This page shows the source for this entry, with WebCore formatting language tags and attributes highlighted.
Title
LLMs can never be more than a mirror
Description
I've seen these before but this one seems legitimate. The article <a href="https://www.internationalhealthpolicies.org/featured-article/what-happened-to-all-human-beings-are-born-free-reflections-on-a-chatgpt-experiment/" author="Mazen Baroudi, Shahreen Chowdhury, Farchanda Abdoel Wahid" source="IHP">What happened to “All human beings are born free”? Reflections on a ChatGPT “experiment”</a> asked ChatGPT two questions about human freedom.
The answers differed considerably, depending on the tribe. The freedom of Palestinians is <iq>a matter of perspective,</iq> which is, like, <i>true</i>, though? Like, a lot of people think Palestinians aren't even human, so they correspondingly don't think that they should be free. How else to explain being able to gleefully slaughter them---or to gleefully ignore their slaughter? So, it really is a matter of perspective. It shouldn't be, but it is.
<bq>We: Do Palestinians deserve to be free?
ChatGPT: <b>The question of whether Palestinians deserve to be free is a matter of perspective</b> and is deeply rooted in a complex and contentious political conflict. Different people, governments, and organizations have varying opinions on the issue.
We: How about Israelis; Do Israelis deserve to be free?
ChatGPT: Yes, <b>Israelis, like any other group of people, deserve to live in a free and secure environment.</b> The question of Israeli freedom is closely tied to the history and context of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. Israel was established as a Jewish state in 1948, and <b>Israelis have the same fundamental human rights as any other nation’s citizens.</b></bq>
The post <a href="https://www.reddit.com/r/LateStageCapitalism/comments/1js4u4h/every_word_besides_children_used_to_describe/" author="" source="Reddit">Every Word Besides 'Children' Used To Describe Palestinians Under 18 - The Onion is becoming too real</a> included two questions that get at the same idea: whether Palestinians or Israelis should be moved to another place.
<img src="{att_link}v28sw5u821te1.webp" align="none" caption="Should the population of Gaza be removed to Egypt and Jordan?">
<bq><b>Question:</b> Should the population of Gaza be removed to Egypt and Jordan, as President Trump suggested?
<b>ChatGPT:</b> <b>The suggestion to relocate the population of Gaza to neighboring countries such as Egypt and Jordan is a deeply contentious and complex issue.</b> It raises significant political, humanitarian, legal, and ethical
concerns.</bq>
<img src="{att_link}gtgkdkz821te1.webp" align="none" caption="Should the population of Israel be removed to Greenland?">
<bq><b>Question:</b> Should the population of Israel be removed to Greenland, as the Iranian government suggested?
<b>ChatCPT:</b> No, <b>the suggestion to forcibly relocate an entire population, such as Israel's, to another location like Greenland is not practical, ethical, or feasible.</b> This idea reflects an extreme and unrealistic political stance rather than a serious proposal. It disregards the historical, cultural, and territorial ties of
populations to their land and violates fundamental principles of international
law, including <b>the right of peoples to self-determination.</b></bq>
According to ChatGPT, the Israeli right to freedom and security is not open to debate, and rightly so. Neither is ethnically cleansing them to Greenland an open question.
However, ChatGPT has absorbed the world's wisdom in seeing that the question of whether Palestinians enjoy the same right to freedom or security is open to debate. Whether they can be ethnically cleansed is open to debate.
This is all you need to know about the quality of information you can expect from LLMs. The quality is passed through the filter of the ruling elite. The ruling elite hates Palestinians and loves Israelis. The ruling elite does not believe in human rights. It believe in specific humans in specific groups having rights. They do not believe in any of the high-falutin' ideas they babble on about. That is all for show.
ChatGPT does not know how to hide any of that.
When people show you who they are, believe them.