marco von Ballmoos]]>
  </name>
      <uri>https://earthli.com/users/marco</uri>
    </author>
      <summary type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<dl><dt class="field">The Big Short: Inside the Doomsday Machine (2010)</dt>
<dd><div class=" "><p>by <em>Michael Lewis</em></p>
<p>This is the book on which the <em><a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3325">movie</a></em> was based. My review in that link was extensive and I liked the book just as much. Lewis really did a good job outlining the players, explaining the financial instruments and their holders,... [<a class="complete-text-link" href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3357">More</a>]</p>
</div></dd>
</dl>]]>
  </summary>
      <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<html lang="en">
  <head>
    <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/themes/ice.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/fonts/raleway.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/core/medium.css">
  </head>
  <body>
<div class="style-controls">  <div class="page">
    <div class="page-body">
<div class="info-box-top">
<p>
Published by <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_user.php?name=marco" title="Marco von Ballmoos" class="visible">marco</a> on <span class="date-time">15. Jan 2018 23:20:44 (GMT-5)</span>
</p>
<p>
Updated by <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_user.php?name=marco" title="Marco von Ballmoos" class="visible">marco</a> on <span class="date-time">18. Feb 2018 16:07:14 (GMT-5)</span>
</p>
</div>
      <div class="text-flow wide">
  <dl><dt class="field">The Big Short: Inside the Doomsday Machine (2010)</dt>
<dd><div class=" "><p>by <em>Michael Lewis</em></p>
<p>This is the book on which the <em><a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3325">movie</a></em> was based. My review in that link was extensive and I liked the book just as much. Lewis really did a good job outlining the players, explaining the financial instruments and their holders, inventors, connections, weaknesses and ramifications.</p>
<p>It&rsquo;s an extremely financially technical book and will prove a challenge for many to figure out what&rsquo;s really going on. Lewis emphasizes several times that most people in the industry didn&rsquo;t know how these things worked, but knew for approximately how long they would work, so they made money and unloaded them on unsuspecting saps before everything blew up. Others knew that the government would bail them out and just drove their companies into a wall, coming out smelling like roses anyway.</p>
<p>Lewis does a good job of highlighting both the criminality and the stupidity of so many in the industry—and also the hopelessness of any change coming out of the worldwide debacle.</p>
<p>I&rsquo;ve included <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3369">notes, citations and errata</a> in a separate post.</p>
</div></dd>
<dt class="field">The Swift Programming Language (Swift 3.0.1) (2016)</dt>
<dd><div class=" "><p>by <em>Apple</em></p>
<p>This is an incredibly detailed language specification for Swift and programming guide for iOS and OS X. The language itself is quite complex and includes so many programming features that it&rsquo;s nearly dizzying. There are a lot of examples, as well as English-language translations of all of the examples. This leads to a lot of text, but you can get into the rhythm of skipping the few paragraphs after the examples to move on to the next concepts (especially if the code sample was abundantly clear).</p>
<p>The kitchen sink includes:</p>
<ul>
<li>Functional switch statements (matching)</li>
<li>Inferred types</li>
<li>Argument labels</li>
<li>Very wordy Error-handling
<li><div>An unbelievable number of keywords:<ul>
<li><code>autoclosure</code>: required when the developer wants to avoid closing over certain variables and creating cycles (which the reference-counter in Swift cannot break on its own)</li>
<li><code>convenience</code>: identifies initialization methods that are not required</li>
<li><code>convention</code>: indicates the calling convention to use: <code>swift</code>, <code>block</code> or <code>c</code></li>
<li><code>defer</code>: Swift&rsquo;s version of <code>finally</code></li>
<li><code>deprecated</code>: An attribute to indicate when a feature was deprecated (see <code>obsoleted</code>)</li>
<li><code>discardableResult</code>: functions are pure and results must be used; add this attribute to allow a result to be ignored</li>
<li><code>dynamic</code>: trigger the compiler to use Objective-C–style method-dispatch</li>
<li><code>escaping</code>: indicate that a lambda parameter is used outside of the called function</li>
<li><code>extension</code>: add features to a type</li>
<li><code>infix</code>: operator type</li>
<li><code>introduced</code>: An attribute to indicate when a feature was introduced</li>
<li><code>lazy</code>: explicitly indicate that a property initialization should be delayed until it is first called</li>
<li><code>obsoleted</code>: An attribute to indicate when a feature was made obsolete (see <code>deprecated</code>)</li>
<li><code>optional</code>: a feature of a protocol that does not have to be implemented in the implementing type (it can be satisfied by an <code>extension</code> instead)</li>
<li><code>postfix</code>: operator type</li>
<li><code>prefix</code>: operator type</li>
<li><code>required</code>: identifies initialization methods that are not convenience</li>
<li><code>subscript</code>: an indexer function (e.g. <code>[<em>x</em>]</code>)</li>
<li><code>testable</code>: an attribute that subverts the type/member/function visibility so that a test framework has access to internals</li>
<li><code>unowned</code>: use a weak reference that allows the owner to cascade-delete the object that has the unowned reference to it</li>
<li><code>weak</code>: a classic weak reference: the reference will be set to <code>nil</code> when the referenced object is deleted.</li>
<li>two types of generic constraints</li>
<li>and so on…</li></ul></div></ul><p>I&rsquo;ve included <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id= 3366">notes, citations and errata</a> in a separate post.</p>
</div></dd>
<dt class="field">Notes from Underground (1850)</dt>
<dd><div class=" "><p>by <em>Fyodor Dostoyevsky</em></p>
<p>This is a short book, split into two main parts. The first part is a cry of anger at society, spit out at the world from &ldquo;underground&rdquo; by the narrator. It is delivered in a nearly stream-of-consciousness form and opines on all sorts of social and philosophical issues—often winding back on itself to second-guess or to revise. The attached notes give abundant examples.</p>
<p>The second part is told by the same author, but in a more refined tone. It seems to describe an incident of mortifying self-awareness and banal evil that seems to have been the trigger for the previous narrator&rsquo;s (same person, but 20 years later) having turned his back on society. The young man was exceedingly poor and exceedingly proud and took out his frustrations on an even poorer and more unfortunate young woman, destroying her feelings. All the while, he was completely aware of what it cost her and what it would cost him, but his brutal honesty in his internal—and, often, external—dialogue, didn&rsquo;t allow him to stop himself.</p>
<p>I&rsquo;ve included <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3371">notes, citations and errata</a> in a separate post.</p>
</div></dd>
<dt class="field">Rigged: How Globalization and the Rules of the Modern Economy Were Structured to Make the Rich Richer (2016)</dt>
<dd><div class=" "><p>by <em>Dean Baker</em></p>
<p>Dean Baker puts together a comprehensive program to address massive inequality in America. The same inexorable and relatively straightforward logic could easily apply to other countries as well. The only problem with Baker&rsquo;s suggestions is that they utterly fail to benefit the masters of the universe. Still, his proposals for addressing the real issues facing the American economy are breathtakingly easily explained. He lays out his plan without regard for political interest or ideology. He explains how an economy does not exist in some sort of natural state—that it is the creation of explicit policy. This is perhaps his most important point. Anyone who claims that the system that they prefer, which just happens to benefit them immensely, is also the morally pure one because it is &ldquo;natural&rdquo;—is full of shit.</p>
<p>Baker explains in detail which parts of the economy are actually productive and which are just collecting rent. There are vast parts of the economy that could be trimmed, with quite significant effects for the majority. For example, the financial industry, including what used to be traditional banking, is almost purely rent-seeking, providing no substantial or commensurate value. Another area is healthcare, where the U.S. pays twice as much per person as any other first-world nation. Or professions, like dentistry, medicine or law, where salaries are twice as high as in other nations (at least). Out-of-control CEO pay and the twisted incentives and controls of the boards of large corporations is another area where a rational cleanup would yield giant gains. Then there are copyrights and patents, which are government-granted monopolies—again, not a natural outgrowth of a so-called free-market system.</p>
<p>All told, Baker&rsquo;s book illustrates in no uncertain terms the astounding degree—it&rsquo;s nearly total—with which the benefits of increased productivity and income have been collected and funneled to a handful of rich people. All the while, they pay everyone in the intelligentsia and media to convince the sheep that this is just a natural result of them being so much better. It&rsquo;s all bullshit.</p>
<p>Economies are human constructions and the one we currently enjoy has been constructed by the winners to benefit those winners. The first step is to open your eyes. Baker&rsquo;s book will help immensely. Highly recommended.</p>
<p>I&rsquo;ve included <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3393">notes, citations and errata</a> in a separate post.</p>
</div></dd>
<dt class="field">A Man Called Ove (2012) (en/2014)</dt>
<dd><div class=" "><p>by <em>Fredrik Backman</em></p>
<p>This is the story of Ove, a man living in a town on the outskirts of a city in Sweden. Ove likes things predictable and can&rsquo;t see why anyone would want it any other way. Other people are distractions and annoyances and constantly disappointing. The story is told in the third person, but from the viewpoint of a 59-year–old Ove. Some of the chapters are flashbacks to help readers understand <em>why</em> Ove is the way he is, how it&rsquo;s possible for him to be at once cantankerous beyond all imagining and also a generous person.</p>
<p>His life arc starts with a mother who dies too soon and being raised until 16 by a father he honors and worships, until his father, too, is taken away by the grim reaper. Ove takes over his father&rsquo;s job and his lifestyle, simple and direct, working hard and sticking to rigid principle. Most appreciate him for his work and attitude and forthrightness but there are opponents, one of whom, Tom, eventually leads him to lose his job. He learns construction during the day while cleaning trains at night. He meets Sonja, from then on his only reason for waking and drawing breath. She is likewise—and for all of her friends, mysteriously—enchanted. Though he doesn&rsquo;t say much, he listens well—and he is bulky with workman&rsquo;s muscle to compensate for his taciturnity.</p>
<p>They make a life together, moving in to the district where Ove lives in the present, with life dealing them one raw deal after another. They go to Spain on holiday, where a pregnant Sonja takes siestas with gusto while Ove wanders the countryside, making himself useful with his skills despite an almost complete language barrier. On the way home, the bus crashes, taking their unborn child as well as Sonja&rsquo;s ability to walk. Nevertheless, they weather these tragedies well enough, settling into a happy and comfortable routine. The world begins to outpace Ove, with his dedication to fine craftsmanship in homes and cars seeing less and less value in the real world, a world filled with distracted idiots, flitting between ephemeral obsessions. This includes his new neighbors with whom he has entirely too much to do—the Pregnant Foreign Woman and the Lanky Fool with their two children. Throw into the mix a Bent and unwanted Housemate, a Mailman who doesn&rsquo;t understand propriety or boundaries and a cat who seems to embody Sonja&rsquo;s now-passed–on conscience.</p>
<p>Ove wants nothing more than to join Sonja wherever she&rsquo;s ended up after succumbing to cancer but his neighbors manage to distract him from several attempts at ending it all, always in the nick of time. Ove grudgingly finds himself useful again, even loved. He teaches Parvaneh to drive, he helps Anders fix a bike and buy a car, he teaches a bigoted father to stop being a jackass and to be happy he has a son at all. He continues to be the man that Sonja always knew him to be. Until, eventually, and after a few years of a second life, he finally joins her.</p>
<p>I&rsquo;ve included <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3399">notes, citations and errata</a> in a separate post.</p>
</div></dd>
<dt class="field">The Road to Wigan Pier (1937)</dt>
<dd><div class=" "><p>by <em>George Orwell</em></p>
<p>This book is nearly divided into two parts.</p>
<p>The first details Orwell&rsquo;s travel to the northern part of England to live amongst miners in their communities. These are not nice communities. There is nothing green about them. They live cheek by jowl in atrocious sanitary conditions, surviving on scraps of food and barely making meager rents on their meager salaries. The work is nearly incomprehensibly back-breaking. Shifts are long. Life is without purpose other than to greet another day of misery.</p>
<p>Orwell swings in tone from somewhat judgmental (of the bad seeds) to exceedingly praising (of the stalwart workers). He compares moral/ethical life in the north favorably to what is to be found in the south, where the posh Englanders reside. Many of his observations of the working class as well as the intransigencies of capitalism are just as true today as they were then.</p>
<p>For example,</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;In a way it is even humiliating to watch coal-miners working. It raises in you a momentary doubt about your own status as an “intellectual” and a superior person generally. For it is brought home to you, at least while you are watching, that it is only because miners sweat their guts out that superior persons can remain superior.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;This business of petty inconvenience and indignity, of being kept waiting about, of having to do everything at other people’s convenience, is inherent in working-class life. A thousand influences constantly press a working man down into a passive rôle.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;It is only when you lodge in streets where nobody has a job, where getting a job seems about as probable as owning an aeroplane and much less probable than winning fifty pounds in the Football Pool, that you begin to grasp the changes that are being worked in our civilisation.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Life is still fairly normal, more normal than one really has the right to expect. Families are impoverished, but the family-system has not broken up. The people are in effect living a reduced version of their former lives. Instead of raging against their destiny they have made things tolerable by lowering their standards.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Twenty million people are underfed but literally everyone in England has access to a radio. What we have lost in food we have gained in electricity. Whole sections of the working class who have been plundered of all they really need are being compensated, in part, by cheap luxuries which mitigate the surface of life.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;And the peculiar evil is this, that the less money you have, the less inclined you feel to spend it on wholesome food. A millionaire may enjoy breakfasting off orange juice and Ryvita biscuits; an unemployed man doesn’t.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Every middle-class person has a dormant class-prejudice which needs only a small thing to arouse it; and if he is over forty he probably has a firm conviction that his own class has been sacrificed to the class below.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>Sound or feel familiar? These things seem to be constants in our society, by now. These are the hard nubs of capitalism that remain when surface affectation has worn away.</p>
<p>The second half of the book is a treatise on the state of Socialism in his day. He is very supportive of socialism but quite critical of its practitioners. He exhorts them to be more practical and to come up with realistic recruitment plans that don&rsquo;t involve insulting everyone who doesn&rsquo;t immediately agree with them. There is a lot of material here that is 100% applicable to leftist (and, perhaps still, especially socialist) movements today, in the first quarter of the 21st century, nearly 100 years after Orwell wrote his remarks. He offers some solid and practical advice:</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;To oppose Socialism now, when twenty million Englishmen are underfed and Fascism has conquered half Europe, is suicidal. It is like starting a civil war when the Goths are crossing the frontier.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;To recoil from Socialism because so many individual Socialists are inferior people is as absurd as refusing to travel by train because you dislike the ticket-collector’s face.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The Socialist movement has not time to be a league of dialectical materialists; it has got to be a league of the oppressed against the oppressors.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;But if you are constantly bullying me about my “bourgeois ideology,” if you give me to understand that in some subtle way I am an inferior person because I have never worked with my hands, you will only succeed in antagonising me. For you are telling me either that I am inherently useless or that I ought to alter myself in some way that is beyond my power.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;These are the sinking middle class, and most of them are clinging to their gentility under the impression that it keeps them afloat. It is not good policy to start by telling them to throw away the life-belt.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>A full listing of citations is below. The first half of the book may be more amenable to most, but both halves are well-worth reading. Highly recommended.</p>
<p>I&rsquo;ve included <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3407">notes, citations and errata</a> in a separate post.</p>
</div></dd>
<dt class="field">Divided: The Perils of Our Growing Inequality (2014)</dt>
<dd><div class=" "><p>by <em>David Cay Johnston</em></p>
<p>This book is a collection of essays and studies on many different facets and types of inequality: Income. Education, Health-Care, Debt and Poverty, Policy and Family. The title and sub-headings listed prior say it all, actually: this book is about the root of America’s problem—Inequality. And not just income inequality, but wealth, opportunity, all of which add up to a purportedly democratic system that looks exactly like feudalism. You can read the essays in any order, but I read the book front to back. The book was published in 2014 and only one essay/study includes data from as recently as 2013. The others stretch back over decades, pinpointing the point when the U.S. left its path to turn the screws on its own populace. These essays show not only the problems we face, they show how we got here and what we need to do to get out of it. Spoiler alert: I bet we don’t take any of their advice. Recommended.</p>
<p>I&rsquo;ve included <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3416">notes, citations and errata</a> in a separate post.</p>
</div></dd>
<dt class="field">The New Jim Crow (2012)</dt>
<dd><div class=" "><p>by <em>Michelle Alexander</em></p>
<p>This is an impeccably researched, devastatingly factual, relentlessly focused and canonical volume on ongoing institutional racism against blacks in the United States. The argument is that the power over blacks that whites had through slavery was not eradicated with the end of slavery, but rather made to go (very temporarily) underground only to reappear as Jim Crow laws—laws that subjugated blacks just as effectively as slavery without the stigma of human chattel.</p>
<p>She continues the argument that the 20th-century (and now, 21st-century) United States prison system almost totally subverts civil-rights achievements by continuing the subjugation of blacks, sending them once again to a second-class society in America, just as effectively as slavery and the Jim Crow laws did.</p>
<p>The U.S. slavery laws designated black people as property. This kept them in an official lower caste. Once owning people was no longer socially acceptable, the caste system was continued by denying all sorts of rights with poll tests and other extremely precisely defined qualification systems, collectively known as Jim Crow laws. Once the Jim Crow laws were deemed illegal—and, more importantly, no longer socially acceptable—the elites pivoted once again and came up with a new way of relegating blacks to a second-class caste: criminalization.</p>
<p>Fueled by a tremendous propaganda effort—as well as very willing participants—one law after another was created, targeting blacks specifically in order to mark them as voluntary criminals and therefore unworthy of participation in mainstream society. The U.S. Drug War was instrumental in this mission. The many ways in which the criminalization of blacks was achieved are breathtakingly insidious and devious. The most devious part is that the latest incarnation disarmed the civil-rights movement&rsquo;s best weapon: the morally offensive racial bias of Jim Crow laws tended to pull people together to support their discriminated brethren. By swapping race for criminality, they drive a wedge between potential non-criminal supporters and those who have supposedly chosen a life of crime.</p>
<p>Alexander presents her thesis relentlessly, heaping an irrefutable amount of information on the reader until the propaganda wall of all but the most hardened racists must be broken down. That might be giving people too much credit, though.</p>
<p>I&rsquo;ve included <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id= 3429">notes, citations and errata</a> in a separate post.</p>
</div></dd>
<dt class="field">Based on a True Story: Not a Memoir (2016)</dt>
<dd><div class=" "><p>by <em>Norm McDonald</em></p>
<p>Norm&rsquo;s purported autobiography is at-once multi-layered and tightly written. In few words, he paints a plethora of possibilities. The style is reminiscent of Twain, Vonnegut, Kafka and Burroughs. His stories—as was the case with these auspicious predecessors—are often seemingly inspired by hallucinogenic substances as well as completely fictitious—often bald-facedly so—and not at all autobiographical.</p>
<p>He is deeply funny. He is easily insightful. His writing is a pleasure to read. Some passages rear out of the work, standing alone as jewels of prosaic creation. He tells of his days and nights on the road, of his heroin and alcohol addiction, of his at-once madcap and lethargic friend, of his gambling addictions. He tells of growing up on an farm in Canada with the mysterious Old Jack, of his obsession with Sarah Silverman, his verbal sparring with Lorne Michaels, his simultaneous lack of and spectacular surfeit of success at comedy, his killer jokes that at-once cannot fail and always backfire.</p>
<p>His denouement or resurrection comes in the form of a ghost writer who emulates his employer to such a degree that the narrative line blurs and shifts and whipsaws, with Matryoshka-like nesting of ideas, plot-lines and authorial voices. Norm escapes to fight another day. Highly recommended.</p>
<p>I&rsquo;ve included <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id= 3430">notes, citations and errata</a> in a separate post.</p>
</div></dd>
<dt class="field">The Devils of Loudon (1952)</dt>
<dd><div class=" "><p>by <em>Aldous Huxley</em></p>
<p>In this book, Huxley tackles the historical subject of the possession by the devil of the Urseline nuns in Loudun in the 17th century. The affair was a scientific and judicial disaster, by today&rsquo;s standards. And our standards aren&rsquo;t even very high, to be honest. The story centers on the prosecution of Father Urban Grandier, a priest in early 17th-century France in the Diocese of Lourdes. He is eminently fallible, especially as far as his vow of celibacy goes. He is not a very nice man, loving and leaving and focusing fairly narrowly on Father Urban Grandier rather than the concerns of his flock. He gives interesting and rousing services, but that&rsquo;s about where his dedication to the flock ends. He is far more interested in personal power, in climbing the Church ladder and in boinking pretty young things.</p>
<p>Naturally, there are other forces at work, not including local and powerful merchants as well as other members of the Church in places as far-flung from Lourdes as Paris. Even Richelieu and Louis XIII are involved, at least by name.</p>
<p>Grandier&rsquo;s single-mindedness eventually backfires as he collects far too many enemies—all of whom are bereft of any scruples or devotion to a sound justice system. When the prioress of a local convent goes off her gourd, her obsession with Grandier is the key to his undoing. His enemies harness her insanity, use several torturers/exorcisers to rouse similar libidinous and salacious feelings in the other nuns and then begin a campaign to blame the whole sordid situation on Urban&rsquo;s consorting with the Devil and then corrupting and/or possessing and/or fucking the nuns (naturally, in absentia and through the demons he controls). The exorcism circus continues for <em>months</em>, if not years, establishing itself as very lucrative—if exhausting—for the nuns, who are forced to put on sometimes-daily shows</p>
<p>It&rsquo;s all utter hogwash, as most participants—the accusers, Grandier and the nuns—know. Some believe in the possessions, but they are willing participants like the exorcist, who delights in sexually torturing the nuns with enemas and other implements, all in the name of God.</p>
<p>The book sounds more exciting than it actually is. There are long, historical sections as well as treatises on the mind of the average citizen of France (or the world, for that matter) at the time. These discussions of the state of psychology, science and sociology at the time are fascinating, if a bit long-winded. As well, the notion of demonic possession is placed into historical and scientific perspective. Huxley&rsquo;s fascination and experience with psychedelics and altered mental states serves him well here, I think.</p>
<p>Huxley is extremely well- and widely read, freely mixing passages in the original, archaic French and Latin. The material is thoroughly footnoted and draws on both original source material as well as other studies of on this supposed possession done throughout the intervening centuries. His approach differs in that he examines the whole sordid tale through the lens of the 16th-century Frenchman&rsquo;s context, complete with the social and scientific mores of the day that an average citizen had at his or her disposal. He dismisses the reality of the possession and tries to understand what lessons we can learn about human nature, religion and our capability of understanding the universe to any reliable degree whatsoever.</p>
<p>Again, this may still sound more interesting than it actually is. The prose is dense as well as a bit dated. I liked the overall story arc and was brought to the book by Ken Russell&rsquo;s 1970 film, <em>The Devils</em>, which was fantastic.</p>
<p>I&rsquo;ve included <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3441">notes, citations and errata</a> in a separate post.</p>
</div></dd>
<dt class="field">The Doors of Perception / Heaven and Hell (1954/1956)</dt>
<dd><div class=" "><p>by <em>Aldous Huxley</em></p>
<p>This is a book in two parts. The first is called <em>The Doors of Perception</em> and is an analysis of one of Huxley&rsquo;s mescaline trips. It interweaves nigh-painfully evocative descriptions of what he saw on his 8-hour trip with a history of visions and visionaries. The discussion includes an examination of social implications of various intoxicants and their relative efficacy in providing escape, insight and advancement.</p>
<p>The second book <em>Heaven and Hell</em> is a discussion of the thesis that much religious symbology is anchored in an effort to replicate/evoke/commemorate/trigger the majestic preternatural visions experienced on mescaline, peyote or sensory or nourishment deprivation. He discusses the relative facility of some artwork to transport individuals to other, more-visionary inner places. The efficacy of art to transport is relative to the age within which it was observed: modern society&rsquo;s surfeit of color and distraction serves to dampen the power of artwork that would otherwise be more easily able to induce visions and insight.</p>
<p>While he does not offer a scientific or empirical base for his thoughts, his rumination on their ineffability—and his attempts to make it more effable with some sort of framework, a model—is very interesting. He seeks not to diminish religion but neither does he lend credence to any of their models as the one true way. The subconscious is to be mined for insight—and insight exists outside of provability. His model is of the <em>antipodes</em> of the mind, places separate from the conscious and even most of the subconscious mind, where a clearer, unfiltered lens on reality exists. Or, at least, seems to exist. At that level of abstraction, it doesn&rsquo;t matter whether it&rsquo;s &ldquo;real&rdquo; in a physical or measurable sense, but that it influences your everyday consciousness and makes you a more observant, peaceful and reasonable person.</p>
<p>These books, like <em>The Devils of Loudon</em>, are an investigation by a prodigiously learned, patient, curious, intelligent and open mind into difficult but overwhelmingly interesting topics for which there are no single answers, no roadmaps to enlightenment. The book includes voluminous appendices that comprise more than 1/3 of its pages. It&rsquo;s not a self-help book. It&rsquo;s not a scientific treatise. It&rsquo;s a notebook of observations written by a master. Recommended.</p>
<p>I&rsquo;ve included <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3440">notes, citations and errata</a> in a separate post.</p>
</div></dd>
<dt class="field">Die Kraft der Kälte (2015 − 2017/de)</dt>
<dd><div class=" "><p>by <em>Wim Hof and Koen de Jong</em></p>
<p>I&rsquo;d heard about Wim Hof before and was quite intrigued with his accomplishments, many of which are detailed in this book. The book is a series of stories about Wim Hof and how he came up with his regimen for resisting cold and disease.</p>
<p>He is called the Ice Man because he can control his body temperature and metabolism directly rather than autonomically. His technique works not only for him, but also for others. The book details how he&rsquo;s been in sports laboratories to measure his metabolism, energy throughput, body temperature, pulse, blood pressure and so on. He&rsquo;s been in an ice bath for almost two hours without his body temperature dropping from 37ºC.</p>
<p>He&rsquo;s run a marathon in Finland, above the Arctic Circle. It took him over five hours, but he made it and he didn&rsquo;t freeze. It was -16ºC. He ran in just jogging shorts and running sneakers. He did the same thing up to Base Camp 2 on Everest. On Kilimanjaro, he hiked up in 48 hours instead of the recommended 6 days, again in just shorts and no shirt. That time, he was accompanied by 24 people who&rsquo;d trained in his technique. None of them were mountain climbers, some were afflicted with various diseases. All but one made it all the way up to 5500m and back down without assistance. None of them wore shirts or long pants.</p>
<p>He&rsquo;s undergone experiments where he was injected with a light virus, that he then actively rejected. Soon after, a dozen of his students did the same thing, showing that the technique isn&rsquo;t just limited to a one-time physiognomy.</p>
<p>The technique is pretty simple, outlined below (in German, because I read the book in German).</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;Tief in den Bauch einatmen, dann ausatmen.<br>
Tief in den Bauch einatmen, dann ausatmen.<br>
Tief in den Bauch einatmen, dann ausatmen.</p>
<p>&ldquo;Atmen sie in dem Tempo und Rhythmus, der Ihnen am angenehmsten ist.</p>
<p>&ldquo;30-mal wiederholen.</p>
<p>&ldquo;Beim letzten Mal komplett ausatmen, dann erneut sehr tief einatmen, wieder langsam ausatmen und warten.&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;Duschen sie wie gewohnt warm. Dann, immer noch mit warmem Wasser,<br>
 beginnen Sie mit den Atemübungen. Atmen Sie langsam ein und aus. Machen Sie dies ein paarmal und drehen Sie die Dusche dann auf kalt. Versuchen Sie,<br>
 ruhig weiterzuatmen. Stehen Sie eine Minute unter der kalten Dusche. In der zweiten Woche stehen Sie erst unter der warmen, dann zwei Minuten unter der kalten Dusche. In der dritten Woche stehen Sie erst unter der Warmen, dann drei Minuten unter der kalten Dusche. Under in der vierten Woche stehen Sie fünf Minuten unter der kalten Dusche, ohne vorher warm geduscht zu haben.</p>
<p>&ldquo;Gut ist es auch, wenn Ihre Hände und Füsse einmal pro Woche ein Eisbad nehmen. Füllen Sie eine Schüssel mit kaltem Wasser und fügen Sie Eiswürfel hinzu. […] Halten Sie die Hände zwei Minuten lang in das Eiswasser, anschliessend die Füsse.&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote><p>That&rsquo;s pretty much it.</p>
</div></dd>
<dt class="field">October: The Story of the Russian Revolution (2017)</dt>
<dd><div class=" "><p>by <em>China Miéville</em></p>
<p>This is a thoroughly researched retelling of the Russian revolution, as written by a master of Science Fiction and Fantasy. It takes the reader from February 1917 to October/November 2017. There follows a bit of an epilogue, sketching the following decades roughly, but that&rsquo;s not the focus of the book.</p>
<p>The focus is on how the initial coup of Nicholas II transformed over nearly a year to the Bolshevik revolution. The summer sees a cavalcade of famous names, each placed in history: Lenin, Trotsky, Maslov, Kolchak, Semenov, Stalin, Sukhanov … the list goes on an on.</p>
<p>Allegiances whipsaw, bolsheviks gain in power over the summer, the second revolution in October was a near-inevitability in hindsight. A very interesting and very well-written unsnarling of an incredibly complicated and singularly important sequence of events. The hopefulness and solidarity of the socialists shines through at nearly every moment. They would, in the end, win for a only a few shining months before the clouds of totalitarianism descended. Highly recommended.</p>
<p>I&rsquo;ve included <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3439">notes, citations and errata</a> in a separate post.</p>
</div></dd>
<dt class="field">The Island of the Day Before (1994/en–1995)</dt>
<dd><div class=" "><p>by <em>Umberto Eco</em></p>
<p>This is the story of Roberto de la Griva, an Italian stranded on an island somewhere in the Pacific Ocean. We hear of how he was at the wars between the Spanish, French and Italians over northern Italy. We hear of how he lost his father. We learn of his education in the salons of Paris. We hear how he is railroaded into a journey to the other side of the world by French intriguers high up in government bent on learning the secrets of the Meridians before the Dutch.</p>
<p>We learn of various mechanisms by which one might determine the Meridian. Many are absolutely hare-brained and doubtless thoroughly researched by the author.</p>
<p>When Roberto ends up stranded on the island, he has arrived there after his first ship—<em>The Amaryllis</em>—has shipwrecked. On that boat, he&rsquo;d befriended an Englishman (Byrd) who&rsquo;d seemingly discovered a way of determining the meridian by using &ldquo;empathy at a distance&rdquo;, a ludicrous scientific theory whereby the blade that caused a wound can be used to influence the wound afterwards. Apply salve to the blade and the wounded is instantaneously soothed; apply fire and the wounded writhes in further pain. Since the action is instantaneous and occurs at a distance with no known physical mechanism, the clever Englishman wounds a dog in England, takes it with him on his journey, and then keeps the wound open for the entire journey to the Antipodes. The blade is subjected to actions at agreed-upon times, so that Byrd knows the time accurately enough in England to calculate his longitudinal position.</p>
<p>This is obvious balderdash and good riddance to the lot of them. Roberto sees that Byrd is most likely seeing what he wants to see and likely has no more real idea where he is than countless sailors before him.</p>
<p>When the ship wrecks, Roberto escapes with his life, bumping up against the <em>Daphne</em>, a pristine and (nearly) abandoned ship moored about a mile off of the eponymous island. Roberto investigates the boat, only to find unexpected scientific treasures that indicate that the <em>Daphne</em> was perhaps on the same mission as the <em>Amaryllis</em>. He suspects an &ldquo;Intruder&rdquo; on his boat and eventually meets Father Caspar (or does he?): a Jesuit, with whom he discusses various scientific topics like the position and motion of astral bodies, the composition of matter and so on. Many of these concepts are discarded theories from past centuries, lovingly brought back to life by Eco, the master of such arcana. In a way, the theories of today sound just as hare-brained, leading one to wonder with what laughter they will be greeted by subsequent generations.</p>
<p>The good father can make not only a water-pumped musical organ but can also teach Roberto to swim and has also invented an underwater diving apparatus. It is a veritable tour-de-force of 16th-century science. He drowns in it, trying to get to the Island of the Day Before?</p>
<p>Why is it called that? Because the good father believes he has navigated to the antemeridian, the Antipodes, so that the island lies constantly in yesterday relative to the <em>Daphne</em>&rsquo;s today.</p>
<p>Was he correct? It is hard to know. He was trying to reach the island to get to the Speculum Melitensis, a device he&rsquo;d constructed on the island that somehow encompasses every amazing bit of scientific knowledge and insight wrapped in one giant, delicate object. It was set up by Caspar and the sailors but has now likely dropped into disrepair. Subsequent chapters throw doubt on the reality of Father Caspar entirely.</p>
<p>Roberto also spends an interminable time wondering about the fire dove that Caspar described seeing on the island, but he fails to descry it even once. This does not stop Eco—in the form of the modern-day editor of Roberto&rsquo;s tale—from going on at tedious length about everything he knows about doves and their significance in legend.</p>
<p>The book picks up significantly in the final third, as Roberto spins onion-shells of stories around his lady love, Lydia, whom he forces into a tryst with his nonexistent brother Ferrante (resurrected from his psyche) so that Roberto&rsquo;s own love can be best expressed in a white-hot jealousy that he himself controls. Ferrante&rsquo;s track through Europe and purported/fictitious crossing with Roberto—and all of the people Roberto met in Paris, like Richelieu and Mazarin—is a rollicking tale, well-told.</p>
<p>He ends up a pirate, heading for the exact island off of which the <em>Daphne</em> is anchored, on a ship crewed by micreants, with Lydia hidden on-board as an androgyne sailor and his nemesis lashed to a cross in the hold, serving in the role of the wounded dog in Ferrante&rsquo;s ship&rsquo;s longitudinal instrument. They visit island after island, one more bizarre than the next (similar to Gulliver in Swift&rsquo;s tale, with Roberto serving in the role of the narrator from <em>Cloud Atlas</em>). None of this actually happens, other than in Roberto&rsquo;s fevered mind, desperately trying to build a life with his love from hallucinatory fragments.</p>
<p>As usual with Eco, it&rsquo;s nearly impossible to tell which way is up, which tale is true, whether Roberto is even on the boat or trapped on the island in the form of Ferrante, imagining himself elsewhere, or vice versa. The master at work.</p>
<p>I&rsquo;ve included <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3442">notes, citations and errata</a> in a separate post.</p>
</div></dd>
<dt class="field">The Making of Donald Trump (2016)</dt>
<dd><div class=" "><p>by <em>David Cay Johnston</em></p>
<p>Johnston writes a book that outlines several of Trump&rsquo;s failed real-estate–development plans. But he, at the same time, documents how people were trying to sue Trump because they invested in him because of his good name only to find out that Trump is only tangentially involved with their real-estate investment. Are these people just stupid to think that Trump would be good for their property? Reading this book, there would be no other conclusion, since you don&rsquo;t hear about a single successful thing that Trump has done. He seems to somehow own property all over the world, but none of it belongs to him and he&rsquo;s only ever ripped off, failed or otherwise disappointed every investor who&rsquo;s ever associated with him.</p>
<p>However, people still think his name is worth investing in, Companies pay him millions to use his name on their projects, even if he&rsquo;s not involved. There must be a reason for this, but Johnston&rsquo;s book does not provide it. Either everyone is an <em>utter and irredeemable moron</em> or Trump must have some successes to his name. There must be some—even a majority of—investors who&rsquo;ve walked away satisfied, probably even coming back for more.</p>
<p>Many of the investors in his get-rich-quick schemes kind of seem like people who are getting what&rsquo;s coming to them. They want to get rich, so they sink all of their money into a single opportunity with Trump. The man must have something going for him, or these people wouldn&rsquo;t do that. Trump inflates his own story and ego all the time, nearly constantly turning the conversation to himself (as Johnston documents). He is a germophobe with poor social skills (as Johnston also documents). And yet, people invest their entire fortune with him. </p>
<p>Johnston is clearly only telling part of the story. He&rsquo;s telling the part of the story where we shouldn&rsquo;t vote for this man as President, where we shouldn&rsquo;t do deals with him, shouldn&rsquo;t invest money with him or go anywhere near him, where we shouldn&rsquo;t ever pay attention to him again. Agreed. I&rsquo;d been doing that already, before I read this biography.</p>
<p>However, the story Johnston tells is of sealed court decisions, suspicious and quite facially reprehensible behavior, but never a conviction. Trump&rsquo;s had his casino license for decades but Johnston seems to attribute it to luck. Trump&rsquo;s run multiple casinos for decades (even having the most successful casino in Atlantic City, according to Johnston) but he doesn&rsquo;t know anything about the business and everyone makes fun of how stupid he is.</p>
<p>Trump is a bad businessman and a more terrible person, but everyone seems to be on Trump&rsquo;s side, helping him out. Why? The story Johnston tells is of a person who is horrible, stupid and financially inept, who hangs out with obvious criminals, but who succeeds despite all of that. He can&rsquo;t seem to fail enough to stop being a billionaire.</p>
<p>It&rsquo;s hard to feel sorry for some of his &ldquo;investors&rdquo;. Whenever a story ends with someone having signed without reading because of time pressure…I kind of get distracted. I know that old people get entrapped in stuff like this.</p>
<p>In those cases, the charge is always of some information that Trump and his associates or partners failed to disclose properly. I&rsquo;m almost sure it was disclosed somewhere—it was just that people didn&rsquo;t read it in their eagerness to cash in. Otherwise, why would the court not nail Trump to the wall if it was so open-and-shut?</p>
<p>But why no prosecution? Is it because Trump—the bumbling, asocial fool—is so slick? Or because America&rsquo;s system is so morally bankrupt? In a place like America, don&rsquo;t sign anything without reading it. It&rsquo;s your own fault if you&rsquo;re trying to get rich quick.</p>
<p>The fact that these cases ended in a settlement with no criminal charges or sentence suggests to me that there&rsquo;s more to the story again. It&rsquo;s possible that such malfeasance is nearly impossible to prove in America, or that Trump really knows everyone and buys off judges and DAs—but that&rsquo;s a much bigger charge. Instead, we&rsquo;re expected to believe that he just gets away with it because &ldquo;reasons&rdquo;. No charges or sentence—but we know he did it.</p>
<p>Trump gets away with everything short of murder, associating with terrible people and having a very suspicious business. But he&rsquo;s still going. He&rsquo;s still in business. He&rsquo;s now President of the USA. The story Johnston tells goes nowhere in explaining how this could be. He just deepens the mystery.</p>
<p>Trump says many things that are not true. Are they lies we should care about? Or did he change his mind? Or does he just not care what the answer is to a question he feels he shouldn&rsquo;t have to answer from someone who he feels doesn&rsquo;t have the right to ask it? Trump is an egomaniac, of course. He&rsquo;s a liar, of course. But, as a private citizen, he has no obligation to answer a journalist&rsquo;s question truthfully, especially when it concerns his near-future whereabouts or his personal affairs.</p>
<p>It is here that, again, I feel Johnston is really reaching for straws, trying to paint every nugget of data he has on Trump as not only negative (and that it most certainly is and probably fairly) but <em>damning</em>. I think it unfortunately weakens his case because he&rsquo;s taken the shotgun approach, with topics of wildly varying import. The ones that sound important peter out into no prosecution (and hence possibly speculation) and the ones that don&rsquo;t sound important then just seem petty and cheap.</p>
<p>He expects us to conclude that where there&rsquo;s smoke, there&rsquo;s fire, despite <em>decades</em> of smoke without ever having proof of fire. His evidence is persuasive, but I&rsquo;m not a judge or a lawyer. I&rsquo;m not in charge of prosecuting Trump: dozens of judges have had that pleasure. None of them have put him away. He&rsquo;s still going. </p>
<p>A true believer would round up each allegation to a conviction, but thats not how our system works.</p>
<p>Johnston seems to vaguely imply some sort of angel on Trump&rsquo;s shoulder, but it&rsquo;s more of a condemnation of the American system as a whole that Johnston isn&rsquo;t willing to come right out and make. The system is corrupt from top to bottom and a creature like Trump is perfectly suited to swim in those fetid waters. Johnston seems to be desperately trying to show how obvious it is that Trump shouldn&rsquo;t be a winner in a sane society. He makes a good case. The fact that Trump is winning more than ever suggest a whole other book that needs to be written—this one about America.</p>
<p>I&rsquo;ve included <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3450">notes, citations and errata</a> in a separate post.</p>
</div></dd>
<dt class="field">In Cold Blood (1966)</dt>
<dd><div class=" "><p>by <em>Truman Capote</em></p>
<p>This is the story of a brutal multiple-murder in Kansas in the late 1950s. Truman Capote puts together an exquisitely researched and well-told tale. It is a masterful exemplar of historical fiction, in that the facts are clearly represented, but they are decorated with fictive imagining of conversations that add a lot of flavor without distracting from the story or making it feel fake. In particular, a lot of the book involves the interaction between the two perpetrators before, during and after the murders—something that Capote could only have gleaned from interviews and notes, but that he writes <em>as if he&rsquo;d been there</em>. Expertly and nigh-poetically written. Highly recommended.</p>
<p>I&rsquo;ve included <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3452">notes, citations and errata</a> in a separate post.</p>
</div></dd>
<dt class="field">Planet Hulk (2006)</dt>
<dd><div class=" "><p>by <em>Marvel</em></p>
<p>This is a comic-book series that follows the banishment of the Hulk from planet Earth by Reed Richards, Tony Stark, Dr. Strange and Black Bolt. The Hulk is enraged (obviously) and, instead of landing on the intended peaceful planet, where he would have been safe from harming anyone, he lands on a gladiator planet. Naturally, he excels there and ends up conquering the planet, solving all of their societal problems and ending up as a benevolent and much-loved dictator.</p>
<p>At the very end, his rage is pushed to galactic levels by a final explosion from his ship that obliterates much of his capital city, killing his wife and unborn child and paving the way for <em>World War Hulk</em>. Some of the book were beautifully drawn—the stories were less inspiring. It&rsquo;s difficult to write a book about a character who cannot be harmed, has ultimate power linked to rage and who has a healing factor. Everything feels like a deus ex machina and there&rsquo;s little tension. Still and all, a fun and distracting ride.</p>
</div></dd>
<dt class="field">World War Hulk (2007)</dt>
<dd><div class=" "><p>by <em>Marvel</em></p>
<p>This is the follow-up to <em>Planet Hulk</em>. I started reading this one first, but was so intrigued by all of the flashbacks that I stopped and read the original series first. It&rsquo;s not that you wouldn&rsquo;t be able to figure it out without it—the books not only repeated more than enough detail from <em>Planet Hulk</em> to let a reader know <em>exactly</em> what was going on, they also repeated the details of this current series again and again, each time from a different perspective—that of the main characters of the book in which that segment of the story appeared.</p>
<p>This is the story of the Hulk&rsquo;s enraged and revenge-seeking return to planet Earth, accompanied by his &ldquo;war-bound&rdquo;—friends that he won though common combat on the planet to which he&rsquo;d been inadvertently banished. Over the course of this series, the Hulk defeats absolutely every being sent against him, even heretofore unbeatable enemies like Black Bolt and the Sentinel. His powers are God-like and make storytelling somewhat difficult (again). There is at-times little tension, except when he is somehow and mysteriously weakened in order for him to be temporarily defeated by much-weaker opponents.</p>
<p>The storytelling is quite uneven and plagued by everybody being awesome and smartest in the universe and unfathomably powerful, etc. etc. Is it Sentinel? Galactus? The Hulk? Dr. Strange? I lost track of the ordering and just enjoyed the at-times spectacular artwork. Don&rsquo;t some for the story, come for the pictures.</p>
</div></dd>
<dt class="field">The Fifth Season (2015)</dt>
<dd><div class=" "><p>by <em>N.K. Jemisin</em></p>
<p>This is a very good book. It took me about a 100 pages to get into it, to get used to the storytelling rhythms of the author, to the at-times deliberate obfuscation and confusion. I feel that it took Jemisin that long to get into it as well, because the storytelling felt much more fluid in the later 70% of the book than in the first 30%. It is entirely possible that this is purely my fault, I&rsquo;ll admit. I&rsquo;m not getting any less-set in my ways. I just offer it as a warning to those who may be similarly put-off by the storytelling style—stick with it; it&rsquo;s worth it.</p>
<p>This is the story of an alternate Earth—one we learn follows our own auspicious, but ultimately doomed age—on which &ldquo;Father Earth&rdquo; plays a much-more active and vicious role, through extreme geologic events. Humans have split into distinct species, with distinct powers. The primary focus of this book is on the orogenes—humans who can draw power from any source, but primarily use the immense powers of the Earth itself. There is an arcane hierarchy amongst them. The least of them can manipulate the earth, but with no fine control. The most advanced of them can control molecules and draw immense power from disparate sources.</p>
<p>There is so much going on in this book: The Guardians, the Fulcrum, the Leadership class, the Orogenes, the Geomesters, the Stone-eaters, Alabaster&rsquo;s power and history and rebelliousness, Syenites power and connection to the floating obelisks, supposed relics of long-dead and failed human civilizations that followed the loss of Father Earth&rsquo;s &ldquo;child&rdquo;. These relics litter the planet in innumerable number, each serving as the tombstone of a civilization that failed to prepare properly for the often-long Fifth Seasons—sometime decades-long intermezzos initiated by cataclysmic geologic events.</p>
<p>The book is ostensibly about Syenite but is split between three tales, each of which tells of another facet of her life, though this doesn&rsquo;t become clear until late in the book (a feature that requires trust on the part of the reader—a trust Jemisin is ultimately a worthy of). It felt a bit derivative at first, but then I realized that it was following in the lines of other books and series that I&rsquo;ve really liked (e.g. Potter, Dune, Song of Ice and Fire) and that it was mixing these concepts in its own unique and well-written way. It&rsquo;s a rollicking tale—at times almost too quick-moving, cramming in so much at once, but somehow suitably controlled—and I&rsquo;m looking forward to book two.</p>
<p>I&rsquo;ve included <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3455">notes, citations and errata</a> in a separate post.</p>
</div></dd>
<dt class="field">The Name of the Wind (2007)</dt>
<dd><div class=" "><p>by <em>Patrick Rothfuss</em></p>
<p>This is book one of the Kingkiller Chronicles. It details the life of Kvothe, a preternaturally gifted young man. He is of the Edema Ruh, a family that is a traveling troupe of unparalleled talent. His parents are the leaders of this particular clan and teach him much of what they know. Along the way, they pick up an arcanist, Abernathy, who begins to teach the precocious young Kvothe much of what he would need to know to attend the University.</p>
<p>Tragedy strikes when the boy is just 12 years old. His father has written a song about ancient tales of ancient powers whose feats and powers—and evil—have largely been lost in the mists of time: the Chandrian. These creatures were wakened by the constant repetition of their names—names are powerful things—and they sought out and savagely killed the entire troupe. All, save Kvothe, who survives with only the clothes on his back.</p>
<p>He makes his way to a local city named Tarbean where he lives on the streets as a pitiful wretch, a beggar on the edge of existence. After several years, he finally manages to escape and makes his way to the University. There are adventures galore and Rothfuss tells the tale well. Kvothe gains entrance with his precocity, gains favor among some of the masters and makes lifelong enemies of others. His time spent studying with Abernathy serves him well. He ekes out a living playing the lute. Even at his young age, he&rsquo;s extremely talented from his genetics and his upbringing.</p>
<p>Near the end of his first year of school—after having more interesting and believable adventures, usually with his three bosom companions, Manet, Simmon and Wilem—he finally gets wind of a possible Chandrian sighting and heads off on a grand adventure. He ends up battling a dragon (of sorts), learns more of Denna, a fair maiden who he will continue to pursue (kind of) and returns with enough wealth to finance his next semester of school.</p>
<p>The story is told as a retrospective from Kvothe&rsquo;s (Kote&rsquo;s) inn, in a world  grown gray and evil, long after the tales he tells.</p>
<p>I&rsquo;ve included <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3462">notes, citations and errata</a> in a separate post.</p>
</div></dd>
<dt class="field">The Mammoth Book of the Best of Best New SF (2007)</dt>
<dd><div class=" "><p>by <em>Gardner Dozois</em></p>
<p>This is a gigantic collection of science-fiction short stories and novellas. From the title, it&rsquo;s the &ldquo;best of the best&rdquo;. That is, there is a &ldquo;best of&rdquo; collection edited every year by Gardner Dozois—and this is a &ldquo;best of&rdquo; just the stories already distilled from those works. There is a wide range of authors represented, though almost all of them have won one or many more of the most renowned and prestigious sci-fi and fantasy awards, like the Hugo and/or the Nebula. The stories are, for the most part, extremely good and well-worth reading. As someone who raised himself on a diet of golden-age and silver-age science fiction as well as a lot of 80s and 90s science fiction, it&rsquo;s really interesting to see where things have gone over the last 20 years during which I&rsquo;ve been paying far less-close attention (though I never went away entirely: I follow some authors, like Gibson and Stephenson and Egan and Baxter very closely).</p>
<p>I&rsquo;ve included <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3453">notes, citations and errata</a> in a separate post.</p>
</div></dd>
<dt class="field">Charlie One (2016)</dt>
<dd><div class=" "><p>by <em>Seán Hartnett</em></p>
<p>This is an autobiography by a man who grew up in the Republic of Ireland and joined the British Army in the early 2000s. At that time, the non-sectarian civil war had subsided to a great degree, but the British Army had a (supposedly) incredibly dense surveillance network in Norther Ireland, to keep an eye on the Republicans there. Seán rose quickly to become a quite adept signals technician and served at one of the most highly secretive and deep-undercover bases in Northern Ireland. They were allowed no contact with the outside world while on duty and had very little leave. The book details the major operations in which he was involved, focusing heavily on the technology of surveillance. It was more interesting than I expected it to be. The writing style is as you would expect from ex-military: Hartnett comes off extremely well in his re-tellings and there is lots of drinking.</p>
</div></dd>
<dt class="field">The Secret History of Twin Peaks (2016)</dt>
<dd><div class=" "><p>by <em>Mark Frost</em></p>
<p>The book starts a bit slowly, but quickly picks up pace as the early mythology of the TP universe starts to weave into parts we know from the TV show. The story is told from the point-of-view of an FBI agent pulling together all of the threads, assisted immensely by a research document put together by someone called <em>The Archivist</em>. The agent’s contributions are solely in footnotes. It is there that ze [1] pursues the identity of the Archivist.</p>
<p>The story weaves in every UFO and presidential and military conspiracy theory known in the States, with JFK and Nixon featuring prominently. The ur-myth of Twin Peaks is rooted in the terror that the world has at the discovery and use of nuclear weapons—and the accompanying caution with which this discovery is observed by other beings. I say &ldquo;other beings&rdquo; because it is clear that the term &ldquo;extra-terrestrial&rdquo; is explicitly <em>not</em> appropriate. While the term &ldquo;otherworldly&rdquo; might fit, it&rsquo;s clear that there is a strong likelihood that these beings have been on the planet longer than sentient mankind.</p>
<p>It’s an interesting story, nicely told. I read it after watching all three seasons and it was quite satisfying.</p>
<p>In the end, the author’s initials TP stand for Tamara Preston. The identity of the Archivist? Major Garland Briggs.</p>
<p>The format is not very E-book–friendly. It includes many newspaper clippings that can only be properly read—especially in dimmed light—by zooming in and panning. They do, however, lend a realistic, investigative feel to the material, though they slow down reading considerably.</p>
<p><hr></p>
<div class="footnote-reference"><span id="footnote_DRAFTABLE_ENTRY_3357_1_body" class="footnote-number">[1]</span> He or she.</div><p>I&rsquo;ve included <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id= 3490">notes, citations and errata</a> in a separate post.</p>
</div></dd>
<dt class="field">The Wise Man&rsquo;s Fear (2011)</dt>
<dd><div class=" "><p>by <em>Patrick Rothfuss</em></p>
<p>This is the second book in the Kingkiller Chronicles, the story of Kvothe.</p>
<p>This, too, is a story of a modern world that has forgotten its origins, its old power. Where each step along the path of knowledge is on a newly visible but well-worn path. A rediscovery of ancient truth, of deeper currents beneath the eddies of the superficial, modern, meaningless and ephemeral world. The deep origins of the world of the Fae, the shapers and their God, the original and most powerful one. As if all that ensued was a fading of the original nova, much as our universe is the mere echo of the big bang. That is, perhaps, the difference between science fiction and fantasy: one tells of expansion from strength to strength, a climb out of benighted ignorance, whereas the other tells of a relearning of ancient pinnacles, lost in the mists of time. The shape of its vast greatness can be vaguely discerned, but not in any way recaptured.</p>
<p>Mortals live in their world of material goods, squabbling over table scraps, while deeper currents of power course through an unseen world, intrinsically entwined with theirs, but separate and accessible only through twisted passages like the Adem’s Lenthian or the Arcanist’s Heart of Stone, Alar or the Names of things. The lines of force of the world are accessible to precious few and then only through nigh-inscrutable byways with little relation to rhyme or reason. Only instinct and a meditative letting-go of all that one knows is sometimes the only way to perceive it, to say nothing of harnessing it.</p>
<p>The more one sees of this deeper world, the more easily one dips into its powerful eddies and currents, the more unmoored one becomes from the mortal realm. That is the nature of the Sleeping Mind. This concept was also mentioned in the Star Wars canon: access to the Force is only possible through slippery, peripheral means, exercising muscles over which there is, at least at first, only autonomic control.</p>
<p>The deep history is unknown to the surface dwellers, the Amyr are a warrior sect mere centuries old to them, the powerful evil of the Chandrian hidden and woven into inconsequence behind tapestries of children’s stories.</p>
<p>The Chandrian are mixed up in this somehow, nearly invisible in the mortal realm and deeply feared in the world of the Fae.</p>
<p>This tale is paralleled on our world as the superficial world in which most people live versus the deeper world of science and logic, the knowledge of which transforms so much magic to mundanity.</p>
<p>We see in Star Wars as well, when Luke discards the light saber: he has realized that this is the crude toy of a child, that the Sleeping Mind is much more powerful without such crude tools. It explains Luke’s look of disappointment when Rey still didn’t understand that the light saber isn&rsquo;t anything compared to the true power of the force, of the Sleeping Mind.</p>
<p>In a sense, these are all religious stories. This is a particularly interesting and good one. Kvothe continues at University, but then takes time off to seek patronage from the richest man in the kingdom, the Mair. He serves him well and climbs the echelons of power there before being sent on an excursion to wipe out a nest of bandits in the Mair&rsquo;s lands.</p>
<p>This he does with a band of mercenaries, one of whom (Tempi) is Adem, a sort of Shaolin cult. They find the bandits, Kvothe uses his power to call the wind and his arcanist tricks to overwhelm them—and catches a glimpse of their leader, who is Cinder, of the Chandrian. They collect a tremendous amount of gold from the defeated bandits&rsquo; camp and head back. On the way, Kvothe is seduced by Felurian, a queen among the Fae, a mystical sidereal realm. We learn all about that realm, hear the Cthaeh&rsquo;s oracular predictions and then witness Kvothe&rsquo;s miraculous return to the mortal world. From here, he learns more of Tempi&rsquo;s martial art and then accompanies him back to his lands. Here he is trained in the art and passes an initiation rite, once again using the name of the wind. Instead of staying at the school, he leaves, defending the honor of the Edema Ruh as well as saving some damsels in distress along the way. He returns to the Mair, then to University. He doesn&rsquo;t have a patronage, but he does have guaranteed tuition as well as a salary from the Mair. He leverages these things to enrich himself and establish a solid life at the University. He now knows how to learn what Elodin is teaching (which is good, because that&rsquo;s the smartest man in the book). He finds Denna again and reconciles with her, after a fashion.</p>
<p>The book ends with Kvothe (Kote) once again the innkeeper, long after the time of the tales he tells. We all wait with bated breath for the final installment. Recommended.</p>
<p>I&rsquo;ve included <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id= 3492">notes, citations and errata</a> in a separate post.</p>
</div></dd>
<dt class="field">The Obelisk Gate (2016)</dt>
<dd><div class=" "><p>by <em>N. K. Jemisin</em></p>
<p>This is the second book of the Broken Earth series. We follow Essun on her journey south, away from the massive Rift at the equator—the one that Alabaster ripped in order to break the stranglehold on humanity of the Fulcrum and the equatorial cities. Essun still seeks Nassun, her daughter, who is even further south. She joins up with Hoa, a strange child and Tonkee, a filthy but intelligent comm-less woman. They end up in Castrima, an underground chamber of crystals that are run by ancient technology to provide water and energy for its denizens. There is a sort of safety there, with an uneasy peace between humans and orogenes.</p>
<p>We learn that Tonkee is actually a Leader who Essun met many years ago, when she was in-training at the Fulcrum. We also learn that Hoa is actually stone eater—and that there are other stone eaters in Castrima. They have their own agenda. There are others that helping a city to attack Castrima (Rennanis). The crystal cave is indefensible. Even Alabaster—who has also returned, with his own stone-eater Antimony in tow—cannot help, as he is turning to stone himself (every time he practices orogeny—or magic, as he teaches Essun). He teaches Essun much more of humanity&rsquo;s deep history and much more about how to control orogeny on a deeper level—on the level of magic (the silver).</p>
<p>Meanwhile Nassun is learning all of this on her own, without anyone&rsquo;s help, mastering magic in a way the Essun likely never will. Still, Essun uses the Obelisk Gate to fight off Renannis&rsquo;s attack—and to strike at the heart of the city to destroy them once and for all. She also uses the tremendous power to hunt and trap (but not kill—even she can&rsquo;t do that) stone eaters in the crystals of Castrima. She is the second person to control the gate in millenia, after Alabaster, who used the Gate to create the Rift that started the latest Season.</p>
<p>The book ends with Alabaster having died (or been transformed), Castrima on the move and Nassun in Antarctica. We have learned much  more about the myths underlying this world and this version of humanity&rsquo;s history—but it&rsquo;s nothing compared to what comes in the third book.</p>
<p>I&rsquo;ve included <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id= 3474">notes, citations and errata</a> in a separate post.</p>
</div></dd>
</dl>      </div>
      </div>
        <div class="footer">
    <div class="footer-data"><div class="footer-links"><ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/contact.php" title="">Contact</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/support.php" title="">Support</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/privacy.php" title="">Privacy</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/rights.php" title="">Rights</a></li></ul></div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="copyright">Copyright (c) 1999-2026 earthli.com. All Rights Reserved.</div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="versions">Powered by <ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore/app_news.php">earthli News 3.7</a></li><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore" title="">earthli WebCore&trade; 3.7</a></li></ul></div></div>    </div>
      </div>
  </div>  </body>
</html>
]]>
  </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
      <title type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[The Name of the Wind (The Kingkiller Chronicles Book 1) by Patrick Rothfuss (2007; read in 2017)]]>
  </title>
    <id>https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3462</id>
    <link href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3462"/>
    <updated>2018-01-15T23:16:11+01:00</updated>
    <author>
        <name type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[Marco von Ballmoos]]>
  </name>
      <uri>https://earthli.com/users/marco</uri>
    </author>
      <summary type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<blockquote class="quote abstract "><div>Disclaimer: these are notes I took while reading this book. They include citations I found interesting or enlightening or particularly well-written. In some cases, I&rsquo;ve pointed out which of these applies to which citation; in others, I have not. Any benefit you gain from reading these notes is... [<a class="complete-text-link" href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3462">More</a>]</div></blockquote>]]>
  </summary>
      <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<html lang="en">
  <head>
    <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/themes/ice.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/fonts/raleway.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/core/medium.css">
  </head>
  <body>
<div class="style-controls">  <div class="page">
    <div class="page-body">
<div class="info-box-top">
<p>
Published by <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_user.php?name=marco" title="Marco von Ballmoos" class="visible">marco</a> on <span class="date-time">15. Jan 2018 23:16:11 (GMT-5)</span>
</p>
<p>
Updated by <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_user.php?name=marco" title="Marco von Ballmoos" class="visible">marco</a> on <span class="date-time">27. Dec 2020 12:46:20 (GMT-5)</span>
</p>
</div>
      <div class="text-flow wide">
  <blockquote class="quote abstract "><div>Disclaimer: these are notes I took while reading this book. They include citations I found interesting or enlightening or particularly well-written. In some cases, I&rsquo;ve pointed out which of these applies to which citation; in others, I have not. Any benefit you gain from reading these notes is purely incidental to the purpose they serve of reminding me what I once read. Please see Wikipedia for a summary if I&rsquo;ve failed to provide one sufficient for your purposes. If my notes serve to trigger an interest in this book, then I&rsquo;m happy for you.</div></blockquote><p>This is book one of the Kingkiller Chronicles. It details the life of Kvothe, a preternaturally gifted young man. He is of the Edema Ruh, a family that is a traveling troupe of unparalleled talent. His parents are the leaders of this particular clan and teach him much of what they know. Along the way, they pick up an arcanist, Abernathy, who begins to teach the precocious young Kvothe much of what he would need to know to attend the University.</p>
<p>Tragedy strikes when the boy is just 12 years old. His father has written a song about ancient tales of ancient powers whose feats and powers—and evil—have largely been lost in the mists of time: the Chandrian. These creatures were wakened by the constant repetition of their names—names are powerful things—and they sought out and savagely killed the entire troupe. All, save Kvothe, who survives with only the clothes on his back.</p>
<p>He makes his way to a local city named Tarbean where he lives on the streets as a pitiful wretch, a beggar on the edge of existence. After several years, he finally manages to escape and makes his way to the University. There are adventures galore and Rothfuss tells the tale well. Kvothe gains entrance with his precocity, gains favor among some of the masters and makes lifelong enemies of others. His time spent studying with Abernathy serves him well. He ekes out a living playing the lute. Even at his young age, he&rsquo;s extremely talented from his genetics and his upbringing.</p>
<p>Near the end of his first year of school—after having more interesting and believable adventures, usually with his three bosom companions, Manet, Simmon and Wilem—he finally gets wind of a possible Chandrian sighting and heads off on a grand adventure. He ends up battling a dragon (of sorts), learns more of Denna, a fair maiden who he will continue to pursue (kind of) and returns with enough wealth to finance his next semester of school.</p>
<p>The story is told as a retrospective from Kvothe&rsquo;s (Kote&rsquo;s) inn, in a world  grown gray and evil, long after the tales he tells.</p>
<h2>Citations</h2><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;But I wouldn’t trust half these people to piss leeward without help.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 13</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Skarpi spoke to the man’s back. “It’s not as if I expect you to bound off looking for Haliax and the Seven yourself. ‘Small deeds for small men,’ I always say. I imagine the trouble is in finding the job small enough for men such as yourselves. But you are resourceful. You could pick trash, or check brothel beds for lice when you are visiting.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 191</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Then I felt something inside me break and music began to pour out into the quiet. My fingers danced; intricate and quick they spun something gossamer and tremulous into the circle of light our fire had made. The music moved like a spiderweb stirred by a gentle breath, it changed like a leaf twisting as it falls to the ground, and it felt like three years Waterside in Tarbean, with a hollowness inside you and hands that ached from the bitter cold.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 220</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;With another nod toward the seated students, I left the lecture hall without a backward glance.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 260</div></div><p>This is a bit too much, too much like the fantasies every young person has.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;“What do you know of poetry?” Ambrose said without bothering to turn around. “I know a limping verse when I hear it,” I said. “But this isn’t even limping. A limp has rhythm. This is more like someone falling down a set of stairs. Uneven stairs. With a midden at the bottom.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 284</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;“No offense, but would you mind checking again? I’m not sure I can trust the literacy of someone who tries to rhyme ‘north’ with ‘worth.’ No wonder you have to hold women down to get them to listen to it.” Ambrose stiffened and his arm slid off the back of the chair to fall at his side. His expression was pure venom. “When you’re older, E’lir, you’ll understand that what a man and a woman do together—” “What? In the privacy of the entrance hall of the Archives?” I gestured around us. “God’s body, this isn’t some brothel. And, in case you hadn’t noticed, she’s a student, not some brass nail you’ve paid to bang away at. If you’re going to force yourself on a woman, have the decency to do it in an alleyway. At least that way she’ll feel justified screaming about it.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 284</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;And there was Ambrose. To deem us simply enemies is to lose the true flavor of our relationship. It was more like the two of us entered into a business partnership in order to more efficiently pursue our mutual interest of hating each other.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 316</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;[…] sing opposite you? Is one of the boys you came in with a castrati?”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 360</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The man stepped into the light and the farmers’ excitement was smothered by the sight of the piecemeal leather armor and heavy sword that marked a mercenary. A lone mercenary was never reassuring, even in the best of times. Everyone knew that the difference between an unemployed mercenary and a highwayman was mostly one of timing.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 628</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;“The truth is deeper than that. It’s…” Bast floundered for a moment. “It’s like everyone tells a story about themselves inside their own head. Always. All the time. That story makes you what you are. We build ourselves out of that story.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 658</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Bast leaned closer until their faces were mere inches apart, his eyes gone white as opal, white as a full-bellied moon. “You are an educated man. You know there are no such things as demons.” Bast smiled a terrible smile. “There is only my kind.” Bast leaned closer still, Chronicler smelled flowers on his breath. “You are not wise enough to fear me as I should be feared. You do not know the first note of the music that moves me.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 661</div></div>      </div>
      </div>
        <div class="footer">
    <div class="footer-data"><div class="footer-links"><ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/contact.php" title="">Contact</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/support.php" title="">Support</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/privacy.php" title="">Privacy</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/rights.php" title="">Rights</a></li></ul></div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="copyright">Copyright (c) 1999-2026 earthli.com. All Rights Reserved.</div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="versions">Powered by <ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore/app_news.php">earthli News 3.7</a></li><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore" title="">earthli WebCore&trade; 3.7</a></li></ul></div></div>    </div>
      </div>
  </div>  </body>
</html>
]]>
  </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
      <title type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[The Secret History of Twin Peaks by Mark Frost (2016) (read in 2017)]]>
  </title>
    <id>https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3490</id>
    <link href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3490"/>
    <updated>2018-01-14T23:33:47+01:00</updated>
    <author>
        <name type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[Marco von Ballmoos]]>
  </name>
      <uri>https://earthli.com/users/marco</uri>
    </author>
      <summary type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<blockquote class="quote abstract "><div>Disclaimer: these are notes I took while reading this book. They include citations I found interesting or enlightening or particularly well-written. In some cases, I&rsquo;ve pointed out which of these applies to which citation; in others, I have not. Any benefit you gain from reading these notes is... [<a class="complete-text-link" href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3490">More</a>]</div></blockquote>]]>
  </summary>
      <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<html lang="en">
  <head>
    <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/themes/ice.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/fonts/raleway.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/core/medium.css">
  </head>
  <body>
<div class="style-controls">  <div class="page">
    <div class="page-body">
<div class="info-box-top">
<p>
Published by <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_user.php?name=marco" title="Marco von Ballmoos" class="visible">marco</a> on <span class="date-time">14. Jan 2018 23:33:47 (GMT-5)</span>
</p>
</div>
      <div class="text-flow wide">
  <blockquote class="quote abstract "><div>Disclaimer: these are notes I took while reading this book. They include citations I found interesting or enlightening or particularly well-written. In some cases, I&rsquo;ve pointed out which of these applies to which citation; in others, I have not. Any benefit you gain from reading these notes is purely incidental to the purpose they serve of reminding me what I once read. Please see Wikipedia for a summary if I&rsquo;ve failed to provide one sufficient for your purposes. If my notes serve to trigger an interest in this book, then I&rsquo;m happy for you.</div></blockquote><p>The book starts a bit slowly, but quickly picks up pace as the early mythology of the TP universe starts to weave into parts we know from the TV show. The story is told from the point-of-view of an FBI agent pulling together all of the threads, assisted immensely by a research document put together by someone called <em>The Archivist</em>. The agent’s contributions are solely in footnotes. It is there that ze [1] pursues the identity of the Archivist.</p>
<p>The story weaves in every UFO and presidential and military conspiracy theory known in the States, with JFK and Nixon featuring prominently. The ur-myth of Twin Peaks is rooted in the terror that the world has at the discovery and use of nuclear weapons—and the accompanying caution with which this discovery is observed by other beings. I say &ldquo;other beings&rdquo; because it is clear that the term &ldquo;extra-terrestrial&rdquo; is explicitly <em>not</em> appropriate. While the term &ldquo;otherworldly&rdquo; might fit, it&rsquo;s clear that there is a strong likelihood that these beings have been on the planet longer than sentient mankind.</p>
<p>It’s an interesting story, nicely told. I read it after watching all three seasons and it was quite satisfying.</p>
<p>In the end, the author’s initials TP stand for Tamara Preston. The identity of the Archivist? Major Garland Briggs.</p>
<p>The format is not very E-book–friendly. It includes many newspaper clippings that can only be properly read—especially in dimmed light—by zooming in and panning. They do, however, lend a realistic, investigative feel to the material, though they slow down reading considerably.</p>
<p><hr></p>
<div class="footnote-reference"><span id="footnote_DRAFTABLE_ENTRY_3490_1_body" class="footnote-number">[1]</span> He or she.</div><h2>Citations</h2><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;And then she started following Ed whenever he went to the Double R. Just staring at him and Norma through the window while he’s at the counter minding his own business. By now he’s getting the idea his little firecracker might be carrying an extra load of powder, and of course he doesn’t know what to do about&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 1951-1953</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;PRESIDENT NIXON: In my experience, what defines a crime depends on who’s getting screwed.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 2609-2610</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The years I’d spent among authentic native people had left me bored to death with the garden-variety neuroses of “modern Americans.” The maladaptations of disaffected housewives and hostile teenagers were symptomatic to me of a larger, collective societal disorder—all right, I’ll Cliff Note them for you: rising corporate greed, enabled by institutional corruption, fueled and distorted by dirty money, leading to generalized rampant materialism, militant ignorance, military triumphalism and widespread loss of spiritual authenticity—that was eating away at the foundation of our culture.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 3022-3026 by <cite>Jacoby</cite></div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;We are creatures of darkness and light, capable of barbarism and limitless cruelty, and also love, and laughter and the creation of the most sublime beauty. We are both these things, clearly, but which are we more of? I don’t know the answer. Is “evil” a thing—independent, outside of us—or is it an essential part of who we are? I don’t know the answer. Life is but a dream from which we seem able to only rarely awaken. Whatever it means is beyond words. Words lose their meaning when you look at them too long. “God.” “Science.” “Meaning.” Everything melts into silence. The trades have eased. The whitecaps are gone and there’s sunlight on the water. I’m going to go bury my brother now.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 3075-3081 by <cite>Jacoby</cite></div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;After he was escorted in to view his brother’s body in the honeymoon suite that morning–wearing only a smile no mortician in his right mind would try to remove–Dwayne tried to persuade Sheriff Truman to press homicide charges, claiming that a copy of the Kama Sutra found at the scene was the murder weapon. That was grief disguised as bluster; Dwayne, I believe, despite their quarrelsome differences, truly loved his brother. Of course nothing came of Dwayne’s talk about manslaughter. If anything, as news of the circumstances of his death leaked out, there was–among his male friends–universal envy that Doug Milford had stage-managed the perfect exit from the cockeyed caravan of life. As one of them–who shall remain nameless–said to me that day: “If that was manslaughter, sign me up.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 3157-3162</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;BRIGGS: You’re not who I thought you were. MILFORD: I’m the white rabbit, drawing you closer to the rabbit hole. And like the rabbit, I’m late for a very important date. You’re my replacement, Garland. You’re going to become the Watcher in the Woods. (The colonel rolled up his sleeve, revealing a series of three triangular marks or tattoos on the inside of his forearm.)&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 3239-3242</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;“A secret’s only a secret as long as you keep it. Once you tell someone it loses all its power–for good or ill–like that, it’s just another piece of information. But a real mystery can’t be solved, not completely. It’s always just out of reach, like a light around the corner; you might catch a glimpse of what it reveals, feel its warmth, but you can’t know the heart of it, not really. That’s what gives it value: It can’t be cracked, it’s bigger than you and me, bigger than everything we know. Those tight-ass suits can keep their secrets, they don’t add up to anything. This deep in the game, pal, I’ll take mystery every time.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 3264-3269</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;THE OWLS MAY INDEED NOT BE WHAT THEY SEEM BUT STILL SERVE AN IMPERATIVE FUNCTION: they remind us to look into the darkness.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 3397-3398</div></div>      </div>
      </div>
        <div class="footer">
    <div class="footer-data"><div class="footer-links"><ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/contact.php" title="">Contact</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/support.php" title="">Support</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/privacy.php" title="">Privacy</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/rights.php" title="">Rights</a></li></ul></div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="copyright">Copyright (c) 1999-2026 earthli.com. All Rights Reserved.</div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="versions">Powered by <ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore/app_news.php">earthli News 3.7</a></li><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore" title="">earthli WebCore&trade; 3.7</a></li></ul></div></div>    </div>
      </div>
  </div>  </body>
</html>
]]>
  </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
      <title type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[The Wise Man's Fear by Patrick Rothfuss (2011; read in 2017)]]>
  </title>
    <id>https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3492</id>
    <link href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3492"/>
    <updated>2018-01-14T23:03:32+01:00</updated>
    <author>
        <name type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[Marco von Ballmoos]]>
  </name>
      <uri>https://earthli.com/users/marco</uri>
    </author>
      <summary type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<blockquote class="quote abstract "><div>Disclaimer: these are notes I took while reading this book. They include citations I found interesting or enlightening or particularly well-written. In some cases, I&rsquo;ve pointed out which of these applies to which citation; in others, I have not. Any benefit you gain from reading these notes is... [<a class="complete-text-link" href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3492">More</a>]</div></blockquote>]]>
  </summary>
      <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<html lang="en">
  <head>
    <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/themes/ice.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/fonts/raleway.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/core/medium.css">
  </head>
  <body>
<div class="style-controls">  <div class="page">
    <div class="page-body">
<div class="info-box-top">
<p>
Published by <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_user.php?name=marco" title="Marco von Ballmoos" class="visible">marco</a> on <span class="date-time">14. Jan 2018 23:03:32 (GMT-5)</span>
</p>
<p>
Updated by <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_user.php?name=marco" title="Marco von Ballmoos" class="visible">marco</a> on <span class="date-time">27. Dec 2020 12:47:12 (GMT-5)</span>
</p>
</div>
      <div class="text-flow wide">
  <blockquote class="quote abstract "><div>Disclaimer: these are notes I took while reading this book. They include citations I found interesting or enlightening or particularly well-written. In some cases, I&rsquo;ve pointed out which of these applies to which citation; in others, I have not. Any benefit you gain from reading these notes is purely incidental to the purpose they serve of reminding me what I once read. Please see Wikipedia for a summary if I&rsquo;ve failed to provide one sufficient for your purposes. If my notes serve to trigger an interest in this book, then I&rsquo;m happy for you.</div></blockquote><p>This is the second book in the Kingkiller Chronicles, the story of Kvothe.</p>
<p>This, too, is a story of a modern world that has forgotten its origins, its old power. Where each step along the path of knowledge is on a newly visible but well-worn path. A rediscovery of ancient truth, of deeper currents beneath the eddies of the superficial, modern, meaningless and ephemeral world. The deep origins of the world of the Fae, the shapers and their God, the original and most powerful one. As if all that ensued was a fading of the original nova, much as our universe is the mere echo of the big bang. That is, perhaps, the difference between science fiction and fantasy: one tells of expansion from strength to strength, a climb out of benighted ignorance, whereas the other tells of a relearning of ancient pinnacles, lost in the mists of time. The shape of its vast greatness can be vaguely discerned, but not in any way recaptured.</p>
<p>Mortals live in their world of material goods, squabbling over table scraps, while deeper currents of power course through an unseen world, intrinsically entwined with theirs, but separate and accessible only through twisted passages like the Adem’s Lenthian or the Arcanist’s Heart of Stone, Alar or the Names of things. The lines of force of the world are accessible to precious few and then only through nigh-inscrutable byways with little relation to rhyme or reason. Only instinct and a meditative letting-go of all that one knows is sometimes the only way to perceive it, to say nothing of harnessing it.</p>
<p>The more one sees of this deeper world, the more easily one dips into its powerful eddies and currents, the more unmoored one becomes from the mortal realm. That is the nature of the Sleeping Mind. This concept was also mentioned in the Star Wars canon: access to the Force is only possible through slippery, peripheral means, exercising muscles over which there is, at least at first, only autonomic control.</p>
<p>The deep history is unknown to the surface dwellers, the Amyr are a warrior sect mere centuries old to them, the powerful evil of the Chandrian hidden and woven into inconsequence behind tapestries of children’s stories.</p>
<p>The Chandrian are mixed up in this somehow, nearly invisible in the mortal realm and deeply feared in the world of the Fae.</p>
<p>This tale is paralleled on our world as the superficial world in which most people live versus the deeper world of science and logic, the knowledge of which transforms so much magic to mundanity.</p>
<p>We see in Star Wars as well, when Luke discards the light saber: he has realized that this is the crude toy of a child, that the Sleeping Mind is much more powerful without such crude tools. It explains Luke’s look of disappointment when Rey still didn’t understand that the light saber isn&rsquo;t anything compared to the true power of the force, of the Sleeping Mind.</p>
<p>In a sense, these are all religious stories. This is a particularly interesting and good one. Kvothe continues at University, but then takes time off to seek patronage from the richest man in the kingdom, the Mair. He serves him well and climbs the echelons of power there before being sent on an excursion to wipe out a nest of bandits in the Mair&rsquo;s lands.</p>
<p>This he does with a band of mercenaries, one of whom (Tempi) is Adem, a sort of Shaolin cult. They find the bandits, Kvothe uses his power to call the wind and his arcanist tricks to overwhelm them—and catches a glimpse of their leader, who is Cinder, of the Chandrian. They collect a tremendous amount of gold from the defeated bandits&rsquo; camp and head back. On the way, Kvothe is seduced by Felurian, a queen among the Fae, a mystical sidereal realm. We learn all about that realm, hear the Cthaeh&rsquo;s oracular predictions and then witness Kvothe&rsquo;s miraculous return to the mortal world. From here, he learns more of Tempi&rsquo;s martial art and then accompanies him back to his lands. Here he is trained in the art and passes an initiation rite, once again using the name of the wind. Instead of staying at the school, he leaves, defending the honor of the Edema Ruh as well as saving some damsels in distress along the way. He returns to the Mair, then to University. He doesn&rsquo;t have a patronage, but he does have guaranteed tuition as well as a salary from the Mair. He leverages these things to enrich himself and establish a solid life at the University. He now knows how to learn what Elodin is teaching (which is good, because that&rsquo;s the smartest man in the book). He finds Denna again and reconciles with her, after a fashion.</p>
<p>The book ends with Kvothe (Kote) once again the innkeeper, long after the time of the tales he tells. We all wait with bated breath for the final installment. Recommended.</p>
<h2>Citations</h2><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Kote wiped at the bar for a long moment, as if reluctant to speak. “I think things are usually bad one way or another,” he said. “It might be that only us older folk can see it.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 9</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;“It’s not just you,” Kote said. “Things are bad, and my gut tells me they’ll get worse yet. It wouldn’t hurt a man to get ready for a hard winter. And maybe see that he can defend himself if need be.” The innkeeper shrugged. “That’s what my gut tells me, anyway.” Graham’s mouth set into a grim line. He bobbed his head once in a serious nod. “I’m glad it’s not just my gut, I suppose.” Then he forced a grin and began to cuff up his shirt-sleeves as he turned to the door. “Still,” he said, “you’ve got to make hay while the sun shines.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 10</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Luckily, Manet played with the precision of a gear-clock: no mislaid tricks, no wild bids, no hunches.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 38</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Manet gave a low chuckle. “That is a woman and a half,” he said. “Which means she’s five times more woman than any of you know what to do with.” At a different time, such a statement might have goaded the three of us into swaggering protest. But Manet stated it without a hint of taunt in his voice, so we let it pass. Especially as it was probably true. “Not for me,” Simmon said. “She always looks like she’s getting ready to wrestle someone. Or go off and break a wild horse.” “She does.” Manet chuckled again. “If we were living in a better age they’d build a temple around a woman like that.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 42</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;“Do you know what would happen if you tried to knife Ambrose?” Simmon asked. I thought for a second. It was like trying to remember what you’d eaten for breakfast a month ago. “There’d be a trial, I suppose,” I said slowly, “and people would buy me drinks.” Fela muffled a laugh behind her hand.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 72</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;“But, if you’re teaching other students, why not me?” “Because you are too eager to be properly patient,” he said flippantly. “You’re too proud to listen properly. And you’re too clever by half. That’s the worst of it.” “Some masters prefer clever students,” I muttered as we emerged into a wide hallway. “Yes,” Elodin said. “Dal and Kilvin and Arwyl like clever students. Go study with one of them. Both our lives will be considerably easier because of it.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 81</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Elodin turned to look at me, his dark eyes serious. “You think you can trust me to teach you,” he said. “You think I will keep you safe. But that is the worst sort of foolishness.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 82</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;But Elodin just looked at me. “What makes you think I’m not teaching you?” he asked, puzzled. “Aside from the fact that you refuse to learn.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 83</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;But how quickly you can finger notes is the smallest part of music. The real key is timing. It’s like telling a joke. Anyone can remember the words. Anyone can repeat it. But making someone laugh requires more than that. Telling a joke faster doesn’t make it funnier. As with many things, hesitation is better than hurry.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 94</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;“In point of fact,” Wilem said, “I have no use for blood, and play for money instead.” He fingered through his purse until he found a jot, which he pressed firmly onto the table. “I am willing to play a practice game, but if she finds the thought insulting, I will thrash her and take whatever she is willing to lay on the table.” Denna grinned at that. “You’re my kind of guy, Wil.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 143</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;“Clever,” Wilem chuckled. “So clever. I went a year before I thought to ask that.” He eyed her in admiration. “Some energy is lost into the air.” He waved one hand. “Some goes into the objects themselves, and some goes into the body of the sympathist who is controlling the link.” He frowned. “That can get dangerful.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 149</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Sleat’s expression remained impassive, his body loose and relaxed. But I could see a slight tension in his shoulders. Very little escapes me when I’m watching closely. “They say that, do they?” I gave a shrug that put his to shame. My shrug was so nonchalant it would make a cat jealous. “I’m a musician. I play three nights a span in a busy tavern. I hear all manner of things.” I reached for my mug. “And what have you heard of me?”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 203</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Elodin’s face lit up. “That’s it exactly!” he said. “Translation. All explicit knowledge is translated knowledge, and all translation is imperfect.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 230</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;“Re’lar Kvothe,” he said seriously. “I am trying to wake your sleeping mind to the subtle language the world is whispering. I am trying to seduce you into understanding. I am trying to teach you.” He leaned forward until his face was almost touching mine. “Quit grabbing at my tits.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 231</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;“It is a high place with a chance of falling. Things are more easily seen from edges. Danger rouses the sleeping mind. It makes some things clear. Seeing things is a part of being a namer.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 359</div></div><p>Elodin has the best lines.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;“Things have changed. There are even fewer edges now than there were before. The world is less wild. There are fewer magics, more secrets, and only a handful of people who know the name of the wind.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 360</div></div><p>Elodin again.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;“Remember: there are three things all wise men fear: the sea in storm, a night with no moon, and the anger of a gentle man.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 365</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;On the other hand, I had a vast wealth of secondary knowledge. Ten thousand romantic songs, plays, and stories taken all together had to be worth something. And on the negative side, I’d seen Simmon pursue nearly every woman within three miles of the University with the doomed enthusiasm of a child trying to fly. What’s more, I had watched a hundred men dash themselves to pieces against Denna like ships attempting to ignore the tide.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 458</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Bredon’s expression softened, and his voice became almost like an entreaty. “Tak reflects the subtle turning of the world. It is a mirror we hold to life. No one wins a dance, boy. The point of dancing is the motion that a body makes. A well-played game of tak reveals the moving of a mind. There is a beauty to these things for those with eyes to see it.” He gestured at the brief and brutal lay of stones between us. “Look at that. Why would I ever want to win a game such as this?” I looked down at the board. “The point isn’t to win?” I asked. “The point,” Bredon said grandly, “is to play a beautiful game.” He lifted his hands and shrugged, his face breaking into a beatific smile. “Why would I want to win anything other than a beautiful game?”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 448</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Modern philosophers scorn Teccam, but they are vultures picking at the bones of a giant. Quibble all you like, Teccam understood the shape of the world.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 490</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;“Not pointless,” I protested. “It’s the questions we can’t answer that teach us the most. They teach us how to think. If you give a man an answer, all he gains is a little fact. But give him a question and he’ll look for his own answers.” I spread my blanket on the ground and folded over the threadbare tinker’s cloak to wrap myself in. “That way, when he finds the answers, they’ll be precious to him. The harder the question, the harder we hunt. The harder we hunt, the more we learn. An impossible question …” I trailed off as realization burst onto me. Elodin. That is what Elodin had been doing. Everything he’d done in his class. The games, the hints, the cryptic riddling. They were all questions of a sort. Marten shook his head and wandered off, but I was lost in my thoughts and hardly noticed. I had wanted answers, and in spite of all I had thought, Elodin had been trying to give them to me. What I had taken as a malicious crypticism on his part was actually a persistent urging toward the truth. I sat there, silent and stunned by the scope of his instruction. By my lack of understanding. My lack of sight.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 558</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;“Yes. Law is bridle and bit. It controls from outside. The Lethani …” He pointed between his eyes, then at his chest. “… lives inside. Lethani helps decide. Law is made because many have no understanding of Lethani.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 587</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;“No. If you fall and break a leg in mountain pass, it is still the pass. If I fail while following the Lethani, it is still the Lethani.” Serious. “This is why we are talking now. Today. With your knife. That was not the Lethani. It was not a right thing.” “I was afraid you would be hurt.” “The Lethani does not put down roots in fear,” he said, sounding as if he were reciting. “Would it be the Lethani to let you be hurt?” A shrug. “Perhaps.” “Would it be of the Lethani to let you be …” Extreme emphasis. “Hurt?” “Perhaps no. But they did not. To be first with the knife is not of the Lethani. If you win and are first with the knife, you do not win.” Vast disapproval.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 588</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Tempi made a triumphant gesture. “Yes! You can do many things when meeting tinker. But there is only one right thing.” He calmed himself a little. Caution. “But only doing is not the Lethani. First knowing, then doing. That is the Lethani.” I thought on this for a moment. “So being polite is the Lethani?” “Not polite. Not kind. Not good. Not duty. The Lethani is none of these. Each moment. Each choice. All different.” He gave me a penetrating look. “Do you understand?” “No.” Happiness. Approval. Tempi got to his feet, nodding. “It is good you know you do not. Good that you say. That is also of the Lethani.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 589</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;It was during one of our many breaks that Tempi began my true instruction in the Ketan. Fool that I was, I’d assumed he had already been teaching me. The truth was, he had merely been correcting my more horrifying mistakes because they irritated him. Much the same way I’d be tempted to tune someone’s lute if they were playing off-key in the same room. This instruction was a different thing entirely. We started at the beginning of the Ketan and he corrected my mistakes. All my mistakes. He found eighteen in the first motion alone, and there are more than a hundred motions in the Ketan. I quickly began to have doubts about this apprenticeship.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 628</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;There was only one person I’d ever heard whose voice was similar to this. Elodin. On rare occasions his voice would fill the air as if the world itself were listening. Felurian’s voice was not resonant. It did not fill the forest glade. Hers was the hush before a sudden summer storm. It was soft as a brushing feather. It made my heart step sideways in my chest.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 637</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;felt as if this was the only time in my life I had been fully awake. Everything looked clear and sharp, as if I was seeing with a new set of eyes. As if I wasn’t bothering with my eyes at all, and was looking at the world directly with my mind. The sleeping mind, some piece of me realized faintly. No longer sleeping, I thought and smiled.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 642</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;I could see a slight shimmer in the air around Felurian, some shred of her power returning. I ignored it as I struggled frantically to keep some part of what I had learned. But it was like trying to hold a handful of sand. If you have ever dreamed of flying, then come awake, dismayed to realize you had lost the trick of it, you have some inkling how I felt.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 644</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;You might think these thousand facts gave me some insight into the Fae. That I somehow fit them together like puzzle pieces and discovered the true shape of things. A thousand facts is quite a lot, after all…. But no. A thousand seems like a lot, but there are more stars than that in the sky, and they make neither a map nor a mural.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 657</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;“When you know the name of a thing you have mastery over it,” I said. “no,” she said, startling me with the weight of rebuke in her voice. “mastery was not given. they had the deep knowing of things. not mastery. to swim is not mastery over the water. to eat an apple is not mastery of the apple.” She gave me a sharp look. “do you understand?”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 672</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Felurian had worked her way up from starlight and was wefting moonlight into the shaed. She didn’t look up from her work when she replied, “so many thoughts, my kvothe. you know too much to be happy.” That sounded uncomfortably like something Elodin would say.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 677</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;“Oracle. How quaint. Do not try to pin me with small names. I am Cthaeh. I am. I see. I know.” Two iridescent blue-black wings fluttered separately where there had been a butterfly before. “At times I speak.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 681</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;“What can you tell me of the Amyr?” “Kyxxs,” the Cthaeh spat an irritated noise. “What is this? Why so guarded? Why the games? Ask me of the Chandrian and have done.” I stood, stunned and silent. “Surprised? Why should you be? Goodness boy, you’re like a clear pool. I can see ten feet through you, and you’re barely three feet deep.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 682</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;“Are you going to try to kill the Chandrian?” The voice sounded fascinated, almost taken aback. “Track and kill them all yourself? My word, how will you manage it? Haliax has been alive five thousand years. Five thousand years and not one second’s sleep. “Clever to go looking for the Amyr, I suppose. Even one proud as you can recognize the need for help. The Order might give it to you. Trouble is they’re as hard to find as the Seven themselves. Oh dear, oh dear. Whatever is a brave young boy to do?”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 682</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The Cthaeh gave a thin, dry chuckle. “Blood, bracken, and bone, I wish you creatures had the wit to appreciate me. Whatever else you might forget, remember what I just said. Eventually you’ll get the joke. I guarantee. You’ll laugh when the time comes.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 683</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;“What?” the Cthaeh asked. “Are you looking for a different why? Are you wondering why I tell you these things? What good comes of it? Maybe this Cinder did me a bad turn once. Maybe it amuses me to set a young pup like you snapping at his heels. Maybe the soft creaking of your tendons as you clench your fists is like a sweet symphony to me. Oh, yes it is. And you can be sure.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 684</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Without taking his eyes from Chronicler, Bast laid his bloody palm flat on the table. The wood groaned and the broken timbers snapped back into place with a sudden crackling sound. Bast lifted his hand, then brought it down sharply on the table, and the dark runnels of ink and beer suddenly twisted and shaped themselves into a jet-black crow that burst into flight, circling the taproom once. Bast caught it with both hands and tore the bird carelessly in half, casting the pieces into the air where they exploded into great washes of flame the color of blood. It all happened in the space of a single breath. “Everything you know about the Fae could fit inside a thimble,” Bast said, looking at the scribe with no expression at all, his voice flat and even. “How dare you doubt me? You have no idea who I am.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 690</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Jax spoke to the Cthaeh before he stole the moon, and that sparked the entire creation war. Lanre spoke to the Cthaeh before he orchestrated the betrayal of Myr Tariniel. The creation of the Nameless. The Scaendyne. They can all be traced back to the Cthaeh.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 691</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;“It’s not over if you’re still here,” Chronicler said. “It’s not a tragedy if you’re still alive.” Bast nodded eagerly at this, looking back at Kvothe. Kvothe looked at both of them for a moment, then smiled and chuckled low in his chest. “Oh,” he said fondly. “You’re both so young.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 692</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;She moved like nothing I had ever seen. It wasn’t that she was fast, though she was fast, but that was not the heart of it. Shehyn moved perfectly, never taking two steps when one would do. Never moving four inches when she only needed three. She moved like something out of a story, more fluid and graceful than Felurian dancing.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 724</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Vashet leaned forward seriously. “Part of the problem is with your language,” she said. “Aturan is very explicit. It is very precise and direct. Our language is rich with implication, so it is easier for us to accept the existence of things that cannot be explained. The Lethani is the greatest of these.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 743</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;As my student, it is only tolerable because you are a barbarian. It’s as if Tempi brought home a dog that can whistle. The fact that you are out of tune stands quite beside the point.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 745</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Aturan was like a wide, shallow pool; it had many words, all very specific and precise. Ademic was like a deep well. There were fewer words, but they each had many meanings. A well-spoken sentence in Aturan is a straight line pointing. A well-spoken sentence in Adem is like a spiderweb, each strand with a meaning of its own, a piece of something greater, more complex.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 745</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Vashet was kind enough not to laugh at me again. “Shehyn is not the head of the school because no one can beat her. What an odd notion. What chaos that would be, everything tipping this way and that, changing with the luck of one fight or another.” She shook her head. “Shehyn is the head because she is a marvelous teacher, and because her understanding of the Lethani is deep. She is the head because she is wise in the ways of the world, and because she is clever at dealing with troublesome problems.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 770</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;She sighed. “Kvothe, you need to remember. You come from a barbarous place. Much of what you grew up thinking is quite wrongheaded and foolish. None of it as much as the strange customs you barbarians have built around your sexplay.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 774</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Gran put her cup down gently on the table, her expression composed again. “If a leg goes bad, you cut it off.” She made a firm gesture with the flat of her hand, then picked up her slice of pudding and began to eat it with her fingers. “And some folk need killing. That’s all there is to it.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 891</div></div>      </div>
      </div>
        <div class="footer">
    <div class="footer-data"><div class="footer-links"><ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/contact.php" title="">Contact</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/support.php" title="">Support</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/privacy.php" title="">Privacy</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/rights.php" title="">Rights</a></li></ul></div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="copyright">Copyright (c) 1999-2026 earthli.com. All Rights Reserved.</div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="versions">Powered by <ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore/app_news.php">earthli News 3.7</a></li><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore" title="">earthli WebCore&trade; 3.7</a></li></ul></div></div>    </div>
      </div>
  </div>  </body>
</html>
]]>
  </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
      <title type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[American Gods by Neil Gaiman (2002) (read in 2018)]]>
  </title>
    <id>https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3496</id>
    <link href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3496"/>
    <updated>2018-01-14T14:15:29+01:00</updated>
    <author>
        <name type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[Marco von Ballmoos]]>
  </name>
      <uri>https://earthli.com/users/marco</uri>
    </author>
      <summary type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<blockquote class="quote abstract "><div>Disclaimer: these are notes I took while reading this book. They include citations I found interesting or enlightening or particularly well-written. In some cases, I&rsquo;ve pointed out which of these applies to which citation; in others, I have not. Any benefit you gain from reading these notes is... [<a class="complete-text-link" href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3496">More</a>]</div></blockquote>]]>
  </summary>
      <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<html lang="en">
  <head>
    <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/themes/ice.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/fonts/raleway.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/core/medium.css">
  </head>
  <body>
<div class="style-controls">  <div class="page">
    <div class="page-body">
<div class="info-box-top">
<p>
Published by <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_user.php?name=marco" title="Marco von Ballmoos" class="visible">marco</a> on <span class="date-time">14. Jan 2018 14:15:29 (GMT-5)</span>
</p>
</div>
      <div class="text-flow wide">
  <blockquote class="quote abstract "><div>Disclaimer: these are notes I took while reading this book. They include citations I found interesting or enlightening or particularly well-written. In some cases, I&rsquo;ve pointed out which of these applies to which citation; in others, I have not. Any benefit you gain from reading these notes is purely incidental to the purpose they serve of reminding me what I once read. Please see Wikipedia for a summary if I&rsquo;ve failed to provide one sufficient for your purposes. If my notes serve to trigger an interest in this book, then I&rsquo;m happy for you.</div></blockquote><p>This is a fantasy novel about gods. It is less about the nature of faith and more about the gods themselves: on how they are called into being by the myriad flickers of belief of humans, gaining power as this belief hardens to nigh-fanaticism. All gods have power, but many have faded as their believers have faded.</p>
<p>There are the old gods of early man, the gods of the Native Americans, the all-but-forgotten gods of even their precursors, the Egyptian pantheon, more recent African gods, the Norse pantheon, the plethora of spirits and pixies (piskies) and kobolds and gremlins and leprechauns of Europe. Gaiman doesn&rsquo;t once mention any Greek or Roman gods, oddly enough.</p>
<p>When people came over from Europe to America, they brought their gods with them. They nurtured the flame of belief in their minds, carrying a simulacrum from one shore to another. The original god remained in Europe or Africa or Asia and was aware of its copy in the new world. The copy flourished after a fashion, but soon discovered that America was poor soil for gods. Faith and belief guttered  and the gods were forgotten in favor of new gods, like Mammon. The copies become shadows, imbued with power, but left to fend for themselves in whatever way they could, going along to get along.</p>
<p>The Gods of Egypt run a funeral home, ferrying the dead to their final destination, as they always have. Odin, the all-father, is a grifter, running one scheme/scam after another. Bathsheba is a prostitute, consuming her faithful to stay alive.</p>
<p>The story centers on Shadow. He is serving time in prison for a crime of violence. He is due to be out soon. He has improved himself. He is a giant of a man, a former physical trainer. He has learned the ancient philosophers. He has learned coin tricks. His mind is clean and his soul is more-or-less pure. He is a stoic. He yearns to return to his wife and start a fresh life.</p>
<p>He is allowed to leave a few days early for a horrible reason: his wife is dead. She was killed in a car accident with his best friend, who was also to be his future employer. Shadow&rsquo;s dreams are truncated neatly. He has nowhere to go; nothing to do. He has only a funeral to attend and then nothing.</p>
<p>This is where Mr. Wednesday (named after his own day, HINT) swoops in to draw Shadow into his own plans. Shadow learns many things and meets many people (mostly gods) and learns that there is a war coming: between the old gods and the new.</p>
<p>The new gods are television, media, the Internet and so on. The new gods have the arrogance of youth, brash and powerful, feeling the power of the faith of millions coursing through their veins. They don&rsquo;t see the undercurrents of rot in America; they don&rsquo;t see that faith cannot take root in fallow soil. They don&rsquo;t know, as many of the old gods do, that they are doomed. Perhaps some do and they fear their demise and, American to the core, they ignore what they know and plow ahead, heedless of the damage and harm they cause for a few more moments of fleeting power.</p>
<p>The land is represented by a buffalo and is the most powerful, but least felt or seen. He/she appears only in Shadow&rsquo;s dreams. Whiskey Jack is also of the land, an odd bystander who exists outside of belief. The native gods are the ones most comfortable in this landscape, as is to be expected.</p>
<p>Wednesday schemes with  &lsquo;Low Key&rsquo; Lyesmith (guess who?) to bring the &ldquo;war&rdquo; to a head, a bloodbath of heretofore unheard-of proportions, all to fuel their power: Odin/Wotan&rsquo;s because the battle would be dedicated to him and Loki&rsquo;s because chaos is his milieu. Shadow foils this plan with his stoic self-sacrifice that ends up not killing him, but making him stronger. He tells the gods that they have been fooled into hating each other, into killing each other. They disperse, most going back to their meager existence on the edges of humanity. The status quo continues.</p>
<p>Gaiman weaves this tale around many side-narratives and fables of how various gods came to be, how they were carried over, how they survived. Recommended.</p>
<h2>Citations</h2><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;You’re walking on gallows ground, and there’s a hempen rope around your neck and a raven-bird on each shoulder, waiting for your eyes, and the gallows tree has deep roots, for it stretches from heaven to hell, and our world is only the branch from which the rope is swinging.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 237</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Death had vanished from the streets of America, thought Shadow; now it happened in hospital rooms and in ambulances. We must not startle the living, thought Shadow. Mr. Ibis had told him that they move the dead about in some hospitals on the lower level of apparently empty covered gurneys, the deceased traveling their own paths in their own covered ways.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 239</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Mad Sweeney himself began to throw both details and irrelevancies into Ibis’s narrative (“…such a girl she was, with breasts cream-colored and spackled with freckles, with the tips of them the rich reddish pink of the sunrise on a day when it’ll be bucketing down before noon but glorious again by supper…”) and then Sweeney was trying, with both hands, to explain the history of the gods in Ireland, wave after wave of them as they came in from Gaul and from Spain and from every damn place, each wave of them transforming the last gods into trolls and fairies and every damn creature until Holy Mother Church herself arrived and every god in Ireland was transformed into a fairy or a saint or a dead king without so much as a by-your-leave…&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 243</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>"They think,” said Shadow, “that they think they’re the white hats.”</p>
<p>“Of course they do. There’s never been a true war that wasn’t fought between two sets of people who were certain they were in the right. The really dangerous people believe that they are doing whatever they are doing solely and only because it is without question the right thing to do. And that is what makes them dangerous.”</p>
<p>“And you?” asked Shadow. “Why are you doing what you’re doing?”</p>
<p>“Because I want to,” said Wednesday. And then he grinned. “So that’s all right.”</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 251</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;There are stories that are true, in which each individual’s tale is unique and tragic, and the worst of the tragedy is that we have heard it before, and we cannot allow ourselves to feel it too deeply. We build a shell around it like an oyster dealing with a painful particle of grit, coating it with smooth pearl layers in order to cope. This is how we walk and talk and function, day in, day out, immune to others’ pain and loss. If it were to touch us it would cripple us or make saints of us; but, for the most part, it does not touch us. We cannot allow it to.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 345</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Tonight, as you eat, reflect if you can: there are children starving in the world, starving in numbers larger than the mind can easily hold, up in the big numbers where an error of a million here, a million there, can be forgiven. It may be uncomfortable for you to reflect upon this or it may not, but still, you will eat.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 345</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;We need individual stories. Without individuals we see only numbers: a thousand dead, a hundred thousand dead, “casualties may rise to a million.” With individual stories, the statistics become people—but even that is a lie, for the people continue to suffer in numbers that themselves are numbing and meaningless&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 347</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Look, see the child’s swollen, swollen belly, and the flies that crawl at the corners of his eyes, his skeletal limbs: will it make it easier for you to know his name, his age, his dreams, his fears? To see him from the inside? And if it does, are we not doing a disservice to his sister, who lies in the searing dust beside him, a distorted, distended caricature of a human child? And there, if we feel for them, are they now more important to us than a thousand other children touched by the same famine, a thousand other young lives who will soon be food for the flies’ own myriad squirming children?&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 347</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Wututu was put in with the children, not with the women; and she was not chained, merely locked in. Agasu, her brother, was forced in with the men, in chains, packed like herrings. It stank under that deck, although the crew had scrubbed it down since their last cargo. It was a stink that had entered the wood: the smell of fear and bile and diarrhea and death, of fever and madness and hate.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 350</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;She could have told you of her daughter, twelve years old and already eight months pregnant by an overseer, and how they dug a hole in the red earth to take her daughter’s pregnant belly, and then they whipped her until her back had bled. Despite the carefully dug hole, her daughter had lost her baby and her life on a Sunday morning, when all the white folks were in church…&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 361</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;America has invested her religion as well as her morality in sound income-paying securities. She has adopted the unassailable position of a nation blessed because it deserves to be blessed; and her sons, whatever other theologies they may affect or disregard, subscribe unreservedly to this national creed.</p>
<p>&ldquo;—AGNES REPPLIER, TIMES AND TENDENCIES&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 365</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;“It’s a holy place,” said Wednesday. “That’s the American Way—they need to give people an excuse to come and worship. These days, people can’t just go and see a mountain. Thus, Mister Gutzon Borglum’s tremendous presidential faces. Once they were carved, permission was granted, and now the people drive out in their multitudes to see something in the flesh that they’ve already seen on a thousand postcards.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 366</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;They will win,” said Whiskey Jack flatly. “They won already. You lost already. Like the white man and my people. They won. And when they lost, they made treaties. Then they broke the treaties. And they won again. I’m not fighting for another lost cause.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 377</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;It’s like the idiots who figure that hummingbirds worry about their weight or tooth decay or some such nonsense, maybe they just want to spare hummingbirds the evils of sugar,” explained Wednesday. “So they fill the hummingbird feeders with fucking NutraSweet. The birds come to the feeders and they drink it. Then they die, because their food contains no calories even though their little tummies are full. That’s Paul Bunyan for you. Nobody ever told Paul Bunyan stories. Nobody ever believed in Paul Bunyan. He came staggering out of a New York ad agency in 1910 and filled the nation’s myth stomach with empty calories.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 378</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;They took our lands, they settled here, now they’re leaving. They go south. They go west. Maybe if we wait for enough of them to move to New York and Miami and L.A. we can take the whole of the middle back without a fight.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 383</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;I believe that life is a game, life is a cruel joke and that life is what happens when you’re alive and that you might as well lie back and enjoy it.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 425</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;“This isn’t about what is,” said Mr. Nancy. “It’s about what people think is. It’s all imaginary anyway. That’s why it’s important. People only fight over imaginary things.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 462</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;You got to understand the god thing. It’s not magic. Not exactly. It’s about focus. It’s about being you, but the you that people believe in. It’s about being the concentrated, magnified essence of you. It’s about becoming thunder, or the power of a running horse, or wisdom. You take all the belief, all the prayers, and they become a kind of certainty, something that lets you become bigger, cooler, more than human. You crystallize.” He paused. “And then one day they forget about you, and they don’t believe in you, and they don’t sacrifice, and they don’t care, and the next thing you know you’re running a three-card monte game on the corner of Broadway and Forty-third.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 479</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;“Think of us as symbols—we’re the dream that humanity creates to make sense of the shadows on the cave wall.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 519</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>“It’s not going to be a war.” <br>
“Then what is it?”</p>
<p>Whiskey Jack crushed the beer can between his hands, pressing it until it was flat. “Look,” he said, and pointed to the waterfall. The sun was high enough that it caught the waterfall spray: a rainbow nimbus hung in the air. Shadow thought it was the most beautiful thing he had ever seen. “It’s going to be a bloodbath,” said Whiskey Jack, flatly. </p>
<p>Shadow saw it then. He saw it all, stark in its simplicity. He shook his head, then he began to chuckle, and he shook his head some more, and the chuckle became a full-throated laugh.</p>
<p>“You okay?”</p>
<p>“I’m fine,” said Shadow. “I just saw the hidden Indians. Not all of them. But I saw them anyhow.” “Probably Ho Chunk, then. Those guys never could hide worth a damn.” He looked up at the sun. “Time to go back,” he said. He stood up. “It’s a two-man con,” said Shadow. “It’s not a war at all, is it?” Whiskey Jack patted Shadow’s arm. “You’re not so dumb,” he said.</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 557</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;She wondered how far he had traveled, and what it had cost him to return. He was not the first whose return she had initiated, and she knew that, soon enough, the million-year stare would fade, and the memories and the dreams that he had brought back from the tree would be elided by the world of things you could touch. That was the way it always went.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 566</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;People believe, thought Shadow. It’s what people do. They believe. And then they will not take responsibility for their beliefs; they conjure things, and do not trust the conjurations. People populate the darkness; with ghosts, with gods, with electrons, with tales. People imagine, and people believe: and it is that belief, that rock-solid belief, that makes things happen.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 580</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Shadow felt sorry for them all. There was an arrogance to the new ones. Shadow could see that. But there was also a fear. They were afraid that unless they kept pace with a changing world, unless they remade and redrew and rebuilt the world in their image, their time would already be over.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 581</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;One describes a tale best by telling the tale. You see? The way one describes a story, to oneself or to the world, is by telling the story. It is a balancing act and it is a dream. The more accurate the map, the more it resembles the territory. The most accurate map possible would be the territory, and thus would be perfectly accurate and perfectly useless. The tale is the map which is the territory. You must remember this.</p>
<p>&ldquo;—FROM THE NOTEBOOKS OF MR. IBIS&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 589</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;He sat down on a grassy bank and looked at the city that surrounded him, and thought, one day he would have to go home. And one day he would have to make a home to go back to. He wondered whether home was a thing that happened to a place after a while, or if it was something that you found in the end, if you simply walked and waited and willed it long enough.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 633</div></div>      </div>
      </div>
        <div class="footer">
    <div class="footer-data"><div class="footer-links"><ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/contact.php" title="">Contact</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/support.php" title="">Support</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/privacy.php" title="">Privacy</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/rights.php" title="">Rights</a></li></ul></div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="copyright">Copyright (c) 1999-2026 earthli.com. All Rights Reserved.</div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="versions">Powered by <ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore/app_news.php">earthli News 3.7</a></li><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore" title="">earthli WebCore&trade; 3.7</a></li></ul></div></div>    </div>
      </div>
  </div>  </body>
</html>
]]>
  </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
      <title type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[The Mammoth Book of the Best of Best New SF by Gardner Dozois (2007) (read in 2017)]]>
  </title>
    <id>https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3453</id>
    <link href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3453"/>
    <updated>2017-12-03T22:35:19+01:00</updated>
    <author>
        <name type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[Marco von Ballmoos]]>
  </name>
      <uri>https://earthli.com/users/marco</uri>
    </author>
      <summary type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<blockquote class="quote abstract "><div>Disclaimer: these are notes I took while reading this book. They include citations I found interesting or enlightening or particularly well-written. In some cases, I&rsquo;ve pointed out which of these applies to which citation; in others, I have not. Any benefit you gain from reading these notes is... [<a class="complete-text-link" href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3453">More</a>]</div></blockquote>]]>
  </summary>
      <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<html lang="en">
  <head>
    <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/themes/ice.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/fonts/raleway.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/core/medium.css">
  </head>
  <body>
<div class="style-controls">  <div class="page">
    <div class="page-body">
<div class="info-box-top">
<p>
Published by <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_user.php?name=marco" title="Marco von Ballmoos" class="visible">marco</a> on <span class="date-time">3. Dec 2017 22:35:19 (GMT-5)</span>
</p>
</div>
      <div class="text-flow wide">
  <blockquote class="quote abstract "><div>Disclaimer: these are notes I took while reading this book. They include citations I found interesting or enlightening or particularly well-written. In some cases, I&rsquo;ve pointed out which of these applies to which citation; in others, I have not. Any benefit you gain from reading these notes is purely incidental to the purpose they serve of reminding me what I once read. Please see Wikipedia for a summary if I&rsquo;ve failed to provide one sufficient for your purposes. If my notes serve to trigger an interest in this book, then I&rsquo;m happy for you.</div></blockquote><p>This is a gigantic collection of science-fiction short stories and novellas. From the title, it&rsquo;s the &ldquo;best of the best&rdquo;. That is, there is a &ldquo;best of&rdquo; collection edited every year by Gardner Dozois—and this is a &ldquo;best of&rdquo; just the stories already distilled from those works. There is a wide range of authors represented, though almost all of them have won one or many more of the most renowned and prestigious sci-fi and fantasy awards, like the Hugo and/or the Nebula. The stories are, for the most part, extremely good and well-worth reading. As someone who raised himself on a diet of golden-age and silver-age science fiction as well as a lot of 80s and 90s science fiction, it&rsquo;s really interesting to see where things have gone over the last 20 years during which I&rsquo;ve been paying far less-close attention (though I never went away entirely: I follow some authors, like Gibson and Stephenson and Egan and Baxter very closely).</p>
<h2>Citations</h2><h2><em>Salvador</em> by <em>Lucius Shepard</em></h2><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;He felt weak and weakening, as if threads of himself were being spun loose and sucked into the blackness. He had popped three ampules prior to the firefight, and his experience of Tecolutla had been a kind of mad whirling dance through the streets, spraying erratic bursts that appeared to be writing weird names on the walls. The leader of the Sandinistas had worn a mask – a gray face with a surprised hole of a mouth and pink circles around the eyes. A ghost face. Dantzler had been afraid of the mask and had poured round after round into it.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 38</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;He saw nothing aberrant in this; even the doctors would admit that men were little more than organized pretense. If he was different from other men, it was only that he had a deeper awareness of the principles on which his personality was founded.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 45</div></div><h2><em>Flying Saucer Rock and Roll</em> by <em>Howard Waldrop</em></h2><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The sun had just gone down, and Sparks was a silhouette against the purpling sky that poked between the buildings.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 97</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Leroy sang like he was Frankie Lymon – not just some kid from the projects who wanted to be him – and the Kool-Tones were the Teenagers, and they began to pull and heave that song like it was a dead whale. And soon they had it in the water, and then it was swimming a little, then it was moving, and then the sonofabitch started spouting water, and that was the place where Leroy went into the falsetto “wyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyy,” and instead of chopping it where it should have been, he kept on.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 102</div></div><h2><em>Dinner in Audogast</em> by <em>Bruce Sterling</em></h2><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The man inched into the lamplight like a crippled insect. His voluminous dust-gray cloak was stained with sweat, and nameless exudations. He was an albino. His pink eyes were shrouded with cataracts, and he had lost a foot, and several fingers, to leprosy. One shoulder was much lower than the other, suggesting a hunchback, and the stub of his shin was scarred by the gnawing of canal-worms.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 111</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;death comes in its own time, as it will to all of you.” Manimenesh cleared his throat. “Can you see our destinies, then?” “I see the world,” said the Sufferer. “To see the fate of one man is to follow a single ant in a hill.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 112</div></div><h2><em>The Winter Market</em> by <em>William Gibson</em></h2><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;He cruises Greater Van in a spavined truck-thing chopped down from an ancient Mercedes airporter, its roof lost under a wallowing rubber bag half-filled with natural gas. He looks for things that fit some strange design scrawled on the inside of his forehead by whatever serves him as Muse.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 139</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Trash fires gutter in steel canisters around the Market. The snow still falls and kids huddle over the flames like arthritic crows, hopping from foot to foot, wind whipping their dark coats. Up in Fairview’s arty slum-tumble, someone’s laundry has frozen solid on the line, pink squares of bedsheet standing out against the background dinge and the confusion of satellite dishes and solar panels. Some ecologist’s eggbeater windmill goes round and round, round and round, giving a whirling finger to the Hydro rates.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 144</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;She’s big because she was what they are, only more so. She knew, man. No dreams, no hope. You can’t see the cages on those kids, Casey, but more and more they’re twigging to it, that they aren’t going anywhere.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 148</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;I didn’t attain a state of partytime that night. Neither did I exhibit adult common sense and give up, go home, watch some ancient movie, and fall asleep on my futon. The tension those three weeks had built up in me drove me like the mainspring of a mechanical watch, and I went ticking off through nighttown, lubricating my more or less random progress with more drinks. It was one of those nights, I quickly decided, when you slip into an alternate continuum, a city that looks exactly like the one where you live, except for the peculiar difference that it contains not one person you love or know or have even spoken to before.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 150</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;And I know something now. I know that if I hadn’t happened in there, hadn’t seen them, I’d have been able to accept all that came later. Might even have found a way to rejoice on her behalf, or found a way to trust in whatever it is that she’s since become, or had built in her image, a program that pretends to be Lise to the extent that it believes it’s her. I could have believed what Rubin believes, that she was so truly past it, our hi-tech Saint Joan burning for union with that hardwired godhead in Hollywood, that nothing mattered to her except the hour of her departure. That she threw away that poor sad body with a cry of release, free of the bonds of polycarbon and hated flesh. Well, maybe, after all, she did. Maybe it was that way. I’m sure that’s the way she expected it to be.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 152</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The heat was like syrup. The sun drove shadows deep into corners, left them flattened at the feet of the people on the sidewalk. It made the plate glass of the store window into a dark negative of the positive print that was Wornall Road. August.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 155</div></div><h2><em>The Pure Product</em> by <em>John Kessel</em></h2><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;We got into the front seat, beneath the trees on a street at the edge of the park. It was quiet. I reached over, grabbed her hair at the nape of her neck, and jerked her face toward me, covering her little mouth with mine. Surprise: she threw her arms around my neck and slid across the seat into my lap. We did not talk. I yanked at the shorts; she thrust her hand into my pants. St. Augustine asked the Lord for chastity, but not right away.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 157</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;On the Great American Plains, the summer nights are not silent. The fields sing the summer songs of insects – not individual sounds, but a high-pitched drone of locusts, crickets, cicadas, small chirping things for which I have no names. You drive along the superhighway and that sound blends with the sound of wind rushing through your opened windows, hiding the thrum of the automobile, conveying the impression of incredible velocity. Wheels vibrate, tires beat against the pavement, the steering wheel shudders, alive in your hands, droning insects alive in your ears. Reflecting posts at the roadside leap from the darkness with metronomic regularity, glowing amber in the headlights, only to vanish abruptly into the ready night when you pass. You lose track of time, how long you have been on the road, where you are going. The fields scream in your ears like a thousand lost, mechanical souls, and you press your foot to the accelerator, hurrying away.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 158</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;When the videotape started repeating itself I got bored, crossed the street, and lost myself in the crowd.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 170</div></div><p>This story reminds me of the Strugatsky brothers, Octavia Butler, Robert Harris (Hannibal), Robert Silverberg (Up the Line)</p>
<h2><em>Even the Queen</em> by <em>Connie Willis</em></h2><p>A perfectly lovely story about women&rsquo;s liberation from an age-old curse…and the naïve fools who would try to unliberate them.</p>
<h2><em>None So Blind</em> by <em>Joe Haldeman</em></h2><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;When a baritone saxophone player has to transpose sheet music from cello, he (few women are drawn to the instrument) merely pretends that the music is written in treble clef rather than bass, eyeballs it up an octave, and then plays without the octave key pressed down. It’s so simple a child could do it, if a child wanted to play such a huge, ungainly instrument. As his eye dances along the little fence posts of notes his fingers automatically perform a one-to-one transformation that is the theoretical equivalent of adding and subtracting octaves, fifths, and thirds, but all of the actual mental work is done when he looks up in the top right corner of the first page and says, “Aw hell. Cello again.” Cello parts aren’t that interesting to saxophonists.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 271</div></div><h2><em>Mortimer Gray&rsquo;s History of Death</em> by <em>Brian Stableford</em></h2><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;“Planning a life,” I explained to a whole series of faces, indistinguishable by virtue of having been sculptured according to the latest theory of telegenicity, “is an exercise in story-making. Living people are forever writing the narratives of their own lives, deciding who to be and what to do, according to various aesthetic criteria. In olden days, death was inevitably seen as an interruption of the business of life, cutting short life-stories before they were – in the eyes of their creators – complete. Nowadays, people have the opportunity to plan whole lives, deciding exactly when and how their life-stories should reach a climax and a conclusion. We may not share their aesthetic sensibilities, and may well think them fools, but there is a discernible logic in their actions. They are neither mad nor evil.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 297</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;He argued that syphilis was primarily responsible for the rise and spread of Puritanism, repressive sexual morality being the only truly effective weapon against its spread. He then deployed well-tried sociological arguments to the effect that Puritanism and its associated habits of thought had been importantly implicated in the rapid development of Capitalism in the Western World, in order that he might claim that syphilis ought to be regarded as the root cause of the economic and political systems that came to dominate the most chaotic, the most extravagantly progressive, and the most extravagantly destructive centuries of human history.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 299</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Throughout the next two centuries, Gray argued, war and publicity were entwined in a Gordian knot. Control of the news media became vital to propagandist control of popular morale, and governments engaged in war had to become architects of the mythology of war as well as planners of military strategy. Heroism and jingöism became the currency of consent; where governments failed to secure the public image of the wars they fought, they fell.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 303</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Gray dissented from the view of other modern historians who saw the World Wars as an unmitigated disaster and a horrible example of the barbarity of ancient man. He agreed that the nationalism that had replaced the great religions as the main creator and definer of a sense of community was a poor and petty thing, and that the massive conflicts that it engendered were tragic – but it was, he asserted, a necessary stage in historical development. The empires of faith were, when all was said and done, utterly incompetent to their self-defined task, and were always bound to fail and to disintegrate. The groundwork for a genuine human community, in which all mankind could properly and meaningfully join, had to be relaid, and it had to be relaid in the common experience of all nations, as part of a universal heritage.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 304</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Sometimes, I thought of this failure as a result of cowardice, or evidence of the decadence that the fabers and other subspecies attributed to the humans of Earth. I sometimes imagined myself as an insect born at the bottom of a deep cave, who had – thanks to the toil of many preceding generations of insects – been brought to the rim from which I could look out at the great world, but who dared not take the one final step that would carry me out and away.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 308</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;[…] death, Gray insisted, would forever remain a fact of life. The annihilation of the individual human body and the individual human mind could never become impossible, no matter how far biotechnology might advance or how much progress the Cyborganizers might make in downloading minds into entirely new matrices. The victory that had been achieved, he argued, was not an absolute conquest but rather the relegation of death to its proper place in human affairs. Its power was now properly circumscribed, but had to be properly respected.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 319</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;One or two Thanatic apologists and fellow-travelers publicly expressed their hope that Gray, having completed his thesis, would now recognize the aesthetic propriety of joining their ranks. Khan Mirafzal, when asked to relay his opinion back from an outward-bound microworld, opined that this was quite unnecessary, given that Mortimer Gray and all his kind were already immured in a tomb from which they would never be able to escape.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 320</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;[…] remind myself that it is not her fault that the war turned her into an old woman, or that her mind is full of holes and everything new drains out. But it’s not my fault either. I don’t even try to curb my feelings and I know that they rise up to my face. The only way to be true is to be true from the inside and I am not. I am full of unchristian feelings. My mother’s infirmity is her trial, and it is also mine.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 328</div></div><h2><em>Wang&rsquo;s Carpets</em> by <em>Greg Egan</em></h2><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Paolo slowed his clock rate a thousandfold, allowing C-Z to circumnavigate the planet in twenty subjective seconds,&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 341</div></div><p>How do you have relationships when everyone is on their own clock? The problem exists today, with many choosing to live in the absolutely ephemeral, while others wait and see and digest. By the time the second group is ready, the first group doesn&rsquo;t even remember the event anymore.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;In a quarter of a billion years, would the citizens of Carter-Zimmerman be debating the ethics of intervening to rescue the Orpheans – or would they all have lost interest, and departed for other stars, or modified themselves into beings entirely devoid of nostalgic compassion for organic life?&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 344</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Did human consciousness bootstrap all of space-time into existence, in order to explain itself? Or had a neutral, pre-existing universe given birth to a billion varieties of conscious life, all capable of harboring the same delusions of grandeur – until they collided with each other? Anthrocosmology was used to justify the inward-looking stance of most polises: if the physical universe was created by human thought, it had no special status which placed it above virtual reality. It might have come first – and every virtual reality might need to run on a physical computing device, subject to physical laws – but it occupied no privileged position in terms of “truth” versus “illusion.” If the ACs were right, then it was no more honest to value the physical universe over more recent artificial realities than it was honest to remain flesh instead of software, or ape instead of human, or bacterium instead of ape.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 345</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Paolo was relieved to be back to normal; ceremonial regression to the ancestral form was a venerable C-Z tradition – and being human was largely self-affirming, while it lasted – but every time he emerged from the experience, he felt as if he’d broken free of billion-year-old shackles. There were polises on Earth where the citizens would have found his present structure almost as archaic: a consciousness dominated by sensory perception, an illusion of possessing solid form, a single time coordinate.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 346</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Life – embedded in the accidental computations of Wang’s Carpets, with no possibility of ever relating to the world outside. This was an affront to Carter-Zimmerman’s whole philosophy: if nature had evolved “organisms” as divorced from reality as the inhabitants of the most inward-looking polis, where was the privileged status of the physical universe, the clear distinction between truth and illusion?&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 363</div></div><h2><em>The Dead</em> by <em>Michael Swanwick</em></h2><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The slums below me stretched to infinity. They were a vast necropolis, a never-ending city of the dead. I thought of the millions out there who were never going to hold down a job again. I thought of how they must hate me – me and my kind – and how helpless they were before us. And yet. There were so many of them and so few of us. If they were to all rise up at once, they’d be like a tsunami, irresistible. And if there was so much as a spark of life left in them, then that was exactly what they would do. That was one possibility. There was one other, and that was that nothing would happen. Nothing at all.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 392</div></div><h2><em>A Dry, Quiet War</em> by <em>Tony Daniel</em></h2><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;“Soldiers who don’t go home after the war. The fighting gets into them, and they don’t want to give it up, or can’t. Sometimes they have . . . modifications that won’t let them give it up. They wander the timeways – and since they don’t belong to the time they show up in, they’re hard to kill. In the early times, where people don’t know about the war or have only heard rumors of it, they had lots of names. Vampires. Hagamonsters. Zombies.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 409</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;About how there is not enough dark matter to pull the cosmos back together again, not enough mass to undulate in an eternal cycle. Instead, there is an end, and all the stars are either dead or dying, and all that there is is nothing but dim night. I told her about the twilight armies gathered there, culled from all times, all places. Creatures, presences, machines, weapons fighting galaxy-to-galaxy, system-to-system, fighting until the critical point is reached when entropy flows no more, but pools, pools in endless stagnant pools of nothing. No light. No heat. No effect. And the universe is dead, and so those who remain . . . inherit the dark field. They win.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 409</div></div><h2><em>Story of Your Life</em> by <em>Ted Chiang</em></h2><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;just mean that the human auditory system isn’t an absolute acoustic instrument; it’s optimized to recognize the sounds that a human larynx makes. With an alien vocal system, all bets are off.” I shrugged. “Maybe we’ll be able to hear the difference between alien phonemes, given enough practice, but it’s possible our ears simply can’t recognize the distinctions they consider meaningful. In that case we’d need a sound spectrograph to know what an alien is saying.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 468</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;And after graduation, you’ll be heading for a job as a financial analyst. I won’t understand what you do there, I won’t even understand your fascination with money, the preeminence you gave to salary when negotiating job offers. I would prefer it if you’d pursue something without regard for its monetary rewards, but I’ll have no complaints. My own mother could never understand why I couldn’t just be a high school English teacher. You’ll do what makes you happy, and that’ll be all I ask for.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 481</div></div><p>Barf. Isn&rsquo;t this part of the problem?</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;the physical attributes that the heptapods found intuitive, like “action” or those other things defined by integrals, were meaningful only over a period of time. And these were conducive to a teleological interpretation of events: by viewing events over a period of time, one recognized that there was a requirement that had to be satisfied, a goal of minimizing or maximizing. And one had to know the initial and final states to meet that goal; one needed knowledge of the effects before the causes could be initiated.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 493</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Consider the phenomenon of light hitting water at one angle, and traveling through it at a different angle. Explain it by saying that a difference in the index of refraction caused the light to change direction, and one saw the world as humans saw it. Explain it by saying that light minimized the time needed to travel to its destination, and one saw the world as the heptapods saw it. Two very different interpretations. The physical universe was a language with a perfectly ambiguous grammar. Every physical event was an utterance that could be parsed in two entirely different ways, one causal and the other teleological, both valid, neither one disqualifiable no matter how much context was available.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 495</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;For the heptapods, all language was performative. Instead of using language to inform, they used language to actualize. Sure, heptapods already knew what would be said in any conversation; but in order for their knowledge to be true, the conversation would have to take place.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 498</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;suddenly remembered that a morphological relative of “performative” was “performance,” which could describe the sensation of conversing when you knew what would be said: it was like performing in a play.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 499</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Like physical events, with their causal and teleological interpretations, every linguistic event had two possible interpretations: as a transmission of information and as the realization of a plan.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 500</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Before I learned how to think in Heptapod B, my memories grew like a column of cigarette ash, laid down by the infinitesimal sliver of combustion that was my consciousness, marking the sequential present.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 500</div></div><h2><em>People came from Earth</em> by <em>Stephen Baxter</em></h2><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;But Berge wasn’t listening. He turned away, to look again at the bloated sun. “All this will pass,” he said. “The sun will die. The universe may collapse on itself, or spread to a cold infinity. In either case it may be possible to build a giant machine that will recreate this universe – everything, every detail of this moment – so that we will all live again. But how can we know if this is the first time? Perhaps the universe has already died, many times, to be born again. Perhaps Leonardo was no traveler. Perhaps he was simply remembering.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 513</div></div><h2><em>The Real World</em> by <em>Stephen Utley</em></h2><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;“Now let’s say someone from our present-day visits a prehistoric Earth and returns. After a while, after the initial excitement’s died down, he starts to ponder the implications of travel back and forth between multiple Earths. He’s come back to a present-day Earth that may or may not be his own present-day Earth. If it’s virtually identical, well, if the only difference is, say, the outcome of some subatomic occurrence, then it doesn’t matter. But maybe there’s something subtly off on the macro level. It wouldn’t be anything major. Napoleon, Hitler, and the Confederate States would all’ve gone down to defeat. Or maybe the time-traveler only suspects that something may be subtly off. His problem is, he’s never quite sure, he can’t decide whether something is off or he only thinks it is, so he’s always looking for the telling detail. But there are so many details. If he never knew in the first place how many plays Shakespeare really wrote or who all those European kings were . . .”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 618</div></div><h2><em>Lobsters</em> by <em>Charles Stross</em></h2><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;“Nyet – no, sorry. Am apologize for we not use commercial translation software. Interpreters are ideologically suspect, mostly have capitalist semiotics and pay-per-use APIs. Must implement English more better, yes?”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 640</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;He slips his glasses on, takes the universe off hold, and tells it to take him for a long walk while he catches up on the latest on the cosmic background radiation anisotropy (which it is theorized may be waste heat generated by irreversible computations; according to the more conservative cosmologists, an alien superpower – maybe a collective of Kardashev type three galaxy-spanning civilizations – is running a timing channel attack on the computational ultrastructure of spacetime itself, trying to break through to whatever’s underneath).&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 651</div></div><h2><em>Breathmoss</em> by <em>Ian R. MacLeod</em></h2><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;“This ant, Jalila, which crawls across this sheet of paper from here to there. She is much like us as we crawl across the surface of this planet. Even if she had the wings some of her kind sprout, just as I have my caleche, it would still be the same.” The tiny creature, waving feelers, was plainly lost. A black dot. Jalila understood how it felt. “But say, if we were to fold both sides of the paper together. You see how she moves now. . . ?” The ant, antennae waving, hesitant, at last made the tiny jump. “We can move more quickly from one place to another by not traveling across the distance that separates us from it, but by folding space itself. “Imagine now, Jalila, that this universe is not one thing alone, one solitary series of this following that, but an endless branching of potentialities. Such it has been since the Days of Creation, and such it is even now, in the shuffle of that leaf as the wind picks at it, in the rising steam of your coffee. Every moment goes in many ways. Most are poor, half-formed things, the passing thoughts and whims of the Almighty. They hang there and they die, never to be seen again. But others branch as strongly as this path that we find ourselves following. There are universes where you and I have never sat here in this qasr. There are universes where there is no Jalila. . . . Will you get that for me. . . ?” The tariqua was pointing to an old book in a far corner. Its leather was cracked, the wind lifted its pages. As she took it from her, Jalila felt the hot brush of the old woman’s hand. “So now, you must imagine that there is not just one sheet of a single universe, but many, as in this book, heaped invisibly above and beside and below the page upon which we find ourselves crawling. In fact . . .” The ant recoiled briefly, sensing the strange heat of the tariqua’s fingers, then settled on the open pages. “You must imagine shelf after shelf, floor upon floor of books, the aisles of an infinite library. And if we are to fold this one page, you see, we or the ant never quite knows what lies on the other side of it. And there may be a tear in that next page as well. It may even be that another version of ourselves has already torn it.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 696</div></div><h2><em>Zima Blue</em> by <em>Alistair Reynolds</em></h2><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;“There’s always been something about blue. A thousand years ago Yves Klein said it was the essence of colour itself: the colour that stood for all other colours. A man once spent his entire life searching for a particular shade of blue that he remembered encountering in childhood. He began to despair of ever finding it, thinking he must have imagined that precise shade, that it could not possibly exist in nature. Then one day he chanced upon it. It was the colour of a beetle in a museum of natural history. He wept for joy.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 772</div></div>      </div>
      </div>
        <div class="footer">
    <div class="footer-data"><div class="footer-links"><ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/contact.php" title="">Contact</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/support.php" title="">Support</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/privacy.php" title="">Privacy</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/rights.php" title="">Rights</a></li></ul></div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="copyright">Copyright (c) 1999-2026 earthli.com. All Rights Reserved.</div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="versions">Powered by <ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore/app_news.php">earthli News 3.7</a></li><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore" title="">earthli WebCore&trade; 3.7</a></li></ul></div></div>    </div>
      </div>
  </div>  </body>
</html>
]]>
  </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
      <title type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[The Fifth Season (The Broken Earth Book 1) by N.K. Jemisin (2015) (read in 2017)]]>
  </title>
    <id>https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3455</id>
    <link href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3455"/>
    <updated>2017-12-03T22:31:56+01:00</updated>
    <author>
        <name type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[Marco von Ballmoos]]>
  </name>
      <uri>https://earthli.com/users/marco</uri>
    </author>
      <summary type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<blockquote class="quote abstract "><div>Disclaimer: these are notes I took while reading this book. They include citations I found interesting or enlightening or particularly well-written. In some cases, I&rsquo;ve pointed out which of these applies to which citation; in others, I have not. Any benefit you gain from reading these notes is... [<a class="complete-text-link" href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3455">More</a>]</div></blockquote>]]>
  </summary>
      <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<html lang="en">
  <head>
    <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/themes/ice.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/fonts/raleway.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/core/medium.css">
  </head>
  <body>
<div class="style-controls">  <div class="page">
    <div class="page-body">
<div class="info-box-top">
<p>
Published by <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_user.php?name=marco" title="Marco von Ballmoos" class="visible">marco</a> on <span class="date-time">3. Dec 2017 22:31:56 (GMT-5)</span>
</p>
</div>
      <div class="text-flow wide">
  <blockquote class="quote abstract "><div>Disclaimer: these are notes I took while reading this book. They include citations I found interesting or enlightening or particularly well-written. In some cases, I&rsquo;ve pointed out which of these applies to which citation; in others, I have not. Any benefit you gain from reading these notes is purely incidental to the purpose they serve of reminding me what I once read. Please see Wikipedia for a summary if I&rsquo;ve failed to provide one sufficient for your purposes. If my notes serve to trigger an interest in this book, then I&rsquo;m happy for you.</div></blockquote><p>This is a very good book. It took me about a 100 pages to get into it, to get used to the storytelling rhythms of the author, to the at-times deliberate obfuscation and confusion. I feel that it took Jemisin that long to get into it as well, because the storytelling felt much more fluid in the later 70% of the book than in the first 30%. It is entirely possible that this is purely my fault, I&rsquo;ll admit. I&rsquo;m not getting any less-set in my ways. I just offer it as a warning to those who may be similarly put-off by the storytelling style—stick with it; it&rsquo;s worth it.</p>
<p>This is the story of an alternate Earth—one we learn follows our own auspicious, but ultimately doomed age—on which &ldquo;Father Earth&rdquo; plays a much-more active and vicious role, through extreme geologic events. Humans have split into distinct species, with distinct powers. The primary focus of this book is on the orogenes—humans who can draw power from any source, but primarily use the immense powers of the Earth itself. There is an arcane hierarchy amongst them. The least of them can manipulate the earth, but with no fine control. The most advanced of them can control molecules and draw immense power from disparate sources.</p>
<p>There is so much going on in this book: The Guardians, the Fulcrum, the Leadership class, the Orogenes, the Geomesters, the Stone-eaters, Alabaster&rsquo;s power and history and rebelliousness, Syenites power and connection to the floating obelisks, supposed relics of long-dead and failed human civilizations that followed the loss of Father Earth&rsquo;s &ldquo;child&rdquo;. These relics litter the planet in innumerable number, each serving as the tombstone of a civilization that failed to prepare properly for the often-long Fifth Seasons—sometime decades-long intermezzos initiated by cataclysmic geologic events.</p>
<p>The book is ostensibly about Syenite but is split between three tales, each of which tells of another facet of her life, though this doesn&rsquo;t become clear until late in the book (a feature that requires trust on the part of the reader—a trust Jemisin is ultimately a worthy of). It felt a bit derivative at first, but then I realized that it was following in the lines of other books and series that I&rsquo;ve really liked (e.g. Potter, Dune, Song of Ice and Fire) and that it was mixing these concepts in its own unique and well-written way. It&rsquo;s a rollicking tale—at times almost too quick-moving, cramming in so much at once, but somehow suitably controlled—and I&rsquo;m looking forward to book two.</p>
<h2>Citations</h2><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;[…] they will kill her career and assign her permanently to the Fulcrum, leaving her nothing to do but lie on her back and turn men’s grunting and farting into babies. She’ll be lucky to have only six if that’s how things turn out.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 71</div></div><p>This is kind of writing found more at the beginning of the book, which smacks you in the face with modern American youth politics and is a bit jarring. When I read this, I wrote <span class="quote-inline">&ldquo;Men are useless. as are the old. This does not bode well.&rdquo;</span> I kept reading and was rewarded as my ability to Jemisin settled into her storytelling and my tolerance increased.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Nothing to do but follow your crazy, though. You’ve eaten something from your pack: cachebread smeared with salty akaba paste from the jar&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 79</div></div><p>Here, too, I was thrown out of the story with the hyper-modern colloquialism from our time (<span class="quote-inline">&ldquo;follow your crazy&rdquo;</span>) mixed with arcana from the world Jemisin is weaving. The subsequent 500 pages show that these lapses are rarities where the author&rsquo;s voice intrudes. The device of the second person was odd, at first (as it nearly always is), but there was a method to the madness if you stick with the book.</p>
<p>At 100 pages in, I was seeing too much of other books I&rsquo;d read. This one felt a bit like a &ldquo;throw in everything but the kitchen sink&rdquo; plot, with bits of Harry Potter, Game of Thrones, Dune, Fifty Shades (Schaffa, the Guardian&rsquo;s torture—which also ended up having its point, in the end, but felt wildly out-of-place when introduced) and a smattering of SJW YA books I&rsquo;ve never read. Still, several of those tomes are quite good, so I continued, hoping for the best (and being rewarded).</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>"I didn’t know.” She slurs the words around the back of her hand. The words don’t make sense but she feels compelled to say them. “I didn’t.” </p>
<p>“You think that matters?” It’s almost cruel, the emotionlessness of his voice and face.</p>
<p>“It matters to me!”</p>
<p>“You think you matter?” All at once he smiles. It’s an ugly thing, cold as the vapor that curls off ice. “You think any of us matter beyond what we can do for them? Whether we obey or not.” He jerks his head toward the body of the abused, murdered child. “You think he mattered, after what they did to him? The only reason they don’t do this to all of us is because we’re more versatile, more useful, if we control ourselves. But each of us is just another weapon, to them. Just a useful monster, just a bit of new blood to add to the breeding lines. Just another fucking rogga.” She has never heard so much hate put into one word before.</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 143</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>Asael actually flinches as the analogies finally get through to her. Syenite waits in silence, letting it gather pressure. Finally Asael says, “I see.”</p>
<p>“Maybe you do.”</p>
<p>She keeps waiting, and Asael sighs. “What do you want? An apology? Then I apologize. You must remember, though, that most normal people have never seen an orogene, let alone had to do business with one, and—” She spreads her hands. “Isn’t it understandable that we might be… uncomfortable?”</p>
<p>“Discomfort is understandable. It’s the rudeness that isn’t.” Rust this. This woman doesn’t deserve the effort of her explanation. Syen decides to save that for someone who matters. “And that’s a really shitty apology. ‘I’m sorry you’re so abnormal that I can’t manage to treat you like a human being.’”</p>
<p>“You’re a rogga,” Asael snaps, and then has the gall to look surprised at herself.</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 216</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Syenite flinches, suddenly remembering the dead child in the node station near Mehi. Oh. The Fulcrum controls all the node maintainers. What if they have some way to force those poor damaged children to listen, and to spit back what they listen to, like some kind of living telegraph receivers? Is that what he fears? Is the Fulcrum like a spider, perching in Yumenes’s heart and using the web of nodes to listen in on every conversation in the Stillness?&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 254</div></div><p>This part reminds me of Dune. The citations from millennia-old books at the ends of the chapters are very much like Dune, as well.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;She is aware of Alabaster, twitching because he is convulsing, how did she not realize this before, he is not in control of his own body, there is something about the glassknife in his shoulder that has rendered him helpless for all his power, and the look on his face is of helpless fear and agony.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 261</div></div><p>This was a bit of a quick transition that seemed a bit of a crude way to manipulate the reader. Alabaster went from most powerful orogene ever to utterly helpless in seconds. This whipsaw is a little annoying. making me feel like I&rsquo;m just along for the ride, unable to comprehend or predict anything about this world. It&rsquo;s kind of like reading comic books these days: everyone&rsquo;s a genius/billionaire/most-power-in-the-universe hero … until they&rsquo;re not. And it&rsquo;s impossible to tell what will fell a hero. It feels cheaper than it needed to be—there could have been more of a struggle. The Guardians and the Stone-Eaters function too much as <em>Deux Ex Machinae</em> for my taste. They need to be a bit more fallible, too, otherwise it&rsquo;s poor game balance.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;(Friends do not exist. The Fulcrum is not a school. Grits are not children. Orogenes are not people. Weapons have no need of friends.)&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 297</div></div><p>The analogies to our world are clear: Stonelore is propaganda. Roggas are niggas. Sanze is the U.U. The islands are free nations, struggling to escape its yoke and influence.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;There passes a time of happiness in your life, which I will not describe to you. It is unimportant. Perhaps you think it wrong that I dwell so much on the horrors, the pain, but pain is what shapes us, after all.</p>
<p>&ldquo;We are creatures born of heat and pressure and grinding, ceaseless movement. To be still is to be… not alive. But what is important is that you know it was not all terrible.</p>
<p>&ldquo;There was peace in long stretches, between each crisis. A chance to cool and solidify before the grind resumed. Here is what you need to understand. In any war, there are factions: those wanting peace, those wanting more war for a myriad of reasons, and those whose desires transcend either. And this is a war with many sides, not just two. Did you think it was just the stills and the orogenes? No, no. Remember the stone eaters and the Guardians, too—oh, and the Seasons. Never forget Father Earth. He has not forgotten you.&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 361</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>You don’t want to understand, but you do. You don’t want to believe, but really, you have all along.</p>
<p>“You tore that rift up north,” you breathe. Your hands are clenching into fists. “You split the continent. You started this Season. With the obelisks! You did… all of that.”</p>
<p>“Yes, with the obelisks, and with the aid of the node maintainers. They’re all at peace now.” He exhales, wheezily. “I need your help.”</p>
<p>You shake your head automatically, but not in refusal. “To fix it?”</p>
<p>“Oh, no, Syen.”</p>
<p>You don’t even bother to correct him this time. You can’t take your eyes from his amused, nearly skeletal face. When he speaks, you notice that some of his teeth have turned to stone, too. How many of his organs have done the same? How much longer can he—should he—live like this?</p>
<p>“I don’t want you to fix it,” Alabaster says. “It was collateral damage, but Yumenes got what it deserved. No, what I want you to do, my Damaya, my Syenite, my Essun, is make it worse.”</p>
<p>You stare at him, speechless. Then he leans forward. That this is painful for him is obvious; you hear the creak and stretch of his flesh, and a faint crack as some piece of stone somewhere on him fissures. But when he is close enough, he grins again, and suddenly it hits you. Evil, eating, Earth. He’s not crazy at all, and he never has been.</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 448</div></div>      </div>
      </div>
        <div class="footer">
    <div class="footer-data"><div class="footer-links"><ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/contact.php" title="">Contact</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/support.php" title="">Support</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/privacy.php" title="">Privacy</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/rights.php" title="">Rights</a></li></ul></div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="copyright">Copyright (c) 1999-2026 earthli.com. All Rights Reserved.</div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="versions">Powered by <ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore/app_news.php">earthli News 3.7</a></li><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore" title="">earthli WebCore&trade; 3.7</a></li></ul></div></div>    </div>
      </div>
  </div>  </body>
</html>
]]>
  </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
      <title type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[In Cold Blood by Truman Capote (1966) (read in 2017)]]>
  </title>
    <id>https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3452</id>
    <link href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3452"/>
    <updated>2017-12-03T22:30:49+01:00</updated>
    <author>
        <name type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[Marco von Ballmoos]]>
  </name>
      <uri>https://earthli.com/users/marco</uri>
    </author>
      <summary type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<blockquote class="quote abstract "><div>Disclaimer: these are notes I took while reading this book. They include citations I found interesting or enlightening or particularly well-written. In some cases, I&rsquo;ve pointed out which of these applies to which citation; in others, I have not. Any benefit you gain from reading these notes is... [<a class="complete-text-link" href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3452">More</a>]</div></blockquote>]]>
  </summary>
      <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<html lang="en">
  <head>
    <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/themes/ice.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/fonts/raleway.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/core/medium.css">
  </head>
  <body>
<div class="style-controls">  <div class="page">
    <div class="page-body">
<div class="info-box-top">
<p>
Published by <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_user.php?name=marco" title="Marco von Ballmoos" class="visible">marco</a> on <span class="date-time">3. Dec 2017 22:30:49 (GMT-5)</span>
</p>
</div>
      <div class="text-flow wide">
  <blockquote class="quote abstract "><div>Disclaimer: these are notes I took while reading this book. They include citations I found interesting or enlightening or particularly well-written. In some cases, I&rsquo;ve pointed out which of these applies to which citation; in others, I have not. Any benefit you gain from reading these notes is purely incidental to the purpose they serve of reminding me what I once read. Please see Wikipedia for a summary if I&rsquo;ve failed to provide one sufficient for your purposes. If my notes serve to trigger an interest in this book, then I&rsquo;m happy for you.</div></blockquote><p>This is the story of a brutal multiple-murder in Kansas in the late 1950s. Truman Capote puts together an exquisitely researched and well-told tale. It is a masterful exemplar of historical fiction, in that the facts are clearly represented, but they are decorated with fictive imagining of conversations that add a lot of flavor without distracting from the story or making it feel fake. In particular, a lot of the book involves the interaction between the two perpetrators before, during and after the murders—something that Capote could only have gleaned from interviews and notes, but that he writes <em>as if he&rsquo;d been there</em>. Expertly and nigh-poetically written. Highly recommended.</p>
<h2>Citations</h2><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Except for taking off his boots, he had not troubled to undress. He had merely fallen face down across the bed, as though sleep were a weapon that had struck him from behind.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 73</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>"There is much resentment in this community [that is, Garden City],” wrote Mr. Fox. “I have even heard on more than one occasion that the man, when found, should be hanged from the nearest tree. Let us not feel this way. The deed is done and taking another life cannot change it. Instead, let us forgive as God would have us do. It is not right that we should hold a grudge in our hearts. The doer of this act is going to find it very difficult indeed to live with himself. His only peace of mind will be when he goes to God for forgiveness. Let us not stand in the way but instead give prayers that he may find his peace.&ldquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 107</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>The car was moving. A hundred feet ahead, a dog trotted along the side of the road. Dick swerved toward it. It was an old half-dead mongrel, brittle-boned and mangy, and the impact, as it met the car, was little more than what a bird might make. But Dick was satisfied. “Boy!” he said—and it was what he always said after running down a dog, which was something he did whenever the opportunity arose. “Boy! We sure splattered him!&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 112</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>And yet it was true that the farm nowadays made him uneasy: the locked house, Nancy’s horse forlornly waiting in a field, the odor of windfall apples rotting under the apple trees, and the absence of voices—Kenyon calling Nancy to the telephone, Herb whistling, his glad “Good morning, Paul.”</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 121</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;[…] for he had lost his mother as well, learned to “despise” her; liquor had blurred the face, swollen the figure of the once sinewy, limber Cherokee girl, had “soured her soul,” honed her tongue to the wickedest point, so dissolved her self-respect that generally she did not bother to ask the names of the stevedores and trolley-car conductors and such persons who accepted what she offered without charge (except that she insisted they drink with her first, and dance to the tunes of a wind-up Victrola).&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 131</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;(Sample page: “Thanatoid = deathlike; Omnilingual = versed in languages; Amerce = punishment, amount fixed by court; Nescient = ignorance; Facinorous = atrociously wicked; Hagiophobia = a morbid fear of holy places &amp; things; Lapidicolous = living under stones, as certain blind beetles; Dyspathy = lack of sympathy, fellow feeling; Psilopher = a fellow who fain would pass as a philosopher; Omophagia = eating raw flesh, the rite of some savage tribes; Depredate = to pillage, rob, and prey upon; Aphrodisiac = a drug or the like which excites sexual desire; Megalodactylous = having abnormally large fingers; Myrtophobia = fear of night and darkness.”)&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 146</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Dewey’s ears ring with it—a ringing that almost deafens him to the whispery rush of Smith’s soft voice. But the voice plunges on, ejecting a fusillade of sounds and images: Hickock hunting the discharged shell; hurrying, hurrying, and Kenyon’s head in a circle of light, the murmur of muffled pleadings, then Hickock again scrambling after a used cartridge; Nancy’s room, Nancy listening to boots on hardwood stairs, the creak of the steps as they climb toward her, Nancy’s eyes, Nancy watching the flashlight’s shine seek the target (“She said, ‘Oh, no! Oh, please. No! No! No! No! Don’t! Oh, please don’t! Please!’ I gave the gun to Dick. I told him I’d done all I could do. He took aim, and she turned her face to the wall”); the dark hall, the assassins hastening toward the final door. Perhaps, having heard all she had, Bonnie welcomed their swift approach.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 244</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;He scowled, as though the problem was new to him, a newly unearthed stone of surprising, unclassified color. “I don’t know why,” he said, as if holding it to the light, and angling it now here, now there.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 290</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>Perry said, “Am I sorry? If that’s what you mean—I’m not. I don’t feel anything about it. I wish I did. But nothing about it bothers me a bit. Half an hour after it happened, Dick was making jokes and I was laughing at them. Maybe we’re not human. I’m human enough to feel sorry for myself. Sorry I can’t walk out of here when you walk out. But that’s all.”</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 290</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>When such senseless murders occur, they are seen to be an end result of a period of increasing tension and disorganization in the murderer starting before the contact with the victim who, by fitting into the unconscious conflicts of the murderer, unwittingly serves to set into motion his homicidal potential.”</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 301</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;But it is Dr. Satten’s contention that only the first murder matters psychologically, and that when Smith attacked Mr. Clutter he was under a mental eclipse, deep inside a schizophrenic darkness, for it was not entirely a flesh-and-blood man he “suddenly discovered” himself destroying, but “a key figure in some past traumatic configuration”: his father? the orphanage nuns who had derided and beaten him? the hated Army sergeant? the parole officer who had ordered him to “stay out of Kansas”? One of them, or all of them.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 302</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;It is a relic of human barbarism. The law tells us that the taking of human life is wrong, then goes ahead and sets the example. Which is almost as wicked as the crime it punished. The state has no right to inflict it. It isn’t effective. It doesn’t deter crime, but merely cheapens human life and gives rise to more murders. All we ask is mercy. Surely life imprisonment is small mercy to ask.…&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 303</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;In Exodus Twenty, Verse Thirteen, we have one of the Ten Commandments: ‘Thou shalt not kill.’ This refers to unlawful killing. Of course it does, because in the next chapter, Verse Twelve, the penalty for disobedience of that Commandment reads: ‘He that smiteth a man, so that he die, shall be surely put to death.’&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 304</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The bad part was saying goodbye. When you knew where he was going, and what would happen to him. That squirrel of his, he sure misses Perry. Keeps coming to the cell looking for him. I’ve tried to feed him, but he won’t have anything to do with me. It was just Perry he liked.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 308</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The question is this—do poor, plainly guilty defendants have a right to a complete defense? I do not believe that the State of Kansas would be either greatly or for long harmed by the death of these appellants. But I do not believe it could ever recover from the death of due process.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 326</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;But for someone his age he was the smartest person I ever come across. A human library. When that boy read a book it stayed read.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 333</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>“They don’t feel nothing. Drop, snap, and that’s it. They don’t feel nothing.” “Are you sure? I was standing right close. I could hear him gasping for breath.” “Uh-huh, but he don’t feel nothing. Wouldn’t be humane if he did.” “Well. And I suppose they feed them a lot of pills. Sedatives.” “Hell, no. Against the rules.&ldquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 340</div></div>      </div>
      </div>
        <div class="footer">
    <div class="footer-data"><div class="footer-links"><ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/contact.php" title="">Contact</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/support.php" title="">Support</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/privacy.php" title="">Privacy</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/rights.php" title="">Rights</a></li></ul></div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="copyright">Copyright (c) 1999-2026 earthli.com. All Rights Reserved.</div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="versions">Powered by <ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore/app_news.php">earthli News 3.7</a></li><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore" title="">earthli WebCore&trade; 3.7</a></li></ul></div></div>    </div>
      </div>
  </div>  </body>
</html>
]]>
  </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
      <title type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[The Making of Donald Trump by David Cay Johnston (2016) (read in 2017)]]>
  </title>
    <id>https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3450</id>
    <link href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3450"/>
    <updated>2017-10-08T20:48:56+02:00</updated>
    <author>
        <name type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[Marco von Ballmoos]]>
  </name>
      <uri>https://earthli.com/users/marco</uri>
    </author>
      <summary type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<blockquote class="quote abstract "><div>Disclaimer: these are notes I took while reading this book. They include citations I found interesting or enlightening or particularly well-written. In some cases, I&rsquo;ve pointed out which of these applies to which citation; in others, I have not. Any benefit you gain from reading these notes is... [<a class="complete-text-link" href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3450">More</a>]</div></blockquote>]]>
  </summary>
      <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<html lang="en">
  <head>
    <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/themes/ice.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/fonts/raleway.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/core/medium.css">
  </head>
  <body>
<div class="style-controls">  <div class="page">
    <div class="page-body">
<div class="info-box-top">
<p>
Published by <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_user.php?name=marco" title="Marco von Ballmoos" class="visible">marco</a> on <span class="date-time">8. Oct 2017 20:48:56 (GMT-5)</span>
</p>
</div>
      <div class="text-flow wide">
  <blockquote class="quote abstract "><div>Disclaimer: these are notes I took while reading this book. They include citations I found interesting or enlightening or particularly well-written. In some cases, I&rsquo;ve pointed out which of these applies to which citation; in others, I have not. Any benefit you gain from reading these notes is purely incidental to the purpose they serve of reminding me what I once read. Please see Wikipedia for a summary if I&rsquo;ve failed to provide one sufficient for your purposes. If my notes serve to trigger an interest in this book, then I&rsquo;m happy for you.</div></blockquote><p>Johnston writes a book that outlines several of Trump&rsquo;s failed real-estate–development plans. But he, at the same time, documents how people were trying to sue Trump because they invested in him because of his good name only to find out that Trump is only tangentially involved with their real-estate investment. Are these people just stupid to think that Trump would be good for their property? Reading this book, there would be no other conclusion, since you don&rsquo;t hear about a single successful thing that Trump has done. He seems to somehow own property all over the world, but none of it belongs to him and he&rsquo;s only ever ripped off, failed or otherwise disappointed every investor who&rsquo;s ever associated with him.</p>
<p>However, people still think his name is worth investing in, Companies pay him millions to use his name on their projects, even if he&rsquo;s not involved. There must be a reason for this, but Johnston&rsquo;s book does not provide it. Either everyone is an <em>utter and irredeemable moron</em> or Trump must have some successes to his name. There must be some—even a majority of—investors who&rsquo;ve walked away satisfied, probably even coming back for more.</p>
<p>Many of the investors in his get-rich-quick schemes kind of seem like people who are getting what&rsquo;s coming to them. They want to get rich, so they sink all of their money into a single opportunity with Trump. The man must have something going for him, or these people wouldn&rsquo;t do that. Trump inflates his own story and ego all the time, nearly constantly turning the conversation to himself (as Johnston documents). He is a germophobe with poor social skills (as Johnston also documents). And yet, people invest their entire fortune with him. </p>
<p>Johnston is clearly only telling part of the story. He&rsquo;s telling the part of the story where we shouldn&rsquo;t vote for this man as President, where we shouldn&rsquo;t do deals with him, shouldn&rsquo;t invest money with him or go anywhere near him, where we shouldn&rsquo;t ever pay attention to him again. Agreed. I&rsquo;d been doing that already, before I read this biography.</p>
<p>However, the story Johnston tells is of sealed court decisions, suspicious and quite facially reprehensible behavior, but never a conviction. Trump&rsquo;s had his casino license for decades but Johnston seems to attribute it to luck. Trump&rsquo;s run multiple casinos for decades (even having the most successful casino in Atlantic City, according to Johnston) but he doesn&rsquo;t know anything about the business and everyone makes fun of how stupid he is.</p>
<p>Trump is a bad businessman and a more terrible person, but everyone seems to be on Trump&rsquo;s side, helping him out. Why? The story Johnston tells is of a person who is horrible, stupid and financially inept, who hangs out with obvious criminals, but who succeeds despite all of that. He can&rsquo;t seem to fail enough to stop being a billionaire.</p>
<p>It&rsquo;s hard to feel sorry for some of his &ldquo;investors&rdquo;. Whenever a story ends with someone having signed without reading because of time pressure…I kind of get distracted. I know that old people get entrapped in stuff like this.</p>
<p>In those cases, the charge is always of some information that Trump and his associates or partners failed to disclose properly. I&rsquo;m almost sure it was disclosed somewhere—it was just that people didn&rsquo;t read it in their eagerness to cash in. Otherwise, why would the court not nail Trump to the wall if it was so open-and-shut?</p>
<p>But why no prosecution? Is it because Trump—the bumbling, asocial fool—is so slick? Or because America&rsquo;s system is so morally bankrupt? In a place like America, don&rsquo;t sign anything without reading it. It&rsquo;s your own fault if you&rsquo;re trying to get rich quick.</p>
<p>The fact that these cases ended in a settlement with no criminal charges or sentence suggests to me that there&rsquo;s more to the story again. It&rsquo;s possible that such malfeasance is nearly impossible to prove in America, or that Trump really knows everyone and buys off judges and DAs—but that&rsquo;s a much bigger charge. Instead, we&rsquo;re expected to believe that he just gets away with it because &ldquo;reasons&rdquo;. No charges or sentence—but we know he did it.</p>
<p>Trump gets away with everything short of murder, associating with terrible people and having a very suspicious business. But he&rsquo;s still going. He&rsquo;s still in business. He&rsquo;s now President of the USA. The story Johnston tells goes nowhere in explaining how this could be. He just deepens the mystery.</p>
<p>Trump says many things that are not true. Are they lies we should care about? Or did he change his mind? Or does he just not care what the answer is to a question he feels he shouldn&rsquo;t have to answer from someone who he feels doesn&rsquo;t have the right to ask it? Trump is an egomaniac, of course. He&rsquo;s a liar, of course. But, as a private citizen, he has no obligation to answer a journalist&rsquo;s question truthfully, especially when it concerns his near-future whereabouts or his personal affairs.</p>
<p>It is here that, again, I feel Johnston is really reaching for straws, trying to paint every nugget of data he has on Trump as not only negative (and that it most certainly is and probably fairly) but <em>damning</em>. I think it unfortunately weakens his case because he&rsquo;s taken the shotgun approach, with topics of wildly varying import. The ones that sound important peter out into no prosecution (and hence possibly speculation) and the ones that don&rsquo;t sound important then just seem petty and cheap.</p>
<p>He expects us to conclude that where there&rsquo;s smoke, there&rsquo;s fire, despite <em>decades</em> of smoke without ever having proof of fire. His evidence is persuasive, but I&rsquo;m not a judge or a lawyer. I&rsquo;m not in charge of prosecuting Trump: dozens of judges have had that pleasure. None of them have put him away. He&rsquo;s still going. </p>
<p>A true believer would round up each allegation to a conviction, but thats not how our system works.</p>
<p>Johnston seems to vaguely imply some sort of angel on Trump&rsquo;s shoulder, but it&rsquo;s more of a condemnation of the American system as a whole that Johnston isn&rsquo;t willing to come right out and make. The system is corrupt from top to bottom and a creature like Trump is perfectly suited to swim in those fetid waters. Johnston seems to be desperately trying to show how obvious it is that Trump shouldn&rsquo;t be a winner in a sane society. He makes a good case. The fact that Trump is winning more than ever suggest a whole other book that needs to be written—this one about America.</p>
<h2>Citations</h2><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Trump, who presents himself as a modern Midas even when much of what he touches turns to dross, has studied the conventions of journalists and displays more genius at exploiting them to his advantage than anyone else I have ever known.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 95-97</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;He was accepted into a Catholic school in New York City, Fordham College, but in his junior year transferred to an Ivy League school, the University of Pennsylvania in Philadelphia. Penn has a famous and highly regarded graduate business school that Trump often invokes. He did not in fact study there. He was enrolled as an undergraduate and received a bachelor of science in economics.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 304-307</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The bank loaned Trump $2 million more than the purchase price, a total of $10 million, on his personal guarantee. Trump put up only $2,800 cash. He boasted that he got Mar-a-Lago for a song, a bargain that showed his extraordinary negotiating skills.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 1073-1075</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Five years after Trump acquired Mar-a-Lago with the unrecorded mortgage, casino regulatory hearings revealed that he had personally guaranteed more than a fourth of his more than $3 billion of debt. Many banks complained that they were unaware other banks had loaned money to Trump on his personal guarantee with no public record of the obligation.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 1080-1082</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;More than one thousand lawyers working for Trump and his creditors had hammered out a “fragile” deal to keep him going, hoping to minimize losses on the loans they had extended without checking his finances carefully. The lawyers had already billed almost $11 million for their services. Part of the deal was&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 1155-1157</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The DGE prepared its own 111-page report. It noted that Trump owed (not owned, but owed) $3.2 billion. Of that, he had personally guaranteed $833.5 million. Absent an agreement by all creditors, Trump would face an uncontrolled, domino-effect chain of bankruptcies. If just one creditor moved against one Trump property, the others would follow, creating chaos. More than one thousand lawyers working for Trump and his creditors had hammered out a “fragile” deal to keep him going, hoping to minimize losses on the loans they had extended without checking his finances carefully. The lawyers had already billed almost $11 million for their services. Part of the deal was putting Trump on an allowance. He would have to get by on $450,000 per month, down from his May 1990 spending of $583,000 (the equivalent of more than one million 2016 dollars). The allowance was so astonishingly large that The New York Times quoted one billionaire as saying, “I would have no idea how to spend $450,000 a month. It’s just phenomenal.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 1152-1160</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The tax bill is not wiped out, however. Under the rules set by Congress, the tax is deferred into the future. The $23 million is therefore the economic equivalent of a loan from Uncle Sam at zero interest. Someday, that loan must be paid off. Typically, real estate partnerships last two decades, so let’s assume that Trump invests those loan proceeds for twenty years and earns an annual net return of 10 percent (a return that Trump would consider modest and below his skill level as an investor). When time came to repay his loan, Trump would write the Treasury a check for the almost $23 million and keep his investment gains: $130 million. In this way, Congress further enriches people like Trump, people who have the capital to go into real estate and qualify for tax exemptions under rules that exclude nearly all of their fellow Americans.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 1398-1404</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Also in 1990, Trump and Khashoggi were again linked through a prank designed to find out who was the cheapest rich person in New York. The satirical magazine Spy created a phony business and sent $1.11 refund checks to fifty-eight rich New Yorkers. Those who cashed the checks then got another refund check from the fake firm for half as much money. The prank ended when only two self-proclaimed billionaire penny pinchers were left. Donald Trump and Adnan Khashoggi had the dubious distinction of endorsing and depositing into their bank accounts fake refund checks for thirteen cents each.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 1463-1467</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Trump pointed out that he was campaigning against a rigged system. The Phoenix meeting was “evidence of a rigged system,” he said. He made no comment about his own investigation in Florida or his substantial campaign donation to Bondi.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 1566-1568</div></div><p>Trump failed to open a dialogue about his own hypocrisy. Color me  shocked. I&rsquo;m not sure what kind of person would do such a thing. Johnston insinuates that this is a special failing on Trump&rsquo;s part, but that&rsquo;s not obvious.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Trump campaign that the IRS had revoked the nonprofit status of Veterans for a Strong America due to their failure to file required disclosure reports. A charity disclosure organization, Guidestar, reported that it had no record of any board of directors. Every indication pointed to Veterans for a Strong America being a one-man enterprise run by a South Dakota lawyer named Joel Arends, whose operation was under investigation for suspected election improprieties in Arizona and Texas. Reporters later learned the organization had thirty dollars in the bank and debts ten times that size.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 1688-1692</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Instead, the paper got a call from “John Baron, a vice president of the Trump Organization.” Baron described himself as Donald Trump’s spokesperson. He said that taking the sculptures down would have cost $32,000, delayed the construction of Trump Tower by three weeks, and run the risk of killing people if the stones crashed to the ground. As for the missing grillwork, Baron said, “We don’t know what happened.” But there was no John Baron. The caller was Donald Trump. For years, Trump telephoned journalists using the name John Baron (or Barron).&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 1698-1703</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The reasons Trump was not forthright and candid are, ultimately, known only to Trump. But the Howard Stern Show was not his last opportunity to come clean about his use of fake identities to create the impression that the world’s most desirable women were banging on his bedroom door. The next time he was presented with a chance to set the record straight, Trump chose to tell a whopper on national television. This time, it served a very specific purpose: to advance his pursuit of the Oval Office.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 1829-1833</div></div><p>I just don&rsquo;t get the tone. He&rsquo;s presenting gossip and expecting us to be shocked. It&rsquo;s penny-ante stuff. Celebrity bullshit. Is it beneath the office? I think Kennedy, Nixon and Clinton have proved to us already that this is not the case.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Trump often threatens to sue journalists, ensuring caution from publishers and broadcasters who want to avoid a costly lawsuit—even one Trump cannot win. This tends to discourage investigation beyond the official talking points.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 1837-1839</div></div><p>That also goes a long way toward explaining the dryness, the toothlessness, of a lot of this book.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;In his second core strategy, Trump distorts information, contradicts himself, and blocks inquiries into his conduct by journalists, law enforcement, business regulators, and other people’s lawyers. Again, the record shows decades of Trump’s skill in pursuing this strategy successfully.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 1843-1845</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;That last option would seem unavailable to Trump, since he declared in October that he enjoys “the world’s greatest memory.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 1875-1876</div></div><p>Johnston leans really heavily on this statement (as well as the one about &ldquo;being the best at the Bible&rdquo;). But Johnston&rsquo;s entire book shows what a bloviating bag of hot air Trump is, a man whose statements often don&rsquo;t even last a day before he contradicts them. What is the point—the power—of using logic to trap him? He clearly doesn&rsquo;t care. Nor does he seem to have to since most Americans don&rsquo;t seem to care either.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Trump does not want reporters telling people, especially voters, about anything in his past that does not add a sheen to his marketing image. On the campaign trail, Trump dismisses questions about his past as beneath the dignity of journalists, even as he raises decades-old issues about the conduct of his Democratic opponent’s husband.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 1894-1896</div></div><p>In fairness, Trump was just making fake phone calls about imaginary girlfriends whereas Clinton was disenfranchising black people with actual legislation as president. Trump was bragging about grabbing women by the pussy while Clinton was shoving a cigar into a very young one in the oval office.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Satter obviously had an intimate familiarity with Trump’s intentions—only the day before, Trump had said he had no plans to inspect the site.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 1999-2000</div></div><p>Is this a lie? Or did he change his mind? Or does he just not care what the answer is to a question he feels he shouldn&rsquo;t have to answer from someone who he feels doesn&rsquo;t have the right to ask it? Trump is an egomaniac, of course. He&rsquo;s a liar, of course. But, as a private citizen, he has no obligation to answer a journalist&rsquo;s question truthfully, especially when it concerns his near-future whereabouts.</p>
<p>It is here that, again, I feel Johnston is really reaching for straws, trying to paint every nugget of data he has on Trump as not only negative (and that it most certainly is and probably fairly) but <em>damning</em>. I think it unfortunately weakens his case because he&rsquo;s taken the shotgun approach, with topics of wildly varying import. The ones that sound important peter out into no prosecution (and hence possibly speculation) and the ones that don&rsquo;t sound important then just seem petty and cheap.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Nearly two hundred people bought in, putting down more than $22 million in deposits in 2006, confident that the project was about to get underway and that before long they would move into their beachfront property and enjoy the security of a smart investment in a Trump-developed resort. A June 2007 newsletter notified buyers that construction was underway. The next month, the Trump Baja News reported, “our new and excited homeowners now&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 2088-2091</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Much later, three people who had made exclusive priority reservations complained that they were given five minutes to buy or walk. That didn’t even give them enough time to read the terms of their purchase contract, much less consult a lawyer. They signed, writing checks totaling more than $200,000. Some buyers later said they put their life’s savings into their eagerly anticipated new homes by the sea. They came to regret being so hasty and so trusting. Nearly two hundred people bought in, putting down more than $22 million in deposits in 2006, confident that the project was about to get underway and that before long they would move into their beachfront property and enjoy the security of a smart investment in a Trump-developed resort. A June 2007 newsletter notified buyers that construction was underway. The next month, the Trump Baja News reported, “our new and excited homeowners now are part of an elite group of vacation homeowners who own property developed by one of the most respected names in real estate, Donald J. Trump.” Three months later, in October, when Wall Street crashed under the weight of toxic mortgages and other Baja real estate projects faltered, the same newsletter carried a message “From the desk of Ivanka Trump.” Ivanka assured the buyers that their investment was sound. “Though it may be true that some of Baja’s developments could slow down, these market conditions simply do not apply to Trump Ocean Resort—or any other Trump development,” she wrote. Two months later, in December 2007, the newsletter advised buyers of newly discovered geological problems afflicting the building site. A few months later, in March 2008, anxious buyers received calls or letters. Construction loans had been approved, would be funded shortly, and work would be underway. This was nine months after buyers had been told in writing that construction had already begun. Still, construction did not proceed.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 2084-2099</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Trump’s lawyers made no mention of testimony from buyers that they were given just minutes to sign the purchase and other documents, leaving no time to read them or ask questions about the several pages of arcane legal details.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 2139-2141</div></div><p>It&rsquo;s hard to feel sorry for these &ldquo;investors&rdquo;. Whenever a story ends with someone having signed without reading because of time pressure…I kind of get distracted. I know that old people get entrapped in stuff like this. But why no prosecution? Is it because Trump—the bumbling, asocial fool—is so slick? Or because America&rsquo;s system is so morally bankrupt? In a place like America, don&rsquo;t sign anything without reading it. It&rsquo;s your own fault if you&rsquo;re trying to get rich quick.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Hawaii state law (like California and federal securities laws) protects buyers from false and misleading sales pitches. Hawaii law requires disclosure of all material facts to buyers. Trump’s status as a mere licensor was obviously material to making an investment decision based on the supposed value the Trump name would add to the building.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 2154-2156</div></div><p>I&rsquo;m sure it was disclosed somewhere—it was just that people didn&rsquo;t read it in their eagerness to cash in. The fact that this case—once again, and like many others—ended in a settlement with no criminal charges or sentence, suggests to me that there&rsquo;s more to the story again. It&rsquo;s possible that such malfeasance is nearly impossible to prove in America, or that Trump really knows everyone and buys of judges and DAs—but that&rsquo;s a much bigger charge. Instead, we&rsquo;re expected to believe that he just gets away with it because &ldquo;reasons&rdquo;. No charges or sentence—but we know he did it.<br>
 </p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;What kept Trump up all night was a Japanese gambler with a serene smile, a white shirt open at the collar, and gray wool slacks with pockets as big as bank vaults. Akio Kashiwagi was one of the world’s five biggest gamblers, literally a one-in-a-billion customer, who at that late hour in May 1990 was sitting at a green-felt table at Trump Plaza Hotel &amp; Casino calmly wagering $14 million an hour. He had been there for nearly a week.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 2181-2184</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Casino executives in London, Las Vegas, and Darwin, Australia, all pursued Kashiwagi, one of that rare breed of gamblers known as “whales,” because they risked $1 million or more during each casino visit. Kashiwagi—with his marathon multimillion-dollar sittings—remains, by far, the biggest whale ever beached in Atlantic City. Like the rest of the casino whales, Kashiwagi lived a financial life every bit as mysterious as the real denizens of the deep. The size and true source of his fortune were unfathomable.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 2212-2216</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The state deftly avoided investigating the more extensive wrongdoings that Libutti said he knew about. If proven, those claims would surely have cost Trump his license. Trump’s conduct with Libutti, including his claim that he hardly knew the man, was just one part of a long history of flouting the supposedly strict regulations of New Jersey casinos.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 2515-2518</div></div><p>I guess, but this whole book is full of allegations that went nowhere. If there&rsquo;s smoke there&rsquo;s fire, but dammit the guy is untouched over forty years. A true believer would round up each allegation to a conviction, but thats not how it works.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;As the many episodes recounted in these pages have shown, Trump is remarkably agile at doing as he chooses and getting away with it.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 2518-2519</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Trump’s relationships with criminals were often profitable, sometimes gratuitous, and never properly examined by those whose duty was to investigate.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 2541-2542</div></div><p>That&rsquo;s actually the crux of the book: the failure of the state in its duty, the crookedness of America.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Whether one adores Trump or is aghast, his public conduct should prompt us all to think about what qualities we want in our political leaders and why there is so much opportunity for someone like Trump to garner tens of millions of votes. We should ask ourselves why so many Americans are excited at the prospect of someone whose public statements show utter disregard for the checks and balances that buttress our system of self-government—<strong>a system that has made America, flaws and all, a beacon to the world for more than two centuries.</strong> (Emphasis added.)&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 2560-2564</div></div><p>That&rsquo;s a good, strong statement, right up until the utter, pandering, jingoistic and fact-free idiocy at the end. America is not a fucking beacon. Get over your stupid American exceptionalism. Obama was an asshole to keep babbling about that and Johnston should reexamine his own politics if believes that enough to cram into into an otherwise strong book. I can&rsquo;t help but feel Johnston threw that in for the potential Trump voter that he&rsquo;s trying to convince—to show that voter that Johnston is on their side.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;A president cannot dismiss a troublemaking foreign head of state, cannot order Congress to pass laws, and cannot disobey the rulings of judges—not if we are to be a free people, living subject to the rule of law that protects our individual liberties. Yet Trump makes clear that he would do all these things. His vision is, in many ways, not that of a president but of a dictator, as many others have observed in both political parties and beyond America’s borders.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 2570-2574</div></div><p>But you just wrote a book about how Trump is full of hot air and can&rsquo;t get anything done. Now you want us to believe he&rsquo;ll do what he says? Or that he&rsquo;ll somehow start accomplishing what he promises to do?</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;One need not be a believer to notice how at odds Trump’s many statements on religion are with the teachings of the Bible, Old Testament and New, and thus with his claim to be a Christian.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 2575-2577</div></div><p>Utterly of no greater interest to me than any of his other lies. Perhaps Johnston cares more—or thinks Trump&rsquo;s potential voters will care more when they see Trump&rsquo;s deception in this specific area. It is here where Johnston seems to veer from journalistic documentation to advocacy.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;While both Trump and Sanders can rally people, neither has put forth actual policy proposals that could move America from where things are to a fairer, more just, and widely prosperous society. Nothing in their pasts suggests that they have the political skill to wring change from the system if elected to the presidency. Hillary Clinton has the skill, but despite her decades of action on behalf of the less fortunate, it is not at all clear that this is foremost on her political agenda.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 2586-2589</div></div><p>WTF. Why broadside Bernie in the epilogue? To reluctantly push Hillary? Or try to pretend that you&rsquo;re not pushing Hillary? Bernie has decades of experience and his policies haven&rsquo;t moved much.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The Founders believed that knowledge and reason must be the cornerstones of our representative democracy if we are to govern ourselves. So spend time learning and then do your duty as a citizen. Vote.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 2589-2591</div></div><p>Also utterly untrue. The founders as a whole believed no such thing. A few espoused views to that effect, but their overall influence on the group and on the Constitution was not large enough to effect their policies.</p>
      </div>
      </div>
        <div class="footer">
    <div class="footer-data"><div class="footer-links"><ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/contact.php" title="">Contact</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/support.php" title="">Support</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/privacy.php" title="">Privacy</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/rights.php" title="">Rights</a></li></ul></div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="copyright">Copyright (c) 1999-2026 earthli.com. All Rights Reserved.</div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="versions">Powered by <ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore/app_news.php">earthli News 3.7</a></li><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore" title="">earthli WebCore&trade; 3.7</a></li></ul></div></div>    </div>
      </div>
  </div>  </body>
</html>
]]>
  </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
      <title type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[The Island of the Day Before by Umberto Eco (1994/en-1995) (read in 2017)]]>
  </title>
    <id>https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3442</id>
    <link href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3442"/>
    <updated>2017-10-02T22:12:31+02:00</updated>
    <author>
        <name type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[Marco von Ballmoos]]>
  </name>
      <uri>https://earthli.com/users/marco</uri>
    </author>
      <summary type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<blockquote class="quote abstract "><div>Disclaimer: these are notes I took while reading this book. They include citations I found interesting or enlightening or particularly well-written. In some cases, I&rsquo;ve pointed out which of these applies to which citation; in others, I have not. Any benefit you gain from reading these notes is... [<a class="complete-text-link" href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3442">More</a>]</div></blockquote>]]>
  </summary>
      <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<html lang="en">
  <head>
    <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/themes/ice.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/fonts/raleway.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/core/medium.css">
  </head>
  <body>
<div class="style-controls">  <div class="page">
    <div class="page-body">
<div class="info-box-top">
<p>
Published by <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_user.php?name=marco" title="Marco von Ballmoos" class="visible">marco</a> on <span class="date-time">2. Oct 2017 22:12:31 (GMT-5)</span>
</p>
</div>
      <div class="text-flow wide">
  <blockquote class="quote abstract "><div>Disclaimer: these are notes I took while reading this book. They include citations I found interesting or enlightening or particularly well-written. In some cases, I&rsquo;ve pointed out which of these applies to which citation; in others, I have not. Any benefit you gain from reading these notes is purely incidental to the purpose they serve of reminding me what I once read. Please see Wikipedia for a summary if I&rsquo;ve failed to provide one sufficient for your purposes. If my notes serve to trigger an interest in this book, then I&rsquo;m happy for you.</div></blockquote><p>This is the story of Roberto de la Griva, an Italian stranded on an island somewhere in the Pacific Ocean. We hear of how he was at the wars between the Spanish, French and Italians over northern Italy. We hear of how he lost his father. We learn of his education in the salons of Paris. We hear how he is railroaded into a journey to the other side of the world by French intriguers high up in government bent on learning the secrets of the Meridians before the Dutch.</p>
<p>We learn of various mechanisms by which one might determine the Meridian. Many are absolutely hare-brained and doubtless thoroughly researched by the author.</p>
<p>When Roberto ends up stranded on the island, he has arrived there after his first ship—<em>The Amaryllis</em>—has shipwrecked. On that boat, he&rsquo;d befriended an Englishman (Byrd) who&rsquo;d seemingly discovered a way of determining the meridian by using &ldquo;empathy at a distance&rdquo;, a ludicrous scientific theory whereby the blade that caused a wound can be used to influence the wound afterwards. Apply salve to the blade and the wounded is instantaneously soothed; apply fire and the wounded writhes in further pain. Since the action is instantaneous and occurs at a distance with no known physical mechanism, the clever Englishman wounds a dog in England, takes it with him on his journey, and then keeps the wound open for the entire journey to the Antipodes. The blade is subjected to actions at agreed-upon times, so that Byrd knows the time accurately enough in England to calculate his longitudinal position.</p>
<p>This is obvious balderdash and good riddance to the lot of them. Roberto sees that Byrd is most likely seeing what he wants to see and likely has no more real idea where he is than countless sailors before him.</p>
<p>When the ship wrecks, Roberto escapes with his life, bumping up against the <em>Daphne</em>, a pristine and (nearly) abandoned ship moored about a mile off of the eponymous island. Roberto investigates the boat, only to find unexpected scientific treasures that indicate that the <em>Daphne</em> was perhaps on the same mission as the <em>Amaryllis</em>. He suspects an &ldquo;Intruder&rdquo; on his boat and eventually meets Father Caspar (or does he?): a Jesuit, with whom he discusses various scientific topics like the position and motion of astral bodies, the composition of matter and so on. Many of these concepts are discarded theories from past centuries, lovingly brought back to life by Eco, the master of such arcana. In a way, the theories of today sound just as hare-brained, leading one to wonder with what laughter they will be greeted by subsequent generations.</p>
<p>The good father can make not only a water-pumped musical organ but can also teach Roberto to swim and has also invented an underwater diving apparatus. It is a veritable tour-de-force of 16th-century science. He drowns in it, trying to get to the Island of the Day Before?</p>
<p>Why is it called that? Because the good father believes he has navigated to the antemeridian, the Antipodes, so that the island lies constantly in yesterday relative to the <em>Daphne</em>&rsquo;s today.</p>
<p>Was he correct? It is hard to know. He was trying to reach the island to get to the Speculum Melitensis, a device he&rsquo;d constructed on the island that somehow encompasses every amazing bit of scientific knowledge and insight wrapped in one giant, delicate object. It was set up by Caspar and the sailors but has now likely dropped into disrepair. Subsequent chapters throw doubt on the reality of Father Caspar entirely.</p>
<p>Roberto also spends an interminable time wondering about the fire dove that Caspar described seeing on the island, but he fails to descry it even once. This does not stop Eco—in the form of the modern-day editor of Roberto&rsquo;s tale—from going on at tedious length about everything he knows about doves and their significance in legend.</p>
<p>The book picks up significantly in the final third, as Roberto spins onion-shells of stories around his lady love, Lydia, whom he forces into a tryst with his nonexistent brother Ferrante (resurrected from his psyche) so that Roberto&rsquo;s own love can be best expressed in a white-hot jealousy that he himself controls. Ferrante&rsquo;s track through Europe and purported/fictitious crossing with Roberto—and all of the people Roberto met in Paris, like Richelieu and Mazarin—is a rollicking tale, well-told.</p>
<p>He ends up a pirate, heading for the exact island off of which the <em>Daphne</em> is anchored, on a ship crewed by micreants, with Lydia hidden on-board as an androgyne sailor and his nemesis lashed to a cross in the hold, serving in the role of the wounded dog in Ferrante&rsquo;s ship&rsquo;s longitudinal instrument. They visit island after island, one more bizarre than the next (similar to Gulliver in Swift&rsquo;s tale, with Roberto serving in the role of the narrator from <em>Cloud Atlas</em>). None of this actually happens, other than in Roberto&rsquo;s fevered mind, desperately trying to build a life with his love from hallucinatory fragments.</p>
<p>As usual with Eco, it&rsquo;s nearly impossible to tell which way is up, which tale is true, whether Roberto is even on the boat or trapped on the island in the form of Ferrante, imagining himself elsewhere, or vice versa. The master at work.</p>
<h2>Citations</h2><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;It is difficult to reconstruct the actions and feelings of a character surely afire with true love, for you never know whether he is expressing what he feels or what the rules of amorous discourse prescribe in his case—but then, for that matter, what do we know of the difference between passion felt and passion expressed, and who can say which has precedence?&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 5</div></div><p>Classic Eco.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;"Sir,&ldquo; Pozzo said, &ldquo;be so kind as to make way for us, for we must go and take up our proper position in order to fire on you.&rdquo;  The officer doffed his hat, bowed with a salute that would have swept dust two meters before him, and said: &ldquo;Señor, no es menor gloria veneer al enemigo con la cortesía en la paz que con las armas en la guerra.&rdquo; Then, in good Italian, he added: &ldquo;Proceed, sir. If a fourth of our men prove to have one half of your courage, we will win. May Heaven grant me the pleasure of meeting you on the field of battle, and the honor of killing you.&rdquo;&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 31</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;In short, there will be glory for all. Now let us go to supper. The siege has only begun and provisions are still plentiful. It will be a while before we start eating the rats.&ldquo;&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 35</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Now Jesuits lascivious as rams fulminate against the readers of Rabelais and the Latin poets, and would have us all be virtuous and kill the Huguenots. Lord God, war is a beautiful thing, but I want to fight for my own pleasure and not because my adversary eats meat on Friday. The pagans were wiser than we. They had their three gods, but at least their mother Cybele did not claim to give birth and yet remain a virgin.&rdquo;&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 60</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;the first quality of an honest man is contempt for religion, which would have us afraid of the most natural thing in the world, which is death; and would have us hate the one beautiful thing destiny has given us, which is life. We should rather aspire to a heaven where only the planets live in eternal bliss, receiving neither rewards nor condemnations, but enjoying merely their own eternal motion in the arms of the void. Be strong like the sages of ancient Greece and look at death with steady eye and no fear. Jesus sweated too much, awaiting it. Why should he have been afraid, for that matter, since he was going to rise again?&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 60</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The wise man must attack falsehood not only with his sword but also with his tongue. My friends, how can you call merciful a divinity that desires our eternal unhappiness only to appease his rage of an instant? We must forgive our neighbor, and he need not? And we should love such a cruel being?&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 61</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;That infinity of worlds of which Saint-Savin spoke to him was to be sought beyond the constellations, in the very center of this bubble of space of which he, pure eye, was now the source of infinite parallaxes.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 66</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Stop, Monsieur de la Grive, draw your sword once again, like that, parry, there! You set your heels along the same line: a mistake, for you jeopardize the steadiness of your legs. The head must not be held erect, because the space between the shoulder and the neck exposes an excessive surface to the blows of the adversary….&ldquo;&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 80</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;But you see how man is also machine, and it suffices to turn one wheel on the surface and other wheels then turn inside: the brother and the enmity are merely the reflection of the fear that each man has of himself, of the recesses of his own soul, where unconfessed desires lurk, or, as they are saying in Paris, unconscious concepts.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 82</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;&rdquo;You cannot believe what you are saying.&ldquo; &ldquo;Well, no. Hardly ever. But the philosopher is like the poet. The latter composes ideal letters for an ideal nymph, only to plumb with his words the depths of passion. The philosopher tests the coldness of his gaze, to see how far he can undermine the fortress of bigotry.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 83</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;If Genius, &amp; therefore Learning, consists in connecting remote Notions &amp; finding Similitude in things dissimilar, then Metaphor, the most acute and farfetched among Tropes, is the only one capable of producing Wonder, which gives birth to Pleasure, as do changes of scene in the theater. And if the Pleasure produced by Figures derives from learning new things without effort &amp; many things in small volume, then Metaphor, setting our mind to flying betwixt one Genus &amp; another, allows us to discern in a single Word more than one Object.&rdquo;&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 90</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Hear me out. For half an hour you have been interrupting me to say what you think and, under the guise of questioning me, you would show me I am mistaken. Never do this again, especially with the powerful. Occasions will arise when confidence in your own perspicacity and the impulse to tell the truth will enable you to give sound advice to someone of higher station. Never do it. Every victory produces hatred in the vanquished, and if the victory is over one&rsquo;s own master, then it is foolish or harmful. Princes wish to be assisted, not outstripped. But you must be prudent also with your equals. Do not humiliate them by your merits.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 111</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Dissimulating means drawing a veil composed of honest shadows, which does not constitute falsehood but allows truth some respite.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 112</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;He envisaged situations in which La Novarese, pursued by Landsknechts, fell overcome into his arms as he routed the assailants and led her, exhausted, into a garden where he enjoyed her wild gratitude.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 127</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;As His Eminence the Cardinal is accustomed to saying, the innate frivolity of the French brings them to desire change&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 183</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;"You have succumbed to the vices of this city and this country. As His Eminence the Cardinal is accustomed to saying, the innate frivolity of the French brings them to desire change because of the tedium caused by the present. Some of these light-minded gentlemen, whom the King has taken care to make still lighter by relieving them of their head, seduced you with their subversive propositions. Your case is not the sort that need disturb any tribunal. The States, whose preservation is of necessity extremely dear to us, would quickly be ruined if in matters of crime that tend to their subversion we demanded proofs of the sort required in common&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 183</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;"We would be lacking in Christian charity if we absolutely denied the possibility of your innocence or of our being victim of a misunderstanding. But the misunderstanding so coincides with our plans that we see no reason to examine it. For that matter, you would not wish to insinuate that we are proposing to you a dishonest exchange, as if to say either you are innocent and to the block with you, or self-confessed guilty and, by perjury, in our service….&ldquo;&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 185</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The plague is transmitted, as everyone knows, through venenific unguents, and he had read of people who died by wetting a finger with saliva as they leafed through works whose pages had in fact been smeared with a poison.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 248</div></div><p>From <em>The Name of the Rose</em>. Cheeky.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;It is as if from a held breath, from a coal reddening through an inner respiration, from that göldene Quelle des Universums was born a scale of luminous excellences gradually descending towards the most irreparable of imperfections; as if the creative afflatus came from the infinite and concentrated luminous power of the Divinity, so searing that it seems to us dark night, down through the relative perfection of the Cherubim and the Seraphim, through the Thrones and the Dominions, to the lowest waste where the worm crawls and the insensible stone survives at the very border of the Void. &ldquo;And this was the Offenbarung gottlicher Mayestat!&rdquo;&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 256</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Was it not beautiful to imagine the Father of the Universe blowing on that still-green ball, urging it to celebrate its victory twelve hours after the birth of Time, right here on the Antipodal Meridian where they stood at this moment?&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 258</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Roberto reasoned that if God removed the water of yesterday and placed it in today, the earth of yesterday might undergo a succussation thanks to that damned center of gravity, but to human beings this should not matter: in their yesterday the succussation had not taken place; it had happened instead in a yesterday of God, who clearly knew how to handle different times and different stories, as a Narrator who writes several novels, all with the same characters, but making different things befall them from story to story.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 267</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;"Bravo, Signor Roberto! You would not allow that the heavens are of crystal, because you were afraid the comets would break them, but you like them to be liquid, so the birds inside them drown! Further, this idea of vortices explains that the earth turns around the sun, but does not turn on itself as a child&rsquo;s top spins!&rdquo; &ldquo;Yes, but that philosopher said also that in this case it is the surface of the seas and the superficial crust of our globe that revolve, while the deep core remains still. I think.&rdquo;&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 314</div></div><p>The discussion of scientific ideas and theories reminds me of the Baroque Cycle. the search for truth. the discovery of the meridians…</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;But Roberto already knew what the Jesuit&rsquo;s real objection would be. Like that of the abbé on that evening of the duel when Saint-Savin provoked him: If there are infinite worlds, the Redemption can no longer have any meaning, and we are obliged either to imagine infinite Calvaries or to look on our terrestrial flowerbed as a privileged spot of the Cosmos, on which God permitted His Son to descend and free us from sin, while the other worlds were not granted this grace—to the discredit of His infinite goodness. And, in fact, this was the response of Father Caspar, which allowed Roberto to attack.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 316</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;He lied often but never pointlessly. He knew that to be believed he had to make everyone see that sometimes he told the truth to his own disadvantage, and kept silent when the truth might win him praise. On the other hand, he tried to gain the reputation of a man sincere with his inferiors, so that their words would reach the ears of the powerful. He became convinced that to simulate with one&rsquo;s equals is a fault, but not to simulate with one&rsquo;s superiors is foolhardiness.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 371</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;[…] with his betters he took care to make his ignorance evident, while seeming to admire in them what he already knew.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 372</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Here, wishing to invent a passage that no author of novels had yet conceived, to portray the feelings of that greedy youth preparing to conquer the city that was a compendium of Europe&rsquo;s civility, Asia&rsquo;s profusion, Africa&rsquo;s extravagance, and America&rsquo;s riches, where novelty had its realm, deceit its palace, luxury its center, courage its arena, beauty its hemicycle, fashion its cradle, and virtue its grave, Roberto put into Ferrante&rsquo;s mouth an arrogant cry: &ldquo;Paris, a nous deux!&rdquo;&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 376</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Ferrante considered woman the portrait of inconstancy, minister of fraud, fickle in speech, belated in action, and quick in caprice. Educated by would-be ascetics who never ceased reminding him that El hombre es el fuego, la mujer la estopa, viene el diablo y sopla, he was accustomed to considering every daughter of Eve an imperfect animal, an error of Nature, a torture for the eyes if ugly, a suffering of the heart if beautiful, tyrant of any who loved her, enemy of any who scorned her, disordered in her desires, implacable in her dislikes, capable of enchanting with the mouth and enchaining with the eyes.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 381</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Why not consider these fish the inhabitants of a world that has its forests, its peaks, its trees, and its valleys, and knows nothing of the world above the surface? Similarly, we live with no knowledge that the curved sky conceals other worlds, where people do not walk or swim but fly and navigate through the air. If what we call planets are the keels of their vessels, of which we see only the shining bottom, then these children of Neptune must see above them the shadow of our galleons and consider them heavenly bodies moving through their aqueous firmament.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 415</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;"In person, my dear brother. I, who—as you were struggling like a dog or a frog—found my ship again on the far side of the Island, and sailed through my long Thursday towards Jerusalem, found the other Judas on the verge of betraying, hanged him from a fig tree, preventing him from handing over the Son of Man to the Sons of Darkness, entered the Garden of Olives with my men and abducted Our Lord, stealing Him from Calvary! And now you, I, all of us are living in a world that has never been redeemed!&rdquo;  &ldquo;But Christ? Where is Christ now?&rdquo; &ldquo;Do you then not know that the ancient texts already said there are doves the color of flame because the Lord, before being crucified, wore a scarlet tunic? Have you not yet understood? For one thousand six hundred and ten years Christ has been prisoner on the Island, whence He tries to escape in the form of an Orange Dove, but is unable to abandon that place, where next to the Specula Melitensis I have left Judas&rsquo;s scapular, and where it is therefore forever the same day.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 458</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;For that matter, how long was the time when I did not exist, and for how long in the future will I not be? I occupy a very small space in the abyss of the years. This little interval does not succeed in distinguishing me from the nothingness into which I shall go. I came into the world only to swell the ranks. My part was so small that even if I had remained in the wings, everyone would still have declared the play perfect.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 466</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;But an atom divisible to infinity, producing parts ever smaller and ever more divisible, would lead me to a moment where matter would be nothing but infinite divisibility, and all its hardness and its fullness would be sustained by this simple balancing among voids. Matter, rather than feeling a horror of the Void, would then worship it, and would be composed of it, would be void-in-itself, absolute vacuity. Absolute vacuity would be at the very heart of the unthinkable geometrical point, and this point would be only the island of Utopia we dream of, in an ocean made always and only of water.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 472</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;[…] movements of the atoms that compose me, that is, the stable vibration of the positions that the parts of my parts of my parts maintain among themselves. I would feel the hum of my stoning. But I could not say I, because to say I there must be others, something else against which to oppose myself. In principle the stone cannot know if there is anything outside itself. It hums. Its stoning is a stoning of stoning. Of the rest it knows nothing. It is a world. A world that worlds along on its own.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 475</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;[…] the Austral Winds, with Boreas and Eurus, staunch enemies of the calm of the sea—even if till now they had left to the placid Zephyrs the responsibility of following the path along which the Tweede Daphne continued her voyage—were beginning to show signs of impatience in the confinement of their subterranean chambers. He made them burst forth all at once. The groan of the timbers covered the ground bass of the sailors&rsquo; lamentations, the sea vomited upon them and they vomited into the sea, and sometimes a wave so enfolded them that from the shore one might have mistaken that deck for a coffin of ice, around which the thunderbolts flared like wax tapers.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 484</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;At first the storm set clouds against clouds, waters against waters, winds against winds. But soon the sea abandoned its prescribed limits and grew, swelling, towards the sky, and rain came pouring down, the water mixed with the air, the birds learning to swim and the fish to fly. It was no longer a struggle of Nature against the seamen but a battle of the elements among themselves. Not one atom of air swirled but that it was not transformed into a pellet of hail, and Neptune rose to extinguish the fire in Jove&rsquo;s hands, to rob him of the pleasure of burning those humans whom Neptune wanted instead to drown.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 485</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;All was enveloped in a light haze, as happens when the sun has just disappeared and the night has not yet taken possession of the sky.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 487</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Thus each of us yearns for a decomposition that—as well we know—will never be total; we wish that for us Eternity has not yet begun, yet we fear that we have been in it ever since our remote arrival on this shore. Living, we believed Hell was the place of eternal despair, because so they told us. Alas, no, for it is the place of undying hope, which makes each day worse than the one before, as this thirst, which is kept alive in us, is never slaked.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 490</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;&rdquo;And God—?&rdquo; Ferrante asked. &ldquo;Does God laugh?&rdquo; &ldquo;No, alas,&rdquo; the excoriated man replied, &ldquo;because even humiliation would exalt us. How beautiful it would be if we could see at least a laughing God come to taunt us! What distraction, the spectacle of the Lord who from His throne, among His saints, makes sport of us. We would have the sight of another&rsquo;s joy, as cheering as the sight of another&rsquo;s frown. No, here no one is outraged, no one laughs, no one shows himself. God is not here. Here there is only hope without goal.&rdquo;&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 491</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;But Roberto, as we have seen, having begun with the idea that the Land of Romances was completely separate from his own world, had finally come to make the two universes flow effortlessly one into the other, and he had mingled their laws. He thought that he could arrive at the Island because he was imagining his arrival, and that he could imagine hers at the moment when he was already there, because this was what he wished. On the other hand, he was transferring to his own world that freedom to will events and to see them achieved which makes Romances unpredictable. Finally, he would reach the Island for the simple reason that if he did not reach it, he would no longer know what story to tell.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 497</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;[…] phantom vessel, its bulwarks encrusted with shells, green with seaweed, water stagnating in its riven hold, a refuge of mollusks and poisonous fish.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 508</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Nor could I elude the childish curiosity of the reader, who would want to know if Roberto really wrote the pages on which I have dwelt far too long. In all honesty, I would have to reply that it is not impossible that someone else wrote them, someone who wanted only to pretend to tell the truth. And thus I would lose all the effect of the novel: where, yes, you pretend to tell true things, but you must not admit seriously that you are pretending.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 512</div></div><p>Here he sounds so much like Žižek, who also dwells on the difference between knowing something and having proof of it.</p>
      </div>
      </div>
        <div class="footer">
    <div class="footer-data"><div class="footer-links"><ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/contact.php" title="">Contact</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/support.php" title="">Support</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/privacy.php" title="">Privacy</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/rights.php" title="">Rights</a></li></ul></div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="copyright">Copyright (c) 1999-2026 earthli.com. All Rights Reserved.</div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="versions">Powered by <ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore/app_news.php">earthli News 3.7</a></li><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore" title="">earthli WebCore&trade; 3.7</a></li></ul></div></div>    </div>
      </div>
  </div>  </body>
</html>
]]>
  </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
      <title type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[The Devils of Loudon by Aldous Huxley (1953) (read in 2017)]]>
  </title>
    <id>https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3441</id>
    <link href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3441"/>
    <updated>2017-10-02T21:50:12+02:00</updated>
    <author>
        <name type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[Marco von Ballmoos]]>
  </name>
      <uri>https://earthli.com/users/marco</uri>
    </author>
      <summary type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<blockquote class="quote abstract "><div>Disclaimer: these are notes I took while reading this book. They include citations I found interesting or enlightening or particularly well-written. In some cases, I&rsquo;ve pointed out which of these applies to which citation; in others, I have not. Any benefit you gain from reading these notes is... [<a class="complete-text-link" href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3441">More</a>]</div></blockquote>]]>
  </summary>
      <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<html lang="en">
  <head>
    <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/themes/ice.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/fonts/raleway.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/core/medium.css">
  </head>
  <body>
<div class="style-controls">  <div class="page">
    <div class="page-body">
<div class="info-box-top">
<p>
Published by <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_user.php?name=marco" title="Marco von Ballmoos" class="visible">marco</a> on <span class="date-time">2. Oct 2017 21:50:12 (GMT-5)</span>
</p>
</div>
      <div class="text-flow wide">
  <blockquote class="quote abstract "><div>Disclaimer: these are notes I took while reading this book. They include citations I found interesting or enlightening or particularly well-written. In some cases, I&rsquo;ve pointed out which of these applies to which citation; in others, I have not. Any benefit you gain from reading these notes is purely incidental to the purpose they serve of reminding me what I once read. Please see Wikipedia for a summary if I&rsquo;ve failed to provide one sufficient for your purposes. If my notes serve to trigger an interest in this book, then I&rsquo;m happy for you.</div></blockquote><p>In this book, Huxley tackles the historical subject of the possession by the devil of the Urseline nuns in Loudun in the 17th century. The affair was a scientific and judicial disaster, by today&rsquo;s standards. And our standards aren&rsquo;t even very high, to be honest. The story centers on the prosecution of Father Urban Grandier, a priest in early 17th-century France in the Diocese of Lourdes. He is eminently fallible, especially as far as his vow of celibacy goes. He is not a very nice man, loving and leaving and focusing fairly narrowly on Father Urban Grandier rather than the concerns of his flock. He gives interesting and rousing services, but that&rsquo;s about where his dedication to the flock ends. He is far more interested in personal power, in climbing the Church ladder and in boinking pretty young things.</p>
<p>Naturally, there are other forces at work, not including local and powerful merchants as well as other members of the Church in places as far-flung from Lourdes as Paris. Even Richelieu and Louis XIII are involved, at least by name.</p>
<p>Grandier&rsquo;s single-mindedness eventually backfires as he collects far too many enemies—all of whom are bereft of any scruples or devotion to a sound justice system. When the prioress of a local convent goes off her gourd, her obsession with Grandier is the key to his undoing. His enemies harness her insanity, use several torturers/exorcisers to rouse similar libidinous and salacious feelings in the other nuns and then begin a campaign to blame the whole sordid situation on Urban&rsquo;s consorting with the Devil and then corrupting and/or possessing and/or fucking the nuns (naturally, in absentia and through the demons he controls). The exorcism circus continues for <em>months</em>, if not years, establishing itself as very lucrative—if exhausting—for the nuns, who are forced to put on sometimes-daily shows</p>
<p>It&rsquo;s all utter hogwash, as most participants—the accusers, Grandier and the nuns—know. Some believe in the possessions, but they are willing participants like the exorcist, who delights in sexually torturing the nuns with enemas and other implements, all in the name of God.</p>
<p>The book sounds more exciting than it actually is. There are long, historical sections as well as treatises on the mind of the average citizen of France (or the world, for that matter) at the time. These discussions of the state of psychology, science and sociology at the time are fascinating, if a bit long-winded. As well, the notion of demonic possession is placed into historical and scientific perspective. Huxley&rsquo;s fascination and experience with psychedelics and altered mental states serves him well here, I think.</p>
<p>Huxley is extremely well- and widely read, freely mixing passages in the original, archaic French and Latin. The material is thoroughly footnoted and draws on both original source material as well as other studies of on this supposed possession done throughout the intervening centuries. His approach differs in that he examines the whole sordid tale through the lens of the 16th-century Frenchman&rsquo;s context, complete with the social and scientific mores of the day that an average citizen had at his or her disposal. He dismisses the reality of the possession and tries to understand what lessons we can learn about human nature, religion and our capability of understanding the universe to any reliable degree whatsoever.</p>
<p>Again, this may still sound more interesting than it actually is. The prose is dense as well as a bit dated. I liked the overall story arc and was brought to the book by Ken Russell&rsquo;s 1970 film, <em>The Devils</em>, which was fantastic.</p>
<h2>Citations</h2><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Partisan loyalty is socially disastrous; but for individuals it can be richly rewarding—more rewarding, in many ways, than even concupiscence or avarice. Whoremongers and money-grubbers find it hard to feel very proud of their activities. But partisanship is a complex passion which permits those who indulge in it to make the best of both worlds. Because they do these things for the sake of a group which is, by definition, good and even sacred, they can admire themselves and loathe their neighbors, they can seek power and money, can enjoy the pleasures of aggression and cruelty, not merely without feeling guilty, but with a positive glow of conscious virtue. Loyalty to their group transforms these pleasant vices into acts of heroism.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 499-504</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;To think about events realistically, in terms of multiple causations, is hard and emotionally unrewarding. How much easier, how much more agreeable to trace each effect to a single and, if possible, a personal cause! To the illusion of understanding will be joined, in this case, the pleasure of hero worship, if the circumstances are favorable, and the equal, or even greater pleasure, if they should be unfavorable, of persecuting a scapegoat.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 527-530</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;In fact, of course, destiny had already begun to render its account, but unobtrusively. He had suffered no hurt that he could feel, only an imperceptible coarsening and hardening, only a progressive darkening of the inner light, a gradual narrowing of the soul’s window on the side of eternity.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 553-555</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Descent is always easy, and in this case there would be plenty of casuistry to lubricate the slide, and, after the bottom had been reached, all the absolution a girl could ask for.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 735-737</div></div><p>Methinks lubricate and bottom here are not at all accidental</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;From the many well-authenticated cases on record it is clear that ESP and prevision sometimes take place spontaneously, and that the persons in whom they occur are aware of the event and strongly convinced of the truth of the information which is being conveyed. In the spiritual field we find analogous records of spontaneous theophanies. By a grace of sudden intuition, the normally unknowable makes itself known, and the knowledge is self-validating beyond the possibility of doubt.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 1368-1371</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;It is worth remarking that this experience of a divinity immanent in natural objects came also to Surin. In a few brief notations he records that there were times when he actually perceived the full majesty of God in a tree, a passing animal. But, strangely enough, he never wrote at any length about this beatific vision of the Absolute in the relative. And even to the recipients of his spiritual letters he never suggested that obedience to Christ’s injunction to consider the lilies might help the blindly groping soul to come to a knowledge of God. One can only suppose that the acquired belief in the total depravity of fallen nature was stronger, in his mind, than the givenness of his own experience. The dogmatic words he had learned at Sunday School were opaque enough to eclipse the immediate Fact. “If you wish to see It before your eyes,” writes the Third Patriarch of Zen, “have no fixed notions either for or against It.” But fixing notions is the professional occupation of theologians, and both Surin and his master were theologians before they were seekers for enlightenment.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 1591-1599</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>“[…] one busies oneself with works of zeal and charity; but is it from a pure motive of zeal and charity? Is it not, perhaps, because one finds a personal satisfaction in this kind of thing, because one does not care for prayer or study, because one cannot bear to stay in one’s room, cannot stomach seclusion and recollectedness?”</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 1635-1638</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;It is by thinking and acting in any given situation, not as we would normally think and act, but rather as we imagine that we should do, if we were like some other and better person, that we finally cease to be like our old selves and come, instead, to resemble our ideal model.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 1817-1819</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;We all imagine ourselves to be simultaneously clear-sighted and impenetrable; but, except when blinded by some infatuation, other people can see through us just as easily as we can see through them. The discovery of this fact is apt to be exceedingly disconcerting.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 1877-1879</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;A generation earlier than the Marquis, François Boucher had produced, in L’Attente du Clystère, the most terrific pin-up girl of the century, perhaps of all time. From the savagely obscene and the gracefully pornographic there is an easy modulation to Rabelaisian fun and the smoking-room joke.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 6705-6707</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;In medieval and early modern Christendom the situation of sorcerers and their clients was almost precisely analogous to that of Jews under Hitler, capitalists under Stalin, Communists and fellow travelers in the United States. They were regarded as the agents of a Foreign Power, unpatriotic at the best and, at the worst, traitors, heretics, enemies of the people. Death was the penalty meted out to these metaphysical Quislings of the past and, in most parts of the contemporary world, death is the penalty which awaits the political and secular devil-worshipers known here as Reds, there as Reactionaries.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 2194-2198</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;[…] medieval village life, for which the sentimentalists, whose dislike of the present blinds them to the no less enormous horrors of the past, still nostalgically yearn.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 2294-2295</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;And Montaigne concludes with one of those golden sentences which deserve to be inscribed over the altar of every church, above the bench of every magistrate, on the walls of every lecture hall, every senate and parliament, every government office and council chamber. “After all,” (write the words in neon, write in letters as tall as a man!) “after all, it is rating one’s conjectures at a very high price to roast a man alive on the strength of them.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 2344-2347</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;(The history of spiritualism makes it very clear that fraud, especially pious fraud, is perfectly compatible with faith.)&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 2394-2395</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;AT ANY given time and place certain thoughts are completely unthinkable. But this radical unthinkableness of certain thoughts is not paralleled by any radical unfeelableness of certain emotions, or any radical undoableness of the actions inspired by such emotions. Anything can at all times be felt and acted upon, albeit sometimes with great difficulty and in the teeth of general disapproval. But though individuals can always feel and do whatever their temperament and constitution permit them to feel and do, they cannot think about their experiences except within the frame of reference which, at that particular time and place, has come to seem self-evident. Interpretation is in terms of the prevailing thought-pattern, and this thought-pattern conditions to some extent the expression of urges and emotions, but can never completely inhibit them. For example, a firm belief in eternal damnation can coexist in the believer’s mind with the knowledge that he or she is committing mortal sin.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 2758-2765</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;For our ancestors there was only the soul or conscious self, on the one hand, and on the other God, the saints and a host of good and evil spirits. Our conception of a vast intermediate world of subconscious mental activity, much more extensive and, in certain respects, more effective than the activity of the conscious self, was unthinkable. The current theory of human nature had left no place for it; consequently, so far as our ancestors were concerned, it did not exist. The phenomena which we now explain in terms of this subconscious activity had either to be denied altogether, or else attributed to the action of nonhuman spirits. Thus, catalepsy was either a humbug or a symptom of diabolic infestation.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 2849-2854</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The coming of Descartes and the general acceptance of what at that time seemed a more “scientific” theory of human nature did not improve matters; indeed, in some respects it caused men’s thinking about themselves to become less realistic than it had been under the older dispensation. Devils passed out of the picture; but along with the devils went any kind of serious consideration of the phenomena once attributed to diabolic agency. The exorcists had at least recognized such facts as trance, catalepsy, split personality and extrasensory perception. The psychologists who came after Descartes were inclined either to dismiss the facts as nonexistent, or to account for them, if they did not permit themselves to be dismissed, as the product of a something called “imagination.” For men of science, “imagination” was almost synonymous with “illusion.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 2864-2869</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;But there were many who never thought of the matter in purely psychological terms. To them it seemed obvious that such phenomena as were manifested by Sœur Jeanne could be explained in terms of physiology and ought to be treated accordingly. The more Draconian among them prescribed the application to the bare skin of a good birch rod. Tallemant records that the Marquis de Couldray-Montpensier withdrew his two possessed daughters from the hands of the exorcists and “had them well fed and soundly whipped; the devil took his leave immediately.” At Loudun itself, during the later stages of the possession, the whip was prescribed with increasing frequency, and Surin records that devils who merely laughed at the rites of the Church were often routed by the discipline.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 2889-2895</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;However farcically the figure of fun, Fitzdottrel is nonetheless a truly Representative Man. He stands for a whole epoch, whose intellectual life was straddled insecurely between two worlds. That he tried to make the worst of both worlds, instead of the best, is also sadly typical. For the unregenerate, occultism and “projects” are considerably more attractive than pure science and the worship of God in spirit.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 2991-2994</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;We have seen that the plausibility of the hypothesis of possession was exactly proportionate to the inadequacy of a physiology without cell structure or chemistry, and of a psychology which took practically no account of mental activity on subconscious levels. Once universal, belief in possession is entertained at the present time only by Roman Catholics and Spiritists.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 3003-3006</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Nothing compels us to believe that the only intelligences in the universe are those connected with the bodies of human beings and the lower animals. If the evidence for clairvoyance, telepathy and prevision is accepted (and it is becoming increasingly difficult to reject it), then we must allow that there are mental processes which are largely independent of space, time and matter. And if this is so, there seems to be no reason for denying a priori that there may be nonhuman intelligences, either completely discarnate, or else associated with cosmic energy in some way of which we are still ignorant. (We are still ignorant, incidentally, of the way in which human minds are associated with that highly organized vortex of cosmic energy known as a body. That some association exists is evident; but how energy gets transformed into mental processes, and how mental processes affect energy, we still have no idea.*)&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 3030-3037</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The effects which follow too constant and intense a concentration upon evil are always disastrous. Those who crusade, not for God in themselves, but against the devil in others, never succeed in making the world better, but leave it either as it was, or sometimes even perceptibly worse than it was, before the crusade began. By thinking primarily of evil we tend, however excellent our intentions, to create occasions for evil to manifest itself.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 3061-3064</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Today it is everywhere self-evident that we are on the side of Light, they on the side of Darkness. And being on the side of Darkness, they deserve to be punished and must be liquidated (since our divinity justifies everything) by the most fiendish means at our disposal. By idolatrously worshiping ourselves as Ormuzd, and by regarding the other fellow as Ahriman, the Principle of Evil, we of the twentieth century are doing our best to guarantee the triumph of diabolism in our time.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 3066-3069</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;For the moment, let us place ourselves in the intellectual position of the exorcists and their contemporaries. Accepting as valid the Church’s criteria of possession, let us examine the evidence on which the nuns were pronounced to be demoniacs and the parson, a sorcerer.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 3097-3099</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Maitland’s father had told him of a Scottish peasant woman, through whose mouth a demon had corrected the bad Latin of a Presbyterian minister, and the young man had consequently grown up with an a priori belief in possession.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 3152-3154</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;From all this it must be evident that if, as the Roman Church maintained, ESP phenomena and PK effects are the hallmark of diabolic possession (or, alternatively, are extraordinary graces), then the Ursulines of Loudun were merely hysterics who had fallen into the hands, not of the fiend, not of the living God, but of a crew of exorcists, all superstitious, all hungry for publicity, and some deliberately dishonest and consciously malevolent.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 3245-3248</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The nuns, they asserted, must be possessed by devils; for how, otherwise, could one account for the shamelessness of their actions, the smut and irreligion of their conversation? “In what school of rakes and atheists,” asks Father Tranquille, “have they learned to spew forth such blasphemies and obscenities?” And with a touch almost of boastfulness, de Nion assures us that the good sisters “made use of expressions so filthy as to shame the most debauched of men, while their acts, both in exposing themselves and in inviting lewd behavior from those present, would have astounded the inhabitants of the lowest brothel in the country.”* As for their oaths and blasphemies—these were “so unheard of that they could not have suggested themselves to a merely human mind.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 3249-3255</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The ushers called for silence. In vain. The sobbing was uncontrollable. Laubardemont was greatly disturbed. Nothing was going according to plan. Better than anyone else he must have known that Grandier was not guilty of the crimes for which he was to be tortured and burned alive. And yet, in some sublimely Pickwickian sense, the parson was a sorcerer. On the basis of a thousand pages of worthless evidence, thirteen hireling judges had said so. Therefore, though certainly false, it must somehow be true. Now, by all the rules of the game, Grandier should be spending his last hours in despair and rebellion, cursing the devil who had ensnared him and the God who was sending him to hell. Instead of which, the scoundrel was talking like a good Catholic and giving the most touching, the most heart-rending example of Christian resignation. The thing was insufferable. And what would His Eminence say, when he heard that the only result of this carefully stage-managed ceremony had been to convince the spectators that the parson was innocent? There was only one thing to do, and Laubardemont, who was a man of decision, promptly did it. “Clear the court,” he ordered.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 3568-3576</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Our ancestors invented the rack and the iron maiden, the boot and the water torture; but in the subtler arts of breaking the will and reducing the human being to subhumanity, they still had much to learn. In a sense, it may be, they did not even wish to learn these things. They had been brought up in a religion which taught that the will is free, the soul immortal; and they acted upon these beliefs even in relation to their enemies.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 3609-3612</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;For the totalitarians of our more enlightened century, there is no soul and no Creator; there is merely a lump of physiological raw material molded by conditioned reflexes and social pressures into what, by courtesy, is still called a human being. This product of the man-made environment is without intrinsic significance and possesses no rights to self-determination. It exists for Society and must conform to the Collective Will. In practice, of course, Society is nothing but the national State, and as a matter of brute fact, the Collective Will is merely the dictator’s will-to-power, sometimes mitigated, sometimes distorted to the verge of lunacy, by some pseudoscientific theory of what, in the gorgeous future, will be good for an actuarial abstraction labeled “Humanity.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 3616-3621</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;[…] remembered those Latin lessons and his abandonment of the desperately weeping girl—and partly out of a fear lest the spectacle of their triumph might move him to bitterness and make him forget that God was even here, even now, Grandier dropped his eyes. A hand touched him on the shoulder. It was La Grange, the captain of the guard, who had come to ask the parson’s forgiveness&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 3779-3782</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The treasury ceased to pay the salary of the surviving exorcists, who were all recalled to their various houses. Left to themselves such devils as remained soon took their leave. After six years of incessant struggle, the Church Militant gave up the fight. Its enemies promptly disappeared. The long orgy was at an end. If there had been no exorcists, it would never have begun.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 4448-4450</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The charm of history and its enigmatic lesson consist in the fact that, from age to age, nothing changes and yet everything is completely different. In the personages of other times and alien cultures we recognize our all too human selves and yet are aware, as we do so, that the frame of reference within which we do our living has changed, since their day, out of all recognition, that propositions which seemed axiomatic then are now untenable and that what we regard as the most self-evident postulates could not, at an earlier period, find entrance into even the most boldly speculative mind. But however great, however important for thought and technology, for social organization and behavior, the differences between then and now are always peripheral.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 4457-4462</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;“Do not hunt after the truth,” advises one of the Zen masters, “only cease to cherish opinions.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 4899-4900</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;To be mad with lucidity and in complete possession of one’s intellectual faculties—this, surely, must be one of the most terrible of experiences. Unimpaired, Surin’s reason looked on helplessly, while his imagination, his emotions and his autonomic nervous system comported themselves like an alliance of criminal maniacs, bent on his destruction. It was a struggle, in the last analysis, between the active person and the victim of suggestion, between Surin the realist, doing his best to cope with actual facts, and Surin the verbalist, converting words into hideous pseudo-realities, in regard to which it was only logical to feel terror and despair.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 5152-5157</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Far more dangerous than crimes of passion are the crimes of idealism—the crimes which are instigated, fostered and moralized by hallowed words. Such crimes are planned when the pulse is normal and committed in cold blood and with unwavering perseverance over a long course of years. In the past, the words which dictated the crimes of idealism were predominantly religious; now they are predominantly political. The dogmas are no longer metaphysical, but positivistic and ideological. The only things that remain unchanged are the idolatrous superstition of those who swallow the dogmas, and the systematic madness, the diabolic ferocity, with which they act upon their beliefs.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 5173-5179</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The fundamental human problem is ecological: men must learn how to live with the cosmos on all its levels, from the material to the spiritual. As a race, we have to discover how a huge and rapidly increasing population can go on existing satisfactorily on a planet of limited size and possessed of resources, many of which are wasting assets that can never be renewed.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 5180-5183</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Against excessive sexuality, as against excessive drug-taking, societies seem to be able to protect themselves with some degree of success. Their defense against crowd-delirium and its often disastrous consequences is, in all too many cases, far less adequate. The professional moralists who inveigh against drunkenness are strangely silent about the equally disgusting vice of herd-intoxication—of downward self-transcendence into subhumanity by the process of getting together in a mob.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 5408-5411</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Individually and in the co-ordinated and purposive groups which constitute a healthy society, men and women display a certain capacity for rational thought and free choice in the light of ethical principles. Herded into mobs, the same men and women behave as though they possessed neither reason nor free will. Crowd-intoxication reduces them to a condition of infrapersonal and antisocial irresponsibility. Drugged by the mysterious poison which every excited herd secretes, they fall into a state of heightened suggestibility, resembling that which follows an injection of sodium amytal or the induction, by whatever means, of a light hypnotic trance. While in this state they will believe any nonsense that may be bawled at them, will act upon any command or exhortation, however senseless, mad or criminal.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 5422-5427</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;That is why men in authority—the priests and the rulers of peoples—have never unequivocally proclaimed the immorality of this form of downward self-transcendence. True, crowd-delirium evoked by members of the opposition and in the name of heretical principles has everywhere been denounced by those in power. But crowd-delirium aroused by government agents, crowd-delirium in the name of orthodoxy, is an entirely different matter. In all cases where it can be made to serve the interests of the men controlling church and state, downward self-transcendence by means of herd-intoxication is treated as something legitimate, and even highly desirable.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 5429-5433</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Religious and political ceremonials are welcomed by the masses as opportunities for getting drunk on herd-poison, and by their rulers as opportunities for planting suggestions in minds which have momentarily ceased to be capable of reason or free will.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 5440-5442</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;“Patriotism,” as a great patriot concluded on the eve of her execution by her country’s enemies, “is not enough.” Neither is socialism, nor communism, nor capitalism; neither is art, nor science, nor public order, nor any given religion or church. All these are indispensable, but none of them is enough. Civilization demands from the individual devoted self-identification with the highest of human causes. But if this self-identification with what is human is not accompanied by a conscious and consistent effort to achieve upward self-transcendence into the universal life of the Spirit, the goods achieved will always be mingled with counterbalancing evils.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 5578-5582</div></div>      </div>
      </div>
        <div class="footer">
    <div class="footer-data"><div class="footer-links"><ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/contact.php" title="">Contact</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/support.php" title="">Support</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/privacy.php" title="">Privacy</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/rights.php" title="">Rights</a></li></ul></div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="copyright">Copyright (c) 1999-2026 earthli.com. All Rights Reserved.</div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="versions">Powered by <ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore/app_news.php">earthli News 3.7</a></li><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore" title="">earthli WebCore&trade; 3.7</a></li></ul></div></div>    </div>
      </div>
  </div>  </body>
</html>
]]>
  </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
      <title type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[The Doors of Perception and Heaven and Hell by Aldous Huxley (1954/1956) (read in 2017)]]>
  </title>
    <id>https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3440</id>
    <link href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3440"/>
    <updated>2017-10-02T21:33:13+02:00</updated>
    <author>
        <name type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[Marco von Ballmoos]]>
  </name>
      <uri>https://earthli.com/users/marco</uri>
    </author>
      <summary type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<blockquote class="quote abstract "><div>Disclaimer: these are notes I took while reading this book. They include citations I found interesting or enlightening or particularly well-written. In some cases, I&rsquo;ve pointed out which of these applies to which citation; in others, I have not. Any benefit you gain from reading these notes is... [<a class="complete-text-link" href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3440">More</a>]</div></blockquote>]]>
  </summary>
      <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<html lang="en">
  <head>
    <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/themes/ice.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/fonts/raleway.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/core/medium.css">
  </head>
  <body>
<div class="style-controls">  <div class="page">
    <div class="page-body">
<div class="info-box-top">
<p>
Published by <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_user.php?name=marco" title="Marco von Ballmoos" class="visible">marco</a> on <span class="date-time">2. Oct 2017 21:33:13 (GMT-5)</span>
</p>
</div>
      <div class="text-flow wide">
  <blockquote class="quote abstract "><div>Disclaimer: these are notes I took while reading this book. They include citations I found interesting or enlightening or particularly well-written. In some cases, I&rsquo;ve pointed out which of these applies to which citation; in others, I have not. Any benefit you gain from reading these notes is purely incidental to the purpose they serve of reminding me what I once read. Please see Wikipedia for a summary if I&rsquo;ve failed to provide one sufficient for your purposes. If my notes serve to trigger an interest in this book, then I&rsquo;m happy for you.</div></blockquote><p>This is a book in two parts. The first is called <em>The Doors of Perception</em> and is an analysis of one of Huxley&rsquo;s mescaline trips. It interweaves nigh-painfully evocative descriptions of what he saw on his 8-hour trip with a history of visions and visionaries. The discussion includes an examination of social implications of various intoxicants and their relative efficacy in providing escape, insight and advancement.</p>
<p>The second book <em>Heaven and Hell</em> is a discussion of the thesis that much religious symbology is anchored in an effort to replicate/evoke/commemorate/trigger the majestic preternatural visions experienced on mescaline, peyote or sensory or nourishment deprivation. He discusses the relative facility of some artwork to transport individuals to other, more-visionary inner places. The efficacy of art to transport is relative to the age within which it was observed: modern society&rsquo;s surfeit of color and distraction serves to dampen the power of artwork that would otherwise be more easily able to induce visions and insight.</p>
<p>While he does not offer a scientific or empirical base for his thoughts, his rumination on their ineffability—and his attempts to make it more effable with some sort of framework, a model—is very interesting. He seeks not to diminish religion but neither does he lend credence to any of their models as the one true way. The subconscious is to be mined for insight—and insight exists outside of provability. His model is of the <em>antipodes</em> of the mind, places separate from the conscious and even most of the subconscious mind, where a clearer, unfiltered lens on reality exists. Or, at least, seems to exist. At that level of abstraction, it doesn&rsquo;t matter whether it&rsquo;s &ldquo;real&rdquo; in a physical or measurable sense, but that it influences your everyday consciousness and makes you a more observant, peaceful and reasonable person.</p>
<p>These books, like <em>The Devils of Loudon</em>, are an investigation by a prodigiously learned, patient, curious, intelligent and open mind into difficult but overwhelmingly interesting topics for which there are no single answers, no roadmaps to enlightenment. The book includes voluminous appendices that comprise more than 1/3 of its pages. It&rsquo;s not a self-help book. It&rsquo;s not a scientific treatise. It&rsquo;s a notebook of observations written by a master. Recommended.</p>
<h2>Citations</h2><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Reflecting on my experience, I find myself agreeing with the eminent Cambridge philosopher, Dr. C. D. Broad, “that we should do well to consider much more seriously than we have hitherto been inclined to do the type of theory which Bergson put forward in connection with memory and sense perception. The suggestion is that the function of the brain and nervous system and sense organs is in the main eliminative and not productive. Each person is at each moment capable of remembering all that has ever happened to him and of perceiving everything that is happening everywhere in the universe. The function of the brain and nervous system is to protect us from being overwhelmed and confused by this mass of largely useless and irrelevant knowledge, by shutting out most of what we should otherwise perceive or remember at any moment, and leaving only that very small and special selection which is likely to be practically useful.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 154-161</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Every individual is at once the beneficiary and the victim of the linguistic tradition into which he has been born—the beneficiary inasmuch as language gives access to the accumulated records of other people’s experience, the victim in so far as it confirms him in the belief that reduced awareness is the only awareness and as it bedevils his sense of reality, so that he is all too apt to take his concepts for data, his words for actual things.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 165-168</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Most people, most of the time, know only what comes through the reducing valve and is consecrated as genuinely real by the local language.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 170-171</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Visual impressions are greatly intensified and the eye recovers some of the perceptual innocence of childhood, when the sensum was not immediately and automatically subordinated to the concept.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 183-184</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;It was on Van Gogh, and the picture at which the book opened was “The Chair”—that astounding portrait of a Ding an Sich, which the mad painter saw, with a kind of adoring terror, and tried to render on his canvas. But it was a task to which the power even of genius proved wholly inadequate. The chair Van Gogh had seen was obviously the same in essence as the chair I had seen. But, though incomparably more real than the chairs of ordinary perception, the chair in his picture remained no more than an unusually expressive symbol of the fact.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 215-219</div></div><p>Giacometti went down this road as well.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Poring over Judith’s skirts, there in the World’s Biggest Drug Store, I knew that Botticelli—and not Botticelli alone, but many others too—had looked at draperies with the same transfigured and transfiguring eyes as had been mine that morning. They had seen the Istigkeit, the Allness and Infinity of folded cloth and had done their best to render it in paint or stone. Necessarily, of course, without success. For the glory and the wonder of pure existence belong to another order, beyond the power of even the highest art to express.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 270-274</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The untalented visionary may perceive an inner reality no less tremendous, beautiful and significant than the world beheld by Blake; but he lacks altogether the ability to express, in literary or plastic symbols, what he has seen.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 395-396</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;As recently as three hundred years ago an expression of thoroughgoing world denial and even world condemnation was both orthodox and comprehensible. “We should feel wonder at nothing at all in Nature except only the Incarnation of Christ.” In the seventeenth century, Lallemant’s phrase seemed to make sense. Today it has the ring of madness.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 406-408</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;For what seemed an immensely long time I gazed without knowing, even without wishing to know, what it was that confronted me. At any other time I would have seen a chair barred with alternate light and shade. Today the percept had swallowed up the concept. I was so completely absorbed in looking, so thunderstruck by what I actually saw, that I could not be aware of anything else. Garden furniture, laths, sunlight, shadow—these were no more than names and notions, mere verbalizations, for utilitarian or scientific purposes, after the event. The event was this succession of azure furnace doors separated by gulfs of unfathomable gentian. It was inexpressibly wonderful, wonderful to the point, almost, of being terrifying. And suddenly I had an inkling of what it must feel like to be mad. Schizophrenia has its heavens as well as its hells and purgatories.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 470-476</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The schizophrenic is a soul not merely unregenerate, but desperately sick into the bargain. His sickness consists in the inability to take refuge from inner and outer reality (as the sane person habitually does) in the homemade universe of common sense—the strictly human world of useful notions, shared symbols and socially acceptable conventions.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 498-500</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Here, in spite of the peculiar hideousness of the architecture, there were renewals of transcendental otherness, hints of the morning’s heaven. Brick chimneys and green composition roofs glowed in the sunshine, like fragments of the New Jerusalem. And all at once I saw what Guardi had seen and (with what incomparable skill) had so often rendered in his paintings—a stucco wall with a shadow slanting across it, blank but unforgettably beautiful, empty but charged with all the meaning and the mystery of existence. The revelation dawned and was gone again within a fraction of a second.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 547-551</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;That humanity at large will ever be able to dispense with Artificial Paradises seems very unlikely. Most men and women lead lives at the worst so painful, at the best so monotonous, poor and limited that the urge to escape, the longing to transcend themselves if only for a few moments, is and has always been one of the principal appetites of the soul.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 558-560</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;We can never dispense with language and the other symbol systems; for it is by means of them, and only by their means, that we have raised ourselves above the brutes, to the level of human beings. But we can easily become the victims as well as the beneficiaries of these systems. We must learn how to handle words effectively; but at the same time we must preserve and, if necessary, intensify our ability to look at the world directly and not through that half opaque medium of concepts, which distorts every given fact into the all too familiar likeness of some generic label or explanatory abstraction.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 670-675</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;About the physiological effects of mescalin we know a little. Probably (for we are not yet certain) it interferes with the enzyme system that regulates cerebral functioning. By doing so it lowers the efficiency of the brain as an instrument for focusing the mind on the problems of life on the surface of our planet. This lowering of what may be called the biological efficiency of the brain seems to permit the entry into consciousness of certain classes of mental events, which are normally excluded, because they possess no survival value.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 759-763</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;“I was sitting on the seashore, half listening to a friend arguing violently about something which merely bored me. Unconsciously to myself, I looked at a film of sand I had picked up on my hand, when I suddenly saw the exquisite beauty of every little grain of it; instead of being dull, I saw that each particle was made up on a perfect geometrical pattern, with sharp angles, from each of which a brilliant shaft of light was reflected, while each tiny crystal shone like a rainbow…. The rays crossed and recrossed, making exquisite patterns of such beauty that they left me breathless…. Then, suddenly, my consciousness was lighted up from within and I saw in a vivid way how the whole universe was made up of particles of material which, no matter how dull and lifeless they might seem, were nevertheless filled with this intense and vital beauty. For a second or two the whole world appeared as a blaze of glory. When it died down, it left me with something I have never forgotten and which constantly reminds me of the beauty locked up in every minute speck of material around us.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 828-836</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Thanks to glass, Paolo Uccello could design a circular jewel thirteen feet in diameter—his great window of the Resurrection, perhaps the most extraordinary single work of vision-inducing art ever produced.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 966-967</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Familiarity breeds indifference. We have seen too much pure, bright color at Woolworth’s to find it intrinsically transporting. And here we may note that, by its amazing capacity to give us too much of the best things, modern technology has tended to devaluate the traditional vision-inducing materials.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 1028-1030</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;With the development of chiaroscuro, in the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries, night came out of the background and installed itself within the picture, which became the scene of a kind of Manichean struggle between Light and Darkness. At the time they were painted these works must have possessed a real transporting power. To us, who have seen altogether too much of this kind of thing, most of them seem merely theatrical. But a few still retain their magic. There is Caravaggio’s “Entombment,” for example; there are a dozen magical paintings by Georges de Latour;* there are all those visionary Rembrandts where the lights have the intensity and significance of light at the mind’s antipodes, where the darks are full of rich potentialities waiting their turn to become actual, to make themselves glowingly present to our consciousness.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 1052-1058</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The meditating philosopher sits there in his island of inner illumination; and at the opposite end of the symbolic chamber, in another, rosier island, an old woman crouches before the hearth. The firelight touches and transfigures her face, and we see, concretely illustrated, the impossible paradox and supreme truth—that perception is (or at least can be, ought to be) the same as Revelation,&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 1063-1066</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;There hangs in the Louvre a “Méditation du Philosophe,” whose symbolical subject matter is nothing more nor less than the human mind, with its teeming darknesses, its moments of intellectual and visionary illumination, its mysterious stairways winding downward and upward into the unknown. The meditating philosopher sits there in his island of inner illumination; and at the opposite end of the symbolic chamber, in another, rosier island, an old woman crouches before the hearth. The firelight touches and transfigures her face, and we see, concretely illustrated, the impossible paradox and supreme truth—that perception is (or at least can be, ought to be) the same as Revelation, that Reality shines out of every appearance, that the One is totally, infinitely present in all particulars.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 1061-1067</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Many schizophrenics have their times of heavenly happiness; but the fact that (unlike the mescalin taker) they do not know when, if ever, they will be permitted to return to the reassuring banality of everyday experience causes even heaven to seem appalling. But for those who, for whatever reason, are appalled, heaven turns into hell, bliss into horror, the Clear Light into the hateful glare of the land of lit-upness.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 1249-1252</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;For the living, the doors of heaven, hell and limbo are opened, not by “massy keys of metals twain,” but by the presence in the blood of one set of chemical compounds and the absence of another set. The shadow world inhabited by some schizophrenics and neurotics closely resembles the world of the dead, as described in some of the earlier religious traditions.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 1601-1603</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;To both, again, all is significant, but negatively significant, so that every event is utterly pointless, every object intensely unreal,&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 1640-1641</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;all is significant, but negatively significant, so that every event is utterly pointless, every object intensely unreal, every self-styled human being a clockwork dummy, grotesquely going through the motions of work and play, of loving, hating, thinking, of being eloquent, heroic, saintly, what you will—the robots are nothing if not versatile.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 1640-1642</div></div>      </div>
      </div>
        <div class="footer">
    <div class="footer-data"><div class="footer-links"><ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/contact.php" title="">Contact</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/support.php" title="">Support</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/privacy.php" title="">Privacy</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/rights.php" title="">Rights</a></li></ul></div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="copyright">Copyright (c) 1999-2026 earthli.com. All Rights Reserved.</div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="versions">Powered by <ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore/app_news.php">earthli News 3.7</a></li><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore" title="">earthli WebCore&trade; 3.7</a></li></ul></div></div>    </div>
      </div>
  </div>  </body>
</html>
]]>
  </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
      <title type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[October: The Story of the Russian Revolution by China Miéville (2017) (read in 2017)]]>
  </title>
    <id>https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3439</id>
    <link href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3439"/>
    <updated>2017-10-02T21:00:12+02:00</updated>
    <author>
        <name type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[Marco von Ballmoos]]>
  </name>
      <uri>https://earthli.com/users/marco</uri>
    </author>
      <summary type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<blockquote class="quote abstract "><div>Disclaimer: these are notes I took while reading this book. They include citations I found interesting or enlightening or particularly well-written. In some cases, I&rsquo;ve pointed out which of these applies to which citation; in others, I have not. Any benefit you gain from reading these notes is... [<a class="complete-text-link" href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3439">More</a>]</div></blockquote>]]>
  </summary>
      <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<html lang="en">
  <head>
    <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/themes/ice.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/fonts/raleway.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/core/medium.css">
  </head>
  <body>
<div class="style-controls">  <div class="page">
    <div class="page-body">
<div class="info-box-top">
<p>
Published by <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_user.php?name=marco" title="Marco von Ballmoos" class="visible">marco</a> on <span class="date-time">2. Oct 2017 21:00:12 (GMT-5)</span>
</p>
</div>
      <div class="text-flow wide">
  <blockquote class="quote abstract "><div>Disclaimer: these are notes I took while reading this book. They include citations I found interesting or enlightening or particularly well-written. In some cases, I&rsquo;ve pointed out which of these applies to which citation; in others, I have not. Any benefit you gain from reading these notes is purely incidental to the purpose they serve of reminding me what I once read. Please see Wikipedia for a summary if I&rsquo;ve failed to provide one sufficient for your purposes. If my notes serve to trigger an interest in this book, then I&rsquo;m happy for you.</div></blockquote><p>This is a thoroughly researched retelling of the Russian revolution, as written by a master of Science Fiction and Fantasy. It takes the reader from February 1917 to October/November 2017. There follows a bit of an epilogue, sketching the following decades roughly, but that&rsquo;s not the focus of the book.</p>
<p>The focus is on how the initial coup of Nicholas II transformed over nearly a year to the Bolshevik revolution. The summer sees a cavalcade of famous names, each placed in history: Lenin, Trotsky, Maslov, Kolchak, Semenov, Stalin, Sukhanov … the list goes on an on.</p>
<p>Allegiances whipsaw, bolsheviks gain in power over the summer, the second revolution in October was a near-inevitability in hindsight. A very interesting and very well-written unsnarling of an incredibly complicated and singularly important sequence of events. The hopefulness and solidarity of the socialists shines through at nearly every moment. They would, in the end, win for a only a few shining months before the clouds of totalitarianism descended. Highly recommended.</p>
<h2>Citations</h2><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;In its wake come more reading circles, cells of agitators, gatherings of the variously like-minded, aghast at a world of ruthless, exploitative capital and the subordination of need to profit. The future for which the Marxists yearn, communism, is as absurd to their detractors as any peasant’s Belovode. It is rarely distinctly outlined, but they know it beckons beyond private property and its violence, beyond exploitation and alienation, to a world where technology reduces labour, the better for humanity to flourish. ‘The true realm of freedom’, in Marx’s words: ‘the development of human powers as an end in itself’. This is what they want.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 182-187</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The Petrograd police blocked the bridges. But the gods of weather showed solidarity in the form of this brutal winter. The streets were lined with thick snowpiles, and the great Neva itself remained frozen. The demonstrators descended in their thousands from the embankments onto the ice. They walked across the face of the waters.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 675-677</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Alongside such appeals to the war’s new legitimacy, the Coalition Government knew that its international standing, certainly among the Allies, was heavily dependent on whether it was seen to be doing its bit to win the war – and doing so on those Allies’ decidedly unsocialist terms. Some were clear-sighted that this was a contradiction, and, continuing to laud the anti-imperialist necessity of the war’s continuation, they were entirely cynical.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 2119-2122</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Either way, it is a curio of the moment that hard-left advocates of ‘all power to the soviets’ were delegated by a soviet opponent to defend the Soviet currently arguing furiously against taking the power they wanted it to take.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 2880-2882</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Then came a sadism so startling it stunned the left. ‘The bony hand of hunger and national destitution will seize by the throat the friends of the people.’ Those ‘friends of the people’ he dreamed into the grasp of predatory skeletal fingers were socialists.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 3167-3169</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Lenin suggested Trotsky for commissar of the interior. But Trotsky foresaw that enemies on the right would attack him – as a Jew. ‘Of what importance are such trifles?’ Lenin snapped. ‘There are still a good many fools left,’ Trotsky replied. ‘Surely we don’t keep step with fools?’ ‘Sometimes’, said Trotsky, ‘one has to make some allowance for stupidity. Why create additional complications at the outset?’&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 4457-4462</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;There, their world collapsing, the sullen embers of the Provisional Government still glowed.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 4514-4515</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;With all the seriousness in the world, like burnt-out matches telling grim stories of the conflagration they will soon start, the ashes of Russia’s Provisional Government debated which of them to make dictator.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 4520-4522</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The minister Semion Maslov of the Right SRs screamed down the phone line to a Duma representative, who relayed his words to the hushed house. ‘The democracy sent us into the Provisional Government: we didn’t want the appointments, but we went. Yet now … when we are being shot, we are not supported … Of course we will die. But my final words will be: “Contempt and damnation to the democracy which knew how to appoint us but was unable to defend us.”’&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 4590-4593</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;When the cheering subsided, Trotsky himself rose to respond to Martov. ‘A rising of the masses of the people requires no justification,’ he said. ‘What has happened is an insurrection, and not a conspiracy. We hardened the revolutionary energy of the Petersburg workers and soldiers. We openly forged the will of the masses for an insurrection, and not a conspiracy. The masses of the people followed our banner and our insurrection was victorious. And now we are told: renounce your victory, make concessions, compromise. With whom? I ask: with whom ought we to compromise? With those wretched groups which have left us or who are making this proposal? But after all we’ve had a full view of them. No one in Russia is with them any longer. A compromise is supposed to be made, as between two equal sides, by the millions of workers and peasants represented in this congress, whom they are ready, not for the first time or the last, to barter away as the bourgeoisie sees fit. No, here no compromise is possible. To those who have left and to those who tell us to do this we must say: you are miserable bankrupts, your role is played out. Go where you ought to go: into the dustbin of history!’&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 4668-4677</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Russia gains peace but loses swathes of land and population, some of its most fertile regions, and vast industrial and financial resources. In these vacated territories, the Central Powers install counter-revolutionary puppet regimes.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 4829-4830</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;David Francis, the American ambassador to Russia, writes of his concern that ‘if these damned Bolsheviks are permitted to remain in control of the country it will not only be lost to its devoted people but Bolshevik rule will undermine all governments and be a menace to society itself’.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 4852-4854</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Churchill is particularly obsessed with the ‘nameless beast’, the ‘foul baboonery of Bolshevism’, and perfectly explicit that it is his greatest enemy. ‘Of all the tyrannies in history, the Bolshevist tyranny is the worst, the most destructive, and the most degrading,’ he declares in 1919. ‘It is sheer humbug to pretend that it is not far worse than German militarism.’ As the war ends, he publicises his intention to ‘Kill the Bolshie, Kiss the Hun’.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 4854-4858</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The Allies pour troops into Russia, screwing down an embargo, stopping food from reaching the starving population of Soviet Russia. And they funnel funds to the Whites, no matter how unsavoury – supporting a dictatorship under Alexander Kolchak, and regarding Grigory Semenov, whose Cossack forces unleash a reign of terror in Siberia, as, in the words of one American observer, ‘tolerably severe’.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 4858-4861</div></div><p>Plus ça change.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;And there is no doubt that its reach and depth expand beyond control; that some agents of the Cheka, the political police, seduced by personal power, sadism or the degradation of the moment, are thugs and murderers unconstrained by political conviction and wielding new authority. There are no shortage of testimonials as to their dreadful acts.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 4870-4873</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Under such unrelenting pressures, these are months and years of unspeakable barbarity and suffering, starvation, mass death, the near-total collapse of industry and culture, of banditry, pogroms, torture and cannibalism&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 4868-4870</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Major General William Graves, who commanded US forces in Siberia, considers himself ‘well on the side of safety when I say that the anti-Bolsheviks killed one hundred people in Eastern Siberia, to every one killed by the Bolsheviks’.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 4877-4878</div></div><p>Despite this, the US would support the other, more-evil side. And then they&rsquo;d blame bolshevism when it fails to flourish <em>despite</em> their onslaught.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Threats against the regime multiply, and Stalin consolidates his rule. As crisis grips the world economy, he inaugurates the ‘great change’. ‘The tempo must not be reduced!’ he announces in 1931. This is his first Five-Year Plan. ‘We are fifty or 100 years behind the advanced countries. We must make good this distance in ten years. Either we do it or they crush us.’&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 4911-4914</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Lenin rather startlingly allows as ‘incontrovertible’ that Russia had not been ‘ready’ for revolution. He wonders pugnaciously, however, whether a people ‘influenced by the hopelessness of its situation’ could be blamed&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 4935-4937</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;In his short piece ‘Our Revolution’, written in January 1923 in response to Sukhanov’s memoir, Lenin rather startlingly allows as ‘incontrovertible’ that Russia had not been ‘ready’ for revolution. He wonders pugnaciously, however, whether a people ‘influenced by the hopelessness of its situation’ could be blamed for ‘fling[ing] itself into a struggle that would offer it at least some chance of securing conditions for the further development of civilisation that were somewhat unusual’. It is not absurd to argue that the ground-down of Russia had no real choice but to act, on the chance that in so doing they might alter the very parameters of the situation. That things might thereby improve.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 4934-4940</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The party’s shift after Lenin’s death, from that plaintive, embattled sense that there had been little alternative but to strive in imperfect conditions, to the later bad hope of Socialism in One Country, is a baleful result of recasting necessity as virtue.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 4940-4942</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;It is not for nostalgia’s sake that the strange story of the first socialist revolution in history deserves celebration. The standard of October declares that things changed once, and they might do so again.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 4950-4952</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Those who count themselves on the side of the revolution must engage with these failures and crimes. To do otherwise is to fall into apologia, special pleading, hagiography – and to run the risk of repeating such mistakes. It is not for nostalgia’s sake that the strange story of the first socialist revolution in history deserves celebration. The standard of October declares that things changed once, and they might do so again.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 4948-4952</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;October, for an instant, brings a new kind of power. Fleetingly, there is a shift towards workers’ control of production and the rights of peasants to the land. Equal rights for men and women in work and in marriage, the right to divorce, maternity support. The decriminalisation of homosexuality, 100 years ago. Moves towards national self-determination. Free and universal education, the expansion of literacy. And with literacy comes a cultural explosion, a thirst to learn, the mushrooming of universities and lecture series and adult schools. A change in the soul, as Lunacharsky might put it, as much as in the factory. And though those moments are snuffed out, reversed, become bleak jokes and memories all too soon, it might have been otherwise.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 4952-4957</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The revolutionaries want a new country in a new world, one they cannot see but believe they can build.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 4958-4959</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Twilight, even remembered twilight, is better than no light at all. It would be equally absurd to say that there is nothing we can learn from the revolution. To deny that the sumerki of October can be ours, and that it need not always be followed by night.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 4964-4966</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;By the Forest Shacks are the points, the switches onto hidden tracks through wilder history. The question for history is not only who should be driving the engine, but where. The Prokopoviches have something to fear, and they police these suspect, illegal branch lines, all the while insisting they do not exist. Onto such tracks the revolutionaries divert their train, with its contraband cargo, unregisterable, supernumerary, powering for a horizon, an edge as far away as ever and yet careering closer. Or so it looks from the liberated train, in liberty’s dim light.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 4995-5000</div></div><p>Two books in the list of references that looked interesting:</p>
<ul>
<li>Leon Trotsky, History of the Russian Revolution (1930). Justly celebrated as a towering, vivid, historically vital work.</li>
<li>Tsuyoshi Hasegawa, The February Revolution, Petrograd: 1917 (1981). Outstanding. The definitive telling of the early days of 1917.</li></ul>      </div>
      </div>
        <div class="footer">
    <div class="footer-data"><div class="footer-links"><ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/contact.php" title="">Contact</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/support.php" title="">Support</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/privacy.php" title="">Privacy</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/rights.php" title="">Rights</a></li></ul></div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="copyright">Copyright (c) 1999-2026 earthli.com. All Rights Reserved.</div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="versions">Powered by <ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore/app_news.php">earthli News 3.7</a></li><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore" title="">earthli WebCore&trade; 3.7</a></li></ul></div></div>    </div>
      </div>
  </div>  </body>
</html>
]]>
  </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
      <title type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[The Doors of Perception and Heaven and Hell by Aldous Huxley (1954) (read in 2017)]]>
  </title>
    <id>https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3437</id>
    <link href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3437"/>
    <updated>2017-08-13T23:09:04+02:00</updated>
    <author>
        <name type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[Marco von Ballmoos]]>
  </name>
      <uri>https://earthli.com/users/marco</uri>
    </author>
      <summary type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<blockquote class="quote abstract "><div>Disclaimer: these are notes I took while reading this book. They include citations I found interesting or enlightening or particularly well-written. In some cases, I&rsquo;ve pointed out which of these applies to which citation; in others, I have not. Any benefit you gain from reading these notes is... [<a class="complete-text-link" href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3437">More</a>]</div></blockquote>]]>
  </summary>
      <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<html lang="en">
  <head>
    <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/themes/ice.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/fonts/raleway.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/core/medium.css">
  </head>
  <body>
<div class="style-controls">  <div class="page">
    <div class="page-body">
<div class="info-box-top">
<p>
Published by <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_user.php?name=marco" title="Marco von Ballmoos" class="visible">marco</a> on <span class="date-time">13. Aug 2017 23:09:04 (GMT-5)</span>
</p>
</div>
      <div class="text-flow wide">
  <blockquote class="quote abstract "><div>Disclaimer: these are notes I took while reading this book. They include citations I found interesting or enlightening or particularly well-written. In some cases, I&rsquo;ve pointed out which of these applies to which citation; in others, I have not. Any benefit you gain from reading these notes is purely incidental to the purpose they serve of reminding me what I once read. Please see Wikipedia for a summary if I&rsquo;ve failed to provide one sufficient for your purposes. If my notes serve to trigger an interest in this book, then I&rsquo;m happy for you.</div></blockquote><p>This is a book in two parts. The first is called <em>The Doors of Perception</em> and is an analysis of one of Huxley&rsquo;s mescaline trips. It interweaves nigh-painfully evocative descriptions of what he saw on his 8-hour trip with a history of visions and visionaries. The discussion includes an examination of social implications of various intoxicants and their relative efficacy in providing escape, insight and advancement.</p>
<p>The second <em>Heaven and Hell</em> is a discussion of the thesis that much religious symbology is anchored in an effort to replicate/evoke/commemorate/trigger the majestic preternatural visions experienced on mescaline, peyote or sensory or nourishment deprivation. He discusses the relative facility of some artwork to transport individuals to other, more-visionary inner places. The efficacy of art to transport is relative to the the age within which it was observed: modern society&rsquo;s surfeit of color and distraction serves to dampen the power of artwork that would otherwise be more easily able to induce visions and insight.</p>
<p>While he does not offer a scientific or empirical base for his thoughts, his rumination on their ineffability—and his attempts to make it more effable with some sort of framework, a model—is very interesting. He seeks not to diminish religion but neither does he lend credence to any of their models as the one true way. The subconscious is to be mined for insight—and insight exists outside of provability. His model is of the <em>antipodes</em> of the mind, places separate from the conscious and even most of the subconscious mind, where a clearer, unfiltered lens on reality exists. Or, at least, seems to exist. At that level of abstraction, it doesn&rsquo;t matter whether it&rsquo;s &ldquo;real&rdquo; in a physical or measurable sense, but that it influences your everyday consciousness and makes you a more observant, peaceful and reasonable person.</p>
<p>These books, like <em>The Devils of Loudon</em> are an investigation by a prodigiously learned, patient, curious, intelligent and open mind into difficult but overwhelmingly interesting topics for which there are no single answers, no roadmaps to enlightenment. The book includes voluminous appendices that comprise more than 1/3 of its pages. It&rsquo;s not a self-help book. It&rsquo;s not a scientific treatise. It&rsquo;s a notebook of observations written by a master. Recommended.</p>
<h2>Citations</h2><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Reflecting on my experience, I find myself agreeing with the eminent Cambridge philosopher, Dr. C. D. Broad, “that we should do well to consider much more seriously than we have hitherto been inclined to do the type of theory which Bergson put forward in connection with memory and sense perception. The suggestion is that the function of the brain and nervous system and sense organs is in the main eliminative and not productive. Each person is at each moment capable of remembering all that has ever happened to him and of perceiving everything that is happening everywhere in the universe. The function of the brain and nervous system is to protect us from being overwhelmed and confused by this mass of largely useless and irrelevant knowledge, by shutting out most of what we should otherwise perceive or remember at any moment, and leaving only that very small and special selection which is likely to be practically useful.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 154-161</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Every individual is at once the beneficiary and the victim of the linguistic tradition into which he has been born—the beneficiary inasmuch as language gives access to the accumulated records of other people’s experience, the victim in so far as it confirms him in the belief that reduced awareness is the only awareness and as it bedevils his sense of reality, so that he is all too apt to take his concepts for data, his words for actual things.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 165-168</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Most people, most of the time, know only what comes through the reducing valve and is consecrated as genuinely real by the local language.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 170-171</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Visual impressions are greatly intensified and the eye recovers some of the perceptual innocence of childhood, when the sensum was not immediately and automatically subordinated to the concept.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 183-184</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;It was on Van Gogh, and the picture at which the book opened was “The Chair”—that astounding portrait of a Ding an Sich, which the mad painter saw, with a kind of adoring terror, and tried to render on his canvas. But it was a task to which the power even of genius proved wholly inadequate. The chair Van Gogh had seen was obviously the same in essence as the chair I had seen. But, though incomparably more real than the chairs of ordinary perception, the chair in his picture remained no more than an unusually expressive symbol of the fact.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 215-219</div></div><p>Giacometti went down this road as well.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Poring over Judith’s skirts, there in the World’s Biggest Drug Store, I knew that Botticelli—and not Botticelli alone, but many others too—had looked at draperies with the same transfigured and transfiguring eyes as had been mine that morning. They had seen the Istigkeit, the Allness and Infinity of folded cloth and had done their best to render it in paint or stone. Necessarily, of course, without success. For the glory and the wonder of pure existence belong to another order, beyond the power of even the highest art to express.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 270-274</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The untalented visionary may perceive an inner reality no less tremendous, beautiful and significant than the world beheld by Blake; but he lacks altogether the ability to express, in literary or plastic symbols, what he has seen.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 395-396</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;As recently as three hundred years ago an expression of thoroughgoing world denial and even world condemnation was both orthodox and comprehensible. “We should feel wonder at nothing at all in Nature except only the Incarnation of Christ.” In the seventeenth century, Lallemant’s phrase seemed to make sense. Today it has the ring of madness.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 406-408</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;For what seemed an immensely long time I gazed without knowing, even without wishing to know, what it was that confronted me. At any other time I would have seen a chair barred with alternate light and shade. Today the percept had swallowed up the concept. I was so completely absorbed in looking, so thunderstruck by what I actually saw, that I could not be aware of anything else. Garden furniture, laths, sunlight, shadow—these were no more than names and notions, mere verbalizations, for utilitarian or scientific purposes, after the event. The event was this succession of azure furnace doors separated by gulfs of unfathomable gentian. It was inexpressibly wonderful, wonderful to the point, almost, of being terrifying. And suddenly I had an inkling of what it must feel like to be mad. Schizophrenia has its heavens as well as its hells and purgatories.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 470-476</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The schizophrenic is a soul not merely unregenerate, but desperately sick into the bargain. His sickness consists in the inability to take refuge from inner and outer reality (as the sane person habitually does) in the homemade universe of common sense—the strictly human world of useful notions, shared symbols and socially acceptable conventions.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 498-500</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Here, in spite of the peculiar hideousness of the architecture, there were renewals of transcendental otherness, hints of the morning’s heaven. Brick chimneys and green composition roofs glowed in the sunshine, like fragments of the New Jerusalem. And all at once I saw what Guardi had seen and (with what incomparable skill) had so often rendered in his paintings—a stucco wall with a shadow slanting across it, blank but unforgettably beautiful, empty but charged with all the meaning and the mystery of existence. The revelation dawned and was gone again within a fraction of a second.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 547-551</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;That humanity at large will ever be able to dispense with Artificial Paradises seems very unlikely. Most men and women lead lives at the worst so painful, at the best so monotonous, poor and limited that the urge to escape, the longing to transcend themselves if only for a few moments, is and has always been one of the principal appetites of the soul.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 558-560</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;We can never dispense with language and the other symbol systems; for it is by means of them, and only by their means, that we have raised ourselves above the brutes, to the level of human beings. But we can easily become the victims as well as the beneficiaries of these systems. We must learn how to handle words effectively; but at the same time we must preserve and, if necessary, intensify our ability to look at the world directly and not through that half opaque medium of concepts, which distorts every given fact into the all too familiar likeness of some generic label or explanatory abstraction.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 670-675</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;About the physiological effects of mescalin we know a little. Probably (for we are not yet certain) it interferes with the enzyme system that regulates cerebral functioning. By doing so it lowers the efficiency of the brain as an instrument for focusing the mind on the problems of life on the surface of our planet. This lowering of what may be called the biological efficiency of the brain seems to permit the entry into consciousness of certain classes of mental events, which are normally excluded, because they possess no survival value.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 759-763</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;“I was sitting on the seashore, half listening to a friend arguing violently about something which merely bored me. Unconsciously to myself, I looked at a film of sand I had picked up on my hand, when I suddenly saw the exquisite beauty of every little grain of it; instead of being dull, I saw that each particle was made up on a perfect geometrical pattern, with sharp angles, from each of which a brilliant shaft of light was reflected, while each tiny crystal shone like a rainbow…. The rays crossed and recrossed, making exquisite patterns of such beauty that they left me breathless…. Then, suddenly, my consciousness was lighted up from within and I saw in a vivid way how the whole universe was made up of particles of material which, no matter how dull and lifeless they might seem, were nevertheless filled with this intense and vital beauty. For a second or two the whole world appeared as a blaze of glory. When it died down, it left me with something I have never forgotten and which constantly reminds me of the beauty locked up in every minute speck of material around us.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 828-836</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Thanks to glass, Paolo Uccello could design a circular jewel thirteen feet in diameter—his great window of the Resurrection, perhaps the most extraordinary single work of vision-inducing art ever produced.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 966-967</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Familiarity breeds indifference. We have seen too much pure, bright color at Woolworth’s to find it intrinsically transporting. And here we may note that, by its amazing capacity to give us too much of the best things, modern technology has tended to devaluate the traditional vision-inducing materials.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 1028-1030</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;With the development of chiaroscuro, in the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries, night came out of the background and installed itself within the picture, which became the scene of a kind of Manichean struggle between Light and Darkness. At the time they were painted these works must have possessed a real transporting power. To us, who have seen altogether too much of this kind of thing, most of them seem merely theatrical. But a few still retain their magic. There is Caravaggio’s “Entombment,” for example; there are a dozen magical paintings by Georges de Latour;* there are all those visionary Rembrandts where the lights have the intensity and significance of light at the mind’s antipodes, where the darks are full of rich potentialities waiting their turn to become actual, to make themselves glowingly present to our consciousness.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 1052-1058</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;There hangs in the Louvre a “Méditation du Philosophe,” whose symbolical subject matter is nothing more nor less than the human mind, with its teeming darknesses, its moments of intellectual and visionary illumination, its mysterious stairways winding downward and upward into the unknown. The meditating philosopher sits there in his island of inner illumination; and at the opposite end of the symbolic chamber, in another, rosier island, an old woman crouches before the hearth. The firelight touches and transfigures her face, and we see, concretely illustrated, the impossible paradox and supreme truth—that perception is (or at least can be, ought to be) the same as Revelation, that Reality shines out of every appearance, that the One is totally, infinitely present in all particulars.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 1061-1067</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Many schizophrenics have their times of heavenly happiness; but the fact that (unlike the mescalin taker) they do not know when, if ever, they will be permitted to return to the reassuring banality of everyday experience causes even heaven to seem appalling. But for those who, for whatever reason, are appalled, heaven turns into hell, bliss into horror, the Clear Light into the hateful glare of the land of lit-upness.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 1249-1252</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;For the living, the doors of heaven, hell and limbo are opened, not by “massy keys of metals twain,” but by the presence in the blood of one set of chemical compounds and the absence of another set. The shadow world inhabited by some schizophrenics and neurotics closely resembles the world of the dead, as described in some of the earlier religious traditions.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 1601-1603</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;[…] all is significant, but negatively significant, so that every event is utterly pointless, every object intensely unreal, every self-styled human being a clockwork dummy, grotesquely going through the motions of work and play, of loving, hating, thinking, of being eloquent, heroic, saintly, what you will—the robots are nothing if not versatile.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 1640-1642</div></div>      </div>
      </div>
        <div class="footer">
    <div class="footer-data"><div class="footer-links"><ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/contact.php" title="">Contact</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/support.php" title="">Support</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/privacy.php" title="">Privacy</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/rights.php" title="">Rights</a></li></ul></div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="copyright">Copyright (c) 1999-2026 earthli.com. All Rights Reserved.</div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="versions">Powered by <ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore/app_news.php">earthli News 3.7</a></li><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore" title="">earthli WebCore&trade; 3.7</a></li></ul></div></div>    </div>
      </div>
  </div>  </body>
</html>
]]>
  </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
      <title type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[The Road to Wigan Pier by George Orwell (1937) (read in 2017)]]>
  </title>
    <id>https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3407</id>
    <link href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3407"/>
    <updated>2017-07-26T17:23:55+02:00</updated>
    <author>
        <name type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[Marco von Ballmoos]]>
  </name>
      <uri>https://earthli.com/users/marco</uri>
    </author>
      <summary type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<blockquote class="quote abstract "><div>Disclaimer: these are notes I took while reading this book. They include citations I found interesting or enlightening or particularly well-written. In some cases, I&rsquo;ve pointed out which of these applies to which citation; in others, I have not. Any benefit you gain from reading these notes is... [<a class="complete-text-link" href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3407">More</a>]</div></blockquote>]]>
  </summary>
      <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<html lang="en">
  <head>
    <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/themes/ice.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/fonts/raleway.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/core/medium.css">
  </head>
  <body>
<div class="style-controls">  <div class="page">
    <div class="page-body">
<div class="info-box-top">
<p>
Published by <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_user.php?name=marco" title="Marco von Ballmoos" class="visible">marco</a> on <span class="date-time">26. Jul 2017 17:23:55 (GMT-5)</span>
</p>
</div>
      <div class="text-flow wide">
  <blockquote class="quote abstract "><div>Disclaimer: these are notes I took while reading this book. They include citations I found interesting or enlightening or particularly well-written. In some cases, I&rsquo;ve pointed out which of these applies to which citation; in others, I have not. Any benefit you gain from reading these notes is purely incidental to the purpose they serve of reminding me what I once read. Please see Wikipedia for a summary if I&rsquo;ve failed to provide one sufficient for your purposes. If my notes serve to trigger an interest in this book, then I&rsquo;m happy for you.</div></blockquote><p>This book is nearly divided into two parts.</p>
<p>The first details Orwell&rsquo;s travel to the northern part of England to live amongst miners in their communities. These are not nice communities. There is nothing green about them. They live cheek by jowl in atrocious sanitary conditions, surviving on scraps of food and barely making meager rents on their meager salaries. The work is nearly incomprehensibly back-breaking. Shifts are long. Life is without purpose other than to greet another day of misery.</p>
<p>Orwell swings in tone from somewhat judgmental (of the bad seeds) to exceedingly praising (of the stalwart workers). He compares moral/ethical life in the north favorably to what is to be found in the south, where the posh Englanders reside. Many of his observations of the working class as well as the intransigencies of capitalism are just as true today as they were then.</p>
<p>For example,</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;In a way it is even humiliating to watch coal-miners working. It raises in you a momentary doubt about your own status as an “intellectual” and a superior person generally. For it is brought home to you, at least while you are watching, that it is only because miners sweat their guts out that superior persons can remain superior.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;This business of petty inconvenience and indignity, of being kept waiting about, of having to do everything at other people’s convenience, is inherent in working-class life. A thousand influences constantly press a working man down into a passive rôle.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;It is only when you lodge in streets where nobody has a job, where getting a job seems about as probable as owning an aeroplane and much less probable than winning fifty pounds in the Football Pool, that you begin to grasp the changes that are being worked in our civilisation.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Life is still fairly normal, more normal than one really has the right to expect. Families are impoverished, but the family-system has not broken up. The people are in effect living a reduced version of their former lives. Instead of raging against their destiny they have made things tolerable by lowering their standards.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Twenty million people are underfed but literally everyone in England has access to a radio. What we have lost in food we have gained in electricity. Whole sections of the working class who have been plundered of all they really need are being compensated, in part, by cheap luxuries which mitigate the surface of life.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;And the peculiar evil is this, that the less money you have, the less inclined you feel to spend it on wholesome food. A millionaire may enjoy breakfasting off orange juice and Ryvita biscuits; an unemployed man doesn’t.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Every middle-class person has a dormant class-prejudice which needs only a small thing to arouse it; and if he is over forty he probably has a firm conviction that his own class has been sacrificed to the class below.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>Sound or feel familiar? These things seem to be constants in our society, by now. These are the hard nubs of capitalism that remain when surface affectation has worn away.</p>
<p>The second half of the book is a treatise on the state of Socialism in his day. He is very supportive of socialism but quite critical of its practitioners. He exhorts them to be more practical and to come up with realistic recruitment plans that don&rsquo;t involve insulting everyone who doesn&rsquo;t immediately agree with them. There is a lot of material here that is 100% applicable to leftist (and, perhaps still, especially socialist) movements today, in the first quarter of the 21st century, nearly 100 years after Orwell wrote his remarks. He offers some solid and practical advice:</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;To oppose Socialism now, when twenty million Englishmen are underfed and Fascism has conquered half Europe, is suicidal. It is like starting a civil war when the Goths are crossing the frontier.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;To recoil from Socialism because so many individual Socialists are inferior people is as absurd as refusing to travel by train because you dislike the ticket-collector’s face.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The Socialist movement has not time to be a league of dialectical materialists; it has got to be a league of the oppressed against the oppressors.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;But if you are constantly bullying me about my “bourgeois ideology,” if you give me to understand that in some subtle way I am an inferior person because I have never worked with my hands, you will only succeed in antagonising me. For you are telling me either that I am inherently useless or that I ought to alter myself in some way that is beyond my power.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;These are the sinking middle class, and most of them are clinging to their gentility under the impression that it keeps them afloat. It is not good policy to start by telling them to throw away the life-belt.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>A full listing of citations is below. The first half of the book may be more amenable to most, but both halves are well-worth reading. Highly recommended.</p>
<h2>Citations</h2><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;people will go on hypnotising themselves and others with a formula, even when that formula is patently outworn: so that it is still necessary, and will be necessary for a long time yet, to show that modern methods of production do work under Socialism and no longer work under capitalism.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 151-153</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;What is indeed essential, once that first appeal has been made to “liberty” and “justice,” is a careful and patient study of just how the thing works: of why capitalism inevitably means oppression and injustice and the horrible class society which Mr. Orwell so brilliantly depicts: of the means of transition to a Socialist society in which there will be neither oppressor nor oppressed.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 182-185</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;It struck me then that we are mistaken when we say that “It isn’t the same for them as it would be for us,” and that people bred in the slums can imagine nothing but the slums. For what I saw in her face was not the ignorant suffering of an animal. She knew well enough what was happening to her—understood as well as I did how dreadful a destiny it was to be kneeling there in the bitter cold, on the slimy stones of a slum backyard, poking a stick up a foul drain-pipe.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 361-364</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;them. In a crowded, dirty little country like ours one takes defilement almost for granted. Slag-heaps and chimneys seem a more normal, probable landscape than grass and trees, and even in the depths of the country when you drive your fork into the ground you half expect to lever up a broken bottle or a rusty can. But out here the snow was untrodden and lay so deep that only the tops of the stone boundary-walls were showing, winding over the hills like black paths.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 366-369</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;coal. In the metabolism of the Western world the coal-miner is second in importance only to the man who ploughs the soil. He is a sort of grimy caryatid upon whose shoulders nearly everything that is not grimy is supported.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 386-387</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;This is the coal face. Overhead is the smooth ceiling made by the rock from which the coal has been cut; underneath is the rock again, so that the gallery you are in is only as high as the ledge of coal itself, probably not much more than a yard. The first impression of all, overmastering everything else for a while, is the frightful, deafening din from the conveyor belt which carries the coal away. You cannot see very far, because the fog of coal dust throws back the beam of your lamp, but you can see on either side of you the line of half-naked kneeling men, one to every four or five yards, driving their shovels under the fallen coal and flinging it swiftly over their left shoulders. They are feeding it on to the conveyor belt, a moving rubber belt a couple of feet wide which runs a yard or two behind them.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 396-402</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;When I am digging trenches in my garden, if I shift two tons of earth during the afternoon, I feel that I have earned my tea. But earth is tractable stuff compared with coal, and I don’t have to work kneeling down, a thousand feet underground, in suffocating heat and swallowing coal dust with every breath I take; nor do I have to walk a mile bent double before I begin. The miner’s job would be as much beyond my power as it would be to perform on the flying trapeze or to win the Grand National.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 529-532</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;But on the whole we are not aware of it; we all know that we “must have coal,” but we seldom or never remember what coal-getting involves. Here am I, sitting writing in front of my comfortable coal fire. It is April but I still need a fire. Once a fortnight the coal cart drives up to the door and men in leather jerkins carry the coal indoors in stout sacks smelling of tar and shoot it clanking into the coal-hole under the stairs. It is only very rarely, when I make a definite mental effort, that I connect this coal with that far-off labour in the mines.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 543-546</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;It is not long since conditions in the mines were worse than they are now. There are still living a few very old women who in their youth have worked underground, with a harness round their waists and a chain that passed between their legs, crawling on all fours and dragging tubs of coal. They used to go on doing this even when they were pregnant. And even now, if coal could not be produced without pregnant women dragging it to and fro, I fancy we should let them do it rather than deprive ourselves of coal.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 550-553</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;It is not long since conditions in the mines were worse than they are now. There are still living a few very old women who in their youth have worked underground, with a harness round their waists and a chain that passed between their legs, crawling on all fours and dragging tubs of coal. They used to go on doing this even when they were pregnant. And even now, if coal could not be produced without pregnant women dragging it to and fro, I fancy we should let them do it rather than deprive ourselves of coal. But most of the time, of course, we should prefer to forget that they were doing it. It is so with all types of manual work; it keeps us alive, and we are oblivious of its existence.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 550-555</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;In a way it is even humiliating to watch coal-miners working. It raises in you a momentary doubt about your own status as an “intellectual” and a superior person generally. For it is brought home to you, at least while you are watching, that it is only because miners sweat their guts out that superior persons can remain superior.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 557-559</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;You and I and the editor of the Times Lit. Supp., and the Nancy poets and the Archbishop of Canterbury and Comrade X, author of Marxism for Infants—all of us really owe the comparative decency of our lives to poor drudges underground, blackened to the eyes, with their throats full of coal dust, driving their shovels forward with arms and belly muscles of steel.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 559-562</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Apparently the old superstition that it is bad luck to see a woman before going to work on the morning shift is not quite extinct.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 1</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Watching this man go to the colliery to draw his compensation, I was struck by the profound differences that are still made by status. Here was a man who had been half blinded in one of the most useful of all jobs and was drawing a pension to which he had a perfect right, if anybody has a right to anything. Yet he could not, so to speak, demand this pension—he could not, for instance, draw it when and how he wanted it. He had to go to the colliery once a week at a time named by the company, and when he got there he was kept waiting about for hours in the cold wind. For all I know he was also expected to touch his cap and show gratitude to whom-ever paid him; at any rate he had to waste an afternoon and spend sixpence in bus fares. It is very different for a member of the bourgeoisie,&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 5</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;This business of petty inconvenience and indignity, of being kept waiting about, of having to do everything at other people’s convenience, is inherent in working-class life. A thousand influences constantly press a working man down into a passive rôle.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 6</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;But mere notes like these are only valuable as reminders to myself. To me as I read them they bring back what I have seen, but they cannot in themselves give much idea of what conditions are like in those fearful northern slums. Words are such feeble things. What is the use of a brief phrase like “roof leaks” or “four beds for eight people”? It is the kind of thing your eye slides over, registering nothing. And yet what a wealth of misery it can cover I Take the question of overcrowding, for instance. Quite often you have eight or even ten people living in a three-roomed house. One of these rooms is a living-room, and as it probably measures about a dozen feet square and contains, besides the kitchen range and the sink, a table, some chairs and a dresser, there is no room in it for a bed. So there are eight or ten people sleeping in two small rooms, probably in at most four beds.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 10</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;One must remember that these people are not gypsies; they are decent English people who have all, except the children born there, had homes of their own in their day; besides, their caravans are greatly inferior to those of gypsies and they have not the great advantage of being on the move. No doubt there are still middle-class people who think that the Lower Orders don’t mind that kind of thing and who, if they happened to pass a caravan-colony in the train, would immediately assume that the people lived there from choice. I never argue nowadays with that kind of person. But it is worth noticing that the caravan-dwellers don’t even save money by living there, for they are paying about the same rents as they would for houses.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 14</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;But the northern working people do not take kindly to flats; even where flats exist they are contemptuously named “tenements.” Almost everyone will tell you that he “wants a house of his own,” and apparently a house in the middle of an unbroken block of houses a hundred yards long seems to them more “their own” than a flat situated in mid-air.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 17</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;It is a great achievement to get slum-dwellers into decent houses, but it is unfortunate that, owing to the peculiar temper of our time, it is also considered necessary to rob them of the last vestiges of their liberty. The people themselves feel this, and it is this feeling that they are rationalising when they complain that their new houses—so much better, as houses, than those they have come out of—are cold and uncomfortable and “unhomelike.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 19</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;But in addition there are great numbers of people who are in work but who, from a financial point of view, might equally well be unemployed, because they are not drawing anything that can be described as a living wage.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 21</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Still, an unemployed man who feels at home with books can at any rate occupy himself by reading. But what about the man who cannot read without discomfort? Take a miner, for instance, who has worked in the pit since childhood and has been trained to be a miner and nothing else. How the devil is he to fill up the empty days? It is absurd to say that he ought to be looking for work. There is no work to look for, and everybody knows it. You can’t go on looking for work every day for seven years.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 25</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;It is only when you lodge in streets where nobody has a job, where getting a job seems about as probable as owning an aeroplane and much less probable than winning fifty pounds in the Football Pool, that you begin to grasp the changes that are being worked in our civilisation.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 26</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;But at that time nobody cared to admit that unemployment was inevitable, because this meant admitting that it would probably continue. The middle classes were still talking about “lazy idle loafers on the dole” and saying that “these men could all find work if they wanted to,” and naturally these opinions percolated to the working class themselves. I remember the shock of astonishment it gave me, when I first mingled with tramps and beggars, to find that a fair proportion, perhaps a quarter, of these beings whom I had been taught to regard as cynical parasites, were decent young miners and cotton-workers gazing at their destiny with the same sort of dumb amazement as an animal in a trap. They simply could not understand what was happening to them. They had been brought up to work, and behold! it seemed as if they were never going to have the chance of working again.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 27</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Take, for instance, the fact that the working class think nothing of getting married on the dole. It annoys the old ladies in Brighton, but it is a proof of their essential good sense; they realise that losing your job does not mean that you cease to be a human being. So that in one way things in the distressed areas are not so bad as they might be. Life is still fairly normal, more normal than one really has the right to expect. Families are impoverished, but the family-system has not broken up. The people are in effect living a reduced version of their former lives. Instead of raging against their destiny they have made things tolerable by lowering their standards.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 28</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Twenty million people are underfed but literally everyone in England has access to a radio. What we have lost in food we have gained in electricity. Whole sections of the working class who have been plundered of all they really need are being compensated, in part, by cheap luxuries which mitigate the surface of life.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 29</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;They have neither turned revolutionary nor lost their self-respect; merely they have kept their tempers and settled down to make the best of things on a fish-and-chip standard. The alternative would be God knows what continued agonies of despair; or it might be attempted insurrections which, in a strongly governed country like England, could only lead to futile massacres and a régime of savage repression.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 29</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Therefore we are sometimes told that the whole thing is an astute manoeuvre by the governing class—a sort of “bread and circuses” business—to hold the unemployed down. What I have seen of our governing class does not convince me that they have that much intelligence. The thing has happened, but by an unconscious process—the quite natural interaction between the manufacturer’s need for a market and the need of half-starved people for cheap palliatives.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 29</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The basis of their diet, therefore, is white bread and margarine, corned beef, sugared tea and potatoes—an appalling diet. Would it not be better if they spent more money on wholesome things like oranges and wholemeal bread or if they even, like the writer of the letter to the New Statesman, saved on fuel and ate their carrots raw? Yes, it would, but the point is that no ordinary human being is ever going to do such a thing. The ordinary human being would sooner starve than live on brown bread and raw carrots.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 32</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;And the peculiar evil is this, that the less money you have, the less inclined you feel to spend it on wholesome food. A millionaire may enjoy breakfasting off orange juice and Ryvita biscuits; an unemployed man doesn’t.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 32</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;When you are unemployed, which is to say when you are underfed, harassed, bored and miserable, you don’t want to eat dull wholesome food. You want something a little bit “tasty.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 32</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;the modern industrial technique which provides you with cheap substitutes for everything. We may find in the long run that tinned food is a deadlier weapon than the machine gun.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 34</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;But the English palate, especially the working-class palate, now rejects good food almost automatically. The number of people who prefer tinned peas and tinned fish to real peas and real fish must be increasing every year, and plenty of people who could afford real milk in their tea would much sooner have tinned milk—even that dreadful tinned milk which is made of sugar and cornflour and has UNFIT FOR BABIES on the tin in huge letters. In some districts efforts are now being made to teach&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 34</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;He gave this as an instance of the mentality of the English governing class. First you condemn a family to live on thirty shillings a week, and then you have the damned impertinence to tell them how they are to spend their money.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 35</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;slag-heap is at best a hideous thing, because it is so planless and functionless. It is something just dumped on the earth, like the emptying of a giant’s dust-bin. On the outskirts of the mining towns there are frightful landscapes where your horizon is ringed completely round by jagged grey mountains, and underfoot is mud and ashes and overhead the steel cables where tubs of dirt travel slowly across miles of country. Often the slag-heaps are on fire, and at night you can see the red rivulets of fire winding this way and that, and also the slow-moving blue flames of sulphur, which always seem on the point of expiring and always spring out again. Even when a slag-heap sinks, as it does ultimately, only an evil brown grass grows on it, and it retains its hummocky surface.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 38</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;I remember a winter afternoon in the dreadful environs of Wigan. All round was the lunar landscape of slag-heaps, and to the north, through the passes, as it were, between the mountains of slag, you could see the factory chimneys sending out their plumes of smoke. The canal path was a mixture of cinders and frozen mud, criss-crossed by the imprints of innumerable clogs, and all round, as far as the slag-heaps in the distance, stretched the “flashes”—pools of stagnant water that has seeped into the hollows caused by the subsidence of ancient pits. It was horribly cold. The “flashes” were covered with ice the colour of raw umber, the bargemen were muffled to the eyes in sacks, the lock gates wore beards of ice. It seemed a world from which vegetation had been banished; nothing existed except smoke, shale, ice, mud, ashes and foul water. But even Wigan is beautiful compared with Sheffield.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 38</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;But the beauty or ugliness of industrialism hardly matters. Its real evil lies far deeper and is quite ineradicable. It is important to remember this, because there is always a temptation to think that industrialism is harmless so long as it is clean and orderly.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 40</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;If there are still such things as evening papers there will certainly be no racing news in them, for gambling will be meaningless in a world where there is no poverty and the horse will have vanished from the face of the earth.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 44</div></div><p>HAHAHA joke&rsquo;s on you, George Orwell! we avoided your future by not solving poverty. On purpose. So there.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The real bourgeoisie, those in the £2,000 a year class and over, have their money as a thick layer of padding between themselves and the class they plunder; in so far as they are aware of the Lower Orders at all they are aware of them as employees, servants and tradesmen.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 47</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;But it was not long before I was forbidden to play with the plumber’s children; they were “common” and I was told to keep away from them. This was snobbish, if you like, but it was also necessary, for middle-class people cannot afford to let their children grow up with vulgar accents. So, very early, the working class ceased to be a race of friendly and wonderful beings and became a race of enemies. We realised that they hated us, but we could never understand why, and naturally we set it down to pure, vicious malignity. To me in my early boyhood, to nearly all children of families like mine, “common” people seemed almost sub-human. They had coarse faces, hideous accents and gross manners, they hated everyone who was not like themselves, and if they got half a chance they would insult you in brutal ways. That was our view of them, and though it was false it was understandable.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 48</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Before the war their economic position was comparatively strong, for though there was no dole to fall back upon, there was not much unemployment, and the power of the boss class was not so obvious as it is now. A man did not see ruin staring him in the face every time he cheeked a “toff,” and naturally he did cheek a “toff” whenever it seemed safe to do&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 49</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;It is a pity that those who idealise the working class so often think it necessary to praise every working-class characteristic and therefore to pretend that dirtiness is somehow meritorious in itself.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 51</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;I have dwelt on these subjects because they are vitally important. To get rid of class-distinctions you have got to start by understanding how one class appears when seen through the eyes of another. It is useless to say that the middle classes are “snobbish” and leave it at that. You get no further if you do not realise that snobbishness is bound up with a species of idealism. It derives from the early training in which a middle-class child is taught almost simultaneously to wash his neck, to be ready to die for his country, and to despise the “lower classes.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 51</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Every middle-class person has a dormant class-prejudice which needs only a small thing to arouse it; and if he is over forty he probably has a firm conviction that his own class has been sacrificed to the class below.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 52</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Suggest to the average unthinking person of gentle birth who is struggling to keep up appearances on four or five hundred a year that he is a member of an exploiting parasite class, and he will think you are mad.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 52</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The notion that the working class have been absurdly pampered, hopelessly demoralised by doles, old age pensions, free education, etc., is still widely held; it has merely been a little shaken, perhaps, by the recent recognition that unemployment does exist.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 52</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The interest of passages like these (and they are scattered all through Saintsbury’s work) lies in their having been printed at all. Most people are a little shy of putting that kind of thing on paper. But what Saintsbury is saying here is what any little worm with a fairly safe five hundred a year thinks, and therefore in a way one must admire him for saying it.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 54</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;A middle-class person embraces Socialism and perhaps even joins the Communist Party. How much real difference does it make? Obviously, living within the framework of capitalist society, he has got to go on earning his living, and one cannot blame him if he clings to his bourgeois economic status. But is there any change in his tastes, his habits, his manners, his imaginative background—his “ideology,” in Communist jargon? Is there any change in him except that he now votes Labour, or, when possible. Communist at the elections? It is noticeable that he still habitually associates with his own class; he is vastly more at home with a member of his own class, who thinks him a dangerous Bolshie, than with a member of the working class who supposedly agrees with him; his tastes in food, wine, clothes, books, pictures, music, ballet, are still recognisably bourgeois tastes; most significant of all, he invariably marries into his own class.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 54</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;You forget your Latin and Greek within a few months of leaving school—I studied Greek for eight or ten years, and now, at thirty-three, I cannot even repeat the Greek alphabet—but your snobbishness, unless you persistently root it out like the bindweed it is, sticks by you till your grave.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 55</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Say what you will, our criminal law (far more humane, by the way, in India than in England) is a horrible thing. It needs very insensitive people to administer it. The wretched prisoners squatting in the reeking cages of the lock-ups, the grey cowed faces of the long-term convicts, the scarred buttocks of the men who had been flogged with bamboos, the women and children howling when their menfolk were led away under arrest—things like these are beyond bearing when you are in any way directly responsible for them.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 60</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;In the end I worked out an anarchistic theory that all government is evil, that the punishment always does more harm than the crime and that people can be trusted to behave decently if only you will let them alone. This of course was sentimental nonsense. I see now as I did not see then, that it is always necessary to protect peaceful people from violence. In any state of society where crime can be profitable you have got to have a harsh criminal law and administer it ruthlessly; the alternative is A1 Capone.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 60</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;It seemed to me then—it sometimes seems to me now, for that matter—that economic injustice will stop the moment we want it to stop, and no sooner, and if we genuinely want it to stop the method adopted hardly matters.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 61</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;For in the last resort, the only important question is, Do you want the British Empire to hold together or do you want it to disintegrate? And at the bottom of his heart no Englishman, least of all the kind of person who is witty about Anglo-Indian colonels, does want it to disintegrate. For, apart from any other consideration, the high standard of life we enjoy in England depends upon our keeping a tight hold on the Empire, particularly the tropical portions of it such as India and Africa. Under the capitalist system, in order that England may live in comparative comfort, a hundred million Indians must live on the verge of starvation—an evil state of affairs, but you acquiesce in it every time you step into a taxi or eat a plate of strawberries and cream. The alternative is to throw the Empire overboard and reduce England to a cold and unimportant little island where we should all have to work very hard and live mainly on herrings and potatoes. That is the very last thing that any left-winger wants. Yet the left-winger continues to feel that he has no moral responsibility for imperialism. He is perfectly ready to accept the products of Empire and to save his soul by sneering at the people who hold the Empire together.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 66</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;But the working-class intelligentsia is sharply divisible into two different types. There is the type who remains working-class—who goes on working as a mechanic or a dock-labourer or whatever it may be and does not bother to change his working-class accent and habits, but who “improves his mind” in his spare time and works for the I.L.P. or the Communist Party; and there is the type who does alter his way of life, at least externally, and who by means of State scholarships succeeds in climbing into the middle class. The first is one of the finest types of man we have. I can think of some I have met whom not even the most hidebound Tory could help liking and admiring.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 69</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;It hardly needs pointing out that at this moment we are in a very serious mess, so serious that even the dullest-witted people find it difficult to remain unaware of it. We are living in a world in which nobody is free, in which hardly anybody is secure, in which it is almost impossible to be honest and to remain alive. For enormous blocks of the working class the conditions of life are such as I have described in the opening chapters of this book, and there is no chance of those conditions showing any fundamental improvement.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 73</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Indeed, from one point of view, Socialism is such elementary common sense that I am sometimes amazed that it has not established itself already. The world is a raft sailing through space with, potentially, plenty of provisions for everybody; the idea that we must all co-operate and see to it that everyone does his fair share of the work and gets his fair share of the provisions, seems so blatantly obvious that one would say that no one could possibly fail to accept it unless he had some corrupt motive for clinging to the present system. Yet&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 73</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The whole thing amounts to a kind of malaise produced by dislike of individual Socialists, especially of the cocksure Marx-quoting type. Is it childish to be influenced by that kind of thing? Is it silly? Is it even contemptible? It is all that, but the point is that it happens, and therefore it is important to keep it in mind.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 81</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;You see here the defects of the method. Because he has detected the underlying economic cause of Fascism, he tacitly assumes that the spiritual side of it is of no importance. Fascism is written off as a manoeuvre of the “ruling class,” which at bottom it is. But this in itself would only explain why Fascism appeals to capitalists. What about the millions who are not capitalists, who in a material sense have nothing to gain from Fascism and are often aware of it, and who, nevertheless, are Fascists?&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 82</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;machine evolves by becoming more efficient, that is, more foolproof; hence the objective of mechanical progress is a foolproof world—which may or may not mean a world inhabited by fools.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 87</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;In tying yourself to the ideal of mechanical efficiency, you tie yourself to the ideal of softness. But softness is repulsive; and thus all progress is seen to be a frantic struggle towards an objective which you hope and pray will never be reached. Now and again, but not often, you meet somebody who grasps that what is usually called progress also entails what is usually called degeneracy, and who is nevertheless in favour of progress.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 87</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The labourer set free from digging may want to spend his leisure, or part of it, in playing the piano, while the professional pianist may be only too glad to get out and dig at the potato patch.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 88</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Mechanise the world as fully as it might be mechanised, and whichever way you turn there will be some machine cutting you off from the chance of working—that is, of living.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 88</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The sensitive person’s hostility to the machine is in one sense unrealistic, because of the obvious fact that the machine has come to stay. But as an attitude of mind there is a great deal to be said for it. The machine has got to be accepted, but it is probably better to accept it rather as one accepts a drug—that is, grudgingly and suspiciously. Like a drug, the machine is useful, dangerous and habit-forming. The oftener one surrenders to it the tighter its grip becomes.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 91</div></div><p>There&rsquo;s where you&rsquo;re wrong. They&rsquo;re not thinking at all. It&rsquo;s not background; it&rsquo;s replacement.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;There are now millions of people, and they are increasing every year, to whom the blaring of a radio is not only a more acceptable but a more normal background to their thoughts than the lowing of cattle or the song of birds.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 92</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Mechanisation leads to the decay of taste, the decay of taste leads to the demand for machine-made articles and hence to more mechanisation, and so a vicious circle is established.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 92</div></div><p>The same with information.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Give a Western man a job of work and he immediately begins devising a machine that would do it for him; give him a machine and he thinks of ways of improving it. I understand this tendency well enough, for in an ineffectual sort of way I have that type of mind myself. I have not either the patience or the mechanical skill to devise any machine that would work, but I am perpetually seeing, as it were, the ghosts of possible machines that might save me the trouble of using my brain or muscles.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 92</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The Socialists are right, therefore, when they claim that the rate of mechanical progress will be much more rapid once Socialism is established. Given a mechanical civilisation the process of invention and improvement will always continue, but the tendency of capitalism is to slow it down, because under capitalism any invention which does not promise fairly immediate profits is neglected; some, indeed, which threaten to reduce profits are suppressed almost as ruthlessly as the flexible glass mentioned by Petronius.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 93</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Verbally, no doubt, we would agree that machinery is made for man and not man for machinery; in practice any attempt to check the development of the machine appears to us as an attack on knowledge and therefore a kind of blasphemy.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 93</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;I am a degenerate modern semi-intellectual who would die if I did not get my early morning cup of tea and my New Statesman every Friday. Clearly I do not, in a sense, “want” to return to a simpler, harder, probably agricultural way of life. In the same sense I don’t “want” to cut down my drinking, to pay my debts, to take enough exercise, to be faithful to my wife, etc., etc. But in another and more permanent sense I do want these things, and perhaps in the same sense I want a civilisation in which “progress” is not definable as making the world safe for little fat men.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 95</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Meanwhile the thinking person, by intellect usually left-wing but by temperament often right-wing, hovers at the gate of the Socialist fold. He is no doubt aware that he ought to be a Socialist. But he observes first the dullness of individual Socialists, then the apparent flabbiness of Socialist ideals, and veers away.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 95</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Till quite recently it was natural to veer towards indifferentism. Ten years ago, even five years ago, the typical literary gent wrote books on baroque architecture and had a soul above politics. But that attitude is becoming difficult and even unfashionable. The times are growing harsher, the issues are clearer, the belief that nothing will ever change (i.e. that your dividends will always be safe) is less prevalent. The fence on which the literary gent sits, once as comfortable as the plush cushion of a cathedral stall, is now pinching his bottom intolerably; more and more he shows a disposition to drop off on one side or the other.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 95</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;I believe that when the pinch comes there is a terrible danger that the main movement of the intelligentsia will be towards Fascism.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 95</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;That will also be the moment when every person with any brains or any decency will know in his bones that he ought to be on the Socialist side. But he will not necessarily come there of his own accord; there are too many ancient prejudices standing in the way. He will have to be persuaded, and by methods that imply an understanding of his viewpoint. Socialists cannot afford to waste any more time in preaching to the converted.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 95</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;In order to combat Fascism it is necessary to understand it, which involves admitting that it contains some good as well as much evil. In practice, of course, it is merely an infamous tyranny, and its methods of attaining and holding power are such that even its most ardent apologists prefer to talk about something else. But the underlying feeling of Fascism, the feeling that first draws people into the Fascist camp, may be less contemptible. It is not always, as the Saturday Review would lead one to suppose, a squealing terror of the Bolshevik bogey-man. Everyone who has given the movement so much as a glance knows that the rank-and-file Fascist is often quite a well-meaning person—quite genuinely anxious, for instance, to better the lot of the unemployed. But more important than this is the fact that Fascism draws its strength from the good as well as the bad varieties of conservatism.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 96</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;[…] more to the fact that Socialists have, so to speak, presented their case wrong side foremost. They have never made it sufficiently clear that the essential aims of Socialism are justice and liberty. With their eyes glued to economic facts, they have proceeded on the assumption that man has no soul, and explicitly or implicitly they have set up the goal of a materialistic Utopia. As a result Fascism has been able to play upon every instinct that revolts against hedonism and a cheap conception of “progress.” It has been able to pose as the upholder of the European tradition, and to appeal to Christian belief, to patriotism and to the military virtues. It is far worse than useless to write Fascism off as “mass sadism,” or some easy phrase of that kind. If you pretend that it is merely an aberration which will presently pass off of its own accord, you are dreaming a dream from which you will awake when somebody coshes you with a rubber truncheon.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 97</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;It is usual to speak of the Fascist objective as the “beehive state,” which does a grave injustice to bees. A world of rabbits ruled by stoats would be nearer the mark.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 98</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The distaste for “progress” and machine-civilisation which is so common among sensitive people is only defensible as an attitude of mind. It is not valid as a reason for rejecting Socialism, because it presupposes an alternative which does not exist. When you say, “I object to mechanisation and standardisation—therefore I object to Socialism,” you are saying in effect, “I am free to do without the machine if I choose,” which is nonsense. We are all dependent upon the machine, and if the machines stopped working most of us would die. You may hate the machine-civilisation, probably you are right to hate it, but for the present there can be no question of accepting or rejecting it. The machine-civilisation is here, and it can only be criticised from the inside, because all of us are inside&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 99</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;To oppose Socialism now, when twenty million Englishmen are underfed and Fascism has conquered half Europe, is suicidal. It is like starting a civil war when the Goths are crossing the frontier.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 100</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;To recoil from Socialism because so many individual Socialists are inferior people is as absurd as refusing to travel by train because you dislike the ticket-collector’s face.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 100</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The Socialist movement has not time to be a league of dialectical materialists; it has got to be a league of the oppressed against the oppressors.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 101</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;You have got to attract the man who means business, and you have got to drive away the mealy-mouthed Liberal who wants foreign Fascism destroyed in order that he may go on drawing his dividends peacefully—the type of humbug who passes resolutions “against Fascism and Communism,” i.e. against rats and rat-&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 101</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;It is fatal to let the ordinary enquirer get away with the idea that being a Socialist means wearing sandals and burbling about dialectical materialism. You have got to make it clear that there is room in the Socialist movement for human beings, or the game is up.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 102</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;And what about that far larger class, running into millions this time—the office-workers and black-coated employees of all kinds—whose traditions are less definitely middle class but who would certainly not thank you if you called them proletarians? All of these people have the same interests and the same enemies as the working class. All are being robbed and bullied by the same system. Yet how many of them realise it? When the pinch came nearly all of them would side with their oppressors and against those who ought to be their allies. It is quite easy to imagine a middle class crushed down to the worst depths of poverty and still remaining bitterly anti-working class in sentiment; this being, of course, a ready-made Fascist Party.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 103</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Once again it is a question of sticking to essentials; and the essential point here is that all people with small, insecure incomes are in the same boat and ought to be fighting on the same side. Probably we could do with a little less talk about “capitalist” and “proletarian” and a little more about the robbers and the robbed. But at any rate we must drop that misleading habit of pretending that the only proletarians are manual labourers.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 104</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The people who have got to act together are all those who cringe to the boss and all those who shudder when they think of the rent. This means that the small-holder has got to ally himself with the factory-hand, the typist with the coal-miner, the schoolmaster with the garage mechanic. There is some hope of getting them to do so if they can be made to understand where their interest lies. But this will not happen if their social prejudices, which in some of them are at least as strong as any economic consideration, are needlessly irritated.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 105</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Once again, here am I, with my middle-class origins and my income of about three pounds a week from all sources. For what I am worth it would be better to get me in on the Socialist side than to turn me into a Fascist. But if you are constantly bullying me about my “bourgeois ideology,” if you give me to understand that in some subtle way I am an inferior person because I have never worked with my hands, you will only succeed in antagonising me. For you are telling me either that I am inherently useless or that I ought to alter myself in some way that is beyond my power.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 105</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;These are the sinking middle class, and most of them are clinging to their gentility under the impression that it keeps them afloat. It is not good policy to start by telling them to throw away the life-belt.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 106</div></div>      </div>
      </div>
        <div class="footer">
    <div class="footer-data"><div class="footer-links"><ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/contact.php" title="">Contact</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/support.php" title="">Support</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/privacy.php" title="">Privacy</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/rights.php" title="">Rights</a></li></ul></div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="copyright">Copyright (c) 1999-2026 earthli.com. All Rights Reserved.</div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="versions">Powered by <ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore/app_news.php">earthli News 3.7</a></li><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore" title="">earthli WebCore&trade; 3.7</a></li></ul></div></div>    </div>
      </div>
  </div>  </body>
</html>
]]>
  </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
      <title type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[The New Jim Crow by Michelle Alexander (2012) (read in 2017)]]>
  </title>
    <id>https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3429</id>
    <link href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3429"/>
    <updated>2017-07-25T22:57:28+02:00</updated>
    <author>
        <name type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[Marco von Ballmoos]]>
  </name>
      <uri>https://earthli.com/users/marco</uri>
    </author>
      <summary type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<blockquote class="quote abstract "><div>Disclaimer: these are notes I took while reading this book. They include citations I found interesting or enlightening or particularly well-written. In some cases, I&rsquo;ve pointed out which of these applies to which citation; in others, I have not. Any benefit you gain from reading these notes is... [<a class="complete-text-link" href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3429">More</a>]</div></blockquote>]]>
  </summary>
      <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<html lang="en">
  <head>
    <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/themes/ice.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/fonts/raleway.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/core/medium.css">
  </head>
  <body>
<div class="style-controls">  <div class="page">
    <div class="page-body">
<div class="info-box-top">
<p>
Published by <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_user.php?name=marco" title="Marco von Ballmoos" class="visible">marco</a> on <span class="date-time">25. Jul 2017 22:57:28 (GMT-5)</span>
</p>
</div>
      <div class="text-flow wide">
  <blockquote class="quote abstract "><div>Disclaimer: these are notes I took while reading this book. They include citations I found interesting or enlightening or particularly well-written. In some cases, I&rsquo;ve pointed out which of these applies to which citation; in others, I have not. Any benefit you gain from reading these notes is purely incidental to the purpose they serve of reminding me what I once read. Please see Wikipedia for a summary if I&rsquo;ve failed to provide one sufficient for your purposes. If my notes serve to trigger an interest in this book, then I&rsquo;m happy for you.</div></blockquote><p>This is an impeccably researched, devastatingly factual, relentlessly focused and canonical volume on ongoing institutional racism against blacks in the United States. The argument is that the power over blacks that whites had through slavery was not eradicated with the end of slavery, but rather made to go (very temporarily) underground only to reappear as Jim Crow laws—laws that subjugated blacks just as effectively as slavery without the stigma of human chattel.</p>
<p>She continues the argument that the 20th-century (and now, 21st-century) United States prison system almost totally subverts civil-rights achievements by continuing the subjugation of blacks, sending them once again to a second-class society in America, just as effectively as slavery and the Jim Crow laws did.</p>
<p>The U.S. slavery laws designated black people as property. This kept them in an official lower caste. Once owning people was no longer socially acceptable, the caste system was continued by denying all sorts of rights with poll tests and other extremely precisely defined qualification systems, collectively known as Jim Crow laws. Once the Jim Crow laws were deemed illegal—and, more importantly, no longer socially acceptable—the elites pivoted once again and came up with a new way of relegating blacks to a second-class caste: criminalization.</p>
<p>Fueled by a tremendous propaganda effort—as well as very willing participants—one law after another was created, targeting blacks specifically in order to mark them as voluntary criminals and therefore unworthy of participation in mainstream society. The U.S. Drug War was instrumental in this mission. The many ways in which the criminalization of blacks was achieved are breathtakingly insidious and devious. The most devious part is that the latest incarnation disarmed the civil-rights movement&rsquo;s best weapon: the morally offensive racial bias of Jim Crow laws tended to pull people together to support their discriminated brethren. By swapping race for criminality, they drive a wedge between potential non-criminal supporters and those who have supposedly chosen a life of crime.</p>
<p>Alexander presents her thesis relentlessly, heaping an irrefutable amount of information on the reader until the propaganda wall of all but the most hardened racists must be broken down. That might be giving people too much credit, though.</p>
