Your browser may have trouble rendering this page. See supported browsers for more information.

This page shows the source for this entry, with WebCore formatting language tags and attributes highlighted.

Title

Dean Baker breaks down Remdesivir

Description

The article <a href="https://cepr.net/a-gilead-remdesivir-fix-the-ten-percent-solution/" source="Beat the Press" author="Dean Baker">A Gilead-Remdesivir Fix: The Ten Percent Solution</a> points out that it is absolutely not difficult to fix the so-called problem with remdesivir. It's a short article, so I'll just cite it in full, highlighting the most salient bits for those who need a tl;dr for a four-paragraph article. <bq>The Washington Post had an excellent piece documenting how <b>the government put up most of the money for developing remdesivir</b>, a drug that now offers the hope of being the first effective treatment for the coronavirus. As the piece explains, in spite of the substantial contribution of public funds, <b>Gilead Sciences holds a patent monopoly on remdesivir</b>, which will allow it to charge whatever it wants without facing competition from other manufacturers. There is a simple and obvious solution to this problem. <b>The government should simply take possession of the patent, putting it in the public domain so that anyone can manufacture the drug</b> and also conduct further research, subject to the requirement that any subsequent developments are also in the public domain. To ensure that Gilead is fairly compensated, <b>we can pay the company an amount that is 10 percent above any research costs it incurred that exceeded the government payments for development</b>. Gilead would just have to submit its records, with the payment coming after they are fully audited. See, it’s simple, fun, and easy. <b>We get the drug. Gilead gets a respectable profit, and remdesivir is cheap.</b> Is everybody happy? (Emphasis added.)</bq> The problem seems to be that people cannot even <i>conceive</i> of the government revoking a patent---which it absolutely has the power to do. The government giveth and the government taketh away. How is it even currently a thing that the government spends all the money on research, then privatizes the profits from that research? Answer: corruption, graft, and the same people coming out on top, of course. If you don't accept that certain companies get absolutely free handouts from the government, life gets a lot better for a lot of people in a hurry.