|<<>>|172 of 260 Show listMobile Mode

Definitely, Maybe by Arkady Strugatsky (1977) (read in 2016)

Published by marco on

Disclaimer: these are notes I took while reading this book. They include citations I found interesting or enlightening or particularly well-written. In some cases, I’ve pointed out which of these applies to which citation; in others, I have not. Any benefit you gain from reading these notes is purely incidental to the purpose they serve of reminding me what I once read. Please see Wikipedia for a summary if I’ve failed to provide one sufficient for your purposes. If my notes serve to trigger an interest in this book, then I’m happy for you.

This is the story of a physics researcher, toiling alone on a problem, on the edge of a great discovery. The closer he gets to breaking through, to culminating his research, the more the universe seems to resist him. Distracting visitors drop by, his neighbor turns out to be much more than he’d appeared, then is murdered. The murder suspect is the researcher himself, with more visitors dropping in to threaten and cajole. He meets other researchers who, as they swap stories, all realize that they’ve been similarly stymied, that they each were gently nudged from their goal by an invisible and inexorable impasse.

In a vein similar to how capital-T Time resists change in 11/22/63, Stephen King’s novel about the Kennedy assassination, here it is the capital-U Universe that resists the plumbing of its deepest workings. They discover that its possible that the Universe tries to preserve a homeostatic balance between entropy and reasoning ability—not actively, but by a principle similar to Heisenberg’s about position and momentum. The cabal of scientists try to wrap their head around this concept and try to work out how they could even possibly continue to research it—or even harness it—if it is true. Because if it’s true, then it means that the Universe will resist investigation into proving this principle, by definition.

Citations

““Phil,” Malianov said. “Wait. Don’t you see it either? What the hell kind of supercivilization is this? Some supercivilization that prods us like a blind kitten. Why all this meaningless nonsense? My investigator and the cognac? Zakhar’s women? Where is the fundamental principle of reason: expediency, economy?” “Those are particulars,” Vecherovsky replied softly. “Why measure nonhuman expediency in human terms? And then remember with what force you smack yourself on the cheek to kill a crummy mosquito. A blow like that could easily kill all the mosquitoes in the vicinity.” Weingarten added: “Or, for instance. What is the expediency of building a bridge over a river from the point of view of a trout?””
Location 1206-1212
“You say: a united mankind. You see, for your plan, there may be some life-form that could do it, but not ours, not earthlings, I mean. Our people would never believe anything like that. You know when it will believe in a supercivilization? When that supercivilization stoops to our level and starts sprinkling us with bombs from whining spacecraft. Then we’ll believe, then we’ll be united, and even then not right away. We’ll probably wallop each other with a few salvos first.””
Location 1256-1260
“If it was the Homeostatic Universe quelling a microrebellion, that’s just how it should have seemed. Like a man swatting a fly with a towel—vicious, whistling blows cutting through the air; vases tumbling from shelves; lamps breaking; innocent moths falling victim to the blows; the cat, its paw stomped on, making a beeline for the couch. Massed power and inefficiency.”
Location 1666-1669
“It’s very unpleasant for a person to realize that he’s not at all what he thought he was. He wants to remain the way he was all his life, and that’s impossible if he capitulates. And so he has to … And yet there’s still a difference. In our century people shoot themselves because they’re ashamed before others—society, friends … In the last century people shot themselves because they were ashamed before themselves. You see, for some reason, in our century, everybody thinks that a person can always come to terms with himself. It’s probably true. I don’t know why. I don’t know what’s going on here. Maybe it’s because the world has become more complicated? Maybe it’s because now there are so many other concepts besides pride and honor that can be used to convince people.””
Location 1973-1980
“The fear, loathing, despair, and feeling of impotence came back, and I realized with unbearable clarity that from that moment a line of fire and brimstone that could never be crossed was drawn between Vecherovsky and me. I would have to stop behind it for the rest of my life, while he went on through the land mines, dust, and mud of battles I would never know and disappeared in the flaming horizon. He and I would nod hello when we ran into each other on the stairs, but I would stay on this side of the line with Weingarten, Zakhar, and Glukhov—drinking tea or beer, or chasing vodka with beer, and gabbing about intrigues and promotions, saving up for a car, and eking out my existence over some dull, official project.”
Location 2038-2043
“And I also thought that he said: “He knew how to scribble on paper under the candle’s crackle! He had something to die for by the Black River.” And his satisfied guffaws, like Wells’s Martian laughter, rang in my ears.”
Location 2107-2109
“Billion became for BN (and naturally, according to the law of communicating vessels, for AN as well) a novella about the tormenting and essentially hopeless struggle of mankind to preserve the “right of primogeniture” against the dull, blind, persistent force that knows neither honor, nor nobility, nor charity, that knows only one thing—how to achieve its goals, by any means, without any setbacks”
Location 2145-2148
““If you have the guts to be yourself,” as John Updike wrote, “other people’ll pay your price.””
Location 2151-2152
“And as we all know, there is nothing more pleasurable than recalling unpleasantness that has bypassed us successfully.”
Location 2170-2170