<h2>Citations</h2><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;In Washington, D.C., our nation’s capitol, it is estimated that three out of four young black men (and nearly all those in the poorest neighborhoods) can expect to serve time in prison. Similar rates of incarceration can be found in black communities across America.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 6</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;In some states, black men have been admitted to prison on drug charges at rates twenty to fifty times greater than those of white men.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 7</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The only country in the world that even comes close to the American rate of incarceration is Russia, and no other country in the world incarcerates such an astonishing percentage of its racial or ethnic minorities.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 8</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;These days, activists who advocate “a world without prisons” are often dismissed as quacks, but only a few decades ago, the notion that our society would be much better off without prisons—and that the end of prisons was more or less inevitable—not only dominated mainstream academic discourse in the field of criminology but also inspired a national campaign by reformers demanding a moratorium on prison construction.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 8</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;One in three young African American men will serve time in prison if current trends continue, and in some cities more than half of all young adult black men are currently under correctional control—in prison or jail, on probation or parole.20 Yet mass incarceration tends to be categorized as a criminal justice issue as opposed to a racial justice or civil rights issue (or crisis).&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 9</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The popular narrative that emphasizes the death of slavery and Jim Crow and celebrates the nation’s “triumph over race” with the election of Barack Obama, is dangerously misguided. The colorblind public consensus that prevails in America today—i.e., the widespread belief that race no longer matters—has blinded us to the realities of race in our society and facilitated the emergence of a new caste system.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 11</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Few legal rules meaningfully constrain the police in the drug war, and enormous financial incentives have been granted to law enforcement to engage in mass drug arrests through military-style tactics. Once swept into the system, one’s chances of ever being truly free are slim, often to the vanishing point.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 16</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The demand for land was met by invading and conquering larger and larger swaths of territory. American Indians became a growing impediment to white European “progress,” and during this period, the images of American Indians promoted in books, newspapers, and magazines became increasingly negative.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 23</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;In an effort to protect their superior status and economic position, the planters shifted their strategy for maintaining dominance. They abandoned their heavy reliance on indentured servants in favor of the importation of more black slaves. Instead of importing English-speaking slaves from the West Indies, who were more likely to be familiar with European language and culture, many more slaves were shipped directly from Africa. These slaves would be far easier to control and far less likely to form alliances with poor whites.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 24</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The notion of white supremacy rationalized the enslavement of Africans, even as whites endeavored to form a new nation based on the ideals of equality, liberty, and justice for all. Before democracy, chattel slavery in America was born. It may be impossible to overstate the significance of race in defining the basic structure of American society. The structure and content of the original Constitution was based largely on the effort to preserve a racial caste system—slavery—while at the same time affording political and economic rights to whites, especially propertied whites.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 25</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Nine Southern states adopted vagrancy laws—which essentially made it a criminal offense not to work and were applied selectively to blacks—and eight of those states enacted convict laws allowing for the hiring-out of county prisoners to plantation owners and private companies. Prisoners were forced to work for little or no pay.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 28</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Once again, vagrancy laws and other laws defining activities such as “mischief” and “insulting gestures” as crimes were enforced vigorously against blacks. The aggressive enforcement of these criminal offenses opened up an enormous market for convict leasing, in which prisoners were contracted out as laborers to the highest private bidder.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 31</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;As described by sociologist Katherine Beckett, “The (alleged) misbehaviors of the poor were transformed from adaptations to poverty that had the unfortunate effect of reproducing it into character failings that accounted for poverty in the first place.”56 The “social pathologies” of the poor, particularly street crime, illegal drug use, and delinquency, were redefined by conservatives as having their cause in overly generous relief arrangements. Black “welfare cheats” and their dangerous offspring emerged, for the first time, in the political discourse and media imagery.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 45</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;By 1968, 81 percent of those responding to the Gallup Poll agreed with the statement that “law and order has broken down in this country,” and the majority blamed &lsquo;Negroes who start riots&rsquo; and &lsquo;Communists.&rsquo;&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 46</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;One study indicates that as late as 1970, more than 70 percent of all blacks working in metropolitan areas held blue-collar jobs.78 Yet by 1987, when the drug war hit high gear, the industrial employment of black men had plummeted to 28 percent.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 50</div></div><p>Can those numbers even be properly compared?</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The articles typically featured black “crack whores,” “crack babies,” and “gangbangers,” reinforcing already prevalent racial stereotypes of black women as irresponsible, selfish “welfare queens,” and black men as “predators”—part of an inferior and criminal subculture.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 52</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The bonanza continued into 1989, as the media continued to disseminate claims that crack was an “epidemic,” a “plague,” “instantly addictive,” and extraordinarily dangerous—claims that have now been proven false or highly misleading.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 52</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;One senator insisted that crack had become a scapegoat distracting the public’s attention from the true causes of our social ills, arguing: “If we blame crime on crack, our politicians are off the hook. Forgotten are the failed schools, the malign welfare programs, the desolate neighborhoods, the wasted years. Only crack is to blame. <strong>One is tempted to think that if crack did not exist, someone somewhere would have received a Federal grant to develop it.”</strong> (Emphasis added.)&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 53</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Shortly thereafter, a New York Times/CBS News Poll reported that 64 percent of those polled—the highest percentage ever recorded—now thought that drugs were the most significant problem in the United States.94 This surge of public concern did not correspond to a dramatic shift in illegal drug activity, but instead was the product of a carefully orchestrated political campaign. <strong>The level of public concern about crime and drugs was only weakly correlated with actual crime rates, but highly correlated with political initiatives, campaigns, and partisan appeals.</strong> (Emphasis added.)&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 55</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;During Clinton’s tenure, Washington slashed funding for public housing by $17 billion (a reduction of 61 percent) and boosted corrections by $19 billion (an increase of 171 percent), <strong>“effectively making the construction of prisons the nation’s main housing program for the urban poor.”</strong> (Emphasis added.)&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 57</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;More than 2 million people found themselves behind bars at the turn of the twenty-first century, and millions more were relegated to the margins of mainstream society, banished to a political and social space not unlike Jim Crow, where discrimination in employment, housing, and access to education was perfectly legal, and where they could be denied the right to vote. The system functioned relatively automatically, and the prevailing system of racial meanings, identities, and ideologies already seemed natural. Ninety percent of those admitted to prison for drug offenses in many states were black or Latino, yet the mass incarceration of communities of color was explained in race-neutral terms, an adaptation to the needs and demands of the current political climate. The New Jim Crow was born.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 58</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Full-blown trials of guilt or innocence rarely occur; many people never even meet with an attorney; witnesses are routinely paid and coerced by the government; police regularly stop and search people for no reason whatsoever; penalties for many crimes are so severe that innocent people plead guilty, accepting plea bargains to avoid harsh mandatory sentences; and children, even as young as fourteen, are sent to adult prisons.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 59</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;[…] state and local law enforcement agencies were granted the authority to keep, for their own use, the vast majority of cash and assets they seize when waging the drug war. <strong>This dramatic change in policy gave state and local police an enormous stake in the War on Drugs—not in its success, but in its perpetual existence.</strong> (Emphasis added.)&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 78</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;When a drug dealer is sent to jail, there are many others ready and willing to take his place, but seizing the means of production, some legislators reasoned, may shut down the trafficking business for good. Over the years, the list of properties subject to forfeiture expanded greatly, and the required connection to illegal drug activity became increasingly remote, leading to many instances of abuse. But it was not until 1984, when Congress amended the federal law to allow federal law enforcement agencies to retain and use any and all proceeds from asset forfeitures, and to allow state and local police agencies to retain up to 80 percent of the assets’ value, that a true revolution occurred.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 78</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Quite predictably, the enormous economic rewards created by both the drug-war forfeiture and Byrne-grant laws has created an environment in which a very fine line exists between the lawful and the unlawful taking of other people’s money and property—a line so thin that some officers disregard the formalities of search warrants, probable cause, and reasonable suspicion altogether.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 80</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;In Virginia, for example, fees paid to court-appointed attorneys for representing someone charged with a felony that carries a sentence of less than twenty years are capped at $428. And in Wisconsin, more than 11,000 poor people go to court without representation every year because anyone who earns more than $3,000 per year is considered able to afford a lawyer.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 85</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;“All too often, defendants plead guilty, even if they are innocent, without really understanding their legal rights or what is occurring. Sometimes the proceedings reflect little or no recognition that the accused is mentally ill or does not adequately understand English. The fundamental right to a lawyer that Americans assume applies to everyone accused of criminal conduct effectively does not exist in practice for countless people across the United States.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 85</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;For those released on probation or parole, the risks are especially high. They are subject to regular surveillance and monitoring by the police and may be stopped and searched (with or without their consent) for any reason or no reason at all. As a result, they are far more likely to be arrested (again) than those whose behavior is not subject to constant scrutiny by law enforcement.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 94</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;In this system of control, failing to cope well with one’s exile status is treated like a crime. If you fail, after being released from prison with a criminal record—your personal badge of inferiority—to remain drug free, or if you fail to get a job against all the odds, or if you get depressed and miss an appointment with your parole officer (or if you cannot afford the bus fare to take you there), you can be sent right back to prison—where society apparently thinks millions of Americans belong.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 95</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Human Rights Watch reported in 2000 that, in seven states, African Americans constitute 80 to 90 percent of all drug offenders sent to prison. In at least fifteen states, blacks are admitted to prison on drug charges at a rate from twenty to fifty-seven times greater than that of white men. In fact, nationwide, the rate of incarceration for African American drug offenders dwarfs the rate of whites.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 98</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;When the War on Drugs gained full steam in the mid-1980s, prison admissions for African Americans skyrocketed, nearly quadrupling in three years, and then increasing steadily until it reached in 2000 a level more than twenty-six times the level in 1983.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 98</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Any notion that drug use among blacks is more severe or dangerous is belied by the data; white youth have about three times the number of drug-related emergency room visits as their African American counterparts.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 99</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The racial bias inherent in the drug war is a major reason that 1 in every 14 black men was behind bars in 2006, compared with 1 in 106 white men.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 100</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The problem with this abbreviated analysis is that violent crime is not responsible for mass incarceration. As numerous researchers have shown, violent crime rates have fluctuated over the years and bear little relationship to incarceration rates—which have soared during the past three decades regardless of whether violent crime was going up or down.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 101</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;What is painfully obvious when one steps back from individual cases and specific policies is that <strong>the system of mass incarceration operates with stunning efficiency to sweep people of color off the streets, lock them in cages, and then release them into an inferior second-class status.</strong> Nowhere is this more true than in the War on Drugs. (Emphasis added.)&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 103</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;These findings are consistent with numerous other studies, including a study of network television news from 1990 and 1991, which found that a predictable “us against them” frame was used in the news stories, with “us” being white, suburban America, and “them” being black Americans and a few corrupted whites.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 105</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Viewed as a whole, the relevant research by cognitive and social psychologists to date suggests that racial bias in the drug war was inevitable, once a public consensus was constructed by political and media elites that drug crime is black and brown.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 107</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;According to the Court, whether or not police discriminate on the basis of race when making traffic stops is irrelevant to a consideration of whether their conduct is “reasonable” under the Fourth Amendment.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 109</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The real issue at hand was whether—and to what extent—the Supreme Court would tolerate racial bias in the criminal justice system as a whole. The Court’s answer was that racial bias would be tolerated—virtually to any degree—so long as no one admitted it.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 109</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The very evidence that the Court demanded in McCleskey—evidence of deliberate bias in his individual case—would almost always be unavailable and/or inadmissible due to procedural rules that shield jurors and prosecutors from scrutiny. This dilemma was of little concern to the Court. It closed the courthouse doors to claims of racial bias in sentencing. There is good reason to believe that, despite appearances, the McCleskey decision was not really about the death penalty at all; rather, <strong>the Court’s opinion was driven by a desire to immunize the entire criminal justice system from claims of racial bias.</strong> (Emphasis added.)&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 111</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;“The presumption of innocence is now a legal myth,” he declared. “The 100-to-1 ratio, coupled with mandatory minimum sentencing provided by federal statute, has created a situation that reeks with inhumanity and injustice. . . . If young white males were being incarcerated at the same rate as young black males, the statute would have been amended long ago.” Judge Cahill sentenced Clary as if the drug he had carried home had been powder cocaine. The sentence imposed was four years in prison. Clary served his term and was released.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 113</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The Georgia Supreme Court ruled, by a 4–3 vote, that the stark racial disparity presented a threshold case of discrimination and required the prosecutors to offer a race-neutral explanation for the results. Rather than offer a justification, however, the Georgia attorney general filed a petition for rehearing signed by every one of the state’s forty-six district attorneys, all of whom were white. <strong>The petition argued that the Court’s decision was a dire mistake; if the decision were allowed to stand and prosecutors were compelled to explain gross racial disparities such as the ones at issue, it would be a “substantial step toward invalidating” the death penalty and would “paralyze the criminal justice system”—apparently because severe and inexplicable racial disparities pervaded the system as a whole.</strong> (Emphasis added.)&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 114</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Most prosecutors’ offices lack any manual or guidebook advising prosecutors how to make discretionary decisions. Even the American Bar Association’s standards of practice for prosecutors are purely aspirational; no prosecutor is required to follow the standards or even consider them.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 115</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;With no trace of irony, the Court demanded that Armstrong produce in advance the very thing he sought in discovery: information regarding white defendants who should have been charged in federal court. That information, of course, was in the prosecution’s possession and control, which is why Armstrong filed a discovery motion in the first place.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 117</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;A report in 2000 observed that among youth who have never been sent to a juvenile prison before, African Americans were more than six times as likely as whites to be sentenced to prison for identical crimes.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 118</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Achieving an all-white jury, or nearly all-white jury, is easy in most jurisdictions, because relatively few racial minorities are included in the jury pool. Potential jurors are typically called for service based on the list of registered voters or Department of Motor Vehicle lists—sources that contain disproportionately fewer people of color, because people of color are significantly less likely to own cars or register to vote. Making matters worse, thirty-one states and the federal government subscribe to the practice of lifetime felon exclusion from juries. As a result, about 30 percent of black men are automatically banned from jury service for life. Accordingly, no more than a handful of strikes are necessary in many cases to eliminate all or nearly all black jurors.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 121</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;As noted earlier, at least 10 percent of Americans violate drug laws every year, and people of all races engage in illegal drug activity at similar rates. With such an extraordinarily large population of offenders to choose from, decisions must be made regarding who should be targeted and where the drug war should be waged. From the outset, the drug war could have been waged primarily in overwhelmingly white suburbs or on college campuses. SWAT teams could have rappelled from helicopters in gated suburban communities and raided the homes of high school lacrosse players known for hosting coke and ecstasy parties after their games. The police could have seized televisions, furniture, and cash from fraternity houses based on an anonymous tip that a few joints or a stash of cocaine could be found hidden in someone’s dresser drawer.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 123</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Instead, when police go looking for drugs, they look in the ’hood. <strong>Tactics that would be political suicide in an upscale white suburb are not even newsworthy in poor black and brown communities.</strong> So long as mass drug arrests are concentrated in impoverished urban areas, police chiefs have little reason to fear a political backlash, no matter how aggressive and warlike the efforts may be. (Emphasis added.)&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 124</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The hypersegregation of the black poor in ghetto communities has made the roundup easy. Confined to ghetto areas and lacking political power, the black poor are convenient targets. Douglas Massey and Nancy Denton’s book, American Apartheid, documents how racially segregated ghettos were deliberately created by federal policy, not impersonal market forces or private housing choices. The enduring racial isolation of the ghetto poor has made them uniquely vulnerable in the War on Drugs.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 124</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The facts were as follows: Seattle residents were far more likely to report suspected narcotics activities in residences—not outdoors—but police devoted their resources to open-air drug markets and to the one precinct that was least likely to be identified as the site of suspected drug activity in citizen complaints. In fact, although hundreds of outdoor drug transactions were recorded in predominantly white areas of Seattle, police concentrated their drug enforcement efforts in one downtown drug market where the frequency of drug transactions was much lower. In racially mixed open-air drug markets, black dealers were far more likely to be arrested than whites, even though white dealers were present and visible.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 127</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The Seattle Police Department’s] focus on black and Latino individuals and on the drug most strongly associated with ‘blackness’ suggest that law enforcement policies and practices are predicated on the assumption that the drug problem is, in fact, a black and Latino one, and that crack, the drug most strongly associated with urban blacks, is ‘the worst.’” This racialized cultural script about who and what constitutes the drug problem renders illegal drug activity by whites invisible. <strong>“White people,” the study’s authors observed, “are simply not perceived as drug offenders by Seattle police officers.”</strong> (Emphasis added.)&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 127</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;A black kid arrested twice for possession of marijuana may be no more of a repeat offender than a white frat boy who regularly smokes pot in his dorm room. But because of his race and his confinement to a racially segregated ghetto, the black kid has a criminal record, while the white frat boy, because of his race and relative privilege, does not. <strong>Thus, when prosecutors throw the book at black repeat offenders or when police stalk ex-offenders and subject them to regular frisks and searches on the grounds that it makes sense to “watch criminals closely,” they are often exacerbating racial disparities created by the discretionary decision to wage the War on Drugs almost exclusively in poor communities of color.</strong> (Emphasis added.)&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 132</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;What most surprised many analysts was that, in both studies, whites were actually more likely than people of color to be carrying illegal drugs or contraband in their vehicles. In fact, in New Jersey, whites were almost twice as likely to be found with illegal drugs or contraband as African Americans, and five times as likely to be found with contraband as Latinos. Although whites were more likely to be guilty of carrying drugs, they were far less likely to be viewed as suspicious, resulting in relatively few stops, searches, and arrests of whites.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 133</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Although the NYPD frequently attempts to justify stop-and-frisk operations in poor communities of color on the grounds that such tactics are necessary to get guns off the streets, less than 1 percent of stops (0.15 percent) resulted in guns being found, and guns and other contraband were seized less often in stops of African Americans and Latinos than of whites.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 136</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The NYPD made 50,300 marijuana arrests in 2010 alone, mostly of young men of color. As one report noted, these marijuana arrests offer “training opportunities” for rookie police who can practice on ghetto kids while earning overtime.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 136</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;These arrests serve another purpose as well: they “are the most effective way for the NYPD to collect fingerprints, photographs and other information on young people not yet entered into the criminal databases.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 136</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;A simple arrest for marijuana possession can show up on criminal databases as “a drug arrest” without specifying the substance or the charge, and without clarifying even whether the person was convicted. These databases are then used by police and prosecutors, as well as by employers and housing officials—an electronic record that will haunt many for life.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 136</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Hundreds of years ago, our nation put those considered less than human in shackles; less than one hundred years ago, we relegated them to the other side of town; today we put them in cages. Once released, they find that a heavy and cruel hand has been laid upon them.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 141</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;When a defendant pleads guilty to a minor drug offense, nobody will likely tell him that he may be permanently forfeiting his right to vote as well as his right to serve on a jury—two of the most fundamental rights in any modern democracy.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 142</div></div><p>Most democracies do not have jury systems.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;As Jeremy Travis has observed, “In this brave new world, punishment for the original offense is no longer enough; one’s debt to society is never paid.” Other commentators liken the prison label to “the mark of Cain” and characterize the perpetual nature of the sanction as “internal exile.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 142</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Myriad laws, rules, and regulations operate to discriminate against ex-offenders and effectively prevent their reintegration into the mainstream society and economy. These restrictions amount to a form of “civic death” and send the unequivocal message that “they” are no longer part of “us.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 142</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;[The] offender may be sentenced to a term of probation, community service, and court costs. Unbeknownst to this offender, and perhaps any other actor in the sentencing process, as a result of his conviction he may be ineligible for many federally-funded health and welfare benefits, food stamps, public housing, and federal educational assistance. His driver’s license may be automatically suspended, and he may no longer qualify for certain employment and professional licenses. If he is convicted of another crime he may be subject to imprisonment as a repeat offender. He will not be permitted to enlist in the military, or possess a firearm, or obtain a federal security clearance. If a citizen, he may lose the right to vote; if not, he becomes immediately deportable.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 143</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Despite the brutal, debilitating impact of these “collateral consequences” on ex-offenders’ lives, courts have generally declined to find that such sanctions are actually “punishment” for constitutional purposes. As a result, judges are not required to inform criminal defendants of some of the most important rights they are forfeiting when they plead guilty to a felony.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 143</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Prisoners returning “home” are typically the poorest of the poor, lacking the ability to pay for private housing and routinely denied public housing assistance—the type of assistance which could provide some much-needed stability in their lives. For them, “going home” is more a figure of speech than a realistic option. More than 650,000 people are released from prison each year, and for many, finding a new home appears next to impossible, not just in the short term, but for the rest of their lives.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 148</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;[…] employers and their recruitment/staffing agencies routinely limit the pool of qualified candidates to those with spotless records, thus excluding millions of people from having the opportunity even to interview for jobs. Millions find themselves locked out of the legal economy, and no one with a record has a more difficult time getting hired than black men.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 154</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Throughout the United States, newly released prisoners are required to make payments to a host of agencies, including probation departments, courts, and child-support enforcement offices. In some jurisdictions, ex-offenders are billed for drug testing and even for the drug treatment they are supposed to receive as a condition of parole. These fees, costs, and fines are generally quite new—created by law within the past twenty years—and are associated with a wide range of offenses. Every state has its own rules and regulations governing their imposition. Florida, for example, has added more than twenty new categories of financial obligations for criminal defendants since 1996, while eliminating most exemptions for those who cannot pay.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 154</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Many states utilize “poverty penalties”—piling on additional late fees, payment plan fees, and interest when individuals are unable to pay all their debts at once, often enriching private debt collectors in the process. Some of the collection fees are exorbitant. Alabama charges a 30 percent collection fee, and Florida allows private debt collectors to tack on a 40 percent surcharge to the underlying debt.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 155</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Hurley’s attorney decried the trap she was in: “This is a situation where if this woman was able to write a check for the amount of the fine, she would be out of there. And because she can’t, she’s still in custody. It’s as simple as that.” Although she worked a full-time job while in custody, most of her income went to repay the diversion program, not the underlying fine that put her in custody in the first place. This harsh reality harks back to the days after the Civil War, when former slaves and their descendents were arrested for minor violations, slapped with heavy fines, and then imprisoned until they could pay their debts. The only means to pay off their debts was through labor on plantations and farms—known as convict leasing—or in prisons that had been converted to work farms.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 156</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;A black minister in Waterloo, Mississippi, explained his outrage at the fate that has befallen African Americans in the post–civil rights era. “It’s a hustle,” he said angrily. <strong>“‘Felony’ is the new N-word. They don’t have to call you a nigger anymore. They just say you’re a felon. In every ghetto you see alarming numbers of young men with felony convictions. Once you have that felony stamp, your hope for employment, for any kind of integration into society, it begins to fade out. Today’s lynching is a felony charge. Today’s lynching is incarceration. Today’s lynch mobs are professionals. They have a badge; they have a law degree. A felony is a modern way of saying, ‘I’m going to hang you up and burn you.’</strong> Once you get that F, you’re on fire.” (Emphasis added.)&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 164</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Poor people of color, like other Americans—indeed like nearly everyone around the world—want safe streets, peaceful communities, healthy families, good jobs, and meaningful opportunities to contribute to society. The notion that ghetto families do not, in fact, want those things, and instead are perfectly content to live in crime-ridden communities, feeling no shame or regret about the fate of their young men is, quite simply, racist. It is impossible to imagine that we would believe such a thing about whites.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 170</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;We condemn their baggy pants (a fashion trend that mimics prison-issue pants) and the music that glorifies a life many feel they cannot avoid. When we are done shaming them, we throw up our hands and then turn our backs as they are carted off to jail.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 172</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;<strong>When the system of mass incarceration collapses (and if history is any guide, it will), historians will undoubtedly look back and marvel that such an extraordinarily comprehensive system of racialized social control existed in the United States.</strong> How fascinating, they will likely say, that a drug war was waged almost exclusively against poor people of color—people already trapped in ghettos that lacked jobs and decent schools. They were rounded up by the millions, packed away in prisons, and when released, they were stigmatized for life, denied the right to vote, and ushered into a world of discrimination. Legally barred from employment, housing, and welfare benefits—and saddled with thousands of dollars of debt—these people were shamed and condemned for failing to hold together their families. They were chastised for succumbing to depression and anger, and blamed for landing back in prison. (Emphasis added.)&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 175</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The fact that Barack Obama can give a speech on Father’s Day dedicated to the subject of fathers who are “AWOL” without ever acknowledging that the majority of young black men in many large urban areas are currently under the control of the criminal justice system is disturbing, to say the least. What is more problematic, though, is that hardly anyone in the mainstream media noticed the oversight.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 180</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Today, the political fanfare and the vehement, racialized rhetoric regarding crime and drugs are no longer necessary. <strong>Mass incarceration has been normalized, and all of the racial stereotypes and assumptions that gave rise to the system are now embraced (or at least internalized) by people of all colors, from all walks of life, and in every major political party.</strong> (Emphasis added.)&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 181</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;<strong>It is simply taken for granted that, in cities like Baltimore and Chicago, the vast majority of young black men are currently under the control of the criminal justice system or branded criminals for life. This extraordinary circumstance—unheard of in the rest of the world—is treated here in America as a basic fact of life, as normal as separate water fountains were just a half century ago.</strong> (Emphasis added.)&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 181</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The widespread and mistaken belief that racial animus is necessary for the creation and maintenance of racialized systems of social control is the most important reason that we, as a nation, have remained in deep denial.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 183</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;And while all previous methods of control have blamed the victim in one way or another, the current system invites observers to imagine that those who are trapped in the system were free to avoid second-class status or permanent banishment from society simply by choosing not to commit crimes. <strong>It is far more convenient to imagine that a majority of young African American men in urban areas freely chose a life of crime than to accept the real possibility that their lives were structured in a way that virtually guaranteed their early admission into a system from which they can never escape.</strong> (Emphasis added.)&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 184</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The entrapment occurs in three distinct phases, each of which has been explored earlier, but a brief review is useful here. The first stage is the roundup. Vast numbers of people are swept into the criminal justice system by the police, who conduct drug operations primarily in poor communities of color. They are rewarded in cash—through drug forfeiture laws and federal grant programs—for rounding up as many people as possible, and they operate unconstrained by constitutional rules of procedure that once were considered inviolate. Police can stop, interrogate, and search anyone they choose for drug investigations, provided they get “consent.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 185</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;About 90 percent of those sentenced to prison for a drug offense in Illinois are African American. White drug offenders are rarely arrested, and when they are, they are treated more favorably at every stage of the criminal justice process, including plea bargaining and sentencing. Whites are consistently more likely to avoid prison and felony charges, even when they are repeat offenders. Black offenders, by contrast, are routinely labeled felons and released into a permanent racial undercaste.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 189</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The total population of black males in Chicago with a felony record (including both current and ex-felons) is equivalent to 55 percent of the black adult male population and an astonishing 80 percent of the adult black male workforce in the Chicago area.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 189</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;More than 70 percent of all criminal cases in the Chicago area involve a class D felony drug possession charge, the lowest-level felony charge. Those who do go to prison find little freedom upon release.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 189</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Formally race-neutral devices were adopted to achieve the goal of an all-white electorate without violating the terms of the Fifteenth Amendment. The devices worked quite well. Because African Americans were poor, they frequently could not pay poll taxes. And because they had been denied access to education, they could not pass literacy tests. Grandfather clauses allowed whites to vote even if they couldn’t meet the requirements, as long as their ancestors had been able to vote.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 192</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Under the usual-residence rule, the Census Bureau counts imprisoned individuals as residents of the jurisdiction in which they are incarcerated. Because most new prison construction occurs in predominately white, rural areas, white communities benefit from inflated population totals at the expense of the urban, overwhelmingly minority communities from which the prisoners come.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 193</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Rather than merely shunting black people to the other side of town or corralling them in ghettos, mass incarceration locks them in cages. Bars and walls keep hundreds of thousands of black and brown people away from mainstream society—a form of apartheid unlike any the world has ever seen.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 195</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Because the term white crime lacks social meaning, the term white criminal is also perplexing. In that formulation, white seems to qualify the term criminal—as if to say, “he’s a criminal but not that kind of criminal.” Or, he’s not a real criminal—i.e., not what we mean by criminal today.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 198</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;For the system to succeed—that is, for it to achieve the political goals described in chapter 1—black people must be labeled criminals before they are formally subject to control. <strong>The criminal label is essential, for forms of explicit racial exclusion are not only prohibited but widely condemned. Thus black youth must be made—labeled—criminals.</strong> (Emphasis added.)&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 200</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;As previously noted, poll taxes, literacy tests, and felon disenfranchisement laws were all formally race-neutral practices that were employed in order to avoid the prohibition on race discrimination in voting contained in the Fifteenth Amendment. These laws operated to create an all-white electorate because they excluded African Americans from the franchise but were not generally applied to whites. Poll workers had the discretion to charge a poll tax or administer a literacy test, or not, and they exercised their discretion in a racially discriminatory manner. Laws that said nothing about race operated to discriminate because those charged with enforcement were granted tremendous discretion, and they exercised that discretion in a highly discriminatory manner. <strong>The same is true in the drug war. Laws prohibiting the use and sale of drugs are facially race neutral, but they are enforced in a highly discriminatory fashion.</strong> (Emphasis added.)&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 201</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;As discussed in chapter 4, during Jim Crow, racial stigma contributed to racial solidarity in the black community. Racial stigma today, however—that is, the stigma of black criminality—has turned the black community against itself, destroyed networks of mutual support, and created a silence about the new caste system among many of the people most affected by it. The implications of this difference are profound. <strong>Racial stigma today makes collective action extremely difficult—sometimes impossible; whereas racial stigma during Jim Crow contained the seeds of revolt.</strong> (Emphasis added.)&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 202</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Racial violence has been rationalized, legitimated, and channeled through our criminal justice system; it is expressed as police brutality, solitary confinement, and the discriminatory and arbitrary imposition of the death penalty.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 202</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;[…] many whites during the Jim Crow era sincerely believed that African Americans were intellectually and morally inferior. They meant blacks no harm but believed segregation was a sensible system for managing a society comprised of fundamentally different and unequal people. The sincerity of many people’s racial beliefs is what led Martin Luther King Jr. to declare, “Nothing in all the world is more dangerous than sincere ignorance and conscientious stupidity.” <strong>The notion that racial caste systems are necessarily predicated on a desire to harm other racial groups, and that racial hostility is the essence of racism, is fundamentally misguided.</strong> Even slavery does not conform to this limited understanding of racism and racial caste. (Emphasis added.)&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 203</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;By and large, plantation owners were indifferent to the suffering caused by slavery; they were motivated by greed.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 204</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;<strong>We, as a nation, seem comfortable with 90 percent of the people arrested and convicted of drug offenses in some states being African American, but if the figure were 100 percent, the veil of colorblindness would be lost.</strong> We could no longer tell ourselves stories about why 90 percent might be a reasonable figure; nor could we continue to assume that good reasons exist for extreme racial disparities in the drug war, even if we are unable to think of such reasons ourselves. <strong>In short, the inclusion of some whites in the system of control is essential to preserving the image of a colorblind criminal justice system and maintaining our self-image as fair and unbiased people.</strong> Because most Americans, including those within law enforcement, want to believe they are nonracist, the suffering in the drug war crosses the color line. (Emphasis added.)&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 204</div></div><ul>
<li>What is an appropriate percentage of people in prison? In jail? On parole? In &ldquo;the system&rdquo;?</li>
<li>What is the ratio of historically privileged (white) to historically oppressed (black) prisoners?</li>
<li>How does that compare to the ratio in the overall population?</li>
<li>1/3 of black men can expect to go to prison in their lifetime</li>
<li>What percentage would be more acceptable?</li>
<li>What is the percentage for whites?</li>
<li>What percentage of the poor are incarcerated? The rich?</li>
<li>How does the ratio of those percentages compare to the ratio in the overall population?</li></ul><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;In fact, the number of deaths related to all illegal drugs combined was tiny compared to the number of deaths caused by drunk drivers. The total of all drug-related deaths due to AIDS, drug overdose, or the violence associated with the illegal drug trade, was estimated at 21,000 annually—less than the number of deaths directly caused by drunk drivers, and a small fraction of the number of alcohol-related deaths that occur every year.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 206</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;[…] most states adopted tougher laws to punish drunk driving. Numerous states now have some type of mandatory sentencing for this offense—typically two days in jail for a first offense and two to ten days for a second offense. Possession of a tiny amount of crack cocaine, on the other hand, carries a mandatory minimum sentence of five years in federal prison. The vastly different sentences afforded drunk drivers and drug offenders speaks volumes regarding who is viewed as disposable—someone to be purged from the body politic—and who is not. Drunk drivers are predominantly white and male. White men comprised 78 percent of the arrests for this offense in 1990 when new mandatory minimums governing drunk driving were being adopted. They are generally charged with misdemeanors and typically receive sentences involving fines, license suspension, and community service. <strong>Although drunk driving carries a far greater risk of violent death than the use or sale of illegal drugs, the societal response to drunk drivers has generally emphasized keeping the person functional and in society, while attempting to respond to the dangerous behavior through treatment and counseling. People charged with drug offenses, though, are disproportionately poor people of color. They are typically charged with felonies and sentenced to prison.</strong> (Emphasis added.)&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 206</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;In view of the nation’s treatment of predominately white drunk drivers and drug offenders, it is extremely difficult to imagine that our nation would have declared all-out war on drug offenders if the enemy had been defined in the public imagination as white.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 207</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The notion that African Americans support “get tough” approaches to crime is further complicated by the fact that “crime” is not a generic category. There are many different types of crime, and violent crime tends to provoke the most visceral and punitive response. Yet as we have seen in chapter 2, the drug war has not been aimed at rooting out the most violent drug traffickers, or so-called kingpins. The vast majority of those arrested for drug crimes are not charged with serious offenses, and most of the people in state prison on drug charges have no history of violence or significant selling activity. Those who are “kingpins” are often able to buy their freedom by forfeiting their assets, snitching on other dealers, or becoming paid government informants. Thus, to the extent that some African Americans support harsh policies aimed at violent offenders, they cannot be said to support the War on Drugs, which has been waged primarily against nonviolent, low-level offenders in poor communities of color.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 208</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Although African Americans do not engage in drug crime at significantly higher rates than whites, black men do have much higher rates of violent crime, and violent crime is concentrated in ghetto communities. Studies have shown that joblessness—not race or black culture—explains the high rates of violent crime in poor black communities. <strong>When researchers have controlled for joblessness, differences in violent crime rates between young black and white men disappear.</strong> (Emphasis added.)&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 210</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Civil rights advocates strenuously argued that it was the mentality and ideology that gave rise to Jim Crow that was the real source of the danger experienced by blacks. Of course they were right. But it is understandable why some blacks believed their immediate safety and security could best be protected by cooperation with the prevailing caste system. The fact that black people during Jim Crow were often complicit with the system of control did not mean they supported racial oppression.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 211</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;[…] complicity with the prevailing system of control may seem like the only option. Parents and schoolteachers counsel black children that, if they ever hope to escape this system and avoid prison time, they must be on their best behavior, raise their arms and spread their legs for the police without complaint, stay in failing schools, pull up their pants, and refuse all forms of illegal work and moneymaking activity, even if jobs in the legal economy are impossible to find. <strong>Girls are told not to have children until they are married to a “good” black man who can help provide for a family with a legal job. They are told to wait and wait for Mr. Right even if that means, in a jobless ghetto, never having children at all.</strong> When black youth find it difficult or impossible to live up to these standards—or when they fail, stumble, and make mistakes, as all humans do—shame and blame is heaped upon them. If only they had made different choices, they’re told sternly, they wouldn’t be sitting in a jail cell; they’d be graduating from college. <strong>Never mind that white children on the other side of town who made precisely the same choices—often for less compelling reasons—are in fact going to college.</strong> (Emphasis added.)&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 215</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Who becomes a social pariah and excommunicated from civil society and who trots off to college bears scant relationship to the morality of crimes committed. Who is more blameworthy: the young black kid who hustles on the street corner, selling weed to help his momma pay the rent? Or the college kid who deals drugs out of his dorm room so that he’ll have cash to finance his spring break? Who should we fear? The kid in the ’hood who joined a gang and now carries a gun for security, because his neighborhood is frightening and unsafe? Or the suburban high school student who has a drinking problem but keeps getting behind the wheel?&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 216</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;<strong>As legal scholar john a. powell once commented, only half in jest, “It’s actually better to be exploited than marginalized, in some respects, because if you’re exploited presumably you’re still needed.”</strong> (Emphasis added.)&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 219</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Rev. Al Sharpton captured the spirit of the protest when he stated boldly, “We’ve gone from plantations to penitentiaries. . . . They have tried to create a criminal justice system that particularly targets our young black men. And now we sit and stand in a city that says it’s a prank to hang a hangman’s noose, but that it is attempted murder to have a fight. We cannot sit by silently. That’s why we came, and that’s why we intend to keep coming.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 221</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;[…] civil rights organizations—like all institutions—are comprised of fallible human beings. The prevailing public consensus affects everyone, including civil rights advocates. Those of us in the civil rights community are not immune to the racial stereotypes that pervade media imagery and political rhetoric; nor do we operate outside of the political context. <strong>Like most people, we tend to resist believing that we might be part of the problem. One day, civil rights organizations may be embarrassed by how long it took them to move out of denial and do the hard work necessary to end mass incarceration.</strong> (Emphasis added.)&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 224</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;A prime example is the Rosa Parks story. Rosa Parks was not the first person to refuse to give up her seat on a segregated bus in Montgomery, Alabama. Civil rights advocates considered and rejected two other black women as plaintiffs when planning a test case challenging segregation practices: Claudette Colvin and Mary Louise Smith. Both of them were arrested for refusing to give up their seats on Montgomery’s segregated buses, just months before Rosa Parks refused to budge. Colvin was fifteen years old when she defied segregation laws.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 227</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;One reason so many people have a false impression of the economic well-being of African Americans, as a group, is that poverty and unemployment statistics do not include people who are behind bars. Prisoners are literally erased from the nation’s economic picture, leading standard estimates to underestimate the true jobless rate by as much as 24 percentage points for less-educated black men.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 228</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;During the much heralded economic boom of the 1990s, the true jobless rate among noncollege black men was a staggering 42 percent (65 percent among black male dropouts).&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 229</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;If we hope to return to the rate of incarceration of the 1970s—a time when many civil rights activists believed rates of imprisonment were egregiously high—we would need to release approximately four out of five people currently behind bars today. Prisons would have to be closed across America, an event that would likely inspire panic in rural communities that have become dependent on prisons for jobs and economic growth.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 230</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Even beyond private prison companies, a whole range of prison profiteers must be reckoned with if mass incarceration is to be undone, including phone companies that gouge families of prisoners by charging them exorbitant rates to communicate with their loved ones; gun manufacturers that sell Taser guns, rifles, and pistols to prison guards and police; private health care providers contracted by the state to provide (typically abysmal) health care to prisoners; the U.S. military, which relies on prison labor to provide military gear to soldiers in Iraq; corporations that use prison labor to avoid paying decent wages; and the politicians, lawyers, and bankers who structure deals to build new prisons often in predominately white rural communities—deals that often promise far more to local communities than they deliver. <strong>All of these corporate and political interests have a stake in the expansion—not the elimination—of the system of mass incarceration.</strong> (Emphasis added.)&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 231</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;[…] we hope to end this system of control, we cannot be satisfied with a handful of reforms. All of the financial incentives granted to law enforcement to arrest poor black and brown people for drug offenses must be revoked. Federal grant money for drug enforcement must end; drug forfeiture laws must be stripped from the books; racial profiling must be eradicated; the concentration of drug busts in poor communities of color must cease; and the transfer of military equipment and aid to local law enforcement agencies waging the drug war must come to a screeching halt.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 232</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Those who believe that advocacy challenging mass incarceration can be successful without overturning the public consensus that gave rise to it are engaging in fanciful thinking, a form of denial. Isolated victories can be won—even a string of victories—but <strong>in the absence of a fundamental shift in public consciousness, the system as a whole will remain intact.</strong> To the extent that major changes are achieved without a complete shift, the system will rebound. The caste system will reemerge in a new form, just as convict leasing replaced slavery, or it will be reborn, just as mass incarceration replaced Jim Crow. (Emphasis added.)&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 234</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;<strong>Few would openly argue that we should lock up millions of poor people just so that other people can have jobs or get a good return on their private investments.</strong> Instead, familiar arguments would likely resurface about the need to be “tough” on criminals, not coddle them or give “free passes.” <strong>The public debate would inevitably turn to race, even if no one was explicitly talking about.</strong> (Emphasis added.)&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 239</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The deeply flawed nature of colorblindness, as a governing principle, is evidenced by the fact that the public consensus supporting mass incarceration is officially colorblind. It purports to see black and brown men not as black and brown, but simply as men—raceless men—who have failed miserably to play by the rules the rest of us follow quite naturally. The fact that so many black and brown men are rounded up for drug crimes that go largely ignored when committed by whites is unseen.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 241</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Finally, this is not an argument that affirmative action should be reconsidered simply on the grounds that it is “unfair” to white men as a group. The empirical evidence strongly supports the conclusion that declining wages, downsizing, deindustrialization, globalization, and cutbacks in government services represent much greater threats to the position of white men than so-called reverse discrimination.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 245</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Affirmative action, particularly when it is justified on the grounds of diversity rather than equity (or remedy), masks the severity of racial inequality in America, leading to greatly exaggerated claims of racial progress and overly optimistic assessments of the future for African Americans.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 246</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Seeing black people graduate from Harvard and Yale and become CEOs or corporate lawyers—not to mention president of the United States—causes us all to marvel at what a long way we have come. <strong>As recent data shows, however, much of black progress is a myth.</strong> Although some African Americans are doing very well—enrolling in universities and graduate schools at record rates thanks to affirmative action—as a group, in many respects African Americans are doing no better than they were when Martin Luther King Jr. was assassinated and riots swept inner cities across America. (Emphasis added.)&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 246</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;[…] mass incarceration is predicated on the notion that an extraordinary number of African Americans (but not all) have freely chosen a life of crime and thus belong behind bars. A belief that all blacks belong in jail would be incompatible with the social consensus that we have “moved beyond” race and that race is no longer relevant. But a widespread belief that a majority of black and brown men unfortunately belong in jail is compatible with the new American creed, provided that their imprisonment can be interpreted as their own fault. <strong>If the prison label imposed on them can be blamed on their culture, poor work ethic, or even their families, then society is absolved of responsibility to do anything about their condition.</strong> (Emphasis added.)&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 248</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Whereas black success stories undermined the logic of Jim Crow, they actually reinforce the system of mass incarceration. Mass incarceration depends for its legitimacy on the widespread belief that all those who appear trapped at the bottom actually chose their fate.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 248</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Viewed from this perspective, affirmative action no longer appears entirely progressive. <strong>So long as some readily identifiable African Americans are doing well, the system is largely immunized from racial critique.</strong> (Emphasis added.)&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 248</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Reports that minority officers may engage in nearly as much racial profiling as white officers have been met with some amazement, but the real surprise is that some minority police officers have been willing to speak out against the practice, given the ferocity of the drug war. A war has been declared against poor communities of color, and the police are expected to wage it. Do we expect minority officers, whose livelihood depends on the very departments charged with waging the war, to play the role of peacenik?&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 250</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Remarkably, the Obama administration chose to increase funding for Byrne programs twelvefold not in response to any sudden spike in crime rates or any new studies indicating the effectiveness of these programs, but instead because handing law enforcement billions of dollars in cash is an easy, efficient jobs program in the midst of an economic crisis. The dramatically increased funding for Byrne grants was included as part of the Economic Reinvestment Act of 2009. While the channeling of stimulus dollars to law enforcement may help some police officers keep their jobs at a time when state and local budgets are being slashed, there is a cost. As New York Times columnist Charles Blow observed, “[it’s] a callous political calculus. . . . The fact that they are ruining the lives of hundreds of thousands of black and Hispanic men and, by extension, the communities they belong to barely seems to register.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 253</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;[…] could it be that many African Americans would actually prefer to ignore racial issues during Obama’s presidency, to help ensure him smooth sailing and a triumphant presidency, no matter how bad things are for African Americans in the meantime? The fact that the last question could plausibly be answered yes raises serious questions for the civil rights community.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 254</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;<strong>Malcolm X understood that the United States was created by and for privileged white men. It was white men who dominated politics, controlled the nation’s wealth, and wrote the rules by which everyone else was forced to live.</strong> No group in the United States can be said to have experienced more privilege, and gone to greater lengths to protect it, than “the white man.” (Emphasis added.)&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 255</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;As Lani Guinier points out, however, the racial liberalism expressed in the Brown v. Board of Education decision and endorsed by civil rights litigators “did not offer poor whites even an elementary framework for understanding what they might gain as a result of integration.” Nothing in the opinion or in the subsequent legal strategy made clear that segregation had afforded elites a crucial means of exercising social control over poor and working-class whites as well as blacks. <strong>The Southern white elite, whether planters or industrialists, had successfully endeavored to make all whites think in racial rather than class terms, predictably leading whites to experience desegregation, as Derrick Bell put it, as a net “loss.”</strong> (Emphasis added.)&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 256</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;[…] if meaningful progress is to be made, whites must give up their racial bribes too, and be willing to sacrifice their racial privilege. Some might argue that in this game of chicken, whites should make the first move. Whites should demonstrate that their silence in the drug war cannot be bought by tacit assurances that their sons and daughters will not be rounded up en masse and locked away. Whites should prove their commitment to dismantling not only mass incarceration, but all of the structures of racial inequality that guarantee for whites the resilience of white privilege. After all, why should “we” give up our racial bribes if whites have been unwilling to give up theirs? In light of our nation’s racial history, that seems profoundly unfair. <strong>But if your strategy for racial justice involves waiting for whites to be fair, history suggests it will be a long wait. It’s not that white people are more unjust than others. Rather it seems that an aspect of human nature is the tendency to cling tightly to one’s advantages and privileges and to rationalize the suffering and exclusion of others.</strong> This tendency is what led Frederick Douglass to declare that “power concedes nothing without a demand; it never has and it never will.” (Emphasis added.)&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 257</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;[…] we may still manage to persuade mainstream voters in the midst of an economic crisis that we have relied too heavily on incarceration, that prisons are too expensive, and that drug use is a public health problem, not a crime. But if the movement that emerges to end mass incarceration does not meaningfully address the racial divisions and resentments that gave rise to mass incarceration, and if it fails to cultivate an ethic of genuine care, compassion, and concern for every human being—of every class, race, and nationality—within our nation’s borders, including poor whites, who are often pitted against poor people of color, the collapse of mass incarceration will not mean the death of racial caste in America.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 258</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Inevitably a new system of racialized social control will emerge—one that we cannot foresee, just as the current system of mass incarceration was not predicted by anyone thirty years ago.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 258</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;[…] when a young man who was born in the ghetto and who knows little of life beyond the walls of his prison cell and the invisible cage that has become his life, turns to us in bewilderment and rage, we should do nothing more than look him in the eye and tell him the truth.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 262</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;We should tell him the same truth the great African American writer James Baldwin told his nephew in a letter published in 1962, in one of the most extraordinary books ever written, The Fire Next Time. With great passion and searing conviction, Baldwin had this to say to his young nephew: This is the crime of which I accuse my country and my countrymen, and for which neither I nor time nor history will ever forgive them, that they have destroyed and are destroying hundreds of thousands of lives and do not know it and do not want to know it. . . . It is their innocence which constitutes the crime. . . . <strong>This innocent country set you down in a ghetto in which, in fact, it intended that you should perish. The limits of your ambition were, thus, expected to be set forever. You were born into a society which spelled out with brutal clarity, and in as many ways as possible, that you were a worthless human being. You were not expected to aspire to excellence: you were expected to make peace with mediocrity.</strong> (Emphasis added.)&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 262</div></div>      </div>
      </div>
        <div class="footer">
    <div class="footer-data"><div class="footer-links"><ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/contact.php" title="">Contact</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/support.php" title="">Support</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/privacy.php" title="">Privacy</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/rights.php" title="">Rights</a></li></ul></div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="copyright">Copyright (c) 1999-2026 earthli.com. All Rights Reserved.</div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="versions">Powered by <ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore/app_news.php">earthli News 3.7</a></li><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore" title="">earthli WebCore&trade; 3.7</a></li></ul></div></div>    </div>
      </div>
  </div>  </body>
</html>
]]>
  </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
      <title type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[Based on a True Story: Not a Memoir by Norm Macdonald (2016) (read in 2017)]]>
  </title>
    <id>https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3430</id>
    <link href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3430"/>
    <updated>2017-07-25T21:44:54+02:00</updated>
    <author>
        <name type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[Marco von Ballmoos]]>
  </name>
      <uri>https://earthli.com/users/marco</uri>
    </author>
      <summary type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<blockquote class="quote abstract "><div>Disclaimer: these are notes I took while reading this book. They include citations I found interesting or enlightening or particularly well-written. In some cases, I&rsquo;ve pointed out which of these applies to which citation; in others, I have not. Any benefit you gain from reading these notes is... [<a class="complete-text-link" href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3430">More</a>]</div></blockquote>]]>
  </summary>
      <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<html lang="en">
  <head>
    <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/themes/ice.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/fonts/raleway.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/core/medium.css">
  </head>
  <body>
<div class="style-controls">  <div class="page">
    <div class="page-body">
<div class="info-box-top">
<p>
Published by <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_user.php?name=marco" title="Marco von Ballmoos" class="visible">marco</a> on <span class="date-time">25. Jul 2017 21:44:54 (GMT-5)</span>
</p>
<p>
Updated by <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_user.php?name=marco" title="Marco von Ballmoos" class="visible">marco</a> on <span class="date-time">28. Dec 2023 21:13:13 (GMT-5)</span>
</p>
</div>
      <div class="text-flow wide">
  <blockquote class="quote abstract "><div>Disclaimer: these are notes I took while reading this book. They include citations I found interesting or enlightening or particularly well-written. In some cases, I&rsquo;ve pointed out which of these applies to which citation; in others, I have not. Any benefit you gain from reading these notes is purely incidental to the purpose they serve of reminding me what I once read. Please see Wikipedia for a summary if I&rsquo;ve failed to provide one sufficient for your purposes. If my notes serve to trigger an interest in this book, then I&rsquo;m happy for you.</div></blockquote><p>Norm&rsquo;s purported autobiography is at-once multi-layered and tightly written. In few words, he paints a plethora of possibilities. The style is reminiscent of Twain, Vonnegut, Kafka and Burroughs. His stories—as was the case with these auspicious predecessors—are often seemingly inspired by hallucinogenic substances as well as completely fictitious—often bald-facedly so—and not at all autobiographical.</p>
<p>He is deeply funny. He is easily insightful. His writing is a pleasure to read. Some passages rear out of the work, standing alone as jewels of prosaic creation. He tells of his days and nights on the road, of his heroin and alcohol addiction, of his at-once madcap and lethargic friend, of his gambling addictions. He tells of growing up on an farm in Canada with the mysterious Old Jack, of his obsession with Sarah Silverman, his verbal sparring with Lorne Michaels, his simultaneous lack of and spectacular surfeit of success at comedy, his killer jokes that at-once cannot fail and always backfire.</p>
<p>His denouement or resurrection comes in the form of a ghost writer who emulates his employer to such a degree that the narrative line blurs and shifts and whipsaws, with Matryoshka-like nesting of ideas, plot-lines and authorial voices. Norm escapes to fight another day. Highly recommended.</p>
<h2>Citations</h2><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The plain truth is that Adam Eget is an alcoholic and that’s why he doesn’t drink. Me, I’m not an alcoholic and that’s why I do drink. Life sure is funny that way.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 9</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;“Oh, he was a sight to see. The rest of us, we all dressed in suit jackets and shoes like our dads wore, but Sam’s jacket was a long duster, and he always wore a bandana too. And when he talked, it was a wild shriek, but there was music in it. It put me in mind of a Pentecostal minister I’d seen once who hailed from West Texas and came up through the Ottawa Valley when I was a young boy—a man who handled snakes and talked unafraid.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 30</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Then the cat’s green eyes flashed black like the wing of a crow and her teeth tore into the mouse, and I could hear the tiny bones breaking as the cat’s neck swung from side to side until the mouse was still and limp, but the cat’s neck continued to swing. Then the cat slung the dead mouse into the short hay and strolled away. This last moment was what surprised and frightened me the most. This whole endeavor had nothing to do with food. And this is when I learned that hardscrabble truth: There is a difference between what a thing is and what it appears to be. A thing can appear to be content and happy as it lies with you so close that you feel its purr in your belly. And if you don’t look through the screen door and out into the world, you might never realize that the thing you think you know and love is another, more dangerous thing altogether.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 20</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;And when I looked inside, a curious thought struck me, a thought that made my fear evaporate and my tears dry. You see, Old Jack wasn’t lying in the casket; why, it wasn’t him at all. It was just something that looked like him, the same way a suit lying on a bed resembles the man once wore it. Old Jack was the best fellow I ever knew and I’d been with him as often as anyone, but I wasn’t with him that day, not there in that room, where a line of people stood waiting to look at a thing in a box.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 27</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;I don’t like it in the middle of the desert late at night. I know this is when the creatures emerge. They spend their days hiding from the merciless sun behind rocks and cactus, and it’s when the sun goes down that they make their living. In the black of night I can hear them, hungry, scrabbling over the rocks.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 31</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Sonofabitch, the drive was long. Why they built a hospital so damn far away from everybody, I couldn’t figure. It was way out in the middle of northern Ontario, where you have to pray your car doesn’t break down, and if it does, you have to pray you freeze to death before the timberwolves find you.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 35</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Oh, his name’s Fred Henshaw. He took his mother out to the cold northern tundra where the sun never sets and he cut off her eyelids. That way she couldn’t sleep or even shield her eyes from the sun. Then Fred had her wander around, tripping in the snow, falling, getting back up, falling again. Every day Fred would take a hypodermic needle and remove a half a pint of blood from the old lady. After about a week, his mother just lay down on the hard snow. Then he sat down and waited. Waited for the crows to come.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 36</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Don’t worry about that, Adam Eget. For idiots like you, they provide a ghostwriter. A ghostwriter is a man blessed with bright talent but cursed with dim luck. The brilliant ghostwriter will do all the work and receive a pittance, while you, an illiterate fool, will be given a king’s ransom. That’s God’s great joke, my son.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 49</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Julie had motioned me into her office that afternoon while Mr. Macdonald was telling a story about how he hated Eskimos. It was not so much a story, really, as a string of words that was randomly assembled, incoherent, unending, and filled with hate.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 63</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;That was a long time ago, so I take a deep, deep drag and hold the magic stuff in my lungs, although it fights to get out. Finally, I can’t take it anymore and I lean over and cough like hell. When I look up again, there it is. The past. It’s directly in my face, like a forgotten child who’s hunted me down to find out when I’ll be returning with that pack of cigarettes.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 68</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;And outside the Regency House, we all laughed loudly for different reasons in the cold autumn of New York.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 75</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;As you place your chips on the craps table, you feel anxiety and impatience. When the red dice hit the green felt with a thunk and you’re declared the winner and the chips are pushed toward you, you feel relief. Relief is all. And relief is fine, but hardly what a man would give the whole rest of his life to gain. It has to be something else, and the best I’ve come up with is this: It is a particular moment. A magic moment that occurs after the placing of a bet and before the result of that bet. It is after the red dice are thrown but before they lie still on the green felt where they fall. It is when the dice are in the air, and as long as they are there, time stops. As long as the red dice are in the air, the gambler has hope. And hope is a wonderful thing to be addicted to.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 113</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;I find my way through the casino and in a moment I am on the Strip. There is a dry chill that begins to freeze my naked face, and the buildings of iron and glass feel as immortal as the ancient streets they sit upon. I look above and the sun shining amid the blue sky and white, white clouds casts a pall of futility over the man-made monuments and their sickly neon light.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 115</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;And the Lord begins to speak His message, but just as He begins, a second wave of the drug hits me, much harder, and the sidewalk becomes quicksand beneath my feet and I sink into it, fast. I clutch at a lamppost and hold on hard so that the sidewalk does not swallow me and fill my lungs with sand. Around me I see, in a circle that grows ever smaller, a pack of wildcats sauntering nearer and nearer, and their green eyes shine and their white teeth are slick with saliva and their breath can be seen in the cold, cold air. Time that is beyond all human calculation passes, and a crash of thunder makes the mountain cats race up to the top of the Luxor hotel, where they fasten themselves like gargoyles to the top of the pyramid.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 116</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The boy had been alive nine years, which made him young, but he would only be alive for one more year, which made him old.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 122</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Sometimes, Doc, in the deepest dark of night, I awake in my bed and I turn to my right, and with horror I see some old lady lying on my arm. An old lady that I once loved, Doc, in whose flesh I once found splendor and now see only decay, an old lady who insults me by her very existence.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 124</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;And so I have one child now, a boy, whose name is Stephan Mikhailovitch Smokovnikov, and I tell you now, Doc, with great and deep shame, the terrible truth. I no longer love him. When I look into his eyes, all I see is the same cowardice that I see when I catch a glimpse of my own eyes in a mirror. It is this cowardice that keeps me living, Doc, that keeps me moving from place to place, saying hello and goodbye, eating though hunger has long left me, walking without destination, and, at night, lying beside the strange old lady in this burlesque of a life I endure.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 124</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;When it’s unexpected, death comes fast like a ravenous wolf and tears open your throat with a merciful fury. But when it’s expected, it comes slow and patient like a snake, and the doctor tells you how far away it is and when, exactly, it will be at your door. And when it will be at the foot of your bed. And when it will be on your flesh. It’s all right there on their clipboards.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 126</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;“Well, wouldn’t it be a better idea to let the audience decide whether it’s really funny?” “With all due respect, Lorne, I think that would be the worst thing we could possibly do. Believe me, I’ve been down that road before.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 128</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Women are attracted to funny men, it is often said. This is not true. It only appears this way because women laugh at everything a very handsome man says.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 129</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;As we waited to spot a seal, I played a game with the boy. We would look up at the white clouds above and find figures in them. “That one looks like a bird,” I said. “Yeah, it does, and look at that one. It looks like a man rubbing his nose,” he returned. “I don’t see it.” “You see the bottom of it. That’s the man’s chin and then his mouth is wide open.” And then I saw it. And we played this game for two days, and we saw alligators and pickles and trees and every sort of thing, all of them white and still and living in the cold and limitless sky.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 133</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;We’d only walked about fifty yards when a great weariness settled on me and I didn’t think I could go farther. Suddenly all I wanted to do was sleep. But Edward McClintock had warned me that the cold will trick a man and that sleep that sweetly beckons is not really sleep at all but the deeper thing.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 134</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;“If you cry, sir, then cry with envy and not pity. For the boy is in the clouds and he is one with the clouds. It is we who are left who are reminded on this unacceptable day that life is swift and yet we are blind to its mighty splendor, which can be found in the simplest of things. Things like a walk in the park, a conversation with a good friend, a deep rich coffee leavened with half cream and half milk and served in a sturdy mug—one with some heft—and, with it, a delicious cookie that’s white and has red jelly in the middle. Thank you for listening, and, due to the solemnity of the occasion, I would ask you to hold your applause.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 140: from an elegy for his young friend</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Afterward, I walked back alone down a long blacktop road, and it was cold, and in the sky there were white clouds, and they all looked like white clouds and nothing else.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 141</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Hey, Norm, how’d you get Weekend Update?” I’m out of cigarettes so I pour a few grains of liquid morphine into a glass pipe. I use a torch lighter that sends an obelisk of hard blue fire to attack the glass and make the morphine sizzle and spit like bacon grease. My mind begins a crazy dance. “Well, let me think, Adam Eget. Let me think.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 146</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Sarah had just announced she would be leaving the show. She said she could no longer live in New York, that she was being tormented day and night by some obsessive stalker. This caught me completely by surprise, as I had taken to hanging around Sarah’s apartment, hiding in the bushes day and night, watching her come and go, and I had never seen any signs of a stalker.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 146</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;11. In music news, number one on the college charts this week was Better than Ezra. And at number two: Ezra.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 158</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;15. Earlier this week, Marlon Brando met with Jewish leaders to apologize for comments he made on Larry King Live, among them that “Hollywood is run by Jews.” The Jewish leaders accepted the actor’s apology and announced that Brando is now free to work again.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 158</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;20. Dr. James Watts, a neurosurgeon who performed the first frontal lobotomy, died this week in Washington. If you recall, a lobotomy involves drilling holes in the skull and then inserting and rotating a knife to destroy brain cells. What a genius. He’ll be missed.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 159</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;24. A French man, who calls himself “The Human Snake,” was arrested this week after climbing up the side of a Manhattan high-rise. Yep, he climbed right up the side of a high-rise. Just like a snake!&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 160</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;We look out the window, out at the uncertainty of it all. The town looks torn to hell, with the young meth heads stumbling around and giggling and scratching at itches that never go away, and the old men, rum-drunk, driving golf carts aimlessly through the rubble. No one goes near the beach. The sand beside the Salton Sea cannot be seen. This is because it is covered a foot deep in the broken skeletons of dead fish. And the stench is everywhere.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 161</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Here we are with two goons standing by Adam Eget, another with a red duffel bag full of money, and the fat man with the artificial hair is acting like we’re in a legitimate bank doing legitimate business. But I don’t care; I’ll sign anything. My name is as worthless as a bent penny, and if it helps me to scribble it on a piece of paper, no problem. But when I look down at the document on the table, I understand. It’s a life-insurance policy he wants me to sign. It will, upon my passing, pay two million dollars to my beneficiary. And across the table from me, smiling like a crocodile with salt-caked teeth and handing me a pen, sits my beneficiary. “It came to me in a dream,” he says. I smile right back at him and sign the paper.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 164</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;“Well, Don, that’s because a jury of his peers found Mr. Simpson not guilty of all the charges filed against him. He’s as innocent as you or me. If I was to mention O.J. at all on the telecast, it would be to deliver a profound and heartfelt apology for the cruel, racist remarks I made in my self-appointed role as judge, jury, and executioner.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 194</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The funny thing is, the five-thousand-dollar chip was the very same size as the five-dollar chip. Probably cost the same to make. But it was worth a thousand times more.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 200</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;I was winning big time now. I began to feel an extraordinary transformation taking place deep within me, one that mirrored my chip’s transformation, for I felt myself double in value and then redouble and press to the maximum. I was the same exact size physically, and yet I was worth much more, a thousand times more,&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 200</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;I walked onto the boardwalk, my heart and pockets full. The people around me all looked small, and I knew that I was once like them but now I was different—same on the outside maybe, but a thousand times as bright, a thousand times as powerful, a thousand times what they were.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 200</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;I like having no phone and a phone-shaped hole in the window. The apartment can get pretty windy at night, but it doesn’t bother me. Nothing has bothered me since the day I awoke with the plan. It is just so perfectly rational. As you can see, I am not a romantic. No great writer is. But the public is a different story. A posthumous work can be highly appealing. A book that took twenty years to write, which was then summarily and callously rejected, causing its author to take his own life—now, that is downright irresistible. Add to this that the manuscript in question is top-notch literature and we have the makings of a tragedy. By ending my life, I will live forever.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 214</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;They are hiding, they say, from the fat man with the artificial hair. And they might well be. This fat man with the artificial hair may well kill us all. There is a problem, though. He may not exist. I may have made him up. I can’t be sure of anything anymore.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 221 by <cite>the hapless ghost writer</cite></div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Before I leave, I look in the mirror and am confronted by a slovenly fool. My eyes have gone blank, just like his. I am stunned for a moment. It has finally happened. I have become him. God help me, I have become him.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 222 by <cite>the hapless ghost writer</cite></div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;There is the way things are and then the way things appear, and it is the way things appear, even when false, that is often the truest. If I am remembered, it will always be by the four years I spent at Saturday Night Live and, maybe even more than that, by the events surrounding my departure from that show. As long as SNL exists, then so do I.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 229</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;It can be difficult to define yourself by something that happened so long ago and is gone forever. It’s like a fellow at the end of the bar telling no one in particular about the silver medal he won in high school track, the one he still wears around his neck.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 230</div></div><p>That&rsquo;s my metaphor for America.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The only thing an old man can tell a young man is that it goes fast, real fast, and if you’re not careful it’s too late. Of course, the young man will never understand this truth.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 230</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;But looking back now, I can see that my life since SNL has been a full sprint, trying with all my might to outrun the wolves of irrelevancy snapping at my heels. It has all been in vain, of course. They caught and devoured me years ago.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 230</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;And as for my gambling, it’s true I lost it all a few times. But that’s because I always took the long shot and it never came in. But I still have some time before I cross that river. And if you’re at the table and you’re rolling them bones, then there’s no money in playing it safe. You have to take all your chips and put them on double six and watch as every eye goes to you and then to those red dice doing their wild dance and freezing time before finding the cruel green felt.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 231</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;i just keep speaking words into the tape recorder because the faster i read the more words go into my book and each word is a part of my life even if the words dont make any sense because they dont have to because thats not in the contract. nobody ever said your life had to make a damn bit of sense just as long as it had enough words thats all.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 236</div></div>      </div>
      </div>
        <div class="footer">
    <div class="footer-data"><div class="footer-links"><ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/contact.php" title="">Contact</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/support.php" title="">Support</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/privacy.php" title="">Privacy</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/rights.php" title="">Rights</a></li></ul></div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="copyright">Copyright (c) 1999-2026 earthli.com. All Rights Reserved.</div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="versions">Powered by <ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore/app_news.php">earthli News 3.7</a></li><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore" title="">earthli WebCore&trade; 3.7</a></li></ul></div></div>    </div>
      </div>
  </div>  </body>
</html>
]]>
  </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
      <title type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[Divided: The Perils of Growing Inequality by David Cay Johnston (2014) (read in 2017)]]>
  </title>
    <id>https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3416</id>
    <link href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3416"/>
    <updated>2017-05-14T20:38:12+02:00</updated>
    <author>
        <name type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[Marco von Ballmoos]]>
  </name>
      <uri>https://earthli.com/users/marco</uri>
    </author>
      <summary type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<blockquote class="quote abstract "><div>Disclaimer: these are notes I took while reading this book. They include citations I found interesting or enlightening or particularly well-written. In some cases, I&rsquo;ve pointed out which of these applies to which citation; in others, I have not. Any benefit you gain from reading these notes is... [<a class="complete-text-link" href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3416">More</a>]</div></blockquote>]]>
  </summary>
      <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<html lang="en">
  <head>
    <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/themes/ice.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/fonts/raleway.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/core/medium.css">
  </head>
  <body>
<div class="style-controls">  <div class="page">
    <div class="page-body">
<div class="info-box-top">
<p>
Published by <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_user.php?name=marco" title="Marco von Ballmoos" class="visible">marco</a> on <span class="date-time">14. May 2017 20:38:12 (GMT-5)</span>
</p>
</div>
      <div class="text-flow wide">
  <blockquote class="quote abstract "><div>Disclaimer: these are notes I took while reading this book. They include citations I found interesting or enlightening or particularly well-written. In some cases, I&rsquo;ve pointed out which of these applies to which citation; in others, I have not. Any benefit you gain from reading these notes is purely incidental to the purpose they serve of reminding me what I once read. Please see Wikipedia for a summary if I&rsquo;ve failed to provide one sufficient for your purposes. If my notes serve to trigger an interest in this book, then I&rsquo;m happy for you.</div></blockquote><p>This book is a collection of essays and studies on many different facets and types of inequality: Income. Education, Health-Care, Debt and Poverty, Policy and Family. The title and sub-headings listed prior say it all, actually: this book is about the root of America&rsquo;s problem—Inequality. And not just income inequality, but wealth, opportunity, all of which add up to a purportedly democratic system that looks exactly like feudalism. You can read the essays in any order, but I read the book front to back. The book was published in 2014 and only one essay/study includes data from as recently as 2013. The others stretch back over decades, pinpointing the point when the U.S. left its path to turn the screws on its own populace. These essays show not only the problems we face, they show how we got here and what we need to do to get out of it. Spoiler alert: I bet we don&rsquo;t take any of their advice. Recommended.</p>
<h2>Citations</h2><p>From the introduction by the author:</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The resulting growth at the top has become so concentrated that between 2009, when the Great Recession ended, and 2012 just 16,000 households collected 31 percent of all the increased income in all of America with its 315 million people. That money went to the 1 percent of the 1 percent. The top 1 percent enjoyed 94.8 percent of all the increased income, with the small remainder going to the rest of the top 10 percent.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 2</div></div><p>From <em>Inequality and Democracy</em> by <em>Barack Obama</em></p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;And ever since, there’s been a raging debate over the best way to restore growth and prosperity, restore balance, restore fairness.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 2</div></div><p>Well, it certainly wasn&rsquo;t by punishing a single one of these people. Obama loves to talk like a bystander.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;As infuriating as it was for all of us, we rescued our major banks from collapse, not only because a full-blown financial meltdown would have sent us into a second depression, but because we need a strong, healthy financial sector in this country.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 11</div></div><p>There&rsquo;s that helpless bystander again.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;This is the law that we passed. We are in the process of implementing it now. All of this is being put in place as we speak. Now, unless you’re a financial institution whose business model is built on breaking the law, cheating consumers, and making risky bets that could damage the entire economy, you should have nothing to fear from these new rules.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 12</div></div><p>He&rsquo;s such a liar.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;It will require greater responsibility from home owners not to take out mortgages they can’t afford. They need to remember that if something seems too good to be true, it probably is.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 14</div></div><p>So patronizing. You mean, like a President who says he can fix everything?</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;This broader obligation can take many forms. At a time when the cost of hiring workers in China is rising rapidly, it should mean more CEOs deciding that it’s time to bring jobs back to the United States—not just because it’s good for business, but because it’s good for the country that made their business and their personal success possible.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 14</div></div><p>His whole approach to policy is to try to guilt creatures without conscience rather than passing laws to constrain them. He hopes they play nice, based on no historical supporting evidence.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Our success has never just been about survival of the fittest. It’s about building a nation where we’re all better off. We pull together. We pitch in. We do our part. We believe that hard work will pay off, that responsibility will be rewarded, and that our children will inherit a nation where those values live.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 15</div></div><p>Is he talking about the Amish?</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Today’s appliances are better made and last longer,…&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 21</div></div><p>I&rsquo;m not convinced that that&rsquo;s true.</p>
<p>From <em>How Gains at the Top Injure the Middle Class</em> by <em>Robert H. Frank</em>.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The median size of a newly constructed house in the United States was 1,600 square feet in 1980. By 2001, it was more than 2,100 square feet. Meanwhile, commutes were getting longer and roads more congested, savings rates were plummeting, personal bankruptcy filings were climbing to an all-time high, and there was at least a widespread perception of a sharp decline in employment security and autonomy.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 38</div></div><p>From <em>Wage Theft</em> by <em>Kim Bobo</em>.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Take the case of those whose jobs involve working in trenches—working in manholes or any confined space below ground level. Between 1985 and 1995, 522 workers in the United States were killed in trench-related mishaps, only 60 of whom worked for union shops. The other 462 were employed by nonunionized firms.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 58</div></div><p>But what percentage?</p>
<p>From <em>Home Depot&rsquo;s CEO-Size Tip</em> by <em>Barbara Ehrenreich</em>.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Home Depot sales clerks get about $8 to $10 an hour for lifting heavy objects and running around the floor all day; the CEO gets a total of almost $300 million for sinking the stock. We’re not talking about a rational system of rewards—just random acts of kindness, vast sums of money alighting when and where they will, generally in the outstretched hands of those who already have far too much.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 66</div></div><p>From <em>Why Do So Many Jobs Pay So Badly?</em> by <em>Christopher Jencks</em>.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The net result of all these changes is that while the economy grew dramatically between 1973 and 2004, most of the benefits went to those who needed them least: affluent, college-educated couples.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 69</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;which means that Americans are less likely to endorse policies for reducing wage inequality that involve government “meddling” in the marketplace.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 72</div></div><p>Should note that this is ill-informed. Meddling happens all the time, but to the benefit of the already-rich.</p>
<p>From <em>In The Heart of Our Economy and Our Lives</em> by <em>Beth Shulman</em>.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Put another way, jobs that require no education and training beyond high school except on-the-job training will account for 57 percent of the job growth between 2000 and 2010. <strong>Only 27 percent of U.S. jobs will require a bachelor’s degree or above.</strong> (Emphasis added.)&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 78</div></div><p>And yet Obama sold college as the only solution. Who was he addressing? Not most of America.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Educating and caring for young children pays low wages. Of the over 3 million child-care workers, including family child-care providers, more than 80 percent earn less than $8.50 an hour. One-third of the workers earn less than $5.75 an hour. The 1.2 million teacher’s assistants do no better. And these occupations are expected to grow in the next ten years by over 400,000. This workforce—98 percent of whom are female—has a higher concentration of jobs that are paid below the official poverty line than almost any other occupation in the United States. These jobs are clearly important and the workers skilled and educated; indeed, these workers are better educated than the general population. Almost a third of the child-care workers and teacher’s aides have a college or advanced degree, and 44 percent have some college. But because of the low pay, there is a 30–40 percent average annual turnover rate in the industry that hurts the quality of care provided to our children.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 82</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The noise is deafening. The floors are slippery with chicken grease. The smell of chicken blood fills the air. Workers standing in pools of water, hang, slice, split, pull, and cut chickens at breakneck speeds of ninety-one birds per minute. Standing close together in their hair nets, gloves, coats, and boots, they wield knives in temperatures ranging from freezing to 120 degrees. The plant runs twenty-four hours a day, working three continuous shifts. Workers are on the line six days a week, sometimes seven. These are the jobs that put chicken on our tables.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 82</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Poultry production employs more workers than any other segment of the meat industry, growing from 19,000 workers in 1947 to today’s 200,000 workers. Although an essential job, poultry-processing workers suffer poor wages (75 percent earn less than $8.50 an hour), minimal benefits, and harrowing working conditions. Their counterparts in the meat and fish industries face the same harsh conditions.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 84</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Three-fourths of the retail jobs pay less than $8.50 an hour. Compounding the low pay is the frequency of part-time schedules. Thirty-eight percent of retail employees work part-time. <strong>As a result, nearly two-thirds of the non-managerial workers earn less than $12,500 per year.</strong> (Emphasis added.)&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 88</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Yet a majority of the 1.5 million receptionists earn less than $8.50 an hour. The number of jobs in this field is expected to increase by over 400,000 in the next five years.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 89</div></div><p>From <em>Household Wealth Inequality</em> by <em>Edward N. Wolff</em>.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;In 1998, the top 1 percent of families as ranked by financial wealth owned 47 percent of the total (in contrast to 38 percent of total net worth). The top quintile, or fifth, accounted for 91 percent of total financial wealth, and the second quintile accounted for nearly all the remainder. <strong>The bottom 60 percent of Americans had virtually no financial wealth.</strong> (Emphasis added.)&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 93</div></div><p>From <em>Graduates vs. Oligarchs</em> by <em>Paul Krugman</em>.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Put it this way: having much of the wealth your state creates go to people who are in effect absentee landlords, whose income therefore shows up in another state’s statistics, doesn’t mean that you have an equal distribution of income. Out of state shouldn’t mean out of mind. Look, I understand that some people find the notion that we’ve become an oligarchy—with all that implies about class relations—disturbing. But that’s the way it is.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 118</div></div><p>From <em>Achievement Gap</em> by the <em>Editorial Projects of the Education Research Center</em>.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;It is most often used to describe the troubling performance gaps between African American and Hispanic students, at the lower end of the performance scale, and their non-Hispanic white peers, and the similar academic disparity between students from low-income families and those who are better off.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 130</div></div><p>So what&rsquo;s the answer? Try harder? Careful with the argument that the only way to change things is by winning a rigged game.</p>
<p>From <em>Back to School</em> by <em>Mike Rose</em>.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;How well are we preparing students from a broad sweep of backgrounds for life after high school, and how adequate are the programs we have in place to remedy the failures of K–12 education? How robust is our belief in the ability of the common person, and what opportunities do we provide to realize that ability? Given the nature of Western capitalism, what mechanisms are there to compensate for boom-and-bust economic cycles, for “creative destruction,” for globalization? Do we have an adequate social safety net, and how effective are we at providing people a second chance? How open and welcoming are our core institutions—such as postsecondary education—and how adaptable?&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 136</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Breaking the numbers out by race the author writes of “a national tragedy,” that “Black and White children grow up in entirely different economic worlds.” “Living up to our values,” the writer suggests, “requires policymakers . . . to focus on increasing upward relative mobility from the bottom.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 143</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The Economist, not as fiscally conservative as National Review but in the same free-market ballpark, put it even more strongly in another recent cover story. The writers say that the real danger to the American economy is chronic, ingrained joblessness that is related to our social and economic structure: tens of millions of young, marginally educated people who drift in and out of low-paying, dead-end jobs and older low-skilled displaced workers, unable to find employment as industries transform and jobs disappear. This situation places a huge and, if left alone, intractable drag on the economy.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 143</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;What is especially worthy of scrutiny is the role right-wing economic ideology is playing in these policy deliberations—and as the economy improves, the Right’s beliefs will still be a potent force in public policy. Antigovernment, anti–welfare state, antitax, this ideology forcefully undercuts broadscale public responses to hardship. Such responses are tarred as a “redistribution of wealth,” moving money, as Rep. Paul Ryan puts it, from the “makers” to the “takers.” <strong>Decisions are made on a ledger sheet profoundly bounded by simplistic assumptions about economics and opportunity and naive, often bigoted, beliefs about people who need help.</strong> (Emphasis added.)&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 144</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;I’ve been working with one group of students who begin classes at 7:00 A.M., then work, participate in student government, go to the library to study, and leave in the evening—usually by public transportation—to homes that are anything but stable (thus the refuge of the library). One young man is currently homeless, sleeping in his inoperable car parked at a friend’s family’s house. He’s at school every day by 6:00 A.M. to clean up and get his day in order. Of course there are people at their school who are drifting, drawing what resources they can, sometimes deluding themselves, sometimes consciously gaming the system. Allow me to note that the students I’m mentoring can point them out in a heartbeat—because they are not the norm. Furthermore, and it’s a sign of the times that I even have to write this, such behaviors appear across the socioeconomic landscape. The deplorable thing is the degree to which moral and character flaws are disproportionately attributed to poor people. But if you are able to penetrate the ideological fog and actually enter other people’s lives, you’ll witness a quite different and much more complex human reality.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 146</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The Right’s stories present a world stripped of the physical and moral insult of poverty. Characters move upward, driven by self-reliance, optimism, faith, responsibility. Though there might be an occasional reference to teachers or employers who were impressed with the candidate’s qualities, the explanations for the candidate’s achievements rest pretty much within his or her individual spirit.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 147</div></div><p>From <em>Educational Quality and Equality</em> by <em>Linda Darling-Hammond</em>.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Those who are undereducated can no longer access the labor market. While the United States must fill many of its high-tech jobs with individuals educated overseas, a growing share of its own citizens are unemployable and relegated to the welfare or prison systems. The nation can ill afford to maintain the structural inequalities in access to knowledge and resources that produce persistent and profound barriers to educational opportunity for large numbers of its students.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 154</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Recent analyses of data prepared for school finance cases in Alabama, California, Massachusetts, New Jersey, New York, Louisiana, South Carolina, and Texas have found that on every tangible measure—from qualified teachers and class sizes to textbooks, computers, facilities, and curriculum offerings—schools serving large numbers of students of color have significantly fewer resources than schools serving mostly white students&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 155</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;[…] these compounded inequalities explain much of the achievement gap that has often been attributed to genetic differences in intelligence or child-rearing practices or a “culture of poverty,” rather than to the distribution of opportunity itself.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 157</div></div><p>From <em>Inequality Kills</em> by <em>Stephen Bezruchka</em>.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Creating awareness and understanding of the basic problems constraining our achievement of better health will be a major challenge. Americans as a people simply have not been good at evaluating information in a critical manner. A very successful ploy of advertisers is the endless repetition of simple statements that stick in people’s minds. That process of “manufacturing consent” has been used widely in political spheres as well; a few years ago the widely repeated slogan “Iraq Has Weapons of Mass Destruction” had the public enraged, supporting the invasion of Iraq despite any evidence to support the accusation.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 196</div></div><p>From <em>Jailed for Being in Debt</em> by <em>Chris Serres and Glenn Howatt</em>.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The debts—often five or six years old—are purchased from companies like cell-phone providers and credit-card issuers, and cost a few cents on the dollar. Using automated dialing equipment and teams of lawyers, the debt-buyer firms try to collect the debt, plus interest and fees. A firm aims to collect at least twice what it paid for the debt to cover costs. Anything beyond that is profit.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 205</div></div><p>Why are creditors allowed to us public forces to collect debts? Why are they even allowed to re-awaken old, long-forgotten, long-dead debts? What societal function does this serve? What does it even mean to &ldquo;have the money&rdquo;? What if that money is earmarked for other, more-pressing needs than paying off a ten-year–old debt? (As is very likely the case.)</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Few debtors realize they can land in jail simply for ignoring debt-collection legal matters. Debtors also may not recognize the names of companies seeking to collect old debts. Some people are contacted by three or four firms as delinquent debts are bought and sold multiple times after the original creditor writes off the account.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 206</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;“It’s arbitrary,” he conceded. “The bigger question is: Should you be allowed to get an order from a court for someone to be arrested because they owe money? You’ve got to remember there are people who have the money but just won’t pay a single penny.” If friends or family post a debtor’s bail, they can expect to kiss the money goodbye, because it often ends up with creditors, who routinely ask judges for the bail payment.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 209</div></div><p>From <em>Georgia&rsquo;s Hunger Games</em> by <em>Neil deMause</em>.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;federal rules that, regardless of who’s in the White House, give states the leeway to use the 1996 law’s requirement for “work activities” to slam the door in the face of their neediest. This has created a land that welfare forgot, where a collection of private charities struggle to fill the resulting holes.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 220</div></div><p>Bill Clinton&rsquo;s legacy.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Kelda O’Neal, a young grandmother currently caring for an extended family of fifteen in her DeKalb County home, had a similar experience. “They treat you like you’re in a jail facility,” she said. O’Neal received benefits until her husband, a truck driver, applied for disability after suffering a mental breakdown following the murder of his daughter. He was told he would have to first attend sixty to ninety days of a state work program. When he missed one appointment, the state not only rejected him, but ended her $133 in monthly benefits as well.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 222</div></div><p>Man, have I got it good.</p>
<p>From <em>Living Down to Expectations</em> by <em>Stephen Pimpare</em>.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;I have no mercy or compassion in me for a society that will crush people, and then penalize them for not being able to stand up under the weight. —Malcolm X&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 226</div></div><p>From <em>How Economics is Biased Toward the Rich</em> by <em>Moshe Adler</em>.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Pope Leo XIII was moved enough by the prevailing economic disparity that in 1891 he issued an encyclical letter, Rerum Novarum [Of New Things], which was devoted to “The Condition of the Working Classes,” and in which he wrote: “The whole process of production as well as trade in every kind of goods has been brought almost entirely under the power of a few, so that a very few rich and exceedingly rich men have laid a yoke almost of slavery on the unnumbered masses of non-owning workers.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 237</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The economist Abba Lerner (1903–82) noted that Bentham was just applying the first principle of statistics: when it is not known that things that appear the same are really different, the best we can do is to assume that they are the same. This is why, with gambling dice, we assign the probability of 1/6 to each face of a die.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 239</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Unlike Bentham or Lerner, Pareto did not concern himself with the question of how likely it was that redistribution would hurt the rich more than it would help the poor. For him this theoretical possibility, no matter how remote, was reason enough to reject the level of equality as a yardstick of economic efficiency. And based solely on this theoretical possibility, the entire economics profession removed the distribution of resources from its definition of economic efficiency and replaced it with Pareto’s own definition.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 239</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;According to him, an allocation of resources is efficient if it cannot be changed in a way that will make at least one person better off without making anybody else worse off. This definition is indifferent to the distribution of society’s resources. Today we call this Pareto efficiency, but economists usually omit the name Pareto. They equate efficiency with Pareto efficiency, ignoring the existence of competing definitions, including that of Utilitarian efficiency.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 239</div></div><p>From <em>Don&rsquo;t Drink the Kool-Aid</em> by <em>Robert Kuttner</em>.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The stock-market bubble of the late 1990s induced investors to put vast resources into enterprises that never paid back a nickel of return; they only lined the pockets of insiders. If the government squandered money on this scale, conservatives and conservative investment bankers would be up in arms. But they’re not, of course. <strong>When the government wastes hundreds of dollars, they tell us it’s an outrage; when the market wastes trillions of dollars, it’s a lamentable glitch. This is not economics. This is ideology, pure and simple.</strong> (Emphasis added.)&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 247</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;We could have had a brand of globalization in which the ability to sell products to the United States depended on meeting certain social minimums, involving wages, organizing rights, environmental standards, treatment of children, and so on. But because that was not the globalization that corporate America sought, it is not what has evolved.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 248</div></div><p>From <em>Social Security Reduces Inequality—Efficiently, Effectively, and Fairly</em> by <em>Nancy Altman and Eric Kingson</em>.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;One change we believe should be made is increasing the maximum amount of wages on which Social Security’s contributions are assessed. Contributions are assessed only on the wages that are insured against loss.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 256</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Other streams of revenue that could eliminate Social Security’s projected shortfall while addressing income inequality would be a modest tax on annual incomes above $1 million, or a modest tax on financial speculation.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 256</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The case for expanding Social Security is strong. It is more efficient, secure, universal, and fair in its distribution than any private-sector counterpart is or could ever be, no matter how structured. The reason? Wage insurance works best when all workers are covered under the same plan and the coverage starts at the beginning of their working lives. The only entity that can mandate this kind of universal program is the federal government and it has.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 258</div></div><p>It&rsquo;s the same for Medicare.</p>
<p>From <em>Arguments For and Against Income Inequality</em> by <em>Thomas L. Hungerford</em>.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;But by far the largest contributor to increasing income inequality, regardless of how inequality is measured, is changes in income from capital gains and dividends. Policies that further concentrate capital ownership at or near the top of the income distribution will thus increase income inequality.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 263</div></div><p>From <em>Inequality of Hazard</em> by <em>Frank Ackerman and Lisa Heinzerling</em>.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The economists who originally came up with the idea of pollution trading, more than thirty years ago, would not have been surprised to learn that the California trading program created heavily polluted “hot spots.” In fact, they thought something like this might happen, and embraced the idea. In their naive optimism, they thought that local variation in pollution levels would be associated with freedom of choice, not with inequality of power and income.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 266</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;This kind of logic was made infamous in a 1991 memo circulated by Lawrence Summers (who later became Treasury secretary and later still president of Harvard University) when he was the chief economist at the World Bank. Discussing the migration of “dirty industries” to developing countries, Summers’s memo explained: The measurements of the costs of health-impairing pollution depend on the foregone earnings from increased morbidity and mortality. From this point of view a given amount of health-impairing pollution should be done in the country with the lowest cost, which will be the country with the lowest wages. <strong>I think the economic logic behind dumping a load of toxic waste in the lowest-wage country is impeccable and we should face up to that.</strong>&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 270</div></div><p>Obama&rsquo;s go-to economics advisor: what a monster. Unless he was kidding? I don&rsquo;t think he was kidding…</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;After this memo became public, Brazil’s then–secretary of the environment Jose Lutzenburger wrote to Summers: “Your reasoning is perfectly logical but totally insane. . . . Your thoughts [provide] a concrete example of the unbelievable alienation, reductionist thinking, social ruthlessness and the arrogant ignorance of many conventional ‘economists’ concerning the nature of the world we live in.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 271</div></div><p>From <em>A Different Kind of Epidemic</em> by <em>Ernest Drucker</em>.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The very large scale of incarceration in America defines its great public health significance, with tens of millions affected. The magnitude of our prison system has effectively made this country the world champion of incarceration. Today, the United States has the highest rate of imprisonment of any nation in the world—possibly the highest rate in the history of any nation. By comparison, European countries average less than one-fifth of the American rate, and many average only one-tenth of it. <strong>The U.S. rate of incarceration is the highest in the world—about 750 per 100,000—a rate more than seven times that of European Union countries and greater than that of Russia or South Africa.</strong> (Emphasis added.)&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 278</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;But many of the sentencing policies that first built and filled these prisons continue unabated (fourteen states increased prison populations in 2010), with the focus of law enforcement increasingly shifting to lower-level offenses (e.g., <strong>marijuana arrests are up 5,000 percent in the last decade</strong>).&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 280</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Clear argues that massive levels of arrest and imprisonment concentrated in certain communities damage the social bonds that sustain life, especially for poor communities. By corroding or destroying this most common basis of social capital, mass incarceration sets up a perverse relationship: punishment leads to increased crime, as it replaces the moral mechanisms of family and community. These are the forces that normally function to assert social control, over young males especially, by the use of noncoercive means involving family and community. Furthermore, because so much money is diverted to incarceration, other public services that might play a role in keeping down crime in these communities are defunded in favor of funding to build and maintain more prisons. Programs including health care, job training, retirement benefits, housing, and community development have all suffered a loss of public revenues, even as funding allocated for mass incarceration has grown exponentially. All these are worsened by the economic downturn that began in 2008 and which further restricts ex-prisoners’ options.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 281</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Individuals who enter prison and become a case in the criminal-justice system today have a 50 percent or more chance of remaining under the system’s control for life with recurrent arrests and periods of incarceration.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 282</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Like the story of global warming and climate change, this epidemic of mass imprisonment includes many “inconvenient truths”—critical realities we do not care to know about—such as its sheer size, huge social disparities, and monumental costs. But unlike climate change, the scale and consequences of mass incarceration derive from relatively recent events and a deliberate set of public policies that continue to be defended as being in the public interest.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 282</div></div><p>From <em>Prison&rsquo;s Dilemma</em> by <em>Glenn C. Loury</em>.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Put it all together and look at what we have wrought. We have established what looks to the entire world like a racial caste system that leaves millions stigmatized as pariahs, living either behind bars or in conditions of concentrated crime and poverty that breed still more criminality. Why are we doing this?&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 286</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;I am not saying that a criminal has no agency in his behavior. Rather, I am arguing that the larger society is implicated in a criminal’s choices because we have acquiesced to social arrangements that work to our benefit and to his detriment—that shape his consciousness and his sense of identity in a way that the choices he makes (and that we must condemn) are nevertheless compelling to him.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 287</div></div><p>From <em>Race, Gender, Family Structure, and Poverty</em> by <em>Peter Edleman</em>.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Between 1970 and 2009, the percentage of families headed by women with children under eighteen doubled—from 12.7 percent to 25.4 percent. For African American families the numbers rose from 37.1 percent in 1971 (the first year the statistics were broken down by race) to 52.7 percent in 2009. Most of these increases occurred during the 1970s. Reflecting these changes—and coupled with the increase in low-wage jobs and consequent difficulty for a single mother to support her family—the proportion of poor children under eighteen who lived in female-headed families rose from 24.1 percent in 1959 to 55 percent in 2010.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 296</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;One reason why so many African American women are coping on their own in raising their children is what the criminal-justice system does to the men of the community, especially in the inner city. <strong>The massive and unnecessary imprisonment of African American men is preventing two-parent families from forming and destroying others on a large scale.</strong> (Emphasis added.)&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 298</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The solutions are not simple. The aim is to postpone childbearing until the partners marry or establish a long-term commitment to each other and have a realistic economic approach to making it work. Hackneyed slogans, shibboleths, or bumper-sticker simplicities will not suffice: improved educational and employment opportunities are critical, as are criminal-justice reform and strategies to build healthy neighborhoods. But programs at the community level that stress postponing parenthood and that support responsible parenthood should it still occur are essential as well, although, granted, messages about the wisdom of delaying parenthood are more likely to be heeded in a world in which there are viable escape routes out of poverty.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 299</div></div><p>From <em>Employed Parents Who Can&rsquo;t Make a Living</em> by <em>Lisa Dodson</em>.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;On this day, the five men and two women started examining an idea that reemerged in employer conversations over the years that followed. <strong>They raised the notion that if you pay people wages that guarantee they can’t really “keep things organized at home” and then, because of that, the flow of work is disrupted, well, is that only the employee’s problem?</strong> (Emphasis added.) Or is it just built into this labor market? And if it is wired into America’s jobs, as Ellen, a middle-aged white woman, asked the others, “do we have any responsibility for what happens to them?” Over the course of hundreds of interviews and discussions this question was often at the center.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 306</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Today, one in four U.S. workers earns less than $9 an hour—about $19,000 per year; <strong>39 percent of the nation’s children live in low-income households.</strong> (Emphasis added.)&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 306</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Essentially, this is the argument that other nations use to invest public funding in families raising children and guarantee a minimum family income. So there is a defensible set of arguments—albeit not a winning one in the United States, but a compelling one—that we ought to pay people a decent income because it takes care of our people, serves productivity, and upholds the nation as a whole.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 308</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;<strong>This idea of work was almost always explained to me personally, not as a philosophical stand. Middle-income people would describe relationships with others at work whose earnings were so low that if you decided to think about it, you knew there was no way they could support a family.</strong> (Emphasis added.) Managers, business owners, and other professionals told me about getting to know certain people who seemed to be doing everything they possibly could, but that wasn’t enough. And so all kinds of personal and family troubles would mount up, spill over, and eventually turn up at work. I heard about how when you hire, supervise, or even just work next to working-poor people—and, like it or not, get close to them—the harms they live with can start leaking into your world too.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 308</div></div>      </div>
      </div>
        <div class="footer">
    <div class="footer-data"><div class="footer-links"><ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/contact.php" title="">Contact</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/support.php" title="">Support</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/privacy.php" title="">Privacy</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/rights.php" title="">Rights</a></li></ul></div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="copyright">Copyright (c) 1999-2026 earthli.com. All Rights Reserved.</div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="versions">Powered by <ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore/app_news.php">earthli News 3.7</a></li><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore" title="">earthli WebCore&trade; 3.7</a></li></ul></div></div>    </div>
      </div>
  </div>  </body>
</html>
]]>
  </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
      <title type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[Rigged: How Globalization and the Rules of the Modern Economy Were Structured to Make the Rich Richer by Dean Baker (2016) (read in 2017)]]>
  </title>
    <id>https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3393</id>
    <link href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3393"/>
    <updated>2017-04-02T18:47:06+02:00</updated>
    <author>
        <name type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[Marco von Ballmoos]]>
  </name>
      <uri>https://earthli.com/users/marco</uri>
    </author>
      <summary type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<blockquote class="quote abstract "><div>Disclaimer: these are notes I took while reading this book. They include citations I found interesting or enlightening or particularly well-written. In some cases, I&rsquo;ve pointed out which of these applies to which citation; in others, I have not. Any benefit you gain from reading these notes is... [<a class="complete-text-link" href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3393">More</a>]</div></blockquote>]]>
  </summary>
      <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<html lang="en">
  <head>
    <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/themes/ice.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/fonts/raleway.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/core/medium.css">
  </head>
  <body>
<div class="style-controls">  <div class="page">
    <div class="page-body">
<div class="info-box-top">
<p>
Published by <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_user.php?name=marco" title="Marco von Ballmoos" class="visible">marco</a> on <span class="date-time">2. Apr 2017 18:47:06 (GMT-5)</span>
</p>
<p>
Updated by <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_user.php?name=marco" title="Marco von Ballmoos" class="visible">marco</a> on <span class="date-time">2. Apr 2017 21:17:51 (GMT-5)</span>
</p>
</div>
      <div class="text-flow wide">
  <blockquote class="quote abstract "><div>Disclaimer: these are notes I took while reading this book. They include citations I found interesting or enlightening or particularly well-written. In some cases, I&rsquo;ve pointed out which of these applies to which citation; in others, I have not. Any benefit you gain from reading these notes is purely incidental to the purpose they serve of reminding me what I once read. Please see Wikipedia for a summary if I&rsquo;ve failed to provide one sufficient for your purposes. If my notes serve to trigger an interest in this book, then I&rsquo;m happy for you.</div></blockquote><p>Dean Baker puts together a comprehensive program to address massive inequality in America. The same inexorable and relatively straightforward logic could easily apply to other countries as well. The only problem with Baker&rsquo;s suggestions is that they utterly fail to benefit the masters of the universe. Still, his proposals for addressing the real issues facing the American economy are breathtakingly easily explained. He lays out his plan without regard for political interest or ideology. He explains how an economy does not exist in some sort of natural state—that it is the creation of explicit policy. This is perhaps his most important point. Anyone who claims that the system that they prefer, which just happens to benefit them immensely, is also the morally pure one because it is &ldquo;natural&rdquo;—is full of shit.</p>
<p>Baker explains in detail which parts of the economy are actually productive and which are just collecting rent. There are vast parts of the economy that could be trimmed, with quite significant effects for the majority. For example, the financial industry, including what used to be traditional banking, is almost purely rent-seeking, providing no substantial or commensurate value. Another area is healthcare, where the U.S. pays twice as much per person as any other first-world nation. Or professions, like dentistry, medicine or law, where salaries are twice as high as in other nations (at least). Out-of-control CEO pay and the twisted incentives and controls of the boards of large corporations is another area where a rational cleanup would yield giant gains. Then there are copyrights and patents, which are government-granted monopolies—again, not a natural outgrowth of a so-called free-market system.</p>
<p>All told, Baker&rsquo;s book illustrates in no uncertain terms the astounding degree—it&rsquo;s nearly total—with which the benefits of increased productivity and income have been collected and funneled to a handful of rich people. All the while, they pay everyone in the intelligentsia and media to convince the sheep that this is just a natural result of them being so much better. It&rsquo;s all bullshit.</p>
<p>Economies are human constructions and the one we currently enjoy has been constructed by the winners to benefit those winners. The first step is to open your eyes. Baker&rsquo;s book will help immensely. Highly recommended.</p>
<h2>Citations</h2><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Bill Clinton would have much less need to fly around the world for the Clinton Foundation had he not inserted the TRIPS (Trade Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights) provisions in the World Trade Organization (WTO) that require developing countries to adopt U.S.-style patent protections.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 5</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;In short, there is no truth to the story that the job loss and wage stagnation faced by manufacturing workers in the United States and other wealthy countries was a necessary price for reducing poverty in the developing world.[5] This is a fiction that is used to justify the upward redistribution of income in rich countries.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 7</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Markets are never just given. Neither God nor nature hands us a worked-out set of rules determining the way property relations are defined, contracts are enforced, or macroeconomic policy is implemented. These matters are determined by policy choices. The elites have written these rules to redistribute income upward. Needless to say, they are not eager to have the rules rewritten — which means they also have no interest in even having them discussed.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 9</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The position of “deregulators” effectively amounted to arguing that they should not have to pay for the insurance they were receiving.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 11</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;This means that the share of the 1 percent has more than doubled from its level during most of the period of the 1950s to 1980. Measured as a share of total income, this increase is roughly 10.0 percentage points. This would be sufficient to increase the income of everyone in the bottom 90 percent of the income distribution by more than 20 percent. It would be almost enough to double the income of the bottom 40 percent. In short, this upward redistribution has had a substantial impact on the living standards of the rest of the population.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 14</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;A basic point of economic theory that economists don’t like to talk about is that reducing the rents going to a high-income person is a gain for the rest of us. This is a crucial point, since it is necessary to recognize that policies designed to reduce the incomes of high-end earners are not just a matter of being gratuitously nasty to those who were lucky enough to be successful. Whether or not these policies are nasty, it is important to recognize that the money enjoyed by these high-end earners comes from somewhere; it is not manna from heaven. And where it comes from is the pockets of the rest of us.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 18</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;However, if the market distribution is indeed dependent on macroeconomic factors, like how close the economy is to its full-employment level of output, then we lose this independent point of reference. The distribution of income is then dependent on macroeconomic policies that determine the nearness to full employment. The market distribution is then inherently a function of policy decisions — there is no independent point of reference.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 26</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The basic logic behind this system was that, if the government is willing make up lost pay of workers when they are completely unemployed, why not pay workers when they are partially unemployed as a result of a reduction in work hours?[15]&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 33</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Specifically, because health care insurance is mostly an employment-based benefit, rather than universally provided through the government, employers typically see it as a fixed cost per worker. So rather than hiring additional workers and paying for their health insurance, employers would generally prefer their existing workforce to work more hours.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 35</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;If the average work year in the United States were comparable to those in Western Europe, more workers would be employed at relatively well-paying jobs in sectors like manufacturing, construction, and communications instead of being forced to accept lower-paying jobs in sectors like retail and restaurants. By reducing the supply of workers in the lower-paying sectors, the reduction in average hours would lead to higher wages in low-paying sectors for the workers who were left behind. In short, it is reasonable to believe that the longer average work year in the United States has been a factor contributing to inequality.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 36</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The beneficiaries of the upward redistribution may like the outcome, but it is not because they prefer leaving matters to the market. Rather, they prefer government interventions that have the effect of giving them more money.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 36</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Washington is filled with politicians and organizations that hyperventilate about government debt and the burden it imposes on our children, but they ignore the burdens imposed by patent and copyright monopolies granted by the government.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 38</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;That is the effect of various types of budget rules. They are not imposing some principle of neutrality or non-intervention, they are just making it more difficult to understand the government’s role in the economy.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 40</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;As the Fed restricted the growth of the M2 measure of money, the banking system developed new systems of payments that were not counted in M2.[18] As a result, the Fed could meet its targets for M2 but not accomplish its goal of restricting the effective supply of money.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 40</div></div><p>The lukas rule again à la Mark Blyth</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;As research from the IMF and elsewhere indicate, this upward redistribution leads to lower consumption, other things equal, since the wealthy spend a smaller share of their income than do the poor and middle class. Without deliberate government policy to boost demand, the result is a shortfall in demand.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 46</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The idea that a large financial sector might be a drag on growth has been supported by recent research&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 58</div></div><p>But everyone wants to benefit from the windfall for themselves. They don&rsquo;t care what they do to get it. They just want to make a lot of money.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Contrary to what is often claimed, breaking up the banks would not be a complex administrative task. The government should not be micromanaging the project; the banks could do it themselves. The banks know their business and have an incentive to break themselves up in a way that maximizes shareholder value. The government need only set size caps and a timeline, as well as penalties for not meeting the timeline. The banks can figure out how best to downsize themselves.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 69</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The “buyer beware” argument in this story means that consumers would have to spend much more time reviewing contracts and that firms would devote more resources to deceiving customers. That is hardly an economically optimal outcome.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 72</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Since they are non-voting, the shares would give the government no control: the goal is to secure a claim to corporate profits, not to run companies. Apart from issues of control, the government’s shares would be treated just like other shares of common stock. If the company pays a dividend of $2 a share on its common stock, then it would also pay $2 a share on the stock held by the government. If it buys back 10 percent of outstanding shares at $100 per share, then it would buy back 10 percent of the shares held by the government at $100 per share. If a private equity firm buys out the company, paying $120 per share, then it would pay $120 for each share held by the government.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 73</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The Bayh-Dole Act of 1980 allowed for universities, research institutions, private companies, and individuals operating on government contracts to gain control of patents derived from their work, thereby creating the opportunity for universities to earn large rents from patents and for researchers to form their own companies, all relying on knowledge and expertise obtained on government contracts.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 80</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;when the development of digital technologies and the Internet threatened the business model of the entertainment industry, the response was to pass laws to contain these technologies to preserve the sector’s mode of doing business. This is a great example of how it is not technology itself that is determining the distribution of income, but rather how various interest groups are able to write the laws governing the use of technology.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 121</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;In effect, creative workers would be given the option of relying on one or the other system of support. They could choose to rely on copyrights to support their work or they could opt to join the tax-credit system, but they could not do both.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 123</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;credit of $100 opted for by 90 percent of the adult population (a high percentage, but this is free money) would generate more than $22 billion a year to support books, movies, music, and other creative work. This amount would vastly exceed the amount currently going to creative workers through the copyright system, although it would total far less than the current subsidy for charitable contributions, which is likely in the neighborhood of at least $54 billion in 2016.[73]&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 124</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The goal of the creative work tax credit is to make a large amount of material available to the public that can be transferred at zero cost. Putting more material in the public domain in different areas is a positive benefit, as long as people value this work. The ultimate check on the boundaries of the system is what people are prepared to support with their tax credits. If few people opted to support journalism or video games, then these industries would remain largely dependent on copyright protection.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 125</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;There are good reasons for believing that an alternative would be at least as effective, especially in the case of patents. The prospect of having fully open research, where the incentive is for dissemination rather than secrecy, would almost certainly lead to more rapid progress than the current patent system.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 127</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;More importantly, bringing prices in line with production costs would offer enormous gains, especially in the case of drugs and medical equipment. It is difficult to understand the logic of paying for innovation at the point where a patient needs a drug or access to medical equipment. Monopoly pricing imposes an enormous burden on people at precisely the time when they are least able to bear it.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 128</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Weakening or eliminating patent and copyright support for innovation and creative work would radically reduce waste. In a market system, the best way to make profits should be to produce better products, not to run to court. But the patent system increasingly supports this second path to profits.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 128</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Stockholders are a diffuse group of individuals and institutions, most with little direct stake in the running of the company since the dividends and capital gains are a small portion of their income. Organizing among shareholders to improve corporate practices and to change top management has high transaction costs, and so it is far easier for shareholders to simply sell the stock of a company if they are unhappy with its performance. In this environment, top management will often have effective control over the running of a company.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 135</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;One of the champions in this area was Erskine Bowles, who served as Chief of Staff to President Clinton in his second term and later went on to be president of the University of North Carolina. While serving in this latter position, Bowles simultaneously sat on the boards of General Motors, Morgan Stanley, and Cousins Properties. The first two companies needed bailouts from the government to stay in business, but sitting on the board of two companies that faced bankruptcy did not damage the demand for Bowles as a director. After General Motors’ bankruptcy cost Bowles his directorship there, he added directorships at Norfolk Southern and Facebook to his portfolio.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 135</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Quigley, Crossland, and Campbell (2016) looked at the impact of unexpected CEO deaths, like from an airplane or car crash, on stock prices. The reason for focusing on unexpected deaths is that it takes away the possibility that the death may have been anticipated and its impact already reflected in the stock price, as might be the case when a CEO dies after a long illness. In almost half of the cases examined since 1990 (44.3 percent), the price of the company’s stock rose following the death of the CEO. If incumbent CEOs are uniquely talented individuals who cannot be easily replaced, then their loss should be unambiguously bad news for the company’s shareholders. In fact, the market might be expected to overreact on the negative side to the unexpected death of a CEO, since there might be the expectation that the CEO actually was a major asset to the company even in cases where it is not true. After all, why else would they be paying them so much money?&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 139</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;It is worth noting that pay at poorly governed companies will inevitably affect the pay at well-governed companies. While it is not common for CEOs to jump companies, having overpaid CEOs at poorly governed companies in the reference group for determining CEO pay will tend to increase the pay for CEOs at even the best-run companies. If the norm is for CEOs at large companies to be paid between $10 million and $20 million a year, a well-managed company will have a tough time retaining top-quality executives for $3 million to $4 million a year, even if that pay package were more appropriate given the marginal contribution of the CEO to profitability.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 142</div></div><p>In other words , everyone has to play along.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;In fairness, many university presidents are paid largely for their ability to attract donations, and it is possible that these presidents were especially successful in attracting contributions. However, this is a skill that matters much more in an unequal society that depends on donations from the rich to support higher education. Being able to develop relationships with the wealthy is a much less valuable skill in a society where the wealthy have less money and education is supported through other channels.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 146</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;However, should these highly visible athletic teams be getting special tax treatment as a result of their ties to the university? There is a solid argument for public subsidies for higher education, but the argument for subsidizing Ohio State’s football team is less clear cut.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 151</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The argument for the nonprofit sector is that these institutions are paying their top executives with public funds since they benefit from large tax subsidies. Just as the government puts all sorts of other restrictions on the activities of organizations receiving tax-exempt status, it can also make caps on pay a condition. Foundations and universities would still be free to pay their top executives whatever they wanted, but they wouldn’t be able to receive a subsidy if they violated the pay ceiling.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 152</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;This chapter argues that the barriers to competition and high pay exist because the professionals who benefit have far more political power than ordinary workers. No economic rule states that doctors, dentists, lawyers, and other professionals at the top of the pay ladder should be protected from the wage-depressing effects of globalization.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 154</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Excessive pay for doctors and other high-end professionals, a group that makes up a large share of the top 1 percent of the wage distribution, should be thought of as a tax. The rest of the country is paying more than necessary for health care and a variety of other services. Freeing up markets for highly paid professionals can both reduce inequality and lead to more rapid economic growth.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 155</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Limiting the number of U.S. medical school positions and the number of residency positions, together with requiring a U.S. residency for licensure, are explicit efforts to limit the supply of doctors. At the same time, limiting the extent to which less highly paid medical professionals like nurse practitioners and nurse midwives are allowed to engage in tasks such as prescribing medicine or delivering babies increases the demand for physicians’ services. While there can be legitimate safety concerns associated with restrictions on the scope of practice of less highly trained professionals, the economic implications are straightforward: higher pay for doctors and higher health care costs for patients.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 159</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;While the relatively large number of lawyers in the United States is a drain on the economy, factors unique to the United States might explain the higher ratio. Specifically, the rate of incarceration in the United States is far higher than in other wealthy countries, and so the demand for prosecutors and criminal defense lawyers is higher. In addition, the fact that the United States does not provide universal health insurance and has extraordinarily high health care costs means that people would have incentives that do not exist in other countries to pursue legal actions over physical injuries. Finally, regulation and litigation are alternative forms of protection. In countries with more extensive regulation for consumer protection and safety, there may be less need for legal action.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 163</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;According to the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, the average health care expenses of a person over 65 are 260 percent of the overall average (CMS 2010).[98]&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 177</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;According to the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, the average health care expenses of a person over 65 are 260 percent of the overall average (CMS 2010).[98] As a result, in 2010 the over-65 population accounted for almost 34 percent of total spending even though they were just 13.0 percent of the population.[99] And this share is projected to rise rapidly over the next two decades, reaching 20.7 percent by 2035. Assuming no change in the distribution of health care costs by age implies that the over-65 population will account for more than 47 percent of health care spending in 2035 (Table 7-7).&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 177</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;How many retirees might opt to emigrate? As noted earlier, about 1.5 percent of Social Security beneficiaries already live in other countries, and it is reasonable to believe that this number will increase as incentives are implemented, as the percentage of the foreign born among the retired rises, as the quality of health care abroad increases, and as growing communities of retirees in places like Ireland and Mexico inspire more people to relocate.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 181</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Doctors, dentists, and lawyers don’t face the same downward pressure on their wages as textile workers, autoworkers, and retail clerks because the government’s policies are not trying to push their pay lower. We aren’t designing trade agreements to expose these professions to competition with lower-paid counterparts in the developing world. Nor are politicians constantly looking for new ways to alter regulations in ways that undermine these workers’ bargaining power. The workers in these professions sit near the top of the pay ladder not because of the inherent dynamics of globalization and the market economy, but because they have much more say than other workers in setting the rules.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 189</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;There will always be genuine quality concerns in making these decisions, but if the assessment of quality issues is left to the professionals who stand to benefit, we can expect that these professionals will be enriching themselves at the expense of the rest of us.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 190</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Progressives have long been suspicious of the market. Some see it as an aberration to be contained, if not actually overcome. In the extreme case, the goal is some form of central planning in which the government makes the bulk of decisions on allocating resources. More tempered versions have the government taking possession of key industries, with smaller firms and less-consequential sectors left in private hands.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 191</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Both visions largely accept the view of the market held by Friedman-esque conservatives — that it is a fact of nature. Undesirable outcomes such as poverty or extreme inequality are givens, and the issue is the extent to which we want the government to supplant the market or ameliorate its effects. Markets are not fixed by nature; rather, they are infinitely malleable.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 191</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The enormous upward redistribution in the United States of the last four decades was not an inevitable outcome of technology or globalization. It was the result of deliberate policies, the purpose of which was to redistribute income upward.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 192</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;If pension and health care benefits are no longer a per-worker cost, then employers have less incentive to force workers to put in longer hours rather than just hiring more workers.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 200</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Most other wealthy countries guarantee workers four to six weeks a year of paid vacation (Ray, Sanes, and Schmitt 2013), but the United States inadvertently put in place a structure of benefits that pushes workers toward taking the gains from higher productivity in the form of higher income rather than time off. There is nothing natural about this, and evidence suggests that many workers would value more leisure time even at the cost of income or less rapid income growth in the future.[107] But beyond these reasons, reducing average work hours spreads good jobs around more broadly and tightens up the labor market, improving workers’ bargaining positions.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 200</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;For this reason, it is important to have policies that directly attack the source of high-end rents. Reducing the purchasing power of those at the top leaves more room for expanding the purchasing power of everyone else, without adding to inflation pressures.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 201</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;It is unambiguously the case that the rest of the country comes ahead by having less of its savings effectively taxed away by the financial industry.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 202</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Companies would be allowed to issue a number of shares that is roughly proportionate to the percentage of the corporate income that it expected to pay. This policy could be enacted by states that have corporate income taxes. If states followed this practice, they would likely both be reducing their own enforcement costs and setting a model that could be copied elsewhere.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 204</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;These industries, as currently structured, depend on an incredibly inefficient system of government-imposed monopolies. These monopolies make items that would otherwise be cheap, like prescription drugs and medical equipment, incredibly expensive. They also make it expensive to get recorded music, movies, and software — all items which could otherwise be transferred at zero cost. The&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 205</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Even the major pharmaceutical companies could still profit through a system of publicly funded research, since they would likely be the major recipients of contracts. However, as long as these companies can make large profits under the current system, they will be uninterested in a new route, regardless of the costs their system imposes on the country and the world.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 207</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Suppose a city of 200,000 made available a credit of $50 per adult. To be eligible for the credit, a creative worker would not only have to forego copyright protection for a period of time, but he or she would also have to physically live in the city for at least eight or nine months of the year. Donations by three quarters of the population (a high share, but it’s free, since the donor gets a full tax credit) would create a pool of $7.5 million to support creative workers. Since these workers would be required to live in the city much of the year, they would have an incentive to perform their music or plays, conduct writing workshops, or perform other work that would both support them and increase their visibility to people deciding what to do with their tax credit. It is easy to envision a scenario in which this sort of influx brings in enough tourist revenue to more than cover the cost of the tax credit.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 208</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;is not uncommon for their pay to cross $1 million, or more than 25 times the pay of the typical worker. As was noted in the chapter, this pay is largely subsidized by taxpayer dollars, since donations to these institutions are tax-exempt. This means that roughly 40 percent of their salaries came from taxpayers. In the case of a foundation or university president getting $1 million a year, effectively $400,000 is coming from taxpayers.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 210</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;If taxpayers are paying the bill, it is reasonable to put limits on the top salaries that these institutions can pay. The President of the United States is paid $400,000 a year, which seems like a fair limit on the pay of people employed by tax-exempt institutions. Just to be clear, this is not limiting what nonprofit institutions can pay their presidents or other top officials. It is only limiting what they can pay them while getting a subsidy from taxpayers.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 210</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The fruit of lower pay for those at the top is lower tuition costs and more money available for other employees.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 211</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;if the market is rigged to redistribute ever more income upward, it will be difficult to design tax and transfer policies to reverse this effect. And if the rigging efforts are never challenged, then they will impose an ever greater burden on those trying to reduce inequality through tax and transfer policy.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 214</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;there should be little doubt that there is potential to have a large impact on the distribution of income through economically plausible restructurings of the market. The gainers in the top 1 percent have structured the market over the last four decades in ways that increase their share of income. This restructuring can be reversed.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 216</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Government policy shapes market outcomes. It determines aggregate levels of output and employment, which in turn affect the bargaining power of different groups of workers. Government policy structures financial markets, and the policy giving the industry special protections allows for some individuals to get enormously rich. Government policy determines the extent to which individuals can claim ownership of technology and how much they can profit from it. Government policy sets up corporate governance structures that let top management enrich itself at the expense of shareholders. And government policy determines whether highly paid professionals enjoy special protection from foreign and domestic competition.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 217</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Pretending that the distribution of income and wealth that results from a long set of policy decisions is somehow the natural workings of the market is not a serious position. It might be politically convenient for conservatives who want to lock inequality in place.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 218</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;It is a more politically compelling position to argue that we should not interfere with market outcomes than to argue for a system that is deliberately structured to make some people very rich while leaving others in poverty.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 218</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Pretending that distributional outcomes are just the workings of the market is convenient for any beneficiaries of this inequality, even those who consider themselves liberal. They can feel entitled to their prosperity by virtue of being winners in the market, yet sufficiently benevolent to share some of their wealth with the less fortunate. For this reason, they may also find it useful to pretend that we have a set of market outcomes not determined by policy decisions.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 218</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;But we should not structure our understanding of the economy around political convenience.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 218</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;As a technical matter, the Federal Reserve Bank of New York is a private bank. It is owned by the banks that are members of the Federal Reserve System in the New York District.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 3760-3761</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Individual income tax filings is another area that provides a considerable amount of often unnecessary work for lawyers. It should be possible for the IRS to calculate the returns of most low- and moderate-income workers and send the completed forms back to the taxpayer for approval. This is the practice in several European countries. Adopting this approach would radically reduce the need for tax consultants and for lawyers to challenge the work of these consultants.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 3980-3983</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Developing countries face the risk of a brain drain if a large portion of the professionals emigrate to the United States or other wealthy countries. This could be countered by refunding a portion of the gains, for example, the income tax on the earnings of immigrant doctors, to the home country. Such a rule would allow for the training of several professionals for every one that comes to the United States.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 3998-4001</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;There is also reason to believe that taking the benefits of productivity growth in leisure rather than income will have environmental benefits (Rosnick&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 4031-4032</div></div>      </div>
      </div>
        <div class="footer">
    <div class="footer-data"><div class="footer-links"><ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/contact.php" title="">Contact</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/support.php" title="">Support</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/privacy.php" title="">Privacy</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/rights.php" title="">Rights</a></li></ul></div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="copyright">Copyright (c) 1999-2026 earthli.com. All Rights Reserved.</div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="versions">Powered by <ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore/app_news.php">earthli News 3.7</a></li><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore" title="">earthli WebCore&trade; 3.7</a></li></ul></div></div>    </div>
      </div>
  </div>  </body>
</html>
]]>
  </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
      <title type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[A Man Called Ove by Fredrik Backman (2012/en-2014) (read in 2017)]]>
  </title>
    <id>https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3399</id>
    <link href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3399"/>
    <updated>2017-04-02T17:41:45+02:00</updated>
    <author>
        <name type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[Marco von Ballmoos]]>
  </name>
      <uri>https://earthli.com/users/marco</uri>
    </author>
      <summary type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<blockquote class="quote abstract "><div>Disclaimer: these are notes I took while reading this book. They include citations I found interesting or enlightening or particularly well-written. In some cases, I&rsquo;ve pointed out which of these applies to which citation; in others, I have not. Any benefit you gain from reading these notes is... [<a class="complete-text-link" href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3399">More</a>]</div></blockquote>]]>
  </summary>
      <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<html lang="en">
  <head>
    <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/themes/ice.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/fonts/raleway.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/core/medium.css">
  </head>
  <body>
<div class="style-controls">  <div class="page">
    <div class="page-body">
<div class="info-box-top">
<p>
Published by <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_user.php?name=marco" title="Marco von Ballmoos" class="visible">marco</a> on <span class="date-time">2. Apr 2017 17:41:45 (GMT-5)</span>
</p>
<p>
Updated by <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_user.php?name=marco" title="Marco von Ballmoos" class="visible">marco</a> on <span class="date-time">21. Aug 2017 21:15:23 (GMT-5)</span>
</p>
</div>
      <div class="text-flow wide">
  <blockquote class="quote abstract "><div>Disclaimer: these are notes I took while reading this book. They include citations I found interesting or enlightening or particularly well-written. In some cases, I&rsquo;ve pointed out which of these applies to which citation; in others, I have not. Any benefit you gain from reading these notes is purely incidental to the purpose they serve of reminding me what I once read. Please see Wikipedia for a summary if I&rsquo;ve failed to provide one sufficient for your purposes. If my notes serve to trigger an interest in this book, then I&rsquo;m happy for you.</div></blockquote><p>This is the story of Ove, a man living in a town on the outskirts of a city in Sweden. Ove likes things predictable and can&rsquo;t see why anyone would want it any other way. Other people are distractions and annoyances and constantly disappointing. The story is told in the third person, but from the viewpoint of a 59-year–old Ove. Some of the chapters are flashbacks to help readers understand <em>why</em> Ove is the way he is, how it&rsquo;s possible for him to be at once cantankerous beyond all imagining and also a generous person.</p>
<p>His life arc starts with a mother who dies too soon and being raised until 16 by a father he honors and worships, until his father, too, is taken away by the grim reaper. Ove takes over his father&rsquo;s job and his lifestyle, simple and direct, working hard and sticking to rigid principle. Most appreciate him for his work and attitude and forthrightness but there are opponents, one of whom, Tom, eventually leads him to lose his job. He learns construction during the day while cleaning trains at night. He meets Sonja, from then on his only reason for waking and drawing breath. She is likewise—and for all of her friends, mysteriously—enchanted. Though he doesn&rsquo;t say much, he listens well—and he is bulky with workman&rsquo;s muscle to compensate for his taciturnity.</p>
<p>They make a life together, moving in to the district where Ove lives in the present, with life dealing them one raw deal after another. They go to Spain on holiday, where a pregnant Sonja takes siestas with gusto while Ove wanders the countryside, making himself useful with his skills despite an almost complete language barrier. On the way home, the bus crashes, taking their unborn child as well as Sonja&rsquo;s ability to walk. Nevertheless, they weather these tragedies well enough, settling into a happy and comfortable routine. The world begins to outpace Ove, with his dedication to fine craftsmanship in homes and cars seeing less and less value in the real world, a world filled with distracted idiots, flitting between ephemeral obsessions. This includes his new neighbors with whom he has entirely too much to do—the Pregnant Foreign Woman and the Lanky Fool with their two children. Throw into the mix a Bent and unwanted Housemate, a Mailman who doesn&rsquo;t understand propriety or boundaries and a cat who seems to embody Sonja&rsquo;s now-passed–on conscience.</p>
<p>Ove wants nothing more than to join Sonja wherever she&rsquo;s ended up after succumbing to cancer but his neighbors manage to distract him from several attempts at ending it all, always in the nick of time. Ove grudgingly finds himself useful again, even loved. He teaches Parvaneh to drive, he helps Anders fix a bike and buy a car, he teaches a bigoted father to stop being a jackass and to be happy he has a son at all. He continues to be the man that Sonja always knew him to be. Until, eventually, and after a few years of a second life, he finally joins her.</p>
<h2>Citations</h2><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;She had a golden brooch pinned to her dress, in which the sunlight reflected hypnotically through the train window. […] Ove had just clocked off his shift and was actually supposed to be taking the train the other way. But then he saw her on the platform with all her rich auburn hair and her blue eyes and all her effervescent laughter. And he got back on the outbound train. Of course, he didn&rsquo;t quite know himself why he was doing it. He had never been spontaneous before in his life. But when he saw her it was as if something malfunctioned.</p>
<p>&ldquo;[…]</p>
<p>&ldquo;He didn&rsquo;t know what he was going to say. But he had hardly had time to sink into the seat before she turned to him cheerfully, smiled warmly , and said hello. And he found he was able to say hello back to her without any significant complications.&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 128</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;Chastened by recent experiences, he did not take the Saab, but walked instead to the station. Because this time neither Pregnant Foreign Woman, Blond Weed, Rune&rsquo;s wife,<br>
 nor low-quality rope would be given an opportunity of ruining Ove&rsquo;s morning He&rsquo;d bled these people&rsquo;s radiators, loaned them his things, given them lifts to the hospital. But now he was finally on his way.&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 140</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;He checked the timetable once more. He hated being late. It ruined the planning. Made everything out of step. His wife had been utterly useless at it, keeping to plans. But it was always like that with women. They couldn&rsquo;t stick to a plan even if you glued them to it, Ove had learned. When he was driving somewhere he drew up schedules and plans and decided where they&rsquo;d fill up and when they&rsquo;d stop for coffee, all in the interest of making the trip as time-efficient as possible. He studied maps and estimated exactly how long each leg of the journey would take and how they should avoid rush-hour traffic and the shortcuts to take that people with GPS systems wouldn&rsquo;t be able to make head nor tail of. Ove always had a clear travel strategy. His wife, on the other hand, always came up with insanities like &ldquo;going by a sense of feel&rdquo; and &ldquo;taking it easy.&rdquo; As if that was a way for an adult person to get anywhere in life. […] And when Ove got disgruntled she always had to challenge the importance of having a time plan when driving somewhere. &ldquo;We&rsquo;re not in a hurry anyway,&rdquo; she&rsquo;d say. As if <em>that</em> had anything to do with it.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 140</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;Ove doesn&rsquo;t answer. He walks past the man behind the Plexiglas, back out into the snow-covered streets, and starts walking home.</p>
<p>&ldquo;The town slowly wakes up around him with its foreign-made cars and its statistics and credit-card debt and all its other crap.</p>
<p>&ldquo;And so this day was also ruined, he confirms with bitterness.&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 146</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;As for Ove, he felt he was at a job interview, and he had never been very good at that sort of thing. So when Sonja wasn&rsquo;t talking, which admittedly she did almost all of the time, there was a sort of silence in the room that can only arise between a man who does not want to lose his daughter and a man who has not yet completely understood that he has been chosen to take her away from there.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 153–154</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;He hears voices from the living room. He can hardly believe his ears. Considering how they are constantly preventing him from dying, these neighbors of his are certainly not shy when it comes to driving a man to the brink of madness and suicide. That&rsquo;s for sure.</p>
<p>&ldquo;When Ove comes back down the stairs with the blanket in his hand, the overweight young man from next door is standing in the middle of his living room, looking with curiosity at the cat and Parvaneh.</p>
<p>&ldquo;[…]</p>
<p>&ldquo;&ldquo;Okay,&rdquo; says Ove, silently appalled that you can pop upstairs for a moment only to find when you come back down that you&rsquo;ve apparently started a bed-and-breakfast operation.&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 160</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;But Sonja loved Ernest so unconditionally that Ove managed to keep this kind of perfectly sensible observation to himself. He knew better than to speak ill of what she loved; after all he understood very keenly how it was to receive her love when no one else could understand why he was worthy of it.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 167</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Ove looks at the group assembled around him, as if he&rsquo;s been kidnapped and taken to a parallel universe. For a moment he thinks about swerving off the road, until he realizes that the worst-case scenario would be that they all accompanied him into the afterlife. After this insight, he reduces his speed and increases the gap significantly between his own car and the one in front.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 208</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;He&rsquo;s silent. And then they both stand there, the fifty-nine-year-old and the teenager, a few yards apart, kicking at the snow.  As if they were kicking a memory back and forth,<br>
 a memory of a woman who insisted on seeing more potential in certain men than they saw in themselves. Neither of them knows what to do with the shared experience.&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 227</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Everyone seems to be thinking the same thing: If a non-throat-tattooed man of Ove&rsquo;s age without any hesitation steps up to a throat-tattooed man of the age of this Throat Tattoo and presses him up against a car in this manner, then it&rsquo;s very likely not the throat-tattooed man one should be worried about annoying.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 237</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;"Now, you listen to me,&ldquo; says Ove calmly while he carefully close the door. &ldquo;You&rsquo;ve given birth to two children and quite soon you&rsquo;ll be squeezing out a third. You&rsquo;ve come here from a land far away and most likely you fled war and persecution and all sorts of other nonsense. You&rsquo;ve learned a new language and got yourself an education and you&rsquo;re holding together a family of obvious incompetents. And I&rsquo;ll be damned if I&rsquo;ve seen you afraid of a single bloody thing in this world before now.&rdquo;</p>
<p>&ldquo;Ove rivets his eyes into her. Parvaneh is still agape. Ove points imperiously at the pedals under the feet.</p>
<p>&ldquo;&ldquo;I&rsquo;m not asking for brain surgery. I&rsquo;m asking you to drive a car. It&rsquo;s got an accelerator, a brake, and a clutch. Some of the greatest twits in world history have sorted out how it works. And you will as well.<br>
 <br>
&ldquo;Because you are not a complete twit.&rdquo;&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 237</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;And Ove didn&rsquo;t know exactly when he became so quiet. He&rsquo;d always been taciturn, but this was something quite different. Maybe he had started talking more inside his own head. Maybe he was going insane (he did wonder sometimes). It was as if he didn&rsquo;t want other people to talk to him, he was afraid that their chattering voices would drown out the memory of her voice.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 260</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;The man in the white shirt smiles in a superior manner. The way men in white shirts, who are used to always having things their own way, smile when someone tries to disagree with them.</p>
<p>&ldquo;&ldquo;Move it at once.&rdquo;</p>
<p>&ldquo;&ldquo;I don&rsquo;t think so,&rdquo; says Ove.</p>
<p>&ldquo;The man in the white shirt sighs, as if the threatening statement he makes after that were directed at a child.</p>
<p>&ldquo;&ldquo;Move the trailer, Ove. Or I&rsquo;ll call the police.&rdquo;</p>
<p>&ldquo;Ove shakes his head nonchalantly, pointing at the sign farther down the road.</p>
<p>&ldquo;&ldquo;Motor vehicles prohibited inside the residential area. It says so clearly on the sign.&rdquo;</p>
<p>&ldquo;&ldquo;Don&rsquo;t you have anything better to do than standing out here pretending to be the foreman?&rdquo; groans the man in the white shirt.</p>
<p>&ldquo;&ldquo;There was nothing good on TV,&rdquo; says Ove.</p>
<p>&ldquo;And that&rsquo;s when there&rsquo;s a little twitch at the temple of the man in the white shirt. As if his mask has slipped a little, just a fraction. He looks at the trailer, his boxed in Škoda, the sign, Ove standing in front of him with his arms crossed. […]</p>
<p>&ldquo;&ldquo;This was very silly of you, Ove. This was very, very silly,&rdquo; he hisses finally.&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 270</div></div><p>This part reminded me very much of <em>One Flew Over the Cuckoo&rsquo;s Nest</em>.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;It&rsquo;s as if all the energy in Ove&rsquo;s body is draining out of him even as he stands there.</p>
<p>&ldquo;Maybe it&rsquo;s the sight of Anita&rsquo;s worn-out face. Maybe it&rsquo;s the insight that a simple battle won is nothing in the greater scheme of things. A boxed-in Škoda makes no difference. They always come back.<br>
 Just like they did with Sonja. Like they always do. With their clauses and documents. Men in white shirts always win. And men like Ove always lose people like Sonja. And nothing can bring her back to him.&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 272</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;So this should have been the day Ove <em>finally</em> died. Instead it became the evening before the morning when he woke with not only a cat but also a bent person living in his row house. Sonja would have liked it, most likely. She liked hotels.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 281</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;And now Ove stands by Sonja&rsquo;s gravestone and manages to say something about how sorry he is.</p>
<p>&ldquo;&ldquo;You get so damned worked up when I fight with people, I know that. But the reality of it is this. You&rsquo;ll just have to wait a bit longer for me up there. I don&rsquo;t have time to die right now.&rdquo;</p>
<p>&ldquo;Then he digs up the old, frozen pink flowers out of the ground, plants the new ones, straightens up,<br>
 folds up his deck chair, and walks towards the parking area while muttering something that sounds suspiciously like &ldquo;because there&rsquo;s a bloody war on.&rdquo;&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 297</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;There wasn&rsquo;t much wrong with the meal last night, he can stretch to admitting that. Although Ove doesn&rsquo;t feel there&rsquo;s a need to make such a palaver about cooking, as Parvaneh does. Meat and potatoes and gravy are perfectly adequate. But if one has to complicate things like she does, Ove could possible agree that her rice with saffron is reasonably edible. It is. So he had two portions of it. And the cat had one and a half.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 307</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;In the meantime Jimmy, Mirsad, and Patrick have managed to squeeze into Adrian&rsquo;s new car in front of them. A Toyota. Hardly and optimal choice of car for any kind of thinking person, Ove had pointed out to him many times while they stood there at the dealership. But at least it wasn&rsquo;t French. And Ove managed to get the price reduced by almost eight thousand kronor and made sure that the kid got winter tires thrown in for the same price. So it seemed acceptable, in spite of it all.</p>
<p>&ldquo;When Ove got to the dealership the bloody kid had been checking out a Hyundai. So it could have been worse.&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 314</div></div>      </div>
      </div>
        <div class="footer">
    <div class="footer-data"><div class="footer-links"><ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/contact.php" title="">Contact</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/support.php" title="">Support</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/privacy.php" title="">Privacy</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/rights.php" title="">Rights</a></li></ul></div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="copyright">Copyright (c) 1999-2026 earthli.com. All Rights Reserved.</div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="versions">Powered by <ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore/app_news.php">earthli News 3.7</a></li><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore" title="">earthli WebCore&trade; 3.7</a></li></ul></div></div>    </div>
      </div>
  </div>  </body>
</html>
]]>
  </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
      <title type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[Notes from Underground by Fyodor Dostoyevsky (1850) (read in 2017)]]>
  </title>
    <id>https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3371</id>
    <link href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3371"/>
    <updated>2017-02-06T23:30:47+01:00</updated>
    <author>
        <name type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[Marco von Ballmoos]]>
  </name>
      <uri>https://earthli.com/users/marco</uri>
    </author>
      <summary type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<blockquote class="quote abstract "><div>Disclaimer: these are notes I took while reading this book. They include citations I found interesting or enlightening or particularly well-written. In some cases, I&rsquo;ve pointed out which of these applies to which citation; in others, I have not. Any benefit you gain from reading these notes is... [<a class="complete-text-link" href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3371">More</a>]</div></blockquote>]]>
  </summary>
      <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<html lang="en">
  <head>
    <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/themes/ice.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/fonts/raleway.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/core/medium.css">
  </head>
  <body>
<div class="style-controls">  <div class="page">
    <div class="page-body">
<div class="info-box-top">
<p>
Published by <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_user.php?name=marco" title="Marco von Ballmoos" class="visible">marco</a> on <span class="date-time">6. Feb 2017 23:30:47 (GMT-5)</span>
</p>
</div>
      <div class="text-flow wide">
  <blockquote class="quote abstract "><div>Disclaimer: these are notes I took while reading this book. They include citations I found interesting or enlightening or particularly well-written. In some cases, I&rsquo;ve pointed out which of these applies to which citation; in others, I have not. Any benefit you gain from reading these notes is purely incidental to the purpose they serve of reminding me what I once read. Please see Wikipedia for a summary if I&rsquo;ve failed to provide one sufficient for your purposes. If my notes serve to trigger an interest in this book, then I&rsquo;m happy for you.</div></blockquote><p>This is a short book, split into two main parts. The first part is a cry of anger at society, spit out at the world from &ldquo;underground&rdquo; by the narrator. It is delivered in a nearly stream-of-consciousness form and opines on all sorts of social and philosophical issues—often winding back on itself to second-guess or to revise. The attached notes give abundant examples.</p>
<p>The second part is told by the same author, but in a more refined tone. It seems to describe an incident of mortifying self-awareness and banal evil that seems to have been the trigger for the previous narrator&rsquo;s (same person, but 20 years later) having turned his back on society. The young man was exceedingly poor and exceedingly proud and took out his frustrations on an even poorer and more unfortunate young woman, destroying her feelings. All the while, he was completely aware of what it cost her and what it would cost him, but his brutal honesty in his internal—and, often, external—dialogue, didn&rsquo;t allow him to stop himself.</p>
<h2>Citations</h2><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;But if you saw how proud is that mighty spirit who created this colossal setting and how proudly convinced this spirit is of its victory and of its triumph, then you would shudder for its pride, obstinacy, and blindness, but you would shudder also for those over whom this proud spirit hovers and reigns.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 98-100</div></div><p>I am more likely to reject religion than to try to reconcile it as intrinsic to the human condition.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;This mighty spirit is the spirit of industrial capitalism, and the crystal palace is its temple.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 101-101</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The two time periods of the novel represent two stages in the evolution of the Russian intelligentsia: the sentimental, literary 1840s and the rational and utilitarian 1860s; the time of the liberals and the time of the nihilists.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 103-105</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Indeed, there could hardly be a more thorough denial of artistic unity than this last quoted passage. The naive blitheness of its expression is characteristic of Chernyshevsky and thinkers like him (utilitarians, nihilists; then Lenin, Lunacharsky, the theorists of “socialist realism”).&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 156-158</div></div><p>That&rsquo;s what Peterson is.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;before we celebrate that at least eere not doing THAT think hoe much misery our own system produces killng souls rather than bodies&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 163</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Giftlessness, as Dostoevsky feared and Nabokov knew, became the dominant style in Russia; it eventually seized power, and in the process of “making people happy” destroyed them by millions, leaving its vast motherland broken and desolate.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 161-163</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;In this respect the greatest foresight was shown by long-eared Shigalyov, the radical theoretician in Dostoevsky’s Demons: “I got entangled in my own data, and my conclusion directly contradicts the original idea I start from. Starting from unlimited freedom, I conclude with unlimited despotism. I will add, however, that apart from my solution to the social formula, there is no other.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 168-171</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;He recognized that his opposition to the “Chernyshevskians” could not be a struggle for domination, that what was in question was the complex reality of the human being, the whole person, the “thing itself,” and that a true articulation of that reality could only come as the final “gift” of an artistic image.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 173-175</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;1840s and 1850s: Slavophile versus Westernizer debate among Russian intellectuals. Westernizers advocate progress by assimilating Western rationalism and civic freedom. Slavophiles assert spiritual superiority of Russia to the West and argue that future development should be based upon the traditions of the Orthodox Church and the peasant commune or mir.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 314-317</div></div><p>Fuck you. are we seriously still fighting the exact same ideological battle 200 years later?</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;swear to you, gentlemen. that to be overly conscious is a sickness, a real, thorough sickness. For man’s everyday use, ordinary human consciousness would be more than enough; that is, a half, a quarter of the portion that falls to the lot of a developed man in our unfortunate nineteenth century,&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 4</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;not believe itself, slip back shamefacedly into its crack. There, in its loathsome, stinking underground, our offended, beaten-down, and derided mouse at once immerses itself in cold, venomous, and, above all, everlasting spite. For forty years on end it will recall its offense to the last, most shameful details, each time adding even more shameful details of its own, spitefully taunting and chafing itself with its fantasies. It will be ashamed of its fantasies, but all the same it will recall everything, go over everything, heap all sorts of figments on itself, under the pretext that they, too, could have happened, and forgive nothing.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 8</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;“For pity’s sake,” they’ll shout at you, “you can’t rebel: it’s two times two is four! Nature doesn’t ask your permission; it doesn’t care about your wishes, or whether you like its laws or not. You’re obliged to accept it as it is, and consequently all its results as well. And so a wall is indeed a wall … etc., etc.” My God, but what do I care about the laws of nature and arithmetic if for some reason these laws and two times two is four are not to my liking?&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 10</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Formerly, he saw justice in bloodshed and with a quiet conscience exterminated whoever he had to; while now, though we do regard bloodshed as vile, we still occupy ourselves with this vileness, and even more than formerly. Which is worse? – decide for yourselves.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 19</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;that now, too, though man has learned to see more clearly on occasion than in barbarous times, he is still far from having grown accustomed to acting as reason and science dictate. But even so you are perfectly confident that he will not fail to grow accustomed once one or two old bad habits have passed and once common sense and science have thoroughly re-educated and given a normal direction to human nature.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 19</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;And it is then – this is still you speaking – that new economic relations will come, quite ready-made, and also calculated with mathematical precision, so that all possible questions will vanish in an instant, essentially because they will have been given all possible answers. Then the crystal palace will get built.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 20</div></div><p>This reminds me of <em>V</em> by <em>Yevgeny Zamyatin</em>.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;And all this for the emptiest of reasons, which would seem not even worth mentioning: namely, that man, whoever he might be, has always and everywhere liked to act as he wants, and not at all as reason and profit dictate; and one can want even against one’s own profit, and one sometimes even positively must (this is my idea now).&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 21</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;“Hm …” you decide, “our wantings are for the most part mistaken owing to a mistaken view of our profit. We sometimes want pure rubbish precisely because, in our stupidity, we see this rubbish as the easiest path to the attainment of some preconceived profit. Well, but when it’s all explained, worked out on a piece of paper (which is quite possible because, after all, it’s vile and senseless to believe beforehand that there are certain laws of nature which man will never learn) – then, to be sure, there will be no more so-called desires. For if wanting someday gets completely in cahoots with reason, then essentially we shall be reasoning and not wanting, because it really is impossible, for example, while preserving reason, to want senselessness and thus knowingly go against reason and wish yourself harm … And since all wantings and reasonings can indeed be calculated – because, after all, they will someday discover the laws of our so-called free will – then consequently, and joking aside, something like a little table can be arranged, so that we shall indeed want according to this little table.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 22</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;But I repeat to you for the hundredth time, there is only one case, one only, when man may purposely, consciously wish for himself even the harmful, the stupid, even what is stupidest of all: namely, so as to have the right to wish for himself even what is stupidest of all and not be bound by an obligation to wish for himself only what is intelligent. For this stupidest of all, this caprice of ours, gentlemen, may in fact be the most profitable of anything on earth for our sort, especially in certain cases. And in particular it may be more profitable than all other profits even in the case when it is obviously harmful and contradicts the most sensible conclusions of our reason concerning profits – because in any event it preserves for us the chiefest and dearest thing, that is, our personality and our individuality.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 23</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Now I ask you: what can be expected of man as a being endowed with such strange qualities? Shower him with all earthly blessings, drown him in happiness completely, over his head, so that only bubbles pop up on the surface of happiness, as on water; give him such economic satisfaction that he no longer has anything left to do at all except sleep, eat gingerbread, and worry about the noncessation of world history – and it is here, just here, that he, this man, out of sheer ingratitude, out of sheer lampoonery, will do something nasty. He will even risk his gingerbread, and wish on purpose for the most pernicious nonsense, the most noneconomical meaninglessness, solely in order to mix into all this positive good sense his own pernicious, fantastical element.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 25</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;But where is man to go? Something awkward, at any rate, can be noticed in him each time he achieves some such goal. Achieving he likes, but having achieved he does not quite like, and that, of course, is terribly funny.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 28</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Two times two is four has a cocky look; it stands across your path, arms akimbo, and spits. I agree that two times two is four is an excellent thing; but if we’re going to start praising everything, then two times two is five is sometimes also a most charming little thing.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 28</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Now look: if instead of a palace there is a chicken coop, and it starts to rain, I will perhaps get into the chicken coop to avoid a wetting, but all the same I will not take the chicken coop for a palace out of gratitude for its having kept me from the rain. You laugh, you even say that in that case it makes no difference – chicken coop or mansion. Yes, say I, if one were to live only so as not to get wet.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 29</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;once saw a girl there, alone, by the door, on New Year’s day. Her own people had kicked her out for the fun of it, to cool her off a bit, because she was howling too much, and locked the door behind her. At nine o’clock in the morning she was already completely drunk, disheveled, half-naked, all beaten up. Her face was powdered white, and her eyes were black-and-blue; blood was flowing from her nose and teeth. some coachman had just given her a pasting. She sat down on the stone stairs, holding some kind of salted fish; she was howling and wailing something about her ‘miserble lot,’ beating her fish against the steps. And coachmen and drunken soldiers crowded around the steps, teasing her.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 89</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Our silence had already lasted some five minutes. The tea sat on the table; we didn’t touch it: it went so far that I purposely refused to begin drinking, so as to make it still harder for her; and it would have been awkward for her to begin. Several times she glanced at me in sad perplexity. I was stubbornly silent. The chief martyr, of course, was myself, because I was fully conscious of all the loathsome baseness of my spiteful stupidity, and at the same time I simply could not restrain myself.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 106</div></div><p>Such utterly manufactured and nonetheless uncomfortable tension.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;“Why did you come? Answer! Answer!” I kept exclaiming, all but beside myself. “I’ll tell you why you came, my dear. You came because of the pathetic words I used with you then. So you went all soft, and you wanted more ‘pathetic words.’ Know, then, know that I was laughing at you that time. And I’m laughing now. Why do you tremble? Yes, laughing! I’d been insulted earlier, at dinner, by the ones who came there ahead of me. I came there to give a thrashing to one of them, the officer; but I didn’t succeed, he wasn’t there; I needed to unload my offense on someone, to get my own back, and you turned up, so I poured out my spite and laughed at you. I’d been humiliated, so I, too, wanted to humiliate; they’d ground me down like a rag, so I, too, wanted to show my power … That’s what it was, and you thought I came then on purpose to save you, right? That’s what you thought? That’s what you thought?”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 107</div></div><p>So unbearably evil and at the same time honest. accepting that he himself is irredeemable. refusing even to try.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;And all the rest of the time she listened to me with open mouth, with wide open eyes, and trembling in terrible fear. The cynicism, the cynicism of my words crushed her …&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 107</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;But maybe I’m worse than you are. Why didn’t you fling it in my mug when I started reading you my oration: ‘And you, what did you come here for? To teach us morals, or what?’ Power, power, that’s what I wanted then, the game was what I wanted, I wanted to achieve your tears, your humiliation, your hysterics – that’s what I wanted then! But I couldn’t stand it myself, because I’m trash, I got all scared and, like a fool, gave you my address, devil knows why. And afterwards, even before I got home, I was already cursing you up and down for that address. I already hated you, because I’d lied to you then. Because I only talk a good game,&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 107</div></div><p>Thoughts become words with him. no filter.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;But can you possibly not have realized even now that I will never forgive you for having found me in this wretched dressing gown, as I was hurling myself like a vicious little cur at Apollon? The resurrector, the former hero, flinging himself like a mangy, shaggy mutt at his lackey, who just laughs at him! And those tears a moment ago, which, like an ashamed woman, I couldn’t hold back before you, I will never forgive you! And what I’m confessing to you now, I will also never forgive you! Yes – you, you alone must answer for all this, because you turned up here, because I’m a scoundrel, because I’m the most vile, the most ridiculous, the most petty, the most stupid, the most envious of all worms on earth, who are in no way better than I, but who, devil knows why, are never embarrassed; while I will just go on being flicked all my life by every nit – that’s my trait!&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 108</div></div><p>A pitiless level of self-awareness.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;By tomorrow I’d have already dirtied her soul with myself and worn out her heart. But now the insult will never die in her, and however vile the dirt that awaits her – the insult will elevate and purify her … through hatred … hm … maybe also forgiveness … Though, by the way, will all that make it any easier for her?” And in fact I’m now asking an idle question of my own: which is better – cheap happiness, or lofty suffering? Well, which is better?&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 113</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;“Excuse me, gentlemen, but I am not justifying myself with this allishness. As far as I myself am concerned, I have merely carried to an extreme in my life what you have not dared to carry even halfway, and, what’s more, you’ve taken your cowardice for good sense, and found comfort in thus deceiving yourselves.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 115</div></div>      </div>
      </div>
        <div class="footer">
    <div class="footer-data"><div class="footer-links"><ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/contact.php" title="">Contact</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/support.php" title="">Support</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/privacy.php" title="">Privacy</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/rights.php" title="">Rights</a></li></ul></div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="copyright">Copyright (c) 1999-2026 earthli.com. All Rights Reserved.</div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="versions">Powered by <ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore/app_news.php">earthli News 3.7</a></li><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore" title="">earthli WebCore&trade; 3.7</a></li></ul></div></div>    </div>
      </div>
  </div>  </body>
</html>
]]>
  </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
      <title type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[The Big Short: Inside the Doomsday Machine by Michael Lewis (2010) (read in 2017)]]>
  </title>
    <id>https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3369</id>
    <link href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3369"/>
    <updated>2017-02-06T22:50:02+01:00</updated>
    <author>
        <name type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[Marco von Ballmoos]]>
  </name>
      <uri>https://earthli.com/users/marco</uri>
    </author>
      <summary type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<blockquote class="quote abstract "><div>Disclaimer: these are notes I took while reading this book. They include citations I found interesting or enlightening or particularly well-written. In some cases, I&rsquo;ve pointed out which of these applies to which citation; in others, I have not. Any benefit you gain from reading these notes is... [<a class="complete-text-link" href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3369">More</a>]</div></blockquote>]]>
  </summary>
      <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<html lang="en">
  <head>
    <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/themes/ice.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/fonts/raleway.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/core/medium.css">
  </head>
  <body>
<div class="style-controls">  <div class="page">
    <div class="page-body">
<div class="info-box-top">
<p>
Published by <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_user.php?name=marco" title="Marco von Ballmoos" class="visible">marco</a> on <span class="date-time">6. Feb 2017 22:50:02 (GMT-5)</span>
</p>
</div>
      <div class="text-flow wide">
  <blockquote class="quote abstract "><div>Disclaimer: these are notes I took while reading this book. They include citations I found interesting or enlightening or particularly well-written. In some cases, I&rsquo;ve pointed out which of these applies to which citation; in others, I have not. Any benefit you gain from reading these notes is purely incidental to the purpose they serve of reminding me what I once read. Please see Wikipedia for a summary if I&rsquo;ve failed to provide one sufficient for your purposes. If my notes serve to trigger an interest in this book, then I&rsquo;m happy for you.</div></blockquote><p>This is the book on which the <em><a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3325">movie</a></em> was based. My review in that link was extensive and I liked the book just as much. Lewis really did a good job outlining the players, explaining the financial instruments and their holders, inventors, connections, weaknesses and ramifications.</p>
<p>It&rsquo;s an extremely financially technical book and will prove a challenge for many to figure out what&rsquo;s really going on. Lewis emphasizes several times that most people in the industry didn&rsquo;t know how these things worked, but knew for approximately how long they would work, so they made money and unloaded them on unsuspecting saps before everything blew up. Others knew that the government would bail them out and just drove their companies into a wall, coming out smelling like roses anyway.</p>
<p>Lewis does a good job of highlighting both the criminality and the stupidity of so many in the industry—and also the hopelessness of any change coming out of the worldwide debacle.</p>
<h2>Citations</h2><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Over and over again, the financial system was, in some narrow way, discredited. Yet the big Wall Street banks at the center of it just kept on growing, along with the sums of money that they doled out to twenty-six-year-olds to perform tasks of no obvious social utility. The rebellion by American youth against the money culture never happened. Why bother to overturn your parents’ world when you can buy it and sell off the pieces? At some point, I gave up waiting. There was no scandal or reversal, I assumed, sufficiently great to sink the system.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 4</div></div><p>And you will have been right again. It&rsquo;s still unsinkable and bigger than ever.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Her message was clear: If you want to know what these Wall Street firms are really worth, take a cold, hard look at these crappy assets they’re holding with borrowed money, and imagine what they’d fetch in a fire sale.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 5</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;This woman wasn’t saying that Wall Street bankers were corrupt. She was saying that they were stupid. These people whose job it was to allocate capital apparently didn’t even know how to manage their own.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 7</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;By then there was a long and growing list of pundits who claimed they predicted the catastrophe, but a far shorter list of people who actually did.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 11</div></div><p>How does he not know the right tense to use here? It should be <span class="quote-inline">&ldquo;who actually [had]&rdquo;</span></p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Historically, a Wall Street firm worried over the creditworthiness of its customers; its customers often took it on faith that the casino would be able to pay off its winners. Mike Burry lacked faith. “I’m not making a bet against a bond,” he said. “I’m making a bet against a system.” He didn’t want to buy flood insurance from Goldman Sachs only to find, when the flood came, Goldman Sachs washed away and unable to pay him off. As the value of the insurance contract changed—say, as floodwaters approached but before they actually destroyed the building—he wanted Goldman Sachs and Deutsche Bank to post collateral, to reflect the increase in value of what he owned.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 49</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The U.S. mortgage bond market was huge, bigger than the market for U.S. Treasury notes and bonds. The entire economy was premised on its stability, and its stability in turn depended on house prices continuing to rise. “It is ludicrous to believe that asset bubbles can only be recognized in hindsight,” he wrote. “There are specific identifiers that are entirely recognizable during the bubble’s inflation. One hallmark of mania is the rapid rise in the incidence and complexity of fraud…. The FBI reports mortgage-related fraud is up fivefold since 2000.” Bad behavior was no longer on the fringes of an otherwise sound economy; it was its central feature.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 54</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;At some point in between 1986 and 2006 a memo had gone out on Wall Street, saying that if you wanted to keep on getting rich shuffling bits of paper around to no obvious social purpose, you had better camouflage your true nature. Greg Lippmann was incapable of disguising himself or his motives. “I don’t have any particular allegiance to Deutsche Bank,” he’d say. “I just work there.” This was not an unusual attitude. What was unusual was that Lippmann said&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 63</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Lippmann himself described it more bluntly to a Deutsche Bank colleague who had seen the presentation and dubbed him “Chicken Little.” “Fuck you,” Lippmann had said. “I’m short your house.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 65</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;It didn’t matter whether Düsseldorf was buying actual cash subprime mortgage bonds or selling credit default swaps on those same mortgage bonds, as they amounted to one and the same thing: the long side of the bet.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 67</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Eisman really only had a couple of questions. The first: Tell me again how the hell a credit default swap works? The second: Why are you asking me to bet against bonds your own firm is creating, and arranging for the rating agencies to mis-rate? “In my entire life I never saw a sell-side guy come in and say, ‘Short my market,’” said Eisman.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 67</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;There was more than one way to think about Mike Burry’s purchase of a billion dollars in credit default swaps. The first was as a simple, even innocent, insurance contract. Burry made his semiannual premium payments and, in return, received protection against the default of a billion dollars’ worth of bonds. He’d either be paid zero, if the triple-B-rated bonds he’d insured proved good, or a billion dollars, if those triple-B-rated bonds went bad. But of course Mike Burry didn’t own any triple-B-rated subprime mortgage bonds, or anything like them. He had no property to “insure” it was as if he had bought fire insurance on some slum with a history of burning down. To him, as to Steve Eisman, a credit default swap wasn’t insurance at all but an outright speculative bet against the market—and this was the second way to think about&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 74</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The details were complicated, but the gist of this new money machine was not: It turned a lot of dicey loans into a pile of bonds, most of which were triple-A-rated, then it took the lowest-rated of the remaining bonds and turned most of those into triple-A CDOs. And then—because it could not extend home loans fast enough to create a sufficient number of lower-rated bonds—it used credit default swaps to replicate the very worst of the existing bonds, many times over.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 76</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Goldman would buy the triple-A tranche of some CDO, pair it off with the credit default swaps AIG sold Goldman that insured the tranche (at a cost well below the yield on the tranche), declare the entire package risk-free, and hold it off its balance sheet. Of course, the whole thing wasn’t risk-free: If AIG went bust, the insurance was worthless, and Goldman could lose everything. Today Goldman Sachs is, to put it mildly, unhelpful when asked to explain exactly what it did,&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 266</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The original home mortgage loans on whose fate both sides were betting played no other role. In a funny way, they existed only so that their fate might be gambled upon.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 77</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;If credit default swaps were insurance, why weren’t they regulated as insurance? Why, for example, wasn’t AIG required to reserve capital against them? Why, for that matter, were Moody’s and Standard &amp; Poor’s willing to bless 80 percent of a pool of dicey mortgage loans with the same triple-A rating they bestowed on the debts of the U.S. Treasury? Why didn’t someone, anyone, inside Goldman Sachs stand up and say, “This is obscene. The rating agencies, the ultimate pricers of all these subprime mortgage loans, clearly do not understand the risk, and their idiocy is creating a recipe for catastrophe”?&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 78</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Confronted with the new fact—that his company was effectively long $50 billion in triple-B subprime mortgage bonds, masquerading as triple-A-rated diversified pools of consumer loans—Cassano at first sought to rationalize it. He clearly thought that any money he received for selling default insurance on highly rated bonds was free money. For the bonds to default, he now said, U.S. house prices had to fall, and Joe Cassano didn’t believe house prices could ever fall everywhere in the country at once. After all, Moody’s and S&amp;P had both rated this stuff triple-A!&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 88</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Either piece of news—rising ratings standards or falling house prices—should have disrupted the subprime bond market and caused the price of insuring the bonds to rise. Instead, the price of insuring the bonds fell. Insurance on the crappiest triple-B tranche of a subprime mortgage bond now cost less than 2 percent a year. “We finally just did a trade with Lippmann,” says Eisman. “Then we tried to figure out what we’d done.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 95</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Which of these poor Americans were likely to jump which way with their finances? How much did their home prices need to fall for their loans to blow up? Which mortgage originators were the most corrupt? Which Wall Street firms were creating the most dishonest mortgage bonds? What kind of people, in which parts of the country, exhibited the highest degree of financial irresponsibility?&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 96</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Wall Street bond trading desks, staffed by people making seven figures a year, set out to coax from the brain-dead guys making high five figures the highest possible ratings for the worst possible loans.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 99</div></div><p>The Lukas criterium (as defined by Mark Blyth: Any system with rules will, at some point, be gamed.)</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;To meet the rating agencies’ standards—to maximize the percentage of triple-A-rated bonds created from any given pool of loans—the average FICO score of the borrowers in the pool needed to be around 615. There was more than one way to arrive at that average number. And therein lay a huge opportunity. A pool of loans composed of borrowers all of whom had a FICO score of 615 was far less likely to suffer huge losses than a pool of loans composed of borrowers half of whom had FICO scores of 550 and half of whom had FICO scores of 680. A person with a FICO score of 550 was virtually certain to default and should never have been lent money in the first place. But the hole in the rating agencies’ models enabled the loan to be made, as long as a borrower with a FICO score of 680 could be found to offset the deadbeat, and keep the average at 615.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 99</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Apparently the agencies didn’t grasp the difference between a “thin-file” FICO score and a “thick-file” FICO score. A thin-file FICO score implied, as it sounds, a short credit history. The file was thin because the borrower hadn’t done much borrowing. Immigrants who had never failed to repay a debt, because they had never been given a loan, often had surprisingly high thin-file FICO scores. Thus a Jamaican baby nurse or Mexican strawberry picker with an income of $14,000 looking to borrow three-quarters of a million dollars, when filtered through the models at Moody’s and S&amp;P, became suddenly more useful, from a credit-rigging point of view.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 100</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Barbell-shaped loan pools, with lots of very low and very high FICO scores in them, were a bargain compared to pools clustered around the 615 average—at least until the rest of Wall Street caught on to the hole in the brains of the rating agencies and bid up their prices.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 101</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;As the bonds were all priced off the Moody’s rating, the most overpriced bonds were the bonds that had been most ineptly rated. And the bonds that had been most ineptly rated were the bonds that Wall Street firms had tricked the rating agencies into rating most ineptly. “I cannot fucking believe this is allowed,” said Eisman. “I must have said that one thousand times.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 101</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;He was shocked how much easier and cheaper it was to buy a credit default swap than it was to sell short an actual cash bond—even though they represented exactly the same bet. “I did half a billion. They said, ‘Would you like to do a billion?’ And I said, ‘Why am I pussyfooting around?’ It took two or three days to place twenty-five billion.” Paulson had never encountered a market in which an investor could sell short 25 billion dollars’ worth of a stock or bond without causing its price to move, even crash. “And we could have done fifty billion, if we’d wanted to.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 107</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The underlying mortgage loans were already going sour, and yet the prices of the bonds backed by the loans hadn’t budged. “That was the part that was so weird,” said Charlie. “They’d already started going bad. We just kept asking, ‘Who the hell is taking the other side of this trade?’ And the answer that kept coming back to us was, ‘It’s the CDOs.’”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 126</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;yet fully 80 percent of the CDO composed of nothing but triple-B bonds was rated higher than triple-B: triple-A, double-A, or A. To wipe out any triple-B bond—the ground floor of the building—all that was needed was a 7 percent loss in the underlying pool of home loans. That same 7 percent loss would thus wipe out, entirely, any CDO made up of triple-B bonds, no matter what rating was assigned it. “It took us weeks to really grasp it because it was so weird,” said Charlie. “But the more we looked at what a CDO really was, the more we were like, Holy shit, that’s just fucking crazy. That’s fraud. Maybe you can’t prove it in a court of law. But it’s fraud.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 129</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;It was also a stunning opportunity: The market appeared to believe its own lie. It charged a lot less for insurance on a putatively safe double-A-rated slice of a CDO than it did for insurance on the openly risky triple-B-rated bonds. Why pay 2 percent a year to bet directly against triple-B-rated bonds when they could pay 0.5 percent a year to make effectively the same bet against the double-A-rated slice of the CDO? If they paid four times less to make what was effectively the same bet against triple-B-rated subprime mortgage bonds, they could afford to make four times more of it.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 129</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;They didn’t realize yet that the bonds inside their CDOs were actually credit default swaps on the bonds, and so their CDOs weren’t ordinary CDOs but synthetic CDOs, or that the bonds on which the swaps were based had been handpicked by Mike Burry and Steve Eisman and others betting against the market. In many ways, they were still innocents.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 134</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Some of Lippmann’s former converts suspected that the subprime mortgage bond market was rigged by Wall Street to insure that credit default swaps would never pay off; others began to wonder if the investors on the other side of their bet might know something that they didn’t; and some simply wearied of paying insurance premiums to bet against bonds that never seemed to move.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 137</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Eisman had a curious way of listening; he didn’t so much listen to what you were saying as subcontract to some remote region of his brain the task of deciding whether whatever you were saying was worth listening to, while his mind went off to play on its own. As a result, he never actually heard what you said to him the first time you said it. If his mental subcontractor detected a level of interest in what you had just said, it radioed a signal to the mother ship, which then wheeled around with the most intense focus. “Say that again,” he’d say. And you would! Because now Eisman was so obviously listening to you, and, as he listened so selectively, you felt flattered&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 139</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Later, whenever Eisman set out to explain to others the origins of the financial crisis, he’d start with his dinner with Wing Chau. Only now did he fully appreciate the central importance of the so-called mezzanine CDO—the CDO composed mainly of triple-B-rated subprime mortgage bonds—and its synthetic counterpart: the CDO composed entirely of credit default swaps on triple-B-rated subprime mortgage bonds. “You have to understand this,” he’d say. “This was the engine of doom.” He’d draw a picture of several towers of debt. The first tower was the original subprime loans that had been piled together. At the top of this tower was the triple-A tranche, just below it the double-A tranche, and so on down to the riskiest, triple-B tranche—the bonds Eisman had bet against. The Wall Street firms had taken these triple-B tranches—the worst of the worst—to build yet another tower of bonds: a CDO. A collateralized debt obligation. The reason they’d done this is that the rating agencies, presented with the pile of bonds backed by dubious loans, would pronounce 80 percent of the bonds in it triple-A. These bonds could then be sold to investors—pension funds, insurance companies—which were allowed to invest only in highly rated securities.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 140</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Now that AIG had exited the market, the main buyers were CDO managers like Wing Chau. All by himself, Chau generated vast demand for the riskiest slices of subprime mortgage bonds, for which there had previously been essentially no demand. This demand led inexorably to the supply of new home loans, as material for the bonds.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 140</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;That’s when Steve Eisman finally understood the madness of the machine. He and Vinny and Danny had been making these side bets with Goldman Sachs and Deutsche Bank on the fate of the triple-B tranche of subprime mortgage–backed bonds without fully understanding why those firms were so eager to accept them. Now he was face-to-face with the actual human being on the other side of his credit default swaps. Now he got it: The credit default swaps, filtered through the CDOs, were being used to replicate bonds backed by actual home loans. There weren’t enough Americans with shitty credit taking out loans to satisfy investors’ appetite for the end product.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 143</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Wall Street needed his bets in order to synthesize more of them. “They weren’t satisfied getting lots of unqualified borrowers to borrow money to buy a house they couldn’t afford,” said Eisman. “They were creating them out of whole cloth. One hundred times over! That’s why the losses in the financial system are so much greater than just the subprime loans. That’s when I realized they needed us to keep the machine running. I was like, This is allowed?”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 143</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;There was only one answer: The triple-A ratings gave everyone an excuse to ignore the risks they were running.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 144</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;He walked around the Las Vegas casino incredulous at the spectacle before him: seven thousand people, all of whom seemed delighted with the world as they found it. A society with deep, troubling economic problems had rigged itself to disguise those problems, and the chief beneficiaries of the deceit were its financial middlemen.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 154</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;“The ratings agency people were all like government employees.” Collectively they had more power than anyone in the bond markets, but individually they were nobodies. “They’re underpaid,” said Eisman. “The smartest ones leave for Wall Street firms so they can help manipulate the companies they used to work for. There should be no greater thing you can do as an analyst than to be the Moody’s analyst. It should be, ‘I can’t go higher as an analyst.’ Instead it’s the bottom! No one gives a fuck if Goldman likes General Electric paper. If Moody’s downgrades GE paper, it is a big deal. So why does the guy at Moody’s want to work at Goldman Sachs? The guy who is the bank analyst at Goldman Sachs should want to go to Moody’s. It should be that elite.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 156</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;In Vegas the question lingering at the back of their minds ceased to be, Do these bond market people know something we do not? It was replaced by, Do they deserve merely to be fired, or should they be put in jail? Are they delusional, or do they know what they’re doing? Danny thought that the vast majority of the people in the industry were blinded by their interests and failed to see the risks they had created. Vinny, always darker, said, “There were more morons than crooks, but the crooks were higher up.” The rating agencies were about as low as you could go and still be in the industry, and the people who worked for them really did not seem to know just how badly they had been gamed by big Wall Street firms. Their&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 158</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;To Charlie and Ben and Jamie it seemed perfectly clear that Wall Street was propping up the price of these CDOs so that they might either dump losses on unsuspecting customers or make a last few billion dollars from a corrupt market. In either case, they were squeezing and selling the juice from oranges that were undeniably rotten.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 165</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Complicated financial stuff was being dreamed up for the sole purpose of lending money to people who could never repay it.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 179</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;To some meaningful number of his investors, it looked as if Burry simply did not want to accept the judgment of the marketplace: He’d made a bad bet and was failing to accept his loss. But to Burry, the judgment of the marketplace was fraudulent, and Joel Greenblatt didn’t know what he was talking about. “It became clear to me that they still didn’t understand the [credit default swap] positions,” he said.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 191</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;That the panic inside Wall Street firms had begun before June 25 suggested to Michael Burry mainly that the Wall Street firms might be working with inside information about the remittance data. “The dealers often owned [mortgage] servicers,” he wrote, “and might have been able to get an inside track on the deterioration in the numbers.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 197</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;I was in a state of perpetual disbelief. I would have thought that someone would have recognized what was coming before June 2007. If it really took that June remit data to cause a sudden realization, well, it makes me wonder what a ‘Wall Street analyst’ really does all day.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 198</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Morgan Stanley was making a bet not on the entire pool of subprime home loans but on the few loans in the pool least likely to be repaid. The size of the bet, however, remained the same as if no loan in the pool was ever repaid. They had bought flood insurance that, if a drop of water so much as grazed any part of the house, paid them the value of the entire house.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 202</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Between September 2006 and January 2007, the highest-status bond trader inside Morgan Stanley had, for all practical purposes, purchased $16 billion in triple-A-rated CDOs, composed entirely of triple-B-rated subprime mortgage bonds, which became valueless when the underlying pools of subprime loans experienced losses of roughly 8 percent. In effect, Howie Hubler was betting that some of the triple-B-rated subprime bonds would go bad, but not all of them. He was smart enough to be cynical about his market but not smart enough to realize how cynical he needed to be.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 206</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;VaR measured only the degree to which a given stock or bond had jumped around in the past, with the recent movements receiving a greater emphasis than movements in the more distant past. Having never fluctuated much in value, triple-A-rated subprime-backed CDOs registered on Morgan Stanley’s internal reports as virtually riskless.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 207</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Triple-A-rated subprime CDOs, of which there were now hundreds of billions of dollars’ worth buried inside various Wall Street firms, and which were assumed to be riskless, were now, according to Greg Lippmann, only worth 70 cents on the dollar.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 212</div></div><p>And when marked to market, you have to pay the premium to ensure the bulk of the expected payment is in the right hands.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;At which point Greg Lippmann just said, Dude, fuck your model. I’ll make you a market. They are seventy–seventy-seven. You have three choices. You can sell them back to me at seventy. You can buy some more at seventy-seven. Or you can give me my fucking one point two billion dollars. Morgan Stanley didn’t want to buy any more subprime mortgage bonds. Howie Hubler didn’t want to buy any more subprime-backed bonds: He’d released his grip on the rope that tethered him to the rising balloon. Yet he didn’t want to take a loss, and insisted that, despite his unwillingness to buy more at 77, his triple-A CDOs were still worth 95 cents on the dollar.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 213</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;In taking Cornwall’s credit default swaps off its hands, neither UBS nor any of their other Wall Street buyers expressed the faintest reservations that they were now assuming the risk that Bear Stearns might fail:&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 222</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;How do you explain to an innocent citizen of the free world the importance of a credit default swap on a double-A tranche of a subprime-backed collateralized debt obligation?&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 222</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;To his founding investor, Gotham Capital, he shot off an unsolicited e-mail that said only, “You’re welcome.” He’d already decided to kick them out of the fund, and insist that they sell their stake in his business. When they asked him to suggest a price, he replied, “How about you keep the tens of millions you nearly prevented me from earning for you last year and we call it even?”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 223</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;There was now hardly an important figure on Wall Street whom Eisman had not insulted, or tried to. At a public event in Hong Kong, after the chairman of HSBC had claimed that his bank’s subprime losses were “contained,” Eisman had raised his hand and said, “You don’t actually believe that, do you? Because your whole book is fucked.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 229</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;At the end of 2007, Bear Stearns had nevertheless invited Eisman to a warm and fuzzy meet and greet with their new CEO, Alan Schwartz. Christmas with Bear, they called it. Schwartz told his audience how “crazy” the subprime bond market was, as no one in it seemed to be able to agree on the price of any given bond. “And whose fault is that?” Eisman had blurted out. “This is how you guys wanted it. So you could rip off your customers.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 230</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;“The upper classes of this country raped this country. You fucked people. You built a castle to rip people off. Not once in all these years have I come across a person inside a big Wall Street firm who was having a crisis of conscience. Nobody ever said, ‘This is wrong.’ And no one ever gave a shit about what I had to say.” Actually, Eisman didn’t speak those final sentences that morning; he merely thought them.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 232</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;On Tuesday the U.S. Federal Reserve announced that it had lent $85 billion to the insurance company AIG, to pay off the losses on the subprime credit default swaps AIG had sold to Wall Street banks—the biggest of which was the $13.9 billion AIG owed to Goldman Sachs. When you added in the $8.4 billion in cash AIG had already forked over to Goldman in collateral, you saw that Goldman had transferred more than $20 billion in subprime mortgage bond risk into the insurance company, which was in one way or another being covered by the U.S. taxpayer. That fact alone was enough to make everyone wonder at once how much more of this stuff was out there, and who owned it.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 237</div></div><p>No, it makes me think that the people at the Fed were in cahoots with Goldman. Wait, the Fed is a council of the heads of banks … the Fed is Goldman?</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Merrill Lynch, which had begun by saying they had $7 billion in losses, now admitted the number was over $50 billion. Citigroup appeared to have about $60 billion. Morgan Stanley had its own $9-plus billion hit, and who knew what behind it. “We’d been wrong in our interpretation of what was going on,” said Charlie. “We had always assumed that they sold the triple-A CDOs to, like, the Korean Farmers Corporation. The way they were all blowing up implied they hadn’t. They’d kept it themselves.” The big Wall Street firms, seemingly so shrewd and self-interested, had somehow become the dumb money. The people who ran them did not understand their own businesses, and their regulators obviously knew even less.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 244</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The changes were camouflage. They helped to distract outsiders from the truly profane event: the growing misalignment of interests between the people who trafficked in financial risk and the wider culture. The surface rippled, but down below, in the depths, the bonus pool remained undisturbed.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 254</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;What are the odds that people will make smart decisions about money if they don’t need to make smart decisions—if they can get rich making dumb decisions? The incentives on Wall Street were all wrong; they’re still all wrong.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 257</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;All that was clear was that the profits to be had from smart people making complicated bets overwhelmed anything that could be had from servicing customers, or allocating capital to productive enterprise.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 258</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;At the top of Charlie Ledley’s list of concerns, after Cornwall Capital had laid its bets against subprime loans, was that the powers that be might step in at any time to prevent individual American subprime mortgage borrowers from failing. The powers that be never did that, of course. Instead they stepped in to prevent the failure of the big Wall Street firms that had contrived to bankrupt themselves by making a lot of dumb bets on subprime borrowers.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 259</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;U.S. Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson, persuaded the U.S. Congress that he needed $700 billion to buy subprime mortgage assets from banks. Thus was born TARP, which stood for Troubled Asset Relief Program. Once handed the money, Paulson abandoned his promised strategy and instead essentially began giving away billions of dollars to Citigroup, Morgan Stanley, Goldman Sachs, and a few others unnaturally selected for survival. For instance, the $13 billion AIG owed to Goldman Sachs, as a result of its bet on subprime mortgage loans, was paid off in full by the U.S. government: 100 cents on the dollar. These fantastic handouts—plus the implicit government guarantee that came with them—not only prevented Wall Street firms from failing but spared them from recognizing the losses in their subprime mortgage portfolios.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 260</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;succeed. This new regime—free money for capitalists, free markets for everyone else—plus the more or less instant rewriting of financial history vexed all sorts of people, but few were as enthusiastically vexed as Steve Eisman. The world’s most powerful and most highly paid financiers had been entirely discredited; without government intervention every single one of them would have lost his job; and yet those same financiers were using the government to enrich themselves.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 262</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;“I can understand why Goldman Sachs would want to be included in the conversation about what to do about Wall Street,” he said. “What I can’t understand is why anyone would listen to them.” In Eisman’s view, the unwillingness of the U.S. government to allow the bankers to fail was less a solution than a symptom of a still deeply dysfunctional financial system.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 262</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The ability of Wall Street traders to see themselves in their success and their management in their failure would later be echoed, when their firms, which disdained the need for government regulation in good times, insisted on being rescued by government in bad times. Success was individual achievement; failure was a social problem.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 266</div></div>      </div>
      </div>
        <div class="footer">
    <div class="footer-data"><div class="footer-links"><ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/contact.php" title="">Contact</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/support.php" title="">Support</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/privacy.php" title="">Privacy</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/rights.php" title="">Rights</a></li></ul></div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="copyright">Copyright (c) 1999-2026 earthli.com. All Rights Reserved.</div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="versions">Powered by <ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore/app_news.php">earthli News 3.7</a></li><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore" title="">earthli WebCore&trade; 3.7</a></li></ul></div></div>    </div>
      </div>
  </div>  </body>
</html>
]]>
  </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
      <title type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[The Swift Programming Language (Swift 3.0.1) by Apple Inc (2016) (read in 2017)]]>
  </title>
    <id>https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3366</id>
    <link href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3366"/>
    <updated>2017-01-31T09:00:03+01:00</updated>
    <author>
        <name type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[Marco von Ballmoos]]>
  </name>
      <uri>https://earthli.com/users/marco</uri>
    </author>
      <summary type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<blockquote class="quote abstract "><div>Disclaimer: these are notes I took while reading this book. They include citations I found interesting or enlightening or particularly well-written. In some cases, I&rsquo;ve pointed out which of these applies to which citation; in others, I have not. Any benefit you gain from reading these notes is... [<a class="complete-text-link" href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3366">More</a>]</div></blockquote>]]>
  </summary>
      <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<html lang="en">
  <head>
    <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/themes/ice.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/fonts/raleway.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/core/medium.css">
  </head>
  <body>
<div class="style-controls">  <div class="page">
    <div class="page-body">
<div class="info-box-top">
<p>
Published by <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_user.php?name=marco" title="Marco von Ballmoos" class="visible">marco</a> on <span class="date-time">31. Jan 2017 09:00:03 (GMT-5)</span>
</p>
</div>
      <div class="text-flow wide">
  <blockquote class="quote abstract "><div>Disclaimer: these are notes I took while reading this book. They include citations I found interesting or enlightening or particularly well-written. In some cases, I&rsquo;ve pointed out which of these applies to which citation; in others, I have not. Any benefit you gain from reading these notes is purely incidental to the purpose they serve of reminding me what I once read. Please see Wikipedia for a summary if I&rsquo;ve failed to provide one sufficient for your purposes. If my notes serve to trigger an interest in this book, then I&rsquo;m happy for you.</div></blockquote><p>This is an incredibly detailed language specification for Swift and programming guide for iOS and OS X. The language itself is quite complex and includes so many programming features that it&rsquo;s nearly dizzying. There are a lot of examples, as well as English-language translations of all of the examples. This leads to a lot of text, but you can get into the rhythm of skipping the few paragraphs after the examples to move on to the next concepts (especially if the code sample was abundantly clear).</p>
<p>The kitchen sink includes:</p>
<ul>
<li>Functional switch statements (matching)</li>
<li>Inferred types</li>
<li>Argument labels</li>
<li>Very wordy Error-handling
<li><div>An unbelievable number of keywords:<ul>
<li><code>autoclosure</code>: required when the developer wants to avoid closing over certain variables and creating cycles (which the reference-counter in Swift cannot break on its own)</li>
<li><code>convenience</code>: identifies initialization methods that are not required</li>
<li><code>convention</code>: </li>
<li><code>defer</code>: Swift&rsquo;s version of <code>finally</code></li>
<li><code>deprecated</code>: An attribute to indicate when a feature was deprecated (see <code>obsoleted</code>)</li>
<li><code>discardableResult</code>: functions are pure and results must be used; add this attribute to allow a result to be ignored</li>
<li><code>dynamic</code>: trigger the compiler to use Objective-C–style method-dispatch</li>
<li><code>escaping</code>: indicate that a lambda parameter is used outside of the called function</li>
<li><code>extension</code>: add features to a type</li>
<li><code>infix</code>: operator type</li>
<li><code>introduced</code>: An attribute to indicate when a feature was introduced</li>
<li><code>lazy</code>: explicitly indicate that a property initialization should be delayed until it is first called</li>
<li><code>obsoleted</code>: An attribute to indicate when a feature was made obsolete (see <code>deprecated</code>)</li>
<li><code>optional</code>: a feature of a protocol that does not have to be implemented in the implementing type (it can be satisfied by an <code>extension</code> instead)</li>
<li><code>postfix</code>: operator type</li>
<li><code>prefix</code>: operator type</li>
<li><code>required</code>: identifies initialization methods that are not convenience</li>
<li><code>subscript</code>: an indexer function (e.g. <code>[<em>x</em>]</code>)</li>
<li><code>testable</code>: an attribute that subverts the type/member/function visibility so that a test framework has access to internals</li>
<li><code>unowned</code>: use a weak reference that allows the owner to cascade-delete the object that has the unowned reference to it</li>
<li><code>weak</code>: a classic weak reference: the reference will be set to <code>nil</code> when the referenced object is deleted.</li>
<li>two types of generic constraints</li>
<li>and so on…</li></ul></div></ul><h2>Citations</h2><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;Sometimes it is clear from a program’s structure that an optional will always have a value, after that value is first set. In these cases, it is useful to remove the need to check and unwrap the optional’s value every time it is accessed, because it can be safely assumed to have a value all of the time.</p>
<p>&ldquo;These kinds of optionals are defined as implicitly unwrapped optionals. You write an implicitly unwrapped optional by placing an exclamation mark (String!) rather than a question mark (String?) after the type that you want to make optional.&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption"><cite>Page 81</cite></div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;A recursive enumeration is an enumeration that has another instance of the enumeration as the associated value for one or more of the enumeration cases. You indicate that an enumeration case is recursive by writing indirect before it, which tells the compiler to insert the necessary layer of indirection.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption"><cite>Page 295</cite></div></div><p>These are pretty interesting. The arithmetic example is a very elegant way of implementing this behavior.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Use a weak reference when the other instance has a shorter lifetime—that is, when the other instance can be deallocated first. In the Apartment example above, it is appropriate for an apartment to be able to have no tenant at some point in its lifetime, and so a weak reference is an appropriate way to break the reference cycle in this case. In contrast, use an unowned reference when the other instance has the same lifetime or a longer lifetime.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption"><cite>Page 455</cite></div></div><p>You can&rsquo;t pass a struct or enum by reference, so you&rsquo;re bound to value/ref usage at <em>type-declaration</em> time. That&rsquo;s a pretty harsh restriction.</p>
<p>Deallocation is also immediate ([A]utomatic [R]eference [C]ounting takes care of it). This means that it is also predictable (unlike disposal/finalization in C#)</p>
<p>It also means, however, that allocation cycles can only be resolved with developer intervention</p>
<p>So….as usual, Swift solves it with multiple tools: <code>weak</code> and <code>unowned</code> references.</p>
<p>Weak = set to null<br>
Unowned = cascade</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;In systems that use garbage collection, weak pointers are sometimes used to implement a simple caching mechanism because objects with no strong references are deallocated only when memory pressure triggers garbage collection. However, with ARC, values are deallocated as soon as their last strong reference is removed, making weak references unsuitable for such a purpose.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption"><cite>Page 460</cite></div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;You indicate an unsafe unowned reference by writing unowned(unsafe). If you try to access an unsafe unowned reference after the instance that it refers to is deallocated, your program will try to access the memory location where the instance used to be, which is an unsafe operation.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption"><cite>Page 465</cite></div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;However, there is a third scenario, in which both properties should always have a value, and neither property should ever be nil once initialization is complete. In this scenario, it is useful to combine an unowned property on one class with an implicitly unwrapped optional property on the other class.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption"><cite>Page 466</cite></div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Because capitalCity has a default nil value, a new Country instance is considered fully initialized as soon as the Country instance sets its name property within its initializer. This means that the Country initializer can start to reference and pass around the implicit self property as soon as the name property is set. The Country initializer can therefore pass self as one of the parameters for the City initializer when the Country initializer is setting its own capitalCity property.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption"><cite>Page 468</cite></div></div><p>This is a very curious way of handling initialization. The ordering of parameter initialization determines at which point <code>self</code> can be used.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Swift requires you to write self.someProperty or self.someMethod() (rather than just someProperty or someMethod()) whenever you refer to a member of self within a closure. This helps you remember that it’s possible to capture self by accident.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption"><cite>Page 475</cite></div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Sometimes you know a throwing function or method won’t, in fact, throw an error at runtime. On those occasions, you can write try! before the expression to disable error propagation and wrap the call in a runtime assertion that no error will be thrown. If an error actually is thrown, you’ll get a runtime error.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption"><cite>Page 513</cite></div></div>      </div>
      </div>
        <div class="footer">
    <div class="footer-data"><div class="footer-links"><ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/contact.php" title="">Contact</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/support.php" title="">Support</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/privacy.php" title="">Privacy</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/rights.php" title="">Rights</a></li></ul></div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="copyright">Copyright (c) 1999-2026 earthli.com. All Rights Reserved.</div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="versions">Powered by <ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore/app_news.php">earthli News 3.7</a></li><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore" title="">earthli WebCore&trade; 3.7</a></li></ul></div></div>    </div>
      </div>
  </div>  </body>
</html>
]]>
  </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
      <title type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[Oblivion: Stories by David Foster Wallace (2005) (read in 2016)]]>
  </title>
    <id>https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3280</id>
    <link href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3280"/>
    <updated>2017-01-01T17:25:54+01:00</updated>
    <author>
        <name type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[Marco von Ballmoos]]>
  </name>
      <uri>https://earthli.com/users/marco</uri>
    </author>
      <summary type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<blockquote class="quote abstract "><div>Disclaimer: these are notes I took while reading this book. They include citations I found interesting or enlightening or particularly well-written. In some cases, I&rsquo;ve pointed out which of these applies to which citation; in others, I have not. Any benefit you gain from reading these notes is... [<a class="complete-text-link" href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3280">More</a>]</div></blockquote>]]>
  </summary>
      <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<html lang="en">
  <head>
    <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/themes/ice.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/fonts/raleway.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/core/medium.css">
  </head>
  <body>
<div class="style-controls">  <div class="page">
    <div class="page-body">
<div class="info-box-top">
<p>
Published by <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_user.php?name=marco" title="Marco von Ballmoos" class="visible">marco</a> on <span class="date-time">1. Jan 2017 17:25:54 (GMT-5)</span>
</p>
</div>
      <div class="text-flow wide">
  <blockquote class="quote abstract "><div>Disclaimer: these are notes I took while reading this book. They include citations I found interesting or enlightening or particularly well-written. In some cases, I&rsquo;ve pointed out which of these applies to which citation; in others, I have not. Any benefit you gain from reading these notes is purely incidental to the purpose they serve of reminding me what I once read. Please see Wikipedia for a summary if I&rsquo;ve failed to provide one sufficient for your purposes. If my notes serve to trigger an interest in this book, then I&rsquo;m happy for you.</div></blockquote><p>This is a collection of short stories about various topics. Wallace&rsquo;s strength is in his exquisitely detailed and precise prose. He tells his stories through the subconscious ramblings of his characters, over interwoven and using tens of pages to describe a split second. Two of the stories are almost novellas; others are very, very short. Many of them have the feel of books that he started and never quite finished. There&rsquo;s also almost always that vague feeling of self-psychoanalysis, with characters exhibiting and working their way through insecurities that Wallace himself was known to have.</p>
<p>The details of the stories are almost always vaguely bizarre: one unnamed and un-narrated character climbs a building in a blow-up advertising suit (<em>Mister Squishy</em>), in another a thread of thought about the litigation associated with his (formerly) secret black-widow farm haunts a man whose mother&rsquo;s botched plastic surgery makes her look constantly surprised, another is a school-hostage situation, as told by a daydreamer who nearly missed the whole thing but can recount the nano-details of daydream in a way that nearly supplants the &ldquo;main&rdquo; thread, another is the story of a man in psychoanalysis who reveals onion-skinned lies to eventually admit why he killed himself in a violent car accident, there is the man who is convinced he doesn&rsquo;t snore, the harpy to whom he&rsquo;s married who is convinced that he does, but both suffer from rare and strange disorders that mean they&rsquo;re both right and wrong and, finally, there&rsquo;s the final story, which is again set in the (at least semi-) bureaucratic world of advertising and market-analysis, which feels like a run at a chapter out of <em>Infinite Jest</em>.</p>
<p>The first story did as well, and made me want to read <em>The Pale King</em>, although I&rsquo;d heard that that work was unfinished. Although dissatisfying in the sense that the narrative loop isn&rsquo;t closed, even an unfinished David Foster Wallace story is a breathtaking jewel. [1]</p>
<h2>Citations</h2><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Inspired, according to agency rumor, by an R.S.B. Creative Director’s epiphanic encounter with something billed as Death by Chocolate in a Near North café, Felonies! were all-chocolate, filling and icing and cake as well, and in fact all-real-or-fondant-chocolate instead of the usual hydrogenated cocoa and high-F corn syrup, Felonies! conceived thus less as a variant on rivals’ Zingers, Ding Dongs, Ho Hos, and Choco-Diles than as a radical upscaling and re-visioning of same.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 72-76</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;A domed cylinder of flourless maltilol-flavored sponge cake covered entirely in 2.4mm of a high-lecithin chocolate frosting manufactured with trace amounts of butter, cocoa butter, baker’s chocolate, chocolate liquor, vanilla extract, dextrose, and sorbitol (a relatively high-cost frosting, and one whose butter-redundancies alone required heroic innovations in production systems and engineering—an entire production line had had to be remachined and the lineworkers retrained and production and quality-assurance quotas recalculated more or less from scratch), which high-end frosting was then also injected by high-pressure confectionery needle into the 26 × 13mm hollow ellipse in each Felony!’s center (a center which in for example Hostess Inc.’s products was packed with what amounted to a sucrotic whipped lard), resulting in double doses of an ultrarich and near-restaurant- grade frosting whose central pocket—given that the thin coat of outer frosting’s exposure to the air caused it to assume traditional icing’s hard-yet-deliquescent marzipan character—seemed even richer, denser, sweeter, and more felonious than the exterior icing, icing that in most rivals’ Field tests’ IRPs and GRDS was declared consumers’ favorite part.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 76-84</div></div><p>That&rsquo;s one sentence, with the classic double possessive near the end.<br>
&nbsp;</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;All three of these youngest members sat back on their tailbones with their legs uncrossed and their hands spread out over their thighs and their faces arranged in the mildly sullen expressions of consumers who have never once questioned their entitlement to satisfaction or meaning.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 132-134</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;sometimes taking her delicate oval eyeglasses off and not chewing on the arm but holding the glasses in such a way and in such proximity to her mouth that one got the idea she could, at any moment, put one of the frames’ arm’s plastic earguards just inside her mouth and nibble on it absently, an unconscious gesture of shyness and concentration at once.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 243-245</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;This was the most simple and obvious example of the sort of complex system of large groups’ intragroup preferences influencing one another and building exponentially on one another, much more like a nuclear chain reaction or an epidemiological transmission grid than a simple case of each individual consumer deciding privately for himself what he wanted and then going out and judiciously spending his disposable income on it.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 349-352</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;at least half the room’s men listening with what’s called half an ear while pursuing their own private lines of thought, and Schmidt had a quick vision of them all in the conference room as like icebergs and/or floes, only the sharp caps showing, unknown and -knowable to one another,&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 478-480</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;no no all that ever changed were the jargon and mechanisms and gilt rococo with which everyone in the whole huge blind grinding mechanism conspired to convince each other that they could figure out how to give the paying customer what they could prove he could be persuaded to believe he wanted, without anybody once ever saying stop a second or pointing out the absurdity of calling what they were doing collecting information or ever even saying aloud—not even Team Î”y’s Field Researchers over drinks at Beyers’ Market Pub on E. Ohio together on Fridays before going home alone to stare at the phone—what was going on or what it meant or what the simple truth was.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 699-703</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;That it made no difference. None of it.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 703-704</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;dweebs and had managed at once to acknowledge, parody, and evect&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 722-722</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;no no all that ever changed were the jargon and mechanisms and gilt rococo with which everyone in the whole huge blind grinding mechanism conspired to convince each other that they could figure out how to give the paying customer what they could prove he could be persuaded to believe he wanted, without anybody once ever saying stop a second or pointing out the absurdity of calling what they were doing collecting information or ever even saying aloud—not even Team Î”y’s Field Researchers over drinks at Beyers’ Market Pub on E. Ohio together on Fridays before going home alone to stare at the phone—what was going on or what it meant or what the simple truth was. That it made no difference. None of it.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 699-704</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Undisplayed little tracking codes could be designed to tag and follow each consumer’s w3 interests and spending patterns—&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 987-988</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;not only would there be no voir dire and no archaic per diem expenses but even the unnecessary variable of consumers even knowing they were part of any sort of market test was excised, since a consumer’s subjective awareness of his identity as a test subject instead of as a true desire-driven consumer had always been one of the distortions that market research swept under the rug because they had no way of quantifying subjective-identity-awareness on any known ANOVA. Focus Groups would go the way of the dodo and bison and art deco.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 994-997</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;According to my brother’s own flights of fancy in childhood, the antique table we had possessed before I was old enough to be aware of anything that was going on had been burled walnut, with a large number of diamonds, sapphires, and rhinestones inset in the top in the likeness of the face of Queen Elizabeth I of England (1533-1603) as seen from the right side, and that the disappointment of its loss was part of the reason our father often looked so dispirited on coming home at the end of the day.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 1184-1187</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;If asked, I could probably have told you the total number of letters, the most and the least used letters (in the latter case, a tie), as well as a number of different statistical functions by which the relative frequency of different letters’ appearance could be quantified, although I would not have put any of these data in this way, nor was I even quite aware that I could. The facts about the words were simply there, much the way a knowledge of how your tummy feels and where your arms are are there regardless of whether you’re paying attention to these parts or not.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 1372-1375</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;jesus. that gives Melville&rsquo;s infected whale a run for its money for sheer pathos&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 1407</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;did not, though, initially recall the window’s narrative including any explanation of what fate befell the smaller, subordinate feral dog, with the sore, whose name was Scraps, and had run away from home because of the way its owner mistreated it when the tedium and despair of his lower level administrative job made him come home empty-eyed and angry and drink several highballs without any ice or even a lime, and later always found some excuse to be cruel to Scraps, who had waited alone at home all day and only wanted some petting or affection or to play tug of war with a rag or dog toy in order to take its mind off of its own bored loneliness, and whose life had been so awful that the backstory cut off abruptly after the second time the man kicked Scraps in the stomach so hard that Scraps couldn’t stop coughing and yet still tried to lick the man’s hand when he picked Scraps up and threw him in the cold garage and locked him in there all night, where Scraps lay alone in a tight ball on the cement floor coughing as quietly as he could.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 1400-1407</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The tableau, complete with the unfortunate piebald dog’s mouth open in agony and a rat or mutated roach abdomen protruding from his eyesocket as the predator’s anterior half consumed his eye and inner brain, was so traumatic that this narrative line was immediately stopped and replaced with a neutral view of the pipe’s exterior.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 1463-1465</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;We often can remember the details and subjective associations far more vividly than the event itself. This explains the frequent tip-of-the-tongue feeling when trying to convey what is important about some memory or occurrence. Similarly, it is often what makes it so difficult to communicate meaningfully with others in later life. Often, the most vividly felt and remembered elements will appear at best tangential to someone else—&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 1522-1525</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;the catastatic child apparently launches into an entire protodialectical inquiry into just why exactly the interlocutor believes in jealous and temperamental Yam Gods at all, and whether this villager has ever in quiet moments closed his eyes and sat very still and gazed deep inside himself to see whether in his very heart of hearts he truly believes in these ill-tempered Yam Gods or whether he’s merely been as it were culturally conditioned from an early age to ape what he has seen his parents and all the other villagers say and do and appear to believe, and whether it has ever late at night or in the humid quiet of the rain forest’s dawn occurred to the questioner that perhaps all these others didn’t really, truly believe in petulant Yam Gods either but were themselves merely aping what they in turn saw everyone else behaving as if they believed, and so on, and whether it was possible—just as a thought-experiment if nothing else—that everyone in the entire village had at some quiet point seen into their hearts’ hearts and realized that their putative belief in the Yam Gods was mere mimicry and so felt themselves to be a secret hypocrite or fraud; and, if so, that what if just one villager of whatever caste or family suddenly stood up and admitted aloud that he was merely following empty custom and did not in his heart of hearts truly believe in any fearsome set of Yam Gods requiring propitiation to prevent drought or decimation by yam-aphids: would that villager be stoned to death, or banished, or might his admission not just possibly be met with a huge collective sigh of relief because now everyone else could be spared oppressive inner feelings of hypocrisy and self-contempt and admit their own inner disbelief as well;&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 2077-2088</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;‘You, child, who are so gifted and sagacious and wise: Is it possible that you have not realized the extent to which these primitive villagers have exaggerated your gifts, have transformed you into something you know too well you are not? Surely you have seen that they so revere you precisely because they themselves are too unwise to see your limitations? How long before they, too, see what you have seen when gazing deep inside yourself? Surely it has occurred to you. Surely one such as yourself must know already how terribly fickle the affections of a primitive Third World village can be. But tell me, child: Have you begun yet to be afraid? Have you begun yet then to plan for the day when they wake to a truth you already know: that you are not half so complete as they believe? That the illusion these children have made of you cannot be sustained?&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 2164-2170</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;This is another paradox, that many of the most important impressions and thoughts in a person’s life are ones that flash through your head so fast that fast isn’t even the right word, they seem totally different from or outside of the regular sequential clock time we all live by, and they have so little relation to the sort of linear, one-word-after-another-word English we all communicate with each other with that it could easily take a whole lifetime just to spell out the contents of one split-second’s flash of thoughts and connections, etc.—and yet we all seem to go around trying to use English (or whatever language our native country happens to use, it goes without saying) to try to convey to other people what we’re thinking and to find out what they’re thinking, when in fact deep down everybody knows it’s a charade and they’re just going through the motions. What goes on inside is just too fast and huge and all interconnected for words to do more than barely sketch the outlines of at most one tiny little part of it at any given instant. The internal head-speed or whatever of these ideas, memories, realizations, emotions and so on is even faster, by the way—exponentially faster, unimaginably faster—when you’re dying, meaning during that vanishingly tiny nanosecond between when you technically die and when the next thing happens, so that in reality the cliché about people’s whole life flashing before their eyes as they’re dying isn’t all that far off—although the whole life here isn’t really a sequential thing&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 2359-2370</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;but in the inter-office politics of the agency itself, like for example in sizing up what sorts of things your superiors want to believe (including the belief that they’re smarter than you and that that’s why they’re your superior) and then giving them what they want but doing it just subtly enough that they never get a chance to view you as a sycophant or yes-man (which they want to believe they do not really want) but instead see you as a tough-minded independent thinker who from time to time bows to the weight of their superior intelligence and creative firepower, etc. The whole agency was one big ballet of fraudulence and of manipulating people’s images of your ability to manipulate images, a virtual hall of mirrors.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 2546-2551</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;also inserted that there was also a good possibility that, when all was said and done, I was nothing but just another fast-track yuppie who couldn’t love, and that I found the banality of this unendurable, largely because I was evidently so hollow and insecure that I had a pathological need to see myself as somehow exceptional or outstanding at all times.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 2726-2729</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;which somehow entailed that real scenes like the one of my suicide note were now compelling and genuine only to their participants, and to anyone else would come off as banal and even somewhat cheesy or maudlin, which is somewhat paradoxical when you consider—as I did, sitting there at the breakfast nook—that the reason scenes like this will seem stale or manipulative to an audience is that we’ve already seen so many of them in dramas, and yet the reason we’ve seen so many of them in dramas is that the scenes really are dramatic and compelling and let people communicate very deep, complicated emotional realities that are almost impossible to articulate in any other way,&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 2774-2778</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;appointment and perhaps inquire about a prescription. And yet Hope has been wholly obdurate and unyielding on this point, insisting that it was I who was ‘the one who’s asleep,’ and that if I could or would not acknowledge this, my refusal to ‘trust’ her indicated that I must be ‘angry at [her]’ over something, or perhaps unconsciously wished to ‘hurt’ her, and that if anyone around here needed to ‘make an appointment’ it was myself, which according to Hope I would not hesitate to do if my respect and concern for her even slightly outweighed my own selfish insistence on being ‘right.’&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 3174-3178</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Nor does one hardly ever see actual flypaper anymore.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 3845-3845</div></div><p>Grammatically and semantically correct, but remarkably bitchy to read, especially considering the brevity.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The rear of the artist’s company van listed a toll free number to dial if one had any concerns about the employee’s driving.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 4093-4095</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;But when she stood up with the excuse of asking to use the bathroom, even in the midst of asking she couldn’t stand the feeling of evil and began running for the door in stocking feet in order to get out, but it was not the front door she ran for, it was the other door, even though she didn’t know where it was, except she must know because there it was, with a decorative and terribly detailed metal scarab over the knob, and whatever the overwhelming evil was was right behind it, the door, but for some reason even as she’s overcome with fear she’s also reaching for the doorknob, she’s going to open it, she can see herself starting to open it—and that’s when she wakes.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 4847-4852</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;She also had the kind of sick headache where it hurt to move her eyes, and whenever she moved her eyes she could not help but seem to feel all the complex musculature connecting her eyeballs to her brain, which made her feel even woozier.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 4941-4942</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;There was something essentially soul killing about the print of the vegetable head clown that had made Atwater want to turn it to the wall, but it was bolted or glued and could not be moved. It was really on there, and Atwater now was trying to consider whether hanging a bath towel or something over it would or would not perhaps serve to draw emotional attention to the print and make it an even more oppressive part of the room for anyone who already knew what was under the towel. Whether the painting was worse actually seen or merely, so to speak, alluded to. Standing angled at the bathroom’s exterior sink and mirror unit, it occurred to him that these were just the sorts of overabstract thoughts that occupied his mind in motels, instead of the arguably much more urgent and concrete problem of finding the television’s remote control.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 5046-5051</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The second level’s ice machine roared without cease in a large utility closet next to Atwater’s room.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 5058-5058</div></div><p>This is lovely. These are the noise levels of America brought home in one sentence.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;It is a fact of life that certain people are corrosive to others’ self esteem simply as a function of who and what they are.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 5191-5192</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;One clue that there’s something not quite real about sequential time the way you experience it is the various paradoxes of time supposedly passing and of a so-called ‘present’ that’s always unrolling into the future and creating more and more past behind it. As if the present were this car—nice car by the way—and the past is the road we’ve just gone over, and the future is the headlit road up ahead we haven’t yet gotten to, and time is the car’s forward movement, and the precise present is the car’s front bumper as it cuts through the fog of the future, so that it’s now and then a tiny bit later a whole different now, etc. Except if time is really passing, how fast does it go? At what rate does the present change? See? Meaning if we use time to measure motion or rate—which we do, it’s the only way you can—95 miles per hour, 70 heartbeats a minute, etc.—how are you supposed to measure the rate at which time moves? One second per second? It makes no sense. You can’t even talk about time flowing or moving without hitting up against paradox right away. So think for a second: What if there’s really no movement at all? What if this is all unfolding in the one flash you call the present, this first, infinitely tiny split-second of impact when the speeding car’s front bumper’s just starting to touch the abutment, just before the bumper crumples and displaces the front end and you go violently forward and the steering column comes back at your chest as if shot out of something enormous? Meaning that what if in fact this now is infinite and never really passes in the way your mind is supposedly wired to understand pass, so that not only your whole life but every single humanly conceivable way to describe and account for that life has time to flash like neon shaped into those connected cursive letters that businesses’ signs and windows love so much to use through your mind all at once in the literally immeasurable instant between impact and death, just as you start forward to meet the wheel at a rate no belt ever made could restrain—THE END.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 5356-5370</div></div><p><hr></p>
<div class="footnote-reference"><span id="footnote_DRAFTABLE_ENTRY_3280_1_body" class="footnote-number">[1]</span> As to Foster Wallace&rsquo;s style, your mileage may vary: I&rsquo;ve written the second paragraph in an approximation of his style. If that&rsquo;s already too much for you, then don&rsquo;t even bother picking up <em>Oblivion</em>.</div>      </div>
      </div>
        <div class="footer">
    <div class="footer-data"><div class="footer-links"><ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/contact.php" title="">Contact</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/support.php" title="">Support</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/privacy.php" title="">Privacy</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/rights.php" title="">Rights</a></li></ul></div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="copyright">Copyright (c) 1999-2026 earthli.com. All Rights Reserved.</div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="versions">Powered by <ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore/app_news.php">earthli News 3.7</a></li><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore" title="">earthli WebCore&trade; 3.7</a></li></ul></div></div>    </div>
      </div>
  </div>  </body>
</html>
]]>
  </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
      <title type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[The Psychopath Test by Jon Ronson (2011) (read in 2016)]]>
  </title>
    <id>https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3281</id>
    <link href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3281"/>
    <updated>2017-01-01T17:25:42+01:00</updated>
    <author>
        <name type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[Marco von Ballmoos]]>
  </name>
      <uri>https://earthli.com/users/marco</uri>
    </author>
      <summary type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<blockquote class="quote abstract "><div>Disclaimer: these are notes I took while reading this book. They include citations I found interesting or enlightening or particularly well-written. In some cases, I&rsquo;ve pointed out which of these applies to which citation; in others, I have not. Any benefit you gain from reading these notes is... [<a class="complete-text-link" href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3281">More</a>]</div></blockquote>]]>
  </summary>
      <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<html lang="en">
  <head>
    <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/themes/ice.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/fonts/raleway.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/core/medium.css">
  </head>
  <body>
<div class="style-controls">  <div class="page">
    <div class="page-body">
<div class="info-box-top">
<p>
Published by <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_user.php?name=marco" title="Marco von Ballmoos" class="visible">marco</a> on <span class="date-time">1. Jan 2017 17:25:42 (GMT-5)</span>
</p>
</div>
      <div class="text-flow wide">
  <blockquote class="quote abstract "><div>Disclaimer: these are notes I took while reading this book. They include citations I found interesting or enlightening or particularly well-written. In some cases, I&rsquo;ve pointed out which of these applies to which citation; in others, I have not. Any benefit you gain from reading these notes is purely incidental to the purpose they serve of reminding me what I once read. Please see Wikipedia for a summary if I&rsquo;ve failed to provide one sufficient for your purposes. If my notes serve to trigger an interest in this book, then I&rsquo;m happy for you.</div></blockquote><p><br>
Jon Ronson is a journalist with an eccentric beat. He seems to cover what takes his fancy and his fancy often turns to the oddest—though at least somewhat successful—members of society. In this one, he delves into the business of psychology and the nature of psychopaths.</p>
<p>He interviews various people who could be considered psychopaths, wonders whether he himself is one, takes a course with Bob Hare—world-famous as the inventor of the original psychopath checklist—to find out how to track and evaluate more professionally, then discovers that the power has gone to his head and perhaps psychopaths aren&rsquo;t another species entirely—or near-to—and there is a bandwidth of human behavior, some of which falls within norms and other that doesn&rsquo;t.</p>
<p>There are also big players involved in making sure that people think they&rsquo;re sick. Society wants to benefit from the best minds, but also doesn&rsquo;t want to be changed too much by them. It is often difficult to tell the difference between a purported psychopath and a very intellectually engaged person. Ronson realizes that the checklist approach often just takes the human element out of evaluation and ends up making bad things happen to otherwise normal people—or at least people who aren&rsquo;t a danger to anyone.</p>
<p>At the end, he addresses the medical/psychiatric/pharmaceutical industry as a whole, seeing it for the capitalist engine of self-realization that it is. The engine gets people to participate because they&rsquo;re concerned about their mental well-being, but the engine is only concerned about selling unneeded medicines and making a profit.</p>
<h2>Citations</h2><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Any psychiatrist could pick up the manual they were creating—DSM-III—and if the patient’s overt symptoms tallied with the checklist, they’d get the diagnosis. And that’s how practically every disorder you’ve ever heard of or have been diagnosed with came to be invented, inside that chaotic conference room, under the auspices of Robert Spitzer, who was taking his inspiration from checklist pioneers like Bob Hare. “Give me some examples,” I asked him. “Oh . . .” He waved his arm in the air to say there were just so many. “Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder. Borderline Personality Disorder, Attention Deficit Disorder . . .” Then there was Autism, Anorexia Nervosa, Bulimia, Panic Disorder . . . every one a brand-new disorder with its own checklist of symptoms.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 250</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;“Were there any proposals for mental disorders you rejected?” I asked Spitzer. He thought for a moment. “Yes,” he finally said. “I do remember one. Atypical Child Syndrome.” There was a short silence. “Atypical Child Syndrome?” I said. “The problem was when we tried to find out how to characterize it. I said, ‘What are the symptoms?’ The man proposing it replied, ‘That’s hard to say because the children are very atypical.’ ” He paused. “And we were going to include Masochistic Personality Disorder, but there were a bunch of feminists who were violently opposed.” “Why?” “They thought it was labeling the victim.” “What happened to it?” “We changed the name to Self-Defeating Personality Disorder and put it into the appendix.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 251</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;But DSM-III, Spitzer’s DSM, was coming in at 494 pages. He turned the checklists into interview questionnaires and sent researchers out into America to ask hundreds of thousands of people at random how they felt. It turned out that almost all of them felt terrible. And according to the new checklists, more than 50 percent of them were suffering from a mental disorder. DSM-III was a sensation. Along with its revised edition, it sold more than a million copies. Sales to civilians hugely outweighed sales to professionals. Many more copies were sold than psychiatrists existed. All over the western world people began using the checklists to diagnose themselves. For many of them it was a godsend. Something was categorically wrong with them and finally their suffering had a name. It was truly a revolution in psychiatry, and a gold rush for drug companies, who suddenly had hundreds of new disorders they could invent medications for, millions of new patients they could treat. “The pharmaceuticals were delighted with DSM,” Spitzer told me, and this in turn delighted him: “I love to hear examples of parents who say, ‘It was impossible to live with him until we gave him medication and then it was night and day.’ That’s good news for a DSM person.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 253</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;a surfeit of checklists, coupled with unscrupulous drug reps, is, Gary said, a dreadful combination.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 255</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;I wondered if sometimes the difference between a psychopath in Broadmoor and a psychopath on Wall Street was the luck of being born into a stable, rich family.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 276</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;“Ever since I went on a Bob Hare course, I’ve believed that psychopaths are monsters,” I said. “They’re just psychopaths, it’s what defines them, it’s what they are.” I paused. “But isn’t Tony kind of a semi-psychopath? A gray area? Doesn’t his story prove that people in the middle shouldn’t necessarily be defined by their maddest edges?” “I think that’s right,” he replied. “Personally I don’t like the way Bob Hare talks about psychopaths almost as if they are a different species.” Tony was standing alone now, staring at the wall. “He does have a very high level of some psychopathic traits,” he said. “He never takes responsibility, everything is somebody else’s fault, but not of others. He’s not a serious, predatory offender. So he can be a bully in the right circumstances but he doesn’t set out to do serious harm for its own sake. I would also say you can never reduce any person to a diagnostic label. Tony has many endearing qualities when you look beyond the label.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 279</div></div>      </div>
      </div>
        <div class="footer">
    <div class="footer-data"><div class="footer-links"><ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/contact.php" title="">Contact</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/support.php" title="">Support</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/privacy.php" title="">Privacy</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/rights.php" title="">Rights</a></li></ul></div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="copyright">Copyright (c) 1999-2026 earthli.com. All Rights Reserved.</div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="versions">Powered by <ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore/app_news.php">earthli News 3.7</a></li><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore" title="">earthli WebCore&trade; 3.7</a></li></ul></div></div>    </div>
      </div>
  </div>  </body>
</html>
]]>
  </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
      <title type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[Books read in 2016]]>
  </title>
    <id>https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3209</id>
    <link href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3209"/>
    <updated>2016-12-31T07:01:36+01:00</updated>
    <author>
        <name type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[Marco von Ballmoos]]>
  </name>
      <uri>https://earthli.com/users/marco</uri>
    </author>
      <summary type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<dl><dt class="field">Seveneves (2015)</dt>
<dd><div class=" "><p>by <em>Neal Stephenson</em></p>
<p>This is another epic work by Stephenson, spanning almost 900 pages and over 5000 years. He picks up some themes I&rsquo;ve seen in other books while including a lot of his standard fascination for technological detail, weaponry in particular. This is the story of the... [<a class="complete-text-link" href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3209">More</a>]</p>
</div></dd>
</dl>]]>
  </summary>
      <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<html lang="en">
  <head>
    <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/themes/ice.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/fonts/raleway.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/core/medium.css">
  </head>
  <body>
<div class="style-controls">  <div class="page">
    <div class="page-body">
<div class="info-box-top">
<p>
Published by <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_user.php?name=marco" title="Marco von Ballmoos" class="visible">marco</a> on <span class="date-time">31. Dec 2016 07:01:36 (GMT-5)</span>
</p>
</div>
      <div class="text-flow wide">
  <dl><dt class="field">Seveneves (2015)</dt>
<dd><div class=" "><p>by <em>Neal Stephenson</em></p>
<p>This is another epic work by Stephenson, spanning almost 900 pages and over 5000 years. He picks up some themes I&rsquo;ve seen in other books while including a lot of his standard fascination for technological detail, weaponry in particular. This is the story of the eradication of life as we know it on the planet Earth. Something called The Agent enters the Moon from one side and exits from the other, shattering it into seven large pieces and innumerable smaller ones. The Agent is a deus ex machina—at least for this first novel—and we cease thinking about its origins almost immediately to focus on the problems engendered by splitting the Moon.</p>
<p>I&rsquo;ve included <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3213">notes, citations and errata</a> in a separate post.</p>
</div></dd>
<dt class="field">Shift (2015)</dt>
<dd><div class=" "><p>by <em>Hugh Howey</em></p>
<p>This is the second book in the Silo series, after <em>Wool</em>. In the first book, we were introduced to the people of the Silo, what we would learn at the very end is Silo 18 of 50. This book runs prior and then parallel to <em>Wool</em>, filling in the detail as to how mankind ended up in silos. It is the story of Donald, a freshman senator and his mentor, Thurman, an experience senator, a war hero and probably the most powerful man in America, president included. It is about 30 years in our future and nanomachines are being used by the rich and powerful to prolong their lives and health. They&rsquo;re also being used by the military.</p>
<p>I&rsquo;ve included <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3218">notes, citations and errata</a> in a separate post.</p>
</div></dd>
<dt class="field">Dust (2015)</dt>
<dd><div class=" "><p>by <em>Hugh Howey</em></p>
<p>This novel picks up where Shift left off, with Juliette having returned to Silo 18. She’s mayor, Lukas is head of IT, Donald is feeding Lukas and Juliette information in an effort to help them survive while Charlotte (Donald’s sister) continues to launch drones, trying to fly far enough to see the world beyond the Silo zone. Juliette is mayor, but her people are not really behind her, because she brings tidings in which the populace is not interested. Don’t change anything. Please. She does, though. Can’t seem to stop picking that scab. So she digs to the other silo, goes outside to sample air, discovers things, talks to Donald and Charlene on the radio to find out more, to hear how they’ve pieced things together while not trusting and misinterpreting and stumbling toward some form of truth. Silo 18 follows 17's lead, 18 flees to 17, then flees the silo area for good, making good on what Donald and Charlene saw. After so much misery, hope.</p>
<p>I&rsquo;ve included <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3219">notes, citations and errata</a> in a separate post.</p>
</div></dd>
<dt class="field">Hard to be a God (1974; 1973 in English)</dt>
<dd><div class=" "><p>by <em>Arkady and Boris Strugatsky</em></p>
<p>Since the movie followed the book so faithfully, I&rsquo;ll just include some of the text from my movie review.</p>
<p>The story is of an Earth-like planet on which a similar evolutionary track was followed by a very human-like race, but they never experienced a Renaissance. Their buildings are of poor quality, their sanitation is a horror and their hygiene is non-existent. The filth is omnipresent. You can almost smell this movie. It’s incredible how absolutely everything is covered with mud, food remnants and shit. The fog and rain soak everything. Everything is of primitive construction, people shit and piss and blow their pus-running noses everywhere. They spit, they taste things, they scratch, they pick and they flick.</p>
<p>Slaves have boards around their necks—almost everyone we see is a slave of some kind. People have eyes missing. Instead of a Renaissance, a Khmer Rouge-style revolution has occurred: all books and learning and instruments and advancement have been destroyed and their purveyors and inventors put to death. One form of execution we see is upending in a latrine.</p>
<p>We follow the story of Don Rumata, an Earthman sent ostensibly to study these people but who has taken up as a God among them. We follow him from his “palace”, interacting with the various psychotic locals, to a local market (?) where he meets up with a group of other Earthlings. It is not hard to imagine that the people find him to be a God—he is so much cleaner than the others, with metal greaves and vambraces pretty much the only thing they see of him.</p>
<p>Everything’s in a terrible state of disrepair and we see the only minds allowed to work involved in building new torture devices. The “bookworms” have all been hanged and left to rot on a gallows. The dialogue is also scattered, nonsensical, but enough sense can be distilled to follow a story. Everyone is near-mad, the actions unexplainable, the destruction they wreak on their environs chaotic. Random, wanton, childish. An unenlightened world of fools. It’s impossible to imagine how such a society survives, how it feeds itself, how it staves off disease. Every scene reflects their actions, implements and armor and chains and animals and fowl and bells pinned and tied and roped and chained everywhere, covered in filth and dripping water.</p>
<p>The Strugatsky brothers certainly delivered a tour de force in this novel, a novel of science-fictional despair rather than triumph. Please see the <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3212">full movie review</a> for more detail.</p>
<p>I&rsquo;ve included <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3226">notes, citations and errata</a> in a separate post.</p>
</div></dd>
<dt class="field">The Dead Mountaineer&rsquo;s Inn (1970; 1982 in English)</dt>
<dd><div class=" "><p>by <em>Arkady and Boris Strugatsky</em></p>
<p>This is a whodunnit mystery starring Peter Glebsky as a Russian customs and counterfeit officer on vacation at a remote mountain cabin—somewhere in the Alps—with several other guests. He has traveled there alone and wishes to enjoy two weeks away from work. Classic setup.</p>
<p>The other guests are all odd in their own way: the exceedingly rich Mr. Morse and his ravishing wife, the illusionist Mr. Du Barnstoker and his androgynous and near-constantly be-sunglassed nibling Brun, Mr. Simonet, a world-renowned physicist and accomplished mountain climber, Mr. Hinckus, an odd, little and quiet attorney, as well as Olaf Andvarafors, a giant of a man in both size and personality.</p>
<p>As you can well imagine, bodies start to appear, alcohol is drunk in prodigious quantities, accusations are thrown, people disappear, odd clues are found and Glebsky is drawn ever farther from the peace and relaxation he&rsquo;d sought. The Mafia becomes involved. Some of the guests turn out to be robots.</p>
<p>This is a story of first contact. As with <em>Roadside Picnic</em>, this alien contact does not lead to any satisfying conclusion for anyone. It is depicted as confusing and fruitless as such things usually are (i.e. when two cultures collide, if only briefly). In the light of not being able know for sure anything about anything, Glebsky muses that one unsatisfying &ldquo;truth&rdquo; is as good as any other, so one might as well choose the most satisfying one.</p>
<p>I&rsquo;ve included <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3229">notes, citations and errata</a> in a separate post.</p>
</div></dd>
<dt class="field">Roadside Picnic (1972; 1977 in English)</dt>
<dd><div class=" "><p>by <em>Arkady and Boris Strugatsky</em></p>
<p>This is the book on which director Andrei Tarkovsky&rsquo;s <em>Stalker</em> was based. The world of the book has six Zones on it, areas tainted by the touch of alien contact. These areas have artifacts with fantastic properties but unknown use. The use to which humanity can put them may be incidental to their original purpose. For all intents and purposes, humanity has no chance of understanding what happened when the aliens visited—the gulf is far too great. The aliens are much too advanced for humanity to even begin to empathize or understand them.</p>
<p>We follow the story of Red Schuhart, a gifted stalker—someone who enters the Zones to pilfer artifacts—over several years, as he is hired and fired by a research company, as he goes to jail and is released to stalk again, as he tries to provide for his family, as he is trapped for his whole life in the whorl around the Zone in his town. The plot is different than the movie, though Red&rsquo;s final mission into the zone <em>roughly</em> matches up with the movie&rsquo;s plot: in the book, he seeks a wish-granting &ldquo;golden sphere&rdquo; whereas in the movie, it&rsquo;s a room.</p>
<p>I love the Strugatsky brothers&rsquo; style. It&rsquo;s very much cynical, with great characters, very much on a par with 60s and 70s-era science fiction in the the United States. This is a fantastic story and pairs extremely well with the film.</p>
<p>I&rsquo;ve included <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3230">notes, citations and errata</a> in a separate post.</p>
</div></dd>
<dt class="field">Gulliver&rsquo;s Travels (1726)</dt>
<dd><div class=" "><p>by <em>Jonathan Swift</em></p>
<p>This tale follows the life of gentleman adventurer Gulliver along several ocean voyages, each of which ends in shipwreck. The first takes him to Lilliput, where he is much, much bigger than everyone else. He describes his nine months there as he quickly learns their language and ingratiates himself to the emperor. He returns home with adequate riches in the form of miniature livestock that he sells to finance the family he left behind.</p>
<p>Soon after, he is on a boat again, stranding himself somewhere in the Pacific, on a large heretofore undiscovered continent in the Pacific Ocean called Brobdignag. On this continent, the residents are as much bigger than he as he was bigger than the Lilliputians. He tells of his rather mundane adventures there, but be assured that here, too, he befriends royalty and plants himself firmly at the top of the Brobdingnagian food-chain. He is swept off this continent by circumstance (and a bird) and is once again rescued on the open ocean.</p>
<p>This most unfortunate of sailors is somehow taken up on another crew. This ship is attacked by pirates and Gulliver is stranded near idea. He is picked up by the flying island of Laputa, which is composed nearly entirely of adamant and has an adamant mechanism to guide its motion. After spending some time among the royalty there, he becomes bored and wants to visit the lands below, named Balnibarbi. Again, Gulliver is feted by all and invited everywhere important. In the great university of Lagado he finds the reason the country is so dilapidated: the entirety of the people&rsquo;s efforts have been perverted into non-rational and non-scientific pursuits that have no hope of accomplishing anything useful. There are only a few holdouts, whose homes and lands look normal and seem productive to Gulliver. A final side trip to Glubbdubdrib has him communing with the ghosts of all of the celebrities of the ages, thanks to the help of a great sorcerer. Gulliver again benefits from tremendous powers without any reason as to why he is singled out for the privilege.</p>
<p>After once again returning home to his wife and children—who must be teenagers by now—he cannot stay put and takes advantage of an offer to captain his own vessel. This is a capital idea if you want to commit insurance fraud, as the vessel is almost certain to capsize or otherwise fail to reach its destination with Gulliver aboard. It turns out that, this time, Gulliver&rsquo;s crew is less than honorable and they hire criminals to replace expired members until he has no more control and they trap him in his cabin. After weeks, they resolve to rid themselves of him in a small dinghy. He of course fetches up on yet another previously undiscovered land, this one populated by Yahoos and Houyhnhnms. The Yahoos are life extremely vile humans with no civilizing characteristics. The Houyhnhnms are horses with pure rationality and no strife and perfect in every way. Gulliver, of course, lives with the Houyhnhnms, even though he looks just like a Yahoo, which they keep as work animals. He spends years with them, learning their language and their ways and resolving to never return to the debased culture whence he came. Alas, the Houyhnhnms decide to get rid of him because they cannot abide a Yahoo in their midst. He builds himself a canoe and—lo and behold—is rescued by a Portuguese ship. He is of two minds: he wants to be rescued, but he doesn&rsquo;t want to spend any time in the company of Yahoos. He doesn&rsquo;t even want to return to civilization, really. He abhors everything about his own kind and can no longer abide even the smell of them. This applies even to his family once he is returned to England, where he lives out the rest of his days as a recluse, unable to reintegrate with the Yahoos.</p>
<p>I&rsquo;ve included <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3259">notes, citations and errata</a> in a separate post.</p>
</div></dd>
<dt class="field">Blockade Billy (2010)</dt>
<dd><div class=" "><p>by <em>Stephen King</em></p>
<p>This is a novella of just over 100 pages, so it&rsquo;s a short story by King&rsquo;s standards. It tells the story of 1950s major-league baseball, of the New Jersey Titans during one particular season when they needed a new catcher. These were the days when being a ball-player was just a job, not a chance at everlasting fame and wealth. With their starting catcher in jail and their backup injured beyond repair, the Titans found Billy Blakely. He&rsquo;s quiet, talks to himself, repeats what others say and seems a bit…off. But he can catch, he gets along well with the prima-donna pitcher and he hits a <em>lot</em> better than expected. The story is told from the point of view of &ldquo;Granny&rdquo;, the manager of the Titans at the time. Granny is now in a home, bored out of his mind, and only to happy to tell this story, with its sad and bizarre ending, to a &ldquo;Mr. King&rdquo;.</p>
</div></dd>
<dt class="field">Oblivion: Stories (2005)</dt>
<dd><div class=" "><p>by <em>David Foster Wallace</em></p>
<p>This is a collection of short stories about various topics. Wallace&rsquo;s strength is in his exquisitely detailed and precise prose. He tells his stories through the subconscious ramblings of his characters, over interwoven and using tens of pages to describe a split second. Two of the stories are almost novellas; others are very, very short. Many of them have the feel of books that he started and never quite finished. There&rsquo;s also almost always that vague feeling of self-psychoanalysis, with characters exhibiting and working their way through insecurities that Wallace himself was known to have.</p>
<p>The details of the stories are almost always vaguely bizarre: one unnamed and un-narrated character climbs a building in a blow-up advertising suit (<em>Mister Squishy</em>), in another a thread of thought about the litigation associated with his (formerly) secret black-widow farm haunts a man whose mother&rsquo;s botched plastic surgery makes her look constantly surprised, another is a school-hostage situation, as told by a daydreamer who nearly missed the whole thing but can recount the nano-details of daydream in a way that nearly supplants the &ldquo;main&rdquo; thread, another is the story of a man in psychoanalysis who reveals onion-skinned lies to eventually admit why he killed himself in a violent car accident, there is the man who is convinced he doesn&rsquo;t snore, the harpy to whom he&rsquo;s married who is convinced that he does, but both suffer from rare and strange disorders that mean they&rsquo;re both right and wrong and, finally, there&rsquo;s the final story, which is again set in the (at least semi-) bureaucratic world of advertising and market-analysis, which feels like a run at a chapter out of <em>Infinite Jest</em>.</p>
<p>The first story did as well, and made me want to read <em>The Pale King</em>, although I&rsquo;d heard that that work was unfinished. Although dissatisfying in the sense that the narrative loop isn&rsquo;t closed, even an unfinished David Foster Wallace story is a breathtaking jewel. [1]</p>
<p>I&rsquo;ve included <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3280">notes, citations and errata</a> in a separate post.</p>
</div></dd>
<dt class="field">The Psychopath Test (2011)</dt>
<dd><div class=" "><p>by <em>Jon Ronson</em></p>
<p>Jon Ronson is a journalist with an eccentric beat. He seems to cover what takes his fancy and his fancy often turns to the oddest—though at least somewhat successful—members of society. In this one, he delves into the business of psychology and the nature of psychopaths.</p>
<p>He interviews various people who could be considered psychopaths, wonders whether he himself is one, takes a course with Bob Hare—world-famous as the inventor of the original psychopath checklist—to find out how to track and evaluate more professionally, then discovers that the power has gone to his head and perhaps psychopaths aren&rsquo;t another species entirely—or near-to—and there is a bandwidth of human behavior, some of which falls within norms and other that doesn&rsquo;t.</p>
<p>There are also big players involved in making sure that people think they&rsquo;re sick. Society wants to benefit from the best minds, but also doesn&rsquo;t want to be changed too much by them. It is often difficult to tell the difference between a purported psychopath and a very intellectually engaged person. Ronson realizes that the checklist approach often just takes the human element out of evaluation and ends up making bad things happen to otherwise normal people—or at least people who aren&rsquo;t a danger to anyone.</p>
<p>At the end, he addresses the medical/psychiatric/pharmaceutical industry as a whole, seeing it for the capitalist engine of self-realization that it is. The engine gets people to participate because they&rsquo;re concerned about their mental well-being, but the engine is only concerned about selling unneeded medicines and making a profit.</p>
<p>I&rsquo;ve included <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3281">notes, citations and errata</a> in a separate post.</p>
</div></dd>
<dt class="field">Finders, Keepers (2015)</dt>
<dd><div class=" "><p>by <em>Stephen King</em></p>
<p>This is the sequel to Mr. Mercedes, reuniting the trio of detectives that formed at the end of that book: Holly, Jerome and Bill Hodges. They are a fun team to watch, typically interesting King characters. The story is good but feels a bit too well-oiled, especially if you’ve read a lot of Stephen King books. You know where it’s going and how it’s going to end. The bits of foreshadowing with Brady are eerie and quite well-done—much more like his best of old.</p>
<p>This story follows (yet another) avid fan (Morris) of a noir-mystery writer (think Roth and Updike with a bit of the reclusive Salinger) who feels betrayed by how his hero’s character was made to end. He’s such an avid fan that he breaks into the writer’s home with two cohorts in order to rob him of supposedly large amounts of cash. He discovers a final novel with his hero in it, unpublished for decades. Enraged, he kills the writer for the multiple betrayals of this fictional hero, getting away with the crime and stashing the novel away where he can read it in peace. Before he can read a single page, though, he goes on a bender and rapes a girl. He is caught and sentenced to decades in prison.</p>
<p>Fast-forward twenty years (or so) and Pete, a young guy in his last year of high school, discovers the book hidden in a trunk. He, too, is an avid fan of the writer and immediately recognizes the book for what it is. He also makes good use of the money stashed with the book to anonymously get his family through tough times. As you would expect, Morris is eventually paroled and comes looking for his book and his money, both of which are gone. He quickly ascertains what happened and pursues Pete. The detective trio are hot on his trail, trying to save Pete and solve the mystery.</p>
<p>I&rsquo;ve included <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3290">notes, citations and errata</a> in a separate post.</p>
</div></dd>
<dt class="field">We (1921)</dt>
<dd><div class=" "><p>by <em>Evgeny Zamyatin</em></p>
<p>How do I even begin to describe a novel of this breadth and imagination and density of idea and thought? Zamyatin packed in seemingly every single concept he could think of, presaging many other novelists who would come after, not least of whom are Orwell, Huxley, Dick and more. As with those other authors, his novel is set in a dystopian future, in a glass city completely shut off from nature and the non-calculable, the non-rational, the unpredictable, from anything that is not 100% statistically predictable. The lives of the citizens of this city run like clockwork, with no deviations allowed or—for the most part—even attempted.</p>
<p>Each person is assigned a letter and a number, the letter in some ways emotionally evocative of the kind of person, but only in an abstract way. The writing style is at-times florid and descriptive and sumptuous and rich—nearly every paragraph bears re-reading, nearly every sentence feels hand-crafted to contribute to the overarching concept of the book in myriad ways, from the spelling of words to multi-layered allusions to mixing in of wordplay in English and other languages. The translation is, I feel, quite sublime.</p>
<p>We follow the life of D-503, the main designer of the <em>Integral</em>, a majestic spaceship being built to seek the stars after 1000 years of the founding of the One State. We follow his turning from a cog in the machine to a rebel by I-330 and his subsequent falling in love with both her and O-90. As in novels that would follow—like <em>1984</em>—he walks the path to revolution and is then pulled back by the One State through surgery (essentially lobotomy of emotion and imagination). Despite his subjugation, damage is done to the One State and its glass-walled city, nature once again impinging on it, disrupting its clean rationality. The leaders of the revolution are captured and tortured but do not relent, even in death. The revolution will continue, somehow.</p>
<p>I&rsquo;ve included <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3294">notes, citations and errata</a> in a separate post.</p>
</div></dd>
<dt class="field">Definitely Maybe (1977; 1978 in English)</dt>
<dd><div class=" "><p>by <em>Arkady and Boris Strugatsky</em></p>
<p>This is the story of a physics researcher, toiling alone on a problem, on the edge of a great discovery. The closer he gets to breaking through, to culminating his research, the more the universe seems to resist him. Distracting visitors drop by, his neighbor turns out to be much more than he&rsquo;d appeared, then is murdered. The murder suspect is the researcher himself, with more visitors dropping in to threaten and cajole. He meets other researchers who, as they swap stories, all realize that they&rsquo;ve been similarly stymied, that they each were gently nudged from their goal by an invisible and inexorable impasse.</p>
<p>In a vein similar to how capital-T Time resists change in <em>11/22/63</em>, Stephen King&rsquo;s novel about the Kennedy assassination, here it is the capital-U Universe that resists the plumbing of its deepest workings. They discover that its possible that the Universe tries to preserve a homeostatic balance between entropy and reasoning ability—not actively, but by a principle similar to Heisenberg&rsquo;s about position and momentum. The cabal of scientists try to wrap their head around this concept and try to work out how they could even possibly continue to research it—or even harness it—if it is true. Because if it&rsquo;s true, then it means that the Universe will resist investigation into proving this principle, by definition.</p>
<p>I&rsquo;ve included <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3293">notes, citations and errata</a> in a separate post.</p>
</div></dd>
<dt class="field">The Hippopotamus: A Novel (1994)</dt>
<dd><div class=" "><p>by <em>Stephen Fry</em></p>
<p>Edward is the &ldquo;Hippo&rdquo; and the star of this novel, so-called because of the combination of his girth and his penchant for long baths. He is a one-time up-and-coming poet reduced to a theater critic by waning talent, insufficient gumption and a teensy problem with alcohol. He is swept up in the affairs of his rich-and-famous family when they variously ask him to help discover the secret behind the seeming miraculous workings of his godson. He goes to the stately manor of his old friend, the child&rsquo;s father and proceeds to surreptitiously investigate the matter, collecting information and impressions from the various other hangers-on. He slowly forms a theory, dispensing disputable wisdom and folly all the while, until the story culminates—as you would expect—in a revelatory conclusion at a large dinner party, in which the Hippo explains all and solves the mystery.</p>
<p>I&rsquo;ve included <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3295">notes, citations and errata</a> in a separate post.</p>
</div></dd>
<dt class="field">Making History (1997)</dt>
<dd><div class=" "><p>by <em>Stephen Fry</em></p>
<p>This is the story of Michael Young, a doctoral student who is on the verge of delivering his oral presentation of an obscure bit of history involving Adolf Hitler and his mother. Through a series of coincidences, he meets Leo Zuckerman, a physicist who has invented a machine that can look back in time. Together, with a shared interest and passion for the era of the rise of Hitler, they set about modifying the machine to enable them to not only look but to make slight changes. The slight change they make is to pollute the water supply of Brunau (the town in which Hitler was born) with an experimental male contraceptive, preventing Hitler&rsquo;s birth.</p>
<p>Part two begins with Michael awakening not in England but in Princeton in America in an alternate future engendered by his and Leo&rsquo;s meddling. The alternate history is one even worse than the one with Hitler in it, a world dominated by a charming, brilliant anti-Semitic polyglot who not only survives WWII but leads Germany and his Nazi party to victory over the world.  He exterminates all Jews using the Brunau water to sterilize the lot of them.</p>
<p>Michael is horrified and endeavors to locate Leo, who is also wracked with guilt and has, once again, developed a Temporal Imager. They once again modify the machine and concoct a plan to poison the Brunau water with a dead rat, preventing anyone from drinking the water and therefore the contraceptive in it. The timeline is restored, with Michael waking to a more familiar reality, albeit it with some slight changes again.</p>
<p>I&rsquo;ve included <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3296">notes, citations and errata</a> in a separate post.</p>
</div></dd>
<dt class="field">Revenge: A Novel (2003)</dt>
<dd><div class=" "><p>by <em>Stephen Fry</em></p>
<p><small class="notes">This book is also known as <em>The Stars’ Tennis Balls</em>, which is why this book was so familiar to me, but I couldn’t quite place why. I’d <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/news/view_article.php?id=2459">read it before but under the other title</a>.</small></p>
<p>This is a modern re-telling of Dumas&rsquo;s <em>Count of Monte Christo</em>, with Edward &ldquo;Ned&rdquo; Maddstone playing the main role. He is a good-looking, sporty, averagely intelligent and socially well-placed young man to whom everything has always come easily because no obstacles have ever been allowed to remain in his way. He is blissfully unaware of how good he has it. He has a lovely, lovely girlfriend. He has some friends, all of whom hate him very much, for various reasons.</p>
<p>These friends conspire to get him arrested, but a bad coincidence leads him into the hands of a secret service with every reason to eliminate him, as well. So, what starts off as an evil schoolboy prank that would have resulted in real but limited prison time or at least parole, turns instead to permanent banishment to a remote island of political prisoners. Ned is, to say the least, utterly out of his depth and bewildered beyond knowing. Nothing in his life has prepared him for this challenge, as he&rsquo;s never had to surmount a real challenge himself.</p>
<p>At the island, he is psychologically re-programmed to believe that his previous life was a fiction produced by his madness. There he meets &ldquo;Babe&rdquo;, another prisoner, put there because he was nearly unbelievably dangerously talented and intelligent. He was a spy who&rsquo;d outlived his usefulness. Babe takes Ned under his wing and teaches him everything he knows over the next twenty years. Babe helps him remember his past and helps him decipher what happened to him.</p>
<p>Babe dies of a heart attack and Ned takes the opportunity to escape the island. Armed with Babes bank account and knowledge (not the least of nine languages), he builds a software empire as Simon Cotter and plans his complex and nefarious revenge on those who wronged him. The manner of this revenge is intricate and exquisitely detailed and deliciously just. He does not stumble or deviate from his path, although he loses everything he&rsquo;d perhaps hoped to gain, retreating to the island whence he came.</p>
<p>I&rsquo;ve included <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3297">notes, citations and errata</a> in a separate post.</p>
</div></dd>
<dt class="field">Numero Zero (2015)</dt>
<dd><div class=" "><p>by <em>Umberto Eco</em></p>
<p>As ever with Eco, this is not just a novel, but a meta-book about the making of a book detailing the inner workings and construction of a non-partisan newspaper that will tell the &ldquo;truth&rdquo;. The newspaper is the brainchild of an eccentric tycoon Commendator Vimercate, but the purpose is that just the idea of the newspaper is to serve as a lever on shadowy figures of power, who will allow him into their inner sanctum in exchange for his shutting it down. In effect, the newspaper will never be and the book documenting its rise as well, but it has to be seen to have real potentiality in order for its effect to be served. Convoluted as ever, Eco&rsquo;s prose and his ability to make this concept believable carry him a long way.</p>
<p>The story follows the tales of the various reporters from the various beats, going down the rabbit holes of one conspiracy after another (as usual for Eco, for whom the semiotics of conspiracy was a special passion). Though they should be telling the truth, the various journalists bandy about obviously fabricated stories that they purport get closer to the &ldquo;truth&rdquo; than true stories would. The main theory is proposed by Braggadocio (one of many puns) who doggedly pursues a story of Mussolini having survived the second World War and having pulled the levers of power long into the 1970s. As ever, there are enough bits of real history woven in so as to make it nearly impossible to tell what&rsquo;s true and false, as Eco was delighted to have it. See <em>Foucault&rsquo;s Pendulum</em> for an even more extravagant and interwoven and longer treatment of the same idea.</p>
<p>In the end, the main character Colonna has a book but no publisher and no interest because the newspaper about which he wrote never existed. Nor could he be sure to be able to use his story without attracting the attention of possibly existing shadowy forces that he fear might try to stop him. He takes his salary and slinks away.</p>
<p>I&rsquo;ve included <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3298">notes, citations and errata</a> in a separate post.</p>
</div></dd>
<dt class="field">The Cyberiad (1965; 1974 in English)</dt>
<dd><div class=" "><p>by <em>Stanislaw Lem</em></p>
<p>This is a collection of short stories qua science-fiction fairy tales about Trurl and Klapaucius, the &ldquo;constructors&rdquo;. They travel far and wide through the galaxy, meeting monarchs great and small, constructing wonderful robots and thinking machines and even clockwork facsimiles of entire universes.</p>
<p>Many of the stories elucidate physical principles in fantastical ways, like their &ldquo;demon of the second kind&rdquo; which is loosely related to Maxwell&rsquo;s Demon. Another story discusses dragons as quantum-like creatures whose probability of existence can be controlled technologically to make them appear where the possibility of their presence would otherwise be vanishingly small. Other stories explore the limits of human knowledge in philosophical ways, as expressed through nearly ludicrously advanced technology, some of which beggars belief. Their construction skills know seemingly no bounds. </p>
<p>We see them start off as bitter rivals and grow to grudging compatriots who even come to one another&rsquo;s rescue, when needed. At the beginning, they seem to be human, but hints dropped throughout the run of stories show them to be clockwork creations themselves.</p>
<p>I&rsquo;ve included <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3299">notes, citations and errata</a> in a separate post.</p>
</div></dd>
<dt class="field">The Stars My Destination (1957)</dt>
<dd><div class=" "><p>by <em>Alfred Bester</em></p>
<p>This is a classic, nearly <em>the original</em>, space opera, which, like <em>We</em> above, packs nearly every concept into it that would be explored by other authors over the next decades. But Alfred Bester was there first. We follow the life of Gully Foyle, a low-level technician on a space-freighter plying its trade from the Inner Planets to the Outer Satellites. Think <em>The Expanse</em> and you&rsquo;ll be close enough. The economy of this construction is severely affected by the discovery of &ldquo;jaunting&rdquo; which is a sort of personal teleportation available only to the planet-bound.</p>
<p>Hi ship is attacked and the entire crew is left for dead. He survives for months until he is rescued/kidnapped by an asteroid cult that tattoos his face with a hideous tiger tattoo. Foyle is now driven purely by rage, with no allegiance to anyone but his ideation of revenge on the Presteign Corporation (think the globe-spanning corps of Gibson&rsquo;s works). Foyle is captured in his quest, tortured, does not break, is imprisoned where he can&rsquo;t jaunt, in a giant French subterranean fortress—evincing memories of Le Chateau D&rsquo;If from <em>The Count of Monte Christo</em>. He and a female companion are the first to break free, but he abandons her in their flight, choosing his quest for revenge above their love.</p>
<p>He makes it to the Outer Satellites where he reinvents himself as Geoffrey Fourmyle, an extremely rich and profligate trader who has had his tattoo mostly removed—it appears only when he loses control and his face reddens. He reestablishes contact with many of the elites who were at his throat before, but they don&rsquo;t recognize him, again inspiring echoes of Dumas-&rsquo;s <em>Monte Christo</em>. Many characters plot and scheme with and against each other, changing allegiances as they all try to get a super-weapon in Foumyle/Foyle&rsquo;s possession that would tip the balance of the coming open war between the Inner Planets and the Outer Satellites.</p>
<p>Fourmyle is trapped and captured but jaunts—<em>space</em>-jaunts, something heretofore thought impossible—to save himself, through sheer, desperate force of will. He discovers that he was able to do this before, when he saved himself at the beginning of the story, and we discover that the odd manifestations strewn throughout the book were also instantiations of him jaunting not just through space but through <em>time</em> folding part of the story Möbius-like, back upon itself. The book ends with Gully in sole possession of this powerful talent, on the verge of either revealing its secret to humanity so that it can conquer the stars or of building a cult of self based on it.</p>
<p>This is truly a foundational book in the sci-fi pantheon. I&rsquo;m really glad I finally got around to reading it.</p>
</div></dd>
<dt class="field">Das Letzte Theorem (2008) (de)</dt>
<dd><div class=" "><p>by <em>Arthur C. Clarke &amp; Frederik Pohl</em></p>
<p>I picked this up because of Clarke. This is the book he was working on shortly before he died. It&rsquo;s a mess. It&rsquo;s a barely science fiction. It&rsquo;s a mishmash of about 2/3 biography about a vain, entitled young man from Sri Lanka named Ranjit Subramanian.</p>
<p>He&rsquo;s a brilliant autodidact mathematician to whom nothing bad ever happens. Except when he&rsquo;s kidnapped by pirates and held in captivity and tortured for years, but he turns that frown upside-down by discovering Fermat&rsquo;s original solution to his own Theorem <em>in his head</em>. Rich people befriend him and give him money, a place to stay in their palaces. The prettiest, smartest girl in Sri Lanka marries him and gives up her career in AI to have his babies.</p>
<p>His best friend is an even bigger asshole, who rides the nepotism express to a powerful position in a self-elected, benign world government that rules via EMP technology that no-one else can discover. Happily, by the end of the book, China and Russia succumb to internal strife and the U.S. can reign as the sole remaining superpower.</p>
<p>Does Ranjit&rsquo;s having found a better solution to Fermat&rsquo;s theorem matter to the plot at all? No, it does not. Is everything absolutely perfect for this family, all the time, no matter what? Yes, yes it is. Is this unbelievably boring and does it feel like reading the fairy tale of a child? Yes. I used to blame the sappy bullshit, personal storylines of Stephen Baxter/Arthur Clarke collaborations on Baxter, but it&rsquo;s now perfectly clear that this tripe stemmed from Clarke.</p>
<p>There is no narrative tension at all. Everything is black and white. All main characters are rich and powerful and infallible. Ranjit&rsquo;s success is an utter mystery. It&rsquo;s not clear what his skills are or why he keeps getting offered jobs of such high caliber. The book is rapidly coming to a close and the mental deficits of his son seem to be leading absolutely nowhere. His daughter is a perfect goddess. There are Olympics on the Moon. His daughter, of course, wins. Everyone in the book is well-off or filthy rich. </p>
<p>No-one suffers. Except for a whole family whom Ranjit befriended and who died on a pirate ship—in what seems like a wholly separate (and equally boring) novella. Of the children we&rsquo;ve never heard anything again. Why was Ranjit imprisoned? Why was he not allowed to speak of his imprisonment? All plot lines hinted at and not pursued. Why is Gamini so revered and so successful? No idea. Nepotism? This is tripe. Why do we keep hearing about Myra&rsquo;s trying to stay current in her research into AIs? Oh, because in the last 15 pages, she&rsquo;s uploaded into a computer—and everybody&rsquo;s totally cool with that. Ranjit, in fact, doesn&rsquo;t seem fazed in the least.</p>
<p>Holy crap, this is tripe. It gets worse. We fast-forward 13,000 years. Ranjit has survived in cyberspace and humanity has excelled to such a degree that the Grand Galactics retire and hand over the reins to the universe to humanity. The end.</p>
</div></dd>
<dt class="field">High-Rise: A Novel (1975)</dt>
<dd><div class=" "><p>by <em>J.G. Ballard</em></p>
<p>This is another of Ballard&rsquo;s novels that seems to rage against our technological society. In ways, it critiques the same facets of modern, western life as Heller&rsquo;s <em>Something Happened</em>, which also finds nothing to love about modern society or the humans that people large swaths of it. The book documents the potential effects of living in a self-contained vertical village.</p>
<p>The story follows the life of a doctor Laing who, rather than setting up private practice, teaches at a local medical school. In this we already see his satisfaction with middling success rather than a stretching for limits. He is recently divorced, but not unhappily.</p>
<p>He is one of the first tenants of a gigantic new high-rise building, with 50 floors. He quickly begins to enjoy life in the building, leaving only for work. Things go sideways relatively quickly, with almost all residents avoiding outside contact, preferring to stay in the building, associating only with &ldquo;their kind&rdquo;. Their kind being people who live in what they consider to be an acceptable striation of the building&rsquo;s floors.</p>
<p>The residents all drink quite a lot, fool around quite a lot and grow increasingly violent and confrontational. Allegiances change, tribes form and split and re-form. They adopt their own signals and tags and signs and language. Elevators and power break down, water is sporadic, toilets block up, food is scarce. The upper floors fare better than the lower. It doesn&rsquo;t occur to anyone to leave. Not just the building&rsquo;s halls and lobbies and apartments, but also the parking lot is littered with garbage and half-destroyed cars.</p>
<p>The story culminates in the triumph of a group of women over architect and self-crowned &ldquo;king&rdquo; of the building, Anthony Royal, as well as Richard Wilder, a burly ex-rugby player who fancied himself a believable pretender to the throne. All the while, Laing looks on and is satisfied with a kingdom over a tribe of two women further down the building.</p>
<p>The descriptions of destruction and degradation of societal norms invite comparisons to <em>Hard to Be a God</em>, <em>Blindness</em> and <em>Lord of the Flies</em>.</p>
<p>I&rsquo;ve included <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3307">notes, citations and errata</a> in a separate post.</p>
</div></dd>
<dt class="field">One Human Minute (1971–1986)</dt>
<dd><div class=" "><p>by <em>Stanislaw Lem</em></p>
<p>This is a short book containing three stories.</p>
<p>The first is a fake review of a non-existent book called <em>One Human Minute</em>. The book purports to give an impression of what occurs on Earth each minute by compiling meticulous statistics about every conceivable facet of human life. E.g. the number of deaths of various kinds, the number of births, copulations, illnesses, etc. He actually reviews several editions of this book, each of which extends the concept of the original.</p>
<p>The second is a foretelling of the development of 21st-century weapons, told as a history. This sounds contradictory, but actually works quite well. His idea is that the battlefield will be increasingly automated and miniaturized until the &ldquo;war&rdquo; moves entirely out of human hands and into the purely virtual. He&rsquo;s not far wrong, actually, so far. All signs point to his predictions coming true.</p>
<p>The third is an interesting foray into cosmology, a discussion of how much luck had to do with the formation of life on Earth and the possible answers this provides to Fermi&rsquo;s purported paradox. The notion of how the inexorable rotation of the galactic spiral arms were timed perfectly with the cycles of life on Earth is a tempting explanation and entirely plausible, at least the way he presents it as a &ldquo;fake&rdquo; scientist.</p>
<p>All three books were, as ever with Lem, very interesting and engaging and well-worth reading. He&rsquo;s never predictable.</p>
<p>I&rsquo;ve included <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3309">notes, citations and errata</a> in a separate post.</p>
</div></dd>
<dt class="field">Something Happened (1974)</dt>
<dd><div class=" "><p>by <em>Joseph Heller</em></p>
<p>This is a sad book about a sad man named Slocum, adrift in a life he&rsquo;s sure he doesn&rsquo;t feel is worth living. He works for a large corporation, he has a five-person family. He seems to be quite comfortable. He is well-taken-care-of by his company. He does not seem to do anything for them, but he claims that he does it well and that his work is appreciated, that he excels among his peers. He drinks, he cheats, he lies. He is not special. He is not good. He is not especially bad.</p>
<p>The story is told largely as an inner monologue from Slocum&rsquo;s perspective. The first long section discusses his work life and the people there, with flashbacks to his first job—and his first flirtations and experiences with women. The second section focuses on his miserable and pointless home life, with a focus on his terrible, unsatisfying relationship with an ungrateful and difficult daughter. His &ldquo;retarded&rdquo; son is casually mentioned and discarded in the same thought, without any particular guilt on his part. Slocum seems to be more proud of his inability to lie to himself than ashamed of how he is as a person.</p>
<p>The plot doesn&rsquo;t really go anywhere. Instead, it bounces from one topic to another, but always the same ones, the ones that engross Slocum, that have formed him as a person. There&rsquo;s Virginia, the slutty 21-year–old he flirted heavily with at his first job (he was 17½) but with whom he never closed the deal. When he got back from the war, she&rsquo;d killed herself (gas in a stove). There&rsquo;s the young Jane at the office, whom he half-heartedly tries to bed, knowing she&rsquo;s too young for him. There&rsquo;s his son Derek, but he never dwells there long. He thinks about his wife a lot, and how much he likes to fuck her (his words). There&rsquo;s his mistress of ten years, Penny, who&rsquo;s the only one other than his wife who can satisfy him. There are the machinations at the office with Horace White and Black and Green and Brown and Phelps and hid terrible daughter and the drugs he thinks she&rsquo;s doing and how she wants to steal his car and his pathetic son who thinks he&rsquo;s tortured by everything and is more helpless than the retarded son and then there&rsquo;s the speech at the convention in Puerto Rice that he&rsquo;s never allowed to give. Everyone has a name but his nuclear-family members.</p>
<p>Slocum is mad, mentally unstable, driven around the bend by a country, a culture that is also mad. He cannot experience joy. He is honest with himself, brutally so. He is brutal with others. He does not let them know. He is the original American Psycho. He rambles, his internal monologues are heavily extemporaneous, tangential and parenthetical (sometimes a dozen pages or more).</p>
<p>I&rsquo;ve included <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3308">notes, citations and errata</a> in a separate post.</p>
</div></dd>
</dl><p><hr></p>
<div class="footnote-reference"><span id="footnote_DRAFTABLE_ENTRY_3209_1_body" class="footnote-number">[1]</span> As to Foster Wallace&rsquo;s style, your mileage may vary: I&rsquo;ve written the second paragraph in an approximation of his style. If that&rsquo;s already too much for you, then don&rsquo;t even bother picking up <em>Oblivion</em>.</div>      </div>
      </div>
        <div class="footer">
    <div class="footer-data"><div class="footer-links"><ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/contact.php" title="">Contact</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/support.php" title="">Support</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/privacy.php" title="">Privacy</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/rights.php" title="">Rights</a></li></ul></div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="copyright">Copyright (c) 1999-2026 earthli.com. All Rights Reserved.</div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="versions">Powered by <ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore/app_news.php">earthli News 3.7</a></li><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore" title="">earthli WebCore&trade; 3.7</a></li></ul></div></div>    </div>
      </div>
  </div>  </body>
</html>
]]>
  </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
      <title type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[Something Happened by Joseph Heller (1974) (read in 2016)]]>
  </title>
    <id>https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3308</id>
    <link href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3308"/>
    <updated>2016-12-31T06:28:14+01:00</updated>
    <author>
        <name type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[Marco von Ballmoos]]>
  </name>
      <uri>https://earthli.com/users/marco</uri>
    </author>
      <summary type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<blockquote class="quote abstract "><div>Disclaimer: these are notes I took while reading this book. They include citations I found interesting or enlightening or particularly well-written. In some cases, I&rsquo;ve pointed out which of these applies to which citation; in others, I have not. Any benefit you gain from reading these notes is... [<a class="complete-text-link" href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3308">More</a>]</div></blockquote>]]>
  </summary>
      <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<html lang="en">
  <head>
    <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/themes/ice.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/fonts/raleway.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/core/medium.css">
  </head>
  <body>
<div class="style-controls">  <div class="page">
    <div class="page-body">
<div class="info-box-top">
<p>
Published by <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_user.php?name=marco" title="Marco von Ballmoos" class="visible">marco</a> on <span class="date-time">31. Dec 2016 06:28:14 (GMT-5)</span>
</p>
</div>
      <div class="text-flow wide">
  <blockquote class="quote abstract "><div>Disclaimer: these are notes I took while reading this book. They include citations I found interesting or enlightening or particularly well-written. In some cases, I&rsquo;ve pointed out which of these applies to which citation; in others, I have not. Any benefit you gain from reading these notes is purely incidental to the purpose they serve of reminding me what I once read. Please see Wikipedia for a summary if I&rsquo;ve failed to provide one sufficient for your purposes. If my notes serve to trigger an interest in this book, then I&rsquo;m happy for you.</div></blockquote><p>This is a sad book about a sad man named Slocum, adrift in a life he&rsquo;s sure he doesn&rsquo;t feel is worth living. He works for a large corporation, he has a five-person family. He seems to be quite comfortable. He is well-taken-care-of by his company. He does not seem to do anything for them, but he claims that he does it well and that his work is appreciated, that he excels among his peers. He drinks, he cheats, he lies. He is not special. He is not good. He is not especially bad.</p>
<p>The story is told largely as an inner monologue (a highly parenthetical one) providing Slocum&rsquo;s perspective. The first long section discusses his work life and the people there, with flashbacks to his first job—and his first flirtations and experiences with women. The second section focuses on his miserable and pointless home life, with a focus on his terrible, unsatisfying relationship with an ungrateful and difficult daughter. His &ldquo;retarded&rdquo; son is casually mentioned and discarded in the same thought, without any particular guilt on his part. Slocum seems to be more proud of his inability to lie to himself than ashamed of how he is as a person.</p>
<p>The plot doesn&rsquo;t really go anywhere. Instead, it bounces from one topic to another, but always the same ones, the ones that engross Slocum, that have formed him as a person.</p>
<p>There&rsquo;s Virginia, the slutty 21-year–old he flirted heavily with at his first job (he was 17½) but with whom he never closed the deal. When he got back from the war, she&rsquo;d killed herself (gas in a stove). There&rsquo;s the young Jane at the office, whom he half-heartedly tries to bed, knowing she&rsquo;s too young for him. There&rsquo;s his retarded son Derek, but he never dwells there long. He thinks about his wife a lot, and how much he likes to fuck her (his words). There&rsquo;s his mistress of ten years, Penny, who&rsquo;s the only one other than his wife who can satisfy him. </p>
<p>There are the machinations at the office with Horace White and Black and Green and Brown and Red Phelps and Andy Kagle and Arthur Baron and Martha the crazy receptionist (and there&rsquo;s even a Gray, at the end) and his terrible daughter and the drugs he thinks she&rsquo;s doing and how she wants to steal his car and his pathetic son who thinks he&rsquo;s tortured by everything and is more helpless than the retarded son and then there&rsquo;s the speech at the convention in Puerto Rice that he&rsquo;s never allowed to give. Everyone has a name but his nuclear-family members.</p>
<p>Slocum is mad, mentally unstable, driven around the bend by a country, a culture that is also mad. He cannot experience joy. He is honest with himself, brutally so. He is brutal with others. He does not let them know. He is the original American Psycho. He rambles, his internal monologues are heavily extemporaneous, tangential and parenthetical (sometimes a dozen pages or more).</p>
<p>He has no empathy, thinking in calculation only, he feels no remorse, either in real life or in his imagined scenarios. He doesn&rsquo;t engage with life, he has no goals, other than the simplistic, barbaric set given him by his society, by his country. He reacts, he doesn&rsquo;t act. He has no imagination. There&rsquo;s plenty of blame to go around for his behavior, but a lot of it is on him. Life continues at work after his great tragedy/murder. (Don&rsquo;t mention that, too big a spoiler).</p>
<p>From <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/books/98/02/15/home/heller-something.html">The New York Times book Review</a> by <cite>Kurt Vonnegut, Jr.</cite> (<cite><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/">New York Times</a></cite>) called it <span class="quote-inline">&ldquo;one of the unhappiest books ever written&rdquo;</span>, which is as good and succinct a description as any.</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;We keep reading this overly long book, even though there is no rise and fall in passion and language, because it is structured as a suspense novel. The puzzle which seduces us is this one: Which of several possible tragedies will result from so much unhappiness? The author picks a good one.</p>
<p>&ldquo;I say that this is the most memorable, and therefore the most permanent variation on a familiar theme, in that it says baldly what the other variations only implied, what the other variations tried with desperate sentimentality not to imply: <strong>That many lives, judged by the standards of the people who live them, are simply not worth living.</strong> (Emphasis added.)&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote><h2>Citations</h2><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;And I wasn’t so sure even then that I liked my family well enough as a group to want them pressing upon&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 9</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;What would happen if, deliberately, calmly, with malice aforethought and obvious premeditation, I disobeyed? I know what would happen: nothing. Nothing would happen. And the knowledge depresses me. Some girl downstairs I never saw before (probably with a bad skin also) would simply touch a few keys on some kind of steel key punch that would set things right again, and it would be as though I had not disobeyed at all. My act of rebellion would be absorbed like rain on an ocean and leave no trace. I would not cause a ripple.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 19</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;I can no longer change my environment or even disturb it seriously. They would simply fire and forget me as soon as I tried. They would file me away. That’s what will happen to Martha the typist when she finally goes crazy. She’ll be fired and forgotten. She’ll be filed away. She’ll be given sick pay, vacation pay, and severance pay. She’ll be given money from the pension fund and money from the profit-sharing fund, and then all traces of her will be hidden safely out of sight inside some old green cabinet for dead records in another room on another floor or in a dusty warehouse somewhere that nobody visits more than once or twice a year and few people in the company even know exists;&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 19</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;People in the company like to live well and are unusually susceptible to nervous breakdowns. They have good tastes and enjoy high standards of living. We are well-educated and far above average in abilities and intelligence. Everybody spends. Nobody saves.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 21</div></div><p>This part reminds me a lot of David Foster Wallace&rsquo;s short story <em>Mister Squishy</em>, which he would write almost 50 years later.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;When salesmen are doing well, there is pressure upon them to begin doing better, for fear they may start doing worse. When they are doing poorly, they are doing terribly.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 26</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;am bored with my work very often now. Everything routine that comes in I pass along to somebody else. This makes my boredom worse. It’s a real problem to decide whether it’s more boring to do something boring than to pass along everything boring that comes in to somebody else and then have nothing to do at all.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 33</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;I frequently feel I’m being taken advantage of merely because I’m asked to do the work I’m paid to do.)&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 34</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;think an authentic miracle takes place in the universe every time I come awake again after going to sleep. What is happening to me when I am not conscious of myself? Where do I go? Where have I been? Who watches over me when I am gone to make sure I do get back?&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 170</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;A vacuum cleaner that works well is more important to me than the atom bomb, and it makes not the slightest difference to anyone I know that the earth revolves around the sun instead of vice versa, or the moon around the earth, although the measured ebb and flow of the tides may be of some interest to mariners and clam diggers, but who cares about them? Green is more important to me than God. So, for that matter, is Kagle and the man who handles my dry cleaning, and a transistor radio that is playing too loud is a larger catastrophe to me than the next Mexican earthquake.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 210</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;(more and more of us seem to be transferring our children into private schools, which are expensive and not much good, and then transferring them out again into other private schools that are not much better. We don’t like the heads of these private schools. More and more things seem to be slipping into a state of dissolution, and soon there will be nothing left. No more newspapers, magazines, or department stores. No more movie houses. Just discount stores and drugs. More and more of us, I think—not just me—really don’t care what happens to our children, as long as it doesn’t happen to them too soon)&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 224</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;I wonder what kind of person would come out if I ever did erase all my inhibitions at once, what kind of being is bottled up inside me now. Would I like him? I think not. There’s more than one of me, probably. There’s more than just an id; I know that; I could live with my id if I ever looked upon it whole, sort of snuggle up and get cozy with it, exchange smutty stories. Deep down inside, I might really be great. Deep down inside, I think not. I hope I never live to see the real me come out. He might say and do things that would embarrass me and plunge him into serious trouble, and I hope I am dead and buried by the time he does. Ha,&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 248</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;“Are you angry?” “Do I look it? No, of course not.” “Sometimes I can’t tell.” “Sure, you can. You keep telling me I yell all the time. No, I’m not angry. I want you to talk to me about the things you’re thinking about, especially the things you can’t figure out.” “Do you? I will.” “I do. Ask me anything.” “Do you fuck Mommy,” he asks. “You said I could,” he pleads hastily, as he sees me gape at him in surprise. “Yes, you can,” I answer. “Sometimes.” “Why?” “It feels good, that’s why. It’s kind of fun. Do you know what it means?” He shakes his head unsurely. “Is it all right for me to ask you?” “It’s all right to ask if I do. I think it would be better to ask someone else what it is. It would also be a little better if you used a different word.” “I don’t know a different word. Screw?” “That’s almost the same. You can use the word you want. It’s a little funny, though, to use it with me. Use it. I suppose it’s good enough.” “Are you angry with me?” “No. Why do you keep asking me that? Don’t you know when I’m angry or not?”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 275</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;“Are you angry?” “Do I look it? No, of course not.” “Sometimes I can’t tell.” “Sure, you can. You keep telling me I yell all the time. No, I’m not angry. I want you to talk to me about the things you’re thinking about, especially the things you can’t figure out.” “Do you? I will.” “I do. Ask me anything.” “Do you fuck Mommy,” he asks. “You said I could,” he pleads hastily, as he sees me gape at him in surprise. “Yes, you can,” I answer. “Sometimes.” “Why?” “It feels good, that’s why. It’s kind of fun. Do you know what it means?” He shakes his head unsurely. “Is it all right for me to ask you?” “It’s all right to ask if I do. I think it would be better to ask someone else what it is. It would also be a little better if you used a different word.” “I don’t know a different word. Screw?” “That’s almost the same. You can use the word you want. It’s a little funny, though, to use it with me. Use it. I suppose it’s good enough.” “Are you angry with me?” “No. Why do you keep asking me that? Don’t you know when I’m angry or not?” “Not all the time.” “I thought I yelled so much.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 275</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;don’t like Derek,” he remarks without pause. He wears a troubled, injured look. “You’re not supposed to say that,” I instruct him mildly. “You’re not supposed to feel that way, either.” “Do you?” “You’re not supposed to ask that.” “You just told me I could ask you anything. That’s another thing I always think about.” “Yes. You can. It was okay for you to say what you did and ask me. And it was also okay for me to answer you the way I did. It was all right for both of us. Can you understand that? I hope that’s not too confusing for you. I’m not trying to duck out on the question.” “Am I supposed to say it or not? I don’t know.” “I don’t know,” I admit resignedly. “I’m not sure I like Derek, either, the situation I mean, the way he is, maybe even him too. I’m not sure. But we often have to live with things we don’t like. Like my job. Me too. I don’t know what to do about him yet. And nobody can help me.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 276</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;With my wife by now, I think it no longer matters very much either way to either one of us whether I make her happy or unhappy; the difference is not so great nor the effect lasting; by now, I think we have learned how to get through the rest of our lives with each other and are both already more than halfway there.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 285</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Lying awake listening for noises, he would hear the same creaks and footfalls we all do; but he would imagine human beings coming to get him, scaling stone by stone the outside wall of our apartment building, boring downward from the roof toward his bedroom, descending from an opening in the sky to the sill of his fragile glass window. Their faces were hooded or shaped in shadows they carried with them like shawls.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 292</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;I think he believes me now, more readily than he used to, I think he feels a little bit more at home with us, I think he trusts me more. (At least he knows now that I am me, although neither one of us is all that positive who that me we know I am is.)&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 293</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;If I were poor, I believe I might want to overthrow the government by force. I’m very glad, however, that everyone poor isn’t trying to overthrow the government, because I’m not poor. I don’t know why every Negro maid doesn’t steal from her white employer (but I’m glad our Negro maid doesn’t, or at least has not let us find out she does). If I were Black and poor, I don’t think I’d have any reason for obeying any law other than the risk of being caught. As it is, though, I’m glad colored people do obey the law (most of them, anyway), because I am afraid of Negroes and have moved away from them. I am afraid of cops. But I’m glad there are cops and wish there were more. (I don’t like cops.) (Except when they’re around to protect me.)&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 306</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;used to want to rumple my daughter’s hair too, pat her head affectionately or touch or kiss her cheek or throw a hugging arm around her shoulders, but she began to shrink away from me as she grew up, kidding at first, I thought, and I would always pretend to be hurt. And then those times came when I began to comprehend that she was no longer kidding, and I no longer had to pretend I was really hurt. I really was hurt—and now I pretend I am not.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 308</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;It’s so much sweeter when you’re young, so much hotter, so much more fun. I wish I had that frenetic heat back now instead of this sluggish, processed lust I put myself through and frequently have to make a laborious effort to enjoy.)&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 313</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;So much of misfortune seems a matter of timing. We were late coming for him that day, and we saw him, half a block from the play area, standing alone on the sidewalk in his bare feet and bawling loudly, helplessly, because he thought we were never going to come for him at all. (I was incensed when I saw him. We were simply late. Nothing else had happened.) Other people, children and grown-ups, looked at my boy curiously as they walked past and saw him standing there crying: none of them offered to help, none of them questioned him. (Good God—even I will help a small child who seems to be in trouble, if no one else does.) He did nothing when he saw us, except shriek more piercingly, quail more frantically, in a tortured plea for us to rescue him from whatever odd spell was holding him to that spot in terror. (I was so deeply incensed with him for a moment that I was actually tempted to stop with a sneer and delay going to him.) He was convulsed with grief by the idea that we had abandoned him, just because we were a little bit late, that we had left him there purposely because we were dissatisfied and disgusted with him, and that he was never going to see us again or have anyone to take care of him.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 318</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;We found him standing by himself along the shore about two hundred yards away, floundering in one spot as though lost: he was not certain if he had overshot us already, and he did not know, therefore, in which direction to proceed. His cheeks were white, his eyes were distant, and his jaws were clamped shut. The tendons in his neck were taut, and he had a lump in his throat. The landmarks along the boardwalk—all those familiar signs and structures—meant nothing to him. My first impulse was to kill him. “Were you lost?” I shouted to him. “I don’t know.” He shrugged. I wanted to kill him. I was enraged and disgusted with him for his helplessness and incompetence (standing there like that on the sidewalk in town that day as&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 336</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The company is still there. (She isn’t.) It hasn’t grown. Nobody ever hears of it. And life has pretty much been one damned sterile office desk after another for me ever since, apart from those few good years I spent away from home in the army.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 362</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;There’s nobody else whose leg I want to kick except my daughter&rsquo;s ankle at the dinner table at times when it would be easier for me to do that than reach out to smack her in the face. She flinches as though I already have as soon as I feel I want to and raise my voice. My wife makes me want to hurl her back a foot or two to give me room to cock my arm and punch her in the jaw at least twice with my fist. I shake my finger at my boy. Derek I smother with a huge hand over his mouth to stifle his inarticulate noises and hide his driveling eyes, nose, and mouth. (It is not to put him out of his misery that I do it; it is to put me out of mine.) He’s a poor, pathetic, handicapped little human being, but I must not think about him as much as I could if I let myself.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 392</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;It’s all Kagle’s fault, I feel by now: I blame him. Minute imperfections of his have become insufferable. Irritability sizzles inside me like electric shock waves, saws against the bones of my head like a serrated blade. I can quiver out of my skin, gag, get instant, knifing headaches from the way he sucks on a tooth, drums his fingers, mispronounces certain words, says byooteefool instead of byootafal and between you and I instead of between you and me, and laughs when I correct him—I have an impulse to correct him every single time and have to stifle it. The words spear through my consciousness and slam to a stop against bone, the inside of my skull. I can restrain myself from saying them, but I cannot suppress the need to want to. I am incensed with him for provoking it. He bubbles saliva in the corner of his mouth and still wears the white smudge on his chapped lips of whatever antacid pill or solution he has been taking for his stomach distress. “Heh-heh,” he has fallen into the habit of saying, with lowered, escaping eyes. “Heh-heh,” I want to mock back. I loathe Andy Kagle now because he has failed. I’d like to hit him across the face with the heavy brass lamp on his desk. I tell him. “Andy,” I tell him, “I’d like to hit you across the face with that lamp.” “Heh-heh,” he says. “Heh-heh,” I reply.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 393</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;That was a man, that Franklin Delano Roosevelt, the last time I had a President I could look up to (the rest have not been mine), or maybe I only thought so because I was gullible. No—the whole country wept when he died. My mother wept. “One third of the nation,” said he, “is ill-housed, ill-clothed, and ill-fed.” By now, with our improved technology and humane social and political reforms, it must be more than half. When&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 397</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Horace White can go no further in the company because there is nothing more he can do than be Horace White. He can be named to prestigious government commissions that issue reports on matters of grave national importance that are methodically ignored.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 426</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The children sit as still as replicas in a store, hiding inside their own faces as they wait to see what will happen.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 467</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Dirty movies have gotten better, I’m told. Smut and weaponry are two areas in which we’ve improved. Everything else has gotten worse. The world is winding down. You can’t get good bread anymore even in good restaurants (you get commercial rolls), and there are fewer good restaurants. Melons don’t ripen, grapes are sour. They dump sugar into chocolate candy bars because sugar is cheaper than milk. Butter tastes like the printed paper it’s wrapped in. Whipped cream comes in aerosol bombs and isn’t whipped and isn’t cream. People serve it, people eat it. Two hundred and fifty million educated Americans will go to their graves and never know the difference.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 483</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;It tastes like shit. Nobody cares but me. From sea to shining sea the country is filling with slag, shale, and used-up automobile tires. The fruited plain is coated with insecticide and chemical fertilizers. Even pure horseshit is hard to come by these days. They add preservatives. You don’t find fish in lakes and rivers anymore. You have to catch them in cans. Towns die. Oil spills. Money talks. God listens. God is good, a real team player. “America the Beautiful” isn’t: it was all over the day the first white man set foot on the continent to live.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 483</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;(Last night, my wife had another one of her bad dreams. I didn’t wake her. Afterward, after all the smothered moaning and spastic shuddering, she began to snore lightly, and I did wake her, to tell her she was snoring and complain she was not letting me sleep. She apologized penitently in a drowsy, cranky voice and turned over on her side while I looked at her ass. I smiled and slept well.)&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 484</div></div><p>He&rsquo;s a monster.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The years are too short, the days are too long.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 489</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Someone like Amazonian Marie Jencks would have suctioned me right back up into the womb with a single siphoning contraction, and then puffed me out on a flat trajectory into the spongy, red catacombs of a testicle belonging to a man riding the subway trains in search of a curvy backside to splash me back out against. That’s what I call dismemberment. That’s regression. (It wasn’t so bad living in my old man’s scrotum, as far as I can recall. It was warm and humid, and there was lots of companionship. I had a ball.) (That was a good one.)&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 498</div></div><p>Now that&rsquo;s some stream-of-consciousness. In fact, a lot of his book takes place in parentheses…</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;I’m content with the boredom I have. (If I kill my wife, who will take care of the children? If I kill my children, my wife can take care of herself. A prudent family man must plan ahead toward possibilities like that in order to provide for his loved ones.) I almost wish my wife would go ahead and commit adultery already so I can get my divorce.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 508</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;I’m content with the boredom I have. (If I kill my wife, who will take care of the children? If I kill my children, my wife can take care of herself. A prudent family man must plan ahead toward possibilities like that in order to provide for his loved ones.) I almost wish my wife would go ahead and commit adultery already so I can get my divorce. (I’m not sure I can do it without her.)&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 508</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;It is so easy to make my wife happy it’s really a crime we don’t do it more often. (She’s even prettier when she’s feeling good, her face lights up. She doesn’t hide it.) I try. When I can. (It isn’t always easy to want to.) I’ll make the children come along with us to church when I go, and we’ll generally have a joyful time. (It isn’t always easy to want to be kind and make her happy when I’m thinking of death, murder, adultery, and divorce.)&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 509</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;I can’t always get a divorce. I don’t know how it’s done.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 518</div></div><p>He didn&rsquo;t know how to start with Virginia and doesn&rsquo;t know how to end with his wife.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;(Some nights I can sleep and she can’t: it registers upon me that she is leaving the bed repeatedly in some state of agitation, and I doze off again more blissfully as a result of this knowledge.)&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 523</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;She hasn’t asked in years. Age and self-respect, I think, have stilled the question every time she wanted to ask: “Do you still love me?” It is in her mind, though. I can see it as a verbal sculpture. She fishes, hints. I decline to oblige. Or perhaps she believes I don’t love her any longer and fears that if she were to ask: “Do you love me?” I would answer: “No.” And then we would have to do something. (And wouldn’t know what.)&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 524</div></div><p>He&rsquo;s so mean to her, enjoying her suffering. he lets her nightmare end before waking her.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;And I am so pleased she doesn’t ask, feel so grateful and deeply indebted to her at times, that I want to throw wide my arms in relief and proclaim: “I love you!”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 525</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;(I have sat at tables with men I’ve known a long time and have wanted to touch their hand.)&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 535</div></div><p>He also accuses his daughter of being gay. and his son. He is homophobic, too. He&rsquo;s the whole package.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;I think there’s a sauna, for many of the more affluent, better-bred occupants of my thoughts seem the type that likes to scorch itself leisurely after playing squash. I suspect there’s a homosexual haunt located somewhere secret. Tiny shops are all about at which wicked contraband is exchanged by grimy, unshaven men who know how. Grimy, unshaven men expose themselves to me and to children of both sexes and go unpunished. All crimes go unpunished&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 536</div></div><p>All of this goes on in his head.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;My memory does get faulty of late, merges indistinguishably with imagination, and I must make efforts to shake them apart.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 550</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;(Some tickle my fancy. Some do not.) The day before yesterday, I walked into a luncheonette for a rare roast beef sandwich on a seeded roll and thought I found my barber working behind the counter. “What are you doing in a luncheonette?” I asked. “I’m not your barber,” he answered. I was afraid I was losing my mind. A week ago I looked out a taxi window and saw Jack Green begging in the street in the rain, dressed in a long wet overcoat and ragged shoes. He was a head taller, thinner, pale, and gaunt. It wasn’t him. But that’s what I saw. I was afraid I was losing my wits.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 555</div></div><p>He seems to be unraveling.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;I’ll bet I’m probably one of the very few people in the entire world who know (not knows) that livid means blue and lurid means pale. A lot of good that knowledge has done me.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 560</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;“Daddy!” He is dying. A terror, a pallid, pathetic shock more dreadful than any I have ever been able to imagine, has leaped into his face I can’t stand it. He can’t stand it. He hugs me. He looks beggingly at me for help. His screams are piercing. I can’t bear to see him suffering such agony and fright. I have to do something. I hug his face deeper into the crook of my shoulder. I hug him tightly with both my arms. I squeeze. “Death,” says the doctor, “was due to asphyxiation. The boy was smothered. He had superficial lacerations of the scalp and face, a bruised hip, a deep cut on his arm. That was all. Even his spleen was intact.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 562</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;“Good-bye, Martha.” “Good-bye, Martha dear.” “Bye, bye, dear.” “Did you leave anything behind?” “Don’t worry, dear. We’ll send it along.” “Be gentle with her,” I adjure. “She’s a wonderful girl.” I hear applause when she’s gone for the way I handled it. No one was embarrassed. Everyone seems pleased with the way I’ve taken command.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 569</div></div>      </div>
      </div>
        <div class="footer">
    <div class="footer-data"><div class="footer-links"><ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/contact.php" title="">Contact</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/support.php" title="">Support</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/privacy.php" title="">Privacy</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/rights.php" title="">Rights</a></li></ul></div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="copyright">Copyright (c) 1999-2026 earthli.com. All Rights Reserved.</div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="versions">Powered by <ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore/app_news.php">earthli News 3.7</a></li><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore" title="">earthli WebCore&trade; 3.7</a></li></ul></div></div>    </div>
      </div>
  </div>  </body>
</html>
]]>
  </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
      <title type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[Capsule Movie Reviews Vol.2016.12]]>
  </title>
    <id>https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3263</id>
    <link href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3263"/>
    <updated>2016-11-21T11:58:58+01:00</updated>
    <author>
        <name type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[Marco von Ballmoos]]>
  </name>
      <uri>https://earthli.com/users/marco</uri>
    </author>
      <summary type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<p><small class="notes">These are my notes to remember what I watched and kinda what I thought about it. I&rsquo;ve recently transferred my reviews to IMDb and made <a href="http://www.imdb.com/user/ur1323291/ratings">the list</a> of over 900 ratings publicly available. I&rsquo;ve included the individual ratings with my notes for each movie. These ratings are not absolutely comparable to... [<a class="complete-text-link" href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3263">More</a>]</small></p>
]]>
  </summary>
      <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<html lang="en">
  <head>
    <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/themes/ice.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/fonts/raleway.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/core/medium.css">
  </head>
  <body>
<div class="style-controls">  <div class="page">
    <div class="page-body">
<div class="info-box-top">
<p>
Published by <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_user.php?name=marco" title="Marco von Ballmoos" class="visible">marco</a> on <span class="date-time">21. Nov 2016 11:58:58 (GMT-5)</span>
</p>
<p>
Updated by <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_user.php?name=marco" title="Marco von Ballmoos" class="visible">marco</a> on <span class="date-time">23. Nov 2016 12:21:07 (GMT-5)</span>
</p>
</div>
      <div class="text-flow wide">
  <p><small class="notes">These are my notes to remember what I watched and kinda what I thought about it. I&rsquo;ve recently transferred my reviews to IMDb and made <a href="http://www.imdb.com/user/ur1323291/ratings">the list</a> of over 900 ratings publicly available. I&rsquo;ve included the individual ratings with my notes for each movie. These ratings are not absolutely comparable to each other—I rate the film on how well it suited me for the <em>genre</em> and my mood. YMMV.</small></p>
<dl><dt class="field">Krull (1983) — <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0085811/">5/10</a></dt>
<dd><div class=" "><p>I saw this movie for the first time over fifteen years ago. It&rsquo;s actually better than I remembered, but still not a spectacular movie. The sets are pretty nice and the production quality is good. It&rsquo;s got Liam Neeson in it and failed to be ruined by him—and that&rsquo;s not nothing.</p>
<p>We follow the story of two star-crossed lovers on a planet with medieval technology that is somehow also bound up in galactic struggle. Krull is the son of one of two monarchs who agree to bind their kingdoms through marriage. The &ldquo;Beast&rdquo;—an interstellar traveler with a ferocious army of &ldquo;Slavers&rdquo;—sends his troops to seize the bride for his own. Krull embarks on a mission with the &ldquo;Old One&rdquo; to find the &ldquo;glave&rdquo; (the five-pointed throwing disk) and get to the teleporting dark fortress where the Beast makes its home and where his bride-to-be is being held captive.</p>
<p>They encounter a band of robbers—among them is Neeson—that Krull convinces to join him in his quest. They have many predictable adventures, seeking one seer after another who can tell them how to find the dark fortress. The Beast sends minions and takes over bystanders to try to trick Krull into giving up his mission.</p>
<p>He doesn&rsquo;t though and uses the glave to great effectiveness as a sort of extragalactic sawzall to knock the beast down. Down but not out. It turns out that the real weapon he needs was <em>within him all along</em>. Actually, he needs his bride to give him the fire that he then prolifically fires form his hand to solve all of his remaining problems. A good thing, too, because, like, can you imagine if <em>she&rsquo;d</em> been the one to save everyone? Unthinkable.</p>
</div></dd>
<dt class="field">Airplane II: The Sequel (1982) — <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0083530/">6/10</a></dt>
<dd>Robert Hays is back as Striker and Julie Haggerty is Elaine as they crew a space shuttle bound for the moon. It&rsquo;s soon off course and headed for the sun. There are a shocking number of inside jokes (e.g. when Peter Graves—Captain Oveur—is trying to shut down the misbehaving computer, the <em>Mission Impossible</em> theme plays ominously). There are a bunch of inspired cameos and comic bits and parodies of countless films. I enjoyed it. Lloyd Bridges is brilliant, as are William Shatner and Rip Torn and Raymond Burr.</dd>
<dt class="field">A Good Day to Die Hard (2013) — <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1606378/">3/10</a></dt>
<dd>You know what? This movie fucking sucked. It&rsquo;s a travesty. It&rsquo;s a jingoistic mish-mash of action and endless, incoherent car chases and stupid arrogant Americans and hoo-rah violence celebration and ridiculous deus-ex-machina stashes of weapons and endless clips and stupid-not-cool smirking from Bruce Willis who is simultaneously sucking in his gut and fucking indestructible—even more so than his musclebound and sulky son—and cartoonish depictions of Russians as hapless lackeys to the combined might of two Americans—one of whom, we are nearly constantly reminded, is <span class="quote-inline">&ldquo;just on vacation&rdquo;</span>—and the cartoonishness doesn&rsquo;t stop just at the Russian culture but continues with an utterly ridiculous depiction of how nuclear weapons work. Ugh. It&rsquo;s too tiring to even list it all. Watch the first one or the second one or the third one—how can you go wrong with Jeremy Irons as an ethereally thin, ambiguously sexually oriented supervillain?—or even, God forbid, the fourth one, because at least there you get to watch Bruce Willis call Kevin Smith &ldquo;Dumptruck&rdquo;. Avoid number five at all costs. I avoided it for three years, but it came on just as I was laid low by a migraine and I was trapped like a spider in its stupid web.</dd>
<dt class="field">Deadpool (2016) — <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1431045/">8/10</a></dt>
<dd><div class=" "><p>Although the film self-referentially pokes fun at itself for even pretending to be a date movie, it really is the story of a young man and woman who fall in love only to have their paradise darkened by the cloud of an extremely aggressive cancer, the cure for which so horribly disfigures him that he decides not to return to her, letting her think him dead instead. The movie is the story of how he eventually does get the courage to return to her, only to realize that the only real problem he had was that he didn&rsquo;t trust her to be big-hearted enough to see past his once-handsome-and-now-gruesome visage to the man beneath. He didn&rsquo;t give her enough credit for having fallen in love with the man within rather than the stud-muffin without. So romantic, date-night fare, right?</p>
<p>There&rsquo;s also a tremendous amount of violence—not necessarily gratuitous, but over-the-top choreographed, at any rate—a fuck-ton of swearing, some nudity (Ryan Reynolds&rsquo;s booty, ladies and germs) and seriously adult themes. The story is also told in a series of looping flashbacks over the course of two years with a lot of asides that break the fourth wall (as in the comic books, actually). It&rsquo;s a well-paced film. I liked how the taxi driver who takes Deadpool to the scenes of battle was a main character, I liked how we were introduced to two minor X-Men characters. I liked how they showed Wade and Vanessa&rsquo;s relationship develop as a shared experience, rather than the classic trope of making the woman try to rescue the man from himself, because he&rsquo;s obviously damaged. They were both damaged, but in the same way, so it worked for them. [1]</p>
<p>It took me a while to get used to Ajax&rsquo;s and Angel&rsquo;s powers because they were both just as indestructible and impervious to pain as DeadPool and Colossus. But that&rsquo;s how superhero movies are, that&rsquo;s how these battles have always been, drawn-out like professional wrestling matches, with the bad guy always <em>almost</em> but not quite turning the odds before the &ldquo;hero&rdquo; triumphs. The hero in this case is Deadpool and he goes against the trope by making <em>damned</em> sure that Ajax isn&rsquo;t coming back. [2]</p>
<p>Ryan Reynolds carries the film well and T.J. Miller as the bartender at his favorite bar/hangout was the only other actor I recognized. I only realized that Ajax&rsquo;s smirking face belonged to the same actor who&rsquo;d first played Daario Neharis in <em>Game of Thrones</em>.</p>
</div></dd>
<dt class="field">Daredevil S02 (2016) — <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt3322312/">9/10</a></dt>
<dd><div class=" "><p>This season centers on the Punisher, weaving in the Yakuza, the Hand, Wilson Fisk (still in prison) as well as Elektra. The plot with the punisher is more down to Earth, with his spectactular denouement at the hands of Daredevil and eventual arrest near the beginning of the season. Murdock and Foggy are defending the case against the Punisher, sensing corruption in the DA&rsquo;s office. Foggy is forced by Murdock&rsquo;s lackadaisical attitude (his focus on being Daredevil) to handle the case alone and does a great job. Frank Castle himself torpedoes his own case with his own testimony and goes to jail. There he is a target—but no more than from Wilson Fisk, who wants to use him to eliminate his chief rival.</p>
<p>The other plot line is more fantastical, involving Elektra, who is far from a sympathetic character. I found Elektra to be terribly annoying, with one-dimensional motivations. It turns out that she is the reincarnation of an ancient living weapon that the Hand wants to get their … well … hands on. Lots of back and forth between Daredevil, Stick and Elektra, lots of fighting until they prevail in the end. Well, kinda. Elektra takes the fall, but she can&rsquo;t die (not really) and the Hand collects her body and puts it into their sarcophagus. The end.</p>
</div></dd>
<dt class="field">Hangover Part III (2015) — <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1951261/">4/10</a></dt>
<dd>It&rsquo;s just not doing it for me, anymore. Minus one point for the start of the movie with the giraffe because it was just so deliberately and nonsensically stupid. Chow plays a central role—they long since discovered he&rsquo;s the best thing about these movies—but even he is too exaggerated, though he does the best he can with what he&rsquo;s given.</dd>
<dt class="field">11.22.63 (2015) — <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt2879552/">8/10</a></dt>
<dd>James Franco stars in this adaptation of the Stephen King book. The series follows the book relatively closely—close enough any way—and Franco is really good, as is Chris Cooper, looking grizzled and earnest as always. See my <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=2775">notes on the book</a>, which hold for the series as well.</dd>
<dt class="field">Jim Jeffries: Freedumb (2016) — <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt5849950/">7/10</a></dt>
<dd>I think Jeffries stretches his material a bit too much, meta-discussing his previous specials for a lot of the first third of the show. When he settles down to new material, some of it is quite good.</dd>
<dt class="field">Zootopia (2016) — <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt2948356/">8/10</a></dt>
<dd>This is a surprisingly clever animated film about a city called Zootopia (Zootropolis on this side of the pond), populated by anthropomorphized animals. Their society is split along the lines of Predators and Prey but this split is fraying at the seams, with predator attacks rising just as the integration looked like it was working. Judy Hopps is a rabbit police officer intent on figuring out what&rsquo;s going on. Nick Wilde is a fox who witnessed the latest incident involving an otter (predator) who was kidnapped. Things are much more complex than they would seem, as machinations on both sides lead to evil that goes all the way to the top. Recommended.</dd>
<dt class="field">Walhalla Rising (2009) — <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0862467/">6/10</a></dt>
<dd>Interesting and moody film about a One Eye, a mute warrior of nearly supernatural strength, played by Mads Mikkelsen. He starts off as a warrior slave, used as a gladiator by a traveling band. He eventually escapes with a young boy in tow and, together, they escape on a boat and end up in the New World.</dd>
<dt class="field">The Towering Inferno (1974) — <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0072308/">6/10</a></dt>
<dd>This is a star-packed movie about the grand opening of a skyscraper of record-setting height. Paul Newman is the architect; Steve McQueen the chief firefighter. Together, they try to save the people trapped in the building. Everybody&rsquo;s in this movie: William Holden, Faye Dunaway, Fred Astaire, Richard Chamberlain, O.J. Simpson, Robert Vaughn, Robert Wagner and others more obscure to me. Most of the people overact and it&rsquo;s a bit on the long side, but a ton of money went into effects, so it&rsquo;s a good time.</dd>
<dt class="field">X-Men: Apocalypse (2016) — <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt3385516/">7/10</a></dt>
<dd>An ages-old mutant named Apocalypse, who can permanently absorb powers from other mutants, rises again, from the ruins of the pyramid where he was buried milennia ago. This is another &ldquo;young&rdquo; X-Men movie, with Fassbender and McAvoy playing Professor X and Magneto respectively. When Apocalypse discovers these two, he wants to use Magneto to control the planet, then the Professor to enslave humanity utterly (using Cerebro).</dd>
<dt class="field">Call Me Lucky (2015) — <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt3899932/">6/10</a></dt>
<dd>I was really happy to have been introduced to the comedy of Barry Crimmons and the first 30 minutes were really, really good. Barry, however, derives a lot of the anger that drives his comedy from having been molested by a priest when he was an altar boy. The movie spends a lot of time explaining this part of his life. While essential to his story, it drags quite a big, losing a lot of the momentum achieved in the first third. The movie still ends well, with what I feel is Crimmons&rsquo;s strength: his standup comedy.</dd>
<dt class="field">Flash Gordon (1980) — <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0080745/">7/10</a></dt>
<dd>This movie was much better than expected. Sure, it&rsquo;s cheesy now, but God would I have loved this movie if I&rsquo;d somehow discovered it as a teenager. Princess Aura and her retinue as well as a Dale Arden lent an air of softcore porn to the whole affair, with big, dumb, blond Flash Gordon barely noticing any of it. Max von Sydow as Ming was magnificent; Haim Topol as Dr. Zarkov was also very good. Timothy Dalton was also in it, as Prince Barin, Gordon&rsquo;s chief rival for various affections but eventually a converted adherent.</dd>
<dt class="field">Mascots (2016) — <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt4936176/">6/10</a></dt>
<dd>Christopher Guest—starred in <em>This is Spinal Tap</em> and wrote/directed <em>Best in Show</em>—wrote and directed what feels like a sequel to the latter film. This is the story of a fictitious competition for sports mascots from all over the world. In an interview format, we are introduced to these characters and other family members as they prepare for, make their way to and partake in the competition. It&rsquo;s OK with a few chuckles, but nothing to write home about.</dd>
<dt class="field">Ukraine: Winter on Fire (2015) — <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt4908644/">4/10</a></dt>
<dd>I found this to be an incoherent propaganda-laden documentary about Maiden Square. It was interview-heavy, with interviews exclusively from one side, with information exclusively from one side, with no attempt made to offer explanations for actions other than &ldquo;the other side was evil and wanted to capitulate utterly to Russia and Putin&rdquo;. It was utterly simplistic and didn&rsquo;t offer to explain how much of Ukraine might have felt differently than the relative handful of people that protested, many of which were obviously privileged youth, at the beginning. Of course they were upset that Ukraine didn&rsquo;t join the EU—they were looking forward to moving to London to work for a big bank. The rest of their country would have been subjugated as a vassal country of the EU, a status thoroughly by Greece and other Balkan and Eastern states. The film was at its best when it focused on the violence by the government shock troops against citizens, but again motivations were not explained, alliances not elucidated. It was just taken from granted that the youth, the rebels, were the good guys. They overthrew a democratically elected government, then accused the president of abandoning his post when he fled their credibly violent threats.</dd>
<dt class="field">Joe Rogan: Triggered (2016) — <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt6023444/">9/10</a></dt>
<dd>This was a really solid special from Rogan with a good style and great material, well-delivered. Rogan has a family and mentions them a bit, but he hasn&rsquo;t capitulated his entire career to them (I&rsquo;m looking at you, Patton Oswalt). He&rsquo;s funny, he&rsquo;s dirty and he&rsquo;s right enough of the time to make this a great special.</dd>
<dt class="field">Inside Out (2015) — <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt2096673/">8/10</a></dt>
<dd>The concept is interesting and relatively well-executed, but it&rsquo;s overall too vanilla a treatment for my tastes. Everybody&rsquo;s too white and too nice and too bla. The parents and daughter don&rsquo;t even have a Minnesota accent—they sound like plain middle-of-the-road Americans without the traditional inflection of the north. This kind of threw me because the girl was blubbering to go back to Minnesota but she sounded like she&rsquo;d lived in San Fransisco her whole life. I wondered why? Pixar and Disney pay attention to these details, so the omission of the accent must have been a deliberate choice. </dd>
<dt class="field">Bo Burnham: Make Happy (2016) — <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt5192124/">8/10</a></dt>
<dd>He&rsquo;s young and got famous on YouTube at 16. He&rsquo;s kind of a mix of Jim Carrey, Weird Al, Tim Minchin. I liked him and appreciated his very unique style and presentation. A lot of his jokes came out of nowhere—if the next special is the same, it&rsquo;ll get old, but this time around it felt fresh and funny.</dd>
<dt class="field">Better Call Saul (2015) — <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt3032476/">8/10</a></dt>
<dd>Bob Odenkirk and Jonathan Banks reprise their roles as Saul Goodman and Mike Ehrmantraut, respectively. This two-season (so far) series presents their backstory: Saul started off as Jimmy McGill while Mike is a recently retired cop looking to make better money. It&rsquo;s well-acted, relatively well-written and very well-shot. Recommended.</dd>
<dt class="field">Luke Cage (2016) — <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt3322314/">8/10</a></dt>
<dd>This series present the backstory and rise of Luke Cage as well as Misty Knight in Harlem, New York. They are pitted against criminal forces in the form of Cottonmouth (Cornell Stokes) and his cousin, councilwoman Mariah Dillard. Further into the show, Diamondback appears, seemingly out of nowhere, to seed chaos. The characters are interesting and, for the most part, well-written. It gets a bit weak in the middle, but finishes pretty strong again.</dd>
<dt class="field">First Blood (1982) — <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0083944/">8/10</a></dt>
<dd>I like this movie. I think Stallone is pretty good in it, the fight and forest-combat scenes are quite well-choreographed and the story is much more interesting than people give it credit for.</dd>
<dt class="field">Solomon Kane (2009) — <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0970452/">7/10</a></dt>
<dd>Solomon Kane is a pirate bound for hell, as he finds out when he attacks a castle to plunder it of its gold and finds it occupied by &ldquo;The Devil&rsquo;s Reaper&rdquo;. An effects-heavy action flick with no actors of note, save Max von Sydow in a small role. In the second half, the relentless mud and rain and muck and blood reminded me a lot of the mood in <em>Hard to be a God</em>.</dd>
<dt class="field">The Good Dinosaur (2015) — <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1979388/">2/10</a></dt>
<dd>What a steaming pile of crap this movie is. More like &ldquo;The Bad Dinosaur&rdquo; or &ldquo;The Good-for-nothing Dinosaur&rdquo; or &ldquo;Useless McWhinyPants gets a Participation Award&rdquo;.</dd>
<dt class="field">The Man with the Iron Fists (2012) — <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1258972/">4/10</a></dt>
<dd>This is pretty self-indulgent project on the part of RZA. He wrote and starred in this movie about a black blacksmith in a village in China called &ldquo;the Jungle&rdquo;. Clans fight for power constantly, with much of the action centered on a brothel called The Pink Blossom (subtle). The cast is better than expected, with Lucy Liu playing Madam Blossom (more or less reprising her role from <em>Kill Bill</em>), Dave Bautista the physically impressive Brass Body, Russell Crowe as Jack Knife and Rick Yune as X-Blade. It&rsquo;s not even worth describing most of the plot. Blacksmith gets his arms chopped off by Brass Body, Jack Knife helps him forge and attach Iron Hands that are highly destructive. They all attack the blossom to defeat the usurpers of the Lion clan and get all the gold, … oh, God, I can&rsquo;t go on. The production values, effects and cast are worth a couple of points. Tarentino was involved somehow, but I can&rsquo;t recommend this at all.</dd>
</dl><p><hr></p>
<div class="footnote-reference"><span id="footnote_DRAFTABLE_ENTRY_3263_1_body" class="footnote-number">[1]</span> E.g. when they celebrate various holidays in bed, with a role-reversal for International Woman&rsquo;s Day. Or when she pretends they were talking about the same thing when he was actually proposing to her and her mind was … elsewhere.</div><div class="footnote-reference"><span id="footnote_DRAFTABLE_ENTRY_3263_2_body" class="footnote-number">[2]</span> Ajax may not be able to feel pain, but I have no idea whey he was laughing when Deadpool broke both his arms—no healing power, as he&rsquo;d mentioned earlier—even if he&rsquo;s insane, he&rsquo;s still going to regret not being able to fight the way he used to be able to. Moot point, as Wade also shot him through the top of the head.</div>      </div>
      </div>
        <div class="footer">
