Your browser may have trouble rendering this page. See supported browsers for more information.

This page shows the source for this entry, with WebCore formatting language tags and attributes highlighted.

Title

Who do you side with?

Description

<img src="{att_link}candidates.png" align="center" class="frame" caption="2012 Presidential Candidates"> The <a href="http://www.isidewith.com/presidential-election-quiz" source="I Side With">2012 Presidential Candidate Match</a> is quite nicely done and should be very helpful for most. It takes 5-10 minutes at the most. I recommend choosing "other stance" on almost every question instead of just "yes" or "no" because those choices are much more refined and likely to accurately reflect your opinion. Don't forget to adjust the more/less important bar on the left to add weight to your more important issues---or to remove weight from those that you either don't know or care about. My results weren't too surprising<fn>, once you remember that there are more than two candidates in the race. <img src="{att_link}isidewith.png" href="{att_link}isidewith.png" align="center" class="frame" caption="My Results" scale="75%"> The lady with whom I seem to be in agreement spent the second presidential debate cooling her heels at a police station for just trying to <i>attend</i> the debate. Go free and open society! <hr> <ft>The Romney number is authentic and not manipulated at all. To be fair, it's based on a lot of the opinions he expressed in the primaries and all of his official campaign documentation, literature and position papers---and not on the quite radical triangulation he's been doing of late. If all of his espoused positions were taken into account, he'd agree with everybody 100% of the time---just, please, for the love of all that is holy, <b>elect him</b>. Poor Mitt. He wants it <i>so</i> bad, he can taste it.</ft>