You’re right. Didn’t thougt about just removing a aspect and adding your own implementation. Way easier then using a IoC container.
I don’t like passing around the container anyway as it hides code-dependencies. I once was told folks even call it an anti-pattern. Eg this guy: http://blog.ploeh.dk/2010/02/03/ServiceLocatorisanAnti-Pattern/
… what about replacing the aspect implementation with another one? DI came in my mind when reading this article. What about using a IoC container for construction? Maybe with constructor injection?
ASP.Net 5 (aka vNext) does some parts very similar. See here …
Number of ports: Don’t forget the port-replicators aka Docking-Station. Depending on the notebook model you are using you can get a docking-station for that. Depending on that docking-station you are using you get more ports then on the notebook itself. As you docking-station normally is there where your big screens are, they are connected to docking-station. So ports of the docking-station count too.
VGA: I use it often when on customer site and get “a screen” (if I am lucky a 24", sometimes smaller). Most of the time the customer IT have only VGA-cables or maaaaaybe a DVI (which I can’t plug into my Lenovo notebook) at hand. No display-port-* cables. So I still need a VGA port these days ;-(
MacBook Air: I think you Meran GB instead MB.
Some numbers I heard yesterday by Swiss national radio station about the current conflict: 3 dead Israelis vs. 170 dead Palestine.
Nice article, dude. Interesting what Google tries to achieve with this all? Reducing browsers? Hmm… don’t think so as you already wrote they all (except one but this one is not of question) are acceptable in compatibility. Maybe a kind of “cover my ass” because they don’t test with Opera? But blocking then is really hard. Hmm….
First I would try deleting ALL compiled binaries in all bin and obj directories (for all your projects). Then do a rebuild and maybe restart VS.
We created Windows batchfiles to do this when VS bot in trouble again.
In this sample the Where() could be replaced with a TypeOf<>() I guess. But yes, I got the point ;-)
aber dazu bräuchte ich erst mal einen mac :-/
So you finally in a german class now? :) *takes cover*
What if 9-11 was set up by homeland security to generally increase controlling and enabling this new Business? … just an evil tought from me …
hey, their belts look like thouse we got in the swiss army but look at the shoes. looks like the ones from my dad or even his dad. is this standard equipment of us-army??
I am just listening to a phonecall my colleague has with a customer. Seems the customer did not read this blog yet.
I know not only a few but a actually a lot of young people here in Switzerland that do not accept these regulations once more from America and therefore say, they will not travel to the US any more and telling me that America is kind of an “unwanted country”. They have the mindset that America is on one’s high horse. So I think as well this will have major drawbacks to the U.S. over the time. The reputation of the U.S. already not the best and getting worst for not only a few people here.
The whole situation in the U.S. with so called “Security Issues” (what clearly solves non of these security issues but sounds like they do something against terrorism; in the world of IT this concept is called “Security by obsurity”) reminds me to some Hollywood movies. Do you remember “Equilibrium” or “Brazil”? Think America is moving fast into this direction…
surprised that he really recommend to use com-automation at all. its shaky even für interactive winform-apps. but using com-automation in asp.net app?!?!? … don’t know how they get fogbugz stable at all using these techniques…
“I still can’t use the default Windows XP blue theme for very long”
me too but the silver skin with minimal window caption height works quite well for me. ;)
Nicely written article. I thought exactly the same. A non-geek will probably never click that arrow button. Even I read the hint / tool tip first before I clicked on that ominous little button. So it really is the hidden-geek-option-button normal users don’t care about.
Actually I am searching a lot for things in Vista but most of the time it helps if you just ask yourself “What would I like to do?”. It seems Microsoft spent a lot of thought simplify the whole system and therefore moved quite a lot of options to new places or combined it with other options and so on.
AND: badly they did not yet remove the “Classic Windows Look and Feel” yet :’( I hoped they will remove this fancy old gray user interface with Vista but it is still there. So also more then 10 years after this operating system we still will see the Win95 interface as a lot of IT staff I know by default switches back to this old interface. Maybe they don’t like to learn new stuff ;-) Think I now have to take cover because of the Win96-geek-readers here :-)))
Over and out,
just to get things the right way (as i don’t know java very well):
is this wildcard-thing the same as the “WHERE” in C# 2?
public class A<MYTYPE>
where MYTYPE : MYBASETYPE, new
have to try your examples above in the c# and see if i get this working as well as it looks like a nice exercise for rainy weekends like this ;-)
i already thought it must be bad in the U.S. regarding military expenses but even that worst? …so who am i that i already think the swiss military is ways to expensive?? ;-)
but its cool for people out there like me to get the summaries of nearly everything happend in germany − go on ;-) does cathy like soccer as well (and therefore let you watch it all the time)? :-))))
watched the match as well but this was just lost time. propably this is why i feelt to sleep right after the middle (and just one beer ;-) ). same shit happend while the basil match which was not that good as well. maybe i just know how to watch the boring matches instead the good ones.
And don’t speek but shout − specially to your boss. Pre- and postfix everything with “Sir”. That’s a basic too :-)
i already had a look to this movie some months ago. my first impression was “oh, looks nice but will it be usefull?”. after some thinking about it i would like to get this new version asap. think this ideas will be interesting for other applications as well.
the “bad thing” is that microsoft once more did their own thing for the toolbar-system. now, where they are shiping their current toolbar-system with .net 2.0 they just started to use another system once more so component-writers can do business once copy the microsoft style. the race is started once more :-)