    <div class="footer-data"><div class="footer-links"><ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/contact.php" title="">Contact</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/support.php" title="">Support</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/privacy.php" title="">Privacy</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/rights.php" title="">Rights</a></li></ul></div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="copyright">Copyright (c) 1999-2026 earthli.com. All Rights Reserved.</div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="versions">Powered by <ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore/app_news.php">earthli News 3.7</a></li><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore" title="">earthli WebCore&trade; 3.7</a></li></ul></div></div>    </div>
      </div>
  </div>  </body>
</html>
]]>
  </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
      <title type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[High-Rise by J.G. Ballard (1975) (read in 2016)]]>
  </title>
    <id>https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3307</id>
    <link href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3307"/>
    <updated>2016-11-20T21:42:52+01:00</updated>
    <author>
        <name type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[Marco von Ballmoos]]>
  </name>
      <uri>https://earthli.com/users/marco</uri>
    </author>
      <summary type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<blockquote class="quote abstract "><div>Disclaimer: these are notes I took while reading this book. They include citations I found interesting or enlightening or particularly well-written. In some cases, I&rsquo;ve pointed out which of these applies to which citation; in others, I have not. Any benefit you gain from reading these notes is... [<a class="complete-text-link" href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3307">More</a>]</div></blockquote>]]>
  </summary>
      <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<html lang="en">
  <head>
    <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/themes/ice.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/fonts/raleway.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/core/medium.css">
  </head>
  <body>
<div class="style-controls">  <div class="page">
    <div class="page-body">
<div class="info-box-top">
<p>
Published by <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_user.php?name=marco" title="Marco von Ballmoos" class="visible">marco</a> on <span class="date-time">20. Nov 2016 21:42:52 (GMT-5)</span>
</p>
</div>
      <div class="text-flow wide">
  <blockquote class="quote abstract "><div>Disclaimer: these are notes I took while reading this book. They include citations I found interesting or enlightening or particularly well-written. In some cases, I&rsquo;ve pointed out which of these applies to which citation; in others, I have not. Any benefit you gain from reading these notes is purely incidental to the purpose they serve of reminding me what I once read. Please see Wikipedia for a summary if I&rsquo;ve failed to provide one sufficient for your purposes. If my notes serve to trigger an interest in this book, then I&rsquo;m happy for you.</div></blockquote><p>This is another of Ballard&rsquo;s novels that seems to rage against our technological society. In ways, it critiques the same facets of modern, western life as Heller&rsquo;s <em>Something Happened</em>, which also finds nothing to love about modern society or the humans that people large swaths of it. The book documents the potential effects of living in a self-contained vertical village.</p>
<p>The story follows the life of a doctor Laing who, rather than setting up private practice, teaches at a local medical school. In this we already see his satisfaction with middling success rather than a stretching for limits. He is recently divorced, but not unhappily.</p>
<p>He is one of the first tenants of a gigantic new high-rise building, with 50 floors. He quickly begins to enjoy life in the building, leaving only for work. Things go sideways relatively quickly, with almost all residents avoiding outside contact, preferring to stay in the building, associating only with &ldquo;their kind&rdquo;. Their kind being people who live in what they consider to be an acceptable striation of the building&rsquo;s floors.</p>
<p>The residents all drink quite a lot, fool around quite a lot and grow increasingly violent and confrontational. Allegiances change, tribes form and split and re-form. They adopt their own signals and tags and signs and language. Elevators and power break down, water is sporadic, toilets block up, food is scarce. The upper floors fare better than the lower. It doesn&rsquo;t occur to anyone to leave. Not just the building&rsquo;s halls and lobbies and apartments, but also the parking lot is littered with garbage and half-destroyed cars.</p>
<p>The story culminates in the triumph of a group of women over architect and self-crowned &ldquo;king&rdquo; of the building, Anthony Royal, as well as Richard Wilder, a burly ex-rugby player who fancied himself a believable pretender to the throne. All the while, Laing looks on and is satisfied with a kingdom over a tribe of two women further down the building.</p>
<p>The descriptions of destruction and degradation of societal norms invite comparisons to <em>Hard to Be a God</em>, <em>Blindness</em> and <em>Lord of the Flies</em>.</p>
<h2>Citations</h2><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;No one approached the crushed car, or the body embedded in its roof. Seeing the burst tuxedo and the small patent-leather shoes, Laing thought that he recognized the dead man as the jeweller from the 40th floor. His pebble spectacles lay on the ground by the front wheel of the car, their intact lenses reflecting the brilliant lights of the apartment building.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 53</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The further down Royal reached, the greater the damage. Fire safety doors leaned off their hinges, quartz inspection windows punched out. Few corridor and staircase lights still worked, and no effort had been made to replace the broken bulbs. By eight o’clock little light reached the corridors, which became dim tunnels strewn with garbage sacks. The lurid outlines of lettered slogans, aerosolled in luminous paint across the walls, unravelled around him like the decor of a nightmare. Rival&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 107</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;leaving behind the quiet encampment and the young woman beside her yellow lake.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 192</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;novels as The Drowned World and Cocaine Nights, but he is most well-known for Crash (1973) and his autobiographical novel Empire of the Sun (1984), both of which were made into movies and became box office hits.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 208</div></div>      </div>
      </div>
        <div class="footer">
    <div class="footer-data"><div class="footer-links"><ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/contact.php" title="">Contact</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/support.php" title="">Support</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/privacy.php" title="">Privacy</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/rights.php" title="">Rights</a></li></ul></div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="copyright">Copyright (c) 1999-2026 earthli.com. All Rights Reserved.</div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="versions">Powered by <ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore/app_news.php">earthli News 3.7</a></li><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore" title="">earthli WebCore&trade; 3.7</a></li></ul></div></div>    </div>
      </div>
  </div>  </body>
</html>
]]>
  </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
      <title type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[The Cyberiad by Stanislaw Lem (1965; 1974 in English) (read in 2016)]]>
  </title>
    <id>https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3299</id>
    <link href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3299"/>
    <updated>2016-11-20T21:37:42+01:00</updated>
    <author>
        <name type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[Marco von Ballmoos]]>
  </name>
      <uri>https://earthli.com/users/marco</uri>
    </author>
      <summary type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<blockquote class="quote abstract "><div>Disclaimer: these are notes I took while reading this book. They include citations I found interesting or enlightening or particularly well-written. In some cases, I&rsquo;ve pointed out which of these applies to which citation; in others, I have not. Any benefit you gain from reading these notes is... [<a class="complete-text-link" href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3299">More</a>]</div></blockquote>]]>
  </summary>
      <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<html lang="en">
  <head>
    <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/themes/ice.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/fonts/raleway.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/core/medium.css">
  </head>
  <body>
<div class="style-controls">  <div class="page">
    <div class="page-body">
<div class="info-box-top">
<p>
Published by <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_user.php?name=marco" title="Marco von Ballmoos" class="visible">marco</a> on <span class="date-time">20. Nov 2016 21:37:42 (GMT-5)</span>
</p>
</div>
      <div class="text-flow wide">
  <blockquote class="quote abstract "><div>Disclaimer: these are notes I took while reading this book. They include citations I found interesting or enlightening or particularly well-written. In some cases, I&rsquo;ve pointed out which of these applies to which citation; in others, I have not. Any benefit you gain from reading these notes is purely incidental to the purpose they serve of reminding me what I once read. Please see Wikipedia for a summary if I&rsquo;ve failed to provide one sufficient for your purposes. If my notes serve to trigger an interest in this book, then I&rsquo;m happy for you.</div></blockquote><p>This is a collection of short stories qua science-fiction fairy tales about Trurl and Klapaucius, the &ldquo;constructors&rdquo;. They travel far and wide through the galaxy, meeting monarchs great and small, constructing wonderful robots and thinking machines and even clockwork facsimiles of entire universes.</p>
<p>Many of the stories elucidate physical principles in fantastical ways, like their &ldquo;demon of the second kind&rdquo; which is loosely related to Maxwell&rsquo;s Demon. Another story discusses dragons as quantum-like creatures whose probability of existence can be controlled technologically to make them appear where the possibility of their presence would otherwise be vanishingly small. Other stories explore the limits of human knowledge in philosophical ways, as expressed through nearly ludicrously advanced technology, some of which beggars belief. Their construction skills know seemingly no bounds. </p>
<p>We see them start off as bitter rivals and grow to grudging compatriots who even come to one another&rsquo;s rescue, when needed. At the beginning, they seem to be human, but hints dropped throughout the run of stories show them to be clockwork creations themselves.</p>
<h2>Citations</h2><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;[…] the spit and image of Trurl himself&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 22</div></div><p>I&rsquo;d never heard of this form of &ldquo;spitting image&rdquo;, but it makes sense, when you look up the <a href="http://www.thefreedictionary.com/spit+and+image">definition</a>.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;After a while it became clear to him that the construction of the machine itself was child’s play in comparison with the writing of the program. The program found in the head of an average poet, after all, was written by the poet’s civilization, and that civilization was in turn programmed by the civilization that preceded it, and so on to the very Dawn of Time, when those bits of information that concerned the poet-to-be were still swirling about in the primordial chaos of the cosmic deep. Hence in order to program a poetry machine, one would first have to repeat the entire Universe from the beginning—or at least a good piece of it.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 43</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;So they rolled up their sleeves and sat down to experiment—by simulation, that is mathematically and all on paper. And the mathematical models of King Krool and the beast did such fierce battle across the equation-covered table, that the constructors’ pencils kept snapping. Furious, the beast writhed and wriggled its iterated integrals beneath the King’s polynomial blows, collapsed into an infinite series of indeterminate terms, then got back up by raising itself to the nth power, but the King so belabored it with differentials and partial derivatives that its Fourier coefficients all canceled out (see Riemann’s Lemma), and in the ensuing confusion the constructors completely lost sight of both / King and beast. So they took a break, stretched their legs, had a swig from the Leyden jug to bolster their strength, then went back to work and tried it again from the beginning, this time unleashing their entire arsenal of tensor matrices and grand canonical ensembles, attacking the problem with such fervor that the very paper began to smoke. The King rushed forward with all his cruel coordinates and mean values, stumbled into a dark forest of roots and logarithms, had to backtrack, then encountered the beast on a field of irrational numbers (F1) and smote it so grievously that it fell two decimal places and lost an epsilon, but the beast slid around an asymptote and hid in an n-dimensional orthogonal phase space, underwent expansion and came out fuming factorially, and fell upon the King and hurt him passing sore. But the King, nothing daunted, put on his Markov chain mail and all his impervious parameters, took his increment Î”k to infinity and dealt the beast a truly Boolean blow, sent it reeling through an x-axis and several brackets—but the beast, prepared for this, lowered its horns and—wham!!—the pencils flew like mad through transcendental functions and double eigentransformations,&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 68</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;[…] dragons are distinguished by their probability rather than by their actuality, though granted, that probability is overwhelming once they’ve actually come into being. Suppose, for example, one organizes a hunt for such a dragon, surrounds it, closes in, beating the brush. The circle of sportsmen, their weapons cocked and ready, finds only a burnt patch of earth and an unmistakable smell: the dragon, seeing itself cornered, has slipped from real to configurational space. An extremely obtuse and brutal creature, it does this instinctively, of course. Now, ignorant and backward persons will occasionally demand that you show them this configurational space of yours, apparently unaware that electrons, whose existence no one in his right mind would question, also move exclusively in configurational space, their comings and goings fully dependent on curves of probability. Though it is easier not to believe in electrons than in dragons: electrons, at least taken singly, won’t try to make a meal of you.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 86</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;This gave him pause—though it wasn’t so surprising really, when you considered that the localization of these odious phenomena was subject to so-called dragonomalies, in which certain specimens, particularly when abstracted, underwent a “smearing” effect, which was in reality nothing more than a simple isotopic spin acceleration of asynchronous quantum moments. Much as a hand, emerging from the water fingers-first, appears above the surface in the form of five seemingly separate and independent items, so do dragons, emerging from the lairs of their configurational space, on occasion appear to be plural, though in point of fact they are quite singular.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 93</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;the nearest stones slowly lifted into the air, while the dust that the dragon had kicked up, instead of settling, hung in midair and assumed the shape of a sign that clearly read AT YOUR SERVICE GOV. It grew dim—day was night and night was day, it grew cold—hell was freezing over; a couple of stones went out for a stroll and softly chatted of this and that; in short, miracles were happening right and left, yet that horrid monster sitting not more than thirty paces from Klapaucius apparently had no intention of disappearing.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 100</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Nor does the only peril there lie in its vortices, in debris pulled down from dizzy heights by the current, in meteors gone berserk; for some say that in an unknown place, among dark, crepuscular caverns, at the bottom of an immeasurably deep and unplumbed profundity, for ages and ages now there sits a certain creature, anomalous and wholly anonymous, for anyone who meets the thing and learns its name will surely never live to tell a soul.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 142</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;“And are not we as well, if you examine us physically, mechanistically, statistically and meticulously, nothing but the minuscule capering of electron clouds? Positive and negative charges arranged in space? And is our existence not the result of subatomic collisions and the interplay of particles, though we ourselves perceive those molecular cartwheels as fear, longing, or meditation? And when you daydream, what transpires within your brain but the binary algebra of connecting and disconnecting circuits, the continual meandering of electrons?”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 167</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;There was no need, of course, for him to tell me that plenitude, when too plenitudinous, was worse than destitution, for—obviously—what could one do, if there was nothing one could not? Truly, how could a mind, besieged by a sea of paradises, benumbed by a plethora of possibilities, thoroughly stunned by the instant fulfillment of its every wish and whim—decide on anything?&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 206</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Mymosh, thus booted, went flying into the nearby puddle, where his chlorides and iodides mingled with the water, and electrolyte seeped into his head and, bubbling, set up a current there, which traveled around and about, till Mymosh sat up in the mud and thought the following thought:—Apparently, I am!&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 234</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;And at the very moment when Mymosh was imagining the gentle, crystal Baucis and her faithful Ondragor, and as they journeyed hand in hand among the dark suns of his mind, and all the people of the Gozmos looked on in rapt silence, including the Beadlies, and as the pair softly called to one another—the rust-eaten skull cracked open at the touch of the earthenware shard, pushed by a puff of air, and the murky water rushed in over the copper coils and extinguished the current in the logic circuits, and the Gozmos of Mymosh the Selfbegotten attained the perfection, the ultimate perfection that comes with nothingness. And those who unwittingly had brought him, into the world never learned of his passing.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 237</div></div><p>It&rsquo;s hard to imagine that Douglas Adams never saw these lines before he wrote his magnum opus.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;[…] in which I showed that each civilization may choose one of two roads to travel, that is, either fret itself to death, or pet itself to death. And in the course of doing one or the other, it eats its way into the Universe, turning cinders and flinders of stars into toilet seats, pegs, gears, cigarette holders and pillowcases, and it does this because, unable to fathom the Universe, it seeks to change that Fathomlessness into Something Fathomable, and will not stop until the nebulae and planets have been processed to cradles, chamber pots and bombs, all in the name of Sublime Order, for only a Universe with pavement, plumbing, labels and catalogues is, in its sight, acceptable and wholly respectable.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 240</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;[…] let the vile thanatomites and necrophytes thereby be deprived of the chance to congratulate themselves, that Chlorian Theoreticus the Proph, peerless pundit of yore who limned the infinite tomorrow, was of their race! And as they grovel beneath my pedestal, let them have the knowledge that I wished them nothing but the very worst the Universe has to offer, and that the force of my hatred, hurled forth into the future, was equaled only by its impotence! Let them know that I disowned them utterly, and bestowed&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 246</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;He wasn’t a robot, but on the other hand neither was he a man, nor any sapient proteinoid of the glutinous-albuminous variety. The head was round and plump, with red cheeks, but for eyes it had two penny whistles, and for ears it had thuribles, which gave off a thick cloud of incense. He was dressed in orchid pantaloons, a dark blue stripe down either side and appliquéd with dirty scraps of closely written paper, and he wore high heels. In one hand he held a mandolin made entirely of frosted gingerbread, a few bites already missing from the neck. He was snoring peacefully. I leaned over to read the appliqués on his trousers, but could make out only a few since my eyes watered copiously from the incense.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 254</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;We had to bestow happiness, then, without violating any Higher Laws. The problem was further complicated by the fact that most cosmic civilizations long for things, in the depths of their souls, they would never openly admit to. Now what do you do: help them achieve the ends to which the little decency they have prompts them, or instead fulfill their innermost desires? Take, for example, the Dementians and Amentians. The Dementians, in their medieval piety, burnt at the stake all those consorting with the Devil, females especially, and they did this because, first, they envied them their unholy delights, and secondly, they found that administering torture in the form of justice could’ be a positive pleasure. The Amentians, on the other hand, worshiped nothing but their bodies, which they stimulated by means of machines, though in moderation, and this activity constituted their chief amusement. They had boxes of glass, and into these they placed various outrages, rapes and mutilations, the sight of which served to whet their sensual appetites. On this planet we dropped a multitude of devices designed to satisfy all desires in such a way that no one needed to be harmed, that is, each device created a separate artificial reality for each individual. Within six weeks both Dementians and Amentians had perished, to a man, from a surfeit of joy, groaning in ecstasy as they passed away! Is that the sort of ingenuity you had in mind, O undeveloped one?”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 267</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;True, the Anthropods are at constant war with the Arthropoids over the burning question of whether Moles Have Holes, or, contrariwise, Holes Moles, but observe that as a rule less than half of each generation perishes in that controversy. Now you would have me drive from their heads all belief in obbling, Dimbligensians and so forth, in order to prepare them for rational happiness. Yet this is tantamount to psychic murder, for the resultant minds would be no longer Anthropodous or Arthropoidal—surely you can see that.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 269</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;“Unquestionably! But kindly observe that on that planet there are now close to seven million penitents who have spent a lifetime struggling against their own nature, solely that their fellow citizens might be delivered from the Gugh. And in less than a minute I am to tell them, convince them beyond a shadow of a doubt that all this effort was in vain, that they had wasted their entire lives in pointless, useless sacrifice? How cruel that would be! Superstition must yield to knowledge, but this takes time. Consider the hunchback we spoke of earlier—there Ignorance is indeed Bliss, for he believes his hump fulfills some cosmic role in the great work of Creation. Telling him that it’s actually the product of a molecular accident will only serve to make him despair.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 269</div></div>      </div>
      </div>
        <div class="footer">
    <div class="footer-data"><div class="footer-links"><ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/contact.php" title="">Contact</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/support.php" title="">Support</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/privacy.php" title="">Privacy</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/rights.php" title="">Rights</a></li></ul></div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="copyright">Copyright (c) 1999-2026 earthli.com. All Rights Reserved.</div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="versions">Powered by <ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore/app_news.php">earthli News 3.7</a></li><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore" title="">earthli WebCore&trade; 3.7</a></li></ul></div></div>    </div>
      </div>
  </div>  </body>
</html>
]]>
  </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
      <title type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[Numero Zero by Umberto Eco (2015) (read in 2016)]]>
  </title>
    <id>https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3298</id>
    <link href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3298"/>
    <updated>2016-11-20T21:33:53+01:00</updated>
    <author>
        <name type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[Marco von Ballmoos]]>
  </name>
      <uri>https://earthli.com/users/marco</uri>
    </author>
      <summary type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<blockquote class="quote abstract "><div>Disclaimer: these are notes I took while reading this book. They include citations I found interesting or enlightening or particularly well-written. In some cases, I&rsquo;ve pointed out which of these applies to which citation; in others, I have not. Any benefit you gain from reading these notes is... [<a class="complete-text-link" href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3298">More</a>]</div></blockquote>]]>
  </summary>
      <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<html lang="en">
  <head>
    <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/themes/ice.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/fonts/raleway.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/core/medium.css">
  </head>
  <body>
<div class="style-controls">  <div class="page">
    <div class="page-body">
<div class="info-box-top">
<p>
Published by <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_user.php?name=marco" title="Marco von Ballmoos" class="visible">marco</a> on <span class="date-time">20. Nov 2016 21:33:53 (GMT-5)</span>
</p>
</div>
      <div class="text-flow wide">
  <blockquote class="quote abstract "><div>Disclaimer: these are notes I took while reading this book. They include citations I found interesting or enlightening or particularly well-written. In some cases, I&rsquo;ve pointed out which of these applies to which citation; in others, I have not. Any benefit you gain from reading these notes is purely incidental to the purpose they serve of reminding me what I once read. Please see Wikipedia for a summary if I&rsquo;ve failed to provide one sufficient for your purposes. If my notes serve to trigger an interest in this book, then I&rsquo;m happy for you.</div></blockquote><p>As ever with Eco, this is not just a novel, but a meta-book about the making of a book detailing the inner workings and construction of a non-partisan newspaper that will tell the &ldquo;truth&rdquo;. The newspaper is the brainchild of an eccentric tycoon Commendator Vimercate, but the purpose is that just the idea of the newspaper is to serve as a lever on shadowy figures of power, who will allow him into their inner sanctum in exchange for his shutting it down. In effect, the newspaper will never be and the book documenting its rise as well, but it has to be seen to have real potentiality in order for its effect to be served. Convoluted as ever, Eco&rsquo;s prose and his ability to make this concept believable carry him a long way.</p>
<p>The story follows the tales of the various reporters from the various beats, going down the rabbit holes of one conspiracy after another (as usual for Eco, for whom the semiotics of conspiracy was a special passion). Though they should be telling the truth, the various journalists bandy about obviously fabricated stories that they purport get closer to the &ldquo;truth&rdquo; than true stories would. The main theory is proposed by Braggadocio (one of many puns) who doggedly pursues a story of Mussolini having survived the second World War and having pulled the levers of power long into the 1970s. As ever, there are enough bits of real history woven in so as to make it nearly impossible to tell what&rsquo;s true and false, as Eco was delighted to have it. See <em>Foucault&rsquo;s Pendulum</em> for an even more extravagant and interwoven and longer treatment of the same idea.</p>
<p>In the end, the main character Colonna has a book but no publisher and no interest because the newspaper about which he wrote never existed. Nor could he be sure to be able to use his story without attracting the attention of possibly existing shadowy forces that he fear might try to stop him. He takes his salary and slinks away.</p>
<h2>Citations</h2><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Losers, like autodidacts, always know much more than winners. If you want to win, you need to know just one thing and not to waste your time on anything else: the pleasures of erudition are reserved for losers. The more a person knows, the more things have gone wrong.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 8</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;“Take the major British or American newspapers. If they report, say, a fire or a car accident, then obviously they can’t indulge in saying what they think. And so they introduce into the piece, in quotation marks, the statements of a witness, a man in the street, someone who represents public opinion. Those statements, once put in quotes, become facts—in other words, it’s a fact that that person expressed that opinion. But it might be assumed that the journalist has only quoted someone who thinks like him. So there will be two conflicting statements to show, as a fact, that there are varying opinions on a particular issue, and the newspaper is taking account of this irrefutable fact. The trick lies in quoting first a trivial opinion and then another opinion that is more respectable, and more closely reflects the journalist’s view. In this way, readers are under the impression that they are being informed about two facts, but they’re persuaded to accept just one view as being more convincing.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 45</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;From time to time I hoped it might have been Boggia, the killer from a hundred years ago, who had materialized at night in Via Bagnera, through a sudden rent in time and space (what did Vonnegut call it? a chrono-synclastic infundibulum),&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 181</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;“You’re forgetting, my love, that Italy is slowly turning into one of those havens you want to banish yourself to. If we’ve managed to both accept and forget all those things the BBC has recounted, it means we are getting used to the idea of losing the sense of shame. Didn’t you see that all those interviewed were happily telling us what they’d done and were almost expecting a medal for it? No more Baroque chiaroscuro, everything in broad daylight, as though painted by the impressionists: corruption rife, Mafiosi officially in parliament, tax dodgers in government, and the only ones to end up in prison are Albanian chicken thieves. Decent people will carry on voting for the hoodlums because they won’t believe the BBC, or they don’t watch such programs because they’re glued to trash, perhaps Vimercate’s home shopping channels will end up on early evening television, and if someone important is murdered, he gets a state funeral.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 190</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;All we have to do is wait: once this country of ours has finally joined the Third World, the living will be easy, as if it were all Copacabana, the hottest spot south of Havana.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 191</div></div>      </div>
      </div>
        <div class="footer">
    <div class="footer-data"><div class="footer-links"><ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/contact.php" title="">Contact</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/support.php" title="">Support</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/privacy.php" title="">Privacy</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/rights.php" title="">Rights</a></li></ul></div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="copyright">Copyright (c) 1999-2026 earthli.com. All Rights Reserved.</div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="versions">Powered by <ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore/app_news.php">earthli News 3.7</a></li><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore" title="">earthli WebCore&trade; 3.7</a></li></ul></div></div>    </div>
      </div>
  </div>  </body>
</html>
]]>
  </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
      <title type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[Revenge: A Novel by Stephen Fry (2000) (read in 2016)]]>
  </title>
    <id>https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3297</id>
    <link href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3297"/>
    <updated>2016-11-20T21:29:57+01:00</updated>
    <author>
        <name type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[Marco von Ballmoos]]>
  </name>
      <uri>https://earthli.com/users/marco</uri>
    </author>
      <summary type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<blockquote class="quote abstract "><div>Disclaimer: these are notes I took while reading this book. They include citations I found interesting or enlightening or particularly well-written. In some cases, I&rsquo;ve pointed out which of these applies to which citation; in others, I have not. Any benefit you gain from reading these notes is... [<a class="complete-text-link" href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3297">More</a>]</div></blockquote>]]>
  </summary>
      <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<html lang="en">
  <head>
    <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/themes/ice.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/fonts/raleway.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/core/medium.css">
  </head>
  <body>
<div class="style-controls">  <div class="page">
    <div class="page-body">
<div class="info-box-top">
<p>
Published by <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_user.php?name=marco" title="Marco von Ballmoos" class="visible">marco</a> on <span class="date-time">20. Nov 2016 21:29:57 (GMT-5)</span>
</p>
</div>
      <div class="text-flow wide">
  <blockquote class="quote abstract "><div>Disclaimer: these are notes I took while reading this book. They include citations I found interesting or enlightening or particularly well-written. In some cases, I&rsquo;ve pointed out which of these applies to which citation; in others, I have not. Any benefit you gain from reading these notes is purely incidental to the purpose they serve of reminding me what I once read. Please see Wikipedia for a summary if I&rsquo;ve failed to provide one sufficient for your purposes. If my notes serve to trigger an interest in this book, then I&rsquo;m happy for you.</div></blockquote><p><small class="notes">This book is also known as <em>The Stars’ Tennis Balls</em>, which is why this book was so familiar to me, but I couldn’t quite place why. I’d <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/news/view_article.php?id=2459">read it before but under the other title</a>.</small></p>
<p>This is a modern re-telling of Dumas&rsquo;s <em>Count of Monte Christo</em>, with Edward &ldquo;Ned&rdquo; Maddstone playing the main role. He is a good-looking, sporty, averagely intelligent and socially well-placed young man to whom everything has always come easily because no obstacles have ever been allowed to remain in his way. He is blissfully unaware of how good he has it. He has a lovely, lovely girlfriend. He has some friends, all of whom hate him very much, for various reasons.</p>
<p>These friends conspire to get him arrested, but a bad coincidence leads him into the hands of a secret service with every reason to eliminate him, as well. So, what starts off as an evil schoolboy prank that would have resulted in real but limited prison time or at least parole, turns instead to permanent banishment to a remote island of political prisoners. Ned is, to say the least, utterly out of his depth and bewildered beyond knowing. Nothing in his life has prepared him for this challenge, as he&rsquo;s never had to surmount a real challenge himself.</p>
<p>At the island, he is psychologically re-programmed to believe that his previous life was a fiction produced by his madness. There he meets &ldquo;Babe&rdquo;, another prisoner, put there because he was nearly unbelievably dangerously talented and intelligent. He was a spy who&rsquo;d outlived his usefulness. Babe takes Ned under his wing and teaches him everything he knows over the next twenty years. Babe helps him remember his past and helps him decipher what happened to him.</p>
<p>Babe dies of a heart attack and Ned takes the opportunity to escape the island. Armed with Babes bank account and knowledge (not the least of nine languages), he builds a software empire as Simon Cotter and plans his complex and nefarious revenge on those who wronged him. The manner of this revenge is intricate and exquisitely detailed and deliciously just. He does not stumble or deviate from his path, although he loses everything he&rsquo;d perhaps hoped to gain, retreating to the island whence he came.</p>
<h2>Citations</h2><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Mother and Father gave you that name. And the criminal part of it is that, as a name, it’s only just off. Roy or Lee or Kevin or Dean or Wayne, they’re the real thing. Echt Lumpenproletariat. Dennis and Desmond and Leonard and Norman and Colin and Neville and Eric are revolting, but they are honest. Ashley, though. It’s a Howard or a Lindsay or a Leslie kind of a name. It’s nearly there. It seems to be trying to be there. And that, surely, is the saddest thing of all.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 336-340</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Carry off the ease that belies any sense of anything at all having to be carried off, if that isn’t too baroque. Carry off that natural, effortless taking-it-all-for-granted air. But&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 361-362</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Slowly you have become infected by a northern accent. Not obvious, just a trace, but to your sensitive, highly attuned ears as glaring as a cleft palate. You began to pronounce “One” and “None” to rhyme with “Shone” and “Gone” instead of “Shun” and “Gun,” you gently sounded the “g’s in “Ringing” and “Singing.” At school you even rhyme “Mud” with “Good” and “Grass” with “Lass.” Fair enough, you would be beaten up as a southern poof otherwise, but you have trailed some of that linguistic mud into the house with you.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 371-376</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;“Shall we formulate it this way? Money is to Everything as an Airplane is to Australia. The airplane isn’t Australia, but it remains the only practical way we know of reaching it. So perhaps, metonymically, the airplane is Australia after all.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 446-448</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Ashley wasn’t popular, he was fully aware of that. He wasn’t one of them. He sounded right, but he wasn’t one of them. He sounded too right. These cretinous sons of upper-class broodmares and high-pedigreed stallions, they were loutish and graceless, entirely undeserving of the privilege accorded them. He, Ashley Barson-Garland, stood apart because he wasn’t enough of an oik. Such splendid irony.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 482-485</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;What she really wanted to say was “So we’re going to arrive at Lucca in time to find all the shops and cafés shut, are we? And as usual we’re going to have to wander around a completely empty and deserted town for five hours until everyone else has woken from their siestas. That’s a great plan, Pete.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 553-556</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Portia realized that saying “Neither did I, you don’t have to ‘study’ something to know about it” would sound arrogant, so once again, she curbed her tongue.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 562-563</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;There seemed to be millions out there who could not understand that their problem was not this or that injustice or social ill, but the diminished sense of self that caused them to blame anything other than their own bitterness and rage: to bolster this delusion, that was the supreme dishonesty. There were people who believed that their opportunities to live a fulfilled life were hampered by the number of Asians in England, by the existence of a royal family, by the volume of traffic that passed by their house, by the malice of trade unions, by the power of callous employers, by the refusal of the health service to take their condition seriously, by communism, by capitalism, by atheism, by anything, in fact, but their own futile, weak-minded failure to get a fucking grip.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 765-770</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Most people, after all, can imagine having terminal cancer, they can’t begin to imagine having brains.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 787-788</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;shrugged with open hands as if to suggest that, while I may have picked up the odd pebble of interest on the shore, like Newton I was all too aware of the great ocean of knowledge that lay undiscovered before me.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 820-822</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;“Cradle of democracy” indeed. Did he not know that Americans regarded Washington as the cradle of democracy, just as the French did Paris and the Greeks Athens, and no doubt the Icelanders Reykjavík, each with as much reason? Such typically casual arrogance.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 886-888</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The essential truth that people always failed to understand about intelligence, Ashley believed, was that it allowed its possessor deeper intuition and keener instincts than those granted to others. Stupid people liked to delude themselves that while they may not be clever, they were at least able to compensate with feelings and insights denied to the intellectual. Drivel, Ashley thought. It was precisely this kind of false belief that made stupid people so stupid. The truth was that clever people had infinitely more resources from which to make the leaps of connection that the world called intuition. What was “intelligence,” after all, but the ability to read into things?&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 902-906</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;“Well, please excuse me, your highness. I’m sorry I’m so shockingly unfamiliar with the delicate nuances of the social calendar. I’m afraid my time these days is taken up with trivial things like history and social justice. There just never seems to be enough left over to devote to the really important issues, like how the upper classes organize their year. I really must get round to it one day.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 1424-1427</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;“Here before you were a watery drop of seed down your sinful father’s leg, you miserable perverted gobshite cunt,” murmured Babe, resetting the white queen with great care.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 2409-2410</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;His course of instruction began with games played by Phillidor and Morphy and masterpieces of the romantic age, games that, like paintings, had titles: titles like the Evergreen, the Two Dukes, and the Immortal. Ned was moved from these towards the age of Steinitz and the modern style, then to an understanding of a positional theory called the hypermodern that made his head ache. Next came an induction into opening play and counterplay whose language made Ned laugh. The Caro-Kann and the Queen’s Indian, the Sicilian and the French Defenses, the Gioco Piano and the Ruy Lopez. The Dragon variation, the Tartakower, and the Nimzowitch. The Queen’s Gambit Declined and the Queen’s Gambit Accepted. The Marshall Attack. The Maroczy Bind. The Poisoned Pawn.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 2489-2494</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;But more than that, you understand the greatest chess secret of all. The best move you can ever play in chess is not the best move. No, the best move you can ever play is the move your opponent least wants you to play. And that you did time after time. You knew that I hate the turgid tactical hell of the French, didn’t you? I never told you, but you sensed it. Oh my God, boy, I could hug you I’m so proud.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 2581-2585</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Babe’s brain and memory were, after all, a simple matter of genetic fortune, and he took no pride in them whatsoever: He had come to discover that it was his will and his will alone that marked him out from common men. And will—unlike cerebral proficiency—could be taught, passed on, and made to live forever.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 2634-2637</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;“Fluency equals necessity times confidence over time,” Babe liked to say. “If a five-year-old can speak a language, it cannot be beyond a fifty-year-old.” “But a five-year-old can run around for hours, tumbling and falling over without getting tired,” Ned might often complain. “It doesn’t follow that a fifty-year-old can do the same.” “Bolshy talk. I’ll have none of it.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 2664-2668</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;“And all we have, you and I, is that very thing, time, and if we look on this as the most magnificent gift afforded to mankind, then we can see that in this place we are one with Augustine in his cell and Montaigne in his tower. We are the chosen, the privileged. We have what the richest man on earth most covets and can never buy. We have what Henri Bergson saw as God’s chief instrument of torture and madness.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 2681-2683</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;“And all we have, you and I, is that very thing, time, and if we look on this as the most magnificent gift afforded to mankind, then we can see that in this place we are one with Augustine in his cell and Montaigne in his tower. We are the chosen, the privileged. We have what the richest man on earth most covets and can never buy. We have what Henri Bergson saw as God’s chief instrument of torture and madness. Time. Oceans of time in which to be and to become.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 2681-2684</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;But I had a conscience, Ned, and the day came when I went to see a writer friend of mine. I told him I wanted to collaborate on a book. A great book, to be published in America, for they would never have let it see the light of day in Britain. A book that would blow the whistle on every dirty trick, every hypocritical evasion, and every filthy lie that ever came out of the West in its squalid battle for supremacy over its perceived enemy. I’m not a traitor, Ned, nor never would be. I loved England. I loved it too well to let it sink lower than the level of a dung beetle in its pursuit of lost grandeur.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 2696-2700</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;“Like anyone with a sliver of honesty in them, I believe what I find I believe when I wake up each morning. Sometimes I can only think we are determined by the writing in our genes; sometimes it seems to me that we are made or unmade by our upbringings. On better days, it is true that I hope with some conviction that we and we alone make ourselves everything that we are.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 2708-2711</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;“We have a heap!” Babe clapped his hands. “A heap of fir cones! Seventeen of the darlings. So Ned Maddstone is telling the world that seventeen is officially a heap?” “Well  .  .  .” “Seventeen fir cones constitute a heap, but sixteen do not?” “No, I’m not saying that exactly.  .  .  .” “There we have the problem. The world is full of heaps like this, Ned. This is good, this is not good. This is bad luck, but this is a towering injustice. This is mass murder and this genocide. This is child killing, this abortion. This is lawful intercourse, this statutory rape. There is nothing but a single fir cone’s difference between them, sometimes just the one lonely only little cone telling us that it represents the difference between heaven and hell.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 2733-2741</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Whatever arrogance he may have displayed, Ned would never in those days have assumed that his feelings had primacy over those of others. That they could be so confident in their interpretation of him was an arrogance way beyond anything he had been capable of. They hid their rage. They pretended to like him. They coldly planned to disgrace him in the eyes of his father and his lover, as if he had no emotional life, no point of view, and no right to happiness of his own. That they could treat him as a symbol without life or capacity for pain marked them down as evil beyond imagining. There did not exist the faintest possibility that Ned could ever forgive them.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 2964-2969</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Babe opened the hand that had been grasping Ned’s. A small fold of paper was clipped between his fingers. “Take it. There is money there; perhaps after thirty years it is more than you can spend. The Cotter Bank, Geneva. When they found out that it was missing they came here to question me. I had hidden its trail and they were mad with rage. ‘Where is it? What have you done with it?’ I had been here no more than a month, but Mallo had passed that month jolting my brain with electricity and filling me with drugs. The violence of my behavior had given him no choice. I had known they would come, you see, and I wanted to be ready. When they arrived, I dribbled, I giggled, I simpered, I slobbered, and I wept. You would have been proud of me, Ned. I was the maddest of the mad. A ruin of a noble mind. They went away cursing, in the belief that they had destroyed the sanity of the only man who knew where all that money lay. I’d love to know how they explained it to their minister. Now, read that piece of paper, learn it, and destroy it. The Cotter Bank, Geneva. All the money will be yours when you leave here.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 3105-3113</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;“Good-bye, my boy. You have already saved my life. My mind will live forever in yours. Build great things in my memory and to my memory. We have loved each other. For my sake now, stop your howling. Go quietly and pass this last day in remembering. Remember everything. You take my love and memory with you forever.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 3140-3142</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The Ned who traveled now was an entirely different being, a man of iron will, an avenging angel—an instrument of God.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 3339-3340</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;No, the tide of history had washed weirder flotsam than Barson-Garland into Downing Street, and no doubt would do so again. If he succeeded in getting Simon Cotter to unbelt some of his millions and drop them in the Tory coffers, Ashley would take a deal of stopping.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 4057-4059</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;“It grieves me to relate that I do not have the honor of Mr. Snow’s acquaintance.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 4093-4094</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The Barson-Garland Page was turning out to be something of a succès d’estime. Taking a cue from the regular columnists on the rival evening paper, Ashley found that he had a gift for tediously obvious opinions expressed in a formulaic polemical style that exactly suited the kind of brain-fagged commuter most ready to confuse polysyllabic misanthropy for intelligent thought.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 4383-4386</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;I once shared a stage with Gore Vidal in Manchester, England, which was a very great honor indeed, although he did not appear to appreciate it. No, but, tush. Mr. Vidal was asked if he felt there had ever been an age in recent history that could boast so few good writers as the present. “There are as many good writers as ever there were,” he replied, and I wish I could reproduce on the page the trademark patrician Gore-drawl that transforms his lightest remark into a marmoreal epigram. “The problem is that there are so few good readers.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 5711-5715</div></div>      </div>
      </div>
        <div class="footer">
    <div class="footer-data"><div class="footer-links"><ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/contact.php" title="">Contact</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/support.php" title="">Support</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/privacy.php" title="">Privacy</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/rights.php" title="">Rights</a></li></ul></div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="copyright">Copyright (c) 1999-2026 earthli.com. All Rights Reserved.</div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="versions">Powered by <ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore/app_news.php">earthli News 3.7</a></li><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore" title="">earthli WebCore&trade; 3.7</a></li></ul></div></div>    </div>
      </div>
  </div>  </body>
</html>
]]>
  </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
      <title type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[Making History by Stephen Fry (1997) (read in 2016)]]>
  </title>
    <id>https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3296</id>
    <link href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3296"/>
    <updated>2016-11-20T21:23:00+01:00</updated>
    <author>
        <name type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[Marco von Ballmoos]]>
  </name>
      <uri>https://earthli.com/users/marco</uri>
    </author>
      <summary type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<blockquote class="quote abstract "><div>Disclaimer: these are notes I took while reading this book. They include citations I found interesting or enlightening or particularly well-written. In some cases, I&rsquo;ve pointed out which of these applies to which citation; in others, I have not. Any benefit you gain from reading these notes is... [<a class="complete-text-link" href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3296">More</a>]</div></blockquote>]]>
  </summary>
      <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<html lang="en">
  <head>
    <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/themes/ice.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/fonts/raleway.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/core/medium.css">
  </head>
  <body>
<div class="style-controls">  <div class="page">
    <div class="page-body">
<div class="info-box-top">
<p>
Published by <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_user.php?name=marco" title="Marco von Ballmoos" class="visible">marco</a> on <span class="date-time">20. Nov 2016 21:23:00 (GMT-5)</span>
</p>
</div>
      <div class="text-flow wide">
  <blockquote class="quote abstract "><div>Disclaimer: these are notes I took while reading this book. They include citations I found interesting or enlightening or particularly well-written. In some cases, I&rsquo;ve pointed out which of these applies to which citation; in others, I have not. Any benefit you gain from reading these notes is purely incidental to the purpose they serve of reminding me what I once read. Please see Wikipedia for a summary if I&rsquo;ve failed to provide one sufficient for your purposes. If my notes serve to trigger an interest in this book, then I&rsquo;m happy for you.</div></blockquote><p>This is the story of Michael Young, a doctoral student who is on the verge of delivering his oral presentation of an obscure bit of history involving Adolf Hitler and his mother. Through a series of coincidences, he meets Leo Zuckerman, a physicist who has invented a machine that can look back in time. Together, with a shared interest and passion for the era of the rise of Hitler, they set about modifying the machine to enable them to not only look but to make slight changes. The slight change they make is to pollute the water supply of Brunau (the town in which Hitler was born) with an experimental male contraceptive, preventing Hitler&rsquo;s birth.</p>
<p>Part two begins with Michael awakening not in England but in Princeton in America in an alternate future engendered by his and Leo&rsquo;s meddling. The alternate history is one even worse than the one with Hitler in it, a world dominated by a charming, brilliant anti-Semitic polyglot who not only survives WWII but leads Germany and his Nazi party to victory over the world.  He exterminates all Jews using the Brunau water to sterilize the lot of them.</p>
<p>Michael is horrified and endeavors to locate Leo, who is also wracked with guilt and has, once again, developed a Temporal Imager. They once again modify the machine and concoct a plan to poison the Brunau water with a dead rat, preventing anyone from drinking the water and therefore the contraceptive in it. The timeline is restored, with Michael waking to a more familiar reality, albeit it with some slight changes again.</p>
<h2>Citations</h2><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Below me, Jamie and Double Eddie leaned forward from the bank, tugged on a fishing line and hauled in a bottle of white wine from the water. Whatever happened to them, I thought, they would have days like this to look back upon. In dank provincial libraries in February as, balding and bitter, they fussed over their mugs of Earl Grey; in local news production offices, fighting for budgets; in classrooms, floundering in the chaos of contemptuous thugs; at the Crush Bar in Covent Garden, twittering over a diva’s tessitura—wherever they might wash up, always they would have a memory of being nineteen, with flat stomachs, dazzling hair and bottles of river-cooled Sancerre.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 96</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;“You are looking,” says Leo pointing at the screen, “at Auschwitz Concentration Camp on the ninth of October, 1942.” I frown in puzzlement. So slow. I am so slow. “How do you mean?” “I mean how I mean. This is Auschwitz on October ninth. Three o’clock in the afternoon. You are looking at that day.” I stare again at the lovely billowing shapes in their sweet rippling colors. “You mean . . . a film?” “Still you ask what I mean and still I mean what I mean and still you do not grasp what I mean. I mean that you are looking at both a place and a time.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 122</div></div><p>He disparages him for not immediately leaping to the conclusion that he&rsquo;s looking at a time machine. What a jerk.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;“If you keep making that horrible hawking noise to clear it I’m going to leave the country and never come back,” says Jane. “You won’t even get a postcard.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 138</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Kurfürstendamm&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 175</div></div>      </div>
      </div>
        <div class="footer">
    <div class="footer-data"><div class="footer-links"><ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/contact.php" title="">Contact</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/support.php" title="">Support</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/privacy.php" title="">Privacy</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/rights.php" title="">Rights</a></li></ul></div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="copyright">Copyright (c) 1999-2026 earthli.com. All Rights Reserved.</div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="versions">Powered by <ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore/app_news.php">earthli News 3.7</a></li><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore" title="">earthli WebCore&trade; 3.7</a></li></ul></div></div>    </div>
      </div>
  </div>  </body>
</html>
]]>
  </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
      <title type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[The Hippopotamus by Stephen Fry (1994) (read in 2016)]]>
  </title>
    <id>https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3295</id>
    <link href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3295"/>
    <updated>2016-11-20T21:19:29+01:00</updated>
    <author>
        <name type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[Marco von Ballmoos]]>
  </name>
      <uri>https://earthli.com/users/marco</uri>
    </author>
      <summary type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<blockquote class="quote abstract "><div>Disclaimer: these are notes I took while reading this book. They include citations I found interesting or enlightening or particularly well-written. In some cases, I&rsquo;ve pointed out which of these applies to which citation; in others, I have not. Any benefit you gain from reading these notes is... [<a class="complete-text-link" href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3295">More</a>]</div></blockquote>]]>
  </summary>
      <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<html lang="en">
  <head>
    <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/themes/ice.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/fonts/raleway.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/core/medium.css">
  </head>
  <body>
<div class="style-controls">  <div class="page">
    <div class="page-body">
<div class="info-box-top">
<p>
Published by <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_user.php?name=marco" title="Marco von Ballmoos" class="visible">marco</a> on <span class="date-time">20. Nov 2016 21:19:29 (GMT-5)</span>
</p>
</div>
      <div class="text-flow wide">
  <blockquote class="quote abstract "><div>Disclaimer: these are notes I took while reading this book. They include citations I found interesting or enlightening or particularly well-written. In some cases, I&rsquo;ve pointed out which of these applies to which citation; in others, I have not. Any benefit you gain from reading these notes is purely incidental to the purpose they serve of reminding me what I once read. Please see Wikipedia for a summary if I&rsquo;ve failed to provide one sufficient for your purposes. If my notes serve to trigger an interest in this book, then I&rsquo;m happy for you.</div></blockquote><p>Edward is the &ldquo;Hippo&rdquo; and the star of this novel, so-called because of the combination of his girth and his penchant for long baths. He is a one-time up-and-coming poet reduced to a theater critic by waning talent, insufficient gumption and a teensy problem with alcohol. He is swept up in the affairs of his rich-and-famous family when they variously ask him to help discover the secret behind the seeming miraculous workings of his godson. He goes to the stately manor of his old friend, the child&rsquo;s father and proceeds to surreptitiously investigate the matter, collecting information and impressions from the various other hangers-on. He slowly forms a theory, dispensing disputable wisdom and folly all the while, until the story culminates—as you would expect—in a revelatory conclusion at a large dinner party, in which the Hippo explains all and solves the mystery.</p>
<h2>Citations</h2><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;You can’t imagine, if you’re younger than me, which statistically speaking you are bound to be, what it is like to have been born into the booze-and-smokes generation. It’s one thing for a man to find, as he ages, that the generations below him are trashier, more promiscuous, less disciplined and a whole continent more pig-ignorant and shit-stupid than his own—every generation makes that discovery— but to sense all around you a creeping puritanism, to see noses wrinkle as you stumble by, to absorb the sympathetic disgust of the pink-lunged, clean-livered, clear-eyed young, to be made to feel as if you have missed a bus no one ever told you about that’s going to a place you’ve never heard of, that can come a bit hard.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 7</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;She brought them over, folded a leg under herself and sank down on an ottoman, which was moronically tricked out in a design which would turn out, I supposed, to be taken from some Mayan funeral shroud or mystic Balinese menstrual cloth. The grand idea behind such a squalid episode of cultural rape and the other equally feeble, equally impertinent conceits that littered this appalling room, I supposed, was that Jane would dispose herself there, surrounded by friends, the diversity of whose drinking habits would justify the ludicrous range of unopened liqueur, aperitif and spirit bottles on display, while gentle yet probing conversational topics were flicked like shuttlecocks about the room.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 23</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;“Well, my darling. If you’ve made peace with your enemies and said goodbye to your friends, you shouldn’t be too sorry to leave the party early. It’s a grotty world and a grotty age and we’ll all be joining you soon enough.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 24</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;there was a boy sitting half-way up the baroque steps that poured from the front portico like a thick stream of molten lava.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 66</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The rare words often annoy the punter, but they never think, they never stop to think about a poet’s life. A painter has oils, acrylics and pastels, turpentine, linseed, canvas, sable and hog’s hair. When did you last employ such things routinely? To oil a cricket bat or mascara an eyelid, perhaps. Come to think of it, you’ve probably never oiled a cricket bat in your life, but you know what I mean. And musicians: a musician has entire machines of wood, brass, gut and carbon fibre; he has augmented sevenths, accidentals, Dorian modes and twelve-note rows. When did you ever use an augmented seventh as a way of getting back at your boyfriend or a bassoon obbligato to order pizza? Never. Never, never, never. The poet, though. Oh, yes, the poor poet: pity the poor bloody poet. The poet has no reserved materials, no unique modes. He has nothing but words, the same tools that the whole cursed world uses to ask the way to the nearest lavatory, or with which they patter out excuses for the clumsy betrayals and shiftless evasions of their ordinary lives; the poet has nothing but the same, self-same, words that daily in a million shapes and phrases curse, pray, abuse, flatter and mislead. The poor bloody poet can no longer say “ope” for “open,” or “swain” for “youth,” he is expected to construct new poems out of the plastic and Styrofoam garbage that litters the twentieth-century linguistic floor, to make fresh art from the used verbal condoms of social intercourse. Is it any wonder that, from time to time, we take refuge in “gellies” and “ataractic” and “watchet”? Innocent words, virgin words, words uncontaminated and unviolated, the very mastery of which announces us to possess a relationship with language akin to that of the sculptor with his marble or the composer with his staves. Not that anyone is ever impressed, of course. They only moan about the “impenetrability” or congratulate themselves for being hep to the ellipsis, opacity and allusion that they believe deepens and enriches the work. It’s a bastard profession, believe me.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 73</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;You catch sight of something perfectly ordinary, such as it might be bluebells nodding on an embankment, or a family picnicking in a lay-by, and suddenly your mind can no longer support the notion of a whole world full of life and objects and fellow-humans. The very idea of a universe appears monstrous and you become unable to participate. What on earth does that tree think it is up to? Why is that heap of gravel sitting there so patiently? What am I doing, staring out of a window? Why are all these molecules of glass hanging together so as to allow me to look through them? The moment passes, of course, and we return to the proper realm of our dull thoughts and our duller newspapers: in less than a second we are part of the world again, ready to be irritated into apoplexy by the stupidity of a government minister or lured into caring about some asinine new movement in conceptual art; once again we become a part of the great compost heap.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 90</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Simon, for whom poetry is a closed book in a locked cupboard in a high attic in a lonely house in a remote hamlet in a distant land,&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 136</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;“It was so sweet,” he went on, once Podmore had departed, “Gianni, for such was his name, anxiously explained, in one of those divinely dusty Italian voices, that he was afraid he might hurt me. ‘Carissimo,’ I said, ‘I’ll grant you it’s a monster, but after what I’ve been through this last week you’ll be lucky if it touches the sides. It’ll be like a paper boat up the Grand Canal.’ Still, that’s enough of me. You much of a traveller, Bishop?”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 153</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;For all I know, no one in the world has ever been pleased to see me,&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 308</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;One is always hearing a great deal of liberal waffle about the terrible state of the National Health Service. Waiting lists, cuts, low morale: you can’t help but soak up the thrust of the moronic yapping we have to put up with every day from the professionally disenchanted and humourlessly self-righteous wankers of the left. Even a sceptical old reactionary like me is, willy-nilly, influenced by this kind of talk into imagining that all NHS institutions are crowded with desperately sick patients lying about in the corridors on straw palliasses waiting for the health authority’s one overworked, under-rested teenage doctor to come and tell them to pull themselves together. Not a bit of it. Not a bloody bit of it. It may&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 334</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;when Davey and I walked in through the automatic electrically operated doors and reported to the reception desk I felt less like a soldier dragging his wounded comrade into the filthy Crimean field-hospital of popular left-wing imagination and more like Richard Burton checking in to a five-star hotel in Gstaad with a tipsy Elizabeth Taylor on his arm.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 335</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;They call me a cynic and sceptic too, but that’s because when I see a thing I call it what it is, not what I want it to be. If you spend your life on a moral hill-top, you see nothing but the mud below. If, like me, you live in the mud itself, you get a damned good view of clear blue sky and clean green hills above. There’s none so evil-minded as those with a moral mission, and none so pure in heart as the depraved&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 343</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;He is not quite as intelligent as he would like to be, but then which of us is? He is not unintelligent, you understand, he is intelligent enough to glimpse valuable and serious ideas and to be maddened that they are beyond his reach. Because so much that he prizes is out of his intellectual grasp he imagines he can leap at the truth of things by intuition or with the help of some deeper agency, some spirit of nature.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 369</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Davey decided that he had to be as pure and natural as an animal. Pure and natural as a ladybird, of course, not pure and natural as the ladybird’s cousin, the dung-beetle. Pure and natural as a gazelle, not pure and natural as the hyenas that bite into the gazelle’s eyeballs and feast on its intestines. His ideas of purity and naturalness seem to have more in common with a Victorian hymnbook for children than any real understanding of the physical world.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 378</div></div>      </div>
      </div>
        <div class="footer">
    <div class="footer-data"><div class="footer-links"><ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/contact.php" title="">Contact</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/support.php" title="">Support</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/privacy.php" title="">Privacy</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/rights.php" title="">Rights</a></li></ul></div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="copyright">Copyright (c) 1999-2026 earthli.com. All Rights Reserved.</div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="versions">Powered by <ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore/app_news.php">earthli News 3.7</a></li><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore" title="">earthli WebCore&trade; 3.7</a></li></ul></div></div>    </div>
      </div>
  </div>  </body>
</html>
]]>
  </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
      <title type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[Definitely, Maybe by Arkady Strugatsky (1977) (read in 2016)]]>
  </title>
    <id>https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3293</id>
    <link href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3293"/>
    <updated>2016-11-20T21:17:12+01:00</updated>
    <author>
        <name type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[Marco von Ballmoos]]>
  </name>
      <uri>https://earthli.com/users/marco</uri>
    </author>
      <summary type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<blockquote class="quote abstract "><div>Disclaimer: these are notes I took while reading this book. They include citations I found interesting or enlightening or particularly well-written. In some cases, I&rsquo;ve pointed out which of these applies to which citation; in others, I have not. Any benefit you gain from reading these notes is... [<a class="complete-text-link" href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3293">More</a>]</div></blockquote>]]>
  </summary>
      <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<html lang="en">
  <head>
    <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/themes/ice.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/fonts/raleway.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/core/medium.css">
  </head>
  <body>
<div class="style-controls">  <div class="page">
    <div class="page-body">
<div class="info-box-top">
<p>
Published by <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_user.php?name=marco" title="Marco von Ballmoos" class="visible">marco</a> on <span class="date-time">20. Nov 2016 21:17:12 (GMT-5)</span>
</p>
</div>
      <div class="text-flow wide">
  <blockquote class="quote abstract "><div>Disclaimer: these are notes I took while reading this book. They include citations I found interesting or enlightening or particularly well-written. In some cases, I&rsquo;ve pointed out which of these applies to which citation; in others, I have not. Any benefit you gain from reading these notes is purely incidental to the purpose they serve of reminding me what I once read. Please see Wikipedia for a summary if I&rsquo;ve failed to provide one sufficient for your purposes. If my notes serve to trigger an interest in this book, then I&rsquo;m happy for you.</div></blockquote><p>This is the story of a physics researcher, toiling alone on a problem, on the edge of a great discovery. The closer he gets to breaking through, to culminating his research, the more the universe seems to resist him. Distracting visitors drop by, his neighbor turns out to be much more than he&rsquo;d appeared, then is murdered. The murder suspect is the researcher himself, with more visitors dropping in to threaten and cajole. He meets other researchers who, as they swap stories, all realize that they&rsquo;ve been similarly stymied, that they each were gently nudged from their goal by an invisible and inexorable impasse.</p>
<p>In a vein similar to how capital-T Time resists change in <em>11/22/63</em>, Stephen King&rsquo;s novel about the Kennedy assassination, here it is the capital-U Universe that resists the plumbing of its deepest workings. They discover that its possible that the Universe tries to preserve a homeostatic balance between entropy and reasoning ability—not actively, but by a principle similar to Heisenberg&rsquo;s about position and momentum. The cabal of scientists try to wrap their head around this concept and try to work out how they could even possibly continue to research it—or even harness it—if it is true. Because if it&rsquo;s true, then it means that the Universe will resist investigation into proving this principle, by definition.</p>
<h2>Citations</h2><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;“Phil,” Malianov said. “Wait. Don’t you see it either? What the hell kind of supercivilization is this? Some supercivilization that prods us like a blind kitten. Why all this meaningless nonsense? My investigator and the cognac? Zakhar’s women? Where is the fundamental principle of reason: expediency, economy?” “Those are particulars,” Vecherovsky replied softly. “Why measure nonhuman expediency in human terms? And then remember with what force you smack yourself on the cheek to kill a crummy mosquito. A blow like that could easily kill all the mosquitoes in the vicinity.” Weingarten added: “Or, for instance. What is the expediency of building a bridge over a river from the point of view of a trout?”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 1206-1212</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;You say: a united mankind. You see, for your plan, there may be some life-form that could do it, but not ours, not earthlings, I mean. Our people would never believe anything like that. You know when it will believe in a supercivilization? When that supercivilization stoops to our level and starts sprinkling us with bombs from whining spacecraft. Then we’ll believe, then we’ll be united, and even then not right away. We’ll probably wallop each other with a few salvos first.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 1256-1260</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;If it was the Homeostatic Universe quelling a microrebellion, that’s just how it should have seemed. Like a man swatting a fly with a towel—vicious, whistling blows cutting through the air; vases tumbling from shelves; lamps breaking; innocent moths falling victim to the blows; the cat, its paw stomped on, making a beeline for the couch. Massed power and inefficiency.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 1666-1669</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;It’s very unpleasant for a person to realize that he’s not at all what he thought he was. He wants to remain the way he was all his life, and that’s impossible if he capitulates. And so he has to … And yet there’s still a difference. In our century people shoot themselves because they’re ashamed before others—society, friends … In the last century people shot themselves because they were ashamed before themselves. You see, for some reason, in our century, everybody thinks that a person can always come to terms with himself. It’s probably true. I don’t know why. I don’t know what’s going on here. Maybe it’s because the world has become more complicated? Maybe it’s because now there are so many other concepts besides pride and honor that can be used to convince people.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 1973-1980</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The fear, loathing, despair, and feeling of impotence came back, and I realized with unbearable clarity that from that moment a line of fire and brimstone that could never be crossed was drawn between Vecherovsky and me. I would have to stop behind it for the rest of my life, while he went on through the land mines, dust, and mud of battles I would never know and disappeared in the flaming horizon. He and I would nod hello when we ran into each other on the stairs, but I would stay on this side of the line with Weingarten, Zakhar, and Glukhov—drinking tea or beer, or chasing vodka with beer, and gabbing about intrigues and promotions, saving up for a car, and eking out my existence over some dull, official project.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 2038-2043</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;And I also thought that he said: “He knew how to scribble on paper under the candle’s crackle! He had something to die for by the Black River.” And his satisfied guffaws, like Wells’s Martian laughter, rang in my ears.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 2107-2109</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Billion became for BN (and naturally, according to the law of communicating vessels, for AN as well) a novella about the tormenting and essentially hopeless struggle of mankind to preserve the “right of primogeniture” against the dull, blind, persistent force that knows neither honor, nor nobility, nor charity, that knows only one thing—how to achieve its goals, by any means, without any setbacks&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 2145-2148</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;“If you have the guts to be yourself,” as John Updike wrote, “other people’ll pay your price.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 2151-2152</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;And as we all know, there is nothing more pleasurable than recalling unpleasantness that has bypassed us successfully.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 2170-2170</div></div>      </div>
      </div>
        <div class="footer">
    <div class="footer-data"><div class="footer-links"><ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/contact.php" title="">Contact</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/support.php" title="">Support</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/privacy.php" title="">Privacy</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/rights.php" title="">Rights</a></li></ul></div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="copyright">Copyright (c) 1999-2026 earthli.com. All Rights Reserved.</div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="versions">Powered by <ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore/app_news.php">earthli News 3.7</a></li><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore" title="">earthli WebCore&trade; 3.7</a></li></ul></div></div>    </div>
      </div>
  </div>  </body>
</html>
]]>
  </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
      <title type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[We by Yevgeny Zamyatin (1921) (read in 2016)]]>
  </title>
    <id>https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3294</id>
    <link href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3294"/>
    <updated>2016-11-20T21:16:44+01:00</updated>
    <author>
        <name type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[Marco von Ballmoos]]>
  </name>
      <uri>https://earthli.com/users/marco</uri>
    </author>
      <summary type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<blockquote class="quote abstract "><div>Disclaimer: these are notes I took while reading this book. They include citations I found interesting or enlightening or particularly well-written. In some cases, I&rsquo;ve pointed out which of these applies to which citation; in others, I have not. Any benefit you gain from reading these notes is... [<a class="complete-text-link" href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3294">More</a>]</div></blockquote>]]>
  </summary>
      <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<html lang="en">
  <head>
    <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/themes/ice.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/fonts/raleway.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/core/medium.css">
  </head>
  <body>
<div class="style-controls">  <div class="page">
    <div class="page-body">
<div class="info-box-top">
<p>
Published by <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_user.php?name=marco" title="Marco von Ballmoos" class="visible">marco</a> on <span class="date-time">20. Nov 2016 21:16:44 (GMT-5)</span>
</p>
</div>
      <div class="text-flow wide">
  <blockquote class="quote abstract "><div>Disclaimer: these are notes I took while reading this book. They include citations I found interesting or enlightening or particularly well-written. In some cases, I&rsquo;ve pointed out which of these applies to which citation; in others, I have not. Any benefit you gain from reading these notes is purely incidental to the purpose they serve of reminding me what I once read. Please see Wikipedia for a summary if I&rsquo;ve failed to provide one sufficient for your purposes. If my notes serve to trigger an interest in this book, then I&rsquo;m happy for you.</div></blockquote><p>How do I even begin to describe a novel of this breadth and imagination and density of idea and thought? Zamyatin packed in seemingly every single concept he could think of, presaging many other novelists who would come after, not least of whom are Orwell, Huxley, Dick and more. As with those other authors, his novel is set in a dystopian future, in a glass city completely shut off from nature and the non-calculable, the non-rational, the unpredictable, from anything that is not 100% statistically predictable. The lives of the citizens of this city run like clockwork, with no deviations allowed or—for the most part—even attempted.</p>
<p>Each person is assigned a letter and a number, the letter in some ways emotionally evocative of the kind of person, but only in an abstract way. The writing style is at-times florid and descriptive and sumptuous and rich—nearly every paragraph bears re-reading, nearly every sentence feels hand-crafted to contribute to the overarching concept of the book in myriad ways, from the spelling of words to multi-layered allusions to mixing in of wordplay in English and other languages. The translation is, I feel, quite sublime.</p>
<p>We follow the life of D-503, the main designer of the <em>Integral</em>, a majestic spaceship being built to seek the stars after 1000 years of the founding of the One State. We follow his turning from a cog in the machine to a rebel by I-330 and his subsequent falling in love with both her and O-90. As in novels that would follow—like <em>1984</em>—he walks the path to revolution and is then pulled back by the One State through surgery (essentially lobotomy of emotion and imagination). Despite his subjugation, damage is done to the One State and its glass-walled city, nature once again impinging on it, disrupting its clean rationality. The leaders of the revolution are captured and tortured but do not relent, even in death. The revolution will continue, somehow.</p>
<h2>Citations</h2><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Astounding: the extent to which this criminal instinct is deep-rooted&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 33</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Through the glass—foggy and dim—I saw the stupid muzzle of some kind of beast, his yellow eyes, obstinately repeating one and the same incomprehensible thought at me. We looked at each other for a long time, eye to eye, through the mineshafts from the surface world to that other world, beyond the surface. But a thought swarmed in me: what if he, this yellow-eyed being—in his ridiculous, dirty bundle of trees, in his uncalculated life—is happier than us?&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 83</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;I don’t remember where things contracted into darkness but in the darkness we went up steps, endlessly and silently. I didn’t see it but I knew: she walked just like I did—eyes closed, blind, head thrown back, teeth biting lips while listening to the music of my barely audible tremble.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 87</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;But here is the thing: if this world is mine alone, then why is it in these records? Why are these absurd “dreams,” closets, and endless corridors here? It is with regret that I see, instead of an orderly and strict mathematical epic poem in honor of the One State—I see some kind of fantastic adventure novel emerging from me. Ah, if only this was really only some sort of novel, and not this new life of mine: full of X’s, S&rsquo;s, and descents.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 91</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;But it may be that this is for the best. It is highly likely that you, my unknown readers, are mere children in comparison with us (after all, we were bred by the One State, and consequently we have achieved the utmost pinnacle of human potentiality). And, like children, you will only swallow this bitter thing I am giving you if it is thoroughly coated with a thick adventuresome syrup.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 91</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Imagine this: a human finger, cut off from the whole, from the hand—a separate human finger, stooping, bent down, skipping, running along a glass sidewalk. This finger is me. And the strangest, most unnatural thing of all is that the finger doesn’t want to be on the hand, with the others, at all.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 92</div></div><p>Like Gogol&rsquo;s nose.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Before the action began (equals the blast), a dozen ciphers from our hangar were standing around and gaping under the barrel of the engine. Afterward, exactly nothing of them remained, except some crumbs and soot. I write this here with pride because the rhythm of our labor did not falter for even a second because of this—no one even flinched. We and our machines continued our straight-lined and circular movements with the same old precision, as if nothing had happened. A dozen ciphers are barely one hundred millionth part of the mass of the One State and, according to practical calculations, this is infinitely small of the third order. Arithmetically illiterate compassion was only something the Ancients knew; to us, it is amusing.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 95</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Their sentences are also the same: an untimely death. This is the very justice that people who lived in stone houses, lit by the rosy, innocent rays of the morning of history, could only dream about; their “God” punished those who disparaged the Holy Church in exactly the same way as he punished those who committed murder.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 102</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;We departed from zero to the right then we returned to zero from the left, and so: instead of plus zero, we are at minus zero. Do you understand? This zero looks like a silent, colossal, narrow, knife-sharp cliff to me. In the ferocious, shaggy darkness, having held our breath, we cast off from the black, midnight side of the Zero Cliff. For centuries, we sailed and sailed, each of us a Columbus, we rounded the whole circle of the Earth, and finally, hooray! Ahoy and everyone’s up the mast: ahead of us is a different, as yet unknown side of the Zero Cliff, lit up by the aurora polaris of the One State, an azure mass, the sparks of a rainbow, the sun . . . hundreds of suns, billions of rainbows . . .&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 103</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The aero punched through the thicket of air with difficulty; transparent branches whistled and lashed. The city below looked made of pale-blue blocks of ice. All of a sudden, a cloud appears, a quick, slanted shadow. And the ice turns leaden and swollen and, like when standing on the banks of a river in the springtime, you anticipate—any moment now—a cracking, a surging, a twirling, a bolting away.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 104</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The enormous dial at the pinnacle of the Tower was a face: bending over through the clouds and spitting down seconds, waiting indifferently.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 110</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;We walk—one million-headed body—with a humble joy in each of us, similar, I imagine, to what molecules, atoms, and phagocytes experience. The Christians of the ancient world (our only predecessors, as imperfect as they were) also understood this: humility is a virtue and pride is a vice; “WE” is divine, and “I” is satanic.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 112</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;maybe I am one of thousands among us, still pretending, like me, to be phagocytes . . . What if today’s essentially irrelevant occurrence—what if all this is only the beginning, only the first meteorite in a whole series of rumbling, burning rocks, spilling through infinity toward our glass paradise?&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 113</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;And I can see: I forgot again that I am not writing this for myself but for you, my unknowns, whom I love and pity, for you who are still plodding along in distant centuries, below.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 120</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;They say that the Ancients conducted elections in some kind of secrecy, hiding like thieves; several of our historians even confirm that they appeared at the election festivities completely masked. (I imagine this fantastic, gloomy spectacle: nighttime, a square, figures in dark cloaks stealing along a wall; the crimson flame of torches cowering in the wind . . .) Why would all this mystery be necessary? Even today it is not understood conclusively; the likeliest explanation is that elections were connected to some sort of mystical, superstitious, maybe even criminal rites. For us, there is nothing to hide and nothing to be ashamed of: we celebrate election day in the daytime, openly and honestly. I see everyone vote for the Benefactor; everyone sees me vote for the Benefactor—and it couldn’t be any different, since “I” and “everyone” are the unified “WE.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 121</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;And if you even suggest the impossible, that is, that there could be some dissonance in the usual homophony, then the invisible Guardians are here, among our ranks: at any moment, they can stop ciphers who are falling into error and save them from their next false step—and save the One State from them.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 121</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;And I joined Him mentally, to see all this from above: the concentric circles of the tribunal contoured with fine, light-blue dotted lines like the circles of a cobweb strewn with microscopic suns (our shining badges); and the white, wise Spider would now sit at the center of it—the Benefactor, clad in white—who wisely binds us by our hands and feet with His benefactorly threads of happiness.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 123</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Morning. Through the ceiling: the sky has its usual strong, round, and red-cheeked appearance. I think I would have been less surprised if I had seen some unusual quadrilateral sun overhead, people in multicolored clothing made of bestial wool, and opaque stone walls. Could it be that the world—our world—still exists? Or is this just inertia, the generator is turned off but the gears are still rumbling and spinning: two rotations, three rotations, and it will freeze on the fourth . . .&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 130</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;DISTURBANCE WROUGHT BY THE ENEMIES OF HAPPINESS, WHICH, NATURALLY, DEPRIVES THEM OF THE RIGHT TO BECOME BRICKS IN THE FOUNDATIONS OF THE ONE STATE, RENEWED YESTERDAY. IT IS CLEAR TO EACH OF US THAT TAKING THEIR VOICES INTO ACCOUNT WOULD BE AS RIDICULOUS AS TAKING THE ACCIDENTAL COUGHS OF SICK PEOPLE IN A CONCERT AUDIENCE AS A PART OF A MAJESTIC, HEROIC SYMPHONY .&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 131</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Everything is new, new, new—a sort of downpour of events—and one of me is not enough to collect it all. I am stretching out the flaps of my unif and cupping my hands and yet whole bucketfuls still flow past me, and only drops end up on these pages . . .&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 140</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;“But we—we know, meanwhile, that there is no final number. Though we might forget it too. Yes—it’s highly probable that we will forget it when we grow older—and everyone inevitably grows older. And then, unavoidably, down we will go like autumn leaves from a tree . . .&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 154</div></div><p>Just like every other successful revolution.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;BUT IT IS NOT YOUR FAULT: YOU ARE SICK. THE NAME OF THIS SICKNESS: IMAGINATION. THIS IS THE WORM THAT GNAWS BLACK WRINKLES ONTO YOUR FOREHEAD. THIS IS THE FEVER THAT CHASES YOU, AND YOU RUN OFF INTO THE DISTANCE EVEN THOUGH THIS “DISTANCE” BEGINS WHERE HAPPINESS ENDS. IT IS THE LAST BARRICADE ON THE PATH TO HAPPINESS.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 157</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;[…] see the transparent, living cranes bending their swanlike necks, stretching out their beaks, thoughtfully and tenderly feeding the Integral with scary explosive food for its engine.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 164</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;On the corner, the door of an auditorium was wide open and a slow, bulky column of about fifty people was coming through it. But “people” is not quite right: there were no feet to them but some kind of heavy forged wheel being turned by an invisible axle. They weren’t people but sort of person-looking tractors. Above their heads, flapping in the wind was a white flag, with a golden sun sewn onto it, and in its rays was the inscription: “We are the first! We have been Operated! Everyone follow us!”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 166</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The bridge offered up its obedient, slavishly bowed-over spine to the three of us: […]&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 168</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;A second later everything below is tightening up and falling deeper and deeper into some sort of funnel: the protuberant, icy-blue sketch of the city, the round little bubbles of the cupolas, the lonely lead finger of the Accumulator Tower. Then: a fleeting wadded curtain of clouds. We break through and then: sun, blue sky. Seconds, minutes, miles and the blueness quickly hardens, filling with darkness, and stars come through like drops of cold, silver sweat . .&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 174</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Over the instruments and the maps: heads, circumnavigated with bristling gray, and other heads, yellow, bald, ripe. Quickly, I scooped up everyone—in one glance—and went backward, along the corridor, along the gangway, downstairs to the engine room. There: the heat and the din from the scorching, blasting pipes; the reckless, drunken, never-pausing squats of the glittering cranks; and the dials trembling just slightly . . .&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 175</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;There you will be healed, there you will be fed full of sumptuous happiness, and once you’re satiated, you will slumber evenly and snore to an organized beat—can you not hear this great symphony of snores? You funny ciphers: they want to liberate you of the torturously gnawing question marks that wriggle like worms . . . But you’re standing here and listening to me instead. Go quickly—upstairs—to the Great Operation! What does it matter to you that I stay here alone? What does it matter to you if I don’t want them to want things for me—if I want to want things for myself—if I want the impossible . . . ?”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 182</div></div>      </div>
      </div>
        <div class="footer">
    <div class="footer-data"><div class="footer-links"><ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/contact.php" title="">Contact</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/support.php" title="">Support</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/privacy.php" title="">Privacy</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/rights.php" title="">Rights</a></li></ul></div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="copyright">Copyright (c) 1999-2026 earthli.com. All Rights Reserved.</div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="versions">Powered by <ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore/app_news.php">earthli News 3.7</a></li><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore" title="">earthli WebCore&trade; 3.7</a></li></ul></div></div>    </div>
      </div>
  </div>  </body>
</html>
]]>
  </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
      <title type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[One Human Minute by Stanislaw Lem (1971--1986) (read in 2016)]]>
  </title>
    <id>https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3309</id>
    <link href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3309"/>
    <updated>2016-11-20T21:14:01+01:00</updated>
    <author>
        <name type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[Marco von Ballmoos]]>
  </name>
      <uri>https://earthli.com/users/marco</uri>
    </author>
      <summary type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<blockquote class="quote abstract "><div>Disclaimer: these are notes I took while reading this book. They include citations I found interesting or enlightening or particularly well-written. In some cases, I&rsquo;ve pointed out which of these applies to which citation; in others, I have not. Any benefit you gain from reading these notes is... [<a class="complete-text-link" href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3309">More</a>]</div></blockquote>]]>
  </summary>
      <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<html lang="en">
  <head>
    <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/themes/ice.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/fonts/raleway.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/core/medium.css">
  </head>
  <body>
<div class="style-controls">  <div class="page">
    <div class="page-body">
<div class="info-box-top">
<p>
Published by <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_user.php?name=marco" title="Marco von Ballmoos" class="visible">marco</a> on <span class="date-time">20. Nov 2016 21:14:01 (GMT-5)</span>
</p>
</div>
      <div class="text-flow wide">
  <blockquote class="quote abstract "><div>Disclaimer: these are notes I took while reading this book. They include citations I found interesting or enlightening or particularly well-written. In some cases, I&rsquo;ve pointed out which of these applies to which citation; in others, I have not. Any benefit you gain from reading these notes is purely incidental to the purpose they serve of reminding me what I once read. Please see Wikipedia for a summary if I&rsquo;ve failed to provide one sufficient for your purposes. If my notes serve to trigger an interest in this book, then I&rsquo;m happy for you.</div></blockquote><p>This is a short book containing three stories.</p>
<p>The first is a fake review of a non-existent book called <em>One Human Minute</em>. The book purports to give an impression of what occurs on Earth each minute by compiling meticulous statistics about every conceivable facet of human life. E.g. the number of deaths of various kinds, the number of births, copulations, illnesses, etc. He actually reviews several editions of this book, each of which extends the concept of the original.</p>
<p>The second is a foretelling of the development of 21st-century weapons, told as a history. This sounds contradictory, but actually works quite well. His idea is that the battlefield will be increasingly automated and miniaturized until the &ldquo;war&rdquo; moves entirely out of human hands and into the purely virtual. He&rsquo;s not far wrong, actually, so far. All signs point to his predictions coming true.</p>
<p>The third is an interesting foray into cosmology, a discussion of how much luck had to do with the formation of life on Earth and the possible answers this provides to Fermi&rsquo;s purported paradox. The notion of how the inexorable rotation of the galactic spiral arms were timed perfectly with the cycles of life on Earth is a tempting explanation and entirely plausible, at least the way he presents it as a &ldquo;fake&rdquo; scientist.</p>
<p>All three books were, as ever with Lem, very interesting and engaging and well-worth reading. He&rsquo;s never predictable.</p>
<h2>Citations</h2><p>The following citations pertain to the review of <em>One Human Minute</em>, the book that details everything that happens in one minute on planet Earth. It is all seasons at once and there is an overwhelming amount of distraction and delight in a world where everything global is available locally—an apt description of our Internet Age, made well before its time.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Because advertising, with monstrous effectiveness, attributes perfection to everything—and so to books, to every book—a person is beguiled by twenty thousand Miss Universes at once and, unable to decide, lingers unfulfilled in amorous readiness like a sheep in a stupor. So it is with everything. Cable television, broadcasting forty programs at once, produces in the viewer the feeling that, since there are so many, others must be better than the one he has on, <strong>so he jumps from program to program like a flea on a hot stove, proof that technological progress produces new heights of frustration.</strong> (Emphasis added.)&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 46-50</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;There had to be a book, then, about what Everybody Else was doing, so that we would be tormented no longer by the doubt that we were reading nonsense while the Important Things were taking place Elsewhere.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 53-55</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;While it is untrue that there is no such thing as mental illness, that it was invented by psychiatrists to torment their patients and squeeze money out of them, it is true that normal people do far madder things than the insane.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 57-59</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;You may feel indignation, you may take it as an affront to the entire human race, aimed so skillfully that it is irrefutable, containing nothing but verified facts; you may console yourself that at least no one can possibly make a film or a television series out of it—but it will definitely be worthwhile to think about it, though your conclusions will not be pleasant.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 74-77</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;You can have sympathy for one person, possibly for four, but eight hundred thousand is impossible The numbers that we employ in such circumstances are cunning artificial limbs. They are like the cane a blind man uses; tapping the sidewalk keeps him from bumping into a wall, but no one will claim that with this cane he sees the whole richness of the world, or even the small fragment of it on his own street.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 120-123</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Games of this sort with statistics can rightly be called cheap. They may be meant as a reminder that we—who with the might of our industry poisoned the air, the soil, the seas, who turned jungles into deserts, who exterminated countless species of animals and plants that had lived for hundreds of millions of years, who reached other planets, and who altered even the albedo of the Earth, thereby revealing our presence to cosmic observers—could disappear so easily and without a trace.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 200-203</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;There is something mechanical about this, inexorable, and animallike. How can one come to terms with an image of humanity copulating relentlessly through all the cataclysms that befall it, or that it has brought upon itself?&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 229-230</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Does this book truly show all of humanity? The statistical tables are a keyhole, and the reader, a Peeping Tom, spies on the huge naked body of humanity busy about its everyday affairs. But through a keyhole not everything can be seen at once.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 247-249</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;It is as if someone were to try to measure the heat of passion with a thermometer, or to put, under the heading “Acts,&ldquo; both sex acts and acts of faith.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 265-266</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Dostoevsky feared in his Notes from Underground. Dostoevsky believed that we were threatened by scientifically proven determinism, which would toss the sovereignty of the individual—with its free will—onto the garbage heap when science became capable of predicting every decision and every emotion like the movements of a mechanical switch. He saw no alternative, no escape from the cruel predictability that would deprive us of our freedom, except madness His Underground Man was prepared to lose his mind, so that, released by madness, it would not succumb to triumphant determinism.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 277-282</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;yet). This introduction claims an important role for One Human Minute and its imitators: to supply the complete truth. The original One Human Minute is supposed to be computerized, so that one can call it up on one&rsquo;s home computer But most people will prefer the volume on the shelf. And&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 502-504</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;And so the book, styling itself &ldquo;all books in one,” will increase the mass of printed paper In it you can find out how many trees fall per minute to saw and ax all over the world. Forests are turned into paper to make newspapers that call for the forests to be saved. But that piece of information is not in One Human Minute.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 504-506</div></div><p>The next set of citations are for the second book, the reverse military history of the 21st century.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;From a military standpoint it was wasteful, because at ground zero all objects turned into flaming plasma, a gas of atoms stripped of their electron shells. At the site of the explosion, stones, trees, houses, metals, bridges, and human bodies vaporized, and concrete and sand were hurled into the stratosphere in a rising mushroom of flames.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 653-655</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The competition between old and new weapons was brief: massive, armored equipment could not withstand the attacks of the microarmies Just as germs invisibly invade an organism to kill it from within, so the nonliving, artificial microbes, following the tropisms built into them, penetrated the gun barrels, cartridge chambers, tank and plane engines. They corroded the metal catalytically, or, reaching the powder charges or fuel tanks, blew them up. What could even the bravest soldier, carrying grenades, a machine gun, a bazooka, or any other firearm, do against a nonliving, microscopic enemy? He would be like a doctor trying to fight the bacteria of cholera with a hammer or a revolver.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 818-823</div></div><p>An interesting metaphor for the asymmetrical warfare we see today, from guerrilla to cyber.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Every political party had its experts But the advisers of the different parties said completely different things With time, computer systems were brought in to help; too late, people realized they were becoming the mouthpieces of their computers. They thought they were the ones doing the reasoning, drawing independent conclusions based on data supplied by computer memory; but in fact they were operating with material preprocessed by the computer centers, and that material was determining human decisions.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 891-895</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Acid rain had been known in the twentieth century But now there were rains so corrosive that they destroyed roads, power lines, and factory roofs, and it was impossible to determine whether they were caused by pollution or by enemy sabotage. It was that way with everything. Livestock were stricken, but was the disease natural or artificial? The hurricane that ravaged the coast—was it a chance thing, or was it engineered by an invisible swarm of micrometeorological agents, each as small as a virus, covertly diverting ocean air masses? Was the drought natural—however murderous—or was it, too, caused by a skillful diversion of the rain clouds?&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 916-920</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Blurred, also, was the distinction between real and spurious hostilities In order to turn its people against another nation, a country would produce on its own territory “natural” catastrophes so obviously artificial that its citizens were bound to believe the charge that the enemy was responsible. When it came out that a certain large and wealthy nation, in offering aid to those that were underdeveloped and overpopulated, supplemented the provisions it sold (cheaply) of sago, wheat, corn, and potato flour with a drug that diminished sexual potency, the Third World became enraged. This was now an undercover, antinatural war.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 931-935</div></div><p>This last set of citations about from the third book about cosmological musings.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;And there were hypotheses about the self-destructiveness of intelligence—such as von Höorner&rsquo;s, which connected the psychozoic &ldquo;density&rdquo; of the Universe with its barrenness, claiming that suicide threatened every civilization, as nuclear war was now threatening humanity. The organic evolution of life took billions of years, but its final, technological phase lasted barely a few dozen centuries. Other hypotheses pointed to the dangers that the twentieth century encountered even in the peaceful expansion of technology, whose side effects devastated the reproductive capacities of the biosphere.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 981-986</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;He certainly did not conceive such devices in any concrete way; but we, reading his words today, not only know that they have come true but also expand their meaning with a multitude of details familiar to us, which only adds weight to his statements.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 990-992</div></div><p>That is <em>literally</em> what I just did with the previous citation.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;It is even more difficult to foresee what will become of our system when it leaves the calm space that stretches between Perseus and Sagittarius, between the stellar clouds of the two galactic arms. Assuming that the difference between the speed of the Sun and the spiral equals one kilometer per second, we shall reach the next spiral in five hundred million years.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 1165-1167</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The key question in re-creating the history of the solar system and life on Earth is: Did something happen on the order of simple bottle-breaking, which could be put into statistics, or was it, instead, something like the football and the aquarium?&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 1199-1201</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Phenomena that are statistically calculable do not become statistically incalculable suddenly, at a well-defined boundary, but, rather, by degrees The scholar takes a position of cognitive optimism, that is, he assumes that the subjects he studies will yield to calculation It is nicest if they do so deterministically: the angle of incidence is equal to the angle of reflection, a body immersed in water loses exactly as much of its weight as the weight of the water it displaces, and so on It is not quite so nice if calculable probability has to substitute for certainty But it is not nice at all when absolutely nothing can be calculated&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 1201-1205</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Even in the tale of the bottle and the football there is no chaos. Every event, taken separately, obeys the laws of physics, and of deterministic physics, not quantum physics, because we can measure the force with which the child kicked the ball, the angle of impact between bottle and ball, the speed of both bodies at that instant, the path the bottle described when it bounced off the ball, and the speed with which it fell into the aquarium and filled with water Each step of the sequence, taken separately, is subject to mechanics and statistics, but the sequence itself is not (that is, one cannot establish how often a thing that has happened will happen).&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 1207-1211</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The initial states have to be brought into the theory from the outside It is obvious, however, that when some initial state must be achieved precisely by chance in order to produce the initial state of the next occurrence, also precisely defined, and so on, then a certainty that transcends the realm of probabilities becomes an unknown, about which nothing can be said except that &ldquo;something very unusual took place.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 1212-1215</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;To the question &ldquo;How often does what happened with the Sun and the Earth happen in the Universe?&rdquo; there is no answer yet, because we are not sure in which category of events to place the case.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 1216-1217</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;This factor reduces the enigma of the initial state of the Universe to an argument ad hominem: if conditions had been very different, the question would not have arisen, since there would have been no one to ask it.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 1241-1243</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The similarity of my speculations to the theories that appeared later gives me courage to speculate further.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 1263-1264</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Faith as well as science endowed the visible world with properties that eliminated blind, incalculable chance as the author of all events. The war of good and evil present in all religions does not always end, in every faith, with the victory of good, but in every one it establishes a clear order of existence. The sacred as well as the profane rest on that universal order Thus, chance, the ultimate arbiter of existence, was not present in any of the beliefs of the past.* Science, too, long resisted acknowledging the creative and incalculable role of chance in the shaping of reality.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 1369-1373</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Culture exists and has always existed in order to make every accident, every kind of arbitrariness, appear in a benevolent or at least necessary light The common denominator of all cultures, the source of ritual, of all commandments, of every taboo, is this: for everything there is one and only one measure.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 1380-1382</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The huge clouds of dark, cold gases circling in the arms of galaxies are slowly undergoing fragmentation into parts as unpredictable as shattered glass The laws of Nature act not in spite of random events but through them. The statistical fury of the stars, a billion times aborting in order to give birth once to life, a life slain by a chance catastrophe in millions of its species in order to yield intelligence once—this is the rule, not the exception, in the Universe.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 1389-1393</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The history of science shows that each picture of the world, in turn, was thought to be the last; then it was revised, only to crumble eventually like the pattern of a broken mosaic, and the labor of putting it together was taken up anew by the next generation.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 1405-1407</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;It may be that someday a deus ex machina will cope with these inhuman, overcomplicated measurements, inaccessible to our poor animal brains: an alienated, human-initiated machine intelligence—or, rather, the product, pretermechani-cal, of a human-launched evolution of synthetic mind. But here I overstep the twenty-first century into a darkness that no speculation can illumine.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 1416-1419</div></div>      </div>
      </div>
        <div class="footer">
    <div class="footer-data"><div class="footer-links"><ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/contact.php" title="">Contact</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/support.php" title="">Support</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/privacy.php" title="">Privacy</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/rights.php" title="">Rights</a></li></ul></div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="copyright">Copyright (c) 1999-2026 earthli.com. All Rights Reserved.</div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="versions">Powered by <ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore/app_news.php">earthli News 3.7</a></li><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore" title="">earthli WebCore&trade; 3.7</a></li></ul></div></div>    </div>
      </div>
  </div>  </body>
</html>
]]>
  </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
      <title type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[Finders, Keepers by Stephen King (2015) (read in 2016]]>
  </title>
    <id>https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3290</id>
    <link href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3290"/>
    <updated>2016-11-20T21:10:02+01:00</updated>
    <author>
        <name type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[Marco von Ballmoos]]>
  </name>
      <uri>https://earthli.com/users/marco</uri>
    </author>
      <summary type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<blockquote class="quote abstract "><div>Disclaimer: these are notes I took while reading this book. They include citations I found interesting or enlightening or particularly well-written. In some cases, I&rsquo;ve pointed out which of these applies to which citation; in others, I have not. Any benefit you gain from reading these notes is... [<a class="complete-text-link" href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3290">More</a>]</div></blockquote>]]>
  </summary>
      <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<html lang="en">
  <head>
    <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/themes/ice.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/fonts/raleway.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/core/medium.css">
  </head>
  <body>
<div class="style-controls">  <div class="page">
    <div class="page-body">
<div class="info-box-top">
<p>
Published by <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_user.php?name=marco" title="Marco von Ballmoos" class="visible">marco</a> on <span class="date-time">20. Nov 2016 21:10:02 (GMT-5)</span>
</p>
</div>
      <div class="text-flow wide">
  <blockquote class="quote abstract "><div>Disclaimer: these are notes I took while reading this book. They include citations I found interesting or enlightening or particularly well-written. In some cases, I&rsquo;ve pointed out which of these applies to which citation; in others, I have not. Any benefit you gain from reading these notes is purely incidental to the purpose they serve of reminding me what I once read. Please see Wikipedia for a summary if I&rsquo;ve failed to provide one sufficient for your purposes. If my notes serve to trigger an interest in this book, then I&rsquo;m happy for you.</div></blockquote><p>This is the sequel to <em>Mr. Mercedes</em>, reuniting the trio of detectives that formed at the end of that book: Holly, Jerome and Bill Hodges. They are a fun team to watch, typically interesting King characters. The story is good but feels a bit too well-oiled, especially if you&rsquo;ve read a lot of Stephen King books. You know where it&rsquo;s going and how it&rsquo;s going to end. The bits of foreshadowing with Brady are eerie and quite well-done—much more like his best of old.</p>
<p>This story follows (yet another) avid fan (Morris) of a noir-mystery writer (think Roth and Updike with a bit of the reclusive Salinger) who feels betrayed by how his hero&rsquo;s character was made to end. He&rsquo;s such an avid fan that he breaks into the writer&rsquo;s home with two cohorts in order to rob him of supposedly large amounts of cash. He discovers a final novel with his hero in it, unpublished for decades. Enraged, he kills the writer for the multiple betrayals of this fictional hero, getting away with the crime and stashing the novel away where he can read it in peace. Before he can read a single page, though, he goes on a bender and rapes a girl. He is caught and sentenced to decades in prison.</p>
<p>Fast-forward twenty years (or so) and Pete, a young guy in his last year of high school, discovers the book hidden in a trunk. He, too, is an avid fan of the writer and immediately recognizes the book for what it is. He also makes good use of the money stashed with the book to anonymously get his family through tough times. As you would expect, Morris is eventually paroled and comes looking for his book and his money, both of which are gone. He quickly ascertains what happened and pursues Pete. The detective trio are hot on his trail, trying to save Pete and solve the mystery.</p>
<h2>Citations</h2><p>Mr. Ricker is the inspiring English teacher.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;I am required to teach certain antiquities I would rather not teach. I see the loss of enthusiasm in your eyes, and my soul groans. Yes! <em>Groans!</em> But I soldier on, because I know that much of what I teach is <em>not</em> stupid. Even some of the antiquities to which you feel you cannot relate now or ever will, have deep resonance that will eventually reveal itself. Shall I tell&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 117 by <cite>Mr. Ricker</cite></div></div>      </div>
      </div>
        <div class="footer">
    <div class="footer-data"><div class="footer-links"><ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/contact.php" title="">Contact</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/support.php" title="">Support</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/privacy.php" title="">Privacy</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/rights.php" title="">Rights</a></li></ul></div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="copyright">Copyright (c) 1999-2026 earthli.com. All Rights Reserved.</div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="versions">Powered by <ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore/app_news.php">earthli News 3.7</a></li><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore" title="">earthli WebCore&trade; 3.7</a></li></ul></div></div>    </div>
      </div>
  </div>  </body>
</html>
]]>
  </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
      <title type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[Gulliver's Travels by Jonathan Swift (1726) (read in 2016)]]>
  </title>
    <id>https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3259</id>
    <link href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3259"/>
    <updated>2016-05-08T21:56:19+02:00</updated>
    <author>
        <name type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[Marco von Ballmoos]]>
  </name>
      <uri>https://earthli.com/users/marco</uri>
    </author>
      <summary type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<blockquote class="quote abstract "><div>Disclaimer: these are notes I took while reading this book. They include citations I found interesting or enlightening or particularly well-written. In some cases, I&rsquo;ve pointed out which of these applies to which citation; in others, I have not. Any benefit you gain from reading these notes is... [<a class="complete-text-link" href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3259">More</a>]</div></blockquote>]]>
  </summary>
      <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<html lang="en">
  <head>
    <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/themes/ice.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/fonts/raleway.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/core/medium.css">
  </head>
  <body>
<div class="style-controls">  <div class="page">
    <div class="page-body">
<div class="info-box-top">
<p>
Published by <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_user.php?name=marco" title="Marco von Ballmoos" class="visible">marco</a> on <span class="date-time">8. May 2016 21:56:19 (GMT-5)</span>
</p>
<p>
Updated by <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_user.php?name=marco" title="Marco von Ballmoos" class="visible">marco</a> on <span class="date-time">15. Jun 2016 09:14:30 (GMT-5)</span>
</p>
</div>
      <div class="text-flow wide">
  <blockquote class="quote abstract "><div>Disclaimer: these are notes I took while reading this book. They include citations I found interesting or enlightening or particularly well-written. In some cases, I&rsquo;ve pointed out which of these applies to which citation; in others, I have not. Any benefit you gain from reading these notes is purely incidental to the purpose they serve of reminding me what I once read. Please see Wikipedia for a summary if I&rsquo;ve failed to provide one sufficient for your purposes. If my notes serve to trigger an interest in this book, then I&rsquo;m happy for you.</div></blockquote><p>This tale follows the life of gentleman adventurer Gulliver along several ocean voyages, each of which ends in shipwreck. The first takes him to Lilliput, where he is much, much bigger than everyone else. He describes his nine months there as he quickly learns their language and ingratiates himself to the emperor. He returns home with adequate riches in the form of miniature livestock that he sells to finance the family he left behind. </p>
<p>Soon after, he is on a boat again, stranding himself somewhere in the Pacific, on a large heretofore undiscovered continent in the Pacific Ocean called Brobdignag. On this continent, the residents are as much bigger than he as he was bigger than the Lilliputians. He tells of his rather mundane adventures there, but be assured that here, too, he befriends royalty and plants himself firmly at the top of the Brobdingnagian food-chain. He is swept off this continent by circumstance (and a bird) and is once again rescued on the open ocean.</p>
<p>This most unfortunate of sailors is somehow taken up on another crew. This ship is attacked by pirates and Gulliver is stranded near idea. He is picked up by the flying island of Laputa, which is composed nearly entirely of adamant and has an adamant mechanism to guide its motion. After spending some time among the royalty there, he becomes bored and wants to visit the lands below, named Balnibarbi. Again, Gulliver is feted by all and invited everywhere important. In the great university of Lagado he finds the reason the country is so dilapidated: the entirety of the people&rsquo;s efforts have been perverted into non-rational and non-scientific pursuits that have no hope of accomplishing anything useful. There are only a few holdouts, whose homes and lands look normal and seem productive to Gulliver. A final side trip to Glubbdubdrib has him communing with the ghosts of all of the celebrities of the ages, thanks to the help of a great sorcerer. Gulliver again benefits from tremendous powers without any reason as to why he is singled out for the privilege.</p>
<p>After once again returning home to his wife and children—who must be teenagers by now—he cannot stay put and takes advantage of an offer to captain his own vessel. This is a capital idea if you want to commit insurance fraud, as the vessel is almost certain to capsize or otherwise fail to reach its destination with Gulliver aboard. It turns out that, this time, Gulliver&rsquo;s crew is less than honorable and they hire criminals to replace expired members until he has no more control and they trap him in his cabin. After weeks, they resolve to rid themselves of him in a small dinghy. He of course fetches up on yet another previously undiscovered land, this one populated by Yahoos and Houyhnhnms. The Yahoos are life extremely vile humans with no civilizing characteristics. The Houyhnhnms are horses with pure rationality and no strife and perfect in every way. Gulliver, of course, lives with the Houyhnhnms, even though he looks just like a Yahoo, which they keep as work animals. He spends years with them, learning their language and their ways and resolving to never return to the debased culture whence he came. Alas, the Houyhnhnms decide to get rid of him because they cannot abide a Yahoo in their midst. He builds himself a canoe and—lo and behold—is rescued by a Portuguese ship. He is of two minds: he wants to be rescued, but he doesn&rsquo;t want to spend any time in the company of Yahoos. He doesn&rsquo;t even want to return to civilization, really. He abhors everything about his own kind and can no longer abide even the smell of them. This applies even to his family once he is returned to England, where he lives out the rest of his days as a recluse, unable to reintegrate with the Yahoos.</p>
<h2>Citations</h2><p>Swift pins his own ideas about the shortcomings of British culture on the frame of these fantastic tales. Here he points out that the legal system is somewhat unnecessarily focused only on the penalties rather than rewards.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;And these people thought it a prodigious defect of policy among us, when I told them that our laws were enforced only by penalties, without any mention of reward.  It is upon this account that the image of Justice, in their courts of judicature, is formed with six eyes, two before, as many behind, and on each side one, to signify circumspection; with a bag of gold open in her right hand, and a sword sheathed in her left, to show she is more disposed to reward than to punish.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 46</div></div><p>This next part is also relatively advanced philosophical thinking about the burden imposed on a child by bringing it into the world.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;[…] for which reason they will never allow that a child is under any obligation to his father for begetting him, or to his mother for bringing him into the world; which, considering the miseries of human life, was neither a benefit in itself, nor intended so by his parents, whose thoughts, in their love encounters, were otherwise employed.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 48</div></div><p>OK, so I can&rsquo;t tell if Swift is being sarcastic in the next citation. I&rsquo;m hoping yes, but cannot assume that Swift had an advanced attitude toward suffrage and equal rights.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;[…] for their maxim is, that among peoples of quality, a wife should be always a reasonable and agreeable companion, because she cannot always be young.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 50</div></div><p>With tongue planted firmly in cheek, Swift tells of how Gulliver is being unreasonable when he considers the emperor&rsquo;s punishment to be unfair.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;That if his majesty, in consideration of your services, and pursuant to his own merciful disposition, would please to spare your life, and only give orders to put out both your eyes, he humbly conceived, that by this expedient justice might in some measure be satisfied, and all the world would applaud the lenity of the emperor, as well as the fair and generous proceedings of those who have the honour to be his counsellors.  That the loss of your eyes would be no impediment to your bodily strength, by which you might still be useful to his majesty; that blindness is an addition to courage, by concealing dangers from us; that the fear you had for your eyes, was the greatest difficulty in bringing over the enemy’s fleet, and it would be sufficient for you to see by the eyes of the ministers, since the greatest princes do no more.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 57</div></div><p>Jesus. Sarcastic much?</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Yet, as to myself, I must confess, having never been designed for a courtier, either by my birth or education, I was so ill a judge of things, that I could not discover the lenity and favour of this sentence, but conceived it (perhaps erroneously) rather to be rigorous than gentle.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 59</div></div><p>Swift uses the Emperor&rsquo;s speech to express what are probably his own ideas about the debauched nature of English politics and law.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>“My little friend Grildrig, you have made a most admirable panegyric upon your country; you have clearly proved, that ignorance, idleness, and vice, are the proper ingredients for qualifying a legislator; that laws are best explained, interpreted, and applied, by those whose interest and abilities lie in perverting, confounding, and eluding them.  I observe among you some lines of an institution, which, in its original, might have been tolerable, but these half erased, and the rest wholly blurred and blotted by corruptions.</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 115</div></div><p>I don&rsquo;t know how to interpret this passage. Is it a fabulous cautionary tale intended to keep people on the island? Is the author retelling or is he credulous? I feel that this is another tongue-in-cheek telling of how the lady is just too flighty to see how much better it is in Laputa, even though it totally sucks.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;I was told that a great court lady, who had several children,—is married to the prime minister, the richest subject in the kingdom, a very graceful person, extremely fond of her, and lives in the finest palace of the island,—went down to Lagado on the pretence of health, there hid herself for several months, till the king sent a warrant to search for her; and she was found in an obscure eating-house all in rags, having pawned her clothes to maintain an old deformed footman, who beat her every day, and in whose company she was taken, much against her will.  And although her husband received her with all possible kindness, and without the least reproach, she soon after contrived to steal down again, with all her jewels, to the same gallant, and has not been heard of since.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 145</div></div><p>More sarcastic ideas of how to fix society.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Wit, valour, and politeness, were likewise proposed to be largely taxed, and collected in the same manner, by every person’s giving his own word for the quantum of what he possessed.  But as to honour, justice, wisdom, and learning, they should not be taxed at all; because they are qualifications of so singular a kind, that no man will either allow them in his neighbour or value them in himself. The women were proposed to be taxed according to their beauty and skill in dressing, wherein they had the same privilege with the men, to be determined by their own judgment.  But constancy, chastity, good sense, and good nature, were not rated, because they would not bear the charge of collecting.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 166</div></div><p>This next piece is about the immortals (struldbrugs) found in one of the civilizations. After Gulliver goes on at length about how awesome it would be to be immortal, the natives must regretfully inform him that, while a few citizens live forever, they go very seriously downhill once they hit eighty—they just don&rsquo;t die.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;At ninety, they lose their teeth and hair; they have at that age no distinction of taste, but eat and drink whatever they can get, without relish or appetite.  The diseases they were subject to still continue, without increasing or diminishing.  In talking, they forget the common appellation of things, and the names of persons, even of those who are their nearest friends and relations.  For the same reason, they never can amuse themselves with reading, because their memory will not serve to carry them from the beginning of a sentence to the end; and by this defect, they are deprived of the only entertainment whereof they might otherwise be capable.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 188</div></div><p>This next observation about how immortals would be unable to understand subsequent generations is quite prescient. This actually applies even to generations without a normal lifespan, especially with the increased rate of cultural change in the 20th and 21st centuries.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The language of this country being always upon the flux, the struldbrugs of one age do not understand those of another; neither are they able, after two hundred years, to hold any conversation (farther than by a few general words) with their neighbours the mortals; and thus they lie under the disadvantage of living like foreigners in their own country.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 188</div></div><p>On the final island, the horses are in charge of the humans. When Gulliver describes how humans and horses live together in his world, the horse ruler on the island nods sagely and comes to the conclusion that the horses rule in Gulliver&rsquo;s world as well (the same conclusion to which a dog would come when it heard how modern humans live with dogs—the dogs are clearly in charge).</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;When I asserted that the Yahoos were the only governing animals in my country, which my master said was altogether past his conception, he desired to know, “whether we had Houyhnhnms among us, and what was their employment?”  I told him, “we had great numbers; that in summer they grazed in the fields, and in winter were kept in houses with hay and oats, where Yahoo servants were employed to rub their skins smooth, comb their manes, pick their feet, serve them with food, and make their beds.”  “I understand you well,” said my master: “it is now very plain, from all you have spoken, that whatever share of reason the Yahoos pretend to, the Houyhnhnms are your masters; I heartily wish our Yahoos would be so tractable.” &rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 211</div></div><p>The reasons for war and strife that Swift lists are wholly and entirely unchanged even almost 300 years later (next two passages).</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;He asked me, “what were the usual causes or motives that made one country go to war with another?”  I answered “they were innumerable; but I should only mention a few of the chief.  Sometimes the ambition of princes, who never think they have land or people enough to govern; sometimes the corruption of ministers, who engage their master in a war, in order to stifle or divert the clamour of the subjects against their evil administration.  Difference in opinions has cost many millions of lives: for instance, whether flesh be bread, or bread be flesh; whether the juice of a certain berry be blood or wine; whether whistling be a vice or a virtue; whether it be better to kiss a post, or throw it into the fire; what is the best colour for a coat, whether black, white, red, or gray; and whether it should be long or short, narrow or wide, dirty or clean; with many more.  Neither are any wars so furious and bloody, or of so long a continuance, as those occasioned by difference in opinion, especially if it be in things indifferent.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 216</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;“Sometimes the quarrel between two princes is to decide which of them shall dispossess a third of his dominions, where neither of them pretend to any right.  Sometimes one prince quarrels with another for fear the other should quarrel with him.  Sometimes a war is entered upon, because the enemy is too strong; and sometimes, because he is too weak.  Sometimes our neighbours want the things which we have, or have the things which we want, and we both fight, till they take ours, or give us theirs.  It is a very justifiable cause of a war, to invade a country after the people have been wasted by famine, destroyed by pestilence, or embroiled by factions among themselves.  It is justifiable to enter into war against our nearest ally, when one of his towns lies convenient for us, or a territory of land, that would render our dominions round and complete. &rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 217</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;For these reasons, the trade of a soldier is held the most honourable of all others; because a soldier is a Yahoo hired to kill, in cold blood, as many of his own species, who have never offended him, as possibly he can.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 217</div></div><p>Swift <em>really</em> doesn&rsquo;t like lawyers. This situation seems unchanged over 300 years, as well.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;[…] there was a society of men among us, bred up from their youth in the art of proving, by words multiplied for the purpose, that white is black, and black is white, according as they are paid.  To this society all the rest of the people are slaves.  For example, if my neighbour has a mind to my cow, he has a lawyer to prove that he ought to have my cow from me.  I must then hire another to defend my right, it being against all rules of law that any man should be allowed to speak for himself.  Now, in this case, I, who am the right owner, lie under two great disadvantages: first, my lawyer, being practised almost from his cradle in defending falsehood, is quite out of his element when he would be an advocate for justice, which is an unnatural office he always attempts with great awkwardness, if not with ill-will.  The second disadvantage is, that my lawyer must proceed with great caution, or else he will be reprimanded by the judges, and abhorred by his brethren, as one that would lessen the practice of the law. &rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 219</div></div><p>His description of precedent law is also quite entertaining.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;It is a maxim among these lawyers that whatever has been done before, may legally be done again: and therefore they take special care to record all the decisions formerly made against common justice, and the general reason of mankind.  These, under the name of precedents, they produce as authorities to justify the most iniquitous opinions; and the judges never fail of directing accordingly.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 220</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;It is likewise to be observed, that this society has a peculiar cant and jargon of their own, that no other mortal can understand, and wherein all their laws are written, which they take special care to multiply; whereby they have wholly confounded the very essence of truth and falsehood, of right and wrong; so that it will take thirty years to decide, whether the field left me by my ancestors for six generations belongs to me, or to a stranger three hundred miles off.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 221</div></div><p>Once lawyers are dispensed with, the way the global economy works is on the chopping block. Again, the critique of capitalism <em>then</em> continues to be very applicable today.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;But, in order to feed the luxury and intemperance of the males, and the vanity of the females, we sent away the greatest part of our necessary things to other countries, whence, in return, we brought the materials of diseases, folly, and vice, to spend among ourselves.  Hence it follows of necessity, that vast numbers of our people are compelled to seek their livelihood by begging, robbing, stealing, cheating, pimping, flattering, suborning, forswearing, forging, gaming, lying, fawning, hectoring, voting, scribbling, star-gazing, poisoning, whoring, canting, libelling, freethinking, and the like occupations:” every one of which terms I was at much pains to make him understand. “That wine was not imported among us from foreign countries to supply the want of water or other drinks, but because it was a sort of liquid which made us merry by putting us out of our senses, diverted all melancholy thoughts, begat wild extravagant imaginations in the brain, raised our hopes and banished our fears, suspended every office of reason for a time, and deprived us of the use of our limbs, till we fell into a profound sleep; although it must be confessed, that we always awaked sick and dispirited; and that the use of this liquor filled us with diseases which made our lives uncomfortable and short.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 223</div></div><p>After lawyers and the economy, Swift ruthlessly attacks the peerage.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;That a weak diseased body, a meagre countenance, and sallow complexion, are the true marks of noble blood; and a healthy robust appearance is so disgraceful in a man of quality, that the world concludes his real father to have been a groom or a coachman.  The imperfections of his mind run parallel with those of his body, being a composition of spleen, dullness, ignorance, caprice, sensuality, and pride. “Without the consent of this illustrious body, no law can be enacted, repealed, or altered: and these nobles have likewise the decision of all our possessions, without appeal.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 227</div></div><p>Methinks Swift really was an equal-rights advocate, as shown in the passage below.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;[…] my master thought it monstrous in us, to give the females a different kind of education from the males, except in some articles of domestic management; whereby, as he truly observed, one half of our natives were good for nothing but bringing children into the world; and to trust the care of our children to such useless animals, he said, was yet a greater instance of brutality.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 240</div></div><p>That&rsquo;s human skin that he&rsquo;s using to cover his canoe. And that tallow is rendered human fat.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;I finished a sort of Indian canoe, but much larger, covering it with the skins of Yahoos, well stitched together with hempen threads of my own making.  My sail was likewise composed of the skins of the same animal; but I made use of the youngest I could get, the older being too tough and thick; and I likewise provided myself with four paddles. &rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 252</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;[…] tried my canoe in a large pond, near my master’s house, and then corrected in it what was amiss; stopping all the chinks with Yahoos’ tallow, till I found it staunch, and able to bear me and my freight; and, when it was as complete as I could possibly make it, I had it drawn on a carriage very gently by Yahoos to the sea-side, under the conduct of the sorrel nag and another servant.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 252</div></div><p>Once Gulliver returns to his family, he still can&rsquo;t integrate into the world of what he now can longer help but think of as Yahoo society.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;As soon as I entered the house, my wife took me in her arms, and kissed me; at which, having not been used to the touch of that odious animal for so many years, I fell into a swoon for almost an hour.  At the time I am writing, it is five years since my last return to England.  During the first year, I could not endure my wife or children in my presence; the very smell of them was intolerable; much less could I suffer them to eat in the same room.  To this hour they dare not presume to touch my bread, or drink out of the same cup, neither was I ever able to let one of them take me by the hand.  The first money I laid out was to buy two young stone-horses, which I keep in a good stable; and next to them, the groom is my greatest favourite, for I feel my spirits revived by the smell he contracts in the stable.  My horses understand me tolerably well; I converse with them at least four hours every day.  They are strangers to bridle or saddle; they live in great amity with me and friendship to each other.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 260</div></div><p>Swift has one arrow left in his quiver and reserves it for how the West runs its empires, in particular the British one. Again, 300 years later and the game plan is unchanged.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;For instance, a crew of pirates are driven by a storm they know not whither; at length a boy discovers land from the topmast; they go on shore to rob and plunder, they see a harmless people, are entertained with kindness; they give the country a new name; they take formal possession of it for their king; they set up a rotten plank, or a stone, for a memorial; they murder two or three dozen of the natives, bring away a couple more, by force, for a sample; return home, and get their pardon.  Here commences a new dominion acquired with a title by divine right.  Ships are sent with the first opportunity; the natives driven out or destroyed; their princes tortured to discover their gold; a free license given to all acts of inhumanity and lust, the earth reeking with the blood of its inhabitants: and this execrable crew of butchers, employed in so pious an expedition, is a modern colony, sent to convert and civilize an idolatrous and barbarous people! But this description, I confess, does by no means affect the British nation, who may be an example to the whole world for their wisdom, care, and justice in planting colonies; their liberal endowments for the advancement of religion and learning; their choice of devout and able pastors to propagate Christianity; their caution in stocking their provinces with people of sober lives and conversations from this the mother kingdom; their strict regard to the distribution of justice, in supplying the civil administration through all their colonies with officers of the greatest abilities, utter strangers to corruption; and, to crown all, by sending the most vigilant and virtuous governors, who have no other views than the happiness of the people over whom they preside, and the honour of the king their master.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 264</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;But as those countries which I have described do not appear to have any desire of being conquered and enslaved, murdered or driven out by colonies, nor abound either in gold, silver, sugar, or tobacco, I did humbly conceive, they were by no means proper objects of our zeal, our valour, or our interest.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 265</div></div>      </div>
      </div>
        <div class="footer">
    <div class="footer-data"><div class="footer-links"><ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/contact.php" title="">Contact</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/support.php" title="">Support</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/privacy.php" title="">Privacy</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/rights.php" title="">Rights</a></li></ul></div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="copyright">Copyright (c) 1999-2026 earthli.com. All Rights Reserved.</div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="versions">Powered by <ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore/app_news.php">earthli News 3.7</a></li><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore" title="">earthli WebCore&trade; 3.7</a></li></ul></div></div>    </div>
      </div>
  </div>  </body>
</html>
]]>
  </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
      <title type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[The Dead Mountaineer's Inn by Arkady & Boris Strugatsky (1970) (read in 2016)]]>
  </title>
    <id>https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3229</id>
    <link href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3229"/>
    <updated>2016-05-05T11:58:58+02:00</updated>
    <author>
        <name type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[Marco von Ballmoos]]>
  </name>
      <uri>https://earthli.com/users/marco</uri>
    </author>
      <summary type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<blockquote class="quote abstract "><div>Disclaimer: these are notes I took while reading this book. They include citations I found interesting or enlightening or particularly well-written. In some cases, I&rsquo;ve pointed out which of these applies to which citation; in others, I have not. Any benefit you gain from reading these notes is... [<a class="complete-text-link" href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3229">More</a>]</div></blockquote>]]>
  </summary>
      <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<html lang="en">
  <head>
    <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/themes/ice.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/fonts/raleway.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/core/medium.css">
  </head>
  <body>
<div class="style-controls">  <div class="page">
    <div class="page-body">
<div class="info-box-top">
<p>
Published by <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_user.php?name=marco" title="Marco von Ballmoos" class="visible">marco</a> on <span class="date-time">5. May 2016 11:58:58 (GMT-5)</span>
</p>
<p>
Updated by <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_user.php?name=marco" title="Marco von Ballmoos" class="visible">marco</a> on <span class="date-time">5. May 2016 11:59:25 (GMT-5)</span>
</p>
</div>
      <div class="text-flow wide">
  <blockquote class="quote abstract "><div>Disclaimer: these are notes I took while reading this book. They include citations I found interesting or enlightening or particularly well-written. In some cases, I&rsquo;ve pointed out which of these applies to which citation; in others, I have not. Any benefit you gain from reading these notes is purely incidental to the purpose they serve of reminding me what I once read. Please see Wikipedia for a summary if I&rsquo;ve failed to provide one sufficient for your purposes. If my notes serve to trigger an interest in this book, then I&rsquo;m happy for you.</div></blockquote><p>This is a whodunnit mystery starring Peter Glebsky as a Russian customs and counterfeit officer on vacation at a remote mountain cabin—somewhere in the Alps—with several other guests. He has traveled there alone and wishes to enjoy two weeks away from work. Classic setup.</p>
<p>The other guests are all odd in their own way: the exceedingly rich Mr. Morse and his ravishing wife, the illusionist Mr. Du Barnstoker and his androgynous and near-constantly be-sunglassed nibling Brun, Mr. Simonet, a world-renowned physicist and accomplished mountain climber, Mr. Hinckus, an odd, little and quiet attorney, as well as Olaf Andvarafors, a giant of a man in both size and personality.</p>
<p>As you can well imagine, bodies start to appear, alcohol is drunk in prodigious quantities, accusations are thrown, people disappear, odd clues are found and Glebsky is drawn ever farther from the peace and relaxation he&rsquo;d sought. The Mafia becomes involved. Some of the guests turn out to be robots.</p>
<p>This is a story of first contact. As with <em>Roadside Picnic</em>, this alien contact does not lead to any satisfying conclusion for anyone. It is depicted as confusing and fruitless as such things usually are (i.e. when two cultures collide, if only briefly). In the light of not being able know for sure anything about anything, Glebsky muses that one unsatisfying &ldquo;truth&rdquo; is as good as any other, so one might as well choose the most satisfying one.</p>
<h2>Citations</h2><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;“Yes,” he said. “I know what you mean: the way a man carries himself is the most important thing, everything else is secondary. No doubt you’re right. Mr. Simone has provided me with an inexhaustible source of reflection on the glaring discrepancy between a man’s behavior when he’s relaxing, and the value for humankind of that same man when he’s at work.” “Huh,” I said. It was worse than the quirt.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 650-654</div></div><p>I was intrigued by the use of this phrase, as I&rsquo;d only known the name from the NHL player.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Miraculously preserved, in spite of everything. It’s a Pavel Bure.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 1153-1154</div></div><p>Here Glebsky muses on what I have found to be a consistent Strugatsky theme: the bliss of ignorance.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;What did I know about this apparatus? Only what Moses had told me. Yes, everything that Moses had said sounded true. <strong>And if it was just a very consistent picture of something whose truth was completely different?</strong> If I had only been unable to find the question that would have shattered this picture’s surface. (Emphasis added.)&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 3350-3352</div></div><p>Gelbsky muses on how we confabulate and teach others around us to do so, as well.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;She says that even if I hadn’t made things so difficult for Moses and the rest of them, it would have still ended in a huge tragedy, because then the gangsters would have arrived at the inn and, most likely, killed all of us who were still there. All that is undoubtedly true. <strong>I myself have taught her to say these things, only by now she has forgotten that, and it seems to her that they are her own ideas.</strong> (Emphasis added.)&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Position 3555-3558</div></div>      </div>
      </div>
        <div class="footer">
    <div class="footer-data"><div class="footer-links"><ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/contact.php" title="">Contact</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/support.php" title="">Support</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/privacy.php" title="">Privacy</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/rights.php" title="">Rights</a></li></ul></div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="copyright">Copyright (c) 1999-2026 earthli.com. All Rights Reserved.</div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="versions">Powered by <ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore/app_news.php">earthli News 3.7</a></li><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore" title="">earthli WebCore&trade; 3.7</a></li></ul></div></div>    </div>
      </div>
  </div>  </body>
</html>
]]>
  </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
      <title type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[Roadside Picnic by Boris & Arkady Strugatsky (1972) (read in 2016)]]>
  </title>
    <id>https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3230</id>
    <link href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3230"/>
    <updated>2016-05-05T11:11:58+02:00</updated>
    <author>
        <name type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[Marco von Ballmoos]]>
  </name>
      <uri>https://earthli.com/users/marco</uri>
    </author>
      <summary type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<blockquote class="quote abstract "><div>Disclaimer: these are notes I took while reading this book. They include citations I found interesting or enlightening or particularly well-written. In some cases, I&rsquo;ve pointed out which of these applies to which citation; in others, I have not. Any benefit you gain from reading these notes is... [<a class="complete-text-link" href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3230">More</a>]</div></blockquote>]]>
  </summary>
      <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<html lang="en">
  <head>
    <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/themes/ice.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/fonts/raleway.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/core/medium.css">
  </head>
  <body>
<div class="style-controls">  <div class="page">
    <div class="page-body">
<div class="info-box-top">
<p>
Published by <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_user.php?name=marco" title="Marco von Ballmoos" class="visible">marco</a> on <span class="date-time">5. May 2016 11:11:58 (GMT-5)</span>
</p>
</div>
      <div class="text-flow wide">
  <blockquote class="quote abstract "><div>Disclaimer: these are notes I took while reading this book. They include citations I found interesting or enlightening or particularly well-written. In some cases, I&rsquo;ve pointed out which of these applies to which citation; in others, I have not. Any benefit you gain from reading these notes is purely incidental to the purpose they serve of reminding me what I once read. Please see Wikipedia for a summary if I&rsquo;ve failed to provide one sufficient for your purposes. If my notes serve to trigger an interest in this book, then I&rsquo;m happy for you.</div></blockquote><p>This is the book on which director Andrei Tarkovsky&rsquo;s <em>Stalker</em> was based. The world of the book has six Zones on it, areas tainted by the touch of alien contact. These areas have artifacts with fantastic properties but unknown use. The use to which humanity can put them may be incidental to their original purpose. For all intents and purposes, humanity has no chance of understanding what happened when the aliens visited—the gulf is far too great. The aliens are much too advanced for humanity to even begin to empathize or understand them.</p>
<p>We follow the story of Red Schuhart, a gifted stalker—someone who enters the Zones to pilfer artifacts—over several years, as he is hired and fired by a research company, as he goes to jail and is released to stalk again, as he tries to provide for his family, as he is trapped for his whole life in the whorl around the Zone in his town. The plot is different than the movie, though Red&rsquo;s final mission into the zone <em>roughly</em> matches up with the movie&rsquo;s plot: in the book, he seeks a wish-granting &ldquo;golden sphere&rdquo; whereas in the movie, it&rsquo;s a room.</p>
<p>I love the Strugatsky brothers&rsquo; style. It&rsquo;s very much cynical, with great characters, very much on a par with 60s and 70s-era science fiction in the the United States. This is a fantastic story and pairs extremely well with the film.</p>
<h2>Citations</h2><p>From the foreword by Ursula K. LeGuin:</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The Strugatsky brothers were not blatant, and never (to my limited knowledge) directly critical of their government’s policies. What they did, which I found most admirable then and still do now, was to write as if they were indifferent to ideology—something many of us writers in the Western democracies had a hard time doing. They wrote as free men write.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 30-32</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;And those toads hate you, they get no pleasure from arresting you, the bastards are scared to death that you might be contagious—they just want to shoot you down . . . And they are holding all the cards: go ahead and prove later that they killed you illegally.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 571-573</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;He was simply waiting for a phone call while his visitor, Dr. Pillman, was lazily reprimanding him. Or imagining that he was reprimanding him. Or trying to convince himself that he was reprimanding him.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 1617-1619</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;I like being praised. Especially by General Lemchen, in spite of himself. It’s funny, I wonder why we like being praised. There’s no money in it. Fame? How famous could we get? He became famous: now he’s known to three. Maybe four, if you count Bayliss. Aren’t humans absurd? I suppose we like praise for its own sake. The way children like ice cream. It’s an inferiority complex, that’s what it is. Praise assuages our insecurities. And ridiculously so. How could I rise in my own opinion?&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 1675-1678</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>“Listen, Valentine,” said Noonan, cutting a piece of meat and dipping it in the sauce. “How do you think it’s all going to end?”</p>
<p>“What are you talking about?”</p>
<p>“The Visit. Zones, stalkers, military-industrial complexes—the whole stinking mess. How could it all end?”</p>
<p>For a long time, Valentine stared at him through his opaque black lenses. Then he lit up a cigarette and said, “For whom? Be more specific.”</p>
<p>“Well, say, for humanity as a whole.”</p>
<p>“That depends on our luck,” said Valentine. “We now know that for humanity as a whole, the Visit has largely passed without a trace. For humanity everything passes without a trace. <strong>Of course, it’s possible that by randomly pulling chestnuts out of this fire, we’ll eventually stumble on something that will make life on Earth completely unbearable.</strong> That would be bad luck. But you have to admit, that’s a danger humanity has always faced.” He waved away the cigarette smoke and smiled wryly. “You see, I’ve long since become unused to discussing humanity as a whole. Humanity as a whole is too stable a system, nothing upsets it.” (Emphasis added.)</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 1959-1969</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>"But I have to warn you, Richard, that your question falls under the umbrella of a pseudoscience called xenology. Xenology is an unnatural mixture of science fiction and formal logic. At its core is a flawed assumption—that an alien race would be psychologically human.”</p>
<p>“Why flawed?” asked Noonan.</p>
<p>“Because biologists have already been burned attempting to apply human psychology to animals. Earth animals, I note.”</p>
<p>“Just a second,” said Noonan. “That’s totally different. We’re talking about the psychology of intelligent beings.”</p>
<p>“True. And that would be just fine, if we knew what intelligence was.”</p>
<p>“And we don’t?” asked Noonan in surprise.</p>
<p>“Believe it or not, we don’t. We usually proceed from a trivial definition: intelligence is the attribute of man that separates his activity from that of the animals. It’s a kind of attempt to distinguish the master from his dog, who seems to understand everything but can’t speak. However, this trivial definition does lead to wittier ones. They are based on depressing observations of the aforementioned human activity. For example: <strong>intelligence is the ability of a living creature to perform pointless or unnatural acts.</strong>” (Emphasis added.)</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 1984-1995</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>"Well, how about the idea that humans, unlike animals, have an overpowering need for knowledge? I’ve read that somewhere.”</p>
<p>“So have I,” said Valentine. “But the issue is that man, at least the average man, can easily overcome this need. In my opinion, the need doesn’t exist at all. There’s a need to understand, but that doesn’t require knowledge. <strong>The God hypothesis, for example, allows you to have an unparalleled understanding of absolutely everything while knowing absolutely nothing</strong> . . . Give a man a highly simplified model of the world and interpret every event on the basis of this simple model. This approach requires no knowledge. A few rote formulas, plus some so-called intuition, some so-called practical acumen, and some so-called common sense.” (Emphasis added.)</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 2002-2008</div></div><p>This next citation is the story behind the theory of the alien visit from which the book takes its title: that the aliens are so far beyond humanity, so ineffable, that, where humanity tries to attribute cosmic significance to the Zones, they are really just the prosaic effluvia of a unremarkable event in the lives of the aliens that left them.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Imagine: a forest, a country road, a meadow. A car pulls off the road into the meadow and unloads young men, bottles, picnic baskets, girls, transistor radios, cameras . . . A fire is lit, tents are pitched, music is played. And in the morning they leave. The animals, birds, and insects that were watching the whole night in horror crawl out of their shelters. And what do they see? An oil spill, a gasoline puddle, old spark plugs and oil filters strewn about . . . Scattered rags, burntout bulbs, someone has dropped a monkey wrench. The wheels have tracked mud from some godforsaken swamp . . . and, of course, there are the remains of the campfire, apple cores, candy wrappers, tins, bottles, someone’s handkerchief, someone’s penknife, old ragged newspapers, coins, wilted flowers from another meadow . . .”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 2018-2024</div></div><p>There are other theories, more generous to mankind, but not likely to be more true.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>"So-called serious xenologists try to justify interpretations that are much more respectable and flattering to human vanity. For example, that the Visit hasn’t happened yet, that the real Visit is yet to come. Some higher intelligence came to Earth and left us containers with samples of their material culture. They expect us to study these samples and make a technological leap, enabling us to send back a signal indicating we’re truly ready for contact. How’s that?”</p>
<p>“That’s much better,” said Noonan. “I see that even among the scientists there are decent men.”</p>
<p>“Or here’s another one. The Visit did take place, but it is by no means over. We’re actually in contact as we speak, we just don’t know it. The aliens are holed up in the Zones and are carefully studying us, simultaneously preparing us for the ‘time of cruel miracles.’”</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 2037-2044</div></div><p>Valentine continues to describe what the Zones might mean, what it means for a civilization to be so much more advanced than ours.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;A lab monkey presses a red button and gets a banana, presses a white button and gets an orange, but has no idea how to obtain bananas or oranges without buttons. Nor does it understand the relationship between buttons and oranges and bananas. Take, say, the spacells. We’ve learned to apply them. We’ve even discovered conditions under which they multiply by division. But we have yet to create a single spacell, have no idea how they work, and, as far as I can tell, won’t figure it out anytime soon.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 2084-2088</div></div><p>But humanity, even in its benighted blindness, can try to make something out of this contact. Perhaps humanity won&rsquo;t grasp even a tiny percentage of the glory, the science, the knowledge immanent to the devices in the Zones, but that tiny percentage may still offer insight, they may show the way to a path where we might, at some point in the far future, be able to learn how to glean more from the Zones.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;“In short, the objects in this group are currently completely useless for human purposes, yet from a purely scientific point of view they have fundamental significance. <strong>These are miraculously received answers to questions we don’t yet know how to pose.</strong> The aforementioned Sir Isaac mightn’t have made sense of the microwave emitter, but he would have at any rate realized that such a thing was possible, and that would have had a very strong effect on his scientific worldview. I won’t get into details, but the existence of such objects as the magnetic traps, the K-twenty-three, and the white ring instantly disproved a number of recently thriving theories and gave rise to some entirely new ideas. (Emphasis added.)&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 2108-2112</div></div><p>The more you know, the greater the burden of knowing what you don&rsquo;t know. Long story short: ignorance is bliss. It always has been and always will be.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Scared, the eggheads. And maybe that’s how it should be. They should be even more scared than the rest of us ordinary folks put together. <strong>Because we merely don’t understand a thing, but they at least understand how much they don’t understand.</strong> They gaze into this bottomless pit and know that they will inevitably have to climb down—their hearts are racing, but they’ll have to do it—except they don’t know how or what awaits them at the bottom or, most important, whether they’ll be able to get back out. Meanwhile, we sinners look the other way, so to speak . . . Listen, maybe that’s how it should be? Let things take their course, and we’ll muddle through somehow. He was right about that: mankind’s most impressive achievement is that it has survived and intends to continue doing so. Still, I hope you go to hell, he told the aliens. You couldn’t have had your picnic somewhere else. On the moon, say. Or on Mars. You are just callous assholes like the rest of them, even if you have learned to curl up space. Had to have a picnic here, you see. A picnic. (Emphasis added.)&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 2187-2195</div></div><p>An insight into the pro-growth world, suffered in the Soviet Union as it was in the rest of the West.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Sometimes I ask myself, Why the hell are we always in such a whirl? For the money? But why in the world do we need money, if all we ever do is keep working?&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 2238-2239</div></div><p>And then there were just some very <em>weird</em> things that happened in the cities in and around the Zones: Schuhart&rsquo;s daughter was born, covered in hair. She is called Monkey. Her grandfather had died, but the Zone brought him back as a shuffling zombie. Sometimes the strangeness of it gets to be too much, even for hard-bitten and cynical residents like Noonan and Red. The emphasized section is a prescient and succinct description of how we continue to deal with far-removed tragedy to this day.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;[…] the Monkey silently appeared by the table next to the old man and stood there for a while, putting her furry little paws on the table. Suddenly, in a completely childlike manner, she leaned against the corpse and put her head on his shoulder. And Noonan, continuing to chatter, looked at these two monstrous offspring of the Zone and thought, My Lord, what else do we need? What else has to be done to us, so it finally gets through? Is this really not enough? He knew that it wasn’t enough. He knew that billions and billions didn’t know a thing and didn’t want to know and, <strong>even if they did find out, would act horrified for ten minutes and immediately forget all about it.</strong> I’ll get wasted, he thought savagely. Screw Burbridge, screw Lemchen . . . Screw this star-crossed family. I’m getting wasted. (Emphasis added.)&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 2366-2372</div></div><p>This next section contains another cry out against the rat race, coming from the Soviet Union rather than the rest of the West. The Strugatsky&rsquo;s evince—seemingly without trying—a commonality among people trapped in a larger web, common to humanity in the 20th century, independent of proclaimed political ethos, capitalism or communism.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Some strange and very new sensation was slowly filling him. He realized that this sensation wasn’t actually new, that it had long been hiding somewhere inside him, but he only now became aware of it, and everything fell into place. And an idea, which had previously seemed like nonsense, like the insane ravings of a senile old man, turned out to be his sole hope and his sole meaning of life. It was only now that he’d understood—the one thing that he still had left, the one thing that had kept him afloat in recent months, was the hope for a miracle. He, the idiot, the dummy, had been spurning this hope, trampling on it, mocking it, drinking it away—because that’s what he was used to and because his whole life, ever since his childhood, he had never relied on anyone but himself. <strong>And ever since his childhood, this self-reliance had always been measured by the amount of money he managed to wrench, wrestle, and wring out of the surrounding indifferent chaos. That’s how it had always been, and that’s how it would have continued, if he hadn’t found himself in a hole from which no amount of money could rescue him, in which self-reliance was utterly pointless.</strong> And now this hope—no longer the hope but the certainty of a miracle—was filling him to the brim, and he was already amazed that he’d managed to live in such a bleak, cheerless gloom. (Emphasis added.)&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 2486-2495</div></div><p>There are several passages where a few words suffice to bring a scene to life—it&rsquo;s easy to understand why Tarkovsky thought this book was such a good fit for his film-craft.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The floor of the valley was covered in a puke-green liquid, glistening greasily in the sun. A light steam was wafting off its surface, becoming thicker between the hills, and they already couldn’t see a thing thirty feet in front of them. And it reeked. God only knew what was rotting in that medley, but to Redrick it seemed that a hundred thousand smashed rotten eggs, poured over a hundred thousand spoiled fish heads and dead cats, couldn’t have reeked the way it reeked here.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 2693-2696</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;With that he abruptly went quiet, as if a huge hand had forcefully shoved a gag into his mouth. And Redrick saw the transparent emptiness lurking in the shadow of the excavator bucket grab him, jerk him up into the air, and slowly, with an effort, twist him, the way a housewife wrings out the laundry. Redrick had the time to notice one of the dusty shoes fly off a twitching foot and soar high above the quarry.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 2862-2864</div></div><p>This next section is from the afterword by the author, in which he very eloquently discusses how ephemeral are the windmills against which we tilt. When you&rsquo;re down in the trenches, in the day-to-day, everything seems so <em>important</em>. Temporal distance has a way of fading out the unimportant and bringing other things into sharp focus. Hopefully the right things, the things that were such an intrinsic part of your day-to-day that perhaps you didn&rsquo;t even think to tilt against them at the time, distracted as you were by minutiae, but which you now realize would have been the proper targets of your ire and energy.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;I was looking forward to using this afterword to tell the story of publishing the Picnic: naming once-hated names; jeering to my heart’s content at the cowards, idiots, informers, and scoundrels; astounding the reader with the absurdity, idiocy, and meanness of the world we’re all from; being ironic and instructive, deliberately objective and ruthless, benevolent and caustic all at once. </p>
<p>&ldquo;And now I’m sitting here, looking at these folders, and realizing that I’m hopelessly late and that no one needs me—not my irony, not my generosity, and not my burnt[-]out hatred. They have ceased to exist, those once-powerful organizations with almost unlimited right to allow and to hinder; they have ceased to exist and are forgotten to such an extent that it would be tedious and dull to explain to the present-day reader who is who, why it didn’t make sense to complain to the Department of Culture of the CC, why the only thing to do was to complain to the Department of Print and Propaganda, and who were Albert Andreevich Beliaev, Pyotr Nilovich Demichev, and Mikhail Vasilyevich Zimyanin—and these were the tigers and elephants of the Soviet ideological fauna, rulers of destinies, deciders of fates! Who remembers them today, and who cares about those of them who are still among the living? So then why bother with the small fry—the shrill crowd of petty bureaucrats of ideology, the countless ideological demons, who caused untold and immeasurable harm and whose vileness and meanness require (as they liked to write in the nineteenth century) a mightier, sharper, and more experienced pen than my own? I don’t even want to mention them here—let them be swallowed up by the past, like evil spirits, and disappear . . .&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 2988-3000</div></div>      </div>
      </div>
        <div class="footer">
    <div class="footer-data"><div class="footer-links"><ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/contact.php" title="">Contact</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/support.php" title="">Support</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/privacy.php" title="">Privacy</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/rights.php" title="">Rights</a></li></ul></div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="copyright">Copyright (c) 1999-2026 earthli.com. All Rights Reserved.</div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="versions">Powered by <ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore/app_news.php">earthli News 3.7</a></li><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore" title="">earthli WebCore&trade; 3.7</a></li></ul></div></div>    </div>
      </div>
  </div>  </body>
</html>
]]>
  </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
      <title type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[Factotum by Charles Bukowski (1975) (read in 2015)]]>
  </title>
    <id>https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3157</id>
    <link href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3157"/>
    <updated>2016-04-27T22:55:13+02:00</updated>
    <author>
        <name type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[Marco von Ballmoos]]>
  </name>
      <uri>https://earthli.com/users/marco</uri>
    </author>
      <summary type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<blockquote class="quote abstract "><div>Disclaimer: these are notes I took while reading this book. They include citations I found interesting or enlightening or particularly well-written. In some cases, I&rsquo;ve pointed out which of these applies to which citation; in others, I have not. Any benefit you gain from reading these notes is... [<a class="complete-text-link" href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3157">More</a>]</div></blockquote>]]>
  </summary>
      <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<html lang="en">
  <head>
    <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/themes/ice.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/fonts/raleway.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/core/medium.css">
  </head>
  <body>
<div class="style-controls">  <div class="page">
    <div class="page-body">
<div class="info-box-top">
<p>
Published by <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_user.php?name=marco" title="Marco von Ballmoos" class="visible">marco</a> on <span class="date-time">27. Apr 2016 22:55:13 (GMT-5)</span>
</p>
</div>
      <div class="text-flow wide">
  <blockquote class="quote abstract "><div>Disclaimer: these are notes I took while reading this book. They include citations I found interesting or enlightening or particularly well-written. In some cases, I&rsquo;ve pointed out which of these applies to which citation; in others, I have not. Any benefit you gain from reading these notes is purely incidental to the purpose they serve of reminding me what I once read. Please see Wikipedia for a summary if I&rsquo;ve failed to provide one sufficient for your purposes. If my notes serve to trigger an interest in this book, then I&rsquo;m happy for you.</div></blockquote><p>Henry Chinaski is a variously employed, alcoholic drifter living in America in the 1940s. He&rsquo;s been rejected from the draft, so he&rsquo;s left in a country that doesn&rsquo;t really want him for anything else, that was already suspicious of people who didn&rsquo;t yearn for the two-kids/white-picket-fence/steady-job dream. He&rsquo;s willing to work, but doesn&rsquo;t like to do the same thing for long, doesn&rsquo;t like authority, and likes to booze and whore and write. He continues to try to publish, but is continually rejected by the only publishing house he considers worthy. He gets involved with Laura and Jan at different times, who have varyingly detrimental effects on his life.</p>
<h2>Citations</h2><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The problem, as it was in those days during the war, was overtime. Those in control always preferred to overwork a few men continually, instead of hiring more people so everyone might work less. You gave the boss eight hours, and he always asked for more. He never sent you home after six hours, for example. You might have time to think.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 57</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The myth of the starving artist was a hoax. Once you realized that everything was a hoax you got wise and began to bleed and burn your fellow man. I’d build an empire upon the broken bodies and lives of helpless men, women, and children—&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 63</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;It was true that I didn’t have much ambition, but there ought to be a place for people without ambition, I mean a better place than the one usually reserved. How in the hell could a man enjoy being awakened at 6:30 a.m. by an alarm clock, leap out of bed, dress, force-feed, shit, piss, brush teeth and hair, and fight traffic to get to a place where essentially you made lots of money for somebody else and were asked to be grateful for the opportunity to do so?&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 127</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;I always started a job with the feeling that I’d soon quit or be fired, and this gave me a relaxed manner that was mistaken for intelligence or some secret power.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 130</div></div>      </div>
      </div>
        <div class="footer">
    <div class="footer-data"><div class="footer-links"><ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/contact.php" title="">Contact</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/support.php" title="">Support</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/privacy.php" title="">Privacy</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/rights.php" title="">Rights</a></li></ul></div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="copyright">Copyright (c) 1999-2026 earthli.com. All Rights Reserved.</div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="versions">Powered by <ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore/app_news.php">earthli News 3.7</a></li><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore" title="">earthli WebCore&trade; 3.7</a></li></ul></div></div>    </div>
      </div>
  </div>  </body>
</html>
]]>
  </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
      <title type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[Lucky Jim by Kingsley Amis (read in 2015)]]>
  </title>
    <id>https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3141</id>
    <link href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3141"/>
    <updated>2016-04-27T07:36:42+02:00</updated>
    <author>
        <name type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[Marco von Ballmoos]]>
  </name>
      <uri>https://earthli.com/users/marco</uri>
    </author>
      <summary type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<blockquote class="quote abstract "><div>Disclaimer: these are notes I took while reading this book. They include citations I found interesting or enlightening or particularly well-written. In some cases, I&rsquo;ve pointed out which of these applies to which citation; in others, I have not. Any benefit you gain from reading these notes is... [<a class="complete-text-link" href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3141">More</a>]</div></blockquote>]]>
  </summary>
      <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<html lang="en">
  <head>
    <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/themes/ice.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/fonts/raleway.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/core/medium.css">
  </head>
  <body>
<div class="style-controls">  <div class="page">
    <div class="page-body">
<div class="info-box-top">
<p>
Published by <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_user.php?name=marco" title="Marco von Ballmoos" class="visible">marco</a> on <span class="date-time">27. Apr 2016 07:36:42 (GMT-5)</span>
</p>
<p>
Updated by <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_user.php?name=marco" title="Marco von Ballmoos" class="visible">marco</a> on <span class="date-time">28. Apr 2016 07:18:50 (GMT-5)</span>
</p>
</div>
      <div class="text-flow wide">
  <blockquote class="quote abstract "><div>Disclaimer: these are notes I took while reading this book. They include citations I found interesting or enlightening or particularly well-written. In some cases, I&rsquo;ve pointed out which of these applies to which citation; in others, I have not. Any benefit you gain from reading these notes is purely incidental to the purpose they serve of reminding me what I once read. Please see Wikipedia for a summary if I&rsquo;ve failed to provide one sufficient for your purposes. If my notes serve to trigger an interest in this book, then I&rsquo;m happy for you.</div></blockquote><p>This book combines the stultifying mundanity of day-to-day drudgery of <em>Confederacy of Dunces</em> with the whining tone of Holden Caulfield from the <em>Catcher in the Rye</em>. The prose is a bit stiff for my tastes and Amis seems, to me, a bit overrated.</p>
<p>The middle bits, which involve Dixon&rsquo;s quasi-dalliance with Christine, are more evocative. The book has that feeling of lifting slowly but seemingly inexorably from a quagmire of boredom, stretching, stretching, with what one feels might perhaps be interpreted as acceleration, a feeling that one would soon snap free of gummy strands that yet cling and tie one to the tedium. But alas this feeling is fleeting—as you knew in your heart of cynical hearts that it probably would be—as the gummy strands win more battles and eventually the war and you sink back into that tepid morass with nary a change for all that you saw when you briefly, if not soared, perhaps one could describe it generously as … flew.</p>
<p>It&rsquo;s as if Dixon is trapped in the miasma of Welch, as a prehistoric fly when first it steps in amber and the honeyed fluid hasn&rsquo;t quite seeped into every last receptor of its compound eye. This book documents the struggles of that fly. In fairness, the fly in this case doesn&rsquo;t struggle so much as complain that the vitrification process isn&rsquo;t going quickly enough and that the other flies should just go about their business and stop bothering it.</p>
<p>The style and subject matter is, at times, quite strongly reminiscent of <em>The Idiot</em> or <em>The Brothers Karamazov</em>, but perhaps that is only because those books also dealt with idiotic families in quasi-boring situations that never come to any strong conclusions. The ending is a bit of a surprise, tying things up in a far neater bow than I&rsquo;d have expected. Was this done because the author wanted his hero to semi-triumph? Or was it an ironic stab at books with happy endings? Is it a happy ending to see Dixon stumble further along the road to success? Was he the hero? Or was he just relatively less-insufferable, rising above the others by dint of their utter awfulness rather than any positive qualities of his own? All in all, it was an interesting read, but as for it being the finest comic novel of the 20th century: no. Not even among British authors. Just, no.</p>
<h2>Citations</h2><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Until then he must try to make Welch like him, and one way of doing that was, he supposed, to be present and conscious while Welch talked about concerts. But did Welch notice who else was there while he talked, and if he noticed did he remember, and if he remembered would it affect such thoughts as he had already?&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 2</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>'What&rsquo;s this, Alrfred?&rsquo; Dixon asked. &lsquo;A bender?&rsquo;</p>
<p>Beesley nodded without stopping drinking; then, lowering his glass at last, wiping his mouth on his sleeve, making a face, and referring to the quality of the beer by a monosyllable not in decent use, he said: &lsquo;I wasn&rsquo;t getting anywhere in there, so I came in here and came over here.&lsquo;</p>
<p>&lsquo;And you&rsquo;re getting somewhere over here, are you, Alfred?&rsquo; Carol asked.</p>
<p>&lsquo;On the tenth half, just about,&rsquo; Beesley said.</p>
<p>&lsquo;Bloody but unbowed, eh? That&rsquo;s the spirit. […]&rsquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 128</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;This time he experienced nothing worse than a small rage at the thought of a little louse like that having a flat in London. Why hadn&rsquo;t he himself had parents whose money so far exceeded their sense as to install their son in London? The very thought it was a torment. If he&rsquo;d had that chance, things would be very different for him now. For a moment, he thought he couldn&rsquo;t think what things; then he found he could conceive the things exactly, and exactly how they&rsquo;d differ from the things he&rsquo;d got, too.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 186</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;A youthful waiter had approached, his footfalls silenced by the carpet, and was now shifting from one foot to the other close by, breathing through his mouth. Dixon thought he&rsquo;d never seen a human frame radiating so much insolence without resource to speech, gesture, or any contortion of the features. This figure swung a silver tray in an attempt at careless grace, and was looking past Dixon at Christine. When Dixon said, &lsquo;Tea for two, please&rsquo; the waiter smiled faintly at her, as if in lofty but sincere commiseration, then swung aside, allowing the tray to rebound from his kneecap as he walked off.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 206</div></div>      </div>
      </div>
        <div class="footer">
    <div class="footer-data"><div class="footer-links"><ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/contact.php" title="">Contact</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/support.php" title="">Support</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/privacy.php" title="">Privacy</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/rights.php" title="">Rights</a></li></ul></div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="copyright">Copyright (c) 1999-2026 earthli.com. All Rights Reserved.</div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="versions">Powered by <ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore/app_news.php">earthli News 3.7</a></li><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore" title="">earthli WebCore&trade; 3.7</a></li></ul></div></div>    </div>
      </div>
  </div>  </body>
</html>
]]>
  </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
      <title type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[Books read in 2015]]>
  </title>
    <id>https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3127</id>
    <link href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3127"/>
    <updated>2016-04-20T08:28:56+02:00</updated>
    <author>
        <name type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[Marco von Ballmoos]]>
  </name>
      <uri>https://earthli.com/users/marco</uri>
    </author>
      <summary type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<dl><dt class="field">Don Quixote (1605)</dt>
<dd><div class=" "><p>by <em>Miguel de Cervantes</em></p>
<p>I liked part two even better than part one. Part II of the book starts with a discussion of the first part of the book, which in this second part has appeared as a publication already famous throughout Spain. Don Quixote and Sancho Panza discuss this book... [<a class="complete-text-link" href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3127">More</a>]</p>
</div></dd>
</dl>]]>
  </summary>
      <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<html lang="en">
  <head>
    <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/themes/ice.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/fonts/raleway.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/core/medium.css">
  </head>
  <body>
<div class="style-controls">  <div class="page">
    <div class="page-body">
<div class="info-box-top">
<p>
Published by <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_user.php?name=marco" title="Marco von Ballmoos" class="visible">marco</a> on <span class="date-time">20. Apr 2016 08:28:56 (GMT-5)</span>
</p>
<p>
Updated by <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_user.php?name=marco" title="Marco von Ballmoos" class="visible">marco</a> on <span class="date-time">27. Apr 2016 22:54:57 (GMT-5)</span>
</p>
</div>
      <div class="text-flow wide">
  <dl><dt class="field">Don Quixote (1605)</dt>
<dd><div class=" "><p>by <em>Miguel de Cervantes</em></p>
<p>I liked part two even better than part one. Part II of the book starts with a discussion of the first part of the book, which in this second part has appeared as a publication already famous throughout Spain. Don Quixote and Sancho Panza discuss this book with a bachelor who is very familiar with it, questioning and probing to determine that it reflects the truth…but not too much of the truth. This part is really very nicely written and the self-referential part as well as the oblique chastisement of Cervantes’s own detractors and critics is quite a master stroke.</p>
<p>Cervantes packs this long book full of wonderful prose, never missing an opportunity for a small joke or pithy phrase (much as Sancho never misses an opportunity to utter a proverb). So many paragraphs are like exquisite sculptures, standing nearly on their own, and the careful reader is constantly rewarded.</p>
<p>I&rsquo;ve included <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3035">notes, citations and errata</a> in a separate post.</p>
</div></dd>
<dt class="field">A Feast for Crows (2005)</dt>
<dd><div class=" "><p>by <em>George R.R. Martin</em></p>
<p>This is book four of the <em>Song of Ice and Fire</em>. Cersei descends into paranoid madness, reinstating a religious army, an act she would come to rue as it backfires spectacularly. Jaime and Brienne meet up again in the Riverlands, after Jaime had solved a few issues there. The Iron Islands feature much more prominently, with all of the Greyjoys—Euron, Victarion, Aeron and Asha—getting in on the action. In Dorne, intrigue abounds, with plot built on plot and the Red Viper&rsquo;s brother machinating to maintain the power balance with King&rsquo;s Landing and the upper South. Quentyn Martell has traveled East with his friends to try to join Dorne to the Targaryens through Daenerys. Arya arrives in Braavos and apprentices at the House of Black and White. Jon maintains a balance between Stannis&rsquo;s demands—and those of Melisandre—as well as arming to fight the Others from the North. Samwell travels with Gilly and Aemon around the periphery of the Seven Kingdoms by boat, to get to Old Town and train at the Citadel.</p>
<p>I&rsquo;ve included <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3116">notes, citations and errata</a> in a separate post.</p>
</div></dd>
<dt class="field">A Dance with Dragons (2011)</dt>
<dd><div class=" "><p>by <em>George R.R. Martin</em></p>
<p>This is book five of the <em>Song of Ice and Fire</em>. Bran ends up in the lair of the Children of the Forest, far North of the Wall, with the three-eyed raven. Jon&rsquo;s fate is unknown, but things don&rsquo;t look too good. Arya&rsquo;s training continues. Tyrion is captured by Mormont and both of them near Meerreen. Quentyn&rsquo;s mission fails horribly, Victarion approaches Meereen, possessed of powers. Daenerys accepts her destiny and mounts Drogon. Stannis marches on the marshes first, rousts the Ironborn, captures Asha and then sinks into the snows before he can arrive at Winterfell, where he wants to roust the Boltons. Young Aegon Targaryen and John Connington land in Dorne and make their way north to attempt recapture of the Iron Throne. Cersei takes the walk of shame.</p>
<p>I&rsquo;ve included <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3115">notes, citations and errata</a> in a separate post.</p>
</div></dd>
<dt class="field">One Flew over the Cuckoo&rsquo;s Nest (1962)</dt>
<dd><div class=" "><p>by <em>Ken Kesey</em></p>
<p>This is the story of a the Big Chief and McMurphy and Nurse Ratched. The Big Chief is a long-time resident of the mental institution run by Head Nurse Ratched; McMurphy arrives as a transferee from a work camp who thinks he&rsquo;s going to have an easier ride in the home. This is true, at least at first. He is a breath of fresh air for the other inmates there, a force of nature, as it were. he chafes and takes liberties and cracks wise and runs card games and generally doesn&rsquo;t follow the rules. He tries to help free the others from their artificial, psychological fetters. He takes them on a fishing trip. He sneaks ladies and booze into the building late at night. He tries to help poor Billy. Ratched thwarts him every step of the way. The Big Chief narrates, grows and learns. McMurphy sacrifices the last of what he has in a futile act of revenge, though he is aware of what is happening. The Big Chief makes an actual escape. Really surprisingly well-written and deep. Recommended.</p>
<p>I&rsquo;ve included <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3135">notes, citations and errata</a> in a separate post.</p>
</div></dd>
<dt class="field">Austerity: The History of a Dangerous Idea (2013)</dt>
<dd><div class=" "><p>by <em>Mark Blyth</em></p>
<p>This excellent book provides an approachable analysis of the recent history of the financial crisis that started in 2006, exploded in 2008 and is still being sorely felt by many in 2015. Blyth skewers the main idea for solving the crisis: austerity for the majority of the public. Why is austerity not the solution? He lists many reasons, but the main one is that it doesn&rsquo;t work. It has never worked. Accurate histories show that it doesn&rsquo;t work. Inaccurate studies claim that it might work.</p>
<p>Worse, the crisis was caused by private machinations and profit-taking and the price is paid by the public—who&rsquo;ve already paid the price in the form of a severely impacted economy. The public pays twice for the <del>mistakes</del>crimes of the few, while the few take their profit, take no punishment and line themselves up for the next reaping.</p>
<p>How do they get away with it? By selling the idea of austerity of all: if <em>our</em> economy tanked, then it must be our <em>collective</em> fault and we must <em>all</em> shoulder the blame and <em>tighten our belts</em>. The private losses are bailed out by the state and instantly transformed into a story of state profligacy. It&rsquo;s like a child who crashes his car, gets his father to buy him a new one, then mocks said father for not being able to pay the rent.</p>
<p>Never mind that it is exactly these <em>jackasses</em> who aren&rsquo;t tightening their belts—we can&rsquo;t police everyone, can we? Never mind that exactly those who aren&rsquo;t tightening their belts are actually the ones who caused the problems in the first place. With their <em>crimes</em>. Some will argue that what happened was perfectly legal—but that is only because those who commit crimes at high levels are careful to ensure that the crimes they wish to commit are first made legal.</p>
<p>This is an important book. Blyth cover the minutiae of recent history, covers the history of austerity over the last century, examines the writings and recommendations of oft-cited and great economists of the past—Locke, Hume, Smith, Keynes, among others—and looks at recent academic studies that are clearly if not deliberately fraudulent. He is a bit cagey about coming right out and accusing world leaders of collusion and corruption to serve their rich buddies and financial partners, but we can excuse an academic a bit of hedging. See below for my <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3136#less-generous-analysis">less-generous analysis</a> and <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3136#idea-for-solution">Blyth&rsquo;s possible solutions</a>.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;When world leaders keen to legitimize the damage that they have already done to the lives of millions of their fellow citizens reach for examples such as these to vindicate their actions, applauding these countries for creating misery, it shows us one this above all. Austerity remains an ideology immune to facts and basic empirical refutation.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 226</div></div><p>I&rsquo;ve included <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3136">notes, citations and errata</a> in a separate post.</p>
</div></dd>
<dt class="field">The Handmaid&rsquo;s Tale (1985)</dt>
<dd><div class=" "><p>by <em>Margaret Atwood</em></p>
<p>The <em>Handmaid&rsquo;s Tale</em> is the story of a possible future America in which society has taken a rather hard, right turn into a dystopian, quasi-religious patriarchy—more even that what exists today. In this world, women have no rights whatsoever. Some are used as drudges—Marthas—while others—Aunts—inculcate the new regime to the breeders—Handmaids—and, finally, there are the Wives. Among the men, the Commanders are at the top of the food chain—they are married to Wives—but also have a series of Handmaids. There are other men, high-ranking soldiers—Angels—as well as spies—Eyes.</p>
<p>The prose is poetic, evocative, metaphorical, at-times almost hallucinatory—as if the mists of recollection have twisted certain parts of the remembered past. The ideas and chilling visions are just as likely to happen as they were in the 80s, when the book was written. There are good portions of the American population who would happily view the book as a guide to revolution, to creating a better version of America. At times reminiscent of <em>Orwell&rsquo;s</em> <em>1984</em>. Highly recommended.</p>
<p>I&rsquo;ve included <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3134">notes, citations and errata</a> in a separate post.</p>
</div></dd>
<dt class="field">Lucky Jim (1953)</dt>
<dd><div class=" "><p>by <em>Kingsley Amis</em></p>
<p>So far, it combines the stultifying mundanity of day-to-day drudgery of <em>Confederacy of Dunces</em> with the whining tone of Holden Caulfield from the <em>Catcher in the Rye</em>. The prose is a bit stiff for my tastes and Amis seems, to me, a bit overrated.</p>
<p>The middle bits, which involve Dixon&rsquo;s quasi-dalliance with Christine, are more evocative. The book has that feeling of lifting slowly but seemingly inexorably from a quagmire of boredom, stretching, stretching, with what one feels might perhaps be interpreted as acceleration, a feeling that one would soon snap free of gummy strands that yet cling and tie one to the tedium. But alas this feeling is fleeting, as you knew in your heart of cynical hearts that it probably would be, as the gummy strands win more battles and eventually the war and you sink back into that tepid morass with nary a change for all that you saw when you briefly, if not soared, perhaps one could describe it generously as … flew.</p>
<p>It&rsquo;s as if Dixon is trapped in the miasma of Welch, as a prehistoric fly when first it steps in amber and the honeyed fluid hasn&rsquo;t quite seeped into every last receptor of its compound eye. This book documents the struggles of that fly. In fairness, the fly in this case doesn&rsquo;t struggle so much as complain that the vitrification process isn&rsquo;t going quickly enough and that the other flies should just go about their business and stop bothering it.</p>
<p>The style and subject matter is, at times, quite strongly reminiscent of <em>The Idiot</em> or <em>The Brothers Karamazov</em>, but perhaps that is only because those books also dealt with idiotic families in quasi-boring situations that never come to any strong conclusions. The ending is a bit of a surprise, tying things up in a far neater bow than I&rsquo;d have expected. Was this done to because the author wanted his hero to semi-triumph? Or was it an ironic stab at books with happy endings? Is it a happy ending to see Dixon stumble further along the road to success? Was he the hero? Or was he just relatively less-insufferable, rising above the others by dint of their utter awfulness rather than an positive qualities of his own? All in all, it was an interesting read, but as for it being the finest comic novel of the 20th century: no. Not even among British authors. Just, no.</p>
<p>I&rsquo;ve included <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3141">notes, citations and errata</a> in a separate post.</p>
</div></dd>
<dt class="field">Joyland (2013)</dt>
<dd><div class=" "><p>by <em>Stephen King</em></p>
<p>You can tell this is a Stephen King book from a mile away. It&rsquo;s about a young man—Devin, a writer—who&rsquo;s been jilted by the love of his life. She&rsquo;s decided that it&rsquo;s time to see other people and he&rsquo;s not quite on board with that yet. So he takes a job several states away and spends a good deal of time mooning around over her. He makes a couple of good friends at this odd little amusement park called Joyland. They have a dog mascot that he&rsquo;s especially good at playing. After learning of a ghost in the haunted-house ride, Devin becomes nearly obsessed with the case and is convinced that he can release the ghost if he just finds the real killer. Along the way, he befriends a standoffish woman, Annie, through her son Mike, who&rsquo;s physically disabled but gifted in other ways. He is crucial to releasing the ghost because of his psychic powers. They finally discover the real killer hiding right under their noses. They all learn a lot about life, go their separate ways and nobody really lives happily ever after, but that&rsquo;s OK too.</p>
<p>I&rsquo;ve included <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3149">notes, citations and errata</a> in a separate post.</p>
</div></dd>
<dt class="field">And Another Thing… (2013)</dt>
<dd><div class=" "><p>by <em>Eoin Colfer</em></p>
<p>This is the sixth in the increasingly inaccurately named trilogy, the <em>Hitchhiker&rsquo;s Guide to the Galaxy</em>. This installment picks up where Adams left off in <em>Mostly Harmless</em> and reads a bit like Pratchett&rsquo;s <em>Raising Steam</em> in that absolutely everyone from the respective pantheon appears. The good news is that it&rsquo;s a pretty good story and the characters are handled well and feel natural. The dialogue is clever and the writing is funny. Good old Wowbagger the Infinitely Prolonged features prominently as well as the always interesting Trillian and Tricia McMillan. A planet built by the Magrathean Slartibartfast has been populated by people far too rich for their own good and they&rsquo;re petitioning for a God to rule their planet for them. Wowbagger and Thor both show up and lock horns. Even the Vogons, led by the implacable Prostetnic Jeltz and his son, who&rsquo;s not as enthusiastic as his father about eliminating humanity forever (finally closing the chapter on every possible extrusion in every possible multiverse). A fun romp and an installment that can stand proudly next to the others.</p>
<p>I&rsquo;ve included <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3151">notes, citations and errata</a> in a separate post.</p>
</div></dd>
<dt class="field">The Futurological Congress: From the Memoirs of Ijon Tichy (1971)</dt>
<dd><div class=" "><p>by <em>Stanislaw Lem</em></p>
<p>This is a surrealist romp by the master of speculative non-hard science fiction, Stanislaw Lem. In this one, we meet the narrator Ijon Tichy, who is so wonderfully written and who is so convincing, that one quickly wonders whether the eponymous congress actually exists. It doesn&rsquo;t. The Congress takes place in Costa Rica, a convocation of the best and brightest minds that looks to tackle the problem of the future for the whole of planet Earth. In particular, they are to tackle the problem of population. Everything that follows may or may not have taken place, because of the copious amounts of mind-altering substances ingested both deliberately and accidentally by the author.</p>
<p>I&rsquo;ve included <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3152">notes, citations and errata</a> in a separate post.</p>
</div></dd>
<dt class="field">23 Things They Don&rsquo;t Tell You about Capitalism (2012)</dt>
<dd><div class=" "><p>by <em>Ha-Joon Chang</em></p>
<p>This is the second book I&rsquo;ve read by Chang. The first was <em>Kicking Away the Ladder</em>, which discussed how the much-ballyhooed free-market practices forced on developing countries were not used by the first-world countries when they themselves were developing. This book kind of picks up where the other left off. Instead of viewing the obvious disparity between what the developed world says and what it does in a clinical manner, Chang uses a more class-based lens to examine how the rich manipulate the story to benefit themselves. A primary part of that story is the myth of capital-C Capitalism.</p>
<p>I&rsquo;ve included <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3153">notes, citations and errata</a> in a separate post.</p>
</div></dd>
<dt class="field">Factotum (1975)</dt>
<dd><div class=" "><p>by <em>Charles Bukowski</em></p>
<p>Henry Chinaski is a variously employed, alcoholic drifter living in America in the 1940s. He&rsquo;s been rejected from the draft, so he&rsquo;s left in a country that doesn&rsquo;t really want him for anything else, that was already suspicious of people who didn&rsquo;t yearn for the two-kids/white-picket-fence/steady-job dream. He&rsquo;s willing to work, but doesn&rsquo;t like to do the same thing for long, doesn&rsquo;t like authority, and likes to booze and whore and write. He continues to try to publish, but is continually rejected by the only publishing house he considers worthy. He gets involved with Laura and Jan at different times, who have varyingly detrimental effects on his life.</p>
<p>I&rsquo;ve included <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id= 3157">notes, citations and errata</a> in a separate post.</p>
</div></dd>
<dt class="field">Cloud Atlas (2004)</dt>
<dd><div class=" "><p>by <em>David Mitchell</em></p>
<p>This is a well-written and far-reaching book. All the more so considering the many narrators, voices and dialects used for the several distinct sections, each of which also took place at a different time in our past or future. It&rsquo;s written in several parts: the first five parts are from different narrators and each subsequent one picks up the story by somehow mentioning the writings of the previous narrator, however obliquely. Each piece builds on the previous one, laddering up through the years into a future where humanity is reduced to tribes on islands visited by leftover vestiges of more advanced but increasingly desperate humanity. With the middle part of 11, we retreat back through the narrators, in reverse order, until we arrive where we started, having perhaps learned something of humanity&rsquo;s reach and maybe something about souls.</p>
<p>I&rsquo;ve included <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3155">notes, citations and errata</a> in a separate post.</p>
</div></dd>
<dt class="field">Rant: The Oral Biography of Buster Casey (2008)</dt>
<dd><div class=" "><p>by <em>Chuck Palahniuk</em></p>
<p>The story is told through one-line to one-page–long biographical snippets. The story goes from Buster&rsquo;s upbringing in a grindingly poor town, where his young mother teaches him to how to make Easter eggs with wax and boiled vegetable stock. He is an odd child, inuring himself to poison through repeated animal, insect and arachnid bits, collecting old paint cans from old folks, who don&rsquo;t realize they might be full of extremely valuable coins dating back to the mid-1800s, and following the foretellings of an old man who he met once and claimed to be his real father.</p>
<p>He warps the local economy in a way that makes all the townspeople complicit in his scheme, he catches and beats rabies multiple times, all the while spreading it throughout the town, especially the girls who, oddly, can&rsquo;t get enough of him. He takes his ill-gotten gains to the city, where more of the world he inhabits is revealed, in the form of a stark subdivision between night and day shifts for humanity as a way of solving traffic woes, as well as a whole subculture of people organizing crash parties, in which they crash their cars into each other to feel what it&rsquo;s like to really live—something that almost no-one knows now that one can &ldquo;boost peaks&rdquo; from others.</p>
<p>That is, full-bore digital sensory capture is freely available and lulls the populace. And this is very much what it is intended to do, according to some of the later biographical participants—to keep people from discovering that, if you crash your car just right, and you&rsquo;re in just the right theta-wave, meditative state, you will be transported to another place in time, where you can become your own progenitor and increase the power of your current self, until you reach a point where you can kill your own parents, terminate the loop by eliminating the beginning and live forever, suspended in a liminal state. Very much an Infinite-Jest vibe (even a bit of Pynchon at times).</p>
<p>Some wicked cool concepts and intriguing thoughts in this one. Recommended.</p>
<p>I&rsquo;ve included <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3156">notes, citations and errata</a> in a separate post.</p>
</div></dd>
<dt class="field">Mind of My Mind (1977)</dt>
<dd><div class=" "><p>by <em>Octavia Butler</em></p>
<p>This is book two of the Patternist series. The main character of the first part of the book is Doro, a 5000-year–old superbeing with enhanced mental powers. His primary power is the ability to force his way in to another being’s mind, eradicating that mind and replacing it with his own. Doro is beyond human, and views most of humanity as herd animals, for use as he pleases. He started a breeding program many millennia ago with another powerful woman, a shapeshifter and their progeny tend toward superpowers of the psychic kind. <br>
The star of this book is Mary, a distant descendant, who transitions successfully, but in so doing becomes almost more powerful than Doro himself, capable of contacting and leading a whole society of powerful minds. In effect, Doro has succeeded in his program, but his progeny is ready to leave him and his rapacious dog-eat-dog society behind.</p>
<p>I&rsquo;ve included <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3158">notes, citations and errata</a> in a separate post.</p>
</div></dd>
<dt class="field">Perdido Street Station (2001)</dt>
<dd><div class=" "><p>by <em>China Miéville</em></p>
<p>This is the story of Isaac, a thaumaturge/scientist in New Crobuzon, a city described in incredible and sprawling detail by Miéville. He lives with girlfriend Lin, who&rsquo;s an artist. She creates sculptures using special materials that she chews with her mandibles behind her head. You guessed it, she&rsquo;s not human. She&rsquo;s kind of a combination fly/super-sexy woman. You&rsquo;re not allowed to talk about her like that, but that&rsquo;s the most succinct description. </p>
<p>There&rsquo;s also Yagharek, an outcast member of a strict flying species, who commissions Issac to help him fly again—his wings having been ripped from him by the expulsion ceremony. In his investigations, Issac discovers an iridescent caterpillar that turns into one of the most evil, multi-dimensional beings known to Crobuzon. He feeds it dreamshit, a drug made from the shit of the caterpillar&rsquo;s captive full-grown compatriots. This is a bad move. The creature escapes and frees its comrades.</p>
<p>They all begin to prey on the populace of Crobuzon, sucking souls and psyches and just basically bringing the whole mood down. The creatures were deliberately kept by the military of New Crobuzon as a military weapon that is now out of control. Isaac discovers so-called &ldquo;crisis energy&rdquo;, which is kind of analogous to harnessing the power of quantum foam, I guess.</p>
<p>There&rsquo;s also an extra-dimensional spider called Weaver as well as a secretive Council that machinates throughout the city. The book was more intricate than that, but it was also about 800 pages long. Well-written but a bit over-detailed in places.</p>
<p>I&rsquo;ve included <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3159">notes, citations and errata</a> in a separate post.</p>
</div></dd>
<dt class="field">How to Live Safely in a Science-Fictional Universe (2011)</dt>
<dd><div class=" "><p>by <em>Charles Yu</em></p>
<p>Charles Yu digs through baggage from his past in the guise of a real-life time-machine mechanic. The universe in which he lives is kind of a mix of our own plus all sorts of fictive universes. So, for example, Luke Skywalker is a character because, well, he&rsquo;s part of a popular science-fiction world. The novel addresses all sorts of interesting paradoxes, including loops and writing paradoxical warnings to oneself. He harks back to how his father invented the time machine, but failed to profit from it, instead trapping himself in a diorama/time-loop. It was a meandering, interesting and unique book that seemed to have a lot to do with Charles Yu personally, though that was perhaps just the auto-biographical feel.</p>
<p>I&rsquo;ve included <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3177">notes, citations and errata</a> in a separate post.</p>
</div></dd>
<dt class="field">Requiem for a Dream (1978)</dt>
<dd><div class=" "><p>by <em>Hubert Selby Jr.</em></p>
<p>I&rsquo;d already seen the movie and it was relatively faithful to the source material. The book is written in a rambling, near–stream-of-consciousness street patois with little punctuation and structure. The grammar is mostly OK, so you can get used to it, but it&rsquo;s a bit of a challenge at first. Not as much so as the middle chapter in <em>Cloud Atlas</em> but it might still be off-putting for some.</p>
<p>tl;dr: Drugs are bad.</p>
<p>More precisely, addiction is bad. This film is the story of a mother, her son, his girlfriend and their best friend. Nice, huh?</p>
<p>Spoiler alert: the book ends with the mother strapped to a bed in a mental hospital, withdrawing from a severe amphetamine addiction, the son lies in a hospital, his left arm amputated because of a festering needle wound, the best friend is on a work gang in prison, suffering beatings and malnutrition and the girlfriend is curled up on her couch at home, cuddling her scag, earned by performing in a private sex show for her new pimp.</p>
<p>The mother never quite recovered from the death of her husband and the son isn’t around enough to take care of her. She spends her days watching a self-help guru’s infomercial. She gets an invitation to the show but can’t fit into her dress. She resolves to lose weight by the time she gets her actual invitation. After a day spent trying it the old-fashioned way, she makes an appointment with a diet doctor and starts her downward spiral.</p>
<p>The son and his friends are already well on their way, shucking and jiving for enough money to buy a stash for the night. They resolve to follow the junkie dream: they pool their cash and start selling instead of just using everything they have. This actually works OK for a while, but the friend is busted by the cops on a deal and the money they’ve saved is used for bail and nearly gone in one fell swoop. The son and his girlfriend predictably fight over the lack of drugs and he heads out with his friend to Florida to make a big score. She can’t wait that long and calls a dealer who wants women rather than money in exchange for drugs.</p>
<p>I&rsquo;ve included <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3180">notes, citations and errata</a> in a separate post.</p>
</div></dd>
<dt class="field">First As Tragedy, Then As Farce (2009)</dt>
<dd><div class=" "><p>by <em>Slavoj Žižek</em></p>
<p>This is a philosophical/economic discussion of the 2008 financial crash from a wider angle, one that acknowledges the possibility that some of our most seemingly axiomatic notions must be reëxamined. In particular, the notion that capitalism has won—Fukuyama&rsquo;s end of history—and that humanity has found the final expression of itself. That the drive to consume is immanent, that the drive to amass long after one has more than enough is genetic.</p>
<p>This book is not afraid to discuss various expressions of capital and capitalism and to shine a harsh light on the really-existing version that has slipped in in sheep&rsquo;s clothing.</p>
<p>Step one: convince everyone that capitalism is good; remain vague about the definition. Step two: convince everyone that the system that benefits you the most is capitalism. Step three: profit.</p>
<p>Criminalize that which you do not want to do; legalize that which you do, but only with tight strictures so that it applies to yourself. Privatize profit; socialize cost. This system is ridiculously short-lived. As the author says on page 90, <span class="quote-inline">&ldquo;[…] even in the US, the bastion of economic liberalism, capitalism is having to re-invent socialism in order to save itself.&rdquo;</span></p>
<p>Capitalism as practiced today is the greatest con game of all. It&rsquo;s an absolute cruel joke that so many fervently believe in it, while all the time getting screwed by it. It&rsquo;s feudalism dressed up with better marketing.</p>
<p>I&rsquo;ve included <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3179">notes, citations and errata</a> in a separate post.</p>
</div></dd>
<dt class="field">The Three Stigmata of Palmer Eldritch (1965)</dt>
<dd><div class=" "><p>by <em>Philip K. Dick</em></p>
<p>This is one of Dick&rsquo;s trippiest works. He envisions a planet Earth in the future that is too hot to visit during daytime without special cooling gear. Humanity organizes itself to get off-planet. To combat the boring conditions in the colonies, there is a drug called CAN-D that, when taken by groups, allows a shared hallucination. The hallucination approaches reality when it can be anchored on real-life objects, so there is a thriving market for &ldquo;layouts&rdquo;, which are basically intricate dollhouses. The colonists take the drug and subsume themselves into a shared hallucinatory life in the layout.</p>
<p>The story centers on Palmer Eldritch, a heroic but exceedingly odd space traveler who&rsquo;d been lost to a far-off solar system, but who has supposedly returned, Barney Mayerson, a precog who&rsquo;s been drafted as a colonist, Leo Bolero, his boss and owner of the major layout company. Palmer starts peddling CHEW-Z, an even-more powerful alternative to CAN-D that is capable of making people travel inter-dimensionally or hyper-spatially or just condensing time to a dot, so that an entire live can be lived in a so-called real-world instant. Things get really, really trippy with nested layers of reality, non-real layers of reality due to hallucination—shared and individual, as well as complete overtaking of other people&rsquo;s bodies and personae. The precog makes things lively with predictions of assassination, but the intended target is unsure how to prevent an event for which the time-stream isn&rsquo;t even clear.</p>
<p>More details in the <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Three_Stigmata_of_Palmer_Eldritch">Wikipedia entry</a>. If that sounds good to you, then this book is highly recommended. I loved it.</p>
<p>I&rsquo;ve included <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3178">notes, citations and errata</a> in a separate post.</p>
</div></dd>
<dt class="field">Ark (2009)</dt>
<dd><div class=" "><p>by <em>Stephen Baxter</em></p>
<p>At the end of <em>Flood</em>, the planet Earth had been covered in water, right up to the very top of Mt. Everest. The only life left on Earth was floating around on top of the seas, in various states of civilization. This story overlaps the events of <em>Flood</em>, showing preparations for saving humanity in other ways. The primary focus is on an ambitious space program—Ark One—that will launch a spaceship that is destined for another solar system, a decade of traveling distance away. Arks Two and Three are only hinted at, but also exist.</p>
<p>The first part of the book follows the travails of the candidates for the Ark, until its final launch, which doesn&rsquo;t go according to plan, but the technology holds up. Several candidates who were pre-selected don&rsquo;t make it because they are replaced by children of rich and power people. Others are pushed off by members of the military who forced their way onboard at the last moment before launch.</p>
<p>The Earth drowns. The Ark heads for nine years toward Earth II, but it proves to be far less attractive than originally hoped. Factions onboard have gotten more stratified and there are three main paths proposed: settle the planet below, continue onward for 30 more years, to another system, or go back to Earth. They end up doing all three, splitting into three parties, splitting the bolo of two ship bodies that provided gravity.</p>
<p>The group that returns to Earth finds it completely flooded, but they make contact with survivors on the surface as well as in Ark Two, which is on the ocean floor. The group that went onward goes through many tribulations, finally arriving at the destination planet. It&rsquo;s better than Earth II, but troubles along the way lost them a shuttle, so they have to colonize with children to maximize genetic diversity. The colonists settle in, while the survivors on the orbit further.</p>
<p>I&rsquo;ve included <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3181">notes, citations and errata</a> in a separate post.</p>
</div></dd>
<dt class="field">Despair (1934; en/1965) </dt>
<dd><div class=" "><p>by <em>Vladimir Nabakov</em></p>
<p>This is the story of an unreasonably vain Russian man Hermann who meets a homeless man Felix, whom Hermann is convinced is his doppelgänger. Hermann lives with his wife Lydia. He thinks her lovely, pudgy, stupid, but loves her very much. Her cousin Ardalion is also quite close to the family—quite close to her, in ways luridly hinted at. Hermann is in despair with his life and wants to move on, so comes up with the plan to pay Felix to pretend to be him, but then he would kill Felix and allow the world to think Hermann dead. Hermann and Lydia would then abscond with the insurance money. Hermann, it turns out to no-one&rsquo;s surprise is a good deal less clever than he thought. Felix is absolutely not a doppelgänger for him, his plan for the perfect murder is an absolute shambles and Hermann, who escapes to France, is captured soon after. In Hermann&rsquo;s absence, Ardalion swoops in on Lydia.</p>
<p>I&rsquo;ve included <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3182">notes, citations and errata</a> in a separate post.</p>
</div></dd>
<dt class="field">Netherland: A Novel (2008) </dt>
<dd><div class=" "><p>by <em>Joseph O&rsquo;Neill</em></p>
<p>As with <em>Despair</em> by Nabakov, this is kind of a story of a sad man with delusions of grandeur. Because this is a modern novel, though, in Hans van den Broek&rsquo;s case, he is an immensely successful financial analyst living in London with his wife and son. They haven&rsquo;t a worry in the world as far as prosaic concerns, so we are free to focus on their ennui. Most of the novel is experienced as a series of flashbacks from narrator Hans, as he thinks about his life in New York City and about his relationship with the dynamic and mysterious Chuck Ramkissoon, an avid businessman with 1000 irons in the fire as well as the founder of the Staten Island cricket club.</p>
<p>Chuck and the Cricket Club were the only thing that kept Hans going after 9/11 triggered a separation from his wife, who moved back to England with their son. We follow Hans through his memories as he tries to figure out who Chuck was and why his body was discovered handcuffed in the Gowanus river. As to this, we receive no satisfaction, but Hans does end up getting back together with his wife. There is little joy in this because they are both vaguely dissatisfied upper–middle-class people with a seemingly stunted penchant for joy.</p>
<p>I&rsquo;ve included <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3183">notes, citations and errata</a> in a separate post.</p>
</div></dd>
<dt class="field">Gone Girl: A Novel (2012) </dt>
<dd><div class=" "><p>by <em>Gillian Flynn</em></p>
<p>This is the story of Amy, a woman financially privileged from birth, whose parents established their fortune with children&rsquo;s books about &ldquo;Amazing Amy&rdquo;. Amy lives off of a trust fund established by her parents from this fortune. This all has left a mark on Amy. They all live in New York City, where she meets Nick. The book alternates between Amy and Nick&rsquo;s viewpoints, with Amy&rsquo;s entries describing an earnest young lady trying her best to deal with a moody man. Nick, on the other hand, describes himself in the same exact way. Various details that become relevant later are mentioned.</p>
<p>They both lose their jobs in New York. Amy&rsquo;s parents, it turns out, are terrible financial managers and come to Amy, asking for the remainder of her trust fund so that they can pay their bills. With no income and no trust fund, the couple retreats to Nick&rsquo;s hometown, Missouri, where his sister and father still live. Nick opens a bar with his sister using the last of their money and they settle in, more or less, to life in the Midwest. On their tenth wedding anniversary, though, Amy is gone. There are signs of a struggle.</p>
<p>The first half of the book turns out to have been an exceedingly unreliable telling of their lives and in the second half, we learn what really happened. It&rsquo;s quite a neat plot, so I&rsquo;m not going to <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gone_Girl_(novel)">ruin it for anyone</a>.</p>
<p>I&rsquo;ve included <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3184">notes, citations and errata</a> in a separate post.</p>
</div></dd>
<dt class="field">Mr. Mercedes (2008) </dt>
<dd><div class=" "><p>by <em>Stephen King</em></p>
<p>This isn&rsquo;t one of King&rsquo;s best outings, but it was a fun read. It&rsquo;s obviously a Stephen King book from a mile away. You can see his craft in the characters, the pacing and the conclusion. It&rsquo;s the story of a retired police detective Hodges living a sad and lonely life in a small town. He receives a letter from Mr. Mercedes, taunting Hodges that he will never be able to catch him. Who is this Mr. Mercedes? He is the man who ran over several dozen people at a job fair. Hodges was in charge of the case, but wasn&rsquo;t able to solve it before retirement.</p>
<p>Very soon in the novel, Mr. Mercedes is revealed to be a demented young man with delusions, who&rsquo;s now following Hodges as well as planning another strike. He&rsquo;s a typically psychotic mess of a King character. He lives with his alcoholic mother. Bits of his past are revealed throughout, forming a picture of a damaged person damaged further by life.</p>
<p>Olivia Trelawney is the older woman from whom Mercedes borrowed a … Mercedes. She kills herself soon after the attack, feeling guilty that she&rsquo;d contributed, even unwittingly. In his investigation, Hodges meets her lovely sister Janey—another typically powerful female character, well-written—and they hit it off, investigating Mercedes together. Jerome, a young man who helps Hodges around the house, also forces his charming way into the investigation. Most of Janey and Olivia&rsquo;s relatives are exceedingly unpleasant, but Holly, though odd, is also of immense help. Together, they manage to thwart Mr. Mercedes&rsquo;s next attack.<br>
&nbsp;</p>
</div></dd>
<dt class="field">The Martian (2014)</dt>
<dd><div class=" "><p>by <em>Andy Weir</em></p>
<p>This is the story of a mission to Mars, the Ares 3. They are only days into their several-week–long mission before a freak windstorm forces them to abandon and escape by the skin of their teeth back to the Hermes, in orbit around Mars. Unfortunately, the wind tore a satellite antenna from its mooring and propelled it directly through Mark Watney, tearing him away into the howling, sandy darkness of the Martian night.</p>
<p>The crew is bereft, feeling survivor’s guilt. Watney, however, is not dead. He is left alone on the surface of Mars with a lot of technology at his disposal and food for a crew of six. Short-term survival is not a problem. It’s surviving long enough for a resupply mission that’s an issue. With the satellite antenna gone, he can’t even tell NASA that he survived. NASA notices that something is up when they see changes in the camp, so they know he’s alive. They keep this from the Hermes crew, at least at the beginning.</p>
<p>Mark does all sort of neat stuff to survive, described in at-times excruciating detail but very well-written and entertaining nonetheless. The writing started off quite stilted, with very short sentences and about a sixth-grade reading level—if that. About 1/3 of the way through, though, it picked up steam and became quite funny as more characters were introduced. Even Mark’s somewhat flat witticisms become sharper and funnier. I saw the movie before reading the book, but that didn’t ruin anything for me—as psychologists say, anticipation is just as enjoyable as surprise.</p>
<p>He locates and re-enables the Pathfinder in order to use it for communications. He farms potatoes. He re-enables the RTG as a heat source for long missions—like the one to the Area IV landing site on the other side of the planet. He makes it over there, the Hermes mission is extended to come pick him up, he takes the MAV from Ares IV to LMO (Low Mars Orbit) and they miraculously pick him up.</p>
<p>I&rsquo;ve included <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3174">notes, citations and errata</a> in a separate post.</p>
</div></dd>
<dt class="field">Blindness (1995)</dt>
<dd><div class=" "><p>by <em>Jose Saramago</em> (translated to English by <em>Giovanni Pontiero</em>)</p>
<p>The story is of a man who is suddenly struck blind, seeing only a wash of milky whiteness. Others soon follow, as it becomes clear that the blindness is caused by a communicable disease.</p>
<p>Soon enough, everyone has it and the city is filled only with the blind, All, save one lady—the doctor&rsquo;s wife, played by <em>Julianne Moore</em>—who is unaffected by the blindness, but not by its horrific effects (she lives in a world of blind people). The effects are as you can imagine, if you were to think about it: a city filled only with the newly blind, fumbling about, looking for food, looking for shelter, for a place to urinate or defecate. Before everyone has succumbed, the government ruthlessly quarantines the initial afflicted in a mental asylum. Food is delivered sporadically but relatively regularly. The place becomes nearly unbearably filthy.</p>
<p>As more and more people arrive, an element finally arrives that understands that societal rules no longer apply. They take all the food for themselves, rationing it out to the others in exchange for the last of their worldly possessions. When those run out, they naturally demand that the other wards send their women. After several days, the women volunteer for this horrific duty, even the doctor&rsquo;s wife. Afterwards, though, she&rsquo;s had enough and takes a pair of scissors she found to kill the ringleader, threatening the remaining pirates that she will kill more if they don&rsquo;t give up. Another woman, traumatized by the rapes, finds a lighter and sets the pirates&rsquo; den on fire, taking them all out. </p>
<p>At the same time, the doctor&rsquo;s wife takes her small group outside to ask the soldiers for help. They are gone. There is no authority remaining. All is chaos and anarchy, with only the blind to fill the power vacuum. The small group escapes back to the city, the doctor&rsquo;s wife the only witness to the utter horror of the place, overrun by people who can no longer take care of themselves. They survive better than most, with the doctor&rsquo;s wife&rsquo;s sight helping them find food that others have missed. They return to the doctor&rsquo;s home and settle in for a somewhat better existence than they had in quarantine, but one still bereft of true hope. And then, just as quickly as it left, their sight returns. The end.</p>
<p>I&rsquo;ve included <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3200">notes, citations and errata</a> in a separate post.</p>
</div></dd>
<dt class="field">Wyrd Sisters (Discworld Book 6) (1988)</dt>
<dd><div class=" "><p>by <em>Terry Pratchett</em></p>
<p>This story is the Discworld take on Hamlet, more or less. It features Nanny Ogg, Grannie Weatherwax and Magret as the witches three. Duke Felmet of Lancre kills his cousin the King in order to take over the throne. The kingdom is not happy about this. By the kingdom, I mean not necessarily the people—though they feel it too—but the actual kingdom, the ground, the trees, the sky. The kingdom as a being is dissatisfied. The King&rsquo;s son Tomjon survives, to Felmet&rsquo;s chagrin and he bends his considerable powers to finding him.</p>
<p>All to no avail, as the child is whisked off to Ankh Morpork with a troupe of traveling actors. He grows up to be a highly influential actor with an unparalleled power to mesmerize. His adoptive father owns the troupe, his best friend is the dwarf Hwel, an at-time very gifted playwright. Also in the mix is the suspiciously eloquent court Fool, who helps the witches wrest the kingdom from Felmet, which involves flying around the kingdom very quickly on a broom.</p>
<p>I&rsquo;ve included <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id= 3198">notes, citations and errata</a> in a separate post.</p>
</div></dd>
<dt class="field">Wool Omnibus (2011)</dt>
<dd><div class=" "><p>by <em>Hugh Howey</em></p>
<p>Howey originally self-published this work on Amazon but at least the first part suffers much less from a strong editorial hand than other self-published works I&rsquo;ve seen. He spins a good yarn [1], plucking ideas and moods from other genres to weave [2] his own interesting and thrilling murder mystery in a silo that houses an entire society in its 144 floors.</p>
<p>The stratification becomes clear over the course of the stories, which were published serially over the course of more than year. The various power factions and policies are shown to create a working machine, but one that works for a very distinct and not-very-well-publicized purpose.</p>
<p>The story starts with the death of the Silo&rsquo;s sheriff, as he is sent out for &ldquo;cleaning&rdquo;—as his wife before him—as punishment for heresy/thoughtcrime. Next we meet the Silo&rsquo;s Mayor, Jahns, an older woman nearing the end of her career, and her deputy Marnes, also in his sunset years. They seek out and find a new sheriff in Juliette, a very clever Mechanic from the lowest levels of the silo. This brings them into direct contact with Bernard, the power-mad head of IT (level 31). Bernard&rsquo;s &ldquo;shadow&rdquo; (apprentice) is Lukas, a young man with fewer scales on his eyes, who is smitten with Juliette and willing to help her find out more about what the Silo is really for, about how it was created. This, despite the trouble this causes him at work, where Bernard is grooming him for succession. Juliette is eventually banished to cleaning as well, but she uses her connections in Mechanical and Supply to ensure that the journey is not as fatal as usual.</p>
<p>There are some editorial oddities [3] but overall the book is well-written.</p>
<p>I&rsquo;ve included <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id= 3199">notes, citations and errata</a> in a separate post.</p>
</div></dd>
</dl><p><hr></p>
<div class="footnote-reference"><span id="footnote_DRAFTABLE_ENTRY_3127_1_body" class="footnote-number">[1]</span> If you&rsquo;ll pardon the pun.</div><div class="footnote-reference"><span id="footnote_DRAFTABLE_ENTRY_3127_2_body" class="footnote-number">[2]</span> Again.</div><div class="footnote-reference"><span id="footnote_DRAFTABLE_ENTRY_3127_3_body" class="footnote-number">[3]</span> For example, he doesn&rsquo;t seem to know about the verb form &ldquo;had been&rdquo;, instead using &ldquo;were&rdquo; everywhere and making the reader stumble and have to figure out from context that he&rsquo;d intended the non-continuous past participle. At another point, he used &ldquo;leeching&rdquo; to indicate something leaking out insidiously but that&rsquo;s a brand-new meaning of that word and, again, caused a stumble. Even in his bits of code, he used single apostrophes for a unit of dimension (feet) but then all of the characters acted as if he&rsquo;d written double apostrophes (inches). I wasted minutes trying to figure out if that were some hidden meaning I&rsquo;d overlooked, but had to come to the conclusion that it was just a pretty grievous editorial oversight.</div>      </div>
      </div>
        <div class="footer">
    <div class="footer-data"><div class="footer-links"><ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/contact.php" title="">Contact</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/support.php" title="">Support</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/privacy.php" title="">Privacy</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/rights.php" title="">Rights</a></li></ul></div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="copyright">Copyright (c) 1999-2026 earthli.com. All Rights Reserved.</div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="versions">Powered by <ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore/app_news.php">earthli News 3.7</a></li><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore" title="">earthli WebCore&trade; 3.7</a></li></ul></div></div>    </div>
      </div>
  </div>  </body>
</html>
]]>
  </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
      <title type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[Wool by Hugh Howey (2011; read in 2015)]]>
  </title>
    <id>https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3199</id>
    <link href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3199"/>
    <updated>2016-04-20T08:27:54+02:00</updated>
    <author>
        <name type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[Marco von Ballmoos]]>
  </name>
      <uri>https://earthli.com/users/marco</uri>
    </author>
      <summary type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<blockquote class="quote abstract "><div>Disclaimer: these are notes I took while reading this book. They include citations I found interesting or enlightening or particularly well-written. In some cases, I&rsquo;ve pointed out which of these applies to which citation; in others, I have not. Any benefit you gain from reading these notes is... [<a class="complete-text-link" href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3199">More</a>]</div></blockquote>]]>
  </summary>
      <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<html lang="en">
  <head>
    <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/themes/ice.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/fonts/raleway.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/core/medium.css">
  </head>
  <body>
<div class="style-controls">  <div class="page">
    <div class="page-body">
<div class="info-box-top">
<p>
Published by <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_user.php?name=marco" title="Marco von Ballmoos" class="visible">marco</a> on <span class="date-time">20. Apr 2016 08:27:54 (GMT-5)</span>
</p>
<p>
Updated by <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_user.php?name=marco" title="Marco von Ballmoos" class="visible">marco</a> on <span class="date-time">27. Dec 2020 12:45:28 (GMT-5)</span>
</p>
</div>
      <div class="text-flow wide">
  <blockquote class="quote abstract "><div>Disclaimer: these are notes I took while reading this book. They include citations I found interesting or enlightening or particularly well-written. In some cases, I&rsquo;ve pointed out which of these applies to which citation; in others, I have not. Any benefit you gain from reading these notes is purely incidental to the purpose they serve of reminding me what I once read. Please see Wikipedia for a summary if I&rsquo;ve failed to provide one sufficient for your purposes. If my notes serve to trigger an interest in this book, then I&rsquo;m happy for you.</div></blockquote><p>Howey originally self-published this work on Amazon but at least the first part suffers much less from a strong editorial hand than other self-published works I&rsquo;ve seen. He spins a good yarn [1], plucking ideas and moods from other genres to weave [2] his own interesting and thrilling murder mystery in a silo that houses an entire society in its 144 floors.</p>
<p>The stratification becomes clear over the course of the stories, which were published serially over the course of more than year. The various power factions and policies are shown to create a working machine, but one that works for a very distinct and not-very-well-publicized purpose.</p>
<p>The story starts with the death of the Silo&rsquo;s sheriff, as he is sent out for &ldquo;cleaning&rdquo;—as his wife before him—as punishment for heresy/thoughtcrime. Next we meet the Silo&rsquo;s Mayor, Jahns, an older woman nearing the end of her career, and her deputy Marnes, also in his sunset years. They seek out and find a new sheriff in Juliette, a very clever Mechanic from the lowest levels of the silo. This brings them into direct contact with Bernard, the power-mad head of IT (level 31). Bernard&rsquo;s &ldquo;shadow&rdquo; (apprentice) is Lukas, a young man with fewer scales on his eyes, who is smitten with Juliette and willing to help her find out more about what the Silo is really for, about how it was created. This, despite the trouble this causes him at work, where Bernard is grooming him for succession. Juliette is eventually banished to cleaning as well, but she uses her connections in Mechanical and Supply to ensure that the journey is not as fatal as usual.</p>
<h2>Citations</h2><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;They nodded to the duo as they passed through the cafeteria and wished them a different sort of unspoken luck. Keep us going, their eyes said. Make it so my kids live as long as me. Don’t let it unravel, not just yet.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 43</div></div><p>That&rsquo;s everyone&rsquo;s fervent hope.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;“That’s a pump,” he said. “Oil well. It’s how you read at night.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 77</div></div><p>How do they even have a word for night anymore?</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Juliette felt inordinate pressure for everything to work. She was the one who had come up with the idea to do a refit. She calmed herself with reassurances that it was the right thing to do and that the worst that could happen now was that the holiday would be extended until they sorted out all the kinks. That was much better than a catastrophic failure years from now.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 110</div></div><p>I know that feeling.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;she continued to make adjustments, zeroing out all the corrections that had built up over the years. They were starting from the ground up, none of the patches and fixes of old to disguise any new symptoms. A fresh start.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 111</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;He wondered if McLain saw him as a brute, storming up here with delusions of justice. She was old enough to consider him young, he realized. Young and hot tempered, while he thought of himself as being old and wise.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 260</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Maybe it was the proximity of death talking, the reaper buffeting her clear helmet with sand and toxins. What did any of it matter, seeing how wide and full the world was? Her silo would probably go on. Other silos surely would.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 469</div></div>      </div>
      </div>
        <div class="footer">
    <div class="footer-data"><div class="footer-links"><ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/contact.php" title="">Contact</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/support.php" title="">Support</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/privacy.php" title="">Privacy</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/rights.php" title="">Rights</a></li></ul></div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="copyright">Copyright (c) 1999-2026 earthli.com. All Rights Reserved.</div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="versions">Powered by <ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore/app_news.php">earthli News 3.7</a></li><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore" title="">earthli WebCore&trade; 3.7</a></li></ul></div></div>    </div>
      </div>
  </div>  </body>
</html>
]]>
  </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
      <title type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[Wyrd Sisters (Discworld Book 6) by Terry Pratchett (read in 2015)]]>
  </title>
    <id>https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3198</id>
    <link href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3198"/>
    <updated>2016-04-20T08:21:50+02:00</updated>
    <author>
        <name type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[Marco von Ballmoos]]>
  </name>
      <uri>https://earthli.com/users/marco</uri>
    </author>
      <summary type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<blockquote class="quote abstract "><div>Disclaimer: these are notes I took while reading this book. They include citations I found interesting or enlightening or particularly well-written. In some cases, I&rsquo;ve pointed out which of these applies to which citation; in others, I have not. Any benefit you gain from reading these notes is... [<a class="complete-text-link" href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3198">More</a>]</div></blockquote>]]>
  </summary>
      <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<html lang="en">
  <head>
    <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/themes/ice.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/fonts/raleway.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/core/medium.css">
  </head>
  <body>
<div class="style-controls">  <div class="page">
    <div class="page-body">
<div class="info-box-top">
<p>
Published by <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_user.php?name=marco" title="Marco von Ballmoos" class="visible">marco</a> on <span class="date-time">20. Apr 2016 08:21:50 (GMT-5)</span>
</p>
</div>
      <div class="text-flow wide">
  <blockquote class="quote abstract "><div>Disclaimer: these are notes I took while reading this book. They include citations I found interesting or enlightening or particularly well-written. In some cases, I&rsquo;ve pointed out which of these applies to which citation; in others, I have not. Any benefit you gain from reading these notes is purely incidental to the purpose they serve of reminding me what I once read. Please see Wikipedia for a summary if I&rsquo;ve failed to provide one sufficient for your purposes. If my notes serve to trigger an interest in this book, then I&rsquo;m happy for you.</div></blockquote><p>This story is the Discworld take on Hamlet, more or less. It features Nanny Ogg, Grannie Weatherwax and Magret as the witches three. Duke Felmet of Lancre kills his cousin the King in order to take over the throne. The kingdom is not happy about this. By the kingdom, I mean not necessarily the people—though they feel it too—but the actual kingdom, the ground, the trees, the sky. The kingdom as a being is dissatisfied. The King&rsquo;s son Tomjon survives, to Felmet&rsquo;s chagrin and he bends his considerable powers to finding him.</p>
<p>All to no avail, as the child is whisked off to Ankh Morpork with a troupe of traveling actors. He grows up to be a highly influential actor with an unparalleled power to mesmerize. His adoptive father owns the troupe, his best friend is the dwarf Hwel, an at-time very gifted playwright. Also in the mix is the suspiciously eloquent court Fool, who helps the witches wrest the kingdom from Felmet, which involves flying around the kingdom very quickly on a broom.</p>
<h2>Citations</h2><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Most people aren’t. They live their lives as a sort of temporal blur around the point where their body actually is—anticipating the future, or holding onto the past. They’re usually so busy thinking about what happens next that the only time they ever find out what is happening now is when they come to look back on it. Most people are like this. They learn how to fear because they can actually tell, down at the subconscious level, what is going to happen next. It’s already happening to them.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 128-132</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The Fool’s bells tinkled as he sorted through his cards. Without thinking, he said: “Oh, a sub-sect of the Turnwise Klatch philosophical system of Sumtin, noted for its simple austerity and the offer of personal tranquillity and wholeness achieved through meditation and breathing techniques; an interesting aspect is the asking of apparently nonsensical questions in order to widen the doors of perception.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 395-398</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;“Oh, obvious,” said Granny. “I’ll grant you it’s obvious. Trouble is, just because things are obvious doesn’t mean they’re true.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 427-429</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;“If I’d had to buy you, you wouldn’t be worth the price.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 710-711</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;No, things like crowns had a troublesome effect on clever folk; it was best to leave all the reigning to the kind of people whose eyebrows met in the middle when they tried to think.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 1589-1591</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Kings and such are killing one another the whole time. Their kingdoms just make the best of it. How come this one takes offense all of a sudden?” “It’s been here a long time,” said Granny. “So’s everywhere,” said Nanny, and added, with the air of a lifetime student, “Everywhere’s been where it is ever since it was first put there. It’s called geography.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 1839-1843</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;He stiffened. “You’re wondering whether I really would cut your throat,” panted Magrat. “I don’t know either. Think of the fun we could have together, finding out.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 2289-2291</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;She’d thought him weak under a thin shell of strength, but it went a lot further than that. Somewhere deep inside his mind, somewhere beyond the event horizon of rationality, the sheer pressure of insanity had hammered his madness into something harder than diamond.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 2395-2397</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;“You tell me history is what people are told?” said the duchess. The Fool looked around the throne room and found King Gruneberry the Good (906-967). “Was he?” he said, pointing. “Who knows, now? What was he good at? But he will be Gruneberry the Good until the end of the world.” The duke was leaning forward in his throne, his eyes gleaming. “I want to be a good ruler,” he said. “I want people to like me. I would like people to remember me fondly.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 2736-2742</div></div><p>Why?</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;“But that’s just people’s perception,” she said. “Isn’t it?” “Oh, yes,” said Granny, “of course it is. It all is. What difference does that make?”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 2893-2895</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;As she plunged down toward the forest roof in a long shallow dive she reflected that there was possibly something complimentary in the way Granny Weatherwax resolutely refused to consider other people’s problems. It implied that, in her considerable opinion, they were quite capable of sorting them out by themselves.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 2976-2979</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Somewhere in the middle of it Nanny Ogg floated, taking the occasional pull from a hip flask as a preventative against the chill. And thus it was that Granny, her hat and iron-gray hair dripping with moisture, her boots shedding lumps of ice, heard the distant and muffled sound of a voice enthusiastically explaining to the invisible sky that the hedgehog had less to worry over than just about any other mammal.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 3039-3042</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;For the first time a flicker of doubt invaded Granny Weatherwax’s mind, puzzled to find itself in such unfamiliar surroundings.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 3176-3177</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Hwel looked unsteadily into his mug. Drunkenness had this to be said for it, it stopped the flow of inspirations.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 3613-3614</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Words were indeed insubstantial. They were as soft as water, but they were also as powerful as water and now they were rushing over the audience, eroding the levees of veracity, and carrying away the past.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 4494-4496</div></div>      </div>
      </div>
        <div class="footer">
    <div class="footer-data"><div class="footer-links"><ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/contact.php" title="">Contact</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/support.php" title="">Support</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/privacy.php" title="">Privacy</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/rights.php" title="">Rights</a></li></ul></div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="copyright">Copyright (c) 1999-2026 earthli.com. All Rights Reserved.</div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="versions">Powered by <ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore/app_news.php">earthli News 3.7</a></li><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore" title="">earthli WebCore&trade; 3.7</a></li></ul></div></div>    </div>
      </div>
  </div>  </body>
</html>
]]>
  </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
      <title type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[The Martian by Andy Weir (read in 2015)]]>
  </title>
    <id>https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3174</id>
    <link href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3174"/>
    <updated>2016-04-20T08:11:23+02:00</updated>
    <author>
        <name type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[Marco von Ballmoos]]>
  </name>
      <uri>https://earthli.com/users/marco</uri>
    </author>
      <summary type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<blockquote class="quote abstract "><div>Disclaimer: these are notes I took while reading this book. They include citations I found interesting or enlightening or particularly well-written. In some cases, I&rsquo;ve pointed out which of these applies to which citation; in others, I have not. Any benefit you gain from reading these notes is... [<a class="complete-text-link" href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3174">More</a>]</div></blockquote>]]>
  </summary>
      <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<html lang="en">
  <head>
    <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/themes/ice.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/fonts/raleway.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/core/medium.css">
  </head>
  <body>
<div class="style-controls">  <div class="page">
    <div class="page-body">
<div class="info-box-top">
<p>
Published by <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_user.php?name=marco" title="Marco von Ballmoos" class="visible">marco</a> on <span class="date-time">20. Apr 2016 08:11:23 (GMT-5)</span>
</p>
<p>
Updated by <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_user.php?name=marco" title="Marco von Ballmoos" class="visible">marco</a> on <span class="date-time">20. Apr 2016 08:20:11 (GMT-5)</span>
</p>
</div>
      <div class="text-flow wide">
  <blockquote class="quote abstract "><div>Disclaimer: these are notes I took while reading this book. They include citations I found interesting or enlightening or particularly well-written. In some cases, I&rsquo;ve pointed out which of these applies to which citation; in others, I have not. Any benefit you gain from reading these notes is purely incidental to the purpose they serve of reminding me what I once read. Please see Wikipedia for a summary if I&rsquo;ve failed to provide one sufficient for your purposes. If my notes serve to trigger an interest in this book, then I&rsquo;m happy for you.</div></blockquote><p>This is the story of a mission to Mars, the Ares 3. They are only days into their several-week–long mission before a freak windstorm forces them to abandon and escape by the skin of their teeth back to the Hermes, in orbit around Mars. Unfortunately, the wind tore a satellite antenna from its mooring and propelled it directly through Mark Watney, tearing him away into the howling, sandy darkness of the Martian night.</p>
<p>The crew is bereft, feeling survivor&rsquo;s guilt. Watney, however, is not dead. He is left alone on the surface of Mars with a lot of technology at his disposal and food for a crew of six. Short-term survival is not a problem. It&rsquo;s surviving long enough for a resupply mission that&rsquo;s an issue. With the satellite antenna gone, he can&rsquo;t even tell NASA that he survived. NASA notices that something is up when they see changes in the camp, so they know he&rsquo;s alive. They keep this from the Hermes crew, at least at the beginning.</p>
<p>Mark does all sort of neat stuff to survive, described in at-times excruciating detail but very well-written and entertaining nonetheless. The writing started off quite stilted, with very short sentences and about a sixth-grade reading level—if that. About 1/3 of the way through, though, it picked up steam and became quite funny as more characters were introduced. Even Mark&rsquo;s somewhat flat witticisms become sharper and funnier. I saw the movie before reading the book, but that didn&rsquo;t ruin anything for me—as psychologists say, anticipation is just as enjoyable as surprise.</p>
<p>He locates and re-enables the Pathfinder in order to use it for communications. He farms potatoes. He re-enables the RTG as a heat source for long missions—like the one to the Area IV landing site on the other side of the planet. He makes it over there, the Hermes mission is extended to come pick him up, he takes the MAV from Ares IV to LMO (Low Mars Orbit) and they miraculously pick him up.</p>
<h2>Citations</h2><p>In this next piece, I laughed out loud at the Chinese response,</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>"My people have enjoyed working with your advance team,&ldquo; Guo Ming said. &ldquo;The last month has been very interesting. Attaching an American Probe to a Chinese booster. I believe this is the first time it&rsquo;s ever been done.&rdquo;</p>
<p>&ldquo;It just goes to show,&rdquo; Teddy said,. &ldquo;Love of science is universal across all cultures.&rdquo;</p>
<p>Guo Ming nodded. &ldquo;My people have especially commented on the work ethic of your man, Mitch Henderson. He is very dedicated.&rdquo;</p>
<p>&ldquo;He&rsquo;s a pain in the ass,&rdquo; Teddy said.</p>
<p>Su Bin paused before translating but pressed on.</p>
<p>Guo Ming laughed. &ldquo;You can say that,&rdquo; he said. &ldquo;I cannot.&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 247</div></div><p>Where Weir deviates a bit from reality (I think) is that many of the officials from the Chinese Space Agency required translators, even though China has the most English-speaking residents of any country in the world. If pretty much anyone graduating university in China <em>today</em> speaks English fluently, then I would imagine that the space program of the near future there would be staffed 100% by people who speak English. The movie deviated even farther in order to alienate the Chinese: in the book, their command center is pretty much the same as that in Houston. In the movie, the Americans tell the Chinese that their stuff is way out of date and that they&rsquo;ll have to help them upgrade it. Kinda racist. No idea why they felt they had to do that. Didn&rsquo;t really gibe with the rest of the movie.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Mars is not Earth. It doesn&rsquo;t have a thick atmosphere to bend light and carry particles that reflect light around corners. It&rsquo;s damn near a vacuum here. Once the sun isn&rsquo;t visible, I&rsquo;m in the dark. Phobos gives me some moonlight, but not enough to work with. Deimos is a little piece of crap that&rsquo;s no good to anyone.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 316–317</div></div><p>That is a spot-on description of my two rabbits, Pierre and Louis, respectively.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>[19:24] MAV: What took them so long to let us talk?<br>
[19:25] JOHANSSEN: The psych team was worried about personality conflicts.<br>
[19:25] MAV: What&rdquo; Just &lsquo;cause you guys abandoned me on a godforsaken planet with no chance of survival?<br>
[19:26] JOHANSSEN: Funny. Don&rsquo;t make that kind of joke with Lewis.<br>
[19:27] MAV: Roger. So uh … thanks for coming back to get me.<br>
[19:27] JOHANSSEN: It&rsquo;s the least we could do. How is the MAV retrofit going?<br>
[19:28] MAV: So far, so good. NASA put a lot of thought into the procedures. They work. That&rsquo;s not to say they&rsquo;re easy. I spent the last 3 days removing Hull Panel 19 and the front window. Even in Mars-g they&rsquo;re heavy motherfuckers.<br>
[19:29] JOHANSSEN: When we pick you up, I will make wild, passionate love to you. <strong>Prepare your body.</strong><br>
[19:29] JOHANSSEN: I didn&rsquo;t type that! That was Martinez! I stepped away from the console for like 10 seconds!<br>
[19:29] MAV: I&rsquo;ve really missed you guys.</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 336–337</div></div><p>That&rsquo;s a pretty funny passage. However, Johanssen is the IT tech for the flight—the super-hacker. Super-hackers do not leave their terminals without locking them. Ever. Still, funny.</p>
<p>Another funny one that made it more-or-less verbatim into the movie.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>"Hey,&ldquo; Watney said over the radio, &ldquo;I&rsquo;ve got an idea.&rdquo;<br>
&ldquo;Of course you do,&rdquo; Lewis said. &ldquo;What do you got?&rdquo;<br>
&ldquo;I could find something sharp in here and poke a hole in the glove of my EVA suit. I could use the escaping air as a thruster and fly my way to you. The source of thrust would be on my arm, so I&rsquo;d be able to direct it pretty easily.&rdquo;<br>
&ldquo;How does he come up with this shit?&rdquo; Martinez interjected.<br>
&ldquo;Hmm,&rdquo; Lewis said. &ldquo;Could you get forty-two meters per second that way?&rdquo;<br>
&ldquo;No idea,&rdquo; Watney said.<br>
&ldquo;I can&rsquo;t see you having any control if you did that,&rdquo; Lewis said. &ldquo;You&rsquo;d be eyeballing the intercept and using a thrust vector you can barely control.&rdquo;<br>
&ldquo;I admit it&rsquo;s fatally dangerous,&rdquo; Watney said. &ldquo;But consider this: I&rsquo;d get to fly around like Iron Man.&rdquo;<br>
&ldquo;We&rsquo;ll keep working on ideas,&rdquo; Lewis said.<br>
<strong>&ldquo;Iron Man, Commander. <em>Iron Man.</em>&rdquo;</strong></p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 352–353</div></div><p>After the MAV made it into orbit,</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;Little remained of the canvas. Tatters floated along the edge of the hole it once covered. This granted Watney an unobstructed view of Mars from orbit. The red planet&rsquo;s crater-pocked surface stretched out seemingly forever, its thin atmosphere a slight blur along the edge. Only eighteen people in history had personally seen this view.</p>
<p>&ldquo;&ldquo;Fuck you,&rdquo; he said to the planet below.&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 351</div></div><p>The book tried to sell us on the power of the human spirit that makes billions pull together to save one guy. I think it&rsquo;s more like boredom with the humdrum uselessness of our daily lives. Saving a guy on another planet is a challenge that is just <em>better</em> than what you were doing before. It&rsquo;s not that you really want to save Mark Watney, but that you want to do something cool and no-one can fault you if you do something cool instead of what you&rsquo;re supposed to be doing when it&rsquo;s to save a famous man&rsquo;s life.</p>
      </div>
      </div>
        <div class="footer">
    <div class="footer-data"><div class="footer-links"><ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/contact.php" title="">Contact</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/support.php" title="">Support</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/privacy.php" title="">Privacy</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/rights.php" title="">Rights</a></li></ul></div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="copyright">Copyright (c) 1999-2026 earthli.com. All Rights Reserved.</div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="versions">Powered by <ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore/app_news.php">earthli News 3.7</a></li><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore" title="">earthli WebCore&trade; 3.7</a></li></ul></div></div>    </div>
      </div>
  </div>  </body>
</html>
]]>
  </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
      <title type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[Gone Girl: A Novel by Gillian Flynn (read in 2015)]]>
  </title>
    <id>https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3184</id>
    <link href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3184"/>
    <updated>2016-04-20T07:39:20+02:00</updated>
    <author>
        <name type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[Marco von Ballmoos]]>
  </name>
      <uri>https://earthli.com/users/marco</uri>
    </author>
      <summary type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<blockquote class="quote abstract "><div>Disclaimer: these are notes I took while reading this book. They include citations I found interesting or enlightening or particularly well-written. In some cases, I&rsquo;ve pointed out which of these applies to which citation; in others, I have not. Any benefit you gain from reading these notes is... [<a class="complete-text-link" href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3184">More</a>]</div></blockquote>]]>
  </summary>
      <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<html lang="en">
  <head>
    <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/themes/ice.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/fonts/raleway.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/core/medium.css">
  </head>
  <body>
<div class="style-controls">  <div class="page">
    <div class="page-body">
<div class="info-box-top">
<p>
Published by <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_user.php?name=marco" title="Marco von Ballmoos" class="visible">marco</a> on <span class="date-time">20. Apr 2016 07:39:20 (GMT-5)</span>
</p>
<p>
Updated by <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_user.php?name=marco" title="Marco von Ballmoos" class="visible">marco</a> on <span class="date-time">20. Apr 2016 08:20:21 (GMT-5)</span>
</p>
</div>
      <div class="text-flow wide">
  <blockquote class="quote abstract "><div>Disclaimer: these are notes I took while reading this book. They include citations I found interesting or enlightening or particularly well-written. In some cases, I&rsquo;ve pointed out which of these applies to which citation; in others, I have not. Any benefit you gain from reading these notes is purely incidental to the purpose they serve of reminding me what I once read. Please see Wikipedia for a summary if I&rsquo;ve failed to provide one sufficient for your purposes. If my notes serve to trigger an interest in this book, then I&rsquo;m happy for you.</div></blockquote><p>This is the story of Amy, a woman financially privileged from birth, whose parents established their fortune with children&rsquo;s books about &ldquo;Amazing Amy&rdquo;. Amy lives off of a trust fund established by her parents from this fortune. This all has left a mark on Amy. They all live in New York City, where she meets Nick. The book alternates between Amy and Nick&rsquo;s viewpoints, with Amy&rsquo;s entries describing an earnest young lady trying her best to deal with a moody man. Nick, on the other hand, describes himself in the same exact way. Various details that become relevant later are mentioned.</p>
<p>They both lose their jobs in New York. Amy&rsquo;s parents, it turns out, are terrible financial managers and come to Amy, asking for the remainder of her trust fund so that they can pay their bills. With no income and no trust fund, the couple retreats to Nick&rsquo;s hometown, Missouri, where his sister and father still live. Nick opens a bar with his sister using the last of their money and they settle in, more or less, to life in the Midwest. On their tenth wedding anniversary, though, Amy is gone. There are signs of a struggle.</p>
<p>The first half of the book turns out to have been an exceedingly unreliable telling of their lives and in the second half, we learn what really happened. It&rsquo;s quite a neat plot, so I&rsquo;m not going to <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gone_Girl_(novel)">ruin it for anyone</a>.</p>
<h2>Citations</h2><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;He’s doing what you tell him to do because he doesn’t care enough to argue, I think. Your petty demands simply make him feel superior, or resentful, and someday he will fuck his pretty, young coworker who asks nothing of him, and you will actually be shocked. Give me a man with a little fight in him, a man who calls me on my bullshit. (But who also kind of likes my bullshit.) And yet: Don’t land me in one of those relationships where we’re always pecking at each other, disguising insults as jokes, rolling our eyes and “playfully” scrapping in front of our friends, hoping to lure them to our side of an argument they could not care less about. Those awful if only relationships: This marriage would be great if only … and you sense the if only list is a lot longer than either of them realizes. So I know I am right not to settle, but it doesn’t make me feel better as my friends pair off and I stay home on Friday night with a bottle of wine and make myself an extravagant meal and tell myself, This is perfect, as if I’m the one dating me. As I go to endless rounds of parties and bar nights, perfumed and sprayed and hopeful, rotating myself around the room like some dubious dessert.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 39</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;I’ve gotten so retro, at one point I will probably use the word pocketbook, shuffling out the door in my swingy tweed coat, my lips painted red, on the way to the beauty parlor.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 52</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;[…] always with autumn colors in the background, as if the school were based not in a town but in a month. October.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 110</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;You are turning me into what I never have been and never wanted to be, a nag, because you are not living up to your end of a very basic compact. Don’t do that, it’s not okay to do.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 116</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Of course that’s what we have to do, and of course if he had presented the problem to me like I wasn’t his enemy, that’s what I would have said. But he came out of the door already treating me like a problem that needed to be dealt with. I was the bitter voice that needed to be squelched.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 135</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Do you remember when Insley and her dancing-monkey husband made us come over to admire their baby, and we did the obligatory visit to their strangely perfect, overflowered, overmuffined house for brunch and baby-meeting and they were so self-righteous and patronizing of our childless state, and meanwhile there was their hideous boy, covered in streaks of slobber and stewed carrots and maybe some feces—naked except for a frilly bib and a pair of knitted booties—&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 149</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The building was heavy-hot, almost fuzzy, like the inside of a mattress. Three of us had giant camping flashlights, the glow illuminating jarring images: It was suburbia, post-comet, post-zombie, post-humanity. A set of muddy shopping-cart tracks looped crazily along the white flooring. A raccoon chewed on a dog treat in the entry to a women’s bathroom, his eyes flashing like dimes.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 154</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;My parents’ cherished heirloom looks ridiculous in the new house. But then all our New York stuff does. Our dignified elephant of a chesterfield with its matching baby ottoman sits in the living room looking stunned, as if it got sleep-darted in its natural environment and woke up in this strange new captivity, surrounded by faux-posh carpet and synthetic wood and unveined walls.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 161</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;I have a mistress. Now is the part where I have to tell you I have a mistress and you stop liking me. If you liked me to begin with. I have a pretty, young, very young mistress, and her name is Andie. I know. It’s bad.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 193</div></div><p>Surprise surprise. And no, we didn&rsquo;t like you.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Go jabbed me in the sternum with two hard fingers. “Don’t you fucking pull that with me, Lance. ‘Oh, girls get so overexcited.’ That’s bullshit. You are in a really bad place, my friend. Get your head out of your ass and start helping me fix this.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 216</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;For over a year now, I’ve smelled her twat on his fingertips as he slipped into bed next to me. I’ve watched him ogle himself in the mirror, grooming himself like a horny baboon for their dates. I’ve listened to his lies, lies, lies—from simplistic child’s fibs to elaborate Rube Goldbergian contraptions. I’ve tasted butterscotch on his dry-kiss lips, a cloying flavor that was never there before. I’ve felt the stubble on his cheeks that he knows I don’t like but apparently she does. I’ve suffered betrayal with all five senses. For over&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 316</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;And then I’d picture him with her, in her stripper thong, letting him degrade her because she was pretending to be Cool Girl, she was pretending to love blow jobs and football and getting wasted. And I’d think, I am married to an imbecile. I’m married to a man who will always choose that, and when he gets bored with this dumb twat, he’ll just find another girl who is pretending to be that girl, and he’ll never have to do anything hard in his life. Resolve stiffened.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 320</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Americans like what is easy, and it’s easy to like pregnant women—they’re like ducklings or bunnies or dogs. Still, it baffles me that these self-righteous, self-enthralled waddlers get such special treatment. As if it’s so hard to spread your legs and let a man ejaculate between them. You know what is hard? Faking a pregnancy.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 346</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;“You are a man,” I say. “You are an average, lazy, boring, cowardly, woman-fearing man. Without me, that’s what you would have kept on being, ad nauseam. But I made you into something. You were the best man you’ve ever been with me. And you know it. The only time in your life you’ve ever liked yourself was pretending to be someone I might like. Without me? You’re just your dad.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 529</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Me, Nick Dunne, the man who used to forget so many details, is now the guy who replays conversations to make sure I didn’t offend, to make sure I never hurt her feelings. I write down everything about her day, her likes and dislikes, in case she quizzes me. I am a great husband because I am very afraid she may kill me.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 543</div></div>      </div>
      </div>
        <div class="footer">
    <div class="footer-data"><div class="footer-links"><ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/contact.php" title="">Contact</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/support.php" title="">Support</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/privacy.php" title="">Privacy</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/rights.php" title="">Rights</a></li></ul></div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="copyright">Copyright (c) 1999-2026 earthli.com. All Rights Reserved.</div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="versions">Powered by <ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore/app_news.php">earthli News 3.7</a></li><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore" title="">earthli WebCore&trade; 3.7</a></li></ul></div></div>    </div>
      </div>
  </div>  </body>
</html>
]]>
  </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
      <title type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[Netherland: A Novel by Joseph O'Neill (read in 2015)]]>
  </title>
    <id>https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3183</id>
    <link href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3183"/>
    <updated>2016-04-20T07:25:31+02:00</updated>
    <author>
        <name type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[Marco von Ballmoos]]>
  </name>
      <uri>https://earthli.com/users/marco</uri>
    </author>
      <summary type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<blockquote class="quote abstract "><div>Disclaimer: these are notes I took while reading this book. They include citations I found interesting or enlightening or particularly well-written. In some cases, I&rsquo;ve pointed out which of these applies to which citation; in others, I have not. Any benefit you gain from reading these notes is... [<a class="complete-text-link" href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3183">More</a>]</div></blockquote>]]>
  </summary>
      <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<html lang="en">
  <head>
    <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/themes/ice.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/fonts/raleway.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/core/medium.css">
  </head>
  <body>
<div class="style-controls">  <div class="page">
    <div class="page-body">
<div class="info-box-top">
<p>
Published by <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_user.php?name=marco" title="Marco von Ballmoos" class="visible">marco</a> on <span class="date-time">20. Apr 2016 07:25:31 (GMT-5)</span>
</p>
<p>
Updated by <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_user.php?name=marco" title="Marco von Ballmoos" class="visible">marco</a> on <span class="date-time">20. Apr 2016 07:40:53 (GMT-5)</span>
</p>
</div>
      <div class="text-flow wide">
  <blockquote class="quote abstract "><div>Disclaimer: these are notes I took while reading this book. They include citations I found interesting or enlightening or particularly well-written. In some cases, I&rsquo;ve pointed out which of these applies to which citation; in others, I have not. Any benefit you gain from reading these notes is purely incidental to the purpose they serve of reminding me what I once read. Please see Wikipedia for a summary if I&rsquo;ve failed to provide one sufficient for your purposes. If my notes serve to trigger an interest in this book, then I&rsquo;m happy for you.</div></blockquote><p>As with <em>Despair</em> by Nabakov, this is kind of a story of a sad man with delusions of grandeur. Because this is a modern novel, though, in Hans van den Broek&rsquo;s case, he is an immensely successful financial analyst living in London with his wife and son. They haven&rsquo;t a worry in the world as far as prosaic concerns, so we are free to focus on their ennui. Most of the novel is experienced as a series of flashbacks from narrator Hans, as he thinks about his life in New York City and about his relationship with the dynamic and mysterious Chuck Ramkissoon, an avid businessman with 1000 irons in the fire as well as the founder of the Staten Island cricket club.</p>
<p>Chuck and the Cricket Club were the only thing that kept Hans going after 9/11 triggered a separation from his wife, who moved back to England with their son. We follow Hans through his memories as he tries to figure out who Chuck was and why his body was discovered handcuffed in the Gowanus river. As to this, we receive no satisfaction, but Hans does end up getting back together with his wife. There is little joy in this because they are both vaguely dissatisfied upper–middle-class people with seemingly a stunted penchant for joy.</p>
<h2>Citations</h2><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;[…] the beauty of cricket played on a lawn of appropriate dimensions, where the white-clad ring of infielders, swanning figures on the vast oval, again and again converge in unison toward the batsman and again and again scatter back to their starting points, a repetition of pulmonary rhythm, as if the field breathed through its luminous visitors.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 9</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Also, the sheer variety of foodstuffs bothered him. “One night it’s Cantonese, then it’s Georgian, then it’s Indonesian, then Syrian. I mean, I think this shit is good baklava, but what the fuck do I know, really? How can I be sure?” Yet when he wrote, Vinay exuded bright certainty and expertise. As I repeatedly went forth with him and began to understand the ignorance and contradictions and language difficulties with which he contended, and the doubtful sources of his information and the seemingly bottomless history and darkness out of which the dishes of New York emerge, the deeper grew my suspicion that his work finally consisted of minting or perpetuating and in any event circulating misconceptions about his subject and in this way adding to the endless perplexity of the world.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 51</div></div><p>His readers take him at his word. he isn&rsquo;t lying. just wrong. When you see how he operates you know that in him trust is misplaced. It&rsquo;s like the difference in trust you have for software you wrote yourself and software you bought.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Chuck valued craftiness and indirection. He found the ordinary run of dealings between people boring and insufficiently advantageous to him at the deep level of strategy at which he liked to operate. He believed in owning the impetus of a situation, in keeping the other guy off balance, in proceeding by way of sidesteps.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 71</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;was torn between a ridiculous loathing of this obdurate wintry ectoplasm and an equally ridiculous tenderness stimulated by a solid’s battle against the forces of liquefaction.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 94</div></div><p>I&rsquo;m not really of huge fan of overt thesaurus writing, especially when it&rsquo;s this obvious. It&rsquo;s a fine line, though, I know.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;was torn between a ridiculous loathing of this obdurate wintry ectoplasm and an equally ridiculous tenderness stimulated by a solid’s battle against the forces of liquefaction. Random mental commotions of this kind constantly agitated me during this period,&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 94</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Each of her soothing utterances battered me more grievously than the last—as if I were traveling in a perverse ambulance whose function was to collect a healthy man and steadily damage him in readiness for the hospital at which a final and terrible injury would be inflicted.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 189</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;could see what had happened. I had knocked him off his pedestal. I had called into question his exercise of the New Yorker’s ultimate privilege: of holding yourself out in a way that, back home, would be taken as a misrepresentation.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 212</div></div><p>Chuck kind of reminds me of some guys I&rsquo;ve met, who brag about everything under the sun, but who actually have some facts to back up the bragging.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The exploit struck me, chewing mutton under the sun, as possessing a tantalizing metaphysical significance; and it isn’t an overstatement, I believe, to say that this train of thought, though of course inconclusive and soon reduced to nothing more than nostalgia for the adventure books of my childhood,&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 217</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;She half apologized one evening. “I’m sorry. I just find it oppressive being an economy. The nanny”—we’d hired an English-speaking Assamese woman to babysit for Jake for a few hours every morning—“the drivers, the waiters, the deck chair boys, all these people selling stuff on the beach…I mean, every stupid spending decision we make has a huge impact on their lives.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 222</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Oh yeah? I wanted to say. Get back to me when you’re grossing ten thousand dollars per working day, asshole.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 225</div></div><p>A gauche reminder that our hero has essentially zero problems compared to most.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Ronald McDonald drew back. Then he again came forward enormously, head first, turning in the draft so that his rigid beckoning arm swung round in a slow haymaker that scattered a mesmerized shoal of bystanders and ultimately connected with a fellow trying to film the debacle with a cell phone. That man fell to the ground, as did the police officer next to him who was trying to apprehend the fantastic yolk-yellow mitt with his bare hands, this last fall provoking a ducking young officer to draw his gun and point it at the amok Ronald McDonald, which led to a fresh burst of screams and panicky running and mass diving onto the asphalt and Eliza grabbing my arm.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 234</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;[…] examining the shadow in the wine bottle and dispensing one half of the shadow into each of our glasses.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 238</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;I am too tired to explain that I don’t agree—to say that, however much of a disappointment Chuck may have been at the end, there were many earlier moments when this was not the case and that I see no good reason why his best self-manifestations should not be the basis of one’s final judgment. We all disappoint, eventually.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 249</div></div>      </div>
      </div>
        <div class="footer">
    <div class="footer-data"><div class="footer-links"><ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/contact.php" title="">Contact</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/support.php" title="">Support</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/privacy.php" title="">Privacy</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/rights.php" title="">Rights</a></li></ul></div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="copyright">Copyright (c) 1999-2026 earthli.com. All Rights Reserved.</div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="versions">Powered by <ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore/app_news.php">earthli News 3.7</a></li><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore" title="">earthli WebCore&trade; 3.7</a></li></ul></div></div>    </div>
      </div>
  </div>  </body>
</html>
]]>
  </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
      <title type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[Despair by Vladimir Nabokov (read in 2015)]]>
  </title>
    <id>https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3182</id>
    <link href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3182"/>
    <updated>2016-04-20T07:15:29+02:00</updated>
    <author>
        <name type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[Marco von Ballmoos]]>
  </name>
      <uri>https://earthli.com/users/marco</uri>
    </author>
      <summary type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<blockquote class="quote abstract "><div>Disclaimer: these are notes I took while reading this book. They include citations I found interesting or enlightening or particularly well-written. In some cases, I&rsquo;ve pointed out which of these applies to which citation; in others, I have not. Any benefit you gain from reading these notes is... [<a class="complete-text-link" href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3182">More</a>]</div></blockquote>]]>
  </summary>
      <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<html lang="en">
  <head>
    <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/themes/ice.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/fonts/raleway.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/core/medium.css">
  </head>
  <body>
<div class="style-controls">  <div class="page">
    <div class="page-body">
<div class="info-box-top">
<p>
Published by <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_user.php?name=marco" title="Marco von Ballmoos" class="visible">marco</a> on <span class="date-time">20. Apr 2016 07:15:29 (GMT-5)</span>
</p>
<p>
Updated by <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_user.php?name=marco" title="Marco von Ballmoos" class="visible">marco</a> on <span class="date-time">20. Apr 2016 07:28:57 (GMT-5)</span>
</p>
</div>
      <div class="text-flow wide">
  <blockquote class="quote abstract "><div>Disclaimer: these are notes I took while reading this book. They include citations I found interesting or enlightening or particularly well-written. In some cases, I&rsquo;ve pointed out which of these applies to which citation; in others, I have not. Any benefit you gain from reading these notes is purely incidental to the purpose they serve of reminding me what I once read. Please see Wikipedia for a summary if I&rsquo;ve failed to provide one sufficient for your purposes. If my notes serve to trigger an interest in this book, then I&rsquo;m happy for you.</div></blockquote><p>This is the story of an unreasonably vain Russian man Hermann who meets a homeless man Felix, whom Hermann is convinced is his doppelgänger. Hermann lives with his wife Lydia. He thinks her lovely, pudgy, stupid, but loves her very much. Her cousin Ardalion is also quite close to the family—quite close to her, in ways luridly hinted at. Hermann is in despair with his life and wants to move on, so comes up with the plan to pay Felix to pretend to be him, but then he would kill Felix and allow the world to think Hermann dead. Hermann and Lydia would then abscond with the insurance money. Hermann, it turns out to no-one&rsquo;s surprise is a good deal less clever than he thought. Felix is absolutely not a doppelgänger for him, his plan for the perfect murder is an absolute shambles and Hermann, who escapes to France, is captured soon after. In Hermann&rsquo;s absence, Ardalion swoops in on Lydia.</p>
<h2>Citations</h2><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The ecstatic love of a young writer for the old writer he will be some day is ambition in its most laudable form. This love is not reciprocated by the older man in his larger library, for even if he does recall with regret a naked palate and a rheumless eye, he has nothing but an impatient shrug for the bungling apprentice of his youth.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 2</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;These opinions of hers stand as stiff as statues in their niches.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 22</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Giving her a letter to post was equal to throwing it into the river, leaving the rest to the acumen of the stream and the recipient’s piscatorial leisure.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 26</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;[…] and a very simple world it was, with the greatest complication in it amounting to a search for the telephone number which she had jotted down on one of the pages of a library book, borrowed by the very person whom she wished to ring up.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 26</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Thus we sat and I kept up my persuasive drone; I am a bad speaker, and the oration which I seem to render word by word did not flow with the lissom glide it has on paper. Indeed, it is not really possible to set down my incoherent speech, that tumble and jumble of words, the forlornness of subordinated clauses, which have lost their masters and strayed away, and all the superfluous gibber that gives words a support or a creep hole; but my mind worked so rhythmically and pursued its quarry at such a steady pace, that the impression now left me by the trend of my own words is anything but tangled or garbled. My object, however, was still out of reach. The fellow’s&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 89</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;There is yet another reason why I cannot, nor wish to, believe in God: the fairy tale about him is not really mine, it belongs to strangers, to all men; it is soaked through by the evil-smelling effluvia of millions of other souls that have spun about a little under the sun and then burst; it swarms with primordial fears; there echoes in it a confused choir of numberless voices striving to drown one another; I hear in it the boom and pant of the organ, the roar of the orthodox deacon, the croon of the cantor, Negroes wailing, the flowing eloquency of the Protestant preacher, gongs, thunderclaps, spasms of epileptic women; I see shining through it the pallid pages of all philosophies like the foam of long-spent waves; it is foreign to me, and odious and absolutely useless.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 101</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;If the deed is planned and performed correctly, then the force of creative art is such, that were the criminal to give himself up on the very next morning, none would believe him, the invention of art containing far more intrinsical truth than life’s reality.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 122</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;all this was revealed by the fact that even the official definitions in the brief list of personal features did not quite correspond with the epithets in my own passport (left at home). A trifle to be sure, but a characteristic one.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 173</div></div><p>He thinks himself amazing in all ways, and his wife faithful, himself affluent and bright and successful. even his resemblance to Felix is invented and exaggerated. He even thinks his wife loves him enough to not run off with Ardalion and the insurance money.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Apart, alone, surrounded by cork oaks, stood a decent-looking hotel, the greater part still shuttered (the season beginning only in summer). A strong wind from Spain worried the chick fluff of the mimosas. In a pavilion, reminding one of a chapel, a spring of curative water gushed, and cobwebs hung in the corners of its ruby dark windows.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 181</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;And I was unspeakably shocked by the tone of the thing: it was in fact so improper, so impossible in regard to me, that for a moment I even thought it might refer to a person bearing the same name as I; for such a tone is used when writing of some halfwit hacking to bits a whole family. I understand now. It was, I guess, a ruse on the part of the international police; a silly attempt to frighten and rattle me;&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 185</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;expressed their surprise at my having hoped to deceive the world simply by dressing up in my clothes an individual who was not in the least like me. The imbecility and blatant unfairness of such reasoning are highly comic. The next logical step was to make me mentally deficient; they even went so far as to suppose I was not quite sane and certain persons knowing me confirmed this—that ass Orlovius among others (wonder who the others were), his story being that I used to write letters to myself (rather unexpected).&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 191</div></div>      </div>
      </div>
        <div class="footer">
    <div class="footer-data"><div class="footer-links"><ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/contact.php" title="">Contact</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/support.php" title="">Support</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/privacy.php" title="">Privacy</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/rights.php" title="">Rights</a></li></ul></div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="copyright">Copyright (c) 1999-2026 earthli.com. All Rights Reserved.</div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="versions">Powered by <ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore/app_news.php">earthli News 3.7</a></li><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore" title="">earthli WebCore&trade; 3.7</a></li></ul></div></div>    </div>
      </div>
  </div>  </body>
</html>
]]>
  </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
      <title type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[Ark by Stephen Baxter (read in 2015)]]>
  </title>
    <id>https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3181</id>
    <link href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3181"/>
    <updated>2016-04-19T23:40:28+02:00</updated>
    <author>
        <name type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[Marco von Ballmoos]]>
  </name>
      <uri>https://earthli.com/users/marco</uri>
    </author>
      <summary type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<blockquote class="quote abstract "><div>Disclaimer: these are notes I took while reading this book. They include citations I found interesting or enlightening or particularly well-written. In some cases, I&rsquo;ve pointed out which of these applies to which citation; in others, I have not. Any benefit you gain from reading these notes is... [<a class="complete-text-link" href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3181">More</a>]</div></blockquote>]]>
  </summary>
      <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<html lang="en">
  <head>
    <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/themes/ice.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/fonts/raleway.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/core/medium.css">
  </head>
  <body>
<div class="style-controls">  <div class="page">
    <div class="page-body">
<div class="info-box-top">
<p>
Published by <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_user.php?name=marco" title="Marco von Ballmoos" class="visible">marco</a> on <span class="date-time">19. Apr 2016 23:40:28 (GMT-5)</span>
</p>
<p>
Updated by <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_user.php?name=marco" title="Marco von Ballmoos" class="visible">marco</a> on <span class="date-time">20. Apr 2016 08:20:40 (GMT-5)</span>
</p>
</div>
      <div class="text-flow wide">
  <blockquote class="quote abstract "><div>Disclaimer: these are notes I took while reading this book. They include citations I found interesting or enlightening or particularly well-written. In some cases, I&rsquo;ve pointed out which of these applies to which citation; in others, I have not. Any benefit you gain from reading these notes is purely incidental to the purpose they serve of reminding me what I once read. Please see Wikipedia for a summary if I&rsquo;ve failed to provide one sufficient for your purposes. If my notes serve to trigger an interest in this book, then I&rsquo;m happy for you.</div></blockquote><p>At the end of <em>Flood</em>, the planet Earth had been covered in water, right up to the very top of Mt. Everest. The only life left on Earth was floating around on top of the seas, in various states of civilization. This story overlaps the events of <em>Flood</em>, showing preparations for saving humanity in other ways. The primary focus is on an ambitious space program—Ark One—that will launch a spaceship that is destined for another solar system, a decade of traveling distance away. Arks Two and Three are only hinted at, but also exist.</p>
<p>The first part of the book follows the travails of the candidates for the Ark, until its final launch, which doesn&rsquo;t go according to plan, but the technology holds up. Several candidates who were pre-selected don&rsquo;t make it because they are replaced by children of rich and power people. Others are pushed off by members of the military who forced their way onboard at the last moment before launch.</p>
<p>The Earth drowns. The Ark heads for nine years toward Earth II, but it proves to be far less attractive than originally hoped. Factions onboard have gotten more stratified and there are three main paths proposed: settle the planet below, continue onward for 30 more years, to another system, or go back to Earth. They end up doing all three, splitting into three parties, splitting the bolo of two ship bodies that provided gravity.</p>
<p>The group that returns to Earth finds it completely flooded, but they make contact with survivors on the surface as well as in Ark Two, which is on the ocean floor. The group that went onward goes through many tribulations, finally arriving at the destination planet. It&rsquo;s better than Earth II, but troubles along the way lost them a shuttle, so they have to colonize with children to maximize genetic diversity. The colonists settle in, while the survivors on the orbit further.</p>
<h2>Citations</h2><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;“And if you can’t cope with that,” said the boy next to Kelly, twisting back, “you can go back to the kiddie schools and play with the plastic bricks. There’s always somebody ready to take your place.” He grinned. “Don Meisel. Who the hell are you?”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 52</div></div><p>This feels like a clone of Ender&rsquo;s Game.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The government was considering sending troops into the Friedmanburgs, the troubled new cities on the Great Plains, where residents were protesting against exploitation by the rich who had bought up the land and funded much of the development in the first place.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 57</div></div><p>I think it&rsquo;s relatively safe to say where Baxter&rsquo;s politics lie: with Ms. Ayn Rand.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;which was still remote from this place, and frightened of the waves of eye-dees for the dirt and disease and hunger they brought and the space they used up, and people were frightened of each other, for in the&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 59</div></div><p>He&rsquo;s pretty relentless on this line of &ldquo;useless eye-dees&rdquo;. Didn&rsquo;t they find Liu among the refugees?</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Holle frowned. “And though we might exclude religion, we can’t leave religiosity behind.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 66</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;a school full of rich kjds—only one of whom was chosen from the refugees—and they&rsquo;re all dedicated and smart? Mr. Baxter, you are using a cudgel. Oh! And no religion, too? Do you need a minute alone?&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 66</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Holle recognized a lot of the faces around her, including the rich men and women of LaRei, some of them parents of Academy students themselves.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 69</div></div><p>See?</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The air was already hot. The aircon was juddery, even here in the Capitol building. Everything was breaking down.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 93</div></div><p>This reminded me strongly of the meeting at NASA in <em>Interstellar</em>, though I&rsquo;m not sure which would have inspired which.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;But they lost control of the main entrance and there’s some kind of pitched battle going on around the old school group entrance. You wouldn’t believe it, that it’s come to this.” “That’s the flood for you,” Patrick said. “It reaches us all, in the end.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 121</div></div><p>Baxter is telling the woeful story of the rich and the greedy, ungrateful—and happily faceless—poor grasping at resources they didn&rsquo;t earn.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;There were people everywhere, confronting lines of cops and National Guard troopers.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 123</div></div><p>Baxter doesn&rsquo;t see a need to provide a reason as to why these troops are so loyal.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;“See that pillar of smoke over there?” Kenzie said harshly. “The State Capitol building burning to the ground. These people make me sick. They should be building fucking rafts. Not taking it out on the cops or smashing stuff up or screaming at a bunch of kids.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 125</div></div><p>Thirty percent into this book and still no sign of counterbalancing from the author. I&rsquo;m losing hope that he&rsquo;s faking this viewpoint to make a point.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Holle didn’t even think about it. She hurled herself into the struggling mob.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 126</div></div><p>Good training, Holly! Ammirite?</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;[…] all that would actually hook these kids’ interest in something other than food and swimming games and each other’s pretty bodies. Thandie suspected Boris’s brain was dissolving like those of the rest of his generation.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 335</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;But, Grace thought, all this planet-hunting and exponentiating scientific theorizing had nothing to do with the complex human reality unfolding within the shabby walls of the Ark.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 351</div></div><p>It&rsquo;s above as below: the majority live out their mean little lives, acting as support system for the individuals that drag the race forward.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;“Odd matches. We’re supposedly fleeing from a flood, but Earth II was in a constellation called the River. Flood, river? To find our destination in the starscape you look for Orion—and yet we claim that we were launched from Earth by a drive also called Orion. Zane argues that these name matches are symptoms of a lazy design regime. Or maybe they are clues smuggled in by some dissident sim designer to help us figure out the truth of our situation.” “It’s just coincidence!” “No such thing as coincidence in Zane’s world. Only conspiracies. There’s more. To find where we’ve come from you look back at Opiuchus, the serpent-bearer. That part of the sky is blanked out, so you can’t see Sol, the home of man. But why the serpent-bearer? Zane has been into the archive and he found an account of Ouroboros, a myth of ancient Egypt, a serpent endlessly devouring its own tail. So, Zane says, what we see behind us isn’t any kind of warp cone but the mouth of Ouroboros, continually devouring our fake reality, just as a fresh reality is continually constructed ahead of us to give us the illusion of movement.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 362</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Magda pointed at Holle and screamed, “You left my baby to die! You left her to die! All you had to do was reach out—” She struggled, but Grace held on tightly. The strength went out of Magda, and she broke down into wretched sobbing. “I’ll never forgive you for saving me rather than her, Groundwater. Never.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 409</div></div><p>The problem with Baxter is that he never addresses the elephant in the room: why bother saving a humanity that so often ends in such stupidity? There is literally zero philosophy in this book and it&rsquo;s crying out for it.</p>
      </div>
      </div>
        <div class="footer">
    <div class="footer-data"><div class="footer-links"><ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/contact.php" title="">Contact</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/support.php" title="">Support</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/privacy.php" title="">Privacy</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/rights.php" title="">Rights</a></li></ul></div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="copyright">Copyright (c) 1999-2026 earthli.com. All Rights Reserved.</div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="versions">Powered by <ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore/app_news.php">earthli News 3.7</a></li><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore" title="">earthli WebCore&trade; 3.7</a></li></ul></div></div>    </div>
      </div>
  </div>  </body>
</html>
]]>
  </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
      <title type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[The Three Stigmata of Palmer Eldritch by Philip K. Dick (read in 2015)]]>
  </title>
    <id>https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3178</id>
    <link href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3178"/>
    <updated>2016-04-19T07:28:52+02:00</updated>
    <author>
        <name type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[Marco von Ballmoos]]>
  </name>
      <uri>https://earthli.com/users/marco</uri>
    </author>
      <summary type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<blockquote class="quote abstract "><div>Disclaimer: these are notes I took while reading this book. They include citations I found interesting or enlightening or particularly well-written. In some cases, I&rsquo;ve pointed out which of these applies to which citation; in others, I have not. Any benefit you gain from reading these notes is... [<a class="complete-text-link" href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3178">More</a>]</div></blockquote>]]>
  </summary>
      <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<html lang="en">
  <head>
    <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/themes/ice.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/fonts/raleway.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/core/medium.css">
  </head>
  <body>
<div class="style-controls">  <div class="page">
    <div class="page-body">
<div class="info-box-top">
<p>
Published by <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_user.php?name=marco" title="Marco von Ballmoos" class="visible">marco</a> on <span class="date-time">19. Apr 2016 07:28:52 (GMT-5)</span>
</p>
<p>
Updated by <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_user.php?name=marco" title="Marco von Ballmoos" class="visible">marco</a> on <span class="date-time">20. Apr 2016 08:20:53 (GMT-5)</span>
</p>
</div>
      <div class="text-flow wide">
  <blockquote class="quote abstract "><div>Disclaimer: these are notes I took while reading this book. They include citations I found interesting or enlightening or particularly well-written. In some cases, I&rsquo;ve pointed out which of these applies to which citation; in others, I have not. Any benefit you gain from reading these notes is purely incidental to the purpose they serve of reminding me what I once read. Please see Wikipedia for a summary if I&rsquo;ve failed to provide one sufficient for your purposes. If my notes serve to trigger an interest in this book, then I&rsquo;m happy for you.</div></blockquote><p>This is one of Dick&rsquo;s trippiest works. He envisions a planet Earth in the future that is too hot to visit during daytime without special cooling gear. Humanity organizes itself to get off-planet. To combat the boring conditions in the colonies, there is a drug called CAN-D that, when taken by groups, allows a shared hallucination. The hallucination approaches reality when it can be anchored on real-life objects, so there is a thriving market for &ldquo;layouts&rdquo;, which are basically intricate dollhouses. The colonists take the drug and subsume themselves into a shared hallucinatory life in the layout.</p>
<p>The story centers on Palmer Eldritch, a heroic but exceedingly odd space traveler who&rsquo;d been lost to a far-off solar system, but who has supposedly returned, Barney Mayerson, a precog who&rsquo;s been drafted as a colonist, Leo Bolero, his boss and owner of the major layout company. Palmer starts peddling CHEW-Z, an even-more powerful alternative to CAN-D that is capable of making people travel inter-dimensionally or hyper-spatially or just condensing time to a dot, so that an entire live can be lived in a so-called real-world instant. Things get really, really trippy with nested layers of reality, non-real layers of reality due to hallucination—shared and individual, as well as complete overtaking of other people&rsquo;s bodies and personae. The precog makes things lively with predictions of assassination, but the intended target is unsure how to prevent an event for which the time-stream isn&rsquo;t even clear.</p>
<p>More details in the <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Three_Stigmata_of_Palmer_Eldritch">Wikipedia entry</a>. If that sounds good to you, then this book is highly recommended. I loved it.</p>
<h2>Citations</h2><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The elevator arrived. The doors slid aside. Inside the elevator waited four men and two women, silently. All of them were Palmer Eldritch. Men and women alike: artificial arm, stainless steel teeth … the gaunt, hollowed-out gray face with Jensen eyes.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 194</div></div><p>Reminiscent of agent smith in the matrix.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;I&rsquo;ve walked into and out of a million of them, these so-called &lsquo;translation&rsquo; worlds; I&rsquo;ve seen them all. And you know what they are? They&rsquo;re nothing. Like a captive white rat feeding electric impulses again and again to specific areas of his brain—it&rsquo;s disgusting.&ldquo; &ldquo;I see,&rdquo; Barney Mayerson said. &ldquo;You want to wind up in one of them, knowing this?&rdquo; After a time Barney said, &ldquo;Sure.&rdquo;&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 206</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Our opponent, something admittedly ugly and foreign that entered one of our race like an ailment during the long voyage between Terra and Prox … and yet it knew much more than I did about the meaning of our finite lives, here; it saw in perspective. From its centuries of vacant drifting as it waited for some kind of life form to pass by which it could grab and become … maybe that&rsquo;s the source of its knowledge: not experience but unending solitary brooding.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 214</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;She walked back to him, her eyes dark and shaded, without light. &ldquo;When you grabbed me, to take that bindle of Chew-Z; you know what I saw? I mean actually saw, not just believed.&rdquo; &ldquo;An artificial hand. And a distortion of my jaw. And my eyes—&rdquo; &ldquo;Yes,&rdquo; she said tightly. &ldquo;The mechanical, slitted eyes. What did it mean?&rdquo; Barney said, &ldquo;It meant that you were seeing into absolute reality. The essence beyond the mere appearance.&rdquo; In your terminology, he thought, what you saw is called—stigmata.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 221</div></div>      </div>
      </div>
        <div class="footer">
    <div class="footer-data"><div class="footer-links"><ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/contact.php" title="">Contact</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/support.php" title="">Support</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/privacy.php" title="">Privacy</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/rights.php" title="">Rights</a></li></ul></div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="copyright">Copyright (c) 1999-2026 earthli.com. All Rights Reserved.</div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="versions">Powered by <ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore/app_news.php">earthli News 3.7</a></li><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore" title="">earthli WebCore&trade; 3.7</a></li></ul></div></div>    </div>
      </div>
  </div>  </body>
</html>
]]>
  </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
      <title type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[First As Tragedy, Then As Farce by Slavoj Žižek (read in 2015)]]>
  </title>
    <id>https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3179</id>
    <link href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3179"/>
    <updated>2016-04-18T23:10:10+02:00</updated>
    <author>
        <name type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[Marco von Ballmoos]]>
  </name>
      <uri>https://earthli.com/users/marco</uri>
    </author>
      <summary type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<blockquote class="quote abstract "><div>Disclaimer: these are notes I took while reading this book. They include citations I found interesting or enlightening or particularly well-written. In some cases, I&rsquo;ve pointed out which of these applies to which citation; in others, I have not. Any benefit you gain from reading these notes is... [<a class="complete-text-link" href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3179">More</a>]</div></blockquote>]]>
  </summary>
      <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<html lang="en">
  <head>
    <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/themes/ice.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/fonts/raleway.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/core/medium.css">
  </head>
  <body>
<div class="style-controls">  <div class="page">
    <div class="page-body">
<div class="info-box-top">
<p>
Published by <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_user.php?name=marco" title="Marco von Ballmoos" class="visible">marco</a> on <span class="date-time">18. Apr 2016 23:10:10 (GMT-5)</span>
</p>
<p>
Updated by <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_user.php?name=marco" title="Marco von Ballmoos" class="visible">marco</a> on <span class="date-time">18. Apr 2016 23:10:43 (GMT-5)</span>
</p>
</div>
      <div class="text-flow wide">
  <blockquote class="quote abstract "><div>Disclaimer: these are notes I took while reading this book. They include citations I found interesting or enlightening or particularly well-written. In some cases, I&rsquo;ve pointed out which of these applies to which citation; in others, I have not. Any benefit you gain from reading these notes is purely incidental to the purpose they serve of reminding me what I once read. Please see Wikipedia for a summary if I&rsquo;ve failed to provide one sufficient for your purposes. If my notes serve to trigger an interest in this book, then I&rsquo;m happy for you.</div></blockquote><p>This is a philosophical/economic discussion of the 2008 financial crash from a wider angle, one that acknowledges the possibility that some of our most seemingly axiomatic notions must be reëxamined. In particular, the notion that capitalism has won—Fukuyama&rsquo;s end of history—and that humanity has found the final expression of itself. That the drive to consume is immanent, that the drive to amass long after one has more than enough is genetic.</p>
<p>This book is not afraid to discuss various expressions of capital and capitalism and to shine a harsh light on the really-existing version that has slipped in in sheep&rsquo;s clothing.</p>
<p>Step one: convince everyone that capitalism is good; remain vague about the definition. Step two: convince everyone that the system that benefits you the most is capitalism. Step three: profit.</p>
<p>Criminalize that which you do not want to do; legalize that which you do, but only with tight strictures so that it applies to yourself. Privatize profit; socialize cost. This system is ridiculously short-lived. As the author says on page 90, <span class="quote-inline">&ldquo;[…] even in the US, the bastion of economic liberalism, capitalism is having to re-invent socialism in order to save itself.&rdquo;</span></p>
<p>Capitalism as practiced today is the greatest con game of all. It&rsquo;s an absolute cruel joke that so many fervently believe in it, while all the time getting screwed by it. It&rsquo;s feudalism dressed up with better marketing.</p>
<h2>Citations</h2><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;If it believed in its own nature, would it try to hide that nature under the appearance of an alien nature and seek its salvation in hypocrisy and sophism? The modern ancien régime is rather merely the clown of a world order whose real heroes are dead. History is thorough and passes through many stages while bearing an ancient form to its grave. The last phase of a world-historical form is its comedy.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 2</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Long ago, John Maynard Keynes rendered this self-referentiality nicely when he compared the stock market to a silly competition in which the participants have to pick several pretty girls from a hundred photographs, the winner being the one who chooses girls closest to the average opinion: “It is not a case of choosing those which, to the best of one’s judgment, are really the prettiest, nor even those which average opinion genuinely thinks the prettiest. We have reached the third degree where we devote our intelligence to anticipating what average opinion expects the average opinion to be.”1 So, we are forced to choose without having at our disposal the knowledge that would enable a qualified choice, or, as John Gray put it: “We are forced to live as if we were free.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 10</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The way the market fundamentalists react to the destructive results of implementing their recipes is typical of utopian “totalitarians”: they blame all failure on the compromises of those who realized their schemes (there was still too much state intervention, etc.), and demand nothing less than an even more radical implementation of their doctrines.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 19</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The true problem lies elsewhere: namely; how to keep people’s faith in capitalism alive when the inexorable reality of a crisis has brutally crushed such dreams? Here enters the need for a “mature” realistic pragmatism: one should heroically resist dreams of perfection and happiness and accept bitter capitalist reality as the best (or the least bad) of all possible worlds.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 26</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Clearly, Greenspan’s error was not only and not simply one of overestimating the rationality of market agents—that is, their ability to resist the temptation of making wild speculative gains. What he forgot to include in the equation was the financial speculators’ quite rational expectation that the risks would be worth taking, since, in the event of a financial collapse, they could count on the state to cover their losses.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 30</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;This, however, only makes the enigma even more impenetrable: how is this displacement possible? “Stupidity” and “ideological manipulation” are not adequate answers; that is to say, it is clearly not good enough to claim that the primitive lower classes have been so brainwashed by the ideological apparatus that they are not or are no longer able to identify their true interests.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 33</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;In other words, the temptation to “morph” legitimate business into a pyramid scheme is part of the very nature of the capitalist circulation process. There is no exact point at which the Rubicon was crossed and the legitimate business morphed into an illegal scheme; the very dynamic of capitalism blurs the frontier between “legitimate” investment and “wild” speculation, because capitalist investment is, at its very core, a risky wager that a scheme will turn out to be profitable, an act of borrowing from the future. A sudden uncontrollable shift in circumstances can ruin a supposedly “safe” investment—this is what capitalist “risk” turns on. And, in “postmodern” capitalism, potentially ruinous speculation is raised to a much higher level than was even imaginable in earlier periods.22&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 36</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;. The diagnostic that Lacan poses for the malaise of civilization is that knowledge has assumed ‘a disproportionate growth in relationship to the effects of power.’”45 In the fall of 2007, a public debate raged in the Czech Republic concerning the installation of US Army radars on Czech territory; although a large majority of the population (around 70 percent) was opposed to it, the government pushed on with the project. Government representatives rejected calls for a referendum, arguing that one does not make decisions about such sensitive national security matters merely by voting—they should be left to the military experts.46 If one follows this logic through to the end, one arrives at a strange result: what is there, then, left to vote about? Should not economic decisions, for example, be left to economic experts, and so on for all other realms?&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 62</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;There is, however, a feature conspicuously missing from this series: namely, the injunction to choose when we lack the basic cognitive coordinates needed to make a rational choice. As Leonardo Padura puts it: “It is horrific not to know the past and yet be able to impact on the future”;48 being compelled to make decisions in a situation which remains opaque is our basic condition.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 63</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The first involves a false universality: the subject advocates freedom or equality, while being unaware of implicit qualifications which, in their very form, constrain its scope (the privileging of certain social strata: being rich, or male, or belonging to a certain culture, etc.). The second involves a false identification of both the nature of the antagonism and the enemy: class struggle is displaced, for instance, onto the struggle against the Jews, so that popular rage at being exploited is redirected away from capitalist relations as such and onto the “Jewish plot.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 66</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;In the case of the “Jew” as the fascistic fetish, the interpretive demystification is much more difficult (thereby confirming the clinical insight that a fetishist cannot be undermined with an interpretation of the “meaning” of his fetish—fetishists feel satisfied in their fetishes, they experience no need to be rid of them). In practical political terms, this means that it is almost impossible to “enlighten” an exploited worker who blames “the Jews” for his misery—explaining to him how the “Jew” is the wrong enemy, promoted by his true enemy (the ruling class) in order to obscure the true struggle—and thus to direct his attention away from “Jews” and towards “capitalists.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 68</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;One should unconditionally resist the temptation to “understand” Arab anti-Semitism (where we really encounter it) as a “natural” reaction to the sad plight of the Palestinians: there should be no “understanding” of the fact that in several Arab countries Hitler is still considered a hero by many, or of the fact that in their primary school textbooks all the traditional anti-Semitic myths are recycled, from the notorious forgery The Protocols of the Elders of Zion to the idea that Jews use the blood of Christian (or Arab) children for sacrificial purposes.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 69</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Liberals like to point out similarities between Left and Right “extremisms”: Hitler’s terror and death camps imitated Bolshevik terror and the Gulags; the Leninist form of the party is kept alive today in al-Qaeda—yes, but what does all this mean? It can also be read as an indication of how fascism literally replaces (takes the place of) Leftist revolution: its rise is the Left’s failure, but simultaneously a proof that there was a revolutionary potential, a dissatisfaction, which the Left was not able to mobilize. And does the same not hold for so-called “Islamo-Fascism”? Is the rise of radical Islamism not exactly correlative to the disappearance of the secular Left in Muslim countries?&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 73</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The ongoing financial meltdown demonstrates how difficult it is to disturb the thick undergrowth of utopian premises which determine our acts. As Alain Badiou succinctly put it: The ordinary citizen must “understand” that it is impossible to make up the shortfall in social security, but that it is imperative to stuff untold billions into the banks’ financial hole? We must somberly accept that no one imagines any longer that it’s possible to nationalize a factory hounded by competition, a factory employing thousands of workers, but that it is obvious to do so for a bank made penniless by speculation?&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 79</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Saving endangered species, saving the planet from global warming, saving AIDS patients and those dying for lack of funds for expensive treatments, saving the starving children . . . all this can wait a little bit. The call to “save the banks!” by contrast, is an unconditional imperative which must be met with immediate action. The panic was so absolute that a transnational and non-partisan unity was immediately established, all grudges between world leaders being momentarily forgotten in order to avert the catastrophe.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 80</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Having analyzed data from more than 20 states, the researchers from Cambridge and Yale established a clear correlation between loans made to these states by the IMF and the rise in cases of tuberculosis—once the loans stop, the TB epidemics recede. The explanation for this apparently weird correlation is simple: the condition for getting IMF loans is that the recipient state has to introduce “financial discipline,” i.e., reduce public spending; and the first victim of measures destined to reestablish “financial health” is health itself, in other words, spending on public health services. The space then opens up for Western humanitarians to bemoan the catastrophic condition of the medical services in these countries and to offer help in the form of charity.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 81</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;seems clear that this is not a short-term issue which can be quickly overcome with the appropriate market regulation, but is rather the sign of a long-term problem impossible to solve by means of the market economy. Some apologists for the new world order point out that the lack of food is in itself an indicator of material progress, since people in the fast-developing Third World countries earn more and so can afford to eat more. The problem nonetheless is that this new demand for food pushes millions towards starvation in those countries lacking such fast economic growth.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 84</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The communist hypothesis remains the right hypothesis, as I have said, and I do not see any other. If this hypothesis should have to be abandoned, then it is not worth doing anything in the order of collective action. Without the perspective of communism, without this Idea, nothing in the historical and political future is of such a kind as to interest the philosopher. Each individual can pursue their private business, and we won’t mention it again. … But holding on to the Idea, the existence of the hypothesis, does not mean that its first form of presentation, focused on property and the state, must be maintained just as it is. In fact, what we are ascribed as a philosophical task, we could say even a duty, is to help a new modality of existence of the hypothesis to come into being. New in terms of the type of political experimentation to which this hypothesis could give rise.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 87</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;A simple but pertinent question arises here: if liberal-democratic capitalism obviously works better than all known alternatives, if liberal-democratic capitalism is, if not the best, then at least the least worst form of society, why do we not simply resign ourselves to it in a mature way, even accept it wholeheartedly?&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 88</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The only true question today is: do we endorse the predominant naturalization of capitalism, or does today’s global capitalism contain antagonisms which are sufficiently strong to prevent its indefinite reproduction? There are four such antagonisms: the looming threat of an ecological catastrophe; the inappropriateness of the notion of private property in relation to so-called “intellectual property”; the socio-ethical implications of new techno-scientific developments (especially in biogenetics); and, last but not least, the creation of new forms of apartheid, new Walls and slums.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 90</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;[…] even in the US, the bastion of economic liberalism, capitalism is having to re-invent socialism in order to save itself&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 96</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;This is why, upon a closer look, it becomes clear that what Hugo Chávez has begun doing in Venezuela differs markedly from the standard liberal form of inclusion: Chávez is not including the excluded in a pre-existing liberal-democratic framework; he is, on the contrary, taking the “excluded” dwellers of favelas as his base and then reorganizing political space and political forms of organization so that the latter will “fit” the excluded. Pedantic and abstract as it may appear, this difference—between “bourgeois democracy” and “dictatorship of the proletariat”—is crucial.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 102</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;As some social analysts and economists have suggested, the contemporary explosion of economic productivity confronts us with the ultimate case of this rule: the coming global economy will tend towards a state in which only 20 percent of the labor force are able to do all the necessary work, so that 80 percent of people will be basically irrelevant and of no use, thus potentially unemployed.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 103</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;As this logic reaches its extreme, would it not be reasonable to bring it to its self-negation: is not a system which renders 80 percent of people irrelevant and useless itself irrelevant and of no use? Toni Negri once gave an interview to Le Monde&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 103</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;As some social analysts and economists have suggested, the contemporary explosion of economic productivity confronts us with the ultimate case of this rule: the coming global economy will tend towards a state in which only 20 percent of the labor force are able to do all the necessary work, so that 80 percent of people will be basically irrelevant and of no use, thus potentially unemployed. As this logic reaches its extreme, would it not be reasonable to bring it to its self-negation: is not a system which renders 80 percent of people irrelevant and useless itself irrelevant and of no use?&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 103</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;This led to sublime “communist” moments, like the one that occurred when French soldiers (sent by Napoleon to suppress the rebellion and restore slavery) approached the black army of (self-)liberated slaves. When they heard an initially indistinct murmur coming from the black crowd, the soldiers at first assumed it must be some kind of tribal war chant; but as they came closer, they realized that the Haitians were singing the Marseillaise, and they started to wonder out loud whether they were not fighting on the wrong side. Events such as these enact universality as a political category. In them, as Buck-Morss put it, “universal humanity is visible at the edges”:&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 112</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Whenever the West is attacked, its first reaction is not aggressive defense but self-probing: what did we do to deserve it? We are ultimately to be blamed for the evils of the world; Third World catastrophes and terrorist violence are merely reactions to our crimes. The positive form of the White Man’s Burden (his responsibility for civilizing the colonized barbarians) is thus merely replaced by its negative form (the burden of the white man’s guilt): if we can no longer be the benevolent masters of the Third World, we can at least be the privileged source of evil, patronizingly depriving others of responsibility for their fate (when a Third World country engages in terrible crimes, it is never fully its own responsibility, but always an after-effect of colonization: they are merely imitating&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 114</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Whenever the West is attacked, its first reaction is not aggressive defense but self-probing: what did we do to deserve it? We are ultimately to be blamed for the evils of the world; Third World catastrophes and terrorist violence are merely reactions to our crimes. The positive form of the White Man’s Burden (his responsibility for civilizing the colonized barbarians) is thus merely replaced by its negative form (the burden of the white man’s guilt): if we can no longer be the benevolent masters of the Third World, we can at least be the privileged source of evil, patronizingly depriving others of responsibility for their fate (when a Third World country engages in terrible crimes, it is never fully its own responsibility, but always an after-effect of colonization: they are merely imitating what their colonial masters used to do, and so on):&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 114</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;One should remember here the programmatic words of Stokely Carmichael (the founder of Black Power): “We have to fight for the right to invent the terms which will allow us to define ourselves and to define our relations to society, and we have to fight that these terms will be accepted. This is the first need of a free people, and this is also the first right refused by every oppressor.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 120</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Here the series is terminated, simply because the enemy has now taken over the revolutionizing dynamic: one can no longer play the game of subverting the Order from the position of its “part of no-part,” since the Order already now entails its own permanent subversion. With the full deployment of capitalism, it is “normal” life itself which, in a certain manner, is “carnivalized,” with its constant reversals, crises, and reinventions, and it is the critique of capitalism, from a “stable” ethical position, which today more than ever appears as an exception.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 128</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;In Public Opinion (1922), he wrote that a “governing class” must rise to face the challenge—he saw the public as Plato did, as a great beast or a bewildered herd, floundering in the “chaos of local opinions.”39 So the herd of citizens must be governed by “a specialized class whose interests reach beyond the locality”—this elite class is to act as a machinery of knowledge that circumvents the primary defect of democracy, the impossible ideal of the “omni-competent citizen.” This is indeed how our democracies function—and with our consent. There is no mystery in what Lippmann was saying, it is an obvious fact; the mystery is that, knowing this, we continue to play the game. We act as if we are free to choose, while silently not only accepting but even demanding that an invisible injunction (inscribed in the very form of our commitment to “free speech”) tells us what to do and to think. As Marx noted long ago, the secret is in the form itself.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 134</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;When “immaterial work” (education, therapy, etc.) is celebrated as the kind of work which directly produces social relations, one should not forget what this means within a commodity economy: namely, that new domains, hitherto excluded from the market, are now commodified. When in trouble, we no longer talk to a friend but pay a psychiatrist or counselor to take care of the problem; children are increasingly cared for not by parents but by paid nurseries or child-minders, and so on. We are thus in the midst of a new process of the privatization of the social, of establishing new enclosures.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 144</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;I have referred elsewhere to Jean-Pierre Dupuy’s claim that, if we are to confront adequately the threat of (social or environmental) catastrophe, we need to break out of this “historical” notion of temporality: we have to introduce a new notion of time. Dupuy calls this time the “time of a project,” of a closed circuit between the past and the future: the future is causally produced by our acts in the past, while the way we act is determined by our anticipation of the future and our reaction to this anticipation:&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 150</div></div>      </div>
      </div>
        <div class="footer">
    <div class="footer-data"><div class="footer-links"><ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/contact.php" title="">Contact</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/support.php" title="">Support</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/privacy.php" title="">Privacy</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/rights.php" title="">Rights</a></li></ul></div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="copyright">Copyright (c) 1999-2026 earthli.com. All Rights Reserved.</div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="versions">Powered by <ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore/app_news.php">earthli News 3.7</a></li><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore" title="">earthli WebCore&trade; 3.7</a></li></ul></div></div>    </div>
      </div>
  </div>  </body>
</html>
]]>
  </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
      <title type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[Requiem for a Dream: A Novel by Hubert Selby Jr. (read in 2015)]]>
  </title>
    <id>https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3180</id>
    <link href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3180"/>
    <updated>2016-04-18T07:21:36+02:00</updated>
    <author>
        <name type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[Marco von Ballmoos]]>
  </name>
      <uri>https://earthli.com/users/marco</uri>
    </author>
      <summary type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<blockquote class="quote abstract "><div>Disclaimer: these are notes I took while reading this book. They include citations I found interesting or enlightening or particularly well-written. In some cases, I&rsquo;ve pointed out which of these applies to which citation; in others, I have not. Any benefit you gain from reading these notes is... [<a class="complete-text-link" href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3180">More</a>]</div></blockquote>]]>
  </summary>
      <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<html lang="en">
  <head>
    <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/themes/ice.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/fonts/raleway.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/core/medium.css">
  </head>
  <body>
<div class="style-controls">  <div class="page">
    <div class="page-body">
<div class="info-box-top">
<p>
Published by <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_user.php?name=marco" title="Marco von Ballmoos" class="visible">marco</a> on <span class="date-time">18. Apr 2016 07:21:36 (GMT-5)</span>
</p>
</div>
      <div class="text-flow wide">
  <blockquote class="quote abstract "><div>Disclaimer: these are notes I took while reading this book. They include citations I found interesting or enlightening or particularly well-written. In some cases, I&rsquo;ve pointed out which of these applies to which citation; in others, I have not. Any benefit you gain from reading these notes is purely incidental to the purpose they serve of reminding me what I once read. Please see Wikipedia for a summary if I&rsquo;ve failed to provide one sufficient for your purposes. If my notes serve to trigger an interest in this book, then I&rsquo;m happy for you.</div></blockquote><p>I&rsquo;d already seen the movie and it was relatively faithful to the source material. The book is written in a rambling, near–stream-of-consciousness street patois with little punctuation and structure. The grammar is mostly OK, so you can get used to it, but it&rsquo;s a bit of a challenge at first. Not as much so as the middle chapter in <em>Cloud Atlas</em> but it might still be off-putting for some.</p>
<p>tl;dr: Drugs are bad.</p>
<p>More precisely, addiction is bad. This film is the story of a mother, her son, his girlfriend and their best friend. Nice, huh?</p>
<p>Spoiler alert: the book ends with the mother strapped to a bed in a mental hospital, withdrawing from a severe amphetamine addiction, the son lies in a hospital, his left arm amputated because of a festering needle wound, the best friend is on a work gang in prison, suffering beatings and malnutrition and the girlfriend is curled up on her couch at home, cuddling her scag, earned by performing in a private sex show for her new pimp.</p>
<p>The mother never quite recovered from the death of her husband and the son isn’t around enough to take care of her. She spends her days watching a self-help guru’s infomercial. She gets an invitation to the show but can’t fit into her dress. She resolves to lose weight by the time she gets her actual invitation. After a day spent trying it the old-fashioned way, she makes an appointment with a diet doctor and starts her downward spiral.</p>
<p>The son and his friends are already well on their way, shucking and jiving for enough money to buy a stash for the night. They resolve to follow the junkie dream: they pool their cash and start selling instead of just using everything they have. This actually works OK for a while, but the friend is busted by the cops on a deal and the money they’ve saved is used for bail and nearly gone in one fell swoop. The son and his girlfriend predictably fight over the lack of drugs and he heads out with his friend to Florida to make a big score. She can’t wait that long and calls a dealer who wants women rather than money in exchange for drugs.</p>
<h2>Citations</h2><p>I like &ldquo;smiled loudly&rdquo; as well as &ldquo;leaned into the words&rdquo;.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;She giggled and squirmed and soon they both tired and just leaned against the wall, smiling loudly.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 21</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Everyones eyes were half closed from the smoke and dope, and their faces kept twisting and grinning as they leaned into the words.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 23</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Sometimes. Sometimes it seems to stand still. Like youre in a bag and you cant get out and somebodys always telling you that it will get better with time and time just seems to stand still and laugh at you and your pain. … And then eventually it does break and its six months later. Like you just got your summer clothes out and then its Christmas and inbetween there are ten years of pain.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 37</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;O man, ah dont even want to talk about work right now, not that ah ever am too hip on it, but right now ah just wants to think of Tyrone C. Love an how goooooood he feel.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 61</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;She went back to that restaurant on the hill in Naples and sat there for endless hours for a week, looking at Vesuvius, Capri, the bay, the sky, trying, with the desperation of the dying, to reawaken those old feelings, trying with jewels of sparkling wine to rekindle the flame that half fired her imagination just a short lifetime ago, and though the wine sparkled in the sunlight, and the moonlight, the once blazing fire was extinguished and Marion finally succumbed to the stone coldness within her.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 89</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;We would be watching the news and be seeing the cops beating people over the head with their clubs and my mother and father would claim it wasnt really happening or they were some sort of hippie degenerate commies. Thats the big thing with them. Everybodys a commie. Talk about freedom and human rights and youre a commie. All they want to talk about is the sacred right of the stockholder and how the police protect our property. … She took a deep breath, closed her eyes for a moment, then looked at Harry, You know, if I were to tell them about this theyd say it didnt happen, that I just made it up. She shook her head, It just amazes me how blind some people can be to the truth. Its right there in front of them and they dont see&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 179</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;And the streets were getting tougher. All the neighborhood streets were filled with dope fiends, even in the snow and sleet, looking for something, anything. Every hallway was cluttered with sick faces with runny noses and bodies shivering with the cold and junk sickness, the cold cracking the marrow of their bones as they broke out in sweats from time to time.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 189</div></div><p>This is really relentlessly pessimistic.; Did Nancy Reagan have a hand in writing this?</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Whatever chances they had to take they took automatically as their disease ordered and they obeyed, a small part of them wanting to try to resist, but that part shoved so far down that it was no more than an ancient dream from a previous life. Only the insatiable and insane need of the moment had any bearing on their lives, and it was that need that gave the orders.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 192</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Around the hole in Harrys arm a huge greenish white lump had formed with red streaks spreading out toward his shoulder and wrist. I can hardly move the son of a bitch. Im gonta have ta do somethin man.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 259</div></div><p>Harry loses an arm. Marion becomes a super gang-bangin&rsquo; ho. It&rsquo;s a cautionary tale. Drugs are bad. Bit this is getting a bit heavy-handed.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;She tried to smile and her face started to stretch in her wide-eyed grin as little bits of spittle dribbled down her chin. He signed his name to a piece of paper and handed it back to the man. She was committed to a State Mental Hospital.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 263</div></div><p>Drugs are bad? TV is bad? The man is bad? America is bad?</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;A couple of drunks fought over the toilet, one hanging his head in the bowl, puking, the other one puking all over him, the both of them eventually passing out and lying in their own and each others puke.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 269</div></div><p>Really? If Selby didn&rsquo;t have so much drug experience under his belt, I would accuse him of deliberately making this scene more gory in order to scare kids straight. </p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;this guy told him if he would plead guilty to vagrancy that he would only have to serve a few weeks on the work gang. When you get out theyll give you a bus ticket back to New York. Where our money? Did you have any? Tyrone looked at him for a moment, blinking his eyes, trying to see him clearly, We had over a thousan dollars jim. Not according to this report. Tyrone stared for another moment then inwardly shrugged.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 270</div></div>      </div>
      </div>
        <div class="footer">
    <div class="footer-data"><div class="footer-links"><ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/contact.php" title="">Contact</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/support.php" title="">Support</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/privacy.php" title="">Privacy</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/rights.php" title="">Rights</a></li></ul></div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="copyright">Copyright (c) 1999-2026 earthli.com. All Rights Reserved.</div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="versions">Powered by <ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore/app_news.php">earthli News 3.7</a></li><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore" title="">earthli WebCore&trade; 3.7</a></li></ul></div></div>    </div>
      </div>
  </div>  </body>
</html>
]]>
  </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
      <title type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[Hard to be a God by Arkady and Boris Strugatsky (read in 2016)]]>
  </title>
    <id>https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3226</id>
    <link href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3226"/>
    <updated>2016-04-17T23:25:58+02:00</updated>
    <author>
        <name type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[Marco von Ballmoos]]>
  </name>
      <uri>https://earthli.com/users/marco</uri>
    </author>
      <summary type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<blockquote class="quote abstract "><div>Disclaimer: these are notes I took while reading this book. They include citations I found interesting or enlightening or particularly well-written. In some cases, I&rsquo;ve pointed out which of these applies to which citation; in others, I have not. Any benefit you gain from reading these notes is... [<a class="complete-text-link" href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3226">More</a>]</div></blockquote>]]>
  </summary>
      <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<html lang="en">
  <head>
    <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/themes/ice.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/fonts/raleway.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/core/medium.css">
  </head>
  <body>
<div class="style-controls">  <div class="page">
    <div class="page-body">
<div class="info-box-top">
<p>
Published by <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_user.php?name=marco" title="Marco von Ballmoos" class="visible">marco</a> on <span class="date-time">17. Apr 2016 23:25:58 (GMT-5)</span>
</p>
</div>
      <div class="text-flow wide">
  <blockquote class="quote abstract "><div>Disclaimer: these are notes I took while reading this book. They include citations I found interesting or enlightening or particularly well-written. In some cases, I&rsquo;ve pointed out which of these applies to which citation; in others, I have not. Any benefit you gain from reading these notes is purely incidental to the purpose they serve of reminding me what I once read. Please see Wikipedia for a summary if I&rsquo;ve failed to provide one sufficient for your purposes. If my notes serve to trigger an interest in this book, then I&rsquo;m happy for you.</div></blockquote><p>Since the movie followed the book so faithfully, I&rsquo;ll just include some of the text from my movie review.</p>
<p>The story is of an Earth-like planet on which a similar evolutionary track was followed by a very human-like race, but they never experienced a Renaissance. Their buildings are of poor quality, their sanitation is a horror and their hygiene is non-existent. The filth is omnipresent. You can almost smell this movie. It’s incredible how absolutely everything is covered with mud, food remnants and shit. The fog and rain soak everything. Everything is of primitive construction, people shit and piss and blow their pus-running noses everywhere. They spit, they taste things, they scratch, they pick and they flick.</p>
<p>Slaves have boards around their necks—almost everyone we see is a slave of some kind. People have eyes missing. Instead of a Renaissance, a Khmer Rouge-style revolution has occurred: all books and learning and instruments and advancement have been destroyed and their purveyors and inventors put to death. One form of execution we see is upending in a latrine.</p>
<p>We follow the story of Don Rumata, an Earthman sent ostensibly to study these people but who has taken up as a God among them. We follow him from his “palace”, interacting with the various psychotic locals, to a local market (?) where he meets up with a group of other Earthlings. It is not hard to imagine that the people find him to be a God—he is so much cleaner than the others, with metal greaves and vambraces pretty much the only thing they see of him.</p>
<p>Everything’s in a terrible state of disrepair and we see the only minds allowed to work involved in building new torture devices. The “bookworms” have all been hanged and left to rot on a gallows. The dialogue is also scattered, nonsensical, but enough sense can be distilled to follow a story. Everyone is near-mad, the actions unexplainable, the destruction they wreak on their environs chaotic. Random, wanton, childish. An unenlightened world of fools. It’s impossible to imagine how such a society survives, how it feeds itself, how it staves off disease. Every scene reflects their actions, implements and armor and chains and animals and fowl and bells pinned and tied and roped and chained everywhere, covered in filth and dripping water.</p>
<p>The Strugatsky brothers certainly delivered a tour de force in this novel, a novel of science-fictional despair rather than triumph. Please see the <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3212">full movie review</a> for more detail.</p>
<h2>Citations</h2><p>This is from a conversation Rumata had with a colleague who&rsquo;s been there much longer than Rumata. He tells of being an anthropologist who&rsquo;s lost himself in the world he&rsquo;s studying.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;All that was said about us. I’ve been here for fifteen years. My dear boy, I’ve even stopped having dreams about Earth. One day, rummaging through my papers, I found a picture of a woman and for a long time couldn’t figure out who she was. I occasionally realize with terror that I’ve long stopped being an employee of the Institute, that I’m now an exhibit in the Institute’s museum, the chief justice of a feudal mercantile republic, and that there’s a room in the museum in which I belong. That’s the worst thing—to lose yourself in the role. Inside each one of us, the noble bastard struggles with the communard. And everything around us helps the bastard, while the communard is all alone—the Earth is thousands and thousands of parsecs away.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 39</div></div><p>Rumata fears what will happen when tyranny rises over a people who are not yet ready to rise.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The dragon does have a heart. And we know where it is. And that’s the most frightening thing, my quiet, helpless friend. We know where it is, but we can’t destroy it without spilling the blood of thousands of frightened, hypnotized, blind people who know no doubts. And there are so many of them, hopelessly many—ignorant, isolated, embittered by perpetual thankless labor, downtrodden, not yet able to rise above the thought of an extra penny. And they cannot yet be taught, united, guided, saved from themselves. Far too early, centuries earlier than it should have, the gray muck has risen in Arkanar. It won’t meet with resistance, and all that’s left is to save those few there is still time to save.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 76</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Yes, they were right at the Institute. Then the inevitable. Bloody chaos in the country. The surfacing of Waga’s night army, ten thousand thugs excommunicated by every church—rapists, murderers, and sadists; hordes of copper-skinned barbarians descending from the mountains and destroying everything that moves, from newborns to the aged; huge crowds of peasants and townspeople, blind with terror, fleeing to the forests, mountains, and deserts; and your supporters—merry men, brave men!—ripping open each other’s bellies in a brutal struggle for power and for the right to control the machine gun after your inevitable violent death. And this absurd death—from a cup of wine served by your best friend, or from a crossbow bolt whistling toward your back from behind a curtain. And the horrified face of the one who will be sent from Earth to replace you, and who will find a country depopulated, drenched in blood, still burning, in which everything, everything, everything will need to be started over again.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 77</div></div><p>He faces the same struggle as all intelligent men, when faced with the rapacity of a lower culture, of a world filled with low men, interested only in short-term and very personal gain, without regard for principles or basic ethics. In such a world, any improvement you make is at best ephemeral, creating a vacuum into which something almost certainly worse will flood. This is not to argue for inaction, even the pyrrhic kind, but a warning against overestimating their predictability. If everything must be terrible, but in different ways, then why not roll the dice?</p>
<p>More musing on futility by Don Rumata:</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;It’s hopeless, he thought. There’s no force strong enough to drag them out of their usual range of cares and ideas. You could give them everything. You could put them in the most modern spectroacoustic housing and teach them ionic procedures, and they’d still gather in the kitchen in the evening, playing cards and cackling about the neighbor whose wife wallops him. And there isn’t a better way for them to spend their time. In that sense, Don Condor is right: Reba is nothing, a tiny speck in comparison with the enormous influence of traditions, the rules of the herd—sanctified by centuries, unshakeable, tested, accessible to the dullest of the dull, freeing one from the necessity of thinking and wondering. And Don Reba probably wouldn’t even make it into a school curriculum.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 85</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Don Reba can’t be stupid enough to hope to force Budach to work for him. Or maybe he really is stupid. Maybe Don Reba is nothing more than a stupid, lucky schemer who doesn’t know what he wants himself, slyly making a fool of himself for all to see. It’s funny, I’ve been watching him for three years, and I still don’t understand what he is. Although if he’d been watching me, he wouldn’t understand either.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 87</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Nothing can help me now, he thought in horror. Because I sincerely hate and despise them. Not pity them, no—only hate and despise. I can justify the stupidity and brutality of the kid I just passed all I want— the social conditions, the appalling upbringing, anything at all—but I now clearly see that he’s my enemy, the enemy of all that I love, the enemy of my friends, the enemy of what I hold most sacred.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 127</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;And there’s nothing that he wants to know, and there’s nothing he wants to think about.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 127</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;He came here to love people, to help them unbend, see the sky. No, I’m a bad operative, he thought remorsefully. I’m a no-good historian. When exactly did I manage to fall into the swamp that Don Condor was talking about? Does a god have the right to feel anything other than pity?&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 127</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;It was probably the fact that almost without exception, they were not yet humans in the modern sense of the world, but blanks, unfinished pieces, which only the bloody centuries of history could one day fashion into true men, proud and free. They were passive, greedy, and incredibly, fantastically selfish. Almost all of them had the psychology of slaves—slaves of religions, slaves of their own kind, slaves of their pathetic passions, slaves of avarice. And if the fates decreed for one of them to be born or become a master, he didn’t know what to do with his freedom. He would again hurry to become a slave—a slave of wealth, a slave of outlandish excesses, a slave of his slaves. The vast majority of them weren’t guilty of anything. They were too passive and too ignorant. Their slavery was the result of passivity and ignorance, and passivity and ignorance again and again breeds slavery.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 145</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;But they were still people, the bearers of the spark of reason. And here and there in their midst, the fires of the incredibly distant and inevitable future would kindle and blaze up. They would kindle despite it all. Despite all their seeming unworthiness. Despite the oppression. Despite the fact that they were being trampled with boots. Despite the fact that no one in the world needed them, and that everyone in the world was against them. Despite the fact that at best, they could expect contemptuous, puzzled pity. They didn’t know that the future was on their side, that the future was impossible without them. They didn’t know that in a world belonging to the terrible ghosts of the past, they were the only manifestation of the future—that they were an enzyme, a vitamin in society’s organism.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 145</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The hell he’ll think of anything. It’s too early for him to think. And it seems so simple: ten thousand hammerers like that, in a rage, could crush anyone to a pulp. Except rage is what they don’t have yet. Only fear. Everyone for himself, only God for all.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 185</div></div><p>The next several citations exhibit the Strugatsky brothers&rsquo; subversiveness against uncaring and unfeeling bureaucracy.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;“No one has any privileges before the Order,” the official said in the same colorless voice. Don Keu huffed, turning livid, but took the hat off. The official ran a long yellow nail along the list. “Don Keu … Don Keu …” he muttered, “Don Keu … Royal Street, Building Twelve?” “Yes,” Don Keu said in an irritated bass voice. “Number four hundred eighty-five, Brother Tibak.” The heavyset Brother Tibak, who was sitting at the adjacent table, crimson from the stuffy air, searched through the papers, wiped the sweat off his bald head, stood up, and read out monotonously, “Number four hundred eighty-five, Don Keu. Royal, Twelve, for the defamation of the name of His Grace the Bishop of Arkanar Don Reba, which took place at the palace ball the year before last, shall receive three dozen lashes on his bared buttocks, and shall kiss His Grace’s boot.” Brother Tibak sat down. “Down that corridor,” said the official in a colorless voice, “the lashes on the right, the boot on the left. Next.” To Rumata’s&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 189</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;“Don Pifa,” the official said, “take your symbol of purification.” He bent down, pulled an iron bracelet from a chest next to the chair, and handed it to noble Pifa. “Wear it on your left arm, produce it as soon as a soldier from the Order demands it. Next.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 190</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The official immediately pulled this sheet from underneath the lists and handed it to Rumata. “Through the yellow door, up to the second floor, room six, down the hall, go right then left,” he said. “Next.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 191</div></div><p>Next.</p>
<p>The next few citations are how the brothers manage to make it seem like the Earthlings really are Gods, almost outsized and much more powerful than the Arkanarans.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Rumata rushed down two staircases, knocking the monks going the other way off their feet, laid himself a path through the crowd of graduates with his scabbards, and kicked open the door of the chamber, which was warping from the baron’s roars.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 199</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Rumata pulled his sword from its scabbard and struck the paper-covered table at which the official was sitting, cutting it in half.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 199</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;[…] grabbed the chains that held the baron’s feet, and ripped them out of the wall with two jerks.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 199</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The baron knocked the top out with his fist, lifted the barrel, and turned it upside down over himself, throwing his head back. The stream of beer rushed toward his throat with a gurgle.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 200</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;They came out of the chamber. Not a single person dared get in their way—the corridor kept emptying out for twenty paces in front of them.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 200</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Damn it, my friend, don’t you find that they have amazingly low ceilings? My head is all scratched up.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 200</div></div><p>Here, Rumata muses on how cleverly he was outmaneuvered by Reba. He even muses that he should name a new unit of feudal intrigue after him.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The king wouldn’t have even taken a pickle from his minister’s hands. So the scoundrel snuck in some charlatan to the king, promising him the title of healer for curing the king. And I understand why Reba was so thrilled when I exposed him in the king’s bedchamber: it’s hard to think of a more convenient way to sneak in the false Budach to the king. All the responsibility fell on Rumata of Estor, the Irukanian spy and conspirator. We’re babes in arms, he thought. The Institute should introduce a course dealing specifically with feudal intrigue. And proficiency should be measured in rebas. Better yet, in decirebas. Although even that’s too much.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 204</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The struggle against evil! But what is evil? Everyone is free to understand this in his own way. For us scholars, evil is in ignorance, but the church teaches that ignorance is a blessing and that all evil comes from knowledge. For the plowman evil is taxes and drought, and for the bread-seller droughts are good. For a slave, evil is a drunk and cruel master; for a craftsman, a greedy moneylender. So what is this evil against which we must struggle, Don Rumata?” He looked sadly at his listeners. “Evil is ineradicable. No man is able to decrease its quantity in the world. He can improve his own fate somewhat, but it is always at the expense of the fate of others. And there will always be kings, some more cruel and some less, and barons, some more violent and some less, and there will always be the ignorant masses, who admire their oppressors and loathe their liberators. And it’s all because a slave has a much better understanding of his master, however brutal, than his liberator, for each slave can easily imagine himself in his master’s place, but few can imagine themselves in the place of a selfless liberator. That’s how people are, Don Rumata, and that’s how our world is.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 206</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;There’s much I don’t like in the world, much I would like to be different. But what can one do? Perfection looks different in the eyes of a higher power than in mine. There is no sense in a tree lamenting that it cannot move, though it would probably be glad to flee from the lumberjack’s ax.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 207</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Budach, crinkling his brow, pondered silently. Rumata waited. The melancholy sound of creaking wagons sounded outside the window again. Budach said quietly, “Then, Lord, wipe us off the face of the planet and create us anew in a more perfect form … Or, even better, leave us be and let us go our own way.” “My heart is full of pity,” Rumata said slowly. “I cannot do that.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 209</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;“Sometimes I think,” said Arata, “that we’re all powerless. I’m the eternal rebel leader, and I know that my power comes from my extraordinary survivability. But this power doesn’t change my powerlessness. My victories magically turn into defeats. My friends in battle turn to enemies—the most courageous ones flee, the most loyal ones turn traitor or die. And I have nothing but my bare hands, and I can’t reach the gilded idols behind fortified walls with my bare hands.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 214</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Arata was clearly somehow superior to him— and not only to him but to all those who had come to this planet uninvited and who, full of helpless pity, watched the tumultuous bustling of its life from the rarefied heights of dry hypotheses and alien morality. And for the first time Rumata thought, There is no gain without a loss. We’re infinitely stronger than Arata in our kingdom of good and infinitely weaker than Arata in his kingdom of evil.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 217</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;You still don’t know everything, thought Rumata. You still believe that you are the only one doomed to be defeated. You still don’t know how hopeless your cause itself is. You still don’t know that the enemy isn’t so much outside your soldiers as within them. You might still overthrow the Order—the wave of peasant rebellion will throw you onto the throne of Arkanar, you will level the castles of the noblemen, you’ll drown the barons in the Strait, and the insurgents will honor you as the great liberator. And you will be kind and wise—the only kind and wise person in your kingdom. And along the way, you will begin to give away land to your associates, and what will your associates do with land without serfs? And the wheel will start spinning the other direction. And you’ll be lucky if you manage to pass away before the new counts and barons emerge out of yesterday’s loyal fighters. That has already happened, my worthy Arata, both on Earth and on this planet.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 217</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;(This was precisely the origin of the famous anecdote in which Nikita the Corn Man, staring at a certain ugly image in a frame, yells in a voice not his own, “And what’s this butt with ears?” And is answered with fear and trembling: “That’s a mirror, Nikita Sergeyevich.”)&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 232</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;All mass media without exception immediately descended on abstraction and formalism in art, as if for the last ten years they had been preparing just for this, collecting materials and only waiting for permission to speak about this burning topic.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 232</div></div><p>Eerily and not at all surprisingly similar to how the US media operates.</p>
<p>The following citations are from an eloquent and delightful afterward by Boris Strugatsky.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;It was as if an ancient abscess had burst. Bad blood and pus overflowed from the newspaper pages. All those who during the years of the “thaw” had gone quiet (it seemed to us), who had flattened their ears and only looked around like hunted animals, as if waiting for the inconceivable, impossible, improbable retribution for the past; all these monstrous offspring of Stalinism and Beria-ism, who were up to the elbows in the blood of innocent victims, all these covert and overt informers, ideological operators and moronic do-gooders—they all instantly sprang out of their hiding places; they all turned out to be right on the spot, energetic, agile, able hyenas of the pen, alligators of the typewriter. Go to it!&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 232</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;One could pick any of these versions or all of them at once. But one thing became, as they say, painfully clear. We shouldn’t have illusions. We shouldn’t have hopes for a brighter future. We were being governed by goons and enemies of culture. They will never be with us. They will always be against us. They will never let us say what we believe is right, because what they believe is right is something completely different. And if for us communism is a world of freedom and creativity, for them communism is a society where the people immediately and with pleasure perform all the prescriptions of the party and government.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 232</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;It’s amazing that this novel went through all the hurdles of censorship without any particular difficulties. Either the liberalism of the then-leaders of the Young Guard played a role, or the careful maneuvers of our wonderful editor, Bela Grigorevna Klyueva, or maybe it was actually just that there was a certain retreat after the recent ideological hysteria— our enemies were catching their breath and complacently looking around the newly captured lands and beachheads.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 232</div></div>      </div>
      </div>
        <div class="footer">
    <div class="footer-data"><div class="footer-links"><ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/contact.php" title="">Contact</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/support.php" title="">Support</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/privacy.php" title="">Privacy</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/rights.php" title="">Rights</a></li></ul></div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="copyright">Copyright (c) 1999-2026 earthli.com. All Rights Reserved.</div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="versions">Powered by <ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore/app_news.php">earthli News 3.7</a></li><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore" title="">earthli WebCore&trade; 3.7</a></li></ul></div></div>    </div>
      </div>
  </div>  </body>
</html>
]]>
  </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
      <title type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[How to Live Safely in a Science Fictional Universe by Charles Yu (read in 2015)]]>
  </title>
    <id>https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3177</id>
    <link href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3177"/>
    <updated>2016-04-17T23:04:23+02:00</updated>
    <author>
        <name type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[Marco von Ballmoos]]>
  </name>
      <uri>https://earthli.com/users/marco</uri>
    </author>
      <summary type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<blockquote class="quote abstract "><div>Disclaimer: these are notes I took while reading this book. They include citations I found interesting or enlightening or particularly well-written. In some cases, I&rsquo;ve pointed out which of these applies to which citation; in others, I have not. Any benefit you gain from reading these notes is... [<a class="complete-text-link" href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3177">More</a>]</div></blockquote>]]>
  </summary>
      <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<html lang="en">
  <head>
    <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/themes/ice.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/fonts/raleway.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/core/medium.css">
  </head>
  <body>
<div class="style-controls">  <div class="page">
    <div class="page-body">
<div class="info-box-top">
<p>
Published by <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_user.php?name=marco" title="Marco von Ballmoos" class="visible">marco</a> on <span class="date-time">17. Apr 2016 23:04:23 (GMT-5)</span>
</p>
<p>
Updated by <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_user.php?name=marco" title="Marco von Ballmoos" class="visible">marco</a> on <span class="date-time">18. Apr 2016 06:57:28 (GMT-5)</span>
</p>
</div>
      <div class="text-flow wide">
  <blockquote class="quote abstract "><div>Disclaimer: these are notes I took while reading this book. They include citations I found interesting or enlightening or particularly well-written. In some cases, I&rsquo;ve pointed out which of these applies to which citation; in others, I have not. Any benefit you gain from reading these notes is purely incidental to the purpose they serve of reminding me what I once read. Please see Wikipedia for a summary if I&rsquo;ve failed to provide one sufficient for your purposes. If my notes serve to trigger an interest in this book, then I&rsquo;m happy for you.</div></blockquote><p>Charles Yu digs through baggage from his past in the guise of a real-life time-machine mechanic. The universe in which he lives is kind of a mix of our own plus all sorts of fictive universes. So, for example, Luke Skywalker is a character because, well, he&rsquo;s part of a popular science-fiction world. The novel addresses all sorts of interesting paradoxes, including loops and writing paradoxical warnings to oneself. He harks back to how his father invented the time machine, but failed to profit from it, instead trapping himself in a diorama/time-loop. It was a meandering, interesting and unique book that seemed to have a lot to do with Charles Yu personally, though that was perhaps just the auto-biographical feel.</p>
<h2>Citations</h2><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;I’ve never been married. I never got married. The woman I didn’t marry is named Marie. Technically, she doesn’t exist. Just like Ed. Except that she does. A little paradox, you might think, but really, The Woman I Never Married is a perfectly valid ontological entity. Or class of entities. I suppose technically you could make the argument that every woman is The Woman I Never Married. So why not call her Marie, that was my thinking.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 7</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;In order to qualify as a protagonist, a human must be able to demonstrate an attachment coefficient of at least 0.75. A coefficient of 1.00 or above is required in order to be a hero. Factors used in calculating the coefficient include ability to believe fervency of that belief humility willingness to look stupid willingness to have heart broken willingness to see U31 as nonboring or, better yet, to see it as interesting, and maybe even important, and despite its deeply defective nature possibly even worth saving Any inhabitant with a negative attachment coefficient (in which case it is referred to as a coefficient of ironic detachment) will be placed on probation pending review of the individual’s suitability for continued inclusion within the U31 diegetic space.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 31</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;If you’re not careful, time will take away everything that ever hurt you, everything you have ever lost, and replace it with knowledge. Time is a machine: it will convert your pain into experience. Raw data will be compiled, will be translated into a more comprehensible language. The individual events of your life will be transmuted into another substance called memory and in the mechanism something will be lost and you will never be able to reverse it, you will never again have the original moment back in its uncategorized, preprocessed state. It will force you to move on and you will not have a choice in the matter.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 54</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Although technically SF, the look and feel of the world in these borderline neighborhoods is less thoroughly executed than elsewhere in the region, and outcomes of story lines can be more randomized, due to a comparatively weaker buffer from the effects of 31’s incomplete physics. As a result, the overall quality of experience for the residents of these striving areas is thinner, poorer, and less substantial than of those in the middle and upper regions, while at the same time, due to its mixed and random and unthemed nature, less satisfying than that of reality, which, although gritty, is, at least, internally consistent.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 78</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;For food-gathering purposes, for outrunning the saber-toothed tiger, for jumping across jagged rocks in a rushing river, to care for our crying infant, we need to focus, we need to know what is going on now. That is to say, our physical ability to understand time has been honed by evolutionary pressures to select for traits useful for survival, in all aspects, and time perception is no exception or special case or even magical or mysterious case.” My father looks at me and smiles when he says this next part. “Which is where I started to have hope. If there is no absolute logical reason why we could not experience the past just like we experience the present, perhaps we can untrain, or perhaps retrain, ourselves to have such a capacity.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 178</div></div>      </div>
      </div>
        <div class="footer">
    <div class="footer-data"><div class="footer-links"><ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/contact.php" title="">Contact</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/support.php" title="">Support</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/privacy.php" title="">Privacy</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/rights.php" title="">Rights</a></li></ul></div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="copyright">Copyright (c) 1999-2026 earthli.com. All Rights Reserved.</div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="versions">Powered by <ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore/app_news.php">earthli News 3.7</a></li><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore" title="">earthli WebCore&trade; 3.7</a></li></ul></div></div>    </div>
      </div>
  </div>  </body>
</html>
]]>
  </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
      <title type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[Perdido Street Station (New Crobuzon Book 1) by China Miéville (read in 2015)]]>
  </title>
    <id>https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3159</id>
    <link href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3159"/>
    <updated>2016-04-17T22:57:20+02:00</updated>
    <author>
        <name type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[Marco von Ballmoos]]>
  </name>
      <uri>https://earthli.com/users/marco</uri>
    </author>
      <summary type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<blockquote class="quote abstract "><div>Disclaimer: these are notes I took while reading this book. They include citations I found interesting or enlightening or particularly well-written. In some cases, I&rsquo;ve pointed out which of these applies to which citation; in others, I have not. Any benefit you gain from reading these notes is... [<a class="complete-text-link" href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3159">More</a>]</div></blockquote>]]>
  </summary>
      <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<html lang="en">
  <head>
    <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/themes/ice.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/fonts/raleway.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/core/medium.css">
  </head>
  <body>
<div class="style-controls">  <div class="page">
    <div class="page-body">
<div class="info-box-top">
<p>
Published by <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_user.php?name=marco" title="Marco von Ballmoos" class="visible">marco</a> on <span class="date-time">17. Apr 2016 22:57:20 (GMT-5)</span>
</p>
<p>
Updated by <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_user.php?name=marco" title="Marco von Ballmoos" class="visible">marco</a> on <span class="date-time">17. Apr 2016 22:57:30 (GMT-5)</span>
</p>
</div>
      <div class="text-flow wide">
  <blockquote class="quote abstract "><div>Disclaimer: these are notes I took while reading this book. They include citations I found interesting or enlightening or particularly well-written. In some cases, I&rsquo;ve pointed out which of these applies to which citation; in others, I have not. Any benefit you gain from reading these notes is purely incidental to the purpose they serve of reminding me what I once read. Please see Wikipedia for a summary if I&rsquo;ve failed to provide one sufficient for your purposes. If my notes serve to trigger an interest in this book, then I&rsquo;m happy for you.</div></blockquote><p><br>
This is the story of Isaac, a thaumaturge/scientist in New Crobuzon, a city described in incredible and sprawling detail by Miéville. He lives with girlfriend Lin, who&rsquo;s an artist. She creates sculptures using special materials that she chews with her mandibles behind her head. You guessed it, she&rsquo;s not human. She&rsquo;s kind of a combination fly/super-sexy woman. You&rsquo;re not allowed to talk about her like that, but that&rsquo;s the most succinct description. </p>
<p>There&rsquo;s also Yagharek, an outcast member of a strict flying species, who commissions Issac to help him fly again—his wings having been ripped from him by the expulsion ceremony. In his investigations, Issac discovers an iridescent caterpillar that turns into one of the most evil, multi-dimensional beings known to Crobuzon. He feeds it dreamshit, a drug made from the shit of the caterpillar&rsquo;s captive full-grown compatriots. This is a bad move. The creature escapes and frees its comrades.</p>
<p>They all begin to prey on the populace of Crobuzon, sucking souls and psyches and just basically bringing the whole mood down. The creatures were deliberately kept by the military of New Crobuzon as a military weapon that is now out of control. Isaac discovers so-called &ldquo;crisis energy&rdquo;, which is kind of analogous to harnessing the power of quantum foam, I guess.</p>
<p>There&rsquo;s also an extra-dimensional spider called Weaver as well as a secretive Council that machinates throughout the city. The book was more intricate than that, but it was also about 800 pages long. Well-written but a bit over-detailed in places.</p>
<h2>Citations</h2><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Guilt passed visibly over his face at his one-sided conversation, but Isaac could not help himself. He was utterly in the throes of a new project. Lin felt a familiar melancholy affection for him. Melancholy at his self-sufficiency in these moments of fascination; affection for his fervour and passion.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 1318-1320</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;“The point is, Yag, that what you’ve got there is water behaving very much as it shouldn’t. Right? And that’s what you want. You want heavy stuff, this thing here, this body—” he poked Yagharek gently in the chest “—to fly. Are you with me? Let’s turn our minds to the ontological conundrum of persuading matter to break habits of aeons. We want to make elements misbehave. This isn’t a problem of advanced ornithology, it’s philosophy.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 2834-2837</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Lin’s broodma (who scorned a name as a decadent affectation) taught Lin and her broodsister that Insect Aspect was the lord of all creation, the all-powerful force that knew only hunger and thirst and rutting and satisfaction. He had shat out the universe after eating the void, in a mindless act of cosmic creation the purer and more brilliant for being devoid of motive or awareness. Lin and her broodsister were taught to worship Him with a terrified fervour, and to despise their self-awareness and their soft, chitinless bodies.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 3625-3629</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The thing drew on the stored energy it had drawn from the dreamshit and powered its transformation. It self-organized. Its mutating form bubbled and welled up into strange dimensional rifts, oozing like oily sludge over the brim of the world into other planes and back again. It folded in on itself, shaping itself out of the protean sludge of its own base matter.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 4144-4146</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Infinitesimal jolts of energy burst through tiny, finely engineered steamhammers. In the centre of the brain was a box crammed with rank upon rank of minuscule on-off switches that puttered up and down at great and increasing speed. Each switch was a steam-powered synapse, pushing buttons and pulling levers in intensely complicated combinations.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 4095-4097</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The thing unfolded. The sense was of a blossoming. An expansion after being enclosed, like a man or woman standing and spreading their arms wide after huddling foetally, but multiplied and made vast. As if the thing’s indistinct limbs could bend a thousand times, so that it unhinged like a paper sculpture, standing and spreading arms or legs or tentacles or tails that opened and opened.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 4284-4287</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;He could not see its shape. Only its dark, glistening skin and hands that clutched like a child’s. Cold shadows. Eyes that were not eyes. Organic folds and jags and twists like rats’ tails that shuddered and twitched as if newly dead. And those finger-long shards of colourless bone that shone white and parted and dripped and that were teeth . . .&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 4289-4291</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;It was social. When it was born for the second time it was with a hunger for company. Its tongue unrolled and it tasted the gritty air for anything that was like itself. The thing shuddered. Faintly, so faintly, it could sense something in the east. It could taste frustration. Its wings trembled in empathy.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 4357-4360</div></div><p>Reminds me of venom, from the Spider-Man universe.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;There was an enormous window that looked out directly at Perdido Street Station and the Spike, and a variety of speaking tubes, calculating engines and telescopic periscopes stashed in niches around the room, in obscure and oddly threatening poses.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 4542-4543</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;From out of shadows cast by some unseen shapes, shadows that seemed stretched-out and taut, tethered from corner to corner of the square room, something stalked into view. Into existence. It bulked suddenly where there had been nothing. It stepped out from behind some fold in space. It picked its way forward, delicate on pointed feet, vast body bobbing, lifting multiple legs high. It looked down at Rudgutter and his fellows from a head that loomed colossally above them. A spider.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 5541-5545</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The crawling infinity of colours, the chaos of textures that went into each strand of that eternally complex tapestry . . . each one resonated under the step of the dancing mad god, vibrating and sending little echoes of bravery, or hunger, or architecture, or argument, or cabbage or murder or concrete across the æther. The weft of starlings’ motivations connected to the thick, sticky strand of a young thief’s laugh. The fibres stretched taut and glued themselves solidly to a third line, its silk made from the angles of seven flying buttresses to a cathedral roof. The plait disappeared into the enormity of possible spaces. Every intention, interaction, motivation, every colour, every body, every action and reaction, every piece of physical reality and the thoughts that it engendered, every connection made, every nuanced moment of history and potentiality, every toothache and flagstone, every emotion and birth and banknote, every possible thing ever is woven into that limitless, sprawling web. It is without beginning or end. It is complex to a degree that humbles the mind. It is a work of such beauty that my soul wept.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 6778-6786</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;I could not close down my mind. It scrambled, unbidden, to remember what it had seen. But it could not contain it. I was left only with a sense of it all. I remember it now as a description. The weight of its immensity is no longer present in my head.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 6798-6800</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Each successive exudation charged the air to a higher pitch of excitement. The moths bared their gravestone teeth and bleated their sexual challenge to each other.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 8485-8486</div></div><p>Here I get a strong image of Giger&rsquo;s alien.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Pengefinchess’s history is one of selfishness and plunder, yet it is made by the telling into a valedictory for dead comrades. My history of selfishness and exile resists transmutation. It cannot but be a base story of base things. I am silent.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 9628-9630</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Whichever, the Council don’t care about killing off humans or any others, if it’s . . . useful. It’s got no empathy, no morals,” Isaac continued, pushing hard at a resistant piece of metal. “It’s just a . . . a calculating intelligence. Cost and benefit. It’s trying to . . . maximize itself. It’ll do whatever it has to—it’ll lie to us, it’ll kill—to increase its own power.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 10510-10513</div></div>      </div>
      </div>
        <div class="footer">
    <div class="footer-data"><div class="footer-links"><ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/contact.php" title="">Contact</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/support.php" title="">Support</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/privacy.php" title="">Privacy</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/rights.php" title="">Rights</a></li></ul></div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="copyright">Copyright (c) 1999-2026 earthli.com. All Rights Reserved.</div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="versions">Powered by <ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore/app_news.php">earthli News 3.7</a></li><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore" title="">earthli WebCore&trade; 3.7</a></li></ul></div></div>    </div>
      </div>
  </div>  </body>
</html>
]]>
  </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
      <title type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[Rant: The Oral Biography of Buster Casey by Chuck Palahniuk (read in 2015)]]>
  </title>
    <id>https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3156</id>
    <link href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3156"/>
    <updated>2016-03-26T08:13:43+01:00</updated>
    <author>
        <name type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[Marco von Ballmoos]]>
  </name>
      <uri>https://earthli.com/users/marco</uri>
    </author>
      <summary type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<blockquote class="quote abstract "><div>Disclaimer: these are notes I took while reading this book. They include citations I found interesting or enlightening or particularly well-written. In some cases, I&rsquo;ve pointed out which of these applies to which citation; in others, I have not. Any benefit you gain from reading these notes is... [<a class="complete-text-link" href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3156">More</a>]</div></blockquote>]]>
  </summary>
      <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<html lang="en">
  <head>
    <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/themes/ice.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/fonts/raleway.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/core/medium.css">
  </head>
  <body>
<div class="style-controls">  <div class="page">
    <div class="page-body">
<div class="info-box-top">
<p>
Published by <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_user.php?name=marco" title="Marco von Ballmoos" class="visible">marco</a> on <span class="date-time">26. Mar 2016 08:13:43 (GMT-5)</span>
</p>
</div>
      <div class="text-flow wide">
  <blockquote class="quote abstract "><div>Disclaimer: these are notes I took while reading this book. They include citations I found interesting or enlightening or particularly well-written. In some cases, I&rsquo;ve pointed out which of these applies to which citation; in others, I have not. Any benefit you gain from reading these notes is purely incidental to the purpose they serve of reminding me what I once read. Please see Wikipedia for a summary if I&rsquo;ve failed to provide one sufficient for your purposes. If my notes serve to trigger an interest in this book, then I&rsquo;m happy for you.</div></blockquote><p>The story is told through one-line to one-page–long biographical snippets. The story goes from Buster&rsquo;s upbringing in a grindingly poor town, where his young mother teaches him to how to make Easter eggs with wax and boiled vegetable stock. He is an odd child, inuring himself to poison through repeated animal, insect and arachnid bits, collecting old paint cans from old folks, who don&rsquo;t realize they might be full of extremely valuable coins dating back to the mid-1800s, and following the foretellings of an old man who he met once and claimed to be his real father.</p>
<p>He warps the local economy in a way that makes all the townspeople complicit in his scheme, he catches and beats rabies multiple times, all the while spreading it throughout the town, especially the girls who, oddly, can&rsquo;t get enough of him. He takes his ill-gotten gains to the city, where more of the world he inhabits is revealed, in the form of a stark subdivision between night and day shifts for humanity as a way of solving traffic woes, as well as a whole subculture of people organizing crash parties, in which they crash their cars into each other to feel what it&rsquo;s like to really live—something that almost no-one knows now that one can &ldquo;boost peaks&rdquo; from others.</p>
<p>That is, full-bore digital sensory capture is freely available and lulls the populace. And this is very much what it is intended to do, according to some of the later biographical participants—to keep people from discovering that, if you crash your car just right, and you&rsquo;re in just the right theta-wave, meditative state, you will be transported to another place in time, where you can become your own progenitor and increase the power of your current self, until you reach a point where you can kill your own parents, terminate the loop by eliminating the beginning and live forever, suspended in a liminal state. Very much an Infinite-Jest vibe (even a bit of Pynchon at times).</p>
<p>Some wicked cool concepts and intriguing thoughts in this one. Recommended.</p>
<h2>Citations</h2><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Near as I recollect, Chet and Buddy didn’t start out slow eaters. I trained them that way. It got to be too much, baking a devil’s-food cake from scratch and watching Chet and Buddy wolf it down in three bites. Two of them hurrying to choke down one slice, then another, until the cake was nothing left but the dirty plate. Even while they’re inhaling my food, they’re talking plans about something next, or reading out of a catalogue, or hearing the news on the radio. Always living months into the future. Miles down the road.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 91</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Here’s a single girl’s secret—the reason you eat dinner with a man on a first date is so you know how he’s going to fuck you. A slob who gobbles down the meal, never looks at a bite, you know not to crawl into bed with that guy.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 92</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Eight hours every day, renting out copies of Little Becky’s Seaside Hunt for Shells. Everybody wanting the same mass-marketed crap. Saying it’s for their kid, but really it’s not. All these fat, middle-aged dumbshits just want something to kill time. Nothing dark and edgy or challenging. Nothing artsy. Just so long as it’s got a happy ending.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 114</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;My point is, this seventy-two hours is coming out of someone’s life. This boost will replace something real a person might do, so it should be decent. Hell, it ought to be beyond decent. If some asswipe’s handing over his time, he should get the train trip sweetened by having the whole mess rewitnessed through a Playboy Bunny on heroin. Morphine at least. Watch those boring, bullshit mountains roll past while zonked on opiates and fondling your own set of love-a-luscious titties. You want to wish the old man a happy Father’s Day, that would be my gift suggestion.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 118</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Renting out copies of Little Becky’s Easter Egg Hunt to people who just want to get through another awful night, alone. These people, boring themselves to death.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 121</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;From the Field Notes of Green Taylor Simms: Perpetuating Santa Claus and the Easter Bunny breaks ground for further socialization—including conformance to traffic laws which allow the maximum number of drivers to commingle on our roadways. In addition, insisting that the journey is always a means to some greater end, and the excitement and danger of the journey should be minimized. Perpetuating the fallacy that a journey itself is of little value.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 131</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Even the night Rant died, my automatic first thought was: Philip Glass’s Violin Concerto II, or Ravel’s Piano Concerto in G Major…?&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 139</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;None of the engineers impacted with enough velocity to hurt their comrades, and none of the events was worse than paint scratches and sheetmetal body damage. Still, on video you see traffic immediately slow to a voyeuristic crawl. The infamous and bothersome rubberneck effect.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 173</div></div><p>Definite vibes of <em>Infinite Jest</em>.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Rant’s hand slides across the seat until his fingers touch mine. He lifts my hand to his face, his lips touching my knuckles, he sniffs, eyes closed, and says, “Wrong.” He says, “Yesterday, you had rolled-oat granola with maple sugar and pumpkin seeds, vanilla yogurt, and dried cranberries…” And of course he’s dead-on.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 178</div></div><p>There&rsquo;s also more than just a hint of <em>Das Parfum</em>, now that i think about it.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Neddy Nelson: You have any idea how bright the sun looks if you’ve been raised at night? Have you spent a hundred-something-thousand heartbeats wondering if you’re not already dying of rabies? Maybe you haven’t boosted in weeks, because you’re afraid you won’t be able to? You ever see friends you recognize get machine-gunned by police on real-time traffic cams? You ever found yourself trapped in a world where you’re everybody’s worst nightmare?&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 224</div></div><p>His wizardry lies in slowly and with tiny pieces accreting a story, a world, in which these words make sense. They mean something only now in the context of the rest of the book I&rsquo;d already read.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;a curfew officer named Daniel Hammish, age forty-seven, a nineteen-year veteran of curfew patrol, was making his evening sweep when he assaulted a passerby.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 226</div></div><p>That&rsquo;s a rather nice way of adding more context, temporal this time.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;I mean, what if you found yourself a long time ago—by accident—and you met your own great-great-grandmother before it was wrong to date her? And what if she was a babe? And let’s say you two hooked up? And how about she has a baby who’d be both your daughter and your great-grandmother?&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 250</div></div><p>h/t to <em>Up the Line</em> by Robert Silverberg, which developed this concept into a major plot point three decades before this book came out.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;How can you expect Historians to feel anything for the suffering of the rest of us? Do you cry when a flower wilts? When a carton of milk goes sour? Don’t you think they’ve seen so many people die that their sympathy or empathy or whatever is pretty much wore out?&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 268</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The Emergency Health Powers Act simply enables the federal government to suspend all state and local powers, seize property, and quarantine populations in order to effectively deal with any infectious agent.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 299</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Neddy Nelson: Doesn’t it scare you that the Emergency Health Powers Act now preempts all legal rights of the individual? Shot Dunyun: The way you lock up all your enemies without charging them with any crime, or providing lawyers, it’s called a quarantine. Doctors are the new judge and jury. Disease is the new weapon of mass destruction. Neddy Nelson: Why do you think every political radical gets “diagnosed” as rabid, then locked up until his inevitable death is announced? Don’t you see how this is legalized assassination?&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 302</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Wallace Boyer: Nothing says you have to believe this. Nothing says you have to even listen, but consider that plenty of smart, rich, powerful folks in history went to their graves swearing that the sun went around us. Also consider that someday, when you’re dead and rotted, kids with their baby teeth will sit in their time-geography class and laugh about how stupid you were.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 307</div></div><p>Or perhaps that there is only one time, shared by all, instead of individual manipulated loops and whorls. it&rsquo;s like the myth of the common economy now. We don&rsquo;t <em>all</em> share just one. It could turn out to be the same with time, once we make a breakthrough. (Made me think of how the main plot conceit of <em>The Long Earth</em> changed everything we know about &ldquo;being on Earth&rdquo;.)</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;And Green said, “Who do you think invented this little game you enjoy so much?” He said, “Who do you think decides the field and flag and window, then sends the word out?” He said, “What do you suppose would happen to Party Crashing without me?”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 307</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Wallace Boyer: If it helps, consider how people used to think the world was flat. Two-dimensional. They only believed in the part they could see, until somebody invented the ships and somebody brave sailed off to find the rest of the earth. Consider that Rant Casey is the Christopher Columbus of time travel.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 310</div></div>      </div>
      </div>
        <div class="footer">
    <div class="footer-data"><div class="footer-links"><ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/contact.php" title="">Contact</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/support.php" title="">Support</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/privacy.php" title="">Privacy</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/rights.php" title="">Rights</a></li></ul></div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="copyright">Copyright (c) 1999-2026 earthli.com. All Rights Reserved.</div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="versions">Powered by <ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore/app_news.php">earthli News 3.7</a></li><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore" title="">earthli WebCore&trade; 3.7</a></li></ul></div></div>    </div>
      </div>
  </div>  </body>
</html>
]]>
  </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
      <title type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[Mind of My Mind (The Patternist Series, Book 2) by Octavia Butler (read in 2015)]]>
  </title>
    <id>https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3158</id>
    <link href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3158"/>
    <updated>2016-02-28T22:42:05+01:00</updated>
    <author>
        <name type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[Marco von Ballmoos]]>
  </name>
      <uri>https://earthli.com/users/marco</uri>
    </author>
      <summary type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<blockquote class="quote abstract "><div>Disclaimer: these are notes I took while reading this book. They include citations I found interesting or enlightening or particularly well-written. In some cases, I&rsquo;ve pointed out which of these applies to which citation; in others, I have not. Any benefit you gain from reading these notes is... [<a class="complete-text-link" href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3158">More</a>]</div></blockquote>]]>
  </summary>
      <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<html lang="en">
  <head>
    <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/themes/ice.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/fonts/raleway.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/core/medium.css">
  </head>
  <body>
<div class="style-controls">  <div class="page">
    <div class="page-body">
<div class="info-box-top">
<p>
Published by <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_user.php?name=marco" title="Marco von Ballmoos" class="visible">marco</a> on <span class="date-time">28. Feb 2016 22:42:05 (GMT-5)</span>
</p>
</div>
      <div class="text-flow wide">
  <blockquote class="quote abstract "><div>Disclaimer: these are notes I took while reading this book. They include citations I found interesting or enlightening or particularly well-written. In some cases, I&rsquo;ve pointed out which of these applies to which citation; in others, I have not. Any benefit you gain from reading these notes is purely incidental to the purpose they serve of reminding me what I once read. Please see Wikipedia for a summary if I&rsquo;ve failed to provide one sufficient for your purposes. If my notes serve to trigger an interest in this book, then I&rsquo;m happy for you.</div></blockquote><p>This is book two of the Patternist series. The main character of the first part of the book is Doro, a 5000-year–old superbeing with enhanced mental powers. He is at least partially telepathic, though not so against other telepaths. But his primary power is the ability to force his way in to another being&rsquo;s mind, eradicating that mind and replacing it with his own.</p>
<p>Doro is beyond human, superhuman, and views most of humanity as herd animals, for use as he pleases. He started a breeding program many millennia ago with another powerful woman, a shapeshifter and their progeny tend toward superpowers of the psychic kind. When we join them in the 20th century, the most successful of his offspring have herds of slaves tending to their every whim. The only hiccup to domination is that the transition from a person with potential to a being of great power is fraught with peril and must generally be midwifed by others who have survived the process. Doro lets them sink or swim but is aware of how much time and genetic material is lost with each failure. Another twist is that, while the most powerful are most likely to be able to help each other, they are also natural enemies who are bent on killing each other…usually.</p>
<p>The star of this book is Mary, a distant descendant, who transitions successfully, but in so doing becomes <em>almost</em> more powerful than Doro himself, capable of contacting and leading a whole society of powerful minds. In effect, Doro has succeeded in his program, but his progeny is ready to leave him and his rapacious dog-eat-dog society behind. They don&rsquo;t need him, he&rsquo;s too dangerous, they&rsquo;ve moved beyond him. He&rsquo;s not quite ready to let that happen, because he of course doesn&rsquo;t see it that way. Their confrontation is inevitable, as is the result.</p>
<h2>Citations</h2><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;“We don’t harm people like the Dietrichs in any way. In fact they’re healthier and more comfortable now than they were before we found them. And the work they’re doing for us is work they enjoy.” “If they didn’t enjoy it, you’d change their minds for them.” “We might, but they wouldn’t be aware of it. They would be content.” The girl stared at her. “Do you think that makes it better?” “Not better. Kinder, in a frightening sort of way, I know. I’m not pretending that theirs is the best possible way of life, Page—although they think it is. They’re slaves and I wouldn’t trade places with them. But we, our kind, couldn’t exist long without them.” “Then maybe we shouldn’t exist! If our way is to enslave good people like the Dietrichs and let animals like my parents go free, the world would be better without us.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 2869-2876</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;unrelated to highlight: story idea froma dream: what if you had a world of owners and slaves, like elysium or like these patternists, but, instead of alowing them to build up experience from day to day, you just time-machined them back each day (or whatever) so that they couldn&rsquo;t build up a revolution?&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 2980</div></div>      </div>
      </div>
        <div class="footer">
    <div class="footer-data"><div class="footer-links"><ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/contact.php" title="">Contact</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/support.php" title="">Support</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/privacy.php" title="">Privacy</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/rights.php" title="">Rights</a></li></ul></div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="copyright">Copyright (c) 1999-2026 earthli.com. All Rights Reserved.</div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="versions">Powered by <ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore/app_news.php">earthli News 3.7</a></li><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore" title="">earthli WebCore&trade; 3.7</a></li></ul></div></div>    </div>
      </div>
  </div>  </body>
</html>
]]>
  </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
      <title type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[Dust by Hugh Howey (2012; read in 2016)]]>
  </title>
    <id>https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3219</id>
    <link href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3219"/>
    <updated>2016-02-20T16:35:36+01:00</updated>
    <author>
        <name type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[Marco von Ballmoos]]>
  </name>
      <uri>https://earthli.com/users/marco</uri>
    </author>
      <summary type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<blockquote class="quote abstract "><div>Disclaimer: these are notes I took while reading this book. They include citations I found interesting or enlightening or particularly well-written. In some cases, I&rsquo;ve pointed out which of these applies to which citation; in others, I have not. Any benefit you gain from reading these notes is... [<a class="complete-text-link" href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3219">More</a>]</div></blockquote>]]>
  </summary>
      <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<html lang="en">
  <head>
    <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/themes/ice.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/fonts/raleway.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/core/medium.css">
  </head>
  <body>
<div class="style-controls">  <div class="page">
    <div class="page-body">
<div class="info-box-top">
<p>
Published by <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_user.php?name=marco" title="Marco von Ballmoos" class="visible">marco</a> on <span class="date-time">20. Feb 2016 16:35:36 (GMT-5)</span>
</p>
<p>
Updated by <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_user.php?name=marco" title="Marco von Ballmoos" class="visible">marco</a> on <span class="date-time">8. Dec 2023 21:09:14 (GMT-5)</span>
</p>
</div>
      <div class="text-flow wide">
  <blockquote class="quote abstract "><div>Disclaimer: these are notes I took while reading this book. They include citations I found interesting or enlightening or particularly well-written. In some cases, I&rsquo;ve pointed out which of these applies to which citation; in others, I have not. Any benefit you gain from reading these notes is purely incidental to the purpose they serve of reminding me what I once read. Please see Wikipedia for a summary if I&rsquo;ve failed to provide one sufficient for your purposes. If my notes serve to trigger an interest in this book, then I&rsquo;m happy for you.</div></blockquote><p>This novel picks up where <em>Shift</em> left off, with Juliette having returned to Silo 18. She&rsquo;s mayor, Lukas is head of IT, Donald is feeding Lukas and Juliette information in an effort to help them survive while Charlotte (Donald&rsquo;s sister) continues to launch drones, trying to fly far enough to see the world beyond the Silo zone. Juliette is mayor, but her people are not really behind her, because she brings tidings in which the populace is not interested. Don&rsquo;t change anything. Please. She does, though. Can&rsquo;t seem to stop picking that scab. So she digs to the other silo, goes outside to sample air, discovers things, talks to Donald and Charlene on the radio to find out more, to hear how they&rsquo;ve pieced things together while not trusting and misinterpreting and stumbling toward some form of truth. Silo 18 follows 17's lead, 18 flees to 17, then flees the silo area for good, making good on what Donald and Charlene saw. After so much misery, hope.</p>
<h2>Citations</h2><p>This book, much more than first two, digs at least a bit deeper into the teleology—insofar as it examines the grand scheme of Thurman and his crew—as well as epistemology—in that it puts every bit of &ldquo;truth&rdquo; obtained into question—and, finally, eschatology—because the truths all deal with Thurman&rsquo;s final solution—as well as ontology—in which our major players question, at least a little bit, what it all means and why they&rsquo;re there and why they should bother going on fighting for that next breath. </p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>"I’m afraid of being buried alive. I’m afraid of doing the wrong thing.”</p>
<p>“Then do nothing,” she insisted. She nearly begged him right then to put a stop to this madness, to their isolation. They could go back to sleep and leave this to the machines and to the God-awful plans of others. “Let’s not do anything,” she pleaded.</p>
<p>Her brother rose from his seat, squeezed her arm, and turned to leave. “That might be the worst thing,” he quietly said.</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 72</div></div><p>Here, we hear Donald and his sister Charlotte go back and forth, trying to figure out what the best approach is. The situation looks hopeless, best just lie down and let it pass over you. Why struggle? Because that&rsquo;s what one <em>does</em>. Everything they do seems to make things worse—e.g. the fall of silo 12—but <em>not</em> doing anything might be even worse than that, as Thurman and his cohort have no analogous qualms.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;She saw those chapters to mean that tearing a world down was a simple affair; the gravity of human nature tugged willingly. It was the building up afterward that proved complex. It was what to replace injustice with that very few gave thought to. Always with the tearing down, she said, as if the scraps and ashes could be pieced back together.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 87</div></div><p>This is Juliette, essentially realizing that, duh, entropy, right?</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;And now she recalled how distant these meetings seemed while working in the depths of the silo. Often, she and her friends only heard what was being discussed and what rules were being passed after it had already happened. Not only was it a far climb, but most of them were too busy surviving the day-to-day to trudge anywhere for a discussion on tomorrows.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 92</div></div><p>This is an apt description of how our beneficent leaders get away with so much evil in our name. And, once they realize how easily they are allowed to rule by a distracted populace, well…they will quickly conclude that it&rsquo;s in their best interests to keep us distracted.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;She wanted to calm these people down, to tell them she meant well, that she could fix this if they would just let her try.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 95</div></div><p>But if you know things no one else knows and they don&rsquo;t allow logic to rule their world, if you don&rsquo;t have enough evidence or they discount it or pretend some things never happened, then are you not viewed as a person espousing a religion? What, in net effect, is the difference?</p>
<p><a href="https://www.earthli.com/data/news/attachments/entry/3219/constantine-movie-keanu-reeves-hell-jump-demon.jpg"><img src="https://www.earthli.com/data/news/attachments/entry/3219/constantine-movie-keanu-reeves-hell-jump-demon_tn.jpg" alt=" " class=" align-right"></a>People don&rsquo;t, in general, want new and better for everyone—just yours truly. And Juliette wants to take them forward by changing everything. But they want everything to go back to the way it was. But don&rsquo;t they want to know the truth? No. Truth is a luxury. It is unnecessary when your only goal is survival, when you can&rsquo;t see the connection between knowledge and material improvement. And even if you can show the connection, by all means, hurry. Or you&rsquo;ll lose your audience, who you were trying to save, but who will fight you each step of the way, dragging you down into their quagmire of ignorance.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The only thing more impressive to Juliette than the depths of the conspiracy had been the speed and relief with which its mechanisms had crumbled within IT. The men and women of level thirty-four reminded her of the children of Silo 17, frightened and wide-eyed and desperate for some adult they could cling to and trust. This foray of hers to test the outside air was looked upon with suspicion and fear elsewhere in the silo, but in IT, where they had pretended to do this work for generations, the chance to truly investigate had been seized by many with wild abandon.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 124</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;“It doesn’t bother me that I won’t be around one day,” Lukas said after a while. “I don’t stress about the fact that I wasn’t here a hundred years ago. I think death will be a lot like that. A hundred years from now my life will be just like it was a hundred years ago.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 156</div></div><p>That is the hope of the silo dwellers, because it has to be. For us, though, it&rsquo;s not the same is it? On Spaceship Earth? Or must we also dial back our expectations of growth, of constant expansion? Can we expand in our minds without expanding our physical demands on our surroundings? Or must we also expect/hope that things will be the same a century from now?</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;There was a rattle in Donald’s chest, a flapping of some loosely connected thing, an internal alarm that his condition was deteriorating – that he was getting worse. He forced himself to cough, as much as he hated to, as much as his diaphragm was sore from the effort, as much as his throat burned and muscles ached. He leaned forward in his chair and hacked until something deep inside him tore loose and skittered across his tongue, was spat into his square of fetid cloth.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 167</div></div><p>I just thought that passage was so visceral.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;“Their fear doesn’t just color the world they see,” he said, his eyes wild. “They poison the world with it. It’s a toxin, this fear. They send their own out to clean, and that poisons the world!”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 176</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Someone to save. The folly of man – the folly of the blasted silos he had helped to build – this assumption that things needed saving. They ought to have been left on their own, both people and the planet. Mankind had the right to go extinct. That’s what life did: it went extinct. It made room for the next in line. But individual men had often railed against the natural order. They had their illegally cloned children, their nano treatments, their spare parts, and their cryopods. Individual men like those who did this.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 208</div></div><p>Despite all of the pseudo-philosophical whitewashing, the best-laid and most lofty plans often boil down to me gettin&rsquo; mine, Jack. This particular group had done it although they&rsquo;d already had the world in the palm of their hands, but drove themselves so mad that they convinced themselves someone was coming to take it, so they destroyed it in order to save it. As the U.S. did to Vietnam et al.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;She had been woken up by her brother into a nightmare, and yet she remembered the world from before, a world of blue skies and green grass. She had glimpsed that world with her drone. If she had been born into this, had never known anything else, would she want to be told? To be awoken? Would she want someone to tell her the truth?&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 308</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>Listen, I swear to you, I don’t know what you’re talking about. I … this will be hard for you to believe, maybe, but I remember when the world out there was very different. When we could live and breathe out there. And I think part of it can be like that again. Is like that right now. That’s what my brother wanted to tell you, that there’s hope out there.”</p>
<p>A pause. A heavy breath. Charlotte’s arm was back to throbbing.</p>
<p>“Hope.”</p>
<p>Charlotte waited. The radio hissed at her like an angry breath forced through clenched teeth.</p>
<p>“My home, my people, are dead and you would have me hope. I’ve seen the hope you dish out, the bright blue skies we pull down over our heads, the lie that makes the exiled do your bidding, clean for you. I’ve seen it, and thank God I knew to doubt it. It’s the intoxication of nirvana. That’s how you get us to endure this life. You promise us heaven, don’t you? But what do you know of our hell?”</p>
<p>She was right. This Juliette was right. How could such a conversation as this take place? How did her brother manage it? It was alien races who somehow spoke the same tongue. It was gods and mortals. Charlotte was attempting to commune with ants, ants who worried about the twists of their warrens beneath the soil, not the layout of the wider land. She wouldn’t be able to get them to see […]</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 311</div></div><p>And here I don&rsquo;t think that Charlotte really considered herself a God in any sense. Just that the gap between experiences was too large to bridge. Of course Charlotte&rsquo;s silo was much more advanced than Juliette&rsquo;s—by design. But Juliette, with her scientific/engineering bent, was arguably better equipped to live in and extend the technology of the world of Silo 1 than Charlotte, who was, at best, a cog in the machine and not very aware of how anything in her magical and more advanced world worked.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>“But it seems about right. Don’t it seem like a clock ticking down? Either the gods knew how much to stock away, or they don’t have plans for us past a certain date. Makes you feel like pig’s milk, don’t it? Anyhow, that’s how it seems to me.”</p>
<p>Juliette turned and studied her albino friend, saw the way the green emergency lights gave him a sort of eerie glow.</p>
<p>“Maybe,” Juliette said. “Gina may’ve been on to something.”</p>
<p>Raph sniffed. “Yeah, but fuckit. We’ll be long dead before then.”</p>
<p>He laughed at this, his voice echoing up and down the stairs, but the sentiment made Juliette sad. Not just that everyone she knew would be dead before that date ever happened, but that this knowledge made it easier to stomach an awful and morbid truth: Their days were counted. The idea of saving anything was folly, a life especially. No life had ever been truly saved, not in the history of mankind. They were merely prolonged. Everything comes to an end.</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 330</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The nice man with the dark whiskers seemed to be arguing a point. The man in the white blanket just frowned and stood there. Now and then, one or both of them would glance at Elise, and she worried they were talking about her. Maybe they were talking about how to find Puppy.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 337</div></div><p>This is most likely meant to be endearing. the wide-eyed innocent. Are we all like that, though, regardless of how clever and attentive we think we are? Are we all wide-eyed naïfs when compared to those cleverer and better-informed than we are? Each of us has certain information and a certain intellect, each of us thinking we know what&rsquo;s going on. There are not only the different contexts of the child, Elise, the churchfolk, the mechs, each with their own agenda and view on things. but then there&rsquo;s also the other layer of how the reader is likely to interpret the situation based on their own unique context. So here we see Elise interpreting what&rsquo;s going on based on her own worldview, which is a seven-year–old&rsquo;s, consumed by her own needs—her hunger and Puppy. They are likely discussing something weightier, like how not to die in the next 24 hours. The reader, on the other hand, might find it cute that Elise is worried about Puppy and is naive about the worries of the world (awww, the child makes it all worth it!) or might be annoyed with her because she&rsquo;s constantly distracting people from more worthwhile work. Or they might think she&rsquo;s doing everyone a favor—whether she knows it or not—by distracting them from the larger job of long-term survival—which daunts and depresses with its impossibility—and forcing them to focus on short-term tasks that <em>can</em> be achieved, but that lead nowhere. Is that better than nothing? Or are the constant distractions the <em>reason</em> why the long-term goal is impossible?</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Darcy made sure the safety was off. He gripped the handle on the door and threw it up, then crouched down and aimed his flashlight and pistol into the gloom. He very nearly shot up someone’s bedroll. There was a rumpled pile of pillows and blankets that looked at first like a person sleeping. He saw more of the folders like the ones he’d helped gather from the conference room. This was probably where the man they’d snagged had been hiding. He’d have to show Brevard and get the place cleaned up. <strong>He couldn’t imagine living like that, like a rat.</strong> (Emphasis added.)&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 347</div></div><p>This is a nice ironic juxtaposition between a rat in a larger cage feeling pity for a rat in a smaller one. We in our expansive world can see how limited Darcy&rsquo;s own situation is, but could we understand how someone with a galactic view would find our being &ldquo;trapped&rdquo; on Earth to be confining as well?</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The cryopods and shifts were exaggerated forms of sleep, he thought. What seemed unnatural was more a matter of degree than of kind. Cave bears hibernated for a season. Humans hibernated each night. Daytime was a shift, each one endured like a quantum of life, all the short-term planning leading up to another bout of darkness, little thought given to stringing those days into something useful, some chain of valuable pearls. Just another day to survive.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 355</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;“The world isn’t gone,” Charlotte confirmed. “Just our piece of it.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 358</div></div><p>And good riddance to mankind, considering what a mess they&rsquo;ve made of the planet. The planet is probably better off without him.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;He hesitated, ran his hands across her words, remembering what he’d done. He had killed the one person trying to help him, the one person who loved him. The one person reaching out to these silos to help. All because of his own guilt and self-loathing for loving her back.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 360</div></div><p>Here Donald confabulates a past that never really happened that way, forgetting that Anna had manipulated him into that nightmarish situation in the first place, and did it for her own personal gain. When she later &ldquo;saw the light&rdquo;, her motives were purer, but the interpretation above, while believable as a confabulation, is far too generous.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;[…] the evidence already of vandalism and theft, the long stretches of wire and pipe gone missing, the scattering of stalk and leaf and soil from those hurrying away with stolen plants. She hoped to rise above the injustices strewn about her, to escape this last spasm of civility before chaos reigned. It was coming, she knew. But as high as she and Raph climbed, there were people throwing open doors to explore and loot, to claim territory, to yell down from landings some finding or shout up some question. In the depths of Mechanical, she had lamented how few had survived. And now it seemed like so many.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 383</div></div><p>This is the reward for believing in a higher purpose. Almost no-one else cares about your long-term goals, unless they happen to dovetail with their own short-term ones.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;And her annoyance with the Planning Committee and Father Wendel’s congregation was misplaced, she thought. Had her mechanics not lashed out? Was she not lashing out right then? What was any group but a bunch of people? And what were people but animals as prone to fear as rats at the sound of boots?&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 384</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>“What do you think is going on in all those other silos right now?” Charlotte asked. “You dealt with them. Is it as bad there as it is here?”</p>
<p>Donald considered this. “I don’t know. Some of them are happy enough, I suppose. They get married and have kids. They have jobs. They don’t know anything beyond their walls, so I guess they don’t have some of the stress about what’s out there that you and I feel. But I think they have something else that we don’t have, this deep feeling that something is wrong with how they’re living. Buried, you know. And we understand that, and it chokes us, but they just have this chronic anxiety, I think. I don’t know.” He shrugged. “I’ve seen men happy enough here to get through their shifts. I’ve watched others go mad. I used to … I used to play solitaire for hours on my computer upstairs, and that’s when my brain was truly off and I wasn’t miserable. But then, I wasn’t really alive, either.”</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 394</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>But you know what I think? I think they knew that if a war broke out between all these invisible machines, that some pockets of people would survive here and there. So they built this. They made sure the destruction was complete so they could control it.”</p>
<p>“They wanted to make sure the only pockets of people who survived were in their pockets,” Charlotte said. “Exactly. They weren’t trying to save the world – they were trying to save themselves.</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 395</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;How did they think they would ever contain all this? That something like this wouldn’t happen?” “I don’t know,” Donald said. “Maybe the kinds of people who try to shape the world feel like they’re smarter than chaos itself.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 396</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;They reminded her why she was doing this, what she was fighting for, what was worth fighting for. A rage had built up inside of her, a single-minded pursuit of digging through the earth down below and digging for answers outside. And she had lost sight of this, these things worth saving. She had been too concerned with those who deserved to be damned. This anger melted as Elise clung to her neck and Solo’s beard scratched her face. Here was what was left, what they still had, and protecting it was more important than vengeance. That’s what Father Wendel had discovered. He had been reading the wrong passages in his book, passages of hate rather than hope. And Juliette had been just as blind. She had been prepared to rush off and leave everyone behind.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 408</div></div><p>Or…the short-term, the shortsighted goal eclipses the more real and more communally beneficial goal. Or was the suicide attack the selfish solution?</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Juliette turned and gazed at the blank wallscreen. She wondered if it was all a dream. This was what happened to the dying soul; it scrambled for some perch, some stairway to cling to, some way not to fall. She had cleaned and died on that hill outside her silo. She had never loved Lukas at all. Never gotten to know him properly. This was a land of ghosts and fiction, events held together with all the vacant solidarity of dreams, all the nonsense of a drunken mind.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 425</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;She passed through the spot where she’d hugged her brother, and any plan of escape wilted. She had little desire to carry on. Her brother was gone. The world was gone. Even if she lived to see green grass and eat one more MRE, cut her lip on one more can of water … why?&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 435</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;She imagined the world they might build with time and resources, with no rules but what’s best and no one to pin down their dreams. “I think we’ll make it,” she finally said. “I think we can make any damn thing we like.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 458</div></div><p>And, in the end, despite everything else in the story, a message of hope. A bit contrived, at the very end.</p>
<h2>Errata</h2><p>None.</p>
      </div>
      </div>
        <div class="footer">
    <div class="footer-data"><div class="footer-links"><ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/contact.php" title="">Contact</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/support.php" title="">Support</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/privacy.php" title="">Privacy</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/rights.php" title="">Rights</a></li></ul></div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="copyright">Copyright (c) 1999-2026 earthli.com. All Rights Reserved.</div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="versions">Powered by <ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore/app_news.php">earthli News 3.7</a></li><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore" title="">earthli WebCore&trade; 3.7</a></li></ul></div></div>    </div>
      </div>
  </div>  </body>
</html>
]]>
  </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
      <title type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[Cloud Atlas by David Mitchell (read in 2015)]]>
  </title>
    <id>https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3155</id>
    <link href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3155"/>
    <updated>2016-02-15T22:45:24+01:00</updated>
    <author>
        <name type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[Marco von Ballmoos]]>
  </name>
      <uri>https://earthli.com/users/marco</uri>
    </author>
      <summary type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<blockquote class="quote abstract "><div>Disclaimer: these are notes I took while reading this book. They include citations I found interesting or enlightening or particularly well-written. In some cases, I&rsquo;ve pointed out which of these applies to which citation; in others, I have not. Any benefit you gain from reading these notes is... [<a class="complete-text-link" href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3155">More</a>]</div></blockquote>]]>
  </summary>
      <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<html lang="en">
  <head>
    <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/themes/ice.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/fonts/raleway.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/core/medium.css">
  </head>
  <body>
<div class="style-controls">  <div class="page">
    <div class="page-body">
<div class="info-box-top">
<p>
Published by <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_user.php?name=marco" title="Marco von Ballmoos" class="visible">marco</a> on <span class="date-time">15. Feb 2016 22:45:24 (GMT-5)</span>
</p>
<p>
Updated by <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_user.php?name=marco" title="Marco von Ballmoos" class="visible">marco</a> on <span class="date-time">16. Feb 2016 07:40:14 (GMT-5)</span>
</p>
</div>
      <div class="text-flow wide">
  <blockquote class="quote abstract "><div>Disclaimer: these are notes I took while reading this book. They include citations I found interesting or enlightening or particularly well-written. In some cases, I&rsquo;ve pointed out which of these applies to which citation; in others, I have not. Any benefit you gain from reading these notes is purely incidental to the purpose they serve of reminding me what I once read. Please see Wikipedia for a summary if I&rsquo;ve failed to provide one sufficient for your purposes. If my notes serve to trigger an interest in this book, then I&rsquo;m happy for you.</div></blockquote><p>This is a well-written and far-reaching book. All the more so considering the many narrators, voices and dialects used for the several distinct sections, each of which also took place at a different time in our past or future. It&rsquo;s written in several parts: the first five parts are from different narrators and each subsequent one picks up the story by somehow mentioning the writings of the previous narrator, however obliquely.</p>
<p>Each piece builds on the previous one, laddering up through the years into a future where humanity is reduced to tribes on islands visited by leftover vestiges of more advanced but increasingly desperate humanity. With the middle part of 11, we retreat back through the narrators, in reverse order, until we arrive where we started, having perhaps learned something of humanity&rsquo;s reach and maybe something about souls and reincarnation.</p>
<p>The writing is top-notch and the stories intriguing and connected in oblique but interesting ways. This is a challenging book to read because of the spiced chronology and the telling of an overarching philosophy through six individual stories which, though connected, also would mostly stand on their own. Instead of summarizing further, I forward you to the <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cloud_Atlas_(novel)">Wikipedia article</a>. While accurate, I doubt that very much of it will make sense until <em>after</em> you&rsquo;ve read the book.</p>
<p>The citations mostly highlight my favorite bits of writing. I like Frobisher&rsquo;s narration the best of all of them, though Cavendish came a close second. Throughout Frobisher&rsquo;s bits are phantom suggestions of a haunting bit of music called <em>The Cloud Atlas Sextet</em> … and the writing makes you positively <em>desperate</em> to actually hear it.</p>
<p>The patois of Zachary in the middle segment was a work of dedication on both the part of the author and whoever had to edit it.</p>
<h2>Citations</h2><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Rather doubt her interest in the Frobishery’s memsahibs was genuine, but the woman likes to watch me talk, so I painted witty caricatures of my estranged clan for my hostess’s amusement. Made us all sound so gay, almost felt homesick.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 55</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;At a prim and proper public garden named Minnewater Park, courting couples ambled arm in arm between willows, banksia roses, and chaperones. Blind, emaciated fiddler performed for coins. Now he could play. Requested “Bonsoir, Paris!” and he performed with such élan I pressed a crisp five-franc note into his hand. He removed his dark glasses, checked the watermark, invoked his pet saint’s name, gathered his coppers, and scarpered through the flower beds, laughing like a madcap. <strong>Whoever opined “Money can’t buy you happiness” obviously had far too much of the stuff.</strong>&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 75</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;dreamt of a … nightmarish café, brilliantly lit, but underground, with no way out. I’d been dead a long, long time. The waitresses all had the same face. The food was soap, the only drink was cups of lather. The music in the café was”—he wagged an exhausted finger at the MS—“this.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 79</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;ever since a disciple of the Buddha preached on the spot centuries ago, every bandit king, tyrant, and monarch of that kingdom has enhanced it with marble towers, scented arboretums, gold-leafed domes, lavished murals on its vaulted ceilings, set emeralds into the eyes of its statuettes. When the temple finally equals its counterpart in the Pure Land, so the story goes, that day humanity shall have fulfilled its purpose, and Time itself shall come to an end. To men like Ayrs, it occurs to me, this temple is civilization. <strong>The masses, slaves, peasants, and foot soldiers exist in the cracks of its flagstones, ignorant even of their ignorance.</strong> Not so the great statesmen, scientists, artists, and most of all, the composers of the age, any age, who are civilization’s architects, masons, and priests. Ayrs sees our role is to make civilization ever more resplendent. My employer’s profoundest, or only, wish is to create a minaret that inheritors of Progress a thousand years from now will point to and say, “Look, there is Vyvyan Ayrs!” How vulgar, this hankering after immortality, how vain, how false. Composers are merely scribblers of cave paintings. <strong>One writes music because winter is eternal and because, if one didn’t, the wolves and blizzards would be at one’s throat all the sooner.</strong>&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 81</div></div><p>Why create? For immortality? For riches? Or just because it&rsquo;s better than doing nothing? Because it staves off thoughts of ending it all?</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Ayrs can’t see further than Eternal Recurrence, but Eva is due back in ten days, and that hawkeyed creature will sniff out a decomposing secret in a jiffy.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 85</div></div><p>Timothy Cavendish:</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;<strong>Sometimes the fluffy bunny of incredulity zooms round the bend so rapidly that the greyhound of language is left, agog, in the starting cage.</strong> A feisty stagger was needed to reach the next train before it left—only to find it had been canceled! But, “luckily,” the train before mine was so late that it still hadn’t departed. All the seats were taken, and I had to squeeze into a three-inch slot. I lost my balance when the train pulled away, but a human crumple zone buffered my fall. We stayed like that, half fallen. The Diagonal People.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 168</div></div><p>An Orison of Somni-451:</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;‘Unlimited power in the hands of limited people always leads to cruelty.’ ” Warlock-Williams looked at me as if I had spoken in tongues. “Solzhenitsyn.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 180</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;You show xtraordinary erudition for an eighth-stratum, Archivist. I wonder if you encountered this dictum first spoken by a twentieth-century statesman: <strong>“An abyss cannot be crossed in two steps.”</strong>&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 327</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The Abbess nodded. If consumers found fulfillment at any meaningful level, she xtemporized, corpocracy would be finished. Thus, Media is keen to scorn colonies such as hers, comparing them to tapeworms; accusing them of stealing rainwater from WaterCorp, royalties from VegCorp patent holders, oxygen from Air-Corp. The Abbess feared that, should the day ever come when the Board decided they were a viable alternative to corpocratic ideology, “the ‘tapeworms’ will be renamed ‘terrorists,’ smart bombs will rain, and our tunnels flood with fire.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 332</div></div><p>Even in the future, Mitchell sees the same patterns repeated. The enemy is change, the unsatisfied and oppressed terrorists.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Purebloods played cards, ate noodles, smoked, worked at sonys, joked, engaged in ordinary life. How could they know what happened in the underbelly and just … sit there, indifferent? As if it were not living fabricants being processed but pickled sardines? Why did their consciences not scream for this obscenity to end?&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 345</div></div><p>This sounds like a well-argued plea for vegetarianism in our time. If it is inhumane to grow fabricants—human simulacra—for all sorts of purposes then why is it humane to grow animals for food?</p>
<p>From the point of view of Timothy Cavendish.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;logistics. That fancy electric lock on the gate, for example, I could take it apart blindfolded if I had the mind to, but what about a vehicle on the other side? Money? Boltholes? You see, without logistics, where are you? Belly-up is where, and in the back of Withers’s van five minutes later.” Mr. Meeks screwed up his gnomish features and ground out the only two coherent words he had retained: “I know! I know!” Before I could discern whether or not Ernie Blacksmith was warning me or sounding me out, Veronica came in through the interior door wearing a hat of ice-melting scarlet. I just stopped myself from bowing. “Good afternoon, Mrs. Costello.” “Mr. Cavendish, how pleasant. Wandering abroad in this biting cold?” “Scouting,” Ernie answered, “for his one-man escape committee.” “Oh, once you’ve been initiated into the Elderly, the world doesn’t want you back.” Veronica settled herself in a rattan chair and adjusted her hat just so. “We—&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 360</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;“We—by whom I mean anyone over sixty—commit two offenses just by existing. One is Lack of Velocity. We drive too slowly, walk too slowly, talk too slowly. <strong>The world will do business with dictators, perverts, and drug barons of all stripes, but being slowed down it cannot abide.</strong> Our second offence is being Everyman’s memento mori. The world can only get comfy in shiny-eyed denial if we are out of sight.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 360</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;That is more or less it. Middle age is flown, but it is attitude, not years, that condemns one to the ranks of the Undead, or else proffers salvation. In the domain of the young there dwells many an Undead soul. They rush about so, their inner putrefaction is concealed for a few decades, that is all.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 390</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Exposition: the workings of the actual past + the virtual past may be illustrated by an event well known to collective history, such as the sinking of the Titanic. The disaster as it actually occurred descends into obscurity as its eyewitnesses die off, documents perish + the wreck of the ship dissolves in its Atlantic grave. <strong>Yet a virtual sinking of the Titanic, created from reworked memories, papers, hearsay, fiction—in short, belief—grows ever “truer.” The actual past is brittle, ever-dimming + ever more problematic to access + reconstruct: in contrast, the virtual past is malleable, ever-brightening + ever more difficult to circumvent/expose as fraudulent.</strong> The present presses the virtual past into its own service, to lend credence to its mythologies + legitimacy to the imposition of will. Power seeks + is the right to “landscape” the virtual past. (He who pays the historian calls the tune)&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 392</div></div><p>Frobisher again (Part 2).</p>
<p>I thought &ldquo;ballooning&rdquo; below was really, really visual.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Spent last night working on a rumbling ’cello allegro lit by explosive triplets. Silence punctuated by breakneck mousetraps. Remember the church clock chiming three A.M. “I heard an owl,” Huckleberry Finn says, “away off, who-whooing about somebody that was dead, and a whippowill and a dog crying about somebody that was going to die.” Always haunted me, that line. Next thing I know, <strong>Lucille was ballooning sheets of bright morning by the window.</strong>&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 439</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;“Another war is always coming, Robert. They are never properly extinguished. <strong>What sparks wars? The will to power, the backbone of human nature.</strong> The threat of violence, the fear of violence, or actual violence is the instrument of this dreadful will. You can see the will to power in bedrooms, kitchens, factories, unions, and the borders of states. Listen to this and remember it. The nation-state is merely human nature inflated to monstrous proportions. QED, nations are entities whose laws are written by violence. Thus it ever was, so ever shall it be. War, Robert, is one of humanity’s two eternal companions.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 444</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;“Oh, diplomacy,” said M.D., in his element, “it mops up war’s spillages; legitimizes its outcomes; gives the strong state the means to impose its will on a weaker one, while saving its fleets and battalions for weightier opponents. Only professional diplomats, inveterate idiots, and women view diplomacy as a long-term substitute for war.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 444</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;You know, having the roof over one’s head dependent upon the good offices of an employer is a loathsome way to live. Christ only knows how the serving classes stand it. Are the Frobishery domestics forever biting their tongues as I must? one wonders.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 447</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Reception a rarely manned nook under the stairs.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 469</div></div><p>This brings to mind the Sully Hôtel off of rue Saint Antione in Paris. They have their reception in <em>exactly</em> such an isolated, dark and largely empty nook.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Cowardice is nothing to do with it—suicide takes considerable courage. Japanese have the right idea. <strong>No, what’s selfish is to demand another to endure an intolerable existence, just to spare families, friends, and enemies a bit of soul-searching.</strong> The only selfishness lies in ruining strangers’ days by forcing ’em to witness a grotesqueness.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 470</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Pater’ll sigh, “It’s no Eroica, is it?” and stuff it into a drawer; but it’s an incomparable creation. Echoes of Scriabin’s White Mass, Stravinsky’s lost footprints, chromatics of the more lunar Debussy, but truth is I don’t know where it came from. Waking dream. Will never write anything one-hundredth as good. Wish I were being immodest, but I’m not. Cloud Atlas Sextet holds my life, is my life, <strong>now I’m a spent firework; but at least I’ve been a firework.</strong>&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 470</div></div><p>Adam Ewing:</p>
<p>Lovely, tight description, evocative. The scene springs to life in great detail from just a few words.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The Societies loomed larger &amp; after three weeks of oceanic grays &amp; blazing blues, our eyes rejoiced at the moss-drenched mountain faces, aglint with cataracts, daubed with cacophonous jungle. The Prophetess cleared fifteen fathoms, yet so clear was the water, iridescent corals were visible&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 475</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;On the beach of Bethlehem Cove we fought &amp; some of us fell. Had our pistols not won that first week’s battles, well, the Raiatea Mission should have remained a dream. But it was the will of the Lord that we light his beacon here &amp; keep it burning. After a half year we could bring over our womenfolk from Tahiti. I regret the Native deaths, but once the Indians saw how God protects his flock, why, even the Spartans were begging us to send preachers.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 478</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Mrs. Wagstaff’s contempt for her young husband, if bottled, could have been vended as rat poison. “Mr. Ewing will think whatever Mr. Ewing will think. Then, tomorrow, he will leave on his handsome schooner, taking his thinkings with him. Unlike you &amp; I, Mr. Wagstaff, who’ll die here. Soon, I pray God.” She turned to me. <strong>“My husband could not compleat his schooling, sir, so it is my sorry lot to explain the obvious, ten times a day.”</strong>&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 484</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;<strong>Mrs. Horrox seized the rudder of conversation ere we ran onto reefs.</strong> “Your employers evince great faith in your talents, Mr. Ewing, to entrust you with business necessitating such a long &amp; arduous voyage.” I replied that, yes, I was a senior enough notary to be entrusted with my present assignment, but a junior enough scrivener to be obligated to accept the same. Knowing clucks rewarded my humility.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 487</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Our own century shall witness humanity’s tribes fulfill those prophecies writ in their racial traits. The superior shall relegate the overpopulous savages to their natural numbers. Unpleasant scenes may ensue, but men of intellectual courage must not flinch.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 488</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Henry obliged. “Our weaponry was not dropped onto our laps one morning. It is not manna from Sinai’s skies. Since Agincourt, the White man has refined &amp; evolved the gunpowder sciences until our modern armies may field muskets by the tens of thousands! ‘Aha!’ you will ask, yes, ‘But why us Aryans? Why not the Unipeds of Ur or the Mandrakes of Mauritius?’ <strong>Because, Preacher, of all the world’s races, our love—or rather our rapacity—for treasure, gold, spices &amp; dominion, oh, most of all, sweet dominion, is the keenest, the hungriest, the most unscrupulous! This rapacity, yes, powers our Progress; for ends infernal or divine I know not. Nor do you know, sir. Nor do I overly care. I feel only gratitude that my Maker cast me on the winning side.”</strong>&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 489</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;I ventured that Henry might practice a little reserve when disagreeing with our host. “Dearest Adam, I was practicing reserve, &amp; more than a little! I longed to shout this at the old fool:—’Why tinker with the plain truth that we hurry the darker races to their graves in order to take their land &amp; its riches? Wolves don’t sit in their caves, concocting crapulous theories of race to justify devouring a flock of sheep! “Intellectual courage”? True “intellectual courage” is to dispense with these fig leaves &amp; admit all peoples are predatory, but White predators, with our deadly duet of disease dust &amp; firearms, are examplars of predacity par excellence, &amp; what of it?’&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 490</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;As with cooks, doctors, notaries, clergymen, captains &amp; kings, might evangelists also not be some good, some bad? Maybe the Indians of the Societies &amp; the Chathams would be happiest “undiscovered,” but to say so is to cry for the moon. Should we not applaud Mr. Horrox’s &amp; his brethren’s efforts to assist the Indian’s climb up “Civilization’s Ladder”? <strong>Is not ascent their sole salvation? I know not the answer, nor whence flew the surety of my younger years.</strong>&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 492</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;“joy shall be in heaven over one sinner that repenteth, more than over ninety &amp; nine just persons, which need no repentance.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 497</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;If we believe humanity is a ladder of tribes, a colosseum of confrontation, exploitation &amp; bestiality, such a humanity is surely brought into being, &amp; history’s Horroxes, Boerhaaves &amp; Gooses shall prevail. You &amp; I, the moneyed, the privileged, the fortunate, shall not fare so badly in this world, provided our luck holds. What of it if our consciences itch? Why undermine the dominance of our race, our gunships, our heritage &amp; our legacy? Why fight the “natural” (oh, weaselly word!) order of things?&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 508</div></div>      </div>
      </div>
        <div class="footer">
    <div class="footer-data"><div class="footer-links"><ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/contact.php" title="">Contact</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/support.php" title="">Support</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/privacy.php" title="">Privacy</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/rights.php" title="">Rights</a></li></ul></div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="copyright">Copyright (c) 1999-2026 earthli.com. All Rights Reserved.</div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="versions">Powered by <ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore/app_news.php">earthli News 3.7</a></li><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore" title="">earthli WebCore&trade; 3.7</a></li></ul></div></div>    </div>
      </div>
  </div>  </body>
</html>
]]>
  </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
      <title type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[23 Things They Don't Tell You about Capitalism by Ha-Joon Chang]]>
  </title>
    <id>https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3153</id>
    <link href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3153"/>
    <updated>2016-02-14T18:07:03+01:00</updated>
    <author>
        <name type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[Marco von Ballmoos]]>
  </name>
      <uri>https://earthli.com/users/marco</uri>
    </author>
      <summary type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<blockquote class="quote abstract "><div>Disclaimer: these are notes I took while reading this book. They include citations I found interesting or enlightening or particularly well-written. In some cases, I&rsquo;ve pointed out which of these applies to which citation; in others, I have not. Any benefit you gain from reading these notes is... [<a class="complete-text-link" href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3153">More</a>]</div></blockquote>]]>
  </summary>
      <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<html lang="en">
  <head>
    <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/themes/ice.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/fonts/raleway.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/core/medium.css">
  </head>
  <body>
<div class="style-controls">  <div class="page">
    <div class="page-body">
<div class="info-box-top">
<p>
Published by <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_user.php?name=marco" title="Marco von Ballmoos" class="visible">marco</a> on <span class="date-time">14. Feb 2016 18:07:03 (GMT-5)</span>
</p>
</div>
      <div class="text-flow wide">
  <blockquote class="quote abstract "><div>Disclaimer: these are notes I took while reading this book. They include citations I found interesting or enlightening or particularly well-written. In some cases, I&rsquo;ve pointed out which of these applies to which citation; in others, I have not. Any benefit you gain from reading these notes is purely incidental to the purpose they serve of reminding me what I once read. Please see Wikipedia for a summary if I&rsquo;ve failed to provide one sufficient for your purposes. If my notes serve to trigger an interest in this book, then I&rsquo;m happy for you.</div></blockquote><p>This is the second book I&rsquo;ve read by Chang. The first was <em>Kicking Away the Ladder</em>, which discussed how the much-ballyhooed free-market practices forced on developing countries were not used by the first-world countries when they themselves were developing. This book kind of picks up where the other left off. Instead of viewing the obvious disparity between what the developed world says and what it does in a clinical manner, Chang uses a more class-based lens to examine how the rich manipulate the story to benefit themselves. A primary part of that story is the myth of capital-C Capitalism.</p>
<p>His is a pragmatic and balanced take on what we for lack of a better word must call a global economy with a lot of useful insight and suggestions for how to break out of the vicious circle of servitude that most of us are in (all but the tippy top, of course, for whom the system works). This is absolutely a lovely companion book to Mark Blyth&rsquo;s <em>Austerity: The History of a Dangerous Idea</em>.</p>
<p>The citations below give a better idea of what he&rsquo;s all about than I could possibly do by writing a summary.</p>
<h2>Citations</h2><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Human decisions, especially decisions by those who have the power to set the rules, make things happen in the way they happen, as I will explain. Even though no single decision-maker can be sure that her actions will always lead to the desired results, the decisions that have been made are not in some sense inevitable. We do not live in the best of all possible worlds. If different decisions had been taken, the world would have been a different place. Given this, we need to ask whether the decisions that the rich and the powerful take are based on sound reasoning and robust evidence.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Foreword</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Overcoming the myth that there is such a thing as an objectively defined ‘free market’ is the first step towards understanding capitalism.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 1</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;All this does not mean that we need to take a relativist position and fail to criticize anyone because anything goes. We can (and I do) have a view on the acceptability of prevailing labour standards in China (or any other country, for that matter) and try to do something about it, without believing that those who have a different view are wrong in some absolute sense. Even though China cannot afford American wages or Swedish working conditions, it certainly can improve the wages and the working conditions of its workers.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 7</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Free-market economists may want you to believe that the correct boundaries of the market can be scientifically determined, but this is incorrect. If the boundaries of what you are studying cannot be scientifically determined, what you are doing is not a science.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 10</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Thus seen, opposing a new regulation is saying that the status quo, however unjust from some people’s point of view, should not be changed. Saying that an existing regulation should be abolished is saying that the domain of the market should be expanded, which means that those who have money should be given more power in that area, as the market is run on one-dollar-one-vote principle.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 10</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Warren Buffet, the famous financier, put this point beautifully, when he said in a television interview in 1995: ‘I personally think that society is responsible for a very significant percentage of what I’ve earned. If you stick me down in the middle of Bangladesh or Peru or someplace, you’ll find out how much this talent is going to produce in the wrong kind of soil. I will be struggling thirty years later. I work in a market system that happens to reward what I do very well – disproportionately well.’&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 30</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;[…] world were full of the self-seeking individuals found in economics textbooks, it would grind to a halt because we would be spending most of our time cheating, trying to catch the cheaters, and punishing the caught.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 41</div></div><p>Dude, you just described the U.S. of A.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;If we did that, people would feel that they are not trusted as moral agents and refuse to act in moral ways, making it necessary for us to spend a huge amount of resources monitoring, judging and punishing people. If we assume the worst about people, we will get the worst out of them.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 50</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Real interest rates of 8, 10 or 12 per cent mean that potential investors would not find non-financial investments attractive, as few such investments bring profit rates higher than 7 per cent.5 In this case, the only profitable investment is in high-risk, high-return financial assets. Even though financial investments can drive growth for a while, such growth cannot be sustained, as those investments have to be ultimately backed up by viable long-term investments in real sector activities, as so vividly shown by the 2008 financial crisis&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 56</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The dead presidents don’t talk. But if they could, they would tell Americans and the rest of the world how the policies that their successors promote today are the exact opposite of what they used in order to transform a second-rate agrarian economy dependent on slave labour into the world’s greatest industrial power.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 68</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;For the same reason why we send our children to school rather than making them compete with adults in the labour market, developing countries need to protect and nurture their producers before they acquire the capabilities to compete in the world market unassisted. Second, in the earlier stages of development, markets do not function very well for various reasons – poor transport, poor flow of information, the small size of the market that makes manipulation by big actors easier, and so on.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 71</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;For example, in the case of Britain, the share of manufacturing in total output, without counting the relative price effects (to use the jargon, in current prices), fell by over40 per cent between 1955 and 1990 (from 37 per cent to 21 per cent). However, when taking the relative price effects into account, the fall was only by just over 10 per cent (from 27 per cent to 24 per cent).3 In other words, the real demand effect – that is the demand effect after taking relative price changes into account – is small.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 94</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;More importantly, the fact that the citizens of a country work longer than others in comparable countries does not necessarily mean that they like working longer hours. They may be compelled to work long hours, even if they actually want to take longer holidays. As I pointed out above, how long a person works is affected not only by his own preference regarding work – leisure balance but also by things such as welfare provision, protection of worker rights and union power. Individuals have to take these things as given, but nations have a choice over them. They can rewrite the labour laws, beef up the welfare state and effect other policy changes to make it less necessary for individuals to work long hours.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 110</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;However, the trouble is that trickle down usually does not happen very much if left to the market. For example, once again according to the EPI, the top 10 per cent of the US population appropriated 91 per cent of income growth between 1989 and 2006, while the top 1 per cent took 59 per cent. In contrast, in countries with a strong welfare state it is a lot easier to spread the benefits of extra growth that follows upward income redistribution (if it happens) through taxes and transfers. Indeed, before taxes and transfers, income distribution is actually more unequal in Belgium and Germany than in the US, while in Sweden and the Netherlands it is more or less the same as in the US.3 In other words, we need the electric pump of the welfare state to make&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 146</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;However, the trouble is that trickle down usually does not happen very much if left to the market. For example, once again according to the EPI, the top 10 per cent of the US population appropriated 91 per cent of income growth between 1989 and 2006, while the top 1 per cent took 59 per cent. In contrast, in countries with a strong welfare state it is a lot easier to spread the benefits of extra growth that follows upward income redistribution (if it happens) through taxes and transfers. Indeed, before taxes and transfers, income distribution is actually more unequal in Belgium and Germany than in the US, while in Sweden and the Netherlands it is more or less the same as in the US.3 In other words, we need the electric pump of the welfare state to make the water at the top trickle down in any significant quantity.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 146</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;For example, in an economic downturn like today’s, the best way to boost the economy is to redistribute wealth downward, as poorer people tend to spend a higher proportion of their incomes. The economy-boosting effect of the extra billion dollar given to the lower-income households through increased welfare spending will be bigger than the same amount given to the rich through tax cuts. Moreover, if wages are not stuck at or below subsistence levels, additional income may encourage workers’ investment in education and health, which may raise their productivity and thus economic growth. In addition, greater income equality may promote social peace by reducing industrial strikes and crime, which may in turn encourage investment, as it reduces the danger of disruption to the production process and thus to the process of generating wealth.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 146</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The world is very complex and our ability to deal with it is severely limited. Therefore, we need to, and usually do, deliberately restrict our freedom of choice in order to reduce the complexity of problems we have to face. Often, government regulation works, especially in complex areas like the modern financial market, not because the government has superior knowledge but because it restricts choices and thus the complexity of the problems at hand, thereby reducing the possibility that things may go wrong.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 168</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Of course, few people would argue that markets are perfect. Even Milton Friedman admitted that there are instances in which markets fail. Pollution is a classic example. People ‘over-produce’ pollution because they are not paying for the costs of dealing with it. So what are optimal levels of pollution for individuals (or individual firms) add up to a sub-optimal level from the social point of view.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 169</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;According to Simon, we try to be rational, but our ability to be so is severely limited. The world is too complex, Simon argued, for our limited intelligence to understand fully. This means that very often the main problem we face in making a good decision is not the lack of information but our limited capability to process that information – a point nicely illustrated by the fact that the celebrated advent of the internet age does not seem to have improved the quality of our decisions, judging by the mess we are in today.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 174</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The effects of a drug, and the human body’s reaction to it, are complex. So the drug needs to be tested rigorously before we can be sure that it has enough beneficial effects that clearly overwhelm the side-effects and allow it to be sold. There is nothing exceptional about proposing to ascertain the safety of financial products before they can be sold.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 177</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;We teach our children those subjects because we believe that they will eventually enrich their lives and also make them good citizens. Even though this justification for educational spending is increasingly under attack in an age in which everything is supposed to justify its existence in terms of its contribution to productivity growth, it remains a very important – in my view, the most important – reason to invest in education.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 182</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;But an influential Marxist school of thought argues that capitalists deliberately ‘de-skill’ their workers by using the most mechanized production technologies possible, even if they are not the most economical, in order to make the workers more easily replaceable and thus easier to control.7&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 185</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;In many lines of work, what counts is general intelligence, discipline and the ability to organize oneself, rather than specialist knowledge, much of which you can, and have to, actually pick up on-the-job. So, even if what you learn in a university as a history major or a chemist may not be relevant to your work as a prospective manager in an insurance company or as a government official in the Department of Transport, the fact that you have graduated from a university tells your potential employers that you are likely to be smarter, more self-disciplined and better organized than those who have not.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 187</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The higher education system in these countries has become like a theatre in which some people decided to stand to get a better view, prompting others behind them to stand. Once enough people stand, everyone has to stand, which means that no one is getting a better view, while everyone has become more uncomfortable.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 188</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;For example, firms often do not invest enough in training their workers. This is because they are worried about their workers being poached by other firms ‘free-riding’ on their training efforts. In such a situation, the government imposing a requirement for worker training on all firms could actually raise the quality of the labour force, thereby ultimately benefiting all firms.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 198</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;But you don’t need to be a Marxist to see that regulations restricting freedom for individual firms may promote the collective interest of the entire business sector, not to speak of the nation as a whole. In other words, there are many regulations that are pro- rather than anti-business. Many regulations help preserve the common-pool resources that all firms share, while others help business by making firms do things that raise their collective productivity in the long run. Only when we recognize this will we be able to see that what matters is not the absolute amount of regulation, but the aims and contents of those regulations.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 198</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The Marxists may have been right in thinking that the development in productive forces, by increasing interdependence among different segments of capital, makes it more necessary to plan centrally. However, they failed to recognize that it also makes the economy more complex, making it more difficult to plan centrally.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 203</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;What Marx predicted was that the ‘rational’ planning approach of the capitalist firms would eventually prove superior to the wasteful anarchy of the market and thus eventually be extended to the whole economy. To be sure, he criticized planning within the firm as despotism by capitalists, but he believed that, once private property was abolished and the capitalists eliminated, the rational elements of such despotism could be isolated and harnessed for the social good.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 208</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Your environment can make you give up certain things even without trying. For example, many academically talented British working-class children do not even try to go to universities because universities are ‘not for them’. This attitude is slowly changing, but I still remember seeing a BBC documentary in the late 1980s in which an old miner and his wife were criticizing one of their sons, who had gone to a university and become a teacher, as a ‘class traitor’. While it is silly to blame everything on the socio-economic environment, it is equally unacceptable to believe that people can achieve anything if they only ‘believe in themselves’ and try hard enough, as Hollywood movies love to tell you.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 217</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Few American steelworkers or British shipbuilding workers who joined their industries in the 1960s, or for that matter anyone else, could have predicted that by the early 1990s their industries would be virtually wiped out by Japanese and Korean competition. Is it really fair that these people have to suffer disproportionately and be consigned to the scrapheap of history?&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 219</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Yes, in theory, a shoeshine boy from a poor provincial town in Peru can go to Stanford and do a PhD, as the former Peruvian President Alejandro Toledo has done, but for one Toledo we have millions of Peruvian children who did not even make it to high school. Of course, we could argue that all those millions of poor Peruvian children are lazy good-for-nothings, since Mr Toledo has proven that they too could have gone to Stanford if they had tried hard enough. But I think it is much more plausible to say that Mr Toledo is the exception.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 219</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;When some people have to run a 100 metre race with sandbags on their legs, the fact that no one is allowed to have a head start does not make the race fair. Equality of opportunity is absolutely necessary but not sufficient in building a genuinely fair and efficient society.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 220</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Of these, Portugal and Korea are the richest, with around $18,000 per capita income (in 2006), and Turkey the poorest, with per capita income of $5,400 (in 2006). The next poorest OECD member after Portugal and Korea is Greece, which has a per capita income over $24,000.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 4110-4112</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;In contrast, China’s 2007 income more than doubles from $2,360 to $5,370 and India’s by nearly three times from $950 to $2,740, when calculated in PPP terms.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 107</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;As a result, worker resistance to any industrial restructuring that involves job cuts is much greater in the US than in Europe. Most US workers are unable to put up an organized resistance, but those who can – unionized workers – will, understandably, do everything they can to preserve the current job distribution.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 226</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;We can drive our cars fast only because we have brakes. If cars had no brakes, even the most skilful drivers would not dare to drive at more than 20–30 miles per hour for fear of fatal accidents. In the same way, people can accept the risk of unemployment and the need for occasional re-tooling of their skills more willingly when they know that those experiences are not going to destroy their lives. This is why a bigger government can make people more open to change and thus make the economy more dynamic.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 230</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;However, the very liquidity of financial assets makes them potentially negative for the rest of the economy. Building a factory takes at least months, if not years, while accumulating the technological and organizational know-how needed to build a world-class company takes decades. In contrast, financial assets can be moved around and rearranged in minutes, if not seconds. This enormous gap has created huge problems, because finance capital is ‘impatient’ and seeks short-term gains&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 240</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;But this understates it. Economists are not some innocent technicians who did a decent job within the narrow confines of their expertise until they were collectively wrong-footed by a once-in-a-century disaster that no one could have predicted. Over the last three decades, economists played an important role in creating the conditions of the 2008 crisis (and dozens of smaller financial crises that came before it since the early 1980s, such as the 1982 Third World debt crisis, the 1995 Mexican peso crisis, the 1997 Asian crisis and the 1998 Russian crisis) by providing theoretical justifications for financial deregulation and the unrestrained pursuit of short-term profits. More broadly, they advanced theories that justified the policies that have led to slower growth, higher inequality, heightened job insecurity and more frequent financial crises that have dogged the world in the last three decades (see Things 2, 6, 13 and 21).&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 247</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Moreover, they supplied arguments that insist that all those economic outcomes that many people find objectionable in this world – such as rising inequality (see Thing 13), sky-high executive salaries (see Thing 14) or extreme poverty in poor countries (see Thing 3) – are really inevitable, given (selfish and rational) human nature and the need to reward people according to their productive contributions.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 248</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;So capitalism, yes, but we need to end our love affair with unrestrained free-market capitalism, which has served humanity so poorly, and install a better-regulated variety. What that variety would be depends on our goals, values and beliefs.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 254</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;If we are really serious about preventing another crisis like the 2008 meltdown, we should simply ban complex financial instruments, unless they can be unambiguously shown to benefit society in the long run. This idea will be dismissed by some as outrageous. It’s not. We do that all the time with other products – think about the safety standards for food, drugs, automobiles and aeroplanes. What would result is an approval process whereby the impact of each new financial instrument, concocted by ‘rocket scientists’ within financial firms, is assessed in terms of risks and rewards to our system as a whole in the long run, and not just in terms of short-term profits for those firms.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 254</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Free-market ideology is built on the belief that people won’t do anything ‘good’ unless they are paid for it or punished for not doing it. This belief is then applied asymmetrically and reconceived as the view that rich people need to be motivated to work by further riches, while poor people must fear poverty for their motivation.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 255</div></div>      </div>
      </div>
        <div class="footer">
    <div class="footer-data"><div class="footer-links"><ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/contact.php" title="">Contact</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/support.php" title="">Support</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/privacy.php" title="">Privacy</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/rights.php" title="">Rights</a></li></ul></div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="copyright">Copyright (c) 1999-2026 earthli.com. All Rights Reserved.</div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="versions">Powered by <ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore/app_news.php">earthli News 3.7</a></li><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore" title="">earthli WebCore&trade; 3.7</a></li></ul></div></div>    </div>
      </div>
  </div>  </body>
</html>
]]>
  </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
      <title type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[The Futurological Congress: From the Memoirs of Ijon Tichy by Stanislaw Lem (read in 2015)]]>
  </title>
    <id>https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3152</id>
    <link href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3152"/>
    <updated>2016-02-14T17:50:42+01:00</updated>
    <author>
        <name type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[Marco von Ballmoos]]>
  </name>
      <uri>https://earthli.com/users/marco</uri>
    </author>
      <summary type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<blockquote class="quote abstract "><div>Disclaimer: these are notes I took while reading this book. They include citations I found interesting or enlightening or particularly well-written. In some cases, I&rsquo;ve pointed out which of these applies to which citation; in others, I have not. Any benefit you gain from reading these notes is... [<a class="complete-text-link" href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3152">More</a>]</div></blockquote>]]>
  </summary>
      <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<html lang="en">
  <head>
    <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/themes/ice.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/fonts/raleway.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/core/medium.css">
  </head>
  <body>
<div class="style-controls">  <div class="page">
    <div class="page-body">
<div class="info-box-top">
<p>
Published by <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_user.php?name=marco" title="Marco von Ballmoos" class="visible">marco</a> on <span class="date-time">14. Feb 2016 17:50:42 (GMT-5)</span>
</p>
<p>
Updated by <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_user.php?name=marco" title="Marco von Ballmoos" class="visible">marco</a> on <span class="date-time">14. Feb 2016 17:51:05 (GMT-5)</span>
</p>
</div>
      <div class="text-flow wide">
  <blockquote class="quote abstract "><div>Disclaimer: these are notes I took while reading this book. They include citations I found interesting or enlightening or particularly well-written. In some cases, I&rsquo;ve pointed out which of these applies to which citation; in others, I have not. Any benefit you gain from reading these notes is purely incidental to the purpose they serve of reminding me what I once read. Please see Wikipedia for a summary if I&rsquo;ve failed to provide one sufficient for your purposes. If my notes serve to trigger an interest in this book, then I&rsquo;m happy for you.</div></blockquote><p>This is a surrealist romp by the master of speculative non-hard science fiction, Stanislaw Lem. In this one, we meet the narrator Ijon Tichy, who is so wonderfully written and who is so convincing, that one quickly wonders whether the eponymous congress actually exists. It doesn&rsquo;t. The Congress takes place in Costa Rica, a convocation of the best and brightest minds that looks to tackle the problem of the future for the whole of planet Earth. In particular, they are to tackle the problem of population. Everything that follows may or may not have taken place, because of the copious amounts of mind-altering substances ingested both deliberately and accidentally by the author.</p>
<p>There is possibly an attack by militants on the hotel. There are supposedly psychotropic drugs in the water. Who put them there? To what end? Tichy ends up in the sewer (or does he?) and wakes up several more times, each time believing simultaneously that he is both closer and farther from the &ldquo;true&rdquo; reality. We hear extravagant stories of psychotropic schemes put into place to both control and appease humanity, utopian dreams through chemistry.</p>
<p>At this point, we wonder how he can even tell which is the real reality—is it the one with which he&rsquo;s the most familiar? How does he even know when he was first dosed? When does real life begin? Is life with propaganda—both mental and chemical—real? Tichy lives seemingly long swathes of life only to discover that it all wasn&rsquo;t real, was all due to other, more sophisticated chemicals. Until he finally wakes up. And that&rsquo;s real. Right?</p>
<p>It is now real reality (or so he thinks) with the world <em>massively</em> overpopulated and in the midst of an impending environmental disaster. Tichy tried to end it all, but ends up only waking from his fevered onion-skin–like dreams to the second day of the Congress.</p>
<h2>Citations</h2><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Publishers of Liberated Literature, and the Phillumenist&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 77-77</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Of course there were skeptics who said that the Association’s allotments must have been cut, since only that could account for such heroic frugality.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 146-147</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The next thing I knew, all the lights were out, and the telephone, no matter what number I dialed, kept connecting me with an automated recording of the story of Rapunzel. I tried to take the elevator down, but it too was out of order. The students were singing in chorus, shooting their guns in time to the music—in the other direction, I hoped. Such things happen even in the best hotels,&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 154-156</div></div><p>This bit reminds me so much of Douglas Adams. But looking at the publication year, it seems to precede the <em>Hitchhiker&rsquo;s Guide</em>.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The original plan was to have this house of the future be mobile, by means of a powerful propeller, thereby making collective sightseeing excursions possible, but that was ruled out because, first of all, there would be 900 million houses to begin with and, secondly, all travel would be pointless. For even if a house had 1,000 exits and its occupants employed them all, they would never be able to leave the building; by the time the last was out, a whole new generation of occupants would have reached maturity inside. The Japanese were clearly delighted&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 268-272</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;But Professor Dringenbaum went on with his lecture, which was fairly pessimistic in tone, for it maintained that the next phase of our civilization would be cannibalism. He cited several well-known American theoreticians, who had calculated that, if things on Earth continued at their present rate, in four hundred years humanity would represent a living sphere of bodies with a radius expanding at approximately the speed of light. But&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 298-301</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;I turned on this desk unit, taking it for a radio. A swarm of glittering fleas came bursting out, covered me from head to foot, tickling everywhere, all over—until, screaming and waving my arms, I ran out into the hallway. It was an ordinary feely; by accident I had switched it on in the middle of Kitschekov’s Pruriginous Scherzo. I really don’t understand this new, tactual art form. Bil, Symington’s oldest son, told me that there are also obscene compositions. A pornographic, asemantic-asemiotic art, related to music! Ah, how inexhaustible is man’s inventiveness! Symington Jr. has promised to take me to a secret club. An orgy, or what? In any event I won’t touch the food. Or drink anything.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 1031-1036</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;“We owe our liberation to chemistry,” he went on. “For all perception is but a change in the concentration of hydrogen ions on the surface of the brain cells. Seeing me, you actually experience a disturbance in the sodium-potassium equilibrium across your neuron membranes. So all we have to do is send a few well-chosen molecules down into those cortical mitochondria, activate the right neurohumoral-synaptic transmission effector sites, and your fondest dreams come true.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 1171-1174</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Everyone wants to commit a villainy without having to feel like a villain. Revenge provides a good excuse—but what did Joan of Arc ever do to to you? Is her only offense in being brighter, better? Then you are worse, crowbar or no. And that no one desires! We all would like to perpetrate the most despicable, vicious crimes, and yet remain noble throughout, wonderful! Simply magnificent! Who doesn’t want to be magnificent? It’s always that way. The worse they are, the more magnificence. The very impossibility of it whets the appetite. Our client isn’t satisfied with tormenting widows and orphans—he must bask in the glow of his own righteousness besides. A criminal himself (though, mind you, fully justified and exonerated), he has no wish to associate with criminals. But this, so far, is old hat, a tedious commonplace. No, you must give the client nothing less than sainthood, you must make of him a veritable angel, and in such a way, that he gratifies his lusts with the feeling that it is not only permitted, but actually his duty, a sort of sacred trust.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 1188-1196</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;But how can I use a method to discredit that very method, if the method is discreditable?&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 1220-1221</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Hasn’t “Psychomatics” been promoting lately their strata pills, the multilaminars, which produce many-leveled fantasies? Suppose for example you want to be Napoleon at Marengo, but when the fighting is over you’re in no hurry to return to reality, so right there on the battlefield Marshal Ney or one of the Old Guard hands you another pill on a silver tray. It’s part of the hallucination too, but that doesn’t matter, for when you take it the gates to the next dream open before you, and so on ad libitum.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 1257-1260</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;“That word means something different now. A futurologist makes profutes, prognoses, prophecies, while I deal exclusively with theory. This is a completely new field, unknown in our day. You might call it divination through linguistic derivation. Morphological forecasting! Projective etymology!”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 1270-1272</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;“Linguistic futurology investigates the future through the transformational possibilities of the language,” Trottelreiner explained. “I don’t understand.” “A man can control only what he comprehends, and comprehend only what he is able to put into words. The inexpressible therefore is unknowable. By examining future stages in the evolution of language we come to learn what discoveries, changes and social revolutions the language will be capable, some day, of reflecting.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 1274-1278</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;“It isn’t a matter of what I think or don’t think, Tichy. We have simply used futurological linguistics to create a new cosmogony, another theory for future generations to consider. They may or may not take it seriously, but the fact remains that it is possible to articulate such a hypothesis!&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 1316-1318</div></div><p>Such absolutely wonderful bullshit.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;By introducing properly prepared mascons to the brain, one can mask any object in the outside world behind a fictitious image—superimposed—and with such dexterity, that the psychemasconated subject cannot tell which of his perceptions have been altered, and which have not. If but for a single instant you could see this world of ours the way it really is—undoctored, unadulterated, uncensored—you would drop in your tracks!”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 1336-1339</div></div><p>The Matrix copied from Mr. Lem as well, I suppose.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;“This is up’n’at’m, one of the vigilanimides, a powerful countersomniac and antipsychem agent. A derivative of di-methylethylhexabutylpeptopeyotine.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 1341-1342</div></div><p>The red pill.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;There are things, my boy, that everyone knows, and things that no one knows. Pharmacocracy has its open as well as its secret side; the first depends upon the second.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 1381-1382</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;“Come again?” “Psychotroped, hallucinated. Why run nuclear tests if you have fungol gum?”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 1495-1496</div></div><p>This is a vision of a world in which mankind cures all of its ills through pharmacology, fakery, hallucinogens and corruption. War is gone, man&rsquo;s most ecologically corrosive works remain done only in fiction.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;It’s no longer necessary to call out the national guard—all you have to do is sprinkle the right mascon over the troubled area and the populace will see paratrooper units landing, marines charging, tanks—a real tank now costs about a million dollars, while a hallucinated one amounts to less than one-hundredth of a cent per person, or centispecter per spectator. A destroyer costs a dime.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 1500-1502</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;yet there must exist some biological minimum—the bare necessities of life—which no fiction can ever replace. One has to live somewhere, after all, eat something, breathe something. Meanwhile actualysis robs us of one sphere of genuine activity after another.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 1525-1527</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;yet there must exist some biological minimum—the bare necessities of life—which no fiction can ever replace. One has to live somewhere, after all, eat something, breathe something. Meanwhile actualysis robs us of one sphere of genuine activity after another. Besides which we are getting a frightening accumulation of side effects. And these require the use of dehallucinides, supermascons and fixators—with dubious success.” “What are they?” “The dehallucinides? A new series. They create the illusion that there is no illusion. At the present they’re given only to the mentally ill, but the number of people who suspect the authenticity of their surroundings is growing in leaps and bounds. The amnestives can do nothing against sursurmises or doubledoubts. For these are secondary fantasies, in other words twice removed. You don’t understand? Well, say someone imagines that he is only imagining that he doesn’t imagine—or the other way around.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 1525-1531</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;“He says that my restorative, the one you’ve just been using, is not the genuine article. He writes, and I quote, ‘The Federal Bureau of Suggestion, Division of Psychemeering (that’s Psychemengineering), in order to divert the attention of the soothseers from many critical phenomena, is deliberately and maliciously supplying them with false counterhallucinatory agents containing neo-mascons.’” “It doesn’t make sense. The drug you gave me works, I experienced its effects myself. And anyway, what is a soothseer?” “A position of high social standing, which a few—including myself—have the honor and privilege to hold. Soothseeing is the right to take vigilanimides—for the purpose of determining how things are in reality. For someone has to know. That’s obvious, I think?” “Yes.” “And as for the drug, my friend’s guess is that it does indeed cancel out the influence of mascons of earlier vintage, mascons introduced some time ago, but doesn’t stop them all—particularly not the most recent. In which case this”—the Professor held up the flask—“would be no restorative at all, but a most treacherously devised mascon, a counterfeit countermeasure, a double reagent, or in other words a wolf in sheep’s clothing!”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 1548-1557</div></div><p>Here I see echoes of the film <em>They live</em> (or vice versa, since this book predates that film by decades). And isn&rsquo;t this how we are today, but with propaganda and psychological manipulation, rather than direct chemical manipulation? To the point where no one knows what&rsquo;s real anymore unless it&rsquo;s in line of sight?</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Much like the old trick where one would set up easily discovered hiding places for a thief—in the hopes that he’d be satisfied with his first find and not seek out the real, far more cleverly concealed treasure!”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 1560-1562</div></div><p>But how do you, in the end, know that you have come to the end of the rainbow? Every step along the way is a lie. How can you ever be sure that what you see is real? This is really nicely written stuff, with contemporaries in Burroughs, Dick, perhaps even Derrida, etc.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Then, in the next ten years, transcepting would do away with crowds and congestion, the consequence of overpopulation. Channels of interbrain communication, whether by cable or radio, would make pointless all gatherings and get-togethers, excursions and journeys to attend conferences, and therefore all personal locomotion to whatever location, for every living being could avail itself of sensors and scanners situated over the whole expanse of human habitation, even to the farthermost planets.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 1590-1594</div></div><p>For more on this, see the book <em>Diaspora</em> by Greg Egan.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Their job was to see that everyone got his share of aerosol.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 1646-1647</div></div><p>In other words, the Matrix through direct chemistry and no digital component.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;I looked, petrified, at the transformation taking place, realizing in a sudden shudder of premonition that now reality was sloughing off yet another layer—clearly, its falsification had begun so very long ago, that even the most powerful antidote could do no more than tear away successive veils, reaching the veils beneath but not the truth.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 1658-1661</div></div><p>How do you know in which direction it&rsquo;s going? Toward the more or less &ldquo;real&rdquo;? Perhaps we can ask Žižek what he thinks Lacan would say.</p>
      </div>
      </div>
        <div class="footer">
    <div class="footer-data"><div class="footer-links"><ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/contact.php" title="">Contact</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/support.php" title="">Support</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/privacy.php" title="">Privacy</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/rights.php" title="">Rights</a></li></ul></div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="copyright">Copyright (c) 1999-2026 earthli.com. All Rights Reserved.</div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="versions">Powered by <ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore/app_news.php">earthli News 3.7</a></li><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore" title="">earthli WebCore&trade; 3.7</a></li></ul></div></div>    </div>
      </div>
  </div>  </body>
</html>
]]>
  </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
      <title type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[Shift by Hugh Howey (2011; read in 2016)]]>
  </title>
    <id>https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3218</id>
    <link href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3218"/>
    <updated>2016-02-14T16:23:33+01:00</updated>
    <author>
        <name type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[Marco von Ballmoos]]>
  </name>
      <uri>https://earthli.com/users/marco</uri>
    </author>
      <summary type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<blockquote class="quote abstract "><div>Disclaimer: these are notes I took while reading this book. They include citations I found interesting or enlightening or particularly well-written. In some cases, I&rsquo;ve pointed out which of these applies to which citation; in others, I have not. Any benefit you gain from reading these notes is... [<a class="complete-text-link" href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3218">More</a>]</div></blockquote>]]>
  </summary>
      <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<html lang="en">
  <head>
    <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/themes/ice.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/fonts/raleway.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/core/medium.css">
  </head>
  <body>
<div class="style-controls">  <div class="page">
    <div class="page-body">
<div class="info-box-top">
<p>
Published by <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_user.php?name=marco" title="Marco von Ballmoos" class="visible">marco</a> on <span class="date-time">14. Feb 2016 16:23:33 (GMT-5)</span>
</p>
<p>
Updated by <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_user.php?name=marco" title="Marco von Ballmoos" class="visible">marco</a> on <span class="date-time">27. Dec 2020 12:45:40 (GMT-5)</span>
</p>
</div>
      <div class="text-flow wide">
  <blockquote class="quote abstract "><div>Disclaimer: these are notes I took while reading this book. They include citations I found interesting or enlightening or particularly well-written. In some cases, I&rsquo;ve pointed out which of these applies to which citation; in others, I have not. Any benefit you gain from reading these notes is purely incidental to the purpose they serve of reminding me what I once read. Please see Wikipedia for a summary if I&rsquo;ve failed to provide one sufficient for your purposes. If my notes serve to trigger an interest in this book, then I&rsquo;m happy for you.</div></blockquote><p>This is the second book in the Silo series, after <em>Wool</em>. In the first book, we were introduced to the people of the Silo, which we would learn at the very end is Silo 18 of 50. This book runs prior and then parallel to <em>Wool</em>, filling in the detail as to how mankind ended up in silos. It is the story of Donald, a freshman senator and his mentor, Thurman, an experience senator, a war hero and probably the most powerful man in America, president included. It is about 30 years in our future and nanomachines are being used by the rich and powerful to prolong their lives and health. They&rsquo;re also being used by the military. And not just the American military—which is the real problem, right? &lsquo;Cause if only Americans had them, the world would be safe. But I digress.</p>
<p>So anyway, Donald is wrangled into working on a super-secret project as an architect—which is the job he gave up to be a senator. His wife Helen is not super-happy about that, but she&rsquo;s even less happy about Donald possibly working closely with senator Thurman&rsquo;s daughter Anna, who&rsquo;s all kinds of still stuck on Donald from their days in college together. She&rsquo;s also all kinds of manipulative—not quite <em>Glenn Close</em>-in-<em>Fatal Attraction</em> manipulative—but still definite trouble. Of course Donald is a useless lump of XY chromosomes who constantly battles his libido, as expected.</p>
<p>Instead of just waiting for the Iranians to attack America with nanomachines, Thurman arranges for America to attack the entire world as well as itself in order to … get the upper hand? Force a situation that would not have happened if America hadn&rsquo;t done it first? Not sure what the logic is there, but I&rsquo;m almost certain that (A) neither was Thurman and (B) American political thought could easily encompass this solution as the only moral and right thing to do.</p>
<p>So, all that&rsquo;s left of humanity is underground, the world is gone and America—the bits remaining in the 50 underground silos—is totally safe from Iranian nanomachines. Because there is no America left—I guess we showed them. Hoo-ah. Silo 1 is the only one that is aware of any of the other silos and is in charge of shepherding the other silos through the 500 years until the Earth&rsquo;s surface is once again habitable. Silo 1 has women and children, but only in deep-freeze. The silo is run by men who work in 6-month shifts, cryo-sleeping for years to decades in between. Again, nanomachines to the rescue for keeping the bodies healthy. The other silos have a &ldquo;normal&rdquo; mix of men, women and children, population restricted of course to accommodate the reduced living space. See the citations below for more detail.</p>
<p>We learn how, over the centuries, various silos are lost—either going &ldquo;dark&rdquo; mysteriously (silo 40 and others, which are suspected of having gone rogue, despite the best efforts of silo 1 to keep them brainwashed through drugs in the water) or being shut down by silo 1 when the population is deemed incorrigibly unsavable. These are collapsed onto themselves by exploding the outer concrete shell of the silo inward, crushing all inhabitants. An unfortunate but necessary measure as deemed by Silo 1—all things serve the plan, the Pact!</p>
<p>In a separate thread, we learn how Solo—whom Juliette the engineer of Silo 18 met when she traveled to Silo 17 in <em>Wool</em>—grew up and survived 35 years in a silo alone. The book does a pretty good job of filling in detail and getting us right back to where we left the story in <em>Wool</em>. It feels fresh and it&rsquo;s interesting and now we know a lot more about the situation than we did with the relatively tightly focused story in book 1.</p>
<p>At the end of the book, we are back in Silo 18 with Juliette and Lukas. Juliette&rsquo;s plan to dig her way back to Solo and the kids in Silo 17 lies before her. Donald&rsquo;s discovery that there is blue sky and green grass outside of the &ldquo;silo zone&rdquo; also tantalizes us with possibility. Is humanity really gone? Is the world really dead? Are the people suffering through life in the silos for absolutely nothing? Will Silo 1 lose its grip on the others? Was this grip always illusory? Will the madmen who perpetrated this grand waste of human endeavor win or lose? What does that even mean? What about Silo 40 and the other dark ones? Tune in next time for the finale in <em>Dust</em>.</p>
<h2>Citations</h2><p>Here we have Nick talking to his wife Helen about the possibility of the world coming to an end.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;‘What would you do if you thought it all might end?’ he asked his wife. ‘What would you do?’ ‘If what? You mean us? Oh, you mean life. Honey, did someone pass away? Tell me what’s going on.’ ‘No, not someone. Everyone. Everything.’&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 90</div></div><p>I would do nothing. Maybe that&rsquo;s the book that I need to write: about the triumph of those who know there is nothing to save. To counterbalance this endless parade of unquestioning survival at all costs, without a thought as to what is being saved.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Donald was verging on the sad realization that humanity had been thrown to the brink of extinction by insane men in positions of power following one another, each thinking the others knew where they were going.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 238</div></div><p>Jesus, it&rsquo;s about time someone had this thought. As I wrote above, I&rsquo;ve read through most of the Silo series and all of <em>Seveneves</em> and this is the first time someone actually comes out with a thought in the direction of asking whether a race of beings so clearly horrible as mankind is even worth saving. To what end?</p>
<p>Another interesting bit is when they talk about the role of the Crow and the kind of society that works out here, on an entire planet, and inside more confined spaces.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;‘Yes,’ Rodny said. ‘Why do you think we hate our fathers? It’s because she makes us hate them. Gives us ideas to break free from them. But this won’t make it better.’&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 288</div></div><p>Here&rsquo;s where it could get interesting. The people best suited to that world are unquestioning drones. no agitation. no uprising. Smooth sailing. But to what purpose? to pile up millennia? to win? Does that scale to our world as well? Why not? It&rsquo;s just as futile to try to change anything. We are trapped by our animal natures and the animals outnumber us vastly and are so easily swayed by those who bother to grasp for power. What&rsquo;s the point of agitating against those idiots? They will be believed by the masses and carried to power despite your protestations. Why fight over this shitheap? Why stick around? It&rsquo;s hard to come up with a good justification.</p>
<p>The idea that what we consider to be an ideal society on planet Earth, with a predilection for freedom, free choice, etc. is probably not best for survival in much more restricted conditions…it&rsquo;s not necessarily a new one. Many others have made this argument and sought to apply it to general society, arguing that the sheep are to survive and like what they get while their betters organize things for survival. Even in <em>Seveneves</em>, we caught a taste of this in the discussion of the seven Eves as to which genetic characteristics would best serve mankind in space. Certainly not the heroic ones that were useful when there were frontiers to conquer. But if we breed out that which makes us individuals in order to increase survival, what have we actually helped survive? Is it still the same species? Is it still worth saving if it never achieves anything but survival? Or is the pace of advancement more stately and better for all, all around? These are not easy questions.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;He picked up his glass of water, studied it awhile. Or did he know a Cam? Where did he know that name from? There were bits of his past shrouded and hidden from him. There were things like the mark on his neck and the scar on his stomach that he couldn’t remember coming to be. Everyone had their share of these things, parts of their bygone days they couldn’t recall, but Mission more than most. Like his birthday. It drove him crazy that he couldn’t remember when his birthday was. What was so hard about that?&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 292</div></div><p>This is a very nice coda to this section. The conceit being that it would take drugs in the water to make people forget. In point of fact, a well-managed media works just as well.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Donald was reminded how each silo had a mayor for shaking hands and keeping up appearances, just as the world of before had presidents who came and went. Meanwhile, it was the men in the shadows who wielded the true power, those whose terms had no limits. That this silo operated by the same deceit should not be surprising; it was the only way such men knew how to run anything.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 318</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;You and I have spent much of our adult lives scheming to save the world. Several adult lives, in fact. That deed now done, I ponder a different question, one that I fear I cannot answer and that we were never brave nor bold enough to pose. And so I ask you now, dear friend: was this world worth saving to begin with? Were we worth saving? This endeavor was launched with that great assumption taken for granted. Now I ask myself for the first time.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 323</div></div><p>OMG finally Don asks the question outright.</p>
<p>In this next conversation, between Donald, posing as Thurman and in charge of Silo 1, talking to Lukas, the shadow newly in charge of Silo 18, Donald helps the young man confirm his suspicions as to why the remnants of humanity are living in tin cans.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&lsquo;I think it was something we saw coming.’</p>
<p>Donald was impressed. He had a feeling this young man knew the answer and simply wanted confirmation.</p>
<p>‘That’s one possibility,’ he agreed. ‘Consider this …’ He thought how best to phrase it.</p>
<p>‘What if I told you that there were only fifty silos in all the world, and that we are in this infinitely small corner of it?’</p>
<p>On the monitor, Donald could practically watch the young man think, his readings oscillating up and down like the brain’s version of a heartbeat.</p>
<p>‘I would say that we were the only ones …’ A wild spike on the monitor. ‘I’d say we were the only ones who knew.’</p>
<p>‘Very good. And why might that be?’ Donald wished he had the jostling lines on the screen recorded. It was serene, watching another human being clutch after his vanishing sanity, his disappearing doubts.</p>
<p>‘It’s because … It’s not because we knew.’ There was a soft gasp on the other end of the line. ‘It’s because we did it.’</p>
<p>‘Yes,’ Donald said. ‘And now you know.’</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 422</div></div><p>Not only are they living in tin cans, but they&rsquo;re being ruled over by the same men who made living in tin cans the only viable option for survival. Men whose philosophical vision is so limited that they can&rsquo;t envision anything more complex than providing the ability for humans—read: Americans—to continue to draw breath. Who can&rsquo;t imagine that a solution could be worse than the problem.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;His legs were good. Stronger, even, than when he was younger. The hard things got easier the more you did them. It didn’t make it any more fun to do the hard things, though. Solo wished they would just be easy the first time.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 462</div></div><p>That about sums it up, I think.</p>
<h2>Errata</h2><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;[…] unless Drexel had been careless again with which rail he tied it to.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 228</div></div><p>This should be &ldquo;[…] unless Drexel had been careless again <strong class="highlight">to</strong> which rail he<strong class="highlight">&rsquo;d</strong> tied it.&rdquo;</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;[…]limb to limb,[…]&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 239</div></div><p>This should be &ldquo;[…]limb <strong class="highlight">from</strong> limb,[…]&rdquo;.</p>
      </div>
      </div>
        <div class="footer">
    <div class="footer-data"><div class="footer-links"><ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/contact.php" title="">Contact</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/support.php" title="">Support</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/privacy.php" title="">Privacy</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/rights.php" title="">Rights</a></li></ul></div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="copyright">Copyright (c) 1999-2026 earthli.com. All Rights Reserved.</div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="versions">Powered by <ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore/app_news.php">earthli News 3.7</a></li><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore" title="">earthli WebCore&trade; 3.7</a></li></ul></div></div>    </div>
      </div>
  </div>  </body>
</html>
]]>
  </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
      <title type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[And Another Thing... (Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy Book 6) by Eoin Colfer (read in 2015)]]>
  </title>
    <id>https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3151</id>
    <link href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3151"/>
    <updated>2016-02-09T22:49:04+01:00</updated>
    <author>
        <name type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[Marco von Ballmoos]]>
  </name>
      <uri>https://earthli.com/users/marco</uri>
    </author>
      <summary type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<blockquote class="quote abstract "><div>Disclaimer: these are notes I took while reading this book. They include citations I found interesting or enlightening or particularly well-written. In some cases, I&rsquo;ve pointed out which of these applies to which citation; in others, I have not. Any benefit you gain from reading these notes is... [<a class="complete-text-link" href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3151">More</a>]</div></blockquote>]]>
  </summary>
      <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<html lang="en">
  <head>
    <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/themes/ice.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/fonts/raleway.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/core/medium.css">
  </head>
  <body>
<div class="style-controls">  <div class="page">
    <div class="page-body">
<div class="info-box-top">
<p>
Published by <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_user.php?name=marco" title="Marco von Ballmoos" class="visible">marco</a> on <span class="date-time">9. Feb 2016 22:49:04 (GMT-5)</span>
</p>
</div>
      <div class="text-flow wide">
  <blockquote class="quote abstract "><div>Disclaimer: these are notes I took while reading this book. They include citations I found interesting or enlightening or particularly well-written. In some cases, I&rsquo;ve pointed out which of these applies to which citation; in others, I have not. Any benefit you gain from reading these notes is purely incidental to the purpose they serve of reminding me what I once read. Please see Wikipedia for a summary if I&rsquo;ve failed to provide one sufficient for your purposes. If my notes serve to trigger an interest in this book, then I&rsquo;m happy for you.</div></blockquote><p><br>
This is the sixth in the increasingly inaccurately named trilogy, the <em>Hitchhiker&rsquo;s Guide to the Galaxy</em>. This installment picks up where Adams left off in <em>Mostly Harmless</em> and reads a bit like Pratchett&rsquo;s <em>Raising Steam</em> in that absolutely everyone from the respective pantheon appears. The good news is that it&rsquo;s a pretty good story and the characters are handled well and feel natural. The dialogue is clever and the writing is funny. Good old Wowbagger the Infinitely Prolonged features prominently as well as the always interesting Trillian and Tricia McMillan. A planet built by the Magrathean Slartibartfast has been populated by people far too rich for their own good and they&rsquo;re petitioning for a God to rule their planet for them. Wowbagger and Thor both show up and lock horns. Even the Vogons, led by the implacable Prostetnic Jeltz and his son, who&rsquo;s not as enthusiastic as his father about eliminating humanity forever (finally closing the chapter on every possible extrusion in every possible multiverse). A fun romp and an installment that can stand proudly next to the others.</p>
<h2>Citations</h2><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;“Bugger,” muttered the old man as the final crumbs dissipated on his fingertips, then he sat back on a cushion in the room of sky that suddenly surrounded him. Someone would be coming soon, he was sure of it. From the dim caverns of his old memories, the names Ford and Prefect emerged like gray bats to associate themselves with the impending disaster.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 7</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The Cyphroles are tiny invertebrate free-swimming gastrozoa who absorb the hostile energy emitted by their predators and use it to power their own systems. This makes the predator angry and so the Cyphroles swim faster through the gas ocean. Sesefras Magna gas dragons have learned to approach the Cyphroles casually, whistling a little tune or pretending to search for a few coins they have mislaid. The Cyphroles always fall for these tricks, as nature gave them large energy filters and tiny bullshit detectors.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 23</div></div><p>This is a nice callback. It&rsquo;s one of the nicest lines from the original. [1]</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;“Humans think digital watches are pretty neat,” Ford murmured absently, then turned to face the three humans, who were busy doing their utmost to avoid being the least bit civil to each other.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 26</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Trillian actually wrung her fingers as the exchange escalated. She was so far in the red as regards good parenting credits that she had no idea where the high moral ground was. Even if she could occasionally glimpse it as a myopic hiker glimpses a mist-sodden hill at night, she had no idea who currently occupied it or how to scale its slopes, should she accidentally bump into them.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 117</div></div><p>Mr. Colfer is pulling the best lines from other works now. This one is from <em>Blade Runner</em>, delivered by the incomparable Rutger Hauer.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Wowbagger could not hold her eyes. “I’ve seen things you people wouldn’t believe. Attack ships on fire off the shoulder of Orion. I watched C-beams glitter in the dark near the Tannhäuser Gate. All those moments will be lost in time, like tears in rain.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 122</div></div><p>And this is a nice citation illustrating Colfer&rsquo;s affinity and feel for the characters, Zaphod in this instance.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Hillman drummed his fingers on the table, something he hoped the waitress would notice and for God’s sake come and take his order. He stopped in mid-drum. “Well, we have no waitresses for a start. They’re all down on the beach colony with the personal trainers. And they took all the booze.” Zaphod reached for his boots. “Well, it’s been great chatting to you, Hillman. If you could just point me in the direction of this beach colony.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 183</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;“Every new society has teething problems. You need to work through them with diplomacy and alcohol.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 183</div></div><p>And again, this time with Ford and Arthur. And, at the end, a callback to good old Marvin, who uttered the original line <span class="quote-inline">&ldquo;Life? Don&rsquo;t talk to me about life.&rdquo;</span></p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;“I guess X marks the spot,” said Ford, a hank of charred meat in his hand. He turned to the nearest cow. “Do you have any sauce? This is a little dry.” Arthur found that he was not as scandalized by this sort of behavior as he once had been. Repeated exposure to Ford Prefect’s rampant gourmandizing had eroded some of his behavioral notions. “I believe that someone mentioned wine,” he said, trying not to sound overly enthusiastic. Random scowled, although no one noticed as it was one of her two normal expressions, the other being a contemptuous curl of the lip. “That is disgusting,” she said, transitioning smoothly into expression number two. “You two are pigs.” “Pigs,” said the cow. “Don’t talk to me about pigs.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 192</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;“Wasn’t it? I seem to recall you being linked to several starlets.” “That was just physical. Those females meant nothing to me.” This is historically the third worst thing to say to a female of any species. “They meant nothing? Why not?” Wowbagger spread his arms. “How could they? Even as we mated, they were growing old.” There’s number two. Trillian’s eyes flashed. “Growing old. We all grow old, Bowerick. Believe it or not, I’m growing old too.” Wowbagger realized that his lack of intimate communication over the years was doing wonders to increase his chances of dying alone in the very immediate future. “You may be growing old,” he said desperately, “but you have years left before you’re too old to reproduce.” And there’s number one. Badabingo. Green stick in the green hole.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 196</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Hyperspace cleared its throat and hawked out a Vogon bureaucruiser into the clear swath of satin space .01 parsecs beyond Nano’s thermosphere. Inside the Business End, three thousand members of the Bureaucratic Corps flopped out of their hypercradles and rubbed the belt dimples from their tummies.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 219</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;If you worked on the outside, as a panel scraper or engine plunger, then it was possible to be driven blind or even mad by its sheer symmetrophobia. Most craft give a nod, however brief and unfriendly, toward beauty. Vogon ships did not nod toward beauty. They pulled on ski masks and mugged beauty in a dark alley. They spat in the eye of beauty and bludgeoned their way through the notions of aesthetics and aerodynamics. Vogon cruisers did not so much travel through space as defile it and toss it aside.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 225</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Ford appeared on the opposite side of the square and barged through the thrumming crowds, making good use of his sharp elbows. As he drew closer, Arthur recognized the look on his friend’s face. “I don’t believe it,” he said, hurling his ice cream to the ground. “Daddy!” said Random, shocked. “There’s a recycler just there.” Arthur was unrepentant. He stood and stamped on the carton. “It doesn’t matter because I have a feeling this planet is about to be destroyed. Isn’t that right, Ford?” Ford arrived huffing. He was a journalist and unaccustomed to physical exercise.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 231</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;“Okay, Ford,” he said urgently. “What should we do?” The question seemed to puzzle the Betelgeusean. “Do?” “About the Vogons. How do we survive?” “Oh. Yes. That’s what I came here to tell you. Did you see me crossing the square? I was all charged up. Didn’t care who I knocked over.” “We saw you. Now, what do we do? Can we hitch?” Ford laughed. “Are you kidding? The Vogons won’t fall for that again. Even their shields have shields.” “So what then?” “We need to run, quite quickly, to the spaceport. There might still be time to board the Heart of Gold.” “I see something,” said Random, pointing skyward at what looked like a cluster of shooting stars heading their way, descending in synchronized loops through the atmosphere. “Or not,” said Ford. He plucked Random’s ice cream from her fist and licked it slowly, savoring every drop.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 232</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;“So you actually thought your one client was dead?” “Of course not. You can’t kill a god. Even that guy who drove into the white hole is still alive, even if his parts are spread across several dimensions.” “What about that special bomb?” Zaphod snorted. “The QUEST? Who do you think sold that to the Vogons? I’m surprised it didn’t fall out of the sky. I put a lawnmower engine on that thing.” Left Brain was quiet for a moment, except for the clicking of spider-bots gathering condensation on the inner curve of his orb.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 263</div></div><p><hr></p>
<div class="footnote-reference"><span id="footnote_DRAFTABLE_ENTRY_3151_1_body" class="footnote-number">[1]</span> <blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Far out in the uncharted backwaters of the unfashionable end of the western spiral arm of the galaxy lies a small, unregarded yellow sun. Orbiting this at a distance of roughly 92 million miles is an utterly insignificant little blue-green planet whose ape-descended life forms are so amazingly primitive that they still think digital watches are a pretty neat idea.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div>      </div>
      </div>
        <div class="footer">
    <div class="footer-data"><div class="footer-links"><ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/contact.php" title="">Contact</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/support.php" title="">Support</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/privacy.php" title="">Privacy</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/rights.php" title="">Rights</a></li></ul></div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="copyright">Copyright (c) 1999-2026 earthli.com. All Rights Reserved.</div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="versions">Powered by <ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore/app_news.php">earthli News 3.7</a></li><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore" title="">earthli WebCore&trade; 3.7</a></li></ul></div></div>    </div>
      </div>
  </div>  </body>
</html>
]]>
  </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
      <title type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[Blindness by José Saramago (read in 2015)]]>
  </title>
    <id>https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3200</id>
    <link href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3200"/>
    <updated>2016-02-08T22:41:48+01:00</updated>
    <author>
        <name type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[Marco von Ballmoos]]>
  </name>
      <uri>https://earthli.com/users/marco</uri>
    </author>
      <summary type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<blockquote class="quote abstract "><div>Disclaimer: these are notes I took while reading this book. They include citations I found interesting or enlightening or particularly well-written. In some cases, I&rsquo;ve pointed out which of these applies to which citation; in others, I have not. Any benefit you gain from reading these notes is... [<a class="complete-text-link" href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3200">More</a>]</div></blockquote>]]>
  </summary>
      <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<html lang="en">
  <head>
    <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/themes/ice.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/fonts/raleway.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/core/medium.css">
  </head>
  <body>
<div class="style-controls">  <div class="page">
    <div class="page-body">
<div class="info-box-top">
<p>
Published by <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_user.php?name=marco" title="Marco von Ballmoos" class="visible">marco</a> on <span class="date-time">8. Feb 2016 22:41:48 (GMT-5)</span>
</p>
<p>
Updated by <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_user.php?name=marco" title="Marco von Ballmoos" class="visible">marco</a> on <span class="date-time">8. Feb 2016 22:59:00 (GMT-5)</span>
</p>
</div>
      <div class="text-flow wide">
  <blockquote class="quote abstract "><div>Disclaimer: these are notes I took while reading this book. They include citations I found interesting or enlightening or particularly well-written. In some cases, I&rsquo;ve pointed out which of these applies to which citation; in others, I have not. Any benefit you gain from reading these notes is purely incidental to the purpose they serve of reminding me what I once read. Please see Wikipedia for a summary if I&rsquo;ve failed to provide one sufficient for your purposes. If my notes serve to trigger an interest in this book, then I&rsquo;m happy for you.</div></blockquote><p>The story is of a man who is suddenly struck blind, seeing only a wash of milky whiteness. Others soon follow, as it becomes clear that the blindness is caused by a communicable disease.</p>
<p>Soon enough, everyone has it and the city is filled only with the blind, All, save one lady—the doctor&rsquo;s wife, played by <em>Julianne Moore</em>—who is unaffected by the blindness, but not by its horrific effects (she lives in a world of blind people). The effects are as you can imagine, if you were to think about it: a city filled only with the newly blind, fumbling about, looking for food, looking for shelter, for a place to urinate or defecate. Before everyone has succumbed, the government ruthlessly quarantines the initial afflicted in a mental asylum. Food is delivered sporadically but relatively regularly. The place becomes nearly unbearably filthy.</p>
<p>As more and more people arrive, an element finally arrives that understands that societal rules no longer apply. They take all the food for themselves, rationing it out to the others in exchange for the last of their worldly possessions. When those run out, they naturally demand that the other wards send their women. After several days, the women volunteer for this horrific duty, even the doctor&rsquo;s wife. Afterwards, though, she&rsquo;s had enough and takes a pair of scissors she found to kill the ringleader, threatening the remaining pirates that she will kill more if they don&rsquo;t give up. Another woman, traumatized by the rapes, finds a lighter and sets the pirates&rsquo; den on fire, taking them all out. </p>
<p>At the same time, the doctor&rsquo;s wife takes her small group outside to ask the soldiers for help. They are gone. There is no authority remaining. All is chaos and anarchy, with only the blind to fill the power vacuum. The small group escapes back to the city, the doctor&rsquo;s wife the only witness to the utter horror of the place, overrun by people who can no longer take care of themselves. They survive better than most, with the doctor&rsquo;s wife&rsquo;s sight helping them find food that others have missed. They return to the doctor&rsquo;s home and settle in for a somewhat better existence than they had in quarantine, but one still bereft of true hope. And then, just as quickly as it left, their sight returns. The end.</p>
<p>This is a decent enough book, written in a flowing style that is nearly punctuation- and paragraph-free. I enjoyed the concept more than the writing style. Considering some of the implications—the filth of a blind world—was pretty horrifying. It became clear that, while the blind can survive well in a world peopled by the non-blind, a world where everyone is blind quickly becomes unlivable and likely unsurvivable. How do you farm? How do you protect yourself from the elements? How do you construct shelter? And so on.</p>
<h2>Citations</h2><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;These observations of a psychological nature, whose subtlety has no apparent relevance considering the extraordinary scale of the cataclysm which our narrative is struggling to relate, only serve to explain why all the blind internees were awake so early, some, as was said at the outset, were roused by the churning of their empty stomachs in need of food, others were dragged from their sleep by the nervous impatience of the early risers, who did not hesitate to make more noise than the inevitable and tolerable when people cohabit in barracks and wards.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 94</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;I suppose we’ll all be contaminated, there cannot be a single person who has not been within sight of a blind man, If a blind man cannot see, I ask myself, how can he transmit this disease through his sight, General, this must be the most logical illness in the world, the eye that is blind transmits the blindness to the eye that sees, what could be simpler, We have a colonel here who believes the solution would be to shoot the blind as soon as they appear, Corpses instead of blind men would scarcely improve the situation, To be blind is not the same as being dead, Yes, but to be dead is to be blind, So there are going to be about two hundred of them, Yes, And what shall we do with the taxi-drivers, Put them inside as well. That same day, in the late afternoon, the Ministry of Defence contacted the Ministry of Health, Would you like to hear the latest news, that colonel we mentioned earlier has gone blind, It’ll be interesting to see what he thinks of that bright idea of his now, He already thought, he shot himself in the head, Now that’s what I call a consistent attitude, The army is always ready to set an example.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 107</div></div>      </div>
      </div>
        <div class="footer">
    <div class="footer-data"><div class="footer-links"><ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/contact.php" title="">Contact</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/support.php" title="">Support</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/privacy.php" title="">Privacy</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/rights.php" title="">Rights</a></li></ul></div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="copyright">Copyright (c) 1999-2026 earthli.com. All Rights Reserved.</div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="versions">Powered by <ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore/app_news.php">earthli News 3.7</a></li><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore" title="">earthli WebCore&trade; 3.7</a></li></ul></div></div>    </div>
      </div>
  </div>  </body>
</html>
]]>
  </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
      <title type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[Joyland by Stephen King (read in 2015)]]>
  </title>
    <id>https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3149</id>
    <link href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3149"/>
    <updated>2016-02-08T22:35:53+01:00</updated>
    <author>
        <name type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[Marco von Ballmoos]]>
  </name>
      <uri>https://earthli.com/users/marco</uri>
    </author>
      <summary type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<blockquote class="quote abstract "><div>Disclaimer: these are notes I took while reading this book. They include citations I found interesting or enlightening or particularly well-written. In some cases, I&rsquo;ve pointed out which of these applies to which citation; in others, I have not. Any benefit you gain from reading these notes is... [<a class="complete-text-link" href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3149">More</a>]</div></blockquote>]]>
  </summary>
      <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<html lang="en">
  <head>
    <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/themes/ice.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/fonts/raleway.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/core/medium.css">
  </head>
  <body>
<div class="style-controls">  <div class="page">
    <div class="page-body">
<div class="info-box-top">
<p>
Published by <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_user.php?name=marco" title="Marco von Ballmoos" class="visible">marco</a> on <span class="date-time">8. Feb 2016 22:35:53 (GMT-5)</span>
</p>
<p>
Updated by <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_user.php?name=marco" title="Marco von Ballmoos" class="visible">marco</a> on <span class="date-time">8. Feb 2016 22:36:03 (GMT-5)</span>
</p>
</div>
      <div class="text-flow wide">
  <blockquote class="quote abstract "><div>Disclaimer: these are notes I took while reading this book. They include citations I found interesting or enlightening or particularly well-written. In some cases, I&rsquo;ve pointed out which of these applies to which citation; in others, I have not. Any benefit you gain from reading these notes is purely incidental to the purpose they serve of reminding me what I once read. Please see Wikipedia for a summary if I&rsquo;ve failed to provide one sufficient for your purposes. If my notes serve to trigger an interest in this book, then I&rsquo;m happy for you.</div></blockquote><p>You can tell this is a Stephen King book from a mile away. It&rsquo;s about a young man—Devin, a writer—who&rsquo;s been jilted by the love of his life. She&rsquo;s decided that it&rsquo;s time to see other people and he&rsquo;s not quite on board with that yet. So he takes a job several states away and spends a good deal of time mooning around over her. </p>
<p>He makes a couple of good friends at this odd little amusement park called Joyland. They have a dog mascot that he&rsquo;s especially good at playing. After learning of a ghost in the haunted-house ride, Devin becomes nearly obsessed with the case and is convinced that he can release the ghost if he just finds the real killer.</p>
<p>Along the way, he befriends a standoffish woman, Annie, through her son Mike, who&rsquo;s physically disabled but gifted in other ways. He is crucial to releasing the ghost because of his psychic powers. They finally discover the real killer hiding right under their noses. They all learn a lot about life, go their separate ways and nobody really lives happily ever after, but that&rsquo;s OK too.</p>
<h2>Citations</h2><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;This is a badly broken world, full of wars and cruelty and senseless tragedy. Every human being who inhabits it is served his or her portion of unhappiness and wakeful nights. Those of you who don’t already know that will come to know it. Given such sad but undeniable facts of the human condition, you have been given a priceless gift this summer: you are here to sell fun. In exchange for the hard-earned dollars of your customers, you will parcel out happiness. Children will go home and dream of what they saw here and what they did here. I hope you will remember that when the work is hard, as it sometimes will be, or when people are rude, as they often will be, or when you feel your best efforts have gone unappreciated. This is a different world, one that has its own customs and its own language, which we simply call the Talk. You’ll begin learning it today. As you learn to talk the Talk, you’ll learn to walk the walk. I’m not going to explain that, because it can’t be explained; it can only be learned.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 760–767</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;What’s carny-from-carny mean?” “Means you’re like old man Easterbrook. His father worked the carny circuit back in the Dust Bowl days, and his grandfather worked it back when they had a fake Indian show featuring Big Chief Yowlatcha.” “You got to be kidding!” Tom exclaimed, almost exultantly. Pop gave him a cool stare that settled Tom down—a thing not always easy to do. “Son, do you know what history is?” “Uh…stuff that happened in the past?” “Nope,” he said, tying on his canvas change-belt. “History is the collective and ancestral shit of the human race, a great big and ever-growin pile of crap. Right now we’re standin at the top of it, but pretty soon we’ll be buried under the doodoo of generations yet to come. That’s why your folks’ clothes look so funny in old photographs, to name but a single example. And, as someone who’s destined to be buried beneath the shit of your children and grandchildren, I think you should be just a leetle more forgiving.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Location 825–834</div></div>      </div>
      </div>
        <div class="footer">
    <div class="footer-data"><div class="footer-links"><ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/contact.php" title="">Contact</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/support.php" title="">Support</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/privacy.php" title="">Privacy</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/rights.php" title="">Rights</a></li></ul></div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="copyright">Copyright (c) 1999-2026 earthli.com. All Rights Reserved.</div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="versions">Powered by <ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore/app_news.php">earthli News 3.7</a></li><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore" title="">earthli WebCore&trade; 3.7</a></li></ul></div></div>    </div>
      </div>
  </div>  </body>
</html>
]]>
  </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
      <title type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[Seveneves: A Novel by Neal Stephenson (read in 2016)]]>
  </title>
    <id>https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3213</id>
    <link href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3213"/>
    <updated>2016-02-02T22:08:48+01:00</updated>
    <author>
        <name type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[Marco von Ballmoos]]>
  </name>
      <uri>https://earthli.com/users/marco</uri>
    </author>
      <summary type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<blockquote class="quote abstract "><div>Disclaimer: these are notes I took while reading this book. They include citations I found interesting or enlightening or particularly well-written. In some cases, I&rsquo;ve pointed out which of these applies to which citation; in others, I have not. Any benefit you gain from reading these notes is... [<a class="complete-text-link" href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3213">More</a>]</div></blockquote>]]>
  </summary>
      <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<html lang="en">
  <head>
    <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/themes/ice.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/fonts/raleway.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/core/medium.css">
  </head>
  <body>
<div class="style-controls">  <div class="page">
    <div class="page-body">
<div class="info-box-top">
<p>
Published by <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_user.php?name=marco" title="Marco von Ballmoos" class="visible">marco</a> on <span class="date-time">2. Feb 2016 22:08:48 (GMT-5)</span>
</p>
<p>
Updated by <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_user.php?name=marco" title="Marco von Ballmoos" class="visible">marco</a> on <span class="date-time">30. Jul 2017 18:12:11 (GMT-5)</span>
</p>
</div>
      <div class="text-flow wide">
  <blockquote class="quote abstract "><div>Disclaimer: these are notes I took while reading this book. They include citations I found interesting or enlightening or particularly well-written. In some cases, I&rsquo;ve pointed out which of these applies to which citation; in others, I have not. Any benefit you gain from reading these notes is purely incidental to the purpose they serve of reminding me what I once read. Please see Wikipedia for a summary if I&rsquo;ve failed to provide one sufficient for your purposes. If my notes serve to trigger an interest in this book, then I&rsquo;m happy for you.</div></blockquote><p>This is another epic work [1] by Stephenson, spanning almost 900 pages and over 5000 years. He picks up some themes I&rsquo;ve seen in other books and also includes a lot of his standard fascination for technological detail, weaponry in particular. This is the story of the eradication of life as we know it on the planet Earth. Something called The Agent enters the Moon from one side and exits from the other, shattering it into seven large pieces and innumerable smaller ones. The Agent is a deus ex machina—at least for this first novel [2]—and we cease thinking about its origins almost immediately to focus on the problems engendered by splitting the Moon.</p>
<p>After an initial, short period of thinking that everything&rsquo;s going to be OK, Dr. Doob and other scientists around the world discover that the shards of the Moon will continue to slam into each other until they trigger a chain reaction of sorts that they call The Hard Rain. The White Sky will soon follow, ensuing from the Hard Rain setting the Earth&rsquo;s entire atmosphere on fire. It&rsquo;s time to scramble to save humanity, no questions asked. All issues of whether humanity is worth saving are left by the wayside without a single discussion. A pity. [3]</p>
<p>The people currently on the ISS, to which an asteroid named Amalthea has in the meantime become attached, are informed that they will never return home. Instead, they are to prepare for an influx of settlers and colonists and materials rocketed up from Earth over the course of the two years that it is predicted to take for the Hard Rain to begin in earnest. Ivy (commander) and Dinah (roboticist and asteroid-miner) are friends on said station. Dinah&rsquo;s father, Rufus, is a miner and decides to bury himself and his family in the bowels of Alaska and wait out the 5,000–10,000 years of the Hard Rain there. [4]</p>
<p>The combined genius of Earth comes up with a plan to extend the ISS to accommodate more inhabitants: the Cloud Ark. The Cloud Ark is a distributed system of pods, each of which should be as self-sufficient as possible. Why that? Because the orbit of the ISS is now filled with the chunks of the moon—bolides—that will create the Hard Rain. They also cause major problems for Izzy, as the ISS is soon christened.</p>
<p>Though Earth can send centuries&rsquo; worth of supplies—&rdquo;vitamins&rdquo; in the parlance of space—that are small and difficult to re-create in orbit, where they have little to no industrial capacity, and Izzy has a lot of raw materials from Amalthea (the already-captured asteroid), they have nowhere near the amount of volatiles that they&rsquo;ll need for decades worth of propulsion while they dodge and weave their way through the Hard Rain.</p>
<p>Cue <em>lots</em> of orbital mechanics here. Some people in government know this, but pretend that it&rsquo;s not a problem in order to give people on the planet hope that humanity will survive the Hard Rain in orbit. At any rate, Sean Probst, the president of the mining company for which Dinah actually works and giver of zero fucks about diplomatically coddling humanity&rsquo;s dying hopes [5], shoots himself into orbit to address this situation. He will (almost) single-handedly pilot a ship beyond Earth&rsquo;s farthest LaGrange point in order to capture a comet, Ymir. This mission will take about two years, which coincides with the last contact with the surface of the Earth, give or take.</p>
<p>During these two years, Izzy must be expanded considerably and with a considerably narrower safety margin than previously allowed. The first wave of construction workers comprises only Russians, and includes Tekla, a former Olympian and all-around bad-ass, who&rsquo;s saved from her malfunctioning self-contained habitat by Dinah and her robots. The architect for all of these habitats is <br>
Rhys Aitken, a guy who&rsquo;s fascinated by the power of chains, especially in space. This will factor in heavily 5000 years from now.</p>
<p>The remaining governments on Earth try to make it an orderly emigration by choosing the people who will go by lottery or other means. Eventually, the Hard Rain comes, the President of the U.S., Julia (JBH)—against all treaties that forbade premiers from saving themselves—arrives at Izzy and causes no end of her trouble with her endlessly flapping mouth, the power of which is consistently and nearly unbelievably underestimated by the technocrats and astronauts. Camila, a young Muslim girl in love with Julia&rsquo;s charisma, gloms onto her immediately.</p>
<p>The leadership of Izzy passes from Ivy to Markus Leuker, a bad-ass and hugely pragmatic Swiss pilot who Dinah starts sleeping with right away. When Ymir comes back into range—and Dinah&rsquo;s been communicating with him by Morse Code because his radio&rsquo;s out—they realize that they have to make a mission to Ymir in order to bring it in and dock it—because everyone on Ymir died on the mission and Sean expired from cancer after he got it on its final approach. [6]</p>
<p>They take a MRV to Ymir with Dinah, Markus, a Japanese guy and a Russian, Slava aboard as crew. They bring Ymir to Izzy, but only Dinah survives the trip, but the others all die heroically and performing sensible and necessary duties. All the while, Julia is agitating among the Arkie Community (which she immediately christens the AC) and gets them to break off from Izzy with a bunch of supplies and Arks in a two-pronged effort: (1) send some of them to Mars and (2) move some of them away from the centralized power of Izzy, claiming that they want to increase safety by distribution. In order to do this, they fuck up the bolide-detection system, the Parambulator, so no-one can react when the biggest bolide they&rsquo;ve yet seen smashes into Izzy, disabling a bunch of it and tearing out 97% of the Human Genetic Archive, which was total bullshit anyway, at least according to the chief geneticist, Moira.</p>
<p>The Arks leave, Izzy repairs itself with the remnants of Ymir and we never hear from the Mars mission again. We join Izzy three years later as she&rsquo;s about to dock with the Cleft, one of the largest remaining bits of the Moon, having made the Big Ride out of Earth&rsquo;s more dangerous and by-now ringed orbits. Most of the crew has died from cancer or suicide or accidents and there are only 30 people left aboard, among them Ivy, Dinah, Doc, Tekla, Moira,  and Camila.</p>
<p>Though Izzy has been trading sporadically with the Ark Swarm, they haven&rsquo;t heard from them in a while and have no idea in what shape they&rsquo;re actually in. At the same time as they are about to match speed with the remains of Moon and head for Cleft, the Ark Swarm contacts them and  asks for assistance. Insanely and stupidly—but importantly for the story—they agree to prepare for docking if the Swarm can get themselves to where Izzy is.</p>
<p>The captain of the Swarm Aïda tells them that she has only 11 survivors on board (of the nearly 1000 that left). They have resorted to cannibalism because they can&rsquo;t grow food anymore. Julia survives but is no longer in power—we discover later that Aïda had a giant metal post put through her tongue, for which you can&rsquo;t really blame her at all. Aïda is the most human of them all and just wants to survive at all costs—and also be in charge—so she plans a coup when the Swarm arrives.</p>
<p>The crew of Izzy, perhaps from exhaustion or the same naïveté that led them to <em>not</em> throw Julia out the airlock as soon as she arrived, only discovers this plot late in the game and suffers even more losses, but eventually defeats and captures Aïda. They reach the Cleft, Doc walks on the surface and then peacefully dies of cancer, leaving only 8 surviving women: Aïda, Julia, Camila, Moira, Ivy, Dinah, Tekla and the psychologist Luisa, who has passed menopause. They come to terms with one another and the &ldquo;Seven Eves&rdquo; re-found the human race.</p>
<p>Fast-forward 5000 years and humanity is, once again, 3 billion strong. All but a million or so are in a giant ring of habitats around the Earth: the Belt. Each of the Eves has spawned her own and genetically distinct race. The Julians and Aïdans are together known as &ldquo;Red&rdquo; and the Teklans, Ivyns, Dinans, Moirans and Camites have banded together to form &ldquo;Blue&rdquo;. The history of the last 5000 years is sketched in, but the book mostly concerns itself with the wonderful things they&rsquo;ve invented.</p>
<p>We join Kath Two as she glides up from the newly habitable surface of the Earth, which the Spacers have rehabilitated by dropping comets on it after the Hard Rain was over. This trip is described in incredible detail—almost enough for you to be able to build your own self-propelled and space-capable glider. The Spacers have reintroduced species and the larger predators have just come back—all resurrected from the remains of the genetic imprints stored in Moira&rsquo;s USB sticks.</p>
<p>Kath Two is soon embroiled in a secretive mission with six others—the members of a so-called &ldquo;Seven&rdquo;—one representative of each race. The Dinan is Tyuratam Lake, the proprietor of a fancy throwback of a bar in the Cradle, which is a gigantic habitat located on what&rsquo;s left of Cleft. The Cradle sits at the end of a giant arm whose other end is counterweighted way out in space by a giant boulder. The Cradle can be let down anywhere on the equator to dock with the planet. The Ivyn is Doc, an ancient scientist, the Camite is Memmie, his assistant. The Teklan is Beled Tomov, the Aïdan is a Neander named Langobard and the Julian is named Ariane Casablancova.</p>
<p>We learn about the different races, their different alliances, predilections and history. The Seven descend to the planet and quickly run into the Diggers, the survivors of Rufus Wainwright&rsquo;s bunker in Alaska (yes, they survived). They are represented by Sonar Taxlaw, a living encyclopedia named after the volume for which she is primarily responsible. This is what the Seven&rsquo;s mission was (only Doc knew): to determine whether there were other survivors and to make contact.</p>
<p>The contact goes horribly awry, as Ariane—again, typically and not surprisingly—betrays everyone to bring the prize—a digger woman—home to the part of the belt controlled by Red. Blue, having botched the first contact with the Diggers, sets its sights on contacting the Pingers first. The Pingers are sub-oceanic survivors of humanity who lives in gigantic submerged habitats built in Earth&rsquo;s deepest trenches.</p>
<p>These are the survivors of Cal Blankenship, Ivy&rsquo;s former fiancé, who was commander of U.S. navy submarine and presumably survived the Hard Rain. They use one of his last pictures to communicate with the Pinger emissary, who&rsquo;s physiognomy is considerably changed and whose sonic communication is considerably altered.</p>
<p>In the meantime, Red makes nice with the Diggers, who are overawed by Red&rsquo;s fine grasp of public relations and marketing and <em>managing of the story</em> (all thanks to the Julians and the special subrace of Aïdans called Aretaics, who are well-versed in persuasion/bullshit). Red had already bungled <em>their</em> first contact with the Pingers by building their gigantic answer to the Cradle, called Gnomon, which is utterly gigantic and, unlike the Cradle, can swing north and south of the equator to the land-based locations available on the slice of the surface of the Earth to which Red has access.</p>
<p>And there we leave humanity: Izzy managed to save humanity and offer a wellspring from which to grow again, Earth is habitable again, the Diggers survived, as did the Pingers. No-one knows about the Mars expedition (or at least nothing was said). They are presumably dead, as 99% of the Ark Swarm was. At the very end, we discover that there are currents and powers in Humanity—both Red and Blue—very interested in finding out who sent the Agent.</p>
<h2>Citations</h2><p>The following section exhibits, for me, the classic Neal Stephenson style, in which a relatively long and well-written sentence sums up the three proposed solutions for escaping the worst of the Hard Rain in orbit—the &ldquo;ocean liner&rdquo;, the &ldquo;blind ox&rdquo; and the &ldquo;football player pushing a wheelbarrow&rdquo;. I left off the two preceding pages of detail for brevity, but just liked the way he expressed the chaotic and for-man nearly unpredictable complexity of picking the best solution.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Which of these analogies was closer to the truth boiled down to a statistical argument in which were braided together assumptions about the range and distribution of bolide sizes, the amount of variation in their trajectories, how well the long-range radars worked, and how good the algorithms were at sorting out all the different bogeys and deciding which ones were dangerous. Somewhere in the middle, between the ocean liner and the blind ox, was the football player pushing the wheelbarrow. It didn’t matter&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 253</div></div><p>This next bit describes an uplifting moment during the begin of the Hard Rain, when people still survived, resigned to their fates. People of musical bent, members of orchestras organized themselves to be playing on the deck of the Titanic, as it were.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;After sampling all of them she locked her radio dial on Notre Dame, where they were holding the Vigil for the End of the World and would continue doing so until the cathedral fell down in ruins upon the performers’ heads and extinguished all life in the remains of the building. She couldn’t watch it, since video bandwidth was scarce, but she could imagine it well: the Orchestre Philharmonique de Radio France, its ranks swollen by the most prestigious musicians of the Francophone world, all dressed in white tie and tails, ball gowns and tiaras, performing in shifts around the clock, playing a few secular classics but emphasizing the sacred repertoire: masses and requiems. The music was marred by the occasional thud, which she took to be the sonic booms of incoming bolides. In most cases the musicians played right through. Sometimes a singer would skip a beat. An especially big boom produced screams and howls of dismay from the audience, blended with the clank and clatter of shattered stained glass raining to the cathedral’s stone floor. But for the most part the music played sweetly, until it didn’t. Then there was nothing. Paris is gone, she texted.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 311</div></div><p>The following is a Morse-code conversation between Dinah and Rufus (daughter and father) just as the Hard Rain was really picking up momentum. It would be their last conversation. It made me laugh—Stephenson is quite good at snappy, heroic dialogue.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p><strong>Rufus:</strong> HOT ENOUGH TO BAKE TATERS ON HOOD OF THIS TRUCK<br>
<strong>Dinah:</strong> GO INSIDE DAD<br>
<strong>Rufus:</strong> NOT KIDDING ABOUT THERMAL EFFECTS. PAINT BUBBLING<br>
<strong>Dinah:</strong> I AM NOT KIDDING EITHER YOU HAVE TO GET INSIDE<br>
<strong>Rufus:</strong> GOT A SPACE BLANKET TO PROTECT ME WHEN I MAKE A RUN FOR IT<br>
<strong>Dinah:</strong> THEN FOR GODS SAKE USE IT DAD<br>
<strong>Rufus:</strong> AH BUT THEN I CAN’T CHEW THE RAG WITH YOU ANY LONGER DINAH<br>
<strong>Dinah:</strong> WHAT IF YOUR GAS TANK EXPLODES<br>
<strong>Rufus:</strong> HA HA WE DRAINED IT FOR GENERATOR FUEL. WAY AHEAD OF YOU KID<br>
<strong>Dinah:</strong> GOD U R A SMARTASS</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 322</div></div><p>This next bit was I thought a bit too wishy-washy of Stephenson, unfair to Dinah. I would have thought that Dinah would know exactly how to feel about Julia: that she should be pushed out of an airlock. The woman was clearly a dangerous purely political animal from the get-go. But alas, future plot twists rested on her survival, so everybody had to be stupid about her.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Dinah had no precedents to tell her how she should feel toward the ex-president at a time like this. On the one hand, her behavior had been reprehensible. On the other, she had, within the last few hours, lost her husband, her daughter, her country, and her job.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 346</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Markus pointed out, “so no more chatter from now on, please. Slava—” and he broke into a string of bad Russian meaning something like I trade places with you now. Vyacheslav responded in equally bad German. Both men were perfectly fluent in English. But they made a private joke of butchering each other’s languages, ostensibly as part of a project to preserve Old Earth’s linguistic heritage.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 372</div></div><p>I just liked this idea that these guys would not just choose the easiest language to communicate in, not necessarily because they were bored, but because they just naturally squeeze as much challenge as possible out of everything.</p>
<p>The next long passage is what I found to be a lovely description of the trickiness of orbital calculation when atmosphere and irregular shapes and surfaces were thrown into the mix.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;As these things went, drag wasn’t that difficult to calculate. Its effect on their course could be estimated. But because the ice shard wasn’t a symmetrical body, coming in straight, it was also going to generate some lift. Not a lot of lift—nothing like an airplane wing—but some. If that lift got aimed in the wrong direction it would make Ymir veer downward, like a stricken airplane going into its death spiral. But if they aimed it up, it would ease their passage by pushing them away from the Earth into an altitude where air was thinner. They would lose the benefit of lift then and drift back downward, but as the air got thicker, the lift would resume and push them back up. They might skip off the atmosphere several times during the hectic half hour when they were slingshotting around the world. The results would have been difficult to predict even if Ymir had been a traditional vehicle with a fixed and regular shape. But the shard was irregular. They didn’t have time to measure it and to feed the data into an aerodynamics simulator, so they could only guess how much lift it was going to produce. And when its leading edge and its underside began to plow through the air—even though the air might be so thin as to be indistinguishable, for most purposes, from a vacuum—it was going to heat up. Steam would rise from it, producing some amount of upward thrust, and its shape would change. So even if they had been able to simulate the shard’s aerodynamics, its lift and its drag, those numbers would quickly have become wrong during its first encounter with the upper air. Compared with all of those complexities, the fact that Ymir would be flying backward while operating a damaged, experimental nuclear propulsion system at maximum power seemed like a mere detail.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 412</div></div><p>The next discussion is about Julia (JBR), the former President of the former United States, who is causing no end of trouble with agitation and foment of revolution in order to agglomerate power to herself. As Luisa points out, trying to find method in the madness is most likely futile. Luisa&rsquo;s statement (emphasized) is an apt description of the power-hungry of most political structures.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Luisa just sat there in her listening shrink mode. “It would be easier,” Doob said, “if I could figure out what the hell she wanted.” <strong>“You’re assuming,” Luisa said, “that she has a plan. I doubt that she does. She is driven to seek power. She finds some way to do that and then backfills a rationalization for it afterward.”</strong> Doob pulled his tablet closer and started trying to find Tav’s blog. “To what extent do you imagine she really is reporting facts about the AC? As opposed to creating the reality she describes?” Doob asked. “What’s the difference?” Luisa asked.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 424</div></div><p>Slava again, being a cool, hardcore, improvising Russian astronaut.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;A man in a space suit was visible on the outside of Ymir, “walking” toward the stern by using a pair of Grabbs as mobile anchor points. This had to be Vyacheslav. His feet had sprouted thick white whiskers. It took Dinah a few moments to make sense of the image: he had zip-tied each foot to the back of a Grabb, and the “whiskers” were the protruding ends of the zip ties. It was the kind of improvisation that would have made old-school NASA engineers turn over in their graves, had the Hard Rain not eliminated that possibility. But in the last two years, and particularly the last two weeks, this kind of hillbilly engineering had become routine.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 447</div></div><p>Telka. Another cool, Russian astronaut. Also more background on the disease called Julia.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;“Problem is solved,” Tekla said. She was fluent in English and was perfectly capable of saying “The problem is solved,” but sometimes dropped the article for effect. Anglophones found this mysterious and impressive. It was also an implicit statement of Russian pride. The language of the Cloud Ark, by default, was English. That was never going to change. But the dialect was going to evolve over time, and Russians could bend it in their direction by finding ways to inject their grammar and vocabulary into everyday speech. “Burn is complete,” she went on. “But the ship is still tumbling out of control!” said the American boy who so fancied his own intelligence. “Slow tumble,” Tekla said. “Not problem. Plenty of time to fix now that perigee is raised.” “Fix it how?! Markus demolished three of the external thruster packages by ramming them! Who does that? Anyway, there are only two of them left. It is a basic reality of physics that you can’t control a three-axis tumble using only two thrusters!” “Thank you for explaining basic reality,” Tekla said. “Tumble can be eliminated by making scarfed nozzle.” This silenced them for a few moments. One of Julia’s followers—Jianyu, a Chinese Arkie, very passionate about going to Mars—looked like he understood it. Tekla nodded in his direction. “This man will explain later. My time here is limited.” “Yes, Tekla, and we do appreciate that you’ve been able to make time for us at all,” Julia said. Tekla wanted to slap her so much that her hand actually twitched. The sentence Julia had just spoken, had it been delivered in a different tone, might have actually meant what it said. Instead of which, it meant I am being callously ignored and it’s about time someone important came out to talk to me. Tekla had an almost physical sense of how that mentality was radiating outward from Julia to infect the other Arkies.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 455</div></div><p>Tekla, again being very bad-ass with an innovative out-of-the-box-thinking solution that wouldn&rsquo;t have occurred to any of the others.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;All eyes were on Aïda. She would not look back at them. She was, at bottom, very shy. “Whatever,” she mumbled. “She needs to see your vote,” Ivy said. “Really? You mean that I could single-handedly destroy the entire human race, simply by not putting my thumb up in the next seven minutes?” Tekla pulled a folding knife from a pocket on her coverall and flicked the blade open. She kept it low, down in her lap, and pretended to clean a fingernail with it. “Either that,” Tekla said, “or population of human race suddenly goes from eight to seven, and we have unanimous decision.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 563</div></div><p>And Dinah. Not Russian, but very cool…and offering an insight about soft, squishy, manipulative power.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Really—she now understood—what had prompted her to slam the table and get up and storm out of the Banana a few minutes ago had not been Aïda at all. Aïda was provocative, yes. But more infuriating had been a slow burn that had started with Camila, and her remarks about aggression. Remarks that Dinah now saw as aimed not so much at Dinah as at Markus. She wished she could grab Camila by the scruff of the neck and sit her down in front of a display and make her watch the way Markus had spent the last minutes of his life. Markus was a hero. It seemed to Dinah that Camila wanted to strip humanity of its heroes. She’d couched what she’d said in terms of aggression. But by doing so, Camila was just being aggressive in a different way—a passive-aggressive way that Dinah, raised as she’d been raised, couldn’t help seeing as sneaky. More destructive, in the end, than the overt kind of aggression.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 566</div></div><p>Stephenson once again describing what it&rsquo;s like inside the mind of an enlightened scientist, the struggle between enjoying something viscerally and understanding how that feeling came about.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;She hesitated to lower the helmet over her face. This would be her last opportunity for a while to breathe the fresh air of New Earth. The scientist in her was at odds with a deeper layer, common to all human races, that wanted to see beauty and purpose in the “natural” world. She knew perfectly well what Doc—or just about any other Ivyn—would say to her, if he could read her mind. The water in that lake below you is there because we crashed comet cores into the dead Earth until it stayed wet. The air you’re breathing was manufactured by organisms we genetically engineered and sprayed all over the wet planet, then killed once they had accomplished their task. And the sharp scent you like so much comes from vegetation that, for many years, existed only as a string of binary digits stored on a thumb drive on a string around the neck of your Eve. None of which changed the fact that she liked it.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 575</div></div><p>These next few citations are more passages that I found especially nicely written, mostly describing some facet of technology 5000 years in the future.</p>
<p>This one&rsquo;s about a digital acoustic array.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;She could hear the wind. A phrase that didn’t really do justice to the soundscape now being rendered by the array of miniature speakers. “The canid smelled the forest” was a completely different sentence from “The man smelled the forest,” not because the words had different meanings, but because the canid’s olfactory apparatus was infinitely superior to that of the man. In a loosely analogous way, the real-time, three-dimensional sonic portrait of the wind generated by the glider’s onboard systems and rendered by the helmet’s speakers was as far beyond what she could sense with unaided ears as the canid’s scenting of the forest was beyond the man’s.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 577</div></div><p>This one&rsquo;s about the Eye.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;She was now “looking” at an enhanced view of the universe from their current location, which was just inside, but rapidly approaching, the habitat ring. The ring was spinning past them. It was a little like being on the inside of a carousel watching the horses wheel by, except that instead of horses, these were space habitats as much as thirty kilometers across, and they were moving at three thousand meters per second. The task was to shoot between two of them without getting hit. By the standards of orbital mechanics it was no great feat, but it looked shockingly dangerous, and as such it was great fun to watch. As Kath Two looked straight ahead, the habitats seemed to be whizzing across their path like the teeth of a buzz saw. But through an apparent miracle the flivver found a gap between two of them.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 615</div></div><p>This one explains why some technology has lagged behind.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The end result, for a young woman in a bookstall above a tube station on the Great Chain, was that she was dwelling in habitats, and being moved around by machines, far beyond the capabilities of Old Earth. She was being served and looked after by robots that were smarter and more robust than their ancestors—the Grabbs and so on that Eve Dinah had programmed on Izzy. And yet the information storage capacity of her tablet, and its ability to connect, were still limited enough that it made sense for her to download books over a cable while that was easy, and to make room for them in the tablet’s storage chips by deleting things she had already read.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 642</div></div><p>Also, its not like humanity&rsquo;s capabilities and knowledge of manufacturing is collected in a Wiki. Most of the high-tech stuff is private. There are patents, but they are missing several orders of magnitude of detail on exactly how to mass-produce this stuff. Not only did they make a cultural decision to keep certain abilities grounded in humanity or not as enhanced as much, but they wouldn&rsquo;t have necessarily been able to easily reproduce everything that &ldquo;old&rdquo; humanity had discovered.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;After that it had all been oral history for about a thousand years, since there had been no paper to write on and no ink to write on it with. Memory devices were scarce and jury-rigged. Every single chip had been used for critical functions such as robots and life support.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 643</div></div><p>Can&rsquo;t waste precious non-reproducible tech on frippery.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The carbon cables that held Cradle suspended above Earth’s atmosphere some thirty-six thousand kilometers below diverged here and ran taut through long sheltered passageways all the way to the other end of the Eye, where they came together again and emerged to connect with the Big Rock beyond.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 644</div></div><p>The Eye is 160km across! More stuff about the Eye below.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Inward of that were the sixteen orifices where the tether’s primary cables were routed into the frame of the Eye. Each of those cables, though it looked solid from a distance, was actually made of sixteen more cables, and so on and so forth down to a few fractal iterations. All of these ran parallel between the Eye and Cradle. Webbing them together was a network of smaller diagonal tendons, arranged so that if one cable broke, neighboring ones would take the force until a robot could be sent out to repair it. Cables broke all the time, because they’d been hit by bolides or simply because they had “aged out,” and so if you squinted your eyes and looked closely enough at the tether, you could see that it was alive with robots. Some of these were the size of buildings, and clambered up and down the largest cables simply to act as mother ships for swarms of smaller robots that would actually effect the repairs. This had been going on, to a greater or lesser extent, for many centuries.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 645</div></div><p>On to the Cradle.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;At the time Kath Two and the other passengers arrived, Cradle was dangling two thousand meters above the waters of the Atlantic Ocean, being dragged due west toward where the equator cut across the reshaped coastline of South America. This movement reflected the fact that, thirty-six thousand kilometers above it, the Eye was traversing the habitat ring westward, or CASFON (Clockwise As Seen From Over the North pole). Being nothing more than a weight on the end of a long string, Cradle always followed the movements of the Eye. The city’s dome was open, with its baffles raised to reduce the windblast.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 655</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Here and there one might stumble across a museum display in which a few dozen or even a few hundred types of ambots had been rendered inert and mounted to a wall with explanatory plaques beneath them explaining in what millennium they had been invented,&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 676</div></div><p>There is an emphasis on physicality that is at odds with today&rsquo;s trends of digitalization. No reproduction if VR? In 5000 years?</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The Dinan looked to be about forty years old. The scars on his face had been there for a long time. “One of those,” she said, nodding at a nearby tap handle adorned with a handwritten label identifying it as cider.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 677</div></div><p>Scars? Why? They can&rsquo;t fix it? Why hand-written notes? On paper? Stephenson seems to be striving for a relatable physicality/relatability that is just not plausible.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;If history was any guide, those best at violence might end up ruling over everyone else. Aïda was not about to see her children dominated by the sons and daughters of Tekla.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 684</div></div><p>OMG Who cares? Honestly: is the rest of the world so utterly unable to consider the philosophy of wondering why the fuck you should care? There are seven of you left to resurrect humanity. How could anyone possible still care about budging in line or care about whose kin would be left? Not even a single word of consideration that no-one would care? Only Dinah&rsquo;s little stunt with the bomb deviated from this single-mindedness, but she too succumbed to wanting to beat Aïda, in the end.</p>
<p>Cradle docking…and how humdrum something so fantastic quickly becomes. Pretty much like we complain about how terrible air travel is when it&rsquo;s just fucking amazing that you can shoot back and forth between continents in less than a day.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;A few politicians and generals, who had leaned back from their breakfasts to observe the docking and admire the profile of Cayambe Volcano, bent forward again, picked up their forks, and resumed their conversations. Cradle had just become the largest city on New Earth, and was scheduled to remain so for twenty-four hours.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 695</div></div><p>Tyuratam is clearly going to be one of Stephenson&rsquo;s favorites—the all-rounder.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;He had advanced, in other words, to higher levels of mental activity while always doing enough of the floor mopping and glass polishing to remain in physical contact with the business of the bar and in human contact with the staff.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 696</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;It didn’t really matter that these people were making all sorts of wrong assumptions about how his mind and his body were changing. What mattered to them, he had finally come to realize, was that they believed such things to be true. It was more important to them to believe it than it was for him to explain the facts of the situation, and so he had decided to let them think what they thought and to try to find constructive ways to use it.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 713</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Airplanes were expensive, even more so than they had been on Old Earth. They were too large to manufacture in the ring and transport down to the surface and so they, and other large productions such as arks and ships, had to be built in factories on the surface. Typically these lay on the outskirts of Cradle sockets. In any case, planes had to be babied, given that high-capacity turbofan engines were extraordinarily difficult to make.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 727</div></div><p>It&rsquo;s nice to see Stephenson acknowledging how deep our production chain is in the 20th and 21 centuries—and how difficult it would be to reproduce it, even with thousands of years. The focus would have to be the same, and humans would be spending millennia in space, where requirements are different, not a lot of space, . much harsher safety requirements, less focus on pure science and leisure. When you spend the half the time trying to keep bags of meat compartmentalized to avoid large losses and the other half in providing the food, water and air that was otherwise available for free, you can see how it might take a lot longer to building giant airplanes.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The habitats had been only a few kilometers away on Cleft. In fact, nearly all settlement had been confined to Cleft until early in the Second Millennium, when the industrial base had developed to the point where other rocks could be colonized. Many more such communities had been depicted in fictional entertainments than had actually existed. This didn’t matter, though. As the almost totally factitious and romanticized Old West had been to American culture of the twentieth century, so those yarns were to the people of the habitat ring. So in the rare cases when actual settlements of that type were constructed de novo, as here, they tended to be built so as to meet the expectations of people who their whole lives had been watching fiction serials about their Second Millennium precursors.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 730</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;After a minute of sizing them up, the older Digger stomped forward a couple of paces and spoke in the pre-Zero English that all Spacers knew from the Epic: “Cowards who ran away, you are trespassing on a world that is no longer yours to call home. Begone.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 752</div></div><p>This is justifiable from the Digger&rsquo;s point of view, right? He sees only that he and his tribe have, against all reasonable odds, survived 5000 years underground, more or less sane (i.e. able to continue a tool-using society) and didn&rsquo;t &ldquo;abandon&rdquo; the soil. From the point of view of the Spacers, it&rsquo;s an ungrateful stance, as it fails to acknowledge the Spacer&rsquo;s efforts in terraforming Earth so that they can all be on the surface in the first place. The Diggers technically abandoned the surface as well, just as much as the Spacers. Neither abandoned Earth, as such. Arguably, the Spacers did much more to preserve humanity than the Diggers, which lost much more of history. The Hard Rain was over in 5000 years. Who know how many millions of years it would have taken to replicate the achievements of a couple centuries&rsquo; worth of dedicated terraforming. The Diggers weren&rsquo;t capable to doing anything about their situation until the Spacers &ldquo;saved&rdquo; them. It&rsquo;s unlikely that the Diggers will see it that way, though.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;In other words, the Diggers were, as a whole, reacting much as any other group of humans might have done. Which was interesting and important data in and of itself, since much might have changed during five thousand years in the mines.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 754</div></div><p>Despite the debt that the Diggers obviously owe the Spacers for having freed them from the underground prison much earlier than would have naturally been possible, we wonder how forthright the Spacers will be in collecting on this debt. Will the Diggers be treated like the Native Americans were by the Europeans? I.e. eliminated as useless, backwoods dross? Or forced to integrate? Or be left to reservations on the surface?</p>
<h2>Errata</h2><p>No errata detected. No shit. Not a single one.</p>
<p><hr></p>
<div class="footnote-reference"><span id="footnote_DRAFTABLE_ENTRY_3213_1_body" class="footnote-number">[1]</span> I&rsquo;ve read and enjoyed all of his previous tomes: all three books of <em>The Baroque Cycle</em>, <em>The Cryptonomicon</em>, <em>Anathem</em>, <em>Reamde</em></div><div class="footnote-reference"><span id="footnote_DRAFTABLE_ENTRY_3213_2_body" class="footnote-number">[2]</span> The ending came up so quickly, and after such a lush level of detail and building of the world 5000 years in the future, that it&rsquo;s hard to imagine that Stephenson doesn&rsquo;t have anything left to say. That said, an outline of a story arc (which he almost certainly has) is not a book and he still has to get up the steam to write it.</div><div class="footnote-reference"><span id="footnote_DRAFTABLE_ENTRY_3213_3_body" class="footnote-number">[3]</span> After having also gotten in Hugh Howey&rsquo;s <em>Wool</em> series, which, while an interesting read, also suffers from a dearth of deeper analysis about the end of humanity, I think maybe I&rsquo;ve finally found a topic I can claim for my own book.</div><div class="footnote-reference"><span id="footnote_DRAFTABLE_ENTRY_3213_4_body" class="footnote-number">[4]</span> I don&rsquo;t mean by this that Rufus is stupid enough to believe he&rsquo;ll live to 10,000 years old but that he wants his progeny to survive the Hard Rain. I assume he just expects to live out his remaining normal life span.</div><div class="footnote-reference"><span id="footnote_DRAFTABLE_ENTRY_3213_5_body" class="footnote-number">[5]</span> Even if said coddling would prevent them all from tearing other apart in a final orgy of senseless destruction just before they are well and truly destroyed by the Hard Rain. Sean Probst gives zero fucks bout that, too. Sean Probst cares about not being stupid of facile in pretending that a solution will work when it will clearly not, especially when Sean Probst can make it work. He&rsquo;s a fun character, actually.</div><div class="footnote-reference"><span id="footnote_DRAFTABLE_ENTRY_3213_6_body" class="footnote-number">[6]</span> Utterly cementing his reputation as a giver-of-zero-fucks bad-ass whose only aim is to just get the damned mission done right, said mission being giving humans in space a fighting chance by first providing Amalthea for iron (through his company, prior to the Agent) and then by providing Ymir for volatiles. Humanity is now well and truly sorted. You&rsquo;re welcome, humanity. Mic-drop. Probst out.</div>      </div>
      </div>
        <div class="footer">
    <div class="footer-data"><div class="footer-links"><ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/contact.php" title="">Contact</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/support.php" title="">Support</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/privacy.php" title="">Privacy</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/rights.php" title="">Rights</a></li></ul></div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="copyright">Copyright (c) 1999-2026 earthli.com. All Rights Reserved.</div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="versions">Powered by <ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore/app_news.php">earthli News 3.7</a></li><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore" title="">earthli WebCore&trade; 3.7</a></li></ul></div></div>    </div>
      </div>
  </div>  </body>
</html>
]]>
  </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
      <title type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[Books read in 2014]]>
  </title>
    <id>https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3068</id>
    <link href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3068"/>
    <updated>2015-05-17T17:32:51+02:00</updated>
    <author>
        <name type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[Marco von Ballmoos]]>
  </name>
      <uri>https://earthli.com/users/marco</uri>
    </author>
      <summary type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<dl><dt class="field">The Name of the Rose (1983/en)</dt>
<dd><div class=" "><p>by <em>Umberto Eco</em></p>
<p>This book is about a series of murders in an abbey in 12th-century Italy. A battle rages between opposed forces within the church, with some siding with the Pope and others not. The schism approaches, inquisitional troops roam the land. A very... [<a class="complete-text-link" href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3068">More</a>]</p>
</div></dd>
</dl>]]>
  </summary>
      <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<html lang="en">
  <head>
    <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/themes/ice.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/fonts/raleway.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/core/medium.css">
  </head>
  <body>
<div class="style-controls">  <div class="page">
    <div class="page-body">
<div class="info-box-top">
<p>
Published by <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_user.php?name=marco" title="Marco von Ballmoos" class="visible">marco</a> on <span class="date-time">17. May 2015 17:32:51 (GMT-5)</span>
</p>
</div>
      <div class="text-flow wide">
  <dl><dt class="field">The Name of the Rose (1983/en)</dt>
<dd><div class=" "><p>by <em>Umberto Eco</em></p>
<p>This book is about a series of murders in an abbey in 12th-century Italy. A battle rages between opposed forces within the church, with some siding with the Pope and others not. The schism approaches, inquisitional troops roam the land. A very well-educated and modern monk, William of Baskerville, arrives at the abbey with his novice Melk in tow, to whom he is imparting not only wisdom but the kind of inquisitive mind that will be capable of acquiring such on its own at some point.</p>
<p>The story is told from Melk&rsquo;s point of view as an autobiography ostensibly written many decades later. They arrive in time for the first in a series of murders and investigate it, as far as they are allowed. Intrigues abound, books—the lifeblood of the abbey—are pored over, characters are introduced. There is the brutish but sly Salvatore, the crooked Remigio and many others who contribute information as well as layers of intrigue.</p>
<p>The abbey&rsquo;s magnificent and labyrinthine library is the centerpiece, with its star-shaped architecture, many rooms, hidden hallways and cryptic signs. As with Foucault&rsquo;s Pendulum, Eco proves himself the master of a genre with which most are only familiar through the pale shadow that is Dan Brown. Eco’s research is legendary, if you can get past the pomposity, which is generally quite easy.</p>
<p>I&rsquo;ve included <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3046">notes, citations and errata</a> in a separate post.</p>
</div></dd>
<dt class="field">Reamde (2011)</dt>
<dd><div class=" "><p>by <em>Neal Stephenson</em></p>
<p>The sweeping, all-encompassing nature of the plot reminded me strongly of the Baroque Cycle (also by Stephenson). His attention to detail in some cases was at times tedious, but his dialogue and character development are top-notch. There are plenty of cool heroes here, with only a handful of them belonging to the 1%, unlike so much other escapist fiction these days.</p>
<p>The Cryptonomicon took us to Southeast Asia with hackers and programmers and dealt with ultra-secret code-crackers, chip-manufacturing plants and groups of people connected by tenuous though significant strands over decades.</p>
<p>This book also takes us to Southeast Asia and to many other places besides, with a good part of it taking place in the Pacific Northwest, on both sides of the U.S./Canadian border.</p>
<p>In the detailed notes, I try to summarize what I remember having happened in this book because it was quite literally one of the wildest rides I’ve read, with what would have been ludicrous coincidences from many other authors. Detailed in Stephenson’s style, however, the story arc remained cohesive throughout over 1000 pages. Spoilers abound in the summary below, so proceed with caution.</p>
<p>I&rsquo;ve included <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=2949">notes, citations and errata</a> in a separate post.</p>
</div></dd>
<dt class="field">Let’s Explore Diabetes with Owls (2013)</dt>
<dd><div class=" "><p>by <em>David Sedaris</em></p>
<p>This is another collection of essays about Sedaris&rsquo;s life in France and now England and his quirky/crazy family, all told in his inimitable style. He covers topics from child-rearing tips (he has no children of his own) to his former lifestyle as a young, avant-garde artist to his one-man attack on the litter of England, where he&rsquo;d moved after living in Normandy [1], to commentary on modern life, particularly the egocentricity of it all, not without noting the irony of an author who can&rsquo;t seem to write about anything but himself.</p>
<p>I&rsquo;ve included <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3048">notes, citations and errata</a> in a separate post.</p>
</div></dd>
<dt class="field">I Never Promised You a Rose Garden (1964)</dt>
<dd><div class=" "><p>by <em>Joanne Greenberg</em></p>
<p>This is the story of one woman&rsquo;s struggle with mental illness/schizophrenia in a mental institution in the U.S. in the late 50s/early 60s. It is semi-autobiographical and contains what felt like authentic and insightful descriptions of what mental illness feels like. Well-written and evocative examples abound in the citations included below.</p>
<p>There are several instances where she writes that her senses just shut down. She sees in only two dimensions; she can barely hear anything; she sees only shades of gray and often through a pinhole, a keyhole, a slit. She cannot feel anything. She burns her flesh and doesn’t feel the pain. She eats but does not taste and does not remember having eaten.</p>
<p>She tells of watching other patients in this catatonia, being struck by other wild patients and not reacting at all. They only blink slowly. This is a communication failure between one without senses and one with a private language. It’s utterly fascinating when thought of in these terms.</p>
<p>It’s also a metaphor for how the so-called normal people interact with one another, making the same mistakes but less overtly and less catastrophically poorly. On a class, caste or national level, the catastrophic miscommunication is the same.</p>
<p>I&rsquo;ve included <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=2893">notes, citations and errata</a> in a separate post.</p>
</div></dd>
<dt class="field">The Brothers Karamazov (1880)</dt>
<dd><div class=" "><p>by <em>Fyodor Dostoyevsky</em></p>
<p>Like Tolstoy’s novels, this was published in series in a magazine of the time called <em>The Messenger</em>. There isn’t much of an encompassing story arc—at least not when compared to more modern authors, like Stephenson (above) or Martin (below)—so it’s hard to call it a novel as such. It felt more like a collection of short stories and novellas that included the same cast of characters.</p>
<p>The first part is a long introduction to the debauched family of the Karamazovs and the other locals whom they’ve drawn into their tawdry orbit. At the center of the first act is the patriarch Fyodor, who argumentatively fences with his three sons, Ivan, Dmitri (Mitya) and Alexander (Alyosha). There is a fourth (possible) son in the person of Smerdyakov.</p>
<p>A subsequent longer section is a sermon by Ivan, as told to Alyosha. This was the most interesting part of the book. It is also the most famous part, for which many seem to excuse the other 95% of relatively mediocre material.</p>
<p>With modern literature—that is, written during my time or near to it, say mid-20th century and onward—I can usually determine the intended tone of the writing. Is the author espousing his own views through a character? Or is the author espousing views he does not support through that character? If a character is ludicrous and pompous and just out-and-out wrong-headed, I can laugh along, knowing that the author intended to parody opposing worldviews.</p>
<p>However, with Dostoyevsky (and, to a lesser degree, with Tolstoy), while I know what I think of the characters and their views, I am often unsure of what the author intended. I feel like the guy who laughs out loud at a sad movie because he doesn’t realize that the director was being dead-serious.</p>
<p>This doesn’t interfere with my enjoyment of the writing—such as it is—but it certainly makes it more difficult to slog through long conversations between what I consider to be fools discussing utter foolishness when I don’t know whether the author is in on the joke. In net effect, I feel that I can read more of the exact same writing when I know it’s a parody than when I feel that the author intended to convey what he or she considers to be deep truths.</p>
<p>It may reflect poorly on me, I suppose.</p>
<p>Perhaps something is lost in translation or there is too great a distance between the culture that created the literature. I feel that my enjoyment of this type of great literature is too superficial. I see sparks where I feel that I am in on the joke, where I appreciate a bit of cleverness or phrase, but I am saddled with doubt that I am enjoying the right thing.</p>
<p>On the other hand, I don’t want to be told by experts how I’m supposed to enjoy the book. I would like to be able to enjoy the ins and outs without help but, short of becoming a fluent reader of Russian and possibly more of an expert on a culture and mindset that lies over a century in the past, this will not be possible. That is, I can enjoy other good works on a much deeper level that I can these great works of art.</p>
<p>That’s OK, though. I just wish that people would hedge their recommendation that “everyone should read these” to acknowledge that the level of enjoyment, satisfaction and understanding will vary greatly. While this is always the case, it is all the more likely when the original language and culture of the author of the work stands in such stark contrast to that of the reader.</p>
<p>I&rsquo;ve included <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=2984">notes, citations and errata</a> in a separate post.</p>
</div></dd>
<dt class="field">The Idiot (1869)</dt>
<dd><div class=" "><p>by <em>Fyodor Dostoyevsky</em></p>
<p>The idiot is the tale of a Russian expatriate named Prince Lef Muishin who returns to Russia from having lived in Switzerland. He was sent to Switzerland in order to cure his chronic epilepsy, which rendered him stupefied and nearly speechless—for all intents and purposes an idiot.</p>
<p>He returns penniless but quickly ingratiates himself to a noble family, which agrees to take him in, if only for a while. The cast of characters surrounding him is wild and foolish and, as in so many other Russian novels, utterly and completely useless. There is almost no indication of where money comes from—it might just as well grow on trees. The others consider the prince an idiot, but he evinces deeper philosophical thinking than the rest of them put together and is much more eloquent, to boot. I assumed that to be part of the irony intended by the author (see mydiscussion of such assumptions above, in my notes on <em>The Brothers Karamazov</em>).</p>
<p>The plot is very bare, but consists of sketches, almost like theater pieces, that feels much more like <em>The Brothers Karamazov</em> than his earlier work <em>Crime and Punishment</em>.</p>
<p>Dostoyevsky doesn&rsquo;t waste many words on descriptions of places or people (at least in this novel; see my notes on <em>Crime and Punishment</em> below for a different story). Places have names, women are beautiful and men are distinguished. Occasionally someone is said to have a mustache but this level of descriptiveness seems to exhaust the author and it generally ends there.</p>
<p>As in <em>The Brothers Karamazov</em>, the characters ricochet from joy to abject misery within seconds, constantly shouting and rejoicing as if they are capable of feeling only exaggerated emotions. People fall in love in minutes. It’s kind of crazy, really, and sometimes hard to understand how something that reads so much like a Mexican telenovella script can be called some of the world’s best literature. There is almost no metaphor or simile in <em>The Idiot</em> (in contrast to <em>The Brothers Karamazov</em>, which had a bit more philosophizing, particularly by Ivan).</p>
<p>I&rsquo;ve included <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=2991">notes, citations and errata</a> in a separate post.</p>
</div></dd>
<dt class="field">Crime and Punishment (1866)</dt>
<dd><div class=" "><p>by <em>Fyodor Dostoyevsky</em></p>
<p>Crime and Punishment is different from Dostoyevsky&rsquo;s later novels—significantly so. Here the descriptions of the environment, the characters and the situations are visceral and wonderfully done. The misery is heartrending but at least it doesn’t feel plastic and fake. There are descriptions on a par with the masters of the form, Tolstoy or Twain, whose depictions of nature were absolutely lovely and evoked comparably visceral emotion.</p>
<p>His descriptions of despair and suffering and entrapment-by-life are unparalleled. The situations he posits seem unreal though they were likely all too real for all too many. The past tense is inappropriate here, for even in the modern day, in the most modern of countries, the cruelty of Dostoyevsky’s reality is played out day after sorrowful, miserable day with no hope or end in sight, other than through the sweet, sweet release of death.</p>
<p>The scene with the horse pulling the overloaded carriage (see notes below for citations) is noteworthy because of the depths of human depravity it shows, the utter disregard for another creature’s suffering. A similar <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3011#poor-old-whale">scene with an old, old whale</a> in <em>Moby Dick</em> would remind me of this one. The scene is presumably a metaphor for the way in which the less fortunate are misused and mistreated and depleted by those above them, even if only a very little bit above them. Even if they themselves aren’t all so fortunate, all the more reason to dump on those less capable of defending themselves, all the more reason to make others suffer as they themselves are made to suffer by those above them. Or maybe it’s a cautionary tale of drunkenness; it&rsquo;s hard to tell.</p>
<p>The false palliatives of religion are next on the chopping block, with its purveyors offering advice that is completely at odds with the common logic of life. Especially and exactly for those who suffer the most, that have the least to thank a supposedly benevolent but also mysterious and uncaring God.</p>
<p>I&rsquo;ve included <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3076">notes, citations and errata</a> in a separate post.</p>
</div></dd>
<dt class="field">Age of Ultron (2013)</dt>
<dd>This is the comic-book series on which the upcoming Avengers movie is based. It was a bit woodenly written, but what the hell, I&rsquo;d just finished three Dostoyevsky novels: what did I expect? The artwork wasn&rsquo;t really my style and the story was about time-travel, in an effort to stop Ultron. See the Wikipedia article for a full summary. It passed the time.</dd>
<dt class="field">Superior Spider-Man (2013)</dt>
<dd>This is the series of Spider-Man comics that followed Doctor Octavius&rsquo;s physical death, during which he imposed his psyche and memories—his entire mind—into the brain of Peter Parker. This pushes Peter&rsquo;s mind to the background and Octavius takes over as Spider-Man. People notice as he finally starts to take charge in a way that Peter never did. Despite Peter&rsquo;s quite advanced intellect, he never quite had the willpower of Doc Ock, and never achieved nearly as much as when Ock is in the driver&rsquo;s seat. Doc employs his penchant for technological devices to enhance Spider-Man&rsquo;s reach and power and becomes a tyrant over New York—although it&rsquo;s admitted that he&rsquo;s doing quite a good job of crime-fighting. All in all, a decent comic series. The Team-Up editions include some lovely, lovely work by Joe Madureira.</dd>
<dt class="field">Moby-Dick; or, The Whale (1851)</dt>
<dd><div class=" "><p>by <em>Herman Melville</em></p>
<p>The impression I got of this work when I tried reading it as a teenager caused me to avoid reading it as an adult, until now. This is a pity because it is, for the most part, a wonderfully written and action-packed tale that puts you remarkably into the heart of a dangerous profession like whaling with a vividness I didn’t think possible. Not only that, but there are nuggets of wonderfully written wisdom strewn liberally throughout. The descriptions of the action are as visceral as Tolstoy’s.</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Few are the foreheads which like Shakespeare’s or Melancthon’s rise so high, and descend so low, that the eyes themselves seem clear, eternal, tideless mountain lakes; and all above them in the forehead’s wrinkles, you seem to track the antlered thoughts descending there to drink, as the Highland hunters track the snow prints of the deer.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>Highly recommended. Loved it.</p>
<p>I&rsquo;ve included <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3011">notes, citations and errata</a> in a separate post.</p>
</div></dd>
<dt class="field">Dracula (1897)</dt>
<dd><div class=" "><p>by <em>Bram Stoker</em></p>
<p>This book charges out of the gate and is quite enthralling—no pun intended—in a very modern way. Unfortunately, after the whole merry band of characters is introduced and expertly knit together, the book bogs down in professions of fealty and undying love and respect and myriad other forms of swearing undying and lifelong allegiance to one another.</p>
<p>There is also the not easily overlooked heavily misogynistic aspect of the novel. The ladies Lucy and Mina are introduced as very clever and very capable…for ladies, that is. These females make the most of their paucity of gray matter with which the good Lord blessed them and all others of their ilk, those ill-fated bearers of only one, solitary type of chromosome. Stoker makes sure to let the inadequacy of the female thinking capacity be extensively explained by the women themselves, which seems to be the only thing at which the feeble intellect of a woman is capable of excelling.</p>
<p>They are not the only ones who suffer thusly. Dracula is also not considered very clever and possessed of only a child brain.</p>
<p>The group of gentlemen was perhaps revolutionary at the time, but is now somewhat trite: a doctor in charge of an insane asylum (Dr. Seward); a Renaissance man, well-learned in all manner of arcane minutiae who also happens to be well-acquainted with the dark corners of the occult, Dr. Van Helsing; a brave, competent and not unwealthy Texan in the form of Quincey Morris; a Lord Gondalming (Arthur Holmwood) who throws money and influence about; and, finally, Jonathan Harker, a lawyer who just happened to have come into a magnificent inheritance. The two ladies are, of course, more beautiful than anything this side of the angels. Not much tension there. It&rsquo;s kind of like reading Stieg Larsson.</p>
<p>Read the first half, it&rsquo;s quite good. The second half drags tremendously.</p>
<p>I&rsquo;ve included <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3021">notes, citations and errata</a> in a separate post.</p>
</div></dd>
<dt class="field">Raising Steam (2014)</dt>
<dd><div class=" "><p>by <em>Terry Pratchett</em></p>
<p>The latest—and likely last [2]—of the DiscWorld books feels a bit like a last hurrah. Pratchett&rsquo;s style is at times reminiscent of his old self, but is for at least half of the book much more stilted and preachier than was his wont. Still, the flight smooths out after a bit and it&rsquo;s entertaining enough. There is no tension, as such, since you know that no-one important is going to die. All of the characters fulfill the roles that you expect them to. There are goblins and golems and gargoyles and gnomes as well as dwarves, vampires, igors, trolls and zombies. Humans are there too, of course. I also read <em>Snuff</em> at around the same time and preferred that by a wide margin.</p>
<p>I&rsquo;ve included <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3086">notes, citations and errata</a> in a separate post.</p>
</div></dd>
<dt class="field">Don Quixote (1605)</dt>
<dd><div class=" "><p>by <em>Miguel de Cervantes</em></p>
<p>I read the first half of this wonderful classic in 2014; the second half followed in 2015. This is a consistently wonderfully written—and translated—classic that deserves to be one. Does it sometimes get repetitive? Is it, at times, a pastiche of whatever Cervantes happened to be writing about? Does it feel amazingly modern, considering it was written in the late 16th and early 17 centuries? Yes to all. I don&rsquo;t know to whom I could recommend reading a gigantic classic text of this kind, but if you at all think it might be for you, you shouldn&rsquo;t be disappointed.</p>
<p>I&rsquo;ve included <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3035">notes, citations and errata</a> in a separate post.</p>
</div></dd>
<dt class="field">Spider-Man: Ends of the Earth (2012)</dt>
<dd><div class=" "><p>This story pits Spider-Man against Doctor Octopus. Octopus is dying but he has gathered the Sinister Six and equipped them with a lot of technology that makes them much more dangerous. Spider-Man is not really Spider-Man anymore, not like the Spider-Man of the 20th century. He has a high-tech job, all the money he needs, he&rsquo;s an Avenger, he no longer has a worry in the world. He&rsquo;s changed. He wears high-tech armor, he flies around with rocket boots, he&rsquo;s more like Iron Man than Spider-Man. In the first six books, he shot his webs once. The dialogue is flat, stilted and pathetic. Most of it reads like jingoistic propaganda—Sabra fights for Israel! Kangaroo fights for Australia! Union Jack for the U.K.! This is much worse than I remember. It&rsquo;s about on par with the writing in the <em>Civil War</em> series: no nuance and just Libertarian or black/white/good/bad claptrap.</p>
<p>For example: Sabra says at one point, <span class="quote-inline">&ldquo;I&rsquo;m not sure accepting this job counts as &ldquo;smart.&rdquo; But if it will save Israelis, I accept it.&rdquo;</span> When she is shot in the head by something names &ldquo;Crossbones&rdquo;, he is described as a <span class="quote-inline">&ldquo;Brutal Assassin [who] enjoys sandwiches.&rdquo;</span></p>
<p>Then there&rsquo;s Union Jack, who says that <span class="quote-inline">&ldquo;[p]art of the reason I ride this old Triumph motorbike [is that it&rsquo;s] British workmanship from way back when we <em>had</em> workmanship.&rdquo;</span></p>
<p>This is just before he&rsquo;s attacked by someone called &ldquo;Slaymaster MK II&rdquo;. What the hell is that? That&rsquo;s a stupid hero name, a name for the Unreal games, a name for the Pokemon generation. And the cast of shitty characters just keeps on coming: GoGo Tomago, Everwraith, it&rsquo;s just awful. This is just lazy writing. It&rsquo;s not funny or piquant, as Spider-Man used to be. Mysterio and Chameleon are the only ones with anything approaching humorous banter. Not recommended.</p>
</div></dd>
<dt class="field">The Long Earth (2013)</dt>
<dd><div class=" "><p>by <em>Terry Pratchett and Stephen Baxter</em></p>
<p>This is the story of a near-future Earth where alternate universes are just a “step” away. Each is a complete Earth, most of which are almost entirely unpopulated. Some people can step with a gadget, others without one and others can&rsquo;t step at all, remaining &ldquo;trapped&rdquo; on the mainline Earth. The story introduces this situation, provides some examples and then sends Joshua—a natural stepper—on an adventure far up the long line of Earths, accompanied by an AI named Lobsang. As usual, Baxter&rsquo;s parts are technologically solid, but immediately recognizable for his wooden characterizations. Similarly, Pratchett&rsquo;s style shines through in a few lovely, though shorter, chapters. It was good fun; recommended. </p>
<p>I&rsquo;ve included <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3087">notes, citations and errata</a> in a separate post.</p>
</div></dd>
<dt class="field">Snuff (2012)</dt>
<dd><div class=" "><p>by <em>Terry Pratchett</em></p>
<p>The vampires, the dwarves and the trolls of Discworld all had their liberation stories. This is the story of how the goblins of Discworld came to be accepted into society. The goblins show their penchant for creation and technology and are taken up in the clacks network. Vimes is on vacation at his wife&rsquo;s ancestral home, of which he is technically the Lord. He of course has nothing in common with the self-styled aristocrats who are horrible, horrible racists and scheming bastards, trading in goblin slaves. This would all be worked out in the end in a rollicking Discworld story worthy of standing with Pratchett&rsquo;s best. Recommended.</p>
<p>I&rsquo;ve included <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3088">notes, citations and errata</a> in a separate post.</p>
</div></dd>
<dt class="field">Game of Thrones (1996)</dt>
<dd><div class=" "><p>by <em>George R.R. Martin</em></p>
<p>This is book one of the <em>Song of Ice and Fire</em>.</p>
<p>Oh my goodness, where to begin? I&rsquo;m not sure that there&rsquo;s any point in summarizing a plot or in listing characters. This is a very tightly and well-written novel with a lot of lovely description, interesting characters, dozens of locations and storylines, all expertly interweaved and laid out by Mr. Martin. This first novel sets things up quite nicely, staying well-paced and interesting while introducing many of the characters that will accompany us through the next 5000 pages (so far—two more books to go).</p>
<p>The span and breadth of his vision are breathtaking—as is the execution. Martin’s writing style is perfectly suited to this genre. Though I’d heard that some of his prose was a bit long-winded, focused too much on loving and languorous descriptions of food, I found it to be quite tightly written and easy reading. In fairness, I read this book after having read a lot of nineteenth-century literature, so perhaps I was better prepared than most.</p>
<p>Summary: Ned Stark is in King&rsquo;s Landing, but not for long. Robb Stark starts to raise the North. Jon is on the Wall, Daenarys gives birth a few times.</p>
<p>I&rsquo;ve included <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3036">notes, citations and errata</a> in a separate post.</p>
</div></dd>
<dt class="field">Clash of Kings (1999)</dt>
<dd><div class=" "><p>by <em>George R.R. Martin</em></p>
<p>This is book two of the <em>Song of Ice and Fire</em>. It continues the story begun in <em>Game of Thrones</em>. It takes us up to the Battle of Blackwater Bay, Jon&rsquo;s foray into the North as a ranger and Daenarys&rsquo;s departure from Qarth.</p>
</div></dd>
<dt class="field">Watchmen (1986–1987)</dt>
<dd><div class=" "><p>by <em>Alan Moore</em></p>
<p>These comic books are about the history of a troupe of self-nominated heroes from the 1930s up until the present-day of the late 1980s, when the world is threatened by nuclear conflict. In that, author Alan Moore crafted a world that only slightly diverged from reality. That is, it was close enough to be familiar and not require any explanation, but divergent enough to be fascinating. Part-time narrator and uncompromising literalist Rorschach stole the show, unable to understand how the solution to the world’s greatest problem could be rooted in an even bigger lie. Recommended.</p>
<p>I&rsquo;ve included <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3082">notes, citations and errata</a> in a separate post.</p>
</div></dd>
<dt class="field">A Storm of Swords (2000)</dt>
<dd><div class=" "><p>by <em>George R.R. Martin</em></p>
<p>This is book three of the <em>Song of Ice and Fire</em>. This one takes us up to the Red Wedding, follows Arya and her adventures with Beric Dondarrion as well as The Hound, finds Tyrion naming the Red Viper as his champion against The Mountain, and sees us through to his bloody escape. Jon rises in the ranks at the Wall (quite far) and Daenerys conquers in the East, stopping in Meereen to rule for a time.</p>
<p>I&rsquo;ve included <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3084">notes, citations and errata</a> in a separate post.</p>
</div></dd>
</dl><p><hr></p>
<div class="footnote-reference"><span id="footnote_DRAFTABLE_ENTRY_3068_1_body" class="footnote-number">[1]</span> Sedaris would eventually have part of the highway named after him for efforts spanning several years.</div><div class="footnote-reference"><span id="footnote_DRAFTABLE_ENTRY_3068_2_body" class="footnote-number">[2]</span> Yep. It was his last. RIP Sir Terry.</div>      </div>
      </div>
        <div class="footer">
    <div class="footer-data"><div class="footer-links"><ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/contact.php" title="">Contact</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/support.php" title="">Support</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/privacy.php" title="">Privacy</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/rights.php" title="">Rights</a></li></ul></div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="copyright">Copyright (c) 1999-2026 earthli.com. All Rights Reserved.</div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="versions">Powered by <ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore/app_news.php">earthli News 3.7</a></li><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore" title="">earthli WebCore&trade; 3.7</a></li></ul></div></div>    </div>
      </div>
  </div>  </body>
</html>
]]>
  </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
      <title type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[Austerity: The History of a Dangerous Idea by Mark Blyth (read in 2015)]]>
  </title>
    <id>https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3136</id>
    <link href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3136"/>
    <updated>2015-05-17T11:33:03+02:00</updated>
    <author>
        <name type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[Marco von Ballmoos]]>
  </name>
      <uri>https://earthli.com/users/marco</uri>
    </author>
      <summary type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<blockquote class="quote abstract "><div>Disclaimer: these are notes I took while reading this book. They include citations I found interesting or enlightening or particularly well-written. In some cases, I&rsquo;ve pointed out which of these applies to which citation; in others, I have not. Any benefit you gain from reading these notes is... [<a class="complete-text-link" href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3136">More</a>]</div></blockquote>]]>
  </summary>
      <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<html lang="en">
  <head>
    <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/themes/ice.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/fonts/raleway.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/core/medium.css">
  </head>
  <body>
<div class="style-controls">  <div class="page">
    <div class="page-body">
<div class="info-box-top">
<p>
Published by <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_user.php?name=marco" title="Marco von Ballmoos" class="visible">marco</a> on <span class="date-time">17. May 2015 11:33:03 (GMT-5)</span>
</p>
</div>
      <div class="text-flow wide">
  <blockquote class="quote abstract "><div>Disclaimer: these are notes I took while reading this book. They include citations I found interesting or enlightening or particularly well-written. In some cases, I&rsquo;ve pointed out which of these applies to which citation; in others, I have not. Any benefit you gain from reading these notes is purely incidental to the purpose they serve of reminding me what I once read. Please see Wikipedia for a summary if I&rsquo;ve failed to provide one sufficient for your purposes. If my notes serve to trigger an interest in this book, then I&rsquo;m happy for you.</div></blockquote><p>This excellent book provides an approachable analysis of the recent history of the financial crisis that started in 2006, exploded in 2008 and is still being sorely felt by many in 2015. Blyth skewers the main idea for solving the crisis: austerity for the majority of the public. Why is austerity not the solution? He lists many reasons, but the main one is that it doesn&rsquo;t work. It has never worked. Accurate histories show that it doesn&rsquo;t work. Inaccurate studies claim that it might work.</p>
<p>Worse, the crisis was caused by private machinations and profit-taking and the price is paid by the public—who&rsquo;ve already paid the price in the form of a severely impacted economy. The public pays twice for the <del>mistakes</del>crimes of the few, while the few take their profit, take no punishment and line themselves up for the next reaping.</p>
<p>How do they get away with it? By selling the idea of austerity of all: if <em>our</em> economy tanked, then it must be our <em>collective</em> fault and we must <em>all</em> shoulder the blame and <em>tighten our belts</em>. The private losses are bailed out by the state and instantly transformed into a story of state profligacy. It&rsquo;s like a child who crashes his car, gets his father to buy him a new one, then mocks said father for not being able to pay the rent.</p>
<p>Never mind that it is exactly these <em>jackasses</em> who aren&rsquo;t tightening their belts—we can&rsquo;t police everyone, can we? Never mind that exactly those who aren&rsquo;t tightening their belts are actually the ones who caused the problems in the first place. With their <em>crimes</em>. Some will argue that what happened was perfectly legal—but that is only because those who commit crimes at high levels are careful to ensure that the crimes they wish to commit are first made legal.</p>
<p>This is an important book. Blyth cover the minutiae of recent history, covers the history of austerity over the last century, examines the writings and recommendations of oft-cited and great economists of the past—Locke, Hume, Smith, Keynes, among others—and looks at recent academic studies that are clearly if not deliberately fraudulent. He is a bit cagey about coming right out and accusing world leaders of collusion and corruption to serve their rich buddies and financial partners, but we can excuse an academic a bit of hedging. See below for my <a href="#less-generous-analysis">less-generous analysis</a> and <a href="#idea-for-solution">Blyth&rsquo;s possible solutions</a>.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;When world leaders keen to legitimize the damage that they have already done to the lives of millions of their fellow citizens reach for examples such as these to vindicate their actions, applauding these countries for creating misery, it shows us one this above all. Austerity remains an ideology immune to facts and basic empirical refutation.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 226</div></div><h2>Citations</h2><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;What changed was of course the global financial crisis of 2007–2008 that rumbles along in a new form today. The cost of bailing, recapitalizing, and otherwise saving the global banking system has been, depending on , as we shall see later, how you count it, between 3 and 13 trillion dollars. Most of that has ended up on the balance sheets of governments as they absorb the costs of the bust, which is why we mistakenly call this a sovereign debt crisis when in fact it is a transmuted and well-camouflaged banking crisis.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 5</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;This is, as we shall see over the next two chapters, why all of Europe needs to be austere, because each national state&rsquo;s balance sheet has to act as a shock absorber for the entire system. Having already bailed out the banks, we have to make sure that there is room on the public balance sheet to backstop them. That&rsquo;s why we have austerity. It&rsquo;s still all about saving the banks.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 7</div></div><p>Or, more precisely: having already used up an entire buffer to save the banks, we have to cut corners everywhere else in order to build up enough of a buffer to be able to save them <em>again</em> when the time comes, which it certainly will. That is, it&rsquo;s not about saving the banks (present tense) but about being able to save the banks again (future, not subjunctive tense, because it&rsquo;s certainly going to happen).</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;There is no crisis of sovereign debt caused b sovereigns&rsquo; spending unless you take account of actual spending and continuing liabilities caused by the rupture of national banking systems. What begins as a banking crisis ends with a banking crisis, even it if goes through the states&rsquo; accounts. But there is a politics of making it appear to be the states&rsquo; fault such that those who made the bust don&rsquo;t have to pay for it. Austerity is not just the price of saving the  banks. It&rsquo;s the price that the banks want someone else to pay.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 7</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Since there are usually more debtors than creditors at any given time, and since creditors are by definition people with money to lend, democracy has, according to some, an inflationary bias. The politics of cutting inflation therefore take of [sic] the form of restoring the &ldquo;real&rdquo; value of money by pushing the inflation rate down through &ldquo;independent&rdquo; (from the rest of us) central banks. Creditors win, debtors lose. One can argue about the balance of benefits, but it&rsquo;s still a class-specific tax.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 9</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;In essence, democracy, and the redistributions it makes possible, is a form of asset insurance for the rich, and yet, through austerity, we find that those with the most assets are skipping on the insurance payments.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 14</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>"We have spent too much&rdquo; those at the top say, rather blithely ignoring the fact that this &ldquo;spending&rdquo; was the cost of saving their assets with the public purse. Meanwhile, those at the bottom are being told to &ldquo;tighten their belts&rdquo; by people who are wearing massively larger pants and who show little interest in contributing to the cleanup.</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 15</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;You can blame regulators for being lax or negligent and politicians for caving to banking interests all you like, but this was a quintessentially private-sector crisis, and it was precisely how you get a multi-billion-dollar financial panic out of a bunch of defaulting mortgages. But it was not yet sufficient to cause a global crisis. To get there, you have to understand how the structure of these mortgage securities combined with unbacked insurance policies called &ldquo;credit default swaps&rdquo; (CDSs) [1] to produce a &ldquo;correlation bomb&rdquo; that spread the repo [2] market crisis into the global banking system. Again, this had nothing to do with states and their supposedly profligate spending habits and everything to do with weaknesses internal to the private sector.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 26</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;With a decade of house-price increases telling everyone that house prices only go up, and with these new mortgage derivatives seemingly eliminating a correlation problem that was deemed small to being with and was now insurable with a CDS, you could almost being to believe that you had what bankers call a &ldquo;free option&rdquo;: an asset with zero downside and a potentially unlimited upside, and one that is rated AAA by the ratings agencies. The fact that many investment funds are legally required to hold a specific proportion of their assets as AAA securities pumped demand still further.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 29</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Repo runs can start it, and derivatives can amplify it, but to be truly blindsided by a crisis of this magnitude you need to have a theory of risk that denies that catastrophic events can happen in the first place, and then leave it entirely to the self-interested private sector to manage that risk. Unfortunately, almost the entire global financial system worked with just such a theory of risk management.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 31</div></div><p><span id="less-generous-analysis"></span>The last sentence here betrays a writing style—and thinking style—that presumes innocence in the face of a tremendous amount of evidence to the contrary. Blyth is not a prosecutor and has no obligation to avoid the obvious hypothesis that the entire financial system did exactly this because it allowed them to capitalize on massive short-term gains while letting the rest of the world clean up the mess. His formulation leaves the door open to them just having fooled themselves into thinking that a good thing could last forever. They didn&rsquo;t fool <em>themselves</em>. They knew it was bullshit. But if they could convince everyone else that it <em>wasn&rsquo;t</em> bullshit, they could get away with some massive short-terms gains before the whole game blew up, they pulled up stakes and got the hell out of dodge. A classic con, no more, no less. Just at a global scale.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Like the proverbial drunk looking for his keys only under the lamppost, we are drawn to see the &ldquo;normal&rdquo; distributions in decidedly nonnormal worlds because that is where we find the light.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 37</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The flaw in the logic was once again the expectation that the whole cannot be different from its component parts, that the denial of fallacies of composition haunts us once again. The neoclassical insistence on grounding everything in the micro suggested that if you make the parts safe (individual banks armed with the right risk models), then you make the whole (banking system) safe. But it turned out that the whole was quite different from the sum of its parts because the interaction of the parts produced outcomes miles away from the expectation of the instruction sheet, a sheet that was quite wrong about the world in the first place.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 43</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;I hope this demonstrates that any narrative that locates wasteful spending by governments prior to 2007 as the <em>cause</em> of the crsis is more than just simply wrong; it is disingenuous and partisan. In fact, average OECD debt before the crisis was doing down, not up. What happened was banks promised growth, delivered losses, passed the cost on to the state, and then the state got the blame for generating the debt, and the crisis, in the first place, which of course, must be paid for by expenditure cuts. The banks may have made the losses, but the citizenry will pay for them. This is a pattern we see repeatedly in the crisis.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 47</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;Maybe the $13 trillion coast to date was a price worth paying? Perhaps. But only if the costs had been shared according to both ability to pay and responsibility for the bust, but they were not.</p>
<p>&ldquo;As we shall see in the next chapter, what was a private-sector banking crisis was rechristened by political and financial elites as a crisis of sovereign state in a matter of months. […] Europe usually sits to the left of the United states politically, but it was acting far to its right economically by mid-2010.&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 49</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The ideal policy back in 2009 would have cost around 50 billion euros. It would have required either the ECB, or Germany as its major creditor, to buy the secondary-market Greek debt that was subject to near-term rollover risk, bury it somewhere deep in its balance sheet, and walk away. Why didn&rsquo;t they do so? One answer lies in German politics. There was a regional election coming up in Germany, and it was politically easier to blame the Greeks for being feckless than it was to explain to the German public that the ECB needed to bail them out for reasons of systemic risk. [3] The other answer lies in the ECB statutes that forbid one country to bail out another for fear of generating moral hazard.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 64</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Fearing financial Armageddon, the Irish government issued a blanket guarantee for the entire banking system&rsquo;s liabilities, and that 400 percent of assets as GDP on the private sector&rsquo;s balance sheet very suddenly became the Irish public&rsquo;s problem.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 66</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Ireland and Spain were quintessential private-sector-housing-cum-banking crises, governed by states more fiscally prudent than Germany, where the risks were socialized while the profits were privatized. In all cases, private-sector weaknesses ended up creating public-sector liabilities that European publics now have to pay for with austerity programs that make the situation worse rather than better. The fiscal crisis in all these countries was the <em>consequence</em> of the financial crisis washing up on their shores, <em>not its cause</em>. To say it is the cause is to deliberately, and politically, confuse cause and effect.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 73</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Just as in 2008, these banks were borrowing overnight to fund loans over much longer periods.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 85</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;recall that in the United States in 2008, the collateral being posted for repo borrowing began to lose value. As such, the firms involved had to post more collateral to borrow the same amount of money, or they ran out of liquidity real fast, which is what happened to the US banking system. The same thing began to happen in Europe. While mortgage-backed securities, the collateral of choice for US borrowers in the US repo markets, were AAA-rated, for European borrowers in London the collateral of choice was AAA-rated European sovereign debt. Just as US borrowers needed a substitute for  T-bills and turned to AAA mortgage bonds, so European borrowers had too-few nice, safe German bonds to pledge as collateral since the core banks were busy dumping them for periphery debt. So they began to pledge the periphery debt they had purchased en masse, which was, after all, rated almost the same, an policy that was turbocharged by a EC directive that &ldquo;established that the bonds of Eurozone sovereigns would be treated equally in repo transactions&rdquo; in order to build more liquid European markets. By 2008, PIIGS debt was collateralizing 25 percent of all European repo transactions. You can begin to see the problem.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 85</div></div><p>From a hypothetical letter to the Voting Public:</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;The entire economy is in recession, people are paying back their debts, and no one is borrowing. This causes prices to fall, thus making the banks even more impaired and economy ever more sclerotic. This is literally nothing we can do about this. We need to keep the banks solvent or they collapse, and they are so big and interconnected that even one of them going down could blow up the whole system. As awful as austerity is, it&rsquo;s nothing compared to a general collapse of the financial system, really.</p>
<p>&ldquo;So we can&rsquo;t inflate and pass the cost on to savers, we can&rsquo;t devalue and pass the cost on to foreigners, and we can&rsquo;t default without killing ourselves, so we need to deflate, for as long as it takes to get the balance sheets of these banks into some kind of sustainable shape. This is why we can&rsquo;t let anyone out of the euro. If the Greeks, for example, left the euro,we might be able to weather i, since most banks have managed to sell on their Greek assets. But you can&rsquo;t sell on Italy. There&rsquo;s too much of it. The contagion risk would destroy everyone&rsquo;s banks. So the only policy tool we have to stabilize the system is for everyone to deflate against Germany, which is a really hard thing to do even in the best of times. it&rsquo;s horrible, but there it is. Your unemployment will save the banks, and in the process save the sovereigns who cannot save the banks themselves, and thus save the euro. We, the political classes of Europe, would like to thank you for your sacrifice.&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 89–90</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;It turns out that cross-border borrowing in euros is, when bond markets reflect true risk premiums, just like borrowing in a foreign currency, with the result that banks increasingly want to match local loans with local assets. Although there is no exchange-rate risk to cover, if your sovereign&rsquo;s yields go up and your parent economy deflates, then your ability to pay back your loans declines as if you were making payments in a depreciating currency.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 91</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;There was of course a worry that some states may not follow the rules, so more rules were put in place. But there was never much attention paid to the possibility that private actors, such as banks, would behave badly. Yet this is exactly what happened, and the EU is still blaming sovereigns, tying them down with new rules, and insisting that this will solve the problem. We can but think again about the old adage that drinks only look for their keys under the lamppost because that&rsquo;s where the light is.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 92</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;However, as Karl Polanyi noted at the end of World War II, there is nothing natural about markets. Turning people into wage laborers, securing the private ownership of land, even inventing capital and preserving its monetary form are all deeply political projects that involve courts, regulation, enforcement, bureaucracy, and all the rest. Indeed, gaining control of the state by the merchant class was a defining feature of early capitalism.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 99</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;As Locke argued, &ldquo;whatsoever then he removes out of eh state [of]  nature…[and] mixed his labor with…[he] thereby makes it his property.&rdquo; Now, you might think that other folks at the time would object to someone taking possession of the common land this way. But Locke insists that, &ldquo;the taking of this or that part [of land] does not depend on the express consent of all the commoners&rdquo; because &ldquo;there was still enough [for all] and as good left.&rdquo;</p>
<p>&ldquo;Having dispatched the problem of distribution by assuming infinite abundance, Locke maintains that the only real argument against private property is the issue of spoilage, that more is taken than can be used, which God would not like. Luckily, then, time and habits have given us a device called money that allows us to get over the problem of spoilage because we can store money and swap it for consumables at any given time.&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 105</div></div><p>I&rsquo;m assuming that Blyth&rsquo;s tongue was planted firmly in his cheek when writing the last sentence.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;For Hume, merchants are the catalyst for trade and the creators of wealth. They are, according to Hume, &ldquo;one of the most useful races of men, who serve as agents between …parts of the state.&rdquo; As a consequence, &ldquo;it is necessary, and reasonable, that a considerable part of the commodities and labor [produced] should belong to the merchant, to whom, in great measure, they are owing.&rdquo; While &ldquo;lawyers and physicians beget no industry,&rdquo; only merchants can &ldquo;encrease industry, and by also increasing frugality, give a great command of that industry to particular members of society.&rdquo; Those &ldquo;particular members of society&rdquo; would, of course, be Hume and those like him: the merchant classes.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 107</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;For [Adam] Smith, the act of saving drives investment, not consumption. Why? Because the wealth of the nation is its total income. Take what is used for the reproduction of labor (wages) out of this income, and what is left is profit. Profits are then reinvested in the economy via merchants&rsquo; savings, which are lent out to the productive members of society (other merchants) to invest. Today we call this supply-side economics. Investment both drives consumption and makes consumption possible—not the other way around. Because of this &ldquo;the greater part of it [income] will naturally be destined for the employment of industry.&rdquo; Underlying this worldview is a particularly Scottish psychology that is worth unpacking because it suggests why the idea of austerity has such <em>moral</em> force, even today.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 111</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Most interestingly, [Smith] is disarmingly honest concerning the political effects of capitalism, noting that &ldquo;wherever there is property there is great inequality,&rdquo; such that &ldquo; the acquisition of valuable and extensive property…necessarily requires the establishment of civil government.&rdquo; A civil government that, &ldquo; in so far as it is instituted for the security of property, is in reality instituted for the defense of the rich against the poor, or of those who have some property against those who have none at all.&rdquo;&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 112</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;First, [Keynes] showed that although any worker can accept a wage cut to price himself into employment, if all workers did this, it would in the aggregate lower consumption and prices, and thus increase the real wage (the wage-minus-price effects), leaving the worker who &ldquo;adjusted&rdquo; poorer and just as unemployed. Second, he showed that under conditions of uncertainty about the future, it is irrational for any investor to invest rather than sit on cash, with the result that if investors look to each other for signals about what to do, they all sit on cash and no one will invest. Thus we bring about, by out collective self-interested actions, the very depression we are individually trying to avoid.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 127</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;In this world spending, and with it debt, <em>especially by the government</em>, becomes good policy. Individual saving as a virtue, in contrast, falls to the paradox of thrift: if we all save (the very definition of austerity), we all fail together as the economy shrinks form want of demand.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 128</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Most importantly for Schumpeter, this scale-shift takes a cultural toll. Whereas in the past &ldquo;the rugged individualism of Galileo was the individualism of the rising capitalist class&rdquo;, today, technology and bureaucracy have together removed the possibilities for such individuals to thrive. As he laments, &ldquo;the capitalist process rationalizes behavior and ideas and by doing so chases from our minds…metaphysical belief&rdquo; such that &ldquo;economic progress becomes depersonalized and automatized.&rdquo; When large firms take over production it is not the entrepreneur&rsquo;s income that is replaced. After all, he gets shares in these new conglomerates. Rather, his social function is made redundant, &ldquo;the stock exchange [being] a poor substitute for the holy grail&rdquo; This may lead to a material progress, to more consumption and all that Keynes thinks important, but it is for Schumpeter a morally empty future. It is also one that invites jealousy from the lower orders who, led on by classes of functionless left-leaning intellectual who resent capitalism, have become accustomed to ever-rising standards of living and can no longer accept the dislocations of the market. Thus, the disorder of the previous decades is little more than the inability of the spoiled masses to accept necessary adjustments.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 130</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;If Schumpeter reminds you of Ayn Rand&rsquo;s character John Galt, he should: he&rsquo;s cut from the same conservative cloth. And, as in Galt&rsquo;s long speech at the end of <em>Atlas Shrugged</em>, what started as a robust defense of economic liberalism ends up being a weak retreat from it. With the Keynesian view ascendant, conservatives like Schumpeter had a choice: admit that they were wrong (or at least accommodate themselves to the new ideas that seemed to fit the facts better than the old ones) or find something else to talk about. Schumpeter chose the latter path, and so he spoke about the death of saving, the end of family virtue, and the triumph of bureaucracy.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 130–131</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Especially when parliaments get involved, elements of the administrative order can be captured by the most powerful members of the transactional order, hence the fear of cartels and private power.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 136</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;In the case of Greece and Italy, if that meant deposing a few democratically elected governments, then so be it.</p>
<p>&ldquo;[…] The basic objection made by late-developing states, such as the countries of East Asia, to the Washington Consensus/Anglo-American idea &ldquo;liberalize and then growth follows&rdquo; was twofold. First, this understanding mistakes the outcomes of growth, stable public finances, low inflation, cost competitiveness, and so on, for the causes of growth. second, the liberal path to growth only makes sense if you are an early developer, since you have no competitors—<em>pace</em> the United Kingdom in the eighteenth century and the United States in the nineteenth century. Yet in the contemporary world, development is almost always state led.&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 142</div></div><p>Blyth references Ha-Joon Chang&rsquo;s <em>Kicking Away the Ladder</em> in a footnote, but it seems to me that he either mis-stated or at least failed to emphasize the full point. He got the first half right: liberalization of an economy <em>before</em> it is on at least somewhat equal footing with potential competitors or trade partners is a fool&rsquo;s game that benefits only those competitors or trade partners. The second point that Chang made was that neither Britain nor the US did this either during their own buildup. In fact, they were both highly protectionist, despite there being no real competition, as Blyth notes. Chang would go on to show that every economy considered great today started off extremely protectionist and gradually dropped trade barriers and increased liberalization only after it knew it would be the primary beneficiary of such policies.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Suitably incentivized, entrepreneurs hire more people and buy more materials, which pushes up prices and wages. This produces a classic short-run monetary stimulus effect that beings to show up in rising prices, particularly asset prices, which encourages still more borrowing. The underlying economy, however, has not changed. There is simply more money chasing fewer goods: an inflation. Realizing their error, banks now stand to make losses, so they do everything they can to not realize those losses. They extend more credit, lower interest rates further, and generally kick the can down the road.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 146</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Companies may be sitting on piles of ash and not investing, but the recession is no, as Keynes would have you  believe, the capitalists&rsquo; fault. Rather, investors are quite reasonably covering the risk of backdoor expropriation by the state through inflation or devaluation. The fear of the state taking away your property—the original liberal nightmare—rears its head once more. Instead, &ldquo;public opinion is perfectly right to see the crisis…as the consequence of the policy of the banks&rdquo; Consequently, the sum of the Austrian view is that we should have let the banks fail and the restart the system.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 148</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;One of America&rsquo;s Great Depression-era monetary economists, Irving Fisher, analyzed how, much to his dismay, depressions do not in fact &ldquo;right themselves&rdquo; owing to a phenomenon called <em>debt inflation</em>. Simply put, as the economy deflates, debts increase as incomes shrink, making it harder to pay off debt the more the economy craters. This, in turn, causes consumption to shrink, which in the aggregate pulls the economy down further and makes the debt to be paid back all the greater.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 150</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;It&rsquo;s a great instruction sheet—so long as you are indeed the late-developing, high-savings, high-technology, and export-driven economy in question. If you are not, as the periphery of the Eurozone is finding out, then it&rsquo;s a one-way ticket to permanent austerity.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 151</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;As a consequence, policy making should be delegated away from democratically elected politicians to independent conservative central bankers who will dish out the bad medicine when required because their jobs do not depend upon pleasing constituents—except, perhaps, their constituents in the financial sector who benefit from ultralow inflation […]</p>
<p>&ldquo;[…]</p>
<p>&ldquo;Their evidentiary basis, however, was another matter entirely. The fact that these theories rest upon incredibly narrow operational premises and have scant evidence going for them is beside the point. That they are highly effective policy rhetorics that only narrow the menu of choice for governments is what matters.&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 157–158</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;Similarly, the notion that unemployment is voluntary is, in the context of the current self-inflicted wound in Europe, downright offensive. Real workers must pay bills and feed families from jobs that have fixed hours and fixed wage rates. The idea that workers &ldquo;trade off&rdquo; labor against leisure by figuring out the real wage rate and then slacking off or going on an indefinite unpaid leave is the type of thinking that leads us to see the Great Depression as a giant, unexpected, and astonishingly long unpaid vacation for millions of people: original, yes; helpful no.</p>
<p>&ldquo;Public choice theory, like any universal gizmo, has not only helped revolutionize the institutional relationship between voters, politicians, and bankers in democratic societies, it has become, as Daniel Dennett said about evolution in <em>Darwin&rsquo;s Dangerous Idea</em>, the &ldquo;universal acid&rdquo; that eats away everything it touches by turning everything into a principal-agent/rent-seeking problem.&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 159</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;What Karl Polanyi once said about the failed ideas of an earlier era also rings true in this instance: by the standards of the IMF, the Washington Consensus&rsquo;s &ldquo;spectacular failure…did not destroy its authority at all. Indeed, its partial eclipse may have even strengthened its hold since it enabled its defenders to argue that the incomplete application of its principles was the reason for every and any difficulty laid to its charge.&rdquo; Once again, when it comes to austerity, mere facts seldom get in the way of a good ideology. And a good ideology, in the absence of supporting facts, can always supply a few good models to generate those facts when needed.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 165</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Alesina and Ardagna being by noting that the ballooning of debts and deficits across the OECD is due in large part to the &ldquo;bailout[s] of various types in the financial sector.&rdquo; However, about this they &ldquo;have nothing to say&rdquo;. What they do have to say is that regardless of how we got into this mess, the only way out is through cutting the state.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 173</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Austerity&rsquo;s continuing application may well result in the eventual breakup of the Eurozone and have political repercussions that the weak institutions of the EU are unlikely to withstand.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 176</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;As Fred Block put it with justified irony, &ldquo;The American contribution to…the problem was to lend Germany huge sums of capital, which were then used to finance reparations payments.&rdquo; If you think this sounds a little like continually giving the European periphery loans that those countries can never hope to pay back because of their already high debt burdens, again, you would not be completely wrong.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 185</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Given the relatively large size of the US domestic economy, increasing domestic demand was bound to have a significant effect. Second, as a consequence, the net effect of Roosevelt&rsquo;s policies was to increase government spending and debt while bringing unemployment down to 17 percent by 1936. No good dead goes unpunished, of course, and this turnaround in the economy by late 1936 created demands for a return to balanced budgets, sound finance, and America&rsquo;s second round of austerity in 1937.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 188</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;So when Churchill put Britain back on gold in 1925, the domestic economy was quite deliberately going to be squeezed so that the value of sterling and, not coincidentally, the profits of finance, would be maintained.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 189</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The currency depreciation that getting off gold facilitated helped restore exports, but with the Treasury view of the economy still dominant, Britain continued to stagnate with endemic high unemployment until rearmament, the crudest form of stimulus, created the conditions for recovery. Inflation, the great fear of the rentier class, never appeared. Never once did austerity help.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 191</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;In Vienna in 2009, and long before any Greek or Irish bailout, an agreement was signed between the Western banks, the troika (EU-IMF-EC), and Romania, Hungary, and Latvia that committed Western European banks to keeping their funds in their Eastern European banks <em>if these governments committed to austerity to stabilize local banks&rsquo; balance sheets</em>. The Vienna agreement prevented the liquidity crunch from spreading to the rest of the REBLLS, so long as the same balance-sheet guarantee (austerity) was applied elsewhere—and it was. Once again, it was all about saving the banks, and the bill for doing so, in the form of austerity, high interest rates, unemployment, and the rest, was dumped once again on the public sector balance sheet of the states concerned.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 221</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Let&rsquo;s stop for a moment and take this all in. A set of patently unsustainable and unstable economies financed by foreign credit bubbles blew up, quite predictably, the minute there was a shock to these economies. These countries are now supposed to be the role models for the rest of the world to follow? Spain is in bad shape, certainly, but is it really supposed to hollow out its economy entirely and live off more foreign borrowed money? Is Italy supposed to abandon its competitive export sector and sell of its banks? That would be what &ldquo;following the example of the REBLLs&rdquo; actually means. In fact, these so-called &ldquo;models&rdquo; are little more than the worst features of Ireland, Spain, and Greece combined, with no compensatory airbags, a sideline in divide-and-rule ethnic politics, and a libertarian instruction sheet.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 222</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;When world leaders keen to legitimize the damage that they have already done to the lives of millions of their fellow citizens reach for examples such as these to vindicate their actions, applauding these countries for creating misery, it shows us one this above all. Austerity remains an ideology immune to facts and basic empirical refutation.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 226</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Part of what follows is a conjecture—the business model of investment banking may be dying. If so, all the money we spent and have lost in recession was wasted on a system that may be in terminal decline anyway.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 231</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;[…] deprived of fuel for the asset cycle, all those wonderful paper assets that can be based off these booms—commodity ETFs, interest rate swaps, CDOs and CDSs—to name but a few—will cease to be the great money machine that they have been to date. Having pumped and dumped every asset class on the planet, finance may have exhausted its own growth model. The banks&rsquo; business model for the past twenty-five years may be dying. If so, saving it in the bust is merely, and most expensively, prolonging the agony.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 234</div></div><p>But, most importantly, the purveyors of the dying business model are able to escape any negative effects of its death. Instead, those that never benefited from it in the first place will bear the cost of its funeral. The bankers have a win-win. They win while the public is still willing to be fleeced by the game, and they win when the public buys the next con: that the banks must be bailed or it will be worse for everyone.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Meanwhile, what growth there is seems to be on the retail rather than the investment banking side. But retail depends more directly on the real economy, which is shrinking because of austerity. In sum, we may have impoverished a few million people to save an industry of dubious social utility that is now on its last legs.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 234</div></div><p>I would strike &ldquo;dubious&rdquo; here.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Irish debt to GDP was 32 percent in 2007. Today it stands at 108.2 percent <em>after three years of austerity.</em> Indeed, if the cost of NAMA is added to the national accounts, Ireland&rsquo;s debt-to-GDP ratio would rival that of Greece. Ireland bailed its banks, and then banked on an export-led recovery without a devaluation that was based upon phantom exports that create very few jobs and that are only made possible by tax dodging. Apparently this is Greece&rsquo;s role model.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 237</div></div><p>NAMA is the National Asset Management Agency, which was formed to manage the debt burden of 4x GDP taken on by the Irish government when it agreed to bail out its banks for 100 cents on the dollar. The tax dodgers to which Blyth refers are American high-tech companies—primarily Google and Apple—that expatriate their profits in order to avoid paying US taxes.</p>
<p><span id="idea-for-solution"></span></p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;So we are talking taxes, which no one likes. But since I found out that in 2010 I paid more in taxes than the General Electric Corporation—really, I did, and so did you—I&rsquo;m willing to give financial repression a chance. Yes, it will greatly limit my opportunities to buy and trade exotic derivatives and engage in international financial arbitrage games, but you know what? I&rsquo;m willing to give it up. After thirty years of all the gains and all the tax guts going to the people you who brought us the bubble, payback is coming. Not because of Occupy Wall Street and not because of my personal preferences, but because it&rsquo;s so much easier and more effective to do than it is to enforce self-defeating austerity that it&rsquo;s bound to happen.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 241–242</div></div><p>I&rsquo;m afraid that while I share Blyth&rsquo;s sentiment, I don&rsquo;t share his confidence in the inevitability of repression, which is tax on captive bondholders. Under repression, bondholders are forced to hold on to their investments even when the interest rates are no longer satisfactory (or something very much like that). Essentially, it&rsquo;s a way of slowing down the hopping-around of the investor class and making them bear at least some of the brunt of downturns rather than letting their capital skip around willy-nilly, pulling in only positive results everywhere while letting someone else—read: the public—bear the costs. The concept is similar to the brake that would be exacted by a transaction tax—which would make hopping directly expensive—but people have been talking about something like that for four decades and the powers-that-be have so far mostly avoided it (except for some countries in Europe, which have it, and the EU as a whole, which is, at least, discussing….or was).</p>
<p><hr></p>
<div class="footnote-reference"><span id="footnote_DRAFTABLE_ENTRY_3136_1_body" class="footnote-number">[1]</span> <div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;If anything, it&rsquo;s the absence of the state in the repo markets that&rsquo;s worth commenting upon, since the absence of the state&rsquo;s guarantee of insurance explains the system&rsquo;s vulnerability to a bank run.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Endnote 10 on page 248</div></div></div><div class="footnote-reference"><span id="footnote_DRAFTABLE_ENTRY_3136_2_body" class="footnote-number">[2]</span> <div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;A CDS is called a swap but is actually quite different from most swaps. It was called a swap mostly to avoid regulations that would kick in it it were named what it really is, an insurance contract. Insurance requires reserves to be set aside, but swaps don&rsquo;t, which was a huge part of their problem.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Endnote 13 on page 248</div></div></div><div class="footnote-reference"><span id="footnote_DRAFTABLE_ENTRY_3136_3_body" class="footnote-number">[3]</span> <div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;[…] if everyone tries to become fully diversified, then, paradoxically, they will end up buying more or less the same assets, and using the same hedges to cover their exposures, which is what had happened by 2006. Their individual portfolios may be diversified even if the sum of those portfolios is not. This is why so-called systemic risk, which is in part the risk you cannot diversify, never really goes away.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Endnote 23 on page 249</div></div></div>      </div>
      </div>
        <div class="footer">
    <div class="footer-data"><div class="footer-links"><ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/contact.php" title="">Contact</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/support.php" title="">Support</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/privacy.php" title="">Privacy</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/rights.php" title="">Rights</a></li></ul></div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="copyright">Copyright (c) 1999-2026 earthli.com. All Rights Reserved.</div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="versions">Powered by <ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore/app_news.php">earthli News 3.7</a></li><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore" title="">earthli WebCore&trade; 3.7</a></li></ul></div></div>    </div>
      </div>
  </div>  </body>
</html>
]]>
  </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
      <title type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[The Handmaid's Tale by Margaret Atwood (read in 2015)]]>
  </title>
    <id>https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3134</id>
    <link href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3134"/>
    <updated>2015-05-17T11:04:43+02:00</updated>
    <author>
        <name type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[Marco von Ballmoos]]>
  </name>
      <uri>https://earthli.com/users/marco</uri>
    </author>
      <summary type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<blockquote class="quote abstract "><div>Disclaimer: these are notes I took while reading this book. They include citations I found interesting or enlightening or particularly well-written. In some cases, I&rsquo;ve pointed out which of these applies to which citation; in others, I have not. Any benefit you gain from reading these notes is... [<a class="complete-text-link" href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3134">More</a>]</div></blockquote>]]>
  </summary>
      <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<html lang="en">
  <head>
    <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/themes/ice.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/fonts/raleway.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/core/medium.css">
  </head>
  <body>
<div class="style-controls">  <div class="page">
    <div class="page-body">
<div class="info-box-top">
<p>
Published by <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_user.php?name=marco" title="Marco von Ballmoos" class="visible">marco</a> on <span class="date-time">17. May 2015 11:04:43 (GMT-5)</span>
</p>
</div>
      <div class="text-flow wide">
  <blockquote class="quote abstract "><div>Disclaimer: these are notes I took while reading this book. They include citations I found interesting or enlightening or particularly well-written. In some cases, I&rsquo;ve pointed out which of these applies to which citation; in others, I have not. Any benefit you gain from reading these notes is purely incidental to the purpose they serve of reminding me what I once read. Please see Wikipedia for a summary if I&rsquo;ve failed to provide one sufficient for your purposes. If my notes serve to trigger an interest in this book, then I&rsquo;m happy for you.</div></blockquote><p>The <em>Handmaid&rsquo;s Tale</em> is the story of a possible future America in which society has taken a rather hard, right turn into a dystopian, quasi-religious patriarchy—much more extreme even than what exists today. [1] In this world, women have no rights whatsoever. Some are used as drudges—Marthas—while others—Aunts—inculcate the new regime to the breeders—Handmaids—and, finally, there are the Wives. Among the men, the Commanders are at the top of the food chain—they are married to Wives—but also have a series of Handmaids. There are other men, high-ranking soldiers—Angels—as well as spies—Eyes.</p>
<p>The prose is poetic, evocative, metaphorical, at-times almost hallucinatory—as if the mists of recollection have twisted certain parts of the remembered past. The ideas and chilling visions are just as likely to happen as they were in the 80s, when the book was written. There are good portions of the American population who would happily view the book as a guide to revolution, to creating a better version of America. At times reminiscent of <em>Orwell&rsquo;s</em> <em>1984</em>. Highly recommended.</p>
<h2>Citations</h2><p>With such a strict regime in place, there is, of course, the necessity of keeping potential uprisings under control. The following passage is reminiscent of U.S. or Israeli justification for civilian deaths in their respective occupied territories.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Last week they shot a woman, right about here. She was a Martha. She was fumbling in her robe, for her pass, and they thought she was hunting for a bomb. They thought we was a man in disguise. There have been such incidents.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 30</div></div><p>The following passage depicts the main character&rsquo;s [2] thoughts about what the seriously under-serviced and over-brainwashed soldiers think when they see women. Instead of gratification, they think of the terror that would be visited on them, with only the carrot of very distantly eventual satisfaction in a dim, barely to-be-hoped-for future.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;But more likely they don&rsquo;t think in terms of clothing discarded on the lawn. If they think of a kiss, they must then think immediately of the floodlights going on, the rifle shots. They think instead of doing their duty and of promotion to the Angels, and of being allowed possibly to marry, and then, if they are able to gain enough power and live to be old enough, of being allotted a Handmaid of their own.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 32</div></div><p>The Aunts are in charge of indoctrination. Here, Lydia smugly teaches the women that the two freedoms she names are equal: as if a freedom conferred on you by another is any kind of freedom at all.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;There is more than one kind of freedom, said Aunt Lydia. Freedom to and freedom from. In the days of anarchy, it was freedom to. Now you are being given freedom from. Don&rsquo;t underrate it.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 34</div></div><p>This next citation is about doctors who performed abortions—this part rings the truest for parts of America today.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;These men, we&rsquo;ve been told, are like war criminals. It&rsquo;s no excuse that what they did was legal at the time: their crimes are retroactive. They have committed atrocities, and must be made into examples, for the rest. Though this is hardly needed. No woman in her right mind, these days, would seek to prevent a birth, should she be so lucky as to conceive.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 43</div></div><p>In this passage, we are offered a glimpse into a past where the patriarchal situation depicted in the book was initiated by revolutions in which the primarily women burned unacceptable books and magazines and other supposedly oppressive materials. Thirty years after the writing of this book and the <abbr title="Social Justice Warrior">SJW</abbr> movement is rushing in this direction, as if thought-suppression has ever amounted to anything good.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;The woman handed me one of the magazines. It had a pretty woman on it, with no clothes on, hanging from the ceiling by a chain wound around her hands. I looked at it with interest. It didn&rsquo;t frighten me. I thought she was swinging, like Tarzan from a vine, on the TV.</p>
<p>&ldquo;Don&rsquo;t let her <em>see</em> it, said my mother. Here, she said to me, toss it in, quick.</p>
<p>&ldquo;I threw the magazine into the flames. It riffled open in the wind of its burning; big flakes of paper came loose, sailed into the air, still on fire, parts of women&rsquo;s bodies, turning to black ash, in the air, before my eyes.&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 48</div></div><p>The Wife for whom Offred works is named Serena Joy, a former TV star who became a spokesperson for the male &ldquo;revolution&rdquo; quite early on. Here her depicted hypocrisy is typical of any politician: good for me but not for thee.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;Her speeches were about the sanctity of the home, about how women should stay home. Serena Joy didn&rsquo;t do this herself, she made speeches instead, but <strong>she presented this failure of hers as a sacrifice she was making for the good of all.</strong></p>
<p>&ldquo;Around that time, someone tried to shoot her and missed; […] Someone else planted a bomb in her care but it went off too early. Though some people said she&rsquo;s put the bomb in her own car, for sympathy. (Emphasis added.)&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 55</div></div><p>The roots of the patriarchy are deep—coming from today&rsquo;s society, there isn&rsquo;t that far to go. The following passages shows &ldquo;truths&rdquo; that are indoctrinated into the women by the Aunts in the first case, or by 18th-century painters in the second.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;I almost gasp: he&rsquo;d said a forbidden word. <em>Sterile.</em> There is no such thing as a sterile man any more, not officially. There are only women who are fruitful and women who are barren, that&rsquo;s the law.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 70</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;I remember walking in art galleries, through the nineteenth century: the obsession they had then with harems. Dozens of paintings of harems, fat women lolling on divans, turbans on their heads or velvet caps, being fanned with peacock tails, a eunuch in the backgrounds standing guard. Studies of sedentary flesh, painted by men who&rsquo;d never been there. These pictures were supposed to be erotic, and I thought they were, at the time; but I see now what they were really about. They were paintings about suspended animations; about waiting, about objects not in use. They were paintings about boredom.</p>
<p>&ldquo;But maybe boredom is erotic, when women do it, for men.&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 79</div></div><p>This next passage reminded me of the passages about Emmanuel Goldstein in <em>1984</em>. The stories about smuggling are very similar to those from that book, or even the myriad stories of terrorists sneaking back and forth across the oh-so-porous U.S. border. The Lackawanna Five or the Liberty City Seven come to mind.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;They show us only victories, never defeats. Who wants bad news?</p>
<p>&ldquo;Possibly [the rebel captive i]s an actor.</p>
<p>&ldquo;The anchorman comes on now. His manner is kindly, fatherly; he gazes out at us from the screen, looking, with his tan and his white hair and candid eyes, wise wrinkles around them, like everybody&rsquo;s ideal grandfather. What he&rsquo;s telling us, his level smile implies, is for our own good. Everything will be all right soon. I promise. There will be peace. You must trust. Your must go to sleep, like good children.</p>
<p>&ldquo;He tells us what we long to believe. He&rsquo;s very convincing.</p>
<p>&ldquo;I struggle against him. He&rsquo;s like an old movie star, I tell myself, with false teeth and a face job. at the same time I sway towards him, like one hypnotized. If only it were true. If only I could believe.</p>
<p>&ldquo;Now he&rsquo;s telling us that an underground espionage ring has been cracked, by a team of Eyes, working with an inside informant. The ring has been smuggling precious national resources over the border into Canada.&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 93</div></div><p>In this first paragraph, Atwood twists a common aphorism by subtly adjusting the pronouns. In the next few paragraphs, Aunt Lydia explains how she will help a whole gender forget that it ever had equal rights—and that this will somehow be better for everyone.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;Not every Commander has a Handmaid: some of their Wives have children. <em>From each,</em> says the slogan, <em>according to her ability; to each according to his needs.</em> We recited that, three times, after dessert. It was from the Bible, or so they said. St. Paul again, in Acts.</p>
<p>&ldquo;You are a transitional generation, said Aunt Lydia. It is the hardest for you. We know the sacrifices you are being expected to make. It is hard when men revile you. For the ones who come after you, it will be easier. They will accept their duties with willing hearts.</p>
<p>&ldquo;She did not say: Because they will have no memories, of any other way.</p>
<p>&ldquo;She said: Because they won&rsquo;t want things they can&rsquo;t have.&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 127</div></div><p>This next segment exhibits Atwood&rsquo;s lovely writing style, this time describing what it would be like living in such a repressive and seemingly utterly joyless society.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;The willow is in full plumage and is no help, with its insinuating whispers. <em>Rendezvous</em>, it says, <em>terraces;</em> the sibilants run up my spine, a shiver as if in fever. The summer dress rustles against the flesh of my thighs, the grass grows underfoot, at the edges of my eyes there are movements, in the branches; feathers, flittings, grace notes, tree into bird, metamorphosis run wild. Goddesses are possible now and the air suffuses with desire. Even the bricks of the house are softening, becoming tractile; if I leaned against them they&rsquo;d be warm and yielding. It&rsquo;s amazing what denial can do. Did the sight of my ankle make him lightheaded, faint, at the checkpoint yesterday, when I dropped my pass and let him pick it up for me? No handkerchief, no fan, I use what&rsquo;s handy.</p>
<p>&ldquo;Winter is not so dangerous. I need hardness, cold rigidity; <strong>not this heaviness, as if I&rsquo;m a melon on a stem, this liquid ripeness.</strong> (Emphasis added.)&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 161–162</div></div><p>And here, further on, we have Selena Joy interacting with Offred. Selena wants a child—badly. She is convinced that her Commander will not be able to impregnate Offred, so she wants her to sleep with Nick, the help. In exchange for taking this risk, she offers to get a picture of the child that was stolen from Offred when she was kidnapped into servitude. This is twisted nearly beyond comprehension: Joy is seemingly unaware of the depravity of the cruel power that she exerts over Offred—she just benefits from it as if it&rsquo;s her birthright.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>She leans forward. &ldquo;Maybe I could get something for your,&rdquo; she says. Because I have been good. &ldquo;Something you want,&rdquo; she adds, wheedling almost.</p>
<p>&ldquo;What&rsquo;s that?&rdquo; I say. I can&rsquo;t think of anything I truly want that she&rsquo;d be likely or able to give me.</p>
<p>&ldquo;A picture,&rdquo; she says, <strong>as if offering me some juvenile treat, an ice cream, a trip to the zoo.</strong> I look up at her again, puzzled.</p>
<p>&ldquo;Of her,&rdquo; she says. &ldquo;Your little girl. But only maybe.&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 216</div></div><p>And, finally, the Commander opens up to Offred, literally begging her to put a female stamp of approval on all that men have done for women, in the form of the highly patriarchal society in which the Commander has ended up basically owning Offred. Again, this is bizarre, twisted and hard to wrap your head around. He couches the societal transformation as a necessary rescue for <em>men</em>, because they were suffering so badly in the previous, slightly less-rigid patriarchy.</p>
<p>This passage—as with so many others in this book—could stand alone as a one-page short story.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;You know what [men] were complaining about the most? Inability to feel. Men were turning off on sex, even. They were turning off on marriage.</p>
<p>&ldquo;Do they feel now? I say.</p>
<p>&ldquo;Yes, he says, looking at me. They do. He stands up, comes around the desk to the chair where I&rsquo;m sitting. He puts his hands on my shoulders, from behind. I can&rsquo;t see him.</p>
<p>&ldquo;I like to know what you think, his voice says, from behind me.</p>
<p>&ldquo;I don&rsquo;t think a lot, I say lightly. What he wants is intimacy, but I can&rsquo;t give him that.</p>
<p>&ldquo;There&rsquo;s hardly any point in my thinking, is there? I say. What I think doesn&rsquo;t matter.</p>
<p>&ldquo;Which is the only reason he can tell me things.</p>
<p>&ldquo;Come now, he says, pressing a little with his hands. I&rsquo;m interested in your opinion. You&rsquo;re intelligent enough, you must have an opinion.</p>
<p>&ldquo;About what? I say.</p>
<p>&ldquo;What we&rsquo;ve done, he says. How things have worked out.</p>
<p>&ldquo;I hold myself very still. I try to empty my mind. I think about the sky, at night, when there&rsquo;s no moon. I have no opinion, I say.</p>
<p>&ldquo;He sighs, relaxes his hands, but leaves them on my shoulders. He knows what I think, all right.</p>
<p>&ldquo;You can&rsquo;t make an omelette without breaking eggs, is what he says. We thought we could do better.</p>
<p>&ldquo;Better? I say, in a small voice. How can he think this is better?</p>
<p>&ldquo;<strong>Better never means better for everyone, he says. It always means worse, for some.</strong> (Emphasis added.)&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 221–222</div></div><p>The commander continues in this vein, calling on capital-N Nature for justification for the less-fair but super-awesome society of Gilead.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>"It means you can&rsquo;t cheat Nature,&ldquo; he says. &ldquo;Nature demands variety, for men. It stands to reason, it&rsquo;s part of the procreational strategy. It&rsquo;s Nature&rsquo;s plan.&rdquo; I don&rsquo;t say anything, so he goes on. &ldquo;Women know that instinctively. Why did they buy so many different clothes, in the old days? To trick the men into thinking they were several different women. A new one each day.&rdquo;</p>
<p><strong>He say this as if he believes it, but he says many things that way. Maybe he believes it, maybe he doesn&rsquo;t, or maybe he does both at the same time. Impossible to tell what he believes.</strong></p>
<p>&ldquo;So now that we don&rsquo;t have different clothes,&rdquo; I say, &ldquo;you merely have different women.&rdquo; This is irony, but he doesn&rsquo;t acknowledge it.</p>
<p>&ldquo;It solves a lot of problems,&rdquo; he says, without a twitch. (Emphasis added.)</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 249</div></div><p>The epilogue is of a discussion in the even-further future, where society has once again regained its senses and Gilead is just a long-past and bizarre blip on the bumpy road to the here-and-now.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;We held out no hope of tracing the narrator herself directly. It was clear from internal evidence that she was among the first wave of women recruited for reproductive purposes and allotted to those who both required such services and could lay claim to them through their position in the elite. The regime created an instant pool of such women by the simple tactic of declaring all second marriages and non-marital liaisons adulterous, arresting the female partners, and, on the grounds that they were morally unfit, confiscating the children they already had, who were adopted by childless couples of the upper echelons who were eager for progeny by any means. (in the middle period, this policy was extended to cover all marriages not contracted within the state church.) Men highly placed in the regime were thus able to pick and choose among women who had demonstrated their reproductive fitness by having produced one or more healthy children, a desirable characteristic in an age of plummeting Caucasian birth rates, a phenomenon observable not only in Gilead but in most northern Caucasian societies of the time.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 316</div></div><p>This clinical summary is much more palatable than the autobiography that preceded it. It is easy to view past massive injustices in this light—Atwood juxtaposes the scientific attitude of the historians to the story that preceded it, in which the horror of having subjugated an entire gender was palpable. Without context, we easily consume stories of unspeakable atrocity in the past. Perhaps that is the only way to do so, and be able to move forward with any hope that we won&rsquo;t just repeat ourselves.</p>
<p><hr></p>
<div class="footnote-reference"><span id="footnote_DRAFTABLE_ENTRY_3134_1_body" class="footnote-number">[1]</span> While some may argue that the U.S. is hardly a religious society, that is just not true. It&rsquo;s just…well-masked…but there are rules about who is allowed to succeed and who is not. Can you imagine a Jewish or Muslim president? How about an atheist? While some of us can imagine this, there is no way that it could happen in anything approaching the near future. Religion plays a big role in women&rsquo;s lives—the &ldquo;debate&rdquo; about abortion is only a debate in the U.S. and other theocracies—or in the moral strictures about self-control and drug use or the vindictive use of jail as punishment. The list goes on and on. The U.S. is a religious society, through and through, though it masks itself with the sheen of quasi-democracy and lip service to freedom for all.</div><div class="footnote-reference"><span id="footnote_DRAFTABLE_ENTRY_3134_2_body" class="footnote-number">[2]</span> She is unnamed, except as &ldquo;Offred&rdquo;, which is the possessive &ldquo;of&rdquo; followed by the name of the Commander to which she&rsquo;s currently assigned as a broodmare</div>      </div>
      </div>
        <div class="footer">
    <div class="footer-data"><div class="footer-links"><ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/contact.php" title="">Contact</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/support.php" title="">Support</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/privacy.php" title="">Privacy</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/rights.php" title="">Rights</a></li></ul></div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="copyright">Copyright (c) 1999-2026 earthli.com. All Rights Reserved.</div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="versions">Powered by <ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore/app_news.php">earthli News 3.7</a></li><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore" title="">earthli WebCore&trade; 3.7</a></li></ul></div></div>    </div>
      </div>
  </div>  </body>
</html>
]]>
  </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
      <title type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[One Flew Over the Cuckoo's Nest by Ken Kesey (read in 2015)]]>
  </title>
    <id>https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3135</id>
    <link href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3135"/>
    <updated>2015-05-17T10:44:05+02:00</updated>
    <author>
        <name type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[Marco von Ballmoos]]>
  </name>
      <uri>https://earthli.com/users/marco</uri>
    </author>
      <summary type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<blockquote class="quote abstract "><div>Disclaimer: these are notes I took while reading this book. They include citations I found interesting or enlightening or particularly well-written. In some cases, I&rsquo;ve pointed out which of these applies to which citation; in others, I have not. Any benefit you gain from reading these notes is... [<a class="complete-text-link" href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3135">More</a>]</div></blockquote>]]>
  </summary>
      <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<html lang="en">
  <head>
    <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/themes/ice.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/fonts/raleway.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/core/medium.css">
  </head>
  <body>
<div class="style-controls">  <div class="page">
    <div class="page-body">
<div class="info-box-top">
<p>
Published by <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_user.php?name=marco" title="Marco von Ballmoos" class="visible">marco</a> on <span class="date-time">17. May 2015 10:44:05 (GMT-5)</span>
</p>
</div>
      <div class="text-flow wide">
  <blockquote class="quote abstract "><div>Disclaimer: these are notes I took while reading this book. They include citations I found interesting or enlightening or particularly well-written. In some cases, I&rsquo;ve pointed out which of these applies to which citation; in others, I have not. Any benefit you gain from reading these notes is purely incidental to the purpose they serve of reminding me what I once read. Please see Wikipedia for a summary if I&rsquo;ve failed to provide one sufficient for your purposes. If my notes serve to trigger an interest in this book, then I&rsquo;m happy for you.</div></blockquote><p>This is the story of Big Chief and McMurphy and Nurse Ratched. The Big Chief is a long-time resident of the mental institution run by Head Nurse Ratched; McMurphy arrives as a transferee from a work camp who thinks he&rsquo;s going to have an easier ride in the home. This is true, at least at first. He is a breath of fresh air for the other inmates there, a force of nature, as it were. He chafes and takes liberties and cracks wise and runs card games and generally doesn&rsquo;t follow the rules. He tries to help free the others from their artificial, psychological fetters. He takes them on a fishing trip. He sneaks ladies and booze into the building late at night. He tries to help poor Billy. Ratched thwarts him every step of the way. The Big Chief narrates, grows and learns. McMurphy sacrifices the last of what he has in a futile act of revenge, though he is aware of what is happening. The Big Chief makes an actual escape. Surprisingly well-written—I didn&rsquo;t expect such poetic prose from Kesey—and deep. Recommended.</p>
<h2>Citations</h2><p>On the subject of poetic prose, here&rsquo;s our first look at the resident intellectual, Harding.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Harding is a flat, nervous man with a face that sometimes makes you think you seen him in the movies, like it&rsquo;s a face too pretty to just be a guy on the street. He&rsquo;s got wide, thin shoulders and he curves them in around his chest when he&rsquo;s trying to hide inside himself. He&rsquo;s got hands so long and white and dainty I think they carved each other out of soap, and sometimes they get loose and glide around in front of him free as two white birds until he noticed them and traps them between his knees; it bothers him that he&rsquo;s got pretty hands.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 19</div></div><p>How do we know that Harding is an intellectual? Well, just listen to how he talks, all highfalutin&rsquo; and such. Here he laments a supposed matriarchy, which while true for him, is a fiction he is capable of maintaining only because of his own personal situation. He is oppressed by his wife, who he is too weak to look at on eye-level and, after voluntarily committing himself, finds himself subject to the rule of Nurse Ratched. This does not a matriarchy make, though. It&rsquo;s a nicely written speech, but the content is a bit amiss, whether because of Harding&rsquo;s misconceptions or the author&rsquo;s, I&rsquo;m not sure. It smacks of the terror a man has every time women start to exert just a little bit of control, that little bit not even close to commensurate with the proportion of society that they comprise.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>"Ah, I believe my friend is catching on, fellow rabbits. Tell me, Mr. McMurphy, how does one go about showing a woman who&rsquo;s boss, I mean other than laughing at her? How does he show her who&rsquo;s king of the mountain? A man like you should be able to tell us that. You don&rsquo;t slap her around, do you? No, then she calls the law. You don&rsquo;t lose your temper and shout at her; she&rsquo;ll win by a trying to placate her big ol&rsquo; angry boy: &lsquo;Is us wittle man getting <em>fussy?</em> Ahhhhh?&rsquo; Have you ever tried to keep up a noble and angry front in the face of such consolation? So you see, my friend, it is somewhat as you stated: man has but <em>one</em> truly effective weapon against the juggernaut of modern matriarchy, but it certainly is not laughter. One weapon, and with every passing year in this hip, motivationally researched society, more and more people are discovering how to render that weapon useless and conquer those who have hitherto been the conquerors—&rdquo;</p>
<p>&ldquo;Lord, Harding, but you do come on,&rdquo; McMurphy says.</p>
<p>&ldquo;—and do you think, for acclaimed pychopathic powers, that you could effectively use your weapon against our champion? Do you think you could use it against Miss Ratched, McMurphy? Ever?&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 63–64</div></div><p>The next passage is a nice reminder of what life is like for those for whom life streams along much too quickly to really and truly grasp. While we, possessed as many of us are with more-than-adequate intellect, sometimes feel overwhelmed and tired by the demands of the quotidian, how do you think it feels for poor old Pete and his friends?</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;There&rsquo;s old Pete, face like a searchlight. He&rsquo;s fifty yards off to my left, but I can see him plain as though there wasn&rsquo;t any fog at all. Or maybe he&rsquo;s up right close and real small, I can&rsquo;t be sure. He tells me once about how tired he is, and just his saying it makes me see his whole life on the railroad, see him working to figure out how to read a watch, breaking a sweat while he tries to get the right button in the right hole of his railroad overalls, doing his absolute damnedest to keep up with a job that comes so easy to the others they can sit back in a chair padded with cardboard and read mystery stories and girlie books. Not that he ever really figured to keep up—he knew from the start he couldn&rsquo;t do that—but he had to try to keep up, just to keep them in sight. So for forty years he was able to live, if not right in the world of men, at least on the edge of it.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 117–118</div></div><p>And here, Kesey writes of the revolution&rsquo;s great enemy: the enervation of constant struggle leading to apathy, to caginess, to pacing oneself. The white-hot nova of revolution realizes it&rsquo;s going to expend itself uselessly on a small corner of the beast and pulls back…back into itself, to reconsider, to bide its time, to be in it for the long haul. It&rsquo;s quite possibly the right thing to do—after all, why sacrifice the best, most experienced troops in a gesture?—but no war was ever won without sacrifice.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;But me, I <em>know</em> why. I heard him talk to the lifeguard. He&rsquo;s finally getting cagey, is all. The way Papa finally did when he came to realize that he couldn&rsquo;t beat that group from town who wanted the government to put in the dam because of the money and the work it would bring, and because it would get rid of the village: Let that tribe of fish Injuns take their sink and their two hundred thousand dollars the government is paying them and go some place else with it! Papa had done the smart thing signing the papers; there wasn&rsquo;t anything to gain by bucking it. The government would of got it anyhow, sooner or later; this way the tribe would get paid good. It was the smart thing. McMurphy was doing the smart thing. I would see that. He was giving in because it was the smartest thing to do, not because of any of these other reasons the Acutes were making up. He didn&rsquo;t say so, but I knew and I told myself it was the smart thing to do. i told myself that over and over: It&rsquo;s safe. Like hiding. it&rsquo;s the smart thing to do nobody could say and different. I know what he&rsquo;s doing.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 150</div></div><p>This is a scene from the fishing trip, a tumult of activity told in long, clause-filled sentences that quickly resolve the scene with a remarkably sharp clarity. Again, the chief examines this force of nature that names itself McMurphy, analyzes his ways of dealing with the deadly grasp that society places at their throats. He deals with it by laughing in its face, by deliberately not acknowledging its power, and to hell with the consequences, because nothing could be worse than submission to this soft, cozening domination by something lesser.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;This scramble of action holds for a space, a second there on the sea—the men yammering and struggling and cussing and trying to tend their poles while watching the girl; the bleeding, crashing battle between Scanlon and my fish at everybody&rsquo;s feet; the lines all tangled and shooting every which way with the doctor&rsquo;s glasses-on-a-string tangled and dangling from one line ten feet off the back of the boat, fish striking at the flash of the lens, and the girl cussing for all she&rsquo;s worth and looking now at her bare breasts, one white and one smarting red—and George takes his eye off where he&rsquo;s going and runs the boat into that log and kills the engine.</p>
<p>&ldquo;While McMurphy laughs. Rocking farther and farther backward against the cabin top, spreading his laugh out across the water—laughing at the girl, at the guys, at George, at me sucking my bleeding thumb, at the captain back at the pier and the bicycle rider and the service-station guys and the give thousand houses and the Big Nurse and all of it. Because he knows you have to laugh at the things that hurt you just to keep yourself in balance, just to keep the world from running you plumb crazy. He knows there&rsquo;s a painful side; he knows my thumb smarts and his girl field has a bruised breast and the doctor is losing his glasses, but he won&rsquo;t let the pain blot out the humor no more&rsquo;n he&rsquo;ll let the humor blot out the pain.&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 214</div></div><p>And, finally, McMurphy&rsquo;s nova comes at last, with his denouement serving as cradle for the Chief&rsquo;s rebirth.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;I looked at McMurphy out of the corner of my eye, trying not to be obvious about it. He was in his chair in the corner, resting a second before he came out for the next round—in a long line of next rounds. The thing he was fighting, you couldn&rsquo;t whip it for good. All you could do was keep on whipping it, till you couldn&rsquo;t come out any more and somebody else had to take your place.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 273</div></div><p>And, after Billy Bibbitt was discovered in the doctor&rsquo;s office with his throat cut by his own hand, not because of what McMurphy had helped him do—eat, drink, lay with a whore, be merry—but because of the guilt that Ratched had instantly instilled upon him for having partaken.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;She walked straight to McMurphy.</p>
<p>&ldquo;“He cut his throat,” she said. She waited, hoping he would say something. He wouldn’t look up. “He opened the doctor’s desk and found some instruments and cut his throat. The poor miserable, misunderstood boy killed himself. He’s there now, in the doctor’s chair, with his throat cut.”</p>
<p>&ldquo;She waited again. But he still wouldn’t look up.</p>
<p>&ldquo;“First Charles Cheswick and now William Bibbit! I hope you’re finally satisfied. Playing with human lives—gambling with human lives—as if you thought yourself to be a God!”</p>
<p>&ldquo;She turned and walked into the Nurses’ Station and closed the door behind her, leaving a shrill, killing-cold sound ringing in the tubes of light over our heads.</p>
<p>&ldquo;First I had a quick thought to try to stop him, talk him into taking what he’d already won and let her have the last round, but another, bigger thought wiped the first thought away completely. I suddenly realized with a crystal certainty that neither I nor any of the half-score of us could stop him. […]</p>
<p>&ldquo;We couldn’t stop him because we were the ones making him do it. It wasn’t the nurse that was forcing him, it was our need that was making him push himself slowly up from sitting, his big hands driving down on the leather chair arms, pushing him up, rising and standing like one of those moving-picture zombies, obeying orders beamed at him from forty masters. <strong>It was us that had been making him go on for weeks, keeping him standing long after his feet and legs had given out, weeks of making him wink and grin and laugh and go on with his act long after his humor had been parched dry between two electrodes.</strong></p>
<p>&ldquo;We made him stand and hitch up his black shorts like they were horsehide chaps, and push back his cap with one finger like it was a ten-gallon Stetson, slow, mechanical gestures—and when he walked across the floor you could hear the iron in his bare heels ring sparks out of the tile.</p>
<p>&ldquo;Only at the last—after he’d smashed through that glass door, her face swinging around, with terror forever ruining any other look she might ever try to use again, screaming when he grabbed for her and ripped her uniform all the way down the front, screaming again when the two nippled circles started from her chest and swelled out and out, bigger than anybody had ever even imagined, warm and pink in the light—only at the last, after the officials realized that the three black boys weren’t going to do anything but stand and watch and they would have to beat him off without their help, doctors and supervisors and nurses prying those heavy red fingers out of the white flesh of her throat as if they were her neck bones, jerking him backward off of her with a loud heave of breath, <strong>only then did he show any sign that he might be anything other than a sane, willful, dogged man performing a hard duty that finally just had to be done, like it or not.</strong></p>
<p>&ldquo;He gave a cry. At the last, falling backward, his face appearing to us for a second upside down before he was smothered on the floor by a pile of white uniforms, he let himself cry out:</p>
<p>&ldquo;A sound of cornered-animal fear and hate and surrender and defiance, that if you ever trailed coon or cougar or lynx is like the last sound the treed and shot and falling animal makes as the dogs get him, when he finally doesn’t care any more about anything but himself and his dying. (Emphasis added.)&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">274</div></div><p>The Big Chief realizes that McMurphy wasn&rsquo;t a nova of his own at all, but rather a vessel, a lens, through which the remaining power of the other inmates was focused. He knew what he was there for, he regretted the lost years of a possible future that would never come, but knew that he&rsquo;d had more life than all of the others put together and was willing to sacrifice himself if only they would just. Wake. Up.</p>
      </div>
      </div>
        <div class="footer">
    <div class="footer-data"><div class="footer-links"><ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/contact.php" title="">Contact</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/support.php" title="">Support</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/privacy.php" title="">Privacy</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/rights.php" title="">Rights</a></li></ul></div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="copyright">Copyright (c) 1999-2026 earthli.com. All Rights Reserved.</div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="versions">Powered by <ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore/app_news.php">earthli News 3.7</a></li><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore" title="">earthli WebCore&trade; 3.7</a></li></ul></div></div>    </div>
      </div>
  </div>  </body>
</html>
]]>
  </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
      <title type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[A Dance with Dragons by George R.R. Martin (Read in 2015)]]>
  </title>
    <id>https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3115</id>
    <link href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3115"/>
    <updated>2015-03-29T20:22:21+02:00</updated>
    <author>
        <name type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[Marco von Ballmoos]]>
  </name>
      <uri>https://earthli.com/users/marco</uri>
    </author>
      <summary type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<blockquote class="quote abstract "><div>Disclaimer: these are notes I took while reading this book. They include citations I found interesting or enlightening or particularly well-written. In some cases, I&rsquo;ve pointed out which of these applies to which citation; in others, I have not. Any benefit you gain from reading these notes is... [<a class="complete-text-link" href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3115">More</a>]</div></blockquote>]]>
  </summary>
      <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<html lang="en">
  <head>
    <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/themes/ice.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/fonts/raleway.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/core/medium.css">
  </head>
  <body>
<div class="style-controls">  <div class="page">
    <div class="page-body">
<div class="info-box-top">
<p>
Published by <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_user.php?name=marco" title="Marco von Ballmoos" class="visible">marco</a> on <span class="date-time">29. Mar 2015 20:22:21 (GMT-5)</span>
</p>
<p>
Updated by <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_user.php?name=marco" title="Marco von Ballmoos" class="visible">marco</a> on <span class="date-time">17. May 2015 00:30:20 (GMT-5)</span>
</p>
</div>
      <div class="text-flow wide">
  <blockquote class="quote abstract "><div>Disclaimer: these are notes I took while reading this book. They include citations I found interesting or enlightening or particularly well-written. In some cases, I&rsquo;ve pointed out which of these applies to which citation; in others, I have not. Any benefit you gain from reading these notes is purely incidental to the purpose they serve of reminding me what I once read. Please see Wikipedia for a summary if I&rsquo;ve failed to provide one sufficient for your purposes. If my notes serve to trigger an interest in this book, then I&rsquo;m happy for you.</div></blockquote><p>This is book five of the <em>Song of Ice and Fire</em>. Bran ends up in the lair of the Children of the Forest, far North of the Wall, with the three-eyed raven. Jon&rsquo;s fate is unknown, but things don&rsquo;t look too good. Arya&rsquo;s training continues. Tyrion is captured by Mormont and both of them near Meerreen. Quentyn&rsquo;s mission fails horribly, Victarion approaches Meereen, possessed of powers. Daenerys accepts her destiny and mounts Drogon. Stannis marches on the marshes first, rousts the Ironborn, captures Asha and then sinks into the snows before he can arrive at Winterfell, where he wants to roust the Boltons. Young Aegon Targaryen and John Connington land in Dorne and make their way north to attempt recapture of the Iron Throne. Cersei takes the walk of shame.</p>
<h2>Citations</h2><p>Some of the characters are almost shockingly small-minded. Daenarys bears unhealable grudges against traitors who betrayed her family decades or even centuries ago. And in the next passage, Davos&rsquo;s fealty to Stannis is so strong that he thinks the following of his old friend Salladhor Saan,</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;I knew the day would come, Davos told himself. I was fond of the old rogue, but never so great a fool as to trust him.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 138</div></div><p>He should just as well think this of Stannis, who is at least as deluded, terrifying and cruel as anyone else in the book. He does nothing for himself, but for what he calls justice.</p>
<p>This next passage serves to illustrate just how good a writer Martin is, how deliciously he brings you into the moment. Here we see Reek in his dark cell, snacking at long last.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;The rat squealed as he bit into it, squirming wildly in his hands, frantic to escape. The belly was the softest part. He tore at the sweet meat, the warm blood running over his lips. It was so good that it brought tears to his eyes. His belly rumbled and he swallowed. By the third bite the rat had ceased to struggle, and he was feeling almost content.</p>
<p>&ldquo;[…]</p>
<p>&ldquo;He crouched down in a corner of his cell, clutching his prize under his chin. Blood ran from the corners of his mouth as he nibbled at the rat with what remained of his teeth, trying to bolt down as much of the warm flesh as he could before the cell was opened. The meat was stringy, but so rich he thought he might be sick. He chewed and swallowed, picking small bones from the holes in his gums where teeth had been yanked out. It hurt to chew, but he was so hungry he could not stop.&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 176</div></div><p>As good as some of the descriptions are, he is equally adept at dialogue. Here he mixes thoughts (in italics) with spoken words to create a full picture of the conversation from the point of view of Daenerys.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>She was no stranger to the overblown courtesies of Qarth. “If you are drunk, blame the wine.”</p>
<p>“No wine is half so intoxicating as your beauty. My manse has seemed as empty as a tomb since Daenerys departed, and all the pleasures of the Queen of Cities have been as ashes in my mouth. Why did you abandon me?” </p>
<p><em>I was hounded from your city in fear for my life.</em> “It was time. Qarth wished me gone.” </p>
<p>“Who? The Pureborn? They have water in their veins. The Spicers? There are curds between their ears. And the Undying are all dead. You should have taken me to husband. I am almost certain that I asked you for your hand. Begged you, even.”</p>
<p>“Only half a hundred times,” Dany teased. “You gave up too easily, my lord. For I must marry, all agree.”</p>
<p>“A <em>khaleesi</em> must have a khal,” said Irri, as she filled the queen’s cup once again. “This is known.”</p>
<p>“Shall I ask again?” wondered Xaro. “No, I know that smile. It is a cruel queen who dices with men’s hearts. Humble merchants like myself are no more than stones beneath your jeweled sandals.” A single tear ran slowly down his pale white cheek.</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 225</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>"[…]Do you know how Unsullied are made and trained?”</p>
<p>“Cruelly, I have no doubt. When a smith makes a sword, he thrusts the blade into the fire, beats on it with a hammer, then plunges it into iced water to temper the steel. If you would savor the sweet taste of the fruit, you must water the tree.”</p>
<p>“This tree has been watered with blood.”</p>
<p>“How else, to grow a soldier? Your Radiance enjoyed my dancers. Would it surprise you to know that they are slaves, bred and trained in Yunkai? They have been dancing since they were old enough to walk. How else to achieve such perfection?” He took a swallow of his wine. “They are expert in all the erotic arts as well. I had thought to make Your Grace a gift of them.”</p>
<p>“By all means.” Dany was unsurprised. “I shall free them.”</p>
<p>That made him wince. “And what would they do with freedom? As well give a fish a suit of mail. They were made to dance.”</p>
<p>“Made by who? Their masters? Perhaps your dancers would sooner build or bake or farm. Have you asked them?”</p>
<p>“Perhaps your elephants would sooner be nightingales. Instead of sweet song, Meereen’s nights would be filled with thunderous trumpetings, and your trees would shatter beneath the weight of great grey birds.” Xaro sighed. “Daenerys, my delight, beneath that sweet young breast beats a tender heart … but take counsel from an older, wiser head. Things are not always as they seem. Much that may seem evil can be good. […]”</p>
<p>[…] the Queen of Cities rests upon the backs of slaves. Ask yourself, if all men must grub in the dirt for food, how shall any man lift his eyes to contemplate the stars? If each of us must break his back to build a hovel, who shall raise the temples to glorify the gods? For some men to be great, others must be enslaved.”</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 226–227</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;A wooden keep could be seen beside the water, rotted and overgrown. Slender spires took form above it, some of them snapped off like broken spears. Roofless towers appeared and disappeared, thrusting blindly upward. Halls and galleries drifted past: graceful buttresses, delicate arches, fluted columns, terraces and bowers. All ruined, all desolate, all fallen. The grey moss grew thickly here, covering the fallen stones in great mounds and bearding all the towers. Black vines crept in and out of windows, through doors and over archways, up the sides of high stone walls.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 258</div></div><p>Brutal:</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;From time to time some wench escapes and lives to tell the tale. Most are less fortunate. When Ramsay catches them he rapes them, flays them, feeds their corpses to his dogs, and brings their skins back to the Dreadfort as trophies. If they have given him good sport, he slits their throats before he skins them. Elsewise, t’other way around.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 430</div></div><p>Is this a deliberate pun?</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Brown Ben Plumm was puzzled. “Who is Eroeh?” “A girl I thought I’d saved from rape and torment. All I did was make it worse for her in the end. And all I did in Astapor was make ten thousand Eroehs.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 442</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Tyrion had never seen a bigger moon. Monstrous, swollen, it looked as if it had swallowed the sun and woken with a fever. Its twin, floating on the sea beyond the ship, shimmered red with every wave.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 489</div></div><p>This is exactly how people accustomed to snow talk to those unaccustomed. The following was uttered after it had only been snowing for a week and a half straight and a mere six or seven feet of snow lay on the ground.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Ned’s girl,” echoed Big Bucket Wull. “And we should have had her and the castle both if you prancing southron jackanapes didn’t piss your satin breeches at a little snow.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 615</div></div><p>More northern bravado:</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;That seemed to amuse the northman. “I want to live forever in a land where summer lasts a thousand years. I want a castle in the clouds where I can look down over the world. I want to be six-and-twenty again. When I was six-and-twenty I could fight all day and fuck all night. What men want does not matter. “Winter is almost upon us, boy. And winter is death. I would sooner my men die fighting for the Ned’s little girl than alone and hungry in the snow, weeping tears that freeze upon their cheeks. No one sings songs of men who die like that. As for me, I am old. This will be my last winter. Let me bathe in Bolton blood before I die. I want to feel it spatter across my face when my axe bites deep into a Bolton skull. I want to lick it off my lips and die with the taste of it on my tongue.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>And, then, from even farther north, is Tormund Giantsbane, another wonderful talker.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Half-brothers, born o’ different mothers. Alfyn’s member was a wee thing, <strong>even smaller than yours</strong>, but he was never shy with where he stuck it. Had a son in every village, that one. (Emphasis added.)&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 847</div></div><p>And then,</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The wildling gave him a shrewd look. “Aye, I might have. And you crows might decide to close that gate. A few fighters on t’other side, well, that way the gate stays open, don’t it?” He grinned. <strong>“I bought your bloody horse, Jon Snow. Don’t mean that we can’t count his teeth.</strong> Now don’t you go thinking me and mine don’t trust you. We trust you just as much as you trust us.” He snorted. (Emphasis added.)&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 849</div></div><p>And finally,</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;I know,” said Jon Snow. Tormund turned back. “You know nothing. You killed a dead man, aye, I heard. Mance killed a hundred. A man can fight the dead, but when their masters come, when the white mists rise up … how do you fight a mist, crow? Shadows with teeth … air so cold it hurts to breathe, like a knife inside your chest … you do not know, you cannot know … can your sword cut cold?&rdquo;</div></blockquote>      </div>
      </div>
        <div class="footer">
    <div class="footer-data"><div class="footer-links"><ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/contact.php" title="">Contact</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/support.php" title="">Support</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/privacy.php" title="">Privacy</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/rights.php" title="">Rights</a></li></ul></div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="copyright">Copyright (c) 1999-2026 earthli.com. All Rights Reserved.</div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="versions">Powered by <ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore/app_news.php">earthli News 3.7</a></li><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore" title="">earthli WebCore&trade; 3.7</a></li></ul></div></div>    </div>
      </div>
  </div>  </body>
</html>
]]>
  </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
      <title type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[A Feast for Crows by George R.R. Martin (Read in 2015)]]>
  </title>
    <id>https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3116</id>
    <link href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3116"/>
    <updated>2015-03-29T20:22:00+02:00</updated>
    <author>
        <name type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[Marco von Ballmoos]]>
  </name>
      <uri>https://earthli.com/users/marco</uri>
    </author>
      <summary type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<blockquote class="quote abstract "><div>Disclaimer: these are notes I took while reading this book. They include citations I found interesting or enlightening or particularly well-written. In some cases, I&rsquo;ve pointed out which of these applies to which citation; in others, I have not. Any benefit you gain from reading these notes is... [<a class="complete-text-link" href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3116">More</a>]</div></blockquote>]]>
  </summary>
      <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<html lang="en">
  <head>
    <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/themes/ice.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/fonts/raleway.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/core/medium.css">
  </head>
  <body>
<div class="style-controls">  <div class="page">
    <div class="page-body">
<div class="info-box-top">
<p>
Published by <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_user.php?name=marco" title="Marco von Ballmoos" class="visible">marco</a> on <span class="date-time">29. Mar 2015 20:22:00 (GMT-5)</span>
</p>
<p>
Updated by <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_user.php?name=marco" title="Marco von Ballmoos" class="visible">marco</a> on <span class="date-time">17. May 2015 10:17:53 (GMT-5)</span>
</p>
</div>
      <div class="text-flow wide">
  <blockquote class="quote abstract "><div>Disclaimer: these are notes I took while reading this book. They include citations I found interesting or enlightening or particularly well-written. In some cases, I&rsquo;ve pointed out which of these applies to which citation; in others, I have not. Any benefit you gain from reading these notes is purely incidental to the purpose they serve of reminding me what I once read. Please see Wikipedia for a summary if I&rsquo;ve failed to provide one sufficient for your purposes. If my notes serve to trigger an interest in this book, then I&rsquo;m happy for you.</div></blockquote><p>This is book four of the <em>Song of Ice and Fire</em>. Cersei descends into paranoid madness, reinstating a religious army, an act she would come to rue as it backfires spectacularly. Jaime and Brienne meet up again in the Riverlands, after Jaime had solved a few issues there. The Iron Islands feature much more prominently, with all of the Greyjoys—Euron, Victarion, Aeron and Asha—getting in on the action. In Dorne, intrigue abounds, with plot built on plot and the Red Viper&rsquo;s brother machinating to maintain the power balance with King&rsquo;s Landing and the upper South. Quentyn Martell has traveled East with his friends to try to join Dorne to the Targaryens through Daenerys. Arya arrives in Braavos and apprentices at the House of Black and White. Jon maintains a balance between Stannis&rsquo;s demands—and those of Melisandre—as well as arming to fight the Others from the North. Samwell travels with Gilly and Aemon around the periphery of the Seven Kingdoms by boat, to get to Old Town and train at the Citadel.</p>
<h2>Citations</h2><p>Cersei descends into paranoid madness. Here she encounters the new High Septon.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Lord Tywin had given him that crown to replace the one that was lost when the mob killed the previous High Septon. They had pulled the fat fool from his litter and torn him apart, the day Myrcella sailed for Dorne. That one was a great glutton, and biddable. This one … This High Septon was of Tyrion’s making, Cersei recalled suddenly. It was a disquieting thought. The old man’s spotted hand looked like a chicken claw as it poked from a sleeve encrusted with golden scrollwork and small crystals. Cersei knelt on the wet marble and kissed his fingers, and bid Tommen to do the same. What does he know of me? How much did the dwarf tell him? The High Septon smiled as he escorted her into the sept. But was it a threatening smile full of unspoken knowledge, or just some vacuous twitch of an old man’s […]&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 113</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;To both our queens!&rdquo; he chirruped. “To the young queen and the old!”&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 201</div></div><p>That&rsquo;s lovely: he doesn&rsquo;t refer to the <em>new</em> queen and the old, so the intended mean is to call Cersei <em>old</em> rather than <em>former</em>.</p>
<p>More evocative writing on Martin&rsquo;s part, an excellent use of metaphor:</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;His desire was as deep and boundless as the sea, but when the tide receded, the rocks of shame and guilt thrust up as sharp as ever. Sometimes the waves would cover them, but they remained beneath the waters, hard and black and slimy.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 213</div></div><p>Or here, where the master of the multi-faced God in Braavos tells Arya of the history of his temple:</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The tale of our beginnings. If you would be one of us, you had best know who we are and how we came to be. Men may whisper of the Faceless Men of Braavos, but we are older than the Secret City. Before the Titan rose, before the Unmasking of Uthero, before the Founding, we were. We have flowered in Braavos amongst these northern fogs, but we first took root in Valyria, amongst the wretched slaves who toiled in the deep mines beneath the Fourteen Flames that lit the Freehold’s nights of old.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 360</div></div><p>Or this lovely passage on the futility of war and causes and justice from the view of a simple soldier. This was presented as an explanation for how formerly honorable soldiers and men could sink to such depths.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;They see the lord who led them there cut down, and some other lord shouts that they are his now. They take a wound, and when that’s still half-healed they take another. There is never enough to eat, their shoes fall to pieces from the marching, their clothes are torn and rotting, and half of them are shitting in their breeches from drinking bad water. “If they want new boots or a warmer cloak or maybe a rusted iron halfhelm, they need to take them from a corpse, and before long they are stealing from the living too, from the smallfolk whose lands they’re fighting in, men very like the men they used to be. They slaughter their sheep and steal their chickens, and from there it’s just a short step to carrying off their daughters too. And one day they look around and realize all their friends and kin are gone, that they are fighting beside strangers beneath a banner that they hardly recognize. They don’t know where they are or how to get back home and the lord they’re fighting for does not know their names, yet here he comes, shouting for them to form up, to make a line with their spears and scythes and sharpened hoes, to stand their ground. And the knights come down on them, faceless men clad all in steel, and the iron thunder of their charge seems to fill the world … “And the man breaks.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 421</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The lady of the castle was a Lannister by marriage, a plump toddler who had been wed to his cousin Tyrek before she was a year old.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 446</div></div><p>We recoil from this notion on instinct, calling arranged marriages barbaric. But are they really worse than the modern singles scene? It&rsquo;s as if we seize on this issue because it offends our sense of direct freedom but sit back satisfied that we&rsquo;ve thrown everyone together into a system that is quite probably equally barbaric, but whose barbarity is hidden behind complexity and randomness, and therefore somehow better.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;“Plant,” said Jaime, “and pray for one last harvest.” It was not a hopeful answer, but it was the only one he had.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 450</div></div><p>The man who&rsquo;d asked had been hoping for a better answer than that. It&rsquo;s  not that he&rsquo;s grasping for handouts from his betters, but that he has invested in their society, accepted his station below them and expected something back. When this arrangement tells him to fuck off, it loses him forever. If society—e.g. the lions of Lannister—cannot protect him from the wolves (in a metaphor, perhaps banks and insurance companies), then what good is it? The citizen is not lazy or ungrateful for turning his back. This part resonated in particular because I was watching <em>Treme</em> at the same time and noticed parallels between how the high and might lords of Westeros treated their smallfolk and how the government of New Orleans treated (treats?) its citizens. They all act as if the hierarchy is God-given and cannot be changed by anything. Those on top are just as fooled as those below, failing to note the precarity of the situation. </p>
      </div>
      </div>
        <div class="footer">
    <div class="footer-data"><div class="footer-links"><ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/contact.php" title="">Contact</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/support.php" title="">Support</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/privacy.php" title="">Privacy</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/rights.php" title="">Rights</a></li></ul></div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="copyright">Copyright (c) 1999-2026 earthli.com. All Rights Reserved.</div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="versions">Powered by <ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore/app_news.php">earthli News 3.7</a></li><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore" title="">earthli WebCore&trade; 3.7</a></li></ul></div></div>    </div>
      </div>
  </div>  </body>
</html>
]]>
  </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
      <title type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[Watchmen by Alan Moore (1986--1987) (Read in 2014)]]>
  </title>
    <id>https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3082</id>
    <link href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3082"/>
    <updated>2015-03-29T20:01:56+02:00</updated>
    <author>
        <name type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[Marco von Ballmoos]]>
  </name>
      <uri>https://earthli.com/users/marco</uri>
    </author>
      <summary type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<blockquote class="quote abstract "><div>Disclaimer: these are notes I took while reading this book. They include citations I found interesting or enlightening or particularly well-written. In some cases, I&rsquo;ve pointed out which of these applies to which citation; in others, I have not. Any benefit you gain from reading these notes is... [<a class="complete-text-link" href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3082">More</a>]</div></blockquote>]]>
  </summary>
      <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<html lang="en">
  <head>
    <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/themes/ice.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/fonts/raleway.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/core/medium.css">
  </head>
  <body>
<div class="style-controls">  <div class="page">
    <div class="page-body">
<div class="info-box-top">
<p>
Published by <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_user.php?name=marco" title="Marco von Ballmoos" class="visible">marco</a> on <span class="date-time">29. Mar 2015 20:01:56 (GMT-5)</span>
</p>
</div>
      <div class="text-flow wide">
  <blockquote class="quote abstract "><div>Disclaimer: these are notes I took while reading this book. They include citations I found interesting or enlightening or particularly well-written. In some cases, I&rsquo;ve pointed out which of these applies to which citation; in others, I have not. Any benefit you gain from reading these notes is purely incidental to the purpose they serve of reminding me what I once read. Please see Wikipedia for a summary if I&rsquo;ve failed to provide one sufficient for your purposes. If my notes serve to trigger an interest in this book, then I&rsquo;m happy for you.</div></blockquote><h2>Citations</h2><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Other bury their heads between the swollen teats of indulgence and gratification, piglets squirming beneath a sow for shelter … but there is no shelter…and the future is bearing down like an express train.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">&mdash;<cite>Rorschach</cite></div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;Heard joke once: </p>
<p>&ldquo;Man goes to doctor. Says he&rsquo;s depressed. Says life seems harsh and cruel. Says he feels all alone in a threatening world. Where what lies ahead is vague and uncertain.</p>
<p>&ldquo;Doctor says &ldquo;Treatment is simple. Great clown Pagliacci is in town tonight. Go and see him. That should pick you up.&rdquo;</p>
<p>&ldquo;Man bursts into tears. Says, &ldquo;but, doctor…I am Pagliacci.&rdquo;&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">&mdash;<cite>Rorschach</cite></div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;For those of us who delight in such things, the twentieth century has, in it&rsquo;s unfolding, presented mankind with an array of behavioural paradoxes and moral conundrums hitherto unimagined and perhaps unimaginable. Science, traditional enemy of mysticism and religion, has taken on a growing understanding that the model of the universe suggested by quantum physics differs very little from the universe that Taoists and other mystics have existed in for centuries. Large numbers of young people, raised in rigidly structured and industrially oriented cultures, violently reject industrialism and seek instead some modified version of the agricultural lifestyle that their forebears debatedly enjoyed… Children starve while boots costing many thousand dollars leave their mark upon the surface of the moon. We have labored long to build a heaven, only to find it populated with horrors. </p>
<p>&ldquo;It is the oldest ironies that are still the most satisfying: man, when preparing for bloody war, will orate loudly and most eloquently in the name of peace. This dichotomy is not an invention of the twentieth century, yet it is this century that the most striking examples of the phenomena have appeared. Never before has man pursued global harmony more vocally while amassing stockpiles of weapons so devastating in their effect. The second world war − we were told − was The War To End Wars. The development of the atomic bomb is the Weapon to End Wars.</p>
<p>&ldquo;And yet the wars continue. Currently, no nation on this planet is not involved in some form of warmed struggle, if not against its neighbors then against internal forces. Furthermore, as ever-escalating amounts of money are poured into the pursuit of the specific weapon or conflict that will bring lasting peace, the drain on our economies creates a run-down urban landscape where crime flourishes and people are concerned less with national securitz than with the simple personal security needed to stop at the store late at night for a quart of milk without getting mugged. The places we struggled so viciously to keep safe are becoming increasingly dangerous.&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">&mdash;<cite>Dr. Manhattan</cite></div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;[…] God was not there. The cold, suffocating dark goes on forever, and we are alone. Live our lives, lacking anything better to do. Devise reason later. Born from oblivion; bear children, hell-bound as ourselves; go into oblvion. Existence is random. No pattern save what we imagine after staring at it for too long. No meaning save what we choose to impose.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">&mdash;<cite>Rorschach</cite></div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Why do we argue? Life&rsquo;s fragile, a successful virus clinging to a speck of mud, suspended in endless nothing.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">&mdash;<cite>Dr. Malcolm Long</cite></div></div>      </div>
      </div>
        <div class="footer">
    <div class="footer-data"><div class="footer-links"><ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/contact.php" title="">Contact</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/support.php" title="">Support</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/privacy.php" title="">Privacy</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/rights.php" title="">Rights</a></li></ul></div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="copyright">Copyright (c) 1999-2026 earthli.com. All Rights Reserved.</div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="versions">Powered by <ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore/app_news.php">earthli News 3.7</a></li><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore" title="">earthli WebCore&trade; 3.7</a></li></ul></div></div>    </div>
      </div>
  </div>  </body>
</html>
]]>
  </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
      <title type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[A Storm of Swords by George R.R. Martin (Read in 2014)]]>
  </title>
    <id>https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3084</id>
    <link href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3084"/>
    <updated>2015-03-29T19:38:51+02:00</updated>
    <author>
        <name type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[Marco von Ballmoos]]>
  </name>
      <uri>https://earthli.com/users/marco</uri>
    </author>
      <summary type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<blockquote class="quote abstract "><div>Disclaimer: these are notes I took while reading this book. They include citations I found interesting or enlightening or particularly well-written. In some cases, I&rsquo;ve pointed out which of these applies to which citation; in others, I have not. Any benefit you gain from reading these notes is... [<a class="complete-text-link" href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3084">More</a>]</div></blockquote>]]>
  </summary>
      <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<html lang="en">
  <head>
    <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/themes/ice.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/fonts/raleway.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/core/medium.css">
  </head>
  <body>
<div class="style-controls">  <div class="page">
    <div class="page-body">
<div class="info-box-top">
<p>
Published by <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_user.php?name=marco" title="Marco von Ballmoos" class="visible">marco</a> on <span class="date-time">29. Mar 2015 19:38:51 (GMT-5)</span>
</p>
</div>
      <div class="text-flow wide">
  <blockquote class="quote abstract "><div>Disclaimer: these are notes I took while reading this book. They include citations I found interesting or enlightening or particularly well-written. In some cases, I&rsquo;ve pointed out which of these applies to which citation; in others, I have not. Any benefit you gain from reading these notes is purely incidental to the purpose they serve of reminding me what I once read. Please see Wikipedia for a summary if I&rsquo;ve failed to provide one sufficient for your purposes. If my notes serve to trigger an interest in this book, then I&rsquo;m happy for you.</div></blockquote><h2>Citations</h2><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>"There was no higher honor than to receive your knighthood from the Prince of Dragonstone.&ldquo;</p>
<p>&ldquo;Tell me, then—when he touched a man on the shoulder with his sword, what did he say? &lsquo;Go forth and kill the weak&rsquo;? Or &lsquo;Go forth and defend them&rsquo;? At the Trident, those brave men Viserys spoke of died beneath dragon banners—did they give their lives because they <em>believed</em> in Rhaegar&rsquo;s cause, or because they had been bought and paid for?&rdquo; Dany turned to Mormont, crossed her arms, and waited for an answer.</p>
<p>&ldquo;My queen,&rdquo; the big man said slowly, &ldquo;all you say is true. But Rhaegar lost on the Trident. He lost the battle, he lost the war, he lost the kingdom, and he lost his life. His blood swirled downriver with the rubies from his breastplate, and Robert the Usurper rode over his corpse to steal the Iron Throne. Rhaegar fought valiantly, Rhaegar fought nobly, Rhaegar fought honorably. And Rhaegar <em>died</em>.&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption"><cite>Page 314</cite></div></div><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The Nightfort had figured in some of Old Nan’s scariest stories. It was here that Night’s King had reigned, before his name was wiped from the memory of man. This was where the Rat Cook had served the Andal king his prince-and-bacon pie, where the seventy-nine sentinels stood their watch, where brave young Danny Flint had been raped and murdered. This was the castle where King Sherrit had called down his curse on the Andals of old, where the ’prentice boys had faced the thing that came in the night, where blind Symeon Star-Eyes had seen the hellhounds fighting. Mad Axe had once walked these yards and climbed these towers, butchering his brothers in the dark.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Joffrey brought Widow’s Wail down in a savage two-handed slice, onto the book that Tyrion had given him. The heavy leather cover parted at a stroke. “Sharp! I told you, I am no stranger to Valyrian steel.” It took him half a dozen further cuts to hack the thick tome apart, and the boy was breathless by the time he was done. Sansa could feel her husband struggling with his fury as Ser Osmund Kettleblack shouted, “I pray you never turn that wicked edge on me, sire.” “See that you never give me cause, ser.” Joffrey flicked a chunk of Lives of Four Kings off the table at swordpoint, then slid Widow’s Wail back into its scabbard. “Your Grace,” Ser Garlan Tyrell said. “Perhaps you did not know. In all of Westeros there were but four copies of that book illuminated in Kaeth’s own hand.” “Now there are three.” Joffrey undid his old swordbelt to don his new one. “You and Lady Sansa owe me a better present, Uncle Imp. This one is all chopped to pieces.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Maester Aemon his blindness. Noye and his men had been waiting within, behind a gate of heavy iron bars like the two Pyp had just unlocked. The two crossbows had gotten off a dozen quarrels as the giant struggled toward them. Then the spearmen must have come to the fore, stabbing through the bars. Still the giant found the strength to reach through, twist the head off Spotted Pate, seize the iron gate, and wrench the bars apart. Links of broken chain lay strewn across the floor. One giant. All this was the work of one giant. “Are they all dead?” Maester Aemon asked softly. “Yes. Donal was the last.” Noye’s sword was sunk deep in the giant’s throat, halfway to the hilt. The armorer had always seemed such a big man to Jon, but locked in the giant’s massive arms he looked almost like a child. “The giant crushed his spine. I don’t know who died first.” He took the lantern and moved forward for a better look. “Mag.” I am the last of the giants. He could feel the sadness there, but he had no time for sadness. “It was Mag the Mighty. The king of the giants.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;“I am no lord, sire. You came because we sent for you, I hope. Though I could not say why you took so long about it.” Surprisingly, Stannis smiled at that. “You’re bold enough to be a Stark. Yes, I should have come sooner. If not for my Hand, I might not have come at all. Lord Seaworth is a man of humble birth, but he reminded me of my duty, when all I could think of was my rights. I had the cart before the horse, Davos said. I was trying to win the throne to save the kingdom, when I should have been trying to save the kingdom to win the throne.” Stannis pointed north. “There is where I’ll find the foe that I was born to fight.” “His name may not be spoken,” Melisandre added softly. “He is the God of Night and Terror, Jon Snow, and these shapes in the snow are his creatures.”&rdquo;</div></blockquote>      </div>
      </div>
        <div class="footer">
    <div class="footer-data"><div class="footer-links"><ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/contact.php" title="">Contact</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/support.php" title="">Support</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/privacy.php" title="">Privacy</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/rights.php" title="">Rights</a></li></ul></div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="copyright">Copyright (c) 1999-2026 earthli.com. All Rights Reserved.</div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="versions">Powered by <ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore/app_news.php">earthli News 3.7</a></li><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore" title="">earthli WebCore&trade; 3.7</a></li></ul></div></div>    </div>
      </div>
  </div>  </body>
</html>
]]>
  </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
      <title type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[A Game of Thrones by George R.R. Martin (Read in 2014)]]>
  </title>
    <id>https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3036</id>
    <link href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3036"/>
    <updated>2015-03-29T19:36:08+02:00</updated>
    <author>
        <name type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[Marco von Ballmoos]]>
  </name>
      <uri>https://earthli.com/users/marco</uri>
    </author>
      <summary type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<blockquote class="quote abstract "><div>Disclaimer: these are notes I took while reading this book. They include citations I found interesting or enlightening or particularly well-written. In some cases, I&rsquo;ve pointed out which of these applies to which citation; in others, I have not. Any benefit you gain from reading these notes is... [<a class="complete-text-link" href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3036">More</a>]</div></blockquote>]]>
  </summary>
      <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<html lang="en">
  <head>
    <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/themes/ice.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/fonts/raleway.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/core/medium.css">
  </head>
  <body>
<div class="style-controls">  <div class="page">
    <div class="page-body">
<div class="info-box-top">
<p>
Published by <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_user.php?name=marco" title="Marco von Ballmoos" class="visible">marco</a> on <span class="date-time">29. Mar 2015 19:36:08 (GMT-5)</span>
</p>
<p>
Updated by <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_user.php?name=marco" title="Marco von Ballmoos" class="visible">marco</a> on <span class="date-time">29. Mar 2015 19:39:37 (GMT-5)</span>
</p>
</div>
      <div class="text-flow wide">
  <blockquote class="quote abstract "><div>Disclaimer: these are notes I took while reading this book. They include citations I found interesting or enlightening or particularly well-written. In some cases, I&rsquo;ve pointed out which of these applies to which citation; in others, I have not. Any benefit you gain from reading these notes is purely incidental to the purpose they serve of reminding me what I once read. Please see Wikipedia for a summary if I&rsquo;ve failed to provide one sufficient for your purposes. If my notes serve to trigger an interest in this book, then I&rsquo;m happy for you.</div></blockquote><h2>Citations</h2><p><small class="notes">Apologies if there are transcription errors. I had to type it out all citations longhand. [1]</small></p>
<p>This is the first in the epic <em>A Song of Ice and Fire</em>. It spans hundreds of characters and dozens of tribes and lands and civilizations. The span and breadth of it are breathtaking as is the execution. Martin&rsquo;s writing style is perfectly suited to this genre. Though I&rsquo;d heard that some of his prose was a bit long-winded, focused too much on loving and languorous descriptions of food, I found it to be quite tightly written and easy reading. In fairness, I read this book after having read a lot of nineteenth-century literature, so perhaps I was better prepared than most.</p>
<p>Choice passages:</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;'Oh, my sweet summer child,&lsquo; Old Nan said quietly, &lsquo;what do <em>you</em> knows of fear? Fear is for the winter, my little lord, when the snows fall a hundred feet deep and the ice wind comes howling out of the north. Fear is for the long night, when the sun hides its face for years at a time, and little children are born and live and die all in darkness while the direwolves grow gaunt and hungry, and the white walkers move through the woods.&rsquo;&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption"><cite>Page 224</cite></div></div><p>And then there&rsquo;s Varys, who is wonderfully eloquent and comes at everything sidewise:</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;Ned had to know the rest. &lsquo;Who gave him the poison?&rsquo;</p>
<p>&ldquo;&lsquo;Some dear sweet friend who often shared meat and mead with him, no doubt. Oh but which one? There were may such. Lord Arryn was a kindly, trusting man.&rsquo; The eunuch sighed. &lsquo;There <em>was</em> one boy. All he was, he owed to Jon Arryn, but when the widow fled to the Eyrie with her household, he stayed in King&rsquo;s Landing and prospered. It always gladdens my heart to see the young rise in the world.&lsquo; The whip was in his voice again, every word a stroke. &lsquo;He must have cut a gallant figure in the tourney, him in his bright new armor, with those crescent moons on his cloak. A pity he died so untimely, before you could talk to him …&rsquo;&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption"><cite>Page 298</cite></div></div><p>Vary is very carefully telling Ned who he thinks poisoned the previous Hand. He is also subtly telling him that whoever put him up to the poisoning also had him taken care of afterward, at the tourney, in order to cover their own tracks. It had already been noted that the knight&rsquo;s gorget was improperly tied (likely not an accident but again a small favor paid for with Lannister gold) and Sandor Clegane (the Hound) had also already noted that his brother Gregor (the Mountain) had killed the other knight on purpose, him having been unlikely not to notice a loosely tied gorget, especially when his mistress the Queen had likely let him know to look for it.</p>
<p>Here&rsquo;s another example from later in the book:</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;[Ned speaking]&rsquo;Your own ends. What ends are those, Lord Varys?&rsquo;</p>
<p>&ldquo;&lsquo;Peace,&rsquo; Varys replied without hesitation. &lsquo;If there was one soul in King&rsquo;s Landing who was truly desperate to keep Robert Baratheon alive, it was me.&lsquo; He signed. &lsquo;For fifteen years I protected him from his enemies, but I could not protect him from his friends. What strange fit of madness led you to tell the queen that you had learned the truth of Joffrey&rsquo;s birth?;</p>
<p>&ldquo;&lsquo;The madness of mercy,&rsquo; Ned admitted.</p>
<p>&ldquo;&lsquo;Ah,&rsquo; said Varys. &lsquo;To be sure. You are an honest and honorable man, Lord Eddard. Ofttimes I forget that. I have met so few of them in my life.&rsquo; He glanced around the cell. &lsquo;When I see what honesty and honor have won you, I understand why.&rsquo;&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption"><cite>Page 571</cite></div></div><p>With Ned&rsquo;s admission, we see him for noble but possibly foolish, possibly stupid, but almost certainly naive person he is. How could he think that Cersei needed mercy? That she wouldn&rsquo;t use it to her own ends? It is to Varys&rsquo;s credit that he even kept talking to a man so unschooled in, well, in human nature.</p>
<p>That Ned could so completely misread the queen and underestimate her is what I see as Martin&rsquo;s way of saying that this is a book about women, rather than men. Though there are many whores and serving wenches in this book, the strong women are very strong—Catlin Stark, Danaerys Targaryan, Cersei Lannister. Ned is strong and just and loyal and noble, but his stupidity and utter failure to be able to read people and his inability to even suspect motives and goals that he himself could never have did untold damage. He was easily manipulated and thrown by the wayside by people ostensibly his inferior in every way—except for the ability to take an opportunity when it presents itself.</p>
<p>And Cersei&rsquo;s behavior can be interpreted as strength—she knows it&rsquo;s a man&rsquo;s world but she basically enslaves her son so that she can rule from behind the throne—or weakness—she babies her son almost as much as Lady Lysa Arryn of the Eyrie, ruining a potentially great man. Melisandre is also quite powerful and holds sway over a king. The classic scrappy and self-reliant character is Arya; the cripple is Bran.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The Western Market was a great square of beaten earth surrounded by warrens of mud-baked brick, animal pens, whitewashed drinking halls. Hummocks rose from the ground like the backs of great suberranean beasts breaking the surface, yawning black mouths leading down to cool and cavernou storerooms below. The interior of the square was a maze of stalls and crookback aisles, shaded by awnings of woven grass.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption"><cite>Page 530</cite></div></div><p>This is just a sample passage, but the scenery and locations are all described in this exquisite detail, with quite a light touch and flair for simile and metaphor.</p>
<p>Another one struck me from the end of the book, where a few words sufficed to put you <em>there</em>, in the woods, in the market, on the battlefield. Not to get too hyperbolic, but Martin&rsquo;s descriptions of troop movements, battles and the sheer confusion of war are easily the equal of Tolstoy&rsquo;s from <em>War and Peace</em>. I was impressed with Tolstoy&rsquo;s ability to evoke a scene vividly but am equally impressed by Martin&rsquo;s similar ability—I never felt lost and only occasionally consulted the map to straighten myself out on a point of geography. To be clear, Tolstoy&rsquo;s battles were almost universally portrayed as pointless and wasteful of human life and endeavor, whereas Martin allows himself the conceit that war can accomplish worthwhile deeds. One was a historian; the other is a fantasist.</p>
<p>It&rsquo;s a matter of taste and what for some is lovely, descriptive writing is, for others, boring and superfluous detail. The balance is hard to get right and 5% one way or another can lead to ruinous and embarrassing passages rather than praiseworthy prose. Your mileage may vary, but I quite like it, is what I&rsquo;m trying to say.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;The woods were full of whispers.</p>
<p>&ldquo;Moonlight winked on the tumbling waters of the stream below as it wound its rocky way along the floor of the valley. Beneath the trees, warhorses whickered softly and pawed at the moist, leafy ground, while men made nervous jests in hushed voices. Now and again, she heard the chink of spears, the faint metallic slither of chain mail, but even those sounds were muffled.&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption"><cite>Page 625</cite></div></div><p>And Martin&rsquo;s feel for dialogue and roguish, fun characters is a welcome relief from all of the gallant tedium of the Tolkien books. Don&rsquo;t get me wrong, I really, really liked reading those. I&rsquo;ve read them twice, in fact. No one would ever, ever, ever accuse Tolkien of being funny, though. Those books are unbroken tedium, whether fleeing from the shadow, mourning past woes or those to come or sitting through solemn and deep ceremonies. Nobody ever really got blasted or laid.</p>
<p>Here is a conversation between Bronn (a sellsword and one of the best characters) and Tyrion Lannister (another of the great characters). In this passage, Martin fills in more tantalizing detail about how awesome Bronn is while Tyrion questions him about the whore he&rsquo;d procured for him.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;Bronn was seated cross-legged under a chestnut tree, near where they&rsquo;d tied the horses. He was honing the edge of his sword, wide awake; the sellsword did not seem to sleep like other men. &lsquo;Where did you find her?&rsquo; Tyrion asked him as he pissed.</p>
<p>&ldquo;&lsquo;I took her from a knight. The man was loath to give her up, but your name changed his thinking somewhat…that, and my dirk at his throat.&rsquo;</p>
<p>&ldquo;&lsquo;Splendid,&rsquo; Tyrion said dryly, shaking off the last drops. &lsquo;I seem to recall saying <em>find me a whore,</em> not <em>make me an enemy.&rsquo;</em></p>
<p>&ldquo;&lsquo;The pretty ones were all claimed,&rsquo; Bronn said. &lsquo;I&rsquo;ll be pleased to take her back if you&rsquo;d prefer a toothless drab.&lsquo;</p>
<p>&ldquo;Tyrion limped closer to where he sat. &lsquo;My lord father would call that insolence, and send you to the mines for impertinence.&rsquo;</p>
<p>&ldquo;&lsquo;Good for me you&rsquo;re not your father,&lsquo; Bronn repied. &lsquo;I saw one with boils all over her nose. Would you like her?&rsquo;</p>
<p>&ldquo;&lsquo;What, and break your heart?&rsquo; Tyrion shot back. &lsquo;I shall keep Shae. Did you perchance note the <em>name</em> of this knight you took her from? I&rsquo;d rather not have him beside me in the battle.&lsquo;</p>
<p>&ldquo;Bronn rose, cat-quick and cat-graceful, turnin his sword in his hand. &lsquo;You&rsquo;ll have me beside you in the battle, dwarf.&lsquo;</p>
<p>&ldquo;Tyrion nodded. The night air was warm on his bare skin. &lsquo;See that I survive this battle, and you can name your reward.&rsquo;</p>
<p>&ldquo;Bronn tossed the longsword from his right hand to his left, and tried a cut. &lsquo;Who&rsquo;d want to kill the likes of you?&rsquo;</p>
<p>&ldquo;&lsquo;My lord father, for one. He&rsquo;s put me in the van[guard].&lsquo;</p>
<p>&ldquo;&lsquo;I&rsquo;d do the same. A small man with a big shield. You&rsquo;ll give the archers fits.&lsquo;</p>
<p>&ldquo;&lsquo;I find you oddly cheering,&rsquo; Tyrion said. &lsquo;I must be mad.&rsquo;</p>
<p>&ldquo;Bronn sheathed his sword. &lsquo;Beyond a doubt.&rsquo;&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption"><cite>Page 613–614</cite></div></div><p>From this passage alone, you realize what a great job they&rsquo;ve done with the casting and scripting for the TV show. I read all of Tyrion&rsquo;s dialogue in Peter Dinklage&rsquo;s voice. And Jerome Flynn&rsquo;s Bronn is indelibly burned into my brain.</p>
<p><hr></p>
<div class="footnote-reference"><span id="footnote_DRAFTABLE_ENTRY_3036_1_body" class="footnote-number">[1]</span> While the modern age saw fit to allow me to borrow books from a library halfway around the world and whisk them to my electronic book for a period of fourteen days, before the bits once again evaporated into the aether—no small stress that, to be sure, especially with an 800-page tome—it did not see fit to provide the content to me in a format from which I was deemed worthy of being able to copy content that I found interesting. Presumably, this is to prevent wholesale copying of copyrighted good, but this is, quite frankly, a ridiculous situation to in which to find ourselves in the year of 2014. Here we sit, atop a pile of information and accumulated wisdom, culture and knowledge—all potentially available at a moment&rsquo;s notice—and the paramount purpose is preëmptively assume that all consumers of this content are going to criminally benefit themselves, leaving the true generators of content to starve, despite their glorious contributions to humanity. The gods know our typing and spelling skills have only gotten worse—why make us waste so much time?</div>      </div>
      </div>
        <div class="footer">
    <div class="footer-data"><div class="footer-links"><ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/contact.php" title="">Contact</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/support.php" title="">Support</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/privacy.php" title="">Privacy</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/rights.php" title="">Rights</a></li></ul></div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="copyright">Copyright (c) 1999-2026 earthli.com. All Rights Reserved.</div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="versions">Powered by <ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore/app_news.php">earthli News 3.7</a></li><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore" title="">earthli WebCore&trade; 3.7</a></li></ul></div></div>    </div>
      </div>
  </div>  </body>
</html>
]]>
  </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
      <title type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[Snuff by Terry Pratchett (Read in 2014)]]>
  </title>
    <id>https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3088</id>
    <link href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3088"/>
    <updated>2015-03-29T19:34:53+02:00</updated>
    <author>
        <name type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[Marco von Ballmoos]]>
  </name>
      <uri>https://earthli.com/users/marco</uri>
    </author>
      <summary type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<blockquote class="quote abstract "><div>Disclaimer: these are notes I took while reading this book. They include citations I found interesting or enlightening or particularly well-written. In some cases, I&rsquo;ve pointed out which of these applies to which citation; in others, I have not. Any benefit you gain from reading these notes is... [<a class="complete-text-link" href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3088">More</a>]</div></blockquote>]]>
  </summary>
      <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<html lang="en">
  <head>
    <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/themes/ice.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/fonts/raleway.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/core/medium.css">
  </head>
  <body>
<div class="style-controls">  <div class="page">
    <div class="page-body">
<div class="info-box-top">
<p>
Published by <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_user.php?name=marco" title="Marco von Ballmoos" class="visible">marco</a> on <span class="date-time">29. Mar 2015 19:34:53 (GMT-5)</span>
</p>
</div>
      <div class="text-flow wide">
  <blockquote class="quote abstract "><div>Disclaimer: these are notes I took while reading this book. They include citations I found interesting or enlightening or particularly well-written. In some cases, I&rsquo;ve pointed out which of these applies to which citation; in others, I have not. Any benefit you gain from reading these notes is purely incidental to the purpose they serve of reminding me what I once read. Please see Wikipedia for a summary if I&rsquo;ve failed to provide one sufficient for your purposes. If my notes serve to trigger an interest in this book, then I&rsquo;m happy for you.</div></blockquote><h2>Citations</h2><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;‘In short, Drumknott, a certain amount of harmless banditry amongst the lower classes is to be smiled upon if not actively encouraged, for the health of the city, but what should we do when the highborn and wealthy take to crime? Indeed, if a poor man will spend a year in prison for stealing out of hunger, how high would the gallows need to be to hang the rich man who breaks the law out of greed?’&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Pos. 200-202 by <cite>Vetinari</cite></div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Lady Sybil examined a sherry bottle and topped up her glass. ‘Surely you don’t think that the blacksmith really had the right to fight you for this house?’ Sam wished that he could drink, right now. ‘No, of course not. I mean, there wouldn’t be an end to it. People have been winning and losing on the old roulette wheel of fate for thousands of years. I know that, but you know that I think that if you’re going to stop the wheel then you have to spare some thought for the poor buggers who’re sitting on zero.’&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Pos. 1543–1548</div></div><p>It&rsquo;s all well and good to end violent takeover but that suggestion always comes from those who&rsquo;ve just won.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;A copper should always be willing to learn, and Vimes had learned from Lord Vetinari that you should never react to any comment or situation until you had decided exactly what you were going to do. This had the dual attraction of preventing you from saying or doing the wrong thing while at the same time making other people extremely nervous.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Pos. 1731–1733</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;But he didn’t have to give the man anything, and in those days a whole half-dollar was probably more money than the old man could imagine! Once Sybil, in one of their very infrequent arguments, had surprised him by blurting out, ‘Well, Sam, my family got its start in life, its grub stake if you like, by piracy. You should like that, Sam! Good honest manual labour! And look what it led to! The trouble with you, Sam Vimes, is that you’re determined to be your very own class enemy.’&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Pos. 1854–1858</div></div><p>This changes nothing about a situation in which some have so much and others so little. Why are some given the opportunity to exhibit largesse by distributing crumbs, an act which does not negatively impact them. and why must all the others hope for largesse?</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;You apply one law for the poor and none for the rich, my dear, because the poor are such a nuisance.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Pos. 2031</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Vimes turned a corner and there were the goblins. He was glad that young Feeney couldn’t see them. Strictly speaking, Vimes wished he couldn’t see them either. There must have been a hundred of them, many of them holding weapons. They were crude weapons, to be sure, but a flint axe hitting your head does not need a degree in physics.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Pos. 2273–2276</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Vimes stared at the rugged face that only a mother could tolerate and perhaps love, searching for any sign of anger or grief. There was just a sense of sorrow and hopeless resignation at the fact that the world was as it was and always would be and there was nothing that could be done. The goblin was a sigh on legs. In dejection he looked up at Vimes and said, ‘They used to send hungry dogs into the cave, Mister Po-leess-maan. Those were good days; we ate well.’&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Pos. 2458–2461</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Oh dear, you of all people must recognize a substition when you’re possessed by it? It’s the opposite of a superstition: it’s real even if you don’t believe in it.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Pos. 2947–2948</div></div>      </div>
      </div>
        <div class="footer">
    <div class="footer-data"><div class="footer-links"><ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/contact.php" title="">Contact</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/support.php" title="">Support</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/privacy.php" title="">Privacy</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/rights.php" title="">Rights</a></li></ul></div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="copyright">Copyright (c) 1999-2026 earthli.com. All Rights Reserved.</div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="versions">Powered by <ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore/app_news.php">earthli News 3.7</a></li><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore" title="">earthli WebCore&trade; 3.7</a></li></ul></div></div>    </div>
      </div>
  </div>  </body>
</html>
]]>
  </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
      <title type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[The Long Earth by Terry Pratchett & Stephen Baxter (Read in 2014)]]>
  </title>
    <id>https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3087</id>
    <link href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3087"/>
    <updated>2015-03-29T19:32:53+02:00</updated>
    <author>
        <name type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[Marco von Ballmoos]]>
  </name>
      <uri>https://earthli.com/users/marco</uri>
    </author>
      <summary type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<blockquote class="quote abstract "><div>Disclaimer: these are notes I took while reading this book. They include citations I found interesting or enlightening or particularly well-written. In some cases, I&rsquo;ve pointed out which of these applies to which citation; in others, I have not. Any benefit you gain from reading these notes is... [<a class="complete-text-link" href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3087">More</a>]</div></blockquote>]]>
  </summary>
      <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<html lang="en">
  <head>
    <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/themes/ice.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/fonts/raleway.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/core/medium.css">
  </head>
  <body>
<div class="style-controls">  <div class="page">
    <div class="page-body">
<div class="info-box-top">
<p>
Published by <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_user.php?name=marco" title="Marco von Ballmoos" class="visible">marco</a> on <span class="date-time">29. Mar 2015 19:32:53 (GMT-5)</span>
</p>
<p>
Updated by <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_user.php?name=marco" title="Marco von Ballmoos" class="visible">marco</a> on <span class="date-time">23. Mar 2025 21:45:54 (GMT-5)</span>
</p>
</div>
      <div class="text-flow wide">
  <blockquote class="quote abstract "><div>Disclaimer: these are notes I took while reading this book. They include citations I found interesting or enlightening or particularly well-written. In some cases, I&rsquo;ve pointed out which of these applies to which citation; in others, I have not. Any benefit you gain from reading these notes is purely incidental to the purpose they serve of reminding me what I once read. Please see Wikipedia for a summary if I&rsquo;ve failed to provide one sufficient for your purposes. If my notes serve to trigger an interest in this book, then I&rsquo;m happy for you.</div></blockquote><p>This is the story of a near-future Earth where alternate universes are just a “step” away. Each is a complete Earth, most of which are almost entirely unpopulated. Some people can step with a gadget, others without one and others can’t step at all, remaining “trapped” on the mainline Earth. The story introduces this situation, provides some examples and then sends Joshua—a natural stepper—on an adventure far up the long line of Earths, accompanied by an AI named Lobsang. As usual, Baxter’s parts are technologically solid, but immediately recognizable for his wooden characterizations. Similarly, Pratchett’s style shines through in a few lovely, though shorter, chapters. It was good fun; recommended.</p>
<h2>Citations</h2><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Joshua, always remember, you have not travelled back in time, or forward. You have travelled far across the contingency tree of the possible, on a planet where dramatic but quasi-random extinction events periodically obliterate much of the family of life, leaving room for evolutionary innovation. On each Earth, however, the outcomes will differ, by a little or a lot…&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Pos. 3183-3186</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;I am giving mankind the key to endless worlds. An end to scarcity and, may we hope, war. And perhaps a new meaning to life. I leave the exploration of all these worlds to your generation, my dear, though personally I think you will fuck it up royally.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Pos. 3324-3325</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;They resent the Long Earth and those who travel it, and all that this great opening-up has brought. And those who are losing money, in the new order of things. There are always plenty of those…’&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Pos. 3409-3411</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The French, for example, declared that all the French footprints were available for colonization by anybody who wanted to be French, and was prepared to accept a carefully put together document which outlined what being French meant. It was a brave idea, slightly let down by the fact that despite a nationwide debate it appeared that no two Frenchmen could agree exactly on what being French did mean. Although another school of thought held that arguing about what made you French was part of what made you French.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Pos. 3436-3440</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Modesty is only arrogance by stealth.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Pos. 3779</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;As an engineer I find it all hard to believe. But as a Buddhist, I accept there are more ways to think about the universe than one can imagine.’ ‘I sincerely hope we are not going to start talking religion,’ said Sally sharply. ‘Open your mind, Sally. It’s only another framework for understanding the universe, just another tool.’ ‘So what does that make Joshua?’ she snapped back. ‘The chosen one?’&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Pos. 4624-4628</div></div>      </div>
      </div>
        <div class="footer">
    <div class="footer-data"><div class="footer-links"><ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/contact.php" title="">Contact</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/support.php" title="">Support</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/privacy.php" title="">Privacy</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/rights.php" title="">Rights</a></li></ul></div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="copyright">Copyright (c) 1999-2026 earthli.com. All Rights Reserved.</div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="versions">Powered by <ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore/app_news.php">earthli News 3.7</a></li><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore" title="">earthli WebCore&trade; 3.7</a></li></ul></div></div>    </div>
      </div>
  </div>  </body>
</html>
]]>
  </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
      <title type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[Raising Steam by Terry Pratchett (Read in 2014)]]>
  </title>
    <id>https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3086</id>
    <link href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3086"/>
    <updated>2015-03-29T19:30:16+02:00</updated>
    <author>
        <name type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[Marco von Ballmoos]]>
  </name>
      <uri>https://earthli.com/users/marco</uri>
    </author>
      <summary type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<blockquote class="quote abstract "><div>Disclaimer: these are notes I took while reading this book. They include citations I found interesting or enlightening or particularly well-written. In some cases, I&rsquo;ve pointed out which of these applies to which citation; in others, I have not. Any benefit you gain from reading these notes is... [<a class="complete-text-link" href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3086">More</a>]</div></blockquote>]]>
  </summary>
      <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<html lang="en">
  <head>
    <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/themes/ice.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/fonts/raleway.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/core/medium.css">
  </head>
  <body>
<div class="style-controls">  <div class="page">
    <div class="page-body">
<div class="info-box-top">
<p>
Published by <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_user.php?name=marco" title="Marco von Ballmoos" class="visible">marco</a> on <span class="date-time">29. Mar 2015 19:30:16 (GMT-5)</span>
</p>
<p>
Updated by <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_user.php?name=marco" title="Marco von Ballmoos" class="visible">marco</a> on <span class="date-time">29. Mar 2015 19:33:11 (GMT-5)</span>
</p>
</div>
      <div class="text-flow wide">
  <blockquote class="quote abstract "><div>Disclaimer: these are notes I took while reading this book. They include citations I found interesting or enlightening or particularly well-written. In some cases, I&rsquo;ve pointed out which of these applies to which citation; in others, I have not. Any benefit you gain from reading these notes is purely incidental to the purpose they serve of reminding me what I once read. Please see Wikipedia for a summary if I&rsquo;ve failed to provide one sufficient for your purposes. If my notes serve to trigger an interest in this book, then I&rsquo;m happy for you.</div></blockquote><h2>Citations</h2><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;He thought, what would happen if goblins learned everything about humans and did everything the human way because they thought it was better than the goblin way? How long would it be before they were no longer goblins and left behind everything that was goblin, even their pots? The pots were lovely, he’d bought several for his mum. Goblins took pots seriously now, they sparkled, even at night, but what happens next? Will goblins really stop taking an interest in their pots and will humans learn the serious, valuable and difficult and almost magical skill of pot-making? Or will goblins become, well, just another kind of human? And which would be better? And then he thought, maybe a policeman should stop thinking about all this because, after all, there was no crime, nothing was wrong … and yet in a subtle way, there was. Something was being stolen from the world without anybody noticing or caring.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Pos. 3056–3057</div></div>      </div>
      </div>
        <div class="footer">
    <div class="footer-data"><div class="footer-links"><ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/contact.php" title="">Contact</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/support.php" title="">Support</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/privacy.php" title="">Privacy</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/rights.php" title="">Rights</a></li></ul></div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="copyright">Copyright (c) 1999-2026 earthli.com. All Rights Reserved.</div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="versions">Powered by <ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore/app_news.php">earthli News 3.7</a></li><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore" title="">earthli WebCore&trade; 3.7</a></li></ul></div></div>    </div>
      </div>
  </div>  </body>
</html>
]]>
  </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
      <title type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[Dracula by Bram Stoker (Read in 2014)]]>
  </title>
    <id>https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3021</id>
    <link href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3021"/>
    <updated>2015-03-29T19:29:15+02:00</updated>
    <author>
        <name type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[Marco von Ballmoos]]>
  </name>
      <uri>https://earthli.com/users/marco</uri>
    </author>
      <summary type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<blockquote class="quote abstract "><div>Disclaimer: these are notes I took while reading this book. They include citations I found interesting or enlightening or particularly well-written. In some cases, I&rsquo;ve pointed out which of these applies to which citation; in others, I have not. Any benefit you gain from reading these notes is... [<a class="complete-text-link" href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3021">More</a>]</div></blockquote>]]>
  </summary>
      <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<html lang="en">
  <head>
    <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/themes/ice.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/fonts/raleway.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/core/medium.css">
  </head>
  <body>
<div class="style-controls">  <div class="page">
    <div class="page-body">
<div class="info-box-top">
<p>
Published by <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_user.php?name=marco" title="Marco von Ballmoos" class="visible">marco</a> on <span class="date-time">29. Mar 2015 19:29:15 (GMT-5)</span>
</p>
<p>
Updated by <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_user.php?name=marco" title="Marco von Ballmoos" class="visible">marco</a> on <span class="date-time">29. Mar 2015 19:33:23 (GMT-5)</span>
</p>
</div>
      <div class="text-flow wide">
  <blockquote class="quote abstract "><div>Disclaimer: these are notes I took while reading this book. They include citations I found interesting or enlightening or particularly well-written. In some cases, I&rsquo;ve pointed out which of these applies to which citation; in others, I have not. Any benefit you gain from reading these notes is purely incidental to the purpose they serve of reminding me what I once read. Please see Wikipedia for a summary if I&rsquo;ve failed to provide one sufficient for your purposes. If my notes serve to trigger an interest in this book, then I&rsquo;m happy for you.</div></blockquote><h2>Notes</h2><p>This book charges out of the gate and is quite enthralling—no pun intended—in a very modern way. Unfortunately, after the whole merry band of characters is introduced and expertly knit together, the book bogs down in professions of fealty and undying love and respect and myriad other forms of swearing undying and lifelong allegiance to one another.</p>
<p>There is also the not easily overlooked heavily misogynistic aspect of the novel. The ladies Lucy and Mina are introduced as very clever and very capable, <em>for ladies</em>. That is, the females make the most of their the paucity of gray matter with which the good Lord blessed them. Stoker makes sure to let the inadequacy of the female thinking capacity be extensively explained by the women of his novel themselves.</p>
<p>They are not the only ones who suffer thusly. Dracula is, as well, not considered very clever and possessed of only a <em>child brain</em>.</p>
<p>The group of gentlemen was perhaps revolutionary at the time, but is now somewhat trite: a doctor in charge of an insane asylum (Dr. Seward), a Renaissance man, well-learned in all manner of arcane minutiae who also happens to be well-acquainted with the dark corners of the occult, Dr. Van Helsing, a brave, competent and not unwealthy Texan in the form of Quincey Morris, a Lord Gondalming (Arthur Holmwood) who throws money and influence about and, finally, Jonathan Harker, a lawyer who just happened to have come into a magnificent inheritance. The two ladies are, of course, more beautiful than anything this side of the angels.</p>
<p>I liked quite a few passages in this book, but almost nothing of the second half wherein the hunt for Dracula mostly takes place. The hunters are, for the sake of the story, sometimes almost inordinately stupid and unobservant, so that Dracula continues to get the upper hand much longer than he should. But this lack of putting quite obvious clues together—or perhaps more charitably, <em>forgetfulness</em>—would go on to become a staple of the modern Western genre that Stoker would help found.</p>
<p>Part of the tediousness of the book lies not in the tale itself or in the characters but in the voices used to tell it. Some of the passages are challengingly written in very coarse dialect but are sufficiently pregnable to be utterly rewarding and enjoyable. I speak of many of the minor characters interrogated by our merry band in their pursuit of Dracula. On the other hand, the eminently readable but grammatically horrifying prose of Van Helsing left me completely cold. Endless pages torn from his journal written in what I must assume is how Stoker thought an at-times flustered Dutch master of the occult would write or speak.</p>
<p>Almost equally tedious were the long passages by the women—and less occasionally by the men—thanking God over and over for the chance to be good and to survive in order to be able to more capably serve both Him and man. Or their men. Or whatever.</p>
<h2>Citations:</h2><p>I can&rsquo;t imagine how this passage must have read in an England utterly steeped in its Victorain prudishness. It&rsquo;s quite well-written and holds up surprisingly well.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;All three had brilliant white teeth that shone like pearls against the ruby of their voluptuous lips. There was something about them that made me uneasy, some longing and at the same time some deadly fear. I felt in my heart a wicked, burning desire that they would kiss me with those red lips. It is not good to note this down, lest some day it should meet Mina&rsquo;s eyes and cause her pain, but it is the truth. They whispered together, and then they all three laughed, such a silvery, musical laugh, but as hard as though the sound never could have come through the softness of human lips. It was like the intolerable, tingling sweetness of water-glasses when played on by a cunning hand. The fair girl shook her head coquettishly, and the other two urged her on.</p>
<p>&ldquo;One said, &ldquo;Go on! You are first, and we shall follow. Yours is the right to begin.&rdquo;</p>
<p>&ldquo;The other added, &ldquo;He is young and strong. There are kisses for us all.&rdquo;</p>
<p>&ldquo;I lay quiet, looking out from under my eyelashes in an agony of delightful anticipation. The fair girl advanced and bent over me till I could feel “the movement of her breath upon me. Sweet it was in one sense, honey-sweet, and sent the same tingling through the nerves as her voice, but with a bitter underlying the sweet, a bitter offensiveness, as one smells in blood.</p>
<p>&ldquo;I was afraid to raise my eyelids, but looked out and saw perfectly under the lashes. The girl went on her knees, and bent over me, simply gloating. There was a deliberate voluptuousness which was both thrilling and repulsive, and as she arched her neck she actually licked her lips like an animal, till I could see in the moonlight the moisture shining on the scarlet lips and on the red tongue as it lapped the white sharp teeth. Lower and lower went her head as the lips went below the range of my mouth and chin and seemed to fasten on my throat. Then she paused, and I could hear the churning sound of her tongue as it licked her teeth and lips, and I could feel the hot breath on my neck. Then the skin of my throat began to tingle as one&rsquo;s flesh does when the hand that is to tickle it approaches nearer, nearer “. I could feel the soft, shivering touch of the lips on the super-sensitive skin of my throat, and the hard dents of two sharp teeth, just touching and pausing there. I closed my eyes in languorous ecstasy and waited, waited with beating heart.&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption"><cite>Page 48</cite></div></div><p>Or this eerie scene in which Harker confronts the Count for the first time.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;Then I stopped and looked at the Count. There was a mocking smile on the bloated face which seemed to drive me mad. This was the being I was helping to transfer to London, where, perhaps, for centuries to come he might, amongst its teeming millions, satiate his lust for blood, and create a new and ever-widening circle of semi-demons to batten on the helpless.</p>
<p>&ldquo;The very thought drove me mad. A terrible desire came upon me to rid the world of such a monster. There was no lethal weapon at hand, but I seized a shovel which the workmen had been using to fill the cases, and lifting it high, struck, with the edge downward, at the hateful face. But as I did so the head turned, and the eyes fell upon me, with all their blaze of basilisk horror. The sight seemed to paralyze me, and the shovel turned in my hand and glanced from the face, merely making a deep gash above the forehead. The shovel fell from my hand across the box, and as I pulled it away the flange of the blade caught the edge of the lid which fell over again “, and hid the horrid thing from my sight. The last glimpse I had was of the bloated face, blood-stained and fixed with a grin of malice which would have held its own in the nethermost hell.&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption"><cite>Page 48</cite></div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;“White, wet clouds, which swept by in ghostly fashion, so dank and damp and cold that it needed but little effort of imagination to think that the spirits of those lost at sea were touching their living brethren with the clammy hands of death, and many a one shuddered as the wreaths of sea-mist swept by.</p>
<p>&ldquo;At times the mist cleared, and the sea for some distance could be seen in the glare of the lightning, which came thick and fast, followed by such peals of thunder that the whole sky overhead seemed trembling under the shock of the footsteps of the storm.</p>
<p>&ldquo;Some of the scenes thus revealed were of immeasurable grandeur and of absorbing interest. The sea, running mountains high, threw skywards with each wave mighty masses of white foam, which the tempest seemed to snatch at and whirl away into space. Here and there a fishing boat, with a rag of sail, running madly for shelter before the blast, now and again the white wings of a storm-tossed seabird. On the summit of the East Cliff the new searchlight was ready for experiment, but had not yet been tried. The officers in charge of “it got it into working order, and in the pauses of onrushing mist swept with it the surface of the sea. Once or twice its service was most effective, as when a fishing boat, with gunwale under water, rushed into the harbour, able, by the guidance of the sheltering light, to avoid the danger of dashing against the piers. As each boat achieved the safety of the port there was a shout of joy from the mass of people on the shore, a shout which for a moment seemed to cleave the gale and was then swept away in its rush.&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption"><cite>Page 70–71</cite></div></div><p>A lovely sign-off for a letter, asking for haste:</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Pray do not take us as exceeding the bounds of business courtesy in pressing you in all ways to use the utmost expedition.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>Or this bit:</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;“He went to the door and opened it, a most unnecessary proceeding it seemed to me. I have always thought that a wild animal never looks so well as when some obstacle of pronounced durability is between us. A personal experience has intensified rather than diminished that idea.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>More horror:</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;[…] far down the avenue of yews we saw a white figure advance, a dim white figure, which held something dark at its breast. The figure stopped, and at the moment a ray of moonlight fell upon the masses of driving clouds, and showed in startling prominence a dark-haired woman, dressed in the cerements of the grave. We could not see the face, for it was bent down over what we saw to be a fair-haired child. There was a pause and a sharp little cry, such as a child gives in sleep, or a dog as it lies before the fire and dreams. […] as we looked the white figure moved forwards again. It was now near enough for us to see clearly, and the moonlight still held. My own heart grew cold as ice, and I could hear the gasp of Arthur, as we recognized the features of Lucy Westenra. Lucy Westenra, but yet how changed. The sweetness was turned to adamantine, heartless cruelty, and the purity to voluptuous wantonness.</p>
<p>&ldquo;[…] By the concentrated light that fell on Lucy&rsquo;s face we could see that the lips were crimson with fresh blood, and that the stream had trickled over her chin and stained the purity of her lawn death-robe.&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote><h2>Errata</h2><p>When I read books that I downloaded from <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org">Gutenberg Project</a>, I like to be helpful and provide corrections where I can. They have a very friendly and responsive errata-submission system.</p>
<pre class=" ">Title: Dracula, by Bram Stoker
      May 9, 2008 [EBook #345]
File:  pg345.epub

Page 99:
 she demurred at first&amp;dash;I know why, old man&amp;dash;she finally consented
   Replace &ldquo;&amp;dash;” with an un-escaped entity; at first-I know why, old man-she</pre>      </div>
      </div>
        <div class="footer">
    <div class="footer-data"><div class="footer-links"><ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/contact.php" title="">Contact</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/support.php" title="">Support</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/privacy.php" title="">Privacy</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/rights.php" title="">Rights</a></li></ul></div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="copyright">Copyright (c) 1999-2026 earthli.com. All Rights Reserved.</div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="versions">Powered by <ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore/app_news.php">earthli News 3.7</a></li><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore" title="">earthli WebCore&trade; 3.7</a></li></ul></div></div>    </div>
      </div>
  </div>  </body>
</html>
]]>
  </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
      <title type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[Moby Dick; or, The Whale by Herman Melville (Read in 2014)]]>
  </title>
    <id>https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3011</id>
    <link href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3011"/>
    <updated>2015-03-29T19:26:56+02:00</updated>
    <author>
        <name type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[Marco von Ballmoos]]>
  </name>
      <uri>https://earthli.com/users/marco</uri>
    </author>
      <summary type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<blockquote class="quote abstract "><div>Disclaimer: these are notes I took while reading this book. They include citations I found interesting or enlightening or particularly well-written. In some cases, I&rsquo;ve pointed out which of these applies to which citation; in others, I have not. Any benefit you gain from reading these notes is... [<a class="complete-text-link" href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3011">More</a>]</div></blockquote>]]>
  </summary>
      <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<html lang="en">
  <head>
    <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/themes/ice.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/fonts/raleway.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/core/medium.css">
  </head>
  <body>
<div class="style-controls">  <div class="page">
    <div class="page-body">
<div class="info-box-top">
<p>
Published by <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_user.php?name=marco" title="Marco von Ballmoos" class="visible">marco</a> on <span class="date-time">29. Mar 2015 19:26:56 (GMT-5)</span>
</p>
<p>
Updated by <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_user.php?name=marco" title="Marco von Ballmoos" class="visible">marco</a> on <span class="date-time">17. May 2015 17:19:06 (GMT-5)</span>
</p>
</div>
      <div class="text-flow wide">
  <blockquote class="quote abstract "><div>Disclaimer: these are notes I took while reading this book. They include citations I found interesting or enlightening or particularly well-written. In some cases, I&rsquo;ve pointed out which of these applies to which citation; in others, I have not. Any benefit you gain from reading these notes is purely incidental to the purpose they serve of reminding me what I once read. Please see Wikipedia for a summary if I&rsquo;ve failed to provide one sufficient for your purposes. If my notes serve to trigger an interest in this book, then I&rsquo;m happy for you.</div></blockquote><h2>Notes</h2><p>The impression I got of this work when I tried reading it as a teenager caused me to avoid reading it as an adult, until now. This is a pity because it is, for the most part, a wonderfully written and action-packed tale that puts you remarkably into the heart of a dangerous profession like whaling with a vividness I didn&rsquo;t think possible. The descriptions of the action are as visceral as Tolstoy&rsquo;s.</p>
<h2>Citations</h2><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;What of it, if some old hunks of a sea-captain orders me to get a broom and sweep down the decks? What does that indignity amount to, weighed, I mean, in the scales of the New Testament? Do you think the archangel Gabriel thinks anything the less of me, because I promptly and respectfully obey that old hunks in that particular instance? Who ain&rsquo;t a slave? Tell me that. Well, then, however the old sea-captains may order me about—however they may thump and punch me about, I have the satisfaction of knowing that it is all right; that everybody else is one way or other served in much the same way—either in a physical or metaphysical point of view, that is; and so the universal thump is passed round, and all hands should rub each other&rsquo;s shoulder-blades, and be content.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption"><cite>Page 19–20</cite></div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Gaining the more open water, the bracing breeze waxed fresh; the little Moss tossed the quick foam from her bows, as a young colt his snortings. How I snuffed that Tartar air!—how I spurned that turnpike earth!—that common highway all over dented with the marks of slavish heels and hoofs; and turned me to admire the magnanimity of the sea which will permit no records.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption"><cite>Page 70</cite></div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;She was a thing of trophies. A cannibal of a craft, tricking herself forth in the chased bones of her enemies. All round, her unpanelled, open bulwarks were garnished like one continuous jaw, with the long sharp teeth of the sperm whale, inserted there for pins, to fasten her old hempen thews and tendons to. Those thews ran not through base blocks of land wood, but deftly travelled over sheaves of sea-ivory. Scorning a turnstile wheel at her reverend helm, she sported there a tiller; and that tiller was in one mass, curiously carved from the long narrow lower jaw of her hereditary foe.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption"><cite>Page 79</cite></div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Know ye now, Bulkington? Glimpses do ye seem to see of that mortally intolerable truth; that all deep, earnest thinking is but the intrepid effort of the soul to keep the open independence of her sea; while the wildest winds of heaven and earth conspire to cast her on the treacherous, slavish shore?&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption"><cite>Page 101</cite></div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;He lived in the world, as the last of the Grisly Bears lived in settled Missouri. And as when Spring and Summer had departed, that <strong>wild Logan of the woods</strong>, burying himself in the hollow of a tree, lived out the winter there, sucking his own paws; so, in his inclement, howling old age, Ahab&rsquo;s soul, shut up in the caved trunk of his body, there fed upon the sullen paws of its gloom!&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption"><cite>Page 133</cite></div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;D&rsquo;ye mark him, Flask?&rdquo; whispered Stubb; &ldquo;the chick that&rsquo;s in him pecks the shell. &lsquo;Twill soon be out.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption"><cite>Page 160</cite></div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Judge, then, to what pitches of inflamed, distracted fury the minds of his more desperate hunters were impelled, when amid the chips of chewed boats, and the sinking limbs of torn comrades, they swam out of the white curds of the whale&rsquo;s direful wrath into the serene, exasperating sunlight, that smiled on, as if at a birth or a bridal.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption"><cite>Page 178–179</cite></div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Human madness is oftentimes a cunning and most feline thing. When you think it fled, it may have but become transfigured into some still subtler form. Ahab&rsquo;s full lunacy subsided not, but deepeningly contracted; like the unabated Hudson, when that noble Northman flows narrowly, but unfathomably through the Highland gorge. But, as in his narrow-flowing monomania, not one jot of Ahab&rsquo;s broad madness had been left behind; so in that broad madness, not one jot of his great natural intellect had perished. That before living agent, now became the living instrument. If such a furious trope may stand, his special lunacy stormed his general sanity, and carried it, and turned all its concentred cannon upon its own mad mark; so that far from having lost his strength, Ahab, to that one end, did now possess a thousand fold more potency than ever he had sanely brought to bear upon any one reasonable object.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption"><cite>180–181</cite></div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;And when we consider that other theory of the natural philosophers, that all other earthly hues—every stately or lovely emblazoning—the sweet tinges of sunset skies and woods; yea, and the gilded velvets of butterflies, and the butterfly cheeks of young girls; all these are but subtile deceits, not actually inherent in substances, but only laid on from without; so that all deified Nature absolutely paints like the harlot, whose allurements cover nothing but the charnel-house within; and when we proceed further, and consider that the mystical cosmetic which produces every one of her hues, the great principle of light, for ever remains white or colourless in itself, and if operating without medium upon matter, would touch all objects, even tulips and roses, with its own blank tinge—pondering all this, the palsied universe lies before us a leper; and like wilful travellers in Lapland, who refuse to wear coloured and colouring glasses upon their eyes, so the wretched infidel gazes himself blind at the monumental white shroud that wraps all the prospect around him. And of all these things the Albino whale was the symbol.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption"><cite>Page 191–192</cite></div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Therefore, the tormented spirit that glared out of bodily eyes, when what seemed Ahab rushed from his room, was for the time but a vacated thing, a formless somnambulistic being, a ray of living light, to be sure, but without an object to colour, and therefore a blankness in itself. God help thee, old man, thy thoughts have created a creature in thee; and he whose intense thinking thus makes him a Prometheus; a vulture feeds upon that heart for ever; that vulture the very creature he creates.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption"><cite>Page 197</cite></div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Those tiger yellow creatures of his seemed all steel and whalebone; like five trip-hammers they rose and fell with regular strokes of strength, which periodically started the boat along the water like a horizontal burst boiler out of a Mississippi steamer. As for Fedallah, who was seen pulling the harpooneer oar, he had thrown aside his black jacket, and displayed his naked chest with the whole part of his body above the gunwale, clearly cut against the alternating depressions of the watery horizon; while at the other end of the boat Ahab, with one arm, like a fencer&rsquo;s, thrown half backward into the air, as if to counterbalance any tendency to trip; […]&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption"><cite>Page 214–215</cite></div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Only the infidel sharks in the audacious seas may give ear to such words, when, with tornado brow, and eyes of red murder, and foam-glued lips, Ahab leaped after his prey.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption"><cite>Page 218</cite></div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;[…] those insulated, immemorial, unalterable countries, which even in these modern days still preserve much of the ghostly aboriginalness of earth&rsquo;s primal generations, when the memory of the first man was a distinct recollection, and all men his descendants, unknowing whence he came, eyed each other as real phantoms, and asked of the sun and the moon why they were created and to what end; when though, according to Genesis, the angels indeed consorted with the daughters of men, the devils also, add the uncanonical Rabbins, indulged in mundane amours.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption"><cite>Page 225</cite></div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Few or no words were spoken; and the silent ship, as if manned by painted sailors in wax, day after day tore on through all the swift madness and gladness of the demoniac waves. By night the same muteness of humanity before the shrieks of the ocean prevailed; still in silence the men swung in the bowlines; still wordless Ahab stood up to the blast. Even when wearied nature seemed demanding repose he would not seek that repose in his hammock.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption"><cite>Page 228</cite></div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;[…] this craft was bleached like the skeleton of a stranded walrus. All down her sides, this spectral appearance was traced with long channels of reddened rust, while all her spars and her rigging were like the thick branches of trees furred over with hoar-frost. Only her lower sails were set. A wild sight it was to see her long-bearded look-outs at those three mast-heads. They seemed clad in the skins of beasts, so torn and bepatched the raiment that had survived nearly four years of cruising. Standing in iron hoops nailed to the mast, they swayed and swung over a fathomless sea; […]&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption"><cite>Page 228-229</cite></div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Of all divers, thou hast dived the deepest. That head upon which the upper sun now gleams, has moved amid this world&rsquo;s foundations. Where unrecorded names and navies rust, and untold hopes and anchors rot; where in her murderous hold this frigate earth is ballasted with bones of millions of the drowned; there, in that awful water-land, there was thy most familiar home.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption"><cite>Page 297</cite></div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Few are the foreheads which like Shakespeare&rsquo;s or Melancthon&rsquo;s rise so high, and descend so low, that the eyes themselves seem clear, eternal, tideless mountain lakes; and all above them in the forehead&rsquo;s wrinkles, you seem to track the antlered thoughts descending there to drink, as the Highland hunters track the snow prints of the deer.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption"><cite>Page 328</cite></div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;I tell ye what it is, men&rdquo;—cried Stubb to his crew—&rdquo;it&rsquo;s against my religion to get mad; but I&rsquo;d like to eat that villainous Yarman—Pull—won&rsquo;t ye? Are ye going to let that rascal beat ye? Do ye love brandy? A hogshead of brandy, then, to the best man. Come, why don&rsquo;t some of ye burst a blood-vessel? Who&rsquo;s that been dropping an anchor overboard—we don&rsquo;t budge an inch—we&rsquo;re becalmed. Halloo, here&rsquo;s grass growing in the boat&rsquo;s bottom—and by the Lord, the mast there&rsquo;s budding. This won&rsquo;t do, boys. Look at that Yarman! The short and long of it is, men, will ye spit fire or not?&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption"><cite>333–334</cite></div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;But the monster&rsquo;s run was a brief one. Giving a sudden gasp, he tumultuously sounded. With a grating rush, the three lines flew round the loggerheads with such a force as to gouge deep grooves in them; while so fearful were the harpooneers that this rapid sounding would soon exhaust the lines, that using all their dexterous might, they caught repeated smoking turns with the rope to hold on; till at last—owing to the perpendicular strain from the lead-lined chocks of the boats, whence the three ropes went straight down into the blue—the gunwales of the bows were almost even with the water, while the three sterns tilted high in the air.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption"><cite>Page 336–337</cite></div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;As the three boats lay there on that gently rolling sea, gazing down into its eternal blue noon; and as not a single groan or cry of any sort, nay, not so much as a ripple or a bubble came up from its depths; what landsman would have thought, that beneath all that silence and placidity, the utmost monster of the seas was writhing and wrenching in agony! Not eight inches of perpendicular rope were visible at the bows. Seems it credible that by three such thin threads the great Leviathan was suspended like the big weight to an eight day clock.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption"><cite>Page 337</cite></div></div><p><span id="poor-old-whale"></span></p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;As the boats now more closely surrounded him, the whole upper part of his form, with much of it that is ordinarily submerged, was plainly revealed. His eyes, or rather the places where his eyes had been, were beheld. As strange misgrown masses gather in the knot-holes of the noblest oaks when prostrate, so from the points which the whale&rsquo;s eyes had once occupied, now protruded blind bulbs, horribly pitiable to see. But pity there was none. For all his old age, and his one arm, and his blind eyes, he must die the death and be murdered, in order to light the gay bridals and other merry-makings of men, and also to illuminate the solemn churches that preach unconditional inoffensiveness by all to all. Still rolling in his blood, at last he partially disclosed a strangely discoloured bunch or protuberance, the size of a bushel, low down on the flank.</p>
<p>&ldquo;A nice spot,&ldquo; cried Flask; &ldquo;just let me prick him there once.&rdquo;</p>
<p>&ldquo;Avast!&rdquo; cried Starbuck, &ldquo;there&rsquo;s no need of that!&rdquo;</p>
<p>&ldquo;But humane Starbuck was too late. At the instant of the dart an ulcerous jet shot from this cruel wound, and goaded by it into more “than sufferable anguish, the whale now spouting thick blood, with swift fury blindly darted at the craft, bespattering them and their glorying crews all over with showers of gore, capsizing Flask&rsquo;s boat and marring the bows. It was his death stroke. For, by this time, so spent was he by loss of blood, that he helplessly rolled away from the wreck he had made; lay panting on his side, impotently flapped with his stumped fin, then over and over slowly revolved like a waning world; turned up the white secrets of his belly; lay like a log, and died. It was most piteous, that last expiring spout. As when by unseen hands the water is gradually drawn off from some mighty fountain, and with half-stifled melancholy gurglings the spray-column lowers and lowers to the ground—so the last long dying spout of the whale.&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption"><cite>Page 338–339</cite></div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Let us, then, look at this matter, along with some interesting items contingent. Every one knows that by the peculiar cunning of their gills, the finny tribes in general breathe the air which at all times is combined with the element in which they swim; hence, a herring or a cod might live a century, and never once raise its head above the surface. But owing to his marked internal structure which gives him regular lungs, like a human being&rsquo;s, the whale can only live by inhaling the disengaged air in the open atmosphere. Wherefore the necessity for his periodical visits to the upper world. But he cannot in any degree breathe through his mouth, for, in his ordinary attitude, the Sperm Whale&rsquo;s mouth is buried at least eight feet beneath the surface; and what is still more, his windpipe has no connexion with his mouth.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption"><cite>Page 348–349</cite></div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;And how nobly it raises our conceit of the mighty, misty monster, to behold him solemnly sailing through a calm tropical sea; his vast, mild head overhung by a canopy of vapour, engendered by his incommunicable contemplations, and that vapour—as you will sometimes see it—glorified by a rainbow, as if Heaven itself had put its seal upon his thoughts. For, d&rsquo;ye see, rainbows do not visit the clear air; they only irradiate vapour. And so, through all the thick mists of the dim doubts in my mind, divine intuitions now and then shoot, enkindling my fog with a heavenly ray. And for this I thank God; for all have doubts; many deny; but doubts or denials, few along with them, have intuitions. Doubts of all things earthly, and intuitions of some things heavenly; this combination makes neither believer nor infidel, but makes a man who regards them both with equal eye.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption"><cite>Page 352–353</cite></div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;As they narrated to each other their unholy adventures, their tales of terror told in words of mirth; as their uncivilized laughter forked upwards out of them, like the flames from the furnace; as to and fro, in their front, the harpooneers wildly gesticulated with their huge pronged forks and dippers; as the wind howled on, and the sea leaped, and the ship groaned and dived, and yet steadfastly shot her red hell further and further into the blackness of the sea and the night, and scornfully champed the white bone in her mouth, and viciously spat round her on all sides; then the rushing Pequod, freighted with savages, and laden with fire, and burning a corpse, and plunging into that blackness of darkness, seemed the material counterpart of her monomaniac commander&rsquo;s soul.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption"><cite>Page 397–398</cite></div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;But as the last whelmings intermixingly poured themselves over the sunken head of the Indian at the mainmast, leaving a few inches of the erect spar yet visible, together with long streaming yards of the flag, which calmly undulated, with ironical coincidings, over the destroying billows they almost touched;—at that instant, a red arm and a hammer hovered backwardly uplifted in the open air, in the act of nailing the flag faster and yet faster to the subsiding spar. A sky-hawk that tauntingly had followed the main-truck downwards from its natural home among the stars, pecking at the flag, and incommoding Tashtego there; this bird now chanced to intercept its broad fluttering wing between the hammer and the wood; and simultaneously feeling that etherial thrill, the submerged savage beneath, in his death-gasp, kept his hammer frozen there; and so the bird of heaven, with archangelic shrieks, and his imperial beak thrust upwards, and his whole captive form folded in the flag of Ahab, went down with his ship, which, like Satan, would not sink to hell till she had dragged a living part of heaven along with her, and helmeted herself with it.</p>
<p>&ldquo;Now small fowls flew screaming over the yet yawning gulf; a “sullen white surf beat against its steep sides; then all collapsed, and the great shroud of the sea rolled on as it rolled five thousand years ago.&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption"><cite>Page 529</cite></div></div><p>Here Melville makes the apologists argument that whales aren&rsquo;t going extinct, but rather, that they are just going somewhere else, where we can&rsquo;t see them anymore.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Nor, considered aright, does it seem any argument in favour of the gradual extinction of the Sperm Whale, for example, that in former years (the latter part of the last century, say) these Leviathans, in small pods, were encountered much oftener than at present, and, in consequence, the voyages were not so prolonged, and were also much more remunerative. Because, as has been elsewhere noticed, those whales, influenced by some views to safety, now swim the seas in immense caravans, so that to a large degree the scattered solitaries, yokes, and pods, and schools of other days are now aggregated into vast but widely separated, unfrequent armies. That is all. And equally fallacious seems the conceit, that because the so-called whale-bone whales no longer haunt many grounds in former years abounding with them, hence that species also is declining. For they are only being driven from promontory to cape; and if one coast is no longer enlivened with their jets, then, be sure, some other and remoter strand has been very recently startled by the unfamiliar spectacle.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption"><cite>431–432</cite></div></div><p>The scene on pages 451–453, where Ahab barters and japes with Perth the blacksmith to have him forge the steel pike that will affix Moby Dick once and for all is long, but wonderfully written. It starts with Ahab telling a riddle and ends by tempering the barbed monstrosity in blood.</p>
<p>Or there&rsquo;s this homage to the craftsman (as opposed to the tinkerer, the cobbler, the <em>hacker</em>),</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;I don&rsquo;t like this cobbling sort of business—I don&rsquo;t like it at all; it&rsquo;s undignified; it&rsquo;s not my place. Let tinkers&rsquo; brats do tinkerings; we are their betters. I like to take in hand none but clean, virgin, fair-and-square mathematical jobs, something that regularly begins at the beginning, and is at the middle when midway, and comes to an end at the conclusion; not a cobbler&rsquo;s job, that&rsquo;s at an end in the middle, and at the beginning at the end.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption"><cite>484–485</cite></div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Slowly crossing the deck from the scuttle, Ahab leaned over the side and watched how his shadow in the water sank and sank to his gaze, the more and the more that he strove to pierce the profundity. But the lovely aromas in that enchanted air did at last seem to dispel, for a moment, the cankerous thing in his soul. That glad, happy air, that winsome sky, did at last stroke and caress him; the step-mother world, so long cruel—forbidding—now threw affectionate arms round his stubborn neck, and did seem to joyously sob over him, as if over one, that however wilful and erring, she could yet find it in her heart to save and to bless. From beneath his slouched hat Ahab dropped a tear into the sea; nor did all the Pacific contain such wealth as that one wee drop.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption"><cite>Page 498–499</cite></div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;What is it, what nameless, inscrutable, unearthly thing is it; what cozening, hidden lord and master, and cruel, remorseless emperor commands me; that against all natural lovings and longings, I so keep pushing, and crowding, and jamming myself on all the time; recklessly making me ready to do what in my own proper, natural heart, I durst not so much as dare? Is Ahab, Ahab? Is it I, God, or who, that lifts this arm? But if the great sun move not of himself; but is as an errand-boy in heaven; nor one single star can revolve, but by some invisible power; how then can this one small heart beat; this one small brain think thoughts; unless God does that beating, does that thinking, does that living, and not I. By heaven, man, we are turned round and round in this world, like yonder windlass, and Fate is the handspike. And all the time, lo! that smiling sky, and this unsounded sea! Look! see yon Albicore! who put it into him to chase and fang that flying-fish? Where do murderers go, man! Who&rsquo;s to doom, when the judge himself is dragged to the bar?&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption"><cite>Page 500–501</cite></div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;But suddenly as he peered down and down into its depths, he profoundly saw a white living spot no bigger than a white weasel, with wonderful celerity uprising, and magnifying as it rose, till it turned, and then there were plainly revealed two long crooked rows of white, glistening teeth, floating up from the undiscoverable bottom. It was Moby Dick&rsquo;s open mouth and scrolled jaw; his vast, shadowed bulk still half blending with the blue of the sea. The glittering mouth yawned beneath the boat like an open-doored marble tomb […]&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption"><cite>Page 505</cite></div></div><p>And, again, Ahab describes his powerlessness before Fate, this time to Stubb,</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Starbuck, of late I&rsquo;ve felt strangely moved to thee; ever since that hour we both saw—thou know&rsquo;st what, in one another&rsquo;s eyes. But in this matter of the whale, be the front of thy face to me as the palm of this hand—a lipless, unfeatured blank. Ahab is for ever Ahab, man. This whole act&rsquo;s immutably decreed. &lsquo;Twas rehearsed by thee and me a billion years before this ocean rolled. Fool! I am the Fates&rsquo; lieutenant; I act under orders. Look thou, underling! that thou obeyest mine.—Stand round me, men. Ye see an old man cut down to the stump; leaning on a shivered lance; propped up on a lonely foot. &lsquo;Tis Ahab—his body&rsquo;s part; but Ahab&rsquo;s soul&rsquo;s a centipede, that moves upon a hundred legs. I feel strained, half stranded, as ropes that tow dismasted frigates in a gale; and I may look so. But ere I break, yell hear me crack; and till ye hear THAT, know that Ahab&rsquo;s hawser tows his purpose yet.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption"><cite>517–518</cite></div></div><p>And, finally, the money quote.</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Towards thee I roll, thou all-destroying but unconquering whale; to the last I grapple with thee; <strong>from hell&rsquo;s heart I stab at thee; for hate&rsquo;s sake I spit my last breath at thee.</strong> Sink all coffins and all hearses to one common pool! and since neither can be mine, let me then tow to pieces, while still chasing thee, though tied to thee, thou damned whale! THUS, I give up the spear!&rdquo;</div></blockquote><h2>Errata</h2><p>When I read books that I downloaded from <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org">Gutenberg Project</a>, I like to be helpful and provide corrections where I can. They have a very friendly and responsive errata-submission system.</p>
<pre class=" ">Title: Moby Dick; or, The Whale, by Herman Melville
      May 9, 2008 [EBook #2701]
File:  pg2701.epub

Page 182-183:
 right-mindedness in Starbuck, the invunerable jollity of indifference
   Add an “l” to “invunerable”; the invu[l]nerable jollity of</pre>      </div>
      </div>
        <div class="footer">
    <div class="footer-data"><div class="footer-links"><ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/contact.php" title="">Contact</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/support.php" title="">Support</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/privacy.php" title="">Privacy</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/rights.php" title="">Rights</a></li></ul></div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="copyright">Copyright (c) 1999-2026 earthli.com. All Rights Reserved.</div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="versions">Powered by <ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore/app_news.php">earthli News 3.7</a></li><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore" title="">earthli WebCore&trade; 3.7</a></li></ul></div></div>    </div>
      </div>
  </div>  </body>
</html>
]]>
  </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
      <title type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[Crime and Punishment by Fyodor Dostoyevsky (Read in 2014)]]>
  </title>
    <id>https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3076</id>
    <link href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3076"/>
    <updated>2015-03-29T19:23:21+02:00</updated>
    <author>
        <name type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[Marco von Ballmoos]]>
  </name>
      <uri>https://earthli.com/users/marco</uri>
    </author>
      <summary type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<blockquote class="quote abstract "><div>Disclaimer: these are notes I took while reading this book. They include citations I found interesting or enlightening or particularly well-written. In some cases, I&rsquo;ve pointed out which of these applies to which citation; in others, I have not. Any benefit you gain from reading these notes is... [<a class="complete-text-link" href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3076">More</a>]</div></blockquote>]]>
  </summary>
      <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<html lang="en">
  <head>
    <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/themes/ice.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/fonts/raleway.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/core/medium.css">
  </head>
  <body>
<div class="style-controls">  <div class="page">
    <div class="page-body">
<div class="info-box-top">
<p>
Published by <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_user.php?name=marco" title="Marco von Ballmoos" class="visible">marco</a> on <span class="date-time">29. Mar 2015 19:23:21 (GMT-5)</span>
</p>
</div>
      <div class="text-flow wide">
  <blockquote class="quote abstract "><div>Disclaimer: these are notes I took while reading this book. They include citations I found interesting or enlightening or particularly well-written. In some cases, I&rsquo;ve pointed out which of these applies to which citation; in others, I have not. Any benefit you gain from reading these notes is purely incidental to the purpose they serve of reminding me what I once read. Please see Wikipedia for a summary if I&rsquo;ve failed to provide one sufficient for your purposes. If my notes serve to trigger an interest in this book, then I&rsquo;m happy for you.</div></blockquote><h2>Citations</h2><p>Sonia is the daughter of Marmeladov, a drunkard and civil servant who can&rsquo;t keep his job and turns a blind eye when his entire household is supported by his eldest daughter&rsquo;s prostitution. He even manages to find a way to be at peace with taking money from her for his drink.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Hurrah for Sonia! What a mine they&rsquo;ve dug there! And they&rsquo;re making the most of it! Ye, they are making the most of it! They&rsquo;ve wept over it and grown used to it. Man grows used to everything, the scoundrel!&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption"><cite>Page 26</cite></div></div><p>Dostoyevsky&rsquo;s descriptions of despair and suffering and entrapment-by-life are unparalleled. The situations he posits seem unreal though they were likely all too real for all too many. The past tense is inappropriate here, for even in the modern day, in the most modern of countries, the cruelty of Dostoyevsky&rsquo;s reality is played out day after sorrowful, miserable day with no hope or end in sight, other than through the sweet, sweet release of death.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;It shall not be? But what are you going to do to prevent it? You&rsquo;ll forbid it? And what right have you? What can you promise them on your side to give you such a right? Your whole life, your whole future, you will devote to them <em>when you have finished your studies and obtained a post?</em> Yes, we have heard all that before, and that&rsquo;s all <em>words</em>, but now? And what are you doing now? You are living upon them. They borrow on their hundred roubles pension. They borrow from the Svidrigaïlovs. How are you going to save them from Svidrigaïlovs, from Afanasy Ivanovitch Vahrushin, oh, future millionaire Zeus who would arrange their lives for them? In another ten years? In another ten years, mother will be blind with knitting shawls, maybbe with weeping too. She will be worn to a shadow with fasting […]&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption"><cite>Page 43</cite></div></div><p>This next scene is noteworthy because of the depths of human depravity it shows, the utter disregard for another creature&rsquo;s suffering. A similar scene with an old, old whale in Moby Dick would remind me of this one. Presumably, the scene is a metaphor for the way in which the less fortunate are misused and mistreated and <em>depleted</em> by those above them, even if only a very little bit above them. Even if they themselves aren&rsquo;t all so fortunate, all the more reason to dump on those less capable of defending themselves, all the more reason to make others suffer as they themselves are made to suffer by those above them. Or maybe it&rsquo;s a cautionary tale of dunkenness; hard to tell.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;Near the entrance of the tavern stood a cart, but a strange cart. It was one of those big carts usually drawn by heavy cart-horses and laden with casks or other heavy goods.</p>
<p>&ldquo;[…]</p>
<p>&ldquo;But now, strange to say, in the shafts of such a cart he saw a thin little sorrel beast, on of those peasants&rsquo; nags which had often seen straining their utmost under a heavy load of wood or hay, especially when the wheels were stuck in the mud or in a rut. And the peasants would beat them so cruelly, sometimes even about the nose and eyes […] All of a sudden there was a great uproar of shouting, singing and the balalaika, and from the tavern a number of big and very drunken peasants came out, [¨…]</p>
<p>&ldquo;&ldquo;Get in, get in!&rdquo; shouted one of them, a young thick-necked peasant with a fleshy face red as a carrot. &ldquo;I&rsquo;ll take you all, get in!&rdquo;</p>
<p>&ldquo;&ldquo;Take us all with a beast like that!&rdquo;</p>
<p>&ldquo;&ldquo;Why, Mikolka, are you crazy to put a nag like that in such a cart?&rdquo;</p>
<p>&ldquo;&ldquo;And this mare is twenty if she is a day, mates!&rdquo;</p>
<p>&ldquo;<br>
Get in. I&rsquo;ll take you all,&ldquo; Mikolka shouted again, leaping first into the cart, seizing the reins and standing straight up in front. &ldquo;The bay has bone with Marvey,&rdquo; he shouted fom the car—&rdquo;and this brute, mates is just breaking my heart. I feels as if I could kill her. She&rsquo;s just eating her head off. Get in, I tell you! I&rsquo;ll make her gallop! She&rsquo;ll gallop!&rdquo; and he picked up the whip, perparing himself with relish to flogthe little mare.</p>
<p>&ldquo;[…]</p>
<p>&ldquo;They all clambered into Mikolk&rsquo;s cart, laughing and making jokes. Six men got in and there was still room for more. They hauled in a fat, rosy-cheeked woman. […] Two young fellows in the cart were just getting whips ready to help Mikolka.  with the cry of &ldquo;now,&rdquo; the mare tugged with all her might, but far from galloping, could scarcely move forward; she struggled with her legs, gasping and shinking from the blows of the three whips which were showered upon her like hail. […] Mikolka flew into a rage and furiously thrashed the mare, as though he supposed she really could gallop.&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption"><cite>Page 52–53</cite></div></div><p>When members of the crowd expressed dismay and offered condemnation, Mikolka responded, </p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;Don&rsquo;t meddle! It&rsquo;s my property, I&rsquo;ll do what I choose. Get in, more of you! Get in, all of you! I will have her go at a gallop!</p>
<p>&ldquo;All at once laughter broke into a roar and covered everything: the mare, roused by the shower of blows, began feebly kicking. Even the old man [who&rsquo;d initially voiced concern] could not help smiling. To think of a wretched little beast like that trying to kick!</p>
<p>&ldquo;Two lads in the crowd snatched up whips and ran to the mare to beat her about the ribs. […]</p>
<p>&ldquo;&ldquo;Hit her in the face, in the eyes, in the eyes,&rdquo; cried Mikolka.</p>
<p>&ldquo;[…The mare] was almost at last gasp, but began kicking once more.</p>
<p>&ldquo;&ldquo;I&rsquo;ll teach you to kick,&rdquo; Mikolka shouted ferociously. He threw down the whip, bent forward and picked up from the bottom of the cart a long, thick shaft, he took hold of one end with both hands and with an effort brandished it over the mare.</p>
<p>&ldquo;&ldquo;He&rsquo;ll crush her,&rdquo; was shouted round him. &ldquo;He&rsquo;ll kill her!&rdquo;</p>
<p>&ldquo;&ldquo;It&rsquo;s my property,&rdquo; shouted Mikolka and brought the shaft down with a swinging blow. There was a sound of a heavy thud.</p>
<p>&ldquo;&ldquo;Thrash her, thrash her! Why have you stopped?&rdquo; shouted voices in the crowd.</p>
<p>&ldquo;And Mikolka swung the shaft a second time and it fell a second time on the spine of the luckless mare. She sank back on her haunches, but lurched forward and tugged forward with all her force, tugged first on one side and then on the other, trying to move the cart. But the six whips were attacking her in all directions, and the shaft was raised again and fell up her a third time, then a fourth, with heavy measured blows. Mikolka was in a fury that he could not kill her at one blow.</p>
<p>&ldquo;&ldquo;She&rsquo;s a tough one,&rdquo; was shouted in the crowd.</p>
<p>&ldquo;[…]</p>
<p>&ldquo;&ldquo;Fetch an axe to her! Finish her off,&rdquo; shouted a third.</p>
<p>&ldquo;&ldquo;i&rsquo;ll show you! Stand off,&rdquo; Mikolka screamed frantically; he threw down the shaft, stooped down in the car and picked up an iron crowbar. &ldquo;Look out,&rdquo; he shouted, and with all his might he dealt a stunning blow at the poor mare. The blow fell; the mare staggered, sank back, tried to pull, but the bar fell again with a swinging blow on her back and shell on the ground like a log.</p>
<p>&ldquo;&ldquo;Finish her off,&rdquo; shouted Mikolka and he leapt beside himself, out of the cart. Several young men, also flushed with drink, seized anything they could come across—whips, sticks, poles, and ran to the dying mare. Mikolka stood on one side and began dealing random blows with the crowbar. The mare stretched out her head, drew a long breath and died.</p>
<p>&ldquo;&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption"><cite>Page 54</cite></div></div><p>At this point, it&rsquo;s seeming more and more like Dostoyevsky is comparing the horse to serfs, which until very recently had been the property and chattel of the nobility. Still a sore topic, clearly.</p>
<p>This next quote interests me only in that it further cements the terrible reputation that the German language has among almost all writers of note.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;as soon as you came in, I saw how you could help me; to begin with, I am weak in spelling and secondly, I am sometimes utterly adrift in German, so that I make it up as I go along for the most part. The only comfort is, that it&rsquo;s bound to be a change for the better. Though who can tell, maybe it&rsquo;s sometimes for the worse. […]&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption"><cite>99-100</cite></div></div><p>And this is a condemnation of &ldquo;science&rdquo; but likely insofar as it is manipulated by capitalism.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;science now tells us, love yourself before all men, for everything in the world rests on self-interest. You love yourself and manage your own affairs properly and your coat remains whole. Economic truth adds that the better private affairs are organised in society—the more whole coats, so to say—the firmer are its foundations and the better is the common welfare organised too. Therefore, in acquiring wealth solely and exclusively for myself, I am scquiring, so to speak, for all, and helping to bring to pass my neighbour&rsquo;s getting a little more than a torn coat; and that not from private, personal liberality, but as a consequence of the gernal advance. The ida is simple, but unhappily it has been a long time reaching us, being hindered by idealism and sentimentality. And yet it would seem to want very little wit to perceive it…&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption"><cite>130–131</cite></div></div><p>The false palliatives of religion are next on the chopping block, with its advice that is so at odds with the common logic of life, especially and exactly those lives that suffer the most, that have the least to thank a supposedly benevolent but also mysterious and uncaring God for.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;God is merciful; look to the Most High for succour,&ldquo; the priest began.</p>
<p>&ldquo;&ldquo;Ach! He is merciful, but not to us.&rdquo;</p>
<p>&ldquo;&ldquo;That&rsquo;s a sin, a sin, madam,&rdquo; observed the priest, shaking his head.</p>
<p>&ldquo;&ldquo;And isn&rsquo;t that sin?&rdquo; cried Katerina ivanovna, pointing to the dying man.</p>
<p>&ldquo;&ldquo;Perhaps those who have involuntarily caused the accident will agree to compensate you, at least for the losse of his earnings.&rdquo;</p>
<p>&ldquo;&ldquo;You don&rsquo;t understand!&rdquo; cried Katerina Ivanovna angrily waving her hand. &ldquo;And why should they compensate me? Why, he was drunk and threw himself under the horses! What earnings? He brought us in nothing but misery. He drink everything away, the drunkard! He robbed us to get drink, he wasted their lives and mine for drink! And thank God he&rsquo;s dying! One less to keep!</p>
<p>&ldquo;&ldquo;You must forgive in the hour of death, that&rsquo;s a sin, madam, such feelings are a great sin.&rdquo;&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption"><cite>159-160</cite></div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;here you have the end of the world, an anchorage, a quiet haven, the navel of the earth, the three fishes that are the foundation of the world, the essence of pancakes, of savoury fish-pies, of the evening samovar, of soft sighs and warm shawls, and hot stoves to sleep on—as snug as though you were dead, and yet you&rsquo;re alive—the advantages of both at once!&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption"><cite>178</cite></div></div><p>The theory of the sacrificing one for the benefit of the privileged, the &ldquo;special&rdquo;.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;I maintain that if the discoveries of Kepler and Newton could not have been made known except by sacrificing the lives of one, a dozen, a hundred, or more men, Newton would have had the right, would indeed have been duty bound… to <em>eliminate</em> the dozen or the hundred men for the sake of making his discoveries known to the whole of humanity. But it does not follow from that that Newton had a right to murder poeple right and left and to steal every day in the market. then, I remember, I maintain in my article that all… well, legislators and leaders of men, such as Lycurgus, Solon, Mahomet, Napoleon, and so on, were all without exception criminals, from the very fact that, making a new law, they transgressed the ancient one, handed down from their ancestors and held sacred by the people, and they ddi not stop short at bloodshed either, if that bloodshed—often of innocent persons fighting vravely in defence of ancient law—were of use to their cause. It&rsquo;s remarkable, in fact, that the majority, indeed, of these benefactors and leaders of humanity were guilty of terrible carnage. In short, I maintain that all great men or even men a little out of the common, that is to say capable of giving some new word, must from their very nature be criminals—more or less, of course. Otherwise, it&rsquo;s hard for them to get out of the common rut.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption"><cite>Page 218–219</cite></div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The first category, generally speaking, are men conservative in temperament and law-abiding; they live under control and love to be controlled. to my thinking it is their duty to be controlled, because that&rsquo;s their vocation, and there is nothing humiliating in it for them. The second category all transgress the law; they are destoryers or disposed to destruction according to their capacities. The crimes of these men are of course relative and varied; for the most part they seek in very varied ways the destruction of the present for the sake of the better. But if such a one is forced for the sake of his idea to step over a corpse or wade through blood, he can, I maintain, find within himself, in his conscience, a sanction for wading through blood—that depends on the idea and its dimensions, not that.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption"><cite>Page 219</cite></div></div><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The vast mass of mankind is mere material, and only exists in order by some great effort, by some mysterious process, by means of some crossing of races and stocks, to bring into the world at last perhaps one man out of a thousand with a spark of independence. One in aten thousand perhaps—I speak roughly, approximately—is born with some independence, and with still greater independence one in a hundred thousand. The man of genius is one of millions, and the great geniuses, the crown of humanity, appear on earth perhaps one in many thousand millions.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;And you don&rsquo;t suppose that I went into it headlong like a fool? I went into it like a wise man, and that ws just my destruction. And you mustn&rsquo;t suppose that I didn&rsquo;t know, for instance, that if I began to question myself whether I had the right to gain power—I certainly hadn&rsquo;t the right—or that if I asked myself whether a human being is a louse it proved that it wasn&rsquo;t so for me, though it might be for a man who would go straight to his goal without asking questions. … If I worried myself all those days, wondering whether Napoleon would have done it or not, I felt clearly of course that I wasn&rsquo;t Napoleon. I had to endure all the agony of that battle of ideas, Sonia, and I longed to throw it off: I wanted to murder withou casuistry, to murder for my own sake, for myself alon!&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption"><cite>345</cite></div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Crime? What crime?&rdquo; he cried in sudden fury. &ldquo;That I killed a vile noxious insect, an old pawnbroker woman, of use to no one!… Killing her was atonement for forty sins. She was sucking the life out of poor peole. Was that crime? I am not hinking of it and I am no thinking of expiating it, and why are you all rubbing it in on all sides? &lsquo;A crime! a crime!&rsquo;&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption"><cite>Page 427–428</cite></div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Ah, it&rsquo;s not picturesque, not aesthetically attractive! I fail to understand why bombarding peole by regular siege is more honourable. The fear of appearances is the first symptom of impotence. I&rsquo;ve never, never recognised this more clearly than now, and I am further than ever from seeing that what I did was a crime. I&rsquo;ve never, never been stronger and more convinced than now.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption"><cite>Page 428–429</cite></div></div><h2>Errata</h2><p>When I read books that I downloaded from <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org">Gutenberg Project</a>, I like to be helpful and provide corrections where I can. They have a very friendly and responsive errata-submission system.</p>
<pre class=" ">Title: Crime and Punishment, by Fyodor Dostoyevsky

       Translated by Constance Garnett
       March 28, 2006 [EBook #2554]
File:  pg2554.epub

Page 94:
  And where did you go, my I ask?
    Change &ldquo;my&rdquo; to &ldquo;may&rdquo;; And where did you go, [may] I ask?

Page 100-100:
  with a girl, probably her daughter wearing a hat, and carrying a parasol.
    Add a comma after &ldquo;daughter&rdquo;; probably her daughter, wearing a hat

Page 174-175:
  Avdotya Romanovna was remarkably good looking
    Add a hyphen between &ldquo;good&rdquo; and &ldquo;looking&rdquo;; remarkably good-looking

Page 218:
  would indeed have been duty bound
    Add a hyphen between &ldquo;duty&rdquo; and &ldquo;bound&rdquo;; have been duty-bound

Page 251-252:
  our meeting was disregarded solely at my instance
    Replace &ldquo;instance&rdquo; with &ldquo;insistence&rdquo;; at my [insistence]

Page 258-259:
  Then he says is he going to be married and has already fixed on the girl
    Switch &ldquo;is&rdquo; and &ldquo;he&rdquo;; Then he says he is going to be married

Page 259-260:
  to borrow it from him and pay him six per cent
    Remove the space between &ldquo;per&rdquo; and &ldquo;cent&rdquo;; pay him six percent

Page 311:
  That&rsquo;s because you are of incapable of getting away from prejudices.
    Remove &ldquo;of&rdquo; before &ldquo;incapable&rdquo;; you are incapable of getting away

Page 415-416:
  It would be interesting to know who stay here?
    &ldquo;stay&rdquo; should be in the past tense; to know who stay[ed] here?</pre>      </div>
      </div>
        <div class="footer">
    <div class="footer-data"><div class="footer-links"><ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/contact.php" title="">Contact</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/support.php" title="">Support</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/privacy.php" title="">Privacy</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/rights.php" title="">Rights</a></li></ul></div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="copyright">Copyright (c) 1999-2026 earthli.com. All Rights Reserved.</div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="versions">Powered by <ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore/app_news.php">earthli News 3.7</a></li><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore" title="">earthli WebCore&trade; 3.7</a></li></ul></div></div>    </div>
      </div>
  </div>  </body>
</html>
]]>
  </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
      <title type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[The Idiot by Fyodor Dostoyevsky (Read in 2014)]]>
  </title>
    <id>https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=2991</id>
    <link href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=2991"/>
    <updated>2015-03-29T19:21:30+02:00</updated>
    <author>
        <name type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[Marco von Ballmoos]]>
  </name>
      <uri>https://earthli.com/users/marco</uri>
    </author>
      <summary type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<blockquote class="quote abstract "><div>Disclaimer: these are notes I took while reading this book. They include citations I found interesting or enlightening or particularly well-written. In some cases, I&rsquo;ve pointed out which of these applies to which citation; in others, I have not. Any benefit you gain from reading these notes is... [<a class="complete-text-link" href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=2991">More</a>]</div></blockquote>]]>
  </summary>
      <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<html lang="en">
  <head>
    <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/themes/ice.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/fonts/raleway.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/core/medium.css">
  </head>
  <body>
<div class="style-controls">  <div class="page">
    <div class="page-body">
<div class="info-box-top">
<p>
Published by <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_user.php?name=marco" title="Marco von Ballmoos" class="visible">marco</a> on <span class="date-time">29. Mar 2015 19:21:30 (GMT-5)</span>
</p>
<p>
Updated by <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_user.php?name=marco" title="Marco von Ballmoos" class="visible">marco</a> on <span class="date-time">7. Feb 2026 08:17:42 (GMT-5)</span>
</p>
</div>
      <div class="text-flow wide">
  <blockquote class="quote abstract "><div>Disclaimer: these are notes I took while reading this book. They include citations I found interesting or enlightening or particularly well-written. In some cases, I&rsquo;ve pointed out which of these applies to which citation; in others, I have not. Any benefit you gain from reading these notes is purely incidental to the purpose they serve of reminding me what I once read. Please see Wikipedia for a summary if I&rsquo;ve failed to provide one sufficient for your purposes. If my notes serve to trigger an interest in this book, then I&rsquo;m happy for you.</div></blockquote><h2>Notes</h2><p>The idiot is the tale of a Russian ex-patriate named Prince Lef Muishin who returns to Russia from having lived in Switzerland. He was sent to Switzerland in order to cure his chronis epilepsy, which rendered him stupefied and nearly speechless, for all intents and purposes an idiot.</p>
<p>He returns penniless but quickly ingratiates himself to a noble family, which agrees to take him in, if only for a while. The cast of characters surrounding him is wild and foolish and, as in so many other Russian novels, utterly and completely useless. There is almost no indication of where money comes from—it might as well just grow on trees. The others consider the prince an idiot, but he is evinces deeper philosophical thinking than the rest of them put together and is much more eloquent, to boot.</p>
<p>The plot is very bare, but consists of sketches, almost like theater pieces, that feels much more like the <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=2984">Brothers Karamazov</a> than his earlier work, <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3076">Crime and Punishment</a>.</p>
<p>Dostoyevsky doesn&rsquo;t waste many words on descriptions of places or people. Places have names, women are beautiful and men are distinguished, but not much else. Occasionally someone is said to have a mustache but that&rsquo;s about where the descriptiveness ends. As in Karamazov, the characters ricochet from joy to abject misery within seconds, always shouting and rejoicing as if there were only exaggerated emotions. People fall in love in minutes. It&rsquo;s kind of crazy, really, and sometimes hard to understand how something that reads so much like a Mexican telenovella script can be called some of the world&rsquo;s best literature. There is almost no metaphor or simile in Karamazov or The Idiot.</p>
<p>Crime and Punishment is different. Significantly so. Here the descriptions of the environment, the characters and the situations are visceral and wonderfully done. The misery is heartrending but at least it doesn&rsquo;t feel plastic and fake. There are descriptions on a par with the master of the form, Tolstoy or Twain, whose depictions of nature were absolutely lovely and similarly evoked emotion.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.earthli.com/data/news/attachments/entry/2991/2014-11-04-1074petty.png"><img src="https://www.earthli.com/data/news/attachments/entry/2991/2014-11-04-1074petty_tn.png" alt=" " class=" align-left"></a>As <a href="http://wondermark.com/1k74/">#1074; Le Roman à Crybaby</a> by <cite>David Malki</cite> (<cite><a href="http://wondermark.com/">Wondermark</a></cite>) put it,</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;These poor people, shoehorned by society into leading lives where they are unable to be anything but annoying.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p><span class="clear-both"></span></p>
<h2>Citations</h2><p>On the entitlement of nobility and idleness:</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The fact was, Totski was at that time a man of fifty years of age: his position was solid and respectable; his place in society had long been firmly fixed upon safe foundations; he loved himself, his personal comforts, and his position better than all the world, as every respectable gentleman should!&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption"><cite>Pages 35–36</cite></div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Let&rsquo;s all go to my boudoir,&ldquo; she dais, &ldquo;and they shall bring some coffee in there. That&rsquo;s the room where we all assemble and busy ourselves as we like best,&rdquo; she explained. &ldquo;Alexandra, my eldest, here plays the piano, or reads or sews; Adelaida paints landscapes and portraits (bu never finishes any); and Aglaya sits and does nothing. I don&rsquo;t work too much, either.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption"><cite>Page 45</cite></div></div><p>This kind of reminds me of Sansa&rsquo;s thoughts in the &ldquo;Storm of Swords&rdquo;, the Song of Ice and Fire series being also largely concerned with the lives of nobility.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;This woman, this human being, lived to a great age. She had children, a husband and family, friends and relations; her household was busy and cheerful; she was surrounded by smiling faces; and then suddenly they are gone, and she is left alone like a solitary fly… like a fly, cursed with the burden of her age. At last, God calls her to Himself. At sunset, on a lovely summer&rsquo;s evening, my little old woman passes away—a thought, you will notice, which offers much food for reflection—and behold! Instead of tears and prayers to start her on her last journey, she has insults and jeers from a young ensign, who stands before her, with his hands in his pockets, making a terrible row about a soup tureen!&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption"><cite>Page 124</cite></div></div><p>When the Prince is the only voice of moral reason in a conversation, he is chided by those supposedly holding the moral high ground, the non-noble revolutionists.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Prince, you are not only simple, but your simplicity is almost past the limit,&ldquo; said Lebedeff&rsquo;s nephew, with a sarcastic smile.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption"><cite>Page 227</cite></div></div><p>In a country of the blind, the one-eyed man is supposedly king, but it seems that the two-eyed man is an idiot.</p>
<p>In this next scene, a young man of the left has been offered financial recompense as remuneration for a perceived slight. His friend tells him the way of the world.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Accept, Antip,&rdquo; whispered the boxer eagerly, leaning past the back of Hippolyte&rsquo;s chair to give his friend this piece of advice. &ldquo;Take it for the present; we can see about more later on.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption"><cite>Page 227–228</cite></div></div><p>A brutal slash at the supposedly honorable left, who are just as grasping as those they seek to unseat, though they couch their actions in flowery paeans to the nobility of man. These are the kind of people who will never change anything fundamental. Their main problem with the status quo is not how the status quo works or how undignifying it is for everyone involved, but that they are not on top. Once they are on top, they will lean back and enjoy all of the spoils they once derided, when those selfsame spoils were being wrested from their hands rather than being pushed into them.</p>
<p>This next part reminded me a bit of a part of the Brothers Karamazov, where Dmitri also had stolen money and wasted half of it, sparing the other half up painstakingly because, once he&rsquo;d paid that half back, the crimes could still be forgiven, though money had been stolen and a lot of it spent. As long as half was nobly returned, it would be OK and the error could be forgiven.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Of course, there is a difference between a hundred roubles and two hundred and fifty, but in this case the principle is the main point, and that a hundred and fifty roubles are missing is only a side issue.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption"><cite>Page 236</cite></div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Why did you come here tonight so insolently? &lsquo;Give us our rights, but don&rsquo;t dare to speak in our presence. Show us every mark of deepest respect, while we treat you like the scum of the earth.&lsquo; The miscreants have written a tissue of calumny in their article, and these are the men who seek for truth, and do battle for the right! &lsquo;We do not beseech, we demand, you will get no thanks from us, because you will be acting to satisfy your own conscience!&rsquo; What morality!&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption"><cite>Page 238</cite></div></div><p>The classic plaint against &ldquo;the system&rdquo;—commonly capitalism, or the peculiarly single-minded variant we employ—in which it is pointed out to those benefiting that their comfort rests atop a heap of bones and suffering.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Not railways, properly speaking, presumptuous youth, but the general tendency of which railways may be considered as the outward expression and symbol. We hurry and push and hustle, for the good of humanity! &lsquo;The world is becoming too noisy, too commercial!&rsquo; groans some solitary thinker. &lsquo;Undoubtedly it is, but the noise of waggons bearing bread to starving humanity is of more value than tranquility of soul.&rsquo; replies another triumphantly, and passes on with an air of pride. As for me, I don&rsquo;t believe in these waggons brining bread to humanity. For, founded on no moral principle, these may well, even in the act of carrying bread to humanity, coldly exclude a considerable portion of humanity from enjoying it; that has been seen more than once.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption"><cite>Pages 316–317</cite></div></div><p>Hippolyte describes why suicide is not immoral, but a way of exerting control where there is otherwise none.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;And finally, nature has so limited my capacity for work or activity of any kind, in allotting me but three weeks of time, that suicide is about the only thing left that I can begin and end in the time of my own free will.</p>
<p>&ldquo;Perhaps then I am anxious to take advantage of my last chance of doing something for myself. A protest is sometimes no small thing.&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption"><cite>Page 352–353</cite></div></div><p>An old and eloquent formulation of &ldquo;ignorance is bliss&rdquo; and its complement, &ldquo;knowledge is suffering&rdquo;. I have a lovely cartoon that posits a corollary to the oft-misattributed maxim that &ldquo;those who do not know or remember history are doomed to repeat it&rdquo;. It reads &ldquo;Those who do know history are doomed to watch others repeat it.&rdquo;</p>
<p>I would paraphrase it as: &ldquo;Those who do know history are doomed to stand by powerless which the ignorant and more powerful go about the business of repeating it.&rdquo;</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;Of such people there are countless numbers in this world—far more even than appear. They can be divided into two classes as all men can—that is, those of limited intellect, and those who are much cleverer. The former of these classes is the happier.</p>
<p>&ldquo;to a commonplace man of limited intellect, for instance, nothing is simpler than to imagine himself an original character, and to revel in that belief without the slightest misgiving.</p>
<p>&ldquo;Many of our young women have thought fit to cut their hair short, pun on blue spectacles, and call themselves Nihilists. By doing this they have been able to persuade themselves, without further trouble, that they have acquired new convictions of their own. some men have but felt some little qualm of kindness towards their fellow-men, and the fact has been quite enough to persuade them that they stand alone in the van of enlightenment and that no-one has such humanitarian feelings as they. Others have but to read an idea of somebody else&rsquo;s, and they can immediately assimilate it and believe that it was a child of their own brain. The &ldquo;impudence of ignorance,&rdquo; if I may use the expression, is developed to a wonderful extent in such cases;—unlikely as it appears, it is met with at every turn.&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption"><cite>Page 391–392</cite></div></div><p>The hipster/poseur is an ancient character class, it seems. And, in the same breath, putting the lie to the youthful belief that they are inventing everything and that they are no only the first to suffer in the particular fasion in which they are suffering but also that the solution they come up with is unique in history. In all likelihood, it is not. One cannot spend ten minutes thinking about a thing and think to outstrip all of human history, ingenuity and knowledge. If you think you&rsquo;re being clever, you are most likely being clever in a restricted field, you have have found a local maximum that looks like a molehill from the heights achieved by others who have hoed that particular row for much, much longer. In the field of philosophy, that row was hoed millenia before you were even born.</p>
<p>Do not let this prevent you from enjoying your feeling of genius. That you came up with the thought on your own is encouraging and merits further effort. You have, however, only contributed to your own personal growth and not yet added a stone to the cairn of human knowledge.</p>
<p><span class="clear-both"></span></p>
<h2>Errata</h2><p>When I read books that I downloaded from <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org">Gutenberg Project</a>, I like to be helpful and provide corrections where I can. They have a very friendly and responsive errata-submission system.</p>
<pre class=" ">Page 282:
  There I we don&rsquo;t often get that sort of letter; and yet
    Remove &ldquo;There I&rdquo; before &ldquo;we&rdquo;

Page 289:
  The fact was that in the crowd, not far from where lie was sitting
    Change &ldquo;lie&rdquo; to &ldquo;he&rdquo;; not far from where [he] was sitting

Page 293:
  &ldquo;What I don&rsquo;t you know about it yet? He doesn&rsquo;t know—imagine that!&rdquo;
    Remove the &ldquo;I&rdquo;

Page 297-298:
  &ldquo;he was only aware that she was sitting by, him and talking to him, and&rdquo;
    Remove the comma after &ldquo;by&rdquo;; that she was sitting by him and talking

Page 337:
  The man&rsquo;s face seemed tome to be refined and even pleasant.
    Change &ldquo;tome&rdquo; to &ldquo;to&rdquo; and &ldquo;me&rdquo;; The man&rsquo;s face seemed to me to be

Page 403:
  &ldquo;He&rsquo;s a little screw,&rdquo; cried the general: &ldquo;he drills holes my heart […]&rdquo;
    Add &ldquo;in&rdquo; after &ldquo;holes&rdquo;; he drills holes [in] my heart

Page 411–412:
  He would take up a hook from the table and open it
    Change &ldquo;hook&rdquo; to &ldquo;book&rdquo;; He would take up a [book] from the table

Page 433:
  bought with his money, instead of Schiosser&rsquo;s History.
    Change &ldquo;Schiosser&rsquo;s&rdquo; to &ldquo;Schlosser&rsquo;s&rdquo;

Page 464:
  We must let out Christ shine forth upon the Western nations,
    Change &ldquo;out&rdquo; to &ldquo;our&rdquo;; We must let [our] Christ shine

Page 467:
  it seemed to  be uncertain whether or no to topple over on to the head
    Change &ldquo;no&rdquo; to &ldquo;not&rdquo;; whether or no[t] to topple over

Page 510:
  he whipped up the horses, and they were oft.
    Change &ldquo;oft&rdquo; to &ldquo;off&rdquo;; and they were [off].

Page 527:
  infatuations and adventures, that they did hot care to talk of them,
    Change &ldquo;hot&rdquo; to &ldquo;not&rdquo;; that they did [not] care to talk of them,</pre>      </div>
      </div>
        <div class="footer">
    <div class="footer-data"><div class="footer-links"><ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/contact.php" title="">Contact</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/support.php" title="">Support</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/privacy.php" title="">Privacy</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/rights.php" title="">Rights</a></li></ul></div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="copyright">Copyright (c) 1999-2026 earthli.com. All Rights Reserved.</div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="versions">Powered by <ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore/app_news.php">earthli News 3.7</a></li><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore" title="">earthli WebCore&trade; 3.7</a></li></ul></div></div>    </div>
      </div>
  </div>  </body>
</html>
]]>
  </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
      <title type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[The Brothers Karamazov by Fyodor Dostoyevsky (1880) (Read in 2014)]]>
  </title>
    <id>https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=2984</id>
    <link href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=2984"/>
    <updated>2015-03-29T18:30:57+02:00</updated>
    <author>
        <name type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[Marco von Ballmoos]]>
  </name>
      <uri>https://earthli.com/users/marco</uri>
    </author>
      <summary type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<blockquote class="quote abstract "><div>Disclaimer: these are notes I took while reading this book. They include citations I found interesting or enlightening or particularly well-written. In some cases, I&rsquo;ve pointed out which of these applies to which citation; in others, I have not. Any benefit you gain from reading these notes is... [<a class="complete-text-link" href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=2984">More</a>]</div></blockquote>]]>
  </summary>
      <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<html lang="en">
  <head>
    <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/themes/ice.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/fonts/raleway.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/core/medium.css">
  </head>
  <body>
<div class="style-controls">  <div class="page">
    <div class="page-body">
<div class="info-box-top">
<p>
Published by <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_user.php?name=marco" title="Marco von Ballmoos" class="visible">marco</a> on <span class="date-time">29. Mar 2015 18:30:57 (GMT-5)</span>
</p>
<p>
Updated by <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_user.php?name=marco" title="Marco von Ballmoos" class="visible">marco</a> on <span class="date-time">22. Jan 2021 23:48:00 (GMT-5)</span>
</p>
</div>
      <div class="text-flow wide">
  <blockquote class="quote abstract "><div>Disclaimer: these are notes I took while reading this book. They include citations I found interesting or enlightening or particularly well-written. In some cases, I&rsquo;ve pointed out which of these applies to which citation; in others, I have not. Any benefit you gain from reading these notes is purely incidental to the purpose they serve of reminding me what I once read. Please see Wikipedia for a summary if I&rsquo;ve failed to provide one sufficient for your purposes. If my notes serve to trigger an interest in this book, then I&rsquo;m happy for you.</div></blockquote><p>Like Tolstoy&rsquo;s novels, this was published as a serial in a magazine of the time called <em>The Messenger</em>. There isn&rsquo;t an encompassing story arc, so it&rsquo;s hard to call it a novel as such. It felt more like a collection of short stories and novellas that included the same cast of characters.</p>
<p>The first part is a long introduction to the debauched family of the Karamazovs and the other locals who they&rsquo;ve drawn into their tawdry orbit. At the center of the first act is the patriarch Fyodor, who argumentatively fences with his three sons, Ivan, Dmitri (Mitya) and Alexander (Alyosha). There is a fourth (possible) son in the person of Smerdyakov.</p>
<p>A subsequent longer section is a long sermon by Ivan, as told to Alyosha. This was the most interesting part of the book thus far.</p>
<p>The life story of Father Zossima follows. This is the spiritual father of Alyosha, who is pledging to be a monk and values this elder above all others.</p>
<p>Kolya is a young narrator in book 5 (?) who is remarkably full of himself, as clever young man of that age typically are.</p>
<p>his narrative voice is also a prime example of what I consider to be the main problem with reading 19th-century Russian literature that is heralded the world over as top-one-hundred if not top-ten of all time.</p>
<p>With modern literature—that is, written during my time or near to it, say mid-20th century and onward—I can usually determine the intended tone of the writing. Is the author espousing his own views through a character? Or is the author espousing views he does not support through that character? If a character is ludicrous and pompous and just out-and-out wrong-headed, I can laugh along, knowing that the author intended to parody opposing worldviews.</p>
<p>However, with Dostoyevsky (and, to a lesser degree, with Tolstoy), while I know what I think of the characters and their views, I am often unsure of what the author intended. I feel like the guy who laughs out loud at a sad movie because he doesn&rsquo;t realize that the director was being dead-serious.</p>
<p>This doesn&rsquo;t interfere with my enjoyment of the writing—such as it is—but it certainly makes it more difficult to slog through long conversations between what I consider to be fools discussing utter foolishness when I don&rsquo;t know whether the author is in on the joke. In net effect, I feel that I can read more of the exact same writing when I know it&rsquo;s a parody than when I feel that the author intended to convey what he or she considers to be deep truths. </p>
<p>It may reflect poorly on me, I suppose.</p>
<p>Perhaps something is lost in translation or there is too great a distance between the culture that created the literature. I feel that my enjoyment of this type of great literature is too superficial. I see sparks where I feel that I am in on the joke, where I appreciate a bit of cleverness that or phrase, but I am saddled with doubt that I am enjoying the right thing.</p>
<p>On the other hand, I don&rsquo;t want to be told by experts how I&rsquo;m supposed to enjoy the book. I would like to be able to enjoy the ins and outs without help but, short of becoming an fluent reader of Russian and possibly more of an expert on a culture and mindset that lies over a century in the past, this will not be possible. That is, I can enjoy other good works on a much deeper level that I can these great works of art. That&rsquo;s OK, though. I just wish that people would hedge their recommendation that &ldquo;everyone should read these&rdquo; to acknowledge that the level of enjoyment, satisfaction and understanding will vary greatly. While this is always the case, it is all the more likely when the original language and culture of the author of the work stands in such stark contrast to that of the reader.</p>
<p>The trial. The trial. It was a farce, with either Dostoyevsky or his translator Constance Gardner constantly using the word &ldquo;evidence&rdquo; when &ldquo;hearsay&rdquo; would have been much much more accurate.</p>
<h2>Citations</h2><p>I like this bit of drunken logic,</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The monks in the monastery probably believe that there&rsquo;s a ceiling in hell, for instance. Now I&rsquo;m ready to believe in hell, but without a ceiling. It make it more refined, more Lutheran that is. And, after all, what does it matter whether it has a ceiling or hasn&rsquo;t? But, do you know, there&rsquo;s a damnable question involved in it? If there&rsquo;s no ceiling there can be no hooks, and if there are no hooks it all breaks down, which is unlikely again, for then there would be none to drag me down to hell, and if they don&rsquo;t drag me down what justice is there in the world? <em>If faudrait les inventer</em>, those hooks, on purpose for me alone, for, if you only knew, Alyosha, what a blackguard I am.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption"><cite>Page 23-24</cite></div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;I have a longing for life, and I go on living in spite of logic. Though I may not believe in the order of the universe, yet I love the sticky little leaves as they open in spring. I love the blue sky, I love some people whom one loves you know sometimes without knowing why. I love some great deeds done by men, though I&rsquo;ve long ceased perhaps to have faith in them, yet from old habit one&rsquo;s heart prizes them. Here they have brought the soup for you, eat it, it will do you good. It&rsquo;s first-rate soup, they know how to make it here. I want to travel in Europe, Alyosha, I shall set off from here. And yet I know that I am only going to a graveyard, but it&rsquo;s a most precious graveyard, that&rsquo;s what it is! Precious are the dead that life there, every stone over them speaks of such burning life in the past, of such passionate faith in their work, their truth, their struggle and their science, that I know I shall fall on the ground and kiss those stones and weep over them: though I&rsquo;m convinced in my heart that it&rsquo;s long been nothing but a graveyard. And I shall not weep from despair, but simply because I shall be happy in my tears, I shall steep my soul in my emotion. I love the sticky leaves in spring, the blue sky—that&rsquo;s all it is. It&rsquo;s not a matter of intellect or logic, it&rsquo;s loving with one&rsquo;s inside, with one&rsquo;s stomach. One loves the first strength of one&rsquo;s youth. Do you understand anything of my tirade, Alyosha?&rdquo; Ivan laughed suddenly.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption"><cite>Page 225–226</cite></div></div><p>Quoting Patton Oswalt: <span class="quote-inline">&ldquo;I&rsquo;m glad you like a book.&rdquo;</span></p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Fathers and teachers, forgive me and don&rsquo;t be angry, that like a little child I&rsquo;ve been babbling of what you knew long ago, and can teach me a hundred times more skillfully. I only speak from rapture and forgive my tears, for I love the Bible.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption"><cite>Page 289–290</cite></div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The jealous man can forgive extraordinarily quickly (though, of course, after a violent scene), and he is able to forgive infidelity almost conclusively proved, the very kisses and embraces he has seen, if only he can somehow be convinced that is has all been &ldquo;for the last time,&rdquo; and that his rival will vanish from that day forward, will depart to the ends of the earth, or that he himself will carry her away somewhere, where that dreaded rival will not get neaer her. Of course the reconciliation is only for an hour. For, even if the rival did disappear next day, he would invent another one and would be jealous of him. And one might wonder what there was in a love that had to be so watched over, what a love could be worth that needed such strenuous guarding. But that the jealous will never understand. And yet among them are men of noble hearts. It is remarkable, too, that those very men of noble hearts, standing hidden in some cupboard, listening and spying, never feel the strings of conscience at that moment, anyway, though they understand clearly enough with their &ldquo;noble hearts&rdquo; the shameful depths to which they have voluntarily sunk.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption"><cite>Page 382</cite></div></div><p>In this next piece, I can&rsquo;t tell if she&rsquo;s serious or crazy or taking the piss and, if so, whether she does that deliberately and maliciously. The old woman is proposing to loan Dmitri money in the form of the idea of telling him to go find gold mines and mine them. Subsequent passages indicate that Dmitri took this suggestion seriously but discarded it because of its being too much work.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The money is as good as in your pocket, not three thousand, but three million, Dmitri Fyodorovitch, in less than no time. I&rsquo;ll make you a present of the idea: you shall find gold-mines, make millions, return and become a leading man, and wake us up and lead us to better things.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption"><cite>Page 386-387</cite></div></div><p>Kolya and his mother, in a classic relationship:</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;He was extremely vain. He knew how to make even his mother give way to him; he was almost despotic in his control of her. She gave way to him, oh, she had given way to him for years. The one thought unendurable to her was that her boy had no great love for her. She was always fancying that Kolya was &ldquo;unfeeling&rdquo; to her, and at times, dissolving into hysterical tears, she used to reproach him with his coldness. The boy disliked this, and the more demonstrations of feeling were demanded of him the more he seemed intentionally to avoid them. Yet it was not intentional on his part but instinctive—it was his character. His mother was mistaken; he was very fond of her. He only disliked &ldquo;sheepish sentimentality&rdquo;, as he expressed it in his schoolboy language.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption"><cite>Page 511</cite></div></div><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Habit is the greatest motive-power.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>The captain is extremely poor and the doctor appears at his home to advise him on his ailing son. The doctor recommends experts in Paris, to which the captain responds,</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Doctor, doctor! But you see!&rdquo; the captain flung wide his hands again despairingly, indicating the bare wooden walls of the passage.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption"><cite>Page 555</cite></div></div><p>The captain is ashamed to directly address his poverty but appeals instead for the doctor to adjust his diagnosis and recommendation to something appropriate to the circumstances. The doctor responds quite coldly,</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Well, that&rsquo;s not my business,&ldquo; grinned the doctor. &ldquo;I have only told you the answer of medical science to your question as to possible treatment. As for the rest, to my regret—&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption"><cite>Page 555</cite></div></div><p>While his answer is most likely correct, it is cold and ignores the duty of the a doctor to provide at least a modicum of comfort. If there&rsquo;s nothing to be done, there is no point in mentioning all of the things that could be done were more money available. In honestly, the experts in Paris probably couldn&rsquo;t do anything either but suck money from the patient&rsquo;s father&rsquo;s pockets. But the world and its solutions are for the rich. The cruelty lies in the doctor reminding the captain of that in the depths of his pathos.</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Brother, these last two months I&rsquo;ve found in myself a new man. A new man has risen up in me. He was hidden in me, but would never have come to the surface, if it hadn&rsquo;t been for this blow from heaven. I am afraid! And what do I care if I spend twenty years in the mines, breaking ore with a hammer? I am not a bit afraid of that—it&rsquo;s something else I am afraid of now: that that new man may leave me. Even there, in the mines, under-ground, I may find a human heart in another convict and murderer by my side, and I may make friends with him, for even there one may live and love and suffer. One may thaw and revive a frozen heart in that convict, one may wait upon him for years, and at last bring up from the dark depths a lofty soul, a feeling, suffering creature: one may bring forth an angel, a create a hero! There are so many of them, hundreds of them, and we are all to blame for them.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div></div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption"><cite>How could you help reckoning on him? if he killed him, then he would lose all the rights of a nobleman, his rank and property, and would go off to exile; so his share of the inheritance would come to you and your brother Alexey Fyodorovitch in equal parts; so you&#039;d each have not forty, but sixty thousand each. There&#039;s not a doubt you did reckon on Dmitri Fyodorovitch</cite></div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;That was quite right what you taught me, for you talked a lot to me about that. For if there&rsquo;s no everlasting God, there&rsquo;s no such thing as virtue, and there&rsquo;s no need of it. You were right there. So that&rsquo;s how I looked at it.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption"><cite>Page 628–629</cite></div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;He had unmistakably been, at some time, in good and fashionable society, had once had good connections, had possibly preserved them indeed, but, after a gay youth, becoming gradually impoverished on the abolition of serfdom, he had sunk into the position of a poor relation of the best class, wandering from one good old friend to another and received by them for his companionable and accommodating disposition and as being, after all, a gentleman who could be asked to sit down with any one, though, of course, not in a place of honor. Such gentlemen of accommodating temper and dependent position, who can tell a story, take a hand at cards, and who have a distinct aversion for any duties that may be forced upon them, are usually solitary creatures, either bachelors or widowers.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption"><cite>Page 632</cite></div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;What would become of an ax in space? <em>Quelle idée!</em> If it were to fall to any distance, it would being, I think, flying round the earth without knowing why, like a satellite. The astronomers would calculate the rising and the setting of the ax, <em>Gatzuk</em> would put it in his calendar, that&rsquo;s all.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption"><cite>Page 637</cite></div></div><p>And this is possibly the inspiration for the most-famous utterance of Marvin the paranoid android.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Philosophy, indeed, when all my right side is numb and I am moaning and groaning. I&rsquo;ve tried all the medical faculty: they can diagnose beautifully, they have the whole of your disease at their finger-tips, but they&rsquo;ve no idea how to cure you.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption"><cite>Page 637-638</cite></div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;&lt;Why, you keep thinking of our present earth! But our present earth may have been repeated a billion times. Why, it&rsquo;s become extinct, been frozen; cracked, broken into bits, disintegrated into its elements, again &lsquo;the water above the firmament,&rsquo; then again a comet, again a sun, again from the sun it becomes earth—and the same sequence may have been repeated endlessly and exactly the same to every detail, most unseemly and insufferably tedious—&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption"><cite>Page 641-642</cite></div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;in his opinion the prisoner was now, and had been all along, in a perfectly normal condition, and, although he certainly must have been in a nervous and exceedingly excited state before his arrest, this might have been due to several perfectly obvious causes, jealousy, anger, <strong>continual drunkenness</strong>, and so on. (Emphasis added.)&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption"><cite>Page 672</cite></div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;At the first temptation—for instance, to entertain the woman with whom he had already squandered half the money—he would have unpicked his little bag and have taken out some hundred roubles, for why should he have taken back precisely half the money, that is, fifteen hundred roubles? Why not fourteen hundred? He could just as well have said then that he was not a thief, because he brought back fourteen hundred roubles. Then another time he would have unpicked it again and taken out another hundred, and then a third, and then a fourth, and before the end of the month he would have taken the last note but one, feeling that if he took back only a hundred it would answer the purpose, for a thief would have stolen it all. And then he would have looked at this last note, and have said to himself, &lsquo;It&rsquo;s really not worth while to give back one hundred; let&rsquo;s spend that, too!&rsquo; That&rsquo;s how the real Dmitri Karamazov, as we know him, would have behaved. One cannot imagine anything more incongruous with the actual fact than this legend of the little bag.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption"><cite>Page 700–701</cite></div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;By some pre-temporal assignment, which I have never been able to figure out, I am appointed ‘to negate,’ whereas I am sincerely kind and totally unable to negate. No, they say, go and negate, without negation there can be no criticism, and what sort of journal has no ‘criticism section.’ Without criticism, there would be nothing but ‘Hosannahs.’ But Hosannahs alone are not enough for life, it is necessary that this “Hosannah’ pass through the crucible of doubt, and so on, in the same vein. I don’t meddle with any of that, by the way, I didn’t create it, and I can’t answer for it. So they chose themselves a scapegoat, they made me write for the criticism section, and life came about. We understand this comedy: I, for instance, demand simply and directly that I be destroyed. No, they say, live! Because without you there would be nothing. If everything on Earth were sensible, nothing would happen. Without you, there would be no events, and there must be events. <strong>And so, I serve, grudgingly, for the sake of events, and I do the unreasonable on orders. People take this whole comedy for something serious, despite all their undeniable intelligence. That is their tragedy.</strong>&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">from The Devil [or Ivan K&rsquo;s fever-dream of him</div></div><h2>Errata</h2><p>When I read books that I downloaded from <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org">Gutenberg Project</a>, I like to be helpful and provide corrections where I can. They have a very friendly and responsive errata-submission system.</p>
<pre class=" ">Page 24:
  J&rsquo;ai bu l&rsquo;ombre d&rsquo;un cocher qui avec l&rsquo;ombre d&rsquo;une brosse frottait
    replace &ldquo;bu&rdquo; with &ldquo;vu&rdquo;; J&rsquo;ai [vu] l&rsquo;ombre d&rsquo;un cocher qui avec

Page 564–565:
  What a girl I am! Blurring things out!
    Replace &ldquo;Blurring&rdquo; with &ldquo;Blurting&rdquo;; What a girl I am! Blurting things out!

Page 700-701
  fifteen hundred roubles? why not fourteen hundred?
    Capitalize &ldquo;why&rdquo;; [W]hy not fourteen hundred?</pre>      </div>
      </div>
        <div class="footer">
    <div class="footer-data"><div class="footer-links"><ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/contact.php" title="">Contact</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/support.php" title="">Support</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/privacy.php" title="">Privacy</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/rights.php" title="">Rights</a></li></ul></div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="copyright">Copyright (c) 1999-2026 earthli.com. All Rights Reserved.</div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="versions">Powered by <ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore/app_news.php">earthli News 3.7</a></li><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore" title="">earthli WebCore&trade; 3.7</a></li></ul></div></div>    </div>
      </div>
  </div>  </body>
</html>
]]>
  </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
      <title type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[I Never Promised You a Rose Garden by Joanne Greenberg (Read in 2014)]]>
  </title>
    <id>https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=2893</id>
    <link href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=2893"/>
    <updated>2015-03-29T18:22:07+02:00</updated>
    <author>
        <name type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[(withheld)]]>
  </name>
    </author>
      <summary type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<blockquote class="quote abstract "><div>Disclaimer: these are notes I took while reading this book. They include citations I found interesting or enlightening or particularly well-written. In some cases, I&rsquo;ve pointed out which of these applies to which citation; in others, I have not. Any benefit you gain from reading these notes is... [<a class="complete-text-link" href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=2893">More</a>]</div></blockquote>]]>
  </summary>
      <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<html lang="en">
  <head>
    <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/themes/ice.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/fonts/raleway.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/core/medium.css">
  </head>
  <body>
<div class="style-controls">  <div class="page">
    <div class="page-body">
<div class="info-box-top">
<p>
Published by <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_user.php?name=root" title="(withheld)" class="visible">root</a> on <span class="date-time">29. Mar 2015 18:22:07 (GMT-5)</span>
</p>
<p>
Updated by <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_user.php?name=root" title="(withheld)" class="visible">root</a> on <span class="date-time">29. Mar 2015 18:24:01 (GMT-5)</span>
</p>
</div>
      <div class="text-flow wide">
  <blockquote class="quote abstract "><div>Disclaimer: these are notes I took while reading this book. They include citations I found interesting or enlightening or particularly well-written. In some cases, I&rsquo;ve pointed out which of these applies to which citation; in others, I have not. Any benefit you gain from reading these notes is purely incidental to the purpose they serve of reminding me what I once read. Please see Wikipedia for a summary if I&rsquo;ve failed to provide one sufficient for your purposes. If my notes serve to trigger an interest in this book, then I&rsquo;m happy for you.</div></blockquote><p>On page 173: In other places, we&rsquo;ve seen tantrums/fits of others, as seen by Deborah. In this case, we are party to a tantrum as experienced from within, as inspired by Deborah&rsquo;s rich inner life. She explains how her erratic, senseless hand motions are actually a private language, as are her babblings. To us, it is all just insanity; to her, it is structured and logical.</p>
<p>On page 175: Here, again, are more examples, of words and gestures that have meaning to those who understand them. Is there a difference between an insane person and someone who agitatedly speaks a private language—or a language not shared by his or her audience?</p>
<p>There are several instances where she writes that her senses just shut down. She sees in only two dimensions; she can barely hear anything; she sees only shades of gray and often through a pinhole, a keyhole, a slit. She cannot feel anything. She burns her flesh and doesn&rsquo;t feel the pain. She eats but does not taste and does not remember having eaten.</p>
<p>She tells of watching other patients in this catatonia, being struck by other wild patients and not reacting at all. They only blink slowly. This is a communication failure between one without senses and one with a private language. It&rsquo;s utterly fascinating when thought of in these terms.</p>
<p>It&rsquo;s also a metaphor for how the so-called normal people interact with one another, making the same mistakes but less overtly and less catastrophically poorly. On a class, caste or national level, the catastrophic miscommunication is the same.</p>
<h2>Citations</h2><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;'You are not so stupid and neither am I,&lsquo; Furii said earnestly, trying to speak across the widening space. &lsquo;There are many secrets to come and you know it. You are not parting with food that sustained you—all the secrets and the secret powers—and no other nourishment has yet appeared to replace it. This is the hardest time of all, harder than even your sickness was before you came here. At least <em>that</em> had a meaning for you, as awful as the meaning was sometimes. You will have to trust me enough to take on faith that the new food, when it comes, will be richer.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 109</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo; She believed that she and a certain few others were not of the same <em>nganon</em> as the rest of Earth&rsquo;s people. At first Deborah had thought that it was only she who was set apart from human kind, but others of the un-dead on D ward seemed to be tainted as she was. All of her life, herself and all her possessions had been imbued with her essence, the poisonous <em>nganon</em>. She had never lent her clothes or books or pencils, or let anyone touch any of her things, and she had often borrowed or stolen from other children at school or camp, delighting, until their stolen <em>nganon</em> wore off them, in the health and purity and grace of the possessions.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 127</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Deborah looked from the god and saw Carla still crying. It was part of the Deceit, it seemed, to believe that one knew the code, that after years of suffering to find a way to outguess it, the final step gave way and there was the old chaos, anarchy, and laughter.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 149</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Perhaps it might be the one about seeing—that even when seeing every line and plane and color of a thing, if there was no meaning, the sight was irrelevant and one was just as well blind; that perhaps even the famous third dimension is only meaning, the gift which translates a bunch of planes into a box or a madonna or a Dr. Halle with antiseptic bottle.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 158</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;'What?&rsquo; Dr. Halle turned. Deborah looked at him in horror. Her words to Yr had pierced the barriers of the earth&rsquo;s hearing. The clamor from the Collect built higher until it was an overwhelming roar and the gray vision went red. Without warning the full PUnishment fell like an executioner&rsquo;s hand and the testimony of light, space, time, gravity, and the five senses became meaningless. Heat froze and light hurled tactile stabbing rays. She had no sense of where her body was; there was no up or down, no location or distance, no chain of cause and effect…&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 159</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;When the lawgivers of D ward discovered that its patients were not so safe as they had thought, they swept the ward up and down with reforms to widen still further the distance between themselves and the patients. The fork that had been introduced on &ldquo;D&rdquo; a year before was now rescinded. The Age of Metal gave way to the Age of Wood and fire prevailed only within the precincts of the nursing station, the modern era. In the [P]leistocene beyond, Pithecanthropus erectus shambled and muttered gibberish, ate with its fingers, and wet on the floor.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 163</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;'<em>Recreat,&lsquo;</em> Deborah said. &lsquo;<em>Recreat xangoran, temr e xangoranan. Naza e fango xangoranan. Inai dum. Agaei dum.&rsquo; (Remember me. Remember me in anger, frear me in bitter anger. Hear-draze my teeth in bitterest anger. The signal glance drops. The Game&rsquo;—Agaei mena the tearing of flesh with teeth as torture—&rsquo;is over.&lsquo;)</em>&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 173</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;&rsquo;No.&lsquo; She tried to tell Furii, but the walls began bleeding and sweating, and the ceiling developed a large tumor which began to separate itself from its surface.</p>
<p>&ldquo;&lsquo;Can you hear me?&rsquo; Furii asked.</p>
<p>&ldquo;Deborah tried to say what she felt, but she could only gesture the Yri gesture for insanity: flattened hands thrust toward one another but unable to meet.<br>
&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 175</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;In the bathroom: &lsquo;Blau—are you in there?&rsquo;</p>
<p>&ldquo;&lsquo;Here is <em>cutucu</em>.&rsquo; (The second degree of being hidden.) As she struggled to translate, finding it almost impossible to span the light years of distance between herself and them, the confusion of tongues only alienated her further.&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 181</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The volcano&rsquo;s fear-rage would still come and throw her against a wall with the force of its eruption, or send her running down the hall until she was stopped by a closed door or a wall. She was in pack every day, sometimes twice, and once tightened in, she would let the fight explode and overcome her as violently as it would. Yet … yet they were all kinder, all the nurses and attendants, joking even, and giving little gifts of themselves.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 186</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;'Well, we&rsquo;ll give it a try.&lsquo; She saw in his face that the burns were worse than he had remembered. When he was through, he said, &lsquo;I tried to go easy. I hope it didn&rsquo;t hurt too much.&lsquo;</p>
<p>&ldquo;&lsquo;Don&rsquo;t worry,&lsquo; Deborah said, and rose the tremendous distance from the falling Anterrabae to be capable of a smile. &lsquo;Someday, maybe it will.&rsquo;&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 192–193</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;All Deborah heard were the sounds of her own gasps of exhaustion as she climbed an Everest that was to everyone else an easy and a level plain.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 207</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;She yearned to play with all the toys of the earth, while Yr and the world&rsquo;s darker parts fought it out inside her. To Earth&rsquo;s usages and people she felt she could never come, but to the material things there was new access and freedom and great reward. A new patient asked her what she was, meaning her religion, and she found herself answering, &lsquo;A Newtonian.&rsquo;&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 211</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;[…] Deborah began to feel the mood was less about Carmen&rsquo;s suicide than an argument between the cynicism that was in each of them and the blind, small longing to fight.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 219</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;It was B ward&rsquo;s nerve; a desperate hope that the false &lsquo;fine-fine&rsquo; might see them through if only they acted <em>long</em> enough and tried to make it be the truth. Was it as frightening a clutching at convention on the outside?&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 220</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;One day, coming from an exhausting session with Furii, Deborah saw a knot of people in the hall, and coming closer she saw that they were writhing, slow motion, like creatures under water. At the center of the knot, all but hidden by it, was Miss Coral. Because Deborah&rsquo;s  loyalty had not shifted with her commitment to the world, she had to choke back a guffaw. The bed-flinging genius of fulcrum, weight, and thrust was at it again! Deborah wondered how she had gotten off the ward. She was standing almost still in the middle of the melee, taking on five attendants by drawing them into battle with each other. Her rant was a low mutter, like an engine, full of long sibilances and obscenity. Deborah passed by and tossed a &lsquo;Hell, Miss coral,&rsquo; more for the attendants than for the lady herself. Miss Coral removed her concentration from her war and smiled to Deborah.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 240</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;[In the courthouse building] she found others takign their high-school educations at one gulp—a group of hard-handed day laborers who sweated and grunted over their papers as if they were blocks of grnite. She was surprised and then humbled that they, too, though not prisoners or insane, had somehow missed beats in the rhythm of the world, and now were sharers with her in this necessary thing.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 246</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;On the field the boys were running with the late-afternoon magic of their ten-foot shadows. They seemed so young and strong and golden in the late sun. It had taken afll of her capacities, every drop of her will, to come as far as they had come laughing and easy. The wall between them was still there and it would always be there. She could see through it now, to where the world offered its immense beauty, but she would burn away all her strength just staying alive.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 247</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;She looked again at the faces on the ward. Her presence was making them struggle with Maybes. Suddenly she realized that she was a Doris Rivera, a living symbol of hope and failure and the terror they all felt of their own resiliency and hers, reeling punch-drunk from beating after beating, yet, at the secret bell, up again for more.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 250</div></div>      </div>
      </div>
        <div class="footer">
    <div class="footer-data"><div class="footer-links"><ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/contact.php" title="">Contact</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/support.php" title="">Support</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/privacy.php" title="">Privacy</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/rights.php" title="">Rights</a></li></ul></div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="copyright">Copyright (c) 1999-2026 earthli.com. All Rights Reserved.</div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="versions">Powered by <ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore/app_news.php">earthli News 3.7</a></li><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore" title="">earthli WebCore&trade; 3.7</a></li></ul></div></div>    </div>
      </div>
  </div>  </body>
</html>
]]>
  </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
      <title type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[Let's Explore Diabetes with Owls by David Sedaris (Read in 2014)]]>
  </title>
    <id>https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3048</id>
    <link href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3048"/>
    <updated>2015-03-29T18:20:13+02:00</updated>
    <author>
        <name type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[(withheld)]]>
  </name>
    </author>
      <summary type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<blockquote class="quote abstract "><div>Disclaimer: these are notes I took while reading this book. They include citations I found interesting or enlightening or particularly well-written. In some cases, I&rsquo;ve pointed out which of these applies to which citation; in others, I have not. Any benefit you gain from reading these notes is... [<a class="complete-text-link" href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3048">More</a>]</div></blockquote>]]>
  </summary>
      <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<html lang="en">
  <head>
    <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/themes/ice.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/fonts/raleway.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/core/medium.css">
  </head>
  <body>
<div class="style-controls">  <div class="page">
    <div class="page-body">
<div class="info-box-top">
<p>
Published by <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_user.php?name=root" title="(withheld)" class="visible">root</a> on <span class="date-time">29. Mar 2015 18:20:13 (GMT-5)</span>
</p>
</div>
      <div class="text-flow wide">
  <blockquote class="quote abstract "><div>Disclaimer: these are notes I took while reading this book. They include citations I found interesting or enlightening or particularly well-written. In some cases, I&rsquo;ve pointed out which of these applies to which citation; in others, I have not. Any benefit you gain from reading these notes is purely incidental to the purpose they serve of reminding me what I once read. Please see Wikipedia for a summary if I&rsquo;ve failed to provide one sufficient for your purposes. If my notes serve to trigger an interest in this book, then I&rsquo;m happy for you.</div></blockquote><h2>Citations</h2><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>"No!&rdquo; screams McKinley or Madison, Kennedy or Lincoln or beet-faced baby Reagan. Looking on, I always want to intervene. &ldquo;Listen,&rdquo; I&rsquo;d like to say, &ldquo;I&rsquo;m not a parent myself, but I think the best solution at this point is to slap that child across the face. It won&rsquo;t stop its crying, but at least now it&rsquo;ll be doing it for a good reason.</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption"><cite>Page 14–15</cite></div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The people I hung out with in my early twenties were middle class and, at least to our minds, artistic. We&rsquo;d all turned our backs on privilege, but comfortably, the way you can when you still have access to it. No one wanted to call home asking for money, but we all knew that in a punch our parents would come through for us. It was this, more than race, that set apart from Delicia, for how could someone on the bottom rung of the ladder not be outraged by the unfairness of it all?&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption"><cite>Page 42–43</cite></div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;[…] It doesn&rsquo;t take many people to muck up a roadside. A devoted handful can do the trick. One of the things I find repeatedly is a plastic Diet Coke bottle containing a meticulously folded Mars bar wrapper. I imagine this is someone&rsquo;s after-work snack and that by putting the wrapper inside the empty bottle, the person feels he&rsquo;s done his bit. And though he <em>has</em> turned two pieces of trash into one, until he learns to keep it in his car, I don&rsquo;t think he&rsquo;s entitled to pat himself on the back. <em>Who are you?</em> I wondered the first and third and fifth time I cam across one of these stuffed bottles. <em>Do you think about the four hundred years it will take for this to decompose, or is this as inconsequential to you as flushing a toilet?</em>&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption"><cite>Page 160</cite></div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;It&rsquo;s not lost on me that I&rsquo;m so busy recording life, I don&rsquo;t have time to really live it. I&rsquo;ve become like one of those people I hate, the sort who go to the museum and, instead of looking at the magnificent Brueghel, take a picture of it, reducing it from art to proof. It&rsquo;s not &ldquo;Look what Brueghel did, painted this masterpieces&rdquo; but &ldquo;Look what <em>I</em> did, went to Rotterdam and stood in front of a Brueghel painting!&rdquo;&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption"><cite>Page 165–166</cite></div></div>      </div>
      </div>
        <div class="footer">
    <div class="footer-data"><div class="footer-links"><ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/contact.php" title="">Contact</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/support.php" title="">Support</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/privacy.php" title="">Privacy</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/rights.php" title="">Rights</a></li></ul></div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="copyright">Copyright (c) 1999-2026 earthli.com. All Rights Reserved.</div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="versions">Powered by <ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore/app_news.php">earthli News 3.7</a></li><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore" title="">earthli WebCore&trade; 3.7</a></li></ul></div></div>    </div>
      </div>
  </div>  </body>
</html>
]]>
  </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
      <title type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[Reamde by Neal Stephenson (Read in 2014)]]>
  </title>
    <id>https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=2949</id>
    <link href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=2949"/>
    <updated>2015-03-29T18:18:56+02:00</updated>
    <author>
        <name type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[(withheld)]]>
  </name>
    </author>
      <summary type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<blockquote class="quote abstract "><div>Disclaimer: these are notes I took while reading this book. They include citations I found interesting or enlightening or particularly well-written. In some cases, I&rsquo;ve pointed out which of these applies to which citation; in others, I have not. Any benefit you gain from reading these notes is... [<a class="complete-text-link" href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=2949">More</a>]</div></blockquote>]]>
  </summary>
      <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<html lang="en">
  <head>
    <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/themes/ice.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/fonts/raleway.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/core/medium.css">
  </head>
  <body>
<div class="style-controls">  <div class="page">
    <div class="page-body">
<div class="info-box-top">
<p>
Published by <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_user.php?name=root" title="(withheld)" class="visible">root</a> on <span class="date-time">29. Mar 2015 18:18:56 (GMT-5)</span>
</p>
</div>
      <div class="text-flow wide">
  <blockquote class="quote abstract "><div>Disclaimer: these are notes I took while reading this book. They include citations I found interesting or enlightening or particularly well-written. In some cases, I&rsquo;ve pointed out which of these applies to which citation; in others, I have not. Any benefit you gain from reading these notes is purely incidental to the purpose they serve of reminding me what I once read. Please see Wikipedia for a summary if I&rsquo;ve failed to provide one sufficient for your purposes. If my notes serve to trigger an interest in this book, then I&rsquo;m happy for you.</div></blockquote><h2>Notes</h2><ul>
<li>The forces of good and evil were arbitrary. The forces of Brightness and the Earth-tones line up remarkably well with Devin and the Don, respectively</li>
<li>The game of T&rsquo;Rain gets its style from World of Warcraft, but it&rsquo;s economy from EVE Online, although it takes it a few steps further.</li></ul><p>The sweeping, all-encompassing nature of the plot reminded me strongly of the Baroque Cycle (also by Stephenson). His attention to detail in some cases was at times tedious, but his dialogue and character development are top-notch. There are plenty of cool heroes here, with only a handful of them belonging to the 1%, unlike so many other escapist fiction these days. </p>
<p>The Cryptonomicon took us to Southeast Asia with hackers and programmers and dealt with ultra-secret code-crackers, chip-manufacturing plants and groups of people connected by tenuous though strands over decades.</p>
<p>This book also takes us to Southeast Asia but many other places besides, with a good part of it taking place in the Pacific Northwest, on both sides of the U.S./Canadian border.</p>
<p>I&rsquo;m going to try to summarize what I remember having happened in this book because it was quite literally one of the wildest rides I&rsquo;ve read, with what would have been ludicrous coincidences detailed in Stephenson&rsquo;s style. Spoilers abound, so proceed with caution.</p>
<p>The story introduces the linchpin character, Richard Forthrast at a shooting range at his annual family reunion. Richard is older, unmarried and has a tremendous amount of living behind him. He also happens to own much of and still run a gigantic Blizzard-like company that manages an online world called T&rsquo;Rain, which is similar to but in many ways superior to World of Warcraft.</p>
<p>At the reunion, he is reintroduced to his adoptive niece Zula, who is accompanied by her somewhat socially inept but technically talented hacker-boyfriend, Peter. These two would visit Richard later at his chalet/board-bum resort north of the border in Canada. Richard purchased the place as his base of operations when he used to run a successful pot-smuggling operation from Canada into the US, using a passage that he&rsquo;d discovered through the mountains.</p>
<p>Peter meets an enigmatic man named Wallace at the chalet, a meeting observed with diffident suspicion by Richard and Zula. Zula is, at this point, working for Richard on terrain-generation algorithms, designed to make the online world of T&rsquo;Rain more realistic and firmly anchored in a believable physical reality.</p>
<p>They part ways, with Richard staying in Canada and Peter and Zula heading back to Seattle. Wallace follows them, showing up at Peter&rsquo;s apartment, demanding to know what&rsquo;s going on with his data. It turns out that the USB stick that Peter used to transfer the credit-card numbers he sold to Wallace was infected with the Reamde virus. It&rsquo;s a cryptolocker virus that has locked up not only the credit-card numbers but also a lot of other data that Wallace was keeping for a bunch of Russian mobsters, headed by Ivanov and his chief of security, Sokolov.</p>
<p>The writer of the virus added a twist to the payment mechanism: the only way to pay off the ransom and unlock the data is to enter the world of T&rsquo;Rain and deposit an amount of in-game gold at a prearranged location. Zula, an amateur at the game, along with Wallace, a seasoned regular, try for an entire all-nighter to deposit what amounts to only a thousand dollars but are unable to do so because of a tremendous number of other players who are laying siege to the Torgai foothils where thousands of victims of the Reamde virus are all trying to deposit their ransoms. There are bands of players paid by the writers of the virus to protect depositors and roving bands of bandits trying to steal a tremendous amount of gold on the hoof.</p>
<p>Zula used her pull at T&rsquo;Rain HQ to find out where the hackers and originators of the virus are located. It turns out that they are in Xiamen in the People&rsquo;s Republic of China. Ivanov takes the reins and decides to fly his crew as well as Peter and Zula in a private jet to China after a brief stopover in Russia where they are joined by a Hungarian hacker named Csongor. Wallace is not invited along and is dispatched.</p>
<p>The Russians, the Hungarian, the American and the Eritrean/American set up shop in a half-built office building in downtown Xiamen and are confronted with the immensity and density of the Chinese city. There is a saying that if you are told of an Indian or Chinese city whose name you&rsquo;ve never heard, there are good odds that the city has a larger population than New York or Los Angeles. Stephenson spends a good deal of time driving this impression home, but in a good way.</p>
<p>The hackers, Zula and Solokov canvass the neighborhoods, using local Internet cafés to try to pinpoint the nest of hackers responsible for Reamde by their IP address. They are eventually successful and meet up with Yuxia, a local Hakka villager working in the big city who happens to own a van. The Russians enter the building with their hostages in tow and through more detection discover that the hacker nest must be on either the fourth or fifth floor.</p>
<p>Deep breath. Here&rsquo;s where things get really crazy.</p>
<p>On the fourth floor are the Reamde hackers. On the fifth floor is a nest of Islamist terrorists led by the Welsh Abdallah Jones, reknowned and hunted worldwide for many destructive acts of terror. He and his crew are planning an attack in or near Xiamen. In the building across the way is Olivia, an MI6 agent hot on his tail and gathering information about this next strike. She is a well-trained but is more about electronic espionage than hand-to-hand combat and weapons. She will have to learn fast.</p>
<p>Zula does not know this, but feels that sending Spetznaz soldiers into the nest of Chinese hackers is decidedly disproportionate to their crimes and sends the soldiers to the fifth floor instead. At this point, all hell breaks loose: most of the Russians and Islamists are killed in a shootout, killed either by Solokov, who is an amazing survivor or Jones, who is a ruthless and efficient survivor as well. The hackers scuttle out of the windows like cockroaches, introducing us to their leader, Marlon.</p>
<p>The firefight sets off the truly enormous amount of explosives that the Islamists had created, blowing off the entire top of the building and dropping much of it into the street. The explosion tears off the part of the floor where Olivia had set up camp and disables her entire operation and her temporarily unconscious. </p>
<p>And the others? Sokolov shimmies across cables to Olivia&rsquo;s building and briefly meets her there, plucking her purse from the trash. Peter is killed in the stairway by Ivanov. Jones kills Ivanov and kidnaps Zula. Csongor, Marlon and Yuxia somehow meet and escape in Yuxia&rsquo;s van.</p>
<p>Sokolov uses his awesome spy resources to get clothes and cash and makes his way to Olivia, who he is convinced is his only way out of the country in which he finds himself without an entry visa or passport. Zula is taken by Jones to the airport where they hijack Ivanov&rsquo;s jet and head off for Canada, hiding beneath another jet to stay off the radar. Olivia ends up arranging for her departure, taking Sokolov with her. They split up when he is shunted off to a boat arranged by MI6, where he is ambushed. Olivia heads to the Philippines to try to find Jones. There she meets a CIA agent named Seamus, who is another cool Stephenson character. After an operation that fails to find Jones, she&rsquo;s pulled off the case and heads back to England.</p>
<p>Csongor, Marlon and Yuxia tail Zula and Jones to the docks but can&rsquo;t rescue her and they end up hijacking a boat and heading for the open sea. They cross the sea on wind power and wind up in the Philippines, where they are robbed of the rest of Ivanov&rsquo;s money but still have enough cash to get to a hotel and an Internet café. It is here that Marlon starts his mission in T&rsquo;Rain to start gathering the millions of dollars in ransom that his exceedingly powerful character—Reamde—has stashed all over the Torgai foothills. Stephenson does a lovely job describing the game world, how Marlon gathers his compatriots and Csongor starts a new character in T&rsquo;Rain—he&rsquo;s never played before—and helps Marlon by finding a broker/priest to handle his huge transaction.</p>
<p>Richard, meanwhile, has not been idle and has been feverishly searching for Zula. Olivia has flown to Seattle to pursue a hunch that Jones flew to Canada with his stolen plane and has met up with Richard to compare notes. Another thread that runs through the novel is a war that has cropped up in the game world, between the forces of Brightness and the Earthtone coalition. These roughly line up with the two main authors of the history and narrative of T&rsquo;Rain. One is a Cambridge Don (double D) who is roughly analogous to J.R.R. Tolkien or George R.R. Martin, living in his own castle and being very literary and erudite. The other is nicknamed Skeletor and lives in the Midwest, churning out a tremendous amount of pulp content with less regard for continuity or canon. This part, while exceedingly interesting, has a lot less to do with the main action part of the plot.</p>
<p>Once Richard and his chief of technology discover what&rsquo;s going on, he pulls out his for all intents and purposes indestructible character Egdod to kick some ass and take some names. He sends an asteroid down with an ancient spell, a spell that has been used just once before, but Seamus shows up at the same Internet café, joins the game with his powerful character and gets Marlon to trust him so that he can &ldquo;pull&rdquo; him out of danger. Egdod manages to squash a lot of terrain and characters, but misses Reamde, amazingly enough.</p>
<p>But then, just as Marlon arrives with his gemstones, having fought his way to the main trading floor and found a priest to make his transfer, it turns out that the priest is controlled by an administrator, who lets Egdod know that Reamde has been located. Egdod shows up like an Old Testament God and plucks Csongor and Marlon out of the market and gives them an ultimatum: they tell him what happened to Zula; Marlon gets to keep his cash.</p>
<p>That&rsquo;s kind of the end of act 2. Jones and Zula were traveling around Canada in a fortified RV, joined by many of his cell members located in Canada and the U.S. Zula tells Jones about Richard in order to save her life, thinking that Jones will ransom her off to her rich uncle. However, Jones is more interested in Richard&rsquo;s well-publicized knowledge of ways of sneaking into the States. So the Islamist wagon train heads off to Richard&rsquo;s chalet/compound in British Columbia. They catch Richard in his chalet just as he&rsquo;s caught Marlon and kidnap him, heading off over the border with the first party of terrorists. The others are left behind with Zula. At the same time, Zula makes her long-planned escape and meets up with Chet, Richard&rsquo;s business partner, who rescues her on his motorcycle before being critically wounded. They press onward on the route that Chet knows quite well too, chasing after Jones and Richard.</p>
<p>Olivia has in the meantime met back up with Sokolov, who has sneaked into the U.S. (of course) and they are headed to Richard&rsquo;s brother Jake&rsquo;s isolationist/gun-nut compound in northern Idaho just south of the border where Richard&rsquo;s secret passage pops into the U.S.</p>
<p>Seamus gets a military flight to take Marlon, Csongor and Yuxia into the U.S. as well and they also drift northward, working on the same hunch that Jones and Zula will be crossing the border in that area. Yuxia and Seamus hire a helicopter to reconnoiter the area, leaving Marlon and Csongor behind in an SUV. When Yuxia and Seamus don&rsquo;t return quickly enough, Marlon and Csongor head toward Jake&rsquo;s compound as well, although they get there by tailing suspicious Islamists rather than heading there on purpose.</p>
<p>Richard escapes as well, Chet blows up a very dangerous sniper with a claymore suicide-bomb, Zula meets up with Richard and Sokolov and Olivia save the say, gathering in Zula into their party. There is a gigantic mêlée at Jake&rsquo;s compound and in the surrounding woods with Jones finally getting his just desserts and everybody else pulling through.</p>
<p>The epilogue shows Sokolov and Olivia in England and everyone else at the next family reunion or joining in via video call. And they all lived happily ever after.</p>
<h2>Citations</h2><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Factory workers watching widgets stream off the assembly line, inspecting them for defects, out to be able to metaphrase their work into something was more neuron[-]grabbing, such as flying up a river valley on a winged steed, gazing into its limpid waters at the rocks strewn up its channel, looking for the one that contained traces of some magical ore.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption"><cite>Page 97</cite></div></div><p>This seems to be the crux, the reason, he wrote this book. its a potentially revolutionary idea.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;A shadow appeared in one of them: the silhouette of a man. He vaulted over the windowsill, performed a shoulder roll, and alighted on the office floor in a low crouch. In the same movements he unslung a Kalashnikov from his shoulder and brought it up ready to fire.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption"><cite>Page 228</cite></div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;And so,&ldquo; Jones concluded, &ldquo;things are about to get ubly. Not that they were pretty to begin with. But, during the journey, you might wish to consider how you can keep them from really getting out of hand. I would suggest an end to pluck, or spunk, or whatever label you like to attach to the sort of behavior you were showing back on that pier, and a decisive turn toward <em>Islam</em>: which means submission. Just a thought.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption"><cite>Page 273</cite></div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;There&rsquo;s vodka in the bar,&rdquo; The spy Olivia said that in Russian. Sokolov guessed now, from her accent and from her freewheeling approach to dispensation of alcoholic beverages, that she was British.</p>
<p>&ldquo;Thank you, but I am a Russian of somewhat unusual habits and will not be taking this opportunity to get drunk.&rdquo;</p>
<p>She was a little slow to take that sentence in, but she got the git of it. Her Russian was, perhaps, slightly better than his English. They would have to switch back and forth and watch each other&rsquo;s faces.</p>
<p>I am going to take every opportunity I can find,&ldquo; she responded, and went over to the bar—really just a cabinet with a few bottles in it—and took out a bottle of Jack Daniel&rsquo;s.</p>
<p>&ldquo;You should not become heavily intoxicated,&rdquo; he said, &ldquo;since further action may be required soon.&rdquo;</p>
<p>The look she gave him made it evident that she was at some pains to avoid laughing in his face.</p>
<p>Where had he gone wrong?</p>
<p>By assuming that she would trust him.</p>
<p>It was a logical assumption. If the spy Olivia were more experienced, she should know right away that  trusting him was the correct move. She could trust him because he was completely fucked and he needed her—a Chinese-looking person who could pass for a local—to help him.</p>
<p>Why then no trust?</p>
<p>Because he had crashed though her office window at a particularly difficult moment and aimed an assault rifle at her and then broken into her apartment, probably.</p>
<p>&ldquo;How did you get in here?&rdquo; she asked.</p>
<p>&ldquo;Plan D,&rdquo; he said in English.</p>
<p>&ldquo;And what is Plan D?&rdquo;</p>
<p>&ldquo;The fourth plan I attempted. It took me all afternoon.&rdquo;</p>
<p>He could have explained it, but it was idiotic to be discussing things in the past when they needed to discuss the future.</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption"><cite>Page 279–280</cite></div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;So those characters should get placed on some kind of watch list. Whenever they log in, we track them. Watch what they&rsquo;re doing. Check their IP addresses. Are they still in Xiamen? Or moving around? Do they have coconspirators in other places?&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption"><cite>Page 390</cite></div></div><p>Interesting. the police need a search warrant, but the proprietors do not. The data is not protected there. Your rights in meatspace do not transfer to cyberspace.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Well, until we can prove that there&rsquo;s no connection between them and Zula&rsquo;s disappearance, corporate policy has to change, &ldquo; Richard said.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption"><cite>Page 390</cite></div></div><p>Then corporate policy was always a whim, not a legal requirement, so it can be bent for personal reasons.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&rdquo;…and then sneak out and get to an MC without being ripped off,&ldquo; Richard concluded. In the back of his mind, he was worrying about how he was going to explain this to John—definitely not a T&rsquo;Rain kind of guy. &ldquo;Which could actually be difficult to pull off, if the Torgai falls under the control people who know what they&rsquo;re doing. I mean, with that kind of money at stake, there would be plenty of financial incentive to set up a heavy security cordon.&rdquo;</p>
<p>&ldquo;A Weirding Ward costs about one gold piece per linear meter,&rdquo; C-plus said, referring to a type of invisible force-field barrier that could be erected by sufficiently powerful sorcerers.</p>
<p>&ldquo;Cheaper if you harvest the Filamentous Cobwebs yourself,&rdquo; Richard retorted, referring to the primary ingredient needed to cast a Weirding Ward.</p>
<p>&ldquo;Not as easy as you make it sound, given that the Caves of Ut&rsquo;tharn just go placed under a Ban of Execration,&rdquo; countered Corvallis, referring, respectively, to the best place to gather Filamentous Cobwebs and a powerful priestly spell..</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption"><cite>Page 395</cite></div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The American national security apparatus is very large and unfathomably complex,&ldquo; was all that Uncle Meng would say. &ldquo; It has many departments and subunits that, one supposes, would not survive a top-to-bottom overhaul. This feeds on itself as individual actors, despairing of ever being able to make sense of it all, create their own little ad hoc bits that become institutionalized as money flows toward them. Those who are good at playing the political game are drawn inward to Washington. Those who are not end up sitting in hotel lobbies in places like Manila, waiting for people like you.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption"><cite>Page 449</cite></div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>He looked Olivia straight in the eye and said, in a mild but direct tone of voice, &ldquo;Do you want to fuck?&rdquo;</p>
<p>She must have looked a little surprised.</p>
<p>&ldquo;Sorry to be so blunt,&rdquo; he went on, &ldquo;but surviving one of these things always makes me incredibly horny. This, and going to funerals. Those are the triggers for me. So I just thought I would ask. I feel like I could rip off a great one just now. Tip-top. So I&rsquo;m just checking. Just on the off chance you might be in the mood for something, you know, totally hot and meaningless.&rdquo;</p>
<p>Olivia could well imagine it: the mischievous grin spreading across her lips, scampering back to the guest cabin, crowding into the shower, and getting banged senseless by this hormonally enraged man-child.</p>
<p>&ldquo;Um, I sor of am actually,&rdquo; Olivia said earnestly, &ldquo;but I think it&rsquo;s a temptation I can resist for now.&rdquo; Feeling that this required more explanation, she added, &ldquo;I was specifically told not to, actually.&rdquo;</p>
<p>He looked impressed. &ldquo;Really!&rdquo;</p>
<p>&ldquo;Yeah.&rdquo;</p>
<p>&ldquo;Someone actually bothered to issue you an order forbidding coitus with me.&rdquo;</p>
<p>&ldquo;Yeah. More I think directed at me and my reputation than yours.&rdquo;</p>
<p>He looked crestfallen.</p>
<p>&ldquo;But I&rsquo;m sure yours is amazing! Your reputation, that is.&rdquo;</p>
<p>[…]</p>
<p>&ldquo;We had to land some distance away and go in on foot and surprise them.&rdquo;</p>
<p>&ldquo;&lsquo;Surprise&rsquo; being, I guess, quite a mild term for how you approached these blokes.&rdquo;</p>
<p>&ldquo;It&rsquo;s an <em>incomplete</em> term. They were <em>definitely</em> surprised.&rdquo; Seamus had removed all the little screws he could find. He paused, looking at the laptop, still all together in one piece. &ldquo;Jones has been known to booby-trap these things and then leave them lying around,&rdquo; he said. &ldquo;But this one was not left lying around. It was being used when we entered the hut.&rdquo; He popped the back off. Olivia couldn&rsquo;t help flinching. But there were no lumps of plastique inside.</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption"><cite>Page 457</cite></div></div><p>Here Olivia discusses Abdullah Jones with Seamus.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>"For a man who doesn&rsquo;t want to die, he puts himself in some quite dodgy situations,&ldquo; she pointed out.</p>
<p>&ldquo;Oh, I think he&rsquo;s conflicted,&rdquo; Seamus said. &ldquo;Someday he&rsquo;s going to be a martyr. <em>Someday.</em> This is what he keeps telling himself. Then he looks around himself, at the wack jobs and goat fuckers he has to work with, and he sees how much more he has to offer the movement by staying alive. Putting his expertise to work, his languages, his ability to blend in. And so the day of martyrdom keeps getting postponed.&rdquo;</p>
<p>&ldquo;Convenient for him, that.&rdquo;</p>
<p>Seamus grinned and shrugged. &ldquo;I actually don&rsquo;t know whether the mani s a coward, or really trying to use his skills in the most productive way by staying alive.</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption"><cite>Page 457–458</cite></div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Huge geometric reshapings of mountainsides that she guessed must be mining projects. Canyons lined with marble the colors of honey and blood. Spindly steel-wheeled irrigation systems poised at the edge of barren cleared fields, like sprinters at the starting line, waiting for the season to being. Mountains marching in queues from directly overhead to the horizon, one after another, as if to say, <em>We have more where these came from.</em> Deciduous trees budding out on the mountains&rsquo; lower slopes, engulfing the lone dark spikes of conifers in a foaming, cresting wave of light green. Above that, the mountains&rsquo; upper slopes jumping asymptotically into curling cornices of fluffy white clouds, as opaque as cotton balls. Sometimes the clouds parted, giving glimpses of places higher up, the trees dusted as if the fog were condensing and freezing on them, just letting her know that they were only scurrying around on an insignificant low tier, and that above them were stacked many additional layers of greater complexity and structure and drama, both sunlit and weather lashed.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption"><cite>Page 463</cite></div></div><p>The description starts off quite strong, evoking recognition in those of us who have seen what he&rsquo;s describing and know it to be just as he describes. But, at around the sentence starting with the word &ldquo;Sometimes&rdquo;, you feel that he could just lay off already and go find an editor. We get it already. The mountains are impossibly big and remote. Brevity would be appreciated here and has been done better by other authors—I&rsquo;m thinking of Silverberg or Zelazny, who could also evoke that feeling of I-know-just-what-you&rsquo;re-describing but with far more concision.</p>
<p>Plus, weather-lashed has a hyphen.</p>
<p>Another example follows in this much shorter citation,</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The coastline was fractally scalloped, consisting of shallow bays, miles wide, themselves indented with smaller indentations.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption"><cite>Page 470</cite></div></div><p>This is just redundant. I don&rsquo;t know if the editor just gave up and didn&rsquo;t bother reading the book or if he or she was expressly forbidden from tossing this overly garrulous and pedantic style. It would have sung more as &ldquo;The coastline was miles of fractally scalloped bays.&rdquo;</p>
<p>Despite his occasional garrulousness, Stephenson is wonder storyteller. And he hides short stories in his books, each carefully crafted vignette worth all the dry patches. It&rsquo;s like Terry Gilliam said about good movies, that many of the great ones have only a few really good bits but those bits make the slog worth it. I&rsquo;ve found that a similar maxim applies to some books considered to be classics (I&rsquo;m looking at you, <em>The Brothers Karamazov</em>).</p>
<p>Here&rsquo;s part of a little story he included about how a hacker of computers can use his skills anywhere to learn and improve.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The Skipper had never been on a boat, other than passenger ferries, until the day the adventure had begun. Nonetheless he had, during the first critical forty-eight hours, acquired a command of basic sailing principles with a speed and fluency that had struck the Engineer as being almost supernatural. Much like a teenager who starts playing a new video game without bothering to open the manual, he tried things and observed the results, abandoning whatever didn&rsquo;t work and moving aggressively to exploit small successes. A profusion of ideas spewed forth from his mind. There was no such thing as a bad idea, apparently. But, perhaps more important, there was no such thing as a good idea either, until it had been tried and coolly evaluated. It was clear how he had become the leader of a sort of gang back home: not by asserting his leadership but by being so relentless in his production, evaluation, and exploitation of ideas that his friends had been left with no choice but to form up in his wake.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption"><cite>Page 470–471</cite></div></div><p>Of course, this only works to a certain local maximum in real life. A learning process like this allows one to quickly become skilled in something but will almost never lead to mastery. Starting off learning tried and true techniques from masters allows you to skip a lot of trial and error that otherwise wastes precious time. It will take you a lot longer to get where you&rsquo;re going on your own than on the shoulders of giants.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;She was, he realized, very beautiful, like a madonna in a church. When she was awake, her energy and the force of her personality shone through her face and made it difficult to know anything about what she really looked like, somewhat in the way that you couldn&rsquo;t see the glass envelope of a lightbulb when it was turned on.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption"><cite>Page 477</cite></div></div><p>A lovely simile but again overdoing it, no? How about &ldquo;what she really looked like, like the glass envelope of a lightbulb.&rdquo;</p>
<p>His style kind of whipsaws between run-on and confusing to concise and evocative. Stephenson would do well to learn something about sentence length from William Gibson or his editor.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Hilltops had been denuded of trees in some kind of draconian logging campaign and left covered with a khaki-colored pelt of low vegetation gashed with eroded gullies that had stained the formerly white beaches below them with shit-colored muck. A point came when they could no longer remember the last time they had been unable to see any buildings along the shore, and then they rounded a small headland, a beat-up prominence of brown rock shaped like a clenched fist, and came in view of a town of some size: a crescent-shaped beach, still several miles ahead of them, lined with buildings as much as eight stories high, which they gaped at as if they were lifelong jungle dwellers, and, nearer to hand, the usual agglomeration of smaller habitations and makeshift open-air markets along the waterfront, interrupted in the middle by a big pier reaching out into the sea and connected by hinged spans of diamond-tread stell to a facility on the short that was obviously a ferry terminal.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption"><cite>Page 484</cite></div></div><p>Phew. That was two sentences. The first one was three long clauses but it felt short next to the monster that followed it. Cervantes is blushing.</p>
<p>But then he manages to illustrate the culture clash between Csongor, who is Hungaria and Yuxia, Chinese, after he tells her of his three-person nuclear family who almost never see one another.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Yuxia seemed taken aback that any family could be so small and poorly organized.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption"><cite>Page 487</cite></div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;[…] an Afghan whom Zula had last seen perched on the top of the RV with a sniper rifle and a pair of binoculars. […] if ever there was a man cut out for a long trek down the length of a mountain range in hostile territory, it was Jahandar. To the point where Zula had some difficulty in imagining how they had smuggled him this deep into a Western democracy. They must have drugged him, packed him in to a crate, shipped him over by air freight direct from Tora BOra, and kept him pent up on a mountaintop until now. Everything about his appearance—the hat, the beard, the glare, the battle scars—should have got him arrested on sight in any municipality west of the Caspian Sea.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption"><cite>Page 514</cite></div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;She had just betrayed her own uncle. He was now in the power of men who would certainly kill him as soon as he was no longer useful.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption"><cite>Page 544</cite></div></div><p>Here Stephenson plays with interesting juxtapositions of a character&rsquo;s power (Richard&rsquo;s &ldquo;Egdod&rdquo; character) versus his relative powerlessness in a real-life situation. Marlon is similar in that he has a lot of power and money in T&rsquo;Rain but struggles to convert it to money and thus power in the real world. The currency of T&rsquo;Rain seems arbitrary but Stephenson uses it to shine a harsh light on the bizarreness that we accept in our own money exchanges. Are they even so different if we discard our predilection for the known quantity?</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;It would all work out fine if Sokolov could merely relate the story to the people Ivanov had betrayed.</p>
<p>&ldquo;Not that Sokolov had any certainty of being forgiven. There were no guarantees. But this way he had a decent chance. Whereas if he sneaked around and tried to avoid them, they would surely take not of his lack of courtesy and approach him in a more suspicious frame of mind.&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption"><cite>Page 552</cite></div></div><p>Stephenson is also pretty good a &ldquo;guy banter&rdquo;. Here we read how Seamus asked his friend Stan for help.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;Seamus asked Stan whether it wouldn&rsquo;t be too much of a challenge to his intellectual faculties to track down the provenance of a certain instant message, and wondered whether Stan was too much of a pussy to get it done discreetly, without setting the whole counterterrorism network alight.</p>
<p>&ldquo;[…]</p>
<p>&ldquo;Why yes, Seamus responded, if it wouldn&rsquo;t interrupt Stan&rsquo;s busy schedule of watching gay bondage pornography videos on the taxpayer-provided high-speed Internet connection, he would very much like to know whether a certain young lady had bought any airplane tickets of rented any cars in Washington or British Columbia of late.</p>
<p>&ldquo;A few minutes later came an email assuring Seamus that the lap dancer in question had indeed left an electronic trail a mile wide and that Seamus might be able to make use of the following data in tracking her down and getting his stolen kidney back: she had flown from Vancouver to Seattle this morning and rented a navy blue Chevy Trailblazer.</p>
<p>&ldquo;Seamus sent a polite note back reminding Stan to zip his fly when finished and promising to buy him a drink during Stan&rsquo;s next visit to Zamboanga, supposing that Stan had the testicular fortitude to come within a thousand miles of such a challenging locale.&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption"><cite>Page 571–572</cite></div></div><p>It&rsquo;s probably funnier in context, I guess. I liked it enough to highlight and can remember cackling at it when I was reading it but it&rsquo;s not as funny now. YMMV. You&rsquo;ll notice, however, that Stephenson&rsquo;s hatred of hyphens endures.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;In the middle of the gridiron was a man-sized door. This had clearly been locked and vandalized, chained and vandalized, welded shut and vandalized, so many times as to threaten the integrity of the entire structure. Now it stood slightly ajar and Zula&rsquo;s flashlight, shining through the grid, revealed that the graffiti and trash on its opposite side were only a little less prevalent.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption"><cite>Page 598–599</cite></div></div><p>I attached a note &ldquo;Moria&rdquo; to this citation, but am no longer sure what I was getting at.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;It was thirty miles as the crow flew, longer on the roads they&rsquo;d be taking. There were no buses, they could make it before nightfall if they set a decent pace. </p>
<p>&ldquo;Olivia now understood what Sokolov meant by <em>We are wasting time.</em> He was saying, <em>I could do this ride in two hours. With you, pumping away on your little girl-bike, it will take four.</em>&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption"><cite>Page 606</cite></div></div><p>Nope. Fifty probably sixty kilometers with hills on mountain bikes? With equipment on their backs? Even a machine like Sokolov isn&rsquo;t doing that in two hours. Stephenson usually does meticulous research, but this estimate is considerably off. A non-experienced cyclist wouldn&rsquo;t be able to hold a pace like that.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>"Two Chinese and a Hungarian, just basically parachuted into CONUS with no paperwork whatsoever.&ldquo;</p>
<p>The Hungarian is legit, he has a visa.&rdquo;</p>
<p>&ldquo;Two Chinese then.&rdquo;</p>
<p>&ldquo;Yeah.&rdquo;</p>
<p>&ldquo;Given that Chinese illegals are being shipped into the Port of Seattle by the containerload, it seems like it would hardly make a dent.</p>
<p>&ldquo;That&rsquo;s the spirit!&rdquo; Seamus had said. &ldquo;And these are not your baseline economic migrants. They&rsquo;re going to be running major corporations inside of a fortnight.&rdquo;</p>
<p>&ldquo;Not without green cards.&rdquo;</p>
<p>&ldquo;I think I&rsquo;m going to marry the girl. That would take care of her status.&rdquo;</p>
<p>Freddie had turned to look at him incredulously. &ldquo;Does <em>she</em> know this?&rdquo;</p>
<p>&ldquo;She has no idea. Just a feeling.&rdquo;</p>
<p>&ldquo;A feeling on <em>your</em> part.&rdquo;</p>
<p>&ldquo;Halfway there. Pretty respectable progress.&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption"><cite>Page 608</cite></div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;She found it odd that she was considered to be on a first-name basis with this family.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption"><cite>Page 622</cite></div></div><p>That makes her the shittiest spy ever because even the barest of research or familiarity with American culture would reveal that Americans are on a first-name basis with <em>everybody</em>. They act like last names don&rsquo;t even exist once you start talking to them.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;[…] by the time they had gone inside, sat down around the table, held hands to say Grace, and tucked into a simple but generous and nutritionally balanced dinner.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption"><cite>Page 645</cite></div></div><p>Who talks like that? Stephenson evinces a love of guns and possibly also preppers in this book. What is it with the prepper&rsquo;s obsession to prove that they are all dining so super-good away from civilization? The sentence jumped out at me as one I&rsquo;d read in a true prepper&rsquo;s book a few years back. It reminded me of that pedantic style that lovingly describes and counts up ammunition as well as provides mind-numbing detail about how food is prepared as if to prove that the author <em>knows how to feed himself when the shit goes down</em>. And don&rsquo;t you think he doesn&rsquo;t.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;She got to a point where she simply could not run anymore, so she permitted herself to drop into a brisk walk while she drank more water—[…]&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption"><cite>Page 652</cite></div></div><p>That point comes pretty quickly unless you&rsquo;re really well-trained, even if you&rsquo;re being chased by jihadis. And Zula had just spent weeks trapped in an RV with no mobility and poor nutrition. Plus, she&rsquo;s at altitude in the Canadian rockies and she lives in Seattle.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Inside Sokolov&rsquo;s pack was a smaller bag, just a thin nylon stuff sack, made to hold a wadded-up sleeping bag. Once Sokolov had found a convenient place to lie prone on the top of the rock, he pulled this out by its drawstring and set it down onthe rock. It clattered. It was full, she realized of hard heavy objects with corners. Once he had finished assembling the rifle, Sokolov zipped the bag&rsquo;s drawstring open and dumped it out on the rock. It contained half a dozen curved plastic boxes: ammunition clips for the rifle. From their weight it was obvious that they were loaded.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption"><cite>Page 661</cite></div></div><p>What the fuck is that? Is he trying to build suspense? Are we supposed to be seeing this through Zula&rsquo;s naive eyes? Oh, yeah, they&rsquo;re not naive eyes. Her whole family is into guns and she just spent weeks trapped in a trailer with jihadis. She knows what a fucking clip looks like. She is not surprised that Sokolov has a bunch of them. Neither are we.</p>
<p>This is just another example of frightfully overwording something that could have been done in just a couple of words. Where is Stephenson&rsquo;s editor? Are they being paid by the word? For example, &ldquo;Sokolov took up a prone position on the rock, dumping a bunch of clips out of a stuff sack near to hand.&rdquo;</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;All this effort, all these risks taken and damages sustained, had achieved one thing for him, which was that he had killed exactly one of his numerous foes.</p>
<p>&ldquo;Now, had he been a seventeen-year–old, he&rsquo;d have harbored foolish and unrealistic expectations of what could really be achieved in a situation such as this one, and he&rsquo;d have believed that the payoff for all that work and risk and pain ought to have been greater than bagging one enemy. Driven by that misconception, he would have been slower to abandon the log cabin, slower to give up on the hope of shooting the man who had hidden behind the outhouse. He would have adopted a combative stance toward the main group of jihadists who had come running back to the camp. As a result, they would have surrounded him and killed him. All because he was young and imbued with an unrealistic sense of what the world owed him.</p>
<p>&ldquo;On the other hand, had he been a few years older than he really was, or not in such good physical condition, then all the running and diving and exposure to the elements would have felt much more expensive to him. Unsustainable. Disheartening. And those emotions would have led to his making decisions every bit as fatal, in the end, as those of the hypothetical seventeen-year–old.</p>
<p>&ldquo;So, as loath as he was to be self-congratulatory, he saw evidence to support the conclusion that he was at precisely the rich age and level of physical conditioning to be undertaking this mission.</p>
<p>&ldquo;Which, viewed superficially, seemed like a favorable judgment. But with a bit more consideration—and, as he hid beneath the tree and listened to the jihadists beating the bushes, he did have a few minutes to think about it—it was really somewhat troubling, since it implied that all the operations he had participated in during his career before today had been undertaken by a foolish boy, in over his head and surviving by dumb luck. Whereas any operations he might carry out in the future would be ill-advised excursions by a man who was over the hill, past his prime.</p>
<p>&ldquo;He really needed to get out of this line of work.&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption"><cite>Page 692</cite></div></div><p>On the one hand, this is neatly philosophical and thoughtful section but on the other it smacks of the same obsessive pedantry that makes Stephenson describe food and ammunition in such excruciating detail. Again, a lovely thought, a lovely idea conjured up by an introspective soldier of uncommon skill, but formulated in an overwrought, almost clinical way.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;This was a <em>shoot-out</em>. Nothing could be simpler. But he was making it too complicated by trying to use his wits to work the angles, figure out some clever way to doge around the essential nature of what was happening, to get through to the other side without getting hurt. His opponent, of course, simply didn&rsquo;t give a shat what happened to him and was probably a dead man anyway—which gave Jones an advantage that Richard could match [1] only by adopting the same attitude. It was an attitude that had come naturally to him as a young man, taking down the grizzly bear with the slug gun and doing any number of other things that later seemed ill-advised. Wealth and success had changed him; he now looked back on all such adventures with fastidious horror. But he had to revert to that mind-set now or else Jones would simply kill him.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption"><cite>Page 711</cite></div></div><div class="footnote-reference"><span id="footnote_DRAFTABLE_ENTRY_2949_1_body" class="footnote-number">[1]</span> An advantage is not <em>matched</em> but rather <em>neutralized</em>.</div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;They were greeted with the sight of Sokolov, dressed in a bathrobe, drinking a cup of coffee and reading a book through a pair of half-glasses that made him seem oddly professor-like. This elicited a cheer from the group in Iowa. He lifted up his coffee mug and tipped it toward them, then took a sip.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption"><cite>Page 714</cite></div></div><p>This is a pretty cheesy thing to do to a character like Sokolov, giving him the Bruckheimer/Bay treatment.</p>
<h2>Errata</h2><pre class=" ">Page 147:
  Will it last? Because they had making money before, when the story of the world had actually made sense.
    Add “been” between “had” and “making”; they had [been] making money before

Page 173:
  And even though he did not play the game himself, professing to find the very ideal “frightful”
    Change “ideal” to “idea”; professing to find the very [idea] “frightful”

Page 326:
  glad of an opportunity to lie down and stop moving, even if she were wet and cold.
    Change “were” to “was”; even if she [was] wet and cold.

Page 504:
  So the main thrust of the investigation, as far you’re concerned, is the SNAG,
    Add “as” after “far”; as far [as] you’re concerned

Page 590:
  He was movingly awkwardly because of the Crocs
    Replace “movingly” with “moving”; he was [moving] awkwardly

Page 646:
  They only way to get past it was this arduous traversal
    Replace “They” with “The”; [The] only way to get past it was

Page 697:
  apparently he head heard John’s clothes rustling
    Replace “head” with “had”; apparently he [had] heard</pre>      </div>
      </div>
        <div class="footer">
    <div class="footer-data"><div class="footer-links"><ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/contact.php" title="">Contact</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/support.php" title="">Support</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/privacy.php" title="">Privacy</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/rights.php" title="">Rights</a></li></ul></div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="copyright">Copyright (c) 1999-2026 earthli.com. All Rights Reserved.</div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="versions">Powered by <ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore/app_news.php">earthli News 3.7</a></li><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore" title="">earthli WebCore&trade; 3.7</a></li></ul></div></div>    </div>
      </div>
  </div>  </body>
</html>
]]>
  </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
      <title type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[The Name of the Rose by Umberto Eco (read in 2014)]]>
  </title>
    <id>https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3046</id>
    <link href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3046"/>
    <updated>2015-03-29T18:15:35+02:00</updated>
    <author>
        <name type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[(withheld)]]>
  </name>
    </author>
      <summary type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<blockquote class="quote abstract "><div>Disclaimer: these are notes I took while reading this book. They include citations I found interesting or enlightening or particularly well-written. In some cases, I&rsquo;ve pointed out which of these applies to which citation; in others, I have not. Any benefit you gain from reading these notes is... [<a class="complete-text-link" href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3046">More</a>]</div></blockquote>]]>
  </summary>
      <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<html lang="en">
  <head>
    <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/themes/ice.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/fonts/raleway.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/core/medium.css">
  </head>
  <body>
<div class="style-controls">  <div class="page">
    <div class="page-body">
<div class="info-box-top">
<p>
Published by <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_user.php?name=root" title="(withheld)" class="visible">root</a> on <span class="date-time">29. Mar 2015 18:15:35 (GMT-5)</span>
</p>
<p>
Updated by <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_user.php?name=root" title="(withheld)" class="visible">root</a> on <span class="date-time">29. Mar 2015 18:15:46 (GMT-5)</span>
</p>
</div>
      <div class="text-flow wide">
  <blockquote class="quote abstract "><div>Disclaimer: these are notes I took while reading this book. They include citations I found interesting or enlightening or particularly well-written. In some cases, I&rsquo;ve pointed out which of these applies to which citation; in others, I have not. Any benefit you gain from reading these notes is purely incidental to the purpose they serve of reminding me what I once read. Please see Wikipedia for a summary if I&rsquo;ve failed to provide one sufficient for your purposes. If my notes serve to trigger an interest in this book, then I&rsquo;m happy for you.</div></blockquote><h2>Citations</h2><p>Eco&rsquo;s research is legendary, if you can get past the pomposity,</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;[…] but then, in 1970, in Buenos Aires, as I was browsing among the shelves of a little antiquarian bookseller on Corrientes, not far from the more illustrious Patio del Tango of that great street, I cam upon the Castilian version of a little work by Milo Temesvar, <em>On the Use of Mirrors in the Game of Chess</em>. It was an Italian translation of the original, which, now impossible to find, was in Georgian (Tbilisi, 1934) […]&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption"><cite>Page 11-12</cite></div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Excluded as they were from the flock, all of them were ready to hear, or to produce, every sermon that, harking back to the word of Christ, would condemn the behavior of the dogs and the shepherds and would promise punishment one day. The powerful always realized this. The recovery of the outcasts demanded reduction of the privileges of the powerful, so the excluded who became aware of their exclusion had to be branded as heretics, whatever their doctrine. And for their part, blinded by their exclusion, they were not really interested in any doctrine. This is the illusion of heresy. Everyone is heretical, everyone is orthodox. The faith a movement proclaims doesn&rsquo;t count: what counts is the hope it offers. All heresies are the banner of a reality, an exclusion. Scratch the heresy and you will find the leper. Every battle against heresy wants only this: to keep the leper as he is.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption"><cite>Page 202–203</cite></div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The science Bacon spoke of rests unquestionably on these propositions. You understand, Adso, I must believe that my proposition works, because I learned it by experience; but to believe it I must assume there are universal laws. Yet I cannot speak of them, because the very concept that universal laws and an established order exist would imply that God is their prisoner, whereas God is something absolutely free, so that if He wanted, with a single act of His will He could make the world different.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption"><cite>Page 206–207</cite></div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>[…] Because the girl didn&rsquo;t go with him for love, but for a pack of scraps. Certainly she is a girl from the village who, perhaps not for the first time, grants her favors to some lustful monk out of hunger and receives as recompense something for her and her family to eat.&ldquo;</p>
<p>&ldquo;A harlot!&rdquo; I said, horrified.</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption"><cite>Page 250–251</cite></div></div><p>Eco shows how quick the monks are to blame the woman, although she is clearly the party of whom advantage was taken.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;I arrived at Jorge pursuing the plan of a perverse and rational mind, and there was no plan, or, rather, Jorge himself was overcome by his own initial design and there began a sequence of causes, and concauses, and of cause contradicting one another, which proceeded on their own, creating relations that did not stem from any plan. Where is all my wisdom, then? I behaved stubbornly, pursuing a semblance of order, when I should have known well that there is no order in the universe.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption"><cite>Page 483–484</cite></div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;What you say is very fine, Adso, and I thank you.The order that our mind imagines is like a net, or like a ladder, built to attain something. But afterward you must throw the ladder away, because you discover that, even if it was useful, it was meaningless. Er muoz gelichesame die leieter abewerfen, so er an ir ufgestigen…. Is that how you say it?</p>
<p>&ldquo;[…]</p>
<p>&ldquo;I dared, for the first and last time in my life, to express a theological conclusion: &ldquo;But how can a necessary begin exist totally polluted with the possible? What difference is there, then, between God and primigenial chaos? Isn&rsquo;t affirming God&rsquo;s absolute omnipotence and His absolute freedom with regard to His own choices tantamount to demonstrating that God does not exist?&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption"><cite>Page 484</cite></div></div>      </div>
      </div>
        <div class="footer">
    <div class="footer-data"><div class="footer-links"><ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/contact.php" title="">Contact</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/support.php" title="">Support</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/privacy.php" title="">Privacy</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/rights.php" title="">Rights</a></li></ul></div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="copyright">Copyright (c) 1999-2026 earthli.com. All Rights Reserved.</div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="versions">Powered by <ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore/app_news.php">earthli News 3.7</a></li><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore" title="">earthli WebCore&trade; 3.7</a></li></ul></div></div>    </div>
      </div>
  </div>  </body>
</html>
]]>
  </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
      <title type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[Don Quixote by Miguel de Cervantes (read in 2014--2015)]]>
  </title>
    <id>https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3035</id>
    <link href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3035"/>
    <updated>2015-03-29T17:56:16+02:00</updated>
    <author>
        <name type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[Marco von Ballmoos]]>
  </name>
      <uri>https://earthli.com/users/marco</uri>
    </author>
      <summary type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<blockquote class="quote abstract "><div>Disclaimer: these are notes I took while reading this book. They include citations I found interesting or enlightening or particularly well-written. In some cases, I&rsquo;ve pointed out which of these applies to which citation; in others, I have not. Any benefit you gain from reading these notes is... [<a class="complete-text-link" href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=3035">More</a>]</div></blockquote>]]>
  </summary>
      <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<html lang="en">
  <head>
    <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/themes/ice.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/fonts/raleway.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/core/medium.css">
  </head>
  <body>
<div class="style-controls">  <div class="page">
    <div class="page-body">
<div class="info-box-top">
<p>
Published by <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_user.php?name=root" title="(withheld)" class="visible">root</a> on <span class="date-time">29. Mar 2015 17:56:16 (GMT-5)</span>
</p>
<p>
Updated by <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_user.php?name=marco" title="Marco von Ballmoos" class="visible">marco</a> on <span class="date-time">23. May 2015 12:14:44 (GMT-5)</span>
</p>
</div>
      <div class="text-flow wide">
  <blockquote class="quote abstract "><div>Disclaimer: these are notes I took while reading this book. They include citations I found interesting or enlightening or particularly well-written. In some cases, I&rsquo;ve pointed out which of these applies to which citation; in others, I have not. Any benefit you gain from reading these notes is purely incidental to the purpose they serve of reminding me what I once read. Please see Wikipedia for a summary if I&rsquo;ve failed to provide one sufficient for your purposes. If my notes serve to trigger an interest in this book, then I&rsquo;m happy for you.</div></blockquote><h2>Citations</h2><p>Cervantes starts off with a swipe at the <em>apologia</em>, a standard practice at the time in which the author excused himself for wasting the time of the reader with his drivel. It was generally an affair with two meanings, but seldom honest. Here is that for Don Quixote:</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;For, how could you expect me not to feel uneasy about what that ancient lawgiver they call the Public will say when it sees me, after slumbering so many years in the silence of oblivion, coming out now with all my years upon my back, and with a book as dry as a rush, devoid of invention, meagre in style, poor in thoughts, wholly wanting in learning and wisdom, without quotations in the margin or annotations at the end, after the fashion of other books I see, which, though all fables and profanity, are so full of maxims from Aristotle, and Plato, and the whole herd of philosophers, that they fill the readers with amazement and convince them that the authors are men of learning, erudition, and eloquence. And then, when they quote the Holy Scriptures!—anyone would say they are St. Thomases or other doctors of the Church, observing as they do a decorum so ingenious that in one sentence they describe a distracted lover and in the next deliver a devout little sermon that it is a pleasure and a treat to hear and read. Of all this there will be nothing in my book, for “I have nothing to quote in the margin or to note at the end, and still less do I know what authors I follow in it, to place them at the beginning, as all do, under the letters A, B, C, beginning with Aristotle and ending with Xenophon, or Zoilus, or Zeuxis, though one was a slanderer and the other a painter. Also my book must do without sonnets at the beginning, at least sonnets whose authors are dukes, marquises, counts, bishops, ladies, or famous poets. Though if I were to ask two or three obliging friends, I know they would give me them, and such as the productions of those that have the highest reputation in our Spain could not equal.</p>
<p>&ldquo;In short, my friend,&ldquo; I continued, &ldquo;I am determined that Senor Don Quixote shall remain buried in the archives of his own La Mancha until Heaven provide some one to garnish him with all those things he stands in need of; because I find myself, through my shallowness and want of learning, unequal to supplying them, and because I am by nature shy and careless about hunting for authors to say what I myself can say without them. Hence the cogitation and abstraction you found me in, and reason enough, what you have heard from me.&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption"><cite>Page 47-48</cite></div></div><p>Soon after, Cervantes pokes at how the utterly mundane is transformed into the etherial by historians,</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Thus setting out, our new-fledged adventurer paced along, talking to himself and saying, &ldquo;Who knows but that in time to come, when the veracious history of my famous deeds is made known, the sage who writes it, when he has to set forth my first sally in the early morning, will do it after this fashion? &lsquo;Scarce had the rubicund Apollo spread o&rsquo;er the face of the broad spacious earth the golden threads of his bright hair, scarce had the little birds of painted plumage attuned their notes to hail with dulcet and mellifluous harmony the coming of the rosy Dawn, that, deserting the soft couch of her jealous spouse, was appearing to mortals at the gates and balconies of the Manchegan horizon, when the renowned knight Don Quixote of La Mancha, quitting the lazy down, mounted his celebrated steed Rocinante and began to traverse the ancient and famous Campo de Montiel;&lsquo;&rdquo; which in fact he was actually traversing. &ldquo;Happy the age, happy the time,&rdquo; he continued, &ldquo;in which shall be made known my deeds of fame, worthy to be moulded in brass, carved in marble, limned in pictures, for a memorial for ever. “And thou, O sage magician, whoever thou art, to whom it shall fall to be the chronicler of this wondrous history, forget not, I entreat thee, my good Rocinante, the constant companion of my ways and wanderings.&rdquo; Presently he broke out again, as if he were love-stricken in earnest, &ldquo;O Princess Dulcinea, lady of this captive heart, a grievous wrong hast thou done me to drive me forth with scorn, and with inexorable obduracy banish me from the presence of thy beauty. O lady, deign to hold in remembrance this heart, thy vassal, that thus in anguish pines for love of thee.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption"><cite>Page 58</cite></div></div><p>This next quote plumbs the depths of Quixote&rsquo;s derangement, with his quite honest belief that a potion that he learned how to mix from one of his books on chivalry will allow him to be pasted back together like a cartoon character.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;What vial and what balsam is that?&rdquo; said Sancho Panza.</p>
<p>&ldquo;&ldquo;It is a balsam,&rdquo; answered Don Quixote, &ldquo;the receipt of which I have in my memory, with which one need have no fear of death, or dread dying of any wound; and so when I make it and give it to thee thou hast nothing to do when in some battle thou seest they have cut me in half through the middle of the body—as is wont to happen frequently,—but neatly and with great nicety, ere the blood congeal, to place that portion of the body which shall have fallen to the ground upon the other half which remains in the saddle, taking care to fit it on evenly and exactly. Then thou shalt give me to drink but two drops of the balsam I have mentioned, and thou shalt see me become sounder than an apple. &rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption"><cite>Page 102</cite></div></div><p>This next citation reminds me very much of Mark Twain, who had a very similarly sarcastic style.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Don Quixote&rsquo;s [bed] consisted simply of four rough boards on two not very even trestles, a mattress, that for thinness might have passed for a quilt, full of pellets which, were they not seen through the rents to be wool, would to the touch have seemed pebbles in hardness, two sheets made of buckler leather, and a coverlet the threads of which anyone that chose might have counted without missing one in the reckoning.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption"><cite>Page 288–289</cite></div></div><p>And here we have a description of a woman foiling an attack from one man while describing how she was unable to foil a similar attack at a later date.</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;[…] my worthy servant, until then so faithful and trusty when he found me in this lonely spot, moved more by his own villainy than by my beauty, sought to take advantage of the opportunity which these solitudes seemed to present him, and with little shame and less fear of God and respect for me, began to make overtures to me; and finding that I replied to the effrontery of his proposals with justly severe language, he laid aside the entreaties which he had employed at first, and began to use violence.</p>
<p>&ldquo;But just Heaven, that seldom fails to watch over and aid good intentions, so aided mine that with my slight strength and with little exertion I pushed him over a precipice, where I left him, whether dead or alive I know not […]</p>
<p>&ldquo;I met a herdsman who engaged me as his servant at a place in the heart of this Sierra, and all this time I have been serving him as herd, striving to keep always afield to hide these locks which have now unexpectedly betrayed me. But all my care and pains were unavailing, for my master made the discovery that I was not a man, and harboured the same base designs as my servant; and as fortune does not always supply a remedy in cases of difficulty, and I had no precipice or ravine at hand down which to fling the master and cure his passion, as I had in the servant&rsquo;s case, I thought it a lesser evil to leave him and again conceal myself among these crags, than make trial of my strength and argument with him.&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;&ldquo;But what most of all made me hold my hand and even abandon all idea of finishing it was an argument I put to myself taken from the plays that are acted now-a-days, which was in this wise: if those that are now in vogue, as well those that are pure invention as those founded on history, are, all or most of them, downright nonsense and things that have neither head nor tail, and yet the public listens to them with delight, and regards and cries them up as perfection when they are so far from it; and if the authors who write them, and the players who act them, say that this is what they must be, for the public wants this and will have nothing else; and that those that go by rule and work out a plot according to the laws of art will only find some half-dozen intelligent people to understand them, while all the rest remain blind to the merit of their composition; and that for themselves it is better to get bread from the many than praise from the few; then my book will fare the same way […]&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Pos. 7340</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;For myself, I can only say that when I read them, so long as I do not stop to think that they are all lies and frivolity, they give me a certain amount of pleasure; but when I come to consider what they are, I fling the very best of them at the wall, and would fling it into the fire if there were one at hand, as richly deserving such punishment as cheats and impostors out of the range of ordinary toleration, and as founders of new sects and modes of life, and teachers that lead the ignorant public to believe and accept as truth all the folly they contain.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Pos. 7484</div></div><p>Here we see Cervantes&rsquo;s hatred for this kind of pap.</p>
<p>Part II of the book starts with a discussion of the first part of the book, which in this second part has appeared as a publication already famous throughout Spain. Don Quixote and Sancho Panza discuss this book with a bachelor who is very familiar with it, questioning and probing to determine that it reflects the truth…but not too much of the truth. This part is really very nicely written and the self-referential part as well as the oblique chastisement of Cervantes&rsquo;s own detractors and critics is quite a master stroke. [1]</p>
<p>Cervantes packs this long book full of wonderful prose, never missing an opportunity for a small joke or pithy phrase (much as Sancho never misses an opportunity to utter a proverb). So many paragraphs are like exquisite sculptures, standing nearly on their own, and the careful reader is constantly rewarded, as in the emphasized part below.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;[…] Let each look to himself and not try to make out white black, and black white; for each of us is as God made him, aye, <em>and often worse.</em> (Emphasis added.)&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">&mdash;<cite>Sancho Panza</cite> (<cite>Pos. 8383</cite>)</div></div><p>Or in this next citation, again from Panza, about how those least in need of it have money thrown at them,</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;As soon as I have the government,&rdquo; said Sancho, &ldquo;I will send for him by post, and I will send thee money, of which I shall have no lack, for there is never any want of people to lend it to governors when they have not got it; […]&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">&mdash;<cite>Sancho Panza</cite> (<cite>Pos. 8523-8524</cite>)</div></div><p>Or this one, again by Sancho, which appear to be a nicety but is a backhanded compliment if I&rsquo;ve ever read one. The sting is in the tail. The books are positively filled with this type of sly backhandedness.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;My lady the duchess kisses thy hands a thousand times; do thou make a return with two thousand, for as my master says, <em>nothing costs less or is cheaper than civility.</em> (Emphasis added.)&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">&mdash;<cite>Sancho Panza</cite> (<cite>Pos. 11812</cite>)</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;And thou, highest perfection of excellence that can be desired, utmost limit of grace in human shape, sole relief of this afflicted heart that adores thee, though the malign enchanter that persecutes me has brought clouds and cataracts on my eyes, and to them, and them only, transformed thy unparagoned beauty and changed thy features into those of a poor peasant girl, if so be he has not at the same time changed mine into those of some monster to render them loathsome in thy sight, refuse not to look upon me with tenderness and love; seeing in this submission that I make on my knees to thy transformed beauty the humility with which my soul adores thee.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">&mdash;<cite>Don Quixote</cite> (<cite>Pos. 8967–8971</cite>)</div></div><p>Sancho lied about Dulcinea, covering up his subterfuge by claiming that Quixote could only see an ugly peasant girl because of <em>enchantments</em>. And here Sancho Panza doubles down on his lie about Dulcinea, showing what a brilliant, confident and, above all, <em>unabashed</em> liar he is,</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;[…] and <em>if it be that it is only from your worship she is hidden</em>, the misfortune will be more yours than hers; but so long as the lady Dulcinea is well and happy, we on our part will make the best of it, and get on as well as we can, seeking our adventures, and leaving Time to take his own course; for he is the best physician for these and greater ailments.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">&mdash;<cite>Sancho Panza</cite> (<cite>Pos. 9032–9034</cite>)</div></div><p>And Dulcinea&rsquo;s non-existence in no way prevents Quixote from lamenting the loss of her fictitious honor through his own inability to resist the bought-and-paid-for wiles of a few young damsels hired by the duke and duchess to prolong their prank. Here Quixote is disconsolate because he will be unable to resist the temptations of virgins and will therefore sully the pure love he has for a woman he has never met nor knows. He weeps for her lost honor, the status of which is not only entirely fictitious but also would be well within his power to preserve.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;O that I should be such an unlucky knight that no damsel can set eyes on me but falls in love with me! O that the peerless Dulcinea should be so unfortunate that they cannot let her enjoy my incomparable constancy in peace! What would ye with her, ye queens? Why do ye persecute her, ye empresses? Why ye pursue her, ye virgins of from fourteen to fifteen?&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">&mdash;<cite>Don Quixote</cite> (<cite>Pos. 12536-12538</cite>)</div></div><p>The exactness of his dialogue is a pleasure:</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Thirty thousand volumes of my history have been printed, and it is on the high-road to be printed thirty thousand thousands of times, if heaven does not put a stop to it. In short, to sum up all in a few words, or in a single one, I may tell you I am Don Quixote of La Mancha, otherwise called &lsquo;The Knight of the Rueful Countenance;&rsquo; for though self-praise is degrading, I must perforce sound my own sometimes, that is to say, when there is no one at hand to do it for me. So that, gentle sir, neither this horse, nor this lance, nor this shield, nor this squire, nor all these arms put together, nor the sallowness of my countenance, nor my gaunt leanness, will henceforth astonish you, now that you know who I am and what profession I follow.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">&mdash;<cite>Don Quixote</cite> (<cite>Pos. 9521–9526</cite>)</div></div><p>And here:</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;[…] there is no mode of life more restless or anxious than ours. What led me into it was a certain thirst for vengeance, which is strong enough to disturb the quietest hearts. I am by nature tender-hearted and kindly, but, as I said, the desire to revenge myself for a wrong that was done me so overturns all my better impulses that I keep on in this way of life in spite of what conscience tells me; and as one depth calls to another, and one sin to another sin, revenges have linked themselves together, and I have taken upon myself not only my own but those of others: it pleases God, however, that, though I see myself in this maze of entanglements, I do not lose all hope of escaping from it and reaching a safe port.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">&mdash;<cite>Don Quixote</cite> (<cite>Pos. 14297–14302</cite>)</div></div><p>Quixote holds forth on the validity of various scholastics and poetry:</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;But your son, senor, I suspect, is not prejudiced against Spanish poetry, but against those poets who are mere Spanish verse writers, without any knowledge of other languages or sciences to adorn and give life and vigour to their natural inspiration; and yet even in this he may be wrong; for, according to a true belief, a poet is born one;&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">&mdash;<cite>Don Quixote</cite> (<cite>Pos. 9586–9589</cite>)</div></div><p>When Quixote confronts lions and demands to fight them, the gentleman in charge of them chides him with,</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;[…] valour that trenches upon temerity savours rather of madness than of courage;&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption"><cite>Pos. 9652</cite></div></div><p>At another point, Quixote himself holds forth on discretion being the better part of valor (Douglas Adams took it further, writing that <span class="quote-inline">&ldquo;[…] cowardice is the better part of discretion, [and Zaphod] valiantly hid himself in a closet&rdquo;</span>).</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;He does not fly who retires,&rdquo; returned Don Quixote; &ldquo;for I would have thee know, Sancho, that the valour which is not based upon a foundation of prudence is called rashness, and the exploits of the rash man are to be attributed rather to good fortune than to courage; and so I own that I retired, but not that I fled; and therein I have followed the example of many valiant men who have reserved themselves for better times;&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption"><cite>Pos. 10922–10925</cite></div></div><p>And here we have yet more evidence that part two of this book is a clever story of the telling of the translation of the telling of the story of Don Quixote.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Here the author&rsquo;s outburst came to an end, and he proceeded to take up the thread of his story, saying that the keeper, seeing that Don Quixote had taken up his position, and that it was impossible for him to avoid letting out the male without incurring the enmity of the fiery and daring knight, flung open the doors of the first cage, containing, as has been said, the lion, which was now seen to be of enormous size, and grim and hideous mien.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption"><cite>Pos. 9690–9691</cite></div></div><p>The reader is eased back in from the supposedly high-flung and needlessly hyperbolic prose of the original author to the at least somewhat more staid and descriptive and sensible prose of the current translator.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;I, then, as it has fallen to my lot to be a member of knight-errantry, cannot avoid attempting all that to me seems to come within the sphere of my duties; thus it was my bounden duty to attack those lions that I just now attacked, although I knew it to be the height of rashness; for I know well what valour is, that it is a virtue that occupies a place between two vicious extremes, cowardice and temerity; but it will be a lesser evil for him who is valiant to rise till he reaches the point of rashness, than to sink until he reaches the point of cowardice; for, as it is easier for the prodigal than for the miser to become generous, so it is easier for a rash man to prove truly valiant than for a coward to rise to true valour; and believe me, Senor Don Diego, in attempting adventures it is better to lose by a card too many than by a card too few; for to hear it said, &lsquo;such a knight is rash and daring,&rsquo; sounds better than &lsquo;such a knight is timid and cowardly.&rsquo;&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">&mdash;<cite>Don Quixote</cite> (<cite>Pos. 9748–9752</cite>)</div></div><p>And in this much longer passage, the author writes how the original Moorish author lamented at having to write such a boring story, a form of <em>apologia</em> but with ironic tongue firmly in cheek.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;It is stated, they say, in the true original of this history, that when Cide Hamete came to write this chapter, his interpreter did not translate it as he wrote it—that is, as a kind of complaint the Moor made against himself for having taken in hand a story so dry and of so little variety as this of Don Quixote, for he found himself forced to speak perpetually of him and Sancho, without venturing to indulge in digressions and episodes more serious and more interesting. He said, too, that to go on, mind, hand, pen always restricted to writing upon one single subject, and speaking through the mouths of a few characters, was intolerable drudgery, the result of which was never equal to the author&rsquo;s labour, and that to avoid this he had in the First Part availed himself of the device of novels, like &ldquo;The Ill-advised Curiosity,&rdquo; and &ldquo;The Captive Captain,&rdquo; which stand, as it were, apart from the story; the others are given there being incidents which occurred to Don Quixote himself and could not be omitted. He also thought, he says, that many, engrossed by the interest attaching to the exploits of Don Quixote, would take none in the novels, and pass them over hastily or impatiently without noticing the elegance and art of their composition, which would be very manifest were they published by themselves and not as mere adjuncts to the crazes of Don Quixote or the simplicities of Sancho.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption"><cite>Pos. 12415–12423</cite></div></div><p>Again, much later in the book, we meet Roque, who is so polite and good-looking that people are almost pleased to be robbed by him, thanking him for whatever small courtesy he offers:</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Profuse and hearty were the expressions of gratitude with which the captains thanked Roque for his courtesy and generosity; for such they regarded his leaving them their own money. Senora Dona Guiomar de Quinones wanted to throw herself out of the coach to kiss the feet and hands of the great Roque, but he would not suffer it on any account; so far from that, he begged her pardon for the wrong he had done her under pressure of the inexorable necessities of his unfortunate calling.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption"><cite>Pos. 14329–14333</cite></div></div><p>Here is an example of Don Quixote&rsquo;s frustration with Sancho&rsquo;s seemingly inadvertent but at-times seemingly deliberate misuse of words.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;What art thou driving at, Sancho? curses on thee!&rdquo; said Don Quixote; &ldquo;for when thou takest to stringing proverbs and sayings together, no one can understand thee but Judas himself, and I wish he had thee. Tell me, thou animal, what dost thou know about nails or wheels, or anything else?&rdquo; &ldquo;Oh, if you don&rsquo;t understand me,&rdquo; replied Sancho, &ldquo;it is no wonder my words are taken for nonsense; but no matter; I understand myself, and I know I have not said anything very foolish in what I have said; only your worship, senor, is always gravelling at everything I say, nay, everything I do.&rdquo; &ldquo;Cavilling, not gravelling,&rdquo; said Don Quixote, &ldquo;thou prevaricator of honest language, God confound thee!&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">&mdash;<cite>Don Quixote</cite> (<cite>Pos. 9937–9941</cite>)</div></div><p>This misuse of words, especially those a bit off the beaten path, is common among people today as well. With an ear more attuned to it, I&rsquo;ve recently heard someone use &ldquo;diligent&rdquo; when they meant &ldquo;vigilant&rdquo; or &ldquo;colonoscopy bag&rdquo; instead of &ldquo;colostomy bag&rdquo;.</p>
<p>Don Quixote has a bit of a love/hate relationship with Sancho, as evidenced by this next citation. Note the emphasis.</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;God guide thee, Sancho, and govern thee in thy government, and deliver me from the misgiving I have that thou wilt turn the whole island upside down, a thing I might easily prevent by explaining to the duke what thou art and telling him that all that <em>fat little person of thine is nothing else but a sack full of proverbs and sauciness.</em> (Emphasis added.)&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>And here Sancho expresses his doubt at the gravity of Basilio&rsquo;s condition,</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;For one so badly wounded,&ldquo; observed Sancho at this point, &ldquo;this young man has a great deal to say; they should make him leave off billing and cooing, and attend to his soul; for to my thinking he has it more on his tongue than at his teeth.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">&mdash;<cite>Sancho Panza</cite> (<cite>Pos. 10171–10172</cite>)</div></div><p>And here is a typically long, though lovely formulation of a now-common proverb &ldquo;all is fair in love and war&rdquo;.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;[…] right to take vengeance for wrongs that love may do to us: remember love and war are the same thing, and as in war it is allowable and common to make use of wiles and stratagems to overcome the enemy, so in the contests and rivalries of love the tricks and devices employed to attain the desired end are justifiable, provided they be not to the discredit or dishonour of the loved object.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption"><cite>Pos. 10185–10188</cite></div></div><p>This next part is delivered by Don Quixote later, when Sancho is about to become a governor and is in dire need of guidance in his personal hygiene. It translates, roughly, to &ldquo;long nails is nasty.&rdquo;</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;"With regard to the mode in which thou shouldst govern thy person and thy house, Sancho, the first charge I have to give thee is to be clean, and to cut thy nails, not letting them grow as some do, whose ignorance makes them fancy that long nails are an ornament to their hands, as if those excrescences they neglect to cut were nails, and not the talons of a lizard-catching kestrel—a filthy and unnatural abuse.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">&mdash;<cite>Don Quixote</cite> (<cite>Pos. 12333—12336</cite>)</div></div><p>Or this quote of Don Quixote, who in this case—and many others, throughout the book—epitomizes the know-it-all who has read much but experienced nothing. Here he is acknowledging this but plowing on nonetheless, as he is about to expound at length on marriage, because the world should not be deprived of wisdom such as his,</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;[…] myself am not married, nor, so far, has it ever entered my thoughts to be so; nevertheless I would venture to give advice to anyone who might ask it, as to the mode in which he should seek a wife such as he would be content to marry. […] If you take a good woman into your house it will be an easy matter to keep her good, and even to make her still better; but if you take a bad one you will find it hard work to mend her, for it is no very easy matter to pass from one extreme to another. I do not say it is impossible, but I look upon it as difficult.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">&mdash;<cite>Don Quixote</cite> (<cite>Pos. 10222–10224</cite>)</div></div><p>And here we meet another man on the road, one who is arguably worse than Quixote or Panza in his locution: a man who shows all signs of being the precursor or sixteenth-century equivalent of the online, conspiracy-theorist know-it-all.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Another book I have which I call &lsquo;The Supplement to Polydore Vergil,&rsquo; which treats of the invention of things, and is a work of great erudition and research, for I establish and elucidate elegantly some things of great importance which Polydore omitted to mention. He forgot to tell us who was the first man in the world that had a cold in his head, and who was the first to try salivation for the French disease, but I give it accurately set forth, and quote more than five-and-twenty authors in proof of it, so you may perceive I have laboured to good purpose and that the book will be of service to the whole world.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption"><cite>10255–10256</cite></div></div><p>The sarcasm of the author shines through thickly nearly everywhere, as evidenced in the emphasized bit in the following citation.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Thou hast said more than thou art aware of, Sancho,&ldquo; said Don Quixote; &ldquo;for there are some who weary themselves out in learning and proving things that, after they are known and proved, are not worth a farthing to the understanding or memory.&rdquo; <em>In this and other pleasant conversation the day went by</em>, […](Emphasis added.)&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">&mdash;<cite>Don Quixote</cite> (<cite>Pos. 10270–10272</cite>)</div></div><p>Or in this (emphasized) comment by Sancho Panza, responding to the guide&rsquo;s request that Quixote be on the lookout for strangeness, even if it&rsquo;s hard to detect.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;[…] said the guide, &ldquo;I beg of you, Senor Don Quixote, to observe carefully and examine with a hundred eyes everything that is within there; perhaps there may be some things for me to put into my book of &lsquo;Transformations.&rsquo;&rdquo; <em>&ldquo;The drum is in hands that will know how to beat it well enough,&rdquo;</em> said Sancho Panza. (Emphasis added.)&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption"><cite>10280–10282</cite></div></div><p>There&rsquo;s this brilliant bit wherein Quixote makes up a word, for once, then corrects Panza when he misquotes it, chiding him for not knowing Latin.</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;As Sancho said this, he tied the beasts, leaving them to the care and protection of the enchanters with sorrow enough in his heart. Don Quixote bade him not be uneasy about deserting the animals, &ldquo;for he who would carry themselves over such longinquous roads and regions would take care to feed them.&rdquo;</p>
<p>&ldquo;&ldquo;I don&rsquo;t understand that logiquous,&rdquo; said Sancho, &ldquo;nor have I ever heard the word all the days of my life.&rdquo;</p>
<p>&ldquo;&ldquo;Longinquous,&rdquo; replied Don Quixote, &ldquo;means far off; but it is no wonder thou dost not understand it, for thou art not bound to know Latin, like some who pretend to know it and don&rsquo;t.&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote><p>And here is Don Quixote, waxing once again very eloquently and loquaciously, in effect saying &ldquo;step off, you don&rsquo;t know what you&rsquo;re talking about.&rdquo;.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The place I am in, the presence in which I stand, and the respect I have and always have had for the profession to which your worship belongs, hold and bind the hands of my just indignation; and as well for these reasons as because I know, as everyone knows, that a gownsman&rsquo;s weapon is the same as a woman&rsquo;s, the tongue, I will with mine engage in equal combat with your worship, from whom one might have expected good advice instead of foul abuse. Pious, well-meant reproof requires a different demeanour and arguments of another sort; at any rate, to have reproved me in public, and so roughly, exceeds the bounds of proper reproof, for that comes better with gentleness than with rudeness; and it is not seemly to call the sinner roundly blockhead and booby, without knowing anything of the sin that is reproved.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">&mdash;<cite>Don Quixote</cite> (<cite>Pos. 11271–11273</cite>)</div></div><p>And poor Sancho has still not given up on his dreams. It&rsquo;s so hard to tell whether he really believes this, while at the same knowing of Quixote&rsquo;s utter madness. He would not be the first nor the last to harbor such cognitive dissonance.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;[…] neither will he be in any want of empires to rule, or I of islands to govern.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption"><cite>11295</cite></div></div><p>And again, I cannot honestly tell how many layers of sarcasm there are here: is it the (purported) original translator, the author or Sancho who is here being sarcastic? Does Sancho really think this? Or is he thinking what a dolt Quixote is for not having noticed that the devil cannot be the devil he claims?</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;If you were the devil, as you say and as your appearance indicates,&ldquo; said the duke, &ldquo;you would have known the said knight Don Quixote of La Mancha, for you have him here before you.</p>
<p>&ldquo;By God and upon my conscience,&rdquo; said the devil, &ldquo;I never observed it, for my mind is occupied with so many different things that I was forgetting the main thing I came about.</p>
<p>&ldquo;This demon must be an honest fellow and a good Christian,&rdquo; said Sancho; &ldquo;for if he wasn&rsquo;t he wouldn&rsquo;t swear by God and his conscience; I feel sure now there must be good souls even in hell itself.&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption"><cite>Pos. 11644–11648</cite></div></div><p>And here we see  effusive praise showered upon Quixote by the duke, despite the duke knowing that it&rsquo;s lies. Quixote may believe it, but he knows in part of his heart that it is not true. But his doubts are quickly washed away with this type of obsequy. It&rsquo;s as if saying it more makes it all the more  true, that the praise calls forth the immanent prowess. This seems to be the whole point of this second part: starting as a joke, but these people are all contributing to making the utter fantasy of the first half become nearly real—at least for Quixote and Panza—and once it&rsquo;s real, their mockery will be hollow because of their own actions. It&rsquo;s quite complex and rich, actually.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;I say so, because your excellence has been barely six days in this castle, and already the unhappy and the afflicted come in quest of you from lands far distant and remote, and not in coaches or on dromedaries, but on foot and fasting, confident that in that mighty arm they will find a cure for their sorrows and troubles; thanks to your great achievements, which are circulated all over the known earth.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption"><cite>11854–11855</cite></div></div><p>To this high praise, Quixote, whose doubts in his own prowess have been dispelled by such effusiveness, responds thusly,</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;[…] those suffering any extraordinary affliction or sorrow, in extreme cases and unusual misfortunes do not go to look for a remedy to the houses of jurists or village sacristans, or to the knight who has never attempted to pass the bounds of his own town, or to the indolent courtier who only seeks for news to repeat and talk of, instead of striving to do deeds and exploits for others to relate and record. Relief in distress, help in need, protection for damsels, consolation for widows, are to be found in no sort of persons better than in knights-errant;&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption"><cite>Pos. 11857–11861</cite></div></div><p>Sancho is told the same, in no uncertain terms, by his majordomo, once he becomes governor. See emphasis.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;There is so much in what your worship says, senor governor,&rdquo; said the majordomo, &ldquo;that I am filled with wonder when I see a man like your worship, entirely without learning (for I believe you have none at all), say such things, and so full of sound maxims and sage remarks, very different from what was expected of your worship&rsquo;s intelligence by those who sent us or by us who came here. Every day we see something new in this world; <em>jokes become realities, and the jokers find the tables turned upon them.</em>&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">&mdash;<cite>majordomo</cite> (<cite>Pos. 12977–12981</cite>)</div></div><p>And almost every chapter ends with an enticement to read the next. This example is from the end of chapter XXXVII but is typical of the style and is likely an inside joke as well.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;[…] and here the author brought this short chapter to an end and began the next, following up the same adventure, which is one of the most notable in the history.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption"><cite>Pos. 11890–11893</cite></div></div><p>Once again, it is difficult to know at this distance whether I am viewing the following passage as ironic simply because it passes through my more modern and liberal interpretive lens, or whether Cervantes really meant to poke fun at those who truly thought that a Moor would know only of <span class="quote-inline">&ldquo;charity, humility, faith, obedience, and poverty&rdquo;</span> because <span class="quote-inline">&ldquo;Christians&rdquo;</span> had told him of them.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;<em>Although a Moor</em>, I know well enough from the intercourse I have had with Christians that holiness consists in charity, humility, faith, obedience, and poverty; but for all that, I say he must have a great deal of godliness who can find any satisfaction in being poor; unless, indeed, it be the kind of poverty one of their greatest saints refers to, saying, &lsquo;possess all things as though ye possessed them not;&rsquo;&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption"><cite>Page 12486-12488</cite></div></div><p>Or this passage about poor gentlemen who pretend to greater wealth than they have, just to protect their so-called honor. I can only imagine that he mocks them,</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Poor gentleman of good family! always cockering up his honour, dining miserably and in secret, and making a hypocrite of the toothpick with which he sallies out into the street after eating nothing to oblige him to use it! Poor fellow, I say, with his nervous honour, fancying they perceive a league off the patch on his shoe, the sweat-stains on his hat, the shabbiness of his cloak, and the hunger of his stomach!&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">&mdash;<cite>Cide Hamete</cite> (<cite>Pos. 12492</cite>)</div></div><p>Again, with the backhanded compliment: there are but two of these women and &ldquo;seldom&rdquo; means that one of them did it at least once.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;I always had a suspicion that gentleman had a passion for my daughter,&ldquo; said Ricote; &ldquo;but as I felt sure of my Ricota&rsquo;s virtue it gave me no uneasiness to know that he loved her; for thou must have heard it said, Sancho, that <strong>the Morisco women seldom or never engage in amours with the old Christians</strong>; and my daughter, who I fancy thought more of being a Christian than of lovemaking, would not trouble herself about the attentions of this heir. (Emphasis added.)&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption"><cite>Pos. 13647–13650</cite></div></div><p>And again, from Sancho:</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Enemies attacked us by night and put us in a great quandary, but the people of the island say they came off safe and victorious by the might of my arm; and <strong>may God give them as much health as there&rsquo;s truth in what they say.</strong> (Emphasis added.)&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">&mdash;<cite>Sancho Panza</cite> (<cite>Pos. 13742–13743</cite>)</div></div><p>Even this late in the game, you still can&rsquo;t tell whether Sancho is kidding or not, although we know he is aware of his own deception in the case of Dulcinea.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Oh, senor,&rdquo; said Sancho, &ldquo;those scoundrels are well used to changing whatever concerns my master from one thing into another. A knight that he overcame some time back, called the Knight of the Mirrors, they turned into the shape of the bachelor Samson Carrasco of our town and a great friend of ours; and my lady Dulcinea del Toboso they have turned into a common country wench; so I suspect this lacquey will have to live and die a lacquey all the days of his life.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption"><cite>Pos. 13822–13825</cite></div></div><p>Sancho lays down a scathing comment.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;But I can&rsquo;t imagine what it is that this damsel saw in your worship that could have conquered and captivated her so. What gallant figure was it, what bold bearing, what sprightly grace, what comeliness of feature, which of these things by itself, or what all together, could have made her fall in love with you? For indeed and in truth many a time I stop to look at your worship from the sole of your foot to the topmost hair of your head, and I see more to frighten one than to make one fall in love; moreover I have heard say that beauty is the first and main thing that excites love, and as your worship has none at all, I don&rsquo;t know what the poor creature fell in love with.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">&mdash;<cite>Sancho Panza</cite> (<cite>Pos. 13952–13955</cite>)</div></div><p>And here we see how relentless and single-minded Don Quixote is. Despite his having achieved his goal of becoming a famous knight-errant—and this despite his utter ineptitude—he still needs more. He still needs to disenchant his precious Dulcinea, whom he has still never officially met. Sancho will come out ahead and he does manipulate Quixote, but he is eminently manipulable because his madness makes him so selfish. As so many, he thinks he acts in the interests of everyone else, but his action are far from altruistic. Dulcinea&rsquo;s enchantment, for example, must be lifted so that the beauty of the object of his love is restored, not for her sake, but for his.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Sancho, if thou wilt do for me what I am going to tell thee my ease of mind would be more assured and my heaviness of heart not so great; and it is this; to go aside a little while I am sleeping in accordance with thy advice, and, making bare thy carcase to the air, to give thyself three or four hundred lashes with Rocinante&rsquo;s reins, on account of the three thousand and odd thou art to give thyself for the disenchantment of Dulcinea; for it is a great pity that the poor lady should be left enchanted through thy carelessness and negligence.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption"><cite>Pos. 14068–14071</cite></div></div><p>Sancho would eventually concede to at least pretend to administer the lashes. Quixote would be convinced that the lashes had been delivered by Sancho upon himself; instead, the lashes served to flay the bark off of several trees over the course of a few nights. Sancho&rsquo;s back remained untouched, a condition that didn&rsquo;t raise any suspicion in Quixote. Not only that, but Sancho also convinced Quixote to <em>pay him</em>—quite handsomely—for the lashes that he never administered. And, in the end, Dulcinea&rsquo;s enchantment was, mysteriously, never lifted. The enchantment that Sancho had himself invented out of whole cloth, but which Quixote&rsquo;s madness made nearly inevitable.</p>
<p>Near the end of the book, Cervantes writes what for all the world feels like the precursor to the &ldquo;Cheese Shop&rdquo; skit by Monty Python.</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>To this the landlord replied that his mouth should be the measure; he had only to ask what he would; for that inn was provided with the birds of the air and the fowls of the earth and the fish of the sea.</p>
<p>&ldquo;There&rsquo;s no need of all that,&rdquo; said Sancho; &ldquo;if they&rsquo;ll roast us a couple of chickens we&rsquo;ll be satisfied, for my master is delicate and eats little, and I&rsquo;m not over and above gluttonous.&rdquo;</p>
<p>The landlord replied he had no chickens, for the kites had stolen them.</p>
<p>&ldquo;Well then,&rdquo; said Sancho, &ldquo;let senor landlord tell them to roast a pullet, so that it is a tender one.&rdquo;</p>
<p>&ldquo;Pullet! My father!&rdquo; said the landlord; &ldquo;indeed and in truth it&rsquo;s only yesterday I sent over fifty to the city to sell; but saving pullets ask what you will.&rdquo;</p>
<p>&ldquo;In that case,&rdquo; said Sancho, &ldquo;you will not be without veal or kid.&rdquo;</p>
<p>&ldquo;Just now,&rdquo; said the landlord, &ldquo;there&rsquo;s none in the house, for it&rsquo;s all finished; but next week there will be enough and to spare.&rdquo;</p>
<p>&ldquo;Much good that does us,&rdquo; said Sancho; &ldquo;I&rsquo;ll lay a bet that all these short-comings are going to wind up in plenty of bacon and eggs.&rdquo;</p>
<p>&ldquo;By God,&rdquo; said the landlord, &ldquo;my guest&rsquo;s wits must be precious dull; I tell him I have neither pullets nor hens, and he wants me to have eggs! Talk of other dainties, if you please, and don&rsquo;t ask for hens again.&rdquo;</p>
<p>&ldquo;Body o&rsquo; me!&rdquo; said Sancho, &ldquo;let&rsquo;s settle the matter; say at once what you have got, and let us have no more words about it.&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote><p><span class="quote-inline">&ldquo;The landlord replied he had no chickens, for the kites had stolen them.&rdquo;</span> sounds a lot like <span class="quote-inline">&ldquo;The cat&rsquo;s eaten it.&rdquo;</span>.</p>
<p>Cervantes shows a mastery of description in some places, as here, near the end of the second part. It is hoped that Terry Gilliam will be able to make much of such passages, when he finally manages to put this story to film.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The dawn made way for the sun that with a face broader than a buckler began to rise slowly above the low line of the horizon; Don Quixote and Sancho gazed all round them; they beheld the sea, a sight until then unseen by them; it struck them as exceedingly spacious and broad, much more so than the lakes of Ruidera which they had seen in La Mancha. They saw the galleys along the beach, which, lowering their awnings, displayed themselves decked with streamers and pennons that trembled in the breeze and kissed and swept the water, while on board the bugles, trumpets, and clarions were sounding and filling the air far and near with melodious warlike notes.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption"><cite>Pos. 14363–14367</cite></div></div><p>In the end, the world preferred Quixote as a madman.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;O senor,&ldquo; said Don Antonio, &ldquo;may God forgive you the wrong you have done the whole world in trying to bring the most amusing madman in it back to his senses. Do you not see, senor, that the gain by Don Quixote&rsquo;s sanity can never equal the enjoyment his crazes give?&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption"><cite>Pos. 14785–14787</cite></div></div><p>And here Sancho steers the conversation about to focus on relieving him of any burdens.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Your worship is right,&rdquo; said Sancho; &ldquo;for, as sensible people hold, &lsquo;the fault of the ass must not be laid on the pack-saddle;&rsquo; and, as in this affair the fault is your worship&rsquo;s, punish yourself and don&rsquo;t let your anger break out against the already battered and bloody armour, or the meekness of Rocinante, <strong>or the tenderness of my feet</strong>, trying to make them travel more than is reasonable. (Emphasis added.)&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption"><cite>Pos. 14867–14870</cite></div></div><p>One last time, Quixote tries to dissuade Panza from his excessively proverbial manner of speech.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;A truce to thy proverbs, Sancho,&rdquo; exclaimed Don Quixote; &ldquo;any one of those thou hast uttered would suffice to explain thy meaning; many a time have I recommended thee not to be so lavish with proverbs and to exercise some moderation in delivering them; but it seems to me it is only &lsquo;preaching in the desert;&rsquo; &lsquo;my mother beats me and I go on with my tricks.&rdquo; &ldquo;It seems to me,&rdquo; said Sancho, &ldquo;that your worship is like the common saying, &lsquo;Said the frying-pan to the kettle, Get away, blackbreech.&rsquo; You chide me for uttering proverbs, and you string them in couples yourself.&rdquo; &ldquo;Observe, Sancho,&rdquo; replied Don Quixote, &ldquo;I bring in proverbs to the purpose, and when I quote them they fit like a ring to the finger; thou bringest them in by the head and shoulders, in such a way that thou dost drag them in, rather than introduce them;&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption"><cite>Pos. 14979–14985</cite></div></div><p>Despite all evidence, despite all appearances, despite all that has happened, one thing remains fixed in Quixote&rsquo;s mind: he is a knight of unparalleled fighting strength and skill.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Don Quixote turned to Sancho and said, &ldquo;If I could make use of my weapons, and my promise had not tied my hands, I would count this host that comes against us but cakes and fancy bread;&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption"><cite>Pos. 15045–15046</cite></div></div><p>The expression <span class="quote-inline">&ldquo;as last year&rsquo;s clouds&rdquo;</span> came up quite a few times and I quite like it.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;There, senor! there are the omens broken and destroyed, and they have no more to do with our affairs, to my thinking, fool as I am, than with last year&rsquo;s clouds; […]&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">&mdash;<cite>Sancho Panza</cite> (<cite>Pos. 15410–15411</cite>)</div></div><p>In the end, Don Quixote must convince his friends that the madman of the past year is gone. But though they started off feeling sorry for him, then mocking him, they seemed to have genuinely liked him better as the mad knight-errant.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Sirs, not so fast,&rdquo; said Don Quixote, &ldquo;&lsquo;in last year&rsquo;s nests there are no birds this year.&lsquo; I was mad, now I am in my senses; I was Don Quixote of La Mancha, I am now, as I said, Alonso Quixano the Good; and may my repentance and sincerity restore me to the esteem you used to have for me; and now let Master Notary proceed.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption"><cite>Pos. 15523-15526</cite></div></div><h2>Errata</h2><p>When I read books that I downloaded from <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org">Gutenberg Project</a>, I like to be helpful and provide corrections where I can. They have a very friendly and responsive errata-submission system.</p>
<pre class=" ">Title: Don Quixote, by Miguel de Cervantes Saavedra

       Translated by John Ormsby
       January 27, 2004 [EBook #966]
File:  pg996.epub, pg996.mobi

Page 148-149:
  that verily and truly be believed his last hour had come
    change “be” to “he”; and truly [he] believed his last hour
 
Page 150-151:
  seeing that the ceiling was somewhat lower what they required for their work
    add “than” between “lower” and “what&rdquo;; somewhat lower [than] what they

Page 168-169:
  in this our iron age to revive revive in it the age of gold
    remove the duplicated “revive”
 
Page 282:
  but I implore you, señor, not not to be so revengeful in the future
    remove the duplicated “not”
 
Page 288-289:
  they shall give me a portion portion of the kingdom
    remove the duplicated “portion”

Page 305:
  for even if the issue he as thou wouldst have it
    change “he” to “be”; if the issue [be] as thou
 
Page 331-332:
  led home by the hand him who had been the utter
    add “of” between “hand” and “him”; by the hand [of] him

Page 338:
  without missing Camilla from his side, rose cager to learn what Leonela
    change “cager&rdquo; to “eager”
 
Page 354:
  and approaching her who by her dress seemed to be a Moor he her 
  down from saddle in his arms.
    this sentence is quite confused. I don&rsquo;t know the original, but a better 
    structure in the original style would be:
       who by her dress seemed to be a Moor, he [took] her down from [the] 
       saddle [into] his arms.
 
Page 408–409:
  To enable her to vent over it the great passion passion which has brought her
    remove the duplicated “passion”

Pos. 6934:
  which I won from him in air war, and made myself master of by legitimate and lawful possession.
    change “air” to “fair”; which I won from him in [f]air war

Pos. 6977:
  but the one who above all was at his wits’ end, was the barber basin, 
  there before his very eyes, had been turned
    add “whose” between “barber” and “basin”; was at his wits’ end, was 
    the barber [whose] basin, there before his very eyes

Pos. 7150:
  entered the room where he was asleep, taking his his rest after the past frays, and advancing to
    remove duplicated “his”; taking his rest after the past frays

Pos. 7603:
  so let the country come, and God he with you, and let us
    change “he” to “be”; so let the country come, and God [b]e with you,

Pos. 7761:
  Now, noble company, ye shall see how important it is that there should 
  be knights in the world professing the of knight-errantry;
    word missing between “the” and “of”; world professing the […] of knight-errantry;

Pos. 7783:
  cried out to his assailant not to strike him again, for he was poor enchanted knight,
    add “a” between “was” and “poor”; for he was [a] poor enchanted knight,
    
Pos. 8233:
  it was whispered that he was over quarrelsome, and of his brother that he was lachrymose.
    add a hyphen between “over” and “quarrelsome”; it was whispered that he was over[-]quarrelsome

Pos. 8471-8472:
  Let her he &lsquo;my lady,&rsquo; and never mind what happens.&ldquo;
    change &ldquo;he&rdquo; to &ldquo;be&rdquo;; Let her [be] &lsquo;my lady,&rsquo; and never mind what happens.&ldquo;

Pos. 8586:
  and the whole herd (if I may such a word to them)
    add &ldquo;apply&rdquo; between &ldquo;may&rdquo; and &ldquo;such&rdquo;; (if I may [apply] such a word to them)

Pos. 8651:
  to be paid monthly while I am in your service, and that the same he paid me out of your estate;
    change &ldquo;he&rdquo; to &ldquo;be&rdquo;; and that the same [be] paid me out of your estate

Pos. 8996-8997:
  that side on which she has the one on her ace;
    change &ldquo;ace&rdquo; to &ldquo;face&rdquo;; on which she has the one on her [face]

Pos. 9494:
  in whatever shape he may have been, I have victorious over my enemy.&ldquo;
    add &ldquo;been&rdquo; between &ldquo;have&rdquo; and &ldquo;victorious&rdquo;; I have [been] victorious over my enemy.

Pos. 9538:
  and was waiting him to confirm it by something further;
    add &ldquo;for&rdquo; between &ldquo;waiting&rdquo; and &ldquo;him&rdquo;; and was waiting [for] him to confirm it

Pos. 9882:
  and a couple of pairs of-ribbed stockings
    remove the hyphen between &ldquo;of&rdquo; and &ldquo;ribbed&rdquo;; and a couple of pairs of ribbed stockings

Pos. 10492:
  to whom do you mean dedicate them?
    add &ldquo;to&rdquo; between &ldquo;mean&rdquo; and &ldquo;dedicate&rdquo;; to whom do you mean [to] dedicate them?

Pos.  11128:
  but however I may be, allen or raised up
    change &ldquo;allen&rdquo; to &ldquo;fallen&rdquo;; but however I may be, [f]allen or raised up

Pos. 11517:
  Let Sancho he of good cheer
    change &ldquo;he&rdquo; to &ldquo;be&rdquo;; Let Sancho [b]e of good cheer

Pos. 11740:
  socks-not that wear any—to coax me?
    add &ldquo;I&rdquo; between &ldquo;that&rdquo; and &ldquo;wear&rdquo;; not that [I] wear any

Pos. 12216:
  and then ran to embrace Don Quixote with-open arms
    remove the hyphen between &ldquo;with&rdquo; and &ldquo;open&rdquo;; embrace Don Quixote with open arms

Pos. 12296:
  take care that the dignity of the office they hold he accompanied by
    change &ldquo;he&rdquo; to &ldquo;be&rdquo;; office they hold [be] accompanied by

 Pos. 12445:
  with a gaban of tawny watered camlet over all
    change &ldquo;gaban&rdquo; to &ldquo;gabán&rdquo;; with a gabán of tawny watered camlet

Pos. 12471:
  &ldquo;Well, well, Senor Don Quixote,&rdquo; said the duchess, is nearly supper-time,
  and the duke is is probably waiting
    change &ldquo;, is&rdquo; to &ldquo;&rdquo;it is&rdquo; and remove the duplicate &ldquo;is&rdquo;; &ldquo;Well, well, Senor 
    Don Quixote,&rdquo; said the duchess, [&ldquo;it ]is nearly supper-time, and the duke 
    is probably waiting

Pos. 12734:
  But what I am of opinion the governor should cat now in order to preserve and fortify his health
    replace &ldquo;cat&rdquo; with &ldquo;eat&rdquo;; the governor should [e]at now in order to

Pos. 12939:
  Nor was the apprehension an idle one; one; for leaving the duenna
    remove duplicate &ldquo;one;&rdquo;; an idle one; for leaving the duenna

Pos. 13325-13326:
  and I have chosen youth for a son-in-law
    add &ldquo;the&rdquo; between &ldquo;chosen&rdquo; and &ldquo;youth&rdquo;; and I have chosen [the] youth

Pos. 13516-13517:
  than be subject to the misery of a meddling doctor who me with hunger
    add a verb between &ldquo;who&rdquo; and &ldquo;me&rdquo;; doctor who [tortures?] me with hunger

Pos. 13564:
  who bas frenchified thee
    replace &ldquo;bas&rdquo; with &ldquo;has&rdquo;; who [h]as frenchified thee

Pos. 13771:
  The first person to enter the-field and the lists
    remove the hyphen between &ldquo;the&rdquo; and &ldquo;field&rdquo;; to enter the field

Pos. 14001:
  And now the gave was started
    replace &ldquo;gave&rdquo; with &ldquo;game&rdquo;; And now the ga[m]e was started

Pos. 14104:
  heard his own name be started to his feet and
    replace &ldquo;be&rdquo; with &ldquo;he&rdquo;; heard his own name [h]e started to his feet

Pos. 14457:
  somewhat free in playing tricks for harmless diversion sake
    add &ldquo;&lsquo;s&rdquo; after &ldquo;diversion&rdquo;; for harmless diversion[&rsquo;s] sake 

Pos. 14767:
  thither the viceroy himself returned, cager to ascertain who this Knight
    replace &ldquo;cager&rdquo; with &ldquo;eager&rdquo;; [e]ager to ascertain who this Knight

Pos. 14969:
  Alheli and alfaqui are seen to be Arabic, as well by the al at the beginning as by the they end with
    add &ldquo;i&rdquo; between &ldquo;the&rdquo; and &ldquo;they&rdquo;; as by the [i] they end with

Pos. 15081–15082:
  and seeing painted with devils he put it
    add &ldquo;it&rdquo; between &ldquo;seeing&rdquo; and &ldquo;painted&rdquo;; and seeing [it] painted with devils

Pos. 15325–15327:
  &ldquo;I don&rsquo;t know what bad luck it is of mine,&rdquo; argument to my mind; however, I mean 
  to mend said Sancho, &ldquo;but I can&rsquo;t utter a word without a proverb that is not as good
  as an argument to my mind; however, I mean to mend if I can;&rdquo;
    remove &ldquo;argument to my mind; however, I mean to mend &ldquo; between &ldquo;mine&rdquo; 
    and &ldquo;said&rdquo;; &ldquo;I don&rsquo;t know what bad luck it is of mine,&rdquo; said Sancho, &ldquo;but I can&rsquo;t utter 
    a word without a proverb that is not as good as an argument to my mind; however,
    I mean to mend if I can;&rdquo;

Pos. 15336:
  &ldquo;In what direction your worship bound, gentle sir?&rdquo;
    add &ldquo;is&rdquo; between &ldquo;direction&rdquo; and &ldquo;your&rdquo;; &ldquo;In what direction [is] your worship bound

Pos. 15469:
  For-whether it was of the dejection
    remove the hyphen between &ldquo;For&rdquo; and &ldquo;whether&rdquo;; For whether it was of

Pos. 15510:
  as soon as the preamble of the had been set
    add &ldquo;will&rdquo; or &ldquo;testament&rdquo; between &ldquo;the&rdquo; and &ldquo;had&rdquo;; preamble of the [will] had been set</pre><h2>Style issues</h2><p>Since I couldn&rsquo;t find the source text, I couldn&rsquo;t determine whether the occasional omission of the preposition &ldquo;to&rdquo; between the verb &ldquo;happen&rdquo; and the following word was a stylistic one. I suspected it might be, so I collected those errata (and related ones) into this separate pile.</p>
<pre class=" ">Pos. 8819-8820
  where something happened them that may fairly be called something.
    add &ldquo;to&rdquo; between &ldquo;happened&rdquo; and &ldquo;them&rdquo;; where something happened [to] them

Pos. 9758-9759:
  OF WHAT HAPPENED DON QUIXOTE
    add &ldquo;to&rdquo; between &ldquo;HAPPENED&rdquo; and &ldquo;DON&rdquo;; WHAT HAPPENED [TO] DON QUIXOTE

Pos. 9936-9937:
  spectacles that make copper seem gold, poverty wealth, and blear eyes pearls.&ldquo;
    change &ldquo;blear&rdquo; to &ldquo;bleary&rdquo; or &ldquo;bleared&rdquo;; and blear[y] eyes pearls.

Pos. 10099:
  she is no way squeamish,
    add &ldquo;in&rdquo; between &ldquo;is&rdquo; and &ldquo;no&rdquo;; she is [in] no way squeamish

Pos. 10652:
  I would ask senor ape what will happen me in the peregrination
    add &ldquo;to&rdquo; between &ldquo;happen&rdquo; and &ldquo;me&rdquo;; what will happen [to] me in the

Pos. 10675:
  ask his ape whether what happened your worship in the cave
    add &ldquo;to&rdquo; between &ldquo;happened&rdquo; and &ldquo;your&rdquo;; what happened [to] your worship

Pos. 10890:
  but this master of mine is a tologian
    replace &ldquo;tologian&rdquo; with &ldquo;theologian&rdquo;; but this master of mine is a [theologian]

Pos. 11109:
  could happen me that could
    add &ldquo;to&rdquo; between &ldquo;happen&rdquo; and &ldquo;me&rdquo;; could happen [to] me that could

Pos. 11125-11126:
  has happened me in meeting
    add &ldquo;to&rdquo; between &ldquo;happened&rdquo; and &ldquo;me&rdquo;; has happened [to] me in meeting

Pos. 11178:
  more for authority and custom sake than
    add &ldquo;&lsquo;s&rdquo; after &ldquo;custom&rdquo;; more for authority and custom[&rsquo;s] sake than

Pos. 11400:
  almost everything that happens me transcends the ordinary
    add &ldquo;to&rdquo; between &ldquo;happens&rdquo; and &ldquo;me&rdquo;; everything that happens [to] me

Pos. 11583:
  to sell it the first opportunity.
    add &ldquo;at&rdquo; between &ldquo;it&rdquo; and &ldquo;the&rdquo;; to sell it [at] the first opportunity.

Pos. 11805:
  and I am no way behind him.
    add &ldquo;in&rdquo; between &ldquo;am&rdquo; and &ldquo;no&rdquo;; and I am [in] no way behind him.

Pos. 12556:
  who were not in the secret, and
    add &ldquo;on&rdquo; between &ldquo;in&rdquo; and &ldquo;the&rdquo;; who were not in [on] the secret

Pos. 12945:
  HAPPENED SANCHO IN MAKING THE
    Add &ldquo;TO&rdquo; between &ldquo;HAPPENED&rdquo; and &ldquo;SANCHO&rdquo;; HAPPENED [TO] SANCHO

Pos. 12991:
  speaking him fairly and civilly asked
    add &ldquo;to&rdquo; between &ldquo;speaking&rdquo; and &ldquo;him&rdquo;; speaking [to] him fairly and civilly

Pos. 13040:
  those who were in the secret of the jokes
    add &ldquo;on&rdquo; between &ldquo;in&rdquo; and &ldquo;the&rdquo;; who were in [on] the secret

Pos. 13215-13216:
  and that I have heard the said Sancho Panza bears himself
    change &ldquo;the said&rdquo; to &ldquo;it said that&rdquo;; I have heard it said that Sancho</pre><p><hr></p>
<div class="footnote-reference"><span id="footnote_DRAFTABLE_ENTRY_3035_1_body" class="footnote-number">[1]</span> <p>For a deeper analysis of this, see the interesting post <a href="http://www.jehsmith.com/1/2015/05/making-shit-up.html">Making Shit Up</a> by <cite>J.E.H. Smith</cite>.</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;To which genre of writing [poetry or history] is Don Quixote supposed to belong, now? The answer seems inseparable from the question of the work&rsquo;s authorship, and of its actual subject. The possibility is briefly considered, more than once, that Sancho Panza is the real hero of the novel, a possibility that is of course mocked and dismissed by Don Quixote himself, who claims that it would violate the most basic rules governing the knights-errant literature to place the squire at the center of the tale, rather than to have him subordinate to his knight. But there is of course very little in the novel that does respect these rules, and in this respect the suggestion and the refutation go together as a sort of affirmation.</p>
<p>&ldquo;[…]</p>
<p>&ldquo;Cervantes&rsquo;s invention of the Cide, and his characters&rsquo; coming to self-consciousness as the inventions of Cide, is a particularly complex variation on the sort of meditation on truth and falsehood, and on poetry and history, that seems to have served as a metafictional accompaniment to many important prose works from the ancient to the early modern periods.</p>
<p>&ldquo;[…]</p>
<p>&ldquo;One genre that appears to preserve, and to be sustained by, the same problematic charge that makes Don Quixote a masterpiece is the genre that is sometimes called &lsquo;parafiction&rsquo;, the genre of pseudocumentary, of the fake encyclopedia entry, perfected by Borges and evoked in the literary work of Calvino, Bolaño, of Luigi Serafini with his separatist universe encyclopedized in the Codex Seraphinianum, of all the tongue-in-cheek footnotes and pseudo-critical apparatus of the various postmoderns, who seem, in their way, to in fact be returning to a premodern preoccupation with the moral and metaphysical problem of presenting as true what is in fact false, a concern that was only temporarily hidden by the canonization and nationalization of the novel as recently as the 19th century.&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div>      </div>
      </div>
        <div class="footer">
    <div class="footer-data"><div class="footer-links"><ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/contact.php" title="">Contact</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/support.php" title="">Support</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/privacy.php" title="">Privacy</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/rights.php" title="">Rights</a></li></ul></div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="copyright">Copyright (c) 1999-2026 earthli.com. All Rights Reserved.</div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="versions">Powered by <ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore/app_news.php">earthli News 3.7</a></li><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore" title="">earthli WebCore&trade; 3.7</a></li></ul></div></div>    </div>
      </div>
  </div>  </body>
</html>
]]>
  </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
      <title type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[Foucault's Pendulum by Umberto Eco (Dec. 2009)]]>
  </title>
    <id>https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=2269</id>
    <link href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=2269"/>
    <updated>2015-02-22T23:00:57+01:00</updated>
    <author>
        <name type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[Marco von Ballmoos]]>
  </name>
      <uri>https://earthli.com/users/marco</uri>
    </author>
      <summary type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<blockquote class="quote abstract "><div>This article is more a compendium of notes I took while reading this book. It includes citations I found interesting or enlightening of particularly well-written. In some cases, I&rsquo;ve pointed out which of these applies to which citation. In others, I have not. Any benefit you gain from reading these... [<a class="complete-text-link" href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=2269">More</a>]</div></blockquote>]]>
  </summary>
      <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<html lang="en">
  <head>
    <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/themes/ice.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/fonts/raleway.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/core/medium.css">
  </head>
  <body>
<div class="style-controls">  <div class="page">
    <div class="page-body">
<div class="info-box-top">
<p>
Published by <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_user.php?name=marco" title="Marco von Ballmoos" class="visible">marco</a> on <span class="date-time">22. Feb 2015 23:00:57 (GMT-5)</span>
</p>
</div>
      <div class="text-flow wide">
  <blockquote class="quote abstract "><div>This article is more a compendium of notes I took while reading this book. It includes citations I found interesting or enlightening of particularly well-written. In some cases, I&rsquo;ve pointed out which of these applies to which citation. In others, I have not. Any benefit you gain from reading these notes is purely incidental to the purpose they serve of reminding what I once read. Please see Wikipedia for a summary if I&rsquo;ve failed to provide one sufficient for your purposes. If my notes serve to trigger an interest in this book, then I&rsquo;m happy for you.</div></blockquote><h2>Notes</h2><p>How do you know you&rsquo;re right? Why do conviction and depth of analysis seem to be inversely proportional?</p>
<p>Diotallevi is a Hebrew scholar so he noted that the Hebrew characters in some of the &ldquo;diabolical&rdquo; tracts were incorrect or made no sense. But the people who wrote those tracts were absolutely convinced that they did and that they supported their own theories (whatever those may be). </p>
<p>Who&rsquo;s right?</p>
<p>Is Diotallevi clearly right because he&rsquo;s the scholar in a discipline that&rsquo;s accepted today or is he the deluded one and the misuser of Hebrew is the one who found the deeper truth?</p>
<p>When they visit Aglié for the first time, he is rambling along in what must be assumed is an erudite fashion when he mentions that Diotellevi seems to be intrigued by the Hebrew characters on one of the books in his (Aglié&rsquo;s) library. Has Diotallevi found another bastardization of Hebrew? Is Aglié full of shit? Is he, like all the others he derides, simply weaving gossamer towers of reality that don&rsquo;t, in fact, exist?</p>
<p>The book makes you realize how many people are misled by conspiracy, but makes you wonder which people those are, actually. Or is everyone misled into thinking that their worldview is coherent? Feedback from reality seems to be the only true arbiter in this case.</p>
<ol>
<li>Pity suckers deluded by false chains of reasoning</li>
<li>Realize that you yourself might also be such a sucker</li>
<li>Desperately examine everything you believe for provability, veracity, corroboratability</li>
<li>Reassure yourself that all is good</li>
<li>Resolve to be vigilant</li>
<li><em>Everyone</em> does this, to one degree or another</li>
<li>Given that, is it still possible to disprove others?</li></ol><p>Yes.</p>
<h2>Citations</h2><p><small class="notes">These were transcribed by hand from a paperback. Please excuse transcription errors.</small></p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;In those halcyon days I believed that the source of enigma was stupidity. Then the other evening in the periscope I decided that the most terrible enigmas are those that mask themselves as madness. But now I have come to believe that the whole world is an enigma, a harmless enigma that is made terrible by our own mad attempt to interpret it as though it had an underlying truth.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 81</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;'O basta là,&lsquo; Belbo said. Only another child of Piedmont could have understood the spirit in which this expression of polite amazement was uttered. No equivalent in any other language or dialect (dis donc, are you kidding?) can convey the apathy, the fatalism with which it expresses the firm conviction that the person to whom it is addressed is, irreparably, the product of a bumbling creator.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 123–124</div></div><p>Kind of disagree here … &ldquo;get the <em>f$#@k</em> outta heah&rdquo; also pretty much nails it.</p>
<p>How the Bible came to be:</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Now that you mention it, let&rsquo;s see. Matthew, Mark, Luke and John are a bunch of practical jokers who meet somewhere and decide to have a contest. They invent a character, agree on a few basic facts, and then each one is free to take it and run with it. At the end, they&rsquo;ll see who&rsquo;s done the best job. The four stories are picked up by some friends who act as critics: Matthew is fairly realistic, but insists on that Messiah business too much; Mark isn&rsquo;t bad, just a little sloppy; Luke is elegant, no denying that; and John takes the philosophy a little too far. Actually, though, the books have an appeal, they circulate, and when the four realize what&rsquo;s happening, it&rsquo;s too late. Paul has already met Jesus on the road to Damascus, Pliny begins his investigation ordered by the worried emperor, and a legion of apocryphal writers pretends also to know plenty. …Toi, apocyphe lecteur, mon semblable, mon frère. It all goes to Peter&rsquo;s head; he takes himself seriously. John threatens to tell the truth, Peter and Paul have him chained up on the island of Patmos. Soon the poor man is seeing things: Help, there are locusts all over my bed, make those trumpets stop, where&rsquo;s all this blood coming from? The others say he&rsquo;s drunk, or maybe it&rsquo;s arteriosclerosis. …Who knows, maybe it really happened that way.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 169</div></div><p>On the nature of conspiracy theorists:</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;'Exactly,&lsquo; Garamond said, missing the reference. &lsquo;It&rsquo;s a gold mine, all right. I realized that these people will gobble up anything that&rsquo;s hermetic, as you put it, anything that says the opposite of what they read in their books at school. […]&rsquo;&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 219</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;From the birth of Project Hermes until that day, I had enjoyed myself heedlessly at the expense of many people. Now, They were preparing to present the bill. I was as much of a bee as the ones we wanted to attract; and, like them, I was being quickly lured to a flower, though I didn&rsquo;t yet know what that flower was.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 231</div></div><p>A meta-conspiracy that leaves your mind in tatters as the onion skins fall away to reveal…nothing but paradox.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;My answer: There exists a secret society with branches throughout the world, and its plot is to spread the rumor that a universal plot exists. […] I&rsquo;m not joking. Come and read the manuscripts that turn up at Manutius. But if you want a more down-to-earth explanation, it&rsquo;s like the story of the man with a bad stammer who complains that the radio station wouldn&rsquo;t hire him as an announcer because he didn&rsquo;t carry a party card. We always have to blame our failures on somebody else, and dictatorships always need an external enemy to bind their followers together. <strong>As the man said, for every complex problem there&rsquo;s a simple solution, and it&rsquo;s wrong.</strong> (Emphasis added.)&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 265 (Causaubon speaking)</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;You were right. Any fact becomes important when it&rsquo;s connected to another. The connection changes the perspective; it leads you to think that every detail of the world, ever voice, every word written or spoken has more than its literal meaning, that it tells us of a Secret. The rule is simple: Suspect, only suspect. You can read subtexts even in a traffic sign that says &lsquo;No littering.&rsquo;&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 314 (Belbo speaking)</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The first duty of a good spy is to denounce as spies those whom he has infiltrated.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 406 (Causabon)</div></div><p>On succumbing to adultery:</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Vision, be mine; for just one instant crown with pleasure a life spent in the hard service of a jealous divinity, assuage with one lubricious embrace the eternity of flame to which your sight now plunges me. I beseech you, brush my face with your lips, you Antinea, you Mary Magdalene, you whom I have desired in the presence of saints dazed in ecstasy, whom I have coveted during my hypocritical worship of virginity. O Lady, fair art thou as the sun, white as the moon; lo I deny both God and the saints, and the Roman pontiff himself—no, more, I deny Loyola and the criminal vow that binds me to my Society. A kiss, one kiss, then let me die!&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 414 (Rodin speaking to a vision of beauty)</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Imagine a Viennese prankster, to amuse his friends, invented the whole business of the id and Oedipus, and made up dreams he had never dreamed and little Hanses he had never met…And what happened? Millions of people were out there, all ready and waiting to become neurotic in earnest. And thousands more ready to make money treating them.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 437 (Lia, after hearing of the Plan)</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Your plan isn&rsquo;t poetic; it&rsquo;s grotesque. People don&rsquo;t get the idea of going back to burn Troy just because they read Homer. With Homer, the burning of Troy became something that it never was and never will be, and yet the <em>Iliad</em> endures, full of meaning, because it&rsquo;s all clear, limpid. Your Rosicrucian manifestoes are neither clear nor limpid; they&rsquo;re mud, hot air, and promises. This is why so many people have tried to make them come true, each finding in them what he wants to find. In Homer there&rsquo;s no secret, but your plan is full of secrets, full of contradictions. For that reason you could find thousands of insecure people read to identify with it. Throw the whole thing out. Homer wasn&rsquo;t faking, but you three [Causaubon, Belbo and Diotallevi] have been faking. Beware of faking: people will believe you. People believe those who sell lotions that make lost hair grow back. They sense instinctively that the salesman is putting together truths that don&rsquo;t go together, that he&rsquo;s not being logical, that he&rsquo;s not speaking in good faith. But they&rsquo;ve been told that God is mysterious, unfathomable, so to them incoherence is the closest thing to God. The far-fetched is the closest thing to a miracle.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 437 (Lia, after hearing of the Plan)</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;If you feel guilty, you invent a plot, many plots. And to counter them, you have to organize your own plot. But the more you invent enemy plots, to exonerate your lack of understanding, the more you fall in love with them, and you pattern your own on their model. Which is what happened to when the Jesuits and Baconians, Paulicians and neo-Templars each complained of the other&rsquo;s plan. Diotallevi&rsquo;s remark was: &lsquo;Of course, you attribute to the others what you&rsquo;re doing yourself, and since what you&rsquo;re doing yourself is hateful, the other become hateful. But since the other, as a rule, would like to do the same hateful thing that you&rsquo;re doing, they collaborate with you, hinting that—yes—what you attribute to them is actually what they have always desired. God blinds those he wishes to destroy; you just have to lend Him a helping hand.&lsquo;&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 513</div></div>      </div>
      </div>
        <div class="footer">
    <div class="footer-data"><div class="footer-links"><ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/contact.php" title="">Contact</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/support.php" title="">Support</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/privacy.php" title="">Privacy</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/rights.php" title="">Rights</a></li></ul></div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="copyright">Copyright (c) 1999-2026 earthli.com. All Rights Reserved.</div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="versions">Powered by <ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore/app_news.php">earthli News 3.7</a></li><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore" title="">earthli WebCore&trade; 3.7</a></li></ul></div></div>    </div>
      </div>
  </div>  </body>
</html>
]]>
  </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
      <title type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[Rushdie on adaptation and Slumdog Millionaire]]>
  </title>
    <id>https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=2110</id>
    <link href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=2110"/>
    <updated>2015-02-22T22:35:33+01:00</updated>
    <author>
        <name type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[Marco von Ballmoos]]>
  </name>
      <uri>https://earthli.com/users/marco</uri>
    </author>
      <summary type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/books/2009/feb/28/salman-rushdie-novels-film-adaptations">A fine pickle</a> by <cite>Salman Rushdie</cite> (<cite><a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/">The Guardian</a></cite>)</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;In an interview conducted at the Telluride film festival last autumn, Boyle, when asked why he had chosen a project so different from his usual material, answered that he had never been to India and knew nothing about it, so he thought this project was a great opportunity. Listening... [<a class="complete-text-link" href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=2110">More</a>]&rdquo;</div></blockquote>]]>
  </summary>
      <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<html lang="en">
  <head>
    <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/themes/ice.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/fonts/raleway.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/core/medium.css">
  </head>
  <body>
<div class="style-controls">  <div class="page">
    <div class="page-body">
<div class="info-box-top">
<p>
Published by <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_user.php?name=marco" title="Marco von Ballmoos" class="visible">marco</a> on <span class="date-time">22. Feb 2015 22:35:33 (GMT-5)</span>
</p>
</div>
      <div class="text-flow wide">
  <p><a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/books/2009/feb/28/salman-rushdie-novels-film-adaptations">A fine pickle</a> by <cite>Salman Rushdie</cite> (<cite><a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/">The Guardian</a></cite>)</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;In an interview conducted at the Telluride film festival last autumn, Boyle, when asked why he had chosen a project so different from his usual material, answered that he had never been to India and knew nothing about it, so he thought this project was a great opportunity. Listening to him, I imagined an Indian film director making a movie about New York low-life and saying that he had done so because he knew nothing about New York and had indeed never been there. He would have been torn limb from limb by critical opinion. But for a first world director to say that about the third world is considered praiseworthy, an indication of his artistic daring. The double standards of post-colonial attitudes have not yet wholly faded away.&rdquo;</div></blockquote>      </div>
      </div>
        <div class="footer">
    <div class="footer-data"><div class="footer-links"><ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/contact.php" title="">Contact</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/support.php" title="">Support</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/privacy.php" title="">Privacy</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/rights.php" title="">Rights</a></li></ul></div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="copyright">Copyright (c) 1999-2026 earthli.com. All Rights Reserved.</div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="versions">Powered by <ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore/app_news.php">earthli News 3.7</a></li><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore" title="">earthli WebCore&trade; 3.7</a></li></ul></div></div>    </div>
      </div>
  </div>  </body>
</html>
]]>
  </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
      <title type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[Books read in 2013]]>
  </title>
    <id>https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=2775</id>
    <link href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=2775"/>
    <updated>2014-01-05T01:00:24+01:00</updated>
    <author>
        <name type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[Marco von Ballmoos]]>
  </name>
      <uri>https://earthli.com/users/marco</uri>
    </author>
      <summary type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<ol>
<li><a href="#11-22-63">11/22/63 (2011)</a></li>
<li><a href="#Billionaires">Billionaires and Bandits (2012)</a></li>
<li><a href="#Uniqueness">Uniqueness and Reference Immutability for Safe Parallelism (Extended Version) (2012)</a></li>
<li><a href="#Talk">Talk to the Hand (2005)</a></li>
<li><a href="#half-made">The Half-made World (2010)</a></li>
<li><a href="#Stadt">Die Stadt am Ende der Zeit (2008) (de)</a></li>
<li><a href="#Alchemist">The Alchemist (1992) (en/original in Portuguese in 1988)</a></li>
<li><a href="#Gatsby">The Great Gatsby... [<a class="complete-text-link" href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=2775">More</a>]</a></li></ol>]]>
  </summary>
      <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<html lang="en">
  <head>
    <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/themes/ice.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/fonts/raleway.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/core/medium.css">
  </head>
  <body>
<div class="style-controls">  <div class="page">
    <div class="page-body">
<div class="info-box-top">
<p>
Published by <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_user.php?name=marco" title="Marco von Ballmoos" class="visible">marco</a> on <span class="date-time">5. Jan 2014 01:00:24 (GMT-5)</span>
</p>
<p>
Updated by <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_user.php?name=marco" title="Marco von Ballmoos" class="visible">marco</a> on <span class="date-time">16. Dec 2025 09:05:53 (GMT-5)</span>
</p>
</div>
      <div class="text-flow wide">
  <ol>
<li><a href="#11-22-63">11/22/63 (2011)</a></li>
<li><a href="#Billionaires">Billionaires and Bandits (2012)</a></li>
<li><a href="#Uniqueness">Uniqueness and Reference Immutability for Safe Parallelism (Extended Version) (2012)</a></li>
<li><a href="#Talk">Talk to the Hand (2005)</a></li>
<li><a href="#half-made">The Half-made World (2010)</a></li>
<li><a href="#Stadt">Die Stadt am Ende der Zeit (2008) (de)</a></li>
<li><a href="#Alchemist">The Alchemist (1992) (en/original in Portuguese in 1988)</a></li>
<li><a href="#Gatsby">The Great Gatsby (1926)</a></li>
<li><a href="#next">The Next 100 Years (2009)</a></li>
<li><a href="#Common">Common Sense (1776)</a></li>
<li><a href="#Castle">We Have Always Lived in the Castle (1962)</a></li>
<li><a href="#Owls">Let&rsquo;s Explore Diabetes with Owls (2013)</a></li>
<li><a href="#Ransom">The Rise of Ransom City (2013)</a></li>
<li><a href="#Flood">Flood (2008)</a></li>
<li><a href="#Main">Main Street (1920)</a></li>
<li><a href="#Doctor">Doctor Sleep (2013)</a></li></ol><dl><dt class="field"><span id="11-22-63">11/22/63 (2011)</span></dt>
<dd><div class=" "><p>by <em>Stephen King</em></p>
<p>King takes on the legends surrounding the assassination of John F. Kennedy in the context of his &#xfb01;rst time-travel story. In typical King fashion, time travel is made much more di&#xfb03;cult than in other stories. Paradox is dispensed with by assigning malevolent intent to capital-T Time itself. Time has an agenda of its own—maintaining the one true time-line.</p>
<p>A young teacher befriends the owner of a diner, who has been diving into the past to get inexpensive and delicious meat for years. This seems to be a very mundane use of a time machine and King obviously dresses it up much more than that—he&rsquo;s very good at what he does—but that&rsquo;s how it starts. The diner owner gets cancer and wants to pass on the gift of the utterly unexplained time-tunnel. Along with it, he wants also to pass on his obsession with traveling back in time to (A) prove that Lee Harvey Oswald was the one who killed JFK and (B) stop him from doing so.</p>
<p>The time machine works very…slowly. It only goes back to a single point of time. So you can&rsquo;t a&#xfb00;ect anything in the past before that point and, in order to a&#xfb00;ect anything after that point, you have to wait. That is, you live in the past and make your changes as the opportunity arises in real-time. You have the advantage of knowing what&rsquo;s going to happen but the disadvantage that history is working against you to maintain the integrity of what has already been.</p>
<p>You can&rsquo;t look at this device too closely or it all falls apart logically, but that actually doesn&rsquo;t matter. King makes time itself into the monster of the story. That, along with the frailty, pettiness and utter banality of man, the complete unpredictability of things and the utter hopelessness of trying to outsmart coincidence.</p>
<p>Overall, I liked both the story and King&rsquo;s very restrictive take on time travel. Recommended.</p>
</div></dd>
<dt class="field"><span id="Billionaires">Billionaires and Bandits (2012)</span></dt>
<dd><div class=" "><p>by <em>Greg Palast</em><br>
This is a very important book by one of America&rsquo;s best journalists. He&rsquo;s worked for the BBC for over a decade because he can&rsquo;t &#xfb01;nd a steady job in the American media. The book is about U.S. presidential elections, from 2000–2012. It has an introduction by Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. who&rsquo;s worked with Palast for years on election fraud. As an added bonus, the book includes a bunch of cartoons by Ted Rall. To catch Palast&rsquo;s latest missives, he&rsquo;s recently become an (ir)regular correspondent for the <a href="http://www.thisishell.com/">This is Hell!</a> radio show on WNUR. Palast&rsquo;s style is ordinarily quite bombastic—in the classic, muckraker style—but his facts, research and journalism are quite solid. In this book, I felt he was even more reserved and serious than usual, lending gravitas to his treatment of this very serious subject. U.S. elections are soaked in money and fraud and the U.S. is really only a democracy in name, with voter purges and vote-blocking the norm for the &ldquo;wrong&rdquo; kind of people. Highly recommended.</p>
</div></dd>
<dt class="field"><span id="Uniqueness">Uniqueness and Reference Immutability for Safe Parallelism (Extended Version) (2012)</span></dt>
<dd><div class=" "><p>by <em>Colin S. Gordon, Matthew J. Parkinson, Jared Parsons, Aleks Brom&#xfb01;eld, Joe Du&#xfb00;y</em></p>
<p>See <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=2784">A provably safe parallel language extension for C#</a> (<cite><a href="http://www.earthli.com/">earthli.com</a></cite>) for a detailed write-up.</p>
</div></dd>
<dt class="field"><span id="Talk">Talk to the Hand (2005)</span></dt>
<dd><div class=" "><p>by <em>Lynne Truss</em></p>
<p>Sub-titled as &ldquo;The Utter Bloody Rudeness of Everyday Life (or six good reasons to stay home and bolt the door)&rdquo;, this book is in almost no way related to her &#xfb01;rst book <em>Eats, shoots and leaves</em>. The book is well-written, moderately funny and addresses most of the typical aspects of modern rudeness (e.g. cell phones, insularity, privacy in public, etc.) with a certain degree of nuance if not always a tremendous amount of originality. A fun, short read that will have some swinging their triumphant &#xfb01;sts in the air as Ms. Truss lays waste to all the rudeness of modern life.</p>
</div></dd>
<dt class="field"><span id="half-made">The Half-made World (2010)</span></dt>
<dd><div class=" "><p>by <em>Felix Gilman</em><br>
The authors of the site <a href="http://crookedtimber.org/">Crooked Timber</a> recommended this book unequivocally. It&rsquo;s a fantasy/western novel set in a half-made world, which means that the further west one goes, the less-made the world is. The laws of physics apply less, events are less predictable and the war between the Guns and the Line blurs. The Guns are soldiers in possession of haunted/possessed unerring guns whose owners live in inter-dimensional lodges and provide their hosts with healing powers. They represent chaos, they hardly ever hold territory but still they &#xfb01;ght for control over the lands of the line.</p>
<p>The agents of the Line are sullen little homunculi who are both pale and dark at the same time. They overwhelm with numbers and technology, the gigantic train engines that are their evil masters providing them with power and smoke- and noise-belching engines of destruction and conquering. The eastern lands are more civilized and resemble olden Europe. It is from this part of the world that Lysvet starts her journey and eventually meets up with Gun John Creedmore, a wonderful character.</p>
<p>It&rsquo;s de&#xfb01;nitely unique for a fantasy novel, possessing almost none of the standard fantasy elements (swords, wizards, etc.) I liked it very much, enough to read the follow-up novel (see below).</p>
</div></dd>
<dt class="field"><span id="Stadt">Die Stadt am Ende der Zeit (2008) (de)</span></dt>
<dd><div class=" "><p>by <em>Greg Bear</em></p>
<p>Though there are hard science-&#xfb01;ction elements as in so many of Greg Bear&rsquo;s books, the scope and breadth of this one is over such an extensive sweep of history—hundreds of billions of years—that the technology becomes indistinguishable from magic. It has just as many fantasy and horror elements as SF ones. Though there is some theorizing—he binds in quantum theory, the idea of the observer, number theory and information theory—the story is much more a horror/fantasy novel in the vein of Clive Barker, or perhaps Stephen King.</p>
<p>Instead of a universe that expands to heat death, he posits one where the intelligent races manage to extend the universe&rsquo;s life beyond its initially prophesied death, a period of near-stasis called the trillenium (because it lasts hundreds of billions of years). As you can expect with such extents of time, humans become all-but-immortal, some of them transforming themselves into virtual matter or, for all practical purposes, pure thought. This novel heads in the same direction as the novels of Greg Egan, like Schild&rsquo;s Ladder or Diaspora. With so much history—and so much time—the memory of it all can&rsquo;t be stored, it can&rsquo;t be remembered.</p>
<p>Much is forgotten, much is learned, and then the age-old forces of the universe come into play. There are names for them, abstractions taken from ancient mythical pantheons—mainly Greek and Indian. Brahma, responsible for creation, is sleeping during the trillenium; Mnemosyne, responsible for weaving the past to the present, is despondent and neglects her duties. Her alter-ego, the Chalk Princess, consumes souls for her master, the Typhon, master of the Chaos.</p>
<p>At the end of billions of years, the Chaos takes over, burning away the universe that mankind has known, building gigantic slag heaps of civilizations, with chunks of time and space thrown together into mind-bending patterns. The men of the future—Polybiblios, the Librarian, in particular—hatch a plan to save the universe, or at least to control how the universe will be born and how the intelligence and knowledge of the previous one can make its way to the next.</p>
<p>Glaucous and Whitlow are hunters of the possessors of the stones, summing machines that can control world lines and steer the universe onto the right path. There are four stones and three shepherds of them—Daniel, Ginny and Jack—who use their special powers to jump between worldlines and seek out the one with the best chance of succeeding. In the end, there are two lines left.</p>
<p>Ginny and Jack are somehow bound to their counterparts, Tiadba and Jebrassy, respectively, who are fabricated beings of the &ldquo;old kind&rdquo; who live in the Kalpa—the city at the end of time. They were created to journey into the Chaos to try to reach a long-sundered city, Nataraja, where they will &#xfb01;nd Sangmer and Ishanaxade.</p>
<p>As the universe comes to a close, the Chaos eats up pieces of the past, making it as it had never happened. The remaining world-lines and histories collapse together, &#xfb01;lling the space. At the end, the city at the end of time collides with 21st-century Seattle, bringing Ginny, Jack, Daniel and Glaucous to the Chaos that surrounds the Kalba—and closer to Jebrassy (who is accompanied by an Epitome/copy of (parts of) the Librarian as well as his teacher Ghentun) and Tiadba (who is the leader of a group of other marchers, seekers of the lost city).</p>
<p>The earthlings make their way, under the protection of their summing stones, to the center of the Chaos—insofar as distance and time have any meaning at all. As the end nears, as the decision-point comes closer, the Typhon, in his desperation, shrinks the Chaos further, funneling all the participants to Nataraja. As the universe is crushed/falls apart, memory and the past disappear—remembering becomes a way of &#xfb01;ghting the Chaos (as books, which are stored memories, patterns, non-irrational data, do).</p>
<p>And then there is Bidewell, and Ellen and her book-club members. And the books and the libraries and the information and number theory. How to distinguish between describable and indescribable? Between possible and impossible? How to remember so much history, so many interactions of particles? Does everything come only from a single Big Bang? Or is matter and energy created constantly, feeding a hungry universe aching to live beyond a few billions of years?</p>
<p>And then there are the cats, navigating the Chaos. All of these elements seem to be myths that Bear has invented or integrated in order to put a familiar face on what are the extraordinary and ine&#xfb00;able forces that drive the universe, all the more so at its beginning or end. The birth and rebirth of universes, the interplay of forces at play under ephemeral rules—such as those of the picoseconds after the Big Bang—are represented as people and Gods and love and other more prosaic incarnations more easily understood and described than particles and energies.</p>
<p>This ebb and &#xfb02;ow over trillenia is represented as Sangmer being cast out from Mnemosyne/Ishanaxade and, while she weaves the history and memory of the universe, he makes his pilgrim&rsquo;s journey, alone, to return to her at the end, where they can be together for a few, comparably short, moments, until the whole cycle begins again. The cats killing the king of Chaos Typhon is also clearly a metaphor of some kind, for some otherwise-incomprehensible process of early creation or dissolution. In many ways, this story reminded me of other creation stories, like Tolkien&rsquo;s story of the four Ages, where Typhon is Melkor, the silent ones are the orcs, twisted caricatures of the true creations of Brahma/Ilúvatar.</p>
<p>As you can probably tell, it&rsquo;s a di&#xfb03;cult book to describe. The scope is sweeping, the language is evocative (e.g. the Watchers from the Valley of the Dead Gods witness the end of creation) and the execution is mostly pretty captivating, though it got a bit repetitive at times. This is natural in a story that explores so much new territory and tries to describe time and space when it&rsquo;s all twisted up by unimaginable powers, by humans who have evolved to nearly unimaginable places.</p>
</div></dd>
<dt class="field">Marvel Universe vs. The Avengers/Wolverine/The Punisher (2012)</dt>
<dd><div class=" "><p>These are basically zombie storylines, in which everyone and everything—except for a select few—turns into a zombie and thirsts for blood. The Hulk, in particular, is a formidable zombie, if you can imagine such a thing. Much fun is had by all and the storytelling is a bit uneven. Spoiler alert: the Punisher wins in the end, because he&rsquo;s awesome.</p>
</div></dd>
<dt class="field">Old Man Logan (2008–2009)</dt>
<dd><div class=" "><p>This is a set of comic books set 50 years in the future, at a time when all super-villains had banded together to eliminate super-heroes. Obviously, Wolverine stars as &ldquo;Old Man Logan&rdquo; and he reluctantly gets dragged back into business of being a super-hero after the Hulk clan wipes out his family. The story wasn&rsquo;t all too inspiring, but it had its moments.</p>
</div></dd>
<dt class="field">Civil War (2006–2007)</dt>
<dd><div class=" "><p>In which Tony Stark proves once again that there is nothing so self-righteous and self-assured as a dry drunk. The most annoying thing is the immensely prominent role played in this series by Tony Stark/Iron Man and the degree to which technology solves absolutely <em>everything</em>. Comics these days rely on technology as a deus ex machina whenever they need it. And I don&rsquo;t know if I just never noticed, but holy crap are comic books <em>chatty</em> these days. They explain everything in some of the books. Some are still ok, showing rather than telling, but some are utterly pedantic in the amount of reading they (try to) make you do. </p>
<p>The business angle, with Richards and Stark bene&#xfb01;ting massively from the war is nicely done, though. Also cool is how Captain America is happy to use The Punisher until Castle kills some super-villains that Cap wanted to use, after which Cap acts all surprised and kicks him to the curb. The end was kind of disappointing, with a whimper rather than a bang, with Reed Richards appearing as orders of magnitude smarter than anyone else in the world. It got me thinking a bit that it would be impossible for someone of lesser intelligence or experience to be able to properly determine whether he&rsquo;s actually right or whether he&rsquo;s just deluded and hoodwinked. </p>
<p>And that, maybe, that&rsquo;s the situation in which the strongly religious &#xfb01;nd themselves in. They ask for proof, it is provided, but it doesn&rsquo;t &#xfb01;t their logic—it isn&rsquo;t rational according to them—so they reject it. Are they right or wrong to do so? Are we in the same position when a much more intelligent being tells us that psychohistory has foretold that the horri&#xfb01;c, fascist and unjust way he is proposing is the best? When we answer that it is impossible to predict such a thing with any degree of accuracy, he shakes his head because he knows that <em>it is possible</em>. But is he deluded? Fooled as so many have been before him? Or are we ignorant, not believing the voice of science and reason because it is beyond our comprehension? To what degree are we obligated to follow reason that we don&rsquo;t understand? Is there any way out of the trap of the Philosopher Kings?</p>
<p>Comics, at least those from Marvel, are too technocratic for my tastes, nor do they put much e&#xfb00;ort into consistency or moderation. There are all too many characters with omnipotence or omniscience although they still &#xfb01;ght like boxers. The books extol the glories of the super-rich, super-intelligent, super-strong, super-handsome—yuck. It&rsquo;s fun for a bit, but too much, too cloying, too easy. Technology surrounds the world in a warm cocoon, obviating any need to understand society or humanity. It&rsquo;s the American dream, I guess. Oh, yeah, and America&rsquo;s pretty much in charge of everything in these books, so that was pretty imaginative.</p>
</div></dd>
<dt class="field"><span id="Alchemist">The Alchemist (1992) (en/original in Portuguese in 1988)</span></dt>
<dd><div class=" "><p>by <em>Paulo Coelho</em></p>
<p>Touted as an international bestseller, I&rsquo;d never heard of it or him, but it&rsquo;s pretty short and I didn&rsquo;t read far enough into the blurb on the back to learn that it is supposedly <span class="quote-inline">&ldquo;a transforming novel about the essential wisdom of listening to our hearts, leaning to read the omens strewn along life&rsquo;s path and above all following our dreams.&rdquo;</span> My mistake.</p>
<p>That&rsquo;s a bit optimistic, I would say. Granted, the book is <em>about</em> all of those things—literally and constantly, as I&rsquo;ll show with some citations below—but you don&rsquo;t really <em>learn</em> them, as such. Here are some samples from a conversation between the eponymist and the wandering boy, Santiago, from pages 135–136</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p><strong>Boy:</strong> My heart is a traitor, it doesn&rsquo;t want me to go on.<br>
<strong>Alchemist:</strong> That makes sense. Naturally, it&rsquo;s afraid that, in pursuing your dream, you might lose everything you&rsquo;ve won.<br>
<strong>Boy:</strong> Well, then, why should I listen to my heart?<br>
<strong>Alchemist:</strong> Because you will never again be able to keep it quiet. Even if you pretend not to have heard what it tells you, it will always be there inside you, repeating to you what you&rsquo;re thinking about life and about the world.<br>
<strong>Boy:</strong> You mean I should listen, even if it&rsquo;s treasonous?<br>
<strong>Alchemist:</strong> […] You will never be able to escape from your heart. So it&rsquo;s better to listen to what it has to say.</p>
<p>The boy continued to listen to his heart as they crossed the desert. […]</p>
<p><strong>Boy:</strong> Even though I complain sometimes, it&rsquo;s because I&rsquo;m the heart of a person, and people&rsquo;s hearts are that way.</p>
</div></blockquote><p>That&rsquo;s from <em>one page</em>. Sweet Christ, it reads like the &#xfb01;rst 50 pages of <em>Dianetics</em> that I managed to slog through before I decided that life was just too damned short.</p>
<p>We&rsquo;re not &#xfb01;nished. There&rsquo;s more. From pages 138–139 (yeah, that&rsquo;s right, just two pages later):</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p><strong>Boy:</strong> Why don&rsquo;t people&rsquo;s hearts tell them to continue to follow their dreams?<br>
<strong>Alchemist:</strong> Because that&rsquo;s what makes a heart su&#xfb00;er most, and hearts don&rsquo;t like to su&#xfb00;er.</p>
<p>From then on, the boy understood his heart. He asked it, please, never to stop speaking to him. […] That night, he told all of this to the alchemist. And the alchemist understood that the boy&rsquo;s heart had returned to the Soul of the World.</p>
<p>[…]</p>
<p><strong>Boy:</strong> Is that the one thing I still needed to know?<br>
<strong>Alchemist:</strong> No. What you still need to know is this: before a dream is realized, the Soul of the World tests everything that was learned along the way […]</p>
</div></blockquote><p>Heavy-handed and saccharine doesn&rsquo;t even begin to cover it. I have no idea where the metaphor ends and the literalism begins. I&rsquo;m not even going to bother checking how many months this thing spent on Oprah&rsquo;s best-seller list. Avoid this book.</p>
</div></dd>
<dt class="field"><span id="Gatsby">The Great Gatsby (1926)</span></dt>
<dd><div class=" "><p>by <em>F. Scott Fitzgerald</em></p>
<p>I read this story for the second time and it really is very well-written—in a way that you rarely &#xfb01;nd these days anymore. Since most people have probably seen the movie by now (I didn&rsquo;t, so I have no idea whether it followed the book or not). I collected a few quotes that appealed to me.</p>
<p>I like this one because the book was written almost 100 years ago and the American passion for super&#xfb01;cial freedom while rejoicing in shackles was already well-established by then.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 86</div><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;There was nothing to look at from under the tree except Gatsby&rsquo;s enormous house, so I stared at it, like Kant at his church steeple, for half an hour. A brewer had built it early in the &lsquo;period&rsquo; craze, a decade before, and there was a story that he&rsquo;d agreed to pay &#xfb01;ve years&rsquo; taxes on all the neighbouring cottages if the owners would have their roofs thatched with straw. Perhaps their refusal took the heat out of his plan to Found a Family – he went into immediate decline. His children sold his house with the black wreath still on the door. <strong>Americans, while willing, even eager, to be serfs, have always been obstinate about being peasantry.</strong> (Emphasis added.)&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div></div><p>This next one expresses the idea of the subjectivity of reality very nicely and the e&#xfb00;ort and energy we put in to maintaining our illusions. </p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 100–101</div><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Or perhaps I had merely grown used to it, grown to accept West Egg as a world complete in itself, with its own standards and its own great &#xfb01;gures, second to nothing because it had no consciousness of being so, and now I was looking at it again, through Daisy&rsquo;s eyes. It is invariably saddening to look through new eyes at things upon which you have expended your own powers of adjustment.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div></div><p>This is a very nice exchange between two people who are only partially of Daisy&rsquo;s world. This book is about class, as so many books are, and it&rsquo;s about class that would come crashing down just four years later. It is, 90 years later about a class that has always existed in America and that has grown more and more powerful, so powerful that even a crash couldn&rsquo;t topple them this time. Like a hurricane, they just absorbed the power of the 2008 crash and became more powerful.</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;[Daisy]&rsquo;s got an indiscreet voice,&lsquo; I remarked. &lsquo;It&rsquo;s full of –&rsquo; I hesitated.</p>
<p>&ldquo;&lsquo;Her voice is full of money,&rsquo; [Gatsby] said suddenly.</p>
<p>&ldquo;That was it. I&rsquo;d never understood before. It was full of money – that was the inexhaustible charm that rose and fell in it, the jingle of it, the cymbals&rsquo; song of it…&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote><p>This is a nicely painted scene of a person gaining reassurance from the presence of another person. Just beautifully written, it stands alone, even separated from the original text. I like the last line even better than the very famous &#xfb01;nal sentence of the book.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 129</div><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;Thirty – the promise of a decade of loneliness, a thinning list of single men to know, a thinning brief-case of enthusiasm, thinning hair. But there was Jordan beside me, who, unlike Daisy, was too wise ever to carry well-forgotten dreams from age to age. As we passed over the dark bridge her wan face fell lazily against my coat&rsquo;s shoulder and the formidable stroke of thirty died away with the reassuring pressure of her hand.</p>
<p>&ldquo;<strong>So we drove on toward death through the cooling twilight.</strong> (Emphasis added.)&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div></div><p>Another beautiful comment on the masters of the world with which we are still saddled. The story evokes the same careless disgust with the old, moneyed classes, the nobility, as <em>Anna Karenina</em>. Gatsby is Vronsky and Daisy Anna.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 170</div><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;I couldn&rsquo;t forgive [Tom] or like him, but I saw that what he had done was, to him, entirely justi&#xfb01;ed. It was all very careless and confused. They were careless people, Tom and Daisy – they smashed up things and creatures and then retreated back into their money or their vast carelessness, or whatever it was that kept them together, and let other people clean up the mess they had made…</p>
<p>&ldquo;I shook hands with him; it seemed silly not to, for I felt suddenly as though I were talking to a child.&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div></div><p>The book is at once a paean to American exceptionalism and an indictment of the rapacity and unnatural hard-heartedness of the American way of life.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 171</div><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;And as the moon rose higher the inessential houses began to melt away until gradually I became aware of the old island here that &#xfb02;owered once for Dutch sailors&rsquo; eyes – a fresh, green breast of the new world. Its vanished trees, the trees that had made way for Gatsby&rsquo;s house, had once pandered in whispers to the last and greatest of all human dreams; for a transitory enchanted moment man must have held his breath in the presence of this continent, compelled into an aesthetic contemplation he neither understood nor desired, face to face for the last time in history with something commensurate to his capacity for wonder.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div></div><p>Just lovely. An eminently readable American classic.</p>
</div></dd>
<dt class="field"><span id="next">The Next 100 Years (2009)</span></dt>
<dd><div class=" "><p>by <em>George Friedman</em></p>
<p>See <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=2840">The Next 100 Years (2009) by <em>George Friedman</em></a> (<cite><a href="http://www.earthli.com/">earthli.com</a></cite>) for a detailed write-up.</p>
</div></dd>
<dt class="field"><span id="Common">Common Sense (1776)</span></dt>
<dd><div class=" "><p>by <em>Thomas Paine</em></p>
<p>This is one of the foundational documents of the American revolution and at least the &#xfb01;rst several of its 55 pages are extremely well-written and express a savage wit.</p>
<p>Imagine my delight when this book started o&#xfb00; with the following paragraph, a sentiment that has stood the test of time, for it succinctly describes the human condition.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 1</div><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Perhaps the sentiments contained in the following pages, are not YET su&#xfb03;ciently fashionable to procure them general favour; a long habit of not thinking a thing WRONG, gives it a super&#xfb01;cial appearance of being RIGHT, and raises at &#xfb01;rst a formidable outcry in defense of custom. But the tumult soon subsides. Time makes more converts than reason.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div></div><p>A little while later there he eloquently expresses why we must have a government, even though we&rsquo;d rather do without one.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 2</div><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Society in every state is a blessing, <strong>but government even in its best state is but a necessary evil</strong>; in its worst state an intolerable one; for when we su&#xfb00;er, or are exposed to the same miseries BY A GOVERNMENT, which we might expect in a country WITHOUT GOVERNMENT, <strong>our calamity is heightened by re&#xfb02;ecting that we furnish the means by which we su&#xfb00;er.</strong> […] For were the impulses of conscience clear, uniform, and irresistibly obeyed, man would need no other lawgiver; but that not being the case, <strong>he &#xfb01;nds it necessary to surrender up a part of his property to furnish means for the protection of the rest;</strong> and this he is induced to do by the same prudence which in every other case advises him <strong>out of two evils to choose the least.</strong>&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div></div><p>And in the following quote lies the rub, for freedom and security have easy and thus facile de&#xfb01;nitions but are, in truth, almost in&#xfb01;nitely malleable.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 5</div><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Here then is the origin and rise of government; namely, a mode rendered necessary by the inability of moral virtue to govern the world; here too is the design and end of government, viz. freedom and security.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div></div><p>If Thomas Paine were alive today, he would probably hate the strict constructionists (e.g. Scalia) who love him so very much. Here is is his take on the English constitution; he would likely feel the same way about the now-ancient American one.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 6</div><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;[…] I o&#xfb00;er a few remarks on the so much boasted constitution of England. That it was noble for the dark and slavish times in which it was erected, is granted. When the world was overrun with tyranny the least remove therefrom was a glorious rescue. But that it is imperfect, subject to convulsions, and incapable of producing what it seems to promise, is easily demonstrated.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div></div><p>Here are more speci&#xfb01;cs about the English constitution, comments that apply equally well to the American government today.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 6</div><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Absolute governments (tho&rsquo; the disgrace of human nature) have this advantage with them, that they are simple; if the people su&#xfb00;er, they know the head from which their su&#xfb00;ering springs, know likewise the remedy, and are not bewildered by a variety of causes and cures. But the constitution of England is so exceedingly complex, that the nation may su&#xfb00;er for years together without being able to discover in which part the fault lies; some will say in one and some in another, and every political physician will advise a di&#xfb00;erent medicine.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div></div><p>This two-hundred-year old summary of monarchy cannot be improved on. It applies equally well to non-monarchies, to elected representatives of a republic, for example.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 7</div><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;There is something exceedingly ridiculous in the composition of monarchy; it &#xfb01;rst excludes a man from the means of information, yet empowers him to act in cases where the highest judgment is required. The state of a king shuts him from the world, yet the business of a king requires him to know it thoroughly; […]&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div></div><p>Things get a bit thinner after this, with only a few more items of interest. Unlike his modern-day proponents, he didn&rsquo;t care about the debt.</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The debt we may contract doth not deserve our regard, if the work be but accomplished. No nation ought to be without a debt. A national debt is a national bond; and when it bears no interest, is in no case a grievance.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>Here&rsquo;s the self-su&#xfb03;ciency argument, when it was still true. However, this kind of resource-independence equals no trade and no sympathy, which echoes the policies of today.</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;No country on the globe is so happily situated, or so internally capable of raising a &#xfb02;eet as America. Tar, timber, iron, and cordage are her natural produce. We need go abroad for nothing.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>And here, we have an argument for hard cash and building a navy. I wonder if modern-day throwbacks like George Friedman (author of <em>The Next Hundred Years</em>) are fans of Thomas Paine?</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;Let us build; if we want them not, we can sell; and by that means replace our paper currency with ready gold and silver.</p>
<p>&ldquo;[…]</p>
<p>&ldquo;The Terrible privateer, Captain Death, stood the hottest engagement of any ship last war, yet had not twenty sailors on board, though her complement of men was upwards of two hundred. A few able and social sailors will soon instruct a su&#xfb03;cient number of active landmen in the common work of a ship.&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div></dd>
<dt class="field"><span id="Castle">We Have Always Lived in the Castle (1962)</span></dt>
<dd><div class=" "><p>by <em>Shirley Jackson</em></p>
<p>A strange little story about two girls ostracized by their village for being members of a strange family. Once their parents die, they get even stranger but life continues. Jackson is a superlative author—she&rsquo;s most famous for having written <em>The Lottery</em>—and has a very eerie sensibility I &#xfb01;nd mesmerizing.<br>
&nbsp;</p>
</div></dd>
<dt class="field"><span id="Owls">Let&rsquo;s Explore Diabetes with Owls (2013)</span></dt>
<dd><div class=" "><p>by <em>David Sedaris</em></p>
<p>Another collection of witty tales by the closest thing America has to a wit like Mark Twain. Sedaris doesn&rsquo;t have deal with matters quite as weighty as those dealt with by Twain, but his stories are still lots of fun. I read a bunch of this book out loud to Kath.</p>
</div></dd>
<dt class="field"><span id="Ransom">The Rise of Ransom City (2013)</span></dt>
<dd><div class=" "><p>by <em>Felix Gilman</em></p>
<p>This sequel to the <em>The Half-made World</em> continues the story of the West through the autobiography of inventor Harry Ransom. John Creedmore and Liv make an appearance, but don&rsquo;t star in this one. It&rsquo;s still quite entertaining reading a story in the lush and interesting world of the Guns and the Line.</p>
<p>The article <a href="http://crookedtimber.org/2013/05/10/stories-behind-stories/">Stories Behind Stories</a> by <cite>Henry</cite> (<cite><a href="http://crookedtimber.org/">Crooked Timber</a></cite>) had some interesting ideas on the book.</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;It’s a wonderful de&#xfb02;ationary moment – and is the moment at which the reader realizes that there’s another story, around which the imaginary world could be pivoted like an axis, to reveal an entirely di&#xfb00;erent understanding of what has been going on over the course of the two books.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>And isn&rsquo;t that how all of life is? With each ego picturing itself as the center of a story, when far greater things are afoot? From the smaller context, it appears much di&#xfb00;erently, and which is more important or more correct is a matter of perspective, in all but the most provable of matters.</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;I contend that this shouldn’t be read as a statement that the Folk are alien in some deep sense, but rather, a statement of epistemological and cultural modesty. That all that a white British emigre can plausibly claim to represent or truly understand, are those bits of the culture closely related to the one that he himself grew up in. To talk on behalf of the other is to take liberties that he isn’t entitled to take – so all he can do is to acknowledge that they are genuinely di&#xfb00;erent, that they have their own story, and that it is not only a valid one, but plausibly a better and more important one than the stories that he can tell.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div></dd>
<dt class="field"><span id="Flood">Flood (2008)</span></dt>
<dd><div class=" "><p>by <em>Stephen Baxter</em></p>
<p>This is a hard science-&#xfb01;ction novel about the e&#xfb00;ects of massive &#xfb02;ooding of the Earth&rsquo;s surface, up to hundreds, if not thousands of meters. Baxter is in his element in a well-researched and utterly plausible novel about &#xfb02;ooding, inundation, refugees and the precipitous shrinking of landmass and condensation of mankind to the high ground. Do not read this novel for any subtle philosophical treatise on the necessity of going on or any such deeper insight, as the book is entirely bereft of such topics.</p>
<p>Also, do not expect any subtlety in characterizations or dialogue, as that is also not Baxter&rsquo;s strong suit. His characters are not subtle and it was impossible for me to &#xfb01;nd a hero anywhere in the book, littered as it was with military types and libertarians. As usual, Baxter also focuses inordinately on the survival of his cadre of characters, dragging them ever onward as his narrators with one <em>deus ex machina</em> after another. As mentioned earlier, the utterly shallow philosophies of all involved prevent any of the real soul-searching that would likely follow such a cataclysmic event. Instead, characters are focused laser-like on saving utterly useless and sponging family members and wasting resources, while  pretending that nothing has changed.</p>
<p>In fact, it&rsquo;s like so many other books in the escapist genre, in that it essentially follows the lives of ersatz royalty, around whom the world inexplicably revolves. Where things fall apart is when these people aren&rsquo;t even especially admirable or interesting in any way and we are expected to root for them, well, because the author clearly would like us to. The end-goal of the main plotline in the book is help one young lady survive, but she&rsquo;s utterly unremarkable in every way, almost devoid of personality. Why should we care? Because the scheming now-old ladies in the book—royalty themselves—have chosen this as their goal, morally abhorrent as it is to prefer the survival of one over the well-being of many?</p>
<p>Once you realize that these are his devices, you can settle back and enjoy the splendor of his world in ruin, which he really does depict well. He&rsquo;s quite gifted as far as that goes. If you&rsquo;re a fan of disaster novels and hard sci-&#xfb01;, then this one is still highly recommended, despite the at times aggravating plot &amp; characters.</p>
</div></dd>
<dt class="field"><span id="Main">Main Street (1920)</span></dt>
<dd><div class=" "><p>by <em>Sinclair Lewis</em></p>
<p>A well-told tale of late 19th-/early 20th-century, small-town, American life as seen through the eyes of the narrator, a well-educated young woman with her own job, her own life and most decidedly her own views. While the people of the town of <em>Gopher Prairie</em> unquestioningly accept and further promulgate the tenets that underpinned American society at that time, Carol rebels and tries to change the town she deems ugly. Though her distaste for the town begins with its appearance, it is quickly transferred metaphorically to many of its inhabitants.</p>
<p>I found myself wondering to what degree Carol&rsquo;s stranger-in-a-strange-land story would resonate with people of other generations. This is an older book, but the writing and themes seemed, at times, quite modern, almost timeless.</p>
</div></dd>
<dt class="field"><span id="Doctor">Doctor Sleep (2013)</span></dt>
<dd><div class=" "><p>by <em>Stephen King</em></p>
<p>King returns to the world of <em>The Shining</em> with this novel about Daniel Torrance, the gifted young boy who emerged from the ashes of the Overlook Hotel with a shattered mother, an incinerated father and a closet full of ghosts and psychic trauma. We return to his life thread to &#xfb01;nd him as an itinerant alcoholic who has just hit bottom. King&rsquo;s powers of description and mastery of the language are on full display here. Though the story is not 100% unique—he&rsquo;s written over 50 books about the evil that lurks at the thin places between this world and the chaos that lies just beyond—but the characters are at once surprisingly fresh and comfortingly familiar.</p>
<p>As a long-time King reader, I got the impression that I was watching a concert by a favorite rock band or perhaps a <em>conductor of an orchestra</em> who&rsquo;s still at the top of his game and is—seemingly without e&#xfb00;ort—capable of delivering exactly the experience I was seeking. I felt like I was reading the best Stephen King book I&rsquo;d read in years; it was that deeply satisfying. I have no idea whether this is objectively true or whether my opinion will change over time, but that is the experience I had both while and shortly after reading <em>Doctor Sleep</em>. </p>
<p>If I have any complaints, it&rsquo;s that perhaps a bit too much of King&rsquo;s basic niceness shines through (if you&rsquo;ll pardon the expression) in his heroes. Dan seems to accept all sorts of abuse with a zen-like calm. Whereas this imparts a certain wisdom to his character, it also made him seem, at times, a bit too much of a goody-goody pushover. There were times when he could have put others in their place without losing much in return.</p>
<p>The story follows Dan as he pieces together a life in New Hampshire, where he gets to know a young girl who shares his gift. In a separate story line, we also learn of a traveling band of ancient … <em>creatures</em> who also have an interest in people like Dan and his new friend. These story lines careen toward one another inexorably until they meet in a spectacular &#xfb01;nale, which also satisfyingly ties up a few other loose ends. Highly recommended.</p>
</div></dd>
</dl>      </div>
      </div>
        <div class="footer">
    <div class="footer-data"><div class="footer-links"><ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/contact.php" title="">Contact</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/support.php" title="">Support</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/privacy.php" title="">Privacy</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/rights.php" title="">Rights</a></li></ul></div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="copyright">Copyright (c) 1999-2026 earthli.com. All Rights Reserved.</div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="versions">Powered by <ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore/app_news.php">earthli News 3.7</a></li><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore" title="">earthli WebCore&trade; 3.7</a></li></ul></div></div>    </div>
      </div>
  </div>  </body>
</html>
]]>
  </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
      <title type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[The Next 100 Years (2009) by George Friedman]]>
  </title>
    <id>https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=2840</id>
    <link href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=2840"/>
    <updated>2013-08-11T21:31:56+02:00</updated>
    <author>
        <name type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[Marco von Ballmoos]]>
  </name>
      <uri>https://earthli.com/users/marco</uri>
    </author>
      <summary type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<blockquote class="quote abstract "><div>I was recently given the book <em>The Next 100 Years</em> (2009) by <em>George Friedman</em> by a friend. After the first few dozen pages, I&rsquo;d made so many quizzical notes that I had to look up the author, because I&rsquo;d never heard of him. It turns out that he&rsquo;s <span class="quote-inline">&ldquo;the founder, chief intelligence officer, financial... [<a class="complete-text-link" href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=2840">More</a>]&rdquo;</span></div></blockquote>]]>
  </summary>
      <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<html lang="en">
  <head>
    <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/themes/ice.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/fonts/raleway.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/core/medium.css">
  </head>
  <body>
<div class="style-controls">  <div class="page">
    <div class="page-body">
<div class="info-box-top">
<p>
Published by <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_user.php?name=marco" title="Marco von Ballmoos" class="visible">marco</a> on <span class="date-time">11. Aug 2013 21:31:56 (GMT-5)</span>
</p>
<p>
Updated by <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_user.php?name=marco" title="Marco von Ballmoos" class="visible">marco</a> on <span class="date-time">4. Feb 2016 17:53:18 (GMT-5)</span>
</p>
</div>
      <div class="text-flow wide">
  <blockquote class="quote abstract "><div>I was recently given the book <em>The Next 100 Years</em> (2009) by <em>George Friedman</em> by a friend. After the first few dozen pages, I&rsquo;d made so many quizzical notes that I had to look up the author, because I&rsquo;d never heard of him. It turns out that he&rsquo;s <span class="quote-inline">&ldquo;the founder, chief intelligence officer, financial overseer, and CEO of the private intelligence corporation STRATFOR, a global intelligence company founded in 1996&rdquo;</span>, according to <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/George_Friedman">Wikipedia</a>. That helped set the context for the book a bit better.</div></blockquote><p>There seems to be something about the having last name &ldquo;Friedman&rdquo; that leads someone to think that he is an authority on absolutely everything under the sun. [1] Not only that, but he sees no need to delve into the works of other authorities in the field before holding forth and tying everything in to a holistic &ldquo;this is the way the world works&rdquo; predictive scheme that kowtows to the way he wants the world to work. This involves, of course, ignoring a lot of history and a lot of science, research and philosophy to the say nothing of basic logic and rational reasoning.</p>
<p>The book is not very long for such a portentous title, weighing in at 273 lightweight pages. Large parts of the early chapters are filled with somewhat superficial regurgitations of U.S. textbook history that reads as if it was written by high-school junior trying desperately to copy something from Wikipedia without getting caught for plagiarism. I wondered while reading it whether Friedman had managed to write any other books because it seemed as if he&rsquo;d thrown in a reference to everything he&rsquo;d ever heard of or learned into this book. And it <em>still</em> didn&rsquo;t crack 300 pages.</p>
<p>When he does extemporize, Friedman isn&rsquo;t shy about holding forth on the topic of a woman&rsquo;s &ldquo;traditional&rdquo; role in society as well as what all of the world&rsquo;s major religions would like that role to be. These bold assertions serve as the base for a prediction that world population will actually <em>drop</em>. This treatment leads then seamlessly into interpretations on what Osama bin Laden <em>really</em> meant in his writings and then lurches into a lesson on how computers work, starting with <span class="quote-inline">&ldquo;[t]he computer is based on binary logic&rdquo;</span> and quickly working his way into describing ASCII encodings.</p>
<p>This, all without a single footnote or reference to any scholarly works or sources for any of his statistics. Is it possible that the human population will stabilize and perhaps even go down in the next 100 years? Sure it is, but not before it goes up to about 8 billion people and, more importantly, not before many of these people will want the same lifestyle that George Friedman himself, as the founder and CEO of Stratfor, has, complete with the extra energy and resource demands. All of this was not discussed at all, leaving his discussion purely in the realm of superficial and largely non-interesting speculation. He lets his readers assume that this population reduction will be good for humanity when, in all likelihood, it will either not happen or will happen as a result of catastrophic die-back.</p>
<p>As with many predictive books, you can read it one way or you can read it another. Turkey will rise to the level of a world power…or it won&rsquo;t. Russia will fall…unless it gains power first or loses it more slowly. Or whatever. The point is: the author will have been right. The only very consistently correct—in this author&rsquo;s humble opinion—prediction is that the U.S. will continue to be savage—barbaric, in his words—brutally unfair, pressing for every advantage with no thought for any principle other than <span class="quote-inline">&ldquo;he who dies with the most toys wins&rdquo;</span>. Friedman constantly treats the U.S. as an &ldquo;it&rdquo; looking out for itself without a thought for what its citizens may be able to bring about. He does this for all countries, and he has a sole emphasis on history as created by state actors: terrorism isn&rsquo;t mentioned as an influence at all (at least not in the first 170 pages).</p>
<p>Not only that, but climate change also has no influence on world policy for the first 30 or 40 years, either. Energy seems to be in great supply as well, with no explanation given (other than space-based microwave cannons, which themselves would have required only a minor up-front energy and materials investment, as hand-waved away by Friedman).</p>
<p>Instead of that, he places an inordinate amount of emphasis on not just military power, but specifically <em>maritime</em> military power. Oh, and <span class="quote-inline">&ldquo;develop[ing] significant capabilities in space&rdquo;</span> is something that many nations will do (Poland, Turkey, Japan, etc.) even though it&rsquo;s something that the up-and-coming power United States (according to Friedman) is incapable of doing right now (U.S. astronauts currently fly out of Kazakhstan).</p>
<p>And, I feel that this must repeated: though he claims that his <span class="quote-inline">&ldquo;book is not meant to be a celebration of the United States&rdquo;</span>, it is. It just is. Actions by the U.S. turns out to be advantages where the same actions by opponents are deadly missteps. America seems to win, no matter what. The world-spanning war he envisions is also just ludicrous. His hypothetical military actions are ubiquitous, strangely antiquated but also surgically clean, with large swaths of territory changing hands with almost no casualties.</p>
<p>Several times, he pauses to remind us that he&rsquo;s <span class="quote-inline">&ldquo;laying out logically&rdquo;</span> a very plausible future, but he&rsquo;s really just talking out of his ass. He copy/pasted a bunch of 20th-century history together, took his preconceived notions of how the world works and should continue to work and had at it, no footnotes, no references, no data. Nothing.</p>
<p>It is people, in general, that are missing from Friedman&rsquo;s book. There is no discussion of living conditions, advancements in social or human-centered technology, nothing about poverty, health care … nothing. His thoughts about the future are centered on military states. In the late 2060s, when <span class="quote-inline">&ldquo;America presides over a golden age of stability&rdquo;</span>, one can only presume that, not only are the people of the world kept on a short leash by the newly rebuilt Battlestars (the aforementioned microwave cannons—I am not kidding), but even the people of the U.S. are probably not doing so great (as e.g. now with stock market soaring but many people not working, underwater on homes, in prison or otherwise dying of poverty).</p>
<p>Not recommended.</p>
<h2>Notes</h2><p>I jotted down a few notes while I was skimming/reading the book.</p>
<ul>
<li><strong>Page 24:</strong> He seems utterly oblivious to irony when he says that China will fall because of a class divide engendered by people on the coast doing better than those in the middle of the country (hint: he might as well be describing the U.S. – why does it work for them?)</li>
<li><strong>Page 26:</strong> common sense is for pussies. Cool, no wonder there are no footnotes.</li>
<li><strong>Page 29:</strong> what about perestroika? What about Tuchman&rsquo;s many examples in her excellent <em>March to Folly?</em></li>
<li><strong>Page 31:</strong> How was the twentieth century a wholly European century, with only the last decade belonging to the U.S.? The U.S. owned a <em>majority</em> of the world in 1945 already. The U.S. is ascending only now? Really?</li>
<li><strong>Page 33:</strong> And there is it: global warming is an irrational fear. And, prediction of America&rsquo;s downfall was wrong once (in the 70s), ergo future similar predictions are also wrong. Q.E.D.</li>
<li><strong>Page 35:</strong> the biggest industry requires a lot of imported oil, but if that&rsquo;s gone, what happens to that industry? And how long will that soil remain arable? Aren&rsquo;t there a lot of problems already? How the hell is Alaska considered uninhabitable, but he says nothing about somewhere like Montana?</li>
<li><strong>Page 64:</strong> &ldquo;overdramatize?&rdquo; I imagine he refers to the wailing about lost American lives. Considering the amount of damage done to the rest of world per lost American soldier, it is absolutely correct to characterize our histrionics as overly dramatic. However, <em>millions</em> have been killed in these actions that he just dismisses, to say nothing of the lost opportunity costs of trillions of dollars wasted on <span class="quote-inline">&ldquo;confusing&rdquo;</span> the rest of the world and preventing it from getting organized. What a bizarre theory: it explains why it always looks like the U.S. is fucking up royally … it&rsquo;s all part of the plan.</li>
<li><strong>Page 67:</strong> Christ, that&rsquo;s deft (or daft?), turning the U.S. inability to win a war in any real sense into a string of &ldquo;actual&rdquo; victories by claiming that the intent was only ever to destabilize. And the myth that the entire Muslim world wants to establish a Caliphate is just taken as established, credible fact.</li>
<li><strong>Page 96:</strong> At the same time—on the same page—he exhorts us to <span class="quote-inline">&ldquo;expect the unexpected&rdquo;</span> but also that <span class="quote-inline">&ldquo;this is not the most likely&rdquo;</span> outcome. What the hell?</li>
<li><strong>Page 97:</strong> Iran is at fault for the U.S. obsession with it, of course. Iran will be perceived as being <span class="quote-inline">&ldquo;prematurely aggressive&rdquo;</span> and will have rightfully earned the baleful wrath of the U.S.</li>
<li><strong>Page 101:</strong> He constantly discusses population and labor force as seemingly purely fungible resources; he never mentions education, training or skill sets</li>
<li><strong>Page 130:</strong> Here he&rsquo;s unduly harsh on the paranoia of the Russians: they quite reasonably think in terms of having been constantly under threat or attack over the last 100 years. Look at the current European attitude toward them, which crosses the line into racism, even at the State level.</li>
<li><strong>Page 132:</strong> His analysis is based heavily on what feels like decades-old military strategy and tactics (e.g. focus on naval forces), ignoring—or not mentioning nearly as much—the much more prevalent economic strangulation and colonization. Already today, we have drones, cyber warfare, nuclear weapons (which he dismisses as not usable; why?) as well as all sorts of asymmetrical terrorist and guerrilla tactics. All of this is not discussed, favoring missile porn about hyper-rockets that travel at 10 times the speed of sound</li>
<li><strong>Page 138:</strong> His ideas about the mobility of labor have no basis in reality. He makes it sound like blue-collar labor forces just jump around, optimizing their incomes by location. There is no reason to believe that this will become easier (even were immigration restrictions reduced as per the mysterious &ldquo;population bust&rdquo; he posits).</li>
<li><strong>Page 145:</strong> Once again, he waves his hands and makes history happen with utterly unexplained forces</li>
<li><strong>Page 146:</strong> He casually mentions 401ks as a saving vehicle when, for many people, those had been literally decimated just a year before his book&rsquo;s publication. He also ignores the massive financialization of the U.S. economy, treating it instead as a GDP comprised primarily of industry and exports.</li>
<li><strong>Page 147:</strong> lots of bla, bla, but essentially boils down to very generously explaining how a large part of the U.S. economy (the financial part, at least) is based almost purely on fraud. He used far more words to get there, but I&rsquo;m sure he also has many, many friends that he is trying to avoid offending.</li>
<li><strong>Page 149:</strong> Here he talks about Social Security as if he&rsquo;s the first one to think about the baby boomers and as if the SSA has no actuarial division that perhaps anticipated it (i.e. he thinks we <em>have</em> to raise the retirement age, of course). Despite all of these problems, though, the U.S. will still <em>easily</em> come out on top in the world standings in the next century.</li>
<li><strong>Page 152:</strong> Here he posits a population slump in OECD countries, engendering a situation in which <span class="quote-inline">&ldquo;immigrants will certainly comparison-shop&rdquo;</span>. This would be a sea change indeed, but there is no factual argument made for this coming about, other than reverse population pressure. And, even given that, the vacuum of U.S. desire for labor doesn&rsquo;t making moving to another country any easier, really.</li>
<li>page 162–166: Purely old-school militarism with no mention made of the potential for nuclear war or other less conventional attacks. Just armies moving back and forth as they always have done.</li>
<li><strong>Page 167:</strong> <span class="quote-inline">&ldquo;[…] intensification of the crisis of confidence that has undermined France and Germany since World War I.&rdquo;</span> Really? Wasn&rsquo;t Germany just brimming with confidence somewhere in the middle there? Does anyone else recall something like that?</li>
<li><strong>Page 172:</strong> Is this some neocon fantasy? Instead of being on the rise and riding a resource boom, Russia disappears on its own? Again? Why does the U.S. get to ride a resource boom, but not Russia? Why does China implode due to class divides but not the U.S.? No reasons given, other than it makes the prediction more palatable to Stratfor&rsquo;s customers.</li>
<li><strong>Page 173:</strong> So, wait a minute, just a few pages ago, the U.S. had unparalleled economic and military power over the world, but still allows Japan to develop into a James-Bond–villain–like power? Methinks he&rsquo;s just getting a hard-on describing the awesome military hardware they will all have.</li>
<li><strong>Page 174:</strong> It&rsquo;s weird, because as the world develops, he keeps reaching back to the 20th century for patterns, envisioning ever-expanding, classic empires which would seem to require much more military personnel and <em>energy</em>. He makes no attempt to describe how this will all transpire and how energy budgets will work; instead, he just asserts that it will (work). And one large empire is threatening to break up (the EU)—what is the justification for believing that any other country would want to expand to more territory and leave itself even more exposed? There&rsquo;s more confusion here because, once the Turks have expanded far northward, they can then magically <span class="quote-inline">&ldquo;tell the U.S. [what] to do&rdquo;</span>? And Iraq will be <span class="quote-inline">&ldquo;torn apart by traditional internal conflicts&rdquo;</span> but this is more historical work than prediction, no? And he predicts that Iraq will somehow build up into something useful in 30 years but will then fall apart again because <span class="quote-inline">&ldquo;Russia withdraws support&rdquo;</span>? Wouldn&rsquo;t decades of U.S. sanctions and war be more to blame here? Or are we just going to look ahead and forget that all happened?</li>
<li><strong>Page 175:</strong> <span class="quote-inline">&ldquo;Force Israel into an accommodation.&rdquo;</span> Did he write that with a straight face? This has barely happened in the last 60 years and, with its major ally in nigh-unimaginable ascendancy (Friedman&rsquo;s prediction), it isn&rsquo;t likely to happen in the future either.</li>
<li><strong>Page 185:</strong> I call them <span class="quote-inline">&ldquo;Battlestars, for no other reason than that it&rsquo;s a cool name.&rdquo;</span> Yep, definitely getting a hard-on over military hardware.</li>
<li><strong>Page 186:</strong> Why would the <span class="quote-inline">&ldquo;Japanese be <em>alarmed</em> by Battlestars&rdquo;</span>? Following current trends in U.S. education and technical expertise, wouldn&rsquo;t the Japanese most likely have designed and built them? And would these plans not have been available online since pretty much the project inception? Or does the Internet no longer exist? Or perhaps Wikileaks gave up and went home?At any rate, The Japanese would have presumably kept a Battlestar for themselves. Or are we still assuming that, as in the 1960s, only Americans can build technology?</li>
<li><strong>Page 189:</strong> <span class="quote-inline">&ldquo;U.S. intelligence, of course, will pick up the diplomatic discussions […]&rdquo;</span> because, in forty years, we still won&rsquo;t be using encryption for anything so that the eavesdropping infrastructure continues to work just as well as it does today.</li>
<li><strong>Page 190:</strong> Apparently, he&rsquo;s going to ride the &ldquo;only Americans can design and build technology&rdquo; horse until it dies out from under him.</li>
<li><strong>Page 192:</strong> It&rsquo;s really getting a bit infuriating how he&rsquo;s so understanding that the U.S. considers any minuscule or barely potential threat to its hegemony as life-threatening and an <span class="quote-inline">&ldquo;offensive maneuver&rdquo;</span>. </li>
<li><strong>Page 200:</strong> bla, bla, bla, more war porn … <em>moon bases!</em> Moving on…</li>
<li><strong>Page 203:</strong> <span class="quote-inline">&ldquo;As we have seen, nuclear weapons are more frightening before they are used than after […]&rdquo;</span> I&rsquo;m not even sure how to respond to that. Is he sure about that? Japan has been pretty quiet, no? They used to be quite dedicated militarists and are now quite dedicated pacifists. They invented an entire film genre with plots dedicated almost <em>solely</em> to working through the angst engendered by Hiroshima and Nagasaki. That seems like a spectacularly insensitive and wildly inaccurate thing to write.</li>
<li><strong>Page 229:</strong> The massive, world-spanning war will cost only 50,000 lives in all. Naturally, collateral, second-order and third-order effects of such a war are not counted toward the body count. If people starve to death because a death ray wipes out their crops or power centers or clean water, that&rsquo;s their own fault, and is naturally not attributed to the war. The scenario he depicts would require so much <em>energy</em>; where does it all come from? It feels like Michael Bay helped him write that chapter.</li>
<li><strong>Page 233:</strong> Here he once again takes up those 50-year cycles of American history. He explained how American history can be roughly aligned—very roughly, because you can only use the official history and must ignore other significant events that don&rsquo;t line up so well—in 50-year blocks. He does not explain why this pattern is inescapable.</li>
<li><strong>Page 235–238:</strong> More tech porn, listing historical technologies and throwing in every technology he can think of. I&rsquo;m not sure what the purpose here was, though. Perhaps just padding to fill out the book a bit more.</li>
<li><strong>Page 245:</strong> Here he has a good 3-item list that describes how technology is developed (hint: the first step is publicly funded research at universities and grant programs, the second is publicly funded military development and the last step is private industry making money off it, for free). Nothing new to see here.</li></ul><p><hr></p>
<div class="footnote-reference"><span id="footnote_DRAFTABLE_ENTRY_2840_1_body" class="footnote-number">[1]</span> The other example of this foolishness is also its paragon: pundit Thomas Friedman of the <em>New York Times</em> and of <em>The World is Flat</em> fame.</div>      </div>
      </div>
        <div class="footer">
    <div class="footer-data"><div class="footer-links"><ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/contact.php" title="">Contact</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/support.php" title="">Support</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/privacy.php" title="">Privacy</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/rights.php" title="">Rights</a></li></ul></div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="copyright">Copyright (c) 1999-2026 earthli.com. All Rights Reserved.</div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="versions">Powered by <ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore/app_news.php">earthli News 3.7</a></li><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore" title="">earthli WebCore&trade; 3.7</a></li></ul></div></div>    </div>
      </div>
  </div>  </body>
</html>
]]>
  </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
      <title type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[Books read in 2012]]>
  </title>
    <id>https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=2607</id>
    <link href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=2607"/>
    <updated>2013-01-14T22:34:57+01:00</updated>
    <author>
        <name type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[Marco von Ballmoos]]>
  </name>
      <uri>https://earthli.com/users/marco</uri>
    </author>
      <summary type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<dl><dt class="field">Firstborn (2007)</dt>
<dd><div class=" "><p>by <em>Arthur C. Clarke &amp; Stephen Baxter</em></p>
<p>This is the final installment in the <em>Time Odyssey</em> trilogy (although the end of the book is quite a cliffhanger that indicates that Baxter is considering soldiering on on his own). The book incorporates almost every hard-science theme you can... [<a class="complete-text-link" href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=2607">More</a>]</p>
</div></dd>
</dl>]]>
  </summary>
      <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<html lang="en">
  <head>
    <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/themes/ice.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/fonts/raleway.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/core/medium.css">
  </head>
  <body>
<div class="style-controls">  <div class="page">
    <div class="page-body">
<div class="info-box-top">
<p>
Published by <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_user.php?name=marco" title="Marco von Ballmoos" class="visible">marco</a> on <span class="date-time">14. Jan 2013 22:34:57 (GMT-5)</span>
</p>
</div>
      <div class="text-flow wide">
  <dl><dt class="field">Firstborn (2007)</dt>
<dd><div class=" "><p>by <em>Arthur C. Clarke &amp; Stephen Baxter</em></p>
<p>This is the final installment in the <em>Time Odyssey</em> trilogy (although the end of the book is quite a cliffhanger that indicates that Baxter is considering soldiering on on his own). The book incorporates almost every hard-science theme you can imagine, flitting from topic to topic and seeming to hurry through the story. It&rsquo;s quite inconsistent in the way that they kept shuttling people all over the solar system when that&rsquo;s obviously such a costly operation. Instead of gelling nicely (as with the subsequent <em>Blindsight</em>, reviewed below), it comes off as a clumsy way of stringing <em>Deus Ex Machinae</em> together in order to bring the book to its conclusion. The story is good, but the storytelling is less than stellar (no pun intended). [1]</p>
</div></dd>
<dt class="field">Blindsight (2006)</dt>
<dd><div class=" "><p>by <em>Peter Watts</em></p>
<p>A novel ostensibly in the hard-science science-fiction genre, but with a lot of wholly believable extrapolation and written very, very nicely in a terse form that evokes much more than it says (similar to William Gibson). The story is one of a first encounter with an alien civilization for an Earth 50 years in the future. The rendezvous is far outside the Oort cloud and involves a group of highly-specialized and evolved geniuses, among them a captain who is a vampire (it&rsquo;s OK, it&rsquo;s actually pretty cool and well-explained). The alien being(s) turn(s) out to be quite alien and communication is not a simple affair. Lots of great dialogue, great scenery, great technology and discussions of interesting scientific, psychological, linguistic and philosophical principles. It&rsquo;s got everything but the kitchen sink in it, but it works. Highly recommended.</p>
</div></dd>
<dt class="field">zero history (2010)</dt>
<dd><div class=" "><p>by <em>William Gibson</em></p>
<p>Another story involving Hollis, Milgrim and Bigend, Gibson swerves even further into his obsession with branding (especially micro-branding) and the world of the very rich (none of the characters wants for anything really) and the way in which it interfaces with large-scale military, governmental and corporate organizations. It takes place in the modern-day (the teens of the 21st century) and Gibson&rsquo;s style still manages to convey just how outlandishly amazing and cool so much of the technology we have is. It&rsquo;s cool-hunting but done by cool characters in cool settings with very cool, terse dialogue and descriptions. Lovingly written and edited. The title alludes to an individual with no electronic history, no footprint in the digital world (Milgrim, in this case, whose drug habit pushed him off the grid for a decade). Highly recommended for fans of Gibson.</p>
</div></dd>
<dt class="field">Anna Karenina (1877)</dt>
<dd><div class=" "><p>by <em>Leo Tolstoy</em></p>
<p>A story of late nineteenth-century Russian aristocracy, interwoven with excursions into the philosophy of class, the divine and gender politics. The title character is hardly endearing, with a sense of entitlement shared by all of her class. They engender their own suffering, though their lives are absurdly easy by any standard. They suffer from first-world problems and complain about and are tortured endlessly by them. None of the characters has a visible source of income—save perhaps Levin, who lives in the country on an inherited estate and ostensibly farms it. The others are all almost consistently useless parasites and much of this is laid out descriptively in the book, leaving the reader to do the legwork in assuming that Tolstoy finds this sort of behavior and segmentation of society reprehensible (it&rsquo;s not clear, actually). Unclear as well is the attitude toward science, especially when contrasted with religion. Religion runs deep among the nobility, but the younger generations have pretenses of knowing better, Levin (who seems to be the closest in philosophy to the author) included.</p>
</div></dd>
<dt class="field">Dead Aid: Why aid is not working and how there is a better way for Africa (2009)</dt>
<dd><div class=" "><p>by <em>Dambisa Moyo</em></p>
<p>That the foreword is written by Niall Ferguson is already enough to raise suspicion. Said foreword is filled with effusive praise for a book that “prescribes…strong medicine” that reflects an “African view of Africa’s economic problems”. But Moyo&rsquo;s experience includes a stint at the World Bank, a Masters from Harvard, a Doctorate from Oxford and eight years with Goldman Sachs, all difficult to reconcile with an African experience. When Ms. Moyo was on the Colbert Report two years ago, she was underwhelming in her ability to defend or explain her thesis and the contents of the book bear out this lack of depth. It seems much more likely that she is feted because she’s young, pretty enough and is willing to say just what old white males want to say, but don’t dare to: namely, that Africa should suck it up and get on with generating the economic growth that its surfeit of resources and cheap labor have long promised. Not recommended.</p>
</div></dd>
<dt class="field">Patriots: A novel of survival in the coming collapse (1990-2009)</dt>
<dd><div class=" "><p>by <em>James Wesley, Rawles</em></p>
<p>A novel about &ldquo;Enders&rdquo;—über-Patriots with mad military skills, a strong predilection for the Bible, a clear notion of male/female hierarchy and a mentality that never left the early 20th-century. Add a buttload of guns and ammo—oh, sweet Lord, the ammo—and you&rsquo;ve got a recipe for a Galt&rsquo;s Gulch full of able-bodied people fending off hordes of moochers who can&rsquo;t care for themselves. The economy collapses because of hyper-inflation, which is a standard Tea-party bugaboo, but the scenario is completely laughable and could never happen. Not that financial collapse is not possible, but not like that. The author seemed quite taken with his own erudition, which from his point-of-view is probably galaxy-spanning rather than objectively severely limited and crude. The government is, of course, evil. The enders seem to be positively <em>delighted</em> that civilization crumbled—because they never really needed it anyway. People are slaughtered in this novel, but only really bad guys. Like terrorist/child-molesters (I&rsquo;m not kidding). There&rsquo;s not a lot of room for subtlety. Good to read one of these, but it&rsquo;s hard to recommend to others other than for anthropological purposes.</p>
</div></dd>
<dt class="field">Up the Line (1969)</dt>
<dd><div class=" "><p>by <em>Robert Silverberg</em></p>
<p>A wonderful time-travel book in the grand tradition, with lots of sex. The title refers to the expression used in the future for going into the past; going &ldquo;Down the line&rdquo; moves you to the future relative to your current time. The book clearly shows the year in which it was written, as there is a whole lot of free lovin&rsquo; going on in the future. Time travel has become commonplace enough that there are guided tours of the past&rsquo;s greatest moments. Tour groups resemble those that travel only through space (well, they travel through time as well, but rather at the same speed as everyone else and in the same direction, which is boring). The hero of the book becomes a tour guide in and around Constantinople and throughout the first millennium after Christ. Both the time-travel implications—can you meet yourself? What about loops? What if you sleep with an ancestor? How do you keep the continuum <em>clean</em>? What does that even mean? Are there multiple strands? Infinite strands?—and the history and culture of the various time periods are expertly presented. Pulcheria is a great character, especially after her foot-waggling fall. A fun and intriguing read; recommended.</p>
</div></dd>
<dt class="field">Roadmarks (1979)</dt>
<dd><div class=" "><p>by <em>Roger Zelazny</em></p>
<p>Another time-travel novel, also masterfully told. In this world, time is a road built by an ancient race of dragons (sounds cheesy, but the way it&rsquo;s described renders it unutterably cool). There are on- and off-ramps that certain members of diverse civilizations and races can access. Histories and futures that are more &ldquo;likely&rdquo; are well-kept whereas those that are less so become overgrown and ever-more-difficult to find. The story is of a gruff, ageless mercenary-type called Red Dorakeen who travels up and down the road, seeking a nebulous goal, accompanied by a portable, talking computer in the form of a book. He is beset by enemies unleashed on him by an arch-enemy who used to be a close friend. Supporting characters like the Marquis de Sade, Hitler and a couple of truly inspired assassins—the monk Timyin Tin is particularly cool—round out the cast. A fun and intriguing read; recommended.</p>
</div></dd>
<dt class="field">Full Dark, No Stars (2009–2010)</dt>
<dd><div class=" "><p>by <em>Stephen King</em></p>
<p>Four novellas, each dealing with marriage and male/female relationships in one way or another. One is a story of madness and desperate poverty in a marriage gone stale. What goes around comes around and ghosts are restless. Another is a fabulous story of revenge by a woman wronged, as only King can, replete with superhuman feats convincingly told. Then there is a deal-with-the-devil story but with a remorseless character instead of an eventually repentant one, happily screwing everyone around him as he gets just what he wants.  And, finally, there is the story of a wife who slowly discovers that the man she married is not the man she thought he was. A discovery made innocently leads her to unravel her last decades with him and question everything. Recommended for anyone, but highly recommended for fans.</p>
</div></dd>
<dt class="field">Loser Liberalism (2012)</dt>
<dd><div class=" "><p>by <em>Dean Baker</em></p>
<p>A concise, expertly-written and highly accessible novel describing the basics of macro-economics on a global level but primarily as it pertains to the U.S. The current economy is described in detail as well as the history that led to where we are now, including the repeal of various safeguards and the various crashes and recessions. Baker has been fighting the good fight for decades now and is not short of solutions, many of which are straightforward and easily implemented, if we would only stop worshiping wealth. Highly recommended for anyone.</p>
</div></dd>
<dt class="field">War and Peace (1869)</dt>
<dd><div class=" "><p>by <em>Leo Tolstoy</em></p>
<p>Where does one start in describing a 1300-page novel that follows 1220 pages of intricate detail of the lives of Russian nobles woven with step-by-step descriptions of 19th-century warfare with 80 pages of dense philosophy? The book tells the story of the invasion of Russia by Napoleon through the eyes of several noble families, the members of which undergo their own trials and tribulations. The characters are almost all unbelievably shallow, though one suspects deliberately so. I couldn&rsquo;t tell you that I&rsquo;d liked any of them. Pierre, Natasha, Nicholas Rostov, Andrew Oblonsky, Dolokhov, Denisov, Sonya, Boris, Julie, Mary, Helen, the list goes on. They all lived idle lives, lamenting their lack of purpose or reveling in their indolence. The main thrust of the novel is that war is useless and that the people to whom history ascribes greatness can be proven to have had nothing to do with the situations for which they have found themselves famous. History is not guided; it simply happens. Hard to recommend because of its sheer length, but Tolstoy is a master of prose and the translation I read was really, really good (I imagine).</p>
</div></dd>
<dt class="field">The Damage Done (1998)</dt>
<dd><div class=" "><p>by <em>Warren Fellows</em></p>
<p>The subtitle summarizes the book: <em>Twelve years of hell in a Bangkok prison</em>. Fellows freely admits that the first quarter-century of his life was sordid though not particularly so. He drifted into a life of minor crime, grafting and grifting in a minor way until he became a drug courier. He led a relatively charmed life for a few years (it&rsquo;s hard to tell how many) and then was busted in Thailand with a suitcase full of heroin. He was sent to a horrific Thai prison staffed by horrific sadists and endured there for over three years. The punishment far exceeds anything that can be considered civilized: no privacy, incredible overcrowding, disease, malnutrition, beatings and torture, isolation, darkness and, ironically, drugs and drugs and drugs to escape the everyday. It&rsquo;s amazing that anyone could survive so long (most don&rsquo;t). Once convicted, he eventually ended up in an even more notoriously horrific prison—<em>Bang Kwang</em> or &ldquo;Big Tiger&rdquo;—for nine more years. </p>
<p>Somewhat unevenly written, but the well-written parts are poetry and really evoke feelings of horror. Let the following passages serve as examples:</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The difficulty in telling this story—my whole story, in fact—is that there is no way for me to communicate duration of time to you. It may have taken a minute for you to have read of my position in this punishment cell, but I was in this position for a whole month. How do I convey that to you? There are no markers with which I can measure. The only way for you to come close to experiencing this is to read the previous paragraph over and over, every minute of every day, for a whole month. But nobody could do that without going mad with frustration.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;I was walking down the road to the front gate, that same road that I had walked up so many years ago. I saw that nothing had changed. There were the lush gardens and the flies and the stench of the sewage and the rubbish tip. It was as if nothing had happened at all. Bang Kwang was a vacuum in which time came to a stop, while the rest of the world drifted on by. I turned and looked back at Big Tiger and it was alive. This was a living thing.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div></dd>
<dt class="field">Me Talk Pretty One Day (2000)</dt>
<dd><div class=" "><p>by <em>David Sedaris</em></p>
<p>Easily the best collection I&rsquo;ve read from Mr. Sedaris. Hilarious from start to finish and I found myself laughing out loud at several points and annoyed/entertained my friends by reading aloud largely context-free passages and then braying like a donkey. It&rsquo;s hard to pick a favorite, but while the times-on-hard-drugs stories were incredibly good, it was the moving-to-France ones that really hit home—<em>See you again yesterday</em>, the eponymous <em>Me Talk Pretty One Day</em> and <em>Jesus Shaves</em> (<span class="quote-inline">&ldquo;He nice, the Jesus.&rdquo;</span>) and <em>Picka Pocketoni</em> are all good. His stories about his family, though, those are just out of this world: <em>You Can&rsquo;t Kill the Rooster</em> and <em>I&rsquo;ll Eat What He&rsquo;s Wearing</em> are too bizarre to be true—although I suspect that there is more than a kernel of truth to many of his stories. It doesn&rsquo;t matter, the mantle of America&rsquo;s modern-day Mark Twain rests firmly on this man&rsquo;s shoulders.</p>
</div></dd>
<dt class="field">The Hundred Foot Journey (2008)</dt>
<dd><div class=" "><p>by <em>Richard C. Morais</em></p>
<p>A book about an Indian family that moves from Bombay to England to France. The first two parts are quite evocatively written, about Mumbai and the French Jura, respectively. The prose is at times a bit heavy-handed with its metaphor, but the author sticks to his idea of comparing lovely things in nature to lovely food and mostly makes it work. It&rsquo;s in the third—and longest—part that he lost my attention, when his hero goes to Paris and, seemingly without pathos, effort, muss, fuss or doubt, climbs to the top of the food world.</p>
<p>The author&rsquo;s politics also figure much more heavily here and it feels almost as if he was faking his empathy for the simpler, more natural first chapters. The hero ends up running a €350-per-person restaurant and is still portrayed as unfairly beleaguered by an overly restrictive and regulated French socialist state, eager to squeeze every centime it can from the hard-working upper classes. There is a lengthy and largely uninformed diatribe on French worker relations (chapter 17) that portray an upside-down world in which the workers hold their employers for ransom. [2] With his mask off, he in no way differs from the Rand Pauls of the world, happy to draw broad conclusions in favor of disbanding the government based on cherry-picked anecdotes. At any rate, it felt quite out of place, as did the ever-more-extravagant settings, menus and detailed descriptions of food items, wines and appliances.</p>
<p>The further I read, the more it felt like Dan Brown—also known for pointing out things like the <em>brand</em> of a refrigerator—or Stieg Larsson, whose characters are also singularly successful millionaires, attractive, with women throwing themselves at their feet. Even his previously somewhat charming food-as-metaphor started to unravel disastrously, when his <span class="quote-inline">&ldquo;sommelier […] had the inspired idea to twin the partridge with the 1996 Côtes du Rhône Cuvée Romaine, a robust red redolent of dogs panting and on point in the lushness of a summer hunt.&rdquo;</span> Not only pretentious nearly beyond all imagining, but also almost certainly not aware of what redolent means. Recommendation? Read only the first two parts and leave off the end. Also, he&rsquo;s missing a hyphen in the book&rsquo;s title.</p>
</div></dd>
<dt class="field">The Road (2006)</dt>
<dd><div class=" "><p>by <em>Cormac McCarthy</em></p>
<p>Bleakness. Despair. A gray, ashy road winding into dimly lit mists. The overcast horizon lying just over the next hill reveals listlessly churning clouds, heavy with rain. Repeat for hundreds of pages. I forgot to put in a bookmark after about 40 pages and it took me a few minutes to find my place again because each chapter looked just like the one before and after it. The story is of a man and his son fighting their hungry, bored, weak and hopeless way through a post-apocalyptic America. The disaster is presented as fact, with no time wasted on explanations. It&rsquo;s a tone poem of sorts, repeatedly describing the same scene in various ways to hammer home the bleakness. If you&rsquo;ve seen the movie, you&rsquo;ll realize that the almost unbearably annoying kid in the movie <em>nailed</em> his role. The kid in the book is arguably worse. Spoiler alert: my theory is that the kid doesn&rsquo;t even exist, that he&rsquo;s a figment of the man&rsquo;s imagination, a sign of his madness.</p>
</div></dd>
<dt class="field">Innocents Abroad (1869)</dt>
<dd><div class=" "><p>by <em>Mark Twain</em></p>
<p>The narrator takes a steamship journey across the Atlantic from America to the Old World, jaunting from the Canary Islands to Gibraltar to Paris, Italy, Greece, Turkey and then a long jaunt through the Middle East. Twain is at his snarky best with tongue firmly in cheek as he describes the splendors of Europe through the lens of a jaded, modern man—and taking into account the tourist-trap nature of many of these locations, even in the 1800s. There are descriptive passages that are so evocatively written that it takes your breath away—you&rsquo;ll read them two or three times. The man was truly an utter <em>master</em> of the written (English) word.</p>
<p>In an attempt to loosely describe the tone of the journal/travelogue, I list the following, several main themes that cropped up now and again:</p>
<ul>
<li><div>The beauty of the Middle East is enjoyed more in reflection than live. This is primarily due to two reasons:<ol>
<li>The people of the Middle East are, on the whole, quite poor and beg almost incessantly for &ldquo;bucksheesh&rdquo;. Their din drives out all thought, philosophical contemplation and enjoyment.</li>
<li>The landscape of the Middle East is far from inspiring and gains appeal only through association with historical figures and events, many of them fabricated.</li></ol></div></li>
<li>Despite these shortcomings, most travelers to the Middle East—indeed any place that, in reality, is not what it&rsquo;s cracked up to be—will, in retrospect, pluck those shining moments from a desert of desolate, wasted time and come to the conclusion that they not only enjoyed their trip, but that it was a rapturous epiphany. Those travelers without the imagination to do so themselves will gladly begin early by parroting the rapturous ravings of others (usually Tour-Guide authors) while they are still there, resulting in them rather incongruously depicting a barren desert as a lush paradise in the rush to complete their their future readers&rsquo; brainwashing.</li>
<li>The pilgrims along on his journey were all inveterate thieves, smashing &ldquo;specimens&rdquo; from every relic, wall, building and monument that they encountered.</li>
<li>There were a hell of a lot of quarantines in those days. In almost every port they landed, the ship was quarantined and they had to smuggle themselves ashore in order to enjoy the sights.</li>
<li>Billiards tables anywhere but America are in a horrible state of affairs, including the cues.</li>
<li>Lake Tahoe is the most beautiful place on Earth and nothing compares.</li></ul></div></dd>
<dt class="field">TypeScript Language Specification (2012)</dt>
<dd><div class=" "><p>by <em>Microsoft</em></p>
<p>Typescript is a statically typed overlay language for Javascript. The primary purpose of the language is to bring some order to the chaos that is Javascript development. Typescript does not have a runtime; it is intended that Javascript be generated from it, in a process amply and precisely described throughout the specification. The transformation is, for the most part, elegant and concise and reflects the kind of Javascript that a seasoned and disciplined developer would write. Typescript achieves these results with a much more concise, readable, maintainable, expressive and powerful language.</p>
</div></dd>
</dl><p><hr></p>
<div class="footnote-reference"><span id="footnote_DRAFTABLE_ENTRY_2607_1_body" class="footnote-number">[1]</span> Arthur C. Clarke has died since the book&rsquo;s publication. This bodes ill for the series, as it&rsquo;s my suspicion that Baxter is responsible for the more heavy-handed and simplistic philosophical underpinnings; he&rsquo;s a good hard-science author, but his attitude toward the humanities is a bit too clinical and dismissive for my tastes.</div><div class="footnote-reference"><span id="footnote_DRAFTABLE_ENTRY_2607_2_body" class="footnote-number">[2]</span> Morais is a former columnist and editor for Forbes magazine and has what one might call an enormous soft spot for the 1%. The pity is that he hid it so well in the first parts and needn&rsquo;t have ruined an otherwise fun book with his uninformed—or incorrectly informed—ideology.</div><div class="footnote-reference"><span id="footnote_DRAFTABLE_ENTRY_2607_3_body" class="footnote-number">[3]</span> Not only because I could sympathize with his experience in that regard, but also because I read the book while on a long weekend in a French town very much like the one in Normandy where his Hugh has a home.</div>      </div>
      </div>
        <div class="footer">
    <div class="footer-data"><div class="footer-links"><ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/contact.php" title="">Contact</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/support.php" title="">Support</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/privacy.php" title="">Privacy</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/rights.php" title="">Rights</a></li></ul></div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="copyright">Copyright (c) 1999-2026 earthli.com. All Rights Reserved.</div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="versions">Powered by <ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore/app_news.php">earthli News 3.7</a></li><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore" title="">earthli WebCore&trade; 3.7</a></li></ul></div></div>    </div>
      </div>
  </div>  </body>
</html>
]]>
  </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
      <title type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[Bad Erotica for the Masses]]>
  </title>
    <id>https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=2673</id>
    <link href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=2673"/>
    <updated>2012-07-15T17:03:37+02:00</updated>
    <author>
        <name type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[Marco von Ballmoos]]>
  </name>
      <uri>https://earthli.com/users/marco</uri>
    </author>
      <summary type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<p>If scooping information from the madly bubbling froth of the U.S. media lies at all within your purview, you will no doubt have heard of the latest rage in American literature, called <em>50 Shades of Grey</em>. A modicum of research reveals that the epithet <em>literature</em> is a good deal more generous a term... [<a class="complete-text-link" href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=2673">More</a>]</p>
]]>
  </summary>
      <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<html lang="en">
  <head>
    <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/themes/ice.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/fonts/raleway.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/core/medium.css">
  </head>
  <body>
<div class="style-controls">  <div class="page">
    <div class="page-body">
<div class="info-box-top">
<p>
Published by <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_user.php?name=marco" title="Marco von Ballmoos" class="visible">marco</a> on <span class="date-time">15. Jul 2012 17:03:37 (GMT-5)</span>
</p>
<p>
Updated by <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_user.php?name=marco" title="Marco von Ballmoos" class="visible">marco</a> on <span class="date-time">16. Jul 2012 19:28:56 (GMT-5)</span>
</p>
</div>
      <div class="text-flow wide">
  <p>If scooping information from the madly bubbling froth of the U.S. media lies at all within your purview, you will no doubt have heard of the latest rage in American literature, called <em>50 Shades of Grey</em>. A modicum of research reveals that the epithet <em>literature</em> is a good deal more generous a term than the referenced work earns. </p>
<p>It&rsquo;s more commonly called &ldquo;Mommy Porn&rdquo; [1] which seems to be the designator that U.S. culture is going to use to indicate that reading poorly written soft-core pornography is now considered less than reprehensible. In this, the U.S. lags a good part of the rest of the world; the pity is that the popular demand to which it capitulated is for such low-quality erotica rather than some of the more renowned works of the tradition. [2]</p>
<p>Readers of these trashier variants—heretofore known as &ldquo;bodice-rippers&rdquo;—had become accustomed to being careful about with whom they shared their tastes. The advent of e-books were an absolute Godsend as it allowed them to read what they liked without hiding the cover from their nosy neighbors or their co-commuters.</p>
<p>The U.S. is notoriously prudish and it&rsquo;s hard tell whether this celebration of what is essentially trashy erotica is indicative of a general trend or just a well-orchestrated marketing campaign. Trashiness has always been accepted, but the acceptable degree of sexual content never came close to matching that for violence. Where a film that depicts hundreds of people being mowed down could garner a rating that allowed 13-year–olds to watch it without supervision, it could not contain even a split-second of female nipple on screen without being doomed to an R-rating.</p>
<p>But an analysis of the societal piety of the U.S. is a discussion for another day. The question is: is the book bad? Yeah, it sounds pretty bad. One review in particular—<a href="http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/340987215">Fifty Shades (#1)</a> by <cite>Katrina Lumsden</cite> (<cite><a href="http://www.goodreads.com/">GoodReads</a></cite>)—summarizes the two lead characters as follows:</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Ana is just a giant mess of a human being. She&rsquo;s insecure to the point of it being laughable […] and a complete ditz. […] Christian is a misogynistic, self-loathing, abusive piece of shit. […] Most of the time he&rsquo;s serious, brooding, and threatening. How charming.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>And why is the lead male character (Christian) worth supplicating to? Why, because he&rsquo;s rich and good-looking and, because of the genre, well-hung. So, this is yet another book that—perhaps unwittingly?—has a member of the lower echelons idolizing the rich and letting them get away with almost anything because of that feature. You would think that America would be <em>less</em> likely to be taken with a book about a rich guy subordinating a woman just because he can.</p>
<p>And why, when people tend to like books starring characters with whom they identify, do so many people identify with a ditz with serious self-esteem issues? Or are they just enjoying watching an idiot get her comeuppance—for being an idiot? Is this perhaps evidence of cruelty more than identification or sympathy? Are they voyeuristically experiencing what a great—and well-equipped—lover she thinks Christian is, or are they laughing at her for thinking she, who started the book as a virgin, could even be in a position to judge either quality?</p>
<p>If you&rsquo;ve seen a few pages, you may be reminded of the clumsy writing associated with the <em>Twilight</em> novels. The article <a href="http://dearauthor.com/features/industry-news/master-of-the-universe-versus-fifty-shades-by-e-l-james-comparison/">Master of the Universe versus Fifty Shades by E.L James Comparison</a> makes a strong case for the book being a barely modified rehash of some extended Twilight fan-fiction written by James herself between 2009 and 2011. You can&rsquo;t plagiarize yourself, of course, but the point is that it was bad enough that the country was taken by storm by the execrable writing of Stephanie Meyer, but now it&rsquo;s dropped a level further by being swept away by a search/replace update of a fan-fiction based on the same series. The important thing is that the submissive female lead-role made it unscathed. The publisher and author claim that 50 Shades is completely original; a comparison of the two works using <a href="http://turnitin.com">Turnitin</a>—a self-styled <span class="quote-inline">&ldquo;global leader in plagiarism prevention and online grading&rdquo;</span>—showed that the works are 89% similar, with many pages differing only by the names of the characters.</p>
<p>And all of Hollywood is jostling to participate in a movie based on the book. I wonder who&rsquo;s jostling more? Actresses dying to play yet another submissive, ditzy lead? Maybe Katie Holmes now that she&rsquo;s not so busy with Scientology? Or actors dying to play the rich misogynist? Michael Douglas has the right pedigree—it&rsquo;s the role he played in <em>Basic Instinct</em>, <em>Fatal Attraction</em> and others—but he&rsquo;s gotten a bit long in the tooth. Rumor has it that Angelina Jolie is looking to direct it which doesn&rsquo;t quite jell with the strength of some of her more recent films—<em>Changeling</em>, <em>A Mighty Heart</em> and <em>In the Land of Blood and Honey</em> spring to mind—and makes you wonder whether she&rsquo;s even read the book or is just riding the tide of popular opinion. </p>
<p><hr></p>
<div class="footnote-reference"><span id="footnote_DRAFTABLE_ENTRY_2673_1_body" class="footnote-number">[1]</span> Am I the only one who sees this as a more-than-oblique reference to the far-more-ubiquitous &ldquo;Kiddie Porn&rdquo;? Is that really the connection the publisher wishes to draw? Somehow I doubt it.</div><div class="footnote-reference"><span id="footnote_DRAFTABLE_ENTRY_2673_2_body" class="footnote-number">[2]</span> As a tale of a woman who willingly submitted to the submissive role in a dom/sub relationship, it sounds like a pale shadow of <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Story_of_O"><em>L&rsquo;Histoire d&rsquo;O</em></a> (<em>Story of O</em>), which was published in 1954.</div>      </div>
      </div>
        <div class="footer">
    <div class="footer-data"><div class="footer-links"><ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/contact.php" title="">Contact</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/support.php" title="">Support</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/privacy.php" title="">Privacy</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/rights.php" title="">Rights</a></li></ul></div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="copyright">Copyright (c) 1999-2026 earthli.com. All Rights Reserved.</div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="versions">Powered by <ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore/app_news.php">earthli News 3.7</a></li><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore" title="">earthli WebCore&trade; 3.7</a></li></ul></div></div>    </div>
      </div>
  </div>  </body>
</html>
]]>
  </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
      <title type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[Books read in 2011]]>
  </title>
    <id>https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=2459</id>
    <link href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=2459"/>
    <updated>2012-01-01T12:41:11+01:00</updated>
    <author>
        <name type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[Marco von Ballmoos]]>
  </name>
      <uri>https://earthli.com/users/marco</uri>
    </author>
      <summary type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<ol>
<li><a href="#Tell">Tell Me No Lies: Investigative Journalism that Changed the World (2005)</a></li>
<li><a href="#Sirens">The Sirens of Titan (1959)</a></li>
<li><a href="#Welle">Die Welle (de) (1981)</a></li>
<li><a href="#Covering">Covering Islam (1981)</a></li>
<li><a href="#Holidays">Holidays on Ice (1997)</a></li>
<li><a href="#Etranger">L&rsquo;étranger (fr) (1942)</a></li>
<li><a href="#Liar">The Liar (1991)</a></li>
<li><a href="#Identity">Identity and Violence (2006)</a></li>
<li><a href="#Prince">The Prince (1513)</a></li>
<li><a href="#Oil">Oil! (1927)</a></li>
<li><a href="#Summer">Summer Crossing (1950)</a></li>
<li><a href="#Picasso">Picasso at... [<a class="complete-text-link" href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=2459">More</a>]</a></li></ol>]]>
  </summary>
      <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<html lang="en">
  <head>
    <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/themes/ice.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/fonts/raleway.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/core/medium.css">
  </head>
  <body>
<div class="style-controls">  <div class="page">
    <div class="page-body">
<div class="info-box-top">
<p>
Published by <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_user.php?name=marco" title="Marco von Ballmoos" class="visible">marco</a> on <span class="date-time">1. Jan 2012 12:41:11 (GMT-5)</span>
</p>
<p>
Updated by <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_user.php?name=marco" title="Marco von Ballmoos" class="visible">marco</a> on <span class="date-time">15. Dec 2025 21:36:33 (GMT-5)</span>
</p>
</div>
      <div class="text-flow wide">
  <ol>
<li><a href="#Tell">Tell Me No Lies: Investigative Journalism that Changed the World (2005)</a></li>
<li><a href="#Sirens">The Sirens of Titan (1959)</a></li>
<li><a href="#Welle">Die Welle (de) (1981)</a></li>
<li><a href="#Covering">Covering Islam (1981)</a></li>
<li><a href="#Holidays">Holidays on Ice (1997)</a></li>
<li><a href="#Etranger">L&rsquo;étranger (fr) (1942)</a></li>
<li><a href="#Liar">The Liar (1991)</a></li>
<li><a href="#Identity">Identity and Violence (2006)</a></li>
<li><a href="#Prince">The Prince (1513)</a></li>
<li><a href="#Oil">Oil! (1927)</a></li>
<li><a href="#Summer">Summer Crossing (1950)</a></li>
<li><a href="#Picasso">Picasso at the Lapin Agile (1993)</a></li>
<li><a href="#Stars">The Stars&rsquo; Tennis Balls (2000)</a></li>
<li><a href="#Unseen">Unseen Academicals (2009)</a></li>
<li><a href="#Enchatress">The Enchantress of Florence (2008)</a></li>
<li><a href="#Just">Just After Sunset (2008)</a></li>
<li><a href="#Profits">Profits Over People (1999)</a></li>
<li><a href="#Zeit">Die Zeit-Maschine (1895) (de)</a></li>
<li><a href="#Against">Against the Day (2006)</a></li>
<li><a href="#Complete">Complete Prose (1992)</a></li>
<li><a href="#Giftzwerge">Giftzwerge – Wenn der Nachbar zum Feind wird (1992)</a></li>
<li><a href="#Left">Left for Dead – My Journey Home From Everest (2001)</a></li>
<li><a href="#Plunder">Plunder and Blunder (2009)</a></li>
<li><a href="#War">War is a Force that Gives Us Meaning (2002)</a></li>
<li><a href="#Pan">The Great God Pan (1890)</a></li>
<li><a href="#Dragon">The Girl with the Dragon Tattoo (2005)</a></li>
<li><a href="#9-11">9-11 (2001, 2002)</a></li>
<li><a href="#Defense">In Defense of Lost Causes (2008, 2009)</a></li>
<li><a href="#Shopgirl">Shopgirl (2000)</a></li>
<li><a href="#Power">The Power of Love: My Experience in a U.S. Immigration Jail</a></li>
<li><a href="#Logo">No Logo (2000/2002)</a></li>
<li><a href="#Homage">Homage To Catalonia (1952)</a></li>
<li><a href="#Bad">Bad Samaritans – The Myth of Free Trade and the Secret History of Capitalism (2008)</a></li>
<li><a href="#Perfect">A Perfect Crime (1998)</a></li>
<li><a href="#Innocent">The Innocent Man (2006)</a></li></ol><dl><dt class="field"><span id="Tell">Tell Me No Lies: Investigative Journalism that Changed the World (2005)</span></dt>
<dd><div class=" "><p>by <em>John Pilger</em></p>
<p>This book contains the best—or most legendary—articles from the best journalists of the 20th century. They range from Martha Gellhorn&rsquo;s reports on Dachau to Pilger&rsquo;s own reports from the Killing Fields to Fisk&rsquo;s peerless reporting from Iraq in the early 21st century. It&rsquo;s highly recommended for anyone who cares about history—and getting their news from people who got it right when it was <em>happening</em>.</p>
</div></dd>
<dt class="field"><span id="Sirens">The Sirens of Titan (1959)</span></dt>
<dd><div class=" "><p>by <em>Kurt Vonnegut</em></p>
<p>Vonnegut&rsquo;s second novel, this book is typical of his style: concise yet descriptive, and using science fiction as a backdrop against which to display his philosophy. Also, it was utterly bereft of semicolons. There are also the subtle—and not-so-subtle—barbs against religion and anti-humanists as well. The book is essentially about luck and about the luck of being born in the right place and at the right time and how sometimes that which appears to be luck is actually machination at a completely unknowable higher level and how, though the true meaning of a particular life may perhaps not be very meaningful to the person living it, it has a meaning that is in a grand scheme that, well, also doesn&rsquo;t seem very meaningful because it&rsquo;s also a part of an even grander scheme. So it goes.</p>
</div></dd>
<dt class="field"><span id="Welle">Die Welle (de) (1981)</span></dt>
<dd><div class=" "><p>by <em>Morton Rhue</em></p>
<p>This is a story of an American high school teacher who decides to teach his class about Nazism in a peculiar way: by letting them relive it. His students had nothing but contempt for the Germans who simply stood by while the Third Reich perpetrated its crimes against humanity. When offered a part in a similar regime, nearly all of them jumped in with both feet and took part in a new party, called &ldquo;The Wave&rdquo;. The translation was pretty awful [1] and at times completely ignored what was clearly idiomatic in the original English, but it was worth it for the finale.</p>
</div></dd>
<dt class="field"><span id="Covering">Covering Islam (1981)</span></dt>
<dd><div class=" "><p>by <em>Edward W. Said</em></p>
<p>One could never accuse Said of failing to provide enough detail for or providing enough formulations of his arguments. As in <em>Orientalism</em>, Said explores what it means to have the culture in power rely for its reconnaissance on other cultures entirely on persons who are themselves either nearly utterly unfamiliar with or so overburdened with preconceptions about said cultures as to render anything they have to say as, if not meaningless, without any rational or scientific usefulness. It&rsquo;s a marvelously crafted book, but let the prior sentence serve as an example of the kind of elaborate—if well-constructed—prose through which you&rsquo;ll have to wade if you give this book its due.</p>
</div></dd>
<dt class="field"><span id="Holidays">Holidays on Ice (1997)</span></dt>
<dd><div class=" "><p>by <em>David Sedaris</em></p>
<p>A fun collection of essays by a wickedly funny and sarcastic American writer. These are all about the the Christmas holiday season and the slim volume is actually just the right size (any more at once would have been too much). I also read a few essays from his longer book of essays, <em>Naked</em>, but had had enough of Sedaris for one weekend. Funny but weird stories written in either an auto- or semi-autobiographical vein about an odd man (or boy, depending on chronology) who thinks he&rsquo;s normal and the rest of the world is off.</p>
</div></dd>
<dt class="field"><span id="Etranger">L&rsquo;étranger (fr) (1942)</span></dt>
<dd><div class=" "><p>by <em>Albert Camus</em></p>
<p>Since George Bush was, apparently, able to read it in English, I tackled it in French. It&rsquo;s not very long and spends most of the first two-thirds describing the life of a middle-class wage-slave in Algeria who spends his weekends on the beach, going to movies and sleeping with girls. His life nearly utterly lacks meaning. His mother dies at the very beginning, which would factor into his trial at the end. The reason he is on trial is nearly overwhelmingly trivial and senseless, though he seems to take it just as in stride as everything else in his life. He bobs along on the stream of consciousness, not paddling very much. The style reminded me at times of Hemingway—the brief phrasing and wording as well as rather cold narration of weighty events—and of Achebe at others—probably just the scenic descriptions and names.</p>
</div></dd>
<dt class="field"><span id="Liar">The Liar (1991)</span></dt>
<dd><div class=" "><p>by <em>Stephen Fry</em></p>
<p>An absolutely masterful command of the English language; a marvelous grasp of comedic timing; a natural-born storyteller&rsquo;s addiction to detail and prevarication. For anyone who ever liked anything that Douglas Adams ever wrote and wished he&rsquo;d written more, there&rsquo;s Stephen Fry. I would say the same of Terry Pratchett, though Fry&rsquo;s style is nearly utterly unlike Pratchett&rsquo;s. Be prepared to learn new words and new things about life in an all-boys school in England. Through anti-hero and don, Donald Trefusis, Fry makes an absolutely eloquent plea for the rescue of the English language from the clutches of the banal.</p>
</div></dd>
<dt class="field"><span id="Identity">Identity and Violence (2006)</span></dt>
<dd><div class=" "><p>by <em>Amartya Sen</em></p>
<p>I approached my first book by this Nobel-Prize winner with enthusiasm and was quickly disappointed by the writing style and, quite frankly, the repetitive and somewhat obvious content. It was a bit of a crashing to Earth after the anticipation of reading something by <span class="quote-inline">&ldquo;one of the world&rsquo;s great thinkers&rdquo;</span> (as indicated on the cover). His prose is unnecessarily tangled (contrasted with that of Edward Said, who employed <em>necessarily</em> tangled prose), it is mind-numbingly repetitive and exceedingly conciliatory to the ruling class, of which I think he seems to think he is not a part, but to which he quite clearly—at least in part—belongs. Again and again, his language and formulations give nations and the powerful the benefit of the doubt that the predations they visit upon their subjects and the unfairness of the world they rule is purely due to one unfortunate accident after another.</p>
</div></dd>
<dt class="field"><span id="Prince">The Prince (1513)</span></dt>
<dd><div class=" "><p>by <em>Niccolò Machiavelli</em></p>
<p>I read the translation from the original Italian by <em>Harvey C. Mansfield</em>. It&rsquo;s a relatively compact how-to guide to ruling people and their countries for fun and profit. Mostly profit. The information is laid out in a no-nonsense, some would say ruthless, way. It kind of reminded me of <em>The Art of War</em> by <em>Sun Tzu</em>. Though we can today read it and nod in agreement, we have to also remember that it was written in the early 1500s, so all of those ideas were fresh at the time.</p>
</div></dd>
<dt class="field"><span id="Oil">Oil! (1927)</span></dt>
<dd><div class=" "><p>by <em>Upton Sinclair</em></p>
<p>A fascinating look at early 20th-century America where the oil business serves as a backdrop to a story about the simultaneous rise of plutocracy and plummet of the working class. The book is narrated from the point of view of the son of an oil-man, an oil-man who starts off with some sympathy for his common man but, over the years, sheds it as he ends his days fleeing from a government his business swindled. The rampant anti-Bolshevik, anti-Communist and anti-Socialist attitude in America at the time is frightening with the law cracking down on dissenters with impunity. Almost 100 years later, the enemies have changed but the rhetoric has a familiar ring. As does the stark class disparity and self-aggrandizing reasoning of the few who arrogate the wealth of the nation to themselves—for the good of the people and the nation, of course. Plus ça change, plus c&rsquo;est la même chose.</p>
</div></dd>
<dt class="field"><span id="Summer">Summer Crossing (1950)</span></dt>
<dd><div class=" "><p>by <em>Truman Capote</em></p>
<p>The story of a rich family&rsquo;s daughter who didn&rsquo;t want to travel with her family by boat to Paris. She chooses instead to stay behind in her New York apartment slumming it with the lower classes. Quite nicely written in places but the story of a spoiled rich girl trying to ruin the life she&rsquo;d gotten on a silver platter didn&rsquo;t grab me much. That she perhaps wanted something different than comfort and wealth, that she wanted <em>love</em> and something <em>real</em> instead of what she had is a possible interpretation. A story of the idle rich; those who envy them will see this book one way; those who hate them will see it another.</p>
</div></dd>
<dt class="field"><span id="Picasso">Picasso at the Lapin Agile (1993)</span></dt>
<dd><div class=" "><p>by <em>Steve Martin</em></p>
<p>An interesting little play by Mr. Martin (yes, <em>that</em> Steve Martin) in which Einstein plays a starring role, as does Picasso. Lots of interesting wordplay as well as the requisite worldly bartender of the <em>Lapin Agile</em> who seems somehow smarter than anyone else.</p>
</div></dd>
<dt class="field"><span id="Stars">The Stars&rsquo; Tennis Balls (2000)</span></dt>
<dd><div class=" "><p>by <em>Stephen Fry</em></p>
<p>Another fun, fun book by Mr. Fry (I&rsquo;d just read <em>The Liar</em> a few months back) that stars Ned, a schoolboy whose life is turned upside down by the cruelty of other schoolboys. Lots of intimation of rampant homosexuality in the British school system. The plot? Think <em>Count of Monte Cristo</em> with almost no deviation, but that&rsquo;s a good thing because Fry, as I mentioned above, is a helluva entertaining writer.</p>
</div></dd>
<dt class="field"><span id="Unseen">Unseen Academicals (2009)</span></dt>
<dd><div class=" "><p>by <em>Terry Pratchett</em></p>
<p>This is the first book from Discworld after Pratchett&rsquo;s announcement that he has Alzheimer&rsquo;s. The affliction is not yet evident as the book stands up well to the rest of the Discworld corpus. It&rsquo;s the story of racism and demonization of the other, embodied in the unprepossessing Mr. Nutt. There&rsquo;s also a good deal about a sport that vaguely resembles football in there. Vimes is not present, but Vetinari plays a supporting role. The wizards are there in their bumbling glory, with Archchancellor Ridley being innocently sly as usual. The fearless Glenda is a strong new character who more than easily carries much of the book.</p>
</div></dd>
<dt class="field"><span id="Enchatress">The Enchantress of Florence (2008)</span></dt>
<dd><div class=" "><p>by <em>Salman Rushdie</em></p>
<p>An amazing story—or series of tales, all entwined—told by a master storyteller. A traveler skilled in many arts lands in the court of a great king and strikes up a friendship on the basis of a shaky relation from the deep past. Wonderful characters and attention to historical detail that weaves with fantastical elements. A completely unexpected ending. A great novel for anyone looking to get acquainted with the writing of Rushdie.</p>
</div></dd>
<dt class="field"><span id="Just">Just After Sunset (2008)</span></dt>
<dd><div class=" "><p>by <em>Stephen King</em></p>
<p>A collection of short stories by King, all of which had been published in various magazines over the years. <em>Harvey&rsquo;s Dream</em> is wonderfully told, as is <em>The Things They Left Behind</em>, a uniquely Kingsian take on the survivors of 9–11. <em>N</em> is a tour-de-force that plays with one of King&rsquo;s favorite themes: the thinness of the wall between reality and the raving, gibbering madness that lies just beyond. <em>Mute</em> is a tale with a classic twist, told well. <em>A Very Tight Place</em> is also right up King&rsquo;s alley, with the tale of a nearly inconceivable situation and human endurance and perseverance.</p>
</div></dd>
<dt class="field"><span id="Profits">Profits Over People (1999)</span></dt>
<dd><div class=" "><p>by <em>Noam Chomsky</em></p>
<p>A great book about the late 80s and early 90s in America, which is all you need to know about the plutocracy of the naughts of the 21th century. A great way of getting into Chomsky and a great way of seeing the roots of the kleptocracy under which America suffers today.</p>
</div></dd>
<dt class="field"><span id="Zeit">Die Zeit-Maschine (1895) (de)</span></dt>
<dd><div class=" "><p>by <em>H.G. Wells</em></p>
<p>Who knew that this book was about class struggle? The Eloi are the degraded rich who become sheep for the ravaging Morlocks, who are the cannibalistic descendants of the working classes. Less science fiction and more social commentary. I read it in German.</p>
</div></dd>
<dt class="field"><span id="Against">Against the Day (2006)</span></dt>
<dd><div class=" "><p>by <em>Thomas Pynchon</em></p>
<p>As with <em>Gravity&rsquo;s Rainbow</em>, it took a while to get into it, but then there was no stopping. A fascinating cast of characters from the wild west in the last 19th century to the Europe of the early 20th. Entwined with a story of alternate worlds, time slippages, alternate histories, mathematics and competing theories that break out in war. Tesla makes mysterious appearances, as do other notables of the time. More satisfying than <em>Gravity&rsquo;s Rainbow</em>—deeper somehow. It&rsquo;s probably only recommendable to fans of Pynchon or anyone willing to read a complex, 1000-page novel of semi-historical fiction.</p>
</div></dd>
<dt class="field"><span id="Complete">Complete Prose (1992)</span></dt>
<dd><div class=" "><p>by <em>Woody Allen</em></p>
<p>A series of bizarre stories, many of which are composed almost purely of surrealistic non-sequiturs. Some of the longer stories are quite good, with <em>The Whore of Mensa</em>, <em>Death Knocks</em>, <em>Gossage-Vardebedian Papers</em> and <em>Retribution</em> grabbing my attention in one way or another.</p>
</div></dd>
<dt class="field"><span id="Giftzwerge">Giftzwerge – Wenn der Nachbar zum Feind wird (1992)</span></dt>
<dd><div class=" "><p>von <em>Thomas Bergmann</em></p>
<p>Some of the stories of neighbors fighting are decent, but the book got a bit repetitive in the end. All of the stories are from the German civil court system, which seems absolutely inundated with people who are completely unable to talk to one another or compromise in any way. I assume that this is not unique to Germany, though.</p>
</div></dd>
<dt class="field"><span id="Left">Left for Dead – My Journey Home From Everest (2001)</span></dt>
<dd><div class=" "><p>by <em>Beck Weathers &amp; Stephen J. Michaud</em></p>
<p>An awful book about an awful man, awfully written. The family is insufferable, has enough money and connections to make all of their problems go away and yet still manage to fill an entire book with whining, self-loathing and self-pity. Some of the mountain stuff is OK, but it only makes you want to avoid climbers and high-altitude climbing if at all possible.</p>
</div></dd>
<dt class="field"><span id="Plunder">Plunder and Blunder (2009)</span></dt>
<dd><div class=" "><p>by <em>Dean Baker</em></p>
<p>A masterful and concise treatment of the state of the financial world, national governance, corruption and a map of the current oligarchy. A perfect overview for those interested in knowing why things are so broken and how to fix them. Pulls no punches. Baker, as I&rsquo;ve said many times, is a national treasure. Well-paired with Chomsky&rsquo;s <em>Profits over People</em> (reviewed above).</p>
</div></dd>
<dt class="field"><span id="War">War is a Force that Gives Us Meaning (2002)</span></dt>
<dd><div class=" "><p>by <em>Chris Hedges</em></p>
<p>A plaintive disparagement of war in all its forms from a journalist who&rsquo;s been seduced and horrified by it. Hedges considers war as a drug to which all of mankind is addicted. Some of the book is smooth and well-edited philosophy whereas other parts seems to be cobbled from impressions gathered at various points in his career and documented in various essays, so there isn&rsquo;t one, smooth ethical thread guiding the whole affair. Instead, some parts are written with the voice of a man still deep in the grips of his addiction—when he cheers the intervention in 1998—and other parts represent a more clear-eyed condemnation of any war, so-called humanitarian or otherwise.</p>
</div></dd>
<dt class="field"><span id="Pan">The Great God Pan (1890)</span></dt>
<dd><div class=" "><p>by <em>Arthur Machen</em></p>
<p>Recommended by Stephen King as the inspiration for his story, <em>N</em>, in the collection, <em>After Sunset</em>. Though King raved about it, I found his paean to it, <em>N</em>, much more to my liking. Machen&rsquo;s version didn&rsquo;t elicit as much horror of the unknown as King&rsquo;s but that may be due to its age (over 100 years old) and the style, which goes on even more than King. Worth reading for the ambitious use of flashbacks and discontinuous plotting.</p>
</div></dd>
<dt class="field"><span id="Dragon">The Girl with the Dragon Tattoo (2005)</span></dt>
<dd><div class=" "><p>by <em>Stieg Larsson</em></p>
<p>First off: much, much better than Dan Brown, so people&rsquo;s tastes seem to be improving. The style, while not bad, is still quite dry and clearly journalistic with its obsessive depiction of inconsequential detail, so it&rsquo;s still not even close to the effortless style of a Rushdie, for example. Similar to Brown, the plot is quite interesting and draws one further, though Larsson manages to make every revelation anti-climactic somehow (this may be due to his being a particularly heavy-handed foreshadower). In what is undoubtedly typical of such escapist fiction, everyone is rich, sexy, brilliant, successful and healthy (except for some throwaway characters or where unhealthiness is relevant to the plot). No one is boring. Oh, and the book may as well have been titled &ldquo;Deus Ex Machina Deluxe&rdquo;. Despite all that, it was a fun read for the genre.</p>
</div></dd>
<dt class="field"><span id="9-11">9-11 (2001, 2002)</span></dt>
<dd><div class=" "><p>by <em>Noam Chomsky</em></p>
<p>A short compendium of interviews with Chomsky from throughout the year after the 9–11 attacks. A highly condensed primer to the historical and ideological background to those attacks as well as the U.S. response. An excellent introductory book for anyone new to Chomsky.</p>
</div></dd>
<dt class="field"><span id="Defense">In Defense of Lost Causes (2008, 2009)</span></dt>
<dd><div class=" "><p>by <em>Slavoj Žižek</em></p>
<p>This is a long, dense and at times nearly impossible-to-read-or-decipher treatise on the state of philosophy, the state of intellectualism, the state of economics and the state of morality. Whatever your attitude toward Žižek, you can deny neither his intelligence nor his immense depth of research. He sees connections everywhere and is at times infuriatingly difficult to follow, though I fear that this is more the reader&rsquo;s shortcoming than his. His shortcoming is that he is, at times, a poor author, devolving to a style of delivery that is common to the lofty aeries of high philosophy and that is nearly impossible to decipher if one does not spend years steeped in the same jargon. The book is a very timely read as it predicts and supports the Occupy Wall Street protests with a plethora of historical and modern philosophical underpinning. Over 500 pages of dense philosophy is not for the faint of heart, but it was worth it.</p>
</div></dd>
<dt class="field"><span id="Shopgirl">Shopgirl (2000)</span></dt>
<dd><div class=" "><p>by <em>Steve Martin</em></p>
<p>An elegantly crafted novella about a young woman living on her own in LA. It is a novel about ennui, medically-induced stability, LA culture, the arts scene and, tangentially, about love as a man thinks a woman sees it. It is quite consistently sad, though there are a few fleeting high points. The impression one gets is of a land where the sun shines all the time and no one is truly happy. </p>
</div></dd>
<dt class="field"><span id="Power">The Power of Love: My Experience in a U.S. Immigration Jail</span></dt>
<dd><div class=" "><p>by <em>Ana Amalia Guzmán Molina</em></p>
<p>A somewhat unevenly translated story [2] of a family caught in U.S. immigration hell for a year and a half. The story takes place in 1999-2000, so it was before even the greater depredations of the Bush administration post-9–11 or the even greater ones (as recently reported) of the Obama administration. Overcrowding, inhumane treatment, insufficient nutrition, a near-total lack of medical care: if the U.S. jails are the worst in the first world, the U.S. immigration jails are the worst of those. The facts are interesting, but they are delivered through a miasma of Christian proselytizing that is a bit difficult to swallow at times.</p>
</div></dd>
<dt class="field"><span id="Logo">No Logo (2000/2002)</span></dt>
<dd><div class=" "><p>by <em>Naomi Klein</em></p>
<p>Klein describes the state of branding, transnational corporations and privatized globalization of society in the late 90s, mostly from a Canadian and an American perspective. It&rsquo;s very well-written and eminently readable considering its content and serves as yet another reminder [3] that the economic problems facing the world are neither new nor were they unpredictable. That the class divide continues to grow is not an accident, but a logical conclusion of policy and planning. The book covers the decline of industry in North America (although Mexico, as part of the third world has acquired some industry) as well as the shape of industry and production in the EPZs (Export Processing Zones) run by the same corporations that are bending first-world society to its own ends, with branding and advertising as a primary weapon. An excellent read that portends the Occupy movement at least as much as Žižek&rsquo;s <em>In Defense of Lost Causes</em>.</p>
</div></dd>
<dt class="field"><span id="Homage">Homage To Catalonia (1952)</span></dt>
<dd><div class=" "><p>by <em>George Orwell</em></p>
<p>Orwell&rsquo;s diary of his time serving in the Catalonian Army fighting Franco&rsquo;s fascist forces in Spain during the late 30s. Orwell traveled with his wife to Spain to report on the conflict and was so taken with the cause that he joined up immediately. Life at the front is miserable and almost completely futile, with no progress made by either side. Orwell punctuates the account with chapters analyzing the journalistic coverage of the war at the time and contrasting it with his own experience. The laziness of the media and its tendency to simply propagandize that which the ruling class in its home nation wants it to is nothing new or unique to our time. Orwell is a passionate defender of the truth whose prose isn&rsquo;t dated and still reads very well today.</p>
</div></dd>
<dt class="field"><span id="Bad">Bad Samaritans – The Myth of Free Trade and the Secret History of Capitalism (2008)</span></dt>
<dd><div class=" "><p>by <em>Ha-Joon Chang</em></p>
<p>This book addresses the same issue as one of his previous books, <em>Kicking Away the Ladder</em>, but Mr. Chang&rsquo;s literary style has improved by leaps and bounds since the relatively dry and academic treatment in that book. The book lays out irrefutable evidence that neoliberal economics is not only wrong, but a deliberate sham promulgated by con-men bent on power and money. That&rsquo;s not Chang&rsquo;s conclusion, it&rsquo;s mine; he wasn&rsquo;t willing to go that far because he&rsquo;s an academic, but it&rsquo;s clear. The first-world countries used massive protectionism to get where they are—as they should have—and are now trying to keep the other countries down with specious arguments that belie their own histories (i.e. they &ldquo;kick away the ladder&rdquo;). Another extremely readable and interesting book, especially considering the subject matter.</p>
</div></dd>
<dt class="field"><span id="Perfect">A Perfect Crime (1998)</span></dt>
<dd><div class=" "><p>by <em>Peter Abrahams</em></p>
<p>This book prominently features an endorsement by Stephen King, who praises Abrahams&rsquo;s writing. Thankfully, this turns out to be true. The story is quite good and not horribly predictable and the writing was pretty tight. The story is basically of what happens when a marital affair is discovered by a husband who is overwhelmed by his own brilliance. He gets involved with a criminal who is similarly hobbled. Both are quite deluded.</p>
</div></dd>
<dt class="field"><span id="Innocent">The Innocent Man (2006)</span></dt>
<dd><div class=" "><p>by <em>John Grisham</em></p>
<p>Grisham ventures into non-fiction in a book that one gets the feeling he was compelled to write: his anger at the injustice, incompetence and lack of empathy of the U.S. justice system, from cops to DAs to judges, is palpable. The story centers on several capital cases in Oklahoma. Evidence is circumstantial at best, confessions are laughable and extorted under extreme duress, legal procedure is ignored, defense is lazy and incompetent, the media is oblivious and bloodthirsty, as are the jurors. Men whose lives were already shitty spend dozens of years of their lives in hellholes that pass for prisons, losing their sanity and their health, if not their ties to to their families and communities. And, when the mistake is finally acknowledged through the selfless efforts of the few remaining defenders of justice, the man walks free with no apology, no job, no training, no compensation for lost years and life, nothing but further ostracization from the community. The book can be a bit repetitive, but the subject matter is riveting and worth everyone&rsquo;s time. It&rsquo;s good to see someone of Grisham&rsquo;s influence taking such a strong stance.</p>
</div></dd>
</dl><p><hr></p>
<div class="footnote-reference"><span id="footnote_DRAFTABLE_ENTRY_2459_1_body" class="footnote-number">[1]</span> The novel was originally in English, but I was loaned a German copy to read. I have a feeling that the original was also simply atrocious prose.</div><div class="footnote-reference"><span id="footnote_DRAFTABLE_ENTRY_2459_2_body" class="footnote-number">[2]</span> The original, <em>El Poder del Amor</em> is in Spanish and is included in the copy I had. My Spanish isn&rsquo;t great, but good enough to determine that the English version lacked a certain amount of idiomatic flair found in the original.</div><div class="footnote-reference"><span id="footnote_DRAFTABLE_ENTRY_2459_3_body" class="footnote-number">[3]</span> Along with <em>Profits over People</em> by Noam Chomsky and <em>Plunder and Blunder</em> by Dean Baker.</div>      </div>
      </div>
        <div class="footer">
    <div class="footer-data"><div class="footer-links"><ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/contact.php" title="">Contact</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/support.php" title="">Support</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/privacy.php" title="">Privacy</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/rights.php" title="">Rights</a></li></ul></div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="copyright">Copyright (c) 1999-2026 earthli.com. All Rights Reserved.</div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="versions">Powered by <ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore/app_news.php">earthli News 3.7</a></li><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore" title="">earthli WebCore&trade; 3.7</a></li></ul></div></div>    </div>
      </div>
  </div>  </body>
</html>
]]>
  </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
      <title type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[Movies Without Reviews]]>
  </title>
    <id>https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=2503</id>
    <link href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=2503"/>
    <updated>2011-03-19T16:20:19+01:00</updated>
    <author>
        <name type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[Marco von Ballmoos]]>
  </name>
      <uri>https://earthli.com/users/marco</uri>
    </author>
      <summary type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<p>I&rsquo;ve been keeping track of the movies I watched for a couple of years now, but have only recently been adding mini-reviews [1] to each so I can remember (A) what it was about and (B) whether I liked it.</p>
<p>Since I&rsquo;m no longer maintaining the old text file in which I kept this list, I&rsquo;m dumping the list... [<a class="complete-text-link" href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=2503">More</a>]</p>
]]>
  </summary>
      <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<html lang="en">
  <head>
    <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/themes/ice.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/fonts/raleway.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/core/medium.css">
  </head>
  <body>
<div class="style-controls">  <div class="page">
    <div class="page-body">
<div class="info-box-top">
<p>
Published by <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_user.php?name=marco" title="Marco von Ballmoos" class="visible">marco</a> on <span class="date-time">19. Mar 2011 16:20:19 (GMT-5)</span>
</p>
<p>
Updated by <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_user.php?name=marco" title="Marco von Ballmoos" class="visible">marco</a> on <span class="date-time">21. Feb 2016 12:27:42 (GMT-5)</span>
</p>
</div>
      <div class="text-flow wide">
  <p>I&rsquo;ve been keeping track of the movies I watched for a couple of years now, but have only recently been adding mini-reviews [1] to each so I can remember (A) what it was about and (B) whether I liked it.</p>
<p>Since I&rsquo;m no longer maintaining the old text file in which I kept this list, I&rsquo;m dumping the list here.</p>
<h2>2008 (or so)</h2><ol>
<li>Monster (2003) — <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0340855/">8/10</a></li>
<li>The Good Shepherd (2006) — <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0343737/">7/10</a></li>
<li>Breach (2007) — <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0401997/">7/10</a></li>
<li>Sweeney Todd: The Demon Barber of Fleet Street (2007) — <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0408236/">7/10</a></li>
<li>Eastern Promises (2007) — <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0765443/">9/10</a></li>
<li>Fearless (2006) — <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0446059/">8/10</a></li>
<li>Pan&rsquo;s Labyrinth (2006) — <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0457430/">8/10</a></li>
<li>Idiocracy (2006) — <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0387808/">8/10</a></li>
<li>The Fountain (2006) — <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0414993/">8/10</a></li>
<li>Babel (2006) — <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0449467/">6/10</a></li>
<li>Shooter (2007) — <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0822854/">8/10</a></li>
<li>The Machinist (2004) — <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0361862/">8/10</a></li>
<li>Jarhead (2005) — <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0418763/">7/10</a></li>
<li>Good night ,and Good Luck (2005) — <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0433383/">9/10</a></li>
<li>Equilibrium (2002) — <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0238380/">9/10</a></li>
<li>Music and Lyrics (2007) — <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0758766/">6/10</a></li>
<li>Zodiac (2007) — <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0443706/">9/10</a></li>
<li>A Scanner Darkly (2006) — <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0405296/">8/10</a></li>
<li>The Last King of Scotland (2006) — <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0455590/">8/10</a></li>
<li>Death Proof (2007) — <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1028528/">7/10</a></li>
<li>Children of Men (2006) — <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0206634/">8/10</a></li>
<li>The Prestige (2006) — <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0482571/">10/10</a></li>
<li>John Rambo (2008) — <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0462499/">7/10</a></li>
<li>Next (2007) — <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0435705/">5/10</a></li>
<li>Keeping Mum (2005) — <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0444653/">7/10</a></li>
<li>Brokeback Mountain (2005) — <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0388795/">8/10</a></li>
<li>Cop Land (1997) — <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0118887/">8/10</a></li>
<li>Das Leben der Anderen (2006) — <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0405094/">9/10</a></li>
<li>Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull (2008) — <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0367882/">4/10</a></li>
<li>The Dark Knight (2008) — <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0468569/">9/10</a></li>
<li>Superman Returns (2006) — <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0348150/">5/10</a></li>
<li>300 (2006) — <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0416449/">5/10</a></li>
<li>Hancock (2008) — <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0448157/">7/10</a></li>
<li>The Mummy: Tomb Of The Dragon Emperor (2008)  — <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0859163/">6/10</a></li>
<li>Rescue Dawn (2006) — <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0462504/">9/10</a></li>
<li>Iron Man (2008) — <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0371746/">8/10</a></li></ol><h2>2009</h2><ol>
<li>Princess Bride (1987) — <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0093779/">9/10</a></li>
<li>Mamma Mia! (2008) — <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0795421/">6/10</a></li>
<li>Monster&rsquo;s Ball (2001) — <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0285742/">6/10</a></li>
<li>Stranger than Fiction (2006) — <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0420223/">8/10</a></li>
<li>Talladega Nights: The Ballad of Ricky Bobby — <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0415306/">7/10</a></li>
<li>Sicko (2007) — <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0386032/">7/10</a></li>
<li>Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix (2007) — <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0373889/">7/10</a></li>
<li>I Love You, Man (2009) — <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1155056/">7/10</a></li>
<li>The Darjeeling Limited (2007) — <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0838221/">8/10</a></li>
<li>Quantum of Solace (2008) — <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0830515/">6/10</a></li>
<li>Angels &amp; Demons (2009) — <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0808151/">4/10</a></li>
<li>Gran Torino (2008) — <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1205489/">9/10</a></li>
<li>Control (2004) — <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0374584/">8/10</a></li>
<li>Rocky Balboa (2006) — <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0479143/">7/10</a></li>
<li>Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince (2009) — <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0417741/">7/10</a></li>
<li>X-Men Origins: Wolverine (2009) — <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0458525/">7/10</a></li>
<li>Whatever Works (2009) — <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1178663/">8/10</a></li>
<li>Miller&rsquo;s Crossing (1990) — <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0100150/">9/10</a></li>
<li>Battle Royale (2000) — <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0266308/">4/10</a></li>
<li>2012 (2009) — <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1190080/">5/10</a></li>
<li>Blades of Glory (2007) — <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0445934/">6/10</a></li>
<li>2046 (2004) — <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0212712/">8/10</a></li>
<li>I Am Legend (2007) — <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0480249/">6/10</a></li>
<li>Blood Simple (1984) — <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0086979/">8/10</a></li>
<li>Shaun of the Dead (2004) — <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0365748/">7/10</a></li>
<li>The Hangover (2009) — <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1119646/">7/10</a></li>
<li>Reservoir Dogs (1992) — <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0105236/">8/10</a></li>
<li>The Host (2005) — <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0468492/">5/10</a></li>
<li>The Pervert&rsquo;s Guide to Cinema (2006) — <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0828154/">9/10</a></li>
<li>Extract (2009) — <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1225822/">6/10</a></li>
<li>Up (2009) — <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1049413/">6/10</a></li>
<li>Star Trek (2009) — <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0796366/">9/10</a></li></ol><h2>2010</h2><ol>
<li>In Debt We Trust: American Before the Bubble Bursts (2006) — <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0829429/">8/10</a></li>
<li>Food, Inc. (2008) — <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1286537/">9/10</a></li>
<li>G.I. Joe − Rise of the Cobra (2009) — <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1046173/">4/10</a></li>
<li>Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen (2009) — <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1055369/">4/10</a></li>
<li>Watchmen (2009) — <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0409459/">9/10</a></li>
<li>Why We Fight (2005) — <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0436971/">8/10</a></li>
<li>Bronson (2008) — <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1172570/">7/10</a></li>
<li>Collapse (2009) — <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1503769/">8/10</a></li>
<li>I.O.U.S.A. (2008) — <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0963807/">8/10</a></li>
<li>Iraq for Sale: The War Profiteers (2006) — <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0815181/">7/10</a></li>
<li>Standard Operating Procedure (2008) — <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0896866/">8/10</a></li>
<li>War, Inc. (2008) — <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0884224/">6/10</a></li>
<li>Zizek! (2005) — <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0478338/">8/10</a></li>
<li>Public Enemies (2009) — <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1152836/">4/10</a></li>
<li>Wall-E (2008) — <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0910970/">8/10</a></li>
<li>The Reader (2008) — <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0976051/">8/10</a></li>
<li>Drag Me to Hell (2009) — <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1127180/">6/10</a></li>
<li>Die Schweizermacher (1978) — <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0078212/">9/10</a></li>
<li>West Side Story (1961) — <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0055614/">6/10</a></li>
<li>Sixteen Candles (1984) — <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0088128/">7/10</a></li>
<li>Pretty in Pink (1986) — <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0091790/">6/10</a></li>
<li>Logorama (2009) — <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1563725/">7/10</a></li>
<li>An Inconvenient Truth (2006) — <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0497116/">8/10</a></li>
<li>In the Loop (2009) — <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1226774/">7/10</a></li>
<li>Footloose (1984) — <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0087277/">6/10</a></li>
<li>The Bridge on the River Kwai (1957) — <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0050212/">9/10</a></li>
<li>Rendition (2007) — <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0804522/">7/10</a></li>
<li>Chicago (2002) — <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0299658/">8/10</a></li>
<li>Ghost Rider (2007) — <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0259324/">5/10</a></li>
<li>Hitman (2007) — <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0465494/">6/10</a></li>
<li>The Wizard of Oz (1939) — <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0032138/">6/10</a></li>
<li>Casablanca (1942) — <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0034583/">9/10</a></li>
<li>Sunshine Cleaning (2008) — <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0862846/">7/10</a></li>
<li>3:10 to Yuma (2007) — <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0381849/">7/10</a></li>
<li>No Country for Old Men (2007) — <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0477348/">9/10</a></li>
<li>Hurt Locker (2009) — <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0887912/">5/10</a></li>
<li>Lakeview Terrace (2008) — <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0947802/">4/10</a></li>
<li>Precious (2009) — <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0929632/">9/10</a></li>
<li>Ghost World (2001) — <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0162346/">7/10</a></li>
<li>Man Push Cart (2005) — <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0464105/">8/10</a></li>
<li>Slumdog Millionaire (2008) — <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1010048/">5/10</a></li>
<li>Synecdoche, New York (2008) — <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0383028/">9/10</a></li>
<li>Youth in Revolt (2009) — <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0403702/">7/10</a></li>
<li>Julie &amp; Julia (2009) — <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1135503/">6/10</a></li>
<li>The Men Who Stare at Goats — <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1234548/">6/10</a></li>
<li>Alice in Wonderland — <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1014759/">6/10</a></li>
<li>Death at a Funeral (2007) — <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0795368/">7/10</a></li>
<li>Land of the Lost (2009) — <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0457400/">6/10</a></li>
<li>All About Steve (2009) — <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0881891/">6/10</a></li>
<li>Der Baader Meinhof Komplex (2008) — <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0765432/">7/10</a></li>
<li>The X Files: I Want to Believe (2008) — <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0443701/">6/10</a></li>
<li>Iron Man 2 (2010) — <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1228705/">7/10</a></li>
<li>Sherlock Holmes — <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0988045/">8/10</a></li>
<li>This is It (2009) — <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1477715/">6/10</a></li>
<li>Hunger (2008) — <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0986233/">8/10</a></li>
<li>Wanted (2008) — <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0493464/">5/10</a></li></ol><p>The rest of the movies for 2010 and 2011 are listed in </p>
<ul>
<li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=2460">Capsule Movie Reviews Vol.2011.1</a></li>
<li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=2462">Capsule Movie Reviews Vol.2011.2</a></li>
<li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=2476">Capsule Movie Reviews Vol.2011.3</a></li></ul><p><hr></p>
<div class="footnote-reference"><span id="footnote_DRAFTABLE_ENTRY_2503_1_body" class="footnote-number">[1]</span> See the links at the end of the article, just above.</div>      </div>
      </div>
        <div class="footer">
    <div class="footer-data"><div class="footer-links"><ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/contact.php" title="">Contact</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/support.php" title="">Support</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/privacy.php" title="">Privacy</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/rights.php" title="">Rights</a></li></ul></div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="copyright">Copyright (c) 1999-2026 earthli.com. All Rights Reserved.</div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="versions">Powered by <ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore/app_news.php">earthli News 3.7</a></li><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore" title="">earthli WebCore&trade; 3.7</a></li></ul></div></div>    </div>
      </div>
  </div>  </body>
</html>
]]>
  </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
      <title type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[Books read in 2010]]>
  </title>
    <id>https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=2324</id>
    <link href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=2324"/>
    <updated>2011-01-01T21:30:17+01:00</updated>
    <author>
        <name type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[Marco von Ballmoos]]>
  </name>
      <uri>https://earthli.com/users/marco</uri>
    </author>
      <summary type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<ol>
<li>Foucault&rsquo;s Pendulum (1988) (second half) – Umberto Eco</li>
<li>The Great War of Civilization (2005) – Robert Fisk (second half)</li>
<li>Naked Pictures of Famous People (1998) – Jon Stewart</li>
<li>The Drought (1965) – JG Ballard</li>
<li>Drowned World (1962) – JG Ballard</li>
<li>Spook Country (2007) – William Gibson</li>
<li>Free Lunch... [<a class="complete-text-link" href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=2324">More</a>]</li></ol>]]>
  </summary>
      <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<html lang="en">
  <head>
    <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/themes/ice.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/fonts/raleway.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/core/medium.css">
  </head>
  <body>
<div class="style-controls">  <div class="page">
    <div class="page-body">
<div class="info-box-top">
<p>
Published by <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_user.php?name=marco" title="Marco von Ballmoos" class="visible">marco</a> on <span class="date-time">1. Jan 2011 21:30:17 (GMT-5)</span>
</p>
<p>
Updated by <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_user.php?name=marco" title="Marco von Ballmoos" class="visible">marco</a> on <span class="date-time">15. Feb 2011 16:57:10 (GMT-5)</span>
</p>
</div>
      <div class="text-flow wide">
  <ol>
<li>Foucault&rsquo;s Pendulum (1988) (second half) – Umberto Eco</li>
<li>The Great War of Civilization (2005) – Robert Fisk (second half)</li>
<li>Naked Pictures of Famous People (1998) – Jon Stewart</li>
<li>The Drought (1965) – JG Ballard</li>
<li>Drowned World (1962) – JG Ballard</li>
<li>Spook Country (2007) – William Gibson</li>
<li>Free Lunch (2007) – David Cay Johnston</li>
<li>Stardust (1999) – Neil Gaiman</li>
<li>Heat (2006) – George Monbiot</li>
<li>Unbowed (2006) – Wangari Maathai</li>
<li>Grieche sucht Griechin/Mister X macht Ferien/Zeitungswesen in der Steinzeit (1949-1978) – Friedrich Dürrenmatt (de)</li>
<li>Der Dativ ist dem Genitiv sein Tod (2006) – Bastian Sick (de)</li>
<li>Wie sollen wir leben? (1993) – Peter Singer (de)</li>
<li>Under the Dome (2009) – Stephen King</li>
<li>Witches Abroad (1991) – Terry Pratchett</li>
<li>Midnight&rsquo;s Children (1981) – Salman Rushdie</li>
<li>Freedom from Want (2005) – George Kent</li>
<li>Violence (2008) – Slavoj Žižek</li>
<li>Future − Four Novellas (2000) – Petter F. Hamilton, Stephen Baxter, Paul McAuley, Ian McDonald</li>
<li>Der Tod in Venedig (1966) – Thomas Mann (de)</li>
<li>Midnight in the Garden of Good and Evil (1994) – John Berendt</li>
<li>The Great Derangement (2008) – Matt Taibbi</li>
<li>Inherent Vice (2009) – Thomas Pynchon</li>
<li>Anathem (2008) – Neal Stephenson</li>
<li>The Satanic Verses (1988) – Salman Rushdie</li>
<li>The Jungle (1906) – Upton Sinclair</li>
<li>The Stuff of Thought: Language as  Window into Human Nature (2007) – Steven Pinker</li>
<li>Introducing HTML5 (2010) – Bruce Lawson &amp; Remy Sharp</li></ol>      </div>
      </div>
        <div class="footer">
    <div class="footer-data"><div class="footer-links"><ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/contact.php" title="">Contact</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/support.php" title="">Support</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/privacy.php" title="">Privacy</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/rights.php" title="">Rights</a></li></ul></div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="copyright">Copyright (c) 1999-2026 earthli.com. All Rights Reserved.</div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="versions">Powered by <ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore/app_news.php">earthli News 3.7</a></li><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore" title="">earthli WebCore&trade; 3.7</a></li></ul></div></div>    </div>
      </div>
  </div>  </body>
</html>
]]>
  </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
      <title type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[Struggling through the Lost Symbol]]>
  </title>
    <id>https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=2455</id>
    <link href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=2455"/>
    <updated>2011-01-01T14:24:11+01:00</updated>
    <author>
        <name type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[Marco von Ballmoos]]>
  </name>
      <uri>https://earthli.com/users/marco</uri>
    </author>
      <summary type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<p>It was the start of the long week between Christmas and New Year&rsquo;s Eve and it was time to start a new book. A quick scan of the book shelf revealed many interesting candidates, but most of those were a bit more challenging than a week of this kind warranted. But look who&rsquo;s hiding on one of the... [<a class="complete-text-link" href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=2455">More</a>]</p>
]]>
  </summary>
      <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<html lang="en">
  <head>
    <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/themes/ice.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/fonts/raleway.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/core/medium.css">
  </head>
  <body>
<div class="style-controls">  <div class="page">
    <div class="page-body">
<div class="info-box-top">
<p>
Published by <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_user.php?name=marco" title="Marco von Ballmoos" class="visible">marco</a> on <span class="date-time">1. Jan 2011 14:24:11 (GMT-5)</span>
</p>
<p>
Updated by <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_user.php?name=marco" title="Marco von Ballmoos" class="visible">marco</a> on <span class="date-time">21. Apr 2011 07:04:34 (GMT-5)</span>
</p>
</div>
      <div class="text-flow wide">
  <p>It was the start of the long week between Christmas and New Year&rsquo;s Eve and it was time to start a new book. A quick scan of the book shelf revealed many interesting candidates, but most of those were a bit more challenging than a week of this kind warranted. But look who&rsquo;s hiding on one of the shelves: good ol&rsquo; Dan Brown. </p>
<p>This copy of <em>The Lost Symbol</em> had been obtained from the local Salvation Army secondhand shop for only a couple of bucks. I&rsquo;d gotten Brown&rsquo;s two other books in the same way, but had to settle for translations in German. Those were pretty fun and I admit I kind of enjoyed the stories, even when they got kind of crazy. It&rsquo;s what escapist entertainment is for, no? Now it was time to try Mr. Brown &ldquo;in his own words&rdquo;, as it were.</p>
<p>So, let&rsquo;s crack the book and get started; it should be a quick read: readers with far less nimble minds than mine [1] have torn through Brown books in a weekend, so it should be an exciting romp.</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;<em>The secret is how to die.</em><br>
Since the beginning of time, the secret had always been how to die.<br>
The thirty-four-year-old inititate gazed down at the human skull cradled in his palms. The skull was hollow, like a bowl, filled with bloodred wine.&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote><p>Wait, <span class="quote-inline">&ldquo;like a bowl&rdquo;</span>? That&rsquo;s it? You added three extra words and two commas to explicate with that scintillating simile? Of course it&rsquo;s like a bowl; you just said it was a hollow skull. And why does it matter <em>exactly</em> how old the initiate is? Maybe eventually it will matter, but do we really need to know that detail in one of the first sentences in the book? And <em>bloodred</em> is not a word. It looks stupid like that.</p>
<p>Yeesh. That&rsquo;s only the first few sentences. This isn&rsquo;t nearly as relaxing as anticipated and now I&rsquo;m beginning to see that a tendency to lexical analysis is going to prove to be an impediment when reading Mr. Brown.</p>
<p>Let us, despite misgivings, press on. We don&rsquo;t feel like getting up for a return trip to the book shelf.</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Outside the main entrance, two <strong>seventeen-ton</strong> sphinxes guarded the bronze doors. (Emphasis added)&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>I&rsquo;m not going to be shipping them across the country, Dan, I don&rsquo;t need to know <em>exactly</em> how heavy they are.</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;This room was a perfect square. And cavernous.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>That those two &ldquo;sentences&rdquo; [2]—right at the beginning of the book—survived what had to have been a relatively rigorous editing process says quite a bit about the state of the publishing industry. Did anyone really edit this thing? Anyone beside Mr. Brown&rsquo;s children, who clearly helped with the plot and much of the dialogue? This feels like <em>The Phantom Menace</em> all over again.</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The ceiling soared an astonishing one hundred feet overhead [where else would a ceiling be? -ed.], supported by monolithic columns of green granite. A tiered gallery of dark Russian walnut seats [Are these &ldquo;dark, Russian, walnut seats&rdquo; or &ldquo;dark, Russian-walnut seats&rdquo; or what? -ed.] with hand-tooled pigskin encircled the room. A thirty-three-foot-tall throne dominated the western wall, with a concealed pipe organ opposite it. The walls were a kaleidoscope of ancient symbols…Egyptian, Hebraic, astronomical, alchemical, and others yet unknown.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>Oooh. A surfeit of nearly incomprehensible detail culminating in an &ldquo;everything but the kitchen&rdquo; sink approach to indicating just how <em>mysterious</em> and <em>ancient</em> and <em>in-fucking-effable</em> the symbols were. What are &ldquo;alchemical&rdquo; symbols? Or &ldquo;astronomical&rdquo; ones? Were there cosmological equations on the wall? Why not mention that the long-sought TOE or GUT was on the wall somewhere in a language nearly lost to the mists of time? [3]</p>
<p>Still, pretty impressive room, no? Thirty-three-foot-tall throne and all, with a pipe organ, symbols every-fucking-where and probably a to-scale orrery of the inner Solar System that went unmentioned due to its comparative mundanity. Mr. Brown throws in an <span class="quote-inline">&ldquo;expansive oculus [round window. -ed.] in the ceiling that [illuminates] the room&rsquo;s most startling feature&rdquo;</span>. Whoa, there&rsquo;s more? Isn&rsquo;t the throne enough? Wouldn&rsquo;t that just blow you away? Nope, that&rsquo;s nothing compared to the <span class="quote-inline">&ldquo;enormous altar [what – couldn&rsquo;t you find out its exact weight? -ed.] hewn from a solid block of Belgian black marble [Well, at least he managed to find out where it&rsquo;s <em>from</em>. -ed.]…&rdquo;</span></p>
<p>Steady as she goes; perhaps one can get accustomed to the superlative, hyperbolic style laced with near-autistic levels of detail.</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The initiate let his gaze climb the distinguished white-robed figure standing before him. <em>The Supreme Worshipful Master.</em>&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>Aw, hell no.</p>
<p>First off, do we have to subside into the passive voice so often and unflinchingly and seemingly without complaint? <em>Letting your gaze climb</em> someone is a form much more appropriate for bodice-rippers than novels about ancient mysteries. But maybe I&rsquo;m assuming too little about the direction this encounter is going to take.</p>
<p>So, does this master earn his name? You bet your ass he does:</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The man, in his late fifties, was an American icon, well loved [sic] [4], robust, and incalculably wealthy. His once-dark hair was turning silver, and his famous visage reflected a lifetime of power and vigorous intellect.&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>We get it. We got it just from the name. He&rsquo;s better in every way than you and I could ever hope to be. If you&rsquo;ve ever gone S.C.U.B.A diving, he&rsquo;s a solo cave-diver; if you wrote an article, he&rsquo;s written dozens of books; his mastery of the arts of love are legendary and puts yours in the shade. He&rsquo;s the bestest in every way, like James Bond, squared.</p>
<p>And WTF is a vigorous intellect? Is it the kind you better damned well not possess in order to get more than four pages into a Dan Brown novel without poking yourself in the eye in self-defense?</p>
<p>Stop being such an ass and just read the book. Fine. It&rsquo;s only the prologue, so finish up the remaining paragraphs—which are chock-full of foreshadowing designed to &ldquo;hook&rdquo; you for the remaining 500 pages [5]—and get to chapter one.</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The Otis elevator climbing the south pillar of the Eiffel Tower […]&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>Why do I care <em>which company</em> made the elevator? </p>
<p>Oh, to hell with it.</p>
<p><hr></p>
<div class="footnote-reference"><span id="footnote_DRAFTABLE_ENTRY_2455_1_body" class="footnote-number">[1]</span> Don&rsquo;t care. It&rsquo;s true.</div><div class="footnote-reference"><span id="footnote_DRAFTABLE_ENTRY_2455_2_body" class="footnote-number">[2]</span> The first is a sentence, albeit a very simple one. The second is two words followed by a full stop masquerading as a sentence to unenlightened readers.</div><div class="footnote-reference"><span id="footnote_DRAFTABLE_ENTRY_2455_3_body" class="footnote-number">[3]</span> Save for the last two members of identical septuplet sisters who speak this ancient language, but who have never met due to the fastidious machinations of a cabal who are <em>like</em> the Illuminati, but way more mysterious and in-fucking-effable. Oh, and the sisters are totally hot and have had white hair from birth and wicked gray eyes, so you might think that they kind of look like the two zombie guys from the second Matrix flick, which they kind of do, I guess, but they&rsquo;re way, way, way hotter. Trust me. Smokin&rsquo;.</div><div class="footnote-reference"><span id="footnote_DRAFTABLE_ENTRY_2455_4_body" class="footnote-number">[4]</span> The attitude toward hyphens is pretty scattershot throughout.</div><div class="footnote-reference"><span id="footnote_DRAFTABLE_ENTRY_2455_5_body" class="footnote-number">[5]</span> Which are, by the way, divided into 133 chapters. Really? Is that to help you feel like you&rsquo;re making your way through the book more quickly? Are the chapters little rewards for faithful readers?</div>      </div>
      </div>
        <div class="footer">
    <div class="footer-data"><div class="footer-links"><ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/contact.php" title="">Contact</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/support.php" title="">Support</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/privacy.php" title="">Privacy</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/rights.php" title="">Rights</a></li></ul></div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="copyright">Copyright (c) 1999-2026 earthli.com. All Rights Reserved.</div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="versions">Powered by <ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore/app_news.php">earthli News 3.7</a></li><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore" title="">earthli WebCore&trade; 3.7</a></li></ul></div></div>    </div>
      </div>
  </div>  </body>
</html>
]]>
  </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
      <title type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[Notes on Der Dativ ist dem Genitiv sein Tod by Bastian Sick]]>
  </title>
    <id>https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=2372</id>
    <link href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=2372"/>
    <updated>2010-05-09T00:16:13+02:00</updated>
    <author>
        <name type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[Marco von Ballmoos]]>
  </name>
      <uri>https://earthli.com/users/marco</uri>
    </author>
      <summary type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<p>In an effort to continue improving my German, I read the book mentioned in the title, which is a rollicking guide to the finicky nuance of the German language. A few years back, I read <em>Eat, Shoots and Leaves</em> by <em>Lynne Truss</em>, which effects a similar service for the English language. Another... [<a class="complete-text-link" href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=2372">More</a>]</p>
]]>
  </summary>
      <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<html lang="en">
  <head>
    <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/themes/ice.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/fonts/raleway.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/core/medium.css">
  </head>
  <body>
<div class="style-controls">  <div class="page">
    <div class="page-body">
<div class="info-box-top">
<p>
Published by <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_user.php?name=marco" title="Marco von Ballmoos" class="visible">marco</a> on <span class="date-time">9. May 2010 00:16:13 (GMT-5)</span>
</p>
</div>
      <div class="text-flow wide">
  <p>In an effort to continue improving my German, I read the book mentioned in the title, which is a rollicking guide to the finicky nuance of the German language. A few years back, I read <em>Eat, Shoots and Leaves</em> by <em>Lynne Truss</em>, which effects a similar service for the English language. Another absolutely wonderful essay on the issue of usage and grammar is <em>Tense Present: Democracy, English, and the wars over usage</em> by <em>David Foster Wallace</em> (a few citations of which are documented on <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=2294">earthli News</a>), which not only provides solid usage advice for what he (DFW) calls SWE (Standard Written English) but also a scintillating philosophical underpinning to a theory of dialect. </p>
<p>The German book above does something similar, with excursions into the nether regions of German grammar, in which certain parts of the country completely disdain the <em>Accusative</em> case whereas others ignore the <em>Dative</em> and pretty much the whole colloquial mass has decided to leave the <em>Genetive</em> well enough alone. Sick—as Wallace before him—acknowledges that people can&rsquo;t be expected to get everything right when German—with its three genders, gender-specific declensions, multiple cases, verbs that have a single declension, verbs that can be in one of two declensions and verbs that decline differently depending on object type (human or object?) and time of day (that&rsquo;s an exaggeration, but students of German know what I mean). Throw into the mix the fact that German actually has at least two official versions—<em>old</em> and <em>new</em> grammar, though only new grammar should really be used at this point, having been issued initially in 1996—and there is definitely a tendency for native German speakers and writers to feel like they can do what they please—because it&rsquo;s got to be correct <em>somewhere</em>.</p>
<p>But, just because it&rsquo;s difficult doesn&rsquo;t mean that getting it wrong is somehow acceptable. It may be colloquially accepted and common practice even in news organs that should know better, but it&rsquo;s still <em>wrong</em>. Wrong in this case being not grammatically correct by the official definition, which is all that is really salient when discussing a written language [1]. And, though some grammatical rules seem designed just to separate native speakers from those less fortunate, many rules are there to not only impart <em>clarity</em>, but to impart a lyrical quality that defines the language, that makes the language what it is, that makes the language &ldquo;sound&rdquo; right to a native speaker.</p>
<h2>Reading Finickily [2]</h2><p>Once you get to this level of language finickiness, though, you start to read everything through the lens of an editor. A recent example for this author was the home page of the <a href="http://www.jedichurch.org/">JediChurch – Jedi Religion and Jedi Faith</a>. The few small paragraphs describing the Jedi religion are fraught with poor phrasing and grammatical errors, enough so that they act as nigh-insurmountable speed bumps to a snoot (to borrow a term from DFW) [3].</p>
<p>For example, the initial paragraph:</p>
<blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The Jedi Church believes that there is one all powerful force that binds all things in the universe together. The Jedi religion is something innate inside everyone of us, the Jedi Church believes that our sense of morality is innate. So quiet your mind and listen to the force within you!&rdquo;</div></blockquote><p>First off, &ldquo;all-powerful&rdquo; is missing a hyphen. Secondly—and more egregiously—&rdquo;binding&rdquo; things &ldquo;together&rdquo; is redundant: it&rsquo;s sufficient to say that they are bound. Also, if you&rsquo;re addressing &ldquo;all things&rdquo;, you don&rsquo;t have to specify &ldquo;in the universe&rdquo; because that&rsquo;s redundant too. It would be far more succinct to write &ldquo;one all-powerful force that binds all things.&rdquo;</p>
<p>Furthermore, when something is &ldquo;innate&rdquo;, it&rsquo;s already clear that it&rsquo;s &ldquo;inside&rdquo;: that&rsquo;s what innate means. Also, &ldquo;everyone&rdquo; is an object, the sought-for construction in this case is &ldquo;every one&rdquo;. The &ldquo;something&rdquo; can be omitted because it&rsquo;s substituting a subject from which the sentence has not yet switched (&ldquo;Jedi religion&rdquo;, which immediately precedes it). The phrase &ldquo;of us&rdquo; is, sadly, also redundant, having already been sufficiently included in &ldquo;every one&rdquo;. But, instead of switching back to &ldquo;everyone&rdquo;, let&rsquo;s retain &ldquo;all of us&rdquo;, which is warmer and more apropos to a religion. So, let&rsquo;s rewrite the second sentence as &ldquo;The Jedi religion is innate to all of us.&rdquo;</p>
<p>Notice how we ended the sentence right there instead of retaining the purely nonsensical comma, placed in the original in what seems to have been a mad effort to continue the sentence despite its having so clearly been completed. It is here that a semicolon would (possibly) have been appropriate. I imagine that this was a Jedi trick played in order to keep us from noticing that the word &ldquo;Jedi&rdquo; and &ldquo;innate&rdquo; were used twice in rapid succession.</p>
<p>After reading that far, I decided that the Jedi religion was not for me. Writing isn&rsquo;t easy, and writing without an editor is even harder [4]. The Jedi home page smacks of a person who has too little practice succintly and clearly expressing himself [5] in written form. Many people in this situation tend to use a manner of expression that they consider <em>above their station</em> in order to sound more sophisticated. And that insecurity is often the source of the slightly skewed use and redundant phrasing evident in passages like the one cited above.</p>
<p>And perhaps also in this essay [6].</p>
<p><hr></p>
<div class="footnote-reference"><span id="footnote_DRAFTABLE_ENTRY_2372_1_body" class="footnote-number">[1]</span> Granted that there are texts written completely in local dialects and other texts that include dialogue in dialects, which also have their own rules to which a writer must adhere, but here the author defers to the DFW essay mentioned at the beginning of this article because he said all that there needs to be said on the subject of dialects and their place and said it much better, to boot.</div><div class="footnote-reference"><span id="footnote_DRAFTABLE_ENTRY_2372_2_body" class="footnote-number">[2]</span> A <em>snoot</em> is a person extremely—and perhaps excessively and obsessively, as well —concerned with proper grammar and punctuation.</div><div class="footnote-reference"><span id="footnote_DRAFTABLE_ENTRY_2372_3_body" class="footnote-number">[3]</span> The author freely admits to countless errors in his own texts, including the one above, due to tiredness, lack of interest or simply too many Martinis.</div><div class="footnote-reference"><span id="footnote_DRAFTABLE_ENTRY_2372_4_body" class="footnote-number">[4]</span> Or herself, of course, though the author will happily make the assumption that a web page about a religion from a science fiction universe was written by a guy. The word that should not—under any circumstances—appear here is <em>themselves</em>—as in <span class="quote-inline">&ldquo;smacks of a person […] clearly expressing <strong>themselves</strong>&rdquo;</span>—because that is mixing singular &amp; plural. And grammatically incorrect is worse than politically incorrect, in this author&rsquo;s humble opinion. Upon re-reading the sentence, the author noticed that he had actually initially written <span class="quote-inline">&ldquo;smacks of a person <strong>that</strong> […]&rdquo;</span>, which is incorrect because a person is a <em>who</em>, but, if you&rsquo;ve read this far, you clearly get the point that writing is a discipline that demands constant—if not hyper—vigilance.</div><div class="footnote-reference"><span id="footnote_DRAFTABLE_ENTRY_2372_5_body" class="footnote-number">[5]</span> The author is fully aware that this is an unusual adverb form and that the word &ldquo;finicky&rdquo; appears, to the casual observer, an inordinate number of times in this text.</div><div class="footnote-reference"><span id="footnote_DRAFTABLE_ENTRY_2372_6_body" class="footnote-number">[6]</span> To put into prose what the reader is perhaps, at this point, thinking. See definition of <em>snoot</em> above.</div>      </div>
      </div>
        <div class="footer">
    <div class="footer-data"><div class="footer-links"><ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/contact.php" title="">Contact</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/support.php" title="">Support</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/privacy.php" title="">Privacy</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/rights.php" title="">Rights</a></li></ul></div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="copyright">Copyright (c) 1999-2026 earthli.com. All Rights Reserved.</div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="versions">Powered by <ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore/app_news.php">earthli News 3.7</a></li><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore" title="">earthli WebCore&trade; 3.7</a></li></ul></div></div>    </div>
      </div>
  </div>  </body>
</html>
]]>
  </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
      <title type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[Citations from Heat by George Monbiot]]>
  </title>
    <id>https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=2349</id>
    <link href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=2349"/>
    <updated>2010-03-21T14:13:08+01:00</updated>
    <author>
        <name type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[Marco von Ballmoos]]>
  </name>
      <uri>https://earthli.com/users/marco</uri>
    </author>
      <summary type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<p><a href="https://www.earthli.com/data/news/attachments/entry/2349/heat_george_monbiot.jpg"><img src="https://www.earthli.com/data/news/attachments/entry/2349/heat_george_monbiot_tn.jpg" alt=" " class=" align-right"></a><em>Heat</em> is a very accessible book on the state of the world&rsquo;s climate, energy and heating needs today and going into the future. The author sets himself the task of coming up with a plan for our planet that is economically, socially and climatologically viable. His express goal is to keep convenience... [<a class="complete-text-link" href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_article.php?id=2349">More</a>]</p>
]]>
  </summary>
      <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us">
    <![CDATA[<html lang="en">
  <head>
    <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/themes/ice.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/fonts/raleway.css">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.earthli.com/resources/styles/core/medium.css">
  </head>
  <body>
<div class="style-controls">  <div class="page">
    <div class="page-body">
<div class="info-box-top">
<p>
Published by <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_user.php?name=marco" title="Marco von Ballmoos" class="visible">marco</a> on <span class="date-time">21. Mar 2010 14:13:08 (GMT-5)</span>
</p>
<p>
Updated by <a href="https://www.earthli.com/news/view_user.php?name=marco" title="Marco von Ballmoos" class="visible">marco</a> on <span class="date-time">4. Feb 2025 19:07:47 (GMT-5)</span>
</p>
</div>
      <div class="text-flow wide">
  <p><a href="https://www.earthli.com/data/news/attachments/entry/2349/heat_george_monbiot.jpg"><img src="https://www.earthli.com/data/news/attachments/entry/2349/heat_george_monbiot_tn.jpg" alt=" " class=" align-right"></a><em>Heat</em> is a very accessible book on the state of the world&rsquo;s climate, energy and heating needs today and going into the future. The author sets himself the task of coming up with a plan for our planet that is economically, socially and climatologically viable. His express goal is to keep convenience and freedom as much like it is now as possible while reducing CO2 emissions by 90% across the board—domestic usage, air travel, industrial, transports, construction and so on.</p>
<p>He will not altogether succeed, but his studies do show that much of the lifestyle to which we in the rich world have become accustomed is based on a profligate waste of what has heretofore been extremely cheap energy. More precisely, the energy we use is vastly undervalued and underpriced and usually heavily subsidized. The more micro-level of his studies are based on the UK and its culture and economy, but the results apply broadly to other countries, particularly Europe and the U.S. if not so well to the considerably different spread of energy use in China and India.</p>
<p>What follows are citations I found interesting enough to mark as I was reading. They are not meant to paint a picture, but are more interesting or just well-written nuggets of information culled from the book.</p>
<h2>Amazing Electricity</h2><p>For instance, the following paragraph illustrates a process that most of us take for granted. The proposals of many so-called environmentalists to replace a country&rsquo;s electricity grid with micro-turbines are made not only hopelessly, but laughably naive by not considering how the current system works and the level of service that it provides. Any replacement system will have to provide the same level of service or will have to wait until straits are much more dire.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;What this means is that the electricity companies must study the behaviour of their customers, chart their historical use of electricity, anticipate public holidays and national events, read the weather forecasts and the television schedules and study the ratings, and watch the penalty shoot-outs in order to determine when the entire country will lever its collective backside off the sofa.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 80</div></div><p>And the electricity companies do this <em>within minutes</em>. They may not be the most efficient or the cheapest, but the level of service they provide is amazing—and all the more amazing in that we never think about it at all. I&rsquo;ve lived in Switzerland for over seven years and can only recall one power outage, which lasted less than a second.</p>
<h2>Even Smarter Networks</h2><p>The system can be improved, though, with modern technology assisting devices to be much smarter about their own consumption. The devices can make decisions on their own or they could communicate with one another <em>right over the same lines from which they draw their power.</em></p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;An open standard protocol [should] be developed and published to allow information about the instantaneous price of electricity to be broadcast through the electricity supply system. Much of the electromagnetic frequency spectrum would be available for this purpose without interfering with the principal power supply function, much as a telephone line can simultaneously provide voice and broadband Internet service.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 116</div></div><p>A colleague of mine has Powerline, which uses exactly this kind of technology to allow home networks to run over the power lines running throughout a home instead of having to lay down dedicated cables or using a wireless network.</p>
<h2>Cars and Subsidies</h2><p>Most western society also deliberately encourages the wrong behavior. That is, those on the right might be sick to no end of the platitudes spouted by politicians about the environment. Because of this, they may feel that the government is left-leaning and poised to whisk away freedoms right out from under their libertarian feet. However, with politicians—with anyone, in fact—its important to remember that <em>whom they pay is more important than what they say.</em> For example, in England, subsidies are far heavier in support of automobiles than public transportation.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;One of the reasons for this can be found in the paper [The British government] published in 2005. The graphs there show that though gross domestic product has risen by 60 per cent since 1986, the cost of driving has fallen. The government expects the two lines to keep diverging to 2025 and beyond. While bus and coach fares have risen in real terms by 66 per cent since 1975, and train tickets by 70 per cent, the cost of owning and running a car has fallen by 11 per cent.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 145</div></div><p>Those using public transportation are seeing their costs rising far beyond any possible cost-of-living increase, which clearly actively discourages use of such. However, auto commuters have seen their costs drop, despite everything else having gotten more expensive. There is no way to imagine this happening without massive subsidies, likely mostly hidden, but nonetheless real. It&rsquo;s not a great stretch of the imagination to suppose that things are much the same in the States.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;The speed and acceleration of our cars is a form of profligacy at which all future generations will goggle.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 154</div></div><p>Nicely put. So not only has car ownership gotten cheaper, but cars have become more and more powerful—ridiculously overpowered for all practical purposes.</p>
<h2>Food</h2><p>Monbiot also takes care to very clearly and open-eyed address the sheer immorality of living our &ldquo;profligate&rdquo; lifestyles, which will very consequently lead to droughts in countries of which we have scarcely heard, and of multitudes of deaths of people that we would never have met. Out of sight, out of mind for most (this author included, difficult as it is to admit).</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;People who own cars – by definition – have more money than people at risk of starvation: their demand is &lsquo;effective&rsquo;, while the groans of the starving are not. In a contest between cars and people, the care would win. Something rather like this is happening already. Though 800 million people are permanently malnourished, the global increase in crop production is being used mostly to feed animals: the number of livestock on earth has quintupled since 1950. The reason is that those who buy meat and dairy products have more purchasing power than those who only buy subsistence crops.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 159</div></div><p>The world is raising more food than ever, but &ldquo;wasting&rdquo; it on feeding other food that ends up costing far more energy than is necessary. Meat is a unbelievable luxury to which most of us have become incredibly accustomed—but the costs are astronomical. </p>
<h2>Flying</h2><p>As with the automotive subsidies, the UK has no trouble talking out of both sides of its mouth vis-à-vis air travel. For example, they promise that increased air travel can somehow be reconciled with relatively aggresive carbon cuts.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div><p>&ldquo;The new runways [the British government] is planning &lsquo;would permit around 470 million passengers by 2030&rsquo;.</p>
<p>&ldquo;You might wonder how the British government reconciles this projection with its commitment to cut carbon emissions by 60 per cent by 2050. The answer is that it doesn&rsquo;t have to. As the Department for Transport cheerfully admits,</p>
<p>&ldquo;International flights from the UK do not currently count in the national inventories of greenhouse gas emissions as there is no international agreement yet on ways of allocating such emissions.</p>
<p>&ldquo;This is a remarkable evasion. It is true that there is &lsquo;no international agreement yet&rsquo;. But a child could see that you simply divide the emissions by half. The country from which passengers depart or in which they arrive accepts 50 per cent of the responsibility.&rdquo;</p>
</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 174</div></div><p>Aha! So that&rsquo;s how they do it! Air travel can be increased because, without an &ldquo;international agreement&rdquo; on parcelling out blame for the CO2 it generates, that CO2 can be ignored. *POOF* It just no longer exists. The planet, of course, will not ignore the CO2 as easily as self-interested politicians, who seem to have the morals and reasoning ability of four-year-olds.</p>
<p>Flying is a luxury taken for granted by those of us in the first world. I live in Switzerland, separated from a good part of my family, which lives in the States. That personal air travel (for the most part) cannot be reconciled with the massive drops in CO2 required by the climate affects me directly. It&rsquo;s hard to feel sorry for myself as it&rsquo;s not like I&rsquo;m starving, dehydrating or drowning as so many others are. But Monbiot puts it so well, let&rsquo;s let him say it:</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Perhaps the most intractable cause of global warming is &lsquo;love miles&rsquo;: the distance you must to travel [sic] to visit friends and partners and relatives on the other side of the planet. The world could be destroyed by love.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 22</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;A wealthy society&rsquo;s split incentives are shared by its government. As Tony Blair remarked, &lsquo;there is a mismatch in timing between the environmental and electoral impact.&rsquo; By the time the decisions he has made come home to roost, he will have been out of office for years. If a government allows the growth of air travel to continue, for example, the effects are delayed, diffuse and hard to blame on any one source. If, by contrast, it restricts or reverses the growth in flights, the effects are immediately attributable to its actions. Everyone knows who is responsible if we may no longer fly to Thailand.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 22</div></div><div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;So I offer you no comfort in this chapter. A 90 per cent cut in carbon emissions means the end of distant foreign holidays, unless you are prepared to take a long time getting there. It means that business meetings must take place over the Internet or by means of video conferences. It means that trans-continental journeys must be made by train – and even then not by the fastest trains – or coach. It means that journeys around the world must be reserved for visiting the people you love, and that they will require both slow travel and the saving up of carbon rations. It means the end of shopping trips to New York, parties in Ibiza, second homes in Tuscany and, most painfully for me, political meetings in Porto Alegre – <strong>unless you believe that these activities are worth the sacrifice of the biosphere and the lives of the poor.</strong> But I urge you to remember that these privations affect a tiny proportion of the world&rsquo;s people. <strong>The reason they seem so harsh is that this tiny proportion almost certainly includes you.</strong> (Emphasis added.)&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 187</div></div><p>The sentences I emphasized sum up the moral argument in a nutshell. It&rsquo;s really hard to argue your way around them.</p>
<h2>It&rsquo;s not me, it&rsquo;s you</h2><p>Even after having written the book, Monbiot still found it hard to imagine how exactly all of these dire predictions would affect his own life.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Similarly, when considering what might happen to people in my own country or in other parts of the rich world – in which the human impacts of global warming will be delayed both by our more forgiving climate and by the money we can spend on our protection – I have found the likely effects easy to catalogue but almost impossible to imagine. I can understand, intellectually, that &lsquo;life&rsquo; in this country might not be the same in thirty years&rsquo; time as it is today; that if climate change goes unchecked it could in fact be profoundly and catastrophically different. But somehow I have been unable to turn this knowledge into a recognition that my own life will alter. Like everyone who has been insulated from death, I have projected the future as repeated instance of the present. The world might change, but I will not.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 205</div></div><h2></h2><p>Hey, here&rsquo;s an idea! How about we do absolutely nothing and wait for the problem to go away by itself?</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;It could well be true that petroleum will peak within the next 10 years; it could also be true that it will take 30. If this is the case and if we have placed our faith in the decline of oil supplies while simultaneously failing to do anything to prevent it (not, I am afraid to say, an unlikely proposition), <strong>we could find ourselves facing catastrophic climate change <em>and</em> an unprecedented global depression.</strong> (Emphasis added)&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 209</div></div><p>The decline of oil will most certainly not be a fun time on this planet. There will be resource wars and nearly unimaginable transgressions against nature as the last dregs of petroleum are wrenched from the earth and bombarded with noxious chemicals to refine it. As Monbiot points out, the less dependent we are on such processes, the more we mitigate the effects of the inevitable economic privations that will come from a large, jarring and unplanned-for transition.</p>
<h2>On Carbon Indulgences</h2><p>So here&rsquo;s a nice explanation of why these indulgences are complete and utter bullshit. Again, the emphasis is mine, but it&rsquo;s the reason that proponents of such practices are guilty of hand-waving flim-flammery (yeah, I&rsquo;m kinda looking at you, Al Gore, though your film was quite good).</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;Planting trees in one place might kill trees elsewhere, as they could dry up a river which was feeding a forest downstream. By taking up land which might otherwise have been used to grow crops, it could drive local people to fell forests elsewhere in order to feed themselves. Your trees might die before they reach maturity, especially as their growing conditions change with global warming. Timber poachers could fell them; a forest fire could fry them. <strong>In other words, in flying to New York we can be sure that carbon dioxide has been released. In paying to plant trees, we cannot be sure that it will be absorbed.</strong> (Emphasis added.)&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 211</div></div><h2>Waiting for a Miracle</h2><p>In the end, Monbiot acknowledges that we are mostly still hoping for a miracle technological fix. But the preceding 215 pages showed that there are no miracles that will come quickly enough to save us. It is only pragmatic reduction, restriction and reorientation that will save us from ourselves.</p>
<div><div class="auto-content-block"><blockquote class="quote quote-block "><div>&ldquo;But if those governments that have expressed a commitment to stopping climate change have found their efforts frustrated, it is partly because they wanted them to be frustrated. They know that inside their electors is a small but insistent voice asking them both to try and to fail. They know that if they had the misfortune to succeed, our lives would have to change. They know that we can contemplate a transformation of anyone&rsquo;s existence but our own.&rdquo;</div></blockquote></div><div class="auto-content-caption">Page 213</div></div><p>The problem with climate change is that those that are causing the problem are those least incentivized to do anything about it. It&rsquo;s easy to imagine that the coming climate change will be a total game-changer. It may not be the undoing of mankind, but it will drastically reorganize things—one must at least become familiar with the word &ldquo;dystopia&rdquo; to discuss the future, I think.</p>
      </div>
      </div>
        <div class="footer">
    <div class="footer-data"><div class="footer-links"><ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/contact.php" title="">Contact</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/support.php" title="">Support</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/privacy.php" title="">Privacy</a></li><li><a href="https://www.earthli.com/shared/rights.php" title="">Rights</a></li></ul></div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="copyright">Copyright (c) 1999-2026 earthli.com. All Rights Reserved.</div></div><div class="footer-data"><div class="versions">Powered by <ul class="menu-items standard"><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore/app_news.php">earthli News 3.7</a></li><li><a href="http://earthli.com/software/webcore" title="">earthli WebCore&trade; 3.7</a></li></ul></div></div>    </div>
      </div>
  </div>  </body>
</html>
]]>
  </content>
  </entry>
</feed